Slashdot Mirror


Egghead Customer? Your Data Goes To Fry's

An anonymous reader says: "I bought some things from onsale.com, which then became egghead.com. Somewhere in that time, their credit card database got jacked, for which they sent me a nice e-mail saying everything was ok. Now I've got a mail that I don't like at all, with the subject 'IMPORTANT MESSAGE REGARDING THE TRANSFER OF YOUR CUSTOMER INFORMATION.' Well. that's pretty much it. egghead.com info will go to Fry's Electronics, unless the customer explicitly requests that it not. How often does it happen that when a company goes under that they just sell their customer info and just not tell anyone?" Here are links to the Egghead info page and privacy and security policy.

213 comments

  1. The big question is... by caseydk · · Score: 3, Funny

    So who owns Fry's? Is it Disney or MS or AOL-TW?

    1. Re:The big question is... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1
    2. Re:The big question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a closely and privatly held company.

    3. Re:The big question is... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Fry's seems fine, and I wish there were one near me, but I told Egghead to opt me out because I don't know what info they want to pass along. When I want to give my credit card number to Fry's then I will do so.

  2. Right to privacy by martij2 · · Score: 1

    It seems way to often. The question is, does choosing to purchase at mean you simply choose who you hand over you right to privacy? (Don't flame me, it's a legit question.)

  3. silver linings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least egghead is telling its customers, and giving them an opportunity to block it.

  4. You should be happy by BigumD · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    Most companies that go under just sell the information outright. At least you got an opt out. I don't agree with them selling it at all, but again, at least there is an option...

    --
    --The space between my ears was intentionally left blank--
    1. Re:You should be happy by fiendracer · · Score: 1

      True, they did give the option of an opt out.

      But big deal if it doesn't work, as it did in my case.

      Just like all those other "click here to remove from our mailing list" fiascos. Now my address is somewhere else floating about...

      gunnar.

    2. Re:You should be happy by joe52 · · Score: 1

      I got that email and the opt-out mechanism sucked. It asks for a username. I haven't bought anything from them in about 3 years. I have no idea what my username was. The form is also submitted via email. I no longer have the ability to send email using the old address that they have on file. I'm not about to send it with one of my more current addresses.

      I guess I'll be trying the 800 number that they gave on Monday. At least they gave one, though I wonder how hard it will be to get through.

  5. No... by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    They didn't sell customer information and not tell anybody. If you'll read what you wrote, you'll notice they sent you an email telling you they were doing it unless you asked them not to. Not that that excuses their selling of customer info in the slightest, but at least get your facts lined up.

    -Legion

    1. Re:No... by ziplux · · Score: 1

      I think they're wondering how often companies that are going under don't tell their customers about selling the info and a way to opt out.

    2. Re:No... by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      I really don't see anything wrong with them selling customer information as long as they give the customer sufficient opportunity to opt out as egghead is doing. The information is an important part of the business. Part of the sales agreement requires Fry's (or whoever bids highest) to adhear to the same privacy agreement the customer agreed to. I applaud egghead for doing this the right way. I remember when they discovered their server had been compromised a while back. I was e-mailed by them explaining what happened and then my bank called explaining what happened and gave me the option of deactivating my credit card and getting a new one.

  6. Not Too Long Ago... by Whyte+Wolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was a similar case where the company went into recievership and the reciever sold off client information as an asset of the company. I can't remember the details, but it was a real big stink here on /. and elsewhere.

    In this day and age of information though, information is an asset. Yours and likely an asset of any company you provide it to. Remember, you're not being made to give out your personal info, you're providing it in exchange (along with money sometimes) for a service.

    --

    Beware the Whyte Wolf.

    With a gun barrel between your teeth, you speak only in vowels...

    1. Re:Not Too Long Ago... by wallsg · · Score: 1

      In this day and age of information though, information is an asset. Yours and likely an asset of any company you provide it to. Remember, you're not being made to give out your personal info, you're providing it in exchange (along with money sometimes) for a service

      I find it amusing that the people objecting to the spread of this information are the same ones who say "Information wants to be free!"

  7. I got this email also by eap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My personal info was stolen some time back and was used fraudulently to purchase some items at egghead.com

    I tried the link to opt out, but you have to have a user id and password to do this! I don't have them because the criminal who stole my CC created them.

    As a result, there is no way for me to get them to remove my personal info, which wasn't supposed to be in their database in the first place!

    Egghead.com was also cracked about a year or so ago. They have a very poor track record of safeguarding their customers' information.

    Things like this make me want stricter privacy controls for personal information.

    1. Re:I got this email also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once bought something from them, and just recieved this notification. But since I never intended to buy anything there again, I did not record my user name and so cannot get off their list.

      California's privacy protection bill is probably not going to pass, too bad since it would have made this sort of action illegal.

    2. Re:I got this email also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My credit card info was stolen a couple of years ago. The only online company I had given this info to was Egghead/Onsale. I sent them an e-mail to let them know what had happened. Never even got a reply. Sent another in case the first got lost. Same result. Total indifference. Never bought there again.

    3. Re:I got this email also by ziplux · · Score: 1

      Ever conisder the possibility that someone stole it in, gasp, the Real World (TM)? Or maybe someone generated a random number and they happened to get yours? Remember, there were credit card fraud problems long before the eCommerce. Plus, what's the big deal anyway? All you have to do is call up your credit card company and have them reverse the fraudlent charges, that's one of the Wonders of Credit Cards.

    4. Re:I got this email also by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      There are 16 digits in your average Mastercard. (More in Amex, less in Visa). With 16 digits, there are 1,000,000,000,000,000 possible different numbers (give or take an order of magnitude).
      There are 100,000,000 people in the USA (again, give or take an order of magnitude).
      What are the odds that a randomly generated number is a real one?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    5. Re:I got this email also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those 16 digits are check digits?

    6. Re:I got this email also by bjsvec · · Score: 1

      I don't know the answer to your question, but a couple of things to keep in mind are that all CC numbers i've ever seen start with 3,4,5 or 6. Also, I know there is an algorithm that the banks use to generate the numbers so that they are not easily miskeyed and so that people's numbers are not 'one off' each other. I've seen a program on some cracker sites that will generate lists of "valid" CC numbers with this algorithm.

      Anyhow, besides the CC# one generally would need expiration date, bank name, billing address, etc to do anything with it...

    7. Re:I got this email also by essell · · Score: 1

      Given that CC numbers must follow a specifical algorithm, and assuming a person generating a card number is starting with a specific digit (4 for visa, as an example), the ratio is greatly reduced, and this situation is entirely feasable. No, not all randomly generating 16 digit numbers matches a credit credit.. there is an algorithm.

      --
      i swear my userid used to be lower.
    8. Re:I got this email also by eap · · Score: 5, Informative
      There are 16 digits in your average Mastercard. (More in Amex, less in Visa). With 16 digits, there are 1,000,000,000,000,000 possible different numbers (give or take an order of magnitude). There are 100,000,000 people in the USA (again, give or take an order of magnitude). What are the odds that a randomly generated number is a real one?
      You have apparently never purchased anything over the phone. In addition to the credit card number, you must also supply an expiration date and at least a billing address zip code (sometimes street address).

      Let's see:

      (1^15 credit card numbers) * (1^5 zip codes) * (roughly 48 expiration dates over a 4 year card life) = NO CHANCE IN HELL OF GUESSING IT RANDOMLY

    9. Re:I got this email also by caseydk · · Score: 1
      well, i've ordered gifts for friends and family over the phone and then, all of the sudden, the billing address isn't nearly as important... made me nervous

      that's why i use exactly ONE card online with an incredibly low limit... then, just in case someone does get it, they can't try to wipe me or any business out...

    10. Re:I got this email also by dogbowl · · Score: 1

      You have apparently never built a credit card processing app.
      All you need to charge someones credit card is the number. There is no verification of the exp date, name, street address, etc.

      --

      These pretzels are making me thirsty.
    11. Re:I got this email also by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      What are the odds that a randomly generated number is a real one?

      Pretty good. most credit card generators generate only valid numbers. There's no real reason to try, though, as it's so easy to steal them. Next time you go buy gas, see if somebody has left their receipt lying around or tossed it in the can.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    12. Re:I got this email also by eap · · Score: 1
      You have apparently never built a credit card processing app. All you need to charge someones credit card is the number. There is no verification of the exp date, name, street address, etc.
      Actually, I have. Also, I know for a fact that Egghead required the expiration date AND the billing address in order to complete the transaction. That is how they were able to notify me that the thieves had attempted to use my card, since the shipping address did not match my billing address.
    13. Re:I got this email also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it would be easy enough.

      After all, 1^15 == 1, as does 1^5. So the chances would be 1 in 48.

      Oh, you mean 10^15?

      Then that's gonna be a bitch.

    14. Re:I got this email also by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Several years ago I wrote a little subroutine (in BASIC, no less) to verify credit card numbers for an order-processing application that I was creating. Credit cards contain a check digit and that can be used to verify that a number has been correctly entered. Or I suppose one could generate "valid" credit card numbers by using the algorithm the other way around; "valid" in that the check digit would match anyway.

      I'm sure that I have that algorithm laying about somewhere still...

