Slashdot Mirror


Extraterrestrial Real Estate for Sale

Tom Mulcahy pointed us over to The Lunar Embassy. Yes, that's right. You can purchase real estate on the Moon, Io, Venus, Mars, and, apparently the Universe. Ah, the beauty of capitalism.

230 comments

  1. LINUX by BWS · · Score: 1

    what if we bought a big space on the moon (the side that always faced Earth) and put the word L-I-N-U-X in REALLY REALLY BIG letter?

    --
    -- Note: These Comments are Generated by ME! Not You! ME!
    1. Re:LINUX by greenfly · · Score: 1

      That's like that Tick episode where Chairface Chippendale starts to write on the moon and only half succeeds, what was cool was that in each following show, whenever the moon was in the shot, that writing was still there.


      Spoooooooooon!

    2. Re:LINUX by Bastian · · Score: 2

      or better yet, "f0bic, your seksi voice helped me through the night"

    3. Re:LINUX by CaptSarcastic · · Score: 1

      Heh, yea, good episode (good series)

      On a more realistic note, what if Pepsi bought all the rights and used it as a giant billboard? sales would certainly go up once a month...

      Hang on to those titles, they could be worth something... =P

      --
      `nuff sed.
    4. Re:LINUX by embobo · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, that reminds me of my college days at Lawrence University. I was forced to live in the awful Plantz Hall jock dorm. My room overlooked the Ave and Main Hall so I cutout these huge letters and put "F-R-O-N-T-2-4-2" in my window for all to marvel at.

  2. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by bi0s · · Score: 1

    No, It does not. It can't, & neither can any other nation. A few decades ago, the U.N. (the body that does nothing) ratified, & I believe all countries signed a law saying that no nation can own a part of the solar system. Or something like that ;)

    Tom

    --
    We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately. -- Ben Franklin, July 4th, 1776
  3. Must Look Different Up Close by Bob(TM) · · Score: 1

    Humm - funny, the moon doesn't look like a bridge from here ...

    --

    The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  4. Re:Porn! by radja · · Score: 1

    porn at 0G? bad idea.. icky blobs of semen floating around the room.

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  5. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Pentagram · · Score: 1

    You can't see the landing site. Well you can (ie the general area of the moon) but you can't see eg the US flag or footprints.

  6. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Pentagram · · Score: 1

    1) They could have just orbited the Earth a few times before splashing down.

    2) With a large enough telescope, maybe. BUT NO SUCH TELESCOPE EXISTS!!!!!

    3) there != their

    4) Conceded

  7. Humans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We always want to think we own everything. But when first getting materialistic, we ain't worth no more, nor less, than the molecules we're all made up from. I think we should calm down a little.

  8. Re:ebay by Pentagram · · Score: 1

    Because it doesn't mean you own it. Tell you what, send ME $20, and I'll tell you that you own a bit of the moon.

  9. A Certain Red-faced Gentleman (or mushroom) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The fourth planet belonged to a businessman. This man was so much occupied that he did not even raise his head at the little prince's arrival.

    "Good morning," the little prince said to him. "Your cigarette has gone out."

    "Three and two make five. Five and seven make twelve. Twelve and three make fifteen. Good morning. Fifteen and seven make twenty-two. Twenty-two and six make twenty-eight. I haven't time to light it again. Twenty-six and five make thirty-one. Phew! Then that makes five-hundred-and-one million, six-hundred-twenty-two thousand, seven-hundred-thirty-one."

    "Five hundred million what?" asked the little prince.

    "Eh? Are you still there? Five-hundred-and-one million---I can't stop . . . I have so much to do! I am concerned with matters of consequence. I don't amuse myself with balderdash. Two and five make seven . . ."

    "Five-hundred-and-one million what?" repeated the little prince, who never in his life had let go of a question once he had asked it.

    The businessman raised his head.

    "During the fifty-four years that I have inhabited this planet, I have been disturbed only three times. The first time was twenty-two years ago, when some giddy goose fell from goodness knows where. He made the most frightful noise that resounded all over the place, and I made four mistakes in my addition. The second time, eleven years ago, I was disturbed by an attack of rheumatism. I don't get enough exercise. I have no time for loafing. The third time---well, this is it! I was saying, then, five-hundred-and-one millions---"

    "Millions of what?"

    The businessman suddenly realized that there was no hope of being left peace until he answered this question.

    "Millions of those little objects," he said, "which one sometimes sees in the sky."

    "Flies?"

    "Oh, no. Little glittering objects."

    "Bees?"

    "Oh, no. Little golden objects that set lazy men to idle dreaming. As for I am concerned with matters of consequence. There is no time for idle dreaming in my life."

    "Ah! You mean the stars?"

    "Yes, that's it. The stars."

    "And what do you do with five-hundred millions of stars?"

    "Five-hundred-and-one million, six-hundred-twenty-two thousand, seven-hundred-thirty-one. I am concerned with matters of consequence: I am accurate."

    "And what do you do with these stars?"

    "What do I do with them?"

    "Yes."

    "Nothing. I own them."

    "You own the stars?"

    "Yes."

    "But I have already seen a king who---"

    "Kings do not own, they reign over. It is a very different matter."

    "And what good does it do you to own the stars?"

    "It does me the good of making me rich."

    "And what good does it do you to be rich?"

    "It makes it possible for me to buy more stars, if any are discovered."

    "This man," the little prince said to himself, "reasons a little like my poor tippler."

    Nevertheless, he still had some more questions.

    "How is it possible for one to own the stars?"

    "To whom do they belong?" the businessman retorted, peevishly.

    "I don't know. To nobody."

    "Then they belong to me, because I was the first person to think of it."

    "Is that all that is necessary?"

    "Certainly. When you find a diamond that belongs to nobody, it is yours. When you discover an island that belongs to nobody, it is yours. When you get an idea before anyone else, you take out a patent on it: it is yours. So with me: I own the stars, bccause nobody else before me ever thought of owning them."

    "Yes, that is true," said the little prince. "And what do you do with them?"

    "I administer them," replied the businessman. "I count them and recount them. It is difficult. But I am a man who is naturally interested in matters of consequence.

    The little prince was still not satisfied.

    "If I owned a silk scarf," he said, "I could put it around my neck and take it away with me. If I owned a flower, I could pluck that flower and take it away with me. But you cannot pluck the stars from heaven."

    "No. But I can put them in the bank."

    "Whatever does that mean?"

    "That means that I write the number of my stars on a little paper. And then I put this paper in a drawer and lock it with a key."

    "And that is all?"

    "That is enough," said the businessman.

    "It is entertaining," thought the little prince. "It is rather poetic. But it is no great consequence."

    On matters of consequence, the little prince had ideas which were very different from those of the grown-ups.

    "I myself own a flower," he continued his conversation with the busine man, "which I water every day. I own three volcanoes, which I clean out eve week (for I also clean out the one that is extinct; one never knows). It is some use to my volcanoes, and it is of some use to my flower, that I own the But you are of no use to the stars . . ."

    The businessman opened his mouth, but he found nothing to say in answer. And the little prince went away.

    "The grown-ups are certainly altogether extraordinary," he said simply, talking to himself as he continued on his journey.

  10. Hmmm... by Mr_Plow · · Score: 1

    Touché
    ------------------------------------------ ----------------

  11. Re:Antartica? by natek · · Score: 1
    I believe America's current policy is that is has claimed no land, reserves the right to do so, and does not recognize any other countries' claims there.

    I also believe there are environmental treaties restricting how Antartica can be exploited, not sure right off the top of my head.

    Right now there are a bunch of bases there, basically just research, and a handful of permanent ones, from a few countries. I'm not aware of any actual territorial claims.

  12. The Lunar Embassy by OctaneZ · · Score: 1

    Holy /. effect batman.

  13. Maybe we should wait a little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm puzzled. Man doesn't know a thing about the moon but he already makes bucks selling parts of it to brain damaged consumers. Never thought human stupidity could go this far. And when all those cute little "settlers" finally go there, may the old, powerful, and pissed up alien race which inhabits the moon flow out from the craters and get rid of them. Please ;)

  14. Re:What time zone? by Ektanoor · · Score: 1

    Time zones will be mainly local with a translation
    system to Earth times. It is not correct to say that UTC is used in space applications. UTC is mainly used in observations from Earth. However it is not the main standard for times in space probe
    communications. There, it is mostly used sideral time and more complex stuff. One of them is to use the planet's "proper" timings.
    Presently I only know about one planet carrying a complete timing up to a calendar system: Mars. Due to several constraints people at JPL created and used the Darien calendar. It looks much like Earth's but with clear differences. For example the day, "sol" is a bit longer than Earth's. As far as I know the first use of the Darien calendar was on Viking missions. After that and until Pathfinder's arrival it was nearly forgotten.

  15. Re:I own a piece of the Moon by AndyL · · Score: 1

    Well, my extraterestrial geography isn't as great as it might be. But I'm pretty sure that 29 and a quarter squares to the south-east of the extreme northwest corner of the Martian chart is still part of Mars.

    Also, It doesn't seem to mention how much land you've got. Seems a deed would need this information.

  16. ... only in the U.S.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lemme get this straight - he registered his claim in the U.S. Now, the laws of the U.S. apply only in the U.S., which surely means that his "right" to sell lunar property only applies in the U.S.

    Before his "ownership" of the moon, registered in the U.S., could be recognised internationally, surely the U.S. herself would have to claim the moon, which she is forbidden from doing so by the Outer Space Treaty.

    Which means that if the U.S. ever did claim the moon, this guy would automatically get it!

  17. Re:outer space treaty by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    The flag is up there at six manned sights, but unlike Cortez and his contempoaries, Armstrong and the other lunar mission commanders made NO clain to lunar territory. As I remember the plaque reads "We Come In Peace For All Mankind" and it's signed by President Nixon among others.

    "Space Command" it maybe, but it's all about watching "them" here on Earth.

  18. Re: Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Ivootje · · Score: 1

    Does Spain own the Americas?

    No, and neither does Italy. (Italy, more specific the countryside of Genua, is where Columbus came from).

    And I'm sure the original Indian tribes put some flags somewhere, or the Normans, or...

  19. Re:International Agreement? by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    Let's not get bent out of shape here. The treaty has NEVER been enforced, Since the end of the Cold War, there's nothing TOO enforce, and nothing to enforce it with. Besides it's an American tradition to break treaties when land expansion is concerned, so I wouldn't worry.

    The only thing besides lack of technology holding the corporates from expanding into space is that there isn't any money to be made there... yet. And that's the only reason they'll go, forget the Star Trek crap.

  20. Re:loophole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh, but the Space Treaty also specifies that citizens of a Nation fall under the jurisdiction of the Nation. This Treaty follows a slightly different legal regime than what is legal in the US. No *person* can have greater rights than the Nation they are subject to. This also applies to corporations as they are legally "people" in most conexts.

  21. Re:the flag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, a rocket engine uses a hot gas as propulsion, therefore there was a "wind". Second of all, back to the original discussion, the five other Apollo missions to land on the moon left flags, and they were smart enough to learn from Apollo 11's mistakes and place the flags far enough away from the landing site whereas the ascent stage rocket would not disturb them.

