Slashdot Mirror


First American Internet Addiction Treatment Center

An anonymous reader writes "Taking their lead from China, two Americans have opened the first US-based Internet Addiction treatment center in Fall City, Wash. — ironically close to Redmond (Microsoft's hometown). The center, called reStart: Internet Addiction Recovery Program, is a 45-day treatment center where, for a steep set of fees, people can be cured of their addiction to the Web. After paying the $200 application fee, addicts are charged $14,500 for the 45 days, an additional $800 for a screening, and more for extra services, like kayaking ($1,575)."

278 comments

  1. reStart? by Flea+of+Pain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't they have called it reboot? Just sayin'...

    --
    Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
    1. Re:reStart? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, reboot comes before restart. Reboot's when you kick yourself in the ass for being stupid, before you actually do something about it.

    2. Re:reStart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, reboot comes before restart. Reboot's when you kick yourself in the ass for being stupid, before you actually do something about it.

      What, you mean like paying somebody to beat you to death?

    3. Re:reStart? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Shouldn't they have called it reboot? Just sayin'..."

      No. Rebooting is what heroin addicts do when they relapse. Before recovery they boot their drugs, then they stop until one day when they re-boot ;-) [The term "boot" is slang for the act of injecting drugs, esp. heroin]

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:reStart? by maz2331 · · Score: 1

      OR for just $7999 they can go to my competing on-line only rehab service...

    5. Re:reStart? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      How about

      Re: Start ..unless it, in and of itself, is a JavaScript virus. ;)

  2. That would cure me... by Anarchduke · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wonder they cure Internet addiction, after paying 15 grand, you couldn't even afford dial up.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    1. Re:That would cure me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what they say about a fool and his money...

    2. Re:That would cure me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird looking at the numbers presented and realizing that "Hey, my college tuition is lower than this, and that's in a 3.5-month semester. With books and housing, even!"

      This is Penn State Main Campus, by the way, whose tuition costs are increasing ~6% a year.

    3. Re:That would cure me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most retarded thing I've seen. This is typical of humanity, especially in America, which is to say that we have a tendency to violate Socrates' Magic Rule and start preaching about a bunch of bullshit we really have no idea about. The reason I bring this point up is because I am willing to wager a fair sum of money that these people seriously believe they are diagnosing, and treating 'internet addiction' when in reality it has absolutely NOTHING TO DO WITH THE INTERNET!!!! PEOPLE PLEASE REALIZE THIS! We're addicted to OVERSTIMULATION! You can become freaking addicted to Milk, but I don't see 'Milk Addiction Treatment' centers (This is theoretically true, by the way, in that a person with certain addictive predispositions in their genetic makeup can literally become addicted to things that have no 'generally' addictive qualities). The reason you don't see treatments for addictions like this is because it's stupid to treat a specific outlet of what is an addiction CONDITION. It's not treating the underlying cause of the addictions, and therefore it will ultimately ALWAYS fail. Have fun wasting your 15k.

    4. Re:That would cure me... by xaxa · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know what they say about a fool and his money...

      I'd best Google it, just to be sure...

    5. Re:That would cure me... by t3chn0n3rd · · Score: 0

      Which is worse video game addiction or internet addiction. I guess video game addicts have more fun downing mountain dew, while zapping your neigbor, all the while surrounded by wireless lan access , PS3, and nintendo wii controllers. I guess video game addicts have more fun than internet addicts. Personally I think I am an internet dating / porn addict

    6. Re:That would cure me... by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Most of the money goes to the girlfriend they set the guys up with. Say what you will, but it has a high rate of efficacy. The addicts that already have girlfriends, or are girls themselves are the tough cases.

    7. Re:That would cure me... by polle404 · · Score: 1

      for 15 grand, there'd better be free WiFi!

      --

      ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
    8. Re:That would cure me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after paying 15 grand, you couldn't even afford dial up

      $15,000 for a month actually isn't that high, in this context. Eating disorder treatment centers (DAMHIK) routinely charge $1000/day or more, often even for just the "PHP" (day program, usually in an office suite) level of care. And while probably half the people there are on insurance, about half are private-pay. Yeah, $30,000/month, private pay.

    9. Re:That would cure me... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      C'mon, girls... you must be new here, everyone on the internet knows by now that all girls really are fat guys. You don't think that Elf girl you had sex with last night was REALLY a gir...

      Oh. OH! You mean REAL girls?

      They still exist?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Free WiFi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the center have free wifi?

  4. I wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wonder if the beatings are free, or if you pay extra for that?

    1. Re:I wonder if... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Regular beatings are included.

      Beatings that kill you cost an extra $1000.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:I wonder if... by Rayzed · · Score: 1

      However, hazing class is $50 for the sock full of soap! That's a whole lotta fun right there - way better than facebook any day!

    3. Re:I wonder if... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if the beatings are free, or if you pay extra for that?

      We prefer to call them, "Physical Realignment Therapy Sessions".

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:I wonder if... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The beatings are free, but the legal paperwork you have to sign to get them costs money.

  5. money by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it very well sounds like the goal here isn't so much to actually "treat" people so much as to make large sums of money by catering to those of us who have access to lots of cash.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:money by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      And there you've summed up just about all businesses in the USA.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    2. Re:money by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and? That's capitalism yo.

    3. Re:money by EggyToast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems like it would be a lot cheaper to simply go 45 days with no internet access.

    4. Re:money by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially the insurance rackets.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:money by pluther · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Concerned Parents would be the target market here, I'm guessing.

      And why are they Concerned? Because they read all the marketing literature about the horrible fate awaiting their precious little snowflakes if they spend too much time on WoW.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    6. Re:money by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Hell, it'd be cheaper to go on a month long cruise. Although, I hear they have the internet now...

    7. Re:money by Golias · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it needs to be made more clear to the older generation that, no matter how much they don't like it, the fact is that the day is rapidly approaching when the person who doesn't spend *enough* time on the Internet will be the socially dysfunctional one.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there you've summed up just about all businesses in the USA.

      Actually, Scientology was the first thing that came to mind...

    9. Re:money by Desler · · Score: 1
      Did you miss this part of the GP's post?

      all businesses in the USA.

      Your post is redundant.

    10. Re:money by Twyst3d · · Score: 1

      I agree with you but I would have gone the extra step to say that doing so does not require one to be physically home alone. iPhones and their soon to come cheaper better clones that dont require 2 year contracts will help that. In which case is it internet addiction? Or simply deppression?

      --
      And this has been another installament of Captain Obvious! /whoosh
    11. Re:money by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      And there you've summed up just about all businesses in the world.

      There. Fixed that for you.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    12. Re:money by Ohrion · · Score: 1

      Posting to remove "troll" mod. Meant to click insightful and missed. Grr, /. should have a way to modify your mod other than replying to a post.

    13. Re:money by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Comparing to many other medical costs in this country, this is actually pretty affordable. Next step, make it an official psychologic disease and make it coverable by insurance.

    14. Re:money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glib!

      Suppressive!

      Holy crap the next time I see you I am totally giving you the harshest personality analysis you've ever seen. And while you're here, would you like a free copy of Diuretics?

    15. Re:money by blhack · · Score: 1

      You could even write a blog about it and *MAKE* money.

      And by "write a blog" I, of course, mean type it out on a typewritter and mail it to somebody to have them scan it.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    16. Re:money by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of opening a treatment center for gambling addicts... it will cost $15k and offer 7-3 odds on being cured.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    17. Re:money by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You mean money from the government that provides "free" public health care? Oh ya! Your tax dollars soon-to-be at work...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    18. Re:money by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      And then there's some towns trying out wifi coverage - or individuals doing the same (I know three parks in my city where I get wifi coverage in the entire area of the park, and a few more where I can get partial coverage in some spots). If anything, the fact that I'm blatant about using a computer (whether my laptop or my handheld) makes me look like more of a geek than when I was a depressed, reclusive, eremitic nerd.

    19. Re:money by quotationspage · · Score: 1

      "Internet is so big, so powerful and pointless that for some people it is a complete substitute for life." --Andrew Brown

    20. Re:money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Mail it? How without intern... oh... wait, there was something... what do you call that, you know, that whre you can send emails but without the internet, you put it in some ... paper header, dunno how it's called...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They are concerned for the same reason parents have always been concerned, from Tom Sawyer to AD&D: Their kids spend a lot of time doing something they don't understand. They don't understand the thing itself and they thus certainly cannot understand the fascination of it. Why would someone spend hours and hours doing $what_kids_enjoy_as_pastime_today when they could instead be doing $what_I_did_as_pastime_in_my_youth?

      Hell, I notice I'm getting old. The internet came still when I was young enough to embrace it, for me, back then, it was nothing but an extension of good ol' BBS. Cellphones came long afterwards, after I "matured" or "grew old" and didn't really want to expand into something new again. And, behold, I don't understand the fascination. Why'd I text? It takes a lot longer and I hate clicking together messages on my cell. I now have a smartphone. I never used any of the 'smart' functions of it. I did my best to avoid using the calender and synchronisation function for as long as I could. I don't like using cells. Generally, my medium of communication is a keyboard. Full sized. Not some weak "hit the key with the head of a pin if you can" excuse.

      Now I see a lot of my younger friends who matured "after" the onset of the cell hype run around with Androids and iPhones and text away and communicate this way. Mobile communication, something that I didn't grew up with and that I will use, but only to the extent that I need it. Because I don't have the urge to know more about it, to embrace it, to find out where the limits might take me. And I'm actually rather tech-interested.

      Let's assume I didn't decide against kids. My son/daughter would probably be around 13 today, certainly have a cell and spend his or her time texting and playing games on his or her cellphone rather than his computer or console. I'd wonder why. That little displays and those tiny processors, they can't hold a candle to my quadcore and the GTX290 beating in my box, and those tiny little speakers don't come close to my earthshaking base speakers, why the fuck would anyone wanna do THIS instead of THAT?

