Slashdot Mirror


B&N Pulls Linux Format Magazine Over Feature On 'Hacking'

New accepted submitter super_rancid writes that issue 154 of the "UK-based Linux Format magazine was pulled from Barnes and Noble bookstores in the U.S. after featuring an article called 'Learn to Hack'. They used 'hack' in the populist security sense, rather than the traditional sense, and the feature — which they put online — was used to illustrate how poor your server's security is likely to be by breaking into it."

301 comments

  1. Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's because Linux is an OS used predominately by criminals to hack machines. I appluad Barnes and Noble for this responsible reaction.

    1. Re:Good for them! by phrostie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      since they still sell 2600 it'smore likely it has something do do with this:

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/04/30/1359214/microsoft-invests-300-million-in-nook-e-readers

      big surprise

    2. Re:Good for them! by Theophany · · Score: 5, Funny

      Using Apple is kind of like being one of the kids whose parents didn't tell them Santa or the Tooth Fairy wasn't real until they were 16.

      Using Linux is kind of like being one of the kids whose parents were alcoholics but did their best, in between drunken rants about the futility of life.

      I would finish this by saying using Windows is like being one of the kids whose uncle used to have special sleep over parties, but I'd definitely get modded flamebait. And I use Windows on my personal machines. And my uncle didn't touch me.

    3. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow.. really!?! I thought hackers used Linux because they cared about Freedom....

    4. Re:Good for them! by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Considering that their eBook reader runs a version of it...

    5. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Theo! There ya are boy! It's been awhile! Come give your Uncle some more sugar!

    6. Re:Good for them! by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      TFA states it was pulled "after a complaint" (note singular). I have trouble believing this is the only reason. They pulled all of them from all of their stores in America? I have trouble believing that a single complaint was the only reason. "Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity," goes the quote, and I think it applies here. If M$ were the reason then they'd pull *all* Linux stuff. Likewise if they wanted to pull every example of "how to do bad things" off their shelves they'd have to take a LOT of books down.

    7. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      predominately | adverb
      another term for predominantly.

    8. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it hve to do with that? They still carry other Linux mgazines in store.

    9. Re:Good for them! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Funny

      Using Linux is kind of like being one of the kids whose parents were alcoholics but did their best, in between drunken rants about the futility of life.

      Well, MY distro has the parents on methadone. It's clearly superior.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    10. Re:Good for them! by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      TFA states it was pulled "after a complaint" (note singular).

      Likely from a small town in Northwest Washington...

      I have trouble believing this is the only reason. They pulled all of them from all of their stores in America? I have trouble believing that a single complaint was the only reason. "Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity," goes the quote, and I think it applies here.

      True, but that's a whole lot of stupid going on...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    11. Re:Good for them! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WIndows is like being raised in Stepford.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Good for them! by tqk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Using Linux is kind of like being one of the kids whose parents were alcoholics but did their best, in between drunken rants about the futility of life.

      Well, MY distro has the parents on methadone. It's clearly superior.

      Ah, OpenBSD. Did you notice they just released their latest the other day?

      Using Linux is like being a one eyed telepath in a world full of blind people, and you smell funny, so they grimace at you when you pass them but they don't have any clue why they need to.

      [/.: "26 6 * * * /usr/local/bin/varnish_the_damned_cache_when_users_are_asleep"]

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    13. Re:Good for them! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      That's because Linux is an OS used predominately by criminals to hack machines. I appluad Barnes and Noble for this responsible reaction.

      Spoken like a true partisan hack!

    14. Re:Good for them! by tqk · · Score: 0

      predominately | adverb
      another term for predominantly.

      Must be a Murricanism then.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    15. Re:Good for them! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Considering that their eBook reader runs a version of it...

      Or used to. They made it hacker-resistant with the December OS updates, which true to form were only officially listed as "contains various minor updates".

      The next generation will probably run Windows.

    16. Re:Good for them! by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have trouble believing either the reason B&N gave, or your more sinister reason. My counter to both of them is contained in this link:

      http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/linux-hacking?keyword=linux+hacking&store=allproducts

      Which shows the result of typing "linux hacking" into the barnesandnoble.com search box. They sell literally dozens of titles on the subject of hacking and Linux, Some of which use the "tinkering with" definition of hacking, and others of which use the "breaking into" definition. I've seen many of these books in the physical stores too. This sounds like some management weenie over reacting to a complaint and little else.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    17. Re:Good for them! by tqk · · Score: 2

      WIndows is like being raised in Stepford.

      Truer words were never written. Good one.

      Microsoft: "We tried to be an Apple, but failed miserably, yet we wound up selling like hotcakes anyway. Go figure."

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    18. Re:Good for them! by DemonGenius · · Score: 0

      Why don't you have a seat over there?

    19. Re:Good for them! by davester666 · · Score: 2

      A single complaint to the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council got "Money For Nothing" banned across Canada. Yes, six months later, the decision was half-assed 'reversed', but this PC-shit is just crazy.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    20. Re:Good for them! by element-o.p. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was about to mention 2600, as well. WTF? They drop Linux Format because they published an article that tells you how to test your web server's security, but they still sell 2600?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    21. Re:Good for them! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have trouble believing either the reason B&N gave, or your more sinister reason.

      From the Linux Format website (issue 154):

      Learn to Hack
      Attack Servers, crack passwords, exploit services, beat encryption - everything you need to be evil. (Ben Everard)

      That sounds a little more nefarious than the summary implies.

    22. Re:Good for them! by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/predominately

      English
      Adverb

      predominately (comparative more predominately, superlative most predominately)

              in a predominate manner; predominantly

      Usage notes

      This is the adverb form of the adjective predominate, considered dated or non-standard, with predominant preferred. Likewise, predominantly is now preferred to predominately although the latter is 100 years or so older.

    23. Re:Good for them! by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 2

      well, the webpage shows better intent:
        "Attack servers, crack passwords, exploit services, beat encryption - everything you need to protect yourself from evil."

      But it amounts to the same thing. This information is out there. You should be learning from it and protecting your information instead of trying to censor it as some sort of apology of crime. Anyone who is interested in "doing evil" and capable enough to do so, will surely find lots of ways they can gather that information online or even from programming/networking books.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    24. Re:Good for them! by techoi · · Score: 1

      Isn't that typical...Had some mod points yesterday...Expired today...and then a post such as this. Mod Theo Funny!!

    25. Re:Good for them! by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's more like being raised in a Transformers movie - lots of glitz and shiny objects, but rather empty and pointless once you stop to think about it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    26. Re:Good for them! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      well, the webpage shows better intent: "Attack servers, crack passwords, exploit services, beat encryption - everything you need to protect yourself from evil."

      But the magazine cover says "everything you need to be evil."

      But it amounts to the same thing. This information is out there. You should be learning from it and protecting your information instead of trying to censor it as some sort of apology of crime. Anyone who is interested in "doing evil" and capable enough to do so, will surely find lots of ways they can gather that information online or even from programming/networking books.

      You are correct that the best way to learn to protect your servers is to learn what the attackers are doing to try to break in.

    27. Re:Good for them! by guspasho · · Score: 1

      I find this interesting. We should start a mass campaign to complain about to B&N about all these other books that teach people how to commit the horrible crime of hacking. Maybe they'll remove those too, or more pertinently they'll realize what a dumb move this was.

    28. Re:Good for them! by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      But the magazine cover [linuxformat.com] says "everything you need to be evil."

      I was aware. Before commenting, I read both your comment and the website's text and thought you had made a mistake but the image of the actual cover allowed the words "be evil" to be read beside the "censored" tag.

      Which is why I said the webpage showed better intent.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    29. Re:Good for them! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Quiet! Upper management don't know about that one yet.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    30. Re:Good for them! by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      Using Linux is like being a one eyed telepath in a world full of blind people, and you smell funny, so they grimace at you when you pass them but they don't have any clue why they need to.

      [/.: "26 6 * * * /usr/local/bin/varnish_the_damned_cache_when_users_are_asleep"]

      They probably grimaced because you haven't showered in over five days.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    31. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Linux is an OS used predominately by criminals to hack machines.

      No, this is because the magazine is in dire financial straits and this was the best publicity stunt they could think of.

      Walks like bullshit, looks like bullshit, smells like bullshit (magazine plummeting circulation, bookshop without moral agenda, gullible /. wreeda ).

    32. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On topic: Is it just me, or did the whole world get a lot more stupid on Monday? It's sure felt that way from here. What the hell is wrong with teaching people how to assess the security of their systems? That's Apple's job in this century?

      If you grow up in a walled garden, you expect anyone who didn't to be a potential threat.

      Funny that you feel the need to bring up Apple in response to an article by Linux specialists that tells people how easy it is to hack Linux servers. Yeah, it's obviously Mac users who are oblivious about security.

    33. Re:Good for them! by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

      I am happy I already have a copy. The Backtrack distribution they included was very nice indeed. Thanks Linux Format.

      --
      liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
    34. Re:Good for them! by pxc · · Score: 1

      This is fucking ridiculous. The Linux magazine selection at B&N is pitiful. I used to go to Borders pretty much exclusively while it was still open for that reason. Now Linux Journal doesn't do print. What good print Linux magazines are left? Are any available at B&N?

    35. Re:Good for them! by koogydelbbog · · Score: 1

      > But the magazine cover says "everything you need to be evil."

      actually it's "everything you need to be evil*" and there's a little box at the bottom with the footnote in it. can't quite make it out in that picture but it ends with "for self-defence only. Don't break the law!".

      that said, i did think it was an unwise choice when i saw it on the shelves in whsmiths. and this month's says "defeat the CIA" on the front of it (is about encryption), which is also asking for trouble.

      http://www.linuxformat.com/files/lxf_covers/158-big.jpg

    36. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my local Borders' stores, may they rest in pieces, pulled the UK magazines like Linux Format and Computer Music simply because they couldn't stop people from stealing the cover discs. I think I complained about this one too many times and they "took care of the problem" and stopped carrying the magazines.

    37. Re:Good for them! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I find the B&N action strange. The American Gun lobby says, Guns don't kill, people do. And the sad fact is that it is the bullet that kills.

