Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Acknowledges Ctrl+Alt+Del Was a Mistake

theodp writes "If he'd had his druthers, Bill Gates told a Harvard audience, Ctrl+Alt+Del would never have seen the light of day. However, an IBM keyboard designer didn't want to give Microsoft a single button to start things up, and thus the iconic three-finger-salute was born."

439 of 665 comments (clear)

  1. There you have it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even bill gates does not approve of Ctrl+Alt+Del

    1. Re:There you have it. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      It's the usual revisionist drivel from Bill. Ctrl+Alt+Del wasn't about starting the computer. It was about forcing the computer to stop and then start again from scratch when it became so hooped because the operating system was no longer was operating.

      It wasn't IBM's job to make this process easier/faster for the end-user to do.

      It was Bill's job to make this process unnecessary.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Re:Redundant keys by HaZardman27 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I find that at least I use both of the shift keys, unlike the right Ctrl, Alt, and Windows keys.

    --
    Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  3. XT was a mistake by ruir · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if we start thinking in what was wrong building a computer with 25 years technology then we would lost count of the mistakes. If it weren't for the backing of IBM, it would been an instant market failure.

    1. Re:XT was a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Could you tell me what was wrong with it? It served me well for years.

    2. Re:XT was a mistake by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not the XT, but some food for thought:

      Back when IBM was planning their original personal computer (note that "PC" used to mean any personal computer, but the IBM-PC's success hijacked the name), one design they considered was based on the 801, an early RISC processor about 45 times more powerful than the 8088 they ended up using, and their own modern operating system instead of Microsoft's junk... yeah, that's no typo, FOURTY FIVE TIMES more powerful: the 8088 @ 5 MHz did a paltry 0.33 MIPS, while the 801 did 15 MIPS.

      Think about it, the PC started with the wrong foot. A broken, twisted, crippled, atrophied foot. How much technological progress did we lose because we had to waste time overcoming the limitations of this super shitty beginning?

    3. Re:XT was a mistake by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much technological progress did we lose because we had to waste time overcoming the limitations of this super shitty beginning?

      Hard to say. Because: Its also true the XT they shipped was built of mostly COTS parts. There is no reason to think a much bigger project the 801 based machine with some operating system that would have to either be written or ported from 390 or elsewhere would have ever made it out the door before getting canceled.

      I don't even know your more powerful machine would have been successful; honestly IBMs experience with Operating Systems and interfaces at the time would not have translated well to home users and SMBs. MS-DOS was something motivated people could figure out on their own with manual.

      IBM would have had to build something that did not use JCL would would have been radical for them at the time. Because there aint no way people would have picked that up.

      So its very likely we would have never had a more or less 'open' PC platform at all, it would have all been the very proprietary 8-bit and early 16-bit stuff in the space from Ti, C=, and others.

      We might still be well behind where we are today.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:XT was a mistake by Megane · · Score: 1

      Actually, the real problem was the screwed-up segment architecture of the 8086 forced memory to be used in 64K chunks. In my opinion, that set back the PC industry by ten years as users tried to deal with the infamous 640K limit, made worse by the design of the '286.

      They were supposedly also talking with Motorola when deciding on what chip to use for the PC. Stories vary, but it seems as though they wanted the 68008 (the 8-bit bus version of the 68K) which wasn't going to be ready in time. According to one story I heard, Motorola wasn't willing to commit to their chip being ready on IBM's schedule, though it did get released in time after all. According to Wikipedia, the 68008 was released in 1982, so the timing is right.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:XT was a mistake by msauve · · Score: 2

      We didn't lose a thing. We'd be exactly where we are today - with software bloat and inefficiency expanding to consume any increase in hardware power. PC-DOS booted faster on that 0.33 MIPS machine than Windoze 8 does on a 300,000x faster processor today.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:XT was a mistake by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the 801 CPU wouldn't have cost any more than the 8086/8, right? Or consumed any more power? Or needed any special, non-commodity parts?

      You could have just as easily criticized them for not using the System/38 CPU, right? 48-bit addressing!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:XT was a mistake by operagost · · Score: 1

      The IBM PC came out in 1981, so it was too late.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:XT was a mistake by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, it didn't. The original PC had no hard disk. The XT came with a 10 MB hard disk that wasn't much better, with 85 ms seeks and transfer rates of maybe 200 KB/s.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:XT was a mistake by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Even when introducing the PC, IBM and others made engineering workstations. They cost 5 figures+ and were never widely adopted.

      Still you are right. Perhaps if IBM had stayed out, later the Amiga might have seen wider adoption in business.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:XT was a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're ignoring the single most important concern IBM had when they were designing the PC: CP/M, which was the operating system of choice for smaller computers of the day. Gates' task was to create an OS that had the look and feel of CP/M, to be run on hardware that could also run CP/M if PC-DOS (as MS-DOS was originally called) didn't catch on. The 801 would have required an elaborate and expensive solution to be able to run CP/M (poorly), which the 8088 architecture only would need a reasonably priced daughterboard to run CP/M natively. Speaking as someone who bought an original PC, a big selling point was that daughterboard-- it was an insurance plan.

    11. Re:XT was a mistake by msauve · · Score: 1

      You must be a young-un. Having a hard drive had nothing to do with it.

      PC-DOS originally came on mini-floppy disc. And yes, it did boot faster than Win8 from a SSD.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    12. Re:XT was a mistake by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      PC-DOS booted faster on that 0.33 MIPS machine than Windoze 8 does on a 300,000x faster processor today.

      I see your point, and as hyperbole it works, but it actually is not true. I was there, I booted PC-DOS computers, I boot computers to Windows 8 today, and while it's true that today's hardware is radically more sophisticated, your point is false. I can boot an Acer tablet running Windows 8 in about half the time it took to boot a PC-DOS computer from floppy disks.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    13. Re:XT was a mistake by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Even when introducing the PC, IBM and others made engineering workstations. They cost 5 figures+ and were never widely adopted.

      Still you are right. Perhaps if IBM had stayed out, later the Amiga might have seen wider adoption in business.

      The Atari ST was no slouch either and more of a boring architecture that was more palatable to business users. I actually saw several businesses such as limo companies using them in the late 80's w/ mono hi-rez screens. They also didn't have the obnoxious flickering.

      The Amiga was more like an Atari 800XL on steroids. Very cool machine but I never saw businesses buy them for mundane tasks like desktop publishing or word processing. On the other hand, Atari had a MegaST package and a laser printer that was low cost and high quality.

      The ST should have been an IBM PC killer and probably could have been had they not stagnated and kept up the pace with rapid PC development.

    14. Re:XT was a mistake by msauve · · Score: 1

      You can boot an Acer tablet into Windows 8 in 6 seconds?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re:XT was a mistake by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      MS-DOS was something motivated people could figure out on their own with manual.

      DOS had a manual? I remember all of us abusing it with no manual at all. Just going for it. Screw it up, and the OS reinstall was no more than a reboot away. When OSs were installed on HDs and took time to re-install (I've installed Win 3.0 from 5.25" floppy, and Win95 from 3.5" floppy), you dreaded the stare-and wait for next disc message, so you played less.

    16. Re:XT was a mistake by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The 801 was based on Motorola emitter coupled logic, and would have required memory capable of performing as fast as the processor. Figure a computer the size of a desk, with several loud fans to remove the 500 to 1000 watts I think it would draw.

      Economical computers pretty much had to rely on n-MOS CPUs like the 8080, 8088, 6502 and Z80. From a standpoint of affordable hardware, it's hard to imagine anyone producing a home computer with even 2X the performance of historical hardware at any time in the last 35 years.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    17. Re:XT was a mistake by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Clock speed != power

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    18. Re:XT was a mistake by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Damnit...I hit the button before writing my entire post. Basically, I'm glad you included the MIPS, because as many of us recall from the PC wars, companies were constantly advertising their clock rates, and the masses were buying it as a valid indication of more powerful machines.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    19. Re:XT was a mistake by ruir · · Score: 1

      They build it to be CPM/compatible and cheap, with text mode and a 16-bit processor with an 8-bit data bus, to use off-the-shelf components, TTL logic and outdated hardware. i.e. to be build in the cheap. That is also why they were big boxes btw. The BIOS/OS was also ridiculously simple, didn't do much. In an era the competition was running all graphic operating systems and multitasking and specialised co-processors. Where Motorola was starting pumping processors with 64 bit instructions. When you already had home systems built with custom ASICs to cut on the number of processors and gain performance. The 640KB limit, and associated problems with it just to be able to run directly CPM/software, still plague the Intel consumer family to this very day. The operating system didn't do anything besides providing CPM/compatibility and managing the storage, diskettes, and latter mapping the diskette operation to the hard drive, also in a time you had far much more operating systems for academic and home use. This nonsense that got widespread due to you have to be compatible myth sold so well by IBM, set us back in CSI science for at least 25 years.

    20. Re:XT was a mistake by ruir · · Score: 1

      The original ones had manual, I remember handling them at school. But they were very simple.

    21. Re:XT was a mistake by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      My recollection of the whole Amiga/ST scene was that accessories tended to be expensive, had complex interfaces and tended to be only available from the original manufacturer. The PC came along with it's ISA and that was that. It was all foreseeable if you knew where to look. Part of the reason for the success of the Spectrum (and before it the ZX81) in the UK was its cheap and easy-to-interface-with accessory port.

      Spiritually, the Amiga was the successor to the C64 and the Atari ST to the Spectrum (shame that Sinclair self-imploded, really) and should have blazed into the future. I remember when all the shelves were Amiga and Atari games with maybe a few PC games hidden away in a dark corner. Locking down your hardware, ultimately, is self-destructive.

    22. Re:XT was a mistake by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      My recollection of the whole Amiga/ST scene was that accessories tended to be expensive, had complex interfaces and tended to be only available from the original manufacturer. The PC came along with it's ISA and that was that.

      The Atari ST had a cartridge port and ACSI (could be used as SCSI with an adapter). The MegaST had a DMA port as well that was used for the Atari Laser printer. The TT had VME. The Amiga had a couple different buses including ISA.

      For a while an ST w/ Spectre GCR was cheaper than a mac. You could emulate a PC with an add-on box too that wasn't super expensive.

      It was all foreseeable if you knew where to look. Part of the reason for the success of the Spectrum (and before it the ZX81) in the UK was its cheap and easy-to-interface-with accessory port.

      Yeah, because people really spend a lot of time expanding their modern PC's. Those days are dead. It was also only necessary because the PC sucked out of the box and had to be expanded to have any respectable sound, networking or graphics capabilities... or a real HDD interface in the early days.

      Spiritually, the Amiga was the successor to the C64 and the Atari ST to the Spectrum (shame that Sinclair self-imploded, really) and should have blazed into the future. I remember when all the shelves were Amiga and Atari games with maybe a few PC games hidden away in a dark corner. Locking down your hardware, ultimately, is self-destructive.

      Spiritually, the Amiga has NOTHING to do with the C64. In fact, the Amiga is more like the spiritual successor to the Atari 800. In fact, it was designed by a lot of the same team. The ST is actually much more C64-like than the Amiga and was designed after Tramiel bought Atari Computer. Most machines weren't incredibly locked down.... it's just that 1,000 companies didn't get away with cloning it rampantly so the margins weren't there and as the PC dropped in price it made sense for folks to have the same machine at home and at work. And Win95 made it almost mac-like to use. SVGA helped make games suck less.

      The only machines I can think of where the bus was so complex it was ridiculous were the early macs (NUBUS) or Sun SBUS-based machines. SGI was funky too.

    23. Re:XT was a mistake by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because people really spend a lot of time expanding their modern PC's. Those days are dead. It was also only necessary because the PC sucked out of the box and had to be expanded to have any respectable sound, networking or graphics capabilities... or a real HDD interface in the early days.

      The lesson has been learned and we currently have easy-to-use interfaces in the form of USB and PCIe and others. Sure, these are more complex than ISA and simple buses but they are standards and the state-of-the-art has advanced to where these are fairly trivial to implement with off-the-shelf parts.

    24. Re:XT was a mistake by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      USB.... you mean the bus inspired by Atari's SIO bus (400/800/XL/XE) for easy connection of a wide variety of peripherals from external storage to printers and modems? It worked well. Bigger connector with a few more pins but still pretty awesome. PBI was pretty advanced too.

      If the PC wasn't cloned (IBM wasn't happy about this BTW) and adopted by businesses due to dBase II and a few other killer business apps ported from CP/M-land..... it would be long dead.

  4. So why continue it... by nschubach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once they got the "Windows Key", why did they continue using the Ctrl + Alt + Delete?

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    1. Re:So why continue it... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Because not everyone has one?
      This keyboard does not. In fact I don't think I own any that do.

    2. Re:So why continue it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because accidentally pressing the windows key in the middle of a game would shut down an entire computer instead of momentarily piss off a gamer.

    3. Re:So why continue it... by robmv · · Score: 2

      Because people would cry with petitions like "Give me my Ctrl + Alt + Delete back!, don't change things that works!" and everything your hear when someone try to do something different

    4. Re:So why continue it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because they have branched off to different uses, C-A-D was already ingrained.
      I don't see the issue with the 3 finger salute. You are not going to hit it accidentally unlike the windows key (or any other unique key). Being near impossible to hit accidentally it can be given override priority.

    5. Re:So why continue it... by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      That's why I love my Logitech G11... it has a "game switch" that basically only serves to disable the Win key.

    6. Re:So why continue it... by jonathanjespersen · · Score: 2

      The article is only stating about using Ctrl+Alt+Del to log into Windows, not restart the computer. Changing the Windows login command to a single key (even the Windows key) would not have the effect you describe.

    7. Re:So why continue it... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I don't use windows regularly, but does Win 8 now require it?

    8. Re:So why continue it... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I googled and it appears Crtl-Esc replaces it when needed. Which seems pretty bad for all your folks that don't move Ctrl to where FSM intends it to be.

    9. Re:So why continue it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, CTRL-ESC is still the Windows key just like it always was. Newer keyboards with a separate Windows key can still use CTRL-ESC just fine.

    10. Re:So why continue it... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      When we used to play Decent 2 on Windows NT and Windows 95 we used to remove the "Windows" Keys from the keyboard as you somehow jumped out of DOS (the game ran in a kind of DOS or something other awkward) but you did not come into windows. So you could not switch back. Sometimes Alt-Tab worked, but often not. Was annoying like hell.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:So why continue it... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Because not everyone has one?

      In that case they could have still used both Ctrl-Alt-Del and Windows key for the function.

    12. Re:So why continue it... by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Nope. You can log in to Win8 by tapping the space bar. For additional security you can enable Ctrl-Alt-Del login by starting "netplwiz.exe" and going to the Advanced tab.

    13. Re:So why continue it... by jones_supa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank god we are at least past the era in which pressing the Win key or Alt-Tabbing in a game would jam the whole operating system.

    14. Re:So why continue it... by geek · · Score: 1

      Because people would cry with petitions like "Give me my Ctrl + Alt + Delete back!, don't change things that works!" and everything your hear when someone try to do something different

      So instead they created metro which made everyone cry with petitions................ Your logic doesn't hold. MS could have easily done away with ctrl+alt+del but didn't.

    15. Re:So why continue it... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The point of using control-alt-delete is that it's a key combination that can not be caught by any userspace process that does not have a special permission. This means that it's impossible to spoof the login screen on Windows without already having compromised the kernel. It doesn't matter what the key combination is, as long as it's one that is not delivered by the normal keypress event delivery mechanisms. Control-alt-delete is a reasonable choice, because no application author is likely to complain that they can't use this shortcut combination.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:So why continue it... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Because some keyboards don't have the Windows key. Also some people like myself intentionally get keyboards without it. Why? Because it's located right next to the other meta keys and it's too easy to fat-finger it. Plugging in a keyboard without a Windows key is right up there with disabling mouse gestures when I set up a box. Those are also too easy to inadvertently trigger.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    17. Re:So why continue it... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I am not completely convinced about it either.

    18. Re:So why continue it... by jonathanjespersen · · Score: 1

      I agree. I was only addressing the statement about accidentally shutting down the computer.

    19. Re:So why continue it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe its the fact that nothing can intercept CAD except the OS?

    20. Re:So why continue it... by Maria_Celeste · · Score: 1

      Once they got the "Windows Key", why did they continue using the Ctrl + Alt + Delete?

      Because it's an automatic/involuntary movement for Windows users. It's no different than pressing an elevator button. You don't think about it.

      --
      The world is a stage, but the play is badly cast.
    21. Re:So why continue it... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      I've never understood the "additional security" argument for CAD. Bollocks if you ask me.

      The theory was that nefarious actors would boot DOS from a floppy on public machines and run a simple program that would spoof the Windows login screen, thereby collecting account names and passwords. If people had to press Ctl+Alt+Del first, it would force any DOS impostor to reboot instead. Of course, that still wouldn't protect from a bad guy who was able to put more sophisticated software on the floppy.

    22. Re:So why continue it... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It's something to do with people putting up fake screens to impersonate Windows Login.

      If you use CAD then fake windows will be minimized, or the task manager will pop up, or something....

      Similar to Flash/Silverlight not being allowed to play fullscreen video on second monitors - some amazingly unlikely security scenario means we all have to suffer.

