Slashdot Mirror


Help Rename the Department of Homeland Security

Hugh Pickens writes "James Fallows writes tongue in cheek that U.S. Department of Fear, led by Secretary of Fear Malcolm P. Stag III, is running a poll. To what should we re-name the Department of Homeland Security? 'Possibilities include Department of ScaredyCatLand Security, reflecting the prevailing mentality of an era, and Department of Fatherland Security, to make us sound strong,' writes Fallows. 'There are many more to choose from, plus you can write in your own nominees. But act now, because the polls close Tuesday.'"

382 comments

  1. Gender of countries by nepka · · Score: 2

    Department of Fatherland Security

    I've always been wondering about this, and this line reminds me about it again. Why do countries have genders? Not every country is a man either - for example Russia, China and my country all view it as motherland. On the other hand, according to this, US and then several other countries view it as fatherland. Why?

    1. Re:Gender of countries by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

      The US has Florida, so it's male.

    2. Re:Gender of countries by dintech · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think Ministry of Peace would also be appropriate.

    3. Re:Gender of countries by pbandj · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along these lines as well. Miniluv might work too.

    4. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Germany under the Nazis referred to their country as the fatherland.
      This was a play on that use of the term, implying that the Department of Homeland Security is just a means for our government to gain excessive control over its citizens.
      "Your papers, please."

    5. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along those lines, how about:
      Ministry of Privacy
      Ministry of Freedom
      Ministry of Truth

    6. Re:Gender of countries by msauve · · Score: 1

      That's effectively been done, when the War Department changed to the Defense Department.

      Maybe Minfree (Ministry of Freedom)?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:Gender of countries by syntheticmemory · · Score: 2

      I think of DHS as standing for The Department of Hysterics and Suspicion.

    8. Re:Gender of countries by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      The US has Florida, so it's male.

      And we Europeans have Sweden.

      And we've got Finland :-)

    9. Re:Gender of countries by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I like this, it implies the reality of what the DHS advocates: "minimum freedoms".

      Maybe the department of unconstitutional (homeland) searches? or "duhs" pronounced "douche"? That would also be accurate.

    10. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "The Department of Forced Anal Intrusion"

    11. Re:Gender of countries by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1
      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    12. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure 'Homeland' was chosen to avoid 'Fatherland' because 'Fatherland' was used often in German Nazi propaganda.

    13. Re:Gender of countries by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      I guess the ancient Greek didn't know about Sweden and Finland then...

      Yes, Europe wears Italy, but such outside signs can be misleading :-)

    14. Re:Gender of countries by Evtim · · Score: 2

      No, I think Ministry of Love is the best choice...

    15. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ministry of LOVE

    16. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    17. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the United States is over-aggressive and fucks other countries.

    18. Re:Gender of countries by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, at least in Norwegian "ancestors" would be something like "forefathers" translated directly, just like "man" can mean both male or mankind. Land of our forefathers => fatherland. No doubt most countries have been patriarchies. Motherland I think mostly refer to the land itself, like most polytheist religions have earth and fertility goddesses, not gods. Literally that it refers to the country like a force of nature. You're wrong about the US though, I've never heard American use either motherland or fatherland. The closest they got is an uncle, Uncle Sam. Without overdoing the analysis, I think it has to do with US not being much of a nation state.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    19. Re:Gender of countries by fusiongyro · · Score: 2

      I don't think we see it as a fatherland. I'm not sure we ascribe a gender to it. We do have a female icon ("Columbia") but I don't think we refer to it as a motherland either.

    20. Re:Gender of countries by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Department of Hysterics and Stuff?

    21. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Federal Groping Departement

    22. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its because the other countries were asking for it by dressing provocatively!

    23. Re:Gender of countries by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Italy makes it clear that Europa is female. It's clearly a woman's boot.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    24. Re:Gender of countries by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      Italy makes it clear that Europa is female. It's clearly a woman's boot.

      Never seen a cross-dresser?

      Or do you think that Sweden and Finland are just a strap-on? :-)

    25. Re:Gender of countries by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Unlike germanic languages like English, in Latin languages everything has a gender. For instance, in Portuguese, Portugal, United States and Mexico are male, while France, Spain and Germany are female.

      Not that it makes any real sense. At the moment, France and Germany are taking turns fucking Portugal :-(

    26. Re:Gender of countries by russotto · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, according to this, US and then several other countries view it as fatherland. Why?

      The US does not view the country as "fatherland". Germany does, which is the why "Department of Fatherland Security" was proposed. Yes, it's a Nazi reference.

      Now that we've gotten Godwin out of the way, I always though "Homeland Security" was a perfectly good name; we just need to get them a modified version of the "SS" patches with an extra line, so it's "HS" instead.

    27. Re:Gender of countries by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Not every country is a man either - for example Russia, China and my country all view it as motherland.

      Oddly enough, the Russian word for any father-/mother-land is closest to "fatherland" (comes from the word for "father", isn't specifically "land", though), so even when you're talking about "Mother Russia", you'd still call it a "fatherland".

      But yeah, grammatical gender probably has a lot to do with it, "Russia" happens to be feminine in Russian. The word for "homeland" is also feminine, but "fatherland" (above) happens to be neuter.

      In general, I don't think people spend a lot of time thinking about genders of countries (unless they're in the process of making WWII posters).

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    28. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second the motion! Call it the "Ministry of Peace" and be done with the pretense!

    29. Re:Gender of countries by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

      Well, I have no citations to back this up.... one straightforward (pardon the imminent pun) historical reason would seem to be, simply that it's ok for a patriotic leader to "love" his country if it's in the feminine. Same with ships, etc.

      Some might call the U.S. the fatherland (Founding Fathers?), but the term is more associated in North America with Nazi Germany. The poll website linked (feardepartment.com) is very clearly satirical and I'm certain they're alluding to this.

      During the Civil War, an extra stanza for Star Spangled Banner used feminine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_National_Anthem#Additional_Civil_War_period_lyrics

      One final anecdote, when soldiers fight, they fight "for Lady Liberty".

    30. Re:Gender of countries by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Department of torture, rendition & extra judicial assassination. After all it's what they do!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    31. Re:Gender of countries by xmundt · · Score: 1

      Greetings and salutations....
                I do not know that I anthropomorphise the USA enough so that in my own head I hear it as being male or female. However, at least these days, I do look upon it as the world's largest kindergarten, considering the childish way that so many "adults" act.

                As for for the name of the security theatre, while I think it is a cute idea to change their emblem/patch to a "HS" logo, I suspect it would be simpler and more accurate to change its name to "Safety and Security". That way, the patch could be a simple and alliterative "SS". That should not be a problem should it???? While there are quite a few good folks in the organization, the overall tactics and goals of the bureaucracy are scarily close to that of the OTHER "SS".
                For what it is worth, there is precedent for this. At the University of Tennessee, the campus cops had the official title of "Safety and security". However, whoever ran it was smart enough that their patches spelled it out - no lightning shaped pairs of letters there. However, they did wear brown uniforms (which was an unfortunate choice) and, a fair number of them were so taken up with their "power" that they were bad for lording it over the students.
                regards
                dave

      --
      YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
    32. Re:Gender of countries by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      which is why we need to rename that group of goosestepping nazi-like fucks to Fatherland Security

    33. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know that makes California the butt!

    34. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're reading it wrong. Florida is the thumb, so we are sapient.

    35. Re:Gender of countries by RCL · · Score: 1

      In Russian every word has gender, primarily, but not always, determined from its ending. We don't use "it" (which is reserved for neutral gender only and would sound rude if applied to non-neutral-gender word), but "he/she" instead (note that this applies to words, not objects, e.g. "browser" is "he" because it ends with male-sounding -er, while "Mozilla" is "she", because it ends with female "-a").

      Thus, "Russia" which ends with "-ia" (-ya) is female, but "Soviet Union" was male, because it ended with consonant (in Russian language, too). "United States" are plural, so we say "they" (rare in actual usage though), while America is female (again, "-a"). China is male though (ands with consonant -y in Russian, Kitay).

    36. Re:Gender of countries by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's called fatherland and mother tongue because it may be the guy who owns the place but he still has nothing to say at home.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    37. Re:Gender of countries by Fnordulicious · · Score: 1

      You are wrong about the lack of grammatical gender in Germanic languages. Most Germanic languages actually maintain a system of grammatical gender, though in many it has been somewhat reduced from the Proto-Germanic model. English is one of the few Germanic languages that has largely lost grammatical gender, retaining it only in the pronouns ‘he’ and ‘she’. Scots and Afrikaans are similar in this regard. Dutch still has grammatical gender although it is no longer correlated to biological sexes, being divided into ‘common’ (merged from masculine and feminine) and ‘neuter’ depending on the article (de, het) and adjective ending (-e, nothing). West Frisian, Swedish and Danish are similarly structured. German retains a strong tripartite grammatical gender system, as do Icelandic, Norwegian, and Faroese.

    38. Re:Gender of countries by tbannist · · Score: 1

      How about the Ministry for the Reduction of Tourism?

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    39. Re:Gender of countries by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Makes sense given what comes out it, but the same could be said for Washington D.C..

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    40. Re:Gender of countries by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, there have been a few instances since they renamed it that we weren't at war. Oh, wait, maybe there weren't.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    41. Re:Gender of countries by hydrofix · · Score: 1

      Countries have no genders as far as I know. In Russian too, otecestvo means "fatherland", and it is based on otec, "father".

    42. Re:Gender of countries by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Well, it makes Los Angeles the arse. San Diego is the perineum, always smeared with the fecal detrius of it's neighbor.

      San Francisco is the sensitive small-of-the-back...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    43. Re:Gender of countries by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 1

      Ministry of Big Brotherhood

    44. Re:Gender of countries by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      In Canada we have Nova Scotia. P.E.I. (Prince Edward Island) is like our prostate.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    45. Re:Gender of countries by zoloto · · Score: 1

      It's a dick she' sucking.

    46. Re:Gender of countries by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Homeland was used ages ago when Oklahoma lost a federal building to a stunt Timothy McVeigh did. It's been around before that too.

