Slashdot Mirror


Alcoholism Vaccine Makes Alcohol Intolerable To Drinkers

Hugh Pickens writes "Ariel Schwartz reports that researchers are working on an alcoholism vaccine that makes alcohol intolerable to anyone who drinks it. The vaccine builds on what happens naturally in certain people — about 20% of the Japanese, Chinese, and Korean population — with an alcohol intolerance mutation. Normally, the liver breaks down alcohol into an enzyme that's transformed into the compound acetaldehyde (responsible for that nasty hangover feeling), which in turn is degraded into another enzyme. The acetaldehyde doesn't usually have time to build up before it's broken down. But people with the alcohol intolerance mutation lack the ability to produce that second enzyme; acetaldehyde accumulates, and they feel terrible. Dr. Juan Asenjo and his colleagues have come up with a way to stop the synthesis of that second enzyme via a vaccine, mimicking the mutation that sometimes happens naturally. 'People have this mutation all over the world. It's like how some people can't drink milk,' says Asenjo. Addressing the physiological part of alcohol addiction is just one piece of the battle. Addictive tendencies could very well manifest in other ways; instead of alcohol, perhaps former addicts will move on to cigarettes. Asenjo admits as much: 'Addiction is a psychological disease, a social disease. Obviously this is only the biological part of it.'"

350 comments

  1. I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, no alcohol? Shot as in vaccine? Fuck that.

    1. Re:I'll take a shot... by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Yea they need to be working it in reverse, make a vaccine to prevent hangovers.
      They wouldn't even need scientific grants, the liquor industry alone would be happy to foot the bill.

    2. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      A completely natural vaccine to prevent hangovers already exists. It's called water. After a long night of drinking enough booze that you know you'll end up with a hangover, go to sleep with a glass or bottle of water by your side. Most of the effects--especially the nastier ones--of a hangover are actually the effects of dehydration. You can drastically reduce its effects or even prevent having one completely by drinking enough water throughout the night. Depending on how much you drank and how dehydrated you get, having multiple bottles at easy reach can be more convenient.

    3. Re:I'll take a shot... by firex726 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just FYI a quick trip to Wiki might educate you on that. Don't assume stuff and pass it off as scientific fact.
      It's not been conclusively shown it is dehydration. It is but one of several leading theories:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangover

      > Hypoglycemia, dehydration, acetaldehyde intoxication, and glutamine rebound are all theorized causes of hangover symptoms.

      You can read more in the cited sources of the article.

    4. Re:I'll take a shot... by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      As someone who used to have hangovers quite frequently in his younger days, I can assure you that they're more than dehydration. I drank plenty of water and fluids (both before and fact the fact) and still felt like ass the next day.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    5. Re:I'll take a shot... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2

      Right or wrong, drinking a bunch of water before bed seems to prevent hangovers for me.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    6. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Don't assume stuff and pass it off as scientific fact.

      And everything on wikipedia is scientific fact?

    7. Re:I'll take a shot... by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of the actual works I've seen (which are more reliable than wikipedia) have said that hangovers symptoms have been demonstrated to be linked to several of those factors, but that dehydration is by far the most significant overall (though others may be more significant in particular individuals, depending on individual sensitivities and other conditions.)

    8. Re:I'll take a shot... by icebike · · Score: 4, Funny

      I drank plenty of water and fluids (both before and fact the fact)

      Last night too, I see.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:I'll take a shot... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I learned from a very... experienced coworker. Chase every drink, beer or otherwise, with a pint of water. You'll piss like a racehorse, but you'll have a seriously reduced hangover.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of years ago I saw a blog by a grad student, he had a bunch of really interesting posts on drugs and neurochemistry. One day he had a post up that talked about the neurochemical effects of booze. How booze gets you high, what you like, what you don't like (motor control, cns depression and hangover). Also mentioned a couple of drugs that produce the same effects as booze, etc without the motor control issues, cns depression, or hangover. Two days later the blog was gone.

      GHB produces many of the same effects as booze. But no hangover. And of course society is terrified of it.

    11. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Most of the actual works I've seen (which are more reliable than wikipedia) have said that hangovers symptoms have been demonstrated to be linked to several of those factors, but that dehydration is by far the most significant overall (though others may be more significant in particular individuals, depending on individual sensitivities and other conditions.)

      This strongly mimics my own experiences. Sure, there is probably something else contributing to your hangover, but whatever it is, it doesn't seem to matter much. Drink enough water and the hangover as a whole will correct itself rapidly. The few minor "remaining" symptoms that linger after re-hydrating yourself are not too bad in my experience, and those are probably caused by other things... but once I've got the water taken care of the rest of the effects quickly diminish.

    12. Re:I'll take a shot... by tibit · · Score: 1

      One word: bullshit.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    13. Re:I'll take a shot... by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's 100% due to dehydration. Drinking lots of water probably helps to dilute and flush the metabolites that cause hangovers out of your system faster. Also, fusel oils (very common in brown spirits like whiskey and far more rare in clear spirits like vodka) can make hangovers worse.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    14. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Two words: Try it. Works for me, every time. For the several years that I have been doing it.

    15. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      In either case, the solution is obvious... drink plenty of water. I agree that there are probably other contributing factors, but I think dehydration is the big one. By the time I've re-hydrated myself, any remaining effects never last much longer. I am primarily limited to beer, though--both craft beer of all styles and typical macro lagers. I think you're probably right in that it would probably be more difficult to get rid of a hangover involving very large amounts of, for example, whiskey... lots of higher alcohols, not to mention a shitload more alcohol to begin with (assuming you do shots). Some of my worst and longest-lasting hangovers were whiskey-related.

    16. Re:I'll take a shot... by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, fusel oils (very common in brown spirits like whiskey and far more rare in clear spirits like vodka) can make hangovers worse.

      The very worse hangover I ever had was when I decided to take a sculpture class in college. One of the advantages was learning to weld, and I discovered that if you had a bad hangover and took a cutting torch, turned on the oxygen and breathed deeply the hangover was gone in less than five minutes.

      Well, one morning I was so hung over I was still staggering. I went to do my hangover remedy... and you guessed it, I turned the wrong knob. That gave me the mother of all hangovers! The oxygen helped a little after I stopped puking. I felt better after the instructor smoked a joint with me (this was back in the 70s, also known as the "stone" age).

      The best hangover remedy won't work any more unless you raise your own chickens, and that's eggnog. Three raw egg yolks in a glass, mixed with milk and a generous amount of sugar and perhaps nutmeg. The yolk of a raw egg contains an enzyme that speeds the breakdown (and come to think of it, might just be an antidote to the vaccine as well). The trouble is that heat, including pasteurization, kills the enzyme. So grocery store eggnog won't work, you need raw yolks, and one of three raw commercial eggs has salmonella. Yeah, no hangover this morning but tomorrow you'll feel worse from the cramps and runs and maybe even be in the hospital.

      If you're raising chickens it works well.

    17. Re:I'll take a shot... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Just because it works for you doesn't make it not bullshit. It's bullshit because it doesn't work for a majority of people.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    18. Re:I'll take a shot... by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      That was hilarious! Where are the moderators?

    19. Re:I'll take a shot... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      For lightweight drinking this might be true. When you start drinking heavily, you realize that dehydration is just one component of a hangover.

    20. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I realize it may not work for everyone since none of our bodies are exactly the same. But you're saying that even if it does work for me (and undoubtedly others), then it's still bullshit? Do you even know what the word bullshit means? Fact does not equal bullshit. And the fact is, in my own personal experience, water does provide the ability to minimize or eliminate the effects of a hangover after getting drunk.

      Would you also call it "bullshit" if I said that you could die of water intoxication? Hey, after all, it's not an easy accomplishment to achieve, and very few people manage to do it. It must be bullshit!

    21. Re:I'll take a shot... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      So grocery store eggnog won't work, you need raw yolks, and one of three raw commercial eggs has salmonella.

      Something like half of chicken growers vaccinate their chickens against salmonella. If you can't have a coop, do some research and buy your eggs from a farm that vaccinates against it.

      It's not 100%, but then neither is having your own chickens.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    22. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      So maybe the flaw in my thinking is that I'm assuming that I'm talking to people who drink heavily on occasion (like weekends), instead of raging alcoholics? Sounds like a plausible misunderstanding and one that would change whether simple re-hydration would work well or not.

    23. Re:I'll take a shot... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      This is about two things: dilution in stomach before it enters the bloodstream, slowing the absorption through stomach until it enters intestines and in blood and volume, less room in stomach for alcohol before stomach starts to tell your brain it's full and you should cut down on consumption.

      Same thing is recommended for those on diet. When you are dieting and feel hungry, don't eat. Instead, drink water until you fill your stomach. The feeling of fullness removes (most of the) desire to eat.

    24. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Don't drink on an empty stomache.

      2. Don't mix alcohol with any dairy products.

      3. Try hard liquor, instead of beer and mixed drinks. Most flavorings and additives make hangovers worse.

      4. Drink slow more, or drink fast less. It takes time for the alcohol to be absorbed (it's not instantaneous; in my experience, it's about a quarter hour for the full effects). If you drink too fast then you're probably over-doing the amount you meant to drink, and it's catching up to you (possibly after you've gone to sleep).

      5. Brush your teeth before sleeping.

      6. Drink a bunch of water before going to sleep. Put some salt in the water (if you're thinking "Mmm pretzels", you'll know if you need salt).

      0. Drink some alcohol the next morning (approx. half a beer). That'll end the hangover faster than anything else, coincidentally. If it doesn't, it might indicate you have some kind of liver, kidney, or other health problem.

      I did some tests when I was first old enough to acquire alcohol. One of the simple things I wanted to know is how much I could drink before getting smashed. I also wanted to know if the stuff I'd heard about alcohol changing people's personalities was true. I found I could easily drink a six-pack an hour, before getting bored. And, basically no. Unless someone might also do it sober, drinking wont bestow any personality defying behavior. It can only loosen a person up, slow them down, and make them dumber. If I could grab her chest while drunk, I could do it sober (I just wouldn't have a convenient excuse; which is what a lot of people really use alcohol for, being shameless bastards).

    25. Re:I'll take a shot... by zephvark · · Score: 1

      you need raw yolks, and one of three raw commercial eggs has salmonella.

      I'm not sure what country you're living in? In the U.S., only one in 20,000 eggs contains salmonella. http://www.cdc.gov/nczved/divisions/dfbmd/diseases/salmonella_enteritidis/

    26. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sort of lucky but I always get very thirsty when drinking alcohol and my body screams that I need to drink some water, so I do in the same way you say.
      I have been quite drunk in my live, but I have never had a hangover.

      I also get really thirsty from ice cream.

    27. Re:I'll take a shot... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Diabetes?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will kill the first politician, judge, prostitutor who mandates this permanent crippling disease be forced on anyone.

    29. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do your own research and learn that there is no vaccine effective against the strains of salmonella that make you sick. The vaccination they do is Europe is simply a dog-and-pony-show with no real benefit.

    30. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      3. Try hard liquor, instead of beer and mixed drinks.

      Drinking liquor instead of beer is a sure-fire way to make any potential hangover much worse in my experience... but, as you pointed out, it all has to do with the pace of your drinking for the most part.

      0. Drink some alcohol the next morning (approx. half a beer). That'll end the hangover faster than anything else, coincidentally.

      As long as you don't have such a bad hangover that even the thought of drinking more alcohol doesn't gag you. Which, again, typically only happens to me with liquor, not beer... but still, you bring up a good point, drinking a bit more when you get up can work amazingly well. The theory is, your body is going through a mild withdrawal after a long night of drinking, so a little alcohol can fix you right up.

      Some of the other things you mentioned seemed more like good ways to prevent getting sick and puking (not drinking on an empty stomach) while drunk than ways to prevent a hangover the day after, and a couple of the others didn't make any sense whatsoever (I don't see how dental hygiene has anything to do with a hangover).

    31. Re:I'll take a shot... by wisty · · Score: 1

      Probably more if you raise your own.

    32. Re:I'll take a shot... by flaming+error · · Score: 1
      "Do you even know what the word bullshit means?"

      No, so I looked it up in the Online Etymology Dictionary

      Among the several possible meanings and etymologies of bull is this:

      bull (n.3) "false talk, fraud," Middle English, apparently from Old French bole "deception, trick, scheming, intrigue," and perhaps connected to modern Icelandic bull "nonsense." There also was a verb bull meaning "to mock, cheat," which dates from 1530s.

      And among other things,

      shit (v.) Extensive slang usage; verb meaning "to lie, to tease" is from 1934; that of "to disrespect" is from 1903

      Fox News would be especially intrigued by the etymological link between shit and science.

      shit (v.) Old English scitan, from Proto-Germanic *skit-, from PIE *skheid- "split, divide, separate." Related to shed (v.) on the notion of "separation" from the body (cf. Latin excrementum, from excernere "to separate"). It is thus a cousin to science and conscience.

      Put them both together and:

      bullshit (n.) "eloquent and insincere rhetoric," 1915, American English slang; see bull (n.1) + shit (n.), probably because it smells. But bull in the sense of "trivial or false statements" (1914), which usually is associated with this, might be a continuation of Middle English bull "false talk, fraud" (see bull (n.3)).

      So all this time you thought it was just excrement, and it turns out to be a rather clever double entendre.

      And now we all know what bullshit means.

    33. Re:I'll take a shot... by Yomers · · Score: 1

      I usually eat 2-3 raw eggs after heavy drinking before sleep - it seems to help. I guess salmonella just can not survive harsh conditions of 40% alcohol inside me and dies.

    34. Re:I'll take a shot... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      So all this time you thought it was just excrement, and it turns out to be a rather clever double entendre.

      And now we all know what bullshit means.

      Nice one, genius, but the following is pretty much the definition of bullshit that I use:
      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bullshit?s=t

      Such things as "nonsense, lies, or exaggeration"... not fecal matter from a bull's rectum. In fact, assuming I were to actually ever talk about the animal excrement, I would probably type it as two words with a space.

      Nice way to take what I said and turn it way the fuck around to make it seem as if I was actually talking about something else entirely--you win the Unofficial Slashdot Trolling Asshole award. Anyone want to guess what an asshole is? Hint: It's not the part an animal's ass (a bull, donkey, human or whatever) that shit comes out of. Have fun.

    35. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I proved this shit once by getting moderately drunk (enough to feel a goodly hangover the next day) and downing an entire Gatorade and eating a small meal before going to bed. Still a hangover. Just slightly less intense as if I wouldn't have drank an entire sports drink and eaten a meal beforehand. I know some of it has to do with stress chemicals being emitted from your gut because that alcohol is a general irritant..since nerves down there are 'weird' to say the least, it manifests as general body pains, nausea, and the stress chemicals can cause headaches too.

      Notice you always feel quite a bit better after taking a huge dump? I think staying hydrated is only part of the equation.

    36. Re:I'll take a shot... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, apparently my info was 25 years out of date. It was the eighties when I saw the one in three, and the link says there was a salmonella outbreak at that time.

    37. Re:I'll take a shot... by grandpastackhouse · · Score: 1

      When you are dieting and feel hungry, don't eat. Instead, drink water until you fill your stomach. The feeling of fullness removes (most of the) desire to eat.

      This is a bad idea to do regularly, and is a classic behavior of someone with an eating disorder. Eat healthy food (e.g. vegetables) instead of a burger and fries when you feel hungry.

    38. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A useful anecdote. It reinforces the summary's assertion that acetylaldehyde is a cause of hangovers.

    39. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also has a toxic dosage that's within about 10% (from memory) of an active dose and is incredibly sensitive to liver function - which means that even after you manage to work out what a effective dose is, for you, it will probably vary.

