Slashdot Mirror


Impossible Burgers' Key, Bloody Ingredient Wins FDA Approval (cnbc.com)

The FDA has approved the key ingredient used in the vegetarian-friendly Impossible Burger. "The ingredient, soy leghemoglobin, releases a protein called heme that gives the meat substitute its distinctive blood-like color and taste," reports CNBC. The burger comes from a company aptly named Impossible Foods, which started raising millions of dollars in 2015 to pursue a plant-based burger that truly tastes like meat. From the report: In a letter to Impossible Foods released Monday, the FDA deemed soy leghemoglobin GRAS, or generally recognized as safe, in its most recent review. "Getting a no-questions letter goes above and beyond our strict compliance to all federal food-safety regulations," Impossible Foods founder and CEO Patrick O. Brown said in a statement. "We have prioritized safety and transparency from day one, and they will always be core elements of our company culture."

289 of 445 comments (clear)

  1. As a vegetarian since 15 years... by carlhaagen · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...I can't say that I've ever missed that specific meat-like taste (even less so the color) in any of the many meat facsimiles I've tried. I suppose the reason why one becomes a vegetarian plays a big role in this.

    1. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone trying to eat more vegetarian for health and environmental reasons, i'd appreciate it. Personally I eat vegetarian most days of the week, but still love e.g. steaks, burgers, and sushi, and still eat meat on Saturdays as a treat.

    2. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by ET3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that such products are aimed more at meat eaters than long time vegetarians. I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered, so offering something which tastes the same (and has similar or better nutritional values and isn't more expensive) would allow them to switch out of eating meat.

    3. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered

      Speak for yourself. I eat meat exclusively so I can contribute to controlling the population of delicious animals.

      If you just leave them be, they'll roam around eating all the plants until there aren't any left. Meanwhile carnivorous animals will have a near-endless food source readily available and undefended by humans, which will cause their population to grow exponentially. Soon we'll have to start hunting these dangerous animals lest they decide beef is too common and would much prefer some long pig for lunch. Then we'll end up with a pile of lion corpses that nobody wants, which will attract a shitload of pesky insects, potentially the sort that carry diseases, which will spread far and wide, spreading the next plague. Humanity will be wiped out in a matter of months, all because some people refused to eat their steaks.

      Vegetarianism is just terrorism playing the long game.

    4. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by mukinrestak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, all the substitutes that are made to mimic meat well are currently far pricier than actual meat. I tried a sample of a Beyond Burger a while back and it was pretty good, but on the shelf it was like 4 times the price of actual ground beef. That ain't gonna work too well. A plant based burger should cost LESS than the real thing.

    5. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Because right now the Impossible is an early adopter product. As usage spreads, it will get cheaper.

      The market for this is not vegans, because they are religiously opposed to engineered plants. It's for vegetarians and anyone who wants to reduce his part of the "carnal footprint" made by cattle farming. As time goes on, it will become a low-cost substitute for ground beef.

    6. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this is going to be a wanna-be vegetarian's version of a gateway drug. :D

      Oh, and sidenote...I'm tired of vegans who gloat about being able to eat Oreos.

      "Excuse me, how does this help your cause even one bit?"

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    7. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm ever so slowly trying to do the same thing. I make this vegetarian roast that's a great meat substitute. And have continually tried to tweet it so it's more like meat. But nothing matches the sheer audacity of eating fast food every so often.

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    8. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by dcw3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you tweet your meat in public?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    9. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      As someone trying to eat more vegetarian for health and environmental reasons, i'd appreciate it. Personally I eat vegetarian most days of the week, but still love e.g. steaks, burgers, and sushi, and still eat meat on Saturdays as a treat.

      Only eating meat on Sundays is almost 100% of the reduction that's actually needed in the world.

      In-between? There's so many genuinely tasty vegetable dishes it's untrue. I don't know why people insist on so much meat.

      (Yeah, we know, you can have those as a side-dish to accompany your dead animals - win-win, right? FFS)

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that such products are aimed more at meat eaters than long time vegetarians. I'd say that most meat eaters do it because they like the taste rather than because they want animals slaughtered

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I came to post the same thing. I find it fascinating that so many people fail to understand that there are many people who don't like the TASTE or even the SMELL of meat, not just the concept. I won't eat "fake" meat anymore than real meat. I am not trying to "save the earth" or "purify my soul" or such nonsense.

    12. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age."

      Sorry, but your theory is wrong. I was not raised a vegetarian and agree with the OP. Now if you said for SOME people it depends on how they were raised, I would agree with you.

    13. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's just awesome for you. Unfortunately there are people who do like the smell and taste of meat. And their only chance to get this so far was to raise and kill an animal for that meat. Now, unless they really like the idea of killing an animal for meat and that's their reason to eat meat, this is a great alternative for them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Salgak1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I grew up on a farm. Doesn't bother me one bit. In fact, I've slaughtered pigs that I later helped eat. And have hunted deer, and ate them as well. You do not want deer eating up your entire truck garden. . .

    15. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I think hunting it yourself must make it taste better otherwise no one would eat venison.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 1

      *nod* it all comes down to personal taste and a variety of options.

    17. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      Tastes change. When I was young I used to love shrimp, can't stand seafood now. Same for things like chocolate milk. When I was in college I started really liking onion.

      Although, my sister-in-law is vegetarian and her 4 year old girls will regularly pass up pizza for salad. I've joked that I've been tempted to Family and Child Services several times.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    18. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it is really difficult to compete with the subsidies and other indirect economic incentives the cattle industry depends on.

    19. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Very few vegans I have met care about engineers plants one way or the other. They mostly just want to reduce animal suffering. I've even known plenty of vegans that are even in favor of things like the vat-grown meat people have been working on.

    20. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think in general, people who grow up with frequent contact with slaughtering do not mind it, but people who only encounter it a few times but it is otherwise not a part of their world have trouble with it.

      It is kinda like, for lack of a better comparison, slavery. People who grow up around slave labor see it as normal, and people who are insulated but benefit from it see it as too abstract but useful to worry, but people who live in countries that do not have it but travel to one that does and witness it tend to come out more strongly against it.

    21. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by dbialac · · Score: 1

      As a non-vegetarian, I don't see the point in eating imitation foods. I can, however, see the need for developing ways to grow real meat without the need to farm animals as we venture out into space, as carrying 10 cows in a rocket isn't exactly practical.

    22. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Everyone has different dietary needs and requirements, as everyone processes nutrients a little differently. I always find it funny with how much passion people put behind other peoples diets.

      Some people are good with processing vegetable protein, and their nutritional needs crave the taste that vegetable provide.
      Other people have a harder time processing vegetable protein, and craves meat to cover the nutritional need.
      That said, we have too much food in general, so for those who crave meat, will actually eat too much of it. And just because something is vegetarian it doesn't make it healthy either.

      Meat isn't a sustainable model for general production, and if vegetarian meals can help cover the meat cravings with a vegetable substitute. Even if our bodies take longer to process the protein normally it will be enough to sustain a person as we are still a creature of excess.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    23. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by HxBro · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this is going to be a wanna-be vegetarian's version of a gateway drug. :D

      Bacon is the only gateway drug

    24. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then they have a bad business plan. I've spoken with a lot of other omnivores, usually in the context of mocking vegans behind their backs, and I've not many anyone yet who'd switch to fake meat, no matter how it looks, smells or tastes. Sure, in the company of a vegan, we might say things to be polite, we might even try some of that vegan crap, but it's really just so we don't hurt your feelings.

      Perhaps you can't fathom how someone could just be so uncaring about animals, so you imagine that we're not all evil, that we're just addicted to the taste. Fact is, we don't have any problem with our position within the animal kingdom, with the slaughter of animals, or anything like that. We think it's natural, and we'll continue to enjoy meat long after businesses like this collapse upon the realisation that their target market never existed in the first place.

    25. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by atrex · · Score: 1

      Assuming lab burgers don't beat them to it. Technically if all the "vegetarian" is worried about is animal slaughter then a lab burger would be the perfect substitute - assuming the economics of scale can bring the price down from $400 a burger.

      I would which would have less of a carbon footprint, mass market lab burgers or mass market plant burgers?

    26. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "(not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)"

      Maybe yes and maybe no. Once upon a time meat didn't come all nicely packaged from the supermarket. You or some one you knew went out and killed an animal and dragged its still bleeding body back home to be skinned and then cooked.

      I also doubt many of the 4-H (and like program) kids that raise animals for slaughter become vegetarians or vegans as these programs wouldn't last very long if that were the case.

      Then again, people are kept so distant from their food production nowadays that all of a sudden seeing an animal slaughtered after a lifetime of getting ones meat wrapped in plastic might shock a lot of people into not eating meat.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    27. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In Japan they eat battered, fried fish with the tail intact. Shrimp as well. It's called tempura.

      I didn't realize how conditioned I was to only eating meat that doesn't look like the thing that it came from. I can now just about manage tempura, but not whole shrimp. Anything with a face... Ugh, no.

      Makes no sense, it's just one of those ingrained norms I can't get past.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I don't care about raising and killing, I worry about the cost. Essentially the energy wasted to raise an animal that you then only get to use a fraction of hurts my capitalist heart when you could get the same from some dirt cheap soy with a bit of flavoring.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are what you eat, fat pig.

    30. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by houghi · · Score: 1, Funny

      I do that as well and am discriminated against my way of life if I go to a vegetarian restaurant. I went to a steak house with a vegetarian friend and he was able to get something he liked. I went with him to a vegetarian one and I went out drunk, because I could eat nothing.

      And as an aside, to me meat is basicaly processed vegetables. Some people like their vegetables cooked and then put on a plate. I just add an extra layer of seasoning.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    31. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Iwastheone · · Score: 1

      My earliest memory at 3 years old is of my grandmother chopping the head off a chicken on a tree stump and watching it run around with blood spurting from its neck. I assume we ate chicken that night.

    32. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by arth1 · · Score: 2

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      True. Exposure reduces, while mystery reinforces aversions.
      Growing up next to a farm, I understood the end of life (and helped start of life), and growing up fishing with my father and having to slay my own catch has undoubtedly made it easier for me to eat fish.

      All schools should have farm and abattoir field days, in my opinion. Taking life and eating the bodies is something our species does, and is knowledge passed on since we left the jungle for the steppes.

    33. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 2

      They mostly just want to reduce animal suffering.

      For pretty much all the meat in the supermarket, the alternative to slaughter is never being born. Not many pet cows. Maybe these animal lovers think nonexistence is preferable to the lives these animals are offered, but those are the current alternatives. Bred for food or not bred at all. Trying to improve these animals' conditions is noble.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    34. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I certainly hope no one eats meat specifically because they want more animals to be slaughtered. We eat meat because we like the taste (and texture and other properties). If that can be replicated in a reasonable way using a vegetarian method instead, I'm 100% for that and certainly wouldn't mind ordering it regularly.

      Minced meat like hamburgers is a good first effort to tackle, because it's much easier than replicating all the features of a steak. Make vegetarian lasagna or bolognese with currently available stuff like quorn or Naturli' or something, and I bet most people wouldn't notice. Burger patties are a bit more complicated, but Impossible Foods seem to have it handled pretty well.

      Replicating roast beef or ribeye or a pork chop is going to be more complicated, but it's an interesting problem to tackle.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    35. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Nobody said "all".

