Slashdot Mirror


SlashTweaks Let YOU Micro-Edit Slashdot

Here at Slashdot, we watched as Twitter distilled perfected minimalized trivialized discourse to just the perfect 140 characters, while kuro5hin Digg reddit WSJ showed us that everyone's voice mattered equally when creating the noise news noose narcissistic experience. We've taken the next step with SlashTweaks. Within each Slashdot story dupe trollbait turdshine you will be presented with several opportunities to make micro-edits: ranging from factual errors or tonal shifts to simple typos. Since Tweaks are just a single word, there is very little barrier to entry... you have no excuse not to participate. Stories will incorporate the highest rated goatse SlashTweak natalieportman grits socially and mathematically guaranteeing the best story possible. Our highest rated trolling karmawhoring paying users can start new tweaks on individual words, while everyone else will be rating existing tweaks. Thanks for your participation and patience while we iterate on this, making sure that we are able to stay ahead of the bleeding moronic romantic cutting edge of webbovation!

257 comments

  1. winning by Alderweis · · Score: 1

    won

    1. Re:winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The only way to "win" today is to not use the Internet. That said, I'm off to play golf today instead.

    2. Re:winning by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Duh!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    3. Re:winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So "winning" means becoming a hyper-efficient, humorless drone who can't take a joke and despises anything that does not directly and explicitly benefit your current active task. Yeah. Gotcha Fuck off, buddy, we're busy actually being human over here.

    4. Re:winning by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      err... you're saying that your friends don't joke in real life? How about hiding the golf balls? taking a vital piece out of the golf cart? Something?

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    5. Re:winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hi CmdrTaco. It isn't that people hate April fools because they are humorless. People just like the element of surprise. We like to read a bunch of real articles with a few so weird that they might not be true, with one fake one hiding in the mix.

      When you come out wearing a funny hat and doing flips, the element of surprise is ruined.

  2. Can we have this on comments too ? by ls671 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can we have this on comments too ?

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      "karmawhoring" has fallen 5% below 85% tolerance.

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    2. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by sam1am · · Score: 5, Funny

      [Can't] we have this [in real life] too? was how I micro-edited your comment.

    3. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by evilbessie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can I get a +5 funny please.

    4. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Tinctorius · · Score: 2

      {Yes/No}.

    5. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by vmxeo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't believe this was modded [mod]. You're obviously another rabid [OS] fanboy worshiping at the feet of [Tech CEO]. The summary was horribly written, but what do you expect from [Slashdot Editor]? Why is this even filed under [Slashdot category, not 'Idle']? I should have been filed under [Slashdot category, use 'Idle']. While IANA[letter], I do know about [random subject] from reading [website] and you'll notice I have a [number from 1 to 100] Slashdot ID. What needs to be done is [personal opinion]. Of course, it'll never work because [conspiracy theory]. Finally, in [political organization] [country], [object] [verb] YOU!

      Please mod this comment [cardinal direction]

    6. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. No you cannot.

    7. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why should you get a +5 funny?

    8. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Insightful please.

    9. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I think you just won Slashdot.

      This comment should be auto-posted first in each article, and every other comment auto-modded to -1, Redundant.

    10. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod this comment [cardinal direction]

      I suggest modding this comment left.

    11. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it wrong that I read this in GladOS's voice?

    12. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Please mod this comment [cardinal direction]

      Will do, as soon as I figure out how to mod you "East".

    13. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by thomst · · Score: 1

      Can we have this on comments too ?

      Yep. Next April fools' day. I give you Cmdr Taquito's word on it.

      --
      Check out my novel.
    14. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Ooh, Slashdot madlibs!

      I can't believe this was modded [Insightful]. You're obviously another rabid [DOS] fanboy worshiping at the feet of [Steve Jobs]. The summary was horribly written, but what do you expect from [CmdrTaco]? Why is this even filed under [Your Rights Online]? I should have been filed under [Idle]. While IANA[X], I do know about [geology] from reading [XKCD.com] and you'll notice I have a [42] Slashdot ID. What needs to be done is [visit Disney World]. Of course, it'll never work because [Bigfoot is really an alien who abducted Elvis]. Finally, in [communist] [Puerto Rico], [picture frame] [distills] YOU!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    15. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you the person who wrote /.'s creepy semantically generated CAPTCHA?

    16. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Life2Death · · Score: 0

      Modify your own karma would have been a more lulzy feature, in my opinion

    17. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see Score:5, Flamebait. Probably because I've set Flamebaits to +6.

    18. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Machtyn · · Score: 2

      Sorry, whenever I select the first option in the dropdown list, it fails to set. I can only make a selection of the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th option.

    19. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mod {parent/me} {up/down}.

    20. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the [adjective, use 'best'] comments ever!

    21. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by BlackIcejane · · Score: 1

      You sir get the best comment of the day award You made me laugh so hard I spit coffee out my nose !

      --
      $DO || ! $DO ; try(); > try: command not found
    22. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by evilbessie · · Score: 2

      Today it does, thought I'd get in early.

    23. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      Somehow you forgot to blame the [RI,MP,MAFI,F,]AA.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    24. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      I was here when the microedits meme was born.

    25. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by IllusionalForce · · Score: 0

      Why bother with funny?
      It won't raise your karma, even if +5 Insightful never made anyone snort coffee out of their nose.