      While an overdose isn't necessarily directly harmful, it leaves you in a kind of stupor or semi-coma. You'll recover without ill effect so long as you are kept safe and someone keeps an eye on you. Sans such care you are vulnerable - which is why society quite rightly recognises the potential harm it can cause.

      Alcohol will knock you out as well, but it has a far more graceful 'failure mode' and the difference between active- and over- dosage is large enough that you and the people around you can tell when you are approaching the point of unconsciousness.

      There are far safer drugs than either alcohol or GHB that produce euphoria, disinhibition and the like with lower toxicities and much more manageable side effects and less harmful overdose problems.

    40. Re:I'll take a shot... by aug24 · · Score: 1

      That theory (alcohol in the morning for 'withdrawal') is completely wrong. The chemistry is well known.

      Hangovers are partially caused by dehydrogenation of alcohols leading to poisonous chemicals. Ethyl alcohol turns to acetaldehyde, but we can deal with this one (thank you evolution).

      Methyl alcohol (wood alcohol impurities, present in most drinks to greater or lesser degree) turns to formaldehyde. This is very bad for you and makes you feel like hell. The process of creating formaldehyde is linear (because the total present must be limited due to toxicity), not power based, so there is never too much made unless the amount of methyl alcohol is even more toxic.

      However, the conversion process is negatively catalysed (slowed down) in the presence of ethyl alcohol. So, a little beer can reduce the amount present enough to effectively remove the hangover.

      Sorry about too many brackets (not really sorry).

      Just.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    41. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably the last we'll hear of it, since the developers will mysteriously disappear at the hands of alcohol producers... This vaccines is to the alcohol industry what electric cars are to the oil industry.

    42. Re:I'll take a shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you can get mobile IV drips in Vegas to recover and keep you gambling...

  2. Underestimating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What needing a drink is really like...

    1. Re:Underestimating by evilbessie · · Score: 2

      Hmm, if you suffered from it you would probably think differently. Trust me.

    2. Re:Underestimating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what? The vaccine? Have you had it?

    3. Re:Underestimating by afeeney · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have either that mutation or some other factor that makes drinking even a tiny amount of alcohol a horrible experience. I can handle about a teaspoonful of wine or a quarter cup of beer, but any more than that and I feel nauseated and dizzy with a terrible headache and grogginess. It developed about the time I hit 30 and the same thing happened with my mother at around age 35, so I assume that it's a genetic factor that either gets triggered with age or some environmental factor.

      I was always a light drinker and never felt emotionally or physiologically dependent upon it, so my experience is NOTHING like an alcoholic's or somebody whose entirely social life is dependent upon drinking, but I gave up drinking immediately once it developed. Didn't matter that I'd just started being able to appreciate the good stuff and really enjoy it, I dropped it completely.

      Can't say how it would work for an alcoholic, but I'd imagine it'd be very effective on somebody who is concerned about becoming one.

    4. Re:Underestimating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it also happens when you skip breakfast or lunch you may want to see a doctor... adult diabetes is fairly common

    5. Re:Underestimating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up drinking when I developed gout in my mid-30s. It was either that or look like der Captain from the Katzenjammer Kids.

    6. Re:Underestimating by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, the AC has a point. You're not going to cure an alcoholic with this and you might even kill hi with it. I know quite a few alkies, both practicing and reformed, and few with a bad addiction ever stop until they hit rock bottom. Even after an alcoholic reforms, relapse isn't only possible but usually likely. And an alcoholic will literally drink himself to death, either from overdose or cirrhosis. This vaccine would be extremely dangerous, although if someone's liver is about to explode* this vaccine may well save their life.

      * Not literally, of course, but when they get bad their belly does look like it will explode, and they are in misery.

    7. Re:Underestimating by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Can't say how it would work for an alcoholic, but I'd imagine it'd be very effective on somebody who is concerned about becoming one.

      Not likely to work on alcoholics. When an alcoholic drinks, they are already ignoring the consequences of their actions.

    8. Re:Underestimating by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You re underestimating what a desire to stop drinking is really like.

      I'm saying this as a sober alcoholic.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    9. Re:Underestimating by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      A vaccine by definition is something that prevents developing a disease. I think this invention might be useful. Looking back I don't see any benefits of my drinking. Baking - a horse of octarine.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    10. Re:Underestimating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that I also suffer from this. Even one beer is a very unpleasant experience the next day. Even before it went full-blown a little before age 30, I found that just a couple of beers led to big headaches.

    11. Re:Underestimating by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A vaccine by definition is something that prevents developing a disease.

      True, but in this case I think they're twisting the definition somewhat. It's been shown that drinking in moderation has benefits to one's health, especially wine, but the key is moderation. It's also a social lubricant. I don't think I'd want a flu shot if it took away my sense of taste.

    12. Re:Underestimating by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1
      I agree, but if you're a recovering alcoholic (i.e. no longer capable of moderation) and want to stay sober, this vaccine is an FSMsend.

      It's also a social lubricant.

      In moderation - yes, but even then it raises the risk of violence. As a sober alcoholic I have been to shindigs with ethanol and unfortunately even the (just) tipsy persons make me uncomfortable. Not because of craving, that's no longer a problem, but with their altered behaviour. I infinitely prefer baked people.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    13. Re:Underestimating by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It would be most dangerous to a recovering alcoholic. A hangover is actually physical withdrawal, and addicts often relapse. When they do, they usually relapse hard. Now, if their liver is almost gone this could save their life.

    14. Re:Underestimating by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      It would be most dangerous to a recovering alcoholic.

      Never mind my own experience and medical background which says relapse is in overwhelming majority a gradual process, which is also supported by the earlier attempts at aversion therapies with disulfiram (whose effect can be overcome, with relentlessness). You're correct. Good day.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  3. Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is one vaccine some people would want to avoid. Imagine a winelover accidentally getting stuck with one and having their passion ruined for life.

    1. Re:Scary idea by clonan · · Score: 1

      Worst case it would be ruined for 6 months.

    2. Re:Scary idea by green1 · · Score: 2

      I seriously doubt there is a widespread problem with anyone getting any vaccines accidentally.

    3. Re:Scary idea by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      That's how I got my last tetanus vaccination, I stepped on a rusty nail and a syringe with the vaccination.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    4. Re:Scary idea by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Without vigilance, there might be a widespread problem with people getting these vaccines against their will.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you often get flu shots by accident? How the fuck does it ever happen?

    6. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would happen if you step on a rusty syringe with the vaccination?

    7. Re:Scary idea by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure most of slashdot would want to avoid the GNRH vaccine used with pigs to prevent boar taint.

    8. Re:Scary idea by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Worst case it would be ruined for 6 months.

      When you read TFA, is says:

      With one dose of the vaccine, the mice’s drinking habits diminish by 50% for 30 days.

      That would suggest the effect is far shorter than 6 months, and the vaccine far less effective than most here seem to think.
      Chances are, the occasional, small. glass of wine wouldn't even affect most people.

      If the effect only lasts for 30 days, (or, giving the benefit of the doubt, 6 months), the true alcoholic would find excuses
      to miss that second shot.

      As for accidentally getting this shot, don't discount the possibility of a court order, or at the very least, a court
      ordered choice, the shot or jail. A shot with this short period of efficacy probably isn't likely to be successful
      in either combating alcoholism or preventing drinking, simply because it appears to be so short acting.

      In fact, one wonders if it really qualifies as a vaccine. One of the hallmarks of a vaccine according to wiki is: "[an agent that] stimulates the body's immune system to recognize the agent as foreign, destroy it, and "remember" it, so that the immune system can more easily recognize and destroy any of these microorganisms that it later encounters."

      This treatment seems merely to be an agent that suppress the production of a naturally occurring bodily enzyme, but only while the agent is present in quantity sufficient to trigger the suppression. It seems to have no lasting effect.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:Scary idea by icebike · · Score: 2

      Without vigilance, there might be a widespread problem with people getting these vaccines against their will.

      I could easily see it being court mandated, especially upon a DWI conviction. The effect seems to be short lived (30 days for mice), so unless major improvements in longevity of the effect, it would seem to be no more permanent than a jail sentence, but a lot less costly.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Box of singles fell out of a fedex truck on the 5 north a couple years ago while I was driving behind it. Smashed through my windshield and 7 of them stuck.
      Worst part, they tried to bill my insurance!

    11. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stepped on the nail accidentally, I suppose, not the syringe. And the nail probably didn't contain the vaccine.

      So no, you didn't get the vaccine accidentally, you got it on purpose.

    12. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take the shot once a month for 6 months or have your license suspended assuming that is a first DUI offense and there were no injuries or automobile accidents involved.

    13. Re:Scary idea by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      We already have that, it is call a mortgage payment.

    14. Re:Scary idea by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      There is a pill that does the same thing, and it has been around for a very long time now. The only difference I see is that the difference is irrevocable.

      What the article doesn't mention, though, is that the gene responsible for this (which is also present in many Native Americans, by the way) has a strong positive correlation with alcoholism. Populations that have a high incidence of this mutation also tend to have MORE alcoholics.

    15. Re:Scary idea by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Having a lasting effect would be highly inadvisable. This is about suppressing one of the natural defense mechanisms of the body against certain type of toxin. The goal is not to actually disable this defense mechanism permanently, but to cause significant discomfort for the period of alcoholic trying to kick his habit. It's essentially an extra psychological factor that introduces "alcohol makes me sick" illusion to help combat the psychological aspect of dependency. After that, defense mechanism should restore itself ASAP.

      This is why critics are worried that addiction would move to another subject in these cases. Because this basically makes one addiction feel terrible, but addicts psychological make-up, one that enabled the addiction in the first place remains untreated. I suspect this vaccine will be mainly used in treatments which also provide counseling to help combat the psychological aspect of addiction.

    16. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about all of those closet prohibitionists who will now go to bars to surreptitiously slip the powdered form into people's drinks? Well, once it comes in powdered form...

    17. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's the only time I'd actually approve of such a measure.

    18. Re:Scary idea by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Without vigilance, there might be a widespread problem with people getting these vaccines against their will.

      Better than them drinking alcohol against their will, which is essentially what alcoholism amounts to.

    19. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but a lot less costly.

      Obviously you've never been on probation.

      You'd think that since they don't have to feed you, house you, or provide any security, probation wouldn't cost as much as being in jail. You would be wrong, you're going to pay anywhere from $10-30/day for "supervision fees" in any state in the US.

    20. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow if you're not joking that sounds pretty bad. Seems pretty unique though.

    21. Re:Scary idea by a_hanso · · Score: 1

      This is NOT a vaccine. This is a form of genetic mutilation based on some person's idea of ethics. In that sense, it's only a few notches above female circumcision.

    22. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you.. specially in countries where it is prohibited religious wise. It side effect could be that they mandate vaccination even in countries where they may not allow polio vaccine but this one.

      It may not make it popular but I support it for few sections of populations If it works. You cannot discount its positive impact on economically weaker section, for e.g. in India where I belong, who ruin their family, their health due to ill effect of alcoholism which account of majority of their income

    23. Re:Scary idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the true alcoholic would find excuses to miss that second shot.

      If they haven't had a drink for 30 days, the next 30 days are a lot easier.

      Source: me. I use antibuse to help control cravings.

  4. In other news... by crazyjj · · Score: 1, Troll

    Stocks in Irish, Scottish, and Russian companies unexpectedly soar.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scots aren't chronic alcoholics ... we can't afford it.

    2. Re:In other news... by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could, you're just too cheap.

    3. Re:In other news... by plover · · Score: 2

      A drunken Scot was on his bicycle pedaling unsteadily home after closing time, with his flask in his back pocket. His tire fell in a rut and he crashed into a wall. Dazed, he sat up and felt a wet trickle running down his thigh. He muttered a prayer, "dear God, I hope that's blood."

      --
      John
  5. Doubtful by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

    Most people despised their first taste of alcohol but many came back for seconds. Like most things, it depends.

    1. Re:Doubtful by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      Does anyone really drink alcohol for the taste? Take the effect away and most drinks are a lot like drinking piss with a mediciney aftertaste.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:Doubtful by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does anyone really drink alcohol for the taste? Take the effect away and most drinks are a lot like drinking piss with a mediciney aftertaste.

      Actually...yes many of us like the taste.

      When I was a little kid and I had my first taste of beer, I LOVED it.

      I love the taste of fine wines...great with meals. I love a good, single malt scotch, with maybe a splash of water or a couple ice cubes (ok purists, bite me, I like it chilled a bit).

      I like mixed drinks...I like the bitter tastes of a gin and tonic with fresh lime on a hot summer afternoon, I like a real daquiri (not that fucking over fruited strawberry frozen shit)....I like a good mojito.

      Yes, many of us do enjoy alcohol's flavor in its various forms and mixed with things. The fact that it makes you feel great is definitely a plus.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Doubtful by firex726 · · Score: 1

      I assume they do, why else would you order the expansive brand at a bar over the cheap shit? Especially if being mixed.

    4. Re:Doubtful by quantaman · · Score: 2

      They come to like the taste because they associate it with the feelings that come after.

      This would change the feelings that happens after drastically, I think it could be extremely effective.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone? Most humans enjoy the taste of at least one kind of alcoholic beverage. It's fairly common.

    6. Re:Doubtful by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      They come to like the taste because they associate it with the feelings that come after.

      Not necessarily. I tasted my first beer, I think at about age 12 or so, and I liked it the very first sip I had, and I had NO idea what the feelings would be...I didn't have enough to get buzzed, but I sure know I liked the taste of beer!

      I still do to this day....hell, nowdays, I brew my own!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Doubtful by neminem · · Score: 2

      There is booze that I would only drink if I wanted to get drunk, but there is definitely also booze that I would drink even if it was entirely nonalcoholic. You don't buy good scotch for the booze, you buy good scotch because it's good scotch.

    8. Re:Doubtful by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      It would discourage the common drinker, but would it discourage the alcoholic?

    9. Re:Doubtful by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone really drink alcohol for the taste? Take the effect away and most drinks are a lot like drinking piss with a mediciney aftertaste.

      Some alcoholic drinks are delicious. I happen to really really enjoy the taste of Guinness. Lots of fruity mixed drinks are fantastic. That said, I haven't had either in a while. In related news; it's Friday!

    10. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what its worth, if you want chilled scotch without the water they make things called "whisky stones." We picked some up at Target recently. You put the stones in the freezer and use like ice cubes.

    11. Re:Doubtful by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      Disliking the taste doesn't really equate to "feeling terrible", which is what thus purportedly would do.

    12. Re:Doubtful by Glothar · · Score: 2

      Dude, stop drinking the cheapest crap you can find.

      News flash: It tastes like crap.

      Good wine is very tasty. Microbrew beers (assuming you're from the US, considering you equate beer with piss) can be quite good.Tequila that you don't have to crawl on the floor to buy can be fairly smooth and good for flavoring meat. Vodka that doesn't come in a plastic bottle is more likely to have a clean, crisp flavor. I will often have wine/beer with a meal because it makes everything taste better. Of course, that requires that you not shop for the cheapest swill that some convenience store is willing to sell you. This shouldn't be shocking: Really cheap meat is crap. Cheap cheese isn't even cheese. Cheap bread has no flavor. Cheap fruit is often bland and far from ripe.

      Of course, that lesson isn't likely to make a difference. People buying cheap alcohol are usually alcoholics, college students, idiots, or some permutation of the three.

    13. Re:Doubtful by miltonw · · Score: 1

      ...like drinking piss with a mediciney aftertaste.

      Mmmmmm! American beer!

    14. Re:Doubtful by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Old joke: when asked if he wanted water in his whisky, the old sot barked "Water?! Fish fuck in water!"

