Slashdot Mirror


McDonald's and Sony Offer Music Downloads

J ROC writes "CNet reports that McDonalds and Sony are teaming up to offer free music downloads to customers who buy a Big Mac Extra Value Meal. The offer, which begins on June 8, offers customers an access code to download one free song at Sony's Connect online music store. Hmmm, let's see, about 600 calories in a Big Mac, an average of 12 songs on a CD, so that's about 7200 calories you will need to consume in order to get an album's worth of music (and I'm not including the calories from the fries and softdrink). Does this offer also include a free gym membership?"

446 comments

  1. The gym membership by LeBlanc_Joey · · Score: 5, Funny

    The free gym membership comes with the triple bypass.

    --

    Everything in moderation, even moderation.

    No, especially moderation.

    1. Re:The gym membership by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also known as the Bypass McTriple, for a limited time only $49,875.00

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:The gym membership by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, it's only 7200 calories. That's only equal to about a bag of fritos and a tub of lard to dip them in. Most of us eat that on our lunch break, especially with non-diet coke being about 220 calories a can, and twinkies so small and tasty. Mmmmmmm. Lard.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:The gym membership by mirko · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's one kilogram of raw fat stored : in volume, this is more than a liter.
      This is really serious, guys, you should watch this, then read this.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:The gym membership by NightCreature · · Score: 1

      First off, there is hardly any music worth downloading nowadays. Secondly I will not sacrifice my health for some cheesy song by Spears. But most people are gullible enough to sacrifice their health for music, so all I can do is send these naive folks my deepest condolences.

    5. Re:The gym membership by Satan+Dumpling · · Score: 1

      Actually a 12oz can of Coke is 140 calories :)

    6. Re:The gym membership by mrwonton · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they just have a card you get punched, and every 50 big macs you get a free liposuction?

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    7. Re:The gym membership by mirko · · Score: 1

      The guy who modded me down might be an hopeless fathead...
      Come on, there's hope, you can lose that lardbelly !

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  2. Fat people with headphones fetish by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Can I supersize that?

  3. What happened by Mz6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought McDonald's was supposed to start promoting it's more healthier meals now? What's the point of tying that to a Big Mac extra value meal? They should put it with their healthier stuff to spark up sales of that since that's where their business looks to be heading...

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:What happened by afidel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Especially since the active people more attracted to the "healthy" meals are more likely to have a portable mp3 player for exercising.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:What happened by dustmote · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've noticed they have commercials for salads. Is anyone going to McDonald's for salads? I don't think it's going to be a strong selling point. Of course, I don't pretend to have my finger on the pulse of the consumer mindset, so I could well be wrong. Still, when I think McDonald's, I don't think salad. Or healthy. (or food, for that matter)

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    3. Re:What happened by DroopyStonx · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is actually a mass murder/genocide plot by the RIAA. Kill/poison "the problem" and it goes away, right?

      In this case, destroy all the evil music downloaders (or as the RIAA calls them, "freeloaders") with greasy fast food. How dare they ruin their overpriced music dreams!

      This whole "online musical revolution" thing has been a thorn in their side for too long and they are ready to DO something!

      Think ABOUT IT, man!

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    4. Re:What happened by cheide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt anybody really thinks to themselves "Hey, I've got a hankering for a good salad. Where's the nearest McDonald's?"

      It's probably more like "Ugh, I'm sick of the neighbourhood Subway, but the only other place open and/or nearby is a McDonald's. Damn. Well, what's the *least* horrible thing on the menu..."

    5. Re:What happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When I think McDonalds, I think convenience. Then I think, what the fuck can eat here that won't kill me? Then I think salad. Or grilled chicken, no mayo.

    6. Re:What happened by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're trying to kill the music downloaders. That's the first thing that jumped into my head when I saw the headline...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    7. Re:What happened by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

      But the active people are much less likely to sit on their asses for hours at a time perusing a bunch of song titles deciding which one they want for free.

      And active people eat Big Mac's too. They just dont eat 3 of them at a sitting every day.

      And if you think eating 3 of McD's taco salads instead will make you thin and attractive, you're a moron.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:What happened by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to rain on the joke... but making people fat would only keep them INDOORS, behind a computer screen downloading music. Therefore, if RIAA would be behind it they have made a terrible choice in presenting it.

      --
      Hmmm.
    9. Re:What happened by afidel · · Score: 1

      You obviously missed the quotes around "healthy"! Just because it's served over a bed of lettuce does not make anything at McD's healthy. Btw I know about being active and eating a lot of calories, I used to be on swim team. We would swim 5+ miles a day and consume around 5,000 calories a day. Though I rarely at crap like McDonalds, it was more like massive servings of spagheti with heavy meat sauce.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:What happened by andreMA · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the idea of the RIAA shooting themselves in the foot is simply preposterous. Wait a second...

    11. Re:What happened by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You could also say that the less active people attracted to the Big Mac meals are more likely to have a desktop computer with Winamp, so I don't really think you have a valid point.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    12. Re:What happened by isthisthingon · · Score: 2, Funny

      What happened is someone in marketing at Mickey D's has just figured out the term "bundling".

      Just when we thought we'd taught our kid siblings and parents not to download the cute smileys because they'd get stuff they didn't want, the marketing team at Mc D's comes along and figures out how to bundle music with Big Macs.

      Come to think of it, some might call it "reverse bundling", but sheesh! when is the insanity going to end?!

      software salesperson to customer: "Ooh! You must be excited, Mr. Customer, what free new car would you like to select as a bonus with your purchase of Windows 2020?"

      "Huh? Uh, new car? I just want my computer to stop crashing. And what's with this thing called "The eWallet 2020?"

      --
      And then one day you find, ten years have gone behind you....
    13. Re:What happened by Bl33d4merican · · Score: 1

      Hah! Try telling that to all the overweight, mp3 touting nerds on slashdot!

      --

      Every windows user is a sadomasochist.

    14. Re:What happened by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      I doubt anybody really thinks to themselves "Hey, I've got a hankering for a good salad. Where's the nearest McDonald's?"

      Or more like when they're in the mood for a salad, they look around and usually they will see on the road a McDonalds. And for people who have family and friends that decide to go eat a Big Mac, this health conscience person knows that he/she has an option.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    15. Re:What happened by DrCode · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Judging by their commercials, they're promoting their 'healthy' food to the 30-something female crowd, probably trying to encourage moms to give in to their kids' demands to go there.

      The free downloads would appeal more to people in their teens, and they aren't the ones worried so much about fat and calories.

    16. Re:What happened by j0e_average · · Score: 3, Funny

      Promoting healthy diets is in vogue. Talking about heathy diets is in vogue. Actually eating a healthy diet....well, that's another story.

    17. Re:What happened by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      what you'd do with a portable _MP3_ player combined with sonys crapstore?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    18. Re:What happened by douthat · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, people touting portable mp3 players, that are non-sony branded, are shit out of luck, too.

      Check it, from connect.com's EULA: (emphasis mine)
      Permitted Uses:
      You may play the Connect Downloads an unlimited number of times on up to three (3) personal computers that are registered with the Connect store, including the personal computer on which the Connect Downloads are originally downloaded. Once downloaded to that personal computer, you may transfer the licensed Connect Downloads an unlimited number of times to portable music devices and media (except for WMG's Content, which may be transferred to up to three (3) different portable devices) that read the OpenMG DRM such as the HiMD, the Net MD, and the Memory Stick media. You may not thereafter transfer, copy or export (or the like) such Connect Download from one such device to another, or to any media of any kind without maintaining the OpenMGDRM. In addition, you may also "burn" up to a total of ten (10), (up to five (5) permanent copies of the Connect Downloads in compressed form in the Atrac3 codec encrypted and protected by the OpenMG DRM and up to five (5) Redbook CDs, (except for UMG's content, which may be burned to at least ten (10) Redbook CDs)), to either blank recordable CD-R compact discs or blank recordable CD-RW compact discs (i.e., a physical, non-interactive record configuration that conforms to either (i) in the case of CD-Rs, the so-called "Orange Book Part II" technical specification for "write once" compact discs or (ii) in the case of CD-RWs, the so-called "Orange Book Part III" technical specification for "re-writable" compact discs). Any burning or transferring capabilities of the Connect Downloads are solely an accommodation to you and shall not constitute a grant or waiver (or other limitation or implication) of any rights of the copyright owners of the sound recording and underlying musical composition embodied in the Connect Download.
      Non-Permitted Uses:
      Any use of the sound recordings as embodied in the Connect Download other than as permitted above is a violation of the copyright in such sound recording under applicable laws, and is prohibited. Except as expressly permitted in the "Permitted Uses" section above, you may not reproduce, distribute or transfer the Connect Downloads, in any format. For example, you may not: (i) transfer the Connect Downloads to anyone else; (ii) register more than 3 computers with the Connect store at any one time; (iii) copy or transfer the Connect Downloads to more than the number of portable music devices expressly permitted in the "Permitted Uses" section above; (iv) "burn" more than ten (10) copies of any particular Connect Download to blank recordable compact disc; or (v) copy or transfer the Connect Downloads to any storage device or blank media not specifically authorized in the "Permitted Uses" section above. In addition, you may not reverse engineer, transcode, decompile, translate, adapt, modify, disassemble or otherwise tamper with the Content, or the software, or circumvent any technology designed to enforce these Limitations on Use. You further agree that you will not attempt to modify the software or the Usage Rules for any reason whatsoever, including for the purpose of disguising or changing ownership of the Content.

      If you don't know, NetMD and HiMD are MiniDisc formats from Sony, and Memory Stick is Sonly's proprietary memory format. Oh yeah, and OpenMG is Sony's proprietary DRM software.


      I don't know about you, but this doesn't sit well in my stomach..
      ...but then again, neither would a big mac and fries :-P
      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
    19. Re:What happened by Patlag · · Score: 0

      a 12 years old girl has been charged for 3 million$ because she shared her fries...

    20. Re:What happened by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2

      Yes - I've been going to McDonald for the salads - The ceaser salad is Well, made, and includes a grilled chicken breast that's spiced nicely. The salad is also enough for a full meal so don't get any addons.

      BTW - Blaming McDonalds for people getting obese, is like Blaming the gun for murdering folks. There's a thing called "personal responsibility" - if more folks took it upon themselves we'd all be better off.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    21. Re:What happened by bored_SuSE_user · · Score: 1

      Does it actually have anything stopping you from doing all that? If they are just MP3s then surely you can play them in any computer you want....?? How exactly do you "register" a computer with them anyway? Presumably they are not MP3s and require a proprietry player to read them?!

      --
      Bored? http://www.dodgybloke.co.uk
    22. Re:What happened by Patik · · Score: 1

      Sony's music doesn't play in Winamp, it's made for their portable player.

    23. Re:What happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually as a mcdonalds employee i can say that the salads are pretty popular not nearly as popular as double cheeseburgers but still very popular

    24. Re:What happened by dougman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't find any links right now, but I recently read that only 1-2% of their sales are from the "healthy food" product line. I suppose you could view this as a way for McDonalds to promote their healthy stuff, but since Sony is the one paying for the advertising here, I'm sure they want to get their message on the product that falls into the 98% category.

    25. Re:What happened by platypussrex · · Score: 1

      I'm by no means a McDonalds fan, but I have to agree about the new salads. They actually have "real" lettuce (meaning a variety of types, not just iceberg) and if you get the non-breaded chicken and the low-cal dressing, you can have the whole thing for about 300 kCal. Not a gourmet meal but if you are stuck eating there it beats the heck out of the other choices.

    26. Re:What happened by Ancient+Devices+King · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's cuz their new "healthier" menu isn't any better than their old stuff. Some of their new salads have as many calories and fat as a Big Mac. They actually add sugar to the salads (not the dressing, the salads) to make them taste better. Might as well eat the Big Mac and get some protein!

      --
      -"It seems like you're trying to exploit a security hole. Would you like help?"
    27. Re:What happened by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      McDonalds needs to forget the health food thing. I'm sick of dumbass fat slobs suing McDonalds because they can't read a nutrition chart.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    28. Re:What happened by douthat · · Score: 1
      Does it actually have anything stopping you from doing all that? If they are just MP3s then surely you can play them in any computer you want....?? How exactly do you "register" a computer with them anyway? Presumably they are not MP3s and require a proprietry player to read them?!
      they are not mp3s. they are in sony's ATRAC format. you register a computer by downloading the software from their website and creating an account. this desktop proprietary, alongside their proprietary portables, is what will not sit well with most users
      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
    29. Re:What happened by nuklearfusion · · Score: 1
      I thought McDonald's was supposed to start promoting it's more healthier meals now? What's the point of tying that to a Big Mac extra value meal?

      Maybe, when this promo is over, they'll do the pedomater(sp?) thing with bigMac meals, too.

      --

      There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots.

  4. The first song I'm getting by thedogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Is the two-all beef patties song. Imagine playin that while rockin' down the highway.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:The first song I'm getting by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, no, no, not that song. How about the "I'll take a Big Mac, McBLT, a quarter pounder with some cheese, filet-a-fish, a hamburder, a cheeseburger, a Happy meal....". I can't remember the rest. No one ever seems to remember that promotion.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    2. Re:The first song I'm getting by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Ronald MacDonald Sings Britney Spears' Greatest Hits!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:The first song I'm getting by gowen · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think you mean

      Big Mac, McBLT, a Quarter Pounder with some cheese,
      Filet-O-Fish, a hamburger, a cheeseburger, a Happy Meal, McNuggets, tasty golden French Fries,regular or larger sizes,
      salads, Chef or Garden or a Chicken Salad Oriental, big big breakfast, Egg McMuffin, hot Hotcakes and Sausage,
      maybe Biscuits, Bacon, Egg and Cheese, a sausage, Danish, Hash Browns, too,
      and for dessert, hot Apple Pies, and sundaes, three varieties, a soft serve cone, three kind of shakes, and chocolaty-chip cookies, and to drink, a Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, an orange drink and
      Sprite, and Coffee, decaf too, a lowfat milk, also an orange juice, I love McDonalds, good time great taste, and I get this all at one place.
      I'll get my coat...
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    4. Re:The first song I'm getting by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oops, I Ate it Again?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    5. Re:The first song I'm getting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About a year after THAT song came out, the backwards version came out which is the one I remember. Damn I'm old. I think we're talking mid 1970s.

      Bun seed sesame a on onions pickles cheese lettuce sauce special patties beef all two.

      TDz.

    6. Re:The first song I'm getting by CommanderTaco · · Score: 1

      mcnuggets, tasty golden french fries, regular or larger size, big big breakfast, ...
      that's where my memory taps out.

    7. Re:The first song I'm getting by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      If you did that from memory, you deserve a +1, Scary moderation.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    8. Re:The first song I'm getting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like the song where they sing everything on the menu. I don't know the song anymore but when I was a kid I'm pretty sure I somehow got a record of that song somehow.

      Not sure what happened to it though, I don't recall seeing it in my collection last time I went through them. My sister may have taken it or we might have tossed it. It wasn't that great of a song.

    9. Re:The first song I'm getting by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      That was the promotion. They had a whole class that would sing the song and if they got all the way through the song on the record you had, then you won something. I'm sure there are tons of web pages dedicated to the subject, but I'm too lazy to find it.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    10. Re:The first song I'm getting by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      Or what about Wesley Willis - Rock & Roll McDonalds?

      "McDonalds sells quarter pounders, they will put pounds on you. ROCK AND ROLL MCDONALDS!"

    11. Re:The first song I'm getting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.x-entertainment.com/pics4/mcmenu.ra

  5. Want fries with that? by llamaguy · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I think I'll take an extra portion of 50 Cent, some D12, and maybe some Boybands in there too. Oh yeah, and an extra large drink.

    --
    HAH! I just wasted a second of your life making you read this, but I wasted a minute of mine thinking it up. DAMN.
    1. Re:Want fries with that? by Alzheimers · · Score: 4, Funny

      But which will kill you first -- the food, or the music?

  6. special sauce by ctour · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd rather pay the 99 cents and get it off iTunes, besides... I don't touch anything with "special sauce".

    1. Re:special sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey,

      'Rodeo clowns' by (G Love and Special Sauce) is in my playlist right now, as a matter of fact.

    2. Re:special sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd rather pay the 99 cents and get it off iTunes, besides... I don't touch anything with "special sauce".

      So, you're a woman?

    3. Re:special sauce by Chundra · · Score: 1

      I'd rather pay nothing and get it somewhere else. Besides, with all that money I save I can go get a sack full of filet-o-fish sadwiches. Mmmm.

  7. Re: McDonald's ...Offers Music Downloads by manavendra · · Score: 1

    Is that with fries?

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  8. How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not do that instead?

    Clown. Hamburger. That combination alone is bizzare. Now we're supposed to think Clown+Hamburger+MP3 is sane?

    1. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      I don't think Clown+ is sane.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    2. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      Damn you /. for eating my quotes.
      Second Attempt

      I don't think Clown+<Anything/> is sane.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "I don't think Clown+ is sane."

      Obviously you have never experienced the "joys" of Clown++.

    4. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by wass · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yeah, I never really understood all those mcdonalds mascots.

      You've got ronald mcdonald, a scurvy-ridden freak who's the prime representative of mcdonalds to the public. He's got major nutritional problems, besides his chalky-white face he's got bright-red hair and eye problems. Kind of like Joker when he fell into the vat of acid. Makes you want to think twice before biting into that cheeseburger, doesn't it?

      Then you've got grimace, who's name is a synonym for making a face like you just ate something nasty. Actually, merriam-webster gives this definition : "a facial expression usually of disgust or disapproval" And what kind of mutant blob is he supposed to be? How many big macs did his mom eat while she was pregnant, to mutate him so much?

      Fry-guys. Okay, so the french fries there don't even come from potatoes but from some obscure animal lifeform. Are they driven to extinction? Maybe they're last remaining hideout is in some corners of the Amazon rainforest. Or are they a collection of fries that, due to the toxic chemicals they're made from, suddently acquired a collective concious. Hmmm.

      And the hamburgler. Yup, eating at mcdonalds makes you so addicted you resort to stealing to be able to get your next big-mac fix.

      Seriously, what a bunch of weird-ass characters to represent a company. They are like their own X-Men or similar.

      --

      make world, not war

    5. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the fries aren't bad, but I refuse to eat more than 3 or 4 as a snack

      (that's 3 or 4 fries, not bags)

    6. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by whovian · · Score: 1

      It's common for manufacturers to put cutesy characters on their products for marketing purposes, probably to appeal to kids, who aren't that food conscious. This glosses over the fact that the nutrition of the "food" is, for the most part, sacrificed in favor of flavor. Just look at all those sugary cereals.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    7. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      "Now we're supposed to think clown+Hamburger+MP3 is sane?"

      First time I read that, I thought it said, "clown+Hamburger+mp5."

      I imagined a clown brandishing a automatic firearm after consuming a mad-cow tainted burger. Sane? I think not...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    8. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by king-manic · · Score: 1

      On the subject of flavor, I've always found Mcdonalds lacked any. Their burgers are fine but I hate their fries. Too wispy and taste like MSG in stick form. Their Chicken nuggets tastes liek bits of cardboard with some batter. Their ice cream (or semi-dairy treat) tatstes liek sugar and lard mixed with some vanilla (problably is).

      I ussually wonder down to the local Joey Tomatoes and have a nice burger while I oggle the door girls on the patio and sip a cold glass of whiskey. There's a franchise I can support. Hot girls, Decent Food, alchohol. The $30 tab is the only real problem.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    9. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the fry guys. Frylock would kick their asses.

    10. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by FryGuy1013 · · Score: 1

      Fry-Guy's still exist :)

      --
      bananas like monkeys.
    11. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      I prefer Shakes McJunkie and the Hammurder. Stabble stabble stabble!

    12. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Too wispy and taste like MSG in stick form.

      That's funny... MSG has no taste.

      And OMFG... I was just at Joey's for an extended lunch today. Wow. Wow. I'd pay to live in a closet there, with no internet connection even. Wow.

    13. Re:How about a fucking hamburger that tastes good. by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1
      I believe Grimace is a tastebud.

  9. They did make an Adult Happy meal by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 1

    With a pace counter, salad, water bottle and everything! That would be funnier if I was kidding.

    --
    I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    1. Re:They did make an Adult Happy meal by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      With a pace counter, salad, water bottle and everything! That would be funnier if I was kidding.

      Hey now! I'll have you know that my wife loves her Stepometer! She's always checking it after going for a run. And do you know the pain I had to go through to get it?! The drive-thru people didn't put it in her "adult meal", so I had to drive all the way back and wrangle it out of them!

      Oops. Did I just say that out loud?

    2. Re:They did make an Adult Happy meal by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 2, Funny
      The drive-thru people didn't put it in her "adult meal", so I had to drive all the way back and wrangle it out of them!

      Wouldn't it have done you more good to run back to the place?

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    3. Re:They did make an Adult Happy meal by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it have done you more good to run back to the place?

      Believe it or not, it was raining that day. And to be perfectly honest, I was already pissed about the pizza guy who never arrived. We had ordered a pizza from our favorite pizza joint, but their new driver was such a f***up that he couldn't find a friggin' high rise building along one of the best known highways in the Chicago Loop area. Even after I gave the guy EXPLICIT instructions, he STILL couldn't find the place. So, with two hungry kids waiting, I told the pizza place that their driver was worthless and I went and got McDonald's drive-thru. As you might imagine, I was NOT happy that they forgot the walking gizmo.

