Game Over For Sony and Open Source?
Glyn Moody writes "Sony has never been much of a friend to hackers, and its infamous rootkit showed what it thought of users. But by omitting the option to install GNU/Linux on its new PS3, it has removed the final reason for the open source world to care about Sony. Unless, of course, you find Google's new distribution alliance with Sony to pre-install Chrome on its PCs exciting in some way."
Buy a damned computer, or one of the mobiles you can install Linux on.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
It didn't sell them any significant number of new PS3's. That they did it for the first generation was fine, but it's not a contract they signed in blood.
RTFA. Sony has chosen not to maintain the Hypervisor for the new hardware. You can still run linux on the old systems, and they do not plan to disable that feature. This isn't open source hate, it's a practical business decision by a company that loses money every time they sell a console. They made the console cheaper.
Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
Why on /earth/ would Sony care about Linux on PS3's?
And honestly, for the great majority of users, why on earth would you bother putting Linux on a PS3 (aside from 'because I can' and scientific stuff, for which there are better solutions and more interesting challenges), except to pirate games?
I'm having a really hard time finding out why I'm supposed to be as outraged as the tone of this suggests I should be.
... PS3 Slim won't run PS2 discs
... it has removed the final reason for the open source world to care about Sony.
I thought ImageWorks (of Sony Pictures) had recently opensourced OSL, Scala Migrations, Field3D, PyString and Maya Reticle or at least made them community endeavors. I can't seem to find the source code for browsing on OSL and some of the other projects are pretty tiny but if that's true it's a good sign on ImageWorks' part.
I'm certain they by and large use GPL LGPL in their products like their TVs and SOE using PostgreSQL over Oracle.
Writing off the PS3? Probably. They probably realized Linux support buys them little over the Wii and XBox360 despite what I and everyone else thinks. But the rest of Sony might have hope.
My work here is dung.
I'm in the "open source world".
Should I stop caring about Burger King because I can't run Linux on a Whopper?
Are you surprised given that Sony has acknowledged it will sell the PS3 slim at a loss?
So yes, they've changed their strategy to boost sales of the new PS3 by selling at a loss and intending to make up the money on game sales. How many people will buy several of these and never play games on them? Probably not too many, but where do you draw the line?
Stop acting like a kid who can't get what he wants.
Given that today's high end graphics cards(e.g. 4870X2) offer far more TFLOPs than the PS3, I fail to see how linux not running on PS3 is a loss for the supercomputing fraternity. Machine for machine, Folding@home gets more computation out of PCs equipped with graphics cards rather than the PS3s. It is just that there are a lot more PS3s involved in Folding@Home than PCs fitted with nice graphics cards, which totals up the PS3 FLOPs beyond the gamer PCs.
The problem is that PS3's are cheaper sources of Cell processors than anything IBM is selling. If you want to set up (at a university say) a research cluster of 4 or 8 Cell based computers for astrophysics, datamining, or the like, it was cheaper to buy PS3's than even consider the IBM bought Cell based servers. But then you weren't buying games, and Sony wasn't getting financial credit for subsidizing academic research (if they donated the equipment it would be a tax write off likely but if you buy it they get nothing, and since they're selling at a loss they only want you to buy if you'll buy games too).
Also, as amusingly geeky as this was, how many of their gaming customers actually bothered? This was never an actual selling feature of the system, they were trying to circumvent EU import tariffs on game consoles that aren't on computers. The EU didn't buy it with the PS2, I doubt they bought it with the PS3.
Of course there are a million machines you can install Linux on
But how many these "million machines" are designed to connect to a standard-definition television? I looked at Best Buy a couple weeks ago and saw a bunch of PCs with VGA and possibly DVI or HDMI outputs but no S-Video. Or by "million machines", are you referring to any original PS3 units that might show up on the second-hand market?
I love my PS3.
I love Linux.
Sony is the only console maker that DID support Linux.
They dropped the support because it was an rarely utilized feature and it was cheaper not to support it on the new model.
I run Linux on all my PCs (2 laptops and 4 desktops) but never installed it on my PS3 (despite having partitioned my upgraded hard drive with room for it). I never felt the need to do so. I run a media server on two of the Linux boxes and I don't need the PS3 to be a 7th general purpose computer when that is not it's intended function as one and not designed for that purpose.
