Domain: comcast.net
Stories and comments across the archive that link to comcast.net.
Comments · 730
-
Re:Illegal forgery and defense
Here's what Comcast has to say for themselves:
http://www.comcast.net/help/ -
Re:Comcast
On Apple's site they give you a very easy to find listing of what they do and don't support. Once I finally found Comcast's Terms of Use (I had to go to Google to find it), and it basically says Comcast will block anything pretty much if they just feel like it. When they're a monopoly in the area, I'd think that is pretty much a no-no when they're the providers of an important service like the Internet (past dial-up, which isn't a competitor in any way). I think that either a) Comcast should be required to open it's network to competitors, or b) play fairly as a common carrier and just transmit data as they supposedly sell it.
-
Re:One should hope so
If they had told me up front that they would be resetting peer-to-peer connections, I might be mad, but at least I'd know it up front and could choose to sign up with a service that doesn't do so.
While they don't explicitly say that they'll reset connections, their terms of service have always expressly forbidden running servers, and with the rise of P2P apps, that's been included as well. From their terms of service page:
Prohibited uses include, but are not limited to, using the Service, Customer Equipment, or the Comcast Equipment to:
xiv. run programs, equipment, or servers from the Premises that provide network content or any other services to anyone outside of your Premises LAN (Local Area Network), also commonly referred to as public services or servers. Examples of prohibited services and servers include, but are not limited to, e-mail, Web hosting, file sharing, and proxy services and servers; -
Comcast's AUP.
IANAL. Playing Devil's Advocate.
:)By signing up for and/or using the service, you agree to Comcast's AUP. According to Comcast's AUP, they can "terminate or suspend" your account if you fail to comply with the terms.
Instead of suspending or terminating the account, Comcast - recognizing the importance of the net and being connected - simply restricts / blocks / slows down the traffic associated with the excessive usage.
It is still possible to use BT, it will merely take longer.
Since the ports and protocol aren't vital to most people and the ways in which most people use the service (web, email, im), these actions only effect a minority of abusers who degrade the service for the majority.
I'm not sure how a class action lawsuit works (notice the "IANAL" at the start of this post? good), but if a jury is involved... the case faces an additional burden. Attempting to explain to the average person that BT traffic isn't just used to swap copyrighted material, but is also used to distribute Linux ISOs and WoW patches will only confirm in his mind that this is "geek shit" that he doesn't use and probably never will - and it may be responsible for his own slow connection at home.
From Comcast's AUP:
Prohibited Uses and Activitiesviii. restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or otherwise disrupt or cause a performance degradation, regardless of intent, purpose or knowledge, to the Service or any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) host, server, backbone network, node or service, or otherwise cause a performance degradation to any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) facilities used to deliver the Service;
-snip-
Network, Bandwidth, Data Storage and Other LimitationsComcast may provide versions of the Service with different speeds and bandwidth usage limitations, among other characteristics, subject to applicable Service plans. You shall ensure that your use of the Service does not restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or degrade any other user's use of the Service, nor represent (in the sole judgment of Comcast) an overly large burden on the network. In addition, you shall ensure that your use of the Service does not restrict, inhibit, interfere with, disrupt, degrade, or impede Comcast's ability to deliver and provide the Service and monitor the Service, backbone, network nodes, and/or other network services.
You further agree to comply with all Comcast network, bandwidth, and data storage and usage limitations. You shall ensure that your bandwidth consumption using the Service does not exceed the limitations that are now in effect or may be established in the future. If your use of the Service results in the consumption of bandwidth in excess of the applicable limitations, that is a violation of this Policy. In such cases, Comcast may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your Service account or request that you subscribe to a version of the Service with higher bandwidth usage limitations if you wish to continue to use the Service at higher bandwidth consumption levels.
-
information on Brad Brunnell......can be found here:
(financialwire.net via COMTEX News Network) -- October 1, 2007 (FinancialWire) The Acacia Technologies group of Acacia Research Corp. (NASDAQ: ACTG) has named Brad Brunell as senior vice president. Brunell joins Acacia from Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), where during his 16 year career he held a number of management positions, including general manager of intellectual property licensing.
I wonder why he left Microsoft? I wonder if he left Microsoft?Prior to his role as GM, Brunell served as a senior director, where he focused on digital media adoption. This included key deals with Time Warner (NYSE: TWX) and the Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS), leading the negotiating team for the settlement of the Intertrust patent litigation, and putting together the Content Guard ownership structure between Microsoft, Time Warner, and Thomson (NYSE: TOC). He also served on the board of Content Guard, a digital rights management patent licensing company.
In other words, this guy figures out how to make money from threatening lawsuits.His earlier career responsibilities as a group manager included managing business groups responsible for Microsoft's digital rights management technologies in the Windows client product group and business development for core audio/video technologies within the Windows platform.
But what did he really do for a living?
-
Re:that does seem possible according to the photos
I was on fire for at least 15 seconds, maybe more it's hard to tell with traumatic amnesia. I don't remember catching on fire, but I remember smothering foot high flames with my shirt sleeve for 15 seconds, then I remember pulling my hand out of a bucket of water that was across the room, so I can speak with some authority when I say if what he said happened, happened he'd look more like I did. I'm calling bullshit on that one, a slight scald from a overly warm battery sure, foot high flames stopped by "glossy" paper yeah right, sounds more like a bullshit entry to the Liability Lottery to me.
-
Re:Cons and wishful thinking
High power transmitter technology still relays on tubes.
