Slashdot Mirror

See subject: Pure fact & unstoppable - APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* Less power/cpu/ram+ IO use vs. local DNS servers + addons w/ less security issues vs. DNS + routers. Less complex vs firewalls (needing layered filtering drivers - hosts don't + firewalls block less used IP addresses, hosts block more used host-domain names) complimenting 'em. Antivirus = reactive. Hosts = proactive, blocking infection BEFORE you get it. Gets its data from 10 reputable security community sites.

APK

P.S. - Hosts get you more speed (hardcodes + adblocks) & faster vs. addons, security (vs. bad sites/dns security issues), reliability (vs. downed/poisoned dns), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) vs. other "so-called -solutions'" w/ what you natively have. Unlike Adblock/UBlock/Ghostery, hosts != blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ... apk

APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* Less power/cpu/ram+ IO use vs. local DNS servers + addons w/ less security issues vs. DNS + routers. Less complex vs firewalls (needing layered filtering drivers - hosts don't + firewalls block less used IP addresses, hosts block more used host-domain names) complimenting 'em. Antivirus = reactive. Hosts = FAR more proactive, blocking infection BEFORE you get it. Gets its data from 10 reputable security community sites.

APK

P.S. - Hosts get you more speed (hardcodes + adblocks) & faster vs. addons, security (vs. bad sites/dns security issues), reliability (vs. downed/poisoned dns), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) vs. other "so-called -solutions'" w/ what you natively have. Unlike Adblock/UBlock/Ghostery, hosts != blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ... apk

APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* Less power/cpu/ram+ IO use vs. local DNS servers + addons w/ less security issues vs. DNS + routers. Less complex vs firewalls (needing layered filtering drivers - hosts don't + firewalls block less used IP addresses, hosts block more used host-domain names) complimenting 'em. Antivirus = reactive. Hosts = proactive, blocking infection BEFORE you get it. Gets its data from 10 reputable security community sites.

APK

P.S. - Hosts get you more speed (hardcodes + adblocks) & faster vs. addons, security (vs. bad sites/dns security issues), reliability (vs. downed/poisoned dns), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) vs. other "so-called -solutions'" w/ what you natively have. Unlike Adblock/UBlock/Ghostery, hosts != blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ... apk

APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* Less power/cpu/ram+ IO use vs. local DNS servers + addons w/ less security issues vs. DNS + routers. Less complex vs firewalls (needing layered filtering drivers - hosts don't + firewalls block less used IP addresses, hosts block more used host-domain names) complimenting 'em. Antivirus = reactive. Hosts = FAR more proactive, blocking infection BEFORE you get it. Gets its data from 10 reputable security community sites.

APK

P.S. - Hosts get you more speed (hardcodes + adblocks) & faster vs. addons, security (vs. bad sites/dns security issues), reliability (vs. downed/poisoned dns), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) vs. other "so-called -solutions'" w/ what you natively have. Unlike Adblock/UBlock/Ghostery, hosts != blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ... apk

APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* Less power/cpu/ram+ IO use vs. local DNS servers + addons w/ less security issues vs. DNS + routers. Less complex vs firewalls (needing layered filtering drivers - hosts don't + firewalls block less used IP addresses, hosts block more used host-domain names) complimenting 'em. Antivirus = reactive. Hosts = far more proactive, blocking infection BEFORE you get it. Gets its data from 10 reputable security community sites.

APK

P.S. - Hosts get you more speed (hardcodes + adblocks) & faster vs. addons, security (vs. bad sites/dns security issues), reliability (vs. downed/poisoned dns), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) vs. other "so-called -solutions'" w/ what you natively have. Unlike Adblock/UBlock/Ghostery, hosts != blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ... apk

APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* Less power/cpu/ram+ IO use vs. local DNS servers + addons w/ less security issues vs. DNS + routers. Less complex vs firewalls (needing layered filtering drivers - hosts don't + firewalls block less used IP addresses, hosts block more used host-domain names) complimenting 'em. Antivirus = reactive. Hosts = proactive, blocking infection BEFORE you get it. Gets its data from 10 reputable security community sites.