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    15. Re:Doubtful by Altus · · Score: 3, Informative

      While the stones are great because they don't add some arbitrary amount of water, I do like a few drops in my scotch to open up the flavors a bit. This is particularly true with overproof scotches.

      For a lark, take a shot of water and add a few drops of scotch. I find that i can pick up on many flavors that get lost in the overall intensity of the drink. Also its like homeopathy for drinkers :-)

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    16. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone really drink alcohol for the taste?

      I like the taste of normal beer. Non-alcoholic beer tastes terrible. If you managed to take the physiological effect away or reduce it but keep the taste the same, many people will elevate you to godhood.

    17. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does anyone really drink alcohol for the taste? Take the effect away and most drinks are a lot like drinking piss with a mediciney aftertaste.

      I'm with you, man. The worst kind of drink I can think of is a cask-aged Belgian monestary trippel served with an apple, a block of cheese, and a hunk of bread fresh out of some stupid oven. Yuck!

      Does anyone really listen to music for the sound? Take the dancing people and the lights away, and most music is just annoying noise.

      Does anyone really look at paintings for the visuals? Take the frame and the museum away, and most paintings are just blotches of pigment on canvas.

      Does anyone really read books for the stories? Take the paper and binding away, and most books are just a bunch of words in too small a font (which are getting smaller and smaller every year, by the way).

      Yeah, pretty much all of our senses and all of the "pleasurable" reactions that are brains fool us into thinking we're having are such a load of crap. Kind of makes you wonder: What's the point anyway? I mean, could this sunset even be any more orange? Pffft.

    18. Re:Doubtful by sjames · · Score: 2

      You're drinking bad hooch then. There are actually GOOD tasting drinks out there, not all of them expensive.

      It's also worth noting that tastes change as we age.

    19. Re:Doubtful by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      While the stones are great because they don't add some arbitrary amount of water, I do like a few drops in my scotch to open up the flavors a bit. This is particularly true with overproof scotches.

      For a lark, take a shot of water and add a few drops of scotch. I find that i can pick up on many flavors that get lost in the overall intensity of the drink. Also its like homeopathy for drinkers :-)

      Homeopathy would be more like adding a few molecules of scotch per glass of water and then somehow claiming this is stronger than the full strength stuff straight from the bottle.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    20. Re:Doubtful by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I'll just add that they could be simply uneducated on the subject, and also what tastes good is highly subjective. I mentioned I like Guinness but several of my friends can't stand it. Many people love wine, and I really tried to pick it up a few months ago and just couldn't find a bottle that I actually enjoyed (admittedly I didn't buy any that were over $50/bottle).

    21. Re:Doubtful by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Does anyone really drink alcohol for the taste?

      Probably not, but few people drink straight alcohol and even fewer are around to discuss why. Many people, OTOH, drink beverages which happen to contain alcohol for the taste.

    22. Re:Doubtful by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you're referring to Budweiser, I will take this moment to remind you that it's now Belgian swill. We don't have to claim it as our own anymore!

    23. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're referring to Budweiser, I will take this moment to remind you that it's now Belgian swill. We don't have to claim it as our own anymore!

      Yea we do - only ownership of the company transferred to the Belgians.

      They still brew and bottle the stuff in 'Sain' Loo-ay", as always.

      - CanHasDIY

    24. Re:Doubtful by icebike · · Score: 1

      For an even greater effect, use hot water. Very effective at unmasking all the hidden flavors.
      You probably need more than a few drops of scotch.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    25. Re:Doubtful by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I'm with you. I like my scotch on the rocks, and I like to eat the little scotch-flavored ice cubes when I'm done with the drink. I don't care how angry that makes scotch lovers. My wife got me these rocks to chill the drink, but that's not for me.

      And a G&T is the definitive summer drink (for me).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    26. Re:Doubtful by xevioso · · Score: 3, Informative

      The U.S. has the best beer in the world. Period.

      http://www.finedininglovers.com/stories/brussels-beer-challenge-2012/

    27. Re:Doubtful by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't think you ever had any of the good stuff, then.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    28. Re:Doubtful by tibit · · Score: 1

      This, a hundred times! YES!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    29. Re:Doubtful by tibit · · Score: 1

      I'm similar, although I don't bother brewing my own -- making my own bread is enough :) It's very rare that I'd drink enough to feel any effects. Every couple of days I may have a bottle of beer, or a glass of wine. I like the taste, the buzz is not very pleasurable to me at all.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    30. Re:Doubtful by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I think so, at the end of the day alcoholism is a failure of willpower (not saying they have less willpower than non-alcoholics, just that the intoxication is too big a lure for them), they want the short term pleasure associated with being drunk. If they become sick while drinking that pleasurable objective is no attainable so the addiction should cease.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    31. Re:Doubtful by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

      I love the taste of fine wines...great with meals. I love a good, single malt scotch, with maybe a splash of water or a couple ice cubes (ok purists, bite me, I like it chilled a bit).

      As a purist who drinks my scotch neat, I say it's more important to know how you enjoy the drink and to enjoy it as such rather than trying to conform to other people's method of enjoyment.

      Unless you're mixing Diet Coke with 18 year single malt.

    32. Re:Doubtful by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Maybe... but mostly no, that's not what alcholism is. Alcoholism is a natural draw to alcohol, like a heightened instinct almost. If it was as easy as a test of willpower, why do people relapse after a few drinks into deep states of alcoholism. Don't get me wrong though, groups like AA take the whole willpower approach through accountability. That and not all alcoholics are created equal, the draw is a lot stronger in some, those would probably continue to drink despite the negative effects, but FDA testing pending, this is better than what the DOJ uses right now, which is pills.

    33. Re:Doubtful by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      Yes, many of us do enjoy alcohol's flavor in its various forms and mixed with things. The fact that it makes you feel great is definitely a plus.

      I'm all for allowing people to drink. I'm not some prohibitionist.

      I'm like the non-annoying vegetarians - I don't like the taste of alcohol, I don't like how it makes me feel, so I don't drink it. But I know there's lots of stuff other people like that I don't, and there's things I like that others don't.

      "To each his own". Have fun drinking. If you need a ride, call.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    34. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not what sort of dietary habits your sources of piss have, but I suspect they probably get many of their calories from alcohol if the drinks taste similar.

    35. Re:Doubtful by Tom · · Score: 1

      Apparently, yes. A friend of mine told me recently that she loves good whiskey, but hates getting drunk. If she could remove the alcohol, she'd do it.

      But the large picture is what you allege. Just look at sales numbers. Obviously, the cheapest alcohol sells most, not just by amounts but also by total revenue. Most people want to get drunk.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    36. Re:Doubtful by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Homeopathy would be more like adding a few molecules of scotch per glass of water and then somehow claiming this is stronger than the full strength stuff straight from the bottle.

      That wouldn't be homeopathy. That's hormesis. Homeopathic preparations (NOT medicines, because it's witchcraft) contain NO molecules of "active substance".

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    37. Re:Doubtful by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1
      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    38. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Homeopathy would be more like adding a few molecules of scotch per glass of water and then somehow claiming this will cure hangovers.

    39. Re:Doubtful by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Depends on the drink. Note, I don't actually drink any more. My ex-wife loved Southern Comfort as she thought it tasted like drinking a lolly. I used to love those pre-mixed vodka's with blueberry flavour etc in them as it was like having a soft drink (and were sort of lethal, because you never felt like you were drinking alcohol). I never did like the taste of beer though (and I'm allergic to it), that one is definitely an acquired taste (and yeah, lots of them do taste like what I would assume piss to taste like ... never actually drunk piss before). I liked Jaggermesiter because it tastes like cough medicine, and for some weird reason I used to love the taste of cough medicine when I was a kid ... actually, I still do. Scotch was my preferred drink for years, more specifically Johnny Walker red label. I'm allergic to wine as well, and never did like the taste of it. Long Island Iced Teas were great. There are many cocktails I never did get around to tasting when I was drinking, but people have assured me that many of them are quite delicious. Note, I stopped drinking by choice. I never was a big drinker. Alcohol doesn't affect me that much (ie can drink till the cows come home and not get drunk).

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  6. Professour Tournesol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tintin and the Picaros anyone?

  7. This is news? by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously? This is news?

    The EXACT SAME effect can be produced by feeding people shaggy mane mushrooms, (which are perfectly edible) due to the presence of a substance called Coprine.

    Coprine acts similarly to a well known medicinal substance called Disulfriram" that has been used to treat alcoholism via this mechanism for nearly 100 years!

    So, what you are telling me is that this doctor has essentially re-invented the wheel, and that this is news?

    1. Re:This is news? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But, the mushroom is not patentable. But this new "drug" will be patentable.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:This is news? by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a medicine, continuing treatment with ant-abuse is voluntary. As a vaccine, it's a life altering event.

      I'd be interested to see the first DUI case where a judge says "six months in the workhouse OR the vaccine."

      --
      John
    3. Re:This is news? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to see the first DUI case where a judge says "six months in the workhouse OR the vaccine."

      Well, first of all, get yourself a better lawyer...especially for first offense, you should likely get out of it with maybe probation.

      But if it came down to that...I'd take the 6 months.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:This is news? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      One lasts a couple of days. The other lasts 6 months.

      Slight difference.

    5. Re:This is news? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      Seriously? This is news?

      The EXACT SAME effect can be produced by feeding people shaggy mane mushrooms, (which are perfectly edible) due to the presence of a substance called Coprine.

      Coprine acts similarly to a well known medicinal substance called Disulfriram" that has been used to treat alcoholism via this mechanism for nearly 100 years!

      So, what you are telling me is that this doctor has essentially re-invented the wheel, and that this is news?

      If you read the article you linked (I just did - having not heard of it before) the most important part of this new product is that it's a (permanent?) vaccine rather than a pill. In studies cited by that Wikipedia article, Disulfriram was not effective primarily due to poor compliance by the patient- they stopped taking the pills so they could have a drink (basically). With a vaccine, the patient does not have the ability to stop and have a drink. I think that's a significant and worthwhile improvement.

      It reminds me of lap-band, or other weight loss surgery. Those surgeries punish the patient for poor diet compliance by causing nausea and vomiting. They do have a feature that this does not in that they also reward patient compliance (in the form of the patient feeling fuller longer with less food).

    6. Re:This is news? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Not permanent. It wears off after 6 months according to the article.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:This is news? by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      I think the major issue with Disulfriram (as even mentioned in wikipedia) is compliance. A vaccine removes that hurdle.

    8. Re:This is news? by plover · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just said I'd like to see it, not participate! I think it will make for some interesting ethics discussions.

      Imagine a drunk driver convicted of vehicular homicide being involuntarily sentenced to receive the vaccine. Is that ethical? Ask the victim's family if it's ethical to release him from prison without the vaccine?

      --
      John
    9. Re:This is news? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to see the first DUI case where a judge says "six months in the workhouse OR the vaccine."

      Well, first of all, get yourself a better lawyer...especially for first offense, you should likely get out of it with maybe probation.

      But if it came down to that...I'd take the 6 months.

      Don't get me wrong, I like a drink every now and then. However, given that choice I wouldn't even hesitate to take the shot. Seriously you'd take 6 months over not drinking? There's other tasty non alcoholic drinks out there, and a million other ways to get a buzz if you feel the need.

    10. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it be ethical to alter the brains of everyone who committed an offense such that it prevents them from doing the things that got them into prison to begin with? I don't think permanently altering anyone in that way is ethical, and it is far too exploitable.

    11. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Coprinopsis atramentaria, ink cap mushrooms?

    12. Re:This is news? by suutar · · Score: 1

      Dont necessarily have to sentence them to receive the vaccine involuntarily. Give them a choice, vaccine or no license (for driving drunk; if they actually damage someone or something in the process, make it 'no car'). Ideally, 6 months of vaccine time would break the habit. If not, a repeat offense can go to "your license is contingent on being on the vaccine for the rest of your life".

    13. Re:This is news? by plover · · Score: 1

      And if they already had their license revoked for a prior DUI and was driving drunk anyway? This would be a case involving someone who doesn't respect the laws, yet got behind the wheel without a license and killed someone. (I'm putting up a worst-case example for the purpose of the discussion, but these kinds of deaths are tragically common so it's a very real scenario.) Should a judge have the ability to sentence him involuntarily to take the vaccine? I don't want to say "as a condition of his release," because that would be voluntary on the part of the felon. I am interested if there are circumstances where the judge could *force* the vaccine upon him.

      --
      John
    14. Re:This is news? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I like a drink every now and then. However, given that choice I wouldn't even hesitate to take the shot. Seriously you'd take 6 months over not drinking? There's other tasty non alcoholic drinks out there, and a million other ways to get a buzz if you feel the need.

      No, I can't imagine giving up alcohol for the rest of my life.

      1. I live in New Orleans, I'd likely legally be forced to move.

      2. I like to cook...I often cook with alcohols (red gravy is NOT the same without some red wine, alcohol releases flavors in tomatoes that don't come out any other way), and despite what they tell you, you NEVER cook out all the alcohol.

      3. What other legal way is there to get a good buzz on?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:This is news? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Without producing an exhaustive list, marijuana comes to mind first. It's legal in like 10+ states from what I understand and based on all the hubub about it over the last few years my opinion is that it's headed for national legalization sooner or later. In many places using chemicals or herbs you find at the local gas station aren't illegal (no, I'm not talking about inhaling gas fumes). Besides, I never used the word legal.
      Also, if you go to the doctor instead of the liquor store you can get high off a plethora of prescription medication. Billions do that every day.

    16. Re:This is news? by suutar · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't force him. If, after the 5 years in prison I'd give him, he wants to take the vaccine instead of losing his car and license for life, that's a choice. If he doesn't, fine; if he's caught driving with no license and a stolen vehicle, 5 to 10 will be the best he can expect.

    17. Re:This is news? by tibit · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but calling this vaccine is an overstatement. It's like a birth control injection. Good for a relatively short period.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    18. Re:This is news? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The retards who came up with calling it a vaccine should leave the field, because they are a disgrace. It's like a freakin' birth control shot, not a vaccine, geez.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    19. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a medicine, continuing treatment with ant-abuse is voluntary. As a vaccine, it's a life altering event.

      I'd be interested to see the first DUI case where a judge says "six months in the workhouse OR the vaccine."

      I'd take the vaccine, since it lasts six months as well. From the first paragraph of TFA:

      Imagine this: you’re an alcoholic who has tried everything to quit drinking. No luck. So you go to your doctor, who gives you a vaccine that could change your life. All of a sudden, you’re a new person. Every drink you try to take makes you nauseous, gives you tachycardia--essentially, drinks now give you the equivalent of a horrific hangover. You’re no longer an alcoholic (physically, at least) as long as you go in every six months to get a new vaccine.

    20. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, pothead

    21. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look no further than chemical castration. It's not deemed "cruel and unusual" if you may opt for life imprisonment in a rape murder cage instead.

    22. Re:This is news? by DFurno2003 · · Score: 0

      If this were Australia he could patent them.

    23. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, at least you can drink in jail ;)

    24. Re:This is news? by dissy · · Score: 1

      We force chemical castration on people, and only a decade ago forced physical castration on people.
      We force brain and mind altering psychoactive on people.

      Depending how you view the US prison system, we also force rape upon people as well as torture.

      I don't see why the powers that be would have any personal problems forcing this on people as well.

      That isn't to say I agree or think any of the above is right.
      There really are people who have no respect for the life and well being of those around them, and I do agree a line must be drawn somewhere, I just think that line is way too close to the innocents for comfort.

    25. Re:This is news? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Imagine the relative of a raging alcoholic getting ahold of a dose of the vaccine and going to visit their relation, who happens to be blacked out from a bender.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    26. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be interested to see the first DUI case where a judge says "six months in the workhouse OR the vaccine."

