Slashdot Mirror


Seti@HOME Cracked By Aliens?

Chris L. Mason writes "The Seti@HOME website appears to have been cracked. The front page has been replaced by a picture of ALF (from the really bad comedy.) However, the perpetrators have been somewhat polite about it. A comment in the new html tells where the original page has been backed up. " Might be fixed by the time you read this, but it really happened. The story was submitted by a number of slashdot readers almost immediately. Thanks.

258 comments

  1. Good grief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hack I have heard about was completely
    harmless. It does raise issues about security
    but thats about it. I think changing the banner
    to alf is rather amusing. It was a prank.
    The real culprits as far as hacking are concerned
    should be people who do malicious damage, especially like the guy who created the CIH virus and caused misery to more than a few people with lost work, studies, books etc etc.

    You cant always interpret things as black and white so easily.
    Im sure someone at SETI had to see the funnier side of things after they worked out that their data wasnt mashed, and it also gave em a chance to find the hole and plug it before someone did attack them in anger. If they didn't see the funnier side then they need to lighten up a bit, I mean after all look at the support they've got from the internet community at large. The number of users helping them is a huge endorsement. There fore I seriously doubt the hack was done just to annoy them.

    The world would be a very boring place without the occasional prank. Prank away, but keep it harmless and if possible, helpful.

    Brad

  2. Re:Arrg by radja · · Score: 1

    I once read a short story on exactly this subject.. can't remember the author though..

    In the end the prize went to some kind of queen woman (as in queen of bees..). she won, because
    her measurements coincided the best with the ideal measurements given by the local male population.. Guess being the only female of an entire race does make you THE best female..

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  3. Re:proof by analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes

  4. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Prove your point. What was the damage done to the web site? As far as I can see NONE.
    > Now what is the positive to come out of this crack? Well now seti know they have a sercuity flaw
    > and it has probably been fixed by now.

    > So at least 1 positive thing came out of. And no negatives.

    One negative at least. I found the hacked site yesterday while trying to download a seti client. I was unable to do so... so SETI lost a day of cpu time from me (and who knows how many others?).

    In a perfect world, the hackers could have just emailed the sysadmins to tell them about the hole.

    In a less-than-perfect world, they could have left a link to the original page so that the
    site could still be used.

  5. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's back up now. Actually I laughed my ass off (for about 2 seconds.) This isn't a big deal, they could have done serious damage.

  6. Speaking of SETI - looks like SGI will beat /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 hours per unit - that's damned quick. They're going to be bypassing /. very soon.

    It's funny, MS have 500 people on it and SGI are beating them with just 90.

    1. Re:Speaking of SETI - looks like SGI will beat /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... MS doesn't make fast hardware, hell, they don't even make hardware!!! SGI on the otherhand does. Now, make a little more sense to you now?

    2. Re:Speaking of SETI - looks like SGI will beat /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft makes darn fine mice.

      Any other hardware is immaterial.

  7. Re:Hack's back? by rueba · · Score: 1

    Ok I just checked now at 5:24pm EST and the official page is back. Now a very embarrassed/upset sysadmin has to restore the system from backup (to make sure security has not been compromised). This may be funny to us, but lets spare a thought for the guy who has to do all the work;)

    --
    The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  8. Re:Arrg . . . silliness -> how about this? by yiegie · · Score: 1
    > such as searching for Mersenne (sp?) primes

    You mean like www.mersenne.org?

    AFAIK, that program also uses 'lost' cycles, and they've already got some results. (As opposed to SETI ;-)

    --

    .sigmentation fault

  9. Re:speed of light... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The speed of light isn't constant, in fact a team at MIT (or somewhere like that) slowed light down to something like 30 Mph (that's Mile per hour!!)

  10. Re:Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears that people think that all I'm worried about is security.... That isn't true. Yes, I am amused at the hack -- it's actually funny and semi-appropriate, and a nice bit of amusement... However, my concerns about the data integrity DO remain. The people who hacked this site didn't delete any data (at least that wek know of...), but what about someone else who may have got in but not even TOUCHED the web pages?

    This is why you folks who rent out your spare cycles to the "Greenpeace 'Where's Waldo?' Distributed Challenge" are so very NOT AT ALL security concious. The machine I use for critical work doesn't even have a modem in it, and there are, uh, ingenious and overlapping measures to prevent (or at least loudly proclaim) physical breaches in the system. (Even now, NSA would STILL rather pick your locks and unscrew your hard drive than screw around with crunching your password -- if you're worth bothering over.)

  11. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no, no. I knowfor a FACT that the gestation period for these aliens is 33 months. ;)

  12. Sympathy!!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he's still employed after the first successful attempt, he deserves your envy and his employers your scorn. Sympathy doesn't enter into it. Not all of us do this as a hobby, or get buttock compression therapy while on the clock, you know.

  13. That's not nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to tell someone to go kill themselves. What if he/she is right on the edge?

    1. Re:That's not nice... by Wah · · Score: 1

      if he/she is right on the edge, and a comment on /. pushes them over...my guess is they'd find a way to go that extra foot all by their lonesome selves.


      ...and just because it's a holiday and I don't have to work...
      I can think of a situation where it would be "nice" to tell someone to go kill themselves. It would be that situation where my preposterous exclamation caused them to see the craziness in their actions (the ones that caused me to tell them to take a flying leap) and perhaps change them. I can think of numerous situations where the phase "Why don't you go kill yourself" could cause bundles of sarcasm induced laughter. "Oh, I dropeed my pen" "WDYGKY" HAHAHAHAHhahahhehehehe........

      --
      +&x
    2. Re:That's not nice... by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      Evolution in action?

  14. Lighten up... No real Malicious Damage was done. by Evil+Dr.+Go · · Score: 1

    I think the stunt was really funny. The page was backed up and returned to Seti@home, so no permanent damage was done.

    I'm a little disapointed that the whole debate has generated into name calling, RC5 vs. Seti and such. I see two benefits from this Stunt.

    1. It showed the Seti SysAdmin that he/she should be more vigilant.

    2. It was a damn funny prank. I just wish I could see it.

    Too all you who think Seti is a waste of time and to those who hold it on a Pedestal.... Lighten up!

    --
    Gung Gee Fook Fei Fu - Taming the Flabby Tiger
  15. Re:Mirror? by Kevin · · Score: 1

    at 15:30 PST Alf is still there....

    --
    -- Viva FreeBSD --
  16. Point being of mirrors ? by Kajakske · · Score: 1

    What's the point of those mirrors ...
    The site still displays Alf, so all of you, go there and say hello :)
    I really doubt this is a real hack (crack), because they could really have putten back the index page.
    Also, i liked it :))))

    Long life Distributed.net. Will they hack them too ?
    :))


    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Belgium HyperBanner
    http://belgium.hyperbanner.net

    1. Re:Point being of mirrors ? by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      Actually, chances are that it _is_ a real hack. The reason it has not been fixed yet is probably due to the 4th of July. Most (all?) universities in the US are closed on the 4th of July and a large majority of people take the time to celebrate with friends and family. I'm sure it will probably be fixed sometime early on Monday.
      ---

  17. This stems from an oversimplification. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 3
    The speed of light isn't constant, in fact a team at MIT (or somewhere like that) slowed light down to something like 30 Mph (that's Mile per hour!!)


    The whole question of "If the speed of light is constant, how come it slows down in things like lenses" stems from the fact that the explanation of refraction given in high school textbooks is much simpler than what is actually going on.


    If I remember correctly (it's been a while), what happens when light passes through a transparent medium (like glass or water) is that it interacts with the electrons in the material so as to be briefly absorbed and then re-emitted in the same direction (I may be mangling this - like I said, it's been a while). This kind of interaction is logical when you think about it - a photon is a packet of coupled electric and magnetic fields, while matter is made up of charged particles (electrons and atomic nuclei [small enough to look like points to most photons]).


    The net effect of photons being absorbed and re-emitted is that the propagation of the light wave seems to slow down in the material. In actuality, the photons are still travelling at the speed of light in vacuum - they're just not travelling very far before interacting with the matter they're travelling through.


    It turns out that a very small fraction of the photons do manage to travel through the material without interacting with anything (though this drops off very sharply with distance). Someone built a device a few years ago that used this effect to take "x-rays" of peoples' hands with visible light (detecting these "ballistic" photons only; their pattern naturally varied depending on how absorbing the materials they passed through were, and was sharp because the photons hadn't scattered off of anything). Check back issues of Scientific American (or possibly Discover) for the reference.


    Recent speculation about the speed of light in vacuum not being constant stems from completely different observations, probably celestial.

  18. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A) Logically, life must be possible in the Universe. Else you would not be here. Assuming you are.

    Agreed..

    B) If life is possible here, then it is possible where ever the conditions are like the conditions here.

    This point is irrelevant, who says other life needs conditions like ours. Much the way Tux and his peguin buddies thrive in the south pole.

    C) The Sun is a normal, slightly variable G0 star in the main sequence. Slightly heavier than the
    average in heavy metals and Rare Earth metals, but that's not all that rare. Millions of stars just like it are scattered through the galaxy

    See above..

    D) Every day, we find more planets around stars we never thought could possibly have them, indicating
    that planets are very common in the Universe.

    Not everyday, but it should be quite obvious that we are not the only solar system in the universe in just using common sense. The chances of there being 9 planets in our solar system and no others in the whole of the universe is incredibly low.

    E) Given all these things, we are extremely likely to find life someday. Through SETI? Who knows? Let's find out.

    I am running seti@home right now, but seriously doubt we will find anything in our lifetime.

    F) If the Earth First! and Greenpeace and other tree-hugging wackos would quit getting in the way of
    nuclear plants and solar power stations, we would not be using any fossil fuels. All the neo-luddites can go live in caves in the dark if they wish. I prefer the taste of well-cooked steak and nice, bright electric lamps and convenient hot water. But if you disagree, that's your right. Go ahead. Quit using your computer - you don't want to waste more fuel, do you?

    Don't like 'em either.

    Finally, the art of language is one of the greatest achievements of humanity. Quit mangling it.