APK

P.S. - Hosts get you more speed (hardcodes + adblocks) & faster vs. addons, security (vs. bad sites/dns security issues), reliability (vs. downed/poisoned dns), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) vs. other "so-called -solutions'" w/ what you natively have. Unlike Adblock/UBlock/Ghostery, hosts != blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ... apk

Found this on reddit:

I've seen theres a lot of speculation on whether the observed network connections from Windows 10 with privacy options on are actually spying or not, and figured some actual evidence would be in order.

Anyone can recreate this for themselves:

                Fresh install of Windows 10.
                Set all privacy options to off, disable cortana, disable web search
                Ensure all updates are done. Close all programs.
                Install Fiddler, and enable HTTPS sniffing. (If you use wireshark, you wont be able to view the HTTPS)
                Press stream in fiddler.
                Click the windows search bar, type any letter, watch the HTTPS session to bing.com appear.

Im still trying to figure out exactly what it is that it is transmitting, but its for sure sending a user-agent string that identifies itself as Cortana.

Some observed behaviors:

                Clicking on a link from an application (in this case, a download link from within Fiddler) submits the URL you are visiting to urs.microsoft.com.
                Opening applications-- even with SmartScreen disabled-- opens sessions to apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com and, among other things, submits the hash of the application. EDIT: Apparently you must also disable smartscreen in edge. Even so, it will initiate a connection to w.apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com
                Typing anything into the search bar will, regardless of settings, initiate an HTTPS session to www.bing.com. It will transmit a cookie, though so far I have not seen anything in there that looks like keystroke monitoring, as the only thing that appears to change between attempts is an HV section of the cookie. It appears to be downloading javascript, and submitting identifying data (screen resolution, install date, SID). The URL it uses is https://www.bing.com/manifest/... [bing.com]
                Opening the settings app and going into account options sometimes opens a session to public-family.api.account.microsoft.com:443. I suppose this would be expected.

Found this on reddit:

've seen theres a lot of speculation on whether the observed network connections from Windows 10 with privacy options on are actually spying or not, and figured some actual evidence would be in order.

Anyone can recreate this for themselves:

        Fresh install of Windows 10.

        Set all privacy options to off, disable cortana, disable web search

        Ensure all updates are done. Close all programs.

        Install Fiddler, and enable HTTPS sniffing. (If you use wireshark, you wont be able to view the HTTPS)

        Press stream in fiddler.

        Click the windows search bar, type any letter, watch the HTTPS session to bing.com appear.

Im still trying to figure out exactly what it is that it is transmitting, but its for sure sending a user-agent string that identifies itself as Cortana.

Some observed behaviors:

        Clicking on a link from an application (in this case, a download link from within Fiddler) submits the URL you are visiting to urs.microsoft.com.

        Opening applications-- even with SmartScreen disabled-- opens sessions to apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com and, among other things, submits the hash of the application. EDIT: Apparently you must also disable smartscreen in edge. Even so, it will initiate a connection to w.apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com

        Typing anything into the search bar will, regardless of settings, initiate an HTTPS session to www.bing.com. It will transmit a cookie, though so far I have not seen anything in there that looks like keystroke monitoring, as the only thing that appears to change between attempts is an HV section of the cookie. It appears to be downloading javascript, and submitting identifying data (screen resolution, install date, SID). The URL it uses is https://www.bing.com/manifest/...

        Opening the settings app and going into account options sometimes opens a session to public-family.api.account.microsoft.com:443. I suppose this would be expected.

Looks like I have some more firewall rules to add.

Found this on reddit:

've seen theres a lot of speculation on whether the observed network connections from Windows 10 with privacy options on are actually spying or not, and figured some actual evidence would be in order.

Anyone can recreate this for themselves:

        Fresh install of Windows 10.
        Set all privacy options to off, disable cortana, disable web search
        Ensure all updates are done. Close all programs.
        Install Fiddler, and enable HTTPS sniffing. (If you use wireshark, you wont be able to view the HTTPS)
        Press stream in fiddler.
        Click the windows search bar, type any letter, watch the HTTPS session to bing.com appear.

Im still trying to figure out exactly what it is that it is transmitting, but its for sure sending a user-agent string that identifies itself as Cortana.

