Slashdot Mirror


Enthusiast Resurrects IBM's Legendary 'Model F' Keyboard (popularmechanics.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Popular Mechanics: You may not know the Model F by name, but you know it by sound -- the musical thwacking of flippers slapping away. The sound of the '80s office. The IBM Model F greeting the world in 1981 with a good ten pounds of die-cast zinc and keys that crash down on buckling metal springs as they descend. It's a sensation today's clickiest keyboards chase, but will never catch. And now it's coming back. The second coming of the high-quality Model F (not to be confused with its more affordable plastic successor, the Model M) isn't a throwback attention grab from IBM, nor a nostalgia play from Big Keyboard. Instead, it's the longtime work of a historian in love with the retro keyboard's unparalleled sound and feel, but frustrated by the limitations of actual decades-old tech.

The Model F Keyboards project, now taking preorders for the new line of authentic retro-boards, was started by Joe Strandberg, a Cornell University grad who's taken up keyboard wizardry as a nights-and-weekends hobby. He started as a collector and restorer of genuine Model F keyboards -- originally produced from 1981 to 1994 -- a process that familiarized him with their virtues and their flaws... Working with a factory in China, Strandberg has carefully overseen the reproduction process one step at time, from the springs to the unique powder-coating on the keyboard's zinc case. Despite the expense (Strandberg estimates spending $100,000 to revive the tooling necessary for the production run), it was the only viable option given the kind of abuse your average keyboard takes on a daily basis. "With 3D printing," he says, "the keyboard wouldn't last a year."

The first prototypes have just left the assembly line, and he's already racked up over a quarter of a million dollars in pre-orders. Does anyone else fondly remember IBM's hefty and trusty old keyboards?

184 comments

  1. Not this again. by HornWumpus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Plenty of cherry buckling spring keyboards available at a reasonable price.

    Besides...Gateway made the best keyboards back then. Copy target selection failure.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Not this again. by nuckfuts · · Score: 2

      Plenty of cherry buckling spring keyboards available at a reasonable price.

      Ya, I'm typing on one now, but it ain't made with "a good 10 pound of die-cast zinc".

    2. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plenty of cherry buckling spring keyboards available at a reasonable price.

      Besides...Gateway made the best keyboards back then. Copy target selection failure.

      Comparing Gateway to an original IBM? Are you fucking kidding me?

    3. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Besides...Gateway made the best keyboards back then.

      Yeah, right.

      What's next, will you try to claim that a tool from Harbor Freight is better than a Snap-On tool ?

      One thing Slashdot always does is bring the idiots out of the woodwork. And yes, I am calling you an idiot, Mister HornWumpus.

    4. Re:Not this again. by PIBM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shipping it in a box, in a Styrofoam padding?? WTF, if it can't be shipped straight up, that's not a model F.

    5. Re: Not this again. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're just mad because your Mac Pro doesn't have a PS/2 port on it.

    6. Re: Not this again. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 5, Funny

      Without padding and a box it is a hazard to the other items in the shipping center.

    7. Re:Not this again. by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 2

      Model Ms have always been my fave but typing on Cherry Blues right now and all is well.

    8. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many Snap-on tools are just junk made in China with the brand name slapped on.

    9. Re:Not this again. by Misagon · · Score: 2

      Cherry's clicky switches do not use buckling springs. They have a much inferior tactile feel (and less of a sound as well).

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    10. Re:Not this again. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      How do they compare to the ~ $150 WASD mechanical keyboards?

      http://www.wasdkeyboards.com/i...

    11. Re: Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cherry MX switches are NOT buckling spring. They are mechanical but not the same mechanism at all.

    12. Re:Not this again. by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gateway? I think you misspelled "Northgate". The Omnikey Ultra was my all time favorite.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    13. Re:Not this again. by rdelsambuco · · Score: 1

      NO NO NO NO NO. You get what you pay for! Always! What's the point of having more money if you can't get better things for more of it?!!!

      --
      I comment occasionally so that I can mod others -1 overrated or -1 offtopic.
    14. Re:Not this again. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I've been using Model "M"'s from Unicomp for awhile and have been happy with them.

      I'm trying to find out the difference betweent he F and the M....?

      What are the defining differences?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, Model M's are over-hyped... the key press force required is too much, your fingers will be sore after an hour or so. Waste of money buying one off ebay.

    16. Re:Not this again. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      The WASD keyboards use a cherry switch, as do most mechanical keyboards. The ones in question recreate the buckling spring.

      Personally, I really like the cherry switches, but I get if someone wants them springs back.

    17. Re: Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno. I guess if you have a lot of money you could always eat it. Mmmmmm currencylicious.

    18. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said by the AC, being critiqued by the AC....

      Obviously you have never had to type on an old manual typewriter.... too much force? pffffft.

    19. Re:Not this again. by CMECC · · Score: 1

      Gateway? I think you misspelled "Northgate". The Omnikey Ultra was my all time favorite.

      I completely agree. I own both the Northgate and several Model M's, and the Northgate Omnikey Ultra is worlds better than the IBM or Gateway keyboards.

    20. Re: Not this again. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Elfen Lied. The lab experiment burnt money to keep warm because they weren't told the connection between the paper and what the food vendor wanted.

    21. Re: Not this again. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      She, she, the nonhuman was a she.

    22. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have used a manual typewriter and while they require quite a bit of force to type, they also have a "give in" factor, whereby your finger is cushioned when the key is at the bottom-most point -- so it's comfortable.

      No such thing in a computer keyboard, where you face some resistance initially, then suddenly the resistance is gone, and your finger moves with some speed until it comes to a stop suddenly as key cap reaches the bottom -- very uncomfortable.

    23. Re:Not this again. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Cherry mechanicals certainly beat your basic rubber domes; and have become conveniently widely available; but they are a completely different type of keyswitch than used in either the model F or model M. Given the price, you'd really, really, have to care; but the differences aren't confined to a more industrial enclosure.

    24. Re: Not this again. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Or I could put the paper currency in my woodstove and heat myself with it in winter.

    25. Re:Not this again. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      My typing class you got some times (like a week) on the mechanical, then a week on the electric, then back to the mechanical, etc. Was so lovely when you were on the electric.

    26. Re: Not this again. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0

      Except for Zenit cameras?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    27. Re:Not this again. by jcr · · Score: 2

      Gateway made the best keyboards back then.

      Nope. The keyboards that Honeywell-Microswitch made for HP's terminals were the best, no contest.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    28. Re:Not this again. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm trying to find out the difference betweent he F and the M....?

