Slashdot Mirror


Senior Navy Official Slams Microsoft

Here is a short article which indicates that the Navy is not happy with Microsoft. One paragraph: "There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience." ("He" is Undersecretary of the Navy Jerry MacArthur Hultin.)

273 comments

  1. r33t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KEWL A NAVY DOOD BASH MS!11!!!1!1
    WINDOWZ SUX0RZ DICK LINUCKS RULE!!!!!!111111111111

    1. Re:r33t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get fucked.

    2. Re:r33t! by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I think you should go to Jeff K.'s site. You'll find him cool, I'm sure.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  2. care factor=0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oooooooh a big bad navy guy has something negative to say about MS!
    get a life rob

    1. Re:care factor=0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

      News on Slashdot (taken from ultramode.txt)

      Blah blah Microsoft Sucks blah blah
      (repeat 30x)

      Seriously. I'm getting TIRED of all the negative stories posted about MS. How many times do we need to point out their flaws? We know they're a crappy company putting out crappy software, but do we have to post stories about those who don't like them? Is this even really news now?

      I think I'm about ready to filter out Microsoft stories, period. Oh wait, that won't work here, because this is a story posted under "United States".

      Robin, michael, emmett, HeUnique, get a life. I don't even see Rob or Hemos posting these kinds of stories anymore. The quality of these stories posted is sub-tabloid, and degrades Slashdot as a whole.

    2. Re:care factor=0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speak for yourself Luser. At this moment I have 7 computers in my appartment, in various stages of canibalization. 4 of them are fully functional. 2 of those 4 are multiprocessor boxen. none of them run any microsoft software. Not even the MS frontpage extensions for apache. I got OpenBSD on my laptop, Linux on my dual p3 desktop, and SCO on my DEC (nothing else supports the coralary C bus)

    3. Re:care factor=0 by chez69 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. guys, the microsoft sucks stories are getting old. You have other choices, use them if you don't like microsoft.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  3. woohoo ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, another ms bashing article, I didn't know what was missing.

    1. Re:woohoo ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a MS-bashing article? Ok. I'm imagining the PR staff and firms are working overtime this weekend and Mr. Gates plugging up a leaking dam with his finger before it breaks; unfortunately, the concrete all around him is cracking and spraying at high pressure due to the development from above. Balmar tries to help by plugging his thumb up Gates' ass, but its too late. Gates yells, "Oh shit!" The situation is rather grim and the foundation is quaking. Its a matter of time before the closed source market model collapses. Many stick around in support and yell at those who run, "traitors!" Its hopeless. Game over. Its over, man!

    2. Re:woohoo ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL! If I had any moderation points, I'd moderate this one to VERY FUNNY!

  4. LINUX IS KOOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY NME IS JOSH AND I AM A LINIS SYSTMS ADMISTRINATOR. I LIKE LINUX. MY BROTHER INSTALLED LINXU ON MY COMPUTER. ATFIRST I WAS MAD BECAUSE I COULDNT PLAY THE WINDOWS GAME WITH LINUX AND ALL IT DID WAS ASK FOR LOGIN. BUT THEN I LIKE LINUS BECAUSE MY BROTHER SHOWS ME HOW TO LOOK AT PICTURES OF NAKED GIRLS WITH NETSCAPE AND I CANT DO THAT WITH WINDOWS. I LIKE TO LOOK AT NAKED GIRLS EVEN THOUGH I KNOW THAT GIRLS HAVE COOTIES. THATS WHY I WANT A STONE GIRL SO SHE WONT GIVE ME COOTIES AND I CAN TOUCH HER BUTTOKCS.I LIKE LINUX.. PLEASE SEND ME WAREXZ

    1. Re:LINUX IS KOOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plz send nekked dogsex pics to josh31337@aol.com

  5. BUT d00d! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its MS bashing,and thats like really r33t or something!

  6. Moderators, please rate above post as offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, we don't like smartasses around here, join the troll fest, or go to some smartass weblog.
    We don't post intelligent looking stuff on lame articles like this.

    1. Re:Moderators, please rate above post as offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I opened this article hoping to see some sort of canonical listing of competing products.

      Instead, the moron moderators are again letting the trolls appear. There's so much stuff that should be -1, and not a single moderator has time to drop his dick.

      I'll nominate the bong-shong-along post for a -1.

  7. Under attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Duty Watch: Sir, incoming enemy fighter off the port side, anti-ship missle locked!

    Captain: Ensign, take down that plane!

    Ensign's keyboard: Start > Programs > MSanti-aircraft > portside

    Ensign's monitor: "portside" requires SP4"

  8. what you meant to post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience.

    Ok then, give some shareware developer out there an early christmas present and buy his software. If not, then basically...shutup. Or was he hoping to get some beanie points by bashing Microsoft?

    BTW, has he not been looking into Windows 2000?

  9. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, i think it was a 30days trial version which had expired

  10. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The link in that old piece is broken.

    You want http://www.gcn.com/archives/gc n/1998/july13/cov2.htm

  11. Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using lotus notes and MS outlook and believe it lotus SUCKS to name a few... 1. Most unpredictable inconsistant user interface To me an hour to find the reply all button, worse a notes devloper couldn't find it most people just copied the receipient list. (do you?) 2. Bloated with all kinds of legacy code (65MB client!) 3. Slow. Lotus notes 5 is the worst product i have ever seen. No wonder companies are shifting to M$ for their groupware concerns. Is there any GPL'd Groupware around, is there some one working on it. Its time we had one.

    1. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me an hour to find out how to flush the toilet, finally I bailed it out with my coffee mug.

    2. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notes is a complex piece of software. You would have to see it in a business environment implemented correctly and learn how to use it!

    3. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Strange... With R5, you'd find it by clicking the Reply button and select Reply to All. A whole hour, hunh?

      Aw, give the guy a break! He's probably an MSCE, so it's no wonder he couldn't figure it out. Microsoft doesn't teach anything about the competition's products, or hasn't anybody told you that? MSCEs can't figure anything out if it isn't written in the MSCE manual.

    4. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey dipshit, you ever looked into m$ api's?

      m$ have access to their own unpublished api's which make their own stuff comparatively slick, and everyone else has to chug all around the block with a bunch of crap which is deliberately designed to hold everyone back. the fact that lotus works on m$ at all is a miracle of patience and persistence.

      the d.o.j. should make m$ publish their api's. then you'd see competitive software work really well.

    5. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I didn't realize there are ppl who love an extra step while replying a mail! Try both Notes and Exchange (Outl@@k). If you haven't used either... keep quiet.

      Notes UI sucks big time.

    6. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Reid · · Score: 1

      I rarely laugh out loud at posts, but this one got me. Probably because it included the word "toilet".

    7. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by chez69 · · Score: 1

      the word here is "correct" notes, like all software products (including linux, BSD, and windows) when implemented correctly works great.

      the "correct" part is the most difficult part =-)

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    8. Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Logan+Bear · · Score: 1
      To me an hour to find the reply all button, worse a notes devloper couldn't find it most people just copied the receipient list.

      Strange... With R5, you'd find it by clicking the Reply button and select Reply to All. A whole hour, hunh?

  12. greetings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't know where to post this. so i'm posting it here. i came to read slashdot about a month because several peers of mine said i would enjoy it. they were 49% correct. i enjoy any article that dosen't touch the topic of an O/S. i am not going to say what i personally run, could it be the freshest linux kernal...or the freshest windows build...the world will never know. what they will know, and probably not care, is that this entity known as slashdot is slowly losing all value as it turns into a linuxuser vs. msuser forum. wow. just what we needed. the computer world fighting each other in it's prime development stage. what you people don't realize is that both OS's are pretty much lame. any OS is lame out of the box. it's up to the specific user to cater his OS, and tailor it around him. rodney king said it, and I the anonymous coward state it loud and proud. who gives a shit what OS you run as long as you are enjoying it and getting the most out of it. thank you, anonymous coward slackware user who just so happens to not discredit windows. it's not the brush, it's the artist.

    1. Re:greetings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go join AOL and chat about Brittney Spears and Ricky Martin with the other kiddies? "Oh, Friends is my favorite show." 'Oh my god, mine too! Aren't they funny?'

    2. Re:greetings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way is Litestep a 'mock wm effect'?

      shell=litestep.dll

    3. Re:greetings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shell=c:\litestep\litestep.exe

    4. Re:greetings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Here I discount grits/natalie portman trolls - browse at 0 if you don't want to see these).

      I happen to know the guy who posts those grits/natalie portman messages: He works for Micro~1 and Billy Goats pays him just to infiltrate intelligent sites like SlashDot with his stuff, thinking it will choke the server. You see, Billy Goats really has no idea what a server running on REAL software like Apache/Linux can do.

    5. Re:greetings by datazone · · Score: 1

      don't make me laugh little boy.
      litestep is nice and all, but it is VERY weak, when compared to most *nix WindowManagers...

      When you grow up, come back to the party, until then, play with your toys.

      --
      Its spelt "L-I-N-U-X", but pronunced as "Free Beer"
    6. Re:greetings by divec · · Score: 2

      > slashdot is [turning into] a linuxuser vs msuser forum.

      I don't agree. Many people here are very angry at MS for forcing shoddy software onto them for many years (via OEM sales, illegal monopoly activities etc.) and see linux as the first genuine choice for a long time. So naturally some people react (over-)violently to anti-linux FUD. But in general most posters give an informative statement of their informed opinion. Articles like this are an exception rather than a rule.

      There are a lot of knowledgeable people here who lucidly expound their arguments. Try finding a similar level of informed discussion on a pro-MS site. (Here I discount grits/natalie portman trolls - browse at 0 if you don't want to see these).

      --

      perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    7. Re:greetings by kaball · · Score: 1

      Umm what exactly can i do to "tailor" windows? Huh?... Get the src and hack it to my preferances? I think not. The only thing i could do is either use litestep for a mock wm effect =P, or *shudder* buy M$ Plus or something to add some lame feature to a powerless OS. No the only way to go is GNU/Linux or BSD.

      --
      ctrl+shift+S
  13. Re:Best Endeavour contracts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the army bloke

    Why do you keep saying army? He is the undersecretary of the Navy.

  14. Official Navy Homo gets sucked by Roblimo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

    1. Re:Official Navy Homo gets sucked by Roblimo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont suck a dick too bad yourself, Anal Coward.

  15. Re:I'm back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck you

  16. SlashDot rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" wow

  17. Trolls above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and below Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  18. blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah blah Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

    1. Re:blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your posts are precisely why parents need to supervise their children while using the internet.

  19. yada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yada yada blah blah blah blah

  20. dick suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and below Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  21. dick suckers - ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  22. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck d Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  23. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck di Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  24. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dic Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  25. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dick Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  26. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dick - p Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  27. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dick - pe Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  28. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dick - pen Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  29. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dick - peni Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  30. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dick - penis Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  31. dick suckers - ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you suck dick - penis lips Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!"

  32. YEAH, STICK IT TO THE MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah

  33. Re:Will IBM play its Linux trump card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, right, like IBM wants the nightmare of a huge linux installed base. "You want it to what? Oh wow, we'll have to write a driver for that." Why deal with that when there's a ton of MCSEs to send out for every little problem.

  34. Natalie Portman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls! Natalie Portman Ate My Balls!

  35. Re:We need to supply information to other buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean "navy guy"

  36. Re:WITNESS: MY SHLONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, Peewee, 3 inches is NOT considered big

  37. wow cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by moeffju (m4ward@gmx.net) on Saturday February 12, @07:37AM EST (#13) (User Info) http://www.moeffju.de/ Before they sent out a ship carrying a Division-By-Zero WinNT steering server, and before buying the Microsoft Groupware products. As it's now, not that I like Microsoft, but this seems just as if the Navy was too stupid to test their software before buying. Signatures are for wimps! [ Reply to This | Parent ] BUT d00d! by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @07:39AM EST Best Endeavour contracts by divec (Score:2) Saturday February 12, @08:07AM EST Re:Best Endeavour contracts by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @08:34AM EST The Emperor has no clothes (Score:2) by Get Behind the Mule on Saturday February 12, @07:41AM EST (#15) (User Info) I think the anti-trust suit may have finally stripped M$ of its aura of invincibility in the public eye. For a long time, Joe Random Public thought that the world's largest software company must be just the greatest, particulary if J.R.P. never had the opportunity to see software from any other company. This is still true of a lot of people today, but I think that the general public is finally catching on to the astonishing idea that M$ may actually suck. Many of those in charge of procurement in the military may have known this for a long time. But it may have only recently become possible for someone like this guy to say so in public. So, what Linux groupware products can we turn the Navy on to? Always keep a sapphire in your mind [ Reply to This | Parent ] he's silly (Score:2) by TummyX on Saturday February 12, @07:43AM EST (#16) (User Info) There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience.

    Ok then, give some shareware developer out there an early christmas present and buy his software. If not, then basically...shutup. Or was he hoping to get some beanie points by bashing Microsoft?

    BTW, has he not been looking into Windows 2000? [ Reply to This | Parent ] what you meant to post by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @07:46AM EST thanks n/t by TummyX (Score:2) Saturday February 12, @07:50AM EST Re: arg html by TummyX (Score:2) Saturday February 12, @07:48AM EST Re: arg html by Skinka (Score:1) Saturday February 12, @07:56AM EST cunning by TummyX (Score:1) Saturday February 12, @08:06AM EST Re: arg html by Fishstick (Score:1) Saturday February 12, @09:03AM EST Shareware groupware products by divec (Score:2) Saturday February 12, @08:00AM EST I've looked at Win2000... by NatePWIII (Score:1) Saturday February 12, @08:40AM EST Under attack (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @07:45AM EST (#18) Duty Watch: Sir, incoming enemy fighter off the port side, anti-ship missle locked! Captain: Ensign, take down that plane! Ensign's keyboard: Start > Programs > MSanti-aircraft > portside Ensign's monitor: "portside" requires SP4" [ Reply to This | Parent ] ITs about time (Score:1) by kaball (gotrooted@redmond.org) on Saturday February 12, @07:57AM EST (#24) (User Info) Microsoft has been consistantly making low quality software.I for one think the way their products make people expect less out of their software is unacceptable.I mean they have the public thinking system crashes are a "normal" part of operation. This my only be my opinion but we could all benefit if more people "told it like it is".THis being that microsoft cares nothing about quality and thats proven by me using it and expiriencing it for myself.So all you M$ "experts" can stuff that in your pipe and smoke it. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Will IBM play its Linux trump card? (Score:1) by ozbird on Saturday February 12, @08:06AM EST (#29) (User Info) This would seem to be an ideal opportunity for IBM to offer a Linux solution in addition to the previously safe Microsoft "solution"? Sure, it probably won't be successful this time around (bureaucracy has more inertia than an aircraft carrier...) but it shows that they are serious about Linux and that they are listening to what the customer wants. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Will IBM play its Linux trump card? by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @08:51AM EST Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:09AM EST (#31) I have been using lotus notes and MS outlook and believe it lotus SUCKS to name a few... 1. Most unpredictable inconsistant user interface To me an hour to find the reply all button, worse a notes devloper couldn't find it most people just copied the receipient list. (do you?) 2. Bloated with all kinds of legacy code (65MB client!) 3. Slow. Lotus notes 5 is the worst product i have ever seen. No wonder companies are shifting to M$ for their groupware concerns. Is there any GPL'd Groupware around, is there some one working on it. Its time we had one. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Logan Bear (Score:1) Saturday February 12, @08:26AM EST Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @09:01AM EST greetings (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:09AM EST (#32) i don't know where to post this. so i'm posting it here. i came to read slashdot about a month because several peers of mine said i would enjoy it. they were 49% correct. i enjoy any article that dosen't touch the topic of an O/S. i am not going to say what i personally run, could it be the freshest linux kernal...or the freshest windows build...the world will never know. what they will know, and probably not care, is that this entity known as slashdot is slowly losing all value as it turns into a linuxuser vs. msuser forum. wow. just what we needed. the computer world fighting each other in it's prime development stage. what you people don't realize is that both OS's are pretty much lame. any OS is lame out of the box. it's up to the specific user to cater his OS, and tailor it around him. rodney king said it, and I the anonymous coward state it loud and proud. who gives a shit what OS you run as long as you are enjoying it and getting the most out of it. thank you, anonymous coward slackware user who just so happens to not discredit windows. it's not the brush, it's the artist. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:greetings by kaball (Score:1) Saturday February 12, @08:15AM EST Re:greetings by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @08:45AM EST doing the math (Score:1) by dermond on Saturday February 12, @08:26AM EST (#35) (User Info) ok. let's assume that you have 600 000 ppl working for you who need some software product A and it costs you only $10 per seat and year.(where of course most software will cost you some aditional $100 because it only runs on operating system A-doze and an additional $100 on average for necessary hardware upgrade etc..) but let us assume just $10 for product A. that gives 6 mill$. for this much money you can pay a dozen of full time programmes who write you a custom application that does what you want. (maybe hiring the programmes of the shareware product you like) if you open soucre that application you are not dependent on them and get additonal people working for you for free! plus: an organisation which is fianced by public taxes should give something back to the people for their money after all.. mond. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Was it just me... (Score:1) by PsychoSpunk on Saturday February 12, @08:34AM EST (#37) (User Info) Or were you wishing that there were shareware products to change the ? to the proper character? ALL HAIL BRAK!!! [ Reply to This | Parent ] Official Navy Homo gets sucked by Roblimo (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:36AM EST (#39) Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] SlashDot rules (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:38AM EST (#41) Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" wow [ Reply to This | Parent ] Trolls above (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:39AM EST (#42) and below Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] blah blah (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:39AM EST (#43) blah blah Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] yada (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:40AM EST (#44) yada yada blah blah blah blah [ Reply to This | Parent ] YEAH, STICK IT TO THE MAN! by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @08:47AM EST dick suckers (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:43AM EST (#46) and below Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:44AM EST (#47) you suck Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:44AM EST (#48) you suck d Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:44AM EST (#49) you suck di Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:44AM EST (#50) you suck dic Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:44AM EST (#51) you suck dick Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:45AM EST (#52) you suck dick - p Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:45AM EST (#53) you suck dick - pe Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:45AM EST (#55) you suck dick - pen Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:45AM EST (#56) you suck dick - peni Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:45AM EST (#57) you suck dick - penis Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] dick suckers - ha ha (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:46AM EST (#58) you suck dick - penis lips Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] In the NAVY (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 12, @08:46AM EST (#59) I WANT TO MOUNT /DEV/NATALIE/PORTMAN AND THEN FLOOD HER PORTS WITH GRITS Thanks. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Natalie Portman by Anonymous Coward Saturday February 12, @08:53AM EST

  38. this is script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    alert("Computer science classes taught me this") You can try this at home and impress your friends.

  39. So is this .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    alert("This rulz")l

    1. Re:So is this .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, are you dumb.

  40. Ugly Fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    _
    | \
    | \
    | | \
    __ | |\ \ __
    _____________ _/_/ | | \ \ _/_/ _____________
    | ___________ _/_/ | | \ \ _/_/ ___________ |
    | | _/_/_____ | | > > _/_/_____ | |
    | | /________/ | | / / /________/ | |
    | | | | / / | |
    | | | |/ / | |
    | | | | / | |
    | | | / | |
    | | |_/ | |
    | | | |
    | | c o m m u n i c a t i o n s | |
    | |_________________________________________________ _______________| |
    |_________________________________________________ ___________________|

    ...presents... Ugly Fucker
    by Mark E. Dassad
    01/01/1996-#301

    __///////\ -cDc- CULT OF THE DEAD COW -cDc- /\\\\\\\__
    \\\\\\\/ Everything You Need Since 1986 \///////
    ___ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ ___ _ _ ___
    |___heal_the_sick___raise_the_dead___cleanse_the_l epers___cast_out_demons___|

    Corey lay on his side, thin blanket pulled up over his ear, metal
    bedsprings creaking as he masturbated into a dirty sock. Surreptitiously
    watching Joey get his asshole raped. The un-challenged top dog, "Wolf," had
    been making the rounds of the dormitory at night, picking his victims from the
    smaller, paler boys. For the first time in his life, Corey was thankful he was
    so ugly.

    He _knew_ he was ugly. It wasn't a matter of goddamn "self-esteem" like
    that bogus shrink kept trying to tell him, as she looked away from his whole
    butt-ugly self. He was scrawny to the point of emaciation. He had a big nose,
    crooked buck teeth and no chin to speak of. He had zits all over his face that
    blended in with the freckles. He had frizzy black hair that looked like it had
    never been combed, which wasn't true, it just looked that way. He'd buzzed it
    off once when he was eleven, to look tough like a skinhead, but his grandma
    Rubinstein had fainted dead away when she saw it. His father had beat the
    living crap out of him for it; his mother said he looked like an Auschwitz
    survivor and made him wear a hat.

    He was so fucking ugly that his cousin Aaron didn't even make him suck his
    dick like he did his little brother Mark. Aaron, the fucking cop Aaron,
    goddamn musclehead faggot Aaron, thought he was really something special. Just
    because he was strong, pumped up, a steroid bloated idiot. Not a geeky little
    Jewish stereotype like Corey's side of the family.

    "I oughta fuck you up the ass, Corey, you ugly little shit," Aaron used to
    tell him, sitting on the faded couch in the dingy little living room in Corey's
    dark basement apartment. Corey's little brother Mark knelt between Aaron's
    legs, giving him head.

    Corey would be standing near the doorway. He didn't dare leave since
    Aaron demanded an audience. Corey knew Aaron would beat the crap out of him if
    he left, or make up some story to his old man that would get his old man to
    beat the crap out of him, or maybe both. Besides, he had liked watching that
    spoiled little shit Marky give head... it made him hard.

    "I oughta fuck you up the ass 'cause it's a lot prettier than your face."
    And then one day he did, when Corey was twelve, and Marky was seven. He made
    Mark watch. Made the little puke feel _special_, and made Corey feel even
    worse.