    26. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by sconeu · · Score: 2

      To hell with this micro-editing!!! Where is my OMG PONI3Z??????

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    27. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by pmontra · · Score: 2

      You got your +5 Funny. Can I get a +5 April Fool? Thanks!

    28. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      no.

    29. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by praxis · · Score: 1

      It's only creepy if you haven't yet welcomed our self-aware software overlords.

    30. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      yep - MadLibs, great to see slashdot joking on April 1 again.

    31. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You mean:
      [Why|When|How|Where] [should|would|could|might] [you|I|anyone|CowboyNeal] [get|deserve|imagine|give] [a +1 Funny|a -1 Troll|a Beowulf cluster|a blowjob]?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    32. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by smitty777 · · Score: 1

      This is the best slashdot post I've ever read. You, sir, are a genius.

      --
      "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
      Albert Einstein
    33. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by theqmann · · Score: 1

      The first option is the one that is highest rated. You can only vote for options not currently highest rated.

    34. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

      Translation: In a desperate bid to remain relevant, Slashdot makes it even easier for people {idiots} to annoy you. Bye-bye, Slashdot. It was a good run.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    35. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by vmxeo · · Score: 1

      It's only creepy if you haven't yet welcomed our self-aware software overlords.

      I had no idea I was self-aware.

    36. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Can we have this on comments too ?

      Now THAT would be great!

    37. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      "Can we have this on comments too ?"

      You do, it's called the comment field: An infinite drop-down for every single word! How much more power do you need?

      (I suspect that IS the AFD joke.)

    38. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      "Can we have this on comments too ?"

      You do, it's called the comment field: An infinite drop-down for every single word! How much more power do you need?

      This doesn't allow you to modify other poster comments ;-(

      (I suspect that IS the AFD joke.)

      You can't be serious. You are joking for sure and trying to play AF on me !

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    39. Re:Can we have this on comments too ? by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      "This doesn't allow you to modify other poster comments ;-("

      Sure it does - it's called paraphrasing! As for being serious ... well, where I am, it's well before midnight.;)

  3. Actually sounds useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    nuff said

    1. Re:Actually sounds useful by suso · · Score: 2

      That's often what happens with April Fools jokes. Most are silly, but some are silly enough that they actually raise a point.

      I'm just worried that the one I'll be posting in a few hours on @climagic will not end up with someone patching the source to accomplish such a thing.

    2. Re:Actually sounds useful by suso · · Score: 1

      That didn't come out right. I mean I would be worried if it did result in a patch.

    3. Re:Actually sounds useful by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2

      >but some are silly enough that they actually raise a point.

      Like OMG Ponies!

    4. Re:Actually sounds useful by Bucc5062 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In a strange, altered mindset way I miss OMG Ponies. Nothing said April First like a pink tech web site. Now it is just bland articles we have to guess as to real or fake. I guess there can be only one Pony moment.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    5. Re:Actually sounds useful by maxume · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, there is some value in actually fooling people.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Actually sounds useful by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      If we switch this from single words to whole phrases or sentences, we might save 40 "summary sux" comments at a time, so your useful comment begins just past the MicroShill guys, instead of half way down the page after word finally gets out that the inflammatory wording is totally misleading.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    7. Re:Actually sounds useful by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      they weren't Ponies, just under-privileged horses that didn't get proper nutrition while growing up in the inner-stables

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    8. Re:Actually sounds useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's often what happens with April Fools jokes. Most are silly, but some are silly enough that they actually raise a point.

      Reminds me of the Monster Raving Loony Party. They're a deliberately silly political party in the UK. But (as you'll see if you read the link), some of their deliberately silly policies have subsequently gone on to become real law.

      Despite its satirical nature, some of the things that have featured in Loony manifestos have become law, such as being able to vote at 18, "passports for pets", and all-day pub openings.

    9. Re:Actually sounds useful by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. I have come to Slashdot every April first hoping to have the return of the OMG Ponies. It was legendary.

      While I have too high a number to attempt to discuss how the level of discourse has fallen around here, the number of joke articles on April 1 has truly sucked. I'll take a couple GOOD joke articles but that's it.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    10. Re:Actually sounds useful by gregg · · Score: 1

      I guess there can be only one Pony moment.

      Does that mean that /. has jumped the shark or the pony?

    11. Re:Actually sounds useful by bigtomrodney · · Score: 2

      Did someone say ponies? OMG I love ponies!



      OMG Ponies!

      --
      I never get used to these constant resurrections
    12. Re:Actually sounds useful by Scott+Scott · · Score: 1

      It would work again, but in order to pull that off Slashdot would have to make it pink for, say, 10 percent of users.

      Re: "WOOO YEAH PONIES!"
      Re: "What the hell are you talking about? I don't see any ponies"

    13. Re:Actually sounds useful by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Oh please, that would be great. I can't wait for April 1st 2012 now. Meh to all the complainers of /. for their AF work. Joke on ./, joke on!

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    14. Re:Actually sounds useful by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      if fairness, /. isn't writing all these joke articles, just linking to them. So if nothing else, they just lack good editorial sense instead of lacking creativity.

      Or both?

  4. Er why by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Mostly I come to slashdot to read the commentary, the actual summary isn't bothering me that much. In fact this just makes it harder to read. I'd be a lot more concerned that I can't click on links in threaded posts because the site now wants to just open every post in the thread above it first - stop that please! The KISS principle applie shere.

