Slashdot Mirror


Ball Lightning Caused By Magnetic Hallucinations

KentuckyFC writes "Transcranial magnetic stimulation involves placing a human in a rapidly changing magnetic field powerful enough to induce eddy currents in the brain. Focus the field in the visual cortex, for example, and the induced eddys cause the subject to 'see' lights that appear as discs and lines. Move the field within the cortex and the subject sees the lights move too. Physicists have calculated that the fields associated with certain kinds of multiple lightning strikes are powerful enough to induce the same kind of visual hallucinations in anybody unlucky enough to be within 200 meters or so. These fields ought to induce hallucinations that would take the form of luminous lines and balls that float in front of the subject's eyes, an effect that would explain observations otherwise classed as ball lightning, say the scientists."

269 comments

  1. Doesn't explain... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't explain people having captured ball lightning on video from in some cases miles away.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Doesn't explain... by Zobeid · · Score: 1

      What's your source on that? I've never heard of any such videos.

    2. Re:Doesn't explain... by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. Heck, my great grandmother used to tell the story of the time ball lightning broke the living room window, did a circle around the room and went back out, leaving scorch marks on the ceiling. But then, it's a story from the great grandmother, so take it for what it's worth.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    3. Re:Doesn't explain... by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Let me go find the video I took. I think it's on the same tape as my UFO abduction and ghost sightings ...

    4. Re:Doesn't explain... by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I looked on youtube. The second hit seems to be missing for me, my browser is reporting the swf as not found. The third one in Saudi Arabia appears to be the lightning moving along the power lines. I suspect that these guys in TFA could be right, but that the term ball lightning is ambiguous, referring to several different phenomena.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    5. Re:Doesn't explain... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's lots of claimed videos, e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ioN-3UWYrY

      Are there any scientifically verified videos? Elefino.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Doesn't explain... by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Interesting

      there are photos in encyclopedias and on web.

      I've seen ball lightening from distance of half a mile, and it's been created in lab

      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/01/070122-ball-lightning.html

    7. Re:Doesn't explain... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh wow, I feel so proud, my first ever [citation needed]

      Do I get a Slashdot "Achievement" for that?

      I didn't expect anyone to take my comment seriously. Every video ever seen showing "ball lightning" appears to be either edited heavily or easily explained away as something else.

      Carry on about your day, good sir.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    8. Re:Doesn't explain... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      What's your source on that? I've never heard of any such videos.

      Surely you have heard of Google and YouTube... search for "ball lightning video" and you will find bunches. I suspect with some digging, you will find some that were shown on various science/weather shows on TV as well. The article authors seem to have overlooked the video evidence - unless they can come up with another (erroneous) theory claiming that videotaping such an electrical effect and watching the video later causes the same effect as experiencing it.

    9. Re:Doesn't explain... by Dthief · · Score: 1

      do you have examples?

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    10. Re:Doesn't explain... by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Or being able to create it in a microwave. -- If ball lightning is just a stable plasmoid, that is.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    11. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe these magnetic hallucinations affect video equipment as well.
      Or maybe the hallucinations get transferred through the video. </sarcasm>

      (linked video is garage-style experiment, but others in lab settings achieve similar results)

    12. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Doesn't explain people having captured ball lightning on video from in some cases miles away.

      Wow. While we're misreading things and jumping to false conclusions not implied by the article, let me also point out that LSD doesn't explain real spiders.

    13. Re:Doesn't explain... by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absurd, you'd might as well also claim the Fox Alien Autopsy video and all the various close encounters of the blurred kind on Youtube aren't explained by the fact that we now understand things like kanashibari. The videos of so called ball lightning out there are far away, shaky, defocused and about as convincing as Chupacabra photos in the Weekly World News.

      Look, I'm sorry to piss on everybody's parade, but its time to relegate ball lightning to its rightful place in history alongside phrenology and N-rays. The invention of the CCD and the associated UNBELIEVABLE proliferation of personal digital imaging devices over the past decade means that virtually everyone has a camera in their pocket at all times now. If the phenomenon of ball lightning existed at all, we should be seeing like one multiply reported HIGHLY CONVINCING video a week uploaded to the internet showing this. In fact, the number of ball lightning sightings and recordings over the past who knows how many years has pretty much stayed constant. If ball lightning exists at all, it's in the heads of observers, either as a result of a terrified mi-d thunderstorm hallucination or a result of some magnetic field induced phosphene as reported in this new paper.

      If ball lightning were an actual physical phenomenon, the number of video observations of it should have skyrocketed over the past 10 years along with the availability of personal digital imaging devices in the same way that once Red Sprites and Blue Jets were first reliably observed with very high speed video in 1994, observational replication around the world was practically IMMEDIATE and widespread.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    14. Re:Doesn't explain... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh wow, I feel so proud, my first ever [citation needed]

      Do I get a Slashdot "Achievement" for that?

      You would if you could:
      * Provide the requested citation
      * Post a link to a goatse domain showing a guy with his balls on fire (this is for all intents and purposes considered 'ball lightning')
      * Find a way to blame another /. poster
      * Combine any or all of the above into a super-mega-post

      I didn't expect anyone to take my comment seriously.

      Well, that happens around here so often that they really need a moderation tag for "Whoosh!"

    15. Re:Doesn't explain... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there any reason not to consider the option that this artificial phenomenon might have little to do with alleged observations of ball lightning?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:Doesn't explain... by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the third video in that list you are talking about showing "BL" in Saudi Arabia is very important for everyone to see. How many times have we heard of people having BL sightings around power lines or "following power lines"? Frequently! And what does that video show? NOT BL! It's just arcing between two of the power lines that's traveling down the line Jacob's-ladder-like, probably due to wind. Was it initiated by lightning? Maybe, but it is not BL at all. People trust their senses and their assumptions way too much.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    17. Re:Doesn't explain... by taniwha · · Score: 1

      nor does it explain why two people can see the same thing

    18. Re:Doesn't explain... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      unless they can come up with another (erroneous) theory claiming that videotaping such an electrical effect and watching the video later causes the same effect as experiencing it.

      What the fuck. How can you expect to be taken seriously about science at all when calling a theory "erroneous" that DOESN'T EXIST YET.

      I just came up with the theory a little earlier (to save them the work) so they can use it to explain their previous erroneous theory. ;-)

    19. Re:Doesn't explain... by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I have concluded the same thing about Will-o-the-wisps. The only image of one online that looks convincing is an "artist's rendering".

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    20. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't explain people having captured ball lightning on video from in some cases miles away.

      Or the rectal probing....

    21. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      well me and a bunch of other people in an open air cinema, a clear summer night, saw a ball travelling over us at high speed in a (seemingly) horizontal trajectory. For years I thought I saw a meteorite, but then I witnessed a real meteorite coming down and it was completely different (the tail of the lightning was almost non existent).

      That can't be explained by the "all in your brain" theory: too many witnesses, no storm, the lightning localized in the sky (a small part of the FOV for all of the involved parties who were watching the screen and the hallucination would not know the right moment to disappear, beneath the screen).

      So, feel free not to believe me, but IMO magnetism has nothing to do with some of these lights.

    22. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, I guess you have never ever taken a college class that involved eye witness testimony? Multiple people observing the same event will always have a large variance in recall, based upon their own personal background. Having a small variance in recall is always a sign of collusion, intentional or unintentional. If a group says they all saw the same event, good money says they have been talking to each other, reinforcing recall till you might as well just interview one of them, since they will all give the same testimony.

    23. Re:Doesn't explain... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny

      my great grandmother used to tell the story of the time ball lightning broke the living room window, did a circle around the room and went back out, leaving scorch marks on the ceiling.

      Your grandmother has a Tyler Durden complex?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > Virtually everyone has a camera in their pocket at all times now.

      Most people with such gadgets live in urban areas awash with artificial lightning and spend their lives indoor.
      You have a point nonetheless but it's weaker than you think.
      Plus, I don't understand your eagerness to jump to conclusions for anybody else. Very religious of you.

    25. Re:Doesn't explain... by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oooh yeah I'm really religiously "jumping" to conclusions. We've had DECADES to flesh this one out and the evidence is not there. The onus is on the claimant to prove the phenomenon exists, not on me to prove it doesn't. The religious ones are the ones who take flaky anecdotes and blurry photos as real evidence and reject any skepticism about their credulity as "hasty". No.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    26. Re:Doesn't explain... by littlewink · · Score: 1

      "showing a guy with his balls on fire (this is for all intents and purposes considered 'ball lightning')"

      That would be Joe Mulroy, Fall of 1967.

    27. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    28. Re:Doesn't explain... by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Oh.. Ball "lightning".

      I thought it was something painful involving bleach or scissors.

    29. Re:Doesn't explain... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1986-ish Radio Electronics magazine had a study where they took pics of ball lightning that originated from arcing around a generator onboard an old engine on a train. I will mention this since I know it's brought up further down in the discussion, the ball lightning only *originated* from the arcing, it however did NOT just follow the power lines like a Jacob's Ladder might but rather had quite the mind of its own, scaring the bejesus out of the researcher when it entered the cabin of the train and began to approach him. I should have this issue archived somewhere so I can verify this at some point soon.

