Slashdot Mirror


New Google Homepage Features

SecularG writes "It seems that Google has added new features to it's Personalized Home. To edit the content of your personalized homepage you click 'Add Content' in the top right, and a list of options slide out from the left. You can add your own bookmarks, select from more news feeds, and add your own RSS news feeds." Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

274 comments

  1. Obviously... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

    It takes less bandwidth to see a dupe headline with RSS than it does when one reloads the entire slashdot mainpage. [rimshot]

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Obviously... by ucahg · · Score: 1

      I think he meant that Slashdot has always been available from Day 1 of Google's personalized home page as a news source. At least, it distracts me from work quite regularly.

    2. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes its

    3. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you see "it's" or "its" in the GP?

    4. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also some of us like new sites where the editors can speel, or where they at least read what theyre posting before they do it....

    5. Re:Obviously... by th3space · · Score: 1

      It's also lagging quite a bit behind the RSS feed, I suspect...the 'top story' on the Google Portal Page is a little old.

      note: the current story is this one right here.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    6. Re:Obviously... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      It is harder than replying to the proper message, which you haven't mastered yet...

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes less bandwidth to see a dupe headline with RSS than it does when one reloads the entire slashdot mainpage. [rimshot]

      But does /. ban google for hitting its RSS too often? [rolleyes]

      I've gotten banned before whilst dinking around trying to see how RSS is set up. Now I don't bother with RSS. I'll wait the 5 seconds it takes for /.'s servers to configure the page.

    8. Re:Obviously... by Electrum · · Score: 2, Informative

      But does /. ban google for hitting its RSS too often?

      Yes. I have seen that happen at least once.

    9. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

      Securityfocus, blogsites, infinite matter of the universe. I think being able to have your own home page with rss feeds is great!

    10. Re:Obviously... by wolf- · · Score: 1


      Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

      It takes less bandwidth to see a dupe headline with RSS than it does when one reloads the entire slashdot mainpage. [rimshot]


      Because Slashdot has become a mirror for other sites, only 24-48 hours late?

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    11. Re:Obviously... by mhearne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use Linux, and supposedly I can make rss work, but I haven't been able to so far, and I don't really care that much.

      There is something I think you may have missed - You can search for your own entry (or enter a url) if it isn't in Google's stock list.

      Just click on "Create a Section" at the bottom of the sidebar, and you will get a search box.

      I have already used it to add "This Day in History".

      Michael

    12. Re:Obviously... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Welcome to Spyware you embrace! It's so cool, you rush into surveillance!

      GOOGLE spelled backwards is Echelon

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    13. Re:Obviously... by ttldkns · · Score: 1
      GOOGLE spelled backwards is Echelon
      funny, i thought it was elgoog
      --
      How many computers are too many?
    14. Re:Obviously... by eihab · · Score: 1
      why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?
      The ability to include other feeds from Slashdot!
      I have the BSD section under the main section now.
      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    15. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I always thought you had to be a paid subscriber in order to get your submissions posted! Given this, it would severely limit the amount of fresh (non-dupe) postings that were available if you were limited to what Slashdot accepts.

  2. Countdown until Google.com looks like by 55555+Manbabies! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    yahoo.com. What a pointless and crowded web portal.

    RSS eliminates the need for web portals entirely. You can just use the RSS functionality of Safari for a home page, or make a local page with the RSS feeds you want to see.

    1. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by vinlud · · Score: 5, Informative

      The difference is this isn't google.com, but google.com/ig, a portal you choose to visit. If you're just googling you wont notice.

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    2. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by anaesthetica · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I agree with your distaste for web portals. Still, portals remain quite popular, and I think Google is trying to tap into that area. Yahoo! still remains quite popular because it has portal features.

      On the other hand, I don't think that Google as a whole will turn into Yahoo!. The main Google page will likely always stay simple, whereas the personalized homepage is just for people who want portal stuff. The one advantage that a Google RSS/portal has is the same that Gmail has: everywhere you go, regardless of what computer you're on, it's the same interface and setup. You don't need to configure an RSS reader on each computer you use: just go to Google.com/ig. Same with Gmail.

      Also, the dhtml sliding options pane on the left is nifty, but I can't help but think that it's going overboard a little bit.

    3. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by learn+fast · · Score: 5, Informative

      yahoo.com. What a pointless and crowded web portal.

      use search.yahoo.com for a bare bones interface

    4. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip. If I ever have a reason to use Yahoo, that's where I will go.

    5. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Ieshan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Okay. I understand the hatred for portal pages, but the truth is, lots and lots of people like them. Why? Because they can't just "make a local page with RSS feeds".

      That would be like taking your car into the mechanic with a transmission problem and having him scoff at you, "Pffft. Go build yourself a new one. Moron."

      The large majority of net users don't know what RSS means. They don't know HTML. Web Portals let people click on things and have a familiar feel to them. People only need to know one little address to get to a place where they can find "everything" on the web.

    6. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Like when Anakian said Noooooo!!!

      Welcome to the Portal
      We got fun 'n' games
      We got everything you want
      Honey we know the names
      We are the people that can find
      Whatever you may need
      If you got the money honey
      We got your disease

      Welcome to the Portal
      It gets worse here everyday
      Ya learn ta live like an animal
      In the Portal where we play
      If you got a hunger for what you see
      You'll take it eventually
      You can have anything you want
      But you better not take it from me

    7. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by rbarreira · · Score: 4, Informative
      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    8. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by HyperChicken · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And if you wanted to use Yahoo as a pure search engine, just go to http://search.yahoo.com/. They don't force you into the portal page.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    9. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by adamjaskie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least Google is mosty simple text. Yahoo is covered in flashy pictures and stuff. Though, it used to be a lot worse...

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    10. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by op12 · · Score: 1

      That's true...though I've been slightly annoyed at the little line in the top right of the main page. When you're signed into gmail it gives you an account options and sign out link.

    11. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by revery · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you made the parent post's point for him...

    12. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by iabervon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As long as they don't put junk in the results pages, it doesn't matter too much. People with modern browsers tend to put searches into the browser's box, not go to a google page, and people with obsolete browsers generally need a portal to get RSS and such.

    13. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Silly person. I, like many others, am not always working at the same machine and can't just use a client.

      I want a web page version of Thunderbird, myself. This is heading toward it, with gmail and rss on there. If I could only delete the stuff I have read from the rss lists, I would delete Thunderbird and use this portal everywhere.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    14. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Zentac · · Score: 1

      that was quite a shock, I havn't seen that page for quite a while... I totaly forgot what the origional Google page looked like. Using the firefox default for a while now... http://www.google.com/firefox/

    15. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RSS eliminates the need for web portals entirely. You can just use the RSS functionality of Safari for a home page, or make a local page with the RSS feeds you want to see.


      Right, how silly of me. It's soooooo easy, too. When I'm at a friend's house, and want to catch up on some feed reading, all I have to do is fire up their Safari...er, wait...they're on Windows. Ok, ok, fire up whatever browser they have, download and install an RSS reader, then try to remember all the feeds I've collected and add them in! Simple.

      When I'm at an internet cafe, it's the same thing. Simple!

      Oh, and when I find a new feed and want to add it to my feeds page, all I have to do is remember to add the feed to both my home computers, my work computer, and my laptop. Easy! No need for a portal here.

      With My Yahoo! or Google Homepage, I have access to my feeds, news, weather, mail, stock quotes, etc. at ANY COMPUTER that can access the internet. Anywhere, anytime. It's the same page (or set of pages), no matter where I'm at. But, you're right. RSS (of which I have about 30 feeds on My Yahoo!, separated into pages based on categories: news, tech, gossip, etc.) eliminates the need for web portals entirely. Wait...not it doesn't. RSS is PART OF my web portal, and travels with me wherever I go.
    16. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Also, the dhtml sliding options pane on the left is nifty, but I can't help but think that it's going overboard a little bit.
      Google wants to be the Apple of the web. (If you've used OS X, there's lots of pointless visual effects, but they look cool.)
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    17. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by ThirdOfThree · · Score: 1

      Also, the dhtml sliding options pane on the left is nifty, but I can't help but think that it's going overboard a little bit.

      For some reason, I couldn't get the new http://google.com/ig to work in Firefox. I'm using 1.0.6, and it didn't work on both OS X 10.4.2 and Win XP Pro.

