Slashdot Mirror


Sex in Space

Alex Farber turned us on to this story in the January 2000 issue of Scientific American about something NASA never talks about: sex in space. The article says, "Rumors of unofficial orbital couplings abound, but no one is talking." With manned (and/or womanned) Mars missions likely to take 2.5 years or more, and duty cycles on the planned International Space Station expected to be nearly six months, outer space sex is a subject even the most prudish NASA bureaucrats will not be able to avoid much longer. Face it: wouldn't you want to experiment with Zero-G lovemaking if you had a chance to do so - and you had a willing partner available whose curiosity quotient was as high as yours?

276 comments

  1. Hrm...... by BlueCalx- · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't the... you know.. love juices go all over the place?
    >;)
    Hrm, first post? :)

    --
    -- BlueCalx | http://nickd.org/
    1. Re:Hrm...... by frantzdb · · Score: 1

      To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction... hmm...

    2. Re:Hrm...... by infojack · · Score: 1

      I think rob should worry about getting laid on earth before he moves on to space.

    3. Re:Hrm...... by Deosyne · · Score: 4

      Oh, great, so we're going to see astronauts masturbating during the NASA tour in a room labeled, "Alternate Propulsion Technologies." I think I'll just stay home...

      Deosyne

    4. Re:Hrm...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you swallow you space jockey!

    5. Re:Hrm...... by perler · · Score: 1

      hihi, we even made song about this. goes like,

      "...small white pearls..."

      and

      "...mother earth turns away in shame.. "

      :)

      PAT ("c4space", germany)

    6. Re:Hrm...... by Sibelius · · Score: 1

      LOL

    7. Re:Hrm...... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      This won't fly; for one thing, it's blatantly sexist...
      -- ----------------------------------------------
      Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!

  2. Interesting story... by Doctor+Wonky · · Score: 4


    I especially like this:

    "...the few who don't like to think about sex, at least not officially."

    How do you officially think about sex?

    Doc

    1. Re:Interesting story... by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 2

      I think NASA's been right not to let sex be part of the space program. If you're going to be in close quarters with someone for six months, sex just introduces too great a risk of communication problems that could jeopardize the mission.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    2. Re:Interesting story... by quasimoto · · Score: 1
      "How do you officially think about sex?"

      1)NASA == government == sexual harasssment

      2)NASA == military personnel == 'don't ask don't tell'

      3)any thing else is for adults to figure out on their own

    3. Re:Interesting story... by ak · · Score: 1

      def. official sex :
      A $16 billion contraption built by highly qualified engineers meant to be used by consenting adult astronauts (preferably of different sex but don't ask don't tell :) ) who sign disclaimer documents before entering the device. All performance statistics are recorded for future scientific analysis.

      It is all for the good of man, science, universe, life, fish and everything.

      First giant step for Astronaut XYZ,
      A giant leap for the human kind!

      -ak

    4. Re:Interesting story... by JordanH · · Score: 1
      • A $16 billion contraption built by highly qualified engineers meant to be used by consenting adult astronauts...

      Hmmmm.... What do we call it?

      The term "O Ring" is already taken...


      -Jordan Henderson

    5. Re:Interesting story... by yetisalmon · · Score: 1

      Wow...I've never had sex before, and to have sex in space?! If they say sex in water is great, then this must be phenomenal.

      Maybe NASA has secret studies on the effects of sex in space, that we dont even know about. Hmmm....ah well.

    6. Re:Interesting story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had rather thought that it would look like something that a bungee cord bondage fetishist would enjoy, but maybe that's just me ;)

    7. Re:Interesting story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow...I've never had sex before, and to have sex in space?! If they say sex in water is great, then this must be phenomenal.
      One problem with this: Sex in water is not great. No lubrication, you see...
    8. Re:Interesting story... by godlee · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've had sex in space, and now you can too! All you need is about 3 hits of acid and a willing partner.

    9. Re:Interesting story... by Darchmare · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to go into detail on anything, but let's just say water is not the best in lubrication.

      - Jeff A. Campbell
      - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

      --

      - Jeff
    10. Re:Interesting story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It would be great to do it with a hot chick in a pool filled with extra virgin olive oil (yum).

      Better leave out the black olives though...makes it too hard to spot those spontaneous little accidents...

    11. Re:Interesting story... by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

      How do you officially think about sex?

      How does the old line go? "Put a flag over her head and do it for your country"

      To be gender neutral, wasn't there also some british peeress who said "I just close my eyes and think of england."


      --
    12. Re:Interesting story... by flink · · Score: 1

      The Orgasmotron!

    13. Re:Interesting story... by porkchicken · · Score: 1

      It's Official! I think about sex all the time!

    14. Re:Interesting story... by Alkivar · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, sounds like my friends at a rave last night ;)

    15. Re:Interesting story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think NASA's been right not to let sex be part of the space program.

      Guess I am going to cancel my application for next years space training.

    16. Re:Interesting story... by afc · · Score: 1

      The Orgasmotron!

      LOL! But you reference was totally lost on the Slashdot crowd.

      --
      Information wants to be beer, or something like that.
  3. Hmmm by Freshman · · Score: 0

    I'd settle for any sex, actually.

    --

    ----------
    "They misunderestimated me." --George W Bush, Nov. 6, 2000
    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd settle for any sex, actually.

      Of course you would. You're a freshman. But you probably won't be getting any for a while .. not after leaving Dean Wormer's daughter on the doorstep in that shopping cart, anyway.

  4. Take me! by VAXGeek · · Score: 0

    Is this a call for volunteers? Sign me up.

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
  5. Blue Danube Waltz... by emerson · · Score: 3

    I can't get the image out of my head: two would-be Zero-G lovers, rotating in space to get 'aligned' correctly like the docking scene in _2001_.


    --

    1. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by Misagon · · Score: 1
      I heard the following quote about sex a few years ago. Since then I have been wondering about the meaning. Now I understand. ;-)

      Size is not important. It is the rotation velocity that makes a difference.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    2. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a woman.. let me tell you. When we say size doesn't matter. It does. Oh it does.

      Long and thin, too far in. Short and thick, just the trick. Long and thick is best, though.

    3. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by tea43 · · Score: 2

      I also can't imagine they'd go to Mars. You'd have to think that after a few months they'd turn for Uranus, no?

    4. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

      While I worked there in Medical Operations, we did have some "flights of fancy" where folks versed in the functional and physiologic aspects of the activity speculated on various issues.

      1. In microgravity, one must be concerned with maintaining appropriate positioning. We discussed a variety of methods, but decided several (n=2 or 3) bungee cords would work, if they weren't too tight or too loose.

      2. In keeping with the concept of personal restraint for the Shuttle, it was decided (unofficially, of course) that this would be appropriate only on flights where the rigid sleep station was installed.

      3. The term "consenting adult" takes on new meaning when you realize that the entire living space of the Shuttle is about the size of a minivan. If your fellow crew members don't agree to your (and your partner's) activities, you could find yourself duct-taped into a corner. For the rest of the flight.

      4. Partaking of such activities is problemmatic because of the lack of a shower on the shuttle. Sponge baths were deemed unsatisfactory for further post-coital relaxation.

      5. For reasons associated with personal hygiene, the lack of a shower dictated such activities late in the mission, so that odor wasn't a major issue in the cabin.

      6. For reasons of personal hygiene, lack of a shower was expected to decrease the chances of this activity occurring as an unplanned event. Thecrew's well known for completing Crew Activity Plan (CAP) events, but unplanned optional events that are aesthetically unpleasant (like love-making after living together for 8 days in a minivan without a shower) have a history of being dropped. The participants would have to be committed to the experiment.

      So... don't think it's never been discussed by the technical folks at NASA... just never admitted to by the managers.

    5. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slut.

    6. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virgin. :P

    7. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably one of the "little" guys too! =P

    8. Re:Blue Danube Waltz... by MasterMnd · · Score: 1

      hmm, no showers?? I think they'll have some problems after 2 years without sex with no showers.. I'm sure on a long-term mission like that they'll find SOME way to clean up, otherwise there'll be some pretty smelly astronauts...

  6. Well... by Hadean · · Score: 1

    I like sex, personally... I'll admit that ;) but, er, wouldn't the sperm have a hard time getting to its "destination" in the zero gravity? And if it, using the internal forces of Woman, made it, it would have one helluva time fighting to get into that egg... if humans have a hard enough time "swimming" around in space, imagine a sperm? hmmm..

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you're right -- tell me why this would be a BAD thing? I mean, really, would you actually launch into space for PROCREATIVE sex? You can do that on Earth...

    2. Re:Well... by synaptik · · Score: 1


      You've obviously never been a sperm!

      :)



      --synaptik

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    3. Re:Well... by mafried · · Score: 1
      If I remember correctly from my bio class, you are effectively sterile when you are in zero g, due to the lack of the sperm's ability to swim correctly as well as the egg not being able to move through all those tubes and stuff. It's been quite a while sense I took that class, and I'm not sure if that is true, but can anyone confirm it?

      (This obviously does not apply if you have centrifugal forces creating an artificial gravity)

      -mafried

    4. Re:Well... by PixelCat · · Score: 1

      I don't think that gravity is really an issue wrt to sperm motility, or standing up for a few hours after sex would be a sure-fire method of birth control!

    5. Re:Well... by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      dude.. the little guys can swim up too. ;-)

      Maybe it is hard for them to swim in zero g, though.

    6. Re:Well... by JordanH · · Score: 1
      • You've obviously never been a sperm!

      I don't remember it, but I'm sure that I was once a sperm. Or was I an egg?


      -Jordan Henderson

    7. Re:Well... by Bill+Currie · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't be suprised if the sperm need gravity to know which way is up.

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    8. Re:Well... by rew · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be suprised if the sperm need gravity to know which way is up.

      And I wouldn't be surprised to find that sperm doesn't give a damn. Suppose there are 20 "forks" in the road, and half of the sperm gets it wrong on every fork. Then about 1 in a million would make it to the "right spot". So you're left with what is it? 100 to 1000 live sperm to fertilize one egg?

    9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      A number of experiment have been done in SpaceLab specifically to look at the potential for developmental problems. And there are some indications that embryo development is better aided in a positive-G environment (negative-G might work as well, but vice zero-/micro-G, they're the same: acceleration in a direction; thus, +G vice micro/0G).