    47. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chickenhawk - cos the land of the brave is still running scared.

    48. Re:Gender of countries by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      They should call it Central Services.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    49. Re:Gender of countries by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      shame this wasnt the first post, but IT IS the right answer

      --
      warning pointless sig
    50. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no testicles.

      castrated?

    51. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close, but not quite. I think it's more along the lines of the Ministry of Love.

    52. Re:Gender of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Ministry of Peace would also be appropriate.

      I second this

    53. Re:Gender of countries by bartoku · · Score: 1

      Eh, I do not know, Norway and Sweden are too far north to be phallic; I am dubbing them as two saggy breasts, Europa is a bit old.

  2. Department of by Moheeheeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wasting Taxpayer Money to oppress law abiding citizens

    1. Re:Department of by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I don't know who modded you down, but it must be because you forgot the word "department" or "ministry" or something, because otherwise it's an apt name.

      Actually, in the spirit of all the 1984 inspired responses, it should have the opposite name; "Ministry of Freedom," maybe, and then we can call employees "MFs".

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Department of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't forget it, he put it in the Subject line (which I find extremely annoying).

    3. Re:Department of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Canada, and Homeland Security has done alot to secure our border as well, because we attempt mirror security efforts on our side. It has come at a high price tag, but I am impressed with the security that they impose along our vast undefended border.

    4. Re:Department of by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And they're doing a great job. Nobody stole the border or even a part of it!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. I have it by toxickitty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Department of Unnecessary Services, I think it sums them up quite well.

    1. Re:I have it by Weezul · · Score: 1
      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    2. Re:I have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Department of Fatcat Subsidation

    3. Re:I have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Department of Eternally Expanding Budgets?

      Department of Fear Mongering and Traveler's Humiliation?

    4. Re:I have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that already covered by the Department of Redundancy Department?

    5. Re:I have it by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

      The great thing is that we have slashdot to post stories such as these, so we can all chuckle at our own cleverness and collectively attack the effigy.

      Seriously, why is this on slashdot? What about this is "news for nerds"? Where is the link to science, or where even is the new information? All we have is that someone decided to satirize a part of the government. Whoopdie do, how novel. Thats totally why I come to slashdot, to listen to someone else soapbox about the government and label it "news".

    6. Re:I have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like Department of Putting the Uppity Serfs Back in Their Place

    7. Re:I have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Department of Unnecessary Services, I think it sums them up quite well.

      DeUS would fit well with the god complex some of them seem to have.

      DUI ( Department Using Insecurity ) would also seem fitting.

    8. Re:I have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DoUS? Could also go for Department of Unusual Size.

    9. Re:I have it by ShogunTux · · Score: 1

      I tend to like Department of Homeland Insecurity. Also sums it up rather well, and isn't a drastic change in its name. It's also a lot better descriptively than the current name.

    10. Re:I have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. too ambiguous. it could refer to any department.

  4. SHIELD by DinDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division

    1. Re:SHIELD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe Strategic Homeland Intervention Taskforce would be more appropriate

    2. Re:SHIELD by dintech · · Score: 2

      Cover Us from New Threatening Situations
      Department Of Upholding Contravallations against Hostile External Societies

    3. Re:SHIELD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strategic Homeland Intervention Tasksforce

    4. Re:SHIELD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing I thought...

    5. Re:SHIELD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Department of Where the Fuck Are Your Papers Comrade

    6. Re:SHIELD by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division

      Close, but I think you mean:

      SPecial Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  5. Here's one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about "State Security"?

    Or, if you prefer not to change the original, "Staatssicherheit".

    1. Re:Here's one by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For anyone not familiar with this particular organization, shorten it to Stasi and think back to before the fall of the Berlin Wall. I like it.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:Here's one by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Besides, it has a nice acronym.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    3. Re:Here's one by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think the original you're looking for was called "Schutzstaffel". Which, btw, translated would be "security squadron", which is ... well, pretty apt.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Here's one by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      For anyone not familiar with this particular organization, shorten it to Stasi and think back to before the fall of the Berlin Wall. I like it.

      After the wall came down all the stasi officers got jobs as taxi drivers. They were really good at it because you could get in one of their cabs, tell them your name and they already knew where you lived.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  6. The obvious one... by demachina · · Score: 1

    Department of Homeland Insecurity which is what it actually is too.

    --
    @de_machina
  7. Department of Homeworld Security by masternerdguy · · Score: 1

    They've set their sights too narrow, Stargate had the right idea.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  8. Call it get your IP-address registered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call it get your IP-address registered, for once and for good

  9. Department of Security Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems like the obvious choice.

    1. Re:Department of Security Theater by richardkelleher · · Score: 2

      This is my favorite

    2. Re:Department of Security Theater by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Theater gives it far too much legitimacy. Department of Security Vaudeville and Keystone Koppery. Official music theme is Yakety-Sax from Benny Hill end credits. Que video of Pistole chasing the prophet Mohammed with upraised Billy Club.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    3. Re:Department of Security Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious advantage is that it can apply to the National Endowments for the Arts for a grant to continue it's long running "The Belt, the Shoes and the Muslim" and "Duck, granny's got 5 oz. of shampoo!" projects.

    4. Re:Department of Security Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about KGB?

      AIUI, KGB stood for "Ministry for State Security".

      Posting AC for the obvious reason

    5. Re:Department of Security Theater by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Win!

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    6. Re:Department of Security Theater by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

      (KGB) in Cyrillic.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    7. Re:Department of Security Theater by djKing · · Score: 1

      Get's my vote.

      --
      Free as in "the Truth shall set you..."
    8. Re:Department of Security Theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get's my vote.

      "Get is my vote" - WTF does that mean?

  10. Gestapo by cgfsd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gestapo Much easier to say, and the groups seem to be getting more and more similar each day.

    1. Re:Gestapo by RicoX9 · · Score: 1

      Schutzstaffel would be more appropriate. The Gestapo was run by Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS till 1939 then under the various German "Police" forces after.

    2. Re:Gestapo by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      To many connections the King George the 3rd. How about the "Department of Machs?" This would communicate well in a world that measures using units of "E."

      Dam, to cerebral, sorry.

    3. Re:Gestapo by SloWave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Back when Bush was still in charge I came up with...

      George's Electronic Security Transportation and Papers Organization

  11. Nod to B5 by sstamps · · Score: 2

    I always thought the "Ministry of Truth" had a nice uber-authoritarian ring to it.

    Unfortunately, we don't use "Ministry" in our governmental body names, so it would have to be "Department of Truth" or maybe "Department of Truthiness".

    Also could bookend the Department of Justice with the Department of the American Way.

    --
    -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    1. Re:Nod to B5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've got a bunch of Bureaus (http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/B.shtml and http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/F.shtml).

      Howzabout one more: Bureau of Truth and Trust. Would that make them the butt of all jokes?

      Brilliant, there are two entries in the directory for Bureau of Public Debt. Knowing the government I bet that second entry is costing us a bundle.

    2. Re:Nod to B5 by IICV · · Score: 1

      It makes sense, particularly whehn you consider the fact that when you run afoul of the Department of Truth, you get handed over to the Department of Corrections.

  12. Ministry of Peace. by Bovius · · Score: 2

    We already have a more appropriate name prepared for it.

  13. Minilove ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is "Minilove" an acceptable name ? That sounds like a doubleplusgood idea to me.

  14. I like acting by kiehlster · · Score: 3

    National Security Theatre Company. André de Lorde would be proud.

    1. Re:I like acting by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Well, many of it's activities are just for show, like airport pat-downs of children and the elderly or confiscating medicines if they're in liquid form.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    2. Re:I like acting by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Well, many of it's activities are just for show, like airport pat-downs of children and the elderly or confiscating medicines if they're in liquid form.

      Because nobody would ever smuggle weapons or explosives onto an aircraft by hiding them inside a child's clothing? Not even if they knew that children got a guaranteed free pass around screening at the airport, and therefore their chances of successfully getting contraband onto an airplane that way would be very high?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:I like acting by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      OK, here's the problem.

      I know my kid is not carrying weapons or explosives. I don't need some Goverment Groper to feel them up to tell me that.

      There is practically a zero chance that any child (or adult, for that matter) is a terrorist, and they all know whether they're terrorists, so Government Gropers just piss off the 99.9999999% who aren't.

    4. Re:I like acting by Speedcraver · · Score: 0

      I agree 100% with this .00000001 percent-er!

    5. Re:I like acting by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Might be because all of this effort has yet to actually catch somebody attempting to smuggle explosives on a plane... Y'know... "Just for show."

      --
      +1 Disagree
    6. Re:I like acting by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I know my kid is not carrying weapons or explosives. I don't need some Goverment Groper to feel them up to tell me that.

      You know that about your kid. Do you know that about my kid? Or are you just assuming that nobody would be evil enough to use their kid as a suicide bomber? (Because if so, that's a bad assumption to make)

      There is practically a zero chance that any child (or adult, for that matter) is a terrorist, and they all know whether they're terrorists, so Government Gropers just piss off the 99.9999999% who aren't.

      The point is, if you leave a hole open, sooner or later people will exploit that hole.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  15. Department of by Anonymous+Heros · · Score: 1

    Waste Of Money And Nothing WOMAN

  16. Closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    How about "Closed"?

  17. Department 1984 by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    Big brother monitor every move and revisionist history. 1984 a little late, but its here.

  18. Its a Trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a clever way for them to identify future terrorists and people who are too clever.

  19. As a person whose uncle was sent to Siberia... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I say we just be honest and call it "KGB-lite". Gestapo has too many letters and STASI just sounds too unpleasant.
    Of course, over time, it will outgrow the "lite" part of the name. They all do.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:As a person whose uncle was sent to Siberia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over time? They already disappear people to gitmo or find a friendly Euro country in which to do their extreme questioning. I'd say the lite has already faded away.

    2. Re:As a person whose uncle was sent to Siberia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say go back to the original German and call them the Gestapo, if that has too many letters how about the SS.

      Does Goodwin's law apply if they actually are fascists?

