Slashdot Mirror


The Mystery of the Mega-Selling Floppy Disk

osullish writes "People have been proclaiming the death of the floppy for years, yet millions are bought around the world. Who is buying them?"

558 comments

  1. I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cowboy Neil buys them all and archives inane Slashdot comments, like this one.

    1. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cowboy Neil buys them all and archives inane Slashdot comments, like this one.

      20 stories a day.
      400 posts per story.
      99% are inane.
      Average post size? 850 characters (thanks to gnaa c&p trolls)
      ---
      6.4 megabytes per day
      1.4 megabytes per disk
      ---
      4.5 disks per day
      365 days in a year
      ---
      1642 disks per year
      100 disks for $25 = .25 per disk
      ---
      ~$411 per year on backups

      Max write speed: 1000 kilobits / second (7.7 megabytes per minute)
      Time to fill storage:
      314 minutes + 1 minute to toss each disk in an unsorted box (hey, they're using low paid interns of course) ~ 2000 minutes
      ---
      33 hours
      $8.00 an hour
      ---
      $264 per year
      Grand Total: $675.00, or about 3.375 hours with a decent, geeky prostitute

      Seems economical.

    2. Re:I know by jovirus · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Neil buys them all and archives inane Slashdot comments, like this one.

      good

    3. Re:I know by Sivar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems economical.

      Until they try to restore the backup.

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    4. Re:I know by machine321 · · Score: 1

      No, he uses AOL floppies for that.

    5. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's buying them to make goatse rescue floppies.

    6. Re:I know by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 1

      What are these "backups" of which you speak?

      --
      Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
    7. Re:I know by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      They would need to be Dual Redundant backups which would increase costs a bit.

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    8. Re:I know by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      ...or about 3.375 hours with a decent, geeky prostitute

      You know she's geeky because she didn't round down to 3 hours.

    9. Re:I know by humdinger70 · · Score: 1

      More likely, his machine's so old, he has to use floppies to backup his pr0n collection!

    10. Re:I know by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

      Geeky? I think that just makes her a good capitalist...

    11. Re:I know by The+Governor · · Score: 1

      I need them to update the firmware on my DVD drives.

      --
      The more I know, the more I know I don't know.
    12. Re:I know by fucket · · Score: 1

      A good capitalist would round up.

    13. Re:I know by baegucb · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's what we tell all our relatives to do, but don't do ourselves.

    14. Re:I know by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      6.4 megabytes per day
      1.4 megabytes per disk
      ---
      4.5 disks per day
      365 days in a year

      Where are you getting your sizes from? If these are back-ups/archives, then why not compress them? Even this topic (404 comments as of posting) saved as HTML (no external files) is 671kb... making about 13MB's per day... but if it's Zipped, it's only 100kb, which means you could fit about 15 stories per floppy.

      If you start with just the plain-text... 850 chars, is about 946bytes round that up to 1024, for formatting/username, etc...
      1024 * 400 * 20 = about 7.8 MB
      1024 bytes + Zip = 129bytes ... ..
      .
      Anyways, 1 day would be about 0.94MB... so if you're lucky, you could probably fit 2 days on one floppy... or one day, plus the articles themselves.

    15. Re:I know by Imrik · · Score: 1

      She also didn't round up to 3 and a half.

    16. Re:I know by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Grand Total: $675.00, or about 3.375 hours with a decent, geeky prostitute

      Where do you find them that cheap?

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    17. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some people make art with them

      http://www.netdotart.com/exhibit.html

    18. Re:I know by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      But she is round in all the right places.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    19. Re:I know by war4peace · · Score: 1

      You forgot archiving.
      Since it's text-based, the whole thing could theoretically compress to 1% of its original size. So please redo the calculations :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    20. Re:I know by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 1

      > Max write speed: 1000 kilobits / second (7.7 megabytes per minute)

      You're about 2x out there: the maximum bit rate is 1Mbps, but that's after encoding. Before encoding, you're looking at roughly 500kbits/sec. Then you have overheads (headers and gaps), and other stuff to contend with.

      Additionally, you can get about 90,000 magnetic flux transitions on a single track of a 3.5" DSHD disc. You get 160 tracks per disc (80 tracks, 2 sides).

      The More You Know :)

    21. Re:I know by bodan · · Score: 1

      Any recommendations for geeky prostitutes?

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    22. Re:I know by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      But at least we know it's our fault when we lose our data.

    23. Re:I know by mjwx · · Score: 1
      Although you've failed to account for redundant backups (naughty)

      Grand Total: $675.00, or about 3.375 hours with a decent, geeky prostitute

      That's 14.5 nights with a good looking Thai prostitute or 19.8 with a Filipina.

      It really comes down to preference, though it is worth noting the food in Thailand is far superior to that of the Philippines.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    24. Re:I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone's got too much time on their hands!

    25. Re:I know by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      or one day, plus the articles themselves.

      why back up TFA? nobody reads them anyway..

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    26. Re:I know by tgd · · Score: 1

      Grand Total: $675.00, or about 3.375 hours with a decent, geeky prostitute

      Seems economical.

      Wait, what?

      There's geeky prostitutes? *checks wallet*

  2. Some hardware needs them by piraat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess people who use them for their synths? It's why friends of mine still have 'em

    1. Re:Some hardware needs them by drolli · · Score: 5, Informative

      in the lab:

      oscilloscopes, network analysers, pulse generators etc.

    2. Re:Some hardware needs them by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Gods, remember the damn digicams that had full floppy disk drives on them? I used to work with someone that swore up and down that was the "easiest" way to get pictures off a camera and onto a computer. Apparently she had never heard of media readers....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Some hardware needs them by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I modified all my synths. I found that most have a IDE header inside and you can slap a hard drive on it (was made for a ZIP drive) so instead of having 80,000 floppies that fail the 3rd time you use them all my maps and samples are on the hard drive..

      I love older E-mu gear, at least they were smart and made them hackable.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Some hardware needs them by yakatz · · Score: 1

      I use them for my music keyboard and some firmware updates (mostly from Dell) which still require them.

    5. Re:Some hardware needs them by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      That's exactly why I have 3.5" double-sided double-density floppies - an Ensoniq Mirage, and Ensoniq EPS and a Cheetah SX16. Of that three only the EPS has SCSI - and still needs to boot from floppy to format a new SCSI disk.

    6. Re:Some hardware needs them by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Still have one of those. Sony with good macro lens. Takes excellent 640x480 images, which are perfect for embedding in documentation. No reason not to use it.

    7. Re:Some hardware needs them by Shadow_139 · · Score: 5, Informative

      We have >500,000$ CNC equipment your need to load your design via Floppy into a Client system that is then connected via an fecking ISA Card!!!!!
      These systems are less then 5 years old as well !!!!

    8. Re:Some hardware needs them by lxs · · Score: 1

      Sony Mavica.
      640x400 pixel resolution. No EXIF data. And we liked it.

    9. Re:Some hardware needs them by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      The Sony Mavica used to be the bee's knees for this reason. This was before most computers had USB or media readers, so a standard digital camera would plug into your serial port and you'd run through a set of batteries trying to download the pictures to your hard drive. So, for a while, the floppy was the "easiest" way to get pictures off a camera.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    10. Re:Some hardware needs them by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Nice back in the day, but grainy as hell now.

      (Yeah, we have one too.)

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    11. Re:Some hardware needs them by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Informative

      No reason not to use it.

      Except that your cell phone probably takes better pictures.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    12. Re:Some hardware needs them by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      The lab's not wired for the network. Perhaps it should be, but these things tend to fall by the wayside. Plus we use old equipment. The Techtronix Logic Analyzer I sometimes use is still running Windows XP with a built-in floppy.

      I also use floppies to hand-out resumes, transfer files from desktop to laptop (the USB is broke), and for my older Atari/Commodore machines to back-up the ancient games.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:Some hardware needs them by RenderSeven · · Score: 2

      Ha! Exactly! I have a nearly-new top-of-the-line Agilent PSA and every time I need to print a screen shot I have to find a floppy disk, which sometimes takes hours. Fortunately USB-based floppy drives are cheap and I keep one in my laptop bag. (For some reason the floppy disks I keep in my laptop bag disappear, probably through the same wormhole that pens and single socks use to escape)

    14. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please point me to a cell phone camera with a good macro lens (as the GP mentioned in his post). Or are you one of those people who judges the quality of a camera purely based on MP?

    15. Re:Some hardware needs them by slaad · · Score: 1

      Gods, remember the damn digicams that had full floppy disk drives on them? I used to work with someone that swore up and down that was the "easiest" way to get pictures off a camera and onto a computer. Apparently she had never heard of media readers....

      They were useful in their day.

      We used to have those cameras where I work. The floppies were definitely the easiest way to go. As I would find in the following years after they upgraded to newer cameras, media readers and USB cables were rare and easily came up missing in a shared workspace where many departments use the same camera from time to time, yet every computer had a floppy drive. It's really frustrating to take pictures and then have no way to get them off of the camera.

      I wish they would have made a 5 1/4" version though. ;)

      --


      ~Warning!~ The above is encrypted using rot676!
    16. Re:Some hardware needs them by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that your cell phone probably takes better pictures.

      Bigger != Better

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    17. Re:Some hardware needs them by kidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is why I have 10-20 lying around as well. MIDI sequencers don't need more space than a floppy disk provides to save dozens of songs.

    18. Re:Some hardware needs them by omnichad · · Score: 1

      For firmware updates that require a boot floppy, you can just burn a CD-R(W) with an el torito boot image.

    19. Re:Some hardware needs them by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Funny

      You put that thing on the network, soldier, and if my boys fail to contain Skynet, your >$500,000 CNC machine becomes a Skynet factory for building T-1000's. That's why we keep it on floppies.

      Seth

    20. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Highly unlikely given the crap lenses on cell phones.

    21. Re:Some hardware needs them by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The day at work 4 years ago when I was handed a Sony Mavica "company camera" was the day before I started bringing in my personal camera for use at work (for my use only). My colleagues were amazed at the detail and clarity of my photos. The camera was nothing special at all. Just a cheap $200 Kodak P&S. It probably had more to do with making sure objects were illuminated and in focus before taking the photo.

    22. Re:Some hardware needs them by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      What have you got that has an IDE header? The only IDE-equipped samplers I've seen are some of the later Yamaha ones. Even the Akai S6000 uses SCSI...

    23. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine did. My penis was too big and it hurt her a bit.

      That put a dent in my ego... Reality is a bitch.

    24. Re:Some hardware needs them by caseih · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Last time this came up on slashdot, someone brought up this handy little device that looks and acts like a floppy drive (to the controller) but lets you use usb sticks instead:

      http://www.floppytousb.com/

      This should work on all the synths, CNC machines, sewing machines, etc.

    25. Re:Some hardware needs them by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I do my DELL firmware upgrades via a USB stick and USBDOS. Create a bootable USB stick that runs barebones DOS, then copy firmware update .exe, boot, launch, done. The floppy drive is broken on the one system I own that has one.

    26. Re:Some hardware needs them by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Anybody still using 5 and a quarter inch disks? I see they are still being sold even though I haven't seen one in a modern PC since 1990..... http://www.floppydisk.com/buy.htm

      Floppy History - http://oldcomputers.net/floppydisks.html

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    27. Re:Some hardware needs them by JanneM · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Except that your cell phone probably takes better pictures."

      Probably not. Cellphone cams have tiny sensors and tiny low-quality lenses that don't correct for sencond- or third-order aberrations. The resulting image is usually a low contrast, distorted image image with color fringing, coma and veiling glare. That 640x480 image, taken through a relatively high-quality optical system, most likely looks much better than your typical cellphone image, no matter what the relative resolution is on paper.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    28. Re:Some hardware needs them by jonwil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1.It may not be using the standard floppy disk controler interface and may not be able to support that particular gizmo
      2.Are YOU going to be the one to tell the boss that the really really expensive piece of equipment has failed and that they cant get warranty service for it because of an unauthorized third party modification just so you dont need to keep floppy disks around?
      3.What do you do about things that actually come on floppy disk (for example the manufacturer may ship new firmware on floppy that you insert and have the machine read). Yes you could reinstall the disk drive for those rare occasions (or find a way to make the floppytousb device work with a USB floppy so you can read the disk you need to) but that's a lot of work.

    29. Re:Some hardware needs them by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Noooo. The old Sony I'm referring to has a real CCD (not a CMOS sensor) and the macro lens assembly rivals the quality of a good SLR lens. To get the same quality optics we have mounted on the old camera we'd have to spend close to a thousand dollars. My 6MP camera doesn't take as good a photo close-up, in macro mode, as this old Sony. We use this camera to take pictures of parts and PCB's for our manufacturing documentation.

    30. Re:Some hardware needs them by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I was fixing a machine for someone, and the damned drivers came as an exe that wanted to write to a floppy disk instead of just unzipping. The machine didn't have a floppy drive. I went on a hunt for a floppy drive, and found one in another machine that was long since forgotten about in a storage room. When I finally opened the case, there wasn't even a place to plug the floppy in.

          A little black magic later (like you said), and it was happy.

          Someone brought a machine to me a couple hours ago and asked if I wanted any parts from it, before they threw it away. Everything was caked with dust. It did have a floppy drive, but I left it with the machine. I yanked the few useful parts from it (10/100 PCI network card, two old CDRom's, CPU and a really tall heatsink for it's AMD K6-2/350. If anyone wants an old CPU, I'll be more than happy to stuff it in an envelope and mail it off. :)

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    31. Re:Some hardware needs them by Fiddlingfrog · · Score: 1

      A lot of older theatrical lighting consoles still need the 3.5" floppy for backup purposes. You'll often find that older equipment in schools that haven't got the budget to buy a newer console (or have to make the budgetary choice of new console vs. the spring play).

    32. Re:Some hardware needs them by Feef+Lovecraft · · Score: 1

      During the Mcafee issues recently a CNC machine without a CD drive had it's SVCHOST file qurantined, so it couldn't get onto the network and the RPC service was disabled because of this so we were unable to use a USB stick. Floppy disk to the rescue.

    33. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG. A $275 device, not counting shipping....or grandma can use floppies in her sewing machine....

    34. Re:Some hardware needs them by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gods, remember the damn digicams that had full floppy disk drives on them? I used to work with someone that swore up and down that was the "easiest" way to get pictures off a camera and onto a computer. Apparently she had never heard of media readers....

      Remember, these were made in the late 90's early 2000s. Floppy disks were CHEAP, a box of 10 would run you $10 if not less on sale. A meager 16MB card would cost $100+ easily. So you could go with a camera that required $100+ memory cards to use, or went with one that used common floppy disks that at the time, everyone had. No messing with serial cables, parallel cables (or if you were lucky, USB) transferring data. Just eject the disk from the camera, pop it in your PC, done.

      They literally were the fastest, cheapest storage media around, and damn trivial to transfer data off of. Later versions used a CD burner to record mini CDs for the same reason - flash media was freaking expensive (though by then, a 128MB card could be had for around $100, but the CDs costed $10 or less). And you didn't have to put up with USB 1.1 speeds.

      NOwadays we scoff as we buy 8GB cards for $10, but prices have seriously plummeted only in the past few years.

    35. Re:Some hardware needs them by confused+one · · Score: 1

      I still have a box of 5 1/4" disks in my desk drawer. Double density 360kB. We only retired that machine late last year and I kept a box of disks, basically, to show to my children.

    36. Re:Some hardware needs them by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Except that your cell phone probably takes better pictures.

      Bigger != Better

      Plus, if his cellphone camera is anything like mine, the lens always has fingerprints on it.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    37. Re:Some hardware needs them by NoNeeeed · · Score: 2, Informative

      in the theatre:

      Lighting control desks normally use them for letting you save lighting plots (most also have hard-drives for normal use). Lighting plots are a tiny amount of data that easily fit on a floppy.

      Most are just DOS PCs with a digital desk and DMX connections to the dimmer packs and other gear.

      I would like to be able to use a USB key, but that's more because I don't have a floppy drive for my laptop so can't get the data onto it to edit.

    38. Re:Some hardware needs them by kevinmenzel · · Score: 1

      Yup, to load really old DOS games onto my 286, via a trip to my 386 first (which has both 3.5" and 5.25" drives... the BIOS on my current computer doesn't support 2 floppy drives, or else I'd stick a 5.25" drive right under my blu-ray drive for fun). Why? Because sometimes, on rare occasion, it's more fun, and just a tad easier, to play a game that assumed a certain CPU speed, on a CPU of that speed, instead of via emulation. I used to do it over a network by running a DOS FTP server and uploading the files from my main computer... but that was back before I finally had to replace the aging 20MB SCSI drive with a pretty "new" 40MB IDE drive - I don't have the disks for any of that old networking software anymore... and being that it's relatively hard to find software that doesn't require a minimum of a 386 to run anymore...

    39. Re:Some hardware needs them by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      If you've got an IDE header, why not use a CF card? They're pin-for-pin compatible with IDE.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    40. Re:Some hardware needs them by uberjack · · Score: 1

      I have an old 8-bit MSX that has a 3.5" floppy drive. Drive works surprisingly well - much better than my XBox 360, anyway.

    41. Re:Some hardware needs them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Would you rather have a 1 dollar bill, or a 100 dollar bill?

      Wait, sometime bigger IS better.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    42. Re:Some hardware needs them by alfredos · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it's not news to you, but EMC http://www.linuxcnc.org/ is quite capable and has all the advantages of the platform it runs on.

    43. Re:Some hardware needs them by Reziac · · Score: 1

      At $275 each, I can see why this hasn't caught on.

      If it were in the $10 range (which is probably realistic considering it can't be much more than a chip, its embedded software, a cable, and two ports) it would sell like hotcakes. As it is, I doubt it sells at all except to the desperate.

      I know at $10 I'd buy 'em just to have on hand.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    44. Re:Some hardware needs them by IorDMUX · · Score: 2, Informative

      My old lab had a dozen such floppy-craving lab tools, including an oscilloscope which ran Windows XP and came with touch screen Solitaire (it sat unused... too slow). For all of them, we just had two or three floppies which had been passed around for years. They were the old, hardy kind of 3.5" disk which didn't mysteriously fail to format after a year or two, and we never needed to save more than a megabyte or two of plots, at once.

      So despite all of our lab tools, we did not contribute a cent to this mysterious floppy market in TFA.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    45. Re:Some hardware needs them by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      the RPC service was disabled because of this so we were unable to use a USB stick

      Why would you need RPC to access a USB stick? That sounds like a terrible performance overhead and just asking for security problems. I don't think anybody in their right mind would design such a system.

    46. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme guess - you are an iphone user and think it's the best camera out there?

    47. Re:Some hardware needs them by JustNilt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (Side note: This is why I read Slashdot. You have to wade through the muck but there're still nuggets of pure gold here and there.) Sorry ... on topic now:

      1.It may not be using the standard floppy disk controler interface and may not be able to support that particular gizmo

      Well, if you RTFL (I know, I know ....) then you'd have seen this:

      The device connects to your existing power and data (ribbon) cables.

      The soundless drive emulates your existing floppy drive to act as if the floppy drive was never removed. This drive will replace most any existing 720k/1.44MB capacity IBM format floppy drive or your money back. Do away with the painfully slow and obsolete floppy disks. Not only will this device work in PCs but, it will also work in machinery or devices that still use floppy drives. This device completely replaces the universal floppy drive of computerized system. If you are not certain this device will work in your equipment, then just ask! 1 Year Warranty. This device also emulates NON IBM type drives (TEAC, etc) and can also be setup as a DRIVE 0, DRIVE 1 configuration

      Back to your points:

      2.Are YOU going to be the one to tell the boss that the really really expensive piece of equipment has failed and that they cant get warranty service for it because of an unauthorized third party modification just so you dont need to keep floppy disks around?

      I agree this is a good thing to consider. It may not always be a good idea even if it works. Definitely a YMMV solution.

      3.What do you do about things that actually come on floppy disk (for example the manufacturer may ship new firmware on floppy that you insert and have the machine read). Yes you could reinstall the disk drive for those rare occasions (or find a way to make the floppytousb device work with a USB floppy so you can read the disk you need to) but that's a lot of work.

      I wonder if one of the USB floppies would work. While it most likely wouldn't, I sort of like the Goldbergian aspect of running a floppy controller -> USB converter -> USB floppy drive emulator when needed. Hehe. In reality, I'd probably go with a floppy cable that supports 2 drives and run the floppy drive on one and the FloppytoUSB device on the other, just in case.

      Nonetheless, this is quite an interesting device. I'll probably pick one up just to fiddle with. I'd love to have the option of USB sticks being available in such odd DOS environment for some clients.

      --
      You know the thing about UDP jokes? I don't care if you get it or not.
    48. Re:Some hardware needs them by batquux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about something like this?
      http://www.memorysuppliers.com/smartdisk-flashpath-smartmedia.html?CAWELAID=327820619

      Stick a SD card into a floppy shaped device that your drive can read like it's a real floppy. The drive can still read floppies, and there's no evidence for the warranty people.

    49. Re:Some hardware needs them by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I also use floppies to hand-out resumes,

      Wouldn't it be smarter to hand them out on CDs? They're just as cheap (and since you're not getting it back, single write isn't a probleM), and you're far more likely for the person you're handing it to to actually be able to read it.

      I can honestly say that if you gave our HR Department a resume on floppy they'd have to scramble to find a machine that could read it. My guess is it's more likely your app/resume would simply not make it to the next round of consideration.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    50. Re:Some hardware needs them by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      Dad is that you? My dad also works at a machine shop that has a similar CNC setup.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    51. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, those adapters don't behave like a normal floppy. You have a special driver which re-reads the first "track" over and over, and the data from the SD card is presented there in chunks.

    52. Re:Some hardware needs them by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I know why they did it, but it's still a WTF that they run antivirus (and Windows, really) on a CNC machine.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    53. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtual floppy drives are nice. Even the winxp ddk came with an example on how to build one.

    54. Re:Some hardware needs them by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup. I worked for a Mac shop that had a $40 bounty (for employees) on any IIci/cx machines we acquired. They had a customer whose CNC machines all ran on NuBus cards on these old 68030 Macs. Doing public school support, was able to keep beer and skittles money in pocket 'helping out' teachers and such clean out their tech stash.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    55. Re:Some hardware needs them by Jonny_eh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't there also a medium that a resume can be put on that doesn't even require a computer to read? I can't recall what it is at the moment...

    56. Re:Some hardware needs them by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Very true, and paper IS what I use, but I was kinda assuming that given the fact that he was using floppies that he had some reason for wanting to distribute an electronic copy.

      That said, the last few postings I've seen were fine submitting a file electronically over the net.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    57. Re:Some hardware needs them by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i did a bit of reading on the device since it was first linked, and from what i can tell it basically only exposes 1.44MB to the controller. That is, you copy data from the usb device into the floppy "emulator", and it then make 1.44MB of that available to the hardware at the other end of the cable. Its not something that will allow you to access x GB, or whatever the space is, on the usb device inserted.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    58. Re:Some hardware needs them by Retron · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen one in a modern PC since 1990

      My PC's pretty modern (a year old) and it has one:

      http://i41.tinypic.com/24mt7ic.jpg

      Note the shiny icon Windows 7 applies to it!

      Sadly for me the BIOS only supports one floppy drive for some reason. As I don't have a 5.25" USB floppy drive - it has to be that one.

    59. Re:Some hardware needs them by hitmark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i wonder, how much space do the drive see?

      do it only see the first 1.44MB of the SD card?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    60. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The product in the link uses SmartMedia and not SD.
      Perfect solution, replace an obsolete format with an adapter that uses another obsolete format...

