Slashdot Mirror

Everyone knows the best programmer alive is Bill Brasky!.

The late 'Joan Veon' did quite a bit of work researching the UN takeover plans. Never seen this detail of information available anywhere else.

Anyone interested should watch some of her videos (that are still available) which show the structure of these different groups from top to bottom in a detailed way.

Here are some links to get you started in understanding the bigger picture:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=504526035342184251/
http://youtube.com/watch?v=vEJdeWvGIZU/
http://www.womensgroup.org/videos.htm/
http://www.youtube.com/embed/7oKs35vrPAQ/
http://www.goldmanbanksters.com/heroes/joan-veon/
http://kingmannafta.com/Veon.aspx/
http://www.mefeedia.com/watch/29262016/
http://www.veoh.com/watch/v415828EXyCxeTm/

(ignore the random religious stuff offered unless you believe in such, which given the current state of world affairs wouldn't be hard)

Monsanto are one of the largest investors of this elaborate project, and anyone who has studied Monsanto knows that Monsanto is NOT TO BE TRUSTED.

They take absolutely every chance they get to strengthen their death-grip on international agriculture, if we give them an inch they will take a mile. This is about world domination of agriculture.

They always sell their modified crap as being greatly beneficial and liberating to the poor farmers, when in reality they are shackling third world countires to rely on first-world corporations to produce food. Total enslavement.

"When you control the oil, you control the county. When you control the food, you control the population" - Henry Kissenger

Please people, open your mind and consider the history of Monsanto and the other groups involved in this project - we cannot afford to allow things like this to happen. Monsanto's seed is designed to produce only a single yield, and is modified to withstand the poisonous pesticides they produce; they have a very elaborate marketing machine working to deceive poor farmers across the globe to buy into this rip-off, this rabbit whole goes quite deep and when you get to the bottom of it, it's a total travesty that words can scarcely describe. If ever there was an organization worthy of the moniker "Evil Corporation" it would be Monsanto.

I implore you all to take the time to watch the documentary The World According to Monsanto and follow the claims up with your own research - only when you have verified the length and breadth of the crimes against humanity commited by this corporation will you understand the gravity of what is transpiring. These people are presenting enslavement as a solution, seeking to rule us with an iron fist in a velvet glove - we must be vigilant to avoid deception.

Double bullshit, all you have is the fucking straw man argument, "Carter was once wrong so arguments about resource exhaustion are always wrong, lets go have a beer."

http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/activism_non_profit/watch/v20018168hpFeebj3

It is only simple math.

You'd think that if Israel were behind the attack, they would realize they'd be the prime suspect, but I can't fathom why they would want to advertise it. A blackhat hobbyist might, because they're looking for some sort of "look at how smart I am" personal credit, whereas that seems less likely for a government to do.

The embedded references could just as easily have been planted by someone unaffiliated with Israel, who also knew that Israel would be the prime suspect, and wanted to lead some trail to them. Meaning, if you didn't think the culprit was Israel beforehand, you shouldn't think so now. (Mind you, it probably *was* Israel, but that was already the prevailing theory.)

It's sort of like this.

Even if we didn't do it, it's happening. Even if it isn't happening, pollution and landfill are still major problems we have to solve. Oil is still going to run out.

This is a huge opportunity. People developing green forms of power generation, better recycling methods and more efficient devices stand to make a fortune selling them to the rest of the world. It also saves us money on petrol and waste disposal services (i.e. local taxes).

hmmz well have a wee look at this, in general it's about recycling however at 21:45 it specifically goes on about lanfills. you might find it very interesting indeed.

seems from this that recycling, apart from tin, isn't the benefit most people think and is generally worse environmentally than making from scratch
Penn and Teller's Bullshit on recycling
Lanfills also can be used, as seen here to help generate power from the gases in it. it gets tapped and voila.. a groovy source of electricity.

if i have got you wrong on what you meant about lanbdfills then sorry bud, howevere it's worth a watch anyways.