This fanboy of Linux (and fanboy of Sony as well) doesn't care about the dropped support. I thank Sony for all the support up to this point and wish this platform continued success.
After reading that summary and the completely transparent hatred for Sony in it I and forced to say that, yes, Glyn is Moody. ;)
I used to work for Sony developing PS2 games. The number of people I met that cut their teeth writing code on the linux kit before getting into the business was exactly 0. I might have been the only person I knew who even had a modchipped PS2, everybody else just didn't care since they had the PS2Tool on their desk to do development. Sony is probably discontinuing offering Linux because it didn't spark the development push that they had hoped for. Still, I would think this would limit the number of supercomputer clusters that use PS3's. You'd think the marketing benefits of being a platform in the top 100 supercomputers would be valuable, but perhaps Sony is still willing to work with academic institutions to make this possible still.
Perhaps they just haven't had time to rework their Linux HAL for the new hardware?
Have they said "No, Linux will never come to the PS3 Slim"?
The big console makers are sort of Tivo-ization to the Nth degree. They give (or rather sell) you these neat computers and then tell you, "Don't worry your pretty little head about them, We will tell you (or rather, sell you) what you can and can't run on them."
Sony was trying to leverage Linux because they are enemies of Microsoft now. They are also enemies of Free Software, though, so it was a half-hearted "we'll just see what happens if we let people do this," situation. Even though they are selling these great, powerful computers, they still insist on controlling the content on them. That hasn't changed, and won't change because the console model requires it.
So, the whole thing where people would rave about Linux on the PS3 didn't make a lot of sense to me. I feel that as far as making use of a console, the SEGA decision to allow the Dreamcast to boot ordinary CDs was a far bigger deal.
The problem is, the hardware from Sony (and Microsoft, and Nintendo) is all locked down to prevent the power user/hacker/programmer from doing what they want with it. The fact that the might allow some locked down version of Linux on there is beside the point.
"MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
I run Yellow Dog 6.2 on my PS3, and it isn't too bad for web browsing (superior to the PS3 browser) and checking email, among other computing tasks. They crippled access to the full graphics capability of the machine, however, which created a much slower experience that you would expect. Perhaps Sony should put more effort into putting common computing tasks into their XMB... add an email client and improve the browser, at least.
At least Microsoft is friendly to Linux on the XBox and is sending the message that it cares about developers. The XBox is by far the easiest platform to develop for and the most open.
Just summarize the article, don't whine to me about how you don't like Sony. I am able to evaluate actions they take individually. Rootkit = bad. PS3 not supporting linux = good business decision. They are in no way related to each other since this isn't replacing Linux on the PS3 with a rootkit.
And seriously wake up. If you get pissed at Sony for the dumb things they do, then you probably wouldn't buy a product from anyone if you actually paid attention to all the crap that has gone on in each company's history.
Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
I agree. This quote really made me giggle:
Unless they -- I don't know -- like playing console games, like the vast majority of people who buy game consoles. My microwave oven doesn't run Linux, either, but it somehow manages to still be useful to me.
Honestly, I think out-of-touch rants like this only serve to further reinforce the "Linux zealot" stereotype, and drive the mainstream away from Linux.
...who gives a shit. People buy the PS3 for two reasons...to play games and to watch BluRay. I'm sure Sony's stock will plummet once the market finds out that 45 people no longer have a reason to buy a PS3.
Didn't Yellow Dog Linux and its utilities limit the hardware the user could and couldn't access if he wanted to develop? I think that said something about Sony's commitment to basic user freedoms long before this happened.
Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
All Sony has done is reverted to the status quo for game consoles. The Wii and 360 don't allow Linux to be run. While Sony should be praised for including a (mostly gimped) linux option with the PS3, they shouldn't be condemned any more than Nintendo or Microsoft for not including it. I'm not a Sony fan at all.
There's FAR better things to criticize Sony about.
I think you might be misinformed. I installed 3.0 yesterday, and the option is still there.