    61. Re:Some hardware needs them by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right that optics make a big difference (although something can be said for the impact of averaging the extra data from a poor but high res image, in some cases). Your preference for a 'real CCD' is outdated, though. CMOS is no longer synonymous with 'cheap crappy phone camera' - they come in several thousand dollar SLRs too, now!

    62. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not write a gpib driver to grab the traces? that's what some of here have done.

    63. Re:Some hardware needs them by soppsa · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Handing resumes out on floppies is a great way to remain unemployed.

    64. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. Just get a SmartMedia to SD adapter!

    65. Re:Some hardware needs them by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      1.It may not be using the standard floppy disk controler interface and may not be able to support that particular gizmo

      Well, if you RTFL (I know, I know ....) then you'd have seen this:

      The device connects to your existing power and data (ribbon) cables.

      It's not entirely clear, but I'm pretty sure you're interpreting the original sentence ass backwards.

    66. Re:Some hardware needs them by acohen1 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, the only real advantage of CCD over CMOS is that it has a 2D ROI (Region of Interest) instead of 1D so you can do lower resolutions (for higher framerate) at the correct aspect ratio.

    67. Re:Some hardware needs them by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no, it's a WTF that lab, industrial, and SCADA equipment is built using Windows and then windows updates are not enabled or supported by the vendor that decided to use freakin Windows in the first place. if you're going to use a general purpose processor and software system in a piece of computing "furniture" / "appliance" at least have the decency to use an obscure OS, use a fairly secure OS (freeBSD), or just run on bare metal (no OS).

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    68. Re:Some hardware needs them by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      What about something like this? http://www.memorysuppliers.com/smartdisk-flashpath-smartmedia.html?CAWELAID=327820619

      Stick a SD card into a floppy shaped device that your drive can read like it's a real floppy. The drive can still read floppies, and there's no evidence for the warranty people.

      That device uses SmartMedia cards not Secure Digital cards.

    69. Re:Some hardware needs them by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Smart Media is not Secure Digital. While 128 MB is a lot more than 1.4 MB, why would one trade one obsolete media for another?

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    70. Re:Some hardware needs them by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      When it comes to getting a good picture, no amount of mega pixels will get you the light you need. You need a large aperture, this is why SLRs kick the shit out of pocket cameras when it comes to taking pictures at dusk/dawn/night or anything quickly moving.

    71. Re:Some hardware needs them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense. The computer industry evolves at a rapid pace, so equipment that was in vogue five years ago is considered hopelessly Luddite today. So what happens with technical equipment that is designed to last decades? You toss out a $10,000 worth of lab machines because new ones use USB instead?

    72. Re:Some hardware needs them by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      I still be using Floppy Disks and use them to store sound effects for Video Editing. As the effects are short files they are ideal media for this and are reliable. USB Keys could be used but usually are of to big of a storage and are not as easy to be stored. I still hope that they will be made till someone comes up with a system that works as well as Floppys and do not use more space. Using CDs or DVDs are not really a replacement as if one goes wrong I loose the lot as for a Floppy I just loose one sound effect but usually have two, so I have at least one back up and would make straight away a new backup.
      Bernhard Koster, Poole / Dorset

      Wow.

      I started moving away from floppies ~8 years ago. I find a 4TB NAS works far better for maintaining copies of everything. I've had multiple drive failures, and haven't lost anything to date. Can't say the same about old floppies.

      Can you imagine how much money this guy spends on floppies? I spent less than $500 on my NAS. Per megabyte, I'm waaaaay ahead.

    73. Re:Some hardware needs them by ezrec · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time (circa 2000), I wrote a Linux driver for the damned thing, fully supported by SanDisk.

      It's Made of Evil. You need special software to be able to ready/write it (since it only has the read/write area that contacts the head on side 0, track 0), only transfers at 150K bits/sec (MFM encoded), and uses obsolete memory technologies.

      If anyone has one of these crusty things, I might have a version of mtdtools that will work with it laying around somewhere.

      If you want a copy, email jason dot mcmullan the-at-sign google's mail dot com

    74. Re:Some hardware needs them by evilWurst · · Score: 1

      > 1.It may not be using the standard floppy disk controller interface and may not be able to support that particular gizmo

      The linked drive does, and there are other drives that do. If the drive you're *replacing* uses non-standard connections, though, then yeah, you're already screwed anyway.

      > 2.Are YOU going to be the one to tell the boss that the really really expensive piece of equipment has failed and that they cant get warranty service for it because of an unauthorized third party modification just so you dont need to keep floppy disks around?

      I gather that devices in question are obsolete unsupported things already? It's a matter of either stay stuck using floppies, replace the drive, or replace the entire machine. For many things the latter option is not available (no new machine exists, or it's very very expensive, or it's incompatible with some other thing that the company still needs).

      > 3.What do you do about things that actually come on floppy disk (for example the manufacturer may ship new firmware on floppy that you insert and have the machine read). Yes you could reinstall the disk drive for those rare occasions (or find a way to make the floppytousb device work with a USB floppy so you can read the disk you need to) but that's a lot of work.

      I assume the main use of a flopputousb drive is to replace the built in drive on legacy systems (like other posts have mentioned, things like oscilloscopes and factory machinery and music synth).

      What you would do is also keep a USB floppy drive (as in, a physical external drive that reads floppy discs but connects using USB); these have existed since Apple phased out floppy drives in the late '90s, and they're still available for $20-$30. You can then use that with any modern computer to transfer new incoming floppy disks to flash drives that will then work with floppytousb. Ideally you'd only ever read a floppy disc once - back up that data on hard drives or optical discs and transfer from there to flash as needed. And if the floppytousb drive itself dies and can't be replaced, since you'll still have the floppy data backed up, you'll be able to switch to whatever floppy-replacement format did survive, or even go back to actual floppies if you have drives and discs around.

      The general idea is that instead of relying on irreplaceable old stuff, you can shift the weak spot back to modern commodities. USB ports are likely to be around for several more decades, USB drives likewise (and will work even if the underlying tech shifts; nand flash and USB hard drives show up the same way to the host device). A few cheap external USB floppy readers will probably outlive everything else, since they're sturdy things that you'll barely ever be using.

    75. Re:Some hardware needs them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      CD writers are starting to become standard, but they're not quite standard equipment. CD writing software especially is not available everywhere, and is not at all simple to use with a wide variety of incompatible formats that will baffle the neophyte. Granted, floppies aren't the best for resumes either, but CDs aren't much better.

      Then you've got to figure out what file format to put on it...

      Paper works though. And some HR people are fine with getting plain old text in email.

    76. Re:Some hardware needs them by jalagl · · Score: 1

      Our family business has an embroidery machine that reads patterns from floppy disks. We also had to buy USB floppy drives for the PCs were patterns are created.

      --
      -.
    77. Re:Some hardware needs them by Derleth · · Score: 1

      There’s also a special filing system for those documents, one that gets emptied automatically at the end of the day. I believe you techies call it “garbage collection.”

      --
      How can you use my intestines as a gift? -Actual Hong Kong subtitle.
    78. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeppers - paper...that is subsequently scanned, OCRed and searched using...you guessed it...a computer.

    79. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, lots of oldish music gear is out there that uses floppies. And custom disk formats, too..

      Though there was a guy making a low-level floppy emulator device that used files on SD cards...
      http://www.atari-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=18893

    80. Re:Some hardware needs them by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Won't work for those machines that don't have USB, and those are the ones that are usually do-or-die if they stop working.

    81. Re:Some hardware needs them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      CD writers are starting to become standard, but they're not quite standard equipment.

      He's not requiring that the person receiving them be able to write CD, just read them, and that is standard equipment. And based on looking for computers recently, I would say that CD writers are standard equipment. Computers either come with a CD writer or a DVD reader at a minimum, and most now have a DVD burner, accomplishing both.

      CD writing software especially is not available everywhere, and is not at all simple to use with a wide variety of incompatible formats that will baffle the neophyte.

      I don't use the tools built in because they are generally inferior, but I thought XP and higher have drag and drop writing to CDs. So yes, there is writing software widely available, they call it Windows.

      Then you've got to figure out what file format to put on it...

      Are you just being obtuse? Roughly 100% of companies can read a Microsoft Word document, and that would be the format expected by almost all companies. Lower on the "expected" list, but readable on a scale that removes the "roughly" from the comment above, you could put it in PDF format. If I were submitting a resume, I'd put it in both Word and PDF and let them pick. If I wanted to be cute about it, I'd include PDF install packages in the extra space on the CD.

      Paper works though. And some HR people are fine with getting plain old text in email.

      Plain old text for a resume? Do you want to remain unemployed? Your resume will be harder to read than anyone else's when you are in plain text and they have formatting and such that delineates sections and draws emphasis on the important parts. At least send it in HTML, or link to your resume on your personal web site in HTML or something. But bashing standards like PDF with comments like trying to figure out a format, then sending the thing in plain text would indicate to me that you are someone I'd never hire.

    82. Re:Some hardware needs them by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      I read TFM and it said you actually load files from the USB drive into it's internal memory. It also said something about being able to choose which files are loaded somehow. But even better you can plug a network cable in to it and use it's built in web-server to upload files directly into memory. This would be an incredibly Rube Goldberg solution unless you were using an expensive to replace legacy device that only had a floppy drive and then it would save you a lot of switching out of floppies.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    83. Re:Some hardware needs them by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 1

      Water jets need them too.

    84. Re:Some hardware needs them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Does the copy to CD feature in XP create an ISO-9660 compatible CD file system, or even Joliet? I thought it was some weird packet writing format.

      Also, I have received plain old text resumes, and I have had those people hired. Often that plain old text was the result of HR scanning paper that was received and mailing it out. Most technical people are capable of looking at a resume's contents, it's just the HR folks you have to get past. Never sent plain text though.

      And fewer than 100% of people given a resume can use Word to read it. Every version of Word uses a different not-quite-compatible format. When I get a resume that requires me to hunt down a Word plug in order to read it, I lose a lot of interest in seeing what the resume has to say (would be nice if more people were smart enough to save in Word 6 format instead of mostly-OOXML).

      I'm not bashing PDF, but just pointing out that PDF writers are rare. Windows doesn't have default printer drivers that write to PDF, Word doesn't have a save-as-PDF option that I can find.

    85. Re:Some hardware needs them by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      But at least if they give you a resume on a floppy, you can skim it, then think..

      "No, they're not really right for this job. I'll reformat the disk.."

      "But they did give out their resume on a floppy I was able to use. Maybe I should give them a cha...D'Oh!"

    86. Re:Some hardware needs them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Does the copy to CD feature in XP create an ISO-9660 compatible CD file system, or even Joliet? I thought it was some weird packet writing format.

      We are talking about resumes. I don't know and don't care because the person being handed that will be putting it in a Microsoft-based computer anyway.

      Often that plain old text was the result of HR scanning paper that was received and mailing it out.

      HR would scan, OCR, then send out the resultant text, rather than scanning to TIFF or PDF? That seems much more prone to errors, and a PDF isn't that big (and unlike your comments below about PDF writers, I've not seen a consumer-grade scanner that didn't include the ability to save to PDF.

      And fewer than 100% of people given a resume can use Word to read it. Every version of Word uses a different not-quite-compatible format. When I get a resume that requires me to hunt down a Word plug in order to read it, I lose a lot of interest in seeing what the resume has to say (would be nice if more people were smart enough to save in Word 6 format instead of mostly-OOXML).

      They should send it in the two-generation-old version. That's new enough that all the newer ones will read it without a problem and have all the features necessary for a good resume, but still be openable by those that are a generation or two behind. I should have specified that, as saving with the defaults in the newest version of Word would be a bad idea because it does limit viewership. But I do stand by the statement that almost every computer out there can open a Word Doc, you have to just make sure you save in the most compatible DOC format.

      I'm not bashing PDF, but just pointing out that PDF writers are rare. Windows doesn't have default printer drivers that write to PDF, Word doesn't have a save-as-PDF option that I can find.

      Included for free with Mac, so they don't have to worry about Word compatibility, and there are tons of free print-to-PDF solutions out there. You may as well have bashed me for saying include PDF when Windows doesn't support it by default like it does RTF so I'd be limiting the viewership to only those on Macs and whatever Linux or other OSs have PDF readers bundled. But you realize that PDF readers are assumed to be installed, yet someone going out of his way to make his resume accessible would save in the wrong DOC format and wouldn't know how to Google "free PDF printer".

      Not to mention it was about what formats you'd put them in so people could read them, not what formats are most convenient for saving, so I obviously didn't address the question that wasn't asked.

    87. Re:Some hardware needs them by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? If you had written that in 2000, I would have given you a slightly raised eyebrow, as you would have been on shaky ground even then. Today, CD writers are absolutely and utterly standard equipment. CD Burning software? Included in every OS shipping today out of the box, and if you still have Windows 2000 clunking around somewhere then CD Burner XP is free.

      That's beside the fact that only the person giving out the resume needs that. The recipient only needs a regular CD drive which has been standard equipment for about 15 years now.

      Format? Your choice - MS Word or PDF are guaranteed to be usable. I personally like PDF because I'm guaranteed the correct layout when they open it, but whichever is fine.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    88. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 dollar bills and 100 dollar bills are exactly the same size, stupid.

    89. Re:Some hardware needs them by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Why? What's the big risk in running windows? There is a fair chance that anything could go physically wrong with the machine. With a decent image of the drive, if something goes wrong you could always just restore the image to a new drive or a broken installation. If it is a single purpose machine I could easily envision this squeezing onto a few dvds as well. Just in case. From what I've seen, windows is used just as much if not more in production machines, like cnc routers, huge industrial large format printers, etc. Windows does have the advantage of being fairly easy to code for and a pretty well known target. Seriously. You make it out like it is some sort of crime to install windows on a freaking cnc router. I really doubt security is the #1 issue for a single purpose computer that will run one application all the time, potentially without any sort of internet access, or at least limited behind a firewall. Why is unix always the answer for getting "real work" done? (a lot of linux installations in industrial equipment don't update as well...thus making them more vulnerable over time......) Why is linux so much more secure than windows? If you ask me windows has certainly come a long way, especially with vista/windows7. Not running as administrator 24/7 breaks a lot of common vulnerabilities. Sure there are probably huge open holes in the sides (let's not even talk about the back door....), but they've certainly done a much better job of at least making the front of the place looking locked up. MacOS and Linux just aren't big targets. I really don't think there is any way to quantify which platform is ultimately more secure because Windows is always the one that receives the most attention and scrutiny. I'm not the biggest M$ fan, but truth be told, their operating system has reached the point where I can tolerate it and not outright hate it. I love linux, but it ultimately feels so unpolished in comparison and sadly runs very few of my favorite applications.

      You see after over 20 years of doing things with computers, I really don't care what I'm running as long as I can run the apps I really can't live without anymore. The environment is just a shell to me. I'm sort of digging the bling of windows 7, but in the end, I could care less about that sort of thing. I just want to launch my apps and do some work. In truth, lately I've been liking android quite a bit in its extreme simplicity. It just dishes up the apps I want and doesn't really do a whole lot to get in the way and everything runs in a nice little sandbox. I'm sure there are some vulnerabilities, but it seems like you'd have to grant something access before that would happen, outside of any root vulnerabilities in the kernel itself. I could totally see android on a netbook versus chrome. It sure would be a lot more usable....

    90. Re:Some hardware needs them by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Who the hell wants a K6-2/350 anymore? Might as well be a 386.

    91. Re:Some hardware needs them by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Back then they built hardware to last. Nowadays they build shit as cheap as possible with no thought to longevity since product life cycles are starting to shrink from 5 years to 2-3, or even 1 year in the case of cell phones. In return we get a sea of never ending upgraded devices that end up in landfills after a few short years. In one way it is interesting, because the pace of technology is rapidly exploding, but at the same time, at what cost? I guess enjoy the decadence while it lasts..........

    92. Re:Some hardware needs them by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      The company I work at has an environmental chamber they use for laser hermetic sealing. The software to control the XY table is proprietary, the developer wont port it to windows and it cant run in a dos emulator (like dosbox) because it uses ISA cards. So we have to use DOS and floppies are our only reliable way to transfer programs for the XY table. The boss wont let us near the machine to install an ISA ethernet card, a dos tcp/ip stack and an SMB client.

      So for us poor bastards floppies are here to stay.

    93. Re:Some hardware needs them by dullnev · · Score: 1

      http://www.floppydisk.com/buy.htm

      Wow, these guys still sell 8" floppies!

    94. Re:Some hardware needs them by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That's what I figured the response would be. I'm going to toss it in my box of antique processors that I pull out occasionally to show people. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    95. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, there are two steps here. The drive that goes in the legacy system plugs into the same internal cable as a floppy drive does, but takes USB sticks as input and correctly maps it to the floppy standard. The legacy system needs no USB ports.

      The other step is a modern computer with USB ports. You use that to stuff a floppy disc into an external floppy drive and copy its contents to a USB flash drive.

    96. Re:Some hardware needs them by JustNilt · · Score: 1

      You know, on second reading, you're right. Then again, what device would bother with a custom interface for no reason when standard ones exist? (I'm being a little facetious here ... I've seen stranger things.)

      --
      You know the thing about UDP jokes? I don't care if you get it or not.
    97. Re:Some hardware needs them by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      Does the copy to CD feature in XP create an ISO-9660 compatible CD file system, or even Joliet? I thought it was some weird packet writing format.

      No special formats, it writes standard ISO-9660 with Joliet extensions. I've used it plenty of times when I needed to copy data off a computer.

      I'm not bashing PDF, but just pointing out that PDF writers are rare. Windows doesn't have default printer drivers that write to PDF, Word doesn't have a save-as-PDF option that I can find.

      Microsoft Office Add-in: Microsoft Save as PDF or XPS. It is a free download.

      Myself, I use a simple format saved in HTML. Everything, including my old Atari, can read it.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    98. Re:Some hardware needs them by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Does the copy to CD feature in XP create an ISO-9660 compatible CD file system, or even Joliet? I thought it was some weird packet writing format.

      We are talking about resumes. I don't know and don't care because the person being handed that will be putting it in a Microsoft-based computer anyway.

      Really? If you submit your CV to my company I can guarantee you that it won't be read on a MS based computer because my company doesn't _have_ any MS based computers. We are exclusively Linux based and if your CV can't be read on a stock Fedora workstation it is liable to be filed in the bin. (Also, as a side note, if you submit your CV in a non-portable format we are liable to label you a bit of an idiot, even if we can read it, so it doesn't help your employment prospects too much).

      I'm not bashing PDF, but just pointing out that PDF writers are rare. Windows doesn't have default printer drivers that write to PDF, Word doesn't have a save-as-PDF option that I can find.

      Included for free with Mac, so they don't have to worry about Word compatibility, and there are tons of free print-to-PDF solutions out there.

      OpenOffice has a PDF exporter (although oddly it gives inferior results than printing to a postscript file and running pstopdf on the result).

    99. Re:Some hardware needs them by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Yes, CMOS has come a long way. The cell phone cameras still use the "cheap crappy" CMOS sensors, though. Not the (expensive) good ones used in SLR cameras.

    100. Re:Some hardware needs them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you submit your CV to my company I can guarantee you that it won't be read on a MS based computer because my company doesn't _have_ any MS based computers.

      Well, that and the fact you called it a CV means I probably can't work in your country anyway without a work permit I don't hold.

      We are exclusively Linux based and if your CV can't be read on a stock Fedora workstation it is liable to be filed in the bin.


      Then you will be able to use Open Office to open it, so I am unclear why you are speaking as if Microsoft Doc format is some enigma.

    101. Re:Some hardware needs them by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Then you will be able to use Open Office to open it, so I am unclear why you are speaking as if Microsoft Doc format is some enigma.

      Who said anything about Doc format? The post you were replying to was asking if XP wrote CDs in ISO9660 format or "some weird packet writing format". You replied saying that you didn't care because you could guarantee that it would be opened on a Windows machine.

      I am simply pointing out that there is no such guarantee - some companies (such as mine) are Linux-only shops, others are Apple-only shops. So you _should_ care whether or not you are supplying your CV in a format that can be universally read.

      (for the record, AFAIK XP uses UDF packet writing to burn CDs, which is supported by Linux, but that isn't the point - the point is that you said you _didn't care_ whether non-windows systems could read it).

    102. Re:Some hardware needs them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      the point is that you said you _didn't care_ whether non-windows systems could read it

      I don't. You are posting about your company in the UK (I'm guessing) so it's illegal for me to work there. That you don't have any Windows boxes is irrelevant to my ability to get a job there. So yes, I don't care one whit whether you can read the CD. It's illegal for me to work for you.

      I've found that the number of places outside the US that are Windows Free are higher than within. Also, those in the US, unless staffed by pompous asses that no one would want to work for anyway, realize that Windows is the de facto standard.

      So yes, I don't care. I've had 20+ jobs in my life, and never has the HR person had anything other than a Windows computer (if they had a computer at all). And I've not heard of any place, other than 5-man or smaller IT shops, where they didn't have a Windows computers for almost everything. And the job I have now specifically requested my resume in DOC format. Anyone who doesn't interoperate with Windows does so purposefully and by their own choosing. If some company chooses to go out of their way to be purposefully obtuse, then I probably wouldn't want to work there.

    103. Re:Some hardware needs them by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      the point is that you said you _didn't care_ whether non-windows systems could read it

      I don't. You are posting about your company in the UK (I'm guessing) so it's illegal for me to work there.

      The country involved seems pretty irrelevant - this is an example of just one company, I'm sure there are plenty of similar companies in the US.

      Also, those in the US, unless staffed by pompous asses that no one would want to work for anyway, realize that Windows is the de facto standard.

      It may be a defacto standard, but it is expensive and offers nothing useful that my company can't get elsewhere (for less money and less hassle). Supporting Windows machines increases the administration costs - would you like to explain to me what benefit my company would get from doing so (and if the answer is purely that we gain the ability to read the CVs from people who don't have a lot of common sense then I'd suggest that we're not missing out on much)?

      Anyone who doesn't interoperate with Windows does so purposefully and by their own choosing.

      Well yes, but the reasoning behind this is often sound.

      If some company chooses to go out of their way to be purposefully obtuse

      This has nothing to do with being "purposefully obtuse" and everything to do with picking the best system for the job at hand. I would find it concerning if a company wasted resources using a system that was more expensive than an alternative system which was as or more suitable.

      The company I run has no use for Windows systems - pretty much everything we do can be done as well or better on Linux systems for a much lower cost. This means that we have more money to invest in things that _actually_ matter and thus the whole company is better off. I would venture that the company is also better off avoiding employing people with an extremely closed "must run Windows because everyone else does" mindset, so I don't have a lot of problem with ignoring CVs from people such as yourself.

      It should be noted that I don't have anything specifically against Windows or any other system - if it is the best tool for the job then by all means that is what should be used; it is just that in my business I have usually found that there are better and cheaper alternatives, which are more suitable for the job in hand, if you just look past popularity..

    104. Re:Some hardware needs them by Shadow_139 · · Score: 1

      Please If I even go near the CNC with that device, the manufacture with not honer the maintenance contract......

    105. Re:Some hardware needs them by Shadow_139 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget hign-end medical equipment to, some that are still running NT4 or Windows 2000 RTM {Service Pack 0} with no patches at all.

      I'm talking about MRI, X-Ray Machine, Robotic Camera and Robotic Surgical Tools !!!!!

    106. Re:Some hardware needs them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with being "purposefully obtuse" and everything to do with picking the best system for the job at hand.

      If the "job at hand" is to receive random submissions by the general public, then it either needs to be interoperable with Windows, or it is not the best system for the job at hand.

