Slashdot Mirror


1GB USB Drive on a Keychain

sparcv9 writes "JMTek looks to be about ready to release a line of keychain-sized USB drives, ranging in capacity from 16MB to 1GB. The 1GB models are a bit pricey at almost $900US, but the 16, 32 and 64MB models are all under $100. These devices require no external power supply, claim a data retention of 10 years, and are 'driverless' -- which means that the drives will work under Linux, according to JMTek (see the 'Operating Systems' row in the specs table.)"

274 comments

  1. These have been out forever... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Informative

    This stuff has been on the market for a long time. Though it is cool stuff.

    Though, all I want for yule is a solid state harddrive that's as fast as ram...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:These have been out forever... by boobytrap · · Score: 1

      I have one of these: http://www.universalsmartdrive.com/ I installed my e-mail client on a 64mb stick. I take it with me when I travel. Pretty handy little thing.

      --
      ~~my brain hurts~~
    2. Re:These have been out forever... by Nullsmack · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah I trust a company that misspells Plug-N-Play on their front page..

      (it's "Pulg-N-Play" on there.

      .

    3. Re:These have been out forever... by The_THOMAS · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, some little MarCom twit is gonna get her ass chewed for that misspelling. Think I'll get the ball rolling by sending them a friendly email pointing it out.

      --
      Ya Sure! You Betcha!, The_THOMAS
  2. Driverless, drivers will be available for download by jeff67 · · Score: 1
    From the cited spec page
    * Windows 98 Drivers will be available for download
  3. Tens years? by dozing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing would last ten years on my key chain. If I don't lose them I break them.

    --
    Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
    1. Re:Tens years? by laserjet · · Score: 2

      You have a very good point. Right now I have a pretty solid aluminum caribiner on my keychain, and i see spots where it has been bent and had dents or small chuncks of metal taken out. Some women and men could use this, but not those of us that keep the keys in our pockets, throw them around sometimes, use them for tools, and whose keys generally have a rough life.

      and keys can be replaced... what if your data ws valuable on your keychain and you either broke it or lost your keys? the horror!

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Tens years? by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      The idea here, I believe, is that you can store all that information in a very small space. It could be on a necklace, or a wrist watch type thing, or in your hand. But it is good to have a very compact data storage medium like this.

    3. Re:Tens years? by Dunall · · Score: 1

      Uhh... It says keychain sized... not a HD made to hang from your keychain.

    4. Re:Tens years? by Boulder+Geek · · Score: 1
      I've had an Apple 256k SIMM I've been using as a key fob since 1992. One thing I can say about Apple memory: it hasn't gotten forgotten yet.

      --
      A well-crafted lie appears unquestionable - Dama Mahaleo
    5. Re:Tens years? by laserjet · · Score: 2

      It is clearly marketed to carry with you wherever you go, in your pocket or on your keychain. Read the article, dipshit:

      "Before you leave your home or work, backup your most important data and carry it with you . Imagine being able to keep your budget, your address book or important email in your pocket without worry!"

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re:Tens years? by Dunall · · Score: 1

      This was in reference to hanging it from their keychain.. If you look at the pictures it has clips for hanging it in your notebook, pocket etc... not necessarily a keychain dipshit.

      I had no idea that carry it with you meant to carry it on a keychain.. Guess that my pager and cellphone have been in the wrong place all this time.. Gonna make it one big pain in the ass to drive and talk on the phone now.

      STFU... don't get so hostile when someone points out that you're a complete fucking idiot.

    7. Re:Tens years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      STFU... don't get so hostile when someone points out that you're a complete fucking idiot.

      Dude, that's the funniest thing I've seen yet on slashdot. Please let me know if you're going to sell T-shirts with that printed on them.

    8. Re:Tens years? by squidfood · · Score: 1


      Like everything else on my keychain, this is only useful if it doubles as a bottle-opener.

  4. Smoking by Llama+Keeper · · Score: 1, Troll

    Look Mom its my MP3 collection on my keychain... DOH I dropped it in the crapper.... well whats $900 between friends anyway.

    --


    Rule of Life Number 2: Remember, it can all go to hell at any minute. --Jimmy Buffet
    1. Re:Smoking by dozing · · Score: 1

      You can fit all you mp3s in 1 gig?

      --
      Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
    2. Re:Smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but mya favorites of the week are 'bout 2 CD's, close enough to 1 gig. Don't you have anything better to do than make inane comments on Slashdot?

    3. Re:Smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see. avg .mp3 of 6mb x 16 songs per cd x 2 cd's = 192mb. Not quite 1000mb bub.

    4. Re:Smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yer a fsck -nut dude. I can put on two MP3 cd's about what I ususally listen too. Thats about 650MB * 2 = 1200MB, close enough to 1024MB in a gigabyte... go get laid or something.... I'm studying for finals

    5. Re:Smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever really dropped your keys in the crapper? And please tell us what you did about it.

  5. Less than 1CM Thick? Use it in a camera! by Bonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to the product spec page:


    67mm w/cap x 20mm x 9mm
    60mm w/o cap x 20mm x 9mm

    I'm not sure they have anything more than prototypes at the moment, but this is still a pretty nifty advance for people who need more storage for digital video and digital photography.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Less than 1CM Thick? Use it in a camera! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Flash is already in cameras. I have a few 16 Meg and a 32 Meg for my ancient (almost 2 year old) Nikon CoolPix 800. With the NikonView driver the flash memory looks just like regular hard disk on my Win98 laptop. Tho Windows knows about it, too, and decides to warn me that the D: drive is almost full when I put it in the PCMCIA adapter and plug it in, full to capacity with jpeg files.

      Check out my web page to see some photos I've taken with it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Less than 1CM Thick? Use it in a camera! by JatTDB · · Score: 2

      IBM's Microdrives are a better deal (from a purely MB per $ stance...quick glance at Pricewatch shows 1GB Microdrives for $300), and is already designed around the CF slot interface, which a lot of cameras already have.

      --
      "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
  6. Uhm, this isn't new... by wjp3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    IBM has had the same thing out now for a while... I have one.

    Check out the 8mb model for $25...

    http://commerce.www.ibm.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce/Pr od uctDisplay?cntrfnbr=1&prmenbr=1&prnbr=SCC4513&cntr y=840&lang=en_US

    1. Re:Uhm, this isn't new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but is it one giga?

    2. Re:Uhm, this isn't new... by Tasty+Beef+Jerky · · Score: 0

      This is the way we make a link, make a link, make a link.
      This is the way we make a link so people don't have to fix your crappy URL with the damned spaces added in!

      --

      I'm the tasty treat nobody can resist!
      IM Me! AOL IM:Tasty Beef Jerky

    3. Re:Uhm, this isn't new... by jeff67 · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Uhm, this isn't new... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      IBM has had the same thing out now for a while... I have one.

      Check out the 8mb model for $25...

      ...and it has a ring through which it can be attached to a keychain. 8 megs is more than enough for a PGP/GPG key and a copy of PuTTY...looks like I'm snagging one of these. (BTW, the price is down to $23.75. Someone else provided a corrected link, but I might as well include it again.)
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:Uhm, this isn't new... by arnex · · Score: 1

      This is cool -- and thanks to everyone who posted the link -- but I'm not keen to pay an arm and a leg to ship a $24 impulse purchase, nor am I in the mood to give IBM all my personal info to calculate shipping charges. So does anyone know what IBM charges to ship these? Their "shipping estimator" is no help at all.

    6. Re:Uhm, this isn't new... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      So does anyone know what IBM charges to ship these? Their "shipping estimator" is no help at all.
      UPS Ground was $5 to Las Vegas. You'll probably get charged sales tax too, as IBM has offices nearly everywhere.
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    7. Re:Uhm, this isn't new... by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      Sweet, thanks for the link. For ~$31 shipped, this is a hell of a deal. Will be great for transferring small files back and forth, and since I always have my keys with me, I won't have to go hunting for media to put things on.

      Just ordered one for myself...

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  7. What a nightmare for corporations by lynchmenow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Think of the opportunities for corporate espionage with these type of things. Is there a way to disable USB mass-storage devices in XP or 2000?

    1. Re:What a nightmare for corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, it's called "install Windows NT" ;)

    2. Re:What a nightmare for corporations by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      I'd be surprised if there weren't. You can disabled damn near anything through security policies. I know you can disable installing new drivers, so just don't include the mass storage driver in your base install and block users from installing new drivers....

    3. Re:What a nightmare for corporations by gorillasoft · · Score: 1

      Except that the article linked to says they do not require drivers....

      but you still may be able to disable the USB access.

    4. Re:What a nightmare for corporations by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Not as far as I know, but now thinking about it, why couldn't someone use a Nomad Jukebox or something similar to transfer sensitive information? Is there something that limits them to taking mp3? Almost certainly not, and if anyone asks any questions, you're just transferring harmless bootleg music; and everyone loves bootleg music.

    5. Re:What a nightmare for corporations by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      My point is, it requires the generic "USB mass storage driver" -- it's included with the default install (and pretty cool. I plugged my camera in and it worked without having to install anything)SO you could probably do a custom install of win2k to NOT have it (or remove it as an admin) and if the user can't add drivers, they can't use it or any other similiar device.

    6. Re:What a nightmare for corporations by jstockdale · · Score: 1

      damn ... i would really want one except the usefullness of 1 gig becomes impared when you have to access it via usb ... why couldn't they of just used firewire? or at least released 2 interface versions. albeit this won't be a prob with the smaller ones for 8 megs on usb doesn't really take that long, but who wants to wait like an hour to transfer that video scene you just finised editing and compressing to your keychain to take down to the other editing suite.

      I never like usb when it came out because of its speed, and now a few years later the same speed seems releatively less. Jeez start using a more up to date standard ... firewire or usb 2.0

      -end rant

      --
      **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  8. Oops! by akincaid · · Score: 2, Funny

    I accidentally locked my drive in the car!

