Slashdot Mirror


Is Phoenix the Next Silicon Valley?

SpicyBrownMustard writes "There's no secret to a rising level of 'Silicon Valley fatigue' lately, and the new reality show certainly isn't helping. And with hacker hostels packing in twenty somethings fueling the 'it's okay to fail' incubator culture that now is actually hurting startups, it's no wonder weariness with the culture is setting in. Forbes.com asks the question: Is Phoenix The Next Silicon Valley? The article covers a startup with a couple names you might know, who picked Phoenix due to its much lower cost of living and different quality of life. The startup's CTO, 'explains that having so much more financial freedom lowers the stress associated with working for a startup, as he can enjoy work/live balance.' Their location certainly didn't hurt fundraising, as they managed $2 million in seed capital. Are we indeed moving on from Silicon Valley for tech startups?"

555 comments

  1. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Phoenix ?!? Has anyone ever been there?
    This is pure long-shot PR from someone with real estate interests..

    1. Re:LOL by BorisSkratchunkov · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe it'll be re-born!

    2. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but they didn't return after being seared to a golden brown.

      Kansas City should be the next Silicon Valley.
      Google Fiber could support it.

    3. Re:LOL by SomePgmr · · Score: 2

      A year or two ago they were saying Chicago, referencing GroupOn and others. Lately I've heard Austin, Texas a couple times.

      This is the first time I've heard Phoenix, though I admit I don't pay close attention to the whole, "where's the next silicon valley" thing.

    4. Re:LOL by MarioMax · · Score: 1

      Phoenix ?!? Has anyone ever been there?
      This is pure long-shot PR from someone with real estate interests..

      Born and raised, thank you very much.

    5. Re:LOL by drpimp · · Score: 0

      Sure we aren't talking about Alabama here. ASU has some of the hottest college chicks in the US. If you got out of the basement now and then you might have known that. Albeit that has nothing to do with this topic so why Phoenix you ask ... because it's easier to melt silicon there? DUH! /ducks

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    6. Re:LOL by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      I've lived here for 6+ years. Stay away. It's too hot, and too miserable, and the houses are too expensive when people like you come around and start buying them up.

      Try Oregon instead, eh?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:LOL by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Intel is moving some infrastructure to Mesa or Gilbert or somewhere.
      Tech industry is heavy in the Gilbert area. I have seen a few biofuel start ups, a few medical start ups, and a few tech startups in this area as well.
      But, as far as the question of the article, the answer is no.

    8. Re:LOL by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I've been to Phoenix. I's MUCH cheaper.

      You get what you pay for.

      I'd agree, this is a run by the Real Estate association and Chamber of Commerce in Maracopa County. They have a Florida-scale property collapse on their hand, with a weird combination of extreme street violence, gated bedroom-community "culture" and Scottsdale's girls-gone-wild variety, binge-drinking nightlife.

      They run their share of giant data centers in Phoenix and Tempe. Despite being high-technology, I wouldn't say that that's a great match for entrepreneurial software companies.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    9. Re:LOL by slew · · Score: 1

      Phoenix ?!? Has anyone ever been there?
      This is pure long-shot PR from someone with real estate interests..

      Intel has had facilities in Chandler, AZ pretty much forever (since 1979)...

      Even though Chandler is only 25 miles from Phoenix, that presence didn't help it become the next silicon valley in 1990 boom, so what is different today (except the real-estate bust)? Yeah... real-estate interests ;^)

    10. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Intel has had a big presence in Chandler for at least two decades, including their hardware simulators. Additionally I thought they'd put a fab or two in down there somewhere as well recently.

    11. Re:LOL by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The playground is where I spent most of my days.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up informative. I lived in phoenix most of my adult life, moved from there about 5 years ago, still travel there to visit friends, and given the recent developments in Real Estate there, this is DEAD ON. There is no startup type environment there... the tech industry in general is pretty tame there. I worked in tech there, and I have 3 very good friends that still work in tech there so I know what I'm talking about.

    13. Re:LOL by xevioso · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can tell you where the next Silicon Vally is, and you folks down there in promoting Phoenix won't want to hear it:
      San Francisco.

      Not only are people not wanting to move out of California, they are moving to the only place even more expensive than Silicon Vally, which is good old San Francisco.

      http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/San-Francisco-office-sales-booming-3750956.php

      The reason is because the talent is here, and the talent WANTS to come here. Young 20-somethings who are generally creative and technology-oriented don't want to move to Phoenix because 1) It's too hot and 2) It's too conservative.

      Sorry SV wannabees...San Francisco is the place to be.

    14. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kansas City ? Have you ever been there ?
      Ghetto. Surrounded by nothing except rednecks and meth shacks.

      And worse weather than Phoenix BY FAR.

    15. Re:LOL by khallow · · Score: 2

      Cheap meth could power the next dotcom boom!

    16. Re:LOL by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The factors that are always cited in Silicon Valley's success are things like cultural openness, strong public schools and exceptional universities, mild weather, cultural acceptance of taking risks and failing, local venture capital, etc. Phoenix fails on pretty much all counts. Austin has a couple going for it, but is surrounded by Texas. Kansas City is pretty unlikely (Maybe Lawrence KS has a chance though...?). New York will never create that culture, but it will always be a finance/fashion mecca.

      It is interesting to look at the things that made Chicago, Detroit, Columbus, and New Orleans hubs in their day by comparison.

    17. Re:LOL by khallow · · Score: 1

      they are moving to the only place even more expensive than Silicon Vally

      The only question, how are they going to pay for it? I guess that's what the job is for.

      It strikes me that maybe these people are, like my coworkers (at Yellowstone National Park), tourists. They've found a way to visit San Francisco for years at a time. Only problem is that the high tech industry is notorious for long hours. If you're putting in 80+ hour weeks, you aren't going to be enjoying the scenery. It'll be interesting to see if they like working in San Francisco as much as they'd like visiting it.

      When I worked out in San Jose, I had pretty low standards. If there wasn't a lot of drama between where I worked and where I slept, then that was good enough for me.

    18. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try and keep me out gringo. /kidding

    19. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I live in Phoenix (actually Tempe, right next door). I've lived here since 2000, so I think I know something about it.

      This town is a dump. The idea that hordes of techies and young people are going to want to move here to suffer through 115-degree weather is just idiotic. There is no culture here, very few decent places to eat, and the place is full of meth-heads and illegals. It's been rated by several places as the worst city in America to drive in, mainly because it's so chaotic and because there's no consistent driving style (the frequent road-rage shootings don't help). The local economy is shit, and violent home invasions are common. There is some tech industry, both in the north of the metro area and the southeast part, with Intel and Microchip having substation presences, along with some shitty defense contractors like General Dynamics where engineers go to die. The weather is horrible; it wasn't that bad 12 years ago, but it's gotten hotter, and stays hotter for longer now. You can't bicycle here (one of my favorite outdoor activities) because of the heat most of the year, and also because of the dangerous speeding drivers and lack of safe bike paths. And there's really nothing to do here except for walking around the mall. Even worse, they're trying to phase out the indoor air-conditioned malls in favor of these stupid outdoor malls; who the hell wants to walk around in 115 degree heat to shop? They're nice for about 3 months in the winter, and that's it. They used to have Mill Avenue in Tempe that was kinda fun to walk along, which used to have a bunch of quirky little independent shops, but the Tempe government drove all those out of business to make room for a bunch of mall stores and high-rises, which of course went south when the economy crashed, so most of the place is boarded up now.

      This place sucks, and I can't wait to move out in a couple of months. If a bunch of startups do move here, it's going to be short-lived because cool, hip, young employees aren't going to stick around this cesspool for long.

    20. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Fabs aren't places where you want to build start-ups near; they're just factories, with factory workers in them. It's nice that they've located them here instead of China perhaps, but they don't do any more to attract high-tech startups than do auto assembly plants, now that shipping is cheap and easy.

    21. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The houses are already too expensive, even after the crash, and yes, it is hot and miserable. Thankfully I'm headed out, finally; I can't wait to leave this hellhole. I'm tired of seeing tattooed methheads driving around in jacked-up pickup trucks everywhere.

    22. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head with your description of the "culture" here. Don't forget all the shaved-headed tattooed freaks driving around in jacked-up pickups, and similar-looking people (male and female) riding muffler-less H-D motorcycles.

    23. Re:LOL by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      The nightly news always seems to contain a rundown on the latest shooting.

      Or maybe it's just when I visit?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    24. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure is.

      Silicon valley employs alot of skilled foreign tech labor.
      Arizona is one of the last places anyone who isnt white would want to go.
      And even alot of the white people would like to not be there.

      If phoenix ever wanted some of that tech money and large companies moving in. They're going to have to collectively remove the giant stick up their ass. And jail sherrif joe. Cuz that fucker is way too nuts to be roaming around free. With a badge.

    25. Re:LOL by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      Kansas City should be the next Silicon Valley. Google Fiber could support it.

      Why not? Kansas City is a cheap place to live, reasonably cosmopolitan. You just have to find an area where Google Fiber is going to be installed. Who says you have to be in California to code?/p?

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    26. Re:LOL by Kergan · · Score: 1

      This town is a dump. (...) There is no culture here, very few decent places to eat, and the place is full of meth-heads and illegals. (...) It's so chaotic and because there's no consistent driving style (the frequent road-rage shootings don't help). The local economy is shit, and violent home invasions are common. There is some tech industry, (...) along with some shitty defense contractors (...) where engineers go to die. The weather is horrible (...). You can't bicycle here (...) because of the dangerous speeding drivers and lack of safe bike paths. And there's really nothing to do here except for walking around the mall. Even worse, (...) they used to have [an] Avenue (...) that was kinda fun to walk along, which used to have a bunch of quirky little independent shops, but the (...) government drove all those out of business to make room for a bunch of mall stores and high-rises, which of course went south when the economy crashed, so most of the place is boarded up now.

      This place sucks, and I can't wait to move out in a couple of months. If a bunch of startups do move here, it's going to be short-lived because cool, hip, young employees aren't going to stick around this cesspool for long.

      Fixed that for you... Now, replace Pheonix with just about every city in the US that you can think of -- bar the largest dozen or so.

    27. Re:LOL by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a lot of drivel there that doesn't deserve comment ("very few decent places to eat"? are you old or broke?), but this is ridiculous:

      It's been rated by several places as the worst city in America to drive in, mainly because it's so chaotic and because there's no consistent driving style (the frequent road-rage shootings don't help).

      What's the problem, does the square NS-EW street grid confuse you? You're going to need to back up that claim, because Phoenix is nowhere near the worst cities to drive in:

      http://fillmyemptyblogspace.com/2010/12/24/10-worst-american-cities-to-drive-in/
      http://www.businessinsider.com/cities-with-most-car-crashes-2010-10?op=1
      http://autos.yahoo.com/news/15-dangerous-cities-for-driving.html
      http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/05/22/going-nowhere-10-worst-u-s-cities-for-traffic/

      In fact, if you look closely, you can see Chandler listed by Allstate as one of the safest cities to drive in.

      violent home invasions are common

      Define "common". The police claimed that for 2008 there were "over 300" home invasions and kidnappings (fewer than 1 per day, in an area with 4.2 million people), and that claim was investigated by the feds to see if it was exaggerated to get more funding:

      http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoenix/articles/2011/01/26/20110126phoenix-crime-stats-federal-audit.html

      You can't bicycle here (one of my favorite outdoor activities) because of the heat most of the year

      People bike here year round, Facebook posts from other people doing just that are proof. You choose not to, that doesn't mean other people don't do it also. There are people enjoying the Phoenix Mountain Preserve, Dreamy Draw, and South Mountain year round.

      They used to have Mill Avenue in Tempe that was kinda fun to walk along, which used to have a bunch of quirky little independent shops, but the Tempe government drove all those out of business to make room for a bunch of mall stores and high-rises, which of course went south when the economy crashed, so most of the place is boarded up now.

      Really? The main recreational area next to the largest university by enrollment in the country is boarded up now, huh? That's weird.

      This place sucks, and I can't wait to move out in a couple of months.

      Neither can I. Let me know if you need help leaving.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    28. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. I got out of Phoenix the first chance I could. I remember an old joke which is quite fitting:

      The Devil wanted a place on earth
      Sort of a summer home
      A place to spend his vacation
      Whenever he wanted to roam.

      So he picked out Arizona,
      A place both wretched and rough
      Here the climate was to his liking
      And the ground was hard and tough.

      He dried up the streams in the canyons
      And ordered no rain to fall
      He dried up the lakes in the valleys
      Then baked and scorched it all.

      Then over his barren desert
      He transplanted shrubs from hell
      The cactus, thistle and tumbleweeds
      The climate suited them well.

      Now, the home was much to his liking
      But animal life, he had none
      So he created crawling creatures
      That all mankind would shun.

      First he made the rattlesnake
      With its forked poisonous tongue
      Taught it to strike and rattle
      And how to swallow its young.

      Then he made scorpions and lizards
      And the ugly old horned toad.
      He placed spiders of every description
      Under rocks by the side of the road.

      Then he ordered the sun to shine hotter
      Hotter and hotter still
      Until even the cactus wilted
      And the old horned toad looked ill.

      Then he gazed on his earthly kingdom
      As any creator would
      He chuckled a little up his sleeve
      And admitted that it was good.

      'Twas summer now and Satan lay
      By a Saguaro cactus to rest
      The sweat rolled off his wearthy brow
      So he took off his coat and vest.

      "Good grief," he finally panted,
      "I did my job too well.
      I'm going back where I came from
      Arizona is hotter than hell!"

    29. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. Not Oregon. Oregon sucks. It's cold, grey and rainy 10 months out of the year. The traffic in PDX sucks. It puts the Bay Area to shame. The water system sucks. The mass transit system is a nice hoax, you'll see if you move here. The cops like to shoot people for random reasons. If you're not a meth addict, you soon will be one. And "Grimm" is a documentary...

      Keep going up to Puget Sound instead.

    30. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Funny, but it wasn't quite so bad here before so many people moved in and overdeveloped the place with concrete and asphalt, creating a giant heat island. It used to get nice and cool in the evenings even in the middle of the summer (and still does, if you go way out into the open desert far from the cities), but now it just stays 100+ all night long. It's hotter, and stays hotter longer, than it did only 10-20 years ago.

    31. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what to say?

      "This town is a dump" Really? Why?

      "the place is full of meth-heads and illegals" Huh, what about the rule of law? Don't they have laws in Phoenix?

      "(the frequent road-rage shootings don't help). and violent home invasions are common. [...] shitty defense contractors like General Dynamics where engineers go to die. [...]" I see you are kind of down on the place huh? What about the rule of law? Don't they have laws in Phoenix?

      "they're trying to phase out the indoor air-conditioned malls" Question, they can't stop shootings and home invasions, who is this "they" that is against air conditioning? This is a real question, can you answer it?

      "This place sucks, and I can't wait to move out in a couple of months" Yes we get that.

      Can you answer the question?

    32. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Francisco is a dump though.

    33. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh...ever gone over to nearby Scottsdale?

    34. Re:LOL by xevioso · · Score: 1

      The millions of tourists who flock here every year don't seem to think so.

    35. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, this article is 100% troll.

      I live in Phoenix right now, but I am in the process of moving to the Seattle area.

      There are a few good tech jobs here, but not much.

      Remember that Google moved in here back in 2006 and left two years later. They discovered that the local talent was terrible.

      And, that's the primary reason I am leaving. I need to live in a place where I can work with good talented people who care about the quality of their work, and having lived here for over a decade, I am just not finding it and convinced that Arizona just isn't the place to be if I want to work with smart people.

      That, and the local politics -- racism, homophobia, and other similar anti-intellectual issues are indeed problems here.

    36. Re:LOL by defaria · · Score: 1

      You gotta wonder about somebody who hates where he lives and yet remains there for some 12 years. I lived in Phoenix (actually Tempe too) for 2.5 years and I loved it. I worked at GD - loved that too. It's not where engineers go to die. I went there - I survived and I didn't die - in fact, I thrived! And I thrived in Seattle, Washington DC, San Jose and San Diego after that. Ever think maybe the problem is you?

      There are tons of really good places to eat, the women in Scottsdale are hot as a pistol, Meth-heads and illegals? Maybe you should try running in better circles - there are a lot there. Obviously your hanging out with the wrong crowd. Bad drivers? Everybody complains about bad drivers no matter where you live. Phoenix does not have bad drivers - you need to get out and live a little!

    37. Re:LOL by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Heat sucks donkey balls, ruins quality of life HARD. Any place that is hot, sucks, even if it seems like a nice place for a winter vacation it gets old fast and you'll be begging to have your few months of winter in return for pleasant summers back instead of year-round scorching heat. Fuck heat forever.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    38. Re:LOL by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      well a little bit of investment in education and i think Orlando, FL would be great for this! ok maybe i am impartial since i live here and need a freaking job... * gets off the soap box* but atleast give it a chance.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    39. Re:LOL by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      Come see mickey mouse in Disney World! there is even a beach in cocoa!

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    40. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. And to attract world talent, a city has to have something that the rest of the world values: Good public transit and walkable neighbourhoods. Phoenix fails miserably at this, and most people outside the US would consider it unlivable. I would move to SF from Canada. I would think twice about moving to the valley or LA and Phoenix is not even on my radar. No educated worldly person wants to move to a giant suburb with no downtown. SF, Boston, Chicago and of course NYC are adequately urban. Being gay friendly is another bonus. The conservatism of Phoenix scares away a lot of talent.

    41. Re:LOL by lipanitech · · Score: 1

      I agree from what I have read and seen I think New York City is going to be the next Silicon Valley

    42. Re:LOL by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      I was in Scottsdale for a couple of years while I was living in the States, and the heat isn't anywhere near as bad as you say.

      For three, maybe four months over Summer (June, July, August, maybe the end of May or beginning of September) it's definitely very hot, but the rest of the year is great weather.

      The temperatures look high in terms of raw numbers, but the low humidity makes a huge difference. My friends and I were regularly cycling all the way into low 40s (deg C) temperatures (so 110ish F). The biggest problem is not the heat, but carrying enough water.

    43. Re:LOL by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      If a bunch of startups do move here, it's going to be short-lived because cool, hip, young employees aren't going to stick around this cesspool for long.

      Why is cool, young, and hip important?
      I'm only curious as these tend to be the most problematic in my experience, especially the latest batch.

    44. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh don't be a gloomy gus, it's just the realization that you are only half way through summer

      just wait for the october through may springtime weather and the inevitable snowbirds

    45. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      intel, on semi, raytheon, allied signal, general dynamic, dozens of smaller contract shops not to mention many old standards that have fallen by the wayside (poor poor dec), my ex even worked for something call itt courier that was building 'the frog' (their answer to the mac) back in the mid 80's

    46. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about hiring the locals? Just move the San Francisco offices over. They can buy twenty houses for the price of one. Starbucks and Apple stores will follow. The neighborhood is what you make it. Also, who ever heard of a free house as a hiring bonus? It's possible and sure beats Detroit.

    47. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, I remember sitting on the back porch watching thunderstorm roll in and being chased out of the pool by lightning, taking bets walking down asphalt roads barefoot and catching frogs in the open drainage canals

      bygone era, I still live here though mainly because of deep roots and a decent job market. traveled some on a consulting gig and I have to say that both coasts and Chicago have their high points, but honestly I feel 'at home' where trees are more like bushes, rivers only have water in them every couple of years and the entire population goes crazy from the heat in August

      as far as the ggp goes...

      the heat weeds out the weak
      cool places? if you don't know, then you don't know... loser
      learn how to drive
      good job market for developers
      try biking on the canal trails, get a mountain bike try the preserves
      mill avenue was cool long before you got here, downtown art scene was hopping when you arrived, not going to tell you what's happening now...
      adios :)

    48. Re:LOL by danbuter · · Score: 1

      And Taxes killed them all.

    49. Re:LOL by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The playground is where I spent most of my days.

      You know, we really don't like pedophiles around here ....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    50. Re:LOL by schnell · · Score: 1

      A year or two ago they were saying Chicago, referencing GroupOn and others. Lately I've heard Austin, Texas...

      This whole "the next [INSERT TECHNOLOGY] Mecca will be..." has been going on for decades, and always with different locations. Very few ever pan out.

      The fact of the matter is that while a startup can go anywhere, for anyplace to become "the next whatever hub" it has to be built around one or more existing big players who are already there. There's only one Silicon Valley, and a few minor outliers for tech in the US:

      • Silicon Valley was built on people getting access to HP and Intel, then it was Apple, and then Netscape, Yahoo! and Sun, then Google and so on. Arguably it continued to grow there more because of all the people who cashed out of those players and had money to invest than because of the great engineering schools in the area. Nobody is challenging SV anytime soon as a result.
      • Seattle being put on the map as a tech hub was built around Microsoft being there - purely an accident of Bill Gates and Paul Allen being from the area (although the later arrival of Nintendo because of Seattle's proximity to Japan didn't hurt). Amazon was also more or less an accident to end up in Seattle - Jeff Bezos was a Wall Streeter who wanted to be based in a state with good transportation and logistics and no state income tax but a low population so the majority of people wouldn't have to pay state sales tax on online purchases. But once these other players were there, an ecosystem of technology accrued around it.
      • New York tried to build "Silicon Alley" and it worked for a while (and still does to a small extent) just because if your business depends on Big Content or Big Capital Markets, you want to be right there. But it has never recovered from the dot-com bust days (you can no longer pay your cab fare in Flooz).
      • Northern Virginia once touted itself as the "Silicon Dominion" (terrible name!) hub for Internet businesses because AOL was there, along with Network Solutions (remember them?) plus telecom players like MCI, the MAE East Internet hub (remember that?), etc. But AOL got bought and moved to NYC, as did MCI, and its influence waned badly after the dot-com bust as well.

      TL; DR: you can't build a new hub for technology until you already have a critical mass of major tech players to be around. Catch-22, I know, but that's why Silicon Valley is what it is.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    51. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's full of a bunch of $30,000-a-year millionaires. Ever gone to south Scottsdale?

      Scottsdale is little better than the rest of the Phoenix area, and worse in some ways than some other parts. The people there are pretentious jerks (aka, $30k/year millionaires, and also people who do have some money but again are pretentious jerks), there's nothing much to do (though I will say old town Scottsdale is a lot better than Mill Avenue these days; there's a few places to go there and some interesting shops, but I've been to small towns in other states that offer just as much), there's some shitty tech companies there like GoDaddy, and it's full of a bunch of shitty, overpriced homes made out of cardboard.

      And South Scottsdale isn't much better than Sunnyslope.

    52. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think it's a relative thing, not binary. There's some warm places that are pretty nice (San Diego is coming to mind right now), but they don't get *that* hot. Heck, Hawaii is really nice, and it gets rather warm there, but never as hot as Phoenix.

    53. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Why is cool, young, and hip important?

      Because they're the employees you want in a startup. The older people with families and mortgages aren't about to spend their time on something that doesn't pay well, and has a 90% chance of going nowhere and leaving them unemployed in a year. Young people will do it because they like pioneering something new, and because they can afford the risk (if the startup succeeds, they stand to make a lot of money, but the chances for failure are high). If it doesn't work out, they'll just go get another job, but they don't depend on a stable income at that stage in their lives.

    54. Re:LOL by Wovel · · Score: 1

      It was a fresh prince reference, but I have no idea why.

    55. Re:LOL by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      Cheap isn't the half of it. You make 10$/hr there and you are practically a millionaire.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    56. Re:LOL by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add: The only reason Google was able to build there fiber there is because no one would notice the tore up streets after it was done.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    57. Re:LOL by tooyoung · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can only imagine that the people who modded the parent up have never been to Phoenix and assumed that the counter arguments listed were valid. As someone who has lived there, allow me to clarify:

      It is over 100 degrees for a significant amount of the year. If you go for a walk at night, it is still in the high 90s. Phoenix is the 6th largest city in the US, and is located in the middle of the desert. It has no semi-cool counter culture like nearby Tucson. It is just massive sprawl. Yes, it has great Mexican food, and 3 months of the winter are awesome, but the idea of people flocking there for hot tech jobs is insane.

      Would you raise your children in a city where the only place you see grass is golf courses and cemeteries? Would you jump to move to a city with no distinctive downtown, but rather 4 million people living in uncontrolled desert sprawl, completely devastated by the housing crash? And, yes, in Phoenix, it was a crash - houses thrown up with the cheapest materials and labor, doubling in price after only 5 years, only to be devastated by the realization that the owners paid for a tiny lot in a 4 million person desert sprawl, with the closest attraction being Las Vegas?

    58. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define "common". The police claimed that for 2008 there were "over 300" home invasions and kidnappings (fewer than 1 per day, in an area with 4.2 million people), and that claim was investigated by the feds to see if it was exaggerated to get more funding:

      Oh how I love sweden even more now.. we are about 10 million people with about 0.5 kidnappings per YEAR.

    59. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case you should be encouraging them to come... once the prices go up, you can sell your house at a fat profit and move somewhere nicer.

    60. Re:LOL by Alioth · · Score: 1

      So basically Phoenix is like Houston with even more heat and nowhere decent to eat out. At least Houston was judged consistently to be one of the best cities to go out for a meal.

    61. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The counter arguments are valid. I happen to love the desert and hike and bike year-round. People who don't like the heat don't come here or leave quickly. The rest of us appreciate a dry heat.
      The real reason Silicon Valley won't happen here is that the political climate is very conservative to the point of crazy. The politicians are obsessed with guns and abortion, as are many of the populace. The huge LDS presence in the East Valley is particularly suffocating (remember Prop 8?).

    62. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you where the next Silicon Vally is, and you folks down there in promoting Phoenix won't want to hear it:
      San Francisco.

      Not only are people not wanting to move out of California, they are moving to the only place even more expensive than Silicon Vally, which is good old San Francisco.

      http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/San-Francisco-office-sales-booming-3750956.php

      The reason is because the talent is here, and the talent WANTS to come here. Young 20-somethings who are generally creative and technology-oriented don't want to move to Phoenix because 1) It's too hot and 2) It's too conservative.

      Sorry SV wannabees...San Francisco is the place to be.

      Gee, I thought the talent was going to China, where good jobs and seed money is available. You can still retain American citizenship. Benefit-- you learn a second (or third) language and appreciate a different society and its values.

    63. Re:LOL by citylivin · · Score: 1

      "Define "common". The police claimed that for 2008 there were "over 300" home invasions and kidnappings (fewer than 1 per day, in an area with 4.2 million people),"

      LOL. I would define common as "happening almost every day" but whatever!

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    64. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you raise your children in a city where the only place you see grass is golf courses and cemeteries?

      Yes. Why would I want grass? Can I convince people to remove the grass from their lawns where I live? At least convince the members of my HOA that requiring grass lawns is a bad idea.

