Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Open Source Tax Software?

An anonymous reader writes "I finally started looking at my taxes and instead of handing over my personal information and money to TurboTax I was wondering if there were any recommendations for freely available/open source tax software? Ideally, the data would be stored in a portable, open format. I wouldn't really need a GUI, but something that filled out PDF forms would be nice." It's a question that just won't go away. Open source solution or not, if you're a U.S. taxpayer, the deadline for filing is nearly to hand.

387 comments

  1. For this you want a professional product by CoderExpert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, this is the kind of product that is done with help of lawyers and accountants, because it is really complicated. Specialists rarely work for free with open source products. You really don't want some 18 year open source coder's "product" (who just filed his taxes for the first time and quickly coded up something) for this. They just don't understand all the different tax laws and practices, especially in some corner cases. And it is YOU who will be responsible when the program gets it wrong. Using open source instead of a program made by professionals with the help of accountants and tax professionals is incredibly stupid!

    1. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      FUD. Thanks for wasting everyone's time with a useless reply like this.

    2. Re:For this you want a professional product by dmacleod808 · · Score: 1

      My fiance has an investment account. She had pages and pages of buys and sells that had to be recorded. Turbotax has an interface that imports the data directly from the brokerage firm, the same forms that were mailed to her. It was incredibly quick.

      --
      There Can Be Only One...
    3. Re:For this you want a professional product by alen · · Score: 5, Informative

      no, the reason turbo tax costs money is they have teams of accountants translate new tax laws in every state into easy to fill out forms and the math functions behind them

    4. Re:For this you want a professional product by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. There are a few things that spending just a little money can get the job done quickly and efficiently. The last time I checked, at-home software ranged in price from 30-100 dollars. You have to file taxes = you have some kind of income or other type of money changing hands somewhere. SO, you can't spare $30 to ensure that something which can send you to jail is done correctly?

    5. Re:For this you want a professional product by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, TurboTax's online tool is free if you make under $31,000 (about $14.90/hr at full time). My girlfriend did it that way - it's called Freedom Edition or something.

    6. Re:For this you want a professional product by Tyr07 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually it was a good reply and worth taking note.

      Just because 'hurr hurr derpa no free software that does all my taxes for me' isn't what you were hoping for doesn't make it useless.

      They were correct. This is highly specialized software for a specific purpose operated based on state/country/province etc.
      It's not something I recommend trying to cheap out on without doing the work when it comes to the government.

      Keep in mind, the question basically asks 'Is there a way, I can stop paying someone else to do my taxes, and do my taxes myself, without paying anyone, but not have to do my taxes myself, and have free software do it for me'

      That's like me saying, 'Is there free software that does my job for me but doesn't cost me anything and I still get paid for working'
      Now, it may sound sarcastic, but if that software existed, I'd definitely be using it.

      To sum it up, specializing in government revenue regulations is something unlikely to find for free that does everything related to them for you.
      There's open source software like, calculators available. Even free spreadsheet software. That's all tech, which makes sense to find open source.

    7. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For complex returns, that may be correct. But there's no reason there can't be an open source product with consists of nothing more than an electronic version of the forms which allows you to type rather than print and which automatically does the math (on the forms) for you. Then it either prints or electronically submits the return. It's no different from picking up the paper forms and filling them out yourself. You're responsible for selecting the correct forms, knowing which laws apply, etc.

    8. Re:For this you want a professional product by autocannon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, go use some free open source "stuff" to file your taxes. Hope it works, hope it's accurate. Oh, and hope they update it multiple times every god damn year to keep up to date with the ever changing tax code. But hey, it's free right. Why would anyone want to actually support software developers by "paying" for software.

      Seriously, what is the obsession here with people wanting everything for free? You want to do your taxes for free, sit down with the paper form and do them. If Turbotax is too expensive for you, try TaxAct. It was $20 to efile both state and federal this year.

    9. Re:For this you want a professional product by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      As a great fan of open source and community-based development, I have to sadly hang my head and agree.

      I have some investments that, due to their particular details, have stumped multiple tax preparers. The (professional) software I've looked at doesn't even support this particular item, so I have little hope for my beloved open source. Even if there was a community-developed tax program, I personally wouldn't trust its accuracy over time. Yes, I could go through myself and verify that all of the year's changes to the tax laws were made to the code base, but I don't have the time for that. The commercial software often has some kind of guarantee of accuracy, where if they screwed it up, they'll at least help set things right with the IRS afterward.

      Now, if there was a community-based organization offering such a guarantee, and asking for donations to support it, and employing the lawyers and accountants to verify it, I'd be all in favor... I simply don't know of any such entity, though.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    10. Re:For this you want a professional product by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      H&R block offers free online filing if your income is less than 57k and it's a simple return (i can't remember the exact qualifications, i think you had to be taking standard deduction but i'm not sure)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    11. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total agree 75% of people looking for open source software just want to get everything for free. Prehaps you could just go open source on your paycheck as well.

    12. Re:For this you want a professional product by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Tax rules and tax law are the epitome of the "hard and boring functionality that no one wants to write, because its not cool, not visible, and definitely not shiny" that plague all projects, both open source and closed source. Tax rules and laws also have nuances that really need to be understood in order to translate correctly into code - again, something really boring and hard that needs to be done.

    13. Re:For this you want a professional product by pluther · · Score: 1
      The IRS provides this one already. It's not open source, but if you make under a certain amount, click their "free e-file" link, and it will lead to you exactly the pdf forms you describe.

      At least it did last year. I assume it's still there, but I haven't started my taxes yet this year...

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    14. Re:For this you want a professional product by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... wasn't free for me back in 2009 (when I had only unemployment income). The U.S. return was free but not state and local.

      Oh and I choose open source because it's cheap and easy to get (versus MS Office or Photoshop). But so too is TurboTax, so no reason to try an alternative.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    15. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It didn't take long for that 18 year old coder to respond.

    16. Re:For this you want a professional product by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      That and I would always be wary of any tax softwre not backed up with warranty on its accuracy no matter if it's FOSS or not. You don't want some subtle bug to cause an audit to hit you and then you find out that your software's developer disclaims all liability. Besides most tax companies offer pretty comprehensive editions for free for the average tax filer.

    17. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fundamentally, tax software is a tool which you use to outsource understanding the tax code. The fundamental problem with OSS tax software is that the people who understand it expect to get paid for their understanding. In the OSS lane, it would make sense as a government-funded project. However, there's a horrible conflict of interest there. If the tax code were substantially simpler, but again, the US Government is "very bad" at developing software.

    18. Re:For this you want a professional product by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually it was a good reply and worth taking note.

      Just because 'hurr hurr derpa no free software that does all my taxes for me' isn't what you were hoping for doesn't make it useless.

      They were correct. This is highly specialized software for a specific purpose operated based on state/country/province etc.>

      This is true but no one has yet mentioned that there IS a free (as in beer) way to do your taxes: obtain the necessary (freely available) forms, read them, understand them, and complete them. There is even phone based help if you have specific questions, as well as many books available at your local library. There, your tax forms just got filed without spending a dime! If you don't want to invest this time or don't want to take the risk of doing them incorrectly, then supposing that a free option would be satisfactory is kind of laughable. It's like (oh yes, we do love our similes) wanting seat belts in your car (oh yes, we do love our CAR similes) but not wanting to pay for them, and still wanting them to be just as safe. Surely, by now someone made something that was just as safe but was also free, right?

    19. Re:For this you want a professional product by sconeu · · Score: 2

      It's a 1040 EZ. The whole point of the EZ form is that ANYONE could do it.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    20. Re:For this you want a professional product by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      No, stamps are much more than a dime these days...

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    21. Re:For this you want a professional product by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, and hope they update it multiple times every god damn year to keep up to date with the ever changing tax code.

      I think you've identified the real problem. It's not that there is no open source tax software, it's that your tax system is so complex that it requires software to file the return.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:For this you want a professional product by Joiseybill · · Score: 2

      @sjhillman .. "freedom edition" +1 informative
      @AC "FUD" -1 NOT
      @Loughlia " ...can send you to jail" .. You do realize it is much more likely that you'll just get an interest-bearing permanent debt.
                  The IRS and Student Loan providers will work backwards from your Social Security death benefit of $300-ish if they have to. Only in rare cases, where the headlines serve a purpose more than the recovery of the money, - or if there is malice or fraud, does someone actually get jailed on taxes.

      and .. the IRS will help with your taxes, also for free.
          http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=202121,00.html .. and the IRS offers links to other "free" filing services, this one works for income up to $57k.

      "free" = at no additional costs to the taxes you already presumed to be paying
      ---
      If OP just wanted to fill in forms on a PDF manually - there are dozens of products, including tediously creating a text box in Open Office for each line and item. In fact, the IRS already makes the PDF forms fillable: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040.pdf
        Actually doing the calculations is where the liability and problems come in.

      In my limited experience, making a calculation error or omission on a return set off a chain of events;
      first, they re-calculate your taxes and settle up on their terms; then you are a whole lot more likely to be audited for the next 3-4 years.

    23. Re:For this you want a professional product by pla · · Score: 2

      Seriously, this is the kind of product that is done with help of lawyers and accountants, because it is really complicated.

      BS. I have a 9-to-5, have a mortgage, play in the stock market, do contracting on the side, and do my own taxes. And I'd say I've just described more than what 90% of US taxpayers need to file. And seriously? Mind-numbingly easy. Painfully easy. Embarrassing-that-professionals-do-that-for-a-living easy.

      Doing ones own taxes involves nothing harder than "add up all the box 2s on your W2s and box 4s on your 1099s and enter that total on line 62 of your 1040". Totally mechanical crap that doesn't require the least bit of thought or familiarity with tax law. When it comes to deductions, you just ask yourself the four or five applicable "nope, can't take that" questions, and throw away those that fail. Only the IRS's annoying insistence on rearranging the damned forms every year makes automating all that crap non-trivial.

      Hell, it annoys me that most of us even need to file, since the IRS already knows everything we tell them. We should only need to file a Schedule A come April, and even that only if we wouldn't have otherwise taken the standard deduction. By the end of May, they could just send us a bill or a check, or rarely, a request for more information. Done.

      Yes, if you run an S-Corp with substantial foreign assets, you'll probably want to talk to a expert. For the rest of us, don't try to make this sound harder than the reality. Plug and frickin' chug, baby!

    24. Re:For this you want a professional product by Joiseybill · · Score: 2

      Edit: "this one works for filing up to $57K" : http://www.irs.gov/efile/index.html
          sorry~!

    25. Re:For this you want a professional product by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Informative

      For complex returns, that may be correct. But there's no reason there can't be an open source product with consists of nothing more than an electronic version of the forms which allows you to type rather than print and which automatically does the math (on the forms) for you. Then it either prints or electronically submits the return. It's no different from picking up the paper forms and filling them out yourself. You're responsible for selecting the correct forms, knowing which laws apply, etc.

      As amazing as this seems, the IRS (and many state and muni tax agencies) have in fact figured out how to produce a form-style PDF that can be filled in ENTIRELY electronically. The IRS does make you do the math yourself, but I am sure you can find an open source calculator to help with that, right? Many state and munis seem to do this better, with forms that run all the math for you and can be submitted electronically. And believe it or not they even make them easy to find via Google. The wonder of it all!

    26. Re:For this you want a professional product by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      acting like everyone needs a tax lawyer and accountant is skipping the fact that the people who want the software are by definition very interested and capable of doing it themselves.

      way to distract with a strawman, though.

    27. Re:For this you want a professional product by pla · · Score: 1

      Doesn't her broker offer downloads of an automagically filled-in form 8949 (nee Schedule D1), no fuss no muss?

      If not - She need a new broker. You don't need TurboTax to fill in what amounts to a simple spreadsheet with a one-line summary.

    28. Re:For this you want a professional product by sribe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everything you said PLUS tax software must conform to an extremely rigid release schedule, where neither dates nor functionality are negotiable at all, which is not something I've ever seen from open source.

    29. Re:For this you want a professional product by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I run into incredibly unusual and arcane investments in my line of work, yet my clients don't seem to have any problems that haven't been tackled before. What are you investing in that multiple tax preparers cannot figure out?

    30. Re:For this you want a professional product by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

      Man, poor people get all the breaks.

    31. Re:For this you want a professional product by citab · · Score: 1

      good job picking a mate with financial sense .... could she loan me a few bucks to pay my taxes?

    32. Re:For this you want a professional product by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I think 1040EZ is up to $100k individual or combined this year.

    33. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, it's not enough that the tax code is forever changing. The fun part is that Congress doesn't even bother finishing writing the stuff until late January of The Year After you had to do all of your tax planning. And then software development has all of .5 months to finalize and test those last second changes before filing season. Don't forget setting aside a secret 13th month before Feburary to go through e-file certification on Federal and every damn state + a few very special counties! Some are XML, most are some kind of Cobol, few agree on what is even allowed in a friggin postal address.

    34. Re:For this you want a professional product by dalias · · Score: 2

      Actually, the IRS translates the tax laws into forms, schedules, and the (albeit written in a backwards, ugly procedural form) math formulas behind them. If you download and read the instruction PDFs for the forms you need, it's pretty direct and mindless to follow the steps and fill in the numbers...

    35. Re:For this you want a professional product by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the filing is free but there may still be a fee from H&R block to get a deposit.

      So they're charging money for a free service. Love it, huh.

    36. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of which detracts from the usefulness of a single app which combines everything and does all of the basics.

    37. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "TurboTax's online tool is free"

      The Federal Government covers the cost by giving Turbo Tax/etc ~$40 for every covered person. This is why only the federal form is free.

      Unless they changed something, it's not "make" under $31k, but have a taxable income of under $31k. I make quite a bit more than that, yet I don't pay because my taxable income is around $13k. Standard deduction + 401k + Rent + Flex plan = really low taxable income.

    38. Re:For this you want a professional product by Sir_Sri · · Score: 0

      He's right. In an idealistic world this is the sort of software the government should be producing themselves, so at the very least if it's done wrong there is clearly someone at fault.

      But free, or open source isn't going to attract a lot of people. And how do you resolve conflicts? What if they're resolved wrong, and those interpretations of rules translate into real losses/gains for users? Tax software is mess, because tax codes are a mess, if you understand these things you are paid very handsomly to understand them, and turning around and giving away that information for free is shooting yourself, and everyone else in your profession in the foot. Tax codes are also updated yearly. That means there is a huge retention cycle and lead in period where things have to be implemented.

      I wouldn't trust an open development model, because if it's not done, what do you do about it? What if something isn't done, done properly, and, importantly, done on time? It's the sort of thing that requires a firm management hand. The serious open source projects (think linux) work because a huge portion of the 'contributors' are paid professionals who have management behind them, they're just going to monetize something else. But what else is there to monetize in tax software? If there isn't something to monetize other than the software itself, and that software has to meet legal requirements, and deadlines, don't expect an open model to work all that well.

    39. Re:For this you want a professional product by arcsimm · · Score: 1

      Haha, not if you're a poor self-employed person! Go straight to the long form, do not pass go, do not collect a refund! Pardon me while I go cry in the corner.

    40. Re:For this you want a professional product by quixote9 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seconding TaxAct. Cheapest and best. Does not phone home, as far as I know. It's the only reason I still have to have a virtualbox Windows taking up space on my drive.

      I've been looking for a reliable, complete FOSS alternative for years. I think, as others have said, it doesn't exist because nobody (me included if I knew how!) would do that kind of tedium for free.

    41. Re:For this you want a professional product by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First, it’s not Turbo Tax which is lobbing for this stuff. They don’t have too. There is enough lobbyist pushing their special interest and crack pot positions searching for short term gain that they don’t need to spend the money – it’s done for them.

      Second, It’s not that it’s technically difficult; it’s the Certification and fast turn around time.

      It’s not like a word processor in which you can start off with the basic stuff and add stuff later. Nor is it static like a word processor – each year the IRS tweaks stuff. You kind of need the whole package up and running – perfectly - by February 1st.

      At least they make the on-line software free for the easy, low income, returns.

      That being said, I would like the IRS to come out with some basic tax forms which do the calculations and look up by itself. i.e., you would still need input the numbers, but the simple “multiple by 28%” and “Look up income in tax table” would be automated.

      Or even better, tax simplification. Less work spent on make work, fewer loop holes to abuse.

    42. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You realize there's more to many peoples' taxes than the single 1040-EZ you have to file... right?

      If you think that you can simply "follow the steps" like it's a mad libs, then you're either overpaying (in which case, thanks) or underpaying (in which case, pay up) on your taxes.

      But then, it's always been the case that those who know the least grossly overestimate their ability and competence.

    43. Re:For this you want a professional product by mcavic · · Score: 2

      It's not mindless. It's a lot of arithmetic, and a lot of questions to ask the user. Also, IRS's regulations and instructions aren't written in a way that most people are used to reading.

      Yes, I could do my taxes on paper if I had to, but that doesn't mean I can write software to do your taxes.

    44. Re:For this you want a professional product by CoderExpert · · Score: 2

      What BS? I was talking about making tax software, not filing your own taxes. When you're making tax software it needs to account for all possible scenarios, and it needs to be kept up to date.

    45. Re:For this you want a professional product by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, since the government defines the taxes, in the interest of its citizens the government should also provide a no frills open source (BSD or such) implementation of the tax code... Third parties could then build better interfaces (facilities to import from other sources etc) on that, while knowing that the base code complies with all the applicable rules and submits the requires end data to the IRS.

      For the government to set arbitrarily complex tax rules, and then force you to pay third party suppliers to clean up the mess it forces on you is wrong.

      Everyone should have a free, government supplied and transparent way of completing their taxes.

      Personally i wouldn't trust a closed source package at all, since i cannot verify what its doing.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    46. Re:For this you want a professional product by rssrss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a lawyer. I used to do my taxes myself without purchasing a tax program. I wrote a spreadsheet to do the calculations, because doing them by hand was tedious, complicated, and error prone.

      One year in the 1990s I did my taxes using my own spreadsheet. A few months later, I received a letter from the IRS explaining that I had miscalculated my taxes, that they had recalculated them, and they were enclosing a check payable to me for the $1,100 that I had overpaid.

      In that moment I realized that I could no longer rely on my own efforts and understanding to complete my tax returns. If I had left $1,100 on the table, I had probably left more than the IRS would tell me about.