      That said, I do have a VR device that induces the feelings of motion in the brain through electrodes(1 on the forehead and 2 behind each ear on the "mastoid process") that when cranked high will induce visual hallucinations for a second or two...but they wouldn't make me think I was seeing ball lightning.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    30. Re:Doesn't explain... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Yet what you provide as proof against its existence is actually just a statement about electricity.... Remember, electricity follows the path of least resistance and copper in power lines provides far less resistance than does air, so perhaps it's just able to "live" longer with power lines around. I've got a friend who once saw what he assumes was ball lightning and he wasn't remotely close to power lines(he was in the woods) but also wasn't remotely close to a camera. He only mentioned it made a crackling sound and moved very erratically...at first he thought it might be a UFO but then realized it was definitely from this earth.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    31. Re:Doesn't explain... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      That said, I do have a VR device that induces the feelings of motion in the brain through electrodes(1 on the forehead and 2 behind each ear on the "mastoid process") that when cranked high will induce visual hallucinations for a second or two...but they wouldn't make me think I was seeing ball lightning.

      Interesting! What 'VR device' is this? I haven't heard of inducing feelings of motion with such things... do want more info! I'm getting a mental picture of Eight from the movie 9.

      Also, do these visual hallucinations remain stationary with respect to the world around you, when you move your head/eyes? Bright lights on their own can cause spots in front of your eyes, but since they're fixed w.r.t. your field of vision, they're easy to tell apart from actual entities in the world. I'd imagine that if these hallucinations are caused by induced currents, something similar would apply?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    32. Re:Doesn't explain... by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...let me also point out that LSD doesn't explain real spiders.

      HOLY SHIT THOSE THINGS ARE REAL?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    33. Re:Doesn't explain... by effigiate · · Score: 1

      I'd be really surprised if that was phase to phase arcing on the power lines. At least in the US, there are protection measures in place that detect phase to phase arcing and will kill the power to the overhead lines. These have been in place for years, I doubt Saudi Arabia doesn't have similar systems in place.

    34. Re:Doesn't explain... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      Seems to be a pretty common occurrence, whatever the cause.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    35. Re:Doesn't explain... by Myopic · · Score: 2, Funny

      at first he thought it might be a UFO but then realized it was definitely from this earth

      Dude, that's just what they want you to think!

    36. Re:Doesn't explain... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      heck, if we're going with anecdotal evidence, my entire immediate family can attest to an event of ball lightning launching itself out of a box fan into the middle of the living room, wandering a bit, then vanishing.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    37. Re:Doesn't explain... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i recall hearing about a similar effect observed traveling along a electric cattle fence during a thunder storm.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    38. Re:Doesn't explain... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      iirc, some of the ball lighting stories talk about spheres of light that would pass through solid objects without damaging them.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    39. Re:Doesn't explain... by lennier · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find there's prior art in Otis Blackwell, 1957.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    40. Re:Doesn't explain... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      There could be many different sorts - e.g. mini blackhole:

      http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1290235.ece

      Whether it is a blackhole or not, whatever happened at Donegal was rather impressive. If it's lightning it'll be pretty amazing too.

      --
    41. Re:Doesn't explain... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Neither does it explain the damaged pattern caused by the explosion of such a thing.
      But nevertheless, I thought the explanation was found already, ball lightning is supposed to be a charged plasma field.

    42. Re:Doesn't explain... by Shompol · · Score: 1

      The lab stuff bounces off the floor, while the thunderstorm phenomenon is reported to be weightless. Obviously not the same thing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7fUKEGyxS8

    43. Re:Doesn't explain... by mpe · · Score: 1

      He only mentioned it made a crackling sound and moved very erratically...at first he thought it might be a UFO but then realized it was definitely from this earth.

      So how did that help in identifying it? The term means Unidentified Flying Object...

    44. Re:Doesn't explain... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what you argue:

      1. Researchers claim that their theory could possibly explain some ball lightning sightings as hallucinations.
      2. There are videos of possible ball lightnings.
      --------
      3. Therefore, the researchers must be wrong.

      Formulated more formally (note that I exaggerated the positions for the sake of readability):

      1. There is at least one ball lightning sighting that has been caused by a lightning-induced hallucination.
      2. There is at least one ball lightning that was captured on video.
      --------
      3. From 1 and 2 follows: Nothing; the two premises contradict each other. // Logical error

      I'm sorry, but "there is" premises (using the existence quantor) can't be refuted by using another such premise. If you can prove that one or even all ball lightning videos are genuine you still can't disprove that ball lightning can be magnetically induced hallucinations.
      If you were to prove that all ball lightnings ever witnessed were captured on video you would have an argument but realistically all you could possibly disprove is the claim that all ball lightning sightings are hallucinations, which the scientists never made.

      In fact, the scientists didn't even claim that even one such sighting was hallucinatory in the way described. They only claimed that magnetically induced hallucinations could explain some of the sightings since they match typical ball lightning descriptions.

      In short: The only erroneous theory is the one you have about what the researchers claimed, which can be refuted by actually reading TFA or even TFS. TFA does go on to generalize a bit but neither the researchers' quotes nor TFS suggest that the researchers ever talked about their theory applying to all ball lightning sightings.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    45. Re:Doesn't explain... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Is there any reason not to consider the option that this artificial phenomenon might have little to do with alleged observations of ball lightning? One should consider a variety of options here. But if you have artificial phenomena that appears like natural phenomena and is generated under similar conditions, then you should also consider the option that the two are related.

    46. Re:Doesn't explain... by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not so fast, what do most people do when a severe storm blows in? They put their camera away and run for shelter. Unlike Sprites and Jets, ball lightning is typically small and often seen close to the ground such that you won't capture anything useful from miles away.

      Most of those digital cameras out there are in the possession of people who have no idea how to take a well focused non-blurry and non-shaky picture or video with them in even the best conditions. In addition, they're mostly cheap cellphone cameras with barely adequate lenses that are just about good enough to take a few snapshots while out with friends. The odds that they would get a decent picture of a light source that isn't just a big blur and doesn't look like a reflection from the lens are nearly nil.

      The key to getting good images of sprites was to figure out a few places where they were nearly sure to be seen and to get ready in advance with high end cameras fixed to good solid tripods. A bunch of amateurs with their disposable Kodak cameras and cellphones still won't likely photograph a blue jet.

      There are several easily reproducible phenomena that might be what people are describing or it might be something else (even magnetically induced eddy currents in the visual cortex).

      There is actually little doubt that ball lightning is a real phenomenon. There is a great deal of doubt as to what it is. There are a number of crackpot theories that are almost certainly wrong. There are a few good theories that might be correct. It's hard to gather enough evidence to say which is better since we haven't narrowed down where one should go and under what conditions to reliably see any. It's down to sheer luck.

    47. Re:Doesn't explain... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Video cameras are electronic devices too. Wouldn't induced eddy currents affect them in a similar way?

      And if there electronics is delicate enough, they might be fried from a bigger distance than the human brain.

    48. Re:Doesn't explain... by DeusExMach · · Score: 1

      No, you're right. In those cases, it probably really IS ball lightning. But some reported cases of ball lightning might actually be hallucinations, and not the real thing.

    49. Re:Doesn't explain... by DeusExMach · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I was growing up on my grandpa's dairy farm, he used to tell us kids not to pee on the electric fence. When HE was pressed for further citation, his response was, indeed, "Ball lightning."

    50. Re:Doesn't explain... by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      I think it's safe to say that ball lightning is a phenomenon of the past, and it's very rare anymore, it's no longer being observed at the rate that it has been through the centuries.

    51. Re:Doesn't explain... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, electricity follows the path of least resistance and copper in power lines provides far less resistance than does air, so perhaps it's just able to "live" longer with power lines around

      Don't anthropomorphize electricity, it makes it mad.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    52. Re:Doesn't explain... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Heck, my great grandmother used to tell the story of the time ball lightning broke the living room window, did a circle around the room and went back out, leaving scorch marks on the ceiling.

      Well, with solid scientific evidence like that to back you up, who's going to argue?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    53. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > We've had DECADES to flesh this one out and the evidence is not there
      a possibly fake observation hasn't been documented in incontrovertible ways after decades, therefore it does not exist. Galileo would be proud.

    54. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it doesn't explain the fires and explosions caused by ball lightnings in the unfortunate houses where those buggers have manifested themselves into. And it doesn't explain why a ball lightning moves with the slightest of air currents like a human breath or draft. The theory is another manifestation of the old classic "if we can't explain it, or haven't seen it, it doesn't exist. The people claiming otherwise are crazy or delusional."

    55. Re:Doesn't explain... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1
      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    56. Re:Doesn't explain... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Blowing dust/sand can generate some pretty good static charges. I wonder if that has something to do with it?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    57. Re:Doesn't explain... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Thank you, sir!!(please someone mod the parent up) That sounds like the issue. My only problem is that I don't recall if I started my subscription in 85 or 86...I guess I'll know shortly when I find the box with all of them in it.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    58. Re:Doesn't explain... by ehrichweiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The device is called MotionWare and was released as a prototype about 10 years ago. The inventor had a hard time getting it to the fast track so the 100 prototypes he made are all that exist. It uses electro-vestibular stimulation to generate the sense of motion(though only through one "channel"[the inner ear] of the three, at least, from which we sense motion[inner ear, proprioceptive and visual]).

      Anyway, the hallucinations/visuals seemed to be generated right around my forehead where the front electrode made contact and were always at that spot regardless of where I looked. They were always triggered by cranking the power output up to the maximum setting(I have VERY high skin resistance so this was necessary for me to feel the movement). I attempted to bring this up to the inventor but he didn't seem quite as interested in it as I was. I've since shelved the prototype I bought since I don't really do VR research any more; shame, someone should get some real use out of it as I know it's still functional.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    59. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm perplexed why there aren't more videos. But I can testify that ball lightning is real and doesn't match the magnetic stimulation version described in the article.