Some observed behaviors:

        Clicking on a link from an application (in this case, a download link from within Fiddler) submits the URL you are visiting to urs.microsoft.com.
        Opening applications-- even with SmartScreen disabled-- opens sessions to apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com and, among other things, submits the hash of the application. EDIT: Apparently you must also disable smartscreen in edge. Even so, it will initiate a connection to w.apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com
        Typing anything into the search bar will, regardless of settings, initiate an HTTPS session to www.bing.com. It will transmit a cookie, though so far I have not seen anything in there that looks like keystroke monitoring, as the only thing that appears to change between attempts is an HV section of the cookie. It appears to be downloading javascript, and submitting identifying data (screen resolution, install date, SID). The URL it uses is https://www.bing.com/manifest/...
        Opening the settings app and going into account options sometimes opens a session to public-family.api.account.microsoft.com:443. I suppose this would be expected.

Opera 12.18 (64-bit too) http://www.bing.com/search?q=o...

* Enjoy!

APK

P.S.=> Has some security update in it iirc... apk

http://www.bing.com/search?q=r...
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://thestack.com/root-comma...
http://thestack.com/zyxeltech-...
http://threatpost.com/12-milli...
http://threatpost.com/dns-base...
http://threatpost.com/internet...
http://voices.washingtonpost.c...
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/s...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/+...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/2...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/5...
http://tools.cisco.com/securit...
http://tools.cisco.com/securit...
http://tools.cisco.com/securit...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

UNIX HAS A PROBLEM IN 2038 - John Titor http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

A sampling of what's available http://www.efg2.com/Lab/Librar...

* & that's only SOME of what's out there built for Delphi to use in statistics...

APK

P.S.=> Here's far more -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=d...

http://www.bing.com/search?q=d...

* See subject, that link & eat your words...YOURS may not go down but then, NOBODY USES IT TO GIVE A SUFFICIENT LOAD TO MAKE IT GO DOWN either, lol!

(Kaminsky flaw redirect poisoning can happen to you, & IF you try fix it using TCP vs. UDP, you DOUBLE YOUR OVERHEADS, making DNS even MORE INEFFICIENT - patching it can f'up MX records iirc as well, so you're beaten @ every SINGLE turn... DNS amp attacks make it even MORESO!)

APK

P.S.=> It's always just (& you KNOW I've just GOTTA say it now don't you? Ah, but of COURSE you do) "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" making a do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" LIMITED MENIAL in Ash-Fox EAT HIS WORDS... lol!

... apk

Yeah, because as we all know back doors don't exist in Cisco routers... oh wait

Well, at least their Linksys products have never been exploited... oh darn

Hmm, I am sure that their Call Manager has never been... damn it!

Between the security guides I wrote based on the highly esteemed CIS Tool (which took fixes from me no less) http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

Along with the speed, security, reliability, & anonymity gaining APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.start64.com/index.p...

Which the guide also uses (by "yours truly", The "LORD OF HOSTS" so-to-speak) that does far more for all of the above benefits for FAR less than browser addons, DNS servers installed locally (fixing its security issues by avoiding it resolving faster locally w/ hosts cached in RAM + protecting you vs. current threats of all kinds), even firewall programs (which need layered on drivers , hosts don't & they operate on IP addresses in Windows - modern threats use host-domain names 99% of the time) & even antivirus programs (that wait till your infected to be effective, hosts block that from happening at all in the 1st place)?

It ALL works to make my subject line above truth & fact!

* :)

(To the tune of users of my guides & hosts program NEVER being infected @ all, yet going FASTER (which other "so-called security 'solutions'" certainly cannot claim or nearly as well on all fronts I noted...))

APK

P.S.=> "It's not EASY being 'world-class'" like me I tell ya, lol, & to my naysayer/detractors who never prove me wrong here (or the dolts @ arstechnica especially whom I floored in 2003 @ Windows IT Pro Magazine outside their private playpen @ ars)? YOU WISH YOU WERE ME (& you know it)... apk

Between the security guides I wrote based on the highly esteemed CIS Tool (which took fixes from me no less) http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

Along with the speed, security, reliability, & anonymity gaining APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.start64.com/index.p...