      I could open the sidebar and the drop down menus, but whenever I clicked the button to add content, the sidebar goes away without adding the content to my page.

      I had to use IE to add new content this morning. I have been using Google's portal in Firefox since it debuted without a hitch until this morning.

    18. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by spyrral · · Score: 1

      That is weird. I'm using 1.0.5 on Win XP Pro, and all the dhtml works fine for me. What extensions are you running, if you don't mind my asking?

    19. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by spyrral · · Score: 1

      How is it overboard? I think it's a great feature. The little "sliding over" animation makes the transition to the interface less jarring. It's a visual cue to the user that the are seeing something that was hidden. If it just appeared, they might think the page had reloaded. And page reloads for interfaces like this are what google and the rest of the modern webdev world is trying to get away from.

    20. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Feh. It's going to be really hard to be an elitist techno jerk with you people here always reminding us who the intended users of the product are!

    21. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by ThirdOfThree · · Score: 1

      I just figured it out. It was the Google Suggest Greasemonkey script. That script didn't even work on the google.com/ig page from the get-go; I had forgotten that it was still installed. Problem solved by disabling the the page (used http*://*google.com/ig*) from the script.

    22. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      That would be like taking your car into the mechanic with a transmission problem and having him scoff at you, "Pffft. Go build yourself a new one. Moron."

      I'll go one further: I'm perfectly capable of hacking out HTML as the need arises, but sometimes I don't want to. I've used my.yahoo.com as my homepage for years because it's trivially easy to add new information. Want Reuters headlines? Click - it's there. Want to track mutual funds? Click - there they are. Want to track the weather both where I'm currently at and where I expect to be next week? Click - done.

      There's no reason why I couldn't do that stuff myself, but Yahoo!'s put a slick interface on it and made it more convenient than I could've done on my own. My days are full enough as it is. This is one less thing to mess around with and I like it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    23. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Google's portal lacks too many features still, and I don't think they have any plans to add some of these.

      Yahoo has essential features like a Calendar, a place to keep files, I can list my 300 bookmarks in a hierarchy (Google just has one big list), Yahoo Mail lets me send email with my own email addresses in the "From:" line (Gmail uses Reply-to:, which ain't the same), which allows me to keep using the 10+ email addresses for different purposes (one for usenet, one for recruiters, one for mailinglists, one for personal, etc).

      The Calendar, Todo List, Address book all sync with any palm device or any Outlook-compatable office program (Evolution included).

      Gmail's address book doesn't support most of the information when I import my address book from Outlook or Evolution.

      These are critical features in my book. I want ONE set of stuff which is consistant at my home, on the web, on my Palm, in my phone, etc. Google doesn't do this for most of their features.

    24. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by anaesthetica · · Score: 1
      Oh, I agree that there really isn't a great way to indicate the opening of a new pane of content other than what Google did with the DHTML slide-over.

      The only other options would be to pop open a window--but then you have to deal with window-targeting nonsense and a totally broken UI-metaphor.

      I guess my real beef is: it's trying to do things that applications can do, but without the proper tools to do them. And that's not Google's fault: web standards and scripts aren't particularly powerful yet and don't allow for graceful ways to achieve things that an interface builder for a normal application would. They did the best they could with what meagre tools the web provides them with.

      Still, instead of trying to force a smooth sliding effect, they could simply open the left-pane without a big to-do. They could use other visual cues for the user to indicate that this wasn't page-reloaded content (they manage to do this with Gmail fairly well, when switching between conversation and inbox views, without actually reloading the page).

    25. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by MikeWeller · · Score: 1

      This looks a bit like Microsoft's experimental http://www.start.com/myw3b/ site

    26. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      The point there is not just have all the news of the sites you visit in one page, is that you can access the same info everywhere. Ok, i can have that local personal portal made for myself, with all that info (in fact, i have) but having it at google give me access to it from everywhere, everytime.

    27. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by jbarr · · Score: 1

      While you may not like the portal concept, the reality is that many do. I personally like good portals because they let me access the information I want to see from anywhere I'm Web-connected.

      The last thing I want to do is to have to plug in a ThumbDrive and load in some client that may or may not work on the computer I'm currently using.

      The portal concept is really fantastic...until the sponsoring company turns it into an ad machine. Once that happens, it's off to another portal.

      Google's "account integration" is also nice--just be SURE to log off when you are though, otherwise others could access your Gmail and Google Groups account...

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    28. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Eh, I don't see how this is too different from My.Yahoo.com. That My Yahoo! page is pretty slimed down, you can add RSS feeds just like with Google, and arrange them into various 'pages,' if that suits your fancy. About the only thing I see that's definitely in Google's favor on this 'RSS personalized homepage' is that Google doesn't show ads, while the My Yahoo! page has a big ol' ad right at the top of the page.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    29. Re:Countdown until Google.com looks like by Stormy+Henderson · · Score: 1

      It won't work for me either (FF 1.0.6). It's dropping my login whenever I try to save changes.

      I disabled all Google-oriented extensions, no help.

  3. your other... by frieked · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...right. Seems like someone doesn't know their left from their right.

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
    1. Re:your other... by SeventyBang · · Score: 1



      And once again, someone posting the parent story doesn't know it's from its.

      Anyone keeping count? (how many in a row is this?)

      I think if its were used in every parent story, they'd have a 98% chance of being correct. Rarely is it's actually used|needed.


  4. Gmail by daviq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they are just adding more of gmail's features too their homepage.

    --
    Go to the w3.org and put Slashdot.org through the validator.
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. How freaking difficult is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    It seems that Google has added new features to it's Personalized Home.

    "It's" = "It is". The possessive is "its". Why is that so freaking difficult to grasp?

    And not being a 14-year-old who just copied and compiled hello.c, I will use the appropriate "=" rather than the pompous but incorrect "=="...

    1. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by badfish99 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "It's" = "It is". The possessive is "its". Why is that so freaking difficult to grasp?

      Because it's illogical: most other possessives have an apostrophe. And a short survey of modern English usage (as seen, for example, on Slashdot) will tell you that the usage is changing: quite possibly the apostrophe in the possessive "it's" will be the norm in a few years time.

      Still, I'm glad you're not pompous.

    2. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by snorklewacker · · Score: 1, Informative

      > Because it's illogical: most other possessives have an apostrophe.

      Like Your's, Hi's, Her's, Their's, and Our's?

      I wish the language would evolve in the opposite direction and lose the apostrophe, everywhere.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    3. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by mothz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      a short survey of modern English usage (as seen, for example, on Slashdot) will tell you that the usage is changing

      I fear the day that Slashdot is used as the standard form of English. I'm not looking forward to hearing this:
      "I, for one, welcome our drive-through overlords to McDonalds! In Soviet Russia, fries would like you with that!"

    4. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by Q2Serpent · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Welcome to grammar school.

      All possessive pronouns do not use apostrophes.

      His
      Hers
      Yours
      Mine
      Theirs
      Ours
      Its

      There is no magic to this rule.

    5. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's illogical: most other possessives have an apostrophe.

      Nouns, yes. Pronouns, no. It's "its" like "his" and "hers". "Her's" is (obviously) wrong as is "hi's". What's the problem. It's actually very simple.

      Yes, language evolves. It's just a shame when this happens because of laziness and aviodable ignorance.

      Front page of /. has basic grammatical errors. Is this likely to attract new visitors or warn them off of a "geek" site?

      Good grammar means girls talk to you. (Not true, but worth a try.)

    6. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're stupid. The language doesn't change because some idiots get it wrong.

    7. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by grammarbitch · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't there be a slightly different standard for a post on the main page, read by hundreds of thousands? It doesn't reflect an "evolution of modern English," it reflects contempt for English usage in a "don't tell me all your fancy book-learnin'" kinda way.

    8. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by zkam · · Score: 1

      True, the apostrophe is not used in posessive pronouns like his/hers, however it used for proper nouns, like "That is John's car." So it is confusing in that way.

      However, the way I approach the its/it's confusion is to think of the other use for the apostrophe, i.e. in a contraction. The apostrophe is taking the place of one or more letters. So, if you mean to say "it is", then you replace it with the contraction "it's" (in the same way that you replace "cannot" with "can't".)

    9. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by blamanj · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? Americans have been misspelling "colour" for a couple hundred years, and now "color" is the standard.

    10. Re:How freaking difficult is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be stupid, ou->o is Noah Webster's spelling reform, not an accidental mistake.