    One could replace "mangling" with evolving.

  19. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by maarten_delft · · Score: 1

    As a Greenpeace supporter you urge me to respond to your offense on Greenpeace.

    In Holland Greenpeace collaborates with the Dutch government to install solar energy collectors on houses of consumers. A dutch house-owner can apply for a subsidized solar collector which will cost less than half of normal prize. Thus it will be cheaper (in the long run=10 years) than buying energy from a local energy company. Thanks to Greenpeace! The project is aptly but confusingly named "Solaris". Greenpeace has a (dutch) website here.

    On nuclear power: Greenpeace may be fiercely against nuclear power (I am not), in Holland it is the government that shuts down the old plants. And the government of the Netherlands are the people themselves.

    The reason we shut the existing plants down is that old-style, colossal, complex nuclear power facilities are way too unprofitable to sustain. That is if you want to apply decent security measures.

    A lot of American people and companies and local governments are ruthless in how they exploit the country. If you want to destroy all nature in your country, eventually you'll make life for yourself uncomfortable too. No more hot water for you - no more water at all. But we in Europe wouldn't care a bit.

    --
    --[rosso bright]--
  20. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The odds may 1 billion to 1 against for Seti@home finding anything but its still a chance. To Not even look reduces that chance to 0. If you don't want to look, don't ... do something else with your spare cycles.
    That still doesn't give some teenage peckerwood the right to deface a web page just becasue they don't agree with it or think its a waste of time. I don't agree wit the Catholic Church, but I won't go and deface there sites.

    Grow up. Get an imagination.

  21. Re:Arrg . . . silliness -> how about this? by phil+reed · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, that program also uses 'lost' cycles,

    True.

    and they've already got some results.

    Also true, however they've been running for something like two years.

    (As opposed to SETI ;-)

    Everybody grants that the SETI test is an extreme long shot. However, if they are successful, the payback will be much higher.


    ...phil

    --

    ...phil
    "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  22. Re:SETI@Home not undeserving of a mild crack by phil+reed · · Score: 1

    As much as I support SETI@Home, I have to say that their web site has not been the most forthcoming or interactive. Things like distributed.net go all out to keep everyone informed of what's going on, whereas the folks at SETI@Home would go weeks or months with no status updates or anything.

    Old news. The Seti at Home people have gotten much better about posting updates - sometimes multiples per day. Take a look at their Technical News link off the main page.

    That still isn't justification.


    ...phil

    --

    ...phil
    "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  23. Re:Funny. by eriko · · Score: 1

    You haven't worked with research folks, have you?

    The PI is the guy who gets the grant, controls the research and gets his name first on the papers. He only responsible to whomever got the grant. They tend to be hard to work with.

    He won't accept "MS bug"-he'll say "Then why did you spend my money on that piece of s**t server". He won't accept that you have a day off. There will be yelling involved-talk to anyone who works as a "grant monkey"-try your local research hospital, or large tech oriented university.

    Oh-and NOBODY works hourly in a research facitlity-mainly because nobody works 40 hours.

    It's not a life I'd care to live. I've done some contract work for them, and while it paid well, I'm not eager to jump back in.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  24. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should care, where do you think all of us "uncomfortable" Americans go? Southeast Asia? Middle East? I'm betting on Western Europe..

  25. Re:I resent the racist "peckerwood" comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I resent the racist "peckerwood" comment.

  26. Arrg by CoolAss · · Score: 1

    Why hack SETI? The only purpose SETI has is to further mankind. Those who choose to hack should choose more wisely.

    1. Re:Arrg by spineboy · · Score: 1

      You assume that someone who suffers a moral deficit and hacks a non-offensive site would act in a benevolent manner and give directions on how to fix the security flaw. Such people are more likely not to act in that manner as proven by their previous actions.
      It is also possible for them to screw up and delete something important unknowlingly.
      If they want to hack, go have a hacker war and hack other hacker sites.

      --
      ..........FULL STOP.
    2. Re:Arrg by Kaufmann · · Score: 1

      It's for fun, you humourless nut. Like turning the MIT Dome into R2D2. It's not necessarily evil or harmful if it's done for fun.

      --
      To the editors: your English is as bad as your Perl. Please go back to grade school.
    3. Re:Arrg by Gary+Gnu · · Score: 1

      I thought SETI was for us to find other intelligent planets and then try to exploit them as much as possible and then try to feed these intelligent civilizations with occident-centric beliefs and values and bring them to submission. When asked why we do it our response would be that it is for our national security and what we are doing is for the good of the universe. Hey, what's good for us must be good for them too right? We might even make them try to convert to Christianity and tell them that Jesus also died for their sins.

      I wonder what would happen to the Miss Universe pageant if we discovered and started interacting with extraterristrial civilizations, I could just see Miss Universe being a scaly sextapedal creature from another satellite.



    4. Re:Arrg by Jason+Skomorowski · · Score: 1

      Read the comment on Slashdot. Apparently all you had to do was view source to find the backup.

    5. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hacking Seti@home and putting a bitmap of Alf in it's place is a wakeup call. A hackers form of 'get a life.'

    6. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was loads of fun when I heard about it.

    7. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this 'moral deficit' 'non-offensive' stuff? I find Seti@home morally offensive. Anything that's as complete a waste of time and resources as it is morally offensive to me.

      It's all a matter of point of view. And moral relativists should put up or shut up on the matter.

    8. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Examples:

      tee-vee

      tee-vee

      and

      tee-vee.

      Thank you, try again.

    9. Re:Arrg by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      Of course porn benefits mankind.

      It stimulates the development and the initial use and survival of the newest technologies, supporting them financially until they become cheap enough, or, umm, penetrate the market enough to take off into general use. And then pretend that it never happened.

      Examples? VCRs, Video cameras, streaming video...

      Some complain of the bandwidth used, as if the internet connection purchased with their dollars should take precedence, but these are the same people who will be later using and enjoying the technologies for less erotic uses.

    10. Re:Arrg by PotPieMan · · Score: 1

      Think about it. Some 15 year old kid thought it might be fun to use his "hacking" skills to make a joke. He's probably in a "hacking" ring full of immature kids just like him. It is sad, though, to see SETI hacked.

    11. Re:Arrg by VirtualAdept · · Score: 1

      You know. You're right? Tell me, where do you live? I want to spray paint your house. Just for 'fun'.

    12. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you just conviced me, I mean how could I not see it before.

      Prove your point. What was the damage done to the web site? As far as I can see NONE.
      Now what is the positive to come out of this crack? Well now seti know they have a sercuity flaw and it has probably been fixed by now.

      So at least 1 positive thing came out of. And no negatives.

      So what exactly is your problem.

    13. Re:Arrg by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      whoa, chill, it is not that bad, perhaps they wrote in a told them where the hole was but did a little joke on their way out.
      cos they (as far as it looks) have have damaged nothing but bought a humourous index page instead, and hey they even told what the other one was. i mean what would you like them to do? spend their time completely taking down some important site

      and SETI further mankind? how will it?

      by that claim, a porn site that gets some guys motor running shouldn't be hacked cos of its gonna further mankind ???

    14. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no apparent damage done. The act of beneficient hacking is actually a POSITIVE thing. If nothing else, they alerted Seti to a security flaw in their system, and I would be willing to bet they left instructions on how to fix it.

      Give the kidz a break

    15. Re:Arrg by Wah · · Score: 1

      But then who would get the joke? I don't condemn them for this (although they might have messed with more stuff behind the scenes). Telling good jokes in a vacuum is like squeezing mustard out of a turnip.

      --
      +&x
    16. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The purpose is clearly to further mankind. If they discover life on another planet, it will certainly alter a lot, and force us to think a lot differently about many things, at it may also ultimately lead to new technological advances.

      Whether there's any chance that they will actually manage to further mankind in any way, is another issue, and remains to be seen.

      As for a porn site furthering mankind... The analogy is obviously flawed, but sure, if more people spent time on getting their sexual frustrations out with porn, I'm sure the world would be a far more peaceful place :-)

    17. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But then who would get the joke?

      And if I kill someone who claims to be immortal, then it would be ok, as it would be a joke, and no one would get the joke otherwise.

      I don't condemn them for this

      But I do, and the police could.

    18. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's for fun, you humourless nut.

      This is NOT fun. Period. If the page was fun, then it would have been but on its own WWW server.

    19. Re:Arrg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The act of beneficient hacking is actually a POSITIVE thing.


      Bullshit.

    20. Re:Arrg by NodeZero · · Score: 1

      > Bullshit.

      Actually its not Bullsh*t, whoever hacked the site had a few minutes of fun and probably showed the sysadmins (through some sort of left note via text file or something) how to correct the flaw, which would have cost money to fix by having some corporate snot come and help them "secure" their site. Now if it was a Comapny website that relies on hits and clicks and money coming in from the web, then I could see the damage of the site being changed. But since its not, I see no harm done.

      What you are saying Bullsh*t to is actually the bad image of "hackers". Which would be those who hack sites and ruin them for good with no backups and no help. Those arent true hackers. And yes, they are destructive. But it is obvious that whoever did this to the Seti site was not one of those destructive immature "death to the world and your website" people.

      Just saying my peace, I hate it when people judge all hackers the same once a bad one does something wrong.

      Just my $00.02

      --
      - "My name is Legion, for we are many" -Mark 5:9
    21. Re:Arrg by radja · · Score: 1

      The purpose of seti is not to further mankind. seti is involved in a sinister plot to subjugate mankind and sell us out as slaves to an infinitely superior intelligence that contacted us in the late 1940's. The craft recovered in Rockwell was not a true craft, but rather an advanced communication satellite, that had veered out of Earth's orbit by being hit by an asteroid.
      I hope this clarifies things

      > This message brought to you by Bullshit-R-us

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  27. 555-1212 by delmoi · · Score: 1

    well, 555-1212 is a viable number, it would be more like 5B6-44C6, or 1232-1298773
    _
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  28. Who's missing the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We just dont agree that telling them theres a hole and showing them theres a hole makes much difference in what has to be done. You have to assume the machine has been compromised anyway, even if you dont _think_ its been cracked just because your frontpage is still right.