      After that, I started to use tax programs. I use H&R Block At Home, but I am sure that Turbo Tax is also useful. At any rate they are a lot cheaper than paying too much taxes.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    47. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no, the reason turbo tax costs money is they have teams of accountants translate new tax laws in every state into easy to fill out forms and the math functions behind them

      Don't forget about lobbying by Intuit:

      Why Can’t the I.R.S. Help Fill in the Blanks?

      http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/business/24digi.html?_r=1

      http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000026667

    48. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LINUX-futures!!! hahahahahaha I kid I kid (not really)

    49. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What gets me is the IRS will mail me back if it is wrong because it doesnt match their numbers they have got.

      So not only do I fill the form out they do as well and then compare results...

      Why cant we have like an 80% solution where 80% of the forms are already filled out and ready to go at some point in time? Then people can request changes to it? They know the deductions, they have the data. Why are we filling it out?

    50. Re:For this you want a professional product by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      In most other countries, people with typical (ie 9-5 job, accounts with major institutions, mortgage on one property etc) finances don't need to file taxes, it's all done for them automatically and appropriate taxes are deducted directly from income sources.
      It's only people with especially complex finances who fill out tax returns.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    51. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Open Source, for the most part, is professional.
      2. Someone who has been coding for 18 years is more experienced that most of the "pro-coders" who work for companies selling product.
      3. Apparently you assume that people who write software that makes the internet work, the worlds stock exchanges work, and the nuclear bomb factories work, isn't able to do the math for taxes. That's your assumption, and I might say, its a really stupid, stupid stupid assumption.
      4. You assume the people vetting Open Source software *aren't* lawyers or accountants. Another stupid stupid stupid assumption.
      5. Seriously, your assumptions are baseless, without merit, and the work of a moron. Building a nuclear bomb, designing the wing of a aircraft, or building a really efficient, powerful computer operating system are *ALL* more complicated that fucking tax software, yet you blow as hard as you can. IDIOT!
      6. I *have* used open source software for taxes. Knowing that the code is vetted, I can trust it. I can see the code for myself. I can confirm, for myself, that it works correctly. I have several university degrees in the sciences too (electrical engineering, computer science). Apparently there was something to do with math in there somewhere. Nowhere in any tax forms I have ever seen, did I see Laplace transforms, Navier-Stokes algorithms, Eigenvectors, ring homomorphisms or Lorentzian manifolds. It was just all arithmetic. The logic never got more complicated than modus ponens and modus tolens. I will continue to use Open Source software and finish my taxes this year (as in previous years), and will still get the *maximum* back from the government (just like last year and the year before). Oh, by the way, my brother in law is a corporate tax accountant. Last year he offered to look over my taxes, and there were a few things he would have missed that the software got, and he makes a 6 digit salary. So There!

    52. Re:For this you want a professional product by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Year after year, the IRS has proven in independent tests to be incompetent at understanding their own rules. Only a fool would allow the IRS to "help" them with their return.

      Besides, if you use some third-party product, you have some liability protection. If you use the IRS, you don't.

    53. Re:For this you want a professional product by pla · · Score: 2

      The IRS does make you do the math yourself, but I am sure you can find an open source calculator to help with that, right?

      Year after year, the IRS lists simple math errors (including transposition errors) as the single most common problem they encounter with returns.

      Given that PDFs can have semi-active content (Hell, they support full-blown Javascript) for input validation, why not USE that feature to reduce their most common problem?

      Going further, why not include all the common tax forms in one file, so it can update fields between those forms as you go, and exclude the blank ones at print-time? So far, talking about nothing more complex than one-line triggers on a few key fields. Bam, enter a half-dozen numbers in the right places, and hit "print". Total prep time, 30 seconds.

      You might well ask, then, why they can't add a simple wizard to semi-intelligently ask for those half-dozen numbers - But to answer that will cost you $40, payable to Intuit.

    54. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typically they seem to do the federal for free and charge for state.

    55. Re:For this you want a professional product by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Taxes are withheld from your income. But there are also a myriad of deductions and adjustments that can be applied that make it more complex.

    56. Re:For this you want a professional product by Americano · · Score: 2

      Actually, he said "this type of product" is created with the oversight of tax lawyers and accountants. And he's right - because writing software to calculate all of the arcane nuances of tax stuff is something that requires fairly detailed knowledge of the tax code, and how it works.

      There's a difference between "everybody needs a tax lawyer and an accountant, no matter how simple their particular return may be," and "writing generalized software that implements (correctly) the interacting tax codes of 50 states plus the federal government, and covers all of the non-standard, rare, and strange situations that can arise for small numbers of people requires specialized knowledge that a tax lawyer and/or accountant needs to provide."

      There's already free, and easily available tools for e-filing a simple 1040 EZ and many state tax forms. Presumably, the poster has a more complex tax situation - and in that case, he'd be a fool to not want a product that was created with feedback and insight provided by tax experts.

      But yeah, your strawman was pretty nice too.

      Also: people who want the software are by definition very much NOT interested in doing it themselves, they are specifically seeking to outsource their need to understand the tax code to someone else who has figured out how to add, subtract, multiply and divide all of the right fields in the right order to get the right number at the end. The people asking for software may be *capable* of doing it themselves, but they are most explicitly not *interested* in doing it themselves if they're looking to outsource the job to someone else's software.

    57. Re:For this you want a professional product by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      That being said, I would like the IRS to come out with some basic tax forms which do the calculations and look up by itself. i.e., you would still need input the numbers, but the simple “multiple by 28%” and “Look up income in tax table” would be automated.

      I think the IRS has something like that, but not many people use it because it's only setup for just basic taxes (and didn't handle state taxes).

      A lot of it comes down to time and trust. Doing it by hand is time consuming; time that could be spent on more valuable things. Also, non-e-filed returns take longer to get their refunds (I e-filed and got one of my refunds a week after filing).

    58. Re:For this you want a professional product by Brannoncyll · · Score: 2

      I've had to do my taxes by hand for the past 2 years because I am a non-resident alien, which most software is unable to handle. Isn't it nice that they give the hardest job to the people who know the least about the tax system in this country?

      Although most of the work is straightforward, there is a lot of terminology that has to be learned. For example, your residency status at the federal level is determined differently at state level, so you have to go trawling through the 70 page 'how to fill in' documents to find out which you are. For the deductions and exemptions I probably understand only half of what they mean. For example, one of the NY state exemptions is for 'Refund of QEZE credit for real property taxes'. Real property taxes? As opposed to imaginary property taxes? There's one called 'cost depletion' - what on Earth does that mean? The net result is that I probably know more about tax than a lot of American citizens!

    59. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup! Been using TaxAct for 6 years now. Federal return only was $9.95 with direct deposit of my refund. Hard to really complain about $10 when they have all my previous years data and it took me only 15 minutes total to do my return.

    60. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The typical H&R drone can't figure out how to do taxes for investments in foreign corporations where no profit or revenue has been generated or investments in certain offshore Forex options...been my experience too.

    61. Re:For this you want a professional product by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Where can you deduct rent?

    62. Re:For this you want a professional product by pla · · Score: 2

      What BS? I was talking about making tax software, not filing your own taxes. When you're making tax software it needs to account for all possible scenarios, and it needs to be kept up to date.

      Except, you don't need to handle everything - You just need to know the program's limitations, state the big ones up front, and alert the user when they run into one of the less common ones.

      I suppose this may count as a matter of interpretation, but I didn't take the FP's question to mean "why can't IBM file its taxes in 46 countries using free software", but rather as "why does the typical American have to pay the Intuit tax just to stay legal?"

    63. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "TurboTax's online tool is free" The Federal Government covers the cost by giving Turbo Tax/etc ~$40 for every covered person. This is why only the federal form is free.

      Citation?

    64. Re:For this you want a professional product by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Bam, enter a half-dozen numbers in the right places, and hit "print". Total prep time, 30 seconds.
      You might well ask, then, why they can't add a simple wizard to semi-intelligently ask for those half-dozen numbers - But to answer that will cost you $40, payable to Intuit.

      If you have only six tax-related figures to input and you aren't filing the 1040 EZ form (free to do on TaxAct, Turbotax, HRblock, and others) then you already messed up. Go back to the start and try again.

    65. Re:For this you want a professional product by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      It's also worth mentioning the help you'll receive from a professional, commercial product if you get audited. I don't think the open source community is the first place I'd look for tax law help, much as I love em.

    66. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, developing software to handle taxes would be *boring*. Open source software programs will struggle unless they are fun and challenging to code (or are backed financially).

    67. Re:For this you want a professional product by The+Flymaster · · Score: 1

      Massachusetts.

    68. Re:For this you want a professional product by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      You can always file electronically right from the IRS site: http://www.irs.gov/efile/

      For me, it's SO worth the extra 20 bucks or so to just have everything done online through a browser-driven tax software. As far as Taxact having my data.... well, they've had it the last 5 years running and I can access it anytime I want to (mortgage info, daycare stuff, SSNs for my kids, etc). Sure, I have all that stuff in my safe, but I can just log in and snag a couple of PDFs no matter where I am. Since I have to provide this info to banks every time I make a mega-major purchase, anyway, I really don't care if Taxact has it too. At least I can access the whole dataset at will.

    69. Re:For this you want a professional product by alen · · Score: 2

      except i don't want to fill out any forms. turbo tax takes the info i type in and makes up completed forms automatically. very nice when your tax returns are 50 to 100 pages like mine

    70. Re:For this you want a professional product by jimicus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think it's so much that as the principle of the thing.

      By demanding you file your tax online yet not providing a half-sane product to do this free of charge, the ability to file a tax return is itself subject to another charge that you can't easily avoid. Effectively, another tax.

      We have something similar in the UK - companies are legally obliged to file their tax returns online by submitting a file in a particular format. The format itself is open and based on XML, but pretty much the only things that support it are commercial applications aimed at the accounting industry. Which means you are forced to pay an accountant even if your affairs are simple enough you could easily fill in the forms yourself.

      IIRC they may also have a form online you can fill in. Haven't checked lately...

    71. Re:For this you want a professional product by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 2

      TaxAct is also pretty transparent. My girl uses HR Block's deal, and it blows in comparison, and cost her almost $100 to use. TaxAct also lets me print the actual forms that would are submitted to the IRS, and it's cake to use since it stores last years tax info AND outlines what's different from last year. Been using it for 5 years now and hope it stays cheap and accurate.

    72. Re:For this you want a professional product by mortonda · · Score: 1

      It's not something I recommend trying to cheap out on without doing the work when it comes to the government.

      As a married, self employed consultant, I hire a CPA to do all the work for me. Looking at the huge stack of papers he sends back with the filing, the time I would otherwise spend trying to mimic that... is priceless. Well worth the few hundred $$ to have him do it.

    73. Re:For this you want a professional product by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have some investments that, due to their particular details, have stumped multiple tax preparers.

      They never tell you this part of being a drug runner, do they? No, it's all "see the world" and "make people happy!". Sigh.

    74. Re:For this you want a professional product by pla · · Score: 1

      If you have only six tax-related figures to input and you aren't filing the 1040 EZ form (free to do on TaxAct, Turbotax, HRblock, and others) then you already messed up. Go back to the start and try again.

      Excluding the details of my actual trade-log (which I download as an already-done 8959 from my broker and it distills down to two numbers on a Schedule D), I literally only had to provide eight me-specific numbers to fill in my 1040 and schedules SE, A, C, D, and SE. I technically had to enter two more (that had really, really obvious default values) on my 5405 just because the IRS insists you go through a bizarre set of steps to end up at the amount of "$500" that I knew before even looking at the form.

      I then had to add, subtract, multiply, compare, and look-up those values over and over and over to arrive at the big "I get back this much" number. Funny, but computers add, subtract, multiply, compare, and look-up very, very well. Better than humans, even.


      So you can now choose to save face by calling my trade log "dozens of inputs" rather than two. My main point still stands, though - 99% of the work could happen automatically as a cascade of calculations, with zero math or transcription errors in the final result.

    75. Re:For this you want a professional product by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      If Turbotax is too expensive for you, try TaxAct. It was $20 to efile both state and federal this year.

      Taxact is free if you use their online version, and you get free federal e-filing too.
      It even calculates your state payment/refund, but you have to pay if you want to print the forms or e-file.

      I normally purchase their $20 deluxe+state version that you install, but opted for the free one this year.
      I was impressed at how well the web-based online version mimicked the PC version.
      Sure, it's not open source, but it's free and works great.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    76. Re:For this you want a professional product by Joiseybill · · Score: 5, Insightful


      BS. I have a 9-to-5, have a mortgage, play in the stock market, do contracting on the side, and do my own taxes. And I'd say I've just described more than what 90% of US taxpayers need to file. And seriously? Mind-numbingly easy. Painfully easy. Embarrassing-that-professionals-do-that-for-a-living easy. ...
      Doing ones own taxes involves nothing harder than "add up all the box 2s on your W2s and box 4s on your 1099s and enter that total on line 62 of your 1040". Totally mechanical crap that doesn't require the least bit of thought or familiarity with tax law. ... ...
      For the rest of us, don't try to make this sound harder than the reality. Plug and frickin' chug, baby!

      @pla: +1 because you are a 1%-er. ( intended as a wake up; I can't afford the 1% moniker, maybe I'm in the top 10)
          Sure, for the /. audience, the "algorithm" of following the instructions, including branches.. plugging & chugging when we fill in variables, and making an informed decision on deductibles - is all likely within our grasp.

      However, look around at the rest of the country.
      Most Americans cannot balance a checkbook [1], [2].

      The basic tax guide "Publication 17" is over 300 pages long. [3]
      The instructions for the basic 1040 form is at 100 pages [4].

      Just answering the questions "What's New?", "Do I have to file", and "Where do I file" ( [4] pages 6-7) incorporate 4 more pages of tables and worksheets referenced in the text ( pp 8-11), and suggest the taxpayer review 10 separate publications for clarifications, outside the 'core' paperwork of Pub 17 and 1040 instructions.
        point: it is complex, even to "just follow the instructions". Not everyone is the sort who just jumps in, presses ON, and only looks for manuals after it doesn't work. ( I am.. but not everyone is.)

      If you are lucky enough to have a job, and a mortgage, play in the stock market, and do contracting on the side.. you are a pretty smart and fairly motivated person. You can multitask. You can prioritize tasks, and see projects through to the finish.
      Only 58% of the US population is employed.. or 42% is not. [5] - BLS report " population/employment ratio" .. when it comes to the word "unemployed", the US Govt needs to take a lesson from Inigo Montoya, “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means”

      Never mind making educated decisions about deductions like work expenses and medical costs. I don't think the average American could fill out the typical medical insurance claim form, never mind read one and extract information for tax purposes.

      How many Americans - picked "at random" - would you trust to balance your checkbook, or to fill out your tax forms?
      Heck, I don't even trust a "jury of my peers" to render a sensible verdict.
      Most folks I have met can't follow a 2 -page recipe in a cookbook, or remember the plot to a 200-page novel unless the movie and/or starred Heath Ledger or Megan Fox.

      If every citizen was encouraged to do their own taxes, imagine how much WE taxpayers would be paying to clean that mess up?
      Don't give people more credit than they deserve. Look at our last few elections.

    77. Re:For this you want a professional product by clodney · · Score: 1

      For the government to set arbitrarily complex tax rules, and then force you to pay third party suppliers to clean up the mess it forces on you is wrong.

      Everyone should have a free, government supplied and transparent way of completing their taxes.

      Everyone does have a free, government supplied way of doing their taxes - paper tax forms and the instruction book. I did my taxes that way for years, and millions of people still do. For most people it isn't even that hard.

    78. Re:For this you want a professional product by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Another vote for TaxAct here - although I don't pay for any of their extra services, just the $9.95 a year to use their online system and e-file.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    79. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can deduct rent on your federal return?

    80. Re:For this you want a professional product by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I think "real property" is like "real estate" - you know, land and buildings.

      Rules like that aren't that hard most of the time. "At the state level, I can exempt income I received that was a refund of a QEZE credit for real property taxes? Do I own any real estate? No? Skip that. Did I pay or receive a QEZE credit, or even know what a QEZE credit is? No? Skip that. Do I remember getting a refund check from any state or local government in the past year that wasn't from the previous year's taxes? No? Skip that."

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    81. Re:For this you want a professional product by muindaur · · Score: 1

      It's the 1040-EZ, but it's very limited use.

      http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040ez.pdf

    82. Re:For this you want a professional product by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      IANAA, but I believe real property refers to real estate and large physical items of over $5000 or so in value, while almost everything else is called 'chattel' - things you could pick up and carry around on your person. It's a holdover from the English common law system.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    83. Re:For this you want a professional product by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      For the government to set arbitrarily complex tax rules, and then force you to pay third party suppliers to clean up the mess it forces on you is wrong.

      Hey, if it's good enough for the judicial system, it's good enough for the tax system, damn it!

    84. Re:For this you want a professional product by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I used to do my own taxes, and I made a similar mistake one year in the early 2000s. Fortunately I caught it myself, but I decided at the time that my taxes had become too complex for me to trust entirely to myself, and I started using preparation software. I still go through everything myself to make sure the software has things approximately accurate - at least to the extent that any differences would require fines and not jail time.

      Since my wife has been self employed, I wrote a spreadsheet that automates schedule AI to calculate my quarterly tax payments. Since I have a full-time job with withholdings that I've cranked up, we don't have to mail quarterly payments every quarter. But I run through schedule AI to the current quarter, calculate how much it says I should have paid already, and mail in a check if there's a difference versus my actual withholdings. At the end of the year I know I'll be close enough (within $1000) on tax owed to tax paid that no penalties will apply, and I don't even have to include my schedule AI with my taxes. The "approximate" part is that I don't bother to use the lower tax rate for capital gains in the schedule AI work, so it should bias me towards overpaying a little bit, which is acceptable enough to me.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    85. Re:For this you want a professional product by pulski · · Score: 1

      I used H&R Block this year and the only charge was to have them do my state filing in addition to my federal. The deposit comes from the IRS, so the only thing they can charge for there is if you want them to pay you an advance on it.

    86. Re:For this you want a professional product by Brannoncyll · · Score: 1

      I think "real property" is like "real estate" - you know, land and buildings.

      Rules like that aren't that hard most of the time. "At the state level, I can exempt income I received that was a refund of a QEZE credit for real property taxes? Do I own any real estate? No? Skip that. Did I pay or receive a QEZE credit, or even know what a QEZE credit is? No? Skip that. Do I remember getting a refund check from any state or local government in the past year that wasn't from the previous year's taxes? No? Skip that."

      This is pretty much the process that I use, although I feel that I might be missing out on a deduction somewhere.