Of course, the Stooges would do a better job.....we have the video to prove it. The episode is called "A Plumbing We Will Go" ... http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/comedy/watch/v19300171xgF4NR2J

It immediately reminded me of the "fusion" technology from Invader Zim:

http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/entertainment/watch/v18528014rFw5AbSe

(skip to around 6:45)

When I read the headline, I thought of this retired nurse who provides instructional videos on suicide using a plastic bag and inert gas.

Instructional Video
Betty is a nurse educator. In this video she describes how to make a simple plastic Exit bag. This film forms part of a series on the use of an Exit bag from The Peaceful Pill Handbook available from www.peacefulpill.com

What's up with the fighter jets that sat in a cave like 1,000 years and started up just fine? The ancient walkie-talkie's with working batteries?

Why not? It worked for Woody Allen.

It's probably where the Scientologists got the idea.

Nice video -- at long last the Ftn' Irish have a music video that matches up to USC!
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/music/watch/e1131685gpf3GfW

Now if only we could lick 'em on the field!
537

Sorry if someone else posted this: The World According To Monsanto

A worthy parable isThe Passion of St Tibulus.

Down with that sort of thing.

You want free videos:

http://www.tioti.com/
http://quicksilverscreen.com/
http://www.veoh.com/
http://www.hulu.com/
http://www.alluc.org/
http://www.sidereel.com/_home
http://alloftv.net/
http://www.4kidstv.com/

I haven't checked them all but most of them I checked were legal, and Quicksilverscreen and TIOTI are people that share their videos via the web site that may be grayware and not 100% legal but it is like them taping a VHS tape and sharing it with you.

here is a link to tens of thousands of free music links mostly by third party artists who don't have a distributor and share their music via the Internet.

If you are going to use BitTorrent why not find free and legal torrents to use with it and avoid the piracy.

Funny, I thought pirates disliked it when people made money off of pirated material. Oh well, I guess not. It was actually a really good news story. Everyone can watch it here: http://www.veoh.com/collection/CBS-60-Minutes/watch/v19306351MbfMTNw4

What a crock. Objectively biased, and subjectively a crock of shit.

http://www.veoh.com/collection/CBS-60-Minutes/watch/v19306351MbfMTNw4

Watch starting at 4:25:

"Gee whiz technology called Bit - torrent"

This shows who is influencing the discussion on piracy, and how the movie industry is trying to demonize it by that woman Leslie Stall acting shocked and appalled at everything "He brought his CHILDREN to the theatre while committing this crime?" [taping a movie at the theatre]. Comparing pirates to drug dealers, child sex freaks, etc. The one credit the report has is that it mentioned that Bittorrent clients are legal. Also, some director guy admitted that the only thing that can be done in the fight against piracy is to slow it down; it's not a winnable war for the movie industry.

Just thought it was a really shitty show that deserved mentioning. Andy Rooney was spot on in his article, though.

70 years ago we didn't pollute ANYWHERE as much as we do today.

actually i think you will find that there was FAR more CO2 output then.

funnily enough ths is according to Bjorn Lomborg , the chap who wrote the book "the sceptical environmentalist", he also did a video presentation it find someof his videos here, he's very good and cuts through much of the FUD

Veho link to a critique of the man made global warming theory(and inconvenient truth. the great global warming conspiracy),us congressional testimoney 2007, then here ,then here and then we have his site right here and finally Penn and Teller on environmental hysteria, they have quite the crack research team
now you sir, are being rude and patronising and also very presumptuous. you have to recognise the FUD and also that there are rather a lot of people making rather a lot of money out of the environmental "movement".

i would also propose that it is also a fact that human c02 emissions are far less than those from volcanoes and c02 is actually not a major greenhouse gas when compared to the emissions(methane,ethane,propane and butane) from bovine animals, termites, and various other natural sources of greenhouse gases.

now ,yes, we contribute but only to part of a natural cycle and there IS a natrural cycle.

