Slashdot Mirror

lolololol.

If you're interested in not installing poorly written unprotected software on your system, you can install a hosts file manually. It's not hard to do yourself. Here's one that works fine.. If you want something self-updating, adding an RBL to your router's DNS works wonders. (easy to set up with DNSmasq, and better performance than a hosts file! can cache for performance but still receive hourly updates)

ZIP

P.S. => My last name isn't Patterson. So hopefully APK doesn't do something regrettable to some innocent dude.

Use Ip Hole or similar where possible. It will be great on your (guest-)network. You can also installl it on your local linux portable.
Or if you bind already, add the domains and point them to 0.0.0.0. Plenty of lists out there. I use http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

Or you can use the the hosts file available at http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... It's a little bulky at 470K bytes or so, and I haven't the slightest idea where Windows hides the hosts file nowadays (Unixen put it where they always have at /etc/hosts) But it certainly does work for linux.

If and when web advertisers clean up their act and quit trying to play games with me and MY computer, I'll be more than happy to remove my hosts file and display their ads (if they will kindly serve them promptly and keep the number and bandwidth within reason. And as long as they don't even think about including audio). .However, I imagine that in practice, I'll simply skip past their ads just like I do with magazine and newspaper ads.

I use a stand alone [i.e. not a browser extension] ad-blocker called Pup_Advert_Blocker shipped with Puppy Linux [but there's no reason it can't run on other Linux distros]. It works lie a charm.

Or you can use the the hosts file available at http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... It's a little bulky at 470K bytes or so, and I haven't the slightest idea where Windows hides the hosts file nowadays (Unixen put it where they always have at /etc/hosts) But it certainly does work for linux.

If and when web advertisers clean up their act and quit trying to play games with me and MY computer, I'll be more than happy to remove my hosts file and display their ads (if they will kindly serve them promptly and keep the number and bandwidth within reason. And as long as they don't even think about including audio). .However, I imagine that in practice, I'll simply skip past their ads just like I do with magazine and newspaper ads.

mvps provides one of your lists. Here's what they say about using a host file for security - "Simply using a HOSTS file is not a cure-all against all the dangers on the Internet". hpHosts say something similar.

If nothing 'cures all', then nothing is effective on its own. You admit, just as your sources do, that you need something more.
And I contend that if you're already using other things, then there's very little utility in adding the overhead of your solution.

I'm not 'twisting' anything. All you do is hurl the things you've been accused of back in a childish tantrum.

---

*laugh* you spend 99% of your time via a hostfile, which makes lookups 1%? Last post it was 2%

If you still use then DNS you aren't avoiding their logs. You may be reducing, but that's meaningless. 'Anonymous' is ungradeable. You can't be 'mostly anonymous', just like you can't be 'slightly pregnant'.

If you've added 100 sites to your list, how is that more of a 'nightmare' than whitelisting via a browser extension? It's the same thing. Only the add-on does more and is easier to use. Double standard. Hypocrisy.

*laugh* maintenance is 2 minutes now? It was 5 minutes just a post ago?

Faster resolution? Sure, you can save milliseconds if you're prepared to spend minutes. Hooray!

You're a crank.

APK. Save milliseconds by spending 2-5 minutes each day! Almost, but not quite, anonymous! Ineffective on its own!

I love your links. You never really read them.

The link, above points to two sources of hosts files - hpHosts and mvps.

mvps says - "Simply using a HOSTS file is not a cure-all against all the dangers on the Internet"
and
hpHosts says - "hpHosts is a community managed and maintained hosts file that allows an additional layer of protection against access to ad, tracking and malicious websites "

Do you use those sources? They both state that this should not be your only security. That this adds a layer of protection.

The original article also states that the speed benefits are negligible.

None of them support the exagerrated claims you make.

APK. Even his sources agree, a host file on its own is not a cure-all and should only ever be part of a security process

it's STARTING (as I knew it would))

*laugh*
Sure. After nearly 30 years.

