Slashdot Mirror


PSN Outage Continues, Console Hack Claimed To Be Responsible

Over the weekend, we discussed news that the PlayStation Network had been down for days, with Sony saying little other than that it was caused by an "external intrusion" and that they were "rebuilding their network." Many of you have written to point out that the outage continues, with Sony saying they "don't have an update or timeframe to share at this point." One theory about the cause behind the network's downtime was recently espoused on Reddit by 'chesh,' a moderator at PlayStation-modding enthusiast site PSX-Scene.com. According to him, recently released custom firmware called Rebug allowed people to essentially turn their PS3s into dev consoles, though some features were missing. A different group supposedly used this firmware to get on PSN through the developer networks, and also found that fake credit card numbers were not being validated for game purchases, leading to what chesh called "extreme piracy." He acknowledges that this theory is speculation. Sony's handling of this outage is starting to draw attention from the government. Update: 04/26 20:47 GMT by S : Sony just posted more details, saying that a massive data breach occurred: An "unauthorized person" has PSN users' "name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID." Billing address, password questions, and credit card info may also have been taken.

404 comments

  1. There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got a friend who is a PS3 fanatic, and hates all things Nintendo and MS as a consequence (never understood the partisanship myself, and I've owned all three consoles at one time or another and they all have their respective merits). A couple of weeks ago when he found out I was buying Portal 2 for the Xbox (I sold my PS3 a while back), I was treated to a rant about how superior the PS3 version was because it allows cooperative play between PSN and Steam PC users (a nice feature, for sure). I thought I was going to have to give him a sedative to get him to shut up about how stupid I was to even consider the Xbox version, how great PSN is, how much Xbox Live sucks, etc., etc.

    I'm tempted to rub this in his face, but it would probably only make him worse.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you might as well. The cognitive dissonance could be hilarious to watch!

    2. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A one-week outage does not make Xbox live better.

    3. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by xMrFishx · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the other hand, PSN can't actually get worse by being down.

    4. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It makes just about anything else better, for a week.

    5. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't change the respective merits of either online service. But I bet Mikey would still have a seizure if I asked him how his Steam coop play is going.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't change the respective merits of either online service.

      In what universe does percentage uptime not one of the factors in determining which service is better? Certainly not in our universe.

    7. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A one-week outage does not make Xbox live better.

      Yeah, it's not the outage that makes Xbox live better, it's the external intrusion. Nothing quite like an external intrusion into a company that holds your credit/debit card data to make you wish you could pay for better service.

    8. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by omnichad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When one is free and one is paid? That certainly makes uptime LESS of a factor, though I suppose doesn't eliminate it.

    9. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if Sony offered a pay service, the same would have likely happened. I don't see the validity in your complaint.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    10. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Even if Sony offered a pay service, the same would have likely happened. I don't see the validity in your complaint.

      Most people assume that if they pay a company for a service, at least some of the money they pay goes to improving the service. If your assumption is that Sony's service would be identical regardless of whether you paid for it or not (and you would have to assume that for your post to be at all logical), that's awfully cynical of you. Not that you're necessarily wrong, but it should be noted that most people aren't that cynical, and thus, do see the validity of the argument you're apparently not seeing the validity of.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    11. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      It does if the fad is killed with a week of inactivity. I'm reminded of the Simpsons episode where the children go outside after the Krusty the Clown show is canceled. People will find something else fun to do. If Xbox is that other thing, then it is better by default.

    12. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The service is paid for, every time you buy a PS3 game Sony takes a cut. Just because you don't have to pay for it by shelling out directly for an account doesn't mean it's not paid for by you. Also, as the PA guys were quick to point out, you can't say "but it's free, you can't cry about it" when the network and social aspects that PSN provides is part of the core experience that prompts the purchase of a PS3 over something else (maybe not in 2005, but today it does).

    13. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by smelch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's the whole fact that it is, you know, actually better. Xbox Live is just about fucking perfect. You can bitch all you want about paying less than a WoW subscription to play all of your console games online, but that doesn't make the PSN even close to XBox Live. PSN always makes me feel like I'm playing multiplayer in 1998. I mean that literally not as a slam. I enjoy games from 1998 still. This may have more to do with the fact that Halo has amazing multiplayer if you are in to the game, and there is a lot of consistency between titles with good matchmaking. As far as I can tell each game has to roll their own for PSN.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    14. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Payment is no guarantee of service unless the contract expressly states as such. ...and...

      Anyone that writes a guarantee of service into a contract is an idiot. There's no way you can absolutely guarantee anything in this world, except the hordes of lawyers that are going to descend on your ass when you don't honor your agreement.

    15. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might've meant that because both free and paid services get hacked all the time it doesn't matter if the service is free or paid.

    16. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      and here I was still thinking this was Anon's faul

    17. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one said uptime doesn't matter. However, XBox Live has gone down before as well (once for 2 weeks if I'm not mistaken). Unless someone actually worked out each sides uptime, it's not really a relevant argument. To claim one is better simply because it's up right this second is arbitrary and ridiculous.

    18. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by harl · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need to be. Before this is was leaps and bounds above PSN. After this is will be leaps and bounds above PSN.

      The PSN is embarrassingly feature poor.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    19. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people assume that if they pay a company for a service, at least some of the money they pay goes to improving the service. If your assumption is that Sony's service would be identical regardless of whether you paid for it or not (and you would have to assume that for your post to be at all logical), that's awfully cynical of you. Not that you're necessarily wrong, but it should be noted that most people aren't that cynical, and thus, do see the validity of the argument you're apparently not seeing the validity of.

      I see the validity of your argument! I still disagree though.

      Like XBOX Live, the PlayStation Network requires hardware, software, and engineers to both build and maintain the system, and these always cost money. The fact that Sony doesn't charge most of its end users is irrelevant to security. Both are susceptible to malicious ATTEMPTS at hacking (as any computing network or system is), and I'm sure both have a similar approach when it comes down to intrusion cleanup. We see it happen all the time actually.

      Step 1: Take the system down to ensure the hack doesn't get any worse
      Step 2: Determine the extent of the intrusion (thoroughly). Identify compromised systems and what data (if any) was taken
      Step 3: Take corrective action to clean up the mess, and prevent the same action from occurring again.
      Step 4: Bring the system back online

      Bottom line: This can CERTAINLY happen to XBOX Live (or any system hosted on a public network). The fact that it's taking so long to correct is a little disconcerting, but I'd rather they fully correct it then bring a vulnerable system back online.

    20. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Spewns · · Score: 1

      A one-week outage does not make Xbox live better.

      Uh, it doesn't? What other console have you owned that locked you out of playing games for a week?

    21. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does if the fad is killed with a week of inactivity. I'm reminded of the Simpsons episode where the children go outside after the Krusty the Clown show is canceled. People will find something else fun to do. If Xbox is that other thing, then it is better by default.

      Interesting analogy because the instant the krusty show went back to the old format, kids stopped going outside.

    22. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PSN has taken down PS3 netflix too. That's pretty shitty. There's no need for PSN authentication for running the netflix software.

    23. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by starfliz · · Score: 1

      This has no logical merit. Paying for something has no inherent quality of making it more secure. If this were true then all MS products would be secure since we pay tons of money for them. If there were anything to make an issue about here it would be PSN not being forthcoming with information about what is going on and what it is doing to fix and prevent.

    24. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      You can play games against other humans. That's all I really care about. And of course, free is free.

    25. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      I can still play any of my games, and Netflix still works. I just noticed that I couldn't play multiplayer the other day. meh. I'll do something else for a few days.

      It still doesn't make up for the few hundred dollars I'd have spent on Xbox live the past couple of years.

    26. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by GNious · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even if Sony offered a pay service[...].

      They should make one ... call it Playstation Plus or something ....

    27. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Netflix worked as of last night, and every night for the previous few days even while the outage was ongoing.

      The nag box to log in comes up, but you just cancel and the app works fine.

    28. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by man_the_king · · Score: 0

      A one-week outage does not make Xbox live better.

      Uh, it doesn't? What other console have you owned that locked you out of playing games for a week?

      That would be the XBox 360 - it locked people out of playing games COMPLETELY, online or not.

    29. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by jimicus · · Score: 0

      Sounds like exactly the same sort of fanboi-ism as you see on here regarding the relative merits of Linux or OS X.

    30. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously though, why the fuck would you get the Xbox version? PC is the way to go.

    31. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Not inherently, no. But it still is better.

      XBox Live is one of the few things Microsoft actually got right with respect to the XBox.

    32. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by suutar · · Score: 1

      My netflix doesn't work. It requires a PSN login. of course, that's the installed-to-disk version. I haven't tried pulling out the netflix DVD-rom yet...

    33. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the XBox is the 'other thing' that had to be found because you no longer had access to your 'normal thing', which you chose when you had the ability to chose between both, then it's pretty obvious that the 'other thing' isn't better, it's just a sufficiently good substitute.

    34. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 2

      If your assumption is that Sony's service would be identical regardless of whether you paid for it or not, that's awfully cynical of you.

      This is Sony we're talking about. Cynicism is not really required.

      --
      +0 Meh
    35. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      I was just doing this yesterday and over the weekend. It does nag, and the login won't work, but you could still use the app as of yesterday.

      I'll try again when I get home tonight and post back, if it's still working or if the behavior has changed.

    36. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by kenshin33 · · Score: 1

      that's a more generic social/economical problem. Free/less expensive is always perceived as less quality.

    37. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by harl · · Score: 2

      But you can't. That's the point of the article.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    38. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      A one-week outage does not make Xbox live better.

      Uh, it doesn't? What other console have you owned that locked you out of playing games for a week?

      That would be the XBox 360 - it locked people out of playing games COMPLETELY, online or not.

      And when was that? No 360 game requires being connected to live to play single player, save arcade games dl'd to a different and not transferred properly. From what I hear some ps3 games are completely unplayable when not connected to the ps network.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    39. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by ashidosan · · Score: 1

      The PSN login is there, and you have to pretend to log in, and it will tell you that "PSN is currently undergoing maintenance" with the option to close the message. Then, Netflix works.

      Though, it does sometimes begin doing that inexplicable PSN-login-cycling thing it sometimes does, like when you leave Netflix idling too long.

    40. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Seumas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sony does offer a paid service. It's called PSN Plus and it's $60/yr. It's the same service with discounts on a few download titles plus automatic patch downloading.

      Having a paid service wouldn't make it any better, anyway. They're not a little startup. It's Sony. I'm pretty sure they can bootstrap a service on their own dime without a significant impact to the bottom line. Especially when it's used to bolster the userbase for their mainline product.

      Also, don't forget when XBOX Live had an outage for . . . a week? Or was it even longer?

      Of course, that was an outage. Not a complete failure of all security measures.

    41. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Seumas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sony does offer a paid service and it is identical to the free one, except it offers discounts on some downloadable games and automated patch downloads. It's called PSN Plus. PSN Plus users are also down right now and they are also part of the same data breach. So, the paid service is identical to the free service and the paid service is just as insecure as the free service.

    42. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Seumas · · Score: 2

      And XBOX Live is any better? Remember when XBOX Live was out for two weeks? You couldn't play that, either. And that isn't free.

      http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/xbox-live-outage-day-13-still-up-and-down-still-preventing-fu/

    43. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Seumas · · Score: 1, Troll

      A one-week outage does not make Xbox live better.

      Uh, it doesn't? What other console have you owned that locked you out of playing games for a week?

      What other console, besides my PS3 has locked me out of playing (online) games for a week? Hm. Only my XBOX 360, which locked me out of playing (online) games for two weeks.

      http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/xbox-live-outage-day-13-still-up-and-down-still-preventing-fu/

    44. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by eviljolly · · Score: 1

      They also charge a monthly fee, just sayin'.

    45. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by suutar · · Score: 1

      Thanks, y'all! I hadn't actually tried using it after it told me it failed; I assumed it knew what it was talking about. That'll teach me :)

    46. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bottom line: This can CERTAINLY happen to XBOX Live (or any system hosted on a public network). The fact that it's taking so long to correct is a little disconcerting, but I'd rather they fully correct it then bring a vulnerable system back online.

      I'd be surprised if (evil) Microsoft didn't have a much more elaborate and robust system for countering "external intrusions". I'd chalk up their unwillingness to tie into many outside networks (Steam for one) as proof of their caution. With as much money as Live makes for them, they'd be foolish not to protect their cash cow.
      (eviler) Sony, on the otherhand, has shown the opposite. With the rootkit on audio CDs, and now this. As well, Sony LOSES money on the playstation network. Their focus is likely on how to make it profitable, not secure.
      If you'd rather trust your personal data (including credit/debit card) to the company with a record of security failure, have at it.

    47. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      that's a more generic social/economical problem. Free/less expensive is always perceived as less quality.

      It is perceived as such in the software world, because more often then not, it's true.

    48. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a bit of a different (I suspect) between a network being down completely for a period of time due to a hack... and one being intermittently available due to a massive increase in demand.

    49. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Even if Sony offered a pay service, the same would have likely happened. I don't see the validity in your complaint.

      Yet, if the same thing happened with XBOX live, Microsoft would have communicated the outage, and an expected uptime. If the downtime was significant, Microsoft would have comped paying subscribers with a free xbox live game. The risk of alienating paying subscribers is a motivating force for communication and haste.

      Sony doesn't have this motivation, and what little they've communicated so far comes across as "It'll be done when it's done, and not before. Now leave us alone so we can get this done".

    50. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

      you might as well. The cognitive dissonance could be hilarious to watch!

      I don't know, I wouldn't do it if you value him as a friend at all. A friend of mine is a big PS3 fan and I told him, look, there's no way PS3 can be the best when they have this sort of outage. It threw him into some kind of crazy logic-loop, and he started beeping and asking for someone named "Norman" to straighten things out for him...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    51. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      They also charge a monthly fee, just sayin'.

      Their service also works, apparently.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    52. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      This isn't karma, you're being a jerk. The whole XBox/Wii/PS3 fanboi deal is stupid. I agree there's little point in bragging about which system is better, but realize the shoe could be on the other foot.

      Reality: He's a consumer who bought a product and Sony isn't living up to their end. This could happen with XBox Live or any other service like Steam.

    53. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      If the XBox is the 'other thing' that had to be found because you no longer had access to your 'normal thing', which you chose when you had the ability to chose between both, then it's pretty obvious that the 'other thing' isn't better, it's just a sufficiently good substitute.

      Either that or your initial evaluation of which was better (in which XBox was second choice) was ultimately proven the wrong one.

      (It's just a logical nitpick. Your argument is based on the assumption that the initial decision was made correctly and that the new information has no bearing on whether that decision was correct.)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    54. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by dissy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Parent never once mentioned Xbox Live (Or any service) was better, so that wasn't an argument being made to need a response about which was better.

      His entire post was a complaint about Sony fanbois who can't stop talking about how great Sony is.

      They also charge a monthly fee, just sayin'.

      Just like that :P

    55. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      PSN has taken down PS3 netflix too. That's pretty shitty. There's no need for PSN authentication for running the netflix software.

      No, Netflix still works. When you run Netflix, it'll ask you to log in to PSN. Attempt to do so, the attempt will fail with the maintenance message, but Netflix will run anyway.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    56. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by matazar · · Score: 1

      From what I've read the Xbox Live outage didn't happen for everyone.

      It doesn't matter though, this is a completely different issue because of the security concerns. There no point in comparing the 2 services...

    57. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 0

      I'm tempted to rub this in his face...

      So by this, are we supposed to understand that you are impartial and wise?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    58. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      There is a bit of a different (I suspect) between a network being down completely for a period of time due to a hack... and one being intermittently available due to a massive increase in demand.

      I don't see a difference. In either case, the network failed.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    59. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      Sony does offer a paid service. It's called PSN Plus and it's $60/yr. It's the same service with discounts on a few download titles plus automatic patch downloading.

      Having a paid service wouldn't make it any better, anyway. They're not a little startup. It's Sony. I'm pretty sure they can bootstrap a service on their own dime without a significant impact to the bottom line. Especially when it's used to bolster the userbase for their mainline product.

      Also, don't forget when XBOX Live had an outage for . . . a week? Or was it even longer?

      Of course, that was an outage. Not a complete failure of all security measures.

      If I remember correctly, it was an outage due to unexpected demand. A new game that came out over the holiday season, might've been one of the Halo titles. At least Live communicated the issues, even as they were on-going and intermittent.

    60. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by chaboud · · Score: 3

      The fact that my password and credit card number have been pwned sort of screws the PSN in my eyes.

