Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Funded by NSA, Helps Spy on Win Users?

OpperNerd writes "A French intelligence report has accused U.S. secret agents of working with computer giant Microsoft to develop software allowing Washington to spy on communications around the world. According to the report, 'It would seem that the creation of Microsoft was largely supported, not least financially, by the NSA, and that IBM was made to accept the (Microsoft) MS-DOS operating system by the same administration.'" I personally don't believe this is true, but it's an interesting enough rumor to post for discussion. (SFX: Black helicopters whirring overhead.)

264 comments

  1. X-dot files by aav · · Score: 1

    Why does this seem familiar ?
    Because it was stated in a X-files episode long time ago. I saw it by chance (I'm not a X-files fan) about 2 years ago.
    That much for the french intelligence, I guess

    1. Re:X-dot files by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1
      It's from the French. What do you expect?
      If there was a French company, Micro-crossaint, that was dominating the software industry, do you think they'd be crying?

      This from a country that thinks Jerry Lewis is a national treasure.

      -=-=-=-=-=-=-
      This signature contains text from the worlds funniest signature.

    2. Re:X-dot files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all the stupid american people over there that think that they are the only ones in this world to be modern, sorry to disapoint you but you are only bastard europeans and your nation would not even be a nation without us. Than keep on being clever in slashdot forums and don't start criticising people about their nationalities, but for instance try to argue and see yourself in the mirror!!!

    3. Re:X-dot files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the "stupid American people" that died twice this century (2000 is the last year of the 20th century) saving French bacon. And in gratitude, the Vichy French troops fired on American GIs in Algiers during WWII. ptoo

    4. Re:X-dot files by deboute · · Score: 1

      the jerry lewis thing is only an legend.

      very few people know who is jerry lewis in france

    5. Re:X-dot files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey froggie, If I do recall my history correctly if it weren't for OUR intervention on your behalf TWICE in the earlier half of this century you'd all be Germans. How's that for owing your national existence to someone else.

    6. Re:X-dot files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You indeed do not know your history. The US intervened in 44 to get to Berlin before the Russians and prevent them from getting a sphere of direct influence in Western Europe, like the one you guys have in South America and are not so talkative about. Look it up at 'Monroe doctrine', you'll see. When asked in 1940 to defend France, the US politely declined because the Russians were weak and it was close to an election year. As to the 1st WW, it is now proven that the american reinforcement in 1917 did not change anything in the course of the war. British and French armored vehicles did. So, to summarize, you don't know anything. You tak and talk and get all patriotic, waving your stupid flag like Americans love to. Go on, get all cocky about the US being so big. Look at all the people sleeping in the streets in your country, the rate of illiteracy, the 15% of people who cannot afford health insurance. Now, your economy is doing great. When you'll be flipping burgers in a few years, you won't be so proud. And Europe will still be the same. First economical power with the European Union, a population of 340 million, a culture and history you will never surpass. I'd rather die French than live American.

  2. Conspiracy by afflatus_com · · Score: 1

    There will be some fun times in alt.conspiracy.microsoft for the next few days over this one.

    ---
    "And the beast shall be made legion. Its numbers shall be increased a thousand thousand fold."

    --

    -----
    Cast a Cold Eye
    On Life, on Death
    Horseman, pass by
    --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
  3. That would back up the nsa.key claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remember that second backup crypto key called NSA? ahah.. Software vendors should be held responsable when some programming mistakes are exploited to compromise systems! There is no difference at all between a backdoor to let intruder connect and copying data from a client process to a buffer without boundcheck, you get the the same result! You will go to jail for incorporating nasty backdoor but you'll get away by making it look like a mistake even if it compromises completely the security mechanisms in place. gaius@hert.org

    1. Re:That would back up the nsa.key claims by Biff+Cool · · Score: 1
      The whole NSA key thing makes no sense though there were a hundred things that the NSA could do to get Microsoft to give them access to a computer, that were easier than just having their own key put in. And neither the NSA nor Microsoft would be dumb enough to actually name a the key NSAKEY if it were what everyone thought it was.

      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.

      --

      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
      -- H. L. Mencken

    2. Re:That would back up the nsa.key claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's good reasoning. It can't be the case because Microsoft wouldn't be dumb enough. Hahahahahaha.... I'm falling out of my chair. Hahahahahaha....

    3. Re:That would back up the nsa.key claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think it's entirely plausible that they WOULD name it something horribly conspicuous. The idea behind this is that anyone who sees it will dismiss it as too ridiculous to be true.

      Meanwhile, now that your attentions are diverted...

      -- Michael Maxwell

  4. More conspiracy websites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.thewholetruth.com

    have a read.

    www.trufax.org too

    Remember, humans ARE EVIL!!! and given power and opertunity will FUCK you-all to death, coz everyone knows that there ar ea lot of morons out there. Why does the NSA hire all the best math dudes? Why are no NSA employees spilling the beans? Coz they love their high pay rates and dont want their parents killed.

    1. Re:More conspiracy websites... by PolyWog · · Score: 1

      I have long ago resolved that humans are evil. This is because they are greedy. Then you must ask why they are greedy... because they are animals. The current socio-economic system in place here in America is a self-destructive system. It's bound to fail due to the polar extremities of the socio-economic class structure. This is directly to blame for the type of Inhuman corporations that we have today (very McDonaldized.)

      The Irony in all of this seems to be that despite the companies' insistence that more Calculability, Predictability, Control will yield greater efficiency this is not the case. Here is where the irrationality of rationality comes forth and its stench reigns.

      Over rationalization works only to dehumanize society, for personal profit of the corporate class (the Capitalists.) It is intended to keep the humans around long enough only to strip them of the ability to create, to practice skills and offer judgement. Ultimately, it replaces humans with technology.

      --
      All of this is, of course, IMNSHO. Cheers, Elmo
    2. Re:More conspiracy websites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Once again, yet another slashdot follower finds it difficult to understand that there is a *significant* difference between Capitalism and Corporatism.

      No, I'm NOT going to type out the explanation again, just think about it...

      -- Michael Maxwell

    3. Re:More conspiracy websites... by rsborg · · Score: 1

      FYI: Capitalism is an *unstable* form of economy, that can easily reduce (assume total lassez-faire market) to monopolies which results in plutocracy that rewards Corporatist behavior.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  5. uh, Not Dos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    -- alangrimes@starpower.net DOS simply isn't capable of doing any spying whatsoever. Windows 3.11 has more back-doors than a highschool but I don't think its a conspiracy. Windows 95+, where everybody has to use the same dialer and network 'stack' VERY suspicious... I use windows 3.11

  6. that would suck!! by bdumm · · Score: 1

    Imagine your first day on the job at No Such Agency.... Your first assignment is to go to Redmond, WA. to work with the MS development teams.... :->

  7. Windows -- may be, DOS -- no way by srk · · Score: 3

    I can believe that there can be something like that in Windows but I doubt that it was possible to hide just anything in DOS. DOS is too small and too simple. Also it was reverse engineered sooooo many times. BTW, does anybody know if there are any pieces of DOS code which purpose is unknown or unclear?

    1. Re:Windows -- may be, DOS -- no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there are any pieces of DOS code whose purpose was unclear. Loads of it no doubt

    2. Re:Windows -- may be, DOS -- no way by JohnFred · · Score: 1


      ", does anybody know if there are any pieces of DOS code which purpose is unknown or unclear? "

      Only the ARRD detection code :-)

      --
      /usr/games/fortune > ~/.signature
    3. Re:Windows -- may be, DOS -- no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, when was MS-DOS open-sourced?

  8. Heinlein Would Say: by Crutcher · · Score: 3

    Never attribute to malice what can be accounted for by stupidity.

    It would be nice to believe that the buggy security was deliberate, but I just don't.

    --

    -- Crutcher --
    #include <disclaimer.h>
    1. Re:Heinlein Would Say: by QuMa · · Score: 1

      Heinlein said "What do you want from me? I'm just a Monkey."???

      Gosh, you learn someting every day.

    2. Re:Heinlein Would Say: by Shotnicam · · Score: 1
      Never attribute to malice what can be accounted for by stupidity.

      doesnt m$ have some of the more intelligent employees out there? as i understand it, they give an basic iq test during the interview by asking different kinds of questions and judging the quickness and correctness of the responses "why are manhole covers round?" anyone?

      because of this, i believe the average m$ employee iq is around 130 (which is about the 98th %, which is what mensa requires for membership)

      i still dont like them though... they may be marketing geniuses, but tend to swing the other way when it comes to software (just to reiterate that point)

      no .sig please
      gary

      no .sig please

    3. Re:Heinlein Would Say: by kabloie · · Score: 1

      Oooh, Oooh, pick me!

      "why are manhole covers round?" anyone?

      So you can move the fucking things? (wheel/least mass, etc.)

      kabloie

  9. A new Pink Panther movie? by link2NULL · · Score: 3

    Sounds to me like Inspector Clouseau is heading up the French Defence Ministry these days.

  10. It just might be true... by Ost99 · · Score: 2

    Hmmm... the NSA key in WinNT sure springs to mind. And there was that unfortunate "bug" in the first release of Win98, which sent a lot of info to Microsoft, about user activities. Scary.

    We'll just have to use Linux and PGP when we plan assassinations and cyber terrorism.

    Ost99

    The above text is written in Word97.... [Sound of black helicopters]

    --
    ---- Sig. gone.
    1. Re:It just might be true... by Stary · · Score: 1
      And there was that unfortunate "bug" in the first release of Win98, which sent a lot of info to Microsoft, about user activities. Scary.

      Would be nice to think that such a thing would create some noise... do you have any facts to back that up (as in, reports/articles/more info on how and what was actually sent/etc) or is it just one of those i-dont-like-MS-rumours?

      Now trust me, dont like M$ at all, which is why I'd be very interested in some hard facts on the subject.

      --
      Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest
    2. Re:It just might be true... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

      Not only does m$ get a whole shitload of info from your PC when you login to they're 'Update' site, our 'friend' AOL also creates a huge database of info on your pc and uploads it when you connect the first time. Filemon is such a wonderful program. And is it a coincidence that AOL's mainframes are physically located so close to the CIA and NSA? They realize that the really good programmers won't ' work for the facists' .(A quote from Teller, the first time he quit work on the fusion bomb.) So, they have to make sure they aren't overthrown somehow!

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    3. Re:It just might be true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The registration wizard in the orginal Win98 sent hardware info to MS. They later released an update to remove that info.

      http://support.micro soft.com/support/kb/articles/Q226/3/64.ASP

  11. Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, isn't it? With some sectors, there's only a handful of BIG companies controlling most that high-tech sector. For example with cellphone manufacturers there's Nokia, Ericsson and Motorola.

    If I were a Spook Agency[tm] and wanted to employ means to control the masses, I'd pump money into selected companies who are in my leech and do not object to my agenda. And so they could innovate new and snazzy products with nice little features, such as for example cars with GPS positioning capabilities. (To prevent theft? To know where you are!)

    Anyway, whose purpose does it serve to have huge giants like AOL/Time Warner?

  12. NSA Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    65,000 backdoors and a security fix update every 90 days.

  13. Yeah right! by Paladeen · · Score: 2

    Yeah....and then Marilyn Monroe was murdered by J Edgar Hoover, the Martians really are watching us, the NSA can tap any phone in the world and the government is an evil oppressive force that keeps extensive records on the number of times you visit the bathroom..

    What a load of BS....

    Let's face it....it was Gates who made MS, for better or worse.

    1. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's face it....it was Gates who made MS, for better or worse.

      And now Mr. Gates is a puppet of the NSA, Mr. Ballmer is a thumb puppet of Mr. Gates, and your W2K computer is a puppet of all three!

      No more secret family cooking recepies! Gates knows all!

    2. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the FBI can tap any phone in the USA. Not sure whether the NSA can do that anywhere in the world, but I am sure the NSA can do that *many* places in the world.

    3. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually knew anything about TelCo equipment you would know that it's quite easy to take any phone call or data communication and duplicate it. All you have to do is put the right equipment in the right place.

    4. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While this is true, do you know how expense it would be to tap every phone line in the US, much less the world. How expense it would be to save and track all of those conversations. How hard it would be to keep creating lexicons for all of the ever changing street language (in English, Spannish, Ebonics, and a host of other languages). How hard it would be to keep the army of trackers silent.

      All organizations try to control the members of organization with control of information. This is true of coutries, religions, companies and educational institutes. Maybe NSA and MS want you to think they can monitor all of your computer activities, that might scary you in to not doing things that might get you in to trouble. It is like red light cameras, after three months of having red light cameras, out come the fake red light cameras. All the sudden people comply because of what could happen. nsa.key might just be a trick to make people think of what could happen.

      Big Brother isn't some stranger you don't know, more often than not it is ourselvies.

    5. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For many years you can reroute or tap any phone line through software. You phone call to your neighbor can, and often is, routed through a neighboring state, especially if you have a digital line, such as ISDN.

    6. Re:Yeah right! by sethdelackner · · Score: 1

      If you doubt the veracity of any of this, I suggest sending the original story, in french to babelfish.
      Notice that France's Minister of Defense is quoted saying they had outside experts investigate the whole report.

      Some of you may be happy to sit back and make inane jokes about France's backwardness, but they have:
      * nuclear missiles.
      * their own version of the CIA.
      * the Eurofighter (equivalent performance to the next-generation fighter jets the US Congress is still arguing over whether to put into mass production).
      ---------------
      Not to mention a certain popular distribution:
      * Mandrake.

      And if you'll recall, they pulled out of Vietnam just in time for us to jump in.

    7. Re:Yeah right! by Paladeen · · Score: 1

      And all of this is a good thing.

      The US keeps bitching that "we Europeans" can't take care of ourselves, and need their "constant protection". Europe is getting an army and is propably going to pool their arsenal of nukes. The Eurofighter, by the way, is superior to current US jet fighters when it comes to maneuverability and speed. All European states have had relatively efficient and professional intelligence services since World War 2.

      Europe isn't backwards. It's just different. Many Americans fail to realise that by the rest of the world's standards they are fat, lazy and with an economy that is grossly unjust and encourages an inequal distribution of wealth....not to mention America's opressive way of forcing its culture on everyone else.

      I know I'm gonna get flamed, spammed, murdered, butchered...you mention it...but this is the way it is....so sorry.

    8. Re:Yeah right! by JordanH · · Score: 2
      • And all of this is a good thing.

      I agree. I'm all for stronger European nations. The true Democracies don't involve themslves in wars.

      I'm not concerned about a strong Europe. I'm more afraid of a weak one.

      • The US keeps bitching that "we Europeans" can't take care of ourselves, and need their "constant protection". Europe is getting an army and is propably going to pool their arsenal of nukes.

      Well, I'm sure that "you Europeans" hate being painted with a broad brush as much as people in "The US" do.

      I do know a lot of people who wonder why the United States bears the brunt of responsibility for fighting wars that, if there were any equity, would be at least as much Europe's responsibility (Kosovo, The Gulf War).

      • Europe isn't backwards. It's just different. Many Americans fail to realise that by the rest of the world's standards they are fat, lazy ... <rant about how horrible Americans are deleted>

      I'm don't think that "fat and lazy" are fair characterizations of Americans as a whole. We work more hours than Europeans and I think we can be proud of our many high technology achievements. I've worked in Europe and I didn't notice people working any harder there than I see in the US.

      But, if Eurocentric bigots want to look down their noses at us, I doubt that any arguement I could make would be of any help.

      • ...not to mention America's opressive way of forcing its culture on everyone else.

      Yes, Americans are clever the way we force all those European TV networks to carry Melrose Place. Face it, nobody forces American culture on anybody who doesn't buy it.

      The only coercion I see in cultural matters is how various governments around the world forbid American (and other foreign) culture from being allowed in their country because given the choice, the people might freely choose the foreign culture.


      -Jordan Henderson

    9. Re:Yeah right! by spudgun · · Score: 1

      And 2 french Agents Sunk the Rainbow Warrior (Green Peace's Flagship) in Auckland New Zealand killing one crew member
      Sinking an Unarmed ship in a friendly port in peace time that was protesting your south pacific nuclear testing.
      Wonder if this is the same French Intelegence ?

      there is such a thing as too much paranoia you know

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    10. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, pal, like it or not, Greenpeace was told to get out of that area because the french were going to set off an A-bomb there. The only way they could get them out is by sinking their sorry-ass boat with an unarmed torpedo (it just punched a hole through the hull, didn't even detonate), again, after they'd been repeatedly warned of the consequences of being in those waters. If you want my opinion, they should have just left them there and blown the nuke anyway. I lay the blame for this one on Greenpeace. When a foriegn navy tells you to move at the point of a gun, you do it.