      --
      No sig today...
    36. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is kinda like, for lack of a better comparison, slavery.

      I think that's quite a good comparison.

      Being accustomed something doesn't make it natural or good.

      --
      No sig today...
    37. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is kinda like, for lack of a better comparison, slavery.

      It's like changing your own oil. People who grow up around their parents doing oil changes see them as normal, and people who are insulated but benefit from it see it as too alien. In general, people who grow up with frequent contact with home oil changes do not mind them. For people for who only encounter them a few times, it is otherwise not a part of their world and they have trouble with it.

      I can think of a couple of acceptable car analogies.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    38. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time meat didn't come all nicely packaged from the supermarket.

      Once upon a time killing your livestock was only for special occasions or when there was no other food left.

      --
      No sig today...
    39. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      I didn't realize how conditioned I was to only eating meat that doesn't look like the thing that it came from.

      Speak for yourself. When I go out for a steak I demand that they bring me the head of the cow it came from so that I can stare into its cold, dead eyes and remind it who runs this planet.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    40. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jockeys · · Score: 1

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      Maybe, maybe not. I didn't start hunting until I was an adult; pursuing, killing, dressing, and cooking the animals I harvested made me appreciate them MORE, not LESS.

      I've also grown my own vegetables, and a similar thing applied. Maybe simply working for it makes it taste better.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    41. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Worse, when you read the fucking ingredients, they're full of inflammatory grains and legumes containing toxic anti-nutrients (phytins and lectins: plants' biodefenses). I relied on the delicious, metabolism-destroying "Standard Vegetarian Diet" for over twenty years before I learned that I needed to give up the grains, beans, eggs and dairy... and the improvements to my health have been truly profound (although the choices available to me as a 'carb-based paleo vegan' are usually limited to "fruit, fruit, kale or kimchee," the cravings for unhealthy shit are through the roof, my carcass clearly benefits so I try to stick to it).

    42. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Stonent1 · · Score: 2

      "Oh George, not the livestock...."

    43. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Once upon a time killing your livestock was only for special occasions or when there was no other food left.

      Umm, no.

      As an example, cows and bulls are born in about equal numbers. But you only need one bull for all your cows. So the extra bulls get slaughtered every year.

      Hell, the "one bull" gets slaughtered every few years since inbreeding is a bad thing. Once all the cows are his daughters, he's history.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    44. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      They do it depending upon why they became a vegetarian: if you quit eating meat because you were grossed out by it, you hardly want to be reminded of it let alone eat an actual deliberate imitation. However, if you still love or crave meat yet wish to avoid it for some other reason, these products have more appeal.

    45. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right back at ya, string bean.

    46. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Resulting in massive increases to the rates of pesticide use and fertilizer runoff that is killing waterways and oceans.

      As it turns out, trying to support billions of humans where 90% of them "hunt" their food in a supermarket or restaurant without having effects on the environment is hard.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    47. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All schools should have farm and abattoir field days, in my opinion. Taking life and eating the bodies is something our species does, and is knowledge passed on since we left the jungle for the steppes.

      I don't know if it would be fair or anything, but I'd love to see people have to get a meat license before they were allowed to eat any. Under some age you get a free pass, but after some reasonable age where the lesson can possibly sink in, kids and adults alike would have to either kill something, prepare it, and eat it, or tour a slaughterhouse. I've killed a couple of things and eaten 'em, and could have recorded evidence and used it on my meat license application :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    48. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other thought is that according to the "Least Harm Principle" a massive switch to vegan diet for society would result in far more deaths of small furry animals being run through harvester machinery than current deaths of large herbivores in slaughterhouses: https://www.morehouse.edu/facs...

      Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's? Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human, which would mean finding a balanced omnivorous diet.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    49. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Essentially the energy wasted to raise an animal that you then only get to use a fraction of

      People like to make a big deal about how ancient, "primitive" cultures used every part of an animal, but the fact is that we do the same. We don't landfill anything. The bones are ground up for bone meal, or burned to make pigment. The fats are used in other food products, or in cosmetics, or even converted into biodiesel. (Better to make green diesel, though, since it has a much lower gel point.) Even the hide and hair are rendered. Your imaginary food animals where only a small part of the animal is used do not exist.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      your problem is simply that you're clearly a fucking moron and likely an unreasonable and abrasive twat.

      Judging from your post, you'd certainly have expertise on that from personal experience.

    51. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's?

      Souls are distributed using a complicated algorithm that considers size, cuteness, flavor, and ability to act human. Humans get 1 full soul. Crickets get only a small fraction of a soul, making them fine to smash. Cows are much larger and cuter than crickets, but they're strongly penalized for being delicious and forfeit almost their entire soul. A bunny's life is actually worth MORE than a cow's based on cuteness and relative flavor. Dogs are a curious case in that American dogs have a larger portion of a soul than Korean dogs based on environment. It's not an entirely fair system, but it's what we've got.

      Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human...

      Start whaling?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    52. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not an option if you're a strict carnivore. Where are the SJW friends now to defend our carnivorous minority???

    53. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      I can see you've never had kids. Adult's tastes are incredibly different to children's. I was a super fussy eater, hated spinach, and couldn't stomach anything that came from the sea, not to mention the usual didn't eat my fruit and veg. Now ... well my weekend breakfast usually includes smoked salmon stacked on wilted fried spinach because it's frigging delicious.

      My young self wouldn't have ever considered it. Neither would my teenage self, or my university self for that matter.

    54. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      No, they do it because that's how they were raised. People's "tastes" form at a young age.

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      I was wondering why vegetarianism was rampant when we all lived on farms, and so rare now.

    55. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      In my head I was more referring to hunter / gatherers, some of which ate quite a lot of meat. I wasn't very clear in my post though.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    56. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      I would mod you... A lot of veggies are not eating meat for ethical reasons, not taste reasons. So for a lot of them this is a win. Personally I would eat a human without batting an eyelid, protein is fucking protein, I promise that you won't suffer for long before you become a substitute pork chop. Unless you resist, in which case some tenderising may be required.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    57. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      There, their, they're.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    58. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by hamburger+lady · · Score: 4, Funny

      i hope so. otherwise he canâ(TM)t have any pudding. how can you have any pudding if you donâ(TM)t tweet your meat?!

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    59. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Killing food isn't natural? Seriously? Nothing in nature kills to eat?

      GTFO with that bullshit. I swear, some people have their head so far up in the clouds they can't even see reality anymore.

    60. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the countryside, I saw plenty of animals being put down and slaughtered. Heck, I even poked at pig carcasses with a stick, for fun. I still eat meat, but I'm not a fanatic about it or anything.

      I think more people should learn and observe where their food comes from. Not just meat, I mean everything. Especially processed food. If they're OK with something, they can eat it. If they freak out, they're free to avoid that food in the future. But at least they've been informed.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    61. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Bravo "hamburger lady" for your comment, and article appropriate handle!

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    62. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      Seeing people trolled never gets old.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    63. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Soy and shitty grains are prime actors in the monumental health crisis inflicting humanity right now. Unfortunately we are not set up to feed people on a mass scale food that would prevent them from spending their entire retirement savings on health care.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    64. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Except as everyone here should know by now, producing food plants uses far fewer resources than producing food animals.

      "Pork, chicken, dairy and eggs are equivalent within a factor of two when it came to their environmental burdens, the authors determined. But beef requires far, far more resources than any of those other protein categories. The team calculated that beef requires 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer and 11 times more water compared to those other food sources. That adds up to about five times more greenhouse gas emissions.

      To further put these findings into perspective, the authors also ran the same calculations for several staple crops. All told, on a calorie-to-calorie basis, potatoes, wheat and rice require two to six time less resources to produce than pork, chicken, eggs or dairy."

    65. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human

      Well we could start with forcing America to stop fighting wars against everything, I reckon that would be a good place to start. A couple of Americans killed in 9/11 and when everyone wiped the shit out of their eyes America had illegally invaded three countries and killed MILLIONS of people. I know that in the USA "black lives matter" but seriously, how many black people were in the two towers?

      Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's?

      It's not, I would eat the bunny too. I have been involved in raising bunnies for eating, they are vicious horrible fucking creatures, they are fucking cannibals as well. Eat them all!

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    66. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      LMFAO

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    67. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Once, when I was visiting my GF's farm-bred family, they were talking about beheading chickens, and I informed them that my chickens came from the grocery store.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    68. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      some of which ate quite a lot of meat

      Not true for most
      When they killed something it had to either be preserved (usually with smoking or salting) or eaten, so there would be periods where there was a LOT of meat eaten during migrations etc. and long periods where mostly veggies were eaten. A lot would depend on tribe and location.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    69. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I've gone the other way. As a kid/teen, I'd eat anything that didn't move, and a few things that did. I'm a lot more picky now.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    70. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MaryannG · · Score: 1

      Pretty much my take as well. If the product tasted like meat, looked like meat but perhaps lacked the cholesterol and fat that can accompany meat products but still deliver protein, taste and texture...and do it for a similar price point...I can see how people might be enticed to go with this.

      But that's a lot of "ifs" to cover.

      --
      Social Media Handywoman at Texas Boys Balloo
    71. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by vlad30 · · Score: 1
      Read trough the comments and only thing missing is this lamb ad 2016 - warning vegans complained some say they were traumatised yes it was real ad and aired. for those not in Australia https://youtu.be/7i15OPuFvmA

      actually always look forward to the Meat and Livestock ads for Australia Day good chuckle material

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    72. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, farm animals wandered about the yards and fields and weren't bred entirely for yield or kept their entire lives in sheds in cages too small to turn around in, fed with hormones to make them grow faster and pumped with antibiotics to stop them getting sick in the cramped conditions.

      The treatment of animals as industrial commodities is offensive to many people.

    73. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      I grew up on a farm. Doesn't bother me one bit. In fact, I've slaughtered pigs that I later helped eat. And have hunted deer, and ate them as well. You do not want deer eating up your entire truck garden. . .

      Both my parents grew up on farms in a small country town. I helped hold sheep while my dad slit their throats. I remember harvesting a pig on the farm once, too. My family raised dozens of rabbits. They were mostly pets, but we harvested a few. My dad taught us boys how to humanely kill the rabbits and how to prepare them. It feels weird knowing you are eating Snowball. My dad used to hunt.

    74. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Not true for most
      When they killed something it had to either be preserved (usually with smoking or salting) or eaten, so there would be periods where there was a LOT of meat eaten during migrations etc. and long periods where mostly veggies were eaten. A lot would depend on tribe and location."

      So when I said "some of which ate quite a lot of meat." I was 100% correct then?

      Eskimos and the Souix are two groups who lived primarily off of meat just off the top of my head and that's all it takes for my statement to be correct.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    75. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, the magical golden age of animal rearing.

      "...weren't bred entirely for yield"

      Domesticated animals have been selectively bred since they were domesticated animals as that's how we got domesticated animals. These animals don't live in the wild naturally.

      "...kept their entire lives in sheds in cages too small to turn around in, fed with hormones to make them grow faster and pumped with antibiotics to stop them getting sick in the cramped conditions."

      Which is why it's great we have options in our grocery stores for animals that have not been raised as such.

      "The treatment of animals as industrial commodities is offensive to many people."