      As kids, we lived down the street from a tree that would generate ball lightning during dry thunderstorms. My brother and I would hear it first. Crack ... Crack ... Crack crack! We'd seen and heard the show enough times to know we could run to a window or the screen door and watch colored globes drift around the tree until they would explode. There might only be 1 to 3 at a time, but an episode might produce dozens.

      Two people, hearing and seeing the same thing, moving on the other side of a screen door, window, and tree branches (the light wasn't superimposed on our vision), witnessed from different rooms. Simultaneously and repeatedly.

      Why didn't we take pictures? It was 1982 and we were kids. Never realized that we were seeing something so incredibly rare. To us it was common.

    60. Re:Doesn't explain... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      How would a mini blackhole be floating instead of falling straight down to the earths core? That doesn't make any sense.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    61. Re:Doesn't explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's some people creating ball lightening in a lab:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx1GJnOBzFw

    62. Re:Doesn't explain... by aqk · · Score: 0

      Oh no!
      This doesn't involve Uranus, does it?

    63. Re:Doesn't explain... by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1

      That's probably bead lightning, a related phenomenon.

    64. Re:Doesn't explain... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Interaction with the Earth's magnetic field? It's got to generate a very strong magnetic field to slow the descent of the estimated 20 tons it weighs...

      Anyway I don't think the scientists are sure what exactly happened there, but they know something rather unusual happened.

      What else could it be? It seems even more unlikely that lightning did it. And hallucinations by themselves do not cause 90 meter trenches to be formed :).

      --
    65. Re:Doesn't explain... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      That would need to be a hell of a magnetic field, especially since it is pushing against the earths rather weak field.

      It is a curious story though. I tried looking for more information or pictures of the site but couldn't find anything on the web.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    66. Re:Doesn't explain... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      A super-strong magnetic field may not be so surprising when you already have a singularity :).

      Strange, unless my memory fails me, that Pace VanDevender guy used to have a website which displayed the Donegal site, and asked people to submit reports of similar incidents. But I can't find traces of that site anymore. Can't find it in archive.org either. Maybe my memory is bad.

      But the Pace VanDevender guy definitely exists, is a scientist and he definitely did write about it. And none of his peers have gone out and said he's a raving lunatic...

      Maybe he was really on to something and the military asked him to shut up :).

      Anyway here's what I dug up, I think these are pics of the site:
      http://www.geologywales.co.uk/storms/autumn06b.htm
      From a thread discussing it: http://www.ukweatherworld.co.uk/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=7952&start=1

      And also:
      http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~zcapc53/great_balls_of_fire.doc
      http://zseltvay.com/first_installment_extreme_ball_lightning.htm

      See the request for help from VanDevender at http://zseltvay.com/#A paper on (the link is #A paper on, but I'm too lazy to workaround Slashdot)

      --
    67. Re:Doesn't explain... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the links.

      Sure, it's a good possibility that a super-strong magnetic field would be associated with a singularity, but would it be super-strong in proportion to its super-mass? And we are not even considering the massive velocity that a singularity from space would hit the earth with. To travel all this way into the earth's magnetic field, rapidly decelerating, and then to come to a stop right at ground level? Would be remarkable to say the least! And then its magnetic field would also have to be oriented exactly right to be repelled instead of attracted or deflected...

      Oh well, lots of questions still. I guess that is why they call it a mystery...

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    68. Re:Doesn't explain... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > but would it be super-strong in proportion to its super-mass?

      Don't know.

      > And then its magnetic field would also have to be oriented exactly right to be repelled instead of attracted or deflected...

      Maybe it's related to Lenz's Law where induced currents in a moving object in a magnetic field generate a magnetic field that opposes its motion through the field.

      --
    69. Re:Doesn't explain... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      the ball lightening I saw did go downward

    70. Re:Doesn't explain... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Consider this, that for something to appear "weightless" near the surface of the earth, its average density must be *exactly" that of surrounding air. So if ball lightening appears to "float" in one situation, it could very easily rise or fall with the slightest change in air pressure.

  2. FDA Response by bughunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Feds will ban Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the assumption that it can be used recreationally.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
    1. Re:FDA Response by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Magnified transcrotal what?

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    2. Re:FDA Response by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Magnified transcrotal ovulation. Can't you read?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:FDA Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just call it LSD.
      no, wait! THC.
      damn it...

    4. Re:FDA Response by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      The continual transdingler?

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    5. Re:FDA Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...My scrotum...

    6. Re:FDA Response by fractoid · · Score: 1

      What? I've never met a pothead who tried to push anything anywhere, except maybe pushing Discovery Channel onto the TV.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    7. Re:FDA Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can be used recreationally: you can stimulate your pleasure center with it.

    8. Re:FDA Response by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that putting your head inside the LHC’s Atlas magnetic field will give you the best trip ever? ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  3. What the article fails to address by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is how effective Tin foil might be at stopping the hallucinations. They haven't stopped since I started wearing my hat, I'm beginning to doubt they are hallucinations like my doctor tells me.

    1. Re:What the article fails to address by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Informative

          You need to have your hat adjusted. I do tinfoil hat adjustments for only $499.95. Bring cash.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:What the article fails to address by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1, Funny

      Summary: Physicists have calculated that the fields associated with certain kinds of multiple lightning strikes are powerful enough to induce the same kind of visual hallucinations in anybody unlucky enough to be within 200 meters or so.

      Question: Is how effective Tin foil might be at stopping the hallucinations. They haven't stopped since I started wearing my hat, I'm beginning to doubt they are hallucinations like my doctor tells me.

      I'm not a doctor, but I predict undesirable side-effects from the interaction between your Tinfoil hat and multiple lightning strikes...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:What the article fails to address by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      Is how effective Tin foil might be at stopping the hallucinations. They haven't stopped since I started wearing my hat, I'm beginning to doubt they are hallucinations like my doctor tells me.

      "They" claim that tinfoil helmets don't really work: http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    4. Re:What the article fails to address by Trecares · · Score: 1

      Are you insane or a double agent? Cash has all kinds of markers on it, including RFID! The government has been tracking your subversive activities! I only accept payment in un-minted gold!

    5. Re:What the article fails to address by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Nah, I just have a plan. Change the cash on a regular basis until I can make it something less traceable. Drug dealers are good for more than just buying drugs from. They're some of the few people that you can change out $500 for another $500 without asking any questions. It's the aliens you can't avoid. They're in orbit watching your every move. Monitoring 7 billion people isn't that hard with the right equipment. They also monitor all the cattle, should they need to replenish their stock of "special" parts.

          I'm not that concerned about the aliens though. We have a special deal. I don't give out details on when they're doing flybys, and they won't pick me up until Dec 20th 2012. Good luck to the rest of you.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:What the article fails to address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so your an illuminati
      I do custom hat adjsutment but I only accept silver
      not some dirty illuminaty cahs

    7. Re:What the article fails to address by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You know the secret, you must now be disappeared. It's a good thing you posted as AC, we won't have to disappear many others.

          [waves hand]

          None of you saw these posts. Go on with your lives like nothing ever happened.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:What the article fails to address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow not one but two people simply don't get it. Satellites, magnets, radio waves, the government controls it all, especially the media. They use the media to tell you that tin foil hats will keep you safe, but it won't. It can't.

      Now listen carefully I shall say this only once and slashdot has an overload who may delete this post. You need lead hats. Yes LEAD. It's the only sure fire way.

      Don't tell anyone I said this.

      ...

      I'm posting as A C just to be safe.

    9. Re:What the article fails to address by DeusExMach · · Score: 1

      It's ok. He's probably an hallucination, too...

    10. Re:What the article fails to address by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      dO nOt trusT pAReNt! hE iS wORkINg fOr tEH gOVeRnmEnT!!

      PS can I have my $499.95 back?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:What the article fails to address by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, unless you want to be fried, I’d leave the tin foil away...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  4. Oh No! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now that they know how to create this phenomenon, this fad could catch on and lure our children into magnetic hallucination parties! Won't somebody think of the children!

    1. Re:Oh No! by Dthief · · Score: 0, Troll

      Its easy as 1 - Set up superconductor based magnetic field 2 - party 3 - profit

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    2. Re:Oh No! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      I love how mixed up people are these days, and the mere idea of hallucinating is associated with the most harmful of effects any chemical could have on your brain. When in reality, there are several natural, human made substances (like DMT, check it out) that cause you to hallucinate (near-death experiences anyone?). If magnetic fields do cause people to hallucinate, there aren't inherently any health problems. There may be health problems with hanging out in that much magnetic field, but if there's not, then this would be really awesome, and there's no reason on earth why we should "think of the children"
      I know you were being sarcastic, but people really do think that way :P

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    3. Re:Oh No! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      I know you were being sarcastic, but people really do think that way :P

      Fear of what we don't understand, or anything that goes against the grain of what we've become comfortable and complacent with, generally results in strong gut reactions that don't have the luxury of being reviewed by logic. I guess "fear" sums it up. Nothing latches a closed mind like a new possibility.

