Slashdot Mirror
Using Outlook From Orbit
Pigskin-Referee writes with this excerpt from Office Watch: "On the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station they use Microsoft Outlook 2003, but not quite in the same way that us earthbound Earthlings do. The space shuttle Atlantis is orbiting the earth right now and the crew exchange emails with the ground a few times each day. Bandwidth is a constraint and you don't want the busy crewmembers bothered with spam or unnecessary messages so NASA has a special system in place. The crew use fairly standard laptops running Microsoft Outlook (currently Outlook 2003) with Exchange Server as the email host, but they don't link to the server using any of the standard methods."
Pah! In soviet spacestation we constrain bandwidth!
This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
They are using Outlook/Exchange like a BBS that sends in digest mode only.
No one cares. Honestly.
Oh Man Oh Man Oh Man, You're still using the command line? You gotta, I say you just gotta teach me that Arcane forgotten art!
Who needs a GUI when you've got the command line!
In space, no one can hear you scream at Microsoft Outlook...
Why not just run a normal mailserver with a simple script to deliver any messages in the files uploaded? No need for the astronauts to mess with weird outlook files, just hit "check mail" on whatever client they prefer.
For all those years i wanted to shoot outlook into outer space, and they already did...
...not quite realtime or important?
Yeah, I wonder what kind of IM they are using, if any (I know there were some sessions with Packet Radio and its "IM" functionality, though I'm not sure if that counts)
PS. Thinkpads aren't ordinary laptops! ;)
One that hath name thou can not otter
Is it actually cheaper to upload all the e-mails in a burst instead of using a webmail system where only the mail the receiver wants to receive would be opened? Wouldn't work if they want to read offline I guess but the concern mentioned is bandwidth not connectivity.
Any mail experts comment?
Just knowing Windows is running in space kind of gives me the willies.
It's too bad the article didn't address the architecture behind all this. I would be curious to hear what kind of network they use, and what sort of relays (satellite?). If it is satellites, why is the bandwidth so low? (Hmmm... maybe they really should have made that ethernet cable just a little longer after all...)
"Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
Albert Einstein
mail server on the ground, mail server on the shuttle.
The mail queues up and you open up the connection between them certain times of day. Queue empties.
GZIP the link and your gold.
I am a Martian prince from the Splugorthian region of the Xylerom. I have inherited a bountiful estate worth 1.8345E8 drow'xlian that I must hide from the ruthless Prxyzzilic crime family. I am willing to share 20% of my fortune with you will allow me to deposit fund in your account. Please send me your account information if you wish to do business. Live long and prosper! Prince Ryzzriwz
I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
UUCP worked quite nicely in the days when links were ephemeral, slow, or generally unreliable. This seems like a lot of effort to solve a problem that existed 30 years ago, solved, and even adapted for RFC821 and its successors. There's a reason that Sendmail knows how to rewrite addresses!
-Scott Hutton
...to use Microsoft software.
Because there’s limited bandwidth up to the shuttle it’s important to keep the OST fairly small so occasionally you’ll hear NASA controllers ask the crew to clean out their Outlook files
They ask them, over a realtime voice connection, to clean out their Outlook files to save bandwidth. That's like sending "You've got mail" as a WAV file after transmitting a 1kB mail file.
So, once a day they bundle a bunch of emails into a single .OST file and upload it to the shuttle. The astronauts then open that .OST file in their local copy of Outlook. And they have to shut down Outlook while the upload is in progress because of Outlook file locking.
If a 'Loss of Signal' can interrupt a POP session, wouldn't it also interrupt a file upload? Couldn't they just POP into the server on Earth once a day to grab their emails to be stored in a simple mbox or some such? Wouldn't this also eliminate the file locking issue as mboxes and Maildirs are pretty old and stable solutions that don't have this problem? This just sounds like someone wanted to use Microsoft Outlook no matter what and hacked together a procedure to use it even though there are way better approaches. And isn't the whole point of Outlook that it has a built in calendar and meeting request system and network folders? They're not even using those more advanced parts of it, they just need email.
We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
Do they have something to automatically change that every 30 seconds?