  22. /.'d by LurkingWeasel · · Score: 1

    The site seems to be Slashdoted @2:47 PDT

  23. Re:I'm just waiting... by QuMa · · Score: 1

    Uranus is already taken... Someone made a comment quite early stating that they didn't want any properties on uranis. Tehehe.

  24. I thought I owned the Moon. by Kismet · · Score: 0

    Plus I claim exclusive rights to Rigel, the martian moon Deimos, and any planetary system found in the Greater Magelanic Cloud.

    I demand that all governments remove any of their space junk that they have put on my moon. And destroy any probes that may be travelling in my space. Otherwise, I will have to start charging royalty fees.

    Not to mention that I have a patent on the cloud patterns on Jupiter. It pisses me off to see people publishing pictures of them without me knowing.

  25. Serious advice by marcinka · · Score: 2

    Be careful when you choose a planet to put your money in. Due to limitations of the TCP/IP standard (2 minute timeout) you won't be able to access the 'net from your favorite Mars part.

    It's a good argument to use when negotiating the price :)

    1. Re:Serious advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... sounds like we'll need SERIOUS caching proxies to read /. from other planets...

  26. WAR!!!! by c+era · · Score: 0

    Lets face it, if country X starts selling land on the moon country Y will get upset. Then those countries will fight each other to gain control of the moon. After one country wins the conlinies on the moon will rebel starting another war. In the end the colinies on the moon will win and country X and Y will lose.

    1. Re:WAR!!!! by kimber1162 · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, the owners of moon property are from almost every country in the world and if you check the Lunar Embassy guestbook, you will see that the last thing on their minds is war. Consider this, your neighbor on the moon is not an American, German,or a Russian. Your neighbor is your neighbor. I think this breaks alot of barriers. Give it a chance.

  27. Read the small print by vik · · Score: 5

    Uh, guys, isn't this a novelty item?

    Nobody owns the moon. Ownership is prohibited by a few treaties. Details of the legal aspects of owning the moon can be found off the Artemis Society homepage, specifically in the Frequently Raised Objections section.

    As an aside, TransOrbital Inc. is going to be taking pictures of the moon using a telescope in lunar orbit, so people will be able to have a picture of "their" plot if they choose.

    Vik :v)

    1. Re:Read the small print by AndyL · · Score: 2

      More important then treaties, there's no inforcment. If tomorrow I land on your section of the Moon and begin mining for moon-dust what are you going to do about it.

      There's not a court on Earth that would touch me. Even if they did, what are they going to do? Stop buying my Moon Dust? Ha! Moon dust is a valuable commodity. That's why I'm mining it. Any country that bans the import of Moon Dust is hurting itself more then it's hurting me.

  28. Re:... by Rhombus · · Score: 1

    Prior inhabitants have never been much of an obstacle to 'manifest destiny'. Just ask the Indians.

  29. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2

    After all, if you went there and declared autonomy, who would come stop you?

    Lack of food, fuel, and oxygen.


    Berlin-- http://www.berlin-consortium.org
    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  30. Annoying profiteering by substrate · · Score: 2

    This is a really annoying form of profiteering. It's capitalizing on peoples interest in space and space exploration. There's technically nothing wrong with of course. I find it sad however that no good will come from this for space exploration. People are going to hand over money for a useless certificate.

    I'd much rather see people donate money to the Planetary Society. Sure, you don't get a nifty laser printed certificate you can pretend entitles you to interplanetary real estate but maybe you'll fund some useful research.

  31. loophole by Bastian · · Score: 1

    ahh but that law says no NATION.

    1. Re:loophole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, so now all you have to do is to find a country that is not a signatory to the UN Charter. So great, now the holy see can stake claims to the moon

    2. Re:loophole by mistabobdobalina · · Score: 1

      isnt some crazy millionaire starting a floating country? also, doesnt some liquore company (colt 45? crazy horse?) have its own legal country in the caribbean???

      --
      -- your knees hurt, don't they?
  32. US doesn't own the moon at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S.S.R. was the first to land on the moon, your government just didn't let you know, poor americans. BTW the amstrong landing was a scam, they had shoot it some place in Nevada and Quebec, don't believe everything you see on TV.

    1. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm going to have to kill you after you read this, but what the hell. See the Feds keep track of all telescopes that are powerful enough to see the "landing" site. They then ensure that they are fitted with a special lens that contains a compound that chemically reacts to light reflected from the moon. This reaction causes people to think that the distortion in the lens is actually an image of the landing site.

      So now I'm going to need to know your address so I can mail you the home version of the "I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you" kit.

      -sw

    2. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...they had shoot it some place in Nevada and Quebec, don't believe everything you see on TV.

      No, no, no. They went out to the edge of the earth where the dirt looks like that and shot it. Yer folks did tell you about the earth really being flat and all that didn't they?

    3. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Then why can you see the landing site with a good telescope?

    4. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the reflector they placed on the moon to take distance measurements.

    5. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by superape23 · · Score: 2

      An AC SAID: The U.S.S.R. was the first to land on the moon, your government just didn't let you know, poor americans. BTW the amstrong landing was a scam, they had shoot it some place in Nevada and Quebec, don't believe everything you see on TV.

      this is my favorite ac conspiracy theory.
      Have you seen the moon footage? did they shoot in that new low gravity area of quebec? come on kid. stay anonymous so that nsa doesn't "dissapear" you for letting it out of the bag.

    6. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've heard alot of morons in my life but this guy takes the cake

    7. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by Spamizbad · · Score: 1

      This is sarcasm... I hope. I know i've heard this rumor other places as well. But I chose not to believe it for the following reasons: 1)My grandfather was in the navy, and was on one of the small ships that picked up the vessel at re-entry. 2)The Flag can be seen with a large enough telescope. 3)Russians were the first in space, however, they could not pull off a moon mission because there equipment needed a bit more ajustment. 4)Due to the position russia was in. If a Moon landing was successful, they would have made a BIG deal out of it into order to generate ph34r of their communist power. They didnt keep sputnik under cover.

    8. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by MartyC · · Score: 1

      1) I don't think he means the USSR landed a man. They were the first to land an unmanned probe though when the US could only manage targetted crashes.

      2) The flag _could_ be seen by a large enough telescope, but it would have to be roughly 60 metres across in order to see it as anything other than a dot. The largest telescope in the world is only ten meteres. In addition, so as to avoid atmospheric conditions interfering, you'd have to put it in space. :)

      You'd stand a better chance of seeing the abandoned lower stage of the lunar module, which is probably just about visible using the largest telescopes in the world, providing you use some of the modern high tech compensation techniques to cope with the atmospheric image degradation.

      3) IIRC it wasn't "a bit of adjustment" it was down to the fact that their new bigger rockets kept blowing up and so they lost too much time on the US.

      4) I agree, but see 1.

      --
      -- "Sponges grow in the ocean. I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be if that didn't happen."
    9. Re:US doesn't own the moon at all by AndyL · · Score: 1

      No, but they shot it in the normal section of Quebec.(They didn't know about the low gravity area until years afterward.) The footage we see is played back in slow-motion. That's why they don't let us see into the face-masks. We'd be able to tell the footage had been slowed down.

      If I ever goto Quebec and find that it isn't all grey and full of craters then I'll be real disapointed.

  33. Moon Ownership Law by Head+Louse · · Score: 4
    According to Discover: The 1979 resolution states that the moon and its natural resources are the common heritage of mankind and that the moon shall not be used for military purposes. It also declares that any benefits derived from the exploitation of the moon's natural resources will be shared, "whereby the interests and needs of the developing countries, as well as the efforts of those countries which have contributed either directly or indirectly to the exploration of the moon, shall be given special consideration."
    Only problem with the Moon Treaty is that the United States and the other space-faring civilizations refused to sign it.

    According to the The Artimis Project:
    The Moon is a venue of "lex nullus"; that is, it is identical in legal status to the high seas, meaning that nobody can own it and everybody can go there.

    1. Re:Moon Ownership Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Treaty stated isn't worth the scrap it is printed on. This particular Treaty was not ratified by any spacefaring country.

    2. Re:Moon Ownership Law by DanMcS · · Score: 1

      No matter what the treaties say, if someone discovers some really valuable resource on the moon, like a big ice field, and the technology exists to exploit it, then it will be owned by whoever gets there first with the most marines. That's the same way it happened in the colonization of the Americas, and I see no reason to think the behavior of governments has changed in the past few hundred years.
      Regardless, I think I'll invest in some real estate on the scenic slopes of Olympus Mons, and bequeath it to my great grandchildren. In about 100 years that's going to be prime tourism ground ;)

      --
      Communication is only possible between equals
    3. Re:Moon Ownership Law by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3

      Y'know, it's a lot easier to be noble in the abstract. Sure, let's make these grand, philanthropic treaties that block access to the moon. Nobody's going to be colonizing there in our lifetimes anyway, the congressmen might think, and it makes us look all noble and humanitarian to the constituents back home.

      I have to wonder just how long all these treaties will hold up when travel to and colonization of the moon (or Mars, etc.) becomes non-trivial.

      After all, nuclear test-ban treaties are broken all the time...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:Moon Ownership Law by Head+Louse · · Score: 1

      Yeah and just like a lot of those test ban treaties the big boys (ie. US and other spacefaring countries) refused to sign the moon treaty.

  34. Re:international agreement -- I hope so! by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    Yep, I'm looking forward to the day like in the Heinlein novel, The Man Who Sold the Moon, Pepsi spends a ton of money for the right to spread lots of dark dust to put it's logo on the face of the Moon.

    Heck, NJ's Governer Christine Whitman has already started her pioneering steps. Come watch some sports at the Continental Airlines Arena, catch your band at the PNC Bank Arts Center. I'm waiting anxiously to see who buys the right to rename the Great Falls next.

  35. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    All the flag discussion is moot. As been said before, The Apollo flags weren't planted as flags of colonisation. (No claims to territory were made at the time of the landings). They were more in the spirit of the flags that climbers put on top of Mt. Everest.

    Considering the times, (still relatively deep in the Cold War), the only real effect would have been to fuel Communist claims of capitalist expansionism.)

    Whoever does actually get their first with a full-blown commerical industrial colony will mostly likely be the first to scrap said treaty, followed by whoever makes it next. As far as I know, the Russians didn't even bother to claim the ice caves they discovered at the lunar pole. Right now making legal decisions on this makes about as much sense as the U.S. positions on cryptography.

  36. Re:Hunka hunka burnin Sun. by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    And the light WILL be on for you. :)

  37. You cant have stars named after you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a con. Plain an simple. You name will never appear in a real celestial catalogue. Unless you happen to have a name like Apha Gamma 7 or something stupid. Some people sometimes get asteroids etc named after them, but they dont need to pay. They are usually well respected astronomers or sci fi writers etc etc. Brad Brad

  38. Re:Novelty value only by Neuroprophet · · Score: 1

    I don't see anything on the website stating that this is a novelty only. Everything I read says that they have a legal right to sell moon property because the owner of the company filed a declaration of ownership of the moon with the US gov. in 1980.