      I don't get this obsession with grass where it can't survive naturally. I'm required to spend money watering that shit, or it will die. Why don't people just populate their lawns with native plants if they need the nature thing?

    65. Re:LOL by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Well, as someone with 33 years of living here, allow me to retort.

      It is over 100 degrees for a significant amount of the year. If you go for a walk at night, it is still in the high 90s.

      Instead of saying "significant", let's put a number on that (from Wikipedia):

      The temperature reaches and exceeds 100F (38C), on average for 110 days of the year, including most days from late May through to early September. Highs top 110 F (43 C) an average of 18 days during the year. ... Overnight lows greater than 80 F (27 C) occur frequently each summer, with the average July low being 81 F (27 C), and the average August low being 80 F (27 C). On average, 67 days throughout the year will see the nighttime low at or above 80 F (27 C).

      I would say a third of the days in the year could be considered "significant". It's not a huge problem though, the main thing that the heat dissuades me from doing is going on runs through the desert in the summer. That's a tradeoff I'm willing to make for the ability to go on runs through the desert during the other 8 months.

      It has no semi-cool counter culture like nearby Tucson.

      It does, but nothing is centralized. For example, there are similar bands that play in North Phoenix, Mesa, and Tempe, but they all have different audiences. The same types of people going to the same types of shows, but everything is so spread out that the different pockets never join up into a larger cultural influence. Downtown hosts the art walk once a month as well (this Friday in fact, which I may go to if it wasn't for the fact that I'll be at the Fear Factory show at the Marquee).

      the idea of people flocking there for hot tech jobs is insane

      It's not so outlandish when the cost of living here is 40% or less compared to other major cities.

      Would you raise your children in a city where the only place you see grass is golf courses and cemeteries?

      C'mon now. My neighborhood, for instance.

      Would you jump to move to a city with no distinctive downtown, but rather 4 million people living in uncontrolled desert sprawl, completely devastated by the housing crash?

      Yes, a lot of people would jump into a city with a very low cost of living which also happens to have a ton of low-cost homes currently available. The housing crash isn't bad for everyone, just bad for people who bought houses they couldn't afford. It didn't affect me at all, my home price shot up by about 250%, went back down to about 80% of where it started, and has since risen to just above what I paid for it before the bubble.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    66. Re:LOL by slinches · · Score: 1

      It is over 100 degrees for a significant amount of the year. If you go for a walk at night, it is still in the high 90s. Phoenix is the 6th largest city in the US, and is located in the middle of the desert. It has no semi-cool counter culture like nearby Tucson. It is just massive sprawl.

      I won't deny that summers can get very hot during the afternoon and early evening, but even now I can go hiking in the mornings and be comfortable. At 6:00am it's been ~80F and moderately humid, but this is the worst time of the year due to the monsoon moisture. Any other time of year the humidity is very low making mid-90s temps perfectly fine weather for a walk.

      There's also plenty of culture available, but it is usually found in smaller pockets scattered around the valley making it a bit more difficult to find than some other places.

      Would you raise your children in a city where the only place you see grass is golf courses and cemeteries?

      Where were you that didn't have any parks nearby? Even most of the suburban neighborhoods on the outskirts have nice parks with grass and sports facilities.

      Would you jump to move to a city with no distinctive downtown, but rather 4 million people living in uncontrolled desert sprawl, completely devastated by the housing crash? And, yes, in Phoenix, it was a crash - houses thrown up with the cheapest materials and labor, doubling in price after only 5 years, only to be devastated by the realization that the owners paid for a tiny lot in a 4 million person desert sprawl, with the closest attraction being Las Vegas?

      No distinctive downtown? The Phoenix area has several. Just off the top of my head, there's Downtown Phx, Old Town Scottsdale and the Mill ave area in Tempe. Each of which has a unique sub-culture, so there's something for everybody, and they're all within a 30 min drive of each other.

      As for the housing "crash", that wasn't much worse than average in well established areas. The outlying areas (Buckeye, Apache Junction, Peoria, etc.) were hit hard for sure, but those were more recent developments that were being built out during the pre-05 boom and were out-building peak demand just as the crash was starting.

      The closest attraction is Vegas? Now you're just trolling. You have to drive past the @#($*&(@ Grand Canyon to get there.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    67. Re:LOL by grimm26 · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of drivel there that doesn't deserve comment ("very few decent places to eat"? are you old or broke?), but this is ridiculous:

      I lived in the PHX area 2003-2007 and there are indeed few decent places to eat. Most restaurants are chain and/or shitty. The thing that surprised me the most was how hard it was to find a decent Mexican restaurant in the PHX area. Forget about Asian cuisine.

      It's been rated by several places as the worst city in America to drive in, mainly because it's so chaotic and because there's no consistent driving style (the frequent road-rage shootings don't help).

      What's the problem, does the square NS-EW street grid confuse you? You're going to need to back up that claim, because Phoenix is nowhere near the worst cities to drive in:

      http://fillmyemptyblogspace.com/2010/12/24/10-worst-american-cities-to-drive-in/ http://www.businessinsider.com/cities-with-most-car-crashes-2010-10?op=1 http://autos.yahoo.com/news/15-dangerous-cities-for-driving.html http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/05/22/going-nowhere-10-worst-u-s-cities-for-traffic/

      In fact, if you look closely, you can see Chandler listed by Allstate as one of the safest cities to drive in.

      If it is so damn safe to drive, why were my auto insurance rates double what they were in Chicago while I lived in PHX? I routinely found myself at 4-way stops where everyone stared at each other wondering who should go next. There were major crashes on the 10 almost daily. People drive as if they are wandering aimlessly. If I am on the road, I have a destination in mind and want to get there.

      You can't bicycle here (one of my favorite outdoor activities) because of the heat most of the year

      People bike here year round, Facebook posts from other people doing just that are proof. You choose not to, that doesn't mean other people don't do it also. There are people enjoying the Phoenix Mountain Preserve, Dreamy Draw, and South Mountain year round.

      Yes, crazy people bike there year round. I was amazed by how many people I saw out jogging at 2pm in 105 degree heat. Pure insanity. Not only the heat, but it is so dusty and dry, outside exercise is pure torture most of the time. Not to mention the threat of valley fever. The other thing that got me is that even though it is a desert, people use insane amounts of water. Every new subdivision has a big water feature out front. Most people opt for a big green lawn (that has to be watered daily). The drinking water is absolutely terrible unless you get an RO system or get bottled water. Public transportation is a joke, mainly because the population density is not high enough to merit the infrastructure. They build roads like crazy, though. The other factor is the people. This is purely subjective, but the PHX area has a lot of evangelicals and conservative religious types. And don't forget the plain old (and I mean old) conservatives. Maybe that's your cup of tea.

    68. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phoenix and the rest of the valley have their fair share of problems. Most pressing are: sprawl (and people still leaning on cheap land and housing as a pillar of the economy); awful politicians and elected officials who continue to get voted into office because of fearful senior citizens and wingnuts; the lack of investment in education because of those politicians; lack of shade and development that does nothing about heat island issues ... yeah, those are all admittedly problems.

      Those issues don't make the idiot-talk about no culture in Phoenix true, though. There is a lack of awareness of the culture that does exist here, especially amongst loudmouth know-nothings What they say is usually more of a reflection of their own lack of cultural appreciation and their lack of motivation to explore anything beyond their computer screen or front door. While they complain, shit themselves, and do nothing, there are others who partake in what Phoenix has to offer or are adding to it. The complainers of Phoenix basically have no balls.

      Native American culture has been here for thousands of years. From the canals that the Hohokam created that are actually the basis of the modern canal system that provides water to central Arizona, to contemporary artists that do everything from exploring the issues of their identity within Arizona culture and the United States to celebrating their roots, Native Americans and their influence run deep for people willing to look past the strip malls.

      As far as Phoenix and the rest of the valley only having a few decent places to dine, that's also not true. There are a ton of upscale places that are routinely lauded that I'll go without mentioning because A) I personally haven't eaten at most of them and B) it's not like anyone with your views is gonna pony up and undertake a culinary tour of the valley.

      Rather than rattle off a ton of great Phoenix places to eat, I'll focus on the spots in and around Tempe since they're in your area:

      - Cornish Pasty Company
      - Thai Basil
      - Cartel Coffee (nothing much to eat except pastries, but the best coffee in Arizona)
      - House of Tricks
      - Chuckbox
      - Venezia's Pizza
      - Pita Jungle
      - Cheba Hut
      - Green (all vegan, all delicious)
      - Lolo's Chicken & Waffles
      - Nello's Pizza

      If you're willing to take a short drive further east, Joe Johnston's restaurants Liberty Market, Joe's Real BBQ, and Joe's Farm Grill are great places that balance quality food, attention to detail & service, and value. (Joe loves Arizona & great food here that's not only from his establishments; his adventures are worth following: @realjoe.)

      Between the places I've mentioned and those whole-in-the-wall gems (probably staffed by the undocumented workers you seem to have a problem with), all anyone has to do is pull up Yelp on their phones to find an abundance of good-to-great dining options. Finding good dining in Phoenix and the rest of the valley is almost moron-proof. Almost.

      Regarding meth-heads: that might be a reflection of the area you live in or the places you frequent. I live, work, and play primarily in central Phoenix and I'm in downtown frequently. Honestly, I hardly ever encounter any tweakers and it's definitely not like it was from about 2004 to 2007 when meth-use seemed to be out of control. That's purely from anecdotal evidence on my part, but it was also before huge anti-meth PSA campaigns were undertaken. I just ran into someone who was gaunt, jabbering about nonsense, and shifting his jaw like meth addicts do and I realized that it had been a couple of years since I had seen someone that obviously tweaking. For what it's worth, this was in Tempe.

      As far as driving around town, I will concede that there are some pretty awful drivers in abundance here. That's because there are assholes everywhere (not just in Phoenix), but there are also tons of transplants from all over the country who bring their regional driving styles with them, causing clashes and crashes of all

    69. Re:LOL by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of seeing tattooed methheads driving around in jacked-up pickup trucks everywhere.

      I'm afraid you'll have to move to Canada or Europe, then.

    70. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't agree more. Add to your comments the following:

      - The city was designed and built with cars in mind, not people. It's not like any other city I've ever lived in! Virtually nothing is walking distance!

      - The heat is only a problem 6-7 months of the year, but the sun is a problem every damn day. Dermatologists are doing a good bit of business here with all the skin cancer that even people who never tan develop. Plan on buying and slathering on a LOT of sunscreen.

      - If you like trees, grass, gardens, flowers or anything besides cactus, rocks and oleander, you'll have to water, water, water it. Having a vegetable garden isn't like it is in other parts of the country. You'll have to buy soil (everything here is just sand) and install shade cloth and irrigation.

      - Speaking of water, there ain't none. Natural water levels are dropping at an alarming rate while developers build more golf courses, pools for every house and fake lakes. Yes, there are no natural lakes or ponds in this desert. Every one you see is man made. Some near my house are full of chemicals to inhibit growth of algae and plants and are dyed blue. Yes, they dye the water blue. (see "EVERYTHING is fake", below)

      - EVERYTHING here is fake. Not just the lakes! Everything is manufactured to look like a glamorous lifestyle, but it's all just a facade. That includes the people. I have never in my life met so many self-serving, vapid, empty, soul-less people. If you watch "Keeping up with the Kardashians" and long for their lifestyle but can't afford it, Scottsdale is for you.

      - Let's not forget that this is a really, REALLY "red state". As long as you're a right wing conservative republican who carries a gun everywhere (and MANY people do here) and denies climate change, you'll get along just fine. It's rather pathetic that my dentist has to put a sign on the front door to tell people that guns are not allowed in his office!

      - Thanks to our elected "leaders", Arizona is the laughing stock of the country. The Mississippi of the west.

      Anyone who thinks this is the "Next Silicon Valley" is hilariously mistaken! It's nothing close to Silicon Valley, but it's good at faking it.
           

    71. Re:LOL by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Not really. You could argue that Unions played a roll, or in broader terms the "old boy" network, but it was likely intermodal shipping containers, air freight, and globalization that are really to blame.

      Cost of doing business in a particular location only became a dominant issue when goods could move easily across the globe.

    72. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm moving to the greater NYC area soon, and I don't see anything like that in that area. In fact, pickups are pretty rare, as are shitty H-D motorcycles.

      Also, the idea that Canada is free of such things is probably quite wrong; I haven't been there myself, but from what I read, Alberta isn't exactly a place known for high culture.

    73. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, pretty much. We've got the road-rage shootings that Houston has, but without the decent places to eat. Not that there aren't any, but they're pretty few and far between for a city of this size. Sure, there's tons of shitty corporate chain restaurants like TGI Friday's, plus all the typical fast-food garbage and then some, but if you want a quality meal made with quality ingredients, and good service to go along with it, it's pretty hard to find. I've found a handful of really good places, but it gets a little boring eating at the same ~4 places all the time, or having to drive 30 minutes to go someplace else. Worse, consistent with the generally incompetent service people here in every industry, the food service here is really bad too; you can't have a meal with your significant other without having some stupid waiter bust into your intense conversation every 5 minutes asking "How's that tasting for you?!?!", and then right after that some fat-ass manager coming around and asking the same thing because he has nothing better to do. It seems no one around here has any clue how to provide decent service at any restaurant that's less than $50/plate. And then if you do go to a high-priced restaurant at one of the resorts, you're likely to get some Mexican waiter who gives you an attitude when your wife speaks up and orders for herself instead of deferring to you, the man (true story).

      "tooyoung"'s description is exactly right. There are some tech jobs here, at large companies like Intel, but for the size of the city (metro area) it's not much, and everyone there is married with kids, living in a gated compound in Gilbert or Chandler, surrounded by giant strip malls.

    74. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      At least convince the members of my HOA that requiring grass lawns is a bad idea.

      Hahahaha, good luck with that. HOA board members aren't generally known for practicality.

    75. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The "low cost of living" thing is a total lie. Sure, it's cheaper than Silicon Valley (what isn't?), but you can live cheaper in most large cities on the east coast.

    76. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's nothing "distictive" about Mill Avenue these days except for a bunch of shitty bars. All the interesting stores have been run out of town. Once in a while they'll have a little art festival, but that's about it. Downtown Phoenix has nothing interesting, just a few places that might be OK for lunch for the crowd that works downtown, and everything closes at 6PM. Old Town Scottsdale is the only thing on that list that's really worth spending any time there at all, and even that's mainly a bunch of art shops catering to tourists with the same fake western crap art.

    77. Re:LOL by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      They don't live there; SF is like a shit sandwich, with a pretty wrapper and great PR.

      With little gems like the payroll tax, it's laughable to claim SF is start-up-friendly. It isn't even a particularly tolerant city, concept-wise, socially, or in any of the ways people usually (incorrectly) assume it is.

      If you're considered a liberal in your small town, in SF you'll most likely be considered a scum-bag conservative. If you're educated and creative, SF might be interesting for a few months, but the militant conformity there gets old fast. And it's a hideously expensive city with ridiculous rent control laws and very little incentive and opportunity to even own your own home.

    78. Re:LOL by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The thing that surprised me the most was how hard it was to find a decent Mexican restaurant in the PHX area.

      Yep, the higher-end places are all "fake Mexican"; you'll find a much more authentic Mexican meal at Filiberto's. There are some places to get really authentic Mexican food, but they're tiny holes in the wall and hard to find.

      The drinking water is absolutely terrible unless you get an RO system or get bottled water.

      Yes, exactly. Luckily, there are big RO vending machines at many stop-and-rob stores, but it's a pain having to get your drinking water out of a machine all the time.

      This is purely subjective, but the PHX area has a lot of evangelicals and conservative religious types. And don't forget the plain old (and I mean old) conservatives.

      Yes, but don't forget all the Mormons in the east valley.

    79. Re:LOL by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      I've driven in Phoenix. I have friends that live there. I've lived all over the US, and it IS one of the most dreadful places to drive in the US, though not as gawd awful as places like SF.

      The altitude is another issue. If you are thinking about moving there, and feel ill on your visit, you have mild altitude sickness. There's no way to know for sure how long it will take for it to pass, could be a couple weeks, or a couple months, or a year.

      Also, the downtown is a farce. It's a shithole.

    80. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the higher-end places are all "fake Mexican"; you'll find a much more authentic Mexican meal at Filiberto's.

      Filiberto's is great for what it is — lazy 3 am "Mexican" food (likely prepared by real Mexicans). You'll never set foot in a Taco Bell ever again.

    81. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a lot like Fresno. You didn't mention Bigots for Billionaires though. Doesn't Phoenix have chicken shack?

    82. Re:LOL by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Not really. Here's a list of cities with a low cost of living:

      http://www.areavibes.com/library/10-cities-lowest-cost-of-living/

      The closest thing to the description of "most large cities on the east coast" would be Atlanta and the listed cities in NC. No major city on the east coast farther north than NC is cheaper to live than Phoenix, Glendale, Scottsdale, Mesa, and Tucson.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    83. Re:LOL by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Altitude? The altitude of Phoenix is just over 1100 ft. That's similar to places like Atlanta and Topeka, neither of which are known for altitude sickness.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    84. Re:LOL by yenic · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can place most of the largest cities in that pool but I live and work in Chicago and it does not suck. It's the furthest thing from how he described Phoenix. I wouldn't move anywhere besides to Silicon Valley or SanFrancisco, and I could- because of my technical talents, but I don't want to.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
    85. Re:LOL by yenic · · Score: 1

      At least Houston was judged consistently to be one of the best cities to go out for a meal.

      I lived in Houston for a time, and have family there. And your statement above is a lie. Houston would be a better choice than Phoenix, but the food was never the draw- it's a big village with a large proportion of rednecks. The place would be better if it had more hispanics, and it already has a lot.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
  2. Think of the advantages... by Genda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can dispense with wafer ovens altogether... just put your silicon outside in the parking lot...

  3. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_Law_of_Headlines

    1. Re:No. by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 2

      Someone please mod this guy up, he has been consistently saving me time replying to pointless waste of time threads recently

    2. Re:No. by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Excellent. This "story" deserves no better a reply and no further thought.

  4. For too long now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Silicon Valley is a place and an idea.

    The "idea" can and does spread wherever there are people who are willing and economic conditions that will support it.

  5. Fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No amount of money is worth dealing with that heat.

    1. Re:Fuck that by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      We don't deal with the heat. We stay inside. Or in the pool.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Fuck that by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, we don't. We suffer through the heat as we walk from the edges of giant parking lots to our wonderful new outdoor shopping centers like Tempe Marketplace that the developers here have told us that "everyone wants now"

      Being in the pool doesn't prevent you from getting massive sunburn, unless you can breathe underwater and stay under there the whole time.

    3. Re:Fuck that by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Sunscreen is hard on the filter. Tempe Marketplace? gimme a Harkins.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  6. Arizona? No Thanks by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is Phoenix The Next Silicon Valley?

    Dear God, I hope not. In the current political climate, as an immigrant, I am avoiding Arizona entirely unless it's absolutely required.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  7. Not all tech companies start in California by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

    I mean, I can think of a little company from Albuquerque that ended up doing pretty well for itself.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a tech startup in pittsburgh. Most VC's wont even listen to us because they'd have to get on a plain and leave southern California to visit our office.

    2. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. We're in the Midwest and that's all they have to hear. Seems only people in California can have a good startup.

      So the answer is no Phoenix is not the next silicon valley

    3. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, they might refuse to listen to you because you can't spell the word 'plane.'

      "Dear Sur or Maddum: We wood lyke to pitch yew on hour stardup vencher. Pleas get on the furst plain too Pittsburg n bring fat stax of kash, wee will meat yew at the airport with a lim- lim- limmo- privit kar."

      I mean, with an elevator pitch like that, I can't imagine how you're not already in your third round of funding, raising $75 million. Clearly it's Southern California VC elitism, looking down their nose at you hardworking Pittsburgh-ians. Not the fact that you apparently can't spell very simple words, yet seem to feel you're entitled to VC funding for your "billion dollar idea."

    4. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by slew · · Score: 1

      I mean, I can think of a little company from Albuquerque that ended up doing pretty well for itself.

      Of course, they weren't originally from NM, they moved there from Boston location to be nearer to their first primary customer (although they first incorporated in NM). Later, they moved to the place which was the headquarters of the company that created the program that became the basis of their first block-buster product...

      So I guess another option to starting in CA is to chase your primary customer around the country. Unfortunatly, that might be the same as starting in CA if your primary customer is in California, right? That's not true for every company, but quite a few tech companies fall into that situation these days...

    5. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's New Mexico and they're not still there...

    6. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      They probably wont talk to you because you think Silicon Valley is in southern California and if you can't get that detail right they don't trust you on other details.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people wouldn't share your enthusiasm for makers of crystal meth, no matter how much they're into science.

    8. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by mbc2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, I can think of a little company from Albuquerque that ended up doing pretty well for itself.

      Los Pollos Hermanos?

    9. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I can think of a few thousand that started in CA.

      Sure there's going to be some successful startups in *any* place, but until they fix the critical issues for tech companies to flourish, I'm not betting on it.

      'it's okay to fail' ==> the same Wall St culture:
      a. get a high profile job (Google vs Morgan Stanley)
      b. Become a master of the universe (Sr. Dev/Engr/Architect/Evangelist vs. Hedge Fund manager)
      c. May sure you get all the benefits (higher salary *every year*, bonuses, patent awards, under the table deals)
      d. Work at 70% efficiency (12hr days vs. gambling with people's money)
      e. Show no loyalty
      f. Run the company into Chap11 and jump ship onto a new company. Wash, Rinse, Repeat.

    10. Re:Not all tech companies start in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the Altair was a raging success.

  8. weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that the weather in #Phoenix sucks really badly. It's too hot for most people. Sure you can stay in a/ced offices a lot but most people do want to enjoy the outdoors sometimes and summers there are just brutal.

    It isn't the only thing that matters but it IS a thing that matters to many people.

    I don't see it ever competing with #SiliconValley for that reason.

    1. Re:weather by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      Summers in Phoenix do suck, but frankly the mostly-dry summers of Phoenix are infinitely more tolerable than summers in the South or in the mid-West.

    2. Re:weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess if you're a fat neckbeard, yeah, the weather in Phoenix is hard to cope with.

      On the other hand, if you're fit and enjoy outdoor activity, then your only real needs for summer in phoenix are sunscreen & water, plus sensible scheduling of strenuous outdoor activities for off-peak hours.

    3. Re:weather by Antipater · · Score: 2
      I've never understood "x is too hot" arguments. Personally, I like warm weather and despise the cold. I can't stand the feeling of freezing my nose hairs off in winter. I'm sitting in the middle of a Houston summer right now and it barely bothers me - I get to go to the pool after work every day and it feels great (and no, I'm not a Houston native).

      I see this all the time though. "Nobody wants to work there, it's too hot!" Never "Nobody wants to work there, it's too cold!" Am I so much in the minority that it's never even considered that people might want a warm climate?

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    4. Re:weather by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Spring in Phoenix sucks; summers are flat-out intolerable.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:weather by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      If you stay in the machine room, you'll be comfy all year long.

      Sprinting to the car might be a problem, though. I get that.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:weather by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      Sure. Whatever. I get sick of pointing this out to folks. Sure, back east you may - occasionally - get near 100 degrees. We are over 100 degrees from about 10am till about 9pm or later for 3 months out of the year. The LOWS stay in the mid 80's and low 90's. Sure - it's a dry heat, but ya know what, your lungs feel like they are scorching. I had a vegetable garden once where the veggies cooked on the vine - in October.

      Granted - February is wonderful. But you pay for it.

    7. Re:weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90 degrees with 70-80% humidity is way worse than 100 degrees and 10-20% humidity, champ.

      Quit your crying, Phoenix weather is pretty fucking awesome. Drink water, lay off the caffeine, and wear sunscreen, and you'll be fine. That dry heat means that you get to cool off through evaporation - the folks "back east" don't have that luxury, because sweat doesn't evaporate, you just end up with your balls stuck to your leg and 3 gallons of ass-and-taint-flavored sweat soaking into the seat of your pants.

      If you're so dainty that you can't take the Phoenix heat, you should probably move to the Bay area with the rest of the limp-wristed power bottoms.

    8. Re:weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no limit to how much clothing you can put on when it's cold.
      There is both a physical and a cultural limit to how much you can take off when its hot.

      Also, frozen nose hairs on your coworkers smell a lot better than sweat.

    9. Re:weather by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. I spent a summer in Oregon 20 yrs ago and it was routinely 95-100 degrees with 80-90% humidity. Not to bad because it was only that hot for a couple hours a day. And it rained. And there was a breeze. NONE of which you get in Phoenix. It's 100-110 for 12 hours a day. Pounding sun that feels like a physical blow and no breeze to "evaporate the sweat". It feels like a convection oven.

    10. Re:weather by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Also, frozen nose hairs on your coworkers smell a lot better than sweat.

      Do they? I honestly could never tell, because MY NOSE WAS FROZEN.

      On the clothing point, if I'm outside for more than ten seconds, it's because I'm doing something physical, and I'd much rather do that in shorts and a tank top than bundled head-to-toe like a medieval knight. And I'd rather be doing it with other people in skimpy clothing than other people who look like shapeless lumps of padding.

      In addition, it's a lot easier to drive in a warm climate. An A/C doesn't have a start-up period, so even on the hottest days my car will cool to room temp within 10-15 seconds of starting it. In freezing weather you have to sit there, still bundled up and looking like the Michelin man, for the 3-4 minutes until the engine warms up enough that the heater will work (and that's after the five minutes spent scraping ice!).

      I will concede one point, and that's that shoveling snow made me a lot more money as a kid than mowing lawns ever did.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    11. Re:weather by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      so even on the hottest days my car will cool to room temp within 10-15 seconds of starting it.

      What kind of A/C system do you have in your car that can take a 150+ degree internal temperature and bring it down to 72degrees in 10-15 seconds? When it's 110+ outside, it's going to be considerably hotter inside your car.

    12. Re:weather by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between 102 and 106F. That feeling like your eyeballs are on fire when you walk outside? That's Phoenix.

    13. Re:weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true man. A man who has such conviction in his beliefs that he posts as AC.

      (Don't worry; I see the irony. I just stay AC when it gets personal.)

    14. Re:weather by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Most humans don't like temperatures that are hotter than their body temperature; it's pretty hard to stay cool, and it's extremely easy to get heatstroke.

      In cold weather, if you're cold, you can just put on some more clothes; as long as it's above 0F, it's really not that bad. When it's 120 degrees outside, there isn't much you can do to cool down except stay inside all day in the A/C.

    15. Re:weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called parking the shade, cracking the windows and owning a light-colored car.