    The first time. Corey remembered the first time. He saw the look in
    Aaron's face, that weird crooked grin. Remembered how he tried to run, knew it
    was coming. Aaron had been talking obsessively about packing his tool up
    Corey's skinny ass for days, and somehow Corey knew he really meant it this
    time. Aaron was so fast, it was like he was that superhero "Elastic Man." His
    arm stretched across the room and grabbed Corey by the back of the neck and
    threw him face down over the coffee table.

    Aaron _laughed_ at him, as Corey shrieked and cursed. He switched to
    begging and pleading; then Aaron got Marky to pull Corey's pants down. He
    remembered Marky laughing too. High-pitched, convulsive laughter. So long
    ago, but he could still hear that laughter.

    "Watch this, buddy, I'm gonna fuck your ugly brother's ugly ass!" Aaron
    boasted. And then he did.

    Sometimes he made himself crazy, groping his memory for the rest of that
    afternoon after the initial horrible, excruciating pain when Aaron rammed his
    cock into him but he couldn't remember anything. Did his parents come home
    from work? Did he eat dinner? When did he go to bed? The next thing he
    remembered was getting up in the middle of the night with all the blood in his
    underwear. Being so scared of his mother finding the underwear, because if his
    father found out... Corey was sure he would get beaten bad enough to need to go
    to the hospital. Like the time in kindergarten when he told the teacher to
    suck his dick, after she told him to stand in the corner for talking out of
    turn. He "fell out of a tree," that time. His father would kill him if he
    knew he was getting fucked up the ass, the way he was always ranting about the
    goddamn faggots trying to take over.

    He remembered that Aaron didn't bug him or Mark for almost a month after
    the first time. But then one day, it was back to the same old routine.

    "Looks like Corey needs another butt-fucking; whatta you say, Buddy?"
    Aaron rubbed the small head bobbing between his legs.

    "Yeah, fuck his ugly butt, it's prettier than his face," Marky giggled
    around a mouthful of hard dick. The two of them howled at how clever Marky
    was, using Aaron's favorite expression.

    Once or twice a week, after that. Maybe it was better than sucking dick
    all the time. Marky had to suck dick every day, but Marky didn't seem to mind.
    It wasn't tearing up Marky's asshole and making it hurt when he crapped. Once,
    in the middle of the night, Corey crawled into Marky's bed and forced him to
    take a dick up his baby ass. Even though Corey threatened to kill Marky if he
    told anyone, Marky was smart enough to know he could just tell Aaron and Aaron
    would take care of it. And Aaron did. Corey couldn't even get near that
    memory; he didn't even want to try.

    But then there was that day when Aaron got a new idea... he only got one
    once a year. Corey remembered that day very well. Aaron held Corey down so
    Marky could stick his hard little baby dick up Corey's ass.

    It didn't _hurt_; it wasn't hardly bigger than a man's finger. His little
    brother's dick, up his ass. Too much. Too goddamn much.

    Corey was kind of proud, really. Forty-seven stab wounds between them.
    The blood was everywhere. He'd stabbed the little fucker with a butcher knife.
    In the back... jabjab to the kidneys when Marky was giving Aaron head, after
    fucking his big brother. Jabjab quick in Aaron's belly, over Marky's head,
    hard, lots of muscle. Marky went down easy, but Aaron was strong: even holding
    his gut together, he tried to act offensively.

    "Gimme the knife goddamnit you little fuckwad!"

    Corey rushed him. Stabbed him in the groin, jabjabjab, extra quick. The
    fucker fell to his knees and he stabbed him in the back as he fell forward.
    Kicked him in the butt, stabbed him through his sweatpants, fucked him with the
    butcher knife. Did he scream? Corey couldn't remember that part.

    Stabbed his little brother a dozen more times, just to be sure. Cut off
    his little dick and shoved it down his throat. Made him suck his own goddamn
    dick. A few more stabs in the chest for both of them, just to be safe. A
    strange exhilarating feeling enthralled him as he pounded the knife down.
    Overhand two-fisted strokes. Warm blood splashed his t-shirt, his face.

    He remembered he had dropped the butcher knife and casually walked the few
    blocks to the park. Down to the river to watch the ducks. He wasn't crazy.
    They deserved it.

    _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

    Corey lay on his side in bed watching Wolf rape Joey's pretty little ass.
    Juvenile cries of pain and humiliation not-quite-drowned in the pillow his face
    was smashed into. Corey imagined it was him on top of Marky as he humped his
    fist, forgetting to pretend he wasn't really watching.

    "Hey Fug," Wolf whispered, scaring Corey half-soft. That was him,
    "Fugly," "Fuckin' Ugly."

    Corey stared at Wolf through the darkness.

    "You want seconds?" Wolf whispered. He grinned at Corey through the
    darkness, kneeling between the metal beds. Glancing meaningfully at Joey's
    exposed buttocks. "I seen you watching me the last couple nights. I don't
    mind, I like an audience." He moved to creep back to his bed on the far side
    of the dormitory. "Tell him if he squeals on you he'll have to deal with me."

    Corey lay on his side for a while, breathing raggedly, his cock pulsing in
    his hand. Staring at the boy lying in the bunk next to his with shoulders
    shaking, sobbing silently. Staying low to the ground, Corey crept between the
    beds and crawled up on top of Joey. He pulled his hard, thin cock out of his
    underwear. His dick jumped as Joey let out a startled "No!" An unbearable
    excitement rising in the pit of Corey's groin as he felt the boy, only slightly
    smaller than himself. Joey tensed, spasms of fear riding up and down his body
    in waves.

    Corey thrust his cock deep into the boy's cum-wet asshole, thrilled at the
    boy's gasps of displeasure. He felt the rectum clutch instinctively, trying to
    expel his intruding dick.

    "Tell on me and I'll cut you like I cut my little brother," he threatened.
    He knew they'd all heard his story, but he didn't know if they believed it or
    not. He knew they only left him alone because he was too ugly to fuck and
    didn't have anything worth stealing.

    Well they'd know better now. He lay on top of the crying boy and he
    fucked Joey's ass. Fucked him hard, fucked him deep. He _wanted_ them to hear
    the bed creak, wanted them to hear the escaping gasps of pain from Joey.
    Wanted them all to know it was him, Fug, doing the fucking now.

    Not too ugly to do the fucking.

    Not _too_ ugly.

    .-. _ _ .-.
    / \ .-. ((___)) .-. / \
    / \ / \ .-. [ x x ] .-. / \ / \
    -/-------\-------/-----\-----/---\--\ /--/---\-----/-----\-------/-------\-
    / \ / \ / `-(' ')-' \ / \ / \
    WORLDWIDE \ / `-' (U) `-' \ / WORLDWIDE
    `-' .ooM `-' _
    Oooo / ) __
    /)(\ ( \ Copyright (c)1996 Mark E. Dassad / ( /\
    \__/ ) / All rights reserved. Award-winning CULT OF THE DEAD COW \ ) \)(/
    (_/ is published by cDc communications, P.O. Box 53011, oooO _
    oooO Lubbock, TX, 79453, US of A. Edited by Swamp Ratte'. __ ( \
    / ) /)(\ / \ ) \
    \ ( \__/ Save yourself! Go outside! Do something! \)(/ ( /
    \_) "THE COW WALKS AMONGST US" Oooo

    1. Re:Ugly Fucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OOOOH BABY! TALK DIRTY TOO ME! YEAH BOY!

  41. MoDeRaTe THiS uP!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very inciteful!

  42. Check out this new script .. it rocks the casba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > alert("The casba has been rocked");

  43. Check out this new script .. it rocks the casba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "" alert("The casba has been rocked"); ""

  44. Re:I've looked at Win2000... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Eat turds, Nate.

    -Granny

  45. Cocksmokin'! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    faq code awards privacy slashNET older stuff rob's page preferences andover.net submit story advertising supporters past polls topics about jobs hof Sections 2/7 apache 2/11 askslashdot 1/27 awards 2/11 books 2/9 bsd 2/10 features 2/11 (2) interviews 1/31 radio 2/11 (2) science 2/11 (4) yro Andover.Net AndoverNews Ask Reggie DaveCentral Freshmeat ITR Senior Navy Official Slams Microsoft Posted by Roblimo on 07:21 AM February 12th, 2000 from the bigwigs-on-the-warpath dept. Here is a short article which indicates that the Navy is not happy with Microsoft. One paragraph: "There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience." ("He" is Undersecretary of the Navy Jerry MacArthur Hultin.) So, what Linux groupware products can we turn the Navy on to? HP OpenMail or Lotus Notes for the server. What we still need is a good Lotus client for Linux. [ Reply to This | Parent ] he's silly (Score:2) by TummyX on 07:43 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#16) (User Info) There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience.

    Ok then, give some shareware developer out there an early christmas present and buy his software. If not, then basically...shutup. Or was he hoping to get some beanie points by bashing Microsoft?

    BTW, has he not been looking into Windows 2000? [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re: arg html (Score:2) by TummyX on 07:48 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#20) (User Info) why was the 'smart' html/text hybrid removed? I keep forgetting the default now is text not html :| [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re: arg html (Score:1) by Skinka (mikko.kinnunen@cs.helsinki.fi?Subject=Slashdot) on 07:56 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#23) (User Info) I keep forgetting the default now is text not html :| Then change your prefs so that html is default.. Customise Comments -> Comment post mode [ Reply to This | Parent ] cunning (Score:1) by TummyX on 08:06 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#28) (User Info) thanks :) [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re: arg html (Score:1) by Fishstick (fishstick@!YUMMYSPAM!linuxstart.com) on 09:03 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#71) (User Info) Y'know I'm not sure but it seems like it 'happened' the same day someone managed to post porno images in comments. That was fun, I'm at work skimming /. and I see some woman slurping down on some guy's giant prick. Not that I wouldn't normally enjoy seeing something like that but I also enjoy being able to pay the mortgage and buy food and stuff and my employer has a habit of firing people who browse porno at work. Just a guess, but maybe there was some hole in /. that someone found and the quickest way to stop it was to pull the html/text posting thingy. I don't display scores, comments sorted newest first, hard thresh at +1... post away! [ Reply to This | Parent ] Shareware groupware products (Score:2) by divec on 08:00 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#25) (User Info) They may be better in some respects but not overall. They may implement things that MS obviously could without any difficulty but haven't. If MS is better overall, it doesn't mean that they haven't missed out on some really obvious features that people need. [ Reply to This | Parent ] I've looked at Win2000... (Score:1) by NatePWIII (npw_npw@yahoo.com) on 08:40 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#45) (User Info) http://www.npsis.com/~nathan and I'm not impressed. Its slow unstable and possibly even a worse operating system than it predessor NT 4.0 or Win98. We were thinking of putting up an NT server for people who want frontpage extensions. Then we realized just how big of a headache it was to maintain it, and we completely dropped the whole idea. I'm not sure I understand what you mean here about looking at W2K. Actually he would be better off by not looking and at least retain that "mirage" of a superior microsoft product in his head. Nathaniel P. Wilkerson NPS Internet Solutions, LLC www.npsis.com "Get your Domain for $30" [ Reply to This | Parent ] what you meant to post (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:46 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#19) There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience. Ok then, give some shareware developer out there an early christmas present and buy his software. If not, then basically...shutup. Or was he hoping to get some beanie points by bashing Microsoft? BTW, has he not been looking into Windows 2000? [ Reply to This | Parent ] thanks n/t (Score:2) by TummyX on 07:50 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#21) (User Info) :P [ Reply to This | Parent ] A Golden Opportunity for Open Outsourcing (Score:2) by Effugas (effugas@best.com) on 09:11 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#79) (User Info) http://www.doxpara.com Federal development has a long history of public disclosure, and Open Source development is well known for providing the widest possible exposure of the codebase to security audit. The common weakness of Open Source projects is the limited bandwidth for integrating the influx of data, patches, and functionality requests. Good projects have, and need, that core group of developers to guide the flow of the code, and it's this behavior that lends legitimacy to claims of authorship long after others take over non-insignificant module implementation. This is the most concentrated point of labor in the otherwise highly distributed architecture of open code evolution. This, combined with the Federal Government's prediliction for disclosure and concerns about (national!) security, would make it advisable for at least a few government contracters to consider integrating the GPL as a key win in their official project bids. The timing is perfect: Microsoft's Worst-Case Scenario of the Sixty-Five Thousand Bug Operating System has deflated expectations of W2K considerably. Most governmental managers(decision makers) have just had a well-respected higher-up validate their employee's doubts in the "dominant paradigm". The market has fully validated Linux as a viable platform. And The Code Needs A Shepard. Why not Open Outsource? So much of the resistance to bringing in outside workers is that the internal developers aren't confident outside workers are going to meet their specific user requirements. Internal resistance would be lessened considerably if employees knew they could always fix the problems in software they were being tasked with deploying--and they'd even get to have their fixes integrated into the next release! Various departments would be able to cease redundant development; critical fixes would be integrated, experimental forks would be both possible and feasable at a low cost of exploration, and outside developments would be integrated into the central source trees based upon the strength of functionality, not force. Open Outsourcing is the answer to the question of how the code development house makes money in the essay I published some time ago, and should be considered by decision makers throughout the entire market. I was just recently working on integrating this information into my essay before the DDoS stuff hit; I'd be happy to have it ready as soon as possible if anybody wishes to take advantage of it to try to win a contract. Yours Truly, Dan Kaminsky DoxPara Research http://www.doxpara.com ==== Some people live life in the fast lane. I live life in oncoming traffic. ==== [ Reply to This | Parent ] People should be more reflective (Score:1) by Steeltoe (steeltoe@mail.com) on 07:29 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#6) (User Info) It's so typical of people to attack what they don't like, even if they would have done the same thing. The point is that it's you and me that have been fooled around by Microsoft, and then we start whining when we realize the prize to pay. It's not Microsofts fault that people are so easy to screw around, and what company won't take people's money? We should really think more about our lives and take responsibility for our own silliness. - Steeltoe [ Reply to This | Parent ] We need to supply information to other buyers (Score:2) by divec on 08:02 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#26) (User Info) One of the ways the free market operates is that feedback about goods on sale becomes public knowledge. So if a company rips one person off, they can tell everyone else before the whole market gets ripped off. As far as I can see, the army guy is just exercising this right/responsibility. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:We need to supply information to other buyers (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:58 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#66) you mean "navy guy" [ Reply to This | Parent ] Reminds me of the WinNT Ship (Score:1) by ssheth (ssheth) on 07:29 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#7) (User Info) I wonder if the Navy is still smarting over the ship on which they installed WinNT to run majority of control / steering functions. The server crashed due to some div-zero bug and the whole ship shut down -- had to be towed back to base. See http://slashdot.org/articles/9807 21/1049204.shtml for more memories. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:52 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#22) no, i think it was a 30days trial version which had expired [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:05 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#27) The link in that old piece is broken. You want http://www.gcn.com/archives/gc n/1998/july13/cov2.htm [ Reply to This | Parent ] Not to turn this into a productive conversation... (Score:1) by RatBastard (rrward@gci.KILL.ALL.SPAMMERS.NOW.net) on 07:30 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#10) (User Info) http://www.trilobite.org/ Not to turn this troll fest into a productive conversation, but anyone know what good groupware products this guy might have been referring to? Any that run on NT? (I use what the boss tells me, deal with it.) -- "I'm too sexy for my code." - Awk Sed Fred. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Not to turn this into a productive conversation (Score:1) by jck on 09:04 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#73) (User Info) He is probably talking about replacing Exchange with something like Sendmail(depending on what He meant by shareware). [ Reply to This | Parent ] Moderators, please rate above post as offtopic (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:43 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#17) Hey, we don't like smartasses around here, join the troll fest, or go to some smartass weblog. We don't post intelligent looking stuff on lame articles like this. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Moderators, please rate above post as offtopic (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:10 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#33) Yes, I opened this article hoping to see some sort of canonical listing of competing products. Instead, the moron moderators are again letting the trolls appear. There's so much stuff that should be -1, and not a single moderator has time to drop his dick. I'll nominate the bong-shong-along post for a -1. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Good value? (Score:1) by druthers on 07:32 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#11) (User Info) As a US Federal computer specialist person and a fellow taxpayer with most of the readers here, maybe I am getting good value from the money I am paying this guy! *** "It's only trivia until you need it." JMR *** [ Reply to This | Parent ] OFFTOPIC NEGATiVE UNO (-1) BiTCH! (Score:-1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on 09:00 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#68) Your post fails the troll consistency check. [ Reply to This | Parent ] They should have realized that before... (Score:1) by moeffju (m4ward@gmx.net) on 07:37 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#13) (User Info) http://www.moeffju.de/ Before they sent out a ship carrying a Division-By-Zero WinNT steering server, and before buying the Microsoft Groupware products. As it's now, not that I like Microsoft, but this seems just as if the Navy was too stupid to test their software before buying. Signatures are for wimps! [ Reply to This | Parent ] Best Endeavour contracts (Score:2) by divec on 08:07 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#30) (User Info) Big organisations rarely buy 36000 copies of a piece of shrinkwrapped software. They negotiate a contract with the software house, whereby the software house guarantees that the software will serve its purpose (e.g.) 99.9% of the time. A "best endeavour" contract says that the software house will do everything in its power to make this happen, even if it bankrupts them to do it. So the army bloke has probably got his fingers burnt in a contract like this. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Best Endeavour contracts (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:34 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#38) So the army bloke Why do you keep saying army? He is the undersecretary of the Navy. [ Reply to This | Parent ] BUT d00d! (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:39 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#14) its MS bashing,and thats like really r33t or something! [ Reply to This | Parent ] ITs about time (Score:1) by kaball (gotrooted@redmond.org) on 07:57 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#24) (User Info) Microsoft has been consistantly making low quality software.I for one think the way their products make people expect less out of their software is unacceptable.I mean they have the public thinking system crashes are a "normal" part of operation. This my only be my opinion but we could all benefit if more people "told it like it is".THis being that microsoft cares nothing about quality and thats proven by me using it and expiriencing it for myself.So all you M$ "experts" can stuff that in your pipe and smoke it. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Will IBM play its Linux trump card? (Score:1) by ozbird on 08:06 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#29) (User Info) This would seem to be an ideal opportunity for IBM to offer a Linux solution in addition to the previously safe Microsoft "solution"? Sure, it probably won't be successful this time around (bureaucracy has more inertia than an aircraft carrier...) but it shows that they are serious about Linux and that they are listening to what the customer wants. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Will IBM play its Linux trump card? (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:51 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#62) Yea, right, like IBM wants the nightmare of a huge linux installed base. "You want it to what? Oh wow, we'll have to write a driver for that." Why deal with that when there's a ton of MCSEs to send out for every little problem. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Will IBM play its Linux trump card? (Score:1) by orkysoft (`echo bexlfbsg@qqf.ay | rot13`) on 09:11 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#77) (User Info) itis://not.interesting.enough.yet/~orkysoft Hey! I want that driver for my 5.25" missile battery as well, so they'd better release it as Open Source! [ Reply to This | Parent ] doing the math (Score:1) by dermond on 08:26 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#35) (User Info) ok. let's assume that you have 600 000 ppl working for you who need some software product A and it costs you only $10 per seat and year.(where of course most software will cost you some aditional $100 because it only runs on operating system A-doze and an additional $100 on average for necessary hardware upgrade etc..) but let us assume just $10 for product A. that gives 6 mill$. for this much money you can pay a dozen of full time programmes who write you a custom application that does what you want. (maybe hiring the programmes of the shareware product you like) if you open soucre that application you are not dependent on them and get additonal people working for you for free! plus: an organisation which is fianced by public taxes should give something back to the people for their money after all.. mond. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Was it just me... (Score:1) by PsychoSpunk on 08:34 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#37) (User Info) Or were you wishing that there were shareware products to change the ? to the proper character? ALL HAIL BRAK!!! [ Reply to This | Parent ] yawn (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:23 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#1) yawn [ Reply to This | Parent ] r33t! (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:26 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#2) KEWL A NAVY DOOD BASH MS!11!!!1!1 WINDOWZ SUX0RZ DICK LINUCKS RULE!!!!!!111111111111 [ Reply to This | Parent ] I'm back! (Score:0) by gnulix guy (gnulix_guy@hotmail.com) on 07:27 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#3) (User Info) http://members.xoom.com/gnulix_guy/ Greetings to all my beloved fans! The ``gnulix_guy'' is now back from a long hiatus (I'll not mention the details of it, except to say it involved frequent flyer miles and asian sex tours). Because I've not been able to access Slashdot from the jungles of Thailand, I'll be stepping up my efforts to keep my legion of Slashdot fans entertained with my daily witicisms. I know you've all been dying for me to say my tag line, so without further ado: GNULIX! ...signed, the ever-lovable gnulix guy! [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:I'm back! (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:37 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#40) fuck you [ Reply to This | Parent ] care factor=0 (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:27 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#4) oooooooh a big bad navy guy has something negative to say about MS! get a life rob [ Reply to This | Parent ] woohoo ! (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:29 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#5) Great, another ms bashing article, I didn't know what was missing. [ Reply to This | Parent ] LINUX IS KOOL (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:29 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#9) MY NME IS JOSH AND I AM A LINIS SYSTMS ADMISTRINATOR. I LIKE LINUX. MY BROTHER INSTALLED LINXU ON MY COMPUTER. ATFIRST I WAS MAD BECAUSE I COULDNT PLAY THE WINDOWS GAME WITH LINUX AND ALL IT DID WAS ASK FOR LOGIN. BUT THEN I LIKE LINUS BECAUSE MY BROTHER SHOWS ME HOW TO LOOK AT PICTURES OF NAKED GIRLS WITH NETSCAPE AND I CANT DO THAT WITH WINDOWS. I LIKE TO LOOK AT NAKED GIRLS EVEN THOUGH I KNOW THAT GIRLS HAVE COOTIES. THATS WHY I WANT A STONE GIRL SO SHE WONT GIVE ME COOTIES AND I CAN TOUCH HER BUTTOKCS.I LIKE LINUX.. PLEASE SEND ME WAREXZ [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:LINUX IS KOOL (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:57 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#65) plz send nekked dogsex pics to josh31337@aol.com [ Reply to This | Parent ] WITNESS: MY SHLONG (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:32 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#12) MY SHLONG BIG AND LONG MY SHLONG THE SIZE OF KING KONG WITNESS MY SHLONG thank you. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:WITNESS: MY SHLONG (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 09:03 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#72) Sorry, Peewee, 3 inches is NOT considered big [ Reply to This | Parent ] Under attack (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 07:45 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#18) Duty Watch: Sir, incoming enemy fighter off the port side, anti-ship missle locked! Captain: Ensign, take down that plane! Ensign's keyboard: Start > Programs > MSanti-aircraft > portside Ensign's monitor: "portside" requires SP4" [ Reply to This | Parent ] Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:09 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#31) I have been using lotus notes and MS outlook and believe it lotus SUCKS to name a few... 1. Most unpredictable inconsistant user interface To me an hour to find the reply all button, worse a notes devloper couldn't find it most people just copied the receipient list. (do you?) 2. Bloated with all kinds of legacy code (65MB client!) 3. Slow. Lotus notes 5 is the worst product i have ever seen. No wonder companies are shifting to M$ for their groupware concerns. Is there any GPL'd Groupware around, is there some one working on it. Its time we had one. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker (Score:1) by Logan Bear on 08:26 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#36) (User Info) To me an hour to find the reply all button, worse a notes devloper couldn't find it most people just copied the receipient list. Strange... With R5, you'd find it by clicking the Reply button and select Reply to All. A whole hour, hunh? [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:Another upper mgmt lotus notes sucker (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 09:01 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#69) It took me an hour to find out how to flush the toilet, finally I bailed it out with my coffee mug. [ Reply to This | Parent ] greetings (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:09 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#32) i don't know where to post this. so i'm posting it here. i came to read slashdot about a month because several peers of mine said i would enjoy it. they were 49% correct. i enjoy any article that dosen't touch the topic of an O/S. i am not going to say what i personally run, could it be the freshest linux kernal...or the freshest windows build...the world will never know. what they will know, and probably not care, is that this entity known as slashdot is slowly losing all value as it turns into a linuxuser vs. msuser forum. wow. just what we needed. the computer world fighting each other in it's prime development stage. what you people don't realize is that both OS's are pretty much lame. any OS is lame out of the box. it's up to the specific user to cater his OS, and tailor it around him. rodney king said it, and I the anonymous coward state it loud and proud. who gives a shit what OS you run as long as you are enjoying it and getting the most out of it. thank you, anonymous coward slackware user who just so happens to not discredit windows. it's not the brush, it's the artist. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:greetings (Score:1) by kaball (gotrooted@redmond.org) on 08:15 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#34) (User Info) Umm what exactly can i do to "tailor" windows? Huh?... Get the src and hack it to my preferances? I think not. The only thing i could do is either use litestep for a mock wm effect =P, or *shudder* buy M$ Plus or something to add some lame feature to a powerless OS. No the only way to go is GNU/Linux or BSD. [ Reply to This | Parent ] Re:greetings (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:45 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#54) Why don't you go join AOL and chat about Brittney Spears and Ricky Martin with the other kiddies? "Oh, Friends is my favorite show." 'Oh my god, mine too! Aren't they funny?' [ Reply to This | Parent ] Official Navy Homo gets sucked by Roblimo (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:36 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#39) Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] SlashDot rules (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:38 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#41) Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" wow [ Reply to This | Parent ] Trolls above (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:39 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#42) and below Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] blah blah (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:39 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#43) blah blah Slashdot has to be the suckiest site on the entire Internet. And Roblimo and CmdTaco (the fuck buddies) are playing attacking Microsoft for all it is worth. "Hey Robin maybe if we attack Microsoft our stock will go up in LNUX ? Probably so CmdrTaco.. now get back to sucking my dick little man!" [ Reply to This | Parent ] yada (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:40 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#44) yada yada blah blah blah blah [ Reply to This | Parent ] YEAH, STICK IT TO THE MAN! (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on 08:47 AM February 12th, 2000 EST (#60) blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah yadda yadda blah blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah blah blah bblah blah bla