    Now, if it says for novelty only on the deed when you get it, couldn't you sue for false advertising ? The web site insists over and over again that it isn't a joke and it's legal.

    If it does say that this is a novelty only on the website, I missed it and I would greatly appreciate you letting me know where on the site it says this.

  39. It's projected with lasers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's projected with lasers.

  40. Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Gothland · · Score: 1

    I mean, by really old common-law type standards, first person to put a flag on the territory gets it, yes?

    --

    1. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hand someone cash for land on the moon or IO or titan....etc, then you are an idiot. This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.

    2. Re: Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
      Actually, that is not known. Columbus origin is unknown. It is only known that the earliest records of his father is from that region, but those records are from after Columbus was born.

      Some theories speculate that he was from Norway.

      It goes like this: Columbus never actually used the name Columbus himself. He used "Colon", which means "farmer". Around the same time of the first records of his father, a family from one of the oldest royal families in Norway, "Bonde", emigrated due to a power struggle.

      "Bonde" is Norwegian for farmer. Also, Columbus weaponshield used the same symbols as the Bonde family, and the family had a connection to Italy.

      If that theory holds, the current heirs of the Columbus name can trace their family back to Assyrian royalty somewhere around 1000-500 B.C..

      There is record of the ancestors of the Bonde family as Assyrian royalty that migrated through Europe, at some point serving the Pope, then moving through what is now Germany, as part of the Karolingian dynasty, controlling part of Germany. At some point they emigrated again, and became the foundation of one of the oldest known Scandinavian royal families, with lots of power both in Sweden and Norway.

      At one point they held the Norwegian throne.

      Then, as mentioned before, a part of the family suddenly disappears totally, after a power struggle. And at the same time Christoffer Colon (oddly similar to Kristoffer Bonde - as mentioned, Bonde and Colon has the same meaning), and his father appears in public records in Italy, using the same weapon shield. And Christopher soon develop royal ambitions (claiming the title of "vice king" of any land he discovers). Also, according to several accounts from his lifetime, he had fair or reddish hair, and is very tall.

      It's an intriguing thought :-)

      If it's true, it means that his current heirs can pretty much give up any thought of spending time of genealogy - that family is extremely well documentet.

      (Btw.: All historical detail is a result of my bad memory of a book on the subject... I'm likely to have screwed up details :-)

    3. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, the moon is a neutral zone.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    4. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by tekman · · Score: 1

      This is why the concept of real estate has never been a good one. No one can really own land.

      Land can be occupied. That's what armies are for. They occupy land that their respective countries claim and repel others who claim it.

      Which bring us to the problem of the moon. Does the US own the moon, as has been suggested? My invariable answer must be no. The US neither exploiting its resources (any more than anyone else on the planet, anyway), nor occupying it.

      The question is would the US attempt to defend the moon from invasion from other sovereign powers? For example, if {insert your least favorite country here - if it's the US insert your second choice} started building a colony on the moon, would the US start a war over it?

      Actually, I find it more likely that the US would just send country#2 a bill. Or legislate that no one may build moon colonies. Especially if the name of the moon colony closely resembles the name of a government website. :-)

    5. Re: Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, if you want to go down that route, Spain could just go find some other country to claim.... The Vikings got there a few hundred years earlier :-)

      Actually, Columbus had contacts among Portuguese seamen, and the Portuguese at the time had a colony on Greenland. According to several accounts, it was well known among the sailors in the Portuguese colony, that there were old maps in existence that showed land far to the west of Greenland.

    6. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by mmontour · · Score: 1

      In Heinlein's "The Man Who Sold The Moon", a few different ideas are kicked around - one of them is that the moon "belongs" to those countries over which it orbits (intersected by a line from the moon to the center of the earth). Over the course of a year this would sweep out a band of equatorial countries, but would also touch a bit of the USA (though not the USSR). A good story, and an early reference to the idea of using the moon as an advertising billboard. :-)

      I think (but I'm not certain) this story is contained in this collection (at barnesanddnoble.com).

    7. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by EngrBohn · · Score: 3

      IANAL, and it has been four years since I took a "Space Treaties and Legislation" class...
      Under The Outer Space Treaty (short title), no country can stake claim on an extraterrestial body (including the Moon) -- says nothing about private organizations. The Moon Treaty (short title), which only a handful of countries have signed (none of the major space powers have signed it), is based on The Law of the Sea Convention and is more muddy regarding private ownership rights.
      As to whether the U.S. could currently claim ownership, territorial waters traditionally had been defined by the range of the most advanced artillary of the time (weapons of the last few decades has made this absurd, which is why there is now an arbitrary distance used). Even if the U.S. claimed ownership of the Moon, it is currently in no position to defend that claim.
      Christopher A. Bohn

      --
      cb
      Oooh! What does this button do!?
    8. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by vlax · · Score: 2

      The Outer Space treaty was almost a decade before the Law of the Sea (which the US still hasn't ratified) and was mostly modelled on the terms of the Antarctic treaty, with one exception. The Antarctic treaty does not annul national claims in Antarctica (a number of nations claim parts of it and the claims overlap), it simply postpones their enforcement and resolution indefinitely. The Outer Space treaty very definitely forbids claims to any object in space.

    9. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by RPoet · · Score: 1

      I mean, by really old common-law type standards, first person to put a flag on the territory gets it, yes?

      I suppose so, but as everyone knows, when the eagle took off from the moon, the flag blew down and it's supposedly not stuck to the surface of the moon today.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    10. Re: Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Tava · · Score: 1

      Does Spain own the Americas?
      Who puts the flag is a non issue, noone really cares now because noone could use it even if the owned it, but you can rest assured that when the moon becomes profitable someone will fight over it.
      By the way if I recall correctly the moon and every other celestial body aside earth is considered neutral zone (untill someone colonizes them)

    11. Re:Doesn't the US Own the Moon? by Amphigory · · Score: 3

      I think you've find that, in this case as in many others, possession is nine tenths of the law. After all, if you went there and declared autonomy, who would come stop you?

      --
      -- Slashdot sucks.
  41. Re:when will they learn??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't they read The Moon is a Cruel Mistress?

    Probably not, since the book is titled The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.

  42. Re:who has rights to the moon... Emperor Norton I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Everybody understands Mickey Mouse.
    Few understand Hermann Hesse.
    Hardly anybody understands Einstein.
    And nobody understands Emperor Norton."
    -- Malaclypse the Younger, K.S.C.

  43. Re:What next...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well if I bought a piece of mars and I found a little green man lying on it, I'd do what any good self repecting American would do. I'd pull out my colt .45 and make quick work of Mr. Martian. Then I'd punt his head over the nearest cluster of rocks. Reality is nothing but your own perception puttin order to things that have none. The real world is not WYSIWYG.

  44. Now they've done it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've taken capitalism too far!

    1. Re:Now they've done it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok This is Crap they cant do that in 1967 there was something called the intersteller treatry with prevented anyone from claming tetory in space this is a scame! Dont buy it ! A friend

  45. The World's Oldest Profession by FeeDBaCK · · Score: 2

    Good... Now I can finally fulfill my plans to bring prostitution to space. I bet that would get people interested in space travel. ;]

    Actually, I would like to see who bites onto this one and starts buying up chunks of the moon.

    --
    wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
    1. Re:The World's Oldest Profession by e-gold · · Score: 2

      To be serious for a second (since this is old, and the comment I'm replying to is already
      rated "funny," I doubt anyone reads what I'm about to say anyway) I think that weightless
      sex will be the first commercially viable harnessing of space. Anyone who has done it in a
      pool knows the benefits of escaping gravity, and the drawbacks of pools are legion (going
      far beyond the possibility of drowning if you're not careful!).

      I don't know if anyone noticed, but when NASA sent a husband and wife team up, almost
      all media questions were directed to those 2. Sadly for the USA, I think the Russians beat
      us on that one, though I haven't heard any claims to the "MileS High Club" from them. As
      one of the astronauts said, "gravity sucks," so I expect this development to happen, but
      probably as a honeymoon thing rather than a slutty prostitute thing, within my lifetime.
      JMR

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  46. Re:AIBO owns the Moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Lack of food, fuel, and oxygen.

    What if someone put all 10,000 of those AIBO dogs there, with heat/cold sheilding, and some solar powered batteries? Would the AIBO dogs, or their owner own the moon?

  47. Space Law blocks development of space by Big+Electric+Cat · · Score: 3
    I think you've find that, in this case as in many others, possession is nine tenths of the law. After all, if you went there and declared autonomy, who would come stop you?

    Well, I'm fundamentally dependent on Earth for resupply, and I'm quite vulnerable to attack. But there's a much more fundamental problem then that: Because the Outer Space Use treaty and related international law prevent any nation from making a territorial claim in space, private organizations are effectively blocked from going anywhere. We worry about this often over on sci.space.policy and everywhere in the space-advocacy community.

    The gist is this: suppose I'm a company that sees some value in putting up a moonbase, or maybe I'm the Artemis Project. I need to put, let's say, $10 billion into accomplishing that. Unfortunately, I'm trying to build something that has no protections whatsoever under national or international law. How do I convince investors this is a good bet? How do I value off-planet property as a corporate asset in an IPO, when I can't even determine legally what my property is? How do I insure against accident? Insurers like to have a really specific notion of what they're getting into. If the Department of Defense decides they need my moonbase more than I do, am I protected by eminent domain laws, or not?

    Remember, I'm not just the 6 guys up on the moon protecting their property rights by lobbing rocks at the Capitol building; I'm also the enormous organization back on the ground that got them there. Lack of law makes my life very, very difficult back on Earth.

    The folks down at SpaceDev (http://www.spacedev.com) are running a private research mission to an asteroid, and their chances of making it look pretty good right now. If they do, Jim Benson (their CEO) has said he expects to lay claim to it as property. Moved to Earth, its mineral value is probably in the tens of trillions of dollars. Should he get to keep it? We obviously need a system where entrepeneurs get to keep the fruits of their labor, or no one will ever bother with space- as most people aren't bothering now, in the absence of that system. But we don't want people making enormous claims based on minor accomplishments, either, and at some point any large development in space is going to be more than just property; it'll be a nation, or at least a city, too. How do we structure law to enable this, and can we get any new treaty past China's veto anyway? I'd love to hear some new geek ideas.

    1. Re:Space Law blocks development of space by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1
      Here's one idea:

      At first, while the concepts are getting worked out, don't worry about property claims in space. It costs a million to get you to the Moon, it's going to cost a million to get someone who wants to steal something from you to the Moon. It's usually not worth it, and anyone who actually spends enough to steal something from you up there is going to irk a few of the Powers That Be down here, treaty be damned.

      So, how do you enforce claims? Salvage. Anything that you return to Earth immediately goes under normal property law, just as if, say, a meteorite (even a zero-g-constructed, medicine producing meteorite) had landed in your back yard. It'd be your rock, just like any rock you pick up.

  48. Re:I own a piece of the Moon by athmanb · · Score: 1

    This doesn't seem all that professional. I haven't got the slightest idea what a northeast corner of a world map is. If they produce such deeds they should at least make it look like somewhat professional.

