Re:The best indicator of my enjoyment of a film...
on
Iron Man Released
·
· Score: 1
If you can even call that good special effects. CGI does nothing to convince me of the feats in a film, it all looks fake due to a combination of poor lighting, texturing, or animation. Giant robots may avoid some of those problems simply from being shiny, mechanical characters, but the Transformers' general redesign and overabundance of human story elements made sure that the film would be a letdown. That is assuming that you even can be letdown after seeing Micheal Bay's name on a film... You just kind of have to expect mediocrity (and explosions!) at that point.
Wasn't Campbell part of the Lovecraft Circle? That may explain a lot of his attitude, as those guys freely used each other's story assets to create an extremely varied mythology.
That's a good sideeffect however. As someone who refuses to partake in either, I can say without bias that marijuana is far less dangerous than alcohol could ever hope to be.
Or better yet, don't live in the city at all! Don't park on the street, use your driveway or garage. People that park on the street simply take up space on the street and often essentially turn it into one lane for those of us who are driving. Also, buy a nice big handgun and wear it strapped under your shoulder while out cutting the grass and such. Make it known, because no one is going to assess the risk factor in that and still proceed with robbing you.
No. They totally missed the point before, and it sounds like now they're just trying to latch on to an idea that helped others. The point of being a musician, or another kind of artist, is to share the art, not to make a profit. There's nothing wrong with expecting to make some money off of it, but that should not be the focus. Quoted for truth.
That said, I don't think I'd buy any future Metallica albums regardless. St. Anger downright blew.
[...]the story isn't just an amalgam of cut scenes and cleverly written dialogue[...] When has it ever been about that? There has rarely been anything in the way of a story, cut scenes have always sucked, and the dialog usually leans toward the "trying way too hard" type of humor that only impresses the juvenile.
That said, I liked the first two games in the series. I thought that the third installment was terrible, but was mostly remedied by the time San Andreas came about. I'm not drooling in delirium and counting the days until this game is released. I will however probably pick it up once it's released for the PC and give it an inquisitive trial.
I'm certainly no mathematician, and this questions does seem absolutely pointless, but I'm going to bet on "invented". Sure, quantities of objects (Which could be added, subtracted, etc) would still exist even had we not invented mathematics. But with that in mind, having not invented language wouldn't stop objects with assigned names from existing.
That just means that modern art is so meaningless and trite that no one knows what could be included as it. I just recently took a trip through the Dayton Art Institute and was seriously perplexed as to just how half of the junk in the "modern art" section managed to be relevant. The answer? It didn't. Not only were many of them simply splattered paint, but over half of the exhibits didn't even have names or titles! The hack that "painted" these can go on forever about how it "really expresses their angst toward the world, especially current politics", but you know what? That's bullshit, and none of it even comes close to being perceived if you were to simply look at the painting because it's nothing but flung-on pigments.
Of course, there was a nice Warhol and a few others to be found in the section that were art and not just meaningless, splattered colors.
I've always wondered this myself. I suppose the best explanation would be that most people who go down to Wal-Mart in order to purchase an operating system don't know any better. It's kind of sad, really.
If anyone can be accredited to truly pioneering the so-called fantasy genre, it would be Lord Dunsany. Of course, in that case, influence can obviously be traced back to more classical mythology, namely the Greco-Roman pantheons. Saying that Tolkien is the foundation for which without nothing else would exist is just the ignorant ramblings of an offended individual.
Tolkien's work, for better or for worse, is cliche. Don't concern yourself with the variety of races--all based in folklore--but with the overly simplistic plots that they follow. Also, let's not forget just how questionable the quality of his writing style itself is. Of course, perhaps these things were in fact what you had in mind, because I'll admit that most work found in the fantasy genre is extremely trite and cliche. Hardly the legacy one would desire, I think.
If you like Tolkien, that's fine. Read whatever you want, he certainly did have some standout moments in the vast body of work he put out. But don't for a minute believe that literature without him would be sorely lacking, because it wouldn't. Nothing he did was of any ideological importance, but was merely fluff with some strained allusions and metaphors sprinkled about.
No, the problem with Guillermo doing The Hobbit is that he wont be doing something else more unusual or unlikely. He is supposed to be getting on with an adaptation of H.P.Lovecraft's "At the Mountain's of Madness" and I personally would really like to see that. It's going to take someone of Guillermo's ability and heft to get this done properly. I'll be dissapointed if the Hobbit took its place. Agreed. So long as Guillermo sticks to a more conventional directing style, as in Devil's Backbone or Pan's Labyrinth. The burden of heavily used CGI (ala Hellboy) would isntantly destroy the feeling of any Lovecraftian tale.
That said, take a look at the H.P. Lovecraft Historical Society's film adaptation of The Call of Cthulhu. It's done as an old silent film and really came out awfully well. I believe that they're about to release their second film (a talkie this time), based on The Whisperer in Darkness.
