iran doesnt invade any country actively, but they invade them through the religious terorrist organizations they fund. hezbollah, hamas, ibda-c, numerous groups trying to invade pakistan, afghanistan are just a few.
if you are not able to discern about an important satire making a point regarding misconceptions and bullsh@t going on in the society about video gaming ?
see, in total, only the 'leading' people have walked away with $487 mn in pay last year. thats half a billion. half a billion is paid to actors.
its not the acting, its not the effort. noone is getting a plastic surgery or a skin recoloring or transplant or anything to act. its just a race of prestige in between actors and actresses. i want more pay. why ? because a certain someone i know and compete with got such a pay and i want more...
no sir. noone can justify what shit we are being put through while paying $20 a dvd, while an actor gets $80 mn for a few movies.
There are no laws of nature outside of mans conceptual innovations to begin with. There simply isn't. Your entire premise is founded in that very same realm. The population size doesn't matter either, it's not about how may there are, it's about who can do what and what with their surroundings. We can anthropomorphism anything we want but the simple fact remains that we rule.
f=ma is a law. observable, solid, valid laws for our locale of the universe. 'superiority' is a human perceptional invention.
BTW, you do realize that people go swimming in the ocean all the damn time without being killed by Sharks or Giant Squids. You should also realize that people take tools into the ocean and hunt sharks and squids all the time too. That's what makes Humans superior.
3/4 of your planet is water. if you wander into a desert or mountain, you will probably come back without getting attacked by wolves. what matters is, what happens when you chance up with one.
No, History is filled full of examples of evil winning battles but in the end, good always prevails. And yes, Nazis did attempt to negotiate with allies about a surrender that didn't involve them getting killed. Much of that was used as evidence of wrong doings in trials after the war. But go ahead and think you are UBER COOL and Super smart- it's really getting you somewhere here.
again you dont know about history, yet you are speaking with surety. nazis never negotiated with anyone. WEHRMACHT did. this might be a good time for you to do a search about wehrmacht and read up. especially what it meant in between 1918-1945.
Jesus Chirst dude, are you fucking stupid? We just went through this, The german's used violence first so violence in return was justified. Christ, what is so hard to understand about that? You don't go around harming and killing people unless they are doing it to you. If everyone believed that, we wouldn't have half of the problems we have now. And you wouldn't need to be so scared of the evil moooslims.
you are choosing not to get it.
germans DIDNT USE ANY MILITARY FORCE UNTIL THEY WERE FAR SUPERIOR THAN ANY ARMY THAT COULD OPPOSE THEM. get this in your head. germany administration at that time = nazi. nazis did the same thing in internal politics BEFORE they got power. THEY DIDNT USE VIOLENCE UNTIL THEY WERE POWERFUL THAN ANY OTHER POLITICAL GROUP. currently muslim organizations in europe are OPENLY declaring that they want to make all world an islam state, with sharia, and will kill anyone opposing them if necessary. YET they are not killing anyone, but recruiting people, increasing their numbers geometrically. see a similarity ?
Lol.. Nope, you fail really hard right here. People were killed. It wans't a war but mobs killed others who weren't supporting the revolution.
that happened TOWARDS THE END. this is you are failing to get, due to probably lack of your knowledge on historical subjects. SUCH FUNDAMENTALIST/HARDLINER GROUPS WAIT UNTIL THEY ARE POWERFUL THAN ANY OTHER GROUP to commit any violence.
