Slashdot Mirror


Linux on a Wrist Watch?

OnlyNou writes "IBM Develops Prototype of Wrist Watch Running Linux only a prototype, but it shows big blue has a lot of time on it's hands." The article is pretty vapourous: Its just a press release saying that they've done it. No pictures of linkage, so if anyone finds something informative, please post it. Update by HUNQ: Here is the picture of the watch, and it's DAMN CUTE! (credits goes to Linux Weekly News)

276 comments

  1. Re:"Excuse me, what time is it?" by British · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of an old SNL commercial in the 70s where they had an LED wristwatch. It took 4 buttons to be simultaneously pressed to see the time. It took 2 people to press all the buttons together.

  2. Quote by Dungeon+Dweller · · Score: 2

    Linux, which was developed by Finnish programmer Linus Torvalds, is used for many basic functions of Web sites, but is not yet considered mature enough for heavier business tasks.

    Who'd they get this quote from? Some kid in HS telling them how Linux is a 1337 hax0r OS?

    Cute article, mostly fluff. There are about 4 hard facts in it.

    1)Linux is an Operating System. Kinda like Windows, (GEE!)

    2)IBM put Linux on a wristwatch.

    3)Linux Torvalds has something to do with all of this.

    4)IBM isn't going to sell the watch, boo hoo.

    No offense to the author of the article, but WHERE DID YOU GET THAT QUOTE?

    How many supercomputers do you know run by NT? Which webserver has the highest marketshare? Is it IIS? Noo... Where do you come up with this stuff? Most computers are developed with some form of Unix, it might not be Linux, but certainly more people trust a Unix than trust NT. No offense, but I trust Linux WAYYY more than NT based on REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE.

    --
    Eh...
  3. Had to be said by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2
    Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these on your arm?

    Seriously, though - this reminds me of research at getting a network running through skin connectivity. Combine that with really small wearable processors, and you get to transmit files to your friends by shaking hands with them. The original implementation I remember was that you'd have a shoe that traded business cards with other people's shoes, by shaking hands. Crazy.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:Had to be said by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

      Seriously, though - this reminds me of research at getting a network running through skin connectivity. Combine that with really small wearable processors, and you get to transmit files to your friends by shaking hands with them. The original implementation I remember was that you'd have a shoe that traded business cards with other people's shoes, by shaking hands. Crazy.

      Eek. Imagine the kinda viruses that this could cause.

      DON'T TOUCH ANYONE! Your computers will get infected!

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

  4. Re:Why? by orabidoo · · Score: 2
    Because maybe if you had the money you'd want to get a watch that'll present yourself in a somewhat half-assed way.
    I do have the money, and I don't want a watch to "present me". In fact, when I wear a watch (which is rare enough), I wear it in my pocket. Anyway, my point is that there's a large range of "personal presentation" options that involve neither dirty "C DOS RUN" t-shirts, nor PHB-style personal paraphernalia. One of the things that piss me off the most about these kinds of debates is that people tend to see these things in a linear scale, from "dorky" to "glamorous", and are all excited either about defending either direction, or on finding the oh-so-difficult middle point. I say bullshit. There's many more options than that; there's not just an up and a down, but a front and back, left and right, and it's perfectly possible to have a personal style that looks like you give more than a crap about yourself, without buying into the name-brand clothes and goldwatch crap.

    as for my work, I actually work for an internet company that has already realized that Linux and Free Software are good things, and where management actually cares more about what you have to say than about what your watch is made of. if yours doesn't, hey, we're hiring =)

    Just don't be angry when I'm your boss in a week. =)
    as long as I get to do cool stuff, I won't =)
  5. Re:Why? by The+Welcome+Rain · · Score: 1

    That's nice, but pure research is only useful when the results are released. If IBM had to do interesting things to the kernel to get it to scale down to this extent (and I'll bet they did), they should release the changes if this research is to be anything but a waste of time.

    --

    --
    Some keywords for the NSA in the Lord of the Rings universe: One Ring bind find Sauron quest Nazgul freedom
  6. But.... by aclaudet · · Score: 1


    ...will it have an integrated MP3 player?

  7. Re:Microsoft Time by freebe · · Score: 1

    Remember the big protest because they were going to put up a satellite transmitting on OSCAR (or was it AMSAT?) frequencies? It sort of died after that (good riddance).

    --

    Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

  8. Am I missing something? by Hawkins · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the average human have space enough for three or more watches? Why limit ourselves to watches that only do useful things like tell time? Accessorize!

  9. Re:Super by mr · · Score: 1

    >The Data Link is Windows only, and in the two years I have been using NT4 and W2K, my rig has been rock stable

    You have not read the licence. The watch is only licenced for use with Win 3.1, WfW, and Windows 95.

    --
    If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
  10. Re:I HAVE A DATALINK WATCH! by Kinthelt · · Score: 1
    the best watch I've ever had w/ 5 alarms

    I thought the 5 alarms was a small bonus compared to the 150 phone numbers!!! Not to mention the appointment beeper, the to-do list and birthday reminder. It's personally saved my a$$ numerous times. I really don't care that it's made by Mircosoft, 'cause it's actually a *GOOD* product! I guess I also enjoy the bragging rights at geek parties that I've got the heavier wristwatch. :)

    --

    "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

  11. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by Jonathan · · Score: 3

    I have not worn a watch since about 1989, and I have never been in a situation where I wished I had one. The need for a timepiece on your wrist is a complete illusion.

    I can only assume you never ride public buses.

  12. Re:SMART! Go IBM! by Upsilon · · Score: 1
    Anyone remember the Timex Data-Link watch?

    I not only remember it, I'm wearing one right now! It's useful, really! Sure, I've lost the software to actually program it and I've never really used it for anything even when I had the software, but there's nothing quite like holding your watch up to your computer screen to program it with a bunch of flashing lines. Try it. It will change your life.

    --
    I am not an idiot. Please use my name to email me.

    "That's right, I'm quoting myself."

    -Upsilon

  13. Re:Oh the many many uses! by Meech · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this watch in Knight Rider?

  14. Re:Why? by Garpenlov · · Score: 1

    Or are you going to sit and admire it, and then go out and get a real watch, a gold watch that actually conveys status and meaning to the rest of society?

    Well, I thought a watch was for you to know what time it was. Apparently I was mistaken. So, given that I have now been educated that the purpose of a watch is to convey status and meaning to the rest of society, the point of this watch is even clearer. It's just as much a status symbol as a cell phone, PDA, laptop, etc. "My watch runs Linux, what does yours run?"

    Now, if we for some reason want to want to think of a watch as a functional device, as opposed to a status symbol, the advantages of putting linux on a watch are obvious. The code that runs watches previous to this was designed to...run a watch. Whereas linux running on a watch is a general-purpose OS adapted to run on a watch. Which means it can easily be extended to create all sorts of futuristic wrist-devices, i.e. phones, remote-controls, etc.

    --
    --- Where's my X.400 protocol decoder?
  15. bah, nonsense by NightHwk · · Score: 1
    They should open source the design of the watch (and the kernel as well, which would already be required under the GPL) so people can hack together their own linux watches.

    NightHawk

    Tyranny =Gov. choosing how much power to give the People.

    --

    1. Re:bah, nonsense by jafuser · · Score: 1
      They should open source the design of the watch (and the kernel as well, which would already be required under the GPL)

      Isn't that true only if they make a commercial version for sale? (In case you didn't read the article OR the parent post that you replied to, IBM doesn't plan to manufacture these watches)

      If that were the case, then my personal tinkering around with GPL'ed source code would constantly require me to distribute the source to my work, even if I never give the program to anyone else...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  16. Shouldn't it be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't it be "IBM has too much time on it's wrist"?

  17. A major fashion NoNo by Dungeon+Dweller · · Score: 2

    I, personally love the watch, it would go well on my exgf and match her cute glasses, but I would picture the production model with either a chrome or gold finish, or removable plates. Perhaps iMac colors, which are strangely fashionable (nobody conservative would have thought in the 80s, now they would all wear one).

    --
    Eh...
  18. Flying by craw · · Score: 3
    Well this will cause a problem when I travel. But this device would be a great retirement gift.

    Please turn off all electronic devices until 10 minutes after takeoff.

  19. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by Golias · · Score: 5
    Admittedly it's not hard to tell the time on an analog watch, but those few milliseconds more it takes, multiplied by the thousands of times you look at your watch, is a significant productivity hit.

    Some of us have realized that it is even more productive to not wear a watch at all. Why carry a clock with you everywhere you go when there are clocks everywhere, and you are surrounded by people who wear them as fashion statements.

    By not wearing a watch, I actually manage my time better, and I have no temptation to glipse at the time over and over when I am anxious.

    I have not worn a watch since about 1989, and I have never been in a situation where I wished I had one. The need for a timepiece on your wrist is a complete illusion.

    Watches are shackles, dude. Loose it and you will be happier.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  20. Why? by freebe · · Score: 1

    My question is: What is the point? If you think about it, Linux is just a piece of computer code (esp. on a device like this). What functionality is the computer code adding to this wristwatch? Nothing over a RTOS, that's what I can tell you. It's just a hunk of computer code that does absolutely nothing without something to run in it - and what are you going to run? MPG123 on a watch? Are you going to practice Bash shell scripting while you're out? Or are you going to sit and admire it, and then go out and get a real watch, a gold watch that actually conveys status and meaning to the rest of society?

    --

    Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

    1. Re:Why? by sethgecko · · Score: 1
      That's nice, but pure research is only useful when the results are released

      Umm... I'm sure the results were useful to IBM. Just because they didn't release them to you and they aren't useful to you doesn't mean they aren't useful.

      OTOH, I agree they should release the results.

      --
      Be ot or bot ne ot, taht is the nestquoi.
    2. Re:Why? by saider · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice that which can satisfactorily be explained by incompetence -- N. Bonaparte

      I never heard that quote come from Napolean. I understood that it came from Robert A. Heinlein's "Logic of Empire" in which a character quoth "You have attributed conditions to villainy that simply result from stupidity." I would be curious to see if this is taken from an older quote. Do you have any references?



      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    3. Re:Why? by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 4
      What's wrong with research without a practical application?

      This is EXACTLY the point.
      Too many companies only do projects to have a product at the end. And then they complain that they are behind or dont have the training to do some other practical project.

      Historically the most used inventions were made by mistake. How does anyone expect to create something REALLY good when the outcome is already set in stone.

    4. Re:Why? by scribblej · · Score: 1
      Well, if you check the last few paragraphs of the article, you'll see that the author claims Linux is used primarily for Websites, but not for much else. This is supposed to be an attempt to show that Linux can handle "More powerful applications."

      Now I ask, who considers their wristwatch to be a more powerful application than your average webserver? Maybe IIS, but not Apache, not Linux, not us!

      ;)

    5. Re:Why? by jmccay · · Score: 1

      According to the article on their site. They did it to prove Linux was scaleable. ABCNews has a picture on it's web site. I would buy it.

      IBM goes into better detail on their web site. It has 8M Flash memory, 8M DRAM, a wheel (for getting around), touch screen, and both IR and RF wireless connectivity. Also, it is designed to connect to PCs, cell phones and other wireless-enabled devices. It can view condensed email and pager like messages. It will provide users with calender, to-do list, and an address book, I don't think these are done yet. They plan on doing more with it.

      Asside for the "look what we can do" part of it, I think they chose linux because of its open source status, and to add to their list of thing they are doing to promote Linux. The open source might allow you to customise your own watch. :) I would definately by it.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    6. Re:Why? by darkphyber · · Score: 1

      Remember when, back in the late 80's, Sony created the TV Watch? It was also a "proof-of-concept" device. The purpose wasn't to get everyone to start watching TV on their wrists. (besides which, who really wants to squint at a one-inch B&W screen anyhow?) The purpose was to show-off what Sony's engineers were capable of. The thing actually works and is now part of the Smithsonian's American History Museum in Washington, D.C.

    7. Re:Why? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      I know why - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these. Hey, that actually might work! Of course, your arms might look silly with 38 identical watches.

    8. Re:Why? by dublin · · Score: 2

      Funny how snobbish "geeks" can be against things purely because of their preconceived notions about them.

      I love a nice quality mechanical watch (and the good ones generally come in gold cases, which are not the expensive part of the watch!). That's not because I'm trying to impress anyone (I'm not), but because I'm a mech hacker, too, and I appreciate the elegance of a really nice mechanical hack like that required to do a nice watch.

      Have a look at the Jeager-LeCoultre Reversos with hands on both sides (keeping in mind that the hands on the opposite side must run "backwards") and tell me that's not a neat hack - remember, there are a *lot* of great hacks going on outside computers - some of which are at least 2000 years old. (Look up "Antikythera Mechanism" on your favorite search engine for the oldest documented hack of this kind.)

