Lauri Love Ruling 'Sets Precedent' For Trying Hacking Suspects in UK (theguardian.com)
A high court ruling blocking extradition to the US of Lauri Love, a student accused of breaking into US government websites, has been welcomed by lawyers and human rights groups as a precedent for trying hacking suspects in the UK in future. From a report: The decision delivered by the lord chief justice, Lord Burnett of Maldon, is highly critical of the conditions Love would have endured in US jails, warning of the risk of suicide. Lawyers for the 33-year-old, who lives in Suffolk, had argued that Love should be tried in Britain for allegedly hacking into US government websites and that he would be at risk of killing himself if sent to the US. There was cheering and applause in court on Monday when Burnett announced his decision. He asked supporters to be quiet, saying: "This is a court, not a theatre." In his judgment, Burnett said: "It would not be oppressive to prosecute Mr Love in England for the offences alleged against him. Far from it. Much of Mr Love's argument was based on the contention that this is indeed where he should be prosecuted
The 83A of the Extradition Act 20013. It allows judges to block extradition to the US and other countries if a crime was committed in the UK and if it is in the accused's interests to stand trial in the UK. Src: wired [0]
If her nickname was 'Butt' ...
Lauri "Butt: Love....
LUALZ DENG!!
Pardon my ignorance on law but if he committed the crime in the UK then why try and extridite him in the first place? I thought extradition was only if you committed a crime in a country and then left by the time they wanted to prosecute you.
As a citizen I am scared to be in America at the moment. The current leadership hard line approach to nearly everything with little to no thinking of any ethical ramification. With laws (such as the recent Tax bill) designed to punish states who didn't vote for the current leadership majority.
At this moment having a foreigner tried in American Court isn't the best place for justice. I currently have more faith in a fare trial in the UK.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/02/outspoken-nazi-arthur-jones-set-to-win-gop-nomination-for-congressional-seat-in-illinois.html
Before blowing that off as outlandish, Sweden is known for keeping suspects incommunicado for weeks without even charging them, and then deporting them to other countries to face other charges. Obama had Chelsea Manning tortured with solitary confident for months - yes it's torture and it causes permanent damage after a couple weeks - and she eventually attempted suicide.
"Set to win" is pretty slanted reporting. He has no opponents in the primary, because the seat is unwinnable by actual Republicans. It does make me wonder if the Republicans can't just kick him off their party, however- I'm honestly not sure if they can.
...not have the same reputation for rape and "inmate justice" that the US prisons have?
... they're still trying for an ill-defined crime, that you might as well describe as "making like a bogeyman on teh cybar". What's it mean? No matter. Just convict for great precedent!
Of course they could kick him out of the party. Of course they can begin to attempt to keep nazis out of their party IF THEY WANTED TO. But since they're nazi faggot traitors first and Americans second, they will not.
Just saying, if Russians like Trump can hack the fed, is it a crime if some schoolkid in the UK does it?
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
This judge is a troll and fabricating a caricature of the US.
I seem to recall other, similar extradition requests - Gary McKinnon for one, but several others.
What makes this one special?
I seem to recall that Gary also had Asperger's and Depression... which doesn't seem to make this one a precedent at all.
-- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
A Boy Named Lauri.
In the past, physical presence was needed to commit a crime (e.g. robbery). This had the natural result of criminals being caught in the jurisdiction in which they committed the crime. Extradition was only needed for criminals who fled the country after the crime.
The Internet changes all that. Now it's possible to reside in one jurisdiction (country), while committing a crime in another. The legal system is just coming to grips with this. c.f. the U.S. trying to get Microsoft's server data that's stored outside the country, France trying to apply its laws to the rest of the world, Kim Dotcom arrested in New Zealand at the behest of the U.S., etc.
Extradition agreements weren't really set up for suspects who fled to another country, not for this type of remote crime. So from this point on we'll be making up new stuff as we go along. It'll probably be a few more decades before it all gets settled down. If multiple judges rule as this judge has (and the same happens when some American kid hacks UK computers), I expect the U.S. and UK will negotiate new extradition treaties which specifically cover this type of case, thereby limiting the leeway the judge had in this particular case.
USG tortured Chelsea Manning - who eventually attempted suicide - with months of solitary confinement.
It has bothered me for a long time that the USA can just ask "Give us that guy" and countries bow down and hand "that guy" over.
Jees, I would hope that any country I am a citizen of stands up for my rights. As laid down by my country of citizenship. Not just blindly handing me over to some other jurisdiction on their whim.
The Dot Com case was/is the worst example of this. There are many others.
Bugger off USA. If your government websites are so easy to break, fix them!
Someone get Tom Cruse on the line! I think we have the script for the next Mission: Impossible movie.
Also thinking The Transporter 4: The Really, Super Long Haul.
Picked the wrong option. Should be interesting to see the results.
That name really threw me for a loop. My first thought was "What the fuck does some porn chick have to do with hacking?"
Seriously, that is one FUCKED UP name for a dude. He probably learned to fight really well from a young age out of necessity.
Britain will regret this decision. At some point in time a criminal wanted in Britain will be in the US and Trump will prevent the extradition. Tit-for-tat....
Caution: Contents under pressure
good we don't need yet another illegal immegrant
When the MoD wanted to hear from two apache pilots who were involved in a "friendly fire" incident", not even wanted for facing charges, just to say what happened in their words, the USA refused. A US squaddie committed a crime in Germany, fled back to the base, and got sent back to the USA and the DoD have refused to let him be extradited to face trial. So waht the fuck are you whining about this biting us in the arse? You did this shit first, asshole.