Which the guide also uses (by "yours truly", The "LORD OF HOSTS" so-to-speak) that does far more for all of the above benefits for FAR less than browser addons, DNS servers installed locally, even firewall programs (which need layered on drivers (fixing its security issues by avoiding it resolving faster locally w/ hosts cached in RAM + protecting you vs. current threats of all kinds), hosts don't & they operate on IP addresses in Windows - modern threats use host-domain names 99% of the time) & even antivirus programs (that wait till your infected to be effective, hosts block that from happening at all in the 1st place)?

It ALL works to make my subject line above truth & fact!

* :)

(To the tune of users of my guides & hosts program NEVER being infected @ all, yet going FASTER (which other "so-called security 'solutions'" certainly cannot claim or nearly as well on all fronts I noted...))

APK

P.S.=> "It's not EASY being 'world-class'" like me I tell ya, lol, & to my naysayer/detractors who never prove me wrong here (or the dolts @ arstechnica especially whom I floored in 2003 @ Windows IT Pro Magazine outside their private playpen @ ars)? YOU WISH YOU WERE ME (& you know it)... apk

It's funny how everyone seems to "know" that benefit tourism exists, well by everyone I mean those who read The Daily Mail/Express/Telegraph, but the actual evidence seems to be harder to find.

Maybe my experience is atypical but everyone I'm acquainted with who is from elsewhere in Europe is either a student or has a job and everyone I know on benefits was born here.

"Android is vastly more secure than Windows was" - by Shawn Willden (2914343) on Friday January 22, 2016 @12:06AM (#51348617)

Vastly, eh? Listen KID (& to me you are, your job title means squat boy): See subject & the results of this search on Google:

http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

Now, let me cite MY credentials like you did (in some "appeal to authority" illogic logic): I'm the guy who wrote that & I've been @ the art & science of computing coming up from techie->network admin->programmer/analyst->software-engineer for 24++ yrs. professionally since 1994 & programming + setting up these machines from 1982 onward (from mainframes, to midranges, to client-server designs) & in that timeframe, I'd wager YOU WERE STILL IN DIAPERS when I was making all the trade rags in it & working in the Fortune 100/500!

As far as securing systems? Same deal: Those guides of mine, yes for Windows, use the HIGHLY ESTEEMED CIS Tool - & guess what again? They TOOK FIXES & SUGGESTIONS FROM ME on how to do it on several accounts that make the system far more secure AND ones to avoid they suggested that *might* cause issues also.

Lastly & most importantly: That quote of yours I cited is why I am writing this - Windows can be as secure as ANY OS OUT THERE once it's properly security-hardened (none of them are "out-of-the-box").

To have the SHEER NERVE to say what you did is mind-boggling... why?

HELL - LOOK @ ALL THE VULNERABILITIES & PROBLEMS ANDROID HAS HAD SINCE IT'S VERY PUBLIC RELEASE & INCEPTION!

(Tons of bugs - so "tell us another one", ok? For Pete's sake - the interface/front-end is created in a JAVA variant that has code Oracle's SUED YOU FOR proving it is... & we all KNOW the security issues inherent in it that pop up constantly for years now... & don't try to say "but it's the kernel" well, ANDROID is made up of FAR MORE than a mere kernel only (but this news proves it too has issues as well))

ADDENDUM FACT:

Ah, so "the best you got" pr puppet with sockpuppets and "allies" advertisers was a DOWNMOD that's unjustifiable last time I posted this? Proof's in the pudding -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

(YOU ARE FAILING, boy... lol, & you KNOW it!)

See you here too -> http://apple.slashdot.org/comm...

(Going to "downmod & run" on THAT post of mine too, Google pr spinboy puppet? Yes I wager!)

APK

P.S.=> Android's had SO MANY BUGS & SECURITY ISSUES since it's release it's not even funny, & you said that? Please... lol!

... apk

"Android is vastly more secure than Windows was" - by Shawn Willden (2914343) on Friday January 22, 2016 @12:06AM (#51348617)

Vastly, eh? Listen KID (& to me you are, your job title means squat boy): See subject & the results of this search on Google:

http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

Now, let me cite MY credentials like you did (in some "appeal to authority" illogic logic): I'm the guy who wrote that & I've been @ the art & science of computing coming up from techie->network admin->programmer/analyst->software-engineer for 24++ yrs. professionally since 1994 & programming + setting up these machines from 1982 onward (from mainframes, to midranges, to client-server designs) & in that timeframe, I'd wager YOU WERE STILL IN DIAPERS when I was making all the trade rags in it & working in the Fortune 100/500!