If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
The hypervisor gave homebrew developers a way to make apps without enabling warez. But now the homebrew community and the warez community are brought back together by the need to find a hack to access the console resources. And once one finds a way in, the other gets it for free, no stopping them.
Linux support seemed like an intelligent way to take a stab at piracy on the cheap, while paying lip-service to Open Source, etc, and getting a tiny amount of street-cred for it. It may be that's not worth the cost to them anymore... we'll see if that turns out to be a mistake or not.
These guys get good results.
Help stamp out iliturcy.
1) "The most proprietary hardware vendor"? Are you serious? Have you ever heard of Apple Corporation?
2) IIRC XP came out a year and a half or so after 2k.
If Windows couldn't autodetect the hardware and make it work, wouldn't that be a Microsoft problem rather than Sony?
If I tried to install Linux on my Sony laptop (which I have) and had driver problems (which I did) I would blame Linux, not Sony. (And my driver problems were all fixed with a minor amount of effort.) There is a sensible argument that manufacturers should help the OSS world by providing specs to make open software support more hardware, but at the same time, that would not be a Sony issue, that would be a problem with the manufacturers of the individual components.
3) Slightly more on topic; Who cares? Sony made what appears to be a sound business decision affecting a very small number of people, relatively speaking. I'm a huge advocate that people should be able to run whatever software on whatever hardware they like, but that doesn't mean that the hardware manufacturer should lose money to continue to support free software for those of us who prefer to use it. It sounds like linux on PS3 was terrible anyway. (though to be fair, I've never tried it)
Censored thread, recovered from mail list backup:
http://playstation2-linux.com/forum/message.php?msg_id=51037
Message: 51037
BY: aragon
DATE: 2009-Aug-21 06:26
SUBJECT: Why no Linux in PS3 Slim?
Hello,
I've found very disgusting the fact of removing the Other OS option in the PS3 Slim model, and the worst: without explanation. In previous cuts, as it was with the PS2 compatibility it was explained that was in order to cut price, removing PS2 CPU chip first, and PS2 graphic and memory subsistem second, which I found acceptable as explanation.
Why? Is being used unencrypted RAM access or similar? Or is just a plain rip-off?
I know that there are many kind people at Sony Computer Entertainment, so please, if possible, give at least a short explanation of why it has been discontinued the Other OS option in the new PS3s.
Thank you in advance,
aragon
P.S. PS2 Linux user since 2002, and since 2007 for the PS3.
P.S.2. I still can not believe it, what a disgrace.
Removed answer and further replies:
Read and respond to this message at: http://playstation2-linux.com/forum/message.php?msg_id=51038
By: sarahe
Hi aragon,
I'm sorry that you are frustrated by the lack of comment specifically regarding the withdrawal of support for OtherOS on the new PS3 slim.
The reasons are simple: The PS3 Slim is a major cost reduction involving many changes to hardware components in the PS3 design. In order to offer the OtherOS install, SCE would need to continue to maintain the OtherOS hypervisor drivers for any significant hardware changes - this costs SCE. One of our key objectives with the new model is to pass on cost savings to the consumer with a lower retail price. Unfortunately in this case the cost of OtherOS install did not fit with the wider objective to offer a lower cost PS3.
We'll see if we can get the offical OtherOS page updated with something to this effect so that an official explanation is provided. Thank you for your comments.
Sarah.
- - - - - - - -
Read and respond to this message at: http://playstation2-linux.com/forum/message.php?msg_id=51039 By: aragon
Thank you very much for the answer, Sarah.
Anyway, if its just a software related point, I hope that it may be addressed in the future, if users request is enough important for making worth the driver update effort.
Best regards,
aragon
- - - - - - - -
Read and respond to this message at: http://playstation2-linux.com/forum/message.php?msg_id=51040
By: f5inet
Thanks for the extra-official explain, sarahe.
could will be possible for SCE to develop and sell a 'PS3-Slim OtherOS license'?. since there is a few wannabe/homebrew projects running in PS3 hardware (the cheapest IBM-cell developer machine), and these projects are dumped to dust with this major revision of PS3-architectur
1. "Final Reason"- so Teh Lunix on a VAIO?
2. "TEH GOOGEL!!!11!!"- how does Google and Chrome somehow equate to good news for open source?