    11. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They NSA doesn't recored every telephone conversation the system is set up 2 listen 4 certain keywords like: president, assasinate, bomb...u c the patern an it logz an records those conversations only

    12. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if our country is so fat lazy an unjust then y does every1 move hear?

    13. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone ?

      well it sounds like _you_ have never been _out_ of _there_

    14. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because hungry people working in sweatshops like fat and lazy countries.

    15. Re:Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. The RW was anchored in a port, while the crew (except for one unfortunate who had returned to pick up a camera) was on shore.

  14. Frogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to tell the french that Frogger was just a game, not a spying tool against their country.

  15. Laser printers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like the story from the Gulf War... that laser printers sold to Iraq during the 1980s had homing devices in them that were used to guide smart bombs and cruise missles into their targets during the war.

    1. Re:Laser printers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard the laser printer stuff, but I do know that Xerox repair men during the cold war would plant cameras in the Xerox machines over in Russia, like at the Kremlin, etc. Some times you just have to be careful if you're doing stuff you want secret. For instance, using a closed-sourced operating system is beyond doubt stupid. Oh, and just 'cause DOS has been imitated does *not* mean all of its secrets have. No wond' the government has worked so long to allow Bill to have a monopoly in the OS biz. UCITA.

  16. Hahahah by FallLine · · Score: 2

    Ahhha Funny! =)~

  17. That far fetched ? by FrankW · · Score: 4

    Yes, the theory sounds a bit like something from X-files, and the french are known to, well not exactly like the US,

    BUT

    When people were speculating about ECHOLON a few years back, many also said it was nothing but conspiracy theories (and the first time its existance was officially admitted, was due to a question in the european parliament).

    Secondly, it is generally assumed (or known) that the CIA shifted considerable effort into spying out foreign companies, and passing secret business information on to american companies, when the Cold War faded. That even lead to several american diplomats being "asked to leave" Germany (and yes the French do the same, ask Siemens about the ICE/TGV competition...)

    Hence I think it would be wrong to immediately dismiss any thought of cooperation between Microsoft and some US Goverment agency.

    I admit I don't believe that IBM was forced to accept MS-DOS as part of some master plan by the NSA to spy on the world, but rather that once MS was becoming so succesful, some agency recognized the potential...

    And even if there are no backdoors etc, getting detailed inside knowledge about the protocols, formats, api's etc directly from the source would be a great help to NSA, CIA, etc.

    After all, spying really IS the business of those organizations, and thinking they are only interested in other spies and terrorists would be quite naive...

    Just my $0.02

    Frank

  18. Uh oh! Here come the UN storm troops! by browser_war_pow · · Score: 0

    And we are heading to a 1 world government because the UN storm troops are going to overthrow the federal government and our world will be run by the socialist bankers who will implement the antichrist's 1 world-1 currency system. Yawn. Apparently someone has too much time on their hands if they make allegations like that. I doubt Microsoft would build NSA surveillance software into Windows. If it was proven that they did they would be either driven out of business by lawsuits or they would be so disgraced not even their best marketting people could get their good name back in the eyes of the public.

    1. Re:Uh oh! Here come the UN storm troops! by svennieboy · · Score: 1

      >into Windows. If it was proven that they did
      >they would be either driven out of business by
      >lawsuits or they would be so disgraced not even
      >their best marketting people could get their
      >good name back in the eyes of the public.

      You think so? They are getting away with selling operating systems full of bugs for like fifteen years already! And still they are the most popular software company... Do you think so many people would suddenly change their operating system because they know "certain information" about what they do is monitored?
      If all people were that smart and had that much knowledge (Windows is an operating system that can even be used by a complete computer newbie), everyone would be using linux by now :)

      svEn

      --
      -- Slackware linux... because wizards are for wussies
    2. Re:Uh oh! Here come the UN storm troops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody's been watching too many religion shows.

    3. Re:Uh oh! Here come the UN storm troops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was proven that they did they would be either driven out of business by lawsuits or they would be so disgraced not even their best marketting people could get their good name back in the eyes of the public.

      Here's a thought what would they switch to? Linux is not ready for mainstream use yet. I can't see any of my neighbors ever using Linux until it is as easy as Windoze. It took me a good year or so to get used to Linux. I guess all us Linux people could cash in by teaching the masses about Linux. :) I guess they could use macs but I wouldn't be to surprised if the NSA had backdoors into OS*.

      fozzytbear@yahoo.com, IRC:fozzman or fozzy

    4. Re:Uh oh! Here come the UN storm troops! by BrightSun · · Score: 1

      eh.
      if ms-dos had flopped alot of things in regards to OS's would be different. Linux and/or *nix

      but if *nix was predominant first everyone would be using it and would be discussing the relearning of OS's to use winblows because the NSA had corrupted *nix's to be able to spy on the masses.

      *up long time thought processes fading please dont moderate me down to much im making a valid attempt at a rational and intelligent thought*

      guess its a woulda coulda shoulda

      if the masses were made to use a *nix they'd do what it takes to work the system
      especially when the net boom came along
      or maybe it would have kept is simple less clogged and more closer to what us geeks wanted originally .

      wouldn't that be nice?

      hmmmmmmm

      --
      Computers save man alot of guesswork, but so does the bikini ;)
    5. Re:Uh oh! Here come the UN storm troops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of my neigbours can't use Windows. I hate to say this but anybody who thinks Windows is easy has never tried to fix something. Windows is okay when it runs but when it doesn't. Oh boy can it get interesting. Worse when it does have problems usually nobody knows why. It's just reboot or worse re-install the OS. A well setup Linux system ends up being less of a hassle to newbies. Most people don't install new video/printers/etc every day so that doesn't matter a great deal. If somebody just creates a nice front end to fsck in single user mode most users would have less problems with Linux then Windows. The odd time something screws up [be it a power failure or something worse] that fsck can scare people. The only real issue right now is the need for some apps. Being able to pick up something like Quicken or a game at the local store. It's getting there but we ain't there yet. Think about it. How hard is it to actually use a Linux system? I don't mean to admin it but to just use it. You turn it on. Log in and start using your apps. If the Corel office suite has the same look and feel of the Windows problem the only thing you will notice is it doesn't crash.

  19. Consider the source by WarmProp · · Score: 1

    Check the "Breaking News" section on your right and you'll see this publication is not exactly up there amongst CNNs and the like, but I enjoyed the 'news' anyway for some reason :)

    1. Re:Consider the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Consider the source"

      Was the exact same answer I got from a senior person after inquiring about Menwith Hill.

      Your silence is appreciated.

    2. Re:Consider the source by CorranW · · Score: 1

      The Age is one of the two or three most reputable papers in Australia. As far as journalistic integrity, independence and so forth go, it would compare well with just about any other major English language paper you care to name.

      Of course, the story itself looks like it's taken directly from the AFP wire; and the AFP is up there amongst the CNNs and the like. AFP is also French, and so will likely have pro-French biases.

      But considering the sources, they're reputable, so it's likely that the French Defence Ministry did, in fact, say what the story claims they said.

      Whether the French government is correct is another matter...

  20. The bright side by Kaufmann · · Score: 4

    Okay. The bad news is, Microsoft software users are being spied on. But everybody fails to see the practical benefits of this. So here are the Top Five good things about Microsoft and the NSA teaming together:

    * All the software will already know your personal habits and information, therefore freeing you from the hassle of having to perform configuration.

    * In time, all NSA programming staff will develop chronic psychosis (sp?) from prolonged exposure to the Windows sources.

    * They can investigate user habits to find out what kind of graphical user interface is best suited to desktop users. And if even without this information they were able to create such great things as MS Bob (tm) and the Office Assistant, I can't help but wonder what great stuff may come next!

    * Windows Millenium will come with earmuffs, to keep the constant noise from the black helicopters from blowing up your inner ear.

    And last but not least, the Best Thing about Microsoft and the NSA teaming together:

    * If the Shadow Government computers that run Echelon are Windows boxes, then you have nothing to worry about - by the time they recover from the BSOD, you'll already have hung up the phone!

    ---

    (Why only five, you ask? Well, I'm not _that_ creative. It's an open list ("open source", much like Al Gore's campaign site), so feel free to add to it.)

    --
    To the editors: your English is as bad as your Perl. Please go back to grade school.
    1. Re:The bright side by chandler · · Score: 1
      You can already see the fruits of this productive partnership in Internet Exploder 4.0: After you install it, the next time you logon it pops up a status box saying "Setting up personalized settings for: Internet Explorer". But it never asks you for any settings! One can only assume that the NSA has already preprogrammed your settings into IE to make your life easier.



      "The romance of Silicon Valley was about money - excuse me, about changing the world, one million dollars at a time."

      --

      Visit

  21. DOS -- Way. by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 3
    If there had been a more robust OS than MS-DOS, this could prevent security exploits.

    The non-existent security of MS-DOS caused an utter lack of security to proliferate around the world.

    Whether black helicopters were involved or not is a whole other question...

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    1. Re:DOS -- Way. by Phil-14 · · Score: 1

      What are you saying, Chris? That CP/M had
      better inherent security? AFAIK Unix wasn't
      a competitor for the first PC OS.

      --
      (currently testing something about signatures here)
    2. Re:DOS -- Way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW There was a version of Xenix that ran on 8086 systems. Radio Shack sold a three user version of System III [Might have been 7 or even Xenix. You don't expect me to remember that far back do you?] that ran on a 5mhz 68000. While Xenix would have been much more expensive then CPM/86 was it did exist. I think the price difference was a factor of 2-3X. That would have been a base system that needed the "powerfull" XT to run on.

    3. Re:DOS -- Way. by fvzappa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Xenix was made by... MICROSOFT... and became SCO Unix eventually.

  22. "(SFX: Black helicopters whirring overhead)" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But everyone knows that they don't make any sound! Didn't Mel Gibson teach you anything?

    Where's my Catching in the Rye...

    1. Re:"(SFX: Black helicopters whirring overhead)" by fsck · · Score: 1

      You mean Catcher In The Rye?

      Conspiracy Theory is a great movie! And Julia Roberts is yummy in it too!

      --

      Lars - ...I could always phone Linus when I had a problem.
  23. Guess the NSA convinced Kildall to go flying... by stx23 · · Score: 1

    on the day IBM were shopping for an OS.
    Additionally:-
    it would seem that the creation of Microsoft was largely supported, not least financially, by the NSA.
    Did the NSA really have a clue at this point in time, I thought the development of Microsoft was the acceptance of Basic in boxes like the Altair and the C64, which I would doubt the NSA would have had much interest in at the time, unless they wanted to check you were taking proper care of your Sims^H^H^H^HLittle Computer People...

    1. Re:Guess the NSA convinced Kildall to go flying... by Zoltar · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole "Kildall was out of the office so they went with Microsoft" one of those urban legends that isn't totally true.

      If you think about it, if your a large company and you are looking to bundle an OS with your PC, that's a HUGE decision. Are you really going to go with choice B just because you can't immediatly get hold of choice A? It makes for an interesting story, but it just doesn't ring true if you think it through.

      Kinda makes me wonder what the PC indsutry would be like if they had bundled CP/M instead of QDOS though...

    2. Re:Guess the NSA convinced Kildall to go flying... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      If you think about it, if your a large company and you are looking to bundle an OS with your PC, that's a HUGE decision. Are you really going to go with choice B just because you can't immediatly get hold of choice A? It makes for an interesting story, but it just doesn't ring true if you think it through.

      Large corporation or not, business is still conducted by people. The ability to feel 'safe' when dealing with a company or individual is crucial when you are making a deal. It is not at all far fetched to me that as a result of this incident, as well as their response from Microsoft and Gates that they decided that Microsoft (and Gates) were people that were a better fit with their way of doing things.

    3. Re:Guess the NSA convinced Kildall to go flying... by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      The alternate story I heard was "Kildall was too drunk and told IBM where to shove their NDA."

      True or not, that story fits better because it would give the blue suits enough justification to pass on the leading microcomputer OS, and go with MS's clone.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    4. Re:Guess the NSA convinced Kildall to go flying... by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1


      Microsoft also offered DOS to IBM essentially for free. (The catch was that MS retained distribution rights.)

      Since IBM didn't really think the OS was all that important in the big picture, it probably seemed like an excellent deal to them at the time. Of course, Microsoft was already aware of the 'cloning' opportunities.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  24. Fascism 2.0 sucks by Jett · · Score: 1

    How did this world get so messed up? Maybe Bill Gates REALLY is The AntiChrist :)

    Ok, so assuming this is true, and in light of Echelon and all of the other strange stuff the NSA/CIA/FBI/ATF gets accused of, what is the better method of doing things? How should these organizations be operating in a free society in which computers and networking are an every day part of life? Or better yet: How should these organizations run to prevent Fascism 2.0 from taking over the world?

    1. Re:Fascism 2.0 sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but by creating these privacy-invasion tools, these organizations ARE Fascism 2.0.

      The NSA/CIA/FBI/ATF work everyday to make sure this society is not free.

  25. Well sure... by Skald · · Score: 2
    After all, we need to keep tabs on these people; they could be a direct threat to American citizens. What if there's another "Le Car" in the works?

    --

    "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." - Alexander Hamilton

    1. Re:Well sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is "Le Car"?

    2. Re:Well sure... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
      What is "Le Car"?

      The name under which the Renault 5 was sold in the US at one time. (Too bad they didn't sell the R5 Turbo - a wacky idea done as, I think, a homologation special; move the engine from the front to behind the driver, make it drive the rear wheels rather than the front wheels, and turbocharge the hell out of it - here.)

  26. But... by scrutty · · Score: 3
    Not that I am trying to stand up for this theory in any way, but not having read the actual report the link summarises, but I think you might have a hold of the wrong end of the handle.

    I don't think for a second that the authors are suggesting that DOS contained hidden security back doors. Look at the paragraph where DOS is mentioned.

    it would seem that the creation of Microsoft was largely supported, not least financially, by the NSA, and that IBM was made to accept the (Microsoft) MS-DOS operating system by the same administration.

    I infer from this that the creation of a dominant controlling software company overseeing PC operating sytems was the aim,and to further this scheme IBM was persuaded to use MS operating sytems on their incumbent PC platform. In this way a spook controlled company would be delivering the OS that was in use on the majority of the worlds desktop computers. Even if that operating system contained nothing shady on initial delivery, maybe enough foresight allowed them to realise that in later years it would be easy enough to slip in features like the famous NSA key as these devices became more powerful and networked.

    Establish an initial base camp in the foothills , so to speak and there's no real harm done if nothing comes of it.

    Still it all seems a bit far fetched to me. Now, if they'd suggested extraterrestrial involvement or drug money on the other hand . . . :o)

    --
    -- Oh Well
    1. Re:But... by Mr_Ceebs · · Score: 1

      So what they're saying is that an advance in technology that no one anticipated as selling to the extent that it has. relying on technology that was yet to be invented got funded by the government. and they are using this technology on the grounds that everyone has it. even though the majority of the components are manufactured in other countries.

      Don't you think some other country would have squealed yet? Were they paying the Russian government throughout the 80's not to tell people that they'd implanted spying devices in everyone's computers? I think we should be told.

      Apart from that. If this is true. do they fancy funding my interdimensional periscope. which will allow them to look up from the floor of any office building in the world? I'll let them fund me for the minor ammount of $500 million but theres a chance this groundbreaking technology may not work......

  27. Why windows isn't a spy tool. by RAruler · · Score: 1

    Windows can't be a spy tool, its inherently secure, due to its igenious MSMD, More Security through More Downtime.

    --

    --
    Insert Witty Sig Here
  28. clarification by Jett · · Score: 1

    When I said "assuming this is true" I was referring to the article, NOT to my previous statement about Bill Gates being The AntiChrist. Clearly Marilyn Manson has him beat on that position :)
    www.marilynmanson.net
    antichrist or not, the guy is definitly an interesting artist.

    1. Re:clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Artist my ass.

    2. Re:Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which begs the question: "why hasn't the chinese gov't blocked anonymizer and proxymate?"

      I find it hard to believe that they are THAT clueless.

  29. Even if it's true, who cares? by SlamboS · · Score: 1

    It's not like they are going to use it on people who are doing things like MP3s. They don't want to risk it coming out that they did something like that. They would only use it if they thought something was going on that would threaten national security, like terrorists in the US using PCs as communication.