  7. Google not the innovator here. by ballstothat · · Score: 1, Informative
    My Yahoo! has had this RSS feed via portal-page for a while now, and Google is simply playing catch-up to their competitor.

    Its not always Google that is the new hotness.

    --
    10
    20 Print "Balls To That"
    1. Re:Google not the innovator here. by malfunct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been using features like this on My MSN for ages (2 or 3 years now). Its not that Google hasn't created something good (since I like My MSN a great deal) its just that people shouldn't always jump to the conclusion that they are always ahead of the curve.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Google not the innovator here. by Momoru · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course when Yahoo did it, it didn't make Slashdot news. Don't worry, in a couple of month's people will start claiming Yahoo ripped that feature off of Google.

    3. Re:Google not the innovator here. by kpwoodr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you believe this? Yahoo has totally ripped off this way cool feature from google! They have this thing where you can add RSS feeds to your portal to get content from anywhere. Google has had it for a week, and now Yahoo! is jumping on the bandwagon. I'm not sure what this RSS thing is but I'm pretty sure google invented it. Man, they are the greatest company ever.

      --
      This sig has been removed pending an investigation.
    4. Re:Google not the innovator here. by ballstothat · · Score: 1
      Exactly! WTF is Yahoo doing ripping my g00gl3????

      Everyone knows how much more l33t g00gl3 is than yahlooser.

      --
      10
      20 Print "Balls To That"
    5. Re:Google not the innovator here. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      What are you new here? Google is good. Everyone else is bad... I don't care about facts that say otherwise... Google is the innovator dammit! (This is slashdot for crying out loud, you practically did the equivilent of praising Microsoft... no one in their right mind does that on slashdot...)

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    6. Re:Google not the innovator here. by ballstothat · · Score: 1
      You got that right.

      Thats why my comment was initially modded troll...

      --
      10
      20 Print "Balls To That"
    7. Re:Google not the innovator here. by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      But Google did it right.

    8. Re:Google not the innovator here. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      A more appropriate way of getting your point across would have been saying something like:

      "Yahoo somehow managed to time travel back in time to steal Google's great new innovative idea... those bastards!"...

      It has elements of sci-fi, our beloved time travel, and it implies Yahoo is evil (even though they are not), since only evil people travel back in time to gain an advantage. That, and the fact that it still gets the point across that Yahoo did it first... ;)

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    9. Re:Google not the innovator here. by Revenant+Reverend · · Score: 1

      True. I can't think of another webportal that allows you to customise it so completley. It eliminates many a hatred of webportals I've gotten from people that angle along the 'Its ugly/messy' lines.

    10. Re:Google not the innovator here. by generic-man · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yahoo! also has the advantage in that they have integrated RSS into their search. Notice that a few of the sites have "RSS: ... Add to My Yahoo!" in the search results. Very handy.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    11. Re:Google not the innovator here. by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      I heard that even Google ripped it off from the upcoming Apple OSX 10.7! Steve Jobs is god!

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    12. Re:Google not the innovator here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's customizable because you can... move the boxes? Give me a break.

    13. Re:Google not the innovator here. by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can. You can't drag the boxes around (yet) but it's far more customizable than Google's. Yes, it has ads, but Google plans to add ads to their customizable home page too.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    14. Re:Google not the innovator here. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Quit cheerleading for Google.

      Provide some evidence -- what did Google do right that Yahoo got wrong?

      Yahoo has essential features like a Calendar, a place to keep files, I can list my 300 bookmarks in a hierarchy (Google just has one big list), Yahoo Mail lets me send email with my own email addresses in the "From:" line (Gmail uses Reply-to:, which ain't the same), which allows me to keep using the 10+ email addresses for different purposes (one for usenet, one for recruiters, one for mailinglists, one for personal, etc).

      These are crit

    15. Re:Google not the innovator here. by 13bPower · · Score: 1

      hoo hoo, tell 'em fred.

  8. sorry but your browser is not supported by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft IE 5.5+ (download: Windows)
    - Netscape 7.1+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
    - Mozilla 1.4+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
    - Mozilla Firefox 0.8+ (download: Windows Mac Linux)
    - Safari 1.2.1+ (download: Mac)
    Many other browsers work with Gmail's basic HTML view, including:
    - Microsoft IE 4.0+
    - Netscape 4.07+
    - Opera 6.03+

    Konqueror users are still SOL

    1. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Konqueror users are still SOL"

      That's good to hear.

    2. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh no!
      Lynx users are SOL too!

      Seriously though, they did manage to make sure it works with 99.5% of all the web browsers currently out there. Nobody is forcing you to be that 0.5%.

    3. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you've got 8 options there.
      What features does Konqueror have over the others listed, that make worth using despite incompatibilities?

    4. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by oever · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm using konqueror 3.4.1 with default authentication and the site works very well. It's amazing what google can do with javascript!

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    5. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      1. On my Suse 9.3 pro box fonts are razor sharp, crystal clear, bold and very pleasant to look at all day.

      2. Web archiver. I use it frequently.

      3. Split windows.

      4. Perfect integration into my OS. None of the others do that at all, even to the slightest degree.

      There are other minor things. But it's more of a situation of what I DON'T LIKE about the other browsers. I simply do not like them.
      First of, M$ is not even in the picture here, nor is MAC.
      That leaves Opera, which has SHIT for fonts.
      And then there is Firefox which has too few features and options, plus, I don't like the fonts in it either.

      In 99% of my browsing, Konqueror suits all my needs and does an outstanding job. On some very rare occasions I run across an oddball site and have to resort to dragging up Firefox, namely when doing any of the google goodies, like gmail or google maps, etc..
      Plain old google.com searching works fine.

      If 99% of the people like to eat spinach should I too be forced to eat spinach?

      I don't know if it's a case of google telling KDE/Konq to go to hell or if it's KDE/Konq not wanting to or unable to make Konq and Google work with each other but I wish someone would get on the stick and fix it.

    6. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a side by side comparison of firefox and konqueror.
      http://img223.imageshack.us/my.php?image=omfgx1309 ea.jpg

      I use a 21" Sony Trinitron CRT at 1400x1050 at 112hz
      Be aware that jpeg compression makes the fonts in this snapshot look *much* worse than they are when live.

      This is *after* I tweaked Firefox to use the same fonts (Suse Sans 12).. They do NOT look the same despite that they are both configured to use the same fonts at the same resolution.

      I rest my case.

    7. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Tack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Except for the size, they look the same to me. Same kerning, same antialiasing, same ligatures (observe the "ft" in "Lifts"). The fact that Firefox is rendering fonts smaller may or may not be a bug in Firefox. But have you tried increasing the font size in Firefox until they're the same, and then comparing?

      You may choose to use Konqueror for a list of valid reasons, but in terms of fonts, I think your case is far from rested.

    8. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/7453/omfgx1312q x.jpg

      Firefox does not render the fonts the same.
      In this image you can see that links in firefox are so heavy they just ugly. It does NOT look the same, no matter what size the fonts are set at.

      Looking at browsers all day is like looking at women.
      You may look at a woman and think "Wow, she's hot!" and I may look at her and think "Damn, that ho is fugly!" It's all a matter of personal preference.

      And here's Opera and Konq side by side
      http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/1686/omfgx1338e r.jpg
      and lastly, all three up at the same time..
      http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/9518/omfgx1349o b.jpg

      ALL three browsers are configured to use the Suse Sans 12. ALL three look very different despite that.

    9. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you use a $1000 video cable to make sure the image is "clean"?

      I just don't see the difference.

    10. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      How old is your copy of Konqueror? I'm using Konqueror with KDE 3.4 and the google page works great.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    11. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      None of the others do that at all, even to the slightest degree.

      *cough*Internet Explorer*cough*

      Teehee ;^)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    12. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If 99% of the people like to eat spinach should I too be forced to eat spinach?
      No, but you don't get to complain when someone gives the spinach eaters a free gift either.
    13. Re:sorry but your browser is not supported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i use konq as my primary browser and all the google services work fine, including google maps and gmail. sounds like you have a problem your install.

      i do get the message that you posted when i go to google maps but there's a link that says click here to try it anyway. and it works great under konq.

  9. Re:Top left by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is at the 'top left' here.

    He's talking about the computer 's right.

  10. A dud? by rueger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I played with it for five minutes and couldn't see much use. It wouldn't let me fine tune the news feed to suit my needs, or at least not in an obvious way, and didn't display the accompanying pictures from news stories.