This is one thing I've never been able to understand, but it links in to their whole "everyone who hates Microsoft is a really nice guy, and supporting them is magically good for Teh Open Scarce!!!" mentality. It's bad enough that Linux is already a defacto subsidiary of IBM. And if people don't think so, check into the harsh reality of what would happen if IBM decided to withdraw it's multibillion dollar a year support of Linux development.
I have a CECHE01 PS3 with a Linux install on it, I updated to 3.00 without worrying about losing my ability to boot or install a newer Linux distro. The options are still there and they work, just like I still have the ability to virtual PS2 memory cards and play PS2 games even though PS3's newer than my model can't do that.
Bob:
Hi Sony?
This is Bob.
Remember when we bought 128 PS3s for our cluster?
We need 128 more.
Give us some slims with linux, plz.
Sony:
K.
A lot cheaper than paying Frank to look into getting Linux on a conventional slim.
So... did Sony's site have any "updated drivers" for XP? In my experience, drivers tend to be updated and new versions put on the manufacturer's website.
2000 and XP have a lot in common, including almost the entire driver model. Which is why almost every XP driver also works on Windows 2000.
Incidentally, the same thing is true for Windows Vista and Windows 7.
GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
This headline is dramatic and uninformed. Linux isn't the only open source project out there.
Sony has made huge contributions to the Drupal CMS (Website Content Management System).
They have hired a full-time programmer who is 100% dedicated to open source (CCK/Views modules).
They have sponsored major improvements to Drupal - http://drupal.org/node/383954
Ease up on the rhetoric, before you sour other open-source projects.
Maybe you want to couple your perceived right to hack the PS3 with open source? That's dangerous. Make an open-sourced PS3 and no problem. Mike
the problem looks so much bigger in these fanboi comments; "care about linux"? what are you, linux's father or guardian of some sort? grow up dude, sony makes consoles, not linux-friendly computers so the fanbois can run their own cell clusters. I was as bummed as anyone here about it, but I understand that it was a fairly misguided option from sony when they first enabled it. Their goal is to make more money so you can buy ps4 some 4-5 years from now. everything else is just rubbish. don't like the way they are trying to earn money from their work? open up a hw company, brand it up and make your own god damn linux friendly fanboi console.
In the future Sony will refrain from supporting Linux in anything initially, because they get more flack for not supporting it in all models than do other console makers for never having supported it to begin with.
It's this kind of mean-spirited crap that keeps Open Source as generally a second-class citizen on platforms.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Actually, it was a deciding factor for me, a minor one to be sure. I actually cared more about the PS2 and PS1 compatibility. But I was one of those with a PS2 Linux kit and that things hard drive was going to fail eventually. As you said, running Linux on it is a nice extra that lets me read my e-mail, post to slashdot, play nethack, edit my pictures, and chat on IM and IRC.
No traditional Linux neckbeard for me though, I actually don't want my facial hair, but that...is another story. :-)
Sony did officially support Linux. They had a website for the PS3, that told you how to go about doing it and how it's a supported feature for the PS3. They sold a kit for the PS2 that let you install Linux on it and still maintain the PS2 Linux website and message board (though the board is going down in October after over 7 years of operation)
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that there still are PS2's running Linux in tucked away in SCEA/SCEE offices.
Kinda like the Linksys WRT54G 'controversy'.
You could at one time buy a 54G that would happily load any of several open-source firmware options. Of course, having a Linux-based router was somethinng of a novelty then, and after twisting arms and getting linksys to actually obey the GPL, code was written and we had fun.
Then Linksys upgraded the WRT54 series, and introduced some with minimal RAM/ROM hardware. Oh my, you would think the world stopped.
Eventually, Linksys actually shipped some with the old hardware, at greater cost, and you could have fun again.
If Sony wants to reduce retail price by cheapening components and eliminating the option to load other OSes, well, their choice. Go buy a Wii. Or an xBox. Or a PC. They left you.
deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
Linux on the PS2 or PS3 has nothing to do with that tax, which was eliminated before either was released. Where are you people getting your information?
Nobody uses the PS3 for supercomputing these days. The ugly secret of the PS3 is that its 'extreme performance' was mostly marketing.