      That said, I don't wear a gold Swiss watch every day, in fact, at the moment, I have on a nigh indestructible Timex Indiglo analog watch, which takes with aplomb the daily thrashing I give it without undue concern for scratches, water, and the like. (I do have to say that I despise digital watches with a passion: analog is better, and mech analog better still: after all, seconds aren't atomic, so watches *should* have true sweep-second hands rather than the ridiculous goose-stepping horrors the Japanese have foisted on us...)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    9. Re:Why? by orabidoo · · Score: 1
      That's not because I'm trying to impress anyone (I'm not), but because I'm a mech hacker, too, and I appreciate the elegance of a really nice mechanical hack like that required to do a nice watch.
      contratulations, you're one of the very few people I know who actually appreciate watches for the mechanical works that they are. but please don't expect everyone else ot care about that aspect of them! anyway, I sure didn't imply to lump you together with the people who buy them "to convey status", like the other post said.

      so watches *should* have true sweep-second hands rather than the ridiculous goose-stepping horrors the Japanese have foisted on us...)
      now, who was talking about snobbishness? ;-) to most of us a watch is just a way to know the current time, and from *that* perspective, digital works just fine, cheaper and less fragile.
    10. Re:Why? by sniggly · · Score: 1
      I wont be surprised that when you go behind the scenes at IBM to look at the people who build linux into a watch and stash 20.000 linux instance into the large servers you'll find gear heads wearing black death metal shirts saying "hey thats cool dude" and "lets build a mobile beowulf cluster out of these watches".

      Maybe not to those extremes but if you want to keep the creative programming and computer talent indoors nowadays you have to give them a lot of leeway, allow them their style, allow them their quirks. And I guess in case of IBM allow them to put their weird ideas to practise, give them a budget and silently wonder what in fact they are really doing. Give a gold watch and a suit to your sales people who can sell the gadgets the gear heads will eventually develop.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    11. Re:Why? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Things seem pretty foggy, but I would guess that this is pretty much a proof of concept kind of thing. Rather like writing the letters IBM with a scanning-tunneling electromicroscope (since they started moving atoms with the beast, do they still call it a microscope?). IBM's done several impressive "proof of concept" pieces that were rather useless practically. Consider it an etude.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:Why? by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      As of right now, it serves very little purpose. But just imagine X running on your wrist!

    13. Re:Why? by jdw27_42 · · Score: 1
      Now, if we for some reason want to want to think of a watch as a functional device, as opposed to a status symbol, the advantages of putting linux on a watch are obvious. The code that runs watches previous to this was designed to...run a watch. Whereas linux running on a watch is a general-purpose OS adapted to run on a watch. Which means it can easily be extended to create all sorts of futuristic wrist-devices, i.e. phones, remote-controls, etc.
      Remember Windows CE? That was a general-purpose OS adapted to run on a palm-size device. It got blown out of the water by Palm, not just because they were first, but because most people didn't want that extra functionality / complications. (Mind you, I got a Cassiopeia A-10 within about the first week it was sold, and have enjoyed it since, except while waiting to get it repaired.)
      --
      ++JohnWheeler
    14. Re:Why? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      Though I agree with you about getting a real watch to show status (I have little status, I have a stainless steel analog watch), this could be useful for limited applications. Remember those little calculator/address book/watches of a few years back? This is just an extention of that. And I think that it would be very useful to have some real OS code on a watch/pda, such as an MP3 player so I can chuck my walkman, or being able to see if I got that email I was waiting for.

      Plus, I think it would be cool for use with Seti@Home

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    15. Re:Why? by soup · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's a proof of concept, but think:

      IBM can claim to support Linux along a HUGE spectrum of hardware- from the Teeny wristwatch all the way up to their BFI (Big Iron).

      The bragging rights have gotta be worth something, too, when trying to embarass the guys w/ NT (or W2K)...
      "Nyah, Nyah! You can't get this small, can you now?"

      "Hey! No wonder I can't have a mid-life crisis!
      Having a Life is a pre-requisite!"

      --
      -soup (GNUrd, Speaker to Machines) "Laugh at yourself- Why should everyone else have all the fun?" -Romanchek's 6th Ru
    16. Re:Why? by LMacG · · Score: 1

      Your question is answered in the article. It's not meant to be a commercial venture, but it is a "proof of concept" exercise -- "This is just research prototype," said Takako Yamakura. "Some say Linux cannot be scaled down. This is just to show Linux is capable of doing this." said.

      What's wrong with research without a practical application? I've written programs just to see what I could do with the tools at hand. Those programs might not have gone into production, but I've know I've learned something each time.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    17. Re:Why? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      According to an article at Wired it seems as though they did this to prove that it could be done. IBM is trying to show that Linux is by far the best operating system for an assortment of all kinds of devices, that can easily tweaked to suit the needs of the industry. Many said that Linux could not be scaled down this far...they are just showing that Linux is da bomb in scalability.

      You are a unique individual, just like everyone else.

      --
      Sig it.
    18. Re:Why? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Seems like a logical step toward joining the Borg ;-)

      I commute California's notorious 17 and see enough boogerheads yakking it up on cell phones. I imagine some drivers are using Palms (or derivitive varation) as they drive. I can just imagine them trying to surf the web on their watch, next, or perform some sysadmin functions via cellular modem.

      One step forward for mobile technology, one lurch backward for the commute.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    19. Re:Why? by orabidoo · · Score: 2
      Or are you going to sit and admire it, and then go out and get a real watch, a gold watch that actually conveys status and meaning to the rest of society?

      are you kidding? why would I want to spend my $$ on a GOLD WATCH of all things? of all the things I could do with my attention, time and money, choosing a watch that "conveys status and meaning to the rest of society" ranks pretty damn near the bottom.

      $5 casio (or no brand) watches are the best. you can buy a whole box of them, and take the next one when yours goes in the washing machine or falls behind the bed or whatever.

    20. Re:Why? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      It was a joke, just thrown in there to be silly. Would I honestly expect a seti@home client to be put into a wristwatch, maybe by some mad fiend somewhere, but not by anyone expecting some serious work.

      Now, a DES cracking client...

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    21. Re:Why? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I understood it as a joke: don't worry :-)
      I just found it funny to actually imagine the consequences. Yes I have a weird sense of humour ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    22. Re:Why? by Kailden · · Score: 1

      How do you get the data on your watch? (IR?)

      I could be wrong, but I seem to remember a watch that came with software you loaded to your computer. You could set up your schedule/alarms/address book with the computer program, then tell it to send the data to the watch. You then held the watch up to the monitor, which would blink from black to white a billion times to program the watch.

      The linux watch idea may not be useful now, but give it a few years, Mr. Bond.

      --
      I need a TiVo for my car. Pause live traffic now.
    23. Re:Why? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Plus, I think it would be cool for use with Seti@Home

      I agree, that would be cool....but did you think about the implications:

      • Where do you store the (huge amount) data. I bet such a thing won't have 2Megs of RAM.
      • How do you get the data on your watch? (IR?)
      • How does the watch tell you number crunching is done and needs new data to crunch? (Not to forget the data it has to send to seti@home)
      • How do you start/stop the jobs: if won't come with a fully functional keyboard. Would you ssh to it via the IR link?
      • Will it show the fancy graphics Seti@Home makes ;-)
      Not to break down a nice geek-toy, but it has little or no use at all...It's just nice to show (brag) it can be done. Besides, I don't even wear a watch anymore: I'm always in vicinity of computers and those always have a time-indicator anway.
      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    24. Re:Why? by evan1l38 · · Score: 1
      Speaking as someone who uses and loves a Timex Datalink, you can do a whole lot in a watch besides tell time. Don't limit what my watch can do just because you don't have the foresight to imagine it. Right now I keep phone numbers, appointments, and reminders in my watch. It interfaces with my computer to get them so I can enter them easily. That means there has to be some sort of OS running in the watch. Add to that the Timex watch that has a built in pager or the built in telephone, and you can see that there could be a lot of uses for the thing on your wrist besides telling time.

      Evan Reynolds evanthx@hotmail.com

      --

      Evan Reynolds evanthx@hotmail.com
      Two peanuts crossed the street. One was assaulted.

    25. Re:Why? by american_bongo · · Score: 1

      are you kidding? why would I want to spend my $$ on a GOLD WATCH of all things? of all the things I could do with my attention, time and money, choosing a watch that "conveys status and meaning to the rest of society" ranks pretty damn near the bottom.

      $5 casio (or no brand) watches are the best. you can buy a whole box of them, and take the next one when yours goes in the washing machine or falls behind the bed or whatever.


      Because maybe if you had the money you'd want to get a watch that'll present yourself in a somewhat half-assed way. Say you try to talk to your upper-management, and let me assume that based on your poindexter-digital-watch fanatacism, that you also dress like a typical slovengly dork - a pair of 45 size jeans and a C DOS RUN shirt. You want to get your business to convert to Linux let's say, but the first thing that pops out of their mouth is "you work here, and you dress like that?" As much as you might like "people dont judge you by what you look, they judge you by what you say and do!", the only thing they can think is "how did this funny-dressed kid get a job here?" Of course after they reject your q00ky notion, they pester you about why you dress like you were out of the latest 2600. Ok I'm done, get my point? Some of us want a watch that makes it appear like we give a crap about ourselves and the image that conveys profesionalism, but go ahead and dress and act like you want. Just don't be angry when I'm your boss in a week. =)

    26. Re:Why? by Vincent+Bernat · · Score: 1

      This watch was done with Microsoft.

    27. Re:Why? by Johnny00 · · Score: 1
      The watch is the Timex Datalink, which you can get more info about here

      I've owned 2 of them and it works quite well (cept that I use WIN2K at work and they don't mix) with CRT screens or a notebook adapter that costs more than I'm willing to spend. It's handy for those of us cheap skates without cellphones or pagers or PDAs.

      --
      I live life on the edge ... of my desk.
  21. Re:No, it hasn't. by freebe · · Score: 1

    Obviously you missed the point. Kurzwiel is a respected futurist, and the work wasn't sci-fi - it was a futurist's predictions for the future. And Kurzwiel is one amazing fellow - he hasn't been wrong yet. I trust his vision here.

    --

    Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

  22. Oh dear.. by Xerithane · · Score: 5

    Casual Passerby: "Do you know what time it is?"
    Person wearing Linux Watch: "Absolutely not, but I run linux on it."

    nerdfarm.org

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    1. Re:Oh dear.. by Skeezix · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the real advantage is that no one will have to actually ask you what time it is. They can just ssh into your watch to find out what time it is.
      ----

    2. Re:Oh dear.. by Mr.+Adequate · · Score: 1
      Yes, from now on until forever, August 7 will be Small Linux Day.

      Other Slashdot artticles you may see today...

      • Linux In A Shotglass
      • Linux On An Amoeba
      • How Many Penguins Can Dance On The Head Of A Pin?
      • 1-Bit Linux


    3. Re:Oh dear.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Probably because it's almost LinuxWorld time (965666203) over at the San Jose Convention Center.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Oh dear.. by codemonkey_uk · · Score: 3
      Casual Passerby: "Do you know what time it is?"
      Person wearing Linux Watch: "Yeah, just a sec, I need to log on ... um, yeah, hang on, its ... sixty six minutes past six ... oh ... arse, I've been 0wN3d..."

      I'll use it to time hot long it takes me to tot up my phone bill on my HP Linux calculator!

      Thad

      --

      Thad

    5. Re:Oh dear.. by titus-g · · Score: 1

      Casual Passerby: "Do you know what time it is?"
      Person wearing Linux Watch: "Sure, it's just coming up on 965661259"

      What's with all these (recent) slashdot topics? is it small linux day and no one told me?

      --

      ~ppppppppö

  23. Looks thick by droleary · · Score: 1

    It might be a trick of the lighting, but the damn thing looks like it's an inch thick. It shouldn't be a watch, it should be a belt buckle!

    1. Re:Looks thick by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      That's no trick of the lighting. The real fun bit is they went to all the trouble of constructing a 6 foot long pen for this photo.

  24. Super by Foogle · · Score: 3
    Super, Great, Fantastic. Now my wrist-watch won't crash anymore. Oh, wait -- My wrist-watch doesn't crash anyway because, like the majority of watch-wearing people on this planet, I don't wear a digital watch.

    Digital watches have never been fashionable -- I don't think wrist-computers are going to take-off any time in the near (or not-so-near) future.

    -----------

    "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

    1. Re:Super by anotherone · · Score: 1

      I got rid of the microsoft logo on my Datalink with a Sharpie.