      Sadly the adoption rate for the above referenced ethically raised animal products isnt very high as indicated by what most grocery stores carry which means your "many" isn't very many.

      And that's not even getting into how animals used to be butchered. Nowadays it's typically a quick bolt to the head but if you look at traditional practices for killing animals, some of them are downright gruesome. Halal is the first example that comes to mind with animals being intentionally bled out by slitting their throats to kill them.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    76. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Well, no... those harvesters are already being run through the fields to produce feed for the animals that we eat. Cutting out those animals would reduce the quantity of plant matter that needs to be harvested, as we're cutting out the (inefficient) step of converting it to meat.

      That said, I'm still going to enjoy my 6oz steak along with all the other bits that go with it.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    77. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Eh, I grew up around doing oil changes... but the only time I do it myself is changing the oil on the little diesel on my boat. For my car? I'd rather just pay someone to do it, plus they can get the supplies cheaper than I can.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    78. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Venture out into space? Seriously? We are not going to do any significant space travel unless our conciousness is uploaded into a robot you dumb fuck.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    79. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Your post caused me to remember hipsters lapping up ground raw meat. Heard of a story where someone ate sushi and had octopus eggs sprout in their gums.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    80. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Halal is the first example that comes to mind with animals being intentionally bled out by slitting their throats to kill them.

      It might be gruesome, but done properly it's not especially inhumane. Slitting the throat cuts off the blood flow to the brain, rendering the animal unconscious in very short order.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    81. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      This year, during the local prawn season, I remarked that it's interesting that in western culture, pretty much the only food that most people handle live any more is seafood. (for reference, we killed our prawns by bathing them in a bottle of Chardonnay, before grilling them).

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    82. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      You know what does that much faster and with less suffering?

      A bolt to the head.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    83. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      (not seeing the slaughter also helps, I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

      Actually in my experience it's the other way around. People who grow up insulated from the real world and get all their food in the supermarket develop a fantasy version of reality where all animals live in peace and harmony, until a big bad human comes and starts killing them.

      The reality is quite different. The vast majority of animals are fated to be killed and eaten, usually while still alive. Outside of humans and the domesticated animals we protect, dying peacefully in your sleep of old age is extremely rare. People who hunt, fish, or grow up on a farm have had this shoved in their faces most of their lives. They know how the real world works, and have less qualms about killing animals for food. While non-religious vegetarians usually chose that lifestyle because they've been disconnected all their lives with how nature really works, and it comes as such a shock to them when they first find out that they can't bear the thought of participating in it.

      If I were a wild animal, I would much rather be killed by a human than by other wild animals. People at least have enough empathy to try to make the kill as swiftly and painlessly as possible.

    84. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by jythie · · Score: 1

      That does not make a whole lot of sense. Large herbivores and pretty inefficient, they take far more pounds of feed to produce than the equivalent calories that they eventually become. A vegan or vegetarian diet requires less farming than meat production. The linked piece is based off the increasingly rare practice of just letting animals out to forage, which makes for a nice nostalgic image but is not how modern ranching is done.

    85. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I'm fucking brilliant and an abrasive asshole; not trying to toot my own horn (I'm just as flawed and miserable as the next fuck, I suspect) but you may as well get it right if you're going to bother at all. ;)

    86. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, bolt to the head, throat slit with a sharp knife, bolt to the head, throat slit with a sharp knife?

      Do you know, I don't think I'd have a preference.

      I believe the bolt to the head is in any case followed by throat slit with a sharp knife

    87. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but I actually had a different context in mind when I answered the question, I apologize for my misunderstanding.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    88. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. I went primarily vegetarian for a few years, mainly for environmental reasons. I ended up going back to meat when I was working a job where the cafeteria on some days had no good vegetarian options. Now I still eat a lot of vegetarian meals and less meat than I used to. Mostly that ends up being dishes that don't imitate meat at all since fake meats usually fall very short of the mark. But I'm very open to fake meats that are tasty and meat free.

    89. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I don't care about raising and killing, I worry about the cost. Essentially the energy wasted to raise an animal that you then only get to use a fraction of hurts my capitalist heart when you could get the same from some dirt cheap soy with a bit of flavoring.

      Energy really isn't the issue. Most livestock lives off of stuff that humans can't eat and is easy to harvest. Ox and cow eat grass. Chickens eat seed and insects. Pigs eat trash. (Horses eat grain, but they are usually too important as work animals so we don't eat them.) We only feed them things like corn because there is a filthy amount of cheap corn. Even cheaper and less energy intensive than non-food stock options with modern production methods. (We'll leave out subsidies.) In the past and still in many places in the world, raising animals for eating and milking is the least amount of energy required, otherwise, they'd do otherwise and choose not to starve. Indeed, the common theme these days is that the modern vegan diet is pretty much only possible in areas like Europe with a particular climate and serves only to promote colonialism and dominance of the West.

    90. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      That's fine.

      Personally I'd choose the one that killed me instantly over the one that wouldn't.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    91. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 1

      You must be a blast at parties.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    92. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      amnesia

      what allows a woman to enjoy sex after childbirth

      Lighten Up Francine

    93. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Vegan zombies looking for soy based braaains!

    94. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by pots · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that paper's a joke. The author is basing his conclusion on the idea that cows foraging in a pasture will produce the same volume of food per unit of land as intensive crop production does. This is, of course, absurd. It's like that "animals have evolved to be tasty so that we will preserve their species" notion - it's just some silly nonsense.

      Maybe you meant it as a joke too, but you were modded "insightful" for some reason.

    95. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Clearly we should be going for the least amount of deaths per human

      Celery and all other plants are living things too. So are krill and protozoa. Eating celery kills it, and it takes a lot more celery lives than cow lives to keep a person running.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    96. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by pots · · Score: 1

      If you had that many cows and bulls then you were rich and every day was a special occasion. A typical family might have a single cow, and they only killed that cow for meat when it was too old to produce milk for cheese making.

    97. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      It's not the taste of blood that makes steaks and burgers delicious. Seriously, get some cow blood and taste it. It doesn't taste the way you think it does.

      You need lean muscle meat combined with fat in the right proportion to have that great flavor.

    98. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      NZ has an economy built on the processing of grass into animal protein and thereby predicated on the suffering of animals. In my view being a vegetarian is unpatriotic :-) .

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    99. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      I hope it was shitty Australian or Californian Chardonnay and not the classy Kiwi tipple.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    100. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      If I were a wild animal, I would much rather be killed by a human than by other wild animals. People at least have enough empathy to try to make the kill as swiftly and painlessly as possible.

      Killed? Sure. But I would choose any wild animal over an animal in an industrial facility. Cramped conditions, sometimes with no sunlight or even room to turn around and killed before even an adult. That's no enjoyable life at all. Now where I live we still have a lot of beef cattle that spend a year or two at pasture before being killed. Their life is still short but relatively pleasant. The pigs and chickens aren't as fortunate.

    101. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by skapunker21 · · Score: 1

      we should hold animal auditions - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    102. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 2

      A bunny's life is actually worth MORE than a cow's based on cuteness and relative flavor.

      I can only assume you are a city dweller? In a lot of rural areas, rabbits are a plague and it's open season to kill as many of them as you can. The phrase 'breed like a rabbit' actually comes from the fact rabbits (strange huh?). I would put them on the bottom of the list right near mosquitoes and flies.

    103. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      It's not blood, it's myoglobin.
      Your hate stems from a misunderstanding!

    104. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because "food" was the only subject mentioned above.

      I guess some people only read what they want to read.

      --
      No sig today...
    105. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Huh? He's the one saying "I'm not bothered about the slaughter of animals" and giving no justification.

      --
      No sig today...
    106. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      No, you so incorrect on so many levels.

      Packaged meat does indeed contain blood. It's what will ooze into your refrigerator if you leave it too long.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    107. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the world needs more soyboys.

      And I expect this process improves the bioavailability of phytoestrogens, which directly impact testosterone levels (and inhibit thyroid function, leading to a wide array of long-term medical problems).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    108. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by torkus · · Score: 1

      Well that's where speaking in absolutes gets people in trouble. Packaged meat does contain blood, however it contains far less blood than the meat originally did when it was part of an animal.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    109. Re: As a vegetarian since 15 years... by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. :)

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    110. Re:As a vegetarian since 15 years... by gnick · · Score: 1

      I said the system wasn't fair. You're acting like I just made it up.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  2. Eww? by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's weird... after having been vegetarian for 17 years, the concept of making a vegetarian burger taste more like meat only strikes feelings of "eww, gross" in me. And I imagine that's a pretty common reaction.

    But I guess it's good for non-vegetarians and maybe people who are newly vegetarian.

    On the upside, I imagine this product is a good source of iron, since heme iron is well absorbed.

    --
    "Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
    1. Re:Eww? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Well I for one welcome our new vegan overlords, and I will entreat them to dismiss your "eww, gross" reaction as mere girlish whimsy.

    2. Re:Eww? by CambodiaSam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not a vegetarian but have greatly reduced my meat intake over the years. I had the opportunity to try an Impossible Burger recently and I can confirm that it's freakishly like animal meat. Not 100% indistinguishable but so damn close that I was amazed. The guy at the restaurant warned me that many vegetarians don't like it because it's so close. He wasn't lying. If there is a safe option to help people eat less meat, that's probably good for health, the environment, and a number of other factors right? It's like a gateway veg. Just like bacon is the gateway meat.

    3. Re:Eww? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I'm not a vegetarian.

      But I like eating good vegetarian dishes. I'm basically the salad king ... not sure if cheese already is forbidden for vegetarians, the line between vegan and vegetarian is not clear for me.

      But I loath vegetarian food, that tries to mimic meat. Tofu is tofu, and good tofu is like a good cheese. Bastarding it into meet is a crime in my opinion. Same with that new attempt.

      Can't be so hard to eat a real Falafel instead of having a pseudo meat burger.

      But alas ... americans ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Eww? by radja · · Score: 1

      most cheeses are not vegetarian, because the rennet used comes from one of the stomachs of calves.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    5. Re:Eww? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I kinda doubt the food is aimed at hard-core vegans.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Eww? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      That's like saying tomatoes driven in a car with leather seats are not vegetarian.

      The amount of enzymes from rennet in actual cheese is measured in micrograms per kilogram.
      I.e. Unless one is eating kilograms of one particular cheese per meal, we're talking about parts per billion of "animal matter" per portion of cheese.
      At that range, eating any food prepared or handled by humans makes one a cannibal.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    7. Re:Eww? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      The biggest thing about the Impossible Burger is that it shows you can make a burger that tastes like a burger, without using beef. The target market is not vegetarians/vegans, as I presume they're already well-satisfied with portobello mushrooms and chickpea patties, or similar alternatives. They have plenty of veg* choices that play on their ingredients' own strengths, instead of trying to imitate meat.

      For the people who like the taste of burgers, but would prefer not to contribute to factory farming practices or have other ethical reasons, this is a good alternative. Personally, I don't care if my burger has beef or not, or whether it has real bacon or not. If it tastes like it has beef or bacon (or sufficiently similar), bring it on. I love the taste of a burger, but it is absolutely not a requirement for me that it actually contains beef. If they can give me the same taste without using beef, bring it on!

