Slashdot Mirror


Comedy Central Cancels BattleBots

Rathian writes "Bad news for BattleBot lovers, I saw on the BattleBots Builder's Forum that CC is NOT going to film Phase 6.0 of BattleBots. You can see copies of the email from the BattleBots founders Trey & Greg at RobotCombat.com, and at Team DaVinci Robots God willing, another network will pick it up and keep this sport alive!"

350 comments

  1. That stinks... by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    BattleBots was the most innovative show on TV... i loved it ... sad to see it go.

    --
    100% Insightful
    1. Re:That stinks... by puff-d-dwaggie · · Score: 0

      Innovative?

      I suppose next you are going to try to convince us that pro wrestling and football arent all preplanned...oh, wait, mebbe thats just wrestling, or is it? I dunno..anyhow,,,life goes on.

      "Get Moose and Squirrel!"

    2. Re:That stinks... by schon · · Score: 1

      Innovative?

      Maybe he works for Microsoft? :o)

    3. Re:That stinks... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

      This my first slashdot troll. but i must say Battlebots sucked. It didn't fit on CC either. Frankly, I thought fighting robots would be very cool, unfortunately in reality with BB and the RW's it is very boring. Maybe they can bring back Stranger's with Candy now? That was funny, battlebots is not (or even fun to watch) the show can go to tech tv or something, where it won't detract from worthwhile programming.

    4. Re:That stinks... by op00to · · Score: 1

      Here, Here! Battlebots was so lame, it really bored me. Robot Wars is slightly better, but the version I saw in london was ridiculously hilarious. You get bored of battling robots after a show or two. Case in point: there are only like 3 or 4 different types of robots, and usually the spinner robot owns everyone. Whatever.

      What I'D like to see is either UCB back again or even better, THE STATE which was on MTV. Also acceptable: Beavis and Butthead.

    5. Re:That stinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *EXACTLY*! Battlebots never belonged on Comedy Central. It's not comedy, and is not funny.

      It belongs on the Dumb Network, along with American Idol, pro wrestling, Survivor, Road Rules, anything to do with monster trucks.

      The commercials should all be those Terry Bradshaw ones in which he tries to get you to buy things because you're impressed at his lack of knowledge of sushi. Oh, and Carrot Top. Yes, lots of Carrot Top.

    6. Re:That stinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *EXACTLY*! Battlebots never belonged on Comedy Central. It's not comedy, and is not funny.

      And this differs from most of the fodder on Comedy Central in what way?

    7. Re:That stinks... by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Hey man. I NEED at least five hours a day of mid-'90s SNL reruns. I NEED them.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    8. Re:That stinks... by Foxman98 · · Score: 2

      I would LOVE to see Beavis and Butthead come back - that duo provided me with so many laughs it's no even funny? Anyone else out there a big fan?

      --
      S.t.e.v.e.
    9. Re:That stinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll toast to that

    10. Re:That stinks... by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      BattleBots was cool but Junkyard Wars was better. I'd love to see a weekly show that combined the two. You have to compete your teams robot.. but you have to build it in one day from parts on hand. That'd be more challenging and would even things up a little as you wouldn't need to invest a lot of your own money.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    11. Re:That stinks... by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

      Beavis and Butthead was hilarious. The movie was the pinnacle of stupidity... but it was awesome!!! Mike Judge rules!

      --
      100% Insightful
    12. Re:That stinks... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

      The state, was awesome. The bit where they hunt and eat muppets was the funniest thing I ever saw.

      I'm gonna dip my balls in it.

  2. A sport? by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

    Battlebots is quite entertaining, but I would hardly call it a sport.

    --

    Not everyone deserves a 320i

    1. Re:A sport? by eric2hill · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      POKE 65495,0...
      My computer sped up quite a bit after viewing your sig. Thank you!

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    2. Re:A sport? by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      You are most welcome..

      I can still remember the day I found out about that POKE. My life was never quite the same again.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    3. Re:A sport? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

      Battlebots is quite entertaining, but I would hardly call it a sport.

      Some people have some strange ideas of what makes a sport:

      Marge: Homer, Homer?
      Homer: Huh? Wah? Oh, How was bowling?
      Marge: It's a very challenging hobby.
      Homer: Heh heh, It's a sport dear. It's a sport you silly thing.

      GMD

    4. Re:A sport? by laserjet · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I am only 22 and I know what that does. Does that make me old?

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    5. Re:A sport? by McSpew · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Mine worked okay with 65495,0 but 65497,0 blew it out of the water.

    6. Re:A sport? by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      Nope... It just means you know how to use Google.

      Now, if you have typed it, that is something else altogether.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    7. Re:A sport? by sinserve · · Score: 1

      I just turned 22, and just learnt what that means 4 days ago: I just bought a //e for $12,
      it comes with the 2 disks, manuals (user's guide, programmer's guide, applesoft tutorial and
      manual, disk 2 manual, rom listing, etc.) but no DOS, so I am stuck with the monitor :-(

    8. Re:A sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can one of you faygs quite blowing each other and explain what this POKE crap means?

    9. Re:A sport? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      heh..you still use one of those? Hopefully you have a model with a real keyboard :)

    10. Re:A sport? by sdduuuude · · Score: 1

      It can be considered a sport because it is a great competition, which is really why we watch sports. BattleBots is very real and very structured with a single-elimination format. Granted, it isn't an athletic sport, but if you thinkg auto racing, horse racing, golf and bowling are sports, BattleBots is as well, and much more exciting to watch. Plus, from a viewers perspective, it looks EXACTLY like a sport. It is just as likely to end up on Fox Sports Net as it is TLC. D

    11. Re:A sport? by shepd · · Score: 1

      What is a sport then?

      Before you answer, consider that most think of Darts, Bowling, Mini-Golf, and Billiards as sports, even if they aren't major ones.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:A sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a the rule: anything you can do while smoking a cigarette and drinking a beer is not a sport, it's a game. Bowling is not a sport, golf is not a sport, and battlebots is not a sport.

    13. Re:A sport? by racerx509 · · Score: 1

      "Battlebots is quite entertaining, but I would hardly call it a sport."

      Don't you mean. Battlebots is quite entertaining, I would hardly call it a sport.

      --
      13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
    14. Re:A sport? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      Oh Christ!

      That really brings back long-dormant memories! That was standard in all my cheesy BASIC programs. I first found it in a magazine. How exactly did that work? I heard that it prevented the machine from constantly checking to see if a game cartridge had been inserted.

      I had a whopping 32K RAM and "Extended, COLOR BASIC", woo hoo!

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    15. Re:A sport? by 72beetle · · Score: 2

      I too remember the thrill of popping off the 16k button and replacing it with a shiny new 32k one! Back then 32k was seriously tuff stuff.

      I don't remember which address it was, but there was a POKE on the CoCo that would throw a relay somewhere in the guttyworks - a quick 2-line basic proggy would set the computer to constantly throwing the relay, making a hella racket and eventually burning out and trashing the computer. I used to do this to all the CoCo's on display, especially at the RS Computer Center downtown.

      Ahh, youth!

      -72

      --
      -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
    16. Re:A sport? by andyt · · Score: 1

      Neither darts nor mini-golf, nor billiards are a sport. Bowling and Snooker are, but not billiards or pool.

      The definition of a sport is "Any competitive event that cannot be undertaken whilst smoking."

    17. Re:A sport? by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Any competitive event that cannot be undertaken whilst smoking.

      You should check out a bowling alley in a city that doesn't ban smoking, then. ;-)

      I've seen clouds in the sky less dense than the ones in bowling alleys.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  3. Why? by Slarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to be a troll, but the whole BattleBots concept has gone from new and fun to watch to rather dull within the span of a couple of years. That's why they had to throw Carmen Electra on, right? People weren't watching, and a little sex appeal was required?

    Not that I don't think something BattleBots-ish won't survive for a while, but I doubt it'll be for long. Just a prediction.

    --
    Hi... I'm Larry... the shivering chipmunk... brrrrr!... I'm cold... I need a sweater...
    1. Re:Why? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to be a troll, but the whole BattleBots concept has gone from new and fun to watch to rather dull within the span of a couple of years. That's why they had to throw Carmen Electra on, right? People weren't watching, and a little sex appeal was required?


      I would put it more towards the stupid rules that they had imposed. Stuff like weapons limits and all that.

      I stopped watching after last season because I knew that it would just be yet another batch of improvements upon the same old designs with maybe one or two new ideas thrown in there for the mix.

      I want my large caliber projectiles and I want them now.

    2. Re:Why? by rczyzewski · · Score: 0

      It was great for my college days because we could watch it right before/after South Park (forget which). The hobby will survive, just not be televised in a few years. Then in 10 or 15 years it will come back as "The New BattleBots" like RollerDerby did. And the cycle shall continue.

    3. Re:Why? by axxackall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      New bot design ideas would follow after new arena design ideas. It is boring to see the flat arena, even with small odds around. "Robotica" has much more interesting competition conditions. That's the way to go. Build big and complicated mazes, put there more agressive arena bots, change maze planning all the time. Or begone!

      --

      Less is more !
    4. Re:Why? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I think part of the problem was that the machines were totally non-humanoid. When you have a little wedge running around on wheels, most people are not going to be able to anthropomorphize it and care whether it wins or loses*.
      Humanoid shapes are obviously not optimal for most machine combat applications, but IMO this type of series would be a lot more popular if the robots were at least five feet tall and walked on two legs... and were armed with more interesting weapons. Something like those big-gun radio controlled warship games people play, but with scale battlemechs instead of WWII naval craft.

      * I realize these are remote-controlled machines.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:Why? by patchmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it started to go downhill when the hazards became almost as important as the opposing robot. I wanted to see robots do battle, not have the robots getting beaten up by the ring. It was particularly nasty for the lightweight bots that would get tossed across the box by the saws. They should have had the hazards on some random sequence and not had some guy on the controls gunning for every bot the wandered by.

      BTW, I believe you can have large caliber projectile weapons, you just need to tether the projectile and reel it back in after firing.

    6. Re:Why? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      BTW, I believe you can have large caliber projectile weapons, you just need to tether the projectile and reel it back in after firing.

      Bingo, no auto cannons or high payload missiles allowed. :(

      (though the entire ring thing would have to be done away with, heh)

    7. Re:Why? by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I agree that it's become somewhat dull, but keep in mind that this recent (last few years?) wave of robot competition shows isn't the first. I remember watching Nova on PBS as a kid (err... well, maybe 10 years ago). My favorite ones were the robot competitions, only they generally weren't this one-on-one battle sort of situation. They'd have tasks to complete, and whichever did it best or fastest won. So they'd be building robots out of Legos and whatnot that would have to move ping pong balls from one box to another or fly magnetic discs over a net. I seem to remember them generally being autonomous, but I'm not sure. Anybody else remember these shows? (Heck, I'm sure some people here were involved directly in them!) Does this kind of thing still air anywhere?

      --
      Steven N. Severinghaus
  4. Shitty version of Robot Wars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as aired in the UK.

  5. Yeah by URoRRuRRR · · Score: 1

    But there's still a dozen shows like it.

    Also, what made it so funny that it was on COmedy central in the first place?

    --
    "Oh no, 3 horny women and only 2 condoms...Thank god I read slashdot"
    1. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, what made it so funny that it was on COmedy central in the first place?

      Duh, the bad comedian commentators who made bad jokes and horribly unfunny puns. Oh wait...

    2. Re:Yeah by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Your sig has got to be one of the best I've ever seen on this site. I mean that in all sincerity.

      Because I'm sure there's an "Ask Slashdot" with something like that queued up waiting to go.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    3. Re:Yeah by xintegerx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      His sig originates from the fact that there was a Puzzle web site that was featured here a month or two ago. One question asked,

      You have 2 condoms and 3 horney women waiting, how can you succeed and guarantee no STDs?

      The answer is:

      1) Put on both condoms
      2) Have sex with woman #1
      3) Remove top condom
      4) Have sex with woman #2
      5) put the outer condom back on, inverted, and have sex with woman #3

      Sure double condoms might break, but this works! Try it this weekend!

      Also, my SIG is pretty bad, too, Mr. Sig collector!

    4. Re:Yeah by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm confused.. when you put on Condom Number One (the outer condom) backwards to screw the third woman, wouldn't you be getting woman number 1's STD juice in your penis hole?

    5. Re:Yeah by URoRRuRRR · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Thanks. Yeah I get more responses on it than my comments.

      --
      "Oh no, 3 horny women and only 2 condoms...Thank god I read slashdot"
    6. Re:Yeah by Grab · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Not quite. Make it 1), 2), 3), 5), 3), 4) and you've got it.

      Grab.

    7. Re:Yeah by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      No. I am absolutely tootely correct. Re-read.

  6. Hopefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they will replace it with re-runs of "The New WKRP in Cincinatti." God, I swear, every time I see that show, I laugh myself sick.

    1. Re:Hopefully by gehrehmee · · Score: 2

      I'm root'n for Perfect Strangers personally.

      --
      "You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help" -- Calvin
    2. Re:Hopefully by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 1

      Cooozin Larrry?

      --
      If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  7. About time.. by ziggles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many times can you watch remote controlled scrap metal bump into each other and flip each other before it gets boring? For me.. it only took one episode. Not to mention the show has no business being on COMEDY central, since the only funny thing is watching the obviously fake "chemistry" between the hosts. Oh.. and whatshername's boobies are nice.

    1. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The premise (robots destroying each other) sounds cool, but the reality (robots unable to destroy each other, occasionally flip each other over) turns out to be boring. They need to mandate some sort of vulnerability for the robots, which the robots try to attack (and defend). All robots could be required to carry around a water ballon, or an egg, or something. Or all robots need to expose a self-destruct button.

    2. Re:About time.. by cwebster · · Score: 2

      If you want to see a vulnerable robot, find the robot wars episode featuring a bot named "tiger woods". As then name might suggest, the bot is made of wood, he makes it to the final fight, but the other bot literally turns him into splinters.

    3. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comedy Central may as well be called 'The South
      Park Channel', because Nothing Else on there is
      funny. I only pray they cancel Crank Yankers
      soon. The only thing I've seen from them that
      was worse was 'Strangers With Candy'. Normally,
      I can forgive an actor for playing a shitty
      part, but that lady on Strangers With Candy, man.
      I almost wish something bad would happen.
      Almost, but not quite. Now, for the show's
      Creators, well .. I wish them a long fall down
      a deep well.

    4. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe Battle Bots lasted this long. Not only was the action half-assed but they have like 10 people who do the hosting and reporting for it, yet out of ALL of those people, they can't come up with ANY compelling commentary or documentary info on the action or the builders.

      Bill Dywer is an idiot. So is his cohost. Then you have Carmen Electra, Donna Dierco and some other chick. Then you have Chris Rock and two other guys. And the most compelling thing they can think of is to have Carmen Electra say "hey so you won, huh?" or make some inane sexual inuendo.

      The only person with an IQ beyond two digits on that show is Bill Nye, and they give him like 10 seconds per show.

      Battle Bots is the MTV of technology.

      Wait... no.. Slashdot is the MTV of technology. Battle Bots is like the WWF of high tech.

    5. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jon Stewart's making fun of battlebots every night was more than enough reason to keep the show on the air.

    6. Re:About time.. by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      What they need to do is pick up the broadcast rights to the old Monty Python shows and MST 3000.

      Conan O'brian, while a rehash, is a nice addition.

      And please.. no more Ab-fab weekends.

    7. Re:About time.. by kawika · · Score: 1

      You guys are nutz. Battlebots is still an awesome show, the problem is that they only show three 3-minute battles per show and pad it with a bunch of shots of Carmen Electra's silicone implants. Get a Tivo and watch the darned thing that way! I can get through a 30 minute episode in about 10 minutes and not miss any of the destruction.

    8. Re:About time.. by nullgel · · Score: 1

      Goodness. I had to look at your name to make sure I hadn't typed your message in my sleep or something. I totally agree. Monty Python and especially MST3K episodes would be fantastic! And NO MORE Ab-fab marathons!!!