    61. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 2

      And XBOX Live is any better? Remember when XBOX Live was out for two weeks? You couldn't play that, either. And that isn't free.

      http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/03/xbox-live-outage-day-13-still-up-and-down-still-preventing-fu/

      You could at random times during that two weeks. Microsoft communicated the issue and an expected turnaround. As well, MS comped subscribers a free live arcade game. Not to mention they didn't lose your personal data in the process. Don't forget to cancel that card!

      In short, yes, XBOX Live IS better.

    62. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by somersault · · Score: 2

      Tell that to anyone who was dumb enough to sign up for PSN Plus (which I don't see any value in myself, but I did get an Xbox Gold subscription just to get similar levels of service to a basic PSN account..)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    63. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by cinderellamanson · · Score: 0

      that's completely unverified at the moment.

      "While there is no evidence at this time that credit card data was taken, we cannot rule out the possibility. If you have provided your credit card data through PlayStation Network or Qriocity, out of an abundance of caution we are advising you that your credit card number (excluding security code) and expiration date may have been obtained."

      http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/04/26/update-on-playstation-network-and-qriocity/

      --
      Hey buddy, can i bum a karma? ~}CinderellaManson{~
    64. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Even if Sony offered a pay service, the same would have likely happened. I don't see the validity in your complaint.

      He said paying for a 'better' service, it's not that it's paid service rather that it hasn't suffered a massive data breach.
      For what it's worth im glad my PSN acct only has my old cancelled credit card details (annoyed that my other PII is on there though).

    65. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by exomondo · · Score: 1

      And XBOX Live is any better? Remember when XBOX Live was out for two weeks? You couldn't play that, either. And that isn't free.

      But it wasn't out for 2 weeks, some components of the service - administrative and billing - were unavailable for some people but you could still play games on XBL, unlike the current issue with PSN. Also unlike the current PSN situation your PII wasn't compromised.

    66. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Some games are superior on the PS3. Some are superior on the 360. Occasionally, some are even superior on the PC (though that's harder to say with each passing month as developers start to treat the PC more and more as an afterthought *sigh*). That said, I went for the PS3 version, because I liked the idea of getting the Steam version along with it (which is where I'll probably play it, anyway). Of course, I'm still waiting on being able to register my ID so I can activate the Steam copy.

      Oh, and here's what I hate about console gamers. As much as my fellow PC gamers can be pompous narrow-minded dicks, at least I've never run into one who is like this guy:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkfVEpXdP_c

      I really don't understand these mindsets. I have three PS3s and three 360s (it's a big house and I'm a big nerd) and one Wii (though I have no idea where it is -- in a box in the garage somewhere; I haven't played it since Boom Blox in May of 2008) and then my PC. I prefer the PC. I enjoy the consoles. Some stuff is better on one. Some is better on the other. Often, there is little or no difference. People online in multiplayer are pretty much cockfaces on all of them. It's really not worth those people getting so worked up over it. Especially since there isn't even the difference between the systems to create enough room for a "linux versus windows" debate or something. It's more of a Coke versus Pepsi.

    67. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by kenshin33 · · Score: 1

      "because more often then not, it's true" is a sane way to put, it implies probabilities. So Free/cheap !=> bad, and Paid !=> good. are not certain events. Be it in software or anything else.

    68. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I don't see much of a difference when you are of the size each of those companies are. Being built to quickly and painlessly scale to swift demand (rather than taking two or more weeks) and failing to maintain security of a system that you know is under recent and direct threat of attack by people that you are actively antagonizing are kind of about on-par, to me.

    69. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

      I signed up for the PSN Plus mainly because of the amount of games I get because of it. Every couple of weeks there is a new PSOne game available for free for PSN Plus members. Not saying I'm not stupid for getting it but I do get something out of it.

      As someone who has paid additional money for the service, I don't feel particularly hard done by to be honest. Granted I wouldn't be the most hardcore PS3 gamer, but I have been impacted by this by being unable to play during a 4 day weekend. But I understand shit does happen. I am disappointed by Sony's lack of communication of what exactly has happened or when we might possibly see it restored. I'm more annoyed about that than the outage itself. If they said it will be another week, fine I'll come back in a week. I like to have an evening planned and if I'm putting aside time to game online with my friends, I want to know whether or not the service is going to be there or not. This not knowing if I'll be able to game this weekend is frustrating and I expected more from a company the size of Sony

      --
      There is no -1 disagree
    70. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Seumas · · Score: 1

      That any information was compromised at all was also 'unverified' for the first nine days of this event.

    71. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of the many phrases that have become popular in today's culture, "just saying" happens to be one of my most hated because people use it as a get-out clause that they believe enables them to say anything inflamatory without reprocussion, like "that guy's a fucking dickwad, just sayin'", they're using it as a means of saying "don't shoot me I'm just the messenger".

      To those who use that phrase in everyday life: Well, fucking dickwad, you specifically CHOSE to say those words before the pathetic "just sayin'" get-out so stand by your words or shut the fuck up..

    72. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by sub67 · · Score: 1

      Looks like geohot finally logged into PSN..

    73. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by cforciea · · Score: 1

      "Unexpected demand" is marketing-speak for "some piece of our service has a bug preventing it from scaling appropriately but we'd rather talk about how awesome and cool and popular we are".

    74. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by mug+funky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      face-saving talk...

      if they say "may have been", they mean "definitely has been".

      if they say "working around the clock to fix it", they mean "shitting in our pants and yelling at our techies but not authorizing overtime for them".

      the mere mention of CC details, and the advice to avoid scammers is basically confirmation.

      they're using the same language that TEPCO has been using the last month (not just Japanese).

    75. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      What's better is the old PC games type system with no centralized server. Get your buddy to host a server on their own machine, and you connect with all your friends. Or find other public servers on the internet. This PSN outage just goes to show that a single network for all games on the system is just waiting for something bad to happen. Things don't need to be this centralized.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    76. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      The fact that my password and credit card number have been pwned sort of screws the PSN in my eyes.

      Well... hopefully this means that maybe they've learned from their mistake and it won't happen again? Maybe? I mean, it's been tested so we know where the problem was! XBox Live hasn't so there could be a vulnerability in it still that's way worse.

      See? When you think about it a little too hard and it starts to hurt, it's a feature.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    77. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      stand by your words or shut the fuck up..

      oh, sorry, i'll do that immediately, AC.

      (btw, i lean toward the "just putting it out there..." prefix, rather than the "just sayin" suffix)

    78. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Netflix is working right now.

      Start the app. You get the prompt to log in. Hit the "Sign In" button. It says "playstation network is undergoing maintenance" so you hit circle. Then it goes forward into the app. It says sign-in is required, but it isn't.

      You may get it once again, just hit Sign In and then circle out. then you're looking at your queue and can start movies.

    79. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I have not sense Xbox Live so I cannot make a comparison, but I agree that PSN matching does blow. It does seem like every company has to come up with their own hooks into whatever APIs Sony has. There is no way to simply find a friend on the friend's list and join up with them in whatever game they happen to be playing.

    80. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most companies and even developers are seeing security as an annoyance that is costly and annoying. As long as there is no breach that's fine, and most of the breaches are minimal.

      We need more high profile clustrerfucks like these so that the politics wake up and make it a criminal act for corporate management to allow this behavior.

    81. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The fact that my password and credit card number have been pwned sort of screws the PSN in my eyes.

      And of course you feel completely safe in Microsoft's hands, the company with a long and glorious history of high profile fiascos like the all-day trading outage on the London Stock Exchange or turning a modern Navy frigate into a floating barge

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    82. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Vastad · · Score: 1

      Your generalisation is without merit. Here is an excellent example:

      Switch Sound Converter by NCH Software out of Australia: US$34.99. All this software does is convert between audio files. That's it. There is a free version that is crippled, which is fair enough. I think it locks out certain formats or has a time limit. Can't remember. I did pay for it because I liked its UI and "just works" simplicity, especially with getting audio out of a video file. What I didn't expect was paying AGAIN when they went up a version. Not even a full version, but a ".3" to ".4" version. There was no warning. I was just told I had to pay full price again. I think they have a Larry Ellison in their organisation somewhere.

      WavePad Sound Editor by NCH Software again: US$59.95 for the Standard Edition. Never forked out money for it. It's a stupid amount of money to ask for a glorified Audacity.

      .....and speaking of Audacity: $0. It's free or you can donate money and/or coding skills if you want to support development. I use it. A bit fiddly with getting it to use the LAME.dll happily but I'm fine with that.

    83. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by somersault · · Score: 1

      The PS1 games are only about £3.50 anyway, plus would you be playing them if they weren't free? If they offered something useful like online backup of your account's saves (I play on 2 different PS3s, plus I lost a lot of my saves when my PS3 died :/ ), I might subscribe, but money off some 15 year old games that I still have the discs for isn't really worth it to me. And I doubt it's worth it for even 5% of PS3 users..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    84. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by bronney · · Score: 1

      Was it one long beep and 3 short beeps?

    85. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Tuan121 · · Score: 1

      Xbox live is great. I'm quite sure you don't actually use it, but thanks for commenting.

    86. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      it does mean that people who hacked their consoles with custom firmware and got banned, now get exactly the same level of service as people who didn't!

    87. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      lol, even your wiki article itself states that the Navy frigate's PCs failed on account of someone putting a 0 in the wrong field of a database, causing a divide by zero exception. Yeah, that sounds like a fair judgment...blame MS for the database app programmer's failure.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    88. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      "We cannot rule out the possibility" is corporate-speak for "We don't want to admit it publicly yet, but yeah, it happened." Remember the "We cannot rule out the possibility of a radiation leak" statements that first came out of Fukushima?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    89. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No one should feel safe with ANY retailer these days. It's probably a good idea to always keep a close eye on any credit card that you use for online (and some offline purchases) and keep one specific card reserved (if possible) for such purchases.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    90. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I've used both and here's my take on it.

      PSN has a big upper-hand on cost (free is always nice) and the openess of the network. That openess is what allows them to do thinks like integrating Steam into Portal 2 and supporting MMO's like DC Universe Online. Playstation Home is also kind of neat, and MS has no equivalent "social space." On the downside, the PSN experience is very fragmented and disorganized. There is no sense of cohesion in things like matchmaking. It all feels very hodge-podge.

      Xbox Live has the upper hand on cohesion and organization. The Live interface is consistently implemented. Matchmaking is superior. Every game feels well-integrated into the overall Live experience. It's all very polished. And the Xbox Netflix interface is by far the best I've ever seen (better than Roku, better than the PS3, better than any blu-ray player I've used). The downsides are the cost (way too much to be charging when everyone else is doing it for free), the lack of a social space like Home, and the closed network (for the last few years MS has been openly hostile to MMO's, Steam intergration or anything which might threaten their complete control over their network).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    91. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never met him, or you would know that, in his mind, Sony NEVER makes a mistake and PSN is PERFECT.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    92. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No, just that I'm human, and resent being called stupid for choosing one version of a game over another.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    93. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      If I still had my PS3, I probably would have chosen the PS3 version of Portal 2 as well. But the fanboism of one group mocking another over sometimes fairly trivial differences between versions of games ("The anti-aliasing in my version of such-and-such game is slightly better than you version!") is very tiresome. Ironically, I remember the same thing happening when the Orange Box came out, only it was the Xbox fanboys making fun of the PS3 fanboys on that one. It really seems like the most pointless war in history.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    94. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Don't even joke about it, next they will be offering to "encrypt" your personal data for the low low price of $5/month. Kind of like credit card fraud protection insurance, i.e. it is really the bank's responsibility (in law anyway) but they try to make it sound like it's yours.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    95. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd chalk up their unwillingness to tie into many outside networks (Steam for one) as proof of their caution.

      I'd chalk it up to wanting to be the only way anyone can sell XBOX games online. Why share the profit with Steam?

      MS isn't quite as out-and-out evil as Sony, although locking out third party controllers is getting close, but I imagine their main reason for trying to be secure is to minimise down-time (keep the money rolling in) and to maintain trust so people are confident enough to enter their personal info when making a purchase.

      Sony are not only losing income now, but in the future too. How many people will be willing to re-enter their credit card number after Sony lost it the first time?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    96. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      Your generalisation is without merit. Here is an excellent example:

      Switch Sound Converter by NCH Software out of Australia: US$34.99. All this software does is convert between audio files. That's it. There is a free version that is crippled, which is fair enough. I think it locks out certain formats or has a time limit. Can't remember. I did pay for it because I liked its UI and "just works" simplicity, especially with getting audio out of a video file. What I didn't expect was paying AGAIN when they went up a version. Not even a full version, but a ".3" to ".4" version. There was no warning. I was just told I had to pay full price again. I think they have a Larry Ellison in their organisation somewhere.

      WavePad Sound Editor by NCH Software again: US$59.95 for the Standard Edition. Never forked out money for it. It's a stupid amount of money to ask for a glorified Audacity.

      .....and speaking of Audacity: $0. It's free or you can donate money and/or coding skills if you want to support development. I use it. A bit fiddly with getting it to use the LAME.dll happily but I'm fine with that.

      My generalization is without merit because you can produce an example of the "not" my generalization accounted for? WOW. That's amazing.

    97. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by GNious · · Score: 1

      They are welcome to try - a couple of governments are already asking them why this happened.
      Meanwhile I'll feel less stupid for buying DLC as part of "Ultimate"/"Gold" edition of games, in stores, without giving my financial details to Sony.

      I'm just curious why Sony claims NOW is a good time to do service on PSN. Clearly they should have done this before releasing it.

    98. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Xbox Netflix interface is by far the best I've ever seen

      What? they don't even give you the default virtual keyboard to search for movies. You have to SCROLL through the alphabet for EACH LETTER!! My experience with it was terrible and I'm much happier watching Netflix on PS3, which was still working last night, despite the PSN being down.

    99. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The PS3 has serious buffering issues on HD movies, the 360 plays them smooth as silk. And the fast-forward and rewind implementation are far better on the 360 than PS3. Those are way more important to me than the quality of the virtual keyboard.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    100. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by mortarn · · Score: 1

      PSN Plus added online savefile backups a couple of months ago. It's part of the reason I signed up for it.

    101. Re:There's some karma for you, Mikey by somersault · · Score: 1

      Damn, a few months too late to save my games. At the moment I haven't even restarted stuff like Red Dead Redemption or Oblivion, and I'm done with GT5 for now (with the save file backed up to another drive). I might have a look at a plus account again next time I get into an epic PS3 game.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. Speculation by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I understand that the slashdot community might be anxious to see the PSN come back up, but do we seriously have to start publishing nothing more substantial than speculation?

    Also, I've met Dick Blumenthal. He's a very nice man. However, he is, by no means, "the government", nor does a single letter from a freshman senator constitute "attention from the government".

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Speculation by ThePhish · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are correct, he is not the government...but he was CT's Attorney General for 20 years, and has long championed consumer rights and technology . So, him picking this battle as a freshman senator is technically accurate, but it does not reflect his multi-decade experience in the arena.

    2. Re:Speculation by briansct · · Score: 1

      I second ThePhish's comment about Blumenthal. As a resident of CT I have seen the results of his actions and letters to businesses. I was sad to see him go when he won the senate seat.

      I would be very surprised if Sony did not take him very seriously. He represents a very large voice (yes read it "the US government") that may soon rally behind his simple letter.

      --
      What's the point of Mod points over a long weekend?
    3. Re:Speculation by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      However, he is, by no means, "the government", nor does a single letter from a freshman senator constitute "attention from the government".

      Actually, it does. "The government" is a collection of people doing various jobs paid for out of the Treasury. He is one of those people, currently a member of the legislative branch of the government. Getting attention from any of those people is therefore "attention from the government".

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, here's some "speculation" from Patrick Seybold // Sr. Director, Corporate Communications & Social Media.

      http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/04/26/update-on-playstation-network-and-qriocity/

      "... an unauthorized person has obtained the following information that you provided: name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID. It is also possible that your profile data, including purchase history and billing address (city, state, zip), and your PlayStation Network/Qriocity password security answers may have been obtained. If you have authorized a sub-account for your dependent, the same data with respect to your dependent may have been obtained. While there is no evidence at this time that credit card data was taken, we cannot rule out the possibility. If you have provided your credit card data through PlayStation Network or Qriocity, out of an abundance of caution we are advising you that your credit card number (excluding security code) and expiration date may have been obtained."

      Looks pretty bad to me. Anybody that reads and understands the above will never provide their real name or birthdate to a corporation online again. Ever.

    5. Re:Speculation by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I understand that the slashdot community might be anxious to see the PSN come back up, but do we seriously have to start publishing nothing more substantial than speculation?

      When it's that interesting, when there's not much other information to go on, when it's explicitly marked as speculation/hypothesis without any pretense that it's more authoritative than that, AND when the speculation is over something as inconsequential as a videogame network, I don't see any harm.