      I don't have a lot of problem with ignoring CVs from people such as yourself.

      As I said, deliberately obtuse. You decide what everyone else should be using, knowing it's not what they are using, then hold it against them if they aren't guessing that you are one of the tiny minority not using Windows. You sound like a pompous ass.

      "Would you like to explain to me what benefit my company would get from [running windows]?" as a challenge when you don't even tell me what you do? Sounds like you are either made up in your mind so much that it doesn't matter what I could say (making you a pompous ass), or it's a rhetorical question you don't care what the answer is because you know it isn't answerable without more information you are purposefully withholding (making you a pompous ass). So, as I said before, with coworkers like you, it's a place I wouldn't want to work at. Plus, as I said, you made a point of not wanting to hire someone like you think I'm like, though I've made it clear that it would be illegal for you to hire me. That you think there are enough of you to matter in the work place also makes you a pompous ass. That you think your personal experience is somehow representative (despite the fact it's directly contradictory to the statistics available) makes you a pompous ass. And that you think I'd be upset if I presented my resume in a manner that would improve my chances with the 99% of people who accept resumes in electronic format and hurt my chances with those in the 1% of "other" that are pompous asses makes you a pompous ass. I've never had trouble finding a job, and so I'd choose to not work for a pompous ass.

      So your personal rejection of my resume is irrelevant to the general workplace environment, as well as being completely irrelevant to me personally. There aren't enough people like you to matter for those looking for jobs, and I'd stay away from working for a pompous ass.

    107. Re:Some hardware needs them by hitmark · · Score: 1

      are you sure your not getting two devices mixed? As what your describing sounds like the floppy drive replacement linked to in a different place, while the link i commented on basically is a "floppy" with its internals converted to a flash card reader.

      also, TFM? i probably need to have my geek card renewed but that acronym is unfamiliar to me...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    108. Re:Some hardware needs them by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Really? Now see that sounds odd to me, because all of our computers have floppy drives (at least in engineering). The computer at my last three jobs had floppies too. I've never encountered a workplace without a floppy drive.

      I suppose if somebody didn't have a drive, I'd just let them copy it from my USB keydrive but to date it's never been an issue.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    109. Re:Some hardware needs them by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      One advantage of floppy disks in an industrial environment is that they have a handy little activity LED that you have to wait to go out before removing them. There is no need to unmount the disk before ejecting. Floppy drives are also cheap and easy to replace. We see a lot of home user PCs with mashed USB ports but rarely a failed floppy drive, even when they are a smoker.

      Most CNC equipment uses very low end PC hardware too, and often runs in DOS or Windows 9x for easier hardware access. Updating the software to XP or 7 would be very expensive and require extensive hardware re-design. Few mobos have ISA these days. Embedded systems are not like PCs, there is no reason to replace or upgrade a system that works as long as the supply of 486 class PC/100 mobos doesn't dry up.

      Floppies are old and slow but also cheap and well understood by non-technical people. They remain in use for the same reason people still buy mainframes to run their old COBOL payroll system.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    110. Re:Some hardware needs them by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with being "purposefully obtuse" and everything to do with picking the best system for the job at hand.

      If the "job at hand" is to receive random submissions by the general public, then it either needs to be interoperable with Windows, or it is not the best system for the job at hand.

      But that isn't what my company does...

      As I said, deliberately obtuse.

      There is nothing "obtuse" about it. Yes, it is a deliberate decision, but it was made for solid reasons, not because we wanted to be obtuse.

      You decide what everyone else should be using

      No. I already said - people should be using the right tool for the job they are doing. If Windows is the best thing for you then use Windows, if Linux is the best thing for me I'll use Linux. Someone else might be using OS X, BSD, Solaris, whatever because *it is the best thing for the job they are doing*.

      You are the one deciding that everyone must use Windows and refusing to interact with anyone who doesn't. When I send media to people, I send it in a format that will work on pretty much any system instead of trying to dictate to them what they should be using.

      knowing it's not what they are using

      I don't pretend to know what arbitrary people are using. Assuming they are using the same system as myself would be pretty arrogant, so I try to do things in a platform agnostic way so that it doesn't matter. Frankly, I don't *care* what system someone is using - the only time it becomes important is when dealing with an arrogant individual who insists on dictating that everyone must work the same way.

      then hold it against them if they aren't guessing that you are one of the tiny minority not using Windows.

      Your need to guess what OS someone is using demonstrates a flaw on your part.

      If you want something (e.g. a job), making the people who can give you that thing go unnecessarily out of their way is a pretty silly idea - it isn't as if doing things in a platform agnostic way is hard, it just requires a bit of common sense.

      I guess I am holding a lack of common sense against people - I'm not really interested in employing someone who doesn't have the mental skills to figure this stuff out. Dictating to a potential employer what software they should be using doesn't leave a good impression, in much the same way as submitting a CV scrawled in purple crayon doesn't.

      You sound like a pompous ass.

      Not really. I'm interested in employing people who have the mental ability to do the job. Your CV is part of the process of discovering if a potential employee has got what it takes. A fixed "I use software X so everyone else must use software X" or "you should use software X because everyone else does (rather than it being a good candidate for the job at hand" attitude is a negative strike against you because it demonstrates that your attitude may well not be suited to the job you are applying for.

      This is nothing to do with "being pompous" and everything to do with wanting the best employees.

      "Would you like to explain to me what benefit my company would get from [running windows]?" as a challenge when you don't even tell me what you do?

      I write software to run on Linux servers, and do IPv4 and IPv6 network design, security and problem solving consultancy. Windows is not really useful for any of these things - the tools for these jobs happen to be much better under Unix type systems. Switching to Windows would simply get me a more expensive system with inferior tools.

      That you think your personal experience is somehow representative (despite the fact it's directly contradictory to the statistics available) makes you a pompous ass. And that you think I'd be upset if I presented my resume in a manner that would improve my ch

    111. Re:Some hardware needs them by batquux · · Score: 1

      Good catch. It ought to be possible with SD as well, but I haven't seen such a device yet.

    112. Re:Some hardware needs them by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      E-mu...

      also if you only have SCSI, these work fantastic...

      http://www.reactivedata.com/Products/SCSI_Bridge_Emulators_to_CF/index.php

      I since abandoned all my synths and samples for a single laptop. Why lug a rack full of gear when I get better performance and more options from a laptop. I can get patches for synths that were rare as heck and supports all Midi channels I want, plus a sequencer, etc... Works great with one USB device plugged in to interface to my 2 midi keyboard controllers and 1 midi foot controller.

      I sold 2 roland rack synths for enough cash to buy all the windows apps I needed... Although a buddy has set up the same on a Ubuntu using all free Software synths, apps and jack that does as much as mine does for 2 grand less... I may go his route as he found a ton of free patches. Even a true emulation of the DX7

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    113. Re:Some hardware needs them by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I have a SCSI-to-IDE bridge attached to a 2G flash drive in my ESi4000. It's quick and silent, unlike the rattly old SCSI drive I used to use.

      Funny you should say about going down the hardware route - I used to use softsynths, to the extent of even developing a couple (http://www.nekosynth.co.uk) but have since ditched using computers and gone back to hardware synths, sequencers and samplers. Computers get in your way, and it's too easy to end up trolling /. instead of making music...

    114. Re:Some hardware needs them by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      Sorry TFM = the f***ing manual I understand as usually it is printed as RTFM = Read The F***ing Manual. There was no angst directed at you. As for the device I followed the link you provided and this is the product they were selling. After posting this I read further and they have a corded remote of sorts for selecting the files that are loaded from the flash drive. This would be useful since you could put all your floppies on the flash drive and select which one you wanted loaded into the device memory at that time. My only intention was to provide more information about the device you mentioned as I find it fascinating in theory. I say in theory since most devices I've run into that required say 20 floppies to load the firmware also had a serial port that allowed me to load it that way. But that device would be very useful in certain situations. Like the gentleman who had to load designs into his fabrication machinery.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    115. Re:Some hardware needs them by hitmark · · Score: 1

      err, my posting contain no links at all. also, my initial comment that yours is attached to was about the floppy to smart media converter, not the replacement drive with a usb and rj-45 port.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    116. Re:Some hardware needs them by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I've always though putting a portfolio on one of those cut down business-card format mini CDs would be a nice tough

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    117. Re:Some hardware needs them by snadrus · · Score: 1

      I've worked with one of those CNC machines. It ran DOS 3. I tried DOSBox, FreeDos, even DOS 7, 6, 5, no go. Their program to ISA card stuff only worked with DOS 3 quirks. Oh, and network libraries back then weren't worth it.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    118. Re:Some hardware needs them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But that isn't what my company does...

      Oh. You implied that your company does its own hiring. Since you have corrected me, that means that you don't do your own hiring, so your views are irrelevant.

      When I send media to people, I send it in a format that will work on pretty much any system instead of trying to dictate to them what they should be using.

      Funny, when I send stuff, I actually ask them, rather than dictating what they *should* be using, as you are. Again, you've only said things that indicate you are a pompous ass, and nothing that indicates otherwise. There's nothing I hate more than when someone sends me a GIS file in what they assume is the most interoperable, rather than just asking. Or sending a network diagram in the interoperable but difficult to edit PDF, rather than seeing what I'd prefer. But then, those are people I have an existing relationship with. You dictate what they should be using by unilaterally deciding what will work on pretty much any system, and whining about it if anyone else makes such a decision themselves.

      You are the one deciding that everyone must use Windows and refusing to interact with anyone who doesn't.

      Wait, you want people to open it, but you aren't assuming that the vast majority of computers have Windows installed on them? That's just crazy. I don't declare they "must" use Windows. I declare they *are* using Windows. It's like the banks that build their sites for Windows only. They lose so few customers over it (if any) that they are still making plenty of money. They don't declare that everyone is using Windows. They recognize that almost everyone is, and those that aren't know they are fringe, and so they can make something Windows only and still make plenty of money off it.

      A CD written in XP or later by drag and drop of a DOC file can be read on more computers than a PDF burned with ISO 9660. But you've decided that "popular" is not the same as your definition of "pretty much any system."

      Lets look at the example you were originally replying to - assume that Windows XP's CD burner used "some dodgy packet writing format" that was only supported in Windows (since this was what the original post was asking about and you said you didn't care).

      Oh, so you are going to assume a lie as your premise in order to prove me wrong? Why not go with the truth? If Windows made it and made it proprietary (like the DOC format) then all other systems on the planet change themselves to work with them (OO including DOC support). You are presuming not only my "I don't care" statement means that it is Windows-only, but that no one else will ever try to support it. Both presumptions are wrong. "I don't care" means that I know that the world will change to work with Windows, as your preferred Linux distro does. And I'm right.

      The only way you are right is if your presumptions are lies and incomplete ones at that. Again, pompous ass.

      And yet there are people complaining about a shortage of jobs.

      So? One of the reasons is that people don't take jobs they don't want. I hear "unemployment" and see "help wanted" signs at McDonald's. How could that possibly be? Well, people looking for jobs would rather be unemployed and continue looking, than interrupt their job search for what will end up being a temporary job at a crappy place they don't want to really work at. And that's what would happen if I were to work for a pompous ass like you. so I have good company in not wanting a crappy job working for some git who can't even grasp the concept that "Windows only" is usable on almost all non-Windows systems, and not caring if someone refuses to support the most ubiquitous system. And yes, at this point, it pretty much takes effort to not support Windows, so if you are proud of not supporting Windows, then you burn time and energy worrying about it. If you don't, then your response is exactly the same as mine you have been continually bashin

    119. Re:Some hardware needs them by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      the issue isn't just the running of windows, something i apparently wasn't clear enough about to satisfy fanbois like you. the issue is installing a particular version of windows and then *not* supporting your software application and its interaction with the application specific peripherals (Logic analyzer cards, oscilloscope analog front end, ADCs, etc. when the user takes the perfectly rational step of turning on windows' security updating functionality. basically you are leaving a box on your network for any script kiddie with a 3 year old copy of metasploit to use as a beach head in your network. and depending on the equipment vendor and their/your requirements for network connectivity, your firewall may not help you.

      Oh, and after Windows posts a 10 year history with 5 exploitable kernel vulnerabilities then i'll consider it as sercure and worthwhile as FreeBSD. Not until.

      But aside from that metric, the reason you ought to use a Unix is the ability to scrape out the cruft that only presents vulnerabilities to attackers. most SCADA systems don't need to share files or printers, but the windows distribution does not allow you to strip that functionality out. Unixes (especially FOSS ones) do.

      Trusted IRIX or Trusted Solaris would be equally palatable. So would Green Hills' Integrity RTOS.

      The last one has met Common Criteria EAL 7 evaluation requirements. Windows has not, nor can it. Ever.

      And i'm not talking about your user devices, however much you'd like to refocus the debate there. I'm talking about embedded devices and SCADA. There's not much need to browse Youtube on a machine that is controlling a region of the power grid. And there shouldn't be the ability to. The last thing we need is for someone's social networking BS to cause a blackout by crashing that machine.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    120. Re:Some hardware needs them by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Oh. You implied that your company does its own hiring. Since you have corrected me, that means that you don't do your own hiring, so your views are irrelevant.

      We do, but that is a tiny part of the company's business. And no, we don't have an HR department.

      Funny, when I send stuff, I actually ask them

      Really? That's at odds with what you already said - you previously said that you didn't care if the media you sent could only be used on Windows, and you based this on the explicit assumption that the people you sent it to would be using Windows rather than asking them first.

      rather than dictating what they *should* be using, as you are.

      No, really I'm not. If you think I am then you clearly need to go educate yourself what the term "platform agnostic" means.

      You stated that you would happily send content that could only be used by Windows machines because you made the assumption that the recipient would always be using Windows. This means you are dictating to people what you expect them to use to read content that you sent.

      On the other hand, I said that this assumption is not valid and that it would be more sensible to use a platform agnostic format. I did not state or dictate what OS the recipient would be using and I did not state or dictate what OS you would be using. If you are using a platform agnostic format then these things are irrelevant.

      There's nothing I hate more than when someone sends me a GIS file in what they assume is the most interoperable, rather than just asking.

      Asking is fine, but you didn't say that - instead, you said that you expected the recipient to always use Windows.

      Also, remember we're talking about a CV here, not a GIS file. There are different criteria at work here - if you are sending someone something informational, such as a CV then sending it in a read only presentation format is fine (in fact, a good idea - I sure as hell don't want someone editing my CV, intentionally or otherwise). If you're sending someone something that you expect them to need to edit then sending it in an uneditable format would be pretty silly.

      You dictate what they should be using by unilaterally deciding what will work on pretty much any system

      I'm not making any such decision. The decision is made by what software is available for each platform. Going back to the example given in the original post, ISO9660 format can be read by practically every system with a CDROM drive, UDF less so and the unspecified Windows-XP-only format originally proposed would clearly be worse. None of these are my decisions - this is simply a case of looking at what the most widely supported format is. Clearly ISO9660 is the most sensible format - it does not exclude anyone who could have read one of the other formats and it includes extra people who couldn't. The only reasons for distributing your CV in an unspecified windows-only format instead of ISO9660 are lazyness, cluelessness or an intentional effort to reduce the number of people who can read the content - all three of these reasons seem like pretty silly ones if you're applying for jobs.

      Wait, you want people to open it, but you aren't assuming that the vast majority of computers have Windows installed on them?

      No. I would want people to open it and I don't care what OS they are using because I would be using a platform agnostic format. Platform agnostic means that it doesn't matter what OS they are using. What the majority of computers are running is irrelevant.

      I declare they *are* using Windows.

      And the existence of companies that don't use Windows proves you wrong.

      It's like the banks that build their sites for Windows only. They lose so few customers over it (if any) that they are still making plenty of money.

      Sure, but what do they gain fro

    121. Re:Some hardware needs them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Really? That's at odds with what you already said - you previously said that you didn't care if the media you sent could only be used on Windows, and you based this on the explicit assumption that the people you sent it to would be using Windows rather than asking them first.

      I don't ever cold-send anything to anyone. If I did, I'd use the common tools on the common platform. Someone would have to go out of their way to not support it, and so I wouldn't care about searching out what that last 1% uses and try to get something just for them.

      Pretty much every system with a CD ROM drive can read ISO9660. Less systems can read UDF. Also remember that this discussion was about an unspecified windows-XP-only CD format, which reduces the number of systems further.

      I don't care what you think you want to turn the discussion into. My comment was about disk format and file format. You responded to one and only one. I asserted that I believe there are more computers out there which can read XP's drag and drop with a DOC on it than an ISO 9660 burned PDF. If you wish to disagree, please disagree with what I said, not what you think I meant or what you find more convenient to disagree with.

      No. But if I wasn't able to easily open the document then that would certainly count against you (and there is a limit where I would just give up and throw it in the bin if it was going to be too time consuming for me to open it).

      But you *can* open the documentation. You are arguing against reality with some fabricated hypothetical situation that does not now and never has existed. You are taking "I don't care" then extrapolating that to an unrealistic scenario where Windows makes everything closed, proprietary, and no one else can read it. The reality is that if I did what I said, that you'd be able to read it just fine. And so would almost everyone else on the planet. And you object to my attitude regarding Windows being the de facto standard. But it is. So I'm right. You can't argue facts against my attitude. They two are unrelated.

      Sure, but what do they gain from restricting their sites to Windows?

      Lowered support costs. Lowered development costs. And the beancounters assert that those lower costs more than offset the cost of any lost customers. You whine about the right tools for the job, and when someone else decides what they are, you object. You don't sound like you think Windows could ever be the right tool for the job. So again, you pretend to be evaluating everything evenly with logic, but it just comes across as zealotry. Beancounters paid lots of money made decisions that disagree with you, but you know bank's business plans better than they do so you know they are wrong because locking in something to Windows could *never* be the right choice, right?

      There are also other good reasons for not sending out Word documents, such as the embedded meta data which is frequently not stripped and has caused embarrassments for governments and organisations with some frequency. Whether or not you strip it, the use of Word format for this purpose does increase the likelihood of these sorts of mistakes being made and that may count against you - picking the most appropriate technology for the job in hand is important.

      So, because there's more chance of mistakes with DOC, I should use PDF? Like no one has ever screwed up the redact feature in that. Or released a PDF thinking they are uneditable and run into problems with that. No, such mistakes are solely in the camp of Microsoft file formats. Are you sure you aren't a zealot? You said you weren't, but then everything that you say lines up 100% with zealotry.

      That's pretty arrogant - many of the MS features are inferior to similar features on non MS systems, and almost all of the MS formats are badly documented (if they are documented at all). You're expecting someone to go out of their way to reverse engineer and implement a system which is prob

    122. Re:Some hardware needs them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Universities and Research labs tend to buy them in bulk.
      They go bad just as easily and it is just nice to have packs of 3.5" floppies lying around.

      Although today's pulse generators and oscilloscopes might want to have a direct connection to a PC with usually a proprietary software to get data - I kind of find it bitter-sweet to still use a floppy. The data stored is in a really simple CSV format usually and there is minimal bloat.

  3. 3rd world countries by stjobe · · Score: 0

    People in 3rd world countries, I'd imagine.

    --
    "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    1. Re:3rd world countries by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      If only you'd read the article before posting that....

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:3rd world countries by lyinhart · · Score: 1

      People in 3rd world countries, I'd imagine.

      From the article:

      But what about all the second-hand computers that are donated to the developing world? Could they be even partly responsible for the thousands of disks still sold?

      Anja Ffrench of Computer Aid International - the largest charity working to distribute recycled IT to Africa and South America - says that they only deal in computers from 2002 and later, meaning that they'll have the USB connection that obviates the need for floppies.

      --
      Freedom is drinking a beer in the park when you're supposed to be at work.
    3. Re:3rd world countries by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      VHS tapes are still used en masse in security systems. But I really am struggling to think of any reason to buy floppies en masse. Even poor countries would be better off buying flash storage because of how expensive floppies are for what you get.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    4. Re:3rd world countries by srlapo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, I have to use them actually. It is the only way to pay multilateral income taxes in Argentina. You have to stand in line at an actual bank for an hour and present the teller with some printed forms and a diskette with the form file (and the money of course). And no, you can't use a flashdrive, electronic transfer or anything else. You have to use a freaking 3.5 inch dikette. It's like going back to the last century. Of course the damned things keep failing every other month so I have to buy more and more.
      It doesn't help that the software to make those forms is the old DOS version with some library changes to make it work on windows. UAC sure loves it... (not)

    5. Re:3rd world countries by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Considering how fantastically reliable 3.5" floppies are, do you believe anyone ever makes any effort to read those disks you submit?

    6. Re:3rd world countries by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      only horribly out of date stuff or really low end. for the past 4 years you have only been able to buy Digital security recorders, any VHS based ones are low grade china junk.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:3rd world countries by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I love those security tapes. 12 hours on a single tape and in near-DVD quality (Super VHS). True my DVR can do more hours but not dvd quality, and there's no way to store what I record, whereas the tapes fit on a convenient shelf.

      And in case someone objects and says "SVHS isn't DVD quality":
      - DVD == 480 lines horizontal resolution x 480 scanlines
      - SVHS== 420 lines horizontal resolution x 486 scanlines
      Close enough. I can't see any difference.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:3rd world countries by stjobe · · Score: 1

      Clarification: There's likely more old computer hardware in 3rd world countries than here - not all of them have gotten their computers from Computer Aid International, you know.

      Also, I'd imagine that computers in 3rd world countries have a bit of a longer lifetime than here, which also makes using floppies likelier.

      The article only discusses one charity and only computers donated by them, not computers bought in-country years ago that still serve a purpose.

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    9. Re:3rd world countries by srlapo · · Score: 1

      They have to do it on front of you actually.
      But that is not the point. I am not the only one that has to pay that tax, so everyone else is in the same boat regarding the purcharse of floppy disks. All because a comitee of provincial politicians can't be bothered to accept electronic payment of this particular tax. Every other tax can be paid with online banking.
      So one of the reasons the purchase of outdated floppy disks keeps going, at least in Argentina, is because of a comitee of politicians. That was the intent of my original post.

    10. Re:3rd world countries by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Lots of places never want to upgrade once they have something that works.

          A few years ago, I had a neighboring company come over with a VHS tape from their security camera, and the police. They asked me to burn some of the footage off to DVD. :) The police didn't have anything to play VHS with any more. He was just there to confirm the chain of custody. Our video guy still had his VHS equipment, but hadn't actually used it in years. It took about an hour, but we got them taken care of. I have no idea what the crime was. They just wanted the guys face as he walked by the camera.

          As far as I know, they're still using the same security equipment. Occasionally, I see the same type of stuff in other places. When I ask "why are you using that ancient stuff?", they always tell me it's because it still works.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:3rd world countries by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      It's Slashdot here. Nobody RTFA before posting.

    12. Re:3rd world countries by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      You can't see the tape stretch and the bleeding chroma on SVHS? Man, I wish I had your eyes. Well, actually I don't.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    13. Re:3rd world countries by Amouth · · Score: 1

      Last time i had to use it was for flashing a RAID card's bios..

      but here at work we have to use them for the same type of thing - we have to send in our unemployment tax documents on a floppy..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    14. Re:3rd world countries by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I have an EE degree. What's a good 2nd degree to get? CMP ENG or Comp Sci? I can't decide.

      Comp Eng would be more along the lines of the EE, you learn some comp sci, and it teaches you more about the low level like device drivers; also you probably already have half the credits.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    15. Re:3rd world countries by dskzero · · Score: 1

      This actually something really curious: They became less and less reliable as time went on. Perhaps it was some sort of magic frustration we had that damaged them, or the hardware was less reliable. I remember trying to pass Tales of Phantasia and the emulator back in school to my friends and we needed about 4 or five floppies. I left it uncompressing and tried all sort of tricks to pray that it didn't died on me. It was a pain in the ass.