    4. Re:They did make an Adult Happy meal by ack154 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I keep seeing that commercial for the new happy meal with the "step counter" in it and that stupid woman walking up the steps while her friend takes the elevator.

      Like we're supposed to believe that just because McDonald's gave her a stupid step counter, that she's not going to be lazy and take the elevator.

      Come on... you know she took the elevator.

    5. Re:They did make an Adult Happy meal by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Like we're supposed to believe that just because McDonald's gave her a stupid step counter, that she's not going to be lazy and take the elevator.

      Ok, lesson 101 about women. Many of them are obsessed with their weight (especially those in a big city) and will do just about anything to stay slim. In fact, many push this obsession to near anorexia. If you give one of these women a Stepometer (the McD's name for a pedometer), she will do a lot of strange things to increase the number of steps it shows.

    6. Re:They did make an Adult Happy meal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, sometimes it's really hard living in America.

    7. Re:They did make an Adult Happy meal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, in Sudan, the ethnic cleansing continues...

  10. One hell of a weight gain program by emorphien · · Score: 1

    That would be the most fattening CD ever.

    I really don't think people would be buying their greaseburgers just to download a song.

    --


    Presently here, but not there.
  11. Sony's format sucks... by Otto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sony's Connect store is the one only offering the ATRAC3 format files, which is only compatible with Sony players.

    I admit that iTunes is only offering DRM Protected AAC, which is almost as bad, but at least AAC has a pretty high quality. By comparison, ATRAC3 sounds like you're hearing the music through a tube. Not to mention that ATRAC3 has some of the worst DRM and restrictive software I've ever seen.. You have to check music into and out of your portable player device, I believe. It's just wacky as hell.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Sony's format sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The checkin / checkout procedure does not always work either. I have a MD player, and if you do not have MP3/CD backups of ATRAC files, you will eventually lose much of your music collection when there is a glitch. Three copies is all Sony permits you to make, which is not enough.

    2. Re:Sony's format sucks... by Alsee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly.

      For the 12 billionth time, who the hell wants a crippled product, even if it *is* "free". Yipee! I have my regular music collection PLUS 4 "free" crippled songs! When I want to play any of those 4 songs I am required to switch to a different crippled music player! Yipee!

      I'll stick with Winamp and shuffleplay ALL of my non-crippled files at once thankyouverymuch.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Sony's format sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony has completely and utterly missed the boat with digital music. From what I've heard, they're pulled in two directions: their hardware group wants to make cool stuff to listen to MP3s; their content-producing side (Sony Records, Sony Films) want super-strong DRM. So, they're late to market with everything, and what they do come out with sucks. I can't believe their brand still retains the status it does.

    4. Re:Sony's format sucks... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Well, if I could listen to the free music on my computer, I might give it a try ... except for one thing: My computer's a Mac. I understand you can listen to it on your computer if you use Windows, and if you use their (apparently ugly) proprietary player. Does anyone have firsthand knowledge of it? My only source of information is a pro-Mac site and they understandably trashed it.

      Since I hate McDonalds food (it all tastes like cardboard to me), this is less than relevent, I suppose. I did try switching to Pepsi for a while for the iTunes contest, but unfortunately I don't like Pepsi in bottles at all, so that didn't work for me.

      I think the Pepsi contest was a better idea because soft drink consumption is a lot more frequent than fast food consumption, at least for me. I'll drink a Coke at every meal, but won't consume a Big Mac at every meal, so the odds have to be pretty good for people to win.

      I really liked the Pepsi promotion a lot and I was sorry it didn't do better (because I would have enjoyed seeing it run again). McDonalds is a lot less compelling. But then again, I hate their food anyway ...

      D

    5. Re:Sony's format sucks... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I admit that iTunes is only offering DRM Protected AAC, which is almost as bad, but at least AAC has a pretty high quality.

      You forgot to mention that the DRM that is there is also relatively simple to remove.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  12. McAlbums by Rufus88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Customer: I'll have a chocolate shake, Don Henley's Greatest Hits, and, ummmm, The Eagles Greatest Hits to go, please.

    McD: You want Frey's with that?

    1. Re:McAlbums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was this really worth the effort of typing?

      I hate being penalized by /. for knowing how to type.

    2. Re:McAlbums by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't much effort, since I type pretty well. If you think otherwise, perhaps you just didn't get it.

    3. Re:McAlbums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE
      Jesus, man, can you change the station?

      DRIVER
      Fuck you man! You don't like my fucking music, get your own fucking cab!

      DUDE
      I've had a--

      DRIVER
      I pull over and kick your ass out, man!

      DUDE
      --had a rough night, and I hate the fucking Eagles, man--

      DRIVER
      That's it! Outta this fucking cab!

    4. Re:McAlbums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take it easy. Don't let the sound of your mouse wheel drive you crazy.

    5. Re:McAlbums by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      First Rule about Slashdot: Don't feed the trolls.

      I found your joke pretty funny...anything that makes me smile in the middle of the working day was worthwhile. Don't worry about ACs in future...they're only here to boost the web advert impressions.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    6. Re:McAlbums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the first guy was right. Everyone gets it and it was very, very, very stupid.

    7. Re:McAlbums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the only disappointing part of that entire movie. The Eagles are awesome, but so is the Dude. Who to side with? Oh, the dilemas...

  13. More? by BigglesZX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sigh, not _yet another_ incentive for kids to eat unhealthy garbage and get fat. McD's could get better kudos by only offering it with "healthy" things like salad.

    But wait, they don't *do* healthy things.

    --

    $ mv *.sig >/dev/null
    1. Re:More? by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 1

      And it gets worse. Notice the new "healthy" option for kids? Apple slices with caramel dip. I bet it's great with their deep-fried salad!

    2. Re:More? by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm tired of seeing everyone complaining about how it comes with the BigMac meal only. McDonald's is a BUSINESS. They will do as they like. If they want to promote thier less healthy (but possibly more profitable) foods, then they're free to do so! No one says you have to eat there. Save your $5 and buy 5 songs on iTunes.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    3. Re:More? by slash-tard · · Score: 1

      I prefer the sugar coated, deep fried, bacon wrapped cheese strips myself.

    4. Re:More? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of hearing/reading people complaining about people complaining - anyone has has the right the say that they want on this forum (to some degree), and you shouldn't be telling them to stop. So STFU and let people speak their minds for once.

    5. Re:More? by BigglesZX · · Score: 1

      Quite correct, they are a business. But US authorities still say "our populace is too fat" and yet continue to allow businesses like MacDonalds to sell sub-standard foods that contribute to this national trend.

      The line has to be drawn somewhere. Fine, let them sell their food. But at least stop them enticing kids into eating it by offering free music.

      --

      $ mv *.sig >/dev/null
    6. Re:More? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Salad isn't nessacarily healthy. A 200 calorie salad + a 900 calorie dressing = not so healthy, plus they put somehting liek deep fried chicken breast on top of that salad for another 400 calories.

      (*all value approximate. accurate to within +- 2000 callories).

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    7. Re:More? by zgornz · · Score: 1

      In Super Size Me, they talk about how McDonalds tries to make kids have such happy memorizes of the place that when they are adults they return to try to get that happy feeling again (hence the hamster tubes and the toys and the clowns). And so the main character of Super Size Me said that thats why when he has kids he's going to punch them in the face every time they drive by a McDonalds.

    8. Re:More? by plasm4 · · Score: 1

      Our government has no authority over how healthy McDonalds is. Allowing them to sell substandard food doesn't even enter into it. If you're a fat ass, then its your own fault, although it is easier to pass the blame to someone else instead of taking responsibility for yourself.

    9. Re:More? by BigglesZX · · Score: 1

      Good job I'm in perfect shape then. And not American. And not a MacDonalds customer. :-)

      --

      $ mv *.sig >/dev/null
    10. Re:More? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I wrote "you're" I didn't intend to direct that at you, if that makes any sense.

    11. Re:More? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Quite correct, they are a business. But US authorities still say "our populace is too fat" and yet continue to allow businesses like MacDonalds to sell sub-standard foods that contribute to this national trend.

      Last time I checked, the government wasn't in a position to allow or disallow businesses and their customers from engaging in transactions that do neither of them harm. Maybe you've heard of the Constitution...more specifically, maybe you've heard of its 10th Amendment and how it keeps Uncle Sam from micromanaging your life (or would, if the nanny-state leftists hadn't abused the commerce clause to beat the 10th Amendment into nothingness).

      Nobody's forced to eat at McD's. Nobody's forced to eat rabbit food, either. I'd rather leave people free to make their own decisions about what to eat (among other things). If you won't tell me I can't eat my steaks and burgers (the latter of which I rarely get at McD's, FWIW), I won't tell you you can't eat your rabbit food.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:More? by BigglesZX · · Score: 1

      Public Health Authority? We have one of those.

      --

      $ mv *.sig >/dev/null
  14. Required reading by tji · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before buying any more fast food, check out Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser. I'm reading it right now, it has lots of interesting information about the fast food industry that might effect your desire for their food.

    Of course there is also Super Size Me the movie about the guy who ate nothing but McDonald's for a month & the effects on his body. I haven't seen it yet (I'm waiting to finish "Fast Food Nation" first) but I hear it's good.

    1. Re:Required reading by crustymonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I went and saw SuperSize me last Saturday. Fantastic documentary, I highly recommend it. Just seeing the guy launch his supersized double quarter pounder meal out the window of his car makes it worth seeing.

      --
      \033:wq!
    2. Re:Required reading by Slick_Snake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're so worried about how unhealthy it is then don't eat it. People are so wrapped up in blaming others for their faults that they don't see the truth. No one is forcing you to eat 1000+ calorie meals. You make the choice and you have to live with the consequences.

    3. Re:Required reading by Mikkeles · · Score: 1
      'Just seeing the guy launch his supersized double quarter pounder meal out the window of his car makes it worth seeing.'

      Er, was this before or after eating it?

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    4. Re:Required reading by Gildor · · Score: 1

      Haven't read Fast Food Nation yet, although I've heard about some of the information in it second hand...very disturbing.

      Also haven't seen "Supersize Me", but didn't the guy basically *try* to eat the most unhealthy things on the menu? Soso Whaley did a similar study and got far different results. She lost weight and her cholesterol went down.

    5. Re:Required reading by MikeOttawa · · Score: 1
      I too read Fast Food Nation. I haven't yet gone to see Supersize Me (it opens here tonight).

      Have you reached the chapter in Fast Food Nation where the author visits an abattoir? It prompted me to start buying organic beef. In fact a local Burger joint here has started offering organic beef burgers (for a $2.39CDN premium). But hey - someone's got to create a demand. If people started buying more organic meats, the price would probably drop.

    6. Re:Required reading by quinkin · · Score: 1
      He was eating everything at least once in the month of filming.

      To quote from youre website: "Unlike him, she accepted the responsiblity of eating wisely from their menu, and ended up losing weight and having her cholesterol go down. "

      i.e. She, unlike 95% of customers, ate the "healthy options".

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    7. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck is "Soso Whaley", and why should I believe her? While I agree that people need more personal responsability, being a mindlessly pro-corporate idiot isn't the way to do it. And besides, she was probably fat already. Anyone who eats McDonalds for a month must be ugly anyway, so who cares?

    8. Re:Required reading by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, whilst nice in theory that is just wishful thinking. Not everyone has the critical thinking skills to understand the power that advertising has on them - and to be honest even those of us who are fully aware of it are still not immune.

      Human nature is still very much ruled by subconscious effects and people like Mickey D's spend hundreds of millions a year to tune into those effects.
      As an example, an Australian study found that just over half of Australian 9 and 10 year-olds think that Ronald McDonald knows best what is good for children to eat.

    9. Re:Required reading by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Read the book...Coca Cola and Pepsi and Burger King striking deals with elementary schools, selling kids Whoppers for lunch in the cafeteria (hey the school sells it, it must be good for me!). As adults we take responsibility, but the book doesn't hide its disgust as the industry preys on kids, all while school administrators look the other way because the school gets badly needed cash.

      The author of Fast Food Nation actually says many times that he likes fast food, but the system that produces your meal at McDonalds depends on horrible things - the cheapest meat quality (you don't want to know what they feed cattle - it includes dead animals from the shelters OK now I told you), the mistreated illegal immigrants cutting your beef in horrible conditions, etc.

      Not all fast food is bad, that's the other part of the book - learn from In and Out Burger - fast food can be tasty and socially responsible, and cheap at the same time. One of the best books I ever read.

    10. Re:Required reading by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Have you reached the chapter in Fast Food Nation where the author visits an abattoir? It prompted me to start buying organic beef. In fact a local Burger joint here has started offering organic beef burgers (for a $2.39CDN premium). But hey - someone's got to create a demand. If people started buying more organic meats, the price would probably drop.

      I only buy organic meats too. I can't seem to digest any other kind. I tried silicon-based, but it didn't work. Then I tried tin and lead-based, still no go. So it was back to plain ol' carbon-based for me.

    11. Re:Required reading by Slick_Snake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those are 9 and 10 year olds, but its the parents who buy the food. How many parents really think that McDonalds is good for you?

    12. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not eaten a any type of beef burger or sandwich from a fast food place for almost 5 years. I have eaten a roast beef sandwich from Arby's a few times and got a grilled chicken breast sandwich from various places but nothing more.

    13. Re:Required reading by wass · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No one is forcing you to eat 1000+ calorie meals. You make the choice and you have to live with the consequences.

      You should see the movie because that's the whole point. Personally I can't stand fast food, and lately my girlfriend and I have been cooking most of our meals, avoiding processed foods, etc.

      But if you see the Supersize Me documentary, it shows you just how 'entrenched' our society is with all this fast-food and junk foods. The movie opens with a large group of little kids singing a song about pizza hut, kfc, and mcdonalds. It's more than just pop culture, fast food images are embedded into their heads through tv commercials, public school meal programs, and even summer-camp songs (as that song demonstrates).

      In the movie they talk with the lobby group (i forget the name) that represents mcdonalds and all the other huge multinational fast-food and other food companies. They have tons of power, and lobby the gubmint to pass favorable legislation for them, etc.

      Another point brought out by the movie is that this crappy food is so cheap that for many people it's what they depend on. And one really does have to go out of their way to avoid it completely (not just mcdonalds but all fast food and other questionable food companies like kraft, heinz, etc that load their foods w/ sugars/fats as well).

      --

      make world, not war

    14. Re:Required reading by Slick_Snake · · Score: 1
      When was the last time you ate "school food". The stuff is nasty and many kids would rather not eat lunch than to eat that stuff. School cafeterias were losing money and bring in outside food brought back some of that lost revenue. Which is worse kids eating fast food or not eating lunch and spending their money on candy and cokes?

      Again stop blaming other and take some responcibility. Parents who don't want their kids to eat it can make their lunch.

    15. Re:Required reading by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      As adults we take responsibility, but the book doesn't hide its disgust as the industry preys on kids, all while school administrators look the other way because the school gets badly needed cash.
      I think this says something about today's society. There are better ways to get cash than to sell your soul to the industry. IMO it seems like we're less and less social creatures. We've lost something through the decades, something that used to bind the people of a community together. In my oppinion it's not the industry we should be fighting, it's our social alienation that's the enemy.
      In the old days such a school administrator would have to answer painful questions of angry parents if they would pull off such a stunt, but on the other hand those parents would have been willing to help said school when needed.
      I guess this could be solved if parents, school administrators and teachers got back together again on the same side.
    16. Re:Required reading by tribulation2004 · · Score: 1

      A fair statement, but one of the inspirations for the movie was MacDonald's "part of a healthy lifestyle" advertising. The fast food industry spends millions a year on advertising to send out any message that will increase sales. Many people are very susceptible to advertising that is constantly repeated. Hearing the same message over and over tends to eventually convince people. "Fast Food Nation" in particular does an awesome job of showing how low the industry will sink to protect their sales. Lobbying for reduced safety inspections was particularly appalling to me in light of all the food scares in recent years. Incidentally, witness the recent spate of Atkins-related/carb-reduced advertising. How a company can advertise that melted cheese and bacon wraps are a healthy meal is beyond me. These people are scum who prey on ignorance to make a buck. I disagree with your statement about parents knowing better - they don't anymore, people "learn" too much about nutrition from advertising, parents and children both.

    17. Re:Required reading by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      People should take responsibility for what they do. However that doesn't mean that complaining about something is wrong. Of course there shouldn't be legislation telling people what to eat, however there is nothing wrong with a society discussing their unhealthy eating habits. Actually it's exactly that which enables people to make informed, responsible decisions. And why not suggest to a company to promote their more healthy options? Most companies listen to their customers at least some of the time. Sure they primarily want to make money, but often the best way to achieve that is by doing what the customer wants.

    18. Re:Required reading by onion_breath · · Score: 1

      If you're so worried about how unhealthy it is then don't eat it. People are so wrapped up in blaming others for their faults that they don't see the truth. No one is forcing you to eat 1000+ calorie meals. You make the choice and you have to live with the consequences.


      I agree wholeheartedly. McDonald's and other fast food vendors only exist because the public supports it with their hard earned dollars. Everyone likes to cry later about how it's everyone else's fault that they are out of shape and unsatisfied with their bodies... it's just childish scapegoating that's somehow gained enormous public approval and support. It's truly mind boggling.

      --
      this is my sig, be amazed.
    19. Re:Required reading by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1
      To be honest I think that there's plenty of parents who don't how bad for you a McDonalds is. I've nothing against a Big Mac (mmmmm, grease) but its what I would call a treat, like chocolate or chips, not a meal or part of any kind of healthy diet.

      I also knew you'd come back with the fact that it was children (that's not a dig, just a recognition) but the number is 50%, not one or two, so if you translate that down to adults you still have a large number who don't understand the nutritional value of a Big Mac and super size fries (did you know a child would have to run constantly for 3 1/2 hours to burn off the calories from one can of fizzy drink?). A 5% obesity rate is still a pretty big health problem for a country of 250 million (or even our 60 million here in the UK) - and not understanding the the nutritional value of an Extra Value Meal(tm) is a sure way to obesity. I'm not dissing the personal responsibility angle here - I'm a firm believer in it - but I'm just suggesting its not really an even battle, especially when you have poor, illeducated people (of which there are many) versus a multiple-hundreds of million dollar advertising budget.

    20. Re:Required reading by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      You don't talk to teachers enough - these kids's parents are irresponsible jerks, and I don't accept that kids should get screwed because they were unlucky enough to be born to bad parents. If all parents did their job this wouldn't be an issue. As the book (thats our topic) states, food doesn't have to be bad for you, not even fast food. And it can be cheap and good, and made in ways that don't harm society. The school cafeteria can make better food, they can get rid of the big macs and everyone wins. Right now kids are stuck between shit parents and shit school policies. The shit policies can be changed. The parents - that's a whole other issue.

    21. Re:Required reading by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is, we've been listening to this "personal responsibility" mantra of dieting for the last thirty years, and we just keep getting fatter and fatter. Is America's ever-expanding waistline prima facie evidence that we are simply making more and more irresponsible choices? It can be debated both ways, but I think there is a lot to be said for the idea that it is getting slowly harder to eat responsibly.

      This month's Time magazine has an excellent series of articles on obesity (subscription required). Some of the factors making it difficult to choose healthy lifestyles include:

      * Suburban sprawl leading to a lack of walkable communities.
      * Wide swaths of urban areas without convenient grocery stores, but with plenty of takeout.
      * High crime rates make it easier and safer to let kids veg out in front of the TV insead of sending them out to play.
      * Restaurants serving ever-larger portions.
      * A genetic predisposition, won through millions of years of evolution, to prefer high-fat and high-sugar foods.
      * The tendency by the fast food industry to take advantage of this genetic predisposition by increasing the fat and sugar content of their offerings.
      * Our country's overproduction of corn, leading to cheaper, fatter meat, and the use of high-fructose corn syrup in just about everything.
      * TV advertising targeting children. Personally, I consider it downright immoral to advertise anything to an eight year old who doesn't even understand that the point of advertising is to get him to want to buy something.
      * The relative ease and convenience of pre-packaged foods.

      I'm not denying that we need a strong boost in the personal responsibility department. But it's a complex problem, and repeating this mantra as a cure-all seems to be taking us in the wrong direction.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    22. Re:Required reading by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't seen the movie. I'm guessing it's not a bad documentary, but as a medical experiment, it seems somewhat lacking.

      The hook for the movie is that the guy tried an all fast-food diet for a month, and he blimped. Gained something like fifty pounds. But he was eating approximately 5000 calories a day. It doesn't really matter what form those calories take. I don't care if you're on Atkins, or a vegetarian, or eating an all snail diet: at 5000 calories a day, you're going to get supersized.

      Another documentary is coming out later this year, which involves someone eating nothing but fast food and losing weight, simply by keeping total calories in check. I think there's some Big Food cash sponsoring it, but it does make a good point: From a weight loss standpoint, the total number of calories consumed and burned makes a much bigger difference than the source of said calories.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    23. Re:Required reading by king-manic · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you ate "school food". The stuff is nasty and many kids would rather not eat lunch than to eat that stuff. School cafeterias were losing money and bring in outside food brought back some of that lost revenue. Which is worse kids eating fast food or not eating lunch and spending their money on candy and cokes?