      -It is exactly the type of story that we would be interested in, moreso if and when it becomes more than speculation.

      -Sony is basically encouraging speculation by keeping tight-lipped about it.

      -Doesn't degrade slashdot's credibility, since it was marked as speculation and this is slashdot...

      -Unlike speculation about, say, the situation with the Fukushima reactor in Japan, publishing speculation is never going to create a dangerous situation

      I see nothing wrong here.

    6. Re:Speculation by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Also, I've met Dick Blumenthal. He's a very nice man.

      He's a politician. He has to be personable. That doesn't mean he's nice, just nice to you on the occasion that you met him.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Speculation by catchblue22 · · Score: 2

      I always was very hesitant to provide Sony with my credit card. I simply don't trust them. I hate the way the PS3 always tries to dump you into the Playstation Store. It just feels obnoxious and disrespectful. And now hearing about their technical negligence, I am even more happy with my decision. Honestly, I have never had any need or desire to buy anything on PSN.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    8. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked in highly regulated industries, I disagree. A single letter from a freshman senator most definitely does costitute "attention from the government". He is PART of the government and he has turned his attention to the PSN issue. The way political news cycles work it could turn into nothing or an all out media explosion where the facts cease to matter and it's a game of perception manipulation. It all depends on who all gets interested so you should totally fear that first "single letter from a freshman senator" if you don't already have your ducks in a row.

    9. Re:Speculation by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Looks pretty bad to me. Anybody that reads and understands the above will never provide their real name or birthdate to a corporation online again. Ever.

      Good luck with that. Moving out to Amish country, are we? :)

      Seriously, just for example, as time goes on you probably won't be able to make an appointment with your doctor or see the results of the blood test without accessing the clinic's online chart system. One hopes that the clinic's security is better than Sony's, of course.

      I'm afraid that in this, Zuckerberg is right - 'privacy is an illusion'. With security barriers falling down left and right, encryption schemes becoming compromised faster than new ones can be contrived, and all the tools of society becoming digitalized, effectively everything about each of us will be public, at least for those who desire to know. Even homeless folks are largely in the system already. 1984 was a mere shadow of the depth of knowledge that Big Brother will know.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    10. Re:Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody that reads and understands the above will never provide their real name or birthdate to a corporation online again. Ever.

      I'm a bit ticked off about the CC number (although you basically need to assume that sucker is compromised before you even receive the card), but I provided I-can't-believe-it's-not-data (TM) for the remainder, because that data is available on a need-to-know basis, and they didn't pass muster. Heck, even the email, username and password were different to anything else I use.

    11. Re:Speculation by RussellSHarris · · Score: 1

      He said their "real" name and birthdate. Like this:

      Russell S. Harris, 7/26/1978

  3. government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    why is the PSN outage any of the (US?) government's business?

    1. Re:government? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is there anything that isn't government business anymore?

    2. Re:government? by kevinNCSU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      why is the PSN outage any of the (US?) government's business?

      Because Senators are suppose to represent their constituents and the issues they care about (lets leave the vote pandering cynicism discussion as off-topic for now) and his constituents are worried their personal/financial details were compromised in the attack so it makes sense that he would ask Sony whether or not this is the case as he has a better chance of being responded to because he wields more power.

    3. Re:government? by Chemicles · · Score: 1

      I know it's cool to bash anything the government does, but the senator in question is probably interested in Sony's protection (or lack thereof) of users' financial data which, as far as I know, Sony can't guarantee wasn't compromised.

    4. Re:government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does seem strange that such a company would matter, but in a way, they should: anything that keeps the population sedate should be supported by big G.

    5. Re:government? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that whole 17th ammendment ship already sailed, AC. Let it go.

    6. Re:government? by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Senators are supposed to represent their state. Representatives are supposed to represent their constituents.

      Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the state made up of constituents?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    7. Re:government? by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Senators are supposed to represent their state. Representatives are supposed to represent their constituents.

      Unless I missed a memo and the Senators are all now versions of the Lorax and speak for the trees for the trees have no tongues I'm pretty sure by representing "their state" it means they represent the people in their state, who authorized the senator to act as an agent on their behalf by voting them in, thereby making them: constituents.

    8. Re:government? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Do you ignore first 16 amendments as well?

    9. Re:government? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Senators are supposed to represent their state. Representatives are supposed to represent their constituents.

      Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the state made up of constituents?

      He meant the state governments, but as someone else already pointed out, the 17th Amendment changed that.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    10. Re:government? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Yes, but of constituents of more than one congressional district.

      Senators represent the state; Representatives only represent their constituents, and unless their House seat is an at-large seat, their constituents are not the entire state.

    11. Re:government? by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      why is the PSN outage any of the (US?) government's business?

      Why would you even question that? Preventing citizens from being harmed or abused by others, whether they be foreign armies, domestic criminals, or large corporations skirting or possibly even breaking the law, is precisely the most fundamental function of any government. There are regulations dictating how a corporation must handle user's information precisely because of this, and there's good reason to believe Sony ain't following them at the moment. Are you suggesting governments should just ignore their job and not enforce laws or address threats to their citizens merely because it's a corporation that did them rather than an individual or a foreign power, and therefore somehow above the law?

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    12. Re:government? by KarrdeSW · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Senators are supposed to represent their state. Representatives are supposed to represent their constituents.

      This is why they sprinkle Constituent Service offices around their states where they employ constituent service representatives?

      Also, they call them constituents because constituents are defined as the entities being represented. Therefore, even if your statement is correct, the state would still be a constituent.

    13. Re:government? by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Because the "Bread and Circuses" ploy is already missing the bread for a lot of people, and things might blow if they lose the circuses, too.

    14. Re:government? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Because stealing everyone's credit card and personal information is a crime.

      OJ Murdred someone, GEE why is the government involved?

    15. Re:government? by Nothing2Chere · · Score: 1

      It's because Sony wants to show everyone how the jailbreaking of their devices has put their customers in jeopardy of identity theft.

      I can't believe that this big of an outage is anything other than a fulcrum to getting the feds to help strong-arm more people who have installed the jailbreak.

      n2ch - move along

    16. Re:government? by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      The term constituents isn't narrowly defined to congressional districts, or even just the United States. It means any group of people who elect an agent to act on their behalf. So it is true that representatives have constituents of only a single congressional district, but it is equally true that a senator's constituents is the set of all the people in their state. Likewise, all Americans are the President's constituents whose interests he should be representing on the world stage.

    17. Re:government? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      I hadn't originally noticed from the comment Anonymous posted that he was trying to argue that Senators don't represent "constituents". The point I was trying to make was simply that the Representative doesn't represent the entire state. So while "constituents" and "state" are synonymous for a Senator, they are not for a Representative.

      So it would be correct to say either... Senators represent their state, and they represent their constituents, i.e. the citizens of that state.

    18. Re:government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is the PSN outage any of the (US?) government's business?

      Someone told them there was oil to be found there.

  4. Nothing else to do? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0

    Senators and Representatives going after Apple, now Sony, aren't there other goddamned things they should be working on?

    1. Re:Nothing else to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh yes..
      Because people who paid for services that they aren't getting is not important at all. Especially after that same company advertised Linux running on their PS3 and then on a whim changed their minds and screwed plenty of people over...

      Not to mention Apple's careless tracking of the users' every move...

      Nope, not important at all... Let's just let these companies do whatever they want. /sarcasm.

    2. Re:Nothing else to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um. Senator Blumenthal *was* going to be playing Portal 2 in coop mode with his state's senior Senator, but they can't do that while the PSN is down. Therefore the letter. Duh.

      RTFA, etc.

        I mean, I assume that's what it says. Not that I'd read it.

    3. Re:Nothing else to do? by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Nope. Everyone else already paid up their campaign contributions and lobbying fees.

    4. Re:Nothing else to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you care so much then why don't you run for political office? If you won't/can't get elected then you could at least be campaigning for someone you support. Obviously you don't actually care about or participate in politics - otherwise you would be unable to justify wasting your time complaining on Slashdot.

      Or, as one Slashdot poster put it: "aren't there other goddamned things [you] should be working on?"

    5. Re:Nothing else to do? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0

      PSN is free.

      The Apple, Google and Sony issues should be handled by the fracking Federal agencies who deal with these issues, the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection, the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice, along with the state agencies that do the same thing.

    6. Re:Nothing else to do? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what happened, or his kid complained.

    7. Re:Nothing else to do? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Senators and Representatives going after Apple, now Sony, aren't there other goddamned things they should be working on?

      There are, and they are. A government, being composed of many, many individuals, is capable of working on many, many things at the same time. Thus, an argument along the lines of "isn't there something else they should be working on" is always utterly moronic...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:Nothing else to do? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I'm not running for an office because it's an off year and because my Senators and Representatives are doing a good job and not getting wrapped up in political grandstanding on this issue, but as a voter I have every right to complain about other politicians.

      And no, really there's nothing else I need to be working on right now, thanks for asking.

    9. Re:Nothing else to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't complaining on Slashdot *ACTUALLY* a form of protest? Any time I stand in a room and shout about an issue I'm making a "political statement". Next you'll say the candidates are wasting their time advertising on TV and debating when there's "other goddamned things they could be working on". I'd be incredibly surprised if there's never been a grassroots campaign in the history of Slashdot servers that hasn't hit these forums in some way. I'd also be surprised if you haven't read some form of political material on these servers either. How do you know the people you're talking to aren't in some way politically motivated??

      Politics is really just about getting people to do what you want; first step is to tell them what's wrong, next step is to tell them how you'll put it right, next step is not putting it right and siphoning all the budget off into a Swiss bank account.

    10. Re:Nothing else to do? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Senators and Representatives going after Apple, now Sony, aren't there other goddamned things they should be working on?

      Than writing a letter? We're not talking about a $5 million investigation.

    11. Re:Nothing else to do? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Hearings cost time and money.

      Remember that Congress didn't get a final budget for 2010-11 done until a few days ago, when it should have been done by October 1 2010.

      So sure, they can monkey around getting sidetracked because they've proven to be such great managers of time and schedules.

    12. Re:Nothing else to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS3, however, is not free. PSN service, for a reasonable timeframe (i.e. at least the lifetime of the console plus a couple years), was an advertised feature of the PS3 when it was purchased for money. It is reasonable to assume that many players bought their PS3s with this service in mind (as well as the people who picked up Portal 2 with the PS3-to-PC gameplay in mind). It is also reasonable to assume Sony should competently handle their network. Being organized in a way that allows an attacker (allegedly) with a simple third-party dev account to access credit card data is grossly negligent to the userbase. An intrusion attack (not a DDoS) so bad that it brings down the entire network of a large, multinational, stupidly large conglomerate company for five days straight (and counting) would, to me at least, indicate there are significant problems beyond whatever Sony is saying publicly, leading me right back to "gross negligence with customer data".

      Just because a service has no recurring subscription does not mean the company operating it has no legal responsibility.

    13. Re:Nothing else to do? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "PSN is free."

      PSN Plus is *NOT* Free.

      Do you even own a PS3? Have you been on the PSN?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  5. Valve by bazald · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be nice to be able to activate the PC version included with my PS3 copy of Portal 2. You're in a somewhat unique position to improve matters, given that you were planning to make the PC version available to us anyway.

    --
    Insert self-referential sig here.
    1. Re:Valve by Tukz · · Score: 1

      I'm on this boat as well.
      I see my roommate and several of my steam friends play Portal 2, but I can't log into PSN with my PS3 version to unlock my PC version.

      I'm somewhat surprised that Valve didn't do something about this by now or at least made an official statement, the forum is running rather hot.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    2. Re:Valve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a great idea, except for this part, if true:

      "An "unauthorized person" has PSN users' "name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID." Billing address, password questions, and credit card info may also have been taken."

      Mmmmmmm.... no. I think the last thing that Valve would want at the moment is any potential crossover between the compromised PSN and their Steam system. Talk about bad timing. It's a shame, but you're probably better off waiting until Sony sorts things out.

      Oh, and in case it isn't obvious, if you have both a PSN and Steam account and they use any of the same information (like e-mail address, login name and password), it would be a *really* good time to change the Steam info.

    3. Re:Valve by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I think the last thing that Valve would want at the moment is any potential crossover between the compromised PSN and their Steam system.

      Or any perceived crossover. PSN has the plague!

    4. Re:Valve by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      If Netflix still works then it's odd that Portal 2 for PS3 can't simply talk directly to Steam. Unless Sony required Valve to proxy the request via PSN or something stupid.

      --
      this is my sig
    5. Re:Valve by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Huh, I played Portal 2 all the way through on the PS3 the day it came out, and then went and put the code into my computer "just because". I don't remember having to activate it via the PS3 first, though I suppose it's possible. This was all just hours before the outage started (as far as I can tell) so I guess I was just lucky :)

      They give you a slip of paper with a cd key on it in the PS3 game case, why isn't that enough to activate the PC version?

    6. Re:Valve by Tukz · · Score: 1

      Which they kind of did.
      You need to log in to PSN to link your PSN account to your Steam account.

      After it's linked, I'm not sure if it still needs PSN though, since I can't link it to see.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  6. Sony Shills out in Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be the paranoid type, but when the first 5 of 10 comments are kiss-ass "thank you's", it starts to raise red flags. Thank you for what? A nebulous useless update that they are denying you service, and have no idea when their service will be backup? I know that there are Sony Fanboys, but I can't imagine any Fan boy being happy about being denied internet gaming for a week... Especially happy enough to thank the company that is preventing them from playing, and has basically been lying from the start.

    Am I just paranoid? Is there a legitimate reason to thank that guy for a useless update?

    1. Re:Sony Shills out in Force by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      Mod up, AC has a point. Pretty much every Sony/PS3/PSN-related article that's been posted, both here and elsewhere, since the start of the Geohot debacle has been rife with the same generic "Geohot is a total douchebag. I don't need to know any details, just look at him!" or "Hackers should all be thrown in jail for life" or "You agreed to the ToS! Nobody can do anything against Sony now!" comments. I know GamesRadar was particularly bad about it but I'm sure there were others too. It's pretty clear that Sony has at least some "reputation preservation agents" working on this matter to try to steer public opinion toward their favour.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  7. Theory, speculation, bullshit. by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One theory about the cause behind the network's downtime was recently espoused on Reddit by 'chesh,' a moderator at PlayStation-modding enthusiast site PSX-Scene.com. According to him, ... [snip]
    He acknowledges that this theory is speculation.

    Slashdot should to change its moniker to "Jerry Springer for Nerds". All that's missing is a video feed of some grimy sweat pants wearing nerds furiously typing away virtual beatdowns over who got who's virtual girlfriend knocked up.

    This whole "new media" thing is unconvincing.

    1. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      nerds furiously typing away virtual beatdowns over who got who's virtual girlfriend knocked up.

      There was no need to bring the G word into the conversation, that's just uncalled for.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by makubesu · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the network is down because of aliens trying to connect to it.

    3. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      At least the update with the official statement from sony has some content. Not technical content particularly, but at least content.

    4. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      He did say virtual girlfriend. Hell, it could be a 40 year old man for all he knows.

    5. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      This whole "new media" thing is unconvincing.

      On the other hand, even with nothing but rumour and unconfirmed speculation, it's still out-performing traditional media on this topic. I haven't even heard of the outage on Australian media; it's hard to hear anything over the clamour the newsies are making over the royal shindig.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    6. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      it had content. we think it had content. actually, we're not sure - the DRM was such that no one could read it.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      "Slashdot should to change its moniker to "Jerry Springer for Nerds". All that's missing is a video feed of some grimy sweat pants wearing nerds furiously typing away virtual beatdowns over vi or emacs."

      There, fixed that for you. :)

    8. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? That's surprising, considering a lot of the UK news sites are all over it - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13192359 - and it's coming close to beating the number of reader comments on the royal wedding - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/have_your_say

      Of course, I'm assuming that you're not reading the Aussie version of the Daily Mail? Royalty are like celebrities with super-polarized public views - it's a flame war waiting to happen, and tabloids love that shit.

    9. Re:Theory, speculation, bullshit. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I read the Sydney Morning Herald; not a tabloid, but you wouldn't know it with some of the stories it runs. If it's an Australian newspaper, it's either going to be the Herald (broadsheet) or the Telegraph (tabloid). You may get the odd Australian (business broadsheet) in there too.

      The outage made headlines today, after Sony announced the data leak. The outage, prior to that, I hadn't heard a peep about.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  8. LOL by Threni · · Score: 1

    You seriously believe that Sony would disable all access to it's multiplayer games, movie sharing etc, because someone's temporarily able to use one of their devices as a dev console? I think that overblows Sony's interest in homebrew.