      I certainly wouldn't understand. And I'm also certain it would be that way. Mobility is the key, it seems the next generation of gamers want to play, but they also want to be very social, much more social than my generation was. Not only virtual, but for real. They may still just text instead of talk, but they sit in the same restaurant at the same table and have a glass of coke together.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:money by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It will be worse than that. We will soon spend a lot of our time "connected" in some way. We already reached the point where we are always, everywhere readily reachable, something that was anything but normal a little over a decade ago. Today you're seen as some sort of weirdo if you don't have a cell and thus can't be reached everywhere, including tub and can.

      When I look at some of the kids I'm working with, I see a trend towards an urge to be "omnipresent", at least virtually. They want to be in touch with everyone they know, they expect their friends to be reachable rather than being called back, likewise, they feel disconnected if they cannot be reached instantly. I rather see a trend towards more mobile connectivity rather than being more "static" connected. They don't just want to be able to reach others, it's important for them to be reachable.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Stop the scare, will ya?

      I am from a country with "free" public health care. And let me reassure you, they wouldn't pay for this kind of ripoff.

      Our standards concerning the question whether some kind of "treatment" is covered by your insurance is usually subject to very close scrunity. They don't pay for everything. They pay for proven, trusted procedures that can be shown to help. You'll neither get any mandatory insurance here to pay for some sort of homeopatic cure or other miracle work. Psychological treatment is, due to the often hard to prove results, nearly certainly out of the plan.

      So please, stop the spin.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:money by csartanis · · Score: 1

      No, capitalism is providing a product for a fee that is determined by the market. Gouging the rich and stupid is just an added bonus.

    25. Re:money by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Stop the scare, will ya?

      American's should be scared of nationalized health care. At least implemented in this country.

      I am from a country with "free" public health care.

      I'm happy to hear it works well where you live.

      And let me reassure you, they wouldn't pay for this kind of ripoff.

      You either (a), a member of congress and thus are towing the party line. Or (b), are not well informed about American politics and the rampant amount of corruption that has infested it.

      So please, stop the spin.

      I'll stop the "spin" when our elected officials stop *lying* to our faces.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    26. Re:money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You think your officials are more corrupt than ours? Hmm... maybe we benefit from healthcare (and its security checks) having been implemented during a time when politicians were less prone to shady deals. Yeah, we had some awesome politicians right after WW2.

      Generally, you needn't be too scared, though. National healthcare is a very, very expensive enterprise. You can't easily divert large enough amounts of money without actually bleeding it dry to make it noticable. I mean, you think a Senator would bend over for a few pennies? Or a few thousand?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:money by blhack · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're kidding, but...

      As an admin, the idea of paper mail frightens me...

      "let me get this straight...you're going to take this piece of paper, write where you want it to go, then place it in a box and you think it's going to get there because there is some guy that will probably come around, take the paper from the box, then take it to another box where you're also pretty sure the person you wanted to read your paper will get it? Are you fucking joking? Do you get a return receipt? How do you know if there was a failure? WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!?"

      The fact that paper mail is looked at as a reliable means of contacting somebody is frightening to me.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    28. Re:money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That it has legally binding quality where a PGP signed and verified mail doesn't scares me, to be honest.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Those telco companies don't know where to stop by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    People will now have to pay monthly fee for not being connected to the Internet as well?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Those telco companies don't know where to stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A altered quote from the movie Half Baked:

      Thurgood: I'm here today because I'm addicted..to the internet.
      Rehab patient: You in here 'cuz of the internet?! Man, this is some BULLSHIT!
      Bob Saget/Cocaine addict: The internet is not a drug. I used to suck dick for coke.
      Rehab patient: I seen him [do it]!
      Bob Saget/Cocaine addict: Now that's an addiction, man. You ever suck some dick to get on the internet?
      Thurgood: No, I can't say I have.
      Bob Saget/Cocaine addict: I didn't think so.

  7. SWEET! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I sign up online?

    1. Re:SWEET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure thing...and they'll send you a confirmation by e-mail. They won't tell you when they'll send it so you may have to keep checking your inbox. I don't think I'm addicted to the Internet, but I do have a cron job to automatically order online from pizza hut every friday.

    2. Re:SWEET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, can I be treated online? I don't want to have to go outside for this...

    3. Re:SWEET! by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      I think that just means you're addicted to pizza!

    4. Re:SWEET! by Hawk-ML · · Score: 1

      And do they take Paypal?

  8. So, slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when do we start flocking en masse to these "Treatment Centers" ??

    1. Re:So, slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No pr0n = no deal.

    2. Re:So, slashdotters... by gnick · · Score: 1

      pr0n? For that kind of $$$, I'm expecting them to suppress my pr0n addiction w/ hookers and blow.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  9. Brilliant! by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must give a nod to this highly creative solution to net addiction: charge the victim so much money they can afford neither a computer nor a net connection! The elegance of the solution is awe-inspiring.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Brilliant! by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Obviously you are being somewhat facetious... but here is my question: why is it these "clinics" and "addiction help" things never make you do something constructive in your time? Kayaking is fun. Of course it's fun to not be on the internet to kayak. But why not, say ... work on something? Maybe ... chop wood? I don't know, I'm sure one could creatively come up with something productive to do instead of basically paying for a vacation without internet.

      Plus, if it was productive, it would subsidize the cost.

    2. Re:Brilliant! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      The idea of these kinds of clinics is that people need to "get their highs" from other things in life. It's not just about taking them away from their addiction, its showing them all the stuff they could be doing with their time, showing them the other pieces that life has to offer.

      If you put addicts in an area where they have to work, they're just going to get worn down, get angry, and want to resort to their habit to make them feel better.

      Lets face it, if I were addicted to the internet, making me chop down a tree all day is going to make me want to escape into World of Warcraft. If you take me out on a Kayak, and I see cool animals, waterfalls, and discover a newfound love for photography, I'm not going to have time for WoW with all the cool pictures I'll be taking.

      But then again, I don't have a medical degree, so I'm just pulling this out of nowhere.

    3. Re:Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can go to a public place and start peeing on people. That will for sure get you a free vacation and you can always blame your internet addition :) It's a win-win!

    4. Re:Brilliant! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      These guys put Comcast etc. to shame. They have managed to both raise the price AND lower the bandwidth to 0kbps, and people are voluntarily switching! And they are even net neutral by not discriminating based on the source; they block everything...

    5. Re:Brilliant! by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      all the cool pictures I'll be taking

      So many pictures to upload to my flickr account later that day!

    6. Re:Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be curious to see if the Church of Scientology has anything to do with this. It sounds like other endeavors of theirs - see Narconon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narconon

    7. Re:Brilliant! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's gonna work that well, the average consumer will borrow the money to go to this treatment center.

      Or try to claim it against their insurance, since they had a "medical necessity" to cure their internat addiction affliction...

    8. Re:Brilliant! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, having to chop wood all day would sure cure your Vanguard addiction. For WoW... hmm... maybe they can employ you as a smith or something, should work out.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wondered this too, although looking into it I can't see any obvious links. It seems these people are likely your common-or-garden variety of money grabbing shits, rather than batshit insane cultist money grabbing shits.

      The thing that allayed my fears of the CoS being involved is the fact they refer to 4/5 members of their team as "Psychologist", something Scientology certainly would never do... Xenu does not approve of shrinks!

      P.S. Fuck Scientology.

  10. Website? by Vrallis · · Score: 1

    So, do they have a website? Myspace page? Twitter page? Facebook page? Youtube channel?

    1. Re:Website? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, do they have a website?

      Of course. http://www.netaddictionrecovery.com/

      Myspace page?

      Don't be silly.

      Twitter page?

      Yep. http://twitter.com/GetYourLifeBack

      Facebook page?

      Yep. http://www.netaddictionrecovery.com/social-network/facebook.html

      Youtube channel?

      They're probably still working on it...

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:Website? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably the attendants will keep everyone informed about their progress on Twitter, and afterwards blog about their success, and maybe even put some videos on YouTube about how they are no longer internet addicts.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Website? by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 4, Funny
      Oh man, I found this HILARIOUS:

      I had for a very extended period of time an addiction to an online game. I was very antisocial and i basically lived to play. Talking to Cosette helped me learn how to look at my addiction from another perspective. She got me to try to stop and i did. Now I am a much happier person and I have made an incredible amount of progress in my life. I have so many more friends, and I find that things come more easily to me, and I find joy in more things. Putting my life into one thing was horrible for me and now I have learned to apply myself, and I have broken my addiction. Thanks alot --Conner

      Guide to the perfect testimonial:

      Step 1: Use generalized words when talking about time. For example, instead of saying "for two years," use the term "very extended period of time."
      Step 2: Mention that you now have a new perspective due to talking with --insert name here--. Don't go into detail about what your perspective is now or what it was then.
      Step 3: Instead of detailing what steps you took to stop, just say - "she got me to try to stop and i did."
      Step 4: Claim that you are happier
      Step 5: Claim you now have bajillions of friends!
      Step 6: ?????
      Step 7: Profit!

    4. Re:Website? by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have so many more friends, and I find that things come more easily to me

      Obviously, she broke his WoW addiction by getting him addicted to Facebook!

    5. Re:Website? by ketilwaa · · Score: 1

      How great! Are they in Second Life as well? I might start checking that out to say hello.

    6. Re:Website? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I heard they couldn't get the YouTube videos to appear on the top of their MySpace page, because it contained a link to a 4chan wiki.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Website? by orkybash · · Score: 1

      Funny to think about at first, but not actually that weird. This is probably the best way to reach out to everyone who they think needs help...

    8. Re:Website? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that sounds like the perfect testimonial for almost any kind of product, including pre-lubed condoms.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    9. Re:Website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/netaddictionrecovery

    10. Re:Website? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      So is this the same as becoming a scientologist? or, is it less expensive?