As far as securing systems? Same deal: Those guides of mine, yes for Windows, use the HIGHLY ESTEEMED CIS Tool - & guess what again? They TOOK FIXES & SUGGESTIONS FROM ME on how to do it on several accounts that make the system far more secure AND ones to avoid they suggested that *might* cause issues also.

Lastly & most importantly: That quote of yours I cited is why I am writing this - Windows can be as secure as ANY OS OUT THERE once it's properly security-hardened (none of them are "out-of-the-box").

To have the SHEER NERVE to say what you did is mind-boggling... why?

HELL - LOOK @ ALL THE VULNERABILITIES & PROBLEMS ANDROID HAS HAD SINCE IT'S VERY PUBLIC RELEASE & INCEPTION!

(Tons of bugs - so "tell us another one", ok? For Pete's sake - the interface/front-end is created in a JAVA variant that has code Oracle's SUED YOU FOR proving it is... & we all KNOW the security issues inherent in it that pop up constantly for years now... & don't try to say "but it's the kernel" well, ANDROID is made up of FAR MORE than a mere kernel only (but this news proves it too has issues as well))

APK

P.S.=> Android's had SO MANY BUGS & SECURITY ISSUES since it's release it's not even funny, & you said that? Please... lol!

... apk

satya nadella is that u

I googled "is google a verb" and it says yes:
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd...

Then I bung it:
http://www.bing.com/search?q=i...

So if even bing agrees that google is a verb, I guess that over rules "anonymous coward who can't capitalize for shit"

Where have you been?
https://www.bing.com/search?q=...

http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
http://thestack.com/root-comma...
http://thestack.com/zyxeltech-...
http://threatpost.com/12-milli...
http://threatpost.com/dns-base...
http://threatpost.com/internet...
http://tools.cisco.com/securit...
http://tools.cisco.com/securit...
http://tools.cisco.com/securit...
http://voices.washingtonpost.c...
http://www.bing.com/search?q=r...
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/s...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/+...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/2...
http://www.dshield.org/diary/5...

APK

P.S.=> So much for your faith in routers alone stupid (225 in total, 15 posts with 15 items each)... apk

See subject: I can easily put out @ least 50 instances of routers being hijacked in various ways (dns anyone, for one?) you sure you trust them?

* I don't - not alone...

"Layered-Security"/"Defense-In-Depth" IS the surest method & best thing we have going now...

APK

P.S.=> I use a stateful packet inspecting firewall router myself (& a filtering vs. threats DNS too) + software firewalls, hosts, AND OS + App patching (I practically wrote the book on this for Windows users -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=%... ) - it works... apk

Where the HELL do you see me trusting antivirus alone? Answer that & I'll cut you to shreds further... that is, if the links to my security guide earlier (#1/4 RIGHT OFF THE BAT HERE SHOOTING YOU DOWN whimp) didn't already on this note OR the link below as well!

* :)

(You're a fool - a cowardly little TROLLING FOOL that can't even identify himself to stand behind his words... lol!)

APK

P.S.=> I use antivirus programs (one resident, 2 antispyware as scanners only manually operated here & periodically scanned + updated daily IF possible) but again, I do NOT depend on them solely - I use "LAYERED SECURITY/DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH" & did well on guides I've written for it (paid for it in fact winning that money) -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=p... (See JANUARY 2008 Alexander/New York there)

Have YOU done the same OR BETTER, Mr. NO BALLS unidentifiable coward? ANYONE TRUSTING YOUR STUPID COWARDLY NO BALLS TROLL ASS IS A FOOL!... apk

Hardware ASA? Stupid to depend on THAT alone (especially when routers get bushwhacked like mad, DNS settings anyone??)

CISCO "hardware ASA" = bitten by typical JAVA bugs http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

(As is ALL of cisco's stuff lately & by FAR MORE than just that - want more evidence? Ask... & "ye shall receive" (loads of it)).

* By the way - I believe in LAYERED SECURITY (hosts are a big part of it) stupid -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=%... & you're talking to the guy that practically "wrote the book" on it...

(I just don't DEPEND ON IT SOLELY, but I use a hardware firewall solution in combination with OS side firewalls + security hardening galore with patching + antivirus & yes, hosts...)