    1. Re:LOL by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2

      You seemed to have missed the part where dev consoles can get unlimited funds to buy content from the PSN store.

    2. Re:LOL by tao · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't make any sense though. The PSN store can be closed down without disabling the rest of PSN.

    3. Re:LOL by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      dev consoles can get unlimited funds to buy content from the PSN store

      If they use fake CC numbers.

      But TFS was definitely pretty unclear about that.

      So from what I gather, the gist of the (speculative) reason goes like this:

      Rebug allows you to unlock dev features in the console; some proxy magic then allows you access the developer network with your unlocked console, and if you're on the "trusted" dev network it doesn't bother to verify that you use a valid CC number when you make a purchase. Result: Sony hastily shuts down the network.

    4. Re:LOL by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Alright then: multiplayer hackers/cheaters can easily work around bans and start hacking again.

    5. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a few fake CC numbers Sony gives to developers. They can be used for testing out all sorts of things while developing for the PS3.

    6. Re:LOL by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing they're actually the "test" CC numbers that the credit agencies created for that purpose, but end-user systems should explicitly be designed to reject them, because the credit card check will approve any purchase made with that number.

    7. Re:LOL by Kagato · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be easier just to F with the dev network for a week or so and leave the prod one alone. It just seems like you could selectively turn off some servers of get some fire wall rules to deal with the Dev Console issue.

    8. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can it? I would not be surprised if the systems were sufficiently coupled as to not be able to shut just a piece down.

    9. Re:LOL by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking too. I'm guessing the real reason it has been shut down is unpublicized. If I had to take a stab in the dark, I would say that it was something along the lines of: "We've analyzed their attack, sir, and there is a danger..." Sony probably realized that there was a vulnerability present that would inevitably be exploited, and it required a significant amount of work to fix. Or it's possible that someone already did exploit it to access personal information or do something else that's more critical than just pirate games, and Sony has kept it quiet.

    10. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should, if you define "end-user systems" to be "NOT developer systems". It'd be hard to develop something that depends on accepting/rejecting credit card data if the dev system ALSO rejects the test cards. If speculation is accurate (an assumption which, in and of itself, is a speculation on top of a speculation), Rebug is able to make the PS3s into dev boxes, at least to the point where the credit card auth system accepts them.

      Of course, in my opinion, this is sounding more and more like Sony just assumed the single point of failure was enough to secure the entire system ("system" including the PS3, PSN, etc) with no redundancies, no security on the server end, and depending on their own overconfidence and arrogance to keep everyone out if the shit ever hit the fan.

    11. Re:LOL by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      They should, if you define "end-user systems" to be "NOT developer systems". It'd be hard to develop something that depends on accepting/rejecting credit card data if the dev system ALSO rejects the test cards.

      That depends on how you define "developer". Should a developer for the PS3 be able to use a test CC number to test their own DLC? Probably. Should they be able to download anything off the entire network using it? Probably not... so you should still be doing some basic common-sense checks before blindly authorizing the download.

      Of course, in my opinion, this is sounding more and more like Sony just assumed the single point of failure was enough to secure the entire system ("system" including the PS3, PSN, etc) with no redundancies, no security on the server end, and depending on their own overconfidence and arrogance to keep everyone out if the shit ever hit the fan.

      Well... yeah, probably.

    12. Re:LOL by praxis · · Score: 1

      That's not how they work. Credit card processors have two end-point APIs: one that accepts real transactions and rejects test numbers and one that accepts test transactions and rejects real numbers. The system in the middle--the PSN store here--can act otherwise, but the credit card processor will not accept a fake number on a live system.

    13. Re:LOL by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

      You seemed to have missed the part where dev consoles can get unlimited funds to buy content from the PSN store.

      Like a fool I'm in a cage I cannot get out you see I'm trapped..... Colonel Abrahams

      --
      All cows eat grass!
    14. Re:LOL by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Then they would get all kinds of complaints because some features would work and other random one wouldn't. Doing the above would be a buggy mess. You would also need faith that your system works. But Sony recently fired their security people. They brought in an independent security company to handle this. Sony leadership has no faith that the systems people know what they are doing. And why should they. Turning it off decreases their liability. When they go in front of the US Senate or EU panel a year from now they can say "We turned if off as soon as we found there was a problem. Then we had the best people look into it". Half steps will just cost them money in the long run. This is a relatively good time to have an outage. Spring and summer are traditionally slow periods anyway. They want to get this fixed solid. They don't want to have to turn it off again 5 months from now in the middle of fall. From a systems perspective it is way easier to fix a system that is not in production. It gives you more freedom to do a good job.

  9. "Almost a week?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some of us, the PlayStation Network has effectively been "down" since April 1, 2010.

    Welcome to my world.

  10. Sony's Silence says it all by Goffee71 · · Score: 2

    At least Amazon were up front about the failure and remedy for its service... Sony should be learning that lesson - fast! http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/the-aftermath-amazon-ec2-sony-playstation-network-recover-from-cloud-crashes-010954.php

    --
    If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    1. Re:Sony's Silence says it all by Goffee71 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, Sony takes that very minute to make full confession:

      Press the NUKE button now!

      Thank you for your patience while we work to resolve the current outage of PlayStation Network & Qriocity services. We are currently working to send a similar message to the one below via email to all of our registered account holders regarding a compromise of personal information as a result of an illegal intrusion on our systems. These malicious actions have also had an impact on your ability to enjoy the services provided by PlayStation Network and Qriocity including online gaming and online access to music, movies, sports and TV shows. We have a clear path to have PlayStation Network and Qriocity systems back online, and expect to restore some services within a week.

      We’re working day and night to ensure it is done as quickly as possible. We appreciate your patience and feedback.



      Valued PlayStation Network/Qriocity Customer: We have discovered that between April 17 and April 19, 2011, certain PlayStation Network and Qriocity service user account information was compromised in connection with an illegal and unauthorized intrusion into our network. In response to this intrusion, we have:

      Temporarily turned off PlayStation Network and Qriocity services; Engaged an outside, recognized security firm to conduct a full and complete investigation into what happened; and Quickly taken steps to enhance security and strengthen our network infrastructure by re-building our system to provide you with greater protection of your personal information.

      We greatly appreciate your patience, understanding and goodwill as we do whatever it takes to resolve these issues as quickly and efficiently as practicable. Although we are still investigating the details of this incident, we believe that an unauthorized person has obtained the following information that you provided: name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID. It is also possible that your profile data, including purchase history and billing address (city, state, zip), and your PlayStation Network/Qriocity password security answers may have been obtained. If you have authorized a sub-account for your dependent, the same data with respect to your dependent may have been obtained. While there is no evidence at this time that credit card data was taken, we cannot rule out the possibility. If you have provided your credit card data through PlayStation Network or Qriocity, out of an abundance of caution we are advising you that your credit card number (excluding security code) and expiration date may have been obtained. For your security, we encourage you to be especially aware of email, telephone, and postal mail scams that ask for personal or sensitive information. Sony will not contact you in any way, including by email, asking for your credit card number, social security number or other personally identifiable information. If you are asked for this information, you can be confident Sony is not the entity asking. When the PlayStation Network and Qriocity services are fully restored, we strongly recommend that you log on and change your password. Additionally, if you use your PlayStation Network or Qriocity user name or password for other unrelated services or accounts, we strongly recommend that you change them, as well. To protect against possible identity theft or other financial loss, we encourage you to remain vigilant, to review your account statements and to monitor your credit reports. We are providing the following information for those who wish to consider it: U.S. residents are entitled under U.S. law to one free credit report annually from each of the three major credit bureaus. To order your free credit report, visit www.annualcreditreport.com or call toll-free (877) 322-8228. We have also provided names and contact information for the three major U.S. credit bureaus below. At no charge, U.S. res

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    2. Re:Sony's Silence says it all by The13thSin · · Score: 2

      Also possibly relevant is the PSN Outage FAQ they posted: [link].

      --
      "This should be fun, and by fun, I mean a wholly depressing insight into the cognitive ability of some grown adults."
    3. Re:Sony's Silence says it all by DaveGod · · Score: 2

      For your security, we encourage you to be especially aware of email, telephone, and postal mail scams that ask for personal or sensitive information.

      Thanks for that advice.

      Good to know I should take my sensitive information seriously.

      Thanks for the concern.

      No, really.

      Thanks.

    4. Re:Sony's Silence says it all by JesusH8sMe · · Score: 1

      Their response is totally unacceptable. A few links to already free services? I have already used up my 1 free credit report for the year. How about a link to enroll in a year long monitoring program where i can watch my credit activity regularly? This is what another company has offered me in the past...

    5. Re:Sony's Silence says it all by derfy · · Score: 1

      Q.17 There seems to be some games that cannot be played even offline?

      Depending on the game titles, but mainly PSN games, some may require access to PSN for trophy sync, security check, etc.

      Boom. WTG, Sony.

  11. why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Dan667 · · Score: 0

    sony is obviously not going to do what is in your interest.

  12. Official word from Sony finally by ShaggusMacHaggis · · Score: 5, Informative

    "We have discovered that between April 17 and April 19, 2011, certain PlayStation Network and Qriocity service user account information was compromised in connection with an illegal and unauthorized intrusion into our network.

    Although we are still investigating the details of this incident, we believe that an unauthorized person has obtained the following information that you provided: name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID. It is also possible that your profile data, including purchase history and billing address (city, state, zip), and your PlayStation Network/Qriocity password security answers may have been obtained. If you have authorized a sub-account for your dependent, the same data with respect to your dependent may have been obtained. While there is no evidence at this time that credit card data was taken, we cannot rule out the possibility. If you have provided your credit card data through PlayStation Network or Qriocity, out of an abundance of caution we are advising you that your credit card number (excluding security code) and expiration date may have been obtained.
    "

    http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/04/26/update-on-playstation-network-and-qriocity/

    1. Re:Official word from Sony finally by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      So basically "all your personal data, which we hold, because reams of data is fun, was probably copied by someone." As Barney says, "Good luck out there buddy, you're gonna need it."

    2. Re:Official word from Sony finally by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      Since PSN is free, I imagine most people haven't given it their credit card info. (unless they're buying DLC).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Official word from Sony finally by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a PSN+ service that is non-free? I figure even though they have, what 75 million accounts, if even 1% of those had a PSN+ account, that's a lot of data.

    4. Re:Official word from Sony finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think they'd send an email to PSN members, to alert them about the compromise, rather than assuming 60-70m users are going to be polling a fucking blog page!

    5. Re:Official word from Sony finally by subanark · · Score: 1

      Wait... the passwords/security answers should have been encrypted, so unless they are being overly cautious about someone trying to generate passwords that match every hash (plus salt), or just some they are interested in there is not much to fear. Also the credit card number should not even be on their systems at all, they should have gotten a buyer code from the credit card company which they can simply invalidate (unless they think that someone may have inserted monitoring code in their system, in which case your credit card number is only in danger if you entered into their system recently).

    6. Re:Official word from Sony finally by msavory · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and it seems those that do don't even read it correctly... From the 2nd line "We are currently working to send a similar message to the one below via email to all of our registered account holders regarding a compromise of personal information as a result of an illegal intrusion on our systems."

    7. Re:Official word from Sony finally by wbav · · Score: 2

      This is Sony.

      Security isn't their strong suit.

      --

      =================
      Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    8. Re:Official word from Sony finally by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      Wait... the passwords/security answers should have been encrypted

      Emphasis: mine
      This will be fun. I'm hoping some form of external inquiry will take place post mop-up operation to confirm that Sony was indeed using best practices for securing it's data.

    9. Re:Official word from Sony finally by sycorob · · Score: 1

      I have my credit card on file with them. I bought the "Walking Dead" premier because I missed it and couldn't find it anywhere (didn't want to torrent it). So that's another way to get screwed.

      It sounds like they encrypted the card numbers at least, which is why they are thinking the card numbers are safe. Annoyingly, some douchebag now has my full name, billing address, and date of birth (why does Sony need that??). Thanks, Sony, now I have to worry about some hacker trying to steal my identity, because you couldn't be bothered to encrypt a couple of database fields.

      I can at least cancel my credit cards. My full identity is more valuable to identity thieves, and more damaging to me.

    10. Re:Official word from Sony finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you wanted to purchase even one single game for download... then you've got to put in a CC#.

    11. Re:Official word from Sony finally by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Address is needed for billing purposes. DOB is needed to ensure they don't sell violent video games to minors.

      The thing I'm most pissed about is that none of this data was hashed. At the very least, they should have hashed the CC# and passwords.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    12. Re:Official word from Sony finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck was any of that data accessible through the internet?

    13. Re:Official word from Sony finally by thehodapp · · Score: 1

      This is Sony. We're good at law suits.

    14. Re:Official word from Sony finally by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      and the security answers! I wonder if anybody has picked the "mother's maiden name" option, in that case that would make identity theft even easier...

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    15. Re:Official word from Sony finally by realxmp · · Score: 1

      Should have hashed the passwords certainly but a hashed CC# is useless for billing. Better to keep it on an isolated payment processing server. I'm wondering if they're going to get screwed on PCI-DSS for this particular debacle.

    16. Re:Official word from Sony finally by Ganthor · · Score: 2

      Yes that's correct, most would not have put their credit card information up there...unless they bought stuff online from them. *If* you've been through the sign-up procedure with them you'll know that they require a LOT of information. I was concerned at the time I signed up for this very reason. There was information that could help someone pretend to be me to the bank over the phone or to identify all the home addresses with PS3's to go get them.

      I ended up creating a bogus person - I am now glad I did and don't feel like such a paranoid dick any more. - In fact this caused me to start a standard fake person for all sign on ID's.

      Companies that require all this information to use their services should really consider what information they really need and what information are they willing to be responsible for. I tell you what, if people start getting scammed or ID stolen as a result of this, Sony better be willing cough up every last cent in compensation. Sure someone attacked their network, but by *requiring* people to enter this information they are assuming responsibility for protecting it. (I bet the expansive EULA and privacy statement say nothing about this).

    17. Re:Official word from Sony finally by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about that. It seems to me that there is Alice, Bob, and Charlie.

      Alice needs to authorize Bob to take money from Charlie that Alice will pay back in the future.

      Alice could do a one-time authentication with Bob, Bob would do an authentication with Charlie. Bob could hash Alice's number and Charlie could store the hash of Bob's hash.

      Basically, Alice and Charlie could have a secret number that Bob could never (if properly salted) decode.

      To take it a step further, the secret number could revolve based on timestamps; say refreshing every 6 hours. As long as Alice and Charlie's clocks were synched (radio isotope decay), then you could have a super-secure CC# processing system.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    18. Re:Official word from Sony finally by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      (I bet the expansive EULA and privacy statement say nothing about this)

      It probably does, actually; something along the lines of, "we aren't responsible for anything that happens, ever."

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    19. Re:Official word from Sony finally by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 1

      No need to re-invent Kerberos - authentication is a solved problem.

    20. Re:Official word from Sony finally by realxmp · · Score: 1

      Sounds like symmetric key encryption with HMAC (hash message authentication code) to me. The problem is generating that HMAC at Alice's end, customers want to be able to pay online anywhere. There have been proposals to build a pad into the card, but this isn't going anywhere fast at the moment (costs and the fact that your average credit card lives in the school of hard knocks, keypads are a bit too fragile).

    21. Re:Official word from Sony finally by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Wait are you sayingSony held on to super secret data such as my name or gasp my address? Why would they need my billing address??? An address is literally 5 reams of data they don't need. GASP Sony keeps track of my email address GASP why I didn't know they had that. I assumed they shredded the reams of data everytime I logged in with it. GASP not my birthday not even my parents know my birthday ..

    22. Re:Official word from Sony finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is fucking Sony, and those wankers thought "Ooooh, our console is soooooo secure, we can trust the client. Now hand me the baby oil!"
      Their security engineers need to be shot, quartered, beheaded and burned at many small stakes so they never, ever touch customer data again.

    23. Re:Official word from Sony finally by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I went through the process several years ago. But I don't think I ever had any reason to give them my CC number at least (I don't recall ever buying anything from them). Guess I'm on the list too, though. Wish I had thought of creating a bogus person. That's probably a pretty good general security tip these days, though. "Never give your real name."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  13. Take note by ravyne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the rumor is indeed true that a custom firmware has been used to get some people free stuff, take note how Sony has handled the situation -- A small, small portion of people (the few that run custom firmware, and the fewer that run this particular custom firmware) are getting a few free (virtual) goods, and they shut down the entire network, screwing 100% of their customers.

    What if banks operated this way? They find a ring of fraudsters using bank accounts to commit fraud, and the bank responds by freezing everyone's accounts for weeks? It would be totally unacceptable.