    16. Re:weather by Antipater · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it is probably longer than 15s to actually bring the temp all the way down. But the air coming out is immediately cold, and the moving cold air makes the car feel much cooler than it probably is. That's compared to a start in cold weather, where it takes multiple minutes for the air coming out of the vents to be warm at all, let alone bring the temp all the way up.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    17. Re:weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprinting to the car might be a problem, though. I get that.

      I see you haven't had the experience. Let me elaborate; the sprint is the good part.

      After the sprint, you fumble the remote in your gloved hand to get the door unlocked, and hope it hasn't frozen shut. Then you climb inside of the freezing car; since you're no longer moving, but still in the cold, you start to shiver. Next, try to slot a key into the ignition with your shivering hand. Once the car is started, you have a few minutes before the heater actually will start to produce heat. If it snowed, you then get back out into the cold and start brushing and scraping the snow and ice off the outside of the car. If it didn't snow, you turn on the radio, sit in the cold, and watch frost form on the inside of the windows from your breath (it might accumulate on top of ice that's already in there). Wipe and scrape the frost off the windows so you can actually see something outside of the car. Turn on the heater, hoping you've waited long enough to not get a blast of cold air in the face. If you have, the defroster will now start to catch up with the new frost buildup on the windows. If it's been snowing hard enough, you get out to give the front and rear windows one more brushing. A few minutes from now, the car will be warm enough that the window frost is gone and won't reform. Until then, you try to drive and shiver at the same time while peering through tiny clear spots on the windows that you have to keep re-clearing with your hands.

      Yes, I'm one of those people who despise northern winter. Call me crazy. Phoenix can move their heat island here, please.

    18. Re:weather by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Ok...

      First, I was referring to the sprint to the car for the neckbeards on Phoenix. Not frozen North types.

      Second, I lived my first 51 years on Maine. Please do not try to educate me further on cold weather driving. I did 60,000mi/yr for over 12 winters, on call. In any weather.

      You forgot to point out that getting the car running, scraping of the ice, and warming the cabin is merely the beginning. Then you must blast your way through the snowbank left by repeated passes of the street plow, having been thawed and refrozen by salt and the sun, since you are leaving after sundown, usually about 4pm at best. Overtime results on doing this long after sundown.

      And thus gets you on the road, where if the black ice, packed snow at the intersections, or downhill runs don't get you, the idiots in their shiny SUVs will

      I don't mind the heat .

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  9. No, it isn't. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For over a decade people keep saying "X" will be the next Silicon Valley. And they then go on and forget they made such ridiculous predictions and nobody every calls them on it.

    FYI The next Silicon Valley continues to be Silicon Valley, as it reinvents itself (and replacing itself with something even more inexplicable the next time.)

    So now you know. And you can quote me on it.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only the Valley could cut its property prices by like 80%, then they might survive the next decade and still be on top :P. I'm sorry, but the cost of living there is just outrageous compared to more-reasonable places that are also full of hackers and startups.

    2. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After living in Austin for the last year I've concluded that that property price is worth paying in the valley! Absolutely no question about it.

    3. Re:No, it isn't. by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

      Especially in the days of broadband connections. Lots of startups don't need to have everyone together. Many do.

      But Silicon Valley has everything to do with having a critical mass of talent. That's pretty much it. Besides the weather, I don't think anyone would start it there if it wasn't there already.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    4. Re:No, it isn't. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      If only the Valley could cut its property prices by like 80%, then they might survive the next decade and still be on top :P. I'm sorry, but the cost of living there is just outrageous compared to more-reasonable places that are also full of hackers and startups.

      Name one.

      There's a reason why it's cheaper to live in Hicksville. It sucks out there. There's nothing to do.

      There's a reason why it's expensive in the valley. It's awesome. It's where you can walk out of a tech job and still have thousands of other companies in the same field in the same metropolitan area that you can apply to. It's where you can go for lunch and overhear intelligent conversations everywhere. It has a buzz thanks to being full of people bouncing ideas off of each other and venture capital not too far away if investors see an opportunity that might go somewhere. It's where it's at. It has a pleasant climate. It has great outdoor pursuits close by. There's stuff to do. People want to live here.

      "The valley" is not a sentient being with the power to "cut its property prices by like 80%", it's a highly south-after location and the wages in the place make it possible to live here.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:No, it isn't. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The solution is sleeping tubes. Or arcologies. Possibly arcologies full of sleeping tubes.

    6. Re:No, it isn't. by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the residents of Hicksville, NY will say otherwise. Cost of living isn't cheap and there is plenty to do nearby. If not, NYC is a short train ride away.

    7. Re:No, it isn't. by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like New York, except with the downside of it being in California.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    8. Re:No, it isn't. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      And if you think SV is expensive try central London even in a grotty central area like old street prices in London (UK) are way higher.

    9. Re:No, it isn't. by Necroman · · Score: 1

      Why, what's wrong with Austin? It's a pretty decent city, though it has some more suburban sprawl than compared to california (since they have the land to do it in Austin).

      Also, if you moved to Austin before last years heat wave, I do feel sorry for you. Last year was the worst summer I've seen down here in the 10 years I've been here.

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    10. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except New York is a crowded smelly shithole unlike most of the glorious sunny California.

      Stay delusional, madfriend!

    11. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that Austin is bad, it's just that the bay area is worth the premium. The weather in Austin is pretty poor, the landscape is dull, the city is a messy sprawl and the town centre feels like it's had no investment outside of the odd tall building for 30 years.

    12. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It could be worse, it could be in New York.

    13. Re:No, it isn't. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Yep, spent ten years there, made a lot of money, had some great experiences.

      And then, when I was ready to, like, buy a house, and live in a place where I'd actually want my kids to grow up, I moved to another state.

      Give yourself time, you may find yourself feeling the same way.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:No, it isn't. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why it's cheaper to live in Hicksville. It sucks out there. There's nothing to do.

      Then why are Californians relocating here (the midwest) in droves? Oh, yea - because they can pretend to be rich (a 2/bed 1.5/bath ranch house that would cost you over a million in Cali goes for less than $200,000 easy around here), and midwestern governments don't have to tax the shit out of residents to pay for taking care of 8 million illegals.

      As for there being "nothing to do," I'm not sure where you get that notion; we get the same movies/music/etc as everywhere else... Plus, unlike Cali, we get to play with guns and 4x4's pretty much unfettered.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    15. Re:No, it isn't. by gauauu · · Score: 1

      If only the Valley could cut its property prices by like 80%, then they might survive the next decade and still be on top :P. I'm sorry, but the cost of living there is just outrageous compared to more-reasonable places that are also full of hackers and startups.

      Name one.

      Champaign-Urbana.

      Cost of living is pretty cheap, there are lots of high-tech jobs (most people I know say the companies they work for are currently trying to hire programmers!), it's easy to get around, and being a town with a large university (including one of the highest populations of foreign students), there are a lot of interesting thing to do, ranging from classical performances (plays, ballets, orchestras), bar and band nightlife, family activities, to geek events (a hip "maker-space", engineering competitions and meetings, etc). There are lots of smart people around as well, including a lot of geeks from all fields. (I recently had a random conversation about ESR's Cathedral and Bazaar with a stranger at the library!)

      The only problem is the weather, which sucks. It's hot and miserable in the summer, and cold and miserable in the winter. Spring and fall are great for the whole 2 weeks that they last.

    16. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And without the salaries to match.

    17. Re:No, it isn't. by slippyblade · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a reason why it's expensive in the valley. It's awesome. It's where you can walk out of a tech job and still have thousands of other companies in the same field in the same metropolitan area that you can apply to. It's where you can go for lunch and overhear intelligent conversations everywhere. It has a buzz thanks to being full of people bouncing ideas off of each other and venture capital not too far away if investors see an opportunity that might go somewhere. It's where it's at. It has a pleasant climate. It has great outdoor pursuits close by. There's stuff to do. People want to live here.

      Where the heck do you live? I've been in Phoenix most of my life and the place you are describing is not Phoenix. Go for lunch and overhear intelligent conversations? Good lord, every conversation I hear in this place is in barely intelligible and broken English - and that's from the citizens! Most of the illegals speak better than the high school grads around here. The climate sucks. Phoenix is a case study in urban sprawl and heat bubble affects. Outdoor pursuits, really? There are outdoor pursuits as long as you get in your car with air conditioning and drive somewhere ELSE.

    18. Re:No, it isn't. by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but the cost of living there is just outrageous compared to more-reasonable places that are also full of hackers and startups.

      If those places become the next SV in terms of startup activity, they will become the next SV in terms of cost of living.

      The only hope is that the "geniuses" of the tech industry will figure out how to use their own innovations to free themselves of the idiotic proposition of concentrating themselves into tiny geographic areas.

    19. Re:No, it isn't. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Name one.

      Boston!

    20. Re:No, it isn't. by xevioso · · Score: 1

      You could have moved to Pacifica. There are plenty of places in the Bay Area not as expensive as SV.

    21. Re:No, it isn't. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      but the cost of living there is just outrageous compared to more-reasonable places that are also full of hackers and startups.

      Name one.

      Austin.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    22. Re:No, it isn't. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Pacifica is nice. But where I moved was still cheaper, and besides, I was getting tired of California politics.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    23. Re:No, it isn't. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Name one.

      Boston!

      Boston's great if you like abrasive people with an unbearable accent.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    24. Re:No, it isn't. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

      As for there being "nothing to do," I'm not sure where you get that notion; we get the same movies/music/etc as everywhere else... Plus, unlike Cali, we get to play with guns and 4x4's pretty much unfettered.

      The fact that you consider movies and music to be the sum total of "things to do" says it all.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    25. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What else is there to do? Go eat at some hipster fag restauraunt? Stare at the shitty polluted ocean? Get beat up by a nigger in your crackhead infested shithole of a city?

    26. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austin isn't as cheap as it was even just a few years ago. It's changing pretty quickly. As things are today - Austin is where Californians come to feel wealthy...and they're driving the prices up pretty quickly. (And buying metric crap-tons of BMW's apparently. It's getting weird in the bad way.) The surrounding areas and the far reaches of town are still affordable - but downtown and in the decent neighborhoods near campus...not so much.

    27. Re:No, it isn't. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's where you can go for lunch and overhear intelligent conversations everywhere.

      I live in the Phoenix area, and one thing you will almost NEVER overhear here is an intelligent conversation.

    28. Re:No, it isn't. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Um, I think he was talking about the Bay Area aka Silicon Valley. I live in Phoenix too, and you're right about everything you said there.

      To be fair, though, there are some nice desert parks here in and around the city that are fun to hike in, for about 2 months out of the year at the very most.

    29. Re:No, it isn't. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      That's precisely my point. It says in big letters at the start of the paragraph "the valley". Do try to keep up.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    30. Re:No, it isn't. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't be an ass, I knew perfectly well that you were talking about Silicon Valley since the quote you included mentioned it, and you even mentioned "thousands of other companies in the same field", something Phoenix does not have. I was just pointing out that Phoenix, the subject of TFA, does not have anything like intelligent conversations, a sentiment echoed by another person who replied to your post. Do try to keep up.

    31. Re:No, it isn't. by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      I'd bet you've never been to Boston. While some have a nearly-unintelligible accent, they were far from abrasive. In comparison to New York or Los Angeles, the people in Boston are really nice. They're even generally nicer than people from San Francisco, in my experience.

      I'd say their share of sharp technical people is at least comparable to Silicon Valley. The hacker universe seems to orbit around these two regions.

    32. Re:No, it isn't. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I take no chances. I shoot first and ask questions later. I have a zero tolerance policy for sloppy reading on /., you were simply an unfortunate victim of mistaken identity.

      Carry on.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    33. Re:No, it isn't. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I've been to Boston many times and have had many dealings with Boston people. I cannot stand them. They are abrasive, they are rude, and and I fucking hate them.

      Carry on.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    34. Re:No, it isn't. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      If you stay away from anything related to sports, you'll notice a significant improvement in the asshole-ishness. Not dealing with rich, snobby undergrads from BU and BC also helps. The tech neighborhoods around MIT in Cambridge are usually fine.

    35. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget "playing with guns"

    36. Re:No, it isn't. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but the cost of living there is just outrageous compared to more-reasonable places that are also full of hackers and startups.

      If those places become the next SV in terms of startup activity, they will become the next SV in terms of cost of living.

      The only hope is that the "geniuses" of the tech industry will figure out how to use their own innovations to free themselves of the idiotic proposition of concentrating themselves into tiny geographic areas.

      You may live in a tiny little hose on a tiny little lot, but Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, Alameda, Marin and many other counties are rich in huge, open space parks. I should know, I spend half my life in them =).

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    37. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why it's cheaper to live in Hicksville. It sucks out there. There's nothing to do.

      Then why are Californians relocating here (the midwest) in droves?

      They aren't. I have data to demonstrate this.

      I moved from San Jose to upstate NY about eight years ago. I was curious how common my situation was, so I took my address book from that time and found the current location of everyone I knew in San Jose back then. I was an AE for an EDA company, so I met people in two dozen companies as part of my job. I also included about 40 friends I made while living there. Out of about 150 contacts in my address book from the time I lived in San Jose, about 120 are still there more than ten years later. One was a grad student at Berkley. He is now a professor at UIUC. All the others now live in India, except for two who live in Taiwan.

      Out of 151 people, one moved to the midwest (UIUC in Urbana, Illinois). One (me) moved to upstate NY, hated it, and moved to Boston MA. You are full of shit :)

      Oh, yea - because they can pretend to be rich (a 2/bed 1.5/bath ranch house that would cost you over a million in Cali goes for less than $200,000 easy around here), and midwestern governments don't have to tax the shit out of residents to pay for taking care of 8 million illegals.

      I thought I was going to be better off in a small town in upstate NY, because the cost of living was so much lower. I was wrong. In the valley I could walk ten feet in any direction and hit a company that would love to hire me. My employer knew that, and paid me to stay (at least a 10% raise every year, and incentives to stay that were worth about 60% of my salary). In upstate NY I would have to move to get a new job with comparable pay. When management knows you can't leave without selling your house, you don't get nice raises. The smart people leave fast, and the coworkers you have are the people who were not smart enough to go.

      In spite of the higher housing prices and taxes, I am about 500k$ poorer today than I would be if I had stayed in San Jose. I base this on the assumption that I would have been promoted at the average rate of the people I looked up (LinkedIn is a wonderful tool for finding the resume of people you used to work with), and the pay I was offered when I interviewed with several companies in the East bay last year (I did this analysis when I was considering moving back).

      As for there being "nothing to do," I'm not sure where you get that notion; we get the same movies/music/etc as everywhere else...

      The idea that music and movies are "what there is to do" makes it clear that you have never lived anywhere interesting. Go visit a city where you know someone, and ask them for ideas. A city may not be for you, but you can't find out if you have no idea what a city is like.

      Plus, unlike Cali, we get to play with guns and 4x4's pretty much unfettered.

      Have you ever been to california? There were two shooting ranges my coworkers liked, and one of them lived in the Santa Cruz mountains just south of Los Gatos so that he could live in the woods and practice marksmanship in his backyard.

    38. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need to remove the PHBs first.

    39. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next Silicon Valley continues to be Silicon Valley,

      It's because the investors keep putting their cash into the Valley. It took billions to start the valley, no one's going to do that type of investment nowadays unless it's a sure thing.

      Well maybe Bill Gates, but still, it took a huge investment into the Valley at the beginning--who's willing to do that today?

    40. Re:No, it isn't. by Kergan · · Score: 1

      A few train stops away from NYC is way too far already. The maximum distance you want to live away from TriBeCa is whatever distance you can walk yourself home when drunk late at night.

    41. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texas allows Non Compete clauses.....
      Part of the reason silicon valley is what it is is that non-competes are not allowed in California.

    42. Re:No, it isn't. by Soporific · · Score: 1

      As for there being "nothing to do," I'm not sure where you get that notion; we get the same movies/music/etc as everywhere else... Plus, unlike Cali, we get to play with guns and 4x4's pretty much unfettered.

      Have you ever been to California? The desert here is pretty much full of guns and 4x4's. Heck I live in the middle of Orange County and can get off road in 15 minutes. Ever skied and surfed in the same day? Not gonna happen in Hicksville.

      ~S

    43. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree there's no such thing as a "next Silicon Valley" that is not Silicon Valley. But if we have to point to a "Silicon Valley Junior", I'd say Seattle is pretty damn spot on.

      Of course it's only for the weird mutants like me, who doesn't need the sun.

    44. Re:No, it isn't. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Name one.

      Cambridge, Massachusetts

    45. Re:No, it isn't. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      They aren't. I have data to demonstrate this...I took my address book from that time and found the current location of everyone I knew in San Jose back then.

      "The plural of anecdote is not data."
      - Roger Brinner

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    46. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, what's wrong with Austin?

      Aside from being in Texas?

    47. Re:No, it isn't. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      As for there being "nothing to do," I'm not sure where you get that notion; we get the same movies/music/etc as everywhere else... Plus, unlike Cali, we get to play with guns and 4x4's pretty much unfettered.

      The fact that you consider movies and music to be the sum total of "things to do" says it all.

      Where did I make that specification? Oh, yea, I didn't, you're assuming, and making silly assumptions at that, considering that the portion of my post you copied in your reply includes venues of entertainment other than movies and music...

      TL;DR, I assume?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    48. Re:No, it isn't. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      There's a reason why it's cheaper to live in Hicksville. It sucks out there. There's nothing to do.

      Then why are Californians relocating here (the midwest) in droves?

      They aren't. I have data to demonstrate this.

      I moved from San Jose to upstate NY about eight years ago...

      Since when does "upstate NY" qualify as part of the midwest?? What a maroon...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    49. Re:No, it isn't. by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Outdoor pursuits, really? There are outdoor pursuits as long as you get in your car with air conditioning and drive somewhere ELSE.

      Try hiking to the top of Squaw Peak and/or Camelback. When I lived in PHX, I did that every few days. Great exercise, great views.

      I miss Phoenix.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    50. Re:No, it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya, those awful downsides like not having to deal with stifling summer heat and humidity, or hurricanes, or winter snow, unless you want to drive a couple hours to REAL mountains with REAL skiing or snowboarding.

  10. Why is the cost of living lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nobody in their right mind wants to live in Phoenix. Too hot and far from anything naturally green.

    Solar power in Phoenix is great though.

    1. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flagstaff is green...

      The White Mountains are beautiful and... green.

      Haters gonna hate! I love living in Phoenix. I've been here going on thirteen years, and I'll never move back east. Ever.

    2. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by metrometro · · Score: 1

      Well, that and it's not bounded on three sides by water.

    3. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      Yep - all those places are green and pleasant. So why live in Phoenix? I don't get it - folks say Phoenix is so nice, you can go to those other places! Why live in a toilet just because the living room is nice?

    4. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are describing pretty much the whole country. Only thing still green around the middle part is trees. The grass, plants, brush, and crops are brown and dormant like it's late october or november.

    5. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by CubicleZombie · · Score: 2

      Nothing is green in Silicon Valley either, unless somebody waters it. I remember not being allowed to water a lawn or wash a car when I lived there, so everything was brown.

      --
      :wq
    6. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that. Phoenix is a 3-4 hour drive away from those nice places like Prescott, Flagstaff, etc. Back on the east coast, a 3-4 drive will take you all the way to the next state or more. Saying Phoenix is nice because of Flagstaff is like saying Philly is nice because of Maine.

    7. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Nothing is green in Silicon Valley either, unless somebody waters it.

      If you want green move to Seattle or Portland. Of course, there's a reason it's green. It's overcast and rainy all the time.

    8. Re:Why is the cost of living lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not "brown", it's "golden" :)

      and in the "winter" (you know - that's when it's 65 and rainy, while NY and other places have to dig themselves out of the snow), it's actually pretty green here.

      An average winter day in the Valley is probably stil nicer than a summer day in Seattle... ;)

      (Captcha: Apricot)

  11. Fuck no... by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

    I won't go.

  12. Kansas City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Realistically, Kansas City is probably the next Silicon Valley due to the Gigabyte Internet.

    1. Re:Kansas City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chattanooga has had Gigabit fiber internet for a while now and has seen no substantial tech growth. Kansas City isn't the best town (like the whole state of AZ) to be caught in as a non-christian caucasian.

    2. Re:Kansas City by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      Kansas City isn't the best town (like the whole state of AZ) to be caught in as a non-christian caucasian.

      As a lifetime 'non-christian caucasian' and Missouri resident, living not far from KC, I say, without doubt, that you are full of shit.

      Take your coastal elitism and shove it up your hindside.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Kansas City by vlm · · Score: 1

      Take your coastal elitism and shove it up your hindside.

      but... but... but... coastal elitism is the only advantage the coasts have !

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Kansas City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should have been "non-christian non-caucasian"

    5. Re:Kansas City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I heard they eat Jews in Kansas City.

      They're pretty famous for it, actually - Kansas City Jew Ribeye is a specialty at a lot of steakhouses.

      (Or, if you prefer bluntness: stop your bitching. KC is a big city much like any other big city in America. It's clear you've never visited, because you seem to think that rural, backwoods attitudes are prevalent there - they're not.)

    6. Re:Kansas City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kansas City isn't the best town (like the whole state of AZ) to be caught in as a non-christian caucasian.

      As a lifetime 'non-christian caucasian' and Missouri resident, living not far from KC, I say, without doubt, that you are full of shit. .

      As a 'non-christian caucasian' and Missouri resident, living not far from KC, I say, without a doubt, that AC is not full of shit. Things have improved since I've been here but still.... there is the very definite odour of fundamentalist evangelical christianity. And the mormons, christ! Yes, jebus is coming back to Independence so lets build him a spiral staircase

    7. Re:Kansas City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And oceans, and mountains, and good education, and good transportation, and better weather, and less christians, less fat people, better food, better art, better music, more sports, more outdoor activities, more diversity.

      Wait ... what did the fly over states have again ? Bigger houses and more space. Exactly what innovative people dont chase. Hmmm.

    8. Re:Kansas City by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That sounds exactly like Phoenix actually: mormons and fundies are everywhere here (along with illegals and meth-heads).

    9. Re:Kansas City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The coasts wouldn't be "coastal elitists" if you people living in the, shall we say, "tribal areas" didn't act like a bunch of fucking Taliban. Stop being racist, homophobic, bible thumping, no education, no talent shitbags and maybe the coasts won't consider you trash!

    10. Re:Kansas City by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Kansas City isn't the best town (like the whole state of AZ) to be caught in as a non-christian caucasian.

      As a lifetime 'non-christian caucasian' and Missouri resident, living not far from KC, I say, without doubt, that you are full of shit. .

      As a 'non-christian caucasian' and Missouri resident, living not far from KC, I say, without a doubt, that AC is not full of shit. Things have improved since I've been here but still.... there is the very definite odour of fundamentalist evangelical christianity. And the mormons, christ! Yes, jebus is coming back to Independence so lets build him a spiral staircase

      Are you sure you're not talking about Branson? At least KC doesn't have annual hate conventions...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    11. Re:Kansas City by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      And oceans, and mountains, and good education, and good transportation, and better weather, and less christians, less fat people, better food, better art, better music, more sports, more outdoor activities, more diversity.

      Wait ... what did the fly over states have again ?

      Judging from your post, a lack of narcissistic douche-bags, apparently...

      Love the irony of AC responding to a post criticizing coastal elitism with... wait for it... coastal elitism!

      Classy.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  13. Perfect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to do but work!

  14. Mr. Bond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is if we get that big earthquake we've been expecting.

  15. Confused... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

    I thought the ubiquity of high-speed internet access almost everywhere eliminated the need for centering technological progress around a particular geography...

    Also, heat is bad for electronics, so why in the name of everything holy would tech startups want to base themselves in an area that regularly experiences triple-digit temperatures?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar power, lots of solar power. A data center in alaska could do away with AC, but servers still need power. A data center in arizona, sure it would need ac, but its dry (low risk of condensing issues which are a pain for AC systems), and there's lot of sun. Green data centers are all the rage.

    2. Re:Confused... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I thought the ubiquity of high-speed internet access almost everywhere eliminated the need for centering technological progress around a particular geography...

      With a company there will be a physical location. You want that physical location to be where the talent is.

      Also, heat is bad for electronics, so why in the name of everything holy would tech startups want to base themselves in an area that regularly experiences triple-digit temperatures?

      You loose less days of productivity due to weather in high temperature areas vs snow areas.

      I've lived in a place that gets to -50 F in the winter and climbs to 110 F in the summer. Trust me, a day that is 110 is a lot better than a day that is -50.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a neat thing here called Air Conditioning.

    4. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lower employee salaries
      Lower real estate costs
      Much lower employment taxes than CA
      complete lack of natural disasters (no earthquakes, tornados, hurricanes etc)

      Several large companies have one or more datacenter in the phoenix area including ebay, godaddy, Intel, American express, sprint, and more...there are also several Colo providers.

    5. Re:Confused... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I thought the ubiquity of high-speed internet access almost everywhere eliminated the need for centering technological progress around a particular geography...

      With a company there will be a physical location. You want that physical location to be where the talent is.

      So, in a country with a 360 million+ population, you're telling me there are zero talented people outside northern California? Somehow I find that difficult to fathom... probably because it's complete bullshit.

      Also, heat is bad for electronics, so why in the name of everything holy would tech startups want to base themselves in an area that regularly experiences triple-digit temperatures?

      You loose less days of productivity due to weather in high temperature areas vs snow areas.

      Protip: Want to be taken seriously? Make sure you spell and grammar check. FYI, It's spelled l-o-s-e, not l-o-o-s-e. / grammar Nazi rant

      I've lived in a place that gets to -50 F in the winter and climbs to 110 F in the summer. Trust me, a day that is 110 is a lot better than a day that is -50.

      Careful, I think I hear the Hyperbole Police coming, to drag you off to Exaggeration-traz...

      Seriously, though, you do realize there exist many, many temperate regions that stay between the temperature extremes you've mentioned, right? I.e., the vast majority of America.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re:Confused... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Phoenix is blessed with abundant electrical suppies form several directions. If you want redundant power, it's here.

      Residential outages are always weather-related. Wind especially will cause problems. But for a data center, it's very good. and the risk of floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, etc is low. Building up a few feet removes the risk of even local monsoon flooding.

      A much safer environment than even rural Virginia.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:Confused... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      So, in a country with a 360 million+ population, you're telling me there are zero talented people outside northern California? Somehow I find that difficult to fathom... probably because it's complete bullshit.

      You interpreted what I said in the most wrong way you could. You basically said that a physical location basically isn't needed because there is high-speed internet. I dis-agreed that physical location is not needed and specified that you want the physical location to be where talent is, I did not specify a location other than "where the talent is".