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    15. Re:I got this email also by gorilla · · Score: 2

      Credit card numbers are unique throughout the world. In other words, if you have a credit card issued by a British bank, you can be 100% sure that it does not have the same number as a credit card issued by an American bank. The way they ensure this is that the first 2-4 digits indicate the issuing authority.

  8. Nothing to see here. Move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Egghead is warning you a priori
    2. You can opt-out
    3. If you don't opt-out, Fry's (or whoever actually ends up as top bidder) will still be bound by the original privacy agreement you agreed to
    4. what more do you want from them? $100 and a blowjob?
    1. Re:Nothing to see here. Move along. by ziplux · · Score: 1

      Heh, well put.

    2. Re:Nothing to see here. Move along. by Scutter · · Score: 1

      They give out blowjobs? How come I missed that in their catalog?

      FP

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:Nothing to see here. Move along. by Rix · · Score: 1

      what more do you want from them? $100 and a blowjob?

      I want them to leave me the fuck alone. I want them to stop acting as if they had the right to collect, and keep, information about me.

      There are laws protecting us from unscrupulous doctors, lawyers, and bankers who would do these things, perhaps we need to expand this to every business type.

    4. Re:Nothing to see here. Move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't opt out.. when their danm mailbox bounces mail back because it's full. bunch of shit if you ask me.

  9. No way things can change... by Nawak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...since privacy helps terrorists.

    --
    A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
    1. Re:No way things can change... by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly, we should opensource all Terrorist movements.

      -
      GPL isnt only for software anymore!

    2. Re:No way things can change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard of FreeCell?

    3. Re:No way things can change... by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Troll eh, was a joke, glad I didnt GNU/terrorist.

  10. Egghead/Onsale. by proxima · · Score: 2

    I used to purchase things from Onsale's auction site all of the time, including my refurbished laptop 4 years ago. They had excellent selection, and if you could find what you wanted you could usually get it cheaper than anywhere else. I also bought my new digital camera from Onsale's auction site.

    Then Egghead purchased Onsale. At first Egghead did a decent job of keeping up the auctions, even imitating Onsale's not-so-hot web page design. Over the past year or two, the auctions have really fizzled - you can hardly find anything worth bidding on.

    Then there was the incident where the credit card database was cracked. This did not make any Egghead customers very happy. Add to that the fact that many of their retail items were either overpriced or out of stock, the site quickly went to the bottom of the list from which I purchase computer equipment.

    I am not saddened to see the company go under - they brought it upon themselves.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Egghead/Onsale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit it was cracked. They run IIS. I smell a W0rm. Its name is CodeRed. Stupid monkeys don't know anymore than how to point & click.

  11. Customer Information is an Asset by Ranger · · Score: 1

    Customer info is one of the primary assets a business has to sell. If I were in a position to buy an existing business, I would require the customer list as part of the deal. What would be bad is if the company was just selling the info to any Tom, Dick, or Harry that wanted it.

    Just having the customer info is no guarantee of customer loyalty or repeat business. As long as it's only going to the successor company, I don't have a problem with it, but they will have to work to retain my business.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Customer Information is an Asset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm very happy this is illegal in Germany, where I live. (We have some quite heavy personal data protection laws). And is it SO bad for companies being sold to send a letter to all their customers "we are selling to another company"?

      My travel agency was recently bought by another one, meaning they had to throw away their customer database (although practically nothing much but the name of the company has changed - same employees, same computers...) but gave slight fare reductions for old customers who would come back.

      OPT-IN is the way to go!

    2. Re:Customer Information is an Asset by LoserPlatz · · Score: 1

      I don't know this for a fact but it is my understanding. If you have a contract with company A, it is valid for anyone who buys assets from Co. A, including that contract. If it's not a contract, forget it.

  12. Go Under? Hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a company doesn't even have to "go under" for them to sell your customer information. Companies clean out the dead-beat and non-repeat customer lists by selling the information off to debt and customer information clearing houses on a regular basis.

    Jesus... when are you privacy freaks going to *wake*up*and*smell*the*coffee?

  13. Canadian policy regarding info transfer by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Canadians have introduced bills to prevent this from happening. The company must ask your explicit permission or else both companies will be held accountable. This also leaves the door open for the good old fashioned class action lawsuit
    I'm just not sure if this was passed already or not. I guess I should find out, being Canadian and all.

    Angry White Guy

    --Consience is a hinderance only afforded by the common man

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    1. Re:Canadian policy regarding info transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?
      My Bank of Montreal bank account AND BMO Mastercard data was sold to TD Visa.

      Imagine my surprise when a telemarketer of East Indian descent that could barely speak English called me up to verify my personal financial information, and that a Visa credit card was already created for me using this information.

    2. Re:Canadian policy regarding info transfer by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 0

      There were no provisions made for data readily available before the bill. I receive pre-approved credit cards from TD almost weekly, since I entered the workforce. If they had recent information, I'd never receive a single solicitation.

      Angry White Guy

      Nobody said the government was perfect, unless it was them.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    3. Re:Canadian policy regarding info transfer by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 0

      I found the link!
      Electronic fronteir Canada[www.efc.ca]
      The legislation states:
      Jan 2001: Government agencies must follow the rules
      Jan 2002:Health related info (Medical records, etc)
      Jan 2004: All businesses must follow
      Sorry about the confusion.

      Angry White Guy

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    4. Re:Canadian policy regarding info transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's available here:
      http://www.parliment.qu.ca/draft_index/010101Prido cu.html .Translated from french, thanks to google.

    5. Re:Canadian policy regarding info transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      back when the graham-leach-bliley (opt out) act was still in congress, consumer advocates attempted to get an opt-in procedure, meaning that people would have to expressly request that their information be shared. it was turned down, however, so the burden lies with the consumer to protect their own information. this means conatacting all credit card companies etc, and telling them to opt them out.

  14. Customer Data by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    You can't stop the sale of customer data unless your a majority stock holder. Stock holders want to make their money back, and customer data is a tasty sale. To protect their butts they normally have a privacy contracts with "We reserve the right to modify or change, blah blah at any time."

    We don't have as much privacy you expect, credit card companies, insurance companies, banks, etc, exchange data without your permission, due to fraud and credit reporting. Even with government databases, they love selling drivers license information to companies.

    1. Re:Customer Data by coli2 · · Score: 1

      If you the majority stock holder, you won't want to stop the sale of privacy. Because as you said, it's all about profits... So in the end, privacy will be lost under this system...

    2. Re:Customer Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. There is a such thing as "goodwill" as a factor in the worth of a company.

    3. Re:Customer Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, credit cards. If you want to be private, never engage in any sort of credit because the minute you do that company knows _everything_ about you, stuff you didn't even tell them. I work at JP Morgan Chase and let me tell you, when we think about suing someone because they won't pay thier credit card debt, we want to know everything. First we pull your credit report, find out who you owe money, how much you owe them, how much you car loan was and who you got it from. Oh you have a mortgage? Great, that gives us something to go after. Then we pull of First Pursuit, find where you live, who lives in your house, where you work, where everyone in your house works. We pull up who your neighbors are and what year, make and model of car you drive. There's two ways to look at this, either don't get a credit card from chase, or pay your damn bills. Oh, and never fill out the "optional surveys" in magazines or anywhere else.

  15. the changes that will take place in info by perdida · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whether the data goes to Fry's or elsewhere, most data generated by virtual processes, and all other electronic transactions, will be used in ensuring security. This is especially likely due to Tuesday's tragedy.

    Information's nature will change soon.

    On NPR today, someone was explaining the use of electronic information as a possible alternative to ethnic, cultural, or social profiling of airplane passengers and other people who frequent public places.

    The security officials would use credit-card data, bill and purchase data, phone records, and bank data in order to verify that you have an established address, haven't moved around too much or done anything that provokes suspicion.

    In effect, we will all have different "clearance levels" in regular civilian society, which will decide for us whether we are stopped, interviewed, strip searched; what our freedom of movement and consumer activity will be; and what kinds of security-vital private sector training, such as computer or pilot skills, that we can enjoy.

    1. Re:the changes that will take place in info by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Something like this might just pass congress 'Really, its a good idea' while people are freaking.

      Start a national database with information from DMV, Telephone, Bank, Credit Card, IRS.

      Put security clearances on peoples ID. And heck, You can already be detained if you dont have an ID.

      -
      You must be CCL 3 to fly this flight.

    2. Re:the changes that will take place in info by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I wrote an essay about this. While I have been told it does not address issues such as "Civilian Clearance Levels" and I use gun control as my example it can be nearly any freedom. Encyrption, Right not to be stripped searched, etc.

      Anyhow

      Jeremy

    3. Re:the changes that will take place in info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh. no you cannot be detained for refusing to provide identification to an officer

    4. Re:the changes that will take place in info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time a cop asks for your i.d. tell him to fuck off and see what happens.

    5. Re:the changes that will take place in info by swillden · · Score: 1

      Next time a cop asks for your i.d. tell him to fuck off and see what happens.