    When you find a small group of fraudsters, you take targeted action against them alone, even if it means you hemorrhage a little money compared to the more totalitarian approach. Its part of the cost of doing business. In the retail world they call it "spillage" -- the fact that some of your goods might get damaged beyond saleability or that a few things will go missing from the floor (or the stock room) is unavoidable -- you simply do your best to detect and take action against those responsible, but you don't go around treating every other customer as a criminal.

    Of course, that assumes the rumored reason is the cause of this action -- I suspect its either speculation or a (possibly intentionally-leaked) cover story for other measures taken in response to the Anonymous attack and whatever information they got out of GeoHot in the settlement. I anticipate a new official firmware will be required after the network comes back up and it will be necessary to access the "new" PSN, and possibly even already-owned downloadable content. This long of a downtime indicates pretty drastic changes behind the scenes, methinks.

    1. Re:Take note by Schadrach · · Score: 1

      Assuming that that hack is what this is all about, wouldn't it have been simpler to shut off "developer" PSN for however long, rather than all PSN? It's not adding up.

    2. Re:Take note by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nope, all personal data stored with your PSN account has been compromised. It's taken this long for the forensic team to verify what people suspected. Everything including name, address, birth date, the answers to your account reset questions (used by *many* sites), email address, and *passwords* (haven't they heard of a f'ing hash!). Obviously Sony has a worst case scenario here and they wanted to be absolutely sure it was as bad as they feared before coming forward. This probably means legal trouble for them in the EU, and it might actually get Congress off their arse to enact some privacy legislation.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Take note by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      If the rumor is indeed true that a custom firmware has been used to get some people free stuff, take note how Sony has handled the situation -- A small, small portion of people (the few that run custom firmware, and the fewer that run this particular custom firmware) are getting a few free (virtual) goods, and they shut down the entire network, screwing 100% of their customers.

      It's Sony's custom.

      Think about it. GeoHot did a mostly theoretical demonstration of a possible flaw in the PS3 hardware (RAM glitching - something that's almost impossible to protect against at the consumer level). It was unreliable, it didn't work 100%, and it required special hardware and physical modification to your PS3. But showing the demo once, Sony decided OtherOS was a security risk and removed it on all consoles afterwards.

      All for a tiny hard to use and accomplish hack. Even if it was put in modchip form somehow it would still not work 100%.

      For that, they remove OtherOS. Because it "might" lead to piracy.

      To top it off, the PS3 security was broken not using OtherOS (it was removed, remember?) but using some other vulnerability by guys trying to get OtherOS back, leaving the entire system broken.

      So no, Sony overreacting isn't unusual. And sometimes the skilled people who'll hack your hardware anyways should be given their due. Microsoft learned it for the original Xbox (they were given ample opportunity to allow Linux on it, otherwise they'd have to use a vulnerability which was kept secret until Microsoft denied their request, at which point it was public and the pirates then took the next step at enabling piracy via the vulnerability).

    4. Re:Take note by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *passwords* (haven't they heard of a f'ing hash!)

      This is the company that used a constant instead of a random value to feed a critical encryption algorithm in their flagship product. You really think they understand password security? Even if they hashed the passwords, what do you figure the odds are that they salted, much less peppered, them? Apply rainbow tables and go home happy, since i can't imagine many of the users would have bothered with a particularly secure password.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    5. Re:Take note by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      In the retail world they call it "spillage" -- the fact that some of your goods might get damaged beyond saleability or that a few things will go missing from the floor (or the stock room) is unavoidable -- you simply do your best to detect and take action against those responsible, but you don't go around treating every other customer as a criminal.

      You started talking about Sony, but seem to have ended up talking about Best Buy.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:Take note by Seumas · · Score: 1

      The best way to force the issue of requiring an "internet ID" authorized by governments and to really crack down on perceived piracy and homebrew and white-hat-hacking (for personal use / edification, etc) is by creating an emergency situation of epic proportions that you blame on the people you want to target. All of a sudden, you'll have the consumer on your side as well as the government. Governments have been doing this for ages.

    7. Re:Take note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, if they shut it down to stop people getting freebies at detriment of genuine customers. I pay for PS3 games because of the quality and size of the games. Even if there was a backdoor to get free games etc I would not do it because it is likely to be tracable. I would also not trust a hack, that's why I would never ever torrent a game with a potential hidden virus. I think they have been hacked, had details stolen, network/servers corrupted and they have no backup/contingency. Basically one huge mess.

    8. Re:Take note by tusam · · Score: 1

      He did much more than that, apparently he also brought down PSN and told someone how to reset COD stats
      http://www.facebook.com/pages/I-Hate-George-Hotz-For-Hacking-PS3-Fuing-Prk/102828309796766

      That's what happens when these ignorant illiterate dummies learn to associate a name to a thing, doesn't matter what he actually did, PS3+hack=? "George did it! Tar and feathers!"
      And that was his downfall, to promote a name and provide a target (at least a better one than a faceless corporation).
      Had he cured cancer it'd still all come down to "I heard he did something, then Sony did something and something bad happened to my PS3, what an asshole".

    9. Re:Take note by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Its a shame that the people who discovered this didn't work with Sony to have this corrected before publishing the flaws. They could of prevented this whole mess if they had done so. And yeah I know Sony could of prevented this by hiring more competent engineers or doing better QA. But lets face it Sony is a hardware firm not a bank. They probably never envisioned getting the kind of attention from hackers that they did. If it was an easy problem corporations wouldn't keep screwing it up.

    10. Re:Take note by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      If the rumor is indeed true that a custom firmware has been used to get some people free stuff, take note how Sony has handled the situation

      Err, no. There was an intrusion into PSN, and personal information has been compromised. They didn't shut down the whole infrastructure because some jerks were getting freebies.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    11. Re:Take note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but developers that actually know what they're doing are expensive!

    12. Re:Take note by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Ha, yeah right. Disclosing to Sony that found a flaw in their system is likely to get you the exact same treatment as Geohot.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    13. Re:Take note by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      They probably never envisioned getting the kind of attention from hackers that they did

      Sony is a multi billion dollar enterprise with the personal and financial details of 60+ million users and you think they didn't envision themselves being a target? FFS if your right I hope they send every one of their company execs to jail for gross neglience.

    14. Re:Take note by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify the situation from Sony's point of view the OtherOS feature was removed because it allowed the user to run their own software on the PS3, including software to look for vulnerabilities elsewhere in the system. By removing OtherOS they hoped to prevent people doing further analysis of the system, but of course that was monumentally stupid because it can be avoided by simply not updating the console.

      The later hacks used vulnerabilities found by examining protected parts of the system from the OtherOS environment with Geohot's glitching technique.

      So now Sony has managed a triple fuck-up. They removed OtherOS which didn't protect the PS3 and if anything motivated people to hack it. They then tried to shut the barn door by fixing the vulnerabilities as they were released, but because they used a constant in their crypto code there was nothing they could do. Now PSN is hacked with unencrypted/hashed user data stolen.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Take note by Legal.Troll · · Score: 0

      If you bother to read the featured articles, you could see that the personal information and possibly credit card information of all Sony PSN users was stolen by hackers. Your comment was thus pretty idiotic. Score: 3 (Interesting), my ass.

      --
      "Outdated business models" is code for "I don't like paying for things, but want them anyway"
    16. Re:Take note by Tuan121 · · Score: 1

      What if banks operated this way? They find a ring of fraudsters using bank accounts to commit fraud, and the bank responds by freezing everyone's accounts for weeks? It would be totally unacceptable.

      Except it's not a bank, it's a video game service for gods sake.

  14. Sony "can't rule out" credit card data was taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Recent post on their blog (http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/04/26/update-on-playstation-network-and-qriocity/) explains the following:

    "... we believe that an unauthorized person has obtained the following information that you provided: name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID. It is also possible that your profile data, including purchase history and billing address (city, state, zip), and your PlayStation Network/Qriocity password security answers may have been obtained. If you have authorized a sub-account for your dependent, the same data with respect to your dependent may have been obtained. While there is no evidence at this time that credit card data was taken, we cannot rule out the possibility. If you have provided your credit card data through PlayStation Network or Qriocity, out of an abundance of caution we are advising you that your credit card number (excluding security code) and expiration date may have been obtained."

  15. Penny Arcade by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Penny Arcade by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Better link (sorry about that, reader from the world of tomorrow!)

  16. Don't think so.. by SuperDre · · Score: 0

    You must be really gullable to think the rebug-firmware and being able to 'buy' games from PSN with fake CC would be the reason.. Sony could have easily suspended sale through PSN, so it wouldn't be possible to buy new content, but you would still be able to use PSN with bought content...

  17. Attention from government? Please no. by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

    I can see Sony's response already "These data breaches were caused by unauthorized tampering of proprietary hardware by criminal hackers in violation of federal DMCA laws and has caused considerable and irreparable damage and losses to our networks as well as preventing our users from fully enjoying their console experience in a lawful manner."

    1. Re:Attention from government? Please no. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      and stealing my credit card information...

  18. Not exactly. by chemicaldave · · Score: 2

    aren't there other goddamned things they should be working on?

    As a member of the Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law, this is exactly what Richard Blumenthal should, and is doing.

    1. Re:Not exactly. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      "Jurisdiction: (1) Oversight of laws and policies governing the collection, protection, use and dissemination of commercial information by the private sector, including online behavioral advertising, privacy within social networking websites and other online privacy issues; (2) Enforcement and implementation of commercial information privacy laws and policies; (3) Use of technology by the private sector to protect privacy, enhance transparency and encourage innovation; (4) Privacy standards for the collection, retention, use and dissemination of personally identifiable commercial information; and (5) Privacy implications of new or emerging technologies."

      Where does that say - "ask a software/hardware vendor why their free service isn't up and running"?

    2. Re:Not exactly. by chemicaldave · · Score: 2

      Where does that say - "ask a software/hardware vendor why their free service isn't up and running"?

      It doesn't... and Blumenthal isn't asking that... because he doesn't give a flying fuck about the functionality of the PSN. He cares about the "(4) Privacy standards for the collection, retention, use and dissemination of personally identifiable commercial information" which is clearly stated in his letter.

      "I am concerned that PlayStation Network users’ personal and financial information may have been inappropriately accessed by a third party," Blumenthal wrote to Jack Tretton, president and CEO of Sony Computer Entertainment America. "Compounding this concern is the troubling lack of notification from Sony about the nature of the data breach."

      Please RTFA next time.

    3. Re:Not exactly. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Take your meds, go to bed. It's obviously too late for you to be awake if your brain is malfunctioning this badly.

      "Oversight of laws and policies governing the collection, protection, use and dissemination of commercial information by the private sector"

      Commercial Information including your name and credit card number, shipping/billing address, etc.

      I wonder how fucked Sony's going to be in the UK? This is quite obviously a violation of the UK Data Protection law..

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  19. PSN May Be Back by Wednesday, Expert Claims by pilich · · Score: 1

    "The main thing Sony will be doing now is taking the original server code and rebuilding it using new login keys for their admin side," he said. He also claimed that Sony "will probably take the chance to change the developers root key that was recently leaked, which tells PSN that a particular piece of software is licensed and allowed to use the PlayStation Network."

    http://www.gamepro.com/article/news/219040/psn-may-be-back-by-wednesday-expert-claims/

  20. Kotaku: "Sony Comes Clean" Data Stolen by eddy · · Score: 1
    Sony Comes Clean: PlayStation Network Hackers Have Stolen Personal Data

    Sony says while personal information was likely stolen they don't believe credit card numbers were and that they hope to have the Playstation Network service back up within a week.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Kotaku: "Sony Comes Clean" Data Stolen by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Not that I begrudge Kotaku the clicks, but if you are going to post it, post the one that comes from the horses mouth.

      Update on PlayStation Network and Qriocity

      + Posted by Patrick Seybold // Sr. Director, Corporate Communications & Social Media

      Thank you for your patience while we work to resolve the current outage of PlayStation Network & Qriocity services. We are currently working to send a similar message to the one below via email to all of our registered account holders regarding a compromise of personal information as a result of an illegal intrusion on our systems. These malicious actions have also had an impact on your ability to enjoy the services provided by PlayStation Network and Qriocity including online gaming and online access to music, movies, sports and TV shows. We have a clear path to have PlayStation Network and Qriocity systems back online, and expect to restore some services within a week.

      We’re working day and night to ensure it is done as quickly as possible. We appreciate your patience and feedback.

      Valued PlayStation Network/Qriocity Customer:
      We have discovered that between April 17 and April 19, 2011, certain PlayStation Network and Qriocity service user account information was compromised in connection with an illegal and unauthorized intrusion into our network. In response to this intrusion, we have:

      Temporarily turned off PlayStation Network and Qriocity services;
      Engaged an outside, recognized security firm to conduct a full and complete investigation into what happened; and
      Quickly taken steps to enhance security and strengthen our network infrastructure by re-building our system to provide you with greater protection of your personal information.

      We greatly appreciate your patience, understanding and goodwill as we do whatever it takes to resolve these issues as quickly and efficiently as practicable.

      Although we are still investigating the details of this incident, we believe that an unauthorized person has obtained the following information that you provided: name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID. It is also possible that your profile data, including purchase history and billing address (city, state, zip), and your PlayStation Network/Qriocity password security answers may have been obtained. If you have authorized a sub-account for your dependent, the same data with respect to your dependent may have been obtained. While there is no evidence at this time that credit card data was taken, we cannot rule out the possibility. If you have provided your credit card data through PlayStation Network or Qriocity, out of an abundance of caution we are advising you that your credit card number (excluding security code) and expiration date may have been obtained.

      For your security, we encourage you to be especially aware of email, telephone, and postal mail scams that ask for personal or sensitive information. Sony will not contact you in any way, including by email, asking for your credit card number, social security number or other personally identifiable information. If you are asked for this information, you can be confident Sony is not the entity asking. When the PlayStation Network and Qriocity services are fully restored, we strongly recommend that you log on and change your password. Additionally, if you use your PlayStation Network or Qriocity user name or password for other unrelated services or accounts, we strongly recommend that you change them, as well.

    2. Re:Kotaku: "Sony Comes Clean" Data Stolen by eddy · · Score: 1

      Welcome to slashdot, where people know how to follow links/how the internet works. If the story wasn't sourced to blog post you'd have a point.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
  21. To tell the truth... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2

    To tell the truth, I do not believe a think Sony says. Sony credibility has fallen to zero, or negative even. So if Sony says their system was brought to its knees by a "console hack" I naturally tend to assume that the real cause was an inside job. And then I go on to speculate about what kind of employee abuse goes on inside Sony that might trigger such a thing, not that I condone it.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    1. Re:To tell the truth... by scot4875 · · Score: 2

      Here's my guess: Sony trusted their client.

      They built the PS3, assumed that it would/could never be hacked, so then assumed that they could trust anything it sent them. They engineered their entire network around the fact that the client was trustworthy. They were lazy with security because they thought they had a secure path between themselves and the user.

      Then someone hacked the PS3. Oops. Now the cat's out of the bag, and if you leave the network available, God knows what will happen. So their only option is to bring the entire thing down before anyone gets a chance to see just how badly they fucked it up.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    2. Re:To tell the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - Sony has negative credibility - and All I can think is this is karma for for an organisation that sues some one who offers to help them improve security and who calls Linux users hackers and then announces android tablets.
            They so dont get the technology. Its Sad - once they were my company of choice but now - I boycott them and I encourage all to do the same !

    3. Re:To tell the truth... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Who the hell modded this up?

      Sony hasn't said that their system was brought down by a custom firmware hack. That's just blind speculation.

      My face hurts. it's a bad time to be a sony fanboy. First i was face palming hard at what sony did, now I'm face palming hard at what anti-Sony dicks are saying on the internet. Where's my advil?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    4. Re:To tell the truth... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Who the hell modded this up?

      Quite probably, someone who detests Sony. No shortage.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  22. And everyone was saying hacking their ps3 was ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People up in arms bitching at sony saying they should be able to custom hack their consoles with their own firmwares and all that other geohot was doing that every nerd was behind him 100%.

    Well, you see what happens when people do shit with their stuff that were not supposed to do? All it took was one jerk to mess it up for everyone worldwide. Yeah hacking your console is a real great idea and you morons supported it without thinking because you wanted to believe your hip suave tech people and want to be on the bandwagon against the big evil corporations like a you were hippies with droid phones or something.

  23. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only there had been some white-hat hacker to warn Sony that this might happen.

  24. Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Mysteray · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd written a blog post speculating about a worst-case scenario involving attackers using the leaked firmware signing keys to push a malicious firmware update from Sony's compromised backend servers. Personally, I've disconnected my PS3 from the network until the all-clear sounds from Sony.