      Protip: Want to be taken seriously? Make sure you spell and grammar check. FYI, It's spelled l-o-s-e, not l-o-o-s-e. / grammar Nazi rant

      Protip: Want to be taken seriously? Don't use "Protip" and don't be a SPELLING Nazi.

      Careful, I think I hear the Hyperbole Police coming, to drag you off to Exaggeration-traz...

      Damnit, you are right, when I double checked the temperatures the high only got to 96 F. Off by 14 degrees.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Piney,_Wyoming

      Seriously, though, you do realize there exist many, many temperate regions that stay between the temperature extremes you've mentioned, right? I.e., the vast majority of America.

      Yes, I have lived in many states and a province. In the debate of Cold vs Hot I choose Hot. I have been to hell and it is cold.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    8. Re:Confused... by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be in snow than heat. You can always put on more clothes, you reach a point where you CAN'T take off anything else without going to jail. Not to mention, jacket and tie in 117 degrees is near suicide.

    9. Re:Confused... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be in snow than heat.

      Have you ever not been able to get out of your driveway because there is three feet of heat covering everything?

      You can always put on more clothes, you reach a point where you CAN'T take off anything else without going to jail.

      There is specialized clothing you can buy that makes it bearable to be in -50F. There is also specialized clothing that makes it more bearable to be in triple digit weather. In both cases if you are not correctly dressed your life can be in danger.

      Not to mention, jacket and tie in 117 degrees is near suicide.

      Yea, I would consider suicide also if I had to wear a jacket and tie.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    10. Re:Confused... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Also, heat is bad for electronics

      The only piece of "electronics" I've had fail where I suspected the heat as the cause was the alternator in my old Ford Bronco, during June 2 or 3 summers in a row. You know what's really bad for electronics, and metal in general? Humidity. We don't have that here for much of the year. That's why our cars don't rust and our masonry doesn't crumble. It just gets a little dust on it from time to time.

      why in the name of everything holy would tech startups want to base themselves in an area that regularly experiences triple-digit temperatures?

      Maybe because we don't store our valuables and equipment in the parking lot. We DO have buildings here, you know.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    11. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A data center in Arizona wouldn't need much in the way of AC if it situated itself underground, or in caves. Sure, you have excavation costs and construction costs that are expensive, but cooling becomes quite reasonable once you're down 10 feet or more, and have earth above you acting as an insulator.

    12. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just on the "talent" issue. Of course there's talent everywhere, but those who are driven will migrate to where the jobs are, so there's a higher concentration of "transplants" in Silicon Valley that raises the average talent pool and why SV is a positive feedback loop that's hard for alternate cities to challenge.

    13. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also specialized clothing that makes it more bearable to be in triple digit weather.

      No, there isn't. Retard.

    14. Re:Confused... by Kergan · · Score: 1

      Nah, you can't know what cold is until you spent a winter in blistering-fucking-cold-and-humid-to-the-bone-marrow Quebec. But agreed: hell is *very* cold.

    15. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the ubiquity of high-speed internet access almost everywhere eliminated the need for centering technological progress around a particular geography...

      I have tried it three times, in three jobs. It doesn't work. Video chat is almost good enough to have a technical discussion, but sitting with a coworker and a whiteboard avoids so many problems that not having programmers see each other in person is suicide for a business.

  16. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you're white, otherwise you better carry a few forms of ID and learn to follow the officers instructions completely

    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to get into a political argument, but comments like this crack me up.

      Everyone should be carrying a few forms of ID and should follow an officer's instructions completely, no matter what your race is. Being white doesn't release me from having to prove my identity, and doing what a law enforcement officer says.

      The only people that need to take special precautions are people who aren't suppose to be in the USA.

    2. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they were born brown

    3. Re:Maybe by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

      Everyone should be carrying a few forms of ID

      What the fuck? Since when? Unless you're driving or at the airport who gives a shit?

  17. By the time I get to Phoenix she'll be rising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Til single homes are way out of my price range!

  18. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, all of the "batshit crazy teatards" basically comes FROM Phoenix. The rest of the state is relatively sane, but sadly, as Phoenix is large enough to enforce its will on the rest of the state...we all end up looking stupid.

  19. Why don't people just... by BorisSkratchunkov · · Score: 0

    ... move to Utica, NY instead! A rust belt metropolis formerly specializing in the textile industry and the Erie Canal, Utica is perfect for your start up! There are no people to get in your way and nothing else for that matter, and hell- if the internet is geography independent, why not? Come to Utica today! It could be a bustling place... maybe... Utica: "Like being dead, but without the fun." --http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=utica

  20. Oh please by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

    Betteridge's Law of Headlines applies.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  21. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by mythosaz · · Score: 2

    The portrait that the national media likes to paint of Arizona is fairly inaccurate - especially when it comes to the people working in technology.

    It's an outdated, overplayed stereotype.  Idiot local politicians on the right like to rattle their sabers to garner press.  Truth be told, the state is about as balanced with its share of both "normal" people and nutjobs on both sides of the aisle.

    My IT architecture team is a snapshot of diversity.

    The IT arm of my (large) company is fairly representative of IT shops in general -- and the only segregation is among the H1-B types who live/eat/work together, since their teams are often contract-based.

  22. Depends... by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

    It depends on how willing the state and local governments are to creating a culture of startups, especially technically-minded ones. When Gary Johnson was governor of New Mexico, he signed an initiative to entice film producers to move there with lucrative tax rebates that rivaled other states. Since Martinez has taken office, she's done much to dismantle what Richardson and Johnson built. I'm on a listserv with many New Mexico producers and directors that have watched and acted against her backward actions with moderate success. In reality, if any industry wants to be recognized, they must inform the policymakers that their business is a positive economic force ford the local and state government.

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!
    1. Re:Depends... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      It depends on how willing the state and local governments are to creating a culture of startups, especially technically-minded ones. ...lucrative tax rebates...blah...blah...blah ...policymakers...economic force...

      For a culture of start ups, you need people to work there. Simply put, businesses might care about tax rebates, etc, but people, especially young, fresh out of school types needed for a lot of start ups, don't. They'll decide where they want to move to, do so, and then look for a job. Nashville tried all those tricks you mentioned during the first dot com era to get some high tech in. They got some, but a lot of it had to leave simply because there were no workers because even with tempting wages for the region, nobody wanted to live there. If you want a culture for start ups, you need colleges to create young educated people, a music and nightlife to encourage them to live there once they graduate, and culture to keep them.

  23. Pittsburgh by drewstah · · Score: 1

    Pittsburgh would be the next Silicon Valley, if there were any people with money here. I can't get to work without tripping over computer scientists from CMU. Many of the people here are certainly smart and creative enough, but there's no way to get any funding - unless they leave Pittsburgh, and go to the west coast. More than half of the companies I've worked for in Pittsburgh have either closed down, or moved to the west coast - where the money is.

    --
    I do stuff Zhrodague
  24. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful there pardner, you are using reason and logic, the hippies around here don't like that.

  25. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by fm6 · · Score: 1

    And the computer industry employs a lot of immigrants. If I were starting a new company, I'd think twice about locating in a state where a funny accent is likely to draw hassles.

    Responding to the AC who replied previously: this is not about enforcing the laws. This is about dimwitted politicos pandering to bigotry.

  26. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    In a sense, yes. I have a problem with their state people taking the laws into their own hands. There's a reason ICE exists. And frankly, I don't want to be looked at with suspicion for daring to spend the $2500+ I've spent so far (with more to come!) in order to become a lawful permanent resident.

    Also, Joe Arpaio can go fuck himself.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  27. Re:No by zieroh · · Score: 2

    Sounds like he hit a nerve.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  28. "Different quality of life" by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    Yup. It's different alright. It was a concrete jungle almost indistinguishable from LA.

    1. Re:"Different quality of life" by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Only hotter and with bigger power and water supply issues.

    2. Re:"Different quality of life" by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      Water, yes. Power - not so much. We are good with power, in fact we provide a good chunk of California's power. And most of our power is clean - LOTS of hydro here. Well, and a pretty solid nuke-plant.

    3. Re:"Different quality of life" by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      You meant "Only hotter and with bigger power and water supplies."

      Seriously Phoenix has great power and water supplies they just don't get it from the sky very often.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  29. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by localman57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you have no problem with the laws of the US but a problem with the state of Arizona actually enforcing these laws? Fan-friggin-tastic.

    You're missing the point. The fact that Arizona has a cultural image problem with a big hunk of the population is likely to make it more difficult to recruit talent, which is essential to the success or failure of any company, and start-ups in particular. It's hard enough already to lure the top people to your company. Why make it harder? Easier to just locate someplace else. If they like the bed they've made, good for them. The Supreme Court validated the single biggest part of their legislation. But that doesn't mean I, or a lot of the people I hire, suddenly feel like it's a good idea to go live there.

  30. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't "take the law into their own hands." They passed a law that mirrored existing law. Your take on this matter is skewed.

  31. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by zieroh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Speaking only for myself, I have a problem with Arizona enacting (and enforcing) laws that are plainly discriminatory and largely driven by old white men angrily brandishing guns. Arizona is, from my perspective, out of step with the vast majority of These United States.

    But that's just me.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  32. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Arizona really is an embarrassment...
    and no, I'm not the same anonymous coward as the poster above you.

  33. Papieren, Bitte by bigtrike · · Score: 0

    If you haven't done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear from the police state of Arizona.

  34. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Hatta · · Score: 1

    The portrait that the national media likes to paint of Arizona is fairly inaccurate

    Two words: Joe Arpaio.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  35. Funny you should ask... by tool462 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm an electrical engineer in Phoenix who is actively trying to leave. You pretty much have Intel, Honeywell, and Freescale (ha!) on a large scale, a bunch of other companies with satellite offices locally, and some smaller startup types. From the inside, it certainly doesn't feel special relative to any other large city, and there still is nowhere near the density of tech companies that Silicon Valley has. Could it get there? I suppose. But so could Austin, or Seattle, or Irvine, and so on.

    1. Re:Funny you should ask... by TheSpoom · · Score: 2

      I'd bet more on Austin as an up and coming city, personally. Seattle's kind of already there.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Funny you should ask... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Dont forget the large number of data centers in Phoenix. There's probably more 100k square foot plus there then all the rest of the US combined.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Funny you should ask... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Echostar, Insight, and Avnet, to name a few more.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    4. Re:Funny you should ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in Seattle.

      Meh. It has the tech companies but the culture is to hipster-granola-arent-I-cool-for-hating-the-man to be success driven (which is really the missing ingredient in most tech friendly locations). Its almost like they prefer a company that middles along rather than one that booms.

    5. Re:Funny you should ask... by codepunk · · Score: 1

      I did a gig in Austin last summer, what a shit hole city you cannot pay me enough to work there again. When people talk about how cool austin is they mean one block of downtown the rest of the place is a humid, hot shit hole.

      --


      Got Code?
    6. Re:Funny you should ask... by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      As of 10/11, Phoenix had 830K, with plans to add 160K and maybe even a million more feet later. source.

      However, just one building in North Carolina has 500K of space (source), and Apple is by no means alone out there, with at least Google and others. Central Oregon and Washington are also big; Facebook has 300K in Prineville and another 300K on the way. Apple is also building in central Oregon, Google has a large facility, and yahoo and microsoft have large facilities in Central Washington.

      Phoenix is a player, but by no means has "as much DC capacity as the rest of the US combined." They may have more colo space, and more individual 100k+ size units than elsewhere, to but consider all of the domestic DC capacity you are including self-builds in that statement.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    7. Re:Funny you should ask... by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      Seattle definitely there, in spite of Redmond. If I thought there was any potential for Silicon Valley to lose their dominance to another city on the west coast, my money would be on Seattle.

      Phoenix is a second-tier city where you might be able to put data centers, but Boise, Reno, and Denver are almost certainly better choices for these due to at least two of the following: climate, physical internet backbone routes, and taxes.

    8. Re:Funny you should ask... by Soporific · · Score: 1

      Supposedly Irvine actually has a higher number of tech companies in it than Silicon Valley, but that may be a local urban legend. Either way, I wish people would move out. :)

      ~S

    9. Re:Funny you should ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My neighbor works at Intel. He moved here from the Portland OR area about two years ago and he's ready to just up and quit. He's been working for Intel for about ten years now. He describes the internal corporate atmosphere as toxic. He is actively seeking a transfer to anywhere else and is looking at other employers in the industry.

      Likewise, he just does not like Phoenix, which I agree with his assessment. Culturally, Phoenix and the surrounding area is dominated by the old white people who come here to die, much like Florida. There are serious racism problems between the latinos (both legal and illegal), the native Americans, and the white immigrants from other states. Local business are very few and far between; national chains own the state.

      As for myself, as I posted here elsewhere, I am in the process of leaving the state. I have already moved everything I own into storage and am just waiting on some construction issues to get resolved on my home before I sell it and go.

      Arizona, is an intellectual backwater.

    10. Re:Funny you should ask... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't know what that number is from. I personally have worked in more than 800k of Data center space in Phoenix, and I haven't been in even a small percentage of the data centers around. Ebay/Paypaypal is almost half that total and theirs isn't even the largest any more. IO, Wellsfargo, First data, Go Daddy, Amex, DHL, ASU, Motorola all have large data centers here.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  36. Only the retarded use sexual slang by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Home of Joe Arpaio and other batshit crazy teatards.

    How can I tell you are a moron?

    This.

    Your simple inability to use the simple phrase "Tea Party" marks you as an immature jerk. Why would anyone seek to project that image of themselves?

    On a side note, what do you have against reducing the size of government and federal spending? By reducing both you also reduce corruption that inevitable results from too much money being centralized far away from the people who the money comes from.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On a side note, what do you have against reducing the size of government and federal spending?

      What do I have against it?

      I believe everyone should be provided healthcare by the state, because I don't think we can trust private entities to resist the temptation to charge more and more for healthcare services (because they know we HAVE to pay it...).

      I believe the government should regulate what pollutants industry is allowed to dump into the earth/water.

      I believe the government should provide free education to all of its citizens.

      I believe the government should regulate financial industries and banks.

      Frankly, I believe there are MANY things the government should do, because either they are the only ones who can do it, or because the sector should not be trying to make a profit.

      If you want to reduce government, set your sights on the massive "defense" budget. Leave what (limited) social services the USA has alone.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    2. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OK, how about extremist, quasi-fascist, Know Nothing Tea Partiers, that better? It's certainly more accurate though verbose.

      And what sexual slang did I use?

    3. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too much money being centralized far away from the people who the money comes from.

      You are abso-friggin-lutly correct.

      We need to prevent money from being centralized by not just the government, but by 1%ers.
      When money is stagnant like that it hurts the economy.
      Spend it or tax it, either way the money needs to move.

    4. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      The problem with healthcare is that we are constantly finding new methods to treat things, but as usual, the first are always expensive and as soon as a possibility exists something might help, people demand it, regardless of cost.

      Throw away all the expensive equipment we didn't have 20 years ago, and the batteries of expensive experimental drugs and medical costs will plummet.

    5. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Leave what (limited) social services the USA has alone.

      How about the families that have 5-10 children because of the EIC? What about people moving here and claiming all their children and all the children who do not live in this country? What about the people who make min wage and can get pretty much 0 assistance and are better off getting fired? What about the drug dealers who pull in thousands of dollars a week yet are on welfare because they technically do not make anything? What about people who take drugs and then get gov assistance (drugs cost mega money I know I am related to an addict)? These programs are being gamed on a MASSIVE scale the likes of which you have no idea. I personally know people who game it every day and tell me exactly how to do it (I dont because I have a shred of decency).

      If you think that you can solve the budget by just axing the defense budget you are SORELY mistaken. There are 5 cash pigs in this game. Defense, SS, Education, debt obligation, and retirement benefits. All 5 of those will need work if you want to get a semblance of a balanced budget. And remember in 2014 there are all new medicare obligations to take effect.

      Go ahead do the math. Here are the numbers http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Eliminate just the defense budget and then come back and say 'i fixed it'. Or here let me do the math for you. The military is ~650 billion (which is way to high). The deficit is 1.2 trillion. You are short about ~650 billion. Eliminating a good chunk of defense (you do not want to get rid of it all) is a good start. But you *must* look at the other portions of the gov. If you dont you will end up with a debt ridden country with no defense and no one willing to fight as all they want is their '50 acres and a mule'...

      Its very simple. All organizations across the board are going to have to slim down. Taxes will need to go up (across the board). The tax code needs to be thrown out and redone. Right now they are in the bargaining stage of grief (ie only tax the very wealthy, or eliminate program xyz because I dont like it and think its a waste, we can create a tax break for abc...). When we get to acceptance we will start to see some real work done. That is not going to happen in this current bi-partisan environment bickering.

      You think this is not a problem? What if the gov had so much debt no one would loan them money? Where are they going to get it? If that happens, that list of things you like the gov to do, will not happen anymore. That is what you are facing. You can not have everything. You are going to have to grow up and figure out what things you need and are 'nice to haves'. You have said what you do not want. But what of the 'do wants' are you going to have to do without?

    6. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but he was right on. The issue of Joe Arpaio, tea party rallies and general things involving areas near Phoenix result in that I would be unwilling to work or even consider relocating to that area - even for 10-50x my salary. I'm sorry, but with actual people being herpa-derp stupid enough to shoot actual politicians, who would want to associate with such an area? Then you have unfriendly weather climates (hello 120+ degrees).

      Climate issues, politicial issues, general public issues.

    7. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These programs are being gamed on a MASSIVE scale the likes of which you have no idea.

      I'll assume you have some non-anecdotal data to support this statement. Care to share with the rest of us?

    8. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the reasons why Maricopa County leans to the right is due to its high senior population that resides around the fringes of the Phoenix metro area. Grumpy old white people who still wish it was the 1950s. The other reason is due to the high Mormon population around the Mesa area. Outside of those two demographic groups, the county tends to be fairly centralist.

      Also, the weather rarely gets above 115F, and even then only for a few hours in the afternoon. It is often quite pleasant in the mornings and evenings during the summer. So you can plan around extreme temperatures in the summer months. Can you plan around the extreme cold of the midwest or northeast in the winter?

      And the Tucson shooter wasn't herpa-derpa, he was pathologically insane. There is a difference between being chronically stupid and being broken in the head.

      Honestly, I'd love to see more tech move to the metro. Arizona is about a decade behind Colorado in becoming a swing state. It isn't a lost cause the way that Texas is. The more scientists and engineers, the merrier.

    9. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh and just like the people that buy $800 video cards, people who demand the bleeding edge end up reducing the cost of goods and services over time so that everyone gets a better quality of life.

    10. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Genda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is a myth perpetuated by people who pull reasons out of hats and other dark orifices to empty your wallet. If any of this smoke had even a passing hint of reality to it, we would be seeing a global pattern that would bear this out. Such a pattern is embarrassingly absent. Here's what is present,

      Americas spend more for medicine than any people on the planet; per capita: $7,146, as a percentage of GDP: 15.2%
      Our life expectancy is 42 (50th for new borns) in the world falling behind Cuba and Chile, Our child mortality rate is one of the highest in the industrialized world.
      The WHO rated American medicine over all at 72 of 191, being beaten by Mexico, Sri Lanka and Uraguay, but tied in a dead heat with Surinam.
      Medical care is the number 1 reason for bankruptcy being a a significant cause in 46.2% and mentioned in 62.1% of all bankruptcies.
      The United States is one of only 3 industrialize countries (the other two being Mexico and Turkey) on the planet that failed to cover virtually all of their citizens (at least 98.4%) with complete medical coverage. As a result, a 2009 Harvard study reported that 44,900 American's die needlessly every year due to lack of access to affordable medical care.

      We have a ridiculous run away malpractice problem, for profit hospitals that have no problem charging $10 for an antacid tablet that costs less than a penny, semiprivate hospital rooms that can cost $20,000 a day, doctors charging $250 for a 30 second visit, pharmaceutical companies who no longer produce useful drugs, but keep pumping out analogues of prior cash cow meds to keep drug patents and fat profits coming, while at the same time moving heaven and earth to sabotage and undermine the generic drug industry, and a greedy insurance system that gladly spins the whole disaster on and on as it take ever fatter slices for itself. This is the picture of an industry rife with greed, gluttony, payola, bribery and an utter disregard for human life or dignity.

      Anyone who thinks for a moment that this industry doesn't need to be regulated within an inch of its existence, has no clue to the depth and breath of the depravity that has been visited on the American people. It has passed being a bad joke, its beyond obscene, it is now a full on tragedy, a national shame, an indictment of our system of enterprise and government. It is a blight on our children and nothing less than beating it back into a not for profit service designed to protect and promote the health and well being of PEOPLE is an acceptable answer.

    11. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by tranquilidad · · Score: 1

      The issue IS regulation.

      I spent 20 years in Silicon Valley and I've lived in Scottsdale for the last five. It's the regulation and lack of competition that is driving up the cost of health insurance. My health insurance in Arizona is 50% of the cost of a policy in California and I have a lower deductible.

      Why is this? It's because of the mandates imposed by California (state level regulation) and the fact that a Californian can't buy health insurance from out of state (federal level regulation).

      When I first left college I needed health insurance because I was working for myself. Back then I could buy catastrophic coverage and there was a lot of competition. I only wanted catastrophic coverage because I was only concerned about being in an accident and any costs related to some awful, long-term illness. I was delighted with choice - I had my own health insurance at the level I desired.

      That market disappeared when we decided that it's "cheaper" to have preventative care and catch diseases early. California took it much further - in California your insurance company has to provide the same level for addiction related mental health services as is provided for any other medical issue such as cancer. California has something on the order of 50 mandates included in their health insurance regulations and the new Affordable Care Act adds a bunch more. You are paying for those whether or not you want to, whether or not they will ever apply to you and whether or not you agree with their need. You may argue that that's a good thing because it spreads the costs of everyone's healthcare amongst everyone. You're entitled to believe that. I prefer to have wider choice and more options and don't want to have pay for unlimited mental health services for addiction issues or any of the other 50 mandates that California imposes.

      Give me choice. The regulations introduced over the last thirty to forty years have been designed to eliminate choice and availability and have, as a result, increased costs.

    12. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by defaria · · Score: 1

      Defense is a legitimate function for government. It's in the fucking Constitution! Healthcare is not in the Constitution ergo it's not the government's job to do it. That should end the argument but it never does with the havenots who want to steal shit from the haves. BTW: You say you can't trust private entities to resist the temptation to charge more and more for healthcare services? What the fuck do you think will stop the government from doing the same? Both entities are made up of people and thus both can and do succumb to the temptation equally well.

      But the difference is you have many companies you can take your business to and you can do it today. You have only one government providing such a service (and probably pretty badly at that if you ever take the time to examine how well or bad government performs such services. Can you say DMV? USCIS? The "projects"? I knew you could). If you don't like the service they are providing (or not providing) you're just shit out of luck. You have no other entity that you can turn to, and if you do you likely face jail time if your truly resist Uncle Sam. And, you probably won't be able to vote the bastards out for years anyway. Think man! Think!!!

      Plus the government doesn't produce anything - to do so it must first take from the people. When you ask the government to provide education or healthcare what you are really saying is that you want to take other people's money to fund your charity. Fuck you for advocating stealing from others! Penn said it well "Building a library is a good thing. I would even help you build a library. But I would not help you take a gun to your neighbor's head to take his money to help you build a library. And I don't want my government doing anything I wouldn't do".

      You sir are a parasite and an enemy of liberty!

    13. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Genda · · Score: 1

      I get it. You want to know why you should pay for the medical care of lazy, violent, people who in all likelihood weren't even born here. Its a perfectly reasonable questions. Okay, let's do this from a simple focus on sanity. What part of the entire cost of medicine in this country of 350,000,000 people do you think these folk represent (honestly?) 4%? 6%? Let go completely batfsck and say 12%. So you're going to break the back of the honest hard working 88% because you resent having to carry 12% of the population, man I don't know about you, but that sounds frighteningly like cutting off my nose to spite my face.

      Beyond the simple insanity of running the vast majority of the society into the ditch, lets try this, you have a population of poor people, many foreign nationals, without access to proper health care, many involved with intravenous drug use. So now we have an explosion of hepatitis, tuberculosis, HIV, STDs, cholera, malaria, plague and a raft of new virii popping out of the jungles, all singing, all dancing and mutating into virulent strains for which there will be no vaccines or antibiotics. So you saved a buck, how's that compared to the horror you experience when a poor kid from Central America brings some killer bug to school and your kids catches it because little Hernando didn't have access to a free Clinica to clear up his bug early? You're gonna be real proud of the tax money you saved? Bet your neighbors will want to vote you man of the year too.

      I'm not even talking about the humanity, the morality, even the consideration for the quality of life for other human beings. I'm just talking about public frigging health. The ability to work and shop and play without the overriding concern that there's going to be a pandemic that will tear a hole in society large enough to drive a fleet of trucks through. Friend, there's an ebola outbreak going on in Africa right this minute. I'm telling you, the systems we have in place today are no more prepared for a coming global pandemic, than they are to keeping John Q. functional and healthy. Ask any economist, you barrow money when its cheap and abundant, and you pay it back when your economy is booming because you had the vision and wisdom (not to mention accountability to society) to invest in your infrastructure. Now is the time to invest in infrastructure. Anyone who tells you different has a political or ideological axe to grind and you want to know why their hands are behind their back. I understand you're all about personal responsibility. Try as you might, you can't make others responsible. So rather than get pissed off, or self justified, realize you're the one who can determine a future, the poor slobs with needles in their veins are nailed to rails whose destination is titled "Self Destruction". Have a wee bit of compassion, and for sure make certain you don't end up in one of their craters. You're responsible for all of it, your mess, their mess, and all the great stuff too, you have all the say and now all that's called for is just a little wisdom.

    14. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Genda · · Score: 1

      And who passed these ridiculous laws? Legislators, paid for by insurance companies. Insurance companies are not interested in keeping you healthy. They aren't interested in a state for of healthy Californians. They aren't even vaguely interested in making certain that medicine is affordable and accessible to every Californian. They're interested in one thing, and one thing only. Making a profit, and if that happens over your dead and bankrupt body, be poor, then be dead.

    15. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by artor3 · · Score: 1

      How about the families that have 5-10 children because of the EIC?

      Doesn't happen. It's a complete fabrication by right wing demagogues. For starters, EIC only pays for the first three kids. Secondly, the ~$5k you get won't even come close to paying for those kids.

      What about people moving here and claiming all their children and all the children who do not live in this country?

      Again, max of three kids makes this a non-issue. Besides, how often does it happen that parents legally immigrate to America while leaving all their children behind? That can't possibly account for more than one part per million of the budget.

      What about the drug dealers who pull in thousands of dollars a week yet are on welfare because they technically do not make anything?