      Well, first of all, get yourself a better lawyer...especially for first offense, you should likely get out of it with maybe probation.

      But if it came down to that...I'd take the 6 months.

      There's something not quite right here... I wonder what it could be? Probably that "first case" (first occurence within the entire legal system) and "first offense" (A singular person's first conviction) aren't remotely the same thing?

    27. Re:This is news? by minderaser · · Score: 1

      ... it's a (permanent?) vaccine ... With a vaccine, the patient does not ...

      Perhaps you should look up the definition of a vaccine before you start spouting nonsense.

    28. Re:This is news? by minderaser · · Score: 1

      I'd take the vaccine, since it lasts six months

      It's not a vaccine.

      In fact, the fact that it only last 6 months PROVES it's not a vaccine. duh

    29. Re:This is news? by tamtaradei · · Score: 1

      Since at least 40 years it's possible to get Disulfiram implanted into your body to get the very same effect. In some countries this is even done by court order.
      http://www.alustonhealth.com/disulfiram-implants

      Several Polish movies contain scenes of someone cutting out their Disulfiram implants (trade name: Esperal) in order to have a drink. For instance (mildly NSFW): http://youtu.be/BbFWIBxtLaQ?t=1m20s

  8. amazing transformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Normally, the liver breaks down alcohol into an enzyme"

    wow, I didn't know EtOH could be broken down into a multi-kilodalton protein! That's some fine science writin' there, Lou.

    1. Re:amazing transformation by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      yes. i was a tad confused about whether the writer actually meant "metabolite" whenever they said "enzyme".

      whole thing sounds a bit clockwork orange to me.

    2. Re:amazing transformation by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      I was also highly confused. Science literacy is important: we live in the 21st century, people. Please don't make basic errors like that! It only feeds misantropy in the rest of us.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    3. Re:amazing transformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was cured all right.

    4. Re:amazing transformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science literacy is important

      Being able to spout facts is not important. Understand why something is the way it is is far more important. Sadly, most people are high school intellectuals (mindless drones) when it comes to science (or anything, really).

    5. Re:amazing transformation by tibit · · Score: 1

      And who the heck said that science literacy == being able to spout facts? You made it up, dear AC.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:amazing transformation by thelexx · · Score: 1

      "whole thing sounds a bit clockwork orange to me"

      Bingo.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    7. Re:amazing transformation by minderaser · · Score: 1

      I was cured all right.

      nice!

    8. Re:amazing transformation by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      You think I just know how alcohol is decomposed? No, I know that alcohol = simple molecule. Enzyme = protein. That should be more than enough to raise a few red flags.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  9. What could possibly go wrong by sokoban · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      It could put you at a higher risk of developing liver cancer. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/alcohol/howdoesalcoholcausecancer/how-does-alcohol-cause-cancer

      If they continued to drink and get sick and drink some more, it sounds like that would be the case. Some people may very well do just that. I'm guessing most people would stop after getting sick a few (or more) times. I guess it would come down to whether the patient thought that risk was worth the reward or not.

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wiki also mentions " Individuals with deficient acetaldehyde dehydrogenase activity are far less likely to become alcoholics, but seem to be at a greater risk of liver damage, alcohol-induced asthma, and contracting cancers of the oro-pharynx and esophagus due to acetaldehyde overexposure."

  10. Another Options for Those that want to stop by KnightMB · · Score: 1

    I can see this is a good option for those that really want to stop drinking. But.... drinking is a twisted cocktail of the poison alcohol and the feelings that go with it (or lack of perhaps, the numbing) that keep people drinking. So this may be the push that people trying to quit need. If the just the drinking makes you feel sick enough to not want to drink anymore, more power to them! It may not be a perfect solution for those trying to stop, but at least it is another option. I just hope the vaccine itself is not so expensive as to make it only available to the wealthy to use.

  11. REverse this!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ok..talk about a GREAT $$$$ making endeavour!!

    Make another vaccine (or possibly something in pill form), that increases that second enzyme, and makes hangovers less and less painful!!

    I never knew what a hangover was till I was in my mid-30's...then BAM....

    Now, sure I can still drink quite a bit....not even getting very drunk at times, but man, I pay for it for 2+ days now at times.

    :(

    If this is what happened to me....I'd pay a TON of money to be able to regenerate that 2nd enzyme production to lower the acetaldehyde (sp?) and lower the hangover pain.

    Drinking is fun for those that can handle their booze....if you could get rid of the hangover, it would be great for those that still like to party a bit.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:REverse this!!! by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      Agreed! My tolerance is what it used to be but still decent...

      That HANGOVERS though... They could kill a person

    2. Re:REverse this!!! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      PLEASE TAKE MY MONEY!

      *Throws money at screen*

      That is what they should be trying to do.

    3. Re:REverse this!!! by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      > Make another vaccine (or possibly something in pill form), that increases that second enzyme, and makes hangovers less and less painful!!

      Hell, just add it to the drink.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:REverse this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok..talk about a GREAT $$$$ making endeavour!!

      Make another vaccine (or possibly something in pill form), that increases that second enzyme, and makes hangovers less and less painful!!

      I never knew what a hangover was till I was in my mid-30's...then BAM....

      Stop drinking until you pass out.

      After you're done drinking, before you go to bed, drink water. A lot of it. When you wake up in the middle of the night to go piss, drink more water.

      It may not prevent the hangover completely, but the vast majority of it will be much better. The rest of it depends on what it is you drink (In general, the clearer the alcohol, the less of a hangover).

    5. Re:REverse this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok..talk about a GREAT $$$$ making endeavour!!

      Make another vaccine (or possibly something in pill form), that increases that second enzyme, and makes hangovers less and less painful!!

      I never knew what a hangover was till I was in my mid-30's...then BAM....

      Now, sure I can still drink quite a bit....not even getting very drunk at times, but man, I pay for it for 2+ days now at times.

      :(

      If this is what happened to me....I'd pay a TON of money to be able to regenerate that 2nd enzyme production to lower the acetaldehyde (sp?) and lower the hangover pain.

      Drinking is fun for those that can handle their booze....if you could get rid of the hangover, it would be great for those that still like to party a bit.

      I volunteer to help develop this, I don't get hangovers, about the worst thing that happens to me is being slightly lethargic the next day. I'm almost 40 and my tolerance has only gone up. I'd be happy to trade this to the world for whatever makes those assholes who can literally eat Ho-Hos all day and never gain an ounce, get working on that at the same time please.

    6. Re:REverse this!!! by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      It's dehydration, you don't need a shot. Just plenty of Water after your drinking episode. Rehydrate your body, you have pissed all the Water out with the help of Alcohol.

    7. Re:REverse this!!! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      I usually do pretty well just drinking a glass of water for every couple drinks I have. It seems like any hangovers I have are mostly the result of dehydration. I don't drink an awful lot even when I'm drinking though, so it could just be that I'm staying below the hangover threshold too...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    8. Re:REverse this!!! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0

      If you're getting a hangover, you can't handle your drink.

      You shouldn't drink so much, then come home and pass out. Drink a bit less, then when you get home have a wee something to eat and a cup of tea, a glass or two of water as you listen to some quiet and calm music, maybe troll slashdot a little, then go to bed once you've wound down a bit.

      Of course, if you could handle your drink, you'd be doing that already.

    9. Re:REverse this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're drinking water once you have a hangover to try to feel better you're doing it wrong. You need to hydrate before and during. It's far too late once the hangover hits.

    10. Re:REverse this!!! by adolf · · Score: 1

      I stopped getting hangovers when I started taking Celexa for depression: Poof, gone.

      It has done wonders for my alcohol intake.

    11. Re:REverse this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a good idea, sure, but one of the quickest ways to addiction that I've seen is to not have downsides. All 'fun' drugs have down sides. With alcohol it's the hangover. With opiates it's the stoned 'off' feeling afterwards. With stimulants its the hard crash. Take away that debt and there's no reason in your subconscious not to do them 24/7. Almost all the serious alcoholics I've seen almost never have problems with hangovers. Almost all the opiate addicts I've ever seen could eat three Oxycontin and not have a tiny bit of nausea, when they were like 12. With stimulants, most of the people I've seen hopelessly hooked on them don't have much of a crash.

      I mean, you can only say to yourself, "I won't get addicted!" so much, but when it becomes an urge almost as strong as hunger or going to see your significant other, it's hard to resist. I've never been an addict myself, but the few times I've had opiates left over from surgeries and the like and have taken them recreationally, there's still that little voice occasionally telling me I should do more to have fun. But there's the counterweight of the threat of addiction, nausea, that stoned feeling, etc. It'd be a lot harder to resist if there were simply no downsides.

    12. Re:REverse this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Drinking is fun for those that can handle their booze

      Studies show that drinking causes brain damage. This can be seen e.g. as memory problems. Do you remember things that happened last year? I do. But I have a lot of friends who drink and have problems even remembering what they did yesterday. Drinking can cause also other problems that literally ruin your life. So I suggest that you study the risk and try to figure out another ways to have fun.

    13. Re:REverse this!!! by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Ok..talk about a GREAT $$$$ making endeavour!!

      Make another vaccine (or possibly something in pill form), that increases that second enzyme, and makes hangovers less and less painful!!

      Nice!

      Let's see you get that one through the FDA. Anything that makes life better is *not* allowed.

    14. Re:REverse this!!! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Sure, ok.

      Skydiving! Excellent fun. Or better yet, base jumping. That's a real rush.

      Or did you want us to wrap ourselves in cotton wool and never leave the house?

      Life is dangerous. 100% fatality rate up to now, so just get over it already.

    15. Re:REverse this!!! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Then don't put it through the FDA.

      Find some other country with a good medical regulatory regime and less a stupid claim of what "moral" behaviour is, get them to do the safety and efficacy checks, and monitor production standards. Then you've just got the same problems as any drug smuggler, without the majority of the "moral" concerns. Next step : $$$ profit.

      Or there's the Japanese "scientific whaling" tactic : run a trial on the compound for, say, longitudinal prevention of ankle sprains, requiring 150million participants over 50 years. Shouldn't be too hard to get people to volunteer for the trial, as long as the first-stage (safety and dosage) trials are OK and the efficacy looks fair.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    16. Re:REverse this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love drinking and I never get hangovers. This would suck completely.

    17. Re:REverse this!!! by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Except if you have to run illegally, you'll have a limited market and be competing with other smugglers who likely aren't the kind of competition that will respect any patent you have.

    18. Re:REverse this!!! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Plan B then : if you think that you're good enough, move to a country with laws and regulations that you approve of more than the one you're in at the moment. Governments don't like to think that the rules of the market apply to them, but they do. (At least, for productive people.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  12. That's no vaccine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a nightmare!

    - an Irishman

  13. Vaccine? by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think they understand what a "vaccine" is. Can we (especially the media) stop throwing that word around for everything? A vaccine immunizes you against a disease, by getting the body to produce antibodies.

    1. Re:Vaccine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots have gotten "Alcoholism" classified as a disease, so technically a treatment that immunizes you against alcoholism would be a vaccine in the "one time immunization to a disease" sense.

      At least in the common vernacular. In medical terminology vaccines likely do refer strictly to immunization against virii.

    2. Re:Vaccine? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      I don't think they understand what a "vaccine" is. Can we (especially the media) stop throwing that word around for everything? A vaccine immunizes you against a disease, by getting the body to produce antibodies.

      Why stop there? Real vaccinations are only to prevent smallpox (and come from cows). You're thinking "inoculation".

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Vaccine? by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In medical terminology vaccines likely do refer strictly to immunization against virii.

      No, vaccines are anything you use to provoke an antibody response against something. This includes viruses, but also bacteria toxins (toxoid vaccines, like the diphtheria and tetanus vaccines), and other things, such as TA-CD ( which produces antibodies against cocaine).

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    4. Re:Vaccine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      antibodies don't fight "diseases". they fight antigens, actual molecules you can see with a microscope. a disease isn't something physical like a virus, it's a condition with symptoms.

      alcoholism is absolutely a disease. if you don't agree, think about what a disease is. try and define it (if you look up the word you'll find its definition rather broad). then, see if alcoholism falls under your definition - i'm betting it will.

      for one, alcoholism is largely genetic. if you don't have the specific gene (or set of genes, i can't remember) that triggers alcoholism, you're very unlikely to become a true alcoholic. but if you do, it's fairly likely. i encourage anyone who doesn't understand this to read more about the subject, because alcoholism isn't really that controversial of an issue - doctors agree, it's a disease with a clear treatment path that works.

    5. Re:Vaccine? by WhatAreYouDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Other than the "vaccine" portion of this so-called-treatment, isn't this pretty close to Clockwork Orange stuff? If we can make you feel sick, you will stop the behavior... But yeah, how is this a vaccine?

      --
      "What are you doing here, Elijah?"
    6. Re:Vaccine? by a_hanso · · Score: 1

      Vaccines, in a broader sense, enhance your bodies natural abilities, not break them. Which is what this thing does.

  14. Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by zifferent · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this works. Expect to see people get court-ordered to get an injection after alcohol-related offenses. The CJ will do anything and everything in their power to make the criminal's life unbearable, rob them of the self-esteem, and keep them in the system.

    --
    cat sig > /dev/null
    1. Re:Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by Psyborgue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Better an injection that lasts 6 months and can teach a person self control in the mean time than a sentence to a cult-like organization that convinces you that you're destined to die unless you attend their fruity little club until the end of your life. AA's success rate is no better than the spontaneous rate of remission (doing nothing at all). Yet it's worshiped as a solution because A: it's free and B: proselytization is part of the program. Popularity != quality. Fucking cancerous boil of a religion on the ass of science. Thank god for scientific solutions like this that can finally put the nail the the quackery coffin, but you can bet your ass twelve steppers and their ilk will be out in (often anonymous) force, trying to get this banned or at least lobbying against it's use.

    2. Re:Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by zifferent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh this would be infinitely better if it was a one-or-the-other situation. Knowing the system it will be, get this shot, & take these classes. & attend AA twice a week for a year, & go see a counselor twice a month, & visit a probation officer to pee in a cup all the while forcing the person to pay for it all twice what it is all worth. Weee!

      --
      cat sig > /dev/null
    3. Re:Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Sadly, you're absolutely right.

    4. Re:Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in AA, and use it as a valuable tool to help me in my life - no more than that. I have other tools as well that I use. This alcoholic thinks the shot sounds like a fine idea, if seen as a very handy tool, but not the be all and end all and the answer for everything. Addiction is a very tricky thing - it affects people differently. If this helps someone get over their craving and onto a happier life, then God bless them. Any help is good help :)

    5. Re:Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by not_a_bot · · Score: 1

      Wow. Somebody needs a hug, although not from anybody in AA. Some people find the acceptance and awareness of groups to be of comfort, without having to adopt the theism found in the 12 step books. There's all kinds of different ways to treat an addiction, and although some ways are more public that others (Like AA). There are atheist AA groups, Sober Recovery, SOS, Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy, Cognitive Behavior Therapy. There's antipsychotics and antidepressants. There's antabuse - which does exactly the same thing as the "vaccine" - only it only lasts up to 5 days, not 30. There used to be subcutaneous antabuse implants which lasted 30 days too. People still drank on them. People will still take drugs while on methadone. It's in an addict's nature to take something. Anything that helps somebody away from their addiction is a good thing. To dismiss the value of any particular approach because of a few zealous wingnuts is simply wrongheaded and harmful. Addictions - be it alcohol, crack, heroin, gambling, food - they all kill. Attitudes that all you need is self control and more willpower display out of a complete lack of knowledge the biology of addiction, and show a disturbing lack of empathy for what an addict goes through. If the "vaccine" works for a few people, it has value as a treatment strategy. If SSRI medication works for some, it has value. If talk therapy, be it in a professional or informal group setting like AA, work, that also has value. Some people will need none of these aids, some will will need more that what can be found. Just like calling something a cure does not make something a cure, cursing at something and calling it awful does not make it an awful thing.