This one http://home.comcast.net/~nwilson343/tubes/8974.html is 2 MW output power. -
Re:Ledgerlines
Here is the prefect example of the site that has google ads http://lorlov.home.comcast.net/ and it is still under $100 balance. Who wants to click on those ads in the first place. This is example why G00Gle 'looses' revenue
:) -
Re:Not very liberal minded of you
it's important to know exactly which garment is undergoing combustion in order to react in a correct and timely manner without unseemly haste or panic
I was on fire you insensitive clod, and without undue panic! -
Firefox crashes too!
My firefox I have running under Linux has been crashing every now and then over the last few months. It doesn't stall; the process just dies. I've rarely had it happen, but members of my family report it happening quite often. Also, it freezes on occassion as well, and I have to ps ax | grep firefox it.
See, firefox isn't as great as some people make it out to be. After encountering this site (which debunks many of the myths surrounding firefox's superiority), I decided to try Opera 9, which I quite like and now use on all my machines.
-
Re:I'm fed up with the anti-Opera crap here..."If security is what concerns you then, unless I'm very much mistaken, Firefox has had more vulnerabilities than Opera." - by WIAKywbfatw (307557) on Friday September 07, @06:47AM (#20505467) You're right as rain... read on:
Opera security advisories @ SECUNIA (0% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/10615/?task=advisories
FireFox security advisories @ SECUNIA (43% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12434/
IE 7 security advisories @ SECUNIA (56% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12366/
(As far as security related vulnerabilities remaining unpatched, Opera leads here (super-important in today's online world where security IS a concern))
APK
P.S.=> Here is some more "food for thought": "Opera is a great product from a great company. Pure and simple." - by WIAKywbfatw (307557) on Friday September 07, @06:47AM (#20505467) Agreed again, 110%, & here is why (additionally):
As far as speed comparisons? This is one that also extolls Opera's benefits over FF &/or IE here, & ON MULTIPLE OS PLATFORMS:
BROWSER SPEED COMPARISONS ON MANY TASKS & MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEM PLATFORMS:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
And, especially on Win32 OS', the most used PC platform/OS there is...
& here is yet another, very recent one. This one concentrates on Opera's speed superiority in terms of JavaScript parsing & interpretation processing only:
http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/
---
(& the best part is, Opera has ALL of the features a body can need, & it is FREE (as in BEER) WITHOUT using addons (though it has that via Opera widgets), & YET, Opera is LIGHTER ON MEMORY than FireFox &/or IE typically!)
You can check memory residency yourselves by loading FF, & Opera (& IE for Windows users) & test memory size occupancy via taskmgr.exe (or similar tools like Process Explorer) yourselves & see what I mean... I did so with FF 2.0.0.6, IE 7.x, & Opera 9.23.
---
Opera also passed the "ACID2" test, for standards compliance (it is not alone here, but is over IE & FF, & it was the 6th browser to do so):
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/12/1416222.shtml
A descending chronological order in which browsers (and authoring tools) passed Acid2, per a tip I got from by rh0 (member 1110203) here on /.:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2
Safari, Prince, Shiira, Konqueror, Opera, & iCab
(Firefox's Acid2 compliant branch has been merged into the trunk, thus, Firefox 3 will likely be Acid2 compliant, but currently FF & IE are not passers of this test.)
---
And, Opera had features (like tabbed browsing) that other browsers (major 2 others in IE/FF) copied from it:
FIREFOX MYTHS:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html
(Yes, Opera had tabbed browsing before IE &/or FF, & other features as well. Opera comes FULLY LOADED features-wise, with a built in email client, IRC client, RSS client, & more + yet eats less RAM than others, & addons only bloat IE &/or FF even more memory-occupancy-wise. (AND YES, Opera has addons as well in "opera widgets" (like .xpi addons for FF))... apk -
Re:Opera"It's my favourite low impact program." - by whitehatlurker (867714) on Friday September 07, @12:56PM (#20510101) Agreed, 110%, & here is why: Opera is an excellent multithreaded example of good, solid, secure, efficient & FAST code design!
APK
P.S.=> Some added "FYI" for those of you comparing FireFox/IE/Opera:
Opera security advisories @ SECUNIA (0% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/10615/?task=advisories
FireFox security advisories @ SECUNIA (43% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12434/
IE 7 security advisories @ SECUNIA (56% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12366/
(As far as security related vulnerabilities remaining unpatched, Opera leads here (super-important in today's online world where security IS a concern))
---
Also, as far as speed comparisons? This is one that also extolls Opera's benefits over FF &/or IE here, & ON MULTIPLE OS PLATFORMS:
BROWSER SPEED COMPARISONS ON MANY TASKS & MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEM PLATFORMS:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
And, especially on Win32 OS', the most used PC platform/OS there is...
& here is yet another, very recent one. This one concentrates on Opera's speed superiority in terms of JavaScript parsing & interpretation processing only:
http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/
---
(& the best part is, Opera has ALL of the features a body can need, & it is FREE (as in BEER) WITHOUT using addons (though it has that via Opera widgets), & YET, Opera is LIGHTER ON MEMORY than FireFox &/or IE typically!)
You can check memory residency yourselves by loading FF, & Opera (& IE for Windows users) & test memory size occupancy via taskmgr.exe (or similar tools like Process Explorer) yourselves & see what I mean... I did so with FF 2.0.0.6, IE 7.x, & Opera 9.23.
---
Opera also passed the "ACID2" test, for standards compliance (it is not alone here, but is over IE & FF, & it was the 6th browser to do so):
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/12/1416222.shtml
A descending chronological order in which browsers (and authoring tools) passed Acid2, per a tip I got from by rh0 (member 1110203) here on /.:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2
Safari, Prince, Shiira, Konqueror, Opera, & iCab
(Firefox's Acid2 compliant branch has been merged into the trunk, thus, Firefox 3 will likely be Acid2 compliant, but currently FF & IE are not passers of this test.)