    1. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny? He wasn't joking! And his family is in there!

  9. Is it just me but Driverless? by jmccay · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I am skeptical aboutthat claim. Something is needed to read and write to the drive. Plaus the line at the bottom of one of the pages:

    "* Windows 98 Drivers will be available for download"

    My guess is that it may use an exhisting driver, or the package you buy has one.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    1. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by cancrman · · Score: 1

      It seems to work just like my IBM Disk On Key dealie. It works fine with ME/2K/XP but it did come with a CD-Rom with drivers for '98 on it.

      Kind of a pain in the ass if you want to use it with a lot of different '98 computers, but it works perfectly for my applications.

      Pete

      --
      The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
    2. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by JHromadka · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have an 8MB DiskOnKey keyring, and it worked great when transferring files between a friend's WinME laptop and my PowerBook running OS X. No drivers required (except for the aforementioned Win98) means no drivers required. :)

      Personally I'd rather have a Firewire one instead. Transferring 1GB over USB would take quite a while.

      --
      "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    3. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid moron. It requires the generic driver for storage devices that is defined as a part of USB (as another stupid moron stated, but could tell that if it needs a device driver, it is _NOT_ a driverless device!!!!

    4. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by Skirwan · · Score: 1
      Personally I'd rather have a Firewire one instead. Transferring 1GB over USB would take quite a while.

      Did someone say FireWire?

      It's a bit bigger, but also more capacity and a much more reasonable price - and it's still smaller than a deck of playing cards.

      --
      Mod me down, I'm off-topic.
    5. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      No shit, Sherlock. Fact is, to anybody not very technically-minded and even those who are but are not anal retentive, "uses a driver that all current implementations of USB come with" is a reasonable approximation of "driverless".

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    6. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by Graff · · Score: 1
      Personally I'd rather have a Firewire one instead. Transferring 1GB over USB would take quite a while.

      Well, for under 1/2 the price ($400 compared to $900) you can get an Apple iPod that holds 5 gigs, has Firewire, and plays music. It acts as a generic Firewire drive, just like the JMTek device acts as a generic USB drive. The iPod is a bit larger, but since it's the size of a deck of cards it still fits very easily into your pocket.

    7. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      You stupid moron. It requires the generic driver for storage devices that is defined as a part of USB (as another stupid moron stated, but could tell that if it needs a device driver, it is _NOT_ a driverless device!!!!

      Nor is an IDE drive, disk drive or serial port - each needs a driver. They are just usually written into the OS. In this case, any OS that supports USB does not need a driver for this drive. If the OS supports USB, then it's automagically supported.

      As has been pointed out to you twice now, Win98 does not support this because it has broken USB support. Think of the software as a patch to fix Win98's USB support - happy now?

      Does an external modem need a driver? No. Does the serial port have to work to use it? Yes. If your OS requires some setup for the serial port to work, then it dosen't mean that the external modem needs a driver. It means that your OS doesn't support the serial port. Win98 doesn't support (completely) the Universal Serial Bus... that doesn't mean that *this* needs a driver, it means that the *USB port* needs a driver.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by JHromadka · · Score: 1
      Well, for under 1/2 the price ($400 compared to $900) you can get an Apple iPod that holds 5 gigs, has Firewire, and plays music...

      Oh I couldn't agree more -- I bought an iPod for my wife. :) My point was that USB was slow for large transfers.

      --
      "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    9. Re:Is it just me but Driverless? by znu · · Score: 2

      Or get an iPod. I think it has the same mechanism as that drive, and the extra $100 for the built-in MP3 player seems like a good deal to me.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
  10. Might catch on by Erasei · · Score: 1

    if they would market a couple of portable MP3 players that could stream right from one of these. Not only mp3 players, but anything that requires portable storage.. digital cameras with video, etc.

    --
    visit my free wallpaper collection, wp.erasei.com
    1. Re:Might catch on by alister667 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, an small mp3 player that had a USB port to allow connection to a 128M or 256M keyring HD would be very neat. The only problem is that the MP3 device would need to supply the power via the USB to the keyring HD. I don't see specs on power consumption, but I suspect the whole ensemble would eat batteries! Otherwise very nice.

      --
      We ARE the peat bog soldiers.
    2. Re:Might catch on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB devices, unlike fire-wire based devices, require a "USB Host Controller", the cost of adding said device to a portable mp3 player would put it outside of it's mp3 player relatives.

  11. IBM Disk on Key by cancrman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've got one of the IBM keychain dealies. It's only 8mb, but it's actually quite handy for data transfers. My parents have a slow modem (as opposed to a fast one? anyway) at their house and no CD burner. Sometimes I have to get some work done there and the 8mb of the IBM fits all of my Excel sheets just fine.

    While 8mb has been fine for the 6 months I've had the thing, of course these new releases will force me to upgrade.

    On thing though, its a serious Pain In The Ass to try and plug one of these things in blind. I've got a USB hub at home, but they really aren't all that common yet.

    Pete

    --
    The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
    1. Re:IBM Disk on Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, plugging in USB devices is a pain in the ass. Having a USB hub in your keyboard (see Microsoft Natural Keyboard Pro) really helps!

    2. Re:IBM Disk on Key by prator · · Score: 1

      On thing though, its a serious Pain In The Ass to try and plug one of these things in blind.

      Actually, many cases sport USB plugs on the front panel now. It's very convenient.

      -prator

    3. Re:IBM Disk on Key by isorox · · Score: 2

      Many computers have an extra 2 ports on the front for things like this.

    4. Re:IBM Disk on Key by Sir+Tristam · · Score: 2
      On thing though, its a serious Pain In The Ass to try and plug one of these things in blind.
      You'll be glad to know, then, that one of the accessories they say they offer is a USB extension cable.

      Chris Beckenbach

  12. Win98 doesn't conform by Llama+Keeper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's because Win98 doesn't support the USB mass-storage standard. Win2K, XP, and most BSD's do... Microsoft laggin behind... who'd a thunk it?

    --


    Rule of Life Number 2: Remember, it can all go to hell at any minute. --Jimmy Buffet
    1. Re:Win98 doesn't conform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft laggin behind... who'd a thunk it?"

      That's funny. I thought Win2K and XP were made by Microsoft.

    2. Re:Win98 doesn't conform by rhombic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The 1.x linux kernel doesn't support it, either. I guess that means Linux is lagging behind. I'm as much of a linux person as anybody else here, but why beat up on M$ for not adding support for new devices to their old OS's?

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    3. Re:Win98 doesn't conform by dzym · · Score: 1

      So wait, Microsoft is somehow responsible for full compatibility to a standard (1.0, 1998/10) that comes out AFTER the RTM of Windows 98 code (1998/4) and which the first products that adhered to the standard didn't come out until AFTER the release of Windows 98 Second Edition? Seems like they did well to put that support into the Win2K line.

    4. Re:Win98 doesn't conform by spitzak · · Score: 2
      He's saying they didn't have it in 1998, while claiming the other systems did have it in 1998, and thus Microsoft is "lagging".

      However I would question the claim that other systems did have it at that time, can anybody confirm?

    5. Re:Win98 doesn't conform by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Because people still use Win98. Find me someone who still uses a 1.x kernel for any real work (i.e., it's not just a system that was set on a shelf somewhere and forgotten, or some kernel hacker looking at ancient code.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    6. Re:Win98 doesn't conform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're still supporting Windows 98 officially, and on top of that, Windows 98 SE came out after the spec date. And it still doesn't recognize USB Mass Storage devices.

    7. Re:Win98 doesn't conform by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      That's because Win98 doesn't support the USB mass-storage standard. Win2K, XP, and most BSD's do... Microsoft laggin behind... who'd a thunk it?

      Yeah, its too bad Win98's technology is behind that of Win2k and XP. I mean, if Win2k and XP were a lot newer than 98, I could understand it. But with such a great, new product as Win98, its simply inexcusable.

      Of course, you also can't excuse Microsoft for releasing Win98 when it is Clearly inferior to Win2k and XP. The company that produced those products is probably jumping for joy at that Microsoft snafu.

      Seriously, I'm sure I'll get modded down for this one, but I just find idiocy hard to believe sometimes. I won't comment on the BSD's, because he leaves the door pretty wide open here, and I'm not sure when BSD got MSD released.

  13. When they hit 100GB.. by crumbz · · Score: 1

    or three times the size of my notebook drive, I'll get one.
    Your twenty favorite movies on your keychain.

  14. On the key chain? by utdpenguin · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Hello? Tech support?

    I've locked my hard drive in my car! p?

    --
    In Soviet Russia you dant have to put up with these crappy jokes
  15. 1GB = 900? Yeah right by Omerna · · Score: 2

    For $900 why not buy a PDA... or two? More functional, more storage space, and you're less likely to lose it. It's just ridiculous, and I don't see anybody buying it except to say, "Hey! Look what I got!"

    --


    No sig for you.
    1. Re:1GB = 900? Yeah right by thetzar · · Score: 1

      How many PDAs do you know with 1 GIG of storage?

    2. Re:1GB = 900? Yeah right by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Most PDA's seem to be around 8 meg for $100. Even if you ignore the overhead, that's 125 PDAs, or $12,500 to replace one $900 keychain.

    3. Re:1GB = 900? Yeah right by snubber1 · · Score: 1

      How about one $400-500 pda, say an ipaq of sorts. Throw in a 1gb IBM microdrive which can be had for around $300. A usb cf reader is $20. You now have a whole lot more functionality for the same money.

      --
      I don't really mind double posts on //..
    4. Re:1GB = 900? Yeah right by LinuxHam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many PDAs do you know with 1 GIG of storage?

      Seriously! And who the hell compares the functionality of a batteryless keychain hard drive with no moving parts to a freaking PDA! The only way to get a gig on a PDA is to find one that takes CompactFlash and use the IBM 1GB CompactFlash microdrive... complete with moving parts!

