Slashdot Mirror


Craigslist Removes Its Controversial Adult Section

Cyrus writes "The online classified website Craigslist has removed its controversial Adult Services portion of its website. Technology blog TechCrunch was the first to report the section had been blacked out with the word 'Censored.'"

522 comments

  1. oh darn by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    now all the prostitutes will post in casual encounters

    1. Re:oh darn by odies · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And what's wrong with prostitution anyway? In the end all girls cost money, many times much more than if you just get to the point right away. I'm in Thailand currently and it's all very casual - you go to a bar or gogo bar (not clubs), girls come to talk with you and you order them a few drinks and maybe play a round of billiard and just have good time. If you want to, you can take them to the nearest hotel or take them to your hotel with you for a night. Girls don't mind and sometimes they might even end up dating with you (happens easily as western guys are considered a huge score for a girl here).

      In the end its nothing else than again some religious or "I define what people should be allowed to do!" persons trying to limit the fun people can have. If the girl herself wants to do it, there's no "victims". Hell, there are girls who love having a lot of sex and it's even better for them because they get paid for what they love. Other people really have to start living their own lives and stop thinking "I don't do this, so no one else can do it either!".

    2. Re:oh darn by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree completely and have nothing against prostitution, it's just that this will clog up the casual encounters section for people that aren't looking to pay money for sex. That's why it made much more sense to have a separate section for it.

    3. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the girl herself wants to do it, there's no "victims".

      Oh, that old argument.

      Look, there are many good arguments for the legalisation of prostitution per se (even for minors, although the person paying for services would then likely be breaking some statutory rape law).

      But it's without foundation to bring up the "lots of women want to do it" argument. And "want to do it", whatever the tedious capitalist he-may-be-interned-in-a-factory-but-at-least-he's-not-dying-in-the-fields armchair philosophers will tell you, must not be confused with "is desperate for money and willing to do it because there is no viable alternative". I have not read any evidence that a majority of prostitutes work because they enjoy being prostitutes. Have you?

      Stop being a "prostitution is no initiation of force therefore it should be legal therefore it is OK" libertard and instead ask "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?" Don't use the exception of the $xE6/year professional dominatrix with a fancy web site living in Hollywood and servicing the stars. Consider the average prostitute.

    4. Re:oh darn by iamacat · · Score: 1

      And all of them really don't mind 1 in 5 chance of getting AIDS even if we disregard other aspects of the job? Not saying it should be completely illegal, just that prostitution will become much more rare and expensive if we get serious about combatting criminal, health and educational issues. Maybe so much so you will consider regular dating again.

    5. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

      I have not read any evidence that a majority of prostitutes^Wfast-food workers work because they enjoy being prostitutes^Wfast-food workers. Have you?

    6. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could always work at mcdonalds. but they choose to do that instead.

      so yeah, it's their choice. there are other jobs, they just don't pay as well. By your logic, nobody would ever do any job, because who really *wants* to haul trash, or clean up shit, or say, "would you like fries with that" 100 times an hour?

    7. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeeeeahhh, um, Bob, I think we're going to need to see a citation for that. In what area where prostitution is legal and regulated do prostitutes have a 1 in 5 chance of getting AIDS?

    8. Re:oh darn by odies · · Score: 0, Redundant

      instead ask "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      Why wouldn't it be moral? What is immoral about sex? Yes, if you follow bible then you might think it's immoral to have pre-marital sex, but the world is a different place now a day. Most people, at least young, understand that you can have sex just for the pleasure and fun time it gives. And like the other poster noted, a lot of people don't like other kind of shitty jobs either. Should we make flipping burgers or cleaning services illegal too?

    9. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already do.

    10. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've read through your post 3 or 4 times to try to work out what point you're trying to make. Possibly:

      1. The initial hypothesis was that people may be prostitutes because they enjoy it, perhaps a specific case of the general "all jobs are voluntary so people surely do them because they enjoy them" nonsense. You've given another example of a job which people don't necessarily do because they enjoy, so I guess you're attempting to provide evidence against that hypothesis.
      2. Fast-food work is as physically dangerous, emotionally debilitating,
        unregulated, lacking in any benefits, controlled by highly abusive bosses and as associated with severe social stigma as prostitution.
      3. Fast-food workers across the world are typically as desperate for money as prostitutes.
    11. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've managed to misread my post in so many ways that you may be trolling. Let me break it down like I did to the "other poster":

      1. There was no argument made that sex is immoral. Sex is not the same as paying prostitutes.
      2. There was no argument made that prostitution should be illegal. I pointed out that there are good arguments to make prostitution entirely legal.
      3. Morality and legality are not the same thing. Even insane chain-smoking cult leader Ayn Rand understood this.
    12. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the point was, that people do all kinds of things when they are desperate for money, and they aren't illegal. so why single out prostitution as being somehow worse than the other ones? whether or not they *want* to, they are *willing* to in order to make a lot of money in a very short period of time.

    13. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        And I suppose everyone else works just for the fun of it? There may be any honor in it, but like it or not it's how some people choose to make a living.

    14. Re:oh darn by fredmosby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When people were working in factories under horrible conditions for little pay they didn't solve the problem by making working in factories illegal, the workers unionized and the government passed minimum wage and safety laws. If we banned all the jobs that people only do for money there wouldn't be very many legal jobs.

    15. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I once hired an escort in Arizona, average price, so nothing special. She was very friendly and happy to talk to me. She said she made about 200k a year doing this, had two houses, and could afford to co-rent an apartment for incalls. 200k doesn't sound like a lot but the cost of living in AZ is pretty low. While I'm sure that isn't the norm, and streetwalkers and drug users definitely fit your description, a significant part of prostitution is because it pays better than the alternative (at least the entire escort business).

    16. Re:oh darn by migla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're kind of right. Being able to hire people who need the money to do a shitty job is exploitation. But there's a big difference in being fucked by the exploiter figuratively and literally. Sex is intimate and can screw with you worse than the boredom and aching feet (or whatever) that flipping burgers entails. There are similarites between prostitution and other kinds of "wage slavery", but the two are generally in different leagues of fuckeduppedness.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    17. Re:oh darn by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

          Have you talked to many escorts to come to this conclusion? It really doesn't sound like it.

          Have you talked to your average worker in a fast food restaurant or big box store? Unless they're just out of high school, they're miserable.

          Stop forcing YOUR morality on others. It's a choice, both by the service provider, and by the customer. One way or another, we're all in the same business. We want something, and we give something for it. So your morality may say that you need to spend money on fancy dinners and expensive trinkets, coming to a climax where a lavish party is thrown because you put a multi-carat diamond on some poor girls finger. It's all down hill from there. Will you cheat on her? Will she divorce you and take half of what you have?

          Prostitution, under it's various names, is far more honest. You negotiate the fee for services rendered, and then you each get what you wanted. Simple. The same concerns apply in the interaction with her, or a girl you met elsewhere. Wear a condom, and keep track of your wallet.

          They made the choice to go into the industry. Their customers made the choice to get services from the industry. It's simple. I've known a few women who work in the industry, and they refuse the option of taking a "normal" job, for a fraction of the pay and losing flexibility with their life. Those of us who work in an office don't get the choice of saying "I have a headache, I don't want to work today", or "I have other things to do, pay me for Saturday night instead." None of them were forced to do it. Very few look back at a "regular" job with any sort of passion for it.

          I won't say that there aren't bad elements in the industry, but if you look at how many corporations work you'll see worse behavior. You have overworked, underpaid disgruntled people wondering if they have a job tomorrow. Will I get fired? Will the company be downsizing? Will the company fold? I've seen a lot of good hard working 9 to 5 people suddenly find themselves without an income, because they came into work, just to find that they didn't have a job any more. Maybe you're independently wealthy, and don't have to worry about such things, but for the rest of the world, we have bills to pay.

          Because of people like you, who have forced your morality on others, it's put these working women in danger. Legalization and acceptance of the industry is the only way to remove the bad elements of the industry.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    18. Re:oh darn by dissy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But it's without foundation to bring up the "lots of women want to do it" argument. And "want to do it", whatever the tedious capitalist he-may-be-interned-in-a-factory-but-at-least-he's-not-dying-in-the-fields armchair philosophers will tell you, must not be confused with "is desperate for money and willing to do it because there is no viable alternative".

      So instead of a situation of a desperate woman being a prostitute to pay the bills, you instead would rather that desperate woman be a prostitute to pay the bills AND be a criminal.
      That's rather nice of you :/

      Look, we both know the problem is desperation, and that is what needs to be solved.
      Clearly neither of us have that solution, nor do the women doing this.

      Why make them criminals just because they are already in a fucked up situation?
      Because outlawing something does not stop it, especially when you are that desperate already.

      If it was simply taxed and regulated like any other legal job, we wouldn't have any of the Other problems we get today with prostitution, and will be making the exact same dent in the desperation problem as now (read None)

      Then a lot of those desperate women will not be criminals as well, and might have a better chance of improving their situation without a police record to follow them forever.

      Right now it's very hard to help improve any of those peoples lives, as with a criminal record they can't easily do quite a lot of things we take for granted, such as getting a job.

      Remove that one little barrier and it becomes that much easier to provide some real help.

    19. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just go ahead and start quoting Bible verses? You know you want to, and that's basically what your argument has boiled down to.

    20. Re:oh darn by BudAaron · · Score: 1

      ROTFLMAO - they already do and have for a long time. The worlds oldest profession WILL find a way even though they get flagged.

    21. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It'll be interesting to see you justify a single assertion in that post without resorting to religious arguments, or without projecting your own personal moral hangups on the rest of humanity as a whole.

      The truth is, prostitution is not a particularly dangerous job when it's kept above-board and regulated by health authorities. This move on Craigslist;s part will instead drive the trade farther underground than it already was.

    22. Re:oh darn by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So your morality may say that you need to spend money on fancy dinners and expensive trinkets, coming to a climax where a lavish party is thrown because you put a multi-carat diamond on some poor girls finger. It's all down hill from there. Will you cheat on her? Will she divorce you and take half of what you have?

      Of course, some people mature from their early 20s sex-insanity, realize that sex isn't everything, and then actually love the person they get married to, and have a nice life after that. Not everything in life is a direct result of sex.

      This really should be obvious on Slashdot, where half of us would rather code than have sex :)

      --
      Qxe4
    23. Re:oh darn by UCSCTek · · Score: 1

      Regulated prostitution is far safer than black market prostitution, for both parties, so you are really arguing for legalization...

    24. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are begging the question.

      It seems you have an outmoded morality that sees sex as something dirty, or wrong (I'm guessing you're a Christian?), and that paid for sex is even more wrong.

      Please join us in 2010. Sex between consenting adults is normal, common, and there is nothing immoral or wrong about it.

      Plenty or people, men and women, have absolutely no hang ups about sex. Just because you do, doesn't mean that sex work is wrong.

      I actually have known some sex workers. One was my neighbour. She had no problems with sex work, and no hang ups about it. Of course, I come from New Zealand where we legalised sex work a few years back.

      So I guess I have considered "the average prostitute", because I know some of them. They're normal people, just like you or me. They just have a different job.

    25. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about this simple argument: if person A wants to fuck person B, and person B wants to pay them to do it, who the fuck are you to tell them that they're not allowed to?

    26. Re:oh darn by Klinky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fastfood work can be just as mentally straining & bad for your body, especially if you're eating where you work because it's cheaper due to your employee discount than fixing food for yourself. If you have anyone else to support or you have flaky hours, you might need another job. Combine the physical nature of the job, the unhealthy environment & food then the mental stress of incompetent or power tripping management, aggressive and selfish customers, anxiety over working so hard yet not having enough money to pay for basic needs & the stigma attached to being a fast-food worker, I could see how it's not a lot better than being a prostitute.

      Ultimately it does take a certain mindset to be a prostitute & not all prostitution is equal. Turning tricks under a bridge for $20 so you can go feed your addiction is not the same as someone earning $200 or $300 per visit & does not have an addiction. Also on the outside people will have no clue you're a prostitute, unless you're outed somehow. People will know you work in fast-food and that some how makes you a loser so will be nasty to you while you man the register or they'll heckle you while you're standing at the bus stop after your shift.

      In conclusion neither job is healthy.

    27. Re:oh darn by beakerMeep · · Score: 1

      That's not really fair - economic pressure is only one of many coercive elements that could be driving someone to prostitution. Some could be slaves/indentured servants from a foreign country, some probably have language barriers etc. I think the GP's point was that there isn't any evidence proving one way or another how voluntary the 'employment' is. While you have a point, maybe a closer analogy would be undocumented migrant workers. The dizzying intellect thing was kinda over the top.

      --
      meep
    28. Re:oh darn by UCSCTek · · Score: 1

      But it's without foundation to bring up the "lots of women want to do it" argument.

      He didn't say anything about how many woman want to do it, just that there are obviously some. Don't argue against something no one is trying to defend. It's a valid point that, for every woman who would like this avenue of work, legalization would be helping someone.

      Regardless, in the case of people who are prostituting themselves to make ends meet, without "choice", it seems to me that legalization would be a better scenario, since the working conditions (medical checkups, personal security) would be improved.

    29. Re:oh darn by pitchpipe · · Score: 2, Informative

      But it's without foundation to bring up the "lots of women want to do it" argument. And "want to do it", whatever the tedious capitalist he-may-be-interned-in-a-factory-but-at-least-he's-not-dying-in-the-fields armchair philosophers will tell you, must not be confused with "is desperate for money and willing to do it because there is no viable alternative".

      Why do you think that I go to my job everyday. Take call-outs in the middle of the fucking night when there is two feet of snow on the ground on Christmas (I work in an open pit mine)? It's the money, duh!

      I have not read any evidence that a majority of prostitutes work because they enjoy being prostitutes. Have you?

      I'm betting that you probably haven't researched it far enough to find out. After ten seconds with Google. Maybe not a majority, but there sure are a LOT of shit jobs out there that pay a lot less!

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    30. Re:oh darn by arivanov · · Score: 0, Troll

      You are obviously reading the "edition" of the bible compiled by puritans according to their own liking aka the King's James Version.

      Get the full one. The Inclusive Bible or one of the literal translations. You may change some of your opinions on what the bible considers moral or immoral after reading it.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    31. Re:oh darn by snowgirl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I speak from anecdotal evidence, so I know this does not apply to everyone in the field. There certainly are women who don't really want to do the job, and these people certainly deserve a path out of their professional field, but there are a number of people like that in almost all careers.

      You'd be surprised that it doesn't take a big stretch for a woman to get to the 6 figure mark, or at least what would be a 6 figure income if their pay is used as "take home", and we extrapolate what they would be earning if they were paying their proper taxes, etc.

      I know one particular former call girl who willingly and knowingly entered into the field of her own free will, and felt more honest about her earnings than when she was working as a computer programmer.

      Most people object to prostitution on two grounds: human trafficking, which should be wrong anyways, mistreatment by their pimps, or the dangers presented by clients. Most people who are against prostitution are not against the prostitutes themselves. They see them as "trapped" in a position where they have a high likelihood of harm. Yet, if we legalized it, then human trafficking would still be wrong, mistreatment by their pimps could be handled by police and other governmental authorities, and protection against clients is guaranteed the same way.

      In Sweden, prostitution is not illegal, but being a pimp and frequenting a prostitute are illegal. Imagine the wonderful nature of your transaction of: "if you stiff me, I can call the cops, and they'll arrest you, and I walk away." Clients won't screw their prostitutes in this case. The same with pimps. "Go ahead, slap me... I'll call the cops, and they'll haul you away, and I can admit openly that I'm a prostitute, and I won't get taken away."

      How about making prostitution a SAFE profession, rather than demanding it be illegal to stop people from doing it? If you're concerned about their health from the sex alone, either physical and/or mental, then when shall we expect an intent to make promiscuity itself illegal?

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    32. Re:oh darn by Dhalka226 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stop being a "prostitution is no initiation of force therefore it should be legal therefore it is OK" libertard and instead ask "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      Gee, I wonder if you've made up your mind in advance at all? "Stop being a retard who disagrees with me and instead ask a question that I will only allow you to conclude the same as I do without being insulted!" Hey, thanks! If you think that position is wrong, then the onus is on you to explain why.

      If your hypothesis that most women are only prostitutes because they are desperate for money and there is no viable alternative is correct, then all you have done is criminalize what even you describe as their only choice to make money. At best, in your world, you stop them from doing the only thing they can do to survive. At worst they do it anyway and are criminals in addition to paupers, with all of the stigma and danger associated with any criminal activity. At least if it were legalized, there could be some protections in place both for the prostitutes and for the Johns. When "hope you don't get beaten and robbed" or "hope your pimp is a nice guy" are your only protections, there's something wrong.

      So, the six-figure-a-year celebrity hookers probably want to do it and they're making money hand-over-fist, so I don't see an argument to prevent it from that extreme. The opposite extreme (buying into your argument) is that the women don't really want to do it but have no other choice to survive, making legalizing it a slightly better alternative to a terrible situation that actually has very little to do with prostitution and more to do with hopeless economic conditions. Somewhere in the middle are women who aren't sexual millionaires but either want to do it, don't care either way or don't particularly want to do it and don't need to but consider it easier or faster money than the available alternatives. I'm seeing an entire spectrum where not a single data point would lead me to the conclusion that prostitution should be illegal.

      In fact, the only reason I can think of is the one supposed by your question: Imposing my set of morality on other people. My answer to your question about whether or not it is moral to pay for sex is "why the hell should I care?" If it doesn't involve me I don't find it to be any more my business than whether or not your wife or girlfriend (or boyfriend) is kinky in the sack. If it does, then I can exercise my own morality to my own actions and relations -- exactly as it should be. I wouldn't date a hooker, whether it was legal or not. I don't respect the behavior. It doesn't mean I need it to be criminal to prove my moral superiority.

      Now, legalizing prostitution isn't simple; it's something that would need to be done carefully to achieve any of the potential benefits and avoid a clusterfuck of potential problems. Very probably other laws would need to be created or changed. But all in all, if "I don't approve of what you're doing with your body" is the best I can come up with to stop you... fuck me. No pun intended.

    33. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slavery is already illegal, and should be.

      Illegal immigration is already, well, illegal, and there are various arguments either way on whether it should be.

      These are both entirely orthogonal to the question of whether prostitution should be legalized.

    34. Re:oh darn by Kitkoan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ask "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      How about asking "Is it moral for me to tell others how to live and what they can and cannot do?" What ever happened to freedom? Freedom of choice and to chose? Just because you don't approve of it doesn't magically make it wrong. Consider that some things you do are no doubt considered morally wrong to others.

      Yes, there have been cases of woman being abused/forced into prostitution, but if you look, every job has cases were people have been abused, with a much higher degree of these problems when the job/service is forced underground. Same thing happened during the prohibition, suddenly places that served alcohol had more problems/issues.

      As for prostitutes being happy with their job, there are reports that woman choose to do it, and are happy doing it. The only problems come up when people feel this burning urge to demonize them and their job choice. As for it being morally wrong, where do you get this opinion/information from? How is it morally wrong if both people are consenting adults that are quite happy and fine with the choice that they are making?

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    35. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you talked to many escorts to come to this conclusion? It really doesn't sound like it.

      The "escorts" you're probably thinking of are not representative of the global prostitution industry. I know this is /. and an awful lot of lonely men have paid $200+ for an escort and assume that "talking to an escort" (who you are paying to say what you want to hear) is somehow singular for "data", but it isn't.

      Stop forcing YOUR morality on others.

      Knee-jerk. Arguing that funding the prostitution industry may be immoral is not forcing anything.

      It's a choice, both by the service provider, and by the customer.

      All work is free choice to the extent that you also have the options to lie down on the streets and starve or jump off a cliff and die more quickly.

      So your morality may say that you need to spend money on fancy dinners and expensive trinkets, coming to a climax where a lavish party is thrown because you put a multi-carat diamond on some poor girls finger. It's all down hill from there. Will you cheat on her? Will she divorce you and take half of what you have?

      You are bitter and angry, and it's showing. Not that your bitterness and anger detract from the worth of your argument, but you're not presenting a decent argument anyway. Healthy human relationships are continually symbiotic, not about paying to seduce a woman and then crying because she doesn't give you what you want.

      Because of people like you, who have forced your morality on others, it's put these working women in danger. Legalization and acceptance of the industry is the only way to remove the bad elements of the industry.

      You're about the 5th poster to assume that I was arguing for the banning of prostitution, even though I started the argument by acknowledging that there are good arguments for legalisation and making clear that "moral" is not the same as "legal".

      Prostitution should be legal and well regulated. "Acceptance" is another matter. For example, let's say you're in an evil socialist European state and there's a job opening for a prostitute - should you lose unemployment benefits if you don't take the position? Geeks are so accepting of the scientific method except when it comes to studying humans themselves - in this particular case, no psychologist will argue that the effect of fucking 50 strangers a day is generally as benign as serving 50 burgers a day. But are you arguing that, and what is your extraordinary evidence?

    36. Re:oh darn by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Outlawing it, declaring war on it, having shitty prosecution numbers, and hiring more cops and corrections officers to deal with arresting and incarcerating the "offenders" makes a wonderful jobs bill.

      Also, many johns and drug buyers are now caught in asset forfeiture nets if they use a car, cell phone, or some other piece of easily seizable property to commit the illegal act. That helps pay for the extra cops and corrections officers.

    37. Re:oh darn by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      Yes, because not paying for prostitutes is theft of their services. Second, the real question is, "Should it be legal to engage in prostitution and pay for the services of the prostitution." That's clearly yes, since as has been pointed out before, there is no harm committed.

    38. Re:oh darn by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      Sure are a lot of people today defending why they pay for prostitutes! Why doesn't anyone just say, "I don't care about the welfare of the man/woman I'm fucking as long as I get my rocks off"? It would be far more honest than all these hand-wringing arguments about how women (always women...) are likely making a voluntary lucrative career choice.

      Two strangers meet. They have sex. One walks away $200 richer, the other $200 poorer. Who is the victim? The MAN? Because he's some fuckwad who can't get laid by any normal woman so he has to pay one to have sex with him?

      That just doesn't sound right.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    39. Re:oh darn by noidentity · · Score: 1

      If they had something better to earn money doing, they'd be doing that. So, if you prevent them from prostitution, they'll be doing something worse to earn money. That's better how?

    40. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      He didn't say anything about how many woman want to do it, just that there are obviously some.

      The context is an argument defending prostitution.

      If you say that you look at manga and my response points out that at least one person who looks at manga is a pedophile, I haven't actually stated that you a pedophile. But it's obvious what association I'm trying to convey. Otherwise, given that the literal assertion is almost inevitable, I wouldn't have said it.

    41. Re:oh darn by khallow · · Score: 1

      That's not really fair - economic pressure is only one of many coercive elements that could be driving someone to prostitution^Wfast-food work.

      I think I have this copy/paste rebuttal down. As Man On Pink Corner pointed out, coercing people to do anything be it prostitution or fast-food, is already illegal. You gain nothing (and actually lose something) by making the job itself illegal as well.

    42. Re:oh darn by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      enjoy that special sauce

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    43. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buried in your response was your real position. You're an extreme-right conservative, supports pedophilia, and haven't grasped "run-on sentences".

    44. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      How about asking "Is it moral for me to tell others how to live and what they can and cannot do?"

      Is it moral for me to tell you that you should (I didn't argue for banning anything) not kill humans? Not kill animals? Steal? Copy software? Lie? Cut someone off? Drink and drive?

      This thread is full of people confusing legality and morality. This is the mistake the religious right make. Given that geeks can be just as dogmatic, I guess I shouldn't be surprised to see that here too.

    45. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Why do you think that I go to my job everyday. Take call-outs in the middle of the fucking night when there is two feet of snow on the ground on Christmas (I work in an open pit mine)? It's the money, duh!

      So how's the lack of regulation, lack of benefits, share of physically abusive bosses and clients, nasty disease and repeatedly proven risk of psychological trauma playing out? What's it like having no CV to give you a degree of freedom to find something better?

      Congratulations, you do a physically demanding and risky job. So did a certain relation, and he did it for good money too. He's now bedbound. It may be related - the gaggle of doctors haven't made up their mind even decades later. As I understand it, worker conditions have improved since he did that job, because we didn't have idiots saying, "It's a free exchange!" Instead, it was understood that it was immoral to expect people to work like that. It might not be as lucrative a job any more (for those who succeed), but such is the price of reducing the chance that the non-perfectly-free-informed-and-rational destroy themselves.

      After ten seconds with Google. [dearcupid.org] Maybe not a majority

      This is as bad as linking to Yahoo Answers as a substitute for a scientific report. What is wrong with /.?

    46. Re:oh darn by jcr · · Score: 1

      I have not read any evidence that a majority of prostitutes work because they enjoy being prostitutes.

      So what? If they do it voluntarily, it's nobody's business but theirs and their customers'. The problems associated with prostitution are a consequence of trying to prohibit it, just like the War on Drugs.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    47. Re:oh darn by PietjeJantje · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is an urban legend that these women have no other options than prostitution. At most locations, this is false, they have. The other options don't pay as well though. These girls prefer relatively well-paid prostitution over working 10 hour shifts at a factory or selling food stuff on markets. If there are no other options, all the ugly girls and lowly educated men would die of starvation. Yes they are exploited, but how did they get there? All the high-profile stories about human trafficking and prostitution slavery, in the end it's only a small minority.

    48. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the prostitutes I've known have done it "out of desperation". They money are good. Really good. They had jobs and could pay their bills nicely, they just wanted a new Gucci handbag or something similar

    49. Re:oh darn by makomk · · Score: 1

      But it's without foundation to bring up the "lots of women want to do it" argument. And "want to do it", whatever the tedious capitalist he-may-be-interned-in-a-factory-but-at-least-he's-not-dying-in-the-fields armchair philosophers will tell you, must not be confused with "is desperate for money and willing to do it because there is no viable alternative".

      Actually, you know who have fairly consistently supported legalising prostitution over here in the UK? Anti-capitalist feminists. It's worth thinking a bit about why, and just what the argument you're making actually entails.

      Sure, in an ideal world sex workers probably wouldn't want to do it. For the most part, though, they've decided that it's better than the alternatives. What you and the other people battling to make prostitution impossible are doing is forcing the workers into alternatives that they've decided are worse just because you think they'd be better off that way, since what they're doing is immoral in your eyes. If it was really about women being "forced" into prostitution due to no viable alternatives, the solution is to provide those alternatives, not to take away their only viable option.

      What's more, think about what the obvious alternatives are: working much longer hours in Wal-mart or MacDonalds or another big company. All of those alternatives are much more directly controlled by the capital-owning class and benefit them much more directly than independent prostitution. You can set up as an independent prostitute with relatively little capital, whereas starting your own store or other conventional business requires much more - and starting one big enough not to be driven out of business by competition from the megacorporations requires way more. (Notice the "independent" part. Brothels are a different matter - and note that most states which legalised prostitution have only done so for brothels, probably because they do benefit capital owners.)

    50. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      The problems associated with prostitution are a consequence of trying to prohibit it

      Why don't you take a moment to study a handful of societies, ancient, recent and current, which have legalised prostitution and/or drugs? Get back to me on whether the "problems associated with" drugs and prostitution have all magically disappeared.

      The war on drugs and prostitution has made some of the problems associated with drugs and prostitution worse. It has also introduced new problems. It cannot be concluded from this that there are no problems with the recreational drug and prostitution industries which exist independently of their legal status.

      For example, that man may uncaringly exploits his fellow man for enjoyment and considers that any act is moral providing he doesn't have to put a gun to someone's head is an obvious problem which has been illustrated in this thread. And that's just putting one issue in the most abstract terms to illustrate the desperate rationalisation of the angry johns.

    51. Re:oh darn by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Informative
      • It's not always women
      • You're being morally presumptuous, basically saying you want to decide whether they should work as prostitutes based on whether you think it's wrong

      I'm not commenting on whether I think it's right (I'd sure never consider it a career option), but I don't think it's right to decide for other people.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    52. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If there are no other options, all the ugly girls and lowly educated men would die of starvation.

      (1) Prostitutes aren't necessarily "pretty" - don't get your ideas on the sex industry from Western porn sites;
      (2) Men have far more employment opportunities. Most societies still overtly discriminate against women, sometimes because they're physically weaker and sometimes just because.

      . Yes they are exploited, but how did they get there?

      Are they OK now? Just because some uneducated kid is fooled into thinking that prostitution is a lucrative way out of poverty it doesn't mean you get to judge them any differently when they're physically and emotionally broken a year later.

    53. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even think one would usually have to be desperate to get into prostitution if the government didn't harass prostitutes this much, and turned a blind eye to providing social and other security.

      Yes, they sell sex - so what? That job in itself is probably far less traumatic than being in the army in a war and less destructive on a human body than some construction work. Surely it also has some perks other jobs don't have, like tips and some of your customers taking you out for dinner or what not. Its a job...

    54. Re:oh darn by makomk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people object to prostitution on two grounds: human trafficking, which should be wrong anyways, mistreatment by their pimps, or the dangers presented by clients. Most people who are against prostitution are not against the prostitutes themselves.

      Nope. Sure, they like to argue that they are, but if you actually pay attention to what they're saying they think all prostitution should be destroyed to "stop trafficking and are pushing for laws that make their lives more dangerous.

      For example, here in the UK the anti-trafficking groups pushed for a law criminalising sex with women who were "controlled for gain". Sounds good, right? Except it means no more agencies to screen out harassing calls, and no more working with a maid or other person who can call the police if the client gets violent because many clients will wonder if they could be a pimp and they might go to jail. (It was a strict-liability offence - didn't matter if there was no way you could know the women you were paying for sex with was "controlled for gain".) These groups went to a lot of effort to keep actual sex workers from pointing this out to the Government.

      Or think about what exactly the Swedish law means. It means that most guys who have respect for the law won't visit prostitutes. It also means that anyone that does will be on the lookout for a police sting, so forget record-keeping or requiring real phone numbers or having someone else in the flat as a witness. It's the exact opposite of making prostitution a safe profession.

      (Oh, and Sweden's only legalised prostition if you're in the country legally and have the right to work. Anyone who isn't gets a prison sentence and forcible repatriation, which in some cases means their country of origin will then confiscate their passport. Of course, this doesn't apply if they were illegally trafficked, and the police are sure to tell the women that they know they must be victims of sex trafficking and that if they just give a statement saying so they can leave prison. Net result? Traffickers are reluctant to traffic women into Sweden... unless they know they'll be kept as slaves and can never reach the sex industry.)