    1. Re:Er why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Woosh!

    2. Re:Er why by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

      Successful troll is successful...

      --
      There is no -1 disagree
    3. Re:Er why by buchner.johannes · · Score: 2

      If the summaries were more accurate and fact-checked, the discussion could start on the topic. But since we often times get wrong statements, opinions are raised based on the wrong assumptions, those have to be refuted and checked etc. etc.
      I think better summaries would start better discussions.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    4. Re:Er why by Machtyn · · Score: 2

      I'd be a lot more concerned that I can't click on links in threaded posts because the site now wants to just open every post in the thread above it first

      You have that problem, too? I thought it was because I was working on a system with limited tech in it. When I moderate, I click on the dropdown, but suddenly my screen shifts above as the parent post is expanded. So I scroll down, click the dropdown again, but suddenly my screen shifts above as the GP post is expanded. So I scroll down, click the dropdown again, but suddenly... until it has expanded the entire thread and I can then finally make my choice.

    5. Re:Er why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly I come to slashdot to read the commentary

      Me too. I love Soviet Russia jokes.

    6. Re:Er why by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Mark Slashdot as untrusted in NoScript. Switch your user preferences to the Classic Discussion System. /. becomes usable again.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Er why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SlashTweaks is *not* going to make summaries more accurate. It's going to make summaries look more like the Comments section -- ideological, completely off base, and virtually useless to the human brain.

    8. Re:Er why by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Mostly I come to slashdot to read the commentary, the actual summary isn't bothering me that much. In fact this just makes it harder to read.

      Still easier to read than when it's written in bright pink and peppered with text speak.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    9. Re:Er why by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a {bug/feature}. You {get/have} to open every post above it before you can click the one you want. And clicking the score to find out how a comment was moderated also collapses the comment and hides its replies.

    10. Re:Er why by geekoid · · Score: 2

      " The KISS principle applie shere."

      rock and roll all night and party everyday? I couldn't agree more.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Er why by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      And here I thought you were just a Yakov Smirnoff fan.

    12. Re:Er why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rock and roll all night and party everyday

      I always thought it was "rock and roll all night, and part of every day". I mean, hey, even Gene Simmons has to wind down now and then.

    13. Re:Er why by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      yeah, me too - I mean, I not only ignore TFA (as is customary), but now I think I shall ignore the summary too.

      If this is successful (and frankly, I can't see why not) I think that I may start ignoring the title as well in future.

    14. Re:Er why by inpher · · Score: 1

      Do we call it a "fug" or "beature" then?

    15. Re:Er why by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Or when viewing a collapsed comment doesn't show you who wrote it
      Or when a comment is scored 2 or 3, it doesn't state how it was moderated. It just states (Score:2). Not like the comment above mine which is (Score:1, Interesting).

    16. Re:Er why by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Or when viewing a collapsed comment doesn't show you who wrote it

      I think that IS supposed to be a feature, to save space so you can see more of the one-line comment. However, it also no longer hides <quote>'d text in the one-line like it used to, which I consider a bug.

      Or when a comment is scored 2 or 3, it doesn't state how it was moderated. It just states (Score:2). Not like the comment above mine which is (Score:1, Interesting).

      I think that's supposed to be a feature too. It happened long before the redesign. Comments which only have one moderation don't have their moderation type changed from normal. Once two or more moderations have been made, the winning moderation type is displayed. The OP comment has been moderated twice (Interesting, Troll).

      However, there's a bug where the comment's score isn't displayed at all until all of its parent comments are opened. And I'd really like the comment scores to be shown for one-line comments, too.

    17. Re:Er why by adolf · · Score: 1

      Ever since I started using NoScript on /., things have been fine.

      I currently have no complaints about the new interface, because I don't ever see it.

      Whether the behavior you describe is a feature, a bug, or both, when I'm moderating (and for whatever reason, it seems I usually have mod points) I do generally read at -1, or at least make sure I've read the whole thread first. It just makes good sense to do so.

      I have no opinion on whether or not folks should be confusingly forced into doing so.

  5. Oh Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here we go ...

  6. Ah finally. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was waiting for the 1st April Slashdot article.

    1. Re:Ah finally. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      Nowhere near as funny as ChatRoulette.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:Ah finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame it's a bit broken.
      You can't select the first option in the slashtweek dropdowns, you have to select one of the other ones for it to edit the story.

    3. Re:Ah finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? This is a great webological advance. Imagine if we could do this for stories on mainstream news sites. It would be a revolution.

      The release date on April 1st is just a coincidence. Lots of new stuff gets released on April 1st. Like the Duke Nukem Forever release -- you have heard that the "delay" announcement a couple of weeks ago was just an attempt to throw off competitors, right? It's going to be out today.

    4. Re:Ah finally. by Cap'nPedro · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have ponies.

    5. Re:Ah finally. by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Nowhere near as funny as ChatRoulette.

      Now with more penises!

    6. Re:Ah finally. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2

      Absolutely, that one was the best April Fools of all times IMHO.

    7. Re:Ah finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nowhere near as funny as ChatRoulette.

      Now with more penises!

      OMG penes!

  7. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you will be presented with several opportunities to make micro-edits: ranging from factual errors or tonal shifts to simple typos.

    Surely the editors have been using this feature all along?

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can haz this for real? April fools or not this should actually be instated with the quality of slashdot articles of late.