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  11. Forgive me if I'm skeptical by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 5, Informative
    They didn't talk about the qualifications of the people who run this place, only that they are:

    Two friends -- Cosette Rae, a clinical social worker, and author Hilarie Cash

    Now, these people could be people devastated by personal loss due to too much World of Warcraft by a loved one... or they could be two people who are fearmongerers desperately trying to leech cash out of rich Microsoft yuppie parents who can't figure out how to pull the plug on their kid's computerboxstation360.

    All I'm saying is the article doesn't mention anything about them, and given the lack of PhD or even MD behind the names... I'll say nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Where did you get the idea you need a medical Degree to open a clinic?

    2. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but in America, the word "author" is the most respectable word one can have associated with themselves. If you've written a book on anything, you are a magical wizard and know all things.

    3. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What are YOU talking about?

      I never said that they couldn't open a clinic without a having a medical degree... All I was saying is that I wouldn't trust those people as far as I could throw them to help others with their addictions.

      I mean, they didn't even include a quote from the starters with why they do what they do...

    4. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by Golias · · Score: 1

      They didn't talk about the qualifications of the people who run this place, only that they are:

      Two friends -- Cosette Rae, a clinical social worker, and author Hilarie Cash

      Now, these people could be people devastated by personal loss due to too much World of Warcraft by a loved one... or they could be two people who are fearmongerers desperately trying to leech cash out of rich Microsoft yuppie parents who can't figure out how to pull the plug on their kid's computerboxstation360.

      All I'm saying is the article doesn't mention anything about them, and given the lack of PhD or even MD behind the names... I'll say nothing to see here, move along.

      Are you perhaps referencing that crackpot lady who started a WoW rehab clinic (based loosely on a book she read about 12-step programs) after her clinically-depressed kid who played a lot of WoW tragically took his own life?

      If so, it seems that her biggest mistake in doing so wasn't the misdirected rage at her "patients", nor the self-righteous religious mumbo-jumbo, but rather that she didn't charge high enough prices to get people's attention and evoke a sense of legitimacy.

      As with many new ventures, it can sometimes be a mistake not to "go big."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by Michael+Nathan · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the feeling that all the checks for this place are to be written out to Hilarie? Last name only, of course, for simplicity's sake.

    6. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by d-r0ck · · Score: 1

      She has a PHD.

      Heres a youtube vid:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_zeqhFNck8

    7. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Hilarie+Cash%2C+PhD

    8. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Now, now, now, be fair. You don't need a PhD or MD these days to squeeze money out of people. Those days are numbered, after all, mandatory health insurance is around the corner, and we know how this will end for docs and quacks!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by theotherbastard · · Score: 1

      They didn't talk about the qualifications of the people who run this place, only that they are:

      Two friends -- Cosette Rae, a clinical social worker, and author Hilarie Cash

      So... I make that check out to Cash?

      --
      Buttons aren't toys.
    10. Re:Forgive me if I'm skeptical by Beerdood · · Score: 1
      The bio page here mentions that Hilarie has a PhD as a licensed mental health counselor, and Cosette (the other partner) has a masters in social work (I'm assuming that's what the MSW stands for, no idea about the other acronyms on that page). There's a psychology student / intern there with a bachelor's degree as well, working on her PhD

      However, I did get a chuckle out of the qualifications of the other two guys there - their titles are "Life Coach" and "Assistant Recreation Director". one blurb for example includes

      Gary Simmons has been working with youth for the past 20+ years. His love and passion for the outdoors has made him an avid outdoorsman, craftsman, and natural leader

      $15000 to do a bunch of outdoorsy stuff? I think I'd rather send my kids to summer camp and yoink their i-phone, or just take a vacation somewhere where internet access is limited / non-existent for a fraction of the cost.

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  12. Kayaking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm surprised it's not just a room full of prostitutes and an all you can eat plan for a week.

    1. Re:Kayaking? by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Troll

      If it was, slashdot would have about five comments per story, because we'd all be there except those nine women who post here!

      The gay nerds would be gone because those nine women would scare them off...

    2. Re:Kayaking? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      > I'm surprised it's not just a room full of prostitutes and an all you can eat plan for a week.

      What? No blackjack!?

    3. Re:Kayaking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prostitutes get upset when you ask about their bandwidth and throughput.

  13. HELP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You: I can't stop spending money on Amazon and Ebay!
    Them: Don't worry! We're here to help! Where's that checkbook?

  14. What a rip off... by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So basically you're paying $15,000 for summer camp? I mean, there wouldn't be much that they do there that would help any more than just spending a month and a half outdoors with a large group of people away from computers. You're simply showing the people that there's more to do out there while helping them build real world social skills by keeping them in a group. The $15,000 is way excessive, and if you've got that kind of money lying around I can't imagine your internet addiction being that much of a problem.

    1. Re:What a rip off... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Well, a good number of people who have to work for a living already get ripped from their home computers for 8 hours a day, into an environment where wasting time on the Internet is frowned upon. Maybe not the people in the US who've posted to this article so far, myself included :). Even in places like my old job, where the entire chain of command up to director allowed employees to play WoW during downtime (Tier I call center), you still had to stop whenever work happened, which seems enough to prevent "Internet addiction" from setting in... So, people in a position to get Internet addiction in the first place are more likely to be either unemployed/rich, unemployed/too poor to afford even a summer camp, or unemployed/kid whos parents like to throw money at any problem. With these people in mind, $15,000 seems to be a good price to set it at...

    2. Re:What a rip off... by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Troll

      There's an alternate: your neighborhood bar. However, it's almost as expensive...

    3. Re:What a rip off... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Even in places like my old job, where the entire chain of command up to director allowed employees to play WoW during downtime (Tier I call center), you still had to stop whenever work happened, which seems enough to prevent "Internet addiction" from setting in...

      Sheesh, that's enough to keep WoW from setting in!

      "This is great, we've got Illidan down to 35% and no deaths so far! We're gonna win this encounter!"

      <lots of phones ringing>

      "Damn, where's the pause button!?!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:What a rip off... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Well for one, the summer camp won't beat your kid to death for not running fast enough.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    5. Re:What a rip off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do battlegrounds, silly.

      raiding is for after the shift is over and you havent gone home yet.

    6. Re:What a rip off... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      When you look closely, such time can be valuable when you play MMOs. Think of all the "downtime" or "preparation time" you have to deal with before raids and other big events. Harvesting goods, slaughtering trashmobs (which you can often do by not doing anything but autoattacking, just very, very slowly and not for too long), traveling around to collect stuff from bank and PO, yelling in the market chat for stuff you can't buy off the shelf in the AH...

      Friend of mine is in the same situation, playing EvE. He's making a fortune trading during his work hours.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. One question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and more for extra services, like kayaking ($1,575)."

    Is that virtual kayaking on an Xbox 360?

  16. Why ironically close to Redmond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS was and is far from the lead on the internet thing.

    Wouldn't it be ironically close to Al Gore's place of birth or something similar?

  17. pen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have one of something like this for television?

    1. Re:pen by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      Or phones - they have a 10 days without text thing, which is just a phone made more practical for some people, but nothing for voice messages - have they seriously decided to single out all new technologies or what.

  18. Uh Oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit, they'll use tasers here, not like China where they get sticks..

  19. Taco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Taco! It's Not TUESday, it's THURSday! How about filet-o-fish Thursday?

  20. Feel Sorry by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

    First I feel sorry for the parents who can't get their kids to get off the Internet and go outside.
    Next, I have to say, these greedy bastards did it again. Another way to make money. Another way to get money out of those rich folks who can afford it.
    Parents - put some time into your children, talk to them, get them into a traditional summer camp - that won't cost you a quarter of your child's college savings. Spend some more time with your children, invest time and emotions into them instead of wasting your dough.

    --
    Life is about being a Phoenix!
    1. Re:Feel Sorry by mcgrew · · Score: 0, Troll

      Another way to get money out of those rich folks who can afford it.

      Better than making your money from poor people who can't.

    2. Re:Feel Sorry by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Next, I have to say, these greedy bastards did it again. Another way to make money. Another way to get money out of those rich folks who can afford it.

      More like, getting money out of people's insurance who can afford it, if they have the right spin on things. Just what we need to get health insurance rates to go even higher than they are now...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:Feel Sorry by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I actually feel sorry for parents who "tried everything else" (save talking with their kids) and who scrape the money together, saved for some actually important investment or their kids' college fund, to blow it on this baloney. That really gets me fuming.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Odd by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's odd how they've conveniently changed the meaning of "addiction". The definition used to be that for something to be addictive, it had to have physical withdrawal symptoms, like alcohol, caffiene, niccotine, heroin, etc. What used to be separately termed "habituation" is now termed "addiction".

    However, as I learned when quitting cigarettes, the habituation can be as bad as the addiction. Two years after I stopped, and didn't even WANT a cigarette, I still slapped the shirt pocket that used to hold the cigarettes when I left work. Do anything for thirty years and you'll miss it, even if "it" is being hit on the head with a stick.

    1. Re:Odd by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also think it is odd how low the bar seems to be for categorizing non-destructive actions as "addictive". Using the Internet is not a harmful activity. You can surf the net plenty, and suffer no ill effects in terms of health, family, job, etc. While you certainly can go overboard and start doing it at the exclusion of everything else in your life, well you can do that for ANYTHING in your life. However the activity isn't harmful in and of itself, even in large amounts (unlike, say, drinking alcohol which will hurt you if done heavily).

      However for some reason there seems to be a lot of people that want to classify heavy Internet use or gaming as "addiction." "Oh that guy goes home and plays Warcraft for 4 hours a day after work! He's addicted! Now if you'll excuse me I have to go watch 4 hours of TV, like a normal person." Just because a person likes to goof off a lot on the Internet, doesn't make that goofing off any more problematic than any other recreation. One of the nice things for many people living in a first world nation is that you have a lot of time to amuse yourself since your more basic needs are taken care of.