    87. Re:For this you want a professional product by Qzukk · · Score: 2

      I'd say that what turbotax etc is great for is telling you is WHICH forms you have to fill out.

      For a couple of decades I didn't bother with any software and did everything by pencil and copied the result in ink and mailed it in. This meant filling in all the different worksheets and calculations, only to find out that I don't qualify for form 123XYZ or the AMT doesn't apply. This took 4-5 hours.

      I went to turbotax's website the other day and by going step by step and answering the questions I finished my taxes in about 2 hours. It could have been cut down even further by asking more questions up front ("did you sell any stock? No? Then you don't have to worry about half this crap on gains and losses") and then following through on those questions by not making me go through pages of questions about alimony, child support, etc. etc when I told them I was single and had no kids up front.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    88. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The money you spend on tax filling (accountant services or software) is tax deductible. So it is not another tax.

    89. Re:For this you want a professional product by muindaur · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, just look at the Self Employed tax forms you need to file if you run a business: Sole Proprietor, LLC, or Partnership. Those are such a complicated mess that you could easily screw something up. It's the reason there is quick books software to do most of the tracking for you. Lets not forget the taxes you have to pay on employee wages.

      How many people realize that the taxes taken out on the W2s aren't the only income taxes paid?

      Yep, every business that pays wages has to pay taxes on the wages they pay, and it won't ever show up on a paycheck or W2 because they can't take them out of employee pay. Instead they reduce their employees. This is one of the reasons small business owners are pushing for lower taxes, and the reason that lowering taxes WILL improve the job market. It just has to be a reduction on the PAYROLL taxes companies pay. I think there are also penalties for layoffs with FUTA, so they won't risk hiring in an uncertain economy if it will cost them money to let workers go.

      Small business also need to go through EVERY expense they make, and follow the federal depreciation table for assets (can't use your choice of GAAP methods on taxes.) If you use your personal vehicle for taxes, or part of your home (I'm an accounting student so this was even more important to learn since many rural accountants have an office built into their home.), you need to figure out how much of that use was related to business. So you need to calculate the square footage of the office space, then get the percentage that is for the entire house.

      So I completely agree that taxes are not easy to follow.

    90. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try H&R's TaxCut, or whatever it's now called. $15 for federal, at Walmart, Target, and everywhere else! I've been using it for years. It's saved me a bundle!

    91. Re:For this you want a professional product by bws111 · · Score: 1

      No-one said that the math was the hard part. Everyone has said (and you have not refuted in any effective way) that the hard part is understanding the tax code (including all the latest updates) and correctly implementing that as code.

      So what is this great open-source tax software that has been 'vetted' by professional tax experts? Why don't you provide a link to it? Also, I assume that since this unnamed software has been written and vetted by 'professionals' that those developers will stand behind their work like the commercial companies do, and they will pay any penalties incurred as a result of their mistakes.

    92. Re:For this you want a professional product by m3000 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Obama actually campaigned on doing exactly that, but Republicans think it's a tax conspiracy and refuse to do anything useful. ::sigh::

    93. Re:For this you want a professional product by edremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Year after year, the IRS has proven in independent tests to be incompetent at understanding their own rules. Only a fool would allow the IRS to "help" them with their return.

      In all fairness, they aren't the IRS' rules. They are Congress', and the IRS has the thankless task every year of trying to figure them out.

      Back when I was a postdoc living in Canada I kicked a tax question about my return all the way up to the corporate HQ of H&R Block. (My mom has worked for them for ~30 years and called in some favors) The end result? They had no idea. It came down to exactly how you read one incredibly obscure clause in the thousands of pages of US tax code, and if you gave the wording to 100 people 50 of them probably would have picked one interpretation and 50 the other.

      (I picked the one that zeroed out my taxes for the year. I didn't get audited.)

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    94. Re:For this you want a professional product by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Personally, I don't believe in paying more money to file taxes. Plus, e-filing makes the IRS's job much easier. Why should I do that, when I can instead send in paper forms and give them a hard time, and save money in the process?

    95. Re:For this you want a professional product by autocannon · · Score: 1

      The EZ form was free, but I didn't think the A was. Either way, I wanted to efile my state return too, so that required the deluxe and I didn't investigate further. I always have used the web version myself.

      First year I used it I went so far as to enter the values in both TaxAct and TurboTax. Numbers came back within 1 or 2 dollars of each other for calculated return.

    96. Re:For this you want a professional product by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      And the software STILL has bugs for doing even mildly complicated things.

    97. Re:For this you want a professional product by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      After spending more than an hour using H&R block, it told me my taxes were too complicated and I need to talk to a tax professional.

    98. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By demanding you file your tax online yet not providing a half-sane product to do this free of charge, the ability to file a tax return is itself subject to another charge that you can't easily avoid. Effectively, another tax.

      At least in the US, expenses for preparing taxes is deductible and accounted for in the standard deduction.

      IIRC they may also have a form online you can fill in. Haven't checked lately...

      They do (again, US). It has quirks but it has the basics and meets a bare minimum. Otherwise I'm with you, paper submissions are still the canonical format for getting the return to the IRS (where it is digitized anyway). Very slowly the scales are tipping to the opposite, where paper is the exception and not the rule. My experience has been that individual states are much farther ahead (admitedly their job is easier and usually derived from the federal return). As an individual, I've been able to file my state returns all electronically with no mess, pre-computed figures, and refunds (if any) in a few days.

    99. Re:For this you want a professional product by autocannon · · Score: 1

      Who's vetting this mythical software? You see the code yourself and confirm it? How long does that take? Surely at least an hour for a cursory check. What's your time really worth? I know what my time is worth, and 20 dollars to do my taxes without any concerns of accuracy is surely worth it.

      And my brother is the president and ceo of a large corporation, and he makes a 7 digit salary. He totally agrees with me, so there!

    100. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have experience with more than a few brokers, on-line oriented and otherwise. Haven't encountered any that go so far as to send a pre-filled 8949, although they do try to help you out up to their point. I can see ways that providing such could go wrong for the individual, so I always figured they didn't do this for legal reasons to avoid liability. There are online services and most tax software packages will do so happily though.

    101. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you sleep with APK before making this comment?

    102. Re:For this you want a professional product by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      yeah ideally... except...

      The legal system is run to bring business to lawyers
      The tax system is run to bring business to accountants and play favorites...

      The one thing most open source advocates neglect... and you can tell it by this article... is that most of the world is concerned with making a living first.

      That engineers and software programmers are deluded to think they can fight that system.

      Having a simple legal system and simple tax system would be a great job killer for those employed in that professions. Would society as a whole be better off if we did... sure... but you don't promise to make thousands of well organized professionals obsolete and still get elected. You can do that to worthless manufacturing workers and IT workers like us though.

    103. Re:For this you want a professional product by rtobyr · · Score: 1

      This is why I disagree with Richard Stallman, and prefer BSD over GPL. Commercial software is a reality, and it will remain a reality.

    104. Re:For this you want a professional product by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Because mismatches between what you report and what they already know give a good indication that the stuff you reported that they don't know about may be less than accurate/truthful.

    105. Re:For this you want a professional product by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's new this year, but did my 1040 long, Sch A, etc totally free online.
      If you want the link between the "interview" and the actual tax forms you have to pay.
      But the e-filing and getting a PDF of your completed forms is free.

      My state's website has online filing so did that for free too, just by entering a few numbers off the 1040.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    106. Re:For this you want a professional product by wol · · Score: 1

      In the United States, real property refers to land and anything permanently affixed to the land - i.e. house, but not a trailer on wheels. The fun part gets into whether things like partitions or furniture screwed into the wall constitutes "permanently affixed". I've seen arguments over whether ceiling lamps were part of the real property or were detachable.

      --
      If you think deeply enough, you will have no single direction for your outrage.
    107. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At least they make the on-line software free for the easy, low income, returns."

      It's only "free" if you don't mind trusting some shady corp with a lot of details about your finances, and sensitive identifying information (like your social security number).

    108. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there should NEVER be open source projects created to cover a government's a** on the real problem. In fact, software in this area has done more harm than good... by disguising the ridiculous US tax system. If individuals (congress, President) were forced to fill out their own forms you would have tax reforms overnight.

    109. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "TurboTax's online tool is free if you make under $31,000 (about $14.90/hr at full time). My girlfriend did it that way - it's called Freedom Edition or something."

      It should be called Spyware Edition. You're basically trusting some shady corp with details about your finances and with sensitive identifying information (like your social security number).

      I would not touch online tax software with a ten-foot pole, even if they paid me to use it.

      With all the endless stories on Slashdot about identity theft and intrusions in to some of the most prestigious and "secure" companies in the world, you'd think Slashdot users would know better than to trust these corps with their financial info and identity data.

      But, no. All the comments here are about how you should use this crappy, closed-source spyware because it's free.

    110. Re:For this you want a professional product by bhlowe · · Score: 1

      https://taxact.com/ rules. $20 to do state and federal including e-file and automatic tax refund to my bank account. How could a "free" version possibly be better? Jeeze, GET OFF YOUR WALLET.

    111. Re:For this you want a professional product by boojum.cat · · Score: 1

      (I picked the one that zeroed out my taxes for the year. I didn't get audited.)

      Yet.

      --
      Lost: one sig, witty, 120 chars, sentimental value. Reward offered.
    112. Re:For this you want a professional product by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Well, there is that. I'd probably be helping you carry all those jars of pennies you're taking to the IRS if I hadn't given up on all my dreams years ago.

    113. Re:For this you want a professional product by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "In all fairness, they aren't the IRS' rules. They are Congress', and the IRS has the thankless task every year of trying to figure them out."

      The latter of the two sentences is true, but I don't see anything "fair" about it.

      Regardless of who created the rules, the IRS is the agency in charge of implementing and enforcing those rules. If it cannot do so, then it should not even exist. And it has proven itself, year after year, incapable of doing so. Therefore...

    114. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the IRS has something like that, but not many people use it because it's only setup for just basic taxes

      They have fill-in PDFs, but that doesn't allow for e-filing. So they're basically targeting the narrow demographic of people that want to use a computer to do their taxes but don't mind mailing it in.

    115. Re:For this you want a professional product by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is a shame that there is no "1040 YOU" form that involves plugging in only the numbers that matter to just you, and being done. I would be for it. Nevertheless, coming up with a YOU form that works for the 150 million taxpayers and the alarmingly high number of tax "situations" each find themselves in has proven to be a real challenge. Do you think the IRS *likes* spending all their time checking numbers and finding innocent mistakes when they could be chasing legitimate tax cheats?

    116. Re:For this you want a professional product by Dahan · · Score: 1

      That being said, I would like the IRS to come out with some basic tax forms which do the calculations and look up by itself. i.e., you would still need input the numbers, but the simple “multiple by 28%” and “Look up income in tax table” would be automated.

      http://www.freefilefillableforms.com. It's listed pretty prominently on irs.gov, and has been for a few years.

    117. Re:For this you want a professional product by edremy · · Score: 1

      "In all fairness, they aren't the IRS' rules. They are Congress', and the IRS has the thankless task every year of trying to figure them out."

      The latter of the two sentences is true, but I don't see anything "fair" about it. Regardless of who created the rules, the IRS is the agency in charge of implementing and enforcing those rules. If it cannot do so, then it should not even exist. And it has proven itself, year after year, incapable of doing so. Therefore...

      Honestly, put yourself in their shoes. Have you ever had your boss give you a literally impossible assignment and told you to accomplish it? It's not so much that they are incapable- it's that *no one* is capable of doing it. Looking back to my situation, I had folks who had spent their entire lives studying the US tax code unable to figure out what to do.

      Put the blame where it belongs- Congress. The tax code needs to be drastically simplified, but there are far too many well connected special interests who can game the current system to have it succeed.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    118. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on how much money you make and the state you are in. Because it reduces the amount of time the Treasury (both state and federal) have to dedicate to each taxpayer, they subsidize the software. Therefore, if you make enough money, you pay, if not, its free. With the states, similar rules apply. In my state, they also subsidize the software in different amounts, depending on your income. Plus, they don't change the tax laws as much, so it is cheaper anyway.

    119. Re:For this you want a professional product by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Note that this seems to have been killed in committee by the Dems before the Reps got around to killing it in committee.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    120. Re:For this you want a professional product by Dahan · · Score: 1

      As amazing as this seems, the IRS (and many state and muni tax agencies) have in fact figured out how to produce a form-style PDF that can be filled in ENTIRELY electronically. The IRS does make you do the math yourself, but I am sure you can find an open source calculator to help with that, right?

      While the IRS does provide PDFs, if you're OK with Flash, they also provide a version that you can fill in electronically, and it'll do the math for you too: Free File Fillable Forms. No income limits either.

    121. Re:For this you want a professional product by pla · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is a shame that there is no "1040 YOU" form

      You keep deliberately avoiding the merit of what I said in favor of attacking minutiae and strawmen. Whether someone enters six or sixty numbers; whether or not someone fills in nothing but a 1040EZ, or has 30 pages of esoteric tax documents even the beancounters don't often see...

      Those have no impact on the merit of having a form automatically do basic input validation, purely-internal-calculations, and cross-form propagation.

      So... We done here? Thanks for the dance, friend, but I'll sit the next one out if you don't mind.

    122. Re:For this you want a professional product by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Haha, not if you're a poor self-employed person! Go straight to the long form, do not pass go, do not collect a refund! Pardon me while I go cry in the corner.

      Well, if you're a smart self-employed person....you have incorporated yourself, (I prefer the "S" corp, allows you to save a LOT on SE taxes), and have kept track of expenditures and mileage and such that you can write off.

      Heck, self employment, if done correctly, is about the last bastion left to a US citizen for keeping more of their hard earned dollars to themselves.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    123. Re:For this you want a professional product by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      "Send you to jail?" My god, the stupidity that has erupted in a thread over taxes is phenomenal. Having grown up working in a tax service, reading through these comments makes me wince in pain. Most of you just need to shut up--or risk appearing like a buffoon.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    124. Re:For this you want a professional product by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In the US no one is required to submit taxes online. We can't even do it free for states, only for federal taxes.

    125. Re:For this you want a professional product by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Also, in the open source world, there is too much "It works for me." attitude.

      Also, one of the key benefits of open source is the supposed increased security. With tax software, the security aspect is so huge [I hope] that if people don't get to file their taxes securely, then they'll just walk and hopefully complain.

      Tax software is something that is best handled by the government or the free market.

    126. Re:For this you want a professional product by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Actually for most people it really isn't too complex. The basic are simple. The hard parts are identifying what is income, different tax rates for different types of income, and lots of different ways to deduct from your tax bill (ie, exemptions, incentives).

      For instance that biggest pain for me are with mutual funds. So when I need to list income I need to list what income I got from about 50 different stocks (annoying since I never purchase these directly myself). To know what income is I need to list the price of the stock when it was bought and the price when it was sold. To know the tax rate I also need to know when it was bought and sold. And the records aren't always there or easily accessible. Multiply that by all the transactions in a year and it's amazingly time consuming (though there are requirements now that financial institutions provide you with more of this data).

      But with that complication there's not much that practically can be simplified. You could tax everything at the same rate but then that encourages short term churning and discourages long term investments which exacerbates global economic instability. You could replace income tax with sales tax or VAT but that's a regressive tax which hurts poorer people disproportionately. Or you could have special rules that mutual funds are taxed as a single number instead of on each individual transaction, but then that's yet another special rule added to the tax code and you haven't solved anything.

      When you get down to the 1040-A or 1040-EZ form in the US they really are not that complex comparable to European taxes. A lot of people though want the more complicated 1040 form even if it is not strictly required because it provides many more ways to reduce your taxes in terms of deductions.

    127. Re:For this you want a professional product by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is a shame that there is no "1040 YOU" form

      You keep deliberately avoiding the merit of what I said in favor of attacking minutiae and strawmen. Whether someone enters six or sixty numbers; whether or not someone fills in nothing but a 1040EZ, or has 30 pages of esoteric tax documents even the beancounters don't often see...

      Those have no impact on the merit of having a form automatically do basic input validation, purely-internal-calculations, and cross-form propagation.

      So... We done here? Thanks for the dance, friend, but I'll sit the next one out if you don't mind.

      And yet you keep responding. One more in case you don't get it: there are a thousand commercial products and services that do exactly what you need, so quit fucking whining that the government doesn't cater you your every exact whim and want. end of story.

    128. Re:For this you want a professional product by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you are talking about.

      I'm referring to Taxact Free Edition which is free for anyone to use their website and to e-file a federal return. There are no income requirements.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    129. Re:For this you want a professional product by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Honestly, put yourself in their shoes."

      You seem to be assuming that I am blaming the IRS. Not so. Not only do I not claim that it's their fault, I will say openly that I simply don't give a damn what the reason behind it is. If it can't do the job it was created to do -- whether that is its own fault or someone else's -- then we should not be forced to suffer its existence. Period.

      I'm not pointing fingers and declaring that anybody in particular is responsible. I'm simply stating a practical fact. It has proven year after year that it simply can't do the job.

      Therefore, it doesn't need to exist.

    130. Re:For this you want a professional product by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      And my brother is the president and ceo of a large corporation, and he makes a 7 digit salary.

      Speaking of which, I make a seven digit salary too. Five of those digits are on the right side of the decimal, though.

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    131. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using open source instead of a program made by professionals with the help of accountants and tax professionals is incredibly stupid!

      Right, because "Open Source Software" is the opposite of "Software Made By Pros".
      What on Earth?

    132. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people are deathly afraid of being audited, but they really shouldn't be.

      When doing your taxes, if there's some ambiguous or confusing wording, simply select the interpretation that is to your advantage, and file your taxes. If the IRS disagrees, then they will contact you. Most people have visions of hordes of IRS lawyers swarming over your finances, demanding to see receipts going back 10 years, and auditing every aspect of your life. The reality is that most of the time the IRS will send a simple re-assessment: a letter stating "based on our records it seems you should have done X instead of Y." In such a case, all you have to do is send them a letter saying "My bad. Updated form enclosed with X. Cheque enclosed for difference." Seriously, it's not a big deal.

      My point is that you can afford to be somewhat aggressive in filing your taxes: either your return is accepted, or the IRS does the legwork of figuring out what you should instead have done.

      Obviously this only applies if you're filing your taxes 'in good conscience'. If you're purposefully cheating on your taxes (e.g. getting paid under the table), then you're right to be afraid of an audit. But if you can demonstrate that your filing was done in good conscience (to the best of your ability to understand the tax code), you'll be fine.