They have to be very careful in a close environment such as the shuttle or the space station to keep the air healthy. Using mailx like you do would give off too much smug for their filters and cleaners to handle.
You waster!
I only transmit messages via telepathy!
You didn't really think about the security issues, did you? How do you know if some unauthorized third person listens tro your telepathy stream?
Don't tell me you're able to do real-time RSA encryption in your head!
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
'The crew use fairly standard laptops running Microsoft Outlook (currently Outlook 2003) with Exchange Server as the email host...Because there's limited bandwidth up to the shuttle it's important to keep the OST fairly small so occasionally you'll hear NASA controllers ask the crew to clean out their Outlook files'
I say we take off and re-install the entire OS from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
CB radio?
As there is a new President in the Office and he doesn't really like (it seems) fantasy and unrealistic plans, he should also order his IT guys to start an investigation why standard, documented protocols like IMAP, XMPP aren't used. A visit from a Internet2 academic could be enough...
In fact, it is an International issue. ISS doesn't "belong" to USA, there are several billions of dollars of other countries out there.
While on it, they should also ask NASA about why on Earth "NASA TV is best viewed fullscreen with Windows Media Player", why there isn't a standard MP4 based live broadcast, why it defaults to Windows Media regardless of your setup...
Something really happening over there, trust me on that... These are the guys who had a genius idea of using Kermit as a protocol for communication before these "Outlook", "Windows Media Player" guys took over the job.
If there are people thinking "Oh but MS is an American company", let me remind, Red Hat, Sun Micro, IBM and lots of standards bodies are American too... That is in case the multi hundred billion dollar project should be a billboard for pathetic software setups.
Direct TV's satellites are geosynchronous the space station is not- so I would think it is feasible in part of the orbit where there is line of sight- Otherwise, just upgrade the worldwide systems that already talk to the station for a thicker connection.
Don't tell me you're able to do real-time RSA encryption in your head!
DjEU3D*c.A893DK56GIXCmxk35DQd9Am5F(2FGvn.S1@d(Ak3DFmCx*(FkdAi3AKCqA83JMDwq
I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
If only that headline used "Nuking" instead of "Using" Outlook from Orbit.
My company recently switched from a really screwball lotus notes install to msexchange and thereby screwed every unix and mac user -- which is to say, 95% of the technical staff. Some of that I can't blame MSFT for, we do have some real chimpanzees on our email team, but the experience does have me shaking my fist in Redmond's direction even more than usual of late.
News for Geeks in Austin, TX
Thats the beauty of telepathy! You only have to think about security to use it.
I noticed you pushed a button on your console. Are you trying to steer your spacecraft? Please wait whilst Clippy ShuttleBuddy extensions for .NET 3.0 SP6 is installed, then after a reboot we'll get right on with that.
"...but they don't link to the server using any of the standard methods."
I bet they link to the server using WIFI...
Privacy is terrorism.
Windows exists above the cloud!
In fact, you should be surprised that Windows is _STILL_ running after a Virus has hit the ISS orbiting the planet.
No kidding, Google it.
It is particularly sad that NASA IT guys aren't obviously that pathetic to license Outlook from MS. Something really going on there, a lot of open source software/operating systems has NASA contributed excellent code in them.
PS: I remember they also had Norton Utilities with "rescue diskettes" back in 1990s, it leaked while I was trying to find a way to manually uninstall norton...
Except the shuttle isn't in a geosynchronous orbit, like the DirecTV satellite. Try redirecting your dish to something that's moving at over 17,000 mph.
You and your command lines, I receive my email as boxes of punched cards!
You may jest, but you can do a lot more, more easily, from a command line than a GUI on any platform. Even Windows. Try to
ren antique???.jpg desk???.jpg
in File Manager (or whatever they call it these days). If you have 500 pictures of antique desks named antique001, antique001, etc it would take forever to rename them desk001, desk002, etc in a GUI.
Free Martian Whores!
Doesn't the use of Microsoft products in space violate article 3 section 47 paragraph 3 of the Shadow Proclamation?
I was doing this 20 years ago with UUCP and/or sendmail.