---
And, Opera had features (like tabbed browsing) that other browsers (major 2 others in IE/FF) copied from it:
FIREFOX MYTHS:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html
(Yes, Opera had tabbed browsing before IE &/or FF, & other features as well. Opera comes FULLY LOADED features-wise, with a built in email client, IRC client, RSS client, & more + yet eats less RAM than others, & addons only bloat IE &/or FF even more memory-occupancy-wise. (AND YES, Opera has addons as well in "opera widgets" (like .xpi addons for FF))... apk -
Some facts as to WHY Opera "fanboys" are that way!
"And JFTR: Opera fanboys (the few that I've encountered) are worse than Linux, Mac and Amiga fanboys combined." - by cp.tar (871488) on Friday September 07, @06:25AM (#20505367)
Ok, but how can we NOT be, when facts like this are available, that note Opera's superiority?
To wit (quoting another user here, who had misconceptions about multithreaded design of Opera, OR even other browsers, for example):
"I'd like a multi threaded browser" - by Bert64 (520050) on Friday September 07, @05:19AM (#20505053)
Opera runs 8 threads here (per taskmgr.exe &/or process explorer) in the Windows model!
Hey... check it yourself! Taskmgr.exe &/or Process Explorer (microsoft tools) can show you this all, easily...
---
Some added "FYI" for those of you comparing FireFox/IE/Opera (this one is about security, super-important in today's online world, especially):
Opera security advisories @ SECUNIA (0% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/10615/?task=advisories
FireFox security advisories @ SECUNIA (43% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12434/
IE 7 security advisories @ SECUNIA (56% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12366/
---
Also, as far as speed comparisons? This is one that ALSO EXTOLLS OPERA's SPEED/EFFICIENCY BENEFITS over FF &/or IE here, & ON MULTIPLE OS PLATFORMS:
BROWSER SPEED COMPARISONS ON MANY TASKS & MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEM PLATFORMS:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
And, especially on Win32 OS', the most used PC platform/OS there is... & that one has MANY MORE evidences on many more types of browser activities, than this one that tests Opera 9.50's superiority in JavaScript parse & process (which this report on Opera here @ /. today, is about, ONLY):
http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/
---
The best parts are, OPERA IS FREE (as in BEER), & Opera has ALL of the features a body can need, WITHOUT using addons (though it has that via Opera widgets), & YET, Opera is LIGHTER ON MEMORY than FireFox &/or IE typically!
(You can check memory residency yourselves by loading FF, & Opera (& IE for Windows users) & test memory size occupancy via taskmgr.exe (or similar tools like Process Explorer) yourselves & see what I mean... I did so with FF 2.0.0.6, IE 7.x, & Opera 9.23.)
---
Opera also passed the "ACID2" test, for standards compliance (it is not alone here, but is over IE & FF, & it was the 6th browser to do so):
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/12/1416222.shtml
---
And, Opera had features (like tabbed browsing) that other browsers (major 2 others in IE/FF) copied from it... note the article below!
FIREFOX MYTHS:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html
Yes, Opera had tabbed browsing before IE &/or FF, & other features as well.
Opera comes FULLY LOADED features-wise, with a built in email client, IRC client, RSS client, & more + yet eats less RAM than others, & addons only bloat IE &/or FF even more memory-occupancy-wise. (AND YES, Opera has addons as well in "opera widgets" (like .xpi addons for FF)...
APK
P.S.=> The order in which both dev tools &/or browsers passed ACID2 compliance, is as follows: Safari #1, Prince #2, Shiira #3, Konqueror #4, OPERA #5, iCab #6 ... Thanks here goes to rh0 (member 1 -
Re:Who cares?"I'd like a multi threaded browser" - by Bert64 (520050) on Friday September 07, @05:19AM (#20505053) Opera runs 8 threads here (per taskmgr.exe &/or process explorer) in the Windows model... check it yourself!
APK
P.S.=> Some added "FYI" for those of you comparing FireFox/IE/Opera:
Opera security advisories @ SECUNIA (0% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/10615/?task=advisories
FireFox security advisories @ SECUNIA (43% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12434/
IE 7 security advisories @ SECUNIA (56% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12366/
(As far as security related vulnerabilities remaining unpatched, Opera leads here (super-important in today's online world where security IS a concern))
---
Also, as far as speed comparisons? This is one that also extolls Opera's benefits over FF &/or IE here, & ON MULTIPLE OS PLATFORMS:
BROWSER SPEED COMPARISONS ON MANY TASKS & MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEM PLATFORMS:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
And, especially on Win32 OS', the most used PC platform/OS there is...
---
(& the best part is, Opera has ALL of the features a body can need, WITHOUT using addons (though it has that via Opera widgets), & YET, Opera is LIGHTER ON MEMORY than FireFox &/or IE typically!)
You can check memory residency yourselves by loading FF, & Opera (& IE for Windows users) & test memory size occupancy via taskmgr.exe (or similar tools like Process Explorer) yourselves & see what I mean... I did so with FF 2.0.0.6, IE 7.x, & Opera 9.23.
---
Opera also passed the "ACID2" test, for standards compliance (it is not alone here, but is over IE & FF, & it was the 6th browser to do so):
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/12/1416222.shtml
A descending chronological order in which browsers (and authoring tools) passed Acid2, per a tip I got from by rh0 (member 1110203) here on /.:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2
Safari, Prince, Shiira, Konqueror, Opera, & iCab
(Firefox's Acid2 compliant branch has been merged into the trunk, thus, Firefox 3 will likely be Acid2 compliant, but currently FF & IE are not passers of this test.)
