He was eating everything at least once in the month of filming.
To quote from youre website: "Unlike him, she accepted the responsiblity of eating wisely from their menu, and ended up losing weight and having her cholesterol go down. "
i.e. She, unlike 95% of customers, ate the "healthy options".
...Microsoft will have to integrate UFS into Windows in order to stay compatible and competive with every other OS. - Are you on crack or just extremely optimistic?:)
Don't get me wrong, logically speaking you are certainly correct. Unfortunately MS relies on a strategy of remaining incompatible and anticompetitive...
In theory you are correct. In practice all ISP's will not simultaneously commence paid spamhaus subscription and increase their fees. I would imagine that some ISP's may use this, either globally or as a premium value added service. Unless you are in a monopolistic market you will be free to choose a spamhaus-free (either lacking or only free zone transfers) ISP and it's assosciated lower costs.
Even then a lot of businesses may actually save money through reducing bandwidth costs due to spam. I hope they don't force those savings onto you...:)
We are fully in agreement, but prefer logical games over actual dry communication. That's the tech mindset in a lot of ways really - enjoying the mental stimulation for it's own sake.:)
I guess I interpret it differently. "News (as in stuff that matters) for Nerds". A combined declarative.
Semantic interpretation aside, I was trying to address the original post "Exactly how is this news for nerds? I understand that the prevailing opinion on Slashdot is hatred for the Bush administration, but I fail to see the 'nerd' aspect to this story. Politics aside, if it was a sci/fi or fantasy movie, I could understand, but this was simply a politically charged documentary about 9/11 and the Iraq war. What is next? Reviews of campaign ads?"
So I guess to use your AND example:
An item of news is: ("News for nerds") AND ("News for non-Nerds").
Should it be on/.?? Or should/. be reserved for news items that are: ("News for nerds") AND NOT ("News for non-Nerds")
That was my original question. I know my thoughts, any news that is of interest to our geek demographic should be posted. Be they political, scientific, technological, artistic, etc, etc. This is the inclusive OR belief.
My approach has been to use spamd (avoid thread creation overheads) and run a base spam assessment on all mail. The assesment is stored in the header of the mail and the users can then filter/sort accordingly. Any "evil" attachments are automatically toasted, although the heuristic is very lax due to a high number of techie users.
If required they can also set a spam level on the mail server in a MySQL user/account database to automatically delete mail over the specified threshold (for accounts receiving oodles of obvious spam).
It has a nice balance between performance, security, and leaving most of the control in the hands of the users. We haven't faced extreme loads but it hasn't even raised an eyebrow over the load so far. Most importantly, no unhappy usres complaining of missing emails...
This is something I have never seen a good answer for yet, paradoxically, we are the best equipped to supply the answer.
Which is it: News which is exclusively of interest to nerds, or news which is of interest to a group including nerds. Exclusive or inclusive logical OR.
Most Trek is just a touch too trite to satisfy the sci-fi fan in me, but watchable on the odd occasion.
Then along came Enterprise with it's complete lack of plot (don't worry, we'll have another "decontamination scene") and a theme song that, that, that... it almost defies description.
The way I see it, it could be used as a grounds for a justifiable homicide defense in a murder trial. Really. It is so bad it should be declared a Weapon of Mass Destruction. It makes Ipecac syrup seem like a mild regurgitant. I would rather stab out my ears with sharpened chopsticks, than voluntarily listen to it again. This song is so bad it makes you envious of the deaf - I'm pretty deaf in one ear all ready (damn chopsticks, lucky I only had one) but it keeps getting in the other one, dammit.
Then, after all that I got sucked into the current (third I believe) Enterprise series. They reworked the theme song (still abhorrent, less mass murder inducing), mostly cut out the decontamination, and got an interesting plot that is reminiscent of the Babylon 5 twists and turns. Quite enjoying it so far.
From my memory of DNA (hazy) there are areas that are roughly analogous to both hardware and software within a single strand (counters vs. amino folders for instance).