    For whatever reason it won't display the weather for my location (Hamilton ON). I don't particularly like the way it displays my g-mail info, and would like to change the arrangement and width of the blocks.

    All in all this one actually looks like a beta - dull, uninspired, and not fully realized.

    1. Re:A dud? by garcia · · Score: 1

      Well, I played with it for five minutes and couldn't see much use.

      For someone that has *never* used an RSS feed I see a benefit: I don't need a program to see the RSS feeds as my browser goes straight to this page when it opens and I can see everything I need to see in one shot (except Slashdot which isn't up-to-date enough for me).

      Being that I don't know any better, with regards to how RSS feeds can be modified, I am quite happy with it. I can keep up w/my friends' RSS shit and I don't have to remember to go to their pages.

      YMMV.

    2. Re:A dud? by mboos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm in Toronto, and I can get the weather. What irks me though is the fact that the temperatures default to Fahrenheit. The current temperature also has a Celcius value (but it's secondary) and all the long term forecasts are in Fahrenheit. There is no option to change everything to Celcius. I was only taught Celcius in school, and was led to believe that Fahrenheit was left on the thermometers to appease the old-timers.

      This is the 21st century, people! Let's start using those SI units that everybody* has agreed on.

      *The States not included

      --
      --Mike Boos
    3. Re:A dud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can change the arrangement of the blocks.
      Click > Drag.

    4. Re:A dud? by Revenant+Reverend · · Score: 1

      When I first started using it as my homepage it was declared 'Beta' so it probably still is. At least I havent heard of anything saying it isn't. Just seems a highly popular public beta to me. I too would like further customisation of the boxes and what have you, but they already through a lot of the stuff I would have suggested they add (Sports comes to mind first...) so kutos to them. Hope to see more options later on.

    5. Re:A dud? by Photar · · Score: 1

      dull, uninspired, and not fully realized
      Woah, for a second I thought I was on deviantart.com.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    6. Re:A dud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I yawned again just like the first time I saw their portal. Let me know when it's actually useful like Bloglines.

    7. Re:A dud? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I like Celsius for weather. Its 0-100 scale makes sense to me: 0 is about as cold as I've ever experienced (being in the U.S.) and it almost never gets hotter than 100 where I am. I know how to freeze and boil water.

      Complaining about 33-degree temperatures just isn't as fun as complaining about temperatures in the 90s.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:A dud? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that should be "I like Fahrenheit for weather." I'm an idiot.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    9. Re:A dud? by bach_m · · Score: 0

      Living just an hour away from you, I found that entering a postal code works just fine. and if they have London, they must have hamilton.

    10. Re:A dud? by rjhall · · Score: 1

      I think you're confused.

      I agree that the 0-100 scale makes sense, and that freezing/boiling water points are easily recognised.

      I expect you have experienced 0c in the US. I expect you have experienced 100f in the US.

      I doubt, though, you've ever experienced 0f or 100c. 0f is -17c, which you'd see up in Canada or Alaska but not many places. 100c is 212f - pretty uncomfortable.

      I think the two meet at about -40...(actually,calculating the f=c point was a school exam question i did a long long time ago)

    11. Re:A dud? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I grew up in New York, now live in Pittsburgh, and spent time in the mountains of West Virginia this past January. I know how 0 degrees Fahrenheit feels. In the morning, my not-quite-dry hair freezes below 10F.

      My point is that the 0-100 scale on Fahrenheit makes sense for humans and temperature: it's uncommon to stray outside it in most of the lower 48 United States. As a human, I appreciate that.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    12. Re:A dud? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Get Sage it works within the mozilla extension system within the browser and is under a 100k download. It makes it easier at least for me than the current Google implentation as I have to viewing that page to use the feeds whereas with Sage I can be browsing Slashdot and see the RSS stories in a sidebar.

    13. Re:A dud? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, we Americans are too stupid to use another system of measurement. Your superiority in grasping a different arbitrary unit of measure is incontestable. On the other hand, you don't hear us whining as much. We're even.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:A dud? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      So why not apply that logic to driving speeds? 0-100 kph is much simpler that 0-60ish mph. Move to metric now, you know it makes sense :)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    15. Re:A dud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never drive faster than 60 mph? What kind of cars do they sell up in Canada?

  11. Does this thing work at all? by Augusto · · Score: 1

    I go to the weather section, I remove "Happy, TX" and add my zipcode and blam, it doesn't add my city and keeps "Happy, TX".

    I go to the "news" section and increase the number of stories from 3 to 5 and, nope, it keeps 3.

    I go add a "gmail" section and it does nothing?

    Is this thing working at all? I can't seem to be able to save / configure anything.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Does this thing work at all? by mrn121 · · Score: 1

      Not to sound like a jerk, but are you hitting "Save" at the bottom or "close edit" at the top? I only ask because I was making the same mistake. It is not entirely obvious at first glance.

    2. Re:Does this thing work at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea i'm having problems saving as well. looks like firefox doesn't like google's javascript cuz it works fine in IE.

    3. Re:Does this thing work at all? by Augusto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was hitting save but nothing.

      I just tried it on IE And it works, seems like it's a problem with my version of Firefox (perhaps a conflict with one of my extensions?)

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
    4. Re:Does this thing work at all? by Sp00nMan · · Score: 1

      We had the same problem here. Make sure you have the latest Java installed (1.5) and check out what plugins you have installed in Firefox. Once we removed all the plugins it worked. Don't know which plugin it was (adblock, noscript, stumble). Even disabling them didn't seem to help.

    5. Re:Does this thing work at all? by Augusto · · Score: 1

      I removed adblock, but that didn't seem to help at all ... (I have more extensions though ...)

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
    6. Re:Does this thing work at all? by mebob · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't have anything to do with java

      --
      =1000101
    7. Re:Does this thing work at all? by shr1n1 · · Score: 1

      Does fine for me. Using Firefox. Set my home page to this, Pretrty fast.

    8. Re:Does this thing work at all? by notmuchtosay · · Score: 1

      just set it up in IE and it will save it and work in FF...don't bother taking out extensions

    9. Re:Does this thing work at all? by MajroMax · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I was hitting save but nothing.

      I just tried it on IE And it works, seems like it's a problem with my version of Firefox (perhaps a conflict with one of my extensions?) Make sure you're accepting the relevant cookies from [www.]google.com; it sounds like Firefox is rejecting them, causing Google to load default content.

      --
      "Evil company X is threatening to restrict our rights! Let's all get together to stop--OOOH! SHINEY!!!" -- AC
    10. Re:Does this thing work at all? by Christianfreak · · Score: 1

      Java != Javascript!!!

      No Java in that page. Likely your 'noscript' plugin was the culprit.

    11. Re:Does this thing work at all? by Fredden · · Score: 1

      You need to be signed in with your google account to save the changes. it says it in pretty readable type on the left in a blue box. i thought that was obvious, perhaps not...

      --
      Space is limited
      in a haiku; so it's hard
      to finish what you
    12. Re:Does this thing work at all? by th3space · · Score: 1

      Just fired up my laptop and loaded firefox...the personalized homepage (with changed news item amounts, added sections and Gmail) seems to be working fine.

      My FF version is 1.0.6 and I have the following extensions: FlashGot (0.5.9.7), Adblock (0.5.2.039), NoScript (1.0.9), ForecastFox (0.8.1.1), Tabbrowser (1.2.7.1), Gmail Notifier (0.4.3), StumbleUpon (2.02), ImageZoom (0.1.7.1), Download Tweak (0.6.6), FoxyTunes (1.1.1), fireFTP (0.88.3), ShowIP (0.7.10), SessionSaver2, Flashblock (1.2.9), DictionarySearch (0.9.2), MediaPlayerConnect (0.3.10) and MapIt! (0.7.1).

      So I don't think it is any of those (or a combination thereof) that is causing the problem...

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
    13. Re:Does this thing work at all? by ThirdOfThree · · Score: 1

      My problem was a Greasemonkey script that was affecting the google.com/ig site.

      If you are using Greasemonkey, exclude http*://*google.com/ig* from your scripts and it should solve the problem.

    14. Re:Does this thing work at all? by almostmanda · · Score: 1

      It's really buggy in Firefox. Things don't save like they should, and a couple of times it just reloaded as a blank page. I finally lost my patience and set it up in IE. It's much snappier in IE, and then I can save it and have Firefox just load the new layout.