Lol.. Then I guess it is a good thing they aren't in charge. But your accusation here doesn't mean I don't know anything, it means that I don't consider it to be a threat in the free world. And not, the Koran doesn't dictate any tax- it doesn't dictate minority populations. Your confusing things.
dont try to sell me what i lived with. i am a former muslim, or, 'made' muslim from birth. and yes, there is a tax, which is called jizyah, and all non muslims that are under sharia law are BOUND to pay it. they are not in charge yet, but they will be, if people around the world keep going willy nilly lighthearted like you. they werent even a political power in turkey 25 years ago. now they control the government. their islamist prime minister had scowled to israel prime minister just a day ago. all the while turkey being the
they serve stupid corporations' interests more than they serve justice in any form. what's appalling is, corporations are so stupid that they actually seek to hamper their own survivability and profits with out-of-hell-stupid lawsuits like this.
sc can be won through either macromanagement strategy or micromanagement. the longer the game takes, winning through microing becomes increasingly harder. IF, someone is still able to win through micro at late game against an opponent who has superior macro, there is probably nothing you can teach that person in regard to war theory.
what did ANY senior post appointee in the administrations of the last 30 years do to get to their post ? APART from being regulars of smoke filled rooms ?
please wake up. this person, is of our age and times. he doesnt belong to an age in which life was decided in smoke filled rooms on leather armchairs.
its not what he has done. its that he is of OUR generations, the tech affiliated generations, and he is of our rising internet/tech culture. thats what's important.
it would be utterly stupid, STUPID to assign a person to such posts, just because they have pulled some ceo stunts in some monolithic dinosaur companies. considering the fact that we are well into the tech age and the only thing we havent started automating&integrating being the way we shit in our wcs, and the fact that how badly the 'executive' understanding of the past 'hey its high finance & executive times !' era screwed up our global economy, doing as such would be even more stupid.
starcraft has been patched and refined so many times since 1998 that it is a near perfect example of balanced strategy which requires long term planning as well as short term planning, instant decisions and twitch.
there is no 'annihilation' mode in starcraft. you have to carefully craft your strategy.
The equasion exists period. You can't claim it does because the stronger will always rule the weak without some arbitrary protections that you probably enjoy right now. Without that superior reasoning, you would most likely be the bitch of the nearest guy who could harm you.
no it doesnt exist, period. you cant just make up conceptual innovations within your mind, and then try to apply them to nature. on this planet, your numbers and coverage as homo sapiens sapiens and even any other monkey added, falls far below what is the coverage and population of what species you call the trees. totally inert, physically inactive species goes far beyond your numbers and variety. the fact that you are able to cut down one doesnt matter, since if you fall in the ocean, it wont take seconds for you to get killed by a shark, or even a giant squid. and yea man size squids exist. leave that aside, your approach is not directly relevant.
regardless of what YOU THINK, again, there are NO laws in nature that says any species is superior to any other.
Umm... yea, if they won. They didn't because they weren't on the good side. Good will alway win over evil. This isn't because of some super power or anything it's because people who know they are right fight harder then people who know they are wrong. The Nazi'a knew they were wrong and towards the end of the war, most of them were attempting to make pacts with the allies to avoid punishment for their wrongs.
again, guy, you dont know zit about history. history is filled with examples of evil winning over good, per se. nazis didnt think they were wrong or something. most of them committed suicide, the ones which didnt negotiated their way out of the situation. they didnt make a confession or anything about their wrongness or anything else. you seem to be confusing nazi party with german people. you dont even know the difference between nazi, wehrmacht and german probably. do some reading.
But As I have explained before, the Nazi's never should have gone that far, it was not a matter of the time to act, it was a matter of failing to act. This is very important as we should have stepped in long before we did and if Europe would have stepped in and enforced the armistice from WWI, WWII would never have happened.
but why !! shouldnt you just have peacefully protested against rearmament ?! hm ? after all, they werent killing anyone at that point with those tanks and aircraft right ? good golly. are you conflicting the peaceful protesting ideals now ? my my.
Man you're really stretching aren't you. AS I already said, Iran was a justified fight too. And when they hunt you down and beat you, fight back. Fuck, why are you beating a dead horse and claiming I don't know anything?
thats because... ummm.. you dont know anything ?
no you really dont. there wasnt any fighting in iran. dont try to talk any bullshit on this one - the people who were able to escape iran escaped to turkey. we have first hand accounts of what happened there.