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    5. Re:1GB = 900? Yeah right by foxtrot · · Score: 1

      The only way to get a gig on a PDA is to find one that takes CompactFlash and use the IBM 1GB CompactFlash microdrive... complete with moving parts!

      That's the cheaper way to do it, but an iPaq with a dual-PCMCIA slot adapter and a pair of 512 meg
      CF cards will do it without moving parts. 1GB CF cards are on the horizon but not here yet.

      Or, you can use that same dual-PCMCIA slot adapter and pop a pair of Toshiba 5GB PCMCIA hard disks in it for a 10 GB PDA, though you are back in the realm of moving parts.

      You can do some pretty sick things with PDAs nowadays. When I spent six weeks in Europe recently, my digital camera's storage brick consisted of an iPaq with a 20GB laptop hard disk. This link will take you to a site with details on the storage brick.

      -JDF

    6. Re:1GB = 900? Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... You have to think about bringing your PDA someplace... (Unless you're at the office all day, that is)

      The cool part here is how you carry your keys with you-- always...

  16. worst kind of popup, kill this story by inio · · Score: 1

    these guys have the worst kind of popup possible. One of those things that sits behind all your brower windows and won't let you focus it, forcing you to quit the browser. Please, for the same of all thats good in the world, take this story down until they remove it.

    1. Re:worst kind of popup, kill this story by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Just right-click on the taskbar thingy and hit close. It easily goes away. That's not exactly the hardest thing to do, now is it?

  17. details, and a bad choice? by anothy · · Score: 2

    the site's a bit low on details, no? i want a bit more tech info. for example, if it's driverless, why list the three(Win32, MacOS, and Linux) OS's they "support" at all? shouldn't anything with USB drivers work? and, oh, why're they making Win32 drivers available, if it's driveress?

    personally, i'll hold out for a firewire version. transfering up to 1GB at USB speeds is a bit slow for me.

    --

    i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    1. Re:details, and a bad choice? by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because there is a standard driver for USB harddrives. If you follow the standard in making your harddrive (or memory card drive) it will work without additional drivers. BUT! it does require the operating system to know this standards, win98 doesn't have the standard driver (thats why it says on bottom, comes with windows 98 driver), windows 2000, ME, and XP include this driver, as well as Mac OS 8.6 and above. Linux 2.4 comes with standard driver, but linux 2.2 doesn't. You can get the driver for linux 2.2 though.

    2. Re:details, and a bad choice? by spitzak · · Score: 2

      Because if they don't list the operating systems supported most people would assumme Windows only!

    3. Re:details, and a bad choice? by cornice · · Score: 1
      if it's driverless, why list the three(Win32, MacOS, and Linux) OS's they "support" at all?

      I see what you're getting at but if I made a device that is "driverless" I would still put icons on my site for every major OS that works with it - that I can support. You may know that your OS works with any generic USB device but my customer base does not. Plus my device may work with xyzOS but that doesn't mean I have someone in tech support who knows how to get USB working under xyzOS.

    4. Re:details, and a bad choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [..] i'll hold out for a firewire version[..]

      Such as Apple's iPod, which not only offers a blazing fast 5GB storage for less than half the price but happens to be a wonderfully elegant MP3-player to boot?
  18. You've got to want this for size or coolness... by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ... because CD-R media are a heck of a lot cheaper until you've burned quite a few. At least the price will eventually come down.

    But I really don't see what it's good for. Storing lots of stuff? CD-R or CD-RW; your computer probably has a drive already, and you can stash more data than even the 1/2 GB drive. Holding encryption keys? You want something a lot smaller, cheaper and more rugged. Having something neat to put in your pocket? Okay, but that's not going to sell lots of them.

    1. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by Zog · · Score: 1

      The thing about CD burners is that you can't go back and change things - you can add to the end of it, but that doesn't help much if you want to correct a number you put on something you're about to take to a friend's house - you have to re-burn it instead.

    2. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by hardburn · · Score: 1

      The problem with CD-R/W is that it is rather klumsy for saving stuff. CD-R/W is not an effective replacement for a good (bad) ol' floppy disk. Zip disks are a rather expensive, propreity disk type, so they're no good. I would be very happy to see these USB devices allow me to throw away my floppies.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by ShortedOut · · Score: 1

      I can think of over a thousand uses for a device such as this for a hardware support technician. What about people who can not have internet access at home and need to share files from work(and a ton of cash burning a hole in their pocket)? This invention is a God-send! Imagine what all of our spies/disgruntled employees can get themselves into now!

    4. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by Quizme2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I can tell you what is bad for...Security. Especially with win2000/XP automatic detection of USB devices it could be used as a effective delivery device for worm/virus packages to machines without or with protected email and Internet access. With the 1gig size you could certainly steal a lot of data very easily. So what if you the most secure firewall and email protection. Are you screening your maintenance people, your temp workers? With a little social engineering this device could be very dangerous, easy to conceal, even through metal detectors with the phrase "Oh, my keys set it off". Sorry if I'm little excited about it, I'm just a Spy Novel fan and have a really good caffeine buzz too.

      Dell has been selling 8-32Mb versions for more than a year, but they require a driver install

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    5. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by discogravy · · Score: 1

      not all computers have a CD drive, and it's a bit of a pain in the ass to carry a burner around with you to burn stuff, while USB is pretty ubiquitous.

      although in general, i'd have to agree that for computer that all have CD drives, though, a CDR/RW is probably a better idea.

      these things would be a zillion times cooler if they could be made bootable -- you'd have a small linux distro that wouldn't necessitate installing anything on the system HD and it'd be with you wherever you went.

    6. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Umm, I've never seen a computer that was missing a CD drive, yet had a USB controller (except maybe embedded systems). I'd be cool with using CD-R/W, except they're better for doing one big save all at once instead of lots of little saves ("Oops, I made a typo. Guess I have to sit here waiting 10 minutes for the new copy to burn.") These things are really for replacing floppy disks.

      Also, for putting distros on these things, do you know of a BIOS that lets you boot off a USB storage device? I suppose you could use a regular floppy as a boot disk then load the filesystems off the storage device. You would either need a boot manager that can understand the USB mass storage device standard (good luck), or can boot a kernel off the floppy (wait about three minutes for this), then load up the filesystems from your keychain :)

      --
      Not a typewriter
    7. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Especially with win2000/XP automatic detection of USB devices it could be used as a effective delivery device for worm/virus packages to machines without or with protected email and Internet access.

      FUD. Or please explain how exactly you are going to get it to execute anything when plugged in? When you plug this in, it's like plugging in a CF memory card. XP might ask you whether you want to download pictures/music off it, but other than that its harmless.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    8. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be quite good for security, too - use it as you key repository, perhaps, and use pam to authenticate via checking the key rather than just username/password...

    9. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by foo+fighter · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how anything is executed by simply inserting the device. I didn't see that described in the article.

      Also, physical security is the first step in any computer security. If your maintenance people having access to your workers PCs is a security concern, these keys aren't going to affect that one way or another.

      If I was in maintenance and wanted your data, I wouldn't screw around with a key. I'd open up your system and take your hard disk, or just take the whole damn machine.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    10. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

      That's not much of a worry if you treat your employees with dignity and respect.

      I'm sure most big companies would rather subject employees to strip searches than treat them like professionals.

      Cat
      We scan your email for your own protection.

    11. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even through metal detectors with the phrase "Oh, my keys set it off".

      So you are assuming that if I just say "Oh, my keys set it off" then I can get through any metal detector?

    12. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      Umm, I've never seen a computer that was missing a CD drive, yet had a USB controller

      This is close. We sold thousands of these to a customer giving them away to parents of schoolkids, but it didn't sit in the bulky adapter. Pure USB front and back, no CD-ROM, no floppy. Just USB, modem, and ethernet. They support Wake-on-LAN and we burned fifty of these things at a clip using automated burning tools.

      Also, for putting distros on these things, do you know of a BIOS that lets you boot off a USB storage device?

      See above. You can actually specify USB storage device as the bootable device.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    13. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by yesthatguy · · Score: 2

      It's not out of the question at all. The devices have a small processor inside to allow them to work without drivers, and to appear as a hard drive. It would probably be completely trivial to make it show up as a CD-ROM drive instead, and stick an autoplay.inf on the thing. Most of the computers these days come configured to run the autoplay executable without question or notice, so you could run a small executable by just plugging the thing in.

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    14. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by jmauro · · Score: 2

      Most of the smaller laptops, like the Viao Picturebooks do not have a CD-Rom drive, but they do have one or two USB ports. And the do sort of boot off the floppy drive. The Picturebook's floppy drive connects via USB and it can boot off of it very easily. If the USB gizmo says its a drive, then it'd probably boot off of it as well. I don't really think the Viao could tell the difference. Most Bios's understand some part of USB, because the do have to interact with USB keyboards and mice. Adding a disk drive isn't that uncommon.

    15. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by acb · · Score: 2

      Some software (i.e., some Mac audio apps) uses "disk authorisation" as copy protection; i.e., it won't run unless a signed disk is attached. Which makes moving between your desktop and laptop a hassle. Format one of these, authorise it and you can take it between the two machines, using it as a universal dongle of sorts.

    16. Re:You've got to want this for size or coolness... by dev!null!4d · · Score: 1

      The HP e-pcs ( Grr what a dumbass name, e-pc... ) I have at work will boot off of USB. These pcs don't have a floppy drive so you can buy a USB one, not sure if it'll work with other storage devices though...

      --
      ~www.devnull.co.uk
  19. pretty cool but i don't need it... by laserjet · · Score: 2

    According to their specs, this thing runs "driverless" on Win98SE, Me, 2000, XP / Mac OS 8.6 ~ 10.1 / Linux 2.4. I assume that just means you mount it and you're good to go?

