Slashdot Mirror


Using Classical Music As a Form of Social Control

cyberfringe writes "Classical music is being used increasingly in Great Britain as a tool for social control and a deterrent to bad behavior. One school district subjects badly behaving children to hours of Mozart in special detention. Unsurprisingly, some of these youth now find classical music unbearable. Recorded classical music is blared through speakers at bus stops, outside stores, train stations and elsewhere to drive away loitering youth. Apparently it works. Detentions are down, graffiti is reduced, and naughty youth flee because they find classical music repugnant."

721 comments

  1. A Clockwork Orange by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are aware that A Clockwork Orange was fiction, aren't you? It was a movie and not a documentary.

    --
    John
    1. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Kuroji · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And that's exactly what it's going to do -- the youth of Britain will identify ALL classical music as repugnant based on its use and the majority will want nothing to do with it. Indeed, they will want to see it burned.

      Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

    2. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're probably repelling people by playing it really loudly and with horrible quality. Classical music has a lot of high notes and when played poorly it's a lot like listening to nails on a chalkboard.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chavs yes, the rest of the youth not so much.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    4. Re:A Clockwork Orange by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      droogs, don't filly with the ludwig van.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    5. Re:A Clockwork Orange by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

      I suggest Rage Against The Machine.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    6. Re:A Clockwork Orange by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could use Crumb's "Black Angels" which was supposed to be played at volumes "on the threshold of pain". (I have listened to it loud but haven't pushed my speakers -- or my hearing -- quite that far.)

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    7. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first time I heard this, it was fairly loud, and the screeching violins startled the hell out of me. That whole piece in general gives me the chills.

    8. Re:A Clockwork Orange by dcollins · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music..."

      Case study: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,672177,00.html

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    9. Re:A Clockwork Orange by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes!

      But with the voice redubbed in as Donald Duck.

    10. Re:A Clockwork Orange by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are aware that A Clockwork Orange was fiction, aren't you? It was a movie and not a documentary.

      Don't forget that Alex DeLarge actually liked Ludwig Von. He was appalled by what was done in order to let people dislike his music.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    11. Re:A Clockwork Orange by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      "FUCK YOU! I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME! ...MOTHERFUCKER!"

      (The rest of this comment is just filler text so that I can get the above quote past Slashdot's caps-lock filter. Yes, it is supposed to be all-caps. Yes, it's like yelling. It is supposed to be like yelling.)

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    12. Re:A Clockwork Orange by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is a human melody played on the flesh of the incompetent. Those too feeble to know good from evil, right from wrong. Graphitist and rapists alongside murderers and thieves. I shall enjoy you trogs being ground to dust. Defilers of space and wisdom that you are.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    13. Re:A Clockwork Orange by halowolf · · Score: 1

      Please, no more Britney.

    14. Re:A Clockwork Orange by MrMista_B · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So, deliberate torture, then.

      Fuck Britain.

    15. Re:A Clockwork Orange by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      This thread gives me a nice warm vibraty feeling all through me gutty-whats

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    16. Re:A Clockwork Orange by mim · · Score: 1

      And that's exactly what it's going to do -- the youth of Britain will identify ALL classical music as repugnant based on its use and the majority will want nothing to do with it. Indeed, they will want to see it burned.

      or not..."It had been a wonderful evening and what I needed now, to give it the perfect ending, was a little of the Ludwig Von."

    17. Re:A Clockwork Orange by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      My first thought. What I came here to read. Thank you.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    18. Re:A Clockwork Orange by justin12345 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They should switch to country western. No loss there.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    19. Re:A Clockwork Orange by mpe · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're probably repelling people by playing it really loudly and with horrible quality.

      Rather indicated by use of the term "blared". It's probably only a question of time before before such speakers start attracting the same kind of destruction as speed cameras.

    20. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the kids will like that.. well most of them anyway.. I suppose rage is old people music now.

    21. Re:A Clockwork Orange by MadKeithV · · Score: 2

      Or as we covered it way back when at a school concert for the benefit of the teachers:
      "If it wouldn't displease you too much I'd rather not follow your instructions, please."

      The kids got it, and the teachers didn't have a clue.

    22. Re:A Clockwork Orange by umghhh · · Score: 2, Informative
      this has already happened - from TFA:

      "They seem to loathe [the music]," said the proud railway guy. "It's pretty uncool to be seen hanging around somewhere when Mozart is playing."

      . It is a shame of course but there are some other things officialdom in UK (and I would believe not only there) does to people: blasting with high energy light or using high pitched noise apparently to drive all under 20 (this including toddlers) away. I am not sure if I should believe this article but nothing is impossible these days and technology offers 'solutions' to problems that only twisted mind of a public servant or perverted sadist would consider acceptable.

      I have another idea (not mine actually) why don't we equalize everybody to t he level of a moron that deploys such things?

    23. Re:A Clockwork Orange by ancient_kings · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate the republican party too...

    24. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Jurily · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'm from Hungary. Fuck Britain.

    25. Re:A Clockwork Orange by aevan · · Score: 2

      ...I just searched to see if someone had that up. Angry Donald would soooo work that song :D

    26. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Kuroji · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm from the United States and MI6 has done worse. And our police and shops don't use classical music, flashing lights, or anything else to drive kids away.

      Fuck Britain.

    27. Re:A Clockwork Orange by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      i hope your not from the united states of water boarding

      I dunno where that is, but I'm picturing clear skies, warm beaches, palm trees, and some bitchin' waves. Got a travel brochure?

    28. Re:A Clockwork Orange by xenn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do they water board at the bus stop in the USA?

    29. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep, the British took the gloves off when it came to The Troubles. That doesn't excuse Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, or extreme rendition. Although not too many countries have their hands completely clean on this score if you go back far enough in the last century. Algeria and Viet Nam for France. Any state that went through a totalitarian fascist or communist phase. And that's for the relatively modern and supposedly enlightened states.

      As a Canadian, I'm not too happy about our recent prisoner fubar in Afghanistan. especially since it seems that it wasn't just a screwup like in Somalia (where the wrong type of troops were assigned to the wrong type of duty), but that instead the politicians and upper echelons appear to have known about it for a long time and both deliberately allowed it and covered it up at the same time. Those jerks have trashed a reputation that many Canadian soldiers and diplomats gave their up lives in building. But the Brits really need someone to set up a third party that can get their political and law-enforcement houses in order.

    30. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Kuroji · · Score: 2, Funny

      I did not mean to imply that just because they've both exhibited some really poor behavior in the past it should put them on an even playing field. I do, however, mean to imply that no one should feel morally superior here due to the action of the military or intelligence agencies.

      Any moral superiority should be limited strictly to civilian law enforcement.

    31. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Well, try to tell them that about 1984.

    32. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

      Discussion, my ass -- they have no interest in being sued by the artists.

    33. Re:A Clockwork Orange by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are aware that A Clockwork Orange was fiction, aren't you? It was a movie and not a documentary.

      Yes, but it was based on the real life documentry Transistorized Carrot

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    34. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Kaleidoscopio · · Score: 1

      Next you are saying that 1984 isn't a documentary as well...

    35. Re:A Clockwork Orange by mathfeel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that's exactly what it's going to do -- the youth of Britain will identify ALL classical music as repugnant based on its use and the majority will want nothing to do with it. Indeed, they will want to see it burned.

      Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

      They would, but they can't afford to pay the perpetual copyright.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    36. Re:A Clockwork Orange by xaxa · · Score: 2

      I've only noticed it played in one location (a small railway station's entrance) and it was hardly blaring. It was bad quality -- I doubt the PA system is designed for classical music reproduction -- but it was quiet enough that it wouldn't annoy actual users of the station. You wouldn't notice it if you were talking to the person next to you as you walked through.

    37. Re:A Clockwork Orange by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was a sin because in the end it didn't ruin Beethoven for him it had the opposite effect and made violence a thing of beauty for him.

      ALEX's voice over at the end of the movie - "And what do you know, my brothers and only friends, it was the 9th, the glorious 9th of Ludwig van. Oh, it was gorgeosity and yummy yum yum. I was cured. As the music came to its climax, I could viddy myself very clear, running and running on like very light and mysterious feet, carving the whole face of the creeching world with my cut throat britva. I was cured all right."

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    38. Re:A Clockwork Orange by jack2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like classical music, if this was done in MY country, I'd make it my mission to destroy any and all of these classical music blaring speakers.

    39. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And our police and shops don't use classical music, flashing lights, or anything else to drive kids away.

      No, you just shoot them.

    40. Re:A Clockwork Orange by AlecC · · Score: 1

      But the Brits really need someone to set up a third party that can get their political and law-enforcement houses in order.

      We have a third party who might (or of course, might not) prove more ethical - the Lib Dems. But we have an electoral system that will never allow them to get in. They have been 15-25% of the vote for decades, but never got the point where they could influence, let alone control, policy because of the First Past The Post electoral system. Even if they are not the solution, a new Clean Party would have exactly the same hurdle to jump.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    41. Re:A Clockwork Orange by gmack · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your wrong.. both Canada and the US have been doing this for years. Was actually kind of sad in one case since they had a nice classical piece playing outside of a shop but inside it was Brittany Spears. I actually preferred being outside the store.

    42. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes and all the 'old' of Britain will identify ALL pop music as repugnant based on its...

      oh wait..

      (yes I can make generalizations too).

      I'd like to point you to advertisers who use Classical Music extensively to sell anything from Wholemeal bread to Paint to Cigars (people of a certain age from the UK will know what I am talking about) and as far as I can tell while it allows some humourous asides (oh yes that's the Dulux Advert Music) it doesn't put people who really give a damn about music off of it.

    43. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Terminus32 · · Score: 0

      Well, I dunno about reducing crime...I love listening to Ludwig van Beethoven whilst indulging in a bit of rape & ultra-violence! :-)

      --
      http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/
    44. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do our police beat people up in front of Gas Stations just for being black?

      See now how one incident, from one area is not representative of an entire country?

    45. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use music played by living people, whom have something to say about how someone can use their music. Or they should. Hate majors.

    46. Re:A Clockwork Orange by yacc143 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, the brochures are hard to come by.

      But it's actually easy to travel.

      Just make some federal agent believe that you are terrorist scum, and Uncle Sam will arrange the trip for you.

    47. Re:A Clockwork Orange by jimicus · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the anti-hero, Alex, liked Beethoven?

      He was reprogrammed - brainwashed, if you like - to find violence abhorrent by showing him films of violent acts. A side effect of this brainwashing was that he also found the background music used in these films abhorrent. And the music used was his favourite - Beethoven.

      If you enjoyed the film, read the book. It's.... rather darker, if such a thing were possible.

    48. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      come on boys, stop fighting!

      (getting up to turn music louder)

    49. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Ravn_Silvalar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My experience has not been that the music has been incredibly loud, it's been quite pleasant in fact.

      I found it quite funny when I first heard they were doing this at my local bus stop, I didn't think it would be a deterrent as it wouldn't have dettered me (I was a teen when they started doing this). Was surprised it worked though.

      Britains main problem isthe criminalising of its youth. They steadily reduced the amount of money going to youth programs and centres, thereby reducing the amount of places and free activities that children could go to and do. So as a result more and more of them started hanging around streets and at malls as they had no where else to go. This scared people seeing large "gangs of youth and about, assuming they must be upto no good.

      They are asked to move on by police or people because they are scaring people just by being there, made to feel like criminals and then we expect them to act better.

      Britain has seen a drop in most criminal activity despite Labours addition of several thousand new criminal laws since they came to power in 1997. Yet most people think the country has got worse, and seem to blame the youth more and more.

    50. Re:A Clockwork Orange by plover · · Score: 3, Informative

      He was appalled only by what was done to him. The aversion therapy twisted his love of the music into revulsion, even though he still wanted to love it.

      Otherwise, Alex enjoyed the pain and suffering of any other human for any reason whatsoever.

      --
      John
    51. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt it, they don't want to repel the "olds".

      A local coffee shop has done this for years. They're a little too close to the high school for comfort, so they installed a speaker outside playing classical/light jazz.

      The people who actually want to buy coffee don't mind the music, and now they don't have to elbow their way thru clumps of teenagers standing in front of the door.

      I'm not so happy about using it in detention, but I'm sure if I was a high school teacher I'd flip out and strangled someone on the first week, so I probably shouldn't throw stones.

    52. Re:A Clockwork Orange by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like classical music, if this was done in MY country, I'd make it my mission to destroy any and all of these classical music blaring speakers.

      I agree. It took me also a bit of maturing to enjoy classical music, the complexity in it and what it moves in a person. To me it's really like human excellence...

      Making it into a "weapon", creating a generation of yought seeing it as a weapon, load it with alot of negative association, it'll destroy your classical appreciation, or value attributed to it, in your next generation and hence you'll eventually whipe out the record of it, don't you think?

      There's alot of art, history and knowledge lost in history because of lack of appreciation or value attributed to it.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    53. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Faluzeer · · Score: 1

      or not..."It had been a wonderful evening and what I needed now, to give it the perfect ending, was a little of the Ludwig Von."

      Hmmm

      If memory servers me correctly that quote is from before Alex went to prison and had the treatment. After prison he could not stand classical music, indeed it was classical music (played very loudly) that caused Alex to attempt to commit suicide.

      It has been some time since I last watched the film, so I cannot remember what music it was that was played when he was locked in the room prior to the suicide attempt. I think (but am unsure) that it was the glorious 9th that was being played.

    54. Re:A Clockwork Orange by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      So was 1984 and yet they're using it as an instruction manual.

    55. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. It's much more humane.

    56. Re:A Clockwork Orange by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 0

      He was appalled only by what was done to him. The aversion therapy twisted his love of the music into revulsion, even though he still wanted to love it.

      Otherwise, Alex enjoyed the pain and suffering of any other human for any reason whatsoever.

      Very true. I wonder though whether he would have generally agreed with people not being able to enjoy Beethoven. His sadism and his love for Beethoven could well contradict in this matter. I don't remember a passage where a conclusive answer was given. Then again, I've seen this film more than 20 years ago and my memory may be playing tricks on me. Feel free to expand.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    57. Re:A Clockwork Orange by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      come on boys, stop fighting!

      Who you calling "boy"?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    58. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neil Diamond and Conway Twitty come to mind.

      Or maybe do easy listening/Muzak® versions of music popular with the undesired crowd.
      Back when stores in the US piped it in, I couldn't stand shopping in those places for long.

    59. Re:A Clockwork Orange by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

      A new meaning for the "Streisand effect"? Probably be twice as effective.

    60. Re:A Clockwork Orange by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      It isn't.... but Clockwork Orange actually a book first. It was about rebellion and youth and was set in 3 sections of 7 chapters each which added to 21 (the age of maturity according to the author). The last chapter was left out in the original American release by the publisher and that is what Kubrick used to create his screenplay, so the ending many take as sarcastic ("I was cured alright") is actually more serious.

      --
      Get a web developer
    61. Re:A Clockwork Orange by whyloginwhysubscribe · · Score: 1

      Hmm - maybe rather than trying to deter bad behaviour they should fix the cause of the problem, not the symptoms? Rather than sticking a speaker up, maybe they could put a basketball net up.

      I am so glad that I am not young poor and growing up in this country where they are treated like an underclass. Clockwork Orange was about a terrible way of punishing someone who had done terrible things, but this is about punishing young people who haven't necessarily done anything.

    62. Re:A Clockwork Orange by McGiraf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Any moral superiority should be limited strictly to civilian law enforcement."

      ROFL

    63. Re:A Clockwork Orange by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      who modded that troll?

    64. Re:A Clockwork Orange by mim · · Score: 1

      Yes, the beautiful 9th it was, and if you remember the end of the film he came full round to being able to listen to & enjoy it again...couldn't find the relevant quote for that part, will have to watch again.

    65. Re:A Clockwork Orange by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Classical music has a lot of variety. It's more than just "An Ode to Joy".

      If you wanted to, you could find a bit of "classical music" to repel just about anybody.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    66. Re:A Clockwork Orange by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Admit it. You just want to be a Disco Duck. Don't you?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    67. Re:A Clockwork Orange by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      Why should the cops have any moral superiority? There are numerous cases of police beatings, ridiculous charges, and general abuse by the cops. There are also the cases of people who have been accused of crimes and, after being locked away for decades, been exonerated through new evidence (or even just allowing the already existing evidence to be put forth). Any group with such power over people should never feel that it is morally above anyone else.

      --
      SSC
    68. Re:A Clockwork Orange by AmazingChicken · · Score: 0

      They're probably repelling people by playing it really loudly and with horrible quality. Classical music has a lot of high notes and when played poorly it's a lot like listening to nails on a chalkboard.

      Why not use elevator music, instead? [reference: Kentucky Fried Movie]

    69. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Rary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're probably repelling people by playing it really loudly and with horrible quality. Classical music has a lot of high notes and when played poorly it's a lot like listening to nails on a chalkboard.

      That's exactly what the 7-11 that all the teenagers used to hang out in front of back in the late 80's where I grew up in Canada used to do. This is nothing new.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    70. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe due to some very poor taste in humor, this could be modded as "funny", but i can't understand how this was even considered for insightful.

    71. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Rary · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet most people think the country has got worse, and seem to blame the youth more and more.

      You've just described every "older" generation in every country in the world all throughout human history.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    72. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lady ga ga would be a much more effective disciplinary tool.

    73. Re:A Clockwork Orange by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      In the US, we don't water board schoolchildren for loitering, regardless of whether or not we even water board enemies of the state anymore.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    74. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that A Clockwork Orange was fiction, aren't you? It was a movie and not a documentary.

      And you realize that Aversion Therapy, (what was portrayed in the film), was real, and that it was becoming quite popular at the time. They were using it to "cure homosexuality," among other things.

      Good fiction often has a social meaning, and one shouldn't draw the line between "fiction" and "documentary" quite as thick and dark as you seem to be doing.

    75. Re:A Clockwork Orange by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

      It was a funny joke But you didn't quite get it No laughter for you.

    76. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else almost spit milk out their nose after reading that? Oh man...

    77. Re:A Clockwork Orange by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      They should use Barry Manilow. Nobody would care if the youth of Britain hated his music.

    78. Re:A Clockwork Orange by digitig · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We've had socialised health care since 1948. State funded youth programs came much later. So we managed to pay for socialised health care without any impact at all on state-funded youth programs because they didn't exist at the time.

      Actually, most youth clubs and activities were organised by the private and charity sector -- Scogui, Boy's Brigade, random clubs in church halls, and so on. Those organisations are all feeling the economic pinch in the current recession, and a lot of them had religious connections and have been hit by declining religious involvement. I'd be interested to hear your theories as to how the worldwide recession and decline in religion are caused by UK socialised healthcare.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    79. Re:A Clockwork Orange by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 1

      Classical music gets played outside at my local cinema complex, which is more of a multiplex thing, as it has a bowling alley with arcade, a McDonalds, and a private gym with a swimming pool all in the one complex. It's a bit of an oddity, but the shape of it and its convenient awning makes it a magnet for chavs and other disaffected youth. The speakers aren't bad quality, but nothing special. I quite like it myself. They also play popular music, but generally older music you find on "best of" compilations and not chart stuff. McDonalds, of course, plays whatever the hell it feels like, but it's not a large enough restaurant for "loitering", as the entire place is in view of the counter staff.

    80. Re:A Clockwork Orange by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A local coffee shop has done this for years. They're a little too close to the high school for comfort, so they installed a speaker outside playing classical/light jazz.

      Ugh. Light jazz? What's that supposed to repel? People with taste? That crap is the worst kind of Muzak, not only repugnant to the senses, but the ultimate insult to what jazz is all about.

      --
      Ask me about my sig!
    81. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Clom · · Score: 1

      Can I have the this-is-old prize? This was being done at a downtown McDonalds in Dallas in the US 13 years ago where I read about at the time and you can too: http://www.dallasobserver.com/1997-04-24/news/mcfugue-no-cheese/

    82. Re:A Clockwork Orange by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 1

      This is very, very sad. I understand the youth aversion to classical music, except in that single school, is something prior to this measure, but to use it as some kind of repellent is insulting.

      Britain seems to be consistently following the wrong books.

      --
      The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
    83. Re:A Clockwork Orange by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      when I was teen in late 70s and 80s most of my friends played instruments, we were music geeks and were into wide variety of music. we liked classical, jazz, metal, rock n roll...don't think this would have worked on us

    84. Re:A Clockwork Orange by GSMacLean · · Score: 1

      Philadelphia airport does this throughout the entire airport - loud classical music blared 24/7 over PA speakers. Now don't get me wrong - I love classical music, but after a five hour layover there, I was ready to kill myself.

    85. Re:A Clockwork Orange by viridari · · Score: 1

      You've obviously not spent time in any place where people congregate to listen to country western music. Once you get past the stupid clothes, it's actually kind of a rowdy scene. I've seen more spilled blood and teeth at venues that play country music than hip hop or punk.

    86. Re:A Clockwork Orange by danlip · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

      They should be using Rick Astley.

    87. Re:A Clockwork Orange by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      or they get to like it I can just see chavs with the huge sound systems in there hot hatch blasting out 1kw of Bach organ music

    88. Re:A Clockwork Orange by rutledjw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is an interesting point, and hardly limited to the UK. In the US concern over crime in schools has led to numerous "zero tolerance" laws which cast far too wide a net often "catching" people for whom the law was never intended.

      Or, another but no less harmful side-effect (IMHO), is throwing the book at an at-risk kid who would be better served by more attentive staff and counseling. I realize fully it's easy to make such statements when schools are often overwhelmed and often underfunded (although I *WAS* surprised to learn many bay-area teachers make ~$100K) and have no ability to provide such services.

      Still, when funds are available I think some kind of intervention program would be more beneficial than "zero-tolerance" or being hassled by police as described by the parent post. Yes, there will be cases where an individual is incorrigible, but I think too many good apples are thrown out with the bad.

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    89. Re:A Clockwork Orange by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People have always thought things were getting worse as the country modernised. That phrase "going to the dogs" was coined in the 16th century.

      Unfortunately people like having someone to blame and the media creates fear where there need not be any. It's ironic that anti-social behaviour is now being "tackled" with more anti-social behaviour. I wonder what would happen if I set up an ultra-sonic siren to scare off dog walkers who foul the pavement near my house? What about "stinger" spike strips to roll out in front of cyclists and invalid carriage drivers who use the pavement? I should start playing recorded lectures on atheism out my window the next time the church/mosque next door starts that annoying worshipping and to discourage their followers from hanging around in groups near where I live?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    90. Re:A Clockwork Orange by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Clockwork Orange is the inspiration for this little blog entry we are all getting worked up about, but not for any of the alleged policies themselves. The whole thing is based on practically nothing - a quote from a "railway guy," and a report of a school where classical music is played in detention in hopes of calming the kids down. The rest is a bunch of pundits quoting each other. The inflamed response in here is a joke.

    91. Re:A Clockwork Orange by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Alex: No. No! NO! Stop it! Stop it, please! I beg you! This is sin! This is sin! This is sin! It's a sin, it's a sin, it's a sin! Dr. Brodsky: Sin? What's all this about sin? Alex: That! Using Ludwig van like that! He did no harm to anyone. Beethoven just wrote music! Dr. Branom: Are you referring to the background score? Alex: Yes. Dr. Branom: You've heard Beethoven before? Alex: Yes! Dr. Brodsky: So, you're keen on music? Alex: YES! Dr. Brodsky: Can't be helped. Here's the punishment element perhaps.

    92. Re:A Clockwork Orange by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      My experience has not been that the music has been incredibly loud, it's been quite pleasant in fact.

      Agreed. They often have classical music piped into certain tube stations, and I always thought it was just a nice attempt to improve that atmosphere of the place, rather than any nefarious ploy to scare off young people. It's not what I'd choose to listen to at home, but even as a teenager (only a few years ago) I found it quite enjoyable.

      That said 'youth' tends to be used by much (but not all) of the media as shorthand: it's a subset of people aged around 12-20 or so from a given socio-economic group with a given set of interests. Either that or they think young people all form an undifferentiated mass of of people with the aforementioned characteristics, anyway. It seems to be taken as gospel by these news sources that no person under this definition of 'youth' could possibly stand more than 20 seconds anything other than death metal or blaring rap music.

    93. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So was Children of Men (remember Bexhill?)

    94. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should violate Geneva conventions!

    95. Re:A Clockwork Orange by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      A lot of posters seem to be missing the point. As this is slashdot, I do completely understand, but:

      Ugh. Light jazz? What's that supposed to repel? People with taste?

      Light jazz repels kids that want to look cool to their friends. As does classic country, etc. It isn't that the sound is repugnant to their ears, it just cramps their style and makes them less cool.

      This really should have been obvious.

    96. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You, douche tool.

    97. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Zot+Quixote · · Score: 1

      The Libertarians? I mean...isolationism can be a moral high ground, unless you're say, ignoring a genocide. But domestically no way do you hold a candle to the Liberal Democrats. Even without bringing the anarcho-capitalists into it (paying for your own police and fire), the minarchist would abandon entitlements. Before the advent of social security more than half of all senior citizens died in poverty. Now almost none do. And the hilarious thing is, so called fiscal conservatives would destroy the economy. Money that goes into entitlements goes back into the economy. Money which the wealthy exploit from others is simply accumulated and not put back into the economy (they horde more than they spend, when compared to middle and lower classes).

    98. Re:A Clockwork Orange by morcego · · Score: 1

      Britains main problem isthe criminalising of its youth

      It is not. Their main problem is the warm beer.

      --
      morcego
    99. Re:A Clockwork Orange by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that's exactly what it's going to do -- the youth of Britain will identify ALL classical music as repugnant based on its use and the majority will want nothing to do with it. Indeed, they will want to see it burned.

      I posted this above, too, but you guys are dense beyond belief.

      It isn't a deterrent because they don't like the sounds hitting their ears.

      It deters because it simply is not cool. See the comment above about getting the same mileage out of light jazz.

    100. Re:A Clockwork Orange by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Eh? Where did you get the Libertarians from? I was talking about the Liberal Democrats, or a hypothetical newly founded Clean party if you don't think the Lib Dems are clean enough: they have been involved in the politics which has led us to this mucky hole, even if without power. I strongly reject the basic Libertarian principle: I believe that there is such a thing as Society, we are all part of it, and we owe something (though exactly what is more debatable) to it, just as we can expect to take from it in case of need.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    101. Re:A Clockwork Orange by cromar · · Score: 1

      Americans serve beer at far too cold a temperature. But at least it covers up the taste of the stuff...

    102. Re:A Clockwork Orange by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You mean that Donald Duck doesn't already do their lead vocals?

    103. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      They thought it was an instructional video actually.

      I'm more familiar with the Mad Magazine version "A Clockwork Lemon" anyway.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    104. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just read a study (sorry, don't remember source) that studied people's impression of crime vs the actual crime rate. People in the 70s, when crime rates were high, actually felt that crime was LESS of a problem vs today when crime rates are lower. People seem to exaggerate problems more the smaller they get, like having a grain of sand in your eye.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    105. Re:A Clockwork Orange by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should use some music whose artists aren't several hundred years dead, then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

      How are they going to get around the asinine copyright laws to do that? I seem to remember some stories of lawsuits happening in Britain because some woman was playing the radio for her horses and such... do you really think that any new music would be legal to play like that?

    106. Re:A Clockwork Orange by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 1

      A lot of posters seem to be missing the point. As this is slashdot, I do completely understand, but:

      Ugh. Light jazz? What's that supposed to repel? People with taste?

      Light jazz repels kids that want to look cool to their friends. As does classic country, etc. It isn't that the sound is repugnant to their ears, it just cramps their style and makes them less cool.

      This really should have been obvious.

      So obvious, in fact, that I didn't bother addressing it. I was taking an opportunity to make a disparaging comment about light "jazz" (which may be better than listening to kittens being bludgeoned to death, but it really cramps my style). Try to keep up.

      --
      Ask me about my sig!
    107. Re:A Clockwork Orange by RedEars · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with the "net being cast too wide" argument when it comes to violence, weapons, etc in schools. However, more attentive staff and counseling only goes so far. The real turning point in this problem is more attentive parenting.

      --
      He who forgets will be destined to remember. - EV
    108. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that Alex DeLarge actually liked Ludwig Von.

      Ludwig van, not von.

    109. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Anyone with your impeccable cool credentials probably doesn't buy their coffee at a chain like Tim Horton's anyway, so they're not out anything.

    110. Re:A Clockwork Orange by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      it is not politically possible for elected officials (or those hired/firable by elected officials) to tell their constituents to do a better job raising their kids.

      also, i ascribe the desire to blame the kids on two things: the truism that kids need to rebel in order to establish their own sense of self, and the adults' unwillingness to be introspective and assign the rest of the blame where it belongs: on themselves.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    111. Re:A Clockwork Orange by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Imposition generates frustration, frustration leads to anger, anger leads to hate, and we all know where hate leads to because we all love Master Yoda.

      Really, this is akin to choking you with cheeseburgers until you absolutely hate them forever.

