The best 'analogy' is if you drop two identical video cameras pointed perfectly at each other, one attached to a mass of 1 ton and another attached to a mass of 3 tons (to make air resistance negligent), and you have them film their fall, when you watch back the film you will see both cameras showing the same image of the camera in the same spot (only the backrounds would be different) because the cameras are identical and face parallel, mirroring each other, and fall at the same rate because size and shape and weight doesn't affect the fall.
Harass her and I'm sure Micro$oft will back her up with $$$$ of dollars and sue you.
Also, that home address information and telephone number is either wrong or outdated or the address info I found is outdated. However, as of APRIL 2002, her address is NOT what you said.
Her e-mail is valmalgal@attbi.com. Use that if you really NEED to contact her. The bright will figure out how I found out that you are wrong.
The judge ruled early on that Hooters wasn't a "cybersquatter," the name for Wildlife speculators who catch sought-after birds in about 30 places a year, hoping to resell them for hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Hooters(R) applied for trademark in 1994, a company which was founded in 1991. Grand opening was in 1996.
The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) didn't sue until 1999, but the judge said that five-year wait wasn't too long because WWF was too busy suing the-now "World Wresting Entertainment" company because they overrated the impact the Internet would have on business.
"By 1999, HOOTERS(R) restaurants had transformed into an essential marketing tool, with the ability to reach millions of potential customers throughout the United States and around the world," Pregerson said.
The court said HOOTERS altered their newest promotional materials at that time to add advertisements to drive traffic and money to the World Wildlife Fund web site.
"Clearly, HOOTERS(R) was capitalizing upon the traffic that was coming to HOOTERS(R) restaurants in search of the Wildlife Fund," Pregerson said.
Maybe because owning Deep Fritz is like having a Grandmaster caged up in your own home, one who tirelessly makes near-"perfect" moves?
Wouldn't it also be a great tool for analysis and to check what the best move, in a game you have played previously, would have been?
Wouldn't it improve your game?
People would buy Deep Fritz would use it for training. I've heard this about playing chess:
1/3 of your competition must be the same level as you are (makes for an even, fun game.)
1/3 of the competition should be stronger than you (to challenge yourself to advance and learn--why not learn from DeepFritz?)
1/3 of the practice competition should be weaker than you are (a match where you kick butt and raise your self-esteem after losing to higher competition [DeepFritz])
And, it doesn't take a genius to figure any of the above out (from your sig;)
There is nothing incorrect about what I said. Everything I stated I did do and the results were what I said. Then I just asked if somebody can try to clear their cache and do something with &partner=bob and report. Thank you. However, I said nothing incorrect.
"If a new computer or a software upgrade costs more than it's worth to you, don't buy it. After all, you don't have to upgrade. Software will run forever, and computer hardware will work as long as it is kept in good repair.
"Upgrading is often smart, because the quality of your tools--whether shovels, snow skis, or software--can have a big impact on your effectiveness and enjoyment. Upgrades can be worthwhile. Right now Microsoft is investing heavily to suggest that people upgrade their operating systems, but the world won't end for people who don't. "
Another quote: "Microsoft is always searching for the new thing that is coming along, whether it is in a research lab or at another company. "
And: "I gave a great deal of personal thought to the Internet back then and even wrote a memo on it. But we were cautious because the Internet had drawbacks - including capacity and security limitations -compared to what was possible using alternate approaches (...) As it happened, the lightning struck early. The public got a taste of interactivity on the Internet's World Wide Web and said, "We're not waiting for a better solution! Let's go!" (What better solution were they planning? Oh, MS passport??)
"I don't use a Mac. I use a Windows-based laptop computer with docking stations at home and work. The Apple Macintosh is a fine system, though. Microsoft has invested heavily in developing software for it since before the first Mac was released back in 1984. Microsoft is doing as much Macintosh software development now as at any time in the past. "
"I used to button my top button, and it took me a while to figure out that wasn't cool. So you'd better watch out for that one. "
"At any given moment, my company typically has as many customers playing our games online (at www.zone.com) as it has people using our online service. We don't know how to make money with online games yet, but we'll figure it out someday. " (1998)
"I didn't have any teachers I disliked, or who were unfairly critical of me. Actually, I've always wanted to go back and see a few of my teachers who put a lot of energy into working with me and who encouraged me. But there's a world of good things I don't have time for. I'll probably be old by the time I get around to it."