Bjorn is not alone in making these statements of fact and is backed by many other people in this field.

as i said, all i could call you is rude, presumptuous and closed minded

70 years ago we didn't pollute ANYWHERE as much as we do today.

actually i think you will find that there was FAR more CO2 output then.

funnily enough ths is according to Bjorn Lomborg , the chap who wrote the book "the sceptical environmentalist", he also did a video presentation it find someof his videos here, he's very good and cuts through much of the FUD

Veho link to a critique of the man made global warming theory(and inconvenient truth. the great global warming conspiracy),us congressional testimoney 2007, then here ,then here and then we have his site right here and finally Penn and Teller on environmental hysteria, they have quite the crack research team
now you sir, are being rude and patronising and also very presumptuous. you have to recognise the FUD and also that there are rather a lot of people making rather a lot of money out of the environmental "movement".

i would also propose that it is also a fact that human c02 emissions are far less than those from volcanoes and c02 is actually not a major greenhouse gas when compared to the emissions(methane,ethane,propane and butane) from bovine animals, termites, and various other natural sources of greenhouse gases.

now ,yes, we contribute but only to part of a natural cycle and there IS a natrural cycle.

Bjorn is not alone in making these statements of fact and is backed by many other people in this field.

as i said, all i could call you is rude, presumptuous and closed minded

Um, almost all of the population has a "dominant eye" with a very small fraction having no ocular dominance at all [wikipedia.org]. I haven't had the chance to demo any of these technologies but if you're asserting that ocular dominance renders them useless then I think Sony's market is drastically small. I'm not an optometrist but are you saying you experience ocular dominance far more than the average person? To a debilitating extent?

--
Surgeon General's Warning: Reading this post may cause death [veoh.com].

I'm posting this story and this here because I see a very important trend. Not only the convergence of the Internet and TV. But the passiveness of TV being replaced with a more active process. these two simply reenforce that but from the "my computer is a TV" rather than the aforementioned "my TV is a computer".

Methinks you're behind on your software versions: http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16290942FhfBbDSy

Remember high school when you knew more about computers than the teacher? Your kids will cope, make sure they have access to some goo material and make sure they don't poke their eyes out, you will be good.

Here is a video of a talk of Jeri Ellsworth, a prominent hardware hacker of the Commodore/Amiga community (she designed those 30 in one Commodore 64 joystick games), she gives a little insight on her childhood:

http://www.veoh.com/videos/e155710Q6md6hn3

Essentially if you have the interest and resources a lot of the other stuff will take care of itself.

As long as Judge Reinhold is involved!

You know youtube posts all its; stuff in even tinier than hell 320x240 resolution at a partly 300kbit encoding bandwidth.

Even though almost every other site uses better video quality people are still stuck on youtube. Hell I see people attaching music to a single image so they can upload it to youtube and share their favourite tracks - all that effort when there's sites like imeem.com that let you post and share the mp3's, and do it legally.

So, viacom has added one more media site to the mix.

Apple spoke about multithreading in last year's WWDC "Mac OS X State of the Union" session. Apple provided a recording of that session (among two others) for free though iTunes. Since they're free, I uploaded a short clip. Once Veoh encoded that video, it will be available at http://www.veoh.com/videos/v801272G85gFFER.

Some market regulation is good and some market regulation is bad. I agree with regulating hygiene standards in restaurants because I don't want to get food poisoning. Yes, it makes work harder and costs more for restaurant owners, but it's something the vast majority want regulated. I also agree with building standard regulations including things like a requirement for hardwired smoke alarms in multiple occupancy buildings (A UK thang, not sure what kind of regs the US has for that) because it forces a situation where, for the example given, if there was a fire, people have an in-built warning system. Yes, architects and building owners will have to make considerations and concessions on the design of a structure and fork out more to install said fire alarms (plus extinguishers, thick doors with intumescent seals, etc), but so be it.