      Eating healthy isn't hard. When I was growing up I ate a fairly traditional authetic chinese diet. Then the kids made fun of me for bringing rice and I begged my mom to make me sandwitched to stop the abuse at school. After A few years I came to really hate sandwitches.

      How do you people eat those things. Slimy, almost liquid bread with pieces of bland soft meat and random condiments and a few bits of veges most kids pick out. I hear it's not very good for you either, lunch meat is not very nutritious, the bread is high calory and has no nutrients. Still better then Mcdonalds.

      Cafeterias should make healthy food like Jamaican Rice and Pea's or Chinese Veges with beef.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    24. Re:Required reading by king-manic · · Score: 1

      It brings to mind organics food. It's so expensive that only the well off single upper middle class can really afford it. Thus most of us are made to be Monsantos bitch because we can't afford any different.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    25. Re:Required reading by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Those are 9 and 10 year olds, but its the parents who buy the food. How many parents really think that McDonalds is good for you?

      My 12 year brother bitches and moans about going to McDonalds. We own a friggin restraunt. My parents are incredible cooks, I myself Cook a lot of different styles of food. He's surrounded by good tasting nutritious food of every kind from Itallian to French to Japanese to our Traditional Chinese. And he still beggs to go to McDoanalds and eat their tastless garbage.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    26. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before buying any more fast food, check out Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser. I'm reading it right now, it has lots of interesting information about the fast food industry that might effect your desire for their food.

      Before you ever use the word "effect" again, please check out a dictionary.

      Of course there is also reference-dot-com.

    27. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And one really does have to go out of their way to avoid it completely (not just mcdonalds but all fast food and other questionable food companies like kraft, heinz, etc that load their foods w/ sugars/fats as well).

      Ok, that does it. this year i vote for nader again.

    28. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you won't vote for a candidate because the ex-husband of his wife got rich of a questionable food business?

    29. Re:Required reading by willjohnson · · Score: 1

      I loved that song as a kid.

      "McDonalds, McDonalds,
      Kentucky Fried Chicken,
      and a Pizza Hut."

      Genius marketing.

    30. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen the movie. I'm guessing it's not a bad documentary, but as a medical experiment, it seems somewhat lacking.

      Followed by two paragraphs which fail to mention things like "vitamins" at all. The movie is not a good medical experiment, true, but neither is your analysis a good medical analysis.

      Also, I believe that in "supersize me" the documentarist intentionally limited his exercise to what he argued are "average" levels. Also, there are interviews with other people, not just this one guy the whole time.

    31. Re:Required reading by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I don't care if you're on Atkins, or a vegetarian, or eating an all snail diet: at 5000 calories a day, you're going to get supersized.


      Correction, if you're *sedentary* and you consume 5000 calories/day you're going to get supersized.

      Athletes and people who really work for a living (I'm talking people who lift and carry heavy things all day or people like old order Mennonites who do manual farm work all day) often need higher calorie diets.

      I know several people whose daily needs run more like between 4000-5000/day, and despite the fact they'll eat the last bit of fat from that steak, their blood numbers are pretty much perfect.

      But, your average person isn't anywhere near that active.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    32. Re:Required reading by geekoid · · Score: 1

      However, it is so cheap, that in some cases it's a better economic choice then anything else. I am not tlaking about if we eat cheap I can get an iPod, I'm tlaking, if we eat cheap my kids get to eat 3 times instead of once.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Required reading by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      However, it is so cheap, that in some cases it's a better economic choice then anything else. I am not tlaking about if we eat cheap I can get an iPod, I'm tlaking, if we eat cheap my kids get to eat 3 times instead of once.

      Sorry, but that's the silliest thing I've ever heard. People who are having trouble feeding their children don't eat at McDonalds. They eat rice, noodles and top ramen, all of which are better for you than anything McDonalds sells. Some single mom with a couple of kids would spend $10-$15 on a meal at McDonalds; that same $10-$15 would buy a month's supply of rice.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    34. Re:Required reading by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      It brings to mind organics food. It's so expensive that only the well off single upper middle class can really afford it.

      Oh for crying out loud... My local grocery store sells organic veggies and such right next to the "normal" stuff. It's not that expensive. You might spend a whopping $10 extra on veggies in a given month if you only buy organic. $20 if you really go crazy.

      You're telling me only "well off single upper middle class" can afford the extra $10-20 a month? Yeah, whatever, pal. I know a guy who is unemployed with a wife and kids, living off the system, and even he can come up with an extra $20 a month for stuff.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    35. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slimy, almost liquid bread with pieces of bland soft meat and random condiments and a few bits of veges most kids pick out

      You've never had a really good sandwich, have you?

    36. Re:Required reading by king-manic · · Score: 1

      My family could not when I was growing up. Why? Because we prioritized sending me and my sister to university over buying organic.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    37. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not my fault your mom made you shitty sandwiches, with generic mystery meat cold cuts, and wonder bread. Guess you never had/made/bought a good sandwich.

    38. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people persistently think marketing is ever so clever? Making up a children's song to get kids to remember things isn't a genius inspiration; it's a several thousand year old tradition. Same applies to virtually all marketing. If advertising and marketing people had any real smarts, they'd be doing something real for a living. They're hucksters for a reason.

    39. Re:Required reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good sir, you have effected in me a desire for new linguistic learning! Thank you!

  15. Wasn't there a previous deal with Apple? by timgoh0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some time ago, there was a similar deal with the iTunes music service. See here.

    1. Re:Wasn't there a previous deal with Apple? by wacko1138 · · Score: 1

      As it says there, no actual deal existed. I suspect what happened was that there were negotiations and when they broke down, Sony stepped in and made a better offer.

  16. obligatory... by fedork · · Score: 0, Redundant

    would you like frys with that?

    --
    ...remember good 'ol times when IP used to mean Internet Protocol....
  17. Coming soon....McBritney by GillBates0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't care for Brittany's music much but I sure would like to be the meat in her sandwich ;)

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Coming soon....McBritney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well as long as you're not the pickle in her bun

  18. The joke has become reality by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

    McDonalds and Sony are teaming up to offer free music downloads to customers who buy a Big Mac Extra Value Meal

    This is sad, before I started reading the article the first thing that came to mind was making a joke that they would be offering free music downloads to customers who buy a Big Mac Extra Value Meal.

  19. Well, the Adult Happy Meals ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny

    do feature a pedometer. So after you stumble to the emergency room during the major cardiac infarction, the coroner will eventually be able to tell how many steps you walked before your untimely demise.

    1. Re:Well, the Adult Happy Meals ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...do feature a pedometer.

      And you keep track of how far you've gone by writing it down in your pedofiles?

    2. Re:Well, the Adult Happy Meals ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens is, you walk five steps and then your heart explodes inside your chest. Who needs a pedometer?

    3. Re:Well, the Adult Happy Meals ... by Rick.C · · Score: 1

      The pedometers they give away are not all that accurate. My wife got two of them and clipped them both on her belt for a day. At the end of the day one registered 5,000 steps (5,000 metric steps) and the other registered 10,000 steps (whatever that works out to in metric).

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    4. Re:Well, the Adult Happy Meals ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but that's only when you eat the five-point fat exploding-heart meal. And given the average IQ of the people that eat said meal, they'd need help counting to 5. haha

    5. Re:Well, the Adult Happy Meals ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedometer? I thought Adult Happy Meals gave away vibrators and blow up dolls.

  20. Wonder... by manavendra · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..how long will it be, before McDonald's is accused of fattening people by luring them with music then?

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  21. Time for me to be... PEDANTIC! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Hmmm, let's see, about 600 calories in a Big Mac, an average of 12 songs on a CD, so that's about 7200 calories you will need to consume in order to get an album's worth of music (and I'm not including the calories from the fries and softdrink). Does this offer also include a free gym membership?"

    You do not have to consume the food in order to get the free song. Therefore, your math is completely wrong.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  22. Remember when the Net was just getting rolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People were claiming that the computer itself would become the commodity and Net access would be the most important thing. Some companies even went so far as to give away free PCs when you signed up with their internet service.

    It turns out that the stuff they were giving away for free was the stuff that had real value. The crap they were trying to make you pay for was the real commodity.

    I don't see the difference between that back then and this latest P2P sharing scheme from Sony and McD's. I guess the biggest thing is that people really don't value music enough to pay for it, but that doesn't diminish the intrinsic value of the musical art.

  23. Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by clontzman · · Score: 5, Funny

    In what dimension do Slashdotters care about counting calories? I'd have thought that the discussion would be about how to circumvent the Sony DRM. or building a beowulf cluster of McDonalds pedometers -- something more befitting of this community.

    Be proud of the ketchup stains on your t-shirt, goddammit!

    1. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's in style these days to bash unhealthy fast food.

      It's just another thing for the people who don't believe in personal responsibility to latch on to... The evil corporations are forcing people to eat fat! How dare they!

      I wouldn't be surprised if that new "documentary" about the guy that ate only fast food for a month wasn't funded by the various lawyers that stand to benefit from class action suits against fast food.

      Fast food is the next tobacco in the real life slippery slope of litigation that hinges on the belief that no one is responsible for their actions.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      In what dimension do Slashdotters care about counting calories?

      In the "Why doesn't someone generate a three-line PERL program that will calculate and track the number of calories consumed, then synchronize that data on my PDA and distribute the information via a built-in encrypted P2P client?" dimension, of course.

      Or maybe it's just me.

    3. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Perhaps because it is a stereotype that computer geeks are fat, and as such they might be concerned about that image.

      Not to mention girls don't like fat chicks so that is one more strike against us.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that, thanks to the new law1, you can't sue fast food companies over health concerns.

      This is, without a doubt, the most blatent pro-coroprate, anti-citizen act yet. The only people it benefits are the McCEOs selling quote-unquote food to people who are so ill-educated (due to reduced funding in public education?) that they don't know any better. How does this law benefit me? It doesn't. Shouldn't these lawsuits be handled on a case-by-case basis, to determine if they have merit? Why do we allow one of our only ways of getting compensation from corporations, the lawsuit, to be taken from us? It disguts me, that McDonalds, Burger King, and the Congresspeople that they bought are claiming some sort of moral high ground. The fact is, they make people fat, and you and I, Joe and Jack Taxpayer, cover their medical costs, while executives at profit factories laugh their way to the bank, knowing that Mr. & Mrs. American will cover the cleanup costs for the pile of shit they've dumped on our heads.

      Fuck them all. Bomb McDonalds! Burn Wendy! Destroy Taco Bell! Jihad against Ronald McDonald, that's what it takes.

      --
      1. Note that is site is a coroprate financed, anti-personal freedom propaganda machine.

    5. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making the same mistake as every other "capitalist". When people complain about some product being unhealthy, you're complaing BACK at them. Why?

      If a company sells unhealthy fat foods, and people complain, they SHOULD be free to complain about it. If a product is bad, and enough people complain about it, the company will be forced to change the product or face the consequences (lost sales). THAT is capitalism.

      It seems however, that what most of the right wingers really want, is to prevent individuals from complaining about certain products (the right seems to be very anti-environment, anti-animal rights, etc. etc).

      In this case they made a movie to point out the bad sides of fast food. They should be free to do so. If you don't think they should be, move to China or some other totalitarian regime.

    6. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by Dog135 · · Score: 1

      Fast food is the next tobacco in the real life slippery slope of litigation that hinges on the belief that no one is responsible for their actions.

      After eating at McDonalds, my bowels feel like a "slippery slope".

      --
      "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
    7. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by Technician · · Score: 1

      I'd have thought that the discussion would be about how to circumvent the Sony DRM. or building a beowulf cluster of McDonalds pedometers -

      DRM and DMCA for me simply means an incompatible format. I have a Panasonic CD/MP3 jogger, a Kenwood in-dash CD-MP3 stereo and the living room has a DVD that plays MP3's. Due to DRM and the liability of attempting to play the music, using McDee's as a music source is out of the question.
      They said "don't copy or we'll sue."
      I said "OK".
      They said "come get it".
      I said, "I can't play it, why buy it?"

      Now that you mentioned the pedometers, they make a great coin counter to replace broken mechanical ones on arcade games. The handy reset button makes counting the take each time simple. Other than use in an arcade, I haven't figured out how to do the cluster of them.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:Oh, the mainstreaming of /.... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Complaining and suing are vastly different things. The force of the courts and law are not part of your free speech, when you are talking about companies selling legal products, to willing consumers, with no coersion involved.

      Your philsophy isn't much different from those that want to ban "obscene" programs from TV. You can change the fucking channel, the same as you can stop eating fucking greasy food.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  24. New health EU-Regulation affecting music industry by rh005 · · Score: 1

    this will hit Mc Donald's hard: link

  25. As Jerry Seinfeld once said, by elid · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I usually like mine with an angioplasty."

  26. McD's change in face by Raleel · · Score: 1

    you know, they might actually be trying to reduce their Big Mac parts inventory (sauce and bun mostly). Shockingly, they've actually been trying to make some moves into the healthy market. Recent additions of the adult happy meal, complete with adult toy (snicker here), and the veggie burger (i've had two, they are really quite tasty, sorta like a McRib, but without the worries of what kind of meat) and the plans to remove the super sized from all their value meals should at least be given notice, regardless of motivation. you can even get apple dippers instead of fries with your extra value meal now (I asked, they say they offer it with happy meals, but they have no problems doing it with regular ones too)

    this is probably a secondary thing though, since, IIRC, the Big Mac is McD's biggest seller (save maybe the cheeseburger). Still, it's at least a possibility

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:McD's change in face by megarich · · Score: 1

      You know I used to love McDonalds. I still eat alot of fastfood but for some reason the idea of eating anything at McDonald's makes me sick...

    2. Re:McD's change in face by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 1
      "...sorta like a McRib, but without the worries of what kind of meat..."

      I wouldn't be too sure about that.

  27. but wait... by ThePretender · · Score: 2, Interesting

    maybe they'll be adding a tie-in with Dance Dance Revolution for the Playstation 2, for the Adult Happy Meals? That would counteract the calories a little better.

    1. Re:but wait... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Not really. The more probable effect is that hundreds of thousands of McDonald's customers start dropping dead of massive heart failure.

      I'm serious; get one of those people even trying to play Max 300 and their hearts will just detonate in their chests.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  28. Supersize by sbowles · · Score: 1

    Does the supersized meal include a second song?

    --
    You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
    1. Re:Supersize by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but the bigger ass comes free.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  29. No.. by Mz6 · · Score: 1

    In that case you might as well just buy the songs and forego the food part all together. Capece?

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:No.. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "In that case you might as well just buy the songs and forego the food part all together. "

      Maybe. But if you're buying lunch for your friend or something, you don't have to consume it.
      In any event, that comment was meant as satirical.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:No.. by Mz6 · · Score: 1

      I know... so was mine :)

      --
      Hmmm.
  30. A Rant by ahoehn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish everyone would quit their bitching about how unhealthy McDonalds is. I don't mean to be a defender of bad food, in fact, I'm a vegetarian and eat at McDonalds once or twice a year, but it's not like McDonalds ever pretended that their food was healthy. If the American public is too retarded to tell that eating a jucy burger, deep FAT fried french fries, and a calorie-sugar-caffene laden soda isn't good for them, the maybe they deserve to have their arteries clogged.
    Sure, it's a bit sad that they market their product so strongly to children - but adults have no reason to complain. If you don't want horribly unhealthy food, don't eat there - or at least get one of their moderately healthy parfaits or salads or the new veggie burger.
    The only thing that really pisses me off about McDonalds is that when they finally started making a Veggie Burger, they made it taste like shit. There's lots of veggie burgers out there that taste great, but McDonalds had to make one that could never compete in taste with their real meat patties.
    This is Andrew Q Ranter, signing off.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    1. Re:A Rant by Mz6 · · Score: 1

      It's not only a bitch about McDonald's but all of these fast food places. Years ago, they really didn't offer any healthy alternatives. Speaking in a highly realtive American mindset, us Americans are always GO GO GO.. Therefore we want food that can be served and eaten at that same pace. The only places that offered that were McDonald's BK, Wendy's, etc... However, they really had NO alternative healthy choices years ago. Now that everyone is dieting and eating somewhat healthier these fast food places have realized that to keep revneue and profits up they need to switch and offer healthier food to appeal to EVERYONE.

      --
      Hmmm.
    2. Re:A Rant by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      deep FAT fried french fries

      but ... we need more french fry consumers so we'll have enough waste oil for our enviro-friendly biodiesel autos!

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    3. Re:A Rant by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      There's lots of veggie burgers out there that taste great, but McDonalds had to make one that could never compete in taste with their real meat patties.

      Surely you jest. How many people in the focus group said, "Can you make it taste like your horse meat?"

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    4. Re:A Rant by fermion · · Score: 1
      In fact they may have made such claims. In the famous trial in England, the even sued a person that was calling McDonalds food unhealthy, or, I believe, non-nutritional. In the end all McDonalds could do was prove that the food could be part of an otherwise healthy diet.

      In the end the fast food industry may go the way of the tobacco industry. Both have products that are not good, but not bad in small doses. Both have engineer their product to increase the addiction and often in the process increase the toxicity. Both have targeted inappropriate audiences.

      The US public is too stupid not to do many things. That does not mean that corporations that try to unduly profit off that stupidity don't get sued into oblivion, especially when those corporations have specific knowledge or should have specific knowledge that what they are doing is probably not legal. This campaign will probably be used as a prime exhibit in the upcoming litigation.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:A Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said:
      get one of their moderately healthy parfaits or salads

      This is exactly where the biggest part of the problem lies, imo. The "moderatly heatlhty" parfait (Which they advertise usuing commercials including people doing yoga), has as many calories as the freakin big mac. The salads too!

      Not to mention the fact that, though the nutritional information is supposed to be available, it rarely is. Many times the in-store posters containing nutritional information get covered up with other promotional material, never to be seen by a potential health conscious McDonalds patron.

    6. Re:A Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People need to stop with the ridiculous attitude that eating a Big Mac once in a while is so dangerous. Just eat healthy most of the time, get plenty of exercise and the occasional Big Mac and fries will not be much of an issue.

    7. Re:A Rant by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      in fact, I'm a vegetarian and eat at McDonalds once or twice a year

      Isn't that kind of like claiming your a virgin because you've only slept with 4 or 5 people?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:A Rant by runamok1 · · Score: 1

      Which McDonalds location are you getting "jucy" burgers at? I've only had flat tasteless meat sponges.

    9. Re:A Rant by runamok1 · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem *I* have with McDonalds is that they market to children (not unlike certain tobacco companies you may have heard of). Read "Fast Food Nation" as previously mentioned. McDonalds is well aware of which age range is most vulnerable to marketing. And guess what, when these children are adults, they WILL equate McDonalds with "comfort food" despite logically knowing it is terrible for you. Not to mention all the parents that are drug to McDonalds by their kids. Part of the problem is the lack luster education we receive re: nutrition in this country. I once read that the entire federal budget for nutritional marketing in the US is less than the marketing budget for Altoids.

    10. Re:A Rant by laigle · · Score: 1
      There's lots of veggie burgers out there that taste great, but McDonalds had to make one that could never compete in taste with their real meat patties.


      No, no there are not. There are some veggie burgers that taste slightly less like raw sewage than others, but there are no good veggie burgers. You want a vegetarian hamburger, make it with a grilled portabello or maybe some fried eggplant. Or here's a crazy idea, try eating a vegetarian dish instead of making believe you're eating meat.

      The veggie burger is just an outgrowth of the health nut obsession with evangelizing those of us who eat meat. Carrot chips and wood shavings are not going to taste as good as dead cow, no matter how hard you try.
    11. Re:A Rant by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "There's lots of veggie burgers out there that taste great, but McDonalds had to make one that could never compete in taste with their real meat patties."

      You do realize its not just their veggie burgers that taste like shit don't you? Last I checked, McDonald's never won any awards for Best Tasting Burger of the Year.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    12. Re:A Rant by untaken_name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention all the parents that are drug to McDonalds by their kids.

      Unless the kid is driving with a gun to the parent's head, blame the parent. Any parent who does whatever their kids want just to keep them quiet is a bad parent. Kids do not KNOW what is good for them, because they are kids and don't have the experience or the rational thinking skills. That's why parents make their kids' decisions for them. Allowing kids to do whatever they want just to keep them quiet is a recipe for disaster. The stereotypical kid you see on commercials, wild and rowdy and only calm when they get product x, just feeds into this mindset that kids should get a say and it matters what kids think. You should always listen to your kids, and let them make choices that are appropriate for them to make, but you shouldn't let them dictate to you what and where they eat. Do this thing called 'parenting' and you won't end up with 400lb tv-addicted ignorant kids. Or, foist that responsibility off on everyone else, and stop bitching about how your kids turned out.

    13. Re:A Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no there are not. There are some veggie burgers that taste slightly less like raw sewage than others, but there are no good veggie burgers.

      I just had the Gardenburger basil and tomato one last night. Delicious.

      You want a vegetarian hamburger, make it with a grilled portabello or maybe some fried eggplant.

      No, I want a goddam veggie burger. 1.5 minutes in the microwave. I like convenience.

