Slashdot Mirror


Keurig Stock Drops, Says It Was Wrong About DRM Coffee Pods

An anonymous reader writes: Green Mountain (Keurig) stock dropped by 10% this morning after a brutal earnings report. The reason? CNN Money reports that DRM has weakened sales of their Keurig 2.0. CEO Brian Kelley admits, "Quite honestly, we were wrong." Last year Green Mountain decided to make their new coffee machines work with licensed pods only. The company says they now plan to license more outside brands, and bring back “My K-Cup” reusable filters.

369 comments

  1. Well duh..... by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 1, Troll

    in other news, rain is wet.

    1. Re:Well duh..... by pem · · Score: 4, Funny
      in other news, Keurig is not Apple.

      FTFY

    2. Re:Well duh..... by derdesh · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not. In contrast to Green Mountain, Apple is making obscene amounts of profit.

  2. Yep, they were... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have been a loyal user of K-Cups for years now...

    I will never buy a DRM coffee machine...

    The whole idea is just stupid. I get that they are trying to make money from every cup sold, just like the razor model, but frankly that is a boardroom fantasy...

    ---

    The same issue with music happened... once Amazon started selling DRM free music, I started buying, now having a collection of hundreds of "CDs" all downloaded to all my devices.

    I don't pirate any of them, nor do I share them outside my family. Sell me a product I control at a reasonable price and I'll pay you money.

    Simple.

    1. Re:Yep, they were... by trout007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why I use a French press and a straight razor. Both will still be working in 25 years.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    2. Re:Yep, they were... by NoKaOi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The whole idea is just stupid. I get that they are trying to make money from every cup sold, just like the razor model, but frankly that is a boardroom fantasy...

      Exactly why I didn't buy one of these machines. I thought they were totally a-holes for making this move, but I gotta hand it to them, it's a rare thing for a business to admit that they were wrong. Good on them!

    3. Re:Yep, they were... by countSudoku() · · Score: 5, Funny

      How the hell do you get the razors to press?!?!?! I keep breaking the urn and my fingers are bleeding like crazy!!!!1!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    4. Re:Yep, they were... by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I will never buy a DRM coffee machine...

      Unless you're a prostitute, don't fuck your customer.

      You can get away with DRM on DVDs because consumers don't understand the tech. The phallus is invisible.

      You can't get away with DRM on a plastic cup with coffee grounds in it. The consumers UNDERSTAND that product, and KNOW you're fucking them. The phallus is very much visible.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    5. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except it's not really a good lesson to the marketplace if all is forgiven.... "Try DRM, if it works, great. If not, your former customers will forgive you and all's good."

      They should not be congratulated for recognizing how stupid they are. Let's congratulate and support the coffee maker companies who DIDN'T try this.

      We need to engender fear in the heart of every executive who would even CONSIDER this insanity. So I say fuck them-- let their company suffer from their idiocy and let others learn from their failure.

      If this news makes you want to reconsider a keurig machine, re-reconsider. There are plenty of other great alternatives. And that goes for printer makers and anyone else who's thinking about going in this direction.

    6. Re:Yep, they were... by oobayly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or accountant, or lawyer. Bonus for those who fucked their accountant and got their prostitute to do their tax return.

    7. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hello? They're not admitting they're wrong they're saying "pretty please don't destroy our business by not buying into our greed."

    8. Re:Yep, they were... by Wycliffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The whole idea is just stupid. I get that they are trying to make money from every cup sold, just like the razor model, but frankly that is a boardroom fantasy...

      With the exception of the DRM part, the rest of the 2.0 idea was somewhat sound. The idea that you could have a barcode which adjusted the brew temp, etc... depending on what was in the cup and have a larger cup so you could include creamer, etc.. If they would have just did that and made a better product and completely left off the DRM part then they might have actually had a sellable product and they could have even gotten the advantage of being able to hold off generics longer with renewed patents. By adding the DRM all they did was make sure that 2.0 was a complete flop.

    9. Re:Yep, they were... by NoKaOi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh hell, I just noticed this in the article: Keurig plans to bring back the My K-cup accessory to allow customers to brew other brands of coffee. Okay, but what about "unofficial" k-cups? I like to use k-cups that don't have the DRM, and I rarely use my own coffee grounds in the My K-cup accessory. Noticeably absent is them saying you can use non-DRM k-cups. Then again, reporters are idiots so they may not have bothered learning the difference between the My k-cup which allows you to use grounds vs non-DRM k-cups. But if they still don't accept non-DRM k-cups, then fuck 'em!

    10. Re:Yep, they were... by hax4bux · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly. And they are EMP proof. Bring on the apocalypse, I will be shaved and enjoying my coffee.

    11. Re:Yep, they were... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      sounds like you prefer a hot cup of beard-coffee in the morning?

      me, I like my coffee whisker-free.

      (whiskey is ok, on occasion, though).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    12. Re:Yep, they were... by EmeraldBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except it's not really a good lesson to the marketplace if all is forgiven.... "Try DRM, if it works, great. If not, your former customers will forgive you and all's good."

      They should not be congratulated for recognizing how stupid they are. Let's congratulate and support the coffee maker companies who DIDN'T try this.

      We need to engender fear in the heart of every executive who would even CONSIDER this insanity. So I say fuck them-- let their company suffer from their idiocy and let others learn from their failure.

      If this news makes you want to reconsider a keurig machine, re-reconsider. There are plenty of other great alternatives. And that goes for printer makers and anyone else who's thinking about going in this direction.

      In other words, you're advocating to never forgive them for their mistakes. If you can lead a huge multinational business and never make a single mistake, ever, then congratulations to you, but the rest of us are only human. The idea may have been stupid, yes, but everyone screws up at some points in their life. If they continue to make these choices, then yes, I'm sure people will switch, but one failed marketing line shouldn't prevent you from ever using their coffee makers again. Seems a shame to lose a very convenient and otherwise decent coffee maker over a petty grudge - although, since I don't own one, I am admittedly only assuming it's convenient.

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    13. Re:Yep, they were... by jrminter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Earlier this year our Keurig brewer needed to be replaced. Went to the store and got a new one. Got it home and our existing K-cups wouldn't work - they were the old version. Called Keurig - they told me they would replace my cups. Told them that wasn't good enough because I didn't want to worry every time we bought cups. The rep said there was nothing she could do. Told her she lost a customer for life.

      Took the brewer back, got a refund. Ordered a Mr Coffee version that is quite acceptable. Use whatever cups I want. Hope their management lose their jobs over this one. First rule of business is to treat your customers with respect or they (we) will find vendors who will. Interestingly enough, everybody figured out how to defeat their DRM. Keurig alienated customers and competitors found a workaround. Queue up Nelson Munch: "Haa Haa."

    14. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much exactly this.

      It has been shown constantly that most people that pirate would buy a product if it wasn't horrible crippled with anti-piracy nonsense, horrific DRM, machine-BREAKING DRM, machine-locked content and even region-locked content. (fuck that shit)
      Those that don't cannot be won over with any nice gestures. They will always pirate. And they are still a minority of that market.

      Piracy is just a market reaction to abusive practises. It is just like an overly large second hand market is usually because the entry level to buying new is stupidly high, high enough that most simply do not care for buying new. Cars especially, and now gaming is also facing this, and companies floated the idea of locked down machines, locked down disc IDs and all kinds of bullshit, and expectedly got blasted so hard that the head of Xbox Division was dropped so hard he got hired by Zynga. How awful. A fate worse than 27 and a half deaths.
      The worst part about ever-growing secondary markets is it DOES eat away at companies. It does. It actually works.
      The problem is most of these companies end up reacting with hostility, rather than trying to figure out where THEY went wrong, because it is obviously someone else's problem.
      So you end up with stupid shit like bail-outs, even more stupid restrictions, mass suing, overly-protective of IP, and so on.

      So, in conclusion: fuck you companies that do this. Fix your own shit company / products before you come after your consumer base.
      There is a reason they went with others: better product, cheaper product, probably even both since most companies that make a product and consumable add-on tend to have much higher prices for said consumables. WHY?! It doesn't work! It doesn't even work with Apple and they have the most dick-sucking consumer-base of most companies, fanboys that would suck the dust out of Steve Jobs grave to gain his charisma or some other weird bullshit.

      This is going to come back and bite them when people realize they are still being screwed over.
      Everyone make a fuss over it. Make Twitter-tier info pictures for morons and hipsters to get mad at.

    15. Re:Yep, they were... by xevioso · · Score: 1

      ...and why I do not shave and drink tea.

    16. Re:Yep, they were... by xevioso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not an issue of a mere mistake. It's primarily a bad business decision, but also a very cynical one. I can forgive the bad business decision...companies make those all the time. It's the TYPE of business decision it was, which was an attempt to hijack choice away from consumers, which affects people personally when they use this machine for their coffee. That's something people will have a hard time forgiving.

    17. Re:Yep, they were... by xevioso · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well actually, they were literally admitting they were wrong. Literally.

    18. Re:Yep, they were... by Imagix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have to disagree with you. This wasn't a case of "hey, let's try this new, innovative thing" followed by "whups, unintended consequences, we need to stop doing that". This was a case of "Hey, those printer ink guys can get away with this stunt, and the software guys can get away with this stunt. So what if the actual consumers of both of those things abhor the idea. We're gonna do it anyway because more $$$$!" followed by "Oh wait, our customers have a choice to do something else with their coffee, so they're not buying our stuff anymore. Well, lets put out a 'oops' statement, and perhaps let a few more people use our DRM thingy." There needs to be _punishment_ for this. A failed marketing line was New Coke. This is quite a bit different.

    19. Re:Yep, they were... by hey! · · Score: 1

      My doctor told me to drink a cup of tea after a hot bath...

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    20. Re:Yep, they were... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      It's very well understood that DVDs can't be copied. This is considered reasonable. While the restriction on coffee grounds considered unreasonable.

      But I'd propose an alternative: Keurig 2.0 is going nowhere mostly because the only real advantage it has is the ability to brew pots of coffee. A lot of people simply aren't interested in doing that, much less willing to pay more/give up more countertop space for the privilege.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    21. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it wasn't really a "mistake". It was a really, really, bad decision made by ? number of corporate suits (more profits, yay), ? number of marketing research gurus (customers won't care), and ? number of lawyers (it's okay, everybody does it). Calling it a mistake makes it seem more like something done on a whim and/or without thinking things through. I'll bet the decision was driven solely by profit and that it was carefully thought about by numerous people. Not a bit of common sense involved, but it was thought about a lot by a lot of people. Oh, and those people are still running the company. Investors beware!

    22. Re:Yep, they were... by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      I have the same attitude about government. The leviathan is just an organization with perfect DRM (and ARM).

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    23. Re:Yep, they were... by slew · · Score: 2

      In other words, you're advocating to never forgive them for their mistakes. If you can lead a huge multinational business and never make a single mistake, ever, then congratulations to you, but the rest of us are only human. The idea may have been stupid, yes, but everyone screws up at some points in their life. If they continue to make these choices, then yes, I'm sure people will switch, but one failed marketing line shouldn't prevent you from ever using their coffee makers again. Seems a shame to lose a very convenient and otherwise decent coffee maker over a petty grudge - although, since I don't own one, I am admittedly only assuming it's convenient.

      Well some of still believe huge multinational businesses aren't human beings therefore do not need or deserve forgiveness.

      If a business dies, another one will take over (or do you still buy your drygoods from FW woolworths and not Amazon). Sure it might be a shame that some people lose their jobs, but it's not like we a shunning another human being from society where they starve and die. I'm not advocating holding petty grudges, but I'm saying we need not anthropomorphize corporations. Corporations are simply limited liability constructs created to facilitate the concentration of capital for investment purposes, not living entities that can have their feelings hurt.

      Although of course certainly employees of such an entity are human, they can (and usually do) associate with different companies over a lifetime. For most individual humans, your identity is constant for your lifetime, you cannot easily make a fresh start (w/o moving to a new place and with the internet maybe not even moving will help) and concepts like forgiving a mistake makes more sense (although I'm sure there will be many that debate this for some individuals).

      So maybe a corporation is more like a family? Corporations dump their leaders on occasion (often do with bad news). Why not have this leader (Mr Kelley) dive off with a golden parachute for approving this mistake (maybe he could get one of his old jobs back at Coca-cola or North American Van Lines, GE, Ford or Procter and Gamble) to attempt to regain trust? If a family was known for doing that would you even forgive them? Maybe this is better at illustrating how corporations don't deserved any sympathies granted to humans, right?

    24. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, and Keurig has revealed that it is run by evil greedy trolls. They cannot recover from that image.

    25. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I could never finish the bath before it got cold.

    26. Re:Yep, they were... by GrandCow · · Score: 1

      Even the disposable razor market has off-brand options. I can get sets of mach3 blades for 1/3-1/2 the name brand price by going with store brand at HEB.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    27. Re:Yep, they were... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Eh, the wife wanted one. Doesn't take any more space than a regular drip coffee maker.

      I got myself 4 of the "use your own grounds" cups, simply because a K-Cup only produces decent coffee when it is on the "small cup" setting. So you need to make 2 of 'em to get a decent cup of coffee. Average price, even with sales, etc. is 60 cents per kcup so $1.20 for one cup of coffee. A $5 container of grounds (10.something ounces by weight) I get about 2 weeks worth of coffee.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    28. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wrong about what? Because it doesn't sound like they're removing the DRM, it just sounds like they're letting third-parties use their DRM, and will be releasing their own reusable cup that, again, still uses the same DRM.

      Unless there is a way to turn off the DRM on the coffee makers they've already sold.

    29. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that it is not. The DRM on DVDs doesn't prevent coping. Never has. Bit for bit copy copies the drm crap.

      It's never, even before DeCSS prevented coping. It did prevent transcoding, and playback on machines. They were trying to control the playback market. (Also, why the cheap chinese crapboxes were BETTER than the expensive ones, you could skip things.)

      Only affects playback. Has never been about preventing copying. They wanted to control how people who bought it watched it.

    30. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mmmmhhh, smoov cheeks just like a lay-dee /apocolypse hillbilly cackle

    31. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To enforce region codes, you're suggesting? Just the idea is ridiculous. It was there to prevent copying. This was particularly true when double-layer DVD burners were unavailable/prohibitively expensive, as was the case many years after DVDs were mainstream.

      And generic Chinese DVD players were total shit, OMG. The way to do it was just enter the unlock code on normal DVD players you bought at the store, which was trivial. But really who gives a fuck, because unless you're into importing foreign editions of DVDs, most people would never have any reason to ever use one.

    32. Re:Yep, they were... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I meant that Keurig 2.0 had few advantages over Keurig 1.0.

      Personally I like drip coffee, but when I wake up at 7 in the morning I appreciate being able to just press a button and getting a decent (if not great) cup.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    33. Re:Yep, they were... by hawguy · · Score: 4

      I will never buy a DRM coffee machine...

      Unless you're a prostitute, don't fuck your customer.

      Or Apple -- you lock in your customers all you want if you're Apple.

    34. Re:Yep, they were... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't just a "mistake", DRM is an abhorrent violation of the most fundamental consumer rights. The shattered and flayed corpses of companies that go down that road should be left impaled along the roadways as a warning to the next TEN GENERATIONS not to fuck with this.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    35. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was greed. The old saying goes: You can sheer a sheep many times, but you can only skin it once.

    36. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Here's why: they were always this way (since their rebirth). I'm sure Tassimo and Nespresso are doing just fine. They started with a closed system and people accepted it.

      Keurig put DRM on their non-DRM product.

      The moral of the story? Open sourcing is a one-way street. Don't you open source your product, don't ever think of close sourcing it.

    37. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All you have to do is put a label from a licensed k-cup over the non-license one. Works great. My brother got one of the drm machines for Christmas.

    38. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, bit-for-bit copies do not copy the DRM. Regular DVD recordable media specifically does not support CSS. The exception is "Authoring" media, which only works with special Authoring recorders that do not work with regular recordable DVD discs. This was clearly due to paranoia by the movie industry. Of course they never expected that their encryption would not only be broken, but trivially, meaning that the CSS information is not necessary to make a copy.

      http://pioneerdvd.rpc1.org/Gen...