    6. Re:Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by crackspackle · · Score: 1

      Alright, I'll bite and even post under my id since heck, you still don't have a clue who I am. It's obvious either yourself or someone you know was "forced" into AA and hatted it. Tha's fine. Some like me, do like it and I credit it with helping me to stay sober over 14 years.

      Better an injection that lasts 6 months and can teach a person self control in the mean time than a sentence to a cult-like organization

      I agree no one should be forced by the courts to attend AA, however, that's a problem with the court system itself. No one in AA is asking for it. Judges probably use it as an alternative to other measures because out of all the options, it's the one most readily available. The average American city has over a thousand meetings each week spread all over the calendar.

      that convinces you that you're destined to die unless you attend their fruity little club until the end of your life

      No, the general dogma is that you will die (sooner) from alcoholism if you don't quit drinking. Of course, no one can say what will happen to any one individual any more than one can say smoking will cause you to get cancer so many in AA prefer to say "jails, institutions or death" which is more to the point. At the very least, continued use very, very rarely has a positive outcome.

      AA's success rate is no better than the spontaneous rate of remission (doing nothing at all)

      No one has found a viable scientific way to determine the efficacy of AA. Some people never stay sober. Others do. Of those that do, many move on. Some decide they hate AA and find other ways to quit. More power to them. What AA does offer is a very large group of alcoholics who have remained sober for extended periods.

      Yet it's worshiped as a solution because A: it's free and B: proselytization is part of the program.

      A self help group for drunks tries to help drunks. That's the way it works. Proselytization suggests someone is trying to convert you to their belief with the particular idea that it's the one, true way. No one in AA will ever tell you that, at least the ones following the principles. The traditions state "we are a program of attraction, not promotion." In AA, we share our stories and anyone is free to pick and choose which parts if any they find useful and leave the rest behind. As far as the free part, you argue that ???

      Popularity != quality. Fucking cancerous boil of a religion on the ass of science.

      I get it. You hate AA. Like most haters, it's because of the "God" factor. No doubt your familiar "god of your own understanding" and "higher power" part and while Penn and Teller's rock and tree schtick is funny, most atheists, anti-theists, or agnostics choose Group Of Drunks. Religious people tend to choose whatever deity fits their religion. I went to AA because I was not able to quite on my own. People also hate the "powerless over alcohol" part but the previous self-truth pretty much defines that. AA offers the support of many other drunks who have overcome their addiction, all of whom at the point I went in had better ideas about how to stay sober than I did. Total self-reliance to quit would imply that I never so much as even considered any other ideas about quitting drinking let alone took any anabuse, naltrexone or this vaccine, should it become available. As you pointed out, I would have had to spontaneously quit on my own, something at the point I was at would not have happened.

      Thank god for scientific solutions like this that can finally put the nail the the quackery coffin,

      Like it or not, you can't deny their are people who stay sober using AA. It's never been offered up as a solution to the physical aspect of craving nor any of it's causes nor put forth as a medicine to cure drunks and as such can't be called quakery. It's obviously involves beliefs that you do not espouse, but th

    7. Re:Just What the Criminal Justice System Ordered by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Was I court ordered into AA? No. Did I ever go voluntarily? No. Does any of this matter? No. I don't like AA for the same reason I don't like Scientology, Islam, or most any other religion. I consider it dangerous bullshit. I don't need to be a member of an organisation to study it. I'd think being an impartial observer would make me more, and not less, qualified to comment. I have known members, have talked to members, have read the dogma, and have come to my own conclusions, just as I have with any number of other religions, cults, and cult-like groups.

      "Attraction, not promotion" is a nice slogan, but like the distinction between "spiritual" and "religious", it merely serves to obfuscate. Are you trying to tell me that if an AA member meets a drunk, he's not going to invite him or her to a meeting? The 12th step states "Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.". That sounds a lot like prosthelytizing to me, whether you want to call it that or not. Does AA claim to be the only way? It does and it doesn't. Like most religions, contradictions abound.

      The big book states on page 44 (all references 3rd edition) "suffering from an illness which only a spiritual experience will conquer ... At first some of us tried to avoid the issue, hoping against hope we were not true alcoholics. But after a while we had to face the fact that we must find a spiritual basis of life — or else". Page 257 states "he was insisting that he had found the only cure". Page 259 states "they had found the only remedy". the 12&12 states "Unless each A.A. member follows to the best of his ability our suggested Twelve Steps to recovery, he almost certainly signs his own death warrant. His drunkenness and dissolution are not penalties inflicted by people in authority; they result from his personal disobedience to spiritual principles." This is nothing to say for the slogans such as "our way or the die way" or "work the steps or die". It's very, very, clear that despite your claims, both mainstream AA literature and the majority of practitioners hold AA to indeed be the only way, and they're not shy about shoving it down newcomer's throats. You're either dissembling, or misinformed.

      You're right that many atheists "choose" AA. Many do not know how stooped in dogma the program is until they're thoroughly involved. Many others, as you point out, do not have a choice. You claim that AA has nothing to do with this. Why then, does AA instruct it's members to lobby the courts (official AA publication), you can see how the "attraction" dogma is rationalized away? AA recieves a significant portion of it's membership from programs and court orders. This has been the case since AA's beginnings. Again. You either dissemble, or you are misinformed.

      I don't deny there are some people who stay sober using AA, nor do I deny that there are those who stay sober by dressing up in a tu tu and dancing the macerena on one leg. It doesn't mean either solution is effective compared to a control group, which has been done and is very much possible despite your insistence. It also has been done and AA has never been shown to be effective. Some studies (Brandsma, et al) would seem to actually suggest it increases binge drinking behavior, which is not surprising considering the "one drink, one drunk" dogma drilled into member's heads. While you're right that AA itself may never take a standpoint on such a public matter as this vaccine or antabuse, you can guarantee that those who find AA to be the one and only cure to a "spritual" disease will try their best to "help" those suffering from Alcholism to find the "right" solutions.

  15. Stupid by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    We created alcohol in part because it was the only way to store the energy in grains for human consumption over long ranges of time where the grains would have otherwise rotted. Beer was supposedly invented in Egypt precisely for this. That it had entertainment or recreational value was secondary back then.

    Now someone makes a 'vaccine' that reduces the human body's ability to process one kind of energy source we have. This is an evolutionary step backwards.

  16. The Antidote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a carne asada burrito vaccine. Side effects include wanting to lay on the couch and increased nostalgia for 80's movies.

  17. Typo in summary by damn_registrars · · Score: 2
    The line

    which in turn is degraded into another enzyme

    Should say

    which in turn is degraded by another enzyme

    It makes no sense for a product of alcohol degradation to become an enzyme on it's own.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Typo in summary by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1
      The line

      to become an enzyme on it's own

      should say:

      to become an enzyme on its own

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    2. Re:Typo in summary by JDevers · · Score: 1

      You are being pedantic, he is attempt to correct a pretty severe error in the summary. That particular error occurs twice and it is almost certainly NOT a typo. It may be caused by automatic translation, but appears to be the product of a summarizer who has no idea about what it is they are summarizing.

    3. Re:Typo in summary by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I can't seem to prevent myself from making that particular mistake.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    4. Re:Typo in summary by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Ah nuts, you're right. I apologize.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    5. Re:Typo in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, I was utterly incapable of understanding the post until you explained that. How did you figure it out?

  18. How about the reverse? by neminem · · Score: 1

    If you came up with something that would basically give you a super-hangover from alcohol, by blocking the breakdown of a chemical responsible for hangovers... it seems to reason you could also figure out how to cause faster breakdown of the same chemical. If it was really mostly responsible for hangovers, it seems like that would make billions of dollars as the first truly reliable hangover preventative. I know I'd buy it (if there weren't other worse side effects).

    Meanwhile, I can't imagine many alcoholics would care. They'd just *drink more* to counteract the effects of the hangover. You know, like they already do?

  19. The only people who will be opposed by Psyborgue · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will be 12 stepping fanatics who think that the only way to get over an addiction / bad habit is through their fucked up religion.

    1. Re:The only people who will be opposed by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      think that the only way to get over an addiction / bad habit is through their fucked up religion.

      Is there a non fucked up religion?
      Hint, read my Sig for my opinion.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:The only people who will be opposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will be 12 stepping fanatics who think that the only way to get over an addiction / bad habit is through their fucked up religion.

      Come on now... Out of all the religions in the world, you have to admit that that 12-step higher power hoohaw is pretty low on the obnoxiousness scale.
      I'll take one of my friends becoming a 12-step fanatic as they desperately search for a patch for their screwed-up lives over them wandering off into scientology, mormonism, or any of a hundred other truly bizarre cults anyday.

    3. Re:The only people who will be opposed by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      No, though some are more fucked up than others.

    4. Re:The only people who will be opposed by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      If they were truly your friends, you would steer them towards alternatives that work. AA's success rate is no better than the rate of spontanious remission and there is evidence to suggest (brandsma, et al) that it actually increases behaviors such as binge drinking significantly. Hell. Even Scientology's program has a better success rate, though I in no way endorse that. If your friend is sick, choose science, not feel-good bullshit that spreads like a disease on our society.

    5. Re:The only people who will be opposed by mikestew · · Score: 1

      Did an AA member kill your dog? That aside...

      If they were truly your friends, you would steer them towards alternatives that work.

      There are no "alternatives that work". AA and the alternatives all have low success rates. Additionally, what works for one may not work for another. I wouldn't go so far as to call the rehabilitation industry a scam, but there sure is money to be made despite low success rates across the board.

      I wish 30 days at a Malibu treatment center would be guaranteed to work. Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't. Instead I went the AA route. Did the cultish aspects work their magic? Nah, I mostly ignored that. Maybe it's just regularly showing up someplace with like folk. I do wonder what AA's success rate would be if the only ones that showed up were willing. I've been to AA meetings where I was the only person that didn't have to get a slip signed.

    6. Re:The only people who will be opposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that no court forces people to attend Mormon meetings.

      The Mormons make you abstain from alcohol too - yet if a judge forced someone convicted of an alcohol-related offense to join the LDS church, the decision would be immediately overturned on 1st ammendment grounds. Why is AA held to a different standard?

  20. How much to buy one and prank inject someone? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Question, which do you see happening first:

    1) Parents paying to inject their high school kids without asking what the kids think about it.

    2) High school and college kids pranking each other by injecting their ex-'friends' with it.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:How much to buy one and prank inject someone? by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      easier to dose them with a mushroom pizza, made with shaggy mane mushrooms. Same effect, less permanent.

      Mushroom ingestion disrupts enzyme activity for up to 3 weeks.

      Hilariously, shaggy mane mushrooms frequently grow on lawns, and are easily identifiable. There is a reasonably good chance you can find them simply growing on the campus quad, if you live in the northern hemisphere.

      Sadly, due to the nature of the mushroom, it decomposes rapidly after being picked, so only fresh mushroom could be used for this purpose. In terms of taste and texture, it is similar to crimini, though has a different appearance when sliced. Disguising the mushroom in a saute' will not adversely effect the action of the coprine (active agent present in the mushroom) and will enable one to better deliver the joke mushroom to one's peers.

    2. Re:How much to buy one and prank inject someone? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Considering the web page you sited includes this phrase:

      "The mushroom can sometimes be confused with the Magpie fungus which is poisonous."

      I somehow doubt that parents or sane pranksters would prefer to use your method.

      In addition, Both parents and pranksters LIKE the fact that the vaccine is permanent.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:How much to buy one and prank inject someone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Mushroom ingestion disrupts enzyme activity for up to 3 weeks.

      I am all for pranks. I could even be ok with ones that involved some small amount of dosing people.... Hell, I remember reading about guys at the CIA pranking eachother with LSD back during their old experiements with it. I wouldn't even be mad if someone did that to me (and I specifically mean I wouldn't be mad if it happened to me... I would be quite mad to hear it was done to someone else, especially someone less experienced; If you are going to prank someone, its on YOU to know your audience).

      All that said.... 3 weeks? That is kind of on the extreme side for a prank. A few minutes or hours is one thing, but.... 3 weeks? Thats asking for people to hold a gurdge.

    4. Re:How much to buy one and prank inject someone? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      It depends on the metabolism of the subject. It could be as short as 3 days. Arguably still a long time, but the vaccine lasts 6 months!

  21. Horrible summary by TheWingThing · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is one of the most horrible and stupidest summaries I've read in a long time. Enzymes are biochemical catalysts. Ethanol and acetaldehyde are substrates. The substrates get converted into end products with the help of enzymes and energy. Ethanol does not get converted *into* an enzyme known as acetaldehyde. Ethanol gets converted to acetaldehyde by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, through the loss of one hydrogen atom. In the next step, acetaldehyde gets converted into acetic acid (same thing as in vinegar) by the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase through the loss of another hydrogen atom. Acetaldehyde a lot more toxic than acetic acid. If you block the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase (which lacks naturally in a minority of East Asians), there will be an accumulation of excess acetaldehyde, causing very noxious symptoms. This is exactly what drugs like disulfiram ("antabuse") do. What a badly written summary. Both the submitter and the editor need to read some biochemistry or learn to use google before posting rubbish.

    1. Re:Horrible summary by TheWingThing · · Score: 1

      ...Ethanol gets converted to acetaldehyde by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, through the loss of one hydrogen atom. ...

      "by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase" - remove duplication. It's just "by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase". Aarghh!

    2. Re:Horrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biochemistry? I was taught that in basic Biology! That dude literally typed up a summary with no relevance to anything! Maybe it started.with him fearing that his "enzymes" were low and he needed to recharge!

    3. Re:Horrible summary by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

      This is one of the most horrible and stupidest summaries I've read in a long time. Enzymes are biochemical catalysts. Ethanol and acetaldehyde are substrates. The substrates get converted into end products with the help of enzymes and energy. Ethanol does not get converted *into* an enzyme known as acetaldehyde. Ethanol gets converted to acetaldehyde by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, through the loss of one hydrogen atom. In the next step, acetaldehyde gets converted into acetic acid (same thing as in vinegar) by the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase through the loss of another hydrogen atom. Acetaldehyde a lot more toxic than acetic acid. If you block the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase (which lacks naturally in a minority of East Asians), there will be an accumulation of excess acetaldehyde, causing very noxious symptoms. This is exactly what drugs like disulfiram ("antabuse") do. What a badly written summary. Both the submitter and the editor need to read some biochemistry or learn to use google before posting rubbish.

      Right on!

      --
      Nate
    4. Re:Horrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase

      I think someone has been drinking!

  22. Doesn't Anabuse already do this? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Anabuse already do this?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Doesn't Anabuse already do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    2. Re:Doesn't Anabuse already do this? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      It messes with the same mechanism, but probably does it differently (antibodies against the enzyme maybe?) and last longer (Anabuse lasts 2 weeks after the last dose at best, this supposedly lasts 6 months in one shot).

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:Doesn't Anabuse already do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jackass.

    4. Re:Doesn't Anabuse already do this? by tjbp · · Score: 1

      Yep.

  23. Instant Hangover by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe that explains why I get a headache a few hours after having a few beers.

  24. Won't work by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know someone who has this alcohol intolerance. She still drinks, in spite of the rotten feeling afterwords.