What? Most islamic countries allow you to be of different religions. You need to wake the hell up and look around. When they attempt to take those freedoms from you, deny that. If they turn violent, you are justified to respond with violence. What the hell is so hard to understand about that? Are you actually suggesting that we should kill them all now and let god sort it out or something? You don't sound like you're standing for freedom of religion or freedom of speech unless they agree with you.
again, another example of why i told you are talking on stuff you dont know shit about.
read koran. you havent. you dont know zit about it. koran allows other religions ONLY if they are in small minority, accept the lower class treatment, AND PAY SPECIAL RELIGION TAX PER PERSON. there is an explicit order against christians and jews,
Does anyone know of other great open source games that are truly 'open?'"
is this question, appended to the end of the whole paragraph solely pimping a game, really necessary ? it seems as eloquent and delicate as a butterfly that's landed on a horse's dick. if you gonna pimp the game, just pimp it.
as a web developer, im still having to deal with IE6 to ensure cross browser compatibility, and a little lost on the versioning now. how many shitface versions of ie out there that i have to test for x browser compatibility as of now ? 3 ? 5 ? 234,643 ? will it ever end ?
these people are the kind of people who deserve the thick stick treatment. get a load of that - some ALIEN visitor, definitely of SUPERIOR technology may be coming to earth. and, you order the planes to 'shoot them down' to 'clear the issue'. EVEN if its a 1% probability, imagine shooting down of the first visiting ship of a technologically superior race. If their laws and understanding is anything like our shitface civilization, that deserves a planetary whacking in response.
that kind of morons. trademark of britain since thatcher (tm).
eu is trying to mitigate copyrights and patents, yet us isnt. microsoft is a us corp. they are being whacked down in europe, because in us they dont get the serving they deserve.
Sure their is. It survival of the fittest. We are dominant over the other animals therefor we are supreme. When Ants or bunny rabbits become dominate over us, they will be supreme. It won't matter is we like it or not.
again, its your opinion. its not anything that is written in any natural laws. you are perceiving that you are superior, and therefore you are more valuable. such an equation does not exist. its created only in your social groupthink.
Sure their is. It survival of the fittest. We are dominant over the other animals therefor we are supreme. When Ants or bunny rabbits become dominate over us, they will be supreme. It won't matter is we like it or not.
with the above blockquote, you can as well say that if nazis won ww2, they had every right to say that they were superior to anyone else, because they were the fittest, they won, and they became dominant over other animals in their pack.
and before you err - for anything to become a rule of nature, it has to be valid in all respects, and everywhere. you cant create divisions such as 'monkey' 'carrot' 'human' 'firefly' and apply different rules. if stronger and more fit rules, they have to rule in every aspect of existence. not only interspecies, but intraspecies. just as laws of physics apply to everything indiscriminately. anything else is human groupthink.
Islamist also didn't remain peaceful in Iran in 1979 now did they? That answer to that is no so there is no reason to remain peaceful in return. That falls completely in line with my statement too, you don't resort to violents unless it is to stop them from using violence on a human. Your entire 1979 Iran is a non starter. You need to drop it because it doesn't fit the mold you are attempting to make it fit. There was a violent revolution in Iran in 1979, there wasn't a peaceful movement making a case that others decided to go along with.
they did. as much as they do now in europe, middle east, america. to the extent that social democrats, even communists have erred in believing that islamists actually wanted a democratic republic with freedom of thought. when they thought free elections were going to be held after it was done, they have been beaten down and arrested. you dont know much about that part of history do you. and you started an argument saying that another argument was a nonstarter on a nonstarter, even lack of information. dont do that.