    39. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and doing this probably makes you a criminal under the DCMA laws, since you are circumventing the manufacturer's DRM. What's the difference between doing what you're saying and ripping/DeCSS'ing/and reburning a DVD movie?

      They need to get rid of the DRM all together in order to save face, otherwise they are not really sorry. Otherwise, they are just going to gouge the other K-Cup manufacturers to license their DRM, who will in turn raise the prices of their generic/alternate brand KCups to pay for the DRM licensing and Kurigg will make money on their DRM scheme still.

    40. Re:Yep, they were... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "It's very well understood that DVDs can't be copied."

      I have spent a lot of time educating people that that is actually a lie and you can copy them. and giving people the tools to do exactly that on their computers.

      Been doing that for over 10 years now. Now I show them how to do it to DVD's and Blurays. Education empowers you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    41. Re:Yep, they were... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      My doctor told me to not look away and dont blink.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    42. Re:Yep, they were... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      There needs to be _punishment_ for this.

      There will be. As long as they include DRM, less people will buy their coffeemakers, because they don't want to worry about whether a K-cup is licensed or not. They can either be happy selling the coffeemakers or they can blow their coffee out their arse. I mean, fuck a Keurig crap coffee anyway, but still. I wouldn't buy a DRM coffee bean to put into my grinder, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:Yep, they were... by Spamalope · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They tried to screw us consumers, and we were able to stop them. They didn't think better of it and stop, it's purely that they couldn't profit from it.

    44. Re:Yep, they were... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Tell that my my lexmark toner carts.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    45. Re:Yep, they were... by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In other words, you're advocating to never forgive them for their mistakes.

      How about we forgive them when they fire the people responsible for "mistakenly" deciding to intentionally screw their customers?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    46. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get away with DRM on DVDs because consumers don't understand the tech.

      McDonalds, Big Tobacco, Walmart, Coca-Cola, et al have all been fucking their customers for decades. The entire 'convenience' concept depends upon the blissful ignorance of non-enlightenment, disregard for basic health and environmental consequence. All this crap about education and critical thinking skills has been a farce since the 70's when it was obvious that Reduce, Reuse & Recycle had failed because or the generation gap. 50 years later and we're debating whether single serving coffee 'pods' make sense strictly from the standpoint of corporate profit and marketing success?!

      WTF people...

    47. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is now my new life goal.

    48. Re:Yep, they were... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      My wife loves her Keurig. (Like yours, the non-DRM version.) She got two reusable cups to use with it. She can buy whatever coffee she likes, put it in the reusable cup, brew her coffee, and then clean the filter out for the next cup. Keurig's DRM would have prevented this and would have forced her to buy only Keurig-approved coffee. We'd rather leave the "Keurig ecosystem" entirely. Keurig doesn't have a monopoly on coffee.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    49. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's not really a good lesson to the marketplace if all is forgiven.... "Try DRM, if it works, great. If not, your former customers will forgive you and all's good."

      They should not be congratulated for recognizing how stupid they are. Let's congratulate and support the coffee maker companies who DIDN'T try this.

      We need to engender fear in the heart of every executive who would even CONSIDER this insanity. So I say fuck them-- let their company suffer from their idiocy and let others learn from their failure.

      If this news makes you want to reconsider a keurig machine, re-reconsider. There are plenty of other great alternatives. And that goes for printer makers and anyone else who's thinking about going in this direction.

      I wonder if the Keurig 2.0 also stops working after several thousand "prints"... er, cups of coffee.
      Some of those printers are known for the firmware in the printer (not just the cartridge life) stopping after a set number of pages printed.

    50. Re:Yep, they were... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      That Doctor's advice is always kind of wibbly-wobbly.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    51. Re: Yep, they were... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Forgiveness works with rational humans who function under ethics, but corporations in capitalism aren't that. Corporations are psychopaths working to figure out ways to take advantage of consumers. That is their modus operandi.

      We aren't advocating not forgiving the company, we are advocating making an example of the company so that the other psychopaths see there are real, severe consequences to this kind of behavior.

      Is that fair to GM? Maybe not, but neither is the rest of reality, and it is better for the rest of us that it is that way.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    52. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      funny you should mention that. did you know that there is a town in western australia, Mercy, where the people have entirely different tastes in their hot beverages from their fellow Aussies. seems that while tea brewed from Koala fur is not very popular in Australia, it does have a small following. however, as one might expect, most aussies like to brew the fur in a french press or melitta type pot, thus keeping the pieces of fur out of their hot drink. This is not true in Mercy. they brew the fur in an open pot of water, and serve the resultant brew straight, with plenty of fur in it. Thus, the Koala tea of Mercy is not strained.....

    53. Re:Yep, they were... by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 2

      I'm going to have trouble growing beans in Nova Scotia so I'm in the anti apocalypse camp despite a french press and a hand cranked ceramic burr grinder.

      --
      This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    54. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Lexmark suffered any... They used the DMCA to sue printer cartridge refill manufacturers around 10 years ago.... Under the provision that it was copyrighted code, and they were circumventing it.

    55. Re:Yep, they were... by aynoknman · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, enjoying the coffee grown from the coffee plantation across the street?

      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    56. Re:Yep, they were... by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      I have a drip coffee machine with a programmable timer. I just prepare everything and have a (couple of) perfect cup(s) in the morning for me and the missus \o/

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    57. Re:Yep, they were... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I've found that one K-Cup produces a third of a pot of coffee.

      I especially like 2 scoops of Kroger plus 1 K-Cup (Southern Pecan or Breakfast Blend). There is less coffee in the k-cup but it is ground much finer.

      I don't own a keurig brewing machine. But I work at a place that does. Sometimes, I'll brew a cup fpr the road and some times I'll just take a k-cup instead of brewing a cup.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    58. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the decision logic at Keurig went something along these lines: our customers are so stupid, that they can not make coffee manually and buy a single-use plastic item for each cup. So, they surely must be also stupid enough to buy a device that will brew only the crappy and expensive coffee bought from us.

    59. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard for them NOT to turn about. In canada, I suspect one of the big reasons people didn't jump to this 2.0 BS is because Tim Horton's k-cups were not approved. And lots and lots of Canadians need their Tims. The Tim's cups won't work in the 2.0? Well. No reason to buy a 2.0.

    60. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shear a sheep.

      Sorry, somebody had to. Might as well be me.

    61. Re:Yep, they were... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Exactly why I didn't buy one of these machines. I thought they were totally a-holes for making this move, but I gotta hand it to them, it's a rare thing for a business to admit that they were wrong. Good on them!

      The issue is they only said they were wrong because they lost money. If they had made money they'd all be hive fiving each other on their business acumen and other companies would soon follow with their own proprietary DRM systems.

    62. Re: Yep, they were... by LoneTech · · Score: 1

      Even the DMCA has exceptions regarding interoperability, which this falls under, and using a third party peripheral is not a copying act. If you want to stretch it, this is more akin to buying an off-brand gameboy cartridge; but even there copyright wasn't enough for the draconian desires of the maker, which is why every cartridge is forced to display the brand logo on startup. This was because trademark law was more enforceable, but that abuse is invalid in many regions due to the aforementioned interoperability concerns. There are lots of things wrong with DMCA, but trying to equate third party accessories with copying is pretty nasty FUD, not truth.

      In Keurig's position, the thing to do would be to remove the defect from newly built machines, publish a tag to be used on unbranded cups, and preferably also make that tag available as a free sticker at retailers for people who're already burnt by the defective machines.

    63. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could, I dunno, grow a beard? Or let your armpits get fuzzy?

    64. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      double bonus if you got a prostitute as your tax refund

    65. Re:Yep, they were... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      It depends on how long the apocalypse lasts. It's not hard to store two or three years worth of green coffee beans and roast them when you need them. Two years is the max time usually recommended, but I think they would last at least 50% longer than that, albeit with somewhat less quality.

      I roast my own coffee. What is a K-cup?

    66. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They absolutely deserve punishment for trying this customer-unfriendly nonsense. It's not about personal forgiveness, it's "pour encourager les autres".

    67. Re:Yep, they were... by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 1

      Though honestly, you could only sheer a sheep once. It just wouldn't be pretty. :-)

      --
      je suis parce que j'aime
    68. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think a K-cup is something a very large lady wears. And they don't like Damned Randy Men.

    69. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you get sued by them anyway, pay a lawyer to counter it, and win, and are down several grand for it.

      This is not acceptable.

    70. Re:Yep, they were... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      it's a rare thing for a business to admit that they were wrong

      not really, they were wrong a lot and said nothing, it was only when they had a profit warning that they were forced to say what had happened and this made them admit their fault.

      If sales had held up even slightly, you would only have heard how great DRM was.

    71. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DRM isn't copyrighted.

      DRM on DVDs have NEVER stopped copyright infringement on the DVDs. They've only and CAN only stop playback.

      It doesn't stop copyright infringement, and doesn't stop "Piracy" at all.

    72. Re:Yep, they were... by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Companies tend to do way better when their intent isn't to screw customers. Steve Jobs was a delusional, but he believed locking down the software and forcing it to only work on Apple hardware provided the best user experience for the customer. That works out well for the company making the hardware, but the company didn't look for the money first and implement the product second. Keurig saw companies making money by lock-in and thought that lock-in was what it needed to do. Instead, it needed to make the best coffee pods. It needed to make them so much better that customers wouldn't want to use other coffee pods. If that involved lock-in, customers would have been fine with it. As it happens, the secret isn't the pods, it's the coffee, and lots of other people know that too, so lock-in wasn't ever a viable option, unless your goal was to piss off your customers.

      Start making products people want, and they'll be happy to be locked-in with you.

    73. Re:Yep, they were... by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      No you can't. "Sheer" isn't a verb. It can be an adj, an adv, or a noun. Unless you mean splitting the sheep in half in which case you are just as at fault as the GP as that would still be "shear."

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    74. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So open-source IS viral, and it's like AIDS. Once your infected, you can never get rid of it.

    75. Re:Yep, they were... by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Went and bought a 2.0 machine not knowing there was a difference.

      Ended up returning it the next day... also bought a Mr. Coffee K-cup machine.

      Way to fail, Keurig.

    76. Re:Yep, they were... by houghi · · Score: 1

      What I read was: We licenced wrong, so we are going to licence differently.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    77. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they'd all be hive fiving each other

      Bee serious!

    78. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How often will you forgive your girlfriend for having cheated on you before you finally dump her ?

    79. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention better for the environment

    80. Re:Yep, they were... by jbengt · · Score: 1

      No you can't. "Sheer" isn't a verb.

      So how do you get the wool off the sheep?

    81. Re:Yep, they were... by jbengt · · Score: 1

      According to Dictionary.com, it can be a verb.
      also
      here

    82. Re:Yep, they were... by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      I just got a six pack of reusable cups for less than $10 on Amazon for my Keurig 1.0. That way I don't even have to worry about washing them every day, just toss them in the dishwasher once a week when I'm already going to run it. Saves money and is incredibly convenient, I can't believe that they were dumb enough to not even make an official reusable cup at their normal absurdly high prices.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    83. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    84. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the same reason I will not buy Amazon videos. I can't watch them on my linux PC so they are useless to me. I can however pirate and get the videos I want for nothing...they don't seem to understand I want to pay, but your service isn't available.

      Note: Not saying I do pirate, just that I could, very easily. Usually just go without an spend my money where it conforms to my needs.

    85. Re:Yep, they were... by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so there is a 1600s era verb form of "sheer" referring to navigating a ship that was probably an incorrectly used "shear" anyway. Still not relevant to an action one can do to a sheep.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    86. Re:Yep, they were... by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      You shear it.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    87. Re:Yep, they were... by neurovish · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have trouble growing beans in Nova Scotia so I'm in the anti apocalypse camp despite a french press and a hand cranked ceramic burr grinder.

      Don't worry, Nova Scotia will be a tropical climate by then. Perfect for growing coffee.

    88. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still buy shoes at FW Woolworth's

    89. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Horton's k-cups were not approved.

      That was viewed as an act of war up there.

    90. Re:Yep, they were... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      that's not punishment. punishment would restitute the abuse of trust that manifested in keureg marketshare that gave them the opportunity to make such a selfish decision

    91. Re:Yep, they were... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      It's very well understood that DVDs can't be copied. This is considered reasonable. While the restriction on coffee grounds considered unreasonable.

      But I'd propose an alternative: Keurig 2.0 is going nowhere mostly because the only real advantage it has is the ability to brew pots of coffee. A lot of people simply aren't interested in doing that, much less willing to pay more/give up more countertop space for the privilege.

      movies are not a product of the earth and are not something that was here before someone came along and harvested the movie. additionally, I cannot grow my own movies and naturally have the same product.

      Keurig has every right to place DRM checking into the brewers. And we have every right to get rid of it

    92. Re:Yep, they were... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Once they removed the drm from music and dropped the price to where it was reasonable, around 10 bucks a cd, then it became easier and better to just buy the music.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    93. Re:Yep, they were... by FacePlant · · Score: 1

      I use a safety razor because I use my french press too often to trust my face to a stright razor in these shaky hands.
      Blades are cheap enough that I don't balk at buying them.

      --
      My Heart Is A Flower
    94. Re:Yep, they were... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with you. This wasn't a case of "hey, let's try this new, innovative thing" followed by "whups, unintended consequences, we need to stop doing that". This was a case of "Hey, those printer ink guys can get away with this stunt,

      The printer ink guys didn't get away with it. They went to court, and were told that the DMCA didn't mean what they thought it meant. Their biggest problem was that nobody actually copied their software, so their argument failed completely.

    95. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought my wife a K-cup device this year. Already knowing what the "2.0" was all about, a Keurig brand was not one I even considered. I passed right by their offerings and bought a Mr. Coffee.

      It's a shame, because I probably would have bought their product otherwise.

    96. Re:Yep, they were... by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      ah yes - I had a similar experience. Little known is the quality of the Keurig. They stop working. My previous one had to be replaced after 5 years - and the replacement is 2 years old. However my old style Filter "Mr coffee" pot still works after 15 years.

      The printer ink analogy comparison isn't quite right. You can't buy ink at the store. However you can buy coffee everywhere - it existed before K-cups. It is an industry by god! While the grocery store now stock mostly K-cups -- coffee is available from plenty of shops. Their failure was attempting to DRM something regularly available from other sources. Maybe like music - you can buy CDs..but Apple made it dirt easy to buy. Did Keurig make it easy to *buy* coffee? (brew/make it --- yes). Now it is harder to buy - and more expensive. And they didn't solve the Eco problem.

      But the point is...my experience around K-cup 2.0 is like yours. When I go to the store to buy cups it has become confusing. At least they gave them a different name. People buy me coffee as a present - v1.0 cups thankfully because that's all they know.

      Recently we switched to a refillable K-cup and buy bulk coffee. The TCO hasn't been very good for these machines. Expensive up front purchase, expensive coffee pods, and relatively short life. Couple that with the new machine forcing you to buy the even-more expensive pods - and I just didn't see a reason to switch.

      Thankfully some innovators have made a reusable coffee pod device that fits in the native hole. The one Keurig provides is a PITA to operate.

      v1.0 doesn't exactly make the best tasting coffee. I heard v2.0 was better...but the cost doesn't make sense.

    97. Re:Yep, they were... by PyrousLavawalker · · Score: 1

      This is starting to sound like a Monty Python skit LOL

    98. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cheap normal coffee maker is so incredibly easy to use, I can't imagine why anyone would buy one of these. I assume they think that it's cool or they like whatever flavors they offer. As for me, I much prefer to just add flavored creamer to the coffee I make myself.

    99. Re:Yep, they were... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Keurig has every right to place DRM checking into the brewers. And we have every right to get rid of it

      Actually, it's CRM - coffer right management :-)

      Their problem is (apart from upsetting people who buy their coffee makers) that as long as you don't copy the software in their machines, which you obviously wouldn't want to anyway, there is nothing in their machines that is actually in fact protected by the DMCA. They are in the same situation as Lexmark was. When they read the DMCA they read "...yadda yadda yadda encryption yadda yadda yadda protected yadda yadda yadda..." but they didn't bother actually reading the other words. Just because there is encryption _somewhere_ in your product doesn't mean you can prevent people from doing things.