    --
    Today is the closing of a parenthesis opened before this sig, before this story, before this existence that is me (as if
    1. Re:Even if it's true, who cares? by dattaway · · Score: 1

      No, they will not likely conduct raids upon poor working class families. That's not the goal. Its when the warez are brought into places of employment that the software audits, or raids, are profitable in scoring new sales through "license settlements."

      Play with warez at home and no one is going to complain.

      Do it at work and you put the employer in a position of serious liability. $250,000 and 20 years in jail for each offense is a lot of negotiating power for agreeing to an all Microsoft solution. What a bargain.

  30. The French are getting paranoid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, they woudn't allow encryption. Afraid of thier own people. Then they accuse the US for pushing key escrow for spying purposes. Then they accuse US/UK of using intercepted comms for industrial advantage. Now THIS! haha :)

    Next they will mandate everyone use Linux and openSSL on all computers. WooHoo!

  31. Blocked! by Serf · · Score: 4

    The page is blocked by the Chinese government.
    (Yes, it actually is. I had to use a proxy in the States.)

    Whacked-out theories, anyone?

    1. Re:Blocked! by Weezul · · Score: 2

      This is an interesting post. If the Chinese government wants to block someone then maybe we should work extra hard to make shure Chinese people see it. Are there any blocked site news letters so Chinese people can know what to go find on the internet?

      I think we need to se up a sindicated blocked site list which sites like slashdot can included in baxes. It would list sites blocked by censorware, governements, etc. and have information for getting arrouind the block so people could get to these sites easily. Ultimatly, it would make blocking a site have the opposite effect.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    2. Re:Blocked! by Hellmongr · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be an ass or anything but wouldn't they just block sites like Slashdot, etc if they started doing this?

    3. Re:Blocked! by Weezul · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be an ass or anything but wouldn't they just block sites like Slashdot, etc if they started doing this?

      First, the idea was that LOTS of sites would carry the blocked site of the day list, i.e. they can't block them all. Actually, you would distribute a script to create a daily graphic so that people without script access could host it. The problem is that the graphic would be blocked too, so you would need lots of people to mirror it (or use the script to generate the daily graphic) and a database of unblocked URL for the graphic. It would be impossible to impossible to block the graphic on every URL in the database since you would make it easy to obtain a few URLs from the database but very difficult to obtain a large percentage of the database.

      Second, you could say that it is more importent for these people to have access to news sources like slashdot then to protest, but I do not really think that is a major concern. Having access to a list of blocked sites and ways to get arround the blocking implies learning about and having access to the blocked sites.

      We are discussing this at kuro5hin.org.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  32. NSA == US Only; CIA == global by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    They should have at least accused the proper agency. The CIA is the agency that has a world-wide reach. NSA is concerned with internal matters ONLY.

    1. Re:NSA == US Only; CIA == global by criticalrealist · · Score: 1
      This is plainly wrong. The NSA is mainly concerned with eavesdropping on the communications of anyone/any government that might antagonize the US. They are also concerned with securing the communications of the US government to prevent eavesdropping by others.

      Additionally, the NSA's mission statement (on nsa.gov) plainly indicates NSA's supportive role for the USA's "warfighters," or American soldiers in various theatres and conflicts throughout the world.

      If the NSA runs anything like Echelon, then they further would have both external and internal roles.

      --
      I am not a lawyer.
    2. Re:NSA == US Only; CIA == global by B.+Samedi · · Score: 2

      Not true. The NSA and CIA are not allowed to spy on internal matters. This was backed up by Congress in either the late 50's or 60's (I'm foggy right know on which).

      That was one of the big deals about them spying on email. They aren't supposed to do that to Americans and some American mail might have gone through foriegn servers and hence been seen. The FBI generally handles the internal matters that would be handled by the NSA if they could work inside US borders.


    3. Re:NSA == US Only; CIA == global by Hollinger · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. 'scue me while I go stand in the corner.

      Mike Hollinger

    4. Re:NSA == US Only; CIA == global by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is completely false. NSA only has concerns with foreign matters, it is illegal for NSA to spy on US citizens. You are thinking about the FBI.

  33. Re:French Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound Russian to me. Oh well.

  34. Can't believe M$ would spy on Windows users. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    I can't believe M$ would spy on Windows users.

    It would be more likely that Microsoft would spy on OS/2 and Linux users.

    1. Re:Can't believe M$ would spy on Windows users. by dattaway · · Score: 2

      I can't believe M$ would spy on Windows users.

      Beleive it.

    2. Re:Can't believe M$ would spy on Windows users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet your hands are sore--from slapping your forehead.

  35. Re:Fun Times - Get Crackin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (C)1999 by Me. Not allowed to be read by others.

    Select menu option: system

    Menu options: -------------------------------------------------- ----------------
    display - Display the system configuration
    snapshot - Display all configuration and status information
    ip - Administer IP for system interface
    softwareUpdate - Load a new revision of system software
    baseline - Administer a statistics baseline
    serialPort - Administer the terminal and modem serial ports
    consoleTimeout - Administer console inactivity timeout
    password - Set the console passwords
    name - Set the system name
    time - Set the date and time
    screenHeight - Set the console screen height
    ctlKeys - Enable/Disable Ctl-X (reboot) and Ctl-C (abort)
    nvData - Save, restore, or reset nonvolatile data
    clearDiagBlock - Clear the diagnostic block
    reboot - Reboot the system
    upTime - Display the system up time

    Type "q" to return to the previous menu or ? for help.
    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------
    Select menu option (system): display
    CoreBuilder 3500 (rev 0.0) - System ID 454f8f
    Dual power supply
    Base Corebuilder 3500 Software
    Version 1.0.0 - Built 11/19/97 04:12:04 PM

    Time in Service: 543 Days
    System Name: CoreBuilder-454F8F

    Revision Diagnostics Serial 3C Number
    Processor board AB Passed 2JAJ003036 3C35004
    Backplane/Motherboard 02 Passed 2JBD001393 3C35001
    Slot
    1 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet AA Failed 2JQJ001525 3C35220
    2 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet AA Passed 2JQJ001736 3C35220
    4 10/100 BASE TX Ethernet AD Failed 2JCJ005628 3C35210

    Diagnostic Failures:
    - Revision -
    Count Code Last Failure POV Extend
    Slot
    1 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet 6 100-0b 1999-OCT-25 7:37.26 01.24 01.22
    4 10/100 BASE TX Ethernet 3 100-01 1999-OCT-25 7:37.30 01.24 01.22

    AP Memory Size : 16 Mb
    FP Memory Size : 4 Mb
    Flash Memory Size : 8 Mb
    Buffer Memory Size : 3 Mb

    Menu options: -------------------------------------------------- ----------------
    display - Display the system configuration
    snapshot - Display all configuration and status information
    ip - Administer IP for system interface
    softwareUpdate - Load a new revision of system software
    baseline - Administer a statistics baseline
    serialPort - Administer the terminal and modem serial ports
    consoleTimeout - Administer console inactivity timeout
    password - Set the console passwords
    name - Set the system name
    time - Set the date and time
    screenHeight - Set the console screen height
    ctlKeys - Enable/Disable Ctl-X (reboot) and Ctl-C (abort)
    nvData - Save, restore, or reset nonvolatile data
    clearDiagBlock - Clear the diagnostic block
    reboot - Reboot the system
    upTime - Display the system up time

    Type "q" to return to the previous menu or ? for help.
    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------
    Select menu option (system): snapshot

    Menu options: -------------------------------------------------- ----------------
    summary - Show all summary screens
    detail - Show all detailed screens
    save - Save all detailed screens to a file

    Type "q" to return to the previous menu or ? for help.
    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------
    Select menu option (system/snapshot):

    Menu options: -------------------------------------------------- ----------------
    summary - Show all summary screens
    detail - Show all detailed screens
    save - Save all detailed screens to a file

    Type "q" to return to the previous menu or ? for help.
    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------
    Select menu option (system/snapshot):

    Menu options: -------------------------------------------------- ----------------
    summary - Show all summary screens
    detail - Show all detailed screens
    save - Save all detailed screens to a file

    Type "q" to return to the previous menu or ? for help.
    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------
    Select menu option (system/snapshot): summary
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/display
    CoreBuilder 3500 (rev 0.0) - System ID 454f8f
    Dual power supply
    Base Corebuilder 3500 Software
    Version 1.0.0 - Built 11/19/97 04:12:04 PM

    Time in Service: 543 Days
    System Name: CoreBuilder-454F8F

    Revision Diagnostics Serial 3C Number
    Processor board AB Passed 2JAJ003036 3C35004
    Backplane/Motherboard 02 Passed 2JBD001393 3C35001
    Slot
    1 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet AA Failed 2JQJ001525 3C35220
    2 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet AA Passed 2JQJ001736 3C35220
    4 10/100 BASE TX Ethernet AD Failed 2JCJ005628 3C35210

    Diagnostic Failures:
    - Revision -
    Count Code Last Failure POV Extend
    Slot
    1 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet 6 100-0b 1999-OCT-25 7:37.26 01.24 01.22
    4 10/100 BASE TX Ethernet 3 100-01 1999-OCT-25 7:37.30 01.24 01.22

    AP Memory Size : 16 Mb
    FP Memory Size : 4 Mb
    Flash Memory Size : 8 Mb
    Buffer Memory Size : 3 Mb
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/ip/interface/summary

    No IP interfaces are defined.
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/ip/route/display

    No routes are defined.
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/ip/arp/display

    The ARP cache is empty.
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/ip/ping/display

    count = 3 (Number of ICMP request packets to be sent)
    wait = 1 (Number of seconds to wait between each packet)
    packetSize = 64 (Number of bytes to be sent in each packet)
    quiet = disabled (Display output in Verbose mode)
    burst = disabled
    source addr = N/A (Router will pick the best interface)
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/ip/traceRoute/display

    Current traceroute options values:

    ttl = 30 (Maximum number of hops used in outpoing probes)
    port = 33434 (Base UDP port number used in probes)
    probe = 3 (Number of probes to be sent at each ttl level)
    wait = 3 (Time--in seconds--to wait for a response)
    packetSize = 28 (Number of bytes to be sent in each UDP packet)
    numeric = disabled (Addresses are displayed symbolically and numerically)
    source addr = N/A (Router will pick the best interface)
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/baseline/display

    A baseline has not yet been set.

    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: system/upTime
    System up time: 25 Days 2 Hours 20 Minutes 29 Seconds
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ethernet/summary

    port portLabel portType
    1 10BaseT(RJ45)
    2 HS-DRAFTING 100BaseFx
    3 HS-E-WING-ELECTRICAL-ROOM 100BaseFx
    4 HS-SECOND-FLOOR 100BaseFx
    5 HS-B114 100BaseFx
    6 ORCHARD-HILL-WAN-LINK 100BaseFx
    7 MIDDLE-SCHOOL-WAN-LINK 100BaseFx
    8 BOARD-OFFICE 100BaseFx
    9 100BaseFx
    10 100BaseFx
    11 100BaseFx
    12 100BaseFx
    13 HS-MDF 100BaseFx
    14 10/100BaseT(RJ45)
    15 10/100BaseT(RJ45)
    16 10/100BaseT(RJ45)
    17 10/100BaseT(RJ45)
    18 10/100BaseT(RJ45)
    19 10/100BaseT(RJ45)

    port portState linkStatus autoNegMode
    1 on-line disabled n/a
    2 on-line enabled disable
    3 on-line enabled disable
    4 on-line enabled disable
    5 on-line enabled disable
    6 on-line enabled disable
    7 on-line enabled disable
    8 on-line enabled disable
    9 on-line enabled disable
    10 off-line disabled disable
    11 off-line disabled disable
    12 off-line disabled disable
    13 off-line disabled disable
    14 on-line enabled enable
    15 off-line disabled enable
    16 off-line disabled enable
    17 off-line disabled enable
    18 off-line disabled enable
    19 off-line disabled enable

    port autoNegState reqPortMode actualPortMode
    1 n/a n/a 10half
    2 disabled 100half 100half
    3 disabled 100half 100half
    4 disabled 100half 100half
    5 disabled 100half 100half
    6 disabled 100half 100half
    7 disabled 100half 100half
    8 disabled 100half 100half
    9 disabled 100half 100half
    10 disabled 100half 100half
    11 disabled 100half 100half
    12 disabled 100half 100half
    13 disabled 100half 100half
    14 completed 10half 100full
    15 configuring 10half n/a
    16 configuring 10half n/a
    17 configuring 10half n/a
    18 configuring 10half n/a
    19 configuring 10half n/a

    port rxFrames txFrames rxBytes
    1 0 0 0
    2 589581 4920175 73121701
    3 994138 5211320 212691508
    4 9718160 17235668 639719721
    5 8646763 9149306 1629747861
    6 10145611 8069942 2905038420
    7 7214887 11499498 860669579
    8 1232753 5554812 353968072
    9 39514 501783 4901821
    10 0 0 0
    11 0 0 0
    12 0 0 0
    13 0 0 0
    14 24652052 24539182 484297677
    15 0 0 0
    16 0 0 0
    17 0 0 0
    18 0 0 0
    19 0 0 0

    port txBytes rxErrs txErrs
    1 0 0 0
    2 831866126 0 0
    3 895632963 0 0
    4 620755197 0 0
    5 295188509 0 0
    6 2458601991 834 0
    7 1398831941 356 0
    8 1224329469 77 0
    9 46134175 31 0
    10 0 0 0
    11 0 0 0
    12 0 0 0
    13 0 0 0
    14 1447578273 0 0
    15 0 0 0
    16 0 0 0
    17 0 0 0
    18 0 0 0
    19 0 0 0

    port noRxBuffers txQOverflows macAddress
    1 n/a n/a 00-80-3e-45-4f-8f
    2 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-90
    3 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-91
    4 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-92
    5 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-93
    6 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-94
    7 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-95
    8 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-96
    9 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-97
    10 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-98
    11 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-99
    12 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-9a
    13 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-9b
    14 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-a2
    15 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-a3
    16 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-a4
    17 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-a5
    18 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-a6
    19 0 0 00-80-3e-45-4f-a7
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: bridge/display

    stpState timeSinceLastTopologyChange
    disabled 0 hrs 0 mins 0 secs

    topologyChangeCount
    0

    topologyChangeFlag BridgeIdentifier
    false 8000 00803e454f90

    designatedRoot stpGroupAddress bridgeMaxAge
    0000 000000000000 01-80-c2-00-00-00 20

    maxAge bridgeHelloTime helloTime
    20 2 2

    bridgeFwdDelay forwardDelay holdTime
    15 15 1

    rootCost rootPort priority
    0 No port 0x8000

    agingTime mode addrTableSize
    300 transparent 32768

    addressCount peakAddrCount addrThreshold
    137 297 29491

    ipFragmentation ipxTranslation lowLatency
    enabled disabled n/a

    trFddiMode SRBridgeNumber bufferLimit
    n/a n/a n/a
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: bridge/port/summary

    port rxFrames rxDiscards txFrames
    Fast Ethernet 1 588502 374 4841397
    Fast Ethernet 2 984522 45273 5112622
    Fast Ethernet 3 8174364 89236 13783455
    Fast Ethernet 4 8621793 261625 9040917
    Fast Ethernet 5 4732180 2 3964890
    Fast Ethernet 6 260869 0 3126716
    Fast Ethernet 7 1220725 23715 5466592
    Fast Ethernet 8 12565 0 467301
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 14214172 28027 15771452
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 0 0

    port portId fwdTransitions
    Fast Ethernet 1 0x8001 0
    Fast Ethernet 2 0x8002 0
    Fast Ethernet 3 0x8003 0
    Fast Ethernet 4 0x8004 0
    Fast Ethernet 5 0x8005 0
    Fast Ethernet 6 0x8006 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 0x8007 0
    Fast Ethernet 8 0x8008 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0x8009 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0x800a 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0x800b 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0x800c 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 0x800d 0
    Fast Ethernet 14 0x800e 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0x800f 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0x8010 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0x8011 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0x8012 0

    port stp linkState state
    Fast Ethernet 1 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 2 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 3 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 4 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 5 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 6 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 7 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 8 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 9 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 10 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 11 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 12 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 13 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 14 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 15 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 16 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 17 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 18 enabled down forwarding
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: bridge/vlan/summary

    VLAN summary

    Ports 1-18=Fast Ethernet

    Index VID Name Ports
    1 1 IP_VLAN 1-4, 7, 9-18
    2 2 HS-MS-WAN 6
    3 3 HS-ES-WAN 5
    4 4 Mac 1-18
    5 5 HS-VS-WAN 8
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ip/interface/summary