Sure there is. It's called freedom of expression and freedom of religion. I'm as free as you are as a human. The US has in ingrained in it's constitution, the UN has it ingrained on their charter of human rights (atheism is actually a protected religion). But you can't use your freedoms to take away someone else freedoms. When you do, they stand in protest, when you resort to violence, they retaliate with violence. If you don't initiate violence in your efforts to oppress them, they don't have a legitimate reason to become violent. Like I said, that started the down fall of the KKK
you are recognizing that freedom of expression and freedom of religion. islamists DO NOT. there is no such thing as freedom of expression or religion in islam. if you havent read koran, it means you dont know jack shit about it.islamists openly state that they do not approve freedom of expression, or religion, and they want to end it when they can. even the ones living in middle of netherlands are saying that, despite all the freedoms they are being given, and the freedoms being given to people in netherlands would put any freedoms you think you have in u.s. to tears.
thats the way it is. they are a group that DO NOT approve or accept freedom. and they openly declare that they will end it.
now explain, how logical is it to allow these people to keep going like this.
Killing Anyone, jews, it doesn't fucking matter. You see, they were killing people and using violence and those people di
nay, your arguments for the priviledged editorials do not hold. wikipedia's success IS people oriented, contributive, nonmitigated or edited information. thats the way it thrived with.
its absurd to propose such a radical change of system, just to prevent someone from seeing 'xyz is a fag' on the site, in fear of being driven away.
Slashdot Mirror
iran doesnt invade any country actively, but they invade them through the religious terorrist organizations they fund. hezbollah, hamas, ibda-c, numerous groups trying to invade pakistan, afghanistan are just a few.
much more annoying and dangerous.
if you are not able to discern about an important satire making a point regarding misconceptions and bullsh@t going on in the society about video gaming ?
special effects ? CGI ? scenery ? on-site shots ?
no. majority of film budgets are given to stars, who live lavishly off those pay. just read below article, and that's just one google search :
http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/22/actors-hollywood-movies-biz-media-cx_lr_0722actors.html
see, in total, only the 'leading' people have walked away with $487 mn in pay last year. thats half a billion. half a billion is paid to actors.
its not the acting, its not the effort. noone is getting a plastic surgery or a skin recoloring or transplant or anything to act. its just a race of prestige in between actors and actresses. i want more pay. why ? because a certain someone i know and compete with got such a pay and i want more ...
no sir. noone can justify what shit we are being put through while paying $20 a dvd, while an actor gets $80 mn for a few movies.
and i will try to make my close circle give up nokia too. how about that ?
you stand corrected.
There are no laws of nature outside of mans conceptual innovations to begin with. There simply isn't. Your entire premise is founded in that very same realm. The population size doesn't matter either, it's not about how may there are, it's about who can do what and what with their surroundings. We can anthropomorphism anything we want but the simple fact remains that we rule.
f=ma is a law. observable, solid, valid laws for our locale of the universe. 'superiority' is a human perceptional invention.
BTW, you do realize that people go swimming in the ocean all the damn time without being killed by Sharks or Giant Squids. You should also realize that people take tools into the ocean and hunt sharks and squids all the time too. That's what makes Humans superior.
3/4 of your planet is water. if you wander into a desert or mountain, you will probably come back without getting attacked by wolves. what matters is, what happens when you chance up with one.
No, History is filled full of examples of evil winning battles but in the end, good always prevails. And yes, Nazis did attempt to negotiate with allies about a surrender that didn't involve them getting killed. Much of that was used as evidence of wrong doings in trials after the war. But go ahead and think you are UBER COOL and Super smart- it's really getting you somewhere here.
again you dont know about history, yet you are speaking with surety. nazis never negotiated with anyone. WEHRMACHT did. this might be a good time for you to do a search about wehrmacht and read up. especially what it meant in between 1918-1945.