    4. Re:Oh No! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Near-death experiences can often be very harmful. ;)

      Based on common theories of how the brain learns stuff, I bet if I can cause your neurons to fire in certain patterns for long enough, I can established changes that persist. So I wouldn't be confident in saying there won't be any health problems without more tests/evidence.

      --
    5. Re:Oh No! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Oh definitely, haha. There would have to be LOTS of studies. I'm just saying, why are people so afraid of technology and progress? Its silly, progress is all we have and all we are.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    6. Re:Oh No! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Won't somebody think of the children!

      Don’t worry. The pope is “hard” at work on this. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  5. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are four lights!

    1. Re:Obligatory by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken, there are only three lights

  6. That would be awesome man...... by Technoodle · · Score: 1

    Unless you actually got hit by the lightning.

  7. What it Does Explain by MrTripps · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What it does explain is the convoluted plot of Lost. That's not a smoke monster, Freckles. Just electromagnetic hallucinations.

    --
    "I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
  8. Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by sonnejw0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those that suffer from migraines, these lights and balls should be familiar as "aura", or scintilating scotoma. For migraineurs, these lights last longer because they are caused by changing bloodflow to the occipital lobe over a longer period of time. It most assuredly activates the same neurons that this magnetic stimulation of neurons produces. I would not be surprised of reports of concomitant parosmia, or olfactory hallucinations, with the display of ball-lightning caused by magnetic fields.

    1. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by sonnejw0 · · Score: 1

      Also, the higher altitude regions, such as mountains, have higher electromagnetic energy due to being closer to the turbulent atmosphere. It's possible that this could result in hallucinations of all sorts, and explain the many mystic experiences of such regions.

    2. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If these are equivalent to migraine auras, I'm very skeptical that they can explain ball lightning. I've periodically experienced migraines and what doctors assure me is an aura preceding it. I don't know about others' subjective experience with auras, but while it's an annoying visual artifact covering some or all of my visual field, at no point did I ever perceive it as some localized 'ball' with anything like a defined position, distance relative to me, etc. as ball lightning is often described. It was always something I perceived as an internal static that makes my vision mostly useless, not some external object.

      Again, there could just be subjective difference, but I've never heard a fellow migraine sufferer describe an aura as some ball of light.

      For those that suffer from migraines, these lights and balls should be familiar as "aura", or scintilating scotoma. For migraineurs, these lights last longer because they are caused by changing bloodflow to the occipital lobe over a longer period of time. It most assuredly activates the same neurons that this magnetic stimulation of neurons produces.

      I would not be surprised of reports of concomitant parosmia, or olfactory hallucinations, with the display of ball-lightning caused by magnetic fields.

    3. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Having full-blown migraines with aura and other visual artifacts, and having seen ball lightning up-close (less than a meter), I can vouch that they are NOT even remotely close to the same thing.

      My sister saw it to, so that kind of blows the migraine theory out the window.

    4. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by nasch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It most assuredly activates the same neurons that this magnetic stimulation of neurons produces.

      Most assuredly, interesting. How do you know this?

    5. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's an interesting theory (and... erm... interestingly phrased) but what do you have to back it up?

      Having had migraines and accompanying "auras", I can safely say that there's no resemblance between the visual distortions from a pending or in-progress migraine and any external visual phenomena (never mind lightning or ball lightning). The other migraine sufferers ("migraineurs"? really?) I've known can confirm this.

      While I am the last to rely on anecdotal evidence, it's an improvement over no evidence.

    6. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by CraigoFL · · Score: 1

      I'll second this; it pretty much matches my experience too. My auras are an interesting experience (or would be if they didn't signify several hours worth of misery). It feels like a portion of my vision simply "isn't there"... not "blacked out" or anything, but just gone. I'm wondering if there's any relationship to the sensation of blindness.

    7. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by styrotech · · Score: 1

      I don't get migraines very often but I've had both the weird disappearing vision thing you describe, but I've also had swimming spots of light across my vision. Half the time the swimming spots are a precursor to the disappearing zone of vision.

      But the swimming spots of light definitely didn't appear to be something external out in the real world.

    8. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You report having seen ball lightning up close. This is very interesting. Could you please give some detail?

    9. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      I need more sleep... i read "scintilating scrotum"

    10. Re:Same Lights Common in Migraineurs, too by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      I would say you understand what happens since you experienced this several times. But people who did not experience such perceptual disturbances before might interpret it as a real object.

  9. idea != fact by Itninja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Typical of Slashdot. From TFA: "That's an interesting idea: that a large class of well-reported phenomenon may be the result of hallucinations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation."

    From the Summary:
    Ball Lightening Caused by Magnetic Hallucinations

    From 'interesting idea' to stated fact in record time!

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:idea != fact by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ball Lightening Caused by Magnetic Hallucinations

      It's clearly a bogus theory. In my experience, ball lightening is usually caused by filling it up with helium.

    2. Re:idea != fact by vbraga · · Score: 1

      Filling it with hydrogen will generate more "bright" lights, though.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    3. Re:idea != fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, sometimes magnetic hallucinations do cause ball lightening. But then you have to pay some poor tech to clean out the inside of the MRI.

    4. Re:idea != fact by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Well..., at least TMS from an LCD nearby causes the phenomenon of slashdotters jumping From 'interesting idea' to stated fact in record time!, I conclude.

    5. Re:idea != fact by largesnike · · Score: 2, Funny

      From 'interesting idea' to stated fact in record time!

      almost, Saddam's WMDs are still in front by a fair margin

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
    6. Re:idea != fact by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would buy into the "may"... in some cases. I also expect there may be more than one phenomenon that is called ball lightning.

      I used to live in a house that had plastic dome light shade in the room lights. After the light was turned off and they cooled down they would pop. That pop would create a Piezo generated electric field that would cause me to see a bright flash of light that wasn't there. It may have caused others to see ghosts. There have been reports of large amounts of geo-piezo activity in areas where ghosts, angels and aliens are often seen.

    7. Re:idea != fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I lighten my balls with my right hand.

    8. Re:idea != fact by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Is that the cause of the flash? Thank you, I had been wondering about that--my bedside lamp does the same thing, and although it's a flourescent it too has a plastic casing. Here I was starting to think I was some kind of synaesthete.

      (Synaesthete...what a funny-tasting word.)
      -f

    9. Re:idea != fact by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      It's a fair bet that so did every other guy you've ever shook hands with.

      --
      C|N>K
    10. Re:idea != fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new around here.

    11. Re:idea != fact by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The light may actually be there. A similar effect can be observed crunching hard candy in the dark.

    12. Re:idea != fact by Ibag · · Score: 1

      Yeah, though it's a common problem that reporting on science is overblown and inaccurate. Scientists make subtle claims, and reporters will simplify and exaggerate them. Whether this is through ignorance, a desire to make things more palatable for their readers, or a desire to make the article more punchy and widely circulated, I cannot say, though the further it goes through the news cycle, the worse it gets. This is a large reason why people don't trust science: when you oversell your case, people can tell.

      Relevant comic:
      http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174

  10. Ministory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My dad saw ball lightning at the warehouse he managed a few years ago. A ball went from the warehouse floor in to the office area (I believe it went through a wall to do this) and stopped above an employee's head, where it dissipated suddenly.

    I just can't see this entirely being a hallucination if it can be tracked with your eyes.

    1. Re:Ministory by IorDMUX · · Score: 4, Informative

      A ball went from the warehouse floor in to the office area (I believe it went through a wall to do this) and stopped above an employee's head, where it dissipated suddenly. I just can't see this entirely being a hallucination if it can be tracked with your eyes.

      Actually, this ability to be "tracked" is common in color/light optical hallucinations that are produced in the "front end" of your brain's visual processing, as opposed to more life-like and realistic (i.e. a deceased relative) visual hallucinations that occur father down the image-processing pipeline.

      You can demonstrate this on your own: Look just to the side of a small, bright light source for a few seconds, then look away, ideally towards a blank wall or other plain surface. (Don't stare into the sun or a laser or anything... I don't want people responding with "OMG now I'm blind!") If you did not focus directly on the light source to begin with, the "echo" of the light should appear slightly off center. As you move your eyes and/or head to try and focus on the echo, it will move away as the spot is fixed with respect to your retina, giving you the illusion of being able to "track" this visual phenomenon across a room or other space.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    2. Re:Ministory by takev · · Score: 1

      unless the ball is tracking your eyes.
      See, if it is a hallucinations in your visual cortex it would move with your eyes.

      Same thing as with floaters which you can sometimes see when the light is right, it is like it is moving around the room and you somehow try to follow it with your eyes, while it is actually following your eye movement instead. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floater

    3. Re:Ministory by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You haven't looked at a bright light before, have you? The dot will move to anywhere you are looking, and slowly disappear.

          If he saw a flash, and then looked over at his coworker, and kept his focus there, it would appear to be exactly that. The question then is, what was the flash? It could have been anything. A reflection of the sun, a spark of some sort. Did they do any sort of welding in the warehouse? There's a good reason you're suppose to wear a welding mask, and it isn't to keep the sparks off your face.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Ministory by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
      OMG now I'm blind!

      (Don't stare into the sun or a laser or anything... I don't want people responding with "OMG now I'm blind!"

      Oh. Crap.

    5. Re:Ministory by TedRiot · · Score: 1, Funny

      Personal note: When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once when I was six, I did. At first the brightness was overwhelming, but I had seen that before. I kept looking, forcing myself not to blink, and then the brightness began to dissolve. My pupils shrunk to pinholes and everything came into focus and for a moment I understood. The doctors didn't know if my eyes would ever heal. I was terrified, alone in that darkness. Slowly daylight crept in through the bandages, and I could see, but something else had changed inside of me. That day I had my first headache.