      --
      Oblivion Awaits
    16. Re:3rd world countries by jimicus · · Score: 1

      QA on disks went totally down the toilet circa 1996-1998 IIRC.

      Prior to then, they were reasonably reliable, but any disks much more recent than that are so unreliable as to be borderline unusable for anything that requires any degree of integrity.

  4. Not so legacy hardware... by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

    In my department, we have no fewer than 72 machines that are about five years old and are in perfect working order for what we need. They are not quite legacy, but at the same time, you can't boot off USB. Optiplex 2xx series, go figure. The best way for us to get a new image on these machines is frequently to use a floppy or a USB floppy on some machines, again, go figure. There are a lot of oddball cases out there, but we probably still go through fifty floppies a year through all the departments.

    1. Re:Not so legacy hardware... by couchslug · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oddly, many machines that _should_ boot off CD when selected in BIOS don't want to cooperate with (properly burned at slowest speed/good media, yadda yadda) CD/DVD booting.

      I keep a Smart Boot Manager

      http://btmgr.sourceforge.net/about.html

      floppy for those, and they'll often boot from CD/DVD when selected in the Smart Boot Manager (which can also be loaded to hard disk) menu.

      Why? Beats the shit out of me, but it has worked on many machines over the years.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Not so legacy hardware... by kevmatic · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the BIOSes only give the drives a couple of seconds to respond with the CD information and sometimes the drive doesn't make it in time. I usually get around situations like the ones you've mentioned by warm booting a couple of times. Relatively speaking, optical drives frequently take an eternity to respond.

    3. Re:Not so legacy hardware... by josath · · Score: 1

      Weird, I've booted self-burned CDs in dozens of machines over the past 10 years and never had a problem. You must just be unlucky.

      --
      sig? uhh, umm, ok
    4. Re:Not so legacy hardware... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I've booted Linux, Windows install, and WinPE-ish CD/DVDs successfully (many times, with the SAME CD/DVDs), yet some machines don't play well even with warm booting, inserting the CD during POST so it's spinning when detected, etc.

      I'm thinking it might be some brands of CD drive, but I'd not checked the brands to be sure.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Not so legacy hardware... by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      I've found that many BIOSes (BIOSen?) have some sort of Quick Boot option that is enabled by default and is often the culprit for this sort of thing.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
  5. oldies by theblackarrow0 · · Score: 0

    Who is buying them?? My Grandpa!!

  6. There is a gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that scientists were trying to invent a gas, maybe they are using flopppy disks to save the results of their research? Linux would make it easy to create a floppy RAID array cheaply to store gas-related data on?

    1. Re:There is a gas by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      You may laugh, but we once set up a 4-floppy RAID 5 drive over 4 computers connected using NBD. The whole thing crashed horribly when we ejected one of the floppies.

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
  7. Floppies by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know we buy them at my lab-they are necessary for controlling the software of our scintillation counter. That thing (no joke) is running DOS 2.0 under the hood! I'm sure there's lots of industrial equipment in small/noncompetitive markets that has never felt pressured to update. It's the same reason why we have so much $500,000 equipment running unbelievably crappy software.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      True. I've used medical lab equipment (hematology and chemistry analyzers) which ran its software directly from a 3.5" floppy. I was bored one day and pulled the disk out and dumped an image of it. Turns out it was running 'EDOS' (embedded DOS?) with Intel binaries. Never did much with it, breaking a $15,000 machine and getting fired didn't seem worth it.

    2. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a medical equipment manufacturer that just rewrote some of their embedded device software from DOS to Windows (XP maybe? I dunno). There was actually no technical reason for doing it: the software worked fine. They only did it so that competitors couldn't say "They use DOS!" :-)

    3. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Some of the stuff even uses 5.25" floppys. The instruments are old, but they work fine

    4. Re:Floppies by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually there are some good reasons to use DOS for something like that.
      Modern OSs are great and have all sorts of functionality that a lot of devices just don't need. They also have a lot of code and services which can cause you issues.
      DOS is great for any device where you need a realtime single tasking OS.
      You can do all you development on a PC and use PC debugging tools that you are used to using.
      You see lots of CNC machines and such that use DOS for that reason.
      Or look at it this way. Does the device you use work? Does it do what you need it to do?
      If so then the software isn't crappy. Nothing sucks more than you replace a piece of software that works but isn't pretty with pretty bug ridden software.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Floppies by gnieboer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...crappy software.

      Would you really rather have that $500,000 piece of equipment running DOS 2.0 move to Windows Vista?

      When was the last time your DOS 2.0 machine needed a security patch, or rebooted itself randomly, to for that matter did anything unexpected?
      Simple... yes
      Outdated... yes
      Crappy... not so much.

    6. Re:Floppies by pz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wrote a real-time data acquisition system about 10 years ago. It was written to run on DOS. Why? One, and only one reason: under DOS, you have complete control of the hardware. Total, utter control. There's no OS that's going to interrupt with housekeeping, respond to network packets, check to see if there's another thread that wants a slice, or other crap. Only one thread executes at a time (unless you work really really hard to allow that to happen). For instrumentation that cannot tolerate a 20, 50 or even 100 ms pause every now and then, this is vital. DOS, crappy though parts of it are, has a lot of support in the embedded / instrumentation market. It isn't a lack of pressure to update so much as the ability to do exactly what you want, no questions asked, with the hardware. Worked great. As far as I know, that system is still in operation.

      More recently, I've written a different real-time data acquisition system, under Windows 98. Almost as much control of the hardware, but not quite. There were gremlins I never figured out that were stealing segments of time every now and then.

      And just this year, I ported that second system to Windows XP. Holy crap. Still haven't had time to chase down all of the HUGE number of timing problems now. If W98 drivers were available for the fast modern hardware required for the current project, I'd have stuck with the older OS.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    7. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use QNX instead of Windows?

    8. Re:Floppies by cpghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Add to this, that many embedded platforms still use cheap 8086 CPUs. Try running anything bigger than an old version of DOS on that! Of course, a stripped down version of Unix v7 (or so), Minix etc.. would run too, but if it's single threaded, DOS is good enough.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    9. Re:Floppies by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I've also found that the more specialized a hardware or software system, the crappier the quality. And not just "in house" stuff. People dump on Microsoft, but until you see some of the other stuff out there, there's no comparison. And it's more scandalous when you consider some of it costs orders of magnitude more than Office.

      Software that crashes if the system is locked, software that by default tries to save data files in the program subdirectory, the "rotate left" command rotates right, "undo" erases have your data and replaces it with something from this morning. On the backend I've seen software that requires sticking with an outdated version of Windows server, etc.

    10. Re:Floppies by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      ...under DOS, you have complete control of the hardware.

      But that's an application requirement, not an illustration of the failures of other operating systems. Complete and total control of the hardware isn't generally a good thing to give users who need to do various and sundry computing tsaks. In, hhoever, a process control application, a non-predictive OS is totally inappropriate. Using XP for these kinds of applications is not a good idea, and I'm surprised any engineer would try to make it happen. In my own company we are just now getting away from using DOS in our products and moving to a Linux-based RTOS. Machine bit width was the main reason I think. XP for RTOS applications? Really?? Why?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    11. Re:Floppies by confused+one · · Score: 1

      As you've alluded to, you really can't run real-time on Windows. DOS was great for that and is still available (FreeDOS and DR-DOS), IF you can find necessary hardware drivers. Where you used to be able to use DOS as an acceptable platform, these days you're sort of forced to move to linux and tear it down to where it's safe for real-time, or move to a (designed for use as) real-time OS like QNX or VxWorks.

      Still miss it on occasion though -- I learned to code on 6502, Z80 and 8086 machines.

    12. Re:Floppies by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Why not use QNX instead of Windows?

      HAHAHAHA

      Don't take me wrong, QNX is great.

      Except most engineers won't even take a look at it since DOS 'works'

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    13. Re:Floppies by pz · · Score: 1

      ...under DOS, you have complete control of the hardware.

      But that's an application requirement, not an illustration of the failures of other operating systems. Complete and total control of the hardware isn't generally a good thing to give users who need to do various and sundry computing tsaks. In, hhoever, a process control application, a non-predictive OS is totally inappropriate. Using XP for these kinds of applications is not a good idea, and I'm surprised any engineer would try to make it happen. In my own company we are just now getting away from using DOS in our products and moving to a Linux-based RTOS. Machine bit width was the main reason I think. XP for RTOS applications? Really?? Why?

      In an ideal world, I'd love to be doing this on a real RTOS. External constraints, primarily budgetary, prevent that.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    14. Re:Floppies by dnahelicase · · Score: 1
      "The CNC machine told me it was infected with viruses. I did an update, rebooted it, and then put ANTIVIRUS XP PRO on and it cleared up 78 viruses! It is annoying now that it is networked, since these viruses keep popping up in the middle of production runs, but ANTIVIRUS XP PRO clears off 70-80 viruses a day! If only IT would improve their firewalls on the server, I wouldn't have to go to these lengths clearing off viruses every day."

      Sorry, just daydreaming about our production equipment being on the network...

    15. Re:Floppies by JiffyPop · · Score: 1

      "... And now for some reason every third sheet of steel gets cut in the shape of a giant c*** and balls."
      Sorry, just imagining what a virus would want to do on a CNC machine. Although, if I ever get disgruntled enough I could have the laser cut an 8ft c*** out of 1/4in steel as a parting gift. Maybe I should get the G-Code together for that...

    16. Re:Floppies by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Sucktastic or no, you don't have a choice in certain applications. For example, in a military setting it might cost a few million dollars just to update the document that specs the system that says you have to use a floppy disk and DOS 2.0. That's because they have to run a battery of tests on any new hardware to make sure it'll work and be secure in combat conditions. Even the network cables have to be certified. If your network cable dies and you have a choice between waiting a week while a certified network cable is flown in or going down to Best Buy and buying one there... you wait the week. Arguably government certified network cables cost less than Best Buy ones, but that's a different post.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    17. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh.

      DOS is a terrible OS! Scripting in it is atrocious, the filesystem is crippled, and I imaging setting up a development environment for it on a modern system is unnecessarily complex. Why not run a stripped-down Linux or BSD with restricted userspace tools? Many embedded devices are built like this; the platform offers use of proper scripting languages (Perl, Python), choice of proper filesystem, and a kernel capable of aiding in real debugging tasks.

      Live in the now!

    18. Re:Floppies by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Understood. Difficult to find off the shelf stuff for free, but there's this; http://www.lynuxworks.com/embedded-linux/embedded-linux.php

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    19. Re:Floppies by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I wonder what Windows 7/XP would be like if it never bothered running any of its own tasks (while supposedly nothing was happening), and never bothered accessing the HD (which is always flickering).

      Annoying latencies would be a thing of the past, and you could code a realtime app on it like you would need. I bet there would hardly be any disadvantages.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    20. Re:Floppies by vbraga · · Score: 1

      There are extensions that substitutes WinXP HAL with something else to achieve hard real time. I don't know how well it works or why it would be the best choice for a project, but it does exists.

      Take a look at it: Hard Real-Time with Venturcom RTX on Microsoft Windows XP and Windows XP Embedded.

      The articles cites some possible reasons.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    21. Re:Floppies by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sinple.
      1. DOS is REAL-TIME. If you need to precise timeing and access to the hardware DOS gives that to you.
      2. Scripting? Filesystem? who cares on a small devise. You may not do anything with the filesystem at all. You may just write the data out to the serial port on some devices.
      Development Tools? DJGPP works fine. Borlands old tools are available for free. No problem and actually not complex.
      "Why not run a stripped-down Linux or BSD with restricted userspace tools?"
      Can you find me one that will.
      Run in 256k of ram.
      On an 8086.
      and support Real-time data acquisition?

      You can get 8086 embedded controlers for dirt cheap.
      And the nice thing about DOS is that it is completely known.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    22. Re:Floppies by initialE · · Score: 1

      http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantstorage/drives-enclosures/usb-floppy-drive-key/index.html
      This device loads storage controller drivers on to fresh installs of windows 5.x. It does it through emulating a usb floppy drive.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    23. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote a real-time data acquisition system about 10 years ago. It was written to run on DOS. Why? One, and only one reason: under DOS, you have complete control of the hardware. Total, utter control. There's no OS that's going to interrupt with housekeeping, respond to network packets, check to see if there's another thread that wants a slice, or other crap. Only one thread executes at a time (unless you work really really hard to allow that to happen). For instrumentation that cannot tolerate a 20, 50 or even 100 ms pause every now and then, this is vital. DOS, crappy though parts of it are, has a lot of support in the embedded / instrumentation market. It isn't a lack of pressure to update so much as the ability to do exactly what you want, no questions asked, with the hardware. Worked great. As far as I know, that system is still in operation.

      More recently, I've written a different real-time data acquisition system, under Windows 98. Almost as much control of the hardware, but not quite. There were gremlins I never figured out that were stealing segments of time every now and then.

      And just this year, I ported that second system to Windows XP. Holy crap. Still haven't had time to chase down all of the HUGE number of timing problems now. If W98 drivers were available for the fast modern hardware required for the current project, I'd have stuck with the older OS.

      DOS is not an RTOS. If you understand RMS scheduling you can use a real RTOS to do what you want without having the problems you describe.

    24. Re:Floppies by blair1q · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That $500k may have been the price when it was new in 1992.

      But if you try to sell it now you might get 79 cents a pound for it.

    25. Re:Floppies by Nimey · · Score: 1

      MS-DOS is not a real-time operating system.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    26. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We buy them in my lab too. In my case they are used in a biochemistry analyser. There is literally no way to get data off of the machine short of transcribing the printouts by hand.

    27. Re:Floppies by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      The software itself is an inconsistent mess. Pressing the wrong button at the wrong time can lead to hours of wasted work. It chews through floppies and it also fails spectacularly. So no, the fact that it's running an OS old enough to rent a car is not in and of itself troublesome, but it's just badly written software overall and I would like something more modern.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    28. Re:Floppies by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

      Yep! A few years ago I worked in a lab that was running an emission mass spectrometer from the late '80s. The software was all run off of a 5.25" floppy with some early version of MS-DOS. I don't recall whether they had a backup, but for their sake I certainly hope so...

    29. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was watching the TV show "How It's Made" one day and did a double take when I saw an Apple II (probably either a + or e) in a factory. Look for the episode with the player piano rolls.
      If it ain't broke and you don't have to fix it you still get to buy the antiquated media for it. :)

    30. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And the nice thing about DOS is that it is completely known.

      Yes, its fully FLOSS, unlike the *BSDs or GNU/Linux setups out there.

      Oh wait.

    31. Re:Floppies by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We are talking about software here not religion.

      But there is FreeDOS which is probably what a good number of these DOS like embedded systems are running. Frankly that is why I didn't say MS-DOS. A lot of people use FreeDOS for this kind of work now. Some use DR-DOS and still others used MS-DOS. Frankly I would use FreeDOS myself unless there is some good reason not to but that is just me.
      Please at this point you are just being silly. Linux is overkill for something like a CNC controller or radiation counter.
      Plus for many of these applications it just will not work. Educate yourself just a little and you might actually stop wasting peoples time.
      BTW if you need something that has a bit more capability than DOS does but still lighter than Linux there are options.
      RTEMS will work for realtime systems but it is a lot more complex to set up than DOS but it runs on more CPUs and is general more flexible.
      Another option is Contiki http://www.sics.se/contiki/about-contiki.html
      But again the thing about DOS is simply so many people know everything there is to know about it. It is super well documented and the Development tools are everywhere and well known.
      If you don't like DJCPP or the free Borland toolset you still have a ton of options left open including http://www.freepascal.org/
      Linux is a great embedded tool when you need it. The thing is for a lot of tasks it is overkill and frankly just will not do the job as reliably and as cheaply as good old DOS will.
      So go read up and and stop treating FOSS as a religion and start using it as a tool. And stop being a tool.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    32. Re:Floppies by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Sure it is... No really but it is very determinant because your task never has to surrender to another task or frankly to the OS. You can make it very close to real time without the complexity of a real time OS.
       

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    33. Re:Floppies by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Embedded linux. Tweak the kernel to your hearts content.

      Something like uClinux might fit the bill, depending on what you're doing.

    34. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and when is the last time your DOS 2.0 machine could run half the applications of a modern smart phone?

      The reason your DOS 2.0 machines don't need security patches: it doesn't have anything anyone is looking for. There's not a huge number of people looking for dark exploits into that secret DOS 2.0 machine that's running this vital thing or that thing.
      The reason your DOS 2.0 machines aren't randomly rebooting: you're not asking it to understand the scope and depth of actions that a modern machine is doing.

      Things that make my Windows XP (talk about a fuddy-duddy!) randomly crash are essentially modern developments. Some idiot had a new idea for a javascript or flash do-dad and foisted it into a browser that didn't know what to do with it, or a programmer thought their new application was more polished than it was.

      While that $500,000 machine has no doubt been finely tuned to do certain things, and nothing else, on DOS 2.0, the same would be said if I built a $500,000 machine finely tuned to do certain things, and nothing else, on Windows 7.

      Oh, and my DOS 2.0 machine was more than capable of doing unexpected things.

    35. Re:Floppies by lennier · · Score: 1

      We are talking about software here not religion.

      I don't understand this concept.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    36. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because DOS isn't even an OS, really. A DOS program basically just runs on the bare metal. Sure it can call INT 80 routines if it wants to but there's nothing saying you have to. Essentially all of DOS is just a set of library routines a program may access or ignore as needed. That's why it's so flexible and lightweight.

    37. Re:Floppies by ZosX · · Score: 1

      "Arguably government certified network cables cost less than Best Buy ones, but that's a different post."

      Are you kidding?! Fuck a gallon of fuel costs them $400. In Iraq! Where they are pumping oil! Efficiency is not the military's strongest point.

    38. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprisingly, some XP and later drivers will work under Win98. How do I know? It's how I got a WiFi PCI card to work on an old relic of a laptop. It was just a matter of finding the missing vxd and dll files in 98 and copying them over from XP's Win32 on another computer. (It's annoying when the WiFi card had Win98 on the box, but didn't have any working drivers or installer for it.) I wasn't worried of them breaking anything, since the desired network functionality of that laptop was nonexistant anyways until that "experiment". Of course YMMV.

      Interestingly enough, that process was a good use for the old 1.44MB floppy. :)

      Now if you're doing something for commercial reasons, then you probably wouldn't be able to get away with a driver hack that's acceptable to a home user. More likely for legal software license-related rather than technical reasons.

    39. Re:Floppies by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yep and sometimes that is exactly what you need.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    40. Re:Floppies by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually after reading a bit of your livejournal my head really started to hurt so. It is just to early in the day for that.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    41. Re:Floppies by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Its not quite so much that its not crappy as that just about every single bug has been elucidated at this point because, honestly, just about every single instruction has been gone over by many many interested parties, and an incredible number of systems have been built on it. There's something to be said for experience (this is one of the same reasons that POSIX/UNIX is actually quite useful, its not that its perfect its that its so well understood everyone knows its design tradeoffs and general bugs/misfeatures well enough to deal with it without significant overhead, everyone has long since settled on the 'one best way' and anything else is likely reinventing the wheel)

    42. Re:Floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get 8086 embedded controlers for dirt cheap.

      I fail to see why that is important on a $500,000 piece of equipment.

  8. Re:Sony by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sony announced this week they are stopping floppy production soon. Never made /. *sigh*

    You mean this article that never made /.? http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/04/25/0635218/The-End-of-the-35-inch-Floppy-Continues

    You almost read /. less then the moderators.

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  9. Old proceedures by suso · · Score: 1

    There are probably old procedures at companies that still are written to call for using them as backups or storage of application software and the politics at such companies are that they don't easily allow those procedures to be updated.

  10. One possible explanation... by gklinger · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a classic computer enthusiast and I purchase 3.5" disks for use with my various Amiga computers. I know many others who do the same although it seems unlikely that our purchases add up to millions. Honestly, I wasn't sure what all the fuss regarding Sony's discontinuation of the 3.5" floppy was about because there are other manufacturers. One of the larger ones is ATHANA International, Inc. who still make and sell 3.5", 5.25" and even 8" floppy disks.

    1. Re:One possible explanation... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, what exactly do you need the floppies for on the Amigas? Any reasonable sized HDD or CDs + WHDLoad, and you're done in my experience... That said though, despite being an Amiga enthusiast I'm not a gamer at all so this really is a genuine question. I assumed WHDLoad could handle pretty much anything, but I may be wrong.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    2. Re:One possible explanation... by idontgno · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not all Amigas have hard drives, or make it particularly easy to use one. If nothing else, unless you modded it, you'd still need 3.5" DSDD floppies for Kickstart.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:One possible explanation... by gklinger · · Score: 2, Informative

      My primary Amiga (a 1000) does not have a hard disk so floppies are necessary for everything, even to boot Kickstart. I could use a more capable Amiga but my usage is entirely a nostalgic pursuit so I eschew convenience for authenticity. As for WHDLoad, it's a fantastic program but there are some limitations. It's impractical to use WHDLoad on an unaccelerated Amiga without RAM expansion and mass storage which immediately disqualifies the majority of Amigas (my 1000 included) and there are no 'slaves' (WHDLoad's term for game install bundles) for the majority of Amiga games.

    4. Re:One possible explanation... by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Amiga 500 didn't come with a hard drive. And yes it is strictly used for gaming, so everything's booted off floppy.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:One possible explanation... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Yep - was well aware of that... just wasn't aware there were any completely original unmodified A1000s left in the world! Plenty of A500s, but even those are getting rarer in an unmodified form.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    6. Re:One possible explanation... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Speaking of 5-1/4" diskettes, I was recently going to drop an old 5-1/4" drive into my parents' second most recent computer so they could transfer their various 5-1/4"-contained files to 3-1/2" diskettes or to the hard drive. However, it turned out that I had forgotten about the inability of that (and probably all other post-2000) machine to control two floppy drives, and thus it would have meant the sacrifice of the 3-1/2" drive that my dad still used for Quicken backups.

      So, here's a question for you, the floppy diskette enthusiast (and anyone else who has an answer): Is there a company out there that I can ship a box of 5-1/2" diskettes to and receive a USB flash drive containing all their files, one folder per diskette?

    7. Re:One possible explanation... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Mine, in the basement. Set up and running, though.

      Feb 1996 A1000 with a Microbotics Starboard 2 with BATTERY BACKED REAL TIME CLOCK! W00T!

      Pretty much stock. So floppy disks matter to me. You might say that this subject is relevant to my interests.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:One possible explanation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I don't know of any modern machine that *doesn't* have a two-drive floppy controller. Do they even make a one-drive controller??? Just because you have a one-drive cable, doesn't mean the controller is only a one-drive. You could even get a dual-drive off eBay. They only needed a one-drive cable.

    9. Re:One possible explanation... by gklinger · · Score: 1

      I don't know about sending you back a USB flash drive but Floppydisk.com offers a service to transfer the contents of floppy disks to CD (see here). Unfortunately the procedure is expensive, prohibitively so in my opinion ($55 USD for the recovery of 10 floppy disks). Luckily there is a more affordable alternative. The FC5025 is a device that adapts a standard 5.25" floppy disk drive mechanism to USB and comes with software for Windows XP, Mac OS X and Linux. It costs $55.25 USD. Given that you already have a 5.25" mechanism, which aren't easy to find these days, the FC5025 is an affordable solution to your problem.

    10. Re:One possible explanation... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I tried to use a dual-drive cable and it only recognized one drive. And I did try every possible orientation of the cable on all connections, just in case I had it wrong.