      I've been having some trouble with that lately too. Back when I was in school the one with a penis was the M and the one with the vagina was the F. But apparently it's a little more complicated than that now. ;-)

    29. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. But they are not PC keyboards. When I was in school I always tried to get to the lab early to snag one of the HP terminals. HP used to make really, really, good stuff. Even their calculators had great keyboards.

    30. Re:Not this again. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have several including this glorious OmniKey Ultra. I love a keyboard with the frickin CONTROL key where God intended it to be. What I really need is a way to connect the ancient 5-pin DIN to something more recent.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    31. Re:Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm trying to find out the difference betweent he F and the M....?

      According the S, J, W's, nothing. Unless you've transformed your F ton an M or vice versa, in which case the difference is a moral right which their keyboard insurance is mandated to pay for, but not even their insurance is allowed to ask which model they are at any time in the transformation lest they be be branded as key-phobic and have shrieking protesters doing "jazz hands" to applaud whoever "I am non-keyed! Keys are a myth!!!" speaker shows up.

      Sorry, it was too easy.

    32. Re:Not this again. by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

      You are 100% correct about that control key

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
    33. Re: Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Because you made that look pretty hard.

    34. Re:Not this again. by Megane · · Score: 1

      I was about to post the same thing. Also approved by Jerry Pournelle. I have two different versions of them somewhere, one with the F-keys both at the top and the left. A year or so ago I dumped and started disassembling their EPROMs in hopes that someday when I get around to it, I could make my own keyboard controller for USB. I still need to catch up on the USB side, but I've made an STM32F103-based device be a keyboard before, so I have a pile of "bluepill" boards ready while I get the USB code going.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    35. Re: Not this again. by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      Funny, I still have one here, and after years of abuse, it probably needs a little realignment on the mirror (slightly out of focus). Yes, built like a tank.

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    36. Re: Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not actually paper but rather cloth with some paper mixed in.

    37. Re: Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your issue is with all computer keyboards then not just the model m.

    38. Re: Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the tool. I've yet to break my Harbor Freight 10lb sledge, and their 44" tool chests are actually a whole lot closer to tool truck brand chests than any other chest you can buy.

    39. Re:Not this again. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      In other news: Cherry makes buckling spring keyswitches.

      Hint: They don't, Cherry use a completely different clicker mechanism.

      --
      No sig today...
    40. Re: Not this again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cherry is not a buckling spring switch. Completely different design and feel. The only bucklimg springs sold tolday are from Unicomp, and the build quality leaves a bit to be desired.

  2. XT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does it come with an authentic XT connector so I have to use XT>PS/2>USB so I can use it with my modern computer?

    1. Re:XT? by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

      My Model M has a 9 pin din with a connector to PS/2. Fortunately even the motherboard I bought last year still has PS/2 connectors or I'd have to add a PS/2 to USB and a scaffolding to keep things in place :) .

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    2. Re:XT? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      I'd have to add a PS/2 to USB

      Does that even work?

      I had a bunch of Keytronic Flexpro ergo keyboards that had the XT five pin DIN connector. I used a DIN->PS/2 converter for years with good success. Several times I tried adding a PS/2->USB converter but it never worked for me.

      The Keytronic was decent. I needed it for my RSI. I believe Keytronic were the OEM for Sun's keyboards back in the day, which were decent. My last Flexpro died a few years ago. Now I'm waiting for bloody https://ultimatehackingkeyboar... to deliver the keyboards I ordered from them. They're at least a year past due. :-/

    3. Re: XT? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      The are PS/2 to USB plugs that require circuitry in the keyboard/mouse

    4. Re:XT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      PS/2 to USB converters are just physical adapters, and were made for mice that could detect which type of socket they were connected to.
      DIN to PS/2 converters are just physical adapters, as the two connections actually had the same electrical spec.

      Of course, no DIN connector era keyboard can output USB communication, as it hadn't been defined yet!

    5. Re:XT? by Megane · · Score: 1

      In my experience, an "authentic" Model M has an RJ-style connector with the clips on the side instead of the top. Back in the day I got quite a few of both AT and PS/2 cables for them. The AT connector just needs a simple dongle adapter to PS/2. And of course they have no Windows keys.

      But I'd rather just replace its controller board with a micontroller to make a USB version.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    6. Re:XT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that even work?

      Yes. I use a cheap Chinese USB 1.1 / PS2 adapter and it works fine (KB & mouse to usb). Perhaps it just needs a bit of trial/error on various adapters.

    7. Re:XT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most USB to PS2 and vice versa adapters are dumb pin converters. They require the chipset in the keyboard to identify if it is receiving USB or PS2 signaling and to switch as appropriate. Thus an old XT keyboard and all PS2 keyboards that existed before USB wouldn't know what to do with the signaling and choke. I'd wager that some modern USB keyboards probably wouldn't work with PS2 to USB adapters either, as we get farther and farther from needing PS2 support, i'm sure that many keyboard makers might be dropping support for the PS2 signaling just to cut costs.

      Really if you were designing a brand new keyboard chipset today, would you even bother building in PS2 support? Even if it was there could it possibly be buggy PS2 support since hardware needing it is disappearing?

    8. Re:XT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it works. I have an original Lexmark model M that has a DIN connector to Ps/2 adapter and then to a Ps/2 to USB adapter. it works fine. there is a model m enthusiast web site that lists the USB converters that work, not all do.

    9. Re:XT? by tsa · · Score: 1

      I connected a keyboard to my little iMac that way because I hated the keyboard that came with it.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    10. Re:XT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the connector is the most glaring part. This Model F seems to be a classic case of form over function keys... ...I've already got my coat.

    11. Re:XT? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      USB to PS/2 adapters are a mess.

      First there are the passive adapters. These will only work if the keyboard actually supports USB but comes with a PS/2 plug. You can usually identify these because they only have one PS/2 socket.

      Then there are active adapters which nearly always have two PS/2 sockets. In theory a well-engineered active adapter should work with any PS/2 perhiperal or AT keyboard (the AT and PS/2 keyboards used the same protocol but a different connector). In practice I have found them hit and miss at least when used with KVM switches (I am not an old keyboard fetishist so I don't know how well they work with those). I found the Startech ones better then the no-name generics but they still seem to go crazy from time to time.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  3. Selectric by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    long live Selectric!

    1. Re:Selectric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It turns out that Selectric typewriters did not have spring-based keys like the Model F. The Selectric had individual mechanical linkages actuated by each key. These engaged various clutches to couple the motor to the printing mechanism.

