1. There is not enough organisation between the people monitoring the cctvs and anyone who may or may not be interested in the content of the feeds for there to be any real risk of you being busted doing anything you, for what ever reason, shouldnt be.
2. Its a bit more than petty to bother to grab and post images and footage of people for no real reason, besides which the person who lifted the images/footage from the source are no doubt not permitted to do so in their terms of employment, in addition iirc its actually a criminal offence in the UK to do so without authority.
3. You are assuming that the feeds will be monitored constantly, or their their recordings of the feed, if the feeds are even being recorded at the time, at all often get looked at by anyone. In most cases the footage would only be looked at if there is a need to go back over the recordings. The manpower needed to do this on any large scale would quickly balloon to frightening levels as you would want people to constantly concentrate on single feeds on the off chance that something of import can be seen on it.
There's plenty of evidence of surveillance cameras saving lives and stopping crimes actually happening.
There was a case of one 15 year old girl walking home past midnight on her own from a party or some such, and police monitoring cameras spotting her and monitoring her (obviously with some concern), only some monster of a guy spots her, sneaks up behind her, and attempts to abduct her, live on camera. The police were there in about 60 seconds. Result is one live girl rather than a raped and dead one.
These things can and do work, obviously the limitation is you have to have eyes on the camera feed for it to be effective, and with so many cameras about (that 4 million figure is obviously inflated by cctvs in shops which in a large proportion of cases are only useful after the fact) its basically a case of having half a million security guards watching cameras for it to be 100% effective.
when you consider that, for instance, the british army rejects out of hand any talk of a conscription system. Basically if you want an effective army in todays age the troops have to actually _want_to_be_there, and most of the conscripts wont:o)
at issue here is the refusal for certain parties to realise that the US 0f A is, like most western civilisations, a secular one when it comes to religion. They are unfortunately attempting to force the continuation of the policy of having their views, and their doctrine, onto the rest of the populace , in this case the populace of the future. This narrowminded, division causing viewpoint is sadly one that is mirrored in alot of religions.
damned right they're hurting.Games workshop is more niche than the little crevace at the boom of wookie hole (big cave in UK). Their sales model has seemingly always tried to ignore this for some reason
you dont have to agree with the laws, you have to abide by them.
The difference between the 'ignorance is no defence' concept in law worldwide, and agreeing to something you have not read,
in the context of this thread, is massive.
yes i have, i use it all the time, it obviously does use more cpu cycles, but anything above ~1ghz should easily cope, and no it doesnt cause disk thrashing.
grab the trial and test it?
thats one HELL of a shot though. I'd be pretty annoyed if the Royal Navy shot down the best stroke of my life on the par 3000 hole i was playing on at the time:o]
FreeBSD does have the cvs system for managing source and ports source packages (as well as pkg_add etc) and it seems to me at least to be as effective than any other system (rpm, dpkg etc)
a few months?????? errrr not quite that long actually:o)
wtf is the point in reporting that a preview is almost ready for release, when the first preview was oooo 5 minutes before:o)
actually thats dead right, os XI (yes, os eleven) is gonna be built on the bsd 5 system:o) just it may not make it in 2003, seeing as theres another 7.1 pointreleases apple can use to fleece their userbase
Slashdot Mirror
shush, or the spammers will start sending spam offering operations to allow you to breathe through your ears ;o)
1. There is not enough organisation between the people monitoring the cctvs and anyone who may or may not be interested in the content of the feeds for there to be any real risk of you being busted doing anything you, for what ever reason, shouldnt be.
2. Its a bit more than petty to bother to grab and post images and footage of people for no real reason, besides which the person who lifted the images/footage from the source are no doubt not permitted to do so in their terms of employment, in addition iirc its actually a criminal offence in the UK to do so without authority.
3. You are assuming that the feeds will be monitored constantly, or their their recordings of the feed, if the feeds are even being recorded at the time, at all often get looked at by anyone. In most cases the footage would only be looked at if there is a need to go back over the recordings. The manpower needed to do this on any large scale would quickly balloon to frightening levels as you would want people to constantly concentrate on single feeds on the off chance that something of import can be seen on it.
There's plenty of evidence of surveillance cameras saving lives and stopping crimes actually happening.
There was a case of one 15 year old girl walking home past midnight on her own from a party or some such, and police monitoring cameras spotting her and monitoring her (obviously with some concern), only some monster of a guy spots her, sneaks up behind her, and attempts to abduct her, live on camera. The police were there in about 60 seconds. Result is one live girl rather than a raped and dead one.
These things can and do work, obviously the limitation is you have to have eyes on the camera feed for it to be effective, and with so many cameras about (that 4 million figure is obviously inflated by cctvs in shops which in a large proportion of cases are only useful after the fact) its basically a case of having half a million security guards watching cameras for it to be 100% effective.
when you consider that, for instance, the british army rejects out of hand any talk of a conscription system. Basically if you want an effective army in todays age the troops have to actually _want_to_be_there, and most of the conscripts wont :o)
at issue here is the refusal for certain parties to realise that the US 0f A is, like most western civilisations, a secular one when it comes to religion. They are unfortunately attempting to force the continuation of the policy of having their views, and their doctrine, onto the rest of the populace , in this case the populace of the future. This narrowminded, division causing viewpoint is sadly one that is mirrored in alot of religions.
stop being a netiquette/literary nazi. The intent of the [SIC] was clear even if it wasn't correctly used.
except ibm are probably so pissed off at them they'll let it go all the way and bury them in court/stretch it out so long that sco fold (hopefully).
damned right they're hurting.Games workshop is more niche than the little crevace at the boom of wookie hole (big cave in UK). Their sales model has seemingly always tried to ignore this for some reason
there is also a mod that lets you get more than one npc. (there are some issues with it still though)
what? all teenagers? :o]
but in most cases it still wont actually get back to the spammer.
parents/family may have bought said car maybe? just possible? :o)
you dont have to agree with the laws, you have to abide by them. The difference between the 'ignorance is no defence' concept in law worldwide, and agreeing to something you have not read, in the context of this thread, is massive.
yes i have, i use it all the time, it obviously does use more cpu cycles, but anything above ~1ghz should easily cope, and no it doesnt cause disk thrashing. grab the trial and test it?
have you looked into bestcrypt? www.bestcrypt.com
special interests? no just plain personal vested interests
yer , let's get him to waste millions on another microsoft pink elephant, someones gotta make em spend money ;o)
yes, for a change, instead of a plain ole maniac? :o)
"Vote Different (to who you thought you voted for)" (c) Bushco
thats one HELL of a shot though. I'd be pretty annoyed if the Royal Navy shot down the best stroke of my life on the par 3000 hole i was playing on at the time :o]
well they can!!! just attach a large number of rockets to the back of them!!!! :o]
someone mod this down fs.
FreeBSD does have the cvs system for managing source and ports source packages (as well as pkg_add etc) and it seems to me at least to be as effective than any other system (rpm, dpkg etc)
a few months?????? errrr not quite that long actually :o)
wtf is the point in reporting that a preview is almost ready for release, when the first preview was oooo 5 minutes before :o)
actually thats dead right, os XI (yes, os eleven) is gonna be built on the bsd 5 system :o) just it may not make it in 2003, seeing as theres another 7 .1 pointreleases apple can use to fleece their userbase