    One thing the specs didn't touch on was how many times the "drive" can be written to? I know that memory like this has a limited life, similar to a digital camera. I think this is a good idea, but it would be a pain to plug this thing in the BACK of the computer, just to access your work. (Yes, most computers still have the USB port in the back.)

    also, it's a pity that we are so close to usb 2.0 becoming a vialbe solution. I guess speed is not that important to most people, but i would prefer a firewire or USB2 keychain drive - the cost to build one would be about the same.

    So does this compete in the market with zip disks, cd-r's, floppy disks, clik! disks, and portable usb hard drives? seems like a pretty tight market to me...

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    1. Re:pretty cool but i don't need it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > According to their specs, this thing runs "driverless" on Win98SE, Me, 2000, XP / Mac OS 8.6 ~ 10.1 / Linux 2.4. I assume that just means you mount it and you're good to go?

      Yep. The generic USB support needed for the drives is built into these OSs as shipped. Earlier Win98 systems didn't have that USB support, so they need an explicit driver install to work with it.

    2. Re:pretty cool but i don't need it... by gorillasoft · · Score: 1

      So does this compete in the market with zip disks, cd-r's, floppy disks, clik! disks, and portable usb hard drives? seems like a pretty tight market to me...

      Yes, because it does not require a drive at every computer just to access the media.

  20. Driverless by interiot · · Score: 2, Redundant

    All USB drives are "driverless" because the USB spec details the interface to a "USB Mass Storage Device". Each OS only has to implement one USB storage device driver, and then all USB drives will work on it. Linux's can be found here.

  21. Buy those things locally by nweaver · · Score: 4, Informative

    Various companies make them (flash USB key drives), they are a VERY nice solution for sneakerneting, however the reliability sometimes SUCKS (typical consumer grade, not tested before shipping).

    We ordered 2 of em from a different company, one worked fine and dandy, the other had a bad connection somewhere internally and would crash the USB bus and only mount about 1/8 of the time. They were $80 each for 64 MB versions (a good price, mind you), but next time, we will only buy locally, so that returns can be much easier.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  22. Drivers built into OS by RobertGraham · · Score: 4, Informative

    USB defines a generic storage device. A wide range of products, from actual harddrives to pseudo-drives can be used without any *additional* device drivers. This is why Win98 needs an update -- it didn't come with the generic storage device drivers.

    1. Re:Drivers built into OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid moron. That's not what it means. It means that Windows 98 is _NOT_ USB compliant!!!!

  23. Where are the keys? by MrWinkey · · Score: 1

    If you thought lost keys were bad before just wait! Now you can lose the car keys and the Laptop HD all at the SAME TIME!. Please order today and for only 3 easy payments of 299.99 it can be yours today!

    --
    Vote early. Vote often. Vote CowboyNeal.
    1. Re:Where are the keys? by Xoro · · Score: 1

      If you thought lost keys were bad before just wait! Now you can lose the car keys and the Laptop HD all at the SAME TIME!.

      But if you lose your keys with this thing, you can just grep them.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
  24. Loss & theft prevention/deterence by Mannerism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if there's any security mechanism for these things to discourage theft and protect the data in the event of loss. Imagine how many lunch hour thieves would wander through the office pulling these things out of USB ports otherwise.

    1. Re:Loss & theft prevention/deterence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M-Systems (?) DiskOnKey thing is supposedly getting a built-in thumbscanner at some future revision. That was from a recent magazine... either PC Mag or Maximum PC, forget which. Anyway, one could easily see JMTek doing something similar at some point.

    2. Re:Loss & theft prevention/deterence by hardburn · · Score: 1
      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:Loss & theft prevention/deterence by willow · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm using DriveCrypt on my 16MB USB pendrive to store private/sensitive data in a virtual encrypted drive. I like this product because you can install the encryption drivers right on the USB pendrive itself and use it on any system without installing the encryption drivers. When mounting the the encrypted drive the driver asks for the password and I'm AOK as long as I don't share the encrypted drive.

      If my pendrive is stolen I at least know that my private data is unusable.

      --
      Moderation in everything, including moderation.
  25. Christ in a squeeze-bottle by hatless · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These are teensy little flash memory cards with USB connectors and IDE-over-USB emulation like most of today's flash-memory technologies.

    The prices are the same or a smidgen higher than the same size CompactFlash, Smartmedia, Memory Stick or MMC cards.

    And they've been out for more than a year, though the 512MB and 1GB models are pretty recent. The idea is they're an alternative to shuttling a small batch of files around on a Zip disk or such, or burning a CD.

    As for actual hard drives, for half that $900 figure you can get a PC Card drive for your laptop that holds 5GB though like IBM Microdrives it's obviously a bit more delicate. And you can get pocket-sized 30GB Firewire and USB 2 drives for the same $400 or so these days.

    What doesn't get posted to Slashdot these days? When will we be hearing about someone discovering Dim Sum? Or asking for resources on learning how to drive a stick-shift?

    1. Re:Christ in a squeeze-bottle by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      This is a good page with rejected stories. There are others.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  26. shabby transfer rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice the data transfer rates? Is that a limitation of USB or the drive itself?

    The AC.

  27. kinda nice for on site repair specialists... by Atticka · · Score: 0, Interesting

    carry all the tools of your trade on your key-chain.....never leave home without your full set of tools and apps! no more CD's to lug around.

    --
    No sig here...
  28. Geeky Lamentations by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Shit! I just gouged my keychain drive with my Leatherman tool!
    • Man, all I did was just sat down my 1GB pocket drive got crushed--there goes $900!

    Sounds like a good, cynical business model--very fragile yet expensive products target-marketed to savvy techies with high disposable incomes.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:Geeky Lamentations by Quizme2000 · · Score: 2

      Hell I keep complete sets of spare keys at and at work, I would lose or misplace my keys once or twice a month when on call. What about a plastic cap to protect the connector prongs. I could deal with(well almost) losing the 8Mb $40 dollar gizmo, but $899 I would have to take out some insurence for it. For perspective, Gold bullion is about $280 a troy .oz, I'll just keep using my compact USB/Firewire 20 gig drive for that price.

      Drop keys

      --
      "Get them before they get....
  29. Uh by Andorion · · Score: 1

    Since when does McAfee produce hardware?

  30. some downsides by ageitgey · · Score: 3, Informative
    The read speed is 800kbytes/sec and the write speed is 500Kbytes/sec. They sound cool and all, but thats just like a glorified CDRW.


    I can already stick a cdrw in my pocket :)

    --
    Uninnovate - Only the finest in engineering.
    1. Re:some downsides by Keighvin · · Score: 1

      At 500kb/s write times this will take 1/2 an hour to fill up completely. Probably a little slower since it uses a relatively simple memory management app, like most PDAs: get'em to within a 1/Nth of their available memory and they start to crawl.

      --
      Any spoon would be too big.
    2. Re:some downsides by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      That's a limitation of the USB Bus, the things are just slow. I bought a 10gig external USB drive, but never use it because of that.

      On the other hand, there is a faster version of the USB bus out now, maybe they'll start upgrading and make these things truly useful.

      (If you're just trying to bring home things you downloaded at work, it's a great idea since you're probably not downloading much faster than you could write)

    3. Re:some downsides by strictnein · · Score: 1

      The read speed is 800kbytes/sec and the write speed is 500Kbytes/sec. They sound cool and all, but thats just like a glorified CDRW.

      might want to read that again:
      Correct Read and write speeds:
      over 1MB/sec (read)
      800 KB/sec (write)

  31. Ho Hum, not the first by Amokscience · · Score: 2

    M-Systems DiskOnKey seems to offer the exact same features. They're great geek gifts since they cost around $40-$50 for a 16MB version and, like this product, don't need drivers (except for win98). Works fine with MacOS9 and X and Linux.

    Importantly, you could have been buying them for the last year instead of having to wait until the 20th of this month. I love mine, beats using a floppy anyday (although you'll want to get a couple USB extender cables unless you're lucky enough to have frontside USB ports).

    http://www.diskonkey.com/

    --
    Fsck cluebie moderators. I'll say what I want, offtopic or not. And fsck having to qualify every bloody statement just
  32. As opposed to a CD ROM by Polanstaf · · Score: 1


    $600 for 512 MB (Keychain)

    compared to

    $0.25 cents for 640 MB (CD-Rom)

    Enjoy, gadget freaks. I think I'll keep slipping my backups into my coat pocket instead of my jeans.

    1. Re:As opposed to a CD ROM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you still be using CDR in two years? Five? Ten? What will you be using? Do you have a laptop? A PDA? A watch?

      A key chain, perhaps?

  33. I don't seethis as an incredible advance... by mecredis · · Score: 2, Informative
    but the 16, 32 and 64MB models are all under $100
    Realistically, this is pretty much the same as a SmartMedia flash card. I got a 64mb card for $45 the other day. Plus, Flash doesn't have any moving parts, and is pretty much resistant to shock.

    I guess I'll just wait till the $900 1gb model comes down in price...

    Anyone remember how great the Iomega ClickDrive was supposed to be? Now its just another portable pseudo-flash medium.

    --Fred
    --
    "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public." - H.L. Mencken
  34. Perhaps "Generic Drivered"? by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It appears that it uses some form of generic disk storage protocol.

    In recent Linux releases, there is a USB_STORAGE driver that can be included in the kernel; I would presume that's what they're referring to, at least vis-a-vis Linux support.

    It's entirely likely that three years ago, W98 didn't include drivers for disk storage devices, thus meaning that if you want to use the device with W98, you need such a "generic driver."

    Similarly, Windows NT 4 is getting pretty old; it likely didn't include support for USB storage devices either.

    In a sense, this may be regarded kind of like having SCSI support. You do need a SCSI driver to access SCSI devices, but once you've got that, there's no special driver for Seagate drives as compared to Quantum or IBM...