      This is like having a DVD player that plays encrypted DVDs just fine, and using it to play unencrypted DVDs. DMCA cannot stop you from doing that.

    100. Re:Yep, they were... by beschra · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't live in the US of A where verb is a verb.

      --
      It is unwise to ascribe motive
    101. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jest, but I do prefer an old fashioned safety razor / double edged over the modern stuff. Mostly the single blade design is much cheaper (we're talking around 15 cents a decent blade) and much less likely to clog. All the multibladed stuff spits a fit when dealing with nondaily shavers - the more blades, the more fussy and uncloggy is 10x the bother.

      Also I'm the type to get razor burn on my neck with a "modern" razor. My shaves are just as close with a safety, but without that BS, after I learned how.

      The one good thing about a modern razor is the tilting head allows you to relatively safely shave where you can't see. So places other than the face.

    102. Re:Yep, they were... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Well some of still believe huge multinational businesses aren't human beings therefore do not need or deserve forgiveness.

      Then they don't deserve punishment either. You can't have it both ways. Anything that's a valid target for revenge/punishment/whatever is also a valid target for forgiveness, because the first approximation of forgiveness means cancelling or at least mitigating said negative consequences.

      I'm not advocating holding petty grudges, but I'm saying we need not anthropomorphize corporations. Corporations are simply limited liability constructs created to facilitate the concentration of capital for investment purposes, not living entities that can have their feelings hurt.

      I'm not so sure of it. Biology has a term called superorganism, which seems to fit human organisations. That is, a corporation - or a club, a church, a nation, or whatever - is a kind if distributed organism that piggybacks on its member's brains; a kind of memetic lifeform, if you will. Furthermore, as technology and culture advance these superorganisms seem to be getting more efficient and coordinated. I suspect we'll reach true maturity as a species when the process leads them to gain self-awareness, and us meatbags to recognize which parts of our mind are actually manifestations of, say, the American spirit or Anonymous.

      But whatever the truth about the metaphysical status of organizations might be, it can nonetheless be quite useful to anthropomorphize them. A person who's merely pursuing his self-interest will end up using corporate veil to act as a psychopath, because it shields him from consequences; whereas one who's proud to serve Coffee Business, Inc. might well turn down a DRM scheme on the grounds that it'd insult his patron's honour, even if it would seem to be profitable in the short term.

      It's usually more efficient to work with human instincts than against them. And one of the strongest human instincts is the desire to belong to a tribe. So, why not anthropomorphize a company? That way, it can and will be held to the same moral standards as any human being, and in return get some of the same loyalty as nation-states get, as long as it treats its employees decently. It's refusal to anthropomorphize that's the odd aberration, which has led to byzantine and ever-expanding legal texts attempting (and failing) to enumerate badness.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    103. Re:Yep, they were... by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      You know you've had enough coffee when you can thread a sewing machine while it's running.

    104. Re:Yep, they were... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Start making products people want, and they'll be happy to be locked-in with you.

      And this exactly explains why so many iPhones and iPads keep getting sold...

      Android is a confusing mess to the average consumer, Apple is not...

      Even myself, a technical person, has gone to the iPhone due to the whole "it just works" aspect.

      Multiple generations of Android phones, from the Moto Droid, to the Droid 3, to the Galaxy S3, S4, etc...

      All of them had issues, had to be restarted, etc.

      The iPhone? It works 100% of the time, all the time, without a hitch.

      It is slower, more expensive, and less capable than the Galaxy S6. And I don't care... and clearly neither do a whole lot of other people...

    105. Re:Yep, they were... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Ok, so there is a 1600s era verb form of "sheer" referring to navigating a ship that was probably an incorrectly used "shear" anyway. Still not relevant to an action one can do to a sheep.

      For the ship, thats a word from a different language that only sounds the same.

      When you use a pair of "shears" to cut the wool from a sheep, it is refered to as "shearing the sheep". The sheep usually survive! 8-)

      Just because you learned differently, does not mean that what you are accustomed to is either right or universal.

    106. Re:Yep, they were... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      WTF?

      When you hold a pot of coffee up to the sun, can you see light through it?

      Certainly 'barely colored water', not coffee!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    107. Re:Yep, they were... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      I have a drip coffee machine with a programmable timer. I just prepare everything and have a (couple of) perfect cup(s) in the morning for me and the missus \o/

      I also have a drip coffee machine, and I like the coffee it makes. But I also have a thermos caraff, with the old style vacume bottle for insulation. Pour the remaining coffee immediatly into that and have fresh coffee anytime over the next 6 hours or so, even easier than the Kureg. But does get a bit cooler before quitting time. 8-)

    108. Re:Yep, they were... by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      lexmark

      You can't, they went under

    109. Re:Yep, they were... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      the perils of autocomplete...

    110. Re:Yep, they were... by slew · · Score: 1

      Corporation may not deserve punishment, but what about the people that made the decisions? If the people making decisions are attempting to stand behind the anonymous shield of the corporation, does that negate that punishment can be attempted?

      If you think carefully of why you make any purchase from a corporation (be it single serve coffee, acetaminophen, or hamburgers), it's often related to brand and your personal view of their corporate history. Should a restaurant be punished for food poisoning you by you never visiting there again? How about if a restaurant bribes kids with happy meal toys? Or if the CEO directs the WinShape Foundation which contributes to causes you don't like? Why not boycott if the company doesn't happen to make you happy and their are other viable alternatives. Why should we forgive a faceless entity? It's not like it's a human.

      Even with humans we have institutionalized "revenge". Why even punish humans who commit crimes at all? It doesn't generally net out for society (e.g., look at the cost of the death penalty or even simple incarceration). Most animals don't seek revenge. Often businesses don't even do revenge (business is business as they say). Institutionalized revenge really is all about maintain civil society by bleeding away our desire for revenge. The issue you should be addressing isn't the target of the punishment (e.g., a company or a human), it's how/why to satisfying our desire to punish something or someone for insulting our sensibilities...

      FWIW, the organizers of our society have recognized there are different type of corporate organizations (e.g, non-profit, Benefit, or B-corporations, etc). But the "standard" type of corporation is really just a limited liability construct for the benefit of the owners (e.g., stock holders), nothing more, or less. You might even say a standard corp is more akin to a totally amoral superorganism (to use your terminology) than the other type of corps. You might imagine how you might relate to (or be afraid of) a human you knew to be amoral...

    111. Re:Yep, they were... by JimFive · · Score: 1

      In other words, you're advocating to never forgive them for their mistakes.

      Sony Root Kit.

      Yes, I am comparing these two things. The problem isn't that they tried a new product that failed, it is that the tried to make a change that deliberately harmed their customers.

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    112. Re:Yep, they were... by volmtech · · Score: 1

      They should have done what Kwik Loc did. They make the machine (and more impotently) the plastic tabs used to close produce bags and bread wrappers. They trademarked the shape of the tab and no other shape will work in their machine, no DRM needed.

    113. Re:Yep, they were... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      What specific "rights"?

      They have a right to make their machine work the way they want, you have the right to not buy it.

      BTW, the video at keurighack is hilarious, mostly because of the music.

    114. Re: Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "rare" in business because it's rarely judged better for the bottom line than lying, distorting, or avoiding in a time of crisis.

      I'm pretty sure the logic here wasn't, "Hey, if we're honest about this mistake, the stock will plunge and may never recover. But it's the right thing to do. Therefore it is what we shall do."

      ^This would be truly laudable. But I'm pretty sure that's not how the conversation went.

    115. Re: Yep, they were... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Nothing in the article demonstrates that they have learned the no DRM lesson. What was said is still compatible with them licensing the DRM to other ground coffee sellers.

    116. Re:Yep, they were... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's very rich and dark.

      Keep in mind, 1 kcup will make 10oz in the machine as it is. And from how well this works, I suspect there is more coffee than needed to make 10oz.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    117. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quote -----
      If this news makes you want to reconsider a keurig machine, re-reconsider. There are plenty of other great alternatives. And that goes for printer makers and anyone else who's thinking about going in this direction.
      unquote------

      On the subject of Printer ink cartridges . The price of OEM cartridges is often ,if not always, exorbitant.
      Fortunately in the UK and other countries reconditioned cartridges can be bought (usually on-line) for a fraction of the OEM cost . I use an Epson Photo printer and an Epson All-inOne printer/scanner using the same cartridges.
      A set of 6 reconditioned cartridges (providing excellent results)cost the same as 1 OEM made cartridge ......

    118. Re:Yep, they were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand that people using the Keurig DRM pods quickly found out that by reusing the bar coded top of the Keurig pod (fixing it to an alternative pod) enabled them to use that pod on the Keurig machine.

      It shows DRM defeats itself.............the same applies to reconditioned chipped printer cartridges.

    119. Re:Yep, they were... by t_ban · · Score: 1

      Worst pun ever :(

      --
      First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -Gandhi
  3. Plan to "license more outside brands"? by volkerdi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If their plan is to get more third parties to go along with their DRM, then they haven't really learned a thing yet.

    1. Re:Plan to "license more outside brands"? by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would say if they haven't started shipping units with the DRM disabled at the factory, they haven't yet gotten the message.

      Really they should do that and provide existing customers with a freedom clip if they want to salvage their sales (and stock value) for the year.

    2. Re:Plan to "license more outside brands"? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, they've learned a few things:

      1: People care about what brands of coffee they drink.
      2: Limiting choices there makes them look like the bad guy.

      They think (and may well be right...) that by making this apology and opening up the choices on what coffee people make using their coffeemakers, that people won't notice that they're still limiting their choices on coffeemakers.

      They've learned to pick their battles and manipulate opinion.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    3. Re:Plan to "license more outside brands"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps when their stock price reaches 10%, the message will have arrived?

      Ironically, captcha == riches

    4. Re:Plan to "license more outside brands"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a cow. A cow says moo. MOOOOOO! MOOO cow MOOOO! Moo says a cow. YOU COW!!

    5. Re:Plan to "license more outside brands"? by jason777 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and plus send a firmware update for existing machines.

    6. Re:Plan to "license more outside brands"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disabling the DRM is trivial. it involves removing two screws and cutting a single wire. Check on uTube.

    7. Re: Plan to "license more outside brands"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you know would update the firmware of their coffee machine ? Anybody who knows enough to update the firmware would know enough not to buy the machine in the first place...

    8. Re:Plan to "license more outside brands"? by TWX · · Score: 1

      I don't think it'll work. If there are salespeople in stores with more cup-based coffee makers than just Keurig, they'll probably continue to steer customers to those other makers.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. stuuupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Coffee is pouring hot water on ground beans. DRM'd Dispensers try to ignore that fact.

  5. Ahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck it.

    1. Re:Ahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Well said.

  6. Instead of DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they should have included Apps in their coffee apps so you could app while apping coffee! Or better yet, don't bother with coffee, and just brew more apps!

    Apps!

    1. Re: Instead of DRM... by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      No thanks. I don't like Java in my java.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  7. Hacked by LeadSongDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Turns out their DRM consists of a colored rim on the pod. Taping a used v2 lid on to a v1 pod is all it takes.

    --
    Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    1. Re:Hacked by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 0

      An RFID chip. Found in the ring. But you can also tape it to the outside of the machine, and it should work.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Hacked by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually special ink that fluoresces a particular way in infrared light.

      But yes, you can mod the machine by sticking the rim of a v2 K-cup inside it in the right place.

    3. Re:Hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instructions unclear. Burned fingers with scalding water. Isn't there a torrent or something?

    4. Re:Hacked by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Actually special ink that fluoresces a particular way in infrared light.

      Hmmm. If someone could replicate that ink, they might sell markers?

    5. Re:Hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is already a company that sells reusable k-cups with a sticker for 2 sides of the cup. Works great.

    6. Re:Hacked by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The FBI is on its way to arrest you as we speak.

    7. Re:Hacked by SharpFang · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter how trivial and stupid the DRM is - what matters is that circumventing it is illegal.

      Like these AudioCDs that had a data track that would auto-install some malware that breaks your CD writing capability. Circumventing it required holding shift down while inserting the disk, to prevent autoplay from starting. The guy who published that information was arrested for "providing tools for circumvention of DRM".

      Their whole DRM could have consisted in a single notch in the edge, and as result placing scissors next to the coffee maker would make you a felon.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    8. Re:Hacked by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Which law makes circumventing it illegal?

    9. Re:Hacked by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      .... The guy who published that information was arrested for "providing tools for circumvention of DRM".....

      Link or it didn't happen.

    10. Re:Hacked by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      you just tape the v2 pod lid to the top of the inside of the v2 brewer. youtube for videos of people doing this

    11. Re:Hacked by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw other stuff after I posted. Including the 'cut the green wire' hack, which seems to be the best, and then some guy who's hacked the firmware.

    12. Re:Hacked by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how trivial and stupid the DRM is - what matters is that circumventing it is illegal.

      The DRM is on Keurig's coffee pods. If you couldn't brew them in another coffee machine, and you circumvented that, that _might_ be illegal. But you are buying DRM-free coffee. There is nothing in the DMCA that prevents you from doing that. Like it may be illegal to play DVDs with DRM without permission, but it isn't illegal to play DVDs without DRM, and that's what people are doing.

    13. Re:Hacked by SharpFang · · Score: 1
      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    14. Re:Hacked by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall finding a kernel module 10 years ago that would signal to brew coffee when your machine booted. I suppose hacking the coffee machine is another option

    15. Re:Hacked by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Where in the long list of notes you linked does it say Edward Felten was "arrested"? Everything there is in reference to a civil suite in regards to him and his team publishing details on weaknesses in audio watermarking, which has nothing to do with the Sony rootkit debacle. Civil suits are not the same as criminal preosecutions, and you don't get arrested just because someone sues you.

      Felten's Wikipedia page has references to his involvement with the rootkit investigation, but no mention of arrests. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... Sony was on the receiving end of many civil actions for that SNAFU. There were a lot of jokes at the time of arresting people for selling Sharpie markers as DRM circumvention tools.

    16. Re:Hacked by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, I would argue that bypassing the Sony rootkit is not a felony under the DCMA because, by my reading of section B below, the Sony rootkit does not "effectively control access to a work" because audio CDs with this DRM scheme will work perfectly adequately in a CD player, or Linux or Mac computers where the rootkit can not execute. Since the rootkit is not required to operate to gain access to the work under most circumstance, bypassing it should not be illegal under the special circumstance of playing the CD on a Windows PC.

      Section 103 (17 U.S.C Sec. 1201(a)(1)) of the DMCA states:

              No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

      The Act defines what it means in Section 1201(a)(3):

              (3) As used in this subsection—

              (A) to "circumvent a technological measure" means to descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without the authority of the copyright owner; and
              (B) a technological measure "effectively controls access to a work" if the measure, in the ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the work.

    17. Re:Hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DMCA

  8. I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally I'd like to see the environmental nightmare of the Keurig and Tassimo curl up and die.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 4, Informative

      This. It is rather ridiculous that people use these non recyclable "K-cups" instead of a french press or just a pot of coffee.
      Billions of those cups, with the grounds still in them, filling up landfills, right when were trying to get away from crap like that.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    2. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by lophophore · · Score: 4, Interesting

      nespresso is even worse the k-cup. Though they both are pretty bad. an awful lot of waste for some convenience.

      me? I grind my own beans and put them into the portafilter of my 20-year-old Saeco espresso machine -- it won't die. The only waste is the spent coffee, and I feed that to my compost heap.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    3. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Noxal · · Score: 1

      There's also the fact that Keurig/Tassimo coffee tastes awful. If you brew with beans that were ground more than a few minutes before you add water you're doing it wrong.

    4. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally I'd like to see the environmental nightmare of the Keurig and Tassimo curl up and die.

      I own a keurig and a half dozen reusable pods that I throw in the dishwasher. I actually waste less coffee, coffee filters, etc.. now that I own a keurig and I like that I can make a single cup of coffee in the morning without any waste. I used the 20 pods that came free with my keurig but I haven't bought any since. I don't understand why people continue to buy those overpriced pieces of plastic when the same exact coffee is a fraction of the cost. Are people really that lazy that they can't spend 3 seconds dumping the old grounds in the trash?