      I think part of the problem is what you are on to is the reclassification as these things as "addiction." Now that they are addictions, they get evaluated with that standard. Well if someone comes home every day and drinks alcohol continuously for hours and then passes out, yes, they have a problem, they are almost certainly addicted to it. However that is very different from coming home and spending hours on a hobby.

    2. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Do anything for thirty years and you'll miss it, even if "it" is being hit on the head with a >stick.

      It sounds like what you're looking for is a *Chinese* "Internet Addiction Camp"...

    3. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's odd how they've conveniently changed the meaning of "addiction". The definition used to be that for something to be addictive, it had to have physical withdrawal symptoms, like alcohol, caffiene, niccotine, heroin, etc. What used to be separately termed "habituation" is now termed "addiction".

      Its not really a change in definition; the distinction was based on the belief that the latter group of things was purely a matter of choice with no physiological component (because, when the brain wasn't as well studied, the only evidence of physiological involvement we could detect was physical withdrawal symptoms), while the latter had a physiological basis (a bit of reflection will reveal that the whole idea was grounded in a presumption that mind/body distinctions were not merely philosophically or metaphysically valid on some level, but literally true with substantial material effect.) We've since learned more about the physiological processes involved, and learned that there are distinct physiological changes that are involved in addictions which are common between those which also feature physical withdrawal and those which do not, and that those common features are central to the problems faced and dealing with them and their consequences is important to dealing with addiction, and also that many of the behavioural symptoms seen when access to things which were believed to the objects of mere "habituation" have a distinct physiological underpinning, and are, despite not having previously been understood as such, symptoms of physical withdrawal. This has certainly been the case with regard to various non-drug addictions like gambling viewed alongside drug addictions. (But different addictions often have their own unique physiological and social features, which means that while there are commonalities in addressing them, there are differences, too.)

      "Internet addiction" remains controversial, however; I think the dominant thinking is still that internet use is not generally an object of addiction in and of itself, and that problem internet use is, when it relates to addiction at all, a symptom and a means of gaining access to some other object of addiction (again, gambling would be a common example, I'm sure any reader can think of several other possibilities.) This would suggest that treating "internet addiction", as such, may not be the most efficient approach.

    4. Re:Odd by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      While you certainly can go overboard and start doing it at the exclusion of everything else in your life, well you can do that for ANYTHING in your life.

      Your point being? Lots of people do go overboard, some to the extent of actually dying from their disregard of even basic bodily needs. There's programs right now for people who are addicted to sex and probably dozens of other things. Gaming and the internet are no different.

      Going online isn't a problem. Spending 18 hours a day online is a problem and that is labeled as addiction.

    5. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I miss that stick somedays.
      Makes my head hurt wistfully just thinking about it.

    6. Re:Odd by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      It's odd how they've conveniently changed the meaning of "addiction". The definition used to be that for something to be addictive, it had to have physical withdrawal symptoms, like alcohol, caffiene, niccotine, heroin, etc. What used to be separately termed "habituation" is now termed "addiction".

      The problem is that "addiction" is being used to cover two different phenomena:

      1) Physical addiction is where use of a substance causes your body to incorporate it into your biochemistry, and you require a supply of that substance for normal functioning.

      2) Psychological addiction is where a behavior stimulates the reward center of your brain, and you come to depend on that behavior to get your brain up to a "normal" level of reward.

      They're different problems, and require different solutions. In particular, treatment for physical addiction varies depending on the substance involved, and any treatment needs to make sure you don't drop dead during the withdrawal process. On the other hand, treatment for psychological addiction is independant of the type of stimulus, and there's no real chance of dying during withdrawal.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    7. Re:Odd by sr180 · · Score: 1

      I also think it is odd how low the bar seems to be for categorizing non-destructive actions as "addictive".

      Thats because these people are 'addicted'. Take your typical 'addicted' World Of Warcraft player... They have a severe 'urge' to play the game. While they are not playing the game - they may even suffer from anxiety and similar effects.

      The best treatment for this is a behavioural therapy known as CBT. There is alot of research going into it at the moment, because its being successfully used to treat gamblers. Believe it or not, but the effects of addiction on gamblers is very similar to the effects of game players.

      In these cases, we arent talking about people who come home and spend hours on a hobby, were talking about those that 'have to play'. Who have a constant urge to play, and who suffer psychological effects when not playing.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    8. Re:Odd by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      You mean like certain religions (fasting is one example off the top of my head.)

    9. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would consider it an addiction if you suffered from the same things that heavy drug users did... using to the exclusion of friends, family, job etc. Playing WoW for 20 hours stretches and constantly calling off of work sick until you're fired? That seems to be in the ballpark of addiction.

      What about the people that can't stop doing things like reading slashdot/hacker news/digg/etc even while at work? What if they go to work and do that all day rather than working? What if while they are doing that, they are stressing out that they aren't getting work done and they could get fired... but this just drives them to seek out more 'info sites' on the internet to lurk on rather than inspiring them to stop lurking and get the work done?

      I would qualify that as an addiction (or at least some sort of mental condition that possibly needs therapy to work out).

    10. Re:Odd by Cederic · · Score: 2, Funny

      The best treatment for this is a behavioural therapy known as CBT.

      While I concede that Cock and Ball Torture would indeed dampen my enthusiasm for online gaming I hadn't heard of it being a professional behavioural therapy option.

      At least, not that type of professional..

    11. Re:Odd by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Whether it's an addiction or not is not (mainly) a matter of intensity. More a matter of need. If you absolutely NEED one hour of TV a day or you are irritated and antisocial, you're an addict. You're not just because you vegg' away a weekend on the couch in front of the idiot box because your plans crumbled and the guy you wanted to team up with to fix your garage got sick and all your friends left town for some event.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Odd by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's some sort of reverse Pavlov conditioning. You know, every time you cast a spell, you get your nuts stapled to the chair or something like that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. AVGN Therapy by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    They should force them to play mind-bendingly awful games, a few days of "Sunday Funday" ought to set them straight. That or the popular "beat you to death" therapy I've heard so much about.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:AVGN Therapy by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Wow I completely missed everything and apparently just made up an article to make fun of.

      My reading comprehension is waaaaaay down. Time for a break from /. methinks.

      Actually maybe I can break my addiction to all internet media while I'm at it. If only there was some really expensive way of doing that...

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  23. coutless hours on the internet by bodland · · Score: 1

    I have never once come across "internet addiction" I know it simply does not exist. NOW LEAVE ME ALONE! STOP STANDING BEHIND ME...GOD!

  24. I have my own internet addiction treatment center by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's called my back yard. The director? My wife. Both are very effective.

  25. Re:Web based support group? by blofeld42 · · Score: 1

    Just open up a bugzilla ticket.

  26. P.T. Barnum Had it Right by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Informative

    "There's a sucker born every minute."

    Sorry, but anyone who pays over $15k to "cure" themselves of addiction to the internet is an idiot. I can cure it for you faster, easier, and cheaper - in fact, you'll MAKE money.

    Cancel.

    Your.

    Internet.

    There. I saved you over $15k.

    Sorry for the lack of sympathy but there are people out there with real addictions who need help. "Internet addiction" is a complete joke.

    And, for anyone who is about to point out people who have an obsessive need to be online, don't confuse OCD behaviour with addiction. The two are different. One may lead to the other but they are not the same. People aren't addicted to the internet. Sorry.

    1. Re:P.T. Barnum Had it Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:P.T. Barnum Had it Right by pluther · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone's going to be "curing" themselves at this place.

      My guess is it will be mostly teenagers whose easily impressed parents have been frightened by the marketing literature.

      I think there was a Batman Beyond episode about this place...

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    3. Re:P.T. Barnum Had it Right by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but anyone who pays over $15k to "cure" themselves of addiction to the internet is an idiot.

      True

      Sorry for the lack of sympathy but there are people out there with real addictions who need help.

      So you cant afford more sympathy because other people need help? Are you helping those other people or just feling sorry for them?

      "Internet addiction" is a complete joke.

      And you base that opinion on what exactly? Your graphic design experience?

      And, for anyone who is about to point out people who have an obsessive need to be online, don't confuse OCD behaviour with addiction

      I really dont get this one. OCD's are addictions by nature. Are you saying it's not addiction because it's not chemical? There are many studies that show chemical changes in the brains reward system while using the internet. Anorexic disorders are treated as addictive behaviors and there is plenty of evidence for gambling addictions as well. Do you tell them stay out of the casinos? You might as well tell me to
      Just.

      Quit.

      Smoking.

      You think that is really all it takes? Perhaps I should spare some sympathy for you.

      One may lead to the other but they are not the same

      Addiction and OCD are two different types of descriptors. Addiciton is a generic and ambiguos medical term, while OCD is term used in psychiatric diagnoses. Someone categorized as having OCD would show addictive behaviors; that is they would exhibit symptoms of repeated uncontrollable urges. An addict could show signs of OCD as they exhibt symptoms of anxiety and intrusive thoughts. But so what, what point does that even make? Should we say "Oh well it's just in internet obsession/compulsion, not a real problem," because you think OCD isn't as bad as addiction?

      In the most basic terms addiction is defined as continuing to do something despite the negative consequences associated with doing it. Some people have been found to use the internet despite the negative consequences. This list includes loss of family, freinds, financial standing, helath and even death. For all intents and purposes they are addicted to the internet. Many addicts have been found to be unable to treat their addictions without help, so treatment centers are being established. The only joke here is the price. I'm sorry you think that's not true but you are wrong.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    4. Re:P.T. Barnum Had it Right by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Some people have been found to use the internet despite the negative consequences. This list includes loss of family, freinds, financial standing, helath and even death.

      While loss of death sounds really cool, I'm worried about the impact of Internet use on my grammar and spelling.

    5. Re:P.T. Barnum Had it Right by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      ...You might as well tell me to
      Just.

      Quit.

      Smoking.