Tech journalists post these articles every year or so. It's a curiosity. A 'hey did you know' kind of thing. It's niche, of limited utility and none of them make the sort of exaggerated claims you do.

Let's see, following the links from the article, we get to mvps.org. Do you download their file? Here's what they say - "Simply using a HOSTS file is not a cure-all against all the dangers on the Internet"

How about that. They disagree with your outrageous claims.

Let's try hosts-file.net. Do you use them? They say - "hpHosts is a community managed and maintained h0sts file that allows an additional layer of protection against access to ad, tracking and malicious websites. "

Hmm, they seem to think that this is, at best, an additional layer to add to your existing security.

Would you care to comment? Or are you going to go off on one of your ridiculous rants about how I need to prove something before you'll listen; how I'm a stalker/anonymous/something; how you've beaten/made-me-eat-my-words/won before; etc

APK. Even the people who compile the lists you use don't make the claims you make

There is no place like 127.0.0.1 http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... Host flash: https://journalxtra.com/linux/...

Don't waste bandwidth on untrusted domains.
Fix your hosts file here.

- MVPS Hosts Guy

You can try downloading the hosts file from http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... and installing it in the appropriate place -- e.g. /etc/hosts on most(?) Unix distributions. It'll bust a lot of stuff of course, but if you can live with that, mostly ads will be a thing of the past. You may need to update the hosts file from time to time.

I'd suggest keeping a backup of the original hosts file (if any) and maybe of the last one you can live with as well.just in case the most recent one someday kills a site you can't live without.

What I do is use http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho......

I use that URL too, but I use it in the referrer field whenever I visit uBlock or JS Blocker to grab them. I hear that's how APK gets his wings.

What I do is use http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... but not as a hosts file. I have my own DNS server set up and do a daily update.

Are there no simple DNS servers that only listen on localhost and where you could add this.

Mine is about the same age, I think. The only reason I am thinking in buying a new PC is that the small form factor becomes possible.

I am not a gamer, I do have 3 4K screens and all they do is desktop stuff, basically.

My first one was a 364DX. I then bought a new one about every 1.5 years and the speed difference was obvious. Did that for a while till it was every 4 years. The last one I bought was not really noticeable in speed once I configured the ad blockers and my own DNS server (using mvps hosts, it filters out a LOT(*)) the speed is great in usage. The bottleneck in speed is now me, as a user and not the machine.

Having a faster machine would be like comparing a old beetle and a Ferrari in heavy traffic. You will get there at the same time.

Yes, I have installed newer verions of my OS and run now Debian Jessie with XFCE. I am sure it will be ok for several more years

Most people will only use a browser and not much more.

(*)Added advantage is that other devices at my home use the same DNS server, so they are a lot faster as well when I am at home due to the blocking of a lot of things where the domains point to 0.0.0.0

True, but blocking with a hosts file is so easy especially when great sources like this:

http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm

And are so easy to automate updates of.

Or you can download this text file and update your hosts file with it. http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

I can't actually be sure it blocks the ads because I pay for their ad free service (I do it for the music but it covers youtube ads as well) but it used to.

Checkout; http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

Stop instructing your browser to block things. You don't need an add-on to define network connections. Start telling your network stack where to not find them:

HOSTS-level blocking
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

And if that's not enough, look into PAC files. You won't be disappointed.

No man. The shit ON adfly and thepiratebay and any other unscrupulous site. You may block THOSE *sites*, but they contain references, scripts, popups, and resources that you don't block, that are part of malware ad networks across the internet. Your idea isn't a bad one, but your list is so weak and small and incomplete that it becomes useless. You could just http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... and http://www.malwaredomainlist.c... for instance, merge them together, smack them into your own hosts file and have a MUCH MUCH more complete list than you maintain.

Your lack of success is your own fault

This is why I always try to block ads as much as possible. I'm using this customized hosts file ,uBlock Origin and Ghostery (there are Chrome versions for the addons too).