    55. Re:oh darn by Kilrah_il · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My opinion is that the concept of prostitution is not bad. A woman (or man) that chooses to go this way as a job is free to do it. Some of them prefer it to work at McDonald's. I know law students that work at prostitution because it's a very high-paying job and the hours are flexible. The problem starts when the prostitutes are not doing it out of their own free will. Many of them are exploited and most of the money is taken by pimps who leave them with petty cash* or hook them on drugs to keep them working. Sadly, many of the prostitutes today (especially those on the streets) are the exploited type (Sorry, no citation).
      The solution is not to stop prostitution or to make it illegal. I think prostitution should be legal. It's just that law enforcement agencies should spend their time stopping the exploitation, and not the act itself.

      * Someone is sure to come with the example that my boss also takes the lion's share of what I bring to the company, but at least I am free to quit my job (and many of those prostitutes are not) and he doesn't keep me working by making me a drug user (Although a case can be made for the coffee machine).

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    56. Re:oh darn by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Is it more moral to let the woman starve? If they have no choice except prostitution, then if they can't prostitute themselves they can just die?

    57. Re:oh darn by jcr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why don't you take a moment to study a handful of societies

      Why don't you take a brief hiatus from being a pompous, moralizing prick, and absorb the fact that I am far more familiar than you are with world history, and that's why I understand the futility of trying to legislate away anything that you don't like.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    58. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't use the exception of the $xE6/year professional dominatrix with a fancy web site living in Hollywood and servicing the stars. Consider the average prostitute.

      But if the amount paid factors in, then this isn't really about morals, is it?

    59. Re:oh darn by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Stop being a "prostitution is no initiation of force therefore it should be legal therefore it is OK" libertard and instead ask "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      The proper question would be: "Does making it illegal improve their and everybody else's life?", arguing from morals is something that should belongs into a church, not into law making.

    60. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Why don't you take a brief hiatus from being a pompous, moralizing prick, and absorb the fact that I am far more familiar than you are with world history, and that's why I understand the futility of trying to legislate away anything that you don't like.

      Maybe you have a strong background in world history. Since you've asserted that you are "more familiar than" I am with the subject, you should at least back up your fallacious argument by auto-authority with some links to your publications. It won't change the strength of your argument but at least it will confirm that you're not asserting irrelevant falsehoods.

      However, I question your assertion in the light of your failure at basic reading comprehension. My original post did not advocate legislating against prostitution. Further posts repeated this position. The post you've just replied to makes it clear that I believe legislating against prostitution (and drugs) just makes problems worse.

      You've erected a straw windmill, mounted your hobby horse and cried, "Charge!" You would not look out of place in a forum on the Internet.

    61. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it could fuck with you. However I am happy to fuck with most women, why shouldn't women feel the same?
      Women do enjoy sex and get as much out of it as men if not more.

      A prostitute is able to pick and choose her clients, even with you willing to pay her it still might not be enough.

           

    62. Re:oh darn by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would never pay for sex. Hell, I'd never even go in a strip club, I consider it degrading for both the stripper and the patron. (Hint - guys, she's DOESN'T like you.)

      But I also have a problem with the government saying when and why two consenting adults can have sex.

      Of course though, exploitation of women is rampant, and the situation is pretty grim except in some places perhaps where there's serious regulation, mandatory health screening, benefits and crap.

      Possible solution - don't tell a woman (or man for that matter) they can't ask for money (instead of a dinner, some coke, or "let me crash here for a few days") in exchange for sex, because why someone chooses to have sex isn't the government's business... but

      outlaw PIMPING. Or, because prohibition doesn't usually work well, make it legal but regulate the living fuck out of it.

      I mean, prostitution is illegal - so when pointing to the problem of prostitution and how horrible it is, it really doesn't necessarily follow that the solution is to make it illegal - it already is. Must not be working?

      --
      This space available.
    63. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      But if the amount paid factors in, then this isn't really about morals, is it?

      That's absurd. If you're well-protected, well-compensated and free from physical and (N.B.) psychological harm and destitution both within the job and if you choose to leave it, then there's not so much of a problem.

      The problem is that all the above luxuries aren't enjoyed by the average prostitute.

      (There's still the question of whether you enjoy the job or you feel you're draining away half your waking time. That's not an issue specific to prostitution.)

    64. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm suggesting that people should think about the moral implications of paying for a prostitute.

      Why don't you tell us what you think the moral implications are, rather than assuming (incorrectly, if this thread is any indication) that they're the same for anyone else as they are for you? Muster some courage and state what you believe, and then defend it if you can.

      I'm not judging those who become prostitutes.

      Perhaps not, but it certainly sounds as though you're judging their patrons.

    65. Re:oh darn by quietlikeachurch · · Score: 1

      She's a friend of a friend, and comes over every night around 12:30 (well, AM...). Hell, she's asleep in my bed right now, poor soul! I'm on Slashdot (afterglow?)! If she wants to set up a payment system I might not be averse...

      --
      "One day you will be able to hurt your smart phone's feelings." - Mahhshall
    66. Re:oh darn by xtracto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's one reason why some people call prostitution the oldest profession...

      I think the main reason why prostitutes exist is because there is demand for it. And I believe there will always be.

      The fact that in today's society it is "morally incorrect" to sell sexual services is just a temporary (in the hundreds of years span) thing.

      But even if government would be able to ban all prostitution the only thing that would happen is that the service would become more expensive, and the people who provide the service would have less rights.

      However, if prostitution was completely legal, open and accepted then it will only be a matter of calling a private number and safely providing/consuming those service at home.

      The fact that some people choose to be prostitutes is because it gives them a certain amount of income for another certain amount of work. Sure, those same persons may be able to change their jobs but that would mean doing more work for less payment.

      BTW, I remembered an interview a guy in Mexico made to 2 "male prostitutes" (Gigolos) from Mexico City. The two guys were professionals, one of them was a doctor. When asked why did they decide to prostitute they answered that it was because they earned a high salary doing this job whereas doing their day job was not profitable enough *for their lifestyle*

       

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    67. Re:oh darn by xtracto · · Score: 2, Funny

      " Clients won't screw their prostitutes in this case
      Bah... then what do Swedish people do with the prostitutes? do they play charades?

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    68. Re:oh darn by xtracto · · Score: 1

      "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      Howdy crap, I didn't know mother Teresa posted on slashdot.

      Welcome!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    69. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We've posted to casual encounters a dozen times over the past couple of years. The vast majority of replies are obvious fakes, and this is only going to make it worse. The remaining weren't good matches for one reason or another (we don't find them attractive, or they live way far away). Swinger sites are MUCH more reliable.

      Related side story: we turned down one couple that responded on Craigslist after swapping g-rated pictures with them (my wife didn't find him particularly attractive). That night we went to a swingers party for New Years, and you don't get three guesses to figure out who showed up. Turns out they were a strange couple... she stayed parked on the couch all night long while her husband had some fun. She may have been broke (on her period). I don't recall for sure. But I do recall her sucking most of the energy out of that corner of the hotel room. It didn't seem like she wanted to be there.

    70. Re:oh darn by Kilrah_il · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about you, but many times that I have sex with a "normal woman" I become somewhat poorer (although usually not 200$). I do admit that the one getting richer is the restaurant/bar and not the woman, so who is the victim here?

      P.S. In a magazine in my country they once did a comparison of the price of getting laid between a hooker, one-night stand, steady girlfriend and wife. As you can guess, the hooker and the one-night stand were the cheapest.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    71. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you and fuck your desert death cult god.

    72. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It depends greatly on the country too. Here in Italy, an extremely high percentage of prostitutes are essentially Russian women who are slaves to crime organizations.

      However, if it were above-ground and regulated, there wouldn't really be that problem...

    73. Re:oh darn by jewishbaconzombies · · Score: 1

      Taking the sex out of it, I wonder what's the difference between buying a woman drinks at a bar, or hiring a social consort (for chat only) in Japan? The obvious answer is you could get the woman in the bar drunk and get lucky, but what if you just want a conversation outside of the screen? I'd gladly pay for good conversation any day vs., expensive drunk dialogue with an amateur.

    74. Re:oh darn by jewishbaconzombies · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's plenty of other sites. Backpage.com is just one of many that comes to mind. Is Facebook is another.

    75. Re:oh darn by rednip · · Score: 1

      This move on Craigslist;s part will instead drive the trade farther underground than it already was.

      It's not as if Craigslist did anything to make it 'more open' or safer, the worse that could happen is that they'll use some other site to connect to 'clients'.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    76. Re:oh darn by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      I agree...

      but there is a dark side to all of this.

      Society will just become this evil place where women simply say "pay me" if you want to fuck. Love will be gone. It will all boil down to a business transaction. Which has already happened to real business unfortunately...

      So the fear would be taking the humanity out of everything... and turning life into some contractual money exchange between every person without regard at all for feelings or human decency.

      But since no one actually cares about anyone else anymore...

      might as well spiral down the toilet in a blaze of glory.

    77. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people had sex for money of their own free will, that would be acceptable. In reality many prostitutes are forced to do it. If you think the sex business is all peachy in Thailand, you're deluding yourself and others. These girls do not "date" you. They are still "on the clock". If it weren't for the pay, they would not hang out in bars and let strangers take them to hotels to have sex with them. The overpriced drinks are the payments to their pimps. Human trafficking is a serious problem with prostitution and so is the exploitation of underprivileged women.

    78. Re:oh darn by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here in Italy, an extremely high percentage of prostitutes are essentially Russian women who are slaves to crime organizations.

      And that's just Berlusconi's women!

    79. Re:oh darn by ian_from_brisbane · · Score: 0

      You mean from the woman or the fast-food worker?

    80. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but many times that I have sex with a "normal woman" I become somewhat poorer (although usually not 200$)

      Every time I've had sex, it's been a progression of a friendship into a kissy relationship into a fully sexual relationship. I've never targeted anyone - certainly not by buying anything. I've never counted up how much I've spent in some way benefitting that person up to the point I first had sex with them. I've not considered having sex a goal, or the end of anything. It just happens. It's nice but it's not essential.

      It's weird to see so many people here talk of sex as the result of an investment. Perhaps well regulated prostitutes would be the moral option for them if it were established that the prostitutes were physically and mentally healthy and had full freedom of choice. Or perhaps they need a fuck buddy. Or friends who will take a tenner and give you a BJ. I'm not sure.

    81. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lrn2read. I'm suggesting that people should think about the moral implications of paying for a prostitute.

      And how is that somehow worse than lying to someone / buying them several drinks?

    82. Re:oh darn by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      You do understand that my post was just a humoristic comment, don't you? Your comment is entirely correct and I agree with it wholeheartedly, but you are barking up the wrong tree. (Also, the above cited comparison was made as a joke - I believe there are many reasons to marry a woman, none of them relate to the cost/benefit ratio of sex).

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    83. Re:oh darn by JohnFluxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why doesn't anyone just say "I don't care about the welfare of the fast food work as long as I get my food"?

      I don't see why you keep singling out prostitution when your arguments apply to most jobs.

    84. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, that's definitely a shitty thing to do too. A symbiotic partnership, simple fuck buddy arrangement or even mutually honest one night stand seem far healthier.

      But enjoying physically and psychologically harmful working conditions day after day and believing (correctly or otherwise) that there's no way out is likely more harmful than hearing one lie about how pretty your eyes are. And johns ought to ask whether it's okay to pay to support that environment rather than playing the pseudo-libertarian "no physical force => legal => moral" card.

    85. Re:oh darn by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why don't you suggest that people should think about the moral implications of paying fast food workers to get them their food?

    86. Re:oh darn by houghi · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with prostitution anyway?

      And where do you draw the line? What about some trophy wives who do it for the money?

      Car analogy. If wives are like cars and you want to have one:
      Renting a car is illegal. You need to either lease or buy the car. Also you are not allowed to take the car for a ride before you bought it. If you are leasing complicated laws exist where in the end you are forced to buy the car for its new value plus the amount you already paid on lease. The moment you buy the car the value of all of your assets halves.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    87. Re:oh darn by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We could also ask porn sites to move to the .xxx TLD, ask spammers to mark their mails with "[SPAM]" and ask black hat hackers to set an evil bit in all their packets.
      The prostitutes will post where their posts will be read the most.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    88. Re:oh darn by noname444 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you saying that sex being more intimate than flipping burgers is a religious argument?

    89. Re:oh darn by Fusen · · Score: 1

      Where do you think your morals are from? I've read majority of the responses on this page and the only question I really come away wanting to know is how you think morals are formed.

    90. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, I was basically nodding my head in agreement (I also agree with your post about occasional student prostitute work vs regular street workers). I am genuinely puzzled by the quantity of people who view sex as a sneaky goal rather than an incidental enjoyment of a relationship, and then use this pathological viewpoint to argue, "At least paying for a prostitute is honest!"

      I can't get out of my head the image of a serial killer justifying himself with, "At least I only poisoned the suicidal!"

    91. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd. I wonder what would happen to my income if it was illegal for my customers to pay for my services.

    92. Re:oh darn by greyc · · Score: 1

      And "want to do it", whatever the tedious capitalist he-may-be-interned-in-a-factory-but-at-least-he's-not-dying-in-the-fields armchair philosophers will tell you, must not be confused with "is desperate for money and willing to do it because there is no viable alternative".

      Since you brought the "he-may-be-interned-in-a-factory-but-at-least-he's-not-dying-in-the-fields" argument up, it's safe to assume you've read/heard reasonable explanations of it, including why it works and how exactly the naive alternatives fail - so I won't repeat those here.
      I consider the aforementioned argument valid (and think it also applies to the situation depicted in your image). You have neither explained how/why it fails on theoretical grounds, nor provided specific empirical evidence for it failing in practice.
      A rejection this argument is a core part of the reasoning you outlined in your post, but I am aware of no effective rebuttals to it. If you have some, please provide them. Either original research or links to existing material are fine.

    93. Re:oh darn by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All the high-profile stories about human trafficking and prostitution slavery, in the end it's only a small minority.

      Small comfort if it's your daughter on the milk carton. I don't think we need to stamp out prostitution, but I do think we need to stamp out all forms of slavery. This country probably has relatively little slavery prostitution. Some nations, on the other hand, are known to be quite full of it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    94. Re:oh darn by ooshna · · Score: 1

      I have not read any reports hat most fastfood workers get beaten or raped as a by product of their job.

    95. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      Weird, I thought I'd replied to this one. Damn HTML 2.0.

      Anyway, I do, and I avoid going to major fast food joints where I believe they cause harm to their workers, to their suppliers and through harmful advertising to the dumb and the easily influenced. A responsible local business using carefully sourced food is far better for a community and for the worker.

      But fast food work, as has been pointed out in several posts in this thread, is not nearly as harmful an industry to the workers as prostitution. Indeed, there's way more dangerous menial labour (especially for "illegal" immigrants). And the discussion is about prostitution, not about all the other nasty things in life which people use to justify patronising a prostitute: "Because if my life is shitty, her life should be even shitter."

      No. Two wrongs are two things which need fixing.

    96. Re:oh darn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't equate prostitution with serving fast food. The former carries all sorts of risks, even when it's a licensed and regulated brothel. You think every customer is going to have a HIV and STD test first? Condoms are 100% effective? Sleeping with some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real date because you need the money has no psychological ramifications?

      Sure, there are high class places where conditions are better, but unless the girl happens to be pretty good looking and lucky enough to land that kind of job they are not going to deal with all that stuff. It is far far different to working in MacDonalds.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    97. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? To begin, the "dying in the fields" story is usually a canard, and it's often the case that conditions were not worse there until some large scale re-organisation of capital made it so in order to force people into the cities as workers.

      But industrial revolutions can ultimately increase the standard of living for future generations, which is why the initial stage of factory slave labour is usually justified.

      Since the sex trade does not advance the productivity of the country, there is no benefit to yourself or to future generations to being a de facto sex slave.

    98. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing personal, because generally your posts make a great deal of sense, but this one achieved two gold medals on the fallacy scale:

      Why don't you take a brief hiatus from being a pompous, moralizing prick

      ad hominem

      absorb the fact that I am far more familiar than you are with world history

      argumentum ad verecundiam, you expert, you.

      Put up or shut up. "Look, I don't need to explain myself, I'm an expert and you're a cretin" is below your usual standards. If you are an expert then we lurkers on the thread would like to hear your reasoning, expertly-drawn historical case studies included.

    99. Re:oh darn by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually I've known hookers and burger flippers (having actually lived in an apt building everyone called a "house of ill repute" due to the amount of hookers in it) and I'd have to say I felt MUCH sorrier for the burger flippers. The hookers had a nice place to work with good security, could refuse any patron that didn't want, and at the end of the week had plenty of money in their pockets after paying the bills.

      Contrast this with the burger flippers who were always in pain from the constant overwork, stank horribly (because you really can't get that stench out of your skin even after multiple baths), usually had burns from grease pops and looked awful from all the oil buildup, and most needed state assistance because of the incredibly shitty pay.

      So if you want the most abusive job, excluding pimps which are a product of prohibition, I'm gonna have to go with burger flipper. At least the hooker gets paid well for their job, whereas the burger flipper is lucky to be able to keep a roof over their head for MUCH longer hours and more hard physical labor.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    100. Re:oh darn by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      Small comfort if it's your daughter on the milk carton.

      But, but.. if we would be talking about my daughter being a prostitution slave, who exactly do you think sold her into slavery?

    101. Re:oh darn by migla · · Score: 1

      All I was saying was that exploiting peoples labor in order to enrich one self ("Kiss ass, won't you bitch, so you can get rich, but your boss gets richer off you", as Dead Kennedys puts it) is fucked up and exploiting them sexually is generally more fucked up.

      Sure it's a moral hangup if Karl Marx is the personification of one big moral hangup.

      I know prostitution can be much more lucrative and easier than flipping burgers. The world is fucked up in a way that makes people want money so badly that they'd sell their intimacy to fugly rich guys. Some emerge more, some less scathed. Some maybe unscathed. In general, I think this is fucked up, like the whole damn system is generally fucked up.

      If you see capitalism as non-exploitative, as an agreement between equals, then it will be easier to envision the happy prostitute, of course.

      Another, unrelated thing is that whores are often looked down upon, as if they're doing something wrong. That's fucked up as well. There sure is lots fuckeduppedness to go around.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    102. Re:oh darn by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      > A responsible local business using carefully sourced food is far better for a community and for the worker.

      Often small local businesses get their family members to work - especially the children. How is that better?

    103. Re:oh darn by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But, but.. if we would be talking about my daughter being a prostitution slave, who exactly do you think sold her into slavery?

      Kidnappings happen every day. Many of them are really railroadings, i.e. pick up a hitchhiker and she never appears again. A percentage of those girls are eviscerated or whatever and their remains are found spread around some forest someplace. The rest of them are locked up in a whorehouse somewhere. The chances of this happening to anyone individual seem vanishingly small, and they are slight enough to where I don't advocate staying home or anything, but the world is an inherently dangerous place.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    104. Re:oh darn by kainosnous · · Score: 1

      I think that I may disagree with you on every point here. First off, as far as morality is concerned, prostitution is wrong. Morality is not subjective. If that were the case, then it would be moral for me to kill people. It is objectively immoral for anybody to have sex with anybody who they are not married to, wether for pay or for fun.

      That being said, I don't think that something should be illegal just because it is wrong. If that were the case, then we should fine people for making stupid /. comments. Legality, at least in America, should be based on law and respect of the right to own, use, and trade property including your body. Some people are willing to degrade themselves and harm themselves for profit. I think that all of us would agree that it is wrong to hold a gun to somebody's head, but offering money makes it their choice. People should be legally allowed to make wrong and immoral choices in our society.

      Now that I'm done with that rant, I can point out that Craigslist is probably doing what it feels is best for their site. They probably don't care either way for the adult section and realise that it opens them up to liability that they don't want. If somebody wants an adult meeting site, build one. It's not that hard.

      --
      There are 10 commandments: 01)Thou shalt love the Lord Thy God 10)Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.Matt22:34-40
    105. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Craigslist had _nothing_ to do with legitimzing it or bringing it above board. Almost all of the prostitutes there were "illegal", because they work in states where it is outlawed. Craigslist made it easy for underfunded amateurs, without the experience or any elementary training or backup from a driver or a call-in number, to participate.

      I've personally known "adult workers", from the phone sex divorced mom with beutiful feet who did foot pictures and paid the car bills and food bills for her child during and after the divorce because her ex-husband had all the assets and took them for his kids with his new wife, who herself worked becauseshe had the degree my friend sacrificed to pay for her husband's graduate school, to the drug-addled and pimp-drug-supplied acquaintances of my high school days. My adult friend made a few harmless bucks, but she was careful and refused to do in person work. The youngsters were pretty universally abused by clients and pimps alike.

      So it varies, certainly, but I suggest you talk to the actual prostitutes. There's a large and incredibly seamy underside to the profession, rife not only with the illegality of prostitution itself but with police corruption, drug abuse, and physical risk to prostitute and their customers alike. Craigslist does not have the _staff_ and resources to police their subscriberes and assure anything like legitimacy: their costs are so low because of the self-advertising and lack of such staff, and corresponding lack of anything like a background check. The result was a morass of poor quality adult workers and real risk to both clients and advertisers, which played out in several murders.

      Now, all that said, I'm cureious why Craigslist marked it "censored". Did some court order step on their services?

    106. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think the main reason why slaves exist is because there is demand for it. And I believe there will always be.

      The fact that in today's society it is "morally incorrect" to sell slaves is just a temporary (in the hundreds of years span) thing.

      But even if government would be able to ban all slavery the only thing that would happen is that the service would become more expensive, and the people who provide the service would have less rights.

      Just sayin'.

      Humanity has a long and nasty history, and historical precedent does not necessarily suggest respectability. Leaving aside the question of whether prostitution is nice or nasty, there has long been demand for all sorts of disgusting shit, because humans are stupid and shitty and self-serving. The fact that enough people to fund a 50,000/year trafficking habit think that it would be nice to own a slave - and the fact that they are able to identify several thousand years' worth of cultural precedents for slave-keeping - does not for a minute imply that they should be permitted to do so. Or would you think it reasonable to re-establish slavery given that 50,000/year would then be better treated as a result? I think not...

      Argue for legal prostitution by all means, but the "People have always done it" argument is not a convincing one.

    107. Re:oh darn by flyneye · · Score: 1

      W4M section I guess.
      At least the casual encounters section is still there with all its entertainment value.
      I always like to peruse the MW4M section to see all the cuckolds that want their wives interracially impregnated and make fun of their photos.
      I also follow the antics of a fat tranny in T4M and T4MW. He seems to get beat up and not laid a lot, but posts pretty funny pictures of himself.
      Pervert watching for free. Who can beat that? Craigslist is the filthy underbelly of Americas Funniest Home Videos, but without the video, if you get what I'm saying. Real People acting real stupid to get laid, it's just golden.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    108. Re:oh darn by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with prostitution anyway?

      Tying sexual success to economic success leads to a world of greedy, avaricious bastards and greedy, gold-digging bitches. I believe in a woman's right to sell her snatch if she so chooses. I also think that women who do this are making the world a worse place, not a better one. That's why "whore" is an insult. Indeed, it falls on the continuum somewhere on the bitch side of slut. You know the old joke right? A slut sleeps with everyone, while a bitch sleeps with everyone but you. Well, a whore sleeps with people for money, which is everyone but you if you're broke.

      Capitalism is like your alcoholic relatives. Sure, sometimes they give you a check, but most of the time they just erode your self-esteem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    109. Re:oh darn by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      Short term observations may mislead you. How do these girls end up? Usually rather badly. How many kids do they have and how do they end up? How about the spread of diseases? Prostitution is the greatest factor in the overwhelming AIDS epidemic in Africa. In the US there are serious problems with pimps in some cities that have been unending. A hooker working in Chicago will have a pimp or else whereas other large cities such as Miami tend not to have pimps as a rule. Then you will also find that the girls don't declare much in the way of taxes and have tiny Social Security checks and no retirement plans when they get old. They also are usually not the brightest bulbs when it comes to carrying health and disability policies. In cities where hookers normally work in strip clubs there are also serious organized crime connections as a norm.
                            My point is that it is not religious objections that make many people fear legalization of prostitution. It might be possible to regulate prostitution to a level that would eliminate many of the issues but it would take a lot of invasive laws and a huge governmental effort to regulate it correctly. And if we do regulate it we may create another host of problems. How easy would it be for a regulator to trade blindness for sex or cash?
                            Unfortunately we have an issue that reminds me of the abortion issue. The well off can always travel to get an abortion. So any abortion laws passed in the US will only apply to the poor and near poor. That is exactly like the prostitution issue. Burma, the Philippines or even Jamaica already are places frequently used for sex vacations as forms of prostitution are very common in these places. Sadly this sometimes involves children.

    110. Re:oh darn by flyneye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You shouldn't come here then, we have a sgt. on the local military base who's been going around spreading AIDS at swingers events and I guess he has for a couple years now. They have him locked up on base pending action while they are trying to get names of people he screwed. He knew he had it too. I specifically wouldn't put my unit anywhere near a swinger in this city.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    111. Re:oh darn by digitig · · Score: 1

      Because he knows there aren't any, and though this stuff often masquerades as religious in reality it's purely cultural.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    112. Re:oh darn by digitig · · Score: 1

      Fast-food work is as physically dangerous, emotionally debilitating, unregulated, lacking in any benefits, controlled by highly abusive bosses and as associated with severe social stigma as prostitution.

      Fast-food workers across the world are typically as desperate for money as prostitutes.

      At the farming end of the fast-food industry I'd say that was a pretty accurate summary.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    113. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it more moral to let the woman starve? If they have no choice except prostitution, then if they can't prostitute themselves they can just die?

      See, there's a thing called the welfare state that generally helps people of either gender to avoid starving, even if they're outside the relatively narrow bracket of personal characteristics relied upon to enable a career in prostitution.

      Strange thought, I know.

    114. Re:oh darn by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Prostitutes are paid a lot more than workers at MacDonalds so maybe a better comparison is working as a nurse or soldier. There are much more disgusting and dangerous jobs than being a hooker, which is why half the stigma of of being one comes from the perception that they are lazy.

    115. Re:oh darn by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      The problem with Craiglist is that it bypasses the normal channels thus reduces kickbacks to law enforcement. That's why local officials get so pissed off about it - women who get their work that way can avoid paying the cops to look the other way.

    116. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      At least 5, many of them having been posted to slashdot before. Go look through the archives, since I don't have the links handy.

      Suffice it to say a number of law enforcement agencies were using craigslist to easily catch prostitutes, but getting greedy, decided they should file suit against them (civil I believe.) to cash in on the political capital such a move offers.

      So long story short CL is closing it because some douchebags were being douches, even though the only reason it had been added to CL in the first place was the clear up casual encounters for people actually WANTING casual encounters. Maybe they can just add a 'non-commercial casual encounters' section and deprecate CE into an adult services category without the adult services name. But YMMV and all that.

    117. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you'll hear people arguing that it is more immoral to tax people in a welfare state than it is to give desperate/mentally-unstable/unintelligent/addicted/whatever women the alternatives of prostitution or starvation.

    118. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh heh heh. That's a nice html link tag you've got there. Why don't you get C0CKING now?

    119. Re:oh darn by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By your logic, lots of dangerous occupations should be made illegal because they are dangerous or psychologically stressful. Of course, this is complete rubbish and we're left again with nothing but the puritanical notion that sex is "dirty" and that sex for money is especially dirty, which also, of course, is complete rubbish.

    120. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose it's inevitable that the general public would think that women only decide to work as prostitutes when they are desperate. Here in Canada at least this is not the case. Most of the girls you meet will be only too happy to tell you about their day job, which isn't necessarily low paying. The majority of girls here don't get into prostitution to make ends meet, but to afford a higher standard of living. I'm also told that (by some?) in the Netherlands, prostitution is seen as a valid career option. Women will kiss their husbands goodbye in the morning, put in their shift in the Red Light District, and then come home for dinner. I realize this is not the case World-wide, but we do need to stop thinking of all prostitutes as victims because many do choose their line of work.

    121. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how you think morals are formed

      "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" is a good starting point. The golden rule has been around longer than pretty much every surviving religion, and can be traced back in written form to Hammurabi's "do unto others as they did to you" Code, though the concept of retribution almost certainly predates even that.

      There are other good tests too. "What would happen if everyone did this?" "Does this act require the use of force?" etc.

    122. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a dirty job.
      So?
      There are people in this world who as part of their jobs have to spend all day surounded by human faeces working sewer maintainance with all the dangers of infections that entails.
      There are people who work jobs where they can lose a limb to a saw blade.
      Or be crushed in an industrial accident.
      I know a girl who had a job where one of her duties was to put down the animals at a lab which used animal testing, think that has no psychological ramifications?
      My father at one point worked in a slaughterhouse cleaning the grizzle, blood and brains off the walls and equipment. any psychological ramifications there?

      There are high class office jobs where conditions are better, but unless the person happens to be skilled and lucky enough to land that kind of job they're not going to get those.

      But sure, if sex is in any way involved then its special and it can't be considered in a reasonable adult manner.

    123. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food service: Hepatitis, Cold, Flu, Salmonella, E. Coli. Hell even HIV, depending on who you work with. Probably other things depending on foods being served.

      Point is you can find ways to make arguements for the hazardousness of the job for any profession you can think of.

    124. Re:oh darn by vakuona · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When did work become a bad thing? For kids. How is it a bad thing to encourage your kids to develop a good work ethic? Of course, kids should have time to play and rest and enjoy their childhood, but I am sure those kids who see their parents work, and who work alongside them in their family businesses genuinely respect their parents efforts and learn from their parents the value of godo honest labour. Terrible that!

    125. Re:oh darn by Servaas · · Score: 1

      I live in the Netherlands and I have "worked" for my parents since I was 14. My parents have a gamble/token palace on a fair/kermis (Carnival I guess) - you realize how many chicks I scored with growing up? I take that "job" over packaging store shelf's or a deep frier's any day! "Dad, gonna be gone for a few minutes! Gonna fuck a girl behind the big wheel!" "Oke Son, be sure to bag it though, don't know what these hicks have on them." You know, if I wasn't a geek and hadn't had parents who teach you ideals etc :)

    126. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Because if my life is shitty, her life should be even shitter."