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    1. Re:Perhaps "Generic Drivered"? by duckie13 · · Score: 1

      Guess that's why only Win 98SE is supported. From the page:

      OS Support
      Win 98SE/Me/2000/XP
      Mac OS 8.6 ~ 10.1
      Linux 2.4

      This sounds like a pretty good idea to backup my webserver's files on, along with some other code of mine that I really don't want to lose and don't trust on a floppy anymore. Too bad it's a lil on the expensive side for my cheapass.

      --
      "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
    2. Re:Perhaps "Generic Drivered"? by jumpingfred · · Score: 3, Informative

      Win NT dose not support USB at all in any way shape or form.

    3. Re:Perhaps "Generic Drivered"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win98 RTM didn't support USB. That's one of the main reasons why MS released Win98SE.

      WinNT 4.0 does not support USB.

    4. Re:Perhaps "Generic Drivered"? by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      Oh? You obviously didn't see the video that was taken a bit before win98 came out (RTM) where someone was demo'ing it in front of a LOT of people (including press..) where they were showing off the usb support.. plugged in a scanner, and win98 bluescreened.

      That was not Win98SE.

      .

    5. Re:Perhaps "Generic Drivered"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now why is it that we think that MS is a group of mafioso that likes to extort money from people?

  35. Speed by staili · · Score: 2, Informative

    Data Access Rate:
    over 1MB/sec (read)
    800 KB/sec (write)

    So reading/writing that 1GB would take.. ummmm... forever.

    1. Re:Speed by magarity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      20 minutes to completely fill the thing. But I don't think the target market isn't supposed to max the capacity each time it's used. Meanwhile, it looks a little sturdier and scratch-resistant compared to a CD-R... That's a little slow but we may be spoiled: consider that it's twice the speed of an RLL hard drive. Wait a year or two and that speed will double. Meanwhile early adopters can buy this current model and fund the company until faster technology becomes available for the rest of us.

    2. Re:Speed by qwerty823 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... doing some simple math.

      1GB = 1024 * 1024 KB = 1048576 KB

      1048576 KB @ 800KB/sec = 1310.72 secs or

      21 mins and 50.7 secs

      To copy a 1gig file under linux (from the same fs to the same fs) took 5:37. Doesnt seem quite so slow to me, considering.

    3. Re:Speed by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the world of USB. Still faster than a bloody floppy. And, better still, it's not a frackin' Zip disk. Iomega can bite my arse.

      --
      :wq
  36. hope it's waterproof by Patersmith · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I'd hate to send my portable storage device through the washing machine by accident if it's not...

    1. Re:hope it's waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or sit on it.

    2. Re:hope it's waterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I accidentally sent one through the wash once and it worked.

      Anonymous for a reason

  37. the real use... by Dizzo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Take your pr0n everywhere!

  38. Others have been out for a while by coldmist · · Score: 1

    but maybe not with Linux support.

    usbdrive
    thumbdrive
    "Q" drive

    --
    Don't steal. The government hates competition.
    1. Re:Others have been out for a while by KarmaPolice · · Score: 1

      Uhm, the usbdrive.com link seems kinda redundant since this is the link in the article!!!

      Did you read beyond the headline before posting??

  39. End of floppies? by hardburn · · Score: 2

    Could this at last be the end of crappy, unreliable floppy drives that haven't grown since the days of the 40 MB hard drive? Oh please, oh please, oh please . . .

    --
    Not a typewriter
    1. Re:End of floppies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I found that packet-writing CD-Rs meant the end of floppies for me - who cares about deleting something, when you've got 500 times the space.

  40. portable-pr0n? by CoreDump · · Score: 2
    from the portable-pr0n dept
    I can see it now:

    Is that a keychain in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

    --

    ---
    Segmentation Fault ( core dumped )

    1. Re:portable-pr0n? by Erasei · · Score: 1

      And what's even scarier, CoreDump sits right behind me at work.. I think its time to brush up on my resume!

      --
      visit my free wallpaper collection, wp.erasei.com
  41. Fark.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't I just see this on http://www.fark.com like 3 days ago?

  42. Great place to store an encrption key by cs668 · · Score: 1

    I have always thought that one of these combined with the international kernel patch would make a great security tool.

    Put the key for your encrypted filesystem on the usb drive and you cant even tell someone our password. All you have to do is destroy the usb drive and you can't even get to your data.

  43. Yup... write a Group Policy Object by Llama+Keeper · · Score: 2

    You can easily disable the ability of a standard user to write to a USB device by using Group Policies. I'll have to go look it up, but there is an entry in the templates to disable seperate hardware devices. Just shut off the USB ports.

    --


    Rule of Life Number 2: Remember, it can all go to hell at any minute. --Jimmy Buffet
  44. Good idea, but the've been out for awhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I first heard about these almost two years ago IIRC.

  45. make your own by austad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Grab yourself a Sandisk SDDR-31 CF reader, cut it apart. Buy a USB plug from digikey, cut off most of the cable and solder the new plug very close to the rest of the the part you ripped out. Buy yourself an IBM 340MB ($155) or a 1G ($310) microdrive. Plug it into the pins on the connector you ripped out of the CF reader.

    Make yourself a cheap mold out of a little plastic container with a hole cut in the side for the USB plug to stick out of, put your electronics in it and fill it with that 2 part polymer stuff. Instant pocket 1G drive, for under $350.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:make your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Voila`! A big ugly piece of crapola that won't fit in your pocket.

    2. Re:make your own by -brazil- · · Score: 3, Funny

      You have a very... interesting definition of "instant"...

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    3. Re:make your own by lynchmenow · · Score: 1

      Remember that Sony eMarker thing that never took off? It was keychain size, had a USB connector and a rudimentary LCD display. I suppose you could use one of those as a starting point. Hmmm...since I have one, I may see about looking into that.

    4. Re:make your own by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

      If you only have two systems that you spread your data across, buy two compact flash readers (or smart media readers) and just use a CF card (or SM card).

      If you have a system that doesn't have USB, but does have a floppy, use the SM option. You can buy an adapter that lets a system read an SM card in a floppy drive.

      If you have a notebook without USB, use the CF option. Buy a CF - pc card adapter.

      Either of these options will let you expand your CF / SM "drive" with new memory as the market changes. It also lets you spread your data across different cards if you have to. It also works as a beautiful add-on for digital cameras that don't support USB.

      The down side is that CF and SM cards don't have a little loop on them for your keychain.

    5. Re:make your own by dhamsaic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You mother fucking pimp, you.

      Have you hit the karma cap yet?

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    6. Re:make your own by dhamsaic · · Score: 2

      Cool. I needed to burn some karma.

      I'm at 47 - hit me again!

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
  46. Months even, PenDrive w/Linux support, even by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Check 'em out here

    Suport Windows ME/2000/XP, Mac OS (ver. 8.6 or above) and Linux kernel version 2.4.0 or above without driver.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  47. If I buy two... by mcj · · Score: 1

    ...can I use them as an $1800 portable RAID array?

    "Oops, I stepped on my drive...good thing it's mirrored!"

  48. Encryption Key by Cortek · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could store one hell of an encryption key on that keychain.

    How many bit encryption would that be?

    1. Re:Encryption Key by infiniti99 · · Score: 2

      Well, at 8 bits per byte, that would be 8 billion bits I suppose. That number of bits is uncountable in a lifetime, but the value it could represent probably doesn't even have an english equivalent.

      32 bits = ~4 billion values
      64 bits = 4 billion x 4 billion (does this even have a word?)
      96 bits = 4 billion x 4 billion x 4 billion (holy freaking)
      128 bits = 4 billion x 4 billion x 4 billion x 4 billion (IPv6 addressing? aieee!)

      Well, you get the idea. And I stopped at 16 bytes!

    2. Re:Encryption Key by leuk_he · · Score: 2

      does this even have a word?

      weel try this one:
      http://www.alcyone.com/max/reference/physics/prefi xes.html

      wouldn't that be exallion values?

      But i think a better look at encryption will prove that more bytes is not better securty above a vertain point. (For DES i know this)

    3. Re:Encryption Key by cowtamer · · Score: 1

      Actually, that'd be quite handy for a One Time Pad.

  49. Re: More for less... by Random+Feature · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Terapin Mine Handheld is under $550 from ThinkGeek and it has 10GB of space. Connectivity via USB, 10Mbps Ethernet, PCMCIA.

    Also has stereo audio and (still) video out.

    Why pay $900 for this when you can have so much more for less?

    --
    I don't have a solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
  50. Bulletin from Lawrence Livermore by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Today the missing drive with atomic secrets was found behind a Garfield coffee mug in an employee breakroom.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Bulletin from Lawrence Livermore by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      No, the article said it was a keychain drive. You never find your keys behind the Garfield mug. They're always between the couch cushions.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    2. Re:Bulletin from Lawrence Livermore by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Thank God it wasn't left in the laptop containing all known weaknesses in National security that disappeared yesterday. Or the laptop with the NORAD blueprints on it that was "misplaced" last weekend.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  51. I'll be impressed... by deebaine · · Score: 2

    This is very cool. But it is only one component that I need alongside my Leatherman. When they can put my 21 inch monitor on my keychain, then I'll be impressed.

    -db

    1. Re:I'll be impressed... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It's simple man, just fold it up first.

      What? You mean all those e-paper stories were just stupid vaporware all that time? :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:I'll be impressed... by eaolson · · Score: 1
      This is very cool. But it is only one component that I need alongside my Leatherman. When they can put my 21 inch monitor on my keychain, then I'll be impressed.

      Heck, you can do that now. I'm not saying it won't be heavy, but you can do it.
  52. What about flash? by jmv · · Score: 2

    OK, 1GB *might* be interesting, but for smaller sizes (16-128MB), I don't see the gain over flash memory. Did I miss anything?

    1. Re:What about flash? by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Yup. The lack for a separate reader, i.e. the "plug and play" convenience factor.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

  53. What a crock! by pi+radians · · Score: 1

    "USB ports allow the fastest data transfer"

    Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahaha h.