  46. Re:I'm back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I second the motion! All in favor say "Aye".

  47. The Noive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    THE NAVY slams MICROSOFT?

    THIS from the people who brought us COBOL?

  48. Soo what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not rename /. to Microsoft.die.die.die?
    You Linux-freaks must have a low IQ.....

  49. Re: Balmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    was he that kinda psycho coke freak lookin' guy with the blond hair and the big mouth?? if so, he's fattening up nicely, looks like he could do a good elvis impersonation maybe..las vegas comes to mind

    i take my grits orally (with butter and sugar) - god bless texas

    yours truly,
    AC

  50. Re:I've looked at Win2000... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "..I get SOO mad when I can't just telnet into the NT box.

    Why don't you just install a telnet server on your NT box?

  51. Why Score -1?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!? They say something against Microsoft and use a Windows character set on their website. This _is_ funny. Who sets this strange scores? Who calls me a Troll?

    1. Re:Why Score -1?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who bring you Slashdot: Late News for Nerd-Wannabes. Some Stuff that Matters refers to them as "moderators." And the process is jokingly referred-to as "moderation."

  52. Re:A Golden Opportunity for Open Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Is a Digital Nervous System?
    In the coming years, digital technology will radically increase the speed at which business is conducted. It will change the relationship between businesses and their customers, and it will transform the roles of individual workers. How well an organization adapts to this changing business landscape will depend on the health of its internal digital processes--its "digital nervous system."

    "
    Just as machinery provides tremendous physical power, digital processes can enhance organizational intelligence by giving workers the information necessary to be more effective.

    Bill Gates
    Chairman/CEO
    Microsoft Corporation

    Though a digital nervous system is built on a combination of hardware and software, it is not a product. Think of the role a biological nervous system plays in living organisms. It controls the basic systems--respiratory, circulatory, digestive--that make life possible. It also receives sensory stimuli, transmits them to the brain, and instantly triggers a response. In humans the nervous system makes it possible to think and plan with foresight and creativity.

    An effective digital nervous system performs similar functions within an organization. It allows a company's internal processes to operate smoothly and quickly, enables an organization to respond to customer feedback quickly, gives it the ability to react to its competitive environment in a timely manner, and empowers employees with critical knowledge.

    The key is how effectively an organization manages the flow of its digital information. All kinds of information--numbers, text, audio, video--can now be put into digital form. Widely-available hardware and software has also made it possible--and necessary--for organizations of all sizes to reshape the way they conduct their business. In fact, many companies have already made many of the necessary investments in information technology to allow employees to obtain, store, share, and act upon information in new ways, from corporate intranets to the global network of the Internet.

    Success in this kind of environment, however, entails more than deploying technology. The idea is to employ it in a way that enhances how people work and that transforms how organizations operate. Businesses must create digital processes that manage and deliver important information to the employees who need it, helping them to respond effectively to changes and new opportunities, make decisions quickly, and fix problems as soon as they arise.

    Just as machinery provides tremendous physical power, digital processes can enhance organizational intelligence by giving workers the information necessary to be more effective. There is no standard digital nervous system. Because each business is different, its digital system will reflect its unique needs and structure.

    Ultimately, a digital nervous system will transform three major elements of any business: relationships to customers and business partners (e-commerce), information flow and relationships among workers within a company (knowledge management), and internal business processes (business operations). Microsoft is focused on developing products and partners that can help companies develop customized solutions in these three areas.

  53. unce sam wants YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We hate Microsoft too! JOIN THE NAVY NOW!

  54. Missing Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "He said that he intends to tell Ballmer that "we are your biggest customer and either change, or I'll tell and encourage the Navy and Marine Corps to look someplace else for services." (italics mine)

    Through all the pro-MS, anti-Slashdot infantile rants happening here, why hasn't this point come up? If MS's biggest customer is threatening to drop their product, it's news! Deal with it.

  55. Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is out of his mind. Making comments like this about Microsoft in public? Maybe he's not aware of the fact that Microsoft is a very large corporation with its own security people? This guy is nuts. He is playing with his very life. If he drops off the face of the Earth, none of us should be surprised.

    1. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This guy is out of his mind. Making comments like this about Microsoft in public? Maybe he's not aware of the fact that Microsoft is a very large corporation with its own security people? This guy is nuts. He is playing with his very life. If he drops off the face of the Earth, none of us should be surprised.

      He has guns and torpedoes and nuclear missiles, so why should he worry? Microsoft only has FUD.

    2. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He has guns and torpedoes and nuclear missiles, so why should he worry? Microsoft only has FUD.

      Gates is not worried. He knows that the Navy's guns and torpedoes and nuclear missiles are controlled by Microsoft software, and so all of it will probably mis-fire, or go awry.

    3. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that the Navy has an official policy against assasination. MS does not have such a policy and we know how loose their ethical pointer is.

  56. PLEASE MODERATE UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a godsend for anybody that is looking to release themselves from the shackles of NT and try using an actual operating system for once.

  57. check out the paperclip halway down the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out Ftrain for a review that trashes Microsoft Word.

  58. Re:OFFTOPIC NEGATiVE UNO (-1) BiTCH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It fails the troll consistency check? Ok, how about this? Enter Trollmond, WA, where we have Melinda and Bill cooking breakfast this fine Saturday morning. The grits are almost done and the two whiny brats are about to go to their rooms for being so insolent.

    Mr. Gates walks up to her squeeze like when she was his secretary, "hey pooky, how about I launch a bug up your ass?"

    Smiling, Mr. Gates nods in approval. Melinda squeals in excitement and pours the hot grits down Mr. Gates' underwear. Throwing off his glasses, he pins his aggressor onto the table and tears off her clothes. Quickly he turns her into stone.

    Quickly he calls up Ballmer on the bat phone and declares, "you won't believe what I have just done!"

    "What?" Ballmer chirped...

    "I turned Melinda into stone!"

    "Quick, let's release Windows 2000," Ballmer demanded as he summoned his marketing henchmen.

    "Now let's turn every computer to stone with the statue of Melinda!"

    "Excelleeeeent idea, Bill!"

  59. Re:We need to supply information to other buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    you mean "navy guy"

    Army guy, navy guy, what's the difference?

    They're all the same, anyway.

    "Don't ask. Don't tell."

  60. Re:Not to turn this into a productive conversation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on a Navy ship once, and the captain was running Doom. He said that was what they use to train the Marines on board to defend the ship against boarders.

  61. Re:This is fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you call a murderous herring?


    Jack the Kipper!




    It's good to see that art of comedy isn't dead.

    L. Ron. Hubbard.

  62. US NAVY! NUKE IRAN! YAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are laws against 'hate speech' so im not allowed to parody the navy lest janet reno rape me with a 10 foot banana in order to preserve the peace... however i can say that the US navy shot down an airplane full of iranian civilians in the 80s not to mention countless other crimes against humanity, so , in short, dear navy: shut the fuck up

  63. Moderate parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very good link to CVW.

  64. Navy Person Slams Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please stop stories with "X critiques Microsoft...

  65. Spy VS Spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider how easily the Chinese infiltrated our Nuclear Labs (Los Alamos) recently. Further, imagine how much easier it would be to stick an agent into Microsoft.

    Since we all know MS doesn't have much code review, how difficult would it be to shove in a couple lines to form a nice trojan horse. Maybe a self-destruct mechanism or just a CC to commies@china.com for every piece of e-mail that passes through a .gov or .mil system.

    If I was the Navy, I'd DEMAND Open Source Software and I'd damn well code review it myself.

  66. If you think Microsoft is bad for Military Stuff.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until (as Kurt Vonnegut writes) the

  67. Re:Guess you are too young to remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before getting too upset about Iran, learn about how the USA helped the Shah set up Savak. From what I've read/heard, it's not honorable.

  68. Please go away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...slashdot already has enough losers providing "color".

  69. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The divide by zero error was in the application itself, not NT Server. Microsoft is responsible for bugs in other companies' software?

  70. Life imitates art... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is this means Satan is coming soon. Why didn't I build that bunker when I had the chance?

    1. Re:Life imitates art... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Why didn't I build that bunker when I had the chance?

      Should be plenty available at close-out rates right now.

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  71. You are lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously have never used W2K. Most of the W2K bashers on ./ haven't.

  72. What a whiner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience.

    If he's found something that he prefers, then why does he keep paying MS and whining about it? Why not just register his shareware and be done with it?

    Shit, with his budget, he can afford to just outright buy whatever software that he wants, with source, and then be free forever.

    I think this guy just wants to pinch MS so that he can get on their payroll and get other special favors. When he goes to see Balmer, you can bet he'll bring an extra condom with him.

  73. fuck whoever moderated this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DUMBASS

    1. Re:fuck whoever moderated this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you that blinded by the light of linux that you refuse to see anything from any other perspective? If it's bad for microsoft it must be nice for linux? Just think... There's only a few stories that are posted here very day. Ton's are submitted. I bet a lot of them are a lot neater than someone reiterating what the slashdot community already feels and/or knows.

  74. Re:he's silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok then, give some shareware developer out there an early christmas present and buy his software. If not, then basically...shutup. Or was he hoping to get some beanie points by bashing Microsoft?

    My thinking exactly. If this guy was really looking for a good solution, he would just buy the shareware. He must want something "special" (e.g. kickback) from Microsoft. Note to IRS: take a good look at this guy's bank account if he ends up buying Microsoft products again this year.

    BTW, has he not been looking into Windows 2000?

    Would you? C'mon, Microsoft has had plenty of chances to get it right. After some point, one's expectations become a function of past performance. (Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me five times, shame on me.) Considering that the overall quality of Microsoft products has been dropping, it doesn't make sense to spend a lot of time investigating Windows 2000, especially this year. Maybe in 2003 when it comes out of beta, it will be worthy of a brief glance. But only after all other possibilities, which are more likely to bear fruit, have been investigated. For example, I would take a good hard look at recycling VIC-20s and TI99/4as before becoming desperate enough to settle for Windows 2000. Just as I would thoroughly check out Windows 2000 before giving up and settling on a Timex-Sinclair 1000 or ZX81.

    It's just common sense.

  75. What's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Army is a force that fights on land. The Navy fights on and under the sea, if you didn't know.

    When your ship rolls past the angle of no return, and capsizes, you know the difference.

    When you have to abandon ship hundreds of miles from land, you know the difference.

    Army doesn't need gyro stabilization for stationary guns on land; nice feature in tanks.

    Torpedoes and depth charges work really poorly on land.

    Korean war vet, here; was lucky.

  76. Undersecretary of the Navy Jerry MacArthur Hultin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kissin' ass and droppin' names!

  77. two wrongs dont make a right dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so stop blabbering about what they did to us and accept fucking responsibility for the babies and old women we killed with our taxpayer funded US Navy, our tax payer funded ship-to-air missiles , and our tax payer funded commanders and servicemen who blew their bodies all over the water.

    1. Re:two wrongs dont make a right dipshit by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Sure we screwed up royally on that one. Shit does happen, it was a mistake, a huge mistake and we should take responsibility. We shouldn't be like Israel. Remember their "mistake" with the USS Liberty. they never appologized for that. why should they, it wasn't a mistake, they murdered our brothers. they knew it was a US ship, they knew it was unarmed. they thought that the sailors on the Liberty knew that the Israeli army was executing POW's. They wanted to kill the whole crew. They shot the men who were in lifeboats. they wanted no witnesses to their war crimes.

      Shit does happen, and that's too bad. We need to pay reparations to the families of the victims.

      We created the theocracy in Iran by our support of SAVAK. It is our fault.

      How many stinger missiles did Reagan have to give to Iran to get them to hold the hostages until the day after his swearing in? What were those two Israeli C130's doing at Terhan airport the day of the hostages release? What were they carrying?

      --
      photosMy Photostream
  78. Goverment agencies don't know squat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad Mr. Navyman can't be specific about what he's saying. How soon we forget that the U.S. Government has no idea how to run a business. And we don't even have to talk about how inefficiently the armed forces is run. It's pretty typical that he can bash a big target like Microsoft but he can't give one argument to support his contention. Sounds like he's another politician that wants to jump on the "bash-Microsoft-to-draw-attention-away-from-my-own -inadequecies" bandwagon.

  79. Re:The Emperor has no clothes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a life

  80. Re:Not to turn this into a productive conversation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt the guy has a legitimate complaint. It's simply cool to bash Microsoft, especially if you're in the biggest monopoly of all: The money sucking $600 hammer wastage government. So humorous hearing some military clown griping about MS.

    I'd also question their "We're their number 1 customer!". Yeah, sure you are.

  81. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one certainly took me by surprise: The Flag icon next to a Non-John-Katz Article. Amazing!

  82. my moderator is my lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after i got off work at the stock exchange i went down to mistress moderators dungeon of pleasure, in beautiful downtown ypsilanti michigan. she was wearing a black leather corset that had the windows 95 logo embossed across its front. she said 'welcome jerry i am glad to see you again. now on your knees!' playing my rebellious game, i was slow to comply. she noticed this at once and i swear there was a smile across her face as she smacked me with an Oracle manual and told me to stop stalling. i protested she was too harsh. she merely laughed and smacked me with an old mouse "that's -1 for you, troll slave". then she made me look at pictures of naked jackie chan and said 'do you like this, little troll slut?" i said "mistress moderator this chain is too tight" and she smacked me "MINUS ONE, OFFTOPIC." then she asked again"do you like looking at naked ascii of jackie chan?" "no mistress" then she started stroking my privates with a sony Vaio, 'mmm i think you are lying to me' and as my penis engorged itself with blood i couldnt help but wonder if maybe some hot grits wouldnt go well with this forced homosexual encounter with images of naked jackie chan.

  83. Re:Because it's our money and our national defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bloated Goates/Dumbino is still outselling Outhouse/Sexchange.

  84. Re:Frontpage for Apache... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've had the frontPage version of Apache running on our linux server for about 2-3 years now without a hitch. Security is tough (big surprise!), so get the latest version and configure it as per the instructions. Mike

  85. Re:DoD Mandates favor Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the problems the DoD agencies face is that various mandates were made several years ago to standardize on Microsoft NT.

    Then it's time to bring back McCarthy and flush these disloyal traitors out.

  86. Re:A Golden Opportunity for Open Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they were using linux they would have gotton a stack dump and the partition on their HD would have been deleted!

    windows is bad...but linux is worse

    ----not flaimbait...just my Opinion

  87. OpenMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is funny! Hewlett-Packard does not use OpenMail for mail. They use Exchange. Isn't there a dog food test this is failing?

  88. So what? They were serious about Ada too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That didn't hold up over time. I'd love to see SPAWAR jump on this, but I can't see it.

  89. what a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy rants on microsoft products yet he doesn't state specific examples. He probably hasn't even spoken on the behalf of the navy to microsoft. How are developers supposed to deal with stupid customers, telepathically?

  90. A suggestion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that the US Navy should get OpenBSD.

  91. Re:We need to supply information to other buyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this bill to ban criticism of software passes, it'll only be the military that'll feel safe to say anything bad... :(

  92. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god that was a scary article. "Future SmartShips will have systems redundancy to ensure ships can continue to operate." Duuuh! Redundancy's only the very very first principle in building a reliable system! Did none of these go to school!?!? "Although Unix is more reliable, NT may become more reliable with time." So explain why the hell you invest in a system which may become reliable rather than one which already is???? "It wasn't as bad as all that, propulsion was only out for 2 hr 45 min" (paraphrase). Almighty, the Titanic and the Bismark were holed and sunk in far less time than that. What grade of clinical idiot do you have to be to think this is any way to run a navy?!?!?

  93. Re:A Golden Opportunity for Open Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it sucks bad when linux fills up your disk with that useless debugging information...

  94. Re: arg html by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we could se how much your HTML sucks... italic? line break? My God.

    And the funny part is you don't even know why you suck.