      --
      NO SIG
    112. Re:A Clockwork Orange by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      then perhaps the artists could have a very interesting discussion as to the use of their music...

      "Look here, inspector. We've got another copyright takedown notice, this one for the trolley at Kensington. I reckon we'll need to change the song."

      "Reckon again, leftenent. You up the volume and let those songsters see wot it means to tackle the long arm of the law. They'll soon see they aren't in Kansas anymore, they're not."

    113. Re:A Clockwork Orange by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Our children's children will eat us for dinner at some point. I have just managed to accept this fact and actually welcome our new youth, blood related canibal overlords

      --
      NO SIG
    114. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... listen to the Avett Brothers... "Love Like The Movies" and then "Laundry Room" when you're ready to get serious... then start working your way back. Patsy Cline was a goddess.

    115. Re:A Clockwork Orange by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, the problem is that the left equates "society" with "government." We don't owe ANYTHING to our government; it's just a necessary evil.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    116. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (although I *WAS* surprised to learn many bay-area teachers make ~$100K)

      While I don't necessarily disbelieve this, I would like clarification on the grade-levels and whether they taught in public or private schools. However, in any case the SF bay-area isn't representative of the entire country. For example, I have an aunt who teaches middle-school in a public school district in the Milwaukee metropolitan area, she's a few years away from retirement and I doubt she makes half of that!

    117. Re:A Clockwork Orange by lgw · · Score: 1

      a lot of them had religious connections and have been hit by declining religious involvement

      This. I don't give to private charities, as the government gives over $20K of my money each year to other people through various social programs, making it easy to rationalize. However, if I were socially involved with a church I'm sure I be giving anyway, and volunteering time to help organize activities.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    118. Re:A Clockwork Orange by morcego · · Score: 1

      Trust me, things in Brazil are not any better than in USA.

      I just hate Pilsener beer (or Pilsen, as it is called around here). At least we can find Red Ale, and some other real beers, from small breweries, if you know where to look.

      --
      morcego
    119. Re:A Clockwork Orange by lgw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like a personal problem. When I listen to smooth jazz in public, I'm so cool that people nearby decide that smooth jazz is cool. Maybe you should work on that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    120. Re:A Clockwork Orange by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Entirely agreed. Government should be the machinery we have set up to implement the necessary interchanges in society - a means to an end. the trouble is that it all to often becomes an end in its own right.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    121. Re:A Clockwork Orange by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      It sounds like operant conditioning:

      0) student misbehaves
      1) student is subjected to classical music during detention
      2) student associates classical music with punishment
      3) to avoid unnecessary "punishment", student avoids bus stop.

      And it's contagious, in a way: kid says "let's leave, I don't like this music", friends get accustomed to not liking that music, or simply to leaving when that type of music is played.

    122. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clockwork Orange was a documentary:

      - gangs of youth running about with no course of law or society willing to stop them

      - full out consumer society

      - Rampant drug and alcohol use

      - inept government, that changes with the political wind.

      - Phallic symbols everywhere!!

      - Urban blight

      - Electronic music, computers, and digital media

      - Elderly and homeless thrown into the streets

      - Pet Snakes!

      Tell me again how it's NOT a documentary......

      KG

    123. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Sique · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or the crime rates actually drop when people think crime is a problem, and they raise as soon as people don't care as much anymore.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    124. Re:A Clockwork Orange by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The goal is to drive the naughty teens away, not to drive everyone away.

      Besides, it's a WMD, so it's prohibited in civilized countries anyway.

    125. Re:A Clockwork Orange by bobs666 · · Score: 1

      Great call, First thing I thought of was A Clockwork Orange.

      But no problem, Shields on "Ipod" actavated.

      BTW, I like Classical music so I am immune.

    126. Re:A Clockwork Orange by jackspenn · · Score: 1

      I will never forget being in London at a bar that had two Genius taps, one traditional and one labeled "Extra Cold".

      --
      Respect the Constitution
    127. Re:A Clockwork Orange by andreyvul · · Score: 1

      more than 20 seconds anything other than death metal or blaring rap music

      You forgot techno.

      --
      proud caffeine whore
    128. Re:A Clockwork Orange by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      It could also be the troublemakers tend to be narrow minded and have no taste

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    129. Re:A Clockwork Orange by lucian1900 · · Score: 1

      I've come to Britain to study. I really want to leave as soon as possible.

    130. Re:A Clockwork Orange by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Did you forget to take your meds again.

    131. Re:A Clockwork Orange by fear025 · · Score: 1

      Is the food really that bad?

    132. Re:A Clockwork Orange by BeanThere · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd be interested to hear your theories as to how the worldwide recession and decline in religion are caused by UK socialised healthcare.

      Isn't it just what you said in your own post ... money that used to be in private hands organised youth clubs and activities via the private / charity / church etc. sectors; nowadays that money gets taxed instead and spent by government on bigger/broader programs (which are also less religion-focused than e.g. a local church). As the state has gotten bigger, it's programs have supplanted more effective grass-roots ones that used to solve the problem at local level in communities, but now money is diverted from those to the state. The bigger the state gets, the less money every other non-state individual or organisation has, it's very simple.

    133. Re:A Clockwork Orange by rendermaniac · · Score: 1

      Plus who would volunteer to work with children with all the stories in the news? You'd be automatically labelled as weird.

    134. Re:A Clockwork Orange by digitig · · Score: 1

      Well, judging the level of taxation by how late tax freedom day is, I don't think UK taxation as high now as it was in the early 1980s (I can only find general articles, though -- if anybody can point me to a record of when tax freedom day was in past years I'd be most interested). It looks as if the increase in spending on youth projects that I recall (but again can't find details of) in the 1980 s and early 90s happened at a time of falling taxation. So I think your argument is directly contrary to the facts, but I'd love to get my hands on the actual numbers.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    135. Re:A Clockwork Orange by blueturffan · · Score: 1

      If they're planning on turning it up to 11, then Spinal Tap should be the band of choice.

    136. Re:A Clockwork Orange by digitig · · Score: 1

      Yep. I've stopped doing voluntary work with children for just that reason. Well, not fear of being labelled weird, which I'm pretty much reconciled to, but the way it's now so easy for one stupid or malicious person to ruin one's life.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    137. Re:A Clockwork Orange by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      As an educator, a large part of our problem is not our payscale (in Texas urban areas the average is ~50k roughly equal to SF ~100k in terms of cost of living), but rather that there is insufficient infrastructure / support and class sizes that are too large. Reducing pay and hiring more teachers won't work because we would have to take a more than 50% cut to double the number of teachers (taxes / benefits / management / etc.). And we do need to double the number of teachers. I work at a fairly good school and we have some classes with 40 students in the room. One honors course of which I am aware has 39 students. The closer we can get to a 1:1 ratio, the better (yes, I know, completely unrealistic, but I'd even settle for 20:1). Raising taxes won't help - again, no one is going to agree to more than double their taxes.

      Our district has an interesting approach wherein they seek donations along the lines of the local universities (with significant results lately). Strangely enough, one other thing we have noticed that seems to be effective is hiring teachers part time (most still work enough for benefits so it is not cost effective in terms of pure numbers). The schools with the most part-time teachers have the highest attendance / graduation / test scores / etc. Unfortunately, there are limits on the number of part-timers we can have (both financially and for accrediting apparently).

    138. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Britains main problem isthe criminalising of its youth. They steadily reduced the amount of money going to youth programs and centres, thereby reducing the amount of places and free activities that children could go to and do. So as a result more and more of them started hanging around streets and at malls as they had no where else to go. This scared people seeing large "gangs of youth and about, assuming they must be upto no good.

      They are asked to move on by police or people because they are scaring people just by being there, made to feel like criminals and then we expect them to act better."

      Yes, that would be it. You idiot.

    139. Re:A Clockwork Orange by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      It looks as if the increase in spending on youth projects that I recall (but again can't find details of) in the 1980 s and early 90s happened at a time of falling taxation. So I think your argument is directly contrary to the facts, but I'd love to get my hands on the actual numbers.

      BTW, I'm talking about over a much longer period --- I mean, you said yourself, "We've had socialised health care since 1948", so the state has been diverting increasing amounts of income from local initiatives for at least 60 years. 'Later on', as you said, youth programs were added --- i.e. diverting still more income.

      As for being "contrary to the facts", well, there are so many variables at play it's difficult to impartially draw conclusions.

    140. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I am not a jazz listener. Is light jazz the same thing as smooth jazz?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    141. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money which the wealthy exploit from others is simply accumulated and not put back into the economy (they horde more than they spend, when compared to middle and lower classes).

      I'm not a fiscal conservative, but that simply isn't true. Putting money in the proverbial mattress is the LAST thing someone interested in making more money would do. Most people with money to spare and nothing particular to spend it on will put it in a bank or investment fund. This money is the same money that finances loans for things like mortgages, business loans, etc (and to a small extend, bankers' salaries, who spend, or at least re-invest). So it does go back into the economy, but in large lump sums rather than dozens of tiny payments.

      Having said that, I do agree that libertarianism either ignores or encourages moneys' tendency towards entropy; it tends to funnel towards those who already have it, because they're good at getting it and because there are A LOT of monetary systems which implicitly favour the incumbent (a poor individual cannot diversify themselves against risk in the same way a rich individual can). As someone who thinks that degenerating into a survival-of-the-fittest jungle is anathema to the very concept of society and civilisation (which I consider good), I think this is wrong.

    142. Re:A Clockwork Orange by digitig · · Score: 1

      BTW, I'm talking about over a much longer period --- I mean, you said yourself, "We've had socialised health care since 1948", so the state has been diverting increasing amounts of income from local initiatives for at least 60 years.

      Well, if you are looking over a much longer period and talking about the state diverting resources from local inititives then you should really be looking at the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars and the government's attempts then to pay back a national debt that (as a proportion of GDP) would make today's economists' eyes water. Socialised health care seems to be a complete red-herring, particularly considering that the total spent on health care per capita in the UK doesn't seem much different from the total spent per capita in developed countries that don't have socialised health care, so it isn't actually diverting resources at all.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    143. Re:A Clockwork Orange by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Mind you, in the book Alex basically just grows up and gets over it. He gets bored with ultra-violence and goes on to lead a more-or-less normal life.

      And as for the helpful translation, below: Wow, you are one insightful dude. And here I thought he might have a cut throat banana peel.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    144. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I counter with Leon.

      Stansfield: You don't like Beethoven. You don't know what you're missing. Overtures like that get my... juices flowing.

    145. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anthelme · · Score: 1

      hey if it sells more CD's and they give another FREE concert I'd be for it!

    146. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      I'm always bitterly amused when people here in the States whine about kids spending too much time inside playing videogames while at the same time making it virtually impossible for them to do anything else.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    147. Re:A Clockwork Orange by cromar · · Score: 1

      Wait, you mean Guinness right? That's interesting. The last time I was there, I never saw cold beer for sale at bars. (And I was in quite a few of them >:)

    148. Re:A Clockwork Orange by cromar · · Score: 1

      Pilsner is good for when you want to get drunk or you are hot, I guess is what people are thinking... (or when you are being a cheap skate, see getting drunk.) Anymore, it seems more logical to find some cheap vodka over Pilsners and malt liquors, and save money for a nice Belgian or Trappist or IPA, etc.

    149. Re:A Clockwork Orange by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Mind you, in the book Alex basically just grows up and gets over it."

      In that case I think the movie is far more profound.

      "And as for the helpful translation, below: Wow, you are one insightful dude. And here I thought he might have a cut throat banana peel."

      Thanks. Keep reading books it will help you with your comprehension. :P

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    150. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should switch to country western. No loss there.

      You insensitive clod. I like country western music.

    151. Re:A Clockwork Orange by fishexe · · Score: 1

      It was a sin because in the end it didn't ruin Beethoven for him it had the opposite effect and made violence a thing of beauty for him.

      Wasn't that already the case?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    152. Re:A Clockwork Orange by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      In that case I think the movie is far more profound.

      You could argue that. I don't think your interpretation of the movie is quite right, though. What happens is that Alex is tortured by Mr. Alexander, and to escape he jumps out the window. This comes to the attention of the public, who have been told that Alex was "cured" by the Ludovico treatment, and becomes a big embarrassment for the parties involved. To avoid being blamed for a treatment that apparently drove Alex to attempt suicide, the government "undoes" the Ludovico treatment. So at the end of the movie, Alex is merely back where he was at the beginning.

      That's where the movie ends, and I suppose it's "profound," in the sense that its message seems to be that the horrible (but independent-minded) Alex is actually better than the hypocritical government and other people who tried to use his plight for political ends.

      Unfortunately, the movie was based on an abridged version of the book that appeared in the American market, which omitted the final chapter. In that final chapter, as I have said, Alex grows beyond his life of ultra-violence, leaves the gang, and contemplates having a child of his own (who, he considers, may turn out to be just as violent and horrible as he was as a young man).

      To me, this final chapter drives home Burgess's point, which was to criticize the British welfare state and the moralizing do-gooders that it tends to empower. The Ludovico treatment "fixed" Alex, but it removed his power of choice. Mr. Alexander, who was critical of the government's treatment, wanted to use Alex to demonstrate the government's wrongheadedness, but as it turned out he actually hated Alex and wanted to torture him. The government reversed the Ludovico treatment, but not out of a desire to help Alex, but merely to protect itself from further embarrassment. Throughout the story, Alex's parents are impotent and fail to exert any influence over him. And in the end, for all the back-and-forth between counselors and doctors, government agents and revolutionaries, none of it matters at all; eventually Alex just turns 21, grows up, and gets on with his life. All that moralizing, all the meddling of the nanny-state, was completely pointless and hypocritical. "A Clockwork Orange" is a criticism of that society, as Anthony Burgess saw it. In the book, Alex is not a hero, and by the end he's not a villain either. He's just an everyman, responding to the circumstances of his surroundings. In that sense I think the book is much more "profound" than the movie's comparatively adolescent viewpoint, which appears merely to want to titillate the viewer with "Alex as anti-hero."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    153. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there is a dystopian piece of fiction they won't try. They've done 1984, Clockwork Orange, I bet they are filling up the flamethrowers for the Farenheit 451 LARP. I would rule out Brave New World because it thinks a bit too much of the children, ah, and drugs are like, evil.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    154. Re:A Clockwork Orange by QuietObserver · · Score: 1

      In the words of Captain Hollister (from Red Dwarf): Someone with "more teeth than brain cells."

      He was actually referring to Arnold Rimmer, but it applies equally well to anyone who would mod a comment like that (the GPs) "Troll" in my opinion.

    155. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      This is one of the best posts on /. Hats off to you, sir.

    156. Re:A Clockwork Orange by lgw · · Score: 1

      Smooth jazz is a radio format. It's basically pop-style instramental music, with a small rotation of currently popular hits. I don't think "light" jazz is so well defined, but people often use the term to mean smooth jazz, or in general instramental music that's "not really jazz". I prefer the term "sugar-free jazz" to describe the latter.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    157. Re:A Clockwork Orange by lpq · · Score: 1

      You are aware that today's scifi becomes tomorrow future...well, just another example of scifi becoming reality...

      Classical music as social control? This very much fits the UK "archetype". :-)

    158. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horrorshow, horrorshow. These vecks are getting real bezoomny over the ludovico.

    159. Re:A Clockwork Orange by plover · · Score: 1

      The last time I watched the movie, I didn't care about "rebellion" or "youth". I interpreted it as a question of "how far would I be willing to let society go to deal with violent criminals?" Alex was so heinous, so over-the-top despicable, and manipulative of the system, would I be willing to let someone like that be "chemically imprisoned" or "chemically castrated?" Should his victim's husband be given the right to torture him to death? Should society simply kill him, quick and easy? Should we spend millions on life imprisonment?

      There are no easy answers, although for me at no point did "return him to the streets" become a viable option.

      --
      John
    160. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      'hypocritiser' ... afaik that isn't a word, something like something retarded that bush would say though. BTW nuke-u-lar isn't a word either :/

    161. Re:A Clockwork Orange by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "I suppose it's "profound," in the sense that its message seems to be that the horrible (but independent-minded) Alex is actually better than the hypocritical government and other people who tried to use his plight for political ends"

      That's what I got out of it, although for me the ending speech puts Alex in the position of a government manafactured Frakenstien. I saw the whole thing as a warning that said a society that aims to rid itself of violence through "phycological eugenics" will ultimately destroy itself. I'm not sure how old you are but there was a general fear in the late 60's - early 70's of government mandated "Skinner boxes" for humans. The ending of the book sounds more like a real world senario. Damm you, I will have to go and read it now....

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    162. Re:A Clockwork Orange by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was, as someone else has suggested the whole thing mearly put him back to where he had started. It's been a long time since I watched the movie and there are a million different ways to interpret Kubrick (which is why I like his stuff).

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    163. Re:A Clockwork Orange by shnull · · Score: 1

      it's called labelling and it's a well know socio and psychological phenomenon, maybe Brit guvs should be sent back to school before they pass any more of those hilariously basic human rights defying laws

      --
      beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
    164. Re:A Clockwork Orange by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      You are aware that A Clockwork Orange was fiction, aren't you?

      Never! I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell you!

      You mean that the messages I get from the Korova Bar every so often are a delusion of mine? And the occasional evening I spend there criticizing the owner's wiring (he's an electrician) and drinking surprisingly well-priced beer are also delusions.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    165. Re:A Clockwork Orange by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      Which is of course why the movie is worse then the book, as they left out the last chapter. The 21st chapter, a number symbolic of adulthood, where Alex discovers on his own that the violence of his youth has stop being as appealing, even without external enforcement. In other words, he grows up. Thus the whole meaning of the story is changed.

      --
      snig
    166. Re:A Clockwork Orange by stararmy · · Score: 1

      Replace Britain with Japan and you have the beginnings of the "Battle Royale" Program. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_Royale

    167. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People's impressions lag behind the events, they are in response to them, so I doubt that is true.

    168. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like masochism on the national level. A nation destroying its own future by destroying its offspring, and thereby destroying itself.
      Well, if it were for them... let them. It’s hurting us.

      But hey. The only thing we need to win... is time! ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    169. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Don’t worry. Our children or our children’s children, will use classical music to rebel against us. Because they will know we hate it.

      I call “most polite youth rebellion ever!”! ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    170. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean... redubbed? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    171. Re:A Clockwork Orange by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Orrrrr trust for authority and the competence of the police has reduced, so people stop discovering or reporting crime. As for all those independent crime surveys: how many kids are going to say, "Why, yes, I have been subjected to a beating, and that is a crime - must answer this honestly!"? If I receive any sort of survey claiming to be anonymous, the first thing I do is assume that it is not.

      It is like surveys which ask teenagers whether they are sexually active. Here's a clue: almost all males overstate their sexual prowess.

    172. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Ah, you've experienced the new Old Fogey Discouragement System!

    173. Re:A Clockwork Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove those statements. Assumptions are just that.

      It is very unlikely that serious crime (violent rape, serious assault, murder, etc) goes unreported.

    174. Re:A Clockwork Orange by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, it is for you to prove that crimes in general are reported or discovered, or at the very least to provide studies confirming the soundness of the methodology used in and/or independent statistics confirming the accuracy of the govt-sponsored BCS.

      As for the most serious of crimes, I have no idea why you using a worst case to argue an average case assertion. I would also be keen to understand why you think it is "unlikely" that violent rape and assault goes unreported: perhaps you are making assumptions about the mental state of the victim, or even projecting your own trust of authority on them?

  2. Shades of Clockwork Orange by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It was set in the UK, IIRC.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  3. Hmm. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clockwork orange anybody?

  4. A Clockwork Orange by fear025 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    from A Clockwork Orange:
    Alex: No. No! NO! Stop it! Stop it, please! I beg you! This is sin! This is sin! This is sin! It's a sin, it's a sin, it's a sin!
    Dr. Brodsky: Sin? What's all this about sin?
    Alex: That! Using Ludwig van like that! He did no harm to anyone. Beethoven just wrote music!
    Dr. Branom: Are you referring to the background score?
    Alex: Yes.
    Dr. Branom: You've heard Beethoven before?
    Alex: Yes!
    Dr. Brodsky: So, you're keen on music?
    Alex: YES!
    Dr. Brodsky: Can't be helped. Here's the punishment element perhaps.

  5. Next problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Groups of retired people, hanging around busstops.
    Pestering innocent by-passers...

    1. Re:Next problem... by umghhh · · Score: 0, Redundant
      "Groups of people, hanging around busstops, Pestering innocent by-passers".

      here I fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Next problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hell's Grannies"

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CStfT8gCrjM

    3. Re:Next problem... by j-b0y · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or vicious gangs of Keep Left signs

      --
      Please remain calm, there is no reason to pani... wait, where are you all going?
    4. Re:Next problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groups of retired people, hanging around busstops.
      Pestering innocent by-passers...

      That sounds familiar...

    5. Re:Next problem... by gnomeza · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right, stop that!
      This thread's got silly.
      It started off with a nice idea about grannies attacking young men, but now it's got silly.
      And this "j-bay's" userid is too ordinary for a +1 funny too.

    6. Re:Next problem... by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      Hells Grannies!

    7. Re:Next problem... by mackil · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Next problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop it right there; this thread is getting far too silly.

    9. Re:Next problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, Iron Maiden and KoRn will solve that problem easily.

    10. Re:Next problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make tea, not love.

  6. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like classical music needed less fans, now they've made people actively afraid of it.

    1. Re:Great... by dsavi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whoops, didn't mean to post that as an anonymous coward... o_O

    2. Re:Great... by Pentium100 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry. If this method is continued then, by natural selection, more and more young people will stop hating classical music and may even start liking it. The cool guys will be those who can finish the graffiti or whatever before running away.

    3. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoops, didn't mean to post that as an anonymous coward...

      As if that was YOU! You're just trying to take credit for my insightful comment. :)

    4. Re:Great... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The operators of a shopping centre near my home have started doing this in an area where teenagers tend to hang around outside. The thing is the spot the kids are using is ideal for the purpose. Its out of the way and a bit dirty. Nobody else goes there and its not really a place people walk through. So I don't really see a point beyond a vague "we don't like them" sentiment.

    5. Re:Great... by hughbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely correct. I'm nearly 60 but this also means that I can remember the 60s (vaguely, if you know all those jokes) when we were 'allowed' (with guitars, sometimes) into public space.

      The current UK trend is to deny youth any use of public space (we've just locked a churchyard because of the occasional bit of trouble), remove benches and exert social control on all gathering youth. Where are these guys and gals supposed to go? Oh, I know, to McDonalds or some place where they spend money, that's OK.

      We badly need to get back to a mixture of tolerance, being less fearful and, on the other side making kids aware of how to use and co-exist in public space (we managed, with on/off brushes with the police) with the 'olds'. All this repression is idiotic, ineffective and counterproductive (because it alienates rather than teaches).

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    6. Re:Great... by bytesex · · Score: 1

      And, with the purported positive influence such music has, it may even educate one or two, or stop a crime from being committed a bit further down the road. I can't see anything but good things to come from this.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    7. Re:Great... by dintech · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the type of teenagers we're talking about aren't guitar playing hippie creative types. These kids hang around drinking and taking drugs late in to the night... oh wait.

    8. Re:Great... by RavenChild · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this video of a cop chasing off some kids just trying to be kids.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h2KD5FTkkw

      Removing youth from pro-social environments like this only promotes hatred of "the man" and forces them into hiding. Once in hiding, they gain anti-social attitudes resulting in activities far worse than loitering in public places (where they did no real harm in the first place).

    9. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current UK trend is to deny youth any use of public space (we've just locked a churchyard because of the occasional bit of trouble), remove benches and exert social control on all gathering youth.

      Yep. And it's not just aimed at the youth -- there's a huge amount of work going into anti-homeless harassment. And anti-skateboarding.

      I used to work in a downtown area. Wherever there were free-standing handrails, they soon started welding or brazing on little bars every two feet to keep skateboards off. Wherever there were long concrete spaces to sit, they bored holes and epoxied in crossbars every eighteen inches to "define the seats" so homeless people wouldn't be able to lay down for a nap in the sun.

      Vicious gentrification bastards.

      P.S. I'm well over 60 and I still think that kind of stuff is disgraceful. The property owners are just like a bunch of dogs going around pissing on every rock in "their" territory.

    10. Re:Great... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      The current UK trend is to deny youth any use of public space (we've just locked a churchyard because of the occasional bit of trouble), remove benches and exert social control on all gathering youth. Where are these guys and gals supposed to go?

      Public Space?! Public Space?!? The young ones doan't know nought aboot the 'ardships of life these days. In my day, in my day, we; we 'ad to make do with the radio and telly and videyo games. We stayed indoors we did, playin' Super Mario and Sonic the we 'edgehog. Proper pastimes those! Taught us 'ow t'entertain ourselves they did.

      'angin'g about in Public Space?! What kind've a pastime d'you call that?! Now'days with d'Internet and mobile phones, there's plenty 'nuff t'do indoars for the day without clatterin' about outside loitrin' on street coarners. Ger'roff of it ye layabouts!! Get a game handle!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    11. Re:Great... by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May be it was more or less innocent in the 60s (except that Manson bloke) and that may be was one of the reasons it was allowed and now it is not allowed because it grew to much sinister things.

      The curbing of any freedoms start with the most obvious cases supported by everybody (forbidding "fire!" in the theatre free speech, e.g.), then goes to less popular cases ("pedophilia"), then it could be a ban on making photos of police (UK), then it could become a ban on foul language against government officials and it could end up with a system of bans on almost any speech (like in Northern Korea).

      But same is true for the movement in opposite direction as well: first freedoms that are allowed are the most obvious ones, then less obvious and then you can end up with ridiculous "freedoms" that end up harming the society.

      Sustained society (with healthy reproduction of it's core defining tenets from generation to generation) implements some sort of balance between allowing and curbing of freedoms that was achieved during decades of trial and error.

      The understanding of what constitutes freedoms and what not constantly changes in Western society. It is obvious that every current snapshot of currently allowed freedoms is not some kind of scientific truth, but a result of social agreement, social contract.

      In the Western model there is no right and wrong except what is defined by some kind of core (majority, powers to be, media, charismatic figures, celebrities, some kind of elite, etc. - very vague and hard to define group really) of society.

      So getting back to your observation: in 60s it was that way, now it is this way, tomorrow it will be a different way - but what is clear that it hardly affects the principles of Western society.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    12. Re:Great... by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      Skateboards leave marks when they slide. Very hard to clean off.

    13. Re:Great... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Something in the US bill of rights about "Right to Assemble" got lost when applied to minors here - the town I grew up in systematically eliminated any place where more than 3 or 4 "children" were seen having fun after 8pm. Some pretty damn brutal things happened to some of the pensioners in the following years, all isolated incidents, but I still question whether or not that elderly couple would have been killed and had their car and cash stolen and used for a trip to Disney World if the kids didn't a) hate the old people as a class and b) have something remotely entertaining to do in their own town besides sit home and plot how to get back at the geezers that put them "in their place" at every opportunity.

      Hazards of living in a retirement community (my county had the highest per-capita death rate in the nation during those years, primary cause of mortality: old age).

    14. Re:Great... by dsavi · · Score: 1

      Why thank you. :)

    15. Re:Great... by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      We need parents be more responsible about raising their kids so they don't get into fistfights every time they gather. The problem got so bad at a local mall that they now won't let kids loiter outside the building, they have to wait until their ride comes (apparently if they are loitering around outside they get in more fights).

    16. Re:Great... by radtea · · Score: 1

      And anti-skateboarding

      Anti-skateboarding is just anit-youth in another guise. A couple of years ago I used roller-blades as my primary means of transport, and was never hastled by the cops (I'm in my forties) while at the same time I regularly saw kids on skateboards being ticketed.

      In the most extreme case a cop was ticketing a kid while I was sitting on the curb just down the block taking my skates off, being completely ignored by the cop. The kid and I shared a look, shrugged. We both saw the contradition, both knew what the score was, and knew that there wasn't a damned thing either of us could do about it.

      Even the cop was probably aware of what was going on: they have their priorities handed too them by the folks above, and for the most part try to do the best they can despite that.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    17. Re:Great... by VlartBlart · · Score: 1

      Most of them don't have any repsect for public spaces! I live in a pleasant town in South East England and in the summer like to go to down my local park with some friends, have a picnic, bottle of wine and play some Frisbee or football etc. Everytime there's a group of 'yoofs' there they leave a stinking pile of rubbish even though they have to walk past a bin on their way out.

      Yesterday at the train station I saw a group of 6 'yoofs' walk out of the waiting room with that typical 'I don't give a fuck' look - I went in the waiting room - it stank of smoke, was littered with beer cans and burger boxes and there was huge globs of spit on the chairs. (I have nothing against smoking or drinking - I do both. I even eat the odd burger (but that's beside the point))

      We (England) have a major problem with some of our kids - they are feral, violent, rude and they don't care about anything but themselves.