      --
      No sig today...
    23. Re:So why continue it... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      You're so horribly opposed to a specific branding of the Meta key that you refuse to even THINK about buying any keyboard made in the past 15 years?

      Nope. I'm just horribly opposed to not typing on something that isn't a Model-M.

      --
      No sig today...
    24. Re:So why continue it... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah and it's quite strange/stupid for Microsoft to change the behaviour from reboot to login[1].

      Linux and FreeBSD kept the ctrl-alt-del for reboot concept.

      This conflict in behaviour can be a problem in a mixed KVM environment where you have Windows and Linux/FreeBSD systems.

      When a windows administrator sees a blank screen and tries to log in they may press ctrl-alt-del. Which by default on some Windows configurations/versions brings up the login screen. BUT on most Linux/FreeBSD default installs reboots the machine...

      And so in some cases I've configured FreeBSD or Linux to not reboot on ctrl-alt-del.

      [1] Disable it sure, but ctrl-alt-del to login has probably caused more problems than it solved in real-life.

      --
    25. Re:So why continue it... by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 5, Informative

      I use the Start key all of the time. Seriously. I use it in the following manner, essentially as a keyboard shortcut and linux holdover:

      *Start* (type some keys) (enter) to launch a program.
      Frequent uses include "cal" for Calculator, "not" for notepad, "wor" for Word, and "add or remove" for the Program Manager

      *Start* (# key) to bring up window #.
      One uses include Start+1 (Currently set to the Google App Launcher) (then used as the first example)
      Another is Start+2, which is always my E-mail application (across multiple computers)

      *Start*+R to bring up the "Run" dialog
      Frequent uses from the Run dialog are "dxdiag", "cmd", and "regedit"

      *Start*+D to "Show Desktop"
      Admittedly used less now with the prevalence of two monitors

      *Start*+E to bring up Explorer
      Used ALL THE TIME

      *Start*+CTRL+TAB to bring up a listing of all windows
      Admittedly, this is mapped to a StrokeIt Gesture shortcut (but the point stands)

      *Start*+DirectionalArrow (Up/Down/Left/Right)
      Used to move, maximize, and restore a window. Try it, Start+Left will put a window at half of your left screen. SUPER USEFUL. USED ALL THE TIME. EXTRA POINTS ON A BIG MONITOR. This is the fastest way to move windows to a second monitor.

      I probably do 90% of these every day. I use the Start key as much as CTRL and ALT.

    26. Re:So why continue it... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Um, no it isn't.

      --
      No sig today...
    27. Re:So why continue it... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I'll admit to it: I am so horribly opposed to a specific branding of the Meta key that I refuse to even THINK about buying any keyboard with a 'Windows' key.

      I love my Model Ms, and the couple of newer Unicomps I also have, and don't enjoy typing on anything else.

    28. Re:So why continue it... by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, that's not it. It's not meant to protect the local machine, but the network. If you have local access to hardware, you control the machine. Assuming that the machine is sufficiently secured-- the OS cannot be replaced or bypassed-- a user could still harvest credentials by simply running a user-mode program that emulated a logon screen. CTRL-ALT-DEL cannot be trapped by a user-mode program, thereby avoiding this security issue.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    29. Re:So why continue it... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      But why did they choose that silly key chord for Windows in the first place? Because it reboots DOS.

      If not for that "feature", they could have used a more reasonable choice for a non-trappable key in their new OS, such as SysRq.

    30. Re:So why continue it... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I think the newer Unicomps have Windows keys on them. They also have USB connection (no bad thing) and come in space-saving sizes (the "Ultra Classic" looks interesting: http://pckeyboard.com/page/category/UltraClassic )

      I might look into them when this keyboard wears out.

      --
      No sig today...
    31. Re:So why continue it... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The problem now is that when a game freezes you can't Win key or alt-tab out and kill it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:So why continue it... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      That is still true, but Ctrl-Alt-Del seems to work almost always these days (to bring up the menu from where you can start Task Manager and then kill the game).

    33. Re:So why continue it... by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      That's why I love my Logitech G11... it has a "game switch" that basically only serves to disable the Win key.

      I would think doing something to caps lock would also be part of a "game mode" for a keyboard. I'm not sure what it should do to caps lock, but it should do something. Normally, you map w, s, a & d to be forward, backward, left and right respectively. Located right next to the a key, caps lock is prime real estate but it's often worse than useless. Rarely, if ever, is the caps lock key used in the default controls. In some games, you can't even map to the stupid thing (unless you change its function in the OS itself). Worse yet, if the game offers in-game chat, you sometimes hit it while moving leftwards, hit whatever button is used for chat and then try to type and end up sending out messages in all caps. Yeah, occasionally you hit the Windows button by mistake with your palms. I see the need for the Windows key, but why do we need two? Don't answer the run command because you could still invoke that one-handed by using the index finger and pinkie of your right hand. Rather than having a keyboard with a game switch it might be best if they simply made keyboards that only had a Windows button in the bottom right and maybe put the caps lock right there with it. (Even

    34. Re:So why continue it... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Early EverQuest did that deliberately to stop people from playing around with debuggers and cheat bot programs.

      People figured out the RAM location of things like the bard's speed run variable and would set it to 255 and go rocketting across the landscape.

      They learned a hell of a lot which is why almost everything is done server-side. That's less of an issue with hih speed connections now. Before you would have to have the client do a request, get approval, off you go at server speed, when a simpler client just told the server how fast you were moving, have a nice day hackers.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    35. Re:So why continue it... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      You must be new to Earth.

      This is known as "How Windows Works".

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    36. Re:So why continue it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      START+SHIFT+ARROW KEY
      Move to second a monitor to the same place on a second monitor scaled appropriately.

    37. Re:So why continue it... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      There's probably some clicky-click way to access the same window. :) Maybe through Control Panel or some policy editor, I don't know.

    38. Re:So why continue it... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      However this key combo was chosen long before there was a Windows.

    39. Re:So why continue it... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, coming from IBM, Ctrl+Alt+Del is a lot better than Shift+PF4.

    40. Re:So why continue it... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ya, this NEVER happens to me anymore in Windows 8. No more than once or twice a day anyway.

    41. Re:So why continue it... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Hae? What is it you want to express?
      No, I'm not new on earth, and no, I don't realy use windows except as a shell to the email client and web browser I'm forced to use. For the rest I use cygwin and usually I'm lucky enough to work on the host directly.
      Well my current job is doing CI on a SoC ... so I only use Windows to run a Firefox and a Lotus Notes client.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    42. Re:So why continue it... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      I might look into them when this keyboard wears out.

      A model-M can wear out? Just how many people do you have to bludgeon to death with it for that to happen?

    43. Re:So why continue it... by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      I have one, but I covered it with one of those fancy Tux stickers. It's working real good right now, when I push it, it does nothing; heaven forbid it opened any Windows.

    44. Re:So why continue it... by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Apparently in Ubuntu it's now RALT-SYSRQ-K which I haven't tried. But ALT+SYSRQ+R-E-I-S-U-B works wonders during a hard lockup where CTRL+ALT+F2 doesn't function.

    45. Re:So why continue it... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I use start+D and start+R mostly, largely in part due to the fact that they're on the same side of the keyboard I hit all my controls keys (left side). I don't use it for anything else.

      I never do Start+type. Too much work to go from the start button back to the home keys. Frequently-used programs (including explorer) go into my quick launch area. Yes, there's a show desktop button there too, but start+D is faster, and I don't risk bringing up yet another new window when what I really want is the desktop. Something like cmd or mounting drives I run with start+R and then hit the up/down arrows until I get to the command I need/want.

      Oh yeah, I also use it to bring up the start menu. This especially when the taskbar refuses to unhide itself, even when my mouse is on the bottom edge of the screen.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    46. Re:So why continue it... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Not really, as you can't use the Windows key shortcuts that way, which are even more handy in Windows 8 as a lot of that stuff still works but but has been removed from the user interface or buried in the start screen.

    47. Re:So why continue it... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that laptop has a problem with where my wrist is going to rest relative to the WASD keys and the touchpad. Also, I wouldn't want to play a game that requires heavy use of the function keys on that laptop either.

    48. Re:So why continue it... by Scoldog · · Score: 1

      Still happening these days. Fallout New Vegas, I'm looking at you!

      --
      This space for rent
    49. Re:So why continue it... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Get a "Das Keyboard" with the black keys. They have windows keys, but as all the keys are black, there is no logo. And they have a built-in USB hub. The mechanism in the keys is awesomely awesomeful.

    50. Re:So why continue it... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you're being snarky, AC, or genuinely guessing, but you've nailed it. The intention back then was to avoid "fake login" keyloggers, basically bogus programs which would pop up on startup and display a phony login screen to capture login credentials.

    51. Re:So why continue it... by Curate · · Score: 1

      Apparently in Ubuntu it's now RALT-SYSRQ-K which I haven't tried. But ALT+SYSRQ+R-E-I-S-U-B works wonders during a hard lockup where CTRL+ALT+F2 doesn't function.

      Another useful one is ALT+SYSRQ+R-E-I-S-E-R which kills the current process.

    52. Re:So why continue it... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      It emulates tapping the windows key. You can't chord it though. Ctrl-esc-L does not lock the screen, for example.

    53. Re:So why continue it... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I pressed that and now the passenger seat is missing from my car.

    54. Re:So why continue it... by ukemike · · Score: 1

      *Start*+DirectionalArrow (Up/Down/Left/Right) Used to move, maximize, and restore a window. Try it, Start+Left will put a window at half of your left screen. SUPER USEFUL. USED ALL THE TIME. EXTRA POINTS ON A BIG MONITOR. This is the fastest way to move windows to a second monitor.

      I never knew this one. I tried it just a moment ago and I swear the heavens opened up and I heard the angels singing for just a moment. Bless you.

      --
      -- QED
  5. What about the Windows key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Was it the same IBM keyboard designer that came up with the Windows and menu keys? They seem to "start" more things than CTRL+ALT+DEL.

    1. Re:What about the Windows key? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure neither of those came from an IBM keyboard designer and you're off by several decades anyway.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:What about the Windows key? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yeah this IBM keyboard has neither. I bet it predates that AC though.

  6. Re:Redundant keys by Sockatume · · Score: 2

    You're supposed to use the left shift key when typing a character on the right, and the right shift key when typing a character on the left. Speeds things up considerably.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  7. Re:Redundant keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Basically, Gates didn't have a say in the matter. I personally never understood what the big deal was about the TFS. I'm sure it sucks for the handicapped but aside from that it's no big deal.

  8. ADB by bearded_yak · · Score: 2

    I loved the power key on the old Apple ADB keyboards. I didn't enjoy the operating system back then, but I remember wishing PC's had such a key.

    1. Re:ADB by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 1

      I loved the power key on the old Apple ADB keyboards. I didn't enjoy the operating system back then, but I remember wishing PC's had such a key.

      All of my PCs had a "power key." More than one depending on how many power strips were between it and the wall socket :)

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    2. Re:ADB by NJRoadfan · · Score: 5, Informative

      PCs were held back by the AT standard power supply, which used a hard wired power switch. Only a handful of OEMs used "soft" power switches. IBM was one of the first using it in their PS/1 machines back in 1992 or so. Apple started using them even earlier. It wasn't until ATX style power supplies that soft power switches became universal on PCs around 1998 or so. The introduction of ACPI really pushed for it since it needed full control of system power.

    3. Re:ADB by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Yea, but those "keys" didn't produce a satisfying "BONG!" when you pressed them to turn the PC on.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    4. Re:ADB by bored · · Score: 1

      And with the introduction of ACPI and soft power on the PC was also the introduction of the PC that needed to by physically unplugged or have the batteries removed to power it off.

      It also introduced the PC that sucks down 3-7 watts of power even when turned off.

      BTW: I had to removed power again just a few days ago, bmc went crazy on a HP and holding the power button down/etc failed to power it off. Had to reach behind the rack and disconnect mains power. I've seen laptops do it to, linux or something makes some EFI call hits a bug and boom the system won't power off without the battery being removed.

      Mostly because some asshole wants to be able to power on his PC via the keyboard? Or sometimes even via the LAN. I myself do this, but outside of wake from standby, i'm pretty convinced using an external device is a better option. I still have an external smart power switch to power off my monitors/etc when the PC goes off. Saves me ~25 watts because of all the USB devices with wall warts and monitors attached to my desktop.

  9. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Because Ctrl-Alt-Delete is non-interruptible. This way one could be sure it was truly the login screen and not something impersonating the login screen. At least, that's how I remember it. Could be urban legend.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  10. Re: So why is it used in Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ctrl+Alt+Delete is, or was at least, a so called "non maskeable interrupt". This makes it harder for Trojan viruses to take over the login screen and steal your password.

  11. Makes sense by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That was back when programmers were also engineers, and they realized the risk of accidentally hitting a single key and wiping the contents of RAM without saving. A complex key combination avoids accidents. I really don't see a problem with it. And considering that (most) keyboards still haven't evolved a "reboot" key, there doesn't seem to be great demand. Hell even the "Windows Start" key is probably the least utilized key on my keyboard, only good to tab me out of FPS games by accident and get me killed when I meant to hit Ctrl or Alt.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Makes sense by garyoa1 · · Score: 2

      The only way a single key would make sense would be to put it "under" the keyboard.

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    2. Re:Makes sense by edawstwin · · Score: 1

      You can always disable that key, or as at least one of my friends has done, remove the physical key from they keyboard.

      --
      I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
    3. Re:Makes sense by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I have a number of keys that are used far less frequently than the Win key... notably Scroll Lock, Pause/Break, Insert and, of course, Caps Lock. The least used key is probably the context menu key, which I've only ever used on systems with a malfunctioning or nonexistent mouse. I also rarely use most of the F keys... F4 and F5 are the only ones that see use on a regular basis.

    4. Re:Makes sense by moronoxyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I had a keyboard once with a dedicated start/shutdown key.

      After shutting down my system a few times accidentally I threw that keyboard away.

    5. Re:Makes sense by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      But then managers would hit it every time they went to change their password Post-It.

    6. Re:Makes sense by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      You might look into some of the gaming keyboards. They have a switch to turn off the windows key. To prevent that very problem.

    7. Re:Makes sense by Wookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      Remove the key. On every keyboard I've used for gaming, I popped out the windows key and solved the problem. If I ever actually need to use the key (which I don't) there's the other one on the right side.

    8. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of handy shortcuts that use the windows key...which I'll abbreviate as WK. The ones I use the most are:

      WK + e = open My Computer
      WK + l = lock computer
      WK + r = open Run...
      WK + d = show desktop

      There's quite a few others, but I'm not committed to learning tons of keyboard shortcuts.

    9. Re:Makes sense by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have a Corsair K60 and it has that feature. Rather nice keyboard, though the CherryMX red switches aren't as good for typing as the blues or the Model M buckling spring switches. When I have to type a lot I switch back to my Model M, but for light use and games the K60 is nicer. And the 20+ (I haven't tested more, not that anything over 10 is needed) key rollover is quite good.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    10. Re:Makes sense by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      You do realize that most PCs today ship with a power button that's effectively on the keyboard, right? After all, most PCs shipped today are laptops, and virtually every laptop has a power button that is for all intents and purposes a part of the keyboard, since it shares the same face of the device as the other buttons in the keyboard. People seem to have figured out ways around the problems you're describing as well, such as prompting the user to confirm that they want to shut down if they just casually press the button, or waiting for them to hold it down for an extended period of time before doing so without waiting for confirmation, either of which will prevent most casual contact from causing issues. And the buttons are typically located far enough out of the way that no one is accidentally pressing them anyway.

      The Windows key really is annoying, but no one seems to be suggesting we use that in place of Ctrl+Alt+Del. I'd just prefer that desktop keyboards considered borrowing from their laptop brethren. Mac keyboards in the mid-90s actually did just that, with a power button in the top right of the keyboard that would prompt the user on a single press, and would act as a confirmation for the prompt on a second press. Of course, something like that was rather trivial to accidentally press or otherwise abuse. I recall computer labs during high school where we'd distract our neighbors for a moment and then double-tap their shutdown key. So, I'm definitely not suggesting something that simple to abuse, but clearly there is room for something in between.

    11. Re:Makes sense by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had a keyboard once with a dedicated start/shutdown key.

      After shutting down my system a few times accidentally I threw that keyboard away.

      Apple keyboards have a power button on the keyboard. It's not the location or difficulty of hitting the key that matters, it's how it's handled. The approach currently used by Apple (but not invented by Apple, BTW) of "tap = request to shutdown, requires confirmation" and "press and hold means forcible power off" works just fine.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Makes sense by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I usually tend to avoid anything marketed as "gaming", because it usually turns out to be overpriced junk. This sounds like a useful feature however :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:Makes sense by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Except he's talking about using CTRL+ALT+DEL to enable login in Windows, not to reboot.