    1. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd written a blog post speculating about a worst-case scenario involving attackers using the leaked firmware signing keys to push a malicious firmware update from Sony's compromised backend servers.

      Personally, I've disconnected my PS3 from the network until the all-clear sounds from Sony.

      Yeah, that's much worse... as long as you've got under $250 in your bank account and you consider any personal time dealing with banks to be worthless.

    2. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is far from the worse case. Consider that the attackers have your name, address, phone, password, birthday, answers to security questions, and who knows what else. That is a shit-ton of personal information that could be used to compromise your entire life. A broken/compromised Playstation is the least of your worries.

      That's exactly why I never use the same password on multiple sites, I never provide real answers to security questions, and I never use my real birthday.

    3. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Mysteray · · Score: 1

      your name, address, phone, password, birthday, answers to security questions, and who knows what else

      But all that stuff is more or less public these days. Except for 'password' and some security questions.

      At my job, I do worry about internet-facing systems. I think it's really hard to overstate the type of infrastructure damage that could be caused by a 50-million unit high-performance botnet.

    4. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've not written any blog post about how this can go all nukiliear on us all and make most IF NOT ALL of the goats die. But there will be bacon.

    5. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Mysteray · · Score: 1

      Oh well that's just great. Being a vegetarian, I won't benefit from the impending surfeit of goat bacon.

    6. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is fucking awesome.

    7. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Stray7Xi · · Score: 2

      A broken/compromised Playstation is the least of your worries.

      Lost personal information is a well understand problem, credit monitoring, blah blah blah. Nightmare scenario for sony is a million PS3's updated with a firmware that no longer accepts updates. That would require a mass recall which would be very slow. It'd be utter destruction of the PS3 brand.

    8. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Mysteray · · Score: 1

      Nightmare scenario for sony is a million PS3's updated with a firmware that no longer accepts updates.

      Except there are something like 50 million. Never mind the mass recall, imagine them all DDoSing some critical sector of the economy.

    9. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd written a blog post speculating about a worst-case scenario involving attackers using the leaked firmware signing keys to push a malicious firmware update from Sony's compromised backend servers.

      Personally, I've disconnected my PS3 from the network until the all-clear sounds from Sony.

      That's pretty trusting of you. Myself, I've permanently disconnected by PS3 from their network, and sold all my games already. When I get some time I'll go hack my system open and toss Linux on it, but its days as a gaming machine are now past.

    10. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I've disconnected my PS3 from the network until the all-clear sounds from Sony.

      what the use in that... the failure is the server security not the PS3 itself...

      and you are going to need to connect it to get the update which patches the problem. i bet sony wishes it left the linux ability on its consols now...

    11. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Update millions of users to an open kernel that runs homebrew and/or pirated games. Remove BluRay region locks. Disable further updates. Turn the system Sony used to take away OtherOS on them. For once that really would be epic.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Forget CC#s, there is a worse scenario by Mysteray · · Score: 1

      It's to prevent the server compromise from spreading to my unit. Details are in the blog post I linked.

  25. Re:And everyone was saying hacking their ps3 was o by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or we are seeing what happens when a company become so arrogant that they don't bother actually locking down this info despite the fact that it would be inevitable that someone would come along and find a backdoor.

    Seriously, a 'hacked PS3' being able to do this is pretty much the definition of "Security Design Failure".

  26. Next Gen Console Power by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2

    Bought the two big titles that came out a week ago. Can't play Mortal Kombat on my PS3 because PSN is down. Can't play Portal 2 on my Xbox360 because it red ringed on me. Isn't the latest technology grand?

    1. Re:Next Gen Console Power by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Go and get some fresh air instead, you will feel better for it. (hopes Portal 2 coming tomorrow doesn't need PSN)

    2. Re:Next Gen Console Power by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      What's that yellow face in the sky? IT BURNS US!!!

    3. Re:Next Gen Console Power by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Bought the two big titles that came out a week ago. Can't play Mortal Kombat on my PS3 because PSN is down. Can't play Portal 2 on my Xbox360 because it red ringed on me. Isn't the latest technology grand?

      Oh Hai,

      I didn't notice all your problems before because I was too busy having fun on my gaming PC.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Next Gen Console Power by chemosh6969 · · Score: 1

      At least with a working 360, you can play all your games and content, online or offline. What retard would've designed a console where you wouldn't be able to play a single player game offline? I guess that retard's name is Sony.

  27. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by interkin3tic · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Spend hundreds of dollars at least to get a gaming PC, ignore the sunken cost of their PS3s, all to play portal 2 a few days sooner?

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: PC fanboys really are the worst.

    Disclaimer: I am a PC gamer, and do not have a PS3.

  28. Oh oh personal data comprised by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    Sony announced today basically all personal info has been comprised by the hacker(s): http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/04/26/update-on-playstation-network-and-qriocity/

  29. Re:And everyone was saying hacking their ps3 was o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me get this straight (if this is even true), Sony implemented a moronic system (hint: never trust the client) and you blame people messing with their PS3 to do what they want as the people at fault? The Dev console should have never been able to unlock retail titles like this, this is Sony's fault and their solution to fix it is their decision. They've already proven they are abysmal at security so if the user data was indeed stolen I'll bet you a nickel the important parts are not properly encrypted or hashed.

  30. Cultural effect? by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lets look at two problems with a Japanese company. PSN down and TEPCO's reactor. Both had similar reactions.

    Silence, followed by small admissions, followed by admissions its much worse that it appears, followed by more silence, followed by admissions that some members of the public may have been harmed, repeat. No timetables, no estimates.

    Is this possibly a Japanese cultural thing?

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Cultural effect? by Prien715 · · Score: 2

      Maybe. One was caused by the worst earthquake in Japanese recorded history* the other was caused by bad security practices.

      The other cultural difference (we'll see how Americanized they became) is that the people responsible may take responsibility and leave in disgrace. If this were America and your name was BP, you'd get a fat bonus check...for you know, performance.

      * Technically, the reactor survived the earthquake but was damaged beyond repair by the tsunami. But the earthquake caused the tsunami ergo the earthquake caused the reactor to fail. (Logic fails if it were possible to prevent tsunamis following earthquakes, but I have it on good authority we can't do that yet;))

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    2. Re:Cultural effect? by manaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets look at every problem with any company. (E.g. BP Oil spill, Three Mile Island, TEPCO's reactor, Sony's rootkit, Exxon Valdez, Apple's antenna, Microsoft's uhhh everything, various company's spinach, peanuts, milk, salmonella in meat, etc.) They all have similar reactions.

      Silence, followed by small admissions, followed by admissions it's much worse that it appears, followed by more silence, followed by admissions that some members of the public may have been harmed, repeat. No timetables, no estimates.

      Is this possibly a corporate thing?

      Answer: yes

    3. Re:Cultural effect? by foetusinc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes - the Japanese as a rule will not speculate on worst case scenarios the way westerners do. They will say what they know has happened or is wrong, not what could be wrong or might have happened. This is often perplexing to both sides, so that they'll think we're being hyperactive or paranoid, and we'll assume they're being obfuscatory or secretive.

    4. Re:Cultural effect? by doctor_no · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, but this is plain racist.

      We've had industrial accidents in West as well, as systems that have been hacked into. BP is the most recent example, and Union Carbine's Bhopal disaster is another (which killed 3,700 people and inured close to half a million). Cover ups, slow-response, not very unique to one country or company.

      None of it is "cultural thing". In fact, Sony isn't very Japanese these days, its run by a British-born American, and Western executives pull a lot of sway, especially in the music division, movie studios and Playstation division where a lot of its is centered in the US. Their phone division is split with Ericsson, their music division with Germany's BMG.

    5. Re:Cultural effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe. One was caused by the worst earthquake in Japanese recorded history*"

      You're mixing up the significance of the word "recorded" in the statements about the March 11th earthquake. It's the worst earthquake recorded by modern seismographs in Japanese history, with modern seismographic instruments dating back a little over 100 years. It is almost certainly not the worst earthquake or tsunami in recorded Japanese history, which is much longer than that.

      And while it isn't possible to prevent tsunami following earthquakes, it was entirely possible to prevent some of the crucial damage, such as by installing backup systems on the 40m-high plateau beside the Fukushima plant, well outside the range of any historical tsunami in the region. That wasn't done, kind of like the way Sony failed to use a random seed for one of the encryption keys they were using -- easier to implement, but not safe from known vulnerabilities.

    6. Re:Cultural effect? by staghorne · · Score: 1

      Silence, followed by small admissions, followed by admissions it's much worse that it appears, followed by more silence, followed by admissions that some members of the public may have been harmed, repeat.

      Not to deny your point about reprehensible corporate self-preservation strategies, but in all fairness this also sounds exactly like the USSR disclosure history for the Chernobyl disaster.

      Is this possibly a thing humans do, as individuals and in various organized groups?

      Answer: yes

      --
      Paddle faster, I hear banjos
    7. Re:Cultural effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * followed by more silence *

      to elaborate, a company is seen as a person as much as any japanese citizen
      when something big happens representatives are to apologise in it's behalf
      it involves a deep prolonged kow-tow which stems back to "offering one's head"
      it's also due to this that you won't hear anything immediately from a company
      a person in japan doesn't splutter out an apology immediately when it's serious
      therefore leaving time before a statement is indicative of a situations seriousness
      correcting statements because it was rushed is seen as improper / impolite
      moreover, it's a trademark of young and brash kids so is given little respect
      (sort of like "why waste my time". get it right first then tell me the details)
      time is also 'given' (by the public) as it's understood they don't want to 'lose face'

      so overall it's not like western culture where pr's may jump about trying to explain things away before the real details are found out. case in point would be an apple support representative stating that apple 'must track your location' to provide a good service, then later someone else in the company saying 'we do not track your location', then someone else from apple finding there's a patent about the pipeline about your system which keep a database of tracking data

    8. Re:Cultural effect? by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Technically, the reactor survived the earthquake but was damaged beyond repair by the tsunami.

      That's what has been alleged, but I have not seen conclusive evidence for this version of events. It is true that the cooling system ultimately failed because the tsunami washed away the emergency diesel generators. However, we've also learned of a 20 cm long crack in one of the containment vessels (in reactor 2, IIRC) as the suspected source of much of the released radioactivity and so far nobody has said that this damage was caused by the tsunami and not the earthquake. (Another possible culprit is the hydrogen explosion.)

      In short, it is my belief that we do not yet have a detailed account of what incident caused what damage. And as long as we don't, saying that the reactor survived the earthquake is disingenuous and nothing but the propaganda of nuclear energy apologists.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    9. Re:Cultural effect? by vlm · · Score: 1

      None of it is "cultural thing".

      Huh? You presented a pretty good argument that it is not only part of their culture, but pretty much part of everyone's culture. Although maybe a bit more intense in theirs. If it were not part of their culture, they would not be doing it...

      Sorry, but this is plain racist.

      Huh? Japan, the country, is basically 100% one race unlike some countries, leading to some confusion. But I was not discussing the behavior of my coworker of 100% Japanese descent, multi-gen American... Now if I accused her and the country of Japan of behaving that way, then you wouldn't look foolish...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    10. Re:Cultural effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the racist to presume this is racist. Culture is not race. Take your PC shit and shove it.

    11. Re:Cultural effect? by manaway · · Score: 1

      Chernobyl is another excellent example, along with Union Carbide's leak and many other corporate disasters.

      Is this possibly a thing humans do, as individuals and in various organized groups?

      Sure, this does (roughly) generalize to the psychology individuals, families, and groups; as well as corporations. We're all familiar with dirty family secrets and the elephant in the room which no one talks about. The big difference being, of course, the scale of effects when dealing with environmental or economic damage--which, unlike families (unless they're Koch brothers-sized), large or multinational corporations profit from while the public pays the risks of.

  31. SQL injection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some ones user name was probably "users'); DROP TABLE allusers;"
    http://nothing.golddave.com/?p=123

  32. If Woody had gone straight to the police... by tekrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Sony had never removed "other OS" feature, they would never have encountered the focused rage of the entire enthusiast community.

    Now, it's possible that the Playstation Network, and possibly the entire PS3 platform, is finished.

    You reap what you sow, Sony....

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other way to look at this is, they probably had a valid reason to remove the OtherOS feature... this was it.

    2. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing the feature DID disrupt service for millions of people...

    3. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on now, don't be dramatic. The number of PSN users totally dwarfs the number of other OS users by a huge margin.

    4. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This makes no sense. So, because Sony decided to remove a part of their product that very few people use, it's their fault. If Microsoft removed cross-game chat for Live, do they deserve to be hacked? I say Hell No! Sony could remove DVD playback ability via a firmware update one day. While unlikely, it would NEVER give you the right to commit a crime and hack their servers. Just because you don't like something, does not give you the right to commit a felony. Do what normal Americans and people do, protest peacefully.

    5. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that the enthusiast community are a bunch of entitled dicks?

      Do what we say or we'll hose your entire business workflow? Isn't that bullying?

      Besides, where has it been shown and proven that the PSN break-in was conducted on a compromised console?

      The CFW thing was about getting freebies, not users personal details.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    6. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that the enthusiast community are a bunch of entitled dicks?

      No, you're thinking of Sony, who believe they're entitled to disable your system after they sold it to you.

      Do what we say or we'll hose your entire business workflow? Isn't that bullying?

      Well, yeah, it would be, if anyone had actually said that instead of you just stuffing words into their mouths.

      Assuming the console hack theory pans out, what happened was a side-effect of Sony being a dick, not a direct response. While OtherOS was available, people were happy using it. Once it was disabled, they had to go outside of the box in order to find a way to get their system working again. Which revealed a backdoor that other, less scrupulous users were able to use.

      Besides, where has it been shown and proven that the PSN break-in was conducted on a compromised console?

      Nowhere. Hence the claimed in the title of this story.

      The CFW thing was about getting freebies, not users personal details.

      Actually, the CFW was about reclaiming your own system, and the features it had when you bought it. The fact that it circumvented copy protection mechanisms is likewise a side-effect, and another one that Sony could have avoided by not being a dick. Now, most people who download it might use it for copy protection circumvention (and more power to them - they're probably the only ones who can play downloaded content now that the PSN's down) but the people who wrote it only did so after OtherOS was removed, and their stated intention was to restore that functionality.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    7. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Actually, the CFW was about reclaiming your own system, and the features it had when you bought it.

      Other than OtherOS what features does CFW give me that I didn't have before? I never had the ability to play homebrew.

      What I was talking about was the CFW dev mode outlined in the context of the article. I doubt the CFW dev mode allowed for the massive leak of customer data.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    8. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% agree with this. the removal of OtherOS actually motivated and activated people that would otherwise
      have been content and quiet. they stuck a huge stick into a hornets nest and then wonder why they
      have been stung. OtherOS removal does appear in the timelines to be THE catalyst for attacks
      against Sony PS3 firmware and unlocking techniques improving. its been a running battle since
      then that Sony have lost every round of. even worse, your typical consumer...who actually represents
      > 90% of the market and BUYS games has had to suffer week after week of new firmware upgrades
      ALL of which remove features from their console

    9. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      If Sony had never removed "other OS" feature, they would never have encountered the focused rage of the entire enthusiast community.

      That rage and/or animosity may very well exist, but this isn't dependent on that. Petty revenge is not a fair light to cast on the PSN community, they are the victims.

      People don't rob banks because the bank made them angry. They rob banks because they want money (or attention, but that requires getting caught). Though that anger may be used to justify the act since no one really wants to be "the bad guy". This was for the value of the information that was attained.

      This may and probably would have happened eventually. The exploit was probably something no one realized or if they did they failed to communicate the issue.

      Regardless, whether Sony could help this or not, this is a catastrophic situation and they've already lost a lot of credibility with their otherwise unscrupulous history. This is at a time when they're really experimenting and just released some things people have waited a long time for. There's a small chance of this destroying them and a large chance of teaching them a hard lesson.

      Think of other corporations recently that had to radically change and apply a face to their obelisk-like aloofness. Microsoft, Dell (sort of, and not that DUDE YOU'RE GETTING A DELL shit), BP... it might be incredibly fake but corporations are generally seen as suspicious with so many names around. A little bit of anthropomorphism is necessary.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    10. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Sony could remove DVD playback ability via a firmware update one day. While unlikely, it would NEVER give you the right to commit a crime and hack their servers. Just because you don't like something, does not give you the right to commit a felony. Do what normal Americans and people do, protest peacefully.

      This is a really messy situation... Sony pisses off some people, then customers suffer. However, there's no evidence that this is directly related to pissing people off...