---
And, Opera had features (like tabbed browsing) that other browsers (major 2 others in IE/FF) copied from it:
FIREFOX MYTHS:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html
(Yes, Opera had tabbed browsing before IE &/or FF, & other features as well. Opera comes FULLY LOADED features-wise, with a built in email client, IRC client, RSS client, & more + yet eats less RAM than others, & addons only bloat IE &/or FF even more memory-occupancy-wise. (AND YES, Opera has addons as well in "opera widgets" (like .xpi addons for FF))... apk -
no mutli-core support (OPERA HAS MULTIPLE THREADS)"I wish there was a browser that was properly multithreaded available." - by AmiMoJo (196126) on Friday September 07, @07:40AM (#20505777) Opera runs 8 threads here (per taskmgr.exe &/or process explorer) in the Windows model... check it yourself!
(It has what you're asking for... & it is properly implemented)
APK
P.S.=> Some added "FYI" for those of you comparing FireFox/IE/Opera, as far as security. Especially as regards security related vulnerabilities remaining unpatched:
----
Opera security advisories @ SECUNIA (0% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/10615/?task=advisories
FireFox security advisories @ SECUNIA (43% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12434/
IE 7 security advisories @ SECUNIA (56% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12366/
(Given that information, as far as regards security problems in the code internally, Opera is ahead of the game by far in this capacity)
----
Also, as far as speed comparisons? This is one that also extolls Opera's benefits over FF &/or IE here, & ON MULTIPLE OS PLATFORMS:
BROWSER SPEED COMPARISONS ON MANY TASKS & MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEM PLATFORMS:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
----
(& the best part is, Opera has ALL of the features a body can need, WITHOUT using addons (though it has that via Opera widgets), & is LIGHTER ON MEMORY than FireFox &/or IE typically!)
You can check memory residency yourselves by loading FF, & Opera (& IE for Windows users) & test memory size occupancy via taskmgr.exe (or similar tools like Process Explorer) yourselves & see what I mean...
----
Opera also passed the "ACID2" test, for standards compliance (it is not alone here, but is over IE & FF, & it was iirc, the 5th or 6th browser to do so):
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/12/1416222.shtml
----
And, Opera had features other browsers (major 3) copied from it:
FIREFOX MYTHS:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html
(Yes, Opera had tabbed browsing before IE &/or FF, & other features as well. Opera comes FULLY LOADED features-wise, with a built in email client, IRC client, RSS client, & more + yet eats less RAM than others, & does not require addons to bloat it more, though it has those as well in "opera widgets" (like .xpi addons for FF))... apk -
Re:For The "I Have A Right To What You Sold Me" CrIt's a violation of the Terms of Service of most ISPs to degrade the service of other subscribers. I'm surprised your ISP hasn't done anything to stop "Jolly Roger". Have you complained to the ISP?
For example, Comcast's Acceptable Use Policy:Note: Comcast reserves the right to immediately terminate the Service and the Subscriber Agreement if you engage in any of the prohibited activities listed in this AUP or if you use the Comcast Equipment or Service in a way which is contrary to any Comcast policies or any of Comcast's suppliers' policies. You must strictly adhere to any policy set forth by another service provider accessed through the Service.
Here are a couple of the "Prohibted Uses and Activities":vii. restrict, inhibit, or otherwise interfere with the ability of any other person, regardless of intent, purpose or knowledge, to use or enjoy the Service, including, without limitation, posting or transmitting any information or software which contains a worm, virus, or other harmful feature, or generating levels of traffic sufficient to impede others' ability to send or retrieve information;
viii. restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or otherwise disrupt or cause a performance degradation, regardless of intent, purpose or knowledge, to the Service or any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) host, server, backbone network, node or service, or otherwise cause a performance degradation to any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) facilities used to deliver the Service;
Also note (emphasis mine):xiv. run programs, equipment, or servers from the Premises that provide network content or any other services to anyone outside of your Premises LAN (Local Area Network), also commonly referred to as public services or servers. Examples of prohibited services and servers include, but are not limited to, e-mail, Web hosting, file sharing, and proxy services and servers;
-
Re:Can the same technique be used against Comcast?Read their Terms of Use/Service. You are not allowed to mess with their network (in a harmful manner). They will probably cancel your service pretty fast...
From their Acceptable Use Policy:Note: Comcast reserves the right to immediately terminate the Service and the Subscriber Agreement if you engage in any of the prohibited activities listed in this AUP or if you use the Comcast Equipment or Service in a way which is contrary to any Comcast policies or any of Comcast's suppliers' policies. You must strictly adhere to any policy set forth by another service provider accessed through the Service.
Here's a couple of their "Prohibited Uses and Activities":vii. restrict, inhibit, or otherwise interfere with the ability of any other person, regardless of intent, purpose or knowledge, to use or enjoy the Service, including, without limitation, posting or transmitting any information or software which contains a worm, virus, or other harmful feature, or generating levels of traffic sufficient to impede others' ability to send or retrieve information;
viii. restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or otherwise disrupt or cause a performance degradation, regardless of intent, purpose or knowledge, to the Service or any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) host, server, backbone network, node or service, or otherwise cause a performance degradation to any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) facilities used to deliver the Service;
xxii. interfere with computer networking or telecommunications service to any user, host or network, including, without limitation, denial of service attacks, flooding of a network, overloading a service, improper seizing and abuse of operator privileges and attempts to "crash" a host;
On a side note, I find xviii somewhat ironic:xviii. impersonate any person or entity, engage in sender address falsification, forge anyone else's digital or manual signature, or perform any other similar fraudulent activity;
Isn't that similar to what Comcast is doing with your packets when forge RST packets? ;) -
Re:Firefox bookmark sync???"From this point of view, I think Opera has one up on Firefox by including it in the default installation (unless you don't believe in adding features to a browser that not everyone will use, of course)." - by MMC Monster (602931) on Monday September 03, @09:52AM (#20451347) Totally, 110% agreed... Opera truly is, "the superior warrior", as far as webbrowsers go, by ALL means!