    18. Re:Great... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think much of the problem is the parenting. Most kids these days here in the USA are borne by poorer parents; richer people have fewer kids, and frequently no kids. As a result, a large percentage of children in the USA grow up in poverty. Poor parents don't do a great job of raising their kids, either because they don't know how, or don't care, or don't have time because they're trying to work two jobs to get ahead. So the kids grow up to be criminals. Wealthier couples who would make better parents for the most part aren't having as many kids (and I don't blame them; they're expensive, and there's too many people as it is).

      When the lowest rungs of society are creating and raising the next generation, we can't expect very good results.

      I have no idea what the answer is, except perhaps to forcibly sterilize poor couples after they have one or two children so they stop creating so many criminals. Obviously, that's not going to happen.

    19. Re:Great... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      It may not affect principles (though I think that's debatable) but it definitely affects the quality.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    20. Re:Great... by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Re "Score:0, Offtopic", it annoys the crap out of me when mods mod admissions/corrections like this negatively --- it's just the poster clarifying the identity of who posted the comment, how can that possibly be "off topic", it's just neutral.

    21. Re:Great... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      But quality itself is determined by the same methodology, isn't it? So what is perceived as a decrease of quality in one times, might be perceived as increase of quality in different times. It's really hard not to be a subjective idealist when it comes to social phenomena in Western world

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    22. Re:Great... by Geminii · · Score: 1

      "If it's not an activity involving spending money, we don't want it happening near us."

  7. No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The speaker is probably mounted on a CCTV.

  8. Calculus Gang by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it's attracting the Calculus Gang and the Bach Gang. They wrote 30,000 digits of pi all over the bus stop last week. Cost the city 20 grand to remove it all.

    1. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was the XKCD gang. They thought they were being funny.

    2. Re:Calculus Gang by mickwd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next week they're gonna start playing "Bye bye, Miss American pi" to counter that.

    3. Re:Calculus Gang by MadKeithV · · Score: 3, Funny

      Drove my Chevy to Shumacher-Levy?

    4. Re:Calculus Gang by dakameleon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Singin' this'll be the day that I... (rolls 2d6 to save...) die...

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    5. Re:Calculus Gang by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      Modern geeks would use a 20-sided die.

    6. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that crap like Mozart could possibly attract a true Bach gang.

      Hahaha, my captcha word is "cosine" for submitting this.

    7. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      halfway the chevy ran dry

    8. Re:Calculus Gang by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was the XKCD gang. They thought they were being funny.

      Wait, XKCD is supposed to be funny?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool! You mean 6.366197723675814*pi grand.

    10. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They wrote 30,000 digits of pi all over the bus stop last week. Cost the city 20 grand to remove it all."

      Darn! They were almost to the end before they were interrupted.

    11. Re:Calculus Gang by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      No, it's meant to be a new expression of realism in art.

    12. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And modern geeks would be wrong. ;)

    13. Re:Calculus Gang by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would only have cost 10 grand if the University professors hadn't insisted on copying the proofs down before the city cleaned it off.

    14. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the comments? Those were funny.

      Yours? It was fucking stupid. I had to look up wtf that meant, and I face-palmed when I did. Please don't procreate.

    15. Re:Calculus Gang by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Singin' this'll be the day that I... (rolls 2d6 to save...) die...

      Everyone knows a saving throw is a d20 roll...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    16. Re:Calculus Gang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, XKCD is supposed to be funny?

      Well, this certainly makes it funny. (warning: NSFW)

    17. Re:Calculus Gang by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      sorry, sorry, I meant to say "for damage"...

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
  9. Horrible! by Wingfield · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't agree with this at all! How many of these kids who may have grown up to enjoy classical music are turned off by it forever? How many children will avoid their school music programs now, which have positive effects on everything from social development to grades? This makes me so angry.

    1. Re:Horrible! by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think kids don't enjoy classical music because most of their music experience are from listening to CD records. And recorded music is just a BAD thing to listen to. To make things worse, today's sound engineers produce highly post-processed recordings that hides the "imperfections" but also removes the little things that makes the music alive.

      Your home theatre/ipod/whatever never beat a live performance in a real music hall.

      And now this. Classical music eardrum piercer. Guess this is yet another form of government bailing-out for the recording industry[sic].

      /me posting this listening to Beethoven's Grosse Fuge op.133 ;p.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    2. Re:Horrible! by Capsaicin · · Score: 3, Funny

      [R]ecorded music is just a BAD thing to listen to ... /me posting this listening to Beethoven's Grosse Fuge op.133

      You're posting during a live performance? Have some respect dude. ;)

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Horrible! by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Nope ;p I just can't get the mood of spitting into the Slashdot firehose without listening to some extremely ill-recorded music ;)

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    4. Re:Horrible! by vxice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      how exactly would they be turned off of it by hearing it while loitering. Presumably they already don't like it since it appears that it drives them away, and without the music they still loiter etc. Now if the music was played before cops came and beat them up to remove them then they disliked the music you would have pavlovian condition yes. But in this case the music already elicits a negative response itself. one might ask what awful state our youth are in that the classics repel them but remember the classics are the pieces of art that you like to say you like and don't necessarily honestly like.

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    5. Re:Horrible! by martas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      human audition, like all perception, is a system that computes a lossy representation of raw stimuli it is presented with. this representation is highly lossy, and while the degree to which it is [in]sensitive to various aspects of the original stimulus varies highly from person to person, certain aspects of this lossiness are almost for very large portions of the population. thus, it is possible to conduct a study measuring the degree to which the difference between on original and reproduced stimulus created by a specific external coding/reproducing mechanism can be perceived by a certain portion of the population. in this case, one could conduct a double-blind study asking individuals to identify the immediate source of a musical piece. if a significant portion of test subjects perform better than random, and also report that, for example, music from an mp3 file played through a computer with a decent sound card is less pleasant for them than a live performance, then your (rather unscientific) claim about losing "the little things that make music alive" would be confirmed. i am not aware of any studies of this nature, and a brief internet search didn't turn up any relevant results. i have heard opinions such as yours before, however, based on my intuition (any nothing more), here's my personal opinion on the matter:
      1) the quality difference between an average bitrate mp3, CD quality, and live performance is perceptible for at least some portion of the population, likely a significant one.
      2) the average person who listens to music would consider this quality sacrifice negligible. i.e., given the practical impossibility of listening to live performance while driving, studying, working, running, playing, dining, dancing, et cetera, normal encoding of music is "good enough".
      3) all human perception is relative in nature. this statement may not be precise (you can't get used to 500F weather), but it is often correct. in this case, i believe that after a period of adjustment, even the most highly trained musical ear can be re-trained to be able to enjoy and appreciate lower-quality musical recordings just as much as it would enjoy perfect reproduction of the music.

    6. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't worry, he's posting by speaking silently into the phone. Now it's only a matter of time before he wreck a nation.

    7. Re:Horrible! by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      This got nothing to do with sound quality. Can you find a small, interesting error made by a musician in a post-processed CD? No. What about the smile of the face of the guy next to you?

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    8. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      School music programs? You must be American. In GB, compulsory school music went the way of the dodo some time back in the state sector.

      Oh, yeah, and read the summary. It's not the middle-class violin students hanging about bus stops with spray cans.

    9. Re:Horrible! by Korin43 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've got to think farther into the future. The next generation of British people is going to hate classical music. What happens when they have kids? An entire generation of teenagers obsessed with classical music. Just imagine the lulz.

    10. Re:Horrible! by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You either like music or you don't, I REALLY REALLY doubt playing classical music is going to change the opinions of ANYONE. Did elevator music turn anyone off of being a musician? Come on man.

    11. Re:Horrible! by gaelfx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, 'cause our opinions from our childhood never change. I still think girls are icky and vegetables are my parent's conspiracy to keep me down. Lemme know next time you come to a wild, baseless conclusion.

    12. Re:Horrible! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Horrible!

      I agree, but with so many other options exhausted, it may well be the least barbaric way of punishing these little shits.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    13. Re:Horrible! by hcpxvi · · Score: 1

      That may be true in some parts of the UK. There seems to be plenty of compulsory music and freely-provided optional music in the schools here in East Lothian, Scotland.

    14. Re:Horrible! by Alarindris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to worry, churches have been doing it to them as well for quite some time. Trying to introduce my friends to classical music, they ALWAYS say "Aw man, why are we listening to church music?" What's even funnier is that it's only the religious ones who say that.

    15. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guilty as charged. For GB read England. I forgot you guys north of the Solway Firth actually have a top-notch education system whose playing fields haven't all been sold off to the private sector.

    16. Re:Horrible! by Sique · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was a study done by the german computer magazine c't some years ago.
      Result: While all participants were music semiprofessionals, their rate of correct attribution to the right source was only slightly above random chance, with the best one being someone with impaired hearing and thus a different reception than a normal person, who was pretty good in spotting the MP3. With higher bitrates for MP3, they even got worse than random chance.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    17. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *advertisement warning*

      A while back I found an interesting album called "The Most Relaxing Classical Music in the Universe". There are two CDs which contain many well-known classical tracks. The thing I liked about it a lot is that they left in all the small imperfections and radom sounds of musicians doing something noisy, they recorded the tracks using stereo mikes in a room with instruments placed around the mike, so you get the feeling you're sitting in the middle of the performance (if you have headphones), and they didn't overly compress it, meaning that quiet and loud parts sound natural.

      So if you want to have something to compare to, try this. I think the major difference is that a recording like this is closest to a live performance. You can almost see the instruments and you can easily focus your attention on any one of them. This is subjective, but to me it made a big difference.

    18. Re:Horrible! by martas · · Score: 1

      yes, i believe it's that study that i had in mind, though unfortunately i don't speak german, and am not able to find it on their website.

      one note: in the case of a binary choice, worse than random can be turned into better than random with a trivial transformation... :] though i doubt that the margins were outside the range of statistical insignificance.

    19. Re:Horrible! by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How many of these kids who may have grown up to enjoy classical music are turned off by it forever?"

      Who cares about what chavs enjoy? Repel them and be done with it. Such folks don't change, at least for the better.
      Those who are worthy to appreciate good music will self-select without assistance.

      I like classical, and would take advantage of going where it repels those who do not.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    20. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of these kids who may have grown up to enjoy classical music are turned off by it forever?

      None. This is aimed at chavs.

    21. Re:Horrible! by bytesex · · Score: 1

      Or you like, yet you say you don't like, because it's just the only way to look cool to your pimple-faced, nary a shave needing, sexually frustrated, badly dressed, stinking, fourteen year old comrades.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    22. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you have a point, but without capitals and paragraphs I didn't bother to take the time find out.

    23. Re:Horrible! by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "How many of these kids who may have grown up to enjoy classical music are turned off by it forever?"

      Zero.

      Actually not a single one of the chavs generally entertained by loitering, vandalism, and graffiti would ever have become your postulated classical aficionado, so we're good there.

      --
      -Styopa
    24. Re:Horrible! by tg123 · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with this at all! How many of these kids who may have grown up to enjoy classical music are turned off by it forever? How many children will avoid their school music programs now, which have positive effects on everything from social development to grades?
      This makes me so angry.

      I find your comment strange.

      Do you not see that this has always been happening?

      The only children who learn to appreciate classical music are the "well to do" rich kids who have access to good music teachers.

      The so called positive affects have less to do with the music and more do to with these children being "advantaged".

      Tell me how many children do you know from poor areas go on to study classical music after leaving school?

    25. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh... yes it will. Preferences can easily be changed by familiarity, and also by association. Plus you're acting as if a person either likes _all_ music or _none_. This is clearly false.

      The way it is used now, this system will induce a simple pavlovian response for a lot of people when presented with classical music. Don't think that this doesn't work to some extent for humans just because we have higher faculties than animals.
      Another example might be, that anyone learning to play an instrument and using a certain type of music as training material, will come to appreciate that type mroe, simply by familiarity.

    26. Re:Horrible! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Dude - 90% of these posters are American. They wouldn't know a chav if one hit them over a head with their goldie lookin chain.

      Seriously though, your post eeks out a bit of the classism that people argue underlies the chav stereotype. Here in New York we have our guidos, but they mostly do us the favor of localizing themselves to Long Island and Jersey, so we can simply be regionalist and simply call them the "bridge and tunnel crowd".

    27. Re:Horrible! by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Kids in general hate classical music.

      As they don't have the listening skills yet to enjoy it.

      Non-Orchestral music which is popular today is rather light in texture. Vocal, Guitar(s), Bass, Drums vs. a full orchestra Violins, Violas, Cellos, Contrabass (for a string orchestra popular during the classical period) expenanded to Trumpits, Tubas, French Hones, Trombones, Flues, Oboes, Clarinetist, Timpani, and a variety of percussion having a much layered and complex set of works.

      The "Rock Band" Layout was based on the Minimalistic Movement of having just enough to do what you need. In many ways making music easier to listen to as there isn't much going on and you can focus on the lyrics, orchestral layout focuses on the music and you can have really stupid lyrics and the song will still be good.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    28. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with this at all! How many of these kids who may have grown up to enjoy classical music are turned off by it forever?

      Finally, a good use for Disco!

    29. Re:Horrible! by moose_hp · · Score: 1

      No, but it discourages me to use the elevator.

      --
      DON'T PANIC.
    30. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not about opinions, is about linking certain type of things to punishment. If your parents used to do a particular thing to ground you, you'd remember that as a bad experience. The human mind is highly associative.

      Since I'm assuming your parents didn't thought not eating vegetables was such a big thing, and they knew you'd be free to like (or not) girls, they probably didn't force it or associate it to anything.
      Your culture and your surroundings leave deep marks.

    31. Re:Horrible! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Who cares about what chavs enjoy? Repel them and be done with it. Such folks don't change, at least for the better.

      And here, ladies and gentleman, we see the classist attitude that allows Britain to be such a haven for despotic and anti-democratic behavior. When it's known that lower class people "don't change, at least for the better", all that's to be done is to "[r]epel them and be done with it". Never mind what they as individual human beings have done, or could be capable of accomplishing; it's quite sufficient to judge them by their class.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    32. Re:Horrible! by neurovish · · Score: 1

      Dude - 90% of these posters are American. They wouldn't know a chav if one hit them over a head with their goldie lookin chain.

      Seriously though, your post eeks out a bit of the classism that people argue underlies the chav stereotype. Here in New York we have our guidos, but they mostly do us the favor of localizing themselves to Long Island and Jersey, so we can simply be regionalist and simply call them the "bridge and tunnel crowd".

      So...chavs are British guidos?

    33. Re:Horrible! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I like classical music. I have for as long as I can remember. My younger sister never did like it as a child and still doesn't today. My parents were never "rich". I think your analysis into what causes kids to like classical music may require some refinement.

    34. Re:Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about what chavs enjoy? Repel them and be done with it. Such folks don't change, at least for the better.

      And here, ladies and gentleman, we see the classist attitude that allows Britain to be such a haven for despotic and anti-democratic behavior. When it's known that lower class people "don't change, at least for the better", all that's to be done is to "[r]epel them and be done with it". Never mind what they as individual human beings have done, or could be capable of accomplishing; it's quite sufficient to judge them by their class.

      If you think this attitude is unique to the British you are sadly mistaken. I've heard as much from various people, both members of the general public and ideologues of various political stripes, many times in the good 'ol US of A."

    35. Re:Horrible! by Sique · · Score: 1

      Here is a translation: click

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    36. Re:Horrible! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I got it all backwards.

      When I was a kid/teen, I didn't like rock, other than some of the softer stuff. I preferred classical, mainly heavy pieces like Beethoven symphonies, but I played it REALLY LOUD.

      I've been known to contend that punk is structually descended from classical, not from rock... and now that I'm middle-aged, I mostly listen to darkwave and industrial (much of which has heavy texturing akin to Beethoven). So I guess I still have the same taste, just tuned to a different set of performers. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    37. Re:Horrible! by serbanp · · Score: 1

      /me posting this listening to Beethoven's Grosse Fuge op.133 ;p.

      His late string quartets are some of the best background music pieces for creative thinking.

    38. Re:Horrible! by charlesj68 · · Score: 1

      With everyone yelling about obesity these days, maybe that's a win.

    39. Re:Horrible! by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      A risk of death is a deterrent to taking up any job, and elevator music gave people motive to want to strangle the associated musicians. I'd say yes, some people were turned away due to the dangerous lifestyle elevator music created.

    40. Re:Horrible! by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      orchestral layout focuses on the music and you can have really stupid lyrics and the song will still be good

      I'm sorry, opera just doesn't work for me.

    41. Re:Horrible! by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      I never liked classical music for the first 32 years of my life. Then suddenly, for no apparent reason, started liking it. (I'm also not rich.)

      It's always been 'around me' in one way or another, and it never rubbed off before at all --- my dad loved it and it was always playing in the house since I can remember, several of my girlfriends happened to like classic music, even flatmates I've roomed with happened to like classical music. Had no effect on me. Then one day I just found myself bored with all the worn-out music I listened to up until my 20s, and all the new music coming out mostly just sounds like rehashed derivative trashy nihilist crap to me ... so I thought I'd try out some classical, and voila, suddenly it clicked with me.

      Maybe it's just growing up.

    42. Re:Horrible! by tg123 · · Score: 1

      I like classical music. I have for as long as I can remember. My younger sister never did like it as a child and still doesn't today. My parents were never "rich". I think your analysis into what causes kids to like classical music may require some refinement.

      Well this is very good to hear.
      Exception that proves the rule I suppose.

      Now tell me do you play a classical instrument?

      I will also qualify what I said that by saying when I said rich kids I meant middle class and upwards.
      These children tend to have access to the teachers and resources that learning classical music requires.

        It is very rare for me to met someone from a poor up bringing who study's classical music.

    43. Re:Horrible! by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Punk is not structurally descended from Classical music. Most classical works will use more than three chords and have much more complicated forms than the verse/chorus. Punk rock is designed to shock and be in your face, but the only classical music style which is designed to shock is expressionism - which isn't in most people's playlists.

      Punk is a simplification of regular rock, played faster and louder.

    44. Re:Horrible! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, punk is much more complex than that. Some of it is shock-rock, but some is actually quite "soft-spoken", and it's more a theme (which is fundamentally "do your own thing the best you're able, even if your best sucks" which is why even crappy voices can do well at it) than a style. -- It is more likely to have a structure that builds on itself than were other rock forms, and which expects more than just passive listening, and that's what I'm talking about that makes it more akin to classical than to mainstream rock. -- I think this is why out of all the rock subgenres that have come and gone over the decades, punk has had the most endurance.

      Your ears and perceptions may vary. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    45. Re:Horrible! by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Note that I said I *LIKE* classical music, not that I study or ever have studied it. I liked it even as a kid (my mother has suggested that it's because she listened to a lot of classical music while she was pregnant with me, although I really do not know if that could actually be a contributing factor). My sister, however, finds classical, and in fact most orchestral and symphony music in general to be "boring", and has always felt that way. We were both raised in the same household with access to pretty much the same things. There was never any real pressure that I can recall on either of us to be obligated to like that sort of music, so I do not think her feelings stemmed from some sort of youthful rebellious attitude either. She just doesn't like it.

    46. Re:Horrible! by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1
      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    47. Re:Horrible! by Teun · · Score: 1
      Maybe I miss a whoosh :)

      But the majority of youth affected isn't per se hating the classical music played, it's the peer pressure that makes them leave these sites.

      And as such it's a benign tool.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    48. Re:Horrible! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Welling being on a board of Geeks there are often exceptions... In many ways Nerds and Geeks while they were kids listen to Classical Music as a way to stick it to the other kids, a way of saying SEE HOW MUCH CULTURED AND BETTER THEN YOU I AM! Sure you may enjoyed other pieces however your pride stopped you from enjoying other forms that may have been more popular, and dismissed as you got older you learned to appreciate the other forms as well.

      There isn't anything wrong with todays music. Or even music of the minimalist period. However kids do not has as much of trained ear as they were adults.

      Sure blasting Beethoven is fine, But you need a good ear to listen and find the jokes in a Bach piece

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    49. Re:Horrible! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Had nothing to do with false pride. Not even with exposure or teaching (tho we still had structured music classes as part of the required curiculum back then). But I do have a tested-perfect ear, and that may be part of it... bluntly, until electronics made it possible for anyone to play in tune, a lot of pop/rock was pretty marginal or even outright badly played.

      But mostly, I just think it's amusing that my musical tastes timeline is bassackwards from most people.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  10. romanes eunt domus by Ekhymosis · · Score: 4, Funny

    graffiti was written in special glow in the dark compounds all over london tubes in klingon, ancient greek, hieroglyphics and linear-b soon after.

    --
    Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
    1. Re:romanes eunt domus by novium · · Score: 1

      Linear B is Ancient Greek. /end random pedantry. But Linear A would be cool.

    2. Re:romanes eunt domus by julesh · · Score: 1

      Linear B is Ancient Greek. /end random pedantry

      Linear B is Mycenean Greek, an older language than Ancient Greek. The differences are small, but they are usually considered separate languages.

      You appear to have missed punctuation in your close tag.

      \end{random pedantry}

    3. Re:romanes eunt domus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for that, my crew is going to tag your lorry in Linear A!

    4. Re:romanes eunt domus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, snap!

      NERD FIGHT!

    5. Re:romanes eunt domus by Hazelfield · · Score: 1

      And the people bowed and prayed to the neon god they made.

    6. Re:romanes eunt domus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the people bowed and prayed to the neon god they made.

      A slight digression, but Simon & Garfunkel songs would probably have the same effect as classical music. Even though a higher proportion of current teenagers might like listening to it in private than classical or light jazz (just an educated guess on my part), it still is far to unlike the music currently designated "cool and hip" for most of these teens to risk being associated with in public. Oh and just to be clear, I'm not making any judgments about how "kids today" are somehow far worse than previous generations, I'm just noting that for a lot of them behavior is governed by peer-pressure and the need to fit-in. This fundamental social dynamic isn't different from previous generations, even though the forms of expression do tend to differ between generations.

    7. Re:romanes eunt domus by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Linear B is Ancient Greek. /end random pedantry

      Linear B is Mycenean Greek, an older language than Ancient Greek.

      FINISH HIM!!

      The differences are small, but they are usually considered separate languages.

      Pedantality! julesh wins!!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    8. Re:romanes eunt domus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "Romani eunt domum."

    9. Re:romanes eunt domus by Ekhymosis · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "I missed the joke..."

      --
      Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
  11. They'll grow to like it and... by noz · · Score: 3, Funny

    A new renaissance will be born!

    1. Re:They'll grow to like it and... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      One can only hope...

    2. Re:They'll grow to like it and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have heard of an afterbirth being born. even babies!
      but a rebirth being born?

  12. Ask the Artists by dcollins · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One might ask what the artists would think of this usage?

    Fortunately, we have a pretty similar situation with more current music being used a torture device against Guantanamo detainess, and the rock musicians who protested against that usage:

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,672177,00.html

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Ask the Artists by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fortunately, we have a pretty similar situation with more current music being used a torture device against Guantanamo detainess,

      Oh, yes, thank God we are torturing other people so that we might learn how people feel about their music being used to torture.

      Now, if we could only create a robotic toenail remover that was controlled entirely by emacs extensions, so we could get Richard Stallman's opinion on software freedom vs physical liberties and human rights.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:Ask the Artists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty obvious that he means "I have taught at both union and non-union schools and in my experience the unions are better for students and teachers.". That is, gp IS a primary source, and asking him for a citation means you're a retard (with an agenda, no doubt).

      It's a lot like saying [citation needed] when someone says "I've eaten many pies and I like apple pie best!". It just makes you look stupid and ignorant.

    3. Re:Ask the Artists by Sique · · Score: 1

      As long as the toenail.el is published under the GPL we are fine here.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:Ask the Artists by tool462 · · Score: 1

      I think he would favor liberating the toenails from their otherwise dank and oppressive confinement.

  13. Blame Einstein then by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Though he did it in reverse, musicalising weapon...THE weapon, if there ever was one.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  14. Just wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Someday soon, we'll be blasting death metal in nursing homes...

    1. Re:Just wait... by gomiam · · Score: 3, Funny

      blasting death metal

      You mean shrapnel, right? Or perhaps that would be "blasting metal death"...

  15. Of course by gzipped_tar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Children perform the bad behaviors because of file sharing and disrespect of copyright. Playing music in the public for free only gets things worse.

    Will someone please think of the children?

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    1. Re:Of course by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Playing music in the public for free only gets things worse."

      Why do you think they tried classical music in the first place?
      Playing contemporary music costs more than removing the graffiti.

    2. Re:Of course by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      ...disrespect of copyright. Playing music in the public for free only gets things worse.

      But it's not for free. The authorities using this music pay for public performance licenses. Copyright is being respected, you can breathe easily.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Of course by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strange. We're thinking of the children when we strip away the freedoms of the adults, and appearantly we're thinking of the adults when we're stripping away the freedoms of our kids. In other words, when we're taking away from everyone, we make everyone happy... or something like that must be the logic.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needed, too. Classical music is still copyrighted - even though the score is long-expired, the act of performing the work counts as a new copyright. And at a copyright term of 95 years in the US, any music that *isn't* copyrighted will have the quality of a wax cylinder recording.

      The EU copyright situation is a little more complicated - it can be as low as fifty years - but thanks to the situation with international treaties, a US copyright can also under some circumstances be enforced there even if it's expired under the shorter term.

    5. Re:Of course by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      any music that *isn't* copyrighted will have the quality of a wax cylinder recording.

      I think for scaring people away, that might be just the right quality :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Of course by icebraining · · Score: 1

      How long 'till our kids listen to that 150 times a night?

      "Everybody's happy now"

    7. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The authorities using this music pay for public performance licenses.

      Fat fucking chance.

    8. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that even if the copyright on the composition is dead, the copyright on the recording almost certainly isn't? Those conductors and players have to be paid for the work they did 20, 30, 40 years ago after all. So they still have the same legal problems.

      That said, I'd rather just put on my MP3 player and listen to Mozart that way. My in-ear headphones are probably way better than whatever speakers their using, and I can't scrobble it if I listen to theirs.

    9. Re:Of course by Kopachris · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's a lot of good, free classical music out there. I have several symphonies, sonatas, and concertos from classiccat.com that are pretty good quality.

    10. Re:Of course by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but with classical music, it can be pretty difficult to identify exactly what recording it is (i.e., which orchestra played it, and when). After all, how many recorded renditions of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony are there? How are you going to tell from a publicly-played recording which one it is and if it was properly paid for? After all, maybe it was a public performance and the rights were released into the public domain. You'd probably have to do a fair bit of research to find all this out.

      It's a little different than playing "Enter Sandman" (mentioned in another /. article today). Anyone remotely familiar with Metallica can identify the song and the album it came from, and can tell you if it's a live version or the (single) studio recording. And you can be quite certain Metallica never released any of their songs into the public domain.

    11. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the RIAA? or is that RIAUK?

  16. It'll stop in a few years by AuraSeer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Youths" don't stay young forever. Before very long they'll be adults, with legitimate reasons to be at stores and train stations and bus stops, but they still won't like the music. Any place that continues to play it will be driving away a whole lot of customers.

    1. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Onthax · · Score: 1

      Easy there, that makes sense and this is the government we are talking about

    2. Re:It'll stop in a few years by AuraSeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Easy there, that makes sense and this is the government we are talking about

      Oh, if we're talking about the UK government, that's even easier. Just mention to a local official that the music contains lots of "sharp" notes. They'll spring into nanny mode, and require that all the speakers be entombed in Nerf so that nobody cuts themselves.

    3. Re:It'll stop in a few years by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Teenagers don't have legitimate reasons to be at stores and train stations and bus stops?

      I can't figure out why kids would prefer to hang out at some bus stop or a train station when they could be hanging out somewhere cooler.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:It'll stop in a few years by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Youths" don't stay young forever. Before very long they'll be adults, with legitimate reasons to be at stores and train stations and bus stops, but they still won't like the music. Any place that continues to play it will be driving away a whole lot of customers.

      You are basically saying today's youths are so much different than youths a century ago. Possibly, taking into consideration that intelligence increases over generations, their intellect is more advanced and their reasoning for disliking classical music is taken with a great deal of consideration.

      I'll give you that I represent your words very freely indeed. But consider that Bach and Mozart are among the most skilled musicians that ever lived and that their works have stood against the tooth of time. I would not be surprised when a percentage of the "recalcitrant youths" will start liking and maybe appreciating classical pieces.

      My take is that the dislike of classical music is fed by group pressure, possibly to stand up against one's parents. And, as less and less parents show an exclusive liking of classical music, it will become less and less "uncool" to listen to it.

      I recall Jaco Patorius, possibly the most virtuoso and influential bass guitar player that ever lived, saying he liked any kind of music as long as it's played well. He even liked country and western.

      Now, let me find my ropes, straitjacket, eye clamps, artificial tears and the almost forgotten long play records of Ludwig Von. Then I'll invite a "youth" over and "we" will have a swell time appreciating classical music.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    5. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0, Troll

      Bach was a good composer. Mozart is umitigated shit. Why it remains so popular, I have no idea - in its day his music was just mass-produced commercial crap similar to Stock, Aitken and Waterman "Hit Factory" releases.