      A better idea: Next time a cop asks for your ID, politely refuse to provide it, and see what happens: Unless you're driving and he's asking for your driver's license, or unless he's already caught you breaking the law, nothing at all will happen.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  16. Fry'd Electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a sad, yet foreseen event. When egghead's db got cracked back around xmas, we were immediately on the phone with the cc company and to my surprize they had actually heard about it, and were able to ditch the account and send us a completely new cc while transfering the account to it at no charge. With this news (I got the email too.. onsale.com sucks, it's all about to start sucking a lot more!) I am glad I'm paranoid at times, for now we don't have to worry about getting Fry'd in that fashion.

  17. European Union rules by Animats · · Score: 2

    I've been wondering if an E-mail forwarding account within the European Union would be worthwhile, so that the European Directive on Data Privacy would apply.

    1. Re:European Union rules by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      The European Directive on Data Privacy is only effective against corporations with reasonably significant financial resources inside the jurisdiction of the European Union; for example, Siemens. I haven't read it recently, but from what I remember, it wouldn't allow a claim of jurisdiction simply based on the location of an e-mail server.

      Move to the EU: then you'll get its protection.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  18. Account problems by doorbot.com · · Score: 2

    I haven't purchased from Egghead (formerly Onsale) in a long time. In fact, at the least, I have ordered since their "hacker breaking" a while back.

    After I got the "we're selling you to Fry's" email I decided to opt-out but it wouldn't accept my username and password, nor could I recover my password (via their website). I thought maybe my username was incorrect, but as far as I can tell that is not the case.

    I'm wondering if my case is unique. I'm also wondering why I need a user name to opt-out. Why isn't my email enough? If I have that email setup for multiple users, then I can opt-out of all at once. I'm going to call customer support as well, but that will have to wait until Monday (thanks for the email Saturday, so that way hopefully I'll forget to opt-out by Monday).

    Of course, I'm assuming that their website is actually working properly. I have order numbers and tracking numbers for previous orders, perhaps I should just email those en masse to customer support and let them deal with it.

  19. Re:I got this email also (TOLL FREE #) by eclecticIO · · Score: 1

    I too received this email, went to the page to opt out, and had trouble doing so. However, if you keep reading the page they also give a toll free number to call in case you have trouble using the web page.

    The number is 1-800-EGGHEAD (Mon - Fri 7AM - 5PM PST).

  20. Is Fry's even online? by shoppa · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's been a couple of years since I last was in an area that was served by Fry's, but at that time they had no online presence. In fact, they sued a guy who did them the service of putting their newspaper ads online.

    Why would Fry's not have any online presence? The obvious answer is that there is nobody in the organization who has the competence to do so.

    I would submit that Fry's is not only unaware of the security issues related to "personal data", but guaranteed to screw it up.

    1. Re:Is Fry's even online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I could be wrong, and this could already be posted... but

      Yes, Fry's has a web site (frys.com) but no online store. They bought up outpost.com and egghead.com. It seems logical that now they have an online store. Why reinvent the wheel when you can buy a company in the toilet instead?
      With that in mind, I don't see the big deal about the customer database. It's Egghead.com -> Frys.com now. They didn't sell it for the assets, they were bought out.

    2. Re:Is Fry's even online? by TrentC · · Score: 2

      Why would Fry's not have any online presence? The obvious answer is that there is nobody in the organization who has the competence to do so.

      No, it means that for whatever reason, Fry's has chosen not to have an online presence; it's not like they can't find someone to design a website -- it seems to me that competent (or even half-competent) web designers are a dime a dozen, esp. with the dotcom implosion.

      Fry's doesn't let its reach exceed its grasp. When Fry's opens a store, it already owns the property, building and inventory outright -- as in, they don't take out loans to start stores, so there's no rush to profitability in order to cover loan payments.

      I would submit that Fry's is not only unaware of the security issues related to "personal data", but guaranteed to screw it up.

      Actually, as a Fry's employee, I can tell you that our customer database isn't all it's cracked up to be as it is. I've worked returns, where we have the ability to pull up information on a transcation even if you don't have your receipt (the receipt helps things immensely, though) by CC number, bank account number (if a check was used), customer number, etc.

      When I think of the number of people who have multiple customer numbers that come up when I do a search based on method of payment (so far as I can tell, the cashiers don't bother to look up a customer, they just create a new entry), I'd have to imagine that our database is about as valuable a resource for customer profiling as Hotmail's is...

      Jay (=

  21. This is why I don't buy stuff on-line. by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 2

    It's for this exact reason that I'm yet to purchase anything from a web site, save for my now non-existant domain name. I'm not saying that nobody should buy anything on the Internet, or that it's a bad thing to begin with.

    But lets face it. Even now, after the "dot bust" or whatever it is called today, there still are sites that are getting hacked, Internet companies that are going bankrupt, etc. And everytime that happenes, my personal information is in danger of becoming public, or that it falls into the wrong hands.

    I know dozens of people, some of them my friends, who have had their credit card numbers stolen. My best friend lost $400 on his VISA, and if it wouldn't have been for the fraud protection, he would be in a deep hole right now (we're students, we're not rich people). Losing money is the worst thing that can happen, but what about the little things? I'm getting 10-15 spam emails a day, and this is after some pretty drastic filters. But I know people who keep getting them in the hundreds. (I went on a trip this summer for a monts, and I had about 600 new messages). And there are many more reasons...

    And to top it all off, these companies are treating the information that you give them as something to sell. WHEN IT'S NOT EVEN THEIRS TO BEGIN WITH!!!!!!!!!!!! It's MY credit card number, it's MY name, MY address, MY age that I inputed into their database. And yet they sell it off!

    Don't get me wrong, I love the ideea of going on-line and shopping with GrogeryGateay.com, or buying anything, ordering any services online. But I'm definitely not going to do it untill I'm certain that my info and my money are safe. And ATM, no matter what anybody will say, they're not!

    1. Re:This is why I don't buy stuff on-line. by hattig · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The sad thing is, companies store CC information openly on servers (whether in a DB or in a file). They claim a secure site, but they are lying (misleading the consumer - an illegal activity in most countries I believe) because the whole process (customer to delivery) is not secure, only the customer to website part is.

      Sadly, even simple, 10 minute code jobs like PGP encrypting the customer's payment details before storing them on the server are beyond most online sites. And that is very sad. My company PGP encrypts all online payments before saving them on the server, and they are only decrypted on a computer that is not connected to the Internet (even though this is not as easy as getting an email with all the details in plain text (which other sites do after the https part of the deal anyway!)). After processing, the details are deleted.

      SPAM has got much worse this year. Last year I got very few, this year I also get 10 or so a day on my personal email account, despite always having it spam-proofed one way or another. Action needs to be taken against spammers.

      Anyway, the companies T&Cs will give them the right to sell on the information you provide if they so desire.

    2. Re:This is why I don't buy stuff on-line. by aozilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's for this exact reason that I'm yet to purchase anything from a web site, save for my now non-existant domain name.


      Oh c'mon. Do you think that your credit card numbers are safe when you buy something offline? Do you think offline companies don't sell your information? There's no difference, it all depends on the specific security and privacy policies of the company, not whether the company is online or offline.


      My best friend lost $400 on his VISA, and if it wouldn't have been for the fraud protection, he would be in a deep hole right now (we're students, we're not rich people).


      But there is fraud protection. If they don't have a signiture or other proof that you authorized the purchase, they can't make you pay for it. Credit card numbers are merely numbers, no more.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    3. Re:This is why I don't buy stuff on-line. by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      You appear to be under the impression that non-online retailers do not keep electronic databases of credit cards, and, in the cases when they do, their databases are never broken into.

      Dot-coms aren't the only targets of credit card fraudsters, ya know. ;)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    4. Re:This is why I don't buy stuff on-line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I have a separate free email account I use for shit like ebay/amazon etc. I get spammed to hell at that address but I only use it for giving it to commercial companies. My other email account is used for corresponding with my friends, classmates, and some trusted security lists that don't give out personal info. Guess how much spam I get there? None.

  22. Privacy Act Statement of 1974 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Privacy Act Statement of 1974 it is the law. Why does everyone ignore it?

  23. I could be wrong but... by exick · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember reading a story (here on slashdot?) that Fry's was actually buying out Egghead.com not too long ago. If one company buys the assets of another, doesn't it make sense that customer data is part of that? I guess I just don't understand what all the complaining is about.

    1. Re:I could be wrong but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I read the same post & see nothing wrong with this.

  24. Re:ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually i'm going to do what so many people do. I'm going to sit back and complain about my privacy until someone i'm related to is blown up. Then i will agree we must retaliate.

  25. How often? Every second of the day. by LoudMusic · · Score: 1, Informative
    Selling databases of customer information is a very large business. So large in fact that a company by the name of Acxiom has become an international fortune 500 company doing just that. How much junk (snail) mail do you get? Chances are they house the records of your personal information and purchases you've made, when, where, how (credit card ..) and how much. They even print the billions of mailing labels every year. They also sell databases of customer information in electronic form. I'm sure this is how we all receive those thousands of wonderful emails asking us to sign up for insurance and toner.

    But they also do more respectable business. Like they used to manage Dillard's warehouse stock information. They'd kick the data around and tell them what's selling where, what to order more of, and where to ship it at what time of the year. Pretty cool stuff actually.