      Black-hats act to disrupt or to take something.
      White-hats act on vigilantism, learning and for the good of the public.
      Sony made decisions that hurt customers.
      To enact revenge on behalf of the customers, Sony would have to be the target.
      Something was done to disrupt PSN service. This hurts customers and not as much Sony.
      Something different may have been done or the disruption was related to gaining valuable information. This hurts the customers.
      None of this serves the public good. None of this helped to improve the way Sony treats its customers.
      This was motivated by greed, not justice. With such power someone apparently had, they could have sent a warning, maybe even shut down the system to keep someone else from exploiting it.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    11. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      >

      Besides, where has it been shown and proven that the PSN break-in was conducted on a compromised console?

      There's nothing indicating that this was even motivated by revenge...

      4Chan attacked PSN. Someone realized they were dicks and said cut that shit out. Most probably did.
      This probably inspired someone to take advantage of the noise, a person or people already intent on gaining 70 million people's extremely valuable information. This is an accomplishment that could potentially be in the billions.
      Blaming this on gamers, "anonymous" and homebrewers is really convenient but a little bit of thought shows this is ridiculous.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    12. Re:If Woody had gone straight to the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Hacking and stealing people's personal data is totally justified if the company you're stealing it from did something to annoy you!

  33. DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is another example of the evil's of DRM. A friend of mine bought Bionic Commando Rearmed 2, an offline game that requires online verification every time you start it, from the playstation network awhile ago. Well guess what, that offline game hasn't worked for a week now.

    Gotta love the online verification.

  34. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Portal 2 doesn't require hundreds of dollar to run.

    Disclaimer. I am a PC and PS3 gamer.

  35. Does anybody *buy* this story? by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Translation :
    newbie outsourced tech typed "sudo rm -rf *.*" and we don't have a backup.

    If Sony ran a supermarket: if one guy was caught shoplifting, they'd close down the supermarket and deny an entire neighborhood any food.

    This is their rootkit fiasco all over again. Deny, deny, deny, blame it on "hackers", don't admit that THEY fucked up.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Does anybody *buy* this story? by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

      Buy what story? They announced today that an outside intrusion has resulted in all user data being stolen.

  36. Re:Fuck the rebug assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I did it. It was me. I did it specifically to piss you off, and it worked. I am very happy; thank you.

  37. Good time to ask for a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay raise.. If I was a DEV (good job I'm not) I've go right in and give it to'em, give me X or I call in sick lol.

    Money money money!

    1. Re:Good time to ask for a... by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I have a feeling a lot of current employees could be on really thin ice over this one. Heads could be rolling at any time. I don't think I'd want to distinguish myself by being the guy who essentially tried to extort a pay raise out of them.

  38. wow by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    So the PSN is cracked... good and hard.
    Will Sony face any penalties what-so-ever for this? No.
    How many millions if not billions of dollars has their lax security cost their customers?

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just their customers. I canceled my credit card as soon as I heard the news (and I'd have done it a week earlier if they'd told us a week earlier). I know some people would think this is an over-reaction on my part, for the sake of a few days inconvenience while I wait for the new card to come through I know I won't potentially have weeks of trying to dispute any fraudulent debits that may be headed my way.

      If only a small percentage of the people affected by the theft of their personal data decide to do the same thing, the credit card companies would not be at all happy about the cost of this either. Don't they require certain safeguards with regards to data retention practices when they allow online services to debit from their accounts?

  39. Problem with connected systems by mitler · · Score: 2

    It seems we're going more and more toward this centrally connected system for gaming and software in general. Used to be if you wanted to use software you bought for a computer or game system, as long as you weren't in multiplayer or otherwise using network resources you were able to play without worrying about connection problems. Now when something like this happens a lot of things that have no apparent NEED for a connection stop working completely. It just shows that while being connected is nice, it certainly has drawbacks when some games or services are unusable. I can't watch Netflix now because it requires a PSN connection - even though the Netflix service is working perfectly fine. This reminds me a lot of Steam - another platform that is very convenient when it works, but extremely frustrating when it doesn't. These vendors need to come up with a better way to handle authentication in a way that doesn't leave you high and dry for something that would otherwise work if it wasn't for their failed network. Maybe some kind of token that only needs occasionally updated. Sometimes I miss those days when you just clicked the icon and it ran no questions asked!

    1. Re:Problem with connected systems by westyvw · · Score: 1

      You can still watch netflix. Just keep bouncing around the menus, and the Sony annoyance will go away and into netflix you go.

    2. Re:Problem with connected systems by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it appears that the Netflix client was fixed somehow. Now, if you just ignore it a couple times, you can watch a movie...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  40. All Fun and Games... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    I'm all for a little lighthearted security breaching from time to time, but steal my credit card info and I hope you go to jail.

    1. Re:All Fun and Games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on there. You gave Sony your info, it's not like Sony held a gun to your head and demanded your info. Sony is a bitch and should go to jail for having shitty security of valuable information, not for "stealing" your info. Also Bel-Air.

    2. Re:All Fun and Games... by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      Really? I mean, yeah, be pissed at Sony. They screwed up big time. I agree there, but you *disagree* that the hacker should go to jail?

    3. Re:All Fun and Games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for borrowing the data. If "they" use it in someway (including selling), then they should be punished for that. Merely acquiring information shouldn't be illegal.

  41. Summer Wars by tekrat · · Score: 2

    The anime film "Summer Wars" predicted this EXACT scenario, except a little more extreme and with more dire consequences, but pretty darn close.

    http://www.anime.com/Summer_Wars/

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Summer Wars by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Wait. So the US government released a computer AI that took down PSN because it wanted to play games and steal peoples accounts? I assume the less extreme part was that it didn't try to drop a satellite on nuclear reactor. All kidding aside Summer Wars is a great flick.

  42. I am not a security expert by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I'm definitely not an expert in computer security. I do know a thing or two about programming and good practices though. The first amazement in this is that they had ALL of the account information available in a single place. I've never designed a system like PSN but right off the bat, I would ensure that the financial data and the account data are on completely separate systems. That way, if one gets hacked, the other has a chance of not getting compromised. The account details would be managed in much the same way as password data -- as hashes. And of course the two or more systems would be able to know who they are talking about by some user identity hash. It just makes simple and logical sense. Any information that is considered sensitive should be treated as such.

    That's not to say that they didn't do this and that the compromise wasn't extremely sophisticated, but it certainly sounds like they did one thing wrong -- they stored credit card information in the clear and that user details were also stored that way.

    Well, glad I'm not a Sony user.

    1. Re:I am not a security expert by tao · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They almost certainly had that info on separate systems. Why else the "Billing address, password questions, and credit card info may also have been taken." disclaimer. If the information had been on the same system they would have been sure. However rather than assume that the information is safe just because it was on a separate server, they're saying that "at the moment we don't know. Please be vigilant until we can give a definite answer".

    2. Re:I am not a security expert by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      not to mention, who keeps the security question AND answer stored in clear in their database instead of at least one-way hashing the answer?

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    3. Re:I am not a security expert by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Everyone.

    4. Re:I am not a security expert by surgen · · Score: 1

      They almost certainly had that info on separate systems. Why else the "Billing address, password questions, and credit card info may also have been taken." disclaimer. If the information had been on the same system they would have been sure..

      Not necessarily. If the exploiters were just using the exploit to download as many games as they wanted, they may have overlooked or not cared about the billing data sitting on the same system. Sony doesn't know for sure that they accessed it, just that they could have. The "may" means the attacker could have accessed it, they just don't know for sure.

    5. Re:I am not a security expert by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      > I'm definitely not an expert in computer security.

      You could get a job at Sony!

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:I am not a security expert by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      This should be +5 funny. Wish I had mod points. Rare genuine laugh out loud post! :)

    7. Re:I am not a security expert by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I can say that without evidence (available to outside sources), the Japanese don't speculate about what "might" have happened. So without question, it was "exposed." And in my opinion, it has most likely happened. This is not unlike the Fukushima problem -- they never tell how bad things are unless they are required to do so and even then, they tend to understate the situation. You are likely reading this through a western thought interpreter. Working directly and closely with Japanese people for more than two years has taught me a LOT about they way they think as a people which is most certainly not like people in the west.

      Hell, look at how long they took to announce that they were hacked at all! "We are down because of an external intrusion." What the hell does that mean? Could be anything from a DDoS to someone dressed as a janitor grabbing things from their data center. And I would not be a bit surprised to find that they waited until the very last second before they were in violation of some legal reporting requirement before they finally disclosed even this much.

      If that data was exposed at all, odds are good that it wasn't encoded properly and/or that the data was all stored in one place. I suspect this will be PSN's "Fukushima incident" the way this is playing out.

  43. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by MooseMuffin · · Score: 1

    I already have a gaming PC. And an xbox/ps3/wii...

  44. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by gknoy · · Score: 1

    To be fair, I hear Portal 2 is really good. ;)

  45. Evils of DRM by tekrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, can't you wait until your Blu-Ray player stops working too, every time you want to watch a movie? This is why you can't have "server" verification. Because there's no guarantee the server will be there.

    Tell your friend to return the game. It's broken. Get his money back. It's designed to fail.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Evils of DRM by Carlos+Rodriguez · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, he can't return the game because Bionic Commando 2 is a downloadable game from PSN.

      And people wonder why the most important question that guides any of my game purchases is "what DRM does it use?"

    2. Re:Evils of DRM by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Steam has gone down multiple times for my dad. He was very upset every time it happened.

      Result? It comes back, and my dad continues buying lots games from it, no matter how much I tell him why I refuse to use it and other online stores.

      Incidentally, back in Sony land, half the content in Gran Turismo 5 is now no longer accessible, and that game ships on a disc. The seasonal races are offline-only and they are no longer accessible. The "online dealership" offers the same cars that are in the regular showroom, but it is also inaccessible. Furthermore, all those "unlockable" museum cards, which are stored on the game disc, are no longer accessible. It bothers me that I have to connect to the PSN to unlock content in the first place, but even after unlocking the content already on the game disc, I still lose access to all of it if the network goes down. Even unlockable offline content disappears!

      I don't buy games from the Store because I can't demo most of them, I can't own any of them. I guess I won't buy any more games on actual physical media, either.

  46. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just as valid as the other suggestions that I have seen console fanbois make to PC gaming over the years when the media was pushing the idea that PC gaming was somehow dying when PC gaming is really all that is left. Consoles died in 1996; "consoles" of today are lowend PCs.

  47. Hmmm... by thehodapp · · Score: 1

    Two things.

    a. I thought slashdot didn't edit articles. I'm obviously wrong.
    b. This smells of anonymous....

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 2

      Two things.

      a. I thought slashdot didn't edit articles. I'm obviously wrong.

      b. This smells of anonymous....

      That guy always was a coward...

  48. I've had enough.. by Mia'cova · · Score: 1

    I signed up recently to get the NHL GameCenter app. Basically it would let me stream games. My laptop didn't quite handle the high quality stream smoothly. I was hooking that to the TV previously. Since ps3/nhl had an exclusive agreement, this was the only way to go. Well, a week after buying the app, a new console firmware is released. That breaks the app. So it was a good month before that started working again. Now, ignoring the fact that the quality was actually worse than with my laptop, that really sucked. Now the network is down so, again, it doesn't work. And bonus, my information is compromised. I'm starting to get a little annoyed!

    1. Re:I've had enough.. by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      After all this, you're still just "starting to get a little annoyed." Even if you hadn't mentioned the NHL, I would've guessed you were Canadian ;-)

  49. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Portal 2 doesn't require hundreds of dollar to run.

    That depends entirely on what hardware you have already. Plenty of people have laptops that are more than 5 years old, and that work fine for anything besides gaming. Out of my gamer friends, only one has a computer capable of running portal 2.

  50. I'm sorry to those affected...BUT by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 0

    ahhha hhahhhahha woooo hahhhahah. heee heee haaw sniffle, hahahhahhha wahh hhe ahhh ahhhahhhahhah I could not of happened to a more deserving company. Karma is a bitch.

  51. Instant Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could not happen to a nicer organization /sarc

  52. So... shoe, meet foot. by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    So basically the shoe is now on the other foot and someone/people have now done to Sony what Sony has been doing to the public for years now. Namely, stealing their information, compromising their computer systems and causing general havoc within the household due to poorly or maliciously designed objects.

    Boy, guess what I don't feel for Sony?

  53. lemme guess... by sxpert · · Score: 1

    removing "other os" was *NOT* a good idea ? ;-)

  54. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    You and I have different impressions of console fanboys then. I see console fanboys as generally being unconcerned with PC gamers. Consolers mainly seem to justify sony/ms/nintendo's every action and attack the "other" consoles. Furthermore, PC gamers are more vocal. I can't remember the last time I saw a PS3 or XBOX fan predicting the demise of PC gaming. PC fanboys conversely take every opportunity to preach their religion. Gaming article on slashdot? Two things are assured: 1. PC fanboy telling everyone they should throw away their consoles 2. Discussion of DRM.

    Lastly, there's something much more arrogant about suggesting that -everyone- should do things exactly as they do (which is what PC fanboys like Dan667 are doing) than there is about making false predictions about the PC gaming industry (console fanboys).

  55. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by lennier · · Score: 1

    Spend hundreds of dollars at least to get a gaming PC

    Aww! How cute! You guys in the USA complain about spending hundreds of dollars.

    Cheap PCs generally cost upwards of $1000 here (NZ). A little cheaper now that netbooks have come out, but last year I saw a full gaming rig going for around $7000. Yeah, I thought it was stupidly expensive too.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  56. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Seumas · · Score: 1

    It's the same in the States. You're not getting a gaming rig for "hundreds of dollars" here. A new videocard (unless you go commodity) is going to run you $300 to $750. A good estimate on a high-end (but not highest) gaming system without peripherals is around $1,500. If you're buying one that is pre-built, then it might be more. I have no idea.

  57. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    "A new videocard (unless you go commodity) is going to run you $300 to $750. A good estimate on a high-end (but not highest) gaming system without peripherals is around $1,500"

    You're doing it wrong.

  58. cleartext passwords? by Harald+Paulsen · · Score: 2

    Does this mean PSN stored passwords in cleartext?

    If the password was hashed I'm not that concerned. You won't find my password in a rainbow-table.

    But if it was unhashed, a looooot of people should change their passwords.

    This XKCD comes to mind

    --
    Harald
    1. Re:cleartext passwords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people use the same password for PSN as they do for other things? Quite honestly I find the potential exposure of my password (and password security question answers) to be worse than the loss of a credit card number. I review credit card charges and can easily get another card. I don't even recall all the services I've used that password for (yes, I know it's bad, but a lot of us do it with a zillion online accounts these days). That Sony would store the original password and security question answers in a recoverable form takes them down yet another notch still, and I didn't think that would be possible.

    2. Re:cleartext passwords? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      You should change your password regardless.

    3. Re:cleartext passwords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS

    4. Re:cleartext passwords? by piers_downunder · · Score: 1

      Great, I'll rush to do it. All I need to do is login to the PSN to change my password and then... oh wait.

    5. Re:cleartext passwords? by Sene · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. If the passwords were not hashed that is pretty pathetic excuse for security from Sony. But then again we can only expect stuff like that from them.

    6. Re:cleartext passwords? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This being Sony, they probably "hashed" your passwords using a constant key [likely ROT-13] - which means that thanks to the millions of people using "monkey", or "password" as password the key is out and your password as well.
      I would be very concerned... if I had a PSN account.

    7. Re:cleartext passwords? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Heh. I won't even use the same web browser to access secure sites, let alone the same password.

    8. Re:cleartext passwords? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      You won't find almost anyone's password in a rainbow table. That's not how rainbow tables work. They work by being the simplest way to generate the same hash as the actual password. So, the answer is also that it doesn't matter how complicated your password is, it will be cracked by the rainbow table even though what they crack it with isn't your password.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  59. Moving on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My really old PS3 died with a hardware failure a couple days before PSN tanked. Instead of repair/replace I think my PS3 and PSP stuff is going to ebay and it is time for me to become a first time Xbox owner.

  60. Re:And everyone was saying hacking their ps3 was o by surgen · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the attitude I was afraid of. If sony was even mildly competent at security, nothing that could be done client-side from a console could be used to escalate privileges as radically as these people have.

    Just because I can write software for my computer doesn't mean that I can exploit steam as thoroughly as PSN has been. The guys at sony don't have a lick of sense when it comes to network security. This is not geohot's fault.

  61. I was gonna comment but my account was compromised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted to write something insightful but I used the same email and password on both PSN and slashdot so my account was compromised :-(

  62. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by praxis · · Score: 1

    You can build a good gaming system for under $1000 easy. Enough to run the latest games at decent (not best) settings. I spent $650 on my recent quad core 8GB ram machine (a few weeks old) but that was sans video cards. A GTX 460 is $200 so that brings it to $850 (without monitor).