      Guns don't protect. Look at the Zimmerman situation in Florida. Both sides are losers.

      So writing about Hackers makes everyone a Hacker, instead of learning how to protect one's website from hackers.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    38. Re:Good for them! by Sosarian+Avatar · · Score: 1

      Considering that their eBook reader runs a version of it...

      Or used to. They made it hacker-resistant with the December OS updates...

      No, B&N hoped it would be hacker-resistant, but the XDA devs released updates to their rooting methods (like ManualNooter) pretty quickly.

      --
      Apathy Sucks, Nobody for President!
    39. Re:Good for them! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Considering that their eBook reader runs a version of it...

      Or used to. They made it hacker-resistant with the December OS updates...

      No, B&N hoped it would be hacker-resistant, but the XDA devs released updates to their rooting methods (like ManualNooter) pretty quickly.

      That's why I said hacker-resistant rather than hacker-proof. If I can hack by inserting a bootable card and cycling power, that's an easy hack. If I have to spend a lot of time, go through several complicated steps, risk damaging my normal Nook account and config info and/or reset the device to originally-shipped factory conditions, that's a whole arena. One I don't like.

  2. Streisand effect in 3, 2, 1! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Odds are that Linux Format magazine is about to see an increase in circulation.

    1. Re:Streisand effect in 3, 2, 1! by tqk · · Score: 1

      Odds are that Linux Format magazine is about to see an increase in circulation.

      And B&N will be getting none of that. Funny how the world works. Classic exercise in shooting oneself in the foot.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  3. But... but... by klocwerk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say what?
    I used to pick up my copies of 2600 at a local B&N years ago...
    Sad.

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
    1. Re:But... but... by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but they cleverly named them "Reference you don't understand or care about" rather than "Pop culture meme that doesn't mean what you think it should mean.

      Name better, Try again.

    2. Re:But... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They still have them on the shelves. Not too long ago, they carried hackin9 magazine too. They have plenty of books on the subject as well. They even carry books on writing malware. But who am I to expect consistency and logic out of a corporation?

    3. Re:But... but... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Yep, my brother and I used to buy 2600 there and share it. B&N has always had a good supply of geeky materials.

    4. Re:But... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Share it? You might as well have stolen another copy!

  4. Pulled for false advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    With a title like "Learn to Hack" you're expecting instructions about chopping up things like bodies, not about poor server security.

    1. Re:Pulled for false advertising by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was a golfing tutorial. That's why I passed it by.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Pulled for false advertising by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      I bought a copy because I'm coughing incorrectly.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    3. Re:Pulled for false advertising by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I think it's obvious why they pulled it... they didn't want the competition. If ANYBODY could become a hack writer, what need would there be for stores like B&N?

    4. Re:Pulled for false advertising by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I thought it was going to be about learning to drive a taxicab. Or maybe how to write pulp fiction.

      I'm still piised off that the normals took our own very useful word and completely changed it, and we let them, damn it! Now what do we call someone who repurposes hardware or writes quick and dirty code?

  5. And yet by Alranor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They'll happily stock martial arts magazines, full of special features about new and exciting ways to hurt people.

    1. Re:And yet by mykroft42 · · Score: 2

      Heck they even stock 2600 which is essentially a whole magazine of such articles.

    2. Re:And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a full complement of magazines dedicated to medical marijuana. I couldn't believe how many the last time I was there.

    3. Re:And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's correct, they stock self-defense and physical exercise magazines. Those magazines don't talk about how to go out and find people to hurt.

      This was an article that started out explicitly stating how it was going to teach you to "attack passwords" and "break encryption" and such. If you want to blame anyone, blame Anonymous for keeping computer security in the news and causing this kind of crackdown.

    4. Re:And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one more reason to avoid B&N.

      Seriously, i get much better variety from the local used bookstore (Half Price Books) than the 'new content' that B&N is pushing. Insult to injury, the used bookstore has almost everything that B&N has anyways, short of Science and Engineering materials.

      I compare B&N to Starbucks. People go to the 'Buck' for over priced coffee, and B&N for over-priced literature.

    5. Re:And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one more reason to avoid B&N.

      Seriously, i get much better variety from the local used bookstore (Half Price Books) than the 'new content' that B&N is pushing...

      Good for you. Except for the incredibly obvious part where you wouldn't have used books if it wasn't for the people who bought them new.

    6. Re:And yet by zerro · · Score: 1

      do they not also sell many books and periodicals that have plenty of practical information about dark arts of finance, business, and legal domains?

    7. Re:And yet by tqk · · Score: 1

      That's correct, they stock self-defense and physical exercise magazines. Those magazines don't talk about how to go out and find people to hurt.

      Last I saw, they stock Soldier of Fortune and militia culture mags. Timothy McVeigh is at least an order of magnitude scarier than Linus Torvalds (no offense meant to Linus :-).

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:And yet by Spykk · · Score: 1

      You can't martial arts a big company, and nobody cares about individuals unless they are children.

    9. Re:And yet by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Borders would've done this. I miss Borders .. *sniff* ..my local BN kinda sucks for a BN.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    10. Re:And yet by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Wait: Starbucks started selling coffee? When did this happen? The last time I went to one they only seemed to sell coffee-flavoured milk.

    11. Re:And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they've always sold coffee, albeit somewhat burnt, and expensive - although not nearly as expensive as the flavoured milk, which is probably why they don't really over-sell it. It's up there on the menu somewhere, if you hunt for it.

  6. Freedom of speech? by jellomizer · · Score: 0

    Which US Law that is violating our first Amendment rights that would require B & N to take it down...
    Perhaps B & N is worried about something.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Freedom of speech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how stupid self-proclaimed "constitutional experts" are. Ron Paul voter, I assume.

    2. Re:Freedom of speech? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      B&N are free to stock or not stock whatever they want, whether or not anyone else thinks it's a good idea. Stop using "freedom of speech" as a synonym for "do what I say".

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  7. Wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with hacking? Just because one or two people may use hammer to hurt others, doesn't mean all shops should be banned from selling them.

    1. Re:Wtf? by tqk · · Score: 2

      Just because one or two people may use hammer to hurt others, doesn't mean all shops should be banned from selling them.

      I just used that same thing at the dinner table last night defending computers in general. You can use a hammer to build a house or to bash in someone's head. It's just a tool. If they couldn't find a hammer, there's lots of other tools they could find that would suffice. Al Capone liked baseball bats, according to the movie.

      P. S. I like baseball bats too. That doesn't mean I want to bash anyone's head in.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Wtf? by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's about pragmatics. If an item has an almost exclusive illegal use then it can make more sense to ban it outright. This can be contextual too (e.g. guns in capital cities versus rural areas). How often this occurs depends on whether your society is more idealistic (e.g. U.S.) or more pragmatic (e.g. Europe).

      Computers, though, are so amazingly useful in so many legal situations that I'm surprised anyone could argue for them to be banned.

  8. I'm shocked, SHOCKED to hear there's gambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wait, a company has a virtual monopoly on brick and mortar book stores and suddenly doesn't feel any pressure to carry a product like this, since no one can go down the street and get it from a competitor? Get out of town....

  9. 2600 by GryMor · · Score: 1

    That is really odd, as my local B&N was still carrying 2600 last time I was in, and there are similar articles in every issue.

    --
    Realities just a bunch of bits.
  10. US$300M effect? by jbernardo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could it be that the buyout of B&N by Microsoft has produced the first victim?

    Or just a "unfortunate coincidence" that the magazine censured over a word is a Linux magazine?

    1. Re:US$300M effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was no buyout.

      B&N spun off a subsidiary (which doesn't handle this sort of thing) and Microsoft took a minority stake in that subsidiary (so even the subsidiary was not bought out).

    2. Re:US$300M effect? by tqk · · Score: 1

      Or just a "unfortunate coincidence" that the magazine censured over a word is a Linux magazine?

      I love a good conspiracy theory, but it feels like this has a lot more stupid/dumbth involved (since 2600 is still allowed) than it does evil/malevolence. However, that could just be me.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:US$300M effect? by jbernardo · · Score: 1

      Or just a "unfortunate coincidence" that the magazine censured over a word is a Linux magazine?

      I love a good conspiracy theory, but it feels like this has a lot more stupid/dumbth involved (since 2600 is still allowed) than it does evil/malevolence. However, that could just be me.

      Hanlon's razor says you are probably right. However, it still is an interesting coincidence, coming right after the news that Microsoft had bought B&N silence in the android patent trolling case.

  11. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember what happened last time, Redcoat.

  12. Read the 1st amendment first. by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    No it's not. If a government agency had tried to force them to take it down, that would have been a case of infringement. But as a private entity, B&N can decide what to carry in their product line.

    1. Re:Read the 1st amendment first. by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I just subscribed to Linux Format.
      NOT through B&N.
      Keep-up the good work and soon you'll be like Circuit Sity.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Read the 1st amendment first. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or RTFA? This was in the UK, not the US.

  13. Which is in contrast how exactly to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2600, the Hacker Quarterly, which it has carried for at least a decade?

  14. Example why brick and mortar bookstores dying by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In an age where brick and mortar bookstores are no longer the most economic method to deliver printed matter, and where the needs and desires of consumers can be far more fully met online, needlessly exposing yourself to ridicule and consumer anger is not a good business strategy.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:Example why brick and mortar bookstores dying by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      If this was the reason why brick and mortar stores are dying, Amazon would had been bankrupt by now due to their censorship of "adult material". Not to mention Apple.

      No, brick and mortar is dying because we are too lazy to drive to buy stuff, we can just pay to download or have the mailman bring us our orders.

      Mind you: not saying I agree with this at all, just noting that it's not at all the reason they are dying.

    2. Re:Example why brick and mortar bookstores dying by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

      The sad thing is that the consumer anger is what caused it - this whole thing is due to a complaint.

      I used to work for a UK bookshop who had a very forward looking view on things - if it wasn't illegal, they'd sell it if there was demand. We had complaints from the local university's Jewish Society about the fact that we sold Mein Kampf, which is not only legal but on several reading lists. The response was a more tactful version of "would you like us to make a big pile and burn them?"