      -----

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    2. Re:Super by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      On my father's retirement from Dow, after 38 years. He received a gold TI LED watch. Batteries don't last terribly long, but the bezel is gold. Quite the novelty.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Super by bjrubble · · Score: 1

      I would *love* to have a programmable watch. I'm a big fan of the Databank watches (it's the only way I'll remember anything) but I'm still using one of the fairly simple ones (Casio DBC-150) because the really cool ones have *terrible* design features. Like, you can store 400 numbers, but each one only gets a 6 character identifier. Or, it has 6 alarms, but no repeating countdown timer. I've found that watch makers have close to zero understanding of how people (or I, at least) want to use their products. Putting the capabilities into software means (hopefully) getting a watch that works the way I want it to.

    4. Re:Super by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1

      It's not the display part that could make it crash, so a digital watch is no more crash-prone than an electronic watch with an analog face. And almost all the watches you see are actually electronic inside. Some aren't, but I wouldn't say that the majority of watch wearers have rolexes.

    5. Re:Super by jwonase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what is the point of having your reminders and such on a watch if you can't link-up with your PC? Wait a minute, what if some company was to put maybe Linux on the watch with the ability to Link-up with your PC. Hmm... Neat idea. I'm glad I thought of it.

    6. Re:Super by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I've found that watch makers have close to zero understanding of how people (or I, at least) want to use their products. Putting the capabilities into software means (hopefully) getting a watch that works the way I want it to.
      And, trajically, if something of this ilk comes out it will feature WindowsCE, have some awful method of input or in some other miss-the-target-by-a-mile, totally be elusive to you, bungle it and release some overpriced, overhyped piece of crap. If you want anything done right, do it yourself...

      BTW if you see a guy walking around in public with a Sun Sparc duct-taped to his arm, that's me.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Super by Tet · · Score: 2
      Digital watches have never been fashionable

      True, but then neither have I. Perhaps that's why I've worn a digital watch since 1978 or so. But seriously, what has fashion got to do with anything? While I can't really see the day when I start coding (or even playing) Quake 7 on my wristwatch, I can forsee a time when it plays me music, schedules appointments etc.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    8. Re:Super by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > Digital watches have never been fashionable

      Actually, I think that they are a pretty neat idea.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:Super by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

      Digital watches have never been fashionable...

      Whereas everyone waits with bated breath for the unveiling of the new spring line of analog watches.
      --

      --
      Linux MAPI Server!
      http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
      (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    10. Re:Super by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1
      > Digital watches have never been fashionable

      Actually, I think that they are a pretty neat idea.

      Man. You are so amazingly primitive.
      ___

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    11. Re:Super by Hitch · · Score: 1

      wait...you're from the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the galaxy, aren't you?
      -------------------------------------------- --
      All that glitters has a high refractive index.

      --
      You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
      http://propheteer.org
    12. Re:Super by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      Well, you can already get some pretty sophisticated watches, but the only real benefits I can see is in programming/configuring it for peripherals, such as:

      Propeller Beanie anonometer

      Pacemaker biofeedback

      Insulin monitor

      Blood alcohol monitor

      Caffiene monitor

      Dick Tracy Two-way wrist computer(tm)

      Secret Decoder

      Pressure sensor

      Depth guage

      Dive monitor

      Slashdot reading while being shaked down for your lunch money

      Photo-editting (with Gimp) of images scanned in via your Borg-Cam

      Electronic Thumb
      and then it may result in a lot of unemployed Babel fish... Need bait?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    13. Re:Super by Segfault+11 · · Score: 1
      I dunno -- I have a Timex DataLink watch, and it really kicks ass. It stores phone numbers, appointments, and anniversaries that can be configured to give audible and visual reminders!

      Despite having a "Microsoft Windows Compatible" logo on it, my original watch managed not to crash until it accidentally flew a couple dozen yards in front of me, then found the side of a cliff. Spare us the "Windows crashes all the time, Linux does not" mantra, too. The Data Link is Windows only, and in the two years I have been using NT4 and W2K, my rig has been rock stable.

      Anyway, there are people like ME are interested in wristwatch computers. We don't want the bulk and maintenance of Palms, not to mention their expense. Maybe Linux is not doing anything spectacular on a wrist watch right now, but down the road, I think it would be very intersting to have a watch with retinal projection and virtual keyboard capabilities. It would certainly beat using Grafitti.

      --

      I registered my hate for Jon Katz

    14. Re:Super by Mathetes · · Score: 1

      I've been wearing my Datalink for about 4 years. In looking at Linux wristwatches (to get rid of that Microsoft logo on my wrist!), I think I've decided that I'd really rather just have a watch that gives me time, really really accurate time!

  25. Frankly my dear, I give a damm. by cardoso · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty tired of the "geek for geeks" Linux attitude. WHO CARES if they put Linux on an Alien anal probe?

    I really believe they should use all that expertise to put Linux running where it matters:

    In Grandma's PC.

    Easy, friendly, and, above all, forgiving. People don't have the right to make mistakes under Linux. It is wrong. It's a pitty (sp?) nobody is doing hard research to make it friendlier. (sp?). It's not enough to be good, one must be gentle.

    Linux will NOT take the world running on watches, refrigerators, toasters or dildos.

    --

    []'s Carlos Cardoso - Becoming a brazilian ProBlogger, typo by typo
  26. Re:Microsoft Time by AugstWest · · Score: 2

    This is true, but they were right with the bullet "Everything you do will be more fun!"

    Now I even enjoy scooping the cat litter.

    Thanks again, Windows.

  27. another one that bugs me... by Uberminky · · Score: 1
    I hate it when people say "alot". As in, "I like Linux alot." GAHHH there's no such word as "alot"! (And nobody say anything about the fact that I put punctuation outside my quotes, I'm a coder, I can't help it!!! [And anyway, isn't that what they do in England? SO PBTHBTPBTBT!!!])

    ;-)

    --

    The streets shall flow with the blood of the Guberminky.

  28. Oh yeah? by AugstWest · · Score: 2

    Well, I've got a watch with a minute hand, millenium hand and an eon hand.

    And when they meet, it's a happy land.

    Powerful man....

  29. Beowulf watch by mmaddox · · Score: 2


    Personally, I'm surprised that no one has mentioned this.

    Of course, you could then move to your other arm, your legs, pocketwatches, your penis...whatever. Imagine your computing power.

    --

    What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

  30. Hip & Powerful... by GeekLife.com · · Score: 2

    Get a Beowulf cluster of these and we can be as cool as Ricky Schroeder with his arm full of swatches.
    -----

  31. I HAVE A DATALINK WATCH! by Da+w00t · · Score: 1

    Da**it! I have the model 150 on my wrist right now. it's the best watch I've ever had w/ 5 alarms. that and I love telling people I download programs to my watch. The only problem is this word in gold lettering at the bottom...

    da w00t.

    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
    1. Re:I HAVE A DATALINK WATCH! by Nexx · · Score: 1

      I really don't care that it's made by Microsoft, 'cause it's actually a *GOOD* product!

      That remark kind of takes me back to 1995, when the Microsoft Natural Keyboard[0] saved my wrists, but my laptop ran Slackware 2.0 Linux. My (geek) friends would come to my dorm and would leave with their heads shaking sideways. M$ seemed (at the time) to at least be able to make decent hardware, but not necessarily in the OS department[1]. Anyone else find that ironic?

      [0] Which, mind you, is still in use and is credited with saving my wrists from CTS.
      [1]Bugger the original Win 95, not to mention the Win 3.1x. They were all pretty horrid, except for DOS[2]
      [2]DOS 6.22 worked nicely on the laptop. It was just a matter of getting the bloody thing to recognise the PCMCIA 3Com ethernet card that was a PITA[3]
      [3]Which, mind you, the Linux distro did nicely when I installed it. I think the sequence on Linux was: boot, install, reboot, ping, be amazed.


      --
  32. Analog watches rock! by SatelliteBoy · · Score: 3
    Ah, but can you find true North with a digital watch?

    Seriously, all analog watches can be used as sun compasses. It's a couple of steps, but an interesting trick:

    First, hold the watch horizontal. Then, hold something thin over the center of the watch, making a sundial-like shadow. Line this shadow up with 12:00. Now, true North is half way between the hour hand and the shadow. You do need, however, to correct for daylight savings and have the correct time.

    Of course, there's always the GPS watch...

    1. Re:Analog watches rock! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      All of that and more...

      Digital compass
      &nbspMeasures and displays the direction in 16
      &nbspdirections
      &nbspMeasuring range: 0 to 359 degrees
      &nbspMeasuring unit: 1 degree

      Plus a barometer, altimeter....

      Link to the casio watch that does all this

    2. Re:Analog watches rock! by look · · Score: 1

      Does this work under florescent light? :)

    3. Re:Analog watches rock! by Jason+Argo · · Score: 1
      Unless you're in the southern hemisphere, in which case you'd line up the shadow with 6:00.

      I've used this a few times when I've been walkabout riding my Kangaroo. ;)

  33. Re:SMART! Go IBM! by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

    I love my datalink. The original Model 70.

    The thing is waterproof, shockproof, and works without delays. I sync it to atomic clock once a month.
    --
    Leonid S. Knyshov

    --
    Leonid S. Knyshov
    Find me on Quora :)
  34. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by ichimunki · · Score: 1

    since when do printed bus schedule times and the actual arrival of the bus actually coincide?

    --
    I do not have a signature
  35. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by quietlysubversive · · Score: 1

    True enough... I haven't used a watch in ~7 years. There is, however, one situation in which a watch is very convenient: Testing.

    Admittedly, a watch might distract you a little during a test, but many is the time I have sorely desired the knowledge of whether I had time to erase what I had written, in order to correct a minor mistake.

    Other than that, about all a watch does for you is give you a weird white spot on your arm (if you are lucky enough to get outside, that is :-)

    --
    ----(o)----
  36. Re:SMART! Go IBM! by swdunlop · · Score: 1

    Sounds like my foolish datamemo watch.. I bought it, so I could read the numbers without my glasses, and never did quite figure out what to do with the memory function.

    Probably has something to do with the fact that I don't really touch phones anymore.

  37. What I want to know is... by Phroggy · · Score: 2
    ...does it run xntpd?

    --

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  38. Re:Microsoft Time by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    This Microsoft time must be why all their products are delivered late and unfinished. Probably also why they slow down a perfectly fine computer.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  39. Re:Is everyone jealous??? by Benwick · · Score: 2

    I've actually had the privilege to work in IBM research in Yorktown NY. It's the greatest place to work in the world. All because they have Lego Mindstorm! Certainly the largest collection of geniuses west of MIT and east of Palo Alto. (All geniuses love Legos.)

  40. Re:Been there, done that by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Is this a hoax? If not, I want my flying-car-in-a-briefcase.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  41. Re:SMART! Go IBM! by anotherone · · Score: 1

    You can find the software here

    -----

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  42. Don't need a watch by Kryptonomic · · Score: 1
    I hear you.

    I haven't worn a watch since my high school days, which is now about 10 years ago, and I'm doing just fine.

    Too bad I had to learn to use a calendar, though. I didn't really forget appointments or deadlines, but not writing them down gave me the leeway to postpone action until the very last minute. Result: poorly planned meetings and messy reports.

  43. Re:Oh the many many uses! by Devil+Ducky · · Score: 2

    >Journaling Filesystem: If my watch goes down, I won't lose my other timezone settings.

    That implies that IBM is going to finish the port of JFS to linux so that they can put it on their watch... yeah, that makes sense.

    Devil Ducky

    --

    Devil Ducky
    MY peers would get out of jury duty.
  44. i agree! no summertime trouble anymore by TA · · Score: 1

    It's always been super-annoying that the braindead wristwatches don't know anything abut leap years, summertime and so on. Why can't the stupid thing handle that itself, just like all computers do? (at least those with /usr/share/timezone).
    That by itself is enough for me to want to run Linux (or *BSD) on the wristwatch. I'm fed up of that damn braindead Casio digital watch I have.
    TA

  45. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by drivers · · Score: 1

    "Hey buddy, what time you got?"

    A: Time to buy a watch. :)

  46. Re:Been there, done that by jallen02 · · Score: 1

    Just wait for some crazy MechE student's to get bored enough.