    Showing it like this just makes fixing it a little more pressing...

  29. Mirror by gashalot · · Score: 2

    I'll have a mirror up for you all at http://www.gashalot.com/setihack if anyone wants to see this and it's gone from the SETI servers.

    This is actually one of the funny website hacks that I have seen recently, instead of one that uses some 3l33t h4x0r sp34k trying to free Kevin Mitnik (or however you spell his name).

    --
    -R
  30. common here, but rare there.... by delmoi · · Score: 1

    Like what, styrofoam?

    it would probably be more cost effective to *trade* with us then to try and destroy us.
    _
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  31. probally just a joke.. by mebob · · Score: 1

    Its probally just there go at joke... It is pretty funny...

    Its indepenence day.. Alf, alien...

    --
    =1000101
  32. Mirror? by TheWall · · Score: 1
    I was sleeping and missed the whole thing. heh Did anybody mirror the page before they fixed it?

    I had forgotten about Seti@Home, come to think of it I still have a flashing icon for it on my taskbar... I'll get back to it sooner or later.

    1. Re:Mirror? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Fixed it? I saw it after seeing your comment, so you're obviously still asleep...

      I dare say they'll have a mirror up at HNN before long, though, in case you really do wake up too late.

    2. Re:Mirror? by lenthe · · Score: 1

      As of 12:50 EST Alf is still there. Better hurry!

  33. Re:Tunneling, misuse of computing power, etc. etc. by KingBob · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, if your system is so "mission critical" that any of these problems are an issue, you really shouldn't have the seti@home client running on it in the first place...

  34. Whoever they were, it was friendly by edgy · · Score: 3

    If you look at the source of the page, you can see the following:

    //---! original index.html is backed up as index.html.old !---//

    (took out greater-than and less-than signs)

    Looks like the crackers were just having a little bit of fun. I found it kind of amusing. If the page is gone, at any time later, im gonna mirror it at http://high.amvalue.com/~edgy/seti in case anyone misses it.

    1. Re:Whoever they were, it was friendly by weaselp · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly the server reports Content-type text/plain instead of text/html.

      --

      --
      Weasel
    2. Re:Whoever they were, it was friendly by gleam · · Score: 1

      If that's your definition of a friendly defacer, than there are very few graffiti artists who *aren't* friendly. Check attrition's mirrors, almost all of the defacements have, somewhere in the source or text, mention of 'mv index1.html index.html' or something akin...

      So yes, it was a funny crack, and yes, they were kind enough to be like most of the other defacers and create a backup of the index... and yes, at least it was a relevant defacement.

      Regards,
      -ehfisher

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
  35. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by acarey · · Score: 1

    Go read Drake's equation. ... Solve for 1 and see the numbers that are required, just to prove the point.

    Not possible. You can only solve an equation when you are missing only one variable. Since Drake's Equation relies on the values of 11 variables, and you're specifying one, you're left with trying to simultaneously solve for 10 independent variables. I think we can safely put that in the "too hard" basket :)

    Cheers
    Alastair

    --
    -- "I believe the human being and the fish can coexist peacefully." - George W. Bush, 29 September 2000
  36. Re:Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point -- my machines that I do sensitive work on are secured down, and only networked to each other, primarily for data sharing -- no outside connections...

    But I still want to know what they have done or will do to ensure that no data tampering takes place... If I'm going to dontate spare cycles off my non-secured machines, I want to know that it at least has a chance of being worthwhile.

    -- Blu "Where's the password?!" Knight

  37. All wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    You've got it all wrong!
    It didn't get hacked -- that's the message from outer space that they found!

  38. blaming Jews for KKK? by arielb · · Score: 1

    I think he was talking about sites that say "Burn the Jews etc". And are you saying that to stop the KKK, Jews should renounce their religion? btw there are very few atheist countries. North Korea is one of them...

    --
    ---
    1. Re:blaming Jews for KKK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Chinese constitution all citizens are guaranteed "Freedom From Religion."

      While I find many of the things the Chinese government does objectionable, that plank in the constitution has always seemed refreshing.

    2. Re:blaming Jews for KKK? by Twisted · · Score: 1

      they are also gauranteed ~Freedom from Democracy~

  39. Re:Funny. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Yes, but this is only true if you aren't diligently running tools that maintain offsite hashed indexes of the contents of your machine so you can tell if anything critical has been modified.

    Primary investigator? What planet are you on?
    The boss will want to know 'what happened'. The guy will say 'some kind changed our page to a picture of alf. He left everything else alone, i've already verified this. It was due to a bug that MS didn't reveal until yesterday, and it was my day off. It's been fixed now. NO harm done.
    That'll be 24 hours overtime.



  40. Old one still there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the source code you will see that the original page is still there, as index.html.old


    Adrian

  41. ATTENTION! SOMETHING VERY WEIRD IS GOING ON by Silex · · Score: 1

    Millville, NJ Cape May, NJ Fulshear, TX and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia all lost power today (that's all I know of). And SETI@Home was hacked by aliens.

    PLease tell me if you know of any other power failures. And be sure before you say.

  42. Never mind by TheWall · · Score: 1

    Uhm, ok. Well when I viewed the story (the first 3 times) there were no comments posted. After I submitted my post it let me view the other comments posted... heh either something was screwy or somebody read my mind.

  43. Re:Not all religions are intolerent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not hatred but fear. And let us not forget what master Yoda has taught us of fear.

  44. I remember a while back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I remember a while back /. was hacked. Did you
    guys ever find out how they gain access?

    Stephen

    1. Re:I remember a while back... by gleam · · Score: 2

      This isn't how they gained access, but it is a link to the mirror (if you want to see it).

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
    2. Re:I remember a while back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember right, it was a "feature" in portmapper. I'm not sure if an exploit was ever made public.

  45. Re:speed of light... by Cecil · · Score: 1

    The speed of light is certainly not constant, it was never claimed to be.

    It is the speed of light in a vacuum that was supposed to be constant, but I believe that is being called into question recently by new experimental evidence? (correct me if I'm wrong)

    In any case, this thread is fairly offtopic, and should end here. As for SETI@Home being cracked, this was obviously not a malicious hateful cracker. Really, it could've been a hell of a lot worse. Stop acting like it's the end of the world. It was a joke, and an easily repaired one, that surely didn't damage SETI and probably helped them out quite a bit by pointing out their security hole!

  46. Re:Hack KKK by arielb · · Score: 1

    if the KKK is so religious then why do they target Jews (a religious group) burn crosses and black churches?

    --
    ---
  47. Re:ALF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me honest:

    The show was written for cretin morons that would laugh at grass growing.

    I guess honesty IS the best policy.

  48. Re:They run Apache insecure server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot. Apache has nothing to do with it.

  49. Re:Alien Life Form! Doesn't suck. :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alf didn't suck.

    You're right. He blew.

  50. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're complaining about America? At least we don't kill off our old and sick.

  51. Re:speed of light... (slower yes, faster no) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, no can do.
    The speed of light is constant in whatever medium its in - in a vacuum the speed of light *is* 186000 miles/sec - light travels slower through other mediums, for example water (that's how *refraction* works).
    The recent news has been about forcing a beam of light to travel through an ultra-cold medium through which it can only travel very slowly - which may have some interesting applications.
    You can't speed up the "speed of light" (i.e. the speed of light *in a vacuum*) - due to the fact that you can't get a less dense medium than a vacuum itself.

  52. Re:moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you moderators for encouraging FUD by marking up woo-woo and paranoid drivel.

    you are doing your part to helping /. decline.

    congratulations.

  53. Re:speed of light... by Gary+Gnu · · Score: 1

    That is correct. Saying that the speed of light is constant is like saying that the speed of that 747 flying above me is constant and will never change.


  54. Re:Who should be fired?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter. The machine was compromised, the system must be installed. Otherwise the webmaster/sysadmin should be fired.

    If you rebuilt my 100k hit a day webserver because of one security hole that is probably know to Sun, pache, netscape or whoever, I'd fire you. Do you rebuild your entire data center because of a disk crash too, because something isn't right, I fix mine? ooohhh?

  55. Joke- on-topic, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: How many computer geeks does it take to replace a burned out light bulb?

    A: 10,000. 9,999 to search around in the dark for 'extraterresteral intelligence' and one to finally in exasperation say "what the hell are you geeks doing sitting in the dark" and replace the bulb.

  56. Re:It doesn't matter if they're out there. by Gary+Gnu · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and like Columbus, once we have found them we should rape and pillage them if they can't or haven't already destroyed us for our natural resources.

    Aliens: We must begin our landing sequence and destroy these two legged creatures so we can mine their planet for very precious sheep dung!

  57. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes more energy to produce a solar panel than the said panel will ever produce in its lifetime.

  58. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Gary+Gnu · · Score: 1

    > Finally, the art of language is one of the
    > greatest achievements of humanity. Quit
    > mangling it.

    art -
    4 a : the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic objects; also : works so produced b (1) : FINE ARTS (2) : one of the fine arts (3) : a graphic art

    He was merely using his creative imagination. To each his own I guess.....

  59. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    If there are any phenomena that leave traces in the radio signals earth receives from space (sort of what radio telescopes are for), analyzing those signals and checking out the prospects winnowed from the data is likely to reveal those phenomena.

    So, attacking the SETI problem, which (obviously) interests people enough to participate in the analysis, will IMO much more likely result in announcements of natural galactic-scale masers (or something sounding like that), than the discovery of ET. Which will greatly interest, at least, the astronomers and astronomy mavens.

    I think the term for this is marketing :-)

  60. Re:speed of light... (slower yes, faster no) by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    IIRC, the Casmir Effect - two conducting plates placed near each other, which excludes from a vaccum between the plates virtual particles with wavelengths longer than the plate separation - is one way to raise the speed of light in the affected region.

  61. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a clue: shut the machine off when you're not using it.

  62. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For cripes sake!