      The physiology of motile sperm traversing the cervix and reaching the fallopian tubes for insemmination is not considered to be an issue because the sperm swim their way "up" the cervical mucous rather than engaging in a free fligth to the egg.

      As for maneuvering in micro-G, most get the hang of it pretty quickly. As I indicated in an earlier post, staying "docked" might require use of aids, but the maneuvers are not that hard to master, especially if you wait 24 hrs to make sure neither party's got space motion sickness problems, and has their "space legs."

      While I worked with a bunch of the crew while there, this is a topic that was really not discussed, even after a few beers... there were rumors, but nothing supportable, demonstrable, and certainly no willing witnesses to interview.

    10. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few hours? A day or two is more likely with the lifespan of those little suckers....

    11. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sperm would do just fine. Ciliary motion in fluid media is largely independent of the effects of gravity, as are smooth muscle contractions (hint: you can still swallow while standing on your head). At that scale, brownian motion dominates over gravity as the major obstacle.

      Gravity only becomes an issue when you reach the size of an insect or greater.

    12. Re:Well... by dweezil · · Score: 1

      Sperm don't go UP, they go IN.

  7. Sci Am on "Sex in Space" by the+red+pen · · Score: 2
    Actually, I remember grabing a copy of SciAm about 20 years ago for the specific reason that it had a cover blurb promising an article on "Sex In Space."

    Turned out to be an interesting article about fetal development in zero-G. Not what I was hoping for, though.

  8. Space Hotels by garver · · Score: 1

    In some of the space hotel ventures that I've seen, they talk about the draw being the view, and *ahem* the recreational possibilities of zero-gravity.

    To answer your question Roblimo, hell yeah I'd want to try it out!

    1. Re:Space Hotels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a company here in Honolulu that is designing a space hotel out of old orbitting space junk. So the beds might be a little hard. Although a zero-g waterbed with bungee cords might be sort of interesting.

  9. Muscle Use by StromThurmond · · Score: 1

    After living for a couple years in a space station your muscles would be in completely different shape than they were on earth. Even if you worked out regularly there would still be muscle deterioration. It would be more difficult to perform any interesting acrobatics in that condition ;).

    1. Re:Muscle Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm - - why wait 2 years before doing it in space ? Can't I start from day one? That would be the best way to keep the muscles in shape :-)

    2. Re:Muscle Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not quite a flamebait as people should not this is a serious problem and so all that "no gravitation" talk is nonsense. Some gravity, easy to be done by letting the whole thing rotate, would be a must lest to end up with a bunch of physical wrecks.

      Living without it for two years would mean those people would hardly able to stand on any planet.

      If it comes to birth in space - hardly conceivable. Not just for technical reasons. It is well known children need an environment to develop and a child born in space - would be pretty inhuman. Letting aside here that it would have no chance to develop a imune system as required to live on earth.

    3. Re:Muscle Use by geezus · · Score: 1

      its evolution baby.

  10. But Seriously... by snack · · Score: 3

    With these 2.5 year trips to Mars, If there was a child concieved, would they pack some car-seats in on the spaceship?

    1. Re:But Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they would just jettison the abortus out the hatch.

    2. Re:But Seriously... by jeremy+f · · Score: 4

      If there was a child concieved on any space station, imagine how hard it would be for her to adjust to actual gravity? A baby born in Zero-G, and spends his first few months, even years in Zero-G is going to have a hell of a time learning how to crawl, walk, and may possibly distort her sense of balance for the rest of her life. Plus, there's physiological issues here. INS, but I think we haven't done tests on creatures born in zero-g and adjusting to gravity. Would being exposed to earth-like gravity after several years of it's life developing in zero-g crush it's internal organs, much like we would be crushed if we were to visit the surface of Jupiter (if one existed...)?

      And even the child's body wasn't crushed by the adjustment to gravity, would he even be capable of learning how to walk?

      I'm opposed to animal testing, but this is something that should be researched before someone makes a mistake and loses a child unintentionally.

      (The above is purely opinion. Take it as such :-) )

    3. Re:But Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me the child conception would be the hard part. It seems our seed wouldnt be able to "swim" in 3 dimensions, and still make it where it needs to be. (i say 3d there as opposed to on earth, because on earth they have the whole up and down thing done for them by gravity, they only have to swim back and hang a left...)

    4. Re:But Seriously... by Ashen · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the techies at Nasa can figure out how to make sex possible without having a baby come out of it, don't you? ;)

    5. Re:But Seriously... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

      If there was a child concieved on any space station, imagine how hard it would be for her to adjust to actual gravity? A baby born in Zero-G, and spends his first few months, even years in Zero-G is going to have a hell of a time learning how to crawl, walk, and may possibly distort her sense of balance for the rest of her life.

      And the frequent sex changes must make things that much more confusing!

    6. Re:But Seriously... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      thats why any mission as far as mars would be in a rotating craft, producing artifical gravity, duh.
      In case your curious, it looks like they are abandoning the big wheel idea of past, and just spining the current spacecraft about its z axis (that would be the axis from tail to nose) that way you would be pushed toward whatever is the closet wall. (But you do need to big wheel to stabilize the spin,, as such a small spin would be unstable and could easily change by a persons movements, if we can accually find water on the moon, its theorized we could use a large pump (powered by sun) to inflate a large wheel that could be compacted, but, thats a big if)

    7. Re:But Seriously... by jeremy+f · · Score: 1

      And the frequent sex changes must make things that much more confusing!

      Oops. I checked through for that, & must have missed. I've gotten razzed in High School & College for using "Their" instead of "His or Her" more times than I can count ;P

    8. Re:But Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wear a rubber. Problem solved.

    9. Re:But Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heinlen's sp? 'Stranger in a strange land" possibly coming true.. cool. :)

      Imagine being the first kid born in space?? That would be cool.. I am sure he/she/it would adjust to earths gravity in time, and the kids at school would stop calling it 'gimpy alien' after a few years.. you'd be wicked famous for your whole life probably..

      What would you claim was your nationality when crossing the border?

      Could you get dual mars/earth citizenship?

      -Bastard

    10. Re:But Seriously... by MasterMnd · · Score: 1

      umm, actually it'd still be 3d on earth too.. all depends on what position your in on which way the gravity is pulling from.... I don't think that's be an issue so much.. but then ovulation on the other hand may have more to do with gravity?? oh-well

    11. Re:But Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, tests along these lines have already been done. Even in a full 1g environment, activity of the animal _in utero_ and during the first period after birth determines how well it can maneuver. For example, depriving an animal of self-exploratory movements forever disrupts their capacity for cutaneous responsiveness.

      Similarly, removing the semicircular canals (that mediate balance) makes it almost impossible for developing animals to move about.

      I would predict that a fetus developing in space would have enormous difficulties adapting to any degree of gravity.

      The issue is continuity of the environment from development of the vestibular (and muscle, skeletal) system to onset of walking, or from a few weeks after conception to roughly 1 year after birth. Derangements at any time during this period could well be irreversible.

      I would say that simple ethics demands that all "experiments" along these lines utilize contraception to the fullest extent possible.

    12. Re:But Seriously... by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      It seems to me the child conception would be the hard part. It seems our seed wouldnt be able to "swim" in 3 dimensions, and still make it where it needs to be. (i say 3d there as opposed to on earth, because on earth they have the whole up and down thing done for them by gravity, they only have to swim back and hang a left...)

      It would more likely be a chemical scent trail that the sperm would follow, than reacting to gravity. Just a thought there.

      Also, even if all them sperms went a wigglin' in all kinds of different directions, at least some are going to go in the RIGHT direction.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  11. I'd just settle for 1G sex by decipher_saint · · Score: 0
    If I could get any, that is!

    Being a blind programmer has its disadvantages too.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  12. Babies in Space? by notsosilentbob · · Score: 2

    In all seriousness, with most birth control methods being only 99% effective, the serious question of what to do if conception occurs comes up.

    Abortion in space? Imagine the religeous leaders of the world... they'll flip! Even more medically intrusive procedures such as getting a vasectomy (snip snip) aren't foolproof.

    1. Re:Babies in Space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      I'm sure the astronauts would be given Ru486 ("Day After Pill") or such to avoid this problem. That's the only ethical thing to do, scientifically, if you want to have sex in space.

      This would likely set the religious right up in arms however. But on the other hand, astronauts are (or at least were in the past) given the means to commit suicide in case things got really fubared. And suicide is, of course, also a mortal sin in most religions.

    2. Re:Babies in Space? by Zugok · · Score: 2

      The day/morning after pill is simply a higher strength oral contraceptive, and is really only effective three days after the sexual event has occured. RU486 is not the day after pill, it is a prostaglandin analogue and would more be correctly classed as an abortifacient, and thus has the advantage of being useful after the three days which the day after pill would not be effective.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    3. Re:Babies in Space? by ChadN · · Score: 1

      Thanks for correcting this (as I would have). Note that the "day after pill" works to suppress ovulation (like the normal birth control pill) and thus is NOT an abortive pill. If it fails, and conception occurs, a normal pregnancy will develop.

      RU486 is a totally different matter.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    4. Re:Babies in Space? by PD · · Score: 1

      One of the ways that birth control pills work is to suppress implantation of the fertilized egg.

      Birth control pills can still allow fertilization.

    5. Re:Babies in Space? by Zugok · · Score: 1

      Well suppressing ovulation is one way, and indeed sometimes these pills are used as regular contraceptives for a small group of women for various reasons. The other mde of actions is if fertilisation has occured, is the morning after pill (or more to be more PC, Emergency Contraceptive Pill or ECP), makes the uterius wall unsuitable for implantation. This is I guess is what puts the ECP on the fine line of an abortifacient and contraceptive

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    6. Re:Babies in Space? by minkyboodle · · Score: 1

      actualy no it doesn't normal bcp's are hormonal, they mimic the hormones that are present durning normal pregnancy, hence stoping ovulation

      --
      The angle of the Dangle is equaly proportional to the heat of the beat. ---Beavis
  13. It would be interesting to say the least by crayz · · Score: 2

    It seems to me you'd need some type of handles on the floor(or whatever, it doesn't matter in space), because how do you "push" with no gravity?

    So either the crew would have to jury-rig something up, or NASA would have to set up a "love-room" or something. Another interesting question(s): birth control? pregnancies? abortion? birth in space?

    If there's a 2.5 year trip to Mars, I don't think it would be all that unlikely for one of the women to get pregnant and potentially have to deliver in zero-g. Of course, the delivery and raising of the child pose all new dilemas(but on the bright side, there won't be any "SIDS" in space).