    3. Re:As a person whose uncle was sent to Siberia... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      They should take a lesson from Microsoft:

      KGB-ME.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    4. Re:As a person whose uncle was sent to Siberia... by ChrisLeif · · Score: 1

      Heimatsicherheitshauptamt :-(

    5. Re:As a person whose uncle was sent to Siberia... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hmm... step back from the original, doesn't quite work, prone to errors and unexpected behaviour, doesn't do what you expect from it and fails at any level...

      Yup, would be a good name.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:As a person whose uncle was sent to Siberia... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Name a single incident of DHS sending someone to GTMO or STFU.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  20. Department of Paranoia and Overhyped Bullsh*t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title pretty much sums it up.

  21. ADHSA by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

    American Department of Homeland Security of America

    1. Re:ADHSA by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      American
      Department of
      Homeland
      Defence

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:ADHSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American Department of Homeland Security of America
      in the United States

    3. Re:ADHSA by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      American Department of Homeland Security of America

      in the United States

      Department

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  22. In the red. by koan · · Score: 2

    How about "Dept of 500 Billion Dollars Wasted"
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/09/september-11-homeland-security-spending_n_953288.html

    Seriously folks how hard would it be to get SAM's in the country when cartels brings tons of coke and dope over the border? How hard would it be to sit at the end of a runway and use a .50 incendiary round through the fuel tank of a plane about to lift off?

    Hard shot? These anti-material rifles can shoot humans from 1.5 miles away.

    Why hasn't it happened then? Because there is no terrorist threat.

    Clearly we wasted our tax money on these incompetents, unless you like getting molested at the TSA check point (coming to a mall near you soon).

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:In the red. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Didn't Mythbusters disprove the whole "bullet to the gas tank makes the car explode" thing? I would imagine it's the same with a jet, not sure if "incendiary" makes a difference or not. Pretty sure it wouldn't EXPLODE all at once though.

      And I'm sure they gotta keep good enough eyes on the airfield that people wandering around would be noticed and stopped by security... AFAIK all the big airports restrict who can actually go into the airfield, and if you hang around outside you're not likely to be able to get off a good shot, plus you'd probably still be noticed hanging around the fence or whatever.

    2. Re:In the red. by koan · · Score: 2

      Well rather than commenting to me you should do the research, the fact is military around the World use the .50 for exactly that, and why does it have to explodes all at once?
      If a plane is lifting off it's going to fast to stop, if its wing fuel tank is shot with an incendiary round it is now a flaming plane taking off...what are you going to do at that point? Turn around?

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    3. Re:In the red. by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Maybe something more politically correct? How about "Department of Toxic Waste Department?"

    4. Re:In the red. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      you'd probably still be noticed hanging around the fence or whatever.

      Last time I checked the sell gillie suits in the same place as they sell .50 cal rifles...

      You're missing the point though: If terrorists wanted to attack the USA they don't need to go through airport security to do it.

      Anybody who thinks they do need to get through security is an idiot. Anywhere people group together is a target - including the queue for the scanners (bag of explosives+ball bearings detonated in the queue...?)

      Even if they did feel like going through security there's still easy/unstoppable ways to do it:
      * Put stuff up their asses where the machines can't see it.
      * Send several people through with small bottles of liquid explosive, put it all together in a big bottle on the other side ("small bottles only"? Duh!)

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:In the red. by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why hasn't it happened then? Because there is no terrorist threat.

      This. Times a million.

      If terrorists wanted to attack the USA there's nothing stopping them. Everything they need can be bought inside US borders and there's no shortage of targets to choose from.

      The TSA is a magic tiger-scaring stone. A very, very expensive tiger scaring stone. Not just in the money sense but in the freedom sense and the inalienable rights sense.

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:In the red. by koan · · Score: 1

      Yes and our primary concern in this day and age is being political correct.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    7. Re:In the red. by delinear · · Score: 1

      Apparently they did try incendiary and that was the only way they got this to work (I haven't seen the episode myself, but according to TVTropes).

    8. Re:In the red. by stiggle · · Score: 1

      Also, as the Air France Concorde showed - once you have a ruptured fuel tank the leaking fuel can be ignited from the back of the jet engines.

    9. Re:In the red. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Jet fuel is not that flammable, nor is there enough air present in the tanks. You would just have a hole in the plane and it would leak a little fuel.

      You are right though there really is no terrorist threat.

    10. Re:In the red. by drwho · · Score: 1

      OK, perhaps "department of ass-covering" and "How to get rich in the security business". We can sit here and think of all the ways that really bad things can be done be bad people without any threat from StatSec, but it is inadvisable to do so, because 1) someone might put your ideas into practice and 2) even if it wasn't you that gave them the idea, the StatSec might do some data-mining and come after you.

    11. Re:In the red. by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The TSA is a magic tiger-scaring stone. A very, very expensive tiger scaring stone. Not just in the money sense but in the freedom sense and the inalienable rights sense.

      One might also argue that the TSA is doing exactly what it was designed to do. By making all but the richest Americans (the ones who can afford private jets) go through these searches, they are gradually wearing down the public, conditioning them to accept regular intrusive searches and limitations on travel. This was one of the first things the Nazis did, too. It makes it harder for the peons to rise up and overthrow the government after they start doing the really bad stuff.

      Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that sort of thinking is happening (at least consciously) in the halls of Congress. What I'm saying is that the purpose for those freedoms that the DHS is pissing all over is precisely to minimize the chances of the really bad stuff happening later. As Thomas Jefferson put it, "A government afraid of its citizens is a Democracy. Citizens afraid of government is tyranny!"

      The more we tear down those freedoms, the closer we come to being another autocratic or oligarchic hellhole instead of a democracy. It is precisely for that reason that every true, patriotic American has a duty to defend the Constitution against these attacks in whatever way he or she can, and to resist any government actions that go against its spirit to the maximum extent allowable by law and, if need be, with acts of peaceful civil disobedience that are not allowable by law as well.

      God bless the USA.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:In the red. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Anybody who thinks they do need to get through security is an idiot. Anywhere people group together is a target - including the queue for the scanners (bag of explosives+ball bearings detonated in the queue...?)

      Of course, but crowds are pretty much everywhere. They have to give you irrational fears of something, fear of flying, fear of tall buildings, fear of subways, play on whatever fears people already have of such things. Because statistically it is very unlikely you will be killed in a terrorist attack. If you want to inflict a state of terror you have to make people fear to go about their lives.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:In the red. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      As Die Hard II showed - once you have a ruptured fuel tank, the leaking fuel can be ignited from the ground with a cigarette lighter.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    14. Re:In the red. by tommy8 · · Score: 1

      Explode or not a incendiary round to the fuel tank of an airplane would most likely cause a fire which is a very serious event to say the least.

    15. Re:In the red. by cusco · · Score: 1

      The next time you fly take a look as your plane passes the end of the runway. What's just outside the fence? Almost everywhere it's empty parkland since no one wants to live there, and if the leaves are off the trees you can see the bike paths, tents of homeless people, and firepits from where the high schoolers get together to get high. The end of the runway may be a mile or more from the security office, they don't have sufficient staff to patrol all of that fence line. Hell, most places don't even have enough staff to keep the damn geese off the median.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    16. Re:In the red. by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      God bless the USA.

      I never quite understood this. Are you saying "God *favour* the USA over other nations? Why should God do that?

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    17. Re:In the red. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No, the verb "bless" does not imply "more than anyone else".

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    18. Re:In the red. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Seriously folks how hard would it be to get SAM's in the country when cartels brings tons of coke and dope over the border? How hard would it be to sit at the end of a runway and use a .50 incendiary round through the fuel tank of a plane about to lift off?

      Hard shot? These anti-material rifles can shoot humans from 1.5 miles away.

      Human != Plane. remember the weakest parts of a plane are designed to survive hitting a bird at 900 KM/h without anyone inside noticing.

      Effective range of a Barrett M82 = 1,800 metres.
      Maximum Take Off Weight (MTOW) of a B777 = 250,000 KG.
      Take off distance at MTOW for a B777 = 2,500 metres.
      Take off speed at MTOW for a B777 = 250 KM/h.
      Length of runway = 2,700 - 5,000 metres.

      So if you put a B777 at the end of a 3000 M runway, Bubba would be behind the security fence in your truck which would be 500 m at least behind the end of the runway. The plane would need to be accelerating for 1700 metres before it would be at the maximum effective range. It would not be unusual for a B777 to be approaching 200 KM\h at MTOW (maximum take off weight). You'd need to make a shot at an armoured target that has a width about half a metre that is flexing, yawing and moving laterally. Your window of opportunity would literally be 3 or 4 seconds Not taking into account wind, drag or the coriolis effect that shot would be considered difficult for the best trained sniper. Bubba in his truck has no chance.

      Finally if you do manage to strike, you still have to penetrate the armour that is designed to handle the rigours of flight, if you penetrate, the aluminium skin, you've got the stuff that insulates the fuel tanks which is normally quite ablative (foam IIRC), then you've got to penetrate the tank itself which will be metal also. Beyond this you still need to create a spark capable of igniting the fuel as JP8 has a higher ignition point then 92 RON gasoline (the stuff Bubba puts in his truck).

      A SAM would have an effect, but not a .50 bullet. Then again, an Igla or Stinger is designed to damage small combat aircraft, they've been fired at Israeli airliners before, They dont do as much damage as people think due to the larger mass of an airliner and they have a tendency to miss in part due to the ineptitude of the operators. Then you have to hide your SAM and nefarious plans from the authorities and it's a one shot weapon, once you're done with one SAM, you wont get a chance to try again.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    19. Re:In the red. by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      I think he means the USA just sneezed.

    20. Re:In the red. by koan · · Score: 1

      You wrote all that and didn't Google it first?

      http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/top-50-caliber-sniper-rifle-manufacturer-barrett-firearms-boasts-that-50-caliber-sniper-rifles-are-capable-of-destroying-multi-million-dollar-aircraft-with-a-single-hit-54206857.html

      That's sitting on a runway, you could shoot the engine at take off as well, that should be "catastrophic"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Explosive_Incendiary/Armor_Piercing_Ammunition

      O my... it pierces and explodes I wonder what that would do to a commercial airline with "aluminum skin".