    2. Re:Interesting by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      Like they don't just copy the first paragraph of the article in question and post that as the summary.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  8. Ahead of the bleeding edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in, the not-yet-cut edge?

    Oh wait, did yours say something different?

    1. Re:Ahead of the bleeding edge by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      And why were on the subject why is it so good to be cutting edge, a blunt edge is just as good. A sword to the head will have the same result at a bat to the head.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    2. Re:Ahead of the bleeding edge by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      And blunt weapons get %50 bonus damage to undead; all the better for the editors around here.

  9. My 2c. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check the date of the post guys.

    1. Re:My 2c. by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      Yes, 10:04 PM -- Friday April 01 2011. The fools have been filtering in all day

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
  10. Kuro5hin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blimey...I'd forgotten that existed. Now I feel old.

    1. Re:Kuro5hin? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      It's been years since I'd looked. The whole front page is nothing but crappy forum troll posts. I get a feeling this isn't just an April Fool's thing. It's like /b/ but sadder.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:Kuro5hin? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      So has everyone else. Rusty included, I think.

  11. Turdshine by jimbolauski · · Score: 0

    I learned a new word today, I can't wait to use it in an inappropriate setting. Am I using it correctly if after a co-worker asks me fix his fuck up I say all I will need is some turdshine.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    1. Re:Turdshine by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Turd polishing is a time honoured tradition in software development.

    2. Re:Turdshine by theskipper · · Score: 1

      Hey, lay off Microsoft. Those jokes aren't funny anymore.

    3. Re:Turdshine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such wit. Do you have a writer or do you come up with this crap (and I do mean crap) yourself?

  12. Good to see Kuro5hin is getting the respect by wiredog · · Score: 1

    it deserves, being equated with goatse and all.

    Rusty must be so proud.

    1. Re:Good to see Kuro5hin is getting the respect by TeknoHog · · Score: 2
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  13. Can we lose the links? by Rich0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    While we're at it, can we get an option to remove all the hyperlinks from summaries? None of us follow them anyway and they tend to distract from the flaming.

    1. Re:Can we lose the links? by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      To be honest, you may as well add removing every second and third word from the summaries too. Followed by erasing the rest of the summary to tidy the place up. Really, the title is enough to have a proper debate on here. That's all the scientists use.

    2. Re:Can we lose the links? by Lyrata · · Score: 1

      You like this. They added Facebook integration, right?

      --
      50,000 characters used to live here.
    3. Re:Can we lose the links? by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      Really, the title is enough to have a proper debate on here. That's all the scientists use.

      Or just post 'Microsoft', 'Apple' or 'Google' as the title and allow the debate to begin. Its not like you need any additional words ;)

    4. Re:Can we lose the links? by k6mfw · · Score: 1
      >option to remove all the hyperlinks from summaries?

      Probably a good option because a real /.er does not read the articles though many times I do so I guess I'm disqualified.

      fyi, what is this "ponies" other people reference?

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    5. Re:Can we lose the links? by Rydia · · Score: 1

      1 April 2006, the most magical day on the internet. Slashdot gave us this:

      http://farm1.static.flickr.com/45/121120624_5b9fb34dcb.jpg

  14. Confused... by Tigger's+Pet · · Score: 2

    April Fool - what part of the world is /. base in, where it's only just turned April 1st? Somewhere in Russia maybe? Or possibly Fiji? I've been waiting 13 hours for this to happen.

    1. Re:Confused... by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      /. is in the You Ess Ay. That and this post was probably written three days ago and has taken this long for mods/trolls to post it up to the front page. Tomorrow it'll be duped with bad coding and a few editable fox.com links.

    2. Re:Confused... by Kentari · · Score: 1

      It has been April 1st for quite a while in Russia by now. All of it is in GMT +x time zones... Fiji as well. You're looking for Alaska, Hawaii, the Aleutian Islands, Samoa or so.

    3. Re:Confused... by Tigger's+Pet · · Score: 1

      You're quite correct of course. I was looking at my world time zone chart, and failed to notice that the time-line I was looking at was actually just gone midnight on Saturday morning - so I was an entire 24 hours off. My cock-up. I meant, of course, somewhere like Honolulu.

      Oops...

    4. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Holy shit your understanding of time zones is broken.
      2. USA MOTHERFUCKER.

  15. Re:Can we have this on too ? by xMrFishx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can {we/you/me/us} have {this/that/the other} on {comments/replies/trolls/pron} too? {No/No/Certainly Not} {./!/?/oneoneone}

  16. Whoosh by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

    Wowser.

  17. world+dog getting wind of what byrds saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disarm

    take better care of each other

    tweet in person

    co-create

  18. You're slipping. by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The best April fools jokes I've seen so far today are the Canterbury Distribution and the ThinkGeek "Apple Store" Playmobil set, and the ThinkGeek "Lightsaber Popsicle"

    Just close enough to reality to catch you unawares.

    --
    BMO - OMG PONIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. Re:You're slipping. by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The best April fools jokes I've seen so far today are the Canterbury Distribution and the ThinkGeek "Apple Store" Playmobil set, and the ThinkGeek "Lightsaber Popsicle"

      Just close enough to reality to catch you unawares.

      Actually, xkcd's effort this year is (a) fun and (b) is a cool hack. Not so much a "gotcha" though since (like last year) they've actually been and gone and done it (Don't just look at the latest cartoon).