      --
      Eat the rich.
    8. Re:Eww? by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, I thought vegetarians would avoid it. But I run a science club at a university, and my Indian and Pakistani students who were raised vegetarian cannot get enough of the new meat. WE have a club outing every semester and I have to limit the number of spots. Maybe it is because they are more into the ecology and biotechnology aspects of it.

    9. Re:Eww? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      most cheeses are not vegetarian, because the rennet used comes from one of the stomachs of calves.

      It's not too difficult to find cheeses that use vegetable rennet. Any kosher cheese doesn't use animal rennet. You don't have quite the same variety available, but you can get the basics like cheddar and mozzarella.

    10. Re:Eww? by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      Likewise I had one recently, and I have to say, it wasn't the best burger I've ever had. It was far from the worst, however. And that's saying something.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    11. Re:Eww? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      the concept of making a vegetarian burger taste more like meat only strikes feelings of "eww, gross" in me.

      Why? Do you hate meat because of the taste or because you associate it with meat? Meat has an incredibly diverse and wonderful mix of flavours across many animals, so really to lump them together under "tastes like meat" sounds like the latter to me.

      It's sad denying such a diverse palate of flavours because of some percieved association.

    12. Re:Eww? by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      But I guess it's good for non-vegetarians and maybe people who are newly vegetarian.

      Maybe for some, but I for one prefer expensive ecologically farmed meat to industrialized fake-meat production. The same for lab-grown meat, it's seems to be primarily intended to replace highly dubious meat of unknown origin in processed fast food. For all I know, "Impossible Burgers" is just another wannabe future mass food corporation like Nestle. Nobody should eat this crap anyway.

      Due to intensive livestock farming and insanely long transport ways meat is way too cheap nowadays. If proper animal protection laws and ecological standards were in place, it would be a luxury good as it should be and that would also alleviate ethical concerns for people like me who think there is nothing wrong with slaughtering animals per se.

    13. Re:Eww? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I have been (mostly) vegetarian for 30 years, and I've never had this problem. I could absolutely eat a burger or pulled pork right now, and I'm confident it wouldn't make me feel queasy. I know a lot of people feel that way, but it's certainly not universal.

    14. Re:Eww? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Different levels of poverty yield different results. Not sure how someone adjusted for this non-tangible, at best elusive, factor. Also, cultural differences may not be attributable to race. No way to isolate that either.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    15. Re:Eww? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I never met a vegetarian who made that distinction.
      Either they eat cheese and are "vegetarians" or they don't and are "vegan".

      Natural cheese is not made with rennet anyway ... it ferments naturally.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  3. GRAS, We Pinky Swear by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading TFA (I know), it turns out that new food ingredients don't actually require FDA approval, since food companies can simply state that their novel ingredient is safe, and then the FDA probably won't challenge that. ~10% of all food ingredients haven't been FDA tested/assessed, due to this self-approval loophole, and a concerned party is suing the FDA to close it.

    Reading elsewhere on the net, the Impossible Burger tastes/looks/smells remarkably like a real hamburger. The Beyond Burger smells closer to real beef, but doesn't taste/feel as similar. If vegetable-based burgers can get this close, it makes me wonder if there'd be any market for lab-grown meat, which would presumably cost more to produce. Both veggie burgers seem to have the same amount of protein as beef burgers. One hitch: the impossible burger's heme is from GMO yeast, so the anti-GMO people will have a problem with that (probably a significant fraction of vegetarians).

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re: GRAS, We Pinky Swear by johnstrass1 · · Score: 1

      The FDA regulates prescription drugs. Everything else ( especially in this corrupt administration) gets OKd with little analysis. Thatâ(TM)s why people are taking âoe fish oilâ supplements which have no health benefit and likely will kill a subset of people, like vitamin E was doing a few years ago.

    2. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Reading TFA (I know), it turns out that new food ingredients don't actually require FDA approval, since food companies can simply state that their novel ingredient is safe, and then the FDA probably won't challenge that. ~10% of all food ingredients haven't been FDA tested/assessed, due to this self-approval loophole, and a concerned party is suing the FDA to close it.

      Seems to me if that were the case it would be the other way around. As in, if it doesn't legally require testing and you can self declare something as safe then only about 10% of it would be properly tested/approved.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    3. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend gets violently sick when she has an Impossible burger. She's tried them at different locations to the same result. I'm curious if there is an allergy or some other sensitivity that causes it. I'd be curious how extensive testing was, and if others have this reaction.

    4. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by edi_guy · · Score: 1

      I've had the Impossible Burger and it's pretty decent. It's not the best burger I've had, but good. I wouldn't get one regularly at the current pricepoint, but my hope/wish is that they will get the price down and move this tech down to McDonalds, Wendy's, BK, etc (but leave In N Out alone!). If we as a society could greatly reduce the amount of beef consumed it would be beneficial to all in both health, and environment.

    5. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Slow learner? If something makes me puke, I never eat it again anywhere, nor buy from the same organization again.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:GRAS, We Pinky Swear by mentil · · Score: 1
      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  4. Sodium by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the sodium content of this is though? I've tried a few vegan fake meats before out of curiosity, and lot of them seem to be 30%+ of the daily value per serving.

    I'd rather just eat natural stuff like nuts, avocado, mushrooms, beans, etc for protein and not bother with imitating meat (I'm not even a vegetarian, just try their stuff sometimes).

  5. Still waiting.... by Tokolosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do we never see reports that steak is being processed to taste like tofu?

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Still waiting.... by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      That's no challenge, just come and try the steak at my local.

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    2. Re:Still waiting.... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Cook it for more than 2 minutes on each side and it starts resembling the taste of tofu.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Still waiting.... by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      Isn't that called lard?

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    4. Re:Still waiting.... by jythie · · Score: 1

      I've seen some recipes from the early 1900s that come pretty close. 'boil everything till it has the constancy of mush and the taste of cardboard so that older more distinguished guests do not have to worry about dentures!'.

  6. Yes ewwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've been a vegetarian since birth, and come from a family of vegetarians (since grandparents on both sides "converted"). I've started to eat some red meat when I was 40, for health reasons.

    I these days steer away from foodstuffs that are heavily processed (vegetable and animal sourced). My diet consists of mostly vegetable matter as it comes off the plant and animal protein as it came off or out of the animal/bird - preferably pasture fed.

    As a male, I also avoid soy.

    I'm not convinced that one can make something with a concoction of chemicals that is even closely as healthy to put inside your body than it is to just get it how nature has made it for millennia and our bodies are finely tuned to utilize through generations of selection?

    I actually agree with other vegetarian posters: the likeness to meat of fake meat is actually a detractor, not a good selling point. If you make a choice to eat vegetables, you want your food to taste like that.

    1. Re:Yes ewwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > I'm not convinced that one can make something with a concoction of chemicals that is even closely as healthy to put inside your body than it is to just get it how nature has made it for millennia and our bodies are finely tuned to utilize through generations of selection?

      ???

      Everything you eat is are just concoctions of chemicals. Your body is merely just a large chemical processing plant. Your body is not aware somehow of where the chemicals it is processing came from. Your opinion really makes no sense.

      > If you make a choice to eat vegetables, you want your food to taste like that.

      Projecting is an undesirable trait in a human being, I would stop doing it if you hope to have any kind of social or romantic life.

    2. Re:Yes ewwwwww by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      We use our minds to determine what food substances are healthy, and choose accordingly (or not). Nature, on the other hand, frequently tries to poison us. Have some digitalis, sumac, raw cassava root, etc..

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Yes ewwwwww by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      > I'm not convinced that one can make something with a concoction of chemicals that is even closely as healthy to put inside your body than it is to just get it how nature has made it for millennia and our bodies are finely tuned to utilize through generations of selection?

      ???

      Everything you eat is are just concoctions of chemicals. Your body is merely just a large chemical processing plant. Your body is not aware somehow of where the chemicals it is processing came from. Your opinion really makes no sense.

      There are many "co-factors" in naturally grown foods that are just too expensive to manufacture, occur in minute quantities, possibly are unknown and are thus not replicated, etc. Some enzymes in vegetables and fruit, for example, are pretty important to a healthy digestion, but having them in food makes the shelf life much shorter. Luckily for food processors, heat above about 65 deg C destroys these, so after cooking and canning, or pasteurization, putting a "best before" date on it becomes a more predictable process. Another example is the naturally occurring bacteria of various Lactobacillus species in vegetables. These are also important to proper digestion and gut health.

      My body is certainly not only a "basically large chemical processing plant" (but for the chemical processes that DO occur, having all the necessary reagents on hand is important - e.g. enzymes - else the process is stopped or the rate of reaction is much too slow). There are some "mechanics" involved (e.g. fiber's effect on blood sugar uptake amongst others), there's some microbial symbiosis involved (it's better to take good care of those populations in one's gut), etc.

      Why not eat some nice green potatoes and potato shoots tonight? They're just chemicals after all and one's body (including liver) can handle chemicals that occur in them just fine? (It's even from a source that I would find acceptable...) One does do so not because "chemicals" is a very wide term and both the type of chemicals as well as their quantity make a difference to one's body.

      > If you make a choice to eat vegetables, you want your food to taste like that.

      Projecting is an undesirable trait in a human being, I would stop doing it if you hope to have any kind of social or romantic life.

      I certainly do not want to have a social or romantic life with you, but mine is otherwise quite OK, thank you for your concern.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    4. Re:Yes ewwwwww by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Except the copycat version does not have every little thing that the real one has. No matter how much you try, you are never going to get it perfect.
      Just look at all the vegetarians in India. The only way they aren't dying by the millions, is because they accidentally eat insects that get into all their grain.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  7. Approval? by raburton · · Score: 2

    From the letter it actually looks like the FDA said that they see no reason not to take the manufacturers word for it that it's safe, not that they have actually concluded for themselves that it is safe. I don't know if that counts as "approval", but I think the distinction is important.

    Based on the information that Impossible Foods provided, as well as other information available to FDA, we have no questions at this time regarding Impossible Foods’ conclusion that soy leghemoglobin preparation is GRAS under its intended conditions of use to optimize flavor in ground beef analogue products intended to be cooked. This letter is not an affirmation that soy leghemoglobin preparation is GRAS under 21 CFR 170.35.

  8. We need more of this ... by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... to get the meat junkies off their fix. The eco-balance of meat is truely abysmal. Like just a few notches short of plutonium or something. If we could switch to a substitute without anybody noticing, that would be awesome and also finally get anti-biotics out of meat production and back into healthcare, where they belong. That would also get agriculture back into sane waters.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Humans are omnivores, we evolved bigger brains because we learned to process meat and eventually started cooking it. Farming eventually allowed us to turn small plots of fast-growing but ultimately inedible crops into high protein/carb meat instead of working large swathes of land for little food value in plant material.

      Some farming practices are indeed abysmal and we eat way too much meat right now, but totally removing it is impossible, unhealthy and would upset nature's balance more. Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible.

      Being a vegetarian, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:We need more of this ... by chill · · Score: 1

      No. Not even close, no. In fact, 100% opposite wrong.

      Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible.

      It takes more farmland to raise cattle for consumption than it would plants. That is, the cows eat more plants than we do -- acting as middlemen in the food production process. The actual land use for farming, if animals as food were eliminated, would go DOWN.

      Plant foods such as rice, beans, potatoes, leafy greens, grains, and cruciferous vegetables are significantly cheaper than meat products. The only expensive part is trying to create something that so simulates meat that it is difficult to tell the difference.