    5. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by countSudoku() · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was not liking that either, but there's a brand at Costco (San Fran I think) that makes fully biodegradable k-kup compatible single serves. The bottoms are just filter, and the top is a corn-plastic ring and some kind of high-strength paper. Works great, dolphins agree!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    6. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by zlives · · Score: 1

      and if you want convenience... (i am lazy) super automatic machines are available that store, grind, press and deliver coffee at a push button. why a cup... i never got that either.

    7. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by zlives · · Score: 2

      people are lazy, but the advertising and marketing of disposable items for extraordinary profit is partially to blame as well.

    8. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 2

      Personally I'd like to see the environmental nightmare of the Keurig and Tassimo curl up and die.

      Enh, I've always used a filter basket and normal coffee grounds with my Keurig. I love the thing personally. I have an older one without DRM silliness. They really are nice appliances when used intelligently.

    9. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      I don't understand why people continue to buy those overpriced pieces of plastic

      For the same reason you see these same people with 2 x crates of over priced bottled water in their cart.
      I don't understand it either.

    10. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by justthinkit · · Score: 3, Informative

      This. Luckily I think this (horrible, nasty, awful taste) will help sink the whole Keurig ship.

      I prefer strong coffee. Impossible to make in a Keurig, because you don't control the ratio of coffee to water. There is a cup size setting -- I set it to the smallest cup, assuming that would extract the most coffee essence per ounce -- but that still didn't make it strong enough for me. I was also trying it with my preferred blend (in a reusable K-cup) and it tasted bloody awful. I would rather eat my group coffee. Seriously.

      I think the only people using these regularly are people without taste buds...and the corporate world where they are happy people aren't spending 10 minutes making a cup of coffee.

      K-Cups are a weapon of mass destruction, accounting for 1% of landfill waste.

      --
      I come here for the love
    11. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      people are lazy, but the advertising and marketing of disposable items for extraordinary profit is partially to blame as well.

      I don't understand this either. You would think that the off brand coffees would help cause a race to the bottom but even the offbrand pods are extremely expensive. Is the cost of production really that high (and therefore a low profit margin) or has everyone colluded together to keep their profit margins high?

    12. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      Personally I'd like to see the environmental nightmare of the Keurig and Tassimo curl up and die.

      I own a keurig and a half dozen reusable pods that I throw in the dishwasher. I actually waste less coffee, coffee filters, etc.. now that I own a keurig and I like that I can make a single cup of coffee in the morning without any waste. I used the 20 pods that came free with my keurig but I haven't bought any since. I don't understand why people continue to buy those overpriced pieces of plastic when the same exact coffee is a fraction of the cost. Are people really that lazy that they can't spend 3 seconds dumping the old grounds in the trash?

      I only have one reusable pod, but I find it works just dandy at work. I have a french press at home, but at work I don't have the resources to clean out a french press, and a standard coffee maker usually results in the coffee burning away all day, and no one cleaning out the machine. Single serve coffee works great in this situation.

      But why would I pay $0.50-$1.00 per cup of disposable Keurig, when I can pay $2 for a reusable pod, and $8 for a kg of ground coffee

    13. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by irrational_design · · Score: 2

      Well, that is true. But I don't drink coffee and now that we have a Keurig machine at work I have the admin get hot chocolate and apple cider cups for myself. So... I'm destroying the environment while drinking a tasty beverage. Such a first world thing to do.

    14. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by mschuyler · · Score: 2

      It does work just fine. Unfortunately the coffee they use in them is terrible. I have a whole box of French Roast that is unpalatable.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    15. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by adolf · · Score: 2

      My boss has a Keurig machine, and he keeps stock of my favorite coffee pods (he is a good boss).

      So to me, it's not about waste (the dumpster empties itself every Monday, and costs him the same whether full or empty), and it's not about the expense (I offered to give him money once, and it insulted him so I stopped doing that).

      There is a science to coffee brewing, and the first part of that is starting with fresh beans and much of the rest is consistent temperature and brewing time and good water.

      The Keurig system does a pretty good job on freshness (they keep ambient oxygen out), and does an excellent job on temperature and brewing time, and the filter on the faucet in the shop kitchen does a decent job making tap water tasty.

      This all conspires to mean that every cup of Newman's Own Medium Roast Breakfast Blend tastes just like the one I had earlier today. Or last week. Or last year. Or two years ago, when he had a completely different Keurig machine.

      To me, the taste of the end result is the advantage of pre-filled, disposable pods: It always produces an excellent cup of coffee. Nevermind the convenience: I can walk in the back door of the shop, start a cup of coffee in about 20 seconds, say Hi to the boss and go get my to-go cup in a couple of minutes later.

      Of course, my situation is unique since I have no material or waste expense with the boss's Keurig. At home, we go through a few 10-cup drip-brewed thermal carafes of coffee a day. Sometimes if we expect company during the day we fire up the antique 60-cup percolator. We seldom feel that we've wasted any coffee. But the stuff I make at home, though very tasty and much, much cheaper is never as consistent as the boss's Keurig.

    16. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by praxis · · Score: 1

      People want to firms making these machines to curl up and die not because of intelligent users like yourself. They have the desire because of the masses of people who buy disposable, non-recyclable, non-reusable plastic cups of bad coffee, in the manner *that these companies want people to use them*.

      The standard use case is a vastly wasteful enterprise, and designed to be that way.

    17. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by asolidvoid · · Score: 1

      If you feel like giving them another shot, our office uses these pods and we have found that the "Breakfast Blend" is the most drinkable. Not amazing, but way better than the other choices.

    18. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding. My wife wanted one for Christmas, so she got one (not from me). Thankfully it's a Keurig 1.0. I insisted on finding one of the good re-usable stainless steel filters and I just put regular ground coffee in it. Works great for me. She only cares about the convenience, and won't use the re-usable one. It's sad to me, but it's her choice. Honestly, how people can think throwing out all these plastic k-cups are a great idea is beyond me.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    19. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by mjwx · · Score: 2

      I was not liking that either, but there's a brand at Costco (San Fran I think) that makes fully biodegradable k-kup compatible single serves. The bottoms are just filter, and the top is a corn-plastic ring and some kind of high-strength paper. Works great, dolphins agree!

      Its still incredibly wasteful. All those extra resources just so you can make a crap cup of coffee.

      Once you learn how to make a proper espresso you will look upon pod machines with disdain and disgust. Personally given the choice between pod and instant, I'll take instant. They're both crap but the instant is faster, cheaper, less wasteful and doesn't make me feel like a hipster.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    20. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd like to see the environmental nightmare of the Keurig and Tassimo curl up and die.

      I own a keurig and a half dozen reusable pods that I throw in the dishwasher. I actually waste less coffee, coffee filters, etc.. now that I own a keurig and I like that I can make a single cup of coffee in the morning without any waste. I used the 20 pods that came free with my keurig but I haven't bought any since. I don't understand why people continue to buy those overpriced pieces of plastic when the same exact coffee is a fraction of the cost. Are people really that lazy that they can't spend 3 seconds dumping the old grounds in the trash?

      I have a 2-cup espresso machine. No pods at all. Permanent stainless-steel filter. The only disposable thing that goes into it is ground coffee and it makes 1 or 2 cups in about 2 minutes. And the used grounds go around the plants and make them VERY happy!

    21. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I prefer strong coffee. Impossible to make in a Keurig, "

      Ahh the words of an "expert" that has never used a K cup machine, probably has never even looked at one.

      You are 118% wrong. you can easily make a strong cup of coffee, in fact there are pods for it, if I dont want to use the DIY pod with my grind, I use the REVV pods that are fantastic strong dark blend if I am in a hurry and dont want to assemble a DIY pod.

      If I use my refillable pod, I can make it wonderfully strong, it's really easy, just add more coffee grinds than is needed, it still extracts the same 12oz of water for regular and tastes fantastic with a nice strong cuppa. Except if you want strong you don't just add more grinds, you use the right coffee roast.

      Maybe next time before you go ranting about something, you might want to have actually touched one first.

    22. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Either you have good coffee in earth destroying pods, or you get the compostable pods with the most rancid low grade floor sweepings coffee out there.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    23. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Once you learn how to make a proper espresso you will look upon pod machines with disdain and disgust.

      But there may be as much as sixty seconds of rigamarole involved, how will these coffee achievers get enough caffeine into their systems before they have to run out the door with a poptart in their cheek pouch if they have to do something? Surely the planet can suck it!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This all conspires to mean that every cup of Newman's Own Medium Roast Breakfast Blend tastes just like the one I had earlier today. Or last week. Or last year. Or two years ago, when he had a completely different Keurig machine.

      You are reminding me of Snow Crash. That wasn't a manual.

      the stuff I make at home, though very tasty and much, much cheaper is never as consistent as the boss's Keurig.

      Throw away that stupid drip maker and make espresso. It's both more consistent, and actually worth drinking. Any $5 thrift store espresso machine does a good job once you figure out just how the timing works on steaming the milk and whatnot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by SuseLover · · Score: 1

      Me too!

      I still can't figure out why the damn things got so popular. More expensive per cup, produces alot of unnecessary plastic waste, and limited selection of coffee type/flavors. I'll take my unbleached filters and fresh ground whole beans and have to wait the whole 4 minutes it takes me to drip-brew a pot of coffee anytime over that.

      I swear, people are so f'ing impatient anymore. Just like so many prefer to use the spyware known as Chrome as a browser because it renders a page 1/3rd of a second faster than Firefox.

    26. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best to kick your coffee addiction. The only way to win is to not play.

    27. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      So, your solutions are (1) use a different type of coffee and (2) "use more grinds than is needed", except you don't just add more grinds, you recurse to (1) above.

      (1) Using a different type of coffee is not a solution. Look, I have caffeine pills here as well. Maybe I can just throw in a few caffeine pills with my brew to make it stronger? Or how about a few chunks of charcoal? I can see you as a salesman, telling people they have selected the wrong car, or business suit!

      (2) I WAS adding "more" grounds. I was filling the cup, with my blend of coffee AND using the least water setting. As I said originally. Do you seriously think I would be half-filling a K-Cup, and then be complaining about it being too weak?!

      You have almost no control of the water to coffee ratio in a K-Cup, AND it brews a cup in 20 seconds. If you follow the directions of a French press (my normal method), you let the water sit on the coffee for around 4 to 5 minutes (I choose 5). Do you think just maybe 300 seconds of brew time is going to make a stronger brew than 20 seconds of brew time?

      --
      I come here for the love
    28. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately with the huge selection and reusable pods with filters, they are quite handy.

      Since we're playing the insult game, you are a poo poo head with tastebuds that are wrong.

    29. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      While I agree, the process of making a cup of coffee with a presspot, vacuum pot, Moka pot, or pour-over pot like a Chemex can be quite time-consuming, especially if you have to grind whole roasted coffee beans. The Keurig sold very well (until the Keurig 2.0 fiasco) because the process of getting a decent mug of coffee was very convenient and very fast.

      Keurig has said they are working on a new type of K-cup that uses vegetable-based plastics for easier recycleability or easier breakdown in landfills--they hope to have them in production by 2017 or so.

    30. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by cfalcon · · Score: 0

      I use a French press, but my experience with Keurig on travel and at relative's places has been good. I'm sure throwing away a few plastic cups won't hurt anything at all, and a point about thirty million people isn't going to convince me otherwise, because I'm not thirty fucking million people.

      It's super convenient and fast and makes cute little robot wookie noises. But, I mean, it's more expensive than a French press, each cup is more expensive than a French press, not as great coffee as a French press, and I don't get to swirl the coffee with a butter knife while staring down the road from my window. Each thing has its ups and downs... but if you are trying to add "saving the environment", that's just delusional.

    31. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Hipsters pour over, French press, or have a great coffee shop just a couple blocks north. Yuppies or whatever use the Keurig. Or at an office, those things are amazing there when you don't have the ability to go wash and deal with beans and crap.

    32. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Why do you want the "Keurig ship to sink"? If you need better coffee than it makes, well, you already can do that. My aunt and uncle have a Keurig, and boy does it kick ass for them. A bunch of people over? No problem with the Keurig. Everyone self serves without you having to be a bad hostess. Put the thing on, tease the dog while it works.

      Keurig isn't for YOU. You were not really the market, and maybe someone will come up with a version that actually makes excellent coffee, them or a competitor. But who cares if you don't like it enough to not use it, or if I don't like it enough to buy it? I bet there's a lot of consumer products you don't want or use, do their ships need to sink too?

    33. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      They require more cleaning than I am willing to do and for those 5 cups of coffee a week I drink at home they are quite expensive.
      Dunno about Keurig but Nespresso is easy and cheap for my use case.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    34. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One. percent. of. land. fill. waste.

    35. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have tried the French press. It' requires more work and attention, and is mess to clean up, using a lot more water in the process.

    36. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Get an Aeropress. It's like a giant syringe with a filter on the end, and squeegees itself clean as you make the coffee. You throw away the grounds and a small piece of filter paper, then rinse the end lightly and you're done. I bring one and a hand grinder when I travel for work and use the hotel coffeemaker to heat the water.

    37. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by epine · · Score: 1

      I actually waste less coffee, coffee filters, etc.. now that I own a keurig and I like that I can make a single cup of coffee in the morning without any waste.

      I had the same feeling when I switched to single cup pour-over, without the blasted machine or the blasted machine politics.

      Somehow, I always manage to find three minutes of work to be done in the kitchen while I pace three or four slugs of hot water. Must be some weird corollary to Murphy's law. Or maybe my cookware is telepathic.

    38. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by neurovish · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people continue to buy those overpriced pieces of plastic

      For the same reason you see these same people with 2 x crates of over priced bottled water in their cart.
      I don't understand it either.

      Their municipal water supply is flouridated and they want to keep the commies out of their precious bodily fluids?

    39. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      San Francisco has a Costco?!?!
      Good Lord, how bourgeois...

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    40. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about San Fransico Bay's Breakfast Blend? This is currently the highest rated and most reviewed k-cup on Amazon. At 80/$27.55 on Amazon, it's also (by far) the cheapest. It's the only thing on Amazon I subscribe to, and I highly recommend it.

    41. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      you have good coffee in earth destroying pods

      this actually sounds like an intriguing scifi. the meteor pods from space destroy earth, but in the meantime, here have some alien brew!

    42. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      that thing is $15-20 so I'm no surprised people haven't bought 6 of them.

    43. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      that thing is $15-20 so I'm no surprised people haven't bought 6 of them.

      The one sold by keurig is expensive and doesn't work right. The offbrand ones work much better and work with any machine. I bought a pack of 4 for $10. So they cost me $2.50 each which is slightly more than the price of a single k-cup. Here is a current listing on ebay for 4 for $8.50: http://www.ebay.com/itm/4pk-So... which is even less than what I paid. You can get them even cheaper on ebay if you are willing to wait on shipping from china.

    44. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      People have different tastes. I enjoy espresso occasionally, but the gritty particulate is something I have to be in the mood for. My normal cup is heavily filtered, I prefer the clean taste of nice thick Chemex filters. To me, the best tasting coffee is made from water boiled in glass, poured through a thick filter into glass, and drank from ceramic. I'd love to have a vacuum extractor to speed the process, but something can be said for making a time consuming ritual of something so enjoyable.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    45. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      oh good idea, that works

    46. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Burn the Mormon!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    47. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Burnt coffee is not the same as strong coffee.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    48. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I enjoy espresso occasionally, but the gritty particulate is something I have to be in the mood for.

      What you need is a burr grinder worth a crap. Then you don't have gritty particulate, again, even out of the cheapest espresso machines — the only kind I've ever owned.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:I'd like to see the environmental nightmare die by zlives · · Score: 1

      Nespressi is not too bad however when it comes to taste i prefer my super automatic, also we have 3 coffee drinkers at home and ROI was 7 months compared to starbucks

  9. DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly does the D stand for in this case... decaf?

    1. Re:DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "drip", it's what the cofee does on the way to the mug.

  10. Rating: Sell by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2
    From the article;

    It is also working to launch the Keurig KOLD system in the fall, which it hopes will revolutionize how people consume cold beverages at home.

