It would at least make sense if that were the case. But, it isn't. They have demanded he remove portions of social fixer that have nothing to do with ads or the blocking of them.
In my opinion, when your site serves up HTML, as long as my browser does not subvert your webserver to gain unauthorized access, or use your APIs in a way that you did not intend it to, then what I do with that HTML you have served up is entirely my business.
Except that "under the age of 25" basically means the world hasn't kicked them in the balls yet, and biking around their urban area seems a pleasant way to pass the INFINITE amount of time they have left.
This is sensible; but the reason I don't buy on iTunes or physical media is because I really don't care if it becomes unavailable. I've watched it, no point to me in watching again.
My only exception at all to this rule is Office Space.:)
I have read before that legislators often don't even write the laws; they are written by lobbyists who persuade legislators to sign off on it. I don't know the veracity of that claim, but more often than not, it seems feasible.
I clicked on that examiner link. I was greeted with 2 (that's T-W-O) banner ads at the top of the screen for a stupid Steve Buscemi show that I never got past the first episode of. These banners then expanded *themselves* to fill the entire screen, twice. I contracted them. I began reading the article. About one paragraph in, a video advertisement swooped in from the bottom and began playing itself. It had a little "X" at the top, so I clicked that X. As soon as I clicked the X, a popup advertisement appeared in the center of my screen. I then closed down that website entirely. It's almost like they didn't want me reading what they had typed at all.
I'm sorry, a voice of reason and inclusive live-and-let-live compromising of beliefs will not at all be welcome in the "burn all the Christians and be sure to bring marshmallows" group that this news post will scare up.
Linus gets love and only love on this website. Very strange. All these people saying "professionalism" doesn't matter must not work around other people. Every person doing a job anywhere you interact with, you expect professionalism. Or would you like your waiter to cuss you out over your choice of dinner?
I have never been to nor heard of such a community.
The article seem to imply that this is a felony, as in this case I would think murder is the proper charge.
"Anyone with information about the hit-and-run should call Crime Stoppers at 919-683-1200. Crime Stoppers pays cash rewards for information leading to arrests in felony cases and callers never have to identify themselves."
That doesn't "substantiate her claims." That substantiates that one person was injured, and so was another. Could have been a fistfight, could have been anything. Still her word versus his as to the cause of the fight, unless there is visual/audio evidence or other witnesses.
Google glass takes pictures and videos. So what? So does my phone. I could walk down the street holding up my phone recording everybody and everything.
Streetview was a google system being operated by a google employee (or contractor.) Google glass is just some guy wearing some glasses.
My point is, why is everyone all pissy that "google is invading privacy" when it's actually the person wearing the glasses?
I wish they'd release the code for Jedi Knight (the first one) if only for nostalgia.
I spent many of my 12-year-old nights making levels for that game in JED.
I looked up this Anno 2070 game. It looked very pretty and an interesting concept. The trailer was enticing. It's also available for as little as $18.29. You wouldn't pay $18 for a legal copy of a game you obviously enjoy?
I've been in computers professionally for 12 years now and have never once, ever, ever heard the three letters EMC put together in reference to a company.
I do as well. How's that for improving your image? To be fair, though, I had to click on Images. The first website result was obviously her reputation site.
Slashdot Mirror
This "first-world problems" thing being used to dismiss issues is getting out of hand.
It would at least make sense if that were the case. But, it isn't. They have demanded he remove portions of social fixer that have nothing to do with ads or the blocking of them. In my opinion, when your site serves up HTML, as long as my browser does not subvert your webserver to gain unauthorized access, or use your APIs in a way that you did not intend it to, then what I do with that HTML you have served up is entirely my business.
Hah! Ahahaha! LOL.
Except that "under the age of 25" basically means the world hasn't kicked them in the balls yet, and biking around their urban area seems a pleasant way to pass the INFINITE amount of time they have left.
This is sensible; but the reason I don't buy on iTunes or physical media is because I really don't care if it becomes unavailable. I've watched it, no point to me in watching again. My only exception at all to this rule is Office Space. :)
I have read before that legislators often don't even write the laws; they are written by lobbyists who persuade legislators to sign off on it. I don't know the veracity of that claim, but more often than not, it seems feasible.
I clicked on that examiner link. I was greeted with 2 (that's T-W-O) banner ads at the top of the screen for a stupid Steve Buscemi show that I never got past the first episode of. These banners then expanded *themselves* to fill the entire screen, twice. I contracted them. I began reading the article. About one paragraph in, a video advertisement swooped in from the bottom and began playing itself. It had a little "X" at the top, so I clicked that X. As soon as I clicked the X, a popup advertisement appeared in the center of my screen. I then closed down that website entirely. It's almost like they didn't want me reading what they had typed at all.
Doesn't matter; your downloading the page likely caused multiple ad impressions to register, supporting the author and publisher.
Even the article that's linked immediately behind "19-year-old" has 7/23/92 as his birthdate. That's 21 years in my book.
I'm sorry, a voice of reason and inclusive live-and-let-live compromising of beliefs will not at all be welcome in the "burn all the Christians and be sure to bring marshmallows" group that this news post will scare up.
Ain't nobody got time for that. I say bring on the pills.
Have you not heard? Everything is now a crime.
Linus gets love and only love on this website. Very strange. All these people saying "professionalism" doesn't matter must not work around other people. Every person doing a job anywhere you interact with, you expect professionalism. Or would you like your waiter to cuss you out over your choice of dinner?
...that's exactly what is going to happen ? Hello, and welcome to the internet.
I have never been to nor heard of such a community. The article seem to imply that this is a felony, as in this case I would think murder is the proper charge. "Anyone with information about the hit-and-run should call Crime Stoppers at 919-683-1200. Crime Stoppers pays cash rewards for information leading to arrests in felony cases and callers never have to identify themselves."
That doesn't "substantiate her claims." That substantiates that one person was injured, and so was another. Could have been a fistfight, could have been anything. Still her word versus his as to the cause of the fight, unless there is visual/audio evidence or other witnesses.
Google glass takes pictures and videos. So what? So does my phone. I could walk down the street holding up my phone recording everybody and everything. Streetview was a google system being operated by a google employee (or contractor.) Google glass is just some guy wearing some glasses. My point is, why is everyone all pissy that "google is invading privacy" when it's actually the person wearing the glasses?
True, I forgot that JK was itself a sequel.
I wish they'd release the code for Jedi Knight (the first one) if only for nostalgia. I spent many of my 12-year-old nights making levels for that game in JED.
I looked up this Anno 2070 game. It looked very pretty and an interesting concept. The trailer was enticing. It's also available for as little as $18.29. You wouldn't pay $18 for a legal copy of a game you obviously enjoy?
I've been in computers professionally for 12 years now and have never once, ever, ever heard the three letters EMC put together in reference to a company.
I see that the game of identifying logical fallacies instead of actual debate is still being played these days.
Nashville welcomes you with open arms.
You've obviously never seen "A Few Good Men" and and can't identify the quotation, or the outcome to the person who said it. Get over yourself.
I do as well. How's that for improving your image? To be fair, though, I had to click on Images. The first website result was obviously her reputation site.