      Or here's a crazy idea, try eating a vegetarian dish instead of making believe you're eating meat

      I'm not "making believe [I'm] eating meat" - most burgers don't taste like (and aren't supposed to taste like) meat. I like them because they are cheap, and easy to make. Don't like my choice of meals? Fuck you. I get enough shit from my girlfriend (organic gardener) about how they aren't nutrious, I don't need some slashbot telling me what to do.

      The veggie burger is just an outgrowth of the health nut obsession with evangelizing those of us who eat meat.

      No, the veggie burger is like the animal-burger: cheap, fast, and convenient.

      I don't give a fuck what you or anyone else eats, but I find your patholigcal hatred of vegetarians amusing. What's a matter one of us beat you up?

      Carrot chips and wood shavings are not going to taste as good as dead cow, no matter how hard you try.

      Dunno, never tried that combo. Anyway, cow tastes gross, and the way they are raised and slaughtered is disgusting, and I don't even like animals, or care about animal rights (although what are humans if not animals?)

    14. Re:A Rant by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      well you know, what motivation do they have to make one that's good? I doubt they're losing much market share due to vegans/vegetarians not going there.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    15. Re:A Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have salads dumbass.
      Just because meat is on the menu doesn't mean you have to eat it.

    16. Re:A Rant by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I don't drink alcoholic beverages. Oh, apart from beer.

    17. Re:A Rant by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I wish everyone would quit their bitching about how unhealthy McDonalds is.

      Smashing your head between a concrete floor and a sledge hammer is unhealthy too. McDonald's is an American icon that is recognised as "American goodness" around the world, smashing your head is not.

      I personally think that any comments about such a world known establishment are welcome, because we (collectively) have made it the icon that it is, and maybe its time for the icon to either change, or for us to have a new one.

    18. Re:A Rant by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      Yes. You would be absolutely correct if McDonlalds only served meat. But they happen to serve a few other things, like French Fries, or the Parfaits and Salads I MENTIONED IN MY POST. But you were being humerous, and I shouldn't take it personally, but sometimes I get ANGRY WHEN PEOPLE ACCUSE ME OF KILLING ANIMALS SO I CAN EAT THEM. My apologies.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    19. Re:A Rant by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      Plenty of meals at McD's would be fine for a vegetarian. Their fruit/yogurt parfait contains no meat, and I believe you can get side salads meat free. Depending on how strict a vegetarian/vegan you are, fries would be okay too, a would their dessert menu. Their shakes, I believe, are a soft serve base which while not being great for you, won't do you too much harm. Their breakfasts, also, can be had meat free.

      In conclusion, your comparison is rather lacking.

      --trb

    20. Re:A Rant by Sahib! · · Score: 1

      Watch out for their french fries. They use beef flavoring (my emphasis):

      Potatoes, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, natural flavor ( beef source), dextrose, sodium acid pyrophosphate (to preserve natural color). Cooked in partially hydrogenated vegetable oils (may contain partially hydrogenated soybean oil and/or partially hydrogenated corn oil and/or partially hydrogenated canola oil and/or cottonseed oil and/or sunflower oil and/or corn oil).
      --

      I prayed about it, and God said, "Don't do it!" But I thought, "I know better."

    21. Re:A Rant by Rupert · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the McDonalds executives claiming that McDonalds' food is "nutritious".

      It's the same lie that got the tobacco industry where they are now. Everyone knew smoking causes lung cancer. The cigarette companies bribed enough scientists to falsify results to create a controversy, and survived decades of court cases on the resulting ambiguity.

      Someone from McDonalds should stand up and say that people who want to live had better not eat more than one Big Mac a week. It may cut profits a little now, but they'll save themselves billions in the future.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    22. Re:A Rant by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      Marketing to kids starts a problem that is carried into adulthood. It is systemic, there is tiny trickle of information reaching kids about healthy eating compared to the massive flood of advertisments from the food industry. Kids are bombarded with advertisements for high sugary foods and mac donalds, school lunches are also often high fat, high in sugar and highly processed so the wrong message is coming from the schools, and if the parents aren't eating well (which a very large number don't) it isn't coming from home. So exactly where do you learn to diet properly and live a healthy lifestyle?

    23. Re:A Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Beef source? Is that an open source?

      Sauce is what you mean, beef source is bull. Or cow...

    24. Re:A Rant by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but, uh, I can't tell you how many "vegetarians" I know who "only eat fish" or "only eat chicken breast" or "only eat seafoods."

      Uh, vegetarian is vegetarian. If you have a moral objection to eating a cow, why wouldn't that same objection apply to a shrimp or a salmon or a chicken?

      Nothing against you personally, it's just that there are so many fake vegetarians out there who only do it to be trendy that it gets hard to take any vegetarians seriously. And then there's Maddox's point which is that basically anything you do to survive is going to kill some animal somewhere.

    25. Re:A Rant by eclectus · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would claim that you are killing & maiming plantlife so you could eat it. I get a little upset at vegitarians who claim that they don't want to eat meat for moral reasons, because they don't want to be responsible for the death of something.

      Everything you eat to sustain you comes from something that was/is alive, and if you are gonna be upset about someone killing and eating Bambi, then perhaps you should strickly follow your moral code and stop eating all together.

      Now pass me some of that there that you was eating on....

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    26. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Just being vegetarian doesn't make you a healthy eater. A lot of vegetarians (especially the teenage girl kind) don't eat the right things and end up with malnutrition. Pure Vegans suffer from this the most whent hey start.

      Though even a misguided Vegan will be more healthy then a McConsumer.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    27. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 1

      ANGRY WHEN PEOPLE ACCUSE ME OF KILLING ANIMALS SO I CAN EAT THEM

      You kill a few hundred thousand bacteria (animals) everyday and digest them for some nutrients you don't normally recive in yoru diet. Same thing happens in yoru colon with the E. coli there when they die. Up until recently those french fries had beef broth in them. So yeah. He's was right btu not for obvious reasons.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    28. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Reciept for a good tasting vegetarian burger:

      Take a slab of Tofu (hard kind, low water content) slap some south western spice on it,dice it up with soem herbs, deep fry the bits. Mash this fried tofu in with some wetter tofu color with soy sauce. Make a patti. Fry on a pan until it's appropriatly brown. It'll taste as god or better then a McGarbage burger. Depending on how you put the burger together.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    29. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless the kid is driving with a gun to the parent's head, blame the parent. Any parent who does whatever their kids want just to keep them quiet is a bad parent. Kids do not KNOW what is good for them, because they are kids and don't have the experience or the rational thinking skills. That's why parents make their kids' decisions for them. Allowing kids to do whatever they want just to keep them quiet is a recipe for disaster. The stereotypical kid you see on commercials, wild and rowdy and only calm when they get product x, just feeds into this mindset that kids should get a say and it matters what kids think. You should always listen to your kids, and let them make choices that are appropriate for them to make, but you shouldn't let them dictate to you what and where they eat. Do this thing called 'parenting' and you won't end up with 400lb tv-addicted ignorant kids. Or, foist that responsibility off on everyone else, and stop bitching about how your kids turned out.

      Have you raised many kids lately? It's easy to say it harder to do it. My parents did a fair job with my little brother but he still whines and moans. Even though we rarely give in. However due to time contraints of having to work more then full time my parents have given in once in a whiel and also feel bad soemtiems when they don't. It's not so easy. You can only be a parent part time due to the economic realities that this society enforces. We all must be dual income households. We all must work 40+ hours a week. Some work more to better the lfie of their children.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    30. Re:A Rant by bmalia · · Score: 1

      Its not just their veggie burgers. Their hamburgers taste like shit too. lol

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    31. Re:A Rant by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Have you raised many kids lately? No, just one. Not 'many'

      It's easy to say it harder to do it.

      This is true with many things that nevertheless must be done. Paying bills, going to work, etc.

      My parents did a fair job with my little brother but he still whines and moans.

      Few children do not whine and moan. As a parent, it's your responsibility to resist your kid's wishes when they are against that kid's best interests.

      Even though we rarely give in.

      Rarely is okay. It is the people who give up and give in to everything or a large portion of things because they 'don't want to fight' or 'don't want to hear it' that are failing as parents.

      However due to time contraints of having to work more then full time my parents have given in once in a whiel and also feel bad soemtiems when they don't.

      Which feels worse: having to listen to your kid cry (which yes it breaks your heart) or having to watch your kids grow up to be thoughtless, impulsive, fat morons?

      It's not so easy.

      No, it isn't easy. These are LIVES we're talking about, why does everyone assume it should be easy? It's a lot of responsibility and hard work to raise a child. If you aren't prepared for that, if you want the benefits without the work, you are not ready for the responsibility.

      You can only be a parent part time due to the economic realities that this society enforces.

      Bullshit. If you can't afford to have kids, DON'T HAVE KIDS. If you can't make it on one income, either one of you needs to get a better job, you need to re-prioritize your spending, or you don't need a kid right now. If you're irresponsible enough to conceive a kid when you're not prepared for one, then I guess I can't expect you to be responsible enough to raise that kid. Just don't tell me it's impossible because that's easy to disprove.

      We all must be dual income households. We all must work 40+ hours a week.

      Blatantly not true.

      Some work more to better the lfie of their children.

      That's a good excuse. Work a ton BEFORE you have kids, if you must both work. Save up, THEN have the kid. Don't tell yourself that letting TV or nannies or the government raise your kids so YOU can make more money and get a higher score in life is really for the kids. Kids don't care about money and society unless they are trained to. Kids do care about time spent with parents. That's what makes a kid's life better, not a bank balance.

    32. Re:A Rant by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I'm going to be defending vegetarians, but not everyone who calls themselves vegetarian does so for idealogical reasons. There are some who choose to do so for flavor reasons (much the same reason I *can't* be a vegetarian), financial reasons (per pound, vegetables and fruit are much cheaper than meat), etc. That doesn't make them fake vegetarians, just not idealogical ones.

    33. Re:A Rant by -tji · · Score: 1

      The french fries still contain flavoring from a beef source. Read "Fast Food Nation", he covers this in the book.

      They used to be fried in "beef tallow" (cow fat). But, after a bit of public uproar about the extremely high fat content, they switched to vegetable oil. But, to keep the McDonald's flavor, they use highly concentrated "natural flavor" derived from that cow fat.

    34. Re:A Rant by nicedream · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would claim your point is a troll. I get a little upset at non-vegetarians that feel the need to point out that plants are alive too. Brilliant find, Einstein. Never heard that one before.

      News flash: plants have no central nervous system, feel no pain, and are not sentient creatures.

    35. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 1

      My parents are immigrants from china who do not speak english well. They have put me and my sister through university. They average 60hours a week at work to feed and cloth us. They don't spend on themselves at all. They made an avaerage of $8 an hour of money adjusted for inflation for that whoel period. Together they barely scrap togetehr 40k a year which according to our government makes us below the poverty line. We have never been on social assitance.

      It's easy when you have options. much harder when you have no options. And I will save up before I have kids because I have the option. I know teen moms who don't. Bad planning? yes. But telling them that won't make thier lives any easier. Also Univerisyt if Expensive here (5k a year tuition anothe rk for books) but is sick in the states (20k/ year + 1 k in books). You need a second morgatge for your kids education.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    36. Re:A Rant by dman123 · · Score: 1
      But, after a bit of public uproar about the extremely high fat content, they switched to vegetable oil.

      Hopefully they will soon be switching to triglycerides to get rid of the fat content once and for all! ;)

      But seriously, I know you meant to say they switched because of the higher saturated fat content. I don't recall for sure, but I thought McD switched away from beef fat because the fries were not kosher/vegetarian. A lot of US movie theaters switched from saturated fats like coconut to others about 5 years ago IIRC.

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    37. Re:A Rant by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 1

      Most dual income families that I know don't need to be dual income. They both work so they can afford to buy a better house and drive nicer cars. The time constraints are due to their own choices. They have chosen to have nice things rather than to take the time to raise their children. In my opinion it's a very bad trade. Children don't get the attention that they need in day care. Thus, when I get married it will be to someone who would rather stay home and raise our children than drive a new car. You have to decide what is more important to you.

      I don't have children but I have a lot of neices and nephews and friends with children. And, I see that the children from single income homes are generally better behaved and respect their parents' decisions more than those from dual income homes. The reason for this is partly because they don't have the "time constraints" and don't have to give in to the convenience factor. Thus, going to McDonalds is a rare treat and not a regular occurance.

    38. Re:A Rant by geekoid · · Score: 1

      see, that doesn't make sense. If a Veggie burger took off, they would have less overhead with there cattle.

      If I were you, I would put together a nice letter, point them to some Veggie burger products that don't taste like ass, and encourage them to kep up the good work.

      I am not a vegetarian, but I would try a Vegie burger from McDonalds. Well I would have, but after your review, I'll Pass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    39. Re:A Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Saying all vegetarians are so because of idealogical (sp) reasons is like saying that people only use Linux because they hate Microsoft. It's simply not true.

      Likewise, claiming that all or most vegetarians also eat chicken, or fish, or whatever, is also not true. Just because you know some people doesn't make it so. Again, thats like Windows zealots claiming that all Linux users dual-boot because no one can do real work under Linux. Totally false.

    40. Re:A Rant by cavetroll · · Score: 1
      Uh, vegetarian is vegetarian. If you have a moral objection to eating a cow, why wouldn't that same objection apply to a shrimp or a salmon or a chicken?
      Simple, cows, sheep, pigs etc are mammals. Fish and chicken are not, to contradict (somewhat) the other poster on this thread it *is* possible to be an 'idealogical' vegetarian and eat fish (or indeed chicken although personally I do not). In my case it is due to a disgust at the notion of eating dead mammals, go to any abbatoir and you will understand why I fell that way. I stuggle to see these as food and therefore find eating them repellent.

      I have no objection to killing animals, in fact I am a strong supporter of vivisection as a means to saving people's lives in the course of medical research. Fish are not flea-ridden furry disease vectors that occupy farmland, I find these far easier to eat (and tastier too, but that is another point).

      Unfortunatly too many vegetarians are members of the cute fluffy animals brigade whose brains have been addled by too many disney cartoons. I try to disassociate myself with them, as a result if asked "Are you a vegetarian?" I typically reply "no, I just don't eat meat"

    41. Re:A Rant by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      You kill a few hundred thousand bacteria (animals) . . .

      Bacteria aren't animals. If you classify life into just plants and animals, they're plants. If you classify life into more kingdoms, they're Prokaryotes, or other scentific gibberish.

      --
      -Dave
    42. Re:A Rant by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Umm, Mr. King, bacteria aren't animals. They're bacteria. An animal has to be multicellular; bacteria don't even have nuclei, for chrissakes man.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    43. Re:A Rant by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      and are not sentient creatures.

      Umm... even by really liberal estimates, very few animals can be classed as "sentient." Maybe you eat humans, but I don't.

      I do not see what eclectus said as a troll. It is true. While there are many reasons not to eat the flesh of another animal, you still must come to terms that many organisms are giving their lives up so that you may live. A lot of vegetarians I've known can't seem to cope with this much either, and just blow up about it. /me shrugs

      No matter if it is an animal or not, I show respect to the life that is sacrificed to me. What is so hard about that?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    44. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Bacteria aren't animals. If you classify life into just plants and animals, they're plants. If you classify life into more kingdoms, they're Prokaryotes, or other scentific gibberish.

      Bacteria are enither. Their prokaryotes, while animals and plants are eukaryotes. However they exhibit many of the features that animals exhibit. They move, they eat other organisms, they lack chlorofil (most of them) and excrete waste products. They are not plants.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    45. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Their prokaryotes. And thier diversity surpases that of the Eukarotes. Some of them do in fact have a nuclei liek stucture. Although the only thing baring most of them from beign animals is the requirement to be multicellular.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    46. Re:A Rant by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to join the "cute fulffy animal brigade" but the reason I don't eat meat is because I don't like killing animals. It's clear to most everybody that dog's feel some sort of affection, and pain, and lonleyness, and a whole wide gamut of emotions - so why do we choose not to extend those emotions to cows and pigs and sheep?
      It is easier to imagine that pultry, and even fish, don't have the same capacity to feel as mammals - I spent last year in Belize and ate fish while I was there without feeling too much guilt. But I saw that as more of a personal weakness than a moral decision.
      Last night I was driving up in the mountains I saw a fawn (baby deer) laying on the road. When I saw it in my headlights, it just hunkered down to further try and not be seen. I had to sit there for about three minutes before it finally decided that I had seen it and it got up and walked away. It was very clearly scared. It was, quite possibly, the most adoreable thing I have ever seen. I couldn't imagine eating it anymore than I could imagine eating a human baby.
      Of course later that night while I was laying in my sleeping bag in the woods I heard a cougar call rediculously close to where I was and I packed up my bag and drove home. I'm sure there's some deeper meaning there that I'm missing.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    47. Re:A Rant by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Check a freshman or high school biology textbook- there is a little more than just being multicellular that makes an animal.

      (I will be a nice guy and avoid all the obvious pointers to a freshman english textbook.)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    48. Re:A Rant by king-manic · · Score: 1

      from:Dictionary

      animal ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-ml)
      A multicellular organism of the kingdom Animalia, differing from plants in certain typical characteristics such as capacity for locomotion, nonphotosynthetic metabolism, pronounced response to stimuli, restricted growth, and fixed bodily structure.

      About 60% of this definition applies to bacteria. None of it to plants. What plants and bacteria share are a similiar cell wall. As for Text books, I'm aware that they are not stricktly animals but they also not plants. The prokaryote group encompasses far far more diversity then the eukaryote group. I am a University graduate, I took genetics and biology. The kindom classification is very very subjective. There are bacteria which would satisfy all of the Dictionary definitions for beign an animal. In a way your right, according to the classic definition Bacteria aren't "animals" however I was just tryign to make a point. No matter what you eat somethign suffers for it.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    49. Re:A Rant by nicedream · · Score: 1


      I see you conveniently left out the "plants have no central nervous system, feel no pain" part I wrote.

      Also, from m-w.com:

      sentient: responsive to or conscious of sense impressions

      How would animals not be considered sentient?

  31. band wagon by millahtime · · Score: 1

    This looks like a bandwagon. The promotion must have gone well with iTunes Store so they are jumping on the next company.

    Only problem is i doubt the Sony setup will be to the same quality as the iTMS setup.

  32. The question is... by Shamanin · · Score: 2, Funny

    what size server farm will be able to live up to their "Over a Billion Served" claim.

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  33. the new line there by mpost4 · · Score: 0

    so you want a song to go with that heart attack?

  34. Rethinking 'free' music by amichalo · · Score: 1

    I am not so sure this free music thing is going to work. I was excited when Apple announced the Pepsi deal, but it proved unsuccessful by most people's measure. Though they laid the blame on distribution channel issues, I think there are a few things to be learned:

    (1) Do people want to go to 'all that trouble' for a free song? When you have to download software, setup an account, (and perhaps provide a credit card), then find the song you want and download it, just to be unable to play it on your choice of music device (ITMS only plays on iPod / no one else plays on iPod).

    (2) Is a song really that valuable? If I buy a coke or a Big Mac, do I really care that much about trying some new music thing to save the bottle cap or box top or whatever and use it? The Sunday paper is full of coupons for saving much more than 99 cents, but many people just recycle them.

    (3) Is there too much choice? Perhaps people need FEWER options for their music. If I am told I can have ANY song I want for free, I start thinking of music...but the music I am thinking of I already own and listen to now. Maybe the givaway needs to be 'one of these five songs' or something similar, to let people envision what they are getting, then they can better evaluate if it is worth their time.

    Just a few free musing on free music.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  35. Now why would I... by h4rdc0d3 · · Score: 1

    ...want a gym memership when I can just sue McDonalds for making me fat and then get lipo? I figure I can do this every 6 months or so.

    1. Re:Now why would I... by mobiux · · Score: 1

      Actually, the way lipo works is removing the fat cells in your body. There are only a limited number of them. When you gain weight, the fat cells are just expanding to hold more.
      So once you get lipo, there are no fat cells to expand.

      You would end up looking pretty odd if you get lipo and start gaining weight again.
      The only description I can think of is...dented?

  36. Slightly OT, but... by pcaylor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are people so worked up about McDonald's food these days? It's never been a big secret that fast food isn't healthy. After all, it's called Junk Food for a reason. Heck, McDonald's has had nutritional information posted in their restaurants for twenty years. (And it's on their website too.) Anybody who cares the slightest about what they eat has all the information they need to make an informed decision. McDonald's doesn't hold a gun to your head and make you buy/eat their food. It's not addictive. If they want to gorge and eat an UltraMegaSized Triple Big Mac with extra mayo, why should you care?

    If you don't like the food at McDonald's, buy your food somewhere else. Is it too much to ask people to accept some personal responsibility for their lifestyle choices?

    1. Re:Slightly OT, but... by Analise · · Score: 1

      Is it too much to ask people to accept some personal responsibility for their lifestyle choices?

      Why take personal responsibility when you can blame someone else and hopefully get lots of money and/or freeload your way through life?

      People bug.

      --
      >insert witty sig file here
    2. Re:Slightly OT, but... by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      The other post (as of this time) sorta makes the point, but to elucidate it a little bit... ever since the lawyers said so.

      There's been some fairly large battles in the past over where personal responsibility begins and ends. Pintos tend to explode on impact. Was it the customer's responsibility to recognize that he was responsible for choosing such a badly designed car, or the company's responsibility to engineer better designed car? The latter.