  8. Well by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2, Redundant

    The show wasn't really "funny". I mean, I never laughed. If anything wresting should be on comedy central. Now people pretending to hurt eachother while young rednecks actually believe that they are hurting eachother - That's comedy!

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because with the proper training getting slammed on the concrete floor from 8-10 feet up only feels like a simple bug bite.

    2. Re:Well by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe some folks could take that type of ruffin and it wouldn't hurt none, but when rock was chained into the ambulance and got ran over by hogans tractor trailer rig... now that son, is gettin clowned on.

    3. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so fucking gay.

  9. sport? by silicongodcom · · Score: 1

    sorry for the troll, but how is this a sport?

    dont get me wrong, i love it and watch it all the time, but sport? sigh..

    1. Re:sport? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is it not a sport?

      Preplanning and design combined with real time action and on your feet dynamic thinking.

      Sounds like a sport to me.

      Assloads more entertaining then that garbage that is (american)football. Yueck. Rules rules rules more time-outs then you can shake a stick at, they spend more time waiting to play then actually playing, yeick. Not to mention all that woosy ass protective gear, WTF is up with that shit? Want to make football a worthwhile watch, get rid of all of that penalty shit and just give them some leather helmets and some basic elbow/shin/knee guards and a jockstrap and throw'em on the field. Tell them to get the ball to the opponents end of the field, and let them loose. No freakin penalties, no freakin fouls, and unless somebody goes unconscious NO FREAKING STOPPING THE GAME .

      Now that'd be a sport worth watching.

      But until the, erhuhrm, humanitarian issues, are worked out, battle bots is the next best thing you are going to get to raw destruction in a sports arena. (well aside from Ultimate Fighting, but wasn't that canceled awhile back? Not to mention that it is pay per view any ways, bleh)

    2. Re:sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just because American football sucks doesn't mean anything more interesting than it is a sport.

    3. Re:sport? by robson · · Score: 2

      sorry for the troll, but how is this a sport?

      Do we really need to be so stingy with our definition of "sport"? It seems like we should allow our broad categories ("sports", "art") to be as inclusive as possible, and then get more specific after that ("dull, lifeless sport")...

    4. Re:sport? by cpeterso · · Score: 1

      Want to make football a worthwhile watch, get rid of all of that penalty shit and just give them some leather helmets and some basic elbow/shin/knee guards and a jockstrap and throw'em on the field. Tell them to get the ball to the opponents end of the field, and let them loose.

      You mean soccer?

      btw, your poetry URL is misspelled. "Writing" only has one T.

    5. Re:sport? by Brandeissansoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, ufc was not cancelled. The next UFC is on the 27th of september http://www.mma.tv/events/EventDetail.cfm?EID=397 UFC may be getting an additional boost later this year. There has been some talk of FOX buying the UFC(a couple months ago a few matches were shown on The Best Damn Sports Show Period).

    6. Re:sport? by schon · · Score: 1

      How is it not a sport?

      Do the players sweat?

      No?

      It's not a sport.

      Preplanning and design combined with real time action and on your feet dynamic thinking.

      That doesn't make it a sport.

      If the participants don't exert themselves physically, it's not a sport, it's a game.

      Figure skating is a sport.

      Golf is a game.

      Football (American and the real kind) is a sport.

      Baseball is a game.

      Battlebot participants don't exert themselves physically, so it's not a sport.

    7. Re:sport? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Baseball is a game.

      whaaaat? Even by your rather silly and arbitrary definiton, baseeball is a sport.

      You get your ass up on the mound and pitch 6 or 7 innings and see if your sweating or not.

      By your definiton, a person pounding their head against a wll is participatig in a "sport".

    8. Re:sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. You can't read (or understand) English.
      2. Your renderings are terrible.
      3. Get a life and live it, loser.

    9. Re:sport? by CormacJ · · Score: 2
      Want to make football a worthwhile watch, get rid of all of that penalty shit and just give them some leather helmets and some basic elbow/shin/knee guards and a jockstrap and throw'em on the field. Tell them to get the ball to the opponents end of the field, and let them loose. No freakin penalties, no freakin fouls, and unless somebody goes unconscious NO FREAKING STOPPING THE GAME .

      Now that'd be a sport worth watching.

      You've just about described Australian Rules Football. Definetly worth watching if you can find it on cable

    10. Re:sport? by daddymac · · Score: 1
      Battlebot participants don't exert themselves physically, so it's not a sport.
      Not So! You think those radio controllers don't take a little muscle to manuever? You are grossly mistaken, my friend.

      In the off season any good Battle-Botter can be seen working out their thumb muscles with the aid of (insert name of latest high tech video game console here).

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    11. Re:sport? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "Figure skating is a sport."

      no, its a contest.
      Ice hockey is a sport.

      you need two teams in a playing area at the same time.
      a team must be able to(legally) activly defend against the opposing team.
      It must require hard physically excertion.

      Swimming laps, contest, not a sport.
      Water polo, sport.

      track and field, all contests.

      Football(either one) is a sport.
      baseball, while it is still the only game where the defenders control the ball, is a sport
      basketball is a sport.

      Volleyball, a contest.
      Archery is a contest.

      to romote control vehicals smashing into each other, not a sport.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:sport? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Volleyball, a contest.

      Volleyball has two teams defending against each other, that is definately a sport.

    13. Re:sport? by 1nsane0ne · · Score: 1

      His definition said they had to be in the same playing area at the same time, so by his way of thinking it's not. However any "contest" where a cameraman can get fired for zooming in on college chicks asses (said he was trying to read their plays they give by their hands behind their back) is a ok by me.

    14. Re:sport? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      well, if he is handing exemptions to baseball, then I think volleyball qualifies.

    15. Re:sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like rugby... oh wait, what's the difference again? more goal posts? :-P

    16. Re:sport? by garethwi · · Score: 1

      I think he means Rugby, which is rather like american football, but without the girls clothes and coffee breaks.

  10. WOOHOO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's off Comedy Central! Yes, finally. Now, maybe they can put some COMEDY on.

    Maybe FX will pick it up, they seem to have lots of fighting there... TNN already has it's own robot show, so they're probably out.

  11. Comedy Centeral.. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never understood why it was ever on Comedy Central to begin with.. should have been on TechTV or The Learning Channel or some such.

  12. i've seen this coming. by edrugtrader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i'm a loyal battlebots viewer.... but with the advent of 3-4 other 'bot' fighting shows, someone had to die.

    battlebots is RAW, its just the bots out there with some minimal hazzards. you look at other shows like robot wars, and each individual bot makes little difference to who wins. there are like 5 huge 'house bots', and all you have to do to win is watch the house bot push the other guy in the pit. lame. shows like robotica are just glorified RC cars that race around. lame.

    battlebots did everything right, no compaints here at all. i'll be watching the re-runs after back to back to back SNL marathons i'm sure.

    on a side note, be sure to check out the new season of INSOMNIAC on comedy central, its fucking hilarious.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:i've seen this coming. by Gekko · · Score: 2, Informative

      With the advent???? Robot Wars was around well before battle bots.

      --
      I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
    2. Re:i've seen this coming. by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      How much was that check from Larry Diveny for?

    3. Re:i've seen this coming. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2

      Eh? The house robots only act if the bots go into the house robot's zone or if a bot is disabled.

      The idea is to allow more inovative robots that can disable rather than outright destroy, such as flippers or robots that can push the opponent into the house robots. Just having robots with either a big axe or a big disc could easily get boring.

      Still, my friend on the Storm team will be disappointed, he wanted to get into Battlebots because they pay a lot better than Robot Wars.

    4. Re:i've seen this coming. by Randatola · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The "rawness" of this entertainment is what is so compelling, I think. It is pure brutality waged by machines. If it were people being this brutal with each other, everybody would watch it too if they could (don't deny it). Battlebots to me has all the brutal appeal of, for example, Ultimate Fighting Championship, but without the social complications. Advertisers have no problem with it- in my market, there are always ads for Christian music albums during the show...never understood those demographics.

      I also agree that the other Battlebots imitators (and I don't care who "really" was first, Battlebots was the first one anybody knew about) are unwatchably lame.

      Although, there are too many hazards in Battlebots. They are too much of a factor in the fights. Too many fights are decided because somebody accidentally drives over a hazard, which is unavoidable because there are so many all over the place. Get rid of the spinners, the pistons, the spikes in the floor, and the lifting panels in the center. They just break up the flow of the action too much. They should just have the hammers and a couple sets of saws, and of course the spike strips on the sides, and let the robots fight. And please, make the hammers and saws sensor operated so that the jackass hammer nazi doesn't get to pick and choose who gets smashed. That's ridiculous.

    5. Re:i've seen this coming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battlebots is DUMB. Robot wars is friggin' cool. Stuff it!

  13. and good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice concept but the WWF feel made it unwatchable for me.

  14. As a genre by cryptogryphon · · Score: 2

    It's alive and kicking.

  15. Re:GOOD! by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    I admit I never watched BattleBots. But I would have watched it if the show featured real live people wearing battlebot armor beating the crap out of each other. Something along the lines of the hydralic lifter suit Sigorney Weaver wore in Aliens. It would be challenging for the contestants to figure out what bodypart to 'enhance' with robotic technology, assuming that a full-body suit wouldn't be practical (do you turbo charge your shoulders, arms, torso or legs?). And controlling the suit while moving your own body would probably require some fancy physical skills. But just watching a couple of machines fight isn't too exciting to me. Who cares who wins or loses?

    God willing, another network will pick it up and keep this sport alive!"

    I assume this is a joke. BattleBots may be entertainment but it's no more a sport than playing a videogame.

    GMD

  16. coolio by sixdotoh · · Score: 2, Informative

    wasn't it getting kind of old anyway? check out http://www.bestinc.org for some real robot stuff.

    --

    This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

  17. I can see why by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I stopped watching Battlebots after season 2. It just wasn't compelling TV. Most of the matches were like watching drunk boxing--A lot of swinging, but little contact. What I think needs to happen is for them to approach it from a whole other angle. The bots must be independent.

    Independent bots would force the bot makers to build navigation systems (to avoid the hazards), target acquisition systems (to find the other bots), decision making (push the bot toward the hazard, or try to flip, or run away and hide until my buzz saw starts working again?).

    Additionally, they should build a better arena and allow all those weapons currently outlawed, like EMP weapons, chemical, flamethrowers, magnetic grapples, swarms of multi-bots, etc. Should be much more exciting.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:I can see why by ocie · · Score: 2

      Another idea I saw on either battle bots or a simmilar show is to have different tasks to be accomplished. If the objective is just to pummel the crap out of the other bot, it gets a bit boring. If you have another task (collect balls, hit targets, etc) then designers have to build to pweform that task, and then any pummeling is just a happy side effect.

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    2. Re:I can see why by edrugtrader · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... if you think it looks like drunk boxing when the human is controlling it directly, what do you think it will look like when the human writes a system that attempts to do exactlly what it would do if a human was controlling it directly?

      MUCH MUCH less compelling.

      allow EMP = biggest EMP always win, and TV coverage is impossible.

      chemical = are we to expect the humans will go back into the ring to pick up their bot after it is sprayed with acid?

      flamethrowers i don't have a problem with, just not real exciting.

      i'll just stop there... but i really feel strongly about this, there is a give and take, and the current rules make for good fights. the second someone has a 30 foot flamethrower/EMP, and can beat any bot in 10 seconds, the show is over, and its all about ratings.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    3. Re:I can see why by gnovos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i'll just stop there... but i really feel strongly about this, there is a give and take, and the current rules make for good fights. the second someone has a 30 foot flamethrower/EMP, and can beat any bot in 10 seconds, the show is over, and its all about ratings.

      It can't beat the tiny bot that has magnetic feet (for sticking onto the bigger bot) and a old fashioned power drill (for drilling into it's head...). Creativity would make the show interesting when the rules are throw out the window.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    4. Re:I can see why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, you couldn't make emp legal, that is just cheap, though a swarming thing would be cool:)

    5. Re:I can see why by Exiler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Erm? Making them self contained is going to help with the little contact... how? Seriously, have you ever played one of those "robot programming games?" Most of the demos that come with them and everything I saw online was just pretty much a triangle spinning in circles shooting, no matter how much candy you put in the code.

      --
      Banaaaana!
    6. Re:I can see why by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      That would be "Robotica" on TLC.

      See http://tlc.discovery.com/fansites/robotica/robotic a.html

    7. Re:I can see why by unicron · · Score: 2

      Swarming? Like what? The bees? Or the dogs? Or the dogs with the bees in their mouth and when they bark they shoots bees at you?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    8. Re:I can see why by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

      "Additionally, they should build a better arena and allow all those weapons currently outlawed, like EMP weapons, chemical, flamethrowers, magnetic grapples, swarms of multi-bots, etc. Should be much more exciting."

      Absolutely! In the beginning it was so much fun because no one knew what to expect. Now, 6 years after the "first" organized 'bot matches, people have rooms full of research and development and scouting reports on other 'bots.

      I think they should introduce new weapons to livin' up the competition. Less restriction, more destruction. :)

    9. Re:I can see why by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      And once these robots are perfected, the Army will swoop in and make it the Armored Vehicle Combat Control System (ARVECOMCOSYS) to be deployed on the latest and greatest Abrahms-Huey Heavy Combat Airborne Platform (see terminator 2 for live screenshot)

      And then, buybye saddam.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    10. Re:I can see why by drainbamage · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. One of the problems was that they saturated the market. I think the show was in for trouble when Jay Leno started to have some of the builders on the Tonight show. The final deathblow was when they started selling the lame action figures. (My niece who thinks the show is cool even thought the action figures where "stupid") The second was they didn't make any attempts to mess with the formula.It was cool when the show was almost in an underground status but when it got popular and had the chance to be more innovative they just relied on the formula. Changing the battlehazards is not being innovative. Third their casting person needs to be shot. How many times did they change their T&A. Most of the time the women looked like they didn't want to be there.

      --
      The bank called.....your reality check bounced again
    11. Re:I can see why by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      > I stopped watching Battlebots after season 2.

      That's too bad, you missed some of the great matches. Say like Vlad the Impaler getting CUT IN HALF by Mechavore. Or Nightmare, both giving hits as well as getting smashed to pieces.

      Granted, the addition of Carmen "I got boobs" Electra has certainly made the SHOW a farce, but Battlebots is NOT a show. It's an event that Comedy Central covers, just like Monday Night Football.

      The weapons restrictions serve two purposes. One, they make it safe enough to do with spectators (I was at Vegas 2000, the show is NOTHING compared to being there). Two, with unrestricted weapons it would quickly become a contest of money, not design.

      Finally, you were trying to say 'autonomous' bots. Check your local dictionary, remotely controlled devices fall under the definition of robot.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    12. Re:I can see why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "swarms of multi-bots"

      Actually, I am part of a multi-bot team called The Swarm that has fought in the last 3 Battlebots tournaments.

      Having seen autonomous bot battles, and built both autonomous and radio-controlled bots, you are totally wrong about everything you said above.

      Autonomous bots would only exacerbate the "drunken boxing". You think that forcing the builders to build autonomous bots would lead to MORE contact and destructo? Please. Feel free to build an autonomous bot and meet me in a parking lot and we'll see who's bot gets more hits in.

      Magnetic grapples are already allowed. However, they are more or less useless, since most people build out of non-ferrous materials like aluminum and titanium, for weight reasons.

      EMP weapons would be horribly boring. Match starts, EMP weapon fires (invisibly) and one bot stops moving. Whoopdy doo.

  18. Self-controlled would be cool (Re:GOOD!) by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I did enjoy the technical aspect of the show. Making a working battlebot would require some ingenuity and skill, and it was cool to see what people came up with.

    However, I must definately agree that a self-contained/controlled bot would be way-cool. Perhaps using one of the mini-ITX boards/setups mentioned previously on slashdot, you could build some decent bot AI. If the bot needed to be controlled remotely, a wireless ethernet card would work.