  49. I want the... by Jimhotep · · Score: 1

    I want the "face" on Mars. Should be
    worth millions to my great grand children!

    1. Re:I want the... by mcrandello · · Score: 1

      While I can't get there to verify this (/.ed), my roomate visited there a while back and said that the sight where the landings occurred on the moon, the face on mars and certain other noted landmarks were not being offered for sale.

      I just thought about this-the poster who said something about billboard space...one could rent their space out to corporations...how big would a billboard have to be up there before it could be visible with a sears-tasco telecope? I hear 20$ gets you 2k acres...


      mcrandello@my-deja.com
      rschaar{at}pegasus.cc.ucf.edu if it's important.

  50. Re:Property for sale... by mykey2k · · Score: 1

    I thought it was funny. Then again I got a kick out of Married with Children and ribald shows like that on the tele.

    -m

  51. and you thought *that* was a good scam by Sidlon · · Score: 1
    Check out SpaceLand.net, where they've apparently bought a few 2000-acre plots from Lunar Embassy and are re-selling it at 3 pounds/acre. (what's that in $ anyone?)

    Another old favorite is the Martian Consulate page. When they opened, they had a pyramid scheme going. Once you bought land, you could refer friends (read "spam the UseNet with your referral #") and get a percentage of what they pay for their Martian plots, as well as any people they referred, etc. It doesn't look like they're promoting that program anymore, but the order form still asks for your referral number.

  52. import/export laws by eries · · Score: 2

    What's the NSA going to say about importing new Martian encryption technology? Or, heaven forbid, providing the new superadvancedaliens with 128-bit DES :)

  53. Moon by viking099 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, man! I wanna buy the big red spot on Jupiter!
    "When the Earth hits your eyes, like a big pizza pie, that's amore'" heh... cool.

    1. Re:Moon by Bastian · · Score: 1

      except that the red spot is an atmosphereic anomaly and is always moving.

      You'd be as well off trying to buy El Nino.

    2. Re:Moon by viking099 · · Score: 1

      Yeah!

      I'll buy El Nino, and La Nina, too!

      Where are the papers?

      heh... I know that the Big Red Spot is an

      anomoly, and I also know that it's said that our entire earth can fit inside it...

      Now THAT's what I call real estate!

    3. Re:Moon by Pascal+Q.+Porcupine · · Score: 2

      Well, the same can be said about the whole planet. :)
      ---
      "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.

      --
      "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
      Quine "quine?
  54. No one "owns" the Moon by morbid · · Score: 1

    Before the first human moon landings a treaty was ratified that stated that no nation would own the Moon, and that it would be freely available for scientific exploration to anyone that wanted it.

    I would imagine that the same applies to all of the other planets,since the cost of getting there far outweighs the (present) commercial rewards.

    As for the asteroids, comets and, dare I say it, other _stars_, a similar rule would apply. After all, what hard-headed, capit(a/o)l driven buisness person in this day and age would throw away those sums of money?

    No, anyone who goes "out there" will do so in the name of science and exploration first.

    It will be at leat 50 years until we see the Moon being exploited for commercial gain.

    Low Earth Orbit.. that's another story.. Give it 5 years until the well-heeled will be going there.

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  55. We own you! by Ektanoor · · Score: 1

    What if anyone from Outer Space comes up and says this words?

    Silly yeah?
    But the unfortunate thing is that this already happened. 500 years ago another guy claimed for the crown of Spain a several islands in what was supposed to be the End of the World. And he created a precedent, that, until the beginning of this century, was an epidemia turned one of the greatest tragedies of Mankind. Even the democratic, pluralist and liberal United States of America did not avoid this train. Even now we have a few islands that came into possession of the US through such procedure.
    No one asked the people of these lands what did they think of the fact that they belonged to anyone else. No one cared if these lands were completely desertic or had civilizations much older than their new "owners". On the contrary. Every european, asian or american power used all its means to "prove" such ownerships through Ironclad policies. And every resitence or rebellion had to face a terrible fate.

    No matter these agreements or treaties, the first space powers (the real ones, those who will start up Space colonisation, if one gets the guts to do it) will just leave them on the shelf. And they will not take a damn about these Outer Space Real Estate dealers. All this is just snake oil. It is playing with everyone who wishes to become Colombus or Lord Sandwich (yeah, it seems there was such a guy). Btw, these new Pizarros and Corteses are doing a silly and unethical play.

    The Moon is probably much worser then Mojave or Skeleton beach since its beginning. Mars is probably in a RIP status for quite a long time. Yeah Europe could have some bacteria inside. But I also heard that these unreal estaters sell stars, pieces of galaxy or even whole galaxies.

    A warning. The next terminal station can be 10, 100 or 100000000 light years from us. BUT IT IS THERE. No matter we know or don't know about it. And we don't know how alien humour reacts to human dumbiness. Sincerly Clinton once said some harsh words about Mars. Luck no one's there now. But even for a human his words could be measured as highly offensive. To understand the level of what he said there is only the need to change the word "Mars" with any US foe or less friendly state. Had he messed a word (like Reagan once did) and that would be very serious diplomatic trouble.

    You may think this sounds silly. Well NO ONE seems to be out there... For now, and here... But if IT IS out there? Or even here and now? What do you think he thinks about us and these stupidities?

  56. International Agreement? by Speef · · Score: 2

    I thought there was an international agreement to prevent territory wars that said that no country or person could lay claim to land outside of earth? This would seem to be in violation of that...

    1. Re:International Agreement? by orac2 · · Score: 4
      The agreement in question is the Outer Space Treaty and it's been around since 1967. The US, the UK and Russia were founder signatories. The most relevant piece here is "outer space is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means".

      So, even if its not technically illegal to claim a piece of the Moon or Mars as your real estate in the US, the claim has no force outside the jurisdiction of the US, and the US is forbidden from extending it's sovereign territory into space. So it's pretty worthless having a claim on the Sea of Tranquility if your claim isn't actually valid there...

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    2. Re:International Agreement? by binarybits · · Score: 3

      This is a silly article, but it points to an important issue: property rights in outer space.

      Contrary to the handwringing of most slashdotters, property rights in outer space is a good thing. People are not goingto invest the time and effort to get out there and build something useful on extraterrestrial bodies unless they think they can be sure they will reap the benefits.

      Property rights are not a threat to space exploration. They are of utmost importance if mankind is to develop beyond the Earth. As nice as "sharing" sounds, it's not what drives progress. Mankind is driven forward by the expectation of material gain, and by the assurance that they will be free to dispose of the fruits of their labor.

      Therefore, international treaties making outer space into a glorified national park should be repealed. As long as they are enforced, space exploration will be harmed.

  57. Futurama by greenfly · · Score: 1

    "As long as you don't ask me to smell Uranus."

    "We don't call it that anymore, astronomers changed the name in the 2200's to avoid that little joke."

    "Oh really? What's it called now?"

    "Urectum."

  58. Re:What next...? by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2

    I can say to you that I will sell you a spot on Mars, but if (someday) you could go to that little spot that I said you own and you find little green men living there, it is no longer thiers?

    More or less. At least, that's the way it worked when we screwed over the American Indians.

    I would like to sell people little glass vacuum spheres. Then you can say you own nothing, and it is something!

    In all seriousness, that's not a bad idea for a novelty gift.


    Berlin-- http://www.berlin-consortium.org
    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  59. Re:MS Mars, MS Moon... by GaspodeTheWonderDog · · Score: 2

    Does that mean that people will then suffer Venus envy?

    --
    This space for sale
  60. Slashdot Mirror! by gregstoll · · Score: 2

    I'm gonna host the first Slashdot mirror on the moon! Of course, it will be a little slow, but think of the media coverage!

    1. Re:Slashdot Mirror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just dont run a Quake server too, the ping times will be horrendous.

  61. Neutral Zone?! by Cebert · · Score: 1

    > If I recall correctly, the moon is a neutral
    > zone.

    WHAT? We must have been desprate to risk war with the ROMULANS!!

    ;)

    Seriously though, the idea of any one country "claiming" anything outside of the planet is pretty sickening. Unforunately, while the major countries seem to have restraint, I can certainly see some of the smaller war-like nations trying to claim it for themselves. :/

    --
    -- www.bteg.com | bleh.n3.net | hac47.dhs.org
    1. Re:Neutral Zone?! by phil+reed · · Score: 1
      (1) The guy selling property on the moon probably doesn't have the legal right to sell it - he doesn't own it, nor does he represent the owners. (There probably aren't any.)

      (B) This reminds me of Swatch's recent effort to 'bring people together' by violating international communications law (a satellite transmitting in a reserved frequency).

      (III) Is this an effort to bring people together or to make some money? I'm all for noble efforts, but how do we know (especially considering (1) above) that this really isn't a cynical way of separating money from people?


      ...phil

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    2. Re:Neutral Zone?! by Cebert · · Score: 1

      : No one said that the USA owned the moon.

      Re-read my post. I merely said that the IDEA of a specific country laying claim to non-earthly 'real estate' was unappealing.

      : Check the facts!

      I mentioned nothing about this person and his attempts to peddle lunar land from afar.

      --
      -- www.bteg.com | bleh.n3.net | hac47.dhs.org
    3. Re:Neutral Zone?! by kimber1162 · · Score: 1

      No one said that the USA owned the moon. The man who is selling property on the moon just happens to be from the US. At this point in time the moon is owned by people from 127 countries, most of the owners are from Germany, Sweden, and the US. If you take the time to look into the Lunar Embassy, you might see that it is a really cool idea, and it is bringing people from all over this planet together in a way that only open minded people would understand. Check the facts!

  62. Straight from the Lunar FAQ. by jelwell · · Score: 3
    Straight from the Lunar FAQ.

    Do you believe in the Prime Directive?
    Answer
    We do. Really. It's more than just a silly rule, but more a philosophy to life. We feel, we all must learn to respect all life, no matter what it looks like or where it came from. Our team has several Star Trek fans, mainly TNG tho, so please don't ask them about what Kirk did in episode 27. Their favorite Trek episodes are The Inner Light (TNG), although the Borg ones as well as All Good Things, rank right up there amongst the top ever, surely. Ah. They don't make them like they used to. Please note, that in honour of Star Trek VIII:"First Contact", the next two Lunar Cities will be named "Tycho-City" and "New-Berlin" as mentioned in the film. Our message is: Live now, because now, will never come again.

    What happened to "Live long and prosper"? Who's the star trek fan?
    Joseph Elwell.

    1. Re:Straight from the Lunar FAQ. by Enoch+Root · · Score: 1
      What happened to "Live long and prosper"?

      Oh, that's their philosophy. Especially the "prosper" bit.
      "Knowledge = Power = Energy = Mass"

  63. development costs by gotan · · Score: 1

    There's a much easier, more legal way to do get people of 'their' land: when somebody starts to build infrastructure on the moon they probably may charge owners of 'developped' properties with development costs. Now that's a bill i don't want to pay ...