    LOL

  95. css_descramble.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * css_descramble.c
    *
    * Released under the version 2 of the GPL.
    *
    * Copyright 1999 Derek Fawcus
    *
    * This file contains functions to descramble CSS encrypted DVD content
    *
    */

    /*
    * Still in progress: Remove the use of the bit_reverse[] table by recoding
    * the generation of LFSR1. Finish combining this with
    * the css authentication code.
    *
    */

    #include
    #include
    #include "css-descramble.h"

    typedef unsigned char byte;

    /*
    *
    * some tables used for descrambling sectors and/or decrypting title keys
    *
    */

    static byte csstab1[256]=
    {
    0x33,0x73,0x3b,0x26,0x63,0x23,0x6b,0x76,0x3e,0x7e, 0x36,0x2b,0x6e,0x2e,0x
    66,0x7b,
    0xd3,0x93,0xdb,0x06,0x43,0x03,0x4b,0x96,0xde,0x9e, 0xd6,0x0b,0x4e,0x0e,0x
    46,0x9b,
    0x57,0x17,0x5f,0x82,0xc7,0x87,0xcf,0x12,0x5a,0x1a, 0x52,0x8f,0xca,0x8a,0x
    c2,0x1f,
    0xd9,0x99,0xd1,0x00,0x49,0x09,0x41,0x90,0xd8,0x98, 0xd0,0x01,0x48,0x08,0x
    40,0x91,
    0x3d,0x7d,0x35,0x24,0x6d,0x2d,0x65,0x74,0x3c,0x7c, 0x34,0x25,0x6c,0x2c,0x
    64,0x75,
    0xdd,0x9d,0xd5,0x04,0x4d,0x0d,0x45,0x94,0xdc,0x9c, 0xd4,0x05,0x4c,0x0c,0x
    44,0x95,
    0x59,0x19,0x51,0x80,0xc9,0x89,0xc1,0x10,0x58,0x18, 0x50,0x81,0xc8,0x88,0x
    c0,0x11,
    0xd7,0x97,0xdf,0x02,0x47,0x07,0x4f,0x92,0xda,0x9a, 0xd2,0x0f,0x4a,0x0a,0x
    42,0x9f,
    0x53,0x13,0x5b,0x86,0xc3,0x83,0xcb,0x16,0x5e,0x1e, 0x56,0x8b,0xce,0x8e,0x
    c6,0x1b,
    0xb3,0xf3,0xbb,0xa6,0xe3,0xa3,0xeb,0xf6,0xbe,0xfe, 0xb6,0xab,0xee,0xae,0x
    e6,0xfb,
    0x37,0x77,0x3f,0x22,0x67,0x27,0x6f,0x72,0x3a,0x7a, 0x32,0x2f,0x6a,0x2a,0x
    62,0x7f,
    0xb9,0xf9,0xb1,0xa0,0xe9,0xa9,0xe1,0xf0,0xb8,0xf8, 0xb0,0xa1,0xe8,0xa8,0x
    e0,0xf1,
    0x5d,0x1d,0x55,0x84,0xcd,0x8d,0xc5,0x14,0x5c,0x1c, 0x54,0x85,0xcc,0x8c,0x
    c4,0x15,
    0xbd,0xfd,0xb5,0xa4,0xed,0xad,0xe5,0xf4,0xbc,0xfc, 0xb4,0xa5,0xec,0xac,0x
    e4,0xf5,
    0x39,0x79,0x31,0x20,0x69,0x29,0x61,0x70,0x38,0x78, 0x30,0x21,0x68,0x28,0x
    60,0x71,
    0xb7,0xf7,0xbf,0xa2,0xe7,0xa7,0xef,0xf2,0xba,0xfa, 0xb2,0xaf,0xea,0xaa,0x
    e2,0xff
    };

    static byte lfsr1_bits0[256]=
    {
    0x00,0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x09,0x08, 0x0b,0x0a,0x0d,0x0c,0x
    0f,0x0e,
    0x12,0x13,0x10,0x11,0x16,0x17,0x14,0x15,0x1b,0x1a, 0x19,0x18,0x1f,0x1e,0x
    1d,0x1c,
    0x24,0x25,0x26,0x27,0x20,0x21,0x22,0x23,0x2d,0x2c, 0x2f,0x2e,0x29,0x28,0x
    2b,0x2a,
    0x36,0x37,0x34,0x35,0x32,0x33,0x30,0x31,0x3f,0x3e, 0x3d,0x3c,0x3b,0x3a,0x
    39,0x38,
    0x49,0x48,0x4b,0x4a,0x4d,0x4c,0x4f,0x4e,0x40,0x41, 0x42,0x43,0x44,0x45,0x
    46,0x47,
    0x5b,0x5a,0x59,0x58,0x5f,0x5e,0x5d,0x5c,0x52,0x53, 0x50,0x51,0x56,0x57,0x
    54,0x55,
    0x6d,0x6c,0x6f,0x6e,0x69,0x68,0x6b,0x6a,0x64,0x65, 0x66,0x67,0x60,0x61,0x
    62,0x63,
    0x7f,0x7e,0x7d,0x7c,0x7b,0x7a,0x79,0x78,0x76,0x77, 0x74,0x75,0x72,0x73,0x
    70,0x71,
    0x92,0x93,0x90,0x91,0x96,0x97,0x94,0x95,0x9b,0x9a, 0x99,0x98,0x9f,0x9e,0x
    9d,0x9c,
    0x80,0x81,0x82,0x83,0x84,0x85,0x86,0x87,0x89,0x88, 0x8b,0x8a,0x8d,0x8c,0x
    8f,0x8e,
    0xb6,0xb7,0xb4,0xb5,0xb2,0xb3,0xb0,0xb1,0xbf,0xbe, 0xbd,0xbc,0xbb,0xba,0x
    b9,0xb8,
    0xa4,0xa5,0xa6,0xa7,0xa0,0xa1,0xa2,0xa3,0xad,0xac, 0xaf,0xae,0xa9,0xa8,0x
    ab,0xaa,
    0xdb,0xda,0xd9,0xd8,0xdf,0xde,0xdd,0xdc,0xd2,0xd3, 0xd0,0xd1,0xd6,0xd7,0x
    d4,0xd5,
    0xc9,0xc8,0xcb,0xca,0xcd,0xcc,0xcf,0xce,0xc0,0xc1, 0xc2,0xc3,0xc4,0xc5,0x
    c6,0xc7,
    0xff,0xfe,0xfd,0xfc,0xfb,0xfa,0xf9,0xf8,0xf6,0xf7, 0xf4,0xf5,0xf2,0xf3,0x
    f0,0xf1,
    0xed,0xec,0xef,0xee,0xe9,0xe8,0xeb,0xea,0xe4,0xe5, 0xe6,0xe7,0xe0,0xe1,0x
    e2,0xe3
    };

    static byte lfsr1_bits1[512]=
    {
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff,
    0x00,0x24,0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0xdb,0xff,0x00,0x24, 0x49,0x6d,0x92,0xb6,0x
    db,0xff
    };

    /* Reverse the order of the bits within a byte.
    */
    static byte bit_reverse[256]=
    {
    0x00,0x80,0x40,0xc0,0x20,0xa0,0x60,0xe0,0x10,0x90, 0x50,0xd0,0x30,0xb0,0x
    70,0xf0,
    0x08,0x88,0x48,0xc8,0x28,0xa8,0x68,0xe8,0x18,0x98, 0x58,0xd8,0x38,0xb8,0x
    78,0xf8,
    0x04,0x84,0x44,0xc4,0x24,0xa4,0x64,0xe4,0x14,0x94, 0x54,0xd4,0x34,0xb4,0x
    74,0xf4,
    0x0c,0x8c,0x4c,0xcc,0x2c,0xac,0x6c,0xec,0x1c,0x9c, 0x5c,0xdc,0x3c,0xbc,0x
    7c,0xfc,
    0x02,0x82,0x42,0xc2,0x22,0xa2,0x62,0xe2,0x12,0x92, 0x52,0xd2,0x32,0xb2,0x
    72,0xf2,
    0x0a,0x8a,0x4a,0xca,0x2a,0xaa,0x6a,0xea,0x1a,0x9a, 0x5a,0xda,0x3a,0xba,0x
    7a,0xfa,
    0x06,0x86,0x46,0xc6,0x26,0xa6,0x66,0xe6,0x16,0x96, 0x56,0xd6,0x36,0xb6,0x
    76,0xf6,
    0x0e,0x8e,0x4e,0xce,0x2e,0xae,0x6e,0xee,0x1e,0x9e, 0x5e,0xde,0x3e,0xbe,0x
    7e,0xfe,
    0x01,0x81,0x41,0xc1,0x21,0xa1,0x61,0xe1,0x11,0x91, 0x51,0xd1,0x31,0xb1,0x
    71,0xf1,
    0x09,0x89,0x49,0xc9,0x29,0xa9,0x69,0xe9,0x19,0x99, 0x59,0xd9,0x39,0xb9,0x
    79,0xf9,
    0x05,0x85,0x45,0xc5,0x25,0xa5,0x65,0xe5,0x15,0x95, 0x55,0xd5,0x35,0xb5,0x
    75,0xf5,
    0x0d,0x8d,0x4d,0xcd,0x2d,0xad,0x6d,0xed,0x1d,0x9d, 0x5d,0xdd,0x3d,0xbd,0x
    7d,0xfd,
    0x03,0x83,0x43,0xc3,0x23,0xa3,0x63,0xe3,0x13,0x93, 0x53,0xd3,0x33,0xb3,0x
    73,0xf3,
    0x0b,0x8b,0x4b,0xcb,0x2b,0xab,0x6b,0xeb,0x1b,0x9b, 0x5b,0xdb,0x3b,0xbb,0x
    7b,0xfb,
    0x07,0x87,0x47,0xc7,0x27,0xa7,0x67,0xe7,0x17,0x97, 0x57,0xd7,0x37,0xb7,0x
    77,0xf7,
    0x0f,0x8f,0x4f,0xcf,0x2f,0xaf,0x6f,0xef,0x1f,0x9f, 0x5f,0xdf,0x3f,0xbf,0x
    7f,0xff
    };

    /*
    *
    * this function is only used internally when decrypting title key
    *
    */
    static void css_titlekey(byte *key, byte *im, byte invert)
    {
    unsigned int lfsr1_lo,lfsr1_hi,lfsr0,combined;
    byte o_lfsr0, o_lfsr1;
    byte k[5];
    int i;

    lfsr1_lo = im[0] | 0x100;
    lfsr1_hi = im[1];

    lfsr0 = ((im[4] >8)&0xff] >16)&0xff]>24)
    &0xff];

    combined = 0;
    for (i = 0; i >1;
    lfsr1_lo = ((lfsr1_lo&1)>7)^(lfsr0>>10)^(lfsr0>>11)^(lfsr0>>1 9);*/
    o_lfsr0 = (((((((lfsr0>>8)^lfsr0)>>1)^lfsr0)>>3)^lfsr0)>>7);
    lfsr0 = (lfsr0>>8)|(o_lfsr0>= 8;
    }

    key[4]=k[4]^csstab1[key[4]]^key[3];
    key[3]=k[3]^csstab1[key[3]]^key[2];
    key[2]=k[2]^csstab1[key[2]]^key[1];
    key[1]=k[1]^csstab1[key[1]]^key[0];
    key[0]=k[0]^csstab1[key[0]]^key[4];

    key[4]=k[4]^csstab1[key[4]]^key[3];
    key[3]=k[3]^csstab1[key[3]]^key[2];
    key[2]=k[2]^csstab1[key[2]]^key[1];
    key[1]=k[1]^csstab1[key[1]]^key[0];
    key[0]=k[0]^csstab1[key[0]];
    }

    /*
    *
    * this function decrypts a title key with the specified disk key
    *
    * tkey: the unobfuscated title key (XORed with BusKey)
    * dkey: the unobfuscated disk key (XORed with BusKey)
    * 2048 bytes in length (though only 5 bytes are needed, see below)
    * pkey: array of pointers to player keys and disk key offsets
    *
    *
    * use the result returned in tkey with css_descramble
    *
    */

    int css_decrypttitlekey(byte *tkey, byte *dkey, struct playkey **pkey)
    {
    byte test[5], pretkey[5];
    int i = 0;

    for (; *pkey; ++pkey, ++i) {
    memcpy(pretkey, dkey + (*pkey)->offset, 5);
    css_titlekey(pretkey, (*pkey)->key, 0);

    memcpy(test, dkey, 5);
    css_titlekey(test, pretkey, 0);

    if (memcmp(test, pretkey, 5) == 0) {
    fprintf(stderr, "Using Key %d\n", i+1);
    break;
    }
    }

    if (!*pkey) {
    fprintf(stderr, "Shit - Need Key %d\n", i+1);
    return 0;
    }

    css_titlekey(tkey, pretkey, 0xff);

    return 1;
    }

    /*
    *
    * this function does the actual descrambling
    *
    * sec: encrypted sector (2048 bytes)
    * key: decrypted title key obtained from css_decrypttitlekey
    *
    */
    void css_descramble(byte *sec,byte *key)
    {
    unsigned int lfsr1_lo,lfsr1_hi,lfsr0,combined;
    unsigned char o_lfsr0, o_lfsr1;
    unsigned char *end = sec + 0x800;
    #define SALTED(i) (key[i] ^ sec[0x54 + (i)])

    lfsr1_lo = SALTED(0) | 0x100;
    lfsr1_hi = SALTED(1);

    lfsr0 = ((SALTED(4) >8)&0xff] >16)&0xff]>24)
    &0xff];

    sec+=0x80;
    combined = 0;
    while (sec != end) {
    o_lfsr1 = lfsr1_bits0[lfsr1_hi] ^ lfsr1_bits1[lfsr1_lo];
    lfsr1_hi = lfsr1_lo>>1;
    lfsr1_lo = ((lfsr1_lo&1)>7)^(lfsr0>>10)^(lfsr0>>11)^(lfsr0>>1 9);*/
    o_lfsr0 = (((((((lfsr0>>8)^lfsr0)>>1)^lfsr0)>>3)^lfsr0)>>7);
    lfsr0 = (lfsr0>>8)|(o_lfsr0>= 8;
    }
    }

  96. css-auth.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * Copyright (C) 1999 Derek Fawcus
    *
    * This code may be used under the terms of Version 2 of the GPL,
    * read the file COPYING for details.
    *
    */

    /*
    * These routines do some reordering of the supplied data before
    * calling engine() to do the main work.
    *
    * The reordering seems similar to that done by the initial stages of
    * the DES algorithm, in that it looks like it's just been done to
    * try and make software decoding slower. I'm not sure that it
    * actually adds anything to the security.
    *
    * The nature of the shuffling is that the bits of the supplied
    * parameter 'varient' are reorganised (and some inverted), and
    * the bytes of the parameter 'challenge' are reorganised.
    *
    * The reorganisation in each routine is different, and the first
    * (CryptKey1) does not bother of play with the 'varient' parameter.
    *
    * Since this code is only run once per disk change, I've made the
    * code table driven in order to improve readability.
    *
    * Since these routines are so similar to each other, one could even
    * abstract them all to one routine supplied a parameter determining
    * the nature of the reordering it has to do.
    */

    #include "css-auth.h"

    typedef unsigned long u32;

    static void engine(int varient, byte const *input, struct block *output);

    void CryptKey1(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key)
    {
    static byte perm_challenge[] = {1,3,0,7,5, 2,9,6,4,8};

    byte scratch[10];
    int i;

    for (i = 9; i >= 0; --i)
    scratch[i] = challenge[perm_challenge[i]];

    engine(varient, scratch, key);
    }

    /* This shuffles the bits in varient to make perm_varient such that
    * 4 -> !3
    * 3 -> 4
    * varient bits: 2 -> 0 perm_varient bits
    * 1 -> 2
    * 0 -> !1
    */
    void CryptKey2(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key)
    {
    static byte perm_challenge[] = {6,1,9,3,8, 5,7,4,0,2};

    static byte perm_varient[] = {
    0x0a, 0x08, 0x0e, 0x0c, 0x0b, 0x09, 0x0f, 0x0d,
    0x1a, 0x18, 0x1e, 0x1c, 0x1b, 0x19, 0x1f, 0x1d,
    0x02, 0x00, 0x06, 0x04, 0x03, 0x01, 0x07, 0x05,
    0x12, 0x10, 0x16, 0x14, 0x13, 0x11, 0x17, 0x15};

    byte scratch[10];
    int i;

    for (i = 9; i >= 0; --i)
    scratch[i] = challenge[perm_challenge[i]];

    engine(perm_varient[varient], scratch, key);
    }

    /* This shuffles the bits in varient to make perm_varient such that
    * 4 -> 0
    * 3 -> !1
    * varient bits: 2 -> !4 perm_varient bits
    * 1 -> 2
    * 0 -> 3
    */
    void CryptBusKey(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key)
    {
    static byte perm_challenge[] = {4,0,3,5,7, 2,8,6,1,9};
    static byte perm_varient[] = {
    0x12, 0x1a, 0x16, 0x1e, 0x02, 0x0a, 0x06, 0x0e,
    0x10, 0x18, 0x14, 0x1c, 0x00, 0x08, 0x04, 0x0c,
    0x13, 0x1b, 0x17, 0x1f, 0x03, 0x0b, 0x07, 0x0f,
    0x11, 0x19, 0x15, 0x1d, 0x01, 0x09, 0x05, 0x0d};

    byte scratch[10];
    int i;

    for (i = 9; i >= 0; --i)
    scratch[i] = challenge[perm_challenge[i]];

    engine(perm_varient[varient], scratch, key);
    }

    /*
    * We use two LFSR's (seeded from some of the input data bytes) to
    * generate two streams of pseudo-random bits. These two bit streams
    * are then combined by simply adding with carry to generate a final
    * sequence of pseudo-random bits which is stored in the buffer that
    * 'output' points to the end of - len is the size of this buffer.
    *
    * The first LFSR is of degree 25, and has a polynomial of:
    * x^13 + x^5 + x^4 + x^1 + 1
    *
    * The second LSFR is of degree 17, and has a (primitive) polynomial of:
    * x^15 + x^1 + 1
    *
    * I don't know if these polynomials are primitive modulo 2, and thus
    * represent maximal-period LFSR's.
    *
    *
    * Note that we take the output of each LFSR from the new shifted in
    * bit, not the old shifted out bit. Thus for ease of use the LFSR's
    * are implemented in bit reversed order.
    *
    */
    static void generate_bits(byte *output, int len, struct block const *s)
    {
    u32 lfsr0, lfsr1;
    byte carry;

    /* In order to ensure that the LFSR works we need to ensure that the
    * initial values are non-zero. Thus when we initialise them from
    * the seed, we ensure that a bit is set.
    */
    lfsr0 = (s->b[0] b[1] b[2] & ~7) b[2] & 7);
    lfsr1 = (s->b[3] b[4];

    ++output;

    carry = 0;
    do {
    int bit;
    byte val;

    for (bit = 0, val = 0; bit > 24) ^ (lfsr0 >> 21) ^ (lfsr0 >> 20) ^ (lfsr0 >> 12)) & 1;
    lfsr0 = (lfsr0 > 16) ^ (lfsr1 >> 2)) & 1;
    lfsr1 = (lfsr1 > 1) & 1)

    combined = !o_lfsr1 + carry + !o_lfsr0;
    carry = BIT1(combined);
    val |= BIT0(combined) 0);
    }

    static byte Secret[];
    static byte Varients[];
    static byte Table0[];
    static byte Table1[];
    static byte Table2[];
    static byte Table3[];

    /*
    * This encryption engine implements one of 32 variations
    * one the same theme depending upon the choice in the
    * varient parameter (0 - 31).
    *
    * The algorithm itself manipulates a 40 bit input into
    * a 40 bit output.
    * The parameter 'input' is 80 bits. It consists of
    * the 40 bit input value that is to be encrypted followed
    * by a 40 bit seed value for the pseudo random number
    * generators.
    */
    static void engine(int varient, byte const *input, struct block *output)
    {
    byte cse, term, index;
    struct block temp1;
    struct block temp2;
    byte bits[30];

    int i;

    /* Feed the secret into the input values such that
    * we alter the seed to the LFSR's used above, then
    * generate the bits to play with.
    */
    for (i = 5; --i >= 0; )
    temp1.b[i] = input[5 + i] ^ Secret[i] ^ Table2[i];

    generate_bits(&bits[29], sizeof bits, &temp1);

    /* This term is used throughout the following to
    * select one of 32 different variations on the
    * algorithm.
    */
    cse = Varients[varient] ^ Table2[varient];

    /* Now the actual blocks doing the encryption. Each
    * of these works on 40 bits at a time and are quite
    * similar.
    */
    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = input[i]) {
    index = bits[25 + i] ^ input[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    temp1.b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    temp1.b[4] ^= temp1.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp1.b[i]) {
    index = bits[20 + i] ^ temp1.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    temp2.b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    temp2.b[4] ^= temp2.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp2.b[i]) {
    index = bits[15 + i] ^ temp2.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;
    index = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;

    temp1.b[i] = Table0[index] ^ Table2[index];
    }
    temp1.b[4] ^= temp1.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp1.b[i]) {
    index = bits[10 + i] ^ temp1.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    index = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;

    temp2.b[i] = Table0[index] ^ Table2[index];
    }
    temp2.b[4] ^= temp2.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp2.b[i]) {
    index = bits[5 + i] ^ temp2.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    temp1.b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    temp1.b[4] ^= temp1.b[0];

    for (i = 5, term = 0; --i >= 0; term = temp1.b[i]) {
    index = bits[i] ^ temp1.b[i];
    index = Table1[index] ^ ~Table2[index] ^ cse;

    output->b[i] = Table2[index] ^ Table3[index] ^ term;
    }
    }

    static byte Varients[] = {
    0xB7, 0x74, 0x85, 0xD0, 0xCC, 0xDB, 0xCA, 0x73,
    0x03, 0xFE, 0x31, 0x03, 0x52, 0xE0, 0xB7, 0x42,
    0x63, 0x16, 0xF2, 0x2A, 0x79, 0x52, 0xFF, 0x1B,
    0x7A, 0x11, 0xCA, 0x1A, 0x9B, 0x40, 0xAD, 0x01};

    static byte Secret[] = {0x55, 0xD6, 0xC4, 0xC5, 0x28};

    static byte Table0[] = {
    0xB7, 0xF4, 0x82, 0x57, 0xDA, 0x4D, 0xDB, 0xE2,
    0x2F, 0x52, 0x1A, 0xA8, 0x68, 0x5A, 0x8A, 0xFF,
    0xFB, 0x0E, 0x6D, 0x35, 0xF7, 0x5C, 0x76, 0x12,
    0xCE, 0x25, 0x79, 0x29, 0x39, 0x62, 0x08, 0x24,
    0xA5, 0x85, 0x7B, 0x56, 0x01, 0x23, 0x68, 0xCF,
    0x0A, 0xE2, 0x5A, 0xED, 0x3D, 0x59, 0xB0, 0xA9,
    0xB0, 0x2C, 0xF2, 0xB8, 0xEF, 0x32, 0xA9, 0x40,
    0x80, 0x71, 0xAF, 0x1E, 0xDE, 0x8F, 0x58, 0x88,
    0xB8, 0x3A, 0xD0, 0xFC, 0xC4, 0x1E, 0xB5, 0xA0,
    0xBB, 0x3B, 0x0F, 0x01, 0x7E, 0x1F, 0x9F, 0xD9,
    0xAA, 0xB8, 0x3D, 0x9D, 0x74, 0x1E, 0x25, 0xDB,
    0x37, 0x56, 0x8F, 0x16, 0xBA, 0x49, 0x2B, 0xAC,
    0xD0, 0xBD, 0x95, 0x20, 0xBE, 0x7A, 0x28, 0xD0,
    0x51, 0x64, 0x63, 0x1C, 0x7F, 0x66, 0x10, 0xBB,
    0xC4, 0x56, 0x1A, 0x04, 0x6E, 0x0A, 0xEC, 0x9C,
    0xD6, 0xE8, 0x9A, 0x7A, 0xCF, 0x8C, 0xDB, 0xB1,
    0xEF, 0x71, 0xDE, 0x31, 0xFF, 0x54, 0x3E, 0x5E,
    0x07, 0x69, 0x96, 0xB0, 0xCF, 0xDD, 0x9E, 0x47,
    0xC7, 0x96, 0x8F, 0xE4, 0x2B, 0x59, 0xC6, 0xEE,
    0xB9, 0x86, 0x9A, 0x64, 0x84, 0x72, 0xE2, 0x5B,
    0xA2, 0x96, 0x58, 0x99, 0x50, 0x03, 0xF5, 0x38,
    0x4D, 0x02, 0x7D, 0xE7, 0x7D, 0x75, 0xA7, 0xB8,
    0x67, 0x87, 0x84, 0x3F, 0x1D, 0x11, 0xE5, 0xFC,
    0x1E, 0xD3, 0x83, 0x16, 0xA5, 0x29, 0xF6, 0xC7,
    0x15, 0x61, 0x29, 0x1A, 0x43, 0x4F, 0x9B, 0xAF,
    0xC5, 0x87, 0x34, 0x6C, 0x0F, 0x3B, 0xA8, 0x1D,
    0x45, 0x58, 0x25, 0xDC, 0xA8, 0xA3, 0x3B, 0xD1,
    0x79, 0x1B, 0x48, 0xF2, 0xE9, 0x93, 0x1F, 0xFC,
    0xDB, 0x2A, 0x90, 0xA9, 0x8A, 0x3D, 0x39, 0x18,
    0xA3, 0x8E, 0x58, 0x6C, 0xE0, 0x12, 0xBB, 0x25,
    0xCD, 0x71, 0x22, 0xA2, 0x64, 0xC6, 0xE7, 0xFB,
    0xAD, 0x94, 0x77, 0x04, 0x9A, 0x39, 0xCF, 0x7C};