    :-P


    If you think education is expensive, try ignornace

  47. LAMERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Linux in a box!" "Linux on a wristwatch!" What next...? "Linux on your pap smear!" "Linux in your mom's underwear drawer!" "Linux in your rectum!" "Linux on the earlobe of a midget!" Who the fuck cares? Get a life people

  48. That answers the interface questions by _xeno_ · · Score: 2
    According to All Linux Devices, the interface is a combination of a touch-sensitive screen and the rolling wheel. It apparently runs Linux 2.2 as the kernel (although the sheet says "OS"), along with some form of X server (X11 R6). Apparently they hope to up the resolution of the device, allowing it to be used to surf the internet. It has 8 MB of flash memory, and 8 MB ram. This is actually fairly impressive for a watch.

    Although I think that using "a combination of the rolling wheel and touch sensitive screen" to interface with the watch is just a little too annoying. Can you imaging writing anything with that? It's already annoying enough to set normal watchs, can you imaging rotating in the new date after the battery dies?

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  49. Re:Microsoft Time by FreeUser · · Score: 3

    In 1960s the french actually tried decimal time :)

    It was a good idea, unfortunately it never caught on (of course, here in the US the entire metric system 'never caught on' despite being our official standard for decades now).

    I wrote an amusing java applet which is viewable on my homepage, which impliments a kind of "metric time."

    10 hours / day, 100 minutes /hour, 100 seconds /minute, e.g. 5:00:00 is 12:00 noon

    Actually, it would make more sense in terms of nomenclature to have 1000 seconds / minute, such
    that one has hours (decirotations), minutes (millirotations), and seconds (microrotations), e.g. 7:50:000 would be 6:00 PM.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  50. What would make this super-cool... by cthlptlk · · Score: 1

    ...would be lots and lots of public KVM kiosks that would let us use the watches (and other portables) in a ergonomic and wireless kinda way. I would even vote for <insert objectionable political candidate here> to see such a thing.

  51. sounds good but by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    i) does it have a battery backed clock?
    ii) will it tell the correct time after 2038?
    iii) how much pr0n can I fit on it?

  52. Re:Picture at Linux Weekly News by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does anybody else feel that there is a little problem of missing keyboard/input device on this thing?

  53. Not a hoax by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Steve Mann is a professor at the University of Toronto in Canada, of which I am a student. I've seen his linux-powered watch. Most of the time he just runs a full-screen xclock on it.

    --
    Patrick Doyle

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Not a hoax by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Mod this up, it's actually relevant and interesting!

      p3d0, what else can the watch do and how does he do data input on it? And how does he run X on it??

      Email me.
      Don't trust anyone over 90000.

      --

      +++ATH0
  54. armed and clustered by sdamberger · · Score: 1

    I can just see it now...

    Psst buddy...wanna buy a watch? I'm running a special on beowolf clusters...

  55. Re:Free Time by waldoj · · Score: 2

    Speaking of vendor-propriatary time, check out Swatch Beat Time. (I must confess that I own and use one of these watches.)

    -Waldo
    -------------------

  56. Form factors are the least of it... by frAme57 · · Score: 1

    Industrial designers are coming up with some bizarre ways of using all this new technlogy. In my ID studio class we're trying to come up with wireless gizmo ideas to enter in a Motorolla competition. One guy came up with a bluetooth enabled PDA in the form of an origami frog. The frog is made of either MIT's electronic paper or one of the new light emitting polymers. Yeah, it sounds unlikely but who in say, 1974 would've believed the PalmIIIx's LCD display possible?

    --
    "In a hierarchy every employee will rise to his level of incompetence". The Peter Principle
  57. Pre-Alpha.. by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    This Linux-watch is pre-alpha.. They're probably figuring how to run it at all, not yet considering user interface to be a top priority.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  58. "internet time .beat" Message posted @755 by drivers · · Score: 2

    I was once working on a project with some guys from Israel, Denmark, and other places and we kept trying to meet but we were having some... "communication difficulties" determining what time we were meeting. So we decided to go with .beats, Internet time, whatever you want to call it. At least then we had one source of an absolute time. We only did that a couple times, but for the first time at a mall I noticed the swatch store (something I would usually edit out of my vision (ignore)) and thought it might be cool to have a watch that could display time in .beats.

  59. Linux Journal had an article on a watch like this by Rydor · · Score: 1

    Last months issue of the Linux Journal had a whole article on a watch running Linux, with an Xfree86 display.

  60. but... by vectus · · Score: 1

    But the important thing is will it run wine? i don't know about you, but i don't think i would be able to live without having MS-Bob around with me everywhere i go.

  61. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by iktos · · Score: 1
    Why carry a clock with you everywhere you go when there are clocks everywhere, and you are surrounded by people who wear them as fashion statements.
    Seems to me there're lots of fun places you never go to. (Yes, sometimes it's very useful knowing what time it is even there, and no, you can't judge the approximate time in all of them by the sun.)
  62. fyi - Linux overview by sig226 · · Score: 1

    IBM will be giving an overview of Linux today (8/8/00), see
    http://www.ibm.com/investor/events/

    given its off the investor page, this might be a
    high level presentation.

  63. Hello... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Steve Mann did this a couple of years ago:

    http://www2.linuxjournal.com/lj-issues/issue75/3 993.html
    http://www2.linuxjournal.com/l j-issues/issue75/cover75.jpg

    Called the WearComp, another evolution of the idea of wearables.

    From the article:

    A GNU/Linux Wristwatch Videophone

    This fully functioning prototype, designed and built by Steve Mann in 1998, was demonstrated in 1999 and later used to deliver a videoconference at ISSCC 2000.

    by Steve Mann

    Take a read - well worth it!

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Hello... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Steve Mann did this a couple of years ago:


      Ah, there's the problem, Dr. Mann was working out of University of Toronto. As any fool knows, things aren't invented unless one or more of the following applies:

      It was invented by a US firm

      Al Gore knows about it

      The media accepts the source (subject to periodic forgetfulness and screwing up details)

      The requisite number of (paid) lawyers are involved (20, give or take a mercedes-load)

      Bill Gates is threatening to "innovate" in that direction


      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  64. Re:Lesson from Palm by tooth · · Score: 1
    To be blunt, a watch is a data display device only

    yeah, I'd have to agree. Remember those watches that had a calc in them? remember what the key-pad was like? ever tried to use one?

    Wish list: Okay, maybe have a phone or PDA as the centre for my personal network. Use bluetooth to talk between them. This watch updates its time from my phone that is updated through GSM or WAP or whatever. I would be great to interface with my calendar/appointments and beep when I get mail.

    Oh, and of course scroll /. headlines :)

    __

  65. Re:helLO! Universal Time Coordinate! by zorgon · · Score: 1
    No, that's not correct any more. UTC is UTC. There is no practical difference.

    WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?

    --

    I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

  66. Re:Does it have IrDA? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Good point there. Is that round-looking thing on the side a mouse or something (not that'd I'd ever dream that it could run X)?

    Email me.
    Don't trust anyone over 90000.

    --

    +++ATH0
  67. Okay, this has officially gone too far. by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 3

    I can handle a PDA running Linux. I can even handle a calculator running Linux. But a watch? What's next, a Linux powered hearing aid?

    1. Re:Okay, this has officially gone too far. by hardburn · · Score: 1

      . . . Linux powerd Coffe Maker . . .

      Click here.


      ------

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Okay, this has officially gone too far. by pinktomato · · Score: 1

      >I can handle a PDA running Linux. I can even >handle a calculator running Linux. But a watch? >What's next, a Linux powered hearing aid?

      Umm yes that would actually be quite useful to me. I'm profoundly deaf and have to use state-of-the-art hearing aids that amplify by about 120 decibels, maintain high sound quality, and still fit into the space behind my ear. Quite a lot of processing power there. (the ones i currently have are analogue and come from a converted Israeli missile-tech factory - an actual example of the 'peace dividend!)

      The next set I buy will be digital and needs to sample sound in thousands of channels, with different modifiable responses for each channel (like most deaf people, I hear better at some frequences than others - typically lower ones), and also be able to transpose higher pitched speech sounds (silibants - 's', 'f', etc) into lower channels, distinguish between different auditory environments, cancel noise, detect and auto-cancel feedback (a major problem for very high powered aids), and various other DSP wonders, all of which needs to be individually tuned for the wearer.

      Programming and tuning these things require several months of frequent visits to the audiologists and their computers.

      So yes, there's probably already enough power there to run linux. and I'd love to be able to hack my own aids without having to go to the audiologist. Not to mention running foreign lanuage speech reconition and Babelfish....

      --
      .
    3. Re:Okay, this has officially gone too far. by Devil+Ducky · · Score: 2

      >I can handle a PDA running Linux. I can even handle a calculator running Linux. But a watch? What's next, a Linux powered hearing aid?

      Personally, I'm waiting for a Linux powered toothbrush, just set cron to make it work at night, and I won't have to bother brushing my own teeth anymore, it will all happen while I sleep.

      After that I will be waiting for the Linux powered dentures (for those of us who like to eat but chewing is too much work) and the Linux powered Coffee Maker (I'm truly surprised that doesn't exist yet, combining cafeine with Linux seems obvious), the Linux-enabled phone (instead of getting annoying busy signals you would get annoying kernel panics), the Linux powered winmodem (just seems funny), the linux powered webserver (oh wait, nevermind that), the linux powered keyboard, the linux powered walkman, and last and probably least the linux powered lightbulb.

      Just call me with any other suggestions, so my linux powered answering machine can automatically ignore them.

      Devil Ducky

      --

      Devil Ducky
      MY peers would get out of jury duty.
    4. Re:Okay, this has officially gone too far. by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      What's next, a Linux powered hearing aid?

      How about pacemakers? Now that is device that really want to make sure is crash proof.

      It does raise the point though that at some point the differences between a BIOS and a RTOS disapear and the two merge.

      Think about Transmeta, the OS is embedded in the CPU. Same for planned system-on-a-chip devices. QNX is another example. If the RTOS only has to boot once, it becomes pointless to run it on top of a BIOS.


      Help

    5. Re:Okay, this has officially gone too far. by freebe · · Score: 1

      Crash Proof==RTOS with QoS features. Crash Proof!=Linux, yet. While Linux is the 500-lb gorilla of the OS industry and seems to incorporate every type of operating system sooner or later (Desktop? Server? Mainfraime? RTOS? PDA?), for now RTOS is still king of crash-proof.

      --

      Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

  68. Heh... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Forgot to mention - yes, it runs Linux - plus it has a camera and runs X as well!

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  69. Hmm... by aengblom · · Score: 3

    Anyone else thinking that IBM just invented the "Really Big Pen"??

    ;-)

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  70. goofy grin... by ilkahn · · Score: 2

    how many of you got a goofy grin when you got to this part of the story:

    ``With Linux rapidly becoming an industry standard, it's important that developers be able to create new applications across all platforms, including pervasive devices, and the intent of IBM's research is to further that work,'' IBM said.

    i mean... :) linux rapidly becoming an industry standard... i can't wait.

  71. Lesson from Palm by mfterman · · Score: 5

    The Palm succeeded because it has an interface more suited for a PDA. A wristwatch is going to need something even more stripped down than that. Strangely enough, a GUI is not what is needed for a watch like this. Pure alphanumeric with a few graphical characters is probably what is needed here. Something for the user interface researchers to work on here. As cute as it is to see the command line on a watch, its not very practical.

    To be blunt, a watch is a data display device only. Merging the watch with the pager makes perfect sense and putting your address and appointment book in it. Not sure I'd want to try reading some of my email with it. Maybe just a summary of what is in my PDA through wireless. That is what I really want. A wireless interface between my PDA and my watch to keep the data between them in sync and so I can use my PDA as the data entry device for my watch.

    This falls into the Convergence thread we had elsewhere, about ergonomics and why you don't want a device for doing everything. A watch is good for displaying small amounts of text instantly and with minimal controls for wading through it. It also has a convenience factor to it that is unmatched by any other consumer device. You don't want to load too much gadgetry into it and try to make it do too much. You really just want it to be a specialist device among many. Its not there to replace a PDA any more than a PDA replaces a laptop or a laptop replaces a workstation.

  72. Metric Time, Base Six Degrees, Nautical Units by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    To use a decimal time coordinate system we'd also need to develop a decimal earth coordinate.

    Actually, that would fit rather nicely with the metric units of distance already in use. I believe the meter was arbitrarilly designed to be one millionth of the circumference of the earth (I don't recall if it was at the eqautor, or at some longitude passing through Paris).

    Given that, use 1000 metric degrees per circle, and you have (at the equator) almost exactly one kilometer per degree longitude, and at all lattitudes one kilometer per metric degree latitude.

    Although for navigation (in aviation at least) it wouldn't be any more difficult to use metric minutes and hours with existing units of degrees or distance (nautical miles per metric hour might be silly, but km/mh wouldn't be).[1] For shipping, using sextants to measure off distances, it would make less sense.