    In some cases, alcoholism is about social and psychological dependence. Not the buzz from the chemistry. If people drink because they need it to fit in to a crowd, getting sick won't stop that.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Won't work by tom229 · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. How are worse hangovers supposed to stop alcoholics? AFAIK, prolonged alcohol abuse already can create this enzyme breaking down problem giving alcohol abusers worse hangovers anyways.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    2. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a person who suffers from alcohol intolerance I agree. As a young engineer I spent much of my time on pub crawls (and feeling really crappy while doing it). Took me years to realize that I could only drink in small doses. Now a single beer or a glass of wine is all that I'll drink at a sitting.

      I can attest to how horrible it feels though, but peer pressure and the urge to fit in is pretty powerful stuff.

    3. Re:Won't work by rwyoder · · Score: 1

      I know someone who has this alcohol intolerance. She still drinks, in spite of the rotten feeling afterwords.

      In some cases, alcoholism is about social and psychological dependence. Not the buzz from the chemistry. If people drink because they need it to fit in to a crowd, getting sick won't stop that.

      I can't fathom such irrational behavior. I also have very little tolerance for alcohol. After a few 2-3 day hangovers in my late teens, I figured out that by sticking to a one-drink-per-day rule, I can completely avoid the misery. 2 drinks = headache, and 3+ drinks = headache + nausea. Yes, I must constantly brush off the ignorant fools who try to push me into having "just one more", and firmly put my foot down when a group at a bar expects me to help subsidize them when they order multiple pitchers of beer while I have just one glass. But the only thing worse than waking up sick in the morning, is knowing that it was totally preventable, and that I just wasted a day of my life for no good reason.

    4. Re:Won't work by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      Thanks for saying this. It is a bad idea, stupid at every level, but ultimately for the reason you give here. I also know someone with this intolerance, who still drinks: she's actually pretty good about it though, only having tiny little sips with company of some good wine, and nothing more.

      That said, someone who is a dependent alcoholic isn't drinking because they have the ability to break-down the alcohol, but because they're biochemically rewired to require the alcohol, which is among the few things that will actually hard-wire into your system and kill you if you don't get it as needed: I have alcoholics in the family who are extremely dependent and it's a bet you can make, no matter how long they go to try and fix their lives, they'll eventually fall, fall hard, and be excessively hard to deal with.

      What is rather needed is not some metaphorical stick to disincentivize the behavior, but to decouple that wiring: to reverse the process someone has undergone by drinking long and hard: it doesn't seem to ever start as someone boozing too hard, but rather one day someone who drinks moderately to heavily, but perhaps has never even gotten drunk, suddenly hits it hard all the time, even when they don't want to. People separated from this drug for years in forced rehab come out zealous to build a new and better life and...get found a few months later back in the gutter. It is hard, heartbreaking, and as of now they is not only no easy solution, but there is no known natural and always-applicable solution. : (

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    5. Re:Won't work by swillden · · Score: 1

      I also know someone with this intolerance, who still drinks: she's actually pretty good about it though, only having tiny little sips with company of some good wine, and nothing more.

      So what you're saying is that it works. And in saying that you're agreeing with several other posters who said "It took me years to figure out I can't drink without feeling horrible, so now I never have more than one drink per day".

      to reverse the process someone has undergone by drinking long and hard

      Or to prevent it entirely. If you grew up knowing you'd had the vaccine and that every time you had more than a single drink you'd feel horrible for days (and the more you drank the worse it would get), how likely would you be to drink "long and hard"?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Won't work by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      Nope to both the assertions and your question, or perhaps I should say there are different significances at play here.

      She has a slight allergy to something naturally, meaning she avoids it because of the slight allergy: and it is slight (important for below): rather than having a vaccine that caused an allergy, it is natural.

      On the other hand, inducing an unnatural allergy to a substance that some people abuse, for which some people therefore disapprove, is criminal: it is deciding for someone whether they should ever enjoy something which, besides abuse, should not be considered anything but good, and moreover, is something that is even still necessary in some parts of the world (unless you want water-based poisoning).

      But as to the "you're saying it works", it works for someone who has never been able, and doesn't become too depressed (or similar), because even this gal I know can and will drink alcohol if she gets very down. Merely going "it'll work by making people feel bad" is idiocy: plenty of people keep drinking "long and hard" despite how terrible they feel the next day, for reasons like being miserable, or else because they're simply addicted. Want an example? My father. His processing ability has definitely diminished over decades of drinking, and the effects can take days, but he...still goes at it very frequently. I also know people who start drinking-through the damn drugs: with horrible, horrible, horrible, awful, horrible consequences that last and last...yet they try...

      Let's stop trying to impose very simplistic, invasive, immuno-altering (in a very unnatural way) non-solutions to very difficult problems. As a guy with an extreme immune system (disabled me for 8 months at one point), I know first-hand the consequences of it getting messed-up, and by extension how precarious actions that attempt to "train" it can be. There is also the potentially unintended side-effect nobody's mentioning: if this would make you feel sick for days after, it would probably be much like the current drugs that work to do this same thing by disabling the enzymes in your system for breaking-down alcohol: this means that air fresheners, cleaning supplies, polishes of all kinds, certain oils, hand sanitizer, lotions, and more could all make you very sick: I once sprayed air freshener very slightly in a bathroom to cover-up the smell of using the toilet for #2 and made an uncle on a light dose of the meds start violently heaving; this was across a big apartment with a bunch of walls in-between and the doors closed, and simply leaving the residence wasn't enough: he had to exit the building! That would be a monstrous thing to induce in people.

      Let's leave normal health and physiology alone: the ability to break-down alcohol is both natural, and even at a certain level necessary: if this "vaccination" (immuno-mis-training) goes wrong, ever, it will kill someone: you HAVE to be able to process alcohols at some level, and even the supposedly allergic/intolerant/incapable actually do, just in diminished amounts.

      A real boon, and mercy/grace, to people with this problem, might be one similar to injections that can decouple certain drugs from receptors in the brain, or block their attachment, such that they can within a few treatments actually break dependence: those exist and are in development...but their mechanisms are actually more complex than that, and different from alcohol. This particular proposed "solution" is a sham, it is wishful thinking: I wish it weren't.

      Regards man.

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    7. Re:Won't work by swillden · · Score: 1

      I notice that you never refuted the point that it does actually work. Instead you went off on a big tangent about whether or not it's natural or moral. Those are points worth discussing, but they don't affect my fundamental point that the allergy does, in fact, limit alcohol use.

      As to the question of naturalness... I frankly don't care. Lots of things in my life are unnatural, for example the various vaccines that prevent me from getting all sorts of terrible diseases. And I'm not so sure that it really is "unnatural"... assuming it creates exactly the same situation that exists "naturally" in a non-trivial percentage of the population.

      On the question of morality, I do agree that, for example, a court ordering a drunk driver to get vaccinated against alcohol is on really shaky moral grounds. Vaccinating your kids... that I'm not so sure. You may argue that a parent who does that is depriving their children of the opportunity to enjoy something. I'd argue that the enjoyment in question is at least partially illusory, and that given that there's a history of severely damaging alcoholism in my family, eliminating the risk of the latter is well worth giving up the former.

      Should I make that decision on their behalf? Sure! Parents make all sorts of serious, life-altering decisions for their kids. For a very relevant example, I've inculcated in my kids that alcohol and other mind-altering drugs are bad. I'm fairly certain that the idea has taken root in three of the four, just as it did in me when my parents did the same (I've never had a drink in my life, nor have I ever used any drugs recreationally). Granted that they still have a choice, and indeed one of them has chosen otherwise, though I know she's very conflicted about it, but how different is that, really?

      How different would it be to vaccinate my kids against alcohol rather than try to seek out a mate with the allergy, hoping that they'd get it? Or even go a step further and screen zygotes for the allergy? That'd be natural, right? Would it be any more or less moral than vaccinating?

      Or, what about screening kids after birth for a genetic pre-disposition to alcoholism, and vaccinating them to give them another pre-disposition to counter it? That alcoholism is often genetically pre-disposed is well-known, though I don't know if we know enough to screen for it.

      And what about adults who consciously choose to get vaccinated? Is that wrong? I know a number of alcoholics who would do it in a heartbeat (when they're on the wagon). Of course, its efficacy for those situations is questionable, but from everything I know about it antabuse works very well at deterring drinking; where it breaks down is that alcoholics stop taking it.

      IMO, this sort of therapy shows a lot of promise. It's not a panacea by any means. But it could well prevent a lot of alcoholism, which is terribly destructive and costs society billions.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Won't work by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      And I noticed you didn't actually respond to my points about it not being a prevenative measure, but at any rate: your signature is "Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can oppose safety", which makes your comments funnier: rambling on about predispositions to alcohol and whatnot. ; )

      And "well-known" often means "popular knowledge only half-assedly acquired, partially, inaccurately, and without serious consideration". You don't seem to understand genetic predispositions (as you comments stand): my own studies were actually in biology and genetics. You know that "predisposition" that had test-positive women signing-up to have major mastectomies? Geneticists knew that because of epigenetics, the actual probability of getting breast cancer just because of a present gene was actually very unknown, and merely modifying life behaviors could [very] significantly reduce the likelihood of it developing--because the actual regulation of genes was changed by inputs beyond the genes.

      This is "classically" a "heresy" in genetics thought, but epigenetics fundamentally alters all the old thinking (largely making it irrelevant in all but research on rats in a lab). My family happens to be filled with alcoholics too, but I seem to be the one in it that can drink as much or as little (at will) as he wants...and just enjoy it without getting drunk. In fact, I can down a bottle of higher-proof wine and feel just a little dizzy (at first, it goes away pretty quickly), and ponder to myself "why is this?"

      Removing the ability of someone to enjoy what is a FOOD is not moral: alcohol isn't a "mind altering drug" in the same way as the schedule 1's tend to be. One sip doesn't *tend* (which is key) to be a problem, nor one beer (for a man; ~1/3 for a woman), or even two or three, when someone has a normal BMI. Making that decision for them means they can't go to France or Italy and not insult a host, or to perhaps 3/5ths of the globe without having a serious problem with regards how to get fluids without being infected with water-born illness (the ancient trick of mixing a slight amount of boos or wine with water remains a useful one).

      Perhaps rather than putting fear over actual knowns, a parent should wait to see if their spawn have problems with it, and if these are found later, suggest to them to get such a vaccine? Just sayin'. And to be less contentious...nice Homepage and photowork. : ) No really!

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
  25. There is also a Genetic Basis For Nicotine by kramer2718 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is also a genetic basis for nicotine tolerance. The mechanism is essentially the same. There is an gene that codes for an enzyme which removes nicotine from the bloodstream. This gene has several different alleles that code for more or less effective versions of the same enzyme. Individuals who have the allele that codes for the most effective enzyme are heavy smokers if they smoke. They smoke a cigarette, receive the desired stimulation, and then the enzyme clears the nicotine. Thus they desire another dose soon afterward. Individuals who produce the least effective version of the enzyme get sick when they smoke. The enzyme fails to clear the toxin in a reasonable time and they feel ill, sometimes vomiting. Individuals producing middling effective versions can be occasional smokers. Read more here.

    If researchers can create a treatment for alcohol in this way, they can probably create a smoking treatment as well. It is unlikely, though, that the treatment would alleviate withdrawal symptoms on its own. This approach likely will lead to treatments for other addiction problems also.

    If there come sto exist effective treatments for illegal drugs, there will be serious socio-political implications. The rational for the the war on drugs will be completely destroyed. If people can choose effective treatment, then there will be no unwilling chemical dependence. This will decrease crime, health problems, and other negative effects of dangerous drugs. So there will be no basis for illegality. Will that change the politics surrounding drugs? I don't think so.

    1. Re:There is also a Genetic Basis For Nicotine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're suggesting that someone might be able to create a vaccine that makes drugs that would otherwise cause people to feel good to feel bad instead. And that this could be applied to improve the drug war? I can imagine messes involving forcing people to take the vaccine (either people caught for possession as part of the sentencing or just all children; seems horrible either way).

    2. Re:There is also a Genetic Basis For Nicotine by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      I am not suggesting that anyone be forced to take such a vaccine only that people have access to it. When a junkie gets so desperate for a fix that he turns to crime, he will have another option. Thus, much less drug related crime. Although some will still steal to get drugs because they don't want to quit, there are people who steal to get lots of things.

  26. Hangovers don't stop a lot of drinkers. by meerling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I was in the military, there were some guys that came to work 3 or 4 times a week (almost every week) with hangovers.
    I'm not not talking about the "I'm a little queasy, give me an asprin" kind of hangovers, but rather the "shhhh, you're breathing too loud" kind of hangovers.

    Sure, there are some people who will stop, but there are too many that won't.
    Now if it caused illness fast enough they haven't even finished their beer, then it might have an effect. Of course, those drugs already exist and are in use.
    Also, it has been proven, they don't solve alcoholism, but they do help in it's treatment.

    1. Re:Hangovers don't stop a lot of drinkers. by pavon · · Score: 1

      Exactly, this treatment does nothing to address the biological factors that make alcohol addictive. Instead it just makes it even more unhealthy by eliminating our natural ability process the toxins created when alcohol is consumed. Stupid approach.

    2. Re:Hangovers don't stop a lot of drinkers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people had serious problems in their lives and turned to alcohol to solve them. Even party animal folks eventually get tired of drinking 5+ times a week. It just gets old being sick all the time. Honestly if they're having that many hangovers, their brains are probably re-wiring AGAINST alcohol. Have you ever eaten a food so 'bad' that it made you sick? Even if it was just a freak accident you probably avoided that food for a while. That's how animals evolved, anything bad enough to elicit such a response is to be avoided. It can happen over a period of time, too. I, for example, get more and more repulsed by the 'cherry' cough syrup every time I'm exposed. In five years I've gone from 'meh' to '20 seconds of nearly gagging' upon tasting it....why? I got sick off a liquor that reminded me quite a bit of it.

      So unless their brains are fucked up, they'll get over it sooner or later. Usually it is lifestyle problems that cause it. Difficulty sleeping is one, people often turn to alcohol to cure insomnia (which makes it worse). Depression is another...alcohol is a very short acting anti-depressant. Also it is used to treat underlying anxiety issues.

  27. Way to drag down your credibility, doc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . 'People have this mutation all over the world. It's like how some people can't drink milk,' says Asenjo.

    Uh, except it's not like that... inability to tolerate milk can be from several distinct causes, and most cases are unrelated to any human mutations.

    Most of the time, it's a gut bacteria issue, and can be "cured" with kefir and yoghurt and probiotics. Sometimes the "cure" has to be maintained because of an inability to maintain a stable population of lactophilic bacteria in the gut, but sometimes it's one-shot and done.

    Sometimes, it's an allergy, and attempting the yoghurt cure can be extremely painful and unproductive (potentially fatal, although I've never heard of that actually happening).

    And yeah, sometimes it's a mutation. That's the least common reason for inability to digest milk. So you sound like a quack, doc.

  28. Where will they go for their high by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Except that in most cases are these addicts not just addicted to being high and they happen to choose alcohol because it is free and cheap?

    Is it not exceedingly likely that if we inoculated every drunk with this today that in a week 80% of them would be crack addicts or similarly worse off?

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Where will they go for their high by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Where? Hmm. How about BC, WA, CO, or CA?

      You guys live in your right wing nanny state if you want. We're Free in the West.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Where will they go for their high by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the original article, or even the title?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Where will they go for their high by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the original article, or even the title?

      Yes, I did.

      In fact, I've read various scientific papers on Asian inability to tolerate milk substances and alcoholic beverages, and I work in medical genetics as a bioinformatician.

      I was answering the question. (hence the subject line above)

      You don't seem to like the answer, even if it's true. That's not my problem.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Where will they go for their high by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The article is about making people unable to consume alcohol, permanently. It is not about restricting the sale of alcohol. After you are biologically incapable of drinking, how would a change of venue help?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re:Where will they go for their high by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The article is about making people unable to consume alcohol, permanently. It is not about restricting the sale of alcohol. After you are biologically incapable of drinking, how would a change of venue help?