    1. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by Kit+Lo · · Score: 3
      So either the crew would have to jury-rig something up, or NASA would have to set up a "love-room" or something

      Hmmm... The room has to be sealed (from bodily fluids as mentioned from posts above and below), but how about the amount of life support (air) required in the room? Sex is a very intense activity to the heart (and the lungs, which would I guess need a lot of air). (Oh, great! The room has a busted CO2 filter!)

      birth in space?

      For health reasons, it's better not to have a pregnant woman in space to give birth. If the lack of gravity can weaken the adult body (weakens the bone structure and all -- the reason people worried about John Glenn in space in November 1998), what would zero gravity do to the newborn's body?
      --

    2. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      You can push and pull off of your partner. Besides, all you really need is your hips. You can't push and pull, but you can wiggle in opposite directions. That's usually what does the job on earth, too. ;-)

      If they ever made a zero-G porno, I'd watch it just for laughs. I can see their big selling point being something like "Incredible and erotic one mile c*m shot!" or something obscene about the way breasts jiggle in space.

    3. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by danielrogers · · Score: 1

      Acctually, once they were floating they could push and pull off each other all they wanted and their center of mass would stay moving at a constant velocity. Their center of mass can only move if an external force is applied. The difficult part would be getting into the middle of a room with zero net momentum (relative to the ship) between them. Possible, but difficult. Otherwise they might drift into a wall in the middle of the act.

      ---------------------------
      Attraction is Biology
      Love is chemistry
      Sex is physics.

    4. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered was the real motive behind velcrow...

    5. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      In space, everyone can see them jiggle...

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    6. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe there is a zero-g porno movie. Liam Howlett from the Prodigy and 3D from Massive Attack made the music. Obviously, they didn't shoot the film in space; they borrowed the vomit comet. It's called The Uranus Experiment.
      Here's the story at NME
      --
      "I was a fool to think I could dream as a normal man."

    7. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Gravity is irrelevant.

      OK, visualize, for a moment, your partner wrapping her (or his) legs around your waist, pulling you in. This is the missionary position and believe me, it won't jeopordize your long mission, but will make it go faster. What a great way to pass some hard time in space.

    8. Re:It would be interesting to say the least by Fruan · · Score: 1

      "Attraction is Biology
      Love is chemistry
      Sex is physics."

      And so and interesting sub-set of sex is astrophysics?

      --
      Shawn Poulsen (Fruan)

      "On Slashdot, many obvious things are insightful." - Annonymous Coward, 2000/7/9

  14. Fertilization isn't necessarily the point :) by Booker · · Score: 3

    At least not on a 2.5 year Mars mission. I think you'd want to be pretty damn sure that you didn't wind up pregnant on a 2.5 year space mission... in fact, I wonder if they'd require sterilization beforehand. I mean... nobody knows how well contraceptives would work in zero-gravity, and a pregnancy could be disastrous and/or tragic...

    Surely they've contemplated that scenario?
    ----

  15. For every action ... by Hrunting · · Score: 2

    ... there is an equal but opposite reaction.

    In any case, I'm sure the engineer's solution to this problem wouldn't be sex at all, but a 'Net downlink with some pr0n and a little device that would prevent the compartment from getting 'sticky', if you know what I mean.

    But seriously, NASA has given us so many improvements for our daily lives, I'm sure that I'll be interested in whatever they have to say about sex.

    1. Re:For every action ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      little device? do you mean a sock?

  16. Condoms required by barzok · · Score: 2
    I wonder what the...um...byproducts? of sex would do to all the switches, instruments and stuff.

    Maybe they could build a special chamber for it. Get some centrifuge action going on so you have some gravity to work with (otherwise you might have to use some rope...wait, that's not a bad idea!), build a shower system into it to clean things off when you're done...what else can we toss in there?

    1. Re:Condoms required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just "bury it deep", dude...

  17. Easily by / · · Score: 2

    You do it in your office, with other officials, as a public figure, and at tax payer expense. Numerous politicians and sitting presidents come to mind.

    Or you can just publicly and officially declare that you think about sex. Jimmy Carter's public confession that he considered himself an adulturer because he had adulterous thoughts in his heart must surely qualify.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
    1. Re:Easily by howardjp · · Score: 2

      I heard the President was standing...

  18. Will SOMEONE please stand up?! by Woody · · Score: 3

    I, in an effort to further the human race, do volunteer to be one of the "testees" (har) for this noble experiment. I will contribute just about any part of my body that you want in order to help with this interesting, er, thing that you are doing. Just don't tell my girlfriend. Going to Mars, or anywhere outside of Earth for that matter, is a pretty good deal, too. NASA, you can contact me at the above email address. I eagerly await your reply!

    1. Re:Will SOMEONE please stand up?! by JordanH · · Score: 2
      • I, in an effort to further the human race, do volunteer to be one of the "testees" (har) for this noble experiment.

      Very noble of you.

      First, there's the matter of the training course using simulated conditions.

      We fly you up to about 50,000 feet in a cargo plane and dive this "Vomit Comet" into a freefall trajectory. Uhmm, to make this realistic, we'll be asking you to make a complete, uhhm, runs in under 74 seconds, repeatedly.

      Thank you for your service to science.


      -Jordan Henderson

    2. Re:Will SOMEONE please stand up?! by Woody · · Score: 1

      No problem. I've seen the Vomit Comet, I think it looks amazingly cool, and I'd be willing to do it. I wanted to be an astronaut when I was a kid. I THINK that I'm still game!

    3. Re:Will SOMEONE please stand up?! by JordanH · · Score: 3
      And, being a typical Slashdot Geek, the 74 second "test cycle" is probably well within operational parameters...

      OK, you're in, so to speak.


      -Jordan Henderson

    4. Re:Will SOMEONE please stand up?! by Chas · · Score: 1

      And, being a typical Slashdot Geek, the 74 second "test cycle" is probably well within operational parameters...

      LOL!


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    5. Re:Will SOMEONE please stand up?! by Woody · · Score: 1

      Again, just don't tell my girlfriend... ;)

    6. Re:Will SOMEONE please stand up?! by GreenGhost · · Score: 1
      What, you're girlfriend isn't into that sort of stuff? OR, would you rather cheat on her on another planet? It looks like you should settle your fidelity issues before you even begin your, er, 'training.'

      --
      The Original Celebrated Curiously Strong GHOST (mentha lemures)
  19. this may have already happened by LocalYokel · · Score: 1

    I must continue the Slashdot tradition of saying that all of this has been done before.

    First of all, because there is frequently more interesting stuff there than here, and these guys need promotion, is that GeekNews posted this article to their website a couple of days ago.

    Second, the first married couple in space flew on the U.S. Space Shuttle a few years ago. There was talk of this back then, the official line was that it wasn't going to happen, but if you had the opportunity, would you pass it up? methinks not.

    --

    --
    E2 IN2 IE?

    1. Re:this may have already happened by Thagg · · Score: 5
      I tried to engineer some zero-g sex, but it didn't happen.

      We at Hammerhead produced the upcoming film Supernova, and there was a call in the script for a zero-g sex shot.

      Well, Novespace, a French company, has a big A300 fitted as a zero-g research vehicle. Much like the KC-135 that NASA uses, but without all of those pesky governmental interferences. We called Novespace, and they were willing to let us rent the plane and film our zero-g sequences.

      Before we got to the point of having to reveal exactly what these sequences would be, though, the deal was scotched. While the rental price was quite reasonable (less than 200K/day) the shooting would have to be done in France. Flying the minimal movie crew to France, putting them up for a week in a style to which we'd all like to become accustomed, and flying them back raised the price to something untenable. They couldn't fly the plane to the US because the FAA hadn't given them a US type certificate.

      Now, it would be hard to have sex 30 seconds at a time; and of course it wouldn't be honest to goodness sex for our movie; but it would have been fun. It would be like nothing anybody had ever seen before.

      thad

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    2. Re:this may have already happened by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 1

      Um, what kind of budget were you working on that you could afford a $200K a day plane, but airfare and hotel for a minimal crew breaks the budget? If MGM/UA thought it was worth the plane rental for the scene, I'm sure they would have found the money for hotel rooms. I don't know if bringing the plane over to the US would have been any cheaper (rental for transport time + fuel + flight crew's hotel, etc.) than sending a film crew to France. I think some producer types were just making excuses.

      Still, it would have been pretty cool to do, though, whatever the scene was. Especially if you could have been one of the crew. :-)

      --
      Ideology is for ideots.
    3. Re:this may have already happened by Coolfish · · Score: 1

      What do you mean Now, it would be hard to have sex 30 seconds at a time?

      j/kin. But i'm sure quite a few /. readers get it. :)

  20. Bond did it first! by nathanm · · Score: 2

    Remember the ending scene from Octopussy?

    Seriously though, there was a married couple on a recent space shuttle flight. You know they had to think about it.

    1. Re:Bond did it first! by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

      Aren't you talking about Moonraker?

    2. Re:Bond did it first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw married couple, un-married couples...hell i would go at it with my-self if i had to

  21. Contraceptives would work fine by / · · Score: 2

    Hush, son, before you make yourself look like you've never had sex before. Condoms don't require gravity. Neither do hormonal shots like Deproprovera. Neither does any of them.

    As for pregnancy, you take precautions, and if that doesn't work, you just pack lots of morning-after pills, and if it's too late to prevent implantation, there are other hormone regimes. Medically (chemically) induced abortion has been a reality for thousands of years. I just can't see it helping NASA funding any.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
    1. Re:Contraceptives would work fine by Booker · · Score: 2

      Hrm, perhaps... although it's possible that if um... drips don't go in the normal (down) direction, you could be in for a surprise. Or new (previously impossible) positions that make things like diaphragms not work so well. Or the weightless shape of the uterus making an IUD ineffective... I'm not completely convinced. Hormonal contraceptives would probably be ok.

      And yeah, morning-after pills would probably be helpful, but still...

      A chemically induced abortion would remain an option, and I'm sure no one would ever know about it... but I still think that would be a tragic/traumatic experience.

      So there. :)
      ----

  22. Apollo 11 circle jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember these urban legends during the time of Apollo 11. Supposedly the mission was "celebrated" with a hearty circle jerk during the return flight to earth. I really didn't believe it then. And I don't believe it now. Who really cares?

  23. Already been done. by kevlar · · Score: 2

    They've already tried this.