This makes my web experience extremely smooth (no dumb annoying ads all over the place) and reduces one big malware/virus/infection vector.

As I know that some adblockers can get shady (adblock plus comes to mind), that's why I use both uBlock Origin and Ghostery. That way, if one tries to slip some ads because they are from a "friendly" company, the other usually with catch it. I've seen this happen in Chrome, where Ghostery was trying to redirect traffic to a place and uBlock to another. Let them fight it off, at the end of the day, still not a single ad :) The hosts file is the final trench, and as it is updated with a certain regularity (and there are different customized hosts files floating around), it is a sort of final layer of armor into my Windows installation.

The result of all this is that I've been going anti-virus/malware free for at least quite a few years, only with the default security software from Windows. No ads, weird "unexplained" virus infections, etc. Oh, I also don't click on dumb stuff that comes via email. The secret is reducing the attack surface, sort of speak, and getting rid of ads is like plugging that pipe of raw sewer shit that comes right into your home.

The industry can cry as much as they want because we, as consumers, are blocking ads, and stealing bread from people's mouths. But just as I can just skip ads on my TV (I can go to the kitchen or record the broadcasts and skip the ads), I have that right to do the same online. If you can't make a business without shoving unsorted, unchecked, miscellaneous ads down your users throat's, then that's your problem. Also, if I think your content is worth it, I will definitely pay for it. But if you are trying to serve me some rehashed shit , just like hundreds of sites (I'm looking at you, online media sites, newspapers, etc.), I'll just skip your stuff all together and find what I want in some other site.

If you want to prevent tracking, on Firefox,Ghostery and uBlock Origin are your friends :)
That and a nice hosts file will keep you out of a lot of trouble :)
This new Firefox feature sounds really sweet, this makes a lot of sense. If all the Operating Systems can support "multiple users", why can't our browsers, in 2016, support segregation of web sessions?
Make the frontier the Window, the browser instance, the tab, I don't care. Just give us the option to have multiple identities when connected and that's a huge step forward.
The "incognito" or "private" mode was a step in the right direction, but that makes the total number of simultaneous identities to 2: the incognito window and the normal one.
I believe this is a good step on the right direction, decoupling the sessions from all the "infrastructure" (cookies ,history, etc.) is the foundation to later add all the customization and segmentation we might want. Again, on any modern OS, you will get your own "partition" of the system configurations (registry or configuration files), so in essence, the browsers must go the route of the OS: enable multiple identities, running segregated on the same machine, without interfering with each other.

Unfortunately it is become more and more complicated to keep one's information off the internet. Multiple solutions are required:

1. Use a hosts file that blocks ads / tracking cookies / spam, etc.. mvps.hosts.txt
2. If you use Chrome always browse in Incognito
3. If on Windows periodically run Spybot Search and Destroy
4. Avoid Fazebook, LinkedIn, and other data-harvesting sites
5. Use Privacy Badger
6. Always deny contacts
7. Stay off the internet as much as possible.

I'm sure others will post more tips.

Just block the bad sites.
Simple and fast. I have added it to my firewall DNS, so all equipment is protected without local changes.

Yes, because it's SO HARD to just hop to a new domain.

Just block the bad sites.
Simple and fast. I have added it to my firewall DNS, so all equipment is protected without local changes.

The guy at this site maintains a crazy list of advertisers and malicious site DNS records... then points them all to 0.0.0.0 using host file format. It has served me well for years now.

http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

Google blocks AdAway and is working much harder to prevent root. This jailing of the user is meant to force the use of the app store which allows them to monetize personal data (being "scrubbed" (year right)) and targeted marketing.

When apps that help to truly make your experience secure ( such as adaway that use fdroid and require root) by blocking horrible ads, scumware, malware, and other trash used by marketing on the internet.