    static byte Table1[] = {
    0x8C, 0x47, 0xB0, 0xE1, 0xEB, 0xFC, 0xEB, 0x56,
    0x10, 0xE5, 0x2C, 0x1A, 0x5D, 0xEF, 0xBE, 0x4F,
    0x08, 0x75, 0x97, 0x4B, 0x0E, 0x25, 0x8E, 0x6E,
    0x39, 0x5A, 0x87, 0x53, 0xC4, 0x1F, 0xF4, 0x5C,
    0x4E, 0xE6, 0x99, 0x30, 0xE0, 0x42, 0x88, 0xAB,
    0xE5, 0x85, 0xBC, 0x8F, 0xD8, 0x3C, 0x54, 0xC9,
    0x53, 0x47, 0x18, 0xD6, 0x06, 0x5B, 0x41, 0x2C,
    0x67, 0x1E, 0x41, 0x74, 0x33, 0xE2, 0xB4, 0xE0,
    0x23, 0x29, 0x42, 0xEA, 0x55, 0x0F, 0x25, 0xB4,
    0x24, 0x2C, 0x99, 0x13, 0xEB, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0xC9,
    0xF9, 0x63, 0x67, 0x43, 0x2D, 0xC7, 0x7D, 0x07,
    0x60, 0x89, 0xD1, 0xCC, 0xE7, 0x94, 0x77, 0x74,
    0x9B, 0x7E, 0xD7, 0xE6, 0xFF, 0xBB, 0x68, 0x14,
    0x1E, 0xA3, 0x25, 0xDE, 0x3A, 0xA3, 0x54, 0x7B,
    0x87, 0x9D, 0x50, 0xCA, 0x27, 0xC3, 0xA4, 0x50,
    0x91, 0x27, 0xD4, 0xB0, 0x82, 0x41, 0x97, 0x79,
    0x94, 0x82, 0xAC, 0xC7, 0x8E, 0xA5, 0x4E, 0xAA,
    0x78, 0x9E, 0xE0, 0x42, 0xBA, 0x28, 0xEA, 0xB7,
    0x74, 0xAD, 0x35, 0xDA, 0x92, 0x60, 0x7E, 0xD2,
    0x0E, 0xB9, 0x24, 0x5E, 0x39, 0x4F, 0x5E, 0x63,
    0x09, 0xB5, 0xFA, 0xBF, 0xF1, 0x22, 0x55, 0x1C,
    0xE2, 0x25, 0xDB, 0xC5, 0xD8, 0x50, 0x03, 0x98,
    0xC4, 0xAC, 0x2E, 0x11, 0xB4, 0x38, 0x4D, 0xD0,
    0xB9, 0xFC, 0x2D, 0x3C, 0x08, 0x04, 0x5A, 0xEF,
    0xCE, 0x32, 0xFB, 0x4C, 0x92, 0x1E, 0x4B, 0xFB,
    0x1A, 0xD0, 0xE2, 0x3E, 0xDA, 0x6E, 0x7C, 0x4D,
    0x56, 0xC3, 0x3F, 0x42, 0xB1, 0x3A, 0x23, 0x4D,
    0x6E, 0x84, 0x56, 0x68, 0xF4, 0x0E, 0x03, 0x64,
    0xD0, 0xA9, 0x92, 0x2F, 0x8B, 0xBC, 0x39, 0x9C,
    0xAC, 0x09, 0x5E, 0xEE, 0xE5, 0x97, 0xBF, 0xA5,
    0xCE, 0xFA, 0x28, 0x2C, 0x6D, 0x4F, 0xEF, 0x77,
    0xAA, 0x1B, 0x79, 0x8E, 0x97, 0xB4, 0xC3, 0xF4};

    static byte Table2[] = {
    0xB7, 0x75, 0x81, 0xD5, 0xDC, 0xCA, 0xDE, 0x66,
    0x23, 0xDF, 0x15, 0x26, 0x62, 0xD1, 0x83, 0x77,
    0xE3, 0x97, 0x76, 0xAF, 0xE9, 0xC3, 0x6B, 0x8E,
    0xDA, 0xB0, 0x6E, 0xBF, 0x2B, 0xF1, 0x19, 0xB4,
    0x95, 0x34, 0x48, 0xE4, 0x37, 0x94, 0x5D, 0x7B,
    0x36, 0x5F, 0x65, 0x53, 0x07, 0xE2, 0x89, 0x11,
    0x98, 0x85, 0xD9, 0x12, 0xC1, 0x9D, 0x84, 0xEC,
    0xA4, 0xD4, 0x88, 0xB8, 0xFC, 0x2C, 0x79, 0x28,
    0xD8, 0xDB, 0xB3, 0x1E, 0xA2, 0xF9, 0xD0, 0x44,
    0xD7, 0xD6, 0x60, 0xEF, 0x14, 0xF4, 0xF6, 0x31,
    0xD2, 0x41, 0x46, 0x67, 0x0A, 0xE1, 0x58, 0x27,
    0x43, 0xA3, 0xF8, 0xE0, 0xC8, 0xBA, 0x5A, 0x5C,
    0x80, 0x6C, 0xC6, 0xF2, 0xE8, 0xAD, 0x7D, 0x04,
    0x0D, 0xB9, 0x3C, 0xC2, 0x25, 0xBD, 0x49, 0x63,
    0x8C, 0x9F, 0x51, 0xCE, 0x20, 0xC5, 0xA1, 0x50,
    0x92, 0x2D, 0xDD, 0xBC, 0x8D, 0x4F, 0x9A, 0x71,
    0x2F, 0x30, 0x1D, 0x73, 0x39, 0x13, 0xFB, 0x1A,
    0xCB, 0x24, 0x59, 0xFE, 0x05, 0x96, 0x57, 0x0F,
    0x1F, 0xCF, 0x54, 0xBE, 0xF5, 0x06, 0x1B, 0xB2,
    0x6D, 0xD3, 0x4D, 0x32, 0x56, 0x21, 0x33, 0x0B,
    0x52, 0xE7, 0xAB, 0xEB, 0xA6, 0x74, 0x00, 0x4C,
    0xB1, 0x7F, 0x82, 0x99, 0x87, 0x0E, 0x5E, 0xC0,
    0x8F, 0xEE, 0x6F, 0x55, 0xF3, 0x7E, 0x08, 0x90,
    0xFA, 0xB6, 0x64, 0x70, 0x47, 0x4A, 0x17, 0xA7,
    0xB5, 0x40, 0x8A, 0x38, 0xE5, 0x68, 0x3E, 0x8B,
    0x69, 0xAA, 0x9B, 0x42, 0xA5, 0x10, 0x01, 0x35,
    0xFD, 0x61, 0x9E, 0xE6, 0x16, 0x9C, 0x86, 0xED,
    0xCD, 0x2E, 0xFF, 0xC4, 0x5B, 0xA0, 0xAE, 0xCC,
    0x4B, 0x3B, 0x03, 0xBB, 0x1C, 0x2A, 0xAC, 0x0C,
    0x3F, 0x93, 0xC7, 0x72, 0x7A, 0x09, 0x22, 0x3D,
    0x45, 0x78, 0xA9, 0xA8, 0xEA, 0xC9, 0x6A, 0xF7,
    0x29, 0x91, 0xF0, 0x02, 0x18, 0x3A, 0x4E, 0x7C};

    static byte Table3[] = {
    0x73, 0x51, 0x95, 0xE1, 0x12, 0xE4, 0xC0, 0x58,
    0xEE, 0xF2, 0x08, 0x1B, 0xA9, 0xFA, 0x98, 0x4C,
    0xA7, 0x33, 0xE2, 0x1B, 0xA7, 0x6D, 0xF5, 0x30,
    0x97, 0x1D, 0xF3, 0x02, 0x60, 0x5A, 0x82, 0x0F,
    0x91, 0xD0, 0x9C, 0x10, 0x39, 0x7A, 0x83, 0x85,
    0x3B, 0xB2, 0xB8, 0xAE, 0x0C, 0x09, 0x52, 0xEA,
    0x1C, 0xE1, 0x8D, 0x66, 0x4F, 0xF3, 0xDA, 0x92,
    0x29, 0xB9, 0xD5, 0xC5, 0x77, 0x47, 0x22, 0x53,
    0x14, 0xF7, 0xAF, 0x22, 0x64, 0xDF, 0xC6, 0x72,
    0x12, 0xF3, 0x75, 0xDA, 0xD7, 0xD7, 0xE5, 0x02,
    0x9E, 0xED, 0xDA, 0xDB, 0x4C, 0x47, 0xCE, 0x91,
    0x06, 0x06, 0x6D, 0x55, 0x8B, 0x19, 0xC9, 0xEF,
    0x8C, 0x80, 0x1A, 0x0E, 0xEE, 0x4B, 0xAB, 0xF2,
    0x08, 0x5C, 0xE9, 0x37, 0x26, 0x5E, 0x9A, 0x90,
    0x00, 0xF3, 0x0D, 0xB2, 0xA6, 0xA3, 0xF7, 0x26,
    0x17, 0x48, 0x88, 0xC9, 0x0E, 0x2C, 0xC9, 0x02,
    0xE7, 0x18, 0x05, 0x4B, 0xF3, 0x39, 0xE1, 0x20,
    0x02, 0x0D, 0x40, 0xC7, 0xCA, 0xB9, 0x48, 0x30,
    0x57, 0x67, 0xCC, 0x06, 0xBF, 0xAC, 0x81, 0x08,
    0x24, 0x7A, 0xD4, 0x8B, 0x19, 0x8E, 0xAC, 0xB4,
    0x5A, 0x0F, 0x73, 0x13, 0xAC, 0x9E, 0xDA, 0xB6,
    0xB8, 0x96, 0x5B, 0x60, 0x88, 0xE1, 0x81, 0x3F,
    0x07, 0x86, 0x37, 0x2D, 0x79, 0x14, 0x52, 0xEA,
    0x73, 0xDF, 0x3D, 0x09, 0xC8, 0x25, 0x48, 0xD8,
    0x75, 0x60, 0x9A, 0x08, 0x27, 0x4A, 0x2C, 0xB9,
    0xA8, 0x8B, 0x8A, 0x73, 0x62, 0x37, 0x16, 0x02,
    0xBD, 0xC1, 0x0E, 0x56, 0x54, 0x3E, 0x14, 0x5F,
    0x8C, 0x8F, 0x6E, 0x75, 0x1C, 0x07, 0x39, 0x7B,
    0x4B, 0xDB, 0xD3, 0x4B, 0x1E, 0xC8, 0x7E, 0xFE,
    0x3E, 0x72, 0x16, 0x83, 0x7D, 0xEE, 0xF5, 0xCA,
    0xC5, 0x18, 0xF9, 0xD8, 0x68, 0xAB, 0x38, 0x85,
    0xA8, 0xF0, 0xA1, 0x73, 0x9F, 0x5D, 0x19, 0x0B,
    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
    0x33, 0x72, 0x39, 0x25, 0x67, 0x26, 0x6D, 0x71,
    0x36, 0x77, 0x3C, 0x20, 0x62, 0x23, 0x68, 0x74,
    0xC3, 0x82, 0xC9, 0x15, 0x57, 0x16, 0x5D, 0x81};

  97. css-cat.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * css-cat.c
    *
    * Copyright 1999 Derek Fawcus.
    *
    * Released under version 2 of the GPL.
    *
    * Decode selected sector types from a CSS encoded DVD to stdout. Use as a
    * filter on the input to mpeg2player or ac3dec.
    *
    */

    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #endif /* __linux__ */
    #include
    #include
    #include

    #include "css-descramble.h"

    static struct playkey pkey1a1 = {0x36b, {0x51,0x67,0x67,0xc5,0xe0}};
    static struct playkey pkey2a1 = {0x762, {0x2c,0xb2,0xc1,0x09,0xee}};
    static struct playkey pkey1b1 = {0x36b, {0x90,0xc1,0xd7,0x84,0x48}};

    static struct playkey pkey1a2 = {0x2f3, {0x51,0x67,0x67,0xc5,0xe0}};
    static struct playkey pkey2a2 = {0x730, {0x2c,0xb2,0xc1,0x09,0xee}};
    static struct playkey pkey1b2 = {0x2f3, {0x90,0xc1,0xd7,0x84,0x48}};

    static struct playkey pkey1a3 = {0x235, {0x51,0x67,0x67,0xc5,0xe0}};
    static struct playkey pkey1b3 = {0x235, {0x90,0xc1,0xd7,0x84,0x48}};

    static struct playkey pkey3a1 = {0x249, {0xb7,0x3f,0xd4,0xaa,0x14}}; /* DVD specific ? */
    static struct playkey pkey4a1 = {0x028, {0x53,0xd4,0xf7,0xd9,0x8f}}; /* DVD specific ? */

    static struct playkey *playkeys[] = {
    &pkey1a1, &pkey2a1, &pkey1b1,
    &pkey1a2, &pkey2a2, &pkey1b2,
    &pkey1a3, &pkey1b3,
    &pkey3a1, &pkey4a1,
    NULL};

    static unsigned char disk_key[2048];
    static unsigned char title_key[5];

    static unsigned char sector[2048];

    unsigned long sectors = 0;
    unsigned long crypted = 0;
    unsigned long skipped = 0;

    int do_all = 0;
    int do_video = 0;
    int do_ac3 = 0;
    int do_mpg = 0;
    int verbose = 0;
    int keep_pack = 0;
    int keep_pes = -1;

    #define STCODE(p,a,b,c,d) ((p)[0] == a && (p)[1] == b && (p)[2] == c && (p)[3] == d)

    static void un_css(int fdi, int fdo)
    {
    unsigned char *sp, *pes;
    int writen, wr, peslen, hdrlen;

    while (read(fdi, sector, 2048) == 2048) {
    ++sectors;
    if (!STCODE(sector,0x00,0x00,0x01,0xba)) {
    fputs("Not Pack start code\n", stderr);
    ++skipped; continue;
    }

    if (do_all)
    goto write_it;

    pes = sector + 14 + (sector[13] & 0x07);
    if (STCODE(pes,0x00,0x00,0x01,0xbb)) {/* System Header Pack Layer */
    peslen = (pes[0x04] 0 && writen 32)
    usage_exit();
    ++keep_pes;
    break;
    case '1': case '2': case '3': case '4':
    case '5': case '6': case '7': case '8':
    do_ac3 = c - '0';
    ++keep_pes;
    break;
    case EOF:
    goto got_args;
    default:
    usage_exit();
    break;
    }

    got_args:
    keep_pes = (keep_pes > 0) ? 1 : 0;

    return optind;
    }

    int main(int ac, char **av)
    {
    int ai, fd;
    char titlef[12];

    if ((fd = open("disk-key", O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
    perror("can't open disk-key");
    exit(1);
    }
    if (read(fd, disk_key, 2048) != 2048) {
    perror("can't read disk-key");
    close(fd);
    exit(1);
    }
    close(fd);

    if ((ai = parse_args(ac, av)) >= ac)
    usage_exit();

    strcpy(titlef, "title");
    strcat(titlef, title);
    strcat(titlef, "-key");

    if ((fd = open(titlef, O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
    perror("can't open title-key");
    exit(1);
    }
    if (read(fd, title_key, 5) != 5) {
    perror("can't read title-key");
    close(fd);
    exit(1);
    }
    close(fd);

    if (strcmp(av[ai], "-") == 0)
    fd = 0;
    else if ((fd = open(av[ai], O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
    fputs("can't open VOB file ", stderr);
    fputs(av[ai], stderr);
    perror("");
    exit(1);
    }

    if (!css_decrypttitlekey(title_key, disk_key, playkeys)) {
    close(fd);
    return 3;
    }

    un_css(fd, 1);

    fprintf(stderr, "Total %lu, skipped %lu, crvid %lu\n",
    sectors, skipped, crypted);

    close(fd);

    return 0;
    }

  98. css-descramble.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #ifndef __css_descramble_h_
    #define __css_descramble_h_

    struct playkey {
    int offset;
    unsigned char key[5];
    };

    extern int css_decrypttitlekey(unsigned char *tkey, unsigned char *dkey, struct playkey **pkey);
    extern void css_descramble(unsigned char *sec,unsigned char *key);

    #endif

  99. css-auth.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    typedef unsigned char byte;
    struct block {
    byte b[5];
    };

    extern void CryptKey1(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key);
    extern void CryptKey2(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key);
    extern void CryptBusKey(int varient, byte const *challenge, struct block *key);

  100. dvdinfo.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * A noddy program for getting and printing some info from the
    * DVD-ROM drive.
    */

    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__OpenBSD__)
    # include
    #elif defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #else
    # error "Need the DVD ioctls"
    #endif
    #include
    #include

    #define DVD "/dev/cdrom"

    int GetASF(int fd)
    {
    dvd_authinfo ai;

    ai.type = DVD_LU_SEND_ASF;
    ai.lsasf.agid = 0;
    ai.lsasf.asf = 0;

    if (ioctl(fd, DVD_AUTH, &ai)) {
    printf("GetASF failed\n");
    return 0;
    }

    printf("%sAuthenticated\n", (ai.lsasf.asf) ? "" : "not ");

    return 1;
    }

    int GetPhysical(int fd)
    {
    dvd_struct d;
    int layer = 0, layers = 4;

    d.physical.type = DVD_STRUCT_PHYSICAL;
    while (layer 1)
    device = av[1];

    fd = open(device, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);

    if (fd 0) {
    printf("unable to open dvd drive (%s).\n", device);
    return 1;
    }

    GetASF(fd);

    GetPhysical(fd);
    GetCopyright(fd);

    return 0;
    }

  101. reset.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * A noddy program which tries to reset all AGID's on the DVD-ROM drive.
    */

    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__OpenBSD__)
    # include
    #elif defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #else
    # error "Need the DVD ioctls"
    #endif
    #include
    #include

    static int fd;

    #define DVD "/dev/cdrom"

    int main(int ac, char **av)
    {
    dvd_authinfo ai;
    char *device = DVD;
    int i;

    if (ac > 1)
    device = av[1];

    fd = open(device, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);

    if (fd 0) {
    printf("unable to open dvd drive (%s).\n", device);
    return 1;
    }

    for (i = 0; i 4; i++) {
    memset(&ai, 0, sizeof(ai));
    ai.type = DVD_INVALIDATE_AGID;
    ai.lsa.agid = i;
    ioctl(fd, DVD_AUTH, &ai);
    }

    return 0;
    }

  102. tstdvd.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /*
    * tstdvd.c
    *
    * Example program showing usage of DVD CSS ioctls
    *
    * Copyright (C) 1999 Andrew T. Veliath
    * See http://www.rpi.edu/~veliaa/linux-dvd for more info.
    */

    /* Hacked about by Derek Fawcus such that
    * it can be used as a simple program to authenticate the
    * computer with the DVD-ROM drive.
    *
    * If supplied with one parameter it gets the disk key and
    * saves it to a file. If supplied with a second parameter
    * (a LBA) then it gets the title key for the supplied LBA.
    *
    * When getting the disk key, only the first 10 bytes of it
    * are printed. The whole key is written to the file.
    */

    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #include
    #if defined(__OpenBSD__)
    # include
    #elif defined(__linux__)
    # include
    #else
    # error "Need the DVD ioctls"
    #endif
    #include "css-auth.h"

    byte Challenge[10];
    struct block Key1;
    struct block Key2;
    struct block KeyCheck;
    byte DiscKey[10];
    int varient = -1;

    void print_challenge(const byte *chal)
    {
    int i;

    for (i = 0; i type) {
    /* Host data receive (host changes state) */
    case DVD_LU_SEND_AGID:
    printf("AGID %d\n", ai->lsa.agid);
    ai->type = DVD_HOST_SEND_CHALLENGE;
    break;

    case DVD_LU_SEND_KEY1:
    printf("LU sent key1: "); print_key(ai->lsk.key); printf("\n");
    if (!authenticate_drive(ai->lsk.key)) {
    ai->type = DVD_AUTH_FAILURE;
    return -EINVAL;
    }
    ai->type = DVD_LU_SEND_CHALLENGE;
    break;

    case DVD_LU_SEND_CHALLENGE:
    for (i = 0; i hsc.chal[9-i];
    printf("LU sent challenge: "); print_challenge(Challenge); printf("\n");
    CryptKey2(varient, Challenge, &Key2);
    ai->type = DVD_HOST_SEND_KEY2;
    break;

    /* Host data send */
    case DVD_HOST_SEND_CHALLENGE:
    for (i = 0; i hsc.chal[9-i] = Challenge[i];
    printf("Host sending challenge: "); print_challenge(Challenge); printf("\n");
    /* Returning data, let LU change state */
    break;

    case DVD_HOST_SEND_KEY2:
    for (i = 0; i hsk.key[4-i] = Key2.b[i];
    printf("Host sending key 2: "); print_key(Key2.b); printf("\n");
    /* Returning data, let LU change state */
    break;

    default:
    printf("Got invalid state %d\n", ai->type);
    return -EINVAL;
    }

    return 0;
    }

    int authenticate(int fd, int title, int lba)
    {
    dvd_authinfo ai;
    dvd_struct dvds;
    int i, rv, tries, agid;

    memset(&ai, 0, sizeof (ai));
    memset(&dvds, 0, sizeof (dvds));

    GetASF(fd);

    /* Init sequence, request AGID */
    for (tries = 1, rv = -1; rv == -1 && tries [title_path]\n");
    exit (1);
    }
    device = av[1];
    fd = open(device, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
    if (fd 0) {
    perror(device);
    exit(1);
    }
    if (ac == 3) {
    lba = path_to_lba(av[2]);
    title = 1;
    }
    authenticate(fd, title, lba);
    close(fd);

    return 0;
    }

  103. Makefile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    headers = css-auth.h
    tstdvd_objs = tstdvd.o css-auth.o
    validate_objs = validate.o css-auth.o
    cat_objs = css-cat.o css-descramble.o

    all: tstdvd reset dvdinfo css-cat

    tstdvd: $(tstdvd_objs) $(headers)
    gcc $(tstdvd_objs) -o $@

    css-cat: $(cat_objs) css-descramble.h
    gcc $(cat_objs) -o $@

    validate: $(validate_objs) $(headers)
    gcc $(validate_objs) -o $@

    clean:
    -rm -f *.o tstdvd validate reset dvdinfo

    dist-files = css-auth/COPYING css-auth/README css-auth/Makefile \
    css-auth/css-auth.h css-auth/css-auth.c \
    css-auth/tstdvd.c css-auth/dvdinfo.c css-auth/reset.c \
    css-auth/css-cat.c css-auth/css-descramble.c \
    css-auth/css-descramble.h

    dist:
    (cd ..;tar cvf css-auth.tar $(dist-files) )

  104. An Ode to Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    An Ode to Trolls

    Hello my dear friends
    I have something to say,
    Please gather around me
    And hear me this day.