    11. Re:One possible explanation... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Those are both apparently good solutions, depending on volume. I'll look into it.

    12. Re:One possible explanation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cable should only work one way, because of the twist in it used to indicate drive number. If the cable didn't have a twist, you used the wrong type of cable. Also, did you enable the second drive in the BIOS?

    13. Re:One possible explanation... by JustNilt · · Score: 1

      There probably is but the cost would be prohibitive, I suspect. I've done this sort of thing for my own clients a few times over the years and it adds up. When possible, I recommend Frankenboxing the thing by sitting the old drive on top of the tower with the side open and they copy the data over a bit at a time when they can. It can take ages with some of those old drives but many'd rather save the $100+ it'd cost to have me do it.

      --
      You know the thing about UDP jokes? I don't care if you get it or not.
    14. Re:One possible explanation... by Follis · · Score: 1

      How about a USB 3.5 floppy drive? They are about 14$

    15. Re:One possible explanation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that have do with what he said???

    16. Re:One possible explanation... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      It had the twist, I installed it correctly, and I went to the BIOS settings, which only had options to enable one floppy drive. I don't know if it's a drive controller or BIOS/firmware thing but this motherboard, manufactured in 2003 IIRC, was not at all fond of having two floppy drives at the same time.

    17. Re:One possible explanation... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a completely valid solution to the problem, if you think about it. Install the 5-1/4" drive on the motherboard's floppy controller and ditch the internal 3-1/2" drive in favor of a USB 3-1/2" sitting on top of the case.

    18. Re:One possible explanation... by znark · · Score: 1

      I assumed WHDLoad could handle pretty much anything, but I may be wrong.

      The problem is, the Amiga has a vast library of software (primarily games and demoscene productions) that boots off directly from a floppy and employs custom disk-loading routines which start off from the bootblock. This was done back in the days when an HDD was seen as an expensive extra.

      At the beginning, the assumption was that most people interested in games would be using the cheaper Amigas, possibly with no HDD, and they would only have a floppy drive or two at their disposal. (The early Amiga models did not come with HDDs as standard.) Custom trackloading routines were also used for copy protection and performance reasons: reading raw data off the tracks and copying it to the memory is faster than if you load the same data by means of files and a filesystem. And, of course, just powering on the machine and inserting a floppy was an intuitive, simple-to-use interface for starting games; akin to the cartridges on the game consoles.

      (The AmigaOS itself, and software normally running under it - tools and utilities, shareware and productivity titles - were always made to be HDD-installable and they utilized a normal filesystem from the beginning, of course. But there's a staggering amount of old games and demos that go with their custom raw disk format and a custom trackloader.)

      Now, WHDLoad - which is essentially a binary patch library for various Amiga software titles - remedies that problem for some titles, by making such older releases HDD-installable and their fixing potential compatibility problems with the newer Amigas and newer AmigaOS versions. The patches might even clean up some badly written software, making them allocate memory properly and even adding clean-up and "quit to the OS" functions, instead of requiring a reboot of the machine after you're done with the game. This is all good, and a great accomplishment, but WHDLoad needs a separate driver (called a "slave" in WHDLoad terms) written for each piece of software it "supports". So it's not a universal solution.

      Also, since the Amiga floppy disk drive controller is very flexible in how it can be programmed, and the AmigaOS normally uses a floppy format that is incompatible, on the sector level, with standard PC floppy controllers (formatting 880 KB on a DD floppy and 1760 KB on an HD floppy), generic products such as the PLR Electronics 3 ½ floppy drive to USB flash drive reader are not likely to work on the Amiga.

      There is an interesting hobbyist DIY hardware project called A Universal Floppy Disk Drive Emulator, however, which aims at making floppy drives redundant on Amigas and many other devices, by replacing them with a floppy disk drive emulator. It is basically the same idea as with the above-mentioned PLR Electronics product, but the project is hobbyist-driven and open, and also guaranteed to be compatible with the low-level sector format that the Amiga normally uses. You can find the schematics and the required software on the linked website.

  11. Re:Sony by Jer · · Score: 1

    Sony announced this week they are stopping floppy production soon. Never made /. *sigh*

    Except for the one story posted about Sony announcing the end of floppy drive production.

  12. You got me. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    It's me. I don't have a DVD or CD burner, so I've been trying to get my pirated material onto other medias.

    I just can't figure out why people don't want the latest Star Trek movie on a simple, small, and affordable 720 three and a half inch floppies collectors set!

    1. Re:You got me. by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Do you have the blu-ray rip??

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  13. Old controllers on test machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of old controllers for things like climate chambers and vibration tables still use floppy disks to save their data, and as long as they're not broken, they aren't going to be replaced in a lot of companies. So, we're stuck with them for at least another 10-15 years.

  14. XP Users by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are about a million XP SP2 users who have SATA disks and keep finding their driver floppy doesn't work when they try their yearly reinstall.

    1. Re:XP Users by nlinecomputers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mod this guy up. There are lots of issues like this that keep me using a usb floppy drive. Some software still use floppies for license disks.

      --
      Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    2. Re:XP Users by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      Google Keyword: "slipstream"

      I would think that anyone smart enough to know about reinstalling XP constantly for performance would know about this. I make unattended install disks for my parents so I don't have to mess with it. Just pop the CD in, boot, format the drive and tell XP to start installing. Then walk away. Almost as nice as installing Linux. :)

    3. Re:XP Users by GhigoRenzulli · · Score: 1

      Slipstreaming doesn't work very well with OEM versions. 1s44c is right, we're stuck with floppies.

    4. Re:XP Users by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      So XP SP3 includes more drivers for SATA / RAID controllers ? Currently using a customer slipstreamed XP SP2 disc with the RAID driver.

    5. Re:XP Users by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      OEM, or not it doesn't matter.

      An OEM install just has a handful of extra files (and possibly drivers) that are dropped into System32 for purposes of pre-registration and confirming a BIOS/hardware match with the distributor/manufacturer (OEM).

      ANd then there's the OEM disks that you buy when you build your OWN machine. That is near identical to a Full-Retail disk.

    6. Re:XP Users by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of 10,000,000 XP users less than 100 of them knows what slipstream is or has the skills to even do that. It will not happen, you can barely get a windows user to not click on every popup, you think you can get them to slipstream SP3 into their XP install Disc?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:XP Users by ramymamlouk · · Score: 1

      No, he meant adding the SATA drivers to you WinXP installation, where you don't need to insert a disk to install your SATA drives. Check out http://www.nliteos.com/

    8. Re:XP Users by BassMan449 · · Score: 1

      No but you can explicitly add the driver to the disk. Search Google for slipstream SATA driver and you'll likely find instructions on how to add the driver.

    9. Re:XP Users by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      Four years ago when I built my PC I was going to leave the FDD out and enter the future... It was a short-lived idea once I found out I needed a floppy disk with the SATA drivers to install XP.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    10. Re:XP Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing like using 25 year old tech to prop up a 10 year old operating system. Seriously, it's long past upgrade time.

    11. Re:XP Users by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Thank MS for delaying the adoption of EFI

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    12. Re:XP Users by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      Troll much? If someone can figure out that they need SATA drivers (as opposed to calling their techie friend, or just disabling AHCI in the BIOS), they can probably figure out how to slipstream drivers in.

    13. Re:XP Users by jittles · · Score: 1

      Why not just slipstream the drivers into your XP install disk? That's what I did for my SATA drivers. Then you can install it all you want without dealing with loading 3rd party drivers. It does it automatically. The whole process takes like 30 minutes.

    14. Re:XP Users by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Parent is right. Nlite helps a lot and makes it much easier to slipstream. I did it to my OEM image a while back when I realized that the floppy drive had died.

    15. Re:XP Users by Thanatos81 · · Score: 1

      Google Keyword: "imaging software" Install XP, install drivers, do image. Next time you feel the urge to reinstall, flip that image into your DVD and save all the hassle with 3rd party drivers.

    16. Re:XP Users by JustNilt · · Score: 1

      Sure, but 4 years ago it was only 21 years old tech to prop up a 6 year old OS and the alternative was Vista (assuming no need/desire/whatever for *nix). One can hardly blame them ... heh.

      --
      You know the thing about UDP jokes? I don't care if you get it or not.
    17. Re:XP Users by robpoe · · Score: 1

      NLite. Will. Save. Your. Life. :)

      --
      = Grow a brain...
    18. Re:XP Users by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Get a USB floppy drive - no need to build it into your machine and you can go around the place installing Windows XP on other machines.

      --
      No sig today...
    19. Re:XP Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yearly install? I reinstall once a month!

    20. Re:XP Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are about a million XP SP2 users who have SATA disks and keep finding their driver floppy doesn't work when they try their yearly reinstall.

      I've never had a problem installing xp sp2 on a computer with SATA disks, what the fuck brand of motherboard are you buying?

    21. Re:XP Users by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      I use HFSLIP - and lazily use NLite to drop in the drivers (into the HFSLIP'ed files).

      Technically, HFSLIP will do the Drivers as well, but that aspect isn't anywheres near as smooth as the HotFix+IE+DX9/etc integration.

      Both, NLite and HFSLIP (main discussion forums and downloads) are located on msfn.org

    22. Re:XP Users by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      Nlite is nice, but a number of drivers have odd issues that require weird hacks when slipstreaming. I always use the mass storage pack from http://driverpacks.net/ after I use nlite but before I create the iso. I have yet to find a system it didn't support, and it keeps from wasting a lot of time and effort when you can reuse the same cd over hundreds of different controllerrs.

    23. Re:XP Users by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 1

      Up until roughly two years ago Cadsoft EAGLE was one of these. Then last year they switched to sending out a CD-R with your licence keyfile on it, and now they're just emailing you a link to the keyfile on their website (and sending the Install Key in a separate email).

      Fun. I'd rather have the CD-R, but it's nice not to have to pay the £5.95 charge for Special Delivery.

    24. Re:XP Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A +4 insightful troll? Lumpy is 100% correct, although I believe he is actually an optimist if he thinks that 100 out of 10 Million can slipstream.
          Sounds like you are the troll. It also sounds like you need to be hit by a "clue-by-four" if you think the average user can slipstream a CD or even install windows. Judging by your UID, you're a 25 year old know nothing in mom's basement.

      P.S. THAT last bit was an actual troll. learn to identify them..

  15. Not According to the Article by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    People in 3rd world countries, I'd imagine.

    If you read the article:

    But what about all the second-hand computers that are donated to the developing world? Could they be even partly responsible for the thousands of disks still sold? Anja Ffrench of Computer Aid International - the largest charity working to distribute recycled IT to Africa and South America - says that they only deal in computers from 2002 and later, meaning that they'll have the USB connection that obviates the need for floppies.

    Instead the article argues that some people are satisfied with using 1.44 MB of storage since they don't do music and photography. They also point out the long life high quality machines like oscilloscopes and data-loggers that use these diskettes. As well as the theater industry and musicians that use them for synths and timing MIDI events. That's their explanation but I doubt that people accepting second hand computers are going to be paying money for obsolete diskettes in third world countries. More likely they're looking for someone giving away old stores of the diskettes with drivers on them and reformatting those.

    Personally, half a year ago I wanted to add my own hard drive to my XBox 360 Arcade and discovered that no matter how I tried to make a DOS boot compact disc it would not work exactly like a 3.5" floppy DOS boot diskette. I luckily had an old keyboard driver on a floppy that I was able to format and use although I may have had to purchase one if I didn't. Although with the increasing ability of flashing my system's BIOS from the OS, my needs for 3.5" floppies are dwindling.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Not According to the Article by sparrowhead · · Score: 1

      Windows XP might be one of the reasons not mentioned in the article. The only way to install 3rd party raid controller drivers, that includes ALL Sata controllers, during XP setup is by supplying them on a floppy.

      Floppies also provided the easiest way to update the BIOS on not too old motherboards.

      In these cases you only need one, maybe two, floppies, but you have to buy them in packages of 10. So for that purpose 5-10 times more floppies are being sold than actually used.

    2. Re:Not According to the Article by josath · · Score: 1

      Actually that's not true, you can add SATA drivers onto your XP setup cd. Of course this requires a separate machine to prepare the CD in advance, but generally if someone is manually installing an OS from scratch that's not sold in stores anymore, they should have the expertise to handle this.

      --
      sig? uhh, umm, ok
    3. Re:Not According to the Article by gorzek · · Score: 1

      I have used nLite (Google it!) to solve exactly this problem, and I had never slipstreamed anything into an XP CD before. It was a remarkably painless process, and I got the SATA drive picked up by the XP setup without issues. I was really dreading the prospect of using a floppy, too, so I was very glad to discover you could slipstream so easily.

  16. Re:Sony by Shakrai · · Score: 2

    You almost read /. less than the editors

    Fixed that for you ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  17. Windows Server Still Asks for drivers from "A" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Microsoft's fault, If you have ever installed a Microsoft server product and needed to add drivers you know what I'm talking about.

    1. Re:Windows Server Still Asks for drivers from "A" by yakatz · · Score: 1

      In Server 2008 (maybe only R2), you can now use a flash drive, so that use is gone.

    2. Re:Windows Server Still Asks for drivers from "A" by afidel · · Score: 1

      Virtual media FTW, on 99% of my server's that's provided by ilo, on the rest it's from the ipkvm.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  18. Servers.... by Shadow_139 · · Score: 1


    In the last year or so you have been able to do the following on a Server with out a Floppy drive:

    Flash/Upgrade BIOS.
    Upgrade RAID Controller Firmware.
    Load RAID / SCSI Controller Drivers into Windows Server OS.


    And this has been replaced with doing to an isolated memory located either on-board or connected internally via SD or USB, but 80% of these are emulating Floppy to boot though.

  19. Re:Sony by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

    Less than the mods, even

  20. Re:Sony by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    People are supposed to read stuff on /.? I thought this was just a running contest to accrue first posts and make jokes about bad car analogies, Soviet Russia, new overlords, Natalie Portman, ??? and PROFIT!

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  21. sneakernet by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    I know of a place that uses floppy disks to move files between the machines on their LAN. And a desktop calculator to fill in Excel spreadsheets.

    1. Re:sneakernet by vlm · · Score: 1

      And a desktop calculator to fill in Excel spreadsheets.

      Well, you can't expect Excel to do everything, and the calculator is pretty good at math, mostly I see Excel used as our corporate-standard relational fully un-normalized DBMS, extensive use as a word processor, page layout system, and as a trouble ticketing system. One time I saw it used as a powerpoint by inserting lots of worksheets.

      The only thing funnier than watching someone do a SQL "JOIN" using Excel as a database, is watching someone do SQL "ORDER BY" using wordpad as a database. Computerization has been effective at keeping people employed, I guess.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:sneakernet by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Excel is starting to catch up to emacs.

  22. some countries are still in the stone age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here in romania, we still have to send our tax delcaration(and some other documents like that) via mail and on floppy disk...theoretically it is possible to send it also via email BUT, i didn't really listen further, my accountant tends to be boring sometimes

  23. Re:Sony by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

    You mean the article that was supplied as a link to this article. D'oh.

    I guess I have settled in to /. too well.

    Rule 1 of Slashdot: Never RTFA
    Rule 2 of Slashdot: Never RTFA

  24. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we can't all read every story, and it's not like that particular story was linked in TFS... oh, wait...

  25. Lighting Consoles by fimion · · Score: 4, Informative

    Numerous Lighting consoles used by theatres and theatrical productions still use floppies. the one specific example is the ETC Express series of boards which while discontinued is still very popular in many theatres around the world.

  26. Security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I store all of my really sensitive data on floppy. Who would ever think to look there?

  27. Puppy Linux from a non-bootable USB BIOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My wife's POS laptop requires a floppy so it can boot Puppy Linux from a USB stick, you insensitive clod!

    Hard drive controller is dead, BIOS doesn't support bootable USB, so it's the only way.

    She just wants to surf the net, and it does that fine!

  28. Oscilloscope by necro81 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got a semi-old (ca 2001) digital oscilloscope. There are only two ways to pull data off it: export a screen shot to a printer via a parallel port, or export to 3.5" floppy (screenshot or raw data). So, I've got a couple of floppies lying around. Can't say I've actually bought any in many years - I just always seem to have a couple lying around. Maybe I ought to just to make sure I've got a supply for the future.

    I suppose I could also replace the scope. Newer ones can connect to a host PC via USB, or offload to a thumb drive, or be network-attached. The specs on newer ones are, obviously, a lot better, too. But, really, why spend many thousands of dollars on new equipment just to get around using a floppy drive?

    1. Re:Oscilloscope by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I've got a semi-old (ca 2001) digital oscilloscope. There are only two ways to pull data off it: export a screen shot to a printer via a parallel port, or export to 3.5" floppy (screenshot or raw data).

      Couldn't you write a real quick program to "pretend" to be a parallel printer, hook a PC up via parallel to it, and then when you "export to printer" from the scope, the PC saves the file directly? It'd be faster than the floppy, and I expect if you've got a PC with a floppy drive lying around, it's also got a parallel port!

      But, really, why spend many thousands of dollars on new equipment just to get around using a floppy drive?

      Definitely true... but if you can spend nothing other than a little time writing a program (which would be a fun little project anyway), it'd definitely be faster.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    2. Re:Oscilloscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Lacroix Waverunner. It runs Windows.

    3. Re:Oscilloscope by vlm · · Score: 3, Funny

      Couldn't you write a real quick program to "pretend" to be a parallel printer, hook a PC up via parallel to it, and then when you "export to printer" from the scope, the PC saves the file directly?

      So, the electrical engineer and the civil engineer walk into the bar, and the EE says... Anyway the CE solution would be to place the in-basket for the scanner directly underneath the slightly modified out-tray of the printer. Because if there's one thing CEs (and plumbers) know, its sh*t flows downhill. I'm sure there's a ME solution in there somewhere involving a medieval catapult.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Oscilloscope by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I've considered it (and the scan-the-hardcopy suggested by another responder). The problem is that both of those only give me data with the resolution of the screen. Saving to floppy gives me the actual numerical data, which is both denser and more accurate than what appears on screen.

    5. Re:Oscilloscope by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Mental note: Buy a Lacroix Waverunner for my crashing oscilloscope demonstration.

    6. Re:Oscilloscope by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Make sure you put the scanner on a wooden table...

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:Oscilloscope by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I have a nice old Tek digital storage oscilloscope, also with a floppy.

      I've considered things like that (even making a little piece of electronics using the excellent FTDI USB FIFO). Perhaps if I needed to lift data off the scope several times a day I'd do it, but I don't take data off the scope that often - so it's not really worth the bother when I've got a machine with a floppy drive right here. (It's the machine with a real parallel port for my JTAG lead too).

    8. Re:Oscilloscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parallel ports went out of production at about the same time floppy drives did. Your next computer won't come with a parallel port.

      Floppys however are not going out of production anytime soon. The floppys will probably become increasingly hard to find and expensive to buy, but they will stay in production as long as people have old machinery and devices that use them.

    9. Re:Oscilloscope by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Parallel ports went out of production at about the same time floppy drives did. Your next computer won't come with a parallel port.

      That was kind of what I was saying... A computer that has an inbuilt floppy drive "from factory" probably also has a built in parallel port. None of my current computers have either. I can add both however (PCI Parellel port card, or USB floppy drive for example) should I choose. If the guy I was replying to has a computer with a factory installed floppy drive, there's a fairly good chance he's got a parallel port too...

      I don't see floppy drives becoming completely extinct for a long time (although, they will get more expensive, as you say). Equally though, I don't see parallel ports becoming completely extinct either for at least the same amount of time. They're used in a LOT of systems still.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  29. Backups by cyp43r · · Score: 1

    How would YOU make secure backups? TAPES? We aren't made of money here!

    1. Re:Backups by ircmaxell · · Score: 1

      So, 1 40gb tape, or 28,444 3.5" disks... I guess it all depends on how much you back up, but comparing a single tape to a milk crate full of disks...

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    2. Re:Backups by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      For the price of one tape writer you can buy like 40 floppy disk drivers... so you can backup in parallel and cut the time a lot.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    3. Re:Backups by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You might be able to run 40 usb tape drives at once, but how would you keep them loaded with fresh disks quickly enough?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  30. Who'd be wasting money on outdated technologies? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 0

    The answer is simple: the government :-D

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  31. I have a lot on 3.5" by ircmaxell · · Score: 1

    I have a lot of information on 3.5" disks. Tax returns dating back to the 80's. Archives of papers that I wrote in school. Old programs that I wrote since I was like 7 years old. Sure, I could convert them all to a few CDs, but do I really want to spend all that time? I also have quite a few 5.25" disks (and one computer with a working drive). I've got Windows 2 on low density 5.25" (like 5 or 6 of them). I'm too lazy to convert them to CD/DVD, yet consider them too important to just "throw away". Sure, I'm not buying new drives, but I still do use them occasionally...

    --
    If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    1. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, I could convert them all to a few CDs, but do I really want to spend all that time?

      Do you prefer losing them?

    2. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toss the lot. Really.

      You don't need your tax returns from thirty years ago. Your school papers aren't all that clever. It is cruft that you amass in years and it drags you down.

      Get some fress air in, get a few bin bags and throw it all out. You'll never miss it, and you know you could use the space it takes up.

    3. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by opus_magnum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd convert them while hardware was still working if I were you.

    4. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a lot of information on 3.5" disks

      No, you don't. You indeed have 3.5" disks dating back the 80's but.. have you tested them? Most probably the data are all gone by now.

    5. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, when was the last time you tried to read any of those old floppies? Any of mine with data I care about were transferred to harddisk (and my regular backups) long ago. It really does not take long except for the ones with read errors (couple of minutes a floppy). I can remember, years ago, many occasions when data could not be read from old floppies. I also have a customer who ended up with real problems recently. They have an old accounting program that will not run some operations without a readable copy protected floppy. Yes, the floppy became unreadable.

    6. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a lot of information on 3.5" disks. Tax returns dating back to the 80's. Archives of papers that I wrote in school. Old programs that I wrote since I was like 7 years old. Sure, I could convert them all to a few CDs, but do I really want to spend all that time? I also have quite a few 5.25" disks (and one computer with a working drive). I've got Windows 2 on low density 5.25" (like 5 or 6 of them).

      And you actually think those all still work after lying around unused for so long?

      Or you even believe that even if you burned them to CD now, they'd still be good in 20 years time?

      Sorry, but: LOL!

    7. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tax returns dating back to the 80's.. WHY???

      It's a personal liability to have any records that are older than 7 years. Burn those things in a fire or at least run them through a strong shredder.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by vlm · · Score: 1

      Sure, I could convert them all to a few CDs, but do I really want to spend all that time?

      On windows its probably days worth of clicky-clicky-clicky GUI goodness and fighting autorun.exe files and whatnot.

      On linux its just click to an xterm, "dd if=/dev/fd0 of=disk.fulla.stuff.image" and repeat when you hear the drive stop. The clock time adds up, but you can easily multitask so the real actual "work time" is about 10 seconds per disk. I did this about a decade ago. Back then, you could fit about 450 1.44M floppies on a 650 meg CD-R. Somewhat more 5.25 floppies of course.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    9. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by bloosh · · Score: 1

      I have lots of old Apple II floppies (both 143K 5.25" and 800K 3.5") from the early - mid 80s. The vast majority of them still work even though I've done nothing to properly store them.

      I think the reason older floppies like mine still work while nearly new ones have tons of defects is due to both the media being better manufactured and the much lower storage density.

    10. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You should convert them. Floppies fail a LOT. I wouldn't be surprised if 10%-20% of your disks have some corruption on them. At very least whenever you use one convert it over to a more modern format since you are taking the time to access it anyway.