I use various lists just on hosts via android and dns creating blackhole zones with these lists:
https://adaway.org/hosts.txt
http://adaway.sufficientlysecu...
http://hosts-file.net/ad_serve...
https://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers...
http://sysctl.org/cameleon/hos...
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp200...
http://someonewhocares.org/hos...

Fanboy has some good lists as well

A lot of these lists are not for blocking ads but for blocking really bad content from coming into your browsing experience.

When Google and Apple actively prevent me from cleaning up this rubbish on a device I own and they kill all apps that attempt to do any of this and they remove all the hooks from the OS to allow us to do this its really a poor situation.

Now I have to worry about fdroid going away while Google claims this is a fight against amazon - scamazon. As much as I dislike Bezos and Scamazon and want Google to keep them with a better offering, banning 3rd party appstores and apps is a bad idea because its the only way we can bypass the draconian and ridiculous "rules" the official rules of either Apple or Google app stores force on developers. There are a lot of useless apps out there but they have banned many useful ones because they conflict with their interests and not with safety or security.

Google blocks AdAway and is working much harder to prevent root. This jailing of the user is meant to force the use of the app store which allows them to monetize personal data (being "scrubbed" (year right)) and targeted marketing.

When apps that help to truly make your experience secure ( such as adaway that use fdroid and require root) by blocking horrible ads, scumware, malware, and other trash used by marketing on the internet.

I use various lists just on hosts via android and dns creating blackhole zones with these lists:
https://adaway.org/hosts.txt
http://adaway.sufficientlysecu...
http://hosts-file.net/ad_serve...
https://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers...
http://sysctl.org/cameleon/hos...
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp200...
http://someonewhocares.org/hos...

Fanboy has some good lists as well

A lot of these lists are not for blocking ads but for blocking really bad content from coming into your browsing experience.

When Google and Apple actively prevent me from cleaning up this rubbish on a device I own and they kill all apps that attempt to do any of this and they remove all the hooks from the OS to allow us to do this its really a poor situation.

Now I have to worry about fdroid going away while Google claims this is a fight against amazon - scamazon. As much as I dislike Bezos and Scamazon and want Google to keep them with a better offering, banning 3rd party appstores and apps is a bad idea because its the only way we can bypass the draconian and ridiculous "rules" the official rules of either Apple or Google app stores force on developers. There are a lot of useless apps out there but they have banned many useful ones because they conflict with their interests and not with safety or security.

LOL!

Nice joke, but, nah, I manually blocks hosts via the fantastic hosts plain text file which can be done at the router level -- he is always spamming some 3rd party solution.

Three words: etc fucking hosts.

https://github.com/chrisaljoud...
faster, more efficient, and doesnt have a guilty conscience about blocking ALL the ads.

while you're at it,
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

block advertisers by null routing them.

I use a different one, but the principle is sound and it works great; no Adblock needed. One change I'd make to yours is to uncomment some lines, like these:

#127.0.0.1 google-analytics.com # breaks some sites
#127.0.0.1 ssl.google-analytics.com
#127.0.0.1 www.google-analytics.l.google.com

So it "breaks some sites". Haven't noticed that myself, and don't care if it does.

I'll scream this again... HOSTS FILE!!! Ad free for 10 years. Simple to install, blocks other parasites as well. http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

Choose your character:

Windows 95

Windows 98

Windows ME

Windows NT

Windows 2k

Windows XP

And just for kicks, here's one for Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs Win FLP.

1) Use Solitare from e.g. Windows 7 (google for Microsoft Games Patcher).
2) Update your hosts: http://pgl.yoyo.org/ and http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ .

I've had a very good experience with this one. I'm accustomed to it now, so using someone else's computer without it (or similar) feels like swimming in a shark-infested pool with turds floating in front of my face.