    Anyone on slashdot want to take a shot at a mini-ITX project that makes an AI battlebot?

    No T-800's please... killing audience members is frowned upon

    1. Re:Self-controlled would be cool (Re:GOOD!) by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      I watch it once in a while, but some of the copycat shows are better. I tuned in last night and half of it was soft porn. It was ridiculous. Carmen Electra was was in a trashy teacher's uniform in a school room lecturing schoolboys. Porn has its place, but comedy central is not it. I'm glad to see it go. I figured they were getting desperate for viewers. Sex sells, but they're going way to far with it.

      On the topic of the bots, I too would love to see more originality. Half the bots were some form of wedge. Why take to time to build the bot if its going to be just like everyone else's? Once in a while you see some good ideas, but it's rare.

      I say make them AI controlled, put the ring in the middle of nowhere, get rid of the safety rules, and run until one is no longer mobile and/or capable of attacking.

    2. Re:Self-controlled would be cool (Re:GOOD!) by stickyc · · Score: 1

      However, I must definately agree that a self-contained/controlled bot would be way-cool.

      Many moons ago (before Comedy Central picked it up), we went to a Robot Wars in S.F. where they had an atonomous bot battle. The bots used pylons with IR xmitters/recievers to locate eachother. It was slow, painful, and boring as hell. The bots couldnt move quickly because they'd lose eachother and several of them just couldn't deal with the IR noise (reflections from the plexiglass, etc.) and sat and stuttered. I dont remember any of the bots even landing a single punch.

      Maybe nowadays, portable processing power would be enough to make something like this interesting to more than just comp-sci majors sussing out the AI routines.

  19. boring anyhow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I didn't think much of battlebots anyhow. Most of the contestants are basically radio control cars with some simple weapon (sawblade, flipper) tacked on.

    And most of the best performing bots were all of the same design anyhow... try and keep anything from getting under your bot, and try to flip over other bots.

    The concept is neat, but this show got really boring really fast. Not much innovation going on.

    1. Re:boring anyhow by iamblades · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think there is some good innovation in this years battlebots.

      Check out Warhead for example. That thing is badass looking (and killing).

      I don't think it fit on CC, but there should be a place for it, and it's certainly better than any of the other crappy robot shows. I think the announcers are the worst parts of most of these shows, and so far, Battlebots has had the best.

      I think it's time for some variation in arenas in battlebots, and maybe some loosening of rules. Maybe having seperate arenas for the different weight classes would make the smaller fights less hazard dependant and last longer.

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
  20. In other news: by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every original program on basic cable with no connection to psychics is to be cancelled.

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    1. Re:In other news: by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

      Isn't that the truth?! Maybe I'm just odd, but the cable networks keep cancelling shows I like, and then they turn to publishing other dreck that I can't stand.

      *argh*

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  21. Mentioned on TiVo Community in May by abischof · · Score: 2

    Hmm, there was talk about this on TiVo Community (a TiVo forum) back in May. But, from that thread, it looks like the plan might be just to move BattleBots to another network (or so I would hope).

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

    1. Re:Mentioned on TiVo Community in May by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I wish I were hiring. You have excellent design skills, very impressive work. Good luck, I would think you would have no trouble attracting job offers. Have you considered starting your own business?

    2. Re:Mentioned on TiVo Community in May by abischof · · Score: 1

      It has crossed my mind that I could start my own business, though I'm hesitant to try it in this economy. So, at the moment, I'm looking for an ordinary full-time position.

      And, just to clarify, I'm not actually a web designer. I typically work alongside a designer and, from his or her comps (resembling a screenshot), I generate the appropriate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

  22. BattleBots/RobotWars by T-Kir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even though I never watched BattleBots, I watch Robot Wars in England. I'd have though BattleBots would be more suitable on Discovery or TLC rather than Comedy Central (like Junkyard Wars/Scrapheap Challenge)?

    I'd think that it should have a chance of being picked up by another network, because a series like this that sparks innovation and interest in construction is better for Joe Public rather than Big Brother X (despite the 'socialology' aspect of it), The Mole, etc.

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there still a British taping of this show? It used to be on PBS here in the US, but they've taken it off the air, afaik. Philippa Forrester was so fine.

    2. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      In Canada we have the best of all worlds.

      We get the British Robot Wars on 'Space' (our equivalent to the Sci-Fi Channel), we get the WWE Robot Wars on TNN, and Battlebots on Discovery. TLC also runs both the British and US Junkyard Wars.

      I always wondered if there were more than one "Sir Killalot". Kinda tough to ship him back and forth from London to wherever they film the US Robot Wars.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by T-Kir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      After seeing the US version of Robot Wars, it is the actual UK version but lacking some of the behind the scenes stuff (I think) and with a different presenter (Craig Charles presents it in the UK - he played 'Lister' in Red Dwarf).

      This is 'cos the BBC licences it to different countries (a bit like the TellyTubbies) so they get the original tapes for them to reproduce their own versions, whereas Junkyard/Scrapheap has the same co-presenter (who is also the exec producer) and they do a combination of UK/US filming.

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    4. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Tassleman · · Score: 1

      Off-topic and strictly FYI, I don't believe WWE runs Robot Wars. Mick Foley hosts it, but he no longer works for WWE.

    5. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      I think the first season (or first half) in the US was just replays of the British Wars, but the second half was all new stuff. Different rules too. It was a free for all: Put 6 robots in the ring and let them go 5 rounds until only 1 survives. Elimination by destruction or disability.

      First time I saw the 'Ref Bot'. Was kinda cool too, seeing 3 or 4 robots gang up on who they thought would be the toughest competition.

      I get a laugh out of Craig Charles. Funnier that the guy they had on the first season.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    6. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 1

      Actually, The Mole has some pretty darn good game design. Of course, it was the one sporting the worst ratings and got canned (or at least not renewed).

      There's no accounting for taste....

    7. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      I don't know rasslin' that well, but the way Robot Wars is presented on TNN, I still expect robots to have their own theme song :-)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    8. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      After seeing the US version of Robot Wars, it is the actual UK version but lacking some of the behind the scenes stuff (I think) and with a different presenter (Craig Charles presents it in the UK - he played 'Lister' in Red Dwarf).

      A shame they change the host, I'd love to see Craig Charles do it (I'm watching Red Dwarf right now). Unfortunately Cathy Roger has left hosting Junkyard Wars in the US, leaving us with two American hosts... it's just not the same without a Brit.

    9. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by brain159 · · Score: 2

      That was Jeremy Clarkson - motoring journalist and crushing bore. Craig Charles is a much more suitable presenter for it as he can inject the kind of neon-lit manic enthusiasm that the Robot Wars format demands.

    10. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I know is that I want to bang that short haired british bitch on junkyard wars in the worst way.

    11. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Ankou · · Score: 1

      Well Discovery channel or TLC (cant remember which) did have a robot competition show. Only this one was competition between robots underwater. In the episode i saw they had the Navy and some other professionals who designed underwater salvage robots (modified of course to fight) against these highschoolers. They had weapons from buzz saws to underwater welders. The beginning of the show started with a series of manuverability competitions and speed races, and the final competition was to destroy each other and have one sink to the bottom of a 60 foot pit under the water. Pretty kewl stuff, much more unpredictable and interesting to see than robots on a modified rollerskate rink. Please someone help me out with the name of this show its going to drive me crazy!

    12. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by koogydelbbog · · Score: 1

      >Unfortunately Cathy Rogers has left hosting Junkyard Wars in the US

      in the UK too. new season (starts Sunday 15th) has Lisa Rogers (no relation). i hope they get away from the 'build a vehicle and race it' thing this series - i always prefered the catapults and demolition machines.

      bring back the Great Egg Race 8)

      andy

    13. Re:BattleBots/RobotWars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK Robot Wars had 6 bot elimination matches as filler for regular tournament, before US series had started.

  23. No complaints here by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I don't know who's fault it is, but the battle bots were pretty lowsy.

    Some fall apart with the first hit, so many just get flipped over, and what's worse is the hazards in the arena. They at least should have had the saws and everything else on timers, so it would be reasonably fair.

    What would have been better is a course with no hazards, and no time limit. Then the wimpy pushing and shoving bots wouldn't have fared so well. Someone could just make a bot that moves fast, and have the opponent kill himself by hitting the hazards that you can avoid.

    When they make some decent changes to it, I'll start watching again. Until then, season 1 was my first and last.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:No complaints here by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Well, having 6 minutes of battle and 16 minutes of filler was a big part of why it sucked.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:No complaints here by PD · · Score: 2

      Having a TiVo was the main reason why it was great to watch. I'd watch the fights and only the fights, whole thing done in 10 minutes.

  24. v2 by PW2 · · Score: 1

    If they ever continue, it may be more fun to watch if CC provided the same mechanical parts to each team; this could occasionally prevent simple armored RC cars (boring) from being used; WIFI and more complex semi-autonomous things would be more fun to watch too;

  25. coincidence.. guess they will have to wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny coincidence since I just got this email today from the MIT EECS mailing list

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Anne Hunter [mailto:anneh@eecs.mit.edu]
    Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:47 PM
    To: jobslist@altoids.mit.edu
    Subject: MIT BATTLEBOTS Info Session Tomorrow!

    Do you love designing and building your own robots?
    Are you looking for an exciting senior thesis?
    Do you want a chance to build your own robot-dominating machine?

    Then MIT BATTLEBOTS needs you! In preparation for the upcoming Battlebots
    (tm) season, MIT BATTLEBOTS is looking for active people to design and build
    the next wave of robots! If you're interested in working on this amazing
    project, please join us for an informational session:

    MIT BATTLEBOTS info session
    "Meet General Gau"
    Thursday, Sept. 12, 2002
    6:00pm
    Room 4-402

    For more information, visit http://web.mit.edu/edgerton/battlebots/index.html
    Freshmen through seniors are welcome. Feel free to circulate this message.

  26. The sport's not dead by infornogr · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, there were lots of rip-offs of the battlebots concept, with varying degrees of quality. Unless all of these have died out without my noticing, and Battlebots is the last one, It seems like robot-smashing will be around for a bit longer.
    Of course, these too will eventually die off if they haven't done so already. To me, Battlebots was a novelty thing. It's interesting the first few times, but after a while the effect wears off. Maybe it's different if you're a follower and you know all the robots and root for the ones you like, but all the best designs have been copied up the wazoo, which really runis it for me. Half the fun at first was saying "Ooh. That's a clever idea." Once that wears off, it's just a bunch of the same old wedges and blades fighting with annoying announcers, and the occaisional gimmick to help add variety and attract interst (supermodels, Bill Nye, "multi-bots", etc.) I for one won't be greatly missing the show, but it's still a mildly entertaining way to deal with insomnia.

  27. I'm not so surprised... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    The problem with Battlebots is that it never really grows. It might help if the competitions were geared such that certain familliar bots fight more often. Like a celebrity bot. (Anybody remember Jay Leno's bot? heh)

    I don't have any immediate ideas how they could easily incorporate that into their current system. Maybe they could have teams of bots?

  28. A sad day for robot sports indeed by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    I think this has been a long time coming, the fighting has to stop.

  29. You know what ultimatly killed this wonderful show by WndrBr3d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These cheap TNN and TNT rip-off shows where people slap a cooking pot on top of an RC car and race around a rat maze with flame-throwers scorching their tires.

    Hosts, which are more than drunken, overweight ex-NASCAR commentators looking to pay for their recently upgraded mobile home.

    It sickens me to see all these cheap K-Mart quality knock-off shows, which cheapen such RAD programming such as BattleBots.

    This kinda crap happens with -EVERY- form of popular TV entertainment. Look at Reality TV for fucks sake. First it was Survivor, -HUGE- hit. Then came Big Brother, Temptation Island, Fear Factor, Worst Case Scenario and a slew of other knock-offs, which have watered down and sucked all the fun out of reality TV.

    I guess basically it all boils down to me being pissed off my TiVo will no longer have robots ripping the crap out of one another. :-D

  30. Junkyard Wars by Nobley · · Score: 1

    Junkyard Wars (aka scrapheap) is a much more entertaining series in the mechanical sport genre in my opinion, it has room for varity in the different channelges they get given and the like, I wouldnt mind seeing a corperate robot wars style program however, such a Fuji made robot Vs a Sony one and so on,.. That would be pretty cool.

  31. This is why! by codepunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Too many weapons restrictions

    2. Carmen should never be allowed to say anything

    3. Get rid of the WWF spin crap and treat it like a nascar event.

    4. Battlebots started making corporate deals poisioning the rules further by restricting equipment.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:This is why! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      You are so freaking correct it pains me.

      No missiles or projectiles?

      No EMP weapons?

      I take more chances mowing my lawn!

      Really- those 'robot' (remote controled thingys are not robots) 'battle' (if crap isn't blowing up or burning and there's no danger of any kind to any thing it's not a battle or war) pretty much suck. I'm dead serious.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:This is why! by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 1

      2. Carmen should never be allowed to say anything

      ITYM "Carmen should never be allowed to wear anything....

      HTH. HAND.

    3. Re:This is why! by stickyc · · Score: 1

      No missiles or projectiles?
      Just a slight risk to the audience.. Then again, limit the range/power used.. Or have unlimited class out in the desert with the audience bunker miles away.

      No EMP weapons?
      How much fun would that be? "3-2-1.... Both bots appear to be dead..."

      I take more chances mowing my lawn!
      But if the mower were controlled by someone else and your lawn were a giant locked box...

      Now that would get ratings!

    4. Re:This is why! by swoopx · · Score: 1

      forget one?

      5. restrictor plates.

    5. Re:This is why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh - turning left shouldnt be a sport. Now Rally Racing - Thats a sport

    6. Re:This is why! by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      Oh great. How are the bots supposed to pass each other?

  32. Yeah, battlebots by machine+of+god · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always thought that battlebots was kind of dumb. I mean, at first it was interesting because it was new, but after it's newness wore off, it got very boring. Most people won by flipping their opponent over. I could enter a hampster in a ball and stand a chance. (Mutated, ill-tempered hampster, of course).

    All I'm saying is there really was no battle. It ought to have been last robot to move, or until surrender. I mean, where were the hydraulic crushers, or the high power lasers. Or anything really. Something that can be damaged by a good kick doesn't deserve to be called a battle bot.

    1. Re:Yeah, battlebots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mutated, ill-tempered hampster, of course with FRICKIN' LASER BEAMS attached to its head

  33. Re:GOOD! by puff-d-dwaggie · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why go miniITX? How about use a bot system thats already out there. Lego Mindstorms Robotics has a fully funcitonal robotic controller and pieces parts ready to go. I have built my own bots to battle against each other with mindstorms and have had fun with it but cant find anybody else around my area who does lego robots. I have, however, seen mention on the internet about lego bot contests.

    "Get Moose and Squirrel!"

  34. The show was cool but... by Squeezer · · Score: 1

    the rules they had for what your bot could and could not do really limited what sort of bot you could build. That is why you mostly had wedges, spinners, lifters, spikers, and one capture bot.

    It would of been cooler if it was like on Robot Wars (does anyone even watch that? the announcer sucks) but they have pits with fire, and their bots hav emore flexability as to what weapons they can use.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:The show was cool but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minor point: The announcer in the US version is different from the UK version. The UK version had (has?) Craig Charles (Lister / Red Dwarf).

      Makes for a far more enjoyable watch.

  35. bring back "That's My Bush!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or one of these days, i'm gonna punch you in the face!

    1. Re:bring back "That's My Bush!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      odd that one got knocked off immediately after 9/11. Well, not so odd. Just a bad time to make fun of the president, I guess.

      It was a pretty good show, though. I always expected to see it come back after the average American got sick of patriotism. (Which was by about 9/18)

  36. What about... by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about Junkyard Wars? I believe that TLC really did something original with that.