      Cigarettes kill people. Was it the customer's responsibility to recognize that he was responsible for any health effects resulting from sucking smoke for 50 years, or the company's responbility to create health cigarettes? The latter... but only because the tobacco companies withheld evidence of the health effects of their products.

      McDonald's food is killing people. Lawyer's are arguing that it is too much to ask people to accept personal responsibility for our choices. I think that's a pretty good indicator of the sad story of how we've treated our personal freedom in the U.S. Did McDonald's hold anything back? Probably not. Is it their responsibility to engineer better food? Probably. It'll be interesting to see where the justice system lands on this one.

    3. Re:Slightly OT, but... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      Do you realize your self-righteous rant has NOTHING to do with the actual fast-food debate. CLEARLY comsuing fast food is a matter of personal choice, and personal responsibility. NOONE is arguing that. If you'd bothered to read Fast Food NAtion or watch Supersize me you'd know: personal responsibility is the paramount reason for AN INDIVIDUAL's own unhealthiness. What the books and the movie DO say is that these companies go out of their way to obscure health facts (that should be readily available), market their shit to kids, and offer such poor quality food as to be a health hazard. Yes, noone has to eat it, and NOONE is playing the victim (except for those 2 girls that sued McD's for making them fat, their lawyer is interviewed during the movie and it's very fucking obvious his interest is purely monetary).

      You sound like an apoligist and a shill for the fast food MAN. Watch the movie and open your mind, but when you do so keep your brain in check: NOONE is absolving the eater of their own responsibility.

    4. Re:Slightly OT, but... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      McDonald's food is killing people.

      No one has said McD's is healthy. Saying McD's is killing people is like a person that buys a gun to shoot themselves. Is Smith & Wesson in any way really responsible for the conditions that caused that guy to do so? Put it this way: I can kill people with a Craftsman hammer. Is SEARS responsible for selling me the hammer?

      But then, I'd say Ford is probably responsible for Pinto because there was no way for the first buyers to know about the flaw. The danger there was exaggerated, but real. The sad thing is that current Crown Victorias have a similer flaw, although less severe, it shouldn't be there.

    5. Re:Slightly OT, but... by MagicM · · Score: 1

      McDonald's food is killing people.

      You make it sound like the burgers just jump off the grill and start feeding on your skull. Food doesn't kill people; people eating food kills people.

      Coincidentally, people NOT eating food also kills people. If McDonald's is responsible for people dying from eating their food, is McDonald's also responsible for people dying from NOT eating their (nor anyone else's) food?

    6. Re:Slightly OT, but... by pcaylor · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am familiar with Supersize me and am surprised you would haul it out as a reference since it helps to prove my point. Spurlock uses the appeal to the absurd to try to make his point. Here are some examples:

      1) He would always supersize his meal anytime it was offered to him. Apparently he believes that McDonald's customers have no free will at all and are forced to take every option offered to him. (By the way, I would love to have Spurlock as a customer of my business!)

      2) Because Spurlock maintains that McDonald's "promotes a sedentary lifestyle" he avoided all exercise during the filming of the movie. Yet, no one can show where McDonald's encourages people not to exercise.

      3) Spurlock's "typical" McDonald's breakfasts consists of two full breakfast meals (sandwich, hash browns and coffee) Ordering two full meals seems like an odd way to complain about a restaurant's portions.
      Since you brought up SuperSize Me, are you aware of Soso Whaley's response to SuperSize Me, where she eat's nothing but McDonald's food for a month and looses weight and lowers her cholesterol? The difference, she make sensible choices and exercised some amount of responsibility in choosing what she ate.

      By the way, since you claim the fast food industry goes out of their way to obscure heallth facts, could you site an example? Here's a counter example:
      Nutrition info from McDonald's

    7. Re:Slightly OT, but... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I've already touched on the personal responsibility mantra elsewhere. I'll limit myself to one of your assertions: Fast food is not addictive.

      This depends entirely on your definition of addiction. Webster has both a narrow and a broad definition of addiction. The first one is pretty narrowly tailored towards drugs, but I think the latter applies nicely to fast food.

      We are genetically predisposed to prefer high fat, high sugar foods. This was a perfect survival strategy back when calories were scarce. But now they're everywhere. It's gotten to where food is so abundant in America that the high-calorie crap is far cheaper than the foods that are actually good for you. In such an environment, our innate desires actually work to undermine our own health.

      The entire fast food industry takes advantage of this internal drive. Despite a few attempts at offering healthy choices, they generally make the big bucks by competing to make the biggest, most fattening, cheapest meals, and then advertising them to consumers as highly desirable.

      That's just the direction the profit motive is taking the industry, and I don't see any non-government solution for forcing "personal responsibility" on our corporate masters.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:Slightly OT, but... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      HA! PROOF you didn't see the movie:

      Here's a counter example:
      Nutrition info from McDonald's


      Spurlock makes a point about how it IS available on the web page, but also points out how most of the developed world DOESN'T have internet access. Yours is a typical "wired" /. mentality. You think the whole world has access and is saavy enough? His random sampling of stores has shown that the stores either obscure or DON'T carry health info.

      As to your other responses: Spurlock was NOT going for the absurd. There are ACTUALLY people who eat fast food like that. Obviously you'll refuse to believe that because you're a shill and naive, but there are many people WITHOUT the common sense, or the will power to STOP eating. STILL Spurlock NEVER denies the role of personal responsibility.

      Spurlock's 'rule' about supersizing was NOT to imitate a mindless consumerism. It was to show that MCD's has NO qualms about irresponsibly shoving their toxic sludge at consumers in amounts that noone should eat.

      I'll read up on this Soso Whaley. Spurlock himself interviews a man who eats an obscene amount of Big Macs and isn't gratuitously obese. Why isn't he unhealthy? These kinds of things are genetic as well. But you say "common sense" dictates that an all McD's diet is unhealthy, sure, then what kind of message is Whaley sending? Furthermore, what interest could YOU possibly have in defending a company that knowingly does shite like this? Is it just some knee-jerk conservative reaction to our sue-happy america? Consider a moderate's response.

      Someone filling their face with McD's is not living an active lifestyle. McD's job is to sell more crap burgers. Therefore McD's is not interested in your health. That's common sense. They don't have to put big fuck-off signs on their windows saying "Exercise is Unamerican" to contribute to a major health DISASTER.

      How's this for "common sense". The free market (which I support) should punish those who seek to harm the consumer by selling crap in quantities that they purport to be healthy. That's not some flaming liberal reaction. That's a moderate's reaction to a MAJOR CRISIS.

    9. Re:Slightly OT, but... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It is becasue a lot of large groups who want to do good have been taken over by Anti-corporationists.

      There is a group of people who want to be sure what a fast food resturant says is in a item of food is what is actually in there. to me this is a good thing. Then some people with other agendas, takw over these groups and raise a overly dramatic stink about a whole lot of nothing.

      The worse is environmental groups. Enviromental groups use to just want the things by large companies to be as clean as possible. Most enviromentalist that I know don't mind Nuclear power, they just want it clean regulated and don't smart. Thanks to propaganda, most people don't really know what nuclear power is, how little waste there is(compared to what people think), and how green it can be.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Slightly OT, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the parent post because he manages to bend over backward distorting the truth to make his point. Let me just refute a few of his assertions:

      1) He would always supersize his meal anytime it was offered to him.
      True, but in the end he was only asked to Supersize 9 times during the month. If you are making a movie about the effects of a mcdonalds diet on your body, having to eat supersized meals when offered seems like a sensible ground rule.

      2) Because Spurlock maintains that McDonald's "promotes a sedentary lifestyle" he avoided all exercise during the filming of the movie. Yet, no one can show where McDonald's encourages people not to exercise.
      Two things are wrong with this, 1) Never does Spurlock maintain that McD promotes a sedentary lifestyle. 2) He does not avoid all excercise. He tries to excercise as much as the average American (less than a mile of walking a day). Again, a sensible rule if you are testing the effects of McD's on your health.

      3) Spurlock's "typical" McDonald's breakfasts consists of two full breakfast meals (sandwich, hash browns and coffee) Ordering two full meals seems like an odd way to complain about a restaurant's portions.
      Where did you get this information? Certainly not from the movie! He clearly states that he eats 3 square meals a day, and tries to vary them in order to sample everything on the menu.

      People like the parent poster clearly have an adgenda, and are trying to discredit this worthy film through misinformation. It was my impression that Mr. Spurlock was not out to get McDonalds. I'm sure he had a good hunch that this diet, and especially the reduced excercise would be bad for him. What is surprising is how amazingly bad for him the combination turns out to be.

    11. Re:Slightly OT, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The free market (which I support) should punish those who seek to harm the consumer by selling crap in quantities that they purport to be healthy. That's not some flaming liberal reaction. That's a moderate's reaction to a MAJOR CRISIS.

      We also have other "crises" in the world, such as starvation. And most people dealing with those situations don't give a shit whether some fat fuck in the first world is stuffing his face while having his head up his ass at the same time. Unless companies such as McDonalds are either 1) Lying to their customers, or 2) secretly putting some type of addictive substance in their food, these customers won't have a leg to stand on. Also, McDonalds does have interest in your health, if it means making more money for them (which it does in some cases). But in most cases, McDonalds know that their customers will probably just buy the same old burger that they have always enjoyed. That doesn't mean that they cannot provide alternatives for their customers - which they have done - but they can only do so much to get a customer to jump on the healthy bandwagon (i.e. starting to eat their salads).

    12. Re:Slightly OT, but... by chickenmonger · · Score: 1

      That's what always confused me. The people that bash fast food places never eat there anyway. It would be a lot more helpful to the cause of "slimming down America" if those health-conscious individuals kept to their salads and Diet Cokes, and leave the double quarter pounders and large shakes to the rest of us.

    13. Re:Slightly OT, but... by Groovus · · Score: 1
      If they want to gorge and eat an UltraMegaSized Triple Big Mac with extra mayo, why should you care?

      Reason 1 to care, for the strictly self interested: Because we all end up paying for it. In the U.S. we're an over 30% obese population and climbing steadily.* That puts an incredible amount of unecessary strain on our already malfunctioning health care system. It also results in increasing abuses of the already overworked legal system as cases are brought more often relating to health problems. And everybody who pays taxes, health care insurance or any medical related cost in the U.S. has to foot part of those bills.

      Reason 2 for the humanitarians: Because this now rampant problem is really a sad thing for those so effected. I'm not saying everyone should be runway model slim (far from it, that's just as unhealthy), but the anguish that truly obese people suffer is sad to see. And I've seen it first hand from a couple of friends. I wish I could put it more eloquently, but all I can say is its simply a bad thing to have your fellow humans suffer this way. I realize all you people of steel have no time or sympathy for others who "lack personal responsibility" or are "weak willed", but others of us do have some empathy and would like to see things get better for people like this.

      *http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health/nutrit/pubs/sta tobes.htm#preval

  37. The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's thousand island dressing. With a little tiny amount of extra pickle in it.

    "'Cause Knowledge is power!" ;-)

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh your dead pal! Dead! No ONE GIVES AWAY OUR SECRETS! My suggestion: If you see a clown YOU'D BETTER FUCKING RUN!

    2. Re:The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by king-manic · · Score: 1

      It's thousand island dressing. With a little tiny amount of extra pickle in it.

      I always thought thousand island normally had pickles in it.

      I prefer my burgers with Mayo. Yes I do live Canada why do you ask?

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by bmalia · · Score: 1

      Isn't the ingredients to thousand island dressing like mayo, ketchup, mustand, and pickle? So its not really that weird on a burger

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    4. Re:The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by parcel · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is true or not, but I found this the other day:

      Big Mac Sauce Recipe

      This recipe is from the 1968 McDonald's Manager's Handbook put out in 1969 (1968 year) They quickly removed the recipe after realizing they had a very appealing "secret sauce." It was included as an emergency recipe in the event a particular store ran out of the pre-made sauce. Enjoy!

    5. Re:The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      Looks plausible enough, right down to the maniacal fast food manager's voice:

      Mix everything very well in a small container. There better be no streaks!

    6. Re:The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had microwaves in 1968??!!

    7. Re:The secret of the special sauce, revealed! by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Close: http://www.topsecretrecipes.com/recipes/1000isle.h tm

      Chris

  38. Wait a minute by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hmmm, let's see, about 600 calories in a Big Mac, an average of 12 songs on a CD, so that's about 7200 calories you will need to consume in order to get an album's worth of music

    You forgot to factor in what scientists and dieticians like to refer to as the BAAM factor (not to be confused with Emeril's BAM!). Which many believe is McDonalds way to actually decrease the weight of their customers, a diet of sorts.

    BAAM is expanded as Barf At Abhorrent Music, which would not only eliminate the 600 Big Mac calories, but whatever else that had not yet been digested. Depending on which Pop band's CD you buy, you can actually end up at negative calories for the day.

    1. Re:Wait a minute by Alsee · · Score: 1

      you can actually end up at negative calories for the day.

      Would that be the Ally McBeal McMeal?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  39. McDonald's is worse than Hitler by borg1238 · · Score: 1

    Sigh, not another reason for to complain about how McDonald's is making people fat.

    When are people going to take some personal responsibility and realize McDonald's doesn't have a gun to your head, forcing you to cram Big Mac's down your gullet.

    Here's a thought: stop eating fast food for every meal, and exercise every once in a while, you fat fucks.

  40. Don't eat the food by fermion · · Score: 2, Informative
    It seems that for some of the exclusive offers, such as the disney characters, it has been reported that adults will buy the meals and then, quite sensible, throw the so-called food away and keep the toy.

    And, BTW, a big mac extra value meal is probably closer to 1000-1500 calories depending on the drink. For those that don't know, that supplies at least 75% of the calories that many of us need for the entire day, as well as most of the fat. However, it supplies much less than 50% many other nutrients.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  41. Continuation of collaboration.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is only continuation of their great symbiosis. Even recently, if you do not feel very well after going to McDonalds, you can not be sure it was caused by BigMac or Britney you were feed with during the visit.

  42. Why not just download it for free by bensin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why waste time at Mc Donald's when there are tons of free websites giving the music away for free anyways. For instance http://www.myglobalsound.com has new free music for download every month. I mean Pepsi did it with Apple and they did it right way the first time. In my opinion this Mc Donald's and Sony deal is just not going to work out as expected. I'm not going to buy a big just cause I want free song. Having to collected piece to go to a website and use is no good. The best way is like Apple and Pepsi did it you either win or lose instantly.

    1. Re:Why not just download it for free by Skidge · · Score: 1

      iTunes Music Store is currently giving away one free song (of their choice) a week, as well. Granted, most of them so far have been fairly average pop songs, but a couple haven't been that bad.

  43. Fast Food is not the enemy... by TEMM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Excessive consumption of fast food IS the enemy. It is easy to blame people health problems on fast food companies but when it comes down to it, the problem is really with the mental state of people today. We want everything right now, and we want LOTS of it. If everyone ate fast food in moderation and got some exercise there wouldnt be any problem. The same goes with drinking, drugs, partying, eating OTHER food, sex, porn.. etc etc etc... Its all too east to OVERindulge in something that has the perceived benefit of being fast, or makes you feel good. There is a healthy balance, and once people figure this out there wont be a problem anymore. But we dont have to worry about that happening anytime soon. I personally think we should worry about cutting down on people smoking. More people die annually because of smoking then they do of obiesity. If we can get people to give up smoking, which people have been doing for ages, it should be easy enough to get people to realize the dangers of eating fast foor every day.

    1. Re:Fast Food is not the enemy... by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 1

      There is some evidence that most people don't want LOTS of fast food, but the fast food companies have increased portion sizes because it's the easiest way to increase 'value', and people will eat what they buy. If McDonald's had increased the quality of their food rather than the quantity, they wouldn't be fighting such a PR battle now.

    2. Re:Fast Food is not the enemy... by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Excessive consumption of fast food IS the enemy.

      Is McDonald's marketed as an indulgence, or as something that should be daily consumed? Here are the themes from McDonald's advertising:

      McDonald's is Your Kind of Place (1967)
      You Deserve a Break Today (1971)
      We Do it All for You (1975)
      Twoallbeefpattiesspecialsaucelettucecheese pickleso nionsonasesameseedbun (1975)
      You, You're The One (1976)
      Nobody Can Do It Like McDonald's Can (1979)
      Renewed: You Deserve a Break Today (1980 & 1981)
      Nobody Makes Your Day Like McDonald's Can (1981)
      McDonald's and You (1983)
      It's a Good Time for the Great Taste of McDonald's (1984)
      Good Time, Great Taste, That's Why This is My Place (1988)
      Food, Folks and Fun (1990)
      McDonald's Today (1991)
      What You Want is What You Get (1992)
      Have you Had your Break Today? (1995)
      My McDonald's (1997)
      Did Somebody Say McDonald's (1997)
      We Love to See You Smile (2000)

      Notice the themes of "Today", and "everyday good feelings"? Do McDonald's ads portray the reality of eating its food on a daily basis?

    3. Re:Fast Food is not the enemy... by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
      All things in moderation, including moderation. :)

      The problem is that some of these problem items have addictive qualities. Before the modern tobacco companies, lots of people smoked and dipped (snuff boxes in the 1800s). There was no (additional) nicotine in tobacco then, therefore people did not smoke more and more. After the addition of nicotine, smoking becomes addictive, and companies profit.

      People in general ate mostly fruits, vegetables, and grains before pre-packaged foods added massive quantities of fat, corn syrup, and salt into our diets. Kudos for convenience, but the health impact is easy to see, especially as families cook from raw ingredients less and less. But, fat and sweet makes it "taste good", so we eat it like its going out of style.

      As far as music, I think there is some addictive substance they add to music that makes most people listen to and like pop trite. Maybe it has something to do with listening to music while eating...

    4. Re:Fast Food is not the enemy... by MagicM · · Score: 1

      people will eat what they buy

      I don't know that that's true. Virtually every American restaurant gives you oversized portions. They also give you the option of getting a container so you can take left-overs home with you.
      McDonald's burgers (or at least the Big Mac) come in their own take-home container! Why should people feel like they have to eat their entire meal, when they don't feel that need at a 'good' restaurant?

    5. Re:Fast Food is not the enemy... by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Dude, whatever. All companies have slogans that suggest this kind of thing.

      So, what you really are saying is that McDonald's isn't evil...but all corporations are evil.

      You're right!! Down with inovation! Down with capitalism! Down with society! I'm boycotting everything, join me!

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    6. Re:Fast Food is not the enemy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time you're having too much sex is when it begins to interfere with your regular life, ie. you're addicted. It's certainly not too bad a condition to be in.

  44. Pepsi vs Mc Donalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both are bad. Big Mac.. 600 calories. Can of pepsi.. 13 teaspons of sugar! Both are contributing to the Super Size populance that are the majority in America.

    I guess they are just once again looking for the sheep. People stupid enough to drink pop and eat mc donalds must also be stupid enough to buy music online when with an extra click or 2 they could get it for FREE!

  45. It's even worse... by petepac · · Score: 1

    Remember it's an Extra Value MEAL.

    Big Mac = 600
    Medium Fries = 350
    Medium Coke = 210
    -----------------------
    Total = 1,160 Calories

    One 12 track CD = 13,920 CALORIES!!!!

    You can feed a third world county's village with that calorie count.

    --
    >> Practice Safe Hex
  46. After by quinkin · · Score: 1
    After

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  47. Only supports Windows by Ryan+O'Rourke · · Score: 1
    FYI, the Sony Connect service only supports Windows.
    From the Download page:

    We're sorry.

    We know you are interested in using the Connect music store. Unfortunately SonicStage only works on Windows 98SE and above.

    We have no immediate plans to support other operating systems at this time. However, we believe this is an important user base and we hope to support it in the future.

    Thank you for your interest.

  48. Standing Tech Support Issue With Sony by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

    How can I get it to work with my iPod?

    If it can't, then I don't care. I paid $500 for that ipod and I'm not going to pay even more for a silly Sony device. And the last Sony Device I bought was my Clie, wow you got to love their support for products.

    Ted Tschopp
    p.s. It's called sarcasim.

    --
    Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
  49. Windows 98SE or higher? by ylikone · · Score: 2, Funny

    When going to the download section of the site, I just get a message saying something like "You need to run Windows 98SE or higher, we have no intention on making this work on other OS's so screw you". But I'm running Linux, which is definitely higher than Windows 98SE!

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Windows 98SE or higher? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering what's missing from Windows 98 (first edition?)? I don't remember any amazing technologies other than the fast shutdown that didn't disconnect network connections properly and caused freezing on many computers. This place I worked at had this computer. The shutdown process was start, shutdown, okay, wait..., unplug computer.

      Keep in mind this is a promotion, so it's probably not worth it at all for them to make a linux port of this software that facilitates the downloading. Now of course they could just run it all through the browser and ensure platform independence, but then how would they enforce their DRM?

      It's probably better for them that they don't cater (no pun intended) to the linux crowd. They'd have to train their crack staff on how to handle arguments such as

      "What?? This is DRM'ed? Let me explain how things should be..."

      or

      "Windows? Why are you forcing your closed source proprietary crap..."

      Their PR department is too busy dealing with this "health thing" to need to worry about that.

    2. Re:Windows 98SE or higher? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that me here on my 486 Linux server with a Bash prompt, slrn and Usenet access onto alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.* will have to sit here downloading music for free instead then?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  50. And the artist get . . . by JustAnotherReader · · Score: 2, Funny
    CNet reports that McDonalds and Sony are teaming up to offer free music downloads to customers who buy a Big Mac Extra Value Meal

    The artist who wrote, performed, recorded, published, and promoted the music will get a coupon for a free super size upgrade.