... Sort of. I have a giant ad-blocking /etc/hosts file, and since I actually run httpd on all of my Macs, I often see my own 404 page in an iframe on sites I visit. So, yeah, works for me. :D

If you want to advertise, host the ads inline on your own domain.
If it's on MVPS hosts, it's invisible to me.

p.s. just manually added 223.224.131.144 to my HOSTS file

Probably doesn't hurt to regularly update one's host file with a blacklist. The one I've been using is this:

http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...

Yes. I don't believe that you can block ALL Google stuff, but you can indeed block the GA servers. http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... I'm to lazy to read all through it again, but I'm pretty sure that one blocks Google Analytics. If I'm wrong, you should be able to find one that does with a simple search.

"I do it on the /etc/hosts level on my dns server. You can find large lists of ad domains that can be added to your hosts file with 127.0.0.1 or 0.0.0.0 to cause them to fail. This covers all machines on your network that use your dns server. The one I use is http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho [mvps.org]... [mvps.org] however they have become slow with updating it. You might want to invest some time in looking for one that is updated more frequently." - by qwertyatwork (668720) on Sunday March 17, @10:39AM (#43196749)

Guess what? Since DNS rides on the IP stack, then that would work on THEIR END @ OPENDNS TOO overriding the DNS server program itself, since it uses the IP stack, which uses hosts as a filter!

(most likely, but ask them)

ANY DNS SERVER (blocked in hosts would block that DNS server too for bad entries)

After all... it all rides on IP, & hosts are queried FIRST, before anything else BY DEFAULT, dumbass...

APK

P.S.=> However, I've *ALWAYS* been rather curious about that... you said they work 'server-side' over @ OpenDNS?

That DNS server program?

Guess what??

It TOO, RIDES on an OS, that queries HOSTS first, which queries IP too (like all else does) which uses means a DNS server program uses hosts as PRIMARY RESOLVER by default too, since it rides on the OS using IP, which uses HOSTS first!

THIS one I'd like to know the answer too, & if it's how I think it is in theory alone? It shuts your ass DOWN, yet again, fool... lol! apk

"I do it on the /etc/hosts level on my dns server. You can find large lists of ad domains that can be added to your hosts file with 127.0.0.1 or 0.0.0.0 to cause them to fail. This covers all machines on your network that use your dns server. The one I use is http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... [mvps.org] however they have become slow with updating it. You might want to invest some time in looking for one that is updated more frequently." - by qwertyatwork (668720) on Sunday March 17, @10:39AM (#43196749)

Guess what? Since DNS rides on the IP stack, then that would work on THEIR END TOO (most likely, but ask them)... it all rides on IP, & hosts are queried FIRST, before anything else BY DEFAULT, dumbass...

APK

P.S.=> However, I've *ALWAYS* been rather curious about that... you said they work 'server-side' over @ OpenDNS? For once, you're right, for once @ least - however/again:

That DNS server program?

Guess what??

It TOO, RIDES on an OS, that queries DNS first, which queries IP too (like all else does) which uses hosts are PRIMARY RESOLVER by default!

Please- go for it Bouldin, let's see if I can SMOKE YOUR ASS one more time for the hell of it, lol...

Lord knows I have TONS of times here already shown here (along with the BULLSHIT you pull http://it.slashdot.org/comment... denying valid technical citations galore, you of ALL /.'ers, "Mr.Citiation" himself RUNS from citations? LOL, please)... apk

If you block ads with the MVPS hosts file, they use none of your bandwidth at all.
I've set up my local DNS server with it, both at home and at work, and scripted a weekly update.
I forget how well it works until I have to use a system somewhere that doesn't have it.
And sorry about the loss of revenue, but I'm not having all that malware thrown at my system.

Using noscript does lead to some compatibility/useability issues, as a lot of the interactive crap built into websites works via calling scripts from other sites. There is an option in the noscript toolbar button to temporarily enable scripts from individual sites. By carefully allowing temp loading of scripts from (non-social media) partner or CDN domains, usually most of the functionality can be regained, while still not loading the tracking scripts from social media sites.