HELO mx1.ground.nasa.gov
EXTN
QUIT
Push queued mail on demand to the orbiting mail server. Cron up the EXTN trigger or setup sendmail (which its happy to do) to handle the queuing whever you want.
Guess what, it works with exchange too!
I guess NASA spends its money on aeronautical engineers and not computer system admins. I'd be willing to bet that I could do it cheaper and more reliably even with exchange than there method, in their constraints of bandwidth and available connection time.
Seriously, I ran a FIDOnet hub, its not hard. :)
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
From: Oleg Kotov
To: CC Ops Ground Control
Subject: Check out what the toothpaste does in zero-G!
Location: COLBERT Room
Start Time: 2009-01-13 1745
End Time: 2009-01-13 1800
[Accept] [Decline] [Decline with comment] [Delegate]
In other words, it's a really shitty reimplementation of UUCP mail transiting.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
It would be insightful if it were talking about something else.
Using the command line to read email is hardly a 'good' way to go about it.
It works and is usable for some, but even most shell users use 'a gui' like Pine or the like.
Its cute that you think you're bad ass cause you and the parent suggested the command line, but it just shows you're trying too hard to be something you aren't.
There are times to use the command line, and times when it is more efficient. Reading your daily email isn't one of those times, regardless of how cool you think it makes you to do so.
You aren't old school, you're just dumb and inefficient.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
A couple problems...
1) Due to the fact that the ISS orbits Earth very quickly, with an orbital period of 91 minutes, you'd barely get your receiver up and running and locked onto the signal before it disappeared again. DirecTV doesn't work on the opposite side of the planet to the USA, and the planet definitely makes a better door than a window in this case.
2) TV birds are generally spot beamed. Yes the ISS orbits much closer to Earth than satellites in geostationary orbit, but regardless, if you're outside of the spot beam, you might not get much of a signal. Also, as in my first point, the planet tends to get in the way.
3) The astronauts presumably have much more important things to do, like trying not to screw up and kill everyone on board, science experiments, station maintenance/building, etc, than to goof around with some stupid satellite TV service.
Oh Man Oh Man Oh Man, You're still using the command line? You gotta, I say you just gotta teach me that Arcane forgotten art!
Who needs a GUI when you've got the command line!
This is just like how someone was telling me it was 2009 and wondering why I was still using vim. And he was telling me this on an IRC channel. Pot, meet kettle.
Porn of antique desks? Whatever floats your boat I guess.
whoa, pine has a ui not a gui (graphical user interface).
the way most geeks talk, the things that the curses library can do come under the phrase "command line", like the text w3m or lynx interface
Whys that? Because the terminal window on your monitor takes less energy to display? Nope, thats not true without using an LED display (not LED backlight, the entire thing has to be LED or it doesn't make a difference).
You think that just displaying a GUI consumes energy? Please provide a citation. Any GUI on a modern OS doesn't require any processing power for displaying something on the screen that is static. You update the screen to current and it sits there.
Outlook isn't constantly drawing the entire display for each frame of your monitors refresh, the video card is, and it works the exact same way regardless of using the command line or a gui app, especially since you probably would end up using a terminal client on a system running in GUI mode and not traditional text console mode anyway.
Then couple in the additional wasted time from the incredibly niave and out of touch with reality since you have the idea that YOUR mail client is some how more efficient than theres.
Its cute that you have tunnel vision and are a retarded fanboy rather than having any sort of logical thought on the issue.
Good job, you've once again reassured my previous experiences that contrary to popular belief, MIT produces nothing but ignorant douche bags who think they know a lot more than they actually do.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
Honestly, it sounds like a pretty fun grad level dynamics problem. The orbital mechanics to track an object in orbit from the ground are calculated all the time, tracking an object in geostationary orbit from an orbiting object, i'm not sure if that has been done before- probably but not sure. Just because it is moving "fast" doesn't mean is isn't doable.
parent post++
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
You may jest, but you can do a lot more, more easily, from a command line than a GUI on any platform. Even Windows. Try to
ren antique???.jpg desk???.jpg
in File Manager
In Windows: CTRL+A, F2, "desk", ENTER.