  51. It's funny, but it's not "good". by Otto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I haven't seen it yet (I'm waiting to finish "Fast Food Nation" first) but I hear it's good.

    It's very funny and well made, but his point utterly fails. First off, he does something inordinately stupid.. he comes up with "rules" that virtually guarantee he'll eat the biggest, most fattening thing that they offer. And then when he becomes sick, he expects you to have not expected this in the first place.

    This is one of those "well, duh" moments. It's like when researchers announce that they've done some 3 years of studies and found that kids don't like to go to school. Well, duh.

    If you eat nasty fattening shit all day, every day, you won't be healthy. If you override your body's desires for foods that it needs with some arbitrary set of rules, you won't be healthy.

    Health isn't a matter of what kind of foods you eat. Not really. Health is a matter of balance. Sometimes you need fat in your meal. Other times you need salad. If you eat the same damn thing all the time, it doesn't matter *what* it is, you're not eating healthy by definition.

    He's trying to make a point that this food is unhealthy. In this, he fails miserably. The food is not unhealthy. His behavior in eating nothing but that food is unhealthy. If he wanted to prove that any particular chain was unhealthy, he should have tried to eat a balanced diet using only foods from that chain. They have a big menu for a friggin' reason. They do offer salads. They do offer healthy choices (admittedly, not many). Just because they offer a lot of fatty foods doesn't mean you have to eat nothing but those fatty foods.

    So the movie, while funny, utterly fails to make any commentary that has any real meaning. It's a mockumentary at best. He didn't actually prove anything that anybody wouldn't have known from hearing the premise. "Well, duh."

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by neoform · · Score: 1

      "The food is not unhealthy."

      Umm, so you're saying McDonald's food IS healthy? Sorry, but that's gotta be a joke.. and he didn't go out of his way to eat the worst food on the menu.. he went and ate EVERY food on the menu.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    2. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by tribulation2004 · · Score: 1
      He's trying to make a point that this food is unhealthy. In this, he fails miserably. The food is not unhealthy. His behavior in eating nothing but that food is unhealthy. If he wanted to prove that any particular chain was unhealthy, he should have tried to eat a balanced diet using only foods from that chain. They have a big menu for a friggin' reason. They do offer salads.

      I have to disagree with a few of your statements. There are many, many studies showing that a mixture of about 45-65% calories from carbs, 15-30% calories from fat, 15-30% calories from protein is the right mix of food. With a cap on simple carbs (sugars) and sodium (say 2000-2500mg). Although not specifically spelled out, the movie makes the point that it is (was?) simply not possible to eat a healthy diet within those guidelines at McDonalds (which advertises that it can be part of a healthy lifestyle). You are right in saying his food selection was awful - but I would put forth that had the experiment been extended to 6 months, even consuming the healthiest diet possible at McD's would have led to the same results (throw in life-threatening high blood pressure too). Simply put, your argument that the food is not unhealthy is incorrect. Even their healthiest choices contain much too much salt. Throw in the chain's highly questionable approach to food safety (see "Fast Food Nation" by Schloesser), and you've got a very unhealthy place to eat.

      The experiment (eating only McDonald's food for an extended amount of time) is dangerous no matter what the diet itself consists of (although admittedly it could be made less dangerous by selecting a better variety of food). I thought the movie was at least as reasonable/fair an argument against eating fast food often as the fast food industry's advertising touting the health benefits of eating in their restaurants (for a good example, consider KFC's carb-conscious advertising which features bodybuilders eating a bucket of chicken).

    3. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by iconian · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone doubts that McDonald's (and other fast food junk food) is bad. The thing is that many things in life are "bad for you". Alcohol is bad for you. Smoking is bad for you. The question that we should be asking is NOT whether or not something is bad for you BUT RATHER how bad is it? Is eating 1 Extra Value Meal the same as smoking a cigarette in terms of your risk for heart disease? My feeling is that many folks don't consider an Extra Value Meal as bad for you as a cigarette. I don't know if that's true or whether one can even quantify in those terms. But this is the type of questions that we as consumers should be asking.

      Putting foods in the health/unhealthy dichotomy is just too black & white. Imagine that you only have 10 minutes to grab lunch. And say that your choices are getting a Big Mac or a cream cheese bagel. Big Macs and cream cheese are both bad for you. Now let's say that you know that a Big Mac is like smoking a pack of cigarettes. How would that affect your decision?

    4. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by miltimj · · Score: 1

      All I have is one word: Jared.

      It *does* matter what you eat, even if it's the same thing every day.

      Granted, I think you do need a balance, but a sub is more likely to provide that balance than a BigMac anyway.

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    5. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

      So the movie, while funny, utterly fails to make any commentary that has any real meaning. It's a mockumentary at best. He didn't actually prove anything that anybody wouldn't have known from hearing the premise.

      I agree. I'll bet you could eat every meal at McDonalds and remain perfectly healthy. Eat a lot of salads and a variety of protein sources, chicken, fish and beef. That's not so different from my Atkins diet and my triglyceride levels have never been better.

      It would be an interesting experiment and you could even make a documentary about it. But you know what? It would be a commercial flop. Good news never sells.

    6. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by rsklnkv · · Score: 1

      "The food is not unhealthy." You meant to say this!?! You seriously believe that eating even one big mac, yes even just one big mac, is HEALTHY!?! Where are you getting this health innformation? Please tell us, becuase I like to try and eat helthy and I would love to get a big mac if it's good for me. Or did you mean that it is not UNhealthy? Which is different somehow..?

      --
      _____ "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- Orwell
    7. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by satsujin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, he does prove his point, and does it quite well.

      His point is that McD does not properly inform consumers of the fat content in their food. He uses a number of examples in the different McD shops to show that the nutritional info isn't clearly displayed.
      Try it for yourself. Ask to see the nutritional info chart at McD.

      You also assume that everyone knows that the food is bad for you. This is clearly not the case, as shown in the film (and backed up by a number of studies, which are also cited in Schlosser's Fast Food Nation)

      Also, the "rules" that he establishes were not arbitrarily chosen, but were based on a court decision that stated that McD's food was perfectly fine to eat for every meal of every day.

      Are you sure you saw the same film?

    8. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what was really shocking was how quickly his health declined. In only one month he gained 24 1/2 pounds. Towards the end, one doctor insisted that he should stop. His liver was filling with fat and it was headed for failure. I doubt it's coincidence that a few weeks after the file premiered McDonald's announced they were eliminating super-sizing.

    9. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by Otto · · Score: 1

      All I have is one word: Jared.

      It *does* matter what you eat, even if it's the same thing every day.

      Granted, I think you do need a balance, but a sub is more likely to provide that balance than a BigMac anyway.


      Jared is a marketing gimmick.

      And yes, it does matter what you eat. But it matters in the context of the total diet, not in the individual choices of food.

      Is it healthy to eat the same thing all the time? Most likely, no. Doesn't matter what it is, nothing provides everything you need to survive.

      Can you lose weight by eating the same thing continously? Sure. If that meal is lacking in several things you need, your body will draw on stored resources to keep you alive, and guess what? You lose weight.

      Can you gain weight by eating the same thing continously? Sure. If that meal has excessive amounts of resources, your body will store them and convert them to fats and other things. And you'll gain weight.

      Balance is key though. If you want to maintain your current weight, or stay healthy overall, you have to eat what your body needs at any given moment. And there's a million years of evolution that will tell you exactly what you need at the moment. Your body knows what it needs. You just have to pay attention.

      Overly simplistic example: Chocolate. It's good. But is it always good? Can you eat chocolate all the time? I know that if I have more than a few pieces, it stops tasting quite so good. Oh, the taste is the same, but the body tells the brain some things and the brain stops liking it as much. This is the type of signal that people should learn to pay attention to...

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    10. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by Otto · · Score: 1

      His point is that McD does not properly inform consumers of the fat content in their food. He uses a number of examples in the different McD shops to show that the nutritional info isn't clearly displayed.

      That was supposed to be his point? That throwaway 5 minute bit in the middle of movie? C'mon, pull the other one, it's got bells on.

      Try it for yourself. Ask to see the nutritional info chart at McD.

      Don't have to. It's posted on the wall. Been there for at least the last 4 years. Maybe he wasn't looking hard enough or something. I've never failed to see it when I was looking around waiting in line.

      Now, I grant you, I don't eat a lot of McD's. The food tastes like week old sawdust to me. But that's a matter of my personal taste. I eat there less than once a year. Doesn't mean the movie is not a joke in terms of making a statement.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    11. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go look at McDonald's Nutritional facts:

      http://www.mcdonalds.com/app_controller.nutritio n. categories.nutrition.index.html

      Most of their salads have the same level of saturated fats as their sandwiches. There is no such thing as a healthy meal at McDonalds.

    12. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by chickenmonger · · Score: 1

      Nutrition Chart? It's right next to the coffee condiment station, sir. Yep, next to the far right register.

      /me tips own McDonald's crew hat.

    13. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by Groovus · · Score: 1
      Also, the "rules" that he establishes were not arbitrarily chosen, but were based on a court decision that stated that McD's food was perfectly fine to eat for every meal of every day.
      Point, Set and Match. The original poster conveniently left out the entire impetus for the film which was the above. The original poster also misrepresents other parts of the film. How the original poster got modded up to where it is is beyond me - it's a straw man comment. Besides, even if you think you knew the food was bad for you, I don't think most of us realized HOW bad it could be for you - which was a very important result of this film.
    14. Re:It's funny, but it's not "good". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you throw away about half of what you're paying for. Like the buns, and the sugary sauces and salad dressings. None of it's cheap either, particularly the salads (how much does iceberg lettuce cost, anyway?).

      Your triglyceride levels may be fine, but how are your blood proteins? The problem with a low-carb diet is that it convinces the body of scarcity, and it starts scavenging protein, which is easier than turning to fat. I'm related to a physician, who has seen worryingly low serum protein counts in more than one Atkins dieter. Unfortunately the test isn't usually performed unless you're admitted for something else, but it's worth keeping track of for the long term.

      That said, any diet will cause you to lose weight and can be healthy if you simply eat a reasonable amount of calories and get all the micronutrients you need. The benefit of any diet is simply that it gets people to pay a bit of attention to their diet where before they probably weren't paying any - the specifics of what they eat really don't matter as much as people think they do. Of course in the case of many Atkins dieters that turns into a fanatical amount of attention, and a mention of the virtues of their diet in any thread of conversation remotely concerning food - or anything else. ;)

  52. Shoulda teamed up with Apple... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    Since they both make Macs.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  53. Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't we change the name to FREEDOM fries?

  54. Old Commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dude, is that Fridom rock?
    Well turn it up!!!

  55. Comparatively is it that different? by funkdid · · Score: 1

    Pepsi was giving away the free iTunes downloads. If you compare a bottle of pepsi to a bottle of water, I think we're in the same ballpark. On it's own a bottle of pepsi isn't so bad, what are we comparing the BigMac lunch to? If you're the type that drinks pepsi like it's water you probably eat McDonald's often enough to know what time of year the McDonald's Monopoly game comes out. Or at least can rattle off the top of your head how much any fast food meal is with tax to within 5 cents. Seems like a similar target audience. Personally, I stay away from fast food and paying for music when I can. :-)

    --

    I boycott signatures

  56. Rock and roll McDonald's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my god...
    wesley willis saw it coming...

    rock and roll mcdonalds

  57. Apple by EnsilZah · · Score: 1
    "...offer free music downloads to customers who buy a Big Mac Extra Value Meal."

    Wouldn't it make more sense if they did that for iTunes? =P
  58. Actually by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    1 cup of lard is 1850 calories, so you'd only have to eat 3.89 cups (.9208 litres) of yummy yummy lard, less depending on how many cokes you wash it down with.

    Getting hungry just thinking about it. Wonder if I can get McDonalds to offer a McLard combo, with a side of extra lard. That would definitely get me the "McLardass of the Year" trophy.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Actually by CmdrMooCow · · Score: 1

      lol...

      I was going to mod this, but there wasnt a -1 Nausiating

  59. What? by shackma2 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the McDonalds super sizes you!! In Soviet Russia, the Music pirates you!! In Soviet Russia, the fast food eats you!! In Soviet Russia, the cliches write you!! Just curious though, what started this cliche?

    1. Re:What? by Mitleid · · Score: 1

      It was some joke said by 80s comic Yakov Schmirnoff (sp?), however I never remember the exact. Maybe a more enlightened chap (or gal) here on slashdot can help us both out...

      Eh? Eh?

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    2. Re:What? by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      Just curious though, what started this cliche?

      Someone may well correct me, but I think it has its roots in the comedian Yakov Smirnov (sp?) who used a similar bit in his routines to describe how backward things were in Soviet Russia compared to the U.S.

  60. Re:What happened - health food at McD's? by djtack · · Score: 1

    I thought McDonald's was supposed to start promoting it's more healthier meals now?

    I saw the funniest thing at a McDonald's last weekend... they were selling an "Adult Happy Meal". It was a bunch of iceberg lettuce, a bottle of water, and a pedometer!

    I wish I was making this up... but it's true.

  61. Great Idea!! by d474 · · Score: 1

    Get down to Phat Tracks while McDonalds puts you on the Fat Track!

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  62. My girlfriend bought one... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    they aren't even worth the $0.25 that they must have cost - the pedometer couldn't count steps accurately, or even close (about one step read for every three taken). So, unless you believe that Republican budget math is accurate (in which case these will work just fine at counting your steps in the same way), the McPedometers don't work well and aren't worth the plastic they're made of. The coroner won't be able to get anything out of the Adult Happy Meal pedometer after your untimely demise other than that you should have eaten somewhere other than McD's instead.

    1. Re:My girlfriend bought one... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      NT. Please note that *all* politicians, not just republicrats, claim that a decrease in growth is a loss. Demopublicans do it too. "We're only increasing taxes by 5% this year, which means we're really lowering taxes as last year we raised them 7%"

    2. Re:My girlfriend bought one... by mikael · · Score: 1

      The pedometers simply count the number of vertical accelerations/deaccelerations you've made. I guess there's a weight held in place by two springs. Whenever it crosses a certain threshold (around 1cm/sec.)that counts as one step. Larger steps probably make the weight oscillate and count as multiple steps.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:My girlfriend bought one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's about what it's supposed to count. The manual says it should read a count of about 1000 per mile. For a 5'9" person, that's about 2000 steps (i.e. 1000 paces).

  63. McDonalds bashing by gaijin62 · · Score: 1

    Sure McDonalds food sucks, but why all the bashing?
    Pepsi gave out free itunes song with cola purchase.
    Nobody complained about that.
    I mean what is the sugar content of a cola? It sure can not be good for you.

  64. Why I hate product tie-ins by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    I want to be able to get 99 cents off of the price if I don't want the song. That's the disturbing thing here... McDonald's is NOT paying 99 cents per song, so why should we have to???

    --
    stuff |
  65. I would buy a lot of McDonalds if by lancomandr · · Score: 1

    they offered X games of DDR per X unit of shitty food. Dance dance revolution is a great way to burn some fat but its expensive. I think it would be a good idea for McDonalds to try something like that. I think its interesting that they're promoting this in such a time. I thought part of their new 'health' campaign was discouraging purchase of their higher calorie meals. I know at least locally too, they downsized the fry containers.

    --

    "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"

  66. Well, I know one thing gor sure! by switcha · · Score: 1

    I won't support them until they offer Ogg! And I don't mean an Ogg McMuffin!

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  67. lame sue by javcrapa · · Score: 1

    Good point, as far as I know the us is one of the countries with the lamest excuses to sue someone, if someone eats junk food and gets fat, they sue mcdonalds and they win! wow, lame 1-Eat junk food all day long 2-??????? 3-Profit!

    1. Re:lame sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's illegal. 3 Cheers for corporate "democracy"!

      Just wait till a similar "Linux Bill" or, better yet, "Freedom Bill" - no suing the government over loss of personal freedom, because hey, people should just deal with it, right? Do what Ronald says and be a good boy. And get a free toy, too!

  68. Deal? or "The fat capatalist perspective" by zelurxunil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Set aside the sucky iTunes song quality, and the fact they screw over musicians. , and setting aside that Fatty Fast foods are addicting, and bad for you. The cost of a Big Mac is in upwards of 3 dollars, and one song on iTunes is $1.00. Why not buy two songs from iTunes, and go buy a hot dog from a hot dog stand.

    --

    What's another word for Thesaurus?
    -Steve Wright
    1. Re:Deal? or "The fat capatalist perspective" by mattkime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wait....so its Apple's fault that musicians have contracts with the music industry that control how much they make per song? And Apple's evil for taking 35 cents out of every song - just to cover expenses?

      And how do you support musicians? By writing them a personal check?

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    2. Re:Deal? or "The fat capatalist perspective" by Night+Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read that downhill battle site and thought the same thing. Why single out the Apple Music Store when the real problem is that musicians are signing contracts that give them a raw deal? Fuck that noise.

    3. Re:Deal? or "The fat capatalist perspective" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, and Hot Dogs are a wealth of nutrient, espcially ones that have been floating in some juice all day.

      that link to the downhillbattle about the iTunes is crap.
      example:
      "First of all, Apple gets 3 times as much money as musicians from each sale. Apple takes a 35% cut from every song and every album sold, a huge amount considering how little they have to do."

      Clearly the writter has never had to maintain a eCommerce site that gets millions of hits. It is expensive. I would truly be surpised if apple profit as much as a nicke with each download.

      Artist on the other hand have NOTHING to do after the song has been created.

      then it goes on to complain about things Apple has no control over.

      I had never seen that site before, and clearly there agenda is to make apple look bad no matter what. They spot trivial things like its the end of the world. No I am not an iTune 'fan boy', and I have not owned an Apple product for 20 years, but that is just a bad site.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  69. A rant answering a rant... by Mitleid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really don't think anyone is eating healthier or dieting... Take a look around, America is still a pretty fat place. The recent jazz about the Atkins diet is just that; jazz. Diets like that have no lasting effects because people do not learn the CONCEPTS before they implement. They hear "Atkins sez: Don't eat bread, eat meat!" so they go eat 2 lbs of ground beef wrapped in cheese and covered with bacon. "It's cool", they say. "...No BREAD!".

    I was a vegetarian for about 4 years of my life, and it made me much more selective and concious of what I was eating, and thus I lost a considerable amount of weight and became more aware of my body's needs calorically, etc. Then, about 2 years ago, I went back to eating meat, and ballooned up at least 20 pounds. Why? Because it just became food food food all over again. Burgers, steaks, whatever. Much like you stated with the common American food consumption mentality, you get in a mindset where it becomes so hard to moderate yourself, you really lose a grip on your food intake and just go hog wild. Even an INCREDIBLY active person can not sucessfully maintain a healthy body if they were to participate in the diet of "fat" Americans.

    I went back to being a vegetarian about 3 months ago and have also gotten my ass on a treadmill, and I'm starting to shed off those pounds I gained from when I started eating meat again. I'm not advocating that vegetarianism is the means to lose weight here. Rather, I'm just stating that personally, for me, being a vegetarian puts me in a mindset where I'm just so much more concious of what I'm eating that I see HOW BAD most food sold in America really is. And the sad thing is, it seems people aren't necessarily always living to eat rather than eating to live, but they just can't get a decent healthy meal anywhere else.

    --

    --
    Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    1. Re:A rant answering a rant... by dustman · · Score: 1

      Diets like that have no lasting effects because people do not learn the CONCEPTS before they implement. They hear "Atkins sez: Don't eat bread, eat meat!" so they go eat 2 lbs of ground beef wrapped in cheese and covered with bacon. "It's cool", they say. "...No BREAD!".

      The Atkins diet is a lot more than just jazz, because it works. (It's weird, because every diet scam always says this, but there is overwhelming evidence that low carb diets work).

      If you only ever ate "2 lbs of ground beef wrapped in cheese and covered in bacon", you would probably lose weight. (For a couple of weeks anyway, before you died of a heart attack).

      The Atkins proponents are *not* saying that it's a balanced diet. The whole point is that it *is* unbalanced, and it needs to be, because you have been eating a different sort of unbalanced diet for years. After you get your weight back to what it should, you can return to a balanced diet.

      Although I have not tried it, the "South Beach" diet is apparently a low carbohydrate diet which is more geared to being healthy, rather than just losing weight.

    2. Re:A rant answering a rant... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      It's less about content and more about quantity. North Americans eat portions that they should not. And they get used to it so only that much will fill them mentally while they need 1/3 that to fill them biologically. Vegetarians lose weight because no matter how much Lettuce and fruit you eat, you inevitably eat less calories.

      When I went to the philipines, each meal I had at any place I went to was just about the right size. My drinks were about a cup of pop not the 3 cups you get in a medium or even the 2 cups of pop in every can.

      Thats why the French can eat Fat wrapped Fat with a melted fat dip and extra fat on the side, because it's in a small enough portion that it's not going to kill them.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:A rant answering a rant... by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 1

      My parents are on the South Beach diet (most of the time). The way it works is that you cut out carbs for the first couple of weeks and slowly reintroduce them into your diet. It is geared towards losing weight in the beginning, but leads to healthier eating habits in the end. Like you said, it is about being healthier and not about losing weight.