    IP routing is enabled, RIP is active, Poisoned Reverse is enabled,
    ICMP router discovery is disabled

    Index Type IP address Subnet mask Cost State VLAN index
    1 VLAN 10.10.1.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 1
    2 VLAN 10.50.0.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 2
    3 VLAN 10.60.0.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 3
    4 VLAN 10.70.0.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 5

    Index Number Advertisement Address(es)
    1 1 10.10.255.255
    2 1 10.50.255.255
    3 1 10.60.255.255
    4 1 10.70.255.255
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ip/route/display

    IP routing is enabled, RIP is active, Poisoned Reverse is enabled,
    ICMP router discovery is disabled

    Destination Subnet mask Metric Gateway Status
    Default Route -- -- 10.10.1.4 Static
    10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 -- 10.50.0.2 Static
    10.30.0.0 255.255.0.0 -- 10.60.0.2 Static
    10.40.0.0 255.255.0.0 2 10.70.0.2 Learned (RIP)
    10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    10.60.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    10.70.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ip/arp/display

    IP routing is enabled, RIP is active, Poisoned Reverse is enabled,
    ICMP router discovery is disabled

    There are 84 ARP cache entries

    IP address Type I/F Hardware address
    10.10.0.1 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-20-24-fb
    10.10.2.0 static 1 08-00-4e-37-44-28
    10.10.3.0 static 1 08-00-4e-37-3f-67
    10.10.4.0 static 1 08-00-4e-37-3e-d8
    10.10.1.4 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-06-7b-ea
    10.10.0.5 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-bf-2f
    10.10.5.0 static 1 08-00-4e-37-3f-73
    10.10.6.0 static 1 08-00-4e-37-3e-91
    10.10.7.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-45-09
    10.10.8.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-35-d8
    10.10.9.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-45-2f
    10.10.1.9 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-fd-1c
    10.10.10.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-35-ba
    10.10.11.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-36-e6
    10.10.12.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-43-0c
    10.10.13.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-47-4e
    10.10.14.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-47-5c
    10.10.15.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-47-90
    10.10.16.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-46-dc
    10.10.17.0 static 1 08-00-4e-36-35-fa
    10.10.18.0 static 1 00-90-04-12-26-f8
    10.10.19.0 static 1 00-90-04-bf-b7-98
    10.10.20.0 static 1 00-90-04-bf-c3-58
    10.10.21.0 static 1 00-90-04-bc-bf-98
    10.10.22.0 static 1 00-90-04-bf-c5-18
    10.10.23.0 static 1 00-90-04-bf-bd-18
    10.10.24.0 static 1 00-90-04-bf-f0-58
    10.10.25.0 static 1 00-90-04-bf-83-18
    10.10.1.31 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-fd-44
    10.10.1.34 dynamic 1 00-50-04-7b-6a-af
    10.10.1.40 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-98-ee-60
    10.50.0.2 dynamic 2 00-80-3e-45-c5-a1
    10.10.1.43 dynamic 1 00-10-4b-f6-d2-66
    10.10.1.45 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-83-20
    10.10.1.48 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-9a-4c-05
    10.10.1.49 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6d-7a
    10.10.1.50 dynamic 1 00-50-04-a7-2f-b8
    10.60.0.2 dynamic 3 00-80-3e-45-f7-a7
    10.10.1.52 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-83-34
    10.10.1.55 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6c-54
    10.10.1.57 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-e3-6f
    10.10.1.58 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-99-25-ca
    10.70.0.2 dynamic 4 00-80-3e-6b-50-e4
    10.10.1.63 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-c2-6b
    10.10.1.64 dynamic 1 00-50-04

  36. NSA == global by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA is in charge of all the spy satellites overhead, which are not just pointed down at the United States.

    1. Re:NSA == global by Dr.+Weasel · · Score: 1

      I thought the NRO handled the spy sats?

    2. Re:NSA == global by Detritus · · Score: 2

      I think the NRO handles the visible light and radar reconnaissance satellites and the NSA handles the SIGINT/COMINT eavesdropping satellites.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  37. Re:Fun Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -9e-bd-94
    10.10.1.73 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-fd-b8
    10.10.1.78 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-03-fc
    10.10.2.78 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6c-8b
    10.10.1.79 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-98-ea-66
    10.10.1.88 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-bd-7f
    10.10.2.94 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-c2-5c
    10.10.1.95 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6c-76
    10.10.1.100 dynamic 1 00-90-27-73-5c-8f
    10.10.2.100 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-bf-2e
    10.10.1.110 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-99-28-1b
    10.10.1.114 dynamic 1 00-50-04-7b-69-30
    10.10.1.116 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-63-e4
    10.10.1.119 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-66-c0
    10.10.1.120 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-99-28-ee
    10.10.1.122 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-c1-29
    10.10.1.128 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6c-71
    10.10.1.137 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-bd-9c
    10.10.1.141 dynamic 1 00-20-af-d5-5d-7b
    10.10.1.203 dynamic 1 00-a0-24-74-f9-47
    10.10.1.209 dynamic 1 00-c0-4f-81-4f-35
    10.10.1.210 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-83-60
    10.10.1.211 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-fd-60
    10.10.1.226 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-83-e4
    10.10.2.230 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-c2-5b
    10.10.2.231 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-be-06
    10.10.1.233 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-9a-6d-0d
    10.10.2.233 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6d-ac
    10.10.3.233 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6c-72
    10.10.1.236 dynamic 1 00-c0-4f-81-39-97
    10.10.2.237 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-be-61
    10.10.2.239 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-c2-63
    10.10.2.240 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-63-b4
    10.10.4.241 dynamic 1 00-10-5a-01-6c-58
    10.10.2.244 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-bd-8b
    10.10.3.244 dynamic 1 00-05-02-d6-2f-5d
    10.10.3.247 dynamic 1 00-50-04-9e-be-02
    10.10.4.252 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-fd-c4
    10.10.4.253 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-fd-58
    10.10.4.254 dynamic 1 00-80-5f-ea-fd-e0
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ip/dns/display

    No Domain Name is defined
    No Name Server IP addresses are defined
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ip/udpHelper/display

    BOOTP relay hop count limit is 4, BOOTP relay threshold is 10.

    UDP port Forwarding address
    67 10.10.255.255
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ip/ping/display

    count = 3 (Number of ICMP request packets to be sent)
    wait = 1 (Number of seconds to wait between each packet)
    packetSize = 64 (Number of bytes to be sent in each packet)
    quiet = disabled (Display output in Verbose mode)
    burst = disabled
    source addr = N/A (Router will pick the best interface)
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: ip/traceRoute/display

    Current traceroute options values:

    ttl = 30 (Maximum number of hops used in outpoing probes)
    port = 33434 (Base UDP port number used in probes)
    probe = 3 (Number of probes to be sent at each ttl level)
    wait = 3 (Time--in seconds--to wait for a response)
    packetSize = 28 (Number of bytes to be sent in each UDP packet)
    numeric = disabled (Addresses are displayed symbolically and numerically)
    source addr = N/A (Router will pick the best interface)
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: snmp/display
    Read-only community is public
    Read-write community is private
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen: snmp/trap/display
    No trap destination info configured

    Menu options: -------------------------------------------------- ----------------
    summary - Show all summary screens
    detail - Show all detailed screens
    save - Save all detailed screens to a file

    Type "q" to return to the previous menu or ? for help.
    ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------
    Select menu option (system/snapshot): detail
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/display
    CoreBuilder 3500 (rev 0.0) - System ID 454f8f
    Dual power supply
    Base Corebuilder 3500 Software
    Version 1.0.0 - Built 11/19/97 04:12:04 PM

    Time in Service: 543 Days
    System Name: CoreBuilder-454F8F

    Revision Diagnostics Serial 3C Number
    Processor board AB Passed 2JAJ003036 3C35004
    Backplane/Motherboard 02 Passed 2JBD001393 3C35001
    Slot
    1 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet AA Failed 2JQJ001525 3C35220
    2 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet AA Passed 2JQJ001736 3C35220
    4 10/100 BASE TX Ethernet AD Failed 2JCJ005628 3C35210

    Diagnostic Failures:
    - Revision -
    Count Code Last Failure POV Extend
    Slot
    1 10/100 BASE FX Ethernet 6 100-0b 1999-OCT-25 7:37.26 01.24 01.22
    4 10/100 BASE TX Ethernet 3 100-01 1999-OCT-25 7:37.30 01.24 01.22

    AP Memory Size : 16 Mb
    FP Memory Size : 4 Mb
    Flash Memory Size : 8 Mb
    Buffer Memory Size : 3 Mb
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/ip/interface/summary

    No IP interfaces are defined.
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/ip/route/display

    No routes are defined.
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/ip/arp/display

    The ARP cache is empty.
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/ip/ping/display

    count = 3 (Number of ICMP request packets to be sent)
    wait = 1 (Number of seconds to wait between each packet)
    packetSize = 64 (Number of bytes to be sent in each packet)
    quiet = disabled (Display output in Verbose mode)
    burst = disabled
    source addr = N/A (Router will pick the best interface)
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/ip/traceRoute/display

    Current traceroute options values:

    ttl = 30 (Maximum number of hops used in outpoing probes)
    port = 33434 (Base UDP port number used in probes)
    probe = 3 (Number of probes to be sent at each ttl level)
    wait = 3 (Time--in seconds--to wait for a response)
    packetSize = 28 (Number of bytes to be sent in each UDP packet)
    numeric = disabled (Addresses are displayed symbolically and numerically)
    source addr = N/A (Router will pick the best interface)
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/baseline/display

    A baseline has not yet been set.

    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen system/upTime
    System up time: 25 Days 2 Hours 20 Minutes 58 Seconds
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen ethernet/detail

    port rxFrames rxBytes rxFrameRate
    1 0 0 n/a
    2 589581 73121701 0
    3 994173 212694616 0
    4 9718241 639729774 9
    5 8647722 1629881709 73
    6 10147643 2906054248 65
    7 7216162 860776291 24
    8 1232761 353968602 0
    9 39515 4901951 0
    10 0 0 0
    11 0 0 0
    12 0 0 0
    13 0 0 0
    14 24654021 485308785 125
    15 0 0 0
    16 0 0 0
    17 0 0 0
    18 0 0 0
    19 0 0 0

    port rxByteRate rxPeakFrameRate rxPeakByteRate
    1 n/a n/a n/a
    2 0 365 112257
    3 1235 451 648364
    4 3912 1218 1788508
    5 8799 673 956144
    6 2431 1488 1151842
    7 5059 820 1122188
    8 0 814 1157442
    9 0 308 21956
    10 0 0 0
    11 0 0 0
    12 0 0 0
    13 0 0 0
    14 45173 907 765305
    15 0 0 0
    16 0 0 0
    17 0 0 0
    18 0 0 0
    19 0 0 0

    port noRxBuffers alignmentErrs fcsErrs
    1 n/a 0 0
    2 0 0 0
    3 0 0 0
    4 0 0 0
    5 0 0 0
    6 0 404 431
    7 0 166 190
    8 0 30 47
    9 0 18 13
    10 0 0 0
    11 0 0 0
    12 0 0 0
    13 16 10half n/a
    17 10half n/a
    18 10half n/a
    19 10half n/a
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen bridge/display

    stpState timeSinceLastTopologyChange
    disabled 0 hrs 0 mins 0 secs

    topologyChangeCount
    0

    topologyChangeFlag BridgeIdentifier
    false 8000 00803e454f90

    designatedRoot stpGroupAddress bridgeMaxAge
    0000 000000000000 01-80-c2-00-00-00 20

    maxAge bridgeHelloTime helloTime
    20 2 2

    bridgeFwdDelay forwardDelay holdTime
    15 15 1

    rootCost rootPort priority
    0 No port 0x8000

    agingTime mode addrTableSize
    300 transparent 32768

    addressCount peakAddrCount addrThreshold
    138 297 29491

    ipFragmentation ipxTranslation lowLatency
    enabled disabled n/a

    trFddiMode SRBridgeNumber bufferLimit
    n/a n/a n/a
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen bridge/port/detail

    port rxFrames rxNoDestDiscs rxSameSegDiscs
    Fast Ethernet 1 588502 52 322
    Fast Ethernet 2 984574 45265 9
    Fast Ethernet 3 8174493 88298 940
    Fast Ethernet 4 8623371 261195 435
    Fast Ethernet 5 4735305 0 2
    Fast Ethernet 6 262183 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 1220741 23653 62
    Fast Ethernet 8 12566 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 14215981 27259 768
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 0 0

    port rxErrorDiscs rxMcastLimit rxMcastExcDiscs
    Fast Ethernet 1 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 2 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 3 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 4 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 5 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 6 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 8 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 0 0

    port rxMcastExceeds rxSecurityDiscs rxOtherDiscs
    Fast Ethernet 1 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 2 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 3 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 4 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 5 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 6 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 8 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 0 0

    port rxAllFilters rxMcastFilters rxForwardUcasts
    Fast Ethernet 1 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 2 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 3 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 4 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 5 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 6 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 7 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 8 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 13 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 0 n/a
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 0 n/a

    port rxFloodUcasts rxForwardMcasts txBlockedDiscs
    Fast Ethernet 1 1 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 2 14 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 3 537 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 4 566 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 5 3 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 6 1 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 23 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 8 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 77 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 n/a 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 n/a 0

    port txMtuExcDiscs txAllFilters txMcastFilters
    Fast Ethernet 1 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 2 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 3 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 4 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 5 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 6 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 8 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 0 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 0 0

    port txFrames portId fwdTransitions
    Fast Ethernet 1 4841555 0x8001 0
    Fast Ethernet 2 5112836 0x8002 0
    Fast Ethernet 3 13783833 0x8003 0
    Fast Ethernet 4 9042912 0x8004 0
    Fast Ethernet 5 3966461 0x8005 0
    Fast Ethernet 6 3130763 0x8006 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 5466773 0x8007 0
    Fast Ethernet 8 467345 0x8008 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0 0x8009 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0 0x800a 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0 0x800b 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0 0x800c 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 15773299 0x800d 0
    Fast Ethernet 14 0 0x800e 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0 0x800f 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0 0x8010 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0 0x8011 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0 0x8012 0

    port stp linkState state
    Fast Ethernet 1 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 2 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 3 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 4 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 5 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 6 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 7 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 8 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 9 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 10 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 11 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 12 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 13 enabled up forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 14 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 15 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 16 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 17 enabled down forwarding
    Fast Ethernet 18 enabled down forwarding

    port priority pathCost designatedCost
    Fast Ethernet 1 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 2 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 3 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 4 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 5 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 6 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 7 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 8 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 9 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 10 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 11 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 12 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 13 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 14 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 15 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 16 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 17 0x80 10 0
    Fast Ethernet 18 0x80 10 0

    port designatedPort designatedRoot designatedBridge
    Fast Ethernet 1 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 2 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 3 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 4 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 5 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 6 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 7 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 8 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 9 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 10 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 11 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 12 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 13 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 14 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 15 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 16 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 17 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    Fast Ethernet 18 0x0 0000 000000000000 0000 000000000000
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

  38. Re:Fun Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most sys admins running NT don't know much anyway, ...

    I prefer to call NT users push button operators, because all they know about networking is pushing buttons and calling people about what secret registry entry they need. Damn funny people to watch trying to figger anything out. They are the most drinkinest guys on the weekend though.