    ~LoudMusic

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  26. Re:ok by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 0

    At least honesty is your one saving grace.

    Angry White Guy

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  27. Keeping Them Out of Your Face by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Informative
    While you can't do much to keep companies from selling your information, you can do a fair bit to keep them out of your face. For junk snail-mailers, there are several organizations that will get your name removed from the lists (Or added to a do-not-send list) and promise to dramatically reduce if not completely eliminate the amount of junk mail you get.

    For telemarketers, finding out their company, the company they represent and the first and last name of the person you're talking to before you ask them to add you to their do-not-call list is the way to go. Log that information and sue them if they ever call you again.

    For spammers your choices are more limited, especially if you don't run your own mail server. It is next to impossible to not download spam, although you can process it in such a way that you never see it. There are two solutions I like the most. The first is to keep a whitelist of people who are allowed to send you E-Mail. You can store the E-mail of anyone who has sent you mail and isn't on the list and require them to reply to a message to get added to the white list. Purge any such stored messages after a week or so. The other alternative is to reject any E-mail that's not encrypted to your obnoxiously long encryption key. A 4096 bit key takes about 30 seconds to encrypt to for a 1 page message on a P166. No spammer's going to take the time (Nor would they be capable of taking the time, if everyone did this.)

    For internet banner ads and more obnoxious features of the web, I've found that disabling popups and animations in Mozilla makes things a lot less annoying. YMMV depending on your web browser.

    And of course, if you know a company is likely to sell your information without your permission, don't do business with them and tell them why.

    We're already constantly on the verge of information overload (or well past the verge) without some company you never heard of buying your info and jamming more advertising down your throat. Pursuing your privacy like a rabid pit-bull is the only way to avoid having this happen.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  28. Misinformation by --daz-- · · Score: 1

    Why is that when people post to Slashdot they must be so melodramatic and sensationalistic. If you look at the facts, you'll see that they have taken the time to alert their customers and give them a chance to OPT OUT of the information transfer. Please, folks, if you're going to post a story like this, please take the time to at least get MOST of the facts right, if not all.

    1. Re:Misinformation by glitch! · · Score: 1

      If you look at the facts, you'll see that they have taken the time to alert their customers

      They didn't bother to notify ME. I just found out because I read slashdot. And I have been an Onsale customer for about 4 years.

      and give them a chance to OPT OUT [egghead.com] of the information transfer.

      Their web form doesn't work. It just pops up a blank "mailto" window. I assume that "user name" also means number, because when I first started, all customers were just numbers :-)

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    2. Re:Misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an ultimately hilarious post, as I never once recieved any "opt-out" email from egghead. I did recieve the email in relation to this topic, but nothing beforehand. Perhaps I got lost in the jumble, or perhaps they are much more incompetant than I thought. But that's ok, since I've already covered my ass, and will proceed to cover my ass on demand if need be. :)

      http://gnea.net - heh

    3. Re:Misinformation by Fas+Attarac · · Score: 2

      Maybe you didn't get an e-mail because they, for whatever reason, don't have your e-mail address? If they aren't able to contact you, chances are, the company they sell this data to won't be able to contact you either. What exactly is the problem?

      If the new company *does* contact you, without warning, *then* I would be concerned...

  29. Same thing will happen with Outpost customer data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The smoking remains of Outpost.com (the gerbil ad guys) are also in the process of being bought up by Fry's. The same thing will happen to your personal data if you ever bought anything from Outpost.

    Outpost.com - what's left of the once proud e-tailer.

    And here's a story by EcommerceTimes that says that some guy at Forrester says that the only reason Fry's wants Outpost is the customer list. I believe it, there's not much else worth anything left there.

  30. Enough opt-outs, and Fry's drops the deal! by retrogmr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fry's Electronics has made it a clause of the purchase that no more than 10% of Egghead.com's customers opt-out of the mailing list.

    Check this article about it on CNet:
    http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-6962164.htm l

    1. Re:Enough opt-outs, and Fry's drops the deal! by morlos · · Score: 1
      I tried to opt-out by email but my mail was refused:
      ----- Transcript of session follows -----
      ... Deferred: Connection refused by smtp01.egghead.com.
      Message could not be delivered for 6 hours
      Message will be deleted from queue

      That's one way to keep down the opt-outs.

  31. What conditions were on the transfer of info? by ??? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The personal information was exchanged, with money for goods and/or services, with the condition that it may be used only by egghead.com, and that they may not sell it. It may be considered an asset, but it is an asset with encumbrances on its use and resale.

    1. Re:What conditions were on the transfer of info? by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      There is a long legal precedence that buying a retail business includes buying their customer records. Otherwise, things like warranty service, returns policies, maintenance of tax records, would be impossible.

      While egghead may not be able to sell the customer records as a standalone asset, selling customer records as part of the sale of the overall business is so firmly established as routine in the world of brick & mortar it would be hard to argue that it is so diffeernt for an online business.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  32. Unscribe didnt work... by ToWnSaVeR2 · · Score: 1

    Well i got there email, asked them not to sell my info. Then i got another email saying it didnt work. Anyone else have this trouble? They submit their form to an email address which i always thought was bad practice

  33. true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I worked at eggheads in la, the manager there was a convicted pedophile. he had to check in with his parole officer every month and he was always missing work. he had this computer in the back rigged up with all sorts of images of nude and semi-nude boys aged 14 and under. well anyuways one day before work we copied all these pictures onto the demo computers that were out on the show floor, and loaded them up to display in a slideshow. needless to say when my child loving boss showed up for work he freaked out like you wouldn't believe... he was probably secretly cumming in his pants at the sight of all those child dicks that sick fucker.

    anyways so we all got fired.

  34. I want my cut. by trentfoley · · Score: 1

    If they sell my data, they should send me a check!

    1. Re:I want my cut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't force you to give them your data did they? No I don't think so. By buying or registering with them I'm 100% sure you agreed to authorize them to do this. Go on with life, I'm sure you'll live.

  35. I tried by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 3, Informative

    I tried the link, but it failed.

    1. Re:I tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you failed, you big failure.

      At least you still have your healthy, non-sore hands. Oh, wait. You don't.

    2. Re:I tried by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Ditto. The damned opt-out doesn't work, at least not reliably for everyone.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:I tried by mkeller · · Score: 1

      They use a not too reliable technique for sending form data via email. From the opt out page I went to:

      <form action= 'mailto:option2@smtp02.egghead.com' method="post">

      See http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol3/form_no4.htm

    4. Re:I tried by lha2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      To which I got this response:

      http://www.1tightass.com/fast/vids/movies/r2.mpg
      ...
      ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----

      ----- Transcript of session follows -----
      ... while talking to smtp02.egghead.com.:
      >>> RCPT To:
      ... Deferred: 452 4.2.2 Mailbox full
      Warning: message still undelivered after 8 hours
      Will keep trying until message is 3 days old
      ...

  36. Re:Paranoia flashback by imadork · · Score: 2
    In effect, we will all have different "clearance levels" in regular civilian society, which will decide for us whether we are stopped, interviewed, strip searched; what our freedom of movement and consumer activity will be; and what kinds of security-vital private sector training, such as computer or pilot skills, that we can enjoy.

    Citizen Foobar! What is that you're doing? You just got off that escalator! Can't you see that's an Orange escalator? You know that you only have Red clearance, and are supposed to use the Red Rope that's hanging outside the window, over the moat with the spikes in it. What if someone with Orange clearance had needed that escalator, and had to get out of your way? Report for Termination immediately (in that Blue booth right there), and have a nice day!

  37. Looks like you got told. by grommit · · Score: 1

    I don't understand, you get an e-mail saying that they're gonna transfer your information unless you state otherwise, and then you complain that you weren't told about it. Did you get the e-mail or didn't you?

    1. Re:Looks like you got told. by medina · · Score: 1

      To clarify: In my case, I was told, but I was wondering how often things like this happen without warnings going to customers. For example, when onsale.com was bought by egghead.com, I received no such mail.

      The post about only a limited number of "opt-out" customers avoiding sale to Fry's is disturbing.

  38. Why not buy it from some Russian hacker? by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Fry's really wanted the egghead.com customer database, why didn't they just buy it from some 15 year old Russian hacker?

  39. This might seem a wee polly anna but... by motherhead · · Score: 0

    When it comes to credit card fraud, since the consumer is protected by the card issuer (or else why use the damn thing, should not the credit card companies (that have to eat the losses) be doing the most to limit or restrict this kind of data exchange? I am under the impression that AMEX has way more weight to throw around then lil' oh me. though this doesn't have any bearing on non credit card data exchanges/sales. which suck because i dont everyone knowing which porno DVDs i prefer...

  40. Uh by maxxon · · Score: 1

    What exactly did you expect to happen? Fry's bought Egghead's assets.

    --
    max
  41. Egghead opt-out not currently an option by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1, Informative

    ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----

    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
    ... while talking to smtp02.egghead.com.:
    >>> RCPT To:
    ... Deferred: 452 4.2.2 Mailbox full
    Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
    Will keep trying until message is 5 days old

    1. Re:Egghead opt-out not currently an option by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Of course slashcode stripped half of the text out of the message...