      Being primarily a meat eater, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it.

      https://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/facts-on-animal-farming-and-the-environment/

      Don't like that one? There are many, many other links. Feel free to go back to original sources, such as government statistics on land use, water use, fertilizer use and cost, etc. Meat is damned expensive compared to plants.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Totally removing meat would require much more farm land to be devoted to edible crops to the point it may actually be impossible."

      That statement couldn't be more wrong. All the food those animals eat has to be grown somewhere and much of the food they eat does not become the muscle fiber we eat, it either serves other purposes for the animal or gets expelled in their poop. On top of that, there's the space the animals need to live in and this space goes up the more ethically you want your meat raised.

      This makes meat production an incredibly inefficient means of general food production. If we didn't eat meat we would use significantly less farm land in total.

      From/; http://www.bbc.com/future/stor...

      "Food, especially livestock, also takes up a lot of room – a source of both greenhouse gas emissions due to land conversion and of biodiversity loss. Of the world’s approximately five billion hectares (12 billion acres) of agricultural land, 68% is used for livestock."

      Don't get me wrong in any of this, I eat meat. I just couldn't let something some obviously wrong go by without saying something.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    4. Re:We need more of this ... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I object to the term "meat junkies", as I don't think anyone is actually addicted to meat.

      For me, I like the taste of a burger. If I can get the same taste without meat, that's great! That's what the impossible burger promises, and I would love to give it a go.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    5. Re:We need more of this ... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      There's a reason you're arguing for cows and not chickens.

    6. Re:We need more of this ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It takes more farmland to raise cattle for consumption than it would plants.

      Grazing land can be on a slope. Using mechanical farming methods, food agricultural land has to be flat. The two don't have to compete.

      With that said, most of the world eats mostly goats and chickens, and then cows. As much as I like eating beef, cows may have to go. They are delicate and fiddly compared to goats, which can turn kudzu or poison oak into meat.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:We need more of this ... by chill · · Score: 1

      Keeping in mind I was responding to grossly inaccurate specific claims in the parent post. Yes, beef is the most impactful and hugely symbolic. Yes, moving to chickens instead of beef would be a wonderful move when measured in impact to resource consumption and impact on the environment. And moving to plants would be even better. Either is a major win.

      Pork, chicken, dairy and eggs are equivalent within a factor of two when it came to their environmental burdens, the authors determined. But beef requires far, far more resources than any of those other protein categories. The team calculated that beef requires 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer and 11 times more water compared to those other food sources. That adds up to about five times more greenhouse gas emissions.

      To further put these findings into perspective, the authors also ran the same calculations for several staple crops. All told, on a calorie-to-calorie basis, potatoes, wheat and rice require two to six time less resources to produce than pork, chicken, eggs or dairy.

      https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/beef-uses-ten-times-more-resources-poultry-dairy-eggs-pork-180952103/

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    8. Re:We need more of this ... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      As I noted above, I got to try one recently, and it wasn't the best burger I've ever had. However, if it was half the price, I'd probably order it somewhat often. I think with better (real) cheese on it, if it was cooked properly (it was medium well), and seasoned better, it would have been fine.

      And that's coming from someone who is a bit of a burger snob.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    9. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Being a vegetarian, in the end, is a luxury, not a necessity and only rich people can truly afford it."

      Shit, I didn't read your whole post before posting. This also couldnt be more wrong. Poor people in third world country's are vegetarians or mostly vegetarians because they simply can't afford to eat meat like we do in the US. Only when you get into first world meat substitutes does vegetarianism get more expensive than meat.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    10. Re:We need more of this ... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Meat production might be inefficient on a per acre basis. But animals can be grazed on unimproved grasslands. And with global warming, we are going to be seeing a lot more of these in the northern latitudes. On the other hand, growing plants for human consumption generally requires plowing under the native plant species and using the land to support monocultures. And using a lot of water, fertilizer and pesticides to do so.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    11. Re:We need more of this ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      ... to get the meat junkies off their fix. The eco-balance of meat is truely abysmal. Like just a few notches short of plutonium or something. If we could switch to a substitute without anybody noticing, that would be awesome and also finally get anti-biotics out of meat production and back into healthcare, where they belong. That would also get agriculture back into sane waters.

      I'd be very happy to eat a meat substitute that fulfilled all the functions of meat (including tasting good) and didn't require animals to be killed.

      If this turns out to be it, great, if not, I hope they keep working on it.

    12. Re: We need more of this ... by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      I quoted those same words above. It seems we just repeat old arguments whenever vegetarianism is the topic here.

      It's not natural.
      It's not healthy.
      It's bad for animals/the environment.
      I like meat.
      I hate vegetarians.
      I really hate vegans.

    13. Re:We need more of this ... by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      This is the sort of ignorant drivel spouted by cloistered city types who wouldn't know how to grow a tomato. There are billions of acres of land perfectly suited for grazing cattle and sheep that are totally unsuitable for any sort of crop production. Drive around Colorado or Wyoming sometime.

    14. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Which is what I said in the first place although vegetarians lack the energy to properly read.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    15. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      If you have to raise your own crops and animals, then to a point you have to be mostly vegetarian, raising beef isn't done when you're poor, but keeping poultry and pigs is a good source of protein.

      I'm not saying what we are consuming in the US is healthy, but religious practices across time and lands have established many rituals surrounding both eating, raising and subsequent sharing meat with the rest of the tribe as a valued commodity. If meat wasn't easy to do and more beneficial for us than eating plants, we would've never evolved to do that.

      Meat protein, especially cooked, takes much less energy to produce and consume compared to plant meat.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    16. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Because we consume way too much meat, I didn't say we are carnivores. Dogs are carnivores, bears have evolved to allow for the potential to be exclusively carnivores and will prefer meat over berries. Many animals (including dogs, but also many raccoons and even squirrels) have been found to get diabetes and heart disease if their diets are based on first world human food waste.

      Current science also suggests that meat took less energy to produce and takes less energy to process in your body than plants, hence why we and many other animals prefer to eat meat if it's available.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    17. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      "Mostly vegetarian" is not vegetarian. Being vegetarian/vegan takes a lot of energy to produce and consume your food. Even though I'm not recommending to eat 10kg of meat per day, humans have evolved to consume some meat/fish and evolved to eat it because it has a much higher energy density than plants so you can eat less of it and require less energy to consume it.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    18. Re:We need more of this ... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Open your mouth. Unless you're a crackhead, you most likely have sharp front teeth and molars.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    19. Re:We need more of this ... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Saying chicken and pigs are "within a factor of two" is bullshit. Humans need protein, particularly developing humans, and getting it from plants is borderline impossible. Chickens are used to turn bugs and seeds into usable protein, and their food supply is minimal. Think about it - you can buy a chicken at the store in the US for $7 or so. That means that a lifetime supply of food for the chicken cost maybe $.50. See what that'll buy you in the produce section.

      Pigs are used by humans to turn garbage into usable protein and fat. They eat anything. People feed them crap like corn stalks. This doesn't even effect the human food supply since they're eating byproducts of our plant production. There's no "2-1" ratio here - they eat crap that would be thrown away otherwise. They're literally free.

      Beef is a luxury. Pigs and chickens aren't. If you visit the developing world, you'll find those two animals are well-represented in the farming industry because they're so efficient at feeding people.

    20. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen pricing on grass fed beef? Most of our live stock is not grazed because that's too expensive in terms of land use. It's much cheaper to feed them corn and soy (people food) which is why we do exactly that.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    21. Re:We need more of this ... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      ""Mostly vegetarian" is not vegetarian."

      Thanks for that genius. The point is that meat is not commonly eaten by third world poor because it's expensive so they are either vegetarians or mostly so because of cost. In other words, it is not a philosophical preference that drives many people to not eat meat, it's that meat is expensive and therefor being a vegetarian is not a "luxury" as you stated above.

      This really should be common sense for anyone who buys their own groceries and cooks. For any given meal the most expensive thing on a meat eaters plate is usually the meat.

      " Even though I'm not recommending to eat 10kg of meat per day, humans have evolved to consume some meat/fish and evolved to eat it because it has a much higher energy density than plants so you can eat less of it and require less energy to consume it."

      This all has nothing to do with whether being a vegetarian is a luxury or not.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  9. Texture by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    It took companies a couple of decades to perfect the texture of ground beef which, all things considered, isn't too far off from ground up beans or mushrooms in emulsified plant-based fat, probably oil. The secret of the impossible burger is getting the emulsifier right.

    Getting the texture of unprocessed meat, which is closely packed muscle fiber interspersed with fat, is probably impossible using plant-based structures.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Texture by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      Never say never, people are clever and dedicated. The best current technique is a variation on current extruders used for veggie burgers. It utilizes shear force to cause muscle-like fibers to form:

      https://spectrum.ieee.org/gree...

  10. Re:This could help the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can acheive the same by disallowing import from the Amazon region - and anywhere else that don't live up to your environmental standards. Many countries make their own meat, in ways acceptable to the local population.

  11. Eat meat ffs by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Avoiding animal products. People who do not eat any meat, fish, poultry, or dairy products are at risk of becoming deficient in vitamin B12, since B12 is only found naturally in animal products. Thatâ(TM)s why vegans should make sure to include B12-fortified foods or a B12 supplement in their diets. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/n...

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re: Eat meat ffs by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      That only applies to strict vegans though. Vegetarians can eat dairy foods and many people don't fit in neat categories: they mght be mostly vegan or vegetarians who eat fish etc. The half billion Indian vegetarians seem to be coping OK without vitamin supplements.

    2. Re:Eat meat ffs by joshuaf · · Score: 1

      It's easily available from bacterial cultures and that's where b12 supplements have been coming from since I think at least the 70s.

  12. Great. Call me in 30 years by nagora · · Score: 1

    If this stuff is still believed to be safe in 3 decades of actual use, then I'll give it a go or at least evaluate the dangers.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Great. Call me in 30 years by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Paranoid much? It's a soy protein. Soy proteins are used in fucking everything and have been for decades now. That's why the GRAS request was pretty much a non-issue.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Great. Call me in 30 years by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      By that logic, a soy genetically modified to express cyanide would be no problem.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  13. Protein called heme by vossman77 · · Score: 4, Informative

    soy leghemoglobin, releases a protein called heme that gives the meat substitute its distinctive blood-like color and taste

    Oh my god, so much wrong with this sentence:

    • leghemoglobin is the protein
    • heme is an organic molecule
    • leghemoglobin does not RELEASE heme, it holds the molecule inside
    • when the heme molecule in the protein binds oxygen it provides the red color.

    source: I am a biochemistry lecturer and wikipedia

    1. Re:Protein called heme by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      I should also say that while leghemoglobin, is different from human hemoglobin or myoglobin, all have heme that binds oxygen and turns red.

    2. Re:Protein called heme by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think when they say leghemoglobin "releases" heme, they aren't referring to its physiological function, but the result of denaturing during cooking, which is an unnatural process.

      As you cook muscle, the myoglobin denatures exposing the iron in heme to oxidation, which turns the meat from red to brown. This oxidized heme plays a role in the development of other complex flavor molecules in coordination with other classes of compounds like lipids. For example the higher myoglobin content in wild duck breast meat gives it a liver-like flavor.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Protein called heme by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      source: I am a biochemistry lecturer and wikipedia

      You are a wikipedia? That's impressive!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  14. Name Change? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    What?...they didn't want to call it Soylent Red, or Frankenburger?