For the /etc/hosts part, there is a tutorial that covers multiple operating systems here. Another alternate hosts file, minus the turorial part, can be found here.

I just did a bit of digging, and found this article, which indicates that post-2004 models of the 4000 retain their F-Lock state during a reboot. I just tested mine out by unplugging and replugging mine, and it does indeed seem to remember the state.

So, it seems you may have a earlier model than mine, which I think is perhaps five years old. The next time you buy one, it should theoretically work like mine does.

hosts mvps: Blocking Unwanted Connections with a Hosts File

From 12 reputable & reliable known sources in the security community.

APK

P.S.=> http://hosts-file.net/hphosts-...
http://hosts-file.net/ad_serve...
http://mirror1.malwaredomains....
http://someonewhocares.org/hos...
http://www.malwaredomainlist.c...
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho...
http://www.malwareurl.com/
http://www.malware.com.br/cgi/...
http://hostsfile.org/Downloads...
http://hostsfile.mine.nu/hosts...
http://pgl.yoyo.org/as/serverl... ... apk

I not only have keft Facebook, I am actively blocking it, Using pdnsd as my DNS server, I have added the following:

neg {
name=facebook.com;types=domain;
name=fbcdn.net;types=domain;
name=fbcdn.com;types=domain;
name=fb.com;types=domain;
}

And besides being able to block facebook, I also use mvps that I add to it with a little bit of scripting.
A third plus is that the domains that my provider is required to block are still available.

jailbreak your device and change the hosts file to block all ad sites. I copied this hosts file for my mac and my phone http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/ho... Doing this will block many of the ads in all the apps as well. =)

I use this plus Adblock.

I have a 1.5/.25Mbps DSL. Ads really hurt my internet experience and they never advertise anything of value, either. Complete waste of bandwidth.

I'd get faster, but ATT and Comcast have already drilled my ass enough.

When the asshole ISPs here in the States start offering Industrialized World quality service instead of this Third World shit, then I'll consider getting better service.

And don't get me started on their "packages", "deals" and other skanky business shit they pull.

I just run my own DNS server pdnsd because it is easy to configure. That way I have access to sites that are blocked otherwise by law (Torrent sites) and I do not give Google even more information then what they already get.

I can also easily add the domains from mvps and others to block. Bit of scripting and it is done.

Cyptowall was recently being distributed by yahoo ads via a compromised flash ad

That's why my hosts file includes these entries (among many others):

127.0.0.1 count.3721.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 yahooads.valuead.com
127.0.0.1 yahoo.nuggad.net
127.0.0.1 agyahooag.112.2o7.net
127.0.0.1 yahoo.ivwbox.de
127.0.0.1 adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 ae.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 au.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 cn2.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 hk.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 in.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 us.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 pn1.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 pn2.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 tw2.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 a.analytics.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 y.analytics.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 srv1.wa.marketingsolutions.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 srv2.wa.marketingsolutions.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 srv3.wa.marketingsolutions.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 advision.webevents.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 ts.richmedia.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 adjax.flickr.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 nz.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 sg.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 br.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 cmk.tw.yahoo.overture.com
127.0.0.1 cn.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 tw.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 be.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 dk.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 eu-pn4.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 fr.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 nl.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 se.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 uk.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 de.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 es.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 gr.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 it.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 no.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 s.analytics.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 visit.webhosting.yahoo.com #[WebBug]
127.0.0.1 geo.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 cm.tw.overture.com #[cm.tw.g.ysm.yahoo.com]
127.0.0.1 cm.west.yahoo.overture.com
127.0.0.1 cmh.tw.yahoo.overture.com
127.0.0.1 cmx.tw.yahoo.overture.com
127.0.0.1 ad.antventure.com #[any-world.ngd.ysm.yahoodns.net]
127.0.0.1 ar.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 ca.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 cookex.amp.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 launch.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 mx.adserver.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 o.analytics.yahoo.com
127.0.0.1 z.analytics.yahoo.com