Also, I read on Bill Gates OWN HOMEPAGE that he denies ever saying the 640k comment he's credited to have spoken.
Actually, you and other replies to you are incorrect and exemplify why there are bugs like this.. You guys laugh at them, but I hope you guys aren't programmers or testers.
In fact, removing the whole &partner line works. (I did that before I even saw this post...) This lead me to believe that once you visit through a partner site, NYT leaves a cookie or-what-not and then doesn't even check the partner parameter anymore. See, you guys clicked on the original link (w/ =google) first, then edited the partner line, and say it still works! There's a likely possibility that NYT ignores the partner parameter as long as it finds a valid one already in the cookie cache.
Can somebody clear their cache, history, and cookies, then go to that URL with &partner=bob added and see what happens? Because this way you would be right... but you should still test before saying something as fact.
Also, for numbers between the dots in IP addresses, the cap is NOT usually 255.
Re:3d displays cannot work
on
3D LCD Display
·
· Score: 1
Monitors aren't meant to be seen from every angle, but mainly from direct, near front.
I just installed mandrake 6.0 (yeah i know 9.0 is out, just a coincidence.)
SOrry for being Offtopic, but how do I change resolutions in mandrake 6.0? I have like a 3xx by 3xx resolution so can't figure anything out! I need to have at least 1024 going then I will be able to figure out the gui because right now I can't see the whole screen.
I wish everything was equal everywhere but that's hard and impossible:/ The next best thing is equality in the small picture, ie neighborhoods. Whichever way a person's help is always SUPREME, be it local or remote across the ocean, time or money! No help is useless! Every help counts every where one can give it!
1997 - The American magazine Psychology Today's body image survey finds that 15 per cent of women and 11 per cent of men in the U.S. said they'd be willing to give up at least five years of their life in exchange for the ability to reach their desired weight. That same year Redux or Fen-phen is taken off the market after studies link it to heart valve disease.
EARLIER HIGH-FAT LOW-CARBS DIETS:
1900 to 1920 - Although unconfirmed, there is reason to believe that TAPEWORM diet pills were marketed in the U.S. during the first two decades of the 20th century. Women allegedly swallowed "magic" diet pills that were actually TAPEWORMS in capsules. After they had shed enough pounds, women would take deworming pills to rid themselves of the parasite. (!!!)
1961 - Herman Taller's Calories Don't Count, which recommends a diet high in fat and low in carbohydrates is a best seller in the U.S.
1967 - Physician Irwin Stillman publishes The Doctor's Quick Weight Loss Diet. He advocates a high-protein, low-carb diet, but includes a recommendation to drink 10 eight ounce glasses of water per day to combat "water loss." Twenty million people try it.
1972 - Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest coins the terms "junk food" and "empty calories" in reference to candy, snacks and soda.
Snapple introduces a new bottled fruit drink that is marketed as an healthier alternative to soft drinks.
And Robert Atkins publishes Diet Revolution which advocates eating all the fat you want as part of a high protein, low-carb diet. It quickly becomes a bestseller. (In 1992, he re-issues pretty much the same exact book.)
1982- Jane Fonda's Workout video is credited with creating the phenomenon of exercise videos. After selling millions of copies the tape was discontinued by the manufacturer after many of Jane's moves were found to be unsafe (!!!!)
1995 - North America sees a resurgence of low-carb, high-protein diets. (Back to this again!)
Also interesting : Bulemia first discussed in 1926, Anorexia brought to light in 1983 when a celebrities dies on stage; in 1929, Candy TV Ads say "candy is good for you."
Here's the truth. You can post disagree or agree if you wish.