    Do you ever wonder what it means to be a troll?
    To be laughed at and flamed and written off as cold?
    To be hated and dispised and hunted by some,
    To be a savior of justice, of liberty and of freedom?

    For never was there a more beautiful creature than a troll,
    One with great morals and purpose and ideals and goals,
    For where ever censorship and injustice and moderation do lie
    You can count on TollTroll, Gnulix or The Hot Grits Guy.

    We trolls will return justice and freedom to this land,
    We fear not the evil of the Moderators hand,
    After all look at what we trolls did for freedom on Usenet!
    Er, wait a second... ignore that, thats not what I meant :)

    So if you have ever wanted to be hated but loved,
    If you have ever wished to be kissed and then shoved,
    Help us trolls save slashdot from the hell that awaits,
    Before VA then Slashdot becomes the property of Bill Gates.

    (P.S. See you on the next weekly Troll Day (Tuesday))

    --
    POET TROLL
    YOU can make a difference. Join today.
    United Coalition of Trolls for the Abolition of Moderation

  105. An Ode to Troll Day (Part 1) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    An Ode to Troll Day (Part 1)

    Gather round all you friends
    For I have something to say,
    About a new invention
    We call it: Troll Day.

    A day of great joy
    A great fair to attend,
    Where everyone posts trolls
    And moderation is dead.

    It's not like most holidays
    Of which you may have been told,
    Since we hold it every Tuesday
    And everyone gets stoned.

    So now I take the pleasure
    to invite you all here,
    And remind you of our next Troll Day
    Held once a week, not once a year.

    (P.S. See you on Tuesday :))

    --
    POET TROLL
    YOU can make a difference. Join today.
    United Coalition of Trolls for the Abolition of Moderation

  106. Re:I'm back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aye!

  107. Because it's our money and our national defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    clueful developers to do cool things with Outlook...

    Oh yeah. LookOut! Perhaps the most despised client app by mail admins since Bloated Goats. Good idea.

    One could argue that only thing "clueful" about developers doing anything with LookOut! would have to be that they're clued that they can make a lot of money with no-questions-asked because it's Microsoft product.

    Yes, I'm an Admin. I get more complaints about e-mail problems from LookOut! users than all others combined. Imagine that. What good is an alleged "groupware" product if one can't even depend on it to deal with plain old e-mail reliably?

    And as far as groupware products go: last I looked, LookOut!/SexChange was the weakest of the pack. (Except perhaps in sales volume. It is, after all, a Microsoft product.)

    What the U.S. Navy ought to be doing is insisting that all of its vendors' products adhere to open standards. For the clue-impaired: Microsoft "standards" does not necessarily equate with open standards.

  108. Re:South Park The Movie predicted this ... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    Dude, people love to see bad things happen to people a lot more wealthy than themselves.

    People who want bad things to happen to esr, please stand up.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  109. Re:South Park The Movie predicted this ... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    Now people who want bad things to happen to this "ZicoKnows" (who is unlikely to be rich), please stand up...

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  110. Re:South Park The Movie predicted this ... by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 2
    Y'know, when I saw South Park: The Movie, and Bill Gates got shot, pretty much everyone in the theater applauded.

    I said to my wife at that time that Microsoft's monopoly is over, because the average person had finally acquired contempt for their shoddy products, even if they were still using them.

    New XFMail home page

  111. Not to turn this into a productive conversation... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Not to turn this troll fest into a productive conversation, but anyone know what good groupware products this guy might have been referring to?

    Any that run on NT? (I use what the boss tells me, deal with it.)

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  112. Re:Some thoughts on this... by Python · · Score: 2
    Its a lot closer to risk free than a closed sourced OS with millions of bugs in it (28K in Win2K... and those are just the ones they *know* about).

    Not to mention how expensive NT is and that us US citizens get to pay for such an inferior product, when better, cheaper, more relaiable options exist. Its inexcusible that the Navy single sourced with NT. Totally inexecusible.
    --
    Python

    --

    Python

  113. You are missing compilable perl code by kip3f · · Score: 1

    you need parens around the if test. Also, you might of meant post(\%article), which would pass a reference to the hash instead of converting it into a list (Assuming that you are not using prototypes and declaring post as sub post ($) { .. }).
    --
    Whether you think that you can, or that you can't, you are usually right.

    --
    ****Gfx Scrollbar Special case hit!!*****
  114. Re:What we need on Linux to replace Windoze by free779 · · Score: 1

    I don't know of any replacement for Visio. Dia looks good (do a search on Freshmeat), but it doesn't have all of the the functionality of Visio.
    http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/

    Novell is porting Novell Directory Services to Linux, which should make your SSO solution a snap, for NT and Linux machines. Native NDS services also means that you don't need a NetWare server.

    NDS is far better than ADS in almost all respects. It is stable, well-documented and supported. It is on its third version and tenth year of development. It works well with DNS, unlike ADS, which refuses to cooperate well with BIND (not just server, but client, too).
    http://www.novell.com/products/nds/

    Read more about the advantages of Novell NDS over Microsoft ADS here.
    http://www.novell.com/advantage/nds/

    HP OpenMail supports MS Outlook, including calendaring. Free license for Linux (no support and only 50 users).
    http://www.ice.hp.com/cyc/om/00/index.html

  115. Re:What groupware? by jd · · Score: 2
    I didn't say free groupware, I said groupware for a free OS. There's a BIG difference. So, I feel fully entitled to point out Lotus Notes, thank you very much.

    But, if you insist on free groupware, I suggest looking at SourceForge, CODA, Global File System, Reliable Multicast File Transfer, VIC, RAT, CVS, any NNTP server plus XVNews or newsreader with similar level of functionality, IMAP, Postfix, any fully-featured MIME-compliant e-mail package, ICQ for Linux (or similar) and this news site's Very Own Slash!

    If Exchange can match, 1:1, every scrap of functionality ovvered by the above setup, show me. If not, it's not worth wasting my time over. If I can do better, for less, using Industry-Standard Software and Protocols, I don't need to fork out large sums of money on something that doesn't offer anything else and throws away all the security I could have, using the free tools I've listed.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  116. Some thoughts on this... by jd · · Score: 3
    Linux companies, and companies deploying Linux (such as IBM and SGI) should be queueing up outside the Navy's office, about now, to tell them about this extremely robust system they know of, that DOES support the groupware the Navy needs, at a fraction of the cost, and without any risk of catastrophic failures or public relations disasters.

    IMHO, the Navy needs Linux. Linux doesn't particularly need any of the military, but they DO need it, or at least some Open Source system. I imagine FreeBSD and OpenBSD would be two good alternatives to Linux. (NetBSD is, from what I've heard, a hotbed of politics, which might make the more discerning customers a little nervous.)

    Open Source solutions provide the stability AND SECURITY that the Navy needs, both from a military and legal stand-point. There is also, as the gentleman pointed out (though mis-naming it "shareware"), the Groupware that he needs to operate an efficient service.

    In my books, I'd say that Linux and the *BSD's would be hot-favourites, right now, to win a contract with the Navy. And, once they see the sheer quality, I suspect they'll stick with it.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Some thoughts on this... by hummer · · Score: 1

      .....the groupware the Navy needs, at a fraction of the cost, and without any risk of catastrophic failures or public relations disasters....

      Fraction of the cost, possibly, but without any risk??? Come on.... You are kidding right? (At the very least you're kidding yourself). One only has to look at Bugtraq or the Errata list for any of the Major Distros to realise that there is plenty of potential for failure in Linux.

      The "Risk-Free" Operating system does not exist, and we don't do Linux any favours by touting it as that OS.

      hummer

    2. Re:Some thoughts on this... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > Linux doesn't particularly need any of the military,

      Linux does need some governmental entities to adopt it. If the entire government of a country gets on the Micorsoft bandwagon, then open protocols are toast in that country, and as the protocols go, so goes Linux.

      Adoption of Linux by major government institutions may also make that government friendlier to the notion of reverse engineering for the purposes of compatibility.

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Some thoughts on this... by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      I honestly can't figure out why our military is even considering using software they don't have the source code to. Who knows what MS employee from what country put what code in what DLL. I figure it must be much easier for some government to infiltrate Microsoft and plant a spy in there then it is to plant one in the navy.

      BSD's are probably a much better solution cos they can change the thing willy nilly without being bothered by the GPL.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  117. No, he's serious! by miniver · · Score: 1

    [ There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience. ]

    Ok then, give some shareware developer out there an early christmas present and buy his software. If not, then basically...shutup. Or was he hoping to get some beanie points by bashing Microsoft?

    The Department of Defense has already made a large commitment to using an Open Source groupware package called CVW, that was developed as an internal research project by MITRE. There's an article in the latest Linux Journal about it. My guess is that Undersecretary Hultin was referring to CVW, and confused shareware with open source.

    OSS trivia item: Eric Raymond was instrumental in helping convince MITRE (and their legal department) to release CVW as Open Source Software.

    --
    We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
  118. Re:Not to turn this into a productive conversation by miniver · · Score: 3

    The Department of Defense has already made a large commitment to using an Open Source groupware package called CVW, that was developed as an internal research project by MITRE. There's an article in the latest Linux Journal about it.

    --
    We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
  119. A Golden Opportunity for Open Outsourcing by Effugas · · Score: 2

    Federal development has a long history of public disclosure, and Open Source development is well known for providing the widest possible exposure of the codebase to security audit.

    The common weakness of Open Source projects is the limited bandwidth for integrating the influx of data, patches, and functionality requests. Good projects have, and need, that core group of developers to guide the flow of the code, and it's this behavior that lends legitimacy to claims of authorship long after others take over non-insignificant module implementation.

    This is the most concentrated point of labor in the otherwise highly distributed architecture of open code evolution. This, combined with the Federal Government's prediliction for disclosure and concerns about (national!) security, would make it advisable for at least a few government contracters to consider integrating the GPL as a key win in their official project bids.

    The timing is perfect: Microsoft's Worst-Case Scenario of the Sixty-Five Thousand Bug Operating System has deflated expectations of W2K considerably. Most governmental managers(decision makers) have just had a well-respected higher-up validate their employee's doubts in the "dominant paradigm". The market has fully validated Linux as a viable platform. And The Code Needs A Shepard.

    Why not Open Outsource? So much of the resistance to bringing in outside workers is that the internal developers aren't confident outside workers are going to meet their specific user requirements. Internal resistance would be lessened considerably if employees knew they could always fix the problems in software they were being tasked with deploying--and they'd even get to have their fixes integrated into the next release! Various departments would be able to cease redundant development; critical fixes would be integrated, experimental forks would be both possible and feasable at a low cost of exploration, and outside developments would be integrated into the central source trees based upon the strength of functionality, not force.

    Open Outsourcing is the answer to the question of how the code development house makes money in the essay <a href="http://www.doxpara.com/core.html">I published some time ago</a>, and should be considered by decision makers throughout the entire market. I was just recently working on integrating this information into my essay before the DDoS stuff hit; I'd be happy to have it ready as soon as possible if anybody wishes to take advantage of it to try to win a contract.

    Yours Truly,

    Dan Kaminsky
    DoxPara Research
    http://www.doxpara.com

    1. Re:A Golden Opportunity for Open Outsourcing by Effugas · · Score: 2

      Interesting. Appears to be an attempt at a rebuttal, or maybe something trying to elicit rampant anti-MS ranting.

      You're not going to get that out of me; I hate Microsoft's business processes far more than I'll ever disrespect its coders by arbitrarily condemning the fruits of their labor.

      Much Windows code is broken. Much isn't--I hold quite a bit of respect to your User Interface people, and I'm not afraid to admit it.

      There are, however, some major problems with any infrastructure built upon Microsoft solutions. One serious issue is that, for alot of what MS does, they're the only ones that can do it--the collateral damage of the hidden and obfuscated OS interfaces which let MS attain dominance in the Office Suite market has been that Microsoft hasn't had the internal drive to fix those problems that everyone else needs to suffer through, but that Microsoft can escape by accessing their API's.

      You'll never find Ordinals(API's accessed by numbers alone) on the Linux platform. And while there's alot of stuff you won't find on Linux, there's very little you can be sure you'll *never* find. And that's a problem.

      I don't really want to argue the questionability of Microsoft in the literal programmatic space, if for no other reason than I think there are quite a few counterarguments that can be brought up that are entirely valid. The point is not really that Windows is an inferior environment to program in, it's that it's a much *harder* environment to program correctly, and worse, it's *intentionally* harder.

      Linux, despite the lack of a VS6-grade IDE(and that's coming in the form of KDevelop), is and will always be far simpler for developers to dip their toes into. All systems ship with a compiler, and incremental study of universally available can convert even armchair coders into contributing members of the Linux community. There's a real bottom line in the fact that large scale customers can direct their own internal coders to fixing mission critical problems(i.e. the ones who are suffering the financial ruin can directly contribute to increasing their own savings) while small scale customers too tiny to appear on Microsoft's roadmap can still pull themselves out of the fire.

      I agree with Microsoft's concept of a "digital nervous system", though I'm annoyed by the acronym. I'm just not convinced Microsoft is the greatest supplier of this system, and I don't think anyone else is either.

      More about why I think the Open environment generates better code can be found in the essay on my website; please, feel free to respond with any concerns you might have after reading it or this post.

      Yours Truly,

      Dan Kaminsky
      DoxPara Research
      http://www.doxpara.com

    2. Re:A Golden Opportunity for Open Outsourcing by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      Since when are MS marketdroids posting here. Where did you get this from the MS web site?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  120. Lotus Notes by ksheff · · Score: 1

    The 4.6 Notes client does work with Wine. It's not 100%, but it is enough for everyday use. I've used it and the only thing stopping me from using it all the time on linux instead of windows is a lack of memory on my linux machine. I believe a guy in our linux user group now only uses it on linux. Check out http://www.brooklinesw.com/linux/lin uxnotes.html for more information.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  121. Re:Will IBM play its Linux trump card? by ksheff · · Score: 1

    Nightmare? It shouldn't be a nightmare for a company that knows what it's doing, like IBM. The company I work for has thousands of unix machines (soon to include linux) distributed across the US. I don't think anyone considers it a 'nightmare'. Standardize the software/hardware distribution and make sure that only authorized people have the ability to update the software. Given the support contracts involved with something like the Federal Government, I'm sure it's more like a dream than a nightmare.

    Just because there are a ton of MSCEs, doesn't mean we have to justify their existence. That's like saying at 1900, there's a ton of blacksmiths, buggies, and horses, so just forget about those automobiles.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  122. O'reilly have a nifty book on groupware. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Groupware systems are fairly easy to implement. I mean real groupware stuff, not the bollocks that Exchange pretends to be.

    http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/pracintgr/

    So many sheep go with Exchange though, when in fact it's functionally destitute.

    --
    Deleted
  123. Navy's comments == Bidding Ammo by Skim123 · · Score: 1
    Let's see... the Navy is up for the rebidding process w/Microsoft soon. I think this is their attempt to try to get MS to accept a lower bid. Nothing more.

    What would be really funny would be to see the Navy running on Shareware products! :)

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  124. US? N?av?y by morbid · · Score: 1

    T?he US? Na?vy ?has ?an ob?jection? to Micros~1?
    soft?are

    C?n they? like wr?te an article using somethin? ?hat works so ?e can re?d wh?t thei? grievance is?

    ?

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  125. My guess is they'll go back to Notes by mikemcc · · Score: 1

    My bet is that they'll return to Lotus Notes.

    I quit my last job, which was primarily web development using Notes/Domino 4.6, because 4.6 was an incredibly frustrating platform upon which to develop good web applications - that is, applications which are designed to run in a web browser.

    But Notes is an incredibly powerful platform if you are willing to use the Notes client. Notes has already received the necessary security certifications - otherwise the Navy wouldn't have been using it previously.

    IBM, Lotus' parent company, has made Domino a central part of their larger internet strategy. IBM is making WebSphere work very closely with Domino, has greatly extended Java servlet support in Domino, and has included Domino support in their Visual Age for Java IDE.

    I don't know of any other "industrial strength" groupware packages which have met the government's security requirements. They may very well be out there, but if so they definitely have a "nice" market, and a deficient Marketing department.

  126. Why do we care? by adamwood · · Score: 2


    This isn't "news for nerds". It's a suit using some speech for his own purpose -- be it a to get a discount from MS, join the bash MS bangwagon or whatever.

    As it happens, groupware under Windows gets much better if you take a peep at Exchange 2000 or hire clueful developers to do cool things with Outlook...

    1. Re:Why do we care? by Raven667 · · Score: 1

      Actually, although I can't speak for the Navy, they may already have lock-in to Outlook 98/2K. When I left, the Air Force was beginning their roll-out of DMS (Defense Messaging System) which uses and Outlook plugin along with X.400 directory services and Fortezza cards (embedded crypto on PCMCIA cards) for secure encrypted message passing. Unless they rewrite and re-roll out this system they are going to be using Outlook for some time.

      On annother note, except for being extremely bloated Outlook is not too bad. Although based on what I have read (I haven't used it myself) it is no competition for Lotus Notes. I use Novell GroupWise now and it has some pretty neat features, but the butt-ugliest client you could imagine (I used to use Netscape Communicator over GW LDAP to manage my mail until my mailbox caused the service to crash, repeadedly. I can't manage my mail lists with the Windows or Web based clients, they have no message threading).

      Just my $0.02 from the Peanut Gallery.

      --
      -- Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
    2. Re:Why do we care? by galadriel · · Score: 1

      Someone "suit" bashes M$ for his own ends...you don't think "we" should care...

      But "we" care when someone clueless or clueful makes _any_ kind of statement about linux.

    3. Re:Why do we care? by ruin · · Score: 1
      hire clueful developers to do cool things with Outlook...

      I'm really trying to understand what you mean by "cool things." I can really only think of two:

      1. Rewrite it from scratch.
      2. Write a program that removes Outlook from the network, and prevents it from ever being reinstalled. (no small feat)

      --
      share and enjoy
  127. This Is For Keeps Now! by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't want them to take a journalistic chance, now, would you? Don't you realize that millions of dollars are riding on the shareholder's perception of this internet property?

  128. Re:The Emperor has no clothes by TonyGreene · · Score: 1

    >So, what Linux groupware products can we turn the Navy on to?

    HP OpenMail or Lotus Notes for the server. What we still need is a good Lotus client for Linux.

  129. DoD Mandates favor Microsoft by sckick · · Score: 1

    One of the problems the DoD agencies face is that various mandates were made several years ago to standardize on Microsoft NT. Another problem is that new contracts are required to comply with the DISA DII COE. Currently only Microsoft NT, Solaris and HP Unix are directly supported by DISA. Until they directly support a Linux distribution or roll thier own, it will be very hard to get Linux based products into the DoD and other government agencies.

  130. Re:he's silly by jim68000 · · Score: 1

    Funny that he starts bashing microsoft just before negotiating on the (presumably vast) Intranet/Internet project. You don't think thew Navy pays retail, do you?

    --
    -- need more time?
  131. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by llywrch · · Score: 2

    >Microsoft is responsible for bugs in other companies' software?

    Any decent OS is responsible for handling error messages from the client applications, & keeping the rest of the system chugging along.

    Think about it: if you had just kicked off an application that would update records in a million-row DB table, & it could be destroyed by some newbie's error of forgetting to include a semicolon, would *YOU* trust your work to that OS?

    Of course, someone in the Navy was just plain stupid for entrusting an entire ship's safety to just one computer. A single, lucky shot could disable the computer, & the warship would be just as dead in the water if it was running NT, UNIX, or some POS written by a crackhead in return for a case of Ripple. And some prime rock.