    133. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no requirement to file one's tax online. People are still free to use the paper form and instructions that come with it.

      But the IRS does process returns files online faster. (A lot faster.) And what is more you can file your forms for free (as in money). If your adjusted gross income is below $57,000 you can use a number of different company's products to file your return. (As far as I know all are web based.) If it is above that you can still use a site to file the forms by filling them out online and submitting them.

      Yes, there is a trust issue that the company might leak one's data. But at the end of the day you can also choose to use paper and not trust anyone (other than the IRS).

    134. Re:For this you want a professional product by dbkluck · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It is, however, Turbo Tax which is lobbying for the IRS not to publish their own web-based E-Filing software:

      Steve Ryan, a lawyer for the tax-preparation industry who negotiated a deal that has the IRS promising not to set up its own Web portal for e-filing, says his argument was simple. "When the government becomes my competitor," Ryan says, "then I have every right to run an ad that says 'Big Brother is watching your keystrokes.'"

      http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9112083 I nearly choked when I read that. "Big Brother is watching my keystrokes"?! WTF? Of course they are, that's the point. They're not just watching, they're recording every value I enter into the form, so they can keep it in a file with my name, address, and social security number on it, and then use against me in a court of law! They get the exact same information if I use TurboTax, the only difference is TurboTax gets to watch my keystrokes, too, and then charge me for the privilege.

    135. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government does...kind of. Intuit provides a service linked from the IRS website that allows almost all filers, regardless of income, to file electronically for free. The catch is that the experience is almost as no frills as it gets: it's like filling out the paper form, line by line, on your computer, with minimal computational aids (steps that tell you to add line X with line Y can be done for you, but EVERYTHING ELSE, such as computing your tax, you have to do it with the benefit of the instruction manual).

      I don't really think the major companies are afraid of getting put out of business by this. The target market for this product are the people who were doing their taxes by hand to begin with. If you didn't do them by hand on paper, you aren't using this product.

    136. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is Free, and then there is Open Source.

      I concour - unless there are a bunch of lawyers and accountants who decided to become hacker-monks - a reliable, free tax program won't be possible.

      However, the original question was for Open Source. This is Free as in Speech, not Free as in beer. In my mind - all tax software needs to be Open Source. When one reads the DFP (Damn Fine Print,) the end user is responsible for any errors. How can I really trust that a chunk-o-software that I can't see the source actually do that? Didn't we have the same problem with voting machines? It also seems to me that tax law is really just a program, anyway. The government really ought to a) write a spec (which is already done) but also create a reference implementation. I would suspect that would close some loopholes, too. But, as it's ours (we the people) - we ought to be able to see the source.

      Hmmm, actually, this might be a good case for TDD, too. Government ought to create a bunch of tests to prove the implementation, and thus elements of the spec.

      It'll never happen, of course - the accounting industry would fight something that would take away the easy cash.

    137. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. But honestly, the burdens of society fall lightest on those who either can't bear them (the poor) or who can afford to shirk them (the rich). Of course, most people also find it more rewarding not to be poor, and getting rich not rewarding enough to justify the effort. Middle class is where it's at, baby.

    138. Re:For this you want a professional product by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

      I will give Tax Act a third endorsement even for a fairly complicated form with lots of 1099-B's, foreign tax credits and other weird stuff. I switched from Turbo Tax the year they put DRM on their product and I have never looked back. I have been asking Tax Act for several years to produce a version that would run on Linux and I would buy it every year. Unfortunately I have never gotten a response from them. However, I have been running it on an old Windows 2000 box without problems even thought the version for the 2011 tax year was not supposed to run under W2K. It ran flawlessly.

      I might experiment and try to load it under WINE and see what happens now. I have been meaning to do that for a couple of years, but it may be getting critical unless I want to set up an XP box just for Taxes.

      I like FOSS software and it is my first choice for most of what I do, but there are some things that I am MORE than willing to pay for when they are done right.

    139. Re:For this you want a professional product by fnj · · Score: 1

      Some proportion of rent. Up to a certain maximum.

    140. Re:For this you want a professional product by blinking_at · · Score: 1

      There are two issues more important than "free": 1) I would like tax software that runs natively on Linux, and 2) I would like tax software that isn't tainted by the smarmy lock-in mindset that infects quicken and turbotax. For example, one of the really annoying things about quicken is its proprietary data format. A widely accepted standard format for financial data would be a wonderful thing...

    141. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, most people making anywhere near 100K are probably better off itemizing, which takes the EZ out of the equation altogether.

    142. Re:For this you want a professional product by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      >virtualbox Windows taking up space on my drive.

      Try the online version? I use it for that exact reason (well, I use online for that reason - I use TaxAct since years ago, I went to H&R Block online, only to find my data and account from the past two years had vanished. No problems like that with TaxAct so far.)

    143. Re:For this you want a professional product by John+Marter · · Score: 1
    144. Re:For this you want a professional product by John+Marter · · Score: 1

      Having a deduction on money you spend does not expempt that expenditure from being labeled a tax. If you spend $20 on tax filing, that is $20 that you have spent. It is true that you don't have to pay a 25% (or whatever) tax on that $20. So you have $5 savings on tax. Net, that is still $15 more out of pocket that you pay to file taxes.

    145. Re:For this you want a professional product by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

      I tried TaxAct a couple of years ago and it was good but I ended up not using it. I forget what the exact problem was that drove me away, but one unfortunate thing about it was that most other services (such as Charles Schwab) allow TurboTax to pull information directly. The process for TaxAct wasn't nearly as simple. I know it's not TaxAct's fault and I've been meaning to give them another shot. Maybe next year I will (filed my taxes back in February).

    146. Re:For this you want a professional product by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Everyone should have a free, government supplied and transparent way of completing their taxes.

      They do. You can pick up most forms at your local post office. You may need to log in and print other forms, or visit your local irs agency.

      Personally i wouldn't trust a closed source package at all, since i cannot verify what its doing.

      Do you verify everything that every open source package does?

    147. Re:For this you want a professional product by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      1. Open Source, for the most part, is professional.

      Open Source for the most part is amateurish. Sure there are a lot of great open source products. But for every great product there are thousands of bad projects.

      2. Someone who has been coding for 18 years is more experienced that most of the "pro-coders" who work for companies selling product.

      The OP was referring to an 18 year old. You know a teenager that codes. Not someone who has been coding for 18 years.

      I can confirm, for myself, that it works correctly

      How did you do that? Do you read all of the tax code to verify it works correctly? Tax software is complicated because it constantly changes. What was true last year may not be true this year.

    148. Re:For this you want a professional product by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yep, and until the IRS decides that it is not proper to do deals like this with Turbo Tax, they'll be getting my hardcopy forms. This year, there is a new wrinkle in TurboTax attempting to monetize you. New York State is requiring efiling or the charge you $25. Mysteriously, TurboTax for NYS costs around $47 while the other states (if memory serves correct from previous years) are down around $27.

    149. Re:For this you want a professional product by gtall · · Score: 1

      New York State charges you $25 if you do not efile. They claim to have an agreement with several commercial tax program vendors not to charge you for efile but TurboTax charges you $47 for NYS if you need to buy it separately. My recollection is that state tax code for TurboTax used to cost about $27 last year.

    150. Re:For this you want a professional product by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the filing is free but there may still be a fee from H&R block to get a deposit.

      If you don't have your own bank account, then you may have to pay them the fee to get a deposit. If you provide your own bank account, IRS will deposit the money directly to your account without going through H&R Block.

      The problem with filing on H&R Block is that they have a sneaky way of getting you to authorize other fees. While you are filing, there would be several intermittent pages asking you to authorize different extra charges for this and that. If you do not read and keep clicking on Next, then you would incur those charges. You must click on "No Thanks" button every time it shows up. If you are eligible for free filing, not accept any extra charges, and provide your bank account info for deposit, then you would pay nothing.

    151. Re:For this you want a professional product by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 1

      It's called hyperbole, sir, or ma'am. It can be defined as , "A figure of speech in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect, as in I could sleep for a year or This book weighs a ton."

      When making a point, I find it is often necessary to make it as large and as obviously over the top as possible, to really drive the point home. It's a literary device, it's a sales-tactic and it's a form of speech that people use quite often in everyday conversation.

      As an aside; my question to you is this; how does one grow up working in a tax service? I, for one, grew up on a farm. Or, it could be argued that I grew up in school. Or, it could also be argued that I grew up in the Boy Scouts. But, really, how does one grow up while performing a professional job?

      Perhaps you should check your unnecessary rage?

    152. Re:For this you want a professional product by pprboy · · Score: 1

      In the US no one is required to submit taxes online. We can't even do it free for states, only for federal taxes.

      utah can file electronically for free. Got the fed state program from h&r block, used it to fill in and file fed electronically, do state then fill in the blanks on the state site from the completed form. electronic deposits, all done in a week. best $40 I spent (got the cd)

    153. Re:For this you want a professional product by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Well, with most of the tax software I've used, once the info's in it's mostly in. Subsequent years I just have to drop in W2s and 1099s, apply any credits for school or daycare, and done.

      I still always calculate what my deductions are versus the standard deduction, though. Once my deductions are the higher, I'll finally be able to prove to my mother that I'm not a failure. Not quite there yet. ;)

    154. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used this last year, thinking, "This is what I have been bitching for...free electronic filing, I like reading the instructions and understanding the tax code (a little at least). I don't need need the hand holding wizard and if it saves the government some money over me filing a paper return, great." The problem is that somewhere in the filing process my qualified dividends amount was not transmitted so the IRS claimed I filed for too little tax. I am still a year later and 4 attempts to rectify things, still waiting to get my full refund. Even though the IRS has acknowledged that there was a problem on the filing system, they don't have a way to fix my return. I spoke to 3 different "service" agents to no avail. Most of them seemed about as useful as a badly formed plank.
      Back to paper I go. At least I have not had problems with this in the past 20 years of filing.

    155. Re:For this you want a professional product by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I wonder why this is such a pain with California. Looking online it seems California does have a free e-file if you qualify, but Turbo Tax Deluxe charges me extra for e-filing with the state, and lists only 37 states where it will e-file federal and state at the same time. Maybe the reason is that Intuit is just charging me for the extra effort for them to have a separate e-filing process for those extra pesky states. (ie, TurboTax deluxe includes both federal plus one state, but if you buy state separately I think you get e-file included)

    156. Re:For this you want a professional product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because making the government's job harder and more labor intensive means they have to hire more people that they then have to pay with our tax dollars. Dumbass.

    157. Re:For this you want a professional product by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you want to pay extra to make their job easier, go right ahead, dumbass.

    158. Re:For this you want a professional product by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Why would specialists have to work for free? There are plenty of companies (and non-profits) that pays specielists to do their work, and still release open-source products.

    159. Re:For this you want a professional product by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Free software doesn't mean unpaid developers; lots of FLOSS developers get payed (and not badly) for their work.
      What's your obsession with paying for black-box software which nor you, nor a fellow programmer can audit, fix, or modify?

    160. Re:For this you want a professional product by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      That is quite true. In 2012, I'd expect USA to be using web-based interfaces for these sort of things.

    161. Re:For this you want a professional product by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I don't need to check *every* package myself, but I expect that most of them were checked by someone at some point.
      I can be 100% sure, there were no external audits of most black-box software.

    162. Re:For this you want a professional product by Graff · · Score: 1

      @pla: +1 because you are a 1%-er. ( intended as a wake up; I can't afford the 1% moniker, maybe I'm in the top 10)

      First off - "@pla"? You just replied to him, of course it's at him. This isn't Twitter or whatever, the @name construct is nearly meaningless on Slashdot.

      Secondly - someone who has a regular job, does some work on the side, and has a little cash to buy some stocks is suddenly a "1%" thingamabob? Has the country fallen so far that people think these activities are only for the ultra-elite? I'd call those activities somewhere between the "25%-er" to "50%-er".

      And yes, for most people doing their individual taxes should be mind-numbingly simple. It's extremely basic grade-school math. You total up some numbers, look up stuff in some tables, do some more additions and subtractions and done. The wording can be a little tricky but anyone with a 8th grade reading level should be able to puzzle it out. If the majority can't do these activities then they pay the "ignorant slob" tax and go to a preparer. Honestly I think it's more about lazy and less about ability.

      Where it gets complicated is when you start doing heaving investing, trading, contracting, running multiple complex businesses, or using tons of odd deductions. That's where a college-level finance education is really helpful to figure everything out, maybe even a team of dedicated professionals, hey now were getting into the "1%-er" range!

    163. Re:For this you want a professional product by m3000 · · Score: 1

      How do you figure this? A Dem sponsored it, while no Republican are on board, while a bill explicitly prohibiting this has 27 Republican sponsors.

  2. Lawyers can offer open source services as well. by concealment · · Score: 1

    You make a good point, but if an open source organization were to offer malpractice insurance, lawyers could offer their services on an open source basis as well. They would be no different than any other Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) including documentation authors.

    1. Re:Lawyers can offer open source services as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect TurboTax can arrange insurance a whole heck of a lot cheaper than any free software team. Actually, I doubt if any insurance company would touch it at all, unless they could be assured that the software was reasonably accurate (and how would they do that? Don't say "They can see the code," 'cause I'll laugh.)

      I understand the notion of keeping one's data private, but it's just not going to happen. TurboTax doesn't provide a simple dump (other than the tax form itself) to help keep its customers; not nice, but not unique. And while they might sell or lose stuff to outsiders, they hopefully have a little more infrastructure (which is expensive) and motivation (their continued existence) to avoid a big security fail, compared to a GPL shop that explicitly takes no responsibility for their product.

  3. Open Tax Solver by rbowen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's one: https://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaxsolver/

    Having said that, I have found that paying a professional has always been a worthwhile investment. I have a masters degree in mathematics, so it's not a question of the calculations, but my accountant knows things about tax law that I don't, and keeps me from getting audited while getting me the best refunds that the law allows.

    --
    Apache guy, Open Source enthusiast, runner
    1. Re:Open Tax Solver by Kenja · · Score: 2

      More then that, in most cases if you get audited H&R Block etc will represent you and try to get it cleared up.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Open Tax Solver by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      The math itself is pretty simple... I don't think there's anything beyond basic addition/subtraction and percentage. However, knowing when you can and can't apply it is the tricky part. The only thing preventing me from doing the 1040EZ form is my student loan interest and that alone made paying for tax software worth it (even though I still didn't get anymore back than I would have with the 1040EZ... still nice to know).

    3. Re:Open Tax Solver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 207 downloads in 8 years, and 71% recommendation rate (5/8 users recommend this product!) how could you possibly go wrong. There's even a screenshot from 2004 (which looks like it's from 1994), so you know you're using a quality up-to-date product.

    4. Re:Open Tax Solver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a degree in math too.

      It is amazing about how the '$' causes an affinity for the side of the equals sign that usually does not apply to me.

    5. Re:Open Tax Solver by berashith · · Score: 1

      exactly. I had a guy once ( i moved away, cant use him now) that would look through my papers, ask very interesting questions, and find ways to apply laws to my situation. saved me thousands in fees and penalties in ways that I wasnt aware of. Some people are worth paying very well for the service that their knowledge can provide. This accountant had to stay current and remember years of experience to provide the quality service that he gave me.

    6. Re:Open Tax Solver by ggpauly · · Score: 1

      Here's a project I started & abandoned several years ago:

      https://sourceforge.net/projects/autotax/

      This is an extension of the IRS fillable pdf forms, adding calculations.

      This was envisioned as "computer-assisted" as opposed to fully automated, which might address a lot of the "my situation is unique" objections.

      I abandoned the project because people were eager to use it but not contribute.

      --
      Verbum caro factum est
    7. Re:Open Tax Solver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1040EZ is seriously the worst form ever. It's almost impossible for you to have lived through the year and not had some deductions. 1040EZ is the fast-lane towards maximizing your tax bill.

    8. Re:Open Tax Solver by PenquinCoder · · Score: 2

      With 207 downloads in 8 years, and 71% recommendation rate (5/8 users recommend this product!) how could you possibly go wrong. There's even a screenshot from 2004 (which looks like it's from 1994), so you know you're using a quality up-to-date product.

      You should learn to read a bit.

      207 downloads (This week)
      Take a look at the timeline

    9. Re:Open Tax Solver by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The big issue with a lot of tax advice is that it isn't black or white. There are some ways to take deductions and credits that could trigger an audit or have some chance of being rejected by the IRS. In essence, you get to choose your tax payment strategy - either conservative and unlikely to get bothered by the IRS or risky, likely to give you a better yield (less taxes) but has more chance of being questioned.

      The full analysis of this requires specific facts of your situation and the law. It ain't easy. Its' a professional service.

      To paraphrase an old quote - He who uses himself as their own tax accountant has a fool for a client.

      (YMMV, probably overkill in simple cases but that's what a 1040 EZ is for.)

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Open Tax Solver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More then that, in most cases if you get audited H&R Block etc will represent you and try to get it cleared up.

      Ahh, no. They will represent you ONLY if it can be demonstrated that it was their error. They are rather conservative so its extremely unlikely the error will be theirs. Most audits occur because of missing, incomplete, or inaccurate information (intentional or otherwise) reported to the tax filing service. Which basically means, for the majoirty of issues where you are likely to be audited, H&R Block will only represent you for a rather large service fee.

    11. Re:Open Tax Solver by Exoman · · Score: 1

      I have a simple solution that would make nearly ALL of this go away.

      Create a new "File Under Constrained Key, Yourself" rule that states that ANY and EVERY person responsible for creating or modifying tax law, regulation or code shall file such taxes without benefit of professional help or outside reference besides the tax forms themselves (contrained key).

      I imagine the tax code would become simple faster than you could say, "Go F*** Yourself!" The name could be our little inside joke, but the principle is completely serious.

    12. Re:Open Tax Solver by CozmicCharlie · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly true... H & R Block will represent their software and will trestify that their calculations were accurate. They will not represent whether or not the numbers you plugged in are "right".

  4. Guessing not.. by Anrego · · Score: 1

    There are lots of programmers out there with diverse interests, but tax law seems like the kind of thing you need to pay people to deal with, and as far as I know no one has ponied up the cash.

    At the very least, you need to pay people to confirm everything you've done is correct. I don't know where liability would fall if your taxes were incorrect due to a bug in libretax or whatever, but I don't think I'd want to find out ;p

    1. Re:Guessing not.. by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Liability always falls on the person filing the tax. Even with commercial software like TurboTax. This is why Intuit, H&R Block, etc offer liability protection and audit assistance as a selling point - to help reduce your actual liability.