People need to take responsibility for their own actions, good or bad outcome. It's not enough to blame/praise God. Or justify why others might be like they are.
People need to take responsibility.
Remember Darwin's theory. There will NEVER be equality. You will always have richer people and poorer people. Even if you clone the same person 6 Billion times, some will end up richer and some will end up poorer after time.
So why not let Darwin's theory do it's job? You can't stop it, anyway. If someone has a low IQ, poor upbringing, no education, then by nature that person ISN'T SUPPOSED to succeed--unless this gives them an advantage, of course. Anyway, people shouldn't worry about who they think is better off than them. I'm NOT SAYING THIS IS GOOD OR BAD, MAYBE I'D LOVE PERFECTION, but this is just fact.
Only by taking responsibility for yourself can one succeed in his or her objectives in life.
Power/money/etc will always be spread out differently. Even with the same equal IQ, looks, and upbringing (a perfect clone), one will be more successful and Darwin's theory will fade away those unsuccessful.*
Once again, I would LOVE it if there was no poverty and everything was ideal (Possibly less complaining?;) )
BUT, it's Survival of the fittest! It's not U.S.A.'s fault, it's not the WORLD's fault.
Survival of the Fittest will always happen and nothing will ever balance out.
By not interrupting it, at least the "lower-end" standard could be higher the next generation around.
Look I'm a nice guy, but lets speak realistically.
I'm NOT SAYING I'm FOR or AGAINST, but Darwin is JUST THE WAY IT IS. YOU CAN'T CHANGE IT. YOU CAN'T STOP IT.
*And even if you had 6 BILLION CLONES and money distribution/leadership/fear WAS EQUIVALENT (impossible), then NOTHING WOULD GET DONE and society would cease to exist, thus not being perfect. There's No Perfect society possible.
That's assuming the film mixes the flickering colors the same way that your eyes do at the same time. The photo image would then not be flickering so it could differ.
But because the web site owner bothered with the photos there MUST be some kind of a difference right?
That show freaking owns! It's a show where players try to guess who of them is the insider paid to keep them from winning money. Whoever knows the least about the mole gets booted every show. Great show! WHY WAS IT PULLED?
The winner was Bill, the admiral. Friday Sept. 7 they said the next episode will be the 14th. The week of Sept 11th, on Friday, America's FUNNIEST OME VIDEOS was on instead!
Apparently because Bill, an Admiral, was the Mole, ABC canned the show to avoid making the army/navy look bad. True! Thank disney.
The show returned in the summer.. to face AMERICAN "IDLE". Yes, people watched American Idol instead of The Mole.
So. The mole is a sweet show but they gave out too many easy clues like the episode 9 clue with AdMiRaL in green INTRO text, which I discovered.
Sign the mole 3 petition (come on SlashDot readers work together!) http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl /signed.cgi? mole3 8,500 SIGNATURES!
His sig originates from the fact that there was a Puzzle web site that was featured here a month or two ago. One question asked,
You have 2 condoms and 3 horney women waiting, how can you succeed and guarantee no STDs?
The answer is:
1) Put on both condoms 2) Have sex with woman #1 3) Remove top condom 4) Have sex with woman #2 5) put the outer condom back on, inverted, and have sex with woman #3
Sure double condoms might break, but this works! Try it this weekend!
Also, my SIG is pretty bad, too, Mr. Sig collector!
Slashdot Mirror
The best 'analogy' is if you drop two identical video cameras pointed perfectly at each other, one attached to a mass of 1 ton and another attached to a mass of 3 tons (to make air resistance negligent), and you have them film their fall, when you watch back the film you will see both cameras showing the same image of the camera in the same spot (only the backrounds would be different) because the cameras are identical and face parallel, mirroring each other, and fall at the same rate because size and shape and weight doesn't affect the fall.
Harass her and I'm sure Micro$oft will back her up with $$$$ of dollars and sue you.
Also, that home address information and telephone number is either wrong or outdated or the address info I found is outdated. However, as of APRIL 2002, her address is NOT what you said.