      Hit. My counter to the other reply you received (definitely not you) is based on 30 years of psychology and neurology exposure, analysis, and research (but I am NOT a doctor):

      Neurons release chemicals to encourage the inter-neural firings. The more it's done, the more the neurons adjust to allow / encourage the pathways that have been developed.

      Simply put, once you're addicted to something, it's hard to stop. When you smoke, you inhale chemicals that can pass through the blood-brain barrier and affect the neurons, (read up on it, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine). Dopamine is one of the key introductions that your brain adjusts to and gets addicted to.

      Dopamine is introduced by things that one finds pleasurable, hence encouragement. Encouragement is also a form of chemical affect to the inter-neural firing, and is a form of addiction. It's hard for one to stop because your brain is asking for more of what it's missing.

      In the end, you're addicted to whatever you're addicted to because of chemical introduction and the brain's increased level of counter-action. Regardless of whether or not you brought chemicals in that caused other chemical reactions or did something that released epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine (down the line we go...), or you excited yourself by mystery, learning, combat between individuals or ideas, etc.

      It's ALL chemical-based. ALL OF IT. The way to stop is, guess what? To stop the introduction, and have your life based on feelings and objections SUCK for a while, until your brain adjusts and doesn't require it or lean toward it in bias anymore.

      Simple logic.

      Short version: quit stuff and let your life suck until it doesn't suck anymore. ;)

      BTW you're reading from an ex-smoker of two packs per day here. I also have a hyper-efficient liver which has been the root of 3x chemical introduction requirement before it shows up at a whatever-you-call-that medicinal gap. In other words, with blood analysis, I need to take 3 times the normal dose before it's at the proper level of agreement. Because of this, I have a hard time getting drunk and completely lost the interest in alcohol. Do what you want to with that when you're considering the math of addiction. If it ain't fun, it ain't something you go after.

      Quitting was easy when it came to nicotine. I quit cold-turkey and had life suck for about a month and a quarter. After that, I could smoke a cig and not have it do much short-term damage, but I consider the downside of the taste and smell of clothing and am actually more toward the NO side than the OK-I'll-take-one side.

      I am *NOT* a doctor, again. I know how it works tho, so bring it on, all ya people who love to attack for the sake of attacking something you can disprove or dispute fractions of simply for the sake of excitement and self-worth. Guess what, that's an addiction, too, learned over a long time. See if you can do the research and figure out what chemical and action/reaction logical group it's based on, and easy to repair. Oh, and for the record, I'm also aware of the number of people that will get pissed and want to deny it based on their desire to be the winner. Oh, and there are those who love to take the fact that I just pointed that out and claim that it never existed and they were just fine with what I said. Some of the ones who understood what I said and agree will lose interest in responding because they don't want to be analyzed whether they are intelligent or not. There are those who will read and agree and reply. There are those who will read that I'm expecting replies of any type and no reply at all and refuse to reply simply to avoid which they are. Other are bored out of their mind, by reading my analysis and understanding of the Human mind. OOOOH, some want to respond now because they do

    6. Re:P.T. Barnum Had it Right by tyrus568 · · Score: 1

      While your post is a bit snarky, I mostly agree. However, you said this:

      "Quitting was easy when it came to nicotine. I quit cold-turkey and had life suck for about a month and a quarter."

      Calling something easy that has a 97% failure rate is just wrong. According to Wikipedia:

      "Research in Western countries has found that approximately 3-5% of quit attempts succeed using willpower alone (Hughes et al., 2004)."

      It goes on to say that "The typical effort of a person that finally succeeds is the seventh to fifteenth try."

      Sure, my mother quit a ten year pack-a-day habit on her first attempt. My father's trial, however, was much more brutal. I smoke myself a pack a day and find it as difficult to control as an opiate addiction.

      Nicotine addiction is no joke, and just because you quit on your first attempt with nothing but willpower alone is an interesting anecdote, but flies in the face of what we know of smoking addictions today.

    7. Re:P.T. Barnum Had it Right by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Amen, bro. F'real.

      Clarification: was referring to the analysis of the operation and using existing information to assist. In my case, I knew that it was going to "suck" to quit smoking because of the numbers. The opposite in my case is the fact that I have the lovely (and horrid) disorder of Asperger's. Logic alone helped me understand what I was feeling and why; I could therefore displace myself from those feelings and convert them to objects in the mental sense, e.g. calling a friend or family member for a five minute conversation that started with "DAMNIT!!!!!"

      Converting the "need fer-a-smoke" to an object (in the sense applicable) of a word or action like walking outside to my smoke spot, and then walking to the other side of the building, entering a different doorway than the one I exited from. It actually worked (distraction and neural growth). Will it work for everyone? Simple logic: heyl no. Just did for me.

      You've hit on my major problem with people in terms of communication, which leads to my Human relationship dysfunction as a whole... I can verbally explain logic and disconnect from emotion when speaking to an individual that has the ability to concur AND the patience on top of that. That's quite a rare and lucky situation for me to be in. Hence, I'm a talker. Add to that the speed and DEEP analysis I follow logical trails of and you've got me saying things that don't make sense to people because they're following their own paths (or just attacking and trying to win what I don't look at as an argument, but they do).

      I'm babbling again. What I was getting at is that I can help people get through the rough if they want the help, but that's a can of worms that isn't going to he opened without the worms turning into hornets. Chew on that one ;) Communication with me is a good and distracting event, so I might be helpful, but that also requires trust that I have "the answer," if you will.

      I speak when I have something I see as useful, but you know how Humans talk and relate. I just end up laughing in the end. You'd be surprised without spending a LOT of time with me and watching it, but you oughtta see how many people yell at me and argue, calling me an ass, idiot, loser, whatever. In the end, a rough 80% of those people end up succeeding by using what I was talking to them about.

      That's one thing laughter comes from, especially because I don't consider myself superior at all. There's another one to chew on.

      I'm wasting your time now if you're still reading, so I'll shut up. Thanks for the nice reply and additional variable/information! :)))

  27. ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironic would be if Microsoft employees were less likely to be addicted to the internet than others. Come to think of it, maybe after the frustration of having to surf the web with IE all day, their addiction cures itself. In that case, it would be ironic to build a center next door.

  28. I'm checking myself in... by y_axis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    right after BlizzCon.

  29. So... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    How much does a fatal beating go for? Are the prices competitive, or should I import one from china?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's their cure for addiction I think I'll keep my 15 grand and *suffer*

    2. Re:So... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      You made my day. No, week. :D

  30. Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by reporter · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    This so-called Internet addition is really pornography addition.

    After reading the previous statement, most Slashdotters just uttered a "heh" in cynical agreement. Pornographic images and video have the largest percentage (although it may not necessarily exceed 50%) of Internet bandwidth.

    The interesting question to ask is whether the Internet-addiction clinic charges more than a sex-addiction clinic. The addict should attend the clinic that costs less -- assuming that the addict even acknowledges a problem.

    Note that the American clinic is addressing an issue differing from that addressed by the Chinese clinic. The Chinese clinic is addressing a non-sex issue since, in theory, pornography is not allowed on the Chinese Internet.

    1. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of the Internet-addicted may be porn addicts, but I'd wager a significant percentage of them are MMORPG addicts (most notably WoW). There are plenty of stories out there of people so addicted to that game, and others like it, that they suffer many of the same consequences (loss of family, job, etc) that hardcode substance abusers do.

      Rather than focus on pornography, or even the Internet, I would focus more on addictive behaviors in general. Some people are simply more prone to addiction than others, and will become addicted to any number of things. Organizations like AA claim to beat addiction, but what they really do is redirect the addiction to less harmful (in theory) pursuits. So, many recovering addicts become heavy coffee drinkers, or heavy smokers, or get really big into religion (God addiction?).

      A particular "XYZ Addiction" program may be useful to XYZ addicts because it puts them in with a group of people suffering from the same addiction, and maybe they can draw some support from each other. The ultimate goal of any of them, though, is simply to try and redirect the addictive tendencies toward less harmful addictions.

    2. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Seumas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They should have a service like this for religious people. Religious nutcase addicts are far more dangerous than some dude that plays warcraft all day or something.

    3. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Desler · · Score: 1

      And the only thing the dude who spanks it too much in a day is going to cause is maybe the local grocery store runs out of tissues.

    4. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by agnosticanarch · · Score: 1

      They should have a service like this for religious people. Religious nutcase addicts are far more dangerous than some dude that plays warcraft all day or something.

      Damn, I wish I had mod points.

      Mod parent all the way up to eleven!!

      ~AA

      --
      I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
    5. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I'd wager a significant percentage of them are MMORPG addicts (most notably WoW).

      Hah that's ridiculous, I'm not addicted, kekekekeke...

    6. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Troll

      Organizations like AA claim to beat addiction, but what they really do is redirect the addiction to less harmful (in theory) pursuits. So, many recovering addicts become heavy coffee drinkers, or heavy smokers, or get really big into religion (God addiction?)

      [Citation Needed]

      Wow. Ummm. Wow. AA so dose not just redirect the addictive behaviors to something else. That is what some do who go to the meetings but do not follow the program. That though is not the teachings of the program or their aim.

      Knowledge is better than pretending you have some.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    7. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Dangerous to the freedoms of others. Though religion addicts usually do usually less harm to themselves than MMORPG addicts.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    8. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Gorobei · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the program is ideal. Screw $1,500 of kayaking - think $15,000 of "exotic roleplaying." Man, this spa thing could be a winner - 45 days at a hotel-like spa with outside activities? Set it up right and Blue Cross will even pay for it.

      I am so there! Sorry, boss, I need 45 days off to cure my internet addiction - I'll be kayaking, deep-sea fishing, and TFing hookers. No prob, I hate to do it, but it's the only way to reconnect with reality. Oh, and you are paying, don't make me invoke the "Americans with disabilities" law.

    9. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Goaway · · Score: 1

      And in English?

    10. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey Stalin, ever heard of the first amendment?

    11. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by turing_m · · Score: 1

      Pornographic images and video have the largest percentage (although it may not necessarily exceed 50%) of Internet bandwidth.