    6. Re:It'll stop in a few years by quantaman · · Score: 1

      "Youths" don't stay young forever. Before very long they'll be adults, with legitimate reasons to be at stores and train stations and bus stops, but they still won't like the music. Any place that continues to play it will be driving away a whole lot of customers.

      Just pick a new genre every 5-10 years :)

      However I'm guessing that it's only the repeat troublemakers who would actually hear enough Mozart to develop an aversion.

      And those repeat troublemakers probably end up forming most of the adult troublemakers too. Those stores and train stations may find it advantageous to keep the music blaring when they grow up (noting they'll lose the business of a few good adults who were troublemakers as kids).

      Note I think the article is also a lot of hype. I doubt there's many students developing a pathological fear of Mozart, though they may be learning to associate it with discipline and authority which could make them uncomfortable. However I think the best explanation of the youth deterrent came from the article "It's pretty uncool to be seen hanging around somewhere when Mozart is playing."

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Oh god, the voice of reason. Finally someone sharing my hate of Mozart! Thank you, Sir, I shall cling on to the last shreds of my belief in humanity for a bit longer. That aside, you stated yourself why Mozart remains popular - it is crappy pop, simple as that. (Except for the requiem, maybe.)

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    8. Re:It'll stop in a few years by martas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      good point, and frankly there's something about the uk that is very baffling to me: they seem to be a very anti-youth and anti-child society. can anyone explain to me why they seem to hate their new generation so much??

    9. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall Jaco Patorius, possibly the most virtuoso and influential bass guitar player that ever lived, saying he liked any kind of music as long as it's played well.

      Yeah. "Played well" over some "as cheap as possible" loudspeakers at the bus stop?? That would turn me away, because I still have damn good hearing, mostly due to not listening to music over shitty headphones/speakers at too high volume. If someone tries that around here, I will most certainly not shop there ever again.

    10. Re:It'll stop in a few years by nOw2 · · Score: 0

      The type of "youths" this is targeting are those most likely to be the ones who waste the rest of their lives. Therefore it is unlikely any shops will suffer.

    11. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are basically saying today's youths are so much different than youths a century ago. Possibly, taking into consideration that intelligence increases over generations, their intellect is more advanced and their reasoning for disliking classical music is taken with a great deal of consideration.

      Really? I thought he was saying the opposite (that youth now are the same as always, and like the animals they are - they learn to fear that which is associated with pain even if it doesn't directly cause it).

      Negative stimulus = negative response. This is essentially torture like you'd find in Gitmo, I'm sure that anyone who lives to get out of that place will be filled with an irrational fear and hatred of the music used to deprive them of sleep.

    12. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      because haning out somewhere "cooler" usually costs money

    13. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit harsh. Mozart doesn't hold a candle to Beethoveen, Brahms and Bach but somes of his compositions are enjoyable (adagio of concerto 23 for one).

    14. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, let me find my ropes, straitjacket, eye clamps, artificial tears and the almost forgotten long play records of Ludwig Von. Then I'll invite a "youth" over and "we" will have a swell time appreciating classical music.

      In the end, I think it has less to do with the kind of music as with the fact that you're deprived of any control over what music is played or how (or how long) it is played.

      I like Gregorian chant, but I'd happily crucify any son of a bitch who sat outside my house all night long playing my own Hildegarde of Bingen CD on a loud car system.

      Hah! -- captcha = handgun

    15. Re:It'll stop in a few years by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Can anyone explain to me why they seem to hate their new generation so much??

      Because they're the ones causing all the trouble! Going round stabbing old ladies, each other, dealing drugs, raping people, being antisocial.

      At least, that's the impression you get if you read certain major newspapers.

      Examples
      more

      It's yet another class issue in Britain, as you can see from some other comments (e.g. nOw2 below, "the type of "youths"" -- he means the class).

    16. Re:It'll stop in a few years by nOw2 · · Score: 1

      Spot on. E.g. the ones causing the trouble can be identified merely by the clothing they wear. Not to say that everyone still wearing white track/shellsuits in 2010 is going to cause trouble, but empirical evidence suggests a strong correlation.

      The continued stratification of housing areas into social groups provides similar indicators.

      Gated communities are not far away now. I'd live in one.

    17. Re:It'll stop in a few years by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Possibly the customers they don't want. Young chavs will become old chavs, and no more desirable as clientele.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    18. Re:It'll stop in a few years by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The stupid thing is I think the kids causing trouble are just plain bored.

      Bored middle class kids mope around at home (or at a friend's house).

      Bored lower class kids mope around outside, and occasionally cause trouble, but mostly are just perceived to be a source of trouble.

      Unfortunately, I have no idea where to start to solve class division in Britain, and I don't think anyone else does.

    19. Re:It'll stop in a few years by JCZwart · · Score: 1

      in its day his music was just mass-produced commercial crap

      Well, you are right in that his music was commercial. Mozart didn't have the luxury to be an independent artist, so he had to somewhat tone down his artisticity so people would actually buy it/come listen to it. The way he was still able to put artisticity into his music, which was very subtle so as not to offend his listeners like someone as Beethoven did, is what makes him stand out from the 'crowd' (of which we still know who? That's right, apart from guys like Mozart, Gluck and Hummel, composers from that day and age are mostly forgotten nowadays).

      By the way, Bach received criticism in his day for expressing his artisticity like he did (which fortunately didn't stop him from writing what he wrote). Also, a lot of his works could easily be called commercial as well. After all, these composers all wrote because they had to make a living, not solely because they had the desire to express themselves artistically. But because Bachs polyphony is so advanced, his music absolutely doesn't sound like it's overly commercial. At the time of Mozart, musical language had already shifted to something much more 'easy listening'-like, which I guess is the reason for you to call it 'commercial crap'.

    20. Re:It'll stop in a few years by JCZwart · · Score: 1

      My reply to GP's post might interest you as well. ;-)

    21. Re:It'll stop in a few years by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 0

      If anything, Mozart appealed to his lustful public. Dancing a waltz can be pretty arousing. Hell, when danced well, even at today's standards.

      Completely discarding Mozart for composing "popular" music is just as easy as discarding classical music* altogether. For simplicity's sake, maybe Mozart should be compared to modern composers with a distinct oeuvre, whose music is very danceable and will pass the test of time. The likes of Nile Rodgers & Bernard Edwards, Duke Ellington or Stevie Wonder for instance.

      And that doesn't imply we all should want to be confronted with their music. Then again, refraining from negative comment is usually the graceful option.

      Possibly a cure against disliking Mozart is perhaps taking waltz classes and -once proficient at it- visiting Vienna during Christmas and new year.

      *I'm using the term classical music very freely here. Strictly speaking Mozart lived and composed in the classical period and Bach for instance in the Baroque.

      PS: In retrospect I realise I'm writing this for a /. audience. I don't know what came over me and I apologise.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    22. Re:It'll stop in a few years by sadtrev · · Score: 1
      The good bits of "Mozart's Requiem" were written by one of his students after he died in order to help pay his debts.

      The only other half-decent stuff attributed to him are the 40th Symphony and the Magic Flute overture, also written in the three months whilst he was kicking the bucket. Makes me suspect that somebody else wrote them for him as well.

    23. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that calling it simply "crap" might have been a bit too harsh. I am aware of the socioeconomic constraints composers had to work with. It is just that I do not care much for Mozart's music. What occasionally fuels my nerdrage is the fact that in every discussion remotely touching the subject of classical music, Mozart gets presented as prime example of the genius composer, as a yardstick with which to measure musical quality. And that is simply not true. In my opinion, much of Mozart's music already exhibits that special kind of, for lack of a better word, "austrian shallowness", which culminates in the Viennese operetta.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    24. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I would love to come up with some insightful, scathing comment, but as per usual, the slashdot captcha magic-8-balls-up the reason for me: employer.

      In the UK, we aren't anti-youth, it's just that our class divisions are manifested differently to other countries' class divisions. When people appear to be anti-youth, they are really being anti-poor people. They victimise the youth of poor people because they are the least likely to fight back.

      And who do these divisions benefit? The ones sitting on the capital, of course (who probably have a kid with a mod point they are itching to use on a dissenting AC).

    25. Re:It'll stop in a few years by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      He was deaf. Cut the guy some slack.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    26. Re:It'll stop in a few years by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Don't tell them the music contains many "low" notes either, or they'll have the speakers placed higher...

    27. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never understood what makes music "bad" or "good". Can someone explain some objective criteria that can be inferred from merely listening to the music?

    28. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      There were several marketing studies in the US that showed that stores that played classical music had higher sales than others. First, they determined that playing music at low volume increased sales over silence (people were more willing to casually browse until they found something to buy). Second, they determined that playing classical music had the greatest impact on sales. The theory was (possibly confirmed by further studies, but I don't know) that few people find classical music offensive (even if they don't care for it).
      I suspect that playing classical music reduces crime for similar reasons that keeping an area clean (clean up the litter, tow away abandoned cars, etc) and in good repair does, it makes the atmosphere of the area/location into one where a person who has nefarious goals feel out of place (actually, there is no solid explanation for why it works, but it has been shown repeatedly that keeping an area clean and in good repair reduces crime).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    29. Re:It'll stop in a few years by loxosceles · · Score: 1

      Beethoven went deaf. Mozart could hear fine.

    30. Re:It'll stop in a few years by loxosceles · · Score: 1

      I find most music by Mozart, Haydn, and Vivaldi nauseating.
      [/ex-violin-player, with more than passing familiarity with most "standard" classical composers]

    31. Re:It'll stop in a few years by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Pfff! The guy had no excuse!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    32. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bach is simply epic.

    33. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Driving away youths NOW is costing them money... most teenagers have a lot more disposable income than adults. Businesses doing this is a self-correcting problem; most of them should go out of business. Unfortunately the government can keep doing this forever, at least until someone files a lawsuit for violation of the equal protection clause of the constitution (what's the UK equivalent of this?)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    34. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      ...or Stevie Wonder for instance

      Stevie Wonder is an interesting example. Is that Stevie Wonder pre-Synclavier, or Stevie Wonder post-Synclavier? Because with the former you've got belting tunes like Superstition, Higher Ground and Living For The City, and in the latter you have the dull, mechanical I Just Called To Say I Love You.

    35. Re:It'll stop in a few years by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      they seem to be a very anti-youth and anti-child society. can anyone explain to me why they seem to hate their new generation so much??

      Because the Brits are incredibly, overbearingly and obnoxiously STUFFY.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    36. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      I think you're getting Mozart confused with Strauss? Strauss is responsible for the waltzes. Menuets were the dance of the day for Mozart.

    37. Re:It'll stop in a few years by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      You and some of the other posters will enjoy this article. Critics and artists slam works that they 'should' like. http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/specials/article6964184.ece

    38. Re:It'll stop in a few years by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      I think you're getting Mozart confused with Strauss? Strauss is responsible for the waltzes. Menuets were the dance of the day for Mozart.

      You're absolutely right. Where's a corner for me to hide?

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  17. So? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 3, Funny

    Most adults I know can't stand classical music either, so I doubt this will have a long term effect on listening habits; who knows, being exposed to it might actually get more kids interested in it. And as someone in their late 30's who can still hear frequencies up to 20kHz I'd much rather this than those buzz generators, as long as the sound quality isn't too bad and they don't play too much Satie (I don't want to fall asleep and miss my bus).

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    1. Re:So? by Capsaicin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most adults I know can't stand classical music either.

      I would hazard a guess and say that the people who dreamt up this scheme don't either. I do wonder why this is news though, this idea was tried out at least a decade ago.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    2. Re:So? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      I would hazard a guess and say that the people who dreamt up this scheme don't either.

      You don't have to dislike a type of music to observe the effects. For example, I like prog rock, but I also know that if I want to clear a room the best choice is The Devil's Triangle from King Crimson's In The Wake Of Poseidon...hell, I can't listen to it...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:So? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      It is a basic fact of psychology that pairing something with a punishment (assuming that something isn't desirable enough to override the punishment's effect) will likely condition the subject to associate that something with punishment or otherwise dislike it. It's basic classical conditioning--do something wrong, get an electrical shock, the subject is less likely to repeat that behavior. Naturally, though, context may modify the effect of the conditioning...

      Make kids sit around in boredom (they'd much rather be somewhere else) against their will piping classical music at them will possibly just give them to associate classical music with... uh, negative things.

    4. Re:So? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Make kids sit around in boredom (they'd much rather be somewhere else) against their will piping classical music at them will possibly just give them to associate classical music with... uh, negative things.

      Making kids sit around in boredom against their will teaching them maths or science will just give them reason to associate maths and science with negative things. Like classical music, maths and science aren't considered cool... all this proves is that some kids have the wits to reject cultural imperatives to follow their own interests, the rest don't. No great revelation to Slashdotters there.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  18. This tactic is being used against adults also. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where I live there is a notorious corner for crack cocain, prostitution, bloody fights, and anything you can imagine.

    Despite constant city owned surveillance equipment the activity continues.

    The local Diner installed speakers and pipes out jazz, classical, etc. I find it to be kind of nice mood music, for an elevator.

      It has cut down on the drug dealers, kids hanging out, street performers, and the homeless who are normally sitting on the sidewalk asking for change. Apparently the softly played music is enough of an annoyance that they go away.

    Miles Davis - 1
    Bach - 1
    Panoptic sort - 0

    1. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live there is a notorious corner for crack cocain, prostitution, bloody fights, and anything you can imagine.

      Really, do all of your stories have to begin this way?

    2. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by Rennt · · Score: 1

      It has cut down on the drug dealers, kids hanging out, street performers, and the homeless

      That's an odd group of people to lump in together. It is almost as if they want to cut down on the community itself.

      Seriously, I can see dealers being undesirable, but street performers?

    3. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by deimtee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some of them are mimes.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    4. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That diner is as good as bankrupt already. Once the RIAA finds out it is giving a "public performance" of copyrighted works without paying some ridiculous royalty, they're toast. The drug dealers are no threat compared to THAT.

    5. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should play the Barney theme over and over :-)

    6. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by josquin9 · · Score: 1

      Where I live there is a notorious corner for crack cocain, prostitution, bloody fights, and anything you can imagine.

      Despite constant city owned surveillance equipment the activity continues.

      The local Diner installed speakers and pipes out jazz, classical, etc. I find it to be kind of nice mood music, for an elevator.

        It has cut down on the drug dealers, kids hanging out, street performers, and the homeless who are normally sitting on the sidewalk asking for change. Apparently the softly played music is enough of an annoyance that they go away.

      Miles Davis - 1
      Bach - 1
      Panoptic sort - 0

      So their response to prostitution and bloody fights was sax and violins?

    7. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      no scorpion filled pits are the way to go for mimes

    8. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of them are mimes.

      Now, everyone say it with me: "A mime is a terrible thing to waste."

    9. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to drive them away? You should keep them around and take their invisible boxes to pack things in. After all, a mime is a terrible thing to waste.

    10. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by tangelogee · · Score: 0

      but a mime is a terrible thing to waste!

    11. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by csrjjsmp · · Score: 1

      Charles Babbage, is that you?

    12. Re:This tactic is being used against adults also. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Makes perfect sense to me, in the context of the general masses shying away from such a person in fear they might catch whatever he has that makes him sit there and do that instead of "working" --because if he's sitting next to the door of your shop they're shying away from the shop too! :)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  19. WWII by Dutchy+Wutchy · · Score: 1

    Weren't many "atrocities" committed in World War II by avid listeners of classical music, and social movements formed that threw out classical arts? In 30 years, will they be blasting turn-of-the-millennium music?

    1. Re:WWII by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Still, classical music as a weapon is far inferior a choice compared with The Funniest Joke in the World, especially considering its application history in the WWII.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    2. Re:WWII by martas · · Score: 1

      yes, i remember how during my time in Auschwitz they'd collect the weakest of us every month into a room, and blast that joke through the speakers. all over the camp the ground would shake for several minutes from the laughter of those inside. once i overheard a few words (they never bothered to put proper sound insulation around the place), and had to tie myself up with some barbed wire that was lying around just to keep my sides from bursting.

      aaaah, there's the /. post that's finally gonna guarantee me a place in the warmer parts of hell!

  20. Video Games Live? by marcansoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder what they'll think of Video Games Live. Will "repugnant" classical music + awesome video game tunes make their heads explode?

    1. Re:Video Games Live? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Video games are responsible for some of the best classical music in my collection ; from Final Fantasy, through the Outcast soundtrack, all the way to the tracks from Total Annihilation.

    2. Re:Video Games Live? by YojimboJango · · Score: 1

      The thing about video game music is that it goes some where. Too much classical music sounds algorithmically generated to me, and from what I learned in my college music classes it's sometimes intentionally so. I like music that evokes feelings, and I've yet to be moved by any classical music to the extent that the score from Final Fantasy 3 has.

      YMMV but not everyone likes the old classical music, but that doesn't prohibit them from liking instrumental or orchestral music.

    3. Re:Video Games Live? by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      That is true, and I certainly enjoy video game orchestral type music quite a bit more than "typical" classical music - as you say, it tends to evoke feelings more often. I also find that there are many orchestral video game tunes that nonetheless sound very different from classical music - these composers do things that classical composers don't, even when using the same instruments.

      I still wonder what people conditioned into hating classical music would think of these kinds of video game tunes though. I wonder if it's a hate of "common" classical pieces (by name or by sound) or a general dislike for any arrangement that uses classical style instrumentation.

  21. Why classical? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

    Why not blast gansta rap at the poor, hapless souls during detention, with the lyrics changed to reflect what da Head "T" will do to them if they continue to question the value of his bling. Then, out of protest, we will get Mozart blasted out of tinny little mobile phones on the bus-ride home.

  22. Oh no by XanC · · Score: 1

    Please don't make me remember that joke. I remembered two words of it once, and spent several weeks in hospital.

    1. Re:Oh no by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I heard that the Germans tried it on teenagers at Hamburg railway station but it just led to a lot of thoughtful criticism and the purchasing of U2 CDs.

    2. Re:Oh no by Matejunkie · · Score: 1

      I heard that the Germans tried it on teenagers at Hamburg railway station but it just led to a lot of thoughtful criticism and the purchasing of U2 CDs.

      Nope, they're still doing this. I'm commuting every day to Hamburg and at the entrances of its central station they play classical music. And it's loud! You almost don't have a chance to ignore this even with headphones in your ears.

    3. Re:Oh no by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I heard that the Germans tried it on teenagers at Hamburg railway station but it just led to a lot of thoughtful criticism and the purchasing of U2 CDs.

      Nope, they're still doing this. I'm commuting every day to Hamburg and at the entrances of its central station they play classical music. And it's loud! You almost don't have a chance to ignore this even with headphones in your ears.

      woosh!

  23. It's a sin! by bistromath007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do Brits keep reading dystopian fiction to get ideas? Why aren't we bombing them for it?

    1. Re:It's a sin! by martas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      answer 1: that's the only kind of literature they're good at creating. why do you think shakespeare started in comedy but ended up in tragedy?
      answer 2: 'cause we don't want to waste perfectly good bombs. they're gonna destroy themselves pretty soon as it is.

    2. Re:It's a sin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uh. People started doing this in my hometown in the US more than 15 years ago. This isn't an exclusively British phenomenon.

    3. Re:It's a sin! by nOw2 · · Score: 1

      Because we live in a dystopian society. The government (and population; not all speakers/cctv/... are public owned) is just reacting against the social underclasses.

    4. Re:It's a sin! by Rigrig · · Score: 1

      Not a lot of politicians younger than 21, so I suppose they'll start burning books next...

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    5. Re:It's a sin! by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 0, Troll

      Britain is destroying itself much more quickly than a bombing campaign ever could.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    6. Re:It's a sin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do Brits keep reading dystopian fiction to get ideas? Why aren't we bombing them for it?

      Been there, done that... just gave them silly ideas.

      According to a hotel documentary I once saw, they seem to consider
      it impolite to mention the event. That's why you may not have heard
      about it.

    7. Re:It's a sin! by Burb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A better question might be to answer why so many slashdot readers lap this stuff up as if it were some kind of bizarre universal truth about the UK. It might well happen in isolated places, but not everywhere. Get a grip, lads. Is it any worse than the CIA blasting Barry Manilow at Noriega?

      --

    8. Re:It's a sin! by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, it means that the British dystopian fiction authors were really prescient.

      You know what that means? Don't make fun of the four-eyed, unwanted, loser kid in your school, lest he grows up to get hella-wizard on your ass.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    9. Re:It's a sin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why aren't we bombing them for it?

      The oil reserves are long gone.

    10. Re:It's a sin! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Because when the war with Eurasia comes, we'll need our airstrip to be nice and level. Bombs make these obnoxious craters that are ever so tedious to fix.

    11. Re:It's a sin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're the ones who wrote most of it in the first place.

      Don't tell me you thought those writers INVENTED any of it, did you? They all knew what was possible within the British culture, most of them thought it would happen a lot sooner.

  24. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noise isolating earphones anyone? I'm shure theres some cheaper solutions available. Destroying the speakers, drinking to the point that you start to enjoy classical music, or bring an old school boombox!

  25. Could not remotely work here by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Anyone under the age of 18 here has two earphones firmly attached to their ears, blasting loud enough for you to hear it, standing a good ten feet away from the teen. It just has to block out any noise under 130dB.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Could not remotely work here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Well, we just need to tell scientists to start working on some way to make the skull bones vibrate in a desired way at a distance, then. ~

  26. The Year 1812, Festival Overture in E flat major by dido · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pyotr Ilych Tchaikovsky, Op. 49. I'd like to hear them play that on the 5th of November at the Houses of Parliament...

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
  27. Hamburg, Germany has this for years by hvdh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hamburg central station started playing classical music about 10 years ago. The reason was to drive off junkies; there's a saying thay certain drugs in combination with classical music lead to a bad trip.

    1. Re:Hamburg, Germany has this for years by kirill.s · · Score: 1

      Classical music might improve the trip when on certain other drugs, so be careful not to get the wrong effect there ;)
      I bet they just wanted to make everyone a little happier with that stunt - if they wanted to make the druggies miserable, they should have chosen some kind of loud, obnoxious and terrifying music (don't want to give any modern examples) - but that would make everyone miserable.

    2. Re:Hamburg, Germany has this for years by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Which is completely bullshit...

      I know if you are talking about acid, ecstasy or psychedelic mushrooms the more complex the music is, the better.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  28. Revenge... by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's only one solution. Bring a boom-box to the bus stops, and start blasting Dr. Dre like it's 1992.

    Take that, old farts!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    1. Re:Revenge... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's only one solution. Bring a boom-box to the bus stops, and start blasting Dr. Dre like it's 1992.

      Take that, old farts!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

      1992? Dude, you ARE one of the old farts!

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:Revenge... by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. In 1992, they started giving us *grades* in school, like the big kids got.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  29. Well, the musicians suck... by pbooktebo · · Score: 1

    The caliber of musician you can get to go out to a subway at 2 a.m. and play for hooligans isn't great... Now, if they could get Yo-Yo Ma...

    1. Re:Well, the musicians suck... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      The caliber of musician you can get to go out to a subway at 2 a.m. and play for hooligans isn't great... Now, if they could get Yo-Yo Ma...

      I dunno about Yo-Yo Ma, but I heard they can get Yo Ma-Ma pretty easily.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  30. Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Classical music is quite enjoyable. You can point to plenty of musical/acoustic reasons why this is the case, as in the songs feature things that people find pleasing to hear. It is not the sort of thing that you require intense training to appreciate because it is all intellectual or something, and the actual sound is awful, it is simply nice to listen to.

    The primary reason that youth seems not to like it is a cool factor thing, not because the music itself is in some way offensive. When you grow up, you hopefully realize that is pretty stupid, and can enjoy it.

    1. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Classical music is quite enjoyable.

      Depends... ever hear it played on a pc-speaker?

    2. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you grow up, you hopefully realize that is pretty stupid, and can enjoy it.

      I highly doubt that. If you have been conditioned to associate classical music with something unpleasant (punishment, detention, the notion you are not welcome, etc.) I don't think you'll be able to enjoy it later on.

      It takes as little as a single spoiled meal that caused you stomach pain, to dislike a food for a very long time. Humans quickly associate things with something bad in order to avoid it in the future.

    3. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... does the Tetris-Theme count?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by mpe · · Score: 1

      Classical music is quite enjoyable. You can point to plenty of musical/acoustic reasons why this is the case, as in the songs feature things that people find pleasing to hear. It is not the sort of thing that you require intense training to appreciate because it is all intellectual or something, and the actual sound is awful, it is simply nice to listen to.

      The reason for this is that only music people like to listen to ever becomes "classical".

    5. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by distantbody · · Score: 1

      It is not the sort of thing that you require intense training to appreciate because it is all intellectual or something, and the actual sound is awful, it is simply nice to listen to.

      It does require some training or moderate understanding of classical instrumentation and arrangement to fully appreciate it. 'Intense' training isn't necessary by any means, but it does require some effort from the listener. Secondly, it has been shown that classical music demands the engagement of higher order functioning areas of the brain, which naturally a lot of youth don't have. It has also been shown to be the best music to study by.

      So it's not just about being 'cool', more like the small number of youth who appreciate it are 'uncool' to begin with. It's not snobbery either; older people are more inclined to be able to appreciate of it because of their mature brain structures, but it's not like everyone will find enjoyment in it after a certain age, I guess upbringing and even genetics would be factors also as to who might find captivation in classical music (I should add good classical music, as it certainly has its share of mediocre compositions).

    6. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      I enjoy classical music, but not when it's played
      a) too loud (can't hear myself think),
      b) too quiet (think elevator music), and/or
      c) on a shitty speaker system (any shop / public vehicle).

      My guess (didn't RTFA) is that a) and c) apply here, in which case, yes, they are unspeakable bastards for ruining the experience and using something the kids can't block out. They're just kids! Sure they can be rude and dishonest*, but do you really want a significant fraction of them growing up feeling like they are not wanted anywhere, before they have even done anything to deserve it? It's not like the local hang-out is an exclusive club for those with a criminal record.

      * Just like grown-ups, who are just better at disguising it.

    7. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by xaxa · · Score: 1

      IME, it's more like B and C. It's not meant to annoy people legitimately waiting for a train (etc).

      The point about not being wanted is spot on. It's stupid too. The media gives people a fear of "gangs of youths loitering", when they're mostly just standing around bored. The groups of drunk adults that cause more trouble.

    8. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by DMalic · · Score: 1

      Depends on the music, personal taste, etcetera. I love Beethoven's 9, most Mozart, CPE Bach, Bach's organ stuff, Vivaldi, Grieg, and am trying others. Nonetheless, some musicians are just *bad* to me: all atmosphere and no music; it sounds like a theme for a movie in the non-musical almost sound-effects like sense (Stravinsky, Bartok, etc.). On the other hand, Philip Glass, who I sincerely expected to hate (minimalist just sounded horrible) I loved the second I heard. Delving down through what you do and don't like to find more stuff you do and expand your horizons takes effort.

    9. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

      My introduction to classical music was hearing the Moonlight Sonata as integrated into Thexder through the speaker of a Tandy 1000 SL. Admittedly, the Tandy 1000's sound system was unusual and advanced for its time and produced effects and music very different from what we generally remember as PC speaker sound; however, the evolution of PC sound over the next few years followed a different path.

      You can configure DOSBox to replicate that gorgeous old sound!

    10. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I though that too when I was younger - I figured I just wasn't old enough to appreciate the nuances, or that I was looking for the wrong thing etc. But that hasn't changed - I still find most pieces of classical music that I've heard to be very dis-jointed and jarring to listen to. I don't find the cacophony of sounds and harmonies to be quite as pleasant as the few well placed beats and notes of a decent modern track. It's certainly not something I would refer to as 'catchy', it doesn't have me humming along at the time, or trying to tap out after I've heard it.

      That said however, I don't find that many modern tracks that I would consider to be of a decent quality either. So maybe it's just down to my lesser exposure to a variety of classical music (or the lesser variety of classical music available/in existence compared to modern) compared to the vast quantity and range of music available to us today.

      I do appreciate the technical difficulty of playing a classical piece, and can appreciate certain modern tracks when they have been played by orchestra's - the London Philharmonic doing the more famous Pink Floyd tracks immediately springs to mind - but that is an appreciation for a track I liked on electric instruments being given a different life and taking a different tone due to the instruments being used - I do not consider it to be classical music just because it is played on classical instruments (maybe that's where we disagree?).

      I wholly disagree with your suggestion that the primary reason that youth seems not to like it is a "cool factor thing" - while it may be true for some - I content that the music itself is simply not relevant to people today, we are less impressed by the sound of just one note being held on a string instrument than we are by a well formed beat or bass line. Moreover, I would suggest that the opposite of your suggestion is true; when you grow up you feel the need to partake in supposed sophisticated activities more often as a way of distancing yourself from the ever-increasing 'obvious' immaturity of youth (which is of course a perception issue). While I too have felt this pull (the impact of actually being the property ladder and thinking about pensions/wills etc. is still being felt in my household :s), I find it just as stupid to try and force yourself into liking things that just don't come naturally, as it would be to dislike it due to inverted snobbery.