      I believe the Wheelwriter was completely electronic, however, with different versions having either Model F or Model M keyboards depending on the year of release.

      dom

  4. Ever taken one apart? by mschuyler · · Score: 3, Funny

    I figured I would do that to "clean" it. About 500 parts sprung out. I never got it back together again.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  5. Aaand they are already slashdotted... by mellon · · Score: 1

    Impressive—this article hasn't been up very long. You can look at the web site, but the order page is the sad.

    1. Re:Aaand they are already slashdotted... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can't remember having seen a site slashdotted in a long time....

      I finally just got the order page up. Prices start at $325. No thanks.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:Aaand they are already slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? That's barely more than the list price in 1981. Considering that the original was $670 in 2017-dollars, you're actually getting it at half-price!

      And if you think about it as something you can pass down to your children and grandchildren (like a cast iron skillet), the cost ends up being less than $1 per month.

      dom

    3. Re:Aaand they are already slashdotted... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I can't remember having seen a site slashdotted in a long time....

        I finally just got the order page up. Prices start at $325. No thanks.

      The site probably still ran on 1995 hardware.

  6. How is this better than a Model M? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unicomp has been making brand new Model Ms for years, using the same tooling that was originally used by IBM to make them.

    What makes the Model F better, other than the historical angle? And if it's just the historical reasons, why bother with a $300 remake instead of the real thing, when you can just buy a new Model M from Unicomp for a lot less money and get the same feel with identical inauthenticity?

    If you're confused reading this, welcome to the club. :)

    1. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's made out of metal.

    2. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Model M is buckling spring over a membrane. The Model F is buckling spring over a capacitive PCB. The F is a far more complex design, it's lighter to type, has a louder sound, full n-key rollover, and is much more durable.

      Crazy to think the Model M is the "cheap" solution, huh?

    3. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Misagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Some connoisseurs find that the Model F's mechanism has a somewhat nicer feel than the Model M's.
      Because the sensing is capacitive and not using a measly membrane, the mechanism is more durable and allows for N-key rollover.

      Also, Unicomp does not make the Model M in a compact form factor (relatively speaking). IBM used to have a Space-Saving Keyboard back in the day, but vintage "SSK"s on the second-hand market are quite sought-after and therefore pricey.

      The build-quality of the buckling spring keyboards has also gradually gone down throughout the years. The Model F keyboards of old had case parts of parts of metal. Even the first Model M keyboards weight about half a kg (about a lb) more than those Model M keyboards made by Unicomp (and the last IBM-branded ones before that).

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    4. Re: How is this better than a Model M? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      The only problem with Unicomp is the pointer stick... not quite a genuine Trackpoint (springier w/more travel than the original M2), but with the same flawed pointer-stick button design that wears out in a few years & eventually dies.

      I actually own two genuine Model M2 keyboards (a M, with pointer stick). The keyboards are fine, but the Trackpoint buttons died years ago... and apparently, it's NOT an easy repair.

    5. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly the Space Saving Keyboard, but Unicomp does offer a compact version of the Model M: UltraClassic Keyboards.

      From the page:

      It's Ultra because it uses a newly designed clamshell cover set reducing the footprint by 20% and eliminating almost ½ pound of plastic.

    6. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by pem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Louder sound? That's what I'm looking for! My co-workers will be so happy to hear I'm replacing my Model M!

    7. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      > full n-key rollover

      It's like fucking impossible to get this working these days. I couldn't find a mobo that met my needs AND had a PS2 port, and in *practice*, N-key rollover is never supported in USB. Frustrating. My keyboard supports it, but that isn't enough without a PS2 port.

    8. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, I have one of those - bought it new at a ham radio flea market. It is by far my all time favorite. I love the size (I neither want nor use a numeric keypad) and the feel. From reading this article and people's comments, I wish I had an SSK using the Model F's construction with a USB connector. Would make the Apple bluetooth keyboard I am typing this on look like the joke that it is.

    9. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      The Das Keyboard got Nkey to work over USB. From my understanding it connects as multiple keyboards as to keep that feature.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unicomp keyboards have a pretty terrible build quality, and I speak as somebody who is typing this on a Unicomp ultra classic. The molding is terrible, with sharp flashing all over the place and on most keycaps. I had to spend a bunch of time with an xacto knife trimming off flashing to make the thing presentable (and to make it stop scratching me). The top plate of the keyboard also doesn't fit tightly to the bottom half, so the thing creaks if you press on the top plate.

      Overall, it's a nice typing experience, but they're severely overpriced for the very poor level of quality on offer.

    11. Re: How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hamfest.

    12. Re: How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I have an original, never used, IBM keyboard that has a sticker on the back that says "Model M2", has a date of "25Feb91", and has a number pad and does not have a Trackpoint. The keyboard, monitor, computer, and a large stack of 3 1/2" disks were a gift from my former boss when he closed the company. He bought it all brand new (486 I think) because people kept telling him he needed one. He set it up on his desk but never plugged it in. The entire front of the monitor was covered in post-it notes.

    13. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by fredex · · Score: 1

      I used to use an XT keyboard. When the AT came out I played with one a little and noted to myself that the keyboard didn't feel as nice.

      still, the At keyboard beats heck out of any modern membrane keyboard. and better than my cherry-mx keyboard too, though it also beats heck out of any membrane keyboard.

      I used to have some Northgate keyboards, and regret having ever disposed of them.

    14. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Megane · · Score: 1

      The standard HID configuration for keyboards (the one that works with BIOS at boot time) has one byte of 8 modifier keys, plus 6 bytes for other keys. This limit comes from the "slow" 1.5Mbit speed of USB only allowing 8 bytes of data in a transaction. (I can't remember right now what the other byte is.) There are no key up or key down events, just a list of currently pressed keys. Anything beyond that requires the host to use a new HID configuration with a larger data response, and presumably needs the 12Mbit speed as well.

      The idea in the previous reply about pretending to be multiple keyboards (probably as a composite device) sounds like an interesting new approach to the problem.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    15. Re: How is this better than a Model M? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      The entire front of the monitor was covered in post-it notes.

      So "Windows compatible" then.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    16. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it have been too difficult for you to go read the article and visit the maker's webpage where he answers the very question that has you so puzzled?

    17. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my original Model M's, except for the stupid custom modular keyboard jack and PS/2 only support.
      You can get a very close Model M model from Unicomp (www.pckeyboard.com), and supposedly they are built from the original moulds that IBM's lexmark division used back when the PS/2 Model M was produced. They are lighter though. The outer shell is flimsier plastic. The feel is the same though.