  63. Karma - In It's Full Measure by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    I am likely a victim of the PS3 debacle, like so many others. So this does suck for us.

    But through it all, I am smiling. Why you may ask? This, to me, is Karma coming full circle for Sony and their fucking rootkits from half a decade ago.

    Remember those kids?

    --
    Huh?
  64. Worse by DrYak · · Score: 1

    A compromised PS3 with a malicious firmware can go undetected much longer, and keep sniffing your new CC# even after you change your card following the initial data breach.
    Stolen CC# = a short window of opportunity time, until the number get reported. (Same as a stolen physical CC)
    Compromised PS3 (a machine which is used to buy stuff online) = can be abused for much longer. (Same as a infected and root-kit-ed PC)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  65. Re:And everyone was saying hacking their ps3 was o by brkello · · Score: 1

    No one is that arrogant. Clearly incompetence.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  66. So if I bought it today I couldn't play at all? by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Because if so I should have gotten it from pirate bay.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
    1. Re:So if I bought it today I couldn't play at all? by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      TPB won't lose all your data either, as they don't have any of it.

  67. exclusives by halofan_sd · · Score: 0

    PS3 exclusives: Uncharted 3, Resistence 3, LBP 2, Killzone 3, SOCOM 4
    Xbox 360 exclusives: "not having your credit card info stolen"

    1. Re:exclusives by Bahamut_Omega · · Score: 1

      Think Sony has finally shot itself in the face? Used to be they innovated in the electronics department, now they just innovate in cooking the corporate books.

  68. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and put up with lame copy protection schemes that install weird shit on your computer? No thanks.

  69. I thinking of a gaming term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yes. FAIL

  70. With apologies to Benjamin Franklin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who would sacrifice OtherOS for PSN deserve neither.

    And now, they truly have neither. Thank you Sony for continually showing the world what a crock DRM is.

  71. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You're ignorant. Portal 2 can run on absolute shit hardware (minimum GPU is a 7600. The PS3 has a modified 7800. Most computers built within the past 5 years can run it and you can get one of those off Craigsist for LESS than the cost of the PS3.

    And you're only level five elitist. Come back when you only use operating systems written in raw ASM, n00b.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  72. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "A new videocard (unless you go commodity) is going to run you $300 to $750."

    Whet ripoff shit shop do you buy your shit from?

    http://www.pricewatch.com/video_cards/

    $160 460GTX.

    The 450GTS is only $110 and is barely under the 460 in performance. Still runs everything pretty much smoothly at maximum detail.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  73. Wells Fargo is aware of it by dave562 · · Score: 1

    I bank with Wells Fargo and after hearing of the data breach, I called to cancel my card. As soon as I mentioned Sony and Playstation, the rep told me that they have been receiving calls all day from Playstation users who are taking similar, proactive measures. In my case, I have a separate card that I use for online transactions, so my exposure was limited, but it is still a PITA to have to go through.

    This episode just goes to show how far we are from having a truly secure, digital economy. If a company with the resources that Sony has cannot even store payment information safely, it really dampens the public's enthusiasm for a completely digital payment system.

    My question is, why wasn't the information encrypted? Why weren't there access controls in place to prevent people from getting at that data? Why were the two systems linked in such a way that they could be compromised? All of these problems have been solved. Was the system even audited by an outside party?

    My company works with Fortune 50 companies and the US government on a regular basis. Our clients expect that we have been subjected to audits by neutral third parties (and we have). We do not even store credit card information like Sony does. How did were they not aware of the risks inherent in their architecture?

    If people can sue Apple over the location tracking issue, what is Sony's liability like on an issue like this one?

    1. Re:Wells Fargo is aware of it by am+2k · · Score: 1

      If a company with the resources that Sony has cannot even store payment information safely, it really dampens the public's enthusiasm for a completely digital payment system.

      Having the resources doesn't mean that Sony used them to that effect, rather than, say, implementing new DRM schemes.

      My question is, why wasn't the information encrypted?

      At some point, they need the unencrypted cc data, so it can't be a hash. They'd have to store the decryption key somewhere in their network, which was compromised by this attack. So encrypting wouldn't have helped at all.

      How did were they not aware of the risks inherent in their architecture?

      I'm pretty sure someone there was aware of it, and was either ignored or didn't think it very likely that somebody managed to break into the system.

    2. Re:Wells Fargo is aware of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If a company with the resources that Sony has cannot even store payment information safely"

      Sony dont care about people's info only the money they make out of people. Companies only do as little as they need to to make it work after that they calculate losses due to a problem and if its more they is good for the their share prices they will fix it if not they wit till it goes wrong blame everyone else and they fix it.
      http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic34904.html

  74. I like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They pissed off some people with a lot a free time. It is too close to the settlement to be a coincidence. It is nice to think that for all the intimidation that their lawyers and endless millions can produce, someone is willing to turn around and say "Oh, yeah?"

    But I find that scenario much less likely than this being something they cooked up themselves, to blame on the "pirates" and save some face.

  75. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They, nor you count as a gamer then, portal 2's requirements are not that steep.

    In fact you need to turn in your geek card asap.

  76. Godwin's law by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Mod up, AC has a point. Pretty much every Sony/PS3/PSN-related article that's been posted, both here and elsewhere, since the start of the Geohot debacle has been rife with the same generic "Geohot is a total douchebag. I don't need to know any details, just look at him!" or "Hackers should all be thrown in jail for life" or "You agreed to the ToS! Nobody can do anything against Sony now!" comments. I know GamesRadar was particularly bad about it but I'm sure there were others too. It's pretty clear that Sony has at least some "reputation preservation agents" working on this matter to try to steer public opinion toward their favour.

    There should be a Godwin's law for people who believe the opposing viewpoints are shills for corporations. This is a discussion board. Your going to find people who don't agree with you. If you didn't then that would be a good sign that something odd was going on. Anywhoo Geohot was a total douchebag when he released the key.

    1. Re:Godwin's law by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that there are going to be opposing viewpoints, but it's the volume and proportion of Sony-supporting posts that seems suspect to me.

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  77. What a coinkydink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How convenient just days after the Geohotz lawsuit... Almost seems coincidental how much that's going to bolster Sony's defense against opening their system up...

  78. I am surprised this didn't happen earlier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earlier this year, EQ2's records were compromised or something similar. My account was taken over, and a few fake credit cards were added to the account and charged for $50+ things (Mostly StationCash). The "billing" address was obviously fake as the name and address were just random letters. I tried to contact SOE about this, but I got a canned message back asking for information I didn't have. (The last credit card used, which was the fake one, and obfuscated on the account info. As well as a CD-Key for EQ2 which I didn't have because I don't keep my MMO boxes.) Since then my account has been locked and I am unable to log into it. So, somewhat similar to what is going on here, just earlier. Seems their cc verification system is either non-existent or easy to bypass.

  79. Re:And everyone was saying hacking their ps3 was o by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Sure it is his fault. He didn't exactly work with Sony on the security problem. Or did give them a couple week to fix the problem and not tell anyone? I must of missed that part. It seems to me he went and published everything as fast as he could. That he blogged about it, made Youtube videos, and posted the security key on Twitter. Were you one of those twits who posted it on Slashdot. Thanks a lot for that. Your concern for my privacy and respect for property rights are really appreciate. I am sure the hacker who accessed my data did all his own work and did not need it.

  80. Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There seems to be a big disconnect with all this.

    "A different group supposedly used this firmware to get on PSN through the developer networks, and also found that fake credit card numbers were not being validated for game purchases, leading to what chesh called "extreme piracy"

    "Sony just posted more details, saying that a massive data breach occurred"

    What does the first have to do with the second? The developer networks shouldn't have any access to PSN player information. The developer networks should have their own separate authentication setup and if the PSN login access is required for development, a fake PSN login service should be used (rather then having access to the real service). Checking for valid credit card numbers is trivial. Checking if the details (CC name, CC number, security code) are valid is standard procedure when processing purchases.

    Secondly, a massive data breach probably did not occur via consoles. It would be trivial to reverse engineer the login process of a ps3 on the network and then use a standard desktop to login to the PSN and poke around. It would not require any modification or hacking of the console to do so. Even then, chances are that people have been poking around at the PSN infrastructure due to the recent actions of Sony (suing Geohot for hacking the consoles).

    What we really need is Sony to come out and say "this is what happened". Chances are that they will blame hacked consoles for it so that they can use it against Geohot (I think that case is still ongoing). "Your honour, hacked consoles have cost us *BILLIONS* of dollars due to their use in hacking our online gaming service which we had to take down for (weeks, months, etc). There is no other way anyone could have gained access to our network (which is served over the internet but noone would be able to fake being a PS3 console to access it). They are also responsible for the loss of thousands of player's personal information. We need to prevent people from doing this and suing this guy into slavery will stop others from even thinking about doing the same!"

  81. Wonder if Sony skipped the security audits by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    Years ago the credit card companies came up with some very stringent rules for retaining credit card info. The fines are high for each card stolen. To be complaint requires regular testing from outside security firms. So either Sony skipped these rules which wouldn't surprise me, or the security firm is on the hook for this. Although one other option, and more likely, these rules make the industry sound good without actually making anything better.

    1. Re:Wonder if Sony skipped the security audits by alcourt · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an outsider who has worked on PCI for the last several years.

      There are a few ways this could happen. Sony could have focused on the sampled systems and forgotten another system. They may have been compliant at the time of the assessment and then allowed compliance to slip. There may have been a mitigating control on a non-compliance, accepted by the QSA, which turned out to not be as strong as believed. Or it may have been as strong as believed and caught the intrusion.

      There is too much we don't know at this point. Now that it is confirmed that there was a chance of exposure of credit card numbers, the silence makes a lot of sense. There's a whole set of procedures to follow if you believe payment card numbers have been compromised.

      What is likely to happen is if it is confirmed that credit card information was compromised, then there will be an investigation by the payment card industry into the source of the incident. This will then result likely in updated guidance for anyone who does credit card transactions that covers the area of the breach. Logging will be reemphasized to help detect attacks after the fact. (It always is).

      --
      "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend unto the death your right to say it." -- Voltaire
  82. Thanks so much, guys by Legal.Troll · · Score: 0

    for fighting for our freedom to use Linux on our PS3s by taking down evil Sony. Now, can you please stop?

    --
    "Outdated business models" is code for "I don't like paying for things, but want them anyway"
  83. Good Job Anonymous! Kudos! by Cito · · Score: 1

    I knew this was going to happen as well as did everyone when Geohot settlement hit. I hope they bring it to it's knees and forces Sony to beg for mercy from anon.

  84. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Most computers built within the past 5 years can run it and you can get one of those off Craigsist for LESS than the cost of the PS3.

    Again, most of my gamer friends have 5 year old -laptops- which somehow seem to not count as computers in the eyes of most PC gamers. And again, cheaper than the cost of a PS3 doesn't matter to the gamers OP was talking to, their PS3s are already paid for. If you could get a computer that could run portal 2 for zero dollars, then yes, it would make sense for them.

    And that's why it was a stupid suggestion.

  85. So what happens to VISA/MasterCard.... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    ... when 70 million cards get cancelled at once?

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
    1. Re:So what happens to VISA/MasterCard.... by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2

      I feel a disturbance in the financial industry, as if millions of gamer's credit cards were stolen, and then suddenly canceled.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
  86. Massive data breach . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony: As you sow, so shall you reap or, in the modern vernacular, what goes around, comes around.

  87. No Sympathy For The Devil! by lexsird · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder of all the people here that have such a hate on for Sony have ever owned and run a business? Or have they been involved with the gaming industry at any point of it's development?

    When you boil it all down to one thing in gaming, to it's essence in it as a business or entertainment, it's all about the game it's self. If you don't have "game", you don't have a product and you are done. Stolen Information? We can forgive that, crafting bastards are out stealing from everyone and they need burned for it. But cheaters!? Those we will NEVER tolerate as costumers. Face it, Sony knows this and will NOT let their PS3 go down in flames by being shredded by cheaters.

    Their head guy also died about a week ago. That might have something to do with this as well, because civilized people will take the proper time to mourn the loss of someone that great in their lives. Personally as nerdraged as I am about this, I keep myself in check, being respectful of those who have lost someone great to them. Not to mention, isn't Sony out of Japan? Could we have a heart? Haven't those people had enough horror for a while? They don't need to worry about their jobs because pissy haxors and angry internet nerds are raging at them.

    WTF? Where is our government in all this? I expected them to be dancing all over this like it's the hat in a Mexican hat dance. These fuckers never miss an opportunity to stick their noses into any Internet situation with their "Holy Cow, PROTECT THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN....for the children" shrill rhetoric. Are we seeing them look the other way while Sony a foreign based based company who competes with our precious Micro$oft, gets hammered?

    This is where it goes sideways, so hang the fuck on. This is what our government has had to say about all this shit. ... *crickets* NOTHING. Ok, what is it then with them and I don't want to hear the "we are conducting a thorough investigation". If they aren't all over this like a fat kid a chocolate cake by now, either they are: a. Retarded and have no clue wtf is going on, which is NOT comforting all things considered. or b. They know, but aren't doing anything for whatever fucked up reasons.

    Now I am sure they (Sony) have a PR department or something following internet forums. This issue has been going on a week and forums will catch it first, then a few blogs or sites will comment on it, starting with a trickle and building to a flood the longer this outage keeps up. I suggest they not hide this, for it makes the customers feel excluded and in fact, they should be more transparent. There might be a lot of old school people running Sony still, and for them business is war and an element of trust is always lacking in those who remember the nukes with bitterness.

    People complain about "ownership rights" in here, but yet they ignore the ownership rights of Sony. Look if you don't like their system so much, build your own! With so many people who are obviously so much smarter than them, it shouldn't be such a hard thing, right? You go build a gaming system and keep it secure from hacking cheaters and people who want to take it all apart and then complain that its not working right. When you have done all of that, I really want to hear what you have to say about all of this.

    I feel like I am going to the bank to make a withdraw and the bank has been robbed and people are cheering the bank robbers on. Well, the bank has no money now and I need some to pay my bills. WTF? Let me say this, this isn't some happy bandit gets the bad guy thing. That isn't how the real world works, mark my words, nothing good will come out of this for anyone.

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
  88. Re:why put up with this? Get a Gaming PC by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    your ps3 is a brick right now. it is obvious that sony is never going to do what is in your interest. They own the network, they own your hardware, they own the games you try to run. As many crap stories as I hear about consoles you have to ask why continue to take the abuse and just chuck the console in the trash.

  89. Beware of a Zombie onslaught. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this goes on much longer, we're going to have a plethora of pale-faced zombies roaming the *gasp* outdoors! All the poor souls who have been addicted to online gaming over the PSN are going to have to either sleep or actually go out and get some fresh air. ;) Seriously though, this could be the biggest loss for Sony. How long does it take before those addicted (or at least a strong habit) to online gaming are broken of it and find other stuff to do and never buy games or play online again?

  90. where you have placed your trust is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony has purposefully installed rootkits on home PCs. Your scenario of compromise via trusted channels is real, but you've chosen to trust the very people who have already done it in the past. Please do wait for the global mega-corporation to let you know that it is safe to connect to the internet again!

    1. Re:where you have placed your trust is awesome by Mysteray · · Score: 1

      Good point. I'm usually so security-conscious that my hands begin to tremble whenever I remove the network cable from its locked safety cabinet and connect my computer to the net.

      But one day in a moment of folly I thought "gee maybe it wouldn't be too dangerous to allow a simple video game to be played over my local LAN".

      Silly me. I'll never make that mistake again.

  91. This does not please Hitler by MotorMachineMercenar · · Score: 1
    --
    "We have an A-Bomb...what more do you want, mermaids?" --I.I. Rabi, speaking in defense of Robert Oppenheimer
  92. What's the PCI implications in this? by neolith · · Score: 1

    I'm certain that the PSN had to be audited as part of PCI-DSS compliance to process credit cards in the volume they had to. I'm sort of shocked that they didn't implement some sort of tokenization to process credit card data, but if they were storing complete card data... weren't they encrypted? If they did encrypt the data, did the hacker steal the keys too? Just how badly was Sony owned, anyway? And if they were just storing this plain text, then they and their auditor is going to have some serious 'splaining to do to the payment card peeps.

    They're going to have a long, difficult process ahead of them, with lawsuits, fines, loss of business, customer trust, penalties, processing fee hikes, etc. Might be while they're still down, that they literally CAN'T go back on line until they satisfy an outside QSA that they have their i's dotted and t's crossed. Don't get me wrong, they deserve what they're getting, but if CC info is involved, this becomes the new landmark PCI case. Should be interesting to watch for years.

    --
    Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com