      If it's only 50%, what's the rest of the internet used for? Porn would have to be the most bandwidth intensive activity per time spent of anything on the internet (except folding perhaps). Files on the order of 1GB get downloaded to be looked at for probably half an hour. Maybe several hours for someone's absolute favorites. The majority will be looked at for a couple minutes and never looked at again. I wouldn't be surprised if family photos/video gets more viewing time spent per MB than porn.

      Multiplayer games, MMORPGs, forums such as this one, news, random research/surfing, youtube, messaging, those are the addictions.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    12. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey Stalin, ever heard of the first amendment?

      Hey Limbaugh, please explain how helping people recover from a dangerous psychological disorder is either "an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    13. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely. My brother and his wife are pathetically addicted to the internet and those stupid popcap games. They spend hours reading about crap they dont care about (cracked, stumble, digg) while their 4 kids run around screaming. None of it is porn related.

    14. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by plopez · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pornographic images and video have the largest percentage (although it may not necessarily exceed 50%) of Internet bandwidth.

      there are other uses for the internet? ;)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    15. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seumas said: They should have a service like this for religious people. So, in his world, if you're a religious person (any kind - he didn't add any qualifiers), you get put in a "treatment center". That sure sounds like prohibiting free exercise to me.

    16. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      "A service like this for religious people" would be a private clinic offering big-bucks treatment to cure "religion addiction." Nobody (AFAIK) is getting forced into the treatment being discussed in TFA, so by extension, they wouldn't be forced into the religion treatment either. Whether such a service would be of any use is arguable, of course, but it wouldn't constitute a government infringement on individual rights.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    17. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by billcopc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're all pretty much guessing here, so I will present my best educated guess. IANAPsychologist, I only took Psych classes to get chicks...

      First of all, just because someone spends a lot of time doing one thing, that does not make them an addict. To be addicted to something, you have to feel drawn to it against your will, it must be an overwhelming urge. You know the old saying "I can quit any time I want, just not today"... that's addiction! If the very idea of stopping is a stressful thought, it's addiction. If you play WoW 16 hours a day because you enjoy it, and have nothing better to do, it's just a perfectly normal hobby. Have fun and please don't grief me!

      If a person is truly addicted to something, drugs/sex/internet/anything, to a degree where it can be considered harmful, chances are the obsessive behaviour is a way to escape some stressful element in their life. Addiction is a symptom, a coping mechanism. You don't treat the symptom, you treat the cause.

      A few years ago, one would have said I was addicted to WoW. I played it 16 hours a day, did almost nothing else. I wasn't addicted to a game, I was burnt out from a soulless job, broke and depressed out of my skull; the game was a way to shunt that negativity aside and keep from going batshit insane. It provided the cheap on-demand gratification I needed to stay out of the dumps, and by that definition it was successful. It floated me through a few rough months and gave me time to deal with my issues.

      In light of that, I believe these so-called internet addiction camps can only cause more harm. To charge that amount of money, for what equates to six weeks of adult summer camp, is to prey on the weak. It does not address the underlying problem at all. An "internet addict" would be better served by a psychologist/therapist, and for that kind of money you could see your therapist twice weekly for a whole year, which is extreme overkill. You'll probably be cured after a dozen sessions or so, but "cure" isn't the right word, I prefer "empowered", because the change has to come from within. A therapist helps you map out the path, but you have to take that step toward self-respect and self-control.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    18. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Do you know anything at all about 12 step programs ?

      Have you studied data on recidivism rates for 12 step program "graduates" ?

      Do you think artificial guilt is an effective tool to address deeply-rooted psychological issues ?

      Do you actually think people behave the same way at an AA meeting, as they would outside the confines of an authority-based, peer-pressure microcosm ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    19. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      helping people recover from a dangerous psychological disorder

      If this were a well-recognized disorder, wouldn't it be desireable for the proprietors have well-recognized and relevant credentials for helping with that disorder? The way this spins, it seems that they are focussing on one particular outlet of a dangerous disorder. However, it also seems like amateurs trying to help themselves to money from weak-minded individuals (they'll be professionals at that if they succeed here).

      The money would be better spent backpacking through Europe.

    20. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 1

      Since people who are "addicted" to religion (the correct word is "belief", not "addiction") do not consider themselves to have a problem, nobody would ever go to such a clinic voluntarily.

    21. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Entropic+Alchemist · · Score: 1

      there are other uses for the internet? ;)

      Most of the rest of it is taken up by Slashdot

      --
      Remember the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Let the Lord of Chaos Rule
    22. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      I don't know about all chapters of AA, but from what I have seen they can be quite harmful... My mother was a heavy drink and then a heavy user of prescription opiates. She finally was in such poor condition that she checked herself in, went through a 2 week detox, and left the clinic with a prescription of Suboxone, a therapist, a psychiatrist, and heavy encouragement to attend one of several AA (It is alcoholics anonymous but they pretty much welcome all substance abusers) clubs in the area.

      AA members take on "Sponsers"...someone who has been sober for a year or more. My mom was sponsored by a nurse 15 years younger then her who was also addicted to pain killers and had been attending AA for two years. A month into it I met the sponser for the first time. Within a minute of meeting her I knew she was higher than a kite. Two weeks later, sponser was in jail for writing herself scripts for oxycontin. Her second sponsor was a woman 4 years clean from alcohol. She started taking my mom down to the Casino where they both continually lost thousands of dollars and both became horribly addicted to gambling. That sponsor flew off the deep end so my mom decided she would try a male sponsor. He tried to sexually assault her. It came out he had assaulted about 9 AA newcomers in the last 5 years. He faked an alcohol addiction to attend meetings to feed his sex addiction. Four years later, my mom is clean of drugs but her life is pretty messed up overall.

      Sometimes I wonder if it is such a good idea to bring people who have self destructive tendencies in this manner. I imagine when people leave the Internet Addiction Camp that they will be encouraged to keep in touch with others whom they have met there in order to support each other. I can't think of a better way to do this offhand but establishing a support network of people with severe problems seems to be a recipe for disaster. On one hand you might have "Bob over there has stayed away from the Internet/Drugs/Alcohol...If he can do it so can I!"....but on the other you have "Bob confided in me that he has started playing WoW again but has it under control. I'll start playing and make sure to moderate my time just like bob!

    23. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      What is so special about 12 steps? That's a completely arbitrary number.

      Here's my 2-step program:

      1. Stop feeding the addiction
      2. Find a healthy substitute

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    24. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Ever stop to think that, MAYBE, just PERHAPS, the escapist behavior is... wait for it... and escape from the 4 screaming children?

      Birth control. Learn it, use it, love it.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    25. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AA so dose not just redirect the addictive behaviors to something else.

      This anecdotal, but I've never seen an AA meeting that wasn't at a church and didn't have a LOT of heavy smokers hanging out outside afterwards. YMMV.

    26. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you douche bag

    27. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What does AA do? It tells you that you're not to blame for your addiction (you're powerless over alcohole, drugs, whatever), it tells you to put your life/fate into the hands of some higher being (probably named so because you couldn't mandate people to go to AA by court if they still said "God" in there), go to the people you wronged and attone for your sins (yeah, that's really gonna boost your self esteem and keep you from guzzling some more to forget about it) and hang out with ex druggies who may or may not have stopped (yeah, yeah, they claim they did), or may have picked up another addiction to compensate.

      What kind of "therapy" is that? It doesn't address the main reason for addiction at all: A lack of something. It may help those that lack some sort of "spirituality" in their life, but people who're burned out, miserable with their life and generally aimless (but who also call the whole spirituality baloney what it is) will not find anything.

      Except maybe a different addiction to waste their time and life with.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't mind religious people. I know a few people who are devout Christians. I also know a few people who're really into Islam. The funny thing is that they get along pretty well. And why not? I mean, both believe in one god with probably slightly different hairdo (we'll never know, after all neither may draw pictures of him) and they call him by different names.

      They're no problem. Enjoy and live and do whatever your favorite pastime may be. Mine is hacking virtual beings, yours is worshipping one, no harm in either. I also don't mind if you run around telling everyone how cool your imaginary friend is.

      It stops being cool when people go around beating up people or worse in the name of their imaginary friend, because they claim he doesn't like what they're doing. It's kinda odd to see laws being passed based on the ideas of your imaginary friend. I mean, just because Harvey here thinks it's cool to force everyone to eat carrots on Sundays, I can't go around cramming orange vegetables down everyone's throat and, when (rightfully) arrested, claim it was Harvey's idea and thus should be law.

      Freedom of speech, fine. Freedom to force your views onto me to limit mine, not fine.

      He didn't talk about religious people. They're ok. If that's what you need to enjoy your life, more power to you. Enjoy it. He was talking about religious nutjobs. Which is, at least by my standards, anyone who deems it right to force the behaviour which is "right" according to his religion on other who couldn't care less what some God or Goddess or Spirit or whatever wants.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You might have heard of people blowing themselves to hell and back because someone told them it's a spiffy idea and pleases some God. I mean, how much more self harm can you inflict on yourself than to turn your body into fine, red mist?

      Even the most zealous MMO addict didn't nuke their home because the lost the Sword of Superspecialawesomeness.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if family photos/video gets more viewing time spent per MB than porn.

      They sure get shown more. I highly doubt they get looked at more.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

      The Drinkers are smoking; the smokers are drinking; and the gamblers are sleeping with anything that moves! - Marge Simpson

      --
      "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    32. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Presumably, the GP is talking about a non-government program. Indeed, the first amendment is perhaps the very thing to allow this to exist in USA. They might call it a hate crime program elsewhere (despite its actual goals).

    33. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      You got this ass-backwards. You think suited g-men will grab you in the middle of the night and "you get put in"? No, this would be a private clinic that you choose to put yourself into.

      In the US, we are guaranteed a right to free speech. This includes a right to speak out against religion, or assemble clinics whose purpose is to cure people of religion. It's one of the few ways in which US remains more advanced than the old world, where the operators would probably be convicted of hate crimes.