      Here let me paste it for you kiddo, since you are struggling to find it on your own.
      "The .50 Caliber round can accurately engage enemy targets at a distance of over 2000 meters which is over a mile away ! In fact a professional sniper can hit a 5 inch diameter target at a distance of 1½ miles and recorded shots have been reported from US snipers killing enemy soldiers from a range of 2,500 meters or just under 1.8 miles.

      The angle that the gun is held, plus the amount of wind blowing, the general weather conditions and stillness of the target are all calculated to make this kind of skilful shot.

      The .50 caliber bullet fired form a Barrett M83A1 or M-107 can easily penetrate 1½inches of solid steel armor plate, which is the normal amount of "protection" offered by most of the worlds Armored Personnel Carriers (APC's), Armored cars, trucks and other "light" vehicles. Generally speaking, as long as its not a main battle tank, the .50 caliber round fired from the Barrett at moderate ranges will penetrate it.

      A brick or a concrete wall that is about 1 or even 2 foot thick also offer no protection and can be shot clean through. Mobile or static radio trucks, parked up airplanes engines, buildings, fuel depots, rail tank cars, machine gun 'pill-boxes', bullet proof limo's, trucks, body armor clad enemy soldiers are all easy prey to the Barrett .50"

      http://www.vincelewis.net/rifle.html

      That is considered the "second most powerful rifle" and it can easily take out a jet screaming down a runway, 747, 787, and anything under that, I mean how many jets have 2 inch of steel armor? I am pretty sure that wouldn't fly, but then...I didn't bother Googling that since I have seen the power of these rifle first hand at a target range with non armor piercing, non explosive ammunition.

      Scary stuff

      Maybe you should get off your ass and go down to a 1000 meter range for a look see, (rent it and shoot it) it will change your life son, that is if you don't live in a state where they have managed to take your gun rights from you.

      I am amazed at the ignorance of the post to my comment, you people are sitting on the worlds largest database (The Internet) and you still pontificate without any idea of what you speak.

      Again under 30 and part of that waste of space generation, seriously one person commented that "myth buster" told him it wasn't so, your generation and the media...*sigh* do you ever think for yourself?

      Again I don't fly ever, but not because of the .50, I don't fly anymore because fascism in America is alive and thriving in the air travel industry, plus repairs in El Salvador, constant cost cutting, 8 hours or more locked in a plane on a runway with no rights what so ever, (this just happened locked in a powerless plane with no toilets...where's your rights there?) you are not any safer from "alleged terrorist" on a plane today any more than you were 10 years ago, if you think you are, you don't understand the n

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    21. Re:In the red. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US of A hasn't been a democracy for years now...

    22. Re:In the red. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You wrote all that and didn't Google it first?

      You wrote all that based on a manufactures claim that has never been proven. Of course the manufacturer is going to lie. They want to sell something. I suggest you actually get down to the airport, look at some real planes. See what they are made of and how small a target the vulerable parts are. Better yet, Boeing put their test video's up on the internet for all to see. Engines being vulnerable, LOL, these things are designed to withstand debris strikes directly to the fanblades at 900 KM\h further more, are designed to survive the loss of a fan blade. For decades, passenger aircraft are designed to have tolerances 50-100% greater then the forces they are expected to encounter in the worst real world conditions.

      Get out into the real world Bubba. A .50 rifle is no threat against an aircraft, especially since they vulnerable time is between decision speed and take off is about 5 seconds. At decision speed your aircraft will be moving in excess of 150 KP/h.

      You also ignored the fact that it would be incredibly difficult to hit that target. Missiles have been fired at aircraft and failed, hell this one was hit and landed safely. If it were remotely possible to bring down a plane with a .50 rifle it would have been done by now, there are enough Browning M2's and 12mm Soviet rifles in the real world that someone has no doubt tried and no doubt failed.

      Again under 30 and part of that waste of space generation, seriously one person commented that "myth buster" told him it wasn't so, your generation and the media...*sigh* do you ever think for yourself?

      This rant makes no sense and ha no bearing on the argument. Apart from ad hominem, after all if you cant defeat the point, going after the poster is just as good right. Second thing, I used science and common sense. You responded with marketing material. Talk about not thinking for yourself. Science vs media, I'm going with science on this one.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:In the red. by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      The TSA is a magic tiger-scaring stone. A very, very expensive tiger scaring stone.

      Except it isn't. Or the saying would go "See I've got this tiger scaring stone, and no tigers have attacked me." The passer by would then ask "Well what about that shoe bomb tiger that mauled you a few years ago?" TSA responds with "Ohhh well that stone didn't work, so I have this newer bigger, more expensive stone." "Ohhh well what about that underwear tiger? He wasn't scared of your little stone." TSA answered with "Yeah see the stone worked. After the tiger attacked, I was able to capture the tiger. I updated the stone too." etc etc etc.

    24. Re:In the red. by koan · · Score: 1

      You're wrong.

      http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/09/26/nyc-anti-terror-capabilities-include-ability-to-bring-down-aircraft/

      "Lee Rasmussen set a new .50 BMG Single Target World Record at the FCSA 2009 World Championships held at the NRA Whittington Center in Raton, NM 4th of July 2009 by shooting a 1.955" 5-shot group in the Heavy Gun Class 1000yd record competition and by doing so breaks the late Skip Talbot’s 2.600" long standing single-group record set in 1999 by over 1/2". Lee’s group works out to .1868 MOA."
      http://www.fcsa.org/wwwroot/index.php

      2 inch grouping at 1000 yards, a plane moving towards you at take off is as good as a stationary object, you get more than one try it is a semi auto.
      But lets say you aren't that good a shot, well then put it thru one of the engines, that target is 3 meters wide.

      All of the above showing you are wrong, your "science" is made up crap with special circumstances, no one is buying your BS and once again, if you're under 30 then almost your entire generation is muddled morons that watch to much TV, in fact 2 people here felt "mythbusters" is some how the final answer for these sort of things, just go to the range and look at something in real life rather than your LCD.

      Oh... get rid of your TV as well.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  23. Inter-dimensional Secret Security Service by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about security threats that exist in dimensions prophesied by String Theory? These areas cannot ignored, or death shall await us, for sure, from dimension N + 1 . . . with huge pointy teeth . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Inter-dimensional Secret Security Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . with huge pointy teeth . . .

      It's just a rabbit!

  24. Department Of Oppression and Molestation by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    AKA DOOM.

  25. DOOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department Of Orwellian Misrule

  26. Department of Steven Colbert by grilled-cheese · · Score: 2

    Department of Steven Colbert.

  27. KK by PPH · · Score: 2
    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:KK by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Man, I *love* stealing from shops!

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    2. Re:KK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or what they will inevitably become: The SS Division Totenkopf*

      ___
      * My grandma met them, and according to her, they weren't humans anymore, or ever. They must have been what inspired the Daleks.

  28. DIRT by MadCow42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Department of Rights Termination.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    1. Re:DIRT by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      Apparently I have issues creating valid acronyms too... :) Still, the description is accurate even if the acronym isn't.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    2. Re:DIRT by uncanny · · Score: 1

      Department of Indiscriminate Rights Termination

    3. Re:DIRT by bghost4 · · Score: 1

      how about Department of Inalienable Rights Termination

    4. Re:DIRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Department of Intentional Rights Termination.
      FTFY ;)

  29. The Nightwatch by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Babylon 5 reference.

    BTW, if you like sci-fi and haven't watched B5, you're missing a pretty good story.

    1. Re:The Nightwatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought B5 was great when I was 16. Now, it's just too obvious and too contrived. Plus, I happen to enjoy good acting these days. Almost all of the "human" characters were awful.

    2. Re:The Nightwatch by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I wasn't referring to the Nightwatch story thread per se in my claim that B5 is a good story. I was referring to the whole show overall. No argument that the Nightwatch story arc lacked nuance.

    3. Re:The Nightwatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know what would have made it a better story? More moral ambiguity. You've got the next Gestapo forming but they're also reasonably effective at protecting people from a menacing threat

      Apparently it makes for a more realistic story, though, since we've got effectively the same kind of thing occurring here without that "reasonably effective" sugar coating.

    4. Re:The Nightwatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is actually pretty scary how Babylon 5 predicted the DHS. In fact, the DHS basically is very, very much like the Nightwatch was shown. Reduce the Stasi-like use of "Informal Agents", but apart from that, you really have it.

      B5 ran 93 to 98, it only took half a decade where this horror-ministry was actually put into action.

      (The author added the armbands on purpose so every stupid idiot would what the Nightwatch was about. DHS should probably start getting some... might I suggest the colours red, white and black?)

    5. Re:The Nightwatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nightwatch pretty much sums it up.

    6. Re:The Nightwatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Babylon 5 reference.

      BTW, if you like sci-fi and haven't watched B5, you're missing a pretty good story.

      Fuck off with your goddamned Babylon 5. God almighty.

    7. Re:The Nightwatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about the Department of Homeworld Security. I thought about them when the DHS was first announced.

    8. Re:The Nightwatch by syousef · · Score: 1

      The Nightwatch were clearly modelled on the Hitler Youth/Gestapo and McCarthyism. It was historical, not prescient, though JMS was aware that history could repeat. The first reference is straight from the mouth of the creator JMS.

      http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/guide/044.html
      "jms speaks ....
      There's also a certain amount of McCarthyism inherent in the Nightwatch, the emphasis on revealing spies in our midst, enemies of the people.

      The problem with pointing to the Nazis or the Gestapo exclusively is that it allows us the safety of saying, "Well, it happened just there, and only once, *we* could never fall for that."

      Wrong.

      http://neatnik2009.wordpress.com/2010/07/13/babylon-5-in-the-shadow-of-zhadum-1995/
      "Series creator J. Michael Straczynski conceived of the series in the late 1980s and got it on air in the 1990s. He drew on history–in this case, from the Third Reich–think of Night Watch as similar to the Hitler Youth."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightwatch_(Babylon_5)
      "In the Babylon 5 science fiction universe, Nightwatch was an Earth Alliance paramilitary organization set up during the Presidency of Morgan Clark. Like the Gestapo of Nazi Germany, Nightwatch became the secret police organization of Clark's New Order."