      If the government knew they were drug dealers, they'd be in jail. Are you seriously proposing we not take care of anyone because of the chance they might be a criminal? That's just awful.

      What about people who take drugs and then get gov assistance?

      What about them? Should we just kill all the addicts? Or should we cast them out on to the streets so they have to choose between starvation and a life of crime?

      People gaming the system isn't a problem. It's noise around the edges.

      You want to see a balanced budget? Piece of cake:

      Cut the military in half. It'll still be bigger than the next three combined. $400B
      Restrict Social Security to the bottom 80%, since the top 20% don't need it: $130B
      Let the Bush tax cuts for the rich expire: $70B
      Adjust the FICA tax cap with inflation: $50B

      That's almost a trillion dollars right there. Not quite enough to close the deficit, but we're still recovering from a pretty deep recession. As unemployment claims drop and tax receipts rise, that'll cover the rest. And unlike your plan, my plan doesn't involve millions of starving drug addicts stabbing people to death in the streets.

      All of our budget problems come from overspending on the military, and unwise tax cuts in the Bush years.

    16. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Werd. Mod up.

      My answer to people who want minimal/negligible government is to go to Somalia. It's a hardcore fundy libertarian's wet dream.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    17. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is so simplistic it is amazing you don't see it.

    18. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't, unless you're some sort of gibbering retard who doesn't know what Libertarianism means.

    19. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe everyone should be provided healthcare by the state

      Doctors provide health care. What you're really saying is that you want "the state" to pay for it, where "the state" is actually just the collective "us". In short, you want everyone else to pay for your doctor bills.

    20. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      According to the description of said ideology as espoused by most of my friends and acquaintances who describe themselves as Libertarians, Somalia would be the end-product of the policies they advocate. Care to put your money where your mouth is and describe what you think Libertarianism means instead of anonymously casting ad hominem attacks like a pussy?

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    21. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a ridiculous FATASS problem. If people quit eating there own weight 3 times a fucking day wouldnt need medical coverage.

    22. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I believe everyone should be provided healthcare by the state, because I don't think we can trust private entities to resist the temptation to charge more and more for healthcare services (because they know we HAVE to pay it...)

      So, you want to start conscripting people to be doctors, nurses and other medical professionals? Otherwise, you are still trusting private entities to not "charge more and more for healthcare services," because if private individuals do not go into the medical professions, how exactly is the state going to provide healthcare?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    23. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Our life expectancy is 42 (50th for new borns) in the world falling behind Cuba and Chile, Our child mortality rate is one of the highest in the industrialized world.

      That is partly because most of those countries that rank ahead of the U.S. don't count infants that die in the first 24 hours as live births, while the U.S. does. Many countries throughout the world count infants that die in the first 24 hours as "stillbirths" rather than as live births. That means that children that die within 24 hours of birth do not count towards the life expectancy in those countries, while in the U.S. they do.
      Interestingly, one of the countries that has a higher life expectancy than the U.S. is Japan. Yet, Japanese-Americans have a higher life expectancy than those that live in Japan.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    24. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Defense is a legitimate function for government. It's in the fucking Constitution! Healthcare is not in the Constitution ergo it's not the government's job to do it.

      Right, because a few rich white aristocrats 250 years ago should have the last say as to what government should do. Even the founders knew they wouldn't be right about everything, nor could they include everything in a document as short as the Constitution (that's why we can amend it). Besides, "health-care costs" as we know them did not exist when the Constitution was written.

      That should end the argument but it never does with the havenots who want to steal shit from the haves.

      Nobody is stealing anything from anyone, unless it is the rich stealing the lives and pursuit of happiness of the poor by using their labor while they are healthy, then casting them aside when they become ill.

      BTW: You say you can't trust private entities to resist the temptation to charge more and more for healthcare services? What the fuck do you think will stop the government from doing the same? Both entities are made up of people and thus both can and do succumb to the temptation equally well.

      The Government is not a for-profit entity. The goal of a government run health service is not to make money, it is to keep people healthy. If you want examples of this working, look to the health-care systems of Northern and Western Europe, or indeed almost any other country that one wouldn't consider an emerging economy. Private health-care is a recipe for ever increasing costs, there can be no doubt about it...

      If you don't like the service they are providing (or not providing) you're just shit out of luck. You have no other entity that you can turn to, and if you do you likely face jail time if your truly resist Uncle Sam. And, you probably won't be able to vote the bastards out for years anyway. Think man! Think!!!

      You need to think, not me my friend. Nobody is saying that you MUST use government health-care. If you have the money and want to go to a private doctor/hospital, nothing prevents you from doing so under socialized medicine. Again, look at Western Europe, Germany for instance. There is fantastic socialized medicine which is basically free, but if you want to pay for things like a private room, better food, more expensive doctors, you can! You just go to a private hospital instead of a public one.

      I don't know where people get this idea that socialized medicine means private doctors will go away... it's just ridiculous. Do private automobiles disappear when public transportation is built? No? I'm done responding to you. You're obviously just regurgitating what right wing pundits have told you, and are unable to think any of your "ideas" through to their logical conclusions.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    25. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1

      So, you want to start conscripting people to be doctors, nurses and other medical professionals? Otherwise, you are still trusting private entities to not "charge more and more for healthcare services," because if private individuals do not go into the medical professions, how exactly is the state going to provide healthcare?

      What, the state can't build hospitals, pay doctors, and charge reasonable prices for services? The state can't set maximum prices for procedures? Why exactly do you think that private individuals would stop going into the medical professions if the government was setting, or even paying their salary? Maybe the people who become doctors to become rich would go to Wall-Street instead (and maybe not, since nothing about socialized medicine precludes the existence of private doctors), but either way, fuck those assholes. If you only become a doctor to get rich off of the sickness of others, fuck you.

      Socialized medicine can easily co-exist with private medicine (and it does in many countries). There is no reason that it can't; the poor and middle-class get healed in public hospitals, and the rich pay whatever they want to get healed in 5 star private hospitals. The only thing the existence of socialized medicine prevents is the ability of private practices to price-gouge their customers, since their customers always have a cheap alternative.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    26. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You are apparently unaware that the U.S. currently has a shortage of doctors willing to take Medicaid patients. There is reason to believe that as current doctors retire, not enough doctors are being trained to replace them. There is currently a shortage of nurses in most areas. Who do you think it is that is running those private practices that you think are "price-gouging" their customers? Most private practices are owned and run by doctors. How exactly are you going to find a cheap alternative to "price-gouging" private practices if all of the doctors go into private practice rather than work for those "cheap alternatives"? Are you going to make private practice illegal? Are you going to require them to accept what the government pays? In either of those cases, how are you going to keep them in business? If there were enough doctors willing to work for "cheap", why have they not competed the "price-gougers" out of business?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    27. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1

      That's why you have the government set a maximum price that can be charged for a procedure.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    28. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1
      It works in Germany anyways, so clearly you can have parallel systems. The public medical care is great here, but there are also private hospitals you can go to if you want to spend more money on more expensive insurance.

      Here's a thought, maybe doctors have other considerations than salary when considering where to practice?

      Also, the path to becoming an MD in the US is ridiculous, and is a big part in why doctors favor going into private practice in the USA. If MDs didn't leave school with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, maybe they could afford to work for a smaller salary.

      But then we would need to have the government pay for higher education... which would be terrible, right?

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    29. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      And where are you going to get the doctors who will work for that "maximum price"? Currently there are not enough doctors to drive the price down below what you consider "price-gouging", do you really think that setting maximum prices is going to somehow encourage people to become doctors (not to mention the additional paperwork that is going to be necessary)? What incentive do you intend to provide people to do the hard work necessary to become properly trained doctors?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    30. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well since you seem to think that part of the problem with the U.S. medical system is how we train our doctors, perhaps it would have been wise to start reforming medical care in the U.S. there, rather than on how they practice medicine?
      I always love when people promote something as a solution to a problem, then when a problem with their solution is pointed out, say, "well, the real answer is x." If the base problem with U.S. healthcare is how we train our doctors, why didn't they start reforming there?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    31. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1

      What incentive do you intend to provide people to do the hard work necessary to become properly trained doctors?

      That they get to become Doctors, to heal people, and they will still earn an excellent living?

      As for the doctors who got into medicine just for the money, fuck them. They're a major part of why the American healthcare system is so broken. They're the ones that give you unnecessary treatment and procedures because it makes them more money. They're the ones that prescribe drugs you don't need because they get kickbacks from big pharmaceutical sponsors.

      The USA would be better off without those "doctors".

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    32. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1
      Just to be clear, I'm an American, I moved to Germany a few years ago.

      I don't see why it's necessary to start reforms in only one place... Certainly the cost to become a doctor in the US needs to be reformed. The cost of being a patient also needs to be reformed. The insurance system needs to be reformed.

      To be honest, after having experienced first hand (in and out of hospitals) the medical system in the US military, the US private sector, France, and now Germany, I can tell you that the US private system is completely broken. It needs to be reformed on many levels.

      The American medical system is about making money first, and healing patients second. As an American, one tends to not realize this because that's all one knows.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    33. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      So, basically, you are saying that you are OK with there not being enough doctors to treat everyone. That some people are just going to have to do without because there are not enough people willing to go through the hard work of becoming a doctor just for the joy of being treated like a government slave.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    34. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but failing to reform the cost to become a doctor in the US, failing to do anything to reduce the cost of being a patient and "reforming" the insurance system so that all of it is more like the most broken part of the existing system does not seem like the way to go about it to me. Oh, and increasing the paperwork involved in providing treatment and forcing doctors to put everyone's medical records on the Internet don't seem like such great ideas either.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    35. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1
      I don't disagree with you. Let's not forget that Obamacare is actually the Republican's health plan, it was a compromise.

      I absolutely hate the Democrats for not enacting comprehensive reform while they had the chance. Now that the House is run by Republicans, there's absolutely no chance of meaningful reform ever happening. Certainly not reform that would give Americans better coverage.

      This is because FoxNews has pounded it into the right-wing base that anything involving socialism is the devil. Nevermind that socialized medicine would be great for the vast majority of the lower middle-class right wing base.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    36. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1
      I don't know why you say there won't be enough doctors.

      I tore my ACL in Germany, and was able to see a doctor within a couple days. I was then scheduled for surgery two weeks later (the delay was to let swelling go down, not because they didn't have enough doctors). I had surgery (spent three days in the hospital - it's an outpatient procedure in the US because insurance doesn't want to pay for hospital stays), and then had comprehensive rehab and follow up visits with the doctor.

      You know what it cost me? 10 Euros.

      TOTAL.

      I wasn't a special case... this is how everyone gets treated. If anything, I might have received sub-par (for Germany) treatment, because I don't speak German very well.

      Point is, there are enough doctors in countries with socialized medicine.

      Get it through your head - the USA does not have the best healthcare in the world (even though it pays its doctors the most).

      This myth that there aren't enough doctors with socialized medicine is exactly that, a myth.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    37. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I am not familiar with the German system. I do however know that there are doctor shortages in the UK and Canada. I, also, know that in many areas in the U.S. there are few if any doctors accepting new Medicaid/Medicare patients and that some areas are have a shortage of doctors for any type of payment plan. I, also, know that doctors have been leaving the medical profession in larger numbers than new doctors are entering the field in the U.S.. It may be that it is possible to have government run medical care that provides good care, but none of the programs I am familiar with do so.
      The U.S. may not have the best medical care in the world, but it is close. The 5 year prognosis for someone diagnosed with cancer is consistently among the best in the U.S.. A recent article I read on the subject of the 5 year prognosis for someone diagnosed with cancer in Germany expressed pride that for most cancers it was almost as good as that of the U.S..

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    38. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Obamacare is not the "Republican's health plan" and it is not a compromise. It was passed with no Republican votes in the House and only one Republican vote in the Senate (and even then they had to play games since the version the House passed did not match the version the Senate passed and they had to come up with a way to pass the bill that they could get the House Democrats to accept past the Senate after the Massachusetts elected Scott Brown to replace Ted Kennedy--Scott Brown basically ran on stopping passage of the bill, Ted Kennedy was a lifetime supporter).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    39. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a citation for that?

    40. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Obamacare is not the "Republican's health plan" and it is not a compromise.

      Actually, the individual mandate is exactly that. It was originally the idea of the Heritage foundation.

      The Pulitzer-winning Politifact.com, created by the Tampa Bay Times and its Washington bureau chief Bill Adair, did a fine job of sorting through all this -- even though its work has not always been sufficiently noted by news media colleagues.

      It asked 10 conservative ideologues not affiliated with Heritage if they thought Obama was accurate in asserting his health-care plan had Heritage roots.

      Nine thought Obama's statement was "reasonably accurate," Politifact.com reported.

      and

      American Conservative magazine senior editor Daniel McCarthy discussed just that with Politifact.com.

      "I don't imagine Ed Feulner would be complaining at all if a Republican president or a Republican Congress had passed a plan that deviated from the Heritage blueprint to the same degree that Obama's bill has," McCarthy told Politifact. "... the overall approach is similar to policies Heritage has long championed, including the individual mandate as well as the insurance exchanges.

      "This is only controversial because the wrong party happened to pass the law, and it's poison for any conservative to be identified with it."

      Look it up. In fact, the individual mandate was the solution long championed by conservatives, since it is the "market" solution. Democrats wanted (and should have passed) a single-payer system.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    41. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1
      Look at the numbers here.

      Just about every Western European country has more doctors per capita than the US. Yet they also have socialized medicine.

      Seems like the theory that socialized medicine results in few doctors isn't necessarily true.

      It may be that it is possible to have government run medical care that provides good care, but none of the programs I am familiar with do so.

      Canada provides good care. Germany provides good care. France provides good care. MANY countries provide good care. You can't just stick your head in the ground and deny that.

      The 5 year prognosis for someone diagnosed with cancer is consistently among the best in the U.S.

      It also is liable to bankrupt you, or at the very least destroy your financial situation. Also, while you may have a decent chance of surviving cancer in the US, good luck ever getting new coverage once you've had cancer. No insurance provider is going to give coverage to someone who had cancer unless they're forced to.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    42. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Democrats wanted (and should have passed) a single-payer system.

      If that is what they wanted, why didn't they pass it? They got essentially no Republican support for an idea that you claim is a Republican one (by the way, while the Heritage Foundation is often touted as a conservative think tank, it is not actually part of the Republican Party). Between the time the Heritage Foundation first proposed the individual mandate and when Obamacare passed, people who believe in the Constitution came to have greater influence in the Republican Party. Obamacare is controversial because the U.S. Constitution has no provision for the Federal Government to insert itself into healthcare. This may come as a shock to you, but there are a significant number of U.S. Citizens who would like to see the U.S. government return to being one that actually abides by the U.S. Constitution and when something is found that should be handled by the Federal Government that the Federal Government is not authorized to do, then Amends the U.S. Constitution rather than just redefine what the words in it mean.
      The Democrats passed Obamacare over the practically unanimous opposition of the Republicans in both Houses of Congress, so, no, they don't get to blame Republicans for it. The reason that the Republicans, for all intents and purposes, unanimously opposed it was because they discovered that the overwhelming sentiment of the voters was to oppose it. The Democrats voted for it because they could not pass up the opportunity to take greater control of people's lives while they controlled the entire Federal government.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    43. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see, my choice is to still be alive five years after being diagnosed with cancer but not have health insurance, or be dead. Yeah, that's a tough choice.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    44. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1

      so, no, they don't get to blame Republicans for it.

      Don't get me wrong, there are many things in Obamacare that are positive, and I'm not "blaming" anyone... I just wish the Democrats could have managed to pass a single payer system. They couldn't because the "center" in the USA is so far to the right; moderate democrats in the US would be considered right wing in Europe.

      they discovered that the overwhelming sentiment of the voters was to oppose it.

      This just isn't true. There is majority support for most, if not all of the provisions of the bill. This idea that "the overwhelming sentiment of the voters was to oppose it" comes from FoxNews and their blatant spreading of disinformation - such as the supposed "Death-Panels".

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    45. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by jpapon · · Score: 1
      I know you're being facetious, but for many it might be a tough choice. Bankrupt your family by living through expensive treatment, or die and give them a good chunk of money from life insurance...

      Besides, that doesn't have to be the choice. It could be "still be alive in five years AND have health insurance".

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    46. Re:Only the retarded use sexual slang by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      If there is support for most of the provisions of the bill, why did they then not pass those provisions by themselves? No, they put those provisions that they thought they could convince the majority of voters to support in with provisions that they knew the majority would always oppose in the hope that people would support it for the parts they liked. It didn't work out that way because they have been doing this sort of thing for long enough that people finally caught on. People want the whole thing tossed and then the different provisions voted on on their own merits, not as some sort of "take it or leave it" proposition. The voters response to that approach is, "Well, in that case, we will leave it."

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  37. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    In no way am I suggesting that everyone in Arizona is like that; I happen to know a couple people who live there and they're great. Unfortunately, your politicians have set policies that I don't find attractive in the least, and the fact that they have done so, repeatedly, suggests that the tone there would not be welcoming.

    If you want to change your image, change your politicians. The problem seems to be that many Arizona natives like them.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  38. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    So you have no problem with the laws of the US but a problem with the state of Arizona actually enforcing these laws? Fan-friggin-tastic.

    I simply can't imagine why somebody might prefer a state where being flagged down and asked to produce your papers is still an unlikely event, even if you look like you might be of the foreign persuasion...

    Shockingly enough, it is entirely possible to agree with a law and disagree with a given method of enforcing it. Except in rare cases, when the law actually explicitly prescribes its own enforcement methods, the two are actually very different things.

  39. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So you are using Mexico as a shining example of what the United States should become?

    People are running across the border for a reason, dude.

  40. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Antipater · · Score: 1

    Quoting the Heritage Foundation is akin to a Godwin.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  41. There are many Silcon valley clones by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Austin Texas is a hot one and so is Bismark, ND. Indianapolis is a major call center hub too for english speaking call centers.

    It does not make economical sense to move to such an outrageously expensive place like northern California where you need to make $90,000 a year for a studio apartment when you are a struggling .com with limited funds who can not afford even the insurance premiums let alone employee costs.

    In the old days it made sense to specialize in one area as your suppliers, inventory, and material were all nearbye which is why Michigan is home to the auto industry and nearbye Ohio made the parts and tires. Steel was one state away in Pennsylvania etc.

    But with IT you do not have that issue so why bother paying $120,000 a month for a tiny floor with just 3 offices and 1200 square feet when you can tripple that in Austin or Bismark and pay your employees half or hire twice as much with the saved capital?

    1. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by vlm · · Score: 2

      and pay your employees half

      The ratio is not nearly that big. Maybe 10% to 20% less. Blows the minds of my coastie and Chicago friends. Depends on what field you're in, I suppose.

      Note this fact doesn't help the argument much, but it does explain why I have absolutely no interest in moving. I'd only need a 200% pay raise to maintain the same standard of living.... oh thanks GOOG for that generous offer of 20% more, but I'm not even going to bother talking to your recruiter for that little... I'm not moving into a cardboard box under the overpass just to work for you, LOL.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah...about Austin. It's not as cheap as it used to be.

      There are still some bargains in the small towns and suburbs surrounding it, but if you want to live or set up an office in a nice place downtown - it's not the bargain it used to be. I've been here for 5 years now, and I'm thinking about moving on. It's insanely hot in the summer, it's crowded with refugees from California and other places with economic issues, and the guy who is credited with the phrase 'keep austin weird' died. Some changes here are good...most really haven't been.

    3. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      That is especially true if you have a family. That is why many up there like to hire fresh cs grads with no experience willing to share a room in a studio. ... what they do not see is they have no experience outside their b-tree algorithm assignments unlike the 35 year old with 8 years of experience. Obviously the 35 year old probably has 2 kids, a wife, and a mortgage to pay off and can't get that 4 bedroom the wife wants in Mountain View unless he makes as much as Mark Zuckerburg.

      Even that office space itself is not cheap and you burn money very fast and California is one the least business friendly places in the US with lots of regulation, taxes, and attorney fees (also taxed) to keep it running. Arizona and North Dakata you can work more than 40 hours no sales tax (important if you are an amazon.com), low corporate taxes etc. Remember the investors get a cut first before yourself so your own cut covers the taxes too.

      Sorry but there is no magic specialization that makes a coder better there and I do not see the point.

    4. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I heard that sadly as I loved Austin in the 1990s. Dallas is a nice place but it sure as hell beats North Dakata! Hot there too in the summer and freaking arctic winters as it is flight from there all the way to the north pole. It is warmer in Alaska than in Bismark or Fargo believe it or not!

      Still it can't be as expensive as Mountain View or San Jose?

    5. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh...it's still quite a bit less expensive than Mountain View or San Jose. I guess what I'm trying to say is that you'd be getting what you pay for. :) I don't think it's much of a bargain anymore.

      The traffic is crazy, the public transportation is very weak and not too good in general, and the scenery and climate....eh. I'm curious to see what the world thinks when F1 gets here in November. The drive from the airport is severely ugly since it's over on the east side. It's mostly run down buildings, pawn shops, and industrial parks over there...the drive to and from the airport in Austin is actually one of the ugliest I've ever seen.

      It's got it's good points, but I miss being on one of the coasts.

    6. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't bust their ass at Stanford and MIT so they can end up in North Dakota. Get real.

    7. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realestate is so freaking cheap in AZ. I mean, you can buy a decent house for 180k. With a developers salary you could pay that off in 10 years. Where i live my rent is about 60% more than the mortgage payment for a 180k house. That said, i don't think PHX is the next silicon valley. Wrong political climate, crappy talent pool (unless you're building missles), and it's hot.

      I would put more money on Denver/Boulder which has a nice mix of big corps and startups, plus a sizeable vc scene. It's also ridiculously easy to attract talent with the climate, mountains, microbrews, and fitness oriented lifestyle of the area.

    8. Re:There are many Silcon valley clones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh thanks GOOG for that generous offer of 20% more, but I'm not even going to bother talking to your recruiter for that little... I'm not moving into a cardboard box under the overpass just to work for you, LOL.

      Nice try, but Google actually expects you to live at the office for that 20% pay raise.

      Cardboard box? Don't be silly. You get a very nice cube Well, perhaps not a cube so much as a "working area".

  42. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    I love how everyone with these extreme viewpoints posts as an AC. In any case, like I said, there's a reason ICE exists. Apparently, you people don't think their laws go far enough. I disagree, vehemently.

    Additionally, your point about the Mexican police force really has nothing to do with anything since they would appear to be a federal entity, like ICE. If you were to talk about the police of a specific Mexican province or city, maybe then you'd have a point, limited as it may be (I'm not sure I would want to base my national immigration policy on Mexico, after all).

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  43. Or, try Colorado by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The weather is much more pleasant in Colorado.

    The only thing is the cost of living is not quite as low as Arizona. But it sure beats California...

    There's a ton of technical stuff going on all across the state, and only Colorado has places to suit ideology anywhere on the spectrum (far left, Boulder. far right, Colorado Springs. Independent? Anywhere).

    Also they have laws to prevent idiots from hanging in the left lane forever preventing you from passing trucks. So unlike California, highways actually work here.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Or, try Colorado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really...im stuck on 225 right now.

    2. Re:Or, try Colorado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also they have laws to prevent idiots from hanging in the left lane forever preventing you from passing trucks.

      I've never seen this law enforced, so it's just as bad as anywhere else I've been (granted, I've never been to California). The thing that gets on my nerves here is during rush hour, people seem to think that at least five car lengths of distance are required to be safe at 20 miles an hour. Getting stopped at lights unnecessarily easily adds an hour a month to my total commute time. Think of how much more Diablo 3 I could play and Doritos I could eat if I had that time back.

      Speaking of traffic, I don't think Denver's roads could handle another influx of people. I've come to accept the fact that I can't drive anywhere between 4:30 and 6 through the week.

    3. Re:Or, try Colorado by seepho · · Score: 1

      Why aren't you at work? It's only 4:20 in Den...

      Nevermind.

    4. Re:Or, try Colorado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, please don't. We're full.

  44. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not uncommon. Consider that Illinois is a "gimme" blue state... http://www.flickr.com/photos/28549588@N05/6589935329/

  45. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Austin is in Texas. If they're lucky they'll be Arizona's Austin. In Utah it's Park City and Moab, right? I forget. These big western states full of right-wing gun totin' whackos. It's too far to LA/SF/NY so they usually have an island of hip culture somewhere.

  46. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks for confirming my suspicion.

    Despite Joe's antics, he'll get elected again because his politics aren't what most of the voting populous of AZ cares about.

    Things like Tent City suck, and we like when our criminals get sent there.  We like that he deputizes people to track down deadbeat dads or keep gangbangers out of mall parking lots.  We like that he's a mean son of a bitch.  We want our stupid kids locked up and put in a chain-gang for the week when they get a drunk driving charge.

    We overlook the fact that he panders to the media on the right with birther nonsense, because he's not a position in our government where it matters.  [Hint, the MCSO doesn't determine presidential eligibility.]

  47. Re:Arizona has more severe budget problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Arizona is bankrupt."

    So? Pretty much all 57 (or is it 59?) states are bankrupt - or at least on the way. California has it the worst. NY, IL, anywhere we find... wait for it.... the federal government and Democrats.

  48. $2 million in capital raised by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    $2 million in capital raised. So what are they opening, a Burger King?

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  49. Is Phoenix the next Silicon Valley? by RockGrumbler · · Score: 1

    Nope. It's actually Silicon Valley 2, NV. Sorry Phoenix.

  50. I don't know why anyone would go to Phoenix by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    if they didn't absolutely have to. I lived there for 4 years of dental school. It's too hot to move about 8 months of the year, all the plants have thorns, all the insects sting, all the reptiles are poisonous. There's no water. This is a message from the universe telling you that human beings don't belong there.

    Of all the places to be in Az, I never understood why people would have settled in that god-forsaken valley. 100 miles away there are decent climates at higher altitudes.

    Further proof of the stupidity of humans...

  51. Rich Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those retired rich and not so rich old people. Hit'em jup for money.

    "Hey grandma! Wanna invest in something that'll make your grandkids rich!"

  52. mixed news by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Moving away from Silicon Valley -- Great!

    Moving to Phoenix -- No damned way.

    Can't we pick some place with a lower cost of living than the SF bay area (which shouldn't be hard) *and* isn't hot enough to barbecue small animals?

    I moved *from* Phoenix. I visited there recently. It's still too damned hot.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:mixed news by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Can't we pick some place with a lower cost of living than the SF bay area (which shouldn't be hard) *and* isn't hot enough to barbecue small animals?