    15. Re:Does this thing work at all? by jeffChuck · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should click on "save" before you close the edit window?

    16. Re:Does this thing work at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Customize Google extension breaks a bunch of parts of google.com/ig

  12. Selling out (again)? by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Has Slashdot been bought by Google? I'm serious. I don't read those Slashback articles. I've been noticing an average of about 3 Google themed articles a day and it seems like a lot, even controlling for dupes.

    1. Re:Selling out (again)? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah! If Google had bought Slashdot, they would have renamed it gDot.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Selling out (again)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, and the fact that you were modded the way you were is indicative of /. users in general. Anyone who knocks Google, Linux, or open source in general is a dork to be modded down.
      Since I'm posting as AC, I could really care less, but /. readers, on the whole, are intolerant to any views but those of the consensus.

      Let me spell it out:

      Google is not the be all and end all.
      Linux is not the be all and end all.
      Open source is not the be all and end all.

      People have a right to their opinions even if they disagree with the consensus. As far as I'm concerned, diversity is a good thing.

      Google is to the Internet now what Altavista was in 1996. Yahoo will be around when Google is but a distant memory in the has been pages.

    3. Re:Selling out (again)? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      As far as I'm concerned, diversity is a good thing.

      As long as it's "free as in beer" and runs on Linux, otherwise, hit the road...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Selling out (again)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found since google went from 4 billion pages to 8 billion, the search quality went down by about 1/2. If they drop much more, then they won't be the top search engine out there anymore and that will move their ad revenue off to someone else who will grow to be too big and the cycle repeats.

    5. Re:Selling out (again)? by MynockGuano · · Score: 4, Funny

      It may yet happen...and in the meantime, we can say we're "Waiting for gDot".

    6. Re:Selling out (again)? by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      The reason he was modded down was because it wasn't a comment on the discussion (offtopic--the topic is the new features on the google.com/ig, not business dealings of any kind), it was worded to incite an argument (flamebait), and it was a deliberately false assertion (troll--if Google bought SlashDot/OSDN, we'd know about it). Seems like he's got it all covered, to me.

    7. Re:Selling out (again)? by guaigean · · Score: 1

      So I'm guessing the free-as-in-speech beer didn't impress you?

      --
      Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    8. Re:Selling out (again)? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      The same folks who label everyone else 'mindless consumers' practically paint the ceiling everytime someone mentions "Google", or to a lesser extent "Apple". It's geek herd mentality, which geeks insist they're too smart to fall for.

      Instead of thinking of the endless supply of "someone took a shit at Google today" articles as a waste of space, think of it as an opportunity to observe pre-Borg-like behavior in nerds across the world. It's also an hypocrisy laugh-in that just never stops giving.

      So sit back, sip the coffee, and watch the show....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    9. Re:Selling out (again)? by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      What's someone with a scrap of non-technical intelligence doing on slashdot? And moderators actually doing a good job? What is the world coming to?

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    10. Re:Selling out (again)? by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      We apologize for the fault in the comments. Those responsible have been sacked.

    11. Re:Selling out (again)? by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 1

      We again apologize for the fault in the comments. Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked, have been sacked.

  13. Re:Top left by mendaliv · · Score: 0

    Maybe it goes backwards in the southern hemisphere...

  14. The best software company in the world? by bigbinc · · Score: 0
    # Preview latest Gmail messages # See headlines from Google News and other top news sources # Get weather forecasts, stock quotes, and movie showtimes # Select from a variety of popular feeds # Drag and drop the sections to rearrange the page Oh boy! Give Google credit for linking up Google maps and Nasa's lunar images. But come on, the smartest people on the planet and they are doing RSS feeds.

    I want to see you guys develop a new programming language and thwart Java's dominance. New desktop operating system.

    Quit with the weeny web crap.

    --
    ---- Berlin Brown http://www.newspiritcompany.
  15. More Like... by kaellinn18 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd rather see today's news instead of last week's!

    --

    --------
    This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
  16. unhelpful by deconvolution · · Score: 0

    I am sure there are many people like me to watch the slashdot/onion/etc. news source from that kind of homepage and completely forget the search job.

  17. wait..! by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0

    So, they released this feature some 2-3 months in advance ONLY TO ME??????

    1. Re:wait..! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      piss off

    2. Re:wait..! by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Apparently so. I just got this today.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  18. Because... by pickyouupatnine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "... Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed? ..." .. Because replies like this one make Slashdot useless from time to time, and sometimes its fun to read what other sites like The Register and The BBC have to say ;).

    --
    _Vishal www.squad9.com
  19. awesome by fender_rock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    awesome, now i dont even have to search on google for my torrents if i can add the rss feeds!
    too bad limewire doesnt have rss feeds for its files...

  20. Not updated by Tyrsenus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To bad when you add /. to your homepage the news links aren't updated real-time. This article doesn't even appear as of the time I'm writing this!

    1. Re:Not updated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the humanity!

    2. Re:Not updated by comwiz56 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That would be a matter of slashdot's RSS policy (30 min between checks), not Google's fault.

  21. Slashdot feed by soboroff · · Score: 5, Funny


    It's good to be reminded that Slashdot is a Technology, not a Lifestyle.

  22. Not working on firefox? by quark007 · · Score: 1

    I am trying to get it to work on Firefox. It just won't add any content although it renders the already added content correctly! Ofcourse, it works great on IE.

    --
    - Sh!t
    1. Re:Not working on firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's one of your extensions. For mee it was the google customize extension. I removed it and problem solved...

    2. Re:Not working on firefox? by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      Worked fine for me in Firefox 1.06/Windows... Odd :|

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
    3. Re:Not working on firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works perfectly on Firefox here (running on Linux).

    4. Re:Not working on firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word has it turning of the Google Suggest option will fix it

  23. http://www.angryflower.com/itsits.gif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Repeating by fastbyte · · Score: 1

    History repeating on slashdot too much!

  25. Re:News? by rogueuk · · Score: 1

    adding rss feeds is new. Before you only had a few selections of the sites that google would let you add. Now you can add whatever you want, as long as there is an rss feed

  26. highly editorialized? by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not complaining about Google's choices of feeds on the personalized homepage, because I actually like what they've offered -- but I can see how someone else might be offended at their editorial judgment. For example, (at least in the previous version, maybe also this one) the news choices were NYT, BBC, and other (generally) reputable sources. Now they also have Washington Post and others.

    But I can see how someone might see this as liberal bias. "Where's my Washington Times, or Fox News feed??" And then some people will complain the other way -- "How come I can't get my Democracy Now feed on the home page??"

    Maybe I just take the position that I like their choices and to those who complain about not having their own right-wing news feeds available, I say, go and create your own Google, losers. On the other hand, is it dangerous for one company to filter the available options so dramatically? You don't have to use their homepage, but when one provider is so dominant, you can't avoid issues like that...

    ps. I believe the page now lets you input your own choice of xml feeds...

    1. Re:highly editorialized? by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Informative

      They've got the RSS option, so you can pull any data source in RSS that you'd like into the Portal.

      Fox News (US & World) RSS Feed
      Fox News RSS List

      The Washington Times appears to offer their headlines via RSS only to subscribers.

      Democracy Now

    2. Re:highly editorialized? by Morinaga · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There has been accusations of bias on both sides, for example here they claim Google shows a tendancy towards conservative bias, http://www.ojr.org/ojr/technology/1095977436.php

      This one claims liberal bias, http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archiv es/2005/05/04/google-accused-of-liberal-bias/

      The truth is that Google news simply shows results that are more left and right instead of just stuff in the middle. I like to see this approach more than a homogenized result. http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050520-1325 05

      As far as staple feeds showing bias, well you can do an RSS search (called "Create a Section" on the bottom left) an add anything you like to your news feeds such as Fox News or whatever you care for such as a specific conservative blog. It's actually quite easy and simple to use. It avoids having to use a seperate RSS reader and removes some of the technical intimidation that RSS offers an average user. Just for grins I tried Shacknews.com and instapundit.com, both feeds worked like a charm.

    3. Re:highly editorialized? by xandroid · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem to like MediaWiki-generated RSS files (e.g. Wikipedia's Recent changes); after hitting the Go button nothing changes...

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
  27. Re:Top left by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    I'm inebriated you insensitive clod!