    That's funny. What? They're serious?

    Hahahahahahahahahha

    --

    sin(6cos(r)+5A)
  54. IBM Microdrive by uslinux.net · · Score: 2
    Personally, I prefer IBM's marketing of their MicroDrive.

    http://65.119.30.151/productimage/22-147-001-01.JP G

  55. Can we boot from these? by mikey504 · · Score: 1

    Are there any BIOS's out there that support a "boot from USB device" option?

    The "Linux on Keychain" distribution is just around the corner!

    It would be great to be able to carry around a small distro for testing and/or security audit purposes. Consultants should snap these up.

  56. Physical robustness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Does anyone have any info regarding the physical robustness of these products? Can you drop them? Throw them against a wall? Can you get data off them after you've run over them with your car?

    How about the technology behind them....how, specifically, do they work?

    Thanks

  57. Use case by First+Person · · Score: 2

    This is a good way to store all those 4096 bit keys with your physical ones. Just don't lose that ring!

    --
    Given one hour to live, the student replied: "I'd spend it with professor FP who can make an hour seem like a lifetime."
  58. Why? by ajiva · · Score: 1

    Why would I want one, when a USB CF reader is $20, and a 1gb IBM Microdrive is $300? I can get 3 times the storage and still have the "driverless" feature
    they are touting.

  59. works on audrey? by levendis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone know if this will wokr on the 3Com Audrey? I haven't been able to find out if generic USB storage devices work on QNX...

    --
    ---- I made the Kessel Run in under 11 parsecs.
  60. some REALLY cool usage :) by Bandman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just thought of something REALLY cool :)

    Suppose you and a friend have sensitive data, and you ONLY want yourselves to have access to it. Here's what you do...

    Get a USB hub and 2 of these, hook them both up to a linux box, then use RAID to span a partition across them. That way, you can ONLY get the information when both of you are there, and anyone wanting it would have to steal/kill both of you to get it. It makes it a bit more harder brings you that much closer to Mission Impossible :)

    1. Re:some REALLY cool usage :) by mikeee · · Score: 2

      Er, No.

      They'll be able to recover bits and pieces, most likely all of the data if you span the drives. And if your mirror them it's obviously pointless.

      This could be made to work as you describe (use one key as a One-Time-Pad XOR for the other), but it's not quite that easy. :)

    2. Re:some REALLY cool usage :) by mlk · · Score: 1

      I think using a split key would be a better idea.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:some REALLY cool usage :) by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 2

      Well it would work if the data was encrypted as well as being spanned across the devices. Retrieving the bits and pieces from one of the devices would be meaningless.

      Probably not all that practical, and there are better ways, but a cool idea none-the-less... :)

      One better way would be to have the private key spanned across the two devices, then there could be as much data to retrieve as you like on the disk, but you'd need both devices to unlock it.

      All funky stuff - then again, if I was going that route, then I'd rather have something even smaller, such as iButton or something. :)

      -- Pete.

  61. Speaking of "driverless"... by sheetsda · · Score: 1, Redundant
    In reference to this page,
    top of the page:
    No Drivers are required.

    bottom of the page:
    * Windows 98 Drivers will be available for download

    Anyone want to explain that one to me? My best guess is that Win98 doesn't support USB drives.

    1. Re:Speaking of "driverless"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guessed right. Early Win98 didn't have the generic USB support built-in, like the other (later) OSs do.

  62. Why doesn't everything work like this? by roystgnr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are USB scanners with great Linux drivers, for instance... but they're not in the majority, because every damn scanner company has to solve the "tell the scanner to scan something and give me the image back" problem with their own half-assed protocol.

    This isn't just a Linux thing, too - don't you love it when, running Windows, you can just have a piece of hardware start working without you futzing around with separate driver disks? The only way that happens is when the hardware significantly predates your version of Windows (i.e. not often) or when it follows some standard that Windows already knows how to support. It's so much more fun to install a new hard drive (even internally) than, say, a new video card.

    Video cards, at least, are advancing by leaps and bounds and so have an excuse for rapidly changing hardware protocols. But scanners? Webcams?

    1. Re:Why doesn't everything work like this? by Anonymous+C0wherder · · Score: 1
      running Windows, you can just have a piece of hardware start working without you futzing around with separate driver disks

      It wasn't always like this sonny. Back in my day...

  63. I've got a 128MB DiskOnKey - these rock! by jht · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just recently started using a DiskOnkey (the 128MB model), and it's a terrific device. They cost about $150 each, and it's about 50% longer (and about 5 or so mm wider) than the Leatherman Micra I carry on my keychain, just to give you a size idea. There are smaller devices (like the Q Drive), but the DiskOnKey is rugged as hell, and so far has stood up to quite the beating.

    What's it good for? Well, in my case, I'm using it to hold a set of Windows sysadmin tools (a VNC installer, Terminal Server client software, and a few other utilities), along with a full electronic copy of my company DR plan, and a ton of policy/procedure documents. With all that, I still have room to shuttle files around as well.

    In fact, it's been so handy that we're replacing our printed copies of many off-site manuals with these. That way, it's much easier to keep up-to-date, and all we need to access everything is a computer with USB support and the ability to read HTML, PDF, and Word documents.

    The coolest thing I found is that they're bootable, too - I just need to put an OS on one and it's an even better toolkit. Is the storage as cost-effective as CD-ROM? Of course not - it doesn't hold nearly as much, and the 128MB device, as I mentioned, cost $150. But it's far more rugged than a CD, and can be used in all sorts of circumstances where a CD can't. Heck, even a lot of the stripped-down PCs that are used in corporate IT shops have free USB ports.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  64. Read the Specs ! SSSLLLLOOOWWW Drive ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More closely !

    see :
    Data Reading/Writing speed
    over 1MB/sec. - 800Kbytes/sec

    My guess is 1 Gig is 1024 Meg ?

    =Filling the key would take 1280 seconds, a small 21.33 minuts.

    Hmmm.
    Friends of mine could burn 4-5 cds in the time.
    Of course you have to have a burner.

    But for $900, I could even buy 2 and put one at the office and one at home...

    Well, being pessimistic again 8)

  65. The Thumbdrive by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 1

    Last year I reviewed a Trek Thumbdrive (64MB) (no link because I no longer speak to the website I was working for at the time :))

    My verdict was basically: Nifty, sysadmins might be able to find a use for them... I can't see anyone elsehaving much use for one though.

    and as some other people have stated, yes, it's a bitch to plug the things in blind.

    1. Re:The Thumbdrive by linuxelf · · Score: 1

      Just get one of these

      --
      - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
  66. They are quite useful by Ibby · · Score: 1

    I bought one of these units (64 meg) a few months back. It sat for quite a bit, but lately it's seen a good amount of use. Nice to see the price has come down as well. The best part is the size. When I purchased mine, 2 gig were apparently available, but they were out of stock, and they were prohibitively expensive.
    The size is the best part. They even fit quite nicely in a pocket protector...

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
    1. Re:They are quite useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They even fit quite nicely in a pocket protector

      God help us.

  67. If you need carry-around storage... by Kaa · · Score: 2

    I don't know about keychains, but a regular part of my bag is a small box (say 5 x 3 x 0.75 in) that just plugs in (via cable) into any USB port. USB 2.0 capable and all in all cost about $200. I am quite happy with it.

    Eh? What? Size? Oh, it's 20 Gb :-)

    Actually, this is just a box with IDE &lt-&gt USB electronics into which you can put any standard laptop hard drive (and I put a 20Gb one in). Draws power from the USB port and is truly plug-and-play. Highly convenient. Recommended.

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  68. Back in my days we had hardcards by t0qer · · Score: 1

    You young whippershnappers have no idea how easy you have it. Back in my day if you needed portable storage that went beyond a floppy we used hardcards. They were full sized ISA bus cards with a 20 to 80 meg hard drive attached. None of this newfangled USB, hot swappable plug and play for us.

    I remember transferring lots of files this way. It was fun.

  69. Pefect if Devices Could use it for Storage by puppetman · · Score: 1

    An mp3-player with a USB slot, a digital camera with a USB slot, a Palm with a USB slot.

    I mean, my 64 meg in my digital camera's compact flash cards are useless in my mp3 player (64 meg internal, and SmartMedia external). While using my camera, the 64 meg in my mp3 player is useless.

    Most storage is used for temporary data. Would be nice to share that storage.

    I don't expect that Palm, Nikkon, HP, Diamond, etc will radically change their products interfaces as a result of this one product, but it's nice to dream.

  70. Or.. by MrTilney · · Score: 1

    Try an alternate browser.
    Does that wool get itchy?

  71. Ignant Question of the day by Uttles · · Score: 1

    So someone explain to me how this driverless thing works... how could you mount it in Linux? Windows?...

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Ignant Question of the day by mlk · · Score: 1

      Driverless means 'shipped with by default'.
      It's like all VGA gc's could be called 'driverless' as they'll "just work" in Windows/Linux.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  72. price changed by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Redundant

    The price on the website cited for the 1G USB drive is $700, not $900.

    1. Re:price changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please more more misinformation using your +1 bonus. We all want to make sure we don't miss any of your special drivel. BTW, I didn't get a chance to respond to one of your previous postings. Turns out you aren't a complete fucktard all day every day. Now if only you could figure out when that is.

  73. ACK! Sorry! by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    I was wrong. Doh!

  74. Overlooked. by aurorascope · · Score: 1

    I'm particularly surprised no-one has mentioned the iPod yet. Yes, I know it's Apple, and, that it was intended to be used on a Mac (and primarily as a music device, too).

    Mediafour are creating software that will allow the iPod to interface with windows (no mention of Linux, though). Basically it will act just like a glorified hard drive. Here's the article. It's $400, come on! There are Firewire -> USB adapters doing the rounds anyway, so surely you could curtial $900. Oh, and the iPod's the size of a pack of cards.
    -

    --

    I'd rather have a bowl of coco-pops.
    1. Re:Overlooked. by mlk · · Score: 1

      Having either a iPOD or one of these the size of a keyring, firewire, 1Gb+ and can play MP3's would be cool. Esp if Apple made it ( from the 'looking pritty' POV ).