    Yours is the logic that watches Star Trek or Star War, or any of that crap when you should be hitting a calculus or physics textbook. If you're real, that is, and not just playing dressup with your sci-fi friends at a con.

  63. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All life is sacred. Don't you even think about swatting that biting fly. And don't get me going again on the extinction of the smallpox virus.

    I would like to see a 'dark-future' science fiction movie made where all 'non-believers' are forced to live in a hellhole of a hospital that sustains their lives until they 'repent and are saved' so they can be put out of their misery.

    Face it. You're gonna die. Don't spend your whole damn life dwelling on it.

  64. Re:It doesn't matter if they're out there. by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    Destroy humans to protect sheep?

    Now thatwould be ignoring symbiosis!

  65. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're referring to doctor-assisted suicide, you got the wrong idea. "we don't kill off our old and sick", we simply allow people who are suffering in pain with a terminal illness to end their suffering in peace and dignity, *only with their consent*

  66. Re:proof by analogy by Kaufmann · · Score: 1

    If you think the hack was funny and/or harmless, then there is no reason to go off like a lunatic trying to kill the invaders off just because they were able to get into your computer. The fact is, it's always going to be possible to do that in one way or the other (whether just through technical expertise or through such techniques as social engineering); it's better to have "good" hackers do this, do no harm and point out the security hole, than to have crackers do this and force you to change the root password and bring the site back up from backups.

    --
    To the editors: your English is as bad as your Perl. Please go back to grade school.
  67. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you mysteriously run out of aluminum foil on what you KNEW was an especially important day to be wearing a protective hat, you have to do far more than just go to the grocery and buy three extra large rolls of aluminum foil. . .

  68. You know, sometimes I get up early on Saturday... by hunterotd · · Score: 1

    for other reasons, of course. Long about 9:00 or 10:00 I turn on the TV in hopes of finding some really cool cartoons on. However, I find some sports shows, some Saved By the Bell-ish shows (talk about the worst show of all time) and a whole bunch of Infomercials. What's happened? What will the children of tomorrow do about cartoons? They will be deprived of so many wasted Saturday mornings.

    --
    . when in danger or in doubt, run in circles scream and shout --Robert Heinlein
  69. Re:Seti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep,

    And the truth hurts at Seti@home

  70. Re:Who should be fired?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you should warn your customers of the tremendous risk involved in having any online presence of the cash sort. Then the ethical thing to do would be to go out of business. But that wouldn't sell space on the server, would it?

  71. Did you miss the crack on the Seti@home web page? by Crash_Bandit · · Score: 1

    Well when I went to the Seti@home web page I found that they had all ready put the normal web page back. So then I went to 2600 at www.2600.com the place to find all the web pages that have been cracked, all thought I don't recommend it for someone under 18 'cause some of the hacked site they show show it all if you get what I mean. Also I don't agree with the people who cracked Seti@home when they could crack some site that is worth hacking like the nazi, kkk, porn site, any anti religion site, Microsoft (he he just kidding, but then again maybe not) or any other site that is like that. chow (^_^)

    --
    When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to reform. --Mark Twain
  72. Alien Life Form! Doesn't suck. :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I'm sure Alf hopped on his PowerBook G3, beamed up to their web server, replaced their front page... All to prove that their efforts were going to good use. Hmm.

    And, Alf didn't suck. :-P

    JR

  73. Re:Hack's back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why feel sorry for him for that reason.

    I feel sorry for him (her?) because of the waste of time and effort the whole Seti project is. They're obviously sincere about the effort, and I can't help but think they'd be more gratified in the long run if they were doing something actually useful to somebody more than the power utilities who get to sell more electricity to idealistic geeks.

  74. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by OkToGo · · Score: 1

    People have the right to express their opinions on topics, to be sure. But hacking sites is just wrong, and downright infantile. There are vast forums available to issue protests in legally, without resorting to illegal methods.

    As for finding anything by looking at noise, of course I expect them to find something! How can they find it if they don't listen? The odds may be no better than winning the lottery, but you can't win if you don't play!

    seti@home is a beautiful concept. My computer has millions of spare cycles per day that would otherwise be wasted. So, I am not wasting fossil fuel, I am putting it to good use. And hundreds of thousands of other people feel the same way. The possiblility of the greatest discovery in the history of humankind...hmm, let's see...do I want to be a part of it? Hell yeah!

  75. Racist? by hunterotd · · Score: 1

    I know that I'm not the most up to date with popular culture. Therefore, I would appreciate it if you would explain how "peckerwood" is racist? Please do not respond to this post, but rather email it to me. I have a feeling that it won't be suitable for a public forum such as this

    --
    . when in danger or in doubt, run in circles scream and shout --Robert Heinlein
  76. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he meant things like the remarkable lack of medical treatment for the elderly some countries, for example kidney dialysis?

  77. Re:The evening news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It grows like a fungus in the dark!"

    "It could be growing inside you!"

    "Look, there it is! " (screech)



    get real

  78. Re:hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Score:2, Funny)

    What is this, Mad Magazine?

  79. Re:Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be doing more than worrying.

    You should huff off to get a new hard drive (they could have hacked the partitions), a new bios for your motherboard if it's a flash chip, and thirty-seven-and-a-half other protective measures, just like all the 'admins' are saying the site itself should be doing.

    You should especially be doing all of this stuff if you're the gullible sort of person who takes SETI@home seriously.

  80. Re:Hack's back? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    You know, it would be rather nice if the SETI project would now distribute a utility to check if people are running the SETI client or a hacked copy of what they thought was the SETI client.

  81. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by ashp · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to cause offense here, but have you stopped to remember that old people are *meant* to die. It's how life works. You get born, you breed, then you die.

    Keeping old people in a world of pain for what amounts of purely selfish reasons is wrong.

  82. ALF by NateKid · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know if there's a copy of the hacked website posted anywhere? My proxy won't let me go to www.2600.com and see if a copy's been posted there (I might get fired for checking) and I'd love a picture of Alf for my desktop wallpaper.

    1. Re:ALF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, Lynn was pretty cute. :)

    2. Re:ALF by zztzed · · Score: 1

      I'll admit it. ALF was one of my favourite TV shows... when I was five years old.

  83. They run Apache insecure server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their webserver is Apache/1.3.6 which explains everything.

  84. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Twisted · · Score: 1

    Even when it's just to go to the toilet ? Or make a cup of coffee ? Or answer the phone ?

  85. Hmm, the image is still there. by CraigMcPherson · · Score: 1

    The page is fixed, but the alf.jpg is still right where it was. I can't really think of why they might have left it there. It DOES mean that they most likely DIDN'T do a full restore of the site from a backup, as someone earlier said they might.

    This really could be a hoax or some other kind of "sanctioned" event. I bet, at the least, they're laughing about it; if they regarded it as a serious threat I doubt they would have left an image file in their root www directory that someone else had put there.

    1. Re:Hmm, the image is still there. by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      hell yea, perhaps it was an inside job, and just made it on the 4th to be funny

  86. Who gave you that idea? by Michel · · Score: 1
    And are you saying that to stop the KKK, Jews should renounce their religion?

    Ofcourse not. That doesn't make sense, it doesn't work that way. All I said was that religion promotes ignorance, and quite often hate as well. At least christianity does, and that's where the KKK come from.

    Now before you start jumping down my neck, I'm not saying that all christians are KKK's, far from it, but there's no denying that the KKK is based on christianity.

    And where did you get this jews stuff from anyway? I see absolutely nothing about jews in either my post or the one I was replying to.

  87. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al Gore.

    almost exactly 9 months........ Hmmmmmm

  88. Re:It doesn't matter if they're out there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    especially since they give us lotsa sheep for trinkets

  89. Re:Security Concerns by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by rdobbs:

    The data that is being sent out is prone to corruption. However, it doesn't really affect the project as the packet, once returned, is compaired to the original data and checked for integrity.

    If it don't fit - the datagram is tossed, and the packet is resent to another client for reprocessing. SETI has the original telescope radio data somewhere offsite - because if they didn't, the whole project would have been destroyed years ago...

  90. Re:Arrg . Greenpeace against solar energy?? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    Of course old people die. Age is an incurable condition, so far. Duh! I would not argue that if, fully informed of what treatment is or is not effective for a possibly fatal condition, and offered it they should not have the option to choose death instead.

    Perhaps from an evolutionary perspective, "You get born, you breed, you die" is all that is important. But this logic indicates persons who are sterile, women who have reached menopause, and so on should be excluded from public health programs. Morally, I reject this eugenics approach.

    In human society a person's contributions can extend for their entire lives. They do not become of less worth to society as they age, and limiting the choices available for them is as objectionable as any genocide based on discrimination by sex, race, et cetra. But excluding them from treatment is no better than murder being excused by other conditions they may have.


    "Selfishness"? Give me a break. Goodness, the money saved by excluding the sick elderly from treatment using your excuses, and the inheritances transferred more quickly to their heirs, just seem terribly convenient, don't they? What an amazingly convenient, cost-saving coincidence. Not.

  91. Re:Seti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, it's more like someone who uses a hammer and chisel to destroy the deadbolt on your door, then leaves the door open for the entire neighborhood to see, and puts a flashing neon sign "idiot lives here".

  92. At least they didn't wipe it clean... by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by JPFunk:

    They moved the original index.html to index.html.old, so at least they were nice about the hack. Amusing, anyway...

    1. Re:At least they didn't wipe it clean... by triple6 · · Score: 1

      Of course, it would have been nicer to have moved the old copy to index-old.html, so it could still be used in the meantime.

    2. Re:At least they didn't wipe it clean... by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      adding index.html.old works for me

    3. Re:At least they didn't wipe it clean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a link perhaps?

  93. Okay gotta explain myself by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Napalm4u:

    Okay i agree maybe people would see the kkk site more. I have many people in my family who faught the nazis during ww2. Alright?, I hate these Bastards! Hate is tearing apart this country, just the other day there were shootings in chicago, during the bombing of kosovo there was a string of firebombings in LA of Jewish Temples.