    Also, didn't TNN's Robot Wars come out before battlebots? I remember when battlebots first came out, the first ad I saw for them was during watching Robot Wars on TNN. I could just be mistaken and it was an ad for a new season of Battlebots and I hadn't cared.

    Still, It is a shame that they are canceling battlebots. Not to be a troll, The only thing I didn't like about it is comedy central put that dumb carmen electra slut on there for sex appeal. Why couldn't they have put some prety girl on there who actually knew something about electronics.

    --
    Erutangis ym si siht.
    1. Re:What about... by puff-d-dwaggie · · Score: 0

      JUNKYARD WARS?!?! Oh My GLUB. That is as fakey and presetup as pro wrestling. Lets turn them free in a real junkyard, not one where all the pieces are laid out for them and the group leaders already know what they are going to build and out of what before the show starts. Sheesh.

      "Get Moose and Squirrel!"

    2. Re:What about... by subuni · · Score: 2, Informative

      Junkyard Wars isn't an original TLC creation. It was originally a British show called 'Scrapheap Challenge'.

      And, TNN's Robot Wars did not come out before Battlebots. This was also originally a British show called 'Robot Wars'. All TNN did was take the British show and hire professional wrestlers to redub the announcing bits.

    3. Re:What about... by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 1

      I see said the blind man!
      I had a clue that they were british shows. I did not know however that TLC had just micr-shafted them (bought them out.) That's a good thing to know. Thanks, and if I could mod I would give you a +1 Informative.

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    4. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      BattleBots has it's first event in August 1999. It had 72 competitors, many of which were from the "old Robot Wars" events which finished in 1997.

      Robot Wars, that you see on TNN, started int he UK in 1997, as a spinoff to the US event. It was then, and still is, an invite only TV show, designed as a kids program, where matches are made as long as the producers want, pre-arranged judges decisions or rules clarifications were not unusual, and the house bots trash bots under the direction of the producers.

      The Robot Wars that were made for TNN were filmed in summer of 2001, initially, at the same time as a live show for the UK teams. This was about half way between series 3 and 4 of the Comedy central series (or events number 5 and 6 for Battlebots, having done two events before Comedy Central came along, one for ZDTV that was broadcast LIVE, and the other a PPV for direcTV that was aired around superbowl time in 2000). The second series was broadcst in January of this year.

      The only thing, in fact, that the current Robot Wars has to do with the origional events that took place 1994-1997, is the trademark.

      To address your second point, BattleBots has not been "cancelled" any more than Formula 1 was "cancelled" when the BBC did not renew it's contract a few years ago. The BattleBots event is run by BattleBots Inc. It is filmed by TallentWorks, and Edited/produced by first Productions, to be Presented on comedy central. TallentWorks also did the first two, pre-CC, events, so at most, the break is half-way up the chain. All that has changed, is that it will be televised on a different channel, probably with different presenters, in a different style.

      Pretty Girl? - I say Amy Sun for Bot-Babe!

  37. "sport", eh? by good.karma · · Score: 1
    God willing, another network will pick it up and keep this sport alive!"

    only on slashdot is something where you only have to move your thumbs a sport...

    --gk
    1. Re:"sport", eh? by georgewad · · Score: 1

      What about thumb wrestling? That's a sport.

      --
      Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
    2. Re:"sport", eh? by schon · · Score: 2

      if they can call mopping a floor a sport (curling) then they can call battlebots a sport!

      First of all: I don't know who 'they' are, but nobody I know considers curling to be a sport.

      Curling is a game.

      Secondly: curling isn't mopping, it's sweeping (brooms, not mops.)

      And thirdly: like golf, curling is a practical joke played by the Scottish on the rest of the world - the rest of the world just hasn't caught on yet.

  38. Good riddance by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0, Insightful
    It's a stupid show. Don't get me wrong, I love robots. These aren't those--these are RC vehicles. That's pretty boring, when you think about it. Would I rather see AI's doing battle, pitting intelligence and strategy vs intelligence and strategy with a smattering of loud sounds and cool weapons? Or would I rather see a high-tech version of Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robots?

    However, I would have been willing to endure the misnomer in the title for the chance to see the engineering and problem-solving involved. Except that the announcing...oh my dear god, the terrible announcing. There are several levels they could have chosen. Calm and relatively sedate (regular televised sports). Hyped and taking themselves seriously (like WWF). Hyped and not serious (Junkyard Wars). Instead, they chose hyped, not taking themselves seriously, but thinking they are the funniest thing on the planet. Of course, that's a Zappa for ya.

    1. Re:Good riddance by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      No, autonomy is not a part of the definition of robot.

      See http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=robot

      "2. A machine or device that operates automatically or by remote control."

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
  39. they brought it on themselves by jonathanbearak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i loved watching the robots fight, people losing thousands upon thousands of dollars as sparks flew up and metal launched across the "battlebox"

    but the commentary gets worse and worse. the last episode i saw, they nearly had carmen electra perform soft-core porn.

    i'm sure they did focus groups. but people in focus groups are going to see fire and say good and see the crap they aired and say good, just for the joke of it. there are some things that if you show them, even if they suck, people in certain age groups (even if they honestly don't like it) jokingly cheer.

    to recap:
    from an hour of deadly fighting ... to ...
    30 minutes of [you know what]

    give me back my chainsaws and my mental patients!!!

    and for god sakes, stop interviewing gary coldman!!!

    then i'll watch again.

    (since it seems relevant via demographics, i'm 15, male)

  40. Don't you mean the WWE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They haven't been WWF for quite some time now.

    Unless you meant the World Wildlife Foundation?

    1. Re:Don't you mean the WWE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if he thinks Battlebots has a WWF/E feel, he'd probably really hate Robot Wars on TNN.

  41. Sport? by pjdepasq · · Score: 2

    How is this a sport?

  42. you mean . . . by vizualizr · · Score: 1

    they aren't hurting each other?

    that just brought my whole worldview crashing down on me.

    --
    anything i tell you will cloud your opinion.
  43. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  44. Obviously, I am Bent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, I'm some sort of moron, because every time I start liking a show, it gets cancelled. Politically Incorrect, The Job, Dennis Miller Live, X-Files and now Battlebots. This REALLY sucks.

    1. Re:Obviously, I am Bent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek, Sea Quest DSV

  45. it just wasn't a good show.. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it actually took comedy central out of my rotation when 'scanning' for something to watch. Except for South Park at 10 wed., it was nothing but decade old SNL re-runs and BattleBots. I'd be more likely to find something entertaining on QVC.

    They weren't robotic, and hardly battled. They didn't have any 'weapons', anything interesting to see. Just oversized remote control cars smashing into each other.

    The concept of robots fighting each other with crazy weapons is good, the reality a la this show, was a bore.

    I saw something (didn't catch the beginning) on the Discovery Channel (?), which was a special that had two submarines 'battling' in a swimming pool. It was some university team vs. the naval academy. One of them had a 'boomstick' which used .22 cal shells to shatter things, the other had an oxygen torch. The "house bot" had big hydraulic pincers.

    The navy 'robot' was completely demolished. They didn't simply bonk into each other for 5 minutes. All their hard work was destroyed.

    That should have been how BattleBots worked. Rather than running around bonking into each other but having no actual damage happen.

    It just wasn't a very good show. Maybe ESPN2 will pick it up. I saw them run live coverage of a 'Magic: The Gathering' tourney.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  46. finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that pathetic show got old after about 2 episodes.

  47. Good riddence by the_machine · · Score: 1

    I'm all for remote controlled battles, but the only reason I watched that show was to see Donna and Carmen. (mmmmm....Carmennnnn.....)

    The "hazards" made me sick because it just seemed like there was some four year old pressing the button when the robot he didn't like got near one.

  48. The next step: Robots with no remote control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Battlebots show was getting a little stale. You had robots being designed just to beat a particular other one. Designs were converging on a few models. Carmen Elektra's sexual innuendos were getting tiring.

    The next step, I thought, was to to add some intelligence, not more titanium or hydraulics, to the robots and make them move and attack by themselves. Take the remote control away!

  49. fighting bots? better kill alive people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What could kids learn from the Bottle Bots show? At least something about hardware design. What can kids learn from WWF? Killing alive people is a very good business!

    That's the spirit of drunk America. Actually, no culture - no spirit. Period.

  50. Bittersweet... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    Part of me will miss it, that's the part that gets to watch 1/2 hour Battle Bots show in about 7-10 minutes... That 30 second skip button on the ReplayTV is very handy not just for the commercials, but to skip over all that WWF style announcing. I'm not knocking folks who like wrestling and such, but I don't think I would have the patience to sit through a whole 1/2 hour or 1 hour episode of the thing un-skipped.

    The show certainly shouldn't cost that much: from what I gather, they shoot the whole thing over the course of a single weekend and then add all taht announcy/interviewy stuff later. I'd love to see TLC or Discovrey Science pick it up without all the fluff. Show us all the matches farther back in the rankings so we can follow the "career" of the bots better.

    Too bad I don't get the original British Robot Wars on my local PBS station anymore...

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  51. my thoughts by cpex · · Score: 1

    personally I have only watched the show a couple times seems like the same thing over and over again. I agree with everyone else who said they need to be allowed more flexibility with weapons and should use AI to fight instead of RC. I think battlebots would be more intresting to watch if
    A) it was at a live event
    B) the bots were bigger
    C) More people like carmen electra announcing (hehe sexy women and robots blowing each other up... sweet)

    1. Re:my thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A) it was at a live event

      I live in San Francisco, and got to see it live. Live, it rocked. barely in control machines bounching off the bullet-proof plexi walls. More than once everyone ducked quick, thinking 'this is the time that that wall's gonna give'. Loud noises. Such fun.

      Trying to televise something like Battlebots would be like trying to televise a monster truck ralley or SRL show- half the effect is being there!

  52. Is it too much to ask? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    All I asked for was sharks with fricken laser beams on their heads.

  53. TechTV! by McSpew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If ever there was a network born to show BattleBots, it's TechTV. Something tells me the budgets wouldn't be as high, but that might be a good thing. There wouldn't be as much impetus to tart the show up so much just to draw in the viewers required to pay back the budget.

    Personally, I liked the original Robot Wars UK show the best. I did think the house robots had a little too much direct impact on the outcome, but I liked the concept of having qualifying rounds where the bots had to overcome challenges, followed by the individual combat rounds.

    Maybe what's needed is some new thinking, like team robot combat. Maybe a capture-the-flag sort of thing. You could have robots optimized for offense and defense, which might add some interesting twists to a show. The problem would be that the costs to assemble an entire team of robots would be drastically more than for an individual robot or two.

    1. Re:TechTV! by Xenolith · · Score: 1
      Yep, TechTV.

      I saw a BattleBot maker with his bot on The ScreenSavers. Gary Coleman of Diffr'nt Strokes fame was part of the Bot's team. A foreshadowing? I think so.

      --

      Journal
    2. Re:TechTV! by CBNobi · · Score: 2

      If TechTV picks it up, that would mean the end of them airing BBC's TechnoGames, which is basically just a collection of school projects made by elementary school students. Two birds with one stone.

      Then again, the female host is certainly appealing..

    3. Re:TechTV! by nexex · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but napster was created at Northeastern University in Boston...

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  54. Sorry to see it go. by Jamuraa · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While the genre might be contested over as to it's worth, this show was the best show in the genre. I have watched in vain the other robot shows and noone gives the same 'feel' as this one does. Mabye it's because they don't treat it like wrestling or like trick dog shows, but they actually attempt to make it SEEM more like a sport. That said, being the cream of the crop of a horrible crop isn't something that comedy central is going for. I am actually surprised, because they seemed to prominently advertise it for a while (at least when I had comedy central). Not that it got good ratings or anything.
    One thing that is missing from this show: a variety of weapons. The weapons shouldn't be limited, this just makes the teams stagnate with their wedge or flipper or spinner designs. The truly original bots just aren't seen anymore because they get beaten to shreds by the people who make the old, tired, (albeit successful) designs. I think allowing for more weapons will add variety to the field.

    We can only hope that ESPN picks this up.. then they'd have something to show on ESPN2 that's not jocks having a pissing contest.

    --
    You can't see this if you have sigs turned off.
    1. Re:Sorry to see it go. by zehn · · Score: 1

      I have noticed a real growth in the types of weapons over the years. It started out with wedges and flippers with a couple of saws and spinners but now you have a lot of hybrids and new forms of old weapons that are even more powerful. For example, what is considered a spinner now? Atomic War head with the spinning shield and moving "wings", Son of Wyachi with the heavy spinning hammers, Mechavore with the spinning disk, Mauler whith the entire outer shell spinning.

      I never thought a battle would be as exciting as watching Vlad and Biohazard. But watching some of the newer bots like Son of Wyachi take out Nightmare or even the finals with Biohazard changed my mind.

      The more successul a design the more other have to engineer around it. Flippers are now countered by self righting mechanism or even invertable bots. Flippers can't take out an bot in 1 flip any more so not spinners are becoming more common.

      I also thought I read about a bot that had a sensor in it that deployed the weapon when the other bot was in position. I think if Battlebots is picked up we will see more of that.

  55. I used to like it, but now ... Good Riddance! by nullgel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I liked the idea at first, but all the flashy crap started to turn me off. The silly metal music, idiot hosts, and stereotypical "hottie" girl talking to the awkward speaking robot builders was just starting to get on my nerves. If they had only done it more like Junkyard Wars I would have probably tuned in more often. Taking more time to get to the "tech" side of bot-building. But I guess geeks are too small of a crowd to cater to on TV right now.

    Besides, I can hardly call those things "robots." More like RC death machines. When I think of robots, I think of more autonomous machines with some built-in intelligence. To me that would have been way more intersting to watch. Although, I guess watching some poorly programmed bot drive along the side of the ring the entire match might get boring. Oh well. Something like that.

    TLC has a new show starting soon that may be intersting to see. With the original girl host from Junkyard Wars and, I think I saw him, Henry Rollins. I guess we'll see.

    1. Re:I used to like it, but now ... Good Riddance! by schon · · Score: 1

      TLC has a new show starting soon that may be intersting to see. With the original girl host from Junkyard Wars and, I think I saw him, Henry Rollins. I guess we'll see.

      That would be Full Metal Challenge!

      Some friends and I were discussing entering for this - some of the designs on the website were pretty cool, but nobody I know figured it would be an indoor event (which it looks like from the trailer I saw..)

      Yes, like Junkyard Wars, Cathy Rogers is producing/hosting this one as well (which explains why she's not hosting the current JW season.)

      And YES! Henry Rollins!

      When I saw Henry Rollins in the trailer, I thought - WOW - they really know how to pick a co-host..

  56. Re:You know what ultimatly killed this wonderful s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Brother came before Survivor. It was extremely popular in Germany (c. 1998-1999) and the US version was virtually identical to it. So your theory has holes.

  57. Toughman vs. BattleBots by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe FX will pick it up, they seem to have lots of fighting there...

    A Toughman-BattleBots crossover show would be cool to watch! Have 5 battlebots attacking some plumber or construction worker or something. While he's got his hands full with fighting one robot, two others are hammering away at his feet! So he bends over to pick up one of the machines when a third one shoves a corkscrew up his...

    Actually, now that I think about it, maybe this crossover show would be more suitable for Comedy Central...

    GMD

  58. Let's see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Project Spotlight ... Battlebots ... Project Spotlight ...

    I say put Denis Leary in the cage with a battle bot. The winner gets to have a time spot.

    BTW: Project Spotlight, the worst show ever.

    1. Re:Let's see by messiertom · · Score: 1

      I agree completely - it is a bad mockery (none of the events in it actually happened) of Project Greenlight. I would go as far as saying that Comedy Central's new shows suck - all I ever watch it for is the old SNL reruns and the Daily Show.

      Denis Leary shouldn't die though - his cancer (leukemeia?) charity is a huge success and he really deserves more commendation for that than he receives.

      P.S: You have the wrong name for it - it's Contest Searchlight, not Project Spotlight.