    14. Re:Makes sense by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      I use the Start key all of the time. Seriously. I use it in the following manner, essentially as a keyboard shortcut and linux holdover:

      *Start* (type some keys) (enter) to launch a program.
      Frequent uses include "cal" for Calculator, "not" for notepad, "wor" for Word, and "add or remove" for the Program Manager

      *Start* (# key) to bring up window #.
      One uses include Start+1 (Currently set to the Google App Launcher) (then used as the first example)
      Another is Start+2, which is always my E-mail application (across multiple computers)

      *Start*+R to bring up the "Run" dialog
      Frequent uses from the Run dialog are "dxdiag", "cmd", and "regedit"

      *Start*+D to "Show Desktop"
      Admittedly used less now with the prevalence of two monitors

      *Start*+E to bring up Explorer
      Used ALL THE TIME

      *Start*+CTRL+TAB to bring up a listing of all windows
      Admittedly, this is mapped to a StrokeIt Gesture shortcut (but the point stands)

      *Start*+DirectionalArrow (Up/Down/Left/Right)
      Used to move, maximize, and restore a window. Try it, Start+Left will put a window at half of your left screen. SUPER USEFUL. USED ALL THE TIME. EXTRA POINTS ON A BIG MONITOR. This is the fastest way to move windows to a second monitor.

      I probably do 90% of these every day. I use the Start key as much as CTRL and ALT.

    15. Re:Makes sense by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm using a Microsoft keyboard and it has sleep and log off buttons. However TFA and I were talking about the old, old keyboards, when MS-DOS (and Ctrl-Alt-Del) was coded. Not many of those had a reboot key, it certainly wasn't "standard" on the IBM PC. But yeah, keyboards have evolved.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re:Makes sense by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      Some of my friends knew quite well some particular Spectrum Z80 clone that had an (albeit recessed) reset button on the keyboard (well, the computer was inside the keyboard so to speak).

      Somewhere around windows 95 and all ping of death variations (valid for NT3-4 as well) we used to regret the lack of such key on PC keyboards. We were actually discussing how to include such key somewhere on the keyboard as cleanly as possible.

    17. Re:Makes sense by operagost · · Score: 1

      Guaranteed that your cat will stand on the power button for the requisite interval...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Makes sense by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You know you could have disabled the feature in windows right?

    19. Re:Makes sense by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Keyboards with suspend/reset keys where PrintScreen is located were pretty common about 8 years ago. I remember just removing the keys from the keyboard to avoid any accidents.

      2013 Macbooks have a "poweroff" key right next to F12. Don't know who the idiot that designed that is, but I just disabled it.

    20. Re:Makes sense by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I have sometimes wondered if a realistic argument could be made about the unused keys actually contributing to unnecessary plastic waste on this planet. Especially when there is a huge amount of PC keyboards being made all the time. If you ripped just the Scroll Lock key away from about 100 keyboards, you would have the amount of keys to make one full keyboard.

    21. Re:Makes sense by Garybaldy · · Score: 1

      I tend to like all the macro keys available on gaming keyboards/pads. Not for gaming itself but for quick keys for apps, commands, and most importantly often used text like email addresses and user log in's.

    22. Re:Makes sense by IwantToKeepAnon · · Score: 1

      I had a keyboard once with a dedicated start/shutdown key.

      After shutting down my system a few times accidentally I threw that keyboard away.

      TRS80's had a reset button but it was recessed and took more of a hardpress than normal keys. See upper right here

      --
      "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." -- Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy
    23. Re:Makes sense by mlts · · Score: 1

      There are a few keyboards that have that. Of course, my last one had it right by the tab key, so when I'd be playing some MMO, I'd switch targets only to shut the computer down or have it sleep... and the key wasn't disable-able with the normal "sleep key" function under Windows's power options. Of course when I came back to the game, it was usually not a pretty sight.

      The answer? My way was crude, but prying the key out did the trick until I just gave in and bought a usable bare-bones keyboard. (I hate replacing things unless they are broken as a matter of principle.)

      What I've wanted was a keyboard with a key that when pressed would immediately lock the keyboard and screen. Windows-L does work if I'm in Windows, but sometimes if the computer is very busy, it might not catch it, and I may not be running Windows, so engaging the screenlocker might be something more intricate [1]. Some old dumb terminals had a key that when pressed, it immediately cleared the screen and dumped all functions.

      [1]: Most newer Linux variants disable control-alt-backspace by default, so unless one explicitly re-enables it in the xorg.conf file, one can't just kill their X session by hitting that and letting xdm/gdm restart.

    24. Re:Makes sense by dissy · · Score: 1

      I suppose the closest thing in the PC world were the changes behind the PSU power button handlers in the ATX standard that replaced AT.

      I commented elsewhere that a keyboard power button didn't seem to catch on much back when they added the media keys to the 104 key standard, which is kinda where I would have expected it.

      But I completely forgot about the PSU power button, which basically works the same way as the macs keyboard power button.
      Tap to send an ACPI event to the OS, or hold down to power off.
      (The later being the part I use while working on hardware)

    25. Re:Makes sense by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I've been looking, but I've yet to find a keyboard that has both buckling spring switches AND "gaming" design (lack/disable windows keys, double-digit rollover). If one exists, I know it probably costs through the nose, but given what the crappy gaming keyboards go for, I think it might be worth it at this point.

    26. Re:Makes sense by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I'd contact Unicomp. They are the current makers of the Model-M, their keyboards are quite good, and they can do custom work. That costs more, of course.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    27. Re:Makes sense by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think it was Half-Life that let you map the WinKey however you wished (I used it for strafe). This is much more useful than simply disabling it.

      (Especially for us keyboarders who can't use the mouse or some other key combo because it hurts our wrists.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  12. Re:Redundant keys by killkillkill · · Score: 2

    I had to look down and check. Wow, there is a set of those keys on the right.

  13. Re:Redundant keys by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    That Windows key was a relatively recent addition to PC keyboards. It seems to have been inspired by the Apple/Command key on Macs.

    So I guess The early PCs could've used that space for the Start button Gates wanted - but then, what would they have called the button that's adorned the lower left corner of the Windows desktop since 95? What old song would've been used at the launch of Windows, since "Start Me Up" wouldn't have worked - the Beatles' "I am the Walrus"?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  14. Guessing by sls1j · · Score: 1

    that Bill Gates wouldn't approve of emacs either.

    1. Re:Guessing by rnturn · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's the other way around.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  15. Re:Why was it a mistake? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    Elegant? Ask an OSX user how to screenshot a window.

  16. Why would you want a single button??? by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A single button that, if hit, would reboot the system???? That's is the stupidest shit I've ever heard. If you hit it by accident, goodbye to your work. Remember that when you hit CTRL-ALT-DEL in DOS, it didn't even give you a prompt to shut down, it just rebooted. Who in their right mind would want that in a single key??

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    1. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who in their right mind would want that in a single key??

      Data recovery companies?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by vrt3 · · Score: 2

      This is not about Ctrl-Alt-Del to reboot; it is about having to press Ctrl-Alt-Del in Windows if you want to log in. This was implemented IIRC in Windows NT and Windows 2000, and in Windows XP if it was joined in a domain.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    3. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by jonathanjespersen · · Score: 1

      That button used to (and maybe still does) exist - but not on the keyboard. Many models of computers had reset/restart buttons next to the power button (and Turbo buttons). It was handy. I agree though that it shouldn't be on the keyboard.

    4. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by cgt · · Score: 1

      I have had a few keyboards (recently) with such a button.

    5. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Is the power button located on your keyboard?

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    6. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by geek · · Score: 1

      Is the power button located on your keyboard?

      Right above the Delete key on my laptop............... yes

    7. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Every laptop I've seen in recent memory has just such a button (granted, off to the side or top of the keyboard, but sharing the same face of the product and in close proximity, so for all intents and purposes it's a part of it), and they seem to be getting by just fine. Hell, most PCs sold today are laptops, so that means that more modern keyboards have these buttons than don't, and no one seems to think that they're a problem.

    8. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, if you randomly restart, there's a chance that your FS (if it's crappy enough) loses some metadata (happened to me a few times with NTFS). I'd think that finding lost pieces (whenever possible) is also a data recovery job (as is, for example, recovering deleted files).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      A single button that, if hit, would reboot the system???? That's is the stupidest shit I've ever heard. If you hit it by accident, goodbye to your work. Remember that when you hit CTRL-ALT-DEL in DOS, it didn't even give you a prompt to shut down, it just rebooted. Who in their right mind would want that in a single key??

      Actually, there were a few home computers that did have a single button reboot key. Some were rather famous and put it in a really bad spot (scroll down about 1/4 of the way or search for "reset").

      Of course, it was fixed In a later model (it was relocated to a spot less likely to be accidentally hit).

    10. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Only if they're able to recover the contents of dynamic RAM and get your unsaved WordPerfect doc back.

      DOS disk caches were smart enough to trap the CAD and flush their buffers.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Clearly Bill Gates wanted a single button for control-alt-delete because Windows users had to hit it so often. Any function used that frequently should be mapped to a single button, not a combination. Of course, Save should be mapped to a key instead of control-S as well.....

    12. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big apple fan, but their solution in the Apple II was an Escape key with an extra-strong spring under it. Don't know when they stopped using those.

    13. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I know you're being facetious, but you can't recover data off powered-down RAM. At least not on an industrial scale.

      The CIA/NSA might have something, but it'd be super expensive per attempt, and they'd never share.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    14. Re:Why would you want a single button??? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Because Ctrl-Alt-Del was already a low level hardware interrupt, and the NT kernel intercepted it, it was re-purposed for the login process. Mainly so the user could be certain that they weren't looking at a fake login prompt. It's a decision that made sense at the time.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  17. Re:Why was it a mistake? by robmv · · Score: 1

    No only other parts, on the same login screen

  18. Re:Why was it a mistake? by internerdj · · Score: 1

    Login security can be described in a couple of sentences, so it makes it nicely through the chain of command up to people who actually make decisions. A lot of security problems are simplified to just yelling Security! Security! by the time they are filtered to the decision makers.

  19. 3-fingers are just fine by Alomex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In my book that is the one thing they got right. It is a cumbersome combination as it should be since you do not want to reboot your computer by accident.

    It still irks me how easy is to accidentally shutdown your computer in windows when all you are trying to do is putting it to sleep through the menu.

    In programming languages this is called "syntactic salt" and it is used to implement powerful primitives that should not be used lightly.

    1. Re:3-fingers are just fine by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      So basically what you're saying is that goto should require a ten key combo operation?

  20. Revisionist history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ctrl-Alt-Del was a thing *before* Windows. Microsoft made use of it because it was there. It made sense to use it as a login trigger by intercepting its function. Especially since doing so put the reboot function under the control of the OS, not the user.

    Yes, I've only read the summary, not the article itself, but I suggest you read this in conjunction with it, or afterwards:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ctrl_alt_del

    1. Re:Revisionist history by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ctrl-Alt-Del generates a non maskable interrupt. Yes it was there before Windows, and even before DOS. If an OS wants to react to it other than instantly rebooting, said OS needs to install an interrupt handler for it. That interrupt handler is fired at a way lower level than ordinary keystrokes, malware, or friendly userspace applications.

      Using Ctrl-Alt-Del to trigger login gives you two kinds of security:
      1. Software cannot simulate a Ctrl-Alt-Del in order to play games with the login screen.
      2. By first pressing Ctrl-Alt-Del, the user logging on can be quite sure that they are giving their login credentials to a genuine Windows (or whatever OS) login screen, and not some malware that merely resembles the login screen.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Revisionist history by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Using Ctrl-Alt-Del to trigger login gives you two kinds of security:

      1. Software cannot simulate a Ctrl-Alt-Del in order to play games with the login screen.

      2. By first pressing Ctrl-Alt-Del, the user logging on can be quite sure that they are giving their login credentials to a genuine Windows (or whatever OS) login screen, and not some malware that merely resembles the login screen.

      Perhaps I'm simply misinformed and the software does something different somewhere...but I've 'simulated' Ctrl+Alt+Del from Remote Desktop, LogMeIn, TeamViewer, and VNC...I still don't follow how this still holds true.

    3. Re:Revisionist history by msobkow · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that Microsoft was the originator of MS-DOS, not IBM. IBM bought DOS from Microsoft to deploy on their machines.

      The predecessor, CP/M, did not implement CTRL-ALT-DEL functionality.

      So even though it predates Windows, Microsoft did initiate it.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:Revisionist history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm simply misinformed and the software does something different somewhere...but I've 'simulated' Ctrl+Alt+Del from Remote Desktop, LogMeIn, TeamViewer, and VNC...I still don't follow how this still holds true.

      That's different - you're using software to simulate the user SENDING Ctrl+Alt+Del.

      The previous post was talking about software not being able to intercept an incoming Ctrl+Alt+Del.

    5. Re:Revisionist history by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those programs and protocols have provisions to simulate a Ctrl-Alt-Del. A VM will actually simulate the non maskable interrupt. If you are remoted in to a GUI that is not on the physical console, then there is no keyboard to generate an NMI and the GUI you are connected to simply reacts to the simulated NMI (aka Ctrl-Alt-Del).

      But try 'simulating' a Ctrl-Alt-Del for the GUI session attached to the physical display/keyboard. I'll wait.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    6. Re:Revisionist history by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that the Ctrl-Alt-Del is baked in to the hardware at a low level. Lower level than keyboard drivers. The reason Windows can react to it is because it is an OS, and can install an interrupt handler for the non maskable interrupt. But that has nothing to do with keyboard drivers. If an OS does not install an interrupt handler into the slot in the interrupt table for the NMI interrupt, then the default interrupt handler address in that slot leads to a routing that reboots.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    7. Re:Revisionist history by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Way back in the Apple II days, sometimes we'd goof off in the lab by writing a quick program:

      10 PRINT "]'
      20 INPUT A$
      30 PRINT "ERROR - INVALID COMMAND"
      40 GOTO 10

      ']' was the Apple DOS equivalent to the '>' cursor in most Unix shells. A person seeing it would assume they were at the command prompt, type in a valid command, and get confused when the computer told them the command was invalid.

      Of course we were only out for a little fun so we were content with confusing a classmate for a minute or two (about how long it took the average person to figure out they weren't at the command prompt. But if you imagine someone with more malicious intent, they could've made the program appear exactly like a login screen and used it to harvest people's usernames and passwords.

      ctrl-alt-del is a workaround for that. It's a non-maskable interrupt so hooks directly to a specific function in the OS which can't be overridden. It'll bypass any program that's running (like our mischievous bit of code above) and always do what ctrl-alt-del is supposed to do. Normally it reboots the computer (so malware can't fake a reboot by blacking out the screen and displaying what looks like the normal bootup routine). But in Windows Server it's remapped to the login prompt so you can't be duped by malware presenting a fake login prompt to get the admin password and thus root access. In client versions of Windows it brings up the task manager, presumably so you can always kill wayward processes which have taken over the mouse input queue.

      Incidentally, the IBM PC wasn't the first with a 3-finger salute. Most older computers had it too. On the Apple IIe it was ctrl + open apple + reset.

    8. Re:Revisionist history by iroll · · Score: 1

      Yep, and it migrated to the Mac, too. At some point they added open apple + option + escape to bring up a task manager that let you kill unresponsive programs.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    9. Re:Revisionist history by hawk · · Score: 1

      It's also worth noting that MS was *NOT* the originator of MS-DOS; they bought it after selling it to IBM.

      Also worth noting that ctrl-alt-del was a hardware feature, not an ms-dos feature. Built in by IBM.

      MS-DOS simply ignored it and didn't prevent the restart.

    10. Re:Revisionist history by drussell · · Score: 1

      Apparently very few people here were actually around in the early days of the PC, never played with the ISA bus, etc. You're correct, Ctrl-Alt-Del does NOT generate an NMI... An NMI on early PCs just crashed the computer. It was usually only triggered on a parity error on most machines. It seems to me it was hooked to the back right pin on the ISA bus, so you could crash your machine by triggering it. If you did that accidentally while playing with the bus (we used to hook all sorts of things directly up to the bus using jumper wires shoved outside the fingers in the slots) or moving your home-made card around or something, you'd just ground the second from the back on the left side of the slot and that triggers a reset... IIRC, anyway... It's been some time since I built an ISA card... :-) Still have my original "soundcard" that was a basically just a DAC hooked to the bus at 0x300h that I built many many years ago around here somewhere... and my 16-port GPI/O card I built to hook up to a lightshow controller built from a whole swack of 7400 series logic... Oh, those were the days! :-)

    11. Re:Revisionist history by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I'm not a major expert, but I don't see why there would be a problem simulating a ctrl-alt-del input, when it's the computer's reaction to said input that's key. You cannot spoof how a computer will react to ctrl-alt-del, unless you have compromised the kernel already.

  21. I hate single-button action keys anyway by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    I have kids. At times, they've randomly walked up to the keyboard and pressed keys. That's how I found out that one of my keyboards had a "moon" key, and that it magically shut down my computer - no prompting needed. And the number of times I've intentionally pressed the "Windows" key? Probably once a year.

    1. Re:I hate single-button action keys anyway by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      The sleep key to put a computer to sleep was pretty common on OEM systems for a while (especially Compaq), but I see it less often now on basic keyboards.

      If you run Windows and never use the Windows key, you're missing out on a lot of good keyboard shortcuts.

    2. Re:I hate single-button action keys anyway by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Function of that sleep key should be configurable. Assuming you are running Windows, Vista or later, try hitting that Windows key you touch so rarely, then type "power", and select appropriate choice to go to correct control panel section.