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:Name Change? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,
      frankenburger is not taken yet, but "frankfurter wuerstchen" is!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Name Change? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Frankenburger wouldn't be too much off, considering that we already have the Hamburger.

      Fun fact while we're at edible towns. The town of Vienna is called in German "Wien". Which, yes, makes the people living there "Wiener".

      Trying to scare us with Soylent Green? Please, we've been eating each other around here for millennia!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Name Change? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I think you're actually looking for Frankenburg.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Name Change? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Having spent six years in Deutschland, I've been to all of those cities...don't forget about the Weiner Schnitzel!

      I had not intention of putting a scare into anyone, only an weak attempt at a wisecrack. Note that eating our young doesn't count.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:Name Change? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      "Frankenburger" makes me think of Al Franken - a truly toxic idea.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  15. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Informative

    Strange that no one of the die hard vegetarians knows that ...

    No idea why you americans keep spreading that myth. First of all the vitamin in question is not "B" but "B12".

    Then: there are plenty of vegan foods that have plenty of B vitamins of any type, like 11 or 12. E.g. mushrooms, Sauerkraut, fermented Soy, like Tofu, Algae, even black tea comes to mind, everything containing yeast, e.g. beer! Who had guessed that, beer contains vitamin B! Carrots and other "root vegetables".

    Sorry, that you only can get vitamin B* from meat is the biggest lie in the internet.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  16. 30 Years...and counting by buravirgil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Meat's not Murder, as much as I enjoy Morrisey; It's slaughter. And I admire meat-eaters who address sustainable farms to address factory farming and respect any perspective to appeal to HOW animals are raised and rendered after I had read Diet for a Small Planet (https://www.smallplanet.org/diet-for-a-small-planet) and Robbins' book (the Baskin/Robbins heir who was conned by Madoff) in 1990. I went lacto-ovo vegan and made soy "milk", and my own gluten (ashamed I couldn't master tempeh cultures) and supplemented my diet with nutritional yeast for B complex vitamins and explored every meat substitute available and can claim I was spared seasonal flus for years. Fifteen years later, friends half a generation younger, mocked my preferences to seek out substitutes with the same texture and "mouth feel" as akin to wearing a fake fur. It was my first experience with shifts in generational perspective, I think. (The second is a pervasive belief microwave appliances are dangerous.) Anyway, Morning Star brand was some of the best commercially available (and affordable) product (but used egg whites for texture) and leveraged by the growing market of baby-boomers reduction of cholesterol consumption: Tinfoil Advisory-- Morning Star's "Prime" product was the best I had ever experienced and disappeared from the market for over two decades because (I believe) it was TOO Good. At about this time, Oprah took on the Beef trade associations and was summarily silenced on the subject, the only topic from which I believe she has EVER backed away. Supply/Demand arguments have been the reason given for the 3-4X cost of livestock for three decades. Qorn was prevented from North American shelves for over a decade for reasons ignored when it came to Frito-Lay's potato chip products...end of Advisory...

    In 2010, I returned to being an omnivore, but I miss the days of chasing down "mouth feel" substitutes because the science is interesting, and the business angles are very intriguing. Textured vegetable protein (a fantastic substitute in Chile adopted by Hormel a loooong time ago) is the best example of an affordable substitute and industrially compressed gluten that simulated a roast beef that I experienced in Oakland and LA's Whole foods deli sections is the most expensive (5X that of steak), but truly a delicacy.

    In 1990, Robbins' claimed that, without government subsidized water rights, a dollar hamburger in the US would cost $6. I don't know if that's factual because there aren't many sources or studies to cross reference, but such an estimate goes a long way in explaining why the market is, in my humble opinion, so controlled.

    --
    Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
    1. Re: 30 Years...and counting by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Anyone else give up on this rambling word salad halfway through?

      I managed to read and understand it in the time it took you to post bitching about it. Maybe you need to do some work on your parser. For the textually challenged:

      * Meat isn't murder
      * Author demonstrates post-vegetarian qualifications
      * Meat substitutes are interesting
      * Meat has powerful lobbies
      * Meat is government-subsidized

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:30 Years...and counting by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I think the concept of a paragraph has just been murdered.

    3. Re:30 Years...and counting by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In 1990, Robbins' claimed that, without government subsidized water rights, a dollar hamburger in the US would cost $6. I don't know if that's factual because there aren't many sources or studies to cross reference, but such an estimate goes a long way in explaining why the market is, in my humble opinion, so controlled.

      The market is controlled because of the foot shortages we experienced after the Dust Bowl which exacerbated the Great Depression. That's when the government realized, holy crap it's really possible for a modern developed country to not produce enough food to feed itself. Consequently, we enacted all sorts of subsidies to insure there's always an oversupply of food. It's why we pay farmers not to plant anything - so if another dust bowl should wipe out a large chunk of the country's farmland, we have plenty of reserve farmland ready and available to immediately go back into production.

      The consequence of all these subsidies is overproduction. That leads to the market price dropping to unsustainable levels (farmers cannot sell their crops for enough to cover their expenses). That's where the other government subsidies come in. The government buys all these crops at a fixed price, thus allowing the farmers to stay in business. The government then acts as a monopoly source and resells the food at a higher price to distributors like supermarkets. That lets them recoup most of the subsidy (but not all - the discrepancy is minimized when the crops are bought at market price; and since the crops are not bought at market price the subsidy always ends up being greater than zero).

      But the supply of food exceeds the demand. So the government is still left with more food than it can hope to sell. Rather than let the excess rot in grain silos, it has to come up with other ways to use it. Some of it becomes foreign aid sent to other countries. High fructose corn syrup is another byproduct of this food oversupply. As is ethanol to mix with gasoline. But a large portion of it becomes cheap grain to feed to cattle, since Americans love beef. This is food that was going to rot in grain silos if not used, so the money spent growing it and subsidizing it is a sunk cost and unrecoverable, and thus shouldn't be a factor in how you decide to use it. Any money you can recoup from selling it is a positive.

      In other words, if the subsidies really did raise the price of a dollar hamburger to $6, ending subsidized meat production wouldn't mean we're saving $5. Since meat production is actually a money source to offset a sunk cost (selling grain that was going to otherwise rot), ending it would actually increase the cost of these food programs to the government. If the cattle industry wasn't buying all that excess grain, the government would have to pay the entire cost of subsidizing that overproduction. So the extra $5 in cost per hamburger would get distributed over all the grain and corn that's sold to supermarkets. And you'd see the price of grains and vegetables increase to pay for the subsidy that the meat industry is no longer paying to help offset.

    4. Re:30 Years...and counting by buravirgil · · Score: 1

      The market is controlled because of the foot shortages we experienced after the Dust Bowl which exacerbated the Great Depression.

      You explanation goes a long way in allowing me to put away several rolls of foil-- sincerely-- Thank you.

      --
      Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
    5. Re:30 Years...and counting by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There's something awfully screwy about your logic. Ending all government expenditures that meddle in the food market cannot increase the governmental cost of all expenditures that meddle in the food market.

      There are other problems in your post. For instance, government policy was a major contributing factor in the food shortages during the Great Depression.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  17. Why am I an omnivore ? by Salgak1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat, and the premolars and molars evolved for grinding vegetable matter. I go with what my biology is optimized for.

    I will add that almost every animal source is edible, and the vast majority of plant life is either inedible or actually toxic in some way. I stick with what works. . .

    1. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought that too, but the other day I say a Neanderthal skull in a museum. The teeth look like a mouth full of molars, ready to eat plants, and yet further analysis shows they also ate meat. We've evolved as omnivores, capable of thriving with a wide variety of different diets.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat,

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      Incisors? They work for plants, too. Biting apples is much easier with incisors than molars.

      The puny little canines that humans still have? Throwbacks to when we used to fight like gorillas. No use at all for hunting/killing.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      We have a mouth full of small and wimpy teeth, optimized for eating cooked food and hunting with tools. I do agree that we are omnivores, but comparing our teeth to other animals isn't very useful to prove that.

    4. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by aevan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    5. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      They also don't have apolipoprotein E2-E4, which developed after our common ancestors split, and is a big factor in how much meat we can eat.

    6. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      "There's plenty of opportunities" for adding mammal DNA to gorilla scat after the fact, Schubert said. "I don't really think they're eating meat."

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by aevan · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I looked at it more like: 'if Gorillas are 'close to people'... then young gorillas eating things they shouldn't, and desperate/bored gorillas eating things they normally wouldn't... is to be expected."

    8. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I think we should wait until they actually film a gorilla hunting other monkeys before deciding.

      Either way, it's obvious that gorillas don't have their canines for the same reason lions do.

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat,

      The thing is, though, that if you were quoting from the last hundred plus years of anthropological observation and concensus, you'd be repeating that stuff and not just some gibberish that laypeople repeat to one another in the echo chamber because it sounds right.

      Hint: that stuff you said? It wasn't that other stuff. ;)

    10. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      Probably why humans endanger gorilla habitat, rather than gorillas endangering human habitat.

    11. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      What? We've hunted most predators that could harm us to extinction or near extinction. As soon as we discovered fire and tools, gorillas were food or an inconvenience that needed to be dealt with. What they eat has no bearing on whether or not humans can and will kill them at will.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    12. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      Evoltuion takes a similar solution to multiple problems. Eating meat is one thing, to do that you gotta kill it first. A gorilla on the other hand uses their canines to grab and snap branches.

      That doesn't change the fact that 99% of animals out there use them for holding onto that juicy animal they just bit.

    13. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I was going to say: "Creimer, is that you?"

      Low and behold....he outed himself.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    14. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      The mildly toxic constituents of edible plant life provide some amazing cellular-level benefits which trickle up to the health of the whole organism.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    15. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Could it be considered the height of irony to jest at people so stupid they can't understand their own source material while appealing to an intensely academic idea like evolution?

      These people can't even read their Bible right.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    16. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      We have thumbs, brains, and can run for freakin ever. We don't need to get close enough to bite something to kill it. Doing so is counterproductive most of the time, at least with animals of significant fractions of our body mass or larger.

      "Biting apples is much easier with..." has so many faulty assumptions loaded into it, it isn't even wrong. Apples have not always been the same size as they are now. Apples aren't a staple food that people subsisted on and induced genetic changes. Sigh, there's so many layers of WTF in your statement I can't even.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    17. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      Aside from our teeth, the rest of our digestive tract is far closer to that of a wolf than that of a gorilla or chimpanzee. There are no nutrients required for human health that are not available on a purely carnivorous diet. Any nutrients needed that are available from plant sources are far more bio-available to humans from animal sources. Much of the nutrition in plants is bound up with anti-nutrients like phytates and oxylates so that very little of them are used.

    18. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      Have a nice long look at a bear's teeth. That's what an omnivore's teeth are supposed to look like. Also try killing any of the animals you eat with your bear hands and then trying to eat them with no tools.

    19. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat,

      Nope. Gorillas have massive canines but they never eat meat.

      And that's why they're stuck where they are. If you eat meat you have a much better and more efficient source of protein, and your brain develops much better.