      Though I still can't understand how anyone can find it so horrible that they would actually stay away from areas where it is being played - in fact I can't understand how it hasn't has the opposite effect, as many teens in my area seem to delight in staying places where they know they're not wanted? One method which does work and yet doesn't surprise me at all, comes from the tourists shops on Princess St. (the main high-street) in Edinburgh - where they pipe out some of the crappiest stereotypical 'Scotch' (deliberate misspelling) tourist tripe, apparently in an effort to attract customers - however I have literally seen groups of people run for shelter when the music is turned on.

    11. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by faboo · · Score: 1

      > It is not the sort of thing that you require intense training to appreciate

      In fact, your taste in music is based in very large part on the societal training you get as a child and young adult. Favors to rhythms, tonal quality, distance between the frequency of notes - all of that is determined by what you're exposed to during your life.

      And as a counter example: I love baroque era music, but romantic era music makes me ill. It isn't that there are absolute reasons why baroque music is pleasing or romantic music is abhorrent - it's just a quirk of my musical upbringing.

    12. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Kopachris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of todays "young people" somehow find classical music boring. This, I do not understand. Boring is listening to the exact same riff or chord over and over and over throughout an entire song without any variation. Classical music might do the same theme many times throughout a piece, but it's usually varied every time. Bach, for example, would take one theme and vary it a step at a time until it turned into a completely different theme.

    13. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, there is a reason the stuff we call classical music is still around after hundreds of years. I don't remeber who said it but someone said that 90% of all art in any given period is crap. This is correct. Over time, the crap stops being reproduced/preserved and all that is left is the good stuff. That is why I like most of the old songs I hear and dislike most of the new ones. It isn't that the old stuff was better, it's that no one plays the really bad old stuff anymore (and, generally, the older it is, the better it has to be to get played).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    14. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      The primary reason that youth seems not to like it is a cool factor thing, not because the music itself is in some way offensive.

      Or maybe they just, you know, don't like it, in the same way that I don't like country or punk. Yes, I know, it's shocking: not everyone has to like classical! *gasp*

    15. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      No the Tetris theme doesn't count, but classical music is quite enjoyable
      once you've bought the docking computer.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&v=3JwmZygqa_0

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    16. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      A lot of todays "young people" somehow find classical music boring. This, I do not understand.

      Many years back I took a class in the physics of music. One interesting tidbit I learned was the the perception of dissonance has changed over time, that intervals once considered to be dissonant are perceived less so today. If we associate dissonance with "tension" and consonance with release of that tension (an overly-simplistic model, sure), perhaps music that's several hundred years old lacks the emotional dynamic it had to its original listeners.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    17. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with the music itself - just self image. They associate classical music with _boring people_ - parents, teachers, and other stuffy authority figures. Modern music sells an identity and a social clique more than it sells the bits on the disc or the vibrations they encode.

      --
      For great justice.
    18. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Pretty much what some trance and industrial artists do, now that you mention it -- and for that matter, Robert Fripp in the early days of tape experiments. Start with something, add tiny increments here while removing something else there, and eventually you're in a whole different place. This thematic growth is, as you say, often absent in popular music.

      Conversely, I'm reminded of one particular country song that uses the same twang-thwang chord pair throughout, but continually adds and subtracts small variations around it, so the interactions change as it goes along, rather than the theme.

      As to the nominal topic, I agree that the probable deterrent is the uncoolness of being seen "listening" to that grup stuff. A generation from now, being seen listening to the Stones might be just as uncool.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Boring is listening to the exact same riff or chord over and over and over throughout an entire song without any variation.

      It might come as a surprise, but not all contemporary music consists of "exact same riff over and over" (even though a lot still does).

    20. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Most modern humans are stupider than people in previous centuries in many ways.

      Don't forget, Classical music was popular among the upper classes during its heyday. What's "popular" now isn't what's popular with the upper classes, it's what's popular with the masses.

    21. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Even more, people simply don't remember any of the old crap. There was probably plenty of crap made during Mozart's time too, but none of it was kept around, and no one from that time is alive (that we know of) to tell us what it was really like.

      I also imagine that the lower classes at that time listened to different music than the upper classes who liked Mozart's music.

    22. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      If you like something initially, it takes a lot of repetition for it to become boring to you. If you dislike it initially, you're likely to continue disliking it and call it boring even if what you feel is distaste.

      Baroque music, particularly on plucked keyboard instruments, is quite easy to be found boring by an inattentive listener, and most teens are easily distracted. They're looking for a quick shot of something distinctive, catchy, and instantly recognizable. The < 3 minute songs that have been popular for at least 60 years qualify in spades; most can be recognized by the first note. Try recognizing a piece on a clavichord by the first note, good luck.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    23. Re:Maybe they'll grow up as well as old by QuietObserver · · Score: 1

      Ugh, 8 bit sound. The Commodore 64 (1984-1992) had a three voice, monaural, 16 bit audio, and was one of the most unique sound systems of its day (SID audio is still distinct). However, 8 bit quality is a lot like what the PC speaker produces.

  31. What's that? A "war against youth"? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When did our kids becomes our enemies? It seems the UK do about everything in their power to alienate their youth. I really don't know about the UK, but is there really such a big problem with "unruly youths" that you have to bombard them with "deterrents" that seem to come from the privy closet of Marquis de Sade?

    What sadist comes up with those things? And why do I have the gut feeling that the only reason this is targeted at kids is just that they can't vote and thus can't kick the bastard off his comfy chair?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Funny

      off his comfy chair?

      well I have to say, the chair is rather nice. I wasn't expecting that...

    2. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      C'mon, could someone post the obvious Spanish Inquisition joke so we get it out of the way and can continue a sensible discussion? Please?

      I'm usually the first to pick up a good punchline, but obvious jokes are boring.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      but obvious jokes are boring.

      Obvious joke is obvious.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with recent development. Remember that a few decades ago, it was perfectly fine to hit children with wooden rulers, sticks, belts, whatever was at hand. Not punishing children was but a temporary fad.

      Older generations always felt the need to discipline younger ones.

      In my opinion, life is but a war of generations. The older ones cling to their beliefs and are afraid to get replaced by younger ones.

      Just like any animal the old have to ensure their dominance lest they become obsolete.

    5. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did our kids becomes our enemies?

      There's a good documentary called War On Kids that poses exactly the same question.

    6. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bulk of the British population are getting to the "get off my lawn, you rotten kids" age. Since neither they, nor their own childeren have been young in such a long time, they don't see why anyone else should be able to enjoy themselves.

      Bloody boomers...

    7. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xtracto · · Score: 5, Informative

      You may have such a stance because you do not know what horror is the young generation in the United Kingdom.

      I do, as I lived there, in one of the worst places regarding this (Liverpool) for about 4 years. Kids there do not care about anything, and as they know they have immunity, they will get into gangs just to do all sorts of vandalism.

      As an example, I know that if a kid commits a crime, the most that can happen to them is to get an "Asbo" (anti social behaviour order). I know some of them get a bracelet "asbo" for each crime. What is the result? the kids brag about who has more bracelets, because he is more "evil" or whatnot.

      In the time I lived there, a colleague of mine was hit by a paintball pellet in the eye while riding his bike from his Univ. office to his home; my flatmate was attacked by a van with kids shooting paintball pellets; another friend was thrown a car at him; another friend was walking at the street when some guys approached, took their glasses from his face and threw them (breaking them of course) to the ground. All this "just because". Oh yeah, and a Spanish friend was attacked and got his leg broken in 2 places.

      You see, the problem with this is that if any of these friends tried to defend themselves, according to English law, they would be attacking/harassing minors. And, because in addition we are foreigners (mainly PhD students) we would in addition be thrown out of the country.

      So yeah, in effect kids in the UK are pretty evil. But I agree with some of your posts in that the problem is not youths themselves but the general system who has forged them like that.

      What I saw while living there is that parents do not care about their children and their education. The government should make parents directly accountable for their kids actions: If your kid killed another kid then it is YOU who pays for the crime. If a kid robbed, then it is YOU who pay for the crime, as an adult. That way parents can continue to have the "freedom" of raising their kids as they want, but if the kids mess up, they will get the consequences.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    8. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been at War for over a decade now, Sir - the state can also use any music it pleases for the purposes of noise terrorism, as long as it dont contain "repetive beats", of course:

      "..at which amplified music ('wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats'.."

      (Criminal Justice Bill, 1994)

      ***

      So many people can't express what's on their minds
      Nobody knows them, nobody ever will
      Until their backs are broken, their dreams are stolen
      And they can't get what they want, then they're gonna get angry!
      Well it ain't written in the papers but its written on the walls
      The way this country is divided to fall
      So the cranes are moving on the skyline
      Trying to knock down this town
      But the stains on the heartland can never be removed
      from this country that's sick, sad and confused

      (The The, Heartland)

    9. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by gnasher719 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Unruly youths" is journalism code in Europe for "gangs of young Muslim men."

      You don't have a clue what you are talking about.

    10. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by nOw2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When did our kids becomes our enemies?

      Not kids in general, a specific underclass of kids that cause >40% of crime (aka 'anti-social behaviour' in modern terms).

      When they set fire to a car.
      When they sit fire to bins and push them, burning, up against the communal entrance to your apartment.
      When they break into your apartment complex's underground parking to have somewhere to drink, and smash everything on their way out.
      The 11 year old putting a brick through the windscreen of an Audi TT so he can spit on the seats, caught because his DNA was already on police records from previous arrests.
      Well, that's just this week. They were enemies before that.

    11. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mate - get some proportion. Since when was this a full-on assault against anyone and everyone under 18? Come to the UK and check it out before hyperventilating. Is there a problem with unruly youths? Yes - but only in certain places and at certain times. If those places are also those where pensioners and mothers of young children fear to tread due to a knot of hoodies with tins of Special Brew welded to their hands, then bring it on. I despair of the mentality that sees fit to pass summary judgement based on a fistful of second-hand information - you honestly don't have a f*cking clue.

      As to the Marquis de Sade reference - the only kind of torture this scheme gets even close to is the Monty Python Spanish Inquisition sketch:

      "Bring on the ... SOFT CUSHIONS!"

    12. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      but obvious jokes are boring.

      Obvious joke is obvious.

      Welcome to tautology club.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    13. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by ettlz · · Score: 2, Informative

      When did our kids becomes our enemies?

      The moment they threw stuff over everybody's cars. The moment they intruded into my garden and pissed all over it. The moment they ripped an ornament from its base and deposited it in a gutter fifty metres down the road.

    14. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by nOw2 · · Score: 1

      Thank you; if some of these other commenters lived in fear of stepping outside their home then maybe they'd rethink what sort of actions are permissible.

      It's worth noting that *music* and *sound* is being used as a weapon as VERY little else is legal to use. The police have very little powers too.

    15. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since the breakdown of "family" life in the UK for the past 15 years. Lot of kids in the UK especially major urban areas are mouthy, disrespectful and aggresive. Not going to get into a debate about why they are like that or whose fault it is - they just are. The country has gone to s****.

    16. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "their" children, I can bet anything, that none of those involved in that project have any children that fit in those groups or any children at all, since I doubt any of them has any experience raising children. It's just cruel and unusual punishment.

    17. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by profplump · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kids these days and their ASBOs. Back in your day the local constabulary just gave you a talking to, or maybe a quick swat upside the head. You didn't get any fancy bracelets, or an indefinitely recorded criminal record. Instead you had to create your own remembrances of youthful, disruptive behavior by painting stripes on the onions on your belt.

    18. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      really don't know about the UK, but is there really such a big problem with "unruly youths" that you have to bombard them with "deterrents" that seem to come from the privy closet of Marquis de Sade?

      Yes.

      (I say this as an American living over here who has to listen to these gangs of kids roaming the neighbourhood all night, smashing things and vandalising the place, and I happen to live in a very good neighbourhood not far from our erstwhile prime minister. It was even worse when I lived on the South Bank.)

      I don't know what happened in UK society (it was obviuosly before I lived here)...hell, I don't understand what went wrong in American society to bring our fascist right-wing wackos out like postnuclear cockroaches, so I certainly cannot begin to divine what happened on this side of the pond. Certainly basic politeness, for which the UK was known for so long, has all but vanished, replaced by belligerance and in-your-face animosity as a default greeting that makes us Americans look downright polite by comparison (go figure). Whether it is down to this, or some more fundamental cultural misfiring I really don't know. What I do know, from personal experience, is that there are a bunch of kids over here (a small minority, but still more than enough) that are completely out of control and downright dangerous, and unlike the US, they don't stay tucked away in "the bad part of town", they roam everywhere and wreak havoc all over the place. If you're extremely unlucky, you own a house worth less than your mortgage in an area they like to roam, in which case you're pretty much finished (thank [deity] I didn't buy during the boom years).

      Playing classical music is hardly out of the Marquis de Sade playbook, and if it pushes the yobs on down the road, then I'm all for it. Beats having the police around to crack heads...which was Chicago's solution to a similar problem.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    19. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      The problem starts before then. They can't or won't discipline their youth- the state nannies second guess everything- so they've got way to many little hellions over here. Moves like this are piss-poor reactionary measures to real social degeneration already well underway.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    20. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by dfenstrate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know what happened in UK society (it was obviuosly before I lived here)...hell, I don't understand what went wrong in American society to bring our fascist right-wing wackos out like postnuclear cockroaches, so I certainly cannot begin to divine what happened on this side of the pond.

      Well you've already revealed why you can't begin to divine what's happened over there.
      You've already said that America, with the 'fascist right-wing wackos' out and about- is downright polite compared to the UK.
      Would it be accurate to say then, that you find the UK's government more to your liking than America's?

      General social mores in the United States may give you 'fascist right-wing wackos', but they also give you kids who aren't feral.

      The society that has spawned the UK government has also spawned the same degenerate youth, with certain government policies- all very well meaning moves by enlightened lefties, you see- has helped the UK turn into what it is today. Or at least jolly Ol' England.

      No 'divining' is necessary to see the cause for the fall in the UK. The answer is apparent to all but folks who can only dismiss alternative viewpoints as those of 'fascist right-wing wackos.'

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    21. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      They became our enemies a few years after parenting went down the drain. (Note - I'm not talking about punishment, but about giving positive attention to your kids, spending time with them. And maybe even cooperating with the other parents when trouble arises in the flock).

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    22. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      You may have such a stance because you do not know what horror is the young generation in the United Kingdom.

      I do, as I lived there, in one of the worst places regarding this (Liverpool) for about 4 years.

      I'm disappointed that you've assumed all kids in the UK are like some from a rough bit of Liverpool. The ones round where I live (an OK bit of London) aren't like that, and the ones near where I work (a very nice bit of outer London) certainly aren't.

      Also, remember that "man defends himself after teenager hits him, man doesn't go to prison" isn't "news". Loads of these kids will be known to the police anyway.

      It's social class yet again.

    23. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'm disappointed that you've assumed all kids in the UK are like some from a rough bit of Liverpool. The ones round where I live (an OK bit of London) aren't like that, and the ones near where I work (a very nice bit of outer London) certainly aren't.

      I'm disappointed that you've assumed all kids are like the ones in the posh areas where you're fortunate enough to hang out.

      I'd say the average is closer to his end of the scale than yours.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your bad bit of Liverpool isn't the whole country. Even Liverpool (an area which the whole UK makes jokes about as regards to criminality) isn't representitive of the whole UK.

      In general it is a *tiny minority* of youth who are like this. The majority only cause typical teenage trouble to their parents and nothing else.

      It's not as if it is a specific to the UK problem. There are youth like this all over the world. Only recently I was watching an article on Spanish TV about juvenile delinquency, alcohol abuse, and anti social behaviour in Madrid. Recently there was a news item in the Spanish press about someone who had just been released from prison (who had been implicated in burning a girl to death) being put back in prison again for stealing from cars. There are probably British counterparts to your Spanish friend.

    25. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xaxa · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm disappointed that you've assumed all kids are like the ones in the posh areas where you're fortunate enough to hang out.

      Where did I do that?

      I'd say the average is closer to his end of the scale than yours.

      It may well be, but this isn't the Daily Mail comments section: shades of grey are permitted.

    26. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's just cruel and unusual punishment.

      Well done. You just demeaned real cases of cruel and unusual punishment, like cutting hands off or execution, by lumping them all in the same category.

      Get a sense of perspective, drama queen.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I'm disappointed that you've assumed all kids in the UK are like some from a rough bit of Liverpool.

      Unfortunately my subjective experience was not good; I was attacked two times, once, someone threw a fruit or something from their car, fortunately not hitting me; the second time, a motherf1!@$!@ kid threw a can with "vimto" from a double-story bus while it stopped at the bus stop where I was calmly waiting for my bus.

      However if you look around you will see that my subjective views and assumptions are not so far from the objective truth. You can take a look at this: What is wrong with British youth? or a more scientific report: Make Me a Criminal:Preventing youth crime

      The UK suffers from two related problems that define the terrain within which youth crime is debated. First, evidence seems to show that we experience higher and more sustained levels of youth crime and anti-social behaviour than culturally similar countries. Second, the UK public experiences more fear of crime and concern about youth misbehaviour than citizens elsewhere.

      In general, I enjoyed a lot my stay in the UK; almost everything was great. Liverpool itself is a great city with a lot of culture and places to go out nearby; and the fact that they have Manchester airport close is great. However, the children are a real treat. I remember one of the first things I was told in my first meeting with the "Mexican society" in Liverpool was "Beware of the kids, if you see a group of two or three kids walking in the street just walk into the other side of the road", and "do not dare to enter into a park when a bunch of kids/young guys are there".

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    28. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      My subjective view is that I lived in the UK all my life (24 years), and have never been attacked by anyone. The media here is awful, they blow everything out of proportion, and people seem to believe them.

      The Telegraph article says: "Researchers concluded that the situation has been fuelled by social inequality that condemns poor children to an inferior life." The first primary recommendation of the IPPR paper is "Tackling child poverty".

      There are big problems that need to be solved (and I think most of them aren't specific to children), but it doesn't help when people insist that all teenagers are bad.

    29. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know which parts of London you frequent, or how much of an asshole you must be to receive "in-your-face animosity" as a default greeting there, but your generalizations about the UK are ridiculous and don't match most people's experience of London itself, let alone the rest of the country.

      I strongly suspect that you are not in fact living in a good neighbourhood. The UK is by no means alone in having the odd bad neighbourhood within cities of over 2 million people.

      I also can't help wondering how (and in what circumstances) you are "greeting" people on the street. But judging from your overall tone, I think I can guess.

      Suggest you buy a house outside the UK's most densely-populated city. Or, preferably, leave the country entirely and take your blinkered generalizations with you.

    30. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      I don't know which parts of London you frequent, or how much of an asshole you must be

      Your ad homonem attack in response to a little criticism of the current state of affairs (that frankly, nearly every British person I've met has echoed) kind of makes my point on rudeness for me. You sound as angry and bitter as any Teabagger I've met when faced with criticism of the US, no matter how obviously true that criticism is.

      I've seen women on crutches shoved aside by young people in a hurry to get past. I've seen elderly people left standing by teenages and adults on the tube (and shoved past by said people so they can grab the last empty seat). I saw one woman on the bust pushed to the floor by a kid who couldn't have been more than twelve years old because he wanted to get past and apparently couldn't bring himself to utter an "excuse me".

      And I've seen the behaviour a numerous groups of teenagers roaming the streets where I live. As for the part of town I live in, I happen to be on the same square as Tony Blair, so your theory that this is somehow a "bad part of town" really doesn't wash (and won't with anyone who knows London).

      There are a lot of wonderful things about the UK, and I love it here, but polite and well-behaved youth isn't one of them. Does that make all young people bad? No, but it does lower the bar of expectation for everyone, and unfortunately, most people tend to live up to what is expected of them. Which came first is a chicken and egg question, and predates my own experince here, but I can obverve what is going on around me, and you insinuating it must be me is disengenious at best.

      Stop shooting the messenger (unless you want to also set your sites on ITV, the BBC, and just about every other news organisation in the country, and every person with two eyes in their head).

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    31. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you visited England lately? There are a *LOT* of single parent kids, bopping from household to household while their moms pick "partners" or not, with many of them and their moms living "on the dole". They, and their parents, are under-employed or unemployable, they're anti-intellectual, anti-work, anti-foreigner, racist, and as classist as any Britich comedy, with fine lines among the different kinds of white kid they happen to be, or the different regions of England they come from, or treacherously fine lines depending on what kind of work their parents do. London is international enough to be a bit different, but being publicly gay is *deadly* outside of London. Being non-Christian or non-white is bad enough throughout the country. I'm in all of those loathed groups, and I had one hell of a time when I couldn't disguise myself a s nice white Christian boy.

      Those kids are treated as enemies because they are. Even though it's the fault of the "partner" dads who aren't around, and the "what can I do with him or her?" mums who are too busy at work to be home with the kids, and both their fault for creating these kids without actually planning to raise them as a family. Educational standards that replaced learning multiplication tables with some weird new math called "chunking" and other visionary "new" standards for education. (Don't get me started about "chunking"!) Sir Baden Powell had solid ideas of training the young boys to be men in the Boy Scouts, but the Boy Scouts seem to be basically gone in England: as near as I can tell, there aren't enough kids with dads to actually organize troops. And nothing has filled that social void. The result is what we see: idle teens without purpose, filling the hours.

      Not all kids are like this, of course. But it's too easy for them to fall into, and blasting music into their heads isn't going to lead them *towards* anything.

    32. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Careful who you're calling wackos - they've been winning 48% of the popular vote in all but the most recent elections - get that up to 51 and the other side becomes the wackos...

    33. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Aceticon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The inner city kids have nothing to do because:
      - There is a lack of adequate nature spaces and sports fields in the inner cities. Probably because land is at a premium and city councils would rather waste money in monthly glossy magazines promoting themselfs than in creating a well-balanced environment to live in.
      - There are not enough community activities for young people in large part due to overboard Healt & Safety nuttyness blocking each an every inititiative that might involve any kind of risk (real or perceived).

      Also:
      - There are lots of self contained areas of high unemployment and poverty (aka Housing Estates).
      - A media driven culture that values wealth and individualistic selfishness above all means that people around here are raised to not give a damn about other people, including their families.

      So you end up with groups of hormone filled, immature youths with no money, no job and nothing to do, immersed in a culture that does not include the notion of respect for anybody else (not elders, not your parents, not teachers, nobody).

      It's thus not suprising that England has the problems it has with youth violence ...

    34. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Or when they get out around 5:00 with gotcha pellet guns shooting at people biking from their job.
      Or when they throw their dogs to people passing by a park.
      Or when they grab your cap/hat while passing at your side you while you wait for the bus
      Or when they steal your bike seat (that was the most puzzling thing that happened to me in the UK)
      Or when they put an old man in fire
      Or when they get guns and kill smaller kids that happen to be peacefully playing outside their home

      Oh well shit... I could continue for hours

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    35. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Dominic · · Score: 1

      London != UK. Most people in the UK find Londoners extremely rude. It's why we will visit it but wouldn't ever want to actually live there.

    36. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Just one issue, and is related to my previous post (which summarize my bad experience with kids in the UK), the *real* problem are not the kids, the problem are their parents. Parents must be made directly responsible for their children crimes.

      In these kinds of societies (where kids have high immunity) parents should pay the crimes committed by their kids. Only on this way will the parents start to get interest in whether they are raising their children correctly (for society).

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    37. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      And so, the problem from my vantage point is that they are so set against using real punishment against people who are actively disruptive and doing illegal things, that they have to use these ridiculous notions? If someone puts a brick through a window, that's a property crime, and they should go to jail or have to pay for it. Assault, battery, vandalism are all crimes that reasonable societies have a punishment for when you're an adult that generally works as at least something of a deterrent. Anti-social behavior bracelets? Seriously?

      I mean, I have major problems with the American system of "you smoke dope you do time" industry, but this is ridiculous in a whole different direction.

    38. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be true if you just compare UK and the US. But the world is larger than that. The Scandinavian countries and many other European countries has policies in place that could bee seen as far more "enlightened leftist" than in the UK. At the same youth in these countries are in general more well behaved. Even though we been victims of well meaning policies since we where babies.
      While this is most certainly a reflection of the British society, I don't think that enlightened lefties are wholly to blame. In fact I think that the blame should be put everywhere else than on well meaning policies.

    39. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      London != UK. Most people in the UK find Londoners extremely rude. It's why we will visit it but wouldn't ever want to actually live there.

      Ah, probably should have qualified that then. :-)

      I also should have made clearer that "in-your face rudeness" is not a general phenomenon of UK culture (most people are still pretty polite, though not to the degree as when I worked here fourteen years ago), it is (or appears to be) a culternal phenomenon of many of the youth in the country, which may cause a portion of then to tip over into overt violence (or not...as I said, I have no idea what led to this situation). It's interesting in that it is in some ways analogous to so-called gang culture in the US (how the word "culture" can be associated with gangs is beyond me--strikes me as political correct speak run amok), yet is very different in terms of demographics, the form of misbehaviour, and what drives it (random violence seems more common than enforcing a drug turf, for example).

      I think it is absolutely brilliant that folks here have come up with such an elegant, non-violent solution to at least one facet of the problem--playing beautiful classical music until their ears bleed. Clever, effective, almost certainly thought up by someone most of us would deem somewhat eccentric--absolutely brilliant, and quintessentially British.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    40. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.

    41. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You have no right to defend yourself in the UK? Wow. Just wow.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    42. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Countries that are much more far-left politically than the UK don't have these problems, so your theory is crap.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    43. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every now and then a kid needs his ass kicked. Putting a brick through an Audi TT windshield would have gotten me a belt to my ass, a fat lip, and 6 months grounding when I was a kid, as it should any kid that does something like this. Then the money to pay for the new windshield would have come out of my birthday and christmas budget for the 2-3 years it would have taken to make up the money. When you fucked up at my house, and pissed off my dad, you really didn't want it to ever happen again.

      That's the problem with kids. The parents aren't allowed to discipline them, because if they do they are demonized and arrested.

      I am a well adjusted adult that knows right from wrong. My dad had to beat my ass exactly twice. However, I respected him.

    44. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vinny Gambini: It is possible that the two yutes...
      Judge Chamberlain Haller: ...Ah, the two what? Uh... uh, what was that word?
      Vinny Gambini: Uh... what word?
      Judge Chamberlain Haller: Two what?
      Vinny Gambini: What?
      Judge Chamberlain Haller: Uh... did you say 'yutes'?
      Vinny Gambini: Yeah, two yutes.
      Judge Chamberlain Haller: What is a yute?
      Vinny Gambini: Oh, excuse me, your honor...
      Vinny Gambini: Two YOUTHS

    45. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of inner city kids with the same circumstances who are not running amok. Saying that their bad behavior is not their responsibility and is because society doesn't give them enough green space is a cop out and basically says to the kids who aren't running amok in the same circumstances, "you might as well be because we won't hold you responsible for your actions." Parents too deserve responsibility in this.

      Also, I lived in Uganda where there is a much greater divide between the social classes and most people are very poor. They don't have any sort of "community activities" for young people. They pretty much just turn them loose in the morning and collect them at night... and they are FAR better behaved than 99% of western kids.

    46. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      Really? Name some!

    47. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Faluzeer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hmmm

      You appear to be placing the blame for the problem on the current Labour Government, this IMHO is generalising things. We have spent more time in the last 30 years under a right wing government (the Conservative Party) than we have under the Labour Party. It is should also be noted that these problems existed under the Conservative Government.

      The Anti-Social Behaviour Order legislation (commonly referred to as an ASBO) was first put before parliament by the Labour Government in December 1997 (approx 7 months after coming to power), it became law in July 1998 (approx 14 months after coming to power). One of the reasons for the legislation was to tackle such unruly behaviour by children, behaviour that whilst annoying, was previously not deemed as serious enough to warrant a police investigation / prosecution.

      There are many reason why certain areas of the country experience these problems, from poverty to lack of parental control, but I believe that the lack of urban recreation areas has certainly contributed to the problem. Under the Conservative Government recreational land was sold off for housing, this policy continued under the current Labour Government.

      I was brought up on a large council estate (for you Americans, read public housing) on the outskirts of a large northern england city. Whilst both my estate, and the city in general were poor, we at least had decent recreational land, 3 football pitches, 2 rugby pitches, 2 sand pits, running tracks and a cricket pitch. I recently revisited the area. Now there is only 1 remaining football pitch, the rest has been turned into housing (and housing that is far more densely concentrated than the old council estate ever was).

      TLDR / Executive Summary
      Both sides of the political spectrum in the UK have contributed to the problem, so it is unfair to place the blame on only one side.

    48. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, the problem with this is that if any of these friends tried to defend themselves, according to English law, they would be attacking/harassing minors.

      Yeah. Duh. That's why free people jealously guard Freedom Zero: the right to life, which implies the right to self defense using deadly force. UK is not a free country, (neither freedom zero nor freedom one, which is free speech) yet can't bring itself to be quite authoritarian enough to enjoy the low-crime benefits of fascism. It's the worst of both worlds. Good luck over there! My system here in America is certainly flawed, but not so flawed as in the UK.