    This country makes me sick. Everyone here thinks that the constitution says they have the right to do all this crap. The other day i saw that there was a Neo-Nazi protest somewhere in the south. I can't believe that, all those flags and pictures of Hitler. A man that killed is directly or indirectly responsible for 26 million dead russians and postilby 100 million more dead.
    Why?

    About the anti religion sites: I mean all those Anti Islam, Anti Hindu places.

    I used my post to say that I hate all kinds of oppression.

    This planet sickens me, i dunno maybe i'm just bitter

  94. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by jevig · · Score: 1

    I am not meaning to say that humans will never find aliens, it is just that with our current technology the only ones that we would find are the ones that want to be found and we would not need seti@home for them.

  95. Re:moron. by Atilla · · Score: 1

    Finally :)

    someone with common sense...

    If some of you are that paranoid, run TCP dump on a machine while it's xmitting SETI@Home data...
    And please, dont turn /. into The Globe or some crap like that :)

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  96. go away, troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well people like you helped cut SETI funding so they cant afford to hire 24/7 staff.

    moron. shoo. go away.

  97. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by jevig · · Score: 1

    I beleive that the cracker wants to show that SETI@home is silly, just like ALF. Do you really expect to find anything by looking at white noise? I am all for the progress of humankind but is this really doing anything more than wasteing fossil feuls.

  98. Re:come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but it wasnt funny. it was infantile.

  99. Wish more cracks were like this by grib · · Score: 1

    It's still not at all nice, but it's much better than 1 0wn u sh0\/\/ts 2 fuDpack0r and syb0rpHag3 ha ha ha.


    --
    An Object at rest CANNOT BE STOPPED! -The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight
  100. Re:Did you miss the crack on the Seti@home web pag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    95%+ of hacks are what you would call script kiddie attacks. These use pre-made exploits on rootshell.com or "social engineering" methods like calling up tech support and cliaming to have forgotten the password to the system. The rest are done by attacking custom cgi's on the system *somewhat difficult) or maybe breaking into other systems on the same segment and running a password sniffer on there to capture passwords for the target system.

  101. Funny. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's a funny way of saying 'Your site is insecure?'
    The original site, as they say, was backed up. Restoring it is probably a matter of 'mv backup/* .'
    no big deal. Kinda funny.

    1. Re:Funny. by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      nah, easyier than that. all they need to do is to rename index.html.old back to index.html, nothing else has seemed to be effected

    2. Re:Funny. by eriko · · Score: 3

      Unfortunatly, not. If you site gets cracked, you can't assume anything on the machine is safe-you need to wipe it, reinstall, apply every patch that you can find, and then grovel over a backup of the hacked site to see if you find a new hole. It's an enormous PITA.

      It may be funny to the joker who decided to post it, and it does seem harmless, but the sysadmin who runs that machine has just found himself with a minium 48 hour job-and then, of course explaining to the boss-no, the Primary Investigator, what the hell happened, and why he didn't stop it.

      (The PI is the guy who got the grant. They are not noted for thier sense of humor-or proportion)


      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    3. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On the other hand, that's what you should do if you find a hole anyway - never assume the hole hasn't been exploited.

      The real danger aren't the people who change your front page. It's the people who gain access, and keep it quiet, and use their access without raising a suspicion.

      If you just close a hole, without a full audit, you're likely still susceptible to being taken down... HARD.

      And the worst part is that if you really think you're safe just because you close a hole, and nobody has changed your homepage yet, you'll be a damn lot less alert.

    4. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, anyone serious who exploits a hole will usually patch it to keep others out. At least one daemon will usually be modified to allow remote access. Tripwire is the sysadmin's best friend!

      Take a look at this article from Phrack called Weakening the Linux Kernel. They have code for a loadable module which will hide itself along with starting several backdoors on the system. Go down about 1/2 way to see the full feature list. The #include files are hidden because of the html interperter. You can see them by viewing the source or saving the file.

  102. Re:Worrying by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    How exactly are the myriad users of the Windows versions going to do this thing?

  103. ALF by metalman · · Score: 2

    Excuse me, Alf was one of my favorite shows!

    And I think that anyone else out there who is being honest would admit that too..

  104. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by drudd · · Score: 1

    How are we wasting fossil fuels by simply capturing cpu cycles which would otherwise be wasted on NOP's? It's a far more egregious waste of energy to have the countless PC's which are on for say 15 minutes while their users go grab a cup of coffee to simply sit and do nothing productive!

    Admittedly the SETI project (note that it is currently a test, and not really geared to a large scale survey) has little prospect of finding signals from intelligent life. Does this mean we should never look?

    How wasteful would it be for the human race to have missed its one opportunity for contact with an alien civilization, simply because we were too bullheaded to even listen!

    drudd

    --
    Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
  105. Re:Who should be fired?!? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    As a Sysadmin I would have no trouble with this. Of course, you would have to accept a CYA memo from myself, recommending the rebuild, noting the possible damage and liability, and releving me from any responsibility for your decision to do otherwise.

  106. Re:Lighten up, ok? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    If they left the car where it was, but changed the presets on the radio to Country & Western stations - now that would be malicious.

  107. Re:It doesn't matter if they're out there. by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    Hey, if they make us prosperous, humans will follow them anywhere.

    And bite them, of course, as Mark Twain observed.

  108. Very funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wanted a jpg of Alf for my desktop.

  109. Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    This raises, at least in my mind, concerns over the integrity of the data that SETI@Home is sending out... Remember the fiasco about duplicate data? And now their webserver gets hacked...

    What's to say that their data server hasn't been hacked, and random sections deleted, or tainted?

    -- BluKnight, who forgot his password

    1. Re:Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, are you afraid that somebody wants to search for Gaussian spikes in your password file ?

    2. Re:Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As paranoid as it may sound, some organizations may or may not be working for or against SETI - either by falsifying reports of good data, or taking out anything that might indicate alien life. A few months ago, I would have dismissed a theory like this as pure bullshit, but after reading about Eschalon, I'm not so sure anymore.

    3. Re:Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that people think that all I'm worried about is security.... That isn't true. Yes, I am amused at the hack -- it's actually funny and semi-appropriate, and a nice bit of amusement...

      However, my concerns about the data integrity DO remain. The people who hacked this site didn't delete any data (at least that wek know of...), but what about someone else who may have got in but not even TOUCHED the web pages?

      There is a lot of damage that could be done to a project like this with an insecure machine, my friends. True, their primary data server MAY NOT have been hacked... But the possibility does exist, and I for one wonder if there is some mechanism in place to react to that, whether each block is checksummed and checked to make sure it is completed, or what?

      -- BluKnight, who STILL doesn't remember his password.

    4. Re:Security Concerns by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      The concern would be that someone would come in and insert a message into one of the data sets that is still to be processed. If you remember the uproar in the novel CONTACT when the first message decoded was Hitler's televised broadcast at the Berlin Olympics. I imagine there are groups out there that would like to ensure that this fictional account becomes a reality.

    5. Re:Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You raise an interesting point... However, we may be missing previous chunks of data and not know it yet.

      As memory serves, and I know I'm not up on my technical history... The Berlin Olympics broadcast WAS one of the first video transmissions with significant power. So it is possible, I think, that an ETI would be able to recieve it, add data to it, and send it back, just as Sagan postulated.

      However, I find it highly unlikely, personally... TV, at least IMHO, is way too bandwidth intensive for my tastes. I would take some radio signal, capture it at, say, 22kHz mono.... and double the data rate, using the extra bandwidth to intersperse noise that wouldn't destory the signal, but actually convey data... Kind of like Steganography, but with an audio signal instead of a data signal.

      -- BluKnight, the passwordily confused.

    6. Re:Security Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The security of this site appears to be far from ideal. A basic scan shows that many ports appear to be open.

      The website appears to be running without any form of firewall. Probably a very easy crack.

  110. Re:Arrg... perhaps Gordon Schumway knows... by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 1

    The alternate text for the alf image says "Gordon Schumway"... I wonder if Gordon knows the hacker (or is the hacker, though probably less likely).

  111. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Chocboy · · Score: 1

    RC5 cracking is something which makes use of the unused cpu cycles. and that has some real use

  112. Pure Comedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHA! Now that's humor! 8-)

    To me, this appears as though there's no bad intentions intended...

    --Chris, chris@ntr.net

    1. Re:Pure Comedy! by jwhyche · · Score: 1

      bwahaha! That was funny. I take SETI very seriously and I almost feel out of my chair.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  113. Re:Arrg... perhaps Gordon Schumway knows... by Chocboy · · Score: 2

    most likely, seeing as Gordon Schumway is Alf's name on his home planet.
    perhaps Alf and ET got on their computer (which according to ID4 is compatible with the Mac) and thought they might drop some hints...
    have they logged their ip? cos it could be past 255 (like in the movie 'the net').
    0-255 reserved for earth, and the rest for the aliens... :P

  114. Re:Arrg... perhaps Gordon Schumway knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gordon Schumway was ALF's real name, on his home planet of Melmac.
    Isn't it sad that I remember that ?

  115. ANOTHER MIRROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be mirroring this at http://www2.truman.edu/~u789/alf/ if anyone wants to see it.

  116. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And what would that be ? RC5 has outlived it's usefulness. It proved that rc5-56 could be cracked in a reasonable amount of time and that, by logical extension, all crypto was crackable. Nobody doubts that 64bit will eventually fall, and that the time to crack it will lessen to a point when it will eventually be crackable in a practical timeframe. Bovine fought the good fight, fought hard and WON. Now it's time to move on.

  117. Re:Seti by Chocboy · · Score: 1

    you are the one comparing him/her to a terrorist..
    what i would compare him to is a humourous poster on a door. cos if you look around you'll see that nothing else has seemed to be effected

  118. Really a crack? by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 1

    Was the site really cracked? I would expect the site would have been fixed by now if that was actually the case (of course, they might all just be sleepyheads over in Berkeley.. ;-)

    Maybe it's just a publicity stunt or whatever..

  119. Re:Seti by Chocboy · · Score: 1

    whoops, i meant i'd compare him/her to someone who puts a poster on a door. and they also had enuff decincy(sp?) to tell us where the orig is

  120. Hack's back? by Snarl · · Score: 1

    I went to the homepage and now ALF's back.