    A couple years ago a married couple went up in the space shuttle and attempted to conceive a child in orbit. She didn't get pregnant though... I guess all the spermies got confused...

    1. Re:Already been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, no need for birth control then! whoopy!

  24. One Word... by Pope · · Score: 2

    ...Velcro©!

    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  25. The solution to NASA's funding woes by / · · Score: 5

    Install cameras and charge pay-per-view. That would get most of America's attention. Hell, you could pay for a lot more than 2.5 years under that funding model.

    I can see the headlines now:
    "Mons Veneris Explored Near Venetian Mountain"

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
    1. Re:The solution to NASA's funding woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the above comment should be moderated up further.

      hillarious...

    2. Re:The solution to NASA's funding woes by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      Install cameras and charge pay-per-view. That would get most of America's attention. Hell, you could pay for a lot more than 2.5 years under that funding model.

      Been done. Private, the Swedish p0rn giant, produced the "Uranus Project" featuring the first sex in zero-g. They rented a plane like the famous "Vomit Comet" that Ron Howard used to shoot "Apollo 13". Personally, I'm amazed that anyone could perform in a plane climbing and diving, over and over. The wonders of Viagra.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  26. John Glenn vomited on his last trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's hard to have sex when you're throwing up.

    In any case, NASA has invested millions in dealing with bodily fluids, so it shouldn't be a problem.

    I'm also reminded of the "zero-gravity toilet" scene in 2001: A Space Odyssey. Kubrick said that was the only joke in the film.

    1. Re:John Glenn vomited on his last trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over 50% of first time flyers in microgravity have one or more episodes of space motion sickness. The use of Vistaril injections made this much more managable. Almost all are better and have no further problems after the first day...

      This leaves ample time to work things out for other activities.

  27. How many times... by Panamon777 · · Score: 1

    ...are we going to see "But seriously..." in this discussion? I've seen at least five in twenty-three comments...

    It wouldn't surprise me if astronauts have already had sex on the shuttle or in some space station. I've read female accounts describing how nice it is to be free from gravity's effects for a few weeks. Fat leaves the hips and deposits itself in the breasts, which takes care of two issues that many women worry about. Admittedly, it is less important for an astronaut to have nice breasts than, say, a Baywatch lifeguard, but there you go.

    As for sex in space in general, I think that it's an eventuality. (Can you imagine going six months - forget two years - without any kind of sexual release?) It would be wise of NASA to establish a policy, publicly or privately, before the public starts talking about it.

  28. Rent Vomit Comet Plane For Zero G Sex by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that if one wants to experience some zero G sex, just rent the Vomit Comet for an hour. The flight has periods of Zero Gs lasting upwards of 40 seconds at a time which is enough to give one a good feel as to what sex would feel like in zero Gs.

    On an aside, a porno scene I'd PAY to see:

    A nude male and nude female jump out of a plane and get it on while falling towards the ground - that would be cool to watch. I'm not sure how they'd slow themselves down...but hey, who cares if the sex is good :-)

  29. Citizen of where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Birth control methods are only so reliable, so what would happen if a child were concieved? If a child were concieved, according to current laws as far as I remember, the child would not be a US citizen would it? If conception were to occure, what exactly would happen, an inspace abortion? (Just imagine the debate over that.) If a child were born, it wouldn't grow properly on the way back, 2.5 years each way right? The first 5 years are crucial in a childs development. Returning to earth's atmosphere could be very dangerous for it. If the child was born on Mars, Earth could have its first real Martian visit.

    1. Re:Citizen of where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Besided the aformentioned reasons (US citizen parents), any (US owned, ie NASA) spacecraft is US territory, just like an aircraft carrier, embassy, etc., therefor the child would be a US citizen even if its parents were not US citizens.

  30. All the more reason to swallow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuff said

  31. A nice article... by elfbabe · · Score: 1
    Appeared in 1997 in Cecil Adams's Straight Dope column.

    Part 1

    Part 2

    Part 3

    Marissa

  32. Pregnancy in space by Imperator · · Score: 1

    A healthy pregnancy is not something to attempt in space. In addition to all the biological problems related to zero-g, you've got the poor medical conditions with which to contend. Even with a doctor, there's no real replacement for a hospital. You wouldn't want to carry all that load just so that you can have a pregnant woman in space.

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    1. Re:Pregnancy in space by LRJ · · Score: 1

      I would think the development period while in zero-G's would be the most dangerous part. People have been giving birth outside out hospitals for many thousands of years (and as far as I know animals still give birth to healthy offspring in the wild). I'm sure the sterility of space is a lot safer place to give birth than many of the places on earth where babies have been born.

      --
      LRJ
    2. Re:Pregnancy in space by JordanH · · Score: 1
      • I would think the development period while in zero-G's would be the most dangerous part.

      I wonder if gravity isn't helpful in getting the fetus in the proper position for birthing. Gravity may also provide tensions that may help to induce labor in some indirect way.

      A breech presentation might be a problem. While a normal delivery might not be a problem in zero Gs, a ceasarian or unusual delivery could be serious.

      Of course, IANAD ;-)


      -Jordan Henderson

    3. Re:Pregnancy in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and as far as I know animals still give birth to healthy offspring in the wild

      Giving birth is not dangerous or traumatic for most animals. Humans have much narrower hips relative to the size of the baby, and this is what makes things so problematic. It's also the reason humans are born much less developed than most other species. It's the price we pay for bipedalism.

    4. Re:Pregnancy in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The birth would certainly be dangerous - unless the woman was strapped to the station itself, she'd start moving in the opposite direction herself at the last moment of birth, or at least that's what Newton would have us beleive... :-)

    5. Re:Pregnancy in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually the fetus develops in its own 'swimming pool' in the womb, so quite similar to zero G condition. Labour would also be quite easier! Obviously, something could always go wrong, but if experience of giving birth in water is something to go by, things don't look so dire. But, also, then the baby would need to go back to normal gravity for normal body development.

    6. Re:Pregnancy in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a vision of the baby popping out. Ready, aim, fire! Its a superboy! He was born to fly! Yippiee!

    7. Re:Pregnancy in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I in read a book a few years back that the zygote, while having all the same cell types at first, develops a top and bottom, based on gravity. So the chances of getting a real baby in microgravity don't look too promising.

  33. NEWS: NASA Announces New Strategy by cje · · Score: 5

    NASA ANNOUNCES NEW STRATEGIC VISION
    First Porno Made In Space Will Fetch "Billions", Says Administrator Goldin


    GREENBELT, MD (UPI) - After suffering several embarassing setbacks, including the loss of the Mars Polar Lander, Climate Orbiter, and XR-2300 Space Modulator, NASA has announced that it has decided to undertake a major shift in its funding paradigm and accept large donations from the private sector. This paradigm shift comes on the heels of sweeping condemnation from several key members of Congress, who have vowed to eliminate the agency from the federal government.

    With comments from the readership of Hustler magazine guiding him, NASA adminstrator Dan Goldin laid out a plan to shoot the first space-based pornographic movie. "We are confident," explained Goldin, "that space pornos can provide NASA with the funding that we need to explore the solar system and the rest of the Universe." Goldin continued: "It will make billions!"

    And perhaps Goldin is right. The American Taxpayer's Union, a Congressional watchdog organization, conducted a study on the effect of having American pornography revenue pumped directly into NASA. "Our figures indicate," explained group spokesman Terry Schmidt, "that if NASA were to go ahead with this plan, we could build a colony on Mars the size of Cleveland by the year 2002."

    Goldin's comments were made at the Press Briefing Room of the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. His sentiments are also shared by U.S. president William Jefferson Clinton, who addressed the issue in his annual State of the Union speech before Congress.

    "I believe that we as a nation should commit ourselves to achieving the following goals," said Clinton. "First; I believe it should be the goal of this nation to film a porno in space before this decade is out, and return it safely to Earth." Clinton's comments were briefly drowned out by applause. "We choose to film the first orgy in space!" vowed Clinton. "We choose to film the first orgy in space .. not because it is limp, but because it is hard!"

    NASA insiders confirmed that adult film stars Ron Jeremy and Christi Canyon have been signed to a three-film deal with the space agency. The first film, tentatively entitled "Hot And Heavy Weightless Love", will be shot aboard the Space Shuttle Endeavour in the fall of the year 2000.

    "The agency that brought you microwave ovens and Tang is also going to be the agency that brings you the world's first zero-gee cumshot," beamed an ecstatic Goldin. "What a great time to be alive!"

    Larry Flynt contributed to this story.

    This story contained material unsuitable for children and should not have been read by any individuals under the age of 18.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    1. Re:NEWS: NASA Announces New Strategy by Morel · · Score: 1

      Whoa...hold on a second. Did I or did I not read about some bizarre plan to shoot a porn video on Mir? Anyone hear about this? Did I have an especially dense acid flashback?

      Morel

    2. Re:NEWS: NASA Announces New Strategy by ThePlague · · Score: 1

      Gives a whole new meaning to "Faster, Cheaper, Better".

  34. potential problems by Ater · · Score: 2

    1. You'd expend all your energy just getting out of those heavy spacesuits.

    2. It would be difficult to get ol' Mr. Winky in with everything all floating around and stuff...

    3. Avoiding getting hit by floating debris while in the act... "Ohhh Yesssssss... OUCH!!!!! THAT $%$#%%$# CHAIR HIT MY ASS!"

    4. Cleanup... EWWWWWW

    5. Maintaining the position in the 0 G environment, especially tricky if you're doing it doggy style or trying kama sutra positions

    6. Contraceptives (Introducing the Trojan Glow-In-The-Dark Anti-Gravity Condom... in Cherry and Chocolate flavors!)

    7. What would you do if you were abducted by aliens while getting it on? Even worse, what if they wanted to join in?? I wouldn't mind if Martian chicks were hot, but if they weigh 600 pounds and have slimy acidic tentacles... *shudder*

    But hey, it's probably already happened on many NASA missions already. After all floating in a small confined environment in the middle of a space gets boring and lonely, and since NASA is allowing female astronauts now... *uNF* *uNF*

  35. Not exactly specific to space by / · · Score: 2

    Face it: wouldn't you want to experiment with Zero-G lovemaking if you had a chance to do so - and you had a willing partner available whose curiosity quotient was as high as yours?