Her e-mail is valmalgal@attbi.com. Use that if you really NEED to contact her. The bright will figure out how I found out that you are wrong.
Not a 'cybersquatter'
The judge ruled early on that Hooters wasn't a "cybersquatter," the name for Wildlife speculators who catch sought-after birds in about 30 places a year, hoping to resell them for hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Hooters(R) applied for trademark in 1994, a company which was founded in 1991. Grand opening was in 1996.
The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) didn't sue until 1999, but the judge said that five-year wait wasn't too long because WWF was too busy suing the-now "World Wresting Entertainment" company because they overrated the impact the Internet would have on business.
"By 1999, HOOTERS(R) restaurants had transformed into an essential marketing tool, with the ability to reach millions of potential customers throughout the United States and around the world," Pregerson said.
The court said HOOTERS altered their newest promotional materials at that time to add advertisements to drive traffic and money to the World Wildlife Fund web site.
"Clearly, HOOTERS(R) was capitalizing upon the traffic that was coming to HOOTERS(R) restaurants in search of the Wildlife Fund," Pregerson said.
~xintegerx
So put him on ignore and stop replying to him.
http://832.796.835.918/ IS a valid URL. You are the first person for whom it doesn't work for. Did you visit the web site? What machine are you using?
Maybe because owning Deep Fritz is like having a Grandmaster caged up in your own home, one who tirelessly makes near-"perfect" moves?
;)
Wouldn't it also be a great tool for analysis and to check what the best move, in a game you have played previously, would have been?
Wouldn't it improve your game?
People would buy Deep Fritz would use it for training. I've heard this about playing chess:
1/3 of your competition must be the same level as you are (makes for an even, fun game.)
1/3 of the competition should be stronger than you (to challenge yourself to advance and learn--why not learn from DeepFritz?)
1/3 of the practice competition should be weaker than you are (a match where you kick butt and raise your self-esteem after losing to higher competition [DeepFritz])
And, it doesn't take a genius to figure any of the above out (from your sig
There is nothing incorrect about what I said. Everything I stated I did do and the results were what I said. Then I just asked if somebody can try to clear their cache and do something with &partner=bob and report. Thank you. However, I said nothing incorrect.
Bill Gates' #1 Prediction (1995)
"If a new computer or a software upgrade costs more than it's worth to you, don't buy it. After all, you don't have to upgrade. Software will run forever, and computer hardware will work as long as it is kept in good repair.
"Upgrading is often smart, because the quality of your tools--whether shovels, snow skis, or software--can have a big impact on your effectiveness and enjoyment. Upgrades can be worthwhile. Right now Microsoft is investing heavily to suggest that people upgrade their operating systems, but the world won't end for people who don't. "
Another quote: "Microsoft is always searching for the new thing that is coming along, whether it is in a research lab or at another company. "
And: "I gave a great deal of personal thought to the Internet back then and even wrote a memo on it. But we were cautious because the Internet had drawbacks - including capacity and security limitations -compared to what was possible using alternate approaches (...) As it happened, the lightning struck early. The public got a taste of interactivity on the Internet's World Wide Web and said, "We're not waiting for a better solution! Let's go!" (What better solution were they planning? Oh, MS passport??)
"I don't use a Mac. I use a Windows-based laptop computer with docking stations at home and work. The Apple Macintosh is a fine system, though. Microsoft has invested heavily in developing software for it since before the first Mac was released back in 1984. Microsoft is doing as much Macintosh software development now as at any time in the past. "
"I used to button my top button, and it took me a while to figure out that wasn't cool. So you'd better watch out for that one. "
"At any given moment, my company typically has as many customers playing our games online (at www.zone.com) as it has people using our online service. We don't know how to make money with online games yet, but we'll figure it out someday. " (1998)
"I didn't have any teachers I disliked, or who were unfairly critical of me. Actually, I've always wanted to go back and see a few of my teachers who put a lot of energy into working with me and who encouraged me. But there's a world of good things I don't have time for. I'll probably be old by the time I get around to it."