    6. Re:Ministory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG now I'm blind!

    7. Re:Ministory by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the lead-in to a bad horror movie.

    8. Re:Ministory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >OMG now I'm blind!
      (*)
      >> (Don't stare into the sun or a laser or anything... I don't want people responding with "OMG now I'm blind!"

      >Oh. Crap.

      (*) here some miracle occurs that makes you reacquire vision enough to go on reading, huh?

    9. Re:Ministory by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      OMG, now I'm blind!

    10. Re:Ministory by Slayer · · Score: 1

      That's a quote from the movie Pi by Darren Aronofsky, which just so happens to be a great movie, and definitely not a bad horror movie. The mods who downmodded the GP obviously don't know the movie. Pretty sad IMHO ...

    11. Re:Ministory by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1
      Eidetic memory, of course. I absorbed the information but didn't read it. Now that I'm blind, my mind is replaying everything I've ever read. On some level, it recalled this warning - because once my sight was gone, GP's post came immediately into my mental vision.

      So long, and thank you for playing.

    12. Re:Ministory by G4Z · · Score: 1

      From Darren Arronofskis film Pi, I think.

    13. Re:Ministory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try, but you couldn't have read the other AC's comment, so you shouldn't have replied to it.

    14. Re:Ministory by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Braille display!

  11. Scissors by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps this explains the appearance of a giant pair of scissors in the sky when performing the iron pyramid experiment.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Scissors by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Allow me to karma whore for a second....

      I don't remember the last time I ran into the Look Around You series. It's been awhile. If you don't know about it, or haven't seen any of it in some time, you should get an inoculation. Try this.

      In an attempt to add something useful to this discussion, I don't know what's more awesome - this theory, or ball lightning. I'm a fan of both!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Scissors by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps this explains the appearance of a giant pair of scissors in the sky when performing the iron pyramid experiment.

      I'd forgotten about that! Maybe it also explains the giant pliers on Google Street View:

  12. Why are we trying to prove it doesn't exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this is interesting research, what this has to do with the real phenomenon of ball lightning, I have no idea.

    As a famous scientist once said: "My visual hallucination effectively knocked over a tree in its path".

  13. That answers that, for me at least by alop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've often wondered why I "see" spinning disks (as the article described) when on road trips or on hot days. It's very odd to explain, the best analogy I could come up with was a "Video game style targeting system"... But seeing it explained as a hallucination makes sense.

    --
    --alop
    1. Re:That answers that, for me at least by Matrix14 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried shooting lasers when it happens?

    2. Re:That answers that, for me at least by alop · · Score: 1

      No, but I did throw a rock and it went right where the convergence point was... it was cool.

      --
      --alop
    3. Re:That answers that, for me at least by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Have you ever considered that you might be a battle cyborg of some kind that has simply lost its memory?

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    4. Re:That answers that, for me at least by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thanks for that. Skynet sends the Terminator back in time, it loses its memory due to all the lightning you see when he timetravels, and here you are telling him he's a bloody cyborg. ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    5. Re:That answers that, for me at least by CorporateSuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      He'll certainly have a lot to answer for if it turns out those spinning disks are really just the uplifting, smiling faces of pure-hearted children!

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    6. Re:That answers that, for me at least by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Nah, in such case he would have surely mentioned seeing 6502 disassembly right next to the targeting graphics.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re:That answers that, for me at least by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        1) Heat or stress induced hallucination

        2) An artifact from seeing a bright light (or reflection)

        3) A floater in your eye.

        4) Your telepathic ability to force an electrical discharge to not only not dissipate, but to stay in your view.

        5) An alien spacecraft with the specific goal of staying exactly where you're looking.

        Pick one. Nah, go ahead and pick 2. I'd go with #5 and #4 myself.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:That answers that, for me at least by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      A magnetic field? Maybe if you're under some big-ass power lines...
      For me, I get it that hallucination all the time when I'm dehydrated really bad. That, migrane, followed by nausea and/or vomiting. (Fortunately, it doesn't happen too often.)

  14. In Other News by mindbrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Transcranial Magnetic Stmulation is used to ameliorate auditory hallucinations in schizophrenics.

    --
    ideopath @ play
    1. Re:In Other News by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Transcranial Magnetic Stmulation is used to ameliorate auditory hallucinations in schizophrenics.

      So what you're saying is that ball lightning might be around everywhere but we're all suffering visual hallucinations masking its presence until we receive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?

    2. Re:In Other News by bendodge · · Score: 1

      And transatlantic hypoglycemic malapropisms can defenestrate your Alzheimer-suffering family members!

      --
      The government can't save you.
    3. Re:In Other News by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Transcranial Magnetic Stmulation is used to give people a reason to use the word ameliorate

    4. Re:In Other News by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that low-blood sugared similar sounding strings of phonemes that obliterate the meaning of an utterance can remove the windows from my kin that suffer from excessive cerebral amyloid plaque deposits?

  15. Explains a lot for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There has been a story in my family of ball lightning going through the old family house. And everyone thought it was really weird because even thought they saw it, they thought it would be impossible for such a thing to occur. That something would catch on fire, or the ball would be attracted to the wiring in the home instead of just floating away down the hall. Multiple people saw it, so they felt it could not be people "just imagining things". But if it was a hallucination created by eddy currents in the whole family (they were all in the kitchen together) that explains everything quite nicely.

    Way to go science, 50 year old family mystery is solved.

    1. Re:Explains a lot for me by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Possibly, but it seems odd that they would all see the same thing in the same position acting in the same way.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    2. Re:Explains a lot for me by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      They probably didn't. They all some sort of glowing orb moving around. They started swapping stories and their experiences converged.

  16. Can't be hallucinations by buback · · Score: 2, Funny

    A whole branch of my family was fathered by ball lightning! Happened back in the Great Storm of 1806. Granted, they always were the black sheep at the family reunions, but they were certainly real!

    Now tell me that's a hallucination. I dare you!

    1. Re:Can't be hallucinations by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      A whole branch of my family was fathered by ball lightning!

      I've never heard of that before, but I gotta admit that "ball lightning" is a much more exciting euphemism than "baby batter". I'm going to have to start using that.

      I'm pretty sure it's your whole family that was fathered by it, though.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Can't be hallucinations by mangu · · Score: 1

      A whole branch of my family was fathered by ball lightning!

      It's the same in my family too. When a kid is born, they always blame it on the balls.

    3. Re:Can't be hallucinations by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1
      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  17. Proximity is not causality by Xaedalus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Taken from a comment on the TFA's commentary, and it proves a point. I've always wondered why we tend to take scientific recreations in a lab and automatically apply them to phenomena to the world outside the lab as "absolutely the truth". Are we that desperate for a logical-sounding answer that we'll immediately say "these phenomena were reproduced in this lab using these specific resources and therefore this must automatically happen every time similar phenomena happens under uncontrolled circumstances"

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:Proximity is not causality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered why we tend to take scientific recreations in a lab and automatically apply them to phenomena to the world outside the lab as "absolutely the truth".

      These fields ought to induce hallucinations that would take the form of luminous lines and balls that float in front of the subject's eyes, an effect that would explain observations otherwise classed as ball lightning, say the scientists.

      Since when was saying "an effect that would explain" the same as "absolutely the truth"? Even reading the posts, almost no one takes this as proof that ball lightning is an hallucination. So who is this, "we" you mentioned.

    2. Re:Proximity is not causality by John+Meacham · · Score: 4, Informative

      We don't at all. The strongest statement the original paper makes is

      "Lightning electromagnetic pulse induced transcranial magnetic stimulation of phosphenes in the visual cortex is concluded to be a plausible interpretation of a large class of reports on luminous perceptions during thunderstorms."

      just plausible. It's the editors that decided to publish it as if it were accepted fact.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
  18. Cameras by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Cameras by IorDMUX · · Score: 2, Informative
      [Sorry for the double post... I just came up with this after a bit more searching.]

      Apparently it also affects cameras too.

      http://www.google.com/images?q=ball+lightning&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=univ&ei=48vpS-vZB8T7lwfijKn_Cg&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQsAQwAA

      I noticed that the majority of actual images of ball lightning that Google turns up fall into one of three categories: Illustrations, pictures of scientific experiments, or variations on this picture.

      Though I do think that this description of ball lightning sounds as viable as the TMS theory. (Summary: A lightning strike heats fractal silicon "fluff balls" on the Earth's surface which can burn violently and hold themselves aloft like ashes from a fire.) Perhaps we are looking at two entirely different phenomenon: TMS causing the "cool" ball lightning which can mysteriously appear indoors or in airplane cockpits and then disappears without doing damage, and the burning silicon vapor explaining the "hot" ball lightning which has been reported to cause damage and leave scorch marks wherever it goes.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    2. Re:Cameras by geekoid · · Score: 0

      !st off. This is about causing people to see balls of light in a strong magnetic field, not about ball lightning. The fact that you got all panicky about your pet belief shows how weak your proof is.

      Second, none of those images look even remotely like a unique phenomena. Most of them look like ccd errors.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Cameras by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a few phenomenon that are known to cause things like ball lighting.

      St. Elmo's Fire, for example, can look like a floating ball. Not usually, but it can, if it forms on an unseen point like a tree branch.