      So you think a prostitutes life would be better if she couldn't get any clients?
      really?

      It's an unpleasent job which few people are willing to do and for which there is a high demand which as such tends to pay well(unless someone else like a pimp is taking the income).

    127. Re:oh darn by whitehaint · · Score: 1

      Dating is legalised prostitution. You spend money on a chick hoping she will put out, or you spend money on a chick, don't have to listen to her talk about her cat fluffy AND you get laid!

    128. Re:oh darn by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with prostitution anyway? In the end all girls cost money, many times much more than if you just get to the point right away.

      I'm pretty sure the people who object to prostitution don't object to it on the grounds that you get less bang for your buck.

    129. Re:oh darn by greyc · · Score: 1

      I thought the "dying in the fields" phrasing was an exaggeration you used for dramatic effect, but apparently it didn't originate with you. The argument I was talking about, which is a fairly standard libertarian one (and there's a good chance you've heard it anyway; I just want to avoid possible misunderstandings), runs roughly as follows:
      1. Individual situations and lives are complex. Whether a voluntary exchange of goods is a net positive for someone depends on a lot of factors, many of which are much easier to evaluate for the individual involved than for any outside observer. The individual in question also typically has better incentives for getting the answer right than a third party, which (among other things) helps safeguard against many kinds of irrationality.
      2. Therefore, not hurting people directly through commercial transactions is usually quite simple: Don't apply force, and be honest. Obviously forcing people into transactions is bad; robbing or raping people is clearly immoral. The same goes for defrauding them in voluntary transactions (by lying about your product, paying them with counterfeit money, or whatever).
      3. Aside from those two obvious things, you're usually best off focusing on whether a given possible deal is good for you. If everyone does that, you get the people with the best information judging the efficiency of transactions, and most of such transactions will then end up mutually beneficial.
      4. For similar reasons, judging that a given deal between two third party entities is directly morally bad requires that at least one of them is applying force, engaging in fraud, or catastrophically irrational (and also catastrophically more irrational than the actor making the judgement; unfortunately, it's very common for people to erroneously settle on this explanation). This is the standard argument as to why corporations running sweatshops (assuming the work contracts are voluntary, they don't inordinately pollute the environment, etc.) aren't necessarily doing anything immoral, and AFAIK it is valid.

      Now, this is just about the direct moral consequences on the actors involved. By engaging in honest voluntary transactions, you might still be doing indirect harm by supporting an evil business. If you buy stuff from Sony, you're indirectly supporting DRM. If you buy NetApp devices, you're indirectly supporting software patent litigation. And if you do business with slavetraders, you're indirectly supporting slavery.
      If you were making this last point, then fair enough, but note that this really only applies where you expect your money to go to an evil organization - when you're dealing with someone who's just voluntarily (i.e., not being coerced through threat of violence by other individuals or similar) offering sexual services for money, there's nothing morally wrong about doing business with them.
      This also doesn't necessarily conflict with libertarian ideology very much. Libertarians don't typically condone forcing people into transactions, and many would agree that there's a role for government in preventing literal slavery (but note that "wage slavery" is really a horrible misnomer, and I'm not including that concept here).

    130. Re:oh darn by Kjella · · Score: 1

      So what do you think of swingers clubs and the people that go there? People that go clubbing every weekend to get some casual sex? Gold diggers that sleep with people by the size of their wallet? A lot of people distinguish between sex for pleasure and sex for love. And if you cling to the notion that it's still for mutual pleasure then I think you don't understand the concept of "give none, get none". It's quite easy to explain through egoistic motivation, not any genuine interest in satisfying their partner. So-called "fucking friends" is pretty much a mutual exchange of sex services, not a relationship.

      There's a huge gap between "I want to have sex with you" and "I'd rather not have sex with you". The former means you're at the top of the list, having beaten all other partners and activities. The latter means it's not something they'd voluntarily do under any circumstance, even if they were snowed in on a cabin alone with you and horny as fuck they'd rather get off on their own. When I go out I don't feel that I'm so unattractive that women don't want me, but I also see many better looking, better talking, better dancing guys competing for the same women. I really don't see the problem with some women saying they'd rather set a low bar and have them compete on money instead.

      Of course there are prostitutes that don't have it like that, but dragging out the worst examples every time get silly particularly when most of the problems with human trafficking, sex slaves, pimps for protection and so on could be solved through legalized brothels, required health checks and the general protection we give workplaces. Also the business would no longer be dominated by illegal immigrants and immigrants on tourist visa, you'd need a work permit to work legit and that's where I'd think most people would go. It'd also get much of it out of the streets and residential areas and back into commercial areas zoned for it. Instead we still seem to live under the illusion that we'll extinguish the world's oldest profession, the worst you can get is people that'll talk delusional fantasy and not if reality will be better or worse off.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    131. Re:oh darn by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sleeping with some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real date because you need the money has no psychological ramifications?

      How is that different from feeding some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real meal because you need the money?

    132. Re:oh darn by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, I pity the enslaved kidnapped prostitutes who were advertising themselves on Craigslist.

    133. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, read about him. What a prick (in more ways than one).

      We tried looking up the his two supposed user names on one of the sites to verify the story, but it just came back as invalid - so we couldn't confirm that username existed.

    134. Re:oh darn by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      The only ones I really pity (besides the kidnapped, sold and/or enslaved the other repliers keep addressing) are those who are victims of certain kind of drugs. They are the equivalent of the street junkies robbing and stealing throughout the day to finance their addiction, like zombies.

    135. Re:oh darn by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      You mean from the woman or the fast-food worker?

      Yes.

    136. Re:oh darn by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

      Just like illegal drugs, there is an entire industry around illegal sex trade, probably a trillion dollar business. Just like drugs, rich and powerful people who control prostitution at many levels would be irreparably harmed by legalization. The virtuously moral people who work hard to keep drugs and prostitution illegal because they are immoral are fully supported by the people who profit the most from the illegal activity. Together, they make a united front that perpetuates their self interests, sort of like the tyrant and the terrorist.

    137. Re:oh darn by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see where you show that prostitution is unhealthy. Sure, street-workers, usually heroin addicts or trafficking victims, that's obviously unhealthy.
      But how are the higher class escorts unhealthy? They have sex, for money. Nothing unhealthy in and of itself with that. They almost always use protection, which is a lot more than you can say for a lot of girls you can pickup in a bar for a one-night stand. Escorts are professional, tend to work with security people to ensure their safety, get medically tested from time to time and take care of themselves.

      I don't know how things stand in your neck of the woods, but here in Scotland, their job isn't illegal, the police ignore them if they don't cause a mess (like brothels can become a nuisance for the community, but escorts generally don't) and they pay their taxes. They also get paid very well for something a lot of us find a pleasant activity anyway.

      I don't know many escorts (and I've never had any "professional" dealings with one) but I knew a couple of girls who plied the trade for a while and they loved the job. Their only caveat was that because some people are a bit bigoted, it can make it tricky when people ask what you do for a living

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    138. Re:oh darn by Posting=!Working · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are plenty of jobs that have a similar list of risks. Some are worse.

      For example, welding at a shipyard - Do you think they like getting burned everyday? Climbing up a 30 foot ladder to find it's not tied off at the top and one side is a half inch from freefall? Do you think the riggers have actually double checked every single time the crane picks up a huge sheet of steel that passes over your head? Crawling through a disgusting, stinking crawlspace under the floor of a barge while someone might start welding on the same piece of steel that your entire backside is pressed against? Having my safety depending on some dumb ass who couldn't get a job that required knowing how to read or do math? I think your chances are better with the condom.

      I'll give you that working at most McDonalds is not nearly as bad, but all McDonalds are not the same.

      Crappy McDonalds in crime ridden area- Ever had a gun shoved in your face while getting robbed? Ever been sprayed with mace for just working the drivethrough window? Had a smelly crazy homeless guy cough on you while ordering and try to pee on you when done? Been badly burned by fry grease?

      I'm not saying prostitution isn't a crappy way to have to make a living. I'm just saying there are legal jobs that people take that carry a similar level risks and discomforts, and many people have no other choice but to take them.

      I'm only talking about those who prostitute themselves for economic reasons. I am not including physically forced prostitution in any of this, that's slavery, and horrible.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    139. Re:oh darn by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      (1) Prostitutes aren't necessarily "pretty" - don't get your ideas on the sex industry from Western porn sites;

      Not necessarily pretty, but not necessarily ugly either. What's your point? Personally, I get my ideas on the sex industry from watching "Las Vegas Jailhouse". :-P

      (2) Men have far more employment opportunities. Most societies still overtly discriminate against women, sometimes because they're physically weaker and sometimes just because.

      In the United States, and indeed, in most Western countries, this statement is far from true. Here, not only is it illegal to discriminate against women, but it is commonly seen as distasteful; morally reprehensible even. In fact, due to affirmative action, in most cases, a woman is more likely to get a particular job over and equally qualified man.

      Furthermore, neither of these statements furthers your point at all.

      Are they OK now? Just because some uneducated kid is fooled into thinking that prostitution is a lucrative way out of poverty it doesn't mean you get to judge them any differently when they're physically and emotionally broken a year later.

      You don't get judge them, either. It isn't for you to decide how other people live their lives.

    140. Re:oh darn by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      girls come to talk with you and you order them a few drinks and maybe play a round of billiard and just have good time.

      Not to burst your bubble, but... you know when they have a good time? They're acting. It's the money, you see...

    141. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good sir you owe me a new laptop :D

    142. Re:oh darn by thunderclap · · Score: 1, Troll

      Whats wrong? Poverty is linked to it. You want to see the bad side? Tell one of those girls you are going to fly them to your home. Those girls are poor this is how they live. They don't love sex anymore than you love working. they have too. Its the same anywhere. Prostitution exists because of poverty and lust. Which are you will to do? Go into a cathouse where they claim its clean but has cameras, bouncers, a cashier and a condom machine to pick a girl, or pick one off the street? Most do it because of the anonymity. And that has nothing to do with religion.

    143. Re:oh darn by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      There was no argument made that sex is immoral. Sex is not the same as paying prostitutes.

      True, but only in the same way that eating a sandwich is not the same as buying a sandwich from Subway.

      There was no argument made that prostitution should be illegal. I pointed out that there are good arguments to make prostitution entirely legal.

      I must've missed where you said that.

      Morality and legality are not the same thing. Even insane chain-smoking cult leader Ayn Rand understood this.

      Ad hominem attacks on a prominent libertarian author do nothing to further your point and everything to make you look silly.

    144. Re:oh darn by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you talked to many escorts to come to this conclusion? It really doesn't sound like it.

      Talking to escorts about the world of prostitution is like talking to McDonalds CEO about the world of fast food workers. Try talking to the girls down on the low track instead.
       

      They made the choice to go into the industry.

      Yeah, the same way someone who can't find a job making a living wage and with a future 'chooses' to go to work with McDonalds or Best Buy.
       
      You, and many others answering here, have a seriously rosy view of the world.

    145. Re:oh darn by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Well I believe most of the controversy is about the girls that are forced to become prostitutes, not the ones that decide to on their own.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    146. Re:oh darn by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      How about asking "Is it moral for me to tell others how to live and what they can and cannot do?" What ever happened to freedom? Freedom of choice and to chose?

      So why is it not moral for the government to tell women they cannot take the health risks (among other risks) of being a prostitute - yet it is moral for the government to tell the painter you just hired that he must wear a dust mask to avoid health risks?

    147. Re:oh darn by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      If its between 2 or more consenting adults the government should keep its nose out.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    148. Re:oh darn by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      You can't equate prostitution with serving fast food. The former carries all sorts of risks

      Yep, and it pays $300/hr+ (here in Vegas, possibly less elsewhere) and serving fast food pays $8/hr. 1 hour of easy work or 40 hours of hard work for the same money. Some women decide that the risk is worth it, some don't.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    149. Re:oh darn by wmac · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean all prostitutes are prostitutes because they are poor?

      Don't you remember the girl which messed up the governors life? She became a prostitute in order to become rich very fast. I personally knew a prostitute which owned and rented several apartments.

      Some women try to find a rich man just because they want to become rich ASAP. What is the difference with a prostitute then? (except that some of them agree to be exclusive by signing a marriage contract).

    150. Re:oh darn by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      philosophers will tell you, must not be confused with "is desperate for money and willing to do it because there is no viable alternative"

      And..?

      Do you know why people might be desperate for money? Because you need money to live. You can exchange it for goods and services which you require in order to survive, and which you may not be able to produce yourself.

      So, what you seem to be saying, is that it's better that someone considering prostitution should die, rather than be allowed to engage in it.

      Because if you're really suggesting that there should be social services available so that they don't need to resort to prostitution, then your argument for making it unlawful kind of evaporates.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    151. Re:oh darn by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      In Sweden, prostitution is not illegal, but being a pimp and frequenting a prostitute are illegal. Imagine the wonderful nature of your transaction of: "if you stiff me, I can call the cops, and they'll arrest you, and I walk away." Clients won't screw their prostitutes in this case. The same with pimps. "Go ahead, slap me... I'll call the cops, and they'll haul you away, and I can admit openly that I'm a prostitute, and I won't get taken away."

      How about making prostitution a SAFE profession, rather than demanding it be illegal to stop people from doing it? If you're concerned about their health from the sex alone, either physical and/or mental, then when shall we expect an intent to make promiscuity itself illegal?

      reminds me of a documentary where a camera crew was tagging along to an early morning bust of illegal (Mexican) workers at a few plants in California; targeting 'the worker' (instead of the corporations) seemed a clear proponent to imposing and sustaining horrible working (and even living) conditions onto the workforce

    152. Re:oh darn by thunderclap · · Score: 0, Troll

      You mean all prostitutes are prostitutes because they are poor? Don't you remember the girl which messed up the governors life? She became a prostitute in order to become rich very fast. I personally knew a prostitute which owned and rented several apartments. Some women try to find a rich man just because they want to become rich ASAP. What is the difference with a prostitute then? (except that some of them agree to be exclusive by signing a marriage contract).

      Yes she was poor alright. Poor in intelligence. Honestly who becomes a escort to become rich?

    153. Re:oh darn by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      Gee, why don't you try if you don't know the difference?

    154. Re:oh darn by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. Several countries have legal prostitution. I live in one. Most women don't want to be a prostitute and thus won't sell themselves for money. Those that do aren't going to flirt with you first - probably because that would mean spending an enormous amount of time getting paid the same as if they were up-front and had the sex right away.

      For further information look at how legal alcohol didn't destroy society.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    155. Re:oh darn by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no physical force => legal => moral

      I would put that as "no physical force => moral => legal" actually, with two qualifications: (1) it applies to responsible adults only of course, and (2) physical force can take many forms. For example theft and fraud are forms of physical force. Can you explain what is wrong with it? Either those women have a choice or they do not. If they do, then where is the problem? You are one human being, they are another. You don't have any more right to decide what they should do than I have to decide what you should do as long as you are not harming somebody else. If they do NOT have a choice and only do it because they will genuinely starve if they don't, then what kind of a monster are you to suggest that it is immoral to hire a person who will die of hunger if you don't? If they don't have a choice because another person is physically forcing them to do it then that is a very serious crime already and we have laws dealing with kidnapping, slavery etc.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    156. Re:oh darn by torkus · · Score: 1

      Your post assumes people generally enjoy their work, something I rather doubt. Given the choice just about everyone i know would now work.

      Fast food work (and other menial jobs) certainly CAN be dangerous and it's quite insulting if you've ever worked it. Furthermore you can liken that to a prostitute/pimp arrangement. The cashier will bring in $1,000s per shift depending on the store yet is paid a few dollars an hour. The difference is, if the manager beats a cashier that cashier can call the police. Why? Because being a cashier hasn't been made illegal. Cashiers haven't been told their job is the bane of our existence. They can go to the police for protection. A prostitute can't. A prostitute is FORCED to live in the shady world not because of her profession but because of the laws that "righteous" and "moral" people enforce.

      And finally...fast food workers are usually kids, immigrants, or uneducated people being taken advantage of by big corporations because they don't know any better. Imagine if McDonalds had to pay their workers a livable wage?

      Now look from a different perspective. Excluding drug-addicted streetwalkers (who are often enough the product of the system that bans then) prostitutes make a few hundred dollars an hour, some thousands. Laywers and doctors can do that too - after 20 years of school and training. A girl getting 200 an hour to lie on her back and moan a bit seems a pretty good deal for her.

      Are some girls victimized? Of course. And it happens more in underground professions because of the lack of accountability. Are people victimized in other jobs? Surely. Why is it somehow illegal because it involves sex? Oh, that's right, because YOU (and/or people like you) want to impose YOUR morals on OTHER PEOPLE. I hate rap music - I really loathe it. I'm not trying to make it so you can't listen to it tho.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    157. Re:oh darn by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Essentially you're positing that a world where not everyone has unlimited resources is a world without upsides as the economic struggle turns everyone into soulless monsters.

      That's a pretty dark but certainly interesting philosophy.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    158. Re:oh darn by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Craigslist made it easier, women probably got so many johns that they could be selective. Now that it's gone they'll have to work twice as hard to for half the clients and put themselves in risky situations because they need the money. Craigslist just fucked them worse than the johns did, thanks craigslist!

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    159. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sort of wondering how this can be insightful. Is it being honest but naive? Is it sarcastic?

      If you don't think a pimp can drag an unwilling female around the country and advertise her services on Craigslist that's pretty naive. But then you seem to be a European so naivete, willful ignorance, and overlooking atrocities are par for the course.

    160. Re:oh darn by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, to play devil's advocate why not ban those professions? Because there is no substitute for air traffic controller or infantry grunt, and society needs them. Society doesn't need prostitutes to ensure sex happens, although possibly not *enough* sex will happen.

      It's too simplistic either way; to assume that sex work is automatically dirty, dangerous and degrading on one hand, or to assume that it cannot be so otherwise. My personal, a priori inclination would be to legalize prostitution and regulate it to minimize the dangers to the workers and public health. But there will always be prostitution which falls below any standard one would choose to set as "decent". At the very least I hope we could agree that prostitution should be consensual if it exists at all, but there will always be customers who are all the more attracted to non-consensual sexual encounters because they are forbidden. And as with every contraband market, there will be businesses that serve it and profit by an economic niche with (pun recognized but not intended) barriers to entry.

      Prostitution is historically been a last ditch profession for many women who ply that trade. Obviously it doesn't logically have to be so for all prostitutes, but it will probably always be so for many. Combine this vulnerability with customers who actually want a dirty, dangerous and brutal experience with a vulnerable woman or child, and it is clear that prostitution will always have its dark side.

      The very fact that prostitution has this ineradicable dark side probably argues for some kind legalization and policing, because those aspects of prostitution that we'd most like to prevent cannot be eliminated by any sort of a ban. Legalization and well designed regulation could force sex businesses to take one of two paths: entirely legitimate with all the normal protections of law, or totally outside the law.

      Would this reduce the dark side of prostitution? I think that's too much to hope, so we shouldn't legalize it with that purpose in mind. If we legalize it, it should be because the forms of prostitution that are legalized can be made tolerable within our concept of justice and are bound to happen anyway. Outlawing such forms of prostitution serves little or no purpose for considerable cost.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    161. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so why single out prostitution as being somehow worse than the other ones?

      You don't site any comparative examples in your post, but prostitution often involves human trafficking, sexual slavery and drug addiction. You can't call them willing participants. And worse, a subset of these women are underage, meaning you can't call it legal even if they are willing. The solution that seems to work best is to license and regulate it, as well as restricting it to red light districts much like they've done in Europe or Singapore.

      I would be concerned if we allowed prostitution any time and any place. Not only would it make the afore mentioned problems harder to control, but inevitably these "districts" would form themselves, inviting a transient lifestyle and all the criminal elements that goes with it.

    162. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In the immortal words of George Carlin... "Selling is legal... Sex is legal... Why isn't selling sex legal?"

    163. Re:oh darn by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

      But did they clutter up "casual encounters" that much when the adult section was around? If they didn't then it sure shows that the section worked.

      I don't see the problem with having an adult section.

      If it bothers people, those people just should stop going there.

      As for kids, just install some nanny software or a proxy and let them learn to use their brains to think of clever ways of getting at porn or find other things to do :).

      --
    164. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't equate prostitution with fast food. The latter carries all sorts of risks, even when it's a licensed and regulated. You think every sandwich is going to be tested for e. coli, hepatitis, salmonella, or poison first? Exercise is 100% effective? You think eating food that makes you bloated and fat and eventually kills you with heart disease because you don't have the money or time for better food has no psychological ramifications?

      Sure, there are nicer restaurants, but unless you have the money for it, it is far far different than visiting a brothel.

    165. Re:oh darn by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh that's why it pays a lot more than serving fast food. A lot more. Higher risk, higher pay. It might even be safer than doing night-shift in 7-11 or similar places, and it sure as hell pays a lot better.

      And if you don't want to sleep with a disgusting old lard, don't. Who's forcing you? It's the illegal prostitution rings that really force women to do what they don't want to do - they lock the women up in rooms etc. So if prostitution was legal and well regulated it'll be a lot better for the prostitute (and their customers).

      I don't recommend prostitution as a job (I've actually discouraged someone from doing so, hopefully she's got a safer job now - I doubt it pays as well though). It's a bit like one of those "star jobs" (sports athletes, actresses etc) but not as bad in some ways- the top bunch get a lot of money, the mid bunch get a fair bit, the rest just get by. And when you get less attractive the money dries up, and you better have other skills or have enough money stashed away.

      --
    166. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is a huge push from sex workers to legalize sex working, and many who enjoy it. There is the IUSW (International Union of Sex Workers), the now defunct $pread Magazine, and an entire movement within sex positive feminism for the legalization of this work. As far as you wanting to say that the professional dominatrix is an exception if prostitution was legal then sex workers could price their services as they see fit, work within brothels that provide all benefits and medical services, and compete within a legal market. Sure it's hard to say with any real evidence that the majority of sex workers enjoy their work, but it's equally hard to say that all sex workers are some battered woman stereotype right out of a Lifetime movie.

    167. Re:oh darn by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those girls are poor this is how they live. They don't love sex anymore than you love working.

      Sounds like a job. What's wrong with that? We allow people to do all sorts of awful, dangerous things for money, why not sex? Poor working conditions are a case for increased regulation, not prohibition.

      There is *no* reason for prostitution to be illegal except for a perverse notion of sexual morality associated with religion. None.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    168. Re:oh darn by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Prostitution is the greatest factor in the overwhelming AIDS epidemic in Africa.

      Along with bad healthcare (AIDS isn't detected quickly), poverty (infected hookers can't afford not to work), lack of condoms (those things aren't free you know) and, in the war-torn areas, rape.

      In the US there are serious problems with pimps in some cities that have been unending.

      That's an artifact of prostitution being illegal. When Germany legalized prostitution, we immediately outlawed pimping, which has been fairly (but of course not entirely) successful. Without legalization, such control is not possible.

      Then you will also find that the girls don't declare much in the way of taxes and have tiny Social Security checks and no retirement plans when they get old.

      Another artifact of prostitution being illegal. Of course they're not going to declare illegal income. Prostitutes in countries with legal prostitution pay their taxes like everyone else and collect retirement benefits like everyone else.

      They also are usually not the brightest bulbs when it comes to carrying health and disability policies.

      That really depends, although it's again less pronounced in countries with legal prostitution. Legal prostitution can be regulated; for instance you can demand sex workers to have themselves checked for STDs at regular intervals. The police can do spot checks for correct, genuine paperwork. Also, as far as reportages are to be trusted, the better brothels usually have something like this as an internal policy - if you can't prove you have been checked in the last N months you're not allowed to work there. Infected hookers mean a bad reputation, which means fewer customers.

      In cities where hookers normally work in strip clubs there are also serious organized crime connections as a norm.

      Again an artifact of prohibition, although I admit that organized crime can be involved even where it's legal. Still, you're not going to reduce the involvement of organized crime by pushing the whole thing where society can't control it at all. Look at the prohibition of alcohol and the War on Drugs to see how that policy tends to be very profitable for organized crime.

      It might be possible to regulate prostitution to a level that would eliminate many of the issues but it would take a lot of invasive laws and a huge governmental effort to regulate it correctly. And if we do regulate it we may create another host of problems. How easy would it be for a regulator to trade blindness for sex or cash?

      Note that these concerns apply to a lot of legal jobs. How can we trust car importers not to traffic drugs? How can we trust waste disposal companies not to just dump the stuff in a lake? Why should pharma companies bother whether their products are 100% pure or not? We have a lot of professions that require regulation. Society hasn't collapsed yet.

      Burma, the Philippines or even Jamaica already are places frequently used for sex vacations as forms of prostitution are very common in these places. Sadly this sometimes involves children.

      ...which wouldn't happen as much if you had legal prostitution in your own country where it can be regulated according to your own values.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    169. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why isn't prostitution legal? Because all girls are whores anyway, amirite fellas?"

      Thanks for keeping it real, Slashdot

    170. Re:oh darn by martyngold · · Score: 0

      I agree with Raven spear

    171. Re:oh darn by martyngold · · Score: 0

      I agree completely but there were a lot of idiots abusing that section posting 30 - 40 times a day! I promote London Escorts and never had the urge to post it on the Craigslist.

    172. Re:oh darn by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      I have not read any evidence that a majority of prostitutes work because they enjoy being prostitutes. Have you?

      I have not read any evidence that the majority of people work because they enjoy their jobs. Have you?

    173. Re:oh darn by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't equate prostitution with serving fast food. The former carries all sorts of risks, even when it's a licensed and regulated brothel. You think every customer is going to have a HIV and STD test first?

      Ok, compare prostitution to steel workers, coal miners, or fishermen. There are lots of dangerous jobs. Either ban them AND prostituion, ban neither, or accept that prostitution is illegal for reasons of sexual morality and not safety.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    174. Re:oh darn by Kilrah_il · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why the hack were you modded Troll?!? People, put your mod points to good use.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    175. Re:oh darn by Hatta · · Score: 1

      But enjoying physically and psychologically harmful working conditions day after day and believing (correctly or otherwise) that there's no way out is likely more harmful than hearing one lie about how pretty your eyes are.

      So provide prostitutes with a safe working environment and career counseling.

      And johns ought to ask whether it's okay to pay to support that environment rather than playing the pseudo-libertarian "no physical force => legal => moral" card.

      Johns aren't at fault for the harm caused by prostitution, legislators are.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    176. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh there are many typically legal jobs out there that are dangerous and pay worse (assuming you meet the necessary prerequisites ;) ) and have worse working conditions.

      Take coal miners for instance, or most other sorts of miners too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_accident

      If your electricity comes from coal, you share a small part of the blame.

      And in the USA, mining is probably not as dangerous a job as driving a taxi:

      http://www.businessinsider.com/the-15-most-dangerous-jobs-in-america-2010-3/no-11-taxi-drivers-and-chauffeurs-5

      I doubt that _legal_ prostitution has that high a fatality rate per 100k. Even considering AIDS etc. Most of high death reports are about illegal prostitutes.

      Illegal prostitution is very dangerous (very high death rates - 200/100K), and often the women have no choice (as in really no choice at all) - they are kidnapped and enslaved.

      If people want to be a prostitute, they better stick to where it is legal. Customers will tend to be better behaved, and you will avoid more of the evil people who get their kicks from abusing women or worse, and thus your life expectancy will go up.

      Just look at miners in China for an example of how poor/no regulation sucks for workers. They die in the thousands per year! Whereas in the US where it is regulated it is much safer. If you voluntarily work in an illegal mine you're probably stupid, if someone kidnaps you and forces you to mine, the fact that mining is regulated contributed little to your problem.

    177. Re:oh darn by cynyr · · Score: 1

      Well if they are going to yell "BUT YOU PAID HER FOR SEX" how is that different than "but you bought her dinner and are helping pay rent, and utilities".

      Also how come porn is legal then, people are having sex for money there as well, but the difference is both are getting paid by a third party, and there is a camera.

      I wonder what would happen if you got a man and a woman prostitute and asked them to fuck each other while you watched? would that be legal? what if I have a camera, video or otherwise?

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    178. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50 burgers A DAY? Have you WORKED in fast food? During lunch, you could easily double that figure in half an hour or less.
       
      50 Strangers a day? Assuming 8 hours for sleep, no breaks, and no cleanup in between, thats 20 minutes per customer. Most escorts charge by the hour, some by the half hour. Can you scale the hyperbole back a notch?

    179. Re:oh darn by beakerMeep · · Score: 1

      How are the realities of an industry orthogonal? I'm not arguing for or against prostitution, just saying that the world is not the black and white version you see. The point was, and still is, not all prostitutes are there by choice and they face unique challenges due to the nature of the industry. Any legalization of such a business needs to take that into account. Personally, I think I lean towards legalizing it, but with strong worker protections, and stronger efforts put into breaking up human trafficking rings.

      The issue just isn't as simple as "hookers like being hookers" or "McDonalds employees hate McDonalds." Either way, you're clearly intelligent but your intellect isn't dizzying either, the guy made a fair point.

      --
      meep
    180. Re:oh darn by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      "I've not considered having sex a goal"

      Going on the assumption that you're male, I hope you do understand that sex is the goal of EVERYTHING that you do. It was one of Freud's basic pleasure principles. Sure the guy may have been coked up, but he did have some pretty good insights into the human psych.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    181. Re:oh darn by torkus · · Score: 1

      You've never been to a strip club but consider it degrading...but you've never been to one!. You're part of the problem - judging people and actions you have zero familiarity with and then suggesting laws or rules to govern it.

      Creating more laws to outlaw pimping is just as useless. The whole industry is already underground, you just force it further in that direction. If prostitution was legal there generally wouldn't be a need for pimps.

      I agree that legalizing prostitution is a good idea - and ultimately the only workable solution. 'Regulating the fuck out of it' makes for a hilarious play on works though :)

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    182. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that you chose to censor Carlin on an article about censorship.

      (He actually said "Selling is legal... fucking is legal... why isn't selling fucking legal?")

    183. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never had to clean the grill or the deep fryer...

    184. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. It's far different.