    It would definitely be a tradeoff: converting units in physics, and navigation for cars and planes would be as easier, or at worst as easy (no more divide/multiply by 3600), but boat skippers would have a tougher time.

    Of course, since shipping (and aviation for that matter) uses different units for distance, they could continue using the depricated, archaic 24 hour system while the rest of us switch to the more elegant metric approach. :-)

    [1] For reasons of safety (and existing instrumentation) it is unlikely aviation will ever switch from using feet for altitude, nautical miles for distance, or degrees for direction. Switching from inches Hg to millibars, and from 24-hour time to metric time, would be pretty trivial though. Ironically, aviators do use celsius for most temperature measurements -- that conversion was easy to make with no safety implications to speak of (but even so, it isn't 100% complete. A feSomew weather stations still report temperature/dew point spreads in faranheit).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  73. For you John D MacDonald fans by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    Watch (ha!) out for viruses: "cat 1 /dev/poisoned-pokey-thing-on-watch-back"
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  74. Close, but no cigar by pingflood · · Score: 1
    The Time Line for the Definion of the Meter states that the meter was ``originally intended to be one ten-millionth part of the quadrant of the earth.'' However, the current definition of a meter is ``the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second.''

    -pf, link whore

  75. hmm... by heatdeath · · Score: 1

    add this to my pocket protectors and HP SuperCalculator, and....

    dang it, I don't want to be a chick repellant.

    --------------------

    but seriously...
    However, IBM does not have plans to commercialize the Linux watch itself, a spokeswoman said.

    that sucks. so, basically, I'll never get one unless I steal it. *sniff*


    --

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
  76. Re:Microsoft Time by zorgon · · Score: 2
    Nifty! But you know, the real reason we still use seconds and minutes etc is because of the compatibility with our earth coordinate system (latitude and longitude, based on 360 degree circle, 60 minutes to a degree, 60 seconds to a minute). Makes navigation easier.

    To use a decimal time coordinate system we'd also need to develop a decimal earth coordinate. Which would also be nifty, but it would be niftier to develop one based on radians to make it easier to do the math. I can see it now : "What time is it?" "Pi. Break for lunch!"

    WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?

    --

    I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

  77. dick tracy by Brigadier · · Score: 1



    cool very dick tracy esk, linux though ? who would have thunk it. I guess i could always strap my palm to my wrist, and call that a watch.

    1. Re:dick tracy by muse-suit · · Score: 1

      Palm on a watch? Hmmm... http://onhandpc.com/

      --
      --- Hovering at the edge of technology-been there for a while.
  78. This could actually be useful by Fastolfe · · Score: 2

    People are quick to poke fun at logging into your watch, the fact that you'd have to lug around a keyboard to interact with it, etc., but consider that you can build your own interface, make your "watch" do whatever it is you wanted to do. Start up the scripts while it's plugged into your base station, and use its 4 buttons (or whatever) to interact with your software.

    The advantage to putting Linux on this is that you can suddenly use any of your existing development tools and languages to build the wristwatch of your dreams. You want multiple time-zone support? Piece of cake. A count-down timer that has a 13-minute starting point instead of just 10 or 15? 50 different alarms? A custom alarm tune? Hack it in!

    Sure, it's only a watch, but with something like this on your wrist, it's a watch you can do whatever you want with.

    1. Re:This could actually be useful by SwiftBob · · Score: 1

      Looks like we share unpopular belief....our posts are joined at the waists and the idea is the same...Good ideas ;)

      Great minds think alike.
      -Swift ::

      --
      -Swift ::

  79. Tell me about it by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    For about a week I was telling everyone "I don't own or run any Microsoft products AT ALL". Then as I was saying it to Person #10, I looked at my watch. D'OH!
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  80. Been there, done that by Syberghost · · Score: 5

    IBM is two years behind on this one, playing catchup to the Open/Free Source community again.

    --

  81. Wait a sec... by SwiftBob · · Score: 1

    about the first 30 posts i saw were people ranting about how useless this is. Isn't this great? I mean...When cars started coming around, they really sucked...they were loud, slow, uncomfortable, and dangerous. Now...you can get a benz and be respected by a total stranger. Its the same with the watch.

    It doesnt even have to mean that the watch itself is one day going to evolve into a desktop...But it could bring much better things...A tracking system...A pulse monitor...It could hold all your genetic information as means of identification...And it could all be configurable through a linux 'clock' shell! We cant expect things like this to just magically appear...It's not a movie...It's real life, and things have to evolve to a posistion where it is respected by society.

    We ARE moving in a right direction.
    -Swift ::

    --
    -Swift ::

  82. VideoPhone by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

    take a look at this link for an article at linux journal about a GNU/Linux based videophone on a watch :)

  83. Dick Tracy Watch by Alan+Livingston · · Score: 1

    Put a Bluetooth radio on it along with the Linux Bluetooth stack, link it to your Bluetooth aware cell phone and you've almost got a Dick Tracy watch.

    Of course, it's probably esier just to use your cell phone.

    1. Re:Dick Tracy Watch by WillAffleck · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but they already have a voice-recognition cell phone watch ... so you just need to wear two watches and let the skin current provide the data transfer circuit.

      --
      Will in Seattle
  84. Re:Is it just me... by dattaway · · Score: 2

    To have the time continuously updated, simply type this in any shell:

    watch date

  85. Re:Microsoft Time by hobbit · · Score: 1

    It was exactly for this reason (that they tried to move the dateline) that it never caught on. If they had kept the dateline where it was an just decimalised... well, it wouldn't have caught on either, but you know.

    Hamish

    --
    "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  86. Similar thing was in LJ in July... by Booker · · Score: 4
    I think I saw this (or something similar) in a copy of Linux Journal a while back... it even had a camera embedded in it! Check it out here.

    ---

  87. Holo-screens by Aerolith_alpha · · Score: 1

    now we need something like the holo device used in star wars to project the endor mission profile in the briefing room--only it has to be small enough to fit on the watch, so you can use linux (preferably voice based input ( so is it dash or minus rf??--harkens back to the dilbert cartoon with wally shouting DELETE--)) on the nifty holo screen...
    talk about a commuting hazard!!!

    --


    mov ax, 13h
    int 10h
  88. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

    You're a U.S. citizen, ain't ya?

    {Wait, so am I. Nevermind.)

    --
    Dan
  89. Zen operating systems? by joe630 · · Score: 1

    When does linux cease to be linux? It seems to me that this version of linux would be so broken down and rebuilt that it would no longer be linux, but just a bunch of code, just like what's in every digital watch. Someone should define what makes linux linux. If you break linux down over and over, when does it stop being linux?

  90. Um... by veldrane · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be "Dr. SuSE Linux"?

    -Vel

  91. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by festers · · Score: 1

    Preach it brother! Watch-free since '93 :)


    --------

    --


    -------
    "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  92. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by Golias · · Score: 1
    When I'm out in the woods, I always know what time it is... It's either daytime or night-time, and if I am hungry it is time to eat.

    I also know what time it is when I am at a gathering with beer and music, it is party time.

    Lastly, if you stop all the clocks and blot out the sun, I will still instinctively know when it is 7:00 PM Central Standard time on Tuesdays without fail, because that is when it is time for me to sit down and watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

    Still not clear as to why you think I might need a watch. :)

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  93. Re:Some Questions by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    You could easily be 10 years old and rather precocious, I suppose, so:

    1) Yep, but you need to learn how to configure it first. You can read about the basics here if you like. Invest in a Linux book, though. I recommend one by O'Reilly.

    2) Sure, if you spend a few weeks hashing out a concept for a business, learning how to use Apache, building a website and physically provisioning it. What kind of business do you want to start?

    3) Yep, it's a shell. What's beneath it is the actual nuts, bolts, and gears of the operating system, which is called the kernel. How do you get there? Well, if you mean "how do you change how it works," by fiddling with all those nifty files with .rc extensions, the configuration files for all those kernel modules. Again, get a good Linux book which will do a much better job of explaining this than any of us could.

    Or, you could be a troll. But then, I've only wasted a minute or so of my time on you, which is really not much skin off my nose.

    Love, 'Kruzr

    Email me.
    Don't trust anyone over 90000.

    --

    +++ATH0
  94. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by RoninM · · Score: 1

    "Hey buddy, what time you got?"
    A: Eh, I stopped wearing watches when I saw this post on Slashdot...

    --
    If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  95. IBM - $1 billion /year in patent licensing by phossie · · Score: 1

    I think that says it all.

    --

    [|]
  96. I want by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    A linux powered toilet.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:I want by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      About your sig: According to the URL, andover.net is running SOLARIS! Why?

  97. Unlikely to help the image of Linux by streetlawyer · · Score: 1
    Well, I'm not surprised they didn't show a picture; shall we say that this watch is unlikely to match the aesthetic appeal of a Patek Phillippe? More likely, it'll be like walkingaround with a huge great calculator strapped to your wrist. Linux is never gonna crack the market for educated professionals if it continues to be associated with the proleterian, "NetSlave" market sector

    IBM ought to be looking at clever things like the HP calculator initiative. Lots of "Pointy-Haired Bosses" are incipiently tech-savvy, but don't want to show off their skillz for fear of being mistaken for a technical lackey. Anyone who could program the numerical solution algorithm for the Black-Scholes option pricing PDE into a Hewlett-Packard Financial Analyst (and believe me, you won't get through an MBA if you can't) should be able to handle the comparatively trivial installation of Red Hat 6.0. That's the way to go.

    Creating nerdy watches so that the junior interns go "I want one" isn't going to sell a single unit of Linux to the people who really generate the sales orders.

    1. Re:Unlikely to help the image of Linux by deefer · · Score: 1
      Black-Scholes option pricing PDE into a Hewlett-Packard Financial Analyst (and believe me, you won't get through an MBA if you can't) should be able to handle the comparatively trivial installation of Red Hat 6.0.


      Hmm, I have programmed B-S option pricing models, equity & derivatives pricing from scratch, and I _still_ can't get RH 6.0 to like my OEM ARK2000 graphics card!!! Still running at a generous 800*600; I _know_ the card can do 1024*768...

      Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

      --

      Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

  98. Hmm... by Greyfox · · Score: 3
    Add this to the IBM tech to communicate data over your body's electric field and you could have something interesting...

    1) Keep your business card on your watch. When you shake hands with someone else wearing a similar watch, it trades business cards.

    2) Let your watch talk to your PDA through your body's electric field.

    3) Let your watch and your PDA talk to your MP3 player through your body's electric field.

    4) Automatically synch your watch, your PDA and your MP3 player when you sit down at your computer (Though I think the protocol was too slow to download MP3s last time I read about it.)

    Down sides:

    1) Your body, PDA, Watch and MP3 player would have to run Lotus Notes.

    2) If you want to run the latest thing from Lotus, you'd have to be running Windows.

    3) Who knows what your watch, PDA and MP3 player are REALLY talking about? They could be conspiring to kill you!

    4) They'll recruit your computer in their evil plot when you sit down at your computer. They might even have a chat with your car on the topic.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  99. Slashdot bait? Don't feed the trolls! by GlassUser · · Score: 1
    Anyone stop to wonder if IBM is just trying to sell out to the linux hype crowd? First the Transmeta interference play, now a release about running linux on a watch. Or perhaps they're about to sell their big blue soul to Bill Gates, and are just trying ot glaze it over with flak.

  100. Cute, but... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

    I love hi-tech toys as much bas the next guy, but I think this is going a bit far!

    "What time is it?"

    "I dunno, I'm just re-booting my watch!"

  101. It's not insane, but not newsworthy either by nosilA · · Score: 2
    Before everyone starts saying things like "I wonder if I can make a Beowulf cluster" or "Why the hell would someone want to run linux on a watch," let me just say that this makes some sense.

    They want a watch that will sync with a computer, like the Timex DataFlash or whatever the hell they call it. They are being lazy, so they want a pre-packaged OS. And it's a lot easier to shrink down linux than it is to shrink down WinCE. I write embedded code for DSP's, and I wish we didn't have to write every single little serial transfer line in ASM, but we are restricted to using this processor for various reasons. If IBM can make a watch, put in a processor that can run Linux, and easily code a little transfer mechanism for it, so be it.

    Lots of little computerized devices run various OS's, like Linux - so it's not a big deal!

    -nosilA, who is moderately annoyed that there are two "we run linux on this cute little thing" stories in a row.