      Windows key (since Vista) is the greatest input innovation in Microsoft OSes since ctrl-alt-del. I start basically any new task by hitting it and then typing what I want to do.

  22. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 2

    Because Ctrl-Alt-Delete is non-interruptible. This way one could be sure it was truly the login screen and not something impersonating the login screen. At least, that's how I remember it. Could be urban legend.

    I coulda swore that the inventor of Ctrl-Alt-Delete said the same thing as you in an interview in the 1990s. Might have been in Wired? Could be in a link in the article that I didn't read too.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
  23. Why would you by nbritton · · Score: 2

    Why on earth would you want a key on your keyboard to be a non maskable interrupt? Heaven forbid you mistype, or someone comes walking by and hits it. I'm going to have to side with IBM on this one. Also, what does C.A.D. have to do with starting a computer? It was only added to the Windows startup processes as a way to trick malicious programs into terminating.

    1. Re:Why would you by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Also, what does C.A.D. have to do with starting a computer?

      Ah, to be so young.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Why would you by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you meant starting as opposed to restarting...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  24. Re:Redundant keys by nine-times · · Score: 2

    No it doesn't speed things up considerably. The shift key on the right can easily be used with the pinky while otherwise typing normally, only inhibiting the speed of the keys that you would type with your right pinky. And what else do you hit with your pinky? The 'Enter' key? Backslash?

  25. Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm just glad we didn't have to do something like Ctrl + Alt + Del + F6 + Esc + (number pad) Enter for the same functionality.

    1. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      > I'm just glad we didn't have to do something like Ctrl + Alt + Del + F6 + Esc + (number pad) Enter for the same functionality.

      As long as you would need to use both hands, your nose, and your, uh, um... other appendage in order to generate that non-maskable interrupt signal from the keyboard, you are unlikely to accidentally reboot.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by isorox · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad we didn't have to do something like Ctrl + Alt + Del + F6 + Esc + (number pad) Enter for the same functionality.

      Or something like \

      ctrl-alt-del works no matter what keyboard you plug into what OS.

      Plug a US keyboard into a machine with a UK keyboard layout and suddenly domain\user is impossible, and user@domain means typing user"domain. You can't do .\administrator either, and you can't do administrator@.

      (Well you can type \ with a numeric keypad and numberlock)

      Heck earlier today I had a UK keyboard in some strange german layout where / was -, and z was y or something. Fortunatly I was only typing "e single passwd root 123 123 ctrl-alt-del"

    3. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You're talking about non-standard boot key sequences that are typically used for diagnostic or troubleshooting purposes. And quite a few of those sequences still work on modern Macs, last I checked, such as zapping the PRAM, booting from disc, booting from network, and booting into target disk mode.

      For typical use, you just press the power button, and then you're done. The gripe with Ctrl+Alt+Del is that it is the typical use on Windows machines during login.

    4. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Thanks to university where I had to switch between terminals using US keyboard layout and PCs using UK I learned pretty quickly that @ and " switched places. \ was a pain, but not as bad as ~ or `.

      My current laptop has US keyboard set because it has US keycaps (and Cyrillic for some reason) but every other device in the house with a keyboard (8 and counting) is UK. Doesn't bother me at all.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    5. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad we didn't have to do something like Ctrl + Alt + Del + F6 + Esc + (number pad) Enter for the same functionality.

      Bonus points to anyone who can remember what that key combo does in GNU emacs without looking it up.

    6. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by maestroX · · Score: 1

      Amazing, that's *exactly* the combination of my luggage!

    7. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad we didn't have to do something like Ctrl + Alt + Del + F6 + Esc + (number pad) Enter for the same functionality.

      I just had a WordPerfect flashback.

    8. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by hawk · · Score: 1

      That combination was already used by EMACS . . .

      hawk

    9. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      As long as you would need to use both hands, your nose, and your, uh, um... other appendage in order to generate that non-maskable interrupt signal from the keyboard, you are unlikely to accidentally reboot.

      Yeah, but think of how much worse the complaints about the lack of women in tech would be.

    10. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by isorox · · Score: 1

      Thanks to university where I had to switch between terminals using US keyboard layout and PCs using UK I learned pretty quickly that @ and " switched places. \ was a pain, but not as bad as ~ or `.

      My current laptop has US keyboard set because it has US keycaps (and Cyrillic for some reason) but every other device in the house with a keyboard (8 and counting) is UK. Doesn't bother me at all.

      I don't mind the fact that US keyboards are wrong (:p), it's the fact the only way to enter \ on this type of setup is to hit the Alt-numeric keypad

    11. Re:Could have been worse than Ctrl + Alt + Del by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not complaining about any lack of women in tech. The number of women does not affect me, other than that they dilute the pool of men by some percentage. :-)

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  26. Re:BSOD by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Would your rather your PC just turned off without any error message whatsoever? The BSOD is a useful tool... the mistake that causes it lies elsewhere.

  27. Re:Why not SysRq? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    Pick one that's essentially unused on a personal computer. SysRq, Scroll Lock, Pause/Break?

    Somehow, on an OS which has an use for Scroll Lock, I always use Ctrl-S/Ctrl-Q for this purpose anyway.

    Same for Ctrl-C.

    And SysRq is never used without Ctrl-Alt, and even that only if you mess with your kernel. Having any other key go as a part of that three finger salute would be just as good.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  28. Re:Why was it a mistake? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    You forgot the space. So 4 buttons to do one simple thing. Sure, and I remapped it to screenshot like it should be. That does not explain why it does not default to screenshot if someone plugs in a proper keyboard.
     

  29. Re:Why was it a mistake? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1
  30. Re:Redundant keys by __aaeihw9960 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Semicolon; damnit; why don;t people use that one more often; I find it can replace all other punctuation;

  31. Re:Redundant keys by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    Let us not forget the list or menu key or whatever it is called. Hell, not only do I not use it, I can't think of many times I have even heard people mention it. At least right now in firefox it seems to have the same effect as a right mouse click, but I only know that because I just tried it.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  32. Re:Why not SysRq? by moronoxyd · · Score: 2

    First one that comes to my find is "Why do I click 'Start' to stop?"

    I guess every interface has such design fuck-ups.

    I never used Mac OS but was told that you had (still have?) to drag the CD Rom or onto the trashbin to eject the drive.
    That always sounded strange to me.

  33. Re:Redundant keys by somersault · · Score: 1

    If you're touch typing, then p [ ] ; ' # / { } : @ ~ and ?

    So quite a lot. Especially if you're programming.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  34. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, in the past.I seriously doubt that is still true. Modern USB keyboards have no special handling for C-A-D.

  35. Re:Redundant keys by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    But people who type properly use both shift keys.

    Many keyboards have a space between the Esc and F1 keys. I heard somewhere that to allow for adding undetermined capabilities later, they originally wanted to add another key in that space. As it would be for undetermined functionality, and to keep with the naming scheme of the other function keys, this key was to be labelled "FU". While the actual key was never adopted, it's spirit has lived on in every release of Windows.

  36. Re:Redundant keys by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, most people think it's one of the few things Microsoft did right!

    --
    No sig today...
  37. Re:Why was it a mistake? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

    cmd+shift+3/4, or launch grab.app. Given that you can remap any keycombo on the Mac readily and officially...

    Actually for a window specifically, you'd want cmd+shift+4, followed by space, then click on the window.

    It works really nicely and I use it a lot; but if you're not used to it, it's hardly 'intuitive' (especially as after cmd+shift+4, you find yourself able to select an area to grab, so are unlikely to assume there's anything else to press to change the behaviour).

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  38. Re:Redundant keys by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Seems to do absolutely nothing in Chrome. Also just tried for the first time ever.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  39. Re:Why was it a mistake? by RedK · · Score: 1

    That is Windows 9x's login screen which could also be bypassed with ESC or just hitting Cancel in many cases. The CTRL+ALT+DEL login unlock was used on Windows NT, which does not use that login screen ;)

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  40. What's wrong with it? by wcrowe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't understand the problem. Ctrl+Alt+Del originally meant "reboot". That's obviously not something you want to do accidentally. If there's a problem it is in using the three-finger-salute for things other than reboot.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:What's wrong with it? by oo_00 · · Score: 1

      Probably bill telling lies again to cover up the shameful windows history.

    2. Re:What's wrong with it? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I remember the first time I saw a Windows NT box I thought the login dialog was a joke.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:What's wrong with it? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Then why is he blaming it on IBM? It was not pointless or stupid on the original, pre Windows PC. Keeping it in Windows is on him, not some schmuck at IBM.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    4. Re:What's wrong with it? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Then why is he blaming it on IBM? That was pre-Windows.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    5. Re:What's wrong with it? by GXB · · Score: 1

      Correct, before CTL-ALT-DEL there was a reboot key and it was invented by an IBM engineer to do what programming minds are incapable of doing quickly or easily, solving for the "all I did was" problem. Functionally, CTL-ALT-DEL is something done with the clear key on ordinary calculators and functionally in many other things we do, including in our last gasps before leaving this earth. For example, how many backspaces does it take in the course of writing an email to get all the words right--remember how corrections were made using a manual typewriter? Backspacing is a kind of "delete" key and most of us would be lost without it. Rather than to bemoan its existence, it should act as a reminder that we are not perfect in very absolute ways. The three-finger salute is symbolic of Gates' true feelings for his customers and those end users who are held hostage by his death-by-a-thousand cuts mistake-making operating system software, It would be reasonable to believe that he would embed his lack of compassion for people in such a keyboard artifact. His brilliance is in his ability to sell shares in a bridge he doesn't own and play the shell game without a pea. Gates was in large part responsible for aiding and abetting an industry responsible for the other half of Dickens' phrase "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." What he did mostly is send the programmers who could have eliminated the need for a CTL-ALT-DEL key below deck to row his ship in circles.

  41. Re:Redundant keys by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    You forgot |

  42. Re:Redundant keys by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Goo goo g'joob...

    I believe Helter Skelter or Revolution #9 would have been a better choice.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  43. Re:Redundant keys by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hell, not only do I not use it, I can't think of many times I have even heard people mention it.

    Woe betide you should you ever find yourself on a Windows machine without a mouse, then. Can't say I use it often but when I do I'm glad it exists.
    =Smidge=

  44. Re:Redundant keys by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

    I actually use that one quite often since I work in the POS industry. Touch screens have no easy way to right-click so I tend to use that one a lot.

  45. Re:Why was it a mistake? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

    Which automatically saves it to the desktop as a jpg with a time stamp.

    No stupid pasting into Paint & saving.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  46. No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Caps Lock should've been a no-op placebo, like a lot of those pedestrian light-change request buttons at intersections.

    Ctrl-Alt-Delete was actually a reasonable solution for the time, except maybe for certain handicapped users. Make sure the user never hits the reboot key by mistake.

    1. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Caps Lock should've been a no-op placebo, like a lot of those pedestrian light-change request buttons at intersections.

      Ctrl-Alt-Delete was actually a reasonable solution for the time, except maybe for certain handicapped users. Make sure the user never hits the reboot key by mistake.

      CAPS LOCK IS WONDERFUL, I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT IT

    2. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by splutty · · Score: 1

      How is caps lock a mistake?

      If you go back in time somewhat, it was actually needed to fill in certain TN3270/X3270/IBM3270 terminal templates.

      A lot of things would need capslock, but would still let you use lowercase for other things such as comments (remember Cobol? Nah, I don't think you do :)

      So no. No mistake at all. (Even nowadays, if you're entering activation codes and such, they're often in all caps *and* caps sensitive, which is retarded :)

      But I get your point CAPSLOCK SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN INVENTED... :D

      --
      Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
    3. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Those are not light change requests. Those are requests to include a pedestrian cross phase in the next light change. If you approach a corner and do not press the button and no one else on either corner presses it, then you will never see a "Walk" light ( along with the appropriate red/yellow/gree/arrow combinatiuons ).

    4. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 5, Informative

      Caps lock was invented for manual typewriters.

      When you wanted to type a capital letter, the caps key would lift the platten ( the key bar had the uppercase character below the lower case character ).
      The upshot of that was that when you typed an uppercase letter, there would be a slowdown while you waited for the platen to rise.

      If you had to type several capital letters at once, it had several major effects.

      First touch typists are never supposed to use Shift, CTL or Alt. and the key on the same hand. This slows you down. Actually there were no CTL or Alt keys back then. They were eventually added to only the left side of keyboards by geeks. When IBM started creating keyboards that directly entered strokes into the computer, they added both left and right. So a sequence like "CAPSLOCK" would have the person bouncing the platten up and down. This made the persons hands more tired and the typing much slower.

      Caps lock was a solution to that.

      Of course none of that logic applies to computer keyboards.

    5. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Depends on the corner, and how the lights are configured. In some places, this is true (no button press = no pedestrian signal). However, in some cities at some intersections, the lights go through the same cycle regardless (including pedestrian crossing indicators), and the button is just left there as a placebo so pedestrians aren't left wondering what to do to get a crossing signal.

    6. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by jandrese · · Score: 1

      CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by hawk · · Score: 1

      More commonly, the shift key moved the bank of keys to change which would hit, rather than moving the platen.

    8. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by drussell · · Score: 1

      If that's the case (NEVER altering the light sequence), the programming on the PLC has probably simply been changed since the buttons were originally installed. At least at some times of the day most lights in most places do change behavior if the pedestrian button is pushed. It may alter timing of the lights, for example, but perhaps only if it doesn't sense traffic, etc... Those systems are actually usually a lot more complex than you probably realize... They usually have vehicle sensor inputs, pedestrian button inputs, know the time of day, etc. etc. and often alter behavior depending on all of those inputs based on the parameters programmed into them....

    9. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by isorox · · Score: 1

      Caps Lock should've been a no-op placebo, like a lot of those pedestrian light-change request buttons at intersections.

      Ctrl-Alt-Delete was actually a reasonable solution for the time, except maybe for certain handicapped users. Make sure the user never hits the reboot key by mistake.

      CAPS LOCK IS WONDERFUL, I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT IT

      Seriously, I'm a vim user, and I mapped capslock to escape, saves a lot of reaching on my keyboard.

  47. Re:Why not SysRq? by 0racle · · Score: 1

    First one that comes to my find is "Why do I click 'Start' to stop?

    shutdown is a process the system has to start. You basically are telling the OS to start the shutdown routine.

    Also, organization.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  48. Re: Redundant keys by NadMutter · · Score: 2

    They could have stayed with the rolling stones - "Can't get no satisfaction", "As tears go by", "All over now", "19th Nervous Breakdown". Or if they wanted to be ahead of the times - "Get off my cloud"

  49. Re:Why was it a mistake? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    It does not work really nice compared to just using the damn printscreen button + alt.

    If someone plugs in a real keyboard it should just offer more reasonable options. Or here is a really crazy idea, but the damn buttons back on the keyboard. I have no need for changing volume, or brightness or keyboard backlight from the keyboard. Hell, that last one should just not be.

  50. Secure Attention Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I believe Bill Gates is talking about using Ctrl-Alt-Del as a Secure Attention Key (SAK), and is not referring to the function it had in DOS, i.e. reboot the whole machine.

    1. Re:Secure Attention Key by ls671 · · Score: 2

      I believe the intention was to make it harder for somebody to install a fake login screen on Windows. I remember reading about that somewhere. The idea was that even if you had a fake login screen running, pressing ctrl-alt-del would pop up the real windows login screen. It was supposed to me more secure that way ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  51. Re:Redundant keys by vtcodger · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure how much it speeded things up, but IIRC mechanical typewriters had two shift keys and touch typists -- a significant percentage of potential PC users in the 1980s -- would probably have been quite unhappy without their two shift keys.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  52. Re:Redundant keys by nine-times · · Score: 1

    Not me. I make better use of my right ring-finger than that. The right ring-finger can do so much!

  53. Re:Redundant keys by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Why not?
    Seems like the normal trackpad method could be used or any number of gestures.

  54. Re:Redundant keys by Saethan · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the numpad del

  55. Wrong? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Either Billy has a bad memory or the summary is wrong (possible both).

    On older PCs (under DOS) CTRL-ALT-DEL did a cold start (reboot). Similar to Apple ]['s ctrl-RESET combination.

    The reset key on an old Apple was in the upper right corner. I forgot how Suns and HPs etc. used to do this, but basically all Unix Systems (that means the Hardware of Unix Vendors, as they where Hardware vendors selling their hardware with their own Unix) had an at least two fingers "reboot salute".

    The keys where put far away from each other by intention. So you need both hands to press them and wont trigger them by accident.

    IIRC the old keyboards hat a special RESET line causing an hardware interrupt when the "reset combination" was hit on the keyboard. (There was no dialog popping up saying: oh, what do you want to do?)