      Fun Fact: Even if the IRS screws up, the taxpayer is still liable.

    2. Re:Guessing not.. by Malties · · Score: 1

      So you are saying there are not a lot of people out there who make tax law a personal hobby? I would never have thought that.

    3. Re:Guessing not.. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Tax law is constantly in flux. So tax software is more like a service than a product. You need yearly updates to remain current. You can't just use last year's software even if it is a commercial version.

      This "support" model is not what Free Software is good at.

      Taxes are also not simple. If yours are non-trivial, then you are far better off paying a competent professional instead of trying to be miserly with the attempts to replace an accountant with software.

      The value of even the commercial tax software is highly debatable regardless of how it was developed or what license it sues.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Guessing not.. by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 1

      Well, the "support" model is not what free software is good at. Free software can do it just fine.

    5. Re:Guessing not.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but tax law seems like the kind of thing you need to pay people to deal with

      Because having to deal with tax laws is f@#$@ depressing.
      There are many stupid things people do and I can ignore that but tax law is the pyramid of human feces, dead rotten cats, dog piss and rat vomit times 100 that I have to deal with every year.

    6. Re:Guessing not.. by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Heh...you probably thought Trekkies were bad. Wait till a Tax Nerd corners you at a party.

      Slightly on-topic...this site might be a good place to get specific tax questions answered.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    7. Re:Guessing not.. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

      And the gubmint gets to level fines that would be illegal for anyone else. Had a friend who was a few months late sending off state taxes of $113. Got a penalty/interest bill for $107. Wish I was joking. Try and put a 95% penalty into a promissory note and watch how fast it gets laughed out of court.

  5. A recent urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Rumor has it if you just send in your tax documents without filling anything in they will calculate your taxes for you and give you many deductions you might not have thought you could do.

    1. Re:A recent urban legend by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

      Until you get assessed a penalty for filing frivolous returns....

      --
      Twitter: @dainsanefh
    2. Re:A recent urban legend by vlm · · Score: 1

      If you owe money they'll whomp you with penalties you cannot imagine (like 200% the difference) Been there done that. My specific problem was related to DCRA with both parents employed interacting both with each other's limit and some other child credit.

      There is no theoretical way they could have the data for how much you donated to church or paid in medical bills unless you send the receipts and donation letters to them, so I'm mystified about this "give you deductions".

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:A recent urban legend by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      Well it's at least half true. A couple years ago i just filled out my taxes the usual way, just copying numbers over from my W2 form into the appropriate boxes in the EZ whatever form. (I'm pretty sure i'd already started using FreeTaxUSA by that point, a service which seems perfectly adequate for the basic job, if not spectacular.)

      As expected when i was done i found that i would be getting a moderate refund. (I try to set up my deductions to make sure that happens, the amount of interest i'm theoretically losing is pretty tiny, and the extra pain i'd have to go through if i found i owed more just isn't worth it.) So i hit "send" and promptly forgot about it. Then a couple weeks later i got a letter from the IRS telling me they'd corrected my taxes. Needless to say i was rather freaked out when i started reading the letter... until i got to the part where my new refund was about one or two hundred dollars _larger_ than what i'd come up with on my own. (And no, it wasn't a nice round number like the special "rebates" they keep giving us.) I don't know if i screwed up the math somewhere or just missed a really obvious deduction, but whatever it was the IRS caught it and decided i should get more money.

      I have no idea how dependable that is, and i certainly don't expect them to catch all the deductions possible for people with a more complicated tax situation, but it seems if the IRS notices a problem they will correct it, no matter whose favor that mistake is in.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:A recent urban legend by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      That sounds similiar to how Chuck Norris does it. He just sends in a blank copy of the form with a photo of himself, crouched and ready attack.

    5. Re:A recent urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a single W2 job and the standard payroll withholding, they don't actually care if you file the forms. I know bunch of people who haven't filed in various years -- in most cases they are just screwing themselves out of a small refund.

    6. Re:A recent urban legend by Jeng · · Score: 1

      If the IRS owes you money on a return they will let you take your time, I think you may have up to five years.

      But if you owe the IRS money they will be on your ass before you know it.

      So they do care if you don't file the forms, but only if you owe them money.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    7. Re:A recent urban legend by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I think you have to give some kudos to the IRS. I've been dealing with them concerning my parent's taxes (my dad died, left an unholy mess). Yes, I have an accountant (and a lawyer) involved but they've been polite, helpful and reasonable in terms of time frames.

      They've done a pretty good job of cleaning up their act in terms of their public face. I'm sure it's not perfect, I'm sure there are horror stories out there. But they've improved and they seem to keep trying pretty hard.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:A recent urban legend by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      This is true in Canada. I've had the government correct my taxes *in my favour* when I've made a mistake. In University, I knew people that would just send in the receipts and income slips, and sure enough, the taxes were done for them.

      I suspect this only works in cases where the taxes are simple, since the government is checking the incoming taxes for fraud anyway. If your tax situation isn't complicated, it's no more work to actually do the taxes than check them.

      But the tax situation in Canada is significantly more simple to begin with. It used to take me a couple hours, once a year, and all at once to file my taxes. I actually kind of enjoyed it. Now my situation is more complicated, and I'm more concerned with spending the money to get the best possible tax return than spend my time. My accountant has definitely saved me more than they've charged.

    9. Re:A recent urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we talking about Canada? NO.

    10. Re:A recent urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably qualified for the Earned Income Credit. Same type of thing happened to me once when I had a low (but not too low!) income for the year.

  6. Just be careful by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

    Be careful. While any such FOSS tools might be fully accurate, sometimes it's worth extra money to ge the gaurantees and backing from a TurboTax, H&R Block, etc. in case there are any inaccuracies. And you can export out yoyr return as a pdf for your records. Sometimes ideology is not as important as getting backing in case the IRS comes snooping. *shrug*

  7. Just proves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That most people that use open source are just cheap skates...

    1. Re:Just proves by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You mean like Windows users that steal anything that's not nailed down?

      I use Free Software because it's not crap. It helps that it's a re-implementation of a good design (namely Unix). I would pay a pretty penny for it if I had to. Nearly did with Solaris x86.

      That said: I wouldn't trust my taxes to free software, expensive software, or underpaid drones that aren't real tax professionals.

      Taxes are the only part of the legal profession where a post-JD degree is required to practice in the field.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Just proves by xeno314 · · Score: 1

      Don't know where you're living/what jurisdiction you mean, but you don't need anything above a JD to practice federal tax law, generally speaking. You can go get an LLM in tax if that's what you want, but that's mostly for academics or *really* heavy lifters in the field.

  8. Do you do this for everything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hey guys, I need a new pacemaker. Rather than paying thousands of dollars for one, does anyone have an Arduino solution? Shouldn't be that hard.

  9. Excel 1040 by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's sort of open source, as open as an excel spreadsheet goes anyway. Works fine in OpenOffice Calc. I've been using it for years, haven't been audited yet.

    http://home.mchsi.com/~taxcalculator/

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:Excel 1040 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy comic-sans batman!

    2. Re:Excel 1040 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also find this definitely open source spreadsheet to be useful. For the past several years I have prepared both my personal tax forms and those of my parents using it. There are many eyes focused on the details of this spreadsheet and any errors are quickly fixed. Much credit is due to the author and his group of testers.

      By the way, the new address is: http://www.excel1040.com

    3. Re:Excel 1040 by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Not that there is anything wrong with using a simple spreadsheet to calculate your taxes, but the IRS generally doesn't audit people who are too cheap to shell out 20 bucks for tax software. They are looking for people with a bit deeper pockets.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:Excel 1040 by ddd0004 · · Score: 2

      It's ok to use Comic-sans if you center align all the elements on the page. It's a case of two wrongs making a right.

  10. Privacy vs Cheapskate.... by SrJsignal · · Score: 1

    So are you just a cheapskate or are you truly concerned about giving them your information?
    I ask because if you go to the store and buy Turbo Tax, you don't have to give them your information and send it anyplace. That's what I do / have been doing for a long time. I'm paying them to guarantee me that they have interpreted the tax code properly, I'm totally fine with that.
    I like some open source stuff, but I need a company to stand behind something that can royally screw me over if it's wrong.

    1. Re:Privacy vs Cheapskate.... by Americano · · Score: 1

      truly concerned about giving them your information?

      Aren't tax returns public information anyway? What information would you be "handing over" to TurboTax that anybody else couldn't get with a properly-formatted FOIA request to the IRS anyway?

    2. Re:Privacy vs Cheapskate.... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      No, private tax returns aren't public.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Privacy vs Cheapskate.... by Americano · · Score: 1

      It appears they're not - my mistake. I was somehow under the impression that the tax records went public after a time.

      Further reading here on the irs website, prompted by yours & and alexander_686's response disabused me of the notion.

      I learned something new today!

  11. Not Open Source, but at least it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a CPA and I would recommend using taxact.com. While it's not open source, it is free for any income level (for federal filing) and user friendly (if you can ignore the upselling of the deluxe version along the way). Given the frequency with which the tax law changes, it's doubtful a FOSS solution will emerge in this segment.

    1. Re:Not Open Source, but at least it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been using TaxAct for years after I learned TurboTax starting uploading your tax data to their servers. They've been doing that for over a decade. Now I install TaxAct, let it do it's update, then firewall the app(Comodo) just to be sure, then do my taxes, and yes I still send it by mail. Install a pdf printer like Bullzip and you can print your return to PDF(so you don't have to buy the deluxe version).

      I've heard H&R Block sells your data as well. Have you ever wondered why you get so much junk mail(email), well it's because of companies like this.

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2436396/posts
      http://www.ripoffreport.com/income-tax-service/intuit-inc-turbo-tax/intuit-inc-turbo-tax-bogus-c-d2b3e.htm

      "We won't do anything nefarious with your data, honest, you can trust us." "We won't ruin your computer with our rootkit." Yeah right.

      There actually used to be more news coverage of this BS but I suppose Intuit works hard to get it removed.

    2. Re:Not Open Source, but at least it's free by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I tried Tax Act and they said I had to pay $200 to the Feds. Went to HR Block and I'm getting a $900 refund.

      How is that possible?

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    3. Re:Not Open Source, but at least it's free by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      You entered something incorrectly into Tax Act. Had an HR Block person entered your data into Tax Act, it too would have given you $900 refund.

      Filing taxes:
      Part 1: Knowing what things you did last year were tax events.
      Part 2: Knowing how to apply those tax events to the tax code.
      Part 3: Simple math.

      The HR Block person, if you used an HR Block person, helped you with parts 1 and 2. If you meant HR Block software, then their software asked a question of you in a way that you understood better or differently than Tax Act. If you know where the $1100 difference comes from, go back into Tax Act and find the question you answered differently and its results will match.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:Not Open Source, but at least it's free by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I tried Tax Act and they said I had to pay $200 to the Feds. Went to HR Block and I'm getting a $900 refund.

      How is that possible?

      1. You gave each company different info or answered a question differently (easy to do).
      2. One company may have screwed up (you don't know which one).
      3. One company may be more aggressive at determining deductions or credits which might increase or decrease your chance at being audited.

      I would hazard a guess that if you gave your returns to 10 different tax preparers you'd get 8 different answers. In fact, that's been done by some news organization in the past ?NPR or somesuch and that's what happened.

      There is no black or white, there is only grey!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Not Open Source, but at least it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because federal tax law is intentionally non-deterministic?

    6. Re:Not Open Source, but at least it's free by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Simple data entry error most likely. It's pretty trivial to overlook things sometimes.

      I once nearly forgot to claim exemptions for my kids because I didn't fill in how many months of the year they lived with me.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    7. Re:Not Open Source, but at least it's free by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      That's what I attribute it to however, the ease of Tax Act obviously wasn't so easy for this analytical mind.

      I answered all the questions and had nothing left over and just ended up wasting 2 hours on it.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  12. Why should taxpayers NEED accountants and lawyers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current US tax system has no redeeming value. It is currently used to reward friends and as a jobs program for tax experts. Maybe if the system were designed for a 21st century economy there would be no need for April 15th and tax software.

  13. Open Source Tax Software? by Lancelaut · · Score: 1

    I found FreeFileFillableForms.com to be very helpful free efile service that is sponsored by the irs.gov website. You fill in the pdf files and has all the instructions you need. It even has a few fields that are calculated by the site to ensure you don't make calculation mistakes.

  14. Government should give away such software. by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tax compliance is in Federal interest, and with standard Free and Open software everyone could use the same application.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:Government should give away such software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe this only has a Score:3.

    2. Re:Government should give away such software. by dalias · · Score: 1

      Yes but the government is generally adverse to destroying the business model of a very profitable industry...

    3. Re:Government should give away such software. by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      While I agree, the government is never going to write that software with the goal of finding you the most/best deductions.

    4. Re:Government should give away such software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL, you think the federal government knows anything about the tax laws?

    5. Re:Government should give away such software. by larkost · · Score: 1

      I agree with the idea, but the Tax Software companies spend a lot of money to make sure this never happens:

      http://www.consumercal.org/article.php?id=127

      I have seen other examples, but that was the first one a little bit of googling turned up.

    6. Re:Government should give away such software. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Very true...
      Everyone filing in the same way would make it much easier to track errors and investigate how someone came to a particular calculation, while having the code open would allow people to see exactly how the software came to its conclusion.
      It would also be a fair system, since every tax payer would have equal access to the same software.

      They could also try simplifying the tax system. A simpler system makes for less errors, less loopholes, less scope for tax evasion and much easier prosecution of anyone found breaking the rules.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Government should give away such software. by Leafheart · · Score: 2

      Starting last year, I begun paying US tax (I'm a non-resident Alien so I pay both the US tax and my home country taxes, in this case Brazil) and I find it mind boggling that there is not a government software for these. Specially since the US tax code is arcane and byzantine, and in some cases borderline ridiculous. It explains why there is such a huge industry behind tax filling there.

      Here in Brazil we have had an official tool for the past 8 years IIRC. Done in Java also, so you can run pretty much everywhere. And also, unless you have a bloody ton of special cases, you really do not need a pro to help you do your taxes. Even on cases like mine, where I had to put what was payed on international taxes and calculate whatelse is left and possible discounts, I still do not need to deal with even a tenth than I have to deal with the US tax code. And that is because I'm simply barred for most of your discounts.

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    8. Re:Government should give away such software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they did they'd have an incentive to get rid of all deductions. If they want to encourage or discourage certain behaviour they should use sales tax and VAT instead of dumping it on individual taxpayers.

    9. Re:Government should give away such software. by djbckr · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the tax software industry would not sit still for that. I used to work for one (not Intuit). As the posters above have said, there is an enormous investment in these companies to update their software every year to accomodate the tax changes. It's way more complicated than most people would believe.

    10. Re:Government should give away such software. by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      I dunno... the cynic in me thinks that the gubmint is probably happy to let it stay somewhat vague. For every audit they do, I imagine there's some number of people who paid way, way too much.

      I know that for the first couple of years I wasn't claiming the child tax credit (yay for credits which are WAY > deductions!); nobody told me I could until I started using tax software. My fault for not looking into it, but I was set in my tax-y ways.

    11. Re:Government should give away such software. by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      Is the US the only country that virtually requires that you pay (and divulge your financial information to) a private third party in order to fulfill your tax obligations? I remember reading a while back that Intuit and other companies actually retain lobbyists in DC just to keep it this way, and to keep the tax code as complicated as possible. Can't vouch for the truth of that, though.

      If you ever need an example of the Public Good being sacrificed wholesale for a corporate special interest, you won't do much better than this.

    12. Re:Government should give away such software. by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

      This would require the government understanding their own rules.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    13. Re:Government should give away such software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia provides software to individuals trying to do their taxes. Although I cannot comment on the complexity of their tax law vs the U.S. while I worked there I foudn the software very convient and able to handle some of my more complicated deductions.

    14. Re:Government should give away such software. by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands, our IRS-equivalent provides an income tax application. Not open source as far as I know, but there is a Windows, Mac and Linux version.

    15. Re:Government should give away such software. by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Trust me. If you know anything about how contractors write software for the federal government, you should
      be thrilled to know there are many excellent 3rd party software packages available for 20 bucks.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    16. Re:Government should give away such software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I moved from the US to Belgium a few years ago. In Belgium, I file my taxes by plugging my ID card into a card reader attached to my computer and answering a few questions in my web browser. I spend more time and money informing the US government that I don't owe it anything than I do dealing with the government to which I actually pay taxes, and that's despite dealing with a government legendary for its bureaucracy and filing the Belgian tax return in a language I only started learning a short time ago (Dutch -- I think my first year I filed in barely remembered high-school French).

      This, by the way, is the only way in which American bureaucracy even remotely touches Belgian bureaucracy. On any other matter, Belgian bureaucrats run red-taped, rubber-stamped circles around American bureaucrats any day of the week....

    17. Re:Government should give away such software. by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      Actually, in a different world (Norway, actually), the tax people are obliged by law to calculate your tax in the way which result in the lowest tax for the taxpayer (based on the numbers they have been given, of course). That of course include all deductions you are entitled to. No tricks.
      Also, most institutions deliver the numbers in electronic format to the tax office so that we get a filled in form with the numbers and an estimated tax which we can use as a starting point for the tax return. For a fair number of taxpayers the pre-filled in form contain the correct numbers.

    18. Re:Government should give away such software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? The government should be "for the people, by the people". If it was decided that somebody meeting X requirement deserve $Y tax deductions, there really should not be any hesitation, games, or labyrinths of paperwork to prevent that person from claiming that deduction.

    19. Re:Government should give away such software. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Yes but the government is generally adverse to destroying the business model of a very profitable industry..."

      True. Only in horror movies do puppets kill their masters.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    20. Re:Government should give away such software. by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      It also runs on Linux (under WINE).

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  15. Check out TaxAct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used TaxAct for several years now. State taxes are pretty straightforward once you've done the federal, but I do buy the $15 state software to make my life easier, and as a token of gratitude.

  16. The Main Barrier by utkonos · · Score: 2

    The main barrier is that tax software is different every year. Each year the tax code is changed then published. This published tax code is not readable by mortals. It is read by tax lawyers who work with the tax prep software makers to make sure that this years tax code is reflected in the tax prep software.

    As much as I love FOSS, I doubt that a volunteer community would be able to pull off this level of complexity and do it on time each year.