    1. Re:It's not insane, but not newsworthy either by beebware · · Score: 1

      Casio currently do MP3 watches - I've seen them advertised for around $300 (219UKP IIRC) - dunno the full spec - but it shows it's easily possible to put Linux on it.
      I wonder which Linux build they are using though - Intel, ARM... or if they've had to write their own main kernel...
      Richy C.
      --

  102. umm by beXta · · Score: 1

    I don't know if anyone has noticed this, but how exactly do you enter data/commands into the watch? There doesn't seem to be any keys on the watch and the screen looks like its so small that if it did have pen recognision that you would have to write one letter, wait and then the next letter.. etc

    Ahh what ever happened to that voice controled linux distro? Look out dick tracy :)

  103. Oh the many many uses! by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 5

    Multi-tasking: "Look honey! I'm telling the hours AND the minutes simultaneously!"
    Journaling Filesystem: If my watch goes down, I won't lose my other timezone settings.
    Scriptability: No more trying to figure out what watch band hole to use. Just setup a cron job to periodically ioctl(IOTIGHTEN, "/dev/band").
    Multi-user: My friend can tell the time while I'm busy using the stopwatch.

    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:Oh the many many uses! by freebe · · Score: 2

      Floating Point: "Not just a calculator watch, but one that crunches SETI@Home cycles in its free time!"

      --

      Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

  104. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
    Admittedly it's not hard to tell the time on an analog watch, but those few milliseconds more it takes, multiplied by the thousands of times you look at your watch, is a significant productivity hit.

    Absolute nonsense. When I look at an analog clock, I know what time it is practially instantly. For me, there is a "significant productivity hit" in reading numbers off of a digital clock, and then translating that to a picture of hour and minute hands in my head. My internal representation (Private data members?) of time is analog.

    And, out of curiosity, why do you think the FAA required clocks in airplane cockpits to be analog until just a couple of years ago? You can read an analog clock out of the corner of your eye.

    Bingo Foo

    ---

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  105. Preference for Analogue by Nexx · · Score: 1

    Digital *watches* may be better for accuracy, but I think I prefer analogue *clocks*, as they can be read from greater distances to give a "good-enough" first-order analysis of how late I am to a particular meeting. Usually, if there are a multitude of suits attending, the number will be quite high :-)

    plus, pure-mechanical analogue watches with clear bezels are more interesting, IMO, than the circuit-board design of a digital one. Seriously, I wear the watch almost exclusively for the "oooh, a shiny thing" effect. Otherwise, the NTP-synch'ed clock on my puter, along with an appointment scheduler interrupting my train of thought, does better for me as it frees me from having to glance every 5 seconds nervously for the time to change.
    --

  106. No, it hasn't. by Booker · · Score: 3
    You're assuming that the embedded Linux only tells time. That would be silly, I'll grant you that. But surely it does more than that - it opens up possibilities...

    What's next, a Linux powered hearing aid?

    Sure - only it's one with voice recognition, speach synthesis, and a wireless link to babelfish...! You laugh... give it 20 years, max.

    ---

    1. Re:No, it hasn't. by freebe · · Score: 1

      In 20 years, we'll have neural implants to improve thought - and translate other languages for us. Don't believe it? Read Kurzwiel's Age of Spiritual Machines.

      --

      Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

    2. Re:No, it hasn't. by British · · Score: 3

      Yeah, but for some reason it won't listen to constructive criticism about Linux. :)

  107. Re:Free Time by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

    All I want is for daylight wasting time to end, and for the day to start at dawn, not midnight. Is that too much to ask for? :)

  108. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by Devil+Ducky · · Score: 2

    You mean that's what those numbers on sign at the bus stop are for? I always thought they were tracking numbers or something

    Devil Ducky

    --

    Devil Ducky
    MY peers would get out of jury duty.
  109. That's a lot of fsckin' watches! by Mtgman · · Score: 1

    DAMN! Now I'll have to wear one watch for each Linux distro or risk being shunned at the local LUG. Let's see
    Red Hat
    Caldera
    Debian
    Suse
    Slackware
    ...(repeat ad nauseum)

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  110. Free Time by kieran · · Score: 4

    Don't think for a second that this is merely a pointless gimmick - it's a necessary component for truly Free Time.

    No longer will we need to be tied down by vendor-proprietrary time: the ability to hack time to our own open source, GPL'd, and entirely bizarre standards.

    "You're five minutes late."
    "Not by my watch, you whore of Casio! I'm 37 chimpanzees early, for insert-deity-here's sake!"
    "Foiled again! Damn you and your Free Time!"

  111. Re:Picture at Linux Weekly News (obligatory mirror by po_boy · · Score: 1
    that link at lwn is nearly slashdotted. If you can't get it to work, there's a copy of just the image at:

    http://dotslash.dynodns.net/00/08/07/147245/linuxw atch_pen.jpg

    please only use it if you can't get lwn to load.

    As always, if anyone with any kind of authority wants my mirror down, please mail me and let me know.

  112. Re:Picture at Linux Weekly News by Brigadier · · Score: 1



    where is the keyboard interface

  113. You young kids didn't learn to tell time :-) by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Back when I was a kid, "clockwise" didn't just mean "The numbers get bigger" :-)

    Seriously, though, people who learned to tell time on analog time tend to interpret it differently than people who do digital time. The shape of the hands gives you a feel for how much of the day has gone by, and how long it is until some event (e.g. the next hour or half-hour), and if you're using a digital clock you have to burn milliseconds of brain-CPU figuring out those things, which are more often what you really wanted to know than "tell me the numbers you see on your clock". Also, analog folks are more likely to say things like "quarter past three" than "3:14:47pm" - usually rounding to the nearest 5 minutes is just fine.

    I personally prefer digital wristwatches (my current one also has GPS:-), and my computer tells me time in nice clear digital instead of adding yet another cluttery low-resolution Microsoft icon. But when I'm in the train station wanting to know how much I need to rush to get to the train, or whether I've missed it and should go for the next train, I want to just *see* the clock, not calculate minutes.


    Grateful Dead lyrics, from W alk In The Sunshine by Barlow&Weir:


    You got to deep-six your wristwatch
    You got to try and understand
    The time it seems to capture
    Is just the movement of its hands.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  114. Lisp Machine On A Wristwatch by billstewart · · Score: 1
    On the other hand, the LispMachine-emulator version is equally useless
    Time-p?
    T

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  115. SMART! Go IBM! by Accipiter · · Score: 3
    International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM - news) said on Monday that researchers are running the Linux operating system on a prototype wristwatch device, in a research test designed to show that Linux can be used as the basic software on the smallest devices.

    We already knew this, but hey! This can easily refute the people who say that Linux isn't downward scaleable. "Hey, see my watch? It runs Linux! How's THAT for downward scaling?"

    However, IBM does not have plans to commercialize the Linux watch itself, a spokeswoman said.

    That's a very smart move. Anyone remember the Timex Data-Link watch? I'm not sure I totally buy this as research, though - because if you back up a bit:

    ``Designed to communicate wirelessly with PCs, cell phones and other wireless-enabled devices, the 'smart watch' will have the ability to view condensed email messages and directly receive pager-like messages,'' IBM said in a statement.

    Erm, all of this for "research"? Sounds like a marketable product to me....but again: "IBM, REMEMBER THE DATA-LINK?"

    Linux, which was developed by Finnish programmer Linus Torvalds, is used for many basic functions of Web sites, but is not yet considered mature enough for heavier business tasks.

    It's not? Well jeez, I guess the millions of businesses that run Linux exclusively aren't considered 'Heavy.' Those Corporate Internet Solutions Providers are going to be disturbed to hear they aren't considered a "Heavy Business Task", and that their Linux infrastructure is only handling the "basic functions" of their operation.

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  116. Am I the only one who noticed this? by Quietust · · Score: 1

    Take a look at the (recently added) picture of the watch. Look closely at the screen...
    # cat hw
    Hello Watch

    Nice alternate "first program" :)

    -- Sig (120 chars) --
    Your friendly neighborhood mIRC scripter.

    --
    * Q
    P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
  117. Bluetooth and Beowulf watch by billstewart · · Score: 1

    The obvious communication method for a Beowulf cluster of wristwatches would be Bluetooth . Arm fulla Viking technology (Actually Harald Bluetooth was a couple hundred years after Beowulf was written...)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Bluetooth and Beowulf watch by mmaddox · · Score: 1

      Good point! Assuming that the damnable thing ever comes OUT. Sheesh!

      --

      What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

  118. Is everyone jealous??? by JordoCrouse · · Score: 4

    I think a lot of people are jealous of the engineers at IBM (I know I am), because they get to sit around and get paid huge amounts of money just to screw around and try new stuff. If only the rest of us could be as lucky...

    I can just imagine the staff meetings:
    Engineer 1: Did you taste the coffee this morning? It was horrible...
    Engineer 2: Yeah, maybe we should throw Linux on the coffee maker and see if that helps
    Manager: Sounds good to me. Do it. And if you get it to make a mocha, I'll give you a bonus.

    --
    Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    1. Re:Is everyone jealous??? by sailesh · · Score: 1

      It's a fun place to work. It really is. Send us your resume if you want to join in.

    2. Re:Is everyone jealous??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      This is funny, but IBM's research labs really are full of people just exploring the possiblities. There are whole groups of people experimenting with form factors like, say a computer in an earring. I kid you not, there is a guy I met with, among other things, a perfectly ordinary pair of earrings on his desk. His boss promised him that he'd wear them around all day if he could make it so it would whisoer his email to him.

  119. how do you type on one of these? by sfraggle · · Score: 1

    like the subject says: how _do_ you type on a watch. The picture showed a command shell and one of the linked articles mentioned a "touchscreen" but it doesnt mention how it actually works.

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
  120. "Excuse me, what time is it?" by laetus · · Score: 5

    "No problem, hold a a sec" (types in the following):

    [root@localhost]$ date

    [root@localhost]$ Mon Aug 7 10:44:49 EDT 2000


    "It's 10:44"

    "Thanks"


    ---------------------------------

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    1. Re:"Excuse me, what time is it?" by mirko · · Score: 2
      Now, if they just had a graffiti interface, I'm sure this...
      • is possible
      • would be a hit
      Now, how do we write ^]:wq in graffiti ???
      --
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:"Excuse me, what time is it?" by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1

      Well, assuming he's also running ntpd then that time should prolly be reported as "10:44:49 and a bit".

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:"Excuse me, what time is it?" by bob_jordan · · Score: 1

      "Hold on a sec" (Presses key to clear seti-at-hand screen saver and notices mail from seti organisers)

      "Hey I just found alien life"

      "Is it in the room?"

      Bob.

    4. Re:"Excuse me, what time is it?" by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      You should no better than to walk around running your wristwatch as root.

      The concept of illegal plants and animals is obnoxious and ridiculous.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
  121. not to be stereotypical by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    but a comment such as, "it's ... CUTE" makes me wonder where the female slashdot news posters are.
    --
    Peace,
    Lord Omlette
    ICQ# 77863057

    --
    [o]_O
  122. Back in the gool ol' days by baka_boy · · Score: 2

    You know, text entry on a watch, while painfully slow and inaccurate, *can* be done. Anyone remember the old Casio Data Bank watches? Sure, they we *really expensive* -- like $50-75. Yes, they only held a few hundred reminders or phone numbers. They were also designed in the late eighties, which leads me to believe that we might be able to improve on the design just a bit.

    It seems to me that there are a number of potential uses for something that small, secure, and cheap, even without extensive user I/O. How about a few MB of storage space, so you can use it like a handful of floppies? (I've often wished that my 8MB Palm was willing to cough up even 1-2MB so I could take some new downloads, umm, I mean, Word documents, home from work.) Or, add a low-power RF tranciever, and use the thing as a local pager -- get up and walk around while your code compiles, or get pinged when email arrives, etc. (Hell, then the damn things *could* exchange business cards, etc.)

    If it's running Linux, on a standard (if stripped down) kernel, all these and more are possible from the software side; as with many such barely-marketable ideas, however, getting the hardware build seems like it would be a significantly larger challenge. I wonder if those IBM boys are gonna need that prototype after the press have snapped a few pictures...

  123. Speak to me in whispers by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    how exactly do you enter data/commands into the watch?

    Well, IBM seems to be pushing speech recognition a lot, so maybe you talk to it.

    Fetch, Strappy, Fetch!

    No! Bad Watch! Unmount that CD now!

    --
    Will in Seattle
  124. Reaction to picture... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Here is the picture of the watch, and it's DAMN CUTE! Linux Weekly News

    Go away, nothing to see here, move along.

    *looks both ways*

    MINE!!! MINE DAMMIT!! ME FIRST!!! GIMME!!!!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  125. Input by mach-5 · · Score: 2

    So how is input entered? Is there tiny keyboard to go with it, and a special dialing wand? OR, does it have something to do with that little wheel on the right?