Admittedly that gives you names like "desk (01).jpg" and not "desk01.jpg" but it's close enough. If you want a significantly higher level of control, try something like Flexible Renamer (somewhat prone to crashing, but the most versatile and powerful I've found).
"What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
/)
ren antique???.jpg desk???.jpg
mmv "antique*.jpg" "desk#1.jpg"
Owning an in dash car mp3 player since roughly the millenium, which only really understands 8.3 filenames, I've gotten pretty handy at renaming downloaded audiobook mp3 files ...
"Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
In Soviet space station, bandwith constrains YOU!
(was that the first "in soviet russia" joke that was actually factally correct?)
Free Martian Whores!
LOL... you should try smoke signals :)
Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that
OK, so mailx(1) isn't the perfect mail client (didn't support MIME, last time I checked). But Nasa using Outlook, a sucky client tied with a proprietary interface to MS Exchange -- what's up with that?
These OST files are tiny by ground-based standards – around at most 4MB for shuttle crew.
Amazing. A just over a half-dozen people and yet they manage to keep their email communications down to just 2,000 pages of text a day! How do they manage.
The OST file, now with outgoing emails, is copied back to NASA on the ground where the messages are sent, copied to the Sent Items folder and any new email is placed in the OST ready for the next upload.
Well, that makes sense. They reply with the same type of file that they receive with. If it's good for bandwidth one way, it's good for bandwidth the other I'd guess.
Because there’s limited bandwidth up to the shuttle it’s important to keep the OST fairly small so occasionally you’ll hear NASA controllers ask the crew to clean out their Outlook files (the OST).
Whajah? They're sending the *entire* mailbox both ways and just bouncing the same messages back and forth every time? How does that save bandwidth? How do these guys send pictures to each other, zip up an image of the entire hard drive?
I guess that explains why they need to transfer 2,000+ pages of text every day.
This sounds cumbersome and messy
True. Because it is cumbersome and messy.
it’s certainly not the way you’d do it here on the Green Hills of Earth.
It's also not the way I'd do it in space either, because of the bandwidth constraints.
However it makes sense
No it doesn't. Not under any circumstance does "send the whole thing back and forth every time" make sense if the thing you're trying to conserve is bandwidth.
You might also hear ‘CapCom’ asking the crew to shut down their copies of Outlook so that an OST transfer can occur. Outlook puts a file lock on any PST/OST file which prevents any copying (a problem anyone trying to do an Outlook backup might be familiar with).
Ahh, so that's it. They're not trying to conserve bandwidth. They're trying to conserve "thinking about it." Otherwise, they'd only have to shut down outlook when renaming "file.ost.xfer" to "c:\...\outlookdir\file.ost"
In addition, communication with the ground isn’t always possible (you’ll hear warnings of LOS – Loss of Signal during mission communications) so standard methods of email transfer like POP/SMTP, IMAP etc might not be reliable.
True. Why does it need to be email, though. Why can't they just send a psk-31 HF radiogram? or the even more fault tolerant HF packet radio? You only need a transmit station somewhere in the same hemisphere for that to work.
Hell, with a directional antenna (and a doppler-compensating transmitter), there's no reason why they couldn't use 3G cell service when over a country which has it. 300 miles up gets you a window of up to 11 minutes which would let you download quite a bit.
But I don't think bandwidth is really the issue. There's enough bandwidth to transmit live video for pete's sake, but email is somehow a problem? The issue is that "outlook is email." It clearly has simply never occurred to anyone in the chain that there might even be any other way to handle email-type communications.
Can you be Even More Awesome?!
I use a 2400 modem to call google voice and record the e-mail. Then my computer uses dragon to transcribe them back to digital, then print. I use fed-ex (Hey, not too many donkeys around anymore ya know?) to send them to my mail box. I retreive them from the mailbox by walking up hill in the snow both ways! (but replies go back to the mail box on a belt system).
BEAT THAT!
**note above challenge was tongue in cheek, nothing was real, and if you so much as are reading this post today, you've already won.**
How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
When skimming my RSS feed, I'd have sworn the headline had said, "Nuking Outlook From Orbit". Maybe my subconscious was imagining a one-upsmanship over "Will it Blend" to "Will it Nuke".