      Seattle. Trouble is, once Silicon Valley moves someplace, then with everybody trying to live there, the prices will jump right up to Silicon Valley levels because the same people will be buying the same amount of space while working the same jobs. If you want to get away from the cost of living issues, you have to simply move to where less people want to live.

    2. Re:mixed news by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Not if the place is not sunny and by the beach. It's the locale, I think, as much as the business environment that keeps prices high. In theory, Phoenix would be better from a cost standpoint because enough people would not want to move there that it would keep the costs down. But it's still too damned hot.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  53. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two wrongs don't make a right.

  54. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QQ fgt.

  55. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all these viewpoints are not extreme, they are views that liberals typically disagree with (arguably as directed by the likes of John Stewart and others in the horribly biased media, but that's another post) and you call them extreme.

    Well I call your views extreme, how do you like that?

    Finally I post as an AC because when I post using my login you liberals mod me down and attack, reducing my posting provliges to 10 per day. So much for all that openness, transparency and freedom of speech thing huh?

    So fine, I will keep posting AC.

    How do you like that?

  56. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    So you elect him because the issues on which he's speaking don't matter to you, but expect immigrants (i.e. people to whom issues like that matter immensely) to... what? Ignore it? Kind of difficult when you're being asked for your papers all the time...

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  57. Re:No by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    No, they mostly come from Mesa. I do not consider Mesa to be Phoenix yet.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  58. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    <3

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  59. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by travisb828 · · Score: 1

    It also takes some balls to leave your home country.

  60. The answer is a resounding NO by drgroove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've lived in Scottsdale for the past 2 years, having previously lived in Chicago and Silicon Valley. The vast majority of developers here are C# developers who would rate between a B- and a D if graded on their development skills. The vast majority of development jobs in Phoenix are also centered around C#; seeing as most web-based startups are using Java or LAMP as their underpinning technology, Phoenix's labor pool and developer job opportunities simply aren't aligned to maintain a robust startup environment. Additionally, development jobs pay anywhere from 30-50% less than other major coder cities. Lower cost of living be damned; if companies are looking to hire C# developers for $70k/year, they're not going to attract top talent. Chicago, San Jose, Austin ... you could spend an afternoon listing all of the cities that are healthier for startups and talented developers. And, all of these issues are just the tip of the spear - we haven't even addressed the political climate in Arizona. Good luck convincing talented developers here on an H1B that Arizona is a safe place to live and work.

    1. Re:The answer is a resounding NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there: C# developers rate between B- an D.

    2. Re:The answer is a resounding NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have noticed a lot of tech moving out to Las Vegas. Lots of infrastructure, cheap, easy access to airport, tons of exhibition space and not even close to being over crowded. Plus CA in general (especially the bay area) is just turning into a cash and tax leech for any business.

  61. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and largely driven by old white men angrily brandishing guns"

    So many of you people are just horribly misinformed, it's just not worth engaging in dialog, you sir are a lost cause.

    Here's a clue, wherever you got your education, you should demand your money back.

  62. Has anyone ever been there? by overshoot · · Score: 2

    Well, it's the fifth-largest city in the USA. Apparently, someone has not only been there but is still there.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Omaha, Nebraska is a pretty decent-sized city too, but it isn't exactly known for technology or culture.

    2. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only the 5th-largest (now 6th-largest) city if you limit your list to just stand-alone cities (and not "metropolitan areas.") Phoenix is actually only #14 on the list of metropolitan areas, behind Detroit.

    3. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Omaha is the 43rd largest city in the country with a population less than a third that of Phoenix, and yeah, it's not known for technology or culture. I'm not sure what that has to do with Phoenix though, or the post that GP was replying to for that matter (the one about "has anyone been to Phoenix"). In terms of metro areas, the Omaha area has about 870,000 people, the Phoenix area has over 4.2 million.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    4. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The point is, just because a bunch of people live there, that doesn't mean that it's a particularly nice place, let alone an ideal location for "the next Silicon Valley".

    5. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's the fifth-largest city in the USA. Apparently, someone has not only been there but is still there.

      Not anymore. The illegals left in droves after the brown skin law was passed.

    6. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by reidconti · · Score: 1

      Omaha's quite nice, actually! Beautiful downtown. I could be really happy there. Unlike Phoenix. But I'll stay in Silicon Valley until I have a reason to move.

    7. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That's true, it's a good thing that the Forbes article doesn't say "just because a lot of people live there."

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    8. Re:Has anyone ever been there? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, it just spouts a lot of lies, such as the ridiculous notion that you can rent a 3BR place for $850/month. The only place you might find a place for that price is in the ghetto on the west side.

  63. No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTP is the next Silicon Valley. Everybody knows that.

  64. Born and braised by overshoot · · Score: 2

    And as one native to another, can you really see this happening? I mean, seriously: attempting to replace Standford with ASU? Getting people to choose Maricopa over the Bay Area? GMAFB.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Born and braised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I live here too; it sucks, and I can't wait to leave. The whole idea of this being the next Silicon Valley is insane. The weather alone should quash any notions of that, but if that's not enough how about the shitty "culture" here? Half the inhabitants are illegals, the other half are on meth.

    2. Re:Born and braised by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I'm sure lots of non-American and non-Caucasoid American scientists want to move into an area controlled by Joe "Papers Please" Arpaio.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Born and braised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. As a non-white, non-American, why would I want to trust my life and business to a state that thinks Joe Arpaio is a good idea? You get what you pay for.

    4. Re:Born and braised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about the cops who hate everyone.

      Also, isn't Phoenix where LA's gangs migrated too?

      Phoenix is mostly dirty, illiterate, and full of bigots, illegals, and junkies. I live in Tucson and have been passing up job offers there for years. Only posting as AC because one of these days I *might* end up having to take a job there, but it'll be a last resort, right behind Siberia.

    5. Re:Born and braised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google left the valley of the sun because of a lack of java developers, lots of .net developers 'tho it's hard to find any looking for a job. I've been posting for a month and just getting project managers and the occasional jack of all trades

      maybe the startups are gobbling them all up

    6. Re:Born and braised by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's a tech glut in the area, which makes it just that much harder for a deaf guy to find work in the field.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  65. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by jpapon · · Score: 1

    That's the best you can do? "Mexican cops can be assholes too"?

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
  66. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by pspahn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have essentially answered your own question.

    On one hand, you say that you disagree with Arizona laws because of the beliefs of the people that live there. This is a problem because it makes Arizona out of step with the majority of the US.

    But.. the majority of the US is not in Arizona. That's why it's called Arizona. It's a different place from where you live. If you don't live there, why do you care?

    Do you have a problem with marijuana dispensaries every three blocks in Denver (assuming you don't live in Colorado)?

    How about *insert some other random law approved by the state which gets challenged federally*?

    Let the states conduct their own business.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  67. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by slippyblade · · Score: 2

    You wish. We've got a vigilante group here in Arizona, call themselves "Minutemen" than routinely walk the border. These idiots are are NOT cops. They are civilians with guns that shoot first. That's just a sample of AZ. I hate this place but can't afford to leave.

  68. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Airzona is doing what other countries do. ENFORCING immigration polices. If you have an h1b1 visa or are a greencard worker you are welcome.

    Now if I want to your country (probably Australia, UK, or India) and came illegally you bet my ass I would be arrested and the employer fined and deported. Why is that you can come take jobs away but I can't take yours away. Employers can use the whole globe for the best talent and yet I can't do the same with the best employer.

    It is hot button issue but in a recession with millions out of work many in Arizona can't find work anymore and yet Mexicans from across the border come in and the employers get a BIG tax write off to boot! How is that fair?

  69. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by swb · · Score: 1

    In my experience (and I know the plural of experience is not data) with Arizona, some of the most strident negative opinions about immigrants were from people who were of obvious Hispanic heritage.

    Even the people you'd normally characterize as "conservative" (white, carry a handgun, etc) always struck me as more socially and interpersonally "liberal" -- ie, they weren't bible thumpers, most were OK with legalizing marijuana to stem the drug cartels and gangs, not hung up on the usual hard-ass conservative things.

    In fact in some of the rural areas, it was kind of hard to tell the "conservative desert rats" from the "desert hippies". They both kind of look alike, dress alike, etc. About the biggest difference was the conservative guys usually had guns and the liberals usually not.

    Overall I considered most of the "conservatives" to be more libertarian than the kind of white and uptight, Jesus H. Christ christian conservatives, like Michelle Bachmann or that type.

  70. But that's just me. by overshoot · · Score: 1

    Well, you and this old white guy Arizona native.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  71. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I am right, you are welcome.

  72. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    A common misrepresentation. Sherrif Joe has his faults, but instructing his officers to stop vehucles on the highway with expired plates, faulty safety equipment, and a dozen people in the back on suspicion that they are possibly transporting illegal aliens is reasonable and prudent. And yes, they are probably dark-skinned.

    If they show a drivers license, regtistration, insurance card, and their passengers mostly answer questions and don't try to hide, they usually go on ther way with a warning. Refusing to talk to the officer will get them a quick vacation in Tent City.

    Don't believe all the propoganda.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  73. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

    Things like Tent City suck, and we like when our criminals get sent there. We like that he deputizes people to track down deadbeat dads or keep gangbangers out of mall parking lots. We like that he's a mean son of a bitch. We want our stupid kids locked up and put in a chain-gang for the week when they get a drunk driving charge.

    That someone would present these as the appealing, non-right-wing facets of Joe Arpaio says a lot.

    As long as they don't fail ongoing legal/constitutional scrutiny, it is the right of Joe's constituents to support these kinds of policies. Nevertheless, they are indeed why many people would not want to move to AZ.

  74. Mostly dry? by overshoot · · Score: 1

    I don't call a dew point of 70F "mostly dry." If you can't use an evaporative cooler, it's not humid, it's freaking soggy.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Mostly dry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Every apartment complex and office building in phoenix I lived/worked in used evaporative coolers. It's like a thing there. They're EVERYWHERE! You have no idea what you're talking about.

    2. Re:Mostly dry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't call a dew point of 70F "mostly dry." If you can't use an evaporative cooler, it's not humid, it's freaking soggy.

      Dew points of greater than 54F are three months or so out of a calendar year (the "monsoon season")

      Thus, the newbies to the desert tend to whine, butch, and complain about the temps.

      Don't like it? Two hours away - the White Mountains - four degrees of temperature drop for every thousand feet!

  75. As a Phoenix Native Currently Living in SJ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no. That is all. Really. Bad idea. Don't bother.

  76. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    ICE is under executive branch and the president gets campaign contributions from lobbiests to make sure they do not hire Americans. Mostly farming corporations who take over farms and then hire illegals to run them.

    If ICE cracked down the hispanic vote would be up in arms rioting and the corporations would no longer have cheap labor.

    FYI I am not racist at all but just stating the obvious as someone who used to live in Southern California and seen what happened to the state. In the old days Americans use to do construction believe it or not and got paid a middle class salary. Today you can't find any work in that field even for minimium wage. The rest of the US is not that bad but even in places like Minnosota wages 15 years ago for working in the meat processing plant averaged $30,000 a year. Today they only hire Mexicans and pay $17,000 a year for the same job while the former workers were mysteriously laid off.

    ICE is not doing its job. I have no problems with h1b1 workers such as yourself as you pay taxes and provide a service no one else can do, but the economic cost is bankrupting states and hurting people trying to not starve.

  77. Re:Arizona? Yes, Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My experience shows completely the opposite. I used to be in our PHX office from start of 2010 till mid 2011. Then I moved to our Silicon Valley office (right behind Oracle) because I changed the project I was working on, but I really think I had much more freedom in PHX (financial, time, personal life). And yes, I am not even an immigrant, but a transferee (from Eastern Europe). People in Phoenix/Scottsdale are way nicer than the people in Silicon Valley. I've been all around AZ - in towns, Indian reservations; near the MX border - never had any issue, except with an Indian cop in the Indian reservation for engine breaking (Sir, I didn't see your break lights when you made that left turn. Drunk people usually do that, so would you mind being tested with a breathalyzer.)

  78. Silicon Valley has Inertia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live and work in one of the Hub Areas external to Silicon Valley, London. There's a lot of startups here and a lot of investment; but it still doesn't have the critical mass of investors and startups to operate like the Valley. Phoenix doesn't have a thriving scene with hundreds of startups and billions of Investment so clearly the answer is no.

    The London startup scene is dependent on Investors based in San Francisco.

  79. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I am an European transferee and I like Joe Arpaio. I would vote for him if I could.

  80. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have an h1b1 visa or are a greencard worker you are welcome.

    "Welcome"? You are allowed to stay, subject to arbitrary scrutiny by law enforcement, and with the knowledge that law enforcement has been granted this power because everybody else you deal with thinks that you are a criminal until proven innocent.

  81. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you eyes but do not see?

    We in this country are allowed to defend ourselves and that includes securing the borders.

    If you don't believe that then please post your home address, I am coming over to sit on your couch, watch your TV and eat your food.

    If you fail to do so then you are free to admit I am right.

    The truth is you are free - and responsible for - defending your home from intrusion with firearms.

  82. double lol by poetmatt · · Score: 2

    Why would anyone want to be in the same state as Arpaio, let alone 30 miles away? Don't they know how that works? That area is full of crazies.

    1. Re:double lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arpaio isn't that bad just a self-aggrandizing blowhard. And, take it from someone who's been there, tent city isn't really that bad either. How many other jails can you roam around outside at will? Any other place and you'd be sitting in a little cell. Tent city actually pretty much rules as far as county detention centers go.

  83. I'm a software developer in Phoenix, by Jim+Haskell · · Score: 1

    and I love it here. I have no problems finding jobs. Lately at work we've actually had a lot of problems locating qualified software developers. TFA does read quite a bit like a real-estate ad but there's some truth to it, at least in my sector.

  84. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by mjr167 · · Score: 1

    It actually took me a bit to realize that I don't care about what other localities decide to do or not do. If San Fransisco wants to make pet ownership illegal and composting mandatory, that is their choice. If the subdevelopment down the street decides all houses must be pink with blue roofs, that is their choice. If NYC wants to harass new mothers, fine. If Arizona wants to pass 'crazy' laws, fine. I don't have to live in any of those places. What makes this country great is we can pass insane local laws that say you can't eat chicken on Tuesday and it's ok. The anti-chicken-eating-on-Tuesday people can all live together and leave me alone.

    It takes a lot actually to realize it doesn't matter what the crazies in the county over do cause they all think you are just as crazy. Eventually he will get it or tear his hair out in despair. Now get off my lawn!

  85. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do we care? because of the electoral college, the senate, the house where the people that live there send their representatives to legislate for the entire country. Outside of 2000 era John McCain that is scary to a lot us that aren't hard line right wing teabaggers.

  86. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bla bla bla bla Heritage Foundation bla bla bla.

    A sphincter says what?

  87. Mature industry by gagol · · Score: 1

    Silicon Valley is where the tech industry was born. I believe the Silicon Valley thing is over and development will spread around from now on. If anything, the next Silicon Valley is probably somewhere in China or India...

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  88. Absolutely not by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Silicon Valley is an a pretty beautiful part of the country. The ocean one direction and mountains in the other. The weather is beautiful year round.

    Phoenix is in a desert and the weather is shit. You have to be in air conditioning constantly, and it's getting worse. No water. You live a few years in Phoenix and you end up looking like Arizona governor Jan Brewer, with a face like a an old first basemen's mitt. You can practically live in Silicon Valley without heat or air conditioning. I spend time every year at a friend's house not far from Silicon Valley, near a town named "Corrallitos". You don't even need to put screens on the windows. Him and his wife sometimes go all year without turning on heat or air conditioning. There are trees growing all around with lemons, peaches. The best produce in the world is grown down the road. You can eat fresh figs year round.

    But the worst thing that Phoenix has going for it is that it's in Arizona. They have a county sheriff down there who makes the worst corrupt Chicago Boss look like the picture of responsible government. Arizona? Nobody needs that kind of grief. Companies in Arizona have to tell their employees of South Asian descent to carry proof of citizenship when they go jogging.

    I can see Phoenix becoming like a low-rent Silicon Valley, with companies who don't want to spend any money, but the first-rate talent just isn't going to want to go there.

    On the pro side, it's one of the best spots in the country if you want to have solar energy, which might, some day, off-set a fraction of the air conditioning expenses. On the con side, you have to be inside all the time.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Absolutely not by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      You realize Jan Brewer is almost 70 years old?

  89. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Things like Tent City suck, and we like when our criminals get sent there.

    What about the innocent, but accused? You did know that the majority of Tent Citie's population are merely accused and awaiting trial, right?

    But I'm wasting my time. You're exactly the kind of authoritarian asshole that keeps any sort of sensible person out of Phoenix. I hope you get falsely accused of a crime in August.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  90. Actually, I hope not by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I woudl love to participate in a huge expanson of the IT market here in Phoenix, but:

    - Most of the high-end, lucrative openings are for those with Java/javascript/J2EE, Ruby, CSS, HTML5, iOS, Android, .NET, Oracle, JQuery, and a combination of two CMS frameworks, a Masters in an applicable field, and experience. Oh, and system administration experience as well.

    In other words, an H1B.

    Pus.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  91. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Vancorps · · Score: 1

    Out of curioisity, do you understand what the actual purpose of the federal government is? It sure looks like you don't or you woudn't be advocating that states overrule the federal government.

    So many people have this backwards that it truly scares me. It is the job of the federal government to secure borders, not the job of local municipalaties which could start armed conflicts with another country. It is not up to individual states to determine foreign policy, otherwise Texas could declare war on China and the whole U.S. would have to deal with the consequences.

    I get that states should have the right to govern with minimal interference but when it comes to immigration it's no longer a single state making a decision. There is no federal law stating that you can't have marijuana dispensaries so it's up to Colorado or California to determine if that is what they want. Hell, here in Arizona we are starting to get dispensaries of our own!

    Long story short, Arizona is out of step with the majority, because the majority knows that a state's rights end where another states begins. Arizona militarizing the border makes for a problems that Texas, New Mexico, and California may not be prepared to handle, this makes it a federal issue.

  92. Just Because Univ of Phoenix is Based Online... by erdos-bacon+sandwich · · Score: 2

    Doesn't make Phoenix a hub of web start ups

  93. No, because Phoenix cannot attract talent. by Ichijo · · Score: 3, Informative

    In general, Phoenix is a boring place, and boring doesn't attract talent. For some reason, Phoenicians chose to build themselves a flat, heat-magnifying city of asphalt and concrete in an already hot location, instead of shade trees and tall buildings to help block the sunlight. Consequently, there are few vibrant, walkable areas (downtown Tempe is/was a notable exception), and there's not much to do in the summer except watch TV or go to the theater, the mall, or a water park.

    No, Phoenix isn't a good tech incubator. Phoenix is where you move your company after you've completed the real innovation and you just need cheap labor to keep the business running.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  94. No. Just no. by sdguero · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't move to Phoenix for a 50% raise. 100% and I'd consider it...

  95. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    We've kept him in office since 1993 because we like his position on crime and law enforcement.

    We mostly ignore things like his recent birther rhetoric because, as mentioned, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office doesn't determine presidential eligibility.

  96. Re:Arizona has more severe budget problems by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

    There are only 50 states, and Arkansas is not bankrupt. I know we live in the backwards south, but guess what the people here know how to vote for fiscally responsible citizens. I'm sure a few other states are okay too.

    But yes most are bankrupt.

  97. Re:No by zieroh · · Score: 1

    Mostly, I just wanted to hit the same nerve a second time. Looks like I succeeded.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  98. Re:No by zieroh · · Score: 1

    So clever!

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  99. Best place for this type of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheaper to live here, no natural disasters. Really we are going to argue heat when talking about a place to put a business. Silly, I could argue why place a business in an area that it snows in. Honestly as a business owner the fact it is cheaper means I pay less, no natural disasters mean my DR plans only have to be off my sight, not in another state, over-all it's a great business decision to move here.

  100. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    I understand that you prefer hugging drunk drivers, the voters of the great state of Arizona prefer to lock them up.

    Over 20 years ago I made some mistakes in my life, and one of those ended me up in tent city (when it was still new).  Part of what's kept me straight in the 20 years since has been the overwhelming desire not to ever, ever, go back.

  101. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by zieroh · · Score: 1

    But.. the majority of the US is not in Arizona. That's why it's called Arizona. It's a different place from where you live. If you don't live there, why do you care?

    Because I think that legislated discrimination anywhere in the United States is morally, ethically, and constitutionally wrong. As an American, I hold my fellow Americans to the ideal that all men are created equally.

    Frankly, the fact that I have to explain to you why I care is appalling, and demonstrates exactly how out of step Arizona is.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  102. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by slippyblade · · Score: 1

    Huh? How is defending your home even remotely the same as walking through the desert on federal land and shooting at random people that *might* be border jumpers? Huge difference.

    It is actually illegal to do what they are doing but they get away with it due to the nature of the area.

  103. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    These idiots are are NOT cops. They are civilians with guns that shoot first. That's just a sample of AZ.

    Just out of curiosity, how many of them have you ran into? I've lived in Phoenix for 33+ years and I can't say I've ever actually seen a Minuteman. Maybe not the best "sample" to use for the population in the 6th largest city in the country.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  104. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe could die tomorrow and still get reelected, I know I would certainly write his name in. People who actually live here know that it is because of Joe that we enjoy the relative safety and security that we do have.

  105. taking jobs away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is that you can come take jobs away but I can't take yours away. Employers can use the whole globe for the best talent and yet I can't do the same with the best employer.

    It is hot button issue but in a recession with millions out of work many in Arizona can't find work anymore and yet Mexicans from across the border come in and the employers get a BIG tax write off to boot! How is that fair?

    No one is "taking" the jobs from you. There are other people, who live in the same state as you, who are willingly employing these people for less money. Those are taking your job away from you. Those are the ones you should go after. But you don't, because the whole "taking jobs away" thing is a thin veil over strong xenophobia that's easier for people to rally against.

    1. Re:taking jobs away by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I am not racist and the jobs being taken away are not ones I do normally. However, I can't go to India to look for work or some place cheaper. The employers can and do because every country but the US enforces its immigration laws and is not being pocketed by corporations who hire illegally.

      Schools are flooded where 70% of the kids are not US born, have limited english, get free health care, and their parents do not pay for taxes. My ex kept getting laid off each year because of budget underruns caused by this. Her friends included former middle class workers who can't get hired as they do not speak spanish and are willing to work for less than minimium in construction. They are being shafted.

      Sorry but if I spoke iwth my great American accent in London the police there have a right too to ask if I am there legally right?

    2. Re:taking jobs away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, it seems the most effective way to deal with this situation is impose heavy fines on people found employing illegal workers. Not putting people in prison for wanting to have a better life peacefully. Instead of hunting around people, institute awards for reporting illegal workers and raid places they are wont to be working.

      Dry up the well and people will stop coming. If ICE won't do it, well that's not stopping the state from doing it, instead of harrassing and intimidating people on the streets.

      Overall, it seems your problem is that while everyone speaks against illegal workers, many of your own people do employ them because they're cheaper. If everyone in AZ stood to their principles and didn't hire them, they wouldn't be there.

    3. Re:taking jobs away by Kergan · · Score: 1

      I am not racist (...). Every country but the US enforces its immigration laws (...). Schools are flooded where 70% of the kids are not US born, have limited english, get free health care, and their parents do not pay for taxes. (...) Sorry but if I spoke iwth my great American accent in London the police there have a right too to ask if I am there legally right?

      Are you kidding me? Your blatant display of racism blinds you. US immigration laws are far more stringent and complex than in any other country I can name. It's such a nightmare to go there legally that it's much easier to swim across the Rio Grande, or to go in and out every three months sprinkled with month long breaks.

      Also, to douse your utter ignorance, if you spoke with your great American accent in London, the police would assume you're a tourist. They'd never bother controlling your ID as a result, because they need to issue a receipt for controlling anyone -- complete with a justification for doing so. This is to avoid abuses and bullying of legal immigrants by the police. As a US citizen you could likely live there illegally for as long as you never get in trouble.

  106. As a CA native living in Phoenix... by siphonophore · · Score: 1

    There's a lot to this.

    1. I bought a house right out of school, which improved my quality of life to higher than my SW Engineer brother in SJ.
    2. There is money here to be invested, and fewer groups are pursuing it, making the odds better for a sharp group with a good idea (big fish, small pond analogy)
    3. Public support: Incubators at ASU are actively looking for people with ideas to connect with funders. There is a palpable inferiority complex in the state that can be played to the advantage of the startup.
    4. Industry groups: AZBio, AZ Tech Council, etc are active and well attended
    5. Local talent: not as bad as is being described here. Remember the aero/semiconductor history of the area.
    6. Weather: remember, people, that CA has the best weather on the planet. When compared to half the country (e.g. places too snowy, too humid), Phoenix weather looks pretty good.
    7. Political climate: the negatives mentioned here are not a significant factor to developing a business. Significant factors include a much lower tax rate (without the spectre of giant tax increases once it all catches up to you, CA) and less state limitations on business.

    --
    Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
    -Scott Adams
  107. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by zieroh · · Score: 1

    So you're denying that Arizona has a higher percentage of old white men angrily brandishing guns than the rest of the country?

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  108. Re:Arizona has more severe budget problems by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    the federal government and Democrats

    Democracts and Republicans . They both spend money like drunken sailors. The only difference is democrats try to fund their spending a little with taxes, whereas the GOP waits for the funding to magically trickel down.

  109. Is Betteridge's Law of Headlines useful or true? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 0

    No

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  110. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "reason" and "logic" ? I don't think those words mean what you think they mean. But don't let that stop you polishing each other's balls in righteousness.

  111. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We pass these laws in Arizona so that the illegal population will forced into California. You want them, you pay for them.

  112. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they show a drivers license, regtistration, insurance card, and their passengers mostly answer questions and don't try to hide, they usually go on ther way with a warning. Refusing to talk to the officer will get them a quick vacation in Tent City.

    Don't believe all the propoganda.

    Refusing to talk to the officer ? this is a right enshrined in the Constitution.

    Answer questions and don't try to hide ? Are you hearing yourself ? You're a lot farther on the police state slope than I thought.

  113. (I) have no idea what you're talking about. by overshoot · · Score: 1

    If you say so. However, I've lived in Maricopa County for 60 years, grew up with swamp coolers, and have one now in addition to the AC.

    And the fool things, for all their virtues, don't work when the dew point is 70F like it was recently. For that matter, they're pretty wretched when the dew point is 55F, which it generally is from the beginning of June until well into September.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  114. I make the same pay rate as out counterparts in SF by codepunk · · Score: 1

    I make the same pay rate as my peers in SF yet my apartment rent is $550 per month in one of the best areas of the city. On top of that I don't even own a jacket, sunshine every single day.

    --


    Got Code?
  115. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    I do not hide under an AC.