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  75. Re: More for less... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    There is also the iPod at 5Gig and costs 399 USD. The catch is that you need firewire on your computer, but still you get a music player as a bonus. On the other hand the iPod, and even the Terapin Mine Handheld are a tad larger than a key ring.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  76. GnuPG and Whisper32 by LinuxHam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I, too, have the IBM 8MB model. First of all, its AWESOME for storing my GnuPG keyring, and my Whisper32 password file. I finally feel like I'm doing GnuPG the right way.. like the extremists keeping the floppy in their pocket, inserting it only at the moments you need it for encrypting/decrypting. Now to move my critical private files to my pure USB PC and gpg 'em. Should make for a secure, console-access file server.

    For the remaining 7.8MB, I keep a bunch of small files that I would need most when I don't have my Thinkpad around -- my Notes ID file, some presentations that I've been working on for clients, and all the things I forget to save when I blow away the laptop.. the ethernet and modem drivers for one! (That's a mean catch-22) I also keep small installers that often give me trouble when downloading.. putty, AdAware spyware removal tool, Netscape 6 installer, LeetSpeak for genning passwords, Whisper32, and AIM95N.

    Please people, stop comparing it to a PDA. They don't serve the same purpose at all.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
    1. Re:GnuPG and Whisper32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jackson
      --------------------
      Shortwinded fool,
      Blithering idiot.

    2. Re:GnuPG and Whisper32 by no_such_user · · Score: 2

      The problem: you're still not safe if the machine you're using isn't 100% trusted, i.e.: a corporate desktop. There's nothing to say that once plugged in, the key can't be copied from this device to a local drive by a background process. Or, even innocently copied into a non-secure cache.

      OTOH, if we could use this in conjunction with some sort of encrypted FS, our designated safe dir (or the whole partition if you'd like) can only be accessed when this "key" is inserted. That'd be kinda nice (though I'm not trying to push this as an alternative to the above key store - it's just as risky on an untrusted machine).

  77. However... by anticypher · · Score: 1, Troll

    Note that these drives only work on micro~1.oft's version of USB.

    There is a spec for USB Mass Storage Device, but M$ does not support it. In fact, any USB device manufacturer who wants access to M$'s proprietary USB storage API libraries has to agree not to support the MSD in any of their products (under normal circumstances, that would be illegal abuse of a monopoly position).

    The USB world (i.e. mostly taiwanese and chinese manufacturers) is neatly divided into two camps. About 90% make M$ proprietary USB products, the remaining 10% make products that correspond to the official USB spec. If you have a clued-in taiwanese computer shop in your area, you can get them to order USB compliant devices instead of M$ proprietary shit.

    These little drives work on some Macs as well, since Apple licensed the micro~1.oft USB drivers and APIs, so they could take advantage of the market force M$ has dominated. The proprietary USB license adds between $2 and $3 to the end price of each macintosh.

    If you want to have some fun, plug a USB/MSD compatible hard drive into an XP machine. Although XP claims to have no knowledge of the Mass Storage Device specification, there is enough of a driver for windoze to reformat the drive with an NT5FS file system. As a bonus, it doesn't even bother asking the user, it just reformats, every single time.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    1. Re:However... by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Why does the page say that they work in recent windows and Linux 2.4 then?

      I think you must have erred somewhere. I don't see two versions offered.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:However... by WhyCause · · Score: 1

      All Right... Enough.

      I'm calling bullshit on this one until I see some references. Real references. Not "my buddy Joe's webpage" either.

      It's one thing to dislike a company or their products. It's an entirely different matter to make stuff up becuse "it's right"

  78. But how long can it last until.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We start seeing "secure" versions of them that wont let us copy our MP3s and stuff.

    I just sayin.

  79. Thank God... by kiley · · Score: 1

    Now I can take my 1 GB encryption key through the airport on my keychain.

  80. great... by mrroot · · Score: 1

    now everywhere I go, I'll have my pr0n collection with me on my keychain.

    ...I can't wait until they come out with a 10GB version!

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
  81. Irony by ruvreve · · Score: 1

    From their website

    Top of Page:
    "No Drivers are required. "

    Bottom of Page:
    "* Windows 98 Drivers will be available for download"

    Am i missing something?

    1. Re:Irony by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I can't be bothered to look on the website, but it could be something along the lines of 'any old video card you plug into windows will boot to a 640x480x8 VGA desktop, but the drivers give you extra.' So the drivers probably give you nice names in the device manager, stuff like that, as opposed to 'Generic USB Harddrive.'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  82. GPG (PGP) key ring key ring? by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 2

    Could this be used as part of a crypto key management system?

    1. Re:GPG (PGP) key ring key ring? by bourne · · Score: 1

      Yup - that's why I plan to buy one. I've been waiting for one of these devices that looks like it works on Linux easily.

      Worried about your laptop being stolen and your private key being compromised? Keep it on your keychain, and plug it in when you need to do something securely.

  83. bootable usb solid state keys? by rangerx · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this usbdrive can boot operating systems. The DiskOnKey product line from m-systems say that they can boot systems, but I have had no luck with them so far. In order for it to work, you need a bios that boots from USB-HDD. I have a couple motherboards that do this, but there must be something else that I am doing wrong :(

    Has anyone played in this area and has been successful ?

  84. Bootable USB? by Snowfox · · Score: 2
    Is there such a thing as a BIOS supporting a bootable USB disk?

    It would be killer to use something like this as a drive on a fanless PC with a tiny Linux install.

    1. Re:Bootable USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet anouther case of stick it on FireWire (just like the 5Gb+ MP3 players).

    2. Re:Bootable USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yet anouther case of stick it on FireWire (just like the 5Gb+ MP3 players).

      USB is a bit more flexible/common though. USB 2.0 is also 20% faster.

    3. Re:Bootable USB? by aredubya74 · · Score: 1
      Damn, missed this before I posted my comment.

      That said, the latest PhoenixBIOS does support booting from a USB storage device.

      --

      RW

  85. New meaning by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

    This gives a whole new meaning to, "Oh #$%!ing #$%*&! I lost my keys!

    Were I to lose such a keychain, I'd be more concerned than if my car were stolen or destroyed. Goodness, my car isn't worth that.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  86. how about.... by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2

    ...a thingumbob[1] that does hardware RAID-0 on two of these things.[2] Then it's perfect.
    The fact is, I've a) become really really distrustful of all built-in hard-drives, after having like three or four of them fail (in two different home computers) within a two year period, two of them being "redundant" and failing at once, and not just the controller, and, what's more, with very clean power coming in. I just don't trust anything with moving parts anymore. Truth is, one gigabyte is more than enough for everything I need except media files, which don't need to be dynamically backed up (i.e. they only need one backup EVER, which is no-problem).
    Do you know what REAL security is? It's not in having a thirteen-character password with alphanumerics for root...what good is that if your file-system (hmmmm? ext2?) isn't encrypted? Anyone can break into your computer, steal your hard-drive (bad enough), then, to add insult to injury, read the bits off your partition, reconstruct all your personal files, and take up a long-distance relationship with your former girlfriend. Ouch.
    Anyway, real security isn't in having a long password: it's in having your hard-drive in your pocket when you leave your home. Plus, I think it would do us all good to have to constrain ourselves to a gigabyte...it would keep me from mindlessly copying huge directory structures to three or four places as version control, or a DVD that I'll only watch two or three times a month...wow, how useful that it's on my hard-drive? or all those CD images that I tell myself make it SO much more convenient to play these games that, really, I only get an opportunity to do a few times a month, and generally just be wasteful just because I "have the space"...it comes to bite you in the end, because there's no convenient way to do a backup. If you really need to copy whole CD's to hard-drive, do it on one mounted "spare" or "media" and keep it separate from your "real" (keychain USB) drive. Now if only linux could boot off USB as I hear a mac can....

    [1] that's the official word, not "thingamajig", according to my dictionary.
    [2] This is probably a ten-dollar piece of equipment. How hard can RAID-0 be? All you do is double every write and read request, and if you ever get a fail on any read or or write, start chirping like mad and somehow indicate which drive gave it to you. Of course, I'd hate to be the one writing the routine for what happens when the read of the two drives returns disparate bits...maybe you do a few more reads and if the drives stubbornly disagree about the state of the bit, ask the user, in the true linux fashion [whatever the equiviliant is to "Unable to read bit 4 of byte at F332D:2AAE4:F22A." with three buttons, one labelled one, one labelled zero, one labelled retry."] then ask him/her to replace whichever is the older one...

  87. Made our own! by krokodil · · Score: 3, Informative

    My Sony Clie have proggie called MS Import (MS=Memory Stick) which when running makes it
    behave like USB storage device. I just put my Memory Stick card into it, run this program, plug it via
    USB cable to Linux and I can mount it as SCSI drive,
    having access to all my files on it. Best thing about it, is that you can have several cards.

    Yes, it is bigger than keychain, but what the heck,
    I carry my PDA with me all the time anyway!

  88. Generic USB storage device, but... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    How would you mount such a device under a linux system?
    Would it appear as a FAT file system, like the USB digital cameras?

    .
    .

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  89. What in the HELL is Dim Sum? by filbo · · Score: 1

    Sounds like their ought to be an article about this "Dim Sum" because I've never heard about it. Is it open source? Will it run under Red Hat Linux? What about FreeBSD?

    Or is this a Microsoft product? Don't drop esoteric references like that and just leave us hanging...

    1. Re:What in the HELL is Dim Sum? by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

      Dim sum, AKA chinese dumplings, is not an esoteric reference, unless you're a redneck. But even a cracker like me knows what Dim sum is.

