One of the major reasons sited for growth in cost has new new technologies.
"Our new Life Extender Machine can keep your 84yr old grandma alive for six more months for a mere 10K/day. There's no price on love."
What's the income of the top compared to the average? The top 1% is getting rich a whole lot faster than the bottom 50%. I don't think they should be complaining.
Wiki
This is the right temperature for the earth because it's the one we're successful in. Maybe there's a condition in which all the deserts become farm lands and the the climate becomes temperate everywhere but there are far more scenarios where things would be worse with change.
I don't think it's a question of if humans would survive extreme climate change, just a question of how much of the population would survive. If our efforts have to mostly be focused on survival, I'm thinking much else that we spend time and money on now would fall to the wayside.
And if that fails, you can place a camcorder in front of the TV. I don't know why they waste so much money with these projects. They just need something that would be a hassle for regular users and give up the rest of the battle as not cost effective. It would be interesting to see their "piracy losses" compared to what what they spend on DRM schemes.
Yes because all the modern family needs is what they can get from their home plot. I wonder what the average would be for land needed per American. You would need land for food, growing trees, mineral resources ect.
Having said that, I do dimly recall some associate got drafted and trained only to miss the war and spend their time babysitting in France. So some of that did go on. The US did provide a considerable force to stabilize Western Germany, Austria, Italy, and Japan as well as providing a conventional force counterweight to the USSR empire.
I believe that was the solider class from Team Fortress 2.
I would think the best bet would be to take it to the local news. Sony might consider the $300 cheaper than having to go to court to overturn the other decision and deal with the negative publicity.
>>>First, why did the point of origin for the 9 symbol address have to be Earth's symbol? They weren't on Earth, and they weren't using the Earth gate.
Precisely. Which is why it didn't work until they changed their point-of-origin to the new planet. Please pay closer attention to the fake, make-believe magic incantations.;-)
>>>if no one has been on the ship since it was launched, why are the CO2 scrubbers full of gunk?
For the same reason why your car's engine oil would turn to with gunk if you left it sitting-around for 10,000 years.
>>>if the air has been leaking out of the ship since it was damaged, where is the new air coming from?
Good point. It's funny how all these problems just suddenly "happened" on precisely Day 3.6 Million of the ship's log, and humans just happened to be there.
They were entering it with the planet's symbol but needed to use Earth's for it to work. I'm guessing the 9th symbol doesn't work like the rest.
With the new gates they find, can't they use a 8 symbol code to open a gate back earth or do you need extra energy?
Slashdot Mirror
One of the major reasons sited for growth in cost has new new technologies. "Our new Life Extender Machine can keep your 84yr old grandma alive for six more months for a mere 10K/day. There's no price on love."
What's the income of the top compared to the average? The top 1% is getting rich a whole lot faster than the bottom 50%. I don't think they should be complaining. Wiki
(a) And what exactly does methane turn into as it floats around in the atmosphere?
(b) You're correct - oxidation of one CH4 molecule produces one CO2 molecule and two H2O molecules.
Well to be fair H2O is also a greenhouse gas.
It would be funny if the hedge just sold of it's shares for a 30% profit. That would probably raise a few flags though.
tv - cable/FIOS radio - internet radio? wireless - get google voice and link your cell and landline.
not when we burn more coal to stay warm.
This is the right temperature for the earth because it's the one we're successful in. Maybe there's a condition in which all the deserts become farm lands and the the climate becomes temperate everywhere but there are far more scenarios where things would be worse with change.
I don't think it's a question of if humans would survive extreme climate change, just a question of how much of the population would survive. If our efforts have to mostly be focused on survival, I'm thinking much else that we spend time and money on now would fall to the wayside.
Seems reasonable to me. They didn't have enough seats to let him fly standby. Much fuss about nothing.
Thanks for the text Mr2001
Not if you throw interest in there. Plus there's maintenance costs. 60K gets you enough for 2 people for upkeep and they would be underpaid.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34824610/ns/technology_and_science-science/?GT1=43001
The sneaky slugs seem to have stolen the genes that enable this skill from algae that they've eaten. With their contraband genes, the slugs can carry out photosynthesis — the process plants use to convert sunlight into energy.
I should buy stock in it, so when the insurance company screws me, it's actually looking out for my financial interests.
China and India are pretty close in population. Don't think it's a big enough difference for them to just overwhelm with with numbers.
Wasn't that the monster from The Never Ending Story?
2010 is a record year even in just the first month?
And if that fails, you can place a camcorder in front of the TV. I don't know why they waste so much money with these projects. They just need something that would be a hassle for regular users and give up the rest of the battle as not cost effective. It would be interesting to see their "piracy losses" compared to what what they spend on DRM schemes.
I was thinking the same thing. What's the other option?
And some strap it on themselves, does that mean we shouldn't reproduce?
Yes because all the modern family needs is what they can get from their home plot. I wonder what the average would be for land needed per American. You would need land for food, growing trees, mineral resources ect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_formation
Why not use one deck and shuffle after each hand? Guess people might mark cards or something like that to cheat.
Having said that, I do dimly recall some associate got drafted and trained only to miss the war and spend their time babysitting in France. So some of that did go on. The US did provide a considerable force to stabilize Western Germany, Austria, Italy, and Japan as well as providing a conventional force counterweight to the USSR empire.
I believe that was the solider class from Team Fortress 2.
I would think the best bet would be to take it to the local news. Sony might consider the $300 cheaper than having to go to court to overturn the other decision and deal with the negative publicity.
>>>First, why did the point of origin for the 9 symbol address have to be Earth's symbol? They weren't on Earth, and they weren't using the Earth gate.
Precisely. Which is why it didn't work until they changed their point-of-origin to the new planet. Please pay closer attention to the fake, make-believe magic incantations. ;-)
>>>if no one has been on the ship since it was launched, why are the CO2 scrubbers full of gunk?
For the same reason why your car's engine oil would turn to with gunk if you left it sitting-around for 10,000 years.
>>>if the air has been leaking out of the ship since it was damaged, where is the new air coming from?
Good point. It's funny how all these problems just suddenly "happened" on precisely Day 3.6 Million of the ship's log, and humans just happened to be there.
They were entering it with the planet's symbol but needed to use Earth's for it to work. I'm guessing the 9th symbol doesn't work like the rest.
With the new gates they find, can't they use a 8 symbol code to open a gate back earth or do you need extra energy?
Remember everything is flipped down under.