I may be biased, but I find that the fantasy genre in general is rather shallow and cliche, Talkein's works included. Guillermo del Toro has proven that he can do truly great films, just watch Devil's Backbone or Pan's Labyrinth. Sadly, I feel that The Hobbit will be more akin to another Hellboy, which was yucky. The same goes for Peter Jackson though; Dead Alive and The Frighteners were wonderfully imaginative.
The Lord of the Rings is, sadly, just one big walking (and boy howdy is there plenty walking!) cliche after another. Not to mention the ridiculous reliance on CGI, which would quickly ruin any film. I'm far more interested in learning more about Toro's plans for "At the Mountains of Madness". So long as he stays away from that Hellboy style of directing, I think he could pull it off well.
How about instead of superficially keeping the high price of iPods stagnate by re-releasing and "upgrading" the player every year, Apple just lets it fall into a more comfortable range?
I'll give you that. I doubt many people would bother to put the ROM discs together however. There are plenty of collections out there for download--Genesis, NES, etc. Good SuperNES emulators are a little tricky to find however. I had one years ago that worked flawlessly, but never got the disc back after loaning it to a friend. All subsequent ones I've tried have had varying degrees of lag on many games.
Dreamcasts are cheaper and don't require modification to play ROMs and back-ups. Besides, the native games are much more fun than what the Xbox tended to offer.;)
The latest semi-official patches for Worms Armageddon have supported higher resolutions, as well as a plethora of other features. I hear they're trying to work their way of to just merging Armageddon with World Party so that both could benefit from what features it has over the other.
ou can get a PS2 for ~$100 and an additional controller + memory card for maybe another $20. That'd open up a whole WORLD of great co-op games designed for the exact kind of experience you're looking for. You can rent games from your neighborhood video store or from Gamefly.com for about $5 a pop or $20 a month. You could buy about any PS2 game for $20 nowadays. Or buy a modchip, for that matter.;)
I personally recommend that specific version of Rock Band. The lack of character customization really destroys a lot of what makes it truly special.
It's just too bad that you'd have to purchase a second controller for Guitar Hero to be truly fun for two people. With the guitars being a ridiculous $70, I don't see many people doing that... especially with the Wii version, where the guitar is just a shell piggybacking on the Wii remote's functionality.
Before buying a console just for one overpriced game bundle, try downloading Frets on Fire, Coffee's Ultimate Mod, and all of the ripped Guitar Hero songs. Load it up onto your PC and hook up some old, cheap guitar controllers (or just flip your keyboard upside down).
True. The problem is that most subcompact cars aren't practical either. Maybe for single people or childless couples, but for people with families these vehicles are entirely impractical. Thus the popularity of SUVs. Funny, almost every SUV I see on the road has one sole person driving in it. SUVs are a status symbol, not a lunge for practicality. Especially when you take into consideration the pitiful four wheel driver performances that they give to suburbanites who'll never need it anyway. Smalls cars seat four to five people, which is plenty for a family. Any four door would have enough leg room in back for the older kids too.
I would sit through four or five hours for a truly great film. My personal views of the source material aside, Jackson used far too much CGI in large quantities that stuck out like a sore thumb. The large majority of CGI (not just in the Lord of the Rings trilogy) looks fake, either through poor lighting and texturing techniques or mechanical animation. It's the kind of thing that instantly destroys ones suspension of disbelief. At least stop animation / claymation is tangible and real. It's actually there, and thus avoids many of the obvious pitfalls that CGI suffers from. That's kind of the fad nowadays though, so it's not as is he's the only one to have made such a mistake.
You'd have to be pretty egotistical to believe that Earth is the only life sustaining planet in all of the mind-bogglingly huge, ever-expanding universe.
Slashdot Mirror
If you can even call that good special effects. CGI does nothing to convince me of the feats in a film, it all looks fake due to a combination of poor lighting, texturing, or animation. Giant robots may avoid some of those problems simply from being shiny, mechanical characters, but the Transformers' general redesign and overabundance of human story elements made sure that the film would be a letdown. That is assuming that you even can be letdown after seeing Micheal Bay's name on a film... You just kind of have to expect mediocrity (and explosions!) at that point.
Wasn't Campbell part of the Lovecraft Circle? That may explain a lot of his attitude, as those guys freely used each other's story assets to create an extremely varied mythology.
That's a good sideeffect however. As someone who refuses to partake in either, I can say without bias that marijuana is far less dangerous than alcohol could ever hope to be.
I'm sure that is precisely what they intended. After all, this is what CGI has done to modern pop-cinema...
At least Star Trek is science fiction. That is much more than can be said about Star Wars!
It very often times is when it comes to video games at least...