Folding@Home maintains a popular PS3 client that is currently used by 31,933 PS3s. The PS3s provide about 26% of the total x86 equivalent TFLOPS available to F@H, although PS3s represent just 9% of the total F@H CPU population.
Let me emphasize that: thirty one thousand, nine hundred thirty three PS3s actively contribute to Folding@Home. That's a long way from zero, my friend.
I actually tried installing Linux on my PS3 when I first got it. Got all the way to the configuration screen and it would not detect any of my USB keyboards. So could not complete the isntall. The bad thing is, rebooting booted back into Linux and to the setup screen. I called Sony and asked them how to get back to the PS3 OS, and they said that when I shut down Linux, there was an option to boot back into the PS3. I was like, um, yeah, but the Linux installation was not successful. They were like, oh, um, return the unit to the store and we hope you got the extended warrenty, otherwise they may not take it back.
Truthfully, no big loss. Those who I know who did successfully get Linux installed on there did it mainly for geek reasons - I cannot think of anyone who actually USED it for anything. My understanding is they crippled the hardware in Linux anyways.
Truthfully, though, you are ranting against Sony? I am not a Sony fan boy, but, truthfully, as far as gaming platforms go, there is only one even remotely in the same league, and then you will have the Microsoft bashers on you. And last I checked, you could not install Linux on it either.
This article is bs, the only reason Sony allowed the installation of other operations systems was so they could get a break on import tariffs in certain regions where game consoles are hit more than general purpose computers.
As for removing the "final reason for the open source world to care about Sony", the Linux experience on the ps3 was never good to begin with, you never got full access to the hardware, I guess this might be unfortunate for some people but it's really not all that important.
With respect to the rootkit nonsense, what does that have to do with anything in the "open source world" other than a cheap way of saying "I think Sony stinks, here is something they are doing I think is stinky, also remember that one time they did something totally unrelated that was also stinky, so obviously I'm right Q.E.D."
Sony uses open source and contributes to some open source projects, for example they use the linux kernel and some other tools on their high-end televisions and DVRs, they also contributed kernel code to get support for the cell processor.
That said, this does not mean Sony is a "friend" to open source, or an enemy for that matter, they are like many other multinational corporations. Unless there are some people high up on the company or a large number of people elsewhere in the company that have a soft spot for a particular movement or project they are generally going to behave like a short-sighted sociopath and do what they want with little consideration for how it will be seen by anyone outside their target audience for a particular product (sometimes they don't even pay much attention to that). Anthropomorphizing corporations into heroes or villains might be useful in getting people emotionally engaged, might get you a lot of hits on your blog, and might give people casually interested in the issue a little talking point they can repeat giving them a feeling as though they have some insight into the situation. But in reality it does little toward giving readers anything beyond a very superficial understanding of the issue, the parties involved, or their motivations.
Hands up all those who:
A) Have a PS3
B) Installed Linux on it
C) Used Linux on it for more than 5 minutes as a "Hey, look, this thing runs linux. Cool... Reboot."
This is a non-event, no-one buys a PS3 to install Linux on it as the cool hardware that you might want to play with isn't accessible from Linux anyway.
Specialist Mac support for creative pros, Melbourne
Let me get this straight, Sony actually bothered allowing us to install Linux on the PS3 in the first place and they're no friend to open source or hackers? Since when did the competition let you install any third party software on their machines at all? Sure, it had limitations to protect their investment, but it was an option at all. Now it seems its no longer economical to continue making the device that way but surely someone else recognizes the severely short-sighted Sony-hating required to claim that somehow the only console company to offer Linux support ever (on two of its consoles in a row no less) has some special standing as a parriah to the open source community.
- Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
And nothing of value was lost.
IMO Sony *never* supported the Open Source community with either the PS2 or PS3 to benefit the community... I would say that Sony was using the Open Source community to attempt to give themselves financial gain (50 million Euros to be exact).