APK

P.S.=> To be continued... apk

See subject: From here on down http://it.slashdot.org/comment... : who're you *trying* to fool other than yourself as to who the trolls are around here?

I WIPED ARSTECHNICA OFF THE MAP in 2003-2006 @ Windows IT Pro easily - Jeremy Reimer got his website removed by Shaw of Canada his ISP & hosting provider + he was put on a tracking ticket by them for email harassment... his "henchman" Jay Little said "I am an EXPERT on Exchange" which much to his dismay worked against him @ "The Memory Optimization Hoax" where I proved to them AND Dr. Mark Russinovich (former "co-worker" of mine @ Sunbelt where we retailed our wares there & he bitched I outsold his work, awww) that that technology unhalted & sped up frozen Exchange Servers USING MICROSOFT'S OWN DOCUMENTATION TO DO IT (clearmem.exe is the same tech, but not GUI, & I designed the 1st program of that nature in GUI no less).

Jay Little then trolled & stalked me to other websites where I annihilated him on ramdrives as well - he was banned + had his website @ CrystalTech removed by that hosting provider for libeling me.

Bad move bringing up the DOLTS of Arstechnica - all they can do is "gossip" like old biddies behind my back, BUT OUTSIDE THEIR "PRIVATE PLAYPEN"? The results are QUITE different, see above, lol...

Thor SCHMUCK?

LMAO!

Hey - Ask him how CA is doing caught in reprehensible ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES & he tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

You're the same kind of scum, but you're just as easy to dispatch with truth & facts.

APK

P.S.=> Still, what I said is the truth - I write wares that are "bulletproof & bugfree" (since none of you ever find any bugs in my program APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit

Computer Associates != a reputable source. They were caught in Accounting scandals http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... & HAD TO SELL THEIR GARBAGE PC SECURITY SUITE too!

HOWEVER: Before they did? They lowered the 'threat' level on that old simple app of mine to ZERO (no threat, as I passed all 21 of their removal questions with flying colors on it to be cleared as safe... lol!)

THOR SCHMUCK? LOL @ HIM - he had to eat my dust like the fat chump he is.

APK

P.S.=> It's a shame you're such "ne'er-do-wells" & aren't able to code apps that even the likes of Malwarebytes folks HOST & RECOMMEND for me... lol! apk

See subject: Show us me saying that - you can't, I never did. I said it doesn't come with Windows on the CD/DVD install media.

As far as the rest of your b.s.? Here's the truth:

Real "reputable" source there (not, criminals)

Computer Associates != a reputable source. They were caught in Accounting scandals http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... & HAD TO SELL THEIR GARBAGE PC SECURITY SUITE too!

HOWEVER: Before they did? They lowered the 'threat' level on that old simple app of mine to ZERO (no threat, as I passed all 21 of their removal questions with flying colors on it to be cleared as safe... lol!)

THOR SCHMUCK? LOL @ HIM - he had to eat my dust like the fat chump he is.

APK

P.S.=> It's a shame you're such "ne'er-do-wells" & aren't able to code apps that even the likes of Malwarebytes folks HOST & RECOMMEND for me... lol! apk

Computer Associates != a reputable source. They were caught in Accounting scandals http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... & HAD TO SELL THEIR GARBAGE PC SECURITY SUITE too!

HOWEVER: Before they did? They lowered the 'threat' level on that old simple app of mine to ZERO (no threat, as I passed all 21 of their removal questions with flying colors on it to be cleared as safe... lol!)

THOR SCHMUCK? LOL @ HIM - he had to eat my dust like the fat chump he is.

APK

P.S.=> It's a shame you're such "ne'er-do-wells" & aren't able to code apps that even the likes of Malwarebytes folks HOST & RECOMMEND for me... lol! apk

Computer Associates != a reputable source. They were caught in Accounting scandals http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... & HAD TO SELL THEIR GARBAGE PC SECURITY SUITE too!

APK

P.S.=> It's a shame you're such "ne'er-do-wells" & aren't able to code apps that even the likes of Malwarebytes folks HOST & RECOMMEND for me... lol! apk

Shaw his ISP in Canada put him on a tracking ticket for email harassment too

I find that claim kind of funny considering that was the primary reason given for you getting booted from Ars, you were caught spamming people from someone's email address, and were reported to your ISP RoadRunner. Perhaps someone should let Shaw know that very likely it was you doing the harassment and not them.