      There's plenty of reason to "hide" distasteful material, we had one customer who would regularly order books which most people would find politically/historically unpleasant (and are illegal in Germany), and we would order them in - they wouldn't be on the shelves though. A sensible response from B&N would have been to remove the magazines from the shelf and replace them with a sign saying "due to customer complaints about the content of this month's Linux Format it has been removed from the shelves, please ask a member of staff if you require a copy", and then sit back and watch the sales soar.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    3. Re:Example why brick and mortar bookstores dying by jc42 · · Score: 1

      No, brick and mortar is dying because we are too lazy to drive to buy stuff, ...

      Well, most of the stuff I've ordered from Amazon isn't even available in any nearby bookstore. There were even some good technical bookstores around here, near the universities, 15 years ago. But when I called them asking if they had a book in stock, they usually said "No, but we can order it for you." And I usually replied, "Thanks, but I can order it from Amazon myself just as easily, with no chance of something being heard wrong over the crappy phone line and me getting the wrong book."

      Eventually, I gave up, and just ordered everything online, sometimes from the publisher if they had a usable web site, or from Amazon if they didn't.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  15. 2600 Magazine? by adenied · · Score: 1

    I used to go to Barnes and Noble to buy 2600 Magazine because it was the only place in town that carried it. This was in the Midwestern US in the mid-1990s. I guess times have changed (OK I know times have changed).

    1. Re:2600 Magazine? by sir+lox+elroy · · Score: 1

      Actually they still carry it.

      --
      Kosh: "Understanding is a 3 edged sword, your side, their side, the Truth."
  16. Of Course they did! by CajunArson · · Score: 0, Troll

    B&N simply cares about not allowing FUD to be sold in its stores! The banned article is obviously M$ sponsored FUD because it says that Linux boxes can be hacked, which all of us Slashdot users know is physically impossible because of the OSRGF (Open Source Reality Generation Field). I mean it's simple physics: somebody could read the Open Source code and find bugs. Multiple universes exist where all bugs are found. Therefore, all bugs are found, fixed, and patched automatically, making it impossible to hack Linux. Watch some more Star Trek and learn your physics people!

    I applaud B&N for taking a stand against the spread of M$ sponsored FUD like this.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:Of Course they did! by tqk · · Score: 1

      Mods, please take your meds. This was modded Troll?!? It's Funny, ffs!

      By the way, I'd also like to mention here that my brother in law was Marina Sirtis' personal assistant last week during the Comiccon here. I am so proud of him. I hope she had a lovely time.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Of Course they did! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Multiple universes exist where all bugs are found. Therefore, all bugs are found, fixed, and patched automatically, making it impossible to hack Linux.

      Hey, Hush!! We don't want Earthlings to know about the interuniversenet. They'll all want to use it, and then the comm system developed on Earth will be obsolete and all the phone and cable companies will go out of business. We wouldn't want that, would we?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  17. Graded: Incomplete by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    They missed 2600. The b&st@rds.

    When they pull that, I have -1 reasons to go to B&N. And since they bought my data from Borders and spammed me immediately, I've been a little peeved at them. Now I can explain to the wife how buying books at Amazon isn't hurting the local seller. The local seller is well capable of hurting itself.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Graded: Incomplete by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      They missed 2600. The B&Nst@rds.

      FTFY

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:Graded: Incomplete by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I had a membership there (BN) for a year, didn't bother to renew. It really wasn't worth the $25 to join, IMO. I don't buy many hardcovers or best sellers, which get the greatest discounts. Contrarily, I'd get a %25 to %40 off coupon every week from Borders, with free membership, for any book in the store, and use it. Maybe BN thinks being the lone surviving brick 'n' mortar store gives it extra clout but they're underestimating Amazon, IMO, who I'd rather buy from.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:Graded: Incomplete by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I'm not paying to go buy stuff. They are lost.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:Graded: Incomplete by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I was given the option to electronically opt out of the dataset during the Borders buyout process, took it, & haven't had any subsequent B&N spam.

  18. Who still buys dead tree computer magazines? by couchslug · · Score: 0

    Yes. Really. I wouldn't want them if they were free. Waste of paper which I would have to haul off, not backlit, can't copy/paste or link to content, etc.

    I'm certainly old enough to miss dead tree media. I don't, though I use junk snail mail to line the bottom of my bird cages.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:Who still buys dead tree computer magazines? by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want them if they were free ... not backlit ...

      Not to be rude, but what cave are you reading magazines in that doesn't have sufficient light to read a magazine?

    2. Re:Who still buys dead tree computer magazines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do. They accept a level of abuse which would kill every electronic device.

    3. Re:Who still buys dead tree computer magazines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of circumstances in modern life where a backlight is useful.

      E.g. 1: Some long-haul city buses dim their interior lights at night, especially towards the front, which makes it hard to read printed material.

      E.g. 2: You like to read in bed but your partner can't go to sleep with the bed-side lamp on.

      Sure you could mess about with a pen light or a head-mounted light... if you lived in cave. But for us modern people, a backlit reader or pad is much more convenient.

      Free advice... Try to live a little and gain a sense of perspective so you won't make yourself ridiculous trying to ridicule others, hm.

  19. Left wing nuts! by TokyoMoD · · Score: 0

    what a load of BS!

    1. Re:Left wing nuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Left Wing"?!?

      I don't know about that. This sounds pretty fascist to me which makes it Right-Wing-Law and Order-Republican type of bullshit.

  20. The June Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until they see the June issue... Headline: "Beat the CIA"

  21. 1337 by Sav1or · · Score: 2

    So how many different definitions of the word 'hacker' is there now, 1337? Seriously though, I'm sick and tired of all the mystery and ignorance surrounding the subject.

  22. Way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just lost all of my future business. Linux Format is my favorite magazine, and I am disgusted that I ever bough anything from Barnes & Noble after they did something like this. Goodbye B&N, hello Amazon!

  23. Next issue: Rooting the Nook? by tekrat · · Score: 1

    I suggest Linux Format Magazine picks up the pace. They should feature a "hacking" article EVERY ISSUE.

    In fact, I'm thinking about going into publishing a HACKING magazine right now. With Blackjack and Hookers....

    2600 magazine rules that niche, but maybe with something like "HACKING" right on the cover, they'd give me lots of free publicity by pulling it.

    BTW: How is it that they carry MAKE magazine? Technically, that's hacking as well...

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Next issue: Rooting the Nook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Forget the hacking. And the blackjack.

  24. They prefer that customers buy by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Interesting

    less dangerous reading material that has hurt no one.

    1. Re:They prefer that customers buy by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Funny

      Crap. I just violated Godwin's Law, didn't I?

    2. Re:They prefer that customers buy by saveferrousoxide · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, no. Quite the opposite. You lent further proof to it. :)

  25. Beat the CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think it is actually because the cover says "Beat the CIA" rather than learn to hack... well at least it does in the UK!
    the tag line is "keep everyone out with our ultimate privacy guide"... I imagine thats the reason why, not a little tutorial. Governments don't like being reminded...

  26. Dear Barnes and Noble by SecurityGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop being stupid.

    I cut my teeth on articles about "hacking". I've used "hacking" tools going back to the one that got Dan Farmer fired, and before. My interest in security was sparked by downloading an exploit for the Solaris eject command. Download, compile, omg! Root prompt!

    The catch? I did all those things on boxes I was paid to secure. I've never broken into anyone's systems but my own, and I have legitimate rights to do that. Information is information. It's not "good" or "bad". I have a bookshelf full of books, mostly bought in your stores, that could teach you how to "hack" or how to secure systems and networks. Guess what I've been paid to do for going on 20 years?

  27. Did they not learn..... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    From the 2600 lawsuit? a few years ago B&N was refusing to carry them in the stores, and 2600 sued them, or at least threatened to and they put them back.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Did they not learn..... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      The first 100 hits from

      https://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q=%22barnes+and+noble%22+%222600%22+%22lawsuit%22

      don't mention anything about lawsuits, threatened or otherwise, from 2600 to B&N.

  28. How to hack an hamburger: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [censored]

  29. Re:Meanwhile... by Norwell+Bob · · Score: 1

    I thought China was our majority debtor.

  30. This deserves a big WTF??? by Angrywhiteshoes · · Score: 1

    They sell 2600, I know because I buy it there.

    1. Re:This deserves a big WTF??? by Angrywhiteshoes · · Score: 2

      http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/d2600-magazine-2600-magazine/1108150347?ean=2940013699236

      http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/hacking?store=ALLPRODUCTS&keyword=hacking

      Man, I don't get it, there must be more to it than just "omg, they are legionz PULL ALL THE THINGS!!!!!"

  31. I don't have a subscription to Linux magazine... by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    ...but I am going to get one now.

    Unacceptable... a bookseller doesn't have the right to assert opinion in this manor.

  32. Populist security sense? by sycodon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They used 'hack' in the populist security sense

    WTF is that?

    To 99% of the world, a hacker is someone who steals your password, your money, puts kiddie porn on your computer and publishes all your email.

    Like it or not, folks doing legitimate security assessments or building custom gadgets, etc. would do well to come up with term other than "Hacker".

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Populist security sense? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      they screwed up the meaning not us, why should we come up with a new term because they are computer illiterate.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:Populist security sense? by QuincyDurant · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Ninety-nine percent is a bit high, but my dictionary and others say that it means to break into a computer illegally. The AP Stylebook, which governs most media coverage, says the term "hacker" "has evolved to mean one who uses computer skills to unlawfully penetrate proprietary computer systems."

      Since the meaning of "hack" has evolved, or at the very least is evolving into this negative sense, automated computer systems flag it.

      Maybe the magazine can contact a live person. Or find a different word although I'm not sure what it would be.

    3. Re:Populist security sense? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly!

      I'm a CRACKER not a hacker. Get it right. (No just kidding..... but I should post that on news sites just to see what reaction I get.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Populist security sense? by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can't argue with market realities. You can be smart. rebrand yourselves and build that brand in a respectable manner, or you can be a stupid 10 year old and throw a tantrum and still be associated with spammers and thieves.