  39. Re:Fun Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screen bridge/vlan/detail

    VLAN detail

    Ports 1-18=Fast Ethernet

    Index VID Name Ports
    1 1 IP_VLAN 1-4, 7, 9-18
    2 2 HS-MS-WAN 6
    3 3 HS-ES-WAN 5
    4 4 Mac 1-18
    5 5 HS-VS-WAN 8

    Index Protocol
    1 IP
    2 IP
    3 IP
    4 Apple
    5 IP

    Index Layer 3 address
    1 none
    2 none
    3 none
    4 none
    5 none

    Index rxUcastFrames rxUcastBytes txUcastFrames txUcastBytes
    1 41979812 3006586856 44826477 3357243813
    2 7101893 853307126 8563118 1161076692
    3 9358387 2857073824 5726111 2255996296
    4 5792070 2333841488 5852394 2337598637
    5 26914 3542715 34490 7625572

    Index rxMcastFrames rxMcastBytes txMcastFrames txMcastBytes
    1 2255077 197231105 16054066 1293680681
    2 100108 6501800 2942611 241301665
    3 716764 46058565 2346375 203043287
    4 3042873 247816021 21766521 1773150278
    5 2021 129344 467349 38512255

    Index rxBcastFrames rxBcastBytes txBcastFrames txBcastBytes
    1 1143378 133023176 5716885 665115432
    2 8388 1090374 0 0
    3 72499 5067274 0 0
    4 261360 16728132 1289749 82549396
    5 10546 1230022 0 0
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen ip/interface/summary

    IP routing is enabled, RIP is active, Poisoned Reverse is enabled,
    ICMP router discovery is disabled

    Index Type IP address Subnet mask Cost State VLAN index
    1 VLAN 10.10.1.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 1
    2 VLAN 10.50.0.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 2
    3 VLAN 10.60.0.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 3
    4 VLAN 10.70.0.1 255.255.0.0 1 Up 5

    Index Number Advertisement Address(es)
    1 1 10.10.255.255
    2 1 10.50.255.255
    3 1 10.60.255.255
    4 1 10.70.255.255
    ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------

    Screen ip/route/display

    IP routing is enabled, RIP is active, Poisoned Reverse is enabled,
    ICMP router discovery is disabled

    Destination Subnet mask Metric Gateway Status
    Default Route -- -- 10.10.1.4 Static
    10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 -- 10.50.0.2 Static
    10.30.0.0 255.255.0.0 -- 10.60.0.2 Static
    10.40.0.0 255.255.0.0 2 10.70.0.2 Learned (RIP)
    10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    10.60.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    10.70.0.0 255.255.0.0 1 -- Direct
    -------------------------------------

  40. Waste of bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This message is a waste of bandwidth! Anyone who believes this crap is a moron.

    1. Re:Waste of bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This message is a waste of bandwidth! Anyone who believes this crap is a moron.

      I thought the same about all the bloat in Microsoft Word. Boy, was I wrong! What waited in that heap of feature ridden code was traps for viruses and word basic trojans. I know the purpose of your pointless post was to insert some secret code, such as DeCSS snippets hidden under the html tags. I know what you're up too. Don't lie to me.

    2. Re:Waste of bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This message is a waste of bandwidth! Anyone who believes this crap is a moron.

      I presume, dear A. Coward, that you're post is self-referential?

  41. Re:Fun Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOOTP relay hop count limit is 4, BOOTP relay threshold is 10. UDP port Forwarding address 67 10.10.255.255

  42. Will Microsoft Respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    It will be interesting to see how Microsoft responds to this. On the face of it, it appears too outrageous to even need a comment.

    But their PR department has been so inept lately, that they will probably issue such an incompetent denial that all the conspiracy buffs will be convinced that it is true, all true! For example, look at Microsoft's DOJ testimony, look at the 63000 bugs memo, look at Mr. Bill's open sourcing Windows interview (Oh, no, he didn't really mean what he meant!)

    What "innovative" way will Microsoft find to fumble the ball this time?

    But it probably won't matter anyway, because Microsoft has cleverly marketed their products to morons who actually seem to find Microsoft's bumbling comforting, or at least non-threatening.

  43. uh, no by criticalrealist · · Score: 1

    You seem to imply that this is some kind of "Weekly World News" publication. It doesn't appear to be. A tabloid, yes. They simply quote from a "French report." They probably haven't done much fact checking themselves on it. But The Age appears to be at least somewhat useful as an information source.

    --
    I am not a lawyer.
  44. All this nsa "Stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We really need to have No Such Administration (pun heavily intended) I am a windows user, but if this is what MS wants to shovel us-- Ive tried linux and I can learn! The french arent as dumb as many of us think-- they did pull off the french revolution, mabye they will pull off the "American Revolution" and overthrow America's soverign rule over the planet. Well, im going off to shiver in a corner. Good day to you

  45. Microsoft C2 certification by noeld · · Score: 1
    It is my understanding that Microsoft certified a non-network connected NT machine C2 certified and then sold whatever version and configuration the customer wanted, while saying:

    "sure NT is C2 certified"

    Seems like this ties into the helping out the spies therory. Sell something that is as open as a baby and then tell everyone it is solid as a rock. Could make it much easier to spy.

    Noel

    RootPrompt.org -- Nothing but Unix

  46. no, it matters by criticalrealist · · Score: 1

    If this story is actually true (ha ha ha), then it does matter. My freedom and privacy cannot be bought and sold like the shares of Red Hat and VAndover. These are priceless things. I want to know if they've been violated.

    --
    I am not a lawyer.
  47. French spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    french spies have been observing me pouring hot bowls of grits down my pants. ooh la la. thank you.

    1. Re:French spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      french spies have been observing me pouring hot bowls of grits down my pants. ooh la la. thank you.

      Are those hot grits down your pants, or is that a hidden nsa camera? I'm happy to see you too, but I have no unlicensed grits in my pants to be busted with.

  48. Why don't you believe it's true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone else in the world hates the united states, why don't you start?

  49. Business is good in the PR world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PR agencies are working serious overtime. No sleep this weekend, because of posts like this on slashdot.

  50. umm. yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and there's a monster living inside the pentagon...

  51. Linux funded by Communists by Yebyen · · Score: 3
    Linux Funded by China, Helps Lessen American Influence and spread Communism

    Someone had to say it, but here are some reasons to support my theory :-)
    • Freely distributable... "Spread it around"
    • Official OS of China (don't remember if this turned out to be false...)
    • Most of the licensing seems to ask developers to make programs because you need them and distribute them for the good of the community
    Hehe...

    --
    linuxisgood:~$ man woman
    --
    Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
  52. Serious Doubts by SloWave · · Score: 1


    Come on now. Do you think a US Government Agency
    spending billions of tax dollars could really make Windows so easy to break into, spy-on, crash on demand? It takes real evil genius to do all this and then mind control thousands of clueless marketroids into actually buying Windows.

  53. Eh? by starlingX · · Score: 1

    So this is why the Justice Department is trying to break them up now?

    I don't think so. If they had all these little buggers hidden within the code on each windows box, I think that the Justice Department would have "dropped the case" by now.

    1. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the Justice Department and the NSA don't work together. In fact, the attorney general acts as a check against the NSA by being the only one who can authorise the NSA to spy domestically (which they're not suppose to do). Furthermore, the DOJ has been investigating the NSA over the Echelon issue.

      The idea that, because one part of the government wants something one way, another part of the government is going to agree with them and facilitate it is overly simplistic in this analysis.

  54. More anti-Microsoft propaganda . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I personally don't believe this is true, but it's an interesting enough rumor to post for discussion.



    In other words, Windows 2000 is killing Linux now, so Slashdot has to post whatever it can find that makes Microsoft look bad.

    1. Re:More anti-Microsoft propaganda . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because Micrsoft is a big company that makes buggy software doesn't mean it needs any help looking worse. The backdoors in Windows has brought these issues up before. Don't be naive.

    2. Re:More anti-Microsoft propaganda . . . by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

      Yeap? Could be. But there's is no need to show Microsoft looking bad. It is BAD by itself. Or you have never seen small packs running out of your computer, without your clear knowledge, into some location in the Net? That happens with some Windows soft... (And why they need this damn GID anyway? :) )

    3. Re:More anti-Microsoft propaganda . . . by randombit · · Score: 2

      In other words, Windows 2000 is killing Linux now, so Slashdot has to post whatever it can find that makes Microsoft look bad.

      WTF? You've been able to buy it for, what, 2 whole days now (release date was 2/17, right?). Realistically, how many people are going to replace their Linux and FreeBSD x86 servers with Windows 2000? That's a pretty massive risk, not to mention the enourmous amount of downtime and integrartion problems (a lot more than some companies - like ISPs, can handle, and more than any company wants to have). And of course Win2000 is not running on Alpha or UltraSPARC (to mention 2 popular server architechures), so if you've got any of those around, you'll SOL (not to mention PowerPC, HPPA, etc)

      I suspect that that vast majority of people using Windows 2000 are going to be people upgrading from 95/98/NT. And in the single user area, you can still dual boot, y'know. Personally, I'm waiting for at least 6 months to see if major problems crop up, then I'll replace 98 with 2000, and play Windows games on an SMP machine (hopefully by then I will have a dedicated Linux box)

    4. Re:More anti-Microsoft propaganda . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go. A story I submitted a couple days ago (aka counterexample).

      Equal Performance On Win2K Requires Much Faster Chip (articles,news) (rejected)

      Here's the URL (/. doesn't keep track of the text) over at C|net:

      http://www.gamecenter.com/News/Item/0,3,0-3775,00. html?

      Intel executives have said that Windows 2000 will " require computers with processors that are 150-MHz to 250-MHz faster than those that ran Windows NT or Windows 98 to deliver the same level of performance."


      In other words, AC criticizes /. over Microsoft coverage, so gets moderated up as Insightful.

  55. I am sad to say this, but RH is also a NSA plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anybody who things that the way RH was initially funded, and its warm and fuzzy relationship with "party big whigs," with inside tracks on IBM and Intel proprietaries etc, and the projectile appearance of Bob Young as the new OS-god via socialist media and wall street bankers, is one scintilla different from the wall-street: IBM-Intel funding of MS, and the bizarre decision by IBM to divest itself of control of its os and hand it over to an unknown teeny bopper OS god-thief, the trendy Bill Gates, needs to take a long look over their shoulder. They are identical and serve the same socialist banker 1-worlder ends.

    At first, Gates towed the line and was given a protected monopoly courtesy of DOJ. But, as time went on, Gates got greedy and this became a problem for NSA and friends. That he was set up by, i.e. fingered by, the wall-street socialist bankers who also controled NSA, IBM and Intel is beyond dispute. The usual deal was that, in return for an appointment from the financial gods, which results in unbounded theft-wealth, Gates was supposed to keep a low profile and tow the damn line. Instead, he got greedy and careless, and that became a motivation for and contributor to the birth and development of GNU and linux, both clearly a threat to NSA and the socialist bankers. GNU and linux turned a nice quiet apple cart upside down. The old boys must see that ultimately hardware controls are required for theft of information from private computers, and IBM and Intel are working feverously on that, but in the interim, RH is the new NSA-socialist banker flunkie, and Bob Young was given the appointment to supplant Bill Gates.

    The old boys are not yet done with Gates. Gate's disobedience and greed has really caused a mess for them, and it wlll be interesting to see what payment the old boys have in mind for Gates. My bet is that Gates will suffer a destiny for his greed and disobedience that Bob Young will never forget. It was definitely some Gates sympathizers who took out Union Carbide out of the DJIA (an industrial company) and substituted MS (a media giant), as that works as a kind of life insurance policy for Gates. (The DJIA is now over 51% big media and less than 49% industrial.)

    I am also sad to see that George Soros, a ruthless monster working for nazi bankers in wall street, has gotten his boot onto the neck of Torvalds at Transmedia. It will be interesting to see how Soros and the Murdock british-socialist media will try to somehow transform Torvalds into an enemy of the people. Trust me when I tell you this, with this boot on his neck, Torvalds' integrity will come under tremendous duress. He and the GNU will need our support. We live in interesting times.

  56. ...and FBI == internal by razvedchik · · Score: 1

    You are right here, only what the CIA does abroad, the FBI does internally.

    The NSA is just one of the means to give the US military an advantage in combat along the lines of the old warfare axiom "Get there the firstest with the mostest".

    BTW, it is illegal for the NSA to spy on US citizens unless authorized by the US Attorney General. In most cases, a violation of this is a career stopper, so everybody's scared of doing this.

    --
    I do what the voices on my console tell me to do.
  57. this also explains the PC architecture by Pflipp · · Score: 1

    The IBM PC has its bottleneck on the processor, being also responsible for I/O etc. This processor also has got to do big work just for backwards compatibility. The remaining time it is just doing NOPs on 500 mHz, because it needs to be fast (they say). This overstressed piece of hardware needs cooling.

    Now do the following calculation: the more important the computer, the bigger the CPU mHz must be, and the bigger and noisier the cooler.

    So these black heli's can come nearer to more important computers without being heard through the noise of the CPU ventilator (chop! chop! chop!).

    Strategic, eh?


    It's... It's...

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  58. Yeah, right by danorr · · Score: 1

    Such a conspiracy would require the NSA or MS to have some clue as to the course of electronic communications, and that the Internet would become as great a phenomena as it has been. Given the explosive growth of the medium took MS almost completely by surprise, they rushed to develop IE, and Netscape continued to kick their butts until they "leverag[ed] their OS advantage," I find this completely incredulous.

  59. Dumb communist statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bozo, there is a flaw with your suggestion. A package of freely distributable/modifiable is the pinnacle of democracy. You want communism, pick a closed source OS with hidden features.

    Get your McCarthy ass out of here.

    1. Re:Dumb communist statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah. Someone hit a nerve.

  60. It's on Agence France Presse by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 2

    3rd press office in the world. Largely subsidised by the French govt, BTW, but that's (maybe?) another story. Well, they're at least somewhat reliable.

  61. Who needs backdoors? by razvedchik · · Score: 1

    This is the WinXX world after all, and since networking was a later add-on, and security was an add-on to that, the security just isn't too reliable to start out with.

    --
    I do what the voices on my console tell me to do.
    1. Re:Who needs backdoors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you can! so please change your .sig

  62. NSA uses suns by razvedchik · · Score: 1

    Pretty Sparc20's with 21-inch monitors.
    Don't ask.

    --
    I do what the voices on my console tell me to do.
    1. Re:NSA uses suns by QuMa · · Score: 1

      >The problem with mailinglists is that you can't post as the anonymous coward.

      Why not? Just set the From: header to Anonymous Coward, or if you must, use an anonymous remailer.

    2. Re:NSA uses suns by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
      Pretty Sparc20's

      Nice to know they're using the latest and greatest hardware....

  63. It's on the AFP wire by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 2

    I checked, it's on the AFP wire. Not exactly a tabloid. (Disclaimer: I used to work there)

  64. The definition of "Working With" by Money__ · · Score: 3
    "A French intelligence report has accused U.S. secret agents of working with computer giant Microsoft."

    This is an interesting acusation, and may very well be true, but how does one define "working with"?

    1) Call Micros~1 tech support.
    2) Sit on hold for hours on end listening to the nail-grating advertisements.
    3) Listen to a tech pick up the phone and answer "wusup dude?"
    4) Explain how your windows peecee constanly locks up with a blue screen every time the computer actually gets used.
    5) Listen to the little dude squirm.

    Congradulations, you're "working with micros~1". The broad acusations in this press release could indeed be very true, but not relivant.

    Another interesting quote is: " the National Security Agency (NSA) helped install secret programmes on Microsoft software..."

    people install applications onto the os everyday! Does this mean there is some kind of link between the program being installed and the OS?
    _________________________

    1. Re:The definition of "Working With" by randombit · · Score: 1

      people install applications onto the os everyday! Does this mean there is some kind of link between the program being installed and the OS?

      Certainly. After all, it's a hell of a lot easier to install something nasty on a 95/98 box than a Linux or *BSD box. It can be done but it can sometimes take a fair amount of effort (especially if the person is security concious and prevents floppy booting, booting into single mode without a password, etc)

  65. This is as bad as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fluoridataion, the most wicked and dastardly communist conspiracy we have ever had to face.

    Through fluoridation the communists plan to sap and inpurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

    Did you know that there are currently studies under way to fluoridate flour, sugar, milk, icecream. Icecream, childrens icecream! That's how your hard core commie works.

    God be with you all. We will previal, in peace and purity of essence of our natural fluids.

    1. Re:This is as bad as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure communism would be the prefered tool of rule as dictated by your Lord Gates in Redmond, Capitol of the New World. Fluoridation is a feature and is free, just like Internet Explorer. Your cooperation is appreciated.

  66. Here comes the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bad. It took only a half an hour for the PR department to show up for work today.

  67. What bug? by hegemon · · Score: 1

    What about that bug in the first release of Win98? I must have been blind and deaf not to hear about it at the time. I think I'm still running the first release of that OS. Scary.

    1. Re:What bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you registered Windows, it sent all kinds of information about your hardware back to Microsoft (along with your name, address, Windows serial number, and any info you entered in the registration form), including a unique "hardware ID" (HWID). Look at the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion and see if there is an HWID value. Also try the same key under HKEY_CURRENT_USER, looking for some sort of "user id" (probably a long string of numbers/letters).

      Apart from not telling anyone that this info was collected, there was also a "buggy" ActiveX control included with IE/Windows that allowed any website to read your HWID (as well as your "user ID"). This means that Microsoft (and anyone else they gave their info to) could be tracking your movements across the web.