  42. I don't see what the problem is. by Synpax1 · · Score: 2
    You gave the customer information to Onsale (just as you do anywhere when you pay with a credit card). Onsale was bought by Egghead. Not surprisingly, that data when to Egghead. What did you expect them to do? Throw it away?

    Fry's electronics bought a part of Egghead (the part that had your customer data.

    The bottom line is that one company had your information in the beginning and now one company, which is a dirivative of that first company, has that same info.

    And what's the worse they can do with that information? Try to give you a good deal on a product?

    1. Re:I don't see what the problem is. by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      What did you expect them to do? Throw it away?

      The point is that we want to have a choice. If I want to give my name, addr and credit card number to the new company it takes, what, 10 minutes, max to fill out the new form.

      How long does it take to get my data out of their #@$ing system? Forever, 'cause you can't do it!

      What kind of convenience is that?

      --
      Yeah, right.
    2. Re:I don't see what the problem is. by medina · · Score: 1

      Who knows where it goes next, following your line of reasoning. What if the next people are spammers (tree-based or e-mail)? Or mailbombers? Okay, well that's extreme, but you get the idea. This is really something that the consumer should be able to prevent. We didn't give up all such rights, did we? Read the privacy statement for egghead.

    3. Re:I don't see what the problem is. by Fas+Attarac · · Score: 2

      If you had actually read the e-mails they sent out (which would make you actually involved in this topic instead of just posting on Slashdot without all of the facts), you would have read that the arrangement requires Fry's to honor the existing Egghead privacy policies. Your data will not be used in any way counter to the policies that were in place when you signed up with Egghead in the first place.

      This is just a straight transfer of data from one company's flag to another's, under the same policies and restrictions.

      Stop being melodromatic about giving up all of our rights. I really cannot believe this topic is generating this amount of negative attention. I wish more companies were as open and pro-active about their customers' privacy. There isn't much more that Egghead could have done in this case, and it's silly to expect that they would just destroy their customer lists. How is Fry's to handle things like returns, warranties, catalogs, etc., if they don't have this information?

  43. Stephen Fucking King by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I just heard some fucking sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci Fi writer Stephen fucking King was found fucking dead in his Maine home this morning. There weren't any more fucking details. I'm sure fucking everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his fucking work, there's no denying his contributions to popular fucking culture. Truly an American fucking icon.

  44. This is a good thing by Roto-Rooter+Man · · Score: 0
    I was happy to get this e-mail. I followed the link and opted out.

    I'm not sure they legally had to allow us this opportunity. The whole company is being sold to Fry's, and last time I checked, a company's assets include its customer database.

    --

    The goatse guy for president. Win one for the gaper!
  45. Re:Nothing to see here. Move along. 'Nuff said. by Tabercil · · Score: 1

    Damn... I wish I had some Karma points so I could mod this statement up... oh well, hopefully others will do so too. :)

  46. Let's see... by Coppit · · Score: 1

    First they store my credit card info when I make a purchase. Next they get hacked by a russian. Then they tell me everything's okay. Then I get a $10.80 balance adjustment from Citibank for an unauthorized transaction on my credit card. Then EggHead goes bust. Then they plan to sell my personal information. Then, to top it all off, the opt-out only works if you use a mail client that the browser recognizes. ()

    Sigh.

    1. Re:Let's see... by Fas+Attarac · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you need to upgrade or re-configure your web browser to honor your preferred e-mail client.

      Or you could just send them an e-mail (clearly you found the address) or call the provided 800 number. There are few things this company could do to make this process easier for you.

      If you have a beef with Egghead as a company, that's your business, but they are doing everything they can to do the Right Thing here, and I applaud them for it, even if they've been the subject of misfortune in the past.

  47. Is this really so bad? by bradleyjay · · Score: 0

    Really...What's so bad about selling customer information? It's a valid product for companies to sell to other companies. It helps target products to the people who are most likely to buy them. Which is really the whole point of this free world stuff, right?

    The consumer can buy what he wants to buy, and the corporation can sell what they're trying to sell.

    Personally I don't really mind this type of stuff, but that's just me. The credit card companies probably sell your info weather you buy anything or not, so as a consumer you might as well get some benefit from that sale, right?

    Just my opinion, so don't mod me down just because you disagree.

    --
    Karma...what's that? I just speak my mind.
  48. World Trade Center dead at 23 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard the sad news on talk radio. Business/trade center World Trade Center was found dead in it's lower manhatten home on sept 11th. Even if you didn't work their you probably commuted through or shopped there. Truly an american icon.

  49. proof by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    that some childish person still hasn't grown up.

    trolls can be funny. But trolls like this only sadden me that people can act this way.

    --
    Photos.
  50. FRY's Electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fry's Electronics is the worst electronics store in the world, bar none. My most recent foray was an adventure in linguistics since no one there speaks English. Their stores are poorly stocked, incompotently staffed, and customer service is atrocious. I promise you that FRY's will bungle this website and you can be damn sure your information is not safe in their hands.

    1. Re:FRY's Electronics by Dunkelzahn · · Score: 1

      Kind of adding to this... when I was living in Sunnyvale, California last year, I worked at a store called Action Computers, that was just about four blocks away from the Fry's Electronics in Sunnyvale. Often we would have customers who tried to build their own computers for the first time come in with a pile of parts, that they gave up on, and have us build us their systems. Very often, there would be one or more or all of the parts that would be defective. We would ask them if they bought their stuff at Fry's and more often enough their answer was yes. Fry's has no quality control whatsoever, and it is normal practice for them to take something that was returned as defective and place it right back up on the shelves. I could smell a class action suit against Fry's if they are as incopetent with customer information as I believe they will be. I certainly wouldn't want my information in their hands.

      --
      .
  51. we're just done the same thing by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    onf of our competitors went pop recently,

    we've bought their database (60,000 ppl)

    I will be emailing them and telling them that their details are now ours and giving them the option to not get emailed by us again and a url for our ToC.

    I might give them the option to have their db entry removed or I might not, I'm undecided but I'm paying good money for those details and the more entries we have the more likely someone will pay us to search it.

    The worst that can happen is that person is offered a job so I don't feel guilty. I believe in our service. I would hope many businesses believe they are offering something to truly benefit the client.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  52. Re:I got this email also (link) by bjsvec · · Score: 1

    Link re: CC# generator.
    http://it.asia1.com.sg/v2/specials/crime20010627_0 05.shtml

  53. opt-out... not by CrackWilding · · Score: 1

    Nice enough for them to give you an opportunity to opt out. However...

    You have to supply your username, which I don't have (I bought something from egghead about five years ago).

    There is no mechanism for retrieving said username, as far as I can tell.

    There is no one at Egghead responsible for replying to the annoyed emails sent by me and people like me.

    So that's not really much of an opt-out, is it?

    --

    Visit sunny Knowumsayin.com, home of the pork shirt.

    1. Re:opt-out... not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, here's an idea, einstein.

      how about you get up off your ass and call them or mail them a letter? they'd probably be interested to know that their email opt out service is buggy.

      then, go read about the graham-leach-bliley act and the fair credit reporting act, so that you might educate yourself on how to protect your privacy somewhat.

      then, if you don't like the way the law works, then do something about it.

    2. Re:opt-out... not by CrackWilding · · Score: 1

      If I had to write a letter every time I wanted to protect my privacy, I wouldn't have time to earn a living. Privacy should be the default, not the special route.

      --

      Visit sunny Knowumsayin.com, home of the pork shirt.

    3. Re:opt-out... not by Fas+Attarac · · Score: 2

      Agreed!

      Except I'm still kind of confused as to why this is a privacy invasion.

      How can company B handle company A's warranties, catalog preferences, refunds, replacements, pending orders, etc., if company B buys and/or merges with company A but company A destroys its own customer lists...?

      I don't understand what company A (Egghead) could have or would have done differently in this case that would cease to make this a privacy problem.

      It looks like it's just a simple transfer of customer data, kept under the same privacy policies that Egghead had. If you didn't like those privacy policies, why did you give them your information? Companies are bought out and merged all of the time. Do you really expect them to destroy their own customer records every time this happens?

      The only reason we're seeing this issue now is because Egghead did the RIGHT THING by allowing their customers to opt out prior to the transfer. This is a very noble and privacy-friendly thing to do. It would be nice if every company did this as part of its data transfers.

  54. The script didnt even work. by RobertFisher · · Score: 2

    I was in the same situation as the poster, having purchased from onsale.com almost five years ago. Since I didn't want my data from a five-year old purchase cycling on to Fry's, I tried to use their opt-out script this morning, but it wasn't even working properly.

    How convenient.

    Bob

    --
    Science, like Nature, must also be tamed, with a view turned towards its preservation.
  55. Re:Paranoia flashback by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

    Talk of a red clearance citizen using a blue termination booth is treasonous! You are undoubtably a mutant communist trying to undermine everything the Computer has done for us! Clear grounds for termination.

    --
    Trees can't go dancing
    So do them a big favor
    Pretend dancing stinks!
  56. No more than 10% of customers may opt-out... by eperlman · · Score: 1
    According to this news.com article, Fry's is requiring no moer than 10% of customers opy-out in order for the deal to go through...