    49. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by ettlz · · Score: 1

      this isn't the Daily Mail comments section

      GODWIN!

    50. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      ...and that's the strangest -1 Troll I've ever received.

    51. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      To make this work, you do need to enable the parents to actually discipline their kids.

      Sure, raising them right in the first place is important. But, if a parent messes up and gets a fine when their kid destroys something, what are they to do about it?

      You could disown them, which doesn't really solve the problem.

      Other than that what are you going to do - threaten to beat the kid? I'm sure in most progressive societies that will get you more than the fine you're trying to avoid. If you tell the kid to come home after school and not burn down the mall, what recourse do you actually have if they do the opposite?

      Blaming the parents amounts to outsourcing the police. However, if you're going to do that, you had better start allowing parents to construct cells.

    52. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A number of factors like technology, the shift to predominantly urban culture, and our generally high level of prosperity, have conspired to separate youth from adults. Youth used to have "chores", and they used to take all day to complete, just to survive. Now, youth are free to roam about all day long, bored from lack of any meaningful goals in life. That's not a problem that more youth recreation centers (i.e., more government spending) is going to solve, since it's still just occupying their free time. They need _work_.

      Culture is no longer transmitted from the old to the young, so teenagers pick up their ideas about meaning/purpose/goals from each other and the popular media. They have no connection to their own past, and no idea where they are headed. Postmodern society reeks like this.

      Fortunately, this problem will be self-correcting, as they will eventually tear up enough cities that the general level of prosperity will drop again.

    53. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 1

      If your kid killed another kid then it is YOU who pays for the crime. If a kid robbed, then it is YOU who pay for the crime, as an adult.

      Sins of the Son? Interesting.

      Good thing that in Texas, someone attacks you on your property, you can shoot them. "Oh, it was a 15 year old? All I heard was someone threatening my family!"

    54. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unruly youths" is journalism code in Europe for "gangs of young Muslim men."

      You don't have a clue what you are talking about.

      Actually in France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland etc, the equivalent of the chavs and neds are mostly of north african or african origin.
      In my country 70% of the inmates declare themselves muslims.

      And yes when a journalist says "a gang of young people" we all understand "a gang of young people from north africa / africa". Because they simply do not use that term for anyone else.

      A good indicator is an article reading "Edgard (modified first name) mugged a grandma". They do not modify the first name (and say they do so) unless it would be politically incorrect to state the actual first name. Because "Ahmed mugged a grandma" would be perceived as racist.

      It becomes fun when a newspaper uses the actual first name in an article but all the other newspapers use modified first names in order to hide the origin of the "young people".

      And we have all kinds of Newspeak like that on several subjects, I do not know why but it becomes tiring.

    55. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you end up with groups of hormone filled, immature youths with no money, no job and nothing to do, immersed in a culture that does not include the notion of respect for anybody else (not elders, not your parents, not teachers, nobody).

      How is this different from any other time in any other country? Everyone likes to talk about the good old days, but I think we all know it's a load of crap.

      I think it is only the amount and pervasiveness of the media coverage. Where a few kids beating up or killing another might have been local news, now it makes national or international headlines.

      I think youth today are rude little snots, but I am sure that's how I was thought of 20 years ago. Thus the wheel turns.

      Which was the real message of Burgess (if you were lucky enough to get chapter 21).

    56. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The rest of Europe?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    57. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, and a Spanish friend was attacked and got his leg broken in 2 places.

      As much as you damn limeys have against guns, right here, having a concealed firearm would have stopped this shit in about five seconds. No more hooligans in training to much up society.

    58. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Over 1 million members on facebook!

    59. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by sjames · · Score: 1

      You have to wonder, what about the surrounding society is repugnant enough that offending it is a mark of honor amongst the youth? Why isn't that changed? Perhaps it's been made quite clear to them (intentionally or not) that they are not welcome in that society?

      I don't claim that anything makes violent crime acceptable, just that there is generally a cause and effect relationship involved somewhere in the process.

    60. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they resent being stuffed into an underclass? That has been known to create resentment and the sorts of crimes you're talking about sound like natural human responses to resentment.

    61. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by sjames · · Score: 1

      General social mores in the United States may give you 'fascist right-wing wackos', but they also give you kids who aren't feral.

      No, it just keeps the feral kids confined to their ghettos. It's not REALLY surprising that right-wing fascist wackos would find that solution.

    62. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      continue a sensible discussion?

      Excuse me sir this is slashdot. I think you're looking for digg. Down the hall first door on the left.

    63. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by patch0 · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's not typical of the UK, that's just Liverpool....

    64. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The government should make parents directly accountable for their kids actions: If your kid killed another kid then it is YOU who pays for the crime. If a kid robbed, then it is YOU who pay for the crime, as an adult.

      The rest of the world raises their kids just fine without such draconian procedures. I'd suggest you find out how they do it and copy them instead.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    65. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They became our enemies when we started dropping them off at the mall to get rid of them for the day.

    66. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Hatta · · Score: 1
      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    67. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is when a well trained English Mastiff comes in handy. Also, pepper spray.

    68. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they resent being stuffed into an underclass? That has been known to create resentment and the sorts of crimes you're talking about sound like natural human responses to resentment.

      Or maybe they're just a bunch of undisciplined little shits who are the crotch droppings of other undisciplined little shits who've been brought up in a nanny state that doesn't much believe in disciplining children anymore. Hence they run wild.

      If Britain had any sense at all they'd start hanging the little hooligans en masse once a fortnight.

    69. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To which the answers been known for generations - take away their immunity or failing that wooden pegs and a piece of cheese wire.

    70. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say it in jest, but I do actually think there's a grain of truth in that.

      Imagine you're young, poor and you happen to hang out with people your age because they're seen as cool, but they're actually criminals-to-be. Why? Because you're a kid and don't know better. You only know that they have the fancy stuff (well, 5-finger discount makes it possible...) and they're "tough" and nobody messes with them, actually, they mess with you when they feel like. Attractive? You bet.

      By the time you're 16, you have accumulated enough ASBOs and a file big enough to make you look like you're 20 when you step on it. That's also about the time when you rationalize: Fuck it, I'm fucked. With a record like this, I won't get a sensible job. So... why bother trying?

      And you start to impress the younger kids, who look up to you, how cool you are, because you have all the fancy stuff and are tough...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    71. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Gee, who would have thought that being poor and having no outlook in life, no future to aspire to and no perspective at all could cause frustration and anti-social behaviour...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    72. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by martyros · · Score: 1

      Not to mention kids being sent to school at the age of 4, and spending the next 14 years being "socialized" in a completely unnatural environment: people of exactly the same age, with little opportunity to change who you spend time with, and very little consequences for your actions.

      Seriously, when in the rest of your life are you ever in a situation like school? At work, you have people probably ranging at least from 25 to 45, probably more like 25 to 60. In general, people who act like jerks and idiots are fired (or never hired in the first place). If you don't like your job, or the jerks aren't fired for some reason, quit and find another one; you're not stuck with these people.

      Socially speaking, school is completely unlike life after school, and is poor preparation for it.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    73. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids there do not care about anything, and as they know they have immunity, they will get into gangs just to do all sorts of vandalism.

      I agree. Absolving children of the responsibility for their own actions is the worst kind of signal to send them.

      The government should make parents directly accountable for their kids actions: If your kid killed another kid then it is YOU who pays for the crime. If a kid robbed, then it is YOU who pay for the crime, as an adult. That way parents can continue to have the "freedom" of raising their kids as they want, but if the kids mess up, they will get the consequences.

      Wait, what? One moment you're making it clear that the lack of personal responsibility is the problem, then you're making the PARENTS 100% responsible and sticking them in jail? Sure they might be shitty parents, and a fine might be in order here, but sticking them in jail and letting the kids walk (or walk with a far lighter sentence) won't fix it either. The problem is that the kids aren't learning about consequences for their actions early on. They're either getting NO penalties (the current situation) or delayed penalties, e.g. the difficulty of getting a job some time down the road with criminal history in your past. (I'm not certain about how records as a minor are handled in the UK, so they may not even get the eventual penalties at all)

      I'm not advocating turning the kids in to enemies of the state; they aren't. They're just kids being jackasses. It's what kids do. But the extreme cases are obviously an indication that a lot of them need help and need to learn personal responsibility. Not have the consequences shifted from "nobody" to "mom and dad" without any personal accountability. I don't believe in law for the sake of law, but I do believe in taking responsibility for your actions by facing the consequences for them without excuses.

    74. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my god, why does every critique of america make the fascist right-wing wackos go 'well if you don't like it here then go somewhere else! nyuuhhhh nyuhhhh.' Just state it outright, don't bother with fancy words like 'accurate' or 'precise.' And yes I'm trolling.

      fyi, I'm not sure what you're 'alternative viewpoint' is, but in addition to it there is undeniably a strain of fascist-right-wing-wackoism in the U.S. In other countries too, of course. And the irony is that the survivalist will survive the nuclear apocalypse!

    75. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by metlin · · Score: 1
    76. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it socially acceptable there for someone to smack another person's kid around when caught misbehaving? Do parents do that? there has to be a strong disciplinary force at work there somehow

    77. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Brits, send your bad kids to Kansas. We can deal with them.

      In my city of about 100,000, a man's house was broken into in the middle of the night by a pair of teens. They stole his TV and several other valuable items before the man awoke and chased them out of his house with a rifle.

      The kids decided there was too much good stuff in this guy's house to pass up, so they went back the next night. The first one went in through the window, to find the homeowner was waiting for him, and the kid took two high power rifle rounds to the chest. His friend, in an alpha male sort of way, decided to pull out his pistol and before he even got to aim, the homeowner had shot him several times. The first of the two survived and later told police that they had gone back to steal a Playstation.

      Years passed before anyone tried this again.

      Last year, there were a string of home invasions. Most of the time, the burglars found the homeowner in bed, and threatened them with a weapon to give them valuables. This worked well until the burglars broke into the trailer of an Iraq war vet, who shot the two burglars 13 times. Both burglars survived, live in great pain, and will stand trial.

      There have been no home invasions since.

      Come on UK, give your citizens back the right to defend themselves.

    78. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (how the word "culture" can be associated with gangs is beyond me--strikes me as political correct speak run amok)

      Using the word "culture" has more to do with anthropology than political correctness, and it is a valid usage in that context (though maybe "sub-culture" would be more accurate for what we are describing). Like many words in English "culture" has multiple and only somewhat related meanings. You seem to use only the first few definitions from the list I linked, which have a generally connotation. The term "gang culture" is a correct usage according to the fifth and sixth definitions, but these definitions are morally neutral and apply equally whether the overall aspects of a given culture are positive or negative.

    79. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Who let all this riff-raff into the room?

      There's one smoking a joint!

      And another with spots!

      If I had my way......

      I'd have all of you SHOT!

    80. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snap!

    81. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      This is precisely where the Right went wrong in the US over the last 10 years. Winning elections does not mean you are not a wacko. You could just be a really convincing wacko.

      What makes someone a wacko is inability to accept and deal the real world on its own terms. Certian people got it in their heads that they could somehow change basic science, economics, sociology, etc. just by comming up with ideas they would like to be true, and publicising them heavily. The real world ain't like Tinkerbell; it doesn't care how hard you believe.

    82. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Kids there do not care about anything, and as they know they have immunity, they will get into gangs just to do all sorts of vandalism.

      Sounds like they have defined "kid" wrong. Lower age of majority recommended.

    83. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is fucked up.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    84. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame that there isn't the opportunity for a score of 6 for the exceptionally insightful.

    85. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Jaqenn · · Score: 1

      How about a tattoo on the forehead reading "Poor Impulse Control".

      --
      You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
    86. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Sadly, when the percentages climb high enough, it doesn't matter... they all believe in Tinkerbell, therefore she exists and matters in a very life affecting way .....I'm starting to get mental images of the Inquisition now.....

      W took his 51% win as a "mandate from the people" to continue his agendae, too bad it took 4 more years for the people wake up.

    87. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I really don't know about the UK, but is there really such a big problem with "unruly youths" that you have to bombard them
      >with "deterrents" that seem to come from the privy closet of Marquis de Sade?

      Yes

      Now get of my ...

      fuckit now I've gone and dropped me biscuit in me tea ...

    88. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by fishexe · · Score: 1

      I really don't know about the UK, but is there really such a big problem with "unruly youths" that you have to bombard them with "deterrents" that seem to come from the privy closet of Marquis de Sade?

      I don't think Mozart was ever in the privy closet of the Marquis de Sade. He was too busy with the barmaids and other wenches.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    89. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by fishexe · · Score: 1

      You may have such a stance because you do not know what horror is the young generation in the United Kingdom.

      ...

      Kids there do not care about anything, and as they know they have immunity, they will get into gangs just to do all sorts of vandalism.

      ...

      You see, the problem with this is that if any of these friends tried to defend themselves, according to English law, they would be attacking/harassing minors.

      So how about we change the law as a deterrant, instead of blaring classical music as a deterrant?

      So yeah, in effect kids in the UK are pretty evil.

      That's not what you're describing at all. It's a broken system, not broken people. YOU try learning to respect others in a country that systematically encourages you not to.

      The government should make parents directly accountable for their kids actions: If your kid killed another kid then it is YOU who pays for the crime. If a kid robbed, then it is YOU who pay for the crime, as an adult. That way parents can continue to have the "freedom" of raising their kids as they want, but if the kids mess up, they will get the consequences.

      That's kind of a dumb idea. How about the kids suffer the consequences for their own actions, instead of the current system where (if your description is correct) there are no consequences? Seems like a fix to me.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    90. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assaulted by a piece of fruit? When will you people in the UK learn that Monty Python was a comedy show, not a training manual.

    91. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being weaklings and go kick some prepubescent ass.

    92. Re:What's that? A "war against youth"? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, for Germany, and foreigners from Muslim countries, he’s right.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  32. Math, Music, and Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A large amount of classical music is based on mathematics, and multiple generations have failed to produce adequate math skills.
    The modern mass populace dislikes classical music.

    A reason for this might be because their brains have been rewired to dislike math by cultural and educational systems. Therefore their brain's cannot process the information that classical music contains.
    The brain will repulse something it does not understand, or be interested by it. Which would explain the reason for classical music lovers, and the mass populace who hates math and thereby hates classical music.

    Just a theory, make sure to spot holes

    1. Re:Math, Music, and Madness by madpansy · · Score: 1

      Many people like music they can dance (or nod their head) to, and the waltz isn't exactly in.

      Enjoying math isn't a requirement for enjoying classical or any other music, because our brains are wired to do the math automatically. Anyone who isn't tone deaf unconsciously does mathematical analysis of sound wave frequency, recognizing various relationships between melody and harmony or lack thereof.

  33. Come on by wilwad · · Score: 1

    I read the story expecting the opposite: expected it to say it was turning bad kids around by bringing the burning candlelight of classical music into their dark lives. Disappointed. I love Classical Music.

  34. why not by extraqwert · · Score: 1

    Actually, a large part of the classical music is religious. Which could be considered a form of social control

    1. Re:why not by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      "a large part of the classical music is religious."

      Are you sure about that? Most classical music doesn't even have words, so it can't really be considered overtly religious (maybe the intentions of the creator were to worship God through the creation of the piece, but if that were the definition of religious than lots of buildings, architecture, TPS reports and all sorts of things would suddenly become "religious").

      Plus, many great classical composers were not really religious at all.

  35. Taste in music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to wonder if this only works on kids with particular taste in music? Metal was my introduction to Classical Music.

  36. classical music is defective by r00t · · Score: 1

    Yes Mozart, we recognize that it's possible to play some sections much louder than other sections. Tricking me into cranking up the volume with quiet parts just so that you can hurt my ears with other parts is childish.

    Actually, I doubt it was really that awful centuries ago. The orchestra would have been burned at the stake or worse. Abusive dynamic range is probably a modern misinterpretation.

    1. Re:classical music is defective by Pentium100 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, and when Tchaikovsky wrote 1812 he intended the canons to be about as loud as the triangle.

      Anyway, if you do not like wide dynamic range in a recording, you can get a player that has integrated compressor or get an external compressor. It is much easier to compress than to expand, meaning that while I have an expander (dbx 3BX-DS) I cannot restore the dynamic range back to original if I have a crappy compressed CD.

      While we will never know how Mozart intended his compositions to sound (unless someone invents a time machine, goes back in time and asks him) I prefer higher dynamic range over lower. Yes, when you are listening to music as a background while doing something else it may be better to compress the dynamic range and play a a consistent, but low level, but if you are listening to music not as a background, wide dynamic range is much better.

      Tricking me into cranking up the volume with quiet parts just so that you can hurt my ears with other parts is childish.

      See, the quiet parts are supposed to be quiet. You have to set the volume so that the quiet parts can be heard, but not be loud, then your ears won't hurt when the loud part comes. The dynamic range of human hearing is 120dB, the theoretical CD dynamic range is 96dB, tape and records have lower dynamic range and CDs usually are recorded with lower dynamic range too, so it shouldn't hurt your ears.

    2. Re:classical music is defective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a shame Mozart did not account for all the morons of the 20th and 21th century that damaged their own ears by cranking up the volume with headphones.

    3. Re:classical music is defective by DMalic · · Score: 1

      On headphones (and replicating my headphones with speakers would cost thousands of dollars) I'm a bit afraid for my hearing unless I constantly adjust the volume with some music. Nonetheless, I do agree that overcompression modern-style is awful.

    4. Re:classical music is defective by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      See, the quiet parts are supposed to be quiet. You have to set the volume so that the quiet parts can be heard, but not be loud, then your ears won't hurt when the loud part comes. The dynamic range of human hearing is 120dB, the theoretical CD dynamic range is 96dB, tape and records have lower dynamic range and CDs usually are recorded with lower dynamic range too, so it shouldn't hurt your ears.

      The problem here is that many people nowadays listen to classical music in settings where it's not completely quiet (a car, for example) where ambient noise can drown out some of the quieter parts. Combine that with the fact that recording isn't completely perfect and you get people turning up the volume to even hear it and then being blasted with sharp horns wailing in misery over their ruptured eardrums.

    5. Re:classical music is defective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDs don't have 96 dB dynamic range. That's just mindless repeating of the value of -20*log(2^-16)/log(10). Most people who parrot that value have no idea what it means. When you're ~96dB down, all of the resolution you've got is one bit. Try listening to any music, sampled at 48kHz, and quantized down to one bit. Resume reading after you've tried it. Seriously. By the time you're beyond 98dB down, there are no more bits and whatever you've got there is truncated to zero.

      For classical music without compression, you need a 24 bit quantizer and either a variable gain processor to get it down to 16 bits, or a digital stream that can keep those 24 bits.

      Our hearing's 120dB range means that when you're ~110dB down, you can still recognize it as music. That's due to our ear being a spectrum analyzer. When you have a digital reproduction system with 120dB of dynamic range, and are ~110dB down, you've got less than 3 bits of resolution, and it sounds like crap since there is all that quantization noise that's only 10dB below from your music.

    6. Re:classical music is defective by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Any decent car stereo has a "loudness" button. This reduces the dynamic range.

    7. Re:classical music is defective by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of the Mozart that I've ever heard has a fairly small dynamic range. He seemed to rely on weaving together patterns of notes. You'll generally see more of that with Beethoven and some of the others.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    8. Re:classical music is defective by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The problem he may be having is that that works in a concert hall or a quiet room, but if you have any kind of noise floor in the room, then to get to the quiet parts of some songs you will have to put the gain up such that the loud parts are, in fact, too loud.

      I blame the playback devices, though. There ought to be a knob so you can set the floor and ceiling, or alternately, gain and offset, of the audio output to deal with environmental noise.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:classical music is defective by danlip · · Score: 1

      The dynamic range of human hearing is 120dB, the theoretical CD dynamic range is 96dB, tape and records have lower dynamic range and CDs usually are recorded with lower dynamic range too, so it shouldn't hurt your ears.

      120 dB is where damage starts to occur from short term exposure, but some people may feel pain at much lower levels. 85 dB can cause damage over long term and is the OSHA limit for long term occupational exposure (with 0 dB defined as the minimum humans can hear in this case, dB is the logarithm of a ratio and the zero point can be arbitrarily defined).

      But I agree that modern recordings are way over-compressed and having a wide dynamic range is good.

    10. Re:classical music is defective by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in most stereos the loudness button has no effect on dynamic range.

      Instead it boosts the low and high ranges to make up for the Taylor-Munsen curve.

      At low volumes, your ear/brain does not perceive low and high frequencies, so you won't hear them if you turn down your stereo. The loudness button is designed to make quietly-played music more accurately-reproduced.

      Now, some better car stereos have true dynamic range compression, but I'd say they are the exception. You won't find it on anything that came with the car (except for very deluxe cars), or just about anything that cost you less than $200.

    11. Re:classical music is defective by srleffler · · Score: 1

      The quiet parts are supposed to be quiet, but they are also supposed to be listened to in a theatre with good acoustics and a completely silent audience. If you've ever sat in a symphony performance with someone nearby moving around you'll know how much even a small amount of background noise interferes with the quiet parts of the music. When listening to the music on CD, one often just doesn't have a quiet enough background to appreciate the quiet parts at their intended volume.

    12. Re:classical music is defective by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Not a defect; music with a wide dynamic range was designed to be played in a perfectly quiet hall. Unfortunately, most of the listening environments today (e.g. while driving in your car) have a high level of background noise, which makes them better suited to Lady Gaga than Bach. Personally, if they were playing good recordings of Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D minor, Tchaikovsky's 1812 overture, or almost anything by Beethoven, it would attract rather than repel me. I grew up being forcibly subjected to Country music; despite the fact that I am quite familiar with it, I'm really not a fan of it now (with a few notable exceptions like Tim O'Brian, Allison Krause, and Emmylou Harris, artists that in no way restrict themselves to just the "Country" gendre). So yes, I do think conditioning youth to have an aversion to great classical music is a sin.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    13. Re:classical music is defective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe listening to loud music damaged his hearing and he cannot hear the details of the low parts anymore. So he cranks it up.

      I was told very early I had an excellent hearing and was always very careful to keep it that way. My CD-player outputs to both a solid-state amp (Denon) and a tube amp and about half my friends cannot hear the difference, that is obvious to others, mostly in the voice, flute violins, Jazz and numerous clasic rock.

    14. Re:classical music is defective by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      You've overshot by a bit. 24 bits is 146 dB, so if you set the ceiling at the threshold of pain (+120 dB), the low end is 26 dB below the threshold of hearing and almost as much below the noise level of air. Even allowing for the fact that noise added to a tone might allow you to detect a tone 10 dB below the threshold of hearing, we're still only talking about 21 bits from detection to pain.

      Practically speaking, when it's so quiet that you're struggling to hear anything, the fact that quantization is creating distortion is irrelevant. As long as the dynamic range is properly centered, anything over 20 bits is wasted.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    15. Re:classical music is defective by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      The dynamic range of human hearing is 120dB

      Yeah, if you play sounds at 120 dB...

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    16. Re:classical music is defective by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      The dynamic range of human hearing is 120dB, the theoretical CD dynamic range is 96dB, tape and records have lower dynamic range and CDs usually are recorded with lower dynamic range too, so it shouldn't hurt your ears.

      Unfortunately, driving a car (especially a 140k mile one like mine), adds a noise floor with magnitude ~60-70 dB, meaning that the SNR for the quiet parts of the music is often less than 0 dB. Though I understand that some people have the ability to do so, I cannot decipher audio inputs with such a low SNR, regardless of the specific frequency components of the music.

      Though I very much enjoy symphonic and orchestral music (though I am more into modern and romantic than classical), there is no way I can get a half decent experience of the piece if it was recorded with wide dynamic range, which is so often the case.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    17. Re:classical music is defective by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Though I very much enjoy symphonic and orchestral music (though I am more into modern and romantic than classical), there is no way I can get a half decent experience of the piece if it was recorded with wide dynamic range, which is so often the case.

      In which case you should get a car stereo that has integrated compressor or rip the cd and make a compressed version. Both options are doable. If, however, the studio releases the CD already compressed, there is no way I can restore the dynamic range.

      Movies got it right. Movies are released with high dynamic range soundtracks, but all AC3 decoders have an option of compression (they call it "night mode" IIRC).

    18. Re:classical music is defective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local AM college station played some Handel the other day, and I'll tell you:

      classical music never sounded so good in the car. Every car stereo should have a built-in compressor like they have on AM radio.....

      Dynamic range is great when 70% of it isn't obliterated by road noise!

    19. Re:classical music is defective by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      or rip the cd and make a compressed version.

      That's a great idea... any suggestions on software with which to do that?

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    20. Re:classical music is defective by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if there's any software that can do this automatically, but you can rip the CD with EAC and compress the audio with Audacity (Effect->Compressor).

  37. Look at Venezuela by frenchbedroom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Compare this to what they do in Venezuela... teaching classical music to poor kids from the ghettos.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Sistema

  38. Unintended consequences by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If being put in a room by myself with hours of Mozart was a punishment, my teacher's pet self would quite likely have started causing problems.

    I wonder if, to counter that, they would have the same consequence be a punishment to one kid and a reward to another.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:Unintended consequences by fishexe · · Score: 1

      If being put in a room by myself with hours of Mozart was a punishment, my teacher's pet self would quite likely have started causing problems.

      And if the Mozart effect is real, I would have caused even more problems to improve my grades.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  39. Tooting Bec, London, UK. by micronicos · · Score: 1

    Tooting Bec is my local underground station in South London and they have been playing classical music in the foyer / ticket hall for several years.

    The sound quality is good. The volume level is reasonable.

    I asked one of the staff whether he enjoyed the music and he said 'some of it' & he also said that it kept young people from loitering.

    Next time I will try and find out more on London Underground (a part of Transport for London) policies on noise and social exclusion.

    Personally I enjoy the few seconds of classical music I hear as I stroll down to the escalators.

    --
    Nico M, London, GB.
  40. Does not work. by NorQue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been living in a flat at a park near a train station (Bielefeld, Germany, if anyone cares) for over a year. All kinds of shady people hung out there day in and day out, drinking tons of alcohol, taking drugs, on sunny days it must've been 150 people and still around 10-20 regulars when it rained. Worst thing, when it rained they used to hang directly before my house because it had a small porch, with the result of having one or two of those dunkards stumble into my house each time I opened the front door because they leaned against it. Well, annoying, but I didn't pay too much and the proximity to everything in inner city was excellent (it basically was at the midst of inner city), so I didn't care.

    One day the town officials decided that it would be a *great* idea to shun away the bums with classic music, so they played Beethoven's Für Elise in an infinite loop. Worst. Idea. Ever. The drunks didn't care at all, nothing in their numbers changed, they even seemed to like it. On a lot of occasions one could hear them loudly bawling the piano refrain melody of the song, but even more of the time you would just see them standing there, eyes all empty and being heavily drugged. They just did not care. I, on the other hand, got pretty annoyed after a few weeks. Even today I can't stand the Für Elise melody, pretty bad, considering it's one of his most popular works. I assume the only people annoyed by that were the sober people who had to pass there every day to go to work, shop, et cetera.

    1. Re:Does not work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Für Elise

      I've hated that piece of shit ever since they started including it years ago as one of the supplied ring tones -- and people actually selected it. Same with the well-known bars of Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, which gets trotted out every time some TV ad-monger wants to say, "See how sophisticated I can be!"

    2. Re:Does not work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually working in the UK. Especially at bus stops where you would previously get a large number of kids congregating (apparently bus stops are the new place to be seen) and it was very intimidating for a lot of people.

      Since they've started playing this music it doesn't really happen anymore but thats because it was designed to deter youths rather than older drunken folk, so I think in your case it didn't work because the target audience wasn't right.

    3. Re:Does not work. by ascari · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course it doesn't work. Nobody can tolerate Muzak, but people haven't stopped riding elevators. Nobody likes low-budget covers of old beatles songs or barry manilow, but we still shop at grocery stores. We still stay on hold on phones in spite of the "music". Why? Because our brains know how to tune out things that are distracting and irrelevant to the primary motivation of the moment. The only reason this scheme "works" in isolated cases like TFA suggests is that it was presented to the "victims" as a form of punishment or deterrent. Kind of like a placebo effect.

    4. Re:Does not work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Bielefeld, Germany, if anyone cares)

      Of course we do. How else would we know that the entire post is fiction?

    5. Re:Does not work. by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you (or anybody having to wait for the bus for more than a minute) take a baseball bat / pickax / bullet / squirt gun filled with glue onto the loudspeaker ? I definitely would to had if I was in that situation, fortunately I live in a country that respects its citizens a bit more.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    6. Re:Does not work. by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Even today I can't stand the Für Elise melody...

      I can hardly stand that melody myself, and that's just because of an annoying association with a 20yr old McDonald's commercial of a piano recital.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    7. Re:Does not work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to tell the same story - my friends from Bielefeld took me there once, and even after a few minutes it gets boring. I can't even imagine weeks of such a treatment. I do sympathize.