      Cat

    2. Re:What in the HELL is Dim Sum? by jpostel · · Score: 2

      I can only hope you are making an attempt at humor.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    3. Re:What in the HELL is Dim Sum? by filbo · · Score: 1

      Never mind. The point appears to have been lost on at least two people.

  90. Because nobody has a CF reader at other locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because when you travel to other locations (friend, business, relatives, whatever) they are not going to have a CF reader. Most will have a USB port, though.

    Of course, if you are only going to use this at home, it doesn't make sense. The whole point is that your data is easily portable and easily readable and writeable when you get to your destination.

    It's kind of like carrying a CD-RW, except you don't need to rely on having UDF software and a CD-RW drive at your destination. They just need a USB port and you are in business.

  91. Its good for MY security by skip277 · · Score: 1

    You know, I've always thought this was the perfect solution for MY security. I haven't done it yet but I plan on picking up the 8 or 16 meg one and storing my GPG secret key on it. Then its not on an internet connected machine where it can get swiped if the machine is rooted. I just have to make sure I have a GOOD passphrase in case I lose my keys. Actually if I was going to be REALLY paranoid about it I'd put an encrypted loopback filesystem on it and THEN put my key on it. That way I don't have to worry about someone getting my secret key if I lose my keys.

    --
    "False modesty is the refuge of the incompetent." - The Stainless Steel Rat
  92. OT: Moderator--wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever modded this down is smoking crack

    One drawback of NT is that it didn't natively support USB (like AGP). So this really IS ontopic

    I'm going to check my metamoderator options now. I hope others will do the same, or idiot moderators will continue to bring down slashdot...

    Please don't moderate unless you know wtf is going on

  93. great place to store keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When i first saw the IBM version of this nifty device my first thought was that it would be a great way to deal with all my ssh and gpg keys. Just pop it in and have autofs mount it when either program calls for them. Would be a great way to deal with shared roommate email boxes.

    I have not got my hands on one of these things, has anybody done this?

  94. Hello? I think we all know what he means. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter how much dignity and respect you treat your employees with, if you've got sensitive data do you want some Arab janitor dumping your info into his keychain and walking out right past security?

    1. Re:Hello? I think we all know what he means. by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

      If you treat your employees with dignity and trust they will ensure that the janitor will not have access to sensitive data. If my employer treats me like a turd I will certainly make it easier for said janitor. I've never worked in an environment where truly sensitive data could have been acccessed by a janitor and I think such speculation is specious at best.

      Cat

  95. Corporations will notice easily. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

    Corporations will have no problem. As soon as the user plugs the device in, the DMI software will automatically send an alert to management software saying "hey, I've detected an unauthorized device on computer 123456781. I've detected it as an Optical Mass Storage Device with serial number 933322331." We'll pop open the screen for that system, get the location of the machine and pay the user a friendly visit. Of course, it's possible the user has already gotten the data and is on his way out the door.

    It's the smaller shops that don't use or can't afford the management software that will have problems with this, as well as the companies that have lax desktop security standards and useless AUPs. In those cases, I suggest two-part epoxy. Epoxy the keyboard and mouse cables in (and reduce theft!), and epoxy nice sturdy plastic over the rest of the ports. Voila! With a lot of work, you can probably remove the cover to add devices or replace the mouse and keyboard, although it's probably easier cutting the cable and splicing the new one in.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Corporations will notice easily. by leuk_he · · Score: 2

      Ok, try it like this:
      the DMI software will automatically send an alert to management software

      Copy data to local HD. (It is there. or can XP/windows 2000 boot remote and still perform)
      Unplug network.
      copy data to little unauthorized device.
      Unplug device.
      Power down pc.
      Leave office.

      Do this before the weekend and even in a secure environment you have quite some time.

  96. Maybe OT-USB in general by mokyar · · Score: 0

    USB in general came in very promissing. But I think the expectations were too high and even though it fulfilled many of them, USB has not reached the peak, yet. Looks like the USB specs need to be improved. However, to see this kind of products gives me hope about USB.

  97. digital keys on physical keyrings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never liked the idea of putting a PGPG keys on a floppy disk (due to the limited capacity and general flakiness of the medium).

    Now it appears possible to keep a whole mess-o' public/private keys on a fob. Send and read secure email from any host.

  98. USB as boot disk? by aredubya74 · · Score: 1
    From what I understand, the latest rev of PhoenixBIOS can recognize USB drives and boot from them.

    I could see a pretty decent little business in doing diskless firewalls and routers using an LRP image or an EmBSD firewall image on a microATX x86 box. Just add the configuration files to your keychain, boot it and run in RAM. Sweet.

    --

    RW

  99. I *love* my Disk-on-Key by rootrot · · Score: 1

    I have a 32meg disk on key by M-Systems that is just outstanding. I use it all the time. I have two non-legacy laptops (TiBooks) and 2 non-legacy boxes (G4 tower and cube) and serveral pc boxes all sharing space in the house. While they are all networked, the ease at which you can move files of all sorts from machine to machine is just great...

    Beware, however, be certain to get one that is "driverless"...it makes all the difference...

    best,

    /ijk

  100. ... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    which means that the drives will work under Linux

    Thank you, captian obvious...

  101. a keychain? by Ayatollah · · Score: 1

    I'll buy mine as soon as they write "It's not a beer gut, it's a fuel tank for my love machine" on both sides.

    Duffman says, "Oh, yeah!"

  102. This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did everyone forget this coming out like almost a year ago or so? Called "Q drives" or something...they were even smaller than the pictures of this one!

  103. No different than floppies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this any different than the situation with floppies? (Besides the scale, I mean. Most things worth stealing that take a gigabyte in 2001, fit on a 3.5" floppy in 1989.)

  104. PS2 + Linux + USB Key by detritus. · · Score: 2

    This just occured to me.. Imagine the possibilities with this USB key when Linux comes out for the Playstation 2... 1 GB of instant removable storage.

    Anyone know what filesystem these keys use? It would definitely be an impressive hack if someone can get the PS2 to view it as a very big memory card. Or, vice versa, take a 8MB PS2 memory card and rig a USB adapter to it somehow for PC storage.. Just some ideas if anyone is bored..

  105. a portable 30 gb 2.5" USB drive by Qaseem · · Score: 1

    A friend bought one of those for $240 and he travels with it all the time. it fits in his shirt pocket and all he needs is a usb cable. To me this looks like a lot better deal than the $900 1GB keychain. the good thin is if you wish you could replace the 30GB disk with what ever capacity available. I am told 80 GB is the most at this time.

    --
    /-\ |-|
  106. Deals on this sort of thing. by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

    If anyone is interested in buying this sort of thing, I do remember seeing good deals on 64MB USB "drives" recently on the various "technology deals" websites. DealNews mentioned this one for $62 recently, and I think I remember seeing one for $49.95 mentioned on some site earlier this month.

  107. How many uses could this have? by ed1park · · Score: 1

    One thing that would be nice is the ability to plug this into a portable mp3 player.

    Or how bout digital cameras? Maybe even DV cams?

    PDA's? Cell phones (to easily transfer contact info, etc)?

    What other devices could take advantage of this?

  108. you're kidding yourself by markj02 · · Score: 1
    Unless you run a completely locked-down environment with preinstalled, restricted applications, secure hardware, and almost no Internet access, you are kidding yourself if you think that you can prevent information from leaking out that way. In fact, why would users even bother with USB keychains? They'd much more easily and less suspiciously arrange for an outside web site to exploit a security hole in IE and have the site download information through a secure channel through the corporate firewall. Much less suspicious, easily deniable, and less hassle.

    And if you lock down your environment so much, you may be able to have unskilled labor run the deep fryer, but you'll be keeping your knowledge workers from getting their job done. This kind of control freakish behavior is what drove people from mainframes onto PCs into the first place, and if you try to reinstitute mainframe-like controls on your PCs, your users will simply switch to other systems; you don't own them.

    Microsoft is great at giving system managers the illusion of security and control. But that attests more to the gullibility of their customers than to any kind of sound security technology.

  109. are you sure... by markj02 · · Score: 1
    that "autorun" is not enabled for this kind of removable device? It might be worth a try...

    In any case, I think the point is that a malicious or careless user might use this to transport a virus onto the corporate network. But since Windows is so vulnerable to mail and web attacks anyway, that's probably the least concern to system managers.

  110. Re:Made our own! (OT) by osiris · · Score: 1

    i was just wondering if you had found anyway to make your clie sync under linux? last i heard there wasnt any software to do it with the usb cradle.

  111. Re:Made our own! (OT) by krokodil · · Score: 1

    coldsync should do it.
    But I have not used it - I am using infrared.

  112. Re:Yup... write a Group Policy Object by mgv · · Score: 1

    The issue here is not whether or not it can be blocked, but the extra workload to do so.

    As it is a base install, every firm that is worried about this will have to install a policy against it. Undoubtedly, some will forget.

    Michael

    --
    There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  113. when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When can I hook one up to my playstation2? :>

  114. Physical access by hardburn · · Score: 1

    Physical access almost always means total access. I don't know of any OS that can get around that problem (although encrypted filesystems help to a degree). It's just something you have to live with.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  115. Safe around X-rays and magnetic fields? by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if it is safe to expose this technology to strong magnetic fields or X-rays? I'm especially worried about airport X-ray machines. I've noticed now that they want to X-ray your keyring, mobile phone, sometimes even your shoes. I can just picture myself trying to convince some airport security drone that my USBDrive isn't a weapon. I'm worried they might even try to confiscate it.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
  116. Re:ACK! Sorry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now this one.. ah yes, truly worthy of the +1 bonus this is. Not good enough to waste the valuable time of people with your original nonsense, I see. I'm cutting you some slack on this one, though, since you might be trying to make sure your "I'm an idiot" post is rated as high as the one where you proved it.

  117. i'll have to say it again... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 2, Funny

    is that some pr0n in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

  118. imagine a beowulf cluster..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...