    So the talk/claim about "ctrl-alt DEL" in the article can only refer to Windows. However, why would windows break with the DOS tradition?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Wrong? by phlinn · · Score: 1

      ctrl alt del is a warm boot. a cold boot requires the computer to actually be shut off.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    2. Re:Wrong? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That assumption of yours is logical.
      However you are half wrong, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reboot_(computing)

      What Ctrl-Alt DEL actually did (warm or cold reboot) I don't know. But a power cycle is definitely not needed for that. Many systems historically did a cold reboot on "reset".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Wrong? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Actually, [control]-[reset] did not necessarily reboot an Apple II; it would usually break you to a prompt, although it could be programmed to perform a reboot (most games that didn't want you dropping to a prompt and messing around would do this). To guarantee a reboot, though, regardless of the program running, you had to hit [open apple]-[control]-[reset]. Thus, Apple II had its own "three-finger salute", although on the IIc with it's reset button on the left instead of the right, you could do it with one hand and some of us would refer to it as a "Vulcan nerve pinch".

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Wrong? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Wow, I guess I have to go into my cellar and check this.
      I did not even remember the Apple ][ had an open apple key.
      (I still have my old Apple ][ and an Apple 2c clone )

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Wrong? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If by "on reset" you mean "pushed the reset button on the case," then he's not, in fact, wrong. Before the ATX spec turned everything into soft power management (may they burn for it), the "reset" button *did* cut power to the system: ram wiped, fans stopped, etc. The only difference between the reset button and the power switch was that one was a momentary contact switch, and the other was a toggle. So booting from a reset was, in fact, booting from a powerless state.

    6. Re:Wrong? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I did not debate that. I debated that a "cold reboot" always is powerless, which is not the case, see the linked wikipedia article. We are not talking about PC related stuff but about what cold reset and warm reset means.
      (I have no clue about 'PC's :D )

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Wrong? by phlinn · · Score: 1

      The definition of cold and warm reboots, at the time, was based on power going off. Calling a software initiated boot cold just because it triggers a post seems like a poor fit to me. Having had errors where i had to actually shut off the power supply on a more modern computer for 10 seconds for everything to fully clear (not frequently, but it's happened), there is a big difference between a true cold boot and a boot where capacitors never fully dicharge. IIRC, ctl-alt-del did not invoke POST when used from DOS, but I can't swear to it and I'm not going to install dos to test it. I know I've seen at least one system where a windows restart would skip bios memory testing even if it was turned on in BIOS, so I would call it warm boot as well. It may be hardware specific.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    8. Re:Wrong? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm missing the point you're trying to make...

      Reboots can be either cold (alternatively known as hard) whereby the power to the system is physically turned off and back on again, causing an initial boot of the machine, or warm...

      ... a cold boot is a boot process in which the computer starts from a powerless state

      Did you mean this one line?

      Microsoft Support article 102228[5] also confers that although the reset button is designed to perform a cold reboot, it may not disconnect the power to the motherboard

      Because if you look at the article linked from the wiki, it's basically full of weasel words and arse covering from MS about the reset button "generally" being used for a cold reboot, but not "necessarily" cutting off the power. Which is to say, doing a warm reboot.

      When everyone but Microsoft documentation is in agreement about a definition, it's not hard to guess which one's wrong.

    9. Re:Wrong? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Most workstations I worked with in the late 80s and early 90s had a reset button that did a COLD reboot, but did NOT disconnect the power.

      Which gets clear from the wikipedia article. I don't know about MS ... especially as MS only did software and no hardware I have no idea to what you refer.

      A reboot is COLD when it performs the exact same actions that happens during a power up. A reboot is warm if it takes a shortcut and leaves e.g. the memory in tact.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  56. rewriting history again? by stenvar · · Score: 1

    IBM Keyboards have tons of useless keys. If he had wanted a single key alternative for Ctrl-Alt-Del, SysReq, Break, or Pause would have been the obvious choices. In this instance, sanity seems to have prevailed, and the reboot key combination was something hard and obscure to type.

    If you're going to rewrite history, try to pick a better lie. Ballmer gave it a good try with "we forgot about mobile and are late to the party" (reality: "we almost had mobile in the bag and then lost it through my incompetence").

    1. Re:rewriting history again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IBM Keyboards have tons of useless keys. If he had wanted a single key alternative for Ctrl-Alt-Del, SysReq, Break, or Pause would have been the obvious choices. In this instance, sanity seems to have prevailed, and the reboot key combination was something hard and obscure to type.

      If you're going to rewrite history, try to pick a better lie. Ballmer gave it a good try with "we forgot about mobile and are late to the party" (reality: "we almost had mobile in the bag and then lost it through my incompetence").

      Excuse me? Who's the one rewriting history here? At the time, SysReq, Break, and Pause had legitimate uses in the computing world (you know, when computers of that ilk were primarily used by programmers and system specialists). Sure, NOW they're not used often (besides SysReq, useful in kernel development), but back then, they had their function.

  57. Re:Redundant keys by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    It seems to work at least in text fields in Chrome.

  58. Re:Redundant keys by AJH16 · · Score: 2

    Hey now, I use the right ctrl and alt keys when I need to Ctrl+Alt+Delete with one hand... Oh wait!

    --
    AJ Henderson
  59. Re: So why is it used in Windows? by bws111 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Huh? NMI is a hardware thing, Ctrl+Alt+Delete is entirely a software thing. The only thing that ever had to do with NMI (related to this) is that on the PCjr the KEYBOARD used the NMI to signal a keystroke. This had an advantage that even if your PC somehow wound up in a interrupts-disabled state the keyboard interrupts would still be processed, and thus Ctrl+Alt+Delete would still work (the BIOS recognized the sequence and branched to the 'reset' code). On the other hand, it was a mistake because typing could interfere with timing critical things (like async comms). As far as I know, the PCjr was the only machine to ever use NMI for the keyboard.

    Maybe what you are thinking is that there was no way (in Windows) to 'hook' the keyboard in a manner that could intercept Ctrl+Alt+Delete. That would prevent things from taking over the logon screen.

  60. Re:Redundant keys by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no Right Alt key. There is an Alt-Gr key, which isn't needed in the US, but in Europe, you need it to type characters that aren't on the main keyboard. For example, using my UK keyboard, Alt-Gr + 4 will type the € symbol, and Alt-Gr + e will type the letter é.

  61. Re:Why was it a mistake? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Only windows is that dumb. Saving to desktop is the normal method.

    It uses png by the way not jpg.

  62. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps, in the past.I seriously doubt that is still true. Modern USB keyboards have no special handling for C-A-D.

    Neither did old keyboards, but that's not the point. The point is that the operating system's low-level keyboard drivers have special handling for it, at a level that can't be modified by trojans unless they can muck with the deepest parts of the system internals -- and if they can do that then they already completely own the machine anyway.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  63. Re:Why not SysRq? by EvilIdler · · Score: 2

    You don't have to. You can press the eject key on the keyboard, or choose Eject from the right-click menu :)

  64. Re:Redundant keys by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

    I find that at least I use both of the shift keys, unlike the right Ctrl, Alt, and Windows keys.

    I have a 26-year-old Model M on my desk at work...obviously too old to have Windows keys on it. The right Alt key is remapped to function as a Windows key, and the right Ctrl key is remapped to function as a Menu key (I think that's what the other one is called). I think the only program on here that normally uses one of those keys (to the exclusion of its left-side counterpart) is VirtualBox, and that is set to use some other rarely-used key (F12?) instead.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  65. press the eject key by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That might eject it too, but Mac keyboards have an Eject key.

  66. Re:Redundant keys by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Touch screens have no easy way to right-click so I tend to use that one a lot.

    If they're Windows-based systems, that's patently untrue.

    From http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/using-touch-gestures :

    Press and hold does the same thing as right-clicking an item.

    Also applies to XP and 8.

    I actually use that one quite often since I work in the POS industry

    I presume most of your work involves non-Windows based systems? God, I hope so.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  67. Re:Redundant keys by res_comicus · · Score: 1

    I guess they're probably useful to lefties.

  68. Re:Why not SysRq? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Arrested Development would be a good code name for Microsoft development.

    Or slang.

    Or just a great put down.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  69. Re:Why not SysRq? by rgbscan · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can press the eject button on every Apple keyboard. Or right-click (control-click) the disc and choose eject. Or click to highlight the CD icon and press CMD + Y (put away) or CMD + E (eject) - Not much of a difference anymore, but in the old days when floppy swapping on a single drive was the thing, "eject" would leave the disc icon and directory contents cached on the desktop even after it spit out the floppy. If you clicked into it and tried to retrieve a file or whatever it would prompt you to insert the disk so it could complete the operation. At the time it was nice, since you didn't have to remember what was on what disc through trial and error, or writing really small on the floppy label, you could just have it psedu-mounted and still see the contents of multiple disks on your desktop on a single floppy system.

    If you were finally done with it, you could drag the cached image to the trash can to "unmount" it. The "put away" command OTOH ejected the disk and removed the cached image immediately. Dragging the disc from the get-go to the trash had the same effect as "put away".

  70. Rebooting the linux servers. by ls671 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I used to work for a small company where we had 10 Linux servers and 1 windows NT box hooked to a Keyboard Video Mouse (KVM) switch. My boss was using the windows server for Webtrends.

    He would never check which server he was on before pressing ctrl-alt-del to login so he would reboot the Linux servers at random causing customers to phone us because they were offline.

    Gladly enough, ctrl-alt-del isn't as hardcoded in Linux that it is in Windows. All I had to do is modify the init scripts to ignore ctrl-alt-del so that solved our problem.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  71. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    its not urban legend. that is exactly, and Bill Gates himself says it so on the first paragraph that Bill talks in the summary's linked article:
    From http://www.geekwire.com/2013/gates-harvard/

    “You want to have something you do with the keyboard that is signaling to a very low level of the software — actually hard-coded in the hardware — that it really is bringing in the operating system you expect, instead of just a funny piece of software that puts up a screen that looks like a log-in screen, and then it listens to your password and then it’s able to do that,” Gates said.

  72. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by supersat · · Score: 2

    Microsoft calls this the "secure attention sequence." I have heard that older PCs' keyboard interfaces would directly generate an interrupt on reception of ctrl+alt+del, but I can't find anything to back that up.

    Supposedly ctrl+alt+del was chosen to be the SAS in Windows NT because no existing app used it as a key combination.

  73. Re:Why not SysRq? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it already got 100 times explained why that is so.

    How do you copy from one CD/Floppy to the other?

    Insert one CD, it mounts and appears in your "Explorer" and on the desktop. Open a Explorer window.

    Right click on it and chose "Eject". The open windows are still there, the CD is still there it is only grayed out.

    Insert the empty CD, drag and drop files from the "CD that is not in the drive!" onto the empty one.

    The system kicks out the empty CD as it needs to read the other one and asks you to insert the other one.

    It asks you as often as needed to switch CDs.

    In the end the empty CD should be ready to be burned and the other one is still/again just a grey icon.

    To get rid of that icon you trash it into the bin.

    So dragging a CD ... well actually all above refers more to Floppies, no idea if that would work with a CD :D is just a shortcut for Eject + Unmount.

    Because Eject alone would NOT unmount the disk.

    I believe under OS X the above does no longer work.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  74. Start things up? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    However, an IBM keyboard designer didn't want to give Microsoft a single button to start things up, and thus the iconic three-finger-salute was born."

    I always had to use ctrl-alt-delete to shut things down, never to start them up. Besides, why blame IBM? They weren't the ones who assigned anything to ctr-alt-delete. Microsoft could have just as easily used F10 or ctrl-esc or any other key stroke.

    1. Re:Start things up? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Think Windows NT secure login prompt.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Start things up? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      This is Bill Gates trying to pull a Steve Jobs.

      Reality: MS-DOS was so error-prone that the arcane key combination used to recover from errors became famous. MS repurposed the Ctrl+Alt+Del with Windows when they also added a key with the same purpose, which IBM had nothing to do with.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  75. Re:Redundant keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I remember what I've read thirty years ago, Ctrl Alt Del was an IBM thing, not a Microsoft thing. An IBM engineer put it in as a debugging tool. If it had been deliberate it seems they would have used the SysReq key; in thirty years of using DOS and Windows I've never once seen that key used by any program, ever. SysReq would have been a better choice than alt-tab for switching programs when Windows came out, Ctrl-sysReq would have been superior to CtrlAltDel, and shift-SysReq would print the screen like it does now.

    Is it irony or hypocricy that on my work machine, after you boot it you have to hit Ctrl-Alt-Del to log on, and again if the screen saver comes on? It's a really stupid, unergonomic and user-hostile design; move the mouse when the screen saver is on and rather than taking you to a login prompt like XP and 98 did, you get a screen instructing you to CtrlAltDel, only after you hit that does the login come on. It's a really stupid design, but that doesn't surprise me considering it's Microsoft.

  76. Re:BSOD by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    By the way, is it these days still possible to see the full kernel panic message in Linux if the kernel crashes when I'm inside X desktop?

  77. Re:Redundant keys by pla · · Score: 4, Informative

    Woe betide you should you ever find yourself on a Windows machine without a mouse, then.

    Shift-F10.

  78. Re:Redundant keys by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    You know, for a guy with a name like "Sockatume", you sure do know how to spoil a joke! ;p

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  79. Re:Redundant keys by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Sys Rq is the same key as print screen. It is access via alt. I do not need to use shift to grap screen caps.

  80. Parent is correct. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    It was a spoof protection measure with the advent of Windows NT.... The security minded OS from Microsoft. ;-)

  81. Re:Redundant keys by somersault · · Score: 1

    Pipe is on the left side on British keyboards :)

    --
    which is totally what she said
  82. Re:Why was it a mistake? by robmv · · Score: 1

    You could "secure" it by setting a registry key forcing validation with the domain controller, but as you say that was easy to bypass too

  83. Re:Redundant keys by ragefan · · Score: 1

    I am a lefty. I never use them either. Mouse with right hand as the most-utilized short cuts are left-handed, Ctrl-A, -X, -C, -V, etc.

  84. Re: Redundant keys by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    I would think "Sympathy for the Devil" was more appropriate. ;)

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  85. Re:Why was it a mistake? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Macs have a keyboard control panel.

    You can reconfigure screenshot taking to any key you want, even an obscure PC key :D like prt-scr.

    no need for changing volume, or brightness or keyboard backlight I do that ab dozen times a day ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  86. not a big issue by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    I mean considering some of the ridiculous key-combos required on a Mac over the years both before and during OS startup, I bless Microsoft for only requiring 3 fingers to get things moving.

    I think at one time I had to use both hands and my tongue in order to get my Mac out of a retarded state, and it didn't even thank me afterwards.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  87. Re:Redundant keys by PacoSuarez · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is no Right Alt key.

    Err... I just looked down at my [US] keyboard and there is a key labeled "Alt" immediately to the right of the space bar.

    The Compose key is a much better way to handle extra symbols. Sun keyboards used to have a key with that name, and on Linux you can assign one of those useless keys to the right of the space bar (I use "Window") to act as a Compose key. Compose = E to get €, Compose ' e to get é, Compose / l to get , Compose ~ n to get ñ, etc.

  88. Re:Redundant keys by sootman · · Score: 1

    Really; It can; OMG that's amazing; Why did I never know this before;;;;;

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  89. Re:Redundant keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is no Right Alt key in England.

    FTFY

  90. Re:Redundant keys by alva_edison · · Score: 1

    Non-international (most in my experience) US keyboards don't have an AltGr key. They do have a right Alt key.
    Also, the default US keymap causes AltGr to function as a normal Alt.

    --
    He effected a bored affect.
  91. Re:Redundant keys by armanox · · Score: 1

    I use SysReq in Linux. Other then that, never.

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  92. Re:Redundant keys by armanox · · Score: 1

    Sun keyboards have both Compose and Alt-Graph (as I look down at my Type 6....)

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  93. Re:Redundant keys by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

    I've got it bound to alt-gr, so I can more easily type international characters and symbols. Of course most of those don't work on /. so it's pretty useless here, but if you happen to need it it's handy.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  94. Re:Redundant keys by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

    On my US keyboard (not that I am American), I use the right-alt as a alt-gr as well. To get accented letters, I press the alt-gr key, and then the accent and then the key I want the accent on. Fancy. Of course, I had to modify some settings to do that, because it's not on by default...

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
  95. It's the other way around by donutello · · Score: 2

    When you press Ctrl+Alt+Del on your computer, you know that the OS is the one that receives it so you know that the login screen before you was generated by the OS and not some malware that's sitting in userland.

    When you 'simulate' it from a remote session, you lose that guarantee. Any malware could intercept the simulated Ctrl+Alt+Del and show you what looks like the OS login screen.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  96. Re:Redundant keys by JazzLad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah, I find my right index finger works well on all keys. I've seen people feel all high and mighty because they use both index fingers, but I find 1 to be good enough for me. Whew, after typing all that, I need to take a break!

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  97. Not quite that simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He wanted a new key, not to re-purpose an old key. SysReq itself exists for the same reason.

    Pause/Break actually does have uses itself, you may not utilize them, but others do. Or say they do, and would whine like crazy if you took it away from them.

  98. Re:Redundant keys by armanox · · Score: 1

    Mine doesn't! (Sun Type 6 - right side has Meta, Compose, and Alt-Graph

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  99. Re:Why was it a mistake? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Perhaps ...

    But coding "blind" is pretty difficult with non american keyboards.

    I type more or less blind, but how would I find the increase volume or decrease volume keys while watching a movie in the dark? Or do you really want me to memorize that as well? :D

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  100. CTRL-ALT-DEL to _reboot_ was a mistake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This post incorrectly recounts the fundamental point of the referenced article. Read your own article before posting in the future!