      They get paid far more per hour unless they're a crack whore. Brothels are going to run you 100 for 15 minutes on the "ridiculously cheap and shady" side in the states.

      Or are you just another morale outrage crier who thinks it's inappropriate to appropriately compensate people for risky, or dangerous jobs? Linemen have special boots and belts. They can fail. Firefighters...protective gear. Loggers...helmets and steel toe. Construction Workers. Taxi Drivers (22 fatalities per 100k). Hell, how about *police* ? And of course, the most dangerous...fishing (commercial) with an average pay of $13/hr.

      So don't even think about babbling the prostitution is more dangerous until the stats are published. And even if they are--the argument is largely irrelevant unless it's for legal ones. Crime comes with risks. You decriminalize things, all of the exploitation due to illegitimacy goes away.

      Or are you going to claim watching an exotic dancer is rape next as part of the morale outrage?

    185. Re:oh darn by houghi · · Score: 1

      You can't equate prostitution with serving fast food.

      Indeed. And the reason is that one is illegal and the other is regulated. Regulate prostitution and it will be much safer then say crab fishing (pun intended).

      And with regulate, I not mean make so many laws around it that the only way to oblige is to do it illegally. I mean make it safe and legal.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    186. Re:oh darn by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      You, and many others answering here, have a seriously rosy view of the world.

          Oh, my view of the world is anything but rosy. You've heard all those unemployment numbers that may have been mentioned lately? I was out of work for a year.

          I think you see the various versions of prostitution being more glamorous than others. The girl on the street corner, versus the girl with an escort ad is only a difference in their advertising medium.

          Over the last year, I didn't hold a "Will work for food" sign on a street corner, but I did do anything that friends, family, and friends of theirs needed, just so I didn't go hungry. Maybe my version was more glamorous because I still have my car, and I still have a cell phone. Both were subsidized with favors. I'm still in survival mode, doing what anyone needs so I can survive. It'll be a while before I truly have an income and a place to call "home". We're all whores. We do something for someone in exchange for something. Their work is sex. My work is anything physical or intellectual that would cost more to get done by someone else. Remember that next time you go to work, and smile as the boss tells you to do something you really don't want to do, just so you can get paid. Don't try to hold yourself on higher moral ground, just because your job doesn't involve sex.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    187. Re:oh darn by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Yes. You suffer from a cultural/religious taboo about sex, and people from other cultures and religions suffer from a cultural/religious taboo about touching blood or killing cows.

      There's nothing inherent in the sex act that makes it more emotionally damaging than other acts; that's all in your head, based on your society's enforced rules.
      I'd wager that your average cop goes through much greater emotional turmoil in an average work day than a thespian whose stage is the bed. For less compensation, too; the higher pay helps weighing up for the disdain and outright harassment by those who think they have a unicorn-given right to enforce their own morals and taboos on others.

      Sure, there are sex workers who have a horrible time. There are factory workers and nurses who have a horrible time too. That's not an argument against the occupation -- it's an argument for improving the rights and conditions of the workers.

      The only ways I can think of to really get rid of the world oldest profession would be to either make sex as acceptable as handshakes, or by medicating everyone with a sex drive lower or higher than the average. Neither seems to practical, and I think we have to accept that it's here to stay, and we should make the best out of it whether we think it's a good or an evil.

    188. Re:oh darn by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      You actually hit the nail on the head for #2 and #3 at least

      haha

      Also, here, and in many parts of the world I am sure, a good many prostitutes have chosen their profession above fast food work. That should really tell you something.

    189. Re:oh darn by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Intentionally spreading a fatal disease gets you jail time in Canada.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    190. Re:oh darn by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Informative

      After working in the adult entertainment industry on the tech side, let me tell you that you're half-correct. Some girls do it because they're desperate. The other side of it (that you get wrong) is that there are girls who enjoy making $150K+/yr from sex. Hence, the need for a regulated sex industry (see: Amsterdam).

    191. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, not everyone in your Disney fantasy is just having fun. The problem is that people shouldn't need to have to make money by selling their body. Sadly, despite there being sufficient wealth, we the people don't have access to it; so we end up becoming slaves for it. A sex slave is still a slave as is a wage slave. You can see then, prostitution is about slavery and money and not about love.

    192. Re:oh darn by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most prostitutes do it because they are poor. Making it illegal just makes it more dangerous for the woman and ensures pimps take most of the money.

      Canada has bizarre laws regarding prostitution. Prostitution is legal. Communicating in public to procure the services of a prostitute is illegal. Running a bawdy house if illegal. Being a pimp is illegal. This means street prostitutes, mainly drug addicts, are poor and abused. "Escorts" who are self employed or work for small companies generally are not abused and make good money. Many of the girls at "massage parlours" are recent immigrants being taken advantage of by "snakes" (human smugglers).

      Prostitution should be legal and regulated to make it safer for the women and to prevent the violence and abuse that so many of these women face.

      And don't kid your self that you are doing a poor Thai women a favour by buying her services - she is most likely a prostitute due to extreme poverty, and would much rather be in a normal relationship, and hold down a normal job

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    193. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      She's a friend of a friend, and comes over every night around 12:30 (well, AM...). Hell, she's asleep in my bed right now, poor soul! I'm on Slashdot (afterglow?)! If she wants to set up a payment system I might not be averse...

      Like most such "sins", if you remove the pseudo-morality involved, the current governmental stance against it doesn't hold up. If you permit and regulate it (like any of the other common vices in this country), I believe that many of the associated problems will disappear, not to mention that you'll increase your tax revenue if all those high-class girls start declaring their currently illicit income.

      The Prohibition Effect is very real, and invariably occurs when there is a tremendous demand and significant law-enforcement resources are devoted to restricting the supply. As other posters have pointed out, there are few absolute moral or ethical constraints here: much of it is simply cultural, what is considered acceptable by decades or centuries of tradition ... and what is not. Sexual repression has been a tradition in the United States since its inception, and I look at the anti-prostitution crowd as being a fading reflection of that.

      Yes, I understand that prostitution can have negative consequences for those who engage in it, both for the customer and the supplier, and we'd probably be better off as a society if there were no hookers (probably, I'm not going to make an absolute statement there.) But so do many behaviors that people engage in, many of which are perfect legal. In the end forcing prostitution underground simply because some people find it offensive does everyone a disservice.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    194. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I am genuinely puzzled by the quantity of people who view sex as a sneaky goal rather than an incidental enjoyment of a relationship, and then use this pathological viewpoint to argue, "At least paying for a prostitute is honest!"

      Well, if one is not capable of an actual relationship, then a hooker is probably the next best thing. Not every man has the same attitudes towards the opposite sex. Frankly, I'd just as soon that sociopaths like that get their jollies from the local state-regulated brothel. Reduces the competition for the rest of us.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    195. Re:oh darn by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Sounds like a job. What's wrong with that?
      > We allow people to do all sorts of awful, dangerous things for money, why not sex?

      Yeah just like the "President of the USA" job.

      1) It's a very dangerous job - nearly 10% of the workers got killed because of their job. Converting to deaths per 100000 that's 9090 killed per 100000, more dangerous than the other dangerous legal jobs I'm aware of (if you know of a more dangerous legal job let me know - space shuttle astronaut? 14 deaths per 300+? ).
      2) Some say what they do is immoral.
      3) Millions nowadays seem to say what they do is awful.

      I wouldn't recommend anyone to be a prostitute. Only if there's no other job that you are better suited for.

      Same for President of the USA, I don't think it's such a great job either - there's so much shit up there. If you try to clean too much of it up you'd probably be killed, if you try to clean it a bit of it slowly, you'd still get lots of shit on you, you'll stink and millions of people will still hate you.

      --
    196. Re:oh darn by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you legalize prostitution, pimping is a moot point. Prostitutes only need pimps because prostitution is illegal. Since prostitution is illegal, prostitutes can not rely on the regular societal means of safety, contract enforcement, and law enforcement that every legal business uses, so they are stuck with some sleazy criminal who will go kneecap deadbeat johns and stop other pimps from muscling in on their girls. In exchange for an absurd share of what would otherwise be sizable profits for the worker. May prostitutes work under fear and intimidation from their pimps.

      Do prostitutes in Amsterdam or Vegas have pimps? No. Can the business people who run brothels take all the prostitute's money and abuse them? No, the prostitutes are free to go to work for competitors who will treat them better. Are there crime problems or drug problems disproportionate with other low-end but legal lines of work? Nope. Just legalizing prostitution does a lot to improve the problem of prostitutes being trapped in desperate circumstances.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    197. Re:oh darn by martyngold · · Score: 0

      I work with escort girls and escort agencies and find that they provide a valuable service that is in high demand. The problem with Craigslist was that the Adult section was being spammed a lot, many were posting 40 - 50 London Escorts massages per day to compete with one another!

    198. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off it. You know the cider house rules? Assholes like you are the reason these women suffer unregulated working conditions, and the abuse of pimps.

      Quit pretending you're on the humanitarian side and recognize that making a market illegal doesn't make it less prevalent. It just strengthens the prison industrial complex and exacerbates the hazards of those working in the industry.

      People are going to find it more efficient to seek biochemical rewards to feed their human instincts via prostitution and drugs. Not even a police state can stop that. It can just punish those who it catches to give the self righteous a sense of moral superiority and satisfy their moralist dogma.

      It really bugs some people to see the diversity of life choices that come with freedom. Fascist pig fuckers. All of them.

    199. Re:oh darn by martyngold · · Score: 0

      I work with escort girls and escort agencies and find that they provide a valuable service that is in high demand. The problem with Craigslist was that the Adult section was being spammed a lot, many were posting 40 - 50 London Escorts massages per day to compete with one another!

    200. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't kid your self that you are doing a poor Thai women a favour by buying her services - she is most likely a prostitute due to extreme poverty, and would much rather be in a normal relationship, and hold down a normal job

      Whoops, you almost had me going there for a second until I read: "...and hold down a normal job"

      There are career oriented women, but I'd like to see the ratio. If they can't fall into a dream job then they don't want to work.

    201. Re:oh darn by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      I have not read any evidence that a majority of prostitutes work because they enjoy being prostitutes. Have you?

      As the other poster replied, that same argument could be applied to any job. Do the majority of sanitation workers enjoy handling waste and filth? Or do they do it because it is a paying job?

      Stop being a "prostitution is no initiation of force therefore it should be legal therefore it is OK" libertard and instead ask "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      Yes, it is moral, in general to pay for prostitutes. To not pay would be rape.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    202. Re:oh darn by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Consider this:
      If (many) guys would fuck ugly broads and not give a shit, it is reasonable the (many) women would do the same thing.

      Terms like "I went hoggin' last night!" etc. didn't come from nowhere. I would certainly fuck female losers for money (were I not happily married)
      since as a single guy I often tapped expendable women.

      So what? A guy shouldn't give a damn about that, nor should a woman. Sex is like language. It can express love, express lust, entertain, or mean nothing at all. The porn "blooper" shots of utterly bored performers are hilarious, and revealing.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    203. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But enjoying physically and psychologically harmful working conditions day after day and believing (correctly or otherwise) that there's no way out is likely more harmful than hearing one lie about how pretty your eyes are.

      Well, I'm not really going to argue with you there. However, like smoking, drinking and recreational drugs (same thing, really), gambling or any other vice, the reality is that a certain subset of the population (any population) is going to engage in them. They create the demand, it will never, ever go away, and every society has to decide how to deal with that. We, of all peoples on this planet, should understand that prohibiting that for which there is a significant demand doesn't work. Not with alcohol, not with pot, not with prostitution, and the more you try to use force to drive [insert 'undesirable' behavior here] from your society, the more problems you tend to create.

      So, you have to examine why a prostitute would be trapped, would be compelled to remain a hooker. I can tell you why: it's because the hypermoralistic types have prevented that woman from ever having a way out. If prostitution were legal and heavily-regulated as it is in some other countries, that probably wouldn't be the case. It would just be another a new job classification under existing labor laws, and the same protections afforded to every other worker would be available to your local hooker. An entire legion of bureaucrats would have to be hired to enforce those laws. Right now, a prostitute (who may very well not have entered the oldest profession willingly) is squeezed between the hoods that run the operation, and cops who have no particular mandate to help her because she's a criminal. Let more legitimate business interests run the trade ("Remember the HP Lay") and that issue will become moot. Hell, I would expect the formation of the USW (United Sex Workers) Union at some point.

      True morality involves looking at the big picture, getting past one's own attitudes and doing what is right, not what feels right. Contrary to popular belief, those two are frequently in opposition. Don't think like some religious leaders who feel that dispensing condoms to teenagers is wrong because it "sends the wrong message." Sorry Reverend, those kids couldn't care less about your message, but if you give them proper advice and the right tools they may manage to survive to adulthood and become productive members of society.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    204. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok...so I've known a lot of prostitutes. Not just as a customer, but also many just as close friends. This includes US prossies and those in places like Thailand.

      MANY prostitutes choose their profession because the enjoyment vs. monetary reward is so high. Some love to have sex a lot and don't even care that much about the money, others may not like sex that much but still think it's well worth the payoff, etc., etc. I would say that for most of them, it's not that they lack other opportunities. Many of them are, believe it or not, actually a lot smarter, better-educated, and more-skilled than the average women living around them. They choose their profession because it beats the hell out of working in a more respectable field where they're likely to be underpaid. Even the least skilled of them is usually good-looking enough to be hired as a waitress or some other unskilled labor.

      But they choose to be prostitutes because they feel it's a better life FOR THEM. Maybe not for you, but it's their life.

      In the US, you'd be shocked to find out how many college-educated or otherwise successful women dabble in a little "escorting" on the side. I dated one of these women. She was brilliant and about to complete her masters in biochemistry. Really didn't need the money at all, but enjoyed accumulating so much of it nonetheless. Loved sex, and mostly did it for the thrill. Money was #2 on the motivation scale. This I know.

      The real problem with prostitution is those who get forced into it against their will, or who may enter the business voluntarily, but then get taken advantage of by immoral pimps and abusive customers. Also, underage girls should of course not be allowed to prostitute themselves out, regardless of how much they might want to. ALL of these problems would be greatly reduced and simplified if we regulated, licensed, tested, and legalized prostitution. People wouldn't turn to places like Craigslist so often to meet them because there would be plenty of regulated, established businesses they could instead visit.

      So yeah this post will be anonymous ;)

    205. Re:oh darn by torkus · · Score: 1

      More open or safe compared to what? Standing on a street corner? I might disagree.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    206. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I'm sort of wondering how this can be insightful. Is it being honest but naive? Is it sarcastic?

      If you don't think a pimp can drag an unwilling female around the country and advertise her services on Craigslist that's pretty naive. But then you seem to be a European so naivete, willful ignorance, and overlooking atrocities are par for the course.

      Well, I think yoiu're confusing the moderator's stupidity with the poster's intent. Personally, I would've modded him "funny". and not bothered to insult him.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    207. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Stop forcing YOUR morality on others. It's a choice, both by the service provider, and by the customer

      IF it's a choice on the part of the sex worker, then I agree. But under the current anti-prostitution regulations we have, it quite frequently isn't. The only way to make sure that women are a. in it for the money because they want to be and b. aren't horribly abused in the process is ... make it legal. Put prostitutes under the labor law umbrella, and hire the requisite bureaucracy to enforce those laws for the hooker's benefit. Then let them organize, form their own unions if they want, and ply their trade free of the general nastiness they have to suffer now.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    208. Re:oh darn by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      You can't equate prostitution with serving fast food.

      I take it you haven't had one of those KFC "Double Down" things. Jack cheese and bacon sandwiched between two breaded and deep fried chicken tits? Dude. Orgasmic and deadly.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    209. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Of course, some people mature from their early 20s sex-insanity, realize that sex isn't everything, and then actually love the person they get married to, and have a nice life after that.

      True. But it's also true that many don't. They just don't, they'll never have anything resembling a "normal" relationship and probably shouldn't even try. So far as I'm concerned, a thriving, legitimate prostitution industry would keep them happy, and furthermore keep them from competing for those nice women that those of us who did grow up are trying to find.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    210. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Also, many johns and drug buyers are now caught in asset forfeiture nets if they use a car, cell phone, or some other piece of easily seizable property to commit the illegal act. That helps pay for the extra cops and corrections officers.

      Yeah, RICO Act stuff. Nasty-ass law, really, it is. And it's being applied to otherwise law-abiding citizens. The Feds have agents combing law-enforcement records looking for "asset forfeiture opportunities." Some years ago a couple who discovered their own son growing a pot plant turned him in to the local cops, basically to teach him a lesson. He got a wrist slap and that was that, or so they thought. A Fed got hold of that information and got everything they owned, house, bank accounts, everything, seized under RICO. That's just wrong. I never followed up on that to see if they ever got any redress, but the whole point of asset forfeiture is to prevent the "accused" (and I use the term loosely here) from having the resources to fight back. I hate to use the term "unAmerican" because it has so many other connotations, but if ever there was such a thing this is it.

      The evil part of this is that the local cops are often given a cut of the take (that may sound like I'm calling it graft, but that's about how I feel about it) so they have no incentive to stand up for their own citizens.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    211. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Odd. I wonder what would happen to my income if it was illegal for my customers to pay for my services.

      Well, probably you'd either have to a. find another line of work or b. get a pimp.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    212. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Put up or shut up. "Look, I don't need to explain myself, I'm an expert and you're a cretin" is below your usual standards. If you are an expert then we lurkers on the thread would like to hear your reasoning, expertly-drawn historical case studies included.

      Oh, cut the guy some slack for Chrissakes. You admit he's pretty good, and want to pick on him for one annoyed post. Even the experts get irritated by hecklers now and then.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    213. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      You're part of the problem - judging people and actions you have zero familiarity with and then suggesting laws or rules to govern it.

      Newton barely left Cambridge yet profitably used astronomical data gathered from around the Old and New World. I've never strangled a man to death for my sexual gratification while performing analingus on a pregnant ewe yet I would dare to question the man who does either (well, from behind a sufficiently strong separating wall, anyway).

      I guess I'm no Newton, but at least I know how to think about something without experiencing it directly. I guess I evolved into a human at some point.

    214. Re:oh darn by JM78 · · Score: 0

      ...this will clog up the casual encounters section...

      Great point! Cause it's not completely overrun by spammers already as it is *rolls eyes*

      --
      I am Jack's smirking revenge.
    215. Re:oh darn by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. They rat out their son to the cops for growing a little pot (like maybe getting a criminal record is just a teensy little thing) and they wind up losing everything. So now they're wiped out and the kid's inheritance is gone. Yup, that really taught him a lesson.

      I'm sorry for the kid, not them.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    216. Re:oh darn by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      I knew a crack whore that has since quit. And she misses the money and job freedom more than the crack. Pretty sure she wasn't what you'd call a high class escort. AND that is with it being illegal. If it were legal and crack weren't involved I'm certain she'd be at it until she was 50.

    217. Re:oh darn by JM78 · · Score: 1

      ...and instead ask "Is it moral in general to pay for prostitutes?"

      Ok. No. It's not.

      Prostitution is most often a choice. People have the right to make their own decisions. Forced prostitution is illegal servitude (prostitution is a symptom of the actual issue) and should be dealt with as such.

      There are so many Moral Avengers in our society it sickens me. Let people do what they want to do in the privacy of their own homes. As long as people are not depriving others of their constitutionally-given rights the rest of us have no damn business telling them what they can and cannot do - if anything, that infringes on THEIR rights. Morality, religious or otherwise, is as broad as the number of individual interpretations and should not be used as the basis for laws which infringe on an individuals right to choose for themselves.

      --
      I am Jack's smirking revenge.
    218. Re:oh darn by moortak · · Score: 1

      You know, I worked food service for a few years and while I certainly caught a few colds I can't honestly say that the chance to catch HIV or Hepatitis ever arose from my work. Sure, out of work activities carried all of their usual risk, but I never remember bodily fluid transfer being a part of any recipe I worked with.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    219. Re:oh darn by cowdung · · Score: 1

      People also forget that in today's world more and more people are being FORCED into prostitution. Girls (also in some cases boys/men) are routinely kidnapped or fooled all around the world, then smuggled against their will and FORCED to engage in prostitution. How do they force them? Repeated rape, physical torture, intimidation, drugging them, etc..

      It isn't pretty.

      Oh.. and yes.. Europe and the United States are some of the main places where these victims are being bought and sold like cattle.

    220. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll be interesting to see you justify a single assertion in that post without resorting to religious arguments, or without projecting your own personal moral hangups on the rest of humanity as a whole.

      Here's the justification: Your assumption about migla's posts requires that the person doing the screwing is completely devoid of said religion-driven guilt, feeling of conscience, or even the ability to link sex to a genuine emotional bond that may not be there - subconsciously or not. That's not the case. Therefore, religious and/or emotional effects from casual or professional sex MUST be understood and accepted, not just ignored because your mores don't match others' mores...

    221. Re:oh darn by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Essentially you're positing that a world where not everyone has unlimited resources is a world without upsides as the economic struggle turns everyone into soulless monsters.

      Not really, I'm positing that there's more important ways to select a sexual mate than financial prowess. Some of these girls are quite well-paid. Once you've paid the bills you have no excuse except that you like getting paid for what people who are capable of forming healthy relationships, or indeed even just having sex for pleasure, get for free. I don't think that doing it necessarily makes you a bad person, but I don't think it ever says anything good about a person when they go beyond what is necessary for survival. I do think that there's a lot of cases where it is an evil act, but not simply because it is prostitution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    222. Re:oh darn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That isn't what I am saying. Consider an example someone else mentioned, that of the soldier. Most people who see major combat end up with some psychological damage. The military spends a great deal of time and effort trying to help its soldiers deal with what they have to experience. There is also a very real risk of being killed or severely injured.

      As such going to war should not be taken lightly. We should do everything we can to avoid putting people in that situation because we know that no matter what we do bad things will probably happen to them. It's a last resort because only a direct threat to our freedom is enough to warrant putting soldiers in that position. Well, it should be.

      On the other hand working on a deep sea oil rig is dangerous and isolating. Fortunately there are things we can do to mitigate those problems. Sure, it still commands a higher wage and benefits but running a safe rig where regular communications and entertainment help prevent isolation is a reasonable and attainable goal so we strive towards it because oil is very valuable to us.

      My point is that I don't think it is possible for the majority of prostitutes to live and work in a safe environment where they will not suffer grievous physical or mental harm even if you regulate the industry. The benefits of men being able to pay for sex and for some women to willingly choose prostitution as an occupation do not outweigh the harm done to the majority IMHO.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    223. Re:oh darn by moortak · · Score: 1
      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    224. Re:oh darn by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I introduced an idea which seems to be catching on (it was probably "invented" by several other people about the same time).

      You request a particular term or fact in the subject of the return email.

      Like.. "Put a kind of sausage and bun food in the header to show you are real".

      And of course anything that refers you to another web site is going to be trash.

      But I've had good luck with this when I tried it from m4w (zero luck in w4m).

      I have looked at mw4m and got some interesting email chains but nothing panned out mostly because I couldn't drop what I was doing and head over right that second (apparently when couples decide to go for it, they want to close the deal fast).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    225. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Knee-jerk. Arguing that funding the prostitution industry may be immoral is not forcing anything.

      Passing laws that allow police officers to legally point guns at you to arrest you for seeking out sex IS forcing something.

      You can argue all you want until you're blue in the face, but you will never be able to justify laws that jail nonviolent citizens for victimless crimes.

    226. Re:oh darn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      People can wear hazmat suits when working with sewage. You can get safe saws which stop when in contact with skin, you can make work environments safe from industrial accidents. Vets are a tricky one because the suicide rate is abnormally high despite mental health advances. The point is that all of these jobs have a realistic chance of being made safe so that people doing them don't suffer unnecessarily.

      No-one has yet come up with a way to do that for prostitutes, even when they are regulated. Some manage it but the majority don't.

      Anyway, ask any of the charities working with sex workers and they will tell you that the majority of people don't want to do it, but end up forced into it because it pays better than minimum wage and they have other problems in their lives that make it impossible for them to get a normal job. Drug addiction is common but simple poverty is a factor too. Regulation tends not to help those people much as regulated brothels have overheads that push prices up beyond what an less than good-looking and possibly unhealthy girl can charge. Also most jurisdictions require prostitutes to get help for addiction and take regular STD tests which will exclude many. There is also the issue of women being transported, sometimes under-age, into a country just to be sex workers. When you can't even speak the local language it is hard to get your rights respected.

      Legalisation is not the solution. Fixing the things that drive people into prostitution is. Maybe have the police turn a blind eye to high class escorts but legalisation only makes it harder for them to deal with the criminals who try to hide behind an air of legitimacy. Running a legal brothel is a good way to find clients for your illegal imports.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    227. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you think the latter two points are at least partially because it's illegal?

    228. Re:oh darn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm only talking about those who prostitute themselves for economic reasons.

      So it's okay for poor people to feel they have to do a really horrible job because it pays better than minimum wage? Call me a socialist but I'd say that we probably need to look at minimum wage and things like social housing rather than just legalising prostitution.

      Like many others you miss the point that all the jobs you mention can be made safe relatively easily. Some protective clothing, some training, some safety harnesses, a well design workshop/factory, safer tools etc. MacDonalds isn't actually that bad either. It has a bad rep but it is safe, clean environment where you can work flexible hours. Even if regulated that wouldn't be the case for the majority of prostitutes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    229. Re:oh darn by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      Or friends who will take a tenner and give you a BJ.

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    230. Re:oh darn by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I wonder what would happen if you got a man and a woman prostitute and asked them to fuck each other while you watched? would that be legal? what if I have a camera, video or otherwise?

      Reminds me of something I heard somewhere.

      If you're looking for a hooker, instead of asking for sex, ask if you can take pictures of them naked, as there's no law* against that and an undercover cop likely won't agree to it.

      *Obviously depends on whatever jurisdiction you're in at the time, much as your loophole does.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    231. Re:oh darn by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Just keep in mind there are a lot of male (homosexual and straight) prostitutes these days.

      Would they prefer to be a doctor? Sure.

      Do they want to do the work to be one? No.

      It is moral for rich people to have mistresses who don't have jobs.
      It is moral for less rich people to have mistresses and girlfriends who don't have jobs.
      It is moral to pay $175 for a fine dinner on a date with a girl.
      It is moral to buy a nice ring or dress or take a girl on a ski trip with you.

      And have sex with them.

      But it's not moral to directly give them money for the sex.
      But you can give them money for their rent and then have sex with them.

      ---

      I find most moral rules have a real reason why they were made. We fear mice in the southwest because of hanta virus.

      I suspect societies which are against prostitution did better over time than societies which had prostitution and so their moral laws are the ones we live by (and many other societies which were cool with prostitution didn't flourish and so we don't live by their moral laws).

      It could be that when you are having sex with 10 people a day, you cause disease to spread much easier.
      It could be it destroys marriages and that really hurts the kids.

      Speculation on my part.

      But we allow all kinds of prostitution just short of actually giving them money and having sex with them for an hour and then leaving.
      Some prostitutes are basically slaves- even in the U.S. And some prostitutes are pretty girls who think they can do this for a few years and get rich and then not do it. In my experience (with three of them), they couldn't. You can't fuck hundreds of people and then settle down and be a soccer mom. They all settled down, became soccer moms, and then started having affairs. Because their husbands couldn't keep up with their sex drives, because they loved the feeling of power over men who desperately wanted sex with them (unlike their husbands), because they liked the dinners and gifts those guys got them. One of them still drifts in and out of my life and she pushes my buttons at will but it would really mess up my social group if I ever acted on it. But we have a lot of fun flirting extremely hard without crossing that line.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    232. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. They rat out their son to the cops for growing a little pot (like maybe getting a criminal record is just a teensy little thing) and they wind up losing everything. So now they're wiped out and the kid's inheritance is gone. Yup, that really taught him a lesson.

      I'm sorry for the kid, not them.

      Huh? Don't jump to conclusions. Like I said, he got a slap on the wrist from local law enforcement. From what I remember of the story, the son was mentally-handicapped, the parents knew the cops involved and just wanted him to understand the risks he was taking. It was just their bad luck that some Federal-level vampire happened to pick up on the story. So yeah, I do feel sorry for parents who tried to do the right thing by their child, and got fucked over by the FBI. Hell, even the local cops (who certainly could have been assholes and busted the kid and his parents) went along with it and tried to help them.

      Sometimes applying the full force of a law (especially a law so ripe for abuse as RICO) is just unrestrained brutality that serves no purpose whatsoever. I'm sorry you can't see that.

    233. Re:oh darn by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      I'm also down with the prostitution. I just wish it was better regulated and taxed. I don't like to see crime involving that sector. Same with weed. Legalize it to keep it a regulated substance instead of causing all the crime surrounding it due to it being illegal.

      --
      Balderdash!
    234. Re:oh darn by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      From the ads in our houston press and in craigslist before it went dark, I think rates are dropping.

      Even if they had stayed at $200, that would have been a drop since 2000 but the ads were getting down to $120 to $160. I don't know if they upsell you after you are there but it seems like a glut of prostitutes on the market is having the expected capitalist effect.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    235. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      how you think morals are formed

      "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" is a good starting point. The golden rule has been around longer than pretty much every surviving religion, and can be traced back in written form to Hammurabi's "do unto others as they did to you" Code, though the concept of retribution almost certainly predates even that.

      There are other good tests too. "What would happen if everyone did this?" "Does this act require the use of force?" etc.

      All sin lines in hurting other people unnecessarily --- Robert A. Heinlein

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    236. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I did not click Post Anonymously.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    237. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude- that is an argument not a fact. How is being told day after day how pretty your eyes are psychologically traumatizing? What kind of screwed up person are you? It amazes me how cruel and messed up the average person is. You don't force other people to do things and you don't restrain them from doing things either unless they are harming another. There is zero evidence that prostitution is causing any harm. You can put out many if any examples where someone was supposedly harmed by prostitution. Sexually transmitted diseases are where the harm begins and ends. The problem with all of harm examples is they never have anything to do with the act of prostitution itself. It always has to do with something unrelated. The isn't there without a pre-disposed condition. If the person isn't already psychologically disturbed they wouldn't be traumatized by prostitution. It is merely an act of pleasure. Is it any surprise that people who are psychologically messed up get into prostitution? Probably not. That doesn't mean there is anything wrong with prostitution. Should you need a license to prostitute? Maybe that argument could be made. That's as far as I'd go. There are allot of messed up soles wondering the earth. Look at all the churches we have. If we didn't have so many messed up people there wouldn't be any churches or religions.