  126. Reboot? by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    What do you mean reboot your watch? This is a Linux watch ... you must be thinking of MSFT's new project, the WinWatch (TM,R,S,T,U,V). Keeps perfect time until you have to reboot, but you have to do that once a day, and then you look like you have fleas while you shake your hand vigorously.

    But it's in color!

    --
    Will in Seattle
  127. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by drivers · · Score: 2

    That is fine as long as there are clocks around. There are time when you want to know if you can spend some more time in the bookstore before heading over to the movie theater (or whatever) and there just aren't any damn clocks around. You can go without a watch as long as there are clocks around and your life is predictable and controlled. And you can live without a wallet by just putting the things you will need for a particular excursion into the world until you get home next. That doesn't mean your somehow more enlightened and in control.

    (still like your sig. :)

  128. Said to be had by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    Brings new meaning to the phrase "Handshake" ...

    --
    Will in Seattle
  129. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by drivers · · Score: 1

    Damn. That was the most incoherent and buggy message I've ever written. What I meant to say was: "Bull."

  130. Anoto has an input solution. by orichter · · Score: 2

    Check out http://www.anoto.com/ They have a new bluetooth based pen which would be an ideal companion to this watch. The pen is strong on input, but weak on output. The watch is the other way around. I saw this demoed a couple of weeks ago. It was pretty damn cool.

  131. Security Concerns, the root of all evil by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    So, if you lose your watch in some bushes, do your friends ask you:

    "Got Root?"

    --
    Will in Seattle
  132. I wonder ... by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    if you get the BSD version, does it have a little devil on the faceplate, with a pitchfork for the hour hand and the tail for the second hand?

    But they're real secure!

    --
    Will in Seattle
  133. Picture at Linux Weekly News by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5
    1. Re:Picture at Linux Weekly News by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      That picture begs the question of how the user interacts with the watch. It looks like there's a microphone there (or maybe it's a speaker so that ^G's work) - maybe it uses voice-recognition? That'd be kinda cool (maybe a Linux port of ViaVoice?). Or do you need to telnet/ssh/rlogin/whatever into it from a computer over the wireless connection to actually interact? And it doesn't look terribly useful, considering it seems to be missing a time-display.

      There's only so small you can make these devices until the lack of a useable user-interface makes them rather useless. There's only so small a keyboard can get until it is no longer really useable by human hands - and laptops have already pushed that as far as it can reasonably go. Plus the interface area looks a hair too small to be very useful - I can't imaging trying to go through man pages or reading READMEs on that thing. This seems to be of limited usefulness - although it's nice to know that IBM considers embedded Linux to be the way of the future.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    2. Re:Picture at Linux Weekly News by baywulf · · Score: 1

      "That picture begs the question of how the user interacts with the watch. It looks like there's a microphone there (or maybe it's a speaker so that ^G's work) - maybe it uses voice-recognition?"

      I doubt it is voice recognition because that would require hefty computing power to work reasonably. In reality it seems to be much cruder according to an article I read. The round thing to the right side is a scrolling wheel like that on some mouses so you probably scroll your way through various keystrokes. But that is probably better and faster than using tiny keys.

  134. Re:looks like a dial by Evangelion · · Score: 1


    turning the dial is probably what that pen is there for...


    --

  135. Fact Sheet on AllLinuxDevices by MichaelH · · Score: 2

    We have the fact sheet on AllLinuxDevices.

    Some of the features:

    • 2.2 kernel
    • 8 MB Flash, 8 MB DRAM
    • 1.5 oz.
    • IrDA


    ---
    Michael Hall

    --

    Michael Hall
    mph.puddingbowl.org

  136. You mean the Claudia Schiffer special edition one? by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    Since she has her own version of a Palm Vx, maybe she'll do her own IBM Linux Watch.

    Costs a little more, but the solar-powered and jewelled wristband just adds that elegent touch to any DefCon ...

    --
    Will in Seattle
  137. What about the script kiddies? by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    They'll scoot by on their Razors, bump into you, let the body current make the connection, and hack your watch so you miss your bus.

    Hey, you should have used an original password and shouldn't have been in root - whaddya expect?

    --
    Will in Seattle
  138. What next? by MartinG · · Score: 1

    Linux in a box?
    Linux on a wristwatch?
    Suddenly the segfault story about linux on an transistor doesn't seem so ridiculous!
    Maybe they can go further. Linux in a meson?

    --
    -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
  139. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by carlfish · · Score: 1
    "It is so much easier to tell the time accurately on a digital wristwatch, anybody who uses an analog watch is using it simply because of the way it looks and because it's supposedly more "serious" or "mature" to wear an analog watch."

    It is very rare that anyone needs to tell the time accurately. Most of the time, you're just interested in the nearest 10/15/30 minutes. The great thing about an analog watch is that you rarely have to parse the entire thing - you just have to get a general idea of where the hands are, and after a while of wearing one, you intuit the rest.

    With analog watches, it's also easier to figure out (generally, again) intervals, since you can skip the arithmetic, all you're doing is pattern-matching different locations of hands. Analog watches are also easier to read in low-light conditions, since being able to see the general placement of hands is significantly easier than trying to discern the difference between digital 0 and 8 in the dark. Analog watches are generally less bulky than digital watches, and more likely to survive if water leaks in.

    It's all a question of comfort, certainly not productivity. This is why I wear analog watches. Some people may process information differently to me, and prefer digital watches. More power to them.

    Admittedly it's not hard to tell the time on an analog watch, but those few milliseconds more it takes, multiplied by the thousands of times you look at your watch, is a significant productivity hit.

    This is a fallacious argument, because it assumes that the extra milliseconds are cumulative time taken away from productive work. If you look at your watch while wandering down the street, you've lost nothing. Even while you're working, you're constantly task switching between productive and un-productive thoughts, so a few milliseconds extra to look at a watch is just part of that the noise.

    Charles Miller
    --

    --
    The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
  140. Linux Journal Report by OctaneZ · · Score: 3

    Linux Journal had an article about GNU/Linux on a wristwatch with videoconferencing last month, here is a link to the appropriate month with a picture of the watch on the cover even!
    http://www2.linuxjournal. com/lj-issues/issue75/index.html

    1. Re:Linux Journal Report by Coq · · Score: 1

      Sorry, If you read the article, you'll see that linux is not actually on the wristwatch. data is sent to/from another computer. the watch only has the camera and the display. Although that set-up does make the system more modular, the watch is only an input/output device.

      --
      Information wants Coq
  141. Too much time on their hands (Not really) by Emperor+Cezar · · Score: 1

    A couple of weeks ago I was attending the NexTech Computer conference. Durring that time we were allowed to visit IBM R&D. While I was their I learned that the researchers are alowed to work on what they want. This is why they even started to use linux in the first place. Oh and I got to see the Transmetta maching in action in thier testing labs. Got some pictures too. Inside and out. I liked the cover for one of the drives that said, "Transmetta Mobile Linux hd #002" Also one of the transmetta researchers let me see some crusoe chips. I even got to hold them. Just bragging.

  142. Whoops by Iron_Slinger · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately, there isn't enough RAM to hold any time conversion routines so it just spits out seconds since the Epoch.

    What time is it?
    965660410

    IS

  143. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    Unless you spend your entire life at bus-stops, it doesn't make a difference. When you leave the house (or classroom, or cafe or workplace or whatever), you have lot's of clocks to visually prompt you to leave. Once your underway, having a watch doesn't change a thing. If you're late for the bus, you'll still be late even with a diamond-studded Rolex.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  144. helLO! Universal Time Coordinate! by zorgon · · Score: 2
    The Time Lords of Earth have free access to their data via the U.S. Naval Observatory (and elsewhere, this one is in the States). http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/time.html

    And, to join the system (become a junior Time Lord), read up on NTP!!

    Don't settle for anything less than UTC for your timekeeping needs.

    WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?

    --

    I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

  145. Dr. Seuss Linux by AstynaxX · · Score: 4

    Linux in a box,
    Linux under rocks,
    Linux in a watch,
    Linux in your cr*tch,
    Linux in your hair,
    Linux everywhere.
    Everywhere, we don't care,
    We'll shove Linux everywhere.

    [Disclaimer: I truly support what Linux, GNU, the Open Source community, et. al. are trying to do, but gimicks are not the way. Please, think before you stick something into a random hole]

    -={(Astynax)}=-

    --
    -={(Astynax)}=-
    "Darkness beyond Twilight"
  146. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by Golias · · Score: 1
    Lucky for me there's always a guy like you standing next to me in the bookstore. "Hey buddy, what time you got?"

    Seriously, though... Take off your watch for a couple months and you will find that you tend to adjust to knowing how long you are browsing books.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  147. Excellent! by phaze3000 · · Score: 1

    Now they can release a wrist-watch which gives unix-time!

    Actually, when you think about it it could be more useful than it seems at first. Once linux boots on it, how hard is it going to be to add a copy of mpg123 and have it as an MP3 player as well?
    Of course, like 95% of the other geeks that read slashdot my first thought was 'Kool! I could telnet into my wristwatch!' :)

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  148. Re:Only good until 2038 by splog · · Score: 1

    except by then we'll all be using
    64bit watches

  149. redundant and trollish (with a flamebait seasoning by slakhead · · Score: 1
    wow, slashdot finally caught up to last month's Linux Journal

    yeah it is actually on the cover
    the article is on page 86

    anyway i could just be jumping to conclusions because they watch may very well be a different watch but i wanted to complain and make a fool out of myself so i could be a "karma whore"

    here is the online article

    :)

  150. Another link by LizardKing · · Score: 2

    Another link with info is All Linux Devices.

    Chris

  151. Toilet Paper by Pao|o · · Score: 1

    Next thing you'll know we'll have an innovative triple-ply toilet paper running Linux with Tux on each square with his tongue sticking out.

  152. exactly by the_next_wonk · · Score: 1

    it's good they aren't running windows on it, cause it would be more like: Casual Passerby: could you tell me the time please? Person wearing watch: yeah... oh sorry, my watch seems to have crashed...

  153. The scary part by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    I'm in the process of refurbishing some mac pluses to do fun things with them- basically fixing them up and painting them black. They boot off floppies (800K only) and have no drives or fans anywhere in them, so they're dead silent. Given a small modem they can happily dial into a shell account- I was reading Slashdot last night on one via lynx- and of course there's text editing using TeachText (very small program), and I am planning to test out whether I can use them and boot into vi- not a joke- the Mac port of Vim is what I'll be testing, to see if the 68K version will cope with a Plus- set it up as a Finder replacement, and presto, a tiny 60W black vi box :)

    That's not scary? Correct, the scary bit is this- I doubt I can make a plus boot Linux, because IBM's watch has EIGHT TIMES the ram of these little computers o_O not to mention 8M 'disk' to boot off as opposed to the 800K floppy...

    Still, it looks very likely that I can at least get vi onto one of these little buggers eventually. I'll call them linux training boxes, a sort of art project :)

  154. ZDTV by eric2hill · · Score: 1

    I was watching ZDTV on my dish this weekend and they showed one at the PC expo in NYC. The device had a tiny LCD that was set in a watch "cover" - but a little skewed like it was quickly thrown together. It had a ribbon cable coming out of it to another machine - my guess is the watch was just a display and the ribbon just showed the display off another device. They mentioned IR or Bluetooth synchronization but for now it's simply vapor. Good idea - just several months out.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    LOADING...
    READY.
    RUN
  155. linux on a wristwatch... by wishus · · Score: 3

    ...because i need a multi-user operating system on my wrist.

    wish
    ---

  156. Another damn gadget by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    for people to fsck with while they're supposed to be paying attention to the road!

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
  157. PFC by beagle · · Score: 1

    Now that's Pretty Freakin' Cool. IBM has certinly been doing some cool development around Linux - first their 41,000 "machine" super server, now a wristwatch. PFC.

  158. Scenario in near future: by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    "...yea... I was all messed-up at a party and instead of just reading her 'romantic preferences' file I downloaded and caught a nasty virus."

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
  159. Re:Analog watch users are lying to themselves by nathanh · · Score: 1

    I don't wear a watch either. Haven't worn one since 1991. When you carry around a mobile phone and palmpilot at all times, there's hardly any need for another expensive gizmo to tell you the time.

  160. ObSimpsonsQuote by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    Smithers: What time is it?
    Bart: It's ten eight-four....no, wait...what comes after twelve?
    Smithers: One.
    Bart: No! After twelve.
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:ObSimpsonsQuote by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Almost.