  59. Comedy Central Battles CancelBots?? by e7 · · Score: 2

    Wha .. If that's a joke, I don't get it.

    --
    Corollary to Moore's Law: The IQ of new computer owners is declining.
  60. Sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a typo, he meant spork.

    Besides, i prefer robocode.

  61. Finally! by Skeezix · · Score: 2

    I'm glad they canceled the show...It wasn't funny. I go to Comedy central for shows that are funny, like standup routines, southpark, the daily show. Battlebots just didn't belong.

  62. Please not on TLC... by OneFix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BattleBots does not belong on TLC ... they already tried it...it was called Robotica!!! But, what we should really be getting behind are the shows like Junkyard Wars.

    As I'm sure others will point out, these were generally nothing more than glorified remote controlled cars. The truly inovative bots were few and far between, and most of them were either designed as a "wedge" or a "flipper".

    I'm not saying that shows like this shouldn't exist or even that it doesn't take know-how to build them, it's just that most of the ideas have been done over-and-over again...anyhow, I'ld call 5 years a pretty good run for most any show...I mean how much longer can you really go until there's nothing new being done. I actually think we're there now, we just didn't realize it till now.

    You might get something as a Saturday Morning show on one of the networks, but I wouldn't count on it.

    Here's a question...why can't the contests continue without a TV Show? I mean, anything that I'ld actually term as a sport should be able to survive without prime-time television coverage. And if it honestly holds such a large "geek" audience, then companies like IBM, Dell, and Apple should be scrambling to sponsor events and bots...

    On a side note, I personally enjoyed the shows, but like most ppl thought it was out of place on CC.

    1. Re:Please not on TLC... by CvD · · Score: 1

      Skydiving survives pretty well as a sport, not to mention an industry making all the materials. It doesn't get much media attention, unfortunately, until something goes wrong, and then the media is suddenly whipped up into a frenzy... guess it's not much of a spectator sport. :-)

      Cheers...

  63. TNT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does n't TNT or TNN have a similar show that
    hosted by tha wff wresler

  64. same reason pulling a trigger is a sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explain how shooting is a sport. Pull trigger
    Speed walking a sport? walking
    Archery? pull string on a curved stick
    Hitting small white ball w/stick to make it go into 4 inch hole
    Running?

    Sport is defined by who can produce the best spin

  65. Sad but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is sad but on a personal note I'd like to rant for a minute...

    THIS IS NOT A SPORT!!!

    Nor is race car driving, ice skating, golf (yes I love it too), horse back riding or any number of other games competitions or whatever.

    To be a true sport...
    • you should have to compete directly against another person(s) or team(s) (notice the word "directly"?)
    • there has to be an objective measure of victory (that's right no French judges that have been bought off...this applies to boxing, too...it's only a sport when someone is knocked out)
    • you have to exert yourself physically (that's right chess isn't a sport nor is EQ)
    • you have to be able to be injured in the normal course of play not as some freak accident.
    • the athlete has to be you (not a horse, dog, robot, or blow up doll)
    • ideally there should be an object to struggle over such as a ball, puck or some such but this one has been waved by my brother-in-law who pointed out that boxing doesn't have this and boxing is definitely a sport as long as it doesn't go to the judges...that should be considered a draw if no one goes unconcious.

      These other things can be games, competitions, whatever but they aren't sprots.

      Some examples to help you...

      American football, soccer, baseball, basketball, hockey, boxing, tennis, and even fencing are sports, as well as many others.

      Golf (again I love to play but it's not a sport), auto racing, horseback riding, ice skating, ice dancing, and gymnastics while all very difficult and enjoyable in there own way, are not sports.

      END RANT...

      You didn't know someone could get so worked up about something so stupid did you? Oh, what am I say you guys are part of the Free Software Community, of course you knew that. BTW, Linux advocacy...not a sport.
    1. Re:Sad but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Track and field is exempted from the direct competition rule due to the historical nature of these types of games and the fact that they gave rise to all other sports. But the foot racing portion of it is more sport than the others due to direct competition. =)

      -Anonymous Coward Author of the Above Rant

  66. Didn't like BattleBots.. by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 2

    I never really liked BattleBots.. The hosts of the show were way too cardboard-ish (or football-ish, or something) for my tastes. I've enjoyed TNN's Robot Wars much more, even though it's hosted by an ex-wrestler (so I'm told.. I was never into wrestling, so I don't know). Even with what TNN has done, I think it could be much more entertaining.

    Somehow, it just seems like this is a sport by and for regular people, so it's really weird to see clean-cut jocks and dressed-up chicks talking to Joe Blow from down the street. BattleBots has way too much cognitive dissonance going for my tastes, I guess..

  67. Re:You know what ultimatly killed this wonderful s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Look at Reality TV for fucks sake. First it was Survivor, -HUGE- hit. Then came Big Brother, Temptation Island, Fear Factor, Worst Case Scenario and a slew of other knock-offs, which have watered down and sucked all the fun out of reality TV.

    Being a "HUGE hit", and being the first of its kind (in the US anyhow), does not excuse it from being insipid garbage. In fact many thinking people realized it was exactly that at the time. In fact I could be talking about BattleBots also.
  68. Good riddance. by sinserve · · Score: 2

    Battle bots was a mole on Comedy Central, which is about the only chanel I watch, after HBO.

    First of all, the robots went from beautiful works of art, to awful construction equipment:
    I don't want to see a miniature tank, with an axe mounted to its top. The "robots" where
    nothing more than evil looking lawnmowers.

    They should not have rewarded the most destruction resistant robot, but the most technically
    advanced. The idea of a "fight" is simply flawed, and reeks of testestrone driven, cheap male
    entertainment.

    Speaking of male entertainment, carmen electra has no business in a friken bot fight.

    I would pay $$$$ to see autonomous robots, put into a "maze" and let them discover their
    own exit paths. It would also be a great idea to encourage alternative robot designs, not just
    wheels and tank chains, I wanna see snake like bots, flying bots, swimming bots, you could
    also explore alternative sources of energy, instead of just relying on batteries; give boneses
    to bots which power their onboard computer with sun lights, etc.

    There is alot one could do with robot building skills, instead of investing resources on how to
    build the next destructive machine. They could cut down on the weight too, some of these beasts
    weight as much as 500 lbs.

    1. Re:Good riddance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell if they'd just build autonomous fighters I'd be happy, them my bloodlust and gadget envy are sated all at once.

    2. Re:Good riddance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speaking of male entertainment, carmen electra has no business in a friken bot fight.

      I'd refine that: Carmen Electra could care less about the tech, the folks making the robots, or the fight itself. Worse, she looks like she's really put off or bored by everything around her. Her disinterest shatters her credibility. If she was pumped up about it, I'd give her some credit.

      A better choice would be someone who isn't a sexpot yet still sexy in her own way. One example that comes to mind is the co-host of Junkyard Wars. The JW host at a minimum liked what was going on.

      As things are, Carmen Electra is just a prop; "look at me I'm Carmen Electra -- you have to be interested -- and oh, yeah, we have these robot thingies too". What a bad idea.

    3. Re:Good riddance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd really rather watch "cheap, testosterone driven entertainment" than a ridiculous dog-and-pony show. Oooh! Mazes! Yay!

      Personally, I'd rather watch paint peel than watch a robot get lost in a maze that a rat can navigate in two seconds. But hey, that's just me.

      Guess you're a big Robotica fan, eh?

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. This is a Trend! by mostaphalles · · Score: 1

    First Sept 11th 2001, all the terror and stuff

    Now Sept 11th 2002 battlebots is canceled...god help us all

    just kidding, battlebots sucked

    1. Re:This is a Trend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they cancel BattleBots, the terrorists have won!!

  71. Battlebots on water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought battlebots would be cooler on water. I mean, usually the robots don't destroy each other, just hit each other. Sometimes... but not usually. Think of little boats trying to sink each other though. Those spikes could puncture airtanks for floation, destroy outboard motors... They could even have underwater cameras.

    I think it'd be a lot cooler.

    1. Re:Battlebots on water by sdduuuude · · Score: 1

      Search on "battleboats" They use co2-powered bb's.

  72. Comedy Central == Evil Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that I'm a fan of BB, but leave us not forget that CC is the same bunch of bozos who cancelled the greatest TV show of all time: Mystery Science Theater 3000.

    1. Re:Comedy Central == Evil Empire by claud9999 · · Score: 1

      And: Strangers with Candy, Upright Citizen's Brigade, Strip Mall. Lowest-common-denominator and standup seems to be there focus, of late. Dunno who is running the channel but they've definitely focused on a different audience. Only show they can't cancel without serious public outcry is South Park. (Although I see the axe coming.)

    2. Re:Comedy Central == Evil Empire by TomServo · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget about TV Funhouse either. I know lots of folks didn't like it, but at the very least the Mnemonics bits had me giggling like an idiot.

      I still couldn't understand why MST3K was let go from there. I mean, why lose that show (which can't have cost all *that* much to produce) and instead show SNL 5 times a day, and give us not one, but two showings of the Scott Baio classic "Zapped!" every day?

  73. thank god by IRNI · · Score: 2

    that was the most boring show i have ever seen. A bunch of stupid little radio controlled buckets of steel hitting each other. Oh my the drama. I would rather sit and stare at a wall. Or watch fletch...

  74. American comments are welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    sucking some dick!

    All Americans willing to prove the lack of national culture are welcome with comments like the quoted one.

    All American willing to say something proving that the stating the lack of American culture is wrong - are welcome as well.

    The lack of comments will prove that the most of Americans do not care about their culture at all.

    Today is the right day to show what is the spirit and the culture of America.

  75. Where's the testosterone? by jlowery · · Score: 1

    Battlebots appeals to my raw manly desire to see well engineered machines disembered in brutal ways.

    And to see Carmen Electra in a tight tanktop.

    UGH! ME WANT MORE!

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  76. Reason ??? by rsgopi · · Score: 1

    What is the reason that Comedy Central Scrapped the program ?, I dont think its lack of viewership.Hey this is a country of gadget lovers.

  77. Needed room by dmanny · · Score: 1

    For even more Saturday Night Live

    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
  78. I have said this before. by garcia · · Score: 2

    Battlebots was good when it was a once-a-year geek-a-thon, not a show on all the fucking time w/the same boring, old, shit.

    I was excited to see the tournament on /. and other places on the 'Net once a year. It was fun. I got to see a lot of ingenious designs, etc. On TV it was crap (especially when that fat fuck from late night TV had one w/his face on it, fan or not, it was lame).

  79. Bill Nye by ELCarlsson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was all over when they got rid of Bill Nye. You gotta love the "Science Guy"

  80. Funny you should mention that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TechTV expressed interest in BattleBots before Comedy Central picked it up, but he with the bigger pockets wins.

  81. Re:You know what ultimatly killed this wonderful s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Survivor sucked ass. Other forms of reality TV suck ass too.

  82. Half of you say good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other half is probably the entire audience for the show, which means that advertisers are reaching at most about a thousand geeky teenagers and poor college students. Anyone can see that those economics can't support a cable tv show.

  83. boring rules. by Inominate · · Score: 1

    The rules are too boring. No fun weapons are allowed.

    Dammit, I want explosions, flame throwers, stun guns! Most of battlebots comes down to
    1. A robot breaking from bad design.
    2. A robot being flipped over in some way.
    3. A draw.

    There are very few good hits.

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. Am I sad? Not really, no. by berniecase · · Score: 1

    I watched two seasons of BattleBots, and then gave up. The show just started getting too boring to hold my interest. There were some really great bots, but some battles were just lame and went nowhere. Also, I felt that they should have shown more about the building of the robots, similar to Junkyard Wars (we miss you, Cathy Rogers!)

    At least it wasn't as bad as Robotica.

    Oh wait, the show wasn't bad, it was the Zappa that was bad.

  86. Inane presenters by CormacJ · · Score: 2

    The problem is that lately the comedy channel seemed to be trying to turn the show into a vehicle for Carmen Electra and the hosts and only having breaks from this for actual robot fighting.

    While Carmen is nice eye candy, having commentators that are making more inane comments than Dennis Miller ever did is too annoying for most people, and this probably caused the kill off.

  87. Farscape too by Cyberllama · · Score: 2

    I know its not 100% on topic, but Farscape has also been cancelled. When the "best sci-fi show" on television on a Sci-fi only network can't make it, what hope is there for finding quality televsion anywhere?

    1. Re:Farscape too by forkboy · · Score: 2

      No kidding dude.....why the hell is Sci-Fi cancelling their 2nd highest rated show? (behind SG-1 I believe)

      We can only hope that someone else picks up Farscape....I'm going to be awfully sad if they don't.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:Farscape too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.farscapeweekly.com/cancelled.htm

      aparrently Sci-Fi didn't want to pay full-price for it.... and the company that owned it said no. So they cancelled

  88. Endless Wedgies by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    Like you said, every robot seemed to boil down to either a wedge or a flipper. The show killed itself via restrictions that ultimately only produced these two forms. The robots rarely did much to each other because of this and the controlers had such shitty control you had to wonder if they ever tested their robots before coming on the show.

    They have to start allowing projectiles and chemicals. Base the show out at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in a concrete bunker/sound stage with remote cameras and allow for some real robot wars.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Endless Wedgies by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah get Jonny 5 and his other four friends to have a brawl.

      Short Circuit reference above.

    2. Re:Endless Wedgies by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Bull fucking shit.

      Whyachi/Son of Whyachi? The Master and the shit his creator made? No regret? Sure at lighter weights it was a lot harder to design for, but for middle and up? THere was alot of good designs there. Little Drummer boy was a GREAT example of what a little imagination and a little ass bot can do. It had a great weapon. A fast spinning drum. It worked beautifully too. It even defeated most wedge and flipper bots based on the ideals it was built on.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  89. A Real Sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to keep your eyes off of Carmen Electra's boobs, now that is a truly challenging sport!

  90. Not A Sport by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

    another network will pick it up and keep this sport alive

    It's not a sport if you can drink a beer while participating.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
    1. Re:Not a sport by OneFix · · Score: 2

      The real "geek" sport on TV is "Junkyard Wars". That is far more of an intellectual and competitive exercise than putting wheels on a metal box.

      I whole-heartedly agree. Not to mention the fact that at least 3 of the members from each team have to be pretty good at alot of things...in all actuality, the win/lose variable is generally how good their "expert" is. They have to build everything from drag racers and hovercrafts to catapults. Those guys on BattleBots don't even have to make their own machine. Anyone remember the kid that bought a complete BattleBot on E-Bay?

    2. Re:Not a sport by Keybounce · · Score: 0

      Can you gamble on it?

      Lightweight question:
      Will Ziggo win? Or will someone with a robot specifically designed to take it out succede? (Answer: It was taken out by a specialty bot in its first TV appearance).

      Heavyweights:
      Will "Son of Whyachi" make it to the end? Will it defeat BioHazard?

      Will Torro manage the full season without a technical problem that kills its flipper? Even if it does, can it win the shoving match?

      Will Taz-Bot manage to outdrive, and out-manuver BioHazard this year? Or will it be a perrenial #2-#4 bot?

      Will the 6 wheeled pusher bot outshove the others? If it can outdrive and get to the side of the others, it has more pushing power than anyone else (sorry, I don't remember the name).

      Or will some unknown new bot make it all the way to the quarter-finals, semi-finals, or even take the victory?

      Who will win the heavyweight division? Do you know? Or do you want to bet?

      Yes, you can gamble on BattleBots. I would never have guessed that Son of Whyachi would have abandoned that excellent walker base, which gave it both extra weight for the weapons and base (more stable, less flippable), and extra clearance/distance between the weapons and the base (better able to inflict damage without taking it), for a "standard" wheeled base and a faster weapon spin. My prediction: It will take too much internal damage from feedback when it hits, and not make it to the final just from wear and tear. Care to bet against me?