    238. Re:oh darn by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

      The casual encounters section is more clogged up by spam from webcam pay sites, from what I've noticed.

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    239. Re:oh darn by flyneye · · Score: 1

      U.S. military law, which he is answerable to, being government property and all, is far more severe generally than laws for citizens of the several states.
      I understand the military prison at Leavenworth still hangs the condemned.Maybe he'll get that.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    240. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you are letting the old lard-arse sweat all over you and put his dick in your purity hole?

    241. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually believe the shite that you are spouting, or are you trolling? The vast majority of prostitution is born out of poverty and desperation, not because the prostitutes love sex. And if you think those girls in the gogo clubs come to talk to you because they like you, well, they're prostitutes, they're doing what they do, and you're deluded. There are few things more pathetic than seeing some rich guy being fawned over by a desperate girl in a sleazy bar.

    242. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But enjoying physically and psychologically harmful working conditions day after day and believing (correctly or otherwise) that there's no way out is likely more harmful than hearing one lie about how pretty your eyes are.

      You're just an asshole.

      You're ok with a girl growing up and banging strange men because they tell her "one lie about how pretty [her] eyes are". She's getting emotionally damaged too, but that's ok with you because no money exchanged hands.

      You say you're ok with "mutually honest one night stands". What the fuck do you think prostitution is!? My mistake earlier, you're not just an asshole you're actually a hypocritical asshole.

      All your arguments about "they're in unsafe situations just for the money" can be applied to many professions. The world is not a utopia, in fact it is often a dangerous and unkind place. Should we stop people from becoming police officers because for many it is they endure "physically and psychologically harmful working conditions day after day and believing (correctly or otherwise) that there's no way out"?

      After reading several of your comments, I really despise you. You think that dishonesty is better than honesty, just because honest work doesn't match your predetermined morals. You think prostitution is inherently dangerous, but you're more mad about the girls and johns than the pimps. You're completely uninvolved with the situation, but you seem to want to impose your morals on others.

      Go fuck yourself. (But don't pay for it.)

    243. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is one of the simplest and best arguments that I've ever heard on this topic.

    244. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. Either way, it doesn't belong in the law books.

    245. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sleeping with some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real date because you need the money has no psychological ramifications?

      How is that different from feeding some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real meal because you need the money?

      Well, for one thing, if you were only feeding the lard-arse, there'd be less chance of getting squished.

    246. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Healthy human relationships are continually symbiotic, not about paying to seduce a woman and then crying because she doesn't give you what you want.

      What do healthy relationships have to do with johns visiting hookers? Sometimes people just need to get their rocks off and don't have 6 months to develop a relationship the way you do.

      Do you think masturbation is immoral as it provides a type of sexual release without being accompanied by a healthy relationship? If not, why is it immoral for some other consenting adult to assist your goal? There is no dishonesty, there is no inherent victim. There is a contract and a fulfillment.

      Can you argue why the core issue is immoral without using unrelated arguments about working conditions?

    247. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Anyway, ask any of the charities working with sex workers and they will tell you that the majority of people don't want to do it

      The majority of the prostitutes who have contact with charities don't want to do it.

      In other news, water contains high levels of hydrogen. Ric has more at 11.

    248. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      It's not as if Craigslist did anything to make it 'more open' or safer, the worse that could happen is that they'll use some other site to connect to 'clients'.

      No, what will happen is that they'll use several other sites, ones that fly under the radar of the state Nannies General. If the state actually does want to police online escort services, their job just became that much harder.

    249. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      How are the realities of an industry orthogonal?

      Because those realities aren't part the "industry," but rather consequences of the industry's underground nature.

      I'll keep hammering on my original point because it really is as simple as that: how many McDonald's employees were press-ganged by Russian mobsters?

    250. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      and yet despite that plenty of timber cutters still get crushed or mortally injured.
      Fishermen still get washed overboard or die of hypothermia before they can be pulled out of the water or reach a medical facility.
      Pilots still die in crashes and receive unhealthy doses of radiation(if you know how to shield a high altitude plane please speak up).
      Metal workers still get burned or die from fume inhalation.
      Roofers still fall.
      Electricians still get electrocuted.
      Farmers still get caught on machinery and killed or maimed.

      Should we ban Timber cutting because the men who work in the profession are apparently too inept to decide what risks they're willing to take themselves?

      In most of those professions there are safety precautions you can take yet most of them remain damned dangerous in the real world.

      "The point is that all of these jobs have a realistic chance of being made safe so that people doing them don't suffer unnecessarily."

      not really. I imagine that in america the land of litigation the pressure to make the aforementioned workplaces safe is huge and yet they're still dangerous jobs which kill a lot of people each year.
      And some of those jobs don't even pay very well.

      "Anyway, ask any of the charities working with sex workers and they will tell you that the majority of people don't want to do it"

      Ask people in almost any dirty unpleasant job and you'll find most of them don't want to do it but end up forced into it because it pays better than minimum wage and they have other problems in their lives.
      That's pretty much the reason why anyone gets any job at all.

      "There is also the issue of women being transported, sometimes under-age, into a country just to be sex workers. When you can't even speak the local language it is hard to get your rights respected."

      Which has sweet fuck all to do with legalizing prostitution.
      people are imported and forced to work as slave labour in factories in many places around the world but that has sweet fuck all to do with legal, regulated, paid work doing similar jobs.

      "Regulation tends not to help those people much as regulated brothels have overheads that push prices up beyond what an less than good-looking and possibly unhealthy girl can charge."

      Regulation does that to other industries.
      It forces out those who are least suited to the industry and those who are not safe in the industry.

      "Also most jurisdictions require prostitutes to get help for addiction and take regular STD tests which will exclude many."

      Wow, you say that like it's a bad thing.

      regulating it helps to improve peoples lives ,gets them off drugs and requires them to get STD tests.
      wow, how awful.

      Legalisation vastly superior to illegal prostitution.
      If we could fix the things that drove people into prostitution we would have already.
      Poverty, drug abuse and plain old wanting money for things are not problems that are going to go away in any kind of reasonable timeframe.

      "Running a legal brothel is a good way to find clients for your illegal imports."

      Kinda like how my local tobacconist sells heroin and meth in the back room... oh wait, no he doesn't.

    251. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's nothing inherent in the sex act that makes it more emotionally damaging than other acts; that's all in your head, based on your society's enforced rules.

      OOI, do you deny all applications of the scientific method or just psychology?

    252. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Y'know I didn't even notice the selection bias there until you pointed it out.

    253. Re:oh darn by Open4D · · Score: 1

      Sleeping with some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real date ...

      Though of course, not everyone who can't get a real date is a disgusting old lard-arse.

      An interesting angle on this debate is one that has received coverage in the UK recently: disabled people using prostitutes. There was a sympathetic (but pay walled) article in the Sunday Times recently:

      "Some disabled people are cut off not only from sex but from any kind of gentle touch. People whose disabilities have prevented others ever being attracted to them are painfully conscious of the raw judgments of the sexual marketplace. ... It is impossible to read some of the joyous, grateful accounts of people who have just had sex for the first time without feeling that simplistic judgments about the evils of prostitution are an inadequate response to this need. A man who cannot talk wrote thankfully about his wonderment at not being made to feel awkward or stupid; another said his escort was gentle, intuitive and trying hard to make the whole experience special. In this surprising world, their pride is often matched by the prostitutes’ agencies, some of which advertise themselves as “being able to provide a genuine unhurried caring service for our disabled clients”."

    254. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      "My point is that I don't think it is possible for the majority of prostitutes to live and work in a safe environment where they will not suffer grievous physical or mental harm even if you regulate the industry. The benefits of men being able to pay for sex and for some women to willingly choose prostitution as an occupation do not outweigh the harm done to the majority IMHO."

      So you're not really interested in actual sensible measures of harm but rather the simple fact that you arbitrarily decide that a particular type of service(anything sex related) is virtually worthless and anything to do with the sex industry to be utterly harmful to it's workers.

      "My point is that I don't think it is possible for the majority of prostitutes to live and work in a safe environment where they will not suffer grievous physical or mental harm even if you regulate the industry. "

      So instead of the majority of them working in regulated brothels with security and a controlled environment and regular STD tests(also giving an even stronger incentive to take as many measures as possible to remain STD free) it should be unregulated and they can all work out on the street.
      Fantastic idea.

      Because all you a achieve by making it illegal is to make the working conditions worse.
      (any making yourself feel better of course since you also make it less visible so you don't have to think about it)
      If we could fix the problems that drive people into prostitution we would have long ago.
      But poverty, drug abuse and plain old wanting a job with high pay and short hours are not things which are going to go away within our lifetimes.

    255. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I guess I evolved into a human at some point."

      Based on your other closed-minded posts in this discussion, I'd say this statement is debatable.

    256. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      "can be made safe relatively easily."

      and yet are not.
      Legal brothels can have STD testing, enforced condom use, security services, enforced counselling for drug use or other psychological problems.
      And best of all if it's legal then the brothels can be held liable for on the job injuries or infections like any other employer.

      Clean? no, flexible hours and reasonable safety? absolutely.

      but you go on with trying to section off anything to do with sex and other sinful things and pretending it's special and different from other jobs because sex is involved.

    257. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      You're very angry for someone having a detached, disinterested argument on the Internet. Or maybe you're neither detached nor disinterested? :-)

      You're ok with a girl growing up and banging strange men because they tell her

      I'm not OK with it at all. If you read my posts you'll see I said precisely the opposite.

      You say you're ok with "mutually honest one night stands". What the fuck do you think prostitution is!?

      Prostitution = regularly, for money;
      Honest one night stand = when desired, for mujtual enjoyment of sex.

      Should we stop people from becoming police officers because for many it is they endure "physically and psychologically harmful working conditions day after day and believing (correctly or otherwise) that there's no way out"?

      No police officer should continually endure physically and psychologically harmful working conditions. He should be regularly evaluated to ensure this. And no man who believes he has no choice but to work as a police officer should be allowed to wear the badge in the first place.

      After reading several of your comments, I really despise you.

      You're slightly annoyed with my posts - as annoyed as anyone on a random Internet forum should get - so you've fashioned a reply into that of a hyperbolic troll. You've ensured to click Post Anonymously because you're slightly ashamed of yourself: you know you don't have a sound counterargument to the nuances of the problem so you substitute with vitriol.

      You think prostitution is inherently dangerous, but you're more mad about the girls and johns than the pimps.

      Not really mad about the girls. I haven't talked about the pimps at all. Perhaps they can drag up and blow the johns? They deserve each other.

      You're completely uninvolved with the situation, but you seem to want to impose your morals on others.

      Lower the blinds, we're going through Black Country! You're trying to absolve yourself of your part in society by pretending that other people's problems are so none of your business that it would actually be immoral to help them.

    258. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      The way to help those women is to offer them treatment for their drug addiction, not make their profession illegal.

    259. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing dismemberment, downing or burning to death trapped in a car didn't feature heavily either yet those are very real risks for people working in the very legal areas of timber cutting, fishing or taxi driving.
      And doctors and nurses have to wear a lot of protective equipment as bodily fluids are a very significant part of their work.

    260. Re:oh darn by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

      I made no judgments about the state of the world or what is OK versus what is not OK. I am pointing out the state of things now. I did not "miss the point" that jobs can be made safer, I gave an example of one which I've had that, as the world exists right now, involves a similar level of danger. There are plenty of others.

      "Some protective clothing, some training, some safety harnesses, a well design workshop/factory, safer tools etc."

      Most of that is mandated by OSHA. That doesn't mean that the safety standards are followed. This is reality. It sucks, but it's common for safety procedures to be ignored by companies trying to save money, or by employees who are lazy, too cool for safety equipment, or just plain stupid. Their stupid decisions can kill and injure you through no fault of your own without any intentional malice. A broken condom could kill you, except the condom has a higher percentage rate of safety and HIV infection rate isn't 100% even without any protection. You risk injury either way. Personally, I'd rather contract herpes than have my hand cut off. Many people would rather fuck 10 strangers for a half hour in a week than flip burgers for 40 hours, or work in a cube farm, or audition for a part in a movie. If they earn a living at it and aren't compelled by physical or mental force to do so, that's their choice.

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    261. Re:oh darn by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      The majority of the prostitutes who have contact with charities don't want to do it.

      What's your argument, exactly? Perhaps that no charity involved in helping sex workers has ever employed one person who has done a first year course in statistics, so they have no clue how to obtain a representative sample?

    262. Re:oh darn by eulernet · · Score: 1

      I had one of my co-workers, who openly bragged about having sex with prostitutes or engaging in relations with south-american women, and I was always asking myself why he did that.

      My wife simply told me that he was very ugly (which I didn't mind, since I'm not interested in men).

      So, yes, there are people that have problems finding women, and prostitution is probably their only way to have sex.

    263. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      The principal reason prostitution is illegal in most rich Western countries is due to the exploitation of minors.

      In places like New Zealand, where prostitution is formally legal for "adults" over the age of 18, and in Thailand, where the de facto law is that prostitution of all kinds is legal, children, particularly those under 16, are unwilling members of the sex trade.

      Prostitution is illegal principally because often, one of the two parties involved doesn't or can't consent.

      There are plenty of jobs that have a similar list of risks.

      There are people in this world who as part of their jobs have to spend all day surounded [sic] by human faces working sewer maintainance [sic] with all the dangers of infections that entails.

      How is that different from feeding some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real meal because you need the money?

      It's not about the risks involved. People consent to risky jobs. However, children *cannot* consent. It's disputable if even the majority of 18 year old prostitutes in New Zealand, let alone Thailand or the Netherlands or any number of token countries, consented to entering the sex trade. Sex slavery can start as soon as a girl turns 13; just because she turns 18, and is now "legal," doesn't mean she consented to the last 5 years of prostitution, and can't be said in any reasonable circumstances to suddenly have the ability to consent arbitrarily at age 18.

      My point is legalizing prostitution is very easy, and so is evaluating the risk of a given occupation. On those grounds we have a lot of important laws that compromise between the needs and wants of individuals, corporations, states and peoples. On the other hand, enforcing the rules of consent is very, very difficult. If it weren't, we wouldn't have child prostitution all over the world, present even in Western countries.

      Consent is a key problem behind a lot of interesting laws that defy a typical logical unwinding. Polygamy is illegal in most of the world while homosexuality is not largely because polygamy almost always involves the marriage of adult men to multiple underage girls—why do you think that compound in Texas got raided recently? Indeed, most marriage and statutory rape laws protect children because, in spite of token and unimportant exceptions, children don't consent. They simply can't.

      Consent, consent, consent. Kids can't consent. Most women in prostitution don't. And law enforcement is ill equipped to recognize consensual versus nonconsensual prostitution. Be realistic.

    264. Re:oh darn by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1
      You're feeding the urban legend, or as one commenter says:

      I am having some difficulty in believing that we all read the same 58 page report. Let's just look at the facts. Police went to 142 premises and interviewed 254 people who sold sex, of whom 210 (83%) were migrants. They scored the interviews on a variety of markers of vulnerability. They rated 24 of the sample (9%) as showing some signs of exploitation, and classified this as trafficked. They did not find any 'slaves'. The rest is speculation.

    265. Re:oh darn by DaleSwanson · · Score: 1
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_the_United_States_military

      There have been no military executions since 1961 although the death penalty is still a possible punishment for several crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

    266. Re:oh darn by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      I CAN see that, actually, and the federal law is obviously ripe for abuse. It always has been, and there was never any doubt, as far as I'm concerned, that it would be abused.

      However, I absolutely don't agree that turning your kid in to the cops over something so trivial as a couple of pot plants is ever justified. If the locals agreed to go along this time, that just means the parents rolled the dice and got lucky. There's absolutely no way they could have known they'd get that result. Example: a woman I know called the police after driving off a rapist as he tried to force his way in through her bedroom window. She was bleeding from where he tore a hunk of hair out of her head, cut on the arms from a knife, and shivering with terror. When the cops arrived, they busted her for a roach they found in her ash tray. So don't lecture me about helpful cops. You call them when you really, really have to...and hope for the best.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    267. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      Neither would prostitutes if the job was legal and qualified for police protection just like every other day job.

      In fact you and your fucked up holier-than-thou moral code are the reason girls get beaten up and raped while working as prostitutes. Does that make you feel proud of yourself?

    268. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      And then there are some of us who get married, love the person we married, and we both like to have a little fun on the side.

      Why should my wife and I have to scour through what are likely thousands of closed minded people who aren't interested in being our third when it would be far simpler to just look through a book of prostitutes, find one we think is attractive and just pay them to be there.

    269. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      Propose a way to prevent children from being exploited, practically.

      From an empirical point of view, legal prostitution (in places like New Zealand and the Netherlands, and in de fact legal places like Thailand) involves a disproportionate exploitation of underage girls, who can't consent. The government cares about those people.

      Relatively few adults are getting picked up for illegal prostitution in the United States, the largest "garrison state" in the world. For all intents and purposes, prostitution is legal, and the government isn't saying when and why two consenting adults can have sex.

      On the other hand, the government also understands consent is hard to prove and hard to enforce. Polygamy is illegal because polygamy as its practiced (not as hypothesized) almost always involves the marriage of adult men to underage girls. Homosexuality is not illegal (distinct from gay marriage) because rarely does a homosexual partnership involve an non-consenting partner.

      Prostitution is illegal because (empirically speaking) it almost always involves an adult man paying a third party for the privilege of exploiting a non-consenting woman or underage girl. Pimping is obviously already illegal, and pimps go to jail. But just because you make it illegal doesn't make them go away.

      We recognize that prostitution as a transaction, not evil people or poverty or whatever, generates non-consensual exploitation of underprivileged parties. That is a unequivocal social wrong. Therefore prostitution, in most of the sane rich Western world, is illegal.

    270. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      That is a fair point, people who are pushing the "sex is bad" moral outrage always seem to decide that the services of the sex industry are of zero value to society.
      But I'd ask how many people who for one reason or another find it hard to establish relationships be it due to disability, deformity or simple social awkwardness don't swallow the contents of their medicine cabinet thanks to the occasional services of a prostitute.

      A real loving relationship is preferable and more fulfilling but counter to fairy-tales not everyone gets to have those.

      Simply touching and being touched by another human being now and then can do wonders for your state of mind.
      I've never reached the point where I wanted to go out and hire someone for sex but if I hadn't found myself a girlfriend and for one reason or another had ended up with no realistic prospect of significant human contact I can see how utterly crushing loneliness could have become.
      And friendly hugs don't fix some kinds of loneliness.

    271. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      My argument is that your argument is just another variation on the arguments that got us into Prohibition. "Because a subset of consumers can't handle their alcohol, nobody gets to drink a beer after work."

      It is not the role of the government to tell consenting adults what they can do. (And I don't want to hear about slavery and human trafficking and all that crap. Slaves are not consenting adults.)

    272. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      You're a horrible, terrible, mean person, and stupid to boot. Dangerous conditions for prostitutes are precisely because it's illegal. How many times does it have to be said for your tiny little brain to wrap around that fact? If it were a legal job most of those problems would vanish.

    273. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount you pay for each of the above options (hooker, one-night stand, girlfriend and wife) is probably proportional to the likelihood of successfully reproducing with them. Sex has a goal after all, even if it is subconscious.

    274. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...justify a single assertion in that post without resorting to religious arguments... or your own personal moral hangups

      In a standard labor market, where fast food workers and fast food companies participate, there's consent. A fast food worker consents to working a shitty job, and one man's "working a shitty job" is another man's "exploitation." It doesn't matter. There's consent.

      In the prostitution labor market, there are ordinary women, underage girls, children and adults bonded in the sex trade or sex slavery, pimps and their ilk, and clients. Underage girls and bonded women (unwilling members of the sex trade) do not consent to their work.

      It's *entirely* an empirical question, not a moral or religious question, to evaluate the legality of prostitution: what proportion of this labor market actually consents to participating? Slavery is illegal because 0% of the workers consent; that's easy.

      So what's the tolerance? How do you compute these values? It doesn't matter in this example whether or not prostitution is legal, mind you—it's legal and illegal in lots of places, and in all those places there are underage girls forced into prostitution. Enforcement may bring the proportion of non-consenting participants down, but economists will tell you that prostitution has a *structural* percentage of non-consenting participants, exactly equal to the demand for young women. The demand for young women is unfortunately very high.

      We don't need religious arguments to define exploitation. Paying someone to have sex with a minor is the exploitation of that minor. Period, full-stop. We can derive notions of exploitation from either a libertarian or Rawlsian notion of consent, which has no basis in religion.

      So I dissent: no amount of regulation and "above-boardedness" will reduce the structural demand for underage girls. Prostitution as a transaction, by facilitating or abetting the exploitation of non-consenting individuals, should be illegal.

      At least you know why in most of the rich, industrialized, liberal democratic world, prostitution is illegal.

    275. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself you judgmental, Christian piece of shit. Morality is absolutely subjective. Just because you have a pole jammed up your rectum doesn't mean the rest of the human race has to be abide by your fucked up world view.

    276. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      Slavery is an example where 100% of the employees in a labor market do not consent to participating in the labor market. Prostitution is an example where, depending on whom you ask etc., 10% to 100% of the employees in a labor market do not consent to participating in the labor market.

      Slavery is not orthogonal to the question of whether prostitution should be legalized. If slavery is illegal, we agree that people should consent to the jobs that they work in. Since a significant proportion, in my opinion, of underage girls, bonded women etc. do not consent to participating in the prostitution labor market, I'd feel prostitution should be illegal on the same grounds I'd feel slavery should be illegal.

      I think the point about illegal immigration is similar, in that there's an issue of consent when you can take your employees hostage by threatening them with deportation. It's an important principle behind the equal protection clause: women don't consent to being women (and being able to menstruate and get pregnant); ethnic minorities don't consent to being ethnic minorities (they're born east Asian, hispanic, the descendents of slaves...). It's all about consent; there's no consent to working if you're threatened with deportation.*

      *This is distinct from committing any other crime, because while a citizen can vote for what is and is not a crime, an illegal cannot. And if you don't have money to leave, or face sure imprisonment if you don't, it doesn't matter if you're "illegal," your situation reduces to slavery. That's why the issue of migrant workers is not orthogonal to slavery is not orthogonal to prostitution.

    277. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to say "go back to bed honey, the adults are talking", but actually you've posted enough in this thread that you don't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Of course it sounds weird, the cost analysis on marriage was pretty obviously a joke. WHOOSH

      I submit, though, that if you can't see the components of your relationships -- the give-and-take of companionship, sex, money sharing, shared living, etc. -- it's you that's missing something. Try to get out of your head and see past your emotions and the social conventions you grew up with. Yes, some girls are that materialistic, and some guys are that mercenary, although both are usually at least a little subtle about it.

      But really, have you even thought about what it means that for a substantial fraction of the world's population (the majority, maybe?) arranged marriages are the norm, or at least accepted and common? Or that some cultures have radically different ideas about what marriage means? I'll spell it out for you: the idea that "a progression of a friendship into a kissy relationship into a fully sexual relationship" is the normal, right way to do things is hopelessly naive. Good for you that you've been lucky enough not to have to think about what you wanted, but that's not even usually how it works.

      Not everyone gets a happily-ever-after. It's just not possible: some people are too ugly or too broken to attract the person they want, or want something they can't have (cf. the millions of bachelor men and lesbians in China who won't ever find someone to be with because there just aren't enough women).

      And, "perhaps they need a fuck buddy"? Thank you, captain obvious! Never would have thought of that solution.

      One last thing. As far as I can tell, the idea that selling sex is impermissible is rooted in the religious belief that sex outside marriage will result in your eternal damnation. If you accept that premise, it's obvious that women should not be allowed to sell themselves.

      On the other hand, if you don't believe that, what's the reasoning? People work at all sorts of hazardous jobs. When we find out that a job is hazardous we regulate the working conditions, we don't just outlaw it.

      And don't tell me that prostitution doesn't advance us. If prostitution doesn't, neither does any of the entertainment industry -- might as well outlaw video games! Why would you let anyone get paid to perform daredevil stunts? Way too dangerous!

    278. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      All work is free choice to the extent that you also have the options to lie down on the streets and starve

      You don't have to go that far at all. Slavery is work that is plainly not one's "free choice;" it has less to do with this objectivist notion of survival and much more to do with our notions of consent.

      Many women, underage children and others in prostitution do not consent to be prostitutes. The fraction of prostitutes who don't consent is significant enough to make prostitution illegal. End of story. It's an empirical question answered every day by the preponderance of child prostitutes in New Zealand (where it's legal), and as many as 10% of all prostitutes in the United Kingdom (where it's illegal).

    279. Re:oh darn by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe is goes like this: "Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why is selling fucking legal?"

      --
      "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
    280. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      Why make slave owners criminals just because slaves are already in a fucked up situation?

      It has nothing to do with desperation. Liberal progressive democracies have already figured out how to deal with desperation: the right to food, shelter, minimal healthcare and other civil rights.

      One of those remaining civil rights is consent, which is the real problem. Just like slaves don't consent to slavery, many women don't consent to prostitution. The fraction of prostitutes who do consent and the cost we incur because of them is entirely an empirical question. Some figures in the comments say 10% of all UK prostitutes are slaves (clearly non-consenting), which excludes a vast proportion for whom the binary evaluation of consent is unfitting and complicated.

      For me, since the cost of having slaves of any kind is unlimited, prostitution, as long as the fraction of non-consenting participants isn't zero, should be illegal.

      This is why it's easy to let miners kill themselves in mines: they consented to mining, basically all of them in the United States. But many women, children always, do not consent to prostitution.

      And since outlawing something does not stop it, outlawing underage girls (who cannot under any circumstances consent) from participating in a legal prostitution labor market doesn't stop them from participating. In fact, it's quite a problem in New Zealand, where prostitution is legal for those over 18, even though too many sex tourists come for girls much younger.

    281. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      The practical constraints of law enforcement favor some cases but not most. Maybe in Sweden it's not so bad. In eastern Europe, Africa and most of Asia, there's no apparatus to judge or enforce legal prostitution between two consenting adults versus illegal prostitution between a client and an non-consenting underage girl or bonded adult woman.

      Even in the garrison state of the United States, there exists human trafficking. So there *is* no "handling by the police and other governmental authorities." That just doesn't happen.

      While there is much to be gained from protecting consenting adults from indirect problems in the prostitution market (like clients screwing their prostitutes), legal prostitution increases the number of non-consenting participants. Thailand and New Zealand have many more child prostitutes and non-consenting adult prostitutes than the UK, and the UK has 10% "sex slaves" (by some figures in this forum). Legal prostitution adds a sufficient number of non-consenting participants that the gains from protecting consenting adults is dwarfed by losses from more children and sex slaves in the system.

      It's an empirical question. In my opinion, any number of slaves in a labor market should make that labor illegal. That seems like a reasonable opinion.

    282. Re:oh darn by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In the prostitution labor market, there are ordinary women, underage girls, children and adults bonded in the sex trade or sex slavery, pimps and their ilk, and clients. Underage girls and bonded women (unwilling members of the sex trade) do not consent to their work.

      I'm sorry. Can you save me the trouble of reading through all that wharrrgarbl, and explain, in five words or less, who is arguing for the legalization of slavery?

    283. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      Absolutely no one, I hope. But since there's a demand for underage girls, there's always a fraction of prostitutes who are underage (criminal prostitution). They don't (can't) consent, just like slaves.

      This is a structural criminality to prostitution, which regulation can't do anything about (unlike, say, clients who don't pay their prostitutes, which isn't structural).

      So since this kind of criminality is structural, and we assume that legalizing prostitution doesn't decrease the size of the prostitution labor market, we get more underage prostitutes, absolutely. That's equivalent to getting more slaves—neither slaves nor underage prostitutes consent to what they do.

      I think slavery is unlimitedly wrong; I also believe that regulation occurs regardless of legalization. To you it may be an empirical question: do the benefits of more regulation due to legalization outweigh the costs of more child prostitutes? As long as child prostitution is structural, that's unlikely to occur.

    284. Re:oh darn by Klinky · · Score: 1

      Besides the risk of STDs & possible violence, there is probably a mental toll. Of course there is a mental toll for someone who is in a dead end job going nowhere as well...

      A lot of jobs are unhealthy, working on an oil rig with petroleum & noxious gasses flying around is also unhealthy. Being in the military is 'unhealthy'.

      Of course this all depends on the person & their circumstances. People can get themselves out of fast-food limbo & move on with their life. Some people do prostitution for a few years and then move on as well, no worse for wear. Ultimately my point was that neither profession can accurately be stated as being healthier than the other, they both carry risks & have demands that can take their toll.

    285. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in this particular case, no psychologist {{citation needed}} will argue that the effect of fucking 50 strangers a day is generally as benign as serving 50 burgers a day. But are you arguing that, and what is your extraordinary evidence?

    286. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been happening for decades, swingers for some reason are on an uptick during the recession, dangerous times to be promiscuous.

    287. Re:oh darn by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      Also how come porn is legal then, people are having sex for money there as well, but the difference is both are getting paid by a third party, and there is a camera.

      Dude, you just summed up something I've wondered for a while.

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    288. Re:oh darn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "That's why it made much more sense to have a separate section for it."

      May people do not know this, but that's exactly WHY a separate section was created for it. It wasn't always there. There were a lot of complaints that "inappropriate" posts were made in other sections... often sections that children might access. (Sometimes the ads used "code words" that fooled nobody.) So a separate area was made for those activities.

      Removing this section is going to do no good for anybody. It will simply force ads back into the other categories, and again there will be more ads that children might run across. Further, eliminating the section will do absolutely nothing to reduce or eliminate the "criminal" activity that was being advertised. It will just again be forced underground, where it will be harder to catch the people doing it. And in the vast majority of cases, in which nobody is being abused, why would you want to catch them anyway? Turning people who are just trying to make a living into criminals is one of the modern-day psychoses inflicting this country.

    289. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      How about this simple argument: if person A wants to fuck person B, and person B wants to pay them to do it, who the fuck are you to tell them that they're not allowed to?