    Let's face it; that pretty much sums up all heterosexual male fantasies in this culture. Replace "Zero-G" with any other contrived situation, and you have a winner. "Wouldn't it be neat if she let me put it there...." "Wouldn't it be neat if she let us do it with that one too...." "If only I could find a partner who wants to have sex as much as I do!"

    But I suppose I shouldn't expect people not to try to combine their primal drives like exploration and sex. And it is just a bit weird how America has made the great technological and cultural leap of putting convents into space, although that probably owes more to military culture than to science.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  36. How will nasa train... by jburroug · · Score: 1

    the astronauts for this? ;->
    I mean really, think about, NASA doesn't let anything happen in space that hasn't been simulated hundreds of times on Earth in their training facilities. Are they going to rig up some sort of harness and pulley system to simulate 0-G here on Earth? And if they do will I be able to buy one? ;->

    --
    "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
  37. The end of 'Moonraker' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The end of 'Moonraker' featured James Bond and Jaws getting busy with there respective partners, I just wish i could find one like jaws had, mmmm pigtails, but anyways. This led to one of the best lines in a Bond flick ever. They turn on the camera's for the space station, and M, Q, and a host of other brittish officals are watching, one of them asks "What is Bond doing". Q's responce "I believe he is attempting re-entry." A bit commical, but still on topic Duck`

  38. You have trouble with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just no jizzing on the stomach! Like the other guy said, bury it deep and make sure you shoot it deep inside her. :-) Then she can slip her knickers on and hold her legs together for a few hours.

  39. Sex in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add some space prostiutes and you have a FOX made for tv movie.

  40. Sexual restraints in space by Deosyne · · Score: 2

    I saw a show a couple years ago that touched on this subject and they even had some examples of devices that would make sex, well, possible in zero gee. One was basically made of two belts that each partner wore that were connected together with an elastic strap that would go between each side of them. I'd imagine that you'd have to keep the straps close and tight since Newton's third could end the session right quick if a strap were to come undone. :)

    Deosyne

  41. Heath-Robinson would have a field day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post is fabulously funny for what it may imply. Immagine! Two bungie ropes tied to opposite sides of the cabin and arround each participant - what on earth would be push becomes PULL! The prospect of what might happen if either participant 'let go' is to painful to contemplate but it might give a whole new meaning to 'the withdrawal method'.

  42. Read your Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your mother or father is a US citizen, no matter where you are born, you are also a US citizen by default. If your parents are NOT US citizens and you are born in the US, you ARE a US citizen.

  43. Skydiving formations, orgies, & Buckminster Fuller by Myself · · Score: 2

    Obviously 69 gets a lot easier in zero-G. Same goes for anything that was formerly constrained to 2 dimensions. Circlejerks, for example, could go spherical.

    I want to officially coin the term "Buckyfuck" to refer to a 60-person orgy. It would require a large chamber, but I'm sure a civilian space hotel might include such a facility.

    And for normal sex in space: Don't worry about getting the controls sticky, just cover the panel with a tarp! Lots of velcro, some bungees, handles and toe-holds, maybe a motorized turntable... I'd pay to see the video too. SAREX would get a lot more interesting if we could hear some moaning every now and then.

    The hilarious part comes when they have to document their findings in scientific form.

  44. "Home on Lagrange" by B. Higgins and B. Gehm by Guppy · · Score: 5

    Oh, give me a locus where the gravitons focus, Where the three-body problem is solved...

    Where the microwaves play down at three degrees K, and the cold virus never evolved.

    Home, home on Lagrange, where the space debris always collects; we've achieved, so it seems, two of man's greatest dreams...

    Solar power and zero-G sex.

    1. Re:"Home on Lagrange" by B. Higgins and B. Gehm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't know this, fulltext is available on your local computer (running fortune) 'fortune -m"LaGrange"

      It *is* funny. Laugh.

      --
      (Hope I don't get sued by /. for shamelessly stealing their tag. :-) )

  45. Nah by / · · Score: 2

    IUDs are already grossly ineffective and dangerous, so they really shouldn't be up for consideration. The idea of the uterus changing shape and rendering them less effective, however, is absurd.

    Diaphrams aren't held in place by gravitational forces; they're held in place by normal forces produced by the surrounding muscles.

    If anything, gravity opposes the flow of semen on earth -- the motion is really completely dominated by muscle contractions and osmosis, which would be equally strong in space.

    As for whether medical abortion is tragic/traumatic, that depends on either your physical constitution or your political/moral views, both of which are largely unaffected by space travel, at least in ways relevant to this discussion. And in any event, military matters have a tendancy to steamroll over any such complaints. Surely it's a lot more traumatic to swallow a cyanide pill than to swallow a mifepristone pill.

    And no you weren't being serious, but it's more fun for me if I pretend you were. ;)

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  46. Possible space pr0n titles by Ater · · Score: 1

    To advance this initiative, I have decided to help by suggesting some good titles for the eventual space pr0n genre of films. Maybe for publicity NASA could use real astronauts in their films, like have Sally Ride and Jenna Jameson in some lesbo action.


    2001: A Sex Odyssey
    Alien Anal Assault
    Apollo 69
    ASStronauts
    Ass: The Final Frontier
    Close Encounters Of The 69th Kind
    Cosmic Cumsluts X
    E.T. Gets Nasty
    Extraterrestrial Ejaculation
    Intergalatic Intercourse III
    Jizz On Jupiter
    John Glenn: Uncut (note: UGH)
    Lunar Lesbos
    Oral In Orbit
    Ream My Rockets!
    Space Shuttle Sluts: The Oral Endeavour
    SputDick
    Star Whores
    The Martian Masturbators

    Dear God I have too much free time...

    1. Re:Possible space pr0n titles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another title: in orbit, you're always going down

    2. Re:Possible space pr0n titles by sinnergy · · Score: 2

      Forget 2001: A Sex Odyssey because something like it ALREADY EXISTS!

      Do a search on IMDB for "2069: A Sex Odyssey"

      :)

    3. Re:Possible space pr0n titles by Q*bert · · Score: 2
      "In space, no one can hear you come."

      credits to my friend JES for that one...

      Vovida, OS VoIP
      Beer recipe: free! #Source
      Cold pints: $2 #Product

  47. But, seriously. by EdlinUser · · Score: 2

    NASA has said they plan to have a woman on the first manned Mars mission. Just in case someone has to ask for directions.

  48. Reminds me of... by ktakki · · Score: 1

    ... Gibson's short story "Red Star, Winter Orbit" in Burning Chrome.

    But I also wonder how a gerbil in Richard Gere's ass would deal with zero-gee.


    k., just another karma gerbil

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  49. But seriously .. by cje · · Score: 1

    .. when you're talking about long-duration space flights (rotations aboard the International Space Station, trips to Mars, etc.) it would be silly to avoid the issue of sex altogether. I mean, let's be honest .. we are human beings, after all, and a period of six months or so is an awfully long dry spell. :-)

    If NASA hasn't specifically addressed and planned for space sex, then you have to hope that at least they've stocked plenty of Kleenex on-board. ;-) Cleanliness is a virtue, after all.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    1. Re:But seriously .. by acb · · Score: 1

      when you're talking about long-duration space flights (rotations aboard the International Space Station, trips to Mars, etc.) it would be silly to avoid the issue of sex altogether. I mean, let's be honest .. we are human beings, after all, and a period of six months or so is an awfully long dry spell. :-)

      For some reason, reading this statement on Slashdot seems incongruously amusing...

      In seriousness, a "celibacy drug" may be a better solution; a drug which suppresses the sexual drive, removing all desire for sex, physical intimacy or what have you.

      The question is how this may be accomplished without nasty side-effects. Apparently both heroin and lithium are excellent libido suppressants, though both of these also adversely affect the user in many ways.

  50. The Good and the Bad. by Cromulent · · Score: 1

    Advantage: You could sell the porno for a shit load of money.
    Disadvantage: When was the last time you saw a good looking woman go on a space shuttle?

    --
    drug law enforcement is modern day witch hunting.
    1. Re:The Good and the Bad. by Chas · · Score: 1

      You forget. Being in the military tends to strengthen a man's stomach. Also, a 2.5 year enforced abstinance regimen will do strange things to a mans thoughts. Like beer-goggling....only without the beer.


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  51. dude .. by cje · · Score: 1

    Stop it, you're killing me! :-)

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  52. Re:Skydiving sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been done -- in the early 80's, and probably since. Then, it was a tandem jump with a specially-rigged backward passenger harness. Exit was "hooked up," if you catch my drift (it almost has to be -- think of the predictible effect of cold air on the male... or don't think of it. It's not pretty...).

  53. Interesting Chalenges. by FireMage · · Score: 1
    After watching Klingon blood float through Star Trek movies, and hearing about the problems going to the bathroom or even sleeping up there, I bet you'd end up with some intesting chalenges. I wonder if it would require some sort of rubber band harness to keep you from floating away from each other. I'd hate to be in the heat of it, and get going a bit to fast and suddenly you each end up flying to opposite ends of the room...

    For those on a budget, I recomend practicing underwater, just like NASA does (although, they probably practice different things.) I wonder if you could create a shallow water device where you breath through your nose, in order to keep the mouth free? Anyone know?

    And yes, they do have lubricants designed just for that.

    Reed

    --
    "Laugh hard, it's a long way to the bank." --TMBG
  54. I like some of that! by daemonchild · · Score: 1

    But only with other men, becuase I love gay space sex.

    --
    -- Went home. Had to feed the kids.
  55. Three Dolphins by YAAC · · Score: 1

    According to G Harry Stine's book "Halfway to Anywhere," getting it on properly in space requires a third person to keep the main event from flying apart. This is derived from how dolphins do it. Therefore, the club for those who have done the deed in zero-g is the three-dolphin club. Apparently there is even a patch (helpfully reproduced in the book), and there are allegedly quite a few astronauts qualified to wear it.

    1. Re:Three Dolphins by Spazmoid · · Score: 2

      But a third person is much more fun than a bungee cord!

  56. Didn't Heilien touch on this? by FireMage · · Score: 1
    I remember that in "Stranger in a Strange Land" Heinlien's Mars mission required married couples for stabilities' sake. But I don't remember if he asserted that Valentine Micheal Smith was conceived on the way, or on Mars itself.

    The how many mile high club would that be?