      I do not understand how anyone can type on the crap keyboards produced today! Once you have spent 30 years on this type of keyboard, you just can't use any other type.

    18. Re:How is this better than a Model M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ummed and ahhhed for a while about hunting down an authentic model-M, or buying a remade model from Unicomp.

      But I settled in the end for a new keyboard from Das Keyboard and have been very happy with it.

      http://www.daskeyboard.com/ ...but not the "cloud connected" keyboard they are advertising on their page, that thing has the AIDS.

  7. Stack of 'Em by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2

    I have a stack of the original IBM XT keyboards in the storeroom. They are PC-XT, so will not work on newer ('286 and up) machines. And they are 83 key so do not have the number pad. They mate up nice to the stack of original PC-XT machines in the same room. ( no XT clones allowed, though there is a stack of salvaged clone motherboards.)

    1. Re:Stack of 'Em by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Oh, those without number pads are actually more sought after than the common type that do have them. If you could persuade your manager to let you have them ... *wink* *wink*.

      ... and there is firmware and build instructions freely available for building adapters from XT protocol to USB.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    2. Re: Stack of 'Em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The storeroom at home, actually. Work pitced this stuff out awhile back. Also nabbed four Commodore SX-64s from that lab.

    3. Re:Stack of 'Em by rnturn · · Score: 1

      I've got one with the XT connector. Glad to hear there are conversion plans out there for USB. The old XT-to-PS/2 adapters are a PITB.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  8. It's okay for your one-person office by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I'm old enough to remember being in a computing lab filled with clicky keyboards back then. Heck, I remember how a room filled with typewriters sounded.

    I'll take today's quiet keyboards, thank you very much.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Informative

      The IBM Model F and M were specifically designed to mimic the feel and sound of IBM Selectric typewriters, since those were pretty much THE STANDARD for typewriters in offices at the time.

      This way when employees would move from their Selectric to a computer, the keyboard would have a familiar feel and sound.

      So yeah, the wonderful feel of these keyboards goes back to the 1960s when IBM perfected the Selectric.

    2. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cherry MX series switches come in four basic types. One, I forget which, has a nice clicky feel but is also very quiet. A variety of keyboards use them and some aren't that expensive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by DogDude · · Score: 2

      I couldn't disagree more. It was wonderful white noise.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by Chrontius · · Score: 2

      Cherry Brown.

      Matias also makes an Alps-alike that has similar properties.

    5. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly it. I'll continue on my "ancient" 2002 Maxim Kinesis that is quiet and works just fine. This keyboard was a replacement for the excellent Microsoft (heaven forbid!) Natural keyboards I had used previously (in fact the Microsoft hardware division has been superb! Even on my Linux machines that I have been using as my primary OS since 1991 [yes, I was there]).

    6. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Thanks. You are right, they keyboard I have now is MX Brown switches. Feels good and the sound is quiet but just audible enough for a little feedback in a quiet room.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      My junior-high typing class - where I learned how to type properly - had a mix of Selectrics and mechanical typewriters, while my folks had some portable mechanical made by Royal (IIRC - I can recall the plastic case/cover, anyway). I can remember the frustration with those manual typewriters - getting two or more different letters' strike bars jammed together, having to carefully reposition the paper when you needed to correct a typo you didn't immediately notice, replacing the ink ribbons (or having the ribbons come out of the guides)...

      The Selectrics took some getting used to, but were definitely nicer to type on once you adjusted. They were still subject to some of the aforementioned issues, though.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by antdude · · Score: 2

      At my former employer, my cubicle neighbors hated my loud and fast typings on clicky Dell keyboards (not even Model M and F types)! They were mostly females too! :/ I even made a poll and posted their comments in my http://aqfl.net/node/5825 ... ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I once dated a woman who occasionally out-typed her Selectric at work. Her hands were amazing.

    10. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I like how you got four respondents who chose one of the "I don't use keyboards" options. There aren't that many jobs where a person won't at least occasionally need to use a keyboard (even if it's just to log one's hours).

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    11. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The cherry brown is the quiet tactical switch. I have it for my keyboard. It still makes a lot of noise, far more then the membrane. But I think it is because I still haven't learned to type lightly.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re: It's okay for your one-person office by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      My JH typing class had a mix of mechanical and ps/1 (monitor and computer combo).

    13. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buys some dampner rings if none are installed You can get a set of 100/150 for like nothing on ebay. It seriously helps A LOT.

    14. Re: It's okay for your one-person office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dated a woman like that.

      I always brought a bottle of Jergens with me on dates.

    15. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      But I'm old enough to remember being in a computing lab filled with clicky keyboards back then. Heck, I remember how a room filled with typewriters sounded.

      I'll take today's quiet keyboards, thank you very much.

      They make quiet mechanical keyboards - Cherry seems to have taken things to heart and have a line of quiet and noisy switches. I have a Logitech one using Cherry MX Browns and it's not as loud. Sure I can make it loud, but it's a lot quieter. Not as quiet as membrane/dome keyboards, but a LOT quieter.

      At least, OSHA wouldn't have to come around and force your office to pick up ear defenders for everyone.

      I have to admit, after work got me my mechanical keyboard, I rather enjoy them. It's not a model M by far, but it's a nice experience.

    16. Re:It's okay for your one-person office by dindi · · Score: 1

      MS mouse and MS keyboard quality was indeed pretty good.

      I am using the Kinesis Advantage and it rocks. I was looking at the Maxim, but AFAIK it is rubber dome and I went through those 1-2 a year.

      I actually replaced the brown MX to blue MX in one of my Advantages. Super CLICKY :)

  9. Modem F / M Comparison Chart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Modem F / M Comparison Chart by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Man... only a 2 key rollover on the Model M - that would be of no use whatsoever for me today.

    2. Re:Modem F / M Comparison Chart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just checking that out. It's false.Check the creditials, it goes to number 14 which is a reddit page. The reddit page has nothing there specifically about the model M except a link about the unicomp keyboards. The link about the unicomp keyboards goes to a lousy forum post. Funny if whoever added that part to the wiki page had a strong argument that the model M has 2kro then they would link directly to a credible site saying so but they cant.

    3. Re:Modem F / M Comparison Chart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, the original model M had ps/2 ports. ps/2 uses hardware interupts.
      ps/2 has full n-key rollover, aren't polled (completely interrupt based) and it is impossible for it to be delayed by the usb bus being used by other devices.

      I would say whoever 'found' the model m has 2kro used a crappy ps/2 -> usb dongle which limited the connection to 2kro.