      Similarly the Centauri Empire was obviously modelled upon the Roman Empire. Lots of other parallels with Earth history. Sheridan has been described as Christ like (dying then coming back from the dead)....

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    9. Re:The Nightwatch by mjwx · · Score: 1

      B5 ran 93 to 98, it only took half a decade where this horror-ministry was actually put into action.

      JMS borrowed the Ministry of Truth from Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, which was published in 1948. A bit of a nitpick but still.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:The Nightwatch by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      (The author added the armbands on purpose so every stupid idiot would [know] what the Nightwatch was about.

      The in-your-face, almost self-parodying obviousness of the Nazi parallelism in the original V series is what ruined it for me, so I don't think I could put up with it a second time...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  30. Security Thespian Society by bytestorm · · Score: 1

    Ignore the man behind the curtain.

  31. Miniluv, Ministry of Love by cpghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's only one reasonable name for it: Miniluv.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    1. Re:Miniluv, Ministry of Love by aeroseth · · Score: 0

      I was going to say this. ;)

      --
      "Is that real poncho or a Sears poncho?" ~~FZ
  32. GWBSTEC by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    GWBSTEC

    George W Bush Second Term Election Committee

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:GWBSTEC by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Didn't he already have a second term?

  33. Schutzstaffel! It's perfect! by moxley · · Score: 0

    I submit:

    Schutzstaffel!

    1. Re:Schutzstaffel! It's perfect! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I submit:

      Schutzstaffel!

      No, it sounds like a pastry.

      And now I'm all hungry...,

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Schutzstaffel! It's perfect! by moxley · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't eat any of their pastries....

  34. CSS by Zcar · · Score: 1

    "Committee for State Security", aka "Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti"?

    1. Re:CSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Special State Police'?

  35. DAFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of American Fear-mongering

  36. Don't be so modest. by Boona · · Score: 1

    I like it the way it is. Department is a standard in the US, homeland has a very nazi feel to the name and you want people to believe that the massive overarching department that spies on it's own citizens is trying to do so for people's security. Don't be so modest DHS, I think you've succeeded with your name. Though I suppose you could call it the comity instead of department, much like the 'K' in KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti) State Security Committee. It may not match other department names but it would fit in with the new Russian theme you're going with such as having tzars.

    1. Re:Don't be so modest. by delinear · · Score: 1

      Exactly, a lot of the alternative suggestions are trying to sound deliberately scary, whereas in real life we've often seen departments with the most benevolent sounding names commit the most horrendous acts, which in many ways has a much more chilling affect.

    2. Re:Don't be so modest. by wed128 · · Score: 1

      except the Russians haven't had tzars since before the Bolshevik revolution; so it kind of breaks with the whole communist theme...

    3. Re:Don't be so modest. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yeah when the DHS was first founded I was stunned at the name, sounded very authoritarian/dystopian. I guess the shock value just wore off over time.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  37. FUD by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think they should call it the "The F.U.D" and have a multiple accepted expansions for the acronym.

    Fear and Uncertainty Department
    Fundamentally Unnecessary Department
    Federal Unchecked Discretion
    F**ked Up Department ...

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nahh it should be Strategic Homeland Intervention Team.

    2. Re:FUD by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Department of OMG!

  38. How about Savak??? by scubamage · · Score: 1

    I think Savak would work. Orrr Schutzstaffel.

  39. "First stage" by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    the next stages... i mean, departments, will be announced shortly.

  40. James Fallows, consistently late by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The time to on about this was a decade ago when the DoHs was created. However, that's James Fallows. I remember clearly his 1987 series of articles on how the Japanese model of national economics was poised to overwhelm Anglo-Capitalism, and his weak questioning of the Iraq War in 2003, after the decision to go to war had already been made.

    The Department of Homeland Security is a mess, mind you, but that's as much implementation as anything else, it's designed to make it possible for Congress to monitor the security pork better, which had previously been scattered through the Federal Government, and therefore had no single cabinet secretary that could be brought in to testify and question, and no single budget bill to cut deals over. The problem is not the department, as much as it is that the United States has a pervasive fear in its population. For example, take a look at this gallup poll trend over the years on perceptions of crime: http://www.gallup.com/poll/150464/Americans-Believe-Crime-Worsening.aspx and then compare it to actual violent crime rates. Americans by a large margin believe that crime is getting worse, when, in fact, violent crime is going down. Note that the graph strongly corresponds to rhetoric on crime, and to personal economic, as opposed to physical, insecurity.

    It does not matter what the department is called, as long as Americans vastly over-rate the chances of dying in criminal or terrorist attacks, particularly in crimes committed by strangers or foreigners, as opposed to the far more likely case of being killed by someone they know. Statistically speaking, suicide is more common that homicide, and among homicide categories, being killed by a current or former romantic partner outweighs all other categories. But that's not what DoHs monitors by and large. Instead looked at in an unbiased fashion, for example this post at Reason magazine, http://reason.com/archives/2006/08/11/dont-be-terrorized terrorism is a lower risk that we run going out to drive, or consuming ordinary products.

    1. Re:James Fallows, consistently late by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Instead looked at in an unbiased fashion, for example this post at Reason magazine, http://reason.com/archives/2006/08/11/dont-be-terrorized terrorism is a lower risk that we run going out to drive, or consuming ordinary products.

      But any politician who scraps 'anti-terror' measures will be voted out if there's another major terrorist attack. This is why big government keeps getting bigger until it bankrupts the country and collapses.

    2. Re:James Fallows, consistently late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      "being killed by a current or former romantic MALE partner"

      There fixed it for ya.

    3. Re:James Fallows, consistently late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the core problem is Media Induced: Irrational Fear Mongering coupled with will full ignorance.
      So yeah, we are pretty much f*#&'d.

  41. Who knew Dr. Who had a name to call them... by MrSenile · · Score: 1

    Let's call them 'The Happiness Patrol'.

    Not only was it a great Dr Who episode (with good ol' Ace and the 7th doctor), but it paints a pretty grim picture that hits a little too close to the mark of how government works today.

    Win Win.

    1. Re:Who knew Dr. Who had a name to call them... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Please god don't give them ideas - what if they create the Kandy Man?

  42. I propose by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the true spirit of America, I propose a backcronym:

    RETARDED: REdundant Treasonous Americans Raping Democracy Every Day

  43. I propose a new strategy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    In recognition of their excellence in, and the cultural importance of, the art of Security Theatre as well as the DHS' impressive work in broadening the appeal of the Theatre Arts beyond stereotypical culture snobs, theatre tech geeks, and effeminate thesbians and into the untapped domain of jackbooted authoritarians, we should really place the DHS under the National Endowment for the Arts...

    They might find it a bit difficult, at first, being under a department with a budget of less than $200 million, and having cultural reactionaries hate your guts; but I'm sure that they would adjust. They might also find collaboration with some of the more opaque postmodern artistic movements useful in crafting future regulations. Imagine how resistant to the forces of government transparency and oversight they could be if future watch lists and legally murky policies were not only secret; but took the form of abstract expressionist paintings or heavily redacted found-object collage. Wikileaks and their ilk would be helpless!

  44. Central Services by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
    • T.V. Interviewer: How do you account for the fact that the bombing campaign has been going on for thirteen years?
    • Mr. Helpmann: Beginners' luck.

    Dibs on working for Information Retrieval.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  45. Ministry of Truth, Tranquility, and Freedom by caffinatedmouse · · Score: 1

    It might as well be a 1984 reference, that's what they aspire to. WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!!

  46. Rename? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd rename it to "the now defunct, disbanded Department of Homeland Security". The military is supposed to secure our borders, and in my mind "security" doesn't mean being secure against tornados and earthquakes. FEMA should exist, DHS should not.

    1. Re:Rename? by stiggle · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have a squiggle logo and call it "The Department formerly known as Homeland Security".

      OK, so Prince (or whatever he's calling himself these days) might complain

    2. Re:Rename? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'd rather say of it, "it's history".

    3. Re:Rename? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      I prefer DEAD. As in gone, tits up, its constituent particles and policies scattered, sundered, dissipated as unrelated transient sub-atomic particles and vanished in the stellar wind, along with all the mentalities responsible for it. It's only future should be as a precautionary-tale footnote to a "Brief History of the American Republic." Otherwise, that Republic itself will have a brief history.

      Meanwhile: Department to Eradicate American Democracy might do.

    4. Re:Rename? by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      OK, so Prince (or whatever he's calling himself these days) might complain

      "The Artist". Formerly known as The Artist Formerly Known As Prince.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  47. FedUPS by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

    ...since they handle more packages per day than those two combined, anyway.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  48. Got it by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

    The Department of Freedom and Privacy Why do the names of these things frequently say backwards of what they do (eg, DRM)?

    --
    Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
  49. Department of Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vote for Department of Security for a couple of reasons, first the initials DOS matches up well with Denial Of Service and second if reminds us of Franklin's saying about giving up Liberty for Security.

  50. This one is easy by haystor · · Score: 1

    Department of the Gravy Train

    --
    t
  51. It doesn't need renaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it should not exist.

  52. Your Government Is Too Large and Intrusive by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    I don't have a catchy acronym because its not funny.

    We are in the stages of being another Greece, we have grown our government beyond our means to support it. The real one percent is those in high paying government jobs. Yes I know that not all jobs are high paying in government but there are too many horror stories to just be a coincidence.

    Department of Homeland Security is Department of Jumped the Shark.... Time to start axing some Departments and this is a good place to start. Ron Paul seemed to have missed one.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  53. The National Guard by Khomar · · Score: 2

    We have had an organization charged with the defense of our nation for 370 years. How about we let them do their job rather than fight in overseas wars (and get rid of the expensive and excessive DHP)?

    --

    I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

  54. Real nature of DHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department for the safety of the state.
    Hey torture is already institutionalised, you have military tribunals, you have torture camps.
    Just copy the old KGB and you're good to go.

  55. Department of Wastefull Spending. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    The government estimates how much it costs to save one life for various activities and regulations.