    Did they hack the page again?

    1. Re:Hack's back? by TheWall · · Score: 1

      You're right. I went this morning (9 am PST) and the page was normal, but I went back now (2pm PST) and ALF's back. Maybe it was hacked again... or maybe my ISP is running through a proxy server and had the unhacked page cached.

  121. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by jevig · · Score: 1

    The waste of fossil feul that I am referring to is from people who leave there computer on overnight all the time. Also what were they trying to test? If people would use the program, if their servers could handle the load generated, or what.

  122. Alf is not a bad comedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alf subscribes to a cat-lovers magazine because he thinks it might contain recipes. How can go wrong with a show like that? Kinda the innocent comedy that we're missing these days.

    The hack is really creative. Hehe

  123. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Chocboy · · Score: 1

    to crack 64 as you said. but looking at noise in space, i'm yet to see the point in that?

  124. Concratulations by segmentation+fault · · Score: 0

    Why do you give the crackers what they want? There's no news value in this story anyway, everyone have seen cracked sites before.

    --
    -segfault
    1. Re:Concratulations by Kajakske · · Score: 1

      It is just fun ...
      Nothing more, nothing less ...
      If u need they old page, it is still there !!!


      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
      Belgium HyperBanner
      http://belgium.hyperbanner.net

  125. Sound Effect: Loud Raspberry by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    Yuk yuk. Now put the original home page back, please.

    1. Re:Sound Effect: Loud Raspberry by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      i'm sure they will anyway, just add index.html.old to their url at it'll be surfing as usual

  126. Yet another mirror by Tillman · · Score: 2

    http://www.pinball.nu/setihack/index.html

    Enjoy

  127. Hack KKK by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Napalm4u:

    Why don't they do something constructive and hack the assholes on the KKK site???? White power, nazi, and anti any religion sites should all be hacked!

    This pisses me off!

    1. Re:Hack KKK by Trojan · · Score: 1

      That would only generate unnecessary publicity.

    2. Re:Hack KKK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is nice, now go away.

    3. Re:Hack KKK by Eric+Savage · · Score: 1

      Why? Because they preach intolerance and stereotypes and want to infringe on other's rights to free speech and free thought?

      Perhaps only the sites of hypocrites should be hacked?

      --

      This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
    4. Re:Hack KKK by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by kenmcneil:

      Wow...so we should respect everyone's right to free speech except the people we disagree with? That is what you are implying and I have to disagree. Even if you and the rest of the world believe that a groups views are wrong, you should be mature enough to either listen or simply ignore them. There is absolutly no need to attack them. Though I personally think that the groups you referred to don't have a positive influence on society, there are too many examples of when a person or group has been persicuted because of beliefs that were later accepted.

    5. Re:Hack KKK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Personally, I'd prefer it if all religious sites would be hacked instead of the anti-religious sites.

      It's religion that's been supporting KKK and a high percentage of all hate groups for centuries.

      Not to mention corrupting millions of people, and serving as a focal point for censorship fanatics.

      On the other hand, I'm against all censorship. Whether it's against groups I like or dislike.

      But harmless hacks like the one against SETI@home can be fun. And it can also be a way to make a statement.

      As long as it's non-destructive (i.e. the SETI@home prank where they took a copy of the old page), and they don't destroy anyones livelyhood, it's not that bad.

  128. Animated Alf show was great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody else remember the Saturday morning cartoon of Alf? It was set up like repertory theater. Each show would have a frame story on Melmac and then the characters would "act" in another story. It was great. I wonder if it will come out on DVD.

    1. Re:Animated Alf show was great by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      yea, that was cool, along with muppets and all the other cool shows (in NZ at least) that gave us good reasons to get up early every saturday morning... now theres no reason to turn ya TV on.

      oh.. i mean no, i don't have a clue what you're talking about :p

    2. Re:Animated Alf show was great by Old+Stoner · · Score: 1

      Ahh the lost youth...I remember (when the random firing neurons connect) The Sat am ritual wake n bake before PeeWee's playhouse...then more recently Reboot

      Those were the days...pass me that bong!!!

      -Old Stoner

  129. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No fun in the noise, but on the off chance we actually do FIND anything, I don't think I really need to go into all the potential benefits to mankind do I ?

  130. Re:Arrg... perhaps Gordon Schumway knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK Alf's last name is spelled "Shumway". That spelling error might uncover the cracker as a German....

  131. distributed.net by ViGe · · Score: 1


    Bovine fought the good fight, fought hard and
    WON. Now it's time to move on.


    You are definitely right. Cracking rc5 isn't really useful any more, since the point has already been made. Looking for aliens isn't much more useful, at least when seti@home send the same blocks to many clients.. Distributed.net should find something new to do - OGR sounds nice. But the fact is that we started cracking rc5 - and I like finishing what I've started.
    --

    --
    It has to work - rfc1925
    1. Re:distributed.net by Gregg+M · · Score: 1

      You are definitely right. Cracking rc5 isn't really useful any more, since the point has already been made.

      The point has been made? Who acknowledged this?
      The point hasn't been made yet. But the government is starting to see the light. They are close but we must keep up the pressure!

      This is a pivotal moment in time for RC5 cracking! Sign up Now!

      --
      Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
  132. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by cdlu · · Score: 1

    don't worry, up North we only waste solar energy which would otherwise go to heat by using hydro power.:) No lost fossil fuels...

  133. hmmm.. by drwiii · · Score: 2

    That hack looks an awful lot like Microsoft's new homepage..

  134. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Chocboy · · Score: 1

    yea, either they are as brainless as a rock (why arn't they ever portrayed as dumb in movies) or are super brainy and decide to kill us.. or.. in the middle where they are friendly and will come down anyway

    ...does bill gates birthday co-inciede with roswell does it?


  135. Funny by Nelson · · Score: 1
    Is it just me or are some of the cracks really funny. I check the lists on rootshell and hackernews pretty regularly and from time to time there is some really funny work.


    Yeah I know it's wrong and bad and all that but some of them are really clever.

  136. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Mentat21 · · Score: 1

    Actually they should probably move on to something that is "actually" useful such as searching for Mersenne (sp?) primes or Goloumb rulers. Both of which have practical importance to the world. (Including ironically making it possible to create stronger encryption and position telescopes to receive signals from space more efficiently)

  137. Kewl...Everone loves a good hack! by KingBob · · Score: 1

    Especially if it's a fairly harmless one. I like the SETI project and am using the client software, and definitely would not like to see it fail. That said, at least these guys had the decency to back up the page and not screw the site up too badly, and who knows, they may have done SETI a favour and illustrated the security breach before someone less benign got to it!

    Thanks to the folks who posted mirrors for those of us who could not get there fast enough to see it.

  138. come on by cale · · Score: 2

    For all those taking this too seriously I have one thing to say (well maybe two) lighten up. I don't see it anywhere even close to destructive. Hell, they backed up the old index.html file, what more do you want from them? I found it funnny, its not like it will take them hours and hours of effort to restore. I just hope the people who did it tell the seti people how they did it so the security hole can be fixed. Other than that I think most people just need to lighten up. Though I am glad to see that a good number of the geeks out there do have a sense of humor about things like this that were just ment to be funny.

  139. Lighten up, ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm disappointed that you could actually compare this to terrorist acts that kill people. There was no damage done here. Seti's been made aware of a security issue. They'll make up for their downtime in the number of hits they'll get when they reopen the site. And we've all gotten a good chortle out of it. Obviously you didn't.

    If you want to discuss motive, you need to learn that there's a BIG difference between mischief and malice.

    Lighten up.

    1. Re:Lighten up, ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No...it was backed up, remember? As index.html.old

      It doesn't matter. The machine was compromised, the system must be installed. Otherwise the webmaster/sysadmin should be fired. Besides, now the site _will_ be stronger because they'll patch their security holes.

      How many millions of times must this be repeated ? If you find a security hole you send a mail to the webmaster and/or to security organisation (CERT, ...). If you find a house left open by your neighbour you don't enter and paint the wall or move all the furniture. No you just call him at work. Any other behavior is just plain unacceptable.

      I'm very tired of cretinous defacers, and crackers. This was fun the first time in the history of mankind, and maybe to 2 or 3 next times, but now enough is enough. They make me vomit.

    2. Re:Lighten up, ok? by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Given that they backed up the index.html file, this is more like the digital equivalent of leaving a note on your neighbor's credenza than painting a wall.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    3. Re:Lighten up, ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      'm disappointed that you could actually compare this to terrorist acts that kill people. There was no damage done here. Seti's been made aware of a security issue. They'll make up for their downtime in the number of hits they'll get when they reopen the site. And we've all gotten a good chortle out of it. Obviously you didn't.

      They are not terrorists, but what they did was absolutly, totally and definitly illegal. If you want to warn about security it is much much more effective to send a mail. Now the Seti webmaster will have to reinstall the whole system.

      If you want to discuss motive, you need to learn that there's a BIG difference between mischief and malice.

      I don't care. Illegal things are illegal. I'm growing increasignly tired of idiots, morons, assholes, that have nothing more productive to do with their life than defacing site belonging to others, and find it fun. And I'm not the only one.

    4. Re:Lighten up, ok? by Peale · · Score: 1

      Now the Seti webmaster will have to reinstall the whole system.

      No...it was backed up, remember? As index.html.old

      Besides, now the site _will_ be stronger because they'll patch their security holes.

      Northeast USA Computer Show Schedule
      http://www.vermontel.com/~vengnce/shows

    5. Re:Lighten up, ok? by PotPieMan · · Score: 2

      You guys are missing the point. Now, this has been said before, but I'll say it again. As a sys admin, you have to worry that since the machine was cracked, there are other security holes (read: trojans). Just because the crackers put a nice little comment in the index.html saying the old file was copied to index.html.old doesn't mean that something more malicious wasn't done. Who knows. But there are other ways of notifying the admin other than leaving your mark in such a manner as this.