Jesus Chirst dude, are you fucking stupid? We just went through this, The german's used violence first so violence in return was justified. Christ, what is so hard to understand about that? You don't go around harming and killing people unless they are doing it to you. If everyone believed that, we wouldn't have half of the problems we have now. And you wouldn't need to be so scared of the evil moooslims.
you are choosing not to get it.
germans DIDNT USE ANY MILITARY FORCE UNTIL THEY WERE FAR SUPERIOR THAN ANY ARMY THAT COULD OPPOSE THEM. get this in your head. germany administration at that time = nazi. nazis did the same thing in internal politics BEFORE they got power. THEY DIDNT USE VIOLENCE UNTIL THEY WERE POWERFUL THAN ANY OTHER POLITICAL GROUP. currently muslim organizations in europe are OPENLY declaring that they want to make all world an islam state, with sharia, and will kill anyone opposing them if necessary. YET they are not killing anyone, but recruiting people, increasing their numbers geometrically. see a similarity ?
Lol.. Nope, you fail really hard right here. People were killed. It wans't a war but mobs killed others who weren't supporting the revolution.
that happened TOWARDS THE END. this is you are failing to get, due to probably lack of your knowledge on historical subjects. SUCH FUNDAMENTALIST/HARDLINER GROUPS WAIT UNTIL THEY ARE POWERFUL THAN ANY OTHER GROUP to commit any violence.
Lol.. Then I guess it is a good thing they aren't in charge. But your accusation here doesn't mean I don't know anything, it means that I don't consider it to be a threat in the free world. And not, the Koran doesn't dictate any tax- it doesn't dictate minority populations. Your confusing things.
dont try to sell me what i lived with. i am a former muslim, or, 'made' muslim from birth. and yes, there is a tax, which is called jizyah, and all non muslims that are under sharia law are BOUND to pay it. they are not in charge yet, but they will be, if people around the world keep going willy nilly lighthearted like you. they werent even a political power in turkey 25 years ago. now they control the government. their islamist prime minister had scowled to israel prime minister just a day ago. all the while turkey being the
they serve stupid corporations' interests more than they serve justice in any form. what's appalling is, corporations are so stupid that they actually seek to hamper their own survivability and profits with out-of-hell-stupid lawsuits like this.
luckily that kind of shit wont fly in europe.
since thai tourism will be getting a nose dive, others can benefit. serves them right for being jackasses about freedom of speech.
get a load of that :
Such is the life of HD 80606b, a gas giant planet four times the mass of Jupiter that orbits a star 190 light years from Earth.
and we think jupiter is huge. this thing is FOUR times the mass.
sc can be won through either macromanagement strategy or micromanagement. the longer the game takes, winning through microing becomes increasingly harder. IF, someone is still able to win through micro at late game against an opponent who has superior macro, there is probably nothing you can teach that person in regard to war theory.
a sensible politician in UK ? i wouldnt expect to see that after last 8 years !
what did ANY senior post appointee in the administrations of the last 30 years do to get to their post ? APART from being regulars of smoke filled rooms ?
please wake up. this person, is of our age and times. he doesnt belong to an age in which life was decided in smoke filled rooms on leather armchairs.
its not what he has done. its that he is of OUR generations, the tech affiliated generations, and he is of our rising internet/tech culture. thats what's important.
it would be utterly stupid, STUPID to assign a person to such posts, just because they have pulled some ceo stunts in some monolithic dinosaur companies. considering the fact that we are well into the tech age and the only thing we havent started automating&integrating being the way we shit in our wcs, and the fact that how badly the 'executive' understanding of the past 'hey its high finance & executive times !' era screwed up our global economy, doing as such would be even more stupid.
open source initiatives through sun ceo, ex yahoo exec for admn. post, symantec exec for ceo .... totally investing in the upcoming tech age.
u.s. is going to shake up and lead again after all. just at the time we thought it was going down the drain. amazing.
starcraft has been patched and refined so many times since 1998 that it is a near perfect example of balanced strategy which requires long term planning as well as short term planning, instant decisions and twitch.
there is no 'annihilation' mode in starcraft. you have to carefully craft your strategy.