    The article points out that the mistake was using CTRL-ALT-DEL as a way to login, not to reboot! Kudos to Bill Gates for admitting this huge design flaw. Only one of the many reasons I don't like Windows.

  101. Re:Redundant keys by gutnor · · Score: 2

    I guess the screen limitation is to blame. Prior to 2007, expectation for touch screen were quite low. (single touch, resistive, only gesture supported is "tap").

  102. Re:Why was it a mistake? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    You can actually set it to many formats. I forgot that png was the default. We always set it to jpg at my last job because of other system requirements.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  103. Shift isn't redundant, but Ctrl & Alt... by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Informative

    My keyboard has two shift keys. He should have used one of those.

    Where did you learn to type? Any typing class will teach you that you're supposed to use each shift key for the hand opposite to the hand which types the letter/number. Using one shift key all the time (usually the left) just puts that hand into needlessly slow and awkward claw positions.

    Theoretically, you're supposed to do the same with the Ctrl & Alt keys, but keyboard manufacturers refuse to put those in a consistent, pinky-accessible spot on the right side. (Laptop makers, I'm talking about you.) That's probably one of the biggest reasons that one-handed shifting has become so endemic. If you want a redundant set of keys, I'd point the finger at those first.

    (P.S. I also was taught to actually use the caps lock key when typing in caps, and it is a big pinky-saver when writing C macros.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Shift isn't redundant, but Ctrl & Alt... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I actually use my left finger for all shifting. I just use "incorrect" fingers when typing far-left keys. I keep my keyboard slightly to the left, so that makes it easy to use left-shift for everything and makes right-shift awkward to use at all. This is on an MS Natural Keyboard, though, so I'm sure it's different than standard keyboards. I keep a great typing speed this way, and I never have to look down.

    2. Re:Shift isn't redundant, but Ctrl & Alt... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Where did you learn to type?

      That's a loaded question. I didn't. I kept "cheating" when trying to touch type, and finally gave up and just switched the keyboard over to Dvorak, which forced me to learn the keyboard. Sure, my keyboard is now "retarded", but I'm a much better typist now.

      My shift key comment was a joke, by the way. I use both shift keys all the time - several times in this post, actually. I assumed it was so absurd a suggestion that people would know it was a joke, but people are defending my post, so... not such a good joke after all.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Shift isn't redundant, but Ctrl & Alt... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      My shift key comment was a joke, by the way. I use both shift keys all the time - several times in this post, actually. I assumed it was so absurd a suggestion that people would know it was a joke, but people are defending my post, so... not such a good joke after all.

      Ah, I took as serious as well. You wouldn't be the first to suggest it, and a number of companies have made keyboards with only a single shift key, such as on mobile devices; it's rare in full-size keyboards, though.

      Also, a number of people who are used to keeping the right hand on them mouse have trained themselves to use the shift key only. (I have to fight this bad habit when not using the mouse myself.)

      So, sorry. My mistake. My curmudgeonly, needlessly provocative mistake.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    4. Re:Shift isn't redundant, but Ctrl & Alt... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      There are several reasons for why the left shift is used by most people instead of both shifts:

      1) The mouse is usually on that person's right, which means shift+click is impossible with the right shift. That leaves either taking both hands out of their home positions, or the left shift which can stay in the home position.

      2) Again, the left hand is probably on the keyboard, so the left shift + left key can actually start typing while the right hand is moving back into home position. This is a big reason for me.

      3) Shift+i is used very, very frequently. Shift+q/a/z is not. Shift+a is the only combination used with any frequency, but since starting a sentence with a certain particular popular conjunction is frowned upon, that reduces usage significantly. The only real problem with the left shift is when used in those combinations, as you'd have to shift your entire hand over one slot to do so. But this is hardly a significant slowdown for modern touch typists.

      4) The arrow keys are on the right. Right ctrl/shift+arrow keys is only slightly less awkward than right ctrl/alt/shift+mouse.

      Individually, each reason is not much. But when combined, they make a strong case for using only the left-side control keys.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    5. Re:Shift isn't redundant, but Ctrl & Alt... by dissy · · Score: 1

      In addition, the two shift keys were added to the keyboard long before computers even existed, back in the days of typewriters.

      Pressing a shift key would physically move the entire carriage assembly up to align the second set of characters with the ink ribbon.

      This movement process took some time on mechanical systems, and qwerty utilized quite a few "features" that basically added in delays to help prevent such mechanical misalignment problems.
      A lot of those methods attempted to make most common two-key sequences use alternating hands.

      If you would literally hit shift and another key at the exact same time (instead of hitting shift first, then the other key), there was a small chance that neither set of characters would be lined up with the ink ribbon, and you ended up with either nothing, or an unintended super-script or sub-script character, or even both.

      Most all of the leftover slow-down "features" in qwerty (arguably all of the qwerty layout itself) no longer applies to our newer electronic typewriters and computers.

      When the mechanical typewriters had "hammer" arms for each key, they would line up in the same vertical slot while the arm was tucked away the same as a column of keys line up. (IE:: 1, Q, A, Z)
      If you were to hit two keys in the same column at the same time, the hammer arms would be trying to aim for the exact same spot above the ink ribbon, and typically jam up.
      One goal of qwerty was to try and group letters by their average usage and lay them out so one wouldn't need to type two characters in the same column for common words.

      This is why qwerty got the reputation of basically trying to slow down the typist.

    6. Re:Shift isn't redundant, but Ctrl & Alt... by volmtech · · Score: 1

      One summer when I was 13 I taught myself to type on the portable electric typewriter (which is on the floor of my garage this very moment for some reason) my mother had got with S&H Green Stamps. This was in mid 60s Florida, it was hot and rainy outside, what else could a pre-computer geek do? Being left handed I used my left thumb for the space bar. In high school I took typing class as an easy elective. The teacher said she would flunk me if I did not use my RIGHT thumb.

  104. Re:Why was it a mistake? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Except that Preview opens, crops & copies the file faster than Paint opens.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  105. Re:Redundant keys by ozbon · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's a system setting, you can mess with it (assuming Admin rights) through control panel.

    Control Panel > Users > Manage User Accounts > Advanced

    At the bottom, "Secure sign-in" - take the tick out of that, and Apply.

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  106. Re:Redundant keys by dargaud · · Score: 1

    Yes, and I miss the Menu key on my new laptop. Is there a way to assign it to any other key in KDE / X11 ? For instance the [Calc] key which I'd never seen before on a laptop.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  107. Re:Redundant keys by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A lefty I know mouses with his left hand. Can't vouch for certain, but it's likely he uses the right set.

  108. Re:Redundant keys by ozbon · · Score: 1

    It would've been far more fun to name that key the "Any" key, which would've erased so much luser confusion about "Hit any key to continue"

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  109. Re:Redundant keys by jorgevillalobos · · Score: 1

    Yeah, same here. Lefty and have no use for those keys.

  110. Start things up?! What?! by oo_00 · · Score: 1

    "However, an IBM keyboard designer didn't want to give Microsoft a single button to start things up, and thus the iconic three-finger-salute was born." Start things up?! I think he meant to stop buggy Microsoft's software before it crashes the whole buggy operating system of Microsoft. And there was a button designed for similar operation: Reset on the PC box. Used more often than all keyboard keys all together.

    1. Re:Start things up?! What?! by GXB · · Score: 1

      In the early days, before PC's, the action was Power Off and then Start. This is a universal solution for many devices today besides the computer. The problem necessitating this action however implemented on keyboards or directly on the computer hasn't changed.

  111. Re:Redundant keys by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    I'm in the US. I'm looking at the right Alt key adjacent to the space bar as I type.

  112. SysReq key by niks42 · · Score: 1

    I recall when IBM introduced the IBM AT Keyboard (84-key keyboard, with function keys down the left hand side where &deity. intended) they also introduced the 'System Request' key, intended as a non-maskable attention grabbing key. I don't think that was ever used either - though it did propagate into the 101/102 key keyboards later. Those of us who remember teletypes will recall the attention / break key as well - which never worked, trying to get attention on a round-robin timeshare system was always a pain - you kept getting timed out if you were a slow typist, and had to wait your turn ..

  113. Power key was more sensible on Macs by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a keyboard once with a dedicated start/shutdown key.

    After shutting down my system a few times accidentally I threw that keyboard away.

    Seems like a bad design. Macs had a power key for ages on their keyboard, but it pulled up a shutdown prompt instead of killing the whole machine instantly. (You could hold it down for 3 seconds for a force power down, IIRC.) It was also far above the keys and hard to accidentally hit on the machines I remember. This is the one I had on my Performa 5200, and this was the one my old iMac had. (You can see the power key on the latter above the divide between the letter and numeric keypad sections.)

    What was the keyboard you used like, and what OS was it for?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Power key was more sensible on Macs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In Windows the power key is configurable. On older versions it did an immediate shut-down with no prompt, but since Vista it has defaulted to sleeping/hibernating the machine... Can't remember which exactly, but it isn't a hard shut-down any more. Still very annoying, but at least you can disable it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Power key was more sensible on Macs by dissy · · Score: 1

      Seems like a bad design. Macs had a power key for ages on their keyboard, but it pulled up a shutdown prompt instead of killing the whole machine instantly.

      At the time the alt-ctl-del sequence was added into the keyboard controller as a special Key-ID-Seq, Macintosh did not yet exist and the equivalent system was the Apple 2 series.
      The Apple 2 series had a very similar button sequence (open-apple, control, reset), which actually did soft reboot the machine without confirmation.

      However I do agree, if you are going to have a dedicated power button then an on-screen prompt feels like a better design choice, since holding the power button a few seconds would still hard-shutdown.

      For some reason "power" didn't seem to catch on back when the "media" keys were added to the pc104 keyboard standard, which seems like it would have been the best time to do it.
      The only other major keyboard change since then was renaming the meta key to the windows key, however adding in power with that doesn't really make sense.

    3. Re:Power key was more sensible on Macs by hawk · · Score: 1

      >The Apple 2 series had a very similar button
      >sequence (open-apple, control, reset), which actually
      >did soft reboot the machine without confirmation.

      Those were the later ones.

      Initially there was a reset button that dropped you to the monitor. There was a well-known mod to require another key.

      Eventually, the control key was required; I forget when that started (the //e? I don't think it was the plus, but it's, ahh, been a while)

      You could get back into BASIC with esc-b or some such.

      Compucolor had a "CPU reset" button on the keyboard. I knew someone whose cat walked up his arm, curled around his neck to snooze for half an hour, and walked down the other arm, stepping on the key . . . he didn't know that there was a similar sequence, and lost something like an hour's work.

      For that matter, until the IBM PC, almost everything had *something* you could just push to restart; IBM got a lot of flack over this.

    4. Re:Power key was more sensible on Macs by dissy · · Score: 1

      True, control key wasn't needed on the // and //+
      Starting with the //e open-apple reset halted the running program and dropped to monitor, while adding in the control key did a warm-reset.

      I remember basic living at $d000 (the rom copy at least) which you could just type the address and "g" to go/run it.

      But the restart key sequence remained all the way through to the //gs
      (No idea about the /// - I never saw a working one of those)

      These were the computers I cut my teeth on growing up, so unfortunately I still have way too much a2 info taking up space in my brain ;}

    5. Re:Power key was more sensible on Macs by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      At the time the alt-ctl-del sequence was added into the keyboard controller as a special Key-ID-Seq, Macintosh did not yet exist and the equivalent system was the Apple 2 series.

      Perhaps I'm confused here, but as far as I'm aware, PC "power" buttons sent an entirely different keypress than ctrl-alt-del. So that's interesting, but not really what we were talking about. AFAIK.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:Power key was more sensible on Macs by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      Don't know about grandparent, but I have a modern full-sized keyboard with a sleep button. I still use it... but only because I popped off that particular key. I don't know why they thought it was a good idea to do that.

  114. Re:Redundant keys by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    Is it, by any chance, a Dell?

    I only ask because I have a dell keyboard in the office with several extra controls and.... a calc key. Which I just pressed and, lo and behold, even on RHEL 6 (don't get me started) it brings up... the calculator.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  115. Re:Redundant keys by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    Alt-Gr is one of the stupidest keyboard modifications I've scene. On many keyboards in the EU, Alt-Gr functions like a second shift key, eg. alt-gr and 4 will give the euro symbol....but why not just make this behaviour bound to alt? Why invent alt-gr?

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  116. Re:Redundant keys by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I ever find myself on a Windows machine, I figure woe already done gone betided me.

  117. use key with multiple apertures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think cntl+alt+del is fine for either doing a shutdown or restart (it that's what you really want to do, it should not be a single keystroke). HAL9000 required a physical key and multiple apertures to shut it down, http://mfwright.com/2001exp.html

  118. Re:Redundant keys by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

    WHAT ABOUT THE CAPS LOCK KEY?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  119. Re:Redundant keys by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    You are an abnormal lefty, as my wife and I both mouse with the left hand and use the right hand ctl,alt,shift keys.

    My sample of Two is 200% more than your sample of one so it makes it more better.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  120. Re:Redundant keys by omnichad · · Score: 1

    He could have used that very button for login at least. The shell wasn't up yet at the login window and it could have served both purposes.

  121. Re:Redundant keys by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    On US keyboards used internationally the right Alt is effectively AltGr.

  122. Re:Redundant keys by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    Doesn't work in Google Chrome.

  123. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since most can't seem to be bothered to read the TFA, you're all a bit confused.

    Gates isn't opposed to the three finger salute for rebooting, he's decrying M$ use of Ctrl-Alt-Delete to LOGIN TO WINDOWS.
    It would be nice if the title represented the story accurately, but this is slashdot.

  124. Re:Redundant keys by alanthenerd · · Score: 2

    The reasoning I always understood to use the Ctrl-Alt-Del for login/unlocking was that it was difficult to hook so if you pressed it you were certain that what you were then typing your password into was an actual login screen rather than some application that looked like the login screen that was designed to steal your password.

  125. Re:Redundant keys by hierophanta · · Score: 1

    I use it all the time. I dont like to repeatedly switch from keyboard to mouse as it causes my shoulder to ache, and this i find it way faster to use all keyboard

  126. Re:Redundant keys by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    Though the list key doesn't work either; they don't have the same effect as right click with the mouse.

  127. Re:Redundant keys by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Enter Sandman would have been better. Both more honest and far more bitchin'

    Exit Light,
    Enter Night,
    Take my hand.....
    We're off to never-never land...

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  128. Re:Redundant keys by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Most laptops have done away with it. I havent had that key on the last 3 laptops (Yes I buy a new one yearly)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  129. Re:Redundant keys by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Dude, we know that dealing with windows sucks, but you don't have to call the whole industry a POS.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  130. Re:Redundant keys by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

    This is incorrect, I am pretty sure. Plenty of programs and games recognize right vs. left ctrl, alt, and shift keys.

  131. Re:Redundant keys by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    It's a gift.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  132. Re:Redundant keys by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dont think you understand how POS a POS system is. Most have utterly crappy touchscreens that do not support "gestures" only a single "tap event"

    Almost 90% of all the Point of sale hardware out there are steaming piles of Fecies in quality, but cost 20X the price of regular hardware.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  133. It had to be ctl-alt-del by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary doesn't give the real reason -- it's in TFA. As ctl-alt-del was a low level interrupt on the PC to restart -- getting out of a bluescreen or a hung desktop -- and given that it was absurdly easy to write a trojan that mimicked the login screen, it became necessary to force users to use ctl-alt-del to log in to be able to tell the difference between the real login process and a fake one. There really wasn't a better choice. People had already used the key combination for years to unjam windows, and it was an easy way to enforce a needed security measure.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  134. Even when Bill's wrong, he's wrong by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    It makes perfect sense for it to be using something that a user's unprivileged application is incapable of intercepting and acting upon. Computers are so tiny and cheap these days, that I think a lot kids forget that we really did used to have multi-user systems (instead of everyone having their own smartphone). And in multi-user systems, users really DO write fake-login programs, in order to trick other users into giving up their passwords. Do you really think a typical teenage programmer can't write an XDM-lookalike program to trick you? MS was thinking of that, at the time, and they came up with a reasonably good countermeasure to the problem.

    Don't like it? Ok. I'll admit it's ugly. But what's your better (or even just-as-good) idea? AFAICT rival platforms address the problem by ignoring it. And as we're kind of drifting into a single-user systems, maybe that even makes sense, but I'm not sure it made sense to ignore the problem ten or twenty years ago.

    Bloody hell, there are/were so many reasons to either hate or mock Microsoft. And this? This is like going to job interview and being asked to list your faults. "I'm afraid I work too hard, sometimes to the detriment of my personal life. And I sometimes lose sight of my employer's desire to serve the community, instead getting bogged down with greedy concerns about increasing company revenue." Oh, Bill, you're so humble to admit this "mistake."

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Even when Bill's wrong, he's wrong by funky_vibes · · Score: 1

      Before Vista, there was no such thing as an unprivileged application in Windows.
      The ctrl+alt+del combo for login may have seemed like a good idea, but in reality it was security via obscurity, in other words, pointless.
      Or maybe they were preparing for a time when it would offer some security...