    The EPA is willing to spend up to $9 million to save a single human life. And the GOP claims this is too much.

    The DOT (cars) and the FAA (plane construction) are willing to spend $6 million to save a single human life.

    The Department of Homeland Security is willing to spend $180 million to save a single life (as per the Federal Air Marshall's estimates).

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Department of Wastefull Spending. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The Department of Homeland Security is willing to spend $180 million to save a single life (as per the Federal Air Marshall's estimates).

      Fine. I'll take 1/2 of that and DHS can just bank the rest. If I'm blown up by a terrorist then it's on my head.

      We could balance the budget on this concept alone!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Department of Wastefull Spending. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a life of a white person, you mean.

  56. Kiss my DHSS by tepples · · Score: 1

    Schutzstaffel would be more appropriate.

    And it's new logo would be the logo of the band Kiss with KI turned into DH.

    1. Re:Kiss my DHSS by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I like the old sign for a local farm cooperative better - Southern States. They changed it to a more gentle, non-Nazi sign recently. If that image doesn't work, there's a tiny one at the bottom of this page.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  57. Rename the War on Terror by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's rename the war on terror to be more accurate too ...

    Virtual strip-searches, ball-fondling, never-ending but ineffectual id checks, forcing women to drink their own breast-milk, arbitrary rule enforcement, making everyone go bare-foot, singling-out people by the clothes they wear, forcing people to remove nipple rings with pliers, torturing injured flyers, making people piss on themselves, the list is practically endless.

    And yet the TSA hasn't caught a single terrorist.

    But they sure are doing a bang-up job of destroying human dignity. Therefore I say we rename the War on Terror to The War on Dignity.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Rename the War on Terror by RichM · · Score: 1

      The 9/11 attacks are more successful than Bin Laden probably ever dreamed of.
      The terrorists have won.

    2. Re:Rename the War on Terror by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      My personal favorite is still Joe Foss's experience. He was the former governor of South Dakota, a retired Brigadier General and WWII Ace. He was detained in Arizona (where he moved later in life) and nearly missed a flight when the TSA discovered a suspicious metal item in his coat pocket that they thought looked suspiciously like a weapon. The item?

      His Congressional Medal of Honor.

      That the loyalty of a man who has spent his entire life in service to his country and had been a recipient of the highest military award for valor in combat would be questioned because he carried his medal... words simply escape me.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
  58. Unicorns! by dragonxtc · · Score: 1

    I think they should rename it to "The Unicorn Society", i mean they are looking for non-existent things afterall

  59. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gestapo

  60. DGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of Gropeland Security

  61. Rename DHS by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Let's just call it defunct.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  62. Ministry of Love by Lagurz · · Score: 1

    ...all patriots must learn to love their country.

  63. "Now-Obsolete Department Of Homeland Security" by littlewink · · Score: 1

    gets my vote.

  64. Baby + Bathwater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Okay, a lot of pretty fair slams on DHS here. Yeah, it's an impressively fascist name and it works like absolute shit at the department-level. Many of its agencies do good work, though. US Coast Guard, Customs, FEMA (when not run by Michael Brown), Secret Service. Any component of DHS that they moved in from other departments tend to work decently, while new ones they created, like TSA, work for shit. It's easy to condem the whole department but that's a superficial way to look at the problem.

    The real problem was putting people who fundamentally don't believe government can work in charge of making government work.

  65. Department of Patriotism by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 1

    Who can argue with that.

  66. What about M.I.L.F by stanlyb · · Score: 1

    Ministry of Instantaneous and Last Freedom?

  67. Fews Things Disapoint Me More by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    The DHS name has inspired cowardice, and when America needed its government department's help the most? It, and its thoughtless leader had better things to do. Hard? It's public record.

  68. DAMNIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of Absolutely Meaningless National Insecurity Theater

  69. "The Department" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because when I worked for a company that did work for the NSA, we had to call it "the agency"

  70. Forseen in Boris The Bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    United
    States
    Emergency
    Law
    Enforcement
    Secret
    Service

  71. DOH by spads · · Score: 1

    Department of Homeophobia

    --
    Bukowski said it. I believe it. That settles it.
  72. Ministry for State Security, of course. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    In German. Or Russian. Or maybe Chinese.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  73. Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they finally admiting the crashed UFO in Rosswell and a Goa'uld Ship in Fairbanks? Then it's "Home*world* Security", otherwise, too bad, you stay the beloved DHS.

  74. How about we get rid of it? by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    Seriously, it's going to grow as structured. Soon we will be enduring their crap on every form of transportation there is.

  75. departement of 4-letter words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    need I to say more?

  76. Former!! by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

    How about the Former Department of Homeland Security? Because it should be dismantled.

    --
    "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
  77. Department Of National Tranquillity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice and Orwellian with an American flavor.

  78. I had to ask by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    "Are you from the Department of Upperclass Hooligans?" "D.U.H.!"

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  79. A.S.S.H.O.L.E.S. by DocZayus · · Score: 0

    A.S.S.H.O.L.E.S. American Security Services, Homeland Operations, Law Enforcement for the State

    --
    -- http://www.doczayus.com/
  80. rename it to ISSS by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    Internal Surveillance and Security Service

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  81. Mystery Security Theater 3000 by stiggle · · Score: 1

    We've already got the rip tracks for all their actions done anyway.

    1. Re:Mystery Security Theater 3000 by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

      Brilliant response. Would mod you up if I could.

  82. Deparment of Patriotism by Froggels · · Score: 0

    If you don't like it then you're not patriotic and might be a terrorist.

  83. What about RSHA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reichssicherheitshauptamt, commonly translated as as "Reich Security Main Office". (Of course it was much smaller than the department of Homeland Security, it had only 30.000 employees vs 200.000 for Homeland Security)

  84. CTU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, too obvious...?

  85. I think just translating to German often works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Abteilung Vaterland Sicherheit"

    It will be a trick for Americans to learn to pronounce, but it's good practice to prepare them for "papiere, bitte".

  86. Renaming Committee by OutputLogic · · Score: 1

    First, they have to form a Committee for Renaming the Department of Homeland Security.
    Second, the committee has to work for two years and draft a 1000-page conclusions document.
    Third, there has to be a nation-wide referendum.
    Fourth...

  87. I have it by dayton967 · · Score: 1

    Big Brother!

  88. PolitBureau by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    how about Bureau of Cultural Enforcement

    --
    C|N>K
  89. I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of Homeland Security Theatre.

  90. Department of Fear by markhahn · · Score: 1

    short and sweet. of course, all the previous suggestions to name it "defunct" would be even better. for a more pointed suggestion:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Public_Enlightenment_and_Propaganda

  91. D.P.C.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of Public Cavity Searches

  92. Dept. of Inverse Causality by Torodung · · Score: 1

    Retask it as the Department of Inverse Causality and Kabuki (DICK). Their motto can be "preventing yesterday's threats tomorrow." Anyone care to take a stab at translating that into Latin?

  93. Dystopia Homeland Security by unlocked · · Score: 1

    Dystopia Homeland Security, Torqueo Patria Obsidis (Distorted/Tortured/Twisted Homeland/Fatherland Hostage/Security)
    It was hidden in plain sight all along.

  94. Department of Never Gonna Give you up. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Department of Information Retrieval.

    would be my favorite but perhaps we should go with the spam voting meme and as a group astroturf this:
    Department of Colbert

    Another direction would be the
    Department of Never Gonna Give you up.

    If you think about the lyrics it actually makes a strange sense.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  95. Re:Simple: by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I believe "Hedge Fund Department" would make BOFA more inclusive, because WF, CITI, and CHASE seem to have equal powers.

  96. Grope-on by istartedi · · Score: 1

    The Federal government should privatize it, retaining options at low strike prices. Then they can seek venture funding, have an IPO, sell into the general market, and reap enough profit to help make a dent in the national debt. The new, privatized TSA should be called Grope-on.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Grope-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new, privatized TSA should be called Grope-on.

      a subsidiary of Snoogle Inc?

  97. Department of Defense by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    Well, "Department of Homeland Security," to me, implies a department that's responsible for keeping US territory (the fifty states) safe. You know, defending it. So I would propose that we call it the "Department of Defense." Oh, wait, there's a problem because we already have some other department called that. But that department isn't really concerned with defending US soil, and it hasn't been since 1945. So I would propose that we do the following:

    The thing currently called the Department of Homeland Security becomes the Department of Defense.

    The thing currently called the Department of Defense becomes the Department of Invading Asia and the Middle-East.

    Once we have the names straightened out, we can cut funding for anything being being done by the new Department of Defense (former DHS) that does not defend US territory. Oh, wait, that would imply defunding the whole thing.

    1. Re:Department of Defense by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

      Well said. I was just about to post this:

      Call it the Department of Defense. Then we can call the offensive military services the Department of War. Let's just call a spade a spade and stop this Orwellian pussy-footing around.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    2. Re:Department of Defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing currently called the Department of Defense becomes the Department of Strategic Interests.

      There FTFY.

  98. Get smart by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    How about the obvious:
    Dept of CONTROL

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Get smart by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Protect the 1% from the 99% Department. Department of Hoard Safekeeping ie protecting the ill gotten gains of a psychopathic minority from ever returning to it's victims. Here's betting their skulking about in force at the Occupy Wall Street protests, profiling, recording and investigating everyone there, except of course the creeps in the offices who actually stole billions of dollars, in one scam after another.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Get smart by lennier · · Score: 1

      How about the obvious:
      Dept of CONTROL

      But 99, we have to kill steal lie and destroy. We're the good guys!
      Anyway, you terrorists better just give yourself up. This country is completely defended by the most advanced nuclear military in the world.
      You don't believe that, huh? Well would you believe...the cheapest dozen defence contractors we could buy at the Wal*Mart five buck special?
      How about one really angry bobcat?
      Hold on a moment, I'm getting an incoming Facebook message on my iShoe.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    3. Re:Get smart by deniable · · Score: 1

      Department of Internal Control. A bunch of DICs.

