"'Can an alligator run the hundred-metre hurdles?'—that nobody has heard before? Any ordinary adult can figure that one out. (No. Alligators can’t hurdle.)"
Any good AI would say "Yes" to this question. You asked if it could run it, with no other variables, such as doing it correctly. For bonus points, the AI should handle such test queries as snarkily as possible.
Electricity is a much more easily created and stored form of energy, plus you can make it from almost anything, and it can power almost anything. This means they can be indirectly powered even by gasoline, maybe through a generator or something. Point I'm trying to make here is that once a car is electric, you can charge it through any way that generates electricity, and even if current green capacity can't foot all of the necessary electricity, any form can, and later on, when green technologies get better and produce more electricity than current tech, cars will still be able to accept the electricity if they're electric. Meanwhile, gas cars are going to always have a slowly dwindling supply of energy just by how it works.
That's still incorrect. Tor doesn't connect directly to exit nodes, but instead to a relay first, which then passes it through more relays and finally to an exit node. You could block the relays, but then there are bridge mode relays that are often on dynamic IP addresses which they could use to get onto the Tor network. Short of moving to an internet whitelist, blocking Tor is nigh impossible by design.
On the 3DS, you head to settings, other settings, and format system. Then you replace the SD card with a new one to avoid any further issues. This isn't rocket science here.
Have they tried looking into the Wayback Machine to see if it's holding the tweets? It'd hard to imagine that they're not archived somewhere from when they were public. The only question is if they'd be admissible as evidence from a source like Wayback instead of the direct site itself.
My grandpa has an internet connection for the sole purpose of having cameras in his house to watch him. The cameras are not compatible with WiFi encryption. If someone logs in and uses his internet to download, and the ISP ends up cutting off his internet to stop "his piracy", we won't be able to see the cameras or if he's fallen or needs help. I wonder what the ISPs will have to say then if he ends up dying because we couldn't see him?
Honestly, there really is no way to stop people from getting around every roadblock you put down. Walls can only stretch so far. The only way to prevent them from doing what they want is to either destroy the internet or kill everyone in the country. The first could even be worked around with possibly WiFi meshes or usb drop locations. If the government decides to do the second, well, can't exactly get around that when you're dead.
Eventually people are going to want phone makers to make Ratings mandatory to get sold on app stores, and once that happens, you can say goodbye to cheap mobile games, or mobile games in general. Fees and having to wait for your game to be reviewed when hundreds of new games pop up in the review queue daily will bring mobile gaming to its knees.
I would, but in reality, this sounds like a much better way to train voice recognition software than having only a single user teach a new instance of a program like current voice implementations. The more voice data, if they do it right, the more refined it might get for all users, not just the ones who train theirs regularly. If they do it right.
Re:Not 100% correct -- key can be changed and patc
on
PS3 Root Key Found
·
· Score: 1
How will the system tell if a game with the current key really is a game and not something else? Also, you're assuming Sony will bother publishing updates to all games. Sure, they might update the popular ones, but obscure ones they probably wouldn't bother with, leaving them unplayable forever.
Instead of having people connect to wifi spots with one password, have a unique passcode printed on every receipt for a business that's good for a day.
Since Americans is responsible for this decision, then how can we, or I, make up for it? I know saying "I'm sorry" isn't enough to fix this. What can we do to atone for this? While I can't seemingly do anything directly, as an American myself, I am also directly responsible for this. So what can an American do to atone for this?
Imagine if you could just pull up a web page, tell it where you want to go, where you are, and the closest idle taxi will pick you up and take you there. There'd be little reason to own a car if that worked.
If you're already being tracked, it's likely you're being tapped, and the moment you call a lawyer, bam, suddenly you don't exist anymore. Don't piss off the government. They're erase you without a second thought.
It seems like they're looking at this from the perspective of "Who, then why, then how". For some reason, I feel the correct order of figuring this out should be "Why, then how, then who". Why is the hardest part of this. You could easily solve it by saying "It's to damage the Iranian nuclear plant". That's could be a why, but it could also just be the method required for the "how". The why should be attempted first, who would gain from the Iranian facility being damaged, who could risk it going wrong, do they care about it going wrong, what resources are needed, many variables need to be solved before you choose a who or you'll see traces of your predetermined "who" whenever you look for the "why", and "how".
How to fix this? They send warnings to people that older models of Sixaxises and Dualshock3s will be disabled, and run a replacement program for controllers that has you send in your disabled controller for a fixed one. At a fee and your own shipping costs, of course.
Slashdot Mirror
"'Can an alligator run the hundred-metre hurdles?'—that nobody has heard before? Any ordinary adult can figure that one out. (No. Alligators can’t hurdle.)"