    4. Re:Modem F / M Comparison Chart by Megane · · Score: 1

      If true, the reason is likely a lack of diodes in the matrix to prevent ghosting. Diodes are required for true N-key rollover, but it should be possible to have pseudo-N-key rollover by allowing any number of keys from the same row or column, and stop generating keypresses when a ghost happens. (Modifier keys are usually on their own inputs to keep them out of the matrix.)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  10. $300-400... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why not just get over it and buy a $10 keyboard?

    1. Re:$300-400... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Because $10 keyboards are crap.

      - They don't have the right feel for the weight of the keys
      - It feels cheap
      - Is the spacing in between keys correct?
      - Is it going to last? Stop filling up our landfills with cheap garbage.
      - Did I mention it feels CHEAP?
      - Do they have the raised ridges on the F and J keys?

      You can pry my Logitech Illuminated Thin Keyboard K740 from my cold, dead hands but I can understand someone wanting a _quality_ keyboard.

    2. Re:$300-400... by Bigbutt · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've had $10 keyboards. Heck, I have a $100 Mac keyboard. The feel isn't the same. When I'm typing on one of my Model M's, I know what I'm typing is getting through. With the squishy keyboards, I keep having to backspace because I'm missing a letter, which sucks when I'm on a unix box typing in commands (which I do most of the day).

      I've had my Model M since 89 and it still works great (I'm on it now). Work has provided Dell keyboards, Mac keyboards, and various other brand and non-name brand keyboards. Just nothing works like the IBM I have, to the point that I bought a second one just on case :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    3. Re:$300-400... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      > Do they have the raised ridges on the F and J keys?

      Fuck those things. I want to be able to remap the keys to Dvorak, like a sane person.

      WASD keyboards will sell you ones with the ridges on U and H, at least.

  11. IBM Model M Keyboard by Andrew+Lindh · · Score: 2

    I'm sill using an original 1990's IBM Model M (PS2 style) every day. I've changed OS and computers over the decades but not the keyboard. I have to take it apart every few years and clean out the stuff from under the keys. It may be the reduced cost version of the Model F but it's still a usable, sturdy, and reliable keyboard.

    1. Re:IBM Model M Keyboard by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Same here. Been using an IBM Model M since 1999. Sadly not the same M, as the keyboard decoder died in my last one, but when I got the keyboards in the late 90s I decided to snatch up a few spares because I knew they'd become harder to find with time.

  12. Shut Up... by Shuh · · Score: 2

    ... And Take My Money!

    1. Re:Shut Up... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      With that price, he'll be taking ALL of your money.

  13. But, Why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are way better keyboard projects. Qwerty, staggered keyboards are a terrible reminiscent of mechanical typewriters.

    Columnar keyboards like Ergodox, and derivatives like Ergodox ez, Keyboard.io and multipxd are eons ahead on ergonomics.

    About key layout: Qwerty Dvorak Colemak Workman. Any day.

    IBM model F switches are great. but please, use them in a proper, modern keyboard form factor and key layout.

    1. Re:But, Why??? by xforce · · Score: 1

      Workman > Colemak > Dvorak > Qwerty

  14. You Have Got To Be Kidding Me by WindowsStar · · Score: 2

    Really!! I mean Really!!! I just cleaned out my storage unit a few months back that had stuff in it for 20 years. I just tossed 50 of the original IBM keyboards because no one wanted them, Some of them with such light use they still had the original box. Posted them on eBay and Craigslist for months no-one wanted them. Now everyone wants one. WTH!!

    1. Re:You Have Got To Be Kidding Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really!! I mean Really!!! I just cleaned out my storage unit a few months back that had stuff in it for 20 years. I just tossed 50 of the original IBM keyboards because no one wanted them, Some of them with such light use they still had the original box. Posted them on eBay and Craigslist for months no-one wanted them. Now everyone wants one. WTH!!

      did they have AT style (DIN) connectors or PS2 cables?

    2. Re:You Have Got To Be Kidding Me by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Was it really Model M or Model F keyboards, and did you sell them for a reasonable price?

      Too often on eBay I see sellers trying to sell some vintage but crap rubber dome keyboard for much more than it is worth. I recon that they must have seen some real collectors' item sell for a lot and not recognised what made that one more special.
      And yes, different markets are different and prices fluctuate. In the US, the going price was around $30 for a regular Model M a few years ago, but over here in Sweden the going price has been up to $180 recently.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:You Have Got To Be Kidding Me by vovin · · Score: 2

      My impression is that http://clickykeyboards.com/ would have taken them off your hands and listed them as well.

      Real shame that ...

  15. You asked in the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you had posted them on Deskthority or /r/mechmarket, where the serious keyboard-nerds hang out, I suspect you would have seen different results.

  16. Call me when you have beam springs by niks42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Buckling springs were a cost reduction over the ultimate keyboard design - which was Keyboard D and associated. Those were the "beam spring" keyboards that shipped with the IBM 3278, IBM 3279 and so on. Absolutely fantastic keyboards, wonderful touch, a near perfect force/displacement profile. They were quiet - so quiet, we had to put an electric clicker into the keyboards, software selectable so typists could hear the keystrokes.

    I had one for years and years. I had an interface that supplied it with the +8.5v, +5vand -2.2v it needed, took its parallel output and mapped it to an ASCII symbol set. I had one wired to a 6809 Forth machine for a few years, but it fell into disrepair when the IBM PC arrived, and suddenly I had a C compiler to code with.

    1. Re:Call me when you have beam springs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used several of those in the early 90's... yes, they are much better than the Model F's (there were several of those, as well as Model M's). And they're even heavier: will-amputate-your-toes-if-you-re-unlucky-enough level of heavy...

      Estimated keyboard lifetime for a 327x terminal with one of those: 25 years of heavy use (~16h/day).

  17. If I'm spending that kind of money on a keyboard.. by mark-t · · Score: 2

    ... then I'm going to want to have a clear rubber covering on it that can to protect it from things like accidental spills, even while using it (my roommate back in the day always referred to the one I had at the time as a keyboard condom). Back then, there were just the two styles of keyboard, either XT or extended XT style, and you could get a cover for either one. If something spills on it, you just wipe it with a damp cloth and you're done, or if it gets really bad you peel it off and wash it As far as I know they don't make those anymore because there's too many styles of keyboards now.

  18. I don't see this happening.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see this happening for the "Microsoft Natural Keyboards". Every time I see one, I am tempted to use a band saw to separate the two sides.

  19. /. Effect in Effect by Shuh · · Score: 1

    The original site is unresponsive.