    --
    "Laugh hard, it's a long way to the bank." --TMBG
  57. Hemos and CmdrTaco to be first space sex couple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    according to NASA new reports

  58. Hello - like it hasn't already happened by maggard · · Score: 1
    Not to confuse all of the hetero's but what exactly do you expect was happening with week-long all-male closely-bonded high-tension crews? If there hasn't been at least a bit of "lend your buddy a hand" going on I'd be amazed.

    -- MM

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Hello - like it hasn't already happened by mattd · · Score: 1

      What a thought. I am sure it has been done. Imagine ejaculating in zero G. Without gravity it would shoot straight out.

  59. I guarantee this has been done... by aiken_d · · Score: 2

    ...nevermind all the comments about the married couple and the various women who've been on the shuttle.

    Most astronauts come from the military. And the gay population in the military is far higher than in the general population.

    I'd be very surprised if the first sex in space had been heterosexual :)

    --
    If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
  60. Supposedly NASA document 14-307-1792 has findings by ry4an · · Score: 2

    Supposedly NASA Document 14-307-1792 has documents from a shuttle mission where tests were made. It's probably a hoax, but if it is the person had beuracrat speak down pat.
    --

  61. Cecil Adams has covered this by Mr2001 · · Score: 5
    See part one, part two, and part three of his answer to the question "Has anyone ever had sex in space?"

    Cecil Adams is, of course, the world's smartest human and the author of the weelky column The Straight Dope.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  62. Re:YAFSISS by quadong · · Score: 0

    Oh, fuck sex. And stop with the "regards," with sigs disabled, it looks horrible. I feel justified saying this after your recent sig rant. [oh where oh where has my hyperlink gone, oh where oh where can she be?]

  63. 2001 is taken by Lx · · Score: 2

    Seriously, there's already a movie by the title "2001: A Sex Odyssey". Sorry. And don't ask.

    :)

    1. Re:2001 is taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It was 2069: A Sex Odyssey...

      Saw it when I was about 11.. laughed my ass off.

    2. Re:2001 is taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't I see a rating for that one on www.ohthehumanity.com? :-)

  64. But "Zero-Glovemaking" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would put all the glove manufacturers out of business... And He only knows, we really do need our gloves!

  65. Carseats? by Digital_Fiend · · Score: 1

    What with all this talk about children being conceived.. eh.. what about giving the austronauts condoms? Just a thought.

    -Warren

  66. University experiments by the_tsi · · Score: 2
    So NASA is launching a study of behavioral issues in space in conjunction with the National Space Biomedical Research Institute, a consortium of national universities and labs.

    If we sign up for this project, do we make more than the $5 the psychology department is offering?

    -Chris

  67. Ovulation and Menstruation by Detritus · · Score: 2

    Is there any data on the effects of weightlessness on ovulation and menstruation? Is gravity needed for the movement of the egg and the discharge of the lining of the uterus?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  68. Re:Supposedly NASA document 14-307-1792 has findin by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    Aw hell, I've seen a NASA document relating what to do in case of an attack by Vikings. People at NASA, and the aerospace companies have pretty good senses of humor.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  69. Kama Sutra by defaultXIX · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if this is covered in the Kama Sutra? maybe it needs a re-write......

  70. Official NASA report posted! ...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is an interesting site to read, for anyone interested in the true technical end of lovemaking in space:

    http://www.idiom.com/~brett/humor/ sex.space.html

    It purports to be an actual NASA study performed above one of the space shuttles during one of their nearly 100 flights. It's an interesting and well-written read, even if it is a hoax.

    ---

    I'm not a real anonymous coward, I just play one on TV.

  71. sex in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd like sex on earth first...

  72. A child of a US citizen is a US citizen. by jcr · · Score: 1

    As far as the USA is concerned, if you're born in the USA, or if you're born outside the USA but either of your parents is American, you're American.

    -jcr

    (Born American, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  73. Nonsense! by jcr · · Score: 1


    All it takes is a bungie cord. Think about it.

    (Incidentally, most astronauts are Engineers. I'm sure this would have been thought up by now, but I still might apply for a patent on it.)

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  74. Woo-Hoo by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

    That's like the 1,000-Mile-High club or something...

    Anyway, what about people renting NASA's "vomit comet" for experimentation? It's that plane they can take to the upper atmosphere and then gently nose down, providing the effect of zero-G for five minutes. Or was it fifteen? That'd be even better. I bet it's much cheaper than a shuttle ride, and suitable for a "quickie" if you did it right.

    And it is available for public use, they rented it to film the space scenes in the movie Apollo 13. All I can say is, that would be heck of a good time on your honeymoon.

    Which brings up the subject of pornos, as mentioned in an earlier thread. Some of the bigger studios might be able to afford it for their filmmaking projects...

    -Smitty

    --
    ± 29 dB
    1. Re:Woo-Hoo by HeghmoH · · Score: 2

      Actually, twenty to thirty is the duration you're looking for on the Vomit Comet. The problem is that the unit is in seconds, not minutes.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  75. Metal underpants by morbid · · Score: 1

    Well, perhaps they'll let me fly to Mars. I have demonstrated that I can go for long periods (years) without doing it.
    They'd have to issue me with stainless steel underpants like in Naked Gun 33 1/3 to discourage those of inferior self-control.
    Oh yes, and a stack of jazz mags....

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  76. A mission tape dialog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frank: "Bob, is that your cum floating by?" Bob: "Heheheh" Frank: "That's fucking sick, Bob. Clean it up." Linda: "Let me." *slurp* Frank: "I don't wanna be an astronaut anymore."

  77. A mission tape dialog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Frank: "Bob, is that your cum floating by?"

    Bob: "Heheheh"

    Frank: "That's fucking sick, Bob. Clean it up."

    Linda: "Let me." *slurp*

    Frank: "I don't wanna be an astronaut anymore."

  78. No, dude, that was Moonraker. *nt* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *nt*

  79. Another solution ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could recruit people from the old Apollo crews - they are now in their 70s and 80s, so they can handle celibacy :-)

  80. It has already been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    http://www.pornostars.com.ar/star/uranusenter.ht m

    The first adult move with a zero-g scene was the Uranus experiment:

    http://www.pornostars.com.ar/star/uranusenter.ht m

    (No explicit graphics or anything at that url but it should still be considered adults only).

  81. Questions for NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In sexual encounter in space, where there is no gravity, and thus no defined sense of up and down as we humans know it, who will be considered to be on top? Will space suits be built with airlocks in the pants? Given that space food comes in little toothpaste tubes, and given that contraceptive jelly comes little toothpaste tubes, how do we prevent mix-ups that cause astronauts to have repasts of nonoxenol 9 and practice family planning with beef wellington?

  82. New patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To keep the couple in place, it is more convenient to have something tie them together. A zero-G love-making spring should be in place to keep the hands free for something more meaningful.

    I'll patent this spring early next monday morning.

  83. Underwater simulation data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would underwater simulations be useful? Hmm, I should perform some experiments. Maybe I could get a National Science Foundation grant and buy a big hottub. And some wimmenz. And champaigne. Isn't science wonderful?

  84. Shot heard around the world ! by joeler · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe it won't be heard around the world
    but if they are in a weightless state the shot
    could float around the world or even several worlds.
    Of course there is also the possiblilty the shot would
    collide with something yet unknown to man and
    create a totally new life form...

    please don't take this seriously, we don't want to start a panic :)

    --
    >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
  85. Sour Grapes by Skevin · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I have so much trouble getting any tail here on earth, so why shouldn't I make my best efforts to deny sex to all astronauts (if I were working for NASA)?
    No one is getting laid on my shift.


    Solomon Kevin Chang
    Database Design and Programming
    Disney Televentures

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    1. Re:Sour Grapes by Darchmare · · Score: 1

      Morale?

      - Jeff A. Campbell
      - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

      --

      - Jeff
  86. There have been animal tests.. by reptilian · · Score: 1
    ..on rats, or mice, I believe. The hypothesis was that gravity plays an important role in the development of a mammalian fetus while it's still in the womb, and I believe that was proven. The mice, or rats, I can't remember which, were born deformed and mostly unfeasibile.

    So unless you want to take that extra risk, It's just not gonna happen. Granted, mice and rats aren't humans, but the prevailing attitude is that gravity really is an important part in fetal development.

    Man's unique agony as a species consists in his perpetual conflict between the desire to stand out and the need to blend in.

    --

    72656B636148206C72655020726568746F6E41207473754A

    1. Re:There have been animal tests.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

      Several Spacelab missions have looked at various aspects of this. Rats were used in at least 2 experiments I am aware of (I've been gone from there a long time) and fish and frogs were also looked at. Chickens were also used.

      The chicks that were early in development (last fertilized before launch) were the most severely affected. The implication is, early fetal development is potentially a +G phenomenon.

      The rats were similarly affected, but not to the extent of the chicks.

      The fish and amphibs were less affected, but with a slightly increased rate of mutation (extra limbs, etc.) that was never associated statistically with the experimental conditions. The investigators had no reasons to expect that sort of response attributable to development in micro-G.

      This is an area where a lot of physiology must be divined, and a lot of experimental work must go on. One reason that HAS to happen is, it's gonna happen and NASA's gonna have to be prepared for the results.

      I expect there remains a lot of interest in the Space Physiology arm of NASA for working on these issues at the applied and basic sciences levels.

    2. Re:There have been animal tests.. by AndyL · · Score: 1

      How do they know they weren't damaged during launch?

  87. But now for the obvious question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would it reach the Guinness book of records as "longest distance ejaculation"? 20000 km, cool. Nice gun you have there. Erm.

  88. What I wanna know is by SweenyTod · · Score: 1

    when you drifting in space between Mars and Earth, who goes to get the orange juice afterwards?

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
  89. Re:Fertility in micro-G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's still a lot of physiology to determine in microgravity, but nothing I saw from our program, or the Russians' indicates a decrease in fertilty due to a lack of gravity. There were some disturbing embryonic development issues in chickens and rats.

  90. Best pick-up lines in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey baby, want a Space Food Stick to go with your Tang?

  91. Tereshkova had sex in space many years ago by danila · · Score: 1

    Well, NASA isn't in a hurry, because this too was already done by Soviets. :) We had our Sputnik launched first, we had Gagarin in the space first, we had the Lunohod on the Moon first and many many more. (Except for man on the Moon, but financially the man-on-the-Moon campaign was a disaster for the US)

    And Valentina Tereshkova was ordered to have some sex in the space, althougth the whole story wasn't much advertised because of Soviet secrecy and moral standards.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  92. SQUIDs and Sex Packets by acb · · Score: 1

    They just need to invent direct-neural-interface virtual-reality sex. Put on some headgear or pop a pill and you're getting righteously laid, with no chance of anyone getting pregnant or catching a disease.