Also, I read on Bill Gates OWN HOMEPAGE that he denies ever saying the 640k comment he's credited to have spoken.
-----
Actually, you and other replies to you are incorrect and exemplify why there are bugs like this.. You guys laugh at them, but I hope you guys aren't programmers or testers.
In fact, removing the whole &partner line works. (I did that before I even saw this post...) This lead me to believe that once you visit through a partner site, NYT leaves a cookie or-what-not and then doesn't even check the partner parameter anymore. See, you guys clicked on the original link (w/ =google) first, then edited the partner line, and say it still works! There's a likely possibility that NYT ignores the partner parameter as long as it finds a valid one already in the cookie cache.
Can somebody clear their cache, history, and cookies, then go to that URL with &partner=bob added and see what happens? Because this way you would be right... but you should still test before saying something as fact.
Also, for numbers between the dots in IP addresses, the cap is NOT usually 255.
Monitors aren't meant to be seen from every angle, but mainly from direct, near front.
Nothing happens!
I just installed mandrake 6.0 (yeah i know 9.0 is out, just a coincidence.)
SOrry for being Offtopic, but how do I change resolutions in mandrake 6.0? I have like a 3xx by 3xx resolution so can't figure anything out! I need to have at least 1024 going then I will be able to figure out the gui because right now I can't see the whole screen.
Thank you guys!
I wish everything was equal everywhere but that's hard and impossible :/ The next best thing is equality in the small picture, ie neighborhoods. Whichever way a person's help is always SUPREME, be it local or remote across the ocean, time or money! No help is useless! Every help counts every where one can give it!
Interesting STUFFe wycenter_timeline.html
From http://fitfat.ctvnews.com/interactive/timeline/ch
VERY INTERESTING:
1997 - The American magazine Psychology Today's body image survey finds that 15 per cent of women and 11 per cent of men in the U.S. said they'd be willing to give up at least five years of their life in exchange for the ability to reach their desired weight. That same year Redux or Fen-phen is taken off the market after studies link it to heart valve disease.
EARLIER HIGH-FAT LOW-CARBS DIETS:
1900 to 1920 - Although unconfirmed, there is reason to believe that TAPEWORM diet pills were marketed in the U.S. during the first two decades of the 20th century. Women allegedly swallowed "magic" diet pills that were actually TAPEWORMS in capsules. After they had shed enough pounds, women would take deworming pills to rid themselves of the parasite. (!!!)
1961 - Herman Taller's Calories Don't Count, which recommends a diet high in fat and low in carbohydrates is a best seller in the U.S.
1967 - Physician Irwin Stillman publishes The Doctor's Quick Weight Loss Diet. He advocates a high-protein, low-carb diet, but includes a recommendation to drink 10 eight ounce glasses of water per day to combat "water loss." Twenty million people try it.
1972 - Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest coins the terms "junk food" and "empty calories" in reference to candy, snacks and soda.
Snapple introduces a new bottled fruit drink that is marketed as an healthier alternative to soft drinks.
And Robert Atkins publishes Diet Revolution which advocates eating all the fat you want as part of a high protein, low-carb diet. It quickly becomes a bestseller. (In 1992, he re-issues pretty much the same exact book.)
1982- Jane Fonda's Workout video is credited with creating the phenomenon of exercise videos. After selling millions of copies the tape was discontinued by the manufacturer after many of Jane's moves were found to be unsafe (!!!!)
1995 - North America sees a resurgence of low-carb, high-protein diets. (Back to this again!)
Also interesting : Bulemia first discussed in 1926, Anorexia brought to light in 1983 when a celebrities dies on stage; in 1929, Candy TV Ads say "candy is good for you."
Well, she DID receive 4x so it's NOT TRUE to say she was awarded less than 1x. SHE OPTED for less than 1x. The ruling was 4x. ;)
Here's the truth. You can post disagree or agree if you wish.
;) )
People need to take responsibility for their own actions, good or bad outcome. It's not enough to blame/praise God. Or justify why others might be like they are.
People need to take responsibility.