  28. Bash.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any rss feeds for bash someone can help me with?

    1. Re:Bash.org by Golden_Eternity · · Score: 1
  29. about time by fender_rock · · Score: 1

    its about time google added rss feeds. yahoo has had it for a while, so has metarss, newsburst and others. personally, i prefer live bookmarks in firefox. no ads and you dont have to go to any site first.

    1. Re:about time by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      To use an RSS feed on google you don't end up with any ads either. Google doesn't have ads on it's main page.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  30. Add RSS capability to the Google toolbar by WordUpCousin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One feature I noticed on the new personalized Google site was that you can add your own RSS feed. Google should integrate this into their toolbar (like Yahoo's toolbar), in case some users aren't really sure how to find the RSS file associated with each website. Instead, the toolbar should recognize that an RSS feed is available and a button should appear stating something like "Add this RSS feed to Personal Google page".

  31. Konqueror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm very happy to see that it runs great on Konqueror too.

  32. How do you make money with this? by quark007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given GOOG stock is at all time high, my question is how does Google plan to make money with these free products?

    Google can not really commercialize this portal with the fear of getting sued by the news media.

    Or does it think that by giving away these freebies, it would attract more users to their search engine which seems to be the primary source of all their profits.

    Can anyone justify the price for google stock?

    --
    - Sh!t
    1. Re:How do you make money with this? by base3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're going to make money selling dossiers on us to corporations, governments, and the rich. Imagine what a politician could do with the Google searches of one of his enemies and all his family members. Will this somehow be avoided? I doubt it, but only time will tell.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:How do you make money with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does Google make money from it? Easy...

      2. ???

      See? It's quite simple.

    3. Re:How do you make money with this? by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      The RSS feeds business model makes a lot of sense for google. A service like this can get a lot of people to set google as there homepage, and frees them from having to provide any real content, just the ability to parse RSS feeds, it also ensures that the new user almost exclusively uses google search.

      For example, getting joe six-pack off of the default msn or comcast pages to google could greatly increase the bottom line of their pay per click advertising, even if each of those average users just did five or ten more google searches a day.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:How do you make money with this? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      The first time Google rolled out this home page, Google stated that they would eventually put ads on it. They already put ads all over Gmail based on the mail you receive, so it's only natural for them to put ads on your home page based on what you view.

      As for the stock price -- $300/share for a company that lives and dies by text ads? I'd wait for the correction.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  33. You know what would be cool ... by roubles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... if someone could write a firefox plugin to sync bookmarks to and from the google personal page. That way all my firefox instances will have a consistent set of bookmarks.

    Currently they have a plugin that syncs to an FTP server. This is cool but not everyone has a web-accessible ftp server handy. Everyone can, however, personalize their google account.

    -- /* no comment */

  34. Oh SNAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his
    hers
    theirs
    its
    Your

    You might have pointed out that the period goes inside quoted text, ie:

    The possessive is "its."

    but that's a common enough mistake.

    Still, I'm glad you're not pompous.

    Pot, kettle, black.

    1. Re:Oh SNAP by Mahou · · Score: 1

      actually if the quotation marks are used for a word or phrase and not a quote then the punctuation goes outside, right?

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    2. Re:Oh SNAP by badfish99 · · Score: 1, Troll
      but that's a common enough mistake

      If it's common enough, it's not a mistake any longer.

    3. Re:Oh SNAP by UltimateRobotLover · · Score: 1

      In British English the full stop goes outside the quotes: far more intuitive (expecially for those who write well-formed XML)!

    4. Re:Oh SNAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you'd never say that for anything other than English.

      The 16 bit big endian instructions in the Itanium result in much higher gigabytes

      That's about how stupid it sounds when someone promotes ignorance as colloquial literacy.

    5. Re:Oh SNAP by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Oh SNAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      actually if the quotation marks are used for a word or phrase and not a quote then the punctuation goes outside, right?
      It's a question of whether you're writing in English or in American. In the former, the punctuation goes outside; in the latter, inside.
  35. Re:Top left by Ryz0r · · Score: 1

    He's talking about the computer's right

    Computers dont have any rights, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Peace, Love, Unity, Respect
  36. Re:Top left by MustardMan · · Score: 1

    No no, the confusion is between stage right and house right

  37. Change your UA by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Use Mozilla or Safari. It works fine.

  38. Re:Top left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Left where? In North Korea, commie?

  39. Google keeps doing it. by kay41 · · Score: 1

    Although this is another small step, it is important to realize that Google knows exactly what it is doing. Expanding its ability to offer a wide array of free services and utilities in an extremely user friendly way. This is why they are successful and why their stock price will continue to rise, despite its already booming level.

    --
    arl with a k - a blog of mine.
    1. Re:Google keeps doing it. by stockpicker_dude_78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's amazing how short people's memories are ... just a couple years ago, everyone was saying Microsoft knew exactly what it is doing, and before that it was Yahoo knows exactly what it's doing. The question/challenge for Google is how it will react as a company when the stock price drops and there's no money to fun these free initiatives. It's hard to "do no evil" when you are trying to figure out how to lift employee morale, report profitability and retain competitive advantages.

  40. Wiki's by r2q2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some people have community based wiki's that they might want to be updated on for recent changes.

    --
    My UID is prime is yours?
    1. Re:Wiki's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't seem to be able to add the RSS feed for WikiPedia or other MediaWiki sites, anyone else having this problem?

  41. won't work with customize google ff extension by frieked · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are running the customize google firefox extension these new features will work very poorly or not at all depending on what preferences you have set. Just an FYI for anyone having problems.

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
  42. It broke... by op12 · · Score: 1

    I'm at work so I'm using IE, but sliding open that menu made IE have an error. (I'm using IE 6.0)

  43. darnit! i was gonna make one by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    just today polished off my XP taskbar BBC news ticker. thought, hmm, with some more cunning coding i could use any feed and build a personalisable home page portal... f****g google

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  44. Well of course it is by Dread+Pirate+Shanks · · Score: 0, Troll
    Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

    This would make perfect sense, since it now seems that Google OWNS Slashdot...
  45. No it won't by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting
    quite possibly the apostrophe in the possessive "it's" will be the norm in a few years time
    It won't. A certain percentage of people have been making this mistake for at least all of my lifetime and probably for many decades longer, but the standard has remained unchanged. It takes a quite a bit of hubris to claim that the mistakes you make due to ignorance or incompetence are going to become a standard.
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:No it won't by AMD4L1PH3 · · Score: 1
      . .
      "It takes a quite a bit of hubris to claim that the mistakes you make due to ignorance or incompetence are going to become a standard."
      Oxford English Dictionary: If it genuinely fills a gap in the language, then it may well catch on among a significant section of the population and it will then have become part of the language , and if it is used in print (or can be traced, for example, in scripts or transcripts of broadcasts), it will fall within the sphere of the OED's Reading Programme. There are a number of genuinely invented words in the Oxford English Dictionary. As well as various terms for commercial and industrial products, they include:
      * blatant (Edmund Spenser, 1596) * blik (R.M. Hare, 1950) * camelious (Rudyard Kipling, 1902) * finnimbrun (Izaak Walton, 1653) * gigman (Thomas Carlyle, 1830) * Gondal (Emily and Anne Brontë, 1834) * googol (Dr Kasner's 9-year-old nephew, 1940) * grok (Robert Heinlein, 1961) * hobbit (J.R.R. Tolkien, 1937) * od (Baron von Reichenbach, c.1850) * panorama (R. Barker, 1789) * pushmi-pullyu (Hugh Lofting, 1922) * quark (M. Gell-Mann, 1964) * runcible (Edward Lear, 1871) * shazam (Whiz Comics, 1940) * shmoo (Al Capp, 1948) * slan (A.E. Van Vogt, 1940) * spoof (Arthur Roberts, 1884) * sukebind (Stella Gibbons, 1932) * tracklement (Dorothy Hartley, 1954) * vril (Edward Bulwer-Lytton, 1871)
      http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutdi ctionaries/inventedwords?view=print
      Frequently Asked Questions: How do you decide if a new word should go in an Oxford dictionary? We conduct a Reading Programme to collect examples of words in use. If we have enough examples to show that a word has genuinely achieved currency, then we add it to our list of candidates for inclusion, and the editors research its usage and draft an entry. The general rule of thumb for the OED is that any word can be included which appears five times, in five different printed sources, over a period of five years. Oxford's smaller dictionaries of current English may include words with a shorter history. Once a word has come to our attention, we will investigate sources such as film scripts or transcripts of broadcasts if they are available and seem likely to add to our knowledge of the word's origin. http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutdi ctionaries/choose?view=print
    2. Re:No it won't by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Why have you made a wholesale post of the OED rules for the inclusion of new words? I can't see the relevance at all. Read the five times rule. I've seen "its" written as "it's" more than five times in numerous places and yet the incorrect version isn't in the OED. We're not talking about new words here.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  46. Ask Yahoo! by mlk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love it. Ask Yahoo on Google.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  47. Trouble staying logged in? by FransUNC · · Score: 1

    Anyone else having trouble staying logged in? It won't stay signed in for more than a few minutes, which basically makes the site worthless when you have to resign in everytime. I use IE, and I've added google.com to my Sites list for cookies, but no dice. Think it could have something to do with having the temp files option set to "Check for newer versions of pages: every visit to the page"? I don't want to have to change this setting, though. Any suggestions?