I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
Wasn't that what Larry Wall was doing at the JPL when he invented Perl?
Glad to hear they have an Exchange server running the heavy load of emails. I imagine they really need it to schedule all those meetings on their calendars with each other. We all know have disconnected people can get when they never see each other face to face while working on the Space Shuttle. You constantly got people on either the upper or lower level, but you can never find them when you want them.
jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
I think I might have something slightly better and slightly better GUI.
the web site is http://www.1-4a.com/
he's got file renamer version 1.56
I've done 6000 file renames, as a batch, without issue every week for 6 month or so. not 1 error yet.
hope it helps
if you see me, smile and say hello.
IMs - Email for those who don't realize nothing they do is so important that someone else has to know/answer RIGHT NOW!@%!@%!@%!@%@#^@#^!
I'm sure you could find being more wrong very hard.
IM is, on the one hand, quite instant in delivery, like voice. But, and here's where you are phenomenally wrong, it doesn't need immediate attention. It will be there when you feel like answering. Or not answering - because it's for things that aren't so important or so complex as the ones discussed in e-mails. Just one quick short message.
Luckily I'm dealing with intelligent people who mostly communicate with me via IM/sms, because they know that a) voice communication is only for extremely urgent or important things (and as usual method of communication for very few of people close to me) or b) know that mail is mostly for important ones.
Anyway, the main reason I'm asking is that one ubershitty IM network from my place ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadu-Gadu ) claims they were the first in space / on the ISS. While that is doubtful in itself (whether Roscosmos or NASA would allow this kind of software, whether it would connect), finding direct earlier example would be useful (and other than text communication via pocket radio)
One that hath name thou can not otter
excuse me, but there was no need to swear when you thought that.
if you see me, smile and say hello.
There has, unfortunately, been a recorded instance of someone believing that they(ie. themselves directly, not their computer) receive email.
Very odd.
MOD PARENT UP
Some GUI's include that sort of capability too.
What is this "e" mail you speak of? I get my mail in envelopes...
Specialist Mac support for creative pros, Melbourne
vim? Man I still use the original vi, get off my lawn you young whipper snappers.
aww man I totally would have if he wouldn't have TURNED INTO A DICKBAG AT THE END
Where most here see only sheer stupidity, what this really is is an astute solution to a very real problem: tight-ass goverments who have no dime to spare for research!
Punch cards? Damn kids these days! I read my email in binary!
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
Who needs a GUI when you've got the command line!
Me?
I'm sorry, but when something breaks, I fall back to my working computer (with a GUI) with access to Google. :P
You, sir, have obviously never heard of nmh, or its predecessor MH. It's a suite of command line tools for email, and in 20 years of reading email, I've found nothing that yet comes close to the power and capabilities of reading and processing email with nmh. Being able to search for email from multiple folders using regexp and shell scripting just isn't as easy as on any GUI MUA I've ever seen, and because it is just a bunch of single-task binaries, it's very easy to build a GUI or even web-based front-end for it. The only thing that got me to switch from using it as my primary email was the gmail interface, and labels vs. folders. If not for that, i'd still be using it daily, and not cuz of the cool/smug factor, but simply because it works, and works well.
The net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. -- John Gilmore
how can I fix it?
Take a trip to brokeback mountain.
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
EBCDIC or 7bit ASCII?
I select all, right click, and select rename-it from my context menu.
The benefit is I get a live preview of my renaming, if I am doing something fancy.
Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
Twitter?
http://ihatehate.wordpress.com
You mean CTRL+A, right-click, rename, (type filename), enter takes forever?
Glad you believe that works in your world, now, in the Real World, it does not work.
In the Real World, you must rename each file one at a time.
For the record, you can substitute F2 for "right click, rename". Works much faster AND does not require using the mouse!
need another system administrator. Cuz the ones they have suck...stupidest solution ever.