    Being that it would be a community effort, what happens if the guy who is in charge of component X gets a new job and can't devote his time to getting that component out the door on time. In most FOSS communities this is not a problem. That component just doesn't get worked on until someone picks up the torch later on. In tax prep software this would be a showstopper. The whole thing would grind to a halt if the whole piece of software does not reflect accurately the current year's tax code.

    1. Re:The Main Barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't have to be a community necessarily to do it. A company, or group of companies, could just as easily do it. And not all FLOSS has to be free as in beer (even FSF admits that).

      For example, if several of the companies (e.g. Intuit) got together they could develop an Apache Licensed engine (ASL would work best for their business models) that any one could use to build a general tax software package. They would then build their own database to be used by the engine, and perhaps customize the user interface as well. Each year, they contribute their previous year's database back to the main project. This could encourage more competition in the area of tax software, while also reducing their maintenance costs by a degree that should make it worthwhile.

      Better yet, the IRS should encourage this to be done by spearheading it and getting the companies together.

      Yeah, I know - some of you slashdotters are going to complain b/c I specified the ASL instead of the GPL. However, in this case, the ASL would be the best license to encourage this to happen. That doesn't mean someone couldn't take it and generate a GPL version too - they could; but you're not going to get Intuit or other major prioritary companies doing this (when they don't already do some kind of open source) without having a business friendly license. It's a matter of choosing the best license for the job - and that won't always be the GPL.

    2. Re:The Main Barrier by ggpauly · · Score: 1

      Why so negative about free software? Why can't someone else step in to fill the gap left by a departing contributer? Mostly tax stuff isn't difficult, just very detailed.

      What's lacking is community support; There's no fundamental flaw in the free software model.

      --
      Verbum caro factum est
    3. Re:The Main Barrier by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

      The main barrier is that tax software is different every year. Each year the tax code is changed then published. This published tax code is not readable by mortals. It is read by tax lawyers who work with the tax prep software makers to make sure that this years tax code is reflected in the tax prep software.

      As much as I love FOSS, I doubt that a volunteer community would be able to pull off this level of complexity and do it on time each year.

      Then factor in that each jurisdiction has differing tax codes. Open Source works really well when developers have an itch they need scratched, and can find other similar developers from a diverse community. I may be an expert developer with decades of experience, but would you really want a developer (i.e.: not a tax expert) from British Columbia, Canada, writing tax algorithms for someone in Texas?

      Taxes are different from other OSS problems in that there are thousands of different jurisdictions, with completely different tax rules and requirements. This seriously fragments the development community, and restricts the userbase. I'm not sure if you could extract sufficient commonality (other than "requires math") to even create a generic tax-software base upon which country-specific tax information could be fed (a sort of tax meta-language, if you will) -- at least not without some sort of significant standardization between countries, states, provinces, etc. Which isn't going to happen.

      Specialized and expensive domain knowledge + fragmented developer base + fragmented user base + constantly changing domain == bad fit with OSS software development. You'd probably need a government entity backing the effort with sufficient specialized staff to even make it plausible.

      Yaz

    4. Re:The Main Barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Open source tax preparation would only work if it was administered by the government and/or the tax professionals who pay to get the job done. FOSS community development (which is the only way such a thing would be "free") is notoriously unresponsive to changing requirements. Those requirements change every year, and the users are almost exclusively interested in using the most up-to-date version. Think of it this way: the software requirements change every time a user wants to use the software, and every time the user wants to use the software, they have a strict deadline for it. It is one of the most demanding high-maintenance projects conceivable, and responsiveness is one of the traditional weaknesses of FOSS communities.

    5. Re:The Main Barrier by utkonos · · Score: 1

      I'm not down on free software. I'm just a pragmatist. I've participated in many projects and if one driver's source code is neglected for a year or two, it does not bring the whole project to a halt. However, in tax prep software, if the developer who is working on the module that you load if you itemize and you own a farm in the US drops out of the project, and the project does not have someone to replace that developer immediately, the whole project halts and can't ship in January.

      I've been thinking about what the solution to this problem is. I do think there should be FOSS tax prep software. How do you get there? Have the IRS run the project and make the software. Have all the code released under a BSD style license so that current tax prep software can use the code as they want without worrying about GPL violations.

  17. Why downvote as off-topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This: For this you want a professional product (Score:1, Offtopic)

    It doesn't answer the question, it solves the problem. Fill out a PDF. The instructions are clear. If the instructions are NOT clear, you should not be filling out your own taxes.

    ALL tax software is ONLY as good as a spreadsheet and you should not be trusting the numbers if you cannot cross-check them.

    If you do not understand your own taxes, you should get someone that does; after years I finally have someone that can do them, and do them cheaper than I can online, and I can follow each and every form/number when they are done. If you don't understand when you are done, you are either being screwed (losing money) or setting yourself up to get screwed (exposing yourself to risk).

    Seriously, your taxes will be picked apart by a human when/if you are audited, you deserve the same as a defense.

    1. Re:Why downvote as off-topic? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, what happens if you get audited, and the auditor finds that you have actually been over paying your tax?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Why downvote as off-topic? by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      If the IRS finds an error in your favor, they will correct your return and issue you a refund. This is true in audit situations as well as in the simple processing of your return.

      To the main point, I have used turbo tax for close to 20 years, and can't imagine why someone wouldn't want to use a cheap and usable application like this. You have to be really cheap to not spring for the 34 dollars that you can get Turbo Tax for at Costco.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    3. Re:Why downvote as off-topic? by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      The reading I've done says: Believe it or not, they might actually pay you. However, they are very unlikely to point out overpayments to you without an audit, and chances are you won't even be audited if you overpaid. If you find on your own that you did overpay, I think you have to file an amended return, meaning it's a very good idea to be prepared with every document you have supporting said overpayment.

    4. Re:Why downvote as off-topic? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      They will give you a refund. (with some and, if's and but's in that sentence.)

      I seen a lot of polite letters from the IRS saying they found a mistake the in tax return, and
          1. Here is your refund or
          2. You underpaid, Please send in the differance plus intrest and (sometimes) penalty.

    5. Re:Why downvote as off-topic? by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      Yup, my own anecdote points to this being the case. On a whim, I called the IRS (can't really remember why now) and asked a basic question about something, they looked up my account and said that they owed me like two thousand dollars. They said I had to file the amended form which the telephone agent mailed to me and told me what I needed to change. I got the return, filled it out and sent it in and received my two grand a short time later.

      But yeah, they weren't in any hurry to throw money at me unless I pointed out the error. Even then, however, I never really pointed out any error at all -- the phone rep did.

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    6. Re:Why downvote as off-topic? by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      That's pretty badass of the rep. Makes it sound like all those accounts just gather dust until someone (you, rep, or act of God) opens Pandora's box*.

      *That phrase always makes me giggle even at 32 years old.

    7. Re:Why downvote as off-topic? by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah; I dunno if it's required by law or something for the rep to say if you have money coming back, but I sure appreciated it all the same. Every once in a while, you run across a government employee that seems to honestly care about his/her fellow citizens.

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  18. Not likely to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tax software is one area where it's highly unlikely we are going to see open source alternatives. Writing tax software requires a great deal of time, knowledge and testing. It also helps to have accountants and lawyers and support people on staff. In other words, it costs money and who is going to front that kind of money and then give away the source code?

  19. Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citizen) by ciantic · · Score: 1

    I'm from Finland were individuals and (at least that I know of) small companies can submit income taxes through provided internet forms, and individuals gets them pre-filled. (It still isn't perfect but it does have some validation and such...)

    But first answer above "this is the kind of product that is done with help of lawyers and accountants" begs the question how freaking complicated is the US taxation forms?

  20. IRS Site has Free Options by mikestew · · Score: 4, Informative

    If your main criteria is "freely available" and not "open source", and your adjusted gross income is less than $57K, you can just fill out the forms for free. It uses Adobe Flash if you have an aversion to such things, and there doesn't appear to be anything open source about it.

    If your AIG is more than $57K, your tax situation is probably such that you ought to be handing over some money to a pro or Turbo Tax.

    1. Re:IRS Site has Free Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just that your AGI has to be less than $57k. There are also a bunch of forms not supported in the free thing. Notably if you have Schedule K-1, stock trades, AMT, and a few others. None of those will work and if you need them you can't use the free filing system at all even if you made less than $57k.

      It's a bit bizarre because you can do business stuff, just not those forms.

    2. Re:IRS Site has Free Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you don't have to have an AGI $57K. Anyone can use the Free File Fillable Forms link. I've done it for the past two years. Yes, it means I have to download and read the 1040 instructions PDF from irs.gov and type in the numbers from the boxes on my W2s and 1099s. But the online system will keep track of the numbers as you enter them and do the basic math like adding up all the lines in my schedule B and copying the result back to the 1040. I don't worry about the math mistakes anymore, and I'm more accurate typing in numbers than copying them by hand. When you're done it will electronically submit to the IRS. Doesn't cost a dime.

      The only difference I can see between it and something like TurboTax is that TurboTax will ask you yes/no questions whereas I had to read the 1040 instructions and ask the questions to myself.

  21. Vote Ron Paul For President by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

    Then you don't have to deal with taxes anymore!

    --
    Twitter: @dainsanefh
    1. Re:Vote Ron Paul For President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also won't have to listen to that pesky Department of Energy drone on and on about how they secure all nuclear weapons and prevent warheads and fuel from showing up on the free market.

      Ron Paul is a senile idiot. Fortunately, he's not a dangerous senile idiot, because he doesn't have a whelk's chance in a supernova of being elected.

  22. There are lots of excel spreadsheets out there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several people who have posted excel spreadsheets. Some of them even work with open office.

    I've found them helpful for tax planning, but I still shell out $20 for tax act.

    For example www.taxvisor.com is pretty good.

  23. Tax preparation expenses are deductible. by el_smurfo · · Score: 1

    This is the sort of question only ./ ponders while the rest of us spend our $20 after rebate for a dependable program. I don't like Intuit, so have used HR Block for years with no problems at all.

    1. Re:Tax preparation expenses are deductible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax prep expenses are deductible IF they exceed ~$3000.

    2. Re:Tax preparation expenses are deductible. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Any such programs run on linux? or freebsd? or openbsd?
      Or is it actually $20 plus cost of windows or osx plus cost of compatible hardware?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Tax preparation expenses are deductible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do it online. You can run a modern browser on all those OSs.

    4. Re:Tax preparation expenses are deductible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a bunch that are web-based; that's the route I typically take.

    5. Re:Tax preparation expenses are deductible. by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      They are a misc.deduction, so must exceed 2% of your AGI to be deductible
      Unless you have lots of other misc. deductions, most people won't be deducting the $20 they paid for tax software.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  24. This is Mitt Romney's 2010 Tax return by Dainsanefh · · Score: 1

    Come see for yourself: (200+ pages, 8 MB PDF)

    http://thorndike.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Romney1040-2010.pdf

    --
    Twitter: @dainsanefh
    1. Re:This is Mitt Romney's 2010 Tax return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly--I'm no Mitt Romney (in SO many ways), but my tax return averages 75 pages now :( That's why I have to/choose to use a CPA.

    2. Re:This is Mitt Romney's 2010 Tax return by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how complicated a tax return he would have in the UK, but for most people it's either non-existent or very simple.

      There's an online tool (provided by the government). The paper form is 6 pages, but there's lots of space, guidelines and explanatory text.

    3. Re:This is Mitt Romney's 2010 Tax return by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Not sure this is the best example of how complicated the average US taxpayer's return is, my friend. ;) It's a terrific example of how we'd all like our returns to look, though.

  25. Government would love to give free tax software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Government would love to give free tax software but they have been fought every step of the way by the likes of Intuit and the tax software industry.
    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/08/02/1856215/Intuit-Still-Fighting-Government-Tax-Software

  26. Lots of free options for Canadian tax payers by Walking+The+Walk · · Score: 2

    I realize most of you will assume this question is USA related (I see the firehose story got tagged with "usa" quite quickly), but it applies to lots of other countries too. In Canada, we're supposed to use NETFILE certified software, most of which is free up to a certain income threshold. The Canada Revenue Agency has a list of all software certified for your 2012 filing (i.e.: 2011 tax year). Some of those same companies are probably certified by the IRS for filing taxes in the USA too.

    --
    A recursive sig
    Can impart wisdom and truth
    Call proc signature()
    1. Re:Lots of free options for Canadian tax payers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on that list is StudioTax which is completely free (no not open source, stop your whining) and does a great job. Actually, I should kick those guys a few bucks......

    2. Re:Lots of free options for Canadian tax payers by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious - I imagine you pay federal and provincial taxes, much like our federal and state taxes here in the US. If I'm correct, is your provincial tax preparation also free? For us, under a certain income threshold you can file your federal taxes for free with many software applications, but state taxes is where they getcha.

    3. Re:Lots of free options for Canadian tax payers by Walking+The+Walk · · Score: 1

      is your provincial tax preparation also free?

      Yes, most of the tax programs include both. There are some exceptions, where certain programs don't support some schedules (schedule = supplementary form.) e.g. StudioTax is totally free, but doesn't support schedule T1273 - the AgriStability / AgriInvest Programs. Since that's only for certain farmers, the majority of filers could use that software to prepare their taxes. As far as I know, filing in Canada is always free: either by phone, electronically, or by hardcopy snailmail.

      --
      A recursive sig
      Can impart wisdom and truth
      Call proc signature()
    4. Re:Lots of free options for Canadian tax payers by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

      Sigh. ANOTHER free thing in good ol' Canadia. I'm so expatriating some day.

  27. Tax Software could be open-source, but... by sohmc · · Score: 0

    TurboTax, et al could be made open source, but it there are major problems.

    While the major deductions haven't changed (e.g. mortgage, charitable contributions, etc), a lot of other stuff change, expire, get extended, year to year. While I would love to see a stable, open-source TurboTax, there is just too much at stake.

    When you install Linux on your computer, the overall cost is your system. If Linux somehow crashes and melts your motherboard, it sucks but you won't go to jail or get fined for it. Most, if not all open source software include clauses that absolve the authors of anything bad. Ultimately, you want to be able to say, "Linus Torvalds, that jerk, told me that I could claim my penis enlargement pills were tax-deductible!" and have the government hold him liable.

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
    1. Re:Tax Software could be open-source, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most, if not all software include clauses that absolve the authors of anything bad.

      FTFY

  28. Re:Calculations by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    IANAMM (I am not a Master's in Math). I find the calculations in tax law rather evil-hard. It's a different kind of hard that "higher math" - it's the numerical interlocks that are brutal. I'm rusty so I'm making this up as pseudo-taxcode, but stuff like the sentence below are typical *easy* tax law!

    "You own a rental building and rent 2 units out to tenants and live in the third. You bought the building first as part of a partnership then later acquired the whole thing, so your basis calculations are already a little strange. You run two small businesses out of your house. One of them qualifies for the Office In the Home forms. Your truck is 40% business one year and 60% business the other year because you have obligations that only arise every second year. Because you took accelerated depreciation on your truck, you cannot also take accelerated depreciation on some of your office in the home assets. For six months you also ran a day care service in that office-in-home. You are divorced but you won stock in the divorce settlement as substitute for alimony. That stock has split twice and then merged separately."

    Blecch.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  29. Value for money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really that big a deal to use a piece of commercial software? Depending on how complicated your taxes are it could be free, $50 or $75. That's really really cheap compared to using a CPA. I have three LLCs, an S-Corp with 60 employees and two rental properties. I use an accountant. I *wish* I could use a $50 package and do it myself.

    It seems to me like you are complaining about there being a very reasonably priced piece of mass produced software available that completely solves your problem.

  30. Because it's hard, duh! by Megane · · Score: 1

    First of all, I use H&R Block's software because they're not the "big guy" when it comes to tax software. And they have an OS X version. (although this year's version bitches at you if you're still running 10.4). I can usually find it at Fry's for $15 for the basic edition (I don' t have state income tax) if I pay attention and get it in January. And the E-File supports five filings from the code, so I can let my mom use it too (that's how I know about the 10.4 thing). (FWIW, they charge $10 for a single E-file if you don't have that code.)

    The main problem is that it's not a trivial problem, because Congress (aka "the opposite of Progress") is involved. I'm pretty sure that elected lawmakers are NP-complete. Or maybe NP-incomplete. And they are constantly changing things, sometimes for the sake of changing things. ("Hey, look! I'm doing something!") And this process is repeated in most states. (I live in Texas, one of the few that doesn't.) And maybe even one or two really big cities. So instead of just one tax code to worry about, now you have around fifty. Someone has to update that crap every year, and you would probably prefer it be someone who is paid to be responsible for doing it right.

    But whatever you get, remember to write down what it cost you so you can count it as a deduction for next year, assuming you do itemized deductions, which is where you really need good software. (If you're too young to have a mortgage, you're probably not going to have any benefit from itemized deductions.)

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  31. Does it have to be so complicated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's unfortunate that our tax law is so complex that we have to have complicated software or an accountant. While I'd like to have simpler taxes, I'll settle for moderately priced tax software that runs on linux. Tax time is the one time each year that I dust off my old Windows PC because neither HR Block or TurboTax will run under linux.

  32. StudioTax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have used [url=http://www.studiotax.com/en/main.htm]StudioTax (free)[/url] in Canada for the last several years and am quite happy with it

    1. Re:StudioTax by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Which reminds me, better get on with that :)

  33. Re:Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For most people it's not hard at all. It can be fairly difficult for businesses or when you have extraordinary things you can deduct from taxes, but for the vast majority of people the 1040-EZ form is sufficient. That's about as simple as what you see in Finland, if I had to guess. I have filled out German tax forms and the 1040-EZ is absolutely comparable It doesn't come pre-filled, but you get paperwork from your employer about your earnings where the boxes and fields are clearly numbered. You simply plug in the values - that's it. You'd hopefully be doing that with the Finnish pre-filled paperwork to catch any possible errors on their side.

    The topic is vastly overrated.

  34. Limited option: free online PDF forms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF you feel comfortable filling out tax forms directly and you qualify for IRS free file, there is Free File Fillable Forms [https://www.freefilefillableforms.com]. Beware it can handle addition but doesn't do any other thinking for you. Anyone can use this service to file a 1040, 1040A or 1040EZ - there is no maximum AGI requirement.

    That said, this may not work for the OP since it doesn't compete with TurboTax's services: finding and maximizing deductions, checking for errors and omissions, state returns, soothing graphics, etc, yada. And despite being no-cost, it is debatable how open the whole process is. For instance, it is an IRS website but the privacy policy directs you to contact the Free File Alliance, a "coalition of industry-leading tax software companies."