    8. Re:Does not work. by NorQue · · Score: 1

      The speakers were pretty unreachable under the ceiling, next to the subway sign: http://i46.tinypic.com/atlsm0.jpg - believe me, I thought about that myself once or twice. I also went on a search to find the device where that music was played from, unsuccessfuly, unfortunately. Picture was taken after a football game, btw, usually there wasn't that much police around. ;)

    9. Re:Does not work. by fishexe · · Score: 1

      I've been living in a flat at a park near a train station (Bielefeld, Germany, if anyone cares) for over a year ... One day the town officials decided that it would be a *great* idea to shun away the bums with classic music, so they played Beethoven's Für Elise in an infinite loop....

      Well of COURSE that won't work there, Beethoven was German! They should have used some Bizet or Gounod.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    10. Re:Does not work. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      They should have loaded an iPod with a lot of different types of classical music, put it on the standard iPod dock with audio out to connect to the speaker system and with built-in recharging, and hit the Play button. Playing "Fuer Elise" repeatedly is one thing, but playing a wide selection of classical music from Monteverdi to Shostakovich is quite something else.

  41. They tried this already... by Cassander · · Score: 2, Funny

    In my home town, about 10+ years ago, they tried the same tactic to get rid of the teenagers that were eternally hanging out in the town square. Trouble was, the teenagers in question were mostly goth/vampire types and they actually liked the classical music. It still makes me laugh...

    --
    Knowledge != Intelligence
    1. Re:They tried this already... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      In my home town, about 10+ years ago, they tried the same tactic to get rid of the teenagers that were eternally hanging out in the town square. Trouble was, the teenagers in question were mostly goth/vampire types and they actually liked the classical music. It still makes me laugh...

      The problem is they didn't understand how something like this works. It doesn't "drive people away", it just makes them less likely to commit crimes. Those who were there intent on committing crimes, move elsewhere. Those who were there just hanging out are unaffected, except that they are less likely to commit a crime on a whim. I suspect that the reason it "failed" in your town is because they were trying to fix a "problem" that wasn't. Teenagers hanging out aren't in and of themselves a problem. However, teenagers hanging out often times start committing crimes (vandalism, petty theft, minor assault) out of boredom, or at the instigation of a few problem individuals. Studies have shown that keeping an area clean, well-lit and in good repair decreases the likelihood of people committing such crimes and encourages those intent on petty crime to go elsewhere.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  42. I find Mozart unbearable by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

    and I've never been subjected to it in detention. Maybe its the Mozart. They should try playing Bach and see if they get the same result.

    Yeah I understand that reasonable people can like Mozart. I just don't find it very appealing myself, except for the first fifteen minutes or so of his requiem, the part he wrote.

  43. Clockwork Orange repeat? by piotru · · Score: 1

    As in title

  44. No, the problem is the limitation of speakers by George_Ou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Classical music when live is even more dynamic than it is on the highest end speaker system. That's because you have 100 simultaneous devices generating sound and it is quite exhilarating whereas 100 instruments coming out of 2 speakers is garbled. The problem is that classical music e.g., 1812 Overture presents some extreme engineering challenges to sound systems in that it produces extreme clipping/distortion in just about any speaker system especially when the cannon go off.

  45. It's like shining sunlight on vampires by George_Ou · · Score: 1

    Feeding the kids "elevator music" is like shining sunlight on vampires, except it isn't so much that they're offended by the music or sounds but rather the association with old people. When they become "old people" themselves, they get over it. I hated watching ice skating and dancing as a boy and loved the A-team. By the time I got to my late teens, I couldn't stand the A-team (or shows like it) and I began to love artistic things and plays with more plot. The point is that people change dramatically as they mature.

    1. Re:It's like shining sunlight on vampires by plastbox · · Score: 1

      Congrats on coming out of the closet! It's not an easy thing to do, least of all when you're young!

      Seriously though.. People generally don't change much beyond what is needed to get by. I'm nearly half-way to 50 and I still love me some A-Team, MacGyver, and whatever else I watched 10 years ago. The things that have changed is a growing ability to do boring shit I don't like at all because I have to, and extending my diplomatic skill enough to eventually land me in a relationship I'll be able to stay in long enough to have kids.

      I'm always going to love my childhood/teenage favorites. I might change, but I'll still force my kids to watch the Rocky, Rambo, Alien(s) and Terminator movies with me, and MacGyver on dvd/bluray/whatever will have it's place of honor in my living-/mediaroom!

  46. mp3 players? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Most youth are constantly listening to blaring music from head phones anyways, to the extent that I doubt that they could hear any music outside playing at a reasonable sound lvl.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  47. Original source? by fugaz · · Score: 1

    What about linking the orginal source instead?

  48. Kids know classical music by benwiggy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard one youth on a London bus recently, encouraging his friend to play out loud some trip-hop piece with violins and a drumbeat. "They can't tell you to turn it off, because it's Classic, innit?"

    But I don't think this is much to worry about. How many of us have instantly hated the music of our fathers when teenagers, only to discover its charms later in life?

  49. the question is by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    would you rather have graffiti, or screeching, loud, bad quality classical music. As an old geezer, I vote 2-

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  50. I knew I was doing something wrong... by doghouse41 · · Score: 1

    I knew it - those headaches are being caused by all the damn Mozart on my iPod.

    I'll get rid of it right away (not to mention the Chopin, Beethoven, Debussy and Schubert...)

  51. Consider the opposite by Squiff · · Score: 1

    No one seems to have considered the opposite- it's quite common to encounter shops with incredibly loud and tasteless music, clearly chosen by the bored staff. It seems to be generally clothing and shoe shops but my local supermarket has this too. I guess that there must be a whole generation over 30 who will never learn to appreciate 50 cent and Lady Gaga- I know that I try to reduce my own exposure to such 'unscheduled entertainments' as much as possible. The article is hysterical and highly misleading. I cannot speak for the school supposedly using Mozart as a 'punishment' but I do live and travel in London. It is quite common here for classical music to be played at tube ('subway') station entrance halls. The choice of music is generally 19th century waltzes and military marches. The sound volume makes it noticeable but not unbearable- you can hold a conversation over it. It's not at every station but it isn't rare. It does seem to cut down on the beggars and general hecklers that you would otherwise encounter.

  52. the classical score to your childhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Are you all forgetting that we've been hearing classical music as kids continuously? In cartoons, commercials, at fairs, in movies, etc. It's everywhere. It's been a form of social control for decades, but someone just now decided to put a speaker near a busstop and suddenly it's Big Brother screaming in your ear?

    Oh yes, and you're all way too indignant :D

  53. Heerlen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The city of Heerlen in the Netherlands has been doing this with great success for about 3 years now.

  54. They should be so lucky by naz404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These Brit hooligans should be thankful. At least they're not being subjected to Metallica. Oh the humanity!

    1. Re:They should be so lucky by fredc97 · · Score: 1

      I do hope they will enjoy it later on, it could have been Muzak after all.

    2. Re:They should be so lucky by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. They should have played St. Anger instead of the Black Album.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:They should be so lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure how exactly metalica can function as a deterrent for vandalism. Following your line of thought may I suggest Slayer instead?

      Raining blood
      From a lacerated sky
      Bleeding its horror
      Creating my structure
      Now I shall reign in blood!

      Ahhhh... this makes me want to just sit down and have a nice cup of tea with my grandma.

  55. They should try a new strategy. by Obel · · Score: 0

    Classical is too inoffensive. Maybe I should introduce these officials to Merzbow...

    Blasting Pulse Demon at bus stops and town centres at night is sure to keep away the youths. And the adults and old people.

    (Admittedly I'm just saying this because I'd love to walk down an empty town centre in the middle of the night hearing Merzbow everywhere)

    1. Re:They should try a new strategy. by plastbox · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I just have to pop by and point out how hilarious I find it when people go that far out of their way to be different and stand out. I know there are divides between generations. I know I am just 24 and still already despise everything the "kids these days" listen to (techno/trance/dance/whateverthehellitscalled/hip-hop, it's just machine beats and a woman moaning, or some black dude rapping about bling and the bitches he's fucked).

      Some things just aren't music. Pulse Demon.. man.. I don't even know what that is. Even Scooter sounds good compared to that. Even Norwegian Lene Alexandra's "My boobs are OK!" seems like great artistry! I might be missing out on a great joke here but rest assured that somewhere, someone is smoking weed/drinking, going on about how fucking fantastic Merzbow is and how anyone who doesn't "get it" just aren't smart enough, open enough, they're conformists, whatever imaginary bs lets said looser kids feel superior for a while.

      Sort of like whenever someone makes some completely retarded piece of "modern art", like a red circle on an otherwise huge, blank canvas, and goes around with their little possy of "art-knowers" looking down at everyone who dares point out that a red circle on a piece of canvas does not, in any damn way, constitute art. =P

      </rant>

    2. Re:They should try a new strategy. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      It's clearly music, in the same way that the red square in a box is art. However, it is a bit difficult to listen to, and a square in a box is a bit difficult to appreciate.

      Noise music can be much more interesting/clever: example.

      I sometimes like stuff like this when clubbing, but it's not something I'd listen to at home, it's just fun to dance to. If I'm really drunk (in the club) I'll go to the room where they play stuff like this, which I get bored of extremely quickly while sober.

      (At home I play stuff like this. People have played "superior" music to me, full of time signatures and so on, but it doesn't do anything for me. It's just different.)

    3. Re:They should try a new strategy. by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Sort of like whenever someone makes some completely retarded piece of "modern art", like a red circle on an otherwise huge, blank canvas, and goes around with their little possy of "art-knowers" looking down at everyone who dares point out that a red circle on a piece of canvas does not, in any damn way, constitute art. =P

      Maybe it's just me, but if someone can make money selling the flag of Japan to a museum you should probably rethink calling them retarded.

      Virg

  56. Indeed! by denzacar · · Score: 1
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  57. It doesn't work by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It moves the problem, it doesn't solve it.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:It doesn't work by fishexe · · Score: 1

      It moves the problem, it doesn't solve it.

      If you move it far enough, it is solved.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  58. Hardly new by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Informative

    They've bene using this in the UK for 7 or 8 years at least now. I used to live near a railway station that played classical music in the evenings to deter the drug dealers etc that were hanging around or the kids that trashed it most weeks.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Hardly new by slim · · Score: 1

      Where is this? I live in the UK and -- thankfully -- have never witnessed it.

      It may well deter yobs, but what's the value of that if it also deters *me*? I have a right to be there; maybe a *need* to be there. I really can't stand Vivaldi or Mozart.

      I could go for some Shostakovitch, but I suspect that would drive away other people with a perfect right to be there.

      On a related note -- I'm 36 and can still hear 'mosquito' pitches. So don't use them to deter youths either.

      And what about the law abiding youths who have a perfect right to be there?

    2. Re:Hardly new by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Informative

      This was in Essex. It's been widely reported over the years as a technique being used. TBH there's something slightly wierd about being in a train station late at night wondering if some freak's going to jump out and stab you but with a nice soothing background.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    3. Re:Hardly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about the law abiding youths who have a perfect right to be there?

      Sorry, but our Government doesn't recognise that term - I think you mean 'Potential Criminals'.

    4. Re:Hardly new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they should play the Dies Irae from Mozart's Requiem in D minor (K. 626). Sounds like an appropriate soundtrack for such an ominous scene...

  59. New Labour scummus scummorum by dugeen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trust New Labour to turn Art into a means of oppression.

  60. Re: almost a haiku... by neonsignal · · Score: 2, Funny

    groups of retirees
    loitering around bus stops
    Vivaldi's bullies

  61. 1984 became overused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had to look somewhere else for inspiration... Clockwork Orange was proposed by the hip edgy group as the new 1984.

  62. PS: by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Britva" means "razor".

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  63. Re:Mozart by tronkel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they showed a video of Renee Fleming (or Anna Netrebko)singing Mozart opera, the yobs would have to be forcibly moved on by the police. She (Renee)is the most beautiful opera diva in the world. Go look in YouTube if you don't believe me. Mozart a punishment? - hardly. If these yobs are repelled by Mozart then I fear for the next generation of Brits. I live in Vienna Austria now - not 5 mins. walk away from where Wolferl Mozart wrote The Marriage of Figaro. Get a life you uneducated british generation.

  64. dangerous message? by shiba_mac · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "The dangerous message being sent to young people is clear: 1) you are scum; 2) classical music is not a wonder of the human world, it's a repellent against mildly anti-social behavior."

    If (2) you find classical music repellent, then (1) you _are_ scum.

  65. I'll call bull on that, sorry by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    I've heard the "we're listening/doing X because it's really nice/right/good, they're listening/doing Y just for some juvenile cool factor" rationalizations before, and it seems to me one of the silliest things ever.

    For a start, I'm way beyond the age groups these guys are trying to drive off, but I not only am not fond of classcial music, but value a bit of peace and quiet too. Any place blaring that crap and disturbing the peace, would lose my business pretty fast, if I have the choice. Mom is even older (unsurprisingly) and is a die-hard heavy-metal fangirl. Much to dad's despair, I might add.

    The idea that a little old lady would listen to that just because of some "cool factor" is hillarious. Cool factor among whom? It's not like she hands around highschools or anything.

    And that goes double for such crap as "When you grow up, you hopefully realize that is pretty stupid, and can enjoy it." Really? Exactly at what age will she count as grown up, then?

    Plus, may I point out that most of that music which is "classical" now, was once the avantgarde thing that shocked the elders of the day? Are you aware that Mozart, who now is used to deterr the youth from being there, once was pretty much the equivalent of punk and wrote such shock pieces as "Lick Me In The Arse" and "Lick Me In The Arse Really Nice And Clean"? Now that ought to have gotten a few proper old ladies ranting about the decadence of youth and their music these days.

    Are you aware that complaints about "today's youth" and pretty much a verbatim rehash of all the "cool" stereotypes about them, can be found as early as Socrates or Hesiod in the 8'th century BC?

    "I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on
    the frivolous youth of today, for certainly all youth are reckless
    beyond words. When I was a boy, we were taught to be discrete and respectful of
    elders, but the present youth are exceedingly wise and impatient of
    restraint.
    " -- Hesiod

    Supposedly there is even a similar complaint dating from early Sumer on clay tablets.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I'll call bull on that, sorry by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot.

      I'm sorry, but you should know.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    2. Re:I'll call bull on that, sorry by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a quick note - Mozart never published the "Lick Me In the Arse" piece while he was alive. He widow sent a manuscript to a publisher, which "cleaned up" the lyrics prior to publishing. And the "Lick Me In the Arse Nice and Clean" piece is no longer believed to have been written by Mozart. A quick trip to Wikipedia would have revealed this. Sort of undercuts your argument a bit. Mozart may have been rebellious in certain ways, but it was hard to be so egregious and be successful in an era when you required patronage and support from the upper echelons of society to make it as an artist.

    3. Re:I'll call bull on that, sorry by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

      Plus, may I point out that most of that music which is "classical" now, was once the avantgarde thing that shocked the elders of the day? Are you aware that Mozart, who now is used to deterr the youth from being there, once was pretty much the equivalent of punk and wrote such shock pieces as "Lick Me In The Arse" and "Lick Me In The Arse Really Nice And Clean"? Now that ought to have gotten a few proper old ladies ranting about the decadence of youth and their music these days.

      Are you aware that complaints about "today's youth" and pretty much a verbatim rehash of all the "cool" stereotypes about them, can be found as early as Socrates or Hesiod in the 8'th century BC?

      Wow. Just wow. Mozart really did write a song called Lick Me in the Arse. I had absolutely no idea.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
  66. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this retro story week or something? This is old news. Boring.

    Any chance of any current \ cutting edge stories this week?

  67. It hurts their brain by VShael · · Score: 1

    I genuinely think it causes them pain(*). I'd be greatly interested in any study which looked into this, if there was one.

    (* Like physical exercise to an underused muscle.)

  68. RickRollover Beethoven by jazcap · · Score: 1

    ...tell Tchaikovsky the news. Send more Chuck Berry.

  69. "Urban" culture by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the issue here is that most normal people despise "urban" culture, and the thoroughly unoriginal kids who ape black American criminals in their tastes of dress and music. It doesn't help that affinity for "urban" culture, is a cultural shibboleth -- given that the underclasses gravitate towards junk culture (and junk food), it's easy to discriminate against them by pushing urban culture out of public spaces.

    I've seen all sorts of devices designed to move these kind of people on. Pink lights in subways. Classical music. The notorious "mosquito" (high-pitched sound generators that only teenagers can hear). Barry Manilow.

    FWIW, I'm broadly in favour of just playing lots of Barry Manilow rather than classical music... same advantages, none of the drawbacks.

  70. No, they don't by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    They just play classical music, properly over fairly decent speakers.

    Oh and what are you for assuming?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  71. Always loved that by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can talk about classical music to kids until you are blue in the face, but "when the cannon goes off" tends to be the seller :P

    Oh, proper musical experts might scoff at it, but it sells the stuff to the crowd, and who knows, they might sit through the rest because of it. It also makes death metal seem tame. Biting the head of a chicken vs artillery.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  72. On a scale of one to ten, thats dystopian. by Neuromonger · · Score: 1

    This may be the most idiotic thing I've read about on slashdot(and I read it every day). The article seems to recognize that students and teachers are divided by a generational gap, and that this divide is paralleled by a differentiation in musical preference, which is also a generational gap. It seems dumbfounding to me that rather than causing these two demographics to integrate as a solution, they've caused them to become more alien to one another. I suppose that problem will go away when all the "old people" die off. If young people hate school and just want to get drunk at parties, and old people want to listen to Mozart, looks like they've ruined their chance of getting drunk and partying to Mozart together, which would be my solution.

  73. This is used to chase away prostitutes in Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One entrance to Copenhagen central station has had loud classical music played there for years. The reason is that it faces a street famous for having a lot of prostitutes. To avoid having the prostitutes solicit their services in or near the entrance the officials of the station mounted speakers to play classical music round the clock.

  74. Understand, it's Britain by bytesex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A lot of people here argue that somehow, people will be people, young and old, and if you're going to ruin it for them now, you'll have ruined it for them forever. A lot of this commentary is made from the preconception that the youths targeted here are of the sort that will eventually land on their feet, live in the adult world, and be responsible citizens. I would like to point out (much in contrast with my own ideas on how society ought to function) that this is Britain we're talking about. I know this is difficult to imagine for someone not from the Perfid Albion itself, but there you have it. So no, these youngsters aren't innocent, just a bit under-educated little angels otherwise full of promise - these are wilfully malevolent, purposely stupid little monsters, only good for the dole and the pub. They will not have a job that pays taxes in their lives and they will probably die from something crime-, smoke- or alcohol-related. Sure, someone let them down along the way: their parents, the government, their infrastructure, whatever, but by the time that these boys start hanging out on street-corners, it's already way to late to do anything about it. They're a lost cause, and they know it, and the people who play classical music in order to get rid of them, know it. So stop arguing like they're being treated too harshly - if you want them treated with a pussy-glove, it should have been done years, years ago. Considering the alternatives, playing classical music to them *is* treating them softly.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Understand, it's Britain by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      They will not have a job that pays taxes in their lives and they will probably die from something crime-, smoke- or alcohol-related. Sure, someone let them down along the way: their parents, the government, their infrastructure, whatever, but by the time that these boys start hanging out on street-corners, it's already way to late to do anything about it. They're a lost cause, and they know it, and the people who play classical music in order to get rid of them, know it.

      Yeah. It's the British version of autogenocide

      And it's the reason the world sucks in this particular manner.

      -FL

    2. Re:Understand, it's Britain by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      So if I read you correctly, being born in the wrong part of town and you are a 'lost cause'?

      Here is a wild idea: Instead of wasting time and money with all the Orwellian crap actually spend the money to help them out of their little dirt-pit?

      But that would mean your children might come in contact with 'them', huh?

    3. Re:Understand, it's Britain by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a self fulfilling prophesy to me.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Understand, it's Britain by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Now there was a paranoid ranting screed. I read most of it, but finally started skimming it. I no longer had to read it because I've heard it all before. I have an ex-girlfriend who was like her: old overweight undereducated radical feminist.

      There is a grain of truth in rants like that, but only a grain. Yes there is societal pressure against segments of society by other segments of society, but this tendency to ascribe malice aforethought to that pressure is symptomatic of poor education and very muddy thinking. It is true that conservative think-tanks generate bogus studies for the purpose of shoring up agenda-driven speeches, but her attempt to explain why is pure fantasy. I'm quite sure she'd never been in a country club in her life, so her attempt to characterize the interplay of the wealthy is nothing but ill-informed speculation.

      I have had repeated, regular contact with the CEO of the company I work for, and he's almost a caricature of the old white rich male good old boy networked patriarch that she was ranting about. And I can tell you with absolute certainty that the hierarchy of such people she fantasizes about does not exist. The people who are driven to seek power and wealth at all costs are often sociopaths, but more, they are always extremely arrogant. They do not submit to the will of others of their type. She ascribes very female motives and organization to a sub-culture that is entirely, even rabidly, male. They do not all march in the same direction, they do not issue veiled orders to one another, they do not even get along very well.

      I have also had occasional contact with the majority owner of the company I work for, and while he's superficially similar to the CEO (old white rich and male), in other respects he's entirely different. One, he's substantially richer than the CEO. Two, he is in truth a self-made man. He did not come from a wealthy background, he does not have the "right" parents, and he does not exhibit the drive to seek power for power's sake or wealth for wealth's sake that the CEO does. He was a carpenter, he's missing some fingers from one hand after an accident with a power saw, and he was in the right place at the right time (California's real estate boom starting 40 years ago) and knew enough to parlay serendipity into success. He's fabulously wealthy by her standards and quite wealthy even by my upper middle class standards and... there is no agenda. He runs his construction company the same way he always has. When he thinks he can make money doing a development, he spends the money and takes the risk. When he thinks he'll lose money, he doesn't take the risk. Simple as that. There was no spoken from on high marching orders to denigrate women and minorities, nor would he follow them if there were. A large fraction of his workforce is Latino. This does not make him some sort of equal opportunity crusader, either. It's just a southern California company and that's the kind of labor he can get.

      Aside from all that, she decries the system that fails to "provide" jobs for everybody. It doesn't work that way. First, because all of the people she's talking about who needed jobs don't know anything particularly valuable. If I was in a position to hire people, I would be wanting particular skills, and most of those people not only don't have them, but can't get them. Some of it is for lack of opportunity, but much of it is lack of both interest and capability. I have a sneaking suspicion she fell into that category herself, most of the time. I know damn well Britain's unruly youth fall into that category.

      Second, the American Dream (up in lights, with music) isn't about having a job. Having a job is having the opportunity to make someone else rich. Wanting a job is wanting to not have to worry, to not have to think, to not have to make hard decisions (or indeed, any decisions at all). That's NOT the American Dream. The American Dream is having the opportunity to work for yourself, to do what you want and get paid for it.

    5. Re:Understand, it's Britain by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Try to read a little more critically. Believing everything somebody like that writes is almost as bad as believing everything the Discovery Institute writes.

      I always read critically, thanks, but it certainly doesn't hurt to be reminded every now and again.

      Your opinion, for instance, cannot be taken at face value for the same reason the author of that blog post cannot be taken at face value. The reader, (me in this case), must think on his feet and measure both items as best he can.

      To start with, the author of that blog post does indeed sound a bit hysterical at points, and you tripped over the same aspects of her post that I did. (The secret coded system of looks and glances at the country club, being one such instance.) However, the I was able to forgive that extravagance, partly because I recognized it for what it was; an emblematic example designed to portray a very real social force. Unspoken rules of behavior are entirely real, as I am sure you are aware, and they do cause populations to make significant shifts between opposing poles when certain critical masses are achieved.

      I've observed that force in action all through my life in every imaginable arena, from highschool to work places, to national debate, to simple things like fashion choices. It's called, "Culture", and the truth is that nearly all of our fundamental behavior is in fact NOT learned through direct verbal instruction. Her point about Hitler not actually having issued orders to carry out the darker elements of the Nazi reign is very valid. And while it is true that the dynamics of the unspoken rule-sets of humans can be deliberately manipulated. (Billions of dollars have been spent on advertising and public relations. Precise psychology and brain science has evolved to the point where entire populations can be very effectively managed with deliberate strokes.), I don't think that one necessarily needs the men near the top to even be aware that they are deliberately pushing a destruct button. Such people are running on automatic themselves. But that doesn't mean the system they are a part of doesn't exist or that it doesn't function in much the way she described.

      Here's the difference I see between your opinion and hers. . . She was looking at objective reality and made a concerted effort to build a functioning model which would explain her observations. And while I realize that you were limited to a fifteen minute Slashdot response, you seemed instead to offer only critical objections rather than a alternative model to explain those same observations. You seemed to center your opinion around the example of one man, the owner of what sounds like a modestly-sized construction company. You'll have to forgive me for pointing out that I don't think such men are really the ones calling the kinds of shots which matter in the system Martha Rose Crow was describing. High level banking, infrastructure, food and drug regulation, education, social and military spending directives are where the patterns of a nation are determined. Guys like your construction CEO friend are just little men who have to function within the resulting system.

      In any case, to base your argument for how reality works on such a single and somewhat irrelevant example isn't trust-inspiring. A wider sample is needed. For instance, while I also know some benign men of power, I've also had the opportunity to know others who are not benign. I've also known a number of journalists working in both television and newspaper media, and I've heard some private rants about how they are not allowed to tell the real news due to corruption in their organizations. Such examples tell a very different story than the one you are telling.

      But moreover, and this is the part I find which leaves your opinion lacking, is that you seem to sum things up with the attitude that, sure society is messed up, but it's okay to blame the kids even though you point out that the system was responsible for their creation. This s

    6. Re:Understand, it's Britain by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I see you're right. I didn't actually state my own counter-thesis. I contradicted hers and jumped straight into counter-examples (comparing and contrasting two different men, by the way), without actually explicitly stating my own explanation for what she sees as designed and intentional. Then I went on to criticize the subtext of her editorial, still without a counter.

      My own thesis is this: The characteristics of society that she sees as designed are not designed - they are emergent phenomena. Not only are they emergent phenomena, they are only poorly understood (certainly by me, and judging by the literature, nearly everyone else as well), and judging by history, they are unstable. I don't think it can be characterized as a malicious system because despite the unquestioned presence of malicious people, no one designed the system. It evolved, it continues to evolve, and it does not behave predictably. If it was predictable, the advertising industry you cite would have already converged on Brawndo for everything, without a peep of dissent. Population management (as in convincing them what to do, not changing their numbers) is not nearly as effective as you portray either. The science fiction novel "Rainbow's End" by Vernor Vinge is illustrative; nobody yet has a YGBM (Steve Jobs' reality distortion field to the contrary).

      The point that I was trying to make in support of that thesis was that rich people do not form a cohesive monolithic malicious conspiracy. My examples served to demonstrate it by citing a positive proof: I can name one rich person who manifestly does not participate in any such thing. I also did him a disservice by understating his wealth. He owns an ocean going vessel, collects classic cars on Jay Leno's scale, and owns one of the major buildings Yahoo leases, among many other properties. His "modest" construction company builds things on a scale you would characterize as infrastructure. The diamonds his wife wears informally verge on ostentatious. I can only imagine what her formalwear is like. Oh, and the company he owns that I work for is a military contracting company. (Incidentally, many military spending directives are issued by some very small men indeed. Classic civil servants. Some of them make less money than I do.) The point being, I would expect he qualifies for membership in the monolithic conspiracy, should there be one.

      In 6 years of working for one of his companies, I have seen no signs that he is managing things with an eye towards the genocide Ms. Crow was so afraid of. Quite the opposite. Company policy is to avoid the hiring and firing cycles other military contractors have been subject to since the days when Eisenhower first decried the rise of the military industrial complex. Fully half of the employees are non-white. With policies like that, I fail to see Ms. Crow's frightening conspiracy seeking to kill off a large segment of society.

      I'll go further and challenge your list of pattern sources. Education directives are produced locally. Slashdot's own stories provide many fine examples of how wildly such directives differ. Lower Merion tries to defend invasive spying while hundreds of other districts don't even have laptops, let alone Orwellian notions of privacy.

      Infrastructure decisions are also very local affairs. The county I live in is blessed with a county executive who is reasonably honest and effective. The roads are in good repair and notable improvements are made every summer. The county my parents live in (in another state) is so poorly managed that they still live on a dirt road and can't get cable or piped natural gas, despite living barely a thousand yards away from the presence of all three. I buy my electricity from a cooperative. My coworkers buy from a for-profit company. I pay a fraction what they do.

      Social spending decisions, with the exceptions of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, are made at either the state or local level, with some overlap. Another of my ex-girlfriends

    7. Re:Understand, it's Britain by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      So if I read you correctly, being born in the wrong part of town and you are a 'lost cause'?

      I read him that if you were born in the wrong part of town and didn't get out of it before your age of majority you were a lost cause. And I mean "get out of it" in a loose sense. Good grades, an artistic calling, an apprenticeship, whatever.