  68. Would not be the first time by noeld · · Score: 5
    We must also remember PROMIS. PROMIS was written by Inslaw and then used and modifiedby the govenment adding a secret 'trapdoor' access, modifying PROMIS and creating a bugged version which was sold to foreign government, intelligence, and police agencies, friend and foe, around the world.

    You can read more about it on WIRED.

    France has also complained about PROMIS.

    Bill Hamilton of Inslaw Corporation who was going after the government for stealing PROMIS gave this document to each member of the House Judicary Committee.

    and we must not forget that Crypto AG supplied encryption machines to over 120 countries. Officials from Iran, Iraq, and the Vatican, to name a few, relied on Crypto's tech for top secret dispatches and the NSA had a deal with Crypto, which gave them a backdoor that made those encrypted messages easy to decipher and they were not even a US company.

    Also what about Lotus Notes' NSA backdoor that is in international versions of the software.

    Noel

    RootPrompt.org -- Nothing but Unix

    1. Re:Would not be the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PROMIS - DSS tech... How does software create new hardware? Sorry, doesn't jive.

  69. Re:Fun Times by LarsG · · Score: 1

    As an ex NT admin, I take offense to that. :)

    The problem is that the demand for admins is higher than the supply. MS is very good at telling ties that MCP/MCSEs are highly qualified, while at the same time pushing their certifications to the masses - "get certified and double your salary". The result? A lot of MCP/MCSEs with little or no real-world experience.

    --
    If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  70. Re:Why windows isn't a... Score one for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REDMOND, Wash., Feb. 19, 2000 -- In the interest of clearing up any confusion about intended use, Microsoft has decided to rename its flagship product Microsoft Windows to Microsoft Downtime. Long criticized for its lack of any real security whatsoever, the newly rechristened MS-DT will feature extensive downtime periods followed by infrequent uptime which should insure against any possible security compromise of our numerous customers computer systems. Not merely an innovation, this name change marks the first time in computing history any software company has publicly demonstrated that product description can lead directly to better security, a problems whose best solution had long been thought to be obscurity. Patents are pending in the U.S. and jurisdictions abroad.

  71. My workplace keeps extensive records! by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    So I quit. Never felt better.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  72. no way!! by romco · · Score: 2

    Microsoft would never to anything to compermise our privacy. Microsoft is the leader in OS....

    <<ding>>>

    A fatal exception 0E has occured at F0AD:42494C4C
    The current application will be terminated.

    * Press any key to terminate the current application.
    * Press CTRL+ALT+DELETE again to restart your computer.
    You will lose any unsaved information in all applications.

    Press any key to continue

    Damnit! where the hell is the "any" key?

    --
    AdFuel
    1. Re:no way!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That hasn't happened to me since, damn... 1995?

      You must be pretty dumb.

  73. Its Not That I'm Paranoid..... by quakeaddict · · Score: 1

    ...but everyone is out to get me.

    heheheheh

    --
    I'm still working on a clever footer.
  74. Does anyone remember the Image Data fiasco? by symbolic · · Score: 3

    About a year ago, there were several stories about how the Department of Motor Vehicles in four states were selling citizens' personal information, including the drivers' license photos, to a private company in New Hampshire (Image Data). The focus of this company was a system that would allow merchants to visually identify consumers, via the photos, and as such (it was alleged) would reduce fraud.

    I watched a newscast shortly after the initial story broke, where an official from one of the four states was *very* ticked off at this company for misleading him with respect to their source of funds. Apparently, it was discovered that the company had received about $1.5 million from the U.S. Secret Service. Read about it at http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/2160 7.html

    So, while the notion that the NSA is in bed with Bill might seem a little far-fetched, this incident with Image Data makes the NSA/Microsoft issue seem a little more plausible.

  75. CDC really a front and other musings by B.+Samedi · · Score: 2

    Here's one for you. Maybe the NSA is funding the Cult of the Dead Cow so that they can make tools for them! It makes sense. They couldn't have made BO and BO2K by themselves. It's just too well done.

    It has to be the work of a evil agency bent on getting the UN into power as the one world government (never mind that the bulk of UN troops are United States AND the United States has a ultimate veto power in the Security Council).

    I think stories like this are generally a little far fetched. As for the NSA key I think the Crypto Newsletter from Counterpane said it best. If you want to put a key into a program you don't put your agency name on it where anyone can see it.

    This is the NSA. They do know a little about security and something this stupid is a little below them. After all if Windows is as insecure as everyone keeps saying why do they need to put some secret key in? They can just go in like any script kiddie and see what they want.

    As for the DOS argument about trying to get a standard system in place... was DOS really that powerful or was I missing something? Windows I could kinda see but DOS? Never mind most of the major corporations they would want to spy on at the time were using UNIX or some other kind of heavy duty OS.

    How did the NSA know that Microsoft would be well recieved? Maybe everyone would fall in love with the MAC and use it instead and then the NSA would be up a creek. Also the countries that the NSA would be most interested in (Sudan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Cuba, etc) can't have computers exported to them anyway. This whole thing is full of holes if you just take a moment to think about it from a logical point of view.


    1. Re:CDC really a front and other musings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think stories like this are generally a little far fetched. As for the NSA key I think the Crypto Newsletter from Counterpane said it best. If you want to put a key into a program you don't put your agency name on it where anyone can see it.

      Yes, you see, but they relied on Microsoft to implement it.

    2. Re:CDC really a front and other musings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the NSA thought in advance that the public would be easily pacified by the confusion created by such a simple argument.

      This cannot possibly be the NSA key because it is called the NSA key.

      Sounds like solid reasoning to me.

    3. Re:CDC really a front and other musings by B.+Samedi · · Score: 1

      Good point. But think on it for just a moment. They are going to put in a serious hole into the encryption security so that they can help themselves to whatever is floating around on Windows boxes. Do you think they will trust Microsoft to do it? Or do you think they will check it over a few times to make sure there's no screw ups. This is the agency that managed to stay pretty much a secret for almost thirty years after all.


  76. But if they're black heli's, ... by Sehnsucht · · Score: 1

    you wouldn't hear em, right?

  77. could it be true? by criticalrealist · · Score: 1
    The best argument against the report is that the NSA would never have relied on Billy Gates, a 20 year old kid, to do their dirty work for them. It's just too risky for the NSA's supposed plans, considering that Gates might have turned against them. Microsoft didn't hire many gray haired veterans until later down the road.

    To continue, why would the NSA need Microsoft to force IBM to comply with its wishes? IBM has always been in bed with all levels of the government.

    A good argument for the rumor is that the US intelligence community's modus operandi is to start up "front" companies to serve as cover for whatever black op they are about to take on. Could Microsoft have started as such a "front" company?

    Who knows? It's just idle speculation.

    A denial by the big M wouldn't be convincing. The only way to find out would be a massive lawsuit against Microsoft that would force it to open up its vaults of internal documents & memoranda to public scrutiny. The tobacco companies recently faced such an onslaught. Oh, wait. That lawsuit is "United States v. Microsoft." The private antitrust suits, like that of Caldera, are probably going to be settled out of court. No production of documents, I guess.

    We'll never know unless there is a political movement in the US that demands change in the intelligence community.

    Oh my god! Just as I was about to post this, I lost my net connection! LOL. ROTF.

    --
    I am not a lawyer.
  78. M$ Funded by NSA by rlp · · Score: 1

    Well, that would certainly explain Gates refusal to make Windows open source. I guess the guys from Fort Meade need to have a talk with Janet Reno. Only thing it doesn't explain is the black helicopter hovering outside my window. :-)

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  79. French Inteligence by goat_attack · · Score: 1

    french inteligence... isn't that an oxymoron?

    1. Re:French Inteligence by szo · · Score: 2

      No, you mixed it with american intelligence...

      Szo

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
    2. Re:French Inteligence by goat_attack · · Score: 1

      HA HA I'm an American I'll sue you! It's the American way!

  80. How about the other way around? by IbrahimC · · Score: 1

    Well, I've been saying something like this for ages. Only it's the other way around. Why would the government try to disrupt and destroy MS if MS was it's biggest spy? Seems coutner-productive. Taking teh chance to seem uninformed, I'll present a little strange, but possible possibility. Perhaps the feds are attacking MS because they AREN'T spies, and refuse to be spies. IBM, and other big folks have been helped along in their lives by Government contracts, which we all know pay 5 times as much for things. So, here's MS uncontrolled by the government, so the feds decide to burn them. Seems like a plausible situation. Atleast it would probably make a good movie. Imagine Bill strapped to a chair being drugged and interrogated. Hypnotizing him "You WANT to work with us" then he bites the guys nose off... well, maybe it's been done before. Anyway, no evidence, but that's what conspiracy theories are, aren't they?

    --
    Ibrahim "When did we stop using cups?"
  81. Dos? How? There wasn't much connectivity. by leko · · Score: 1

    I could sort of believe this to be true with windows. With everyone and their parents, grandparents, etc, on the internet, this might have use. Get windows to allow agents to connect to your machine and spy on you. That is very far fetched, it would be easy to do, and havn't there been stinks in the past about certain programs sending off info without asking first? Same sort of thing.

    However, I find this story to be unbelievable because it supposedly started as early as dos. Most dos computers were not hooked up to the internet. The internet was still Darpa net during most of dos's years wasn't it? Anyways, the point is how would the NSA have been able to spy anyways? They would have to physically be at the comptuer, and well.... dos is not at all secure, anyone could "spy" on someone if they were sitting at the suspects dos box.

    1. Re:Dos? How? There wasn't much connectivity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good question. Bulletin boards and Fidonet mailer software was fairly popular in the DOS era. Backdoors may have been built in some BBS or terminal packages. There were also things called fossil drivers, that rquired to be used on some BBSs. These were designed intercept and buffer information sent to the modem to make communications work better. But none of these were made by Microsoft.

      I wouldn't be surprised if MS has NSA contracts, But the way the article is worded it sounds like
      poorly-cooked conspiracy theory.

  82. ascii art by G27+Radio · · Score: 2


    naivete paranoia
    ---------------------------------
    /\
    /__\

    ok, maybe it's not art.

    numb

    1. Re:ascii art by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      hmm. nevermind.

      numb

  83. No Wonder They Don't Use Macs by Bill+Daras · · Score: 1

    I guess that is the reason there is so much pressure from higher ups to replace Macs in the govornemnt workplace. Regardless of how well they work.

    Steve Jobs used to be a big ant-establishment guy back in the day. I guess he wouldn't let them spy.

  84. Le screen bleu de meure! C'est bien votre faute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's just the problem. MS never fixes anything. They rewrite and release totally new versions of their software with totally new bugs. Had they actually gone back and fixed things, Win 3.x, and Win9x ought to be rock solid stable by now, right? But are they? Nope. Intead we have a prepetual series of unstable software.

    In the upcoming months, we'll no doubt hear about how "evil hackers" will "exploit" holes in Windows 2000 and copy sensitive data (coying is never theft and I refuse to call it that) or hose networks or crash machines. The media and MS will attempt to place all blame squarely on the h4xx0r instead of where a great deal of that blame belongs... on morons who deliberately made themselves vulnerable by installing a new and barely tested product that even at release time was still known to have tens of thousands of bugs, yet they installed it anyway. Who is really the hax0r d00d breaking security here?

  85. CIA has written DDOS protection tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    According to ABC the CIA has written DDOS tools. (Distributed Denial of Service) wonder if there are spy-doors in them.

    Read about it at RootPrompt.org -- Nothing but Unix.

  86. Paranoia by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

    The article is mostly the antology of a paranoia tale that roamed before Net days. "Why MS-DOS has so many holes? Because the NSA, CIA, FBI, the Shadow Government are behind this..."

    It is no more than this. It seems that jounalists, without having ANYTHING new to publish, decided to hunt down on more deeper waters. The result? They are publishing urban legends as news...

    But... Don't trust more Microsoft by this. THEY DO A LOT to get some info about you and your use of computers. The "lemedofoyou" philosophy of their OSes hides a dangerous system of information gathering. Besides more and more they bound this philosophy on your computer use. Wanna get a patch? "lemedofoyou". Wanna get a new program? "lemedofoyou" Wanna search for something on the net? "lemedofoyou"

    But for "lemedofoyou" to work they must know something about you. And they gather some info. Presently it looks that this information gathering is not very substantial. Maybe because it is gathered by a few bits each time. So the whole may be much worser.

    And this information can be used for very dangerous purposes. It can be sold to NSA, CIA, FBI, the Shadow Government... Or worse. It can leak and be sold to snake oil sellers, major corporations, religious sects and even leak into the criminal environments. Imagine someone getting thousands of credit card numbers from satisfied Microsoft customers.

  87. Almost Certainly Hype by Alik · · Score: 1

    No sources named. In a paper which has been pointed out by another poster to have the tabloid nature.

    You know what this probably is? Someone in France heard about NSAKEY. This got mentioned in a report as "Probably not actually related to the NSA, but we're putting a note on it in the We-Hate-Microsoft file." This in turn gets transmitted via friend-of-friend through three or four hops, reaches The Age, and you've got this lovely article.

    Nothing new here, folks.

    Alik

  88. MS financed by NSA by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 0

    I trust french even less than Microsoft.

  89. Distributed.net? by pimp · · Score: 2

    Of course! It all makes sense now! Microsoft really pioneered distributed.net, and is using MS Office as a client to process Echelon data. I wondered my PC kept getting slower.

    1. Re:Distributed.net? by knarf · · Score: 1

      Now that is an intriguing idea. I think we can trust the distributed.net folks, but it *would* be rather easy for them to use their clienst for other purposes besides the usual contest-cracking. The clients are distributed in binary form, so it is not easy to determine what they're doing. The data the clients fetch from the server may be part of a cracking contest data block. Then again, it may also be part of whatever encrypted data block they want to know the contents of.

      [Trust noone. Keep your laser handy. The computer is your friend.]

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
  90. Now if this was the other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you told me it was the French intelligence community that had done something like this I might just believe it. The Frech have shown themselves willing to do almost anything. Ask greenpeace. Ask any of the other groups that have irrated the French. But the US??? Come on now the US belives in things like people reporting on thier employers. The US could never keep something like this quiet for very long. It just flies against everything that is American. The French or the English maybe but the US really believes itself to be the "good guy". You have to like Americans for that. Where else but America would anybody complaining about the President having an affair with an intern? Or lying about the affair? The American sense of right/wrong is so deeply ingrained Americans see EVERYTHING as wrong. Some one would have squeeled by now.

  91. The reason I don't believe this by theSheep · · Score: 1

    Whatever, the spy tools are, I cannot imagine them in Win 2000. As the DOJ trial is going on, at least the POSSIBILITY of open-sourcing Windows is being discussed. If it were open-sourced, such things would be easy to detect--and then MS gets its pants sued off by millions of angry users. They don't want that.

    --
    -- The Sheep --
  92. oppernerd abuses children!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont think this is true but, despite the fact im a journalist i'll post it anyway. just so we can getv in a few pops on microsoft, sorry Micro$$$$~1~1~1. thank you.

  93. My W2K computer? by Paladeen · · Score: 1

    My W2K computer?

    Sorry, you got the wrong guy here. I'm sensible, so I use an Apple running LinuxPPC.

  94. Ya gotta love the French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not for their cuisine, their women or their language, at least for their sense of humor.

  95. "French Intelligence" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    French Intelligence? Isn't that a misnomer?

    1. Re:"French Intelligence" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't suppose that Americans have the monopoly over intelligence. French did vote the first law protecting privacy as early as 1979. Americans are only followers. You are always eager to criticise micro$oft, but you cannot stand that it comes from foreign sources. You obviously show that the problem with the microsoft's way of thinking is much more related to your so called american culture. You only have the word culture, not the content...

    2. Re:"French Intelligence" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former employee of an information gathering group, I remember that the French were pretty good at what they did.

      As far as the NSA and M$ working together, it would be naive to think that they are not. Do *not* underestimate the NSA. they are a fantastic bunch of guys. When you are on the inside, you don't think of what is morally right or wrong, you just do the job. All MS neeeds to do is inform them of ways to compromise the system. There doesn't need to be any code installed.

      The focus of the intelligence agencies has been industrial espionage. The cold war was an economic war. The difference is, the focus has changed. I have no doubt that the intelligence agencies world wide pass information to the corporate bosses. You must understand that M$ could be getting good intelligence from the NSA in exchange for allowing them access.

      Every country spies, and every country knows the other country spies on them. If China and France wants to ban W2K because of the security aspects, they are probably acting on good informantion.

      People don't like the French because the French act in their own self interest. Heaven forbid!!!