  99. Best by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    How about "That Department we disbanded in 2012 because we all recognized the stupidity of security theater and the costs in wealth and public good of the ridiculous overreaction to 9/11 cost us?"

    Or is that too long?

    --
    -Styopa
  100. B5 by dasherjan · · Score: 1

    Department of the Nightwatch

  101. The Unnamed Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of "Shut up citizen! We don't have to tell you who we are!"

  102. Depends on how you like your irony. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    It needs to be renamed the "Ministry of Love" or the "Department of Frightened Old Women" depending on which direction you want to go with your irony.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  103. DICKS by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Department of Inequality, Capitalism, Korruption and Servitude

    Sorry, couldn't think of anything good that starts with "K"

    1. Re:DICKS by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      Killing...starts with a K...would fit perfectly.

  104. Department of SAFETY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Following in the tradition of the USA PATRIOT act, the PROTECT act, and others like them (naming it to the exact opposite of its actual goal) we need to rename them to something like the Department of SAFETY - Securing American's Fear of Everything Threatening You.

  105. Ministry of Silly Walks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ministry of Silly Walks

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZlBUglE6Hc

    I say give them something useful to do for once.

  106. Now that's easy: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    GeStaPo. Geheime Staat Polizei (Secret National Police).

  107. DFYTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of Fuck You, That's Why.

  108. The Committee For State Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's KGB if you know Russian.

  109. How about the Stasi, or Big Brother ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Nuff said

  110. Call it what it is. by lfp98 · · Score: 1

    Rename DHS the Department of Defense, and rename the current Defense Department the Foreign Legion.

  111. How about dept of does not exist any more by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    The only good dept of homeland security is a lack of one. Let the coasties go back to rescuing people and stopping smugglers.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  112. Internet polls, the real news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone created an internet poll! ALERT THE PRESSES!!!!11

    Seriously, is this even a story?

  113. And nobody expects... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    the Spanish Inquisition.

    Of-course the Spanish Inquisition didn't by default assume that everybody is a terrorist, unlike DHS.

    DHS shall be ironically known as Department of Honor and Selflessness.

  114. Department of Fatherland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of Fatherland Security

  115. Department of International Perception? by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    - (State Homeland Investigation Taskforce) - aka DIP(SHIT)

    As a non-USAer; I have to say that the DHS has been doing an excellent PR job for your country.

    I too think something in German or Russian would be appropriate. Amerikanischer Staat Schutz?

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  116. Judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dredd

  117. Department of by a9db0 · · Score: 1

    Security Theater

    Motto: "Wasting billions making millions feel not one bit safer"

    --
    -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
  118. A few ideas... by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

    Department of reConstitution
    Department In Constitution Killing
    Ministry of If You Have Nothing To Hide Then What's The Problem?
    Order of the New World
    Department of Look Over There
    Ministry of Get Used To It Because You are a Plebe
    New NotSee Agency (bonus points for anyone who really gets this one)
    Reformed Agency Protecting Everyone

    Really, what's the point of an exercise in renaming it? Those that pay attention to the real plight will be mildly entertained, and those that do not will see only lame government-directed jibbery.

    1. Re:A few ideas... by javanree · · Score: 1

      Department of Institutional Paranoia

      And if you'd swap "order of the new world" to "new world order" Mr X & Mr Y already have the department soundtrack ready :)

  119. How 'bout a little fire, straw man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen one single person claiming you can't possibly ever smuggle stuff using children as mules. Please point out where someone made that claim?

    However, you can also smuggle stuff in a half billion other (mostly easier) ways. Therefore, although mandated groping of children at gunpoint is certainly a highly effective way to attract child abuser pervs into government service, it's also a pretty ineffective strategy for preventing smuggling. It hits only one particular, unlikely scenario while having obvious bad side effects (like parental anger).

    So, if you want to stop smuggling, you'll need something better than subsidized child molestation, sorry. Keep trying, though - at least you have a clear goal. The TSA/DHS doesn't seem to have any useful mission, unless you count keeping Americans well terrified and submissive as a mission. They've certainly done nothing to reduce terrorism or smuggling so far, all progress that's come on that front so far has come from the military and the FBI.

  120. Fatherland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fatherland Security because it sounds like it is.

  121. Orange, like clockwork by caywen · · Score: 1

    The Department of Perpetual Orange, with possible Yellow heading into this weekend.

  122. How about... by davmoo · · Score: 1

    Department of Fucking Idiots.

    or

    Department of Unpatriotic Mentality.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  123. How about 404 Department Not Found? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all in the subject.

  124. Its fine the way it is by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

    Germany had the Fatherland, Motherland had the Soviet Union, and the US has Homeland.

  125. Randland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, let's all mock Libertarians some more even though if they had any say the department of Homeland Security wouldn't even exist.

  126. AlQaeda@home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Following the story on Slashdot that the Department of Homeland Security mandated X ray machines in US airports that can be shown to lead cumulatively to the early deaths of hundreds of US citizens each year, than they effectively became the US branch of Al Qaeda, didn't they?

  127. Bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about just plain "Bloated Fed Agency #8487493"

    I was at the Southwest Airlines xray line in San Diego around 8:30 Thursday night.

    I counted 3 people, including myself, in line. And at least 12 TSA agents on the clock.

       

    1. Re:Bloat by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      How about the "Department to hide rampart unemployment"?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  128. No. by UNFAIRMAN · · Score: 1

    No, now is not the time.

    A new name implies a new focus, new processes, or at least a new mission attitude.

    To rename it now is to embrace the department's need for PR image update, but without a clear new mandate it is just enabling 10 years of the same outdated behavior.

    I appreciate the humor of the OP but this is the kind of idea I could see being promoted in the halls of DHS.

  129. Stop thinking scared. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of the suggestions in this thread make the unfortunate mistake of being scared of the bogeyman that is DHS.

    Call it something that defangs it, like "Department of the Congressional Campaign Treasury" After all, that's exactly what it is. Big money for the contracts, for the jobs, pours into the campaign coffers of the damn Hillsters.

    We used to recognize the money trails. We used to call a copyright act the "mickey mouse protection racket."

    The old is new again, so feel free to call out the monied interests. They were the ones that set the course of this country into that iceberg that we slammed in 2008, and they're currently making record-breaking profits on selling access to lifeboats and first aid.

  130. WHY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why exactly does it need renamed?

    The only reason I can think of is because so many people are pissed off at the actions the agency has taken and is behind that renaming it will fool a lot of people into thinking Homeland security does not do evil, or does not exist anymore.

    Leave the name alone, and simply clean up the act; Not the evidence of the act.

    1. Re:WHY! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because we all know shit doesn't smell anymore when you paint it white. Never noticed how everything that has a bad name gets renamed? There's a reason you don't have monosodium glutamate in your food anymore. Only yeast extract.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  131. Seriously by optimism · · Score: 2

    Top-level orgchart for DHS:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Homeland-security-orgchart-2008-07-17.png

    Suggestions:

    1) Put FEMA, plus the search & rescue part of the Coast Guard, under the Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS). Put the policing part of the Coast Guard under the DoD and/or Commerce.

    2) Disband the TSA, and require private parties to control their own security. Let each airline specify their own security checks, to a regulated baseline. If you the consumer don't like the level of security, you can choose a different airline that makes you take off your shoes, or that asks you intelligent questions instead of stupidly frisking you, etc. Let the market decide.

    3) Split the Secret Service into its separate functions under the Treasury (counterfeiting etc), President/VP (protection), and State (protection).

    4) Put Customs under the Dept of Commerce.

    5) Put Immigration under the Dept of State.

    6) Send the higher bureaucracy of DHS to an isolated island in the south pacific, where it will implode within a matter of days under its own weight and paranoia.

    7) Nothing is left to rename. Move along.

  132. I have a better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how about "unemployed".

    1. Re:I have a better idea... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Best suggestion so far.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  133. J.A.C.K.A.S.S.E.S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judicial Amnesty Cancellation Klub And SchutzStaffel Expeditionary Staff

  134. DHS by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

    How about we keep the name but only refer to it in the historical sense? As in, "Remember when the Department of Homeland Security existed and made everyone's live miserable with no noticeable improvement in homeland security?"

  135. Re:Simple: by flaming+error · · Score: 1

    That's pretty much the entire "Federal Reserve". We may be converging on a root problem here.

  136. Smelly department of cuddy fattyness by makubesu · · Score: 1

    oh sorry, I thought if we were going to do name calling, I'd better ask an elementary school kid.

  137. Why not rename it... by lexsird · · Score: 1

    The Department of Fascist Enforcement of the Police State of America, because frankly that's what it is.

    Seriously, it's all some Nazi bullshit that we should jam in their ass this next election. I got a feeling this next election cycle will be another "fuck you all, your fired" voter reaction. We just need some people that will actually do as we want them, not as they are bribed.

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
    1. Re:Why not rename it... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Election? Ah, you mean the choice you get between shooting and hanging? Ok. I'm sure next time we'll choose hanging instead of shooting this time and it will be all better soon afterwards. Though... last time we chose shooting because we didn't enjoy hanging anymore. But this time it's going to be all different and we'll be so much better off.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  138. ooh oooooh oooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Mother of all Fatherland Departments?

  139. Rename. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Praetorian Guard.

  140. I got a couple. by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

    The Department of Fear Uncertainty and Doubt. The Department of Homeland Uncertainty

  141. describe it both figuratively and literally by Initi · · Score: 1

    ministry of peace, love, and the rubber glove.

  142. They Hate Us For Our Freedoms by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Virtual strip-searches, ball-fondling [boingboing.net], never-ending but ineffectual id checks [nypost.com], forcing women to drink their own breast-milk [usatoday.com], arbitrary rule enforcement [hotair.com], making everyone go bare-foot, singling-out people by the clothes they wear [nydailynews.com], forcing people to remove nipple rings with pliers [rackjite.com], torturing injured flyers [podiatry.com], making people piss on themselves [msn.com], the list is practically endless.

    And yet the TSA hasn't caught a single terrorist.

    You seem to have missed the entire point. George W. Bush was right there on TV 4 hours after the 9/11 attacks announcing that the UBL terrists did it and they Hate Us For Our Freedoms.