  135. Re:Redundant keys by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    In the USA there is... I have a left ALT key and a right ALT key. just like how my macbook also has left and right "command" keys. Heck even my toughbook has the dual ALT keys.

    Yes I have 3 laptops, and I use them daily for work.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  136. Where is Dave Bradley when we need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dave is the IBM engineer that "invented" alt-ctrl-del, was even a Jeopardy answer once.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bradley_%28engineer%29

  137. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Mryll · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a NMI

  138. Re:Redundant keys by DarKnyht · · Score: 1

    Frequently use when I am typing. It is easier than taking my hand off the keyboard to reach for the mouse to do something I cannot remember the shortcut key for.

    --
    Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
  139. Re:Redundant keys by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    A good reason not to use british keyboards I suppose. Good thing you can buy a proper keyboard and plug it in.

  140. uh by Tom · · Score: 1

    However, an IBM keyboard designer didn't want to give Microsoft a single button to start things up

    So putting the windows key on keyboards everywhere was just a kindergarden-level revenge act? Did they send IBM a postcard with the words "so there!" ?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  141. Re:Redundant keys by afidel · · Score: 1

    Mousekeys =)
    It's what I use when I misplace the wireless trackball for the HTPC.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  142. If I had a nickel ... by romanr · · Score: 2

    Bill Gates: If I had a nickel for every time someone had to hit Ctrl-Alt-Delete - I'd be a Billionaire
    Bill Gates: Oh Yeah, I am....

  143. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Neither did old keyboards, but that's not the point. The point is that the operating system's low-level keyboard drivers have special handling for it

    Then Gates is wrong to blame the IBM keyboard engineers. He could have chosen any key or key combo.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  144. Re:Redundant keys by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

    Or to users of certain software. I use Right-Ctrl a lot in Visual Studio, and I'm sure there's a whole army of Emacs fans ready to add their two bits.

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  145. Re:Redundant keys by modecx · · Score: 1

    Hell, I'm a righty and I use the right hand function keys, but only when my right hand isn't mousing. I'm probably some kind of mutant.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  146. Re:Redundant keys by n7ytd · · Score: 1

    The perfect key to be assigned as the Host Key in Virtualbox...

  147. Re:Redundant keys by somersault · · Score: 1

    Except that would do SFA unless you change the regional settings too.. :D

    --
    which is totally what she said
  148. Re:Redundant keys by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    Unless the machine is booted from CD or USB running another OS, then ctrl-alt-del can be captured as well.

  149. Re:Redundant keys by sexconker · · Score: 1

    If I remember what I've read thirty years ago, Ctrl Alt Del was an IBM thing, not a Microsoft thing. An IBM engineer put it in as a debugging tool. If it had been deliberate it seems they would have used the SysReq key; in thirty years of using DOS and Windows I've never once seen that key used by any program, ever. SysReq would have been a better choice than alt-tab for switching programs when Windows came out, Ctrl-sysReq would have been superior to CtrlAltDel, and shift-SysReq would print the screen like it does now.

    Is it irony or hypocricy that on my work machine, after you boot it you have to hit Ctrl-Alt-Del to log on, and again if the screen saver comes on? It's a really stupid, unergonomic and user-hostile design; move the mouse when the screen saver is on and rather than taking you to a login prompt like XP and 98 did, you get a screen instructing you to CtrlAltDel, only after you hit that does the login come on. It's a really stupid design, but that doesn't surprise me considering it's Microsoft.

    CTRL+ALT+DEL serves as a SAK - secure attention key. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_attention_key
    It's a security feature (which you can disable if you want).

  150. Re:Redundant keys by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    SysReq would have been a better choice than alt-tab for switching programs

    I don't want programs to switch focus from a casual mistype. That's also why I turn off mouse focus in *nix environments (a minor nudge of the mouse or the laptop "eraser" pointer, and you're suddenly typing in a different window).

    after you boot it you have to hit Ctrl-Alt-Del to log on, and again if the screen saver comes on? It's a really stupid, unergonomic and user-hostile design

    Security is often "user hostile". Windows kernel intercepts all ctrl-alt-del inputs and sends them to winlogon first, and other programs (supposedly) can't unilaterally react to the sequence. That means that when you hit ctrl-alt-del, you know that the logon screen you're interacting with is the one that the kernel says is the authoritative winlogon process, not nakidpix.exe's phishing window. Of course, UAC broke that model since you don't have to type ctrl-alt-del before it requests a password.

  151. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  152. Re:Redundant keys by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dont think you understand how POS a POS system is.

    Sure I do - I used to build Quicken-branded, XP-based abominations for a living; "Why the fuck do they ship an LCD display that isn't compatible with the other hardware??? Yer killin' me, Smalls!"

    Most have utterly crappy touchscreens that do not support "gestures" only a single "tap event"

    Almost 90% of all the Point of sale hardware out there are steaming piles of Fecies in quality, but cost 20X the price of regular hardware.

    Agreed, but that doesn't change the fact that Windows-based touchscreen systems have had tap-and-hold-to-right-click since, like, 2003.

    Since we're talking about Windows/MS stuff here, it would be kind of assanine to assume OP was talking about a non-Windows POS.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  153. Re:Redundant keys by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Yes, but if the system respects sysrq you don't get that behavior.

  154. Re:Redundant keys by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 1

    I often use it to get spell check results without moving a hand to the mouse, though it doesn't seem to show them in this text box (using Chrome).

    --
    horror vacui
  155. Re:Redundant keys by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure touchscreen support was added to XP in 2003, though I do understand and agree to the point that the touchscreens on the market in those days sucked massive donkey shlong.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  156. Re:Redundant keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And right-handed people who type with both hands.

    I listed my most frequently-used key combos and 7 use the left Ctrl or Alt keys, while 11 use the right.

  157. Ctrl+Alt+Del - the worst mistake... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Ctrl+Alt+Del - is the worst mistake in computer history. Anyone who have been programming in C or Assembly on MS-DOS has experienced more than not that it wasn't doing crap and since the logic from the higher beings stated that you don't need a reset button because you have... Ctrl+Alt+Del... - it meant that power cycling was the only way to revive the computer. So count how many power cycles that occurred in a day... Bad programmer you think - well, considering that this was the 80's and there were few good tools for MS-DOS at the time that was how it was. At least it was good in the way that you did learn to really check your code by hand to avoid a crash - and develop certain coding habits.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  158. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  159. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by zzsmirkzz · · Score: 2

    CTRL+ALT+DEL was already a well known, highest priority, key combination from before windows existed. Back when hardware had actual interrupt assignments, the keyboard was assigned the lowest interrupt (the user in front of the keyboard was considered the most important and had highest priority over all other sub-systems - yes lower numbers had higher priorities for those who don't remember). CTRL+ALT+DEL was designed to allow the user to forcibly (and controllably) reboot the system should some lower-priority sub-system be mis-behaving. The only time this did not work was when the CPU itself was frozen (divide by zero, anyone?). That is where the low-level, special-handling was originally designed - in hardware.

  160. love it by exxaminer · · Score: 1

    Looking back..i kinda liked it..:-)

  161. Re:What about security against Microsoft? (+5 True by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Well, even the Amazon Spying Lens snuck into Ubuntu even though the OS is mostly based on free software.

  162. Re:Redundant keys by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Alt-GR would be great in the US to allow people to realize that these characters were available.

    While we're at it, how about bringing back window management keys. When I used a Sun Sparc, we had keys for front, back, forward, backward to allow us to management windows appropriately..

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  163. Re:Redundant keys by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

    No different than a Windows user without a GUI in Linux. You know the system you work with.

  164. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by cusco · · Score: 1

    That was because prior to Windows NT pressing Ctl+Alt+Del would reboot the system. If you did a three finger salute in DOS you've just lost whatever you were working on because that was an immediate restart. No graceful shutdown, no saving anything, it was just one step up from yanking the power cord.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  165. Re:Redundant keys by Skiron · · Score: 1

    What you forget - or do not know - is the reason. MS code crashed a lot, so they needed a way to do a 'user' restart.

    I think the only thing MS has done for Joe Public was that computers crash a lot, and it is normal. And it is still apparent today, as sheeple don't shrug an eyelid when things do not work.

  166. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Because Ctrl-Alt-Delete is non-interruptible. This way one could be sure it was truly the login screen and not something impersonating the login screen. At least, that's how I remember it. Could be urban legend.

    I coulda swore that the inventor of Ctrl-Alt-Delete said the same thing as you in an interview in the 1990s

    Ctrl-Alt-Del came about with the original IBM PC in 1982. IBM PCs had no login screen at all and in fact there would have been no way to hook one up to a network.

  167. Re:Redundant keys by pla · · Score: 2

    Doesn't work in Google Chrome.

    I beg to differ - I just tried it, works just fine (well, in Chromium, anyway - I don't see much reason to use the version that comes pre-loaded with Google spyware). As does the "menu" key.

    Perhaps you have some misbehaving plugin capturing your keystrokes and not properly passing them on to the parent window?

  168. Re:Redundant keys by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    If I ever find myself on a Windows machine, I figure woe already done gone betided me.

    Indeed, then it is time for a "Controlled Escape"...

  169. Re:Redundant keys by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Since we're talking about Windows/MS stuff here, it would be kind of assanine to assume OP was talking about a non-Windows POS.

    You mean like BeOS?

  170. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    It's not an urban legend. The kernel traps that key sequence at a low level for security purposes. That's what Gates alludes to in the article.

    SysRq would be the more logical choice (barring neophyte confusion with print screen) but the NT designers were wise enough to not depend on a key that was missing on many laptops by the early 90's. The three finger salute is guaranteed not to be used by legacy DOS and Windows software for core functionality so it was the natural choice to be repurposed for requesting attention from the kernel.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  171. Re:BSOD by Monsuco · · Score: 1

    Would your rather your PC just turned off without any error message whatsoever? The BSOD is a useful tool... the mistake that causes it lies elsewhere.

    It was a useful tool. In Windows 8 Microsoft basically replaced it with a frowny emoticon. It was bad enough that it used to default to rebooting the second it finished saving a memory dump but that setting was easily changed. The decision to remove the error codes from WIndows 8's BSOD was just plain stupid. Now I have to hunt down what caused the error rather than just writing it down whenever I see it.

  172. Re:Why was it a mistake? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if those specific Mountain Lion shortcuts replace the previous ones or not. Hopefully not.

    To take a screenshot on a Mac it's always been command-shift-3. By using other combinations (4 instead of 3, or option instead of command for example) you can take shots of just a window, or a drawn out section of the screen, or other variations. Mac keyboards don't have a dedicated print screen button, which is a good choice because it's rarely used. The functionality is a single key combination, with close alternatives for variations. It's fairly simple and doesn't waste a key.

  173. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Because Ctrl-Alt-Delete is non-interruptible. This way one could be sure it was truly the login screen and not something impersonating the login screen. At least, that's how I remember it. Could be urban legend.

    Ctrl + Alt + Delete is software defined to be non-interruptible by assigning it an interrupt at the keyboard IO level, because MS devs are a fucking twits. Look at the pause key. What does that say? Pause|Break. Gee, if only you could use the Break command to ensure you were breaking out of any software and sending your request directly to the system... Wait, what's that over there on the Print Screen key?!!?! SysReq?! What the-- you mean to say... Bill Gates is a fucking idiot with such a severe case of "not invented here" syndrome he created an alternate key combo rather than use the one that's LABELED on the FUCKING KEYBOARD?!

    You windows "nerds" are quaint.

  174. Re:Why was it a mistake? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Newsflash, the majority of people who use computers change things like the volume and brightness a hell of a lot more than they take screenshots. So when you plug in a REAL keyboard (i.e. one that doesn't waste keys on things like print screen) you need to use a key combination for taking a screen shot.

  175. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Protip: BIOS is software too... The real history is that the BIOS Ctrl+Alt+Del was set to soft boot the system in BIOS, and when you create an OS you can re-map the interrupt vectors to be your own, but DOS left Ctrl+Alt+Del in place because it reused much of the BIOS supplied interrupts. So, it's a hold over from DOS, which means not only is Billy G a fool, but a liar.

  176. Re:Redundant keys by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    UK Keyboards are used in Ireland, and in the Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus, where € is their national currency.

  177. Re:"Mission Accomplished" by tsalmark · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates is a total idiot? Either you misunderstood which Bill Gates this is about or you need to go buy a dictionary.

  178. Re:Redundant keys by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    In Excel 2013 for example Alt+4 and Alt-Gr+4 do two completely different things.

    Alt+4 presses the 4th button on the Quick-Access toolbar, which in my case in the "Print Current Sheet" button.
    Alt-Gr+4 enters the € symbol at the current insertion point in much the same way that Shift+4 enters the $ symbol or Shift+3 enters the £ symbol.

  179. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Glossing over the ugliness that was the keyboard controller, A20 etc.

    That is why you want a PC without a PS2 keyboard connector. Not sure how much of that still lives on.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  180. Re: So why is it used in Windows? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Maybe DickBreath is paid by the word.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  181. Which would suggest... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...that Mr Gates really didn't understand engineering, and the danger of having "reboot the whole machine" on one, easily-accidentally-struck key.

    --
    -Styopa
  182. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    PS/2 ports are the only keyboard interfaces that generate interrupts intstead of polling, and the only ones that can handle n-key rollover in a sane fashion.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  183. Re:Redundant keys by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

    So...you use both hands to hit Ctrl-A/X/C/V, Super(windows key)-E/D/R or Alt-Tab/F4? I'm a lefty, but most of the shortcuts I use are on the left side of the board...which means that when I do use a mouse, to increase my functional speed it's in my right hand. Also, there's not very many quality mice that are left handed and only a couple of left-handed gaming mice, which so far I find of dubious quality (looking at you, RAZER). There's only 2 keystrokes that I regularly use on the right side of the board: Super-L and Alt-Enter.

    My wife also has similar complaints, but uses a TrackPad instead of a mouse now but when she did use a mouse, she used it on the right side even though she has next to 0 use of her right hand due to disability. Just what she's comfortable with.

    So that's an additional sample of two against your sample of two...bringing it up to 3 to 2. We're more common.

  184. Alternate reality in the Apple ][ universe by slew · · Score: 1

    In my book that is the one thing they got right. It is a cumbersome combination as it should be since you do not want to reboot your computer by accident.

    For users of the original Apple ][, which had a single-finger "reset" key, this was a real-world concern since it was hard-wired to send a reset signal and drop you into the monitor rom shell. Of course the reset key was sadly positioned right above the return key which made it really easy to hit accidentally at the end of every line you typed.

    In later revisions of Apple ][ computers, I believe they put a thick rubber ring washer inside the key which required you to really push down to squish the washer make mechanical/electrical contact (I think that was probably inspired by a "hard-hack" made by many folks who did this one too many times). Finally, when they got to the Apple ][+, they changed to a CTRL-RESET two-finger reset (of course the newer auto-start ROM-monitor and the OS's got better at trapping/recovering the reset by then, so it was less important).

    By then the IBM-PC was out and perhaps they avoided this pitfall by having a 3-finger reset from the get-go...

  185. Re:"Mission Accomplished" by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Look, compared to the homeless people who root through the dumpster of my building...no Bill Gates is not a 'total idiot'...

    I *hate* arguing over definitions of words when the concepts are well understood...

    Bill Gate's reputation as a 'tech innovator' or 'computing industry pioneer' are completely and wholly unearned.

    The *real* work was done by others and he and his partners copied the work of others, created planned obsolescent software, purposefully removed features to bottleneck users and cheat out competition...

    They were willing to shut up and take orders...that's why people like Bill Gates and W. get into positions of power...

    Microsoft would be *NOTHING* without the IBM contract for PCs for the federal government...that guaranteed them a revenue stream

    Microsoft's success is not a pattern to follow for others to build a business...all they did was do what others told them to do.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  186. Re:Redundant keys by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    My sample of Two is 200% more than your sample of one so it makes it more better.

    *pushes taped glasses up his nose after they'd slid down a bit* Accctttuuually, your sample of two is 100% more than his sample of one, or your sample of two is 200% of his sample of one.

  187. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by swillden · · Score: 1

    What about the older 5-pin DIN connector that predated the PS/2?

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  188. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by lgw · · Score: 1

    Is was that way in early Linux too, and quite annoying in EMACS, where of course you'd be assigning all sorts of useful CTRL-ALT sequences.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  189. Re:Redundant keys by Arker · · Score: 1

    On a UK keyboard you have the alt-gr key in the same place, but on the US keyboard there are two alt keys, not an alt-gr and an alt like a UK keyboard.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  190. Re:Redundant keys by jimbo · · Score: 1

    Genius. I wonder if VMWare Player can be configured to do this...

  191. Re:Why was it a mistake? by lgw · · Score: 1

    I just think it's odd that they took login security so seriously and then fucked up so badly on all other parts of the OS.

    What OS do you think they fucked up badly on? The point and purpose of Windows 95 was a nearly-impossible engineering challenge: make a 32-bit, protected memory OS that was backwards-compatible with 16-bit, shared memory drivers and applications. They did that, and dominated the market. IT hated the Win95 line because it was so unreliable, but that was due to that very backwards compatibility to crappy 16-bit stuff. For all that it sucked to be the guy supporting it, the OS did just what was intented: become the OS that most IT guys were stuck supporting.