    Fry's is the one everyone should be complaining about, not EggHead.

    1. Re:No more than 10% of customers may opt-out... by jpellino · · Score: 1

      At the courthouse Friday, Egghead Chief Executive Jeff Sheahan said he thinks the company can transfer the data, calling the laws surrounding such privacy statements "very fluid."

      "I think we are doing the responsible thing here. We're informing people of what we are doing," Sheahan said. "This is a very gray area of the law."

      Why, Beavis - er - Jeff - because you say it is?
      These dopes figure because they didn't SAY they wouldn't, then they simply can.
      This is about the same level as a five year old who says "but nobody told me I couldn't wash the sofa with a garden hose..."

      I thought only Fry's deserved my derision - turns out Blockhead - er - Egghead gets the same treatment.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    2. Re:No more than 10% of customers may opt-out... by --daz-- · · Score: 1

      I stopped using Egghead when I found out that they practiced the unethical business practice of billing customers before items actually shipped (i.e. on backorder, etc).

  57. This is okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The few Fry's employees who do speak English are too stupid to know what to do with the information.

  58. there is more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is more to the story. When I followed the
    link provided by e-mail to exclude my account from
    those being sold. I found that they ask for your
    account name and password that are sent over via email (w/o encryption). Such send will reveal the
    email address to the recepient, which means that
    egghead may actually stealthily creating an additional database of active email accounts for sale. I don't see why this login information has to be sent by email.

    A

  59. ordering by mail in the US.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is using a credit card the only way to order something by mail in the US? Thank god for "Postförskott" here in sweden :)

  60. Fry's sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  61. Banjaxed... by mubes · · Score: 1

    My e-mails been sat on mailq for the past four hours with the egghead.com inbox being full - don't waste your time replying yet awhile....

  62. But what if... by Polo · · Score: 2

    What if instead there was a "frequent fryer program". Would people be complaining or would they be outraged because their information wasn't merged?

    Sometimes when I'm in Fry's I wished there was a "gold member" short line. (especially in returns)

  63. Actually, the purchase was the other way around by jht · · Score: 2

    When it happened, it was more Onsale (flush with dot-com cash) that purchased the failing Egghead. It really just postponed the inevitable failure.

    Onsale's management figured Egghead had the better-known brand name, so the combined companies went ahead under the Egghead name.

    That's why the auction pages looked an awful lot like Onsale's...

    Whether we like it or not, customer information is a company asset - and when someone purchases a company they buy all the assets available. Including our information.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  64. They are purposely making it difficult by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    I also tried to opt out after receiving the e-mail today and was unable to. The form said that it had to be submitted by e-mail and tried to launch Outlook, which I don't use.

    I think that they are trying to make it difficult so that nobody is able to opt out. That way they have more data to sell to Fry's, home of the 90-day free rental!

    1. Re:They are purposely making it difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're just using a form with a "mailto:" submission URL. It's hardly their fault you can't configure your browser correctly.

  65. What's really going on... by Hi-Tech+Redneck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fry's isn't JUST buying your customer info from Egghead.com. They are BUYING Egghead.com. According to a speech given by Randy Fry (President) in Austin at the Grand Opening of the first Fry's in town a couple of weeks ago.

    He mentioned that while Fry's had never had an online presence, it was time to develop one. And he felt the best way to do that was to purchase Egghead rather than building from scratch.

    BTW, how do I know this? I was working for Fry's at the time and was able to catch this handy little tidbit...

  66. CC# are not very random at all by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Credit card numbers are not as random as you might think. A good overview can be found at this site.

    1. Re:CC# are not very random at all by Jetson · · Score: 1

      The numbers are even less random than that site would indicate. For example, it lists the VISA prefix number as "4". Well, yes, all VISA cards start with the number 4. But anyone who has ever seen more than a few numbers will know that the second through 4th digits are also predictable as they indicate the issuing bank, type of card (regular, gold, platinum, airmiles, points, business vs. personal), etc. There are actually only 11 digits in the "random" part of the card. The trick for a criminal is to pick the 4-digit prefix having the largest number of issued cards to maximize the probability of a match. Alternatively, the high-stakes forger would go for the prestige prefixes since a successful match will have a credit limit that is an order of magnitude greater than the entry-level card. As a general rule, however, I believe most fraud artists simply copy numbers from receipts.

  67. Have YOU tried to opt out? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    2. You can opt-out

    NO YOU CAN'T.

    I tried after getting the e-mail and it didn't work for me. So erase #2 from your list. Points 1,3, and 4 are still valid. And I'll settle for just the $100, thanks.

    1. Re:Have YOU tried to opt out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have your blowjob, please?

    2. Re:Have YOU tried to opt out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you mean is *you* were unable to complete their simple opt-out procedure.

      No need to get all snitty because *you* cannot manage to follow a simple procedure, dude.

      I followed it. It worked. I opted out.

      Maybe you should get an adult to try for you?

  68. Didn't work for me either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to be incompatible with my e-mail client. I can't think of any reason to have a form submit directly to an e-mail address; I mean, c'mon, how hard is it to install FormMail? ;-)

  69. But is Fry's competent enough to use it? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    Anyone who has ever experienced the joy of shopping at Fry's knows that there isn't a single person employed by the company that is capable of making use of this data. I love the store, it is a geek warehouse, but don't expect any help. The only thing faster than their employee turnover rate is how quickly their employees will run from you if you have a question.

    They have how many stores in silicon valley and how long did it take them to have a web presence? For the longest time any search for "Fry's Electronics" would just bring up pages flaming them. I seriously doubt that they have the know-how to make use of this data.

  70. It needs to said... by matthewg · · Score: 1, Redundant

    All your data are belong to Fry!

    1. Re:It needs to said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still doing this? This is *soooo* last year. Can you come up with something more original next time? TIA.

  71. Cash by yusing · · Score: 1
    If you walk into a store and buy with cash, there is no customer information to be sold. No signature, no wait for verification, no record at the bank, no risk of employee theft.


    Cash... enjoy the retro.

    --

    "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

  72. spamfromegghead@mydomain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've turned off the address spamfromegghead@mydomain long ago. As for junk snail-mail, I like it, it lets me know whether or not the mail carrier has been here yet.

  73. Anti-consumer technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Egghead.com e-mail links to a page using an archaic "mailto:" form that is inconvenient at best and just plain won't work with many browser setups. Do a "View Source" on this page:

    http://www.egghead.com/ShowPage.dll?page=b_1_opt _p

    Plenty of 12-year-olds could have set up a better system. Obviously so could Egghead, if they had wanted to.

    A true cynic might accuse Egghead of using the recent tragedies as cover to sneak this anti-consumer tactic under the media radar. I say we all call 1-800-EGGHEAD on Monday morning, then follow up to the FTC and applicable state attorneys general, especially for those who live in states where Fry's has a brick-and-mortar presence.

  74. Onsale has always been a bunch of slimeballs... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    I remember when they first got started...they trawled eBay for email addresses and proceeded to spam everybody. You don't get much lower on the food chain than that.

    At that point, I vowed to never buy a thing from Onsale. I've done just fine without them (their prices usually weren't all that great anyway...ditto for Egghead), and it's somewhat comforting that their "bad karma" is about to catch up with them.

    (eBay long ago fixed its system to make what Onsale did nearly impossible...you can still retrieve other users' email addresses, but you have to be logged in to do that, and I suspect that all address requests are logged. A bot trawling for addresses now would stick out like a sore thumb.)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  75. Why is this wrong? by Cirrius · · Score: 1

    Fry's OWNS Egghead.com
    So how is it wrong for Fry's to see the data that they own?

    I see it as a positive action that they are even saying anything at all and giving an opt-out, instead of just using the data that became theirs when they purchased Egghead.

    It would be like complaining about my supervisor showing my personal information to his superior, because he didn't say "NO" to his boss.

    1. Re:Why is this wrong? by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      An interesting point. They own the company, they own the data, end of story, right?

      My objection here is that many (most? all?) of these people did business with Egghead when it wasn't owned by Fry's. My personal information is not something I want bought and sold with company takeovers. Maybe I don't like Fry's, and maybe I don't want them to know anything about me.

      The problem is that ultimately the information you divulge to a very select few companies of your choosing will become common knowledge to the marketing departments of _all_ companies. A buys B who reformulates it into D, and then branches off E to F, who is bought by G. Suddenly A, D, E, and G are the four major companies out there, and they ALL have YOUR information, just because you dealt with A at one point.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  76. I agree.. time to opt out though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never actually bought anything from the Egghead side of the store, it was always for the Onsale auctions. Over the last 6 months though the auctions have become really pathetic and only carry a tiny handful of items anymore and most of those are tagged as "buy now" rather than have bids open. Now if you go there and "list all items" for bid there are only 161. Pathetic! No wonder they're going out of business. Ah well, I guess I'll opt out of them selling my info... I doubt Frys is going to bring the auctions back and I can find things a LOT cheaper by searching on Pricewatch anyway.

  77. Egghead.com by DeadPrez · · Score: 1

    My bank (Washington Mutual) issued me a new CC# after egghead was hacked even though egghead claimed no CCs were stolen. I highly suggest getting a new CC#.