      Sorry, Slashdot pranksters, to rain on your parade, but you needed to add tweaks to every single article to compete...

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    2. Re:You're slipping. by InEnacWeTrust · · Score: 1

      The old school typewriter is also really cool...
      http://www.spinninghat.com/product/typescreen

    3. Re:You're slipping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I thought MadLibs were fun as a kid.

    4. Re:You're slipping. by II+Xion+II · · Score: 1

      I think Blizzard has it this year for WoW with their Clippy-clone Crabby. Follows you along their web page linking you to Rebecca Black and generally being a nuisance responding based on what you're doing on the site.

      Very well done by Blizzard. Seems like they actually spent some time and creative energy on this endeavor and I was chuckling the entire time.

    5. Re:You're slipping. by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I read xkcd in Google Reader and today's just showed up as a normal cartoon. Without your comment I would have missed this.

    6. Re:You're slipping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm not getting anything for xkcd.

      is that the prank? it doesn't load?

    7. Re:You're slipping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, xkcd's effort this year is (a) fun and (b) is a cool hack. Not so much a "gotcha" though since (like last year) they've actually been and gone and done it (Don't just look at the latest cartoon).

      What they've actually gone and done is slashdotted themselves...

    8. Re:You're slipping. by Khopesh · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Slashdot pranksters, to rain on your parade, but you needed to add tweaks to every single article to compete...

      Every article published after this one uses it. Close enough without getting annoying. (Though it's too bad submissions can't do it.)

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    9. Re:You're slipping. by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      There's a 3d related joke and all strips have a funny 3d effect

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  19. yay, april fool by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Informative

    I only wish the most recent redesign was the april fool joke.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:yay, april fool by maxume · · Score: 2

      If you flip on the preferences to the equivalent of "use the old stuff", the changes aren't that noticeable (but maybe you liked the middle redesign more than this one or don't like to stay logged in).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:yay, april fool by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Forget the previous version - I wanna see ponies!

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:yay, april fool by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      But, it doesn't affect a lot of the "operations" of the site still. E.g. the way jumping to comment use to work (I realize it still works, I mean how the comments around the linked comment are handled) .. or more what I liked, you could rate pts yourself for Troll, Flamebait, Interesting, etc..

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    4. Re:yay, april fool by maxume · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/my/comments has the moderation modifiers.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:yay, april fool by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't affect the scores for me anymore. I even tried crank things up to +/-6.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    6. Re:yay, april fool by maxume · · Score: 1

      I have all the new comment stuff turned off and I definitely see the effect some of the time (there do seem to be certain views or whatever that ignore it).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  20. Funniest by LordGibson · · Score: 1

    Now THAT'S funny.

  21. Nothing new here by Things_falling_apart · · Score: 1

    I am sure this is already in use in newsrooms across the country, and slashdot of course.

  22. Too late by Combatso · · Score: 1

    SIMPSONS DID IT!

  23. At least on serious article today. by world_citizen · · Score: 1
    Very good idea.

    At least an article that isn't an April fools day article.

  24. Just gotta say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as /. april fools jokes go, this is SlashWeak.

    1. Re:Just gotta say by Hammer · · Score: 1

      This does not qualify as a joke more like a pathetic feeble attempt at one

    2. Re:Just gotta say by isopropanol · · Score: 1

      Funny but too obvious.

    3. Re:Just gotta say by dintech · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, at least someone should be editing slashdot. Even if it's only pretend.

  25. madlibs live! by itwbennett · · Score: 1

    Only snarkier

  26. The purpose of this is ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

    what exactly ?

    also the "do-my-job-for-me dept." joke didnt escape me.

    1. Re:The purpose of this is ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [The purpose of this is] what exactly ?

      It's called "humor". It's one of those "being human" flaws that clearly superior emotionless drones like yourself love to point out. That is, if you had the capacity to love or appreciate anything; I suppose it's more accurate to say it's one of those flaws drones like yourself are programmed to point out before reporting in your error logs about how that section of your behavior has reduced efficiency in your daily output by 0.045%.

      Next, I fully expect a report on how this does not qualify as "humor" due to it failing to meet the appropriate tolerance by 450 milliMcPhees or some bullshit like that before returning to your soulless life of pointless menial work.

  27. In soviet Russia by polle404 · · Score: 2

    In soviet Russia, Slashdot microedits/goatse's/karmawhores/grits YOU!

    --

    ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
  28. Fuck Malda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow...you're even stealing your gimmicks on April Fools from Reddit now, nice. At least it's better than having to sit through 12 pages worth of Malda's fucking shitty jokes.

  29. Great by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Slashdot 1984, where the past is rewritten as you please. :P

    --
    I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  30. Nice! by froggymana · · Score: 1

    Slashdot just keeps getting better and better! Can't wait to use this on future articles

    --
    "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  31. Great, yet another moronic April Fools Day by Megaweapon · · Score: 2

    At least Taco remembered some of the old school Slashdot. Props to the natalieportman and grits mention.

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    1. Re:Great, yet another moronic April Fools Day by McLoud · · Score: 1

      Thats not even that old-school, just post-Phanton Menace if my memory even serves me right

      --
      sign(c14n(envelop(this)), x509)
    2. Re:Great, yet another moronic April Fools Day by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Was amused to see "goatse" as an option, default no less!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:Great, yet another moronic April Fools Day by geekoid · · Score: 1

      1999 is old school for /.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Moronic Edge... by Sabre+Runner · · Score: 1

    Yeah...