    Boldly going where many others have failed before. At least with coffee, there was always a need & market for easy 1 cup brewing. I can't see what need they may be filling with cold beverages, and I don't see people adding another appliance unless it is something quite "revolutionary." Am I missing an obvious need?

    For a company that has a limited product line, launching a new one and failing can be very painful.

    1. Re:Rating: Sell by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Maybe it makes iced tea by brewing it hot, then chilling it rapidly.

  11. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Make your product better than your imitators! That's all you need to do. Why does everyone buy SD, PNY, Adata, and Silicon Power flash drives over those much cheaper no-name brand Hong Kong wonders on ebay? Because they lie about the speeds, they fail in about a week, and they're made with flimsy materials. Why do people go to Starbucks instead of Kwik Trip (or Seven Eleven for you southerners) for their coffee? Because Starbucks' product is better. That or because they're hippie douchebags. Either way, if you make your product better, your competitors get no business.

    1. Re:I have an idea by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Starbucks is good coffee? I've not had a good cup of coffee from them in years. They used to be good, but things kept getting worse and worse as they automated all the "process" stuff away and went nuts on portion control. (i.e. it became about money and not good coffee).

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's definitely not great but it is consistent

    3. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, better product. What a waste of budget.

      Far better to spend some marketing dollars to trick customers to dip a toe in the water then lock those fuckers down for lifetime subscriptions!

    4. Re:I have an idea by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      So is every brand of junk food.

      Starbucks is proof that great advertising can sell mediocre product to the masses. It's not that Starbucks is bad. It's just not all it's hyped up to be. Thing is, it doesn't have to be. When you make coffee flavored chocolate milk like most of the people buy, the coffee takes a back seat and you can get away with mediocre flavor.

    5. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking a cup of Starbucks coffee is like eating a McDonalds hamburger: it's no damn good, but at least one knows that it'll be exactly the same next time.

    6. Re:I have an idea by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Starbucks basically collapsed in Australia because it couldn't make a decent coffee to save itself (sorry).

    7. Re:I have an idea by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

      Or they could try 2-year contracts. That's an established way to keep customers without actually trying to make them want to stay.

    8. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could try 2-year contracts. That's an established way to keep customers without actually trying to make them want to stay.

      I know you say this in jest, but they did that. It was called Keurig Choice.

      http://blog.keurig.com/blog/amy-2/introducing-keurig-choice

    9. Re:I have an idea by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      Much the same here in the Shaky Isles. A few SBs around but out-numbered greatly by coffee shops that actually sell you nice coffee.
      According to their website 26 stores in NZ (pop 4.5m) with about 1/2 of them in Auckland (pop 1.3m).

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    10. Re:I have an idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Make your product better than your imitators! That's all you need to do. Why does everyone buy SD, PNY, Adata, and Silicon Power flash drives over those much cheaper no-name brand Hong Kong wonders on ebay?

      I don't know. PNY is effectively a no-name brand HK wonder. Not only is their hardware garbage, but their return policies are crap. Like Kingston, you have to provide proof-of-purchase on RMA replacement of an SD card with a lifetime warranty. Seriously? I have to file a receipt for every little memory card I buy? Or I could just buy sandisk and not buy PNY or Kingston, let alone some crap brand.

      PNY is shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:I have an idea by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      In Aus Starbucks openned 85 stores. Lost $144 million dollars and then closed 60 of their stores....

    12. Re:I have an idea by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      I get Starbucks coffee a few times a week- any time I don't make my own, and sometimes in the afternoon even if I do.

      I definitely like their coffee. It's not as good as you can make yourself, but that's a high standard. Certainly, they are the best coffee anywhere between my work and my home, and that distance is non trivial. There's a couple shops downtown that blow it away, but those are not on my commute, nor, for that matter, anywhere convenient unless you are next to them already (which is still plenty of people- but it doesn't help me on a normal day).

    13. Re:I have an idea by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Because Starbucks' product is better. That or because they're hippie douchebags. .

      starbucks? hippie douchebags? I think meant to say highschool and college white girls

      I can't even.

    14. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starbucks is good coffee?

      In the context that the poster was referencing it (Starbucks has coffee that is superior to gas station fare)? Absolutely.

    15. Re:I have an idea by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      The real product that Starbucks sells is its dining room - a place where, for $3-$10, you can sit for an hour in a relatively comfortable chair and either meet with someone, get some work done, or simply not-sit-at-home. Now, that's certainly not to say that there aren't a large number of people who like the "coffee flavored chocolate milk", but there's any number of places that sell actual-coffee that see plenty of business. I'm a 7-Eleven guy myself, but Dunkin' Donuts is also very popular. Many of the gas stations around me sell either Green Mountain or Chock Full O' Nuts, so it's entirely possible to purchase drinkable coffee along with gasoline. The law of large numbers says that there's going to be a good number of people who will just prefer Starbucks' product to the competition.

    16. Re:I have an idea by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

      A good number of people watched Honey Boo Boo too.

  12. Nothing of value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Green Mountain (Keurig) stock dropped by 10% this morning

    And nothing of value was lost.

  13. Another Republican scam crashes and burns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hate us and want us to die. That is why they did this.

  14. I almost bought a 2.0 DRMed... by Ducho_CWB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While looking for a coffee machine, I liked one of this 2.0 Keurig models.
    Then I learned about this "only keurig aproved" cups and actually bought an 1.0 keurig machine instead.
    And using this 1.0 model I can't see a reason for one buy a 2.0 model.

    1. Re:I almost bought a 2.0 DRMed... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      It's kind of nice being able to make a pot of coffee. If you have a dinner party and want to make coffee for everybody afterwards, somebody has to stand around the Keurig machine pressing buttons for ten minutes, handing out cups of coffee one-by-one.

      While conceptually I don't like the idea of DRM'd coffee, realistically anything you buy is licensed, and using "my KCup" brews coffee that's so ridiculously weak. By the time you're grinding your own beans, just use a gold-filter pour-over.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:I almost bought a 2.0 DRMed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While looking for a coffee machine, I liked one of this 2.0 Keurig models.
      Then I learned about this "only keurig aproved" cups and actually bought an 1.0 keurig machine instead.
      And using this 1.0 model I can't see a reason for one buy a 2.0 model.

      So in the end they still got your money.

    3. Re:I almost bought a 2.0 DRMed... by Ducho_CWB · · Score: 1

      So in the end they still got your money.

      My wife was going to buy a keurig machine anyway...
      At least I could persuade her to buy the old model.

    4. Re:I almost bought a 2.0 DRMed... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      Or you could just have a regular coffee maker for such occurrences and a Keurig for day-to-day. My little drip coffee maker normally sits under the cabinet unless I need to make a pot (rare). It cost like $20.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:I almost bought a 2.0 DRMed... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      In social situations, pot is "host makes it", and Keurig is "press your own button", probably because of the labor and cup selection. I've never seen someone standing around a Keurig. ur doin it rong!

    6. Re:I almost bought a 2.0 DRMed... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      If you have a dinner party and want to make coffee for everybody, please don't put pod after pod into the keurig. It is very wasteful and takes a long time.

      Instead, drive to the local store, buy some bulk coffee and a drip coffeemaker, drive home and make a pot or two. Then throw the coffeemaker and leftover coffee into the garbage. It is faster, cheaper, and less wasteful than those damn pods. Plus, it will taste better unless you buy farmer bros.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  15. Unlicensed meets 3rd party. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Flexbrew (unofficial K-Cup coffee machine) and I have trouble getting it to work with my OneCup (3rd party K-Cup) variety pack. Funny, that.

    At least you get a "freedom clip" from the OneCup company.

  16. "Quite honestly, we were wrong." by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > "Quite honestly, we were wrong."

    YA THINK??? Sorry sorry sorry. That's a little unfair, now that they're trying to do something more reasonable. Too bad it took a shot to the pocketbook, though.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:"Quite honestly, we were wrong." by bobbied · · Score: 2

      > "Quite honestly, we were wrong."

      YA THINK??? Sorry sorry sorry. That's a little unfair, now that they're trying to do something more reasonable. Too bad it took a shot to the pocketbook, though.

      They are sorry to be caught... If they really cared, they'd provide a DRM "fix" kit for anybody who owns a 2.0 device.... Betcha they don't do that..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  17. The other way round by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    The French Press is to prepare his skin for the straight razor - by compressing shaving foam directly into his pores, hair literally leaps from follicles into the path of the blade.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The other way round by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      This is actually one of the best posts I've ever read on slashdot. Well done sir.

    2. Re:The other way round by SuperBeaker · · Score: 1

      Best comment ever.

    3. Re:The other way round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is a cunt, he's in luck. That method is a good alternative to a Brazilian wax.

  18. Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company says they now plan to go out of business

  19. Bialetti Moka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Bialetti Moka is DRM free, makes much tastier coffee than the makers of these machines would ever imagine, costs significantly less, and it environmental friendly.

  20. Thank you consumers! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 2

    At last, a serious blow to the pocket book for companies employing stupid DRM crap.

    Consumers voted with their wallets and Keurig learns a valuable lesson. Let's hope other industries learn from their mistake and consumer continue to take a stance against this garbage.

  21. Didn't matter to me. by kuzb · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hacking the Keurig is as easy as Hollywood style bomb defusing. You open it and literally cut the green wire. It takes less than 5 minutes and removes all restrictions.

    Video explanation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  22. They could have, if they were not stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They could have gotten away with it if they had been smarter about it.

    K-cup is popular.

    The 2.0 machine will do things like espresso, and it needs the smarts to do it,

    If they had set the machine to treat K-cups without the chips just like the old machine did, no one would have cared.

    As more of the featurefull drinks became more popular, more drinks would move over to that.

    10 years out, when people are drinking a LOT more of the drinks that use the new features, your making a LOT more money.

    Oh, wait, that doesn't drive everyone else out of the market. But it sells a lot more machines and a lot more licences to make drinks using the new features.

    1. Re:They could have, if they were not stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was another brand that put bar codes on their pods which contained the brewing instructions for the machines. If Keurig had gotten behind that, it would probably be killing the market right now instead of trying to recover from a slow-down.

  23. Too late by Kobun · · Score: 1

    Too late, too bad. Our Keurig bit the dust shortly after the DRM pods hit the shelves. We didn't replace it. We won't replace it. One more drop in the lost customers bucket for Keurig, but enough of them add up to a flood.

    1. Re:Too late by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Why is that? If DRM was the concern, then they are backtracking that (or there were ways around it). The cost maybe? What exactly are you trying to protest here?

    2. Re: Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't backtracking, they are trying to sidestep the issue by licensing the cups more widely.

  24. I wonder how Green Mountain and Coke are feeling w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how Green Mountain and Coke are feeling with the amount of money they have both invested in this line. Kinda sick to go the route of DRM. I bet there are some very unhappy folks in those Green Mountains as well as down in Atlanta today.

  25. In the meantime by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My 20 year old Saeco Vienna superautomatic just grinds, tamps, brews and foams with barely a microcontroller in there and physical buttons. No LCD, no IoT, no touch screen, no flavors, no DRM.

    Until they can DRM individual coffee beans, I'm never changing.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:In the meantime by Tokolosh · · Score: 2

      It's called "Fair Trade".

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    2. Re:In the meantime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL @ a crappy espresso machine that costs too much.

    3. Re:In the meantime by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2

      What's crappy about it? The dated looks?

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    4. Re:In the meantime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poor quality of the espresso.

    5. Re:In the meantime by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you clean it, descale it, keep the gaskets lubed and grinder sharp, it's OK.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    6. Re:In the meantime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until they can DRM individual coffee beans, I'm never changing.

      Monsanto To The Rescue!

  26. The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am not even opposed to DRM per se. DRM as a means of piracy prevention is fair (although it's rarely implemented in a good way). DRM as a means of vendor lock in is completely unacceptable. If Keurig somehow remains successful, it reinforces the precedent that dabbling with vendor lock in is ok, as long as you apologize when it becomes a PR problem. What would be better is if a huge company goes bankrupt over it, and scares other companies from trying the same thing.

    1. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      DRM as a means of piracy prevention is fair (although it's rarely implemented in a good way).

      No, it's never implemented in a good way, because there is no "good way". There is no DRM which is both effective and not a PITA for paying customers at least in some situations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      DRM implemented for piracy prevention is not fair it's not even functional. Media DRM is just as much of a lock in you can only use it on things the allow you to use it on.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Philosopher's Syndrome: "mistaking a lack of imagination for an insight into necessity".

      The fact that you can't think of a good way to implement DRM, doesn't mean that a good way doesn't/can't exist.

    4. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      You don't think it's fair to stop piracy?

    5. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Give that some more thought. DRM is unfair, period. Big Media has been running a massive propaganda campaign to convince everyone that piracy is immoral, and no different than stealing. It sounds like they still have you halfway convinced. Neither of those claims is correct. If they stuck to just trying to prevent copying, that would bolster their position, but they don't. They've shown that they cannot be trusted. They get greedy, and do unethical things like unskippable commercials on Blu-Ray, and region encoding on DVD. There have even been a few infamous incidents where they callously put their good customers at risk on the thinking that protecting their intellectual property justified any intrusive and damaging measure, stuff like the Sony rootkit and Turbo Tax boot sector rewrite. Then there's the entire shakedown and terror campaign where they threaten to sue ordinary citizens into oblivion for not even copying, but only "making available" material that might or might not even be copyrighted. Even if guilty, a punishment of $222,000 or $1.92 million for "making available" 24 songs, is completely over the top. As many people have noted, the punishment for an actual theft, a shoplifting of one CD, which can easily hold those 24 songs, is comparatively light, maybe a few hundred dollars.

      Copyright is only a means to promote art and science. It is neither a good way to do it, nor the only way. Big Media propagandists would have us all believe that artists will starve without copyright. That is simply not true. We have crowdfunding now. We ought to expand that, and abolish copyright.

      Think about what copyright blocks. Our public libraries should be much more digital. It would save us huge amounts of money. No more having to travel to the library to pick up a physical copy, and then having to make a second trip to return the copy. No more unavailable items because all copies are currently checked out. You'd just download a copy, and delete it when you didn't want it any more. Libraries could have far, far more content, including current stuff which libraries are notoriously poor at stocking, losses from damaged media would be almost nothing, and most of all, it would be so much more searchable. The only reason the private bookstore succeeded is that they occupied a niche, current fiction and non-fiction, that the public library wasn't nimble enough to fill.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    6. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that you can't think of a good way to implement DRM, doesn't mean that a good way doesn't/can't exist.

      No, it's the fact that no one can think of a good way to implement DRM. At least, it hasn't happened yet, and a lot of human effort has been spent on it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by Richard+Elmore · · Score: 1

      It never ceases to amaze me how unforgiving people can be. It might make you feel good to say Keurig should die but there are hundreds (thousands?) of people working at Keurig that had nothing to do with this decision and it seems kind of heartless to say they should all lose their jobs because a few executives made a bad decision later changed their mind.

      I know a guy who worked at Arthur Andersen at the time they went out of business. The part of the company where he worked had no connection to Enron but they all lost their jobs in the fallout. He indicated one time that the part of the company that was involved with the Enron was something like 70 people out of 85,000. That's pretty harsh justice but at least in case of Arthur Anderson you can show that a lot of people were hurt when Enron went bankrupt so there is some justice in it.

      In the case of Keurig nobody has lost their job or their retirement savings because of this, it's just a cup of coffee.

    8. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      I've got no issue with stopping piracy, but DRM does not do that, it restricts usage by people that actually bought it. It removed peoples right to access things when DRM servers go away etc etc.

      Watermarking stops piracy it's not even that expensive to do with digital downloads. It does not have any restrictions associated with it. Sure people will steal a CC and try and make their IP untraceable via TOR, VPN etc etc. That is still a higher bar than DRM provides to piracy today.