    34. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by plopez · · Score: 1

      touche'

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    35. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you know the difference between

      "If you play WoW 16 hours a day because you enjoy it, and have nothing better to do, it's just a perfectly normal hobby."

      and

      "I can quit any time I want, just not today"

      Those two statments sound like they could come from the same person.

      "I can quit smoking pot any time I want but it's so much fun and what else am I going to? Maybe I'ld find out if i quit, but not today."

      I get your point but 16 hours per day sounds like an extreme example. If someone plays WOW 16 hours per day that's definately an addiction. There's no way that anyone has so little to do that they have time for 16 hours of WOW. That person is missing out on a lot of living.

    36. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      You can't invoke ADA to get addiction treatment HOWEVER some private health insurance does cover it. Whether internet addiction counts I do not know.

    37. Re:Internet Addition = Pornography Addition by Gorobei · · Score: 1

      Oops, my boss going be really pissed about my "drying out" trip to Little Palm Island :(

  31. Yo, Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    testing 1 2 3

  32. Internet Addiction by lobiusmoop · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  33. Is there Wifi? by speedtux · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm only going if it has free Wifi in the rooms.

  34. Author has bad programming skills by 32771 · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    >Certainly the wrong way to help is to tell someone with a problem to do the 2-Step Program:
    >
    >Step 1. Turn the computer off and go outside.
    >
    >Step 2. Repeat Step 1.

    If you are already on the outside and the computer is off, how do you repeat step 1 ? This is certainly wrong, but for what reason?

    The australian car rental people I met once were much better. I asked them for some hints about driving on the left side, they just said "do that and stay there". It worked.

    --
    Je me souviens.
  35. Re:Do they have free WiFi in the rooms? by Magycian · · Score: 1

    I heard it was.... Dial Up....

  36. I can get this for free by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

    just by not paying my Verizon bill.

    --
    Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
  37. Why is this tagged with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... 'shakawhenthewallsfell' ?

    Despite that this is a reference to one of the greatest Next Generation episodes ever, I'm not sure I see the connection.

    1. Re:Why is this tagged with... by paazin · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to Memory Alpha:

      "Shaka, when the walls fell" - failure

      So, my guess it's just generic Star Trek geek for 'epic fail'

    2. Re:Why is this tagged with... by Thyamine · · Score: 1

      I was wondering this exact thing when I came in. Glad I'm not the only one scratching his head.

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
  38. American E-Pie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One time, at Internet Addiction Camp.....

    1. Re:American E-Pie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stuck a keyboard in your goatse?

  39. *SELL* shashdot at by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

    Strange, I got a 404

  40. just need an IP enabled boxing glove or taser(tm) by be99 · · Score: 1

    Just need a remote controlled boxing glove (ala jackass 2) or a modified shock collar. When someone goes somewhere they don't need to go, they either get hit or shocked. problem solved. Set up a website, charge other people a fee to "press the button" and you've just covered your costs with little to no personnel and it'll run itself, so you can do a good service AND still play WoW. (or my soon to be downfall, quakelive.). anyone who does this company, I want 1% of profits so I can retire.

  41. Coke Comparison by allometry · · Score: 1

    If RSS Feeds are like coke, then I've gone through an 8-ball already.

    --
    http://www.allometry.com
  42. What? by scribblej · · Score: 1

    Why don't we send people who talk on the phone all day to telephone addiction treatment centers?

    Oh, right, that would be stupid.

  43. That's nice and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..but are the mortal beatings free?

  44. Internet Addiction iPhone App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an app called "Disconnect with Andrew Johnson" on the iPhone app store. You can use technology to beat your addiction. http://bit.ly/DisCon

  45. I reserve judgement -- let's see the results. by smackenzie · · Score: 1

    Sure, this crowd is going to push back a lot. And it's prime material for jokes. But, in short, a lot of web addicts have underlying problems of which excessive use of the internet is really a symptom. People get legitimately addicted to all kinds of things, and the internet happens to be a completely ubiquitous, invasive entity... so I'll be curious to see if this group is capable of weeding through this primary symptom with an eye towards lower-level issues.

    At the most extreme end of the spectrum -- and sometimes that's all an addiction is, normal behavior taking to an extreme -- they'll have to deal with people who might use the internet to escape all human interaction, who always use pornography in lieu of meaningful relationships, who have trouble separating fantasy violence from real life situations in which violence has consequences, who have general-category neurological issues like autism, aspergers syndrome, etc.

    On one hand, in light of this, a kayak trip is a joke. On the other hand, sometimes these things are all it take to get people thinking about bigger issues, especially if they can be directed to long-term, more appropriately fine-tuned help.

  46. How much extra... by LabRat007 · · Score: 2

    ...to be beaten to death?

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    1. Re:How much extra... by xednieht · · Score: 1

      Probably an arm and a leg...

      --

      Hope is the currency of fools
  47. Okay, but for 14 grand.... by Itninja · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ....do I at least get wifi in my room?

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  48. Re:I have my own internet addiction treatment cent by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    But how does the cost compare?

  49. HUH? by anglico · · Score: 1

    If you have that kind of money to waste on this 'addiction' cure wouldn't it be cheaper to just hire a therapist? I just can't see how somebody would pay that much to cure what so many generations survived without? We'll say it's a teenager forced by their parents to go here, it would still be cheaper to just take time off of work and supervise the kid for a long period of time. Maybe the parent will learn something in the process that probably got their kid 'addicted' in the first place.

  50. Dr. Mario? by terrence.donnelly · · Score: 1

    Help I have an NES addiction!

  51. The articles author is an insensitive clod !!! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
    FTA:

    "Hi, my name is Michael. (Your reply: "Hi, Michael"). And I have a problem with the Internet."

    No, no, no you insensitive clod ! I'm a recovering Internet addict. I don't click on "reply" anymore, and especially not "Reply All" ...

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  52. Right. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Can I get a room with decent wireless?

    Seriously, though: if you need 45 days to break your addiction to the web, for quite a bit lower sum you could just go get a tent and hang out in the Boundary Waters for 45 days.

    I *guarantee* that you would come back and while you might enjoy reconnecting to the web again, none of the virtual world would seem nearly as important as before you left.

    --
    -Styopa
  53. Hmmmm by twistah · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of Internet connection they have there?

  54. visit the company's site by lissianna · · Score: 1

    Its interesting that if you visit the companies website they list their social networking connections.... Think about that. If they are going to cure you of your internet addiction - do they really want people following them on facebook, twitter or their blog?

  55. Book addiction centers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this story on another site yesterday, and when I told my wife about it she laughed and asked if there were any book addiction centers. As soon as she mentioned this I realized that I ALWAYS need a book in my possession at all times. I need to read before I can go to sleep, or else I will lie awake for hours. Sometimes, if I have a good book, I will stay up late to read it, and then be tired the next day. I actively avoid using speed reading techniques, as this would increase my expenditures on books, which are already high enough.

    I now believe that the only reason that their aren't book addiction centers is that reading never became popular enough with dumb people for them to blame books for their troubles.

    1. Re:Book addiction centers by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Too bad this is an AC post. Mod it up anyway though mods.

  56. Definition of "addiction" for Americans by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 4, Funny

    ad . dic . tion, n.: The state or practice of engaging in an activity that does not earn money for one's boss. See antonymns at "well-adjusted" and "slave."

    1. Re:Definition of "addiction" for Americans by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      s/boss/government/;s/slave/serf/
      They mandate these programs for parolees now (well not for internet addiction but you get my point.

  57. So by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    Spend roughly $17,000 on a retarded camp for morons. "No FUCKING Thank You"

    I would rather take that entire sum go to Vegas and have some real fun and blog and tweet about it the whole 45 days

    1. Re:So by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Spend roughly $17,000 on a retarded camp for morons. "No FUCKING Thank You"

      I would rather take that entire sum go to Vegas and have some real fun and blog and tweet about it the whole 45 days

      If you can make $17,000 last 45 days in Vegas you're clearly not having enough fun.

    2. Re:So by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

      damn you're right that would only last me about two weeks at the most

  58. First American Internet Addiction Treatment Center by Shooter28 · · Score: 1

    Let's hope it's also the last.

  59. Not the same everywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet China internet addiction beats YOU!

  60. Kayaking? by Eowaennor · · Score: 1

    Why actually go outside and get wet and risk drowning when I can use Google Maps to take a virtual tour of the river from the comfort of my own home! I can even read reviews from actual kayakers on that river and decide for myself if I liked the experience or not.

  61. If it works... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
    Enough with the "I'll go if they have wireless in the rooms" jokes, ok?

    What I want to know is, if this facility is successful, how will /. survive?

  62. Logic 101 Time by orkybash · · Score: 1

    A substantial minority of thing A is actually thing B. From a logical standpoint, there exists an A that is also a B.

    Therefore, all addictions to A are addictions to B. Put another way, if someone is addicted to A, then they are addicted to B.

    Spot the fallacy, kids!

    1. Re:Logic 101 Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot the fallacy, kids!

      OP is a dick?

  63. How about... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Irony...or am I the only one who finds it ironic that an internet addiction centre has a web site?

    1. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Naw, irony would be if they offered classes online.

    2. Re:How about... by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      It actually makes perfect sense. If your customers are internet addicts, put your advertising on the internet. Of course, that ignores whether it's "internet addicts" or their families that are actually going to want this..

    3. Re:How about... by noundi · · Score: 1

      You call that irony? This is irony!

      --
      I am the lawn!
    4. Re:How about... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      My money is on "their family". Or, more specifically, "their parents who know jack about 'this internet thingie'".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  64. No need to even open a retail/service location... by shacky003 · · Score: 1

    The steps to cure yourself of any Internet addiction:
    1. Send me all the money in your bank accounts
    2. Send me a monthly check for all the money you make to pay for your continued cure...
    3. Thank me endlessly for curing you.