  78. has anyone seen their website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it looks like something that should be on geocities. http://www.frys.com

    1. Re:has anyone seen their website? by Goku19 · · Score: 1

      what do you expect. they run a 233MHz dos server. the server crash atleast 5-6 times a month.

  79. Frys/Egghead Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When egghead.com went under, Fry's electronics purchased the the assets/inventory of egghead, which probably included customer information.

  80. I used to work for Satan........I mean Fry's by Goku19 · · Score: 1

    Fry's Electronics is one of the worst electronic stores i have ever seen. Everything has been returned. All the product are openbox. They purchase refurbished products to save a buck and mark the price up about 30-60 percent. The return policy is a joke. No proof of purchase, fine we'll take it back. Its broken, sure we can still sell it. I urge you for the love of god not to buy from Fry's. You will thank me in the long run. They don't value the customer or the employee. The care about how much money they will make. I worked security for them, i know how they work.

  81. Opt-In v. Opt-Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, I should have to OPT-IN for any use of MY information that doesn't specifically relate to the completion of the order(s) in question.

    That said, when I first heard about the potential sale of Egghead.morons.com to Frys I hit the Egghead site and looked for the way to make certain that my information was not going to be transferred...

    Years before, OnSale screwed me on an auction win by trying to jack up the shipping charges, and I chose to be removed from their DB's... They said at that time, that I was removed...

    When I called Egghead a few months ago, I was still in their DB!!!!! But after a brief chat, the customer svc rep said she'd remove me from the list of customers being Xfered to Frys...

    Today I get that wonderfully useless email saying that I have to opt-out! Huh? I thought I was removed already (twice). But given that most cust service reps are complete and utter imbeciles (YMMV), I hit the link and entered my info again...

    But it didn't appear to do anything... Disable WebWasher, reload page, try again... Same response (just like the times I called!).

    Dig into the source and find an email address that the form is submitted to:

    option2@smtp02.egghead.com

    Dig out the field names, etc. and concoct a message to the geniuses at Egghead to OPT OUT of this crap for oh, I don't know, the FIFTH time?

    Try calling them, but they don't work on saturdays (another wonder why they haven't gone out of business long before now...)

    This situation is precisely the reason why I ought to have to OPT-IN for these transfers... I wouldn't have had to do a damn thing. Let them work if they want to make money off of my name!

    I don't ever recall giving them any permission for anything other than sending me some auction item I bid on...

    These companies have got to learn that they need to ASK first.

  82. Going to Fry's? Pay with a check. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Those bastards... I bought $5000 worth of computer gear (laptop + lots of other stuff) -- I could put this on my credit card, but why pay with a card... They called like 6 million people, verified the check, my id, they called my wife. They filled out a lot of forms. Then the drone hands me my copy of thier forms, I put it in my bag and walked out. Post frisking, at the car I noticed MY CHECK IN THE BAG. No fucking WAY I'm going back inside and waiting another half hour.


    Anyhow, next day I got a call from them. I asked the dude how long I waited at the register and he said he just watched it, 34 minutes. I made them call me back a few times but in the end I agreed to let thier drones come to my house and give me a gift certificate in exchange for a new check. When the drones got here I made them wait about 20 minutes while I called thier bosses and made sure who they were and got some other people on the phone to describe them. I always pay by check at fry's now...

  83. pay good money for bad data... by mr_walrus · · Score: 2

    so... egghead sends email to the email address
    on file offering an opt-out.
    but, your email-on-file happened to have change
    (is no longer valid). you don't get it, you
    don't opt-out.

    egghead goes ahead and sells that info to Fryes...

    i wonder if Fryes has any idea of the *quality*
    of info they are buying?

    i kinda like this possibility :)

  84. normal business practice by asv108 · · Score: 1

    When a company merges or forms a partnership with another company, customer info is usually shared. There is nothing illegal or wrong with this practice. You should actually be happy that they are informing you and giving you the chance to opt-out.

  85. the customer of my competitor is my customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll never sell your account inf. at ScaredCity, plus you could acquire this flashy URL from us, & we'll STILL never tell who you are.

  86. case study by flufffy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    here's a concrete example altho i do not know if it was discussed here.

    in the fall of 2000, toysmart, an online toy retailer partly owned by the walt disney corporation, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy, and announced that it was including its customer data base as one of the assets to be liquidated. disney had injected $45 million into toysmart but finally pulled the plug in may 2000, and shortly after toysmart filed for bankruptcy.

    it then emerged that toysmart considered its database of customer information to be a liquidisable asset, that it would sell, in effect, to the highest 'trustworthy' bidder.

    the federal trade commission disagreed with toysmart, and for a while considered blocking the sale, before finally allowing it to proceed under restricted conditions. notably, these conditions did not include any obligation on the part of toysmart's creditors to either inform or obtain permission from toysmart's customers. in the end, the data did not provoke a bidding frenzy: the highest offer had come from disney itself ($50,000), with the next highest offer being $15,000 from a market research firm in maine.

    for more info search google, cnet, etc., with relevant terms.

  87. I succeeded by Croaker · · Score: 2

    I got the e-mail, followed the link, entered my user name and password (fortunately written down a while ago, since I've not bought anything from them in tears) and they claim I've been removed.

    All of this in Konqueror, so not even a hassle that I don't have one of the "big two" browsers.

    Of course, if you're paranoid, there is the question of whether they will honor it...

    1. Re:I succeeded by Mark_Hopkins · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got the e-mail, followed the link, entered my user name and password (fortunately written down a while ago, since I've not bought anything from them in tears) and they claim I've been removed.

      So, do you normally cry when you buy things?

      -Mark

    2. Re:I succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they don't honor it, they're in direct violation of the law (graham-leach-bliley act), and they know it damn well.

  88. On-Line Security by nettdata · · Score: 1

    It's quite funny (or sad, really) that most developers seem to think that just because information is encrypted or delivered through SSL that it's actually secure.

    This is simply not the case.

    What a LOT of people fail to understand is that in an automated process (such as an on-line transaction) where that sensitive information, such as a credit card number, is required to complete that transaction, there will more than likely be some automated process for getting that information from the database.

    I've worked with developers that have utilized encrypted storage for credit card numbers, passwords, etc., and they seem really surprised when I hack into it. When asked how I did it, I said, "why waste your time on breaking the encryption when all you have to do is find the function you guys call that does just that?".

    It comes down to the fact that it isn't the technology, it's the implementation.

    In short, it could be summed up to say that most "secure" sites lock the front door, but leave the key under the mat.

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  89. What is the default status of customer records? by hillct · · Score: 2

    This is the real question. If not explicitly defined in a company's privacy policy, such as Amazon.com did (saying their customer records were a business asset to be sold), do companies have the right to treat it as such? Apatently they can, although it hasn't been tested in court - but then, why did Amazon.com eplicitly state it if it were the default treatment.

    As a corolary, are companies who aquire assets of another company, bound by the agreements made by that other company? I believe as a general matter of law, this is dependant on the contract in question, but with respect to customer information, is there not a defacto contract in place, governed by the terms of the company's (the company being aquired) privacy policy? Are privacy policies transferable such that they continue to be in force with respect to the data over which they originally had effect?

    Since I am not a lawyer, I don't have the answers to these questions but I believe my understanding is sufficient to have properly posed them with respect to the legal status in question.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
  90. Can't opt out by jyoull · · Score: 1
    bullshit

    I apparently have THREE accounts with them, two through jobs and one personal... and i have to be able to magically match up "user names" that I no longer know, with each of the e-mail addresses.

    There is no way to get out of it otherwise.

    Dammit to hell.

  91. Re:Paranoia flashback by Ranger+Rick · · Score: 1

    Wow, that takes me back.

    Happiness is mandatory. Are You Happy?

    --

    WWJD? JWRTFM!!!

  92. Big frigg'n deal. by garren_bagley · · Score: 1

    So the wuck fhat.

  93. S.O.P. by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    For many companies their mailing list is the most valuable asset they have. I hate to admit to being a marketing slime in my past, but I was. One of the companies I was with had a up and coming product, but little cash in the bank for advertising. We traded our mailing list for ad's in magazines. We would also rent the mailing list of the magazines and other software companies and visa versa. Nowadays with scanners and "discount cards", and on and on not only your idenity is being swap, but your buying habits. An that's all legit. Now with phreaks sniffing phone systems. At most stores when you swipe your credit card to pay for something unless a major chain your info is going out in clear text over modem lines. You info belongs to the world.

  94. Unencrypted passwords submitted via Egghead form! by CharlesDarwin · · Score: 1

    I received a copy of the email from Egghead. When I went to the site to have my personal information removed, I received a notice from internet explorer (I know...) that the form was composing a message on my behalf. I checked the content of the message being sent to smtp-02.egghead.com and noticed that it included my Egghead.com username and password in unencrypted form. As SMTP traffice is not encrypted, this is VERY, VERY bad!!!!

  95. FUKK frys -- i want a blowjob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUKK frys -- i want a blowjob and $100 too

    1. Re:FUKK frys -- i want a blowjob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey pal,

      I want a blowjob too.