Remember Darwin's theory. There will NEVER be equality. You will always have richer people and poorer people. Even if you clone the same person 6 Billion times, some will end up richer and some will end up poorer after time.
So why not let Darwin's theory do it's job? You can't stop it, anyway. If someone has a low IQ, poor upbringing, no education, then by nature that person ISN'T SUPPOSED to succeed--unless this gives them an advantage, of course. Anyway, people shouldn't worry about who they think is better off than them. I'm NOT SAYING THIS IS GOOD OR BAD, MAYBE I'D LOVE PERFECTION, but this is just fact.
Only by taking responsibility for yourself can one succeed in his or her objectives in life.
Power/money/etc will always be spread out differently. Even with the same equal IQ, looks, and upbringing (a perfect clone), one will be more successful and Darwin's theory will fade away those unsuccessful.*
Once again, I would LOVE it if there was no poverty and everything was ideal (Possibly less complaining?
BUT, it's Survival of the fittest! It's not U.S.A.'s fault, it's not the WORLD's fault.
Survival of the Fittest will always happen and nothing will ever balance out.
By not interrupting it, at least the "lower-end" standard could be higher the next generation around.
Look I'm a nice guy, but lets speak realistically.
I'm NOT SAYING I'm FOR or AGAINST, but Darwin is JUST THE WAY IT IS. YOU CAN'T CHANGE IT. YOU CAN'T STOP IT.
*And even if you had 6 BILLION CLONES and money distribution/leadership/fear WAS EQUIVALENT (impossible), then NOTHING WOULD GET DONE and society would cease to exist, thus not being perfect. There's No Perfect society possible.
So what is everyone's opinion on this?
According to the article, the lady DID receive punitive damages--3x the medical bills. So she basically won 4x what her medical bills were.
As long as they get something accomplished, though maybe after two weeks instead of an hour, a company is happy.
No. I am absolutely tootely correct. Re-read.
That's assuming the film mixes the flickering colors the same way that your eyes do at the same time. The photo image would then not be flickering so it could differ.
But because the web site owner bothered with the photos there MUST be some kind of a difference right?
This is the 'net though..
That show freaking owns! It's a show where players try to guess who of them is the insider paid to keep them from winning money. Whoever knows the least about the mole gets booted every show. Great show!
l /signed.cgi? mole3
WHY WAS IT PULLED?
The winner was Bill, the admiral. Friday Sept. 7 they said the next episode will be the 14th. The week of Sept 11th, on Friday, America's FUNNIEST OME VIDEOS was on instead!
Apparently because Bill, an Admiral, was the Mole, ABC canned the show to avoid making the army/navy look bad. True! Thank disney.
The show returned in the summer..
to face AMERICAN "IDLE". Yes, people watched American Idol instead of The Mole.
So. The mole is a sweet show but they gave out too many easy clues like the episode 9 clue with AdMiRaL in green INTRO text, which I discovered.
Sign the mole 3 petition (come on SlashDot readers work together!)
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_per
8,500 SIGNATURES!
His sig originates from the fact that there was a Puzzle web site that was featured here a month or two ago. One question asked,
You have 2 condoms and 3 horney women waiting, how can you succeed and guarantee no STDs?
The answer is:
1) Put on both condoms
2) Have sex with woman #1
3) Remove top condom
4) Have sex with woman #2
5) put the outer condom back on, inverted, and have sex with woman #3
Sure double condoms might break, but this works! Try it this weekend!
Also, my SIG is pretty bad, too, Mr. Sig collector!
Just patent the idea. I think you have like a year after the development is made public to patent it.
Then make it open source/free.
Only you, however, will be able to re-sell the idea to big companies.
And, I get 10% of the cut for this consultation.
By reading this and following through you agree to this EULA.
~xintegerx
Yes there is a difference...
The difference is that you can the end result is different between true 64,000 and fake 58,000 colors made out of 4,000.
See http://www.geocities.com/an0nym0vs when it's not slashdotted.
It's called a plateau-- if he sticks with his fitness he will pass his plateau and continue dropping pounds.