;-))
Why sould I say such things? Well... up until late June 2006, Sony was fighting a legal battle with the EU to get a customs rebate (worth 50 million Euros) on its PS2's since Sony claimed that they were "computers" not "video game consoles" and I would suppose that the ability to install a third party OS was a major part of their argument. The distinction was important because up until 2004, the EU didn't have any import duties on computers, but did on game consoles... So I would surmise that if Sony did not include the same "computer" capability on their PS3 to install a third part OS, it would weaken their claim that the PS2 was a computer. Since the verdict was handed down so close to the PS3 release date, IMHO Sony probably decided to leave the third party OS support in anyways just in case they could appeal the decision.
Fast forward to 2009, when no appeals are possible in the PS2 customs case, Sony has no reason to keep the third party OS support in the PS3 and removes it when the next hardware major revision came out and a plausible "face saving" explanation for the removal is possible. (Sony still is a Japanese company, so a "face saving" explanation is important... if it were MSFT, they would have dropped the support the second that any chance of appeal was not possible.
News Article About the PS2 Customs Decision: http://www.gamedaily.com/articles/features/uk-court-ps2-not-a-computer/69084/?biz=1
People who are never going to buy a single game for those hundreds of consoles, Sony's only way of making back money on the console they sell at a loss.
Does it make you happy you're so strange?
They are so totally supressing open source, that is why they have a list of TV products containing GPL (the page containing the linux downloads for their cameras was featured some time ago on slashdot)
www.sony.com/linux
Lets note it - this is not the usual 20-levels-CMSd-put-in-by-trainee URL we see so often when it comes to barely fulfilling the GPL (usually only to avoid beeing sued) by offering the source *somewhere* on the companies HP. This is a top-level one-word-link on their domain. I am sure such a thing has to be approved pretty high up in the hierachy.
Look at it. To say it clearly: Sony openly open sourced thing long before other big players. No i am not a fanboy of Sony. As a matter of fact i made a decision not to buy their (great) P-series portable, because i did not want to spend time installing linux myself. I don't own a PS3. However i understand (other than the FP) that
a) Sony has many BIG departments, where each probably has its own interests.
b) Sony as a whole company obviously has *NO* strong anti-linux position (otherwise there would *NOT* be several departments publishing linux products).
c) The Games department has probably to worry abot things different from linux right now. Also, i personally understand that they do not want to waste time on providing the possibility to subsidize computing power. (If you buy a console you know that it is subsidized, there is no lie about that. Nobody is holding a gun against your head forcing you to buy it).
http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/common/search.html
(Would i have cheched that before, maybe i'd have bought a p-series. The "instant mode" is linux)
Oh man, what will Sony do without Open Source? /s
Seriously, when they had the time and were throwing everything but the kitchen sink into the PS3 (remember PS2 emulation?), it was feasible. The PS3 slim is "What can we cobble together for cheap that does what most people expect a PS3 to do?", and Linux just happens not to be a big sticking point for 99.99% of console gamers. If enough people cared, I'm sure they'd love to support it and take your money.
And most graphics cards today (I see one on Google Product search for $60) have S-Video.
Back in 2003, I bought a Radeon card just so I could run StepMania through S-Video, but I admit I am atypical. How many people would be inclined to buy a graphics card and pay a geek to install it rather than just buy a console? Enough to make console-style games for PC worth it?
If you look at the situation in different way, Apple did exactly the same to their own G5 users (lets forget G4-), even worse since G5 Macs are freaking Desktop computers/Workstations.
Snow Leopard _is_ possible on G5 if Apple spends considerable (even for them) amount of money, hires thousands of PowerPC developers, pay dozens of companies for code licenses... All for? Us, remaining G5 users that lots of developers are semi happy to abandon.
I hope I could express my feelings and understanding same time but let me state again. Apple, abandoned their PowerPC G5 users for the new OS. Of course, Leopard (10.5) will be supported/updated for years from now on, perhaps it could break Windows records as 10.6 is built on 10.5.
It is a game console/home entertainment device and if you look at the submitters tone, you can also guess the other reason: Lack of community feedback/thank you/positive words. Guy started with DRM, ended up with Rootkit, for God's sake...
Please change your tagline to:
News for Linux fanboys, stuff that doesn't fucking matter.
Seriously, would you get over posting every single story involving Linux as if its Earth shattering and going to change the way everyone thinks/works/lives in the next 24 fucking hours?