    1. Re:/. Effect in Effect by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The /. effect affects my reading experience so as to effect a negative affect on my mind.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  20. and if I could find an APL one as well ... by niks42 · · Score: 1

    .. I would be delighted!

    1. Re:and if I could find an APL one as well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beam springs are more complex - there are if I remember correctly a total of 7 parts of the switch module, compared to 3 of the Model F, with more strict tolerances. They'd cost more to reproduce and to sell, and in their original format may be not as popular being very tall and prone to debris and liquid ingress.

      I agree though that they feel better than the F, and the prices for them on the rare occasion that they come up for sale have been quite ludicrous. Plus there's been a replacement controller for some (but not all) models, which allows direct usage via USB, which drove up the demand even further.

      I have a few myself, but they are basically for collection and documentation purposes, as using such a behemoth for daily typing is not very practical, though it's not just due to the height, but rather the physical layout being difficult to use compared to modern ANSI. At least with most Model Fs (AT, 122 in particular) they can be converted to ANSI.

  21. Clackity Clack by mlookaba · · Score: 1

    I love the tactile feedback of a great mechanical keyboard. At home and at work, when I'm typing, people know it. My poor office mate wears headphones most of the time, but he tells me "I can tell when you're inspired, because the noise level goes up significantly".

  22. M and F tactile difference? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Anybody know if there's any kind of tactical feel/sound difference between the M and the F? I don't remember, specifically.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:M and F tactile difference? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      I read the F is lighter, even though it is louder.

  23. retro-Hipster-Fad by williamyf · · Score: 2

    I used a Model F early in my career (@ 16 and 17 YO), then I moved to a Model M.

    Almost no difference.

    This is a pure retro/hipster/fad thing.

    Get a good modern Keyboard, where you get a good backlight, lightweight, and good mechanical (for your taste) key feedback, with modern set of keys and macro-recording, and you will be much better served than reliving the days of yore...

    my 2 cents YMMV

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:retro-Hipster-Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its not a retro hipster fad. The idea originated in the keyboard/enthusiast collector community which arose when manufactures when to cheap rubber dome of membrane to save costs on commodity computers in the early 2000;s. Collectors of anything only make sense to others that collect the same thing. There has been a recent resurgence of interest in "mechanical":keyboard driven by the gaming community, but there is one slight crossover between the new mechanical "fad" and the older ethusiast/collector communities.

    2. Re:retro-Hipster-Fad by williamyf · · Score: 2

      The idea originated in the keyboard/enthusiast collector community which arose when manufactures when to cheap rubber dome of membrane to save costs on commodity computers in the early 2000;s. Collectors of anything only make sense to others that collect the same thing.

      I have two model-m keyboards myself. Even flew one of them from Venezuela to spain (in my lugagge, where every pound counted) during my MBA in 2006. I used it consistently at work AND at home (that's why I've got two) from 1992 until 2009, when I got my first Mac and needed the Command-Key.

      So no worries, I understand collecting keyborads, and I unstestand mechanical feel, as I also hate rubber/membrane/dome type keyboards. And I'll also say that the clacking of the keys helps me concentrate...

      But this is 2017. Get your cherry-mx switch type keyboards with modern layout, macro-recording, back-light and all the bells and whistles...

      Or, if push comes to shove, a model M from omnicomp, mechanicaly equivalent to a model M (even made with the same tooling), but with USB, Extra Windows Key and a nipple mouse!

      But, at this point (2017) rehashing/remaking the model F from scratch? That's just retro/hipster/fad

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    3. Re:retro-Hipster-Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up my Model Ms long ago in favour of Apple aluminum keyboards.

    4. Re: retro-Hipster-Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second this. Logitech makes some fantastic boards you can pick up for $60.

      âoeIn the day,â Fujitsu had a competing product - slightly less slam-clicky, but better for it. As long as we're all dropping in our two cents.

    5. Re:retro-Hipster-Fad by guises · · Score: 1

      Been using a Model M for a long time, for some reason I've never heard of the F until now. Maybe the feel is slightly different, maybe it isn't, as long as it's close I don't care about that. What I do care about is the N-key rollover. If you've ever done much gaming on a Model M, you have experienced this problem. An M-like keyboard with N-key rollover would be a godsend.

      That said, it's the M15 that's the real prize. I wonder if this guy could be talked into doing F-style internals with an M15-style ergonomic form-factor.

    6. Re:retro-Hipster-Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, the extra windows keys (aka, the spacebar thief, aka the shit that makes it impossible to find the alt and control keys by touch) are NOT features. cherry might have nice switches but all they have is 104 key garbage layouts.

      also what the hell do i need macros, USB, a nipple mouse or backlights for? geesh.

    7. Re:retro-Hipster-Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, help me out: Why the fuck would a keyboard need a backlight?

    8. Re:retro-Hipster-Fad by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      Put the F keys on the left where God intended them to be! Can't use my Wordperfect keyboard template with the F keys on top.

  24. Yep. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I had one with my IBM PC-1. When I upgraded it to a 6MHz AT clone, and I had to use an AT keyboard, I thought I'd open it up and see why it sounded so interesting. Too bad, because I used to use it with my GRiDPad 1910, which a friend hacked a full size XT keyboard connector into for me.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  25. I say this in every keyboard thread by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    but I'd kill for the Microsoft natural layout with clicky keys. I've tried those split keyboards but they don't slant the keys at an angle so they're a mess.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I say this in every keyboard thread by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      This guy posted a nice little tenting system made out of craft foam sheets:
      https://www.reddit.com/r/Mecha...
      http://imgur.com/a/7hhgx

      I ended up designing one like it for my own split keyboard. Works great, feels great. Just don't spill soda on it.

      I'm also a fan of the Microsoft Natural layout. I got one back in 1994 that lasted for 15 years before the keys began malfunctioning, and I had to throw it out, sadly.

    2. Re:I say this in every keyboard thread by guises · · Score: 1

      You're talking about a Model M15. And yes, you're not the only one who would like one of those. You can try ebay, but expect to pay $800+ - they are rare and highly sought after.

      If this guy would do the F internals with the M15 form factor, I'd be completely sold.

    3. Re:I say this in every keyboard thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logitech Wave (wired, not that wireless crap). It's like a the MS Natural, but without the massive gap in the middle and the annoying need to point your elbows at the screen.

  26. Re:Ahh, typewriters by shoor · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I learned to type on mechanical typewriters. I had a clerical rating in the Navy and, during my training days, we'd spend an hour a day in a room full of old, beat up Underwoods, practicing. I remember one of my early jobs as a computer programmer, I would be working at a computer keyboard in an office cubicle with the 5 foot dividers, and people on the other side of the room could hear me pounding away.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  27. A fool and his money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA: F62, F77 base keyboard without keys: $325

    $325 and no keys?