      Worse yet DRM makes anything that accesses it no longer really yours. Your required to give access to media cartels who have shown they can not be trusted (Sony looking at ya) and run their binary blobs with unrestricted access. My first HDTV 1080 Tube beautiful breathtaking picture and clarity, DRM says no HDCP can not play on this few year old device (at the time) with a 20+ year life expectancy. Oddly I did not accept that, so I rip the BD so long DRM and happily stream to every screen in my house transcoding as necessary.

      DRM goes hand in hand with region coding, why can I not buy a legal BD from Russia or wherever and play it? It's perfectly legal for me to buy and bring back into the US.

      DRM is not about stopping piracy it's about media cartels continuous search for rent seeking trying to get us to rebuy their media. To pay for DRM equipment to be added to our devices that is under their control. That famous you can not skip these commercials for upcoming disney stuff this stops piracy how (outside that oh so useful do not copy this FBI warning (even though it's perfectly legal to do just that for personal use))

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    9. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      It never ceases to amaze me how unforgiving people can be. It might make you feel good to say Keurig should die but there are hundreds (thousands?) of people working at Keurig that had nothing to do with this decision and it seems kind of heartless to say they should all lose their jobs because a few executives made a bad decision later changed their mind.

      So you think it's better for those thousands of people to continue working at a badly managed, boring company instead of working for some better managed new company?

      In the case of Keurig nobody has lost their job or their retirement savings because of this, it's just a cup of coffee.

      Why would the company going out of business result in anybody losing their retirement savings?

    10. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by Richard+Elmore · · Score: 1

      It never ceases to amaze me how unforgiving people can be. It might make you feel good to say Keurig should die but there are hundreds (thousands?) of people working at Keurig that had nothing to do with this decision and it seems kind of heartless to say they should all lose their jobs because a few executives made a bad decision later changed their mind.

      So you think it's better for those thousands of people to continue working at a badly managed, boring company instead of working for some better managed new company?

      Why do you believe Keurig is badly managed? They made a mistake and now seem to have realized their mistake (time will tell). Every company I've ever worked for (including the one that I owned) made mistakes and, in most cases, I think they learned from then and became better companies.

      Also, why do you think the next company they work for will be managed better? If we hope to see a company die each time they make a mistake then the only companies left will be the ones that are still working on their first big mistake.

      In the case of Keurig nobody has lost their job or their retirement savings because of this, it's just a cup of coffee.

      Why would the company going out of business result in anybody losing their retirement savings?

      The point was, there was some justice in the failure of Arthur Andersen because their actions with Enron resulted in a lot of people losing a lot of money when Enron collapsed. That is not the case here, Keurig's DRM scheme may have driven up the price of a cup of coffee but nobody lost anything substantial as a result.

    11. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I've got no issue with stopping piracy, but DRM does not do that, it restricts usage by people that actually bought it. It removed peoples right to access things when DRM servers go away etc etc.

      I don't dispute that most implementations of DRM are not consumer friendly. This does not mean that DRM must necessarily be implemented in a way that embodies all the negative effects normally associated with it.

      Maybe someone will figure out a game changing DRM scheme that effectively stops piracy without the negative side effects.

      My point was not that DRM as it exists today is good. My point was that that goal of stopping piracy is not an unfair goal to attempt to achieve. As opposed to vendor lock in (where even the goal unhindered by side effects) , was unacceptable.

    12. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      It never ceases to amaze me how unforgiving people can be. It might make you feel good to say Keurig should die but there are hundreds (thousands?) of people working at Keurig that had nothing to do with this decision and it seems kind of heartless to say they should all lose their jobs because a few executives made a bad decision later changed their mind.

      I realize many people might lose their jobs (at a poorly managed company). My hope would be that these people would get new jobs at other companies (possibly even at the company that buys Keurig).

      Enron was an utterly corrupt company. The harm done by this company far exceeded any of the benefits of the jobs they provided. People can get new jobs at companies that are not stealing money from society. I'm not even saying Keurig is anywhere as close to as bad as Enron.

      Furthermore, if you read my post you'll see that the reason I want Keurig to die is to prevent other companies from following the same path (and hence preventing further jobs from being "lost" or what I would rather call "changed").

      In the case of Keurig nobody has lost their job or their retirement savings because of this, it's just a cup of coffee.

      It is not the case that retirements are necessarily lost when companies die. It might be the case for employees whose retirement savings is entirely in the form of Keurig stock (which would be really dumb).

    13. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Think of all the great innovations that have happened. Before those innovations, no one had thought of a good way to realize that particular innovation. Look at something like the field of cryptography. There millennia of failed (i.e. insecure) encryption schemes before truly good encryption was innovated. The fact that a lot of human effort had been spent on unsuccessful cryptography in the past was not an indication that good cryptography was impossible.

      There are really hard problems being solved every day. It's foolish to think that past failures imply indefinite future failures.

    14. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Give that some more thought. DRM is unfair, period. Big Media has been running a massive propaganda campaign to convince everyone that piracy is immoral, and no different than stealing. It sounds like they still have you halfway convinced.

      So DRM as implemented by Big Media today is unfair, therefore all future DRM implementations by anyone for any purpose are also unfair?

      This is like saying GMO is evil because Monsanto is evil.

    15. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

      If we hope to see a company die each time they make a mistake then the only companies left will be the ones that are still working on their first big mistake.

      I don't "hope" anything. I'm pointing out that your entire chain of reasoning is bogus, because it is premised on the idea that somehow it's a bad thing when people lose a job. If the company goes out of business, then it's because somehow it wasn't needed anymore, and the employees are then better off working somewhere else.

      That is not the case here, Keurig's DRM scheme may have driven up the price of a cup of coffee but nobody lost anything substantial as a result.

      So what? If Keurig ties up labor and resources making shitty products, that in itself constitutes substantial harm to society and to its employees.

      You reason as if labor were abundant and that jobs are this delicate arrangement that needs to be protected. In fact, labor is scarce and precious, and any labor that gets tied up in useless pursuits is a drain on society.

      The reason why you think that way is pretty clear: losing a job is scary at an individual level and in the short term. And we are creating more and more obstacles to labor mobility. Those trends are what we need to reverse.

    16. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM is by definition anti-customer. That's the problem in a truly "free market" right there. Technology cannot solve what is a fundamental social rights issue.

    17. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      As I said watermarking can achieve those goals without any of the downsides of DRM.

      DRM requires that there be some part of your device that you do not control. In general it requires a whole chain of things, binary blobs etc etc that you do not control. It will never stop piracy if you can decode the stream and display it on a monitor you can pirate it. HDCP and the like is built on the premise that nobody could afford to save the raw stream, 10-15 years ago that was very expensive now it's no longer the case. Remember that all this DRM gear adds to the cost to consumers, a massive cost in actuality. Why do we need to subsidize and industry with laws that make our things no longer our own and pay for the right to do so? Lets look at audio, sales went up 10% once DRM was removed, do you still think media's requirement for DRM is about stopping piracy vs having control?

      It's fair that media industry can try and stop piracy, they should not get special laws to do so, they should not be allowed to effectively have low level access to every bit of hardware to do so. Frankly the best thing the government could do is ditch the protective laws and start heavily taxing all DRM'ed goods and require that the master keys for said DRM be held in escrow by the library of congress or similar with a provision if they fail to continue to manage said DRM they will release the keys and the applicable work goes into public domain. Were at a point where if we do not do something effective DRM means we will loose a massive ammount of our shared culture in the long run. Not a price I'm willing to pay to potentially increase the profitability of fairly small group of corps.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    18. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      it can not be "solved"

      it's not a matter of ingenuity

      if the process allows offerring the product to the rightful consumer then it can be copied.

      can't get around the idea that you can set one bit the same as another bit, which is the basis of everything digital.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    19. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't fair to "stop piracy". It's fair to have laws against copyright infringement, but it is NOT fair to "stop piracy".

      Because we both know that means *through technical means, subverting the desired processing of a processor owned by a third party". Doesn't matter how many bullshit EULAs you click, the guy who owns the machine controls the processing.

      DRM is fundamentally theft. Anyone implementing it is trying to own a machine they didn't pay for.

    20. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2

      No, I am saying DRM is unfair, period. It's not just the implementation, or the excesses. It is the goal. They are trying to make ideas and thinking no different than material property. They want people to have to buy and sell ideas as if they were no different than material goods such as clothes. They have resorted to propaganda, equating copying to stealing at every opportunity, calling people who do it by the loaded term "pirates" no matter how innocent the copying, calling ideas "property" with the terminology "intellectual properties", and even referring to all of us as "consumers", as if listening to a song is no different than eating a slice of bread. Further, they are trying to pull that one on the public only where it suits them. These are the guys who brought us the really unethical and cheating practices of Hollywood Accounting. They conveniently exempt themselves from the rules they say everyone else should follow.

      Equating material and immaterial things, to try to turn our entire society into an ownership game at which they can easily win because they're so good at it, is a terrible vision. Civilization itself depends upon the sharing of ideas. We did not rise to the top of the animal kingdom because we are stronger or faster than all other animals. We obviously aren't. Of animals about our size, we are the slowest and weakest by far. We made it to the top because we work together to invent and build things other animal cannot. Now these tyrants of the mind want to control all commerce of thought. If they had their way, no one would be able to communicate anything at all without paying them a big toll. Through bribery and corruption of our public officials, they have had far too much success at lengthening copyright beyond all sense, despite the vast majority, of perhaps over 90%, in favor of scaling copyright back. They've expanded the scope of copyrights and patents to cover things they were never meant to cover originally. Should software be patentable? They've actually had the hubris to patent genes, and laws of nature, copyright mere lists of data and facts. They are allowed to try to fool people with EULAs and contractual terms that are in fact not enforceable, though they claim they are of course. When they whistle, our police forces, who we pay for and who serve us, come running to do their bidding. They've tried to make us pay to police every network packet, to check whether it contains copyrighted material. They would shut down and abolish the Internet, the used book store, the public library, the university, and the grade school. Our children would not be allowed to learn a thing without having to pay and pay again for the privilege, because knowledge is valuable.

      Fortunately for all of us, imposition and enforcement of their vision is impractical. The universe does not work in accordance with their desires.

      But the first step is to take that aura of respectability off these Big Media bandits. They are not fine upstanding business people, they commit worse thievery than anything they accuse us of. Bank reputations are much tarnished for their role in causing the Great Recession through blatant dishonesty, cheating, and fraud. Why do people like you accord the practitioners of Hollywood Accounting respect, and listen to their propaganda as if it was genuinely meant? Over and over, they have exposed themselves as bullies, cowards, liars, manipulators, and thieves. But they're rich, and that's all that matters to far too many people. Many of us realize that the mental shortcut of measuring the worth of a person by the worth of their material possessions is wrong, but we do it anyway.

      What is the point of driving a single mother into bankruptcy and taking her home away, over a measly 24 songs? Her children certainly did nothing to deserve being kicked out of their home. They are notorious for picking people they think they can beat up, to make an example of, to terrorize the rest of us. A number of young people have been forced to give up their dreams of getting a college education, because these scumbags decided that making that financially impossible was suitable punishment for sharing a few songs. And those are the people you think still deserve a hearing?

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    21. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      DRM requires that there be some part of your device that you do not control.

      Not necessarily. This is how current DRM schemes usually work. Also, having a device that you do not have complete control over is not necessarily a bad thing. Look at things like TPM, that work on this premise.

      Remember that all this DRM gear adds to the cost to consumers, a massive cost in actuality.

      On average. It may actually one day lower the cost to paying consumers by forcing pirates to pay for content as well.

      Lets look at audio, sales went up 10% once DRM was removed, do you still think media's requirement for DRM is about stopping piracy vs having control?

      I am not talking about specific existing DRM schemes. I am talking about the possibility of DRM working better in the future.

      It's fair that media industry can try and stop piracy, they should not get special laws to do so, they should not be allowed to effectively have low level access to every bit of hardware to do so.

      I agree that they should not get special laws. I feel like good DRM (i.e a technical solution) could be potentially much better than a legal "solution".

      Frankly the best thing the government could do is ditch the protective laws and start heavily taxing all DRM'ed goods and require that the master keys for said DRM be held in escrow by the library of congress or similar with a provision if they fail to continue to manage said DRM they will release the keys and the applicable work goes into public domain.

      And this is a good example of a possible DRM solution.

      Were at a point where if we do not do something effective DRM means we will loose a massive ammount of our shared culture in the long run. Not a price I'm willing to pay to potentially increase the profitability of fairly small group of corps.

      I think it is very important to prevent bad DRM solutions (of the kind that most are today) from flourishing. I just don't think that it is impossible to have good DRM.

    22. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      You seem to be making a lot of assumptions there.

    23. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      No, I am saying DRM is unfair, period. It's not just the implementation, or the excesses. It is the goal. They are trying to make ideas and thinking no different than material property. They want people to have to buy and sell ideas as if they were no different than material goods such as clothes.

      If you are morally opposed to the whole concept of intellectual property, that's fine. That's a value judgement. I am not interested in criticizing value judgements. I am sympathetic to the view that the idea of intellectual property can stifle innovation along with other negative consequences. However, I think if done correctly the concept of intellectual property may foster innovation.

      What is the point of driving a single mother into bankruptcy and taking her home away, over a measly 24 songs? Her children certainly did nothing to deserve being kicked out of their home.

      You are referring to a legal "solution" to enforcing the concept of intellectual property. DRM is a technical solution to this problem. Imagine if there were no laws but only DRM to try to stop people form piracy. Maybe she is not technically savvy enough to bypass the DRM. Oh well she doesn't get the 24 songs, or is forced to pay for them. Or maybe her kids are good with computers and are able to download some tools to break the DRM, then she does get the 24 songs and the media company loses a few bucks. Either way no one is going to jail. It is only the legal punishments which have the potential to destroy people's lives.

      I do agree that equating physical and intellectual property is silly. They have different properties which make the consequences of "theft" different. But just out of curiosity, what would you say to someone who believes it is immoral to own physical property? I am also sympathetic to the view that no one should be able to "own" things like property and natural resources.

    24. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are really hard problems being solved every day. It's foolish to think that past failures imply indefinite future failures.

      Over a billion dollars a year is spent on DRM, all of it ineffective at its stated goal. Mind you that mark was crossed around 2007, 2008. They're trying to solve a problem which cannot be solved. You simply cannot keep unauthorized parties from viewing content without getting in the way of authorized parties viewing the same content. There's probably a law of information propagation which describes this phenomenon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      TPM is very different it protects my keys for me, potentially even against physical attacks

      Be have a far different opinion of how things are priced, media tends to charge what the market will stand, and used region coding (in many ways part of DRM) to artificially segment those markets. So I doubt that the consumer will see any savings. If anything I think prices will go up as piracy gets harder and less user friendly. In any event I'm talking about the hardware were all paying a hidden amount to support current DRM and implement future DRM.

      DRM can not work "better", if I can watch something I can copy it the question is how much loss. Remember that the further up the stack the more places you need to have DRM.

      I'm more in they should get one or the other, the FBI etc should go after large commercial pirates, the ones feeding the guys on the street selling DVD etc. We should not be going after people making backups or transcoding, things that were legal since the timeshifting case of the early 80's.

      This is not an example of a DRM scheme, requiring the the LOC hold in escrow all DRM keys would require a new law. This is about being able to recover our digital heritage generations from now and has really nothing to do with the DRM itself. Merely picking a responsible party who is already tasked with cataloging and maintaining copies of these sorts of things.

      Could their be good useful DRM sure, I doubt anybody major will ever implement it. Their are means today that can cost effectively curb piracy the corps involved choose not to use them.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    26. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      You ask if I think it is immoral to own physical property. Of course not! With some exceptions. For instance, it is immoral to own slaves, not because ownership is immoral, but because slavery is immoral. Also, owners have responsibilities. For example, owning a car does not give a person the right to dump used engine oil into storm sewers, or drive anywhere they want, tearing up vegetation on public lands. Landowners cannot divert all the water from streams and rivers that happen to cross their properties.