    So, he went about implementing DHS to take away our Freedoms so that the terrists wouldn't hate us anymore.

    Now that we're guilty until proven innocent and treated like sheeple at the airports and at random papers-please checkpoints around the country, whilst the government taps our phones and sends agents to infiltrate church groups, the terrists no longer have any reason to hate us.

    So, of course the TSA hasn't caught any terrists - they prevent them from needing to attack in the first place!

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  143. Orwell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, it should be called "Big Brother". Or the "Department of Useless Expensive Machines".

    They can have the slogan "We've never met a terrorist that we ...", well that obviously needs to be shortned to "We've never met a terrorist."

  144. Wordy but by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Department of Terrorism Mission Accomplished

  145. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Updated for a new age...
    Ministry of Peace, Love and Tolerance.

    Fuck you Orwell hater mods!

  146. The guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of that thing.

  147. The Kindly Ones by MahGu · · Score: 1

    A Greek euphemism for the Furies.

  148. Germany Lives Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about WSSR, for Waffen SS, Reconstituted?

    DHS has to be the most ineffective government agency I've ever dealt with.

    Seriously, can't they find some method to find bad guys that doesn't involve long lines and ineffective searches?

  149. bab5 by villain222 · · Score: 1

    How about the "nightwatch".

  150. The Suede/Denim secret police? by smapdee · · Score: 1

    The Suede/Denim secret police, just to acknowlegde that we are somehow living in a world accurate predicted by Jello Biafra.

  151. FEARMONGER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Federal Early Action Rights Modifier of Non-Global Exceptional Rights (FEARMONGER).

  152. Fater Land by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    I have always hated the name. It smacks of Nazi Germany and the father land. I see it as an attempt to start people identifying with the land and not the democracy and freedom. It is the next step (as in the Patriot Act ..) that you try to get people to give up the country and our constitutional rights to protect the "HomeLand" as if the land and whatever form of autocratic government would evolve would be OK because what was important was the "Homeland" not the country, not America, not our freedoms and liberties. You notice its the Republicans that wave the flag, name things "Homeland", push forward the Patriot act and other simiar "streamling" of removal of our protections and freedoms in the name of God and the constitution. Of course the real agenda is to lock down profits, copyrights, patents, eliminate bankrupcies, eliminate restrictions that would have prevented most all the economic disasters in recent history, all from preservation of the top profits.

    Snake oil salesmen are not dead, they just joined the party.

  153. A complete waste of time and money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The post title pretty much say's it all. This is just an excuse to allow the government more intrusion into the lives of private citizens.

  154. Torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm torn between:
    Ministry of Truth
    Ministry of Love

    Because they really perform both functions already...hmmm...

  155. I believe the appropriate name, out of history, is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Das Schutzstaffel - fits perfectly. Even already have a snazzy logo and uniform.

  156. Heimat Sicherheitsdienst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H-SD for short. ..."tasked with the detection of actual or potential enemies of the Nazi leadership and the neutralization of this opposition." (From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicherheitsdienst.)

  157. New Name by Casca1 · · Score: 0

    Gestapo?

  158. A good name for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Department of Security Theater

  159. DFM: Department of Freedom Management by mbkennel · · Score: 1

    Delivering Managed Freedoms Across The Enterprise(tm)

    Fascism is indistinguishable from any parody thereof.

  160. Department of Erroneous Reporting Practices by phoncible · · Score: 1

    ...or DERP. Their agents can be DERPs and DERPettes, and they'll go around the country doing DERPy things to better DERPify our country.

  161. Homo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the cute diminutive form - ie "homo" would work.

    And who would work there?

    Homos, of course.

  162. Department of Terrorism by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Seriously. Let's look at the stats.

    Damage done by terrorists vs. damage (cost) from DHS?

    Damage to freedom by terrorists vs. damage from DHS?

    Fear and uncertainty caused by terrorists vs. fear and uncertainty caused by DHS?

    the only thing the terrorists are still leading at is "people killed". But we're working on that.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Department of Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're indeed working on it - just give the cancer rates a few more years.

  163. Re:I believe the appropriate name, out of history, by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And it would be as wrong as the whole department. (It's "die", not "das").

    Fitting.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  164. Here's what we do. by Sitnalta · · Score: 1

    Rename it to The Federal Bereau of Investigation. Because it's their fucking job anyway.

  165. Department of Constitutional Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    although Security Theater, We're Here To Help, and Former are favorites as well.

    The current state of things appears be like trying to implement the Professionalism and Responsibilities of the FBI with bureaucrats.

    The folks are smart, dedicated, and hopefully mean well, but it attitude just isn't there.

    The results are entertaining, but the risk to the constitution is troublesome.

  166. Department of Homeland Stupidity by xednieht · · Score: 1

    Gets my vote

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  167. Department of Paranoia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Nuff said.

  168. Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MiniPax. We all know it is.

  169. BACK ON TOPIC by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    I suggest that they rename TSA to STASI or maybe NKVD.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:BACK ON TOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in prison somebody will stick his Sweden up your North sea with his Finland gently banging against your moon...

  170. I'm too afraid to post what I really think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose I should use a fresh VM, from a different subnet going through TOR to post this.

    K -
    G -
    B

  171. Simply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rename it "Department of Homeland Stupidity". At least you wouldn't have to change all the badges and crap that has acronyms. A better choice would be disbanding the whole freaking mess.

    And what the fsck is up with Slashdot? These new captchas are bloody impossible to read and only work about 25% of the time. Seriously, I'm about ready to defect to someplace like theregister.co.uk that at least does'nt present me with a mangled mess of a page half the time I try to drill into something.

  172. Department of Homophobes's Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way it reflects who it is serving and there is no need to spend money changing stationery (as long as it said DHS)

  173. The Department of Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome home!...
    NOW STRIP!

  174. Rename? Rebrand more like it by initialE · · Score: 1

    Companies regularly undergo brand renaming when they conveniently want their bad history to dissolve in the public eye. Don't let the US government do the same.

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  175. FBU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Federal Bureau of Underpants

  176. Department of by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Bend Over and Enjoy It
    We're Listening All the Time
    State Secrets
    Granny is A Terrorist
    Transportation Strip Searches
    Transportation Cancer Screening
    We're Going to Fondle You Now
    Baby in Carrier is a Terrorist
    9 Oz. Prevention
    Let Me See Your Papers

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  177. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geheime Staats Polizei

  178. blankie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warm Cozy Blankie For All Bed Wetting Losers Willing To Sacrifice Liberty For Security But Will Get Neither?

    WCBFABWLWTSLFSBWGN

    I know what you are thinking. I left out the word Nazi or Fascist but I thought that was going too far :)

  179. Excellent comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we just need to track down everyone's identity, and we have a nice slice of those critical of our security apparatus, ripe for interrogation. A sincere round of thanks from your local branch of psyops.

  180. U-SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    United-States Histerical Intellitence Terrorists.

    ?

  181. Department of War Propaganda by cnxsoft · · Score: 1

    scare the people and tell them we live in a dangerous world, so that we can start a new war soon. Against Iran maybe.

  182. The Department of Homeland Insecurity by HiroProX · · Score: 1

    I love a good double meaning.

  183. Minor nitpick. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    I always thought the "Ministry of Truth" had a nice uber-authoritarian ring to it.

    Minitstry of Truth was first used in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. JMS openly admitted borrowing the concept because he wanted people to instantly understand that the ministry was a farce.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  184. "Homeland"? ... "Security"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been in the military and vendor contractor side of the business for so long that "homeland" is a non sequitur. Duffel bag, cot, MRE's, and an Internet connection - that's "home" enough for me. "Land" is definitely non-sensical if the bunk is moving at sea or if I'm strapped into a jump seat on a C-17 ... DHS has always been more of a mangler of mgmt reports and budgets, so "security" is also a non sequitur if you really needed a sitrep yesterday.

    I always thought it might be nice to have a "Department of Don't Know". DDK is more honest. Basically, if a President turns to a Secretary of Defense with a question about troop readiness in Uganda, and gets the "I Don't Know" look, someone gets to text the DDK Office the question to get an estimate on how long and how expensive it might be to get an answer.

    If FEMA doesn't know if it has the Congressional funding to fix up Mineral, VA, well then, send a text message to DDK and see how much and how long those good citizens have to wait before FEMA can kick Eric Cantor's butt before FEMA can sign over a check to fix those Virginia public works and homes wrecked by that surprise 5.8 magnitude quake in August 2011.

    If Defense doesn't know how to secure the Mexican border, then text DDK the question, and see how much and how long it might take to set up traffic cameras along the border and post border guards to hand out tickets for visiting the US illegally. Imagine trying to sneak into the US with a parking boot locked on your front axle. Now imagine the same thing tied to your leg.

    Just think of DDK as WolframAlpha.com tweaked to understand Washington-speak.

    Sometimes the "right" answers begin with the "wrong" questions.

  185. Help Rename the Department of Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CONTROL Oops! been done 45 years ago. Sorry about that Chief...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get_Smart

  186. So many choices! by S3D · · Score: 1

    If you want emphasize uncompromising efficiency go for Cheka To point out massive participation and instill fear in the enemy use NKVD For respectability and all-encompassing permeability use KGB

  187. Department of Citizen Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The truth is always easier to remember

  188. Unconstitutional by markofkane · · Score: 1

    I think Gestapo is appropriate. It seems like we are all suspects, and must prove we not carrying weapons. "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Ben Franklin.

  189. Bureau of Applied Stalinism by Ramin_HAL9001 · · Score: 1

    Bureau of Applied Stalinism
    Or how about:
    American
    Stalinist
    Security for
    Managing
    Unpatriotic
    National
    Citizenry in the
    Homeland

  190. what about Motherland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least it sill be a bit more politically correct!

  191. Don't rename, just reinterprete. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Department - the act of departing, leaving, going away.
    Department of homeland security - the office responsible for making all the homeland security to depart.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  192. Let's rename Slashdot instead by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Slashdot: News for Paranoid Cynics

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  193. S-H-I-T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Security of Homeland Intelligence from Threats.

    V

  194. Rename DHS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Gestapo?