  35. Gratis tax software In Canada by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    For income tax in Canada, have a look at http://www.studiotax.com/en/main.htm. It's free as in beer, but I don't know about libre. WIndows only.

    -- hendrik

  36. The tax code should be DEFINED that way by alispguru · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An amazing amount of ambiguity and crap in the tax code would go away if the Government were required to publish a program in Java (probably best balance of portability, capability, and specification) and that program WAS the definition of the tax code.

    This would have the nice side effect of keeping lawyers who can't think formally (in the mathematical sense) away from tax law.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:The tax code should be DEFINED that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if, like often happens in MMO's, there's some bug that breaks the economy? You don't want the program to be the definition of the tax code; there has to be some provision for "it's illegal to exploit unintended bugs".

  37. Re:Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who owns a house is an idiot if they file a 1040 EZ.

    Since > 50% of citizens are homeowners, I would not agree with your assessment that "for the vast majority of people the 1040-EZ form is sufficient". For a large minority, possibly. But not for the majority, or indeed not the vast majority.

  38. If you want to use free software do your taxes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do them online at hrblock website using firefox on your laptop running linux

  39. Straddles by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    I am going to guess Straddles – a subclass of constructive sales. The IRS does not want you to effectively sells something this tax year and delay the payment for years. It used to be that one could delay taxes for years.

    Some of the regulations conflict with each other since they were written to stop specific transactions while not considering the whole situation. Others are vague on purpose, to discourage people from getting anywhere close – but it does leave professionals guessing.

    I have seen Tax Lawyers giving an opinion, and then disclaiming any responsibility for their opinion.

  40. GnuCash by yurikhan · · Score: 1

    GnuCash seems to have some tax-related features. Not being a US citizen, I never bothered to learn them.

    1. Re:GnuCash by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'm a newbie (or is that gnubie) to Gnucash, but while I might trust it to track my regular finances, I would not trust it for tax preparation.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  41. No market for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are so many government subsidized programs that allow people to file simple federal taxes, that this question rarely comes up. If H&R Block or TurboTax offers cheap tax preparation, then most people can and will use it. Even non profits that help prepare taxes typically use one of the commercial preparers. I think the government has done a good job of giving people several options to file taxes inexpensively or even free. It would be nice if some tax attorneys created a free open source method to help people file taxes, however it would require attorneys and accountants to volunteer a good amount of time, and come up with a product that does not infringe on commercial products. Oh yeah and you have to update it every year. It would be a cool project, but there is really no market for it.

  42. Re:Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same in Sweden. You get a pre-filled form sent out, and you can confirm it with a text message or over the net (where you can also make changes, but that mostly only applies for people who run private businesses).

    Why are they making individuals do all this work in the US? The state are going to check it anyway, aren't they?

  43. There's no sin in paying for something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I think the question is wrong. The real question should be "Is there any software that runs natively under Linux or maybe under Wine?" As many have said in this thread, tax software is complex and always changing. If the product were good and met your needs at a reasonable price, why not pay for something once in a while. I use mostly OSS on Ubuntu. However, I use Moneydance for my financial software because I find it is a good value and meets my needs. The fact that I pay a little for it doesn't make me a traitor to the open source community. I also use Vuescan in my photography work. I also paid for that with a one time fee. Those are the only two non-free packages I use. They both run natively under Linux and they are well worth the cost to me. But I use lots of OSS packages. And as a little acknowledeged point about OSS, how much do you contribute to the projects? Do you want a free ride in every aspect of your life? Come on, get real. Let's do what we can to get some commercial venture to develop their tax software for our chosen platform. Quit griping that everything in the world is not free!

  44. It's not needed by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

    People on /. are supposed to be smart. Doing your own taxes using the IRS forms and instructions is not that hard. I have done my own taxes (including schedules A, B, D) for many years now and I've never even been audited. People seem to be so terrified of being audited that they pay someone else for a service or software product just to make themselves feel better. It's the same damn data that your sending to the IRS. If that data is accurate there won't be a problem. Come on, people.

    1. Re:It's not needed by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      your = you're. I guess my joke was not far from the truth!

  45. US Tax Code is 5,296 pages. Pay the professional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you make a good amount of money and have investments etc., ask around to find a reputable professional and pay them. They know the tax laws, and the really good ones *enjoy* finding ways to save you money legally. Like someone else mentioned, you can deduct what you paid that professional on next year's taxes.

    US Tax Code is 5,296 pages long. Source: http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/04/09/150261550/why-congress-wont-simplify-the-tax-code

    Example of "exceptions to exceptions". Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/magazine/whats-the-easiest-way-to-cheat-on-your-taxes.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&ref=magazine

  46. Manufactured by unskilled labor by rpresser · · Score: 2

    I have a fantastic tax preparation system: Mark Frenchell. And the best part is it was built using a very small company of only two people: Howard and Josephine Frenchell.

    1. Re:Manufactured by unskilled labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he open source?

    2. Re:Manufactured by unskilled labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but are Howard and Josephine Frenchell continually making sure that your system is patched with the latest information and kept free from viruses? Has it ever just refused to start immediately? Or maybe just gotten so backed up you've had to work it out with a pencil?

  47. Ron Paul 2012 by Nogrial · · Score: 0

    Ron Paul 2012, end the Fed and you wont have to worry :}

    1. Re:Ron Paul 2012 by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in the ensuing economic collapse we'll have to revert to barter and that's harder to tax.

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
  48. Move to the 1st world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in Brazil, the gov provides a java app that runs fine on any system, works 100000x times better than turbo tax or any other system i've seem in the USA will ever dream to. It's one application that covers all cases, imports last year so you have to change very little year-to-year and you can compare everything in real time to decide over itemized or simple.

    i did my 1st tax here in USA yesterday. simply printed the forms (a huge chore since every link in the IRS website is a bait to paid services ... there's no free version for california residents unless you live under the state poor line for income) and got the same return as last year when ernest&young did a lousy job for me that costed a couple hundreds for my employer. They were so lousy understanding the laws for immigrants that they had to file an extension and could only complete that when a more senior guy showed up (after months) to do my forms.

    Everyone around me paid $50~$100 to a company that did the same job i did in 1h~2h. Plus they did most of the work, as MOST OF THE WORK IS COLLECTING data to send the company that will prepare for you. filling the forms (and reading instructions) was less then hunting my papers. ...i'm now having more trouble printing since i edited the damn forms in linux and now windows' adobe reader can't open the damn files and linux can't correctly send them to the printer. fuck printers. fuck adobe.

  49. It's already free! by jdastrup · · Score: 1

    Download the forms, read the instructions, and fill them out. Forms are free. What's the problem?

    Oh, you can't understand the instructions? Well, stop VOTING IN THE MORONS YOU KEEP VOTING IN OVER AND OVER AGAIN!

    The tax form should look like this:
    1. Income: _____
    2. Multiple line 1 by 10% (or some other percent...)
    3. This is your total tax: ______

    1. Re:It's already free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run my own business. Is the money I spent driving my car for the business a business expense, and therefore deducted from my income? Or do I pay taxes on that?

      OK, I have a home office. Is the money I spend on that office a business expense? If I sell my house for a profit, is that income? Do I pay taxes on that income? Is it all personal income, or since part of that house was for the business, is that business income?

      My business is growing, and I just bought a building for five million dollars. But, I took out a loan, and I'll be paying it back for 30 years. Can I write off that entire 5 million dollars as a business expense this year?

      Seriously, any time anyone says income is easy to figure out, it means that they're a god damned idiot. You're a god damned idiot, jdastrup.

    2. Re:It's already free! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      1) really it should just be collected as you consume (VAT/Sales)
      2) I'd like to see a refund at around the poverty line to let all the "wah, regressive tax" types to shove it (this should allowed to go to negative even, allowing for it to act as a micro-loan to potential entrepreneurs).

      point 1 is because in the US consumption is too high vs savings (savings rate was negative for a spell even), so taxing consumption should help that. Additionally it does not punish US corporations exporting, giving foreign companies an advantage selling here.

      The definition of income is not as simple as you appear to think it is.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  50. Re:Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citiz by alen · · Score: 1

    it depends

    if you have regular income, you rent a home/apartment it's easy. you just fill out the EZ form or do it online and file electronically. depending on who your paycheck provider is they will even import the income data.

    in the US we have lots of tax deductions for different things. student loans, child care, mortgage interest, buying specific cars, buying a home during a tax credit year, opening businesses in specific areas, stock and investment sales must be reported, interest and dividends have to be reported, and a thousands other things you may do will raise or lower your taxes during the year

  51. Certified Tax Software (for Canada) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're in Canada, it's probably best to use something off of this list: http://www.impotnet.gc.ca/sftwr-eng.html. While I don't see anywhere saying that it's open source, StudioTax is free.

  52. My government does my taxes for me by F69631 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, what is the obsession here with people wanting everything for free? You want to do your taxes for free, sit down with the paper form and do them.

    Where I live, the process goes like this:

    AT THE START OF EACH YEAR: The government send you your tax card. It tells you your tax percentage, etc. (based on assumption that you earn as much as you did the previous year). You take that to your employer, he pays the taxes directly from your wage and there is nothing more you NEED to do. If your income is very different than it was the previous year, you get taxed the wrong amount and the government sends you either returns or a bill at the end of the year. If you know your income has changed and don't want a large bill/can't give the government any money temporarily, you can fill out a simple 1 page (2 sides) form that they sent you with the card (or submit it online) and then they'll send you a recalculated tax card.

    DURING THE YEAR: Most people don't need to do anything. If your income changes a lot and you don't want to pay the government any extra (which they would, of course, return at the end of the year) or don't want a large bill, you can call them, visit an office or fill out the info online and they'll send you a recalculated tax card.

    AT THE END OF THE YEAR: They tell you that they want to either return some money (and ask you to inform them if your bank account number has changed) or they send you a bill. Again, you get a simple 1 page (two-sided) form (or can fill it out online) to tell them about anything that might affect the decision (such as having earned/lost a lot of money by trading stock or any similar things).

    For example, I got a bit better paying job last year but was too lazy to inform them so they now sent me a letter "You've earned more than we thought you would, so you've paid 790 euros too little taxes. Here are two bills of 395 euros, you have six months to pay the first and twelve months to pay the second. Here is a form you can use to complain if we've made any incorrect decisions." I might fill out the form because I've spent quite a few euros to buying stuff that indirectly helps me earn income (books to get certifications, etc.) and that sort of stuff is tax deductible. I don't expect to reduce the bill by a lot but it's going to take just 3 minutes or so, so why not.

    I've never understood why does USA have such a complex system that the government doesn't know how much they should pay taxes...

    1. Re:My government does my taxes for me by rmstar · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why does USA have such a complex system that the government doesn't know how much they should pay taxes...

      See? You trusted the government and now you look what a communist hellhole of a country you have to endure! Ever read the road to serfdom?

      On a more serious note, there is a lot about the US that nobody can really understand. I imagine in your country there is also a pretty reasonable health care system. Or - have you seen a paper cheque lately? Or, to reference a recent /. posting, you can probably block/unblock your mobile via a web interface. Etc.

    2. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has a simpler and better system than that for the vast majority of people. There is no extra step of requesting and waiting for the tax card at the start of the year.

      Where the US system gets complicated is when dealing with a lot of deductions or capital gains.

    3. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I make the assumption that you are European.Your European state tax is not equivalent with the US federal tax. At best, you would compare with a US state tax. US federal tax are complex because they apply for a federation of 50 states. Assuming your state is a EU state, just wait until EU will introduce its own taxes and we'll talk then (hint: see how "easy" the EU jurisprudence is to comprehend).

      Also, Americans are much more entrepreneurial. Many people have many other sources of revenue than just the salary. Rentals of real estate properties (in multiple US states), capital gains and dividends on the stock market, international taxes (Americans are taxed on the global income, not just the income realized in the US).

      There a lot of benefits provided in the form of tax deductions (child support, or interest on home mortgage, personal expenses related to your job, including expenses to search for a job, interest on student loans). These are an incentive for people to fill taxes so they can realize the deductions and receive a tax return.

      The taxes are really not that hard to do by hand, and for simple scenarios (employee, one job the whole year), they can be done with the pen and paper just reading the filling instructions. You need to put in some numbers and use the provided template to add or subtract. For most complex scenarios, is more effective to use an accountant of software, especially since you can deduct their cost from the taxes, and also have more assurance in the quality of the filling.

      Really is not a big deal. People just like to brag about taxes (anywhere in the world).

    4. Re:My government does my taxes for me by radtea · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why does USA have such a complex system that the government doesn't know how much they should pay taxes...

      Because the US federal system is completely broken, and has been for at least 50 years, possibly 100. It was intended to ride herd on a bunch of quasi-autonomous states (though not nearly so autonomous as they were under the Crown or the Articles of Confederation) and is now being used to maintain a world-wide empire.

      American libertarians almost make sense when you consider they deal with a completely broken system of government at all levels all the time. Because every government they deal with is completely screwed up, they think all governments are screwed up, and simply do not believe it when foreigners tell them how much better things are for us.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    5. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never understood why does USA have such a complex system that the government doesn't know how much they should pay taxes...

      Because the government doesn't fund everything, and spending money bettering the community sometimes means the government gets to collect more taxes from someone else. Now, this is a slippery slope that megacorporations exploit, but in essence it's volunteer government labor (since working for the government for no pay is illegal).

    6. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How do you account for additional non-payroll taxes? Do you own stocks or investments?
      Do you have any way to reduce taxes, such as charitable deductions? Reduction in taxes because income was already taxed elsewhere (foreign taxes, fees, etc)?
      If people do not have a pay stub how are they taxed, say they're retired or are individually wealthy?
      Do you have anything like tax free savings accounts or retirement plans, or is your entire future based upon hoping that pension plans in Greece will never reduce in value?

    7. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, what is the obsession here with people wanting everything for free? You want to do your taxes for free, sit down with the paper form and do them.

      Where I live, the process goes like this...

      Why don't you just say where you're living? Are you embarrassed or something?

    8. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my country, the employer deducts and pays your income tax, and sellers deduct and pay goods transference tax... even if you work as a freelancer, you can just tell whichever company you worked with to deduct the appropriate amount from the payment and pay the taxes to the government. Say, that's a lot better than having to write everything at the end.

    9. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this government that does all of this work for its own citizens for a remarkably simple tax system is none other than, "...

    10. Re:My government does my taxes for me by guises · · Score: 1

      The government does know how much you should probably be paying, if the amount that you do pay is very different from what they expect then they'll come after you.

      Obviously this means that the government could essentially do your taxes for you, as you suggest, and you would only point to whatever they got wrong or whatever additional deductions you want to claim. The tax preparer lobby has convinced members of congress that this would be unfair competition, however.

    11. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've never understood why does USA have such a complex system that the government doesn't know how much they should pay taxes...

      Public policy. The Federal government can't mandate what you purchase, but it can give incentives for certain behavior... and it does that through tax policy. Credits and deductions encourage people to buy homes, pursue higher education, give to charity, etc.

      There are also things like the AMT, but if you value your sanity it's best not to think too much about it.

    12. Re:My government does my taxes for me by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      Your country's system make too good of sense and sounds fair for all. This is totally unacceptable in the USA and will not be tolerated.
      Please list your country's name in the form below and the USA will schedule the next bombing run in your area.

      My country is ___________________
      My home town is ___________________
      The name of my next-of-kin is ____________________
      Where I want my body dumped after my untimely death _____________________
      Signed ____________________

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    13. Re:My government does my taxes for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, you don't pay taxes to the EU directly, secondly the US tax system is nuts.

  53. 1040EZ for the win. by yoghurt · · Score: 1

    It's not like 1040EZ is hard. It's only got like 10 lines - 4 of which are name and address. Really, it's just copy a few numbers off the W-2 and look it up in the tax table. Do a couple of adds and a subtract. Sign. Stuff envelope and put a stamp on it. It used to take me about 15 minutes to do my taxes when I could do EZ.

    If you can't do 1040EZ, I would suspect "freedom edition" wouldn't work either.

    --
    Yoghurt
    1. Re:1040EZ for the win. by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      She didn't qualify for the EZ due to retirement plan, capital gains and a couple other things but she was still able to use the Freedom Edition. I agree that if you qualify for the EZ, then there's no point in using software - free or otherwise.

  54. Just use your favorite web-based service. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    eztaxreturn.com has worked well for me for several years.

  55. PDF + Adobe Reader by vtTom · · Score: 1

    The OP said "I wouldn't really need a GUI, but something that filled out PDF forms would be nice." If you go to irs.gov, download the forms you need as PDFs, and open them with Adobe Reader, the boxes in the forms can be filled out within the software. Iit won't do any of the calculations for you, though, but at least it's a tad better than printing them and filling them out by hand.

  56. There’s public – and then there’ by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    You could file your taxes in the 1940's - where is was published in the local newspaper so everybody would know. Any early example of crowdsourcing law enforcement.

    You can send in the forms yourself - then only the IRS and you know what was filed.

    You can send in the info via Turbo Tax / H&R Block - Then another party konws. They are kind of limited to who they can share the data with, but.....

  57. Open source solution to filing . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the Open Source solution to writing tax software: Focus on repealing the 16th ammendment.

  58. Do it the open-source way by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Post your income, number of dependents, all of your Social Security numbers, real estate taxes and other deductions, etc. right here - the Slashdot crowd will do it all for you in the comments.

    It's basically analogous to how people repeatedly "Ask Slashdot" questions about legal matters.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  59. Magic The Gathering: Training the next generation by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    I would love that. Right now the company I work for uses a “conservative” interpretation of the tax code. With this would could specifically construct business transactions that would abuse any loophole. I mean, it's fair for Wizards of the Coast to update the rules to close loopholes found by Magic players - but it's harder for the IRS.

    Of course, I jest. Here is a great “ambiguities” in the tax code: If a transaction is primarily for tax reasons and not business reasons it’s disallowed. Great way to retroactively close abusive. On the other hand, I would like to see a bit more detail on constructive sales.

  60. Re:Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citiz by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 1

    Filing your taxes in the US is not complicated at it's most basic form. Applying every deduction, credit, interest payment, disbursement, etc properly and legally to minimize the tax you owe, or increase the tax refund/credits you should get, can become VERY complicated. There are literally hundreds of situations that can modify the amount of tax owed in either direction, and a great many of them are totally counter-intuitive.