The equasion exists period. You can't claim it does because the stronger will always rule the weak without some arbitrary protections that you probably enjoy right now. Without that superior reasoning, you would most likely be the bitch of the nearest guy who could harm you.
no it doesnt exist, period. you cant just make up conceptual innovations within your mind, and then try to apply them to nature. on this planet, your numbers and coverage as homo sapiens sapiens and even any other monkey added, falls far below what is the coverage and population of what species you call the trees. totally inert, physically inactive species goes far beyond your numbers and variety. the fact that you are able to cut down one doesnt matter, since if you fall in the ocean, it wont take seconds for you to get killed by a shark, or even a giant squid. and yea man size squids exist. leave that aside, your approach is not directly relevant.
regardless of what YOU THINK, again, there are NO laws in nature that says any species is superior to any other.
Umm... yea, if they won. They didn't because they weren't on the good side. Good will alway win over evil. This isn't because of some super power or anything it's because people who know they are right fight harder then people who know they are wrong. The Nazi'a knew they were wrong and towards the end of the war, most of them were attempting to make pacts with the allies to avoid punishment for their wrongs.
again, guy, you dont know zit about history. history is filled with examples of evil winning over good, per se. nazis didnt think they were wrong or something. most of them committed suicide, the ones which didnt negotiated their way out of the situation. they didnt make a confession or anything about their wrongness or anything else. you seem to be confusing nazi party with german people. you dont even know the difference between nazi, wehrmacht and german probably. do some reading.
But As I have explained before, the Nazi's never should have gone that far, it was not a matter of the time to act, it was a matter of failing to act. This is very important as we should have stepped in long before we did and if Europe would have stepped in and enforced the armistice from WWI, WWII would never have happened.
but why !! shouldnt you just have peacefully protested against rearmament ?! hm ? after all, they werent killing anyone at that point with those tanks and aircraft right ? good golly. are you conflicting the peaceful protesting ideals now ? my my.
Man you're really stretching aren't you. AS I already said, Iran was a justified fight too. And when they hunt you down and beat you, fight back. Fuck, why are you beating a dead horse and claiming I don't know anything?
thats because ... ummm .. you dont know anything ?
no you really dont. there wasnt any fighting in iran. dont try to talk any bullshit on this one - the people who were able to escape iran escaped to turkey. we have first hand accounts of what happened there.
What? Most islamic countries allow you to be of different religions. You need to wake the hell up and look around. When they attempt to take those freedoms from you, deny that. If they turn violent, you are justified to respond with violence. What the hell is so hard to understand about that? Are you actually suggesting that we should kill them all now and let god sort it out or something? You don't sound like you're standing for freedom of religion or freedom of speech unless they agree with you.
again, another example of why i told you are talking on stuff you dont know shit about.
read koran. you havent. you dont know zit about it. koran allows other religions ONLY if they are in small minority, accept the lower class treatment, AND PAY SPECIAL RELIGION TAX PER PERSON. there is an explicit order against christians and jews,
Does anyone know of other great open source games that are truly 'open?'"
is this question, appended to the end of the whole paragraph solely pimping a game, really necessary ? it seems as eloquent and delicate as a butterfly that's landed on a horse's dick. if you gonna pimp the game, just pimp it.
Archduke of Krakton has given me license to prey on this sector's shipping.
* subliminal message - you should continue your manned space program * * its good for you *
that's why you havent lost any of your individual freedoms in the last 8 years. oh wait ...
as a web developer, im still having to deal with IE6 to ensure cross browser compatibility, and a little lost on the versioning now. how many shitface versions of ie out there that i have to test for x browser compatibility as of now ? 3 ? 5 ? 234,643 ? will it ever end ?
these people are the kind of people who deserve the thick stick treatment. get a load of that - some ALIEN visitor, definitely of SUPERIOR technology may be coming to earth. and, you order the planes to 'shoot them down' to 'clear the issue'. EVEN if its a 1% probability, imagine shooting down of the first visiting ship of a technologically superior race. If their laws and understanding is anything like our shitface civilization, that deserves a planetary whacking in response.
that kind of morons. trademark of britain since thatcher (tm).
eu is trying to mitigate copyrights and patents, yet us isnt. microsoft is a us corp. they are being whacked down in europe, because in us they dont get the serving they deserve.
well, if the party has a track record of using force against others, and moreover they seem to be continuing that practice, we should.