I'm sorry, but when something breaks, I fall back to my working computer (with a GUI) with access to Google. :P
In my experience it's more often the GUI that breaks. 9 times out of 10 you still have the command line available in a failure scenario, and some of us are too busy/lazy to get to another machine with working GUI, so it really is beneficial to know how to get things done on the command line. Of course, you need a system that actually makes it possible to get things done from the command line interface (thank you Unix family!). Google is still reachable from the CLI :P
-IOVAR Web Dev Platform
Lets see they were using tech from 1948 in 1969 so that means.....yup 1978 sounds about right. Pretty soon they are going to put a microwave in the shuttle too. {insert microwave space joke here}
Using a text-based interface isn't an efficient way of reading text? You're going to have to go a bit further to explain that position.
What are you, 12? Grow up, for fuck sakes.
I don't care why you're posting AC
You got that backwards, actually - Outlook isn't tied to Exchange, Exchange is tied to Outlook.
My sig can beat up your sig.
I read that as "busy crewmembers bothered with spam or unnecessary messages from NASA"
Instead of flaky Outlook/Exchange setups, they should use technology designed for low bandwidth and intermittent connections, like uucp.
Actually the command is ETRN.
Back in the mid-90's, we used to use this with our ISDN customers who wanted to have their own email domains, but didn't want to pay for always-on ISDN. So we set up mail servers for them that would bring up the ISDN link, issue an ETRN command to our mail server, wait while the mail got sent, then shut the link back down. Worked great.
From TFA: It’s surprising that Microsoft hasn’t made more noise about the use of Microsoft Office in space
Microsoft probably isn't making more noise about this because it is a TERRIBLE system.
or... just because it's not the worst, it doesn't make it the best. /. page !
My god - now NASA controls the fortunes at the foot of the
Nullius in verba
It's called a TUI.
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
1. You received the mail with my family pictures. I need the one that has a picture of my house in it. Find it and send it back to me.
2. You receive a ton of new albums in mp3 format, but since your mp3 player is short on space, you need to weed out the "interludes", which are each less than 1 megabyte. Save the songs, but delete the interludes.
3. Take a link from the email, go to that website, and post the albums and pictures to the "cloud" for backup.
Just a few things I'd think would really suck to do with a command line interface.
Google is still reachable from the CLI
But are the web sites linked to by Google readable using lynx/links2/w3c?
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
Python/Perl/Ruby would (probably) make your job easier.
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
Noob! I hold the ethernet cable on my tongue and decipher the signal with my nerves.
Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
In a word 'no'. PST i don't think he gets it :P
vi? I use a magnet to physically rearrange the bits on my hard drive
Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
...where NASA blows it's financing. On Microsoft "can't bother to fix it" software. How trite. Instead of using free software, free OS's - developed for the scientifically minded, they're using brainless, costly, ineffective software products coupled with brainless, costly, ineffective operating systems. WAY TO GO NASA! Now it's clear why other "space related" groups are moving ahead in the game. Now the old joke makes sense, in a big way. "In the 60's, the US government and NASA spent millions of dollars to research and develop an ink pen that would function in a weightless environment. Meanwhile, the Russians used a pencil."
YankDownUnder Veni, Vidi, volo in domum redire
Excuse me, but REAL programmers use Butterflies. We open their hands and let their delicate wings flap once. The disturbance ripples outward, changing the flow of the eddy currents in the upper atmosphere. These cause momentary pockets of higher-pressure air to form, which act as lenses deflecting incoming cosmic rays, focusing them to strike the drive platter and flip the desired bit.
Thanks for the suggestion, but looking at the page for that program it doesn't appear to support regular expressions. The biggest reason I usually use Flexible Renamer is it's ubiquitous support for regular expression (source files/directories, destination files/directories, grouping/matching, etc).
"What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
/)
Because the terminal window on your monitor takes less energy to display? Nope, thats not true without using an LED display (not LED backlight, the entire thing has to be LED or it doesn't make a difference).
I've always wondered if a black background uses less energy on an LCD monitor than white.
Not that it would make much difference in my case, since all of my urxvt windows are bg white.