  70. Its not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    if i have to buy something in order to get it
    blatently false advertising if thats how they are pitching it

  71. don't make me do it! by V_drive · · Score: 1

    the triple bypass is also cursed. ...sorry it had to come to that.

    --
    char *mySig;
  72. Apple denied Rumor by razmaspaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't apple deny a rumor about McDonalds using their site around the time they signed the pepsi deal? Interesting. I guess McDonalds really was shopping for a music service promo. Too bad, it would have been cool to get iTunes on your BigMac (Sorry that was bad but had to be said)

    --
    I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
  73. time for a PWEI revival.... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
    Big Mac, fries to go...
    Get me Big Mac, fries to go...
    Get me Big Mac, fries to go...
    Get me Big Mac, get me fries to go...

    Def Con One

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    1. Re:time for a PWEI revival.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa...memory time.

      They kicked ass, but I guess that whole genre (and I don't mean "grebo", but the whole industrial thing) just sorted of faded away 15 years ago.

    2. Re:time for a PWEI revival.... by von+Prufer · · Score: 1

      Those really are the memories. I didn't think I'd find a Poppies fan on Slashdot.

  74. 7200 calories = ~2 lbs by altek · · Score: 1

    IIRC, 3500 calories is about a pound of weight gain! Of course, that's 3500 unused calories..

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  75. Timberlake? by gUmbi · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, your free song is Justin Timerlake's 'I'm lovin' it'.

  76. In-N-Out Burger by Bob-o-Matic! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are right-- in the USA's culture of convenience, "Fast Food Nation" is essential reading. For those who think it is just about the ingredients (yes, there is shit in the beef), you are missing 90% of the issue. Go spend a few bucks on the book-- it will open your eyes to the incredible influence of the fast food industry. All of which is entirely funded by the one in four Americans who eats fast food everyday without giving it a second thought.

    I think I spent maybe $6.50 on this book at Costco. I have gained priceless insight on a very mundane part of everyday life, and have made much better decisions about since then.

    As I read the book (I have a second or later edition, with updates), I noted the omission of comments about In-N-Out Burger. At the end of the book, Schlosser mentions how In-N-Out Burger is completely unlike all of the other fast food chains, especially with regards to the food itself.

    This was particularly pleasing to me, as I have always thought that In-N-Out Burger is *so much* better than any other fast food hamburger, and their fries are fantastic, too. Every time I have visited there has always been a long line, but the wait is short, and the food is absolutely worth it-- regular, or "animal style".

    I so wish they would expand their business eastward. They would destroy Whataburger (sawdust buger, methinks. even the chicken) and even Sonic here in San Antonio.

    BTW-- even back in 1999 I recall seeing signs that they were hiring new employees in Gilroy near the outlet shopping center at over $11/hour.

    1. Re:In-N-Out Burger by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Was it In-N-Out or Chik-fil-a that Schlosser held up as a high standard in employee treatment? Managers making excellent wages, college tuition reimbursement, health plan available for all employees, etc.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:In-N-Out Burger by jamesdood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After reading FFN, I would have to agree that fast food industry is not a happy place, but the fact is it's not going anywhere. Advertising creates demand . As for In N Out, yeah they rock! I was very happy that they opened resturaunts in Arizona! Even my kids won't eat McNasty burgers now they have had In N Out.. worth the drive, worth the wait for FRESH food. Also I have seen there job postings, $9/hr to start! and people who are happy working there tend to produce a better product. (How much *Good* code would you write for $5.35 hr?)

      --
      *narf!*
    3. Re:In-N-Out Burger by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      This is kind of interesting:

      People being down on corporatism - buy the book! At the biggest store you can find! Um, isn't the publishing industry heavily dosed corporatism, one that stands to gain something if they exaggerate things to get people riled up to buy a book to find what they are upset about? Don't laugh, take a look at the glut of partisan books out there now.

      What happened to the library again?

    4. Re:In-N-Out Burger by Bob-o-Matic! · · Score: 1

      What happened to the library again?

      Let's see-- I paid for the book, hopefully providing some sort of compensation for Schlosser's efforts-- the result of which I value.

      Next, I lent the book to friends, who also were impressed enough to buy their own copies.

      Lastly, I live in San Antonio-- I can find *much* larger brick and mortar store, but that doesn't mean anything. What does mean something to me is that I have the choice to spend my dollars at a predatory, consumer-hostile store like Walmart (I loathe that place- low quality in every aspect), or I can go to Costco where there is an established record of quality from start to finish-- people don't act as if the parking lot is a bumper car pen, the store is clean, well lit (with natural light, no less), the aisles are plenty wide and free of obstacles, the products they carry are without exception high quality and priced as low as you can find them at any brick and mortar in new condition, and the return policy is generous.

      Maybe it is just me, but I feel that Costco is the only large general retail store that really values its members/customers. Sam's Club is nowhere near as good. I'd rather gargle broken glass than go to Walmart...

      While I don't profess to know all that much about Costco's corporate policies and track record (I don't have that kind of time), but I would say that from what I know, Costco would be a great place to work. I think they are doing things the right way.

      As for your bullshit about corporatism, why don't you cut the power lines to your cave? Surely you don't want to support the evil Enron-like corporations that bring Johnny Electron straight to your home (for a modest fee in terms of dollars and environmental damage), do you? Why don't you just unplug yourself from the Matrix (TM) and leave the rest of us in the real world (where there are corporations, run by real people, some of whom may actually be benevolent while making a few bucks for the stockholders and employees) the hell alone?

      If you don't like some industry, do some research on it and illustrate for us (for free, even!) how it should be of immediate concern. Or maybe you are a "rebel without a clue". "Damn the man!"

      [ok-- let me apologize in advance for not writing a coherent reply-- your response struck a nerve as in my pathetic life here in San Antonio (by far the most pathetic large city imagineable in terms of variety) Costco is consistantly the best place to shop.]

    5. Re:In-N-Out Burger by FanaticalDesperado · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about In-N-Out because I haven't read the book and I've never even heard of In-N-Out. But, Chik-fil-a has a good reputation about how they treat their employees. Managers do make good wages. They offer tuition reimbursement. All Chik-fil-a restaurants are closed on sundays so the employees can attend church if they want to. I'm not sure about the health plan though.

    6. Re:In-N-Out Burger by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about In-N-Out because I haven't read the book and I've never even heard of In-N-Out. But, Chik-fil-a has a good reputation about how they treat their employees. Managers do make good wages. They offer tuition reimbursement. All Chik-fil-a restaurants are closed on sundays so the employees can attend church if they want to.

      Isn't that interesting? Most of the people here at /. love to bash Christians. Christians who just so happen to "do the right thing" when it comes to their businesses and treatment of their employees. I find that ironic.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  77. Re:What happened - health food at McD's? by Xtraneous · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Except that they call their pedometer a 'stepometer'.

    God I hate it how they dumb things down for Americans.

    --
    .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  78. Would you like an angioplasty with that download? by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

    Because you deserve a (heart attack/stroke/bmi above 40) today.

  79. You are actually forgetting... by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    You are actually forgetting that target market doesn't want all of the tracks on the CD; they only want one or two singles. So, the health risk isn't as bad as you noted. : )

    -Slashdot Junky

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  80. It's all over for innovators by teutonic_leech · · Score: 1

    Guess I'm coming a bit late to this discussion, but as someone who spent months working on a commercial P2P distribution network, I can't help but getting depressed reading news clips like this. So, after years of back and forth, law suits, and killing off of small innovators, it's all come down to behemoths like Sony and McDonalds? This is really sick - just another proof that the new territory has been fully occupied by the usual suspects - the large corporate conglomerates who can bribe and push themselves into a market niche. F...ing depressing - why would I ever come up with anything innovative anymore and try to realize it? I know there are some exceptions out there (Yahoo or Google for instance - who were started by guys like us) - but the rest of the Web.... just take a look around - we have to lock our systems up not to be inundated with pop-ups and banners, viruses, and tons of spam. I know there is still a lot of good stuff out there, but most of the time it feels like just another commercial outlet. I sometimes miss the feeling I had back when in 1997 (although I do appreciate the better browsers, bandwidth and systems of today ;-)

  81. Consuming calories by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    You don't have to consume any calories at all to get an album's worth of music. You just need to buy the meal - nobody says you have to eat it, too.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  82. Less? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Have you seen Sony's online music store? It's an incentive to order just a salad and stay the hell away from the combo.

    Speaking of that, I think all the adult happy meals all feature salads - and they are not too bad either. A little more volume than Wendys salad and fairly fresh.

    The Pedometer is wildly inaccurate I think but still an interesting freebe.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  83. My, they've come a long way... by seanmceligot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anyone here remember when a guy at Wired (I think) registered the mcdondonals.com domain for himself. He called up McDonalds and offered it to them. They said they had never heard of the internet and had no idea why they would ever want to be on it. This was back in 1994, I think.

  84. Up-size? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you want to "go large" with that operation and add a bowel reconstruction, and liposuction for only 99cents?

  85. Taking advantage of kids by lothar97 · · Score: 1
    I disagree completely. In Supersize Me, the filmmaker asks 5 or 6 year olds to identify some pictures- George Washington, Jesus, George W. Bush, and Ronald McDonald. Most kids are hesitant with all of the pictures, yet all of them immediately know who Ronald is. When asked to described what Ronald does, the kids mention he helps kids, is funny, tells kids about good food, etc.

    The kids thus form an early bond with McDonalds, and often associate it with good memories, and with a trusting character. Couple this with the fact that in many cities, the only place to find a decent playground is in the local McDonalds, and you have a marketing juggernaut pumping billions into getting kids hooked on their unhealthy food early on. Sure parents give in and take the kids there, but it's the kid insisting they want to go there in the first place.

    --

    1. Re:Taking advantage of kids by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      I disagree completely.... ...Sure parents give in and take the kids there, but it's the kid insisting they want to go there in the first place.

      How can you say you disagree completely? Your last sentance says that the parents give in and take the kids there. I said the parents are to blame. You agree with me. Of *course* it's the kids who want to go there in the first place. Kids are not expected to know better, they want what they want when they want it, and marketeers are very good at thinking up ways to make kids want things. However, it is the parents who are responsible for what the kids actually get. As you said, it is the parents who take the kids to McDonald's. Also, it's the parents who are at fault when their child knows more about Ronald McDonald than George Washington. If your child isn't receiving the education that you want them to, do something about it. Of course most people are selfish and put their needs/convenience ahead of the needs of their children, but that's another topic. Anyway, you can't disagree completely with me while agreeing with something I said. It isn't logically possible.

  86. What a deal... by polecat_redux · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, they're going to lure us into buying more bad food, with bad music? Sounds like a plan...

  87. Not a problem by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Just make sure that the meal you buy....is the ONLY meal of the day. Cause the caloric count is just about all you'd need!

    Ironically.....I'm eating a double cheeseburger from Micky D's as I type this.

  88. I'm NOT Lovin' It! by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Why. So I can hear "Ba da bah bah baaaaah" 1 million times? Rather blow my brains out, thank you all.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  89. J ROC, here's your answer by lightspawn · · Score: 1

    Does this offer also include a free gym membership?

    No.

    Just thought I'd be helpful. You're welcome.

  90. Title of this story by Bricklets · · Score: 1

    Reading through this discussion, "McDonald's and Sony Offer Music Downloads," I find it interesting how about 90% of the comments are focusing on McDonalds with little or no discussion on Sony or their music service.

    --
    Little Bricklets
    1. Re:Title of this story by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      with little or no discussion on Sony or their music service.

      Because when I think of Sony, I think of Michael Jackson, Britney Spears & a Bill Hick's comedy sketch about "corporate musician's sucking Satan's pecker"...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  91. 0 calories by koan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    pop music has been placed in the same class as a side of fries.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  92. I'll go one further... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Not only does it suck hard, but at least Apple has one thing going for them - they have the largest market share in portable music players.

    If they distribute stuff that only plays on iPod, they are still leaving themselves a large portion of the market. (for better or worse)

    What's Sony's portable music player market share? I don't know anyone with one, but I know four people with iPods, two people with Rios, and one person with a big brick of a Nomad.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  93. Wrong store... by Otto · · Score: 1

    This isn't iTunes. That would be Apple's store.

    This is Sony. They have an online music store called "Connect".

    Two entirely different people.

    Not that your point isn't valid, but you might want to RTFA next time.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Wrong store... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this is a case of RTFA. I think it's a case of "Grandparent would rather use iTunes than Sony anyways."

  94. And the answer is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over a Billion Servers!!!

  95. McDonald's is trying to change its market by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Okay, first we had the WiFi McDonald's franchises trying to poach on Starbucks' market, or set themselves up as better traveling pit stops for the highway... or something.

    Now we see the incredible overlap between: a)people who eat Big Macs; and b) people who download music from pay services.

    Seems to me like Mickey-D's is trying to reinvent itself for another market, one that's much more upscale than its middle-to-lower-middle-class roots. And yeah, I guess 'computer types' eat fast food... But are these the *same* computer people? Seems to me the people plugging their laptops in at Starbucks for the WiFi access, and downloading songs in a way that's defining that pay market, are who? Mac users. Driving Volkwagens. Um, not your McDonald's market, however much they want it to be.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  96. Secret Sauce Recipe revealed! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1
    The biggest surprise from the link to the Big Mac Nutrition info is that they reveal what is in the secret sauce:

    Soybean oil, pickles, distilled vinegar, water, egg yolks, high fructose corn syrup, sugar, onion powder, corn syrup, spice and spice extractives, salt, xanthan gum, mustard flour, propylene glycol alginate, sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate as preservatives, mustard bran, garlic powder, hydrolyzed (corn gluten, wheat, and soy) proteins, caramel color, extractives of paprika, turmeric, calcium disodium EDTA to protect flavor.

    Yikes. Just saw "Supersize Me", about the guy who ate nothing but McDonalds for a month - now we know why he got so sick! Isn't Sodium Bezoate the ingredient in "Frogert" on the Simpsons that the gypsy explains to Homer "Thats Bad"?

  97. Haiku by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

    I know the theme's been beaten to death, but I must make verse.

    Enticed by music
    Inhaled the greasy Big Mac
    Angioplasty

  98. This apathetic world... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've been buying music for 25 years now and eating in restaurants for almost as long.

    Two of my great joys in life are putting a CD on for the first time and discover that it's a fantastic piece of music and having a good meal in a restaurant I've tried for the first time. The fun in both of these activities is increased by a degree of exploration - either trawling through Internet music sites and music shop displays or driving around in an unknown area to find a good-looking place to eat.

    I'm not into fast food particularly or music downloads (music for me is about full albums, not single tracks) but I have no issue with McDonalds selling fast food or Sony/iTunes/etc. selling downloadable music, if that's what people want.

    I do have a problem with the modern general populace, however. Many people today, especially the youth generation, seem to want to live in this constant "safe zone" of life - at least here in the UK, they want the same theme pubs, fast food joints and bland popular music. In all three cases, they are assured of knowing "exactly what they are getting" beforehand without any risk of paying for something they may not think is worth the money. They rely on "product branding" to keep them from taking any risks in life and, to me, seem to live in fear of the unknown because standing out from the crowd would not be "cool".

    I don't claim to understand their motivations and when I was their age, I had many of the same traits. I therefore hope they learn, like I did, to develop the confidence in their own decision making and to not give a damn about what "everyone else" is doing and make their own decisions.

    In the meantime, just how many musicians and chefs are there out there who, because they are not a mainstream "branded product", have not had the opportunity to play us their music or cook us a meal?

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:This apathetic world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I agree with the rest of what you said but I really don't understand your point about online music stores. It's not like they prevent you from buying the whole album.

  99. man.. the super size guy must be ticked by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the SuperSize Me guy must be ticked... he coulda at least got some song downloads for all his trouble/liver damage =)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:man.. the super size guy must be ticked by Hassman · · Score: 1

      I think the SuperSize Me guy is more ticked at himself for doing that to himself... just who does he think he was educating anyway? Everyone knows fast food is terrible for you, like this opened anyone's eyes.

      In other news: Throwing human waste out into the street causes disease. Movie at 11.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  100. Weird note on the sony player by lusid1 · · Score: 1
    Found this on their download page, while looking for nonexistant information on their DRM scheme:
    Notes: Do not use SonicStage while logged on to a domain user account under Windows 2000 Professional, Windows XP Professional or Windows XP Home Edition.

    Forgetting for a minute that XP Home Edition is incapable of joining a domain, they apparently they don't like domains. This rules out every windows box I own, and since it only works on windows even if I were dumb enough to install their software it wouldn't work anyway.
  101. What do you want to do this Friday evening??? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Shall we drive down to McDonalds for a soggy Big Mac, water-down Coke and download some Christine Aguilera songs?

    Or do you want to come over to my house for a home-cooked chilli, a few beers and some classic rock music cranked up to full volume on my hi-fi?

    Enough said...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:What do you want to do this Friday evening??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell ya what. You got a deal if you upgrade your 'hi-fi' to something made in the 21st century and you got a deal.

      On second thought, I'll just use bit-torrent to downlowad some classic rock and play it on my 6.1 surround sound system ... errr ... 'hi-fi'.

    2. Re:What do you want to do this Friday evening??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or do you want to come over to my house for a home-cooked chilli, a few beers and some classic rock music cranked up to full volume on my hi-fi?

      Hmm, thats a tough decision. You have a bong available?

  102. People like to lie to themselves by Psymunn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The average north american likes mcdonalds. No one knows why. Despite the low quality of food and the fact that just sitting in a mcdonalds, you are getting second hand fat, people still eat there. Maybe it's just the way we where brough up.
    But people also like pretebding they are healthy. How many people order diet pop with their quarter pounder. Now salad is just another excuse for people to eat at McDonalds and convince themselves they are healthy. Or even better, atkins burgers (that's right, if you order the same burger, but no bread, you are healthy... umm... NO!)
    Salad at McDonalds is just part of the 'i want to get healthy but don't want to do anythign to do it' mentality that's so prevelant in north america and gives birth to dumb ideas like the atkins diet (i mean, who follows the diet of a guy who died of obesity...)

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    1. Re:People like to lie to themselves by holt · · Score: 1

      I don't order diet pop because it's healthy, I do it because it tastes better. I don't understand why people assume it's because I think I'm being healthy.

    2. Re:People like to lie to themselves by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      How many people order diet pop with their quarter pounder.

      Numbnuts:

      Would you rather they order the full-sugared pop? Maybe they really have a hankering for a Quarter Pounder, are not necessarily proud of that, understand the laws of physics and that the hundred or so calorie difference between the diet and the regular version DO matter, and are at least making ONE good choice (or one less bad choice). Why does it have to be all or nothing with guys like you? Ay carrumba.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    3. Re:People like to lie to themselves by Psymunn · · Score: 1

      I would rather they order the sugard pop
      Happy? I personally am vehmently against aspertaime. I think what is unhealthy about what a lot of people eat is not how many calories the fodo is (though this is a problem) but the processes that went into the creation of teh food.
      There is more to health and nutrition then the statistics on the side of a box. I can have a hamburger and fruit juice and still be healthy. What you say? But fruit juice has suger, and hamburgers have fat and carbohydrates. So? you are supposed to eat those things. The problem is, am i eating a quality burger or mcdonalds processsed food.
      This isn't to say i don't eat fast food (i'm more of a BK man myself) but, given the option between aspertaime and suger, i choose suger (lord knows there's enough suger and salt in the bread to negate it anyway). Diet pop isn't healthy. And if having a diet pop makes you more inclinde to eat the burger, then, infact, all or nothing is better then more of half. Anyway, insulin levels are dropping, so i'm giogn to stop ranting and go eat some junk food.

      --
      The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    4. Re:People like to lie to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Salad at McDonalds is just part of the 'i want to get healthy but don't want to do anythign to do it' mentality that's so prevelant in north america and gives birth to dumb ideas like the atkins diet (i mean, who follows the diet of a guy who died of obesity...)
      >>

      Atkins died of a brain injury, suffered when he slipped on the ice.

      Maybe we should take up jogging, like Jim Fixx (who died of a heart attack... while jogging!!!)

    5. Re:People like to lie to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neato!

    6. Re:People like to lie to themselves by rk87 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's almost as many people ordering diet cokes as regular cokes. I know, because I work there. Usually, the guys get the regular cokes, the females get the diet cokes.

      However, nobody seems to get that fake sugar is worse than real sugar (doesn't make you as fat, but as abovementioned, has other bad things).

      And then what I see all the time is the kid wanting coke, and the parent saying "diet coke". My job prevents me from saying anything about this, but it makes me angry. first of all, young kids need to be a bit fat (studies have shown this, can't find my source). secondly, they are unknowingly feeding their kids poision. I know the FDA doesn't agree just yet, but I'm sure that they're on their way.

      --
      I'M NOT ANGRY!
  103. Automobile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does your wife drive a car? Every little bump you hit will count as a step taken, even though you aren't walking at all.

    I have one of these things and they really aren't accurate at all. I tested it by wearing it in different spots on my body (insert funnyness here), and walking 50 paces. On my waist it measured between 20 and 80, depending on the angle which it was clipped on. Clipped it on my sock and it registered over 100. Hung it round my neck as a necklace and it was closest ... about 40-60 paces.