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  64. Re:the flag... by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    Just a side comment, that the flag appears to be blowing in the wind in the various moon photos. Of course, with no atmosphere, this means that the astronauts just unfurled the flag and with only 1/6 gravity, it sort of 'sticks' temporarily.

    Actually, the moon flags are kept unfurled by wires hemmed into their edges.

    Any flag durable enough to survive any length of time on the moon is going to be too heavy to float as you describe. Anyway, the kind of floating you're talking about relies on air resistance, which is in rather short supply up there.

  65. Re:the flag... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

    A remark on your side comment: No, the flag does not "stick" in 1/6th Earth gravity, at least not for an appreciable moment. The flags on the moon simply had a steel (or more likely aluminium) rod reinforcing the upper edge!

    --

    Stephan

  66. Re:Uh-huh, right. by jnik · · Score: 2

    It would be much easier to take Harriman to court for the price of those stamps which never actually flew. Might win that way.

  67. Re:Novelty value only by rde · · Score: 1

    Not to be a pedantic bastard, but it's Alludium q-36 explosive space modulator.
    Okay, I'm a pedantic bastard.

  68. Re:Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, Terran Branch by ewhac · · Score: 1

    No, he'd need at least three medium-sized planets, which will be just barely enough room to house the Complaints Department.

    "Go Stick Your Head in a Pig,"
    Schwab

  69. Re:Outer Space Treaty by jareds · · Score: 1
    This means you can't claim the treaty doesn't apply to you because you aren't affiliated with a national government. Anything you do in space falls under the jurisdiciton of some country.

    Huh? What country would that be, exactly? If a company in a non-signatory nation built a base on the moon and claimed property rights by homesteading to the area where the base was, what exactly would the State Parties to the Treaty do?

    What gave the signatories of the treaty the right to decide what can or can't be done on the moon by those not subject to their sovreignty?

    Of course, the "deeds" being sold by the Lunar Embassy are completely bunk, as they themselves say, but that is not because ownership of lunar property is inherently unlawful.

  70. Re:Novelty value only by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
    Uh, maybe you didn't understand. Yes, it's there to protect from lawsuits. The way it protects from lawsuits is to dispel any impression that it's a real deed to real property.

    I liked the joke postings better. Can I turn it in for a pound of green cheese?

    Bruce

  71. UNIX time() of course! by apsmith · · Score: 1

    On my Gnome desktop clock it says "941068549" right now. If they make a day 10^5 seconds that would give us a nice extra 3.7777 hours to get our work done (ok, our /. reading) done too...

    Put little dots at the 1000 day and 100 second marks and you get

    Stardate 9.410.688.31

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

    1. Re:UNIX time() of course! by PurpleBob · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my idea for "Extended Internet Time". Internet Time is a good idea that Swatch just happened to use to sell cheesy watches... it's a metric time system where the day is divided into 1000 "beats", which respectively consist of 100 "centibeats", which are each .864 of a second. The Internet Time as I type this is @147.08

      The problem is that Internet Time clocks (mostly found as computer programs) use the normal date system, which makes even less sense than our time system. Because Internet Time has no time zones, the date changes at some arbitrary point during the ITime day.

      I propose Extended Internet Time, which includes a metric date before the @.
      Extended Internet Time would include a date consisting of the number of days (yes, 24-hour solar days, I'm leaving these alone) since 1970 (or maybe some other significant year), with a , inserted for readability and to set apart units of 1000 days that would act like years. It would wreck the concept of years as defined by the sun, but oh well.
      It would change at @000 internet time.

      The complete Extended Internet Time is now 10,892@152.11. Of course this could be abbreviated to 892@152, 892@, @152, or even 2@152 (it's assumed to be the current 10-day "week" - if it really was day 2 of the year, it would be 002@152). I can tell someone "hey, log onto microsoft.com on 3@400, I'm going to hack their main page." (Not that this is the kind of thing I do.)

      I'm not getting my hopes up that people will use this, though I'd like to see it as an option for Slashdot's time format :)
      --

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  72. .COM?????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that be lunarembassy.INT???? or at least a new country code..

  73. Antartica? by mplex · · Score: 1

    So who owns that land. What is they someday discover huge oil reserves or anything valuable. I wouldnt mind picking up some cheap property there. Seriously, whats the deal with it. Does anyone own it, control it or what. I know there are scientist from all over the world there but other than that...

    1. Re:Antartica? by Dr+Vandenzob · · Score: 1

      It is split between countries. Some map will show cute little segments, like the only one I remember is "Terre Adelie" for France and there is a Japanese bit and misc other United Nation thingies. Why, preparing a tax exile?

  74. Re:MS Mars, MS Moon... by Bastian · · Score: 1

    MS Moon could be dangerous! In about 5 years it would bloat to such considerable size that it would consume Terra!

  75. Property has no value unless you can defend it by Skipio · · Score: 1
    Yeah, the company can perhaps legally sell land on the Moon and Mars but is the ownership of some real estate in outer space really worth anything unless you can defend it? If you can't defend your property you don't really own it. How would you stop anyone from just taking your land? You can't. We can just look at history and see for example how the white people kicked the Indians off their own land because the Indian couldn't defend it well enough. And the Indians at least had spears and arrows. If you would buy some real estate on the Moon you wouldn't have anything except that single piece of paper stating that you own that area. But who would ever care about that piece of paper? You could perhaps argue that the government would defend your land in outer space, just like it does here on Earth, but would the US government really spend millions of dollars to stop someone from stealing your property on the Moon? I think not.

    Perhaps I'm just taking this just a little bit too seriously :)

    1. Re:Property has no value unless you can defend it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always use the paper and inflict massive paper cuts on those that take you land...

  76. I own a piece of the Moon by bolind · · Score: 1

    I actually own a piece of the moon.

    Quoting from my "Martian Deed":

    Area I-32, Quadrant Echo 1, Lot Number 844
    This property is located 029 squares south and 004 squares east of the extreme northwest corner of the recognized Martian chart.

    Seriously, I have a piece of the moon from this company. It was given to me by a friend of mine a year or two back. He thought it was hilarious, and I found it quite amusing myself.

    It does say: "this is a novelty gift".

    I wish I could put up a scan, but I don't have a scanner nearby...

    1. Re:I own a piece of the Moon by slickwillie · · Score: 1

      I'd say you own a piece of Mars, not the moon.

  77. This should be filed under "humor"... by JoeyLemur · · Score: 2

    According to international law, the UN, etc. etc... the Moon is not owned by any one entity, and therefore, having someone "selling" territory on it is impossible.

    Its all kinda pointless until we actually manage to actually establish a viable colony, anyway...

    1. Re:This should be filed under "humor"... by palop · · Score: 1

      Welll havent you seen that educational film they show in school.

      ".... experts say that by 1965 we will have one dozen moon colonies...
      the moon belongs to america and its brave astromen...."
      or however that educational film went in that simpsons episode.
      palop

  78. What is the TLD for the Moon? by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

    Will ICANN handle domain name registration for the .moon .venus .mars etc. domains? Or will they be assigned standard ISO 3166 codes?

    I know that .io (which might be a good TLD for banks and other lending institutions) is already assigned to the British Indian Ocean Territories, so they will have to have a less intuitive domain, unless moons are only given second level domain names under the planet around which they revolve. This would mean that our moon would have to be given the .moon.earth domain or the .luna.earth domain.

    By the way, did you know there are already 247 ISO 3166 codes assigned? That means that we are almost 40% of the way to assigning every possible 2-letter abbreviation available.

    1. Re:What is the TLD for the Moon? by hadron · · Score: 1

      ISO 3166 codes are assigned to countries, territories, etc. Presumably, if an American moon colony is set up, it will be classified as "United States Minor Outlying Islands", and given ".um". If it declares independence, it can apply to the ISO 3166 maintainers for a code, but what code it will get will depend heavily upon it's name.

  79. mmm... mooooon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should release moon as GPL!

  80. Better than cracking MS by Ryanwoodings · · Score: 1

    Or maybe you could write "Carrie is cute" instead of cracking MS to write it on their homepage. I'm sure your girlfriend would love that!!!! (more than the chocolate and flowers)

  81. Re:Future Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not see on what ground you say that it is 'likely' for space travel to be privatized. Mining asteroids ? bwahahaha do you know that a substantial portion of the earth's oil reserves are not exploited because too difficult to access and not too costly to exploit ?

  82. outer space treaty by zerone · · Score: 1

    well, old glory (the american flag) is probably still stuck into the lunar cheeseball, nevertheless. And sorry i lost the (off topic) link, but there was a great nytimes article re: the uncle spam's militarization of outer space.. You can bet the pentagon outspends anyone else to dominate space and assure security of communication/surveillance satellites, regardless of any warm and fuzzy OST.. in fact, there's an arm of the mighty us military called "Space Command".

  83. Re:LINUX--Lets not spell linux this is cooler by SirStanley · · Score: 1

    heheh. That episode was just replayed on Com Central on Sunday... Question though.... Why not just modify the man on the moon so its the face of Larry Wall? Come one that would Kick Butt!

    --
    --------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
  84. Skip the moon...... by blogan · · Score: 1

    I'd want one of the really really really small comets. Imagine building a house that only has a front. The entire hallway loops around the planet.....of course, it would have to be really dense to provide adaquate gravity.

  85. Mining Claims to Asteroids For Sale! Cheap! by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1

    While we're selling unenforceable title deeds to real estate on solar system bodies, nonexistent bridges on Io and bogus naming rights to stars in the night sky, I have an offer of my own....

    FOR SALE BY TENDER - ASTEROID MINING RIGHTS

    I have for sale exclusive mining claims to seven choice asteroids. These asteroids, with sizes ranging from three to eight kilometres in diameter, are composed almost entirely of metals (chiefly iron and nickel) and would be an extremely profitable investment for the discerning terrestrial mining company that is looking to expand its operations to a new and exciting field of operations. Of particular interest is that each asteroid has an abundance of trace metals that are scarce on Earth, such as iridium and osmium. This is your opportunity to corner the market in these and similar rare metals.

    Stake your claim now! Tenders close 31/3/2000.

    And if you believe that, then remember this: There's a sucker born every minute. You're it.


    --

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  86. bring on the jokes.. by cheese63 · · Score: 1

    about how they're selling stakes in "uranus"

    sorry if this was already said, i wasn't paying any attention

  87. Old Hat by quonsar · · Score: 1
    Back in 1997 or so I stumbled over this guy selling acreage on Mars. I've had mine ever since. :-)

    ======
    "Cyberspace scared me so bad I downloaded in my pants." --- Buddy Jellison

  88. Better than cracking MS by Ryanwoodings · · Score: 1

    Or maybe you could write "Carrie is cute" instead of cracking MS to write it on their homepage. I'm sure your girlfriend would love that!!!! (more than the chocolate and flowers)

    BTW - Any Boise, ID BeOS users out there?

  89. Want a bridge on Io? Real cheap! by Enoch+Root · · Score: 2
    If I remember correctly, real estate on other planets and the moon has been sold for quite some time now. The rationale is that, whereas governments are not allowed to own planetary bodies, there is nothing preventing individuals to own them.