      Lisa: We'll help you.
      Bart: I have a watch with a minute hand.
      Smithers: [sighs] All right, you can come. What time is it?
      Bart: 12:80. No wait. Wait. Wh-what comes after 12?
      Smithers: One.
      Bart: No, after twelve!
      Smithers: [groan]

      Use the Simpsons Archive and spare yourself this whining. :)

      --
      For more information, click here.
  161. hehe by linuxgod · · Score: 1

    I want that watch.

  162. Not really by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 2

    The "Linux on a Watch" from the LJ article doesn't actually run Linux. The thing on your wrist is really just an X display (and webcam) with a watch band. The processor and OS are hooked to your belt (or in another room, IIRC). The time is told using a modified version of oclock.
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  163. Kernel death? by SpeakerEnder · · Score: 1
    A man slumps in despair
    He looked at his watch
    Found only "kernel death"

    -SpeakerEnder

    --

    -SpeakerEnder
    Thou art God.

  164. Microsoft Time by grahamsz · · Score: 5

    Redmond, WA - Microsoft today announced the release of Microsoft Time 2000. This updated version of their popular package incorporates 6 all new hours into the day.

    The US DoJ slammed microsofts innovation claiming it was an attempt to force their competitors 24 hour system out of use. MS would not speak to us directly but did issue the following statement:

    We are not trying to force anyone out of business but are merely trying to cater for customer demand. Our users wanted more time in the day to surf the internet and drink beer so understandably we have built this into our product.

    Industry Analysts fear customers will be taken in by the microsoft hype and are warning that unless you clock is sufficiently powerful then you will find that time runs too slowly to be useful.

    1. Re:Microsoft Time by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      In 1960s the french actually tried decimal time :)

      Now that's cool :)

    2. Re:Microsoft Time by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      All too real... remember Swatch @beats?

      Did anyone actually use those? It always struck me that Swatch were just bored of GMT being the international standard, so invented one based around Switzerland :)

    3. Re:Microsoft Time by cfelde · · Score: 1

      Microsoft all ready have there own time standard... ever tried installing Windows? When it says it's just 5 minutes left, it really isn't! Not compared to any normal clock ;)

      --
      - cfelde
  165. Wow! by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

    I have got to get me one of these.
    Thank god its not CE.

    "What time is it ?"
    "I dunno, my watch just has a blue screen!"

    ... anyway


    until (succeed) try { again(); }

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
  166. All the details and the purpose here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    http://alllinuxdevices.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=20 00-08-07-005-03-PS-WL-WB

  167. IBM is the gateway by ARColeslaw · · Score: 1

    IBM could be considered a major gateway for Linux becoming more "mainstream." linux needs the support of the big companies in order to win over the average consumer.

    --
    ...would you like coleslaw with that?
  168. So to tell the time do you, by bob_jordan · · Score: 3

    press any key to clear the tiny seti-at-hand screen saver.

    Bob.

  169. I don't even wear a watch by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    "a watch is a data display device only"
    And a small one at that. If I want to know the time, the mobile phone in my pocket will tell me. So will my TRGpro (PalmOS) which I carry around almost as often.

    I got sick of scratching my watch on things as I reached behind stuff. Now I'm against things you can't take off and put aside easily. Even my Palm belt-pouch thing has a quick-release catch.

    I've been thinking about the Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy (the novel, not the guide someone's putting together) with the comment about how under evolved we are because we think digital wristwatches are a good idea, and how true that's becoming...

  170. Great! Re:Super by JimPooley · · Score: 1

    I bought a watch with a lifetime guarantee...
    When the mainspring goes, it slashes your wrist!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  171. Re:"Excuse me, what time is it?" -user-friendlier by Kickasso · · Score: 1
    [Netscape: Dotslash. Stuff for nerds. News that matter]
    Ctrl+Alt+Down
    [XEmacs: elisa]
    Ctrl+Alt+Down
    [XClock: Mon Aug 7 10:44:49 EDT 2000]

    "It's 10:44"

    "Thanks"

    Ctrl+Alt+Down
    [Enlightenment received signal SIGSEGV]
    --

  172. Okay, Poll: How many of you actually read this? by CrayDrygu · · Score: 3
    Seeing all the comments like this one and this one and this one make me wonder...

    How many of you people actually read these articles? Because it's obvious you're not getting the full story. Let me enlighten you:

    However, IBM does not have plans to commercialize the Linux watch itself, a spokeswoman said.

    ``This is just research prototype,'' said Takako Yamakura. ''Some say Linux cannot be scaled down. This is just to show Linux is capable of doing this.''

    In other words...get over it, guys. Sorry, no linux watch for you. Not from IBM, anyway.

    And as for Mr. "No good will come of this" (my third link) -- Judging from Takako's comment, I'd say this will help a lot more than it can harm. After all, if Linux can be scaled down to fit on a wristwatch, it can obviously be used for [insert name of portable device here].

    --

    --

    --
    "I personal[ly] think Unix is "superior" because on LSD it tastes like Blue." -- jbarnett

  173. You don't even need a console by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1
    You don't even need a console to read the date: just write a driver for your printer, wire the printer to your watch, and blindly type date > /dev/printer.

    Of course, you'll have to carry your printer along with you, but that's so cool. Then, as an alternative, simply putting a bracelet on you existing printer might just do the trick if your printer as a Print Test Page button with the time and date on it. Or maybe you could also carry your printer in a bag back. You'll be free to get the time and date anywhere you go within 15 feet of the power plug in the wall!

  174. Security Concerns by Lechter · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how secure IBM's distribution is?

    I mean I wouldn't want hackers breaking into my watch. I mean, my God, they could do something as drastic as...as... change the time! Then I'd be forced to depend on the clock on my wall, on my phone, on my computer, etc...

    In that case what if I were to forget my password, or if those hackers were to change it? Would I be locked out of my watch?

    Guy on street: "Pardon me, do you have the time?"

    IBM engineer: "Sorry, I forgot my password so I can't logon to my watch."

    Gut on street: ???

    --
    credo quia absurdum
  175. Potential Trademark infringements by langed · · Score: 1

    IBM had best not release it calling it a "Smart Watch." That name was taken about 15 years ago, by Tandy, for the add-on chip which provided the Tandy 1000 series with a clock which did not need to be reset on each bootup. Much like the CMOS chip does for most semi-modern computers of today.

  176. Re:Why? - Thats why! by Vspirit · · Score: 2

    Open your mind/eyes and you will see..
    This is a step in a forward direction.

    For over five years I have been thinking and dreaming about the watchphone becoming reality. I even had the idea of registering watchphone.com, but unfortunately when I first got pulled myself together years after, it was taken, and have been nothing but a dummy page ever since. I kick myself in the butt today for my lack of activity at the right time.

    Anyways, with running a unix system on the wrist watch, you are heading in the right direction (and concidering IBM now plan to make huge mobile investments with divisions in Europe counting 5000employees in this sector alone, they obviously are going for keeps). Having the unix system on the 'watchphone' as I call it, you have compatibility and scalability of the future. You have a terminal, which will be empowered by highspeed wireless connectivity solutions(hence IBM's future plans) from which you can control your security camera at home, watch the kiddies while being in the other room, watch your home, and activate automatic functions when away so when you return home, your bed has been prepared, your coffee is ready, dinner is ready, etc.. You can also do video/phone conferences, multimedia sessions, communicate with the entire world from that thing on your wrist.. 'I've got the whole world, in my hands.. - would partly become true' its called convergence of technology, its the future, and IBM knows it!

    Combine it with some of Seiko/Epson's new display techology or whatever comes next, this is quite enchanting..

    Having speculated in this area, made drawings, designed user interfaces, etc.. for years just for the fun of it, have been exciting.. seing it come true will be awesome.. now I come to think of it.. the device was also described in one of William Gibson's books too..

    Should IBM, Nokia or alike be interested, then I would happily participate in the R&D of this.. contact me at caspera@sophistic.com :)

  177. Someone else did this, too by penguinboy · · Score: 1

    But it was for videoconferencing or the like - the watch had a small color display and a camera. It even ran X. This was in last month's Linux Journal, or the one before that.

  178. Analog watch users are lying to themselves by seldolivaw · · Score: 1
    Seriously! This isn't just flamebait. It is so much easier to tell the time accurately on a digital wristwatch, anybody who uses an analog watch is using it simply because of the way it looks and because it's supposedly more "serious" or "mature" to wear an analog watch.

    Admittedly it's not hard to tell the time on an analog watch, but those few milliseconds more it takes, multiplied by the thousands of times you look at your watch, is a significant productivity hit. Anybody who wants a watch to tell the time rather than send some stupid conformist message, will use a digital watch. And it's not like you can't get stylish looking digital watches; watch companies simply prefer to sell analog watches because they can make more money on them.

    Moderate me down if you want, but really, I find it hard to believe people of the 21st century are still using analog clocks and watches to tell the time!

  179. End of specialized embedded OS near? by just+dave · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that embedded computing will get
    easier and easier as the platform becomes more
    and more powerfull, until computing is "pervasive"
    like intel's vision of "quantum computers in a
    ring". So, who needs a brain dead OS when the
    hardware is becoming powerfull enough to run
    anything we want.

    -Dave

  180. IBM always comes up with cool gadgets by Lordrashmi · · Score: 1

    IBM always seems to come up with cool devices that might or might not be useful.

    They have a device you can wear on your shoulder and when you shake someones hand, if they have the same device, it transfers your business card information THROUGH your arm. It would be used at tradeshows, etc.

    There are many other devices but I forgot all the specific. Bottom line is, IBM has more R&D ppl then god and they are constantly turn out new ideas and products. This watch sounds cool, but the microdrive will be a more useful product.

    --LordRashmi
    Im to lazy to make a sig...
  181. Linux Journal had it... by andri · · Score: 1

    There was a picture of a Linux wrist watch on the cover of July 2000 issue of Linux Journal. There was also a technical arcticle explaining what exactly the wristwatch was.

  182. Look, my watch has four buttons, by bob_jordan · · Score: 1

    D, A, T and E.

    Bob.

  183. Is it just me... by Carnage4Life · · Score: 2

    ..or is there's no time displayed on the watch?

    So instead of glancing at my watch to tell the time do I have to somehow call date on the command line?
    FOOD FOR THOUGHT

  184. Re:looks like a dial by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

    it looks like a dial to me, not a microphone. Perhaps you dial through the letters, hit a button to go to the next spot, and dial some more.

  185. Only good until 2038 by drivers · · Score: 2

    This watch should only be good until 2038... :)

  186. Nonono, it goes like this... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3

    "Excuse me, do you have the time?

    "Yeah, sure. It's..."
    [root@localhost]# time
    0.0u 0.0s 0:00 5% 0+388k 0+0io 0pf+0w


    "Oh $#!&@!"

    [root@localhost]# date
    Mon Aug 7 17:50:22 UDT 2000
    "Uh, it's 17:50... which I think is 3:50 PM, oh shit... then you need to subtract the difference between Pacific Time and Universal Mean Time, which is.... wait. Is it Daylight savings? Oh, ok... then you subtract 8 hours from Universal time, which means it's 7:50 AM... yes. It's 7:50 AM, ma'am!"

    "Uh, thanks..." (slowly backs away)

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  187. Cute? Hah! by 11223 · · Score: 1

    Only a true geek with no social life would think that a watch like that is Cute. It's a sad, sad, statement upon our society when people think that a watch is Cute just becuase it has a computer in it - nevermind the fact that it's ugly and doesn't tell time! If you want a really cute watch, go here.

  188. Re:die by b0z · · Score: 1
    Hiya.

    Actually I can see a reason for making a watch like this. Ever see the movie "Dick Tracy?" He had smll watch that he could talk to people through, and it did other stuff too. So, if you meet a girl that happens to be a impressed by things like that, and her name is Tracy...it improves your chances. Oh wait, that's not it. Um, I think the excuse IBM probably used was something more to the effect of: "We wanted to make a small enough O.S. distribution and hardware that we could fit onto a small piece of equipment, much as we would with any embedded system that needed a full O.S. on it. We used a wristwatch sized computer so we would be able to demonstrate how small the computer and OS is to non-computer users to be amazed at."

    In other words...they thought it would be 31337 to have linux watch. Just wait until it comes with a cover on the top in the shape of Tux and have it interface with the pokemon watch.

    --
    Mas vale cholo, que mal acompañado.
  189. Casio's monopoly _must_ be broken! by tenzig_112 · · Score: 2

    Let us gather together and rise up against the evil thick techno-watch monopoly, Casio! Damn you and your 80's synth watch complete with Samba _and_ samba2!!

    Today on the rid: Napster in the Crapster

    ridiculopathy.com

  190. Themes by Dungeon+Dweller · · Score: 2

    The newest site on themes.org.

    Watch.themes.org

    hehehe :-)

    --
    Eh...