      There's probably other forms of ionization that we simple don't know about. There's plenty of ways to generate things that look likeball lightning is supposed to look, you can do it in your microwave. (Although that method does not seem likely to occur in nature.)

      And I love the idea that Will-o-wisps aren't real. Yes, half the cultures in the world independently invented the idea of lights rising up from marshy water. It's like that old world-wide myth that the stars could fall out of the sky, which, of course, we know is absurd, stars streaking across the sky and plummeting to earth is obviously crazy talk.

      I'm frankly astonished at all the people here who apparently think it's all a hallucination, which is, frankly, just stupid. Plenty of ball lightning has multiple observers and has been tracked for moderate distances.

      As has been pointed out, visual hallucinations are pretty easy to recognize as such, considering they either follow the field of view, if generated in the optic nerve, or the eyes, if some sort of vision after-effect.

      People who see fake lights and don't recognize them as such after about ten seconds as such are, quite likely, schizophrenic or have some other mental illness. Hallucination and optical illusions do not work that way in normal people.

      It's only when it's the brain itself generates stuff that it appears even slightly consistent with reality. No one can walk around tracking an optical glitch and think it's an actual floating ball in space.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:Cameras by darkstar949 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Burning mod points by saying this, but digging around on Google turned up a site that has an form lightning that I don't recognize that was captured by film - http://www.ernmphotography.com/Pages/Ball_Lightning/BL_Gallery1.html

    5. Re:Cameras by pcjunky · · Score: 1

      By your logic if we defend our point of view that ball lightning can't be caused by this then we are afraid of this idea. Of course if we say nothing then obviously we can't defend our point of view! My father has seen ball lightning twice. Both times he was not near a bolt of lightning. The second time several other people over 30 feet from where he was also saw it.

  19. Thanks For The Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did NOT ingest LSD.

    Yours In Houston,
    K. Trout

  20. This is your brain. by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is your brain on lightning. Get the picture?

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    1. Re:This is your brain. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Don't be so negative.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  21. 2008 News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's references from 2008 on the WikiPedia article for ball lightning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning

  22. I see what you did there by blair1q · · Score: 0, Troll

    The only paranormal phenomenon here is the granting of funds for this research.

    1. Re:I see what you did there by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because it has been modded up, I'd like to respond to the troll: on what basis exactly would you exclude funding for this research? Obviousness? Clearly not, because no one had any idea what a modulating magnetic field would do to the inner workings of the brain. Uselessness? Can't see how you arrived at that conclusion, considering that it indicates a way to manipulate how the brain processes inputs, which has a ton of potential application.

      No, the only reason that this is research unworthy of funding is that it doesn't immediately yield a product, which is the lamest, most short-sighted reason for which to deny a grant request.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:I see what you did there by blair1q · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, the reason that this research is unworthy of funding is that the researchers are the sort who would turn it into a search for the causes of ball lightning, or think that we don't know what causes it yet.

      Funding is supposed to go to people with competence to carry out science. These goobers failed.

  23. I'll call bullshit on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw ball lightning years ago and my ex-wife who was setting next to me saw it as well. I saw a rare form that was around a foot in diameter but it only lasted for around a second. Other accounts I've read had multiple witnesses and several involved physical contact, in one a woman actually hit it with a tennis racket and it fell to the ground before it popped out of existence. There are reports of it burning holes in objects including a sleeping bag, I've seen pictures of the damage. Also it's often described as having a popping sound when it disappears. There's even historic accounts of people killed by it. Add to this multiple photos I've seen of ball lightning. Sorry but a poor explanation of all the evidence.

  24. How long... by timboc007 · · Score: 1

    ... until the conspiracy theorists start wearing tin-foil hats in lightning storms? Double or nothing anyone?

  25. Explanation of "UFO" sightings? by ryan.onsrc · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this explains the "UFO" sightings by aviation crew and some astronauts? I would suspect that as one increases their altitude, they increase their odds of experiencing such an occurrence: with a statistical spike as one approaches/escapes the earth's atmosphere. As such this could even cause a "mass hallucination".

    That being said, I find it rather troubling that now "mass hallucinations" could be highly probable in environments with high magnetic activity. Perhaps astronauts should start carrying magnetic field detection gear (assuming they aren't already).

    1. Re:Explanation of "UFO" sightings? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      This clearly explains the "fear cage" phenomenon on Ghost Hunters.

    2. Re:Explanation of "UFO" sightings? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      re-reading my post - I believe I'm running the risk of being taken seriously - so let this post serve as a sarcasm tag.

  26. Rapidly changing magnetic fields? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    I don't care how fast you do it, there's only two albums.

    1. Re:Rapidly changing magnetic fields? by surveyork · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

      --
      2019 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop.
  27. hat time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not so silly now am I.

    Regards,
    Tin Foil Hat Man

  28. Why the fascination with ball lightning? by Xoltri · · Score: 1

    Can anyone explain why people are so interested in this? I never really understood it.

    --
    -Xoltri
    1. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by pavon · · Score: 1

      Scientists are naturally curious people that want to understand how things work. From all accounts, ball lightning sounds like a plausible natural phenomenon, unlike other mysterious popularly reported things like ghosts, bigfoot, or aliens. Furthermore, if some reports are true, ball lightning has some very interesting properties, and understanding the physics behind it could have big implications.

    2. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Ball" lightning is essentially impossible. Electricity cannot behave that way, as far as we know. And yet, many people claim to have seen it. So either it exists, and we'd like to learn how, or it doesn't, in which case we'd like to learn what those people are actually seeing.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    3. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I've always figured that ball lightning explained a lot of UFO sightings.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      Aaaand we have two totally contradictory answers to the parent question. It's a "plausible natural phenomenon" that's "essentially impossible."

      Yay, Slashdot.

    5. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says it's electricity? It looks like a ball, that accompanies lightning. It might be an unlucky bird vaporized to plasma.

    6. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you skipped "as far as we know."

      That is the important part. If ball lightening is real, then what we currently "know" is wrong, which means this is a learning opportunity. In other words-- science.

    7. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by astar · · Score: 1

      Impossible is a funny word. The classical electron is impossible (how could you possibly explain that dense a charge), but people did not make a big deal about it.

      So here a few uncited rememberances

      Some people saw some ball lighting go into a barrel of water and boil it all, completely as I recall. This gives a number for energy and it is much too high for a simple explanation.

      So the problem is there is too much electrical charge in too little volume. Sound familiar?

      I thought it was all cleared up decades ago with some sort of dynamic vortex theory.

      Personal story: from a reliable adult when i was in high school. A lightning storm. A big hit on a tree near some utility lines near the adults home. At a coincident time, claim of some ball lightning showing up on the kitchen counter, perhaps associated with telephone wiring and equipment. It moved down the counter and disappeared in the wall. A charred area was pointed out. So I suppose this was almost 50 years ago. The adult is gone. I assume the char spot is gone. So maybe you have hundreds of years of such reports. And we have thousands of years of religious oriented reports of miracles. It is fun to try sorting out the difference. Probably, it is silly to assign some uniform true/false value to all the reports in either example.

    8. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yhsy'd snoyhrt ysy, dlsdhfoy. Proplr fon't trsf yhr guvkinh styivlrd, yhry fon't trsf yhr guvkinh dummstird snf yhry fon't rbrn trsf yhr guvkinh podyd yhry str trplyinh yo.

    9. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      It's a fascinating psychological mystery if ball lightning doesn't actually exist, as a lot of people seem to believe it does - just look at the number of posts claiming sightings here on slashdot on this thread.

      I had never realised myself until now that it was so controversial, but it seems to be along the lines of believing in alien abductions.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Why the fascination with ball lightning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is the closest approximation of the phonomena that a few people have been able to recreate and document in their spare time:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE3dRBlQjTE

      Not literally a ball, but rather under certain conditions it's possible to make an electric arc discharge connect on both ends into a ring. So the ball is more of a donut. If there is enough current flowing through the surface of the plasma donut and following the right path on the topology, it does this funky thing where it makes a magnetic field that keeps the donut together longer than a typical arc discharge. And the fact that the plasma weighs no more than the air it's in and reacts to eddy currents, electrical charges, and magnetic fields should explain its sporadic and random behavior.

      Now if viewed at a distance and under conditions where the eye is unable to resolve the shape other being a very bright area of light, that's where it gets the ball name.

  29. More than one person? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    What about cases where multiple people see the same phenomenon, behaving the same way?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:More than one person? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Magnetic fields this strong wouldn't effect just one person.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:More than one person? by tftp · · Score: 1

      Magnetic fields this strong wouldn't effect just one person.

      Not in the same way. If several people see the same object with the same behavior, it implies transfer of shared information to all observers[1]. Normally that's light that reflects from real objects and is collected by any number of eyes. But if magnetic fields, especially "this strong", convey information, they would be changing fast, and thus induce considerable currents in all metal objects around. This is not associated with ball lightning.

      Another problem is that strong magnetic fields require either large area conductors (coils, plasma paths, whatever) or large currents. Either of those possibilities requires channels or power sources that are so far unknown to us. The only obvious source of a strong magnetic field is the lightning itself, it can carry plenty of amps. But many ball lightnings were observed without any conventional lightning strike nearby, and without any technology that is capable of producing those strong fields. Most people even today aren't anywhere near equipment that is capable of doing such things.