      --
      Qxe4
    11. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      The normal rule for US individual tax returns is now to keep them for just 3 years. Those 2006 1040s just became unneeded records.

      However, there are some caveats to this:
      1. The reason for saying three years is enough, is at that point, the burden of proof has shifted. After three years, federal law says it stops being that you need to prove anything to the IRS, rather the IRS must actively disprove anything it disputes. Ergo, your unsupported word is now theoretically as good as having actual records. Technically, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THE IRS CAN"T AUDIT BACK FARTHER! It's gotten much more challenging for them, but not necessarily impossible. They don't seem to audit back past three in practice, but it's at least remotely possible they could make exceptions. And, they can still audit suspected fraud cases for up to 10 years.
      2. There's a general rule in accounting circles. If you start a business, save the tax return for the first year of that business until you close that business down. This goes for sole proprietorships and small partnerships as much as C or S corps. I take this to include keeping the first individual return that has a Schedule C attached so long as you are continuing to declare self employed income from the same sources year after year. That's probably overcautious in most small business cases, but if your business model is novel, something that the IRS might later have special concerns over, you might want to keep records for a long time indeed.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    12. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just the hardware, but the floppies themselves. Every once in a while I need a floppy and go digging in my stash of old ones from the 90's. Probably 75% of the disks won't format or if they do they have a lot of errors.

      The media just seems to degrade over time. But maybe it depends on the media. I have stacks of 80's era 5.25" floppies that all still work perfectly in my C64.

    13. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Have you checked recently to see if those floppies are even still readable?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, or rather put a copy of each file on your computer hard drive.

      Then (either automatically or by hand) put a second copy on your backup storage where you keep all your current important stuff.

    15. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Point 1. They can still go back 7 years, but they will only go back more than 3 years if there was no return filed. If you file returns, then you don't need more than 3 years. And, like you said, fraud is under different rules than a "regular" audit.
      Point 2. Your taxes your last year may depend on depreciation started the first year. To make sure you didn't deduct depreciation wrong, you need to have everything for depreciation of anything on your last 7 years of taxes. Say you have something that takes a long 20 years to fully depreciate, you would have to keep 27 years of records to prove that your depreciation 7 years ago was correct. You don't have to, but they may be no specific reason to destroy the old info and it can't hurt to have something to show in case of a problem.

    16. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if IRS claims that you never filed a return for a particular year, it can assess tax for that year at any time (even beyond three or six years), unless you can prove that you did file. Proving that you filed would, of course, be impossible after you have discarded your returns." - http://www.bassman.com/01_02.html

    17. Re:I have a lot on 3.5" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did just that about 8 years ago. I went into the attic collected all my floppies gathering dust there. The computer I had back then was from 1999, and still had a floppy drive, though rarely used. I got another floppy drive from an old computer that I hadn't got around to throw away, and installed that, so I got two floppy drives. Then I set out to copy all the floppies to the HD, about 300 or so.

      Each floppy was copied into it's own directory. The advantage with two drives was that I could swap the disk in one drive create a direcotry for it, while reading from another. It sped up the agonizinlgy slow process enough to make it bearable, and avoided me sitting around and waiting for the floppydisk to finish reading. Finally I burned the whole collection onto to a single CD-R.

      I think that was the last time I used floppies for anything.

  32. I use them every day! by karcirate · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have AOL and Windows 3.1 disks all over my desk, always ready for use as a coaster under my coffee.

    Can't remember the last time I bought one, though. But if anyone needs a coaster, I am happy to sell you some.

    1. Re:I use them every day! by mim · · Score: 1

      They're a useful retro art-deco thing for upscale Scanda coffee tables. Pretty soon they'll be in high demand and pricey.

  33. I still have to use them on rare occasion... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The most recent example was for trying to install SCSI/RAID controller drivers on my Win XP machine. The *only* ways to install them, that I've been able to find, are by floppy disk (also required me to buy an external floppy drive) or by making a re-configured Windows install disk and re-installing my OS.

    Since the former was easier, that's what I did.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by domatic · · Score: 4, Informative

      DriverPacks are your friend: http://driverpacks.net/

      They have a very nice tool that slipstreams (among others) mass storage and network drivers into Windows installation media. I've used it for XP and 2003 and have found that DriverPacked install media will pretty much find your storage controller even on recent machines.

    2. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creating a slipstream disk with the proper drivers in it takes ~10 minutes or less, and you only need to do it once. Then you don't have to use insanely outdated hardware.

      Your solution is only valid if you are a sucker for punishment.

    3. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      The best way to do that would to slipstream your drivers into your install disk.

      I've used nlite to slip in my nvidia raid drivers. You can use it for more than just raid so that you have a damn near up to date computer straight out of install.

      http://www.nliteos.com/

      You can also use it on older windows OS's, I used it on my win2k disk so that if I install it again I don't need to use floppies to start it off.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    4. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The most recent example was for trying to install SCSI/RAID controller drivers on my Win XP machine. The *only* ways to install them, that I've been able to find, are by floppy disk (also required me to buy an external floppy drive) or by making a re-configured Windows install disk and re-installing my OS. Since the former was easier, that's what I did.

      Does that include the time wasted writing corrupt floppies?

    5. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by jittles · · Score: 1

      It's only easier the first time around. If you have to install XP again and wait for it to load 3rd party drivers off a floppy it can get tedious. Then, while you're at it, you can make a completely automated install with the latest security updates.

    6. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a problem on your end. I've never had a problem like that.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    7. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      You must be the only person on the planet that has ever used floppies, and have never suffered data corruption.

    8. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      I seem to get corrupt burned CDs all the time... so it seems like both options suffer from that problem.

      Just, I've never had it happen with floppies.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    9. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by soppsa · · Score: 1

      Seriously, buy a machine built in the last 5 years and it will definitely support USB keys emulated as floppy disks in the bios.

    10. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      I built it 4 years ago.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    11. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      nLite is pretty easy... unpack SATA drivers from installer, then integrate with nLite. (textmode)

      Took me almost 20 minutes to figure out, the first time. That's less than hunting down and hooking up a floppy drive.

    12. Re:I still have to use them on rare occasion... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI for anyone out there stuck supporting Windows systems...

      Including the disk driver packs seems to have disabled Microsoft's (unsupported, but invaluable) fix for booting with a different IDE controller than was present during the system install: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314082

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  34. XP install needs then by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

    Windows XP still needs a floppy if you need to install specific drivers on install process, like SATA drivers.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    1. Re:XP install needs then by Combatso · · Score: 0

      or you set your USB stick to emulate a floppy.. we somehow manage to install various MS OS's on our computers and servers with no floppy drives

    2. Re:XP install needs then by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That may not be possible with some bios.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:XP install needs then by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      How you do that?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  35. Hah by Derosian · · Score: 1

    Just yesterday I had to explain to a female co-worker of mine about flash drives and how they were better than floppies... She was amazed, also at how cheap they were.

    1. Re:Hah by mim · · Score: 1

      Huh? And a MALE co-worker wouldn't be amazed??

    2. Re:Hah by socsoc · · Score: 1

      What does her sex have to do with it? Ignorance comes in all flavors.

    3. Re:Hah by pureevilmatt · · Score: 2, Informative

      the implication being that he not only talked to a female, but managed to amaze her. i for one congratulate the GP on his successes with the female race.

    4. Re:Hah by stevenvi · · Score: 1

      I think he was bragging that not only did he talk to a female, he impressed her.

    5. Re:Hah by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Flash drives are getting cheaper, but floppies are still cheaper for the 2MB size file. I worked in a lab one summer that I needed to copy files onto a classified machine. It was only about 1 MB of files (a program I was creating), so I'd just copy it onto a floppy, move it to the secured machine, then file the disk in the safe to be destroyed (once it's touched the classified machine, it can't be used on a non-classified machine).

    6. Re:Hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just yesterday I had to explain to a female co-worker of mine about flash drives and how they were better than floppies... She was amazed, also at how cheap they were.

      OK, since you explicitly mention "female"...there must be a reason... a SEXUAL reason
      reading between the lines, I would say that you flashed your floppy bits at a female coworker and she laughed when you tried to charge her $1 for the experience.

  36. Ugh.. by krnpimpsta · · Score: 2, Funny
    stopped reading after (emphasis mine):

    The truth is the 3½-inch, 1.44 megabyte floppy - the disk that made it big - has always defied logic. It's not floppy for a start. The term was a hangover from its precursor, the 5¼-inch floppy, which had a definite lack of rigidness about it. However, its smaller successor held 15 times as much data.

    1) so, what is the proper term for this then? "hard disk"? ARGHHH
    2) 15 times as much data in a 3.5"? ARGHHHHH
    ok, fine, i didn't stop reading. i only continued reading, but irritatedly.

    --

    New webcomic updated on Sundays: HERE

    1. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) "crispy"

    2. Re:Ugh.. by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      Ya obviously TFA-author has never taken apart a 3.5".. they are still floppies to me because of the internal media isn't rigid, at least last I checked.

      As for use, I've used them in the last couple years to:
      - Install drivers on a Win box during install.. (WHY does VMware need a WINDOWS vCenter box?! Why can't it just be a thin-OS like ESX is?! it makes no sense!)
      - Update BIOS firmware drivers on some older servers (at the time it was easier then doing it via CD, although it did take me a short wihle to find a 3.5" disk that wasn't corrupt!)

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    3. Re:Ugh.. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      1) I heard "stiffy disk" used. But never with a straight face. "Floppy" was, indeed, the non-literal most commonly used name.
      2) I dunno where they got that "15" from. What does that make the putative 5.25" diskette's capacity, about 96kB? Only some really pre-historic 8-bit machines (Atari comes to mind) in a single-sided single-density mode got so little storage on a diskette.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:Ugh.. by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Indeed... even just saying "1.44 megabyte" for those things REALLY bugs me. They're 2 megabyte, and "somewhat less" after formatting, depending on the format used. Being an Amiga user way back then, a high density disk was always "1.7MB plus change" in my mind.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    5. Re:Ugh.. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The Commodore 1541 got 144k on a floppy. so 96kb does sound that off. Maybe that was what you got on the CP/M standard SS/SD 8" floppy.

      Of course we had a joke.
      I started to use computers men where real men, we had 8" floppies and 12" Hard disks. You wimps have to get by with 3.5" semi ridged disks!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Ugh.. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      2.88 MB 3.5 inch floppy divided by 15 == ~190 kilobytes. About the same size as my C=64's five-and-a-quarter disks.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Ugh.. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The worst part: It still IS floppy. If you take the clamshell off of a 3.5" disk, you'll discover a floppy mylar substrate with the magnetic coating. That's the floppy of a floppy disk. Hard Disks use aluminum platters instead.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:Ugh.. by Neil · · Score: 1

      The original BBC Microcomputer stored 100kbytes on 40-track single-sided single-density 5.25" floppies, which is a reasonable match to the factor of 15 estimate if they are comparing with a 1440kbyte double-sided high-density 3.5" disk.

    9. Re:Ugh.. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I didn't read any of it, but it has always irked me that people have issues calling the 3-1/2" diskettes "floppy." The container may be rigid plastic, unlike with the older diskettes such as 5-1/4", but the actual disk inside the container, on which the actual bits are written, is floppy. A hard disk, by contrast, contains rigid magnetic platters for storing your data. So I'm with you on point #1.

      For point #2 ... 1440 / 15 = 96. I always remember the base capacity of 5-1/4" diskettes as being 360KB (with 720KB and 1.2MB also produced), so I checked Wikipedia and sure enough that's right. There doesn't appear to be a 96KB 5-1/4" format out there, as best I can tell. Those that come close to that size are basically weird formats.

    10. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the article's from the BBC. They're probably using metric.

    11. Re:Ugh.. by mikestew · · Score: 1

      Thing is, it is a floppy. It's just encased in a rigid shell. This being /., I wasn't going to RTFA anyway, but this quote certainly gives me no incentive to do so.

    12. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is still a floppy because the media inside is flexible just like the original "floppy"

    13. Re:Ugh.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The disk is a floppy. The case it is in is not.

      It's still a stupid argument.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Ugh.. by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      Moreover, the disk is indeed "floppy" once you remove it from its plastic casing.

    15. Re:Ugh.. by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      2.88 MB? That's like.... mythical. That's a Bigfoot riding on the back of a unicorn.

      But assuming they were using the...mythical... 2.88MB format, then, yes, 1/15th is approximately the capacity of any number of single-sided single-density 5.25" formats.

      But 2.88MB? That wasn't even the same media as the classical 3.5" DSHD diskette. Special drive, special medium, special BIOS or driver support. Hell, by that standard, the 21 MB Floptical falls into the same category.

      If TFA was seriously thinking about the 2.88MB diskette, they need to start passing around whatever they were smoking.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    16. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stopped reading after (emphasis mine):

      The truth is the 3½-inch, 1.44 megabyte floppy - the disk that made it big - has always defied logic. It's not floppy for a start. The term was a hangover from its precursor, the 5¼-inch floppy, which had a definite lack of rigidness about it. However, its smaller successor held 15 times as much data.

      1) so, what is the proper term for this then? "hard disk"? ARGHHH
      Floppy disk.

      2) 15 times as much data in a 3.5"? ARGHHHHH
      I am at a loss for how they got that data.

      ok, fine, i didn't stop reading. i only continued reading, but irritatedly.

      The magnetic disk itself is floppy. The plastic cover of the 3.5 or the thick paper envelope of the 5.25 were just covers to keep the magnetic disk from getting damaged.

    17. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. If my memory serves me correctly a 5 1/4 disk could hold 1.2 Mb formatted double sided double density. I think that they were referring to single sided single density 5 1/2 disks.

      Those disks were always the same as the double sided double density disk as you could use a hole punch to make them double sided.

      Nathan

    18. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prior to the PC, a 5.25 disk held around 80-100KB, depending on which microcomputer you were talking about. I think a single-density 35-track TRS-80 Model I disk was about 86KB (if I'm remembering right). I think a 40-track was...96KB!

    19. Re:Ugh.. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected and educated. But I will stand by the point that the particular 5-1/4" diskettes that were a "precursor" to the 3-1/2" diskette (which were, as far as I can recall, originally 720KB and not 1440KB at the time that they could be called a successor to 5-1/4") held substantially more than 96KB, specifically either 360KB or 720KB.

      Side note: If today's mentality had ruled the 80's, there would have been a different type of diskette drive for every one of those formats as floppies got larger. No way would a 1.44MB drive have been able to read a 720KB diskette. And if it could, it certainly wouldn't be able to write to it.

    20. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) so, what is the proper term for this then? "hard disk"? ARGHHH

      I call them crunchy disks.

    21. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it was a "mentality." It was just the dawn of the home computer age. Things started big and clunky because that's what was available. We still have that issue today, going to ZIP, magneto-optical, CD, DVD-RAM, USB, SD, etc. Besides the 5.25 disk went through a lot of size increases before the 3.5 came around, and then you needed a better design with better material. The last 3.5 size for PC was 2.88. When, if ever, did you use one of those instead of a CD-R/W?

    22. Re:Ugh.. by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      1) Since the 3.5" were smaller than the 5.25" disks, I always call them "Compact Disks"

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    23. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the disk itself is still floppy, so floppy disk is a perfectly cromulent term.

      Seriously though, it is a floppy disk, just in a hard plastic container.

    24. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obscure trivia:

      the 5.25 inch floppy diskette had at least 6 incarnations:

      110k Shugart SA 400
      113k Apple Disk II (pre OS3.30)
      130k Apple Disk II (Post (S3.30)
      180k single sided, single density.
      360k double sided, double density.
      1.2m double sided, high density.

      Granted, none of them are "15 times as large" as the 3.5 inch high density diskette, unless you count the "Rarely seen" 2.88M diskette drive. (I have ACTUALLY seen this rare animal, tucked away inside an authentic IBM PS/2 system, attached to a proprietary floppy diskette interface controller.)

      For the first part though, 3.5 inch diskettes are INDEED "Floppies", they just have an integrated caddy that protects the ferromagnetic plastic medium that is more rigid than that found around the medium of the 5.25 media. The term "Floppy" vs "Hard" comes from the condition of this "Platter." Personally though, I prefer the old DOS FDISK nomenclature of "Fixed disk", since 1) I am an old codger who likes to chase kids off his lawn, 2)there is no ambiguity about what you are talking about 3)in most ideal conditions other than in extreme enthusiast setups and RAID controllers, they are not made to be easily pulled from the system.

    25. Re:Ugh.. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      What I meant is that there was not the same type of competition as you see now. Even now, after things have stabilized, there are DVD+R and DVD-R, and probably a few others that I have to sort through when I (rarely) buy blank DVDs. It seemed, although I was young at the time, that floppy disks were much quicker to standardize on one format. There were not 30 standards for 1.4-meg-class 3-1/2" drives, just the "IBM"/"PC" 1.44MB and the Apple 1.4MB. I don't recall there being a ton of competition in the 2.88MB size, either.

    26. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I giggle every time I try to say Floptical out loud?

    27. Re:Ugh.. by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

      1) so, what is the proper term for this then? "hard disk"? ARGHHH

      Obligitory link:

      http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail143.html

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
    28. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper term is "diskette."

  37. older hardware / software by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Lots of older motherboards can only boot of floppies, not of USB sticks. They need floppies with FreeDOS to boot for the occasional BIOS update, firmware flash and other similar maintenance. Memtest86+ is another popular stuff to boot on a floppy. And some antique mother boards can't even reliabily boot CD-ROMs requiring a floppy boot-loader.

    Installer of older versions of Windows XP can't use drivers on anything but floppies. Vista's installer is the first able to use other media.

    As long as such older machines are around (and they will be even longer around in 3rd world) there will be a small discrete demand for floppies

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  38. Disk-based Tape Delay by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Maybe we should talk to this guy.

  39. Machine tools? by vlm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Brand new computer controlled machine tools being sold today, using floppy drives:

    http://www.americanmachinetools.com/cnc_milling.htm

    Just ask google... "Results 1 - 10 of about 13,200 for Floppy CNC mill. (0.29 seconds)"

    G-Code is kind of a CLI for machine tools. Remember Logo in the 80s? Well, theres only so many ways to design a language to do Cartesian stuff. Being vaguely text like, you can figure ten bytes per line. Figure maybe twice as many non-cutting operations as cutting operations. Gaze upon a machined part, perhaps a hard drive case, whatever, and contemplate most jobs will have a couple hundred cutting operations. So, you're going to need hundreds of cuts times about 3 to account for non-cutting lines (config, comments, etc), times about ten bytes per line of G-code, figure 15K file per part. An easy fit on a floppy drive.

    Now something really complicated, like a turbine or fancy rims for a ghetto car, that might fill a floppy disk.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  40. It is a floppy by nuggz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right from the article.

    The truth is the 3½-inch, 1.44 megabyte floppy - the disk that made it big - has always defied logic. It's not floppy for a start.

    Really come, it's been around long enough everyone should have peeked behind that little window and seen the disk actually is a floppy little piece of plastic.

    1. Re:It is a floppy by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Well, if you painstakingly crack the casing, remove the media, and strip out the hub to prove your point... well, if can be floppy, or it can be usable, but it can't be both at the same time.

      Whereas the 8" and 5.25" media was pretty dang floppy even in its intact, fully usable form. The contrast justifies the otherwise trivial observation.

      Or are you too young to know the pain of the ONLY COPY of priceless data destroyed by accidentally creasing the 5.25" it was stored on? The rigid case of a 3.5" diskette was a HUGE improvement.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:It is a floppy by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that alone shows that the article was written by an idiot.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:It is a floppy by nuggz · · Score: 1

      I do recall the pain of losing data on a 5 1/4.
      Having used Commodore computers first, I was shocked that PC's would have you power on with a disk in the drive.

      As far as 3 1/2 cases being rigid, I agree.
      However it's the DISK we're talking about, not the case.
      I think 5 1/4 disks were actually more rigid than the 3 1/2 disks (I am talking about the actual disk, not the protective case.

  41. Re:Sony by Wovel · · Score: 1

    Been a while since we heard anything about Natalie Portman, thanks.

  42. Stitch files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Multi-head embroidery machines use them. The last shop I worked for had around 20,000 containing design files for clients, saved over the years.

    1. Re:Stitch files by ewilts · · Score: 1

      Even single-head sewing/embroidery machines for home use have floppy drives. We've got one and it would cost us easily several grand to replace it with a newer model that uses USB sticks instead.

      --
      .../Ed
    2. Re:Stitch files by myndzi · · Score: 1

      I came here to post this. What's more, they use double density disks. Even the newer machines. What's a floppy drive cost for these things? Hundreds of dollars, of course. It's pretty silly.

      And the quality of floppy disks has been going down. We get a lot more disks now that fail quickly. My last shop wiped/wrote disks for every job, which is more likely to wear them out quickly of course, but this place keeps a mirror of all the files on our server on disks out in the shop. Still, we run into files with bad sectors in them more often in the new disks than the old ones.

      There are solutions that let you use USB sticks now, but again... very expensive.

    3. Re:Stitch files by drfreak · · Score: 1

      My mother bought a new sewing machine a few years back where the pattern-creation interface and storage was actually on a Game Boy. No kidding, the sewing machine even came with the game boy. For the materials available at the time, I thought it was brilliant.

  43. Re:Sony by Wovel · · Score: 1

    If you read through the comments the article will be pasted all through it because of all the questions from people who did not RTFA. So as long as you are not first, it is cool :)

  44. Disklavier pianos and light boards by mkenig · · Score: 1

    Most Yamaha Disklavier pianos and theater light boards use floppy. I've used usb-to-midi on my electronic piano for a long time, but many owners still use floppy to record and playback. Lots of traffic about floppies on Disklavier boards recently. Also computerized light boards record cues to floppy. Theaters can't afford to replace them so often.

  45. Entertainment industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sadly there are still many lighting companies (including mine) that use lighting consoles that still rely on floppies for saving shows and fixture information. Why would they want to buy a new 15,000 dollar console when we can just go to the flea market and get a crate of un-reliable old floppies for 5 bucks!

    1. Re:Entertainment industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I'm sure Barco is wondering the same thing after buying out HighEnd.

      Posting AC for obvious reasons.

  46. 3.5" Floppy by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    I've not had to use one nor needed one since 1998.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:3.5" Floppy by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      I had to use one in 2003 or so for a school project, and some time after that for XP to get some drivers. Those are the only times in recent memory that I have had to use one.

      --
      SSC
    2. Re:3.5" Floppy by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      They are still used in a number of specialized machines, even some are still being produced. Sometimes, there is just no push to update something -- floppies work, the task the machines perform is not limited by the use of floppy disks, and there is no need for larger storage. I still see systems running DOS here and there -- systems that simply would not benefit from something else, typically systems that only need to run a single program at a time.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  47. Boot disks by zero_out · · Score: 1

    Sometimes you need a good boot disk that will load DOS, and run Ghost on it. In my experience, making bootdisks on floppies is a lot easier than trying to use CDs or USB flash sticks. Every boot disk image I find is made for floppies, and while I can modify the image and burn it to a CD, every boot disk utility I've seen still requires me to write the image to an actual floppy disk, then burn the CD off that. www.bootdisk.com has some great utilities, but this is the exact process that all of the images from that site require. Believe me, if I could skip the whole floppy disk step, I would. If there is another way to do it, it probably requires some expensive software to write the floppy image directly to the CD. The other option, creating a boot disk from absolute scratch, is not within my skill set. My kung-fu isn't THAT good. This means that for the forseeable future, I'm going to need floppy disks.