  48. Shuttle launch by isorox · · Score: 1

    Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

    Because we want to subscribe to a tech site that mentions the shuttle has successfully launched for the frist time in over 2 years? It's on the front page of the BBC, why not slashdot?

    1. Re:Shuttle launch by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't worry, it's on there now, and later on, it'll be duped. ;)

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    2. Re:Shuttle launch by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

      Too busy posting conspiracy theories...

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
  49. been doing this on my.yahoo.com for months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who approved this story? there is nothing new or interesting about this.

  50. del.icio.us by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 1

    I tried to add my del.icio.us bookmarks rss feed.
    didn't work for me. has anyone tried it?

    1. Re:del.icio.us by Mr.+Mikey · · Score: 1

      I've tried it... doesn't work.

      It looks to me as if what Google is actually doing is letting us add RSS feeds from some sort of "approved list of feeds", rather than letting us add any feed we wish. If so, lame.

      --
      wants to be the first monkey to touch the monolith
    2. Re:del.icio.us by lieumorrison · · Score: 1

      "approved list of feeds" I don't believe this to be true. My podcast http://feeds.feedburner.com/Supplementalfeed works fine. (although I can't rule out an "unapproved list of feeds)

      --
      | Information is the currency |
    3. Re:del.icio.us by lieumorrison · · Score: 1

      I tried with Firefox 1.0.6 on Mac (OSX 10.3.9) and IE 6 on a PC running XP and I could not get the RSS feed to work. I tried my own podcast feed http://feeds.feedburner.com/Supplemental and that worked just fine.

      --
      | Information is the currency |
  51. A New Slashdot Homepage Feature by mcmediaman · · Score: 0, Troll

    Coming soon to the Slashdot Homepage...Obligatory Google stories every third submission!!! Oh wait...

  52. Weather by Len · · Score: 1

    Just use the weather for Ottawa, ON. It has the current temperature completely wrong, so it'll be just as useful in Hamilton as it is here. (And all but one of the numbers are in American units. Yay.)

  53. You can add an RSS feed... if Google approves by Mr.+Mikey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It looks as if Google will let you add an RSS feed, but only if that feed is from a short list of feeds they've made available.

    Is everyone else seeing this? Am I just making a mistake of some sort? I'd like to add my del.icio.us inbox RSS feeds.

    --
    wants to be the first monkey to touch the monolith
    1. Re:You can add an RSS feed... if Google approves by asah · · Score: 1

      just enter the feed url into the search box and it get added...

      --
      As artist turned engineer, I simultaneously long for and fear the day when it all becomes content again.
  54. You were taught wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was only taught Celcius in school, and was led to believe that Fahrenheit was left on the thermometers to appease the old-timers.

    No, Celcius is left on the thermometers to appease the metric crowd. Fahrenheit is far more useful for actual human usage, as one degree F is just about exactly what a human being can perceive as a temperature change.

    This is the 21st century, it's time to discard foolish beliefs, like "SI is actually useful in everyday life". It's not, it never will be. Give it up.

    1. Re:You were taught wrong... by faaaz · · Score: 1

      Something X is far more useful for actual human usage because reason Y

      Give it a rest. This argument is what you use with whatever you prefer against what you are unfamiliar with.

      I don't care myself. I have to know a lot of different units to function. I do believe the SI-units are the no-bullshit forms of measurement though.

      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
  55. Wasn't News when Yahoo Did It? by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

    Why wasn't there a Slashdot headline when Yahoo did this long ago? More importantly, does Slashdot get kickbacks from Google for incessantly reporting on every little move Google makes?

  56. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Months, not weeks.

  57. Lame bookmarking feature by otisg · · Score: 1

    Who's going to enter URLs + bookmark names by hand?
    They should just let me import my bookmarks from elsewhere. For example, from Simpy, using its REST API:
    http://www.simpy.com/simpy/service/api/rest/

    --
    Simpy
  58. Re:old news man by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

    Except that now you can stick listings from 500 news sites, 30 travel sites, 60 people's random blogs, and your favorite dozen shopping sites.



    Of course, if you wanted that, you could just go straight to Yahoo!.

    /duck

  59. But let's be positive here! by SamAdam3d · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice the very nicely done page customisation?
    Or are us nerds too jaded to recognise something nice and clean and pretty?

    And did you notice the "Ask Yahoo!" section that can be added?
    I for one think this is very nice. Now, instead of opening news.google.com, google.com, weatherchannel.com, and, of course, slashdot.org, i can see it all from one happy page!

    --
    I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. - Douglas Adams
  60. Will not load as Firefox home page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I open Firefox, I always get the demo/sign-in screen rather than my actual personalized Google. As soon as I click "sign-in" it loads. Don't think it's a problem with cookies since if I set the default Google page as my home, I always see my login information in the upper-right-hand corner when I load Firefox. My home page is set to http://www.google.com/ig#, so I don't see what the problem is - had this problem since the personalized home page first launched, and I was hoping it would go away with the new revision.

    Running Firefox 1.0.6 on Mac OS X 10.3.8

    1. Re:Will not load as Firefox home page... by BenDalton · · Score: 1

      My workaround for your issue is as follows: 1) install Firefox Gmail Notifier Plugin 2) set it to 'Automatically Log In' 3) set home page as a local html file with a meta refresh to google.com/ig 4) ???? 5) profit??

  61. tomorrows post by yohan1701 · · Score: 1

    "how google's personalized homepage works". I am sure my tomorrow there should be a post of how somebody ripped apart the source and figured out how the drap and drop stuff works( which is pretty cool)

  62. Feed URLs need .xml or .rss extension! by baadger · · Score: 1

    From what I can make out adding your own feeds requires a .rss or .xml extension and/or no query string.

    Otherwise the OK button does nudda.

  63. This working in Firefox for anybody? by dbucowboy · · Score: 0

    I can't get it to work in FF. Anybody get it to?

    --
    This just in! 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the population.
    1. Re:This working in Firefox for anybody? by SuperDJ · · Score: 1

      It didn't work for me, but I refreshed a couple times and it did.

      --
      RTJKJAS
    2. Re:This working in Firefox for anybody? by rupert0 · · Score: 1

      Works fine for me ..

      --
      RUPERT! I TOLD YOU TO WATCH THE BAGS! You were looking at the boys again, WEREN'T YOU.
  64. Oh god.... I'm stuck in an infinite loop by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    Click the slashdot article on goggle homepage, go to slashdot, click the google homepage article on slashdot go to google.....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  65. Subscribing vs. tickering... by baadger · · Score: 1
    MSN search has had rss feeds for all of it's search results (query: Slashdot) for ages. This is really neat because i'm currently subscribed to a few with Opera. This essentially means I can monitor new entries in MSN's index in (almost) realtime for such purposes as to:

    • Find out what my relatives are writing across the web (on forums for example) by using my surname (which is very uncommon)
    • Monitor the inclusion (not rank) of my webpages on the first 10 results on MSN (The feed only returns the first 10 results).
    It's nice that I can now add some feeds to my Google homepage, but what I would really like to see is a subscription service to show me whats new since I last signed in, wherever I am,.. rather than a news ticker. Then I wouldn't need to rely on Opera (which I only use at home) to remember what items from the feed i've already "marked as read"/deleted.
  66. did you have to ask? by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

    duh, so we can get the *real* technology news as well?

  67. Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?"

    For digg, of course.