    --
    No one ever said being a Heretic was easy.
    Let us meet again in "Less Interesting Times"
  33. Lol by Klept88 · · Score: 1

    Lol goatse, that brings back memories

    --
    Bi-Winning
  34. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just about as boring as slashdot's daily microsoft bashfest and endless misguided political rants.

  35. Google's is better... by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 1

    They have a new Gmail motion link on the search page. It's a way to write your emails using body language and your webcam.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
    1. Re:Google's is better... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      If I used my webcam to write emails, I'd end up facing several sexual harassment lawsuits.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  36. Obligatory by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 2

    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

    WINNING!

  37. Huh? by Addict7 · · Score: 1

    Who is natalie portman?

    1. Re:Huh? by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1

      Who is natalie portman?

      One of the authors of this paper.

  38. Need more choices by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    All drop down boxes should have a minimum of 20 word choices pulled from an online thesaurus. For example, the word choice I would have used after Twitter is "compacted."

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  39. That's nice by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

    But can we micro-edit in UNICODE???

    â £ â Â¥

  40. OMG! by emton · · Score: 0

    Not funny. I want back the ponies!

  41. Ponies by rocket97 · · Score: 1

    I still like the Ponies April Fools better.

    --
    "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  42. lack of write-in candidates by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

    Though I applaud the collaborative edit = Fool notion.

  43. New /., much worse than the old. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Since the /. redesign, the number of comments visible at any browse level is very different from what the slider says it should be. It's very evident when you browse at +5, it says that there are five comments, and yet only one is visible.

    Same problem on various versions of firefox on WinXP, OS X, and Ubuntu.

    Any chance of this being fixed? Is there even a bug on this?

    Or have people pretty much given up hope complaining about this? It's a shame, because I always looked to the /. comments for insight into the tech community.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:New /., much worse than the old. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hate to be a party pooper, but wasting time on gimmicks like this instead of actually making slashcode work properly is pretty poorthetic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:New /., much worse than the old. by cosm · · Score: 1

      Nope, known bug. I and others have reported it. The gist is if you are browsing at a +5 threshold, you will only see +5 parents whose parents are +5. If a +5 is under a troll, well the troll wins.

      My sig says it all.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  44. Seems normal by Combatso · · Score: 1

    Slashdot summaries have always read like mad-gabs to me.

  45. WINNING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WINNING!!!

  46. Needs more Irony! by RulerOf · · Score: 2

    Can I get a +5 funny please.

    I sure hope so.

    Can I get a +2 Troll?

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  47. Blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No pony options, lame.

  48. Natalie Portman by snookiex · · Score: 1

    Stories will incorporate the highest natalieportman rated socially and mathematically guaranteeing the best story possible

    That could work out well. C'mon people, it's hard to do April fool's jokes these days, at least the tried something.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  49. "color" versus "colour" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool. Real-time, personalized language localization.

    This will probably also help a lot when slashdot China gets launched. Users can self-censor, which I imagine will save a lot of editorial work.

  50. Re:Needs more [Bacon]! by spammeister · · Score: 2

    Can I get a [ham and swiss on Rye, light on the mustard]?

    --
    I tried to think of a good sig, and this wasn't it.
  51. Ads by ItsPaPPy · · Score: 1

    Everyone that clicked on any of those drop downs just gave money via ad clicks. Congrats on finding a new ad revenue slashdot!

  52. I turned them all green by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1

    Do I get a pony?

    1. Re:I turned them all green by coolmadsi · · Score: 2

      No, you have to turn them all pink to get a pony.

  53. Sort of like earth hour, but more useful by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    Yea! Another pointless April Fools OR Turn off your internet for a day ... umm Day!

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  54. Don't like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how do you turn it off?

  55. Re:Needs more [Bacon]! by snspdaarf · · Score: 2

    Oveur: "Give me Hamm on five; hold the Mayo!"

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  56. If both survive the loof lirpa by SemperUbi · · Score: 1

    ...combat will continue with the Ahn Woon!

  57. April Fools by Jastiv · · Score: 2

    I actually like April Fools.

  58. Excellent mod but you didn't go far enough by bjs555 · · Score: 1

    Micro-editing at a word level is too crude. Try it at the letter level. You'll need to add a lot more drop-down boxes, but I find that the boxes add flair to the dull sequences of words in an article. Grammar Nazis will love it. Why stop at letters? Give us the ability to change fonts and colors too!

  59. Do not want by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Stories will incorporate the highest rated goatse guaranteeing the best story possible.

    Highest rated? What, are you going to do a hot or not with goatse?

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  60. A real question by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 1

    Why wasn't Webbovation boxed?

    --
    Sent from my CR-48
  61. Bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The perfect opportunity to craft reality in my own image.

  62. Nice. by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    Mad-libs for geeks.

  63. Mad-libs! by Linnen · · Score: 2

    Cannot believe I forgot the date.

  64. sucks by justanetgod · · Score: 1

    I don't want to explore drop down bullshit. I just want to read the fricking summary and determine yeah or neah, and then move on. Who has time for this crap? It just makes it difficult to read and impairs the communication.