(& the best part is, Opera has ALL of the features a body can need, WITHOUT using addons (though it has that via Opera widgets), & is LIGHTER ON MEMORY than FireFox &/or IE typically!)
You can check memory residency yourselves by loading FF, & Opera (& IE for Windows users) & test memory size occupancy via taskmgr.exe (or similar tools like Process Explorer) yourselves & see what I mean...
Opera's also faster than other browsers (best overall test I know of for that is here):
BROWSER SPEED COMPARISONS ON MANY TASKS & MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEM PLATFORMS:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
Opera also passed the "ACID2" test, for standards compliance... & iirc, before ANY other did... but, don't quote me on THAT account (before any other browser, because it may NOT have done it first, but the point is, that it did... be nice to know if it WAS first to do so, though, so thanks for ANY "FYI" on that account):
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/12/1416222.shtml
And, Opera had features other browsers (major 3) copied from it:
FIREFOX MYTHS:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html [comcast.net]
(AND, yes folks: Opera had tabbed browsing before IE, or FireFox/Mozilla AND YES, it can be extended with addons, if you look up "Opera Widgets")...
PLUS, Opera 9.23.8808 final build IS FREE + FULLY FEATURE LADEN, more than any other browser imo, without addons thrown in (as is, outta the box/stock oem model)
APK
P.S.=> Opera also shows LESS security vulnerabilities than the other 2 of the "big 3" & their most current builds/models/versions:
Opera security advisories @ SECUNIA (0% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/10615/?task=advisories
FireFox security advisories @ SECUNIA (43% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12434/
IE 7 security advisories @ SECUNIA (56% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12366/
apk -
Re:really crappy sci fi
Very cool (actually, it was "notched electron" and further reduced to "chipped quantum", and then later "nudged quanta"!). The wikipedia article has a link to the full text (written in 1961), as well.
From it:
[...] all of which were producing *books* in torrents.
How ahead of his time he was!
:)I also liked this gem:
[...] whole branches of knowledge could for the first time be put in a nutshell.
And, wow: he even envisioned Google, over 30 years before it came into existence (emphasis mine):
The position was well put indeed in a famous speech by Jzbl to the graduates of the Central Saturnian University, when he said that it was a source of great pride to him that although hardly anybody knew anything any longer, everybody now knew how to find out everything.
-
Re:This isn't anything newLet's make it easier for you: http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp Network, Bandwidth, Data Storage and Other Limitations Comcast may provide versions of the Service with different speeds and bandwidth usage limitations, among other characteristics, subject to applicable Service plans. You shall ensure that your use of the Service does not restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or degrade any other user's use of the Service, nor represent (in the sole judgment of Comcast) an overly large burden on the network. In addition, you shall ensure that your use of the Service does not restrict, inhibit, interfere with, disrupt, degrade, or impede Comcast's ability to deliver and provide the Service and monitor the Service, backbone, network nodes, and/or other network services. You further agree to comply with all Comcast network, bandwidth, and data storage and usage limitations. You shall ensure that your bandwidth consumption using the Service does not exceed the limitations that are now in effect or may be established in the future. If your use of the Service results in the consumption of bandwidth in excess of the applicable limitations, that is a violation of this Policy. In such cases, Comcast may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your Service account or request that you subscribe to a version of the Service with higher bandwidth usage limitations if you wish to continue to use the Service at higher bandwidth consumption levels. In case thats still unclear: http://www.comcast.net/terms/subscriber.jsp Facilities Allocation. Comcast reserves the right to determine, in its discretion, and on an ongoing basis, the nature and extent of its facilities allocated to support HSI, including, but not limited to, the amount of bandwidth to be utilized and delivered in conjunction with HSI. Unless you are subject to a HSI service plan that expressly provides otherwise, we recommend that you connect only a single computer to HSI and that you disable file and print sharing and other capabilities that allow outside users to gain access to the Customer Equipment. So there it is. If you need to know the set limit you're already the type of person that's going to push the envelope and you need to pay $40 more for a business account for true unlimited bandwidth. The first disclaimer tells you: You shall ensure that your bandwidth consumption using the Service does not exceed the limitations that are now in effect or may be established in the future. Now, IANAL, but that tells me that even if they did give you a set limit....they can change it whenever and however they see fit.