    How do you take ownership of a patch of the Moon, then? Well, back in the old days (i.e., the Renaissance), you went there with a Government-sponsored team and claimed the land in the name of a nation. You then stacked it up with soldiers to make sure no one contradicts your claim.

    So, if you buy a land on the Moon, how are you going to go there and claim it, much less defend it against invasion?

    The simple fact of the matter is, you can't. And Governments will let you dream on about your little patch of Moon property until they decide otherwise.

    In the meantime, people are giving money away, mostly because they think it's fun. But if you think that's much fun, there's a nice bridge for sale on Io. Just give me a call.
    "Knowledge = Power = Energy = Mass"

  90. Simpsons by Pope · · Score: 1

    Remember the film that Lisa was watching about The Moon?

    "The moon belongs to America, and anxiously awaits the arrival of our astro-men. Will you be among them?"

    P

    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  91. Re:This is nonsense by coreybrenner · · Score: 1

    And here I thought Heinlein had it right when he called them "Loonies" (luna - the Moon).

    --Corey

    --
    Not only will they not deserve liberty or safety, Mr. Franklin, they will be DENIED both!
  92. Re:the flag... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
    Secondarily, it's kinda hard to blow a flag down without an atmosphere to sustain a wind, dontcha think? ;-)
    Well, a rocket exhaust is a "wind", and its gas constitutes at "atmosphere" for whatever's in its influence. That's what blew down the flag left by the Apollo 11 mission. FWIW, each LEM left a number of tons of nitrogen and water vapor on the moon during its descent, landing and ascent. IIRC, this temporarily multiplied the normal lunar atmosphere several-fold, until the solar wind and UV drove the molecules to escape velocity and they flew off never to return.
    --
    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  93. Hunka hunka burnin Sun. by Cebert · · Score: 1

    Screw the moon, I want a piece of the Sun! I got plans for that baby: a super deluxe sized Motel-6! It'll be hot!

    --
    -- www.bteg.com | bleh.n3.net | hac47.dhs.org
  94. reality by nahtanoj · · Score: 1

    You think you can sell the intergalatic realestate? You fools! Were you not at the Symposium at MK 451? It was there that these things were settled. For your information, it is I who own this sector, as well as Andromeda, the Pleides Cluster, and the Galatic Core. Keep up this farce, and I will be forced to authorize a "cleaning" job on this puny world you inhabit. That will be all.

  95. Outer Space Treaty by vlax · · Score: 3

    "TREATY ON PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF STATES IN THE EXPLORATION AND USE OF OUTER SPACE, INCLUDING THE MOON AND OTHER CELESTIAL BODIES" from http://www.acda.gov/treaties/outspace.htm .

    The United States signed this treaty on the 27th of January, 1967 and deposited an instrument of ratification on the 10th of October, 1967 - making this treaty US law. As far as I can tell, all the countries with a reasonable chance of having a space programme have signed and ratified it, including China, which agreed to the treaty in 1983.

    What does this treaty have to say about property on the moon?

    Article I, para 2

    Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall be free for exploration and use by all States without discrimination of any kind, on a basis of equality and in accordance with international law, and there shall be free access to all areas of celestial bodies.


    This means you can't keep anyone off of your lunar claim. You can't keep them from building or prospecting or from exercising any other right you have to some strip of land either. Under those conditions, what good does a deed do you?

    Article II

    Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.


    This means that no nation can claim exclusive jurisdiction over the moon or any part of it, and that makes it basically impossible to obtain a deed that other countries would consider binding.

    Article VI

    States Parties to the Treaty shall bear international responsibility for national activities in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, whether such activities are carried on by governmental agencies or by non-governmental entities, and for assuring that national activities are carried out in conformity with the provisions set forth in the present Treaty. The activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty. When activities are carried on in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, by an international organization, responsibility for compliance with this Treaty shall be borne both by the international organization and by the States Parties to the Treaty participating in such organization.


    This means you can't claim the treaty doesn't apply to you because you aren't affiliated with a national government. Anything you do in space falls under the jurisdiciton of some country.

    In short, a deed to the moon, an asteroid, or anything else in space is completely worthless so long as this treaty is in force.

  96. Re:Damn it, don't give it away! by webslacker · · Score: 2

    I almost made a killing on eBay selling my moon property, and now you had to inform everyone. Thanks a bunch.

  97. A great gift if it cost less than $30 by umoto · · Score: 1

    I would love to give a deed to all my friends for Christmas if only I could get a plot for $10. It would be a great gift!

  98. Re:Novelty value only by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2

    Yes, Marvin and his Illudium Q-36 Space Modulator should be our biggest fear. Forget our claim on the Moon, he'll annihilate us for blocking his view of Venus!
    --

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  99. Squatters Rights by T3kno · · Score: 1

    I hearby claim the 420 square acre parcel of land located in the center of Crater Zeno on the moon as the sole property of me.

    I do not recognize the claim of ownership of the aforementioned moon byThe Lunar Embasy as valid. Furthermore I think that any attempt to sell cheese without the approval of the FDA is a clear violation of the CPA, the PCI, the PDQ, the KMFDM, and the PIOCC (Preconceved Idiots Organization of Cheese Consumers) charters.

    I hereby declare war on any party that attemts to invade my borders and steal my stockpiles of Surge, Bawls, Up Your Gas, Cheetos, and HoHo's. Any attempt to infiltrate my fortress will be met by severe resistance by my minions of nacho hucking penguins. Resistance is futile. In case you are wondering I am going to return to earth on the 2nd of January with my minions of Penguins and my hoards of surge and take over the powerless computerless earth with promises of an OS that doesnt crash. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  100. CHA by leoc · · Score: 2

    Think of the advertising possibilities! Chairface chippendale would be proud!

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  101. others info about ET stuff you cannot owned by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    like buying a name for a star of whatever, you can give someone money for it, but it's not approved at all, bummer! see the FAQ at International Astronomical Union
    --

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  102. Re:Property for sale... by cheese63 · · Score: 1

    nah, but am i the only one that thought this was funny? probably because of my lack of taste.

  103. Personal note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The White man" did not take land from the aboriginal(sp?) americans. Some white people in some govermants did.
    I am white I nor anyone in my family tree, as far as I can tell, took anything from any Indian, ever.
    This may seem a little touchy but I am getting real tired of having guilt piled on me for something that happened when NO ONE alive today was alive then.
    One more commercial about how we owe it to the indians to let them bring gambling to the state and I'm going to go ballistic.

    Perhaps I'm just taking this just a little bit too seriously :)

    1. Re:Personal note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be joking right? and i suppose you hold no grudges against the germans for starting ww2, or hold no disgust for the atrocities that were commited then? history does not disapear....it haunts the ppl who learn it

  104. treaty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people have metioned various "Space treaties" Lets see how long those treaties are honored when A cheap, quick, and dependable method of space travel is invented.

  105. Re:Novelty value only by talon · · Score: 1

    Don't forget it's an Illudium Q-36 EXPLODING Space Modulator. :)

    --

    --

    --
    talon - Oh no, more Slashdotters!
  106. OK who downed the Server here??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to buy me a little peice of the heavens and the damn serve has crashed.... Can't all the people who read slashdot go one at a time over a few months so more than 2% of us can see the site!

  107. Re:What time zone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't know exactly what time it is and where you are, you will never get there.

  108. nope by evilWurst · · Score: 1

    Well, international treaties state that no country can own territory in space (this is a gross summary of the law, and unfortunately I can't find the text of it...but if you happen to have a copy of Larry Niven's "N-Space" it a much better summary is in there somewhere).
    By extension of that law, it follows that no organizations or citizens can own territory in space either. Too easy to cheat that way; a person or organization could acquire property, then let their country use the property anyway. Or some such thing like that. It'd be too easy to abuse, and would spoil the point of the treaty (mainly it was to stop anyone from launching nukes from there, but there are other reasons just as important).
    Even if it WAS legal to own property in space, wouldn't you have to follow common rules anyway? I doubt any of the sellers (or buyers) involved here have physically gone there and planted their flag to make a claim, eh? =)

    evilWurst
    ...however, I *DO* have a nice villa reserved on the bloodriver. You don't want to know what it cost me...

  109. Re:Novelty value only by CodeShark · · Score: 1
    ...joke mode ON...

    Whew!! For a minute there I thought we were facing the imminent destruction of planet earth by extremely angry SEBs (Superpowerful Extraterristrial Beings)

    "They think they bought my what???? Why those irritating little humans. I'll just have to teach them a lesson in humility..."

    Next thing ya'know, KABOOM!!

    ...joke mode OFF...

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  110. Already been done by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    Since www.lunarembassy.com has apparently been /.'d I'll go ahead and post without reading the article.

    In the 1970's there was a guy who made his living by going around the college circuit selling deeds for 1 acre parcels on the moon for $1. He was dressed in boots, cape, etc all spray-painted silver. I bought 1 acre. I hope I won't have to kick off any claim jumpers from this upstart Lunar Embassy.

  111. Resale Value by Mr_Plow · · Score: 1

    Not a very good investment. The ROI is low, and the likelihood of being able to resell in your lifetime is pretty bad, too. About as responsible as investing in profitless .com companies.
    -------------------------------------- --------------------

    1. Re:Resale Value by Merlin_Z · · Score: 1

      Actually, The moon _would_ be a good investment!
      I am surprised that this hasn't been mentioned already, but the lunar soil has trapped large amounts of Helium-3 from the solar "wind" over the long ages of its existence. The same material is comparitively rare here thanks to our strong magnetic field, and Helium-3, IIRC, would make a good fuel for a fusion reaction. So once we develop fusion rocket engines, the moon will be a big gas station in high earth orbit!!!

      We'll see how long that UN treaty lasts then, before some multi-planetary corp. or large govt. decides to build a big strip mining operation on the moon.

      --
      "Let me control a planet's oxygen supply and I don't care who makes the laws" -Great Cthulu's Starry Wisdom Band
    2. Re:Resale Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, just because a company doesn't make profit doesn't mean that its stock is a bad investment. This can be seen by a lot of the newer IPOs that really arn't for anything big or money-making, rather small and internet based. Just so you know.

  112. Re:"Its all just little bits of history repeating" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word is out, there's a new style growing... but it doesn't know if it's coming or going. They say the next big thing is here, that the revolution's near. But to me it seems quite clear -- That it's all just a bit of history repeating.

  113. Lay Claim by quux26 · · Score: 2

    Pardon the segue, but...

    We're talking about a very long-term venture here. Space, once we get rolling, will be our future. So while a "no private ownership" creed might be conforting and viable now, it will not hold up for long.

    And what a wonderful way to discourage private industry from going! "You can own chunks of a finite resource down here but don't even think of laying claim to a speck of infinity." What breed of political bullshit is this??

    Glad nobody in the fifteenth century tried this nonsense...

    My .02
    Quux26

    --

    My .02
    Quux26
    www.crashspace.net
  114. Re:the flag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    'Xcuse me, but if I remember right, the Eagle LEM(Apollo 11 Lunar Excursion Module, the part of the ship that actually lands on the moon) wasn't the only Apollo mission that involved placing a U.S. Flag on the moon.