    1. Re:sucks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Somebody can't read a calendar~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  65. Ahhh by mysidia · · Score: 1

    I'm uncertain whether to enter serious MicroTweaks or Jokes. Do I bore myself with minor edits to articles, or raise the ire of Slashdot editors by picking the funniest choices?

    #%&@)%*@(JFIAW

    Endless loop

    ***BOOM*****

  66. No dice on comment mad-libs by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    It [appears][looks][sounds][smells][CowboyNeal] like that [is not][is][might be][takes][eats] the case.

    (I tried the exact HTML syntax of TFA plus some variants, no dice on actual <select> and <option> tags)

    Maybe I can still get the "The April Fool" Achievement? (this is my first April 1 post in years).

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    1. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 1

      Maybe I can still get the "The April Fool" Achievement? (this is my first April 1 post in years).

      Hey, good point... don't think I have that achieve myself.

    2. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Is that a real award?

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    3. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      Is that a real award?

      Dunno ask me tomorrow.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    4. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by Saffire · · Score: 1

      [Yes][No]

    5. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by slashtivus · · Score: 1

      Hmm, yea I forgot about that award. Already have it, but might as well get a refresh on that one.

    6. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by Dunega · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible!

    7. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful.

    8. Re:No dice on comment mad-libs by rb12345 · · Score: 1

      Is that a real award?

      It was when the achievement system was added (1st April 2009).

  67. Please stop this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This change is horrible! It's incredibly distracting to the eye and makes reading hard. Please stop. Or at least let me turn it off.

  68. This is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Madlibs for slashdot! I *LOVE* it. the truth revealed. Its prophetic really, Im sure that there will be alternative translations for Broadcast news where you can substitute 'HEAD LAWMAN' for Obama, and "HEAD LAWWOMAN' for Hillary, and "COWBOY NEIL' for... Yeltsin, and "HEAD_CHEESE" for Sarkozy.

  69. editor wars by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1

    If we get microediting for the comment section, it would make those threads where people argue over the relative demerits of (vim)|(emacs) delightfully confusing. Which is well, because we wouldn't want the (vim)|(emacs) morons to know how crappy their editor is.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  70. What does the karmawhore's interface look like? by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    Our highest [rated][trolling][karmawhoring][paying] users can start new tweaks on individual words, while everyone else will be rating existing tweaks.

    What's the threshold? What does it look like to those that qualify?

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  71. Kuro5hin: like /b/ but sadder. by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Even Rusty doesn't post there anymore.

  72. most Aprils fools stories by iloveterminals · · Score: 1

    never have i seen so many April fools stories on /.

  73. did I get fooled or was it a WHOOSH? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    My first impression of this micro-edit is slashdot has really took a turn to the worst. Many other websites that used to be convenient to access and read now has all kinds of goofy javascript or other mischief i.e. gizmodo so I figured this site has bit the dust like everyone else. Then..... I realized April 1st! I all hope this is just a bad dream and when I wake up tomorrow everything will be like it was.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  74. What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the end of all the [grammer / grammar] Nazis!!

  75. please get rid of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this feature is pointless and stupid. please get rid of it

  76. april fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lulz. Nice try but nothing will ever beat OMG!!!! Ponies!!!!

  77. Assuming this is an April fool's Day joke, by rickb928 · · Score: 2

    then I can wait a day for sanity to return to my reality. If not, I'm more than disappointed.

    You know just how frakking messed up micro-editing is, right? It renders your RSS feed unreadable.

    And then there's the complete devastation of IE7 users. I'm stuck with this at work. Browser snobbery is counterproductive, even if there are security issues, which my corporate security has so far solved so well that IE7 doesn't work here any more. More pus.

    Slashdot code is not getting better. Hopefully this is part of a cycle of break/fix.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  78. What if something actually happens... for reals by ifrag · · Score: 1

    So I guess everyone just assumes that nothing actually happens today? I mean, if there was some big real story, it would take at least a couple days of follow up before anyone thinks it really happened.

    --
    Fear is the mind killer.
    1. Re:What if something actually happens... for reals by Ninth+Marion · · Score: 1

      A good April Fool's stitches itself into plausible reality, and yet when revealed is clearly foolish. It's difficult to think of a more important lesson a participant in media/news could learn, than to understand it is never a perfect reflection of reality and critical thinking is called for. It's like a worldwide Gullibility Awareness/Critical Thinking day

      Beside, there's a pretty strong implicit rule that's generally followed that the joke is never anything serious and no-one ever falsely claims it isn't an April Fool's joke when called on it.

  79. MadLibs!! by Sta7ic · · Score: 1

    Slashdot -- Mad Libs edition! BEST. APRIL FIRST. EVER. Can we keep this after today as a 'special section', to parallel Idle?

  80. Wrong Answers by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    Sometimes when I pick an option, it turns green and writes itself in, but other times it turns red and makes me pick another one.

    It makes me feel like I'm not smart enough to get a subtle joke. :(

  81. Reading the parent post by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's to force you to read posts in context before moderating them.

  82. DRONES LIKE MYSELF !! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    oh yeah !!

  83. YOU TELL HIM BOY !! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    you tell them unity100 how an emotionless drone he is. good job !!

    i always wanted someone to shove that in his face. thank you.

  84. k5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Kuro5hin even still around? If it died would any notice it was gone?

  85. argh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the fucking straw! I'm outta here! Fuck you, slashdot!

  86. What is this? by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 1

    I don't even.