      I've been saying that because the material and immaterial are very different, they should be handled differently, with different legal frameworks. Big Media has been trying to twist our laws and public perceptions. They use a seductive simplification that "property is property" which is completely wrong.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    27. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by plover · · Score: 1

      Arthur Anderson was primarily an accounting and auditing firm. The entire reason that firm existed was to be trustworthy. If people can't trust the auditors, they blame it on instructions coming down from the top that said "anything for a buck comes before an accurate audit." So there was no way to trust the rest of the firm wasn't uninfected with the same corruption that led to Enron.

      At Green Mountain, the decision to put DRM into coffee came from the top. While it doesn't translate the same way to the line workers, the trust in the company was similarly lost by their clients.

      And yes, people might lose their retirement savings. Employees often have a lot invested in company stock. And if Green Mountain has a pension plan, those employees are at risk as well.

      What would be ironic is if Green Mountain collapsed, but other players in the marketplace continued to thrive while using the K-cup (1.0, of course) as a de facto standard.

      --
      John
    28. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Things that are not true:
      1. If you can;t accomplish a task with "billions of dollars", it is impossible
      2. Zero progress has been made in the field of DRM.

      You simply cannot keep unauthorized parties from viewing content without getting in the way of authorized parties viewing the same content. There's probably a law of information propagation which describes this phenomenon.

      "getting in the way" is rather vague, so I don;t think it can be a law of anything without being formalized. Furthermore, I don't think DRM needs to be 100% unobtrusive to be effective.

      Encryption is not 100% unobtrusive to the people using it. It is still quite effective.

    29. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that nobody has brought up a DRM platform that millions of people use daily and seem to enjoy it - Steam. All it is is one giant DRM platform, yet its (normally) unobtrusive, easy to use, and has great deals.

    30. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      If it's immoral to "own" information. Why is it moral to own atoms? They existed well before human beings. Why is it moral to own land? Is the fact that your ancestors and their ancestors claimed ownership of the land a long time ago? Is conquering people and taking their land a good claim on ownership? Why is it moral to own natural resources? Because the resources happen to be within the artificial borders of the thing you called a country?

      I am not saying that physical property and intellectual property are not different. They are.

      I am saying that the moral question of whether it is moral or immoral to own either is subjective.

    31. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      TPM is very different it protects my keys for me, potentially even against physical attacks

      I'm not saying TPM isn't different. I'm saying it's an example of a technology that works because of the fact that you don't have complete control over your machine. (i.e. you don't need full control over your machine for that machine to be useful).

      Be have a far different opinion of how things are priced, media tends to charge what the market will stand, and used region coding (in many ways part of DRM) to artificially segment those markets. So I doubt that the consumer will see any savings.

      I am not a fan of price discrimination either, but it does have some benefits. It allows drug companies to make life saving drugs much cheaper for developing countries, while still making a profit by charging much higher prices to people where they can. If you live in America you will not see any savings. If you live in Somalia, you probably will.

      If anything I think prices will go up as piracy gets harder and less user friendly.

      It's hard to make a product for less than $0. So for pirates, the price will definitely be going up on average.

      In any event I'm talking about the hardware were all paying a hidden amount to support current DRM and implement future DRM.

      You are not forced to pay for anything. You are free to support whatever DRM free media you want. The content owners can sell their media in whatever format they like. Maybe they will decide DRM isn't worth it. That's their decision to make.

      DRM can not work "better", if I can watch something I can copy it the question is how much loss. Remember that the further up the stack the more places you need to have DRM.

      DRM can work better. If the best way you can circumvent DRM is to record your monitor with a camcorder, I think most people would agree that the DRM is working pretty good. Furthermore, interactive media like video games, and other "non-media" things which one might want to prevent unauthorized access to, can be protected with DRM even if you are allowed to "watch it". You can't copy a video game with a camcorder.

      I'm more in they should get one or the other, the FBI etc should go after large commercial pirates, the ones feeding the guys on the street selling DVD etc. We should not be going after people making backups or transcoding, things that were legal since the timeshifting case of the early 80's.

      The real problem is that the justice system currently imposes penalties that far outweigh the damage caused by the crime of piracy. I don't think many people would have a problem with people being forced to buy the songs they were caught pirating (i.e. much closer to the actual financial damage caused).

      This is not an example of a DRM scheme, requiring the the LOC hold in escrow all DRM keys would require a new law. This is about being able to recover our digital heritage generations from now and has really nothing to do with the DRM itself. Merely picking a responsible party who is already tasked with cataloging and maintaining copies of these sorts of things.

      Which parties have access to private keys in an encryption/DRm scheme is absolutely an implementation detail. It doesn't require a new law. It could be a public service offered by the government or by a non profit organization, where participation is voluntary. You would be free to buy only DRM media whose keys are held by a trusted 3d party.

      Could their be good useful DRM sure, I doubt anybody major will ever implement it. Their are means today that can cost effectively curb piracy the corps involved choose not to use them.

      If it's useful, then people will implement it. I don't pretend to know what the most effective piracy control methods are. All I know is that it is possible (i.e. not impossible) for DRM to get better, and that if it does, more people will use it.

    32. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Why is it moral to eat? Animals depend entirely on other life for food. Plants get energy from the sun and convert raw materials into living tissue, animals mostly can't, and must eat plants or other animals to survive.

      Ownership is only a legal and social custom to keep order, stop people from fighting each other over who gets to use an item that can only be used by one group at a time, or who gets to consume a perishable item. The items themselves of course are completely indifferent to such niceties. The morality of it is that it promotes peace better than most other systems. It works quite well, but it could be more efficient to be more relaxed about ownership. I can't use all my possessions all the time, and have the constant problem of living with the clutter it causes. If I could borrow more things more readily, I wouldn't need to own as much. These new car rentals services like Uber are trying to fill an empty niche, allowing owners of goods that spend much time sitting idle to put them to greater use, in exchange for some compensation.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    33. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Why is it moral to eat? Animals depend entirely on other life for food. Plants get energy from the sun and convert raw materials into living tissue, animals mostly can't, and must eat plants or other animals to survive.

      I don't know if you are aware, but there are actually human beings that do not eat other animals. I'm not sure what this has to do with ownership.

      Ownership is only a legal and social custom to keep order, stop people from fighting each other over who gets to use an item that can only be used by one group at a time, or who gets to consume a perishable item.

      It is not the only method to accomplish this. There is also communism. We can have a central authority ensuring that everyone has fair use over all of humanity's collective possessions.

    34. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about vegetarianism. Animals have to eat other life to survive. Plants are alive. Is it moral to eat, whether that's plants or animals? As to what it has to do with ownership, eating is a taking, a stealing of other lives. The most fundamental thing any being owns is their own body. We should have a care not to be unconscious of the hypocrisy of screaming "thief!" over the mere copying-- not taking but just copying-- of the immaterial, when all of us are takers of food of which nearly all was once alive.

      Communism, you say? There are more choices than communism and capitalism. Ownership has many benefits. Ownership heads off a Tragedy of the Commons problem with useful goods. Most people are more careful with things that they own. And, as I said, ownership keeps our affairs more orderly, lessens reasons to get into a fight over who gets to use a scarce good. Greater ability to match owners of idle equipment with nearby people who need to rent them for a short time, with appropriate rules and compensations for handling issues of damage, loss, and wear and tear, would make our society more efficient. Even if honest, a communist central authority simply is not nimble enough to keep up with the millions of reallocations necessary to achieve greater efficiency than a capitalist system. Perhaps a business like Uber can improve matters. There's considerable overhead in just managing all the information necessary to track everything down to the smallest, cheapest items worth tracking.

      But when the things in questions are not scarce, ownership in the same style as applied to scarce things is just stupid. Learning and knowledge are valuable, but not scarce. Should we charge children for their education, make them take out student loans? When they graduate from high school and turn 18 years old, should they have to repay society for what their education cost?

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    35. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about vegetarianism. Animals have to eat other life to survive. Plants are alive. Is it moral to eat, whether that's plants or animals? As to what it has to do with ownership, eating is a taking, a stealing of other lives. The most fundamental thing any being owns is their own body. We should have a care not to be unconscious of the hypocrisy of screaming "thief!" over the mere copying-- not taking but just copying-- of the immaterial, when all of us are takers of food of which nearly all was once alive.

      What I am saying is that those kind of moral judgements are subjective. Simply claiming that ownership of physical or intellectual property or living property, is just your opinion. It doesn't carry any weight with someone who does not share that value.

      Communism, you say? There are more choices than communism and capitalism.

      I don;t think I claimed any kind of dichotomy.

      Ownership has many benefits.

      I never said it didn't. I was only giving a counter example to your claim that ownership was the only way stop people from fighting over resources.

      And you left out one very important benefit of ownership. It incentivizes production. One is more likely to produce something if they are then able to own it. This benefit extends to intellectual property as well, if society enforces intellectual property rights.

      since you are now making a utilitarian argument for ownership rather than an ethical one, this is the utilitarian argument for intellectual property.

    36. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      No, people are more likely to produce something if they benefit from it. That's quite different than owning it. Anyone can create and/or own something of no use or value. Factory work is all about being compensated for producing things that others own.

      Ownership is a means to aid people in gaining from their productivity. It is not the only means, and may not be the best means. It is a good way, but not so good that we should all clamor for the Ownership Society, asking that it be expanded into some kind of universal mechanism, applicable to all things. Intellectual property is one of many places ownership should not apply. We want to fairly compensate authors, artists, and other contributors. We don't need ownership to do it, it can be done with crowdfunding and other forms of patronage. Indeed, we have seen that ownership can be very bad at ensuring artists are fairly compensated, thanks to such cheats as Hollywood Accounting, and Work for Hire contracts. Big Media organizations have far more power than individual artists, and have often abused that power to bargain too hard. But most of all, that ownership model depends upon scarcity, and information is simply not scarce, nor can it be made to be scarce no matter how hard anyone tries, with technology such as DRM, or with legal means, anymore than gravity can be outlawed.

      We most certainly should not give up our natural rights to communicate among ourselves! This is what Big Media has demanded, even going so far as to threaten, bully, and lie with their pervasive propaganda, and commit all kinds of crimes, to push us into acceptance. It is an unconscionable demand, and should be denied, with prejudice.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    37. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      No, people are more likely to produce something if they benefit from it. That's quite different than owning it.

      Do you not think one would derive more benefit from owning something they created than merely having access (along with everyone else) to it? For one thing, it is pretty hard to make money charging for access to information that everyone already has access to for free.

      Factory work is all about being compensated for producing things that others own.

      Actually factory work is all about selling labor to others. A gardener shouldn't own my yard because he "created" the landscaping.

      Ownership is a means to aid people in gaining from their productivity. It is not the only means, and may not be the best means

      I never said it was. I am saying that "Ownership (physical or intellectual) is immoral" is a subjective claim.

      Debates can be had about whether ownership of physical or intelelctual property helps or hinders production in which scenarios (which is in my opinion the only convincing form of argument). Once you say X is immoral, there can be no discourse with someone who does not feel X is immoral.

      I am sympathetic to the argument that ownership is detrimental to to the productivity of society in certain areas (like intellectual property). I am not sympathetic to the argument that ownership is categorically immoral.

    38. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      it is pretty hard to make money charging for access to information that everyone already has access to for free.

      Restricting access to publicly available information is an impossible problem. DRM does not really work, and inconveniences and annoys customers who want to make legitimate use of what they bought. Outlawing communication does not work. Going on a moral crusade and demonizing everyone as pirates does not work. Therefore, the problem of making money from information must be solved differently. And there are solutions: crowdfunding, and other forms of patronage. There's also endorsements, advertising revenue, and performance. It's getting harder and harder to do it with restriction.

      And, the moral angle: restriction is an immoral way to make money from information. That is exactly what RMS complained about all those years ago when he needed some working software and could not fix it himself because it was restricted. We should all sit still and be quiet like good little children until Uncle Bill can be bothered to get around to fixing the bugs, for a big enough fee of course. The attempt to force the impossible to work anyway has cost us all hugely, and not just money either. We've had too many ordinary citizens railroaded in a court of law, given completely over the top penalties, without the plaintiffs having to prove that the defendants actually did anything illegal, because, you know, everyone does it. College students have been forced to give up their dreams of a college education, a mother has been forced into bankruptcy. We ought to have our digital public library up and running by now, but we don't. We should have been doing what Google Books is doing and more, but we can't thanks to our own copyright laws. Libraries have a minuscule online presence.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    39. Re:The best thing Keurig can do is die by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Restricting access to publicly available information is an impossible problem.

      Restricting access to publicly available information is indeed impossible. DRM does not do this. It instead restricts access to private information (e.g. a compressed video stream), and allows authorized users access to a transformed version of that information (e.g. a raw DVI signal or pixels on a monitor).

      DRM does not really work, and inconveniences and annoys customers who want to make legitimate use of what they bought

      It does work, which is why companies continue to use it. It obviously would be nice if it worked better. There are examples of DRM which do not annoy or inconvenience customers (e.g. steam).

      Outlawing communication does not work.

      DRM is a technical solution not a legal solution. I am not sure why you are conflating these 2 ideas.

      Going on a moral crusade and demonizing everyone as pirates does not work.

      I hope you are not suggesting I am demonizing anyone.

      Therefore, the problem of making money from information must be solved differently.

      I am not saying a better solution doesn't exist or can't work. I am saying that it is not impossible that there could be advances in DRM technology that make it less annoying and inconvenient and more effective at preventing unauthorized access. It has already improved significantly over the last decade. Things like HDCP and blu-ray, while far from perfect, are vast improvements for older technologies like macrovision and css. If you are morally opposed to DRM, then I supposed you wouldn't view these as improvements, but I am speaking strictly from a technical perspective.

      And, the moral angle: restriction is an immoral way to make money from information.

      Why is it immoral? How do you decide if something is immoral?

      We've had too many ordinary citizens railroaded in a court of law, given completely over the top penalties, without the plaintiffs having to prove that the defendants actually did anything illegal, because, you know, everyone does it. College students have been forced to give up their dreams of a college education, a mother has been forced into bankruptcy. We ought to have our digital public library up and running by now, but we don't. We should have been doing what Google Books is doing and more, but we can't thanks to our own copyright laws.

      None of this has anything to do with DRM, but rather our legal system.

  27. Somebody else has a worse coffee maker by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere (can't remember where) that some company has an Internet connected coffee maker. It's not a single serve device and looks like the "old fashioned" drip maker with a glass pot. This guy is connected to the Internet using your household LAN and if it can't connect it cannot be programmed to work. IIRC, Internet down = no coffee. No Internet at all = no coffee. At least the Keurig DRM can be defeated in several ways as shown on multiple YouTube videos.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:Somebody else has a worse coffee maker by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If you manage a company with recurrent networking problems / bad work by your networking department... this sounds like an ingenious appliance to put in the network management department / IT team's breakroom. Network Slow = Limited Coffee, Network down = No Coffee.... suddenly people will care.

  28. KOLD = Karbonator by slew · · Score: 1

    I can't see what need they may be filling with cold beverages, and I don't see people adding another appliance unless it is something quite "revolutionary." Am I missing an obvious need?

    Basically KOLD is a SodaStream like product. The reason they think it's revolutionary is that they got CocaCola to sign on to it.

    AFAIK, unlike SodaStream, KOLD will creates CO2 from a chemical reaction and pressurizes it with a pump (not feeding it from a proprietary pre-filled canister). Not sure how much DRM they were planning for this part, but I'm guessing not much now ;^)

    1. Re:KOLD = Karbonator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but since it's keurig, that coca-cola is gonna cost even more than buying it by the single-serve bottle... when it needs to cost less per serving than generic soda sold by the 2 or 3 liter bottle (which costs less, even, that single-serve bottle.. 3 liters for $1.00 or 500ml for $1.75).

      without needing co2 canisters, keurig could *really* have a positive impact on the environment with the new 'kold'..... but ONLY IF they priced their hardware reasonably, and the consumables lower than existing common products...

      under 1 penny per ounce for completed beverage should be their target retail price. but they're too fucking greedy for that, so is coca-cola, who along with pepsi is busy trying to redefine the 2 liter bottle to 1.5 or 1.25 liter at the same price as the old 2 liter.