      [1] One can claim, of course, that some trigger can cause "playback" of some genetically coded information that is the same for all humans, that's why once triggered they see the same thing. Then you can get away with just one trigger bit, and the rest is "in the dictionary." However such uniformity of response to my knowledge haven't been observed in humans. Besides, that theory would need to explain why there is correlation of observations within any one observing group, but not across several groups that are observing different events.

      And of course there is sometimes material evidence of the encounter - besides photos and videos there are melted, charred and boiled objects. It's certainly puzzling that some BL causes such charring and some BL is inert. It's like BL is 3D sections of 4D objects, and depending on where the section is made you perceive different effects. That explains BL appearing and disappearing out of thin air, though it is generally associated with storms.

  30. So by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Either the hallucinations can be transmitted via video too, or a piece of this airplane caught fire and fell off.... Looks like "ball lightning" anyway - whether it is or not I leave to the physicists.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:So by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      They're called sparks Einstein, nothing "fell off" the plane.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  31. So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap. by derinax · · Score: 1

    I'm not a neurologist, so school me. But look, we all know when we are having ocular hallucinations. Press on your closed eyes for a while and open them. There's no perception of depth to it; no sense of "oh, that hallucination looks like it's hovering over that hill 30 meters away." Now, these are allegedly affecting the visual cortex directly, but still...

    How would a magnetic field hallucination within the visual cortex create a sense of binocular depth, and consistently track to a static location in space, within each input to the cortex? It's _obvious_, isn't it, when we hallucinate? Just flick your eyes a bit and move your focus, and watch the hallucination follow.

  32. My grandfather had on passing thou the house by Khenke · · Score: 0, Redundant

    My grandfather told me about when a ball lightning came in thou the door in the basement, made a 90 degree turn in front of him and passed thou the door to the boiler room. And then went in the boiler.
    It was roughly 20 cm big. And left a burn mark on both doors. And there was the smell of ozone. So even if what he saw could be explained be a hallucination, it still would not explain the burn marks after the ball.

  33. Re:So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh squiggly line in my eye fluid.
    I see you lurking there on the periphery of my vision.
    But when I try to look at you, you scurry away.
    Are you shy, squiggly line?
    Why only when I ignore you, do you return to the center of my eye?
    Oh, squiggly line,
    it's alright, you are forgiven.

  34. That explains it by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    This effect can be easily prevented by the judicious use of tinfoil headgear; hence it's popularity in areas subject to lightning strikes.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  35. There's a simple test for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just turn your head. If you still see it, maybe it's not really there. Was it really necessary to mess with people's brains using expensive equipment to come up with this theory?

    1. Re:There's a simple test for this. by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      If you turn your head, the magnetic field will be different in your brain, so the hallucination might change as well.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:There's a simple test for this. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Was it really necessary to mess with people's brains using expensive equipment to come up with this theory?

      Of course not, but it was more fun that way. Mwah hah hah.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  36. I've seen ball lightning from less than one meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sister witnessed the incident.

    Hallucination? Can a hallucination start a perfectly round fire where it entered the house, then melt the telephone ringer coils that it disappeared into with a loud bang?

    What we saw was a bright orb about a foot across bouncing slowly around the house for a few seconds. It did no damage except where it entered and exited the house

  37. I did some "ball lightening" this morning by Monolith1 · · Score: 0

    This actually sounds plausible, I did some "ball lightening" earlier today, and I was sort of hallucinating at one point.

  38. Could it be? by Ozlanthos · · Score: 1

    Yesterday I watched Jesse Ventura's conspiracy show on Youtube. The subject matter was HAARP. The scientist that Ventura's people interviewed described the exact same events as being effects that can be induced by use of the HAARP array. Got to wonder now how much of what else was said of it could possibly be true!

    -Oz

  39. Re:So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Eh, I dunno. Some types of hallucinations are somewhat less obvious. Mushrooms and LSD come to mind. Also, auditory hallucinations (the type often caused by severe sleep deprivation) definitely have volume and distance. It makes sense that it would be possible to manipulate the visual cortex in some way as to cause hallucinations that also contain depth perception. High powered EM fields directed at specific parts of your brain are somewhat more exotic than "pressing on your eyeballs" after all.

  40. Summon Ball Lightning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pff, everyone known that Ball Lightning is caused by tapping three Mountains.

  41. A complex standing wave by ZeBam.com · · Score: 1

    Imagine the very complex and dynamic standing wave of the magnetic field around a biological brain. Can it be duplicated with a machine to produce coherent thoughts in a biological brain by magnetic induction? Can two biological brains induce such coherent activity in each other? Could this be the basis of the legendary powers of telepathy that so many have claimed to possess throughout history?

  42. Re:So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I pointed that out above.

    Hallucinations only appear to have 'real locations' if your brain is generated them, aka, you're mentally ill.(1) The eyes or the visual cortex generating them is pretty easy to figure out. Moving your head or eyes would, due, make the object move in sync. So I have trouble seeing anyone getting fooled by that at all.

    If you only see if for a second or so, sure, you can get fooled...we've all thought we saw something out of the corner of our eye, or opened a door and perceived something that wasn't there before our brain corrected itself.

    But not only does 'ball lightning' show up for longish periods of time, I have trouble conceiving that people would actually be this stupid in the first place if it didn't...if I see some bright flash and it goes away, I assume, duh, that was some trick of my eyes.

    1) And it doesn't even really work like that. You just 'perceive' them without them really being in any location or whatever. It's like dream logic, where your bicycle ride can somehow include a conversation with your aunt. Somehow, they are there, talking to you.

    Seeing invisible-to-everyone-else people walking around in your environment is just TV. Same with seeing a floating glowing ball that you can wander around and look at from multiple sides. Not one has ever imagined that, using their eyes, visual cortex, or brain. There is simply no possible biological way to do that.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  43. Spotted. by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    I have seen ball lightning, it can't have been induced by magnetic waves I was wearing my tinfoil hat at the time!

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  44. Does this also explain... by 3seas · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ufo and alien sightings?

  45. they're angels by ndmccab · · Score: 1

    I've been seeing them 4 years. Whatever.

    1. Re:they're angels by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they're angels?

    2. Re:they're angels by DeusExMach · · Score: 1

      Because the devils have horns.

    3. Re:they're angels by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I don't have horns, am I an angel?

    4. Re:they're angels by DeusExMach · · Score: 1

      ...sure you are, sweetie.

  46. Unlikely : focused. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    I would not be surprised of reports of concomitant parosmia, or olfactory hallucinations, with the display of ball-lightning caused by magnetic fields.

    That's unlikely as the reported experiment are focused on the visual cortex in the occipital region (Visual region stimulated => Only visual hallucination).
    But theoretically by focusing on other sensory regions, other kind of hallucination could be produced.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  47. Wrong conclusion by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would be helpful if people actually read reports of ball lightning sightings before they jump to conclusions.

    Is this a possible explanation of some ball lightning sightings? Well it could be.

    Does it explain them all? Definitely not. Ball lightning has been observed many times to do lots of damage. It has also been observed in areas where there has been no lightning or storm activity at all. Including sunny days. Read up on it then make up your own mind. This is not a simple phenomenon. No one explanation seems to explain it all and perhaps there are multiple physical mechanisms to create the reported glowing balls of light with wildly different properties. I read a monograph some years back which detailed about 2 dozen different scientific theories and many good witness accounts showing the mismatch to each of these theories. Well there have been even more theories since, each of them compelling and reasonable ... and contradictory. The real problem of course is that the data is from witnesses, it is not repeatable so the theories cannot be tested against each other.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:Wrong conclusion by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be a bitch if the same conditions that produce hallucinations of plasmoids also produce actual plasmoids. In fact, this may actually be the case.

      I would be much more receptive to this new theory if it were not for the fact that free-floating electrical plasmoids have been shown to exist.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  48. I somehow doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My neighbor, myself, and a baby sister saw ball lightning when I was a kid. We all saw it in the same place traveling the same direction. Another neighbor in a different house saw it just before it leapt into the house where I was and seemingly disappeared into the fridge. If it was a hallucination how could all of our experiences be exactly the same?

    1. Re:I somehow doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to add, I've never had a migraine headache before in my life.

  49. I beleive... by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I saw ball lightning from about 6 to 10 inches away, eye level, then it slowly dropped to my knees, then slowly back to eye level.
    It hovered a second, then shot to the other room and blew the base board off the wall.
    The nails that held on the base board were melted, but the wood was fine. /I still swear it was sentient and it communicated. //The other room was the only safe place I could think of, for it to hit. ///Yeah, maybe it DID influence my brain waves.....

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  50. Aliens by Alexvthooft · · Score: 1

    This does explain all the Alien Sightings over the years. They were simply hallucinations!

    --
    Be yourself and aim high!
  51. Form Constants, Anyone? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Everybody who ever has experienced any of these visual disturbances should be aware of the concept of form constants

    I think I may actually know the one you are talking about. It's like leapord spots spiraling inward, and they tend to be darker than the background. Solution? Drink more water. No kidding. However, by the time you see them it's usually too late.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Form Constants, Anyone? by Matrix14 · · Score: 1

      Whoa, I've seen those. Thanks for telling me what the hell it is!

  52. Re:So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about others.

    I started having hallucinations some time ago. The hallucinatios were extremely complex... auditory, visual, tactile. Sometimes I saw smoke and it was exactly like the real thing.

    Even though I knew it was not real there was no way to convince myself during an episode.