    Living close the border I have seen the evils of illagal immigration when I lived in Riverside California. My exwife is from there and it is turning 3rd world. Not because I am a racist evil person who is a member of the KKK, but rather my ex worked in a school district that went 70% American to 70% hispanic in 15 short years, doubled the student population, cut fundinging by 1/3, cut all our family friends salaries, except increased one business owners' salary tremendousnly from the cheaper labor.

    You can't drive past a Home Depot with 30 hispanics ready to jump in a truck for work. My ex's friend did construction and made good monay back in the 1990s and he can't compete with these people. As a result people are getting poorer and poorer each year while taxes keep going up driving employers away.

    If ICE did its job and went into these home depots and busted them up, stopped trucks with 10 people on them, deported all the parents of these children you can be economic recovery would take place.

    H1b1 and greencards are welcome and an important step but Arizona is the only state that had the balls to do it without fear of the hispanic vote. All the other states lost control.

  116. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2, Informative

    Life time Arizona resident here.

    Actually the high tech industry is thriving here. It's as easy to get immigrants to work here as anywhere else. I should know, I work for a fortune 100 tech company who is based out of Phoenix, and we have a fair share of immigrant employees. Arizona only discriminates against illegal immigration. And it's not just white people that do it, even the legal immigrants have a problem with illegal immigration.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  117. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by your very poor grammar I would say the reason you can't find work is because you do not speak engrisch! I bet these hispanics you rail against can write and speak better and are far more intelligent than you are and thus more employable.

    Good god!

  118. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    Not really. I live in Arizona, and know many legal immigrants, and all of the ones I have heard opine on the subject are in favor of SB1070. And I myself work for a major tech company in Arizona that has many immigrant employees.

    Why do you think intel didn't have a problem building the worlds most advanced semiconductor fabrication plant here about a year after SB1070 was passed?

    It's illegal immigrants, who aren't supposed to be here to begin with, who have a problem.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  119. If Phoenix is the next silicon valley by The+Shootist · · Score: 1

    They need to move to Flagstaff. The weather is Phoenix is extremely unpleasant.

  120. Before investing, consider water access. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is no joke, water is going to become a very serious issue in places like
    Phoenix in the next couple of decades.

    1. Re:Before investing, consider water access. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poppycock.

      The city sits on an untapped aquifer that could provide current rates of water consumption for a decade.

  121. Dew Point and Relative Humidity by overshoot · · Score: 1

    90 degrees with 70-80% humidity is way worse than 100 degrees and 10-20% humidity, champ.

    90F and 80% RH is a dew point of 84F. Not many places in North America where that happens, or we'd be seeing a lot more fog in the evenings when the temperature dropped below that 90F peak.

    Meanwhile, 110F and a dew point of 72F (like we had here last week) is 30% humidity. Sounds dry, but only because 110F air can hold a LOT of water. At 90F that same dew point is 55% and nothing much evaporates. Including, most importantly, sweat.

    As I post this, St. Louis Misery has 103F with a dew point of 68F, a nice dry RH of 33%. Somehow I don't think they feel "dry."

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  122. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to cite anything the minutemen (which doesn't even exist anymore) have done illegal?

    Not just your shithole running either, a real cite.

  123. Vegas = Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vegas = Phoenix minus slot machines and nightlife. Zappos blew up out of the blue in Vegas and others seem to be popping up as well. :)

  124. Any company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That moves its headquarters to that racist state will NEVER get my business. EVER.

    1. Re:Any company by tickticker · · Score: 1

      I suggest you put down most of your computing devices then. Intel is HUGE here, as is Motorola and Microchip. American Express and Goodyear Tire are also huge here (eg Goodyear, AZ is a real town named after.... Goodyear Tire). So no electronics for you, no plane rides (who do you think makes the tires for the planes and the emergency chutes you jump on to escape the plane?), lose those tires. Cut up that card.

      Oh, and if the AC is calling my died in the wool liberal wife racist? Get a life. A state isn't racist, mentally handicapped conservatives in the state legislature are. They get voted in by snowbirds, the elderly who relocate here 6 months out of the year. Like your grandparents.

  125. Please don't exaggerate by overshoot · · Score: 1

    Then you have unfriendly weather climates (hello 120+ degrees).

    Now, now. We only hit 50C once, although 115F comes around about once a year on average.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Please don't exaggerate by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      it's the "above 100 degrees" that easily is dangerous enough. Adding another 10 degrees there is simply even worse.

  126. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by slippyblade · · Score: 1

    Doesn't exist anymore? I think their website disagrees with you. And a simple wiki lookup shows the nonsense they've done over the years.

  127. The good, the bad and the ugly by byteherder · · Score: 1

    I used to live in Phoenix for a long time. Like any big city it has its good points and its bad points. As a hub for high tech, it has a ways to go.
    Intel has a huge presence there, so does, American Express, Honeywell, Paypal, Freeport-McMoran. Freescale used to. Phoenix is more high tech than most people know.

    The good:
    - Good weather 9 months out of they year. That is opposed to most places that have maybe 6-7 marginally passable months.
    - Reasonably priced housing.
    - Talented technical subculture
    - Salaries in the midrange.


    The bad
    - There are those 3 months out of the year.
    - Talent pool is good but not huge like Silicon Valley


    The ugly
    - Almost no venture funding. If you want funding, you have to look out of state.

  128. This isn't the Valley you're looking for by overshoot · · Score: 2

    Where the heck do you live?

    "The Valley" he refers to is "Silicon Valley," not "the Valley of the Sun."

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:This isn't the Valley you're looking for by slippyblade · · Score: 1

      Doh! Phoenix is referred to as "The Valley of the Sun" or more commonly simple "The Valley". Totally my screw up there. I thought he was talking about Phoenix in his post.

    2. Re:This isn't the Valley you're looking for by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Where the heck do you live?

      "The Valley" he refers to is "Silicon Valley," not "the Valley of the Sun."

      Come on, lighten up and give him a break. He's from Phoenix you know.

  129. Ari-racist-zona? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, no. See, the prime ingredient in a flourishing tech culture is talented people. Talented people tend to come in all shapes and colors and be mobile enough to choose where to live, so it's hard to attract them to an arid hellhole where everyone who isn't white has to worry about getting arrested if they leave the house without papers.

  130. Austin, TX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the next Silicon Valley. Many companies from Silicon Valley are already moving here including the one I work for today. A few of my friends also work for companies that have been making their way from CA to TX.

  131. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "people to whom issues like that matter immensely"

    Who died and put you in charge?

    Illegal invasion of our border *actually* matters to those of us who are citizens and those of us who play by the rules.

    Any questions?

  132. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said sir.

  133. Bay area is overrated anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the jobs are controlled by indians and there are drunks and homeless people everywhere.

  134. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

    You can determine who's an illegal just by looking at them, and discriminate accordingly? I don't think so. The police are empowered to ask for "papers, please" of anyone that they "suspect of being illegal". Which practically means, anyone mocha colored.

    I'm actually curious to know how you're supposed to "prove citizenship". Is a driver's license enough? What if you're not driving? Are you supposed to walk around with a birth certificate at all times? Do the white folks do that too, to prove that they're not illegal from Canada?

    If white folks don't feel at risk enough to carry "proof of citizenship" while not driving, because they know that they won't actually be required to show citizenship at an indiscriminate time, the police are simply racial profiling. Or, by any other name, being racist.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  135. Re:No by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    What about Arizona's tax-and-spend habit? I live here in Phoenix and the taxes are pretty high: income tax, 9.0+% sales tax, property tax, etc. It's NOT cheap to live here. Maybe compared to the Bay Area it's cheap, but compared to most of the rest of the country, it's expensive as hell, and you aren't getting anything for it, because this city is a shithole. Back on the east coast, the sales taxes are all around 5%, and in states like Oregon, there's no income tax.

  136. What I like about Phoenix by mike449 · · Score: 1

    I work here since 2009. I was basically forced to move here when my previous employer closed shop and this was the best job I was able to find back then.
    Yes, it is hot in summer. And I hate scorpions that crawl inside the house.
    But there are some good things about this place, too:
      - I can afford a nice house with a pool in a good neighborhood 2 miles from the office. Nowhere else I would be able to live in such luxury. Maybe in Austin. In California, I would be living in a tiny townhouse that would cost me more (in percents of my salary), and commuting on a congested highway an hour one way.
      - I bike to work every working day of every month, even in 115 degree heat. It is not bad at all because of the short distance and dry air. Also, the morning and the evening temperature is significantly lower than the max.
      - Quite a few outdoor attractions are within driving distance: Sedona, Grand Canyon, Mogollon Rim, etc.
      - Winter is nice. I like snow, so we drive to Flagstaff every now and then for some fun

  137. Re:No by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but when you look at population, Phoenix (metro area) IS Arizona. There's over 4 million people in Phoenix, and about 6.5 million in the entire state according to Wikipedia. The rest of the state is a minority compared to Phoenix.

  138. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So refusing to answer questions results in imprisonment? Gee I can't see why Arizona has an image problem.

  139. Re:No by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but Mesa is absolutely part of the Phoenix metro area, regardless of your personal opinion. So are Tempe, Chandler, Gilbert, Queen Creek, Scottsdale, Peoria, Glendale, Sun City, Buckeye, etc.

  140. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said.

    "I do not hide under an AC"

    You must not make too many challenging posts, whenever I do I get modded down and posting privileges are removed. I'm curious what you say about this. Otherwise I would prefer posting as me.

    "H1b1 and greencards are welcome and an important step but Arizona is the only state that had the balls to do it..."

    We have to understand that there are two different subjects being discussed here, legal immigration and illegal immigration. They are not the same.

    The law does not state that people from Mexico cannot become citizens or apply through legal means to be in this country. This is a straw man designed to paint those of us who stand for the rule of law as racists. It is false. The fact is that most of the people in this area may be Mexican is because, wait for it, the place has a border with Mexico.

    There is nothing wrong with any person who is legally in this country for any reason, to work or for an education or anything.

    But the two are not the same, do not let them conflate these points as this only serves to distract and confuse the real issue, people who are breaking the law.

    The law by the way that Obama pledged to enforce, and is ignoring.

  141. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, excuse me, attacking the mans grammar does not constitute an argument against his points.

    And his grammer aint that bad anyways.

    So, you fail.

  142. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I have a problem with H1B workers, or more specifically the system that creates them. They shouldn't exist. If we want them to come here and do tech jobs, then they should be allowed to just immigrate here and work, without any strings. Instead, we have an evil system that ties them to the employer that sponsored their visa, so they're unable to leave if that employer mistreats or underpays them. This essentially makes them into indentured servants.

  143. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If high up executives in companies that rely on illegal workers were actually held to account and made to follow the law - by incarceration I mean, it would take but a few of them for the practice to stop from coast to coast. (Mr. Marriott I am looking at you). And by and large the illegal immigrant problem would be solved by self-deportation in short order.

    Mind you that does not mean we should leave the borders unprotected, but you are quite correct, the root of this problem is in the benefits that the non-citizen enjoys.

    Note that if you are caught driving without insurance you will end up paying in both money and your liberties. The illegal will be allowed to go his way.

    If you go to a hospital for healthcare and have no insurance - you will be billed and you will be made to pay. The illegal will not, but he will get the same care.

    This is because you are rich, don't you know? The illegal now constitutes a class that is essentially unaccountable for themselves and yet is free to enjoy the benefits of this society. This is not right.

  144. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a poor, miserable soul you are.

    I pitty you.

  145. Hot, hot, hot by klui · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it's the next silicon valley but I had a layover there last Friday and it was hot, hot, hot at a scorching 109 degrees F at around 2PM. Our plane overheated while it was at the terminal.

  146. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess 55% of Americans are old white men angrily brandishing guns.

    Not that I'd have any problem with that.

  147. No. by amacbride · · Score: 1

    Even if you were to ignore the universities (Berkeley, Stanford, UCSF), the high-tech economy, the VC ecosystem, and every other good man-made thing about the Bay Area, there are still two fundamentals: gorgeous natural settings, and weather. Those aren't going away even if (when) the economy tanks, and those are two things that give property values some resilience. It's fundamentally a nice place to live.

    (Something for everyone: cool and pleasant in SF, toasty and pleasant on the Peninsula.)

    When property values dipped in 2007-2009, people who've lived here for a decent amount of time pretty much just shrugged and decided to wait it out.

    Even with the hassles (too many people, too much traffic, the occasional pesky earthquake), it's one of very few places in the US that attracts the depth and breadth of technical talent that's required for a thriving high-tech ecosystem. (I'd put Boston, Seattle, and maybe Austin on that list as well.) All of those are also well-known as tolerant and reasonably-diverse cites.

    Phoenix? Nice to visit, but not even in the same class.

  148. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am speaking in the philosophical sense of what is right and wrong. I am not referring to the "minutemen", frankly I know next to nothing about them.

    The analogy of defending your home to defending the borders of this republic is perfectly apt.

    I note that you fail to address it, and you have also failed to present your home address. We are waiting.

  149. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  150. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You liberals ... classy resorting to name calling. You are doing just what the owners of this country, you know the people with the deep pockets on the left and the right, want us to do. Divide ourselves. Unfortunately politics aren't so black and white but when people only see in one of the two colors, their opinions get jaded.

  151. Research Triangle Park by duckintheface · · Score: 1

    The next Silicon Valley already exists. It's called RTP (Research Triangle Park, North Carolina). RTP is the largest concentration of PhDs in the world. It is the home of countless tech startups. My daughter worked for an RTP game engine company for two years, then went to work for Duke University for two years and next week is joining an internet advertising startup at RTP. This back and forth synergy between RTP and the major universities in the area (UNC- Chapel Hill, Duke, and NC State) is a major driving force. RTP is on the leading edge of biotech innovation. UNC is building Carolina North in Chapel Hill which will be a world class biotech incubator and the seat of UNCs science graduate programs. The Duke Medical Center and UNC Hospitals offer the clinical trial infrastructure that biotech startups require. Most major tech companies already have a research facility at RTP and many are expanding even in this depression we are currently in. The quality of life and cost of living certainly beat Palo Alto and Phoenix (maybe not San Francisco yet :) You just have to learn to like grits.

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
  152. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by zieroh · · Score: 1

    "people to whom issues like that matter immensely"

    Who died and put you in charge?

    Illegal invasion of our border *actually* matters to those of us who are citizens and those of us who play by the rules.

    Any questions?

    Yes, I've got one: how come you keep posting as an anonymous coward? Are you so ashamed of your right-wing opinions that you're afraid to attach even a pseudonym to your words?

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  153. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by BoogeyOfTheMan · · Score: 1

    No one gives a rats ass about LEGAL hispanics. Hell, when I lived there, 80% of my friends were hispanic and they talked more shit about illegals than anyone else I have ever met.

  154. Nope by Ranger · · Score: 1

    As long as Arizona is governed by bible thumping racist assholes, Phoenix will not be the next Silicon valley. It won't be much of anything. Our only hope is that global warming makes the Phoenix valley uninhabitable and forces the inhabitants to disperse, something like what Katrina did to New Orleans.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  155. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by docmordin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since you didn't bother to specify which, now disbanded, Arizonian "minutemen" group, there's the murders of Raul and Brisenia Flores by Shawna Forde (State of Arizona vs. Shawna Forde (court case number CR-20092300-001, Pima County)), the founder of the splinter group Minutemen American Defense, and Jason Bush (State of Arizona vs. Jason Eugene Bush (court case number CR-20092300-003, Pima County)).

  156. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

    What about the innocent, but accused? You did know that the majority of Tent Citie's population are merely accused and awaiting trial, right?

    Citation?

  157. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    His numbers are right, but he's still misguided.

    "The Maricopa County jail system, administered by Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, holds about 9,000 inmates, 70 percent of whom are pre-trial detainees."

    First, Sheriff Joe has no say in who the courts decide needs to be detained pre-trail and which defendants get to be set free. Second, there's a fairly good standard for the sort of repeat or (suspected) dangerous criminals that are held in police custody awaiting trial.

    The people sitting in jail for more than a day sobering up are either violent, repeat offenders, or flight risks. ...because a JUDGE said so. They were arraigned in front of a judge and now they're awaiting trial. They are being held in due process of law, not on Joe's whim, and not without having been in front of a judge.

    Sheriff Joe doesn't decide who's held awaiting trial and who isn't. He only gets to make decisions about the conditions of those who are.

    We like when our pretrial detainees go there too. :)

  158. Re:No by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    You realize that Joe Arpaio is the SHERIFF in the MARICOPA COUNTY.
    Not Arizona.
    If you only knew wtf was happening, you wouldn't say it's an embarrassment, you'd be patting him on the back. There's nothing wrong with sending illegal immigrants back to their country, no matter how much you want them here. They're "Illegal". That word means something, no matter how cool you think they are.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  159. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > You're missing the point. The fact that Arizona has a cultural image problem with a big hunk of the population is likely to make it more difficult to recruit talent, which is essential to the success or failure of any company, and start-ups in particular

    Yup, all those illegal mexican coders...

  160. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always surprised that Maricopa residents defend Arpaio for being tough on crime, but completely ignore how corrupt his office is (bungled sex crimes investigations, conflicts of interest with prison concessions, etc) - plus as someone else pointed out..many people in Tent City are simply accused and waiting for trial. How these are considered positives eludes me.

    The general attitude in Arizona towards both Mexican nationals and legal immigrants borders on the sociopathic. When you combine a law legalizing and mandating ethnic profiling with Arpaio's deputization program, at best you'll get Pinkerton thugs and at worst you'll get honest to goodness Brownshirts.

  161. Re:Arizona has more severe budget problems by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    Not as broke as all 23 states in Australia, or 31 states in Great Britain!

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  162. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Vegas.

  163. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bla? You admitting you're a sphincter?

  164. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    . In the current political climate, as an immigrant, I am avoiding Arizona entirely unless it's absolutely required.

    Believe me, you're safe as long as you're not ILLEGAL.

    There are lots of immigrants there, Arizona just doesn't like those that are there illegally. That's all.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  165. Water,, water, water. by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    The available water is already over-subscribed for the current population and industry of Az and, with the effect of global warming, drought is settling in for the foreseeable future. If all these people are gonna move in, what are they going to drink?

  166. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Yakasha · · Score: 1

    You can determine who's an illegal just by looking at them, and discriminate accordingly? I don't think so. The police are empowered to ask for "papers, please" of anyone that they "suspect of being illegal". Which practically means, anyone mocha colored.

    I keep hearing that stupid argument. "suspect of being illegal" is no different than any other probable cause argument! "suspect of carrying illegal substances", "suspected of lying about your identity", "suspected of beating your wife", "suspected of robbing a bank", "suspected of being here illegally". They all use the same psychology research to follow up on, and all follow the same lawful requirement: probable cause.

    When people do something they're not supposed to do, they get nervous and act it. It doesn't matter if they just jumped the fence from Mexico, or knowingly ran a red light, or raped your sister. If you ask them simple questions concerning the topic they are anxious about, they'll get flustered, or sound like their answers are rehearsed, or do something else that gives them away. Once you've given yourself away on where you live, where you're from, where you're going, where you work, or any of a million different questions that cops ask absolutely every person they ever pull over, THEN they'll ask for your papers.

  167. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    the name "minutemen" is used for unofficial "posse" style people who create vigilante groups and go into the desert with guns. They use that name to make themselves feel like they're holding the fort for the country, at the border.

    Now, I'm sure you can extrapolate.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  168. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Nice ad hominem.

    Even if they do speak and work better, they are still illegals and thus companies get away with paying them less. Such a thing, when so prevalent, really does push things down in the area.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  169. arizona is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get fucking real. what educated person wants to move to a roasting hot dump filled with gun toting hill billies?

  170. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a non-immigrant, between the TSA molestors, the shit-headed immigration officers, and the paperwork hassles, I'd rather avoid flying over US air space altogether.

  171. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    shut up, faggot.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  172. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually federal law already requires ALL immigrants to register and carry some form of documentation at all times, legal or otherwise. A green card will suffice.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1304
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1306

    So the "papers please" argument already applies nationwide.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  173. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Soporific · · Score: 1

    Give it a rest already.

    ~S

  174. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like Ichiro Yada who was stopped at a check point in Alabama and was ticketed and held for deportation under Alabama's new tough immigration laws EVEN THOUGH he presented an international driver's licence, a valid passport and a US work permit? Alabama's new tough immigration laws aren't as tough as Arizona's laws, No propaganda just a clear understanding of what Russel Pearce, Joe Aripio, and Jan Brewer are like and the fact that they represent the "best" or Arizona.

  175. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey - what happened to your 'my momma ignored me as a child, this is how I get attention' fixed-width font?

  176. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A sphincter says what?

  177. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical content free leftist response. This is the best you've got?

    Fail.

  178. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

    Any other questions, statist?

  179. Phoenix Will Never be Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried starting multiple businesses in Phoenix and all failed for one reason. All the investors were all real estate investors so couldn't understand technology at all. Phoenix doesn't have the money that understands technology to make it the next Silicon Valley. I had to leave Phoenix and once I did had investor after investor interested. The government has tried to give incentives to drive it to be the next Silicon Valley for biotechnology, but as far as I know none of these have really worked out. What does Phoenix provide to "get away" for those with talent? It's hot hotter than hell, there is a reason senior citizens choose Phoenix to be home. The only tech Phoenix could provide is to be a solar generator and that's about it. I hated every minute I lived in Phoenix and will never step foot in that city again.

  180. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by tranquilidad · · Score: 1

    OK, this nonsense has gone on far enough.

    People who are just walking around are not being stopped and were not being stopped.

    The majority of stops are due to driving infractions. If the driver doesn't have a license then the LEO will start questioning why and develop probable cause that the person is in the country illegally. Someone in the country illegally can not get a driver's license.

    So, how should this be handled - cop pulls someone over for speeding. Driver doesn't have a driver's license and, probably, no insurance - the two issues are often related. The person is already in enough trouble for speeding, driving without a license and driving without insurance. If the person speaks English as a second language then maybe, just maybe, the cop is justified in finding out if the person is in the country legally. It is the combination - stopped for a traffic infraction and lacking a driver's license that starts the ball rolling by giving some reasonably articulable suspicion that the person may not be here legally.

    I grew up near D.C., spent twenty years in Silicon Valley and I've spent the last five in Scottsdale.

    When I first moved from D.C. to Silicon Valley I was impressed with how laid back the culture was compared to D.C. When I first moved here I was impressed with how much friendlier it is here than in Silicon Valley.

    If you don't want to move here then don't. But don't convince yourself that the crap you hear on the news has any basis in reality about how things work here. What makes the news is what's different from the "local" culture. Arizona is different from your local culture and the "local" culture of the national media. Fact is, Arizona is currently considered a toss-up state in the presidential election. I would argue that that indicates a more balanced approach to life than a locked-in state like California.

    There is a stronger sense of law-and-order here as well as a stronger sense of personal responsibility and accountability here than there is in the larger population centers in California. Some of us like it that way and that's why we moved here. Some of you don't like it and prefer the warmth and comfort you get from a more involved government entity.

  181. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Soporific · · Score: 1

    It wasn't a question. You are just spamming the thread with the same post at this point. But I guess if that gives you your jollys...

    ~S

  182. Jeez. by sootman · · Score: 1

    I assume the other 351 comments here are all saying "no" so I hope I don't get modded "redundant" for supplying the 352nd.

    Most cities in the US have a tech startup or two. They are not exclusive to Silicon Valley. That does not mean those cities will become the "next" Silicon Valley. What does Silicon Valley have to offer?

    - History. It got its name because so many of the early tech greats--Intel, HP, Apple--started out there.
    - School. Stanford attracts a lot of bright people. From Wikipedia: "Stanford alumni have started many companies including Hewlett-Packard, Cisco Systems, Nvidia, SGI, MIPS Technologies, Yahoo!, Google, Logitech, Instagram, and Sun Microsystems."
    - Money. The venture capitalists on Page Mill are legendary. Wikipedia says "Despite the development of other high-tech economic centers throughout the United States and the world, Silicon Valley continues to be the leading hub for high-tech innovation and development, accounting for one-third (1/3) of all of the venture capital investment in the United States."
    - Weather. Mild climate and it never snows. (Snow is great, but it's for visiting, not living in.)
    - Geography. Within a four-hour drive you have beaches, mountains, and forests. You can surf and ski in the same day.

    Put that all together, let it stew for 70 years (HP was founded in 1939) and you'll get Silicon Valley.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  183. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You are just spamming the thread with the same post at this point"

    No I am not, you are. You have failed to present any substance or argument whatsoever. I have not.

    Fail.

    Good night, thanks for playing.

  184. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by tranquilidad · · Score: 1

    On your final paragraph, Johnny, I get stopped everytime I drive through New Mexico and Texas and have to demonstrate to a Border Patrol Agent that I'm a U.S. citizen or else show papers that I'm here legally. I also get the pleasure of having a drug detecting dog sniff around my car.

    Everyone gets stopped in many places around this country by the feds for the sole purpose of a citizenship and drug check - merely for having the temerity to be driving down the road in the U.S.

    These programs have expanded under the current administration and now feature face-recognition cameras as well as the "papers please" stops.

    I suggest just a little more research before you go off about racist cops and people being asked for their papers for no apparent reason.

  185. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Things like Tent City suck, and we like when our criminals get sent there. We like that he deputizes people to track down deadbeat dads or keep gangbangers out of mall parking lots. We like that he's a mean son of a bitch. We want our stupid kids locked up and put in a chain-gang for the week when they get a drunk driving charge.

    Yes, and the fact that you will elect a man based on liking these specific attributes confirms that the national media portrayal of Arizona is quite accurate.

  186. "different quality of life" == racism+profiling? by cpotoso · · Score: 1
    "due to its much lower cost of living and different quality of life"

    Point 1 maybe... point 2??? "different quality of life" is that a new euphemism for the racial profiling, bigotry and racism of AZ? Thanks but I pass.

  187. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Sheriff Joe doesn't send officers to Alabama. Try at least to stay on topic, or at least relevant, despite your nebulous status of anonymity.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  188. Utah. by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 1

    Utah is where you go when you are a geek and want to raise a family. If you have never been in a relationship (most of you), consider joining the Mormons. They will have you married for "all eternity" by the weekend to a Marie or Donnie Osmond clone.

    Orgs doing interesting things here:
    HP, Adobe, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Intel, Micron, AtTask, Alfresco, Novell, Symantec, Verio, NSA (DoD), Overstock, Backcountry, FusionIO, and many, many more.

    On second thought.... I've seen what you guys have done to California. Maybe you better go to Arizona instead.