      Is BattleBots too predictable? I don't know. For you football fans, do all the lineups fit into 1 of three basic categories (4 blockers and 3 receivers on front, QB and ball snapper, 2 ends as the basic lineup, a couple of variations on that). Do people trying new things, like a shotgun (QB starts at a distance, so that the time spent running backwards is saved) abandon those because this is the "tried and true" system that works?

      Do all the teams on baseball agree on where the 9 outfielders should be placed (3 distant, 4 along the baseline, pitcher and catcher)?

      Is the question of which teams will be in the top 4 pretty well known before the season begins?

      BattleBots is MORE changable than any established sport, just because anyone can enter.

      Yes, a few (1 or 2) bots have been sold on Ebay. Most are made by the user. Some are totaled. Some are rebuildable/repairable.

      Michael

  91. Re:Good riddance! by mike3411 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. Comedy Central tried to take something that's interesting and entertaining in its combination of technical details and battle, and dumbed it down to a level that pained anyone who tried to enjoy what makes robots fighting worth watching. I got really excited the first season, and kept hoping they'd move away from the dumb-as-fuck annoucers and babes, and towards the more detailed descriptions like what Bill Nye (went to my high school :) would provide. But they didn't, so the show sucked, and refused to watch. Fuck them, it's a viable format/content for a show, so someone will get it right we'll get robot-fighting goodness.

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  92. yes! by frizz · · Score: 1

    I never understood why battlebots was on comedy central. I never found it funny (nor interesting). Maybe they'll bring back "Strangers with Candy."

  93. changing the hours by _crunge · · Score: 1

    What made me stop watching battlebots is it seemed they played with the times it was playing on....They switched the time temporarily I fell out of the habit of watching it as I am sure many other people did...

  94. This Sucks, but... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    well, i guess we'll ahve to start watching robot wars or robo challenge or depth charge or...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:This Sucks, but... by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Oh well.
      RobotWars (the British one) is better anyways.

  95. I used to think that... by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    I used to think the way you do, that RobotWars was great, and Battlebots a pale imitation. Two things changed my mind.

    First, discovering something of the history behind the two. Battlebots was originally called RobotWars, but a promotion company stole the name and sold it to the Brits.

    Second was watching them head to head one night. The RC "bots" on the show called RobotWars are pathetic, wimpy little things compared to the monsters on Battlebots. They have prettier paintjobs and grillwork, combined with "weapons" that can barely scratch tinfoil. If "functional" and "actually able to cause real carnage", and "shredded steel plate flying through the air" are "simple", then give me simple any day.

    That said, the Comedy Central coverage of the Battlebot events is pretty bad, and getting worse. I'm a huge Craig Charles fan, and would rather listen to him than anyone who has ever worked for "Comedy Central Sports". But dismissing Battlebots because the coverage is lame is like dismissing the Olympics because NBC is lame -- it's missing the point. I think that Comedy Central dropping the show may be the best thing that could happen to the show.

    1. Re:I used to think that... by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      The problem with all that is that they only ever feature three matches on battle bots... for a grand total of about 9 minutes of the show. The rest of it is the "coverage" that you admit is horrible and i'd say is *REALLY REALLY* horrible.

      To improve the show, i'd nix almost all of the coverage and 'get to know 'ya' stuff and offer more construction details and a LOT more actual robot combat with better commentators.

    2. Re:I used to think that... by hyphz · · Score: 2

      > If "functional" and "actually able to cause real
      > carnage", and "shredded steel plate flying
      > through the air" are "simple", then give me
      > simple any day.

      Umm.. HypnoDisc?

      Umm.. the current UK series has a flipper which threw the opposing bot into the safety glass and out of the arena FROM THE CENTRE OF IT?

    3. Re:I used to think that... by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      I've taped every episode, sans commercials (yeah, take that comment and shove it).

      The shows are 21-22 minutes long, including this season. Past seasons they'd get 3 fights in a half hour segment, this season they're doing 4 by choosing a short-and-sweet first fight.

      Granted the "Professor Carmen" stuff really sucks, but I do like to hear a little bit about the builders. And even though Bill and Tim can be a little annoying, they do keep the history of certain bots going.

      Remember, some builders (and specific bots) have been attending the event for YEARS. Perfect example is Dallas Goecker and Sallad, whom was featured this week and has a strong showing.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
  96. Reality shows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First it was Real World/ Road Rules.

    They were crap too.

  97. So What? by greymond · · Score: 1

    So now all the battle bot owners can just convert there shit to robot wars and we will have just one show instead of 2, which I think would be better anywho.

  98. Far too "orderly" combat by pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The idea of making a machine to go in their to kill other machines sounds really cool. Hell, for the first two seasons, I watched it religiously, making it one of only two shows I watch regularly (the other, South Park, only having like 4 new episodes every six months anyway, so not all that time consuming).

    However, by the third season, I (and I think *most* people) started realizing the choices of possible machine types, as limited by the extensive rules, made every "new" combat nothing more than a replay of something I'd already seen, with a new paint job.

    Even now, I would start watching it again, if they ditch 90% of the rules. As long as a bot won't explode (and even "small" explosions, such as their 3" thick plexi cages would contain, seem alright), no holds barred. Flying bots? If someone can make them, good luck. Projectiles? Yup. Fire? Yup. Electricity? Yup. Entanglement? Again, Yup.

    Make it a *real* contest of who can build the better bot, rather than who can build the better table-saw-or-jackhammer-on-wheels, and it would become interesting again.

    I want to see REAL robot destruction. I don't want every match to end with one bot immobilized, mildly injured from a battery wire breaking, or its antenna clipped, or havings its wheels chopped off. I want sparking circuit boards, small explosions, the smell of ozone (well, okay, the home viewer couldn't enjoy that part), chunks of metal everywhere, etc.

    Until then, I don't even care if Carmen starts hosting it nude. It has completely lost its "newness" appeal.

    1. Re:Far too "orderly" combat by TheSync · · Score: 2

      Even now, I would start watching it again, if they ditch 90% of the rules.

      The arena could be buried under 10 feet of dirt with 1' thick concrete walls, accessable only by two small tunnels. Robotic cameras are mounted in the walls behind tempered glass. No live studio audience (saved money right there), just two "unlimited" robots going at it.

  99. Thank God for Geeks by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

    A ton of comments that say "Battlebots blows, Robot Wars where it's at". I'm sure Robot Wars will be cancelled next season. You don't make money peddling to geeks. If everyone here was happy, we'd be watching the 30th season of Star Trek TOS on linux boxen. Of course someone would be trolling saying "Spock's gay, I like Windows 98, and my SUV is the biggest".

  100. I bet....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same thing will happen to Junkyard wars. They jew it up and people no longer like it anymore.

  101. Survival Research Labs by RatBastard · · Score: 2
    If SRL had been behind BattleBots, it would have been as cool as Hell, rather than lamer than shit.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  102. Keep battlebots alive? by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    Keep battlebots alive?

    Hey man, battlebots were already around before Comedy Central decided to turn it into a tv series. Battlebots is an independant organization, that will likely return to its hobbyist roots, and be better off than it was before.

    The mantra is not so much "keep battlebots alive" as it should be "free battlebots".

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  103. yeah, right by Demonix · · Score: 1

    Sorry, gotta disagree here, and the reason why are the weapon limitations.
    I mean, it just gets friggin BORING watching two wedge designs trying to flip each other. Start allowing team melees, projectile weapons, acid/flamethrower weaps and small explosives and lets see what happens.

    I had a bot design in mind that involved launching drone bots forcible at the opponents with two swinging axe arms. it would get demolished by a little wedge, but whats more exciting - a 'mothership' bot with 4 ramming/piercer drones that launch forcibly with swinging axes or a little wedge with a lot of torque?

    That's what I thought :)

    --
    when all is said and done, all a man has left are his blades and his honor.
  104. The *end* of battlebots? by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 2

    How will the cancelation of one robot fighting series preclude the end of all mechanical combat sports? I think we can all agree that back-to-back-to-back-to-back battlebots episodes lead to an early death by overexposure, not a failure in the premise of the show. I'm sure as long as monster trucks hold some sort of "rally" somewhere, and giant transforming tractors spit fire, there will be exhibition competitions of remote-controlled (and autonomous) creations dueling it out. Even if they aren't always televised, they will continue to exist. And with the removal of the stagnant Battlebots from the running, maybe we will see some real innovation. Or at least someone will bring back the fun.

    --
    This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
  105. Comedy Central has only themselves to blame by theoramus · · Score: 1

    Many of you slasbots dont seem to realize that battlebots is a separate entity from the battlebots show. It was going on before the show and before the Pay-Per-View event some of you may know about. Comedy central tapes the competition and edits it until it turns to utter crap. They pick 3 fights for every thirty minutes and pack mind-numbing fluff between them by:
    a) having those boring(and often lame) "meet the builder" blurbs before the fights.
    b) have one of the interviewers do a blurb which usually ends up being worse than the builder interview blurbs.
    c) show the post-fight interviews featuring either a blank-minded barbie asking idiotic questions or the comics cracking a joke.

    They could easily put in 6-8 fights per 30 min (12-16/hr) if they just eliminated a and b above, and had interviewers who knew their shit. That way the majority of the show would consist of fights, and therefore allows for the full tourney tree to be broadcasted.

    I should also mention that advertising for the season 5 premier was virtually nonexistant, and after the idiot execs saw the ratings numbers for the first few season 5 shows, they decided to cancel it.

  106. Good Riddance by sofo · · Score: 1

    C'mon guys it's boring after the first few matches.

    Now... when the 'bots are Mech. sized with full armament that's a whole new ball game. :)

    Andrew

  107. not going to FILM it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they filmed any of them? I'd guess a low-bucks television show like battlebots being shot on video tape rather than film.

  108. Myabe now by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    The 'bots can live in peace, sing music in the sun and put flowers in their hair.

    Wouldn't it be a wonderful world when every battlebot in the world would stand together in a line holding hands, grapplers, chainsaws, hammers etc and sing Kumbayaya.

    Now that peace has a chance we should embrace this oppurtunity to make this planet a better place for Humans and 'Bots alike. Let the barbaric killing for amusement stop and these simple machines rove around the fields of daisys like they where meant to.

    --
    >
  109. Re:You know what ultimatly killed this wonderful s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but the European versions have nudity and stuff :P

  110. Need more variety, need more weapon choices by aaron_pet · · Score: 1


    I loved Battle Bots.

    I didn't like the fact that the arena was the same each year... I didn't like that the bots got points for nudging each other...

    I want to see bots that use the hammer to charge a weapon, I want to see other ways people can recharge their weapons.

    I want to see Thermite, I want to see EMP, I want to see electricution,

    (I don't want to see radio jamming... though... with artificial intelegence bots catagory, that would be fine!)

    I want to see spray paint that can cover up sensors, I want oil slicks,

    I want welding torches,

    another way of saving it would be to:

    Have a device that the bot must protect/keep from breaking while driving arround... and still perform other tasks.

    That way you could standardize the challenge somewhat, while still having unlimited combat.

    --
    Please use [ informative / summarizing ] SUBJECT LINES
    Flame me here
  111. it was so much better... by dunar · · Score: 1

    battle bots was so much better when it was a pay-per-view event. no crappy commentary, just robots smashing each other. it lasted something like 3 hours! it was still PPV in the spring of 2000. if i remember right, the first season on CC was a rehashed version of the last PPV (that I saw, at least.)

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    -dunar

  112. Upright Citizen's Brigade cancelled for BattleBots by allanc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I didn't mind BattleBots at first until I learned (via Janeane Garofalo on an appearance by her on The Daily Show) that the series that had been canned to make room for BattleBots was The Upright Citizen's Brigade, which was one of the funniest sketch comedy shows out there.

    After that, I couldn't stand to look at BattleBots.

    --AC

  113. But the sole point of BB is power and destruction! by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    They should not have rewarded the most destruction resistant robot, but the most technically advanced. The idea of a "fight" is simply flawed, and reeks of testestrone driven, cheap male entertainment.
    And that is exactly the point.

    I like testesterone driven, expensive male entertainment.

    I'm not going to spend thousands of dollars to build a cute gee-whiz "technologically advanced" robot. I am am planning to spend thousands of dollars to build (and test, and repair) a semi-autonomous fighting robot that I can pit against other similar devices.

    There is alot one could do with robot building skills, instead of investing resources on how to build the next destructive machine. They could cut down on the weight too, some of these beasts weight as much as 500 lbs.
    Yeah sure -- and there is a lot one could do with automobile tuning skills, instead of investing resources to build the next rubber-burning nitrous-powered drag racing machine. Sure, I could have spent the $5K to convert my car to electric power...

    But you know what? For many people, big/powerful/fast/dangerous hardware is FUN.

    Speaking of male entertainment, carmen electra has no business in a friken bot fight.
    Okay, on that point I agree with you 100%. They should have gotten Cathy Rogers (Scrapheap challenge, aka Junkyard Wars), or some other photogenic female with a three-digit IQ.
  114. i've been to a taping, by ZaBu911 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been to a battlebots show, live. Yes, fellow slashdotters. You could envy me. But you probably wouldn't want to.

    It SUCKS. It takes maybe 45 minutes in between rounds to set things up, you get to see a 3 minute fight, and you don't even get to stare at the hot announcers. Plus it's not a great place to pick up chicks. No wonder it was so easy to get our robotics club tickets...

  115. A free timeslot! by Alan+Holman · · Score: 1

    Good. Now maybe they can use that timeslot for my series THE BANANA CHAN ANIME HOUR! The scripts are available on-line at my web-site at http://members.shaw.ca/fhs/AlanHolman.htm It's Comedy! -- and they're Comedy Central! A perfect fit! ...oh someday I'll stop finding lame excuses to peddle my wares... sorry.

  116. Battlebots is pretty good - if you have a TiVo by jlower · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That way, you can watch a 30 minute episode in about 10 minutes, skipping all the commercials and filler.

    I see a lot of comments about how it wasn't innovative and didn't evolve but I think it did. And even though more fights were boring than not, when there was a good fight, it was really cool. Even though the show had the 'feel' of Pro Wrestling, I never thought the fights were pre-determined - don't see how they could have been.

    I hope some other network picks it up - I would miss it.

    1. Re:Battlebots is pretty good - if you have a TiVo by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 2

      Amen to that! I just watch the fights. My GF and I love the show. I watched that horrible rip-off once w/ the wrestling guys -- I doubt a single one of those robots would have survived a round in BattleBots...

      I wish that they would have allowed more variety in the weapons... perhaps it is something they will think about in the future (if it survives)...

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
  117. You nicked it from us English! by The+Real+Chrisjc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We had Robot Wars, which was much much better than your version (late night bravo anyone?). I can see why they want to cancel it. Live in the 'land of the free'. America shouldn't be called that for a long time now. The real 'land of the free' at the moment is england :)

    1. Re:You nicked it from us English! by sdduuuude · · Score: 1

      It started in San Francisco, not England, dude.

    2. Re:You nicked it from us English! by The+Real+Chrisjc · · Score: 1

      Damn!

      We still did it better none-the-less (in my opinion).

      Ah well, I was wrong.

  118. ARGH! by tuxlove · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been to the last four Battlebots season events, and they were a lot of fun. It definitely ruins the TV show for you, because TV cannot come close to the live event. It's truly sad that they're having problems. I will miss it incredibly if they can't defibrillate it somehow.

    That said, it was clear from the last event that Battle Bots is on its way out. The robots are getting stale, and the rules surrounding robot design and weaponry are too restrictive. There were few, if any, innovative robot designs this last time. Mostly the same old robots you see each season, or knockoffs of existing robots. They even had to cancel the customary rumbles which take place after the finals (and even had to cancel the last half of the last final), because they were shut down by the San Francisco FD after one of the robots started ripping holes in the battlebox and spewing metal projectiles into the audience. We were rather disappointed at the whole thing, and decided to only see the last day of competition next time (it takes a weekend for them to do all of the filming). Looks like there may not be a next time.

    Seems like it will take a bit of work to resurrect the show. Not only will they need to get a new sponsor, but they'll have to spice it up somehow to get better robots. They will also need a better battlebox...