    1. Re:Boot disks by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you have the floppy as a disk image, or can run dd, you're not that far off from creating a bootable floppy-compatible CD. It's called El-Torito, and it's available in Windows with IMGBurrn or on Linux with K3B.

    2. Re:Boot disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's easy. I run Ghost from a USB drive that has a floppy disk boot sector image on it.

  48. Its a fashion statement. by coniferous · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Clearly these purses are being bought by the bucket load. http://www.fractalspin.com/x/product.php?cat=13&page=1&productid=156

  49. Another reason by Rakeris · · Score: 1

    I didn't read all the comments to see if someone mentioned it...

    But in a the metal manufacturing shop that my father runs all of there presses, breaks and other equipment with some computer controls, like for pre-sets and settings use floppy drives. Equipment that costs several hundreds of thousands of dollars per piece. It's not like they have a lot of pressure to upgrade. =\

    --
    If brute force isn't working, you are not using enough.
  50. OK, I admit it. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's me. I've been buying those millions of floppy disks. No. I don't know why. I just like them. You got a problem with that?

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:OK, I admit it. by JiffyPop · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am just imagining a stack of 34,000 floppies... used to back up 1 blu-ray disc.

      At an eighth-inch a piece (rough estimate) that would be a stack more than 350ft tall!

    2. Re:OK, I admit it. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I bought 50 a few days ago. So blame me too, just not as much as the guy above who bought millions.

  51. Who is buying them? by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Who is buying them?

    Skeet-shooting geeks.

    1. Re:Who is buying them? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Actually, they don't dust as nicely as a real skeet target, or even a old CD-R. They do make nice 100 yard targets for work with the 22 though...

      How do you know a geek is shooting skeet and doing well? He brags in the club house about "getting 10 on low #8!"

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  52. Re:Sony by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

    You forgot the beowulf clusters of Cowboy Neil, you insensitive clod! Of course, I have to ask myself, "Does it run Linux?" And is it powerful enough to play Crysis?

    --
    SSC
  53. GMDSS terminals on ships still use them by ornel · · Score: 1

    Big vessels have to carry GMDSS, which are multi-channel safety and distress systems to be used in case of fire, man overboard or piracy. They have to be able to run for hours on battery power in case of power failure and to be super reliable. An important part of the system is the Sat C terminal, such as the Sailor DT4646E, which are pretty nicely built and sturdy flat screen PCs with 640k RAM, running DOS and a terminal program for Sat C communications from flash memory. They use 3.5" disk drives -- with a proprietary connector and selling for $150. And this is precisely the less reliable part of the terminal, since the floppy is always inside the drive (for saving messages) and the heads are exposed to the salty air and have to be cleaned (and replaced) often. But the things are still running (always on) after may many years.

  54. Clearly... by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

    Bob.

    --
    Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
  55. Legacy products by swaq · · Score: 1

    My company still buys loads of 3.5" floppies to send monthly data updates to our legacy customers. Since we charge them $X,XXX per year for the subscription we don't want to drop support. It would cost most our customers $XXX,XXX to upgrade to our newer product which supports USB drives and SD cards, so it will be a while before we stop buying 3.5" floppy disks. Our bigger problem is our slightly newer legacy products which use ZIP disks, since the drives and disks for those are getting harder to find in bulk.

    1. Re:Legacy products by afidel · · Score: 1

      Why not lower the cost to upgrade to the first version that supported a modern distribution method? Might bring in more upgrade revenue and lower your and your customers operating costs.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Legacy products by swaq · · Score: 1

      We are offering a trade-in program for at least one series of models, but I'd guess it's still around the six-figure range when you include installation and such. There are plenty of feature advantages (e.g. bigger database) of the new models to provide incentive to upgrade as well. A good portion of our sales are upgrades already, either from our old systems or from a competitor's product.

      As long as it works, there will always be someone who will still use it instead of upgrading.

  56. Master plan by fortapocalypse · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Setup multiple dummy corporations to buy up all of the world's floppy disks. Step 2: ??? Step 3: Profit!

  57. Re:Who'd be wasting money on outdated technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point! xD

  58. forget 1.44 floppy disks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHERE ARE THE DISKS FOR MY SUPERDISC DRIVE?! 120 mb bitches! I bought that shit, and 3 months later I couldn't find disks for it. The CDR became affordable right about then.

  59. Airplanes by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most airplanes (A320, 737,...) still use a floppy drive to update the Flight Management System database (waypoints, routes,...). These updates are done twice a month. The data fits on about ten floppies, I think, it's just text and numbers. Some newer types use CD-Rom drives, but technology moves slowly in the airline world. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, especially if it costs lots of money for certification just because it happens to be for an airplane.

    1. Re:Airplanes by Trogre · · Score: 1

      My experience is that although floppy disks are much less reliable than CDs, the opposite is true for the DRIVES. Dirty floppy drive heads can often be cleaned with a cleaning disk with good success. Lens cleaners *might* occasionally work on CD drives, in the rare instance the problem is actually a dirty lens. Drive motors seem to have rather tight tolerances these days, and once a laser diode has gone out of its calibration range it's bye bye drive.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Airplanes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DB2 still keeps the planes in the air from colliding!

  60. Users of IE6 by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing the correlation between using floppies and using IE6 is very high.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  61. i still need boot diskettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i still keep an old boot diskette from the early windows xp days as backup. It often saved my ass while repairing older computers for older clients. I can argue that an new computer would be better than that 8 years old Pentium, but they don't care. For them it's often a kind of typewriter/calculator and nothing more. And they don't want to spent to much money for a replacement as long as that machine stays working. Repairing those is actually a very good side job to earn some extras so i won't try to convince them...

    Netbooks are no valid replacement, because the screen and the keyboard is to little, others are to expensive.

  62. Like Chia Pets by slaad · · Score: 1

    They must be like Chia pets.

    I've never known anyone to actually buy one, yet year after year they keep selling them so SOMEONE must be buying them.

    --


    ~Warning!~ The above is encrypted using rot676!
  63. Coasters by Shompol · · Score: 1

    It's hard to come by better retro high-tech coasters these days

  64. Banks by smooc · · Score: 1

    I know for a fact that a lot of banks have their account transfers for Businesses on 3.5" floppy disks. They can't even repair the machines anymore that write the disks

    --
    - In Memoriam: Jeroen de Bruin (1972-2004), bye bro
  65. It's me by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    The teachers where I work simply refuse to use the cameras I've just bought them. Instead, they're sticking with these

    What they don't know is that the new workstations don't have floppy drives... >:-)

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  66. My dad by he-sk · · Score: 1

    He wanted an external floppy drive for his new computer for christmas. I tried talking him out of it to no avail.

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  67. Angelina Jolie by clintonmonk · · Score: 2, Funny

    well duh, it's the hackers that are buying them.

  68. Geeky Christmas decorations? by Zocalo · · Score: 1

    I know I've "decommissioned" a few floppy disks in my time by turning them into Christmas decorations. One particularly slow December at an employer we did the entire tree and most of the streamers strung across our office ceiling. I doubt that there are still enough people doing this to reach the kind of numbers cited in the article though.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  69. Have you priced coasters lately? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  70. Re:Who'd be wasting money on outdated technologies by ig88b · · Score: 1

    I work for "the government" and we don't use floppies. In fact, I haven't seen a single one since I've worked here.

  71. IT Appliances by bigdogpete · · Score: 1

    We still have to buy them as we have to do some of our backups to floppy for some of our gateway products/appliances and with each backup needing 3 or 4 of them, well you get the picture. What we need is a floppy to usb drive converter, that way I can throw them all away. Also Dell still has drivers that need to load from floppies on older servers. One of these days we can all live a floppy-loss kind of life. But not in the immediate future.

  72. Theatre lighting desks by NoNeeeed · · Score: 1

    To add to all the specialist gear that people are mentioning we can add theatre lighting desks.

    The smart lighting desks are basically just DOS based PCs with a funky set of peripherals.

    If I need to save a lighting plot or configuration I use a 3.5" disc.

    I'm sure they will have USB disc support eventually, but lighting plots don't take much space so there is no real pressure. It'll probably happen when people can't get new disks.

  73. Re:I know better! by Sharp+Rulez · · Score: 0

    6.4 MB per day
    2.3GB per year
    --
    4.6GB per DVD
    1 DVD per 2 years
    --
    1$ per DVD
    0.50$ per year.

    Seems even more economical.

  74. BAD SUMMARY by CranberryKing · · Score: 1
    Claims to be about the "Mega-selling Floppy Disk", but the original article is about the floppy Diskette (3.5"). Currently there are no Mega-selling floppy Disks (5.25").

    I am shocked at /. for posting such an enormous error.

  75. manufacturing plant by confused+one · · Score: 1

    We still have a number of test systems in our plant which are still running DOS software. These machines are typically legacy hardware. In some cases the software cannot run on Windows because of various incompatibilities; so, migrating to newer hardware requires a software re-write (which we are working on, slowly). Because of this dependancy on legacy software and legacy hardware we still have to use 3.5" floppies on occasion.

    Hell, I still have a box of 2S/DD (360kB) 5 1/4" floppies in my desk -- we only retired that machine late last year.

  76. Floppies are like tribbles by shadowrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    They seem to multiply at exponential rates. I'm constantly throwing the damn things away yet more and more keep showing up in my desk drawers. Worse, some people seem to get incredibly attached to them. Maybe it's the pleasant purring they emit when nestled snuggly in a floppy drive.

    Some people at work seem to adopt them. I say there can't possibly be any data of significant value in 1.4mb, but these floppy analogs to cat ladies just can't bear to get rid of the disks.

    I can't wait till a Klingon warbird shows up and we can simply beam the lot of them to their storage holds.

  77. Re:Sony by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Natalie Portman is starting to get a little "droopy" if you catch my drift; she's starting to resemble Carie Fisher. (Like me...getting old sucks.) We need a new babe to drool over.

    I nominate the cutie from Caprica. No not the Cylon girl - her blonde friend.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  78. legacy by bibdectrl · · Score: 1

    i am currently supposed to be backing up my work data to disks, for some reason. i have a drawer full of unlabeled disks that i hope i will never have to go through.

  79. Accountancy software. by shippo · · Score: 1

    One of the commercial accountancy software packages found in the UK prompts its user to make regular backups of the data to floppies for archiving purposes.

  80. CNCs, PLC. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Gosh darn legacy equipment (CNC seems big one). I'd like to see a device for legacy systems which would connect to a standard floppy controller, and also have a USB port, and mount an image file off the usb drive. Then the usb drive could be connected to newer hardware and the image file could be mounted in software instead of the USB floppy foolishness.

    I've also seen floppies used to move around licences for Alan-Bradley software (for PLC systems), complete with a complement of unreliable USB floppy drives. The licences can be moved on floppies, can't be moved on "removable media" (how most usb flash appears), but can be moved on usb hard drives (appear as fixed). You can mount a Truecrypt image located on usb flash, as a "fixed disk" and copy licences on/off. As well it provides an easy method of backing up licences. They are moving to an online activation licencing scheme now.

    Some scopes and other equipment use them. I'd rather use RS232 when available instead of floppy.

    Good riddance to floppies. My life would be complete if I never have to use one ever again.

  81. The same people who buy Polaroid film. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Who buys 3-1/2" floppies? The same people who buy Polaroid film. OK, not exactly the same people, but in real life, people and companies don't throw out stuff that is working perfectly well, and they keep buying the consumables for a long time after the product is supposedly "obsolete."

    There's a consistent, strong tendency to overemphasis the new stuff, because it's how companies make their money, it's what makes for interesting articles in the trade press, and personal career advancement is better served by expertise in Windows 7 than in MS-DOS. But don't think for a minute that MS-DOS is not being used anywhere in your company.

    People will say "that's five years old, do we really need to support it?" You point down the hall to the room where some PC-AT is still in use, and the reaction is, "Oh, sure, isn't it awful, I can't believe we have those museum pieces lying around, but that's just because our company is no good. NOBODY ELSE has them." Wrong, everybody does. If there's some manager who thinks they don't, it just means they don't know where it is.

    There is still a market for new typewriter ribbons, compact cassette tapes, and vacuum tubes. When a billion dollar market becomes a $10 million dollar market, it doesn't necessarily become unprofitable. Heck, my dad once bought an old cylinder photograph that wasn't working. There was still an outfit that was still making replacement needles and diaphragms and other parts for them.

  82. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my king dom for a mod point!

  83. School board only accepts marks on floppy by smist08 · · Score: 1

    The school board my wife teaches in, only accepts marks submitted on floppy disk. The software they use is ancient and they never change their procedures. Schools are having a hard time keeping computers with floppies running for teachers to use.

  84. Dorm room warfare by Dreaming+in+R'lyeh · · Score: 1

    Nothing better has ever been invented for flinging at your roommate.

  85. The reasons by oktokie · · Score: 0

    some hardware's firmware(BIOS) require floppy disk option for updating firmware = 5%
    Microsoft Windows XP and Servers always requiring the use of floppy for loading storage device driver during an installation setup = 95%

    Should Windows become obsolete in 3 years the need for floppy drive will completely die out.

  86. Re:Who'd be wasting money on outdated technologies by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and in response: our government lab banned the use of flash drives for networked PCs a couple years ago. now, if I want to move data from a lab PC (or piece of equipment like an oscilloscope) to a networked PC, I use floppy. Sure, PC to PC could be done by burning a CD. But then I start to collect a nice pile of coasters. Most data consists of text files that zip nicely, and disk spanning still works like it used to. 7zip even makes a nice command line executable for running off the scopes. CD burning is also tediously slow, and repeated multi-sessioning to reduce the coaster count makes CD loading even slower. CDRW is an option, too, but it feels like those write even slower than floppies.

    Basically, anything under 5MB that needs to move from off network device to networked device, I do by floppy disk. That covers 90% of my file transfers.

  87. After next year, NOBODY! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Ironic that this question should be asked again now, when only two days ago Sony announced they would stop manufacturing them next year.

    I re-installed Windows XP for someone recently, and it required a hard drive controller drive to be loaded before partitioning. That driver could *only* be installed from a floppy disk. Way to look ahead Microsoft!

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  88. general public still uses floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a career resource center i see people bring in floppies all the time. many non highly technical people still use the floppy despite how the techies feel about the nearing obsolescence of floppies. Some people still dont know what a flash drive is. there is a requirement on all our PC's that a system must have a flopppy drive due to the still very high popularity. I would say half or more people bring in their digital documents via floppy disk. Some people just dont keep pace with technology. there is a lack of education in the general public about the benefits of using a flash drive over a floppy or even what a flash drive is.

  89. Blame it on Microsoft Genuine Advantage! by mcpublic · · Score: 1

    Back when I worked on digital camera firmware in 2004, our Taiwanese manufacturing partner asked us to make sure our USB interface worked with Windows 95, claiming that a significant number of their mainland customers were still using this ancient OS. Maybe they're still buying floppies too.

  90. Re:Sony by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    But will it blend?

  91. City of Los Angeles Still Uses Floppies by glowimperial · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently had a shocking meeting in the office of some folks from the Recreation and Parks Department, and was disturbed to see that the computers they were using not only were running Windows 95, but which had only 3.5" drives. The presence of several disks laying out on the desk of one employee and a disk storage unit on the desk were definite indications of daily use. Oh, and the highly paid, union protected, pension equipped employee was an excellent multitasker. He was able to both play solitaire during the entire meeting and give his full attention to the important business of doing his job. If you were wondering why one of the world's biggest cities is approaching total failure, there's a few reasons for you.

    1. Re:City of Los Angeles Still Uses Floppies by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the highly paid, union protected, pension equipped employee was an excellent multitasker. He was able to both play solitaire during the entire meeting and give his full attention to the important business of doing his job. If you were wondering why one of the world's biggest cities is approaching total failure, there's a few reasons for you.

      Whatever it takes to repeat lame Republican talking points.

  92. I actually use them by bigredradio · · Score: 1

    Oddly, floppies are great for debug and making code changes during the boot process. There are times when you do not have access to the disk or console (yet) and still need to know what is happening. Redirecting standard error to a file on a floppy has saved my bacon more times that I can count. It is also good if I need to "inject" new code into a system that is barely booted up. (no network, no disk access) Burning a CD/DVD for a 12K shell script seems a waste to me. I know I am probably a special case though. I don't buy millions of them, but when I buy new test systems, they must have a floppy drive.

  93. Aircraft navigation equipment still uses floppies by Centurion5 · · Score: 1

    Aircraft navigation equipment still uses them. Pilots load data into their older GPS systems with them. The navigation equipment is still up to date but updating to CD or USB input would cost $10,000 to $15,000. So, pilots get dozens of floppies and spend an hour or more a month updating their navigation data.

  94. I use one floppy disk. by graffitirock · · Score: 1

    KolibriOS http://www.kolibrios.org/ fits on a 3.5" disk. That accounts for the floppy at my house.

  95. Windows XP by thechemic · · Score: 1

    Windows XP needs RAID drivers and I can only get them loaded via floppy. Honestly, I have never researched alternate methods for loading drivers at the Windows XP install. Is there a better way?

    --
    Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
  96. Wait, so you're saying.. by MXPS · · Score: 1

    I didn't have to install Windows 7 via 3544 floppy disks???

  97. Manifestos by oldbenway · · Score: 1

    What better way to get your manifesto home after slaving away all day at the library?

  98. Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by GiMP · · Score: 4, Informative

    While you're mourning the loss of the floppy, I'm waiting for the death of the CD/DVD. They're big, they scratch, they're not optimal for read/write. More and more of our devices are mobile and CD readers are both large and heavy.

    Digital distribution and flash media replace the necessity for the CD. Of the 3 CD/DVDs I've bought since 2005, two were Apple OS upgrades and one was a video game. The video game is now available on Steam. The OS upgrades could be easily transferred and sold on flash media, or sold online and transferred by the user either to DVD or flash media, as to their preference.

    Right now, the CD/DVD format is enjoying the same obsolesce, yet pervasiveness, the floppy enjoyed circa 1999. They'll be (practically) dead soon enough...

    1. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by Starcub · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right now, the CD/DVD format is enjoying the same obsolesce, yet pervasiveness, the floppy enjoyed circa 1999. They'll be (practically) dead soon enough...

      I don't think so. Many people still do backup's on disk; it's a far cheaper medium than flash, and I'm guessing that people feel it's more reliable than online access to content or stored data.

    2. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by rabiddeity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite often the write-once nature of optical disks is a positive. Burn an OS install disc once, finalize the disc, and run a verification on a separate computer. You can be reasonably certain the install is "clean", and it can't really be tampered with. But if you instead put that installer on flash media, what's to keep compromised software from later rewriting the bootloader or modifying the installer in some way?

      Systems do get rooted, and sometimes reinstalls from known clean media are necessary. If you reinstall from compromised media, you are actually worse off, because you get a false sense of security. Unfortunately most USB drives still don't have a read/write physical switch. Even if they did, I'd be reluctant to use them in some CYA environments; I can prove that my burned DVD of Ubuntu LTS could not have been modified after the disc was finalized. Can you say the same for your USB media? Same goes for backups. I love USB flash for its convenience, but it is actually a disadvantage in this situation.

    3. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      If the MacBook Air is any indication, Steve Jobs probably agrees with your that the optical drive is on its way out. I think he'd rather get rid of it entirely than have to upgrade it to deal with Blu-Ray licensing (which he's called "a bag of hurt").

    4. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Flash dies. So do magnetic media. Optical might suck but it's hardy, and it's cheap too! Costs pennies to press out and volume is negotiable. If you need 10k units? Do able. Need 1m units? Do able. I don't think magnetic media has that kind of flexibility.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    5. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 1

      Can't we just get rid of all those portable media ASAP?
      Flash memory may be more durable than CDs but they still break, especially the cheap ones.
      Just put everything on a server that can be properly secured.
      I can't remember the last time that I used a computer that was not connected to the internet.
      I prefer to have my files accessible online so I don't have to care about where the latest version of my file is stored or if the right stuff is on my usb key.
      Neither do I have to worry about the media being stolen, nor do I have to bother with encryption.

    6. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Flash is not currently suitable for OS upgrades. You want to replace a $0.05 DVD with a $15 flash drive? Are you nuts?

      DVDs also beat external HDDs for some scenarios. For one thing, they're cheap and immune to shock.

      I use all the technology at my disposal. I have reburnable DVDs for OS installs, Flash drives for transferring files, and a NAS with huge HDDs for backup and storage.

      If I had more upstream bandwidth, I'd probably send more files over the internet - but currently 16GB flash drives are pretty cheap and efficient.

    7. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd like something better than CD/DVD, but for now, they're still the cheapest bulk read-only distribution format. They're big, they scratch, and they suck to write to - but our usage pattern for optical is that we only really use them to transfer the data from them to a hard drive, so it doesn't matter much. Mostly they're still used for audio and video, though, because of all the existing hardware that uses them.

      Alternatives: The network requires us to trust someone to NOT backstab us a few years later. Part of that means it'd also require them to let us make non-encrypted backups on the media of our choice that they don't have the power to render inoperative some years later when the next version comes out.

      Flash is still several orders of magnitude too expensive to be used as disposable like optical discs are. IIRC, it can't be pressed with data already on it the way optical discs are, and write speeds on cheap flash are still low. (2 MB/sec on the low end, 6 MB/sec on the high end. DVDs are more like 20-30MB/sec). But if someone decides it's a wise strategy to mass produce microsd cards as disposable at whatever capacity can be sold $1/card, yes, they could replace an awful lot of things.

      While we're dreaming, I'd kind of like to see tape go away as backup too. Optical isn't cheap enough or high capacity enough, and hard drives aren't reliable enough. Many-layer optical media was supposed to be able to handle it, but the tech development didn't happen as fast as planned :( Stacks of blu ray media still costs many times as much as the equivalent capacity hard drive.

    8. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by GiMP · · Score: 1

      I usually use PXE for installations, especially, but not only, when dealing in an environment large enough to be affected by media costs. For times I'm in a "small environment" and PXE seems unreasonable, such as when helping a friend at his house, a single flash drive can be rewritten whenever an image is required, at a minor time expense no worse than burning a DVD, but without the size, noise, heat, weight, or scratches. As far as the costs are concerned, less than half of my flash devices have been purchased (generally when I needed something high performance for a camera or phone), the others have been swag from conferences. (As I glace woefully at my Sun Microsystems 2GB flash drive)

    9. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      such as when helping a friend at his house

      You're lucky. Most of my friends don't have motherboards that can boot from USB flashdrive.

      I would take it if it were an option, for the read speeds alone - but usually it isn't.

    10. Re:Floppy? Bring on the death of the CDROM. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      When I can plug a flash drive into my car without aftermarket additions we'll talk about not buying CDRs anymore :)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  99. Just bought a box last week. by Distan · · Score: 1

    Just bought a box of floppies last week. Had to do a firmware update on a system. Update could only be run from DOS. System doesn't support booting from USB, and the firmware update was to fix a bug that prevented booting from CD. Floppies were my only good choice.

  100. The Romanian government uses them ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a company in Romania, you have to submit your tax statements to the local IRS ("Finance administration company" would be a rough translation).

    You have to do this at least 4 times a year (even 12 times a year, if your business is quite big). Each time, you have to provide a floppy disk with some information, which you give to the clerk together with your tax paperwork. 4 times a year X ~ 750'000 companies in the country = a minimum of around THREE FUCKING MILLION FLOPPY DISKS EACH YEAR !

    This has been going on for at least 10 years, so you can figure out how many floppy disks were bought just in Romania.