      Your choice.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    5. Re:Populist security sense? by Imrik · · Score: 1

      My interpretation is that they used 'hack' the same way you do rather than the traditional sense meaning something more like building custom gadgets.

    6. Re:Populist security sense? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah, I see you're a Linux Kernel Developer. "I am technically correct, so I don't have to listen about usability."

      Here's an example: swastika. Immediately, you're thinking of 40s era Europe, right?

      The Germans used the swastika for 6 years. It's been around for THOUSANDS of years as a Sanskrit symbol, but you put up one little flag and point at it with your arm and suddenly YOU'RE the bad guy.

      Sycodon is right, a new term has to be coined, and not hat colours.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    7. Re:Populist security sense? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Hacking riding a horse for pleasure

      I'm going hacking = I am going horse riding

      Depends on the context and who you are speaking to what it means ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    8. Re:Populist security sense? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Being self-righteous about it wont prevent people from misunderstanding you. You have two options:

      * Deal with it
      * Be snooty about it, and continue to wonder why people get the wrong idea when you say "hacker"

    9. Re:Populist security sense? by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AP Styleguide? One set of idiot reporters telling another set of reporters how to speak about technology the 1st set does not understand. Talk about the blind leading the blind.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    10. Re:Populist security sense? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Informative

      The new rebrand is "Security Researcher". I haven't seen that get culture-broken yet.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    11. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To quote Office Space, "why should I change my name; he's the one who sucks."

    12. Re:Populist security sense? by element-o.p. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...why should we come up with a new term because they are computer illiterate.

      Because you don't want the computer illiterate to confuse you with someone who is doing something illegal?

      Language changes; you can change with it, or you can be frustrated all the time because people misunderstand the term you choose to use to describe yourself.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    13. Re:Populist security sense? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      as Shakespeare said A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, it the same thing. changing our name which when used by us is a term of respect, would changing our name change what we are? we are still the same, unfortunately the negative connotation that the outside world has for us would fallow to the new name mostly because we are an under valued hated but necessary part of the modern world. without us the world around us would slow to a halt because it is all built off of computers and networks only we understand people hate their computers and device and but love the benefits. hackers are the people that make them work. they know that and see us as a necessary evil. we just make it go like they want but scare the hell out of them with our jargon and technical terms. we scare them because rouge members of our society the crackers can so easily get around their feeble uneducated security measures. they however do not see the difference between the cracker and the hacker and we get the blame get used to it. we should however keep our name because it will fallow us anyway as will the reputation.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    14. Re:Populist security sense? by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

      True, but since the goal of language is to facilitate communication, you would be wise to understand how most other people use the word. Face it, who is Joe Consumer going to listen to -- you, or CNN? If that is how the word is being portrayed in the media, you and I have the proverbial snowball's chance of changing the public's perception of that word.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    15. Re:Populist security sense? by khr · · Score: 2

      At one time a "computer" was a person. But that word has evolved as well...

    16. Re:Populist security sense? by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      Script kiddies screwed up the meaning, taking open source hacks from repository and going out to destroy every computer and deface every page they can, all in while calling themselves also "hackers."

      For every "old school" hacker, there are about 20 script kiddies. Since they outnumber the legitimate hackers, and they call themselves so... well... it IS a democracy. They took it. It's theirs. Hacker is now synonymous with idiotic kid that does illegal computing activities.

    17. Re:Populist security sense? by pla · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You can't argue with market realities. You can be smart. rebrand yourselves and build that brand in a respectable manner, or you can be a stupid 10 year old and throw a tantrum and still be associated with spammers and thieves.

      Or, you can just not give a damn what Joe Sixpack calls us, since he won't understand it no matter what clever names we come up with. We hear about just as many whitehats going to prison (if not more) for pointing out the gaping holes in security, as we do blackhats for quietly exploiting those holes.


      Your choice.

      Okay, I'll take "Your Foamy Lord and Master", then.

    18. Re:Populist security sense? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Godwin? Is that you?

    19. Re:Populist security sense? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      You know, by Sheakespeare's time capitalists were marginalized. They were talked down by both the elite and the poor, they were only accepted because people wanted the stuff they brought to the cities. In France even their name (bourgeois) made it explicity they didn't belong to society.

    20. Re:Populist security sense? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      as Shakespeare said A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, it the same thing. changing our name which when used by us is a term of respect, would changing our name change what we are? we are still the same, unfortunately the negative connotation that the outside world has for us would fallow to the new name mostly because we are an under valued hated but necessary part of the modern world. without us the world around us would slow to a halt because it is all built off of computers and networks only we understand people hate their computers and device and but love the benefits. hackers are the people that make them work. they know that and see us as a necessary evil. we just make it go like they want but scare the hell out of them with our jargon and technical terms. we scare them because rouge members of our society the crackers can so easily get around their feeble uneducated security measures. they however do not see the difference between the cracker and the hacker and we get the blame get used to it. we should however keep our name because it will fallow us anyway as will the reputation.

      Hmm... this reminds me of the word "gay". Are you gay right now?
      ("rouge members of our society" indeed)

      Face it: words change their meaning. At one point you would have challenged me to a duel for calling you "nice". That's not a fallow observation.

    21. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nigga, please

    22. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it or not, folks doing legitimate security assessments or building custom gadgets, etc. would do well to come up with term other than "Hacker".

      doing legitimate security assessments = Security evaluator
      building custom gadgets = Tinkerer

    23. Re:Populist security sense? by rezalas · · Score: 1

      Yes the novices will go to prison and learn from the experts everything you could imagine about exploiting holes.

    24. Re:Populist security sense? by rezalas · · Score: 1

      Look into any forum, bbs, email chain, web server, or telnet session, and there you will find him.

    25. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going by your logic Rick Santorum should have changed his name ...

    26. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me see if I got your thought process right.

      A few people invent a word (which they got from something else meaning to cut up wood). It gets re-re-borrowed and turned into something else and your upset about it? Yet they should all change to match your meaning because they are *all* wrong.

      It is an interesting bit of computer history. But nothing more than that at this point. Its changed. Time to move on.

      Even in the programmer sense hacks are usually NOT good things. You usually hear 'i hacked this together but will fix it later'. It usually means I did something quick and it will probably break. So in other words you want to be a 'hacker' in the MIT sense means you want to bash crap together and hope it works and maybe does something cool.

    27. Re:Populist security sense? by wiredog · · Score: 2

      Racist...

    28. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry that's just dumb...as George Bernhard Shaw put it "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

      It is not being a 'stupid 10 year old' to insist on the proper use of words, especially when it's the ones who invented the word asking for it to be used properly.

    29. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernhard Shaw

      You go right ahead and continue to be a 'reasonable man'...thanks for sharing in progress.

    30. Re:Populist security sense? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Because they get to redefine the language and you don't. Never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel, or bandwidth by the gazigabyte.

    31. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and "gay" used to mean, "happy." Get over it already.

    32. Re:Populist security sense? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      rebrand yourselves and build that brand in a respectable manner

      I am not a brand, I am not a commodity, I am not something that is being advertised. Why should I care about what people who would not write a program to compute 2+2 think about the word "hacker?"

      Hackers have every right to criticize the media's use of the term and the media's portrayal of "hacking." If ignorance is not criticized, it will propagate.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    33. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, and change arched arms to point the opposite direction, of course.

    34. Re:Populist security sense? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, and interestingly enough, this is a tangetial example of names being used incorrectly.

      Godwin's Law is not _any_ mention of Hitler or the Nazis. It requires an unfavorable comparison to Nazi Germany or Hitler. Since nothing we've done is as bad as massacring 12+ million civilians, the comparison is ridiculous. Further, the rule is "any flame war shall eventually result in somone comparing someone else or their actions to Nazi Germany. That person loses."

      Examples are: "The Nazis had really strict rules about this too!", "You imagine yourself a little Hitler with parades and... and... people saluting you", and, "You know who else liked to invade Poland?"

      In other words, you can talk about The Luftwaffe, Swastikas, Panzer design, WW2 re-enactments, etc. without invoking Godwin's Law.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    35. Re:Populist security sense? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Nah... give it another 50 years and maybe the swastika can be reclaimed. It's already making a comeback with Asatru groups and Odinists (it was well known among the Saxons and Vikings too). Or maybe I'm being too optimistic.. Eliphas Lévi was basically the first to associate the pentagram -but upside down- with Satanism, the pentagram being another ancient symbol with an originally positive connotation, and thus stained it. Wiccans and pagans are doing their damnedest to reverse that.. we'll see how that goes.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    36. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every "old school" hacker, there are about 20 script kiddies.

      I think they're called "web developers" now.

    37. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you're talking about the same class of people that brought you fine software like The GIMP, BitchX, and Damn Small Linux and terms like RTFA/RTFM right?

      Marketing, social skills, and branding are not the strong suite of these people. They care far more for coding and functionality than they do about offensive terminology (gimp is to disableds as nigger is to blacks), clarity (BitchX is an IRC client. How does BitchX convey that? At least GIMP is an acronym.) and presentation (None of these are acceptable to say in front of a customer.)

      They might be fine programmers, but their social understanding is symlinked to /dev/null.

    38. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nigger and African American mean the same thing right? Faggot and Gay? Atheist and heretic?

      The problem is that the media calls both roses and a turds the same thing, hackers. The "roses" need to rebrand and continue being "just as sweet". Let the turds be called hackers, it's a shitty term anyway.

    39. Re:Populist security sense? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      It's more like, "Pick your battles." I'm okay if you choose to pick different battles than I do, however.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    40. Re:Populist security sense? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Actually, as an atheist I'd like to think of myself as a heretic as well.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    41. Re:Populist security sense? by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if we started coining the term "hacker++" (to indicate the fuzzy and lovable hackers), it would amend the fundamental flaws of our language choices?

    42. Re:Populist security sense? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Ooh, and we could then add "hacker#" a few years later! ;)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    43. Re:Populist security sense? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      No mod points, but +5 damn you nailed it.