  119. Re:Sad but... but auto racing is a true sport by 1101z · · Score: 1

    To be a true sport...

    you should have to compete directly against another person(s) or team(s) (notice the word "directly"?)


    Ok bunch of guys driving cars on the coarse competeing directly against each other.

    there has to be an objective measure of victory (that's right no French judges that have been bought off...this applies to boxing, too...it's only a sport when someone is knocked out)

    Some one crosses the finish line first.

    you have to exert yourself physically (that's right chess isn't a sport nor is EQ)

    You try driving a multi-ton(with aerodynamic down force added in) car throught a corner at 200 miles per hour with out power steering. Its hard, it make you exert yourself.

    you have to be able to be injured in the normal course of play not as some freak accident.

    People crash and hurt themselves in almost every race, that is the reson that most people watch.

    the athlete has to be you (not a horse, dog, robot, or blow up doll)

    They are the ones driving the car is just a tool. It is like saying that hockey is not a sport because they use sticks and skates.

    ideally there should be an object to struggle over such as a ball, puck or some such but this one has been waved by my brother-in-law who pointed out that boxing doesn't have this and boxing is definitely a sport as long as it doesn't go to the judges...that should be considered a draw if no one goes unconcious.

    They struggle over the space on the coarse. Other than that I completely agree, I had the same kind of arugements during the winter olympics because there are lot of non-sports in the winter olympics.

    --
    One day people will learn the folly of Winbloze, Linux Rules!
  120. Re:Good riddance! by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

    What makes robotwars so entertaining is that the robots are made by a couple of grease monkeys in their garage on a 2 thousand dollar budget with lawn motor engines and old shoes. When one of the really well made spinning disks hits a piece of junk it breaks into tiny peaces.

    Some of them are well made, and they usually rip the competition in half. When two monsters face each other it kind of sucks (like the world championship between drillzilla and razor that was on TNN recently) but it's not that bad because it's always some kind of grudge match.

    In battlebots, all you get is invunerable robots scoring points on each other by getting weapon hits and doing no damage. They never show the little guys running around trying not to catch on fire.

    --
    "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
  121. the M O L E Next BETRAYAL *INFO* by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    That show freaking owns! It's a show where players try to guess who of them is the insider paid to keep them from winning money. Whoever knows the least about the mole gets booted every show. Great show!
    WHY WAS IT PULLED?

    The winner was Bill, the admiral. Friday Sept. 7 they said the next episode will be the 14th. The week of Sept 11th, on Friday, America's FUNNIEST OME VIDEOS was on instead!

    Apparently because Bill, an Admiral, was the Mole, ABC canned the show to avoid making the army/navy look bad. True! Thank disney.

    The show returned in the summer..
    to face AMERICAN "IDLE". Yes, people watched American Idol instead of The Mole.

    So. The mole is a sweet show but they gave out too many easy clues like the episode 9 clue with AdMiRaL in green INTRO text, which I discovered.

    Sign the mole 3 petition (come on SlashDot readers work together!)
    http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl /signed.cgi? mole3
    8,500 SIGNATURES!

  122. Just a transition by sdduuuude · · Score: 1

    The sport of combat robots is growing quickly, yet quietly. Three years ago, BattleBots didn't even have a TV contract.

    Now, there are several private, local tournaments held semi-annually, thousands of robots in weight classes ranging from 1 lb to 400 lbs, Toys, Video Games, and even competing shows such as Robot Wars, Depth Charge, and the recently cancelled Robotica, which was pretty boring.

    Some may see this as the end of BattleBots, but I beleive it is simply part of a transition from the wrong TV network (Comedy Central) to one that will present the event properly, as a incredible mechanized competition. This could be TLC, Tech TV, or even a cable sports network that could present it in a NHRA-type of broadcast.

    For those who are bored with it, take the time to find a live event near you and you will understand how amazing the sport (competition) of robotic combat is.

    D

  123. I'm glad! by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

    I'm glad comedy central canceled it. I've seen similar shows. (they showcased a similar program, (from the UK, I believe, though don't hold me to it) on PBS a few years ago, and it was done VERY well, but the presentation of the comedy central version, well, no sir, I don't like it. maybe someone else will pick it up, and do it RIGHT.

  124. It All Went Downhill When... by Tsali · · Score: 1

    ... they started doing random drug tests on the RC'ers. The free agent market also picked up and the agents for the 'bots started getting greedy.

    I think they canceled the show before there would be a labor strike, personally.

    Isn't Disney going to have a show on it, sans Carmen?

    --
    This space for rent.
  125. My sentiments exactly. by buswolley · · Score: 1

    I like the concept of battlebots, but their weapons are too limited. Rarely is there much damage, there is hardly any innovation of design, new weapons, new techniques etc. they look like a bunch of lame bumper cars. get the show exciting , C'mon.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  126. Those annoying WWE-style idiots by reformhead · · Score: 1

    I far prefer the condensed late-night version of Robot Wars hosted by - of all things - Joanie, where it's nothing but fights. No interviews, no filler, no inane chatter. Just killing and lots of it.

    Barring that, give me the British version of Robot wars every time.

    The only useful thing from Battle Bots were the killsaws - cool.

    RIP Battle Bots.

    D.

  127. Hosts by 1nsane0ne · · Score: 1

    Does this mean Carmen Electra will have to go back to posing nude in playboy to make some cash? Thats a lot safer for her, this way overweight geeks can just stare at her picture and she doesn't have to worry about getting to close to them during interviews.

  128. Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show really took a nosedive when it started to get all self-conscious and trendy anyway. I mean, you can get announcers who look like models but fercrissake, at least let someone with a brain write their commentary for them so they don't sound and look like complete annoying morons.

  129. Innovations were stale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Battle Bots, like most TV shows, only survives as long as it draws an audience. And as cool as those robots all were, after a few episodes only "loyal" viewers kept watching because there was a clear "glass ceiling" that was limiting the performance / size / appearance of all the robots.

    In a few years once technology has put more gadgetry in the builders hands, the show will be back.

  130. The show might be dead, but the sport isn't by xtal · · Score: 2

    How does killing the show translate into killing robot fighting? IIRC there are several groups popping up that fight robots in the street, parking lots, a variety of locations. I know when I was in university there were a lot of people who were talking about this and building bots - there are already lots of organizations looking at other robot sports, like robot soccer and AI kart racing.

    YMMV.

    --
    ..don't panic
  131. New formula: A real sport plus explosions by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* How many times can you watch remote controlled scrap metal bump into each other and flip each other before it gets boring? *)

    That is like saying, "How many times can you watch a bunch of sweaty guys bounce a ball around a wooden floor and toss it thru a ring." Yet sports fans can never get enough.

    They have to treat it more like a sport, including making the builders into celebrities. I am sure there is a Kobe Bryant of smashbotics out there.

    And finally, they need *explosives*. You have to get rid of the idea of a live audience, at least a close one though. But roughly 80% of all men like explosions.

    Make it a true sport with explosions and it becomes a sure winner with males.

    BTW, why no Geek Channel? Or at least a Guy Channel. Then we can see the 3 Stooges too. Most females lack a gene to make them appreciate The Three Stooges and explosive hardware.

    1. Re:New formula: A real sport plus explosions by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 1

      You might not have it in your area but there already is one...

      http://www.techtv.com

  132. And furthermore... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    ...calling this nonsense a "sport" is possibly the dumbest thing I think I have ever read. It's geeks with remote controls and shares about as much with sports as dog shows, wrestling, and dare I say it, NASCAR.

    Fun to watch, possibly. Actual competition, ok. But a sport? Give me a break.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:And furthermore... by baskil · · Score: 1

      Looking up sport in the dictionary, you'll notice that a sport does not necessarily have to be a physical activity (just "An active pastime; recreation."). I would not call creating, and then piloting these bots in combat with each other passive, therefore it is rightfully called a sport. It may not be played at the Olympics, but then again, neither is American Football.

      And on the NASCAR thing, these guys go through hell to turn left 1000+ times in a race. Intense heat, breakneck speeds, loss of water weight, and other cars trying to maneuver around them are just some of the dangers that they have to face. They have to train hard, and keep in good shape in order to race successfully. No, they may not be triathletes, but they're not professional bowlers either.

  133. What EVER will I masterbate to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh my, oh my! C3PO

  134. TECHTV may purchase rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posted as AC to protect the innocent(me)
    I was an intern at ZDTV (now techtv) back in the red-head Kate Botello days when battlebots(tm) first started pitching the idea of turning their event into a television broadcast. ZDTV was the first bidder and was very interested, but eventually lost out to Comedy Central. Now that TECHTV has a larger audience and the deep pockets of one Paul Allen, it will be interesting to see if they pursue the broadcast rights to this program.

  135. Re:But the sole point of BB is power and destructi by iamblades · · Score: 1

    The hot chicks in BattleBots aren't that bad, because they're only there for the T&A, and dont do any real announcing. Carmen is actually not bad at all, and the bots this year are looking cool too.. :)

    Hopefully some other station picks it up. It didnt really fit on comedy central, but it was a good show. Much better than Robotica or RobotWars (the TNN peice of crap at least).

    --
    Shit adds up at the bottom...
  136. Blessing in Disguise by TeamRV · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey Folks,

    Cool to see that BatttleBots has made the Slashdot news :)

    My name is Jon Autry, I have competed at two of the BattleBots competitions, and at several smaller regional competitions. I have been building bots now for close to two years: http://www.robot-village.com

    Here are a few comments from a BUILDERS perspective: (these comments and thoughts are my own, and in no way reflect the opinion of BattleBots INC. or any other builder)

    As a competitor at BattleBots, I had mixed emotions when I heard that CC had decided NOT to extend their contract.

    I remember hearing the first commercial for BattleBots on Comedy Central. I thought: "Sweet! That sounds like it will ROCK!" but I was also confused as heck as to why in the world Comedy Central would be picking up the program?! Hey, I didn't really care at the time... I just thought the idea of seeing machines fight was awesome, and would take it any way I could get it.

    After watching a few episodes, I was addicted to the show. All I could think about was: "What kind of bot would I build?!". I went along like this until I finally decided to try MY hand at fighting robots.

    It took me nearly six months to make my first bot, and I can tell you that I learned more in those six months than I did in High School. You cannot appreciate the time, work, and research that goes into making one of these robots, until you do it yourself. The science and physics involved in engineering one of these machines needs to be focused on more, (IMHO) instead of "dumbing the show down".

    After attending my first BattleBots in Spring 2001, I couldn't wait for the new season to air on CC. However, after seeing the competition live, watching it on CC only made me frustrated. Here are a few of my "gripes" with the way CC presented the show:

    • For some reason, it seemed that Comedy Central did not even SHOW a good portion of the great fights that took place. Instead, a lot of fights featured to pushy bots that meandered around the box with little contact. I know when I first tuned in to watch robots fight, this wasn't what I had in mind... :) Trust me, there is MORE than enough trashing and thrashing to fill an entire episode each week through an entire season. But for whatever reason, the powers that be chose not to show more fights / less BS.
    • The sounds are fake. It blows my mind that they don't try to capture the REAL sounds from the fights. You can't appreciate how ridiculous some of the sounds are, until you hear the REAL sound of a screaming 2-stroke internal combustion engine in a robot. Or the sound of "The Judge" warping plates in the BattleBox floor with its pneumatic hammer from hell. Sounds is just TOO big a factor to fudge it up...
    • Prostitutes and profanity have NOTHING to do with fighting robots. Bill Dwyer ROCKS though. That guy is sincerely into the robots, and does a fine job commentating (IMHO). The rest of the "talent" just distracts you from what I would think people are tuning in to see: robots get ripped to shreds by other robots.
    • Too much talk, not enough breaking bots. More fights, more fights, more fights...

    Those are a few of my main beefs with the way the show is presented. I have to give CC props for picking up the show in the first place though, otherwise I don't think that I would be building bots now. But I think that they will do more for the "sport" (or whatever you want to call it) by letting it go, than they ever did by picking it up in the first place.

    If and when the show is picked up by another network, I hope the focus shifts more to the competition, and away from making it into a circus.

    Just my opinion...

    1. Re:Blessing in Disguise by iamblades · · Score: 1

      I agree completely with you. Comedy central just didn't know what to do with Battlebots. They were smart enough to get a reasonably good announcer compared to the other two US robot shows though. ZThe hot chicks weren't all that bad, but I don't think they should have just stuck them in to fill airtime.

      Hopefully it gets picked up by someone else and done right.

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
    2. Re:Blessing in Disguise by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1
      Jon's bot, Village Idiot, was in the May 2001 Event.

      See the full Middleweight field here.
      4 wins Jon, nice work!

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
  137. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is it that talking about Battlebots and the show that got cancelled because of it is offtopic?...and in every post that mentions UCB no less. Compared to UCB, Battlebots is nothing.

  138. Comedy Central Scheduling by kstumpf · · Score: 2

    Every time I turn on Comedy Central, there's either a crappy 80's movie starring a Wayans brother or that annoying news spoof (aka Dennis Miller rip) on.

    I think Comedy Central kills alot of shows due to bad scheduling. I used to watch Ben Stein and then they shuffled it around. I watched Battle Bots when I was home and it was on (rarely). I certainly try with all my might to watch the Man Show, but its just on at a bad time.

  139. How much did comedy central pay them? by Kasmiur · · Score: 2

    They say they can't hold due to no funding from comedy central. Well how much do they need? I mean crap if its a measly 50K then that shouldnt be that hard to raise.

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
  140. Self Destructed by adamjone · · Score: 2

    I'm an avid BattleBots fan. Every week a new episode airs, I'm planted in the chair with my beer and popcorn. Unfortunately, the show is losing it's appeal. I enjoy watching the fights. It was great during the second and third season when they would air back to back episodes, because I could count on seeing up to eight fights in a night. This limited the chance of seeing some wedge weenies bumping around and increased the chance of a couple of spinners knocking themselves silly.

    I think the show started to go bust when they went from two commentators and an interviewer, to a team that rivals professional baseball coverage. Do we really need this many people to host the show? Season 5 is by far the worst in this respect, with plenty of Carmen dancing in tight shirt and short skirt, and Tony Rock being Chris Rock's brother. The builders do not make good interview subjects, and the interviewers are even less apt in their role.

    To get more viewers, they need to show more fights, and less talk. The big attraction for me is to see machines that are not quite fully controllable ripping each other apart. Fully armored wedges are no fun to watch, but the point system can be adjusted to insure that these bots don't win. The best fights are usually the lightweights, as the power of the machine surpasses the ability of the driver to control it, and the low weight means little armor. Spinners are great fun (Ziggo!), especially when they fight each other. Spinners are even fun when they malfunction, as they tend to tear themselves apart when they become unbalanced (Mauler, Son of Whyachi). Flippers are entertaining as well(Toro!). I'm sure that the builders will continue to come up with more ideas on how best to wreck the opponent. I think the current set of limits on weapons are not hampering the builders either. In fact, I think the limits are fair. How much fun is it to watch one machine douse the other in water? About as much fun as the dunk booth at the county fair. The show needs to go back to a four fight format. Get rid of the useless interviews, prancing, and posturing.

  141. Re:GOOD! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "BattleBots may be entertainment but it's no more a sport than playing a videogame."

    I resent that. My right hand is quite athletic now, thank you.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  142. Re:Upright Citizen's Brigade cancelled for BattleB by AntiBasic · · Score: 2

    The UCB was THE greatest show of all time! They used to put them on at like Saturday morning at 1:30 a.m. but then they finally removed it. People haved all the episodes on VHS and VCD available on ebay. The UCB has tried to make a DVD available but friggin CC wants no part of it. I hate Comedy Central. Now Kids in the Hall isn't on at 2 anymore and they cancelled Strangers with Candy. The Man Show has its moments but it has run its course. Win Ben Stein's money is the same, its dead after this season, Southpark needs to be put down. They are donkey raping shit eaters.