    After a while I went to a psychiatrist and take meds for my disorder now. No episodes since then.

    You underestimate the power of the human brain.

  53. Personal experience by scotts13 · · Score: 1

    I've seen this phenomenon from just a few feet away. Immediately after a massive thunderstorm, a ball entered through my bedroom window, and exited through another at the bottom of the stairs. The hallucination theory is interesting, but doesn't explain two partially-melted window screens.

  54. Mass hallucinations? by Bryan+Bytehead · · Score: 1

    I've seen ball lightning. So have the people that I've been with when I saw it. We would have to be hallucinating at the same time, and we would have to be hallucinating the same thing.

    --
    Bryan
  55. Magazine Article in Radio Electronics Years Ago by Rubinstien · · Score: 1

    Years ago (20-25?) I read an article in Radio Electronics magazine where they were artificially creating ball lightning. There were photographs. They had modified the electrical system of a diesel locomotive; basically put in a huge knife switch that would let them cut the current in an instant. The resulting arc would heat the interior up by several degrees instantly, and produce ball lightning that would bounce around the cab of the engine.

    Never seen any myself, but Indiana isn't exactly a normal place to see it.

    --Rubinstien

    1. Re:Magazine Article in Radio Electronics Years Ago by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that, I think there was an episode of Eerie Indiana dedicated to it.

    2. Re:Magazine Article in Radio Electronics Years Ago by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Probably the March '85 edition, cited here:

      http://eece.ksu.edu/~gjohnson/Search1997.pdf

      Too bad I can't find the article itself.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  56. Modded Informative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only on Slashdot...

    1. Re:Modded Informative? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You'd understand if you had a properly adjusted tinfoil hat.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  57. first-person view by proto+opus · · Score: 1

    so the ball of blue fire that came out of the telephone in our kitchen during an intense thunderstorm, dancing across the room, knocking my mother ass-over-teakettle before grounding itself in the clock on the stove (ruining it) was JUST something i hallucinated?

    1. Re:first-person view by surveyork · · Score: 0

      Yes. Science has spoken. :)

      --
      2019 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop.
    2. Re:first-person view by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Don't be obtuse. Nobody is saying that.

  58. Bunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this were true, we'd have a whole lot of trippin' RF Engineers running around.

    While RF Engineers are an interesting bunch over-all, I haven't heard of any who see ball lightning at Radio, TV and other communications transmitter sites.

    FAIL

  59. Angels and god too? by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    This might also explain people seeing angels and gods during violent storms? Or maybe they're just hallucinating because they are gullible? Seems quite hypocritical when a Christian claims that ball lightning does exist because no one can prove it's existence.

    1. Re:Angels and god too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there's that silly old ball lightning proof of God, now refuted. And of course, this explains why so many people see angels during violent storms. Perfect and articulate logic.

        If I had more mod points to add to the intelligent moderation for your comment, I'd get you up to +5.

  60. Re:So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

    Run for the hills! The Vogons are upon us! Run!

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  61. Could this be related... by DeusExMach · · Score: 1

    ...to the "strobe-light" effect I sometimes see late at night when I'm trying to fall asleep? Close my eyes, and I see fluctuating "flashes" behind my eyelids for a few seconds that don't seem to be coming from any lights in the environment. Maybe some sporadic electromagnetic or other RF interference?

  62. Yep, saw that on TNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Wesley Crusher and Ensign Lefler have to save the Enterprise from a game that worked like that?

    http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68518.html

  63. Ball Lightning in a microwave by Zot+Quixote · · Score: 0

    I remember seeing articles on how to make ball lightning in a microwave, complete with video. Then again, people may be lumping a lot of things under the header ball lightning.

    Honestly, what you could create in a microwave wasn't that impressive, especially considering I had been brought up being read old Reader's Digest stories about ball lightning basically stalking people. I'd assumed that was just fiction (though they claimed it was true for whatever that's worth), but maybe there's something to the hallucination theory.

  64. Yum Yum. Magnetic Hallucinations... by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    I was fifteen when lightning stuck about 15 feet away from me.

    I saw the air get bright blue, and then I was getting up off of the ground. I never heard the thunder, I felt it. The shock wave literally knocked me on my ass.

    Afterward, I had three separate "epileptic episodes" where I was convinced I "SAW GOD". However, now I know that all the synapses in body brain were firing all at the same time, making me feel and think EVERYTHING at once. (((If this is death, then bring it on!)))

    But alas, I know that it was just an electro-chemical response to the shock to my system. Reality can be quite a let-down when you analyze things from a scientific standpoint.

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
  65. Re:So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    'Smoke' is not a thing. You were almost certain imagining 'things smoking', not 'smoke' per se.

    For example, seeing things 'glowing', aka 'auras', is a not uncommon effect of migraines. Your visual system adds glowing light around and things, and that moves correctly three dimensionally. (Because it's being added to objects in the processed image of your field of view.)

    Other hallucinations can happen in the same way. You can hallucinate that something else is invisible. Not that you can't see it, that it's invisible but you can see it. Your brain assigns it the attribute of 'invisible'.

    Or 'fake', that's a pretty common one. You can see people and think they're fake, or tables are fake, or whatever. This is often a 'hallucination', because things in photographs look real.

    And you yourself might have hallucinated something 'smoking'.

    But all these have one thing in common. It's your brain taking something that actually exists in your field of view, something with actual coordinates, and altering it in some manner. Of course this object moves correctly in space, because it's actually there, you're just seeing it wrong.

    Of course, there is a way to hallucinate and add things, but you add things everywhere. For example, you can imagine a room is full or water, or full of, tada, smoke. (An especially terrifying one is the entire room being full of fire.) Maybe that's what happened with you.

    That is pretty much the only two ways your brain can 'add' things. Either it edits something else or it adds them everywhere...or they're clearly hallucinations because they don't occupy space correctly. (Or, like I said, were so dream-like they don't occupy space at all, they're just 'here'.)

    Your brain has no ability to add thing that exist at certain unoccupied points in space and keep up with them as you move around and look at them from different directions. There simply is no possible brain mechanism to do that. It would requite you running your visual cortex backwards or something.

    OTOH, you could be so screwed up you couldn't actually tell that said objects weren't occupying space correctly, but that would require such a high level of 'broken brain' that it would be fairly obvious if witnesses to ball lightning were that.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  66. My ball lightning experience by phillipsfamily_01969 · · Score: 1

    This theory supports an incident that happened when I was still living at home. My family was gathered in the living room and kitchen when lightning must have struck our house (or close by). We each saw ball lightning appear before us at varying distances, but always in whatever direction each of us was looking. We weren't seeing the same instance of the phenomenon. Mine appeared about 20 ft away and moved a short distance before disappearing. My mom's appeared outside the window she was facing.

  67. Re:So the field emulates binocular depth? Bullcrap by sjames · · Score: 1

    That would all strongly depend on where in the cortex the stimulation happens. If you consider that it takes the raw input of the optic nerves and integrates it all into your visual perception of the world, there must be a point far enough up the chain where it will appear to have depth (after the point where the two separate visual fields are integrated) for example. Your eyes make small movements all the time that don't show up in your perception of the world. At some point, the cortex manages all of that, so a stimulation above that point won't necessarily follow your eye movements.

    This only works for some people, but could be enlightening. Look directly ahead for a moment. Without moving your head or eyes, cover your right eye. Now shift your gaze to the far right, far left, far right, and back to directly ahead. pay attention to the right peripheral of your field of view. You will see the image there distinctly at first, then darkening and breaking up. You saw it because your visual cortex expected to be able to see there and it had data for that area. It faded and broke up as real input from your covered eye (darkness) conflicted with the conscious constructed image.

  68. Gibson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this time I thought it was caused by Braveheart lifting his quilt!

  69. Well, the ball of plasma I saw by Jerry · · Score: 1

    popped out of a wall socket in my living room when a lighting bolt struck a pole near the corner of my house. The power cord to a Thomas clock plugged into that socket melted. The ball had the size of a soccer ball and the color of a basketball, except that it was iridescent. It floated across the living room a distance of about 12 feet, gradually settling down and touching the carpet, where it disappeared in a flash and left a burned patch about three inches in diameter. This was the first and only plasma ball (ball lightening?) I ever saw.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  70. Re:idea != fact, and walking blinded by the light by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Ball Lightening Caused by Magnetic Hallucinations

    It's clearly a bogus theory. In my experience, ball lightening is usually caused by filling it up with helium.

    I'd thought that Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xeon, and Radon is used in a Geissler device (whether globular or tubular, in shape) rather than Helium?

    If we can perceive lighting directly by magnetic-stimulation of the brain, rather than through perceiving reflected illumination from surrounding objects . . . . . well, that just means we're going to be bumping into all those objects that don't moderate the magnetic-stimulation in any way at all!?!?

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  71. Explanation of "UFO" sightings, but not EBEs by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this explains the "UFO" sightings by aviation crew and some astronauts? I would suspect that as one increases their altitude, they increase their odds of experiencing such an occurrence: with a statistical spike as one approaches/escapes the earth's atmosphere. As such this could even cause a "mass hallucination".

    . . .

    But that doesn't explain, in any way at all, the Nordic-type EBEs looking back through the portholes, and miming: "Please stop exploding those nasty, contaminating, nuclear devices on your planet! They are affecting our transmission of Magnetic Hallucinations direct to your cranial stimulus centers, and blocking our essential message!"

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"