    44. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to most people "cracker" means something else...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracker_(pejorative)

    45. Re:Populist security sense? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      But see that's the thing about the pentagram. The symbol with positive connotations has a single point at the top, the satanic one has a single point at the bottom. Like the swastika, the ancient symbol is made up of horizontal and vertical lines, the mid 20th century corruption of it has all the lines at 45 degree angles.

      A classic example of the correct use of the swastika in WW2 was by the Finnish air force.which used a swastika the correct way round. Sure they were allies with the Germans for a while, but only out of neccesity. When the Germans said "you must do something about the jewish problem, the finns said "what problem?".

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    46. Re:Populist security sense? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I thought the Pirate Party ought to have used a less controversial name, since 99% of the world used to think pirate=thief. Used to. The "Sharing Party" sounded more positive. But now, I think they were right. The intellectual property extremists have discredited copyright and patent law so thoroughly that "pirate" actually has a positive ring among a growing number of people.

      "Hacker" is just fine. All B&N did was make themselves look bad. As if running a bricks and mortar bookstore alone isn't looking more and more backward by the day, they had to pull an idiotic and utterly futile attempt at censorship. If they're trying to show the world that they're dinosaurs who can't get a clue, about the only worse thing they could do is cancel their ebook program.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    47. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99% of the world does not know how computers work.
      99% of the world are incapable of distinguishing between a hacker and a cracker.

      I don't expect people to understand computers, but if they wish to use a technical word then they should use it in the right context. Actually, if just computer-savvy people use it in the right context, then at least we would be at the same state as most other professions, but when even hardcore geeks say "well, journalists think that we say the wrong thing, so we better change" then I get sad.

    48. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they screwed up the meaning not us, why should we come up with a new term because they are computer illiterate.

      Because that's how language works.

      You can go around using the word "gay" to mean "happy or jovial" but people are going to assume a different definition.
      You can call your cigarettes "fags" in England and nobody will bat an eyelash, try doing that in L.A. and you'll get a different reaction.

      If you're speaking with the general public, you ought to use a definition the general public is assuming. If you're speaking with industry insiders and experts, you can use the technical definition.

      Although in this case, and also in the case of the word "Virus", the definition is not even clearly defined among the industry experts these days. This is how language always has worked, and barring some type of 1984-style level of forced control over language, it will continue to operate this way.

    49. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hackers have every right to criticize the media's use of the term and the media's portrayal of "hacking." If ignorance is not criticized, it will propagate.

      First, it's not "ignorance", it's simply using the wrong definition (according to you) for the term.
      Second, that boat sailed a LONG time ago. You're just beating a dead horse at this point.
      Third, language is a fluid thing which operates essentially on popular consensus. It doesn't matter what you want it to mean, what matters is how it is actually used.

    50. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they however do not see the difference between the cracker and the hacker

      Sure they do. A "hacker" is somebody who is chopping something up into little pieces. Ex: "I hacked up the branch" or "The Viet Cong came back to the village, and hacked off the arms of the children who had been vaccinated" or "He hacked down the door with an axe and stole everything inside."

      A cracker is a piece of bread, or a slur for a white person. You have to qualify it with another word to get other definitions, for example fire cracker, nut cracker, safe cracker, etc.
      Use of the word "cracker" in the manner which you describe is highly irregular (from a linguistic standpoint) compared to any other use of the term.

      So if we look at how the words are used in all other contexts, the popular definition of "hacker" to mean nefarious activity is much more in line with the other definitions than "cracker" is. Which is why people scratched their heads at the computer geeks in the 80's, shrugged, and said "hacker". It stuck, that's what it is, get over it.

    51. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, -1 Troll. Someone needs to get their sense of humor checked.

    52. Re:Populist security sense? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It is not being a 'stupid 10 year old' to insist on the proper use of words, especially when it's the ones who invented the word asking for it to be used properly.

      It's also somewhat of a pointless exercise to waste time trying to correct such mass misuses of technical terminology. There's a long history of such misuse, and efforts to educate the public (or even the media) in correct usage have generally failed miserably.

      One of my favorite examples is the word "quantum", which to physicists primarily means the smallest quantity of something that can exist. The media/popular use is pretty much an antonym of that. A while ago, I read a news story that claimed a "quantum leap" in a company's income over the previous year. My immediate thought was "Did the company's income really increase by exactly one cent?" But of course I understood what the writer actually meant. In this case, there's a tipoff: the use of the phrase "quantum leap". A scientist would say "quantum jump" to mean the smallest possible change. Anyone who writes "quantum leap" generally means a very large change, and probably wouldn't understand the physicists' uses of the term.

      But in other cases, there's no tipoff like this; the technical term is simply misused with a definition that's a wildly-wrong interpretation of the technical meaning. I'll invite others to submit their favorite examples.

      Actually, it sometimes goes the other direction. Mathematicians in particular have often adopted popular/media insults as technical terminology. Thus, quite a few centuries ago, it was demonstrated that the length of diagonal of a square couldn't be represented as the length of a side times the ratio of two integers. Since a square's diagonal can be easily drawn, it clearly has a length, so there are numbers that aren't the ratio of two integers. Supposedly, the mathematician(s) who demonstrated this were attacked as "illogical", "irrational", and other insulting terms. Their response was to adopt the unused term "irrational" to describe this new sort of number, and "rational" for the smaller set of numbers that are the ratio of two integers. Similar insults led to the adoption of "imaginary" to mean a number whose square is negative.

      More recently, some mathematicians have been exploring the properties of surreal numbers, which are based on a new set of axioms that generate all the rational and real numbers, but also a larger set of others that aren't real but are still well ordered. This terminology doesn't seem to derive from any insult, though; it was apparently proposed by Donald Knuth as a fun bit of word play.

      Anyway, attempting to switch the general public (or the media) to the technical use of "hacker" is probably a hopeless quest. The best we can probably do is to distinguish the two usages, with the technical term used as a badge of belonging to the software community.

      Lest you think that the latter point is silly, consider what would happen to a physics student if they used "quantum" in the popular sense while talking among scientists and science students. Correct terminology is routinely used in many technical fields to distinguish competent people from outsiders. There are signs (including in this discussion) that "hack" and its derivatives are being used in just this fashion today.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    53. Re:Populist security sense? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      's an example: swastika. Immediately, you're thinking of 40s era Europe, right?

      Heh. Go to google maps, and ask it for "ToJi Temple, Kyoto, Japan". Note the swastika at the site, and the others scattered around the area. Swastikas are still used routinely in Asian maps to indicate (mostly Buddhist) temples. That probably isn't going to change. It's an ancient usage that wasn't much affected by the misuse of the symbol on the other side of the world for a decade or so by a group of people who aren't around any more.

      It's only is a small part of the world (mostly Europe and North America) where the swastika has any political meaning today. Elsewhere, it's still in use with its traditional meanings.

      My favorite example lately can also be seen on google maps. Enter "Naval Amphibious Base Coronado, San Diego, CA", and zoom in on the little rectangular peninsula sticking out northeast from the barrier beach.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    54. Re:Populist security sense? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      And "intercourse" used to mean conversation.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    55. Re:Populist security sense? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      At one time a "computer" was a person. ...

      My wife likes to tell people that her first job title, back in the 1970s, was "computer". This was at a civil engineering firm, and her job involved doing the calculations for drafters, who in turn made the drawings that were turned into blueprints (which were produced by a cheap copying process so that the valuable originals wouldn't be carried around and used outside in the weather). She actually used some of the early scientific calculators to do much of the work, but she got the job because she was one of the few young people in the area who actually understood math up through trigonometry, and could do the calculations by hand (or in her head) if need be. That job title has pretty much disappeared by now, though smaller models of the calculators are still in use.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    56. Re:Populist security sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, the Finns use a swastika.

    57. Re:Populist security sense? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      Man, your a real Nazi on the proper use of Godwin's Law.

  33. B&N could have destroyed Apple by tekrat · · Score: 4, Informative

    If, in the 70's they pulled Esquire Magazine for carrying the article "Secrets of the Little Blue Box", an article that described phone phreaking.

    This inspired Steve Jobs to convince friend Woz to design and build Blue boxes, which eventually lead to the founding of Apple... now the biggest company in the world...

    Apple started from hacker/phreaker roots, and inspired by an article published in a magazine. Just imagine the damage they've done to the future by pulling this Magazine.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:B&N could have destroyed Apple by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This inspired Steve Jobs to convince friend Woz to design and build Blue boxes, which eventually lead to the founding of Apple... now the biggest company in the world...

      Apple started from hacker/phreaker roots, and inspired by an article published in a magazine. Just imagine the damage they've done to the future by pulling this Magazine.

      Actually, Woz built the blue box on his own. Jobs convinced him he could sell it for like $125 or so (it cost $25 to build). But those were really just the prankish college days. To found Apple, Woz had to hock his beloved HP calculator in order to buy the parts necessary to build the Apple 1.

      Jobs and Woz were friends very early on (started in childhood).

      Anyhow, I think the damage caused these days would be far less than in the 70s. Firstly, it seems deadtree is dying in favor of electronic media, and I'm sure anyone who can't find the deadtree can find billions of similar articles online, if not going to the official website and reading it there. In the 70s, magazines were timely and important sources of information. These days, not so much since the Internet is far faster at it.

    2. Re:B&N could have destroyed Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could have destroyed Apple, eh? In that case, I think you meant "Just imagine the damage they've *spared* to the future..."

  34. Hypocrisy by Petron · · Score: 2

    You can't buy Linux Format because of an article about hacking (which is legal), but you can buy your copy of High Times (full of articles about something illegal under federal law)...

    --
    if (it != oneThing) it = another;
    1. Re:Hypocrisy by preaction · · Score: 1

      Hacking is not legal ("Unauthorized access to a computer system")

    2. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not unauthorized access when you're breaking into your own systems. Silly pranks and paranoia are what gets teens coding and learning about security. It doesn't follow that they all engage in criminal activity although pranks can sometimes cross that line.

    3. Re:Hypocrisy by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      It is perfectly legal when the access is authorized.