Heres a hint: If Linux on the PS3 was a big deal, they wouldn't have stopped it. They stopped it because all 4 people who give a fuck aren't enough to justify paying people to deal with it. You kooks have no sense of reality or cost of doing business.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
By "most of the computing power", you must mean the RSX video chip. But the Cell CPU is fully accessible under Linux. And at 200GFLOPS, that's way more power than an x86 (or any other) PC has to offer. All under Linux, as several "cheap supercomputer" projects demonstrated.
--
make install -not war
http://wiibrew.org/wiki/Wii_Linux
Not sure about the 360, though.
First, to the story poster, the Sony that made the rootkit isn't the same Sony that makes the PS3. Sony Music made the rootkit, and Sony Computer Entertainment makes the PS3. Yes, same parent company, but two very different divisions. Also, SCE doesn't make Sony computers. Just because the name Sony is common doesn't mean it's the same division, or even the same company. Each division can have vastly different philosophies. So comparing SCE to Sony Music or Sony Computers (whatever the exact company names are) makes for a flawed argument.
Anyway, to me, this story and a number of replies to it smack of open source elitism. You know that's why Windows and Mac users don't much care for us Linux users, right? Open source isn't the be all end all solution to everything. Yeah, I use Kubuntu Linux (Jaunty, to be exact), and I have since December 2006. I'm quite happy with Linux. But I know that open source can't do every single thing perfectly. I use the closed source NVIDIA graphics driver, because the open source version isn't up to par. I use Adobe Flash Player, because Gnash can't hold a candle to the official product (not yet at least; I tried Gnash on Homestarrunner.com and Weebl's Stuff, and the video was much slower than the audio, causing a huge syncing issue). At one point I used the Adobe Acrobat Reader, because the KDE PDF viewers at the time couldn't support editing PDF forms and emailing the results (functionality of a more recent version of Acrobat).
Sony removing Linux support from the PS3 Slim isn't the end of the world. You can still install Linux on the pre-Slim units. My 60 Gig PS3 (now with a new 120 Gig HD) still has the Install Other OS option. I don't use it, because it would be redundant, seeing as how my computer and PS3 are in the same room. But I still have the option. It isn't like the feature is being removed from every PS3 in existence. Besides, I don't understand why someone needs Linux on their PS3 and their PC at the same time. Sure, I can understand the curiosity factor. But I don't see what other functionality you need that the PS3 doesn't have to begin with, or that you can't easily get on your PC.
There are ongoing rumours that the PS3 is especially difficult to develop software on since the architecture is complicated and different. Developing games are said to be extremely costly because of that and I've seen users complaining that for example the Orange box is a lot buggier on the PS3 than on the Xbox360.
If that's the case Sony should do everything they can to encourage software development on their consoles and provide tools for people so that they learn how to fully implement the hardware.
When I was a kid, the SONY meant that the product was more expensive but also significantly superior from most competitors. Now, when I purchase a product, the price differential is to pay for four things - the letters S-O-N-Y. That's all the brand means today. You're getting what you pay for - no more, no less.
*** Don't be dull.***
Yes, of course, Apple copied the idea of selling software in an online store from the Xbox
It's not that as much as the $99 fee for the iPhone developer certificate resembles the $99 fee for XNA Creators Club.
Even though almost every XP driver worked for 2000, the installer for said drivers blocked the installation with the message "Your operating system is not supported". Hence my irritation.
No genius, it's not a sound business decision. 1) It affected more than a few people, as a lot of people were still partial to Windows 2000 at the time. 2) It wasn't a business decision at all really, because as the guy below you stated, almost all Windows XP drivers worked on Windows 2000. They just deliberately blocked them from running on Windows 2000. The drivers already worked, but were blocked because you weren't running the OS THEY wanted you to run.
The GP: "You can get away with single precision SOMETIMES in scientific computing, but more often than not it's a deal breaker."
Me: "PS3s provide about 26% of the total x86 equivalent TFLOPS available to F@H, although PS3s represent just 9% of the total F@H CPU population."
You: "It's cloud computing or trivially parallel computing."
Irrelevant; this is a subset of supercomputing for which the PS3 is sufficiently well adapted - contrary to the GPs ill-informed rant.