Sure their is. It survival of the fittest. We are dominant over the other animals therefor we are supreme. When Ants or bunny rabbits become dominate over us, they will be supreme. It won't matter is we like it or not.
again, its your opinion. its not anything that is written in any natural laws. you are perceiving that you are superior, and therefore you are more valuable. such an equation does not exist. its created only in your social groupthink.
Sure their is. It survival of the fittest. We are dominant over the other animals therefor we are supreme. When Ants or bunny rabbits become dominate over us, they will be supreme. It won't matter is we like it or not.
with the above blockquote, you can as well say that if nazis won ww2, they had every right to say that they were superior to anyone else, because they were the fittest, they won, and they became dominant over other animals in their pack.
and before you err - for anything to become a rule of nature, it has to be valid in all respects, and everywhere. you cant create divisions such as 'monkey' 'carrot' 'human' 'firefly' and apply different rules. if stronger and more fit rules, they have to rule in every aspect of existence. not only interspecies, but intraspecies. just as laws of physics apply to everything indiscriminately. anything else is human groupthink.
Islamist also didn't remain peaceful in Iran in 1979 now did they? That answer to that is no so there is no reason to remain peaceful in return. That falls completely in line with my statement too, you don't resort to violents unless it is to stop them from using violence on a human. Your entire 1979 Iran is a non starter. You need to drop it because it doesn't fit the mold you are attempting to make it fit. There was a violent revolution in Iran in 1979, there wasn't a peaceful movement making a case that others decided to go along with.
they did. as much as they do now in europe, middle east, america. to the extent that social democrats, even communists have erred in believing that islamists actually wanted a democratic republic with freedom of thought. when they thought free elections were going to be held after it was done, they have been beaten down and arrested. you dont know much about that part of history do you. and you started an argument saying that another argument was a nonstarter on a nonstarter, even lack of information. dont do that.
Sure there is. It's called freedom of expression and freedom of religion. I'm as free as you are as a human. The US has in ingrained in it's constitution, the UN has it ingrained on their charter of human rights (atheism is actually a protected religion). But you can't use your freedoms to take away someone else freedoms. When you do, they stand in protest, when you resort to violence, they retaliate with violence. If you don't initiate violence in your efforts to oppress them, they don't have a legitimate reason to become violent. Like I said, that started the down fall of the KKK
you are recognizing that freedom of expression and freedom of religion. islamists DO NOT. there is no such thing as freedom of expression or religion in islam. if you havent read koran, it means you dont know jack shit about it.islamists openly state that they do not approve freedom of expression, or religion, and they want to end it when they can. even the ones living in middle of netherlands are saying that, despite all the freedoms they are being given, and the freedoms being given to people in netherlands would put any freedoms you think you have in u.s. to tears.
thats the way it is. they are a group that DO NOT approve or accept freedom. and they openly declare that they will end it.
now explain, how logical is it to allow these people to keep going like this.
Killing Anyone, jews, it doesn't fucking matter. You see, they were killing people and using violence and those people di
nay, your arguments for the priviledged editorials do not hold. wikipedia's success IS people oriented, contributive, nonmitigated or edited information. thats the way it thrived with.
its absurd to propose such a radical change of system, just to prevent someone from seeing 'xyz is a fag' on the site, in fear of being driven away.
they are giving back a cut of the money they have crookedly acquired. what's the problem ? what goes around comes around.