    20. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Those aren't toxic. Try again.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    21. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Take a look in the mirror, and smile. The Incisors and Canines in your mouth evolved primarily for eating meat, and the premolars and molars evolved for grinding vegetable matter. I go with what my biology is optimized for.

      Your body is optimised to adapt to its environment. The teeth you currently have are a result of previous experiences of your ancestors, but you are by no means a finished product. So if optimisation is your thing, then adapting to new things should be your primary goal.

    22. Re:Why am I an omnivore ? by piers_downunder · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and that's why animals like horses, which have been strict herbivores for tens of millions of years, never grow canine teeth. Oh, except male horses often do, because canine teeth are useful in fighting other males. And they also often grow "wolf teeth", which are only useful for tearing meat, because millions of years ago their evolutionary ancestor was an omnivore. Perhaps it's better not to look at teeth in order to decide what your diet should be.

    23. Re: Why am I an omnivore ? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      At no point in my post did I either endorse or condemn the veracity of evolution or the Genesis account.

      You're an excellent example of what I was referring to. You can't read two sentences in plain English without fucking it up completely. How could you be expected to understand something as academically dense as the evidence and conjecture surrounding the fossil record?

      Without the ability to read, understand, and form a relevant and cogent reply, you're a terrible endorsement for anything you say you stand for.

      I will give you this accolade. At least you aren't taking your inability to read and turning it into a whole new branch of religion.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  18. Re:This could help the environment by danbert8 · · Score: 1

    Yes, instead we can clear rainforest to grow plants for ethanol! Because biofuels are so good for the environment!

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  19. Re:SoyBoys by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You're just jealous that I get to fondle some nice tits!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    Yeast does not produce B12. Fermenting also does not produce B12. B12 is produced by a specific bacteria.

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Why is there so much focus on Soy? by oic0 · · Score: 1

    I may have a bit of a conflict of interest here since I'm allergic to soy, but its one of the most common food allergies. I wish the food industry would stop their obsession with it. They put it in literally everything now days and the FDA says they dont even have to put it on the allergy list if they only use lecithin or the oil which is some BS because it still makes us sick.

    1. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by vossman77 · · Score: 1

      If I were you I would probably still not try it (too risky), but I doubt you would have any allergic reaction. The soy plant is not involved in the process. They took the protein DNA sequence from soy and inserted it into yeast, so really it is a yeast product not soy. Other ingredients include coconut and potato.

      Much like human insulin is produced by yeast, but we do not have to worry about the blood type of the insulin sequence that came from human.

    2. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It has a lot to do with farming resources. [...] Soy is relatively easy to grow and has a high protein content for a plant; like all plants it's not the right kind of protein but it's close.

      The vast majority of Soy in the USA is GMO, which is only a problem because the most relevant modification is glyphosphate resistance. Glyphosphate doesn't break down in anaerobic conditions, and mechanical food production creates hardpan which causes those conditions. Thus, it enters the water supply. More soy in the ground means more glyphosphate in you. The rest of the world recognizes glyphosphate as a carcinogen.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Why is there so much focus on Soy? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      There's not a lot of plant-based protein sources that are as easily grown and thus inexpensive.

  23. Re:SoyBoys by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The estrogen should take care of that too, your chest will look like it's been waxed 10 minutes ago.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Mmm bacon. Bacon isn't meat, I used to say by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Yep, bacon is the gateway drug.

    My first ~ year as a vegetarian, I liked to point out that bacon is crispy. Meat isn't crispy. If you cook some meat and leave it sitting out on the counter all day, it'll spoil in a few hours. You can cook bacon and leave it out for days, weeks even if you cover it to keep the dust and flies off. Therefore bacon must not be meat, I can eat it, I said. :)

    1. Re:Mmm bacon. Bacon isn't meat, I used to say by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Yep, bacon is the gateway drug.

      My first ~ year as a vegetarian, I liked to point out that bacon is crispy. Meat isn't crispy. If you cook some meat and leave it sitting out on the counter all day, it'll spoil in a few hours. You can cook bacon and leave it out for days, weeks even if you cover it to keep the dust and flies off. Therefore bacon must not be meat,

      Crispy bacon is disgusting. Bacon should be soft. The last cruise I went on, they separated their bacon in the buffet between crispy and soft and I thought I was in heaven.

      I do like your way of thinking, though. I make the argument that mac and cheese counts as a vegetable because it can be served with a vegetable plate.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Hmmm by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    I enjoy a vegetarian meal but I've never understood the search for a meat substitute. When I want meat I eat it, when I want vegetarian I eat that way. There are plenty of vegetarian dishes that I would choose to eat purely because of the taste. I personally think the idea of a gene moded wholly artificial key ingredient sort of defeats the purpose of a vegetarian, or raw diet I wonder if it would qualify as Halal or Kosher ? I think of Soylent : Green when I consider stuff like this...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Hmmm by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Meat production costs a lot, so maybe you could have a burger that is healthier (?) and also much cheaper. Think how cheap beans are vs ground beef. Might be a way to make a dystopian nutrient paste more pleasant to slurp, at least.

    2. Re:Hmmm by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Think how cheap beans are vs ground beef.

      And then think about how I would rather eat ground beef than cheap beans. Supply and demand, no one wants to eat your cheap ass beans.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    3. Re:Hmmm by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Exactly! But what if you got the same taste and texture as beef at the price of the lame beans!

  27. Re:Name Change? Try "Freakenburger." by pem · · Score: 1

    After all, look at the target market.

  28. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    A shame Harvard is such a shitty institute they got this all wrong.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  29. The hypocrite truth of Vegetarianism by Eloking · · Score: 1

    I found that funny that vegetarians (and vegans) said that they want to help animal with one hand and found initiative like Impossible Foods with the other.

    "Wait, those two things both help animal" you might say.

    Well, let's take the hypothesis that in 200 years this succeed and eventually all meat are replace with "laboratory" meat. That would be wonderful for the ~ 800 million pigs and the ~ 1000 cattle, right?

    Oh wait, they don't exist anymore, except in zoo. After all, extinction sound a lot better than husbandry don't you think?

    --
    Elok
    1. Re:The hypocrite truth of Vegetarianism by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, they don't exist anymore, except in zoo.

      Zoos are exploitation. Those will have to go too.

    2. Re:The hypocrite truth of Vegetarianism by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Hypocrites, because noone would ever keep farmyard animals as pets.

      Your definition of "husbandry" was also why "agricultural operation interference" laws were invented, to prevent people from being made aware of inhumane practices in feed lots and factory farms.

      As a proud member of PETA (people eating tasty animals) I find your trolling leaves much to be desired.

  30. Re:This could help the environment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Yes, instead we can clear rainforest to grow plants for ethanol!

    Is anyone actually doing that? AFAICT most of the plants grown for ethanol are grown right here in the USA. The corn grown for ethanol is however almost universally grown continuously, meaning without even letting fields lie fallow, let alone use of crop rotation. That's how we got the dust bowl the first time... BOHICA!

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    Yes and no - 'reliable' is the key word. Other foods may or may not have B12, and in varying amounts, so the safest choice is to take a B12 supplement. Health organizations like the USADA also say that everyone over 50yrs of age should also be taking a B12 supplement, and I bet that age will only continue to go down. B12 deficiency generally has more to do with one's ability to absorb it than amount consumed, so best just make sure you get much more than actually 'required' to maximize absorption.

  32. Congrats on never being hungry by huckamania · · Score: 1

    First world problems and attitude all in one post. Very humble brag of you.

  33. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by Ksevio · · Score: 1

    I agree! We as a civilization should be promoting things that improve our society and discourage things that harm it (though dunno your dating problems ...seems like a personal issue).

  34. Bunny or frier, same thing by drnb · · Score: 1

    Why is a cow's life worth more than a cute bunny's?

    The same cute rabbit is called either a bunny or a frier depending only on the buyer's intent.

  35. So... by DarrellBFI · · Score: 1

    ...not meat that looks and tastes like meat. I guess if the ethical conundrum of meat consumption is what drives you to be a vegetarian, I can see how this would be welcome.

    --
    Social Media Mgr at Bluefield Identity
  36. Learning we eat animals when young ... rationality by drnb · · Score: 1

    I think if a few more kids saw an animal being killed it would make a big difference)

    Yes, there would be fewer vegetarians. It is only the hiding of the natural cycle of predation that causes some adults to be disgusted and turn vegetarian. Learning that we eat animals at a young age leads to more rational adults. Now some of these rational adults may still turn vegetarian but they will more likely be motivated by health aspects than squeamishness. Squeamishness is a result of being sheltered and separated from the realities of nature.

    Think of history for a moment, over the millennia of farming where young children saw fowl and livestock turned into dinner. What effect did that reality have on them? To go vegetarian, no. More likely is to be thinking "this is going to taste good" and they do their chore of plucking the chicken for Mom.

    Hell, vegetarianism due to squeamishness is a very modern phenomena even in towns and cities. We are only a small number of decades removed from taking a whole chicken home for dinner. Plucked and partially processed but it still unmistakably looked like a chicken to any young children seeing it and Mom having to removed the inner organs was a common sight too. I recall seeing this at my Grandmother's. Did I want to stick my hands in there to remove the heart, liver, etc ... no icky ... did I sit down at the table and think yummy. You bet I did.

  37. How incredibly wasteful. by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    Meat is healthy. Processed vegetables are not only unhealthy but destructive to the environment.

    This is just so sad.

    1. Re:How incredibly wasteful. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Come on, you make that statement and there's no link? Inquiring minds what to know!

    2. Re:How incredibly wasteful. by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      Humble apologies.

      1. https://medium.com/@drewfrench/grass-fed-beef-the-most-vegan-item-in-the-supermarket-8c46b45a0d47

      2. https://www.regenerative.com/magazine/six-problems-monoculture-farming

      3. http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/monoculture-crops-environment/

      I could go on.

    3. Re:How incredibly wasteful. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Sounds like some of the same concerns from the past. The third link, at the bottom they tell us not to eat meat.

      Real bitch around where I live. I work with a local farm in Maryland. Turns out there is no place that we can take cattle around here, we have to drive around 2 hours to a place near Baltimore. Even though there is a local place for deer if I shot it. It's not a commercial place or some FDA garbage regulation.

      Thanks for the links.

  38. You haven't tasted farm raised bacon by drnb · · Score: 1

    Food preparation is not sport, its part of sustenance. Slaughtering livestock is an ordinary part of 10,000 years of farming.

    If you have problems killing the pig it only tells me one thing. You haven't tasted farm raised bacon.

  39. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

    Nope, I always specify B12. All of the other B vitamins are available from plant sources, but B12 is not and the other B vitamins are not a substitute for B12. B12 is only reasonably available to humans by eating animals, unless you like eating poop like rabbits, gorillas, and pigs do.

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. TLDR by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    But I loved the comment "Maybe you need to do some work on your parser."