-
Re:This isn't anything newLet's make it easier for you: http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp Network, Bandwidth, Data Storage and Other Limitations Comcast may provide versions of the Service with different speeds and bandwidth usage limitations, among other characteristics, subject to applicable Service plans. You shall ensure that your use of the Service does not restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or degrade any other user's use of the Service, nor represent (in the sole judgment of Comcast) an overly large burden on the network. In addition, you shall ensure that your use of the Service does not restrict, inhibit, interfere with, disrupt, degrade, or impede Comcast's ability to deliver and provide the Service and monitor the Service, backbone, network nodes, and/or other network services. You further agree to comply with all Comcast network, bandwidth, and data storage and usage limitations. You shall ensure that your bandwidth consumption using the Service does not exceed the limitations that are now in effect or may be established in the future. If your use of the Service results in the consumption of bandwidth in excess of the applicable limitations, that is a violation of this Policy. In such cases, Comcast may, in its sole discretion, terminate or suspend your Service account or request that you subscribe to a version of the Service with higher bandwidth usage limitations if you wish to continue to use the Service at higher bandwidth consumption levels. In case thats still unclear: http://www.comcast.net/terms/subscriber.jsp Facilities Allocation. Comcast reserves the right to determine, in its discretion, and on an ongoing basis, the nature and extent of its facilities allocated to support HSI, including, but not limited to, the amount of bandwidth to be utilized and delivered in conjunction with HSI. Unless you are subject to a HSI service plan that expressly provides otherwise, we recommend that you connect only a single computer to HSI and that you disable file and print sharing and other capabilities that allow outside users to gain access to the Customer Equipment. So there it is. If you need to know the set limit you're already the type of person that's going to push the envelope and you need to pay $40 more for a business account for true unlimited bandwidth. The first disclaimer tells you: You shall ensure that your bandwidth consumption using the Service does not exceed the limitations that are now in effect or may be established in the future. Now, IANAL, but that tells me that even if they did give you a set limit....they can change it whenever and however they see fit.
-
Re:I wouldn't call them asshats
Well, I've never seen a broadband provider in the US advertise "unmetered" service. EVER. That's not what you get when you sign the service agreement.
Direct from Comcast AUP:
viii. restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or otherwise disrupt or cause a performance degradation, regardless of intent, purpose or knowledge, to the Service or any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) host, server, backbone network, node or service, or otherwise cause a performance degradation to any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) facilities used to deliver the Service;
Using 100% of your line speed 24/7 all month long will do the above. Not to mention there is one about using their service to download copyrighted content, regardless of performance degredation; you can have your service suspended. Anyone clearing 300GB/month cannot tell me all they download are demos and linux distros. I call Shenanigans to the nth degree on that one.
And for those complaining there is nothing about excessive b/w usage in comcasts AUP, I refer you directly to it: http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp as it is clearly there. -
On Opera speed, memory residency, + securitySOME "FYI" ON SPEED, MEMORY OCCUPANCY, & SECURITY (for Opera, vs. the other 2 major players in IE, & FIREFOX): "He seems to think that Opera is fast." - by ChrisMaple (607946) on Sunday August 19, @11:16PM (#20289859) So do others, as evidenced here (the most comprehensive & even-handed/fair comparison of browser speed online that I have found, to date):
BROWSER SPEED COMPARISONS ON MANY TASKS & MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEM PLATFORMS:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
(Especially on the MOST USED OS PLATFORM ON THE PC, Windows, but also, overall!)
---- "My experience has been that although Opera renders more accurately than Firefox (1.5.0.2)" - by ChrisMaple (607946) on Sunday August 19, @11:16PM (#20289859) It passed the "ACID2" test, & iirc, before ANY other did... but, don't quote me on THAT account (before any other browser):
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/03/12/1416222.shtml
AND, just 2 days ago, I loaded Opera 9.23.8808, FireFox 2.0.0.6, & IE7 fully hotfix patched as of last "Microsoft Patch Tuesday", & the memory usage was in this order:
- Per Taskmanager processes tab, prior to minimizing the window (which causes unused application features to page back to the backing .exe file on disk, summoned only when needed, & Opera won that one, too)
IE7 (least, with GOOGLE toolbar) memory usage = 19,048k
Opera (next least - & no widgets installed) = 18,272k
FireFox (most - & no addons installed) = 31,172k
Read 'em & weep, or test yourself - your numbers SHOULD be the same, unless you opened a lot of tabs in them, OR extended your say, FireFox with .xpi addons, &/or IE with addons & toolbars from 3rd parties that is... which probably will make YOUR readings worse/higher imo on a guess.
---- "Opera is a lot slower." - by ChrisMaple (607946) on Sunday August 19, @11:16PM (#20289859) Says you... others say differently, per the url & test above, as well as the security data below (as far as that is concerned, & today online? IT IS A DEFINITE CONCERN!) plus, if you are a FireFox fan? Perhaps you ought to look @ this page:
FIREFOX MYTHS:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyt hs.html
AND, yes folks:
Opera had tabbed browsing before IE, or FireFox/Mozilla AND YES, it can be extended with addons, if you look up "Opera Widgets"...
PLUS, Opera 9.23.8080 final biuld IS FREE + FULLY FEATURE LADEN, more than any other browser imo, without addons thrown in (as is, outta the box/stock oem model)
APK
P.S.=> Opera also shows LESS security vulnerabilities than the other 2 of the "big 3" & their most current builds/models/versions:
Opera security advisories @ SECUNIA (0% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/10615/?task=advisories
FireFox security advisories @ SECUNIA (43% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12434/
IE 7 security advisories @ SECUNIA (56% unpatched):
http://secunia.com/product/12366/
apk -
Re:Papers please!7...... How much more do we have to add to really start becoming scared?
Try this list of additions.
-
Re:TOS: no servers at allUntil they define what they mean, all arguments that rely on the notion of "server" are specious.
... and, incidentally, they do exactly that:run programs, equipment, or servers from the Premises that provide network content or any other services to anyone outside of your Premises LAN (Local Area Network), also commonly referred to as public services or servers. Examples of prohibited services and servers include, but are not limited to, e-mail, Web hosting, file sharing, and proxy services and servers;
Clear enough for you?
http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp -
wrongYou can find the TOS here: http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp
Under prohibited activities, you find:run programs, equipment, or servers from the Premises that provide network content or any other services to anyone outside of your Premises LAN (Local Area Network), also commonly referred to as public services or servers. Examples of prohibited services and servers include, but are not limited to, e-mail, Web hosting, file sharing, and proxy services and servers;
Also:restrict, inhibit, interfere with, or otherwise disrupt or cause a performance degradation, regardless of intent, purpose or knowledge, to the Service or any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) host, server, backbone network, node or service, or otherwise cause a performance degradation to any Comcast (or Comcast supplier) facilities used to deliver the Service;
Furthermore, they are free to define any other activities as "prohibited" any time they like. -
Re:Then screw them....