Or better yet, don't live in the city at all! Don't park on the street, use your driveway or garage. People that park on the street simply take up space on the street and often essentially turn it into one lane for those of us who are driving. Also, buy a nice big handgun and wear it strapped under your shoulder while out cutting the grass and such. Make it known, because no one is going to assess the risk factor in that and still proceed with robbing you.
That said, I don't think I'd buy any future Metallica albums regardless. St. Anger downright blew.
That said, I liked the first two games in the series. I thought that the third installment was terrible, but was mostly remedied by the time San Andreas came about. I'm not drooling in delirium and counting the days until this game is released. I will however probably pick it up once it's released for the PC and give it an inquisitive trial.
I'm certainly no mathematician, and this questions does seem absolutely pointless, but I'm going to bet on "invented". Sure, quantities of objects (Which could be added, subtracted, etc) would still exist even had we not invented mathematics. But with that in mind, having not invented language wouldn't stop objects with assigned names from existing.
Of course, there was a nice Warhol and a few others to be found in the section that were art and not just meaningless, splattered colors.
There are plenty of nice cracks out there to make it a moot point. I've been using them for years.
I've always wondered this myself. I suppose the best explanation would be that most people who go down to Wal-Mart in order to purchase an operating system don't know any better. It's kind of sad, really.
Tolkien's work, for better or for worse, is cliche. Don't concern yourself with the variety of races--all based in folklore--but with the overly simplistic plots that they follow. Also, let's not forget just how questionable the quality of his writing style itself is. Of course, perhaps these things were in fact what you had in mind, because I'll admit that most work found in the fantasy genre is extremely trite and cliche. Hardly the legacy one would desire, I think.
If you like Tolkien, that's fine. Read whatever you want, he certainly did have some standout moments in the vast body of work he put out. But don't for a minute believe that literature without him would be sorely lacking, because it wouldn't. Nothing he did was of any ideological importance, but was merely fluff with some strained allusions and metaphors sprinkled about.
That said, take a look at the H.P. Lovecraft Historical Society's film adaptation of The Call of Cthulhu. It's done as an old silent film and really came out awfully well. I believe that they're about to release their second film (a talkie this time), based on The Whisperer in Darkness.
I may be biased, but I find that the fantasy genre in general is rather shallow and cliche, Talkein's works included. Guillermo del Toro has proven that he can do truly great films, just watch Devil's Backbone or Pan's Labyrinth. Sadly, I feel that The Hobbit will be more akin to another Hellboy, which was yucky. The same goes for Peter Jackson though; Dead Alive and The Frighteners were wonderfully imaginative.
The Lord of the Rings is, sadly, just one big walking (and boy howdy is there plenty walking!) cliche after another. Not to mention the ridiculous reliance on CGI, which would quickly ruin any film. I'm far more interested in learning more about Toro's plans for "At the Mountains of Madness". So long as he stays away from that Hellboy style of directing, I think he could pull it off well.
How about instead of superficially keeping the high price of iPods stagnate by re-releasing and "upgrading" the player every year, Apple just lets it fall into a more comfortable range?
I'll give you that. I doubt many people would bother to put the ROM discs together however. There are plenty of collections out there for download--Genesis, NES, etc. Good SuperNES emulators are a little tricky to find however. I had one years ago that worked flawlessly, but never got the disc back after loaning it to a friend. All subsequent ones I've tried have had varying degrees of lag on many games.
Dreamcasts are cheaper and don't require modification to play ROMs and back-ups. Besides, the native games are much more fun than what the Xbox tended to offer. ;)
The latest semi-official patches for Worms Armageddon have supported higher resolutions, as well as a plethora of other features. I hear they're trying to work their way of to just merging Armageddon with World Party so that both could benefit from what features it has over the other.
I personally recommend that specific version of Rock Band. The lack of character customization really destroys a lot of what makes it truly special.
Before buying a console just for one overpriced game bundle, try downloading Frets on Fire, Coffee's Ultimate Mod, and all of the ripped Guitar Hero songs. Load it up onto your PC and hook up some old, cheap guitar controllers (or just flip your keyboard upside down).
I would sit through four or five hours for a truly great film. My personal views of the source material aside, Jackson used far too much CGI in large quantities that stuck out like a sore thumb. The large majority of CGI (not just in the Lord of the Rings trilogy) looks fake, either through poor lighting and texturing techniques or mechanical animation. It's the kind of thing that instantly destroys ones suspension of disbelief. At least stop animation / claymation is tangible and real. It's actually there, and thus avoids many of the obvious pitfalls that CGI suffers from. That's kind of the fad nowadays though, so it's not as is he's the only one to have made such a mistake.
You'd have to be pretty egotistical to believe that Earth is the only life sustaining planet in all of the mind-bogglingly huge, ever-expanding universe.