    6. Re:Lighten up, ok? by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by 2B||!2B:

      I suppose if someone stole your car and dumped it in the next state (that's just mischief, not malice, right?), thereby proving the locks on it aren't reliable, the rest of us would be justified in laughing our asses off at you for having insufficient security.

  140. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Chocboy · · Score: 1

    if i am not mistaken, the basic idea of the prime hunting was for fun. as the numbers that were found we verified on a supercomputer? (well at least something that could veryfy it within like a day or something?

    i agree with ya point about rc5, but its still something do to which will eventually be cracked.
    and its cool, being competitive against ya friend or something

  141. Worrying by Erik+Corry · · Score: 2

    If you downloaded code from SETI@Home and ran it without reading the source and compiling it yourself, then you should be worried that their security is so lax. Perhaps you really installed a trojan that is even now uploading your /etc/passwd file to a cracked ftp server somewhere. If you installed it behind a company firewall, you should be even more worried.

    1. Re:Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No worries... because there isn't any source code. Even without source it is still can be secure. Simply create a 'seti' user and run the program under that id.

  142. Alf is Jar Jar's grandfather by mister_jpeg · · Score: 2

    .....and he must die!

    --
    -jpeg
  143. ALF was an excellent comedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you love those one liners alf always gave to willy tanner?

  144. Re:Hack KKK (Don't) by eshefer · · Score: 0

    agreed.

    --------------------------------
    ( my music)

  145. So? by crayz · · Score: 1

    It's just a text file w/ the html in it. They can just copy it and put it back as html. No problem.

    1. Re:So? by weaselp · · Score: 1

      Yes but if you're interested in the original site you cannot just point your browser to index.html.old.

      Not a real problem though.
      --

      --
      Weasel
  146. Juvenile: yes. Destructive: no. by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    Unlike physical graffiti, this can be cleared up quickly at no cost.

    Besides, the important thing is the work, not the site, and as I just watched my latest block upload, the work appears to be going on unabated.

    Now let's hope someone at Seti notices and tightens up their security.

    (Oh yeah, pun intended.)

    --
    The cake is a pie
  147. Bad Karma, man by The_Jazzman · · Score: 1

    Hey all,

    This is really *really* bad... I mean, what's to stop the hackers doing stuff to log your ip number, ftp into your machine, find security faults and then screw your machine ???

    Even worse, what's going to happen if these hackers happen to find the piece of data that proves that UFOs are out there ??? They could trash it and we would never know !!!

    Even worse, the hackers could get a ton of £££ somehow and when the alien data came through, launch a rocket and cause the first war of the worlds !

    I'm not sure about you, but this scares me...

    Satire - A design for life

    1. Re:Bad Karma, man by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      This is really *really* bad... I mean, what's to stop the hackers doing stuff to log your ip number, ftp into your machine, find security faults and then screw your machine ???
      hmmm, well, seeing as your ip flies around the net with everything you do anyway so whats the big worry, whoa i better not have an ftpserver with full access to my harddrive then.you're on the net,->you're vonerable

      Even worse, what's going to happen if these hackers happen to find the piece of data that proves that UFOs are out there ??? They could trash it and we would never know !!!

      well, good luck on finding something that isn't there... but if they found something(hyperthetically),if it was gonna make a difference, seti's information would not be relevant..

      Even worse, the hackers could get a ton of £££ somehow and when the alien data came through, launch a rocket and cause the first war of the worlds !

      nah,the first war of the worlds is decades old ( :P) it would be the second..

      I'm not sure about you, but this scares me...

      well it humours me, and even more with the fact someone is scared with a change of a filename on a very open server
      ... i certainly hope the boogieman doesn't get me...
      ...

      ok, i confess i am a long nosed brown alien, from the planet Melmac. i did this because you found me out and i want privacy :P





    2. Re:Bad Karma, man by The_Jazzman · · Score: 1

      ok, i confess i am a long nosed brown alien, from the planet Melmac. i did this because you found me out and i want privacy :P

      OHmyGOD !!! You are !!! I'm so sorry for posting that comment... please spare me my life ? Oh GOD, I'M INNOCENT !!!

  148. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You make the unfounded assumption that there is no chance in ever finding anything.

    Even if they don't find life, sooner or later they'll find something interesting, I'm sure.

    Most of the great discoveries in our history has been made while looking for something else.

  149. The evening news... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    At the moment, virtually everyone ignores the KKK website. Hacking the KKK website virtually guarantees that the KKK website will be seen by millions of people on the evening news.

    That is not a good thing.

    One could even claim that this little security breach is a good thing as if we're lucky, it may generate publicity for Seti.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:The evening news... by Gregg+M · · Score: 1

      Hacking the KKK website virtually guarantees that the KKK website will be seen by millions of people on the evening news.

      That is not a good thing.


      Hate grows in the dark! Letting people see what vermin these people are will shine a light on them. That is why we let them march on the streets. We can bring out children and show them what animals they are!

      --
      Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
    2. Re:The evening news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comment next to this one is true. Just like the Communists in Pre-Communist Russia, the extremists are using the secrecy of the internet to spread their destructive beliefs and you know how tempting it is for some to join secret organizations. They are also trying to acquire important positions in gov't, military, etc. so that they can influence the nation as a whole. What would be most constructive is to support groups like the Anti-Defamation League and the ACLU so they can keep track of the activities of these hate groups.

  150. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of talking about things you know nothing of...

    Why don't you stop calling that kettle black?

    ET's are already here... they've been observing us for years.. and
    they've been communicating with the world leaders (who have been deny
    it.) Ever wonder why the gov't pulled the plug on SETI funding? It's
    because they know it's pointless (we're already talking to them.)

    It's nothing but sheer arrogance that leads the SETI people to believe
    that they're going to find something...

    The fact is that they're not, because there is nothing to find.

  151. That would have been true either way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how does finding out about the leak with or without explicitly knowing if you have been Hacked make any difference?
    If your that security conscious you have to assume you have already been Hacked either way.

  152. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Wah · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, that's right. The purpose of life is to constantly press forward until we win. "99% of human action is equaly useless"? Please go kill yourself before you infect the others. I for one will be enjoying all thost "wasted" moments.

    --
    +&x
  153. umm... by crayz · · Score: 1
    Please don't say things when you have no idea what you're talking about. First off, we're obviously not going to find any ET life that doesn't isn't sending out radio waves for us to detect, so they're not going to be brainless as a rock. Secondly, if we pick up their radio waves, we are pickiing up signals that were sent out many years ago. So maybe those radio waves were made 100 or 1000 or more years ago(depending on how far away they are). Therefore: any ET life we detect will almost definitely be far more advanced than us(there are other factors that lead to this belied that I will not bother going into). Npw, about whether they will destroy us. I doubt it. The first thing to remember is that they are many years away even traveling at the speed of light(it's doubtful that they could travel faster). But even if they somehow could travel faster than the speed of light, what reason would they have for spending all that effort just to destroy us. As Ellie says in the movie Contact(the book is way better though): "It would be like going out of their way to destroy some microbes on an anthill in Africa".

    ...does bill gates birthday co-inciede with roswell does it?

    What the hell are you talking about?

    1. Re:umm... by Chocboy · · Score: 1

      well, good luck, i'll just go look for the cat we don't have


      >...does bill gates birthday co-inciede with roswell does it?
      >What the hell are you talking about?
      it was a joke.. (well some sort of attempt)

    2. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because "intelligent" life on this planet could be seen as either a) a possible pest, b) or a possible threat. Either because we've proven ourselves capable of limited, slow space travel, or because we may have interesting resources that the others want to acquire. Suppose another civillization wants something that's common here but rare there -- and doesn't view us as significant enough to preserve?

      It might be possible to "travel" FTL if one can warp space-time.

      After all, we *do* demolish anthills and everything else if they're in the way, eh?

  154. still not fixed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UMM ITS 3:00 pm EST and its still not fixed!!! What're these lazy SETI people doing!

  155. Roblimo has to go.. by R-2-RO · · Score: 1

    Roblimo must go!
    It starts with a little comment (in parenthesis) next thing you know he's posting ignorant views on American government and disabling comments ala Sengan. ( Sengan Must Go Too!)

    Yes. I loved alf. ;)

    --
    Thank you. Drive through. (:wq)
    1. Re:Roblimo has to go.. by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      ...to the store. My wife says so. But I won't disable comments while I'm gone -- or ever. I've been a Slashdot moderator as long as anyone, and I have never downgraded a post. (I've upgraded a few though.) (And made more than my share of parenthetical statements.)

  156. okay... by dangermouse · · Score: 1



    Sorry, but that was damned funny.

    Oh, and I suggest that perhaps the website development and their software development are not really all that intimately tied. (This is not to say that their clients are secure...I don't know. I'm just saying take a logic class.)

  157. those germans.... by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    AFAIK Alf's lat name is spelled "Shumway". That spelling error might uncover the cracker as a German....
    insightful thought... it could possibly be that. Or, the author of the page featuring Alf could be playing on the English pronunciation of the word "school" (note the "sch" at the beginning of the word) which would be "sk-oool"... which would then render the word "Schumway" to be pronounced "Skum-way".. of course, I could be ranting on a wild tangent here....

    --

    Insert mind here.
  158. They made it easy on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better to know that its been compromised and have them really make the system secure than them just being lazy and only fixing the hole. Leaving the possibility that somoene already hacked the system before without making it obvious.

  159. 3:50 EST and it's still up by rueba · · Score: 1

    Maybe all the SETI guys are at the beach. (California + Independece Day)

    Or maybe the Melmacs want to make sure we find and return Alf.....

    --
    The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  160. It doesn't matter if they're out there. by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    Exactly. It is like Columbus. He didn't find what he is looking for, but obviously that didn't mean much in the long run. Hell, what he found was more interesting than what he was looking for!

    Science is filled with people who found something while looking for something else.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  161. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "99% of human action is equaly useless"? Please go kill yourself before you infect the others. I for one will be enjoying all thost "wasted" moments.

    Huh? I didn't understand anything it seems. Go and re-read the phrase:

    • "I am all for the progress of humankind but is this really doing anything more than wasteing fossil feuls. "
    • and the answer "99 % of the human action is equaly useless."
    Did you notice the use of the word equally ?