    One can simply take the standard deduction and enter in all earned income data, but for many Americans that would leave thousands of dollars on the table, and for some Americans, it could actually get them in trouble or make them owe thousands more later on (filing self-employment income incorrectly, for example).

    It gets worse when you find these laws change every single year for various reasons (I have my suspicions but this is not intended to be a political post).

  61. why not interfaces and unit tests as definitions by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Truly open tax law shouldn't be expressed in words or software, but a set of interfaces and unit test definitions.

    In compliance with these definitions, the government would have its own implementation, TurboTax, etc would have their own.

    An open-source ecosystem would become truly possible (indeed, probable) - you wouldn't need to be a tax law expert to do an implementation, and you'd just have to tweak your code base every year to keep it up to date. Yes, it would be rather a lot of work at first, but you'd know it's correct when all the tests pass.

    Otherwise obscure but glaring corporate tax law problems would become regular talk on places like /., often bleed into the mainstream media. Politicians could get their names attributed via metadata to every test they approved in vote.

  62. Yankee grammar by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    "Open source solution or not, if you're a U.S. taxpayer, the deadline for filing is nearly to hand."

    Except that, if you're a U.S. taxpayer, you would instead say "the deadline for filing is nearly at hand." :P

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  63. Ask and ye shall receive by Taylor123456789 · · Score: 0

    Freefilefillableforms.com is an online tax preparation and efile service that is free. No income limitations and almost all 1040 related forms. I have used it for several years and it is great. You can save the return to your disk as a pdf. It computes the fields and does some basic error checking. It links to related forms and instructions. Easy to use GUI, almost too flashy sometimes. It does not store the data in any usable format, but that is fine for me because I do everything in Quicken.

  64. how the hell can you beat turbo tax? by spads · · Score: 1

    I have been using their online service for ~6+ years now, previously at the Premium level (~$50). This year I saw something pretty much unprecedented for an online services provider. They advised the Deluxe level (about half the price) for returning customers. (Note: they say that pretty much any version should be adequate for just about any normal user to fill out their forms correctly. They all have access to the same forms. The only difference is in the tools and menus that facilitate the data entry.)

    For the first time I made an error filling out one of the forms and had a smooth 2-stage process talking to their support (first technical, then tax) to correct it. At only $30 I still save about $270 compared to going to a professional, and have decent confidence. At that price I can justify it on the convenience of fairly mindlessly filling out e-forms (ie. as opposed to hard copy) alone.

    --
    Bukowski said it. I believe it. That settles it.
  65. Be sure to include.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...instructions as to where the government is to spend your tax dollar.

    This is the only way things are going to get straightened out and we'll take budget setting off their plate as they can't seem to do it anyway.

    This is a core solution that extrapolates out to solve many problems regard bad & corrupt government and corporate ties (lobbyist influence using money large corporations didn't pay in taxes - which is in sum a lot less than the people pay in taxes in sum). It also means you can participate in this Republic Democracy where it really matters, rather than voting for some politician to lie to you for their term. Taxation without representation is what the founders of this country were against when they created the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Representation is not a person that them lies to you, but representation is wheat benefits you can see and participate in.

  66. The phone based help by pigwiggle · · Score: 1

    isn't really that good - in my experience anyway. I had some questions about carrying over a loss from a passive activity that I was no longer doing. I called the IRS and was put in touch with the guy who, by his account, was "in charge" of that form. After I asked my question , he read the instructions to me. I outlined the part of the instructions I thought was ambiguous, and asked for clarification. He reread the paragraph, and then suggested I call a professional. The price of professional help would be on the order of the money saved by taking the carry over. So I dropped it.

    --
    46 & 2
    1. Re:The phone based help by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but if that guy from the IRS that you called for help gets it wrong, you are still liable for any penalties that accrue from following his advice.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  67. Umm, why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you an employee of the U.S. government? A resident of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or Guam? If the answer is no to all of the above, YOU DON'T HAVE TO FILE YOUR INCOME TAXES!! All of you have been tricked into thinking that you have to file since you where born! Did you know that if you do file that you are saying that you are from Guam or Puerto Rico? That you are committing fraud? Of course you don't, and the government and the IRS don't mind that you don't know and just give them your money anyways. If you don't believe me, then go ask your friendly IRS office the law where you are personally liable for Federal Income Tax. I'll let you in on a little secret, there isn't any law that make you liable.

    and if you care, take a look at this link...

    http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/BATF-IRS%20Criminal%20Report.html

  68. IRS should provide tax software for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't the IRS provide tax software for free?

  69. Testing, son, testing by davmoo · · Score: 1

    Another reason that you won't see open source software that will fill out your forms is testing by the IRS. The IRS *requires* that all tax preparation software be tested by them. If there were open source software that you could recompile, *every* time it was recompiled it would have to be sent in to the IRS and tested anew. Even if all you did was corrected a spelling error in a comment.

    It would be entirely possible to create free software, that runs on Linux even, to prepare your tax forms. It would simply have to remain closed source. But then almost the entire Linux community would rise up against it for being closed source.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  70. http://www.excel1040.com/ by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    http://www.excel1040.com/

    Free, works in open office, has been doing this for 15 years.
    Produced the same results as professional software.

    Probably not good if you have some new tax activity in your life until you see it done right once.

    I.e. "This year, for the first time, I'm doing my own taxes".
    I.e. "This year, for the first time, I started buying and selling stocks".
    I.e. "This year, for the first time, I started renting property to others".

    The form is there- but you have to know to fill it out and how to fill it out.

    I used it in Openoffice or Libreoffice and it worked great. I have a complicated return and have been doing my own returns for the last 15 years. This sheet made it much easier than doing taxes by hand. It took under 2 hours to do my taxes.

    Highly Recommended.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  71. Kickstarter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would totally support an open source tax initiative. I would pay up to $100 for it. If someone with a credible computer science background teamed up with a lawyer to do this on kickstarter, I would throw my money at them.

  72. You can be fined even when IRS owes you by ODBOL · · Score: 1

    This is personal experience, not speculation.

    I filed my 2010 taxes through TaxAct Online Ultimate Bundle (the version you pay a bit for and it includes a state return). I requested an extension, following the instructions associated with the software. The electronic extension request bounced for unclear reasons, and I was notified of the failure after the filing deadline passed. I resorted to a paper request for extension. I paid an overestimate of the tax I might owe along with the extension request. I relied on written instructions from TaxAct that the recorded attempt at an electronically authorized extension satisfied the filing deadline, and that the subsequent written request was proper even though mailed a day after the deadline.

    I heard nothing from IRS for months. I filed my final return well in advance of the extended deadline, and asked for a refund of my overpayment. I was assessed a huge fine, based on the total amount of tax that I had already paid on time, multiplied by the time between the deadline and the final filing.

    I appealed to TaxAct for help and they just referred me back to IRS. IRS had no comment regarding the instructions from TaxAct, although they had made special arrangements with TaxAct to receive electronic filings. IRS eventually forgave the penalties, with a letter saying that I was in the wrong, but they would let it go this time, and I shouldn't expect such leniency again for myself or anyone else.

    I still use TaxAct because the alternatives that I have tried are worse. I make sure that I have acknowledgment of filing before the deadline, and I have a backup plan to send paper copies on the deadline if I have not received acknowledgment.

    --
    Mike O'Donnell http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~odonnell/
    1. Re:You can be fined even when IRS owes you by Jeng · · Score: 1

      They thought you owed them money so they went for your ass.

      If they had thought they owed you money you would not have heard a word.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:You can be fined even when IRS owes you by ODBOL · · Score: 1

      They thought you owed them money so they went for your ass.

      No, they knew that they owed me money. They made it very clear that the penalty had nothing to do with the fact that they had cashed my check months ago. They credited my refund against the penalty.

      --
      Mike O'Donnell http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~odonnell/
    3. Re:You can be fined even when IRS owes you by ODBOL · · Score: 1

      If they had thought they owed you money you would not have heard a word.

      But you are right that I still haven't heard from the IRS regarding the large refund to my deceased father's account that they goofed up in direct deposit (while the state refund using the same information succeeded) for tax year 2009 (when he was still alive). The paid accountant, whom I will not name because they are about as good as others in the business, has done nothing effective to get the refund from the return which they filed for pay.

      --
      Mike O'Donnell http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~odonnell/
  73. Re:Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're assuming most homeowners pay usurious interest on their mortgages. I don't.
    I have a wife and four kids, and the only income is my job.
    Even though we tithe, the standard deduction is still twice what the itemized would be.

  74. Re:For this you want http://www.excel1040.com/ by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Free.
    Works in Excel, Openoffice, Libreoffice.

    I understand your points.
    This is a labor of love by a guy who's been doing it 15 years.

    For 90.35% of tax payers of average intelligence, who've had their return done professionally last year and have a copy, his spreadsheets are fine.

    The only time you need a professional is when something new starts like you start renting property or you start buying and selling stocks. In those cases, you might miss a sheet.

    Other than the statistical audit, unless you are really cheating hard, there is basically no risk of an audit if you are in the bottom 98% of income. The IRS has better things to do than have someone spend a couple days to nail you for a $47 error in their favor.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  75. Don't count on commercial "guarantees" by ODBOL · · Score: 1

    I paid for the TaxAct Ultimate Bundle, followed their instructions for getting an extension to the filing deadline, overpaid my taxes with the extension request, did everything that any of the software or correspondence directed, and got a huge fine from IRS. TaxAct declined to help in any way.

    I still use TaxAct for lack of something better, but I don't trust their instructions completely.

    --
    Mike O'Donnell http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~odonnell/
  76. A bit of correction by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    I think you missed my past tense usage. In the past, the amount of income tax you paid was public. Your right that today it’s private.

    I thought that this data was still published when the income tax was reintroduced in the 1940s. I am not so sure about that. On the other hand, when the Income Tax was first introduced in the in 1860’s is was public – just like property tax. NPR’s plant money had a nice little story on this.

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/03/23/149058446/from-abe-lincoln-to-donald-duck-history-of-the-income-tax

  77. In Canada at least by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

    Not open source, but free (as in Beer) is Studio Tax http://www.studiotax.com/ which is netfile certified

  78. I filed using paper by Skapare · · Score: 1

    I filed using a paper return, printed from their "fill-in PDF" tax form. So they still have to type it in.

    The issue for me is not how to prepare the tax form, or even the e-filing. The issue for me is having to use some corporation to do the e-file in a way that allows the corporation to see it. It's "not in an envelope" electronically unless it is encrypted with the recipient (IRS) public encryption key.

    Next year will be on paper, too, unless they fix the e-filing system.

    And tax software that runs on Linux is a plus. An open-source one is even better. But "direct e-file" would be the best.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:I filed using paper by kwoff · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same for me. I've wanted to file online for years, but each year I bail out as soon as I start.

      I live in the Netherlands for now, and taxes are so much easier here (and it's such a pain still having to file in the US; I've never found expats of any other country who have to file income taxes in their home country when they work abroad....). First, if you just get income from your job, there's nothing at all to do. The taxes are already paid, and you don't have to file a form (if you owe, I assume they'll send an "acceptgiro" invoice that you pay through online banking). I didn't realize that, so I filed it electronically: an application from the government site (though closed-source, I think), available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. The only annoyance was getting a digital ID for signing, but that was just a web form (with a private company...) and then waiting a few days.

  79. Completely broken by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Ahh yes the system is "completely broken." But somehow I get clean water from the tap. The roads are not filled with potholes. We have police and fire service as well. Schools with teachers check. What exactly is completely broken? What doesn't get done that should?

    1. Re:Completely broken by SendBot · · Score: 1

      Go ask any fresh high school graduate what Pi *means*, not the numerical expression of it, then tell me that schools aren't completely broken. The numerical illiteracy in this country would be shocking if it wasn't so ordinary. Do kids really need to waste that time in the broken schools to achieve such ignorance?

    2. Re:Completely broken by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      And we pay less for it than all of those foreigners. U.S. effective tax rates are much lower than just about any developed nation.

    3. Re:Completely broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, what? When I lived in Finland, I paid less on income tax than I would have in the US (quite a bit...22% vs. 35%). Of course, there was also a 22% VAT, but given a 9 (or 10%) sales tax in the US, I still don't think that adds up to more. Finnish education is also free until the Ph.D., and they have health care. So...which part of the US do you live in, again?

    4. Re:Completely broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in the HELL do you come up with your numbers? Where I live (in the real world) in the US my effective federal taxes is just over 9% (on $70,000 income), so adding in state taxes we are at 12%. As for sales taxes, I am in the most expensive area (Chicago) and we have 9.5% (and there is no such thing as Federal sales tax.) In some states in the country, these numbers are a LOT less (for example Florida has only a 6% sales tax and no income tax).

    5. Re:Completely broken by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      According to the OECD, U.S. tax revenues (federal, state and local combined) were 24.1% of GDP in 2009. Of the 34 countries they track, only Chile and Mexico collected a lower % of GDP in taxes.

      In the UK it was 34.3% of GDP.

      In Germany it was 37.3% of GDP.

      In Switzerland it was 29.7% of GDP.

      Everyone else in the developed world is paying MORE taxes than we are.

      Source:
      Spreadsheet: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/13/38/46721091.xls
      Other OECD data: http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3746,en_2649_34533_1942460_1_1_1_1,00.html

  80. Two Words: Man Hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm remaining an anonymous coward for a reason, but the reason there is no open-source software is simple man hours.

    My wife is a CPA, and her firm purchases sophisticated tax software for a reason. The company not only guarantees an up-to-date version every year, but also changes the software on a weekly basis and issues updates. A little known fact about tax-law. Sometimes the I.R.S. doesn't even publish the forms for filing certain returns until as late as January of the year they are due. Hell, sometimes the tax code for a previous year is not even finalized until the following year (e.g. the payroll tax extension that had to be renewed in February). And in spite of these bureaucratic delays, business returns are due March 15 in the U.S., and individuals are due April 15. These are firm deadlines that do not change (unless you file for an extension, but you have to ask for it or you don't get it). In other words, you have to have an open-source team that is dedicated to completely changing, testing, and validating tax software as the tax code changes, and doing so with a turn-around time measured in days or weeks sometimes. And to emphasize, the important part of that process is validation and testing since the numbers of one form feed into another form on another return and have material and cascading consequences.

    I'm not saying it's not possible to for an open-source team to accomplish all this. I'm just saying that unless someone is paying for the open-source team's time, it is going to be damn hard to accomplish. Further, the key requirements of tax software - testing and validation (the programming itself is rather straightforward) - are open source's notorious weak points. There is no extended beta-test here, especially since it is the user who faces civil and criminal penalties if the tax software spits out the wrong answer. It simply has to be perfect upon release, and that requires an extensive testing and validation infrastructure.

  81. why it is so difficult to do tax in open source.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take a look at this first: http://www.cs.amherst.edu/~djv/irs.pdf (what If the IRS had discovered the quadratic formula . . .)
    and then imagine the definition of quadratic formula change every year.

  82. Tax Preparation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a tax preparer, the IRS will hold you responsible for errors on the return. For example, if a single mom and her three kids come into your office with a W-2 for $16K, and you file her personal return claiming Head of Household and Earned Income Credit, and then the IRS determines the kids are really not hers, guess who is penalized? Correct--You, the tax preparer!. You should have know they weren't her kids! As a software developer, I made a stab at this last year. It's really too big a project for one or two developers, especially when the tax law is changed on December 15th and the app must be ready on January 15th. And the IRS requires they "certify" the software beforehand. As for tax simplification--it'll never happen. There are too many rice bowls that would have to be broken.

  83. Re:Is it really that complicated? (Am Not US citiz by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Part of the way the middle class reduce their tax burden here is by running businesses. I hardly know anyone here that doesn't have some kind of business operation because it allows them to get various tax advantages.

    Similarly the US likes to incetivize things through the tax code. I'm getting $53 because I put in an energy efficient door - in any other part of the world they'd just give that credit to the manufacturer and let the free market pass that through to the consumer, but for some reason that's not popular here.

    I lived most of my life in the UK, and it simply astounded me to land here. It also allows americans to bitch about how high nominal tax rates are when many people pay less than them.

  84. This reminds me... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    ...I need to call my CPA and make sure she files and extension for me....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  85. corrupt goverment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no open source tax software because the IRS won't accept returns from it. The IRS won't accept returns from it because the makers of the tax software have successfully lobbied congress to ensure themselves a corner on the market.

    If the open source community can write X, then I think they can manage tax software. The 0.1 version would be piss poor, but in 5 years it'd be better than anything else as people find ways to maximize it.

  86. Here is one option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.freefilefillableforms.com/

  87. I want a free as in freedom tax app not no-cost!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason people want a free app has nothing to do with cost. It has to do with freedom. I wouldn't use any commercial tax application because these programs are non-free and I can't use them on my free system. I also wouldn't use them because I'm not an accountant. The tax code in the US is COMPLICATED. I wouldn't ask slashdot for help with my taxes just like I wouldn't ask slashdot for help with my legal troubles. That said I WOULD contribute to free tax software that my accountant could use given that there were people working on such an application. Accountants don't use turbotax or taxact for tax preparation for a reason. All the people who think these are the "best" are sadly mistaken. The real experts use another program for which I'm unfamiliar and it costs a boatload. I think there is a yearly charge and then each tax return the accountant/tax person files costs $$$ too.

  88. After 15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just realized I'm the only one I know that uses linux. Except for the custom boot cd's i send my customers for troubleshooting, Linux continues it's race to irrelevancy on the desktop.

  89. The Nigerian Prince by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    A very nice Nigerian prince gave me some really swell tax software. It even electronically processed my over-payment.

  90. Let the IRS do it. by Yert · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly, I haven't seen this suggestion yet:

    Take it to your local IRS office, and ask them to assist you.

    Seriously.

    They are required, by law, to assist any taxpayer who asks for it - up to, and including, filling out all forms and checking them for accuracy (given you've brought in all the documents required). They cannot charge you for this service, and they are trained, every year, in what has changed in the tax code and what they should be looking out for.

    No, it's not software. Sorry.

    --
    Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
  91. Lobbying by snadrus · · Score: 1

    Efforts to simplify are stopped by huge lobbies. Lobbies also create the millions of loopholes that get rich "special interests" the discounts they want.

    --
    Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    1. Re:Lobbying by Graff · · Score: 1

      Lobbies also create the millions of loopholes that get rich "special interests" the discounts they want.

      Don't kid yourself, the poor "special interests" also get the discounts they want. It's the people in the middle that get screwed.