  96. Not telling the whole truth by AllieA · · Score: 1

    This is from the above-referenced article about Fry's requiring that no more than 10% of Egghead's customer's opt out:

    "As part of the proposed $10 million sale, Fry's is requiring that no more than 10 percent of active customers--anyone who bought something at Egghead in the last two years--can "opt out" of a plan to transfer their information over to Fry's Electronics, according to a bankruptcy filing at U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California."

    Well, I have NEVER purchased anything from Egghead.com. I purchased a single printer from Onsale back in 1997. The part about "two years" is a lie. I would imagine that when Egghead and Onsale "merged", all of the accounts were "reset".

    Does anyone really believe they'd voluntarily drop your name after two years?

  97. if you'll pardon my saying so.... by underivy · · Score: 1

    if i understand you correctly, then what you're saying is not entirely true. the graham-leach-bliley act provides that the consumer must be allowed to opt out (of having private data sold to third-parties and non-affiliates) at any time. they are required to notify you of your rights regarding your privacy (and they do so...usually in fine print somewhere). unfortunately, the GLB doesn't allow you the option to opt out for affiliates, but it probably wouldn't hurt to ask.

    when the act was still in congress, consumer advocates requested an opt-in procedure, meaning that consumers would have to expressly request that their information be shared, but it was turned down.

    you, as the consumer have the burden of protecting your own information by conatacting all of your financial institutions, and telling them to opt you out. when you do so, make sure that you tell them to opt you out of everything, including telemarketing calls, mail inserts, direct mail, etc.

    if you want to learn more, go read up on the fair credit reporting act and the graham-leach-bliley act.

    of course, much of your "private" information is publicly available through government agencies (DMV), unless you live in virginia california....because they had some trouble with a stalker getting the residence information of actress rebecca schaeffer (from my sister sam), and he subsequently murdered her, but that's a different matter.

  98. What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you trusted Egghead with your personal data, there's little reason to argue against Fry's (or whomever) ownership of your data -- they have to follow Egghead's privacy policy unless they give you an "opportunity to consent to any changes".

  99. Misuse of credit card database (slightly offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I registered a domain name at register.com. One year later I received a notification to my hotmail account that they would renew my registration and charge me money from my credit card unless i replied to a specific address. I got really mad, especially since I had left these mails for a copule of weeks since I thought it was spam. How can it be legal to do this?

  100. The algoritm is known by led · · Score: 1

    Yes, the combinations are enormous, but parts if not all of the algoritm is known, a few years back I saw a simplification of the algoritm that allowed a person to generate a valid number with a few simple calculations. You could actualy generate a valid card just using your head...
    Of couse all you got was a subset of the dominion of valid cards.

  101. Law changes... by led · · Score: 1

    In Portugal(where I live) a company has to register its database (of personal information) with the state, and has to allow persons they have in the database to view, correct and delete data about them...
    So if you don't like a company I can make them delete your file... ( the fines are very hard, and the state can actualy close a company that doesn't follow this).

  102. It should be opt-in, not opt-out by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

    Companies should not be allowed to sell or share customers' personal information unless the customer explicitly says they can.

  103. Well, their fullfillment sucks by sawilson · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting 3 weeks for items I won at auction. According to their policy, if they don't ship me my items within another week, they will be nice enough to "cancel my order for me". That kinda sucks because I got a great price on some drives. I wish they'd put things back the way they were before this whole egghead mess happened at all. I prefered www.onsale.com because I figured it was more reliable than Ebay. Now years later, I have more faith in 'joe ebay user' than I do in egghead. And Fry's can just light themselves on fire and throw themselves down a flight of stairs. I've never had anything but complete hell getting anything resembling service from them.

  104. Mailbox full by stafunk · · Score: 1

    Tried to opt out, got this:

    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
    ... while talking to smtp02.egghead.com.:
    >>> RCPT To:
    452 4.2.2 Mailbox full

    ugh.

  105. Attempt Declined by OldCrasher · · Score: 1

    Just got my attempt to opt-out declined. Seems their web page has the wrong email address or something is a bit flaky in their processing of these messages.

    Not knowing diddly about Fry's (they are a West Coast company, we're on the bombed side) I don't want them to have my info and the potential to abuse it.

  106. And why wouldn't the mailbox be full? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 0

    It's worth their while to have "Administrative Problems" with requests not to sell data... Too many requests would queer the deal.

    --
    Who did what now?
  107. Never done business with Egghead, but got notice by LazloTheDog · · Score: 1
    I've never done any business with Egghead, yet I got this notice. This raises a whole bunch of questions - Why am I in their db? How did I get there? Do they have my cc? What other info are they selling about me? How many others are in a similar situation?

    Taken as a whole, this is quite troubling.

    jm

    --
    Oink, Oink!!
  108. And the problem with this is ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    excuse me for asking, but what's the problem of having your 'personal info' go to someone else?

    Are you going to have your bank accounts raided? No.

    Are you going to be shot in the street? No.

    Is it going to have ANY NEGATIVE AFFECT ON YOUR LIFE WHATSOEVER? NO.

    Please shut the hell up about this crap.

  109. Of course by vanyel · · Score: 1

    When one company buys another, one certainly expects to get their customer database; this is no different in the online world than it is in the physical world.

  110. OPT-OUT did not work by nycdewd · · Score: 1

    I received the email from egghead.com informing me of the issue and the opportunity to opt out of having my info sold over to Fry's... THE OPT OUT DID NOT WORK, I received email notification that the opt out email failed to reach its specified destination, and therefore my choice to opt out was not registered. There is an 800 number that may or may not work, it was listed at egghead's opt out webpage...

  111. you CAN opt out! by rkent · · Score: 2

    dude, here's the URL for the opt-out page:

    http://www.egghead.com/ShowPage.dll?page=b_1_opt _p

    ... and you don't need a password, it asks for your username and email address. Plus, it's just a mailto form anyway, so compose a message to the address and ask to be opt-ed out.

    Furthermore, call 1-800-EGG HEAD to get a customer service representative for help if the above process doesn't seem to work.

    Try the proceedure before you panic and say they're screwing you over! Remember, egg head no longer has anything to lose by 5% of their customers opting out this way.

    1. Re:you CAN opt out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, shithead, how would the guy know his
      "user name" if someone else created it? Duuuuhhh.

  112. Most sell the information. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    And no, thet don't have to tell you about it.
    Why?

    You don't have a de-facto right to control your information in the US, that's why. The database of information the company lawfully collected in their business dealings is THEIR asset to do what they want with (within the law, of course).

    The individual records, they aren't that valuable. You don't 'own' all information about you in the world. The database as a whole has value.

    As for them getting hacked, and losing their credit card info.. why do you feel so personally burned? The credit card belongs to the issuer, not you, and it's not YOUR problem if it's abused, it's the issuers. Yes, it may be slightly inconvenient to you to get it replaced.. though they informed you. Even though they said 'everything is okay', you can still call your credit card company up and request a new card because you suspect your current one has been compromised. They will send you a new one immediately at no charge.

    I don't see what the big deal is.

    1. Re:Most sell the information. by Boomer2 · · Score: 1

      Your statements about the credit card are wrong.

      If someone abuses my credit card, I'm still on the hook for the first $50. Even worse, they can trash my credit history by going on a spending spree. Getting those incidents off of the databases is a nightmare that takes forever.

      Post your credit card info on every BBS you can find, then report to us in a year or two how your life has changed. Then tell us whether or not it's a big deal.

  113. If they don't have clear unrestricted title... by ??? · · Score: 1

    Look, if there were a long-standing tradition of selling customers' computers in for repairs, that still wouldn't make it legal. Regardless of the context of the sale of the company, the company can't sell something it doesn't own, or that it has contractually agreed not to sell.

  114. Well. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I checked my credit card contract.
    And as I though...
    I am liable for up to $50 of fraudulent charges if they are a result of my *card being stolen*, and I haven't reported it.

    The language is quite explicitly clear. I am only liable if my card is physically stolen (lost, etc..).

    The $50 limit you specify is a legal one; credit card issuers cannot produce, say, a cardholder agreemnet that makes you responsible for, say, $200 if the card is used incorrectly.. becauset the law says so.

    If I were to post my card number to every BBS, the card company could hold me as being negligent; the cardholder agreement does discuss responsible use of the card. And responsible use includes letting them know when it's being used fraudulently.

    Now.. maybe, just maybe, my cardholder agreement for my generic classic Visa from the Royal Bank of Canada is better than every other credit card agreement out there... but I doubt it.

    I am only resonsible for (potentially) up to $50 in fraudulent charges resulting from the theft of my CARD.

  115. CC validation by enigma48 · · Score: 1

    I'm 99% sure anything other than the credit card number itself is 'voluntarily' checked. All the equipment I've seen in Canada only requires a CC number - this can be typed manually, swiped, etc.

    But there IS incentive for a business to do some checking - CC companies recommend it, and if someone uses a fake card, CC companies have some options in getting the money back. Or never dispursing it to retail company X in the first place.

  116. For the record, I had no problems by Fas+Attarac · · Score: 2

    Their opt-out process was very quick and painless for me after I received the e-mail notice. I only bothered to opt-out because I had no intention of doing business with them in the near future.