      People who dis the French probably have never been there or met anyone from there.

    3. Re:"French Intelligence" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I do agree with the majority of your statement, I feel the need to add a few things. 1) I really can't see M$ and NSA cooperation existing only in the form of trading back doors. If the NSA wanted to find back doors in MS products I'm sure they could do it all on their own. The average IQ at the office there is probably pushing 170. 2) I have been to france, and I'm sorry but from my experience, they are arrogant assholes (and not just to foreigners either). Thanks, Fabje (polof@alleg.edu)

    4. Re:"French Intelligence" by deboute · · Score: 1

      i remember of a conference i attended where the spokesman was a colonel of the french intelligence services.

      He started his allocution with these words ::
      'our FRIENDS, the americans (as our governement say they are our friends), hold all the market of hardware design and software.
      As there were once the 'advocacy act' (which allows any society to ask for the gov. administrative help to got contracts [yes, the NSA is administrative help]), we can think it is very easy for our FRIENDS to bribe some ingeneers to make backdoors (hard or soft) for their intelligence services .'

      the man was VERY bitter and jaleaous.
      I understand him (as he got only a few credits), and understand the US gov.

      Why wouldn't they give them the weapons to acquire economic supremacy (more than they ever got) ?...see the echelon affair...

    5. Re:"French Intelligence" by tech_imp · · Score: 1
      I would agree with you. That each country is going to spy for its best intrests.

      The French are good. Their track record is among the best.

      Although the practicality of getting this pulled off would be pretty hard. Belive it or not MS has lots of testers and testers tend to find these things.

      Also it would be hard to hide ... I just can't see how you could bury it unless you worked directly with a programer.

      It would be eaiser for the NSA to insert special 'builds' into a hostile environment vs having all of Windows with a neat little security hole.

      As a final note ... MS has a whole lot of non-US citizens running around which could stumble into this and spill the beans.

      Even though I'm shooting holes in the possiblity of this happening ... things like this have in the past.

    6. Re:"French Intelligence" by macnehl · · Score: 1

      Arrogant assholes? Look who is talking. Anybody who doesn't cave in to the American Way is an asshole? I wonder what kind of experiences you had in France. Most likely any mishap was caused by your clumsy approach to a different culure. You do speak French, I suppose? How can you judge like this... Sorry for you. Friedrich

      --
      ...wysiwyg!
    7. Re:"French Intelligence" by fedos · · Score: 1

      Not to blow up your argument, but the US did have its Pricacy Act in 1974, half a decade before 1979; unless you're using a different calendar over there. PS the French are arrogant. They can't help it, it's genetic.

    8. Re:"French Intelligence" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      privacy my @$$

      In the US you come home after work and you can tune into Fox TV and see your coworkers caught red handed doing dunno what by cameras hidden by their employers.

      Do that in France and you go straight to jail as an employer.

  96. Reduce costs and risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is one thing you all must agree: Using back doors in operating systems to spy foreign countries is a lot cheaper than all the other spying techniques they were using in the past. It's also a lot more safe for secret agents: they can spy foring computers in theit homes/offices... There is also another thing: if you have an infiltrated agent inside one organisation, you can use your knowlagde in back doors to get access to classified information, that otherwise even that agent wouldn't be able to get. The main reason that makes me beleive that this is true it's economical: this is a much more efiecient way of getting information.

  97. That seems consistent. by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 1

    The findings are entirely consistent with the other things I've read about Microsoft and the Shadow Government.

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  98. I thought Napoleon said that. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Although he probably said it in French.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:I thought Napoleon said that. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I thought he did too. (Possibly because you did. I picked the info up on Slashdot anyway.)
      But that doesn't mean that Heinlein wouldn't say it.

      <joke>He was a mature author.</joke>

      --
      "Immature authors borrow, mature authors steal" and I think that that quote is from Heinlein.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  99. Round manhole by vadim · · Score: 1

    "why are manhole covers round?" anyone?

    Because that is the only shape that the cover can not fall through the hole.

    1. Re:Round manhole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because that is the only shape that the cover can not fall through the hole.

      Not entirely true. If the lip of the hole that actually supports the cover is wide enough, pretty much any shape can be used and the lid won't fall through. But the circle is unique in that any size lip is sufficient.

  100. And the Chinese have been working with Micorsoft by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    ...to destroy the productivity of the US workforce.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  101. Why was This moderated as FLAMEBAIT ??? by FrankW · · Score: 1

    Mmhhh, somebody decided my post was FLAMEBAIT, whoever did that, feel free to e-mail me to explain....

    someonelse thought it was "overrated", well....

  102. I wonder if I could bill the Bill? by threaded · · Score: 1

    One reason I finally switched over all my boxes to Linux was that my LAN kept autodialling onto the 'Net for no good reason, and incidentally running up a huge 'phone bill. Traced eventually to just the Windows boxes sending packets to some printer...

  103. hey... mebbie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't this also explain why it took so long for the anti trust suit? just something to think about sirLOL (i forgot my pass)

  104. Sickening... by fvzappa · · Score: 1

    How the majority of you people can just accept this rumour as "Fact" simply because it's Microsoft. Come ON! There's the slight chance that the NSA used their time machine to predict that Microsoft would become successful and that the IBM PC would become the most popular home/business computer system so that they could force IBM to use MS DOS back in 1980, I suppose... if you're a paranoid conspiracy theorist. I realize that Microsoft is not the greatest software company out there. Windows 9x is buggy. Windows 2000 isn't bug free either. But accusing them of this is ridiculous. I suggest all you teenaged "rebels without a cause" out there stop choosing Microsoft as your cause. You look like idiots. Yes, I expect this will be moderated as a troll, though it's not.

  105. This is suppy by Fulcrum · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this seems somewhat sully to you? The French intelligence, nevertheless! I would have some suspicions of this was reported by the Israel's MOSSAD but the French... On the other hand, this is a probably another way for people to make them feel better about their own stupidity!

  106. Firsthand account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm an SDET (Software Dev. in Test) at MS. The Manhole cover is the caliber they ask interns. Here are some questions I was asked:

    1. You have four chains each with three links. Make a continuous loop out of them by making only three cuts. You can only cut one link per, and no tying the chains together!

    2. There's a lightproof room with three lightbulbs inside, and three lightswitches on the outside, and one door. Set the switches however you want, and then open the door. Once you open the door to the room, you can't touch the lightswitches.

    You're wrong when you said that you're judged on the quickness & correctness of the answers (though if you're given the manhole question, you probably would be), but rather your eagerness to tackle difficult tasks, analysis of the problem space, etc. Many of the problems like #1 map to pointer math algorithms.

    Also, some questions asked don't have answers (give them an NP problem & ask to solve in P time & see if they recognize it as such) or have multiple answers (the lightbulb problem above), or the interviewer is asking just to see how you think & don't even know the answer to ("how many manhole covers are in the US?")

    As for the average IQ, I'd say 130 avg is a safe estimate. I've tested 3 times, all in the 130-140 range. Though there are exceptions - I'm mentoring a new hire who I want to scream "RTFM!" to every time she asks me how to do something basic in VB.

    1. Re:Firsthand account by Shotnicam · · Score: 1
      You have four chains each with three links. Make a continuous loop out of them by making only three cuts. You can only cut one link per, and no tying the chains together!

      seems fairly easy, cut all three links of one of the chains, use the individual links to connect the ends of the remaining chains.

      i used to host a brainteaser mailing list, and though i've never seen that one, i have used several similar.

      im not so certain about the lightswitches, would probably put 2 up, one down... because up is usually on, but would want one in case they happen to be different... perhaps i'm completely off :)

      the manhole cover was one i was asked when interviewing for a small software company when in college, i started laughing when he asked it :)

      thanks for responding, i have heard (or read) a few rumors to that effect, and though i have no intention of ever applying, i do find it interesting. and now, if someone asks, i'll know a little more... and isnt that what life is all about? learning a little more each day (though i must question my choice of subject)

      and no, i have never used VB, nor do i plan on ever playing with it. :)

      no .sig please

    2. Re:Firsthand account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "how many manhole covers are in the US?"

      One for every manhole!

      (This information has been brought to you by the inventor of XYLOFUN (remember that word)).

    3. Re:Firsthand account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops; my brain fart in asking the 3 lightbulbs question -- the goal is to figure out which switches go with which lights, notto walk into a lighted room.

      As for the chains; you got it. There's a more insidious way (which escapes me) of asking the question in stages so it requires a more nonlinear thought process.

      Anyway, the point is, MS employees aren't really much different from other developers, just a different set of skills & goals.

      BTW, just to prove I'm human: I do run Linux on both of my computers (OCd 300As) at home.
      Kudos on the VB. :^)

      In summary, contrary to A.C. opinion, we don't sacrafice penguins in fiery nocturnal rituals while an infinite number of monkeys and men in black code our stuff.

    4. Re:Firsthand account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *LOL*

      Do you work for Micro$oft???

      sig: I don't speak French, I just kiss that way ;-)

    5. Re:Firsthand account by ptbrown · · Score: 1
      I want to scream "RTFM!" to every time she asks me how to do something basic in VB.

      Isn't everything done in VB "basic"?

      *ducks* Sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
    6. Re:Firsthand account by khiron · · Score: 1

      >2. There's a lightproof room with three lightbulbs inside, and three lightswitches on the outside, and one door. Set the switches however you want, and then open the door. Once you open the door to the room, you can't touch the lightswitches. But you can touch the light bulbs. turn on A & B, wait 1 minute, then turn off B. Enter the room, A is on, C is off and cold, B is off and warm.

  107. Conspiracy theory? by Crixus · · Score: 3
    This may or may not be true, but people too often dismiss such reports as conspiracy theories because the naive little word they live in would crumble if they believed any branch of their beloved US gov't would ever do anything corrupt or unlawful. So to them stories such as these HAVE to be conspiracy theories.

    However, right now, the US gov't is engaging in activities both in this country and others which in 5 years will eventually get reported and dismissed as "conspiracy theories" and in 20 years will be found to be fact, and those same people who were calling them conspiracy theories will then apologize for the "one time" error the government made and then believe they won't do it again. (after all, the gov't SAID they wouldn't do it again....).

    The problem is, our government does horrible things as a part of POLICY, and this will never change until we get a real democracy.

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
    1. Re:Conspiracy theory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed democrats vs republicans isn't democracy look democracy up in the dictionary if you don't believe me i believe the correct term for the current political system in the US is oligocracy, but i'm not sure of that

  108. Re:Slashdot FUDing again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A FUDing we will go, a FUDing we will go, hi-ho silver, a FUDing we will go. FUDster rama!

  109. The ultimate "capitalist" is ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ,,those that eliminate their competition and become monopolies. In free societies there is a possibility that this is done through a superior product however a socialist system ,which makes competition illegal, is far more reliable for the dominant class. The worst case is centralized power and this includes the ruling elite in socialist and communist governments that would claim to prevent such an event. I am always in a state of consternation when people such as you disparage political organizations in the form of the United States that reduce the centralization of power to a greater degree than other systems. The whistle blower is rarely the stand up citizen who knows very little about the criminal culture, but rather the informant with their own questionable past. It is Netscape and Sun who have exposed MS not a band of Boy Scouts. The motives of Sun and Netscape are irrelevant to the public good which is served nevertheless. Do you suggest that an equal poverty is best? The result of sententious caterwauling just reinforces the bias of the unobservant. You fall prey to the folly of destroying the good for the unattainable. I agree with you on one point, humans are evil as nature intended but humans can, through discipline, overcome this nature and do good. This is why the origins of existentialism and communism should not be stripped of their Chistian heritage because Christianity warns us of our natures. If you don't believe me study your history. The first communists were the early Christians and the first existentialist was Kierkegaard(himself a Chistian). Never once did they espouse equality by force of law. "If anyone will not work than neither shall he eat" -Paul, "The laborer is worthy of his wages" -Christ. The rich were to give to the poor, not the poor to take from the rich, yes there is a difference. The modern socialist governments removed the Chistian origins and twisted the whole philosophy to achieve the ultimate mockery of "to each according to his needs and from each according to his means". The Romans had a saying "who watches the watchers". I ask you what system would work if humans are by in large evil? At least in the US evil entities my neutralize themselves but under your apparent solution, which must not be capitalism, there is no such hope. So please keep your own rationalizations to yourself and realize that if the boardroom no longer serves than those same people will move to parliament.

  110. GetPrivateProfileString() by RobertGraham · · Score: 2
    The same sort of paranoia goes everwhere. A customer did a 'strings' against our product, then made all sorts of paranoid accusations about how our product is a tool of the FBI/Microsoft used to spy on people. For example, we use the Windows API GetPrivateProfileString() in order to read configuration files. The paranoid interpretation is, of course, that we are attempting to read private secrets from the customer. Anyway, we posted the full rant to our website (along with our rebuttal, of course) here

    (Moral of the story: decompile you product and remove any strings that a paranoid might interpret incorrectly).

    1. Re:GetPrivateProfileString() by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link is bad.

  111. Next episode: Microsoft teams up MPAA by cfish · · Score: 1


    Next episode: Microsoft teams up MPAA--
    Microsoft Windows2000 searches for DeCSS on your hard drive and send your ip directly to MPAA's lawyers.

    Nah, MPAA won't be able to afford it.

  112. The beauty of closed source by whoop · · Score: 3

    See, this shows just how beautiful CS companies can be. Not only can Microsoft declare their programs the most secure, best, or whatever (and no one can refute it without cracking it), but the other side can make outlandish claims (and there's no way to refute it without looking at the source). If anyone makes these claims about Linux, Apache, etc, we can easily say, "Here's the source code, point out where it's spying on you and we'll remove it." All Microsoft can say about this is, "Um, no we're not. Buy Windows 2000 though."

  113. Black Helicopters whirring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the black helicopters were silent?? :)

  114. Clarification by Serf · · Score: 1

    I posted that primarily as a request for whacked out theories, but it now appears that I should clarify a little.

    There's probably nothing in particular about this story that got it blocked. It was on the website of a Western news source, most of which happen to be blocked.

    Off the top of my head, blocked sites that I've tried to go to include:

    CNN, NYT, LA Times, San Jose Mercury whatever, the Washington Post, the Boston Times (I think), _not_ BBC News (curiously enough), The Age (the Australian newspaper that published this), Xoom, Geocities, Angelfire, Tripod, and the US House of Representatives.

    Anonymizer.com and Proxymate.com are my friends.

  115. This is not as absurd as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go check what CNN had to say about this two years ago:

    http://cnn.com/TECH/computing/9807/27/security.i dg/

  116. Why IBM did use MS-DOS by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1
    and that IBM was made to accept the (Microsoft) MS-DOS operating system by the same administration.

    I don't believe that IBM was forced by the NSA to use MS-DOS, remember that at the time Microsoft wasn't the big huge monopoly they are today, if this theory was slightly true this would have been mroe probable to either have the NSA team with IBM to implement the back door or the NSA teaming up with Digital Research, the company doing CP/M of which QDOS (that was bought by MS and barely modified to be sold to IBM with the name MS-DOS) was a clone for the Intel processor.

    Ok, I got it, they were forced to team up with MS because the guys at IBM were unable to do sloppy programs with lots of security holes in them ;)

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    1. Re:Why IBM did use MS-DOS by Detritus · · Score: 2

      Gary Kildall, the author of CP/M, was in the Naval Reserve and was on the faculty of the Naval Postgraduate School. Bill Gates was a young college dropout from a wealthy family. I think the NSA would have been more comfortable working with Kildall and Digital Research.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  117. Ceci, n'est pas un troll! by Quintus · · Score: 1
    "Not bad. It took only a half an hour for the PR department to show up for work today."

    Ceci, n'est pas un troll!!

    I thought it rather witty!

    -Quintus

    --
    He who fights and runs away,

  118. ? by termite666 · · Score: 1

    Didn't the US accuse the French of using Tempest technology for industrial esponage abord their airplanes (Air France)

  119. Doesn't make sense by grappler · · Score: 3

    What would MSDOS have to do with spying on communications back when IBM included it with their PCs?

    It wasn't even a network operating system, and the Internet was not exactly a widely used public network at the time.

    --
    grappler

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  120. IBM not forced by jfwcc · · Score: 1

    -
    ...to use "MS DOS".

    They had the hardware, but no OS.
    Gates knew someone how hacked an OS.
    He [Bill Gates] bought it for pocket money,
    sold it to IBM.