    --
    sig not found
  87. uhm.... by flinkflonk · · Score: 1

    -1 troll

  88. Can [I] have [your] [girlfriend] too ? by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    TSIA

  89. Holy Shit by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    WTF is happening around here?

    Moderators are doing less, almost no story breaks 20 +5 comments.

    We can't filter as well as we used to be able to now this?

    I don't want to point out that the comments are getting worse as well, but they are, straw man arguments and people who appear to be shills for government and big business are running amok. So instead of trying to fix the place, make search better, show all of a users comments, make stories editable longer (with whatever usability tweaks are required to show what the original discussion looked like) we get new little features based on social media?

    I'm involved with a site that's trying to raise their level of discourse, I'm recommending an old version of slashcode and that's sad.

  90. ouch! Ouch! OUCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes my head hurt

    Will ThinkGEEK be selling un-microedit glasses as well?

  91. Kind of clever actually by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    I think it's pretty clever, since it's pointless and quite buggy... kind of like the rest of Slashdot's recent UI changes. So it's quite the meta-joke :)

  92. April 1st. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How incredibly freaking annoying. I hope this an April fools joke.

  93. For at least one day... by kyrio · · Score: 1

    It's a fun game.

  94. warning: NSFanything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because it's wikipedia doesn't mean it's fit for human viewing

  95. Feature suggestion by LordStormes · · Score: 1

    Can we use this to de-troll comments?

  96. There's an easy solution by default+luser · · Score: 1

    Just pick a selection that's so outlandish you know it won't take. Then when it refuses your choice, select the first entry.

    This way you have to be REALLY sure you want the first selection, so sure that you'd risk selecting something completely wrong just to have the opportunity. That's not a bug, that's a feature!

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  97. Re:Can we have this on too ? by Cylix · · Score: 1

    {You/I} {am/are} {winning/smoking} {winning/crack}.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  98. ehhhhhhhh by Essequemodeia · · Score: 1

    I don't like this.

  99. wow - this is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you guys not have anything better to do?

  100. Thank you CmdrTaco by LurkerML · · Score: 1

    you made me realise my addiction. Only posting here to get my April's Fool achievement. :(

    1. Re:Thank you CmdrTaco by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, achievements! :-D

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  101. Google pulldown incorrect by cherry-blossom · · Score: 1

    The Google pulldown needs an NSA tag.

  102. Wait a moment... by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    This is an April Fools joke, right? It's so hard to tell, it maps to neatly into the long Slashdot decline...

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Wait a moment... by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

      s/to/too/

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  103. Webbovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought "webbovation" was training cows to properly utilize the Internet!! Shows what I know!

  104. Get good old slashdot back using in D2 mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edit your comment preferences and select Slashdot Classic Discussion System (a.k.a. D1) for the original classic slashdot threaded discussion system. It's the only sensible way to read slashdot.

  105. screwing rss feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you slashdot for screwing the RSS feed.

    Here at Slashdot, we watched as Twitter distilled perfected minimalized trivialized discourse to just the perfect 140 characters, while kuro5hin Digg reddit WSJ showed us that everyone's voice mattered equally when creating the noise news noose narcissistic experience. We've taken the next step with SlashTweaks. Within each Slashdot story dupe trollbait turdshine you will be presented with several opportunities to make micro-edits: ranging from factual errors or tonal shifts to simple typos. Since Tweaks are just a single word, there is very little barrier to entry... you have no excuse not to participate. Stories will incorporate the highest rated goatse SlashTweak natalieportman grits socially and mathematically guaranteeing the best story possible. Our highest rated trolling karmawhoring paying users can start new tweaks on individual words, while everyone else will be rating existing tweaks. Thanks for your participation and patience while we iterate on this, making sure that we are able to stay ahead of the bleeding moronic romantic cutting edge of webbovation!

  106. Annoying and stupid by ErnoWindt · · Score: 0

    How do you turn them off?

  107. Distilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You people better check that 'distilled' whatever it is. It could possibly be something electrical or other source of smoke in the ventilation system, but this does seem to be playing excessivvely with our time and for what end? Is there an Opt Out function.

  108. Re:Needs more [Bacon]! by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Miss Violet Dudley, I presume!

    Why how did you know my moniker?

    By the provocative initials on you k-nickers!

    I could go on and on; but for those of you who were born after proinhibition, please check out:

    The Tale Of the Giant Rat of Sumatra.

    Hey, the next generation has to be educated SOMEhow!

  109. Netcraft confirms it, Slashdot is dying by sconeu · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  110. Humor belongs in the DISCUSSION by macraig · · Score: 1

    I visit Slashdot daily for INFORMATION. I expect to find humor, if any and however feeble, in the DISCUSSION. This childish prank doesn't even qualify to be labeled as humorous, and it doesn't belong in the submissions.

    Is Slashdot now catering exclusively to ComiCon tweenagers (twenty-something teenagers)? If so and this prank remains, I won't.

  111. RSS and Such by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 1

    I haven't been on the main /. site for ages - I tend to rely on my RSS reader instead. For once, the April Fools stories have actually brought me out of my RSS shell and in to the real web.

  112. Achievement++ by an00bis · · Score: 1

    The April Fool — posted in the April fools story

  113. twitterizing slashdot by danielpauldavis · · Score: 0

    Is that why the articles read like mad-libs?

    --
    Cranky educator.