    ROFLMAO

  28. Re:If I'm spending that kind of money on a keyboar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unicomp sells keyboard condoms for their Model M clones, but I wasn't terribly impressed. Didn't fit perfectly, and it would easily lift up if you lightly dragged your fingers across the keys. I still like and use the keyboard, but I threw out the cover after a few weeks.

  29. Cherry MX Blues are good enough for me by movdqa · · Score: 1

    I love the clicky keys and I've used the old IBM PC keyboards in the past. They are nice but I think that the old heavyweights are a little too much.

  30. i used to love mine when i was kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but now that i got used to flat Apple keyboards, the thought of going back to one of those big clunky fuax typewriter keyboards just seems shitty. there is no need to have the keys be 3/4 of an inch thick other than to give you carpel tunnel syndrome as you cock your wrist up trying to get on top of the keys.

    1. Re:i used to love mine when i was kid by mark-t · · Score: 1

      there is no need to have the keys be 3/4 of an inch thick other than to give you carpel tunnel syndrome as you cock your wrist up trying to get on top of the keys.

      That's only issue if you did not try to rest the base of your palms on the bottom of the keyboard while typing. Like playing a piano, to prevent injury, it is best to not rest your hands upon anything, keeping your hands always raised fully above the keys. This is just part of good keyboarding posture, and you should *NEVER* need to flex their wrist back while typing. If you find that you are, then you are doing it incorrectly, and are only setting yourself up for a world of eventual pain if you persist in doing it that way. Good posture can feel more tiring when you are not used to it, but it's well worth the effort of building up your endurance

  31. Re: Northgate by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Remember reading John C. Dvorak, the Jim Sterling of his day rave about them.

  32. Evil Popular Mechanics site. by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    I'm not ever going to see anything at popularmechanics.com, because they pop a "We refuse to show you a damn thing because you are blocking ads" page.

    Lies. I do not block ads.

    I block scripts.

    I'll see every ad you feel like blasting at me If. They. Are. Not. Scripts.

    But I'm not allowing every random malware creator on the planet who buys an ad slot on some random ad server to infect my PC. Period.

    popularmechanics.com is dead to me.

  33. Keycap printing by fnj · · Score: 2

    Dye sublimation is better than just simple-minded surface printing (which is utterly unacceptable), but double-shot injection molding is preferred. Too bad they did not make the right choice. Big black mark.

    1. Re:Keycap printing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because they're using PBT, not ABS, for the keycaps - harder to mould, double-shot was probably too much to ask.

      CAPTCHA: bankrupt

    2. Re:Keycap printing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they are using dye-sublimation for the keys. It would be pretty shitty if they cheaped out and used laser or pad printing for the keys...

      https://www.modelfkeyboards.com/questions/question/what-quality-can-be-expected-for-keycaps/#answers

  34. Don't miss those keyboards really by halsathome · · Score: 1

    If I remember my dads old IBM PC XT keyboard right, it must have been the model M. Key-travel too far and springs too hard for my taste. Nice bounce and the metal feel was great though. Don't need the sound but the feel of the snap when the key goes in was good. I would not think you could get shorter key travel with the model M technology, so I' can't say I miss those. That might be me trying to justify shipping the rig to recycling twenty years ago ...

  35. I still don't see the appeal of them, personally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see why people love them, but they just aren't for me.
    I hate my already sorta-noisy membrane-board now, why would I want more noise on top of that?
    I can remember the noise from those keyboards. I can remember typewriters. I want to unremember. Giving me PTSD man.

    People always go on about N-key rollover being so good on keyboards, but I have never had any issues with weird key combinations or even standard key combinations not working because a lack of it.
    Hell, I use Capslock AND Insert as a hotkey prefix. Numlock too, actually. Even Alt-gr. (but that doesn't count, "it is one"!)
    I also regularly played games with no issues. If anything, it was a crappy mouse that tended to fail more often. Why the hell does every mouse fail so hard with the middle click button? They are so pathetically designed. I've lost count of how many of those damn things I've been through, yet I'm still on this keyboard nearly 15 years later. A DELL keyboard!
    The only time I have ever seen any problems with a lack of proper key rollover is the esoteric "hold both shifts and type this sentence" meme to test out what keys fail.
    Admittedly this sorta bummed me out years back because I wanted to make a funky hotkey that required both shift keys to be held down and T, T was one of those that never worked on my keyboard. No major loss.

    Hope it goes well for them. That's a lotta money.

  36. Re: Northgate by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

    So, would that be him writing about "Dvorak's keyboard"?

  37. That layout is atrocious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saying. I DO have doubts that the Model F mechanical design is significantly superior to the Model M (seems like splitting hairs to be honest), but I can overlook that, after all we're all entitled to an opinion.

    But no function keys and a compressed or absent right-hand cluster? For >$300? Yikes.

  38. I remember these grossly stained keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was too young to have access to new ones. Just disgusting looking ones at school!

  39. Model F keyboard by fredex · · Score: 1

    But none of the proposed layouts have the F-keys. doesn't anyone other than me think that's a non-feature?

  40. Does anyone else remember IBM's... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't remember the one in the top photo (though I've used pretty similar ones, just not IBM).

    But I used the one the baby is typing on, the one with 10 function keys to the left. Excellent hardware back then. Plus function keys at the left are easier to use.

  41. For the price, include a USB hub. by willy_me · · Score: 1

    The ability to plug in a USB drive or USB wireless transceiver for a mouse is very convenient. I would have added $10 to the price and added a couple of USB ports on the side / back of the keyboard.

  42. Even the keyboards have gone tactical! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nomsg

  43. Happy to see people care for keyboards by dindi · · Score: 1

    I am typing on a Kinesis Advantage. I have too. My favourite started to fail. Keypresssss reeeepeeeats and other issues. So I went ahead and un-soldered all the brown stem MX keys and replaced them by blue stem MX keys.

    Now they click.

    I also built an Ergodox with blue ckickies. Which is a nice project. Thru hole and SMD practice.

    Which brings me to my point: clickies are cool. Heavy keyboards are cool. Slim, compact keyboards are cool.

    But if you are typing on the staggered design that was designed to a 150cm tall woman, then you are ... I am tempted to say: doing it wrong, but I won't.