    Secondarily, it's kinda hard to blow a flag down without an atmosphere to sustain a wind, dontcha think? ;-)

  115. What time zone? by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 5
    The killer question:
    What time zone will it be in?

    There is a tendancy to use UTC in space applications; if people start dispersing to the moon, this provides some time delay issues in communications that would result in sync issues; heading further afield to Mars would be similarly disruptive to synchronization of activities.

    It's possible that one might get meaningful information out of a GPS unit from the moon, albeit with extremely screwy coordinates as they'd be relative to the earth. (Mind you, it is probable that consumer units would shut down as you'd be moving more than 999mph relative to earth's surface...)

    Determining time/location will provide opportunities for new fields in vCards and for a bunch of new RFCs. I thought there was one on this, but in querying the archives, I seem to be mistaken...

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  116. Future Predictions by MrEfficient · · Score: 1

    You know, this particular situation is all pretty hilarious, but it reminds me of a more serious issue. Something I heard awhile ago about corporations someday owning property in space. It is a very likely scenario that space travel will be privatized in the future. In fact, I would say its the most likely. There is alot of potential profit in mining asteroids, the moon, other planets or whatnot. What will stop corporations from claiming these objects for themselves. Its not a problem now, but I hope that in the future, the governments of the world work together to ensure that the common man doesn't lose out. I mean, I'm very thankful that there are national parks and other public lands which I and other people who can't afford land can use. I would like to see space developed for the good of everyone, not just to further line the pockets of the already very rich. I'm not saying that there isn't a place for privately held property, I'm all for it, but I believe in taking most everything in moderation. Everything shouldn't just be up for grabs.

    --
    Check out AbiWord.
  117. Tell that Klingon battle cruiser what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    And when the Klingon battle cruiser tells you it's not your land and the deed is worthless, what will your reply be?

    A guide to Klingon programming

  118. Paying for Claims by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Property rights are founded on insurance against loss of those rights. This costs money. Call the costs "taxation" or "insurance premiums" -- the choice is yours.

    If you insist on taxation, then a net asset tax is most appropriate.

    A NAT prevents "squatting" on any frontier, be it "cybersquatting" or specious claims of title to real estate in outter space.

  119. Nope, the NSA did it... by vlax · · Score: 2

    ...using an early model super-computer. Yup, the whole moonshot is CGI. Naturally computers, even super-computers, weren't real good in those days, so to make up for the lack of detail, they made all the footage look grainy. You've seen films from the late 1960's, they don't look grainy! Don't you think if they had really gone to the moon they wouldn't have brought a better camera?

    And they got a young George Lucas to direct it. He was recruted by the CIA during his film school years. That's how he got all the cool ideas for shooting Star Wars.

    This was all proven by the Weekly World News years ago. Get with the programme, dude!

    (For the humour impared, yes, I'm kidding.)

  120. domains by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I better jump on it and get a domain of my own country on another planet. Moon domains... What would they be called? Slashdot.moo sounds interesting. Heck, if all those people can grab .to and .cc domains, why cant i have .mrs for mars domains? Just have to put a server out there first perhaps.

  121. Yes, but a violation of a law is relative... by gvonk · · Score: 1

    I don't believe it violates any moon laws...Because there aren't any! Yes, it violates US and International laws, but do these bodies have jurisdiction in space when you are not, by definition, in their territory?

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  122. Mr. Dennis M. Hope has the right to sell property? by Head+Louse · · Score: 1

    So according to the American government Mr. Dennis M. Hope has the right to sell property. Something tells me when it gets time to start doing things with the moon and other planets we will be doing it on an international front and these things will hold no weight what so ever.

  123. Porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the protential of Pron in low G (1/6th Remember?) Of course 0 G will be better but for those who can't afford the good stuff (0 G Porn) 1/6 G will do.

  124. hmm by Bastian · · Score: 1

    20 minutes and its already slashdotted.

    Personally, I want to see this company get rich just so I can laugh at how many dumb people there are who would actually WANT some real estate on Venus or, say, a gas planet like Neptune.

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps we, or more accurately, slashdot news posters should warn these kinds of sites before it is posted on slashdot. Just so they know what crashed thier server :)...

    2. Re:hmm by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Better yet, Slashdot should offer a mirror of sites that exist on less potent servers at least for the first day the article is up, not just out of fairness to the site owners, but because I HATE trying to go somewhere just to find it's /.ed.

      Hey, maybe the mirrors could go on Geocities, just for the sake of trying to bring them to their knees. . .

  125. What's in it for us? by Dr+Vandenzob · · Score: 1

    Oh come on guys! If you are true geeks then you must always fall in love with the evil genius in the James Band movies. He/she always have the best gear. :> Anyways, "flag up there" or "Luna 7" first you take your pick. I don't think either Russia or the USA left custom officers up there. In the end there is nothing for us in it. Still if these documents held valid legal proof of ownership then here is what geeks of the world could do: We buy the whole lot! Next time there is a mission to Titan, Mars anything we just sue the concerned governement for walking onto private territory. And that holds in court on a daily basis. (unless Irak gets there, then we are kinda... err.. fucked? Nah, we could always strike a deal.) So here: NASA, ESA and the lot. Hear my call. If you wanna land your invasive devices there, you have to pay the landing fee! Nice something like Nasser's taking over the Suez Canal, except I don't think the parras are gonna go all the way up there to take it back.

  126. This is nonsense by hadron · · Score: 1

    The moon is not anyones to sell. When it is colonised and obtains a government, no doubt title deeds will be drawn up and the land allocated in some way : until then, no-one owns it.

    1. Re:This is nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no. Loonies are the non-natives that buy lunar real eastate

    2. Re:This is nonsense by BWS · · Score: 1

      No, you see. I think they got the deeds from the Moonsians?
      Moonsians you ask? well, they are native people of the moon, like Martians from Mars, Moonsians from the Moon. How come we never see them? well, ask Mulder :)

      --
      -- Note: These Comments are Generated by ME! Not You! ME!
  127. Oy by Yebyen · · Score: 1

    5 posts and they're slashdotted already. Is this really the company you want to buy 100 acres of the moon from? lol I haven't read anything from them yet so don't moderate me down or anything, this IS a relevant post

    --
    Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
  128. ISP! by BWS · · Score: 1

    That's it! I am gonna setup my OWN ISP on the Moon. BWS@Work, offering everything from Dialup to OC-3, however, no guarantees on PING times to Earth :)

    --
    -- Note: These Comments are Generated by ME! Not You! ME!
  129. Re:the flag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five other flags still planted, eh? How many, if any are visible, and how powerful of a telescope would you need to see them?

  130. Any need for fences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose that I could just buy a piece of land in a bigass crater (yes, I know-- not one of the *big* craters, they're miles and miles across-- just one of the small ones; an acre or two of land will do me). No need for fences-- people would have to climb up those huge walls and such...

    Seriously, though, does anybody truly think that we'll be living on the moon within the next 60-70 years? Or is it like that whole "The US is switching over to the metric system!" thing all over again-- promises, promises, but it never happens?

    What would be some advantages to living on the moon, anyway? I don't think the ability to slam dunk on a standard basketball hoop counts, either-- I'd wind up getting airsick pretty quickly...

  131. "Its all just little bits of history repeating" by Zombie_Magick · · Score: 4

    ...the northern hemisphere of the universe shall go to Portugal while the southern hemisphere of the universe shall go to Spain

    Haven't we learned about dealing in land that isn't ours, lands that we can't even get to?

    1. Re:"Its all just little bits of history repeating" by jonr · · Score: 1

      "The South America, South-East Asia and Western Europe should be considered under USA influence while Africa and the rest of Asia should be concidered under USSR influence" or something like that.

      Well, obviously not...

      J.

  132. Pathfinder is double parked on my land by CodeMunch · · Score: 1
    and the meter has expired looong ago and I also caught it speeding through one of my amoeba school zones....Mwahahahaha I'm gonna stick it to em for fines.

    Time to pay up NASA!!

    It almost looks as if my gf was driving the Pathfinder last kuz they couldn't parallel park worth a damn.

    --Clay

  133. when will they learn??? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1
    Haven't they read The Moon is a Cruel Mistress? Keep it free! Save us from the revolution!

    *sarcasm off* These are novelty items, their Canon BJC-4400 is just as good as mine, maybe I'll start printing out deeds and charging $100.

    They own the moon about as much as Hale and Bop own a comet and A.C. Clarke owns part of Mars. Heck thats a compliment as they don't even have anything named after them.

    Not really news as they've been in business for years, or at least someone selling moon deeds has. And not really newsworthy as its not legal. They are good for a laugh though, especially the group that claims to own the moon because thier ancestors were believed, by them, to be Lunies.

  134. Re:MS Mars, MS Moon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be impossible for the moon to crash into the earth more than once.

  135. who has rights to the moon... by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

    Obviously this is a novelty thing--not exactly news (I saw this on the Daily Show several months ago.)

    The unwritten but well known law is that whoever has the most powerful weapons/army owns the moon (assuming it's worth something to them.) Pay closer attention to history. :P

    numb

    ?syntax error

  136. Buy Tycho by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
    I think Slashdot should start a fund that we can all donate to so that we can purchase crater Tycho.

    You know, just in case they find something in it.

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    1. Re:Buy Tycho by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Hey no one is going to do that to me!

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  137. Re:What next...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More or less. At least, that's the way it worked when we screwed over the American Indians.

    Yep, that is exactly what I was thinking when I wrote that. Kinda sad that I am sure it would happen again if history were to repeat itself.
    I say that we start PETL. (Preservation of ExtraTerrestrial's Land)

    I better get a patent on the sphere idea...NOBODY LOOK AT MY POST! Nothing to see there... {Dman rushes off to the patent office...}

  138. Re:international agreement -- I hope so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I'm concerned, I think the moon belongs to me, just as much as anyone. Just like there are national parks and reserves...

    The difference being that,unlike those stoopid bird and squirrel reserves, you can own the moon for under a penny an acre (US currency, your mileage may vary.)

  139. *Drool* by Ater · · Score: 1

    Finally, my salvation arrives! I may not be able to get any earth women, but I'm sure excited of the prospect of sex with hot moon chix0rs! Hey while youre at it, maybe you can get your brothel to import some of those 3-breasted Martian women, like that chick from Total Recall! Even better, this whole moon sex idea could lead to some wil pr0n movies :)

  140. I meant trivial, not nontrivial by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

    I meant to say when travel to and colonization becomes trivial, not non-trivial. Sigh.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  141. Hell, it's less than $20!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get your plot on the Moon for like $16.

    I guess all your friends are in for a swanky piece o' property for Christmas.

  142. Re:Novelty value only by kimber1162 · · Score: 1

    If you had checked your info., you would know that the term novelty that is on the deeds, is there only to protect the Lunar Embassy from frivoulous lawsuits. As you must be aware, so many Americans are fond of lawsuits.

  143. Is the moon theirs to sell? by phil+reed · · Score: 1

    You can only sell things that you have a right to sell (by possession or by other means, such as a power of attorney from the true owner). Somehow I don't think that this bunch has the right to really 'sell' moon real estate.