You are right this is definitely a campaign against Firefox and has nothing to do with AdBlock. If you notice the links on the page this is from the same guy who wrote this garbage. I believe this was on slashdot a year ago or so.
-
Re:More Firefox Fun FactsYeah, I read that page and thought it was retarded. It wouldn't even be worth dissecting in a first year critical thinking class when they cover strawmen. Even if the entire class was retarded too.
And check out this little gem on his Vista page: Windows Vista has modest minimum system requirements that everyone with a system from within the last 5 years should have no problem meeting. -
Tesla
-
Re:Woah (definitions of theories, laws, hypothesis
A scientific fact is something real. "Granite is hard" "Water is soft" "Non-saline water freezes at 32 degrees celcius under 15 atmospheres of pressure".
If the globe is warmer (on average or specifically) then that is a fact.
WHY it is warmer will always be a theory.
There are many hypothesis about why we are measuring warmer temperatures.
Right now, in my opinion, there is too much money and political pressure involved to get good science.
anyway...
Definitions:
Theories, Laws, Hypothesis...
They say it well here: http://home.comcast.net/~fsteiger/theory.htm
As used in science, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.
Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. A clear distinction needs to be made between facts (things which can be observed and/or measured) and theories (explanations which correlate and interpret the facts.
A fact is something that is supported by unmistakeable evidence. For example, the Grand Canyon cuts through layers of different kinds of rock, such as the Coconino sandstone, Hermit shale, and Redwall limestone. These rock layers often contain fossils that are found only in certain layers. Those are the facts.
And here: http://chemistry.about.com/od/chemistry101/a/lawth eory.htm
Hypothesis
A hypothesis is an educated guess, based on observation. Usually, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted through experimentation or more observation. A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true.
Theory
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.
Law
A law generalizes a body of observations. At the time it is made, no exceptions have been found to a law. Scientific laws explain things, but they do not describe them. One way to tell a law and a theory apart is to ask if the description gives you a means to explain 'why'.
Example: Consider Newton's Law of Gravity. Newton could use this law to predict the behavior of a dropped object, but he couldn't explain why it happened.
---
I have also read elsewhere that really Newton's "laws" are only called laws because of history. If they were formulated today, they would be called Newton's theory of gravity. -
Re:Redux
But the Java pop-up you can't stop has been around FAR longer than that: http://home.comcast.net/~wolfand/
"Little do you know, a real person made this page." -
Re:Star Wars Fakeout
Bah. Tunguska wasn't an impact event, it was a weapons test. (pdf alert)
-
Spacom!
Reminds me of a little something called SPACOM...
"Cuts through this tomato like it was a tin can!"
"Snapples caps off of jugs, jars, and the baby!"
"And boy does it catch fish!" -
Yeah, they hate Firefox.
They also hate KMail, Linspire, Thunderbird, and Eudora, even though they have instructions on the Comcast website on how to set these things up to work with the Comcast email servers. They actively sit around and brood with their hatred for alternative browsers, even though their help site has instructions on how to make Firefox your default browser. They hate Firefox, Opera, Camino, and Safari, even though they say these browsers will work with their service.
Yep, they hate anything that's not from Microsoft. -
Yeah, they hate Firefox.
They also hate KMail, Linspire, Thunderbird, and Eudora, even though they have instructions on the Comcast website on how to set these things up to work with the Comcast email servers. They actively sit around and brood with their hatred for alternative browsers, even though their help site has instructions on how to make Firefox your default browser. They hate Firefox, Opera, Camino, and Safari, even though they say these browsers will work with their service.
Yep, they hate anything that's not from Microsoft. -
Yeah, they hate Firefox.
They also hate KMail, Linspire, Thunderbird, and Eudora, even though they have instructions on the Comcast website on how to set these things up to work with the Comcast email servers. They actively sit around and brood with their hatred for alternative browsers, even though their help site has instructions on how to make Firefox your default browser. They hate Firefox, Opera, Camino, and Safari, even though they say these browsers will work with their service.
Yep, they hate anything that's not from Microsoft. -
Re:Great Quote for His Interview
For all interested parties, there is more info on the Maelstrom II short movie here:
http://home.comcast.net/~jeroen-lapre/ArthurCClark e/MaelstromII/MaelstromII.html -
Re:Old tech
Couple this with a nice, but small capacitor, with a capacity for 2-3 shocks (probably 5-15mA per discharge will be sufficient), and you've got a nice little pacemaker that recharges itself.
Amusingly, self-charging pacemakers have existed for the better part of 40 years. Pacemakers used to be powered by radioisotopes which had a power-producing lifespan far in excess of the patient's remaining expected lifespan. The only catch with such pacemakers was that they had to be removed after death to recover the valuable Pu-238 materials for remanufacturing and reuse.
According to this article by a Dr. David Prutchi PhD, the devices fell out of favor due to the availability of lithium batteries capable of lasting a decade before replacement. However, one does have to wonder if the public fear of all things nuclear didn't contribute to the downfall of such devices. -
More lies from NYC
The USA is becoming a police state: http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.htm
l -
Re:If you're worried about artificial limitations.