      DRM failed with coffee because coffee grounds are *everywhere* you can buy any of 1000s of brands and styles, drop them in a filter pour hot water over it and make coffee. soda syrup has much more limited availability in retail channels. what about sodastream? they failed at soda pop because of price per serving of the resulting product -- not because of the concept of the co2 canisters but the combined cost of them and the syrups was still the same or higher than just buying soda pop... keurig's price per serving will be even higher with coca-cola on board and DRM to protect the system.

    2. Re:KOLD = Karbonator by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Sodastream is comparable in price to soda water on sale at the grocery, maybe even more expensive.

      I drink a lot of soda water, so I got a corny keg, a 5 lb CO2 cylinder, and a soda gun. A good premix gun is hard to find and the most expensive part, but you can use a post-mix gun, too. It's a few hundred $$ up front, but operating costs are a) water from the filtered tap and b) $10 every 6-7 months for a CO2 refill c) $20 every 5 years to get the cylinder proof tested. You can save on the cylinder by getting swappable steel ones from the gas supplier, but they don't look as nice. I go through 5 gallons of soda water every couple weeks and never have to deal with plastic bottles anymore.

  29. *Cough* Bullshit by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The company says they now plan to license more outside brands, and bring back “My K-Cup” reusable filters.

    If they really believed they were wrong about the things they were actually wrong about, then they would Open-Source the DRM technology and make the interoperability specs public domain, and stop trying to charge licensing dollars.

  30. vote by MiliusXP · · Score: 1

    Wow, "vote with your wallet" worked !!!

  31. Your outta your mind. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    My first impression of a coffee machine being sold at Walmart (Keurig) that only took specialized coffee pods and no others.

    And I read the box, think of all those who didn't, and just grabbed a handy coffee machine as the price wasn't bad.

  32. Well, duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People do NOT like lock-in by vendors. The situation with Keurig is akin to purchasing a pair of Nike sneakers, only to find that you can ONLY use Nike-branded laces or inserts!

    1. Re:Well, duh! by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      People do NOT like lock-in by vendors. The situation with Keurig is akin to purchasing a pair of Nike sneakers, only to find that you can ONLY use Nike-branded laces or inserts!

      ...or socks

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:Well, duh! by DrXym · · Score: 1
      They might not lock-in but we see time and time again that they will still buy shit that contains it - razor blades, electric toothbrushes, coffee pods, ink jet printers, mops, ball point pens, scented air fresheners, iPods / iPhones / iPads / Android, Kindle, countless online services etc. etc.

      Anything which has a consumable element to it is manufactured in such a way as to be proprietary and usually protected by design patents and / or DRM.

  33. K-Cup patent ran out. So they tried this by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Till about couple of years ago, K-cup was a patented property of Green Mountain. So everyone paid their fees to stamp "compatible" with Keurig on their pods. The patent has expired and others can manufacture K-cup compatible machines, without paying royalties to Green Mountain. To protect their turf they tried this dumb idea. Lots of people shrank from buying the 2.0 because the word spread, "it will work only with Green mountain pods".

    What makes this really a stupid move was that, there was no huge rush to make knock off copies of keurig machines. Very few machine makers went there. But the real dough for Green mountain was in the license fees paid by everyone making K cups. They stopped paying it and more players have entered the pod business.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  34. Nobody bought the 2.0 by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people looking for the older units, in fact they sell incredibly well. The 2.0 crap? absolutely nobody wants them.

    Dear Keurig want to save your company go back to the old 1.0 and stay there, refund everyone that was dumb enough to buy your 2.0 and send them an apology letter.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Nobody bought the 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Do you work at a Target?

    2. Re:Nobody bought the 2.0 by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      As your boss. Not go mop up puke in aisle 4 again you loser.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  35. Drip coffeemaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfectly happy with one of these machines. I've used for so long, Know just how much coffee to put into to make a small pot for myself. Add to this an under $20 electric grinder from Amazon and fresh beans from Costco, I can make better tasting coffee than anything out of the pods - yech! And not filling a landfill full of plastic either. The time to grind the beans, replace the filter and brew the coffee is well worth the taste.

  36. Why I bought the small office version by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    When our last Keurig died, I bought this one:

    http://www.keurig.com/Brewers/...

    I chose this one since it was a heavier duty machine that could accept a plumbed water line - and NO DRM.

    All Keurig needs to do is make good quality hardware and source good quality beans for their K-cups - it's not a difficult business model.

    1. Re:Why I bought the small office version by dltaylor · · Score: 1

      Of course, I can't buy one NOW!?

  37. They learned nothing. by Stan92057 · · Score: 2

    "The company says they now plan to license more outside brands, and bring back “My K-Cup” reusable filters."

    They learned nothing. They will continue to DRM the coffee maker just license More pods.I hope the pod makers flip them off as they should.They don't need Keurig,Keurig needs them.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:They learned nothing. by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      "The company says they now plan to license more outside brands, and bring back “My K-Cup” reusable filters."

      They learned nothing. They will continue to DRM the coffee maker just license More pods.I hope the pod makers flip them off as they should.They don't need Keurig,Keurig needs them.

      why don't we get the EPA to class-action them for all the waste produced with the DRM? They were shutting out the biodegradable Costco k-cups.

  38. Let's argue DRM by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    about a product that shouldn't exist.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  39. Buy smart by norite · · Score: 1

    Buy an espresso machine, instead of this pod garbage. coffee is much nicer and you can make whatever you want.

    --
    -- Fuck Beta
  40. Hear that MPAA & RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stuff your DRM. Won't buy it.

  41. We're too smart for you guys. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Literally, EVERYONE said "this is a really stupid idea, why would ANYONE buy one of those?" ...and now they say "Aw shucks, we didn't realize?"

    I hope their stock drops further just because of their arrogance or their stupidity, you pick one.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:We're too smart for you guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally, EVERYONE said "this is a really stupid idea, why would ANYONE buy one of those?"

      Do you mean DRMed coffee or the Keurig concept in general? It's ambiguous because they are both "really stupid ideas".

  42. Don't be a lazy a-hole by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 2

    buy a french press or a proper espresso machine and learn to make a decent cup of coffee without all the stupid prepackaged waste.

    1. Re:Don't be a lazy a-hole by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Or just buy an aerobie and be done with it.

    2. Re:Don't be a lazy a-hole by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      Sure, looks like fun, but I still want my cup of Joe after playing ;)

      http://aerobie.com/products/pr...

    3. Re:Don't be a lazy a-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off, you elitist twat-waffle.

  43. Keurig is not that great by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    I've used one of the old Keurigs for a while, but honestly, it's not that great to begin with: you pay a lot for coffee that is at best mediocre. If you're going to go the machine route, consider some of the other machines: Tassimo, Nespresso, Verismo, or Senseo. I think they all beat Keurig along some dimensions (price, quality, convenience). Or use the original, ESE Pods in a real espresso machine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

    1. Re:Keurig is not that great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They beat it in everything except marketing, and that's what counts.

      But having used the Nespresso Club site, I'm happy I don't have one. Most miserable online experience ever--fuck them; I don't care how smooth their espresso is.

  44. why use something patented anyway? by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    Coffee and espresso pods have been around since the 1950's. Keurig has brought nothing to the table other than marketing as far as I can tell. It's not clear their patent should even have been granted in the first place.

  45. It's over now by bobjr94 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People have found different brands they like better, they have no reason to come back. Licensing more bands of pods to work with your DRM machines is not the same as getting rid of it. People know that and will continue to avoid them.

    They had a good thing 2-3 years ago, every office and kitchen had a Keurig. they got greedy and lost it all. Like the story of the farmer killing the goose that lays the golden eggs, to try and get all the gold at once.

  46. So True. 'License' is not the right answer. by robbak · · Score: 1

    The right answer is to publish a document on your website, liberally licensed, that outlines exactly what you have to do to make a KC2 capsule, right down to the spectral properties and the recommended formulae of the ink. Then everyone will be able to produce completely compatible cartridges that make use of all the brewer's features.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    1. Re:So True. 'License' is not the right answer. by TWX · · Score: 1

      Too much work. There should be no special requirement to make a flimsy plastic vacuformed cup with a paper label glued across the top as a lid. There's literally no reason to add to the manufacturing cost when from the customer's perspective, the end product is a consumable liquid.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:So True. 'License' is not the right answer. by robbak · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say there is 'no' reason, just a weak one. Different pods could require different treatment - more or less time, liquid or temperature - information on these is also encoded into the 'DRM' information.

      Of course, in reality there is no reason to use a special fluorescent ink for this - apart from a foolish attempt at obscuring it! Really, they didn't think that the first person to find that a generic pod didn't work wouldn't examine the genuine pod under different light sources to find out?

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. What DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely I'm not the only one who googled a way around the DRM?

  49. Hatorade Distortion Field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or Apple -- you lock in your customers all you want if you're Apple.

    If there are better products out there, that do the same thing for less money than what Apple asks for...how are they "locked in"??? And no, needing an iPhone to run iPhone apps is not "lock in" any more than needing to stay on Android to keep using your apps purchased on the Play Store is "lock in".

  50. Yes, you were wrong. But not for the reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of ethic reasons I will remember to never buy your brand.

    Your reason of diminishing sales are just deserving of bankrupcy and fines.

  51. kill the k-cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Radiohead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They gave away and merely ASKED for donations. No limit, no minimum. They also sold special feature packs of physical media with collectible or memorabilia or signed stuff.

    They made much more money from that album than ANY album (or any three, IIRC) they had made while with a label.

    Something else to remember. When it comes to "You freetards with your FOSS GPL, you only want free stuff!", when it comes to app purchases on a request donation model, FOSS/OpenSource paid the most per purchase. Apple second. Microsoft third.

    Maybe having paid a shitload for a half-assed OS that whines and bitches, people want to pay less, since they've "already paid something". Maybe those other places attract people who are more likeable and generous.

    1. Re:Radiohead by TWX · · Score: 1

      I don't know how that applies to coffee; it's well established that once a band is well established and popular, that continuing to maintain relationships with third-party record labels is usually bad for the band as the label takes SO MUCH without providing much. When the band is new and needs to become established then the label may help, but the parasitic draw on the band is why so many have formed their own labels or distribution chains.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  53. Pods are stupid expensive by MyNicknameSucks · · Score: 1

    I know it's been said before (and most likely even within this thread), but it's worth repeating: coffee pods are stupidly expensive. Keurig's business is model is to package up beans that cost between $6 and $12 per pound at retail and jack the price up to, at the high end, $40 per pound.

    If you're in a household that drinks 3 or 4 cups a day, you can buy an all-in-one coffeemaker like a Jura (whole beans on one side, water on the other, coffee out the middle) and come out ahead in 2 or three 3 years. You also get a similar level of convenience, wider selection of coffee (especially at the higher end of the coffee spectrum), less trash (the grounds get dumped into a container, ready for composting) and, generally, a better cuppa (freshly ground beans make a difference).

    Yes, refilling your own pods is cheaper -- as is using a French press. But, when it comes to convenience and TCO, you've got better options.

  54. Even the sales guys know about it by PPalmgren · · Score: 2

    The keurig 2.0 pissed so many people off, that standard store clerks know about the keurig 2.0 and warn people away from it. I warned my stepmother about it before she went out to buy one as a present for someone, and then she got reminded again at the store. I was happy to know that they're actively pushing people away from an inferior product.

    Also of note, I found something funny in one of their third party k-cup purchases at my parent's house. It came with something called a 'freedom clip.' It goes over the sensor and does something to the 2.0 machine, preventing all the tomfoolery.

    1. Re:Even the sales guys know about it by TWX · · Score: 1

      This is an example where in a very large multilevel structure, the intentions of the overpaid people at the top can be completely destroyed by the lowest-paid workers at the bottom. Policy is meaningless when people so far removed from the top can simply ignore it or work contrary to it.

      I don't expect Keurig to do well with this down the road. They've made it clear that they do not intend to get rid of DRM, but the customers in this market know that the DRM is there and will continue to consider alternatives. If Keurig chooses to stop using DRM-enabled machines they still have to include the DRM in the K-cups, because owners of these machines will not accept that their fairly expensive coffee maker stops working because the latest cups down the road stop including the RFID or whatever they use.

      They've screwed themselves and were too stupid to see it coming.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  55. In all industries, DRM means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digital Revenue Minimization. This is merely yet another data point. DRM is means of communicating the word "no" to potential customers.

  56. coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda funny how nutty people get over their hot dirty water.

  57. Freedom Clip by pompetti · · Score: 1

    Rogers Family Coffee will give you a DRM defeating "Freedom Clip" that let's any K-cup work in the 2.0 Keurigs. I tried the 2.0 lid taped to an old K-cup trick for about a week. The Freedom clip is much easier. https://www.gourmet-coffee.com...

  58. Bought a Jura, never going back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Jura Capresso S9 and I'll never go back to dehydrated instant coffee pods again.

  59. This. Is. Slashdot! by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    There's still a few people posting "M$" and rambling about Sony's rootkited CDs (or whatever it was, I've forgotten the details already). Never underestimate the power or a slashdot grudge.

  60. weak shit coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The keurig made weak, shit coffee anyway.

    The Senseo OTOH made really good coffee, but it lost the single serve coffee wars.

  61. marriage by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    I will never buy a DRM coffee machine...

    Unless you're a prostitute, don't fuck your customer.

    Or Apple -- you lock in your customers all you want if you're Apple.

    sounds like marriage. and at that point it's just 'domestic dispute'

  62. 10oz -- 2 Weeks?! by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    A 32oz of beans lasts us (mostly me) about a week! Of course we use a coffee maker that makes good coffee, "Bunn Phase Brew 8 Cup Coffee Brewer" certified by SCAA

  63. by the makers of Aerobie by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    straight from the makers of aerobie (isn't that crazy?) you guys need to move to the aeropress. Just add hot water, wait 30 seconds, and you get a surprisingly incredible cup of espresso.

    1. Re:by the makers of Aerobie by lophophore · · Score: 1

      I have less waste than the aerobie. No only spent grounds. No bleached paper filters.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
  64. Mod Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until I read this, I was going to post the same thing. And I wouldn't have intended it as a joke.

    I use a French press and will never, ever, ever change.

    Ever.

    Maybe I don't use a straight razor, but I do use double-edge. No amount of marketing will ever convince me that a five bladed cheese grater will give me a closer shave that a single blade.

    Ever.

    You dig?

    Ever.

  65. Workaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just cut the foil top off a drm cup and tape it to the top of the Keurig. Problem solved.

    French press is better!

  66. The real reason by bitterblackale · · Score: 1

    Keurig coffee tastes awful, it's the most wasteful way to brew *anything*, and the devices inevitably turn into large petri dishes full of algae and bacteria.

  67. DRM by DQKennard · · Score: 1
    Tea. Earl Grey. Hot.

    bzzzt

    I'm sorry. Unauthorized data file for ..."Tea. Earl Grey"

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. Re: I'd like to see the environmental nightmare di by adolf · · Score: 1

    I had a decent burr grinder. It died, I fixed it, it died, I fixed it, and then I roached the motor.

    I replaced it with a whizzy-blade grinder, which seems to do almost as well with good technique.

    Regarding espresso, I did have one of those machines. If it were the hard plumbed push a button and pull a shot type that the barista at my local coffee sanctuary uses, I'd still have one.

    Instead, I donated it to the thrift store and someone else paid five bucks for it. Good for them for owning such a hated kit.

    So I've got my thermal carafe drip brew machine, a big percolator, and a French press. I want an alcohol or butane fuelled vacuum brewer, but.....

    And I'm totally not interested in spending my own dime on anything Kuereg.

  70. Re: I'd like to see the environmental nightmare di by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I had a decent burr grinder. It died, I fixed it, it died, I fixed it, and then I roached the motor.

    I'm on my second $50 Cuisinart, the first one was replaced under warranty and this one has long outlived that one.

    Regarding espresso, I did have one of those machines. If it were the hard plumbed push a button and pull a shot type that the barista at my local coffee sanctuary uses, I'd still have one.

    Instead, I donated it to the thrift store and someone else paid five bucks for it. Good for them for owning such a hated kit.

    Well, someone like me but where you live thanks you. And if they've got a lady, they thank you too.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"