      Yes. Most people want sex more than they want alcohol, I'd say, and remember what happened the last time we tried to ban that.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    290. Re:oh darn by CarlosM7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (Hint - guys, she's DOESN'T like you.)

      * So that's why some (granted, *very* few, but the number is still non-zero) of them stop whatever they are doing and jump to me to hug me and kiss me the very moment I step in the establishment.

      * One of them asked me to take her home, and then wanted to do me, *no* charge. She even at one point danced for me, knowing that I already had run out of money, and just threw a napkin to her pile of cash, so to make the other patrons believe that I tipped her.

      Some of them actually enjoy "serving" some of their *paying* customers, and some times, well, they have to eat and pay their bills, so they *have* to ask their customers for money, no matter how much they like them.

    291. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... WHAT? You think selling someone a hamburger is the same level of interaction as having sex with them?

    292. Re:oh darn by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Alcohol isnt the same. Achohol isnt going to change the love dynamic of humanity, or the decency of humanity. It can lead to interesting situations of course :) but... It is just an object, where as with prostitution, the object becomes a human being, and it changes our way of looking at each other.

      For example, you go and ask a woman out, she says no... she thinks your too fat....

      Instead of walking away, you say... how about $500 to just fuck you, you dumb whore?

      Everyones going to expect a fuck price out of each other.

      Of course the reality is now, that woman just want money... as do men... but at least we're still trying to keep some kind of decency up....

      But I am for legalized prostitution. I'm not against it.... I just think that it would change society greatly. You would have 50 year old men offering poor 17+ year old highschool girls, $1000s to fuck them.

      It would get very strange.

    293. Re:oh darn by CarlosM7 · · Score: 1

      How is that different from feeding some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real meal because you need the money?

      A friend of mine once told me that she was asked to take care of elderly people, she would need to feed them, clean their (you know what), etc, and was expected to do all this for even less than the federal minimum.

      May be we really should be outlawing those jobs too?

    294. Re:oh darn by CarlosM7 · · Score: 1

      Some of the prostitutes I have met beg to differ, they rather do prostitution than work for a fast food (granted, not all, but still).

    295. Re:oh darn by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Going on the assumption that you're male, I hope you do understand that sex is the goal of EVERYTHING that you do.

      I disagree. There are many examples of people doing things with no regard for sex.

      Just one example: A man heroically dives on top of a live grenade. dies, but ends up saving his platoon..

      There are things that motivate some people that go beyond sex.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    296. Re:oh darn by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      > playing the pseudo-libertarian "no physical force => legal => moral" card.

      At least that "pseudo-libertarian" concept is defined.

      We are all waiting for you to define "morality"

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    297. Re:oh darn by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      "I've not considered having sex a goal"

      Going on the assumption that you're male, I hope you do understand that sex is the goal of EVERYTHING that you do. It was one of Freud's basic pleasure principles. Sure the guy may have been coked up, but he did have some pretty good insights into the human psych.

      We also all have an ego and superego to balance out the pleasure principle. I know you're being funny, but the whole sex-is-life meme really grates on my nerves. Men, maybe American men in particular, seem to enjoy claiming they have no control over their sexuality. I'm sure it's hooked into the US repressive sexuality thing, but it bugs the hell out of me.

      Sorry, minor rant. I vote yes on legal, regulated, and taxed prostitution. It's the rational and ethically correct course. Incidentally, that's what I think about cannabis production too, take the money out of Mexico and give it to grandma and grandpa sun-closet.

      I'm not optimistic about getting these things adopted any time soon here (U.S.), but it sure would be a big boost to local economies.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    298. Re:oh darn by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Holier-than-thou? I was arguing in another thread how the world would be better off without religion and I believe in abortion. Maybe you live in a nice little suburb where all the hookers are $1000 a night escorts but I live in the real world where girls sell themselves not to make a lot of money but to make just enough money for that next hit of their drug of choice. Do you really think most girls hook just for the cash? Hell no most were forced into it or did to support there habit. What makes you think legalizing it is going to help the girls that do it for the drugs. Ever heard or a crackwhore? Its not something to just call your friend's mom its a real thing. I'm not talking about the Red Light District or the Bordellos out in Nevada I'm talking about the everyday real hookers the ones that get taken out to the woods or in a back alley. Legal or not do you really think the police would give a damn? Hell they don't give a shit about the homeless and there is nothing illegal about that. I'm sorry I don't see the world through your rose-colored glasses but when you could pay the girl in cash or drugs it doesn't matter how legal hooking is. Oh one more thing prostitution is a night job not a day job.

    299. Re:oh darn by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, no. Alcohol behaves exactly the same, just in a slightly different context. People don't take alcohol being legal as a sign that it's a good idea to start binge drinking during breakfast and in most places where guns are legal it's neither allowed not considered courteous to randomly shoot people in the head. Likewise people wouldn't take legalized prostitution as a sign that everyone is a hooker.

      Of course that's my observation over here. Maybe alcohol is part of a balanced breakfast where you're from, in which case I'd avoid people bearing guns.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    300. Re:oh darn by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Dude if it's like that you're better off going to swinger parties. More fun and not as expensive.

      --
      Qxe4
    301. Re:oh darn by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      It's an empirical question. In my opinion, any number of slaves in a labor market should make that labor illegal. That seems like a reasonable opinion.

      So, no more cotton picking? Or is that ok now that we're able to control it and ensure that workers are not slaves?

      The issue of human slavery in a labor market is a different issue from making that labor entirely illegal.

      I personally think that Vice Squad should be rounding up people abusing children and non-consenting adults rather than abusing consenting adults.

      Some politicians are bad people, and corrupt, should we outlaw all politics? Construction is highly dangerous and results in numerous deaths every year, should we issue a decree from on high that no one can actually consent to such an action? Boxing is a brutal sport that injures and kills as well... should we decry this, and declare it an unconscionable act as well?

      Or should we put in place guidelines, enforcement and protections upon any and all employers to treat their employees fairly and reasonably?

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    302. Re:oh darn by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Newton barely left Cambridge yet profitably used astronomical data gathered from around the Old and New World.

      I should just leave you to the mods, but...

      Newton studied astronomy in Cambridge. He didn't put on a blindfold and guess about what the sky might look like. If you have no direct information about a topic, you are not in a position to have an authentic opinion.

      I know how to think about something without experiencing it directly. I guess I evolved into a human at some point.

      I'm sorry that you see someone advocating for informed opinions and take away the feeling that you are being called subhuman. I don't think that was the intent.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    303. Re:oh darn by ghetto2ivy · · Score: 1

      Casual encoutners wasn't nearly as overrun (so I hear) before the adult services section came about, because in adult services you had to pay to post. Spammers, most just moved to the free portions. Whats not being said is how stupid this is! For adult services you had an audit trail -- a credit card -- that could be tracked to each post. Now kill that and you mvoe them to the non paid sites where you lose that bit of identification.

    304. Re:oh darn by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      I mean make it safe and legal.

      Indeed! Hear, hear. To paraphrase former U.S. President Bill Clinton, it should be safe, legal, and common.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    305. Re:oh darn by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      The adult services section was in place for a long time before they started charging for it. They were pressured to charge for it by the very same people who have now pressured them to get rid of it.

      The adult services section was originally created in order to stop that kind of traffic from flooding the other categories. That's a historical fact.

    306. Re:oh darn by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      The issue is more with the potential for exploitation. I mean, sure there's a woman who may want some money and agree to suck a dick for $300. But then you do have prostitutes exploited by their pimps, or forced into it by their partners, or even parents. And then there's also concerns over spread of diseases and stuff. You need some level of regulation.

      The other thing is...a street prostitute is probably fucked up for life. I mean, there's a difference between some highly paid escort who gets paid well, treated with some level of respect and works with more respectable levels of society, to some desperate gutter whore who goes with any guy, who potentially will beat her as well, gets mistreated and not paid as well. It does fuck you up.

    307. Re:oh darn by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      No one has ever been emotionally scarred for life by TIG welding. If you are going to relate sex and coal mining then the next step is 'rape is just being in someone's mine illegally'.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    308. Re:oh darn by eclectro · · Score: 1

      who the fuck are you to tell them that they're not allowed to?

      The father of underage girls that don't want it happening to their daughters? Oh, that's right, there never were any sex ads on Craigslist.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    309. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no way they could have known they'd get that result.

      I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. These people apparently knew the cops, and got the result they wanted ... a wrist slap. The cops just did them a favor, no big deal, and that was the end of the matter so far as local law enforcement was concerned. Nobody got busted. I know what you're trying to say, but it doesn't apply in this case.

      The point I'm making is that the Feds got wind of this (I think from a news report) and saw an opportunity to make some money by abusing (and I mean, seriously abusing) the RICO Act. Those people were no more drug dealers than I am (or you probably are, for that matter), did not get anything resembling due process, likely never got their day in court. They just lost everything, all for trying to teach their retarded kid something. It's sickening. The FBI agent who did this should have been fired and forced to make restitution.

      All that over one marijuana plant.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    310. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about the "possible violence" is that it's a lot less likely if prostitution is legalized. The reason being that, at present, if a prostitute is attacked or raped by a client most places in the US, she won't go to the police because, even if they do go after the client, they will also quite happily lock her up too. The same is true for crime in the other direction. I even remember it on an episode of _Cops_. A truck driver called the police because a prostitute stole his wallet, possibly over a payment amount dispute, and the police just ended up arresting everyone, witnesses included I believe. Just like with prohibition of alcohol in early part of last century and of all kinds of drugs today, prostitution goes on, entirely unabated by the law, but the black market nature of the work rather than anything inherent in the activity of sex for money itself creates most of the so called evils associated with it.

    311. Re:oh darn by randyleepublic · · Score: 0

      Oops, strawman! "fucking 50 strangers a day is generally as benign as serving 50 burgers a day"

      You know what you did there, don't you?

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    312. Re:oh darn by thunderclap · · Score: 2, Funny

      sex as a job si fine if it is like Nevada. heavily regulated. Lets add video to it and it becomes p0rn.

    313. Re:oh darn by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      "Laws too severe are seldom obeyed" -Franklin

      If too many people want to do something you can't stop them even if they don't have majority of the vote (and I bet when they did many would not be bright enough to vote for it-- it takes a super majority.)

      I've had friends equate other items with money they gave to dates where they were only interested in sex with the woman. They didn't see it as paying for sex because they worked a bit for a few dates (maybe had fun too) and spent about as much money either way. The lying / misleading they did to get what they want seemed ok/necessary to them and that is where I objected to it - they didn't see what was wrong with it on the grounds "everybody else does it." Yet they would find moral objections to prostitution when that doesn't make them act dishonest.

      If you legalized drugs you would likely cut down on the bad parts of prostitution, perhaps lower it a little bit.

      I could go further to some my divorced friends who kept up a pretense for too long and after marriage dropped it... ending the marriage rather quickly. Although, in this case sex wasn't the sole motivation but it was similar in that they "bought" love in the same way they found sex...

    314. Re:oh darn by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Sleeping with some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real date because you need the money has no psychological ramifications?

      No worse than what a nurse's aide has to deal with.

    315. Re:oh darn by moortak · · Score: 1

      I'm not denying that plenty of legal professions have significant risks. I'm just saying that listing HIV and Hepatitis as risks of food service is silly.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    316. Re:oh darn by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      The girl on the street corner, versus the girl with an escort ad is only a difference in their advertising medium.

      The girl on the street corner has a pimp around the corner who owns her. How common is that for someone advertising on Craigslist?

    317. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hint - guys, she's DOESN'T like you

      You must be a woman. This is the argument they always make. No guy I know goes to a strip club looking for a relationship. They go to see naked women and fantasize. The pretend intimacy bullshit that strippers do is part of the game and every guy knows it. When I try to explain this to women, they look at me with bewilderment because they don't understand the importance of visual stimulation to a guy. They seem to only understand emotional stimulation and think we buy into stripper act as real rather than as part of the act.

    318. Re:oh darn by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      The only thing I disagree with in all you wrote concerns the local police. If you personally know your local cop, and he agrees to cut you a special deal...fabulous. Not much to do with people being equal before the law, but fabulous. But the key here is that the FBI couldn't have known about this unless the cops in question made it official and somebody started talking about it. This wasn't just a friendly "drop by and scare the idiot kid" thing. There had to have been paperwork (for the "wrist slap"), and probably some media coverage, and that allowed things to proceed to the next level. My point, which I'm not sure you're getting, is that matters like this one should be dealt with inside the family. When you bring in the authorities, you're asking for trouble. Walking around a golf course during a serious thunderstorm doesn't mean you're going to get hit by lightning, but it certainly tilts the odds just a little in favour of you making an appearance in the Darwin Awards. "Yea, he was using his one iron...and people used to say even god couldn't hit a one iron" (Clubhouse laughter).

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    319. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      We tried that and it's more trouble than it's worth. It's too much like dating. We're not looking for all that drama, we just want to have fun.

    320. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      So is stocking the shelves at WalMart, and how often to you hear of those employees getting dragged to the woods and killed?

      You're just going to have to face the fact that you're wrong and it's your moralistic assholes who are making the problems worse.

    321. Re:oh darn by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Unfortunately, it's the same way with so many "illegal" industries. Prostitutes can go to work, get the crap beat out of them, robbed, etc, etc, and can't report it to the police to investigate. Soft drug dealers are in the same situation. Imagine the phone call "I was delivering a bag of pot, and got robbed at gunpoint." You'd go to jail just for admitting that you had possession with intent to distribute. Replace "bag of pot" with "pizza", and the police would handle it like a real crime.

          Criminalization of things that really shouldn't be criminalized only serves to put those who participate in those activities in danger.

          Marijuana has only been a crime in the US for less than a century.

          Prostitution became illegal in the US for just about a century, depending on which state you are in.

          There are exceptions to both, depending on where you live, and how the laws are enforced. Some jurisdictions overlook either (or both) activities, because locally they are considered acceptable. In cases where the crime itself is overlooked, I'm sure if an offense like I mentioned in the first paragraph was committed, the victim would be encouraged to rephrase their statement to eliminate the illegal activity which they were committing when it happened.

          I was very surprised when I was in the Toronto area a few years ago, and found that prostitution was perfectly accepted. As I understood it, they didn't want "street walkers", but any activity that happened in the privacy of your own bedroom between two consenting adults was accepted. Way to go! that attitude made me consider wanting to live there, but the LCBO seemed very wrong. I wasn't interested in seeing escorts up there, but I did like to drink in my free time, and didn't feel comfortable going to the state run liquor stores.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    322. Re:oh darn by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      You've posted this bullshit multiple times. How many times does it have to be said: prostitution entices would be slavers specifically because the industry has been pushed underground due to it's illegality.

    323. Re:oh darn by wmac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you. If there was a rule and it was legal, at least gangs, pimps, cruel and wild men could not abuse and hurt poor ones working for money.

    324. Re:oh darn by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      as if serving fast food doesn't carry any risks. it's low-wage work, and you also get to eat the fast food. yuck.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    325. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This really should be obvious on Slashdot, where half of us would rather code than have sex :)

      Wait, we have a choice?

    326. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of things are shitty things to do. Paying people minimum wage to flip burgers, to use the example already given, is a shitty thing to do. Driving around and polluting the environment with the filth spewing from its tailpipe is a "shitty" thing to do. Killing and eating animals is probably a pretty "shitty" thing to do. Being involved with prostitution may be a "shitty" thing to do.

      That doesn't mean it should be illegal.

      You can dislike prostitution all you like, but if adults A and B agree to exchange sex for money that's their business, *not* yours, and *not* the government's.

    327. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      sorry about that, the way slashdot displays replies to low rated comments threw me off. I didn't see what you were replying to.

    328. Re:oh darn by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      I agree with you.. but there is a subtle difference and I tried to illustrate that in my example.

      No one expects others to drink alcohol. Although some do.

      But with prostitution legal... I think people simply try to buy each other after being turned down. It doesnt mean the woman that rejected you would sell herself... but it means that people would probably expect everyone to have some kind of a fuck price. And it was also be harder to tell who was simply offering sex for money, versus who genuinely liked you.

      I agree with you that it can go either way, but I think there is another aspect to it because we're talking about humans and behavior... selling behavior, and expectations of each other and how we will change our way of looking at each other.

      I dont look at people who drink and say they're bad people (unless they harm someone)... but I would probably look at a woman as a piece of shit, if she refused to go out on a legit date, but then offered to fuck me for money.

      So I think it brings a different social dynamic to life that we might not like.

      I say this all while in support of legalizing prostitution strangely.. but i think like everything... there comes consequences, some unintended.

    329. Re:oh darn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Okay, can you say precisely what these sensible measures of harm you are talking about are?

      Also you seem to be missing my point about not legalising it. I'm not saying that the current situation is ideal either, just that trying to regulate it by making it legal is unlikely to improve things. I am also not saying that we can make it go away as you seem to think I am. I'm just being pragmatic.

      It is a lot like addictive drug use. Sure, you could legalise heroin and try to regulate its use but that is unlikely to help people who steal to feed their habit. A better option would be to try to help those people get off it and re-build their lives while targeting the dealers who push it in the first place. In the same way you try to help the women involved in prostitution and go after the pimps.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    330. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. There are many examples of people doing things with no regard for sex.

      Just one example: A man heroically dives on top of a live grenade. dies, but ends up saving his platoon..

      There are things that motivate some people that go beyond sex.

      Sounds like a grenade fetish to me

    331. Re:oh darn by ooshna · · Score: 1

      So is stocking the shelves at WalMart, and how often to you hear of those employees getting dragged to the woods and killed?

      How does stocking the shelves at Walmart have anything to do with what we are talking about. Stop taking shit out your ass and write something that is on the subject.

    332. Re:oh darn by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I got it out of the local paper. Local writer cracked the story.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    333. Re:oh darn by dontbgay · · Score: 1

      But enjoying physically and psychologically harmful working conditions day after day and believing (correctly or otherwise) that there's no way out is likely more harmful than hearing one lie about how pretty your eyes are.

      You think that's bad, join the military. Especially a rating or MOS you don't want to do. That's physically and psychologically harmful with no way out. Hell, the Thai women I met in the middle east were there on contract with their caretakers. Both are contractually obligated professions that some would deem unfit for human work. Who are you to judge?

      --
      Sig not found.
    334. Re:oh darn by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Again, I live in a country with legal prostitution and it just doesn't happen. Except maybe with extreme assholes who can't comprehend that there are women who aren't ready to spread their legs for them 24/7. Unsurprisingly, these people act like that everywhere on the world.

      Prostitute is a job. We don't assume that people who don't advertise having that job do have it, even if they're technically qualified. To use a simile: People don't assume that everyone with a bicycle is a courier even though for small deliveries they have everything they need to be one.

      Also note that casual prostitution may actually be made harder by legalization. So a woman does occasionally sell herself. Now she needs to declare that income on her tax report or commit tax fraud. Casual prostitution looks a bit different if you have to explain to the government where that extra money comes from - even with legal prostitution most people don't want to be associated with it, especially not officially. And depending on how regulated sex workers are in her jurisdiction she might then get hit with a penalty for workplace safety violations as she can't prove she passed the requisite health checks lately.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    335. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      "just that trying to regulate it by making it legal is unlikely to improve things."

      So government oversight, improved working conditions for the majority employed in the sector, legal liability for employers who fail to protect their employees, STD screening and counselling would in no way improve the lot of the average working prostitute?

      It's not an ideal profession but making it illegal simply makes the situation worse for the women involved.

      On the front of addictive drugs how's that approach working out?
      That's pretty much the approach they take it a lot of places.
      Drugs are still easily available to anyone with cash who wants them.
      People still steal to fun their habit.

    336. Re:oh darn by blue_teeth · · Score: 1

      There's one reason why some people call prostitution the oldest profession...

      Erm, second oldest profession. The oldest profession is hunting.

    337. Re:oh darn by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      But there's no such thing as a child in prostitution who isn't slave, right?

      That's my point. Some fraction of prostitutes will always be slaves, regardless of whether or not its legal or regulated, because children cannot consent to being prostitutes.

    338. Re:oh darn by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    339. Re:oh darn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You still seem to think that a lot of prostitutes do it because they want to. Ask any charity or law enforcement person who deals with them and they will tell you otherwise.

      It's the same with drug addiction. You could say that people take heroin by choice so why not legalise it and make it safer for them to do so? Actually most addicts do not want to be addicts as it tends to ruin your life, so the best thing to do is try to help (rather than punish) them and only go after the suppliers. The same approach works for prostitution.

      I don't know why you think that is the current situation for drug users because it isn't. Possession is currently illegal.

      Also, if you think regulation will prevent infections and health problems then you are mistaken. Hospitals go to great lengths to prevent the spread of infection and nurses are fairly safe because they don't come in to direct contact with infected patients and their bodily fluids (they use gloves and other protective equipment). Compare the infection rates of prostitutes in places where it is legal with nurses and you will find that nursing is a far safer profession.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    340. Re:oh darn by wrightrocket · · Score: 1

      They already are posting in the Therapeutic section, interfering with legitimate massage therapists ability to have their ads visible.

    341. Re:oh darn by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      There had to have been paperwork (for the "wrist slap"), and probably some media coverage, and that allowed things to proceed to the next level.

      Okay, I think we're in agreement then.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    342. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      It's also a far far far lower paid profession.

      "You still seem to think that a lot of prostitutes do it because they want to. Ask any charity or law enforcement person who deals with them and they will tell you otherwise."

      no I don't.
      I don't doubt that most of them would prefer to not do that job.
      The thing you keep on dismissing off hand over and over and over and replaying the same tired claim over and over and over is that the same thing goes for people in almost every single dirty unpleasant job.
      They don't like it, they would prefer not to do it, if they were not getting paid for it they wouldn't be doing it.

      but the money tends to be good so they do.
      People aren't addicted to being a prostitute.

      "Also, if you think regulation will prevent infections and health problems then you are mistaken. "

      If you think regulation prevents any kind of workplace injuries or dangers you'd be mistakem, all it can do, all it ever does in any profession anywhere is reduce injuries and other problems.
      Which is better than sticking your head in the sand and pretending that if you keep wishing real hard that the underlying problems in society will go away.

      "Compare the infection rates of prostitutes in places where it is legal with nurses and you will find that nursing is a far safer profession."

      Compare the infection rates of taxi drivers with nurses and you'll find that taxi driving is a far safer profession.
      (of course if you look at road deaths it swings back the other way.)
      And the point you keep ignoring is that the pay is also far far better.

      Sure a nurse probably has less than a (to pick a somewhat random guesstimate)tenth the chance of catching something deadly(unless there's some really contagious airborne virus going round) but they also earn less than a tenth as much per hour working.

      I don't know why you think that is the current situation for drug users because it isn't. Possession is currently illegal.

      there's more than your home town in the world.
      In some places police don't pay much attention to the addicts and focus on the dealers.

      Of course the more sensible thing to do would be to put the dealers out of business by providing addicts with free high quality drugs(cheap for a government vs the cost of problems addicts cause trying to pay for their addictions) and after a couple of years when the big dealers are well out of business gradually push the addicts into addiction counselling and treatment.
      Drug dealing is a business after all just like any other.

      How long does a normal business last when someone starts giving better merchandise away for free next door?

      It would of course be important to make sure addicts are not penalised for accepting free drugs.
      Eliminate the profit in getting people addicted and you'll see less addicts.

      (there's some interesting evidence based trials in London looking at an approach pretty similar to this, though focused on long term heroin addicts, free heroin on the condition of being a quiet non-destructive addict who doesn't steal things with arms of the trial looking at various incentive schemes)

      Also, particularly in the case of opiates, addicts can be fairly functional in normal life when they have access to sufficient supplies of opiates.

      On the other hand if you just arrest a dealer the dealer down the street will take over his customer base long before the first sees the inside of a courtroom.
      intercept a shipping container full of drugs and all you achieve is pushing up the price (and the number of car radios stolen) by a few percent that month.

      One point we can probably agree on is that the current system in much of the US where the addicts are simply punished severely is about the worst of all possible approaches.

    343. Re:oh darn by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You seem unable to accept that sex with strangers is generally preferable to most other shitty jobs for most people. Given the choice most prostitutes would rather do a dirty job that covered their outgoings, but for a variety of reasons they often don't have that option.

      I don't know why you can't see the difference between prostitution and other unpleasant jobs. It's part social, part psychological but you just can't equate being a nurse with being a prostitute. I don't think there is any more that I can say if you can't grasp that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    344. Re:oh darn by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      You won't get interesting conversation out of most bar girls in SE Asia. I presume Japanese girls are different (coming from the geisha heritage, which wasn't usually about sex, just companionship and conversation as you say).

      My girlfriend is from Thailand. She's not and has never been a bar girl or prostitute, but some of her friends ended up being in that position, and I know them. That's where girls end up if they don't do well in school, don't try to get more education, and don't want to (or can't) work on their parents' farm if they have one.

      They do it out of choice, to some extent, but the alternative is not getting a legitimate job. It's being extremely poor because they have no education. And while it seems casual to foreign tourists (as with the parent), it's really not as accepted in the culture as it seems and those girls are looked down upon as much or more than they would be in the west. Luckily for them, there are so many of them and such a large bar culture that they can basically ignore everyone else and be accepted (and make much more money than they could otherwise).

    345. Re:oh darn by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      And you can't seem to accept that for some people it really is just a job.

      I gather you belive sex is special in every way but not everyone considers it particularly special.

      I don't think there is any more that I can say if you can't grasp that.

      "Given the choice most prostitutes would rather do a dirty job that covered their outgoings, but for a variety of reasons they often don't have that option."

      And how does it being illegal help them in any way shape or form?
      Making it illegal only makes it worse for the women already in an unpleasant job.

    346. Re:oh darn by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      In Thailand, while in many cases there are actually alternatives, it's not really so much a choice thing. They're doing it of their own free will, but not because they want to - many lack education and don't realize that there might be a better way to live. It's an attractive, leisurely lifestyle involving a good amount of money (for Thailand anyway) and many see it as their only choice.

    347. Re:oh darn by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I posted something similar in reply to one of the other repliers but I was really aiming it at you, so I'll reiterate.

      My girlfriend is from Thailand. She's not and has never been a bar girl or prostitute, but some of her friends ended up being in that position, and I know them. That's where girls end up if they don't do well in school and aren't sure how to do anything else (besides living in poverty or working on their parents' farm or whatever if they have one).

      Anyway most bar girls do it because they feel as though they don't have any other choice. And as someone else said, they're acting 100% of the time, and from what I've seen they don't really do a good job.

      And bar girls "end up dating with you" usually not because they really like you. They've probably got a few other "boyfriends" at the same time. It's all about the money. It can happen that a bar girl will end up having an exclusive western boyfriend/husband eventually, but it's not very common and it's not initially about love or anything like that, at least not for the girl.

      Finally, western guys are "considered a huge score" because they're comparatively rich, and that's all. One of the problems is that most people who see them as a couple in public will assume it's a typical bar-girl-type fake relationship, not anything real.

    348. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's legal in New Zealand and I think it's working out. They are protected. Win Win.

    349. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Achievement unlocked: five strawmans in one post! You are doing super!

    350. Re:oh darn by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      True, girls do cost money, but the traditional route of buying them flowers, chocolate, and jewelry stimulates the economy. Paying the girl directly cuts out the middleman, plus most of them don't report the earned income on their taxes.

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    351. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "no psychologist will argue that the effect of fucking 50 strangers a day is generally as benign as serving 50 burgers a day. But are you arguing that, and what is your extraordinary evidence?"

      So you try to refute somebody's claim without evidence with a claim of your own without presenting evidence?

    352. Re:oh darn by Panruru · · Score: 1

      no psychologist will argue that the effect of fucking 50 strangers a day is generally as benign as serving 50 burgers a day

      That is a terrible comparison. Clearly, most prostitutes do not service fifty customers per day. At best that's an argument that unregulated prostitution is immoral, not prostitution as a whole.

      I know for a fact that some people really don't have a problem with working as a prostitute. There are, in fact, many people who can have sex without forming an emotional attachment, including both prostitutes and customers. I haven't yet seen you make a single good argument for why this is universally a bad thing.

      In any case, morality is all relative. That's why geeks don't try to apply the scientific method to such discussions: it's impossible, because there are no right or wrong answers. Any attempt to do so will ultimately just turn into an argument about semantics. And the opinions of the world's many hard working prostitutes aren't worth any less than yours.

      --
      "All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, and meaningless in another sense."
    353. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But people have been emotionally scarred by doing a lot of other things. Should we ban all of them, too?

      I was a Peace Corps volunteer. Have you ever been the only white guy in a city that decided to riot? Gone to work on a Monday morning, and had your building be overrun by mobs at noon? Been shouted at by people carrying machetes and burning cars, simply because you were a different color? It's been a couple years, and I still jump when I hear the roar of a crowd.

      The point is that everything has risks. I would much rather the risks be known and managed (i.e., the profession is legal) than have a desperate woman get trapped in a hell because lawmakers think if they make something illegal it will go away.

    354. Re:oh darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like any job, if you are not cut out for it, then don't do it, but don't make it illegal for people who are perfectly capable of doing it, "ramifications" and all.

      I worked in fast food for 2 year and it drove me into a deep depression. It got to the point where I walked in the door and felt a wave of depression hit me. I hated it and felt pathetic. And at $3.50 an hour, at the end of the pay week, another whammy.

    355. Re:oh darn by CarlosM7 · · Score: 1

      I forgot one point

      * There are the ones who end up marring one of their customers

    356. Re:oh darn by zeroshade · · Score: 1

      but there will always be customers who are all the more attracted to non-consensual sexual encounters because they are forbidden

      One does not have to actually have to force someone or cause trauma to have that "non-consensual sexual encounter" that they fantasize about. Many prostitutes are willing to roleplay the fantasies of people who want to have those types of sex. It'll cost them extra, but what's wrong with finding the prostitutes that are willing to fulfill that person's fantasy for money? I agree that it has been a last ditch profession for many women, but it is entirely possible for those who are willing to fulfill those dirty, dangerous, and brutal fantasies to do so without leading to the so-called darker side. Look at the S&M scene, while it doesn't have the actual intercourse (generally) you see all kinds of fantasies, role playing, etc. go on without the psychological and emotional trauma.