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  42. I like meat by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    I like eating meat, I don't eat a lot of it, but I do like some meat with my meals. My wife is almost a vegan (again) but bacon is her one weakness. I find food without a meat portion to be bland and unfulfilling. That's my choice, just as it's my wife's choice to no longer eat meat. I don't give a fuck if the cow takes up more space, it also produces more poop and contributes to the glue you use to stick your kids poster to something. I can also wear it on my feet (the leather, not the steak, or the whole cow). How about finding a substitute for decent leather, there are NONE that come close.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  43. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Sorry, that is wrong.
    I mentioned plenty of B12 sources in my post.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  44. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Which institude of Havyed do you mean? Perhaps you should direct your frustation more specifically?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  45. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    The more you take, the more the body 'forgets' how to absorb it.
    Vitamin supplements are a double edged sword. As soon as you are not on them, e.g. while traveling, your body needs weeks to adapt to get them again out of fruits or other food.
    I can understand that people in a cold climate take them in winter, but during normal weather periods no one should take vitamin supplememts. They are unnecesary and counterproductive.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  46. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    No, they don't.
    And vegan != vegetarian anyway.
    E.G. 'vegetarians' might still eat cheese, eggs or drink milk.

    Anyway, as I pointed out, there are plenty of plants that support the body with B12.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  47. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Yes, e.g. the yeast bacteria, depending if you want to call it a bacteria or a 'mushroom' ;D

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  48. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

    Veganism has rotted your brain and destroyed your reading comprehension*. You did not mention a single source of vitamin B12 in your post. None of those things are natural sources of B12. Not a single one of them.

    Let's hear it from the US National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements: "Vitamin B12 is naturally found in animal products, including fish, meat, poultry, eggs, milk, and milk products. Vitamin B12 is generally not present in plant foods" (https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminB12-HealthProfessional/#h3).

    *Not surprising considering a vegan diet is so low in readily bio-available nutrients necessary for good brain function including vitamin B12 (cf. https://www.psychologytoday.co...)

  49. Re:This could help the environment by danbert8 · · Score: 1

    Most plants for ethanol use in the USA are grown locally. Except in markets where it has to be imported like Florida. But the reason cattle farms are in the Amazon is because they got displaced from other regions by biofuel production for the Brazilian market... https://globalforestatlas.yale...

    At least they are using sugar cane which is more efficient than corn.

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  50. Re:It's not for you. by sexconker · · Score: 1

    It's for people who refuse to consider anything that doesn't taste like meat. You may legitimately not be one of them, but they are *extremely* common which is why so much money is being poured into this market now.

    Why not just let them eat meat?

  51. How can you have any pudding... by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    ... if you don't eat your meat.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  52. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 2

    Sorry, terrible advice. And you seem to be conflating B12 and D (which is from sunshine). I don't understand why you'd avoid B12 in the summer. One thing in veganism is certain: those who make the bold step of skipping B12 supplements become ill, and change their tone a few years later and are fine once taking a regular supplement.

  53. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    Yeast is single celled, but it's not a bacterium, and while yeast makes B-vitamins, none of the yeast strains make any B12.

    You can buy yeast in the store with B12, but that's because it's been added by the manufacturer.

  54. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    Anyway, as I pointed out, there are plenty of plants that support the body with B12.

    Name one plant that makes B12, and provide a link to nutrition data please.

  55. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I already did name 20, 5 posts back.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  56. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    700 million people in the world live vegetarian, and most of them have no problem with B12 or lack there off. You just fell into the american lie about B12 is only in meat.

    Why don't you make up your mind, if the topic interests you, and read a book about it.

    Facepalm ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  57. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I gave about 10 - 20 sources of B12 in my previous post.

    "Vitamin B12 is generally not present in plant foods"
    Does not mean: not at all

    I gave several plants that contain B12 ... now step off my lawn.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  58. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

    You listed a bunch of plants that produce others of the B vitamins but not B12. You gave no plants that contain B12, not a single one, because there are none. The only way plant foods have B12 is if it is added by a manufacturer or if the manure used for fertilizer isn't washed off (and then the B12 is in the manure on the vegetable, not in the vegetable). This is not controversial science. Plants do not produce B12. Harvard's nutrition scientists say it too: "B12 is only found naturally in animal products" ( https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/n... ).

    Your confusion on this probably arises from the mentally debilitating malnutrition inherent in a vegan diet.

  59. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    They get accidental insects in their grains. So even small amounts of meat are enough to keep you from dying. If you eat strictly vegetables you end up getting sick and dying.
    Of course thinking may be difficult for modern humans also, since the brain is made from cholesterol and that is now something that people have stopped eating and giving to their growing offspring.

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  60. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by mi · · Score: 1

    We as a civilization should be promoting things that improve our society and discourage things that harm it

    This implies, that someone — some governmental body — knows, what is good and what is harmful for the rest of us. Contrary to what you may have been led — and even leading others — to believe, there is no such body.

    For one example, allow me to remind you of the horrendously ill-fated and ill-conceived "War on Fat" — a completely misguided endeavor, likely responsible for millions of obesity cases in the US alone.

    Individuals may make whatever choices they prefer and trust whoever they choose to trust, but the authority of the government must never again be allowed to suggest us, what to eat.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  61. The future. Imitation everything. by edris90 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to a future where what looks like a chair is really a garbage disposal, what looks like vitamins is really rat poison, what looks like meat is really reconstituted soy conglomerate. You looking for mouthwash ?grab the bottle with the label that says furniture polish? The one that says mouthwash is toilet cleanser. We won't rest until nothing is what it appears to be.

  62. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by Ksevio · · Score: 1

    Well we know that global warming has a detrimental effect on the planet.

    We also know that livestock contribute around 14% of emissions that cause global warming
    Reducing live stock consumption would therefore reduce climate change.

    Individuals cannot be trusted to do the right thing for the greater good - we've seen again and again that people will do what they want.

    Additionally, there is a government body that knows what is good and harmful. It's called the FDA. The FDA has been very effective at stopping food borne illnesses and helping people have safe eating habits.

  63. EWWWW... by iq145 · · Score: 1

    Sounds nasty. But remember: "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, the whole world would be vegetarian." - Linda McCartney

  64. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    If you eat strictly vegetables you end up getting sick and dying
    False.
    Beer contains B12, Sauerkraut does, Carrots do - at least organic grown ones - and I bet most roots like radish and potatoes do as well (organic grown food grows on different soil bacteria, they produce B12 [amoung other things] and the roots of the plants absorb it). Kelp does, asian people like kelp, fermented Soy does, actually it is believed that nearly all fermented "dishes" contain noticeable amounts of B12 (because yeast produces B12, so that would include wine and sake, and traditional made bread, that is bread made from sourdough see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ).

    And most importantly: mushrooms contain more B12 than meat, except for liver.

    Plenty of nuts, especially almonds and peanuts contain B12.

    And bottom line: the amount of B12 the body needs is so absurdly low and the storage capacity of your liver so absurdly high: you easy last 2 or 3 years before you would notice anything if you actually would not take in any B12 during those 2 - 3 years.

    In other words: go to the cinema and eat a pack of peanuts and you are set for month. Or eat an asian vegetarian dish with peanuts :D

    Anyway, I'm not a vegetarian or vegan. I'm just pissed about the wrong information in america where web sites claim only meat contains B12. What about fish?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  65. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    âpâYou should try to not mislead the poor idiots who might stumble across your shitpost.â/pââbrâ âquoteâAlthough mushrooms are not high in B12, they are still the only non-animal fresh food source of B12. â/quoteâ âpâFrom a quick seach, https://www.australianmushroom...â/pâ âpâThe rest of your âoeinfo" sounds just as solid, so I won't bother wasting my time.â/pâ

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  66. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by mi · · Score: 1

    Individuals cannot be trusted to do the right thing for the greater good

    Found an Authoritarian... So I can not be trusted, and therefore it is Ok to compel me. All for the Greater Good[TM] — because common interest before self-interest, correct?

    there is a government body that knows what is good and harmful. It's called the FDA

    Yes, and only a few years ago the FDA were telling us, we should not eat fat and cholesterol. And now the same organizations tell us it was all wrong. "Healthy habits" my tail — Western world is horribly obese because we trusted the government, that "fat is bad".

    helping people have safe eating habits

    That's what parents are for. Parents might know better, than their children. The government does not know better than we do, it does not consist of omniscient selfless and benevolent wizards. Government officials have the same passions, flaws, and vices as the rest of us. Working for NASA does not make anyone more credible than working for Exxon-Mobil.

    You can choose to trust someone else at your own peril, but your Authoritarian insistence, that I trust him (and submit to him!) too makes it my peril as well. No way

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  67. Re:Now they need to shame us into buying it by Ksevio · · Score: 1

    I noticed you ignored the reasoning behind what I said - I assume you're pro-climate change? At the very least you're ignorant of its effects.

    Unless you've been living under a rock, you've probably noticed that parents often don't know well enough to provide their children with a healthy meal. You're seriously trying to say that the average parent know more about nutrition than nutritional experts? The benefit of the government is that it's made up of multiple people, so even if some of them have passions, flaws, and vices, the combination of them can be better than any of them individually. If they're making the wrong decisions, we can push our representatives to get hem to change.

  68. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Everybody has to make up his own mind about nutrition.
    The claim that B12 is only in meat is wrong.
    Period. (A no brainer: how would it end up in meat if there was no source from which it is accumulated from? Humans consist of meat, too. BTW.)

    And that is my only point.

    If you are not interested in the topic, then leave us alone, but stop insulting others.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  69. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I only listed B12 plants.

    Why would I list others?

    Plants do not produce B12.
    So mushrooms, nuts and kelp are not plants?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  70. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by robkeeney · · Score: 1

    Your brain must be really addled from B12 deficiency if you believe that.

  71. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    You might want to save that facepalm for yourself: there's a difference between vegetarian and vegan. Vegan's don't consume any animal products, where eggs and dairy are consumed by vegetarians and contain B12 (and some even consider sea life 'vegetarian'.) There is zero 'controversy' on the recommendations for vegans to supplement B12. There's a handful of individuals who dispute it, and zero have a degree in nutrition, where 100% of vegan dieticians (people who went to school and studied nutrition) agree on supplementation. You might be interested in sites like https://veganhealth.org/vitamin-b12/.

    I've only been vegan for 28yrs, and I've only read half a dozen or so books on the subject, so I know there's still a lot I can learn about vegan nutrition, especially from non-vegans like yourself, so thanks for the tip!

  72. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    The point of argument was never suplements.
    The point of argument is: only animal sources provide B12 is plain wrong.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  73. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    Where did I say animal sources are the only source of B12? The problem is the plantbased items you listed aren't *reliable* sources, so if you're actually eating those for the B12, and not supplementing, then there's a very high chance you'll end up with a B12 deficiency. You're spreading just as harmful a myth. Please refer to the link I posted, it should clear up any of your confusion. It's years of data-collecting from a vegan dietician.

    And back to your original post, tofu isn't a fermented soy, and doesn't contain B12. Again, you're confused, and probably thinking of tempeh, which also isn't a reliable source of B12. You list mostly 'fake' or at best unconfirmed sources of B12. Sorry, but anyone relying on that list would get sick.

  74. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Kelp, algae, nuts etc. *are* reliable sources.
    Again: I dont't care about vegans, if they are so braindead not to eat cheese, they have to look for themselves where to get B12 from.
    I simply loath the american way of lying about simple nutrition facts and the wide spread aceptance and repeating of thise lies on the internet.
    Meat is the only source of B12! Wrong!

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  75. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    As I'm a meat eater and beer drinker: my B12 level is just fine.
    Idiot ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  76. Re: nutrition value and environmental impact? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    haha - you're hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.