    The WinNT kernel and system libraries has generally been pretty good, with a brief exception when they brought the Win95 plug-and-play subsystem directly into the NT codebase for Win200 (cause many kernel guys to leave). For the most part, the flood of security problems in the XP years weren't kernel (or system library) problems. You can blame the platform, to be sure, but it's wrong to blame the part properly called "the OS".

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  192. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    It's the same thing, with a smaller connector. Unless you're talking about the really ancient ports on an XT. But in that case, I don't think you need n-key rollover anyway.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  193. Re:Redundant keys by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    I was thinking more along the line of whatever it is that MICROS uses.

    Side note: Googling BeOS - now there's a nice trip down memory lane.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  194. Re:Why not SysRq? by Arker · · Score: 1

    "First one that comes to my find is "Why do I click 'Start' to stop?""

    So you can start stopping, doh. ;)

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  195. Re:Why was it a mistake? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    They made consistently horrible security design decisions in all versions of Windows until at least Vista when they started to take security seriously.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  196. It Should Have Been a Single Key by ks*nut · · Score: 1

    Right hand or left hand I would certainly know which finger to use - the single finger salute.

  197. Re:Redundant keys by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Well why the heck did Bill Gates have this the combination to make you login into Windows NT.

    Back in Dos and Windows 3.1 Alt-Ctrl-Delete Rebooted the PC, when it locked up.
    Then they started catching it and giving you more and more options, and you need it to login??

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  198. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by swillden · · Score: 1

    I assumed that was the case, that those old interfaces generated interrupts, but your statement made me wonder if perhaps they used a different approach -- which would have been weird back then.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  199. Re:Why was it a mistake? by lgw · · Score: 1

    Say rather, they consistently made decisions that were horrible for security, because they cared more about usability (and man did they mess up usability when they switched that focus in Vista). It wasn't obvious when XP was being written that that was the wrong decision. I was still far more angry in 2000 than MS had invented the "Word Macro Virus" than any security threat to the OS.

    The big problem was the 5 year delay between XP and their mindset change. MS was taking security seriously before 2006, but XP was unfixable - when everyone runs as admin and all software is trusted, you can't patch that. Had the Vista security mindset accompanied Server 2003, (where the usability gaffe would have been acceptable, really), followed quickly by a consumer OS that got it right, much of the horror would have been averted.

    TLDR: XP was right for 2001, but 5 years to Vista? Epic fail.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  200. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by bws111 · · Score: 1

    There is no ctrl+alt+delete interrupt - where does this idea come from?

    Now, for the question of why the combination was chosen instead of a specific key. Well, early on of course ctrl+alt+del was used to signal the BIOS to reboot the machine. Obviously, having a single key that can cause that function would be pretty dumb, so the combination made sense. That left all of the other keys able to be used by applications. Sure, YOU may never had to use the SysReq key, but if you were running an IBM 3270 or 5250 terminal emulator you used it, because a real 3270 had that key. Same with all the other keys - some app is probably using them for something.

    So, when Windows needed a key to be used by the OS alone, what to do? Use the one combination that you KNOW no app is using, or grab a key and annoy all the users of apps that previously used that key?

  201. Re:Why not SysRq? by dwpro · · Score: 1

    "Why do I click 'Start' to stop?"

    I don't think the word start was ever intended to be reflective of all functions of the machine, but rather a starting point for beginners. I've always wondered how people that are troubled by this phrasing manage to close their cereal boxes after reading the phrase "---open here--" on the top.

    --
    Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  202. Re:Redundant keys by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    This rule was invented when manual typewriters were common, so that it was extremely difficult to press and hold the left shift while striking a left hand key forcefully enough to transfer the ink. So most touch typists who were trained will stick to this rule. However I note that a lot of "self trained" typists who learned only on a computer have a more haphazard typing style even if they eventually learn to type quickly.

  203. Re:Redundant keys by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I really dislike most European keyboard layouts, they're just clumsy for so many special keys. Ie, a German keyboard can't type either / or \ without a modifier key, so I found that typing commands lines with paths to be very cumbersome that way (unix or dos).

    On the other hand, if you want to do touch typing in European languages then you need put those common accented characters where they can be typed easily instead of relying on the AltGr kludge, so the special keys are the ones that got replaces (right pinky and shifted numbers).

  204. Re:"Mission Accomplished" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Maybe not total idiots, but definitely wrong in those contexts. A single "reboot me now!" key would have been a disaster. I've had these disasters even with the power button when put on a keyboard (whoops, shutting down now, no cancel button). Sure you can change the behavior but usually you make the mistake once before you're prompted to figure out how to change it (and it wasn't so easy to find in Windows 8).

  205. Re:Redundant keys by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Well, THAT is easily explained. Since this combination gets caught by the hardware, you can rely on Windows to give you a real prompt. If they used some other method, you couldn't be sure if it was the real prompt or a program acting like the login prompt so it can steal your password. No matter what you are doing in Windows NT and it's successors, you can always guarantee that the real Windows will respond when you hit Ctrl-Alt-Delete.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  206. Re: So why is it used in Windows? by bws111 · · Score: 1

    If you are going to accuse someone of not knowing what they are talking about, you should at least make sure you know what you are talking about.

    NMI (non-maskable interrupt) is a physical pin on the processor. It is used (when used at all) to signal something very important (like memory errors). Your keyboard has no connection to this pin, and is therefore most certainly NOT using NMI.

    When you press or release a key a scan code is generated. The keyboard driver will receive this scan code. It does not matter how the keyboard driver knows there is a code available - it could have received a (normal) interrupt or it could just poll the keyboard. The driver (software) maintains flags indicating the state of the special keys (shift., ctrl, alt). If a special key is pressed, the flag is turned on. If it is released the flag is turned off. If the driver sees that the code is a press of the 'delete' key, AND the flags for CTRL and ALT are on, it calls whatever special function is supposed to happen when ctrl-alt-delete is pressed. Otherwise, the scan code (and translated virtual key code) are placed in the input queue, to be handled by the application.

    There is NO special hardware processing of ctrl-alt-delete. Those keys are handled exactly like every other keypress, and the 'special meaning' of that combination is determined and acted on solely by software.

  207. Re: Redundant keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pedantry: It doesn't do a right-click. Rather, both the key in question (which I've always known as the "context menu key"...) and right-click generally pop up the context menu (aka "right-click menu", to some). But the right-click pops up the context menu of the element under the pointer, while the context menu key pops up the context menu of the currently focused element (without moving the pointer there), so it's wrong to say the context menu key "does a right-click".

  208. Re: Redundant keys by ti-85 · · Score: 1

    Number nine...

  209. what Gates should have said by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    A single "reboot me now!" key would have been a disaster

    yes, I agree...actually I don't see anything wrong with CTL+ALT+DEL at all just for the reason you stated

    Gate's answer to the question is silly and insulting kind of...that's my point...if Gates had said, in answer to the question:

    >"Zune"
    >"Making Internet Explorer locked down"
    >something about .NET
    >"nurturing our developers"

    answer like that are plausible...

    but like W., Gates is just a sort of bumbling figurehead...my greater point is that Gates's advice on these matters is wholly unuseful b/c he doesn't really have experience as a 'tech innovator' or 'computing pioneer'

    Gates knows how to fend off internal competition for his job, arrange divisions against each other in unhealthy competition, strategically bottleneck primary functions to coerce users into using all of your company's products, go decades without paying shareholder dividends, secure long-term governement contracts at no-bid, and probably best, he can show you how to **MAKE MILLIONS SELLING VAPORWARE**

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  210. Re:Redundant keys by master5o1 · · Score: 1

    Also because we're used to the right handed ways of the common set up.

    --
    signature is pants
  211. Re:Why was it a mistake? by guytoronto · · Score: 1

    Command-Control-Shift-3: Take a screenshot of the screen, and save it to the clipboard
    Command-Control-Shift-4, then select an area: Take a screenshot of an area and save it to the clipboard
    No file saved, just the image saved to the clipboard ready to paste into your document.

  212. Re: Redundant keys by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 2

    What's wrong with "You make a grown man cry"? "Start me up" FTW.

  213. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates is a fucking idiot with such a severe case of "not invented here" syndrome he created an alternate key combo rather than use the one that's LABELED on the FUCKING KEYBOARD?!

    There was no "SysRq" key on the original PC keyboard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Personal_Computer#Keyboard (click on the picture for a larger view) - It was added for the PC/AT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PC_keyboard

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  214. Re:Why not SysRq? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    That was to do it with the mouse, and on my first Mac I frantically searched through the documentation once to make sure I was doing the right thing.

    At some point, they changed it so the trash can turned into an "eject" symbol when dragging a volume. That made a lot more sense.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  215. Re:Redundant keys by steelfood · · Score: 1

    This is a work computer. It's probably joined to a domain, which requires all workstations ctrl-alt-delete to login. And there's probably some group policy that dictates the password prompt after the screensaver, which again, requires ctrl-alt-delete.

    Strange, I figure there'd be somebody who'd have pointed this out to you already. Either the Windows network admins have all been scared outta here, or they're hiding in a corner in shame.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  216. Re:Redundant keys by steelfood · · Score: 1

    We use it all the time:

    kill -9 2531696; exit

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  217. Re:BSOD by steelfood · · Score: 1

    BSOD is just a kernel dump. Every OS has its own kernel dump screen. The BSOD specifically is only an object of amusement because it happened with such frequency during the Win95 days. BSOD jokes reference the frustration of seeing one every 30 minutes, or 2 minutes after post if you accidentally botched your system in some way. And then from that point, it only got more frustrating because even after going through safe mode and trying to undo the error, you'd still end up having to reinstall Win95 from disc to clean your system out. And no, this was immediately before the prevelance of malware, especially screensaver malware, though viruses transmitted via floppy and diskette sharing were the trendy threat at the time.

    Seesh, kids these days, right?

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  218. Amiga by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    I miss how the Amiga keyboard was mapped. Left Amiga key + key was global system functions, Right Amiga key + key was in application functions. You could control the mouse with the keyboard if needed. I miss the Amiga clip board which actually worked as opposed to Windows 7 clipboard which works when it wants to. It's so spotty on my machine at work that I have to double ctrl c everything to make sure it's copied what I need.

    I really don't have a problem with Windows ctrl alt del, as others have pointed out it's obscure enough of a combination that you won't accidentally hit it.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  219. Screw Post-its by Zynder · · Score: 1

    I just use the combination to my luggage.

  220. Ever use a Nintendo? by Zynder · · Score: 1

    That's nothing! To get to the special functions of a Nintendo you needed Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A. That got old quick but man it was powerful!

  221. Re: Redundant keys by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    > SysReq would have been a better choice than alt-tab for switching programs when Windows came out,

    Incorrect. Alt-Tab can be done with the left hand staying close to the keyboard. Using SysReq would require moving the right hand off the home row.

  222. on mac... by Polo · · Score: 1

    I love love LOVE ctrl-option-cmd-eject (shutdown), ctrl-cmd-eject (reboot) and control-shift-eject (blank screen)

    I use them every single day.

  223. Re:Redundant keys by dargaud · · Score: 1

    Yes, a Dell Precision M6700, coming with Linux directly from Dell. It works fine with Linux with only the reboot command hanging (but not the reboot menu) and a few details like this menu key missing.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  224. Classic Windows Engineering by Schlacht · · Score: 1

    Arguably the most useful feature of a Windows workstation turns out to be a mistake. All I can say is, rm -rf /m$/*

    --
    rm -rf ms/*
  225. Re:Redundant keys by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    No it doesn't speed things up considerably.

    Yes it does, unless you use the hunt&peck method of typing.
    Trained typists use their pinkies for normal keys as well as the shift keys.
    Having to use different hand positions to type, for instance, "q" and "Q" slows them down.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  226. Back slash by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    What he needs to apologize for is the use of \ instead of using the standard / on every other system.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  227. Re:Redundant keys by dave420 · · Score: 1

    A good reason for *you*. Many Brits are perfectly fine with it. Don't confuse the notions of 'you' with 'everyone', as it makes you look a proper tit.

  228. Re:Redundant keys by Xest · · Score: 1

    I'm a lefty and I use my mouse with my left hand but to use the left hand shortcuts like ctrl+a, ctrl+c, ctrl+v etc. whilst still holding the mouse, I do this groundbreaking thing.

    I move my arm.

  229. Re: Redundant keys by PatrickNarkinsky · · Score: 1

    The reason you have to hit the three fingered salute to login is that the old orange book security standards required a key sequence that could not be interrupted by user space code to login for C2, or something like that. CAD was the only option ms had that couldn't be "spoofed"

  230. Re:Redundant keys by ais523 · · Score: 1

    Right Alt is pretty useful if you aren't American; it tends to be used to type a bunch of accented or non-ASCII characters in Europe, for instance (notably, the euro currency symbol, which is standardised as right alt+4 on all the major OSes at this point).

    --
    (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  231. Re:Redundant keys by ais523 · · Score: 1

    I use Caps Lock as my compose key, and fix two problems at once (not having a compose key, and hitting Caps Lock by mistake; hitting Compose by mistake is pretty minor, really).

    --
    (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  232. Re:Redundant keys by ais523 · · Score: 1

    Alt-e opens a menu whose name starts with E. AltGr-e is (on Windows, at least) a standard way to type é. So you can't really conflate the two.

    --
    (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  233. Re:Redundant keys by mattr · · Score: 1

    I found it very useful as the only toggleable key, in an art exhibit.

  234. Re:Redundant keys by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I am certain that I am fat enough to count for Two people on my own. Therefore a more accurate number is 225% I did have a big dinner tonight to account for the extra.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  235. Re:Redundant keys by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    As an older user I smell a porky pie. Why did M$ use ctrl alt delete to log in, as a marketing tactic to try to obfuscate the growing dissatisfaction of continually having to press ctrl alt delete as a result of BSODs often a several times a day occurrence and the older the install and the greater the use the more frequent the occurrence. As BSOD's ctrl alt delete's you were forced down the route of doing a complete re-install to stabilise the system. So ctrl alt delete to log in, psychologically obfuscates the impact of BSOD ctrl alt delete to attempt to use the system.

    This produced another feature of many different applications, the automatic timed save, to routinely save work every few minutes, those minutes being how much work you where willing to lose to routine BSOD ctrl alt delete's. Catch if it BSOD during the automatic save windows often managed to completely destroy the file on the way out, requiring the automatic save to be a different file name to the regular save but of course, 'really big but' the automatic save becomes redundant as you often had to reach back to yesterdays routine save because the time saved was destoyed by windows on it's way out to BSOD.

    M$ biggest mistake the Blue Screen Of Death, now for that M$ management of the day should spend the several next millennia roasting in the deepest pits of hell with the other betrayers. Looking back at that age I can wonder about how many 'years' not hours work windows cost me.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  236. The delete key would save civilization ... by GXB · · Score: 1

    Imagine if we had a way to start over each time we made a mistake, clear our heads of all the bad experiences and move ahead without the past baggage. It isn't the CTL-ALT-DEL keys that are important, (first off they were initially designed to reboot the computer), it is the fact that we as programmers design faults in to our systems and the complexity of having so many different programmers designing similar systems that are slightly different fosters anarchy. The real problem that has yet to be overcome is that computer science is not a science in the same way as all other established disciplines in the arts, sciences and trades. Until that happens several hundred years from now, we need a way to reboot from the errors in those experiments we call "programs" or "algorithms" or whatever.

  237. Re:Redundant keys by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It was still possible to distinguish a short contact from a longer one.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  238. Re:Redundant keys by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    A local supermarket was using little dumb green screen monitors until about 2 years ago. I think it said S/390 in the corner.

    Of the screen, not the supermarket.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  239. Re:Redundant keys by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Lefty myself ; mouse in left hand.

    I position the pointer, then start to type with both hands reasonably used. (No, I'm not a fully-trained touch typist ; but I did get more training than around 90% of my gender-generation group.) When I need to re-position the pointer, I switch modes from 'typing' to 'mousing' for the couple of seconds until I go back to being productive.

    I use left-Ctrl and left-Alt as left-Ctrl and left-Alt ; I've not assigned uses for right-Ctrl and right-Alt(Gr). That silly key with the menu on it, which brings up the context menu is rather the most used, and has no left-key equivalent. There's a key with a wavy flag on the left that doesn't nothing detectable ; maybe I'll assign that to duplicate the "menu" key.

    The annoying thing is that every other computer I work with during a day will have a different configuration of keyboards. You can't even rely on two consecutive systems being configured for the same language or character set.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  240. Re:Redundant keys by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Yes, except Ctrl-Alt-Del was invented at least a decade before CD's were available for computers.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  241. Windows Key by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Because putting the "Windows Key" between Ctrl and Alt isn't going to annoy PC gamers at all...

    Accidental windows key. Game interruption. Swearing. Game death.

  242. Re:Redundant keys by andrewa · · Score: 1

    I still have some motor instinct to use my left hand for CTRL+ALT and right hand for DEL when using a full-sized keyboard, although CTRL+ALT+DEL is certainly achievable using only your right hand on a full-sized keyboard.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  243. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    How early are you talking? As far back as I started using it, ctrl-alt-delete would start an orderly shutdown.