  68. "New Features" by Hobbes828 · · Score: 1

    I for one am disappointed in the "new features" because although the add content sidebar is flashy and all, I don't change my content much so it is a bit unnecessary. On the other hand, they made a click on an e-mail from your gmail a new window now instead of same window, which I don't like, a decision that could have been remedied if the "Inbox" link once reading an e-mail in the new window took you to your inbox in the same window, but no, they left it as making another new window.... so many new windows... and /. is a place where i need not keep complaining about windows, people have done enough of that for everyone.

  69. it's/its by rherbert · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot editors need to print this out and tape it to their monitors: Bob the Angry Flower

    1. Re:it's/its by rherbert · · Score: 1

      Er, well, it looks like the one I previously linked to provides some handy information, but not it's/its specifically. So the editors should have this one as well: Bob the Angry Flower's Guide to it's/its

  70. Nothing compared to Yahoo and MyWay by Patik · · Score: 1

    MyWay.com already offers a much more customizable, ad-free homepage than Google which rivals Yahoo's. Unfortunately, only Yahoo has AFP news sections, plus a plethora of others that Google and MyWay do not have. The "most popular photos" are often amusing. If you haven't checked out Yahoo recently, do so, they made their UI pretty slick recently.

  71. Uh ... by Augusto · · Score: 1

    I am logged in, it even shows my gmail account name at the top. And as I mentioned before, it works in IE. So yes, I am logged in with my "google" account.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  72. Yahoo-Like? by amirl · · Score: 1

    Is it just me that it looks like Yahoo?

    --
    You can't get there from here.
  73. Until they add multiple pages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll stick with My Yahoo! for my portable, use anywhere RSS reader. I like the ability (in Google Homepage) to rearange/reorder items by dragging and dropping...much faster than My Yahoo! But, they need to add multiple pages. On My Yahoo! I have a page for News, one for Sports, one for Tech, one for Gossip, one for Friends (friends blogs), etc. Each page has anywhere from 5-10 feeds for that category.

    Google Homepage would be unusable with that many feeds all on one page.

  74. Start.com by alienfluid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Any wanna give MS's beta start.com a try? IMHO, it's much better in terms of usability, interface and aesthetics.

    1. Re:Start.com by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Wow! The word S . T . A . R . T appears, and changes colors when you refresh. This is amazing technology!

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Start.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, very neat. To bad it only seems to work in IE.

  75. Re:Add Bookmarks capability to the Google toolbar by JasonB · · Score: 1

    If they would add the new bookmarks suport to their toolbar, that would really be great. I continue to use the a9.com toolbar simply for the ability to share my bookmarks across multiple browsers and the ability to open a bookmark folder in a set of tabs.

    No other toolbar I know of can do that...

  76. Slashdot banned me by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Of course since Slashdot is already available from their default list of technology sites, why would you need the ability to include an RSS feed?

    I just re-added Slashdot and will try them again. Last time I got temp banned for accessing their RSS feed too often. I guess that's what happens if you have Google Fusion as your start page. I hope Google has since updated their service so for each account accessing their page, Google don't *always* ask for the RSS feeds you subscribe to.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  77. Yahoo! by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    Bah, I prefer yahoo better and think this google thing is fugly

  78. They even link to Yahoo by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Check out the Fun category, they have a "Ask Yahoo!" link.

  79. I still use Yahoo over Google. by Hatchback+Mustang · · Score: 1

    Its a ton easier. I use it for searching, news, mail, games, as a yellow pages and looking up movie times. At this point, and prolly for the next 5 years, yahoo will still be king!

  80. OK, found the problem, it's one of my extensions.. by Augusto · · Score: 1

    Should have been obvious ... it's the "CustomizeGoogle" extension;

    http://www.customizegoogle.com/

    Just disabling it seems to fix the problem. It's a great extension, but I'll have to do without it if I'm going to use it.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  81. amazing by atizle · · Score: 1

    I think its great, looks like it has an ajax component. A lot better than yahoo in my opinion, you can drag and drop what you want shown.

  82. Better workaround by Augusto · · Score: 1

    You have to disable "Google Suggest" (which is one of the main cool things about the extension) and it works ok.

    http://groups-beta.google.com/group/CustomizeGoogl e/browse_frm/thread/88a90e6e11f7b25b/669e3c5f5bb45 c65#669e3c5f5bb45c65

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  83. Page Refresh by SVHE · · Score: 1

    Could someone tell me why Google couldn't figure out how to stop its annoying habit of taking me back to iGoogle whenever it refreshes with multiple browsers open!

  84. Wikipedia by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

    I really wanted to add the Wikipedia New additions feed. :(

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special: Newpages&feed=rss

    No joy though.

  85. It works in Links... by rdwald · · Score: 1

    I've gotten Gmail's basic HTML view to work in Links (Lynx doesn't have https authentication). I'm sure Konqueror can do the same...

  86. OMG! by Khuffie · · Score: 1
    OMGZ0rz! Google are like, you know, SUCH copycats! Microsoft had this feature in start.com, and so did Yahoo! Omg!

    I love the slashdot mentallity. Whenever Microsoft does something, they automatically copied and ripped people off. Whenever Google does something, its new and cool and awesome.

    1. Re:OMG! by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware that MS and Yahoo had these features... wait, I remembered, I didn't use them because they're so fuking cluttered up!

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  87. awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now I've got Dailykos and Kuro5hin on there as well as Slashdot... thanks, Google!

  88. but Google does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its sleeker, its faster.
    Its shows my gmail..
    And its, oh, ooohh, Ajax based..
    This is sooo new guys, its so hot and its soo sweet. That your grand uncle will get wet just thinking about it..

  89. Opera 8 is supported in ajax mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The subject says it all, go away..

    btw 8.02 supports bit torent, where is that in FireChicken...

  90. another tech switch by nattoag · · Score: 1

    This makes one feel that we are heading towards another technology 'switch'. The forward flip was the movement away from 'novell netware' type thin clients to desktop-resident memory-hogging apps. The reverse flip is back to a more network based application approach brought to the fore by browser based applications like Gmail and now Google personalizations. With the access to applications/information becoming increasingly mobile and the proliferation of access devices (like cellphone, laptops, desktops etc.) it is only natural to move back the applications to the network and have a ubiquitous and seamless access. The network is becoming the computer once again.

  91. Platypus and Greasemonkey by bahwi · · Score: 1

    I'm using Platypus and Greasemonkey to eliminate Google's site down to a search box and the two buttons, "Google Search" and "I'm Feeling Lucky". Nothing else on the screen, nada. Of course, I'm using Better Search so the searches come with screenshots and other links, as well as notification of an RSS feed or not on the site. Very cool feature, btw. Google's homepage looks cool, but I'm happy with my shrunk down version already. =)

  92. where did maps go? by honold · · Score: 1

    anybody notice that google maps doesn't appear to be an option anymore? that's one of the main reasons i switched to /ig

  93. Google pointing to a Yahoo! service... by Ohmster · · Score: 1

    This is pretty interesting...when you go into to personalize your Google homepage, you get these various sections like "News", "Lifestyle" etc., that you can add to your page. If you click on the "Fun" section, you get three content options to add...and number two is "Ask Yahoo!" I guess they're returning the favor Yahoo! did them to get them to the top, much like what IBM did for Microsoft. For more on that historical review, go to: http://mp.blogs.com/mp/2005/07/s_9.html

    1. Re:Google pointing to a Yahoo! service... by dbk25 · · Score: 1

      I'm unsure whether Google's including "Ask Yahoo!" is class or chutzpah.

  94. Old News by Astrophizz · · Score: 1

    This has been around for ages, I remember putting that stuff on my page months ago, maybe even last year. It irritates me when Slashdot has posts like this. Someone should have the job of making sure the news isn't obsolete.

    1. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could add your own RSS feeds to /ig months ago??

  95. Copy of start.com by gooogle · · Score: 1

    I am surprised no one has pointed this out yet, but it's a copy of start.com:

    http://www.start.com/myw3b/

    --
    -- Binary Finary
  96. Has anyone ever noticed? by bl1st3r · · Score: 1

    I noticed today that Google has some of the UGLIEST output on the planet. None of their outputted HTML is XHTML compliant (as you would assume the leader in simplistic design would want) and their code is all just clumped together in a few hideously huge strings.

    Where's the pretty output Google? Where's the XHTML 1.0?

    -E

    --
    hrrm.