  143. R2D2 goes postal by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* I have noticed a real growth in the types of weapons over the years. *)

    I forgot to meantion shooting (in addition to granades). Why can't they have Gatland guns and the like? Toss the live audience and let them go a it.

    (Then send the winner into Bin Laden's cave.)

  144. TechTV - ya listening? by LINUXWANNABEE · · Score: 1

    Actually, Mr. Norton or Martin Sergeant mentioned something about that recently so they are aware.

    I always liked the show, but I stopped watching when they bumped the time slot to 10:30 after the world's lamest golf show with Bill Murray (now that show SUCKED!!!). That's too late to stay up to watch battlebots. But I do enjoy the show and I have yet to see one of the rip-offs approach Battlebot appeal.

    What I like about the show is that it's NOT AI. Human on human in real-time. AI's about as exciting as watching those old vibrating football tables - only less so.

    I hope Tech TV picks them up. BattleBots is far more interesting than Leo book plug reruns (not that I don't like them the first time around!).

    :)

    Carmen Electra is always fun to look at, but every time she opens her mouth (to speak . . .) she kills it. That Tracy chick that used to do it was better. Not better looking, but better with a mic. Carmen kept trying to force something and it just wasn't happening. If you can't get Tracy back, give it to Morgan Webb.

    Robots and nerds are far from sexy anyway - wrong venue.

    1. Re:TechTV - ya listening? by syd02 · · Score: 1

      "Robots and nerds are far from sexy anyway - wrong venue."

      Robots are fascinating. The problem is that these things aren't robots...just remote controlled weapons.

  145. Re:Who would fly on it? by Eccles · · Score: 2

    I just bought a //e for $12 /me thinks back to summer long ago spent working to be able to buy a $1600 Apple //e...

    $12? [SOB!]

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  146. new fall line up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maximillian vs. Robocop...

    Terminator vs. IG-88...

    Johnny-5 vs. R2-D2...

    Data vs. Gort...

    C3-P0 vs. Cylon...

    even if it wasn't real... i'd still probably watch it...

  147. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  148. Mst3K again? by Roblem · · Score: 1

    So will the SciFi network pick up BattleBot as it saved MST3K in the past? It would seem a good fit. Of course a minor management change will replace it will replace it with a John Edwards dopes pinheads show or whatever. But hey, an extension is an extension...

  149. Thank god, Battlebots sucked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kinda wish I could remember the password to my account (or had access to the now dead net-mail website to get it) so the points that're going to be used to mod me down won't go to waste, but oh well.

    Battlebots was boring. You could tell that the hosts and most everyone participating (except maybe the shut-in oddballs who spent thousands making their SUPAR WEDGE ROBOT) clearly weren't into it, with the extremely forced commentary coming from the hosts, and the slightly bemused audience members half-heartedly waving the posters that were handed to them so they'd look half-enthused instead of wondering why they weren't somewhere else.

    The "Fighting" was nothing to write home about either. With the exception of a few bots, the rest were rather poorly designed "wedge bots" that really ARE just hunks of metal with wheels that run into things aimlessly. Watching most of the "battles" was depressing for me on the occassions I found myself watching this thing, waiting for something better to come on.

    a fair amount of the matches I saw went on like this:

    1. The two bots aimlessly try to charge eachother, while the "drivers" fiddled with their controls.
    2. After 1-2 minutes of missing eachother by a few feet, the bots run into eachother with a dull clank and a couple sparks. The blinking "Cheer" light comes on, and the audience pretends to be amazed.
    3. One of the bots is hit by one of the various moving obsticles in the arena, which promptly breaks (I can't remember how many times the giant hammers at the corners of the arena fell out).
    4. One of the drivers parks over a saw like an idiot, and gets his bot prompty torn to shreds. The audience cheers wildly because it's over, then the opposing bot is awarded the victory because the driver managed to not destroy his bot by slamming it into saws and sharp things.
    5. Carmen Electra realises the camera is on her, immeadiately removes the look of dispair and depression from her eyes, and quips off a one liner about how great the fight was before interviewing the greasy-haired winner about his stunning display of 3l33t sk1llZ.
    6. I sigh, and change the channel, and think back on the days when Bill Nye actually had something resembling a career.

    ~Fin~

  150. robot wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I much preffered robot wars anyway. for one thing it was the original series or at least based on it. technicly even though battlebots has become synonymous with robot fighting it is the rip off along with robotica.

    but this isn't just a troll I'll give some perfectly good reasons why I preffer robot wars.

    environmental hazards. this allows for a smaller faster and better controlled bot to have a fighting chance over heavilly armored goliaths.

    bigger bots. with a weight limit of 500lbs and bots almost half the size of their creators these bots are much more than little RC cars with shells.

    better designed bots. no wedges and flippers here. with most of the bots either self righting, or just plain unflipable the wedge and flipper designes are a rare sight. more often the bots are designed to totally obliterate each other. not a competition for someone who wants to take their robot home at the end (robotica)

    and finally my personal favorite. House bots.
    I know some people don't like them but when a robot just stops due to bad design it deserves a little more punnishment than just a count out. and sir killalot is just plain cool.

  151. Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmmm......

    Ummmmmmmmmmmm.........

    Fuckin lameness filter.

  152. Re:Well Not on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think there are not injuries or pain involved in professional wrestling then you you probably just don't care enough about wrestling. That's not a bad thing; there are more important things to worry about like world hunger, homelessness, and terrorist threats. However, I respectfully ask you to respect wrestlers who get hurt every night. Do you think Mick Foley faked his ear getting cut off or Jumping off of a 15 ft cage? Do you think Lita's broken neck is a publicity stunt? Do you think Owen Hart's DEATH is just really good acting? It's not supposed to be "real", but fake is not a real good word for it either. Try taking a suplex once and tell me if it's real or not.

  153. Re: Offtopic - Knock-offs by Maran · · Score: 1

    "First it was Survivor, -HUGE- hit. Then came Big Brother, Temptation Island, Fear Factor, Worst Case Scenario and a slew of other knock-offs, which have watered down and sucked all the fun out of reality TV."

    Erm, slight correction. Big Brother is a UK invention, and has been running here for 3 years. AFAIK, Survivor is more recent than that.

    But you're right, knock-offs kill all the interesting programs. There's a program over here on the BBC called "Airport" - It shows the behind-the-scenes working at London's Heathrow airport. Massive hit when it started (about 8 years ago, if memory serves), and it deserved to be. Some of the staff they followed on a regular basis have become "stars" in their own right. Unfortunately, the other networks saw the ratings and said "Me too!". Suddenly there's "Hollywood's Airport" (about LAX, lasted about four episodes), "Lagos Airport" (about guess where, lasted about 6 episodes), "Airline" (about EasyJest - a budget airline over here, still running, though God know's why)... None of which compared to the original. Then there's the reality shows, the "soap operas" who steal plotlines from each other, the game shows, the "gritty police dramas"... Bah!

    And it extends to the big screen as well. How many times have we seen a bunch of "killer asteroid" or "suddenly-active volcano" films all released at once?

    Maran

  154. Nah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, BattleBots? Gimme a break....good riddance...CC should just replace it with more SNL re-runs!

  155. Thank god its gone. Now get rid of Jimmy Kimmel!! by Primordiax · · Score: 1

    Thank god this stupid show is cancelled.

    A test pattern would be more interesting than this piece of crap. And furthermore, what the hell is it doing on *COMEDY* Central. Put something FUNNY in its place (and while you are at it, get rid of Crank Yankers and any other show that has the completely horrendous hack known as Jimmy Kimmel).

    --

    -Michael (Aristotle@Threshold RPG)
    http://www.threshold-rpg.com
  156. Ick. Good riddance IMO. by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2

    Never could figure out what all the fuss was about. It wasn't like these things were *programmed* or anything like that (then I would be impressed). Effectively playing bumper-cars with glorified RC racers doesn't impress me.

  157. Not a sport by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

    "Battle Bots" is outrageously lame.

    Robots fit a couple of genres

    -Cool looking contraptions -- these are always too hard to control and lose.
    -Doorjams with wheels. Always win
    -Spinning discs

    The easiest to evaluate a "sport" is to think "Could you gamble on this". Battlebots is too predictable to be called anything like a sport.

    The real "geek" sport on TV is "Junkyard Wars". That is far more of an intellectual and competitive exercise than putting wheels on a metal box.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  158. Re:You know what ultimatly killed this wonderful s by CvD · · Score: 1

    Actually Big Brother started off in the Netherlands. It was then licensed to other countries, first in Europe, then the US, too.

  159. Re:Good riddance! by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    invunerable robots

    Uh... when was the last time you actually watched BattleBots?

    Sure, the wedges are hardpressed to actually hurt another bot, but wedges rarely go the distance. Spinners and bladebots destroy them. Hell, just watch any match that involves Hazard, Son of Wyachi, or Warhead and you'll get to watch the other bot running around desperately trying to keep some of its parts together.

  160. Re:Good riddance! by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

    Robots Wars is horrible. It isn't a sport, not when the "loser" is subjected to destruction by the House Bots. No real reason to that other than entertaining the crowd.

    If I had build a bot, I wouldn't mind my opponent ripping it to shreds, that's what it's there for. But to have the House Bots shred my work just for ratings, that's just silly and a waste of my money.

    --
    Anything is possible given time and money.
  161. Re:Good riddance! by mttlg · · Score: 2
    In battlebots, all you get is invunerable robots scoring points on each other by getting weapon hits and doing no damage.

    Aside from Hazard, which ones are invulnerable? Vlad the Impaler? Biohazard? Ziggo? Toro? Minion? Backlash? All of these have both won a championship and been knocked out by an opponent, usually with lots of damage. Lots of others have been reduced to scrap (well, except for the Scrap Daddy bots, those started as junk) by their opponents. None of the other shows can match the destruction in Battlebots because of ineffective weapons and poor durability. They need house robots and pits and stuff because the contestant robots can't do the job themselves.

    They never show the little guys running around trying not to catch on fire.

    Maybe not, but the last episode did have a big guy sitting in a broken heap catching fire. It's much more impressive to set your opponent on fire when you don't have a flamethrower.

  162. Good riddance by ezell · · Score: 1

    ...to a worn out idea that was neither "comedy" nor "robotic" -- correct me if I'm wrong but isn't autonomy prerequisite to be classed a "robot?" Nothing there but souped-up r/c. Never saw the appeal. $0.02

  163. Wait for Full Metal Challenge by Smack · · Score: 2

    From the creators of Junkyard Wars, and with Cathy Rogers (and Henry Rollins) as presenters, it's like BattleBots but with full size cars. Coming to TLC in October.

    Website

  164. Good riddence! by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    The problem with Battle bots is they aren't "bots". They are remote control cars with a sledgehammer attached. Granted making this a requirement would change the participants abit (for the better if you ask me). Why don't they just televise the MIT robot wars every year?

    Plus the hosts were frickin annoying...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  165. It sucked... Not enough weapons and damage. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    They need to allow flame throwers, machine guns, grenaides, etc .. Have it all remotely controlled from a seperate room.. This constant bumping around till someone flips over was totally lame. Thats not battle, thats just DUMB.

  166. I'm not surprised. by Royster · · Score: 2

    It's pretty clear that all the studio shots are produced after the fact. They have the two guys interviewing the builders after each match. They have a few shots of Carmen Electra in front of the stands saying inane things that could be used next to just about any match. She probably cruised in, taped 20 minutes worth of gratuitous cleavage shots and breezed out.

    Heck, even Mark Biro is computer generated. How else could he survive in the battlebox. THink about it.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  167. What do you mean it sucked? /. Sucks by ScannerBoy · · Score: 1

    As a long time BB watcher I can only laugh when I read people saying they were bored after one episode. These must be the same people who have to download donkey pr0n because regular old sex just doesn't do it for them anymore.

    BB was, for the average 9-5er, a chance to dream and scheme about building the ultimate fighting machine. Sure I didn't have the cash, time, or tools but those guys on TV did, and I love to watch mechinized destruction.

    To all those who have said (in the same breath mind you) "I didn't watch the show...then later...it just never evolved..." Can you tell me how you can make such a judgment after not watching the show? Sure it evolved, in the first few seasons you had all kinds a wacky bots with different types of construction. Of course now people realize that there are really certain requirements to even enter the ring. Therefore a lot of the bots do infact look the same (the wedge bot being the most common it seems).

    Now your going to tell me "oh see thats when it got boring cuz they are all the same" WRONG again. Now all the bots in competition have to look for new ways to destroy the undestroyable bot. The way I see it BB is just getting good. Designers have worked out the bugs and are producing more proactive bots.

    While its nice to see everyones opinion on the matter, if you didn't watch the show don't bad mouth it. I used to think /. was a neat place where people of like minds could share information. Now I see its really just a place to bitch about anything you think is below you. If you can't equate hacking a linux kernel with turning wrenches on a titanium bot (for those of us non coders) then I don't think there is any hope for you to remove that melon sized brain box from your anus.

    I guess now I'll just have to wait for the state fair to roll around next year, all the tech schools do their own competition every year.

    For the record: Carmen Electra pissed the regular watchers off, we'd much rather have Bill Nigh(sp?) back. Most of the time she looks so bored to be there it hurts to watch her.

    --
    --Should work--
    1. Re:What do you mean it sucked? /. Sucks by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      Aye!!

      Carmen and her ilk can just go away. I didn't think she could be any worse than the "who am I" wench from season 2, boy was I wrong.

      Please, whomever gets BattleBots next, do NOT include a Carmen-esque commentator. Dan Danknick on the other hand....

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
  168. Aww man... by di0s · · Score: 1

    In the words of Cartman:
    "Ahh, son of a bitch!"

    Seriously though, Comedy Central has a lot of cool shows and this was one of them. Ah well, such is life and stupid TV execs...

  169. Re:But the sole point of BB is power and destructi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carmen Electra is a horrible choice for the job; she shows no interest. Her body language is saying "I'd rather not be here, but it pays the bills". It's not her type of environment and it's painfull to watch her.

    As said above Cathy Rodgers from Junkyard Wars -- or just about anyone who is truely interested -- would be a much better choice.

  170. One word. by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    Chinzilla

    Magius_AR

  171. Save your show - Protest like the 'Scapers :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suggestion to Battlebots fans...

    Follow the "Save Farscape" model. Farscape fans from around the world are protesting by writing letters, emails, faxes, and are even (right now) picketing outside USA Networks in NY (no kidding). Scifi's IRC server always has about 300 people logged into the Farscape chatroom and it peaks at abotu 600+ -- whatever the max is set to -- whenever Farscape actors or writers come in to update us. It's nuts... Mob mentality, I figure. But a lot of fun for us nerds with free time (God, I love being a "professional" musician). Word has it, people are taking notice. Heck, CNN Headline News even ran several segments about the campaign last night on TV! I guess it remains to be seen whether or not a fifth season comes out of it, but the show's creators love our effort for trying. :-) So anyway, if you love Battlebots, why not try organizing something similar? Just a thought... :-)

    Visit http://www.savefarscape.com for more info if you want to see everything people are doing.

  172. forget tv, VEGAS man! by bonewah · · Score: 1

    Shit, these guys need to take this show to vegas. If ever there were a match made in heaven its that.

  173. BattleBots IS on TLC by Snover · · Score: 1

    Robotica is its name. It's not quite the same -- it's more than just robots bashing each-other -- it has an obstacle course and other neat things.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  174. "Big Breasted Models" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Mick Foley had pretty big breasts.

  175. Re:Well Not on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Whole thing is fake... staged, BUT, as in the movies (Well, the creation of them) things can sometimes go wrong, THAT'S where the real injuries take place. that's where the deaths from falls happen, etc. the WRONG hold on someone in a pile-drive can really do true hurt, if not death... but done "properly" the wrestler can fake the amount of pain and injury they desire, or should I say, as the ppl who cut their paychecks say for them to have.

  176. Sports without TV by Keybounce · · Score: 0

    Can you even imagine baseball or football without prime time coverage?