    You will never have your own internet access again, AND I've cured you of that pesky having a home/apartment thing as well!

    For a limited time, that extra service is free!

  65. Addiction is possible in almost any activity by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Anything can be done in excess, or can be neglected. Either to the point where we become dependent on the activity, or afraid of a situation, is bad because we change our lives to fit that to the detriment of our regular lives, had it not been affected by the activity. Therefore the activity controls us, and not the other way around. This can be done with anything, not just the internet, drugs, food, TV, and collecting garbage apparently. People who let it get to a certain point are too messed up emotionally to think rationally about it. They have become habituated and dependent on it. These people need help, no matter what the activity. It's unfortunate that it's so expensive and so specialized, hopefully eventually we will move on.

  66. Addiction vs Adaptation by mindbrane · · Score: 1

    Addiction and adaptation are two concepts that play well off one another. Addiction has been likened to being in a dissociative state wherein, the addict confuses the gas pedal with the break. Adaptation is generally an characteristic that aides in survival and reproduction. Mammals, such as ourselves, developed hearing ranges and vocalizations that were keen adaptations. Overall, animals seem to develop communication adaptations specific to their kind, and such adaptations appear to have paid off. Social communication, speech and, most recently, writing are the hallmarks of our species. Along with bipedal locomotion they pretty much define us. The Internet is (was) a highly sophisticated communication channel, an extension of the core characteristics that allow us to dominate the planet. Practised, frequent, even habitual use of the Internet is characteristic of a progressive, well adapted person. The degradation of other, more antiquated communications skills, isn't a big issue as those skills are nearly universally reinforced and at hand should they again become the dominant, more sophisticated mode of communication. People "addicted" to the Internet are maladapted, but not in the way they think they are.

    --
    ideopath @ play
  67. 24 years of internet access by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    You can pay $14,500 for treatment, or pay for 24 years of internet access.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  68. I am so in the wrong line of work... by shrtcircuit · · Score: 1

    You mean to tell me I can seriously charge people $15K just to show them how to get a life?

    I am building an Internet Addict detention center in my basement as we speak! I'll let them out for play time twice a day and occasional feedings, as long as they mow the lawn and clean the kitchen. Plus the extra money should help me get a DS3 dropped in so I can surf 24x7 in style.

  69. Ironic? by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

    That is not ironic.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  70. Pffft by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

    I'm not addicted. I just find everything else in life less entertaining.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    1. Re:Pffft by tyrus568 · · Score: 1

      You joke, but this is exactly what people who quit serious addictions go through. Everything in life pales in comparison to the addictive behavior. Over time this usually gets better as the reward pathways in the brain rewire themselves, but anyone with a serious drug dependency will tell you that life really, really sucks without having what they feel they need.

    2. Re:Pffft by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      I'm not really joking. It's not the internet, but I'd pretty much always, at any time, rather be playing video games. Not any particular one, I'm not a WoW addict. Just anything from TF2, to Fallout 3, Supremem Commander, etc. I'll be out at a bar with friends, counting the minutes until I leave so I can go home and put arrows through Scouts' heads in TF2 instead. I find 'normal life' immensely dull and boring. The only reason I go out is to keep up appearances and not look like as big of a loser as I really am.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  71. Taking the lead? by dissy · · Score: 1

    Taking their lead from China, two Americans have opened the first US-based Internet Addiction treatment center in Fall City, Wash.

    I wonder how much they charge for a beating that results in death?
    We might have some catch-up to do, as it seems china includes that service in their base fee ;P

  72. Those fools used Joomla to build their site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suckers. They should have used Drupal! Drupal rocks! Totally!

    I spend a LOT of time with Drupal. I love it! Ummm. Uh oh.

    But Joomla? Good grief. Why should I trust this internet health center again?

  73. First US Internet Addiction Treatment Center?? by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

    Oh, really? Well, maybe it's the first one with its own social network. Hmmm, I wonder where I can find an AA group with their own bar?

    --
    "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
  74. WoW has wanton use of Weapons. Who's dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Porno just teaches one repetive maneuver that doesn't scale into weapons well, unless it's a small stabbing action with a knife. WoW is giant chatroom where everyone gets together and willfully injures another single or group of people. Those 2nd-amendment kids out there all studied their rifle and handguns, were disciplined in the safe and effective usage, and acknowledge the 3 stages of boastfullness so that the would know the origin of violence and how to be peaceful and honoured societies as to not escalating most disputes to a dead end. As a result of WoW, people develop opinions, get dummer, and ackowledge a weapon as the only easy way to achieve Gain.

    And here in the United States everyone blaims the gun, even Obama, even Democrats and Republicans. Blame shallow perceptions of social interaction. Don't blame the fart, don't blame the beans, blame the undiscplined man that dealt it.

    Porno teaches a well-rounded man how to use his or her genetitals; for the shallow mind, those matters of perception are not in sight but the perception of an entertainable activity.

    1. Re:WoW has wanton use of Weapons. Who's dangerous? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      As a result of WoW, people develop opinions, get dummer

      So, who's your main?

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  75. While there, if you do go Kayaking by Grendol · · Score: 1
    Well, if you do spend time in Fall City, when kayaking or canoeing, go upstream and put in on the Snoqualmie river at the turbine house just past the base of the falls. It is a nice half day float, but don't bother going much downstream of Fall City as the river gets really slow to almost being stagnant and winds around forever before you get to Tolt River Park at Carnation.

    Having been there, Fall City probably needs an AA program more than it needs a internet addiction program

  76. Now for registration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please visit www.......

  77. hmm by cti · · Score: 1

    First they came for the pr0n junkies, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a pr0n junkie.
    Then they came for the SecondLifers, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a SecondLifer.
    Then they came for the WoW nerds, and I didn't speak up, because I was into EverQuest.
    Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me.

  78. Re:I have my own internet addiction treatment cent by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

    Yet which costs more?

  79. if they succeed by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    I'll open a kayaking addiction center nearby.

  80. Washington law prevents forced treatment for teens by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

    See here. I wonder if these clowns know that. I'd hate to see these profiteering zealots run afoul of the law.ï

  81. Xenu is cheaper by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    You can get Scientology for cheaper. At least the first couple sessions.

  82. I live too far away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...do they have online classes?

  83. What do you suggest then? by Alarindris · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing a lot of ignorant posts in this thread about the cost and 'easier' solutions.

    First off, the standard 28 days for a drug addiction costs much more than $15,000.

    Secondly, I saw a post saying "Cancel. Your. Internet. Service." Would you tell a drug addict to just stop buying drugs?

    Maybe being addicted to the internet is not a true addiction. But short of LOLDONTGOONTHEWEB what else would you people suggest for someone with a problem?

    1. Re:What do you suggest then? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Get the help of a psychiatrist. Not some self help group, not some self proclaimed expert, not some internment camp.

      A good shrink will instead try to find out the reason for your addiction (usually it's the lack of something, be it fulfilment, love or anything else your psyche lacks), find out how to counter that reason and then help you find a way to overcome it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  84. Sure I'm addicted but... by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

    at least I can ignore stupid crap without hurting peoples feelings like I would have to do if I were in a live setting with them.

    Blah Blah Blah!

    Oh sorry I wasn't listening to your wharrgarbl once you mentioned [insert random irrelevant event here].

    Own my own house, hate cheetos, do not have a basement.

    Feel free to ignore this. I know I would.

  85. Obligatory jerkcity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  86. For that money... by ReadParse · · Score: 1

    I would certainly hope they have good WiFi

  87. Re:A far more effective way to deal with this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the new here, what was trollish in this post?

  88. Re:I have my own internet addiction treatment cent by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Outdoors? Kinky!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  89. Re: coutless hours on the internet by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I have. I'm addicted. Do I want to be cured? Are you effing kidding?

    I make my money that way. How many new trojans have I found aimlessly surfing up and down the 'net? How many "firsts" I got are due to this? How many contracts came out of them? Honestly, if you want to separate me and the net, my golden-egg-laying goose, make sure your nuts are kick-proof!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  90. Wifi Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd like to think for $15k that they'll include WiFi during your stay...

  91. Come to my place! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Come over, I can charge you 1000$ per month, for room and board and give you a pool to swim in, and give you exercises to do, and I have no internet, so there would be no real temptation, in fact ANYONE GOING ON VACATION would not have any temptations either, and would be much cheaper then taking off a month, AND paying someone 15,000$!!!

  92. Re:Follow them! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Wait, so they pay to be on the Truman Show?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  93. For that much money by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    They better provide FiOS!!

  94. Combine it with fat camp by Beerdood · · Score: 1

    For $15000 I have a program that will cure your kid's internet addiction. I give your kid $200 in cash and they get sent to Libya or Chad for 45 days (accommodations and utilities paid for). Kid has to decide whether to spend the money on food or internet. Spends it all on food? Hey, he hasn't used internet for 45 days, he's cured. Spent most of it on finding and paying for internet? Then he's probably lost some weight from being malnourished, and the painfully slow dial up has at least hindered his online activity. Spent it all on internet and died of starvation? Chances are you never had any time to talk with him anyway since he's plugged in all day, and you've done the world a favor by preventing his uber-dorkness from remaining in the gene pool. Assuming he would have actually gotten a chance to procreate some time in his life.

    --
    Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  95. 15,000 just won't cut it! by bluetigerbc · · Score: 1

    Well I don't think "investing" in 15,000 bucks would stop my Internet "habit". Sure I can quit any time I want to but WHY??? Is normal life "happier" then virtual life? Is being online helping or hurting? Why shun yourself from MILLIONS of people/news/info/websites/porn/games/people to talk /w? I'd be like paying to be celebate! (no sex like nuns!) Ya, I really like sex so I decided to give it up! Can I also take a rod from the filthy power plants to keep around? I heard they are warm. (fucking idiots). C-O-U-N-T-E-R P-R-O-D-U-C-T-I-V-E! =P