    Come to think of it, there could be a market for this kind of thing on Earth.

  93. ROFL! by wildbill2 · · Score: 1

    It *does* make a perverted sort of sense, after all. :-)

  94. Chemical abortion in space? by acb · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the Republicans cut NASA founding drastically if they found out that their space programme includes provisions for abortion of any sort?

    1. Re:Chemical abortion in space? by Zurk · · Score: 1

      arent they doing that anyway ?

    2. Re:Chemical abortion in space? by Uart · · Score: 1

      ever heard any of those stories about NASA's "suicide" pills... Christian Fundamentalists (who are numerous in the Repblican party, but aren't the whole party) probably disagree with that too... but seriously, there has got to be a better way, how many abourtions would they have to have on this mission? Seriously, just send women who are for some reason unable to become pregnant. be it a birth defect or surgury they had, doesn't matter. Then as long as noone has any STDs....

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  95. this doesn't sound good....... by browser_war_pow · · Score: 1

    damn.... sex in space could get really messy, really quickly.

  96. I surly know a person that would like to test it! by Harmagedon · · Score: 1

    Well, when i red this story my thaughts went over the the president of the united states, Bill Clinton, wouldent he just love to have sex with Monica again, but this time up in space. :)

  97. Too Much Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've long since been a bit of a mild perv in my thirty nine years. Among the literally thousands of places/situations, I've experienced underwater sex. It's rather difficult and quite tiring. Without friction to allow "digging in" to do the good work, that good work cannot be done. While I've experimented w/ tethering, it isn't my preferred, but it would be absolutely required in freefall.

  98. Newton's Laws of Motion can be Fun by MaggieL · · Score: 1
    "Most interesting microgravity sex scene in fiction I've read" award goes to the opening scene in John Varely's "Titan". The fundanetal rule, introduced to make it interesting: "No hands". Think about it. :-)

    Of course, the fact that it's insestuous lesbian sex between identical twin sisters spices it up, too.

    Varley does go for your attention at the opening of a story...the opening sentence of "Steel Beach" comes to mind, ferinstance.

    --
    -=Maggie Leber=-
    1. Re:Newton's Laws of Motion can be Fun by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

      It's been a long time, but I don't remember identical twins - lesbian or otherwise - in Titan. There was the captain, Cirocco Jones, and her first mate, (name escapes me. Maggie? something like that).

      I remember giving the trilogy to my baby sister as an example of strong women in sci-fi.


      --
    2. Re:Newton's Laws of Motion can be Fun by MaggieL · · Score: 1

      They were crew members of Rocky's ship. And as I recall one of them died early on.

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    3. Re:Newton's Laws of Motion can be Fun by MaggieL · · Score: 1

      I hauled out a copy ot "Titan". The characters I was thinking of were August and April, the Polo sisters. The "no-hands" rule for zero-gee sex was on the same page as a veiled allusion to the Polo sister's relationship, but actually referred to lovemaking that Cirocco was doing wth Gene, (another crewmember of DSV Ringmaster), not the Polo sisters--whatever they were doing took place behind closed doors. There was also some discussion of ejaculation as a means of propulsion. :-)

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
  99. Association of Autonomous Astronauts got there 1st by fingal · · Score: 1
    http://www.uncarved.demon.co.uk/AAA/se x.html for general purpose insanity and instability, this is the focal point of cutting edge research...

    http://www.factsheet5.com/Bypass
    "Escape From Gravity Bulletin of the Association of Autonomous Astronauts #1. The AAA launches it's five year plan for establishing global community-based AAA groups dedicated to building their own space ships. 'Space Travel is Necessary - Evolution Implies It', Sex in Space, techno-speedcore space-disco, the Luther Blissett 3-Sided Football League. "Only those that attempt the impossible will achieve the absurd." Plus free balloon. 2 sides A4, 4 1st class stamps for the next 4#s from Inner City AAA, BM Jed, London WC1N 3XX."

    Many thanks to fantomas for the URL (he's forgotten his password (again), just come back from another space mission and currently can't log in....

    --

    The only Good System is a Sound System

  100. Sex in space? No Way! by Palisade · · Score: 1

    If you're going to do that, you'd better wear a lot of protection (thick rubber glove instead of a condom) and the chick had better take ten birth control pills. Zero gravity causes massive mutations in human children concieved in space. Gravity defines our body structure when we are in the first stages of being born.

    --
    "God prevent we should ever be twenty years without a revolution." -- Thomas Jefferson
  101. Re:YAFSISS by gleam · · Score: 0

    hah! how did you get moderated up?

    sheesh. that's just wrong :)

    stop replying to my posts! karma whore!

    you made me lose a karma point and you got one :(

    maybe I'm a karma whore?

    regards,regards,regards,regards,regards,regards, regards,regards,regards,regards,regards,re gards,regards,

    so nyah.

    -ed

    --
    this .sig is not a .sig.
  102. 2.5 years without sex... by alessio · · Score: 1

    ...so, what's new?! :-/

    --
    "It is more complicated than you think" (The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925)
    1. Re:2.5 years without sex... by morbid · · Score: 1

      Here here!
      I passed my 32-month aniversary this month.
      I reckon I'd be a prime candidate for a trip to Mars.

      ;-)

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  103. Of course there has been sex in space... by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 1

    Of course there has been sex in space. Wasn't there that one time with Troi and Worf?

  104. Ground Control to Major Tom by BMIComp · · Score: 1

    Its the light-year high club!

  105. geeks in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this slashdot geeks in space or sex in space?? i think there's a typo... havent anyone of you realise this?? i'm very very confused,..

  106. Duct Tape by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
    ...you could find yourself duct-taped into a corner. For the rest of the flight.
    Of course, if you're actually into that sort of thing... ;-p

    Zontar The Mindless,

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  107. Possibilities by Dr.+Worm · · Score: 1

    IIRC, in the Larry Niven et al book Fallen Angels, I think someone had mentioned using velcro... (or, rather, not needing to use velcro if having sex in a gravitational field)

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  108. And look where it left you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    An economically destroyed, divided, pitiful country. And look where the US is. Hmm, guess it wasn't such a disaster for the US after all eh?

    1. Re:And look where it left you by umbra · · Score: 1

      Quite right. It may be off topic, but I think that scoring this as flame bait is wrong. Slashdot's IMU must be malfunctioning. The Apollo program was not a financial disaster for the US. Clearly our Russian freind's statement demonstrates very little knowlege about life in the States. And considering that the Soviet Union collapsed due to the economic mismanagement of Socialism and central planning, a Russian lecturing others on economics is more than comical. When you consider that Russia is broke, it's pretty sad. BTW: When is RSA going to start paying for their part of the ISS ? We are still picking up the tab for them. $140 million for Zarya, $160 million for the Service Module, and pretty soon were talking about real money here ;)

      --
      "It's all about access agent Spender." --The Smoking Man
  109. 3 1/2 years med school + BSc Anatomy (cum laude) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    In microgravity, sperm motility *increases* and the passive movement of the egg is based upon smooth muscle contractions of the Fallopian tubes and uterine wall. Statistically, there might be a slightly greater risk of ectopic pregnancy (outside the uterus - say the Fallopian tubes) which can still kill you due to internal hemorraging, but the major concern is the radiation hazard on the developing cell mass.

    Any pregnancy in space had better allow for very good radiation protection and some pretty serious diapers since (particularly male) infants can be pretty effective waste product distributors in three dimensions. As well, I wouldn't want to expose babies to high acceleration for the same reason that Shaken Baby Syndrome is potentially lethal here on Earth even with constant gravity.

    Low acceleration, low radiation and good hygene should allow for good pediatric outcomes as long as development itself isn't affected by microgravity. I'd much prefer babies in non-accelerating radiation protected non-microgravity environments for now, at least until microgravity development is better understood. Moon and Martian colonies would be OK, as would any space station that provides the equivalent of at least 1/6th gravity through rotation.

  110. Makes a good case for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bondage

  111. NASA on what to do in case of Viking attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, please, please post a link to this document as some guys just got off a longboat next to my village and*6$##!@+=)> TRANSMISSION INTERRUPTED AT SOURCE

  112. SPACE, NITROZAC, YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't mind traveling through space with Nitrozac. Wouldn't mind spending time under the ocean with Nitrozac either.

  113. Russians have been doing it for a while... by Axiom · · Score: 1

    Americans may have beat the Russians to space, but I guarantee they've beat the Americans to this... they've had that manned space station up there for a while. How could it NOT have happened?


    /\ X | O M
    1. Re:Russians have been doing it for a while... by TummyX · · Score: 1

      I think the Russians bet Americans to space ...which is why Americans where so intent on beating the Russians to the moon.

    2. Re:Russians have been doing it for a while... by RelliK · · Score: 1
      Americans may have beat the Russians to space

      Uhhm... no. Get your facts straight. Russians were first to:
      1. Launch a satillite
      2. Launch a manned space craft
      3. Have a man in open space (outside space craft)
      4. Build space station.


      The *only* thing Americans did first is go to the moon. I guess they don't teach you history in school do they?

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    3. Re:Russians have been doing it for a while... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that they also were teh first to:
      1. Put a woman into space
      2. Land a probe on venus

      We beat them to the moon, but that's about all, so far.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  114. More classic filks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  115. i suggest the astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...really bone up on this subject.

    but seriously, what is the international perspective? Russia had a real space station before anyone else, and europeans tend to be much more open about sex and friendship than americans.

    did men and women crew mir together? i can't remember. not to say there couldn't be gay/lesbian couplings as well, that certainly qualifies as sex.

    any of our russian friends care to comment? or anyone familiar with earth's other space programs?

  116. Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got done reading Contact by carl sagan. IN case you haven't read it yet the main character(ellie), gets into a long talk with another one of the main characters about sex in space. he lives in a space station and regularly hires prostitues from earth to "please" him.

    it brings to mind some really odd positions. Have you ever seen those movies made by skydivers where they get together into a massive circle? awwwww yeah.....

  117. nice thoughts by serialk · · Score: 1

    this is something they should have experimented

    with a while ago :)

  118. TIP: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use oil based lubricants before submersion... :)

  119. Uranus by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    Well, with the ratio of 'manned' to co-ed flights, I would venture to say they'd been there already. ;-)

    Maybe that's why NASA hasn't said much - not only are the astronauts having sex, they're having Grecian male orgies! The shuttle smells of musk and boodie funk! Woo!