    Geoff

    --
    I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  132. Try Netscape Calendar? by Wench · · Score: 1

    Re point 3:

    It may not be heavy duty enough for your needs, and it has the occasional bug, but the calendar works very nicely to keep our mixed workgroup of 40 assorted Linux, Windows and Mac users coordinated.

    It has quite decent meeting and task scheduling. I guess you could also use Netscape mail if you liked. (Personally I just keep an Xterm open for pine).

    --
    No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up.
  133. OT: Smart Quotes by panda · · Score: 1

    Ok, this is off-topic and it's a major troll, but I wish that all the clueless lusers who write their web pages with word processing software would learn to turn off Smart Quotes. That crap just doesn't look right on the web, and as a result of the luser using Smart Quotes in this article, I stopped reading after the third or fourth sentence.

    Some people just need to get their asses kicked!

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
  134. Was it just me... by PsychoSpunk · · Score: 1

    Or were you wishing that there were shareware products to change the ? to the proper character?

    --
    ALL HAIL BRAK!!!
  135. Re:Is This Signal? Or Noise? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

    It isn't just the secretary of the Navy -- Microsoft has been doing a bunch of customer research into Lotus Notes operations, as well as prepackaged web-based solutions, and they've heard about a million reasons why MS Groupware sucks.

    Microsoft's answer to groupware is Microsoft Exchange. But what do you think of Exchange as being? An expensive Email server.

    It sounds to me like they've gotten the message that Exchange (as it stands) will never be more than a half-assed e-mail/calendar server. The problem is changing directions.

    They've been running around whispering about some vaporware called "Tahoe" for a while now. The goal is to make MS Office the groupware 'client', and to make extended versions of IIS and MSSQL the groupware 'server'. Exchange only fits into the picture as an MTA -- it's unstable Jet databases are going to fade quietly into the night.

    Note that if they can pull this off, they will strike at a big weak spot in Lotus. Notes has always had pretty poor integration with MS Office because they've chosen to sold the integration features as a value add in Lotus SmartSuite. The problem is that 95% of their customers use MS Office and have to fumble around with file attachments, etc.

    --

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  136. Re:Is This Signal? Or Noise? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

    My understanding is that's incorrect -- the SQL backend is planned for Exchange 7. Ex2000 (v6) does allow you have mutiple Jet databases, however.

    (I am a little confused at the "web store" feature -- as far as I can tell it's exchange stuff stored as XML documents in the traditional Jet backend. It does, however, allow Lotus Domino-like webserving of groupware content.)
    --

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  137. Re:Is This Signal? Or Noise? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

    I just can't help but thinking that if they really implemented MSDE, they would have "Powered By SQL Server!" written all over the marketing materials. Still there's a beta sitting around, so I suppose I could install it and see. (Of course, I could also start burning myself with cigarettes just for fun -- I've been waiting around since the v4 beta cycle for Exchange to get even halfassed, and I've pretty much lost patience.)
    --

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  138. Another reason why navy is mad at MS. by generic · · Score: 1

    They converted from HP-UX to NT for ship operations and the system crashed during sea trials. See it here

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  139. Re:South Park The Movie predicted this ... by Zico · · Score: 1

    Dude, people love to see bad things happen to people a lot more wealthy than themselves. Your wife was probably wondering how she married such a simpleton.

  140. Re:South Park The Movie predicted this ... by Zico · · Score: 1

    People who want bad things to happen to esr, please stand up.

    You've never read any ESR-related threads on Slashdot, have you? In other words, terrible choice.

    Well, unless you were trying to rally people to want bad things to happen to ESR, which I wouldn't advocate, but would have to admit was funny, considering that we're on Slashdot.

    Cheers,
    ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  141. Re: arg html by Skinka · · Score: 1
    I keep forgetting the default now is text not html :|

    Then change your prefs so that html is default..
    Customise Comments -> Comment post mode

  142. Re:What groupware? by Roundeye · · Score: 2
    Hell, cans and string tied to a barbecue grill make better groupware than the Exchange lineup. I'd rather try to use my penis to bang out morse code on red coals than suffer through Exchange. "How come when I {post to this group/forum, send this mail, search through this directory, etc.} it {takes 45 minutes to pop out, is in the wrong order, is jumbled up, has these little squares and hieroglyphics, has the attachments screwed up, tries to dialup, etc.}?" Yeah I ever wanna deal with that shit again. I know exactly why that guy's irate. Friggin' shitware. Sendmail version 5 (yeah, "5"), talk, a common shared directory with a 2Mb quota, and an NNTP server from 1992 using tin (over ssh launched from a DOS prompt) are more effective than friggin' Exchange.

    O.k., so I exaggerated a bit -- make that a 4Mb quota.

    --
    "Cause there's 40 different shades of black, so many fortresses and ways to attack, so why you complainin'?"
  143. Re:Is This Signal? Or Noise? by ppanon · · Score: 1

    Hey, first they use MTS (Michigan Terminal System) as the name for their transaction monitor. Now they use Tahoe, which everybody knows really was an intermediate BSD 4.3 release, as a codename for an unreleased Microsoft product. Perhaps they are trying to sow confusion so that everybody forgets past superior operating systems. It's a good thing Linus has trademarked Linux; otherwise the next rumored product from Microsoft might be the W2K-based "Linux" telephony/PBX server.

    Personally, I'm thinking of starting a new line of stainless steel cookware for geeks called "L'Inox" :-)

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  144. Re: arg html by ppanon · · Score: 1

    Small Comment Penalty (Assign -1 to comments smaller than this many characters. This might cause somecomments to be rated -2 and hence rendered invisible!)
    Long Comment Bonus (Assign +1 to lengthy comments)


    What i really want is:

    All Capitals penalty (Assign -2 to comments which contain more than 50% capital letters)

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  145. Shit Happens by FatSean · · Score: 1

    See Above

    --
    Blar.
  146. Great... More unsecure servers... by desertfool · · Score: 1

    Just what the net needed. More servers to be used by script kiddies as launching points for DoS attacks. How many geeks work for the Navy?

    Geez, what do they think they are? UCSB or Stanford?

    --
    Just a dude. Stuck in IT.
  147. Navy purchasing policies by gruntvald · · Score: 1

    The navy's existing purchasing policy is that anything Microsoft needs no sign off to buy it (i.e. you can buy with no approval). Anything non-microsoft requires the regular approval procedure. This is anectdotal, from a buddy who worked recently in the navy, but believed to be accurate. For navy offices busting a gut to be efficient/effective this policy is not condusive to qc.

  148. Tax Dollars and Training by abh · · Score: 1

    I'm looking at the article, which states that until last year the Navy had a license with Lotus for competing products.

    I am then assuming that they dropped Lotus and switched to Microsoft... a move that undoubtedly used hundreds of thousands (if not more) tax dollars for re-training employees. Now they're possibly looking at switching again. How much is that going to cost me?

    Here's a suggestion: evaluate a product before you buy it.

  149. Re:Anal-retentive english teachers by seanb · · Score: 1

    I still say we need a (-1, Pedantic) moderation option.

  150. Re:Will IBM play its Linux trump card? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Um.. you're talking about IBM here. They used to have phalanxes of people to throw at every support problem. They'd love to again deal with a huge IBM Linux installed base.

  151. Re:The Emperor has no clothes by Ozric · · Score: 1

    I think He speaks of ZOPE. DC just did a big job for the NAVY overhauling their People Search Site.

    They must have showed them what ZOPE in the hands of a Zen Master can really do. For very little cost.

  152. With a budget of $88 billion... by john187 · · Score: 1

    The NAVY can do anything they want with money like that. They probably think they are saving money by using shrink wrap products, but not with a cutthroat company like MS. They could DEVELOP any productivity apps they want for that kind of money.

    Too bad innovation is so difficult for these major govenerment agencies, not to mention the number of parasites that will take the development cash, not produce anything, and run.

    John

  153. Re:I've looked at Win2000... by habib23 · · Score: 1

    The entire comment is rendered invalid by even suggesting that W2K is worse than 98. I mean, didn't you ever talk to the guys doing desktop support? 98 is practically unsupportable. Add in a large environment and you are just screwed. W2k may be more complicated than it is worth, but it is still so much better than 98 that they don't belong in the same sentence. We all like *nix better (or are some kind of masochists), but there are hierarchies of crap.

    --
    wake up and find out that you are the eyes of the world.
  154. No by / · · Score: 2

    That's been around for over a year now. Just put in the # of characters after which the comment gets the +1 bonus. Putting in 0 disables it.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  155. doing the math by dermond · · Score: 1
    ok. let's assume that you have 600 000 ppl working for you who need some software product A and it costs you only $10 per seat and year.(where of course most software will cost you some aditional $100 because it only runs on operating system A-doze and an additional $100 on average for necessary hardware upgrade etc..) but let us assume just $10 for product A. that gives 6 mill$.

    for this much money you can pay a dozen of full time programmes who write you a custom application that does what you want. (maybe hiring the programmes of the shareware product you like) if you open soucre that application you are not dependent on them and get additonal people working for you for free! plus: an organisation which is fianced by public taxes should give something back to the people for their money after all..

    mond.

    1. Re:doing the math by Anonynous+Coward · · Score: 1
      if you open soucre that application you are not dependent on them and get additonal people working for you for free!

      I think the general idea of the government supporting Open Source software is great. It will solve a lot of their problems.

      However, the argument that "if you Open Source it, They will come" is easily shown to be false based on the history of open sourced projects. Getting Open Source hacker types to work on something as unsexy as groupware, especially when it was started by evil BIG BROTHER would be a neat trick. I don't see it happening.

  156. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by pingbak · · Score: 1

    The Navy has this plan called "IT-21", which makes it mandatory to use "Commercial, off-the-shelf" technologies. Usually, "COTS" is code for "MS Windows NT". Unfortunately, this is still being used by the Navy and its contractors in the new smart ship program. Which doesn't make me feel all that good when my next ship tour comes up in a couple of years. Clearly, this plan needs revising.

    However, that doesn't mean that I refuse to advocate "The right tool for the right job", like FreeBSD for web servers, etc. The problem is that enlisted rates like the DP's and the RM's (now IT's) had bad experiences with other Unixes and like the "simplicity" of NT.

    OTOH, the Navy also committed to ATM as their fundamental network technology for the 21st century. So, ...

    -scooter

  157. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by pingbak · · Score: 1

    A divide by zero shouldn't cause a blue screen of death. Which is what happened on the servers.

    -scooter

  158. Don't Try To Do Any Favors ... by Gordo+Toor · · Score: 1
    ... At least not this way.

    "I'm going to Microsoft at the end of this month to say to [chief executive officer] Steve Ballmer, 'You talk about how you create a business group process system, but I'll tell you [that] you don't come close to giving us what we need,' "

    This doesn't say anything that everyone doesn't already know. His trip, IMHO, would be an expensive trip all for the purpose of _not much_. He's basically said, "We want to spend money on your Microjunk, but we cannot justify it now. We'll give you another chance, though, and we'll buy your stuff if you change it." That's not a tough stand at all.

    There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience.

    That's great ... now MS will be sure to stomp those smaller software vendors out of business ... all in the name of "giving the Navy what they need."

    What the Navy needs to be doing is going out and seeking partnerships w/ those smaller vendors, promoting their work, and pumping money some place other than into MS.
    --
    I wrote the play & still own the script ...

  159. Re: negotiating strategy? No, single source issue by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    He wasn't trying to knock down the price, he wasn't even warning the bidders that the days of "nobody was ever fired for buying Microsoft" are over.

    The key is in the final paragraph of the story. There are four companies bidding on this job, and all have indicated they intend to use Microsoft products. Pure chance, of course, since everyone knows that Microsoft is not a monopoly (*cough*).

    Since all bidders will use the same product, this is essentially a "single source" bid. Single source bids tend to make government agencies very nervous, esp. when that single source has a history of successful government prosecution for misdeeds. But the companies each fear that breaking from the non-opoly will is equivalent to voting for the libertarian candidate - it may make you feel better, but you don't have a snowball's chance in Hell of winning.

    Enter the gentlemen and his comments. He is sending a clear signal to the companies that it is not immediate suicide to announce a plan that doesn't include set-asides for the impoverished communities outside Seattle. To retain credibility, the nature of the game requires that at least one of the two finalists include non-MS products (assuming it isn't *totally* DOA), otherwise the military will be getting straight MS bids for the next 30 years.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  160. Re: negotiating strategy? No, single source issue by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    The government will only accept bids from companies that are certified as capable of satisfying the contract. This is a *huge* contract, and it's no coincidence that the companies listed include IBM, CSC, and a couple other large companies whose name escapes me at the moment.

    This means that not only is no "young" company eligible to place a bid, even the senior project management is likely to be "highly experienced" at federal contracts. Read: expect everyone to have spent twenty years in the military, then another decade or two in defense contracts on the other side of the fence. I've known a few very cool project managers, but most of them seem stuck in the past century. Make that *two* centuries ago, now. Where you see a neat new technology, they will see buddies killed because the new-fangled M-16 rifle jammed in Vietnam.

    (Just wait until a BoI finds that a ship was lost, with all hands, due to a stupid software error....)

    That said, some groups might want to experiment with the hardware you describe. But this sounds more like a DARPA-funded research project than a billion dollar multi-year contract.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  161. Re:Is This Signal? Or Noise? by Malcontent · · Score: 1

    "So why the story? And why post it here?"

    Because now not only do you know it, all the geeks in the server room know it but the govt knows it as well.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  162. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by Malcontent · · Score: 1

    No they are responsible for building an OS that can't be crashed by a rouge application.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  163. Re:he's silly by Malcontent · · Score: 1

    Why should he shut up doesn't he have first amendment rights? Or is MS now more powerful then the US Navy?

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  164. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

    wasn't it even worse? didn't a single program on a single workstation lockup and take the server down, which took down all the NT servers on the ship?

  165. Uh, yeah, and he would know shit about anything. by Qic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, some dude who shaves his head once a week and was trained to fix only things covered in manuals would be an authority figure in this field. Did anyone ever consider that the navy's screw up with MS products might just have been due to the majority of mid-west morons that join up to avoid working at the lube rack?

    Who was it that said, "Stupid is as stupid does."

    If you don't like what you see on the highway, put your computer back in the box and take it back to the store damnit.

  166. Re:Best Endeavour contracts by divec · · Score: 1

    Sorry, my mistake. I stand corrected.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  167. South Park The Movie predicted this ... by divec · · Score: 2

    Except maybe Balmer will get shot, not Gates.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  168. Shareware groupware products by divec · · Score: 2

    They may be better in some respects but not overall. They may implement things that MS obviously could without any difficulty but haven't.

    If MS is better overall, it doesn't mean that they haven't missed out on some really obvious features that people need.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  169. We need to supply information to other buyers by divec · · Score: 2

    One of the ways the free market operates is that feedback about goods on sale becomes public knowledge. So if a company rips one person off, they can tell everyone else before the whole market gets ripped off. As far as I can see, the army guy is just exercising this right/responsibility.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    1. Re:We need to supply information to other buyers by JordanH · · Score: 2
      • One of the ways the free market operates is that feedback about goods on sale becomes public knowledge. So if a company rips one person off, they can tell everyone else before the whole market gets ripped off.

      The fact that Microsoft has been able to get away with ripping off people for so long is exactly because they don't operate in a free market.

      The low Microsoft quality and high profits are the best indication that they are, in fact, a monopoly.


      -Jordan Henderson

  170. Best Endeavour contracts by divec · · Score: 2

    Big organisations rarely buy 36000 copies of a piece of shrinkwrapped software. They negotiate a contract with the software house, whereby the software house guarantees that the software will serve its purpose (e.g.) 99.9% of the time. A "best endeavour" contract says that the software house will do everything in its power to make this happen, even if it bankrupts them to do it.
    So the army bloke has probably got his fingers burnt in a contract like this.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  171. I'm back! by gnulix+guy · · Score: 0

    Greetings to all my beloved fans! The ``gnulix_guy'' is now back from a long hiatus (I'll not mention the details of it, except to say it involved frequent flyer miles and asian sex tours). Because I've not been able to access Slashdot from the jungles of Thailand, I'll be stepping up my efforts to keep my legion of Slashdot fans entertained with my daily witicisms.

    I know you've all been dying for me to say my tag line, so without further ado:

    GNULIX!

    --
    ...signed, the ever-lovable gnulix guy!
    1. Re:I'm back! by S�gnal+ll · · Score: 1

      Welcome back. This site has been sadly lacking
      in humor.

  172. What groupware? by cameldrv · · Score: 1

    Ok, since you seem to be pretty sure about there being good free groupware available for Linux, name the package that's better than Microsoft's exchange system. And don't say Lotus notes because that's not free.

    1. Re:What groupware? by f.money · · Score: 1

      HP OpenMail. I haven't used it, but from all I've heard, it's a drop in Exchange replacement that works better, is cheaper, and generally sucks less. Jon

  173. Re:I've looked at Win2000... by Raelin · · Score: 1

    NT 4.0 Server does too, however, the problem with it isn't that you can't telnet in, it's that you can't run much of anything, as NT was designed to be one person sitting at the machine, not many people running processes off the machine. The command line tools in NT are not documented terribly well, and most of the programs you run in NT assume you are right there at the computer. It makes it a real pain to try and get something to work without PCAnywhere, or BO2k, or whatever your favorite remote mgmt tool is.
    --Rae

    --
    Blah I can't get my sig to work, it won't fit.
  174. The Emperor has no clothes by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 3

    I think the anti-trust suit may have finally stripped M$ of its aura of invincibility in the public eye. For a long time, Joe Random Public thought that the world's largest software company must be just the greatest, particulary if J.R.P. never had the opportunity to see software from any other company. This is still true of a lot of people today, but I think that the general public is finally catching on to the astonishing idea that M$ may actually suck.

    Many of those in charge of procurement in the military may have known this for a long time. But it may have only recently become possible for someone like this guy to say so in public.

    So, what Linux groupware products can we turn the Navy on to?

  175. Guess you are too young to remember... by operagost · · Score: 1

    ... the hostages, and the journalists they murdered in 1979.
    The burning of our flag, and vows to kill us all, the "Great Satan" nation.

    Two wrongs don't make a right. Just wanted to remind you.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  176. Re:he's silly by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

    If whatever shareware he's talking about is that good, he just might, but remember this is the Government we're talking about. There are layers upon layers upon sublayers upon strata of bureaucracy to plow through before you get to the point where you hand Joe Developer a check for his shareware text editor. However, since this IS the Government, that check could end up being for 100,000 copies of JoeDevWrite.
    --

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  177. Re:Not to turn this into a productive conversation by plankton14 · · Score: 1

    While I vividly recall playing Starcraft on the lan, it had no official reason to be there, along with redneck rampage and the FT's porn collection. Bottom line: the shit put on the system was put there because there was no experienced admin, NT "looks" easy, price wasn't a factor, and evidently the entire federal government was supposed to settle on a single operating system and NT was picked (thank you, Redmond political lobby).
    Want a truly scary site? Check out http://www.ntgov.com , a site that goes along with a magazine i've seen on every boat i've been stationed on, and at the Naval Reserve Center in Louisville, Ky.

    About the Marines...Either he was full of shit, or you are. Speaking as a former submariner w/ 6yrs in, the only navy ships i know of with a marine detachment would be "gator freightors" (amphib assault), or carriers. And they do NOT learn tactics from Doom (unless you count sinking like a stone in water... we damn near drowned some jarheads once...looong story) Contrary to popular opinion, the security i've seen on surface ships isn't that tight. The most junior personnel are the ones who get stuck guarding the ship/boat. On surface ships, the crew is usually large enough, and the guards green enough, that they don't know the entire crew. (btw, us bubbleheads are much tighter knit. y'know what they say... 100 men go down, 50 couples come up...) As long as you wear the right uniform, show what looks like a green military id, and salute the watch and ensign properly, they haven't a clue. That's not to say i recommend trying it, however: even a tiny fast attack sub in stand-down with a skeleton crew onboard still has at least four people minimum up and alert at all times, with detailed plans for alerting the rest of the crew/base and armed defense.

  178. Pegasus E-mail by plankton14 · · Score: 1

    ...that's the only free "groupware" product I can think of. I've seen it in use on more than one U.S. submarine. In my opinion, it's not bad, but it's not all that great either.
    The only other program that springs to mind is Goldmine, and that sure as hell ain't cheap, let alone free. Then again, I didn't spend much time onboard surface ships, so I may have missed something.

  179. Re:Navy and Linux by TimeWaste · · Score: 1

    This is hardly the first anti-Microsoft story in GCN. The one that comes to my mind is the one about how one dude decided that NT is insecure as a web server and is going back to the only secure web platform: Macintosh. (and the basis of this security is that Macintosh has zero remote administration)

  180. Re:Sendmail is not groupware by richi · · Score: 1

    Try OpenMail.

  181. Navy and Linux by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    I work for the Navy and often employ Linux/Perl/Apache for intranet apps and to use it as a Samba server.

    Recently, per a request by Linux today, I wrote a short article on my experience with using Open Source software in the Navy. Before I could release the article and had to run it by "legal". They came back and denied my request for publishing the article as it could be construed that the Navy was promoting or endorsing a product.

    The following month I came across an article in "Government Computer News" that highlighted the grow use of NT at JPL. The article might have been written by MS propaganda department. So it is good to see someone up high come out and make some realistic comments concerning MS products.

  182. Great job Slashdot by Zagato-sama · · Score: 1

    Wow, is it me or is Slashdot launching a anti-Win2K news campaign right before it's release? And here I thought only Microsoft was capable of FUD. Congratulations on proving me wrong. So are all these news articles paid for by VA? How about posting some positive Win2K articles without any sarcastic quip from the "reporter"? Oh that's right, Slashdot is commited to herding it's readers into one particular direction. How silly of me to believe that even a remote attempt at unbiased reporting could happen here.