    Personal rant: the collection mechanism is so absurd and retarded you wouldn't believe it. The paperwork is printed by using software provided by the finance ministry, which seems to be designed to break every possible ergonomic rule (think different sized buttons, one green and one purple red, adorned with Microsoft Office clipart). You input your data into this software, which writes *something* on the floppy disk. I got curious one day, and looked at what it writes: ONE LINE OF TEXT. No kidding. One entire floppy disk for ONE LINE OF TEXT. Ah, and you can't use one floppy disk for the same statement, they have to be separated. And when you submit your papers and floppy disk, normally worn floppy disks can't usually be read (offices are dusty, floppy drives get clogged frequently) and you have to get back with a newer one which will finally work in the old floppy drive.

    As I said: 3'000'000 floppies each year, sheesh...

  101. Re:Sony by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Others have already pointed out that this was covered on Slashdot, but I'm not sure how you even managed to post in this story without noticing that the link to the Slashdot story about Sony announcing that they are stopping floppy production was the first link in the summary.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  102. Coasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to go back to using them for coasters after I broke the coffee cup holder on my computer.

  103. Dell shops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell still distributes bootable driver updates that have to be downloaded, copied to floppy, and then installed from the boot floppy. I end up doing this a couple of times a month.

    Probably other OEMs do this too.

  104. Medical equipment by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for a company that produces a specific type of medical equipment, and since I do all the support and service for units sold in the USA, I still have to support units with floppy drives, which are still as new as 5 years old. Even on units less than a year old, I still need to use a floppy drive to run some diagnostics on them because the single-board computer won't boot from USB. Also, memo to USB flash drive manufacturers: please make more of them with write-protect switches on them!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  105. Grocery Stores by Naznarreb · · Score: 1

    The IBM Sure-POS system is extremely old and and extremely popular and features registers and controllers that have to be reloaded via floppy disk. Wal-Mart, Kroeger and Supervalu all use that system in at least some of their stores/banners.

  106. Re:Sony by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        Well, it's kind of like the manual that comes with your car. Everyone has one, but no one reads it until they're broken down on the side of the road. Much like Slashdot, it's not very useful except to tell you stuff that you already knew. :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  107. The same people who buy 8 tracks and casettes? by dens · · Score: 1

    And those that insist I send them faxes instead of emails in 2010?

  108. We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, too. by h00manist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Supporting old stuff means tougher standards, higher compatibility. Floppies were a pretty terrible standard, but they lasted forever basically because nobody could ever agree on a new standard. SuperDisk LS-120 was late, plus didn't catch on. But. Old phones work fine on today's network. Cars work with today's gas and roads. Old televisions work with today's services and electricity. But try to run some old BINARY. Chancer are better if you are using a closed-source OS. Unfortunately, stuff just lasts longer than technology, or tech-people, would like. People enjoy using the stuff they have paid for, sometimes with sacrifice, they expect it to work, fix it if broken, etc, and they are right. Lots of stuff lasts decades working. Computer stuff generally doesn't, and somehow we techies find it great and laugh at people when they want old computers and programs to work, as if we actually liked it when it happened to us. We have old stuff that we would like to be more useful too. There are old programs that sometimes cannot be replaced easily, but the environment and hardware for them is somehow basically nonexistent. Yes, recompiling and recoding works - but why does Linux always have to rely on that, and other systems less so, having better binary compatibility?

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
  109. How else would you install Windows 7? by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    1,808 disks beats 4,994 miles of punched paper tape.

  110. Windows users and BIOS updates... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    I've encountered plenty of corporates which keep a box of floppies around, primarily to bootstrap windows (prior to 2008/vista you had to load storage drivers from floppy if they werent in the default install) and to perform bios updates...

    Also at least one place includes floppies in their monthly stationary orders, even tho noone has used them in years. Someone who works there was telling me how he has to throw out all the unused floppies to stop them filling up the stores.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Windows users and BIOS updates... by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      A tool for slipstreaming drivers onto xp finally allowed me to throw away my last floppy.

  111. windows server installs on funky disk controllers by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1
    "press F6 to install....".

    I had to buy a box a few months ago for just that purpose. I think I'll keep it around for 5 years or so, just in case.

  112. Re:I know who's buying them by gimple · · Score: 1

    That's what she said.

    (Am I doing it right?)

  113. Late-night Home Shopping Network buyers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  114. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by swimin · · Score: 1

    Your point about the binary is precisely why having the source code is preferable to a compiled application.

    If every app had it's source code distributed with it's binary, being locked in to old platforms would rarely happen.

    With the source code, and some following of basic standards that have been around forever (like POSIX) it's not terribly difficult to get pretty much any app to work on pretty much any platform

  115. Supply Demand by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    1) Buy lots of floppies. 2) Wait for production to cease. 3) ???. 4) Profit$$$

  116. I loved floppys by devent · · Score: 1

    I used to try to format 3½ floppy disks with bigger capacities, i.e. 2.88 MB. Used to use a cool DOS application, which can show information for every sector, i.e. is it formatted, damaged, etc. Took me 30 min or more to watch it try to format and maybe fail.

    Now I have 16GB and more USB sticks which take under 1 min to format to ext4.

    --
    http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
  117. Corporate purchasing? by sohp · · Score: 1

    I still see boxes of floppy disks in the office supply cabinets of big companies. I suspect somewhere high up in corporate purchasing they have a supply purchase schedule that still says that every month they need to restock their cabinets with some large number N. Eventually in a corporate cost-cutting move someone might go through the list and trim it. Then again, they might try, only to have it come back that someone IMPORTANT needs those floppies and no the company can't stop buying them.

  118. Legacy Hardware by jojo78 · · Score: 1

    Legacy hardware still in use all over the world?

  119. Bodyshops use Sony Mavicas still by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work with lots of body shops and everyone who still has one that works seems to prefer the Sony Mavica

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Mavica#Digital_still_cameras_with_storage_on_3.5.22_floppy_disk

    They only want 640x480 size pics because they have to upload them to the insurance company's and often anything bigger will cause problems.

    They buy lots of disks cheap, take the pics of a car and put that floppy disk in the file folder(hard copy file) rather then printing them all out. Back in the day they use to put the negatives in the file

  120. Injection Molding Machinery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Injection Molding machines that I've worked with (Engel/Arburg/Battenfeld/Demag) often use floppy's to store particular settings for specific molds.

    However, alot of newer machines are being outfitted with USB and network ports aswell, to allow larger collections of settings or remote operating from where ever you can acces the network.

  121. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by groman · · Score: 1

    As much as I like open source, I think that's a pretty bullshit argument. Most applications are not "following of basic standards that have been around forever (like POSIX)", and practically you will have much better luck if you find statically compiled binaries than some obscure source and spend a week just tracking down all the bug-for-bug compatible compiler versions, libraries, etc.

    It's much easier to run a DOS 3 binary today then it is even to compile a simple C program something that includes

  122. Laughing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I laugh at people who dare proclaim the death of the floppy. I remember Wizard of OCWizard.com proclaiming, "never underestimate the power of a floppy" - and he was absolutely correct.
    First, most Windows OS's still use floppies for F6 drivers - and in a lot of cases, USB emulators simply don't work.
    Second, there are emergency repair disks (again, for Windows) - which can be quite helpful in a pinch.
    Third, having a working floppy drive on a system pretty much guarantees access to that system as long as you have physical access to it.
    CD's, USB, Firewire and even eSATA can't make the same boast, especially if drivers required for their operation are missing, damaged, or require an OS to load first.

    I'll always build my systems with floppy drives in them, whenever I can. It's just smart.

  123. Re:YOUR MOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Seriously, your mom does love floppy disks. She has been using them for years and she doesn't save much data so she doesn't need an external hard drive. Plus all the media card formats are soooooo confusing, there are like 4 types of SD cards and her CPU doesn't have a slot to stick them into anyway. Removable media cards are also so small that she loses them or can't see them when she doesn't have a bifocals handy. Your Mom loves floppy disks!

  124. floppy disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see them being used at the library to make resumes and to store small amounts of info. Saves alot of time over burning to a CD-R

  125. AMIIGAAAH!! by Oasiz · · Score: 1

    Just another proof that amiga still rules (and atari sucks) and that people still actively need more floppies to copy games !

  126. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The second link mentions Sony in the sub-headline.

  127. Library of Congress by BigSes · · Score: 1

    They have to back all that information up somehow. Its all in .arj format stored across MULTIPLE volumes!

  128. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by xaxa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Supporting old stuff means tougher standards, higher compatibility. Floppies were a pretty terrible standard, but they lasted forever basically because nobody could ever agree on a new standard. SuperDisk LS-120 was late, plus didn't catch on. But. Old phones work fine on today's network.

    Mobile phones? Pre-GSM ones don't work in the UK (and presumably other countries), they turned off the old network.
    Landline phones? The ones that only do pulse dialling don't work with most "Press 5 to do X" systems.

    Cars work with today's gas and roads.

    No they don't -- many old cars required petrol with added lead.

    Old televisions work with today's services and electricity.

    Many countries have switched to digital TV.

    Old stuff often only works if some parts are upgraded. Your old TV works (with a digital converter box) and your old car works (if you add a special chemical to the petrol).

    Old Linux binaries can be made to work (I assume you're referring to problems with shared libraries?). It probably helps to know what system they're supposed to work with. It might require some technical knowledge.

    If old closed-source stuff doesn't work, good luck fixing it.

  129. Re:Sony by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

    Rule 1 of Slashdot: Never RTFA
    Rule 2 of Slashdot: Never RTFA

    Yeah, like I have time to read the rules.

  130. Rumor has it ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... that AOL is stockpiling them in preparation for a large mailing to drum up new subscribers.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  131. Someone I know will! by joocemann · · Score: 1

    We have a plate luminometer from the mid 90s (runs windows 3.1) in a lab I am working in. A colleague and I repaired it and made it usable last year.

    It has a 3.5" floppy drive. That drive will be the only way we can get the data from it when we make our first use of it in coming days.
    ----

    In short: People who use older equipment for lack of funding are going to use floppies.

  132. Re:Aircraft navigation equipment still uses floppi by narcc · · Score: 1

    They could benefit from a flash to floppy adapter:
      http://www4.shopping.com/xPO-JVC-FlashPath-CUVFM40U

    While you can still buy them, I don't know if JVC is still making them.

  133. Theater Light Board by DDHoward · · Score: 1

    At my local theatre, our light control board (an ETC Express 48/96 4110A1004) uses floppies as its only form of backing up information about the current show, other than using a very old print device, about twenty pages, and half an hour. Levels, cues, submasters, effects, profiles, the patch, etc. We generally use two backup disks, alternating between the two every time a backup is needed. As one of the two is usually archived away, a supply of additional disks is needed. Luckily, I discovered around 30 disks in old boxes in my closet last week, enough to last another 5 years.

  134. Short term reliability by sharkey · · Score: 1

    They do great for short-term storage, but have to be replaced frequently. Smart money says that at least half of the floppies I have stored on the fridge have reached the end of their reliable life and I won't be able to get my files. So I have to go by new floppies that are at the beginning of the 1st half of their magnetic decay half-life.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  135. Re:Who'd be wasting money on outdated technologies by Temkin · · Score: 1

    No kidding... I did my internship at a US Govt. lab. We were still using hard-sectored 8-inch floppies for science instruments in 1993. PDP-11/03's no less...

  136. libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    old people

  137. Who is buying them? Anyone who hasn't heard(of)HxC by D4C5CE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the HxC Floppy Drive Emulator (in SD and USB flavors) which works even on Amiga and accurately down to rendering old-school marvels such as playing music by drive noises.

    Painstakingly hand-made in small numbers for now, if that's not a project to be spread from high-volume automated production lines by the likes of Seeed, then what is?

  138. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

    I agree! Now if I could only get this 40 year old FORTRAN payroll program to compile...

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  139. Software licenses by sonic_assault · · Score: 1

    All of the Siemens industrial control softwares we use at my workplace use floppy disks for their licenses. It's fairly standard for a lot of control software as far as I've heard. Why they still use floppy disks when a HASP dongle would work? I don't know. Cost?

    --
    Dress for success AND excess.
  140. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

    Computers don't run on BINARY...they run off electricity.

    When they are running off of electricity they *interpret* binary and *attempt* to perform something useful.

    Just like a car - It runs off of gasoline and attempts to perform something useful.

  141. "stiffie" by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    ...is the correct term.

    --
    No sig today...
  142. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by darkain · · Score: 1

    You're examples really are not the best.

    Cars switched to Unleaded gas. All previous cars needed an addative to use modern gasoline. While this change was many years, ago, it still did occure.

    Old televisions dont "work" properly with modern broadcast, this is why we have an intermediate box (such as a Digital Converter Box, Cable box, Satalite box, etc). The old "standard" television broadcast no longer exists.

    Classic telephones are the next to go out the door. Classic analog lines are on their way out the doos in favour of VOIP style services.

    While I do absolutely agree with your argument, I think the examlpes could have been better.

  143. Semiconductor Industry is using thousands by LeepII · · Score: 1

    I know a ton of semi conductor tools that use floppy drives to back up the runs made on them. Considering some tools can see hundreds of runs a week it is probably where a considerable amount of them are going.

  144. You caught me! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    I use them to back up my 5TB RAID array...

    --
    That is all.
  145. Still selling SW on them by KC1P · · Score: 1

    I still sell my software commercially on 3.5" floppies. Honestly I'm just goofily proud of the fact that 1/4 million lines of assembly code builds into an .EXE that fits on one disk with space to spare for the .PDF doc, but more importantly, I bought an old automatic floppy disk duplicating machine ages ago and I love it (mailing out mass updates was used to be a nightmare but now it's a piece of cake). Every robotic CD duplicator I've seen for less than 3x the price is a flimsy plastic toy.

    I'll bet I won't be able to get more custom-printed floppy labels any more when I run out (and OK yes they're pin-feed so I can add the version # and copyright year with a dot matrix printer; this is all retro-themed stuff if that isn't obvious) so that's probably when I'll have to switch to using CDs no matter how expensive it is. But shipping 1.1 MB on a (much more delicate) CD is just so STUPID!

    Meanwhile I use floppies all the time in day-to-day life ... I have three computers in my office running three different OSes and floppies are what they all have in common. Why mess with what's always worked?

  146. those were the days! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In India, atleast till 2003 you couldnt do without a floppy disk! if you were a student, and wanted to take print-out for your assignment from an internet cafe, you would be armed with a floppy disk! And hoped the darned thing would read. Because downloading stuff by mail would take eternity! I still remember being amazed by a "thumb drive" :)

  147. Re:Sony by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

    There are rules?!

    --
    I'm Peggy.
  148. My colleciton of floppy disks by Aeros · · Score: 1

    I actually go through several thousand per month as I am in the process of backing up the entire internet on them. Of course things change from time to time so I have to go back and back up even more. But I know they are sturdy and reliable so I will keep using them for as long as I can.

  149. my ex-boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my ex-boss bought like 10 floppy drives about 2 years ago (because they were so cheap!).

    I bet he's the one buying the millions of floppies.

  150. drives by slick7 · · Score: 1

    not only do I have a 3.5 inch drive, I also have a 5.25 inch drive and floppies. I can enforce an incompatibility issue any time I want.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  151. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by jp10558 · · Score: 1

    No they don't -- many old cars required petrol with added lead.
    Well, it probably depends on what you mean by old. Your average 15 year old car didn't need lead, and mostly "just works" assuming of course that all the physical parts work. Your average 15 year old software? Much less likely to "just work" even though the code is an *exact* copy of the original.

    Heck, with computer hardware we have that problem like ISA cards - used for lots of industrial machinery that itself is fine, but try connecting one up to a modern PC. The one adapter I've found is flaky, the one motherboard I've found with ISA slots is a custom PC build. At least USB to Serial works well or I'd really be screwed.

    --
    Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  152. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by gemtech · · Score: 1

    fyi: unleaded gas was mandated with the 1975 model year cars, the first year for the catalytic converter. So if your car is 35+ years old, you're driving a collector/antique car anyway and are accustomed to the hassles of making leaded gasoline (or you've changed the valves/valve seats).

    --
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
  153. RAID DRIVERS! by wired4fx · · Score: 1

    RAID drivers!!!!

  154. I've heard such comments before on this topic... by Benfea · · Score: 1

    ...and frankly it floors me. How can a company be advanced enough to build equipment like that, but not advanced enough to allow for a more modern means of storing data on an external device?

  155. Anyone remember *analogue* electronic cameras? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Gods, remember the damn digicams that had full floppy disk drives on them?

    Some of the first wave of commercially-released *analogue* electronic still cameras from the late-1980s- including the pre-digital versions of the Sony Mavica- used floppy disks. The recorded pictures were single composite-encoded NTSC or PAL single frames and recorded onto the disc itself in analogue format.

    (Something interesting to bear in mind if you find yourself- as I sometimes do- automatically thinking of "digital" and "electronic" still photography as being synonymous).

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  156. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by Derleth · · Score: 1

    Cars work with today's gas and roads.

    No, not if they need leaded gas.

    Old televisions work with today's services and electricity.

    Not in the US they don’t, unless some old TV maker had a time machine and access to ATSC hardware, or if your definition of an ‘old’ TV includes TVs recent enough to be cable-ready and you have an analog cable hookup.

    Yes, recompiling and recoding works - but why does Linux always have to rely on that, and other systems less so, having better binary compatibility?

    I can run 32-bit binaries on my 64-bit system just fine. I just need the right libraries, just like with all of the other software I run. I don’t know what you’re talking about.

    --
    How can you use my intestines as a gift? -Actual Hong Kong subtitle.
  157. Re:Who'd be wasting money on outdated technologies by dwye · · Score: 1
    So? That year, I was working in a private company that ran equipment based on PDP-11s, including one that had to be booted from switches. Our 8 inch floppies were soft sectored, though, so I guess that was more advanced than you :-)

    Instruments usually run on older hardware, since who wants to redo something that worked properly, years ago, unless there is a really good reason to change to a new design (like not being able to get parts for the old designs, any more). Any improvements that do show up will most often be in the form of better sensors, not human or machine interfaces.

  158. BIOS updates and settings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flashing BIOSes in manufacturing...

  159. my dad is buying them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because he does not see any reason to change his machine, and it has a floppy read/write unit and only a cd reader.
    His machine is a little bit recent it has only 8 years or so...
    The previous one was better and faster, it was running CP/M so now he does not want to change for a machine that will be even slower than the one he has now :-)

  160. And the standard still lives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine a few years ago wanted to know what info the magnetic stripe on his credit card had, so he fiddled around for a while experimenting (I think he probably did some research too). He found that it's the same format as floppy disks. He built himself a reader out of an old floppy drive.

  161. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by h00manist · · Score: 1

    With the source code, and some following of basic standards that have been around forever (like POSIX) it's not terribly difficult to get pretty much any app to work on pretty much any platform

    Of course it's nice to have the source. But time is limited, and if open-source mandates every user has to know how and have time to modify programs, it will continue to be only for techs. It's much much more useful if the binary still works and nothing *needs* to be changed. Sourceforge is full of people trying to figure out what good is the source code, and just forgetting about it. Unfortunately there's more chance of a user figuring out how to run any program, old or new, on a closed source OS, and I believe that is the single, primary reason open source OS's don't advance much in terms of users -- the users can't figure out how to run programs.

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
  162. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cars work with today's gas and roads.

    No they don't -- many old cars required petrol with added lead.

    Old cats DO work with today's lead free petrol. It's not the most efficient, but they work. I happen to have a still working Beetle from 77, and because it's very difficult to find leaded fuel today, I simply put unleaded fuel onto it, and it works...

  163. Still in some Medical apps too by drfreak · · Score: 1

    I have a few electronic claim submitters who still run their practice management under DOS emulation in XP. Due to some type of sandboxing, the DOS app can't write the actual windows drive but can write to a floppy. The few poor people who still have this system need to write their claims to a floppy, then copy the file from the floppy to the local hard disk to send to me via SFTP.

    Recently, I had a support call from one of those offices and they were getting errors from my file transfer software saying the file failed CRC check. It turned out they had been using the same floppy since roughly 2006 and it finally crapped out. All they needed was to buy a new one and format it, but I was impressed because floppies did not seem to me to last that long with daily or weekly use. I guess they just got lucky the same floppy lasted four years.

  164. Lighting consoles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some lighting consoles use 3.5. It's only newer ones that use usb or have internal hdd, and many of those can cost over $10k-20k to purchase.

  165. A matter of cost by pspahn · · Score: 1

    If I want to go purchase a TV born the same year I was in the 70's, I should be able to find one with enough effort. If I want to plug that TV in and play some NES Baseball, I could probably get that working as well if done right. Maybe I want to watch Tube on it (Tube - noun - 1. A web based broadcast of visual media. Why can't that be coined?) and I could figure out the right adapters and eventually get it to work well.

    If I want to go purchase a hammer born the same year I was in the 70's, I could eventually find one and use it exactly like I would any other regular hammer. Sure, there are new hydraulic-atomic-mega-blaster-hammers out there that might do the job better, but my regular old hammer still does its job because it is cheap and it is perfect.

    The problem with cars, tv's, tubes, and Apple is that they all solve a problem their own capitalistic way. Not everybody wins. Except carpenters.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  166. Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4000 users using
    2 floppies a month to backup who have to
    buy 10 floppies to get 1 that actually works
    --------
    is
    --------
    80000 floppies a month and
    960000 floppies a year which
    rounds up to a million.

    How many people are we really cutting off?

  167. Floppy for 3490-C11 Tape Drive Controller by dbIII · · Score: 1

    My IBM3490E-C11 tape drive boots up on floppies you insentive clods!
    Admittedly it's only being used as a table until the space is needed and I can get three other guys to help me move it, but if the newer 3490 tape drives bite the dust it can still handle single tapes.

  168. Re:Sony by slick7 · · Score: 1

    will it shred?

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  169. Not just XP. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Hell, i had to use a floppy to install RAID drivers for Win7! The motherboard manufacturers page didnt have just the drivers available for the RAID controller for me to put on a flash drive, and the chip manufacturers site didnt have the correct driver either. BUT the mobo manufacturer did have a driver floppy creator exe. It was a weird situation. AND, of course as soon as i got everything installed and ran windows update it updated the RAID driver...

    Wasnt THAT old of a motherboard either, 2004...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  170. Windows 2003 Server still requires them by xQx · · Score: 1

    To do a Windows 2003 Server Automated System Recovery (ASR) you MUST use a 1.44MB floppy disk.

    Yup, that's right folks, if your server doesn't have a floppy drive, and you need to restore it, you need to install a floppy drive.

    A USB key or CD-R just won't do it.

  171. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    Old cats DO work with today's lead free petrol.

    I'm pretty sure that cats aren't big fans of petrol, leaded or not.

  172. bavarian engineers use floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    German structural analysis software RSTAB is shipped with license files on a floppy. Yes, in 2010.
    At least they are also able to e-mail you the files if you ask.

  173. subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haxor ma vas rad

  174. Punch cards by coder111 · · Score: 1

    Now imagine same process with punch cards. Entire forests would have to be cut down to make enough of these...

    --Coder

  175. Re:We need standards, good ones too. For Linux, to by godefroi · · Score: 1

    True. Having recently struggled with something even as recent as Solaris 7, I know it's painful.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  176. Re:I've heard such comments before on this topic.. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I would guess part of it is that some systems are modular, so changing connectors or storage means that the new iteration of your machine won't work with controller stations that it otherwise would, or vice versa.  Also lots of new code additions to deal with USB or ethernet and so forth. It just isn't worth the cost when the current approach works.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  177. Electoral Justice in Brazil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently, all Electronic Voting Machine from Brazil uses a floppy as the main transport media. This is about half million floppies!

  178. +1 Insightful by Burz · · Score: 1

    Extremely well said!