    In case you don't remember:
    "DOS" was called "Quick and DIRTY OPERATING SYSTEM" at that time.
    george./

  121. Prove it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the French, it's "their way" or "no way." We've saved their butt so many times and they still think the US is out to get them. If MS software is sending spy information then it should be easy to prove just by monitoring all the traffic from a particular machine loaded to the gills with Windows, office, etc etc. They won't do this to prove anything because ... their isn't anything to prove! Surprise! Sad. Selfish. Arrogant. Typical.

  122. NSA & Outside the US by jfwcc · · Score: 1

    -
    Please let me remind you,

    1.
    that US agencies prevented folks like me (I live in Europe) from having stronger encryption.

    2.
    Encryption not possible to decrypt by US agencies are considered WEAPONS and not released, even not to US citizens.

    3.
    Those of us who use a Unix flavor still are possible victims due to cookies and redirects.
    (Please don't tell me I'm wrong about cookies unless you really know what they are, AND what Java can do.)

    4.
    Two words: SETEC ASTRONOMY

    5.
    One word: FEMA

    george./

  123. racist rob miller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (SFX: Black helicopters whirring overhead.)

    What, do black helicopters sound different than other helicopters?

    You fucking racist pig.

  124. Note to US taxpayers about US intelligence in .fr by Submarine · · Score: 1
    [1. "This report, drawn up by the Strategic Affairs Delegation (DAS), the intelligence arm of the French Defence Ministry". Hmm. Isn't the defense intelligence agency called the DRM (Direction du Renseignement Militaire)?]

    2. There have been occasionnal concerns in the French political world that reliance on foreign (read here: american) software could pose a security problem, since it can potentially contain backdoors left for US intelligence to spy on officials and industries.

    There have already been attempts by the United States to influence the politics of France, as shown in this document from the US Senate. I guess American taxpayers won't be happy to learn that their tax money was used to fund an "union" of posh French students whose main activity is to put political stickers on just about every flat surface they can.

    With this precedent in mind, it is therefore not sheer paranoia to think that US intelligence still tries to influence the politics of allied democratic governments, including France.

  125. NSA forcing IBM to accept MS-DOS by Avial · · Score: 1

    It is very possible that IBM was forced to accept MS-DOS because when IBM first began development of an encryption system for DES in the early 70s, the NSA forced them to reduce the key length to 56 bits from 128 bits so that they could more easily crack the encryption. Two opponents of reducing IBM's key length estimated that a 56 bit encrypted message could be cracked in about 10 hours for a cost of $5000. Whereas an 128 bit key would cost about $200 septrillion or $200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 and god knows how long.

    --
    help a poor college grad get a free Mac Mini
  126. How is this vacuous comment insightful? by Jayson · · Score: 1

    It says nothing. The poster rants about the US govt doing illegal things now, that in 20 years will be known fact. Yet does he ever try to support his point? Does he offer any evidence of these attrocities. I am willing to concede that the govt has some illegal, abusive policies, but they are nothing compared to the pointless gloom the posted is trying to make you all believe in.

    This is just, yet another case of the moderators rewarding comments that they believe in, regardless of content.

    disgruntled slashdot user who think that moderation is becoming a joke,
    -jason

    1. Re:How is this vacuous comment insightful? by Crixus · · Score: 2
      How is this vacuous comment insightful? It says nothing. The poster rants about the US govt doing illegal things now, that in 20 years will be known fact. Yet does he ever try to support his point?

      On the whole I agree with this poster's complaints. I have said the same thing many times.

      HOWEVER.

      I was not attempting to do anything with that post but paint a general picture in the abstract. I have dozens of posts currently on /. and many of them have the very facts for which you ask.

      --
      Ignore Alien Orders
  127. You've obviously never swiped a manhole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're very useful, I've heard.

  128. Even if it's not true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It does not really matter if this story is correct. Even if it's not true, there is no way for Microsoft to defend themselves against these accusations, unless they are prepared to make their source code public. (Including compilers and details about their builds, to the degree that one could acutally check that the shipped binaries contain nothing but the published code.)

    If you are an individual or a small business, you may not care and consider the chances that the NSA is spying on you an unlikely risk. But if you are in government, would you trust a foreign vendor's word when your national secrets, and those of your countries major corporations on which your global competitiveness depends, are at stake? The answer must surely be no, and the French goverment are slowly coming around to this conclusion.

    So expect to see more stories like this in the news. Even if none will ever be verified, they will permanently change the public perception about the risks of proprietary software from foreign monopolies.

  129. NSA has bigger things to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Could the NSA do gather information about you from your computer and your online activity? Probably. Does the US government work with the private sector to develop ways and means to do such things? Probably.

    But consider this: I seriously doubt anyone at NSA gives a rat's ass about you, your computer or the fact that you took a peek at those obviously faked Natalie Portman pictures.

    It's much more likely that *for the most part* American intelligence services work to keep it's citizens safe. Which seems more plausible: The NSA spending millions developing techniques to spy on internet users, or the NSA using that same money to prevent some asshole from detonating a truck bomb in your face?

    The people who make up the various intelligence services, by and large, are just regular people with the same morals and sense of conscience as anyone else. They just happen to do a very specialized job.

    Are there some bad seeds? Surely. You find them in every walk of life.

    While we should remain vigilent for infractions into our privacy, we should also be very thankful for all the Trade Center bombings that never happened due to people at places like the NSA.

    To demonize an agency as huge as NSA with these... moronic incoherent paranoid ramblings suggest that many people, especially in the US, take too much for granted.

    1. Re:NSA has bigger things to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a peek at those obviously faked Natalie Portman pictures.

      Read my lips: paparazzi.

  130. humans are not inherently evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is our culture which makes us evil. we do not live with nature anymore. we are consuming this planet like cancer. there are other cultures who remember that humans are still a part of nature, but they are being consumed. western culture needs to adapt or humanity will go extinct. fascism must be stopped.

  131. Fascist Conspiracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this explain all of the crazy stuff that's been going on in the world recently? Has our government been taken over by some corporate-spawned fascist conspiracy? I normally don't believe in conspiracy theories but this one seems frighteningly plausible. ph33r The Man, indeed.

  132. Re:NSA: world police or international robber ? by mat · · Score: 1

    OK, I have no comment on the work of NSA for protecting the poor americans's life against the dangerous terrorists.
    But, when the NSA listens french prime-minister's phone communications in order to know his intentions for international negociations or intercepts Thomson's or Airbus's commercial proposals allowing american corporations to win contracts, I call that a theft.

    Americans companys are not competitive enought to win contracts honestly ?

  133. Ironically... by skew · · Score: 1

    Hey didn't anyone else notice that The Age actually tries to set a cookie for the entire .com.au domain?

    It's the JavaScript ad banner, which responds with the following header:

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Connection: close
    Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 02:46:05 GMT
    Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6
    Content-Type: application/x-javascript
    Client-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 02:48:04 GMT
    Client-Peer: 203.26.51.180:80
    Set-Cookie: NGUserID=cb1a33b7-24076-951014765-17; expires=Wednesday, 30-Dec-2037 16:00:00 GMT; path=/; domain=.com.au
    Set-Cookie: NGUserID=cb1a33b7-24076-951014765-18; expires=Wednesday, 30-Dec-2037 16:00:00 GMT; path=/; domain=.com.au
    Set-Cookie: NGUserID=cb1a33b7-24076-951014765-20; expires=Wednesday, 30-Dec-2037 16:00:00 GMT; path=/; domain=.com.au

    These cookies will then be echoed back to every single Austrialian .com domain! Forget about the US and NSA, what are these crazy Aussies up to?!! ;-)

    - Scott

    --

    You can't study the darkness by flooding it with light. --Edward Abbey

  134. Re:vichy french by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Vichy french were from the part of France which was sympathetic to Germany. They didn't want to be 'liberated'. But the northern French were very happy to see the Americans come rolling in.

  135. Re:NSA: world police or international robber ? by alfredo · · Score: 1

    Don't you think the French, and especially the Israelis are doing the same thing to us? It is the name of the game.

    Industrial espionage is pretty easy. businesses don't think of security very much.

    You get a job with or open a janitorial service, walk around the offices and just write down the passwords and such. they tape them to the monitor, Instead of putting them in a secure place. Nobody shreds. You can carry out sacks of info in black plastic bags. Files are not locked, it is a snap. Sometime the computers are on and ready and waiting for you to print out anything you want. They even supply blank floppies. Nice people.
    Knew an ex agent that owned a janitorial service.

    The NSA doesn't give a shit about you and what you do online, they aren't interested in and not allowed to spy domestically, it is the big fish they are after. They want to know what Airbus is doing, not what Hemos said yesterday. They do protect, but they also serve the business community by sharing info relative to their concerns.

    After a time in the field, considerations as to the moral questions, the patriotic aspects pale before the allure of the job. You do it because you can. It is the perfect job for the passive aggressive. NSA is a fine organization, staffed with normal everyday people, but it is those normal people who are doing th dirty work.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  136. �cran bleu mortel de Ti-Mou! by bbcat · · Score: 1

    It would be a better translation of the blue screen of death of Microsoft.

    Apparently there are more than 33k known bugs.

    As for the NSA being in Control of Microsoft and
    IBM, those French news people must be sniffing
    glue or flour.

    Just tune in to TV-5 sometimes and you'll find
    out that news in France is often a joke when
    they're talking about the US. Not to say that
    the brits are any better.

    I think they're kind of like the writers of the
    paper "Minuit" in Montréal. It's a paper like
    the US paper "Midnight" and the writers of said
    paper decide around a table what the news will be.
    It's cheaper that way than wasting their time
    outside considering that people wouldn't know the
    diffence anyway.

    Tabloids are funny sometimes until some morons
    think they're real news and report it on real
    newspaper or Radio and TV news.

  137. Serendipities by BoogieChillum · · Score: 1

    It's a shame. A crying shame.

    There could have been an AMIGA on every desktop
    instead of this lump of shite (boots box)

    Bet Gary was PISSED when he got back!

  138. MS and NSA conspiracy-The rest of the story... by Markar · · Score: 1

    What they forgot to mention was that the NSA arranged to fake Elvis Presley's death. They rushed Elvis to Area 51 where Elvis used his telepathic powers to communicate with the alien held there. The alien was a star spagetti coder on the planet it came from. Elvis relayed the information to Microsoft, of course there were Many Snafus in the translation; anyway that's how Microsoft got the code for its OS ;-) Lighten up and have a good day everyone :-)

    --
    "Open code, in other words, can be a check on state power." -Lawrence Lessig
  139. I know the US Government's morality first hand. by Perdo · · Score: 1
    This is a No Shitter,


    I was stationed at Camp Doha, Kuwait from June '97 to June '98 in the US ARMY. I was promoted to SGT after being there only a week. I was in 385th Signal Company. A normal tour for a signal soldier is one year in Kuwait. Camp Doha is a logistics center for all forces in Kuwait. Army Brigade task forces, composed of about 3000 men, are rotated through Kuwait for three months at a time. There are four rotations a year. The rotations overlap by about ten days to insure there is always a task force in Kuwait. A marine amphibious assault force is in Kuwait in December.


    Kuwaiti Liberation Day is February 22. Saddam usually gets surly about that time of year and 1998 was no exception. He kicked the UN inspectors out of Iraq and we had a stand off with him. We brought in another 8000 US Soldiers in to Kuwait then. Camp Doha is a big storage depot for equipment and ammunition. All the US has to do is send personnel to Kuwait and issue them the equipment that is already in place. We no longer have to execute a slow build up of forces. Camp Doha however can only support a brigade (about 32 tanks). Most of the new troops came from Ft Stewart. There were other indications of how serious it was. There were 7 Generals at Camp Doha including one from Australia and one from the UK, Navy SEALS, Army special forces and DELTA force present, Including two AC-130 Gunships. It was a regular dog and pony show.


    I was at Udari Range at this point providing secure telephone communications from the forward battle field commander to the Generals at Camp Doha. Udari range is 12km from the Iraqi border. Arriving with all these people was the Anthrax vaccine. Taking the vaccine was mandatory. I was in charge of 6 people. I was instructed to take my soldiers weapons away from them and put them under lock and key. We all had to go to the Mess tent to take our shots. Once there we were placed under MP guard and corralled into lines. We were told that the MPs would force anyone who resisted. I didn't see anyone resist. The shot burned really bad for about twenty minutes. The burning sort of crept up on you. One minute you would be laughing at your buddy cause he was crying about how bad it hurt the next you wouldn't be laughing any more. We were all sick for about 36 hours. The shot is injected into muscle. That muscle develops a golf ball sized lump or hardness in it that lasts a month. We repeated this 4 times before I left Kuwait.


    An anthrax vaccine was tested prior to the gulf war but was not used on soldiers during that conflict. I believe it caused actual anthrax in testing. We were given a different vaccine. When we took it there had never been any human trials. We were the guinea pigs at gunpoint. I heard that one soldier went into anyphlaxis shock. Sort of an allergy induced coma. Apparently she swelled up until her fingers looked like sausages. I believe that does account for the .007 percent reported harmfull side effects. That is rumor though. Now, only about 7,000 people received the vaccine. That means that probably 700 women received it based on the ratio of men to women. I wonder, since no pregnancy tests were done, how many of those women were pregnant. Normally new drug testing is done on a voluntary basis. A huge amount of money is paid to unemployed people generally and years of follow-ups are done. There have been no follow-ups to this vaccine. No one has ever given me a blood test to see if I have produced anthrax antibodies or have any lingering side effects.


    I suppose I could go on and on. The military has proven time and again that they care little for the patriots who serve in it. From nuclear testing with exposed troops, Agent Orange, gulf war syndrome to untested anthrax vaccinations the army proves they don't care a bit.


    Obviously the US Government is not above harming US Citizens. As for Microsoft I've said it before and I'll say it again: Bill Gates has enough money to buy 2 gigabytes of storage space for every man woman and child on the planet. All 6 billion of us. Windows is full of holes. Windows contains 65,535 ports. No one knows what they do. Is it a coincidence that the one corporation that could collect, store and use information on every single Windows OS user is also a monopoly and the single most powerful corporation in the world has ever seen. Motive, Means and Opportunity. We just need a body.


    Reading Microsoft's Windows source code would go a long way toward finding a body. Perhaps if Steve Gibson ever gets Project-X working we will have a body.


    The comment " we use the Windows API GetPrivateProfileString() in order to read configuration files" prompted me to read all my .cfg and any referenced .ini files. I honestly don't think there is anything Microsoft doesn't know about me. Time to set TweakUI to Paranoid until I can get Linux to work.


    Anyone feeling like I do, that you don't know anything until you have to teach it is welcome to the learning experience of giving me a hand starting linux. I am guessing you were all joking about black helicopters. I have seen them.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  140. French Intelligence, eh? by Guruzilla · · Score: 1

    Would this be the same French intelligence agencies that brought us the Maginot Line?

    HEE

    --
    -- "so let us not talk falsely now / the hour is getting late"
  141. give the man a cigar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now find 2 other ways to do it (I know of at least this many other solutions -- though nonoptimal).

    1. Re:give the man a cigar by khiron · · Score: 1
      >now find 2 other ways to do it

      other than ABC

      how about

      ACB, BCA, BAC, CAB and CBA. Sorry being faecetious. I'm curious what are the other 2 ways.

  142. Question by Dreamare · · Score: 1

    pardon my ignorance, but what does RTFM stand for? i never was good at acronyms... Dreamare

    1. Re:Question by jms · · Score: 2

      RTFM = Read The Manual

  143. If you are not breaking the law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You have nothing to worry about. Why are you Americans so paranoid ?

    dmg

  144. NSA = Fascism 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont you get it, NSA/CIA/FBI IS FASCISIM 2.0. It is a matter of public record that the FBI attempted to discredit the Black Panther Party and other progressives. They created a "Colouring Book" purporting to be by the Black Panthers in a successful attempt to portray BPP a negative hate group. Why was it sent to middle class white households. For the sake of everyone, except the establishment, GROW UP. PinochetMustDie (My Nick from now on as I am waiting for my password)

  145. retards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's unbelievable that, in these days, you cannot even get away from these unspeakably stupid patriot/racist techies on /.

    Americans, french, japanese, etc. ad infinitum... you're ALL alike. Instead of focusing on the subject, which, for a change, almost is interesting, you keep going on about how much the rest of the world suck and how many wars your country has won.

    For crying out loud, grow up!

    ... or at least have this discussion elsewhere. It must be obvious even to fascist retards, erhm.. intelligent and rational techies (I believe that's what you usually prefer to call yourself) of your kind that this discussion clearly does not belong here.