  183. Good Luck to the Undersecretary.... by kiwipunk · · Score: 1

    According to the article, annual NAVY expenditures are 88 Billion. Fist Call lists Microsoft's annual revenues for 1999 at 21.8 Billion. While the NAVY may be Microsolft's biggest customer, it is unlikely that the ultimate barganing chip - Naval dissertion of Microsoft products - will deeply impact M$ in the eyes of Wall Street. Besides, M$ has significantly increased soft money "donations" to both political parties. So, I wish the Undersecretary good luck in his discussions with the M$ CEO. By summer, he will probably be working for Red Hat.

  184. Re:Is This Signal? Or Noise? by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

    FYI: Exchange 2000 ( in beta now) uses SQL server as database, btw.
    ---

  185. Re:Is This Signal? Or Noise? by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

    I thought it was the new MSDE (m$ Data Engine, the single user SQL server that can be installed INSTEAD of Jet on Access 2k with a custom install). In this case the only "user" of the database is Exchange, so it's OK. MSDE is completely file compatible with SQL Server, you can turn a MSDE database to a SQL server just by using SQL's "attach database" statement. I might be wrong. It seems like the feature set of M$ products keeps changing every time I look. First COM+ is part of Win2k, then it's not, then it's back in......
    ---

  186. freedom of regular expression? (-1 Whine) by Speare · · Score: 2

    In the interest of OpenSource, or the geek's right to reverse-engineer closed processes, I am posting my theories on the slashdot submission queue process:

    • if $article{title} =~ /quake|linux|mp3/ ||
      $article{body} =~ /(msft|microsoft|riaa|patent) suck/
      {
      post(%article);
      }

    Am I missing something?

    (freedom of regular expression =anagram> so, exposing referred formulae)
    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  187. he's silly by TummyX · · Score: 1


    There are shareware products that have better groupware features than those of Microsoft products, he said, drawing applause from the audience.
    </i>
    <br><br>
    Ok then, give some shareware developer out there an early christmas present and buy his software.
    If not, then basically...shutup. Or was he hoping to get some beanie points by bashing Microsoft?
    <br><br>
    BTW, has he not been looking into Windows 2000?

  188. cunning by TummyX · · Score: 1

    thanks :)

  189. Re: arg html by TummyX · · Score: 2

    why was the 'smart' html/text hybrid removed?
    I keep forgetting the default now is text not html :|

  190. thanks n/t by TummyX · · Score: 2

    :P

  191. Re:I've looked at Win2000... by jerdenn · · Score: 1

    Win 2000 has a built in Telnet Server...

  192. Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by ssheth · · Score: 1
    I wonder if the Navy is still smarting over the ship on which they installed WinNT to run majority of control / steering functions. The server crashed due to some div-zero bug and the whole ship shut down -- had to be towed back to base.

    See http://slashdot.org/articles/9807 21/1049204.shtml

    for more memories.

    1. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by whoosp · · Score: 1

      What's really bad, man, are those lipstick applications. Bringin' us all down, man.

    2. Re:Reminds me of the WinNT Ship by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      The really frightening thing about the WinNT ship is that it was a Ticonderoga class cruiser, just like the U.S.S. Vincennes, which accidentally shot down an Iranian airliner about 10 years ago. That's not the kind of ship you want having buggy software.

  193. Re:Will IBM play its Linux trump card? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

    Hey! I want that driver for my 5.25" missile battery as well, so they'd better release it as Open Source!

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  194. Jerry MacArthur Hultin by solar · · Score: 1

    Here's The Honorable Jerry MacArthur Hultin's webpage. You can even snag a 1.5 megabyte picture of him! (Why anyone would do that is beyond me...)

  195. GO NAVY Fuck you M$ by lintix · · Score: 1

    FUCKING HELL YEAH!!
    Now if we can only get the NAVY to go Linux instead of

    Winblows NT

    SA Isaac Griffith
    United States Navy

    --
    Those who wear glasses should not throw them at stones
  196. Re: arg html by pnevares · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is this new:

    Small Comment Penalty (Assign -1 to comments smaller than this many characters. This might cause some comments to be rated -2 and hence rendered invisible!)
    Long Comment Bonus (Assign +1 to lengthy comments)


    What am I supposed to choose for the second one, it's just a text box! =) And I don't remember seeing either one before...

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".

    --

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".
  197. People should be more reflective by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    It's so typical of people to attack what they don't like, even if they would have done the same thing. The point is that it's you and me that have been fooled around by Microsoft, and then we start whining when we realize the prize to pay. It's not Microsofts fault that people are so easy to screw around, and what company won't take people's money? We should really think more about our lives and take responsibility for our own silliness.

    - Steeltoe

  198. Is This Signal? Or Noise? by John+Murdoch · · Score: 2

    The Undersecretary of the Navy is going to go to Redmond to tell Steve Ballmer that Microsoft's groupware products are terrible.

    So? Does he think he's going to tell Ballmer something that Ballmer doesn't already know?

    Quick Quiz Time: Name Microsoft's "groupware products" that we're talking about here. Ready? What's your answer?

    Microsoft's answer to groupware is Microsoft Exchange. But what do you think of Exchange as being? An expensive Email server. What does the entire corporate marketplace think of Exchange as being? An expensive Email server. Perhaps a slow, difficult-to-administer, and expensive Email server. I run a small company, and we're a Microsoft ISV. We get Exchange for free (bundled with the rest of the software we license) and we're likely to toss it for a Linux server and SendMail. Build enterprise applications on top of Exchange? You must be joking....

    But is that some revelation to the Navy? To the Undersecretary? To Steve Ballmer? To Bill? Nope. If Microsoft's corporate muscle, marketing prowess, and sheer evil were one-third of what the Dept. of Justice (and your typical Linux pre-teen) insist, Exchange would be ubiquitous. Lotus Notes is sold at very hefty prices--much higher prices than Microsoft charges for Exchange (if Microsoft charges anything for Exchange at all). Lotus is sold by IBM, which is the living embodiment of "ham-handed" sales. So why does Notes still exist? Because Microsoft has a turkey of a product, and they (and everybody else) knows it.

    So why the story? And why post it here?

  199. Clinton: New Policy on Penguins in the Military by cburley · · Score: 2
    Today, President Clinton announced a new policy to handle the longstanding issue of closet Linux users throughout the military.

    The policy, dubbed "Don't Ask, Don't Shell", promises that as long as Linux users don't make their preferences known, they won't be disciplined.

    Bill Gates called the policy "...a poor compromise compared to the proper response of interrogation and dismissal of anyone with Open Source tendencies, given the importance of secrecy in military organizations."

    Nor was Linus Torvalds happy with the outcome. "It is ridiculous to think that, in the year 2000 -- or, in Microsoft terms, 1980 2.0 -- soldiers have to worry about being open and honest about using Linux. It's not bash users, but Linux-using bashers who should be targeted as insufficiently American for the military", said the famous Finn.

    Richard M. Stallman claims the policy is a strained attempt to solve a problem with military personnel using Linux. "GNU/Linux users in the military might make better soldiers in the long run, which should TCL the generals. But soldiers using proprietary software shouldn't be allowed to benefit from working arm-in-arm with GNU/Linux users. That'd be an unfair Scheme since the GNU/Linux software can be shared but the proprietary software cannot."

    Military personnel asked about this new policy had a wide range of reactions:

    • "I don't want to find myself stuck in a foxhole with some Linux nut, but I guess as long as he keeps it to himself, I can live with it."
    • "Linux or Microsoft, who cares, as long as the job gets done."
    • "How am I supposed to keep my using Linux a secret -- reboot my machine twice a day for no apparent reason?"

    The Linux and BSD Alliance, formed to combat source-bashing worldwide, claims the policy is a small first step towards widespread acceptance of consenting adults exchanging source code as they see fit. Spokesdeity Eric Raymond explains, "we've long felt that if every closet user of an Open Source(TM) product in the military suddenly turned blue, they'd look butt-ugly in those uniforms." (Raymond is a well-known supporter of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear source.)

    On a more humorous note, the editor of Soldier of Fortune Magazine announced they were responding to the new policy by making a small change to their name. They'll now be known as "Soldier of fortune Magazine".

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  200. Re:Not to turn this into a productive conversation by jck · · Score: 1

    He is probably talking about replacing Exchange with something like Sendmail(depending on what He meant by shareware).

  201. The US Government does have linux experience by quasimoto · · Score: 1
    In the 'bad' old days the US Postal Service was a Digital Equipment shop; VMS, RSX-11, RT-11. Could not have those pc computers doing *real* tasks. Well I heard the pc/microsoft idea is dead in the 'real-time Process Control' area. Might be true. And the rumor that Linux (Debian) is saving the day. Might be true.

    This much is true, Linux is has been up and busy for the USPS for a while. Try reading this.

    The first part of the article;

    Linux is reading your mail

    John Taves, November 11, 1998

    The United States Postal Service deployed over 900 Linux based systems throughout the United States in 1997 to automatically recognize the destination addresses on mail pieces. Each system consists of 5 dual Pentium Pro 200MHz (PP200) computers and one single PP200 all running Linux.

    The USPS already had the mail piece scanners and some old custom computers that recognized the addresses. This project added the Linux computers to each scanner to run more modern OCR algorithms.

    -d [usps retired]

  202. This is fishy by crivens · · Score: 1

    This definitely is fishy to me. The article says they declined to renew the Lotus contract, but not why. I thought Notes had a good reputation for its groupware features. If the guy didn't think so, why didn't he go to Lotus and denounce them as he is Microsoft?

    Also, if they declined the Lotus contract last year, then they must have investigated and prototyped a bunch of systems to replace it with. With an $88b budget, surely they must have realised that Microsofts' products didn't suit them before they bought into them? If not, why not?

    Oh and which shareware products does he mean? He can't make such an accusation without backing up the statement. I think it's all sour grapes. I think he was sold by Microsoft's ad-men, bought into their software and then got burnt when the solution didn't work. Now he's trying to protect his arse by blaming MS. If not, prove me wrong, but without such a blanket statement.

    1. Re:This is fishy by crivens · · Score: 1

      Doh!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  203. Re:Not to turn this into a productive conversation by techwatcher · · Score: 1
    What I loved, and still use, is ECCO (PRO). A 32-bit version for W'95 was created and released... I have it... but then, of course, MS launched their "free" "Outlook" or whatever it was, and it was "game over" for Ecco (by Netmanage).

    I use Ecco, however, without taking advantage of its "group-ware" features, since others I work with don't have it. Had great reviews, though... I've also used the previously-Lotus now-IBM package (Organizer?), and didn't appreciate it at all. It's too clumsy, not customizable for effective individual use, not very intuitive.

    All these packages are actually forms of databases, anyway; groupware is database-with-networking features.

    Btw, I guess if /. moves up to the new XHTML standard, we'll all have to use <p> and <p/> for our comments longer than one paragraph?

  204. Re: negotiating strategy? No, single source issue by techwatcher · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the interpretation! I had missed that one.... 8-)

    Seriously, though, couldn't some bright young (i.e., quick) company put together a splendid batch of wearable computers with the upcoming Transmeta 5400, Linux OS, and custom apps specifically tailored for group-ware-type tasks? After all, a Navy ship seems like a good place to assume wireless computing can be used for effective communication/collaboration (as on the spaceship Enterprise!)....

  205. They should have realized that before... by moeffju · · Score: 0

    Before they sent out a ship carrying a Division-By-Zero WinNT steering server, and before buying the Microsoft Groupware products. As it's now, not that I like Microsoft, but this seems just as if the Navy was too stupid to test their software before buying.

    --
    follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju
  206. One (major) reason the Navy is unhappy by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    Yes, I believe the Navy is unhappy with MSFT. One reason is the Navy's love of their battle ships and Microsoft WinNT's penchant for crashing the entire ship!

    See this article about WinNT crashing the USS Yorktown.

    If that's not a mission critical system failure, what is?

    :-only kona in my cup-:
    :-robert taylor-:
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:One (major) reason the Navy is unhappy by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      I just noticed that both today's article and the article I referenced above are from the same Government news service (GCN).
      :-only kona in my cup-:
      :-robert taylor-:
      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  207. Good value? by druthers · · Score: 0

    As a US Federal computer specialist person and a fellow taxpayer with most of the readers here, maybe I am getting good value from the money I am paying this guy!

    --
    *** "It's only trivia until you need it." JMR ***
  208. This is not a Linux issue by possible · · Score: 1
    Sorry to put a damper on things, but this is not directly an issue of Linux vs. NT. The article does not say this, but it is obviously between Lotus Notes vs. Microsoft Exchange

    The DoD has been evaluating and testing software for DMS (Defense Messaging System) since at least late '94. DMS is a secure messaging and groupware specification based on Fortezza (smartcard) encryption and X.400 and X.500 mail and directory services.

    The prime contractor for this DoD project is Loral (or now Lockheed Martin), and the two competing subcontractors are Lotus and Microsoft.

    Microsoft has been trying to push Exchange as a groupware platform for a long time, but it really does not fit the bill nearly as well as Lotus Notes (or Domino). The operating systems are going to be Microsoft (because the DMS specifications call for a turnkey solution, and unfortunately Linux is not widely considered a turnkey OS). But at least Lotus' products run on most platforms, whereas Microsoft's products run only on Microsoft platforms.

    If I remember correctly, Hultin was a supporter of Lotus and was miffed when the Navy decided to switch gears and go with Microsoft (even though Lotus' products have fared better through all stages of Lockheed Martin's lab tests). Another example of Microsoft's influence over superior products.

    You can learn more about Lotus's solution at http://www.lmdms.com/. Or do a web search for "Defense Messaging System".

  209. Oh look, another Slashdot no-mind. by StatGrape · · Score: 1
    Truth hurts, doesn't it?

    Perhaps if you'd pull your head out of your ass, and get past the obvious fourth-grade education the original comment was written with, you'd see the underlying message.

    Slashdot threads participants are generally whiney, anally retentive bitches - plain and simple. Even the open source community whines and bitches at its own members in the equally worthless BSD vs. Linux 'debates'. Jesus, this might as well be the stupid AOL forums with the amount of completely useless nitpicking and jeuvenile namecalling.

    You make yourself look like a jackass by being condescending towards someone who is obviously right. I'm done, so feel free to get back to flaming the people you're not intelligent enough to debate legitimately.

    Oh, and flaming as an AC just makes you look stupider. Have a nice day.

    --

    NerdPerfect.com : breakfast of champions.

  210. I've looked at Win2000... by NatePWIII · · Score: 1

    and I'm not impressed. Its slow unstable and possibly even a worse operating system than it predessor NT 4.0 or Win98.
    We were thinking of putting up an NT server for people who want frontpage extensions. Then we realized just how big of a headache it was to maintain it, and we completely dropped the whole idea. I'm not sure I understand what you mean here about looking at W2K.
    Actually he would be better off by not looking and at least retain that "mirage" of a superior microsoft product in his head.


    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    NPS Internet Solutions, LLC
    www.npsis.com

    --

    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    www.haidacarver.com
    1. Re:I've looked at Win2000... by xtremex · · Score: 1

      We have an NT server for that very reason..and it IS one hell of a F**** to maintain...I've been using *NIX for years and I've been spoiled by the *NIXES..I get SOO mad when I can't just telnet into the NT box.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
  211. Will IBM play its Linux trump card? by ozbird · · Score: 1

    This would seem to be an ideal opportunity for IBM to offer a Linux solution in addition to the previously safe Microsoft "solution"? Sure, it probably won't be successful this time around (bureaucracy has more inertia than an aircraft carrier...) but it shows that they are serious about Linux and that they are listening to what the customer wants.

  212. Life is good in LinuxLand!! by Anonynous+Coward · · Score: 1
    Luckily, Linux has no decent, scalable, as-of-now-available, groupware products at all, saving us from being bashed by the Navy about their shoddy quality!!

    Also, its a good thing nobody really formally tests Linux and the software built on top of it in a typical server distribution (such as Apache, a mailer daemon, etc.)!! That lucky fact allows us to ignore that "Linux", taken as any actual distribution rather than just the kernel, very likely has as many, if not more, aggregrate bugs than W2K was reported as having!!!

    Oh yeah!!! Life is good in LINUXLAND!!!

  213. ITs about time by kaball · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has been consistantly making low quality software.I for one think the way their products make people expect less out of their software is unacceptable.I mean they have the public thinking system crashes are a "normal" part of operation. This my only be my opinion but we could all benefit if more people "told it like it is".THis being that microsoft cares nothing about quality and thats proven by me using it and expiriencing it for myself.So all you M$ "experts" can stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

    --
    ctrl+shift+S
  214. In defense of Microsoft by monsado · · Score: 1

    I am not exactly a flag waving MS zealot, but I have to disagree with Hultin. I work as an applications consultant, and one area of business I deal with frequently is messaging/groupware. I'm a big fan of cross-platform, open source, and shareware/freeware products, and I feel no love for companies like MS that rely on brilliant marketing rather than brilliant design to succeed. Still, I have to say that when a client asks for serious groupware features, the only packages that can meet those needs are the big three (Exchange, Domino, GroupWise). I think Hultin's statement makes great rhetoric, and I wish it were true, but I think he needs to take another look at what is out there and what capabilities it has.

    Many times I have seen implementations that would have been great open source solutions go the way of proprietary software just because of the lack of readily available groupware packages. (Coders take note.)

    That's just my $.02. Flame on.

  215. Frontpage for Apache... by -benjy · · Score: 1

    ...can be found here

    http://www.rtr.com/fpsupport/index.html

    Hopefully, this will let you wean yourself from NT.

  216. Re:Good value? - NOT by bsqtsnfr · · Score: 1
    Well, I'm definitely a taxpayer. If you are a US Fed. Comp. specialist, please keep getting the word out. I choose not to throw my money away, and I'd prefer it if our elected officials had similar values...

    as far as this "bolt-on portal, knowledge mgmt. stuff" goes, we are definitley back at a point where we need to be reconsidering if COTS truly reduces TCO! I contend it doesn't.. Linux/Perl/DBI/Python/Zope/Sendmail/Apache.. it's all there.. our govt. decision makers (as well as industry captains) are making poor decisions..there will be accountability in the end (I hope)

    regards,
    bsqtsnfr

  217. They aren't that far off. by Trollok · · Score: 1

    Hmm, lets see... Microsoft takes in 15 billion dollars a year in net profit and the U.S. Navy takes in 80 billion dollars a year in tax revenue. So far it looks like the navy is ahead but Microsoft could concieveably catch up. Of course to the Navys credit they are backed up with weapons of mass destruction and the rest of the U.S government. Oh yeah, and they are the customer (customer is always right) and they have great alternatives to Micrsofts products (OSS). .................................................. ..................................................

    --
    Me a troll, me no gnome, me smash ye head and break ye bones.
  218. Sendmail is not groupware by clink · · Score: 1

    I don't know what this guy is talking about but sendmail doesn't have the features required to be considered groupware. At the minimum, you'd have to add calendaring to it.

  219. What we need on Linux to replace Windoze by The+Big+Bopper · · Score: 1

    I am the sysadmin at a rapidly growing high tech firm. Our hardware design engineers have been working diligently with NT, and cursing it frequently as it will die two hours into a simulation. Our design tools are mostly available on Linux, and the few that aren't will run on our Solaris boxes which is a similar user experience. They only need to understand one interface.

    There are some key areas though where we need Linux-based solutions and don't currently seem to have any.

    1) Visio - We do use Visio on NT quite extensively and need something like it on Linux. It doesn't have to be open source.

    2) Single sign on - You're gonna shreik but MS is going to have the best solution in terms of Active Directory. Using NSS and PAM we hope to have Linux users authenticated by a Win2K server. Samba as an NT domain controller is still quite immature, and doesn't scale well across the enterprise.

    3) MS Outlook - Our company depends heavily on Outlook. The integration between E-mail, calendar, and delegated tasks is a godsend to us and works precisely how we want it to. We're in a bit of a pickle on how we're ever going to share calendars and delegate tasts between Windows and Linux users. We need to have a groupware product that does all of this and runs on all platforms.

    There's more, of course, but those are the big ones.

  220. Re: arg html by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    Y'know I'm not sure but it seems like it 'happened' the same day someone managed to post porno images in comments.

    That was fun, I'm at work skimming /. and I see some woman slurping down on some guy's giant prick. Not that I wouldn't normally enjoy seeing something like that but I also enjoy being able to pay the mortgage and buy food and stuff and my employer has a habit of firing people who browse porno at work.

    Just a guess, but maybe there was some hole in /. that someone found and the quickest way to stop it was to pull the html/text posting thingy.

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  221. Mission Critical on an OS that CRASHES?! by coelocanth · · Score: 1

    I'm not into bashing any specific OS for it's bugs or shortcomings - but who the hell implemented a mission critical computer without (1) A backup server (2) Non-cascading program threads (3) Using an OS that crashes? When I was in the Navy, the guy who specified NT would have been taken out to the flight deck and shot for treason. We used UNIX, with a backup mainframe. It was NEVER down - it would hang on occasion, bottlenecks up the wazoo, but never crashed. What's this world come to? Truly a sad state of affairs.

    I've been crunching on a box for 15 years and this still confounds me. Micro$oft obviously has been selected by a number of companies because they can actually share information with other companies. Too bad IBM didn't partner with Xerox, or we MIGHT have a good, multi-threaded OS with a quality GUI, AND have the software to run on it. Instead, we have one OS that virtually all software runs on, and a multitude of fragmented platforms with truly good OS running on them.

    If you want to create a revolution in the industry, quit bickering about who has the best OS and start leveraging your voice to make change happen. Linux is great, but what software suite runs on it? How about RedHat...still few offerings. My favorite GUI OS, BeOS, still has a scant offering of software. Unfortunetly, I have to run a triple-boot machine to be happy AND be functional with the rest of the world.

    Now, who out there is going to take the concepts of Linux and UNIX, in a stable, multi-threaded environment, couple them with the ease of a GUI like RedHat, MacOS and RedHat, add the elegance of BeOS and DesqView, and put their money where their mouth is and MARKET the damn thing? If you do, we'll all be forking out the dollars until Sculley or Jobs find you and shoot you. Hell, I'll even bring a fresh pot of daisies to your funeral.

    Just a little venting, IMHO...

    Software, the easiest way to be forced to do it their way.