    4. Re:Hypocrisy by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      That requires that the hacking is not authorized. There's a whole industry of people that get paid to hack.

    5. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "High Times"? Wait, so, it isn't about life in High School or about mountaineering?

    6. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who's saying it's unauthorized? The security team at my company hacks at our systems about once a year to test for vulnerabilities. They obviously have permission to do that.

    7. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hacking your own machine is perfectly legal...

  35. You lost big time until the french helped you out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or did you think that Mel Gibson film was a documentary?

  36. A Great Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to write for them. Wonderful folks and a great magazine.

  37. cracking not hacking by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

    - hacker == good guy; hobbyist; enginner or technician
    - cracker == bad guy; thief; like a safecracker

    We need to teach the reporters and press the difference between these two words, so they start using "crack" or "cracker" for someone up to no good rather than demeaning us enginners, technicians, and hobbyists.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:cracking not hacking by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 0

      They've already won. The usage of the word has changed, the language evolved.

      Hackers are bad, nefarious people. Accept it, it's a lost cause.

    2. Re:cracking not hacking by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      So, please tell me exactly when we started to differentiate that way. I would dearly love to know this, and I've never been able to figure out exactly where it came from.

      In the mid 80's, it was hacker for both. To me 'cracker' is a term which started in the late 90s or so long after plenty of us were already using the word hacker to describe both of those.

      I've never bought this distinction, because it sounds arbitrary, and completely doesn't agree with the usage that was widespread at the time.

      Someone came along after we'd been using 'hacker' and demanded we start using cracker, and people since then have been saying "oooh, it's cracker, not hacker" ever since.

      So, in my experience and opinion, it's a totally bullshit distinction that everyone gets all butt hurt about, but which happened after the term hacker was already widely used for both. I can just never dig up a reference to when the usage started to shift.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:cracking not hacking by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Well.
      You're wrong.
      Watch some old C64 Demos from pirate groups, or opening crawls from pirated games. "Cracker" and "cracking" is a term that has been around for a long, long time. Pre-1985. Example: "(c) This game cracked by Phreakers. L8mers go home."

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:cracking not hacking by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Wow, are you from the PAST? That's was a valid point in 1995, now it's too late.
      And you definitions are fucking stupid.

      - hacker == hobbyist; enginner(sic) or technician - moral position is irrelevant
      - cracker == thief; like a safecracker - moral position is irrelevant.

      also - People who broke copy control, or modified games where also called crackers. Of course you don't seem me whining that everybody should keep using that term by its 1985 definition.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:cracking not hacking by geekoid · · Score: 1

      See, people here don't understand the news. Hacker does X is the same as Driver does X.

      IN the news, X will be a 'bad' thing. That doesn't not mean all Drivers or hackers are bad.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:cracking not hacking by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Well.
      You're wrong.

      So say you. I'm familiar with the usage, but the 'crack' would have been done by a 'hacker'.

      The crack purely denoted a version which had the copyright broken. It was still widely described as hacking.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:cracking not hacking by digitig · · Score: 1

      - hacker == good guy; hobbyist; enginner or technician - cracker == bad guy; thief; like a safecracker

      We need to teach the reporters and press the difference between these two words, so they start using "crack" or "cracker" for someone up to no good rather than demeaning us enginners, technicians, and hobbyists.

      Or recognise that language changes, recognise that it's a natural process, and try to keep up.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    8. Re:cracking not hacking by Mikkeles · · Score: 2

      Yeah, they really jewed us hackers out of that term :(

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    9. Re:cracking not hacking by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      They called themselves "crackers" or "cracker groups". The evidence is RIGHT THERE is any old 80s demo which you can see when you emulate an old Atari800 or Comodore64 pirated game.

      Stupid L8mer. LOL

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    10. Re:cracking not hacking by pavon · · Score: 2

      From what I've read (not old enough to have lived through it), the innocent form of the work hacker goes back at least as far as the 60s. The MIT model railroad club dictionary is the most commonly cited documentation of it's usage, but it was more widespread than than). Through the 70's it was used in a neutral sense for someone who makes clever technical hacks, and didn't have any security or legal connotations. So phreakers were hackers, not because they broke into phone system, but because they made clever boxes that could do so. In the late 70's the media started using the term hacker to denote someone who a broke into computer systems. This prompted a Usenet backlash in the mid-eighties, which attempted to popularize the term cracker and ret-con the term hacker to only apply to the "good guys". They never won and never gave up, so hacker now has two definitions; the negative one used in the popular media, and the positive one that can only be used in subcultures. Note that this is a very different state than when it had a single neutral definition that happened to apply to both groups.

    11. Re:cracking not hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your username is doubly appropriate for your response. I appreciate that sort of honesty.

  38. No big deal by Klync · · Score: 2

    That's okay, I'll just head down the street to buy a copy from .... Oh, wait .... I know! I'll just go online and order it off .... Oh, shoot. Hmm, where did all the competition go? Oh well, I guess I'll just read whatever B&N or Amazon recommend for me..... Aaah, Excel For Dummies. Excellent.

    --

    ----
    Not to be confused with Col.
    1. Re:No big deal by Jawnn · · Score: 2

      That's okay, I'll just head down the street to buy a copy from .... Oh, wait .... I know! I'll just go online and order it off .... Oh, shoot. Hmm, where did all the competition go?

      Where it inevitably goes in anything approaching the mythical free and open market - into a steadily decreasing pool of competitors until there is, effectively, no competition. Now shut up and consume from the holy capitalist system like a good citizen.

    2. Re:No big deal by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Since you can easily order it from where it came from, or hundreds of mom and pop on-line book stores, we are not at the point you suggest we are.

      Now, going down in person, it might be a problem in your area, ( it isn't in mine ) but it certainly isn't that way online by any stretch of the imagination...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  39. But they seel this book? by hduff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Scarne on Cards
    http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/scarne-on-cards-john-scarn/1104279175?ean=9780451167651

    Teaches you how to cheat at card games.

    Originally produced for the US Army during WW2, it was designed to reveal methods of cheating so a soldier could tell when he was being cheated, just like the Linux Format article.

    Understanding bad people is not the same as being a bad person; ignorance is neither power nor protection.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:But they seel this book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! I learned card mechanics from another Scarne book back in the 70s. I'm really glad to see that Scarne is still in print. That's neat.

  40. Re:Freedom of speech is not the issue here by Jawnn · · Score: 2

    Which US Law that is violating our first Amendment rights that would require B & N to take it down... Perhaps B & N is worried about something.

    Though your grammar and sentence structure make it difficult be certain, it appears that you seem to think that the First Ammendment applies here. If so, you are very much mistaken. Stupid even. B&N can choose to sell, or not sell, anything they want

  41. Barnescrosoft! by metrometro · · Score: 0

    With important new partnership, Microsoft open a new front on malware distributors, by curbing proliferation of the fundamental skills needed to write software! Windows has never been more secure!

    1. Re:Barnescrosoft! by tqk · · Score: 1

      With important new partnership, Microsoft open a new front on malware distributors, by curbing proliferation of the fundamental skills needed to write software! Windows has never been more secure!

      Yes, and you absolutely, positively, without question need to be using a Linux system to do anything like that. It's not like just about any sort of network capable system can be used for that sort of nefarious purpose.

      Somewhere, a Barnes & Noble manager's employees are giggling their heads off behind the back of their oblivious manager, only barely managing to not pee themselves, patting him on the back with "Kick me, I'm stupid!" signs. He's going to go home tonight and hear his ten year old son say, "Dad, you wouldn't believe what I heard some incredibly stupid B&N manager did today!"

      That's when he pulls out the Scotch and starts to beat his wife.

      Thanks Linux. You made my damned day.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  42. Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    They used 'hack' in the populist security sense, rather than the traditional sense

    Where does everybody get the sense that back in the day we didn't use the word for both of those things?

    In 1988, a hack was used to describe a clever tweak of something to do something new, social engineering, and security intrusions. And, as far as I know, had been used in those ways for some time.

    I've simply never gotten this whole "it's crack not hack" stuff, because it feels like we're changing after the fact how the word was actually used in practice. But when I was in highschool in the mid 80s, hacker was the only word we used -- 'cracker' came later.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Hmmm ... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I agree, the cracker vs. hacker debate is pointless. In my book, a hacker is somebody who figures out how to do stuff, not based on what was intended, but rather what is possible. It may be for good or ill, which is a subjective matter in the eye of the beholder.

    2. Re:Hmmm ... by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      But when I was in highschool in the mid 80s, hacker was the only word we used -- 'cracker' came later.

      When I was in jr high and high school (mid 80's to early 90's)...and I BBSed a lot...a hacker was someone who gained unauthorized access to a computer. Cracking was used to describe people who circumvented copy protection.

    3. Re:Hmmm ... by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      I was an avid user of script kiddie BBSes. We had an acronym to describe the kind of BBSes that specialized in this stuff. HPAVC
      H = Hacking (breaking into networks)
      P = Phreaking (hacking the phone system)
      A = Anarchy (text files on bomb making)
      V = Viruses (virus sources)
      C = Cracking (defeating copy protection)

      At least this is how we classified these things.

    4. Re:Hmmm ... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Considering the first time it was used was talk about people who where brakeing the law:

      http://duartes.org/gustavo/blog/post/first-recorded-usage-of-hacker

      Anyways, Hacker is like saying Driver.

      It's the context of the rest of the story that matters.

      Driver save a bus load of children with quick thinking. Drivers runs down pedestrian.

      Hacker steals credit card numbers. Hackers warn of 0 day exploit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Hmmm ... by tqk · · Score: 1

      They used 'hack' in the populist security sense, rather than the traditional sense

      Where does everybody get the sense that back in the day we didn't use the word for both of those things?

      Back then, "crackers" "hacked" into systems and just walked around in them looking at stuff. They tried to be careful to not break anything, and just tried to learn from the experience of being in a system that they didn't know. Steve and Woz' phone phreaking was a lot more malicious than what those crackers were doing. S&W were actually stealing access from POTS systems with their antics.

      Later, black hats figured out how to do the same thing and started raping systems they broke into for valuable, exploitable intel. That's when politicians started to make "cracking" illegal.