I'm sorry but I've got to ask the question: How many years since the last time you used MythTV? I find MythTV very easy to use[1].
It's slow and clunky
I run a shared backend and frontend on my Athlon 2000 server which has 3 tuners. When I have 3 recordings active it takes a couple of seconds to start playing a video but other than that..
uses an odd format
My DVB-T recordings come out as bog standard MPEG-2 files. If you're using analog tuners, there are tools available to transcode the Nupple format. mythtranscode even comes with MythTV and has a GUI frontend called MythArchive that can even burn video DVDs.
and has a god-awful interface
I'm running the MePo Theme on my frontend and I love it.
It's so ridiculously focused on TV that you have to go up 5 levels of menus, then down 5 more, to look through the other videos you have available.
This is a gross exaggeration. See the screenshots linked to above. "Media Library" contains "Watch Recordings" which is for TV recordings (third screenshot) and the next item down is "Watch Videos" which lists all my XviD, VIDEO_TS, etc files as they are laid out on disk from my file server (which happens to be the same box).
And to get back to the TV programs? Yep, just as many steps.
Press the back button twice (once to leave Videos, again to return to Main Menu). Or if you have spare keys on your remote, you can bind buttons to jump straight to whatever screen you want.
[1] Yes it is harder to setup than some other solutions and there's far more configuration options that can be a bit confusing (hint: defaults are generally fine).
If you can get your tuners working (I'll assume DVB tuners) in Xine or similiar or even just scanning correctly (tzap, scan), it's an apt-get and 10 minutes of configuring your channels and playing with some preferences to suit your taste. There's many howtos out there on how to do all this.
</rant>
Edit: I forgot the obligatory "I know I'm going to be modded down for this" :) -
Re:Background on the crash
Doesn't hurt as much as you'd imagine, the pain overwhelms before the mind can process it into anything like hurt or agony. After the blisters break open and big flaps of skin fall away so the air can hit the raw nerve ending that's when it starts to hurt
-
I Don't See It
I don't see it...
Wait. You mean I have to go to a special other website? linux.dell.com? This means you have to choose which operating system you want before you even begin. How the hell is some grandmother supposed to choose anything but Windows if there's no mention of Ubuntu anywhere on www.dell.com?
This is pathetic. I want to see Windows and Ubuntu next to one another on the choose operating system option menu so the consumers can see there are other options. This is depressing. -
TheMichaelSmith
Many moons ago, I was amazed by the transforming Beetle that Michael Smith produced http://www.themichaelsmith.com/animations/VWHiRes
. mpg. After watching it I hoped that someone would make a movie and hire this guy. Now I see that he's done it again with a Nissan 350Z http://home.comcast.net/~themichaelsmith/TransZ.mp g!!! Personally I prefer the look of his robot as opposed to those in the trailer for some reason... Sav -
Re:"Problem solved by live in geek?" - So that's n
Actually, there's a plugin.. nsplugin wrapper. It'll let you run the 32-bit flash plugin in 64-bit Firefox on 64-bit Linux. I've been playing with it all morning.
Slashdot is broken:
Slow Down Cowboy!
Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.
It's been 35 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment -
Re:Rotary Phone Disorder
I have a rotary phone at home too (I love retro stuff).
Mine is the old-fashioned type that has the separate part you speak into on its own cord. And the ringer consists of brass bells and a small brass hammer...that sucker is LOUD. I mean waking the dead loud. I love it. I'm glad my landline provider still supports rotary. :)
Here's a pic. -
Terms of ServiceI don't care how fast they are, I refuse to accept their terms of service. Quoting from http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp:
Prohibited uses include, but are not limited to, using the Service, Customer Equipment, or the Comcast Equipment to:
ii. post, store, send, transmit, or disseminate any information or material which a reasonable person could deem to be objectionable, offensive, indecent, pornographic, harassing, threatening, embarrassing, distressing, vulgar, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive, or otherwise inappropriate, regardless of whether this material or its dissemination is unlawful;
I refuse to give up my lawful pornographic material stored on my own computer just so I can switch away from DSL.
-
Re:How Orwellian
I think their reasoning is more like:
Exposure is Truth
Disclosure is Duty
Hidden is Guilty
Self is Wrong
States have secrets worth protecting, people have secrets worth revealing.
Really though, Big Brother did not justify himself this way. He'd just throw you in jail until you were ready to say how much you loved the state and then murder you. Thank goodness the US does not have prisons where you can be thrown without charge and murdered for spite without a fair trial. Stuff like that would make the US a police state. Thinking otherwise is a thought crime that will put you on a domestic spying list. Can't let one or two bad apples sink the whole country!
-
Liberal eugenics
read it Neo Eugenics
-
Re:I don't see how this is any turnaround
GNU/Linux is a memory hog, particularly when GUI interfaces are involved.
1) It's not called GNU/Linux, no matter how much you want it to be, until Linus changes the trademark.
2) When you're writing your own GUI, you can make it smaller and lighter than GNOME or what have you. Reference FBUI which would run on a fucking game boy if you could get the rest of the kernel there.
Go back to the early pieces on OLPC: how many people kept saying that (Nick) Negroponte was either deluded or lying about the cost, and that by the time it came out, the OLPC would cost almost exactly what a cheap laptop with Windows cost? Surprise -- that's exactly what happened.
Yes, now they say it will cost $170. But the price will come down with production, assuming anyone actually ponies up the cash.
-
Re:The Street
I was going to wait til "Mr Slippery" contacted me...
don't forget the roots:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=True_Nam es&oldid=116683982Vernor Vinge
And in case you've never read it...
http://home.comcast.net/~kngjon/truename/truename. htmlThe novella
- the mailman