      I am not referring to the consumption or imbibing of alcoholic beverages.

      I am referring to other intoxicants which are legal in other states and provinces, specifically BC, WA, CO, and CA.

      Hence, an other option which exists for people who (as the original post above asked) "where will they go for their high".

      Doubt this would impact Kaht in NE Africa, or similar other things, as well. Different biochemical chain.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  29. injested chemicals get broken down to enzymes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously not someone who ever looked at Biochem or even basic physiology.

  30. Huzzah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cure to alcohol addiction?

    I'll drink to that!

  31. Biochemistry failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly does alcohol break down into an enzyme? I think you mean that alcohol is broken down into acetaldehyde by an enzyme, and the acetaldehyde is broken down by another enzyme.

  32. Tag: whereisthefuckingpaper by Guppy · · Score: 1

    Closest thing I've been able to find thus far is this paper from 2010: Viral vectors for the treatment of alcoholism: Use of metabolic flux analysis for cell cultivation and vector production

    The article didn't make too much sense at first, as human acetaldhyde dehydrogenases are located either in the cytosol or mitochondria; vaccine-stimulated antibodies would not be expected to be able to block the enzyme's activity. A gene-therapy agent would be able to accomplish the task, however.

  33. hangover vaccine by guantamanera · · Score: 1

    I'll work on a vaccine to make me inmune to hangovers. I am sure will make more profit.

  34. My wife has this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife has natural alcohol intolerance. She can't even stand the smell of it. Kind of annoying that I can't get her drunk!

  35. Thank god some of us live in WA BC CO or CA by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing some of us live in states or provinces where we have other choices, besides alcohol.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Thank god some of us live in WA BC CO or CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay we know you smoke dope, we get it.

    2. Re:Thank god some of us live in WA BC CO or CA by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Okay we know you smoke dope, we get it.

      Actually, I don't. Nice try, though.

      Freedom doesn't require you do the things you want to be free.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  36. Re:Doubtful (taste) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Actually, I tend to drink for the taste. I prefer Ice Cider, a good red wine with meat, a nice Gewurztraminer with salads, and various mixed drinks.

    Don't like most beers, gin, whiskey, but there are some decent rums.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. Such resentment! by kawabago · · Score: 0

    You must be still suffering. There is no way to 'get over' an addiction. You can only stop imbibing, you will always be an addict. The 12 step program uses peoples existing religious beliefs, it proposes no new concept of God or belief. A 12 step program asks only that you admit you are powerless over your addiction and only a power greater than yourself can help you overcome it. There is no definition of what that greater power is, some people use God, some atheists find whatever concept works for them, but they all use the same 12 step program and it is the only thing that has been found to work so far. No I don't have any addictions and I'm not in a 12 step program.

    1. Re:Such resentment! by Psyborgue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must still be suffering? It's useless talking to you zombie fucks. Anybody who dares criticize the great organization is automatically a drunk. The 12 step program was judged a religion by the SCOTUS precisely because they found the distinction between "religion" and "spiritual" to be an obfuscation. You can believe whatever you want, and if you think you're not a member, being close to a member is close enough to soak up the BS as you so evidently show (if you're even telling the truth). Hell. In this day and age, watching TV / pop culture, stooped in dogma, is enough.

    2. Re:Such resentment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please mod up. i used to be skeptical of 12-step too, but once you learn about it it really does make sense, and it's been *proven* to work for those willing to do it.

      that's not to suggest that other methods of treating addiction don't work, but they certainly have a much lower success rate than 12-step.

    3. Re:Such resentment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen just how effective it is? Barely anymore so than just trying to quit on your own. Here.

    4. Re:Such resentment! by Psyborgue · · Score: 4, Informative

      It has not been proven to work. It has been proven to be no better than doing nothing at all (spontanious rate of remission). Penn and Teller even did an episode on it (search YouTube). Pretty damning stuff. AA is popular because it is free, because people are court ordered into it, and because prosthelitizing is part of the program, not because of any inherent quality.

    5. Re:Such resentment! by tibit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The idea that people are powerless over their addiction is a load of looney-tunes. Demonstrably so. Either you stop drinking and you're not suffering anymore, or you don't, and you remain an alcoholic. Of course a separate problem is whether you're cured as in you can keep drinking occasionally like any other person, or should you abstain forever. That is a separate issue. There are many people who can't in fact drink at all, because the feedback loop in their brain is so strong that once they resume drinking, the slide into alcoholism. But if you're not an alcoholic, but previously were, then duh you have overcome your addiction. You, not his noodly appendage.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:Such resentment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jeez, so much fucking hate. if the voodoo helps someone feel better, even if its known to just be a placebo, what's it to you?

    7. Re:Such resentment! by Psyborgue · · Score: 2

      It prevents people from seeking or discovering or creating actual solutions if they already believe God gave the perfect solution to some philandering scam artist in the thirties. It's religion, it spreads like a disease, and by preventing actual progress, it actually kills people like one. That is why I hate it. Yes. Hate. I hate what destroys society and drags us all down into ignorance. Is that not reason enough?

    8. Re:Such resentment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Parent deserves +1 correct moderation.

      A year ago I was drinking a fifth of vodka every day, sometimes more. That's 17+ standard drinks a day by american standards, at least. Enough to cause seizures, hallucinations, and possibly death if I had stopped drinking "cold turkey".

      So I didn't go cold turkey. I didn't go to a single AA meeting and I sure as HELL didn't check into "rehab". Instead, I bought a calendar and marked off how many drinks a day I was allowed. I started with 17 drinks a day and drank one less drink per day until I was down to 2 drinks per day, which I kept up for a few weeks until I became an occasional drinker. There were a couple of fuckups along the way where I drank way more than I should have. But in the morning after I'd check the calendar and resolve to keep trying. It worked, and I'm not normally an especially strong-willed person. I think it was the knowledge that alcoholism would kill me and ruin all my relationships if I didn't do something about it. Oh also, it was very satisfying to contradict the very unthinking common opinion that quitting drinking is "impossible on your own". It's all about willpower and priorities. Some people definitely need help quitting alcohol because they lack the will to do it themselves, but I think that fear and misinformation pushes a lot of people into AA and rehab unnecessarily.

      People have been using alcohol to taper off of alcohol-dependence for as long as people have been drinking alcohol. Keep that in mind at all times. If you AA nuts think I'm full of shit then why don't you go talk to some vietnam veterans and hear about how they quit heroin all on their own when they returned to the 'States.

    9. Re:Such resentment! by dissy · · Score: 1

      A 12 step program asks only that you admit you are powerless over your addiction and only a power greater than yourself can help you overcome it.

      That which does not kill me does NOT make me stronger. *I* make me stronger when I refuse to let it kill me.

      I've had two addictions in my life, and both are now very far behind me.
      One is beaten. I've never wanted no more a part of something in my life than that.
      The other, while I admit I could enjoy those feelings again, I have chosen not to accept all the negative that would again come with it, and my own self control is all that was needed - proving no higher power beyond the human mind is needed.

      I have had little to no support either during nor after those times of my life, however I am far from powerless and in fact I am the only power that both started and stopped, thus the only power that matters.

      If AA helps you, more power to you. If you need help, and there is Anything that helps, again more power to you. I truly hope you get as much help as you desire, and reach a point of not being controlled by addiction - or if you are there, that you stay there.

      But claiming one is powerless when they are not, and claiming there is no way to overcome it, is nothing but enabling. You can believe as you wish of course, but please stop trying to convince others of what is not true. It will only serve to harm them.

      The solution for equality is not to pull others down to your worse levels, but to raise yourself above that.

    10. Re:Such resentment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many people who can't in fact drink at all, because the feedback loop in their brain is so strong that once they resume drinking, the slide into alcoholism.

      My (admittadly unscientific) observation is that AA actually makes this worse.

      Several of my friends have gone through the program. When someone in AA relapses, they relapse HARD. It's never just a few too many drinks; they have to get blackout drunk, take lots of drugs, etc. I have always suspected that this has something to do with the AA dogma that 'you are powerless over your addiction'. Tell that to someone often enough and they will start to believe it.

    11. Re:Such resentment! by crackspackle · · Score: 1

      It prevents people from seeking or discovering or creating actual solutions if they already believe God gave the perfect solution

      If it doesn't work for you, find another solution. If it does work, then why bother ? No one has ever put up AA to be the cure.

      to some philandering scam artist in the thirties.

      Philandering ? Maybe. Scan artist... He was a stock market prior to the Great Depression but it's all about as relevant as the state of the nation was to Clinton getting a blowjob.

      It's religion,

      There are no priests, no compunction to believe in a god, no churches, no tax breaks, and no privileged conversation. How is that a religion ?

      and by preventing actual progress, it actually kills people like one.

      Can you cite one example where it stopped progress ? It's not a perfect solution but it's helped a great many people who would have died otherwise. That some still do while tragic, isn't a sensible reason to stop using it as the tool it is, any more than ignoring the possibilities this vaccine could have. It's easy to see though with this vaccine, it could lead to worse addictions (relatively speaking) as people compensate for the loss of alcohol by using harder drugs.

      That is why I hate it. Yes. Hate. I hate what destroys society and drags us all down into ignorance. Is that not reason enough?

      From Herbert Spencer: “There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation”.

    12. Re:Such resentment! by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Either you stop drinking and you're not suffering anymore, or you don't, and you remain an alcoholic.

      Not drinking *IS* suffering for an alcoholic. :(

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  38. I already find alcohol intolerable by tylersoze · · Score: 0, Troll

    I mean, I can't stand the taste, how do you people even drink this stuff? The only way I can drink an alcoholic beverage is if it's watered so completely I can't even taste it. Not to mention I don't even understand the appeal, I have no desire to have my mental functions impaired in any way whatsoever, and I find *drinkers* of alcohol intolerable as well. I can understand drugs that might be mind expanding, like LSD or mushrooms or whatever, but this blacking out drunk, acting obnoxious, and waking up with a hangover I just don't get.

    1. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but this blacking out drunk, acting obnoxious, and waking up with a hangover I just don't get

      Congrats, you just described a small minority of people who drink alcohol.

    2. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, I can't stand the taste, how do you people even drink this stuff? The only way I can drink an alcoholic beverage is if it's watered so completely I can't even taste it.

      Nothing wrong with that - in fact, if it tastes like burning, whatever your drinking is shit meant for dumbass college kids and old insecure white guys who don't feel confident about their sexuality.

      God help me for the comparison, but: alcohol is like anime. For every one item of good booze, there's trillions of gallons of rotgut swill that everyone should feel terrible about humanity having produced.

      Not to mention I don't even understand the appeal, I have no desire to have my mental functions impaired in any way whatsoever, and I find *drinkers* of alcohol intolerable as well.

      Some people find it fun, since for the average person, it makes even the most painful of puns hilarious; music sounds better; people look far more attractive.

      I can understand drugs that might be mind expanding, like LSD or mushrooms or whatever

      The idea that LSD and mushrooms are mind expanding is hilarious. They're mind-altering, nothing more. So's alcohol.

      but this blacking out drunk, acting obnoxious, and waking up with a hangover I just don't get.

      Blacking out is a sign of abuse, not normal - or even heavy - consumption. Acting obnoxious? That's got nothing to do with the drug, and everything to do with the person. You'll find obnoxious people drinking, smoking pot, dropping acid, snorting coke, even smoking cigarettes.

      Here's the thing: People are obnoxious, and alcohol is relatively easy to access compared to other drugs. Naturally, you're going to encounter more obnoxious people with beer in hand rather than bong or shroom smoothie in hand, because you're not running the risk of having your life destroyed by walking into the store and buying a case of PissenWateren.

      The hangover thing is annoying and - at least when people have them - a very valid and weighty point in the 'totally not worth it' side of the comparison chart.

    3. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by OzPeter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      but this blacking out drunk, acting obnoxious, and waking up with a hangover I just don't get.

      You do know that not everyone who drinks behaves like that, just like not everyone who eats becomes obese.

      Perhaps you need to get out of your mom's basement once in a while?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a social drinker, but even then I drink very little, mostly just mixing it with soda to make it look like I drink as much as the others, because I don't want my alcohol tolerance to go down.
      I hate pills for pain, so, instead I drink a beer or two, which is usually plenty to put me to sleep on bad nights.

    5. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hit a nerve?

    6. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by neminem · · Score: 1

      Well, waking up with a hangover describes almost everyone who drinks more than a tiny amount, sadly. And alcohol *does* massively lower inhibitions, so while most people might still not be jerks after drinking, it also true that people can be nice enough people while sober because they make themselves be, and way more obnoxious while drunk. (And even more so if you include just being obnoxiously *loud* as being obnoxious, as lowering inhibitions also tends to lower one's ability to control their volume...)

      But if you're blacking out, it means you're doing it wrong. (Which is not to say that I've never done it; I have a couple times. But I wasn't proud of it, nor even happy, and would admit completely that I was doing it wrong - namely, in drinking a lot of something because it tasted good, without ascertaining first just how potent it was.)

    7. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by neminem · · Score: 1

      Then don't drink it? You might not be drinking the right stuff, but you might also just loathe the taste, which is totally your right. I, for instance, can't stand beer, but I know loads of people love it. My girlfriend can't stand the taste of scotch, which I think tastes wonderful.

      And if you don't like your mental functions impaired, then that's your right, too. But some people, myself included, find it fun occasionally. I wouldn't do it all the time - I like being at full mental capacity - but every once in a while it's an enjoyable experience. (But I do wish science could do something about the day-after effects... back in college I never used to get hangovers unless I drank to excess, which I tried to avoid doing. These days I can get one even drinking in moderation.)

    8. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by neminem · · Score: 2

      Presumably the nerve called "not liking people who state incorrect things as fact". That gets on my nerves, too.

    9. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by tibit · · Score: 2

      People who act obnoxious on alcohol are just people who are crypto-obnoxious. Alcohol only exposes their flaw. I wish employers were allowed to do a violent behavior screening where employees must get drunk, and are observed to see if they get violent. I'd definitely not want to hire anyone who gets violent after drinking. It doesn't take much for them to get violent otherwise as well.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    10. Re:I already find alcohol intolerable by minderaser · · Score: 1

      I'm a social drinker, but even then I drink very little, mostly just mixing it with soda to make it look like I drink as much as the others, because I don't want my alcohol tolerance to go down. I hate pills for pain, so, instead I drink a beer or two, which is usually plenty to put me to sleep on bad nights.

      And then after you get off of your high horse about people who chose to drink you might look at some facts that show alcohol interferes with sleep.

      Oh, sorry, didn't mean to interfere with your smugness.

  39. That's nothing new. by Minwee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A product called "Budweiser" has been making tiny amounts of alcohol intolerable to drinkers for years.

    1. Re:That's nothing new. by minderaser · · Score: 1

      A product called "Budweiser" has been making tiny amounts of alcohol intolerable to drinkers for years.

      best comment ever

  40. The Twilight Zone is years ahead of this concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Hellgrammite Method

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KFASt7gDM4

  41. Re:The Twilight Zone is years ahead of this concep by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    awesome. i was thinking the very same thing. it's like a stephen king story.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  42. So this is like anabuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a longer lasting form of anabuse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabuse. I imagine that the injection / longer lasting stuff might make sense in one way: courts will probably offer you a "take this injection twice a year or go to jail". Could be interesting.

  43. Reversal by guynorton · · Score: 1

    What if a 'drug' were discovered which allowed the alcohol intolerant to actually enjoy alcohol? Would this be morally questionable? The market would be huge and as we all know, the market is good at making the morally questionable, morally acceptable.