      It has never been surprising to me that unsophisticated computer users and the wider public (incl. "MSM") couldn't distinguish between the many different shades of gray in that spectrum. When all you've got is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

      Clifford Stoll's "A Cuckoo's Egg" was the tipping point.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Hmmm ... by tqk · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That'd be an interesting acronym to plug into a search engine.

      They got the "H" wrong though. That one started with the MIT Model Railroading Club, which morphed into computing with the advance of tech. Hacking back then was just generic fiddling with tech. No malicious implications attached.

      They got the "A" wrong too. You don't have to be a bomb thrower to be an anarchist. Cf. Ruby Ridge. They just wanted to be left alone.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:Hmmm ... by formfeed · · Score: 1

      ...to describe a clever tweak of something to

      And that also changed. Take computer product X, and google for "X hack" and what you'll find is an "insider" trick to change the background color of X.

  43. Re:Meanwhile... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

    No, the major US creditor is internal US debt. China owns 7% of the total US debt, which is 30% of the foreign debt.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  44. So does this mean they are policing content? by Compaqt · · Score: 2

    If so, does that mean they are responsible for the content of the other 499 magazines + 20000 books in their store?

    By the way, did any store ban The New Republic when they published a possibly pedophilic article 17 years ago? Or the National Review when they continued to publish what may be seen as racist articles into this decade? I don't know if they did, just wondering.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  45. Calling B.S. on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This sounds like it is just a publicity stunt. B&N carries all kinds of magazines on "Hacking," specifically 2600 Magazine. For what it's worth, my local B&N stores carry very few copies of Linux Format magazine every month and usually sell out mid-month. Also, this is still on the shelf as of today, not "pulled."

    1. Re:Calling B.S. on this one... by Joiseybill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Echo: Bravo - Sierra
      Publicity / maybe a local story "with legs"

      BN sells books on Metaspolit, wardriving, and even "Steal magazines.

          Idea: maybe if one or two complaints causes this kind of reaction, imagine if their phones were to experience the /. phenomenon and just 0.05% of us complained, say about the sadism and child abuse in "The Hunger Games", or the mediocrity of the last Moby album?

      Can we use the power of /. for the good of society? !

      Nah.. nevermind.. no profit involved. Bask to work.

    2. Re:Calling B.S. on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, the copies of 2600 right next to the Linux mags..

  46. Shut up! by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    Quiet! B&N might catch on and stop selling 2600 as well!

    1. Re:Shut up! by tqk · · Score: 1

      Quiet! B&N might catch on and stop selling 2600 as well!

      So subscribe. Get yourself onto the fibbies watch list, and support the USPS.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  47. Obligatory by jabberw0k · · Score: 2

    Lizzie Borden to her Pa: "Papa, can I play outside?" Pa: "Go axe your mother."

  48. It's about the MONEY by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    They don't care if you hurt people, or even if you do it publicly.... But hacking into my server could cause me to LOSE MONEY, and B&N just won't stand for that.

    Alternatively, the solution is simple: Let's all go visit Barnes and noble today and ask them for that particular issue. When they see how much MONEY they could be making by selling it, they may change their tune.

  49. Re:I don't have a subscription to Linux magazine.. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Of course the have the right. It's their shop.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. is your son a computer "hacker"? by jsh1972 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is your son obsessed with "Lunix"? BSD, Lunix, Debian and Mandrake are all versions of an illegal hacker operation system, invented by a Soviet computer hacker named Linyos Torovoltos, before the Russians lost the Cold War. It is based on a program called "xenix", which was written by Microsoft for the US government. These programs are used by hackers to break into other people's computer systems to steal credit card numbers. They may also be used to break into people's stereos to steal their music, using the "mp3" program. Torovoltos is a notorious hacker, responsible for writing many hacker programs, such as "telnet", which is used by hackers to connect to machines on the internet without using a telephone. Your son may try to install "lunix" on your hard drive. If he is careful, you may not notice its presence, however, lunix is a capricious beast, and if handled incorrectly, your son may damage your computer, and even break it completely by deleting Windows, at which point you will have to have your computer repaired by a professional. If you see the word "LILO" during your windows startup (just after you turn the machine on), your son has installed lunix. In order to get rid of it, you will have to send your computer back to the manufacturer, and have them fit a new hard drive. Lunix is extremely dangerous software, and cannot be removed without destroying part of your hard disk surface.

    1. Re:is your son a computer "hacker"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shew! I was worried until I only saw GRUB when my microsoft computer rebooted!

  51. Re:I don't have a subscription to Linux magazine.. by bjorniac · · Score: 1

    The shouldn't assert it in a castle, estate or roundhouse either...

  52. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember what happened last time, Redcoat.

    Last time the Americans and the British fought, the British occupied Washington, D.C. and burned the White House to the ground. It turns out it's much easier to just blockade American ports and burn cities, if you aren't trying to chase an insurgent army across the continental United States.

  53. Um, 2600??? by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Yet, B&N in the US is one of the few remaining places where I can still buy 2600 which tends to cover both hacking and cracking. You know... I always wondered why all the censorship movies and book seem to happen in Europe... V for Vendetta, 1984, etc...

    1. Re:Um, 2600??? by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and B&N is where I got my copy of the Anarchist's Cookbook: http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/anarchist-cookbook?keyword=anarchist+cookbook&store=allproducts

    2. Re:Um, 2600??? by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      B&N is where I bought my copy of Hacker's Delight. Who knows what kind of insidious bit manipulations I may now come up with?

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  54. Was this before or after.... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Was this before or after Microsoft signed a multi-billion dollar deal with B&N?

    1. Re:Was this before or after.... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Was this before or after Microsoft signed a multi-billion dollar deal with B&N?

      That of course was a typo and should have read multi-million, but doesn't change the implication.

  55. Re:I don't have a subscription to Linux magazine.. by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    The shouldn't assert it in a castle, estate or roundhouse either...

    Would You? Could You? In a Car?

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  56. Let them know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

          Maybe someone can post a link to a B&N feedback page of some sort, and then everyone here on /. can write B&N a short note about this action of theirs.

  57. Where else can you buy 2600? by imp7 · · Score: 1

    I've always found 2600 and blacklisted (back in the day) at B&N. This is just bizarre.

  58. Was This Pulled From The Nook As Well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you can get a linux format subscription for the Nook.

  59. I think the latest issue will be too by mshenrick · · Score: 1

    I live in the UK and am subscribed. I received it, back in February. It's about penetration testing, not cr/hacking, but the title is sensationalised. The latest issue says 'beat the CIA' and is about security and encryption

  60. Re:You lost big time until the french helped you o by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    History fail.

    That wasn't the last time the U.S. and the British Empire fought.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  61. We must destroy the word to save it. by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, folks doing legitimate security assessments or building custom gadgets, etc. would do well to come up with term other than "Hacker".

    Abandoning the word is only the first step. We must follow through: deny the word to everyone else. Salt the hacker earth, poison the hacker well, and burn the hacker buildings. If I can't have you, no one can.

    Join me in redefining "hacker" to mean any bad person, and "hacking" to mean any undesirable activty, with no technical connotations.

    That luddite political candidate you don't like? He's too hacker for you. Hitler and Stalin? Those were real hackers, titanic figures from World Hack II.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  62. Article out of date before it hit print by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    There are some good points in the article, but the article from issue 154 is out of date. It refers to the proprietary tool, Nessus, which has been surpassed by OpenVAS. OpenVAS does not even get a mention, despite being useful, GPL software.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  63. anyone can learn anything ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmm it is widely known that anyone with some basic knowledge about socket programming,assembly and generally how operating systems works , can do pretty much ANYTHING he can imagine with a computer system in the world !! everything is already available in alot of formats,papers/pdfs etc..why would they try to censor this stuff now? maybe it is just some commercial debates !!

  64. It's 2012 by Hentes · · Score: 2

    What's a bookstore?

  65. Script kiddie stuff by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    The article shows you how to use nmap, metasploit, and some password brute-forcing tools, OH NOES HIDE TEH UBER-L33T CYBER WEAPONS!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  66. DVD Edition by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    One of the most distinctive features of Linux Format was a DVD edition sold around the turn of the millennium that saved modem-connected users from having to download the latest packages. It was cool.

  67. Protect the 28th amendment by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    If hacking is outlawed, only outlaws will hack.

    Hacking Articles don't hack, people hack.

  68. "hacker" has been hacked by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    The word "hacker" has suffered the same fate as the word "gay". Just as you can no longer say you are 'happy' by using the 'g' word (least you admit you are something else), one can no longer use the word hacker to mean a computer wiz without getting 'cuffed'. GD 5th estate!

  69. The real reason by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

    Since the Barnes & Noble Nook deal with the evil overlords of Redmond, it is obvious that the vile rulers will not want anyone learning that Linux even exists. Like Nokia, Barnes & Noble is now just Microsoft's bitch.

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
  70. The learn to Hack issue is a bit old now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux Format is now up to issue 158, and that has the cover banner "Beat the CIA"!

    Will that even be allowed into the US, let alone get banned by B&N?

  71. That Was Close! As any good dead tree-purveying businessman will tell you, print is the only way to disseminate information. Now that they've pulled the issue, the dangerous information is effectively lost forever and humanity saved.

    --
    Ask me about my sig!
  72. It Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B&N, like most meatspace book and magazine retailers is on the way out. The Nook is really their only profitable division. What with anything that can be read going digital only pretty quickly, we will all be downloading Linux Format to our choice of e-readers. The problem then is being tracked.

    Job Interview:

    Interviewer: "Oh, we see here you read Linux Format magazines as a monthly subscription on your E-Reader 9000. Don't you know they feature "hacking" articles? How can we trust you to administer our servers now that we know you participate in such dreadful reading?"
    You: "I read it to keep up with Linux in general, not hacking. Hacking has become a term with an unfortunate alter-meaning."
    Interviewer: "No matter. We cannot hire you, and will be reporting your reading habits to the major inusrance carriers as well as Evil Shady Corp. because we feel you lead a lifestyle that is not in your best interest."
    You: "You have to be joking, right?"
    Interviewer: "I'm afraid not, sir. This concludes our interview. Have a pleasant day."