    Getting used to a Kinesis Advantage is a royal giant pain in the butt. It literally hurts your brain. Typing stuff (text) is kind of OK, but writing code makes you want to kill yourself. For a week or so. ... then the magic happens, and you realise, that nothing can touch it. Replaceable switches. Curved key-wells. Programmable.

    When people ask me how I spend $300 on a keyboard, $100 on keys, then hours and hours in labour to replace the keys. I always ask them how they spend $30.000+ for a car they use less than 8 hours a WEEK. I am using this 10-12 hours a day.

    BTW, I went through $100 Apple keyboards, 1-2 a year. Un-repairable.

    Anyway. While I find the Type M, and Type F really-really cool. Using it as a keyboard is less particular than having a 1950 car as a daily commute.

    But ... again. 99% of my friends type on conventional keyboards, so probably I am the odd minority here...

    1. Re:Happy to see people care for keyboards by dindi · · Score: 1

      I have too = I have two :) ...lol ...hundreds wasted on keyboards and I cannot type :O

  44. For that price... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    For that price, I want a keyboard with the control key in the correct location!

  45. Only choice for communicating with Colossus by Babel-17 · · Score: 1
  46. I would choose the DEC LK-250 instead by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    Back in the late 1970's, I learned to type on a manual typewriter. As a result, I developed a heavy typing touch, which served me well with 1980's keyboards like the VT-100 terminal. A few years later, we had VT220 terminals with LK-201 keyboards. Every key was in the right place, but the key action was lighter and I wore out them out periodically. Today, my typing touch is considerably lighter. The LK-250 is the PC (ancient DIN connector) version of the LK-201, with the alt key replacing the compose key. IMHO, we reached the epitome of keyboard design back in the 1990's, with honorable mention to Apple for their keyboard designs of 2008-2015.

  47. Re:Money.. by scsirob · · Score: 1

    Quite simple really.. The Model F have a market today, you can sell them to enthousiasts who used to own one.

    Owners of the Model M on the other hand are still enjoying their original product every day and have no reason to buy anything else today.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  48. Re:If I'm spending that kind of money on a keyboar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they don't make them because keyboards are a lot cheaper to buy now. they were about $100 in the era of the Model M and Northgate keyboards, so that's about $200 now. they are about 20x cheaper now, unless it's an Apple one.

  49. Marketing contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the web page:

    "The IBM Model F keyboards not only used the best switches, the materials used in their production (well over 5lbs of steel and other metals) means they will be working as good as new when it's time to pass it on to your grandchildren."

    surprisingly, the indestructible keyboard did not resist for 30 years:

    "The problem... they just aren't made that way any more. The IBM Model F was discontinued in the 1980's. If you do find a Model F, it will be some combination of dirty, broken and/or expensive, requiring hours of work to get it working again!"

    There is a serious contradiction here.

  50. Re:If I'm spending that kind of money on a keyboar by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    And thank god. Because while the idea of those were that they were washable, the reality was most people used them to avoid ever having to wash anything.

    Condom is a wrong comparison. I remember when seeing those keyboards "used condom" is more what came to mind.

    Eww.

  51. IBM or HHKB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had lots of keyboards, but nothing compares to a real IBM F or HHKB Professional 2. There are the way to go, if you care about the feel of your keyboard. The HHKB Pro2 BlueTooth version is just becoming available. I've not bought one yet:

    http://www.pfu.fujitsu.com/hhkeyboard/bt/

    The price is about the same as this IBM clone.

  52. Keyboard E's had a more satisfying click. by Grumpinuts · · Score: 1

    We used to make IBM keyboards at their plant in Greenock. Keyboard E's were used for 3270/3279 terminals and had the highest spring force and the most satisfying click known to man. No keyboard since has come anywhere close.

  53. Modern layouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I'd REALLY like, is today's 101,103,104,105-key layouts, as Unicomp is currently selling, but built like a Model F.

    With swappable cables, available in a variety of lengths, with and without coiling, for easy switching between PS/2 and USB.

    With the Control key high on my left pinky, where the heathens put the Tab key these days, as $deity intended it.

    You know... what IBM should have done in the first place.

    Oh... and a fucking hardware Escape key. I'd spring the $700 for one of these beasts, except for that. Vim, anyone? But at lest this one doesn't reprogram itself to some other purpose based on OS events, like the laptop the buckling-spring keyboard is supposed to rescue me from...

  54. a nostalgia too far by epine · · Score: 1

    I got rid of one from my junk closet not long ago.

    The blasted thing capped my burst typing speed to about 90 wpm, by which point it kind of feels like running on wet sand—the wet sand of some strange Pop Rock planet.

    I was mainly using to install obscure distributions on old beater boxes.

    I'm presently typing on a Compaq 247429-101 Erase-Ease keyboard (though I never use the left thumb backspace key).

    This thing has been a total workhorse and it has a brilliantly long PS/2 cable.

    Every year or so it begins to look like Lister's revenge and I have to pop all 100 keys and scrub every damn side of every damn key cover from the curry crossing (the giant steaming bowl of tan goodness typically perched on the edge of my glass desk, three inches above and six inches behind home position; just like my typing, a minor embolism every 99 spoonfuls or thereabouts—I could really use a special backspace key for this other problem.)

  55. Unicomp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unicomp never stopped selling these kind of keyboards. They made the original ones for IBM.

  56. Love that keyset by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    I've been developing software since 1981 and those keyboards had the best tactile feel whose layout somehow results in less typos. I've used some keyboards that were so bad that they caused RSI.

    Both of my Windows tower computers at home have a IBM model F Keyboard with the function keys across the top. The oldest one has been holding up since 1993.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  57. HP keyboards by NorthWay · · Score: 1

    IBM burglar killers? Bah.
    Give me the HP PA-RISC Workstation (50/99MHz) keyboard any day. Took a bit of getting used to, but suddenly all others felt wrong. (I've seen similar later, but they had hard plastic keys and not the soft rubber ones of the original.)

    (Anyone know some place that sells them?)

  58. I don't get it. by sabbede · · Score: 1
    What's the appeal of noisy keyboards? I hate all that clicking and clacking. I have a rather fancy gaming keyboard I hardly use because the noise is so irritating it seriously detracts from my gaming. I have to wear headphones so the sounds of the game aren't overwhelmed by the keys.

    Quiet keys are one of the best things to ever happen to keyboards. And yes, I am old enough to have grown up with noisy keyboards and typewriters. I hated them, and I loved it when keys got quiet.

  59. Not new by Tighe_L · · Score: 1

    Unicomp has been making them for YEARS! https://www.pckeyboard.com/