Regulation of the Internet when it comes to Net Neutrality is something I also agree with. Yes, it makes things harder and costs more for the businesses that provide backbone services, etc, but if big businesses are given control of what goes through their tubes, then, well, there will be consequences such as limitations on free speech online, as hey, it's their system and they can simply take it home with them if they get upset.

Over regulation is bad as well as it leads to authoritarianism, but a minimal amount to make the world a better place is better than none at all.

What about veoh? Where, by the way, you can see more original shows like The House Between.

What about veoh? Where, by the way, you can see more original shows like The House Between.

Business / Internet video

The trouble with YouTube
Aug 31st 2006 | SAN FRANCISCO
From The Economist print edition

It attracts a lot of viewers, but can “user-generated” video make money?

“STARBUCKS has comfy chairs, but they don’t charge people for sitting in them,” says Tom McInerney, the boss and co-founder of Guba, an internet-video company. Instead, he explains, Starbucks provides a comfortable environment, at considerable expense, so that people will buy overpriced coffee. That, in essence, is the business model being pursued by websites that host “user-generated content” such as personal blogs, photographs and today’s craze, amateur videos, which can be uploaded and watched on sites such as YouTube, Google Video, MySpace, Guba, Veoh and Metacafe. By offering a setting for free interaction, such sites provide the online equivalent of comfy chairs. The trouble is that, so far, there is no equivalent of the overpriced coffee that brings in the money and pays the bills.

IMAGE: Head and shoulders above the rest, for now (AP)

That is why people like Chad Hurley and Steven Chen (pictured), the co-founders of YouTube, the clear leader of the pack by audience size, are casting around for a business model. Aware that inserting advertisements at the beginning of video clips, as some sites do, is annoying and risks driving away YouTube’s users, Mr Hurley and Mr Chen have announced two experiments with advertising, with the promise of more to come. One idea is for “brand channels” in which corporate customers create pages for their own promotional clips. Warner Brothers Records, a music label, led the way, setting up a page to promote a new album by Paris Hilton. The second experiment is “participatory video ads”, whereby advertisements can be uploaded and then rated, shared and tagged just like amateur clips. This “encourages engagement and participation,” the company declares.

Even as advertisers evaluate these new ideas, however, YouTube and the other video-sharing sites face other difficulties. For one thing, they are in a no-man’s land of copyright law: they promise to pull pirated content from their sites when asked to do so, but it is only a matter of time before one of them is hit with a big lawsuit. Then there are the costs of running such a site—video requires a lot of bandwidth and storage. A rival estimates that YouTube is losing more than $500,000 a month.

Putting paid-for advertisements alongside amateur video clips, perhaps based on keywords or tags, poses another problem. “How do you know the guy in a video doesn’t make a racial slur?” asks Mr McInerney. Many firms will be cautious about letting an automatic system—such as, say, Google’s AdSense—place their ads next to user-generated clips of unknown provenance and with potentially embarrassing contents. (Even so, Guba is testing AdSense for Video, which has not yet been officially launched.)

For its part, Guba is betting on a combination of advertising plus the sale and rental of commercial video material. Its site offers both free amateur videos and paid-for content, including films from Sony and Warner Brothers. When Guba cut its prices last week, allowing new films to be downloaded for $9.99 and older ones for $4.99, its sales jumped tenfold. Google Video also allows content owners to charge for video. This suggests that internet-video sites are on a collision course with DVD-rental outfits, such as Netflix, which are moving towards the delivery of films via the

This one does: http://www.veoh.com/

Gotta register and turn your content filter off to view it, but there's some seriously sweet pr0n in their adult category

One of the few sites that I have found that support both flash 7 and 8 thats worth checking out is http://www.veoh.com/

don't forget about these guys: http://veoh.com/team.php