    When things go completely digital and you have no choice to purchase your reading interests from one of the walled gardens that sells ebooks and other literature, I cannot help but feel that every human beings' habits will be sifted for nefarious purposes such as judging you based on what you read, assigning a level of risk, trust, etc., to the inumerable profile being bult up for all of us. I'm still waiting for the giant one profile that will inevitably come about -- a massive ginormabyte index of every human being on the planet run by a massive, shady entity that basically decides on the futures of all of us, and one that actual governments fear.

    1. Re:It Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ".. and will be reporting your reading habits to the major inusrance carriers as well as Evil Shady Corp. because we feel you lead a lifestyle that is not in your best interest."

      You (pulling out a smart phone and visibly switching on its recorder): "for the record, I am now recording this conversation as I the original topic of me joining your organisation has just been wiped off the table. Te recap, you are stating that you disagree with certain, perfectly legal aspects of my lifestyle and you will (and I quote) report my reading habits to the major inusrance carriers as well as Evil Shady Corp. because you feel I lead a lifestyle that is not in your best interest. Is that a correct representation of what you just stated, biased and libellous as that would be?"
      Interviewer: "I didn't mean it that way."
      You: "So, you're stating, for the record, that you will NOT violate the privacy of this job interview, nor will make representation of any aspects of it to others, including but limited to your own organisation?"
      Interviewer: "Umm, uh - can we switch this off?"
      You: "Why? Do you have something to hide or have you reconsidered your previous statement to be as bad as it was"

      (etc).

      I think I can safely assume that you're not joking.

  73. What's the Point? by endianx · · Score: 1

    Weird. I'm pretty sure I've bought many copies of 2600 at B&N.

  74. Re:I don't have a subscription to Linux magazine.. by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    If its their manor, I guess they would. If its your manor -- well, you're the baron, and would get to decide.

    (I know you meant manner -- but it's funny your way)

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  75. Internal security failure? (tongue in cheek dept) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps their own web servers or internal corporate security failed some of the article's tests.

  76. Adjective Building by Venner · · Score: 4, Informative

    Merriam-Webster:
    First known use of PREDOMINATELY: 1594

    Even if its used predominantly in America, it's a good bet predominately didn't originate here.
    "To predominate" is a verb, "predominant" is an adjective. At some point in time, someone built an adjective off of the verb.

    My favorite bit of vestigial English preserved in the colonies -- especially in the midwest -- is "gotten."
    And it's not a colloquialism; it's used in formal American English.
    "What have you gotten?" (obtained) vs. "What have you got?" (possession)

    (There's actually another Americanism in a sentence above. We typically say "off of" while the British say simply "off.")

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    1. Re:Adjective Building by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 2

      Actually rather than "off of" or "off", Non American English speakers would say "from" when someone builds and adjective from a verb. At least those with a grasp on grammar. Like the correct version of "What have you gotten?" would be "What did you get?".

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    2. Re:Adjective Building by Mattcelt · · Score: 2

      Correct or not, "what have you gotten" has a different connotation from "what did you get". (It's similar to the French imparfait vs. the passé-composé.) The former phrase denotes an action that may have occurred over time and may or may not be complete (cf: 'What have you gotten so far?'), while the latter implies that the action is finished. And while I despise the misuse of grammar as much as the next !z, I have to rule for the finesse of meaning with this phrase.

    3. Re:Adjective Building by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 2

      That's an interesting distinction, and I suppose the continuous version I would use is "what have you got?" rather than "what have you gotten?". While it's a request for inventory ignoring the process of acquisition, the verbicular acquisition is redundant due to an implication that that which has been acquired has been so from a starting point of nil. (See what I did there? I just adjectivised a verb! Ooooh, I just verberated a noun too!!!!)

      So I guess the truly pedantic version are as follows (US English - English).

      Obtained (infinite): "What have you gotten?"; "What have you got?" (funnily enough using the past tense)
      Obtained (past tense): "What did you get?"; "What did you get?" (funnily enough using the infinitive)
      Possessive: "What have you got?"; "What have you?"

      The last one is correct, but as an Australian English speaker I also tend to (incorrectly) add the word "got" to the end of the sentence even though I know it has my late grandfather (an ex-linguist) spinning in his grave. He hated that as much as the incorrect substitution of "I" with "me" as in this common mistake made by uneducated people attempting to sound educated like my friends and I. Bad grammar was something up which he would never put, while I find myself content to totally split infinitives, for example. I guess languages evolve and diverge and old rules cease to apply, but generally in Australian English, while it's now common to misspell gaol and refer to 10^9 as 1 billion, we do tend to adhere to stricter English English in f***in' anal^W formal settings.

      But I digress.... Where were we?

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    4. Re:Adjective Building by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      "To predominate" is a verb, "

      Yes, it means "Foreplay engaged in by couples into BDSM".

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  77. Damn scriptkiddies by m1ndcrash · · Score: 0

    We don't more of them. The title is wrong "Learn to Hack" should be "Becoming a scriptkiddie for dummies".

  78. Re:"populist security sense" by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

    They should've written something along the lines of "using something other than the way in which was first intended", instead of that narrow and mischief sounding definition.

    Servers were not intended to be available for access to you, if you circumvected that security, then you "hacked" the system.

    --
    "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  79. No Problem.... by Bravoc · · Score: 1

    I'll just run down to Borders and grab a copy. Oh, uh.... wait a minute.

  80. Re:You lost big time until the french helped you o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the war where the USA lost to the British Empire, right?

  81. Re:I don't have a subscription to Linux magazine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like Walmart had the right to remove Marilyn Manson's book "Long hard road out of hell", before everyone stopped shopping there and they went out of business.

  82. Is your son a computer hacker by Liambp · · Score: 1

    This seems relevant to me even if it dates from the dawn of computer time:
    http://www.adequacy.org/stories/2001.12.2.42056.2147.html

    I am surprised it hasn't been linked to yet.

  83. Is there anything M$ money can't buy ? by boorack · · Score: 1

    Patent disputes magially 'settled' just prior to invalidating Microsoft's bogus patents. Abandoning Android in favor of yet-to-be-developed Microsoft's software (hello, Nokia!). Now pulling off Linux-related magazines. It seems that Micro$oft's $300M "investment" into B&N starts paying off immediately.

    1. Re:Is there anything M$ money can't buy ? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I's still trying to imagine why hackers would buy dead tree pulp in the first place. The last time I bought a magazine was near a decade ago, only because I was stuck in the city an hour before a meeting so needed to kill some time reading and sucking up some coffee. Do hackers even buy magazines any more?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  84. nor this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in my manor any sign of a bookstore having an opinion shows they have no manners!

  85. Their shop, their rules by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They can pull books with red covers if they want as that is the color of socialism. Seriously tho, they aren't the government and can pull whatever they feel violates their 'morals' or today's 'mood'.

    Doing stupid things may not be good for business, but somehow i don't think yanking one edition of a niche market magazine is going to make a hell of a lot of a difference.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  86. Back in the day.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I was there, and no, they were totally separate things and were not both referred to by the same term.

    If you can only reference the 80's, you really aren't qualified to comment on 'back in the day'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  87. The first mistake was 53.34 centimeters long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They was trying to avoid mistakes by using open source design, now exactly why did the rack have to be 1.75 feet wide. What is wrong with 50cm?

  88. When are people going to learn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that their actions promote the opposite behavior they hoped to achieve? If they had left the magazine on the shelves, I would not have just downloaded and read the article.

  89. Nope, doesn't pass the smell test by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    B&N has carried 2600 for years, and made a point of responding to complaints that employees were supposedly hiding the magazine behind others. As a bookstore they are in the habit of selling books (and magazines), not pulling sellable items off the shelf because of an alleged complaint.

    On the other hand, I'm glad the UK publisher of Linux Format found a novel new way to freely advertise their material.

  90. I have that issue here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what it says on the front:

    Learn to Hack!
    Attack Servers, Crack Passwords, Exploit services, Beat Encryption, Everything you need to be evil.

    There's an asterisk after "evil", and it reads

    The skills you learn in LXF Dojo are for self defense only, don't break the law.

  91. LXF have themselves to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have subscribed to Linux Format (LXF) from Issue 1. It is a great mag, the best for Linux, and am a regular on their forums.
    This Issue No 154 was in January (slow news) and at the time I commented that their cover was unwise:-

    http://www.linuxformat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14483&highlight=

    I don't think it is just the word "Hack" on the cover, it also exhorts you to "Be evil". So claims that "Hack" is not "Crack", and that B&N, FBI, [whoever] don't understand the difference, are on poor ground because LXF154's cover actually says that this is hacking to be evil. They are tongue in cheek, of course, but a casual outsider can only be expected to see it as what it says it is.

    The LXF front cover words are (I have it in front of me now) :-

    Learn to
    HACK [very large letters, >2" high, biggest thing on the cover]
    Attack Servers >> Crack Passwords >> Exploit Services
    Beat Encription >> Everything you need to be evil

    http://www.linuxformat.com/files/lxf_covers/154-big.jpg

    LXF can only blame themselves for not being more discrete.

    1. Re:LXF have themselves to blame by nukenerd · · Score: 0

      Just to say I posted the parent comment, as AC accidentally.

  92. the hell ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they stock CISSP,CEH, TCP/IP, and network security manuals ? lol what a bunch of morons !

  93. Re:You lost big time until the french helped you o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  94. Re:Good for them! Good for ALL of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux Format should be pulled from all vendors, ESP. those in Asia, Africa, Australia, Antarctica, the Americas, and Europe.

    Who thinks paying 16.99USD for glossy dead trees for a ~100p magazine is particularly brilliant?

    If Linux Format isn't hell-bent on deforestation or just serving the über-elite hacker community, perhaps some sort of standards-based digital "electrified bibliographic ocular observation contraption" (eBooc) could be invented. Possibly, this could use "magic portal word" that would let the reader go right from the page they were reading. to some reference or related work.