Any good AI would say "Yes" to this question. You asked if it could run it, with no other variables, such as doing it correctly. For bonus points, the AI should handle such test queries as snarkily as possible.
PGP encrypted snail mail, then.
Electricity is a much more easily created and stored form of energy, plus you can make it from almost anything, and it can power almost anything. This means they can be indirectly powered even by gasoline, maybe through a generator or something. Point I'm trying to make here is that once a car is electric, you can charge it through any way that generates electricity, and even if current green capacity can't foot all of the necessary electricity, any form can, and later on, when green technologies get better and produce more electricity than current tech, cars will still be able to accept the electricity if they're electric. Meanwhile, gas cars are going to always have a slowly dwindling supply of energy just by how it works.
Now who do we report this to, then?
Have you tried out Sandboxie? It does pretty much what you're describing.
That's still incorrect. Tor doesn't connect directly to exit nodes, but instead to a relay first, which then passes it through more relays and finally to an exit node. You could block the relays, but then there are bridge mode relays that are often on dynamic IP addresses which they could use to get onto the Tor network.
Short of moving to an internet whitelist, blocking Tor is nigh impossible by design.
Why not change the color of the bar to yellow when something is taking longer than expected (with perhaps some additional effect for the color blind)?
On the 3DS, you head to settings, other settings, and format system. Then you replace the SD card with a new one to avoid any further issues.
This isn't rocket science here.
I think he was more referring to the distributors of the bootleg CDs, which probably do make a hefty profit off of their piracy.
Have they tried looking into the Wayback Machine to see if it's holding the tweets? It'd hard to imagine that they're not archived somewhere from when they were public. The only question is if they'd be admissible as evidence from a source like Wayback instead of the direct site itself.
My grandpa has an internet connection for the sole purpose of having cameras in his house to watch him. The cameras are not compatible with WiFi encryption. If someone logs in and uses his internet to download, and the ISP ends up cutting off his internet to stop "his piracy", we won't be able to see the cameras or if he's fallen or needs help. I wonder what the ISPs will have to say then if he ends up dying because we couldn't see him?
Honestly, there really is no way to stop people from getting around every roadblock you put down. Walls can only stretch so far. The only way to prevent them from doing what they want is to either destroy the internet or kill everyone in the country. The first could even be worked around with possibly WiFi meshes or usb drop locations.
If the government decides to do the second, well, can't exactly get around that when you're dead.
Eventually people are going to want phone makers to make Ratings mandatory to get sold on app stores, and once that happens, you can say goodbye to cheap mobile games, or mobile games in general. Fees and having to wait for your game to be reviewed when hundreds of new games pop up in the review queue daily will bring mobile gaming to its knees.
I would, but in reality, this sounds like a much better way to train voice recognition software than having only a single user teach a new instance of a program like current voice implementations.
The more voice data, if they do it right, the more refined it might get for all users, not just the ones who train theirs regularly.
If they do it right.
They'll just put you in lockup for contempt and let the other prisoners kill you.
Okay, I won't.
How will the system tell if a game with the current key really is a game and not something else?
Also, you're assuming Sony will bother publishing updates to all games. Sure, they might update the popular ones, but obscure ones they probably wouldn't bother with, leaving them unplayable forever.
"Why should I have to change my name, he's the one that sucks!"
So you shouldn't stand with someone if you think all of you will be punished?
Instead of having people connect to wifi spots with one password, have a unique passcode printed on every receipt for a business that's good for a day.
Since Americans is responsible for this decision, then how can we, or I, make up for it?
I know saying "I'm sorry" isn't enough to fix this. What can we do to atone for this? While I can't seemingly do anything directly, as an American myself, I am also directly responsible for this. So what can an American do to atone for this?
Imagine if you could just pull up a web page, tell it where you want to go, where you are, and the closest idle taxi will pick you up and take you there.
There'd be little reason to own a car if that worked.
If you're already being tracked, it's likely you're being tapped, and the moment you call a lawyer, bam, suddenly you don't exist anymore.
Don't piss off the government. They're erase you without a second thought.
It seems like they're looking at this from the perspective of "Who, then why, then how".
For some reason, I feel the correct order of figuring this out should be "Why, then how, then who".
Why is the hardest part of this. You could easily solve it by saying "It's to damage the Iranian nuclear plant". That's could be a why, but it could also just be the method required for the "how". The why should be attempted first, who would gain from the Iranian facility being damaged, who could risk it going wrong, do they care about it going wrong, what resources are needed, many variables need to be solved before you choose a who or you'll see traces of your predetermined "who" whenever you look for the "why", and "how".
How to fix this? They send warnings to people that older models of Sixaxises and Dualshock3s will be disabled, and run a replacement program for controllers that has you send in your disabled controller for a fixed one. At a fee and your own shipping costs, of course.