    The Divine Creatrix in a Mortal Shell that stays Crunchy in Milk

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  120. idea! by Uart · · Score: 1

    It'll be the first televised space mission since the Appollo missions that actually gets good ratings!!!!

    But seriously, i'd volunteer for that mission... all in the name of science right?

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  121. ISS "Freedom" and double occupancy room by noahm · · Score: 1
    I don't have a reference for this; I'm pulling it all from memory. It ran in either Scientific American or Air & Space Smithsonian in 1991 or so. In any case, apparently there was originally a plan for a two person bedroom on the International Space Station. It was intended to be used for married couples working on the station. However, it was decided that there would not commonly be married couples on the station, so they removed this room from the plan...or changed its function or something like that. They didn't want it to be used by non-married couples, and they couldn't afford to have that valuable space go unused.


    So it appears that they've addressed this point to some degree. It's only a matter of time before (very wealthy) people are able to go into space for pleasure, so sex in space is going to happen eventually...It sounds interesting, really! 8^)


    noah

  122. a study on propulsion by Slur · · Score: 1

    curious how the motions of manual masturbation would cause your body to rotate in zero-g...

    IF THE SHUTLLES ROCKIN' DON'T COME KNOCKIN'



    --------
    Yeah, I'm a Mac programmer. You got a problem with that?

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  123. But What Will We Call It? by john_boy · · Score: 0

    The super mile-high club? Mile-high2k? The planet-high club? These are issues that need to be addressed!

    John

  124. NASA saved! by Andaire · · Score: 1

    /. finds a way to save the faster, better, cheaper initiative...

  125. underwater sex isn't safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the repreated in-out motion forces water up into the woman's cervix and stuff and can cause infection and other side effects.

  126. Interesting question... by robs · · Score: 2

    If ever you have the chance to read "Exit Earth" by Martin Caidin, it has a scene dealing specifically with zero-g sex. It's by no means a literary masterpiece, so I wouldn't go read it just to find out what he wrote about zero-g sex.

    That now begs for further questions. How fast would one be propelled forward if they were to "cut the cheese"? Or how much fun would it be to race in the space station while holding onto a vaccuum?

  127. "In space nobody can hear you scream" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    grin.

  128. Mile High Club by InfiniteReality · · Score: 1

    Sex in space gives new meaning to this term.

  129. The Millennium is not till next year!!! by Archimede · · Score: 1

    They have over a year to find out how its going to be before the end of the Millennium. How many of you actually believe its the end of 1999?? Would you believe its really not till dec 31st 2000?? So why is everyone using that word a year before it actually is the Millenium??

  130. Three dolphins club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In his Mars trilogy, Ian Douglas addresses this same issue. Instead of the mile high club, the characters at NASA have a "Three Dolphins Club." Apparently, sex in space might be remarkably like sex underwater.

    Douglas states that Dolphins often have sex in threes, 2 to do it, and one to sort of be a spotter. I'm not sure of the veracity of his claim, and its relation to animals that have arms for grasping is obscure, but the astronauts in his book apparently decided that groups of 3 was the way to go.

    They also remarked that sweat doesn't fall off in zero g, it simply aerosols to fill the room with tiny little droplets.

  131. Eileen Collins is a BABE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I believe she's some sort of Bible-thumper, based on reported comments made around the time of her mission. :-(

  132. I can see the headlines now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First prostitute in space!
    Prostitute hired for the good of Science.\
    Astonaughts get jiggy with hired help.

    When you think about it prostituion is only illegal on the state level... And there are not states in space.

  133. Jo mata. by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    It's not that difficult of a concept. If two people wanted to have sex, by about the second or third try they would have a method worked out. You just stick it in the out-hole, latch on, and let her rip. Of course now problems may arise. "Love juices" (as Nick so delicately labeled them) would inevitably be all over the place, the friction and likely bouncing would be an interesting task with no gravity to hold you down (or bounce from), and for Pete's sake, what does one do if he hits the wrong button in the act? Assuming everything goes well and you get your business taken care of, cleaned up, etc., you have only one real problem left - conception. The chances of it occurring are slim to none, considering that without gravity the "boys" won't have much to swim through. But then again, it may be easier, considering gravity isn't holding them back. It's all relative though. I don't even remember the actual question that started this. So, if I were given the opportunity to have sex in space, I'd give it a "Hell yes!" and move on with my life. NEXT!

  134. "Challenger go with throttle up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No no shit head 'Throttle' up, THROTTLE. Oh fuck..." boom. crackle.....

  135. 300 mile High Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got to admit it would be a pretty select group. Thats got to be some serious bragging rights.

  136. *** moderate this up ** by RelliK · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if the guy is serious (about the sex part :-) but it sure does sound interesting. I was not sure wether to laugh or take it at face value.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  137. My senior thesis by Voltage_Gate · · Score: 1

    At the risk of coming off as a quack, I'm considering doing my senior thesis on altered G biology (trust me, I'm not offtopic). I need to find some small or micro organisms and mate them, or simply perform an artificial selection with an asexual species under hypergravity. My method will be to centrifuge them for months, building to a crushing force and see how they adapt. (I promise I won't use and mammals or anything higher than a worm). As for sub-one-G forces, that'll be tricky without a space shuttle. I'm sure my school doesn't have one. If anyone from NASA reads this and is excited, please contact me. Or go ahead and steal my idea, that's the trendy thing to do these days.

  138. Reality Check by swerdloff · · Score: 1
    Face it: wouldn't you want to experiment with Zero-G lovemaking if you had a chance to do so - and you had a willing partner available whose curiosity quotient was as high as yours?

    Well of course we would, don't be ridiculous.

    Then again, Face it: wouldn't most slashdot readers like to experiment with _any_ lovemaking, if they had the chance to do so - and a willing partner whose curiosity quotient was as high as theirs?

  139. The life of an onion not knowing up from down by billstewart · · Score: 1
    There was a research paper by that title* a couple decades ago. As a trial on the ground, they kept turning the growing dish over constantly; the onions weren't able to figure out which way to send roots and which way to send stems, and didn't do very well.

    Perhaps animals are more adaptable, but perhaps not. I'd say that pregnancy without at least _some_ spin-based gravity would be a seriously bad idea - the risk of bad fetal development is compunded by the difficulty of medical care during pregnancy and birth. Certainly not safe to do it until tests on monkeys have worked, and we shouldn't do them until lower animals like guinea pigs have worked.

    On the other hand, sex in space sounds just fine :-)


    * Or maybe it was "down from up"....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  140. Heterosexual bias.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    While my own preferences are straight, I'd agree that probably hasn't been the case for all cosmonauts, astronauts, etc.

    But most space flights have been pretty heavily monitored - they'd at least have turned the radios off for a while :-)

  141. Free Mars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (Sorry, but someone had to say it :-)


    Not really much different than being born on a ship.

  142. Red Mars by Paradigm_ · · Score: 1

    I think that this is actually going to cause a lot of problems on future long-term missions... Red Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson explores this quite well... Can you really expect a mixed crew not to have sexual urges over 6 months, let alone the 2.5 years it might take to complete a mars mission?

  143. a better way? by noire · · Score: 1

    I've got a better idea: make it a requirement that the guys get vasectomies -- it's a much easier surgery to preform and therefore a lot less stupid of an idea.

  144. Heinlein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the two or three here who may not have read it, read Robert Heinlein's classic "Stranger in a Strange Land." I'd also recommend "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" and "Friday." One of his other works (don't remember offhand) talked of lunar hotels with huge rooms where visitors could strap on wings and fly around in the low-G. THAT would be even funner than 0-G sex.

  145. Ewwww! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Damnit! I was eating! Now I've got to mop the puke out of the keyboard.

    Please, never, ever bring HER uo again.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  146. Lets be serious.... by ph0rk · · Score: 1



    ok, pause for a moment, and imagine being cooped up in a metal tube, probably not much bigger than a submarine. say you have 12-20 crewmates, and just for kicks lets assume that your crewmates are a 50/50 male/female split (that's 6-10 females and 6-10 males, not a bunch of quasi-hermaphrodites, for the sticklers out there).


    ok. you are now 13 months into your 30 month mission, and, sadly, you are horny as hell (male or female, honestly, it doesn't matter, and anyone that says it does in a small 20 person microsociety like this needs to read up). Even without the presence of alcohol, most body attractiveness concerns will fly right out the window at around 2 or 3 months into the mission.


    So. here we are. is anyone gonna try and tell me now that sex wouldn't happen? repeatedly? (the rules about crewmembers having sex in piers anthony's 'ghost' and 'bio of a space tyrant' series just seem a matter of common sense).

    really think here, it's one thing to be celibate for a year or more, but quite another to try and be so while in continued contact with the same 10 members of the opposite sex, eating together, working together, running treadmills, etc.

    The mere exposure effect is a (testable) theory in social psychology that states, (plainly) the more we are exposed to individuals (that we do not for other reasons strongly dislike) the more we will 'like' them, and favor their company. (there have been experiments with college students being better friends gradually with those living closer to them in a dorm).


    Seriously, these crewmates are gonna bone the heck out of each other, like crazy.

    it might make real sense for NASA to consider STD testing pre-mission, and packing lots of birth control...

    --
    semantics are everything!
  147. new website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whatever the conclusions, I'm running out to register www.ourfirsttimeinspace.com right now. :P -Buckthorn

  148. Get some facts by PD · · Score: 1

    One of the modes of operation is indeed prevention of implantation. Not the only one though.

    From www.plannedparenthood.com:

    "The Pill" is the common name for oral contraception. There are two basic types-combination pills and progestin-only pills. Both are made of hormones like those
    made by a woman's ovaries-estrogen and progestin. Combination pills contain both hormones. Progestin-only pills contain only progestin. Both kinds of pills require
    a medical evaluation and prescription.

    Both kinds of pills are intended to prevent pregnancy. But they work differently. Combination pills usually work by preventing a woman's ovaries from releasing eggs
    (ovulation). Progestin-only pills also can prevent ovulation. But they usually work by thickening the cervical mucus. This keeps sperm from joining with an egg.
    Combination pills also thicken cervical mucus. Both types of pill may also prevent fertilized eggs from implanting in the uterus (womb).

  149. tAliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    heh.