The OSS principles apply to both hardware and software and hence to wetware(sic) as well.
David Suzuki in his book Genethics makes the point that we can already target genetic signatures with manufactured viruses. Hence a race specific pathogen could be created and spread without (too much) fear of it turning on it's creators.
Slashdot Mirror
To quote from youre website: "Unlike him, she accepted the responsiblity of eating wisely from their menu, and ended up losing weight and having her cholesterol go down. "
i.e. She, unlike 95% of customers, ate the "healthy options".
Q.
Q.
My favourite:
Q.
Don't get me wrong, logically speaking you are certainly correct. Unfortunately MS relies on a strategy of remaining incompatible and anticompetitive...
Q.
Even then a lot of businesses may actually save money through reducing bandwidth costs due to spam. I hope they don't force those savings onto you... :)
Q.
Q.
That would be the 9 millimeter I presume...
Q.
Q.
We are fully in agreement, but prefer logical games over actual dry communication. That's the tech mindset in a lot of ways really - enjoying the mental stimulation for it's own sake. :)
Q.
It may just be a matter or filtration/distillation but they of course increase the energy required to produce the fuel...
Q.
Semantic interpretation aside, I was trying to address the original post "Exactly how is this news for nerds? I understand that the prevailing opinion on Slashdot is hatred for the Bush administration, but I fail to see the 'nerd' aspect to this story. Politics aside, if it was a sci/fi or fantasy movie, I could understand, but this was simply a politically charged documentary about 9/11 and the Iraq war. What is next? Reviews of campaign ads?"
So I guess to use your AND example: /.?? Or should /. be reserved for news items that are: ("News for nerds") AND NOT ("News for non-Nerds")
An item of news is: ("News for nerds") AND ("News for non-Nerds").
Should it be on
That was my original question. I know my thoughts, any news that is of interest to our geek demographic should be posted. Be they political, scientific, technological, artistic, etc, etc. This is the inclusive OR belief.
Q.
If required they can also set a spam level on the mail server in a MySQL user/account database to automatically delete mail over the specified threshold (for accounts receiving oodles of obvious spam).
It has a nice balance between performance, security, and leaving most of the control in the hands of the users. We haven't faced extreme loads but it hasn't even raised an eyebrow over the load so far. Most importantly, no unhappy usres complaining of missing emails...
Q.
Dead as dead can be.
It killed off all the Romans,
and now it's killing me."
- Allegedly etched on a desk in a classroom.
Q.
Q.
Which is it: News which is exclusively of interest to nerds, or news which is of interest to a group including nerds. Exclusive or inclusive logical OR.
I'll understand that a lot better than Omlette Analogies... Q. :)
Then along came Enterprise with it's complete lack of plot (don't worry, we'll have another "decontamination scene") and a theme song that, that, that... it almost defies description.
The way I see it, it could be used as a grounds for a justifiable homicide defense in a murder trial. Really. It is so bad it should be declared a Weapon of Mass Destruction. It makes Ipecac syrup seem like a mild regurgitant. I would rather stab out my ears with sharpened chopsticks, than voluntarily listen to it again. This song is so bad it makes you envious of the deaf - I'm pretty deaf in one ear all ready (damn chopsticks, lucky I only had one) but it keeps getting in the other one, dammit.
Then, after all that I got sucked into the current (third I believe) Enterprise series. They reworked the theme song (still abhorrent, less mass murder inducing), mostly cut out the decontamination, and got an interesting plot that is reminiscent of the Babylon 5 twists and turns. Quite enjoying it so far.
Q (/cathartic)
Q.
Q.
CD of Fire?
Now what was that song called...
Much better than the meat puppet version I think - like hendrix's version of All Along the Watchtower...
Q.
Q
Q.
The OSS principles apply to both hardware and software and hence to wetware(sic) as well.
Q.
Q.
This is not 50 years in the future - this is now.
Q.
It is possible that it is "hard wired" enough to be invariant, but given the adaptability of most higher order animals I would highly doubt it.
Q.