      The "dark side" of prostitution is completely able to be eradicated. Pursue those who sell women into slavery, mistreat them, force them into prostitution. But consensual prostitution (even if it is just a job the woman is willing to do because she is poor) should be completely legal. Legalizing it would definitely reduce the amount of human trafficking and other horribleness that goes on. It won't do away with it completely, obviously, but it would definitely reduce it.

    357. Re:oh darn by zeroshade · · Score: 1

      Any act that someone is forced to do can be emotionally/psychologically damaging. Any act that anyone does can be emotionally and psychologically difficult for some people and not for others. Not counting those who are forced into prostitution/slavery, I highly doubt that someone who decides to become a prostitute voluntarily (not being forced by any means) is someone who finds sex to be very emotionally intimate. Those who desire to be prostitutes for the money, just because they like sex, etc, are generally those people who see sex as just sex. Not as something more intimate and emotional.

      It's true that it's much more common to see sex as something that affects a person emotionally and pyschologically, but part of that is due to societal norms. There are people who find that the subservience they feel by being a fast food worker is psychologically damaging. Who find the entire environment to be emotionally degrading, etc. It's different for each person.

    358. Re:oh darn by alexo · · Score: 1

      You can't equate prostitution with serving fast food. The former carries all sorts of risks, even when it's a licensed and regulated brothel. You think every customer is going to have a HIV and STD test first? Condoms are 100% effective? Sleeping with some disgusting old lard-arse who could never get a real date because you need the money has no psychological ramifications?

      You are right, comparing prostitution to the fast food industry is wrong. Instead, let's compare prostitution to to social work / nursing.

      A friend of mine used to be one. Yes, she didn't sleep with "disgusting old lard-arses", she just fed them, cleaned them, changed their diapers and was regularly abused by them (verbally, psychologically and sometimes even physically -- dementia has a funny way of altering one's behaviour). There are differences of course: she had to get a diploma and pass tests, not to mention that she earned quite a bit less then a prostitute.

    359. Re:oh darn by giuda · · Score: 1

      the oldest profession for men

  2. And as we all know... by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Out of sight, out of mind.

    Clearly, Craigslist getting rid of their adult services section removes all such adult services from the rest of the Internet, and in fact, from existence itself.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    1. Re:And as we all know... by yincrash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      craigslist is the only adult services listing site that reports tips to the center for missing and exploited children. these listings are just going to go somewhere else that won't report any listings and will be harder for law enforcement to find.

    2. Re:And as we all know... by yincrash · · Score: 2, Informative

      citation http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201008310900 (jim buckmaster's assertion)

  3. WTF man by masmullin · · Score: 1

    I mean dude... my dick isn't gonna suck itself!

    1. Re:WTF man by ravenspear · · Score: 4, Funny

      You could post in M4M, you'll get plenty of offers.

    2. Re:WTF man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ravenspear speaks with such authority it's clear he has extensive experience in the area. ;)

      dude, you opened yourself up for that!

    3. Re:WTF man by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool story bro time.

      Several years ago, in my early twenties, myself and two friends went to New Orleans for Mardi Gras. Drinking in our hotel room before going out on Bourbon St, we thought, heh, lets post on Craigslist and see who is out there. So we posted in the mm4w section (use your imagination for what we wrote). I kid you not, within 30 seconds, we started receiving emails. The first one was from someone who wrote "Since its Mardi Gras, you boys should have no problem finding what you're looking for, but if you're looking for a late-40's tranny, you let me know".

      Scariest. Craigslist. Experience. Ever.

  4. slashdotters SOL by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    How are all us slashdotters supposed to find nude modelling gigs now?

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:slashdotters SOL by archmcd · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    2. Re:slashdotters SOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way they always do, via their telescopes and ham radios.

    3. Re:slashdotters SOL by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of plastic surgeons, liposuction clinics, and tanning salons who would pay then handsomely to model in some "BEFORE" pictures.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    4. Re:slashdotters SOL by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of plastic surgeons, liposuction clinics, and tanning salons who would pay then handsomely to model in some "BEFORE" pictures.

      Hey! I resemble that remark.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  5. backpage.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.backpage.com/classifieds/index. Like prostitution is going to go away. lol

  6. Idiots by BlueCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some politician says ban this section and it will all go away...

    Now the personals section is going to get even more polluted.

    Casual Encounters will become the new adult section but it will spill over into the normal sections. Strictly platonic will probably become the "normal" area. If this is the intelligence of state attorney generals then we must have a lot of innocent people in jail.

    1. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAH. "Normal"

    2. Re:Idiots by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Now the personals section is going to get even more polluted.

      And there is still the "therapeutic" services section (where legit massage ads belong).

      Users should follow the posted flagging/reporting instructions for things that don't belong.

    3. Re:Idiots by snowgirl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a lot of belief in politics that if we make something illegal, people will stop doing it.

      This idea is retarded, and recognizably inconsistent with reality.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    4. Re:Idiots by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of belief in politics that if we make something illegal, people will lose their cars to the law enforcement agency that catches them doing the illegal thing in their cars.

    5. Re:Idiots by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 0

      In his book SuperFreakanomics Steven Levitt deals with just this issue. It's actually an interesting read: if you outlaw being a prostitute there is no incentive for Johns to stop using a prostitute. To really outlaw this you'd need a form of enforcement that would stop the behavior (such as castration -- routinely find the johns and have them castrated.) In such a circumstance no one will use a prostitute. The really funny thing in their study though is prostitutes tend not to get arrested because usually they just turn a free trick for the arresting officer to get out of jail free.

    6. Re:Idiots by houghi · · Score: 1

      But it fills the private held jails. Capitalism in its best form.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:Idiots by airfoobar · · Score: 1

      This is the fault of grandstanding state attorneys, who are trying to make noise to get votes -- who should all just stfu and leave the internet alone.

      Not only are they politicians, they are lawyer politicians!

    8. Re:Idiots by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The actual logic is that if we make something legal, everyone will do it. And with this it becomes easy to understand the driving forces behind these laws.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    9. Re:Idiots by DaveGod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a lot of belief in politics that if we make something illegal, people will stop doing it.

      They are fully aware that this is not true; but stopping people doing it isn't the objective. That's not even close to being foremost on their minds. Politicians are driven by personal power and political motives. They want to be seen to be "doing something", "being tough" and "sending a strong message".

      Due to recent well covered events it's easier to demonstrate my point when discussing drugs. Whilst it obviously isn't the same issue, it's an area I think most people would agree that has many similar issues, is highly related and is subject to similar attitudes from politicians, the public and the media.

      Politicians have numerous advisers with a very solid understanding of the situation. However (at least here in the UK) when the experts give actual opinions based on expertise, they get sacked. Or they get frustrated by the sole political motivation and quit.

      Claudia Rubin from Release – a national centre of expertise on drugs and drugs law – said the expert should not have been penalised. "It's a real shame and a real indictment of the Government's refusal to take any proper advice on this subject," she said.

      Meanwhile we rely on unelected Lords for a bit of reason. The then (unelected) Science Minister reacted furiously:

      As science champion in Government' I can't just stand aside on this one.

      Prof Nutt (the guy who got sacked see above) himself wrote more recently:

      the niceties of legal process and proper procedure on drug classification are as nothing beside the media-driven political demand that something must be done, and done now.

      (I'll point out the sources above are across the political spectrum, as far as the broadsheets go the "Torygraph" is perhaps the furthest to the right and the Guardian furthest to the left; the Independent supposedly dead-centre but generally considered to be a lefty. The government they're all criticising was the centre-left Labour Party.)

    10. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you BlueCoder!!

      When is Obama going to learn to leave the internets alone!?!

      OBAMA !!!

    11. Re:Idiots by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Some politician says ban this section and it will all go away...

      Now the personals section is going to get even more polluted.

      Guess what's next on the chopping block. The "americans who believe that sex is unnatural and wrong yet somehow always have an assload of kids" lobby isn't exactly concerned with a clean personals section. At least, they won't admit to it.

    12. Re:Idiots by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Casual Encounters will become the new adult section but it will
      > spill over into the normal sections. Strictly platonic will probably
      > become the "normal" area.

      Then platonic will move into services, services will move into electronics, electronics will move into computers, WHERE WILL IT END?!?!? IT'S NOT TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    13. Re:Idiots by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      *nod nod* I see... the argument that you're making here is that, "Government isn't stupid. It's just 'evil'." (Evil in this case being relative.)

      I do like your argument, but you know, as with drugs, there are politicians here who are calling for legalization of at least pot... but then as groundswell comes up for an issue, it then starts to become politically acceptable to listen to the god-damned advisors, I suppose.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    14. Re:Idiots by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      In the real world, I think the politicians belief is: if we make something illegal, we can make a lot of money off of it.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    15. Re:Idiots by randyleepublic · · Score: 0

      >> we must have a lot of innocent people in jail.

      Believe me, we do!

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    16. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State attorney generals are POLITICIANS.

      Unless you are childishly naive, you would already know that means they
      have their own interests in mind, and that means they are willing to engage in
      grandstanding to garner points in the game of politics.

      Listen, most of the voting public are IDIOTS, and politicians pander to these idiots
      while knowing all the while exactly what is going on. It's how Bush and Cheney were able
      to get re-elected, it's why the scum who are behind the Tea Party are doing what they're doing
      with the aid of human waste like Glen Beck, and it's why the US is going to hell in a handbasket.
      Next time you see your idiot neighbor, thank him / her for being such an easily led mindless fuck.

  7. Consenting Adults by lwsimon · · Score: 1

    Tell me again who's the victim? I must have missed it. Is it the person getting paid, or the person getting their dick sucked?

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
    1. Re:Consenting Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The person that had to pay for drinks, a dinner, and a movie and didn't even get more than a peck on the cheak and an offer to do it again in a couple nights, in hope that you might get a proper kiss. A few weeks, a dozen hours or more, and a few hundred dollars, and they "might" get lucky...
       
        People like that hate the fact that someone can spend a fraction of that money for copious amounts of sex, and not have to have formed an emotional connection.... And the women like that hate it even more, because it really draws away from their bottom line... I mean dateability....
       
        One group hate that quick and easy solution they didn't think of first, and the other hates the compitition....

    2. Re:Consenting Adults by iamacat · · Score: 1

      How many people do you think REALLY want to make a living sucking your dick as opposed to those forced to by mafia collecting drug debt or some such thing? A lot of things - suicide, riding motorcycle without helmet, hot schoolteachers putting it out for students - should be theoretically legal but in practice come with issues.

    3. Re:Consenting Adults by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      so, prostitution is the series of cheat codes for sex, and some honest players get into a moralizing mode?

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    4. Re:Consenting Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who are you to decide how people want to spend their lives?

      http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3114238/Lap-dancers-not-just-pretty-faces.html

    5. Re:Consenting Adults by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      How many people do you think REALLY want to make a living sucking your dick as opposed to those forced to by mafia collecting drug debt or some such thing?

      You're not at all wrong. I'm sure the number of girls happy to be doing that job is in the double digits worldwide.

      However, if prostitution were legal, the supply would go way up and the cost would correspondingly drop. The day after it's legalized, the mafia will start forcing you to go to DeVry and become a systems administrator to pay off your drug debt.

    6. Re:Consenting Adults by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      people not getting laid getting mad at those that are?
      wonder if this factor helps fuel homophobia sometimes, as well?

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    7. Re:Consenting Adults by FuckingNickName · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The person that had to pay for drinks, a dinner, and a movie and didn't even get more than a peck on the cheak and an offer to do it again in a couple nights, in hope that you might get a proper kiss. A few weeks, a dozen hours or more, and a few hundred dollars, and they "might" get lucky...

      Oh, so the purpose of a date is to get sex, and you're a "victim" if the other person doesn't put out?

      You need to review your understanding of human relationships. (Yes, I'm sure you'll point out you're talking about "people/women like that", and not yourself. Mhm.)

    8. Re:Consenting Adults by aztracker1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the end, yes... not always that one, first date... but continuing to date someone, in the hopes of marriage and commitment, sex is a large part of that... so technically, even in the purest sense, dating is about sex...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    9. Re:Consenting Adults by LainTouko · · Score: 1

      Of course, the real issue there is the criminal world's monopoly on the supply of non-mainstream drugs.

    10. Re:Consenting Adults by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      So jealousy is a reason for hating an entire practice? because sometimes people need sex and have trouble forming stable relationships, or women just aren't willing to put out? Like seriously? Are we going to outlaw having nice things too, and having good relationships, and anything else that one can be jealous of? There is nothing wrong with prostitution except for the fact that it is illegal and unregulated. And the spread of STIs, but we should be investing a hellalot of money into curing those anyways, because they are not unique to prostitutes. And to be honest it doesn't eat away from their bottom line at all. Relationships are totally separate from prostitution, and if somebody is just looking for cheap sex they aren't exactly looking for a relationship anyways. There is a false sense of competition and an unfounded hate. What a load of total bullshit. Although I would never use a prostitute unless I was seriously desperate to get laid, my nuts turning blue.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    11. Re:Consenting Adults by RsG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, if prostitution were legal...

      Legal and regulated. The illegality of prostitution is only part of the problem with the current state of affairs.

      Prostitution carries with it some serious societal issues. Coercion from pimps, poverty, VD, and back-alley abortions have been associated with prostitution for thousands of years. None of these will go away if the laws against soliciting are lifted.

      Illegality adds another problem; it forces the business under the rug, leaving hookers essentially without legal recourse - they can be robbed, raped, killed, or otherwise harmed because the perp knows the victim won't go to the cops, or won't be missed.

      Legalizing prostitution without regulating it will solve the last problem, but not the rest. Keeping it illegal only removes the problems from public view, and makes the situation worse for those involved. You need to legalize it, while imposing health and safety regulations.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    12. Re:Consenting Adults by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      Come with issues when illegal. If prostitution was legalized and regulated, eliminating pimps abusive practices, then women could get the full profit from their work. And to be honest, sucking a dick for 20 minutes to get a few hundred bucks would sure as hell beat working at an office for 8 hours a day an making half the money. hell, I would do that to get by if it meant not having to work, and I am repulsed by the testicals of others, and incredibly strait. But money man, it rocks.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    13. Re:Consenting Adults by cappp · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm not sure you're right there, at least in part. Prostitution is legal and regulated in a fair number of countries - Australia, New Zealand, Austria, Germany, The Netherlands, Canada for instance - and treated in a somewhat more complicated manner in many more - most of the rest of Europe, India, a smattering of Central American states, and so on. The sheer scale of the sexual industry in countries that have legal protections in place - which have reduced financial incentives for what would otherwise be illicit trades - suggests that a decent number of men and woman deliberately choose prostitution as a rational employment route. Superfreakenomics has an interesting chapter online which covers the basic topic.

      That of course leaves the question of trafficking which is the usual problem raised i.e. does the prostitution industry provide a prime motivation for human trafficing. However there seems to be a significant lack of data supporting this. The Guardian ran an interesting piece covering this topic. I'm going to quote just the opening paragraph but its well worth a read if you find yourself with a free 10 minutes.

      There is something familiar about the tide of misinformation which has swept through the subject of sex trafficking in the UK: it flows through exactly the same channels as the now notorious torrent about Saddam Hussein's weapons. In the story of UK sex trafficking, the conclusions of academics who study the sex trade have been subjected to the same treatment as the restrained reports of intelligence analysts who studied Iraqi weapons – stripped of caution, stretched to their most alarming possible meaning and tossed into the public domain. There, they have been picked up by the media who have stretched them even further in stories which have then been treated as reliable sources by politicians, who in turn provided quotes for more misleading stories.

      Yes, that doesn't prove that sex workers necessarily enjoy their work. It doesn't prove that other forms of coercion don't exist.But it does frame the issue somewhat differently.

    14. Re:Consenting Adults by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      It's common sense when you think about it. No legitimate brothel is going to want to risk its license to operate by hiring a bunch of trafficked sex slaves. Meanwhile illegal brothels have huge incentives to ONLY use trafficked prostitutes because they are much less likely to rat out the pimps to the cops.

    15. Re:Consenting Adults by cappp · · Score: 2, Informative
      Uh buddy....if you're paying a couple hundred you're the one getting fucked

      It turns out that the typical street prostitute in Chicago works 13 hours a week, performing 10 sex acts during that period, and earns an hourly wage of approximately $27. So her weekly take-home pay is roughly $350. This includes an average of $20 that a prostitute steals from her customers and drugs accepted in lieu of cash.

      Thats from the Superfreakenomics article exerpt I cited before.

    16. Re:Consenting Adults by cappp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup, and frankly I imagine using sex slaves is far more work than it's worth when you're in a country where it's fine to just slap a job ad in the local paper.

    17. Re:Consenting Adults by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Illegality adds another problem; it forces the business under the rug, leaving hookers essentially without legal recourse - they can be robbed, raped, killed, or otherwise harmed because the perp knows the victim won't go to the cops, or won't be missed.

      Where exactly do you think the coercion from pimps, poverty, VD, and back-alley abortions come from?

    18. Re:Consenting Adults by mr_mischief · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, the victim is the 12-year-old runaway who has sex with countless strangers because her pimp is the only one who keeps her fed, or the 11-year-old girl kidnapped and shipped overseas to be sold into sexual slavery.

      The problem is, that's not the only type of prostitution that's illegal. Stop the kidnappers when you can, and get the runaway back to her parents or into foster care.

      Leave the adults to do what they want, and tax it and regulate it for safety. If there's a legal market for prostitution that doesn't include some of the worst abuses in the illegal market, the worst abuses will be less tolerated by those doing it legally. They'll report violent pimps, underage girls, kidnapped girls, and johns who hit or rob them much more often if they're not in fear of getting busted themselves.

      And no, I am not in favor of prostitution. I've always had enough sex without paying for it, and I don't have a desire to start. I don't think it's the healthiest of activities for the whores or their clients. I'm not one to pry into the sex lives of others on a regular basis, though, and I think it's clear that banning and prosecuting prostitution makes things worse.

      If they're going to do it and you can't stop them, make it safer for them to do it. Even people opposed to the practice need to be smart enough to see that banning it does no good.

      Legality is not an endorsement by the state or by a town's population. We have legal tobacco products with heavy taxes that pay for press to keep people from smoking and chewing. We teach kids it is dangerous and irresponsible to smoke. Yet it's legal. Legality just means there's no reason for something to be illegal or that the benefits to legality outweigh the benefits to a ban and failed enforcement.

    19. Re:Consenting Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legalizing and regulating prostitution would be great, but regulation itself would bring a whole load of problems too. How many people would risk bringing home the receipt of a hooker or even giving their name, address and VAT details to one?
      I'm not against regulation, it's just that we can't expect to make it work like other activities.

    20. Re:Consenting Adults by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, so the purpose of a date is to get sex, and you're a "victim" if the other person doesn't put out?

      In a society where sex is regarded as a normal and important part of life, no.

      In a puritanical religious society where sex is regarded as sinful, yes.

      If sex were like, for instance, playing cards -- you're willing, I'm willing, let's do it -- then there would be no need for subterfuges. However, since sex demands such expensive efforts, accepting those efforts and not providing sex is fraud.

    21. Re:Consenting Adults by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      How much additional regulation would even be needed? Women in the porn industry don't always have it easy, but don't seem to be a societal problem, though of course the government is pushing for more regulation.

    22. Re:Consenting Adults by NEW22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People of both genders go on dates for a variety of reasons. You are defining one of those reasons as being bad/not the proper purpose. Eh... guess I don't see it.

    23. Re:Consenting Adults by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      You left out the worst part: they have sex with Chicagoans.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    24. Re:Consenting Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind the fact that sexual desire is the manifestation of the reproductive instinct, and all the love and affection one feels for ones significant other is just an extension of this; close relationships among people are selected for genetically, as it makes it easier for the group to survive and reproduce.
       
      It really is all about sex, no matter how you dress it up.

    25. Re:Consenting Adults by houghi · · Score: 1

      Oh, so the purpose of a date is to get sex

      In the long run, yes.
      From Wikipedia: Dating is a form of courtship, and may include any social activity undertaken by, typically, two persons with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a partner in an intimate relationship or as a spouse.

      Obviously there will be exceptions. Like women who only do it to hook a rich men and get his money and not so much for the sex.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    26. Re:Consenting Adults by houghi · · Score: 1

      First I must point out that I am against pimping, but for legal prostitution. And not out of need, but out of principle.

      In Belgium there was a documentary about the prostitution networks. In the past girls where taken under false pretenses and forced to be in prostitution to 'pay back' the people who have abducted them
      Currently what you see much more is girl who are aware of what they are going to do.

      In short the reason for this is pure economics. It is much cheaper to keep a willing then an unwilling subject.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    27. Re:Consenting Adults by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      If dating is mostly about sex, then no sane person would ever enter a committed relationship.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    28. Re:Consenting Adults by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Based on anecdotal evidence, your statement holds true. Have you ever seen the haggard way married men look at the grocery store? That look on his face is not 'after-sex-glow'.

      Incidentally, I think I just invented a new body spray. I'm gonna call ax.

    29. Re:Consenting Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prostitution is legal and regulated in Canada? I guess if your definition includes "actually doing it isn't illegal, but you're not allowed to ask someone to do it". And no, it's not regulated.

    30. Re:Consenting Adults by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      As long as there is a demand for underage girls, there will be an unregulatable, structural amount of non-consenting participants in the prostitution labor market.

      Empirically, in places where prostitution is legal and regulated, the fraction of prostitutes who are children (obviously non-consenting) is 'too' high. In my opinion, too high is greater than zero. In yours, it may be something more.

      But it doesn't matter. Show me a good way to regulate down demand for underage girls, and I'll give you a Nobel Prize for reverse-engineering the male psyche.

    31. Re:Consenting Adults by doctorpangloss · · Score: 0

      If they're going to do it and you can't stop them, make it safer for them to do it.

      This is a common refrain that seems highly intuitive and actually applies in many situations. For particularly easy instances, we have legalizing the consumption of alcohol and some kinds of recreational drugs.

      We have hard cases too, where we can say this. Governments torture people, even the United States government, even though it's illegal, and some very smart people say, "Make it legal because they're going to do it anyway, that way we can regulate it."

      In that argument, even smarter people point out that the existence of the institution of torture will increase its practice in such a way that the benefits of regulation are outweighed by the costs of having a greater amount of torture.

      Consider the effects of legalizing prostitution. Certainly there won't be *less* prostitution by making it legal, right? And, due to a demand for underage girls, there will always be a structural amount of criminality in prostitution (minors can't consent), no matter how much you regulate prostitution.

      So what if legalizing prostitution increases the quantity of unwilling underage prostitutes such that the benefits of regulation ('making it safer') are outweighed by the costs of having slaves?

      In my opinion, the penalty for slavery is unlimited, so we must never take an action that increases the number of underage prostitutes. You may disagree, and consider it an empirical question.

      Even in the garrison state of the United States, there are underage prostitutes. Some 10%, according to some figures on this forum, of UK prostitutes are obvious slaves, excluding a significant number whose "slavery" is ill-defined. There are lots of child prostitutes in New Zealand and the Netherlands, where prostitution is legal. No amount of regulation can eliminate underage prostitution (remember, demand for underage girls = structural criminality in prostitution). Emprically speaking, I suspect the number of underage prostitutes already exceeds the number you'd tolerate; if you increased the number of underage prostitutes, you wouldn't change your mind.

      This is why polygamy is illegal. Polygamy almost always involves the marriage of adult men to underage, non-consenting girls. The empirics of recreational drugs and alcohol may favor legalization of those issues, but probably not of prostitution. At least that's why I think in most progressive liberal democracies, prostitution is and always will be illegal.

    32. Re:Consenting Adults by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      I don't buy prostitutes. But I most certainly wouldn't buy a cheap one. Cause then you are the one getting fucked, as the doctor visit to fix that burning sensation will cost you, and the STI test they do is extremely painful, even if you are clean. Any decent prostitute makes a lot mroe than that. Although that is still a pretty nice salary. at 350 bucks a week I could still pay all of my bills and make a spare 150 bucks a week in spending money. That is pretty comfortable if you ask me, for not having to work at all.

      Also you forget, street prostitutes are the lowest grade of prostitute. A high quality call girl might make 500 bucks for one hour of sex and personal encounter. If she worked 10 hours a week, well, she is certainly making a nice living without doing a whole lot of work for it. And with that much spending money she could retire at 30 if she saved up right, or worked an extra few hours a week.

      Now step it up to the highest quality prostitutes, those senators buy, who might make 5000 dollars a visit. They aren't exactly poor and being taken advantage of, they are living a life most people would kill for, and could retire just about whenever they want and live off savings, go to college, get a real job, raise a family. Anything.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    33. Re:Consenting Adults by cappp · · Score: 1
      Sorry, that was a bad joke and I feel as guilty about it as I should. That article I linked to has a section where they interview an escort who was on $500 an hour and they note that when she was considering raising her prices from $300

      she began to wonder if one hour of her time was more valuable to her than another $300. As it was, a 15-hour workload generated more than $200,000 a year in cash.

      So yeah, there is a lot of money to be made if you're up for it.

    34. Re:Consenting Adults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if prostitution were legal...

      Legal and regulated. The illegality of prostitution is only part of the problem with the current state of affairs.

      Scary to imagine what you'd get with the same folks who "regulated" California's electricity and the banking system...

    35. Re:Consenting Adults by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've got the body to be honest. But for those who do, more power to them.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    36. Re:Consenting Adults by cappp · · Score: 1
      Buddy I'm with you there but I have to point out...this article. The best quote from the thing

      That's right: I'm 47 years old, I'm a good 30 pounds overweight, and I make my living by taking care of men who come to Las Vegas hoping for some skin time with other men -- for a fee. And in case you're ready to dismiss me as someone clinging onto the last shreds of his faded beauty, you should know that I was well into my 40s before I started hooking.

      Takes all sorts apparently.

  8. So let the slashdot be the first place... by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Where attorney generals can curse at links to all the unregulated adult services websites outside US jurisdiction.

    1. Re:So let the slashdot be the first place... by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      Seriously. At least go with the devil you know.

      If there was a serious situation with a posting in adult services, presumably law enforcement could compel craigslist to turn over the IP address of the person that posted the ad, which could lead to their location.

      They will get no such help at all with whatever foreign websites come into existence to fill the void here.

  9. Only seems to effect the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It works fine for me on the Toronto, Canada Craigslist. Out-call prostitution is legal in Ontario though.

    1. Re:Only seems to effect the USA by Psychotria · · Score: 2, Informative

      It works fine for me on the Toronto, Canada Craigslist. Out-call prostitution is legal in Ontario though.

      Yes. If you'd bothered to read the article you'd have noticed "The section was shut down on Friday night to all users in the United States, but is still viewable by international users."

    2. Re:Only seems to effect the USA by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So all U.S. users need is a proxy outside the U.S.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Only seems to effect the USA by Phurge · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you'd bothered to read the article

      You must be new here...

      --
      I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
    4. Re:Only seems to effect the USA by Psychotria · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you'd bothered to read the article

      You must be new here...

      No, not new. Just forever optimistic :)

    5. Re:Only seems to effect the USA by xtracto · · Score: 1

      No... I am in Germany and specifically looked at the Craiglist New York section and it is CENSORED.

      What is not censored are the adult sections for countries outside the USA. So, all Americans will have to do is get their prostitutes from Canada (or Mexico... if they are brave enough haha).

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  10. :rolleyes: by KingAlanI · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Prostitution control is about as effective as drug control and gun control.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re::rolleyes: by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      US Attorneys General declare "War on Nookie."

    2. Re::rolleyes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      New bumper sticker to mark the occasion: "Prostitution Control means using both hands!"

    3. Re::rolleyes: by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Shhh...you'll dispel the law and order orgasmic fantasy that the republicans have! It's just like with abortion, they think if its outlawed it will magically go away. But it won't and neither will a lot of the other shit that is outlawed in the US. All that happens is that you have record large #s of people in prison costing taxpayers out the ass, spreading lovely things like HIV to people who don't deserve it and generally just fucking up people's lives. Someone arrested for smoking some marijuana is actually probably more likely to go on to commit bigger crimes in their future than a marijuana user who wasn't arrested, not due to drugs but due to the fact that the person arrested now has a criminal record and is less able to get a good job which in turn makes them more likely to commit crimes.

      Meanwhile some ass-clown(ahem Bush) goes fucking joy riding while drunk off his ass and all he gets is a little slap on the wrist, at most. Who actually endangered a life? Certainly not the pot smoker who sat on their own property and didn't drive out anywhere...... Republicans(and to a lesser extent Democrats) have fucked up the USA so insanely bad and yet the ignorant sheep continue to vote for them. I fail to see why.

    4. Re::rolleyes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my rifle , this is my gun, this ones for shootin' , this ones for fun !

    5. Re::rolleyes: by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Whats funny is that the people against prostitution is for guns. Its the ultimate example of "you can't please everyone".

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    6. Re::rolleyes: by jcr · · Score: 1

      Prostitution control is about as effective as drug control and gun control.

      That depends on your definition of "effect". Like the War on Drugs, the prohibition of prostitution is beneficial to politicians and bureaucrats.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re::rolleyes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In The Netherlands prostitution control and drug control work quite well. As for guns, they are simply forbidden. Guns are made to kill people, as opposed to prostitutes and drugs that are there to have fun. Unless you think killing people is fun this approach seems sensible to me.

    8. Re::rolleyes: by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Unregulated marijuana on the black market is much more likely to be cut with meth or some other non-marijuana drug. It's also much more likely to be sold by someone selling meth, heroin, crack, or oxycontin than a pack of marijuana at a convenience store next to the Marlboros would be.

      Gateway drug? Well, maybe, but I've never seen a definitive study. Gateway drug dealers? Yes, definitely. I've seen this happen.

      It seems very few medical marijuana patients in California go on to harder drugs by proportion. a study done through the University of New Hampshire says that the so-called "gateway effect" is probably less harmful to teens than getting stigmatized by a pot arrest, since unemployment in a person's twenties is a bigger factor in the use of other drugs. (Yes, that's a link to a pro-pot site, but they cite the sources.) There is other evidence that any gateway between marijuana and harder drugs is small, possibly smaller than that of underage drinking and cigarette use, and that it may have more to do with marijuana sharing its illegal status with other drugs than anything else.

      Likewise, illegal prostitution is much more likely to involve violence, disease, robbery, theft, kidnapped or runaway workers, underreported income or tax evasion, and other problems than legal and regulated prostitution. Leaving it illegal is like inviting these problems upon the whores and their clients.