* I can't help it that I am SUPERIOR to all of you "arseholes" @ arstechnica (home of the troll + underachiever online, lol)...

I haven't yet seen evidence you are superior to slime mold.

Cybordeath? That's not I, sorry... I had no need to use other identities other than myself...

Yeah right, you were outted saying me in that thread, that they were insulting you while you posted as Cybordeath.

Ask THOR SCHMUCK how Computer Associates PC suite is doing? LOL, sold off for the garbage it is AFTER CA was caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=c... [bing.com]

So, he made more money off of his work than you do...amazing...

Russinovich & I both sold wares @ the same time thru the same employer (sunbelt) which is why I used quotes around it.

LOL, bullshit - I have the email to this VERY DAY of where CrystalTech booted Little & Reimer had to go serve up his bullshit playpen site off his own servers (after being booted by his hosting provider then). Shaw his ISP in Canada put him on a tracking ticket for email harassment too (which he was caught doing along with posting edited photos of myself on his servers, hence his "bootage", lol).

* I can't help it that I am SUPERIOR to all of you "arseholes" @ arstechnica (home of the troll + underachiever online, lol)...

Cybordeath? That's not I, sorry... I had no need to use other identities other than myself...

FUNNIEST ONE?? Catching God & MWNH (man with no head) using the SAME EMAIL on both accounts, lol... can you say "sockpuppets & trolls" over @ Ars?

I can... lol, with proof of it right there. LOL, losers...

Ask THOR SCHMUCK how Computer Associates PC suite is doing? LOL, sold off for the garbage it is AFTER CA was caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

CA falsely accused me of a ware being malware & removed the threat level (reduced to zero threat in the end) on my passing all 21 of their then questions for removal (This was upon the advice of an attorney John Lowe of Hiscock & Barclay in a conversation with him regarding it on the telephone that I take their test for removal).

So, I did so, & I passed the 21 questions, & the "alleged threat" was downrated, BUT, should have been removed totally: It wasn't.

APK

P.S.=> You're worthless & WEAK - & you KNOW it (everyone online does, lol)... apk

See subject & -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* :)

(AZURE CLOUDS in fact...)

REPOSTED: vs. the dickless wallies (lol) that downmoderated me the 1st time -> http://politics.slashdot.org/c... who don't realize that I can post w/out typical ac limits and will just post it again, exhausting their puny effete vain 'weapon' in the abused downmod, lol... you fail, trolls - You'll ALWAYS FAIL vs. me!

APK

P.S.=> As usual? No disrespect intended in my "King Billy" subject (anything BUT disrespect in my use of that - I greatly admire the man) either... apk

See subject & -> http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

* :)

(AZURE CLOUDS in fact...)

APK

P.S.=> As usual? No disrespect intended in my "King Billy" subject (anything BUT disrespect in my use of that - I greatly admire the man) either... apk

The black box situation ebbs and flows. The car diagnostics apparently used to require a specialized apparently rather large computer at a mechanic to run through paces or maybe just for the code, I'm not sure, but now a car parts store will hook a handheld device up to the car to read the codes stored in the car and give you a printout of their values and meaning for free. My brother-in-law said he could fix her Kia based on the codes and explanations, what he already knew and what he could read off the internet. She had to pay $160 bucks for two coils, but look what a search turned up. I even just put in kia coil and it offered the other search terms.

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

stop it

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk

"I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

62 sources of good repute show + /. users say otherwise:

Proven safe by 57 antivirus programs in its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

+

Same for the 32-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

&

Per VirScan its installer too -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

---

MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news... /.'ers say my work is good too:

"his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

"I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

"APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

"his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

---

You tried using Computer Associates antivirus that I overturned on false positives (1/8 over time) were caught in ACCOUNTING SCANDALS FRAUD http://www.bing.com/search?q=c...

Reputable source (not): They had to sell off their PC security suite too (crap too) LOWERING the 'threat level' on THAT program (not my hosts file engine) TO ZERO!

* YOU ARE WRONG ON EVERY ACCOUNT NOTED!

APK

P.S.=> Con't in part #3/5... apk