  189. What I like about Phoenix by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Is that you can drive away from it.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  190. It's not *that* bad, but I don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fellow Tempe resident. It's not *that* bad. I certainly haven't had any home invasions or road rage shootings. There are idiot drivers everywhere and at least we have good driving conditions 99% of the year, except for the insanely hot steering wheels during the summer.

    That said, I have no delusions that we're the next SV. There isn't enough tech here, there isn't enough talent here, light rail & buses just don't cut it for public transportation, and there isn't enough money here. The only nice parts are probably in Scottsdale. The heat probably doesn't help either, but you get used to it. Also, ASU isn't exactly known for high quality education (I say this as an alumnus), though it is improving a bit.

  191. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

    Things like Tent City suck, and we like when our criminals get sent there.

    What about the innocent, but accused? You did know that the majority of Tent Citie's population are merely accused and awaiting trial, right?

    But I'm wasting my time. You're exactly the kind of authoritarian asshole that keeps any sort of sensible person out of Phoenix. I hope you get falsely accused of a crime in August.

    You sound as if these inmates are getting injured. Despite what you have been told in the news, the human body adapts to desert climates just fine when hydrated. It is also a crime in AZ to deny water to anyone who asks. As far as I know nobody has ever been denied access to water at this jail. Those awaiting trial are required to be charged with a crime and have bond set by a judge just like any other jail.
    Jail isn't supposed to be comfortable. I don't see the problem here.

  192. The Next Death Valley by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    "And with living and business expenses at barely 40% of the big cities..."

    Yes, it's cheap to live and work over there. I can believe that.

  193. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Not just the legal immigrants. George Lopez has a joke about his father being rabid on the subject of illegal immigration, even though he himself arrived in LA in the trunk of a car.

    So yeah, I'm sure there are lots of immigrants who take the hard line. But your claim that all the ones you know are anti-undocs is a glib implausibility. I suspect that a more scientific survey would show that most people aren't happy about being in a permanent hassle because they have dark skin or funny accents.

    Incidentally, guess who's an immigrant: me. But I'm a white guy from Canada, so I don't worry too much about being hassled. Still, I'd make sure my paperwork is order before visiting Arizona. I've already had some minor hassles after moving from California to Oregon. This "Illegals Are Destroying America" bit is just plain lame.

  194. The next Silicon Valley by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been in this field for a long-long time

    I was in the Silicon Valley when the thing got started and I benefited handsomely

    IMHO, the "Silicon Valley Phenomenon" is a one-time happening

    It happened because of many factors

    * The concentration of critical mass of coherent talents - mostly comprised of remnants of the hippies with their Groovy mindset, and earlier batch of the baby boomers who were, in one way or another, influenced by the hippies culture

    * It occurred at a time when the "change culture" finally arrived at the tech scene - with hobbyists earnestly believed that they could build their own gadgets with solders and breadboards

    * And the Silicon Valley happened to provide a venue, the place, for the talents to gather and trade their ideas

    We also need to understand that the Silicon Valley phenomenon occurred way before Internet - which means, people _still_ had to congregate in ONE PHYSICAL PLACE in order to trade ideas

    With Internet, people no longer need to gather physically in one place in order to trade ideas

    There have been many attempts in repeating the "Silicon Valley Success" all over the world - from Boston USA to East London, UK to Japan to even third world countries such as Malaysia, but none ever achieve same level of success as Silicon Valley

    Why?

    Simply because there is no need for yet-another Silicon Valley

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:The next Silicon Valley by bmarkovic · · Score: 1

      Perhaps... but I beleive it's the concentration of open-walleted investors and the whole VC concept that made Sillicon Valley what it is. There are smart people everywhere in the world. If concentration of uber-smart people was THE requirement it would have been, say, Mumbai, but Indians are skint and famously mingy so it's not. Those brilliant global PhDs wouldn't concentrate in SoCa if weren't for the money that was very willing to mobilize.

      It's still so. It's still much easier to get funding if your start-up's addy is in the vincinity of SF bay area even tho you can do great things everywhere. Sadly, in many cases underfunded ventures don't go anywhere. There is a whole history technically superior products originating outside SV and failing mostly due to underfunding. The times are changing tho, internetization and production outsourcing to China democratized the market, and OTOH many policy makers in EU for example are understanding the need to angel fund tech startups, which is why there are now more successful tech companies coming from EU than ever.

    2. Re:The next Silicon Valley by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

      We were there before the open-walleted investors

      Who do you think gave birth to the VC concept?

      Hint: Sure ain't from the folks in Wall Street
       

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    3. Re:The next Silicon Valley by Vixe · · Score: 1

      I moved down here a couple months ago and I can attest that the city is a pile of shit.

    4. Re:The next Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also was "there". You are right on the mark on all points. Physical proximity is critical to high tech.

      This is why you can't find a decent electronics parts store in Silicon Valley now, but it's a whole other situation in Taipei, Shanghai or Tokyo - DIY and professional nirvana because much of Silicon Valley was outsourced in the 1990s to these locations. The infrastructure of supply chains went with outsourcing. The only issue however is these Asian countries aren't risk takers like Silicon Valley was. And now the infrastructure to incubate high tech isn't in Silicon Valley either. This is why neither region can re-create what Silicon Valley was. The Golden Goose is dead and can't be reincarnated in either place. The one-time "miracle" likely won't happen again.

  195. The Bay Area is where venture capitalists live. by superdude72 · · Score: 1

    Lost in these articles about all the virtues of areas outside Silicon Valley is the fact that the capitalization of Silicon Valley venture capital firms is an order of magnitude larger than the nearest competitors in New York City and Boston. Nowhere is even close when it comes to throwing money at startups. Where does Phoenix rate? It doesn't. If someone has a brilliant startup in Phoenix, and they manage to wrangle some venture capital, the first thing their investors will do is move them to Silicon Valley so they can keep tabs on them.

  196. the next silicon valley is not in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nor Asia, nor Africa, but Europe, actually London

  197. Schools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone ought to mention Stanford and Berkeley as very major contributions to the success of Silicon Valley. And what Indian engineer wants to risk being harasses by Arizona cops for being on the wrong street corner with the wrong color skin.

  198. Replying to myself to fix a mistake... by artor3 · · Score: 1

    Ack, I accidentally deleted a couple of the budget lines when reformatting.

    Roll back estate & capital gains taxes to Clinton era levels. Don't claim it will discourage investment, as there was plenty of investment back then: $80B
    Eliminate corporate tax loopholes, while reducing the overall rates. Added benefit of making business a heck of a lot simpler: $80B

    The numbers are mostly from the NY Times budget deficit "puzzle" from a couple years back, rounded to the nearest $10B.

  199. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dumbass I am also a resident and unlike you I actually know a few facts about Arpaio.
    1. Maricopa County has the most unserved felony warranst of any county in the country.
    2. His jails are out iof control which is why county residents pay millions in the many lawsuits he has lost.
    3. He had zero interest in illegals which he stated publically many times until his legal troubles began. All of a sudden he was head illegal catcher to get the support if the rubes and there are many rubes here. However he hasn't caught many illegals but since illegals caught by ICE go to his jails he takes the credit for them.

    In short Arpaio is incompetent, corrupt, a serial air, and a bully. Like most bullies he is also a physical coward.
    Also who is this " we" you refer to? I'm not part of your little club.

    As to Phoenix is is hot as hell here with ever increasing dust storms and the state is run by realtors, Mormons, and angry old east coast retirees. Sounds like heaven right?

  200. My take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've lived in Phoenix most of my life and now live in Silicon Valley. I got my start in Phoenix thanks to the tech friendly businesses that were started elsewhere (SV) and moved to Phoenix to continue operations at a greatly discounted rate. The political culture is horrible, so is the weather. Notable exceptions to wretchedness are certain parts of Scottsdale and Tempe and in general, there are great people everywhere and PHX is no exception. I think it's a great place to raise children and live cheap, but as always, you get what you pay for in this world. The benefits of living in SV are immense, especially if you are in technology and/or legal (amongst other fields). I can ride my bike nearly everyday all year and probably eat about a thousand times better. The air is cleaner, weather is nicer and being close to tons of great farms, wineries, and the ocean for fishing (I've done them all and experiencing them is great) make it worth the extra money. Not to mention the population is generally much better educated (and really what I mean is much more intelligent, but that is probably going out on a limb when thinking about Jan Brewer and Arpaio types that are pervasive in PHX)

    I'm in agreement that there will never be another SV, not now that the Internet exists. When SV was coming together, businesses had to be experts and everyone had to physically be there or getting anything done would be a nightmare of endless roadblocks. If there is anything like SV, it's israel, which I haven't seen mentioned here yet strangely.

  201. Keeps out the riff-raff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's expensive to live here.

    But the high cost of living also keeps out the "hanger-on'er" and other lower qualified people.

    There's a constant inflow of highly talented people who want to come here because myth has it it's the coolest place to be.
    The one's not making the cut have to leave again
    The good ones stay, and make great things.

    It's a self fulfilling prophecy.
    And it keeps itself going.

    As long as the valley can attract the best and brightest minds it will work.

    Now, if the Gub'mint in its infinitive wisdom makes it nearly impossible to move here for highly talented and motivated foreigners - now, that will kill the valley, and other places like it.

  202. Re:No by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I live oin Gilbert. I do not live in Phoenix.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  203. Defensive much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't bicycle here (one of my favorite outdoor activities) because of the heat most of the year

    People bike here year round, Facebook posts from other people doing just that are proof. You choose not to, that doesn't mean other people don't do it also. There are people enjoying the Phoenix Mountain Preserve, Dreamy Draw, and South Mountain year round.

    Any city is going to have die hard cyclists that are willing to ride in anything. However, if you think that a place with inconsiderate drivers, scarce bicycle lanes, spottily maintained sidewalks and 100+ degree days is pedestrian friendly, you're delusional. Even Santa Clara is practically a paradise compared to Phoenix.

    They used to have Mill Avenue in Tempe that was kinda fun to walk along, which used to have a bunch of quirky little independent shops, but the Tempe government drove all those out of business to make room for a bunch of mall stores and high-rises, which of course went south when the economy crashed, so most of the place is boarded up now.

    Really? The main recreational area next to the largest university by enrollment in the country is boarded up now, huh? That's weird.

    As an ASU student (spare your derision please) who practically lived on Mill Avenue for four years, I can't agree. Redevelopment has raised property values around Mill significantly, which has pushed out many of the older businesses most people would associate with `local color'. Taking their place are cookie cutter franchises (Mellow Mushroom, Urban Outfitters, Jimmy John's) that thrive on indiscriminate student spending. Things may still be better than the rest of the valley, but with neighbors that add whole new dimensions to the word "plastic" (Scottsdale, anyone?) that isn't saying much.

    1. Re:Defensive much? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Even Santa Clara is practically a paradise [walkscore.com] compared to Phoenix.

      That data does show Phoenix above the national average. Tempe is way above average.

      They built the Brickyard right after I graduated, as a computer science student I would have loved that resource. I don't doubt there are chains on Mill now, but that's a far cry from everything being boarded up. At least there's still Greasy Tony's and the Chuck Box. I heard Hooter's caught on fire though. Again.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  204. Re:No by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    It's all the same metro area.

  205. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Good night, thanks for playing." is a fail unto itself. Please fuck off.

  206. Not Phoenix...Las Vegas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep I said it.

  207. Why am I all salty? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > who picked Phoenix due to...different quality of life

    Lolz. They picked it because there is a computer engineering base there with Intel having a giant manufacturing campus there because the air, hot as it is, is very clean and thus easier to filter for chipmaking.

    Anyway, how's the quality of life? Better? "Different."

    "Ok I'm gonna open the door. Walk, don't run, to the car. Open the doors but don't get in yet. And don't touch any metal. God help yor soul if you do. Go go go go!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  208. Okay by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Here's a good reason nothing will come of this: Jan Brewer. Here's another: Joe Arpaio.
    Adding in that this state actively resisted a Federal holiday for Martin Luther King, it becomes clear Arizona is merely 19th century Alabama with cactii.

  209. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    So, why are you an immigrant to the U.S., since you believe that the federal laws, which Arizona law merely authorizes Arizona Law Enforcement Officers to enforce, are "plainly discriminatory and largely driven by old white men angrily brandishing guns?"

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  210. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    FYI, I am a green card holder, not an H1-B. I came over on a K1 fiance visa from Canada to marry my (now) wife.

    As far as your argument that ICE can't be trusted because *insert conspiracy theory involving Obama here*, I don't respond to insanity.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  211. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by popeye44 · · Score: 1

    40% of Phoenix is Hispanic, 41% of Tuscon,

    So again, how is AZ racist?
    Any Illegal with a grain of brain power would pass through AZ to California where they will be welcomed with open arms.

    Anyone who comes here illegally by definition is a criminal.
    The fact is the law exists but is not enforced worth a shit.

    We live in a country that is in some cases 20 times some others in size. Yet if anyone went to France tomorrow and Spain the next day they would find an enormous difference in customs, laws and Culture. Who are we to say that States here cannot have some differences in laws, customs and culture? I'm no farther from Fresno, Ca than I would be from Pamplona Spain to Limoges France. To expect every state to have the exact same culture and values is moronic.

    You don't like it fine, but no one is forcing you to move there and live.

    The people there want laws to have value, the current laws are being ignored by the the U.S Government if we go down this path of ignoring laws where do we stop?
    Are we going to pick and choose which one's we're going to follow today?

    --
    Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
  212. It's already happening by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    There are lots of tech companies down in the valley. Technologic Systems is in Fountain Hills (on Laser Drive :-). There are many PCB assembly houses there too. And Advanced Circuits that does custom PCB fabrication just set up a facility there. Cost of living is far lower and the tax system is much more conducive than the Bay area. Want even cheaper? Set up shop in Prescott or Prescott Valley.

  213. Arizona? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isnt that one of our certifiable crazy states? who will maintain the lawns, if they kick out all the undocumented workers? and how will people live when the colorado river runs dry, as some climatologists are predicting for this century. Pheonix is just one city, in the middle of a desert. The Bay Area is perfect in so many ways, its why it started there. the only reason it may be slumping is for overall economic reasons, not cause we are played out.

  214. Corporation friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only advantage Phoenix has is that it's cheap for the companies. There's no real benefit for particular individuals.

  215. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the national media likes to paint of Arizona is fairly inaccurate - especially when it comes to the people working in technology. ...

    Thanks for confirming my suspicion.

    Despite Joe's antics, he'll get elected again because his politics aren't what most of the voting populous of AZ cares about."

    Then the people who work in technology don't like "most of the voting populace" of AZ, and all of their politics.

    "because he's not a position in our government where it matters."

    He's in a position to be a racist piece of shit and your state enables him to do so. Do you think WE care about the birther nonsense? Not so much as the rest of his actions.

  216. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is funny, because the person you're talking to IS "like that".

  217. Next Silicon Valley - in 1970. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My family moved to the Phoenix area in 1968. Motorola and AiResearch were the big, high tech employers. Phoenix was going to be the next Silicon Valley by 1970 ... 1975 at the latest. We had the lowest utility rates in the country.

    So now Motorola is gone, Walmart is the biggest employer. It costs $200 - $500 per month to run your air conditioning during the five-month summer. Public transportation either does not go where you need to go, or doesn't run when you need it.

    At least the one light-rail line will connect to Sky Harbor airport in another year or so. Welcome to Arizona! Now go home.

  218. I've live in Silicon Valley for 20 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've live in Silicon Valley for 20 years... and Phoenix, you're no Silicon Valley.

    (reference to: Dan Quayle comparing himself to JFK)

  219. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refusing to talk to the officer ? this is a right enshrined in the Constitution.

    Convenient to skip over the rest of what he said. If you're driving a vehicle and you are stopped you must provide ID. It's a requirement every operator of a motor vehicle is required to do especially when asked by an officer at a traffic stop. Full stop.

    Answer questions and don't try to hide ? Are you hearing yourself ? You're a lot farther on the police state slope than I thought.

    So says the AC (I've already modded in this discussion hence the AC). It's nothing new to present ID when driving. What IS new are sanctuary cities. One million people are let into the US yearly legally who are legal permanent resident status. More than the entire world combined and yet we still have problems with illegal immigration and the failure of our government to enforce our borders. Checking for valid ID when on the road is not remotely a "police state" go try driving around in Europe without a license and see how far you get.

  220. Yes, Phoenix! Er, Chandler...and Tempe, Gilbert... by MrWin2kMan · · Score: 1

    As an IT worker refugee from LA and San Diego, I can tell you I moved out here and not only immediately made more money than I had been in San Diego, I could afford to live here. I'm a bigger fish in a smaller pond. The tech sector is one area that has been pretty steady through all the downturn. Ebay, Paypal, Expedia, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citibank all have major data center operations here. There are hundreds of Fortune 1000 companies with IT presence here. It's not just Intel with yet another new Fab in Chandler every couple of years. It may be hot as Hades, but land is cheap, power is cheap, connectivity is plentiful, the cost of living is low and the standard of living is high. I miss the ocean, but we have lots of beach.

    --
    Nothing to see here but us trolls...move along...
  221. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Airzona is doing what other countries do. ENFORCING immigration polices.

    No, you're not.

    Now if I want to your country (probably Australia, UK, or India) and came illegally you bet my ass I would be arrested and the employer fined and deported.

    Now, read your last clause. Federal law requires employers to check that their employees are legally able to work in the US. I've been asked to prove that for several jobs now (I usually bring my passport). It's one of those cases where I have to produce papers even though I'm a US citizen.

    The reason you're getting swarms of illegal immigrants is because they can find jobs. They may seem bad to you, but they're what brings them here and allows them to stay here. Cut off the jobs and you drastically reduce the immigrant problem. That's what you're failing to do.

    If Sheriff Joe would throw people who hire illegal immigrants into Tent City to await trial, the jobs would dry up and the immigrants would have to go home.

    Of course, this would require that your law enforcement authorities actually find what everybody knows is going on, and arrest and prosecute US citizens who are guilty of nothing other than flagrant violation of the law (many of whom are likely well-known and well-off members of the community), so that may be unpopular. It will also raise prices for everything the illegals had been doing, since it will be necessary to hire US citizens who demand at least minimum wage and have effective legal recourse against the worst abuses, but that's at least a large part of the solution.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  222. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

    To be fair, SB1070 (the discriminatory law that made all the headlines) was authored by Russell Pearce that the citizens later impeached. He was thrown out of office by the people of his hometown. He's trying to get elected again. If he makes it, feel free to trash Arizona.

    --

    "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  223. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

    Actually federal law already requires ALL immigrants to register and carry some form of documentation at all times, legal or otherwise. A green card will suffice.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1304
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1306

    So the "papers please" argument already applies nationwide.

    You miss the point. Are US citizens required to carry documentation at all times? What happens when you ask for proof of citizenship from someone who actually is a citizen and is therefore not required to carry such proof?

    I am against illegal immigration. I'm also against being asked to provide proof for such a thing while walking down the street. If I'm applying for a job, yes, you should be verifying I'm allowed to work. If I'm applying for a government position that requires citizenship, you should be verifying I'm a citizen. If a cop thinks that I might not be American because of a hunch, he can go fuck himself. He doesn't have the right to stop me because he thinks my tan is genetic.

  224. As long as it's not where I live by drwho · · Score: 1

    RT 128 in Massachusetts had the tech boom before Silicon Valley really took off and surpassed it. Yet, enough of that early success lives on and keep real estate prices high. But people in Massachusetts realized that not all growth was good, and started to put limits on development back in the 70s. Thus, we still have a decent culture around in much of the area. The quality of life is considered far better in Massachusetts than in Silicon valley by many. Sure, there's not as many sunny days, but there's trees, snow, far lass pollution, open spaces (which are not deserts), and so forth. If you want a bit more freedom, less taxes, and less services, then go a few miles further north into New Hampshire and you've got it. But I am not proclaiming the glory of Massachusetts over Silicon Valley - housing prices are still high here, and taxes too. But some Yankees decided they'd like to retain the character of the place and set limits. This is sort of in line with what others have said, that there can not by another Silicon Valley. Instead of trying to duplicate SV, cities should try out their own formula for a successful economy and high quality of living. Focus on what the area can do best. In Mass, it is the deep roots of old money and old Universities. Other places may have sun and fun, others quiet and family-centered, and so forth. Phoenix sounds great if you like high temperatures, lots of sun, room to spread out, can speak Spanish, like pollution, prefer not to have stores within walking distance, etc. I am sure that's fine for many people but it just would never, ever do for me. Seattle, Halifax, Montreal, Vancouver, Dublin all might work for me. But none of them are going to be the 'next Silicon Valley'.

  225. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    He's not denying it, he's anonymously calling you stupid for pointing out the obvious fact that he knows is true, and is too chickenshit to deal with in any other way than denials.

    He's and AC for a reason.

  226. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    About half the states have stop and identify laws, so I don't know what delusion (or state) you are living under, when you say that you have some sort of right to not be approached by a law officer.

    It's illegal to lie to the police. If you are questioned, and they suspect you've lied about your immigration status, what then ? Just let them go ?

    Let's be honest here; the goal of the pro illegal immigration people is to prevent by any means they can ANY kind of intervention, ANY kind of law enforcement towards people here illegally.

    Their goal is to try to con stupid people, like yourself, into believing that you have some sort of immunity to having to interact with law enforcement people. You don't. If an officer wants to question you, if he finds something vague about you suspicious, he can stop you and ask you questions, PERIOD.

    And you go ahead and think that an officer cares that you think he can go fuck himself, what are you, twelve years old ?

    Come back in 15 years, sonny, when you have some real life experiences under your belt, you're an idiot.

  227. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep hearing that stupid argument. "suspect of being illegal" is no different than any other probable cause argument! "suspect of carrying illegal substances", "suspected of lying about your identity", "suspected of beating your wife", "suspected of robbing a bank", "suspected of being here illegally". They all use the same psychology research to follow up on, and all follow the same lawful requirement: probable cause.

    None of your counter-examples have anything to do with how a person looks. GP is stating that being brown is enough to be suspected of being an illegal, which means if you are a Hispanic US citizen, unlike white US citizens in the same town, you MUST carry identification or risk being detained as an illegal.

  228. Phoenix? probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up in phoenix, went to school there, went to work for Motorola Government Electronics (now General Dynamics) and started my own computer store back in the early days of personal computers, my business was gutted by a New CompUSA on one side and a best buy on the other, so I ended up becoming just a stopping point for educational purposes before the potential customer bought there new pc from the big box store. Watched all the quirky things I liked so much about Phoenix disapear to be replaced by corporate boringness. I sincererly doubt Phoenix will become a replacement for silicon valley. As pointed out by others its just too hot most of the year and that leads to people not thinking well. I truely believe humans were not meant to function in plus 100 degree temperature. Other factors of course don't make things any better, but the heat was why I finally left the valley.
    If there could be a better place I'd put my money on the Pacific Northwest, but then I've seen other Arizonian transplants literiately not able to deal with 45 - 50 days of rain and no sunshine, so its pretty much one extreme or the other, in short very difficult if not impossible to recreate or replace Silicon Valley,if I could afford to live there I'd consider it in a heartbeat.

  229. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Yakasha · · Score: 1

    GP is stating that being brown is enough to be suspected of being an illegal, which means if you are a Hispanic US citizen, unlike white US citizens in the same town, you MUST carry identification or risk being detained as an illegal.

    Not even sure why I'm responding... The GP's claim was:

    The police are empowered to ask for "papers, please" of anyone that they "suspect of being illegal". Which practically means, anyone mocha colored.

    Which is absolutely, ignorantly, and stupidly false. AZ's law regarding the subject requires the exact same probable cause as demanding a person stopped on the street to empty their pockets, or wanting to enter a home to speak to a person's wife, or detaining a person to verify their identity, or any other attempt to obtain evidence or detain somebody without a warrant. Some cops might do so based on how you look: blacks near a bank, oh must have robbed it; redneck in a tank-top, he must have beat his wife, but that in no way changes what the law requires or indicates how other officers will apply it.

    A cop is not allowed to demand you empty your pockets, or check your papers, or do anything other than ask your name, age, and address (without requiring documentation to prove it except in a few limited municipalities), unless they have other reasons to believe that you have contraband in your pocket, or are here illegally, or witnessed you speeding, or some other probable cause argument to do so. If they demand your papers without probable cause they violate the law just as if they randomly demanded somebody empty their pockets.

  230. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have family that works for mcso... Tents is only for sentanced inmates.

  231. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

    About half the states have stop and identify laws, so I don't know what delusion (or state) you are living under, when you say that you have some sort of right to not be approached by a law officer.

    South Carolina, where we still believe in constitutional rights. And I've never said I have a right to not be approached by a law officer, I said I have the right to not talk to him or show him any identification. And I do.

    Their goal is to try to con stupid people, like yourself, into believing that you have some sort of immunity to having to interact with law enforcement people. You don't. If an officer wants to question you, if he finds something vague about you suspicious, he can stop you and ask you questions, PERIOD.

    An officer can stop and ask you questions at any time. You may also decline to answer at any time. You may also ask him questions such as, "am I free to go?". If he chooses to detain you, he has the right to do that. You still have the right to not answer any questions, even if you are arrested (and the officer is required by law to inform you of this right if he chooses to arrest you). If you are detained, you will be required to identify yourself (or you may be required to identify yourself by stating your name if you are not detained in certain states with stop and identify statues, but you're not required to provide them written identification). You can also sue the crap out of the department if you believe he had insufficient reason to arrest you.

    Finally, even if we did live in the police state you describe, I don't see why you would accept it, instead of working to change it.

    Come back in 15 years, sonny, when you have some real life experiences under your belt, you're an idiot.

    Being called an idiot by someone like you is an honor, good sir. Some role models you choose to emulate, but there are also those that simply provide you with a reference for the kind of man you don't wish to become.

  232. Re:Arizona? No Thanks by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    "Finally, even if we did live in the police state you describe, I don't see why you would accept it, instead of working to change it."

    You're an idiot because you live in NC and somehow believe that you don't already live in a police state.

    " And I've never said I have a right to not be approached by a law officer, I said I have the right to not talk to him or show him any identification."

    You're an idiot because in the real world you may have the right not to talk to an officer, but go ahead and don't say anything and see how far THAT will get you. You'll be arrested on suspicion on the spot, no law enforcement officer is going to construe your refusal to speak at all as anything but obstruction.

    It's idiotic to claim you have a right NOT to TALK to an officer, and then go on and on about all the things you HAVE to SAY to him to be allowed to go on your way.

    So far as role models go, if you're on slahdot looking for them, you're even more of an idiot that I thought you were initially. Again, come back in 15 years when you actually have a little real world experience and have actually interacted with law enforcement sufficiently to HAVE a relevant opinion.

    And don't delude yourself into thinking that SC is some sort of bastion of constitutional rights, that's the most idiotic thing you've written yet.