      I cannot say I disagree. That could well be the definition of a lost cause: Potential that never did materialize and now never can.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  75. And the next generation.. by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 1

    and the next generation will find that Classical music is stimulating because there isn't the riff-raff at those locations...

  76. Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    General social mores in the United States may give you 'fascist right-wing wackos', but they also give you kids who aren't feral.

    Hardly. Vast swathes of the south side of Chicago, Eastern LA, Salt Lake City, Baltimore, Washington D.C., Miami, New York, Philadelphia, etc. etc. have "ferel youth" running rampent. The middle class doesn't acknowledge this as they are safely tucked away in their gated communities, but anyone who has lived downtown knows this, even without seeing newscasts of this or that drive-by shooting.

    And that doesn't even begin to touch the spate of school and university killings in the middle and upper class campuses that have blighted the US, usually in the heart of these so-called "moral" communities you talk about (and the so-called "gun rights" they support).

    I do prefer the government in the UK over that of the US (the country is, by and large, more governable, and better governed, than the US) ... but the country here is by no means perfect, and out-of-control youth are a big problem. Too many of them watching the wire and trying to mimic American kids they think are cool, perhaps. What is telling is that they have found an effective, non-violent solution to the problem (playing classical music), and folks are comparing it to the Marquis de Sade for crying out loud -- probably some of the same folks who would favour calling in the police to crack heads if it were happening on their side of the pond, or in their neighbourhood. And then go to church on Sunday and expound on America's "moral superiority" while decrying any kind of sane healthcare system and lamenting the current administration's reversal on the use of torture against "foreign combatants."

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      Reread that sentence. He didn't say anything about "morals," he said "mores" which is an entirely different word. Not saying you don't have an argument, but I think you are mis-targeting a bit.

    2. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is nonsense, at least with respect to New York. I live in New York and have for years, so I can speak with some authority about it.

      We used to have groups of "feral youth" back in the 90s, when I recall friends of mine getting mugged and beaten up. But then a funny thing happened. The cops started taking this shit seriously. I was in college (around '99 or '00) when two friends who went to Dartmouth College were walking through Riverdale (the nice northern part of the Bronx) to one of their apartments, and they were jumped and mugged by 5 or 6 14 or 15 year old kids, beaten in their faces and their wallets stolen. And they called a friend and they called the cops. The friend pulled up with his car, and they chased down those fucking kids with the cops on the phone, and the cops showed up in a few minutes and caught the kids (or at least a few of them, who ratted the rest out).

      Those kids all went to jail and did several years in juvenile detention. Five years earlier, the cops would just not have cared.

      And in recent years I haven't seen this kind of shit any more. Because we enforce laws of public order in New York now. Maybe not in the ghetto of the South Bronx, or in parts of Brooklyn, but by and large, the parts of New York that a regular person would frequent are safe from this sort of crime these days.

      And no, I don't live in a gated community. Nobody in New York does, though we do have doormen in our apartment buildings. I live in downtown Manhattan, and have lived either here or the Upper West Side of Manhattan for years now.

      We all share this city, that's why we take public order fucking seriously here. We basically don't have drive-by shootings (wouldn't really make sense to drive-by an apartment building and shoot anyway), and shooting murders are so rare now that there's usually an article in the newspaper when they happen in Manhattan.

      Seriously - the island of Manhattan, the heart of New York City, had 58 murders in 2009. NYC as a whole had something like 460 murders (half of those apparently in Brooklyn). This is with a population of something like 8.5 million! Back around 1990 that number was well over 2000 every year. Violent crime in general has dropped a similar amount here.

      So yeah, back in 1990, we did have bands of feral youth wandering around, killing and maiming and stealing with impunity. This just isn't the case any more.

    3. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Playing music isn't a solution to their problem at all.

      It's like saying "We had a rabid wolf problem in this town, so we caught them and dumped them in another town. Problem solved!"

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    4. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm missing something in your argument against "fascist right-wing wackos" when you list Chicago, Eastern LA, Baltimore, Washington D.C., Miami, New York, Philadelphia because those are *hardcore* blue state, Leftist enclaves with decades, even generations of that kind of thinking running those metro areas.

      How are they not models of social paradise after decades of left-wing policy making?

    5. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Vast swathes of the south side of Chicago,

      Actually most of the south side is working class to middle class and pretty safe. The west side has the worst slums in Chicago. I don't know why people always pick on the south side.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    6. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by cynical+kane · · Score: 1

      I live in downtown Chicago, and I feel safe anywhere at any time.

      But I've also lived in the South Side. There are certainly bad neighboorhoods, but for the most part they keep to themselves. The place I lived in, Hyde Park, was not the world's safest place, but it's nothing like the stories I hear about the UK, with gangs of unruly youth roaming around causing trouble. For the most part, if you didn't trouble trouble, trouble wouldn't trouble you.

      Also, you misspelled "feral".

    7. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the cities you cited are both poor, and very liberal. 'Hardly right-wing wackos that are causing the problems.

    8. Re:Moral doesn't mean what you think it means by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      while decrying any kind of sane healthcare system

      Judging by the rest of your post, you are referring to governmental "healthcare". Removing the obfuscation, you are promoting stealing from the healthy and productive to pay for the self-induced illnesses of the obese, smoking, lazy, unemployable winos.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  77. History repeats itself by fortapocalypse · · Score: 1

    Many here may not remember, but years ago Muzak was played on elevators. Since then people associated Muzak with having to wait to get to your floor...

  78. They don't dislike classical music as such by tconnors · · Score: 1

    No, the youths are turned off crappy classical muzak played through shitty speakers. I hate it to. I always know when I'm in the far eastern suburbs of Melbourne when they play some horribly piped noise through horn speakers designed to mangle train announcements and not for high fidelity.

    When shops play similar, I make it my aim to get the hell away from such places. I assume they didn't want to sell me anything.

  79. Unity is overrated. by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    I'm awfully glad I'm a Beta, because I don't work so hard. And then we are much better than the Gammas and Deltas. Gammas are stupid. They all wear green

  80. It's about time the adults caught on... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kids have been doing this to adults ever since the invention of the transistor radio...

    1. Re:It's about time the adults caught on... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh I love this idea. I am putting up outside speakers right now. No more whippersnappers on my lawn!!!!

  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. Devaluing music by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

    It's awful. Music is supposed to be art, not a weapon. Where can I get a sound dampener?

  83. The remaining offenders are more skillful by SlappyBastard · · Score: 2, Informative

    The researchers also confirmed the existing data that classical music improve mental function, rendering the kids who could tolerate far better at committing mischief. The old tack on the teacher's seat has been replaced by pay-for-play extortion and grade inflation schemes where students deliberately throw the curve.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  84. it works by null8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live in Hamburg, Germany and we have had this feature on some Subway stations for some years now. It definately works, also against bums and junkies, but not against the pocket-thieves.

    1. Re:it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you don't live near one of the stations then.

  85. Re:The Year 1812, Festival Overture in E flat majo by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Gunpowder, treason and plot...

  86. Fixing the symptom, instead of the cause by master_p · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Politicians these days have no ideas on how to solve the enormous problems society has. They can only think of solutions that treat the symptoms and not the cause. The cause for civil unrest is, of course, the economic situation. It is bad, and it will only be worse in the future...and then no music will save us from the urban "terrorism".

    1. Re:Fixing the symptom, instead of the cause by clam666 · · Score: 1

      The problem is the mentality of wanting the government to "solve" the problems in the first place. Government can't and hasn't solved a single thing in history. They just promise you that, or try and take credit for it, so you will buy the hype that they are the solution and you should continue sending them your power.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    2. Re:Fixing the symptom, instead of the cause by master_p · · Score: 1

      But it's the government, or the men at top, to provide the solutions. They are in charge, they have the knowledge and the tools. They are just not willing to fix the problems.

    3. Re:Fixing the symptom, instead of the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government can't and hasn't solved a single thing in history.

      Do you really believe a government has never solved a problem in all of history, none through-out all of history? Perhaps you can say they've never really solved a social problem, but governments have had [understatement] some[/understatement] success with macro-engineering projects intended to solve specific problems.

  87. Re:No, it's the Mozart. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Most of Mozart's music is mind-numbing trash

    Hardly "mind-numbing".

    Although media reports of a "Mozart Effect" making you smarter were way overblown, there's still sufficient research showing that listening to Mozart can increase your scores on the the Stanford-Binet spatial subtest that would indicate it's not "mind-numbing".

    As far as your claims of it being "trash", I admit that while Mozart isn't exactly at the quality-level of Deerhunter or The Residents, occasionally listening to Cosi Fan Tutti or Don Giovanni can be quite pleasurable.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  88. Violin danger by __aayejd672 · · Score: 1

    News like this just wants me want to batter someone with a violin.

  89. Re:Mozart by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    She (Renee)is the most beautiful opera diva in the world.

    I saw Ms Fleming sing at the Lyric last year and although I was too far up in the balcony to appropriately appreciate her not inconsiderable décolletage, I can testify that her singing gave me goosebumps.

    To put it in terms that could be understood here, I would definitely hit that, in a musical way.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  90. Re:No, it's the Mozart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken like someone who can't appreciate some of the finer musical artists. Mozart, The Ramones, Beethoven, Bach, Queensryche and Metallica (w/Cliff), to name a few.

  91. Did they plot some functions? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Cuz if they did, it would have been graphiti.

  92. At least classical is nice to listen to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one shopping complex in Australia, they started blasting Australian Folk Songs out, to disperse skegs (not even troublemakers).

    *shudder*

  93. its basic simian psychology by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    childhood is spent absorbing every bond with your parents (to learn)
    the teenage years is spent dissolving every bond with your parents and your society (to become mobile)
    young adulthood is spent growing your own roots in society (somewhere new)
    old adulthood is spent raising your children (as a fixture of society)

    its pretty standard psychological development

    such that our kids (teenagers) have always been our enemies, since before we were even human: its simply a matter of developmental psychology that teenagers spend their years reflecting on and rejecting every bond they have with society, in order to become socially and geographically mobile, so to eventually set down their own roots somewhere new

    its the same with chimpanzees

    this is the only way a social creature can grow its society

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:its basic simian psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the teenage years is spent dissolving every bond with your parents and your society (to become mobile)

      Speak for yourself! While I did go through a rebellious phase as an adolescent, it didn't result in " dissolving every bond with your parents and your society". The emotional and intellectual bonds changed form rather than completely broke. Just because kids eventually get to the point of experimenting with self-determination and experiencing frustration with externally imposed rules doesn't necessarily mean they want to harm their parents or society at large. You are either way exaggerating the actual psychological phenomenon, using the word "enemy" incorrectly, or had one seriously messed-up adolescence!

      such that our kids (teenagers) have always been our enemies, since before we were even human: its simply a matter of developmental psychology that teenagers spend their years reflecting on and rejecting every bond they have with society, in order to become socially and geographically mobile, so to eventually set down their own roots somewhere new

      Except through-out most of human history most people never permanently left the communities of their birth. A small but significant portion usually did, but not nearly enough to make it a universal aspect of human nature.

      its the same with chimpanzees

      No, common chimpanzees are territorial and generally suspicious of foreign chimps, especially males. Occasionally a young or adult chimp (most likely female) could become accepted into another band, but again it's far from a universal phenomenon. It is even less likely in the more peaceful but more deeply entrenced social structure of bonobos.

      this is the only way a social creature can grow its society

      Some of this happens, but if it was exactly like you portray all human societies would completely reinvent themselves each generation. You may actually have a point somewhere but you are grossly overstating it.

  94. Also in Germany by skywatcher2501 · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, it was Hamburg were at the train station speakers were playing classical music. The tourist guide told us it's to scare away drug addicts, as they cannot stand high-pitched sounds like those in classical music.

  95. Poverty Shmoverty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spare the rod, spoil the child.

  96. A better method. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure country music would have had better results.

  97. Article leaves something out by Rutefoot · · Score: 1

    What they haven't touched on is the psychological effects of classical music on people (kids and adults alike).

    Psycholgical studies have been done that have shown that classical music can reduce aggression and anti-social behavior by measurable amounts. They even have a term for the ability for some classical music's ability to improve people's intelligence test results if listened to just before they are given the test: the Mozart effect.

    While I'm sure that fewer kids hang around due to the classical music being played, you can't understate the importantance of the likelyhood that some kids were things less often because they had a lesser desire to thanks to the classical music.

    1. Re:Article leaves something out by Rutefoot · · Score: 1

      "...were vandalizing things less often..."

  98. Re:No, it's the Mozart. by greyline · · Score: 1

    Nice trollin', bro ;-)

  99. I've seen this applied in Denver, CO by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    The McDonalds on 16th in Denver, CO used this technique. They play classical outside their street entrance. I guessed they had been having problems with loiterers, and well, the classical music seemed to've worked. It was clear when I was there.

    --PM

  100. Re:No, it's the Mozart. by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

    You know, I do appreciate the work of Mr Cummings, but I really don't understand how yelling "Sheena is a punk, a punk rocker" into a microphone twenty or thirty times counts as high art on the level of Mozart. Of course, to be fair, I don't really know why Mozart counts as high art either. Is it just because they're both so darn catchy? Cause then Justin Timberlake should count with his clever Motherlovin' song, regardless of Rivers Cuomo's opinion of his work.

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  101. Re:Mozart by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

    Psh, I'd hit it like a cymbal.

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
  102. But what about... by Niubi · · Score: 0

    the internet? And who needs or even wants social control, in any case? People will naturally flock to what they find interesting and in accordance with their needs and desires, whether that is DubLi, music, games...you name it. Hell, even LARPers have friends....

  103. Strange Brew by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Funny, when I think about controlling people with music, I think of a different movie. This wasn't about aversion, though, just straight up mind control! And beer. And hockey. And a dog named Hosehead.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  104. As an upper middle class 30 year old... by netsavior · · Score: 1

    I can tell you that I don't go into places that blast classical music because it bugs the shit out of me. When I am subjected to most classical music I get more and more frustrated until I leave. In my case they would miss out on revenue, not graffiti if I won't go to their store.

    besides don't the kids these days carry their iPod everywhere? They could easily replace whatever crap is being piped in with whatever they want on their earbuds.

  105. Jail/Juvie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tossing these kids into jail/juvie sounds like exactly what's needed. Sounds like Britain made it's OWN downfall by not allowing people to deal with unruly kids/gangs the old fashioned way. If they beat people up, those people should be allowed to defend themselves. If they're repeat offenders they should be put somewhere where they can't hurt the public or themselves. Just because they're kids doesn't mean they should get a free pass on assault,robbery and vandalism.

  106. Mozart Rocks! Anyone Who Says Otherwise is a Idiot by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    Anyone who can listen to Mozart and not love it is an idiot. Mozart is far and away the most talented and awesome composer there is. If these young kids end up hating classical music, then they should just hang a drool bucket under that kid's chin and send them off to the work farm to count beans. Listening to Mozart makes you smarter.

  107. antipathy to classical music by carolusmagnus · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the target audience dislike classical music for the same reason I dislike rap - it is emblematic of a culture hostile to my own.

  108. The History of Modern British Political Evolution. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    You are aware that A Clockwork Orange was fiction, aren't you? It was a movie and not a documentary.

    Ah, but you forget the grand trend of modern British socio-political evolution!

    1) A science-fiction writer writes a dark, paranoid novel about how trends in society of his day will lead to a future, fascist dystopia.
    2) A generation of students grows up reading the classic of literature and incorporating it into their worldview.
    3) Technology catches up with fiction, and a generation of politicians raised on a SF classic decides it would be a good idea to implement by their "obviously more trustworthy than the villains of the novel" hands.

    Sometimes I think of the UK as a nation trying its best to become the world first fully democratic police state.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  109. This is obviously -- by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

    -- cruel and unusual punishment.

    On top of that, if schools (in general) were actually teaching good basic information that children need and can use in life, instead of them becoming more and more social indoctrination clinics, such odd solutions as the one in the article would not even need to be considered.

  110. Re:No, it's the Mozart. by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

    I'll bet the Chinese could conduct the same study with their classical music and get the same result, and in 300 years someone will find the same with Michael Jackson. I wouldn't put too much into that study until the study was done a couple of times by multiple individuals, and I would be very interested in the mechanism that makes it work specifically for classical (as opposed to, say, techno or some of the more complex rock music, where there is also complexity in the notes). Whenever a previously baseless belief is perfectly confirmed, I think that's a good time to be skeptical. What a coincidence it would be that a particular type of centuries old Western music, popular with the 'tasteful' upper class, happens to makes people smarter.

  111. Well... by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Someday soon, we'll be blasting death metal in nursing homes...

    Well, given the ageing of the population, the advance of medicine prolonging life, rthe various "Letter"-Generation getting old, etc. ...the population of nursing home will actually *ask* for death metal.

    (And the nurse would wonder what's wrong in playing "nU b1p-c0re" out loud on their Google iPhone 5G. And why some elderly politician wants to outlaw it on the grounds it corrupts the youth)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  112. Play Yakety Sax on a loop instead by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

    It isn't possible to be a dangerous thug when it's playing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVS3QqrXhD8

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  113. Better Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just force them all to take part in Morris dancing. Solved.

  114. Gated communities? by snowwrestler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've got to be kidding me. I've lived in the DC area my entire life and visit Baltimore quite a bit. The number of "gated communities" I've encountered could be counted on two hands. They're much more common out west, particularly in the Southwest like Vegas or Phoenix.

    You really don't know what you're talking about. There are "bad" neighborhoods near DC (mostly in MD), but they are immediately adjacent to middle class neighborhoods with no barriers between. There are gangs and crime just like any urban area, but they are addressed with policing, youth centers, neighborhood watches, etc. Most of the cities you mention have seen dramatic drops in crime rates over the past 10-15 years.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  115. Denver businesses do this too by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They play loud classical music to drive away drug dealers and loitering youth. It seems to work.

  116. Bugs Bunny and Tom & Jerry Too? by Walt+Sellers · · Score: 1

    Lots of people have been introduced to classical music through the animation of Chuck Jones and others.

    Some people, including myself, have thought there were words to "Barber of Seville" thanks to Chuck's "Rabbit of Seville". And don't forget the Oscar-winning "What's Opera Doc?' with the ever-famous "Kill the Wabiit" song.

    Tom & Jerry usually have their wordless antics backed by wordless orchestra music too.

    1. Re:Bugs Bunny and Tom & Jerry Too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people, including myself, have thought there were words to "Barber of Seville" thanks to Chuck's "Rabbit of Seville".

      Ugh, learning failure... There were words always words that went with the majority of music from "The Barber of Seville", because it was a type of opera. Now obviously they weren't the same words that Chuck Jones used in his cartoons, but what you are referring to was never totally instrumental!

  117. Why waste time getting trouble-makers to hate it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just play music that everyone already hates...like Celine Dion!

  118. Could be worse... by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    It could be worst, they could be playing selections from "American Idol". They wouldn't even have to play it very loud.

    Yes I am aware that this is in the UK, and not the US. The point stands.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  119. Sleep aid by Walt+Sellers · · Score: 1

    Heh, I can confess to using classical music as a sleep-aid occasionally.

    For your maximum laugh at my expense, I offer the story of taking my wife to an Christmas performance of our local orchestra. The music was so soothing I did fall asleep. The moment I snored, she promptly woke me with a well-applied backhand to the shoulder. I awoke the sound of snickers around me. I guess they knew what "snore-whack" meant.

    I'm definitely not any kind of high-minded music person. I was introduced to some of the better aspects of it by a college roommate who was studying music and I began to appreciate the difficulty and hard work of making good music with so many people.

  120. We only want ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... well behaved kids hanging around, like Alex.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  121. What's with your sig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep seeing your signature a lot, and while I think that's cool for you and everything I don't know why you feel so strongly to advocate your preference for orgasms in a "10-man raid"

  122. "Unethical" just doesn't quite do it by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is absolutely disgusting, regardless of its effectiveness. Using Pavlonian conditioning to undermine free will is beyond inhumane.

    Not only that, but they are also abusing these ancient and highly-prized works and further destroying anyone's interest in them in the future.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  123. Re:No, it's the Mozart. by lgw · · Score: 1

    Most of Mozart's music is mind-numbing trash and therefore the perfect choice for this.

    I could not agree more with the youth who find it repugnant.

    I have to agree with this as stated. Mozart wrote constantly, and Sturgeon's Law applies. Just because it's "classical" doesn't make every work a classic - and while Mozart wrote some gems he was still the "boy band" of his day.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  124. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's total bullshit. I'm a youth in England, and stuff like this makes me want to blare some gangsta rap in my local area, to deter misinformed adults. This really winds me up >:-(

  125. disco will turn them teens into zombies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    classical is too kind, they need to start playing 70's disco, thsi will really frighten the youth... dance music without out a beat

  126. McDonalds by orcateers · · Score: 1

    McDonald's used to play country music to discourage loitering at some urban locations

  127. Mod Poet Up by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Oho, very good, very good indeed :D

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  128. Re:Not punishing children was but a temporary fad. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with recent development. Remember that a few decades ago, it was perfectly fine to hit children with wooden rulers, sticks, belts, whatever was at hand. Not punishing children was but a temporary fad.
    [...]
    Just like any animal the old have to ensure their dominance lest they become obsolete.

    You know, it's an interesting point you raise. Historically, parents have been far harsher with their children than they do today. In some ways, our treatment of children as precious is far in contrast to the days when children were passed off to hired help or put to work as laborers. Children were in many ways treated as the enemy.

    Dan Carlin's podcast "Hardcore History" took a review of this in its December 9th episode. I highly recommend it.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  129. 7/11 by message144 · · Score: 1

    The 7/11 mini marts in Los Angeles, California have been doing this for over a decade to repel gangs and homeless persons. The biggest problem is that over time the "undesireables" have beecome desensitized to the classical music and have aquired an immunity to it.

  130. WTF by Alvare · · Score: 1

    What The Fuck ?
    I couldn't believe when I saw this article's title, really.
    I may be 17 and I like classical music, I mean it's music in it's bare form, it's perfect to learn theory, but I listen modern electronic music, that takes all this theory and adds another ton of theory (filters, compression, dynamic ranges, etc) and it's more complex, fun and sometimes original.
    But I would be an hypocrite if I listened to trance and hated formal music, it's like loving house and hating funk, I wouldn't be listening it because I love how it sounds, because they sound the same, I would be listening to it because some social crap.

    --
    4 - A robot may not masturbate, except where such action would conflict with the Second Law.
  131. Why use classical? by vekrander · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of sounds out there that would deter youths. There's the high frequency range that's audible to only younger people that is supposed to work great. Just blaring some Nickelback be would have been enough to keep me from going anywhere near a place.

  132. Wow... It's not just our government. by sick197666 · · Score: 0

    That likes to cover up its own problems with blame.

    Either 1. Brittish parents suck at raising their own kids. This is not unlike the US in any way (or many industrialized/televised nations). They probably also rely on the television, now plus the computer, to raise their kids. They don't have time to get involved in their lives, that's what MTV is for.

    Or 2. Kids, being by definition, cannot vote nor enter the wonderfully vicious world of politics, are outsiders of that world. Outsiders looking in, and they see the problems with a different eye than those involved. Who wouldn't be angry, watching problems evolve that you cannot control, in any way?

    Leads to a lot of people bitching but hardly anyone voting (much like in US), and nothing gets changed; on the national level, the state level, and the local level. Just more angry people who believe that one person cannot do anything or change anything, so why try?

    Take the easy way out. Destroy, not change. Burn it all down.

    At least their being proactive, instead of "Oh, my son is too much to handle, let's give him Ritalin so I don't have to try anymore!", "My vote doesn't count so I'm not going to vote.", or "It's all society's fault!" Good and Evil are better than Aloofness, at least they get off their ass and do something.

  133. lots of things work by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Downtown near where I work, they drive away the bums by blaring Beatles tunes 24 hours a day. In German. It works.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  134. Re:Mozart by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Of course, the performance matters a lot. If you've got the Von Karajan recordings playing on a decent sound system, then it might not scare people away. On the other hand, I saw a play of The Clockwork Orange a few years ago (very 'arty' - all female cast, which really didn't work) that used a techno remix of Beethoven's 9th. That would make most people run away...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  135. Re:Mozart Rocks! Anyone Who Says Otherwise is a Id by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    Yep, i'm gonna be the one to get into a music argument on slashdot.

    Mozart is way overrated. Good? Yes. Chopin, amazing by comparison. Not really contemporaries, so maybe the comparison isn't apt though.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  136. Sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a most thouroughly perverted mind would come to the idea of using music as a weapon.

    They are far below anyone who would use physical violence for the same purpose.

    Also most classical music is indeed crap, like most
    Hip Hop, Rock, Pop or Country music is crap.

  137. Just like in the Shawshank Redemption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still don't know what those Italian ladies were singing, but it must have been about the most beautiful thing in the world.

  138. My problem... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    I do 95% of my music listening while in the car - that's just when I have time to do it. The trouble is exactly what the GP spells out... you can't hear the quiet parts, so you turn up the volume... and then your eardrums get blown out when the cannons go off. Nothing against classical music - I really like it (at least some pieces). But I almost never end up listening to any, because you just can't do it in a car.

  139. Re:Mozart Rocks! Anyone Who Says Otherwise is a Id by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    Obviously, you have not listened to enough Mozart. Years ago my brother and I pooled our money and bought the Complete Mozart Collection, 90 CDs over 45 volumes. I categorically disagree with you. Though you may have heard some of his music, you have not heard enough. Note for note, there is no better classical music composer who ever lived. You are wrong sir! I am not comparing him to Chopin.

  140. Re:No, it's the Mozart. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

    Most of his stuff is kinda dull to listen to, yes. It's all great fun to play, though.

  141. Crime rate is meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe the crime rate is just meaningless.

    A classic "crime rate" is the number of reported crimes per capita (or sometimes per square mile). This ignores the fact that by it's very nature, crime is underreported, and that the more society spends on crime prevention and statistics gathering, the more crime reports are collected per capita. Any serious technique that claims to measuring the amount crime needs to account for these types of systematic bias.

    I'm not saying that spending more resources on crime prevention causes the amount of actual crime to go up, but it probably causes the reported crime rate to go up.

    Having said that, even though since 9/11 the amount of money spend on "security" and crime prevention has gone up 4x, the crime rate has only gone up marginally or even gone down slightly (see fbi statistics at www.fbi.gov). If the statistic actually corrected for reporting bias, there may have been actually a very large drop in the crime rate.

    Of course correlation (spending more resources and crime rate dropped) isn't causation (spending more resources created crime rate decline).

  142. Re:A Clockwork brewer by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    No it does not cover up the taste. There is almost no taste and what is there has a faint odor of skunk spray because of the brewing method and piss poor (pun yes?) glassware and storage. You can to some extent filter the vile out and carefully boost the alcohol by freezing then use it mixed drinks but it's easier to use a turbo yeast and brew a 40 proof malt liquor.

    I have a fermenter full of beer that's been brewing since August 09, it might be bottled this month. It will sit in the bottle conditioning for at least six months longer. I love ales as they are easy and I can beat many of the higher quality high gravity ales in both taste and price.

    My version of swill beer is an all barely malt with a good ale yeast fermented for at least two months and bottle conditioned for three more. I wish it was still cheaper than chinkweiser to make but that alas is long gone unless I get a farm.

    I will trade for lagers from time to time but only a few appeal to me.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  143. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I alight often in Tooting Broadway Tube station, or Balham some times (yeah, I am that posh).

    They play classical music there and it is just audible if you pay attention during the busy parts of the day (when yobs have not waken up anyway), but during off peak times it becomes the dominant sound in the station since there is no other noise.

    This is a great idea, no need for nasty policemen make you feel in a war zone, just sweet Mozart, what a delight .

  144. We know exactly how he wanted his music to sound. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have the written music and we know how the instruments of the era were, including how loud they could be (not much, and orchestras were small, many of Mozart's symphonies can be perfectly serviced by chamber orchestras with the addition of a few wind instruments and a percusionist).

    Of course there is such a thing as interpretation, which makes every performance slightly different, but in general terms how Mozart's music should sound is very uncontroversial.

  145. No, it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem in the UK recognizes no races or creeds.

    The only common denominator is working class depravation.

  146. That is not how it is done here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here there is a varied mix of music: opera, symphonies, piano sonatas, the lot.

    It simply changes the atmosphere, sorry to say, but it immediately feels more sophisticated, and call me classist or whatever else you want, but the neighborhood were my Tube station is is by no means the pretiest, but you see no yobs anywhere, while in other stations elsewhere they are hanging around waiting to cause trouble...

  147. Re:Mozart Rocks! Anyone Who Says Otherwise is a Id by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I will be the first one to admit I haven't heard enough classical music, to be fair.
     
    Any idea if such a collection is available electronically? My work-blinkered internet isn't being much help so far.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  148. Re:Mozart Rocks! Anyone Who Says Otherwise is a Id by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    YouTube is full of Mozart. Go to YouTube and search on Mozart. Here's an awesome one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z37I4ddUKVc