    I for one will be enjoying all thost "wasted" moments.

    I do to, but I find life better when people are using their brain, and logical abilities when they argue.

  162. Hack me, I'm anti religion. by Michel · · Score: 1
    Who the hell are you to decide who should be hacked?

    You say anti religion sites should be hacked. Why? Think for a bit, it's religion that brought us those KKK idiots in the first place.

    Religion promotes ignorance and closed mindedness. Be religious! Join us! Follow the herd, be a good little sheep now, will you? Baaaaa!

    I'm anti-religious. Hack me. I think for myself instead of blindly following some religion. Is that so bad that I should be hacked?

    Hmm, sorry about the rant, but ignorant assholes like that piss me off.

    And why is this guy moderated up anyway?

  163. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I beleive that the cracker wants to show that SETI@home is silly, just like ALF.

    So he should voice his opinions, with his arguments. Not impose his view. What he did was similar to barge in in a Church during mass, throw the priest on the floor, and shout "God does not exists!" to the peopl there.

    I am all for the progress of humankind but is this really doing anything more than wasteing fossil feuls.

    99 % of the human action is equaly useless. What's the point of the football ? What have you done for the progress of humankind today ? I'm talking about progress, not subsitance. Most of the people just assure their own subsistance, and whether they exist or not would do no difference.

  164. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 1

    ...does bill gates birthday co-inciede with roswell does it?

    Bill Gates was born on October 28, 1955.

    The Roswell crash occured in early July, 1947. (The actual crash was reported in a newspaper on July 8 but a rancher claimed finding debris on July 4.) So let's see who was born around that time period:

    July 3, 1947 Dave Berry
    July 9, 1947 O J Simpson
    July 18, 1947 Steve Forbes
    July 24, 1947 Robert Hayes
    (Ok, the last one is a bit late, but hey, he played an alien in the TV Series Starman)

    Marv


    --
    I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
  165. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Roswell crash occured in early July, 1947. (The actual crash was reported in a newspaper on July 8 but a rancher claimed finding debris on July 4.) So let's see who was born around that time period:

    Nah... What you really want to look at is who was born nine months later.

    ;)

    -D
    dcross@cryogen.com

  166. Oh for chrissakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lighten the fuck up. I'm sure jokes about famous
    people are also "not funny because it's making
    fun of real people with feelings". Please. The
    only people who think like you are fuckin lawyers
    out to make a buck.

  167. Hey fucker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it made a lot of us laugh. Mission accomplished.

  168. Not all religions are intolerent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, most religions you never hear much about in the media actually respect other religions as equals to an extent. Only the extremist religions promote intolerence.

    As some may have pointed out (though w/ some flawed logic), various religious groups use hatred as a tool to secure power over it's subjects and denounce others as lies of some manner. However, many of their claims are actually based on groundless proof, irrationality, or just plain stupidity.

    It's really sad that you'd preach intolerence towards the intolerent (though I can understand the "eye for and eye" bit).

  169. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myself, I don't feel the need to have support
    from a religion. But I'm not going to abuse
    someone for having a faith of some kind. I
    didn't need a God to teach me to be tollerant
    and a nice guy.

    It was good parenting. Unforunately, no one ever
    thinks about that.

    1. Re:Agreed by Michel · · Score: 1
      I'm not going to abuse someone for having a faith of some kind.

      Hey, ofcourse not. If it works for them, and they keep it to themselves, that's fine. Just don't keep bothering me with it. It's when they keep pestering me with their religious beliefs and FUD that I'll gladly return the call... ;-)

  170. Re:Who should be fired?!? by Acheron · · Score: 1

    Lets see...

    1. Someone's been in your machine. They may have replaced only that index.html file, in which case, you're going to rebuild the machine for nothing. On the other hand... you don't know what they did. They might have replaced cron with a toaster-control server app. They might have replaced su with a little script that posts whatever you type after Password: on Slashdot, along with your ip and boss' home phone number. They might just have patched things up so that all credit card numbers coming into your ecommerce form are automatically mailed to 3l33th4xors@yahoo.com and carbon copied to your client with a big ascii-art image that says FSCK U. Or perhaps they simply reconfigured sendmail so that whenever the mail queue runs, it bundles up all the mailbox files on the server and forwards them as PGP encoded attachments to the FBI.

    It's not the security hole that you are worried about after its been exploited. You could fix the security hole. But you'll never know what they did AFTER they exploited it, and that's the big concern...

    2. If your 100k hit/day webserver is so important, you'll have a clone to dump in its spot during the rebuild, right?

    You don't know what they did. You MUST rebuild it.

    ~Acheron

  171. Re:Arrg... perhaps Gordon Schumway knows... by Leebert · · Score: 1
    cos it could be past 255 (like in the movie 'the net').

    As much as I hated "The Net", I just looked over that one as the 555-1212 of the computer world.

  172. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by SpaceCadet · · Score: 1
    I haven't heard you use logic yet. Neither did the originator of the thread. Logic, you see, is on the side of the Seti team, not yours. Your logic is the logic of the old school, the logic of those who told the Wright brothers they couldn't fly, and the logic that told Columbus he'd never succeed.

    Your logic is based on the idea that "It's never happened before, so it will never happen." Which is, quite simply, wrong.

    Go read Drake's equation. Plug any numbers you like into it, remembering that your numbers must be reasonable and must accept as your starting hypothesis that the lowest possible answer is 1 - Earth. Solve for 1 and see the numbers that are required, just to prove the point. They're preposterous - way, way too small. Any reasonable number provides for millions of planets with life. Intelligent life? Well, that's another question, but it's at least worth taking a look.

    --
    -- The meek shall inherit the Earth. In very small plots, about 6 feet by 3.
  173. Re:Did you miss the crack on the Seti@home web pag by zztzed · · Score: 1

    No one's website is `worth' being hacked, least of all a hate group's or anti-religion organization's. Most of these websites recieve little to no attention from the general public. If someone were to hack them, it would quite likely make it on every major network's evening news program, and then they'd be getting a whole lot of undeserved attention. I also disagree with your statement that anti-religion organizations' websites should be hacked on the basis that I'm an agnostic and could be considered to be anti-religion, or at least lacking in the religion department. In any case, s long as they're not harassing you, don't harass them.

  174. speed of light... by Malto · · Score: 1

    A while back I heard that the speed of light does not necessarily have to be constant. I havent run across any thing other than that though. I also heard that instead of the speed of light being 186,000 miles per second it has slowed to below 160,000 miles per second. Does this mean that light COULD move faster somewhere out in space than it has ever been observed here on earth?

  175. SETI@Home not undeserving of a mild crack by jonabbey · · Score: 1

    As much as I support SETI@Home, I have to say that their web site has not been the most forthcoming or interactive. Things like distributed.net go all out to keep everyone informed of what's going on, whereas the folks at SETI@Home would go weeks or months with no status updates or anything. How many times were those 115 initial work units processed by the 500,000 people who signed up and had their CPU's devoting time and heat to uselessly redundant processing?

    I understand the difference in complexity between the rc5 stuff and what SETI@Home is doing, and the limited resources available to people working on a grant, but I think the folks there need to understand that you do something of this size on the net, you have to expect a rich interaction with the community, one way or the other. I view ALF as the community sort of reaching out and saying 'hi' to folks that haven't been as communicative as we're used to with other net projects.

    And it was funny. I had completely forgotten that ALF ever existed. Too bad they didn't include a .wav of ALF ranting about something to be 'the message'.

  176. proof by analogy by Edward+Carter · · Score: 1

    Analogies are only useful to clarify arguments, not support them. Come back when all it takes is a "mv" command to clean graffiti paint off of your house.

    1. Re:proof by analogy by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Oh, so it's a matter of degree? How many 'mv' commands would it take in your opinion before it's not okay? A small version of a crime is still a crime. Or do actually condone strangers messing around on your computer as long as the number of commands to fix the problem is held to, say, less than 5?

      chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  177. Re:Arrg . . . silliness by SpaceCadet · · Score: 1
    I would have more respect for your argument if you showed any signs of intelligence or logical thought.

    A) Logically, life must be possible in the Universe. Else you would not be here. Assuming you are.

    B) If life is possible here, then it is possible where ever the conditions are like the conditions here.

    C) The Sun is a normal, slightly variable G0 star in the main sequence. Slightly heavier than the average in heavy metals and Rare Earth metals, but that's not all that rare. Millions of stars just like it are scattered through the galaxy.

    D) Every day, we find more planets around stars we never thought could possibly have them, indicating that planets are very common in the Universe.

    E) Given all these things, we are extremely likely to find life someday. Through SETI? Who knows? Let's find out.

    F) If the Earth First! and Greenpeace and other tree-hugging wackos would quit getting in the way of nuclear plants and solar power stations, we would not be using any fossil fuels. All the neo-luddites can go live in caves in the dark if they wish. I prefer the taste of well-cooked steak and nice, bright electric lamps and convenient hot water. But if you disagree, that's your right. Go ahead. Quit using your computer - you don't want to waste more fuel, do you?

    Finally, the art of language is one of the greatest achievements of humanity. Quit mangling it.

    --
    -- The meek shall inherit the Earth. In very small plots, about 6 feet by 3.
  178. Tunneling, misuse of computing power, etc. etc. by Erik+Corry · · Score: 1

    Simply create a 'seti' user and run the program under that id.

    Even as a 'seti' user they can:

    • Set up a tunnel through your firewall (eg with your http proxy).
    • Get hold of your /etc/passwd file (unless you are using shadow passwords)
    • Use all that wonderful SETI@Home computing power to crack the passwd files of your machine or others'.
    • Launch attacks on third parties through your site
    • Set up a Warez server on your machine
    • Crack other machines (non-Linux) on your firewall-protected LAN

    I can't imagine why you find the lack of source code reassuring.

  179. I liked ALF too! by TheWall · · Score: 1

    Now I am only 18 so I was pretty young when I saw ALF but still, I liked it too.