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
This story looks like a Microsoft troll. The link to the story http://news.office-watch.com/t/n.aspx?articleid=1329&zoneid=12 does not provide any link to NASA as a source. Without a source we must suspect a hoax. Sending a 4MB OST file to space back and forth sounds incredible, bandwidth wasteful, as information as text would be very large at 4KB per transmission. 4MB could be 2000 pages of text.! I have exchanged emails from the middle of the Atlantic Ocean on a yacht using SSB radio and a Pactor modem http://www.scs-ptc.com/shop/categories/modems-en at 2400bps. Why, because bandwidth over a HF radio link is limited. There are many lightweight email clients and command line equivalent email clients that can communicate without the noise associated with animated smileys and gifs. The message is important, straight ASCII, tells it all. The medium here is not the message.
I often look nostalgically back and think of the old bang paths for e-mail. Boy, I don't miss 'em! :)
Mod parent up. Why do GUI's suck for a seasoned admin? Because we can do things in a shell that aren't possible using the GUI. And we can automate them.
My iPod Touch probably gets a hell of a lot more email than 4MB per day and deals with tricky issues such as Loss Of Signal. Talk about a solution looking for a problem.
TCP over meteorites?
I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
that word is a recently invented retronym, newer than the term GUI. another term used is CUI, console user interface. be fun to see which term is older.
recently invented retronym
For what value of "recent"? 10 years, at least.
CUI, console user interface.
I'm trying to remember what we called the TurboPascal interface, when comparing it to GUIs like the early Macs.
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
Thats why I stare to an A-Team poster whenever I'm doing my telepathy.
Options for accessing this content:
//srcsm
You can purchase online access to this article for a 24-hour period. </quote>
O rly? 24 hrs? such a bargain!!
Care to link to somewhere else where we all kind of read the content? like, the 99% of the Internet?
It's been like 1 year since I can't use html tags, just saying.
We've all learned about the OSI model.
It seems like these guys are going through great lengths to hack the application layer, when this is really the fault of the transmission layer.
Why not come up with a better protocol than TCP/IP or the radio protocol or whatever the heck it is that they're using, and then tune the OS to work off that stack and hand it over to Outlook as standard network data?
-David
I've always wondered if a black background uses less energy on an LCD monitor than white.
If anything it would use a tiny bit more because the LCD default state is clear, with energy being required to turn it black. (This is why a digital watch shows no numbers if the battery is dead.) But the difference in power would be extremely minuscule.
Odd. It just pops right up for me, and I'm not in a university IP block or anything, just basic residential DSL.
Anyway, article is called "Delusional experience of self as receiver of email in schizoaffective disorder" google might have something that works for you.
You think that just displaying a GUI consumes energy? Please provide a citation. Any GUI on a modern OS doesn't require any processing power for displaying something on the screen that is static.
Displaying GUI itself is several thousands, if not millions of lines of code. Same goes for any "modern OS".
Command line driven email client can be implemented on a low-power 1KHz PIC microcontroller that takes a few microamperes of energy to operate. Static LCD display, built-in RS232 at 9600 for communication, and you have a device that takes under 1 milliampere at 5V, that is 0.005 watts to operate (when not in sleep mode where it takes 1% of that.)
I'm not saying it's practical or reasonable, but if your point is minimizing energy requirements, there is a point where GUI has to go.
45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
depends how it is done.
Some LCD displays (in calculators) have polaroid filters separate, not embedded in the glass. Rotate it 90 degrees and you have white digits on black background. No electric change whatsoever.
LCD pixel switched on (crystal ordered, color) uses minimal amounts of energy vs pixel switched off (unordered, transparent) using no energy at all. Thus in backlit displays white uses less energy than black (transparent, no obscuring of backlight) while in reflective displays, black uses more energy... unless the polaroid is reversed in which case white does...
45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
I use 5 bit Baudot code on punched tape. RYRYRYRYRY....
Hey! Thanks for the info, that's the desktop I use at home! I haven't looked at documentation in years, maybe I should start.
Free Martian Whores!
If the objective is to save bandwidth...whatever happened to pine/elm/mutt/emacs ?! :D
In Soviet NASA, Outlook nukes YOU from orbit.
GUI is over 25 years old, word TUI isn't otherwise I would have known about it (I've been doing this shit since early 70s)
TUI isn't otherwise I would have known about it (I've been doing this shit since early 70s)
I've "only" been doing it (academically and professionally) for 25 years.
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1