    ...phil

    --

    ...phil
    "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  144. And I thought my commute was bad by TheJoelMan · · Score: 1

    Did you hear about the new restaurant on the moon? The food's great but there's no atmosphere. Just couldn't resist. -------------------------

    --

    24-hour banking!?! I don't have time for that.
    -- Steven Wright

  145. ebay by LordXarph · · Score: 3

    WTF, why do this now? People have been selling the Universe (and even the occasional Multiverse) on eBay for months...

    -Lx?

    1. Re:ebay by davidhedbor · · Score: 1

      I wonder why this is posted on a news site as well. The Lunar Embassy has been selling their properties for years. I myself got a deed about two years ago.

      People wonder why you would want to buy it. Well, isn't it rather simple? It's a fun thing. Obviously I don't expect that I will ever be able to claim my property, but since when is spending $20, or whatever the current price is, for something cool a bad thing?

  146. 2001: a Real Estate Odyssey? by mmmmbeer · · Score: 4

    This brings to mind the recent article about Arthur C. Clarke, where he mentions his asteroid. Can I buy a plot of land there? I'd love to say I own part of Arthur C. Clarke. :)

    Seriously, though, what is the point of buying this real estate? Can anyone really expect these claims to hold up if and when we do get to space? And what if we just can't live there? Oh, well, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

    Btw, does anybody really want to live on Uranus? (Sorry, couldn't help myself?)

  147. MS Mars, MS Moon... by Skratch · · Score: 3

    With the kind of cash Bill Gates has, he could buy a couple of planets... Just imagine the destruction though, MS Moon would probably crash into the earth a couple times a day....

    --

    -- My neighbors dog has a four inch clit.
    1. Re:MS Mars, MS Moon... by BWS · · Score: 1

      Exactly how do you reboot MS Moon to prevent it from Crashing into MS Earth? or will Linux Venus come and seduce all the Geeks?

      --
      -- Note: These Comments are Generated by ME! Not You! ME!
  148. Novelty value only by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5
    The Lunar Embassy states that their certificate has "novelty value only" and is not to be taken as a legal deed. Lots of people don't read the fine print.

    Bruce

  149. I'm just waiting... by planet_hoth · · Score: 1

    for a pun about buying real-estate on "Uranus."

    Any takers?

    --

  150. Re:international agreement -- I hope so! by nano-second · · Score: 1

    I certainly hope there's some such international agreement. I don't like the idea of someone buying peieces of space and defacing it. As far as I'm concerned, I think the moon belongs to me, just as much as anyone. Just like there are national parks and reserves, I think the moon (and the rest of the universe) should be an international park/reserve.

    I wonder if anyone will actually pay for this, thinking they have some right to buy it and moreover that the person they are buying it from has the right to sell it. Yuck! Capitalism at its worst.
    ---

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  151. Here's the funny part by grappler · · Score: 2

    When colonization starts happening on the moon or mars or wherever, there will be a bunch of people that bought property from somebody who want their piece of it. They're gonna be pretty bummed... :-)

    --
    grappler

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  152. We all "own" the moon - not a certain person. by WinterKnight · · Score: 1

    According to traditional laws of territory,
    once a person sets his/her foot on an unclaimed
    territory and sets a simbol of ownership, a flag
    for example, then that location is owned to that
    person. The US did it first, however they have
    given up their "ownership rights" to the
    "people of earth". Its like someone reaches a
    new land, and then claim it for an entire planet
    population and not for a certain country.
    Due to that, anyone who want to 'own' a piece
    of land from the moon will have to ask permission
    from a united body that will represent the
    planet - something that we do not have yet,
    anyway. Besides - that guy from Lunar Embassy
    is using US territory laws to claim these
    territories. If I am not mistaken, the area
    under control of the US ends somewhere above
    the atmosphere, when you dont see blue anymore.
    The moon is WAY out of their control. So its
    like buying pieces of land in Germany by using
    a goverment office in Japan. No connection what
    so ever.
    I say, that guy should get sued.

  153. Re:Slashdot Mirror! NO! Media ATTN bad 4 LiNuX/BSD by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    What are you out of your mind!!! Don't you read /.!? Do you want us looking like a bunch of opportunists? Shame on you.
    "Computers should be ... tools... (siglim 120 chars)" Like cars... to the office no more no less.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  154. Space Pirates by Nehemiah+S. · · Score: 1

    Ben Bova has a couple of great books dealing with just that. Try Privateers or the sequel Empire Builders ; both well illustrate the idea that a well-meaning treaty "is just a scrap of paper" when there is no effective deterrant to aggression. And they provide a shocking demonstration of what will happen to America if our leadership continues to handle space exploration as they are today.

    Plus both are shameless plugs for free enterprise, in space and elsewhere. Read them!

    Scudder

    --
    ... and there is no doubt, that one day he will be
    where the eye of his telescope has already been
  155. Re:the flag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect none are visible. First of all, we place flagpoles in the ground sticking straight out of the surface. Imagine sticking a toothpick in an orange. If you look right down on it, it's a small point. Now look from Earth to the Moon and notice that you're looking for something about 1-2 inches across on an object about 1/4 the size of Earth. Good luck.

    (Granted that part would be different if we visited a polar region... but we didn't.)

    Just a side comment, that the flag appears to be blowing in the wind in the various moon photos. Of course, with no atmosphere, this means that the astronauts just unfurled the flag and with only 1/6 gravity, it sort of 'sticks' temporarily. You could look for that, but in 30 years, the flag is now going to be stuck to the pole more or less.

    The easy answer is, if you're trying to find it with a telescope, look for the one that fell down. At least it's a few square feet big.

    But you're not going to find it... the best commercial spy satellites can see 1 square meter objects from Earth orbit. A far cry from where you'd need to be to see a flagpole 2 inches across.

    -Derek

  156. Re:damned slashdot effect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh My GOD! We have Slashdotted the Lunar Embassy! I hope this doesn't cause an Interplanetary Incident! CmdrTaco should get get on the hotline immediately to assure the Lunar President that we have no hostile intentions!

  157. Re:international agreement -- I hope so! by kimber1162 · · Score: 1

    Will anyone buy this? Well, so far there are over 85,000 paid customers worldwide. This is just for the Lunar property. I guess the question is, who won't buy it?

  158. Re:the flag... by MartyC · · Score: 1

    I already posted the result somewhere else so apologies if you're reading it again.

    Assuming the flags were roughly a half metre across and are now lying flat n the surface.
    Then with the moon at around 400,000 km distance the approximate angular size is 1.25x10^-9 radians.

    The angular resolution of a tescope is equal to 1.22 x W / D. W is the wavelength of the light, and D is the diameter. Assuming visible light to have a wavelength of 550nm (yellow light) then in order to see the angle above D = 1.22 x 550 x 10^-9 / 1.25x10^-9

    or

    D = 54 metres (approximately)

    That's a pretty big telescope. The largest optical telscopes currently in use are the Keck telsocpes which are each 10 m in diameter.

    Once you've buit your 54 metre telescope let me know and I'll advise you on how to elimnate atmospheric turbulence and other effects that make it even harder... ;)

    --
    -- "Sponges grow in the ocean. I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be if that didn't happen."
  159. How To Own Extraterrestial Territories... by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

    ... aka Space Conquest for Dummies...

    Of course, even if this WAS legitimate, it wouldn't matter without a government (or corporation with military forces) to back it up. Without defense, anybody could move in and set up shop. So you'ld be stuck dealing with tresspassers on you're own, and all you could do is watch through your telescope and bitch at your friends that somebody is on your property... which, if they have the resources to get up there and you don't, they damn well deserve to take it from you.

    - Maine Coon
    Meow meow meow meow, meow meow meow meow, meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow!

    --
    Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
  160. Re:international agreement -- I hope so! by douglass · · Score: 1

    >I certainly hope there's some such international >agreement. I don't like the idea of someone >buying peieces of space and defacing it. As far >as I'm concerned, I think the moon belongs to >me, just as much as anyone. Just like there ara
    >national parks and reserves, I think the moon
    >(and the rest of the universe) should be an >international park/reserve.

    You know, I ended up doing a double take when I read this. Initially this sounds like a wonderful thing to me, that all of this land should be commonly owned, free space to all.
    The reality of this though is that it's not going to work well. Eventually humans are going to start living off this planet (at least I think we can all agree on that). Once we do, do we really want every place you live beside earth to be some government owned and operated area? No, we're going to want to say this is my land and my house just as we do here. While I agree that some areas need to be defined as national park/reserve style areas, I think there also need to be areas that can be claimed for individual ownership.

  161. What next...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have not had a chance to go to the link since it is already slashdotted, but for some reason I cannot see this working. Who is selling the estate? It is not like they own it in the first place, right? I can say to you that I will sell you a spot on Mars, but if (someday) you could go to that little spot that I said you own and you find little green men living there, it is no longer thiers? Just because I said so? Here, I have bottled air for sale, and some dehydrated water. (Just add water!!!)

    Make money fast! Find rich gullable people and sell them nothing!
    I would like to sell people little glass vacuum spheres. Then you can say you own nothing, and it is something!

  162. damned slashdot effect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now youve killed the server in the moon.

  163. This is old news by double_h · · Score: 1

    Ho hum. It's been at *least* 15 years since I saw people (don't know if it's the same company) claiming to sell blocks of land on Mars ("for novelty purposes only"). They used to advertise in GAMES magazine and OMNI, and you could also buy an entry in their name-a-star database.

  164. I'm sorry... by jem · · Score: 1

    ...but I have copyright on selling lunar property - I wrote a short story in fourth grade and mailed it to myself.

    Not sure how I'm going to enforce it =)

    Obviously they have been importing too much crack from Jupiter. They should know it is too strong for humans.

  165. Uh-huh, right. by Bearpaw · · Score: 3
    (Italicized quotes are from the website.)

    Contrary to popular belief, ownership by individuals of extraterrestrial properties is not forbidden.

    Well, ok, but it does not therefore follow that anyone will take any of these claims seriously.

    The US government has several years to contest such a claim. They never did. Neither did the United Nations nor the Russian Government.

    They've never contested my claim that I'm Napolean Bonapart, either.

    Two former US President and several very prominent stars own their Lunar property already.

    Did they actually *buy* claims, or were they gag gifts?

    This is all pretty silly. If some really rich person -- let's call him D.D. Harriman -- went up and established a lunar colony, and some nut tried to take him to court because he did it on land "claimed" this way, it'd take a judge about 5 minutes to throw the case out. (Not counting the 15 minutes it'd take to stop laughing.)

    "They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." - Carl Sagan

  166. ... by [alpha]boy · · Score: 1

    Didn't that happen way back when America was founded...the settlers selling people the native american's land? Kinda funny, wait till they find out there's life on one'a the planets and people go and try to build their summer homes there and the natives get a little hostile. Ray Bradbury, here we come...

    On another note, has anybody heard the commercials where you can pay to name stars? I heard about that briefly, is this something similar?

    --


    Those who talk do not know.
    Those who know do not talk.
    Keep your mouth closed.