    1. Re:Reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never met one of these alcohol-intolerants that actually wanted to enjoy alcohol though. Most of them just childishly wonder why anyone would ever drink, or whine that the taste is scary or generalize all drinkers as blacked out hooligans.

  44. Or by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Addictive tendencies could very well manifest in other ways; instead of alcohol, perhaps former addicts will move on to

    Suicide (or murder if this is forced upon them by the State).

  45. Next up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on My Strange Addiction: Acetaldehyde shots

    "hell, I just drink the vial and don't shoot it" said one user.

    Film at 11

  46. That's the future for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Bloomberg's New York, the alcohol vaccine will be mandatory.

  47. Antabuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what Antabuse did. And if I remember correctly, the FDA banned it because people were being killed by a buildup of actelehyde (very similar to formaldehyde).

    Move along folks, nothing new here.

    1. Re:Antabuse by tibit · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong. The FDA didn't ban it.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  48. I'm a drunk and by fiver22 · · Score: 1

    I know there are already drugs that are designed to make people nauseous when they drink. The addictions centre here stopped backing those drugs as too many people were drinking on it. They may even have been pulled off the market -not sure. I think people underestimate the lengths an addict will go to to ingest their drug of choice. When I was drinking I would have done some disgusting things when I was running out of booze.

  49. I picked the wrong week to quit amphetamines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine how pissed off you'd be if somebody stuck this into you at the bus stop?

  50. Re:Won't work - antabuse already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. There is already a drug that does this, and it's been relatively ineffective in treatment.

    http://www.drugs.com/antabuse.html

  51. Calculus already tried this for Captain Haddock. by Bombcar · · Score: 1

    It worked decently well.

  52. This has been around since 1948 by water-vole · · Score: 2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disulfiram is used extensively in Sweden to treat bad drinkers and has been for a very long time. It is called Antabus there.

  53. If only they had a way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to make people feel fat, bloated, and lethargic when they ate too much to prevent over-eating...

    This would surely change the world we live in today! ...oh wait...

    1. Re:If only they had a way... by AcquaCow · · Score: 1

      Oh, why the hell am I never logged in when I post stuff like this, lol...

      --

      up 12 days, 22:30, 2 users, load averages: 993.20, 994.21, 994.56
      *makes note to limit user processes...
  54. Antabuse Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's the difference between this and Antabuse (Disulfiram)?

    1. Re:Antabuse Anyone? by minderaser · · Score: 1

      The difference is that by calling it a "vaccine" (which it is CLEARLY not for anyone who has half a brain) the manufactures enjoy immunity from lawsuits. See here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/22/AR2011022206008.html

      Just watch. Pretty much every drug is going to be marketed as a vaccine.

  55. Hey! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Where's my old freak Drinkypoo?

  56. I call Bullshit by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    TFA has no links to any papers or articles about this supposed "vaccine"

    The research group's web page has no direct reference to any such vaccine.

    What is being hyped is pre-clinical *animal* trials (cf. http://advhealth.com/alcohol-vaccine/) which haven't even begun yet.

    Move along. Nothing to see here. At least not for some time.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  57. Kill it by Roachie · · Score: 1

    Kill it with fire!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  58. ethanol becomes an enzyme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poorly written, not unusual here.

    Ethanol is turned into acetaldehyde by an enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase, and the acetaldehyde is further broken down.

    Accumulation of acetaldehyde is why asians get such red cheeks when they drink. They can take antihistimines to cover it up a bit.

  59. yes ! by Tom · · Score: 1

    Please put that into the water supply.

    I live near a famous street full of bars. The amount of anti-social behaviour and frankly speaking dumbfucks I see over the weekend is enough to make the best man doubt humanity as a species. Most of it, thanks to alcohol.

    I'm sure most of these people are tolerable when they're sober. But what I see of them when they come here is in the "they should have their license to breathe withdrawn" category.

    And that's not even taking into account the drunk driving, alcoholism and other measurable damages to society and individuals.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:yes ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel for you. My wife and I lived two blocks from the strip on south beach. Every Sat and Sunday and a few weekdays with out fail there was some dip shit hollering, or doing drag racing / doughnuts outside our house, loud pipes, bikes, police sirens. So glad to be away from that bullshit.

      Of course we had a kid and moved to the suburbs close to a good school, and now it's the bus drivers warming up in winter in reverse beeping at 6 am that drives me crazy.

      Splatter

  60. Really bad idea by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

    The alcohol flush reaction they refer to isn't just about feeling unpleasant. Yes, people with two copies of the gene for it rarely drink. But those with only one copy (that is, they have some of the enzymes to metabolize acetaldehyde), while less likely to drink, often do so anyway (because they can take it, and they enjoy the feeling or feel socially obligated). And when they do, they raise their risk of esophageal (and I believe a few other cancers) significantly more than someone who drinks the same amount but lacks the flush reaction. Acetaldehyde is highly carcinogenic; most people just get rid of it quickly enough to limit the damage.

    In short: If you give this to alcoholics, a large number of them will tolerate the side-effects and you've just dramatically increased their risk of cancer.

    --
    $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    1. Re:Really bad idea by gagol · · Score: 1

      In short: If you give this to alcoholics, a large number of them will tolerate the side-effects and you've just dramatically increased their risk of cancer.

      Wouldn't it decrease the amount of alcoolism anyway? Not that I would suport it...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  61. Addictive tendencies by betterprimate · · Score: 1

    Addictive tendencies could very well manifest in other ways; instead of alcohol, perhaps former addicts will move on to cigarettes.

    I have never met an alcoholic who wasn't already addicted to cigarettes prior to drinking. Arguably, alcoholism and alcohol abuse can stem from cigarette addiction when cigarettes no longer cut it and leave the user with discontentment.

  62. Better Solution - Baclofen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever hear of Baclofen? This stuff can work wonders for alcoholism.

    See also: The End of My Addiction by Olivier Ameisen.

  63. Idiots? by alexo · · Score: 1

    Idiots have gotten "Alcoholism" classified as a disease, so technically a treatment that immunizes you against alcoholism would be a vaccine in the "one time immunization to a disease" sense.

    At least in the common vernacular. In medical terminology vaccines likely do refer strictly to immunization against virii.

    Virii is not a word.
    Viri is a word, but is the plural of Vir.

  64. You underestimate the usefulness of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many alcoholics do want to stop drinking, but it's a hard thing to do. Not only do they have to not drink right now, but they have to not drink five minutes from now, and five minutes after that, and five minutes after that, and so on, forever. Not drinking is an endless string of decisions not to drink, while drinking again is just one decision that's easy to make. The result is that even those who very much want to stop drinking have a very difficult time about it.

    Imagine, for example, someone offers you a magic button that you can press which will simultaneously deposit a million dollars in your bank account and kill some random person. You might be a moral person and thus not want to push the button, but imagine they follow you around with it constantly for months on end. Are you sure that at some point, after a bad day, with everyone getting on your nerves, that you wouldn't in a moment of desperation say "fuck the world" and hit the button?

    Now imagine the same situation slightly reversed. The person offers you a similar button, but for this one to give you the million dollars and kill someone, all you have to do is NOT push the button for 30 consecutive days. ...and, again, they follow you around with it constantly. Even if you're an immoral person, and don't really care about anyone else, you might still have a good day now and then when you decide that random people don't deserve to die.

    A vaccine like this would similarly reverse the situation for alcoholics. Even an alcoholic who only kind of wants to stop drinking could probably convince themselves to get a shot once a month. True, it wouldn't do anything to help those who truly do not want to stop drinking, but it's hard to imagine anyone who is truly an alcoholic (by definition, having their alcoholism negatively impact their life) who doesn't, for at least a few minutes a month, think that perhaps they should quit drinking.

    1. Re:You underestimate the usefulness of this. by icebike · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure its necessary to postulate melodramatic scenarios involving killing other people and millions of dollars.
      If there was a point there, is was at best a stretch.

      This isn't the first drug that does this very same thing on the market. Look up Antabuse (Disulfiram). It has not been terribly successful. Even among those volunteering for the treatment.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:You underestimate the usefulness of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried Disulfiram, it is sold OTC here in Thailand, one pill works for about 3 days - I get burning sensation on a face and nausea shortly after a shot, it really prevents drinking. Unfortunately it also mess up with ritalin and coke - I'm getting overly nervous, so I can not use it - no drinking and no speed for 3 days is too much of a boredom for me. Interesting if this vaccine have similar side effects.

  65. I'll take a shot at not having a hangover by stoploss · · Score: 1

    Dehydration is definitely a major contributor to hangover. However, it isn't the entire picture. The next two major contributing factors to hangover (or other deleterious effects) are:

    1) Hyponatremia (which can lead to potomania, whether you are drinking beer or liquor), and
    2) Vitamin B deficiency, particularly B1 and B12 (I personally use this, because high doses of water-soluble vitamins doesn't cause any issue). Note Wernicke's encephalopathy.

    ...so, ensure your drinks have a positive sodium balance for what you're losing, and backstop your vitamin B's.

    Applying these two approaches have effectively eliminated any hangover I would have expected to experience (aside from being tired, but that may be attributed to staying up until 3 AM—drinking or not). It has worked well for me for almost two years now.

    Also, ensuring you consume adequate protein may help to forestall liver damage; I prefer to err on the side of high-protein intake.

  66. "Cures"? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    All of these "vaccines" to cure addictions concern me. Thankfully I don't think any of them have been massively effective & I can see the benefits for a small portion of the population....... But. I can just kind of thing going downhill REAL fast. What would have happened if these kinds of things had been available during the "Temperance Movement" (the people who brought us prohibition). I imagine many temperance organizations (Churches, Woman's Groups, etc) would have held "vaccination drives" where they would have mutilated a significant portion of a generation of Americans. The same goes for the current attempts at Marijuana, Cocaine, and other "vaccines" currently being tested, if they attain significant effectiveness I have little doubt that there will be a push by some groups to have children & repeat offenders coerced into being "treated". Its a sad state in our society that we all to often attack the symptoms of problems (crime, drug use, violence, etc) instead of their causes (poverty, lack of opportunities, desperation, mental illness).

  67. Naughty, naughty by servognome · · Score: 1

    Short term solution, the droogs will just return

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  68. Don't post/share what you don't understand /facepa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was the worst "science writeup" I have read in ages. Acetaldehyde is not an enzyme but a molecule. That molecule is produced by the liver alcohol dehydrogenase from ethanol. The enzyme that breaks Acetaldehyde down before it falls apart into all kinds of nasty side products is Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase.
    And creating an immune reaction against Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase would sure cause hangovers - as it would mean the cell starts attacking every liver cell that produces that enzyme.
    With horrible results.

  69. a drug to do this by spitzig · · Score: 1

    There's a drug that does this. The paper mentions that the drug requires the patient to cooperate(regularly take the drug). Sometimes patients take the drug as part of rehab, somewhat willingly. BUT, knowing alcohol will make them feel sick, they still get drunk.

  70. better idea by fazey · · Score: 1

    Wouldnt it be better to create a pill or injection that allowed you to immediately sober up so you can drive? Why would anyone want to knowingly vaccinate themselves with this, and not be able to properly break down alcohol?

  71. I would give that shot to people who are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Passed out drunk.

  72. this is NOT a vaccine by minderaser · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, but doesn't anyone realize that this is not a vaccine? Someone, PLEASE, look up the definition of vaccine.

  73. Summary doesn't know what enzyme is by Kurofuneparry · · Score: 1
    It uses enzyme when it means substrate. The enzymes make the changes, they are not the things changed.

    ...idiot....

    --
    ...... and idiots rule the world....
  74. Give it to everybody by Beardmonster · · Score: 1

    ... if it works, that is. That would save 2.5 millions lives yearly.

  75. Clockwork Orange meets biotech by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    That's getting a little creepy.

  76. IT might not work right by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Alcoholics drink alcohol in the morning to minimize the effect of acetaldehyde, so why won't this "vaccine" make things worse?

  77. cysteine is the cofactor+b6 b9 b12, and b1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you need to take cysteine. or possibly NAC (nacetyl-cysteine just more bioavail, turns into cysteine and probably not work paying for, just buy a kg a cysteine powder.. if you look you'll find it for $50 and it will last a long time), associated interchangeable aminoacids like methionine may help (there has been discussions to add this to paracetamol to prevent liver damage) ... cysteine is the cofactor which is needed by the enzyme that degrades the acetaldehyde ... almost certainly you have enough enzyme but it cant do its job because generally as we age our cysteine cycle blocks up and degrades... homocysteine builds up (a cardio risk factor) .. etc.. read about the cysteine cycle on wiki.. defo do this if nothing else. because basically you cant just take tonnes of cysteine because it may all just end up as homocysteine ... you need to keep the bodys own cysteine cycle running well.. so the b6 b9 and b12 are v important. and TMG which drives a parallel (usually minior) methylation pathway can also help reconvert homocysteine.

    trimethylglycine is also able to drive the cysteine cycle and is used to treat genetic homocysteinuria .. also b9 b12 and b6 will help.

    TMG is high in beetroot (was called betain cause it was isolated from beets), but actually even higher in quinoa and spinach..

    also thiamine is depleted and helps if you drink..

    off the top of my head, when mice are are given the LD50 of ethanol 50% die (duh), when given together with cysteine ~80 survive and wit cysteine and B1 thiamine given virtually all survive :P .. its weird,, when i started trying taking cysteine regularly at first i thought it was like i didnt feel alcohol didnt affect me the same, like i wasnt getting as drunk or it felt different. then i realised i was associating the sick feeling of the acetaldehyde with drunkenness. without it it feels cleaner.

    cheers

  78. aminoacids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its almost certainly particular aminoacids in the egg yolk.

    in fact i will bet that its cysteine. which is the cofactor that lets this enzyme function. so for people with a functioning enzyme its probably not the case that as the age they have less of the enzyme (although this is possible) but more likely their cysteine cycle is blocking/slowing and they have more homocysteine and not enough cysteine.

    good way to deplete your cysteine too (drinking)

    you need cysteine for glutathione so its no minor issue. b9 b12 b6, and trimethylglycine will all help regenerate cysteine from homocysteine.

    intake of cysteine / or nac (more bioavail, but probably not worth the cost) may work short term, but long term you want to get your cycle functioning so as not to simply accumulate homocysteine which is a cardio risk factor..

    please read about the cysteine cycle on wiki
    cheers :P

  79. This will be forced on children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This vaccine will be forced on minors in religious families who oppose the consumption of alcohol. Then when these kids are adults, they won't be able to choose to consume alcohol since they will get the horrible hangovers.

  80. Acetaldehyde addicts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always though my alcoholism was due to my addiction to acetaldehyde and acetic acid, not alcohol per se.

    When I swapped out booze for the funky cold Modena, all was right with my world.

  81. Hugh Pickes is the new Roland Piquepaille by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    in turn is degraded into another enzyme.

    Don't think so.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  82. This already exists: Antabuse by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    This is none-news. Antabuse was invented almost 100 years ago and does exactly the same thing as this "vaccine."

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  83. "feeling terrible" doesn't stop people by gannebraemorr · · Score: 1

    My Mom had pancreatitis and "felt terrible" every time she drank. Her doctor told her, "not another drop". Neither stopped her. Only death due to drinking did.

    --
    http://gannebraemorr.com/lol/
  84. Still alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a subject to be dealt with humor. I'm alive after thirty year addiction. It, addiction, will be replaced with other substances without help. Just a thought.

  85. "Gookification" of western peoples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this vaccine also impair the one so receiving the ability to reason as an individual, or will the recipient start behaving like those in "anthill and beehive" cultures?

    Introducing InstantGook®!~