      Both issues also use more law enforcement time and budget that could be going to either helping with real crime and combating drugs that are actually really harmful like crystal meth. Maybe even some of that budget could be saved. They also lead to other problems for the government like more undocumented workers, more problems collecting taxes, more incarceration costs, more court costs, more public health problems, more money laundering, etc.

      In fact, if the government is actually concerned about terrorists using drugs and hookers to get money, they should make all that business show up on audited books. It's just the right thing to do for the safety and security of the American people.

      Also, get it off the street corners and into registered brothels or call-out services. Kids see those street hookers, and ask Mommy what they're doing. Think of the children!

    9. Re::rolleyes: by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Many people find target shooting "fun" and a legitimate sport. Which doesn't involve killing anyone.

      I think you'll find drugs and prostitutes can kill also (ODing and STDs). As can most objects and human activities.

      One day many people will abandon the asinine left-right dichotomy over such things and embrace genuine libertarianism.

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    10. Re::rolleyes: by warGod3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those three depend upon each other! Control the prostitutes with drugs and guns. Ship drugs via prostitutes with guns. Ship guns with prostitutes on drugs... Wow... that's vicious! Even the legalization of drugs and prostitution would require a lot of regulation. Wait, are guns legal or illegal now, I can't remember..

      --
      "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
    11. Re::rolleyes: by LihTox · · Score: 1

      I'd be quite happy to have "gun control" standards applied to prostitution and drugs: make them legal, and regulate them to curb the worst excesses. Mind you, I have no personal experience of any of the three (well OK, I've shot a BB gun at Scout camp), but it seems to me that prostitution would be a lot safer if prostitutes could unionize, file grievances against their employers, etc; and safer for johns too, if prostitutes were "licensed" with regular checkups and a public identity to sue in cases of fraud.

    12. Re::rolleyes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it's less effective than that, given that all you need are money and two willing bodies, whereas guns and drugs have at least some limitations on their availability.

      You may as well be trying to stop people drinking water.

    13. Re::rolleyes: by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      "I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it."
      - Clint Eastwood

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    14. Re::rolleyes: by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Big legal businesses are most certainly no saints, but they seem a much better idea than terrorists, the mafia, or your common street thug.

      I notice a strikingly similar series of issues with gun control; ironic since one is a far-left idea, one a far-right idea; the libertarians at least seem right in this regard.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    15. Re::rolleyes: by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      yes, the left/right irony is one thing I was getting at here. at leas the libertarians are consistent on stuff like this.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    16. Re::rolleyes: by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      good point.
      so, the continuation of such programs is not stupidity per se, but rather naked self-interest?

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    17. Re::rolleyes: by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Right and left in the US is a false dichotomy promoted by the two major parties. They both want to control what you do and to grow the government. It's just that one wants to grow it a little slower than the other, and has different priorities for which actions of yours to control.

      The real differences in parties are among the smaller parties, but the Demolicans and the Republocrats keep reinforcing themselves and each other.

  11. There, I fixed it! by Auckerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the future of the Internet. Corporate censorship at the demand of the loudest group. One by one, sites are going to filter user areas. Then content. Starting with obvious things that few will care about, like prostitution. Slowly, everything is going to be so pasteurized that sites with no filters will be considered criminal organizations.

    Look, whatever you think of it is irrelevant, abused or not, the racier parts of the internet are a necessary part of freedom. Draw the line of allowed hosted content straight through what most people find offensive and leave it there.

    It may not happen in our lifetime, but if we don't demand full neutrality (for host and carriers), it's going to happen.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:There, I fixed it! by Spiked_Three · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well crap, I typed a big long reply, and as I spent time polishing my thoughts, I realized you pretty well had it covered.

      Mod parent up.

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  12. So? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Rent a server in a country where prostitution is legal. Don't specifically target the US. /end

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  13. Well Shit, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now where am I going to hire the local high quality hookers? Looks like I am shit out of luck here.

    1. Re:Well Shit, by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      Well, [stereotype mode]you could call your local Republican or Democratic party organizers, or ask the secretaries of famous TV evangelists[/stereotype mode].
      Just don't mention anything about "do as I say, not do as I do.".

      --
      home
  14. Prostitution: a moral dilemma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All right. You want an analysis. Here you go.

    First off, morality:

    The morality of any point whatsoever depends on the moral code you choose to follow, whether it is founded in some religion, a personal point of view, or merely what your upbringing has led you to find disgusting or praiseworthy. There you are, now you can answer the question for yourself, but don't expect other people to agree regardless of how fervently you happen to believe the validity of your position. Morality is a matter of opinion.

    Second, `without foundation':

    It is not without foundation to discuss the desire of women to choose prostitution. In areas where prostitution is legal, and well regulated, many women do choose that career path, even women with substantial other prospects. Even when illegal, there are those who find the career path viable. Read the memoirs of real life prostitutes for examples - there are several published. Would the average geek want to be running the servers of some nameless corporation which abuses his time and energy for less money than the prostitute makes and less working flexibility, or rather run the servers of something he finds enjoyable and valuable? And yet you find us slaving away in service of the almighty dollar. The fact is that people make choices. Some good, some less so. Just because you happen to find those choices repugnant largely suggests that you shouldn't make those choices, and is not a useful comment on the choices of others.

    Third, the `libertard' thing:

    Congratulations on your creative portmanteau word. Very clever. Since you chose to invoke morality, perhaps you will show some understanding for those who think that the libertarian view is the moral one. The same libertarian view as often championed by the libertarian party, which keeps jabbering about morality in its party platform. (Disclaimer: I think they're silly for doing so precisely because morality is a matter of opinion, but it certainly suggests that someone holds such a moral code dear.)

    Fourth, false generalisation:

    Pretending that just because some cases of prostitution are by some standards less pleasant than others does not condemn the whole idea. Perhaps different regulations are needed. Perhaps certain kinds should be banned. Perhaps there should be more social workers. Perhaps they all need to find Jesus in their hearts.

    I could go on, but really, your thesis needs a lot of work, and the defence more yet. Please have a 5,000 word essay on the false appeal to authority on my desk in the morning.

  15. This is a tragic day by plague911 · · Score: 1

    Literally hours of internet comic gold will be lost. Please think of our children. Where will they go to laugh about crazy tyranny hookers?

    1. Re:This is a tragic day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      crazy tyranny hookers

      There are hookers in North Korea?

  16. Clearly, the time has come.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for /. to take advantage of this huge opportunity.....

    Posting categories at adult.slashdot.org

    1. Geeks seeking Nerds, post count: 4
    2. Nerds seeking Geeks, post count: 12
    3. Geeks seeking Geeks, post count: 8
    4. Nerds seeking Nerds, post count: 11
    5. Geeks and Nerds seeking ANYONE, post count: 267914296

  17. Stupid by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone's not thinking outside the box. They should have just spun off that part of the company and run it from another country with sensible attitudes towards sex (eg, The Netherlands or Belgium), where the US can't touch them.

    --
    -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
  18. Reason prostitution is illegal is State dowry-tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The State wants to collect a tax on a dowry, meaning the dowry is the reserve capital a husband pays to the woman's pimp to "draw" the equivalent value in potential children to inherit and progress the family heritage; the motivation of the State (feudal lords in America have confederated into a title of nobility known as The State since 1776) is to inject currency into the economy to stimulate the region of its invasive migrant as an invested natural body-politic as well as transfer the privilege of drafting such currencies to an ecclesiastical agency to tamper the event as an elymysonary trust-indenture (U.S. Treasury to the Federal Reserve System as estoppel to the U.S. Mint). A prostitute in-effect abates the re-productive nature of the task to a mere pleasure principle, depriving the State of alleged "necessary" revenue in the still-born birth of the foreign corporate sole/soul body-politic, and then commences a transaction on mere "private" entertainment alone without notice to the public domain. In this modern day, the States give bonus to all administrators if their Hospital-births are registered a Department of the Treasury-Social Security form 5 (if I remember correctly) as well as another bonus for the Registered birth certificate on Security Paper presented to the Depository And Trust Company which is the fractionalized from a Direct Treasury Account into the private markets through Federal Reserve System and publicy through the International Monetary Fund.

    Truly, prostitution touches so-many aspects of society in religious and governmental provocitation that it is the only anchor to establish priory in averting from the Home-Rule bastards that reduce entire countries through despotism. The greatest rulers on the planet that conquered oppressive governments all were born of Prostitutes. :-)

  19. shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There goes my weekend!

  20. Out of sight, out of mind by Pilum99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since those ads are no longer easily viewed by the general public, some politicians will now consider it a victory against the evil sex trade. So now, instead of the sex trade of teenagers easily tracked by authorities and gov't officials, it has now gone back underground where it is harder to track and deal with those issues. Prohibition was supposed to improve society, but instead the booze went underground, organized crime developed, and more social problems arose as a result. Just as people like to imbibe, people also like to have sex (gasp! shock!). The allegory continues, just substitute "booze" for "sex trade".

    1. Re:Out of sight, out of mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying the "sex trade of teenagers" should be legalized?

    2. Re:Out of sight, out of mind by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      "Since those ads are no longer easily viewed by the general public, some politicians will now consider it a victory against the evil sex trade."

      No they will not. They know perfectly well that this doesn't change anything. They're doing this because the public is pushing them to "Do something".

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  21. Re:What a stupid argument by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many fast-food workers get aids? How many people wanting to run for office have to hide their past flipping burgers? How many fast-food workers are killed by customers? How many fast-food workers are dependent on the turnout of the day for their salary? How many fastfood workers do not get sickdays etc etc (in civilized countries).

    How many of the conditions you cite are consequences of the act's illegality, and not of the act itself?

    The kind who says it is okay his iPod was made with slave labor because else these people would have just starved.

    So who made your iPod?

  22. House cleaning section by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

    Actually if you look in the house cleaning services section, you will find college girls willing to clean house for $300-$450 an hour.

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  23. Re:What a stupid argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comparing prostitution with a normal job

    See, there's your problem. How is sex work not a "normal" job?

  24. Disappointing... by jcr · · Score: 1

    I understand of course why CL did this, it's a business after all, and they make their money from the real estate and job ads. It's not worth it to spend their shareholders' money litigating to defend themselves from a pack of rabid ambitious politicians.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  25. :rolleyes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Craig's list removes adult section.

    AGs declare victory, "war on nookie a complete success, just like the war on drugs."

  26. CL safer than other methods? by Allnighte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was under the impression Craigslist adult ads were safer than other forms of [illegal] prostitution. You could email potential clients for as long as you wanted (and as long as they'd put up with!) before meeting them. And you could even do a webcam session from the safety of your own home. Not getting a good vibe about a potential client? Don't even need to see him in person. The safe filtering possibilities were beyond anything we'd seen before.

    I know I read an article/blog by a CL prostitute who basically had a "how-to" on posting ads and meeting clients, but I can't seem to find it now. It was years ago. But basically she had a close call with an iffy client and vowed to play it safer from that point on. She made a guide that made it dead easy to spot clients who were obviously dangerous and how to find out more about them by only exchanging typed words.

    Of course there was the potential that a client would work really *really* hard acting like a good guy and then doing something truly evil, but anyone could be a victim to someone like that - whether you're posting an ad online, meeting someone in a bar, or even dating a friend of a friend.

    1. Re:CL safer than other methods? by mtxf · · Score: 1

      You might be thinking of this, http://collegecallgirl.blogspot.com/

      Regardless, it's a good read.

  27. Guess what? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When things are illegal, people are pushed in to them that don't want to be. The activity has to exist at the sidelines and those involved can't get help from the authorities if they need it. The problems, the abuses, happen because it is illegal and thus they have to turn to people like pimps for promotion and protection.

    However when it is legal? Not such a problem. Have a look in to the brothels in Nevada some time (you can look at documentaries rather than going there). You find that when it is legal, the problems go away. The girls set their own terms, nobody can force them. Rather than criminals the brothels employ private security like any company, and the police are just a phone call away if anything serious happens. If they wish to quit, like any other job they simply leave. There is no force or threat to keep them there, it is a business as any other.

    Please remember that when talking about legalized prostitution people aren't talking in hypothetical here, it is legal in many places. The really difference is known, documented.

    Really, if you want to get up on legal jobs that people get in to when they have no other choice look at things like fast food, menial construction work, that kind of thing. Those are what people end up having to do when they have no particular talents or skills that are in demand. That is also why they pay so little, literally anyone can do them.

    When a profession is legal, it can be kept safe (because the government regulates it) and it is a choice, since you are free to stop work at any time for any reason. When something is illegal, it is unsafe.

    With crime, when you've fallen in to that life, it can be hard to escape. You can, literally, risk your life getting out as people may kill you to keep you from leaving. With a regular job, you've committed to nothing. You can just not show up to work some day and the only consequence is they won't pay you anymore. You are free to leave as it suits you.

    1. Re:Guess what? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Have a look in to the brothels in Nevada some time (you can look at documentaries rather than going there). You find that when it is legal, the problems go away.

      You're omitting the most important detail. Since there are legal prostitutes in Nevada, does that mean there is NO illegal prostitution, or that it is vastly reduced compared to elsewhere? If so, please do provide some evidence to indicate that is the case. If not, then legalizing it doesn't improve matters at all, only serving to expand the industry, and perhaps moving the high-class hookers out the the shadows.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  28. Re:What a stupid argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Comparing prostitution with a normal job

    See, there's your problem. How is sex work not a "normal" job?

    Ever looked at the risk assessment on 'prostitution'? Why not produce a reasoned comparison between the risks of fast food work and various categories of prostitution? Whichever way it turns out, it'd probably be illuminating to a lot of people.

  29. Yeah, THAT will solve the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully the people who used CL for that will find another site where the operators are not so easily cowed.

    The alternative will be for them to just relocate to other categories on CL where they don't belong (the 'casual encounters' section in the personals seems a likely place), and just post in some sort of code sufficient for them to blend in with the legitimate posts but still ply their trade successfully.

  30. YOU ALL ARE WRONG. A man pays twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The function of money proves that the matter is NOT considered an equal exchange or fair trade in itself, that the money is used as offset to make it equal.

    Nobody gained or lost anything because money serves as an adjustment to make it balance-out as non-profit on the debit/credit relationship.

    However in the case of an enterprising man, he donates patented race-seed from his stock of nationality and then the suggestion of money in addition would prove that his is considered worth half as much as the woman's blood egg at most.

    You realy need to think about these things, because Internal Revenue code Section 83(a) says that the EXCESS over the GROSS is what is considered income; meaning that the unaccounted money the prostitute holds more than the equal exchange is considered the taxable money. Money + Sperm = BloodyEgg = fair non-profit non-taxable. That's why TIPS are never expected to show-up as part of the transaction because they exist outside the transaction as that actual taxable income over the EXCESS of the gross. Understand why Pro-Statution is a concept of liberty that has nothing to do with sex, because that designation of pro-statution means the jurisprudence is in Statutory Law that all are at liberty when they cite their exemption.

    1. Re:YOU ALL ARE WRONG. A man pays twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...what?

  31. Small white pussy cat for sale.Excellent condition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or how about a lovely chest of drawers?

  32. As a resident of a country by vorlich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    where prostitution is legal and regulated I have some sympathy for those of you living in less enlightened parts of the world. However do try to remember that while many architects (for example!) use the services of prostitutes, few, if any prostitutes are clients of architects.
    If your simplistic model of the sex industry is that of a cosy contract between customer and vendor you probably haven't been to edge of the world and looked over.
    Otherwise you would be perfectly happy for your sons and daughters, brothers and sisters and mothers and fathers to pursue a glittering career in the opportunity-filled world of the sex industry. Perhaps put in a few shifts yourself, to balance your budget in these straitened times.
    Or perhaps there is another reason why clients are called "tricks" or "Gingers" in the industry patois.

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
    1. Re:As a resident of a country by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "where prostitution is legal and regulated I have some sympathy for those of you living in less enlightened parts of the world."

      If someone wants to offer someone else their body for money, I see no reason not to let them. That's their choice. While I don't like such people myself, I don't want to see it banned for no reason, which it has been. You can have sex with as many people as you want for free, why not for money?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  33. Censored only in the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still uncensored in Canada

  34. Threat by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    With the implied threat of being sued into oblivion ( or worse ) the Craigslist dude did what he had to. Sad, but its reality.

    As the other areas get the influx of the 'bad/evil/immoral/etc people', they will call ( threaten ) for the removal of those sections too. Its all about the slow encroachment idea. Cant take out the enemy in one swipe so you nibble at them until they implode.

    My personal feeling is that this is not being driven by the still alive and kicking "temperance crowd", but in fact is being funded by the more traditional 'follow the money' concept ( via old fashion bribes and kickbacks ) and just being masked by the 'its for the children' sort of veil. I bet companies like eBay are really behind this.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. Still working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least according to 'sexy wild student Mandy, 22yo, blonde hair, 5'2", 34C, make you scream for $220/hr'.

  36. works here by hebertrich · · Score: 1

    Still works in Canada. http://montreal.fr.craigslist.ca/search/ers/?query=w4m
    It's well known we are way more tolerant in canada and dont mind.Oldest job in the world and there's no pretending it dont exist or that it can be eradicated,it cant.it's just human.Hiding it wont make it go away , it will simply find itself somewhere else where it will thrive just as much as it did before cause it's human .. Geeze catch up with the 21 century already will ya ? :)

  37. prostitution by ifeelswine · · Score: 0

    a lot cheaper than marriage. what's the big deal?

    1. Re:prostitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it's a lot cheaper than marriage: That IS the big deal. The men think other men don't deserve a better deal and the women don't like their monopoly undermined. Where the hell else will someone pay you tens of thousands of dollars for a blowjob and a couple of rounds in the hay a year and still put up with all your shit in the meantime?

  38. FINALLY by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sex for sale is now gone and will never come back.

  39. Out of site, out of mind by crudd · · Score: 1

    Its not completely gone. Its 'censored' from atlanta.craigslist.com but it is accessible from atlanta.craigslist.org/adg/

    --
    I only post when im drunk.
    1. Re:Out of site, out of mind by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

      Not anymore it isn't.

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  40. Re:Reason prostitution is illegal is State dowry-t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you are SO high.

  41. Belle de Jour by nbauman · · Score: 1

    If you want an intelligent assessment from someone who knows the facts, you should go to Brooke Magnanti, PhD (who is smarter than most Slashdot readers).

    One correction: The term used in the scientific literature is "commercial sex worker." If she went to work for the companies that made organophosphates, and lobbied to keep them selling dangerous products then she would be a prostitute.

    (Although you might argue that charging $31.50 to read your paper is prostitution http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.835)

    Belle de Jour: On science and prostitution
    17:50 20 November 2009
    Rowan Hooper

    Under the name Belle de Jour, Brooke Magnanti wrote about her experiences as a prostitute for a London escort agency, and her blog became a bestselling book, The Intimate Adventures of a London Call Girl, and a television series.

    She has a master's degree in genetic epidemiology and a PhD from the University of Sheffield's department of forensic pathology.

    She currently works at the Bristol Initiative for Research of Child Health and told her agent: "if New Scientist asks for an interview, I'll do it". We did ask.

    http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2009/11/belle-de-jour-on-science-and-prostitution.html

  42. If sex was easy men wouldn't bother with families by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Churches exists so the wealthy can come up with a reason for the poor to work hard for no reward (see protestant work ethic, divine right of kings, etc). The church and gov't are against prostitution because if a guy can just go out and have sex he won't work 3 job supporting a wife and kids to get it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  43. Then it's very effective by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Informative

    you're just mistaken about the purpose. One of the key benefits to drug and prostitution control is segregation. It keeps the wealthy and the poor separate, because if you're poor and you drive up to a wealthy neighborhood to use their (very nice) parks and schools chances are you or one of you're friends has drugs/is a prostitute. Our 'zero tolerance' property seizure laws make you guilty by association.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  44. Loophole in the law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start a porn business, hire hot girls to have sex with you (take a few pictures), make a calendar and offer it for sale from your porn business.

  45. Blurring the line by lullabud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What this is doing is blurring the line between casual sex and prostitution. It will make it more difficult legally and personally. Not good.

    1. Re:Blurring the line by HereIAmJH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What this is doing is blurring the line between casual sex and prostitution.

      Doesn't the social norm blur the line between casual sex and prostitution? For generations men have been expected to pay for dates. Dinner, movies, theatre, concerts, etc. Seriously, look at the wives of Donald Trump or the girlfriends of Hugh Hefner. The primary difference is that women don't necessarily have to reciprocate. Of course, then you get into things like the 'third date rule' and women asking "if he buys you dinner, do you have to sleep with him?" Social pressure tries to re-balance the equation.

      Prostitution simply gives men who aren't; wealthy (subjective), attractive, or personable, a social contract where they can stand on equal terms.

      All the rest of this about trafficking and child porn is simply misdirection to impose a sexually restrictive morality on the general population.

      I am of the opinion that the underlying factor that drives this is to keep women submissive. Despite Women's Liberation, women still earn less money in the job market. Women trying to raise families without male providers will struggle. If prostitution were legal, women would be making choices like earning $100 for a couple hours or waiting tables at $2/hr plus tips and pulling double shifts. You wouldn't have a problem getting your burger at Denny's, but there would be enough willing to work for the higher payoff that society could shift away from male dominance.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
  46. Therapeutic Services, not Casual Encounters by ffflala · · Score: 1

    The prostitution ads have already started to move to "Therapeutic Services" under the guise of massage and bodywork. Adult Services was like a CL trash folder; it kept the other sections relatively free of prostitution ads.

    CL had implemented a verification scheme and extra hoop-jumping for ads in Adult Services after the earlier lawsuits. CL has always been willing to comply with law enforcement requests supported by warrants. If the point was fighting prostitution, what the fuck more could CL have done? They gave police departments an up-to-the-minute list of suspect numbers, addresses, and business fronts to investigate. CL's verification efforts gave them even more info on the posters of such ads.

    And the uninformed & grandstanding efforts of the 17 AGs who signed onto the August letter to CL have just trashed this. Prostitution ads are *already* be back to where they were when Adult Services was named Erotic Services. What a complete waste of time and money this game of whack-a-mole has been. Regardless of what you think of prostitution, these AGs have demonstrated that they are not able or willing to bother to spend the time to understand how to achieve their purported goals. An election is coming up.

    Vote these incompetent AGs out. Their names are:

    Kansas: Steve Six
    Connecticut: Steven Blumenthal
    Massachusetts: Martha Coakley
    Arkansas: Dustin MacDaniel
    Idaho: Lawrence Wadson
    Illinois: Lisa Madigan
    Iowa: Tom Miller
    Maryland: Douglas F. Gansler
    Michigan: Mike Cox
    Missouri: Chris Koster
    Montana: Steve Bullock
    New Hampshire: Michael A. Delaney
    Ohio: Richard Cordray
    Rhode Island: Patrick C. Lynch
    South Carolina: Henry McMaster
    Tennessee: Robert E. Cooper, Jr.
    Texas: Greg Abbott
    Virginia: Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II

    1. Re:Therapeutic Services, not Casual Encounters by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Mike Cox was running for Michigan governor, and just badly lost the Republican primary (voting against him was the only reason I voted in the primary at all). I don't believe he was running for AG again at the same time.

  47. Re:What a stupid argument by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

    "How many fast-food workers are dependent on the turnout of the day for their salary?" This one was my favourite one. Hookers make tons more in a given week than burger flippers. They are only reliant on money in a given day if they spend all the money they get within hours of hooking.

  48. There were two different sections. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Up until yesterday, Craigslist had two separate sections for prostitution-related ads: "Adult Services," where advertisers paid a fee to post, CL staff monitored and approved all content, and there were no flagging options; and "Adult Gigs," which required telephone verification to post but was free and otherwise worked exactly like the rest of the site. "Adult Services" tended to be for professional, working prostitutes, while "Adult Gigs" tended to be for both girls and johns who were looking for more amateur arrangements like nude photos, panties, fetishes, and sugardaddy-type relationships.

    Incidentally, as of last night I had posted several ads (over the past two weeks) that were live on my city's "Adult Gigs" section. Logging into my account now, they appear to still be live: Each ad appears colored in green on my account page, which means it is "active," and I can still access management options for each ad ("Edit," "Delete," etc.).

  49. Re:What a stupid argument by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

    You sir are a worthless human being with no redeeming quality. Comparing prostitution with a normal job no matter how much you might look down on is the hallmark of a very narrow mind. The kind who says it is okay his iPod was made with slave labor because else these people would have just starved.

    Disgusting.

    So, the computer (or is it a smart phone?) that you posted your self-righteous message from -- please tell us, where were all of its components manufactured? Presumably in a unionized factory in Canada or western Europe, by workers earning a living wage and working reasonable hours, protected by a social safety net that won't leave them to starve in the street if they don't like their working conditions, or leave them to die in their beds if they fall ill, is that right?

    Otherwise you can shove off, you hypocritical, sanctimonious ass.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  50. What is the effect on the workers? by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems unlikely that closing off this route of advertising will do much to discourage prostitution. On the other hand, it will make it harder for women to offer sexual services as independent operators, and will tend to force more of them into exploitive arrangements in which much of their income is taken by "management." So it is a lose for the women, but a big win for the pimps.

  51. It's about WOMEN damn it by rubypossum · · Score: 1

    51% of the population is female. A good number of those women are incredibly ugly but rely on a vagina monopoly to get artificially higher benefits from their men. If guys were able to just go out and sleep with good looking women then they would reconsider marrying their ugly-domineering American women and would stop blowing so much money on them. This is why prostitution is illegal, it competes with legal prostitution, which is called marriage. It equalizes the power struggle between men and women.

    I happen to be married to an awesome woman, btw. Just because social norms are that way doesn't mean you can't be happy. I married her because I love her, but I am under no delusions that if I stopped paying for her housing, food, chocolate and occasional roses then I would masturbate a good deal more. See what I mean about equality? She's got all kinds of reasons to keep prostitution illegal. Men are willing to pay such a high price because they have nowhere else to go - monopoly. Yes, I could just remain in the dating scene but you can only do that for so long before the women find out you'll not commit to the terms and issue an embargo on vaginal access.

    There's no romanticism in this, but damn is it ever true. The really brilliant part is that women enjoy sex too.

    --
    I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. - Hunter S. Thompson
  52. Still have it in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only in the US apparently.

  53. Simpsons reference by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I know law students that work at prostitution because it's a very high-paying job and the hours are flexible.

    Dr. Hibbert paid for med school by working as a male stripper (under the stage name Malcolm Sex)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  54. As IT Worker by $0.02 · · Score: 1

    I work by lending my brain to whoever pay to overuse/abuse/misuse it. I've been in IT for 20+ years and I would stop going to work tomorrow if it was not for the paycheck. Still I do like to program but only for free. Free use of my brain is fun for both sides but I gotta make living so I let my brain. So why is my job legal and prostitution is not?

    --
    If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
  55. Genius by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    Now all the hookers will go back to cas, and they'll have to put a paywall on that, and I'll never have sex again.

  56. "Trafficked women" are always victims. by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    It's important to note that a prostitute, who is transported (for gain of course) by another to a third country, of her own choice, and is informed that she will be a prostitute there, but earning more than she is currently, if all of the promises to her are kept, is by the definitions of the above report 'A victim of human trafficking'.

  57. What happened at Craigslist? by randyleepublic · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of rhetoric here about the relationship between society and prostitution, but what about fucking Craiglist? I say "fucking" Craigslist, because I am shocked that they would fail to take a stand for what is RIGHT! When did they pimp their morals for the "bottom" line. Whoops! That one just slipped in.... Oh fuck, I mean darn it! I am trying to be serious here. Newmark, WTF???

    --
    Social Credit would solve everything...
  58. Twitter! by eBayDoug · · Score: 0

    Twitter is the new Craigslist for escorts.

    --
    Learn About Outsourcing. http://www.pioutsource.com
  59. Head, meet sand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, the usual Slashdot groupthink seems to be in full effect, with basically every user^^^^man on here saying the usual anarcho-libertarian line about "mutually consenting adults engaging in a contractual transaction".

    I'm probably going to get modded troll for going against the gropethink, but I'm going to pull your heads out of the sand. Life is not an MMORPG, kids. Trading cash for actions is not a morally value-neutral act, given what goes on. And I love how everyone here claims traditional religion is the reason why people think prostitution is bad. Have these people never heard of feminism?

    The cold, hard facts:
    Prostitution is a major reason for the modern slave trade. Wage-slavery exists in some industries, but nowhere is the actual buying and selling of people (women, and yes, girls) as open, widespread and close to classical slavery as it is in prostitution. And the welfare of the slaves is given far less care than even the slave trade of old, because the owners feel far less long-term investment in their property, who they go through in a fast pace fashion.

    Mutually consenting - Mutual consent between the molester and the seller, yes. But how much do you think a prostitute's owner cares what she thinks of the molester and how enthusiastic she is to suck his cock? And yes, I am using the real words to describe what they are because the usual language of prostitution like 'john' and 'pimp' is used to soften the impact of what is actually being done. Or do you think all prostitutes are self-employed free agents?

    Adults - don't make me laugh.

    Contractual transaction - there's a reason why they say "money up front", it's because it's nearly impossible to get payment for a sex act afterwards if the customer won't pay. You have no leverage from which to negotiate from. The law will not help you, both because it is illegal and because the customer can claim it was consentual and free. Not to mention many owners use illegally immiigrated slaves that are afraid to go to the authorities, or cannot speak the language.

    Face it, prostitution is evil not because Jesus says so, but because it is an industry that makes it very easy to(and encourages) traffic of slaves that are kept in line through fear of violence and abuse, moved across borders and kept hidden through view while the owners reap the profits. It has a bigger problem with this than other industries that abuse labor because it is far easier to use an abused, addicted, scared girl or woman who doesn't speak the language or fears talking to the authorities to make money by making them fucked by random strangers. For the owner the fucking by filthy cocks has the added benefit of making them more despairing and easier to handle, as does drug addiction.

    Stop thinking with your cock, people.

    1. Re:Head, meet sand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job backing up your tirade with verifiable facts.

  60. Are phone books being held to the same standard? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I assume that escort services, and modeling services, are no longer allowed to be advertised in phone books, or newspapers?