    End result: pedometer isn't particularily useful except if we wear it exactly the same spot and angle every time, and then only use it to compare the amount of excercise relative to the previous days.

  104. As bad as cigarettes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    30% of cancers in the U.S. are attributable to cigarette smoking while 25% of cancers in the U.S. are attributable to diet. I'd rather be a smoker than obese...even with the added risk.

  105. problem... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    whatever the threshhold for the McD's pedometer is either very high or inconsistent - I don't study my girlfriend's steps but I don't think they are that nonconstant. It only reads about one in three, and while it doesn't read steps, it will read jumps, which is consistent with your point. Whatever method it uses doesn't work on a practical level - it doesn't count the normal steps someone makes and so is not useful for counting exercise.

    1. Re:problem... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a problem for some people (including me) with even more expensive pedometers. A couple of months ago, I bought a $20 one and watched it either way overcount (3:1) or way undercount (5 minute walk that resulted in 100 steps registering). I'm reluctant to shell out for an expensive one given this track record.

  106. Papa John's has 4 free Musicmatch downloads by glave · · Score: 1

    Buy 4 20 oz drinks and get four musicmatch downloads free. Just costs $3.99.

    Not bad.

  107. good lord! by frankmanowar · · Score: 1
    that's about 7200 calories you will need to consume in order to get an album's worth of music

    You would eat them? egads, man!

    --

    "Other bands play, but Manowar KILLS"
  108. Democrats have some flaws... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    I wasn't so much counting tax "cuts" (although that's a valid point) but the fallacy that decreasing taxes and increasing spending are mutually compatible. Three administrations of Republicans have favored this, and three administration of Republicans have run massive deficits. Only Bush Sr. had the courage to raise taxes to cover what he wanted to spend. Ultimately, (-1) + (-1) != 2, which is what has been claimed by Republicans.

    While the Democrats have done their share of "optimistic" math (optimistic economic assumptions and undercounting program costs and tax increases), the Republicans have based their ideals on smaller (federal) government and fiscal responsibility, two things at which the last three administrations of Republicans have failed miserably. Either their math is wrong (hence the comment) or they are being untrue to their (proclaimed) ideals.

    You can probably tell my bias from this...

    1. Re:Democrats have some flaws... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      or they are being untrue to their (proclaimed) ideals.

      It's not the math. They absolutely ARE being untrue to their stated ideals. However it is not unique to Republicrats. I can tell your bias, and I'm not saying you're wrong, because it's a bias...I'm just biased against Demopublicans just as much. They're all the same, with the repubs increasing taxes (which is against their stated ideals) and the dems approving gov't help for people who don't need it (no means testing for welfare benefits for old people) which is against their stated ideals. No one really has the country's best interests at heart; it is impossible to make it to the national stage if you do. The 'party' system is inherently flawed and favors a certain type of candidate, which is not compatible with the 'best' type of person to run the country (one who cares only and totally about the people and what is in their best interest rather than what is in party/self-interest)

      I wasn't bashing on you (i hope it didn't seem that way) but on America's political system in general.

    2. Re:Democrats have some flaws... by Nafai7 · · Score: 1

      Since we are totally off topic anyway, which is better? this or this?

    3. Re:Democrats have some flaws... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Since we are totally off topic anyway, which is better? this or this?

      Well, I'm pretty much against the party system entirely, but if forced to choose I'll go with the Libertarian Party. It's kind of weird, the concept of Libertarians joined into a political party, but their platform is closest to my personal beliefs. I just wish they'd stop voting Republican. Of *course* no Libertarian is ever going to get elected if the people in his own damn party aren't voting for him.

  109. Re:What happened - health food at McD's? by ahertz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're not dumbing it down - it's not a full fledged pedometer. A real pedometer allows you to calibrate it, and will estimate the distance that you've walked, calories that you've burned, and other useful information. The 'stepometer' they're giving out only counts steps, and doesn't give you any other information.

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized. -AC
  110. you're also forgetting the longer term weight loss by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    ...when the vomiting from the diet of bad pop and Big Macs ruptures your esophagus, causing either death or a long-term parenteral diet. In either case, the BAAM effect should yield weight loss in McDonald's target audience, both individually and as a whole.

  111. Here's a thought... by RyoShin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's an idea: Go to McCorporate, purchase a couple dozen (or hundered, depending on your choice/desire of music) of the meals, but not for yourself. Have the meals donated to some hunger program, keep the free songs for yourself. You get the music, and you can write off the purchase of the McMeals as a tax exemption or whatever.

    While many people may not enjoy the thought of eating at McDonald's, I'm sure that quite a few homeless/poor people would be overjoyed at the thought of a full meal for free, regardless of the grease (homeless people don't care about carbs.) You get the music, they get the food, everyone's happy. Oh, and you get a tax exemption.

    Just something that came to my mind, I wouldn't actually do this. [no money]

    /eats a Double Cheese a day, has stayed at a constant weight (don't know if I can say the same about cholesterol)

  112. The player is even worse by hweimer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Notes:
    Do not use SonicStage while logged on to a domain user account under Windows 2000
    Professional, Windows XP Professional or Windows XP Home Edition.

    SonicStage should be installed while logged on to an account with administrator privileges.


    It's not easy to show that much technical incompetence in such few words.

    --
    OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  113. 400 calorie coke by Dog135 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just checked a bottle of coke in the office fridge. It's 300 calories for 24oz. That's 12.5 calories per oz.

    Now, a large Coke from McDonalds is 32oz, making it 400 calories even.

    Big Mac meal, supersized is:

    Big Mac: 600
    Large Coke: 310 (from McDonald's site, because of ice?)
    Large Fry: 520

    Total: 1410 calories.

    Someone mentioned a cup of lard is 1850 calories. Only 140 calories more then a supersized #1. Add a 12oz orange juice and it's even.

    Stats (not for the faint of heart)

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
    1. Re:400 calorie coke by Dog135 · · Score: 1

      Oops, I just noticed an error in my math. 1850-1410 is not 140. Sorry!

      --
      "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
    2. Re:400 calorie coke by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, lard..

    3. Re:400 calorie coke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Coke you get from a fountain is hardly the same deal as from a can. And half the cup is ice anyways.

      Speaking of which... anyone else noticed Wendy's really eased off the ice in their drinks? Used to be well over 1/2 is, so when you finish your drink it's all watered down gross shit. Now when you get to the end, there's almost no ice left.

  114. gullible, naive, ignorant... by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    Don't feel pity for them, honey. Anyone not living under a rock knows by now that fast food is really bad for you. And anyone who would collect fat points on a punch card just to download fscking Britney deserves clogged arteries.

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  115. You're gonna need it! by midifarm · · Score: 1
    With the consumption of the value meal being at over 1200 calories with fries and a coke, you're looking at over 4 extra pounds of fat on your body per album! Just think if you "Super Size" it!!!

    Peace

  116. Re:Would you like an angioplasty with that downloa by Hassman · · Score: 1

    I'm sick of this crap. Companies offer these sort of incentives all the time to sell their products...

    If you don't like the deal, don't buy into it. No one bashes Burger King when the newest Disney movie hits the theater an they have specialized toys for kids. No one slams Wendy's when they team up with the NBA or NCAA and offer collectably cups with their meals.

    Instead of whining about how this is going to make people fat and have a heart attack, why don't you think about this for a second. Do you really think people are going to run out and buy 12 big mac means to get a CD? No!

    At the end of the day all this does is encorage someone who is already going to eat lunch out that day to go to McDonalds instead of a different fast food joint.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  117. Taking things even more OT... but who by Mitleid · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean to declare that the Atkins doesn't work. In fact, after reading a couple Atkins-based books and going abroad to eastern Europe last summer, my girlfriend lost almost 30 pounds in a span of two and a half months. I mention her going abroad because she was able to get her hands on some "real" and untainted (preservative-free, no added fat, etc) food. Hehehe...

    I guess I was a little unclear when I used the term "jazz". The jazz I was referring to wasn't the actual diet, but more so the commodification of it seen so recently here in America. There is a lot more to low carb diets like the Atkins than just buying a wrap from a fucking Subway sandwich shop. My point was that it seems that most Americans don't really care or pay attention to the details or logistics of these types of diets; they expect to just be able to *BUY* Atkins products and watch the pounds melt away. These are the same clowns who will by a triple Big Mac and a extra large fry at a McDonald's and then justify it by washing it all down with a diet Coke.

    --

    --
    Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    1. Re:Taking things even more OT... but who by dustman · · Score: 1

      There is a lot more to low carb diets like the Atkins than just buying a wrap from a fucking Subway sandwich shop.

      I agree with you 100%. People really need to read about the diet and the theory behind it, before just buying Atkins-labelled products.

      And most chains' ideas of "low carb" are just stupid. Listen up Subway: I could make up a low carb diet too, just don't eat anything! Cuts your carb intake to 0! They advertise that their low carb wraps "have less than 10g of carbohydrate" (or whatever), but that seems to be because there is like 12g of food there.

  118. Re:Would you like an angioplasty with that downloa by Hassman · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I didn't mean for this to be an attack on the parent, but the whole message board here.

    This really should have been an independent post...I just got fed up with reading the comments and this happened to be the post I was on.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  119. McDonald's recommends these artists! by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    For your "misery loves company" mix:

    Notorious B.I.G.

    Mama Cass Elliot

    Chubby Checker

    Tiny Tim

  120. Re:/duh, as Nerdy as the health magazines for blon by Spolster · · Score: 1

    they just forgot the upper case C.
    1 Calorie = 1000 calories = 1 kcalorie

  121. Re:Would you like an angioplasty with that downloa by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

    Work for McDonalds? At no place did I say people weren't responsible for their own health. I made a joke about requiring an agioplasty if you download a lot of music as a result of this promotion. Get a grip on yourself.

  122. I am here to tell you: NO. by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    I always thought thousand island normally had pickles in it.

    You, sir, are the victim of a cruel deception. And in case the people who've got to you are the ones I suspect, let me advise you: there aren't "bubbly chunks" in soda, either. Normally.

  123. Right on. by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    On those days when only fast food is available, I always order the kid's meal. Smaller portions=less fat. And sometimes I get a toy I even LIKE! What's sad is, while the kid's meal is a perfect size for an adult, there's no lesser size to serve a child. The kid's meal at taco bell is two regular tacos and a side of nachos and cheese. I watched a friend's 4 year old granddaughter try to eat it all and she gave up. I'm glad her Nana wasn't a member of the Clean Plate Club.

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    1. Re:Right on. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      I would say the growth in child obesity has come from adults who don't know how to cook (they just buy a box and the cheapest, fattiest ground beef they can get their hands on) who also make their kids eat everything.

      Kids know when they're not hungry anymore. Don't make them eat if they don't want to, but also don't let them snack.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  124. Re:What happened - health food at McD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The 'stepometer' they're giving out only counts steps,
    > and doesn't give you any other information.

    That's the exact definition of a pedometer. Something that counts steps.
    Any other information (distance, "burnt calories") that can be calculated once you've got the data that a pedometer measures (number of steps) is irrelevant to the state of being a pedometer.

    A car is a car, regardless of whether it's also got a DVD player in the back seat.

  125. that's fine.. by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    I didn't take it as bashing - I just wanted to explain what I was complaining about.

  126. Re:Think of the kids! by Technician · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer, I didn't download the free stoftware to find out the billing end, but I couldn't find this answer on the website (yes I did read the article and checked the connect site)

    Not to mention that ATRAC3 has some of the worst DRM and restrictive software I've ever seen.. You have to check music into and out of your portable player device, I believe. It's just wacky as hell.

    Nobody mentioned if an account including a CC number has to be set up to play the free music. I could not find anything about this online. I have a 10 year old and a 12 year old. They don't have CC's They are minors so private information is not to be supplied. They can go to a music store and buy CD's with cash. Is the Mc'Dees offer set up so kids can't get free tunes simply because they don't have a credit card and are not permitted to provide personal information? Is there a provision so the kids can set up a minor's account, not provide protected information (privacy of minors), not provide a credit card number and still receive free tunes (and play them)?

    The grade school ages are the biggest purchaser of retail music. Why would a free promotion exclude them simply by requiring financial and personal information that should be not given online?

    My hope is if they addressed this issue, they would not offer M rated material to minors for free. It just doesn't seem right for kids to get free emminen tracks from McDees.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  127. that concurs with their estimates.... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    the "stepometer" gives the same figure - about 2.6 ft/step. My girlfriend walked about 1/2-3/4 mile (about 1000-1500 steps) and it only read 800. Walking through the parking lot, which should have been more like 90 ft, only read 10 steps.

    So, the step count the stepometer gives is inaccurate (I wasn't expecting a distance) it was giving 1/3 the number of steps she walked rather than 1/3 the feet (which would make sense).

  128. kind of a ong way to go by geekoid · · Score: 1

    to take a jab at McDonalds, don't you think? It's not like you have to eat the 7200 calories in one sitting.
    If you have a cuople of kids and spouse, that could be 4 right there.

    Everybody seems to bag on McDonalds, but whats wrong with 8 oz of meat, three pieces of bread and some lettuce? you to ne more precise:
    Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions, on a sesami seed bun.

    It's bassically a salad, with 8 oz of meat.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  129. it all makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soif you listen to those junk music sony offers, you must be some one who consumes a lot junk food from mcdonalds

  130. Slight Correction by PatientZero · · Score: 1
    The promotion with McD's is not a contest. You buy a Big Mac Meal; you get a song. Sure, you shorten your life at the same time, but ... it's a free song!

    Regarding the SonicStage player, my mother always told me to say nothing if I had nothing nice to say. So, "nothing." ;)

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    1. Re:Slight Correction by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I'll bet Sony's giving away the song for free in an effort to jumpstart their apparently failing format, and that's why Apple didn't succeed in their bid. That's a pretty hefty investment in royalties, but I doubt there's a lot of room in the margin of a Big Mac meal.

      If you have to download a program you wouldn't normally load for a low-value prize, a lot of people aren't going to be interested. Perhaps this is also why the iTunes promotion wasn't successful, and their program has a flawless reputation with rave reviews.

      D

  131. Oh Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost unpalatable organic matter disguised as food, along with banal sounds disguised as music... what a great American combo.

    I can't wait!

    Thank you O' corporate masters...

  132. The world is not that black and white.... by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Umm, so you're saying McDonald's food IS healthy?

    No, I'm not. Obviously you can only grasp binary concepts, however the real world is not black and white.

    Food is just food. There's nothing inherently healthy or unhealthy about any particular food. It's silly to state that this or that food is unhealthy because that's oversimplifing the situation.

    The reality of the matter is that what's healthy or unhealthy, at any given moment, depends on the individual and their current dietary needs. Charactizing any particular food as healthy or unhealthy is meaningless without considering the current, changing from moment to moment, needs of the individual consuming the food in question.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:The world is not that black and white.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but food that's full of:

      saturated fats
      trans fats
      refined white sugar
      refined white salt

      is unhealthy. Particularly when it's got all of those in combination, plus a cocktail of other harsh stuff. In fact, I don't really consider it food at all, particularly after having worked there as a teen.

      You have to eat a certain number of calories worth of carbohydrate, fat, and protein each day (in the first world it'd be more accurate to say you're restricted to that number). Along with that, you need both a minimum amount and a maximum amount of micronutrients. Sometimes the level is zero (like free trans fats), but more often it's just lower than can be achieved by eating highly processed "food". Thus, that food (or excuse for it) is net unhealthy, and there's no way around that.

      There's no way to meet your dietary needs by eating at McDonald's without either eating an excess of stuff that's net bad for you, or throwing away most of what you paid for (and the prices are already expensive). The same applies to all highly processed food. This stuff is made the way it is for a whole host of reasons that seem very good when you're trying to run an empire of cookie-cutter store franchises, but none of them have anything to do with maintaining or improving your health or anyone else's. That's leaving aside the wider effects of industrial farming on the world, and thus the long-term health of the people in it.

      I'd rather drink biodiesel than eat at McDonald's, and it'd probably be better for me. Even if it was made from their own waste oil. ;)

    2. Re:The world is not that black and white.... by Otto · · Score: 1

      There's no way to meet your dietary needs

      Stop. You have absolutely *NO* idea what my, or anybody else's, dietary needs actually are. Any argument otherwise is nonsense. You can generalize to a generic standard human being all you like, but I am not a generic standard human being and neither are you. Our dietary needs are different from each other, from those around us, from most everybody else that there is on the planet.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  133. Health is not so simply stated... by Otto · · Score: 1

    You meant to say this!?! You seriously believe that eating even one big mac, yes even just one big mac, is HEALTHY!?! Where are you getting this health innformation? Please tell us, becuase I like to try and eat helthy and I would love to get a big mac if it's good for me. Or did you mean that it is not UNhealthy? Which is different somehow..?

    What's healthy and unhealthy is not that easy to quantify. It depends on what your body needs right then and there, at the time of consumption. If you happen to need some extra carbs and fat in your body at the moment, your body will use them. If not, then your body will either reject them or incorporate them into your system for future needs (aka, store them as fat somewhere).

    Nobody ever said life was simple. Treating it simplistically by thinking this/that is healthy/unhealthy is foolish.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  134. Sorry, but no... by Otto · · Score: 1

    The thing is that many things in life are "bad for you". Alcohol is bad for you. Smoking is bad for you. The question that we should be asking is NOT whether or not something is bad for you BUT RATHER how bad is it?

    Many doctors say that a glass of wine or two every day is, in fact, good for you.

    No rule in health is fixed, because health is an individual thing. It varies depending on the person, the time, the moment to moment needs of the body.

    Food, alcohol, smoking, these are simply things we ingest (inhale). They are neither good nor bad. They simply are. What makes them good or bad is you and your body's current needs.

    Now, I grant you that there's likely never a time your body needs to inhale tobacco smoke, but nevertheless the smoke is not bad in and of itself. It's your body's reaction to that smoke and what happens inside *you* that makes eating/inhaling a thing good or bad.

    Good or bad can only be defined in terms of people, and people are vastly different in their moment to moment needs. Too vastly different to be able to say that any particular food is good/bad. That's all I'm saying here.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  135. Umm.. read your own damn link... by Otto · · Score: 1

    Go look at McDonald's Nutritional facts:
    http://www.mcdonalds.com/app_controller.nu trition. categories.nutrition.index.html
    Most of their salads have the same level of saturated fats as their sandwiches. There is no such thing as a healthy meal at McDonalds.


    Umm.. what? The Fiesta Salad has 11g of saturated fats (13g with the Sour Cream), I grant you, but the rest of them are all 6g or under. By comparison, the Big Mac has 11g and the fries has anywhere from 2g-4.5g. So you're comparing less than 6 grams as roughly the same as 13-15.5g? Not to rain on your parade, but that's less than half the amount.

    And a fiesta salad is basically a big ass taco salad: "Premium mixed greens topped with seasoned beef, cheddar-jack cheese, and thin, crispy tortilla strips and sour cream." If anyone thought that has less fat than a burger, they're an idiot anyway.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  136. Great! by Saturninus · · Score: 0

    I can have a McHeart Attack while listening to my McMusic!

  137. Re:It makes a big point slashdoters will miss! by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    THE BIG POINT is when his girlfriend is talking about how bad their sex life is as a result.
    My friend was TOTALLY sold after that interview.

    The whole movie is not really about him eating for 1 month like that.

    Its an extreme 1 month example--some people really do eat badly. But its like a plot device for the rest of the movie.

  138. an idea. by martin100 · · Score: 1

    maybe you could just only eat half the burger. then that would be less calories. you are aware you dont have to eat every item you own?

  139. I know.. I did see the movie... by Otto · · Score: 1

    That's why I said it was funny. All that filler material around the main point of the thing is quite entertaining. Doesn't prove anything or say anything of substance, but it's funny nonetheless.

    It's filler material. What you call the "plot device" is the only actual claim of substance in the movie, and it's a stupid claim at that.

    If anything else in the movie opened your eyes to the truth or something like that, then you're an idiot. I mean, seriously, it was just humor. Filler. That's all. It didn't have any real value of any kind. Certainly nothing that should convince anybody of anything. At nobody rational.

    IMO, the biggest reason not to eat McD's is the taste. But that's me. I base my eating choices on things other than what some filmmaker moron's girlfriend thinks.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  140. http://www.supersizeme.com/ by br0d · · Score: 1

    Go see it.

  141. Re:What happened - health food at McD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh, give him some slack, he's an American.

  142. Pied Piper of McDonaldland by Dark+Bard · · Score: 1

    The new ad will be Ronald McDonald playing a pipe while being followed by a couple of dozen fat kids singing the latest Brittany Spears song. Hey it worked in the fable.

  143. Decent promotions, where are they? by cfuse · · Score: 1

    When 'chew and spew' (that's Australian slang for you) decides to put a bullet in record exec for every mac sold, that's when I'll be buying up big.

  144. Re:What happened - health food at McD's? by presto8 · · Score: 1

    I think they did this for marketing reasons: By calling it a Stepometer, they are able to trademark the name and start building up a brand around it.

    Interestingly, the Stepometer trademark is owned by Coca-Cola (if you read the fine print on the little booklet that comes with it). It makes you wonder if Coke is manufacturing these for McDonald's and, if so, what deal they made for the whole situation.

    One guess: The adult happy meal has a Coca-cola bottled water product in it. Maybe McDonald's agreed to push the Dasani water in exchange for Coke providing the Stepometers...