Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Promotions Turn Up in USPS Offices

Several readers, like this Anonymous Coward, have written with links to a letter from Cliff Crouch on macintouch.com. "I stumbled across this letter submitted to a web site I frequent. Apparently Microsoft has promotional displays with free WindowsXP promotional software in U.S. Post Offices."

193 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. email and snail mail by Proud+Geek · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Well, they probably put it in the post office to capture back the customers they lost when their email went down from receiving too many files "to have your advice." They want to get a chance to recapture their customers when they head off to the post office to send their mail that way instead.

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

    1. Re:email and snail mail by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Well, they probably put it in the post office to capture back the customers they lost when their email went down from receiving too many files "to have your advice."

      But could it be that Microsoft is giving you WinXP "to have your advice" on it?

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
  2. Here's the reason by flynt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For better or worse, the US government is large. In fact, it is HUGE. It would be impossible for every decision to be internally consistent in any organziation this size. This is why you always see those exposes on ABC and the like saying Branch A of govt does this and that while Branch B seems to be doing someething flying in the face of it. Its not necessarily that the govt. are hypocrites, all it is is a aggregate of people like you and I. So in this case, its not really the worst thing in the world. And what happend to "innocent until proven guilty"?

    1. Re:Here's the reason by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what happend to "innocent until proven guilty"?

      MS has been proven guilty -- the only thing under review is what the penalty will be.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Here's the reason by MisterQueue · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the Postal Service isn't owned by the gov't, it is regulated by them but it works more like a franchise. Each sector is run by an owner who has to follow the regulations of the gov't who comes in and checks up regularly. (Sort of like a food inspection I suppose.) Only reason I know any of this is because my dad has been working for them for about 20 years now.

      -Q

      --
      "I was not put on this earth to listen to meat! Frylock..were you?" -Master Shake
    3. Re:Here's the reason by idiotnot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the Postal Service is wholly owned by the Government, but run as a private corporation. The Federal Government is the only shareholder, and thus elects the board, etc. etc. Government corporations are not at all uncommon....many cities and school divisions (colleges, too) operate exactly the same way.

    4. Re:Here's the reason by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      Hey, i think its just as idiotic that my post got to 5 as you do. I was just clarifying that MS is in (legal) fact guilty of crimes in the US. Has nothing to do with the USPS, only the original post i was replying to. It may have been rhetorical, but it sure seemed like he was saying they hadn't been proven guilty of anything yet (or that their guilt was being reevaluated, and thus they should be treated as innocent).

      My karma is still way above 50, so i can only lose, never gain :(

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:Here's the reason by mpe · · Score: 2

      Now here's where the comparison breaks down. It is impossible to arrest M$. Any specific person working for the corporation, sure, but the company can not be locked up.

      THis is one place where the idea of corporations as "people" breaks down. However it is possible to freeze any or even all assets of any entity. This might be a suitable castodial detention analogy.

      But while the punishment phase is under review in civil cases, the party being punished usually acts on their best behavior as regards the case they were found guilty under, so as to avoid additional punishment for continuing the acts under which they were charged.

      Also whilst the court case is ongoing they can be found to be "in contempt of court" and thus subject to very tough penalties.
      Carrying on regardless after being found guilty is a good way to show contempt.

    6. Re:Here's the reason by martinflack · · Score: 2

      Give me a BREAK!

      The USPS hasn't heard of the largest antitrust action in recent years??

      They have never promoted non-mail 3rd party products before - Someone in USPS Legal didn't have to approve the new MS signs? They didn't say, hey is this a dumb idea or what?

      This is a simple, blatant, disgusting case of "Money Talks".

      Sorry, but I'm saddened at such things from my government.

    7. Re:Here's the reason by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      I'm no fan of Microsoft's aggressive defense and expansion of their monopoly, but this isn't either.

      Is it inappropriate for the USPS to allow ANYONE to advertise at the post office? Yes, I think so.

      Does Microsoft taking a formerly "pristine", ad-free space and turning it into a commerce zone make me angry? Yes, as always.

      Does what they're doing have ANYTHING to do with illegal coercion or other anti-trust behaviors? Nope.

      If Sun and Oracle and Netscape had USPS displays, and Microsoft offered the USPS tons of money to sell XP - but *only* if they pulled down the other displays - *THEN* we're maybe talking anti-trust.

    8. Re:Here's the reason by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      However it is possible to freeze any or even all assets of any entity. This might be a suitable castodial detention analogy.

      Yes it is possible, but it isn't done automatically. If an individual is convicted of a crime they are put in jail to await sentencing. In the case of a corporation nothing is done while awaiting sentencing. Freezing assets can certainly be a part of the sentence, but I think the arguement here is that if a corporation is treated as a person the freeze should happen as soon as the corporation is found guilty, just as an individual would be put in jail immediately upon being found guilty.

      I'm not saying I agree with this idea. It has it's merits, certainly, but it definately has it's problems as well. Sudden and massive unemployment (at least in MS' case) is one that immediately comes to mind. Perhaps the frozen assets could be used to pay unemployment benefits to the former employees. I don't know, I'm just talking off the top of my head here. I think it's worth looking at, though.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    9. Re:Here's the reason by mpe · · Score: 2

      If an individual is convicted of a crime they are put in jail to await sentencing. In the case of a corporation nothing is done while awaiting sentencing.

      Indivuduals are frequently held in jails awaiting trial (and sometimes even whilst awaiting being charged with anything), if not held in jail an accused may have to make some kind of bail bond or be subject to movement restrictions or curfew. None of these are punishment, because at that point the accused have not been found guilty of anything.

      but it definately has it's problems as well. Sudden and massive unemployment (at least in MS' case) is one that immediately comes to mind.

      In which case the obvious option when a corporation breaks the law would be to treat them in the same was as a criminal (or terrorist) organisation. But no-one would use the excuse "going after Bin Landen, would cause too many civilan casualties".

    10. Re:Here's the reason by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      Indivuduals are frequently held in jails awaiting trial (and sometimes even whilst awaiting being charged with anything), if not held in jail an accused may have to make some kind of bail bond or be subject to movement restrictions or curfew.

      An individual can run away, thus escaping justice. Bail is usually set according to two things: the seriousness of the crime and the likelyhood of flight. I suppose it's theoretically possible for a Corporation to run away, but I don't know how.

      None of these are punishment, because at that point the accused have not been found guilty of anything.

      It's true that these penalties are not generally considered punishment, since, as you say, they haven't been found guilty of anything, but they often end up serving that purpose. Many convicted of misdemeanors are sentenced to "time served", plus perhaps a fine or community service.

      However, time served before a trial is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. We are talking about an entity which has already been convicted and is merely awaiting a reevaluation of their sentence. Name just one indiviudual who has been granted bail under those circumstances.

      In which case the obvious option when a corporation breaks the law would be to treat them in the same was as a criminal (or terrorist) organisation.

      The problem is, everyone who is a member of a criminal or terrorist is a criminal or a terrorist. Not everyone who is an employee of Microsoft is a monopolist. The vast majority of MS employees had no say in, or probably even knowledge of, MS' abusive business practices. How do you punish the company without punishing the totally innocent employees?

      no-one would use the excuse "going after Bin Landen, would cause too many civilan casualties".

      They would if he were in the US or Europe. Let's be honest here; it's not civilian casualties that are acceptable, it's Afghan civilian casualties.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    11. Re:Here's the reason by mpe · · Score: 2

      The problem is, everyone who is a member of a criminal or terrorist is a criminal or a terrorist. Not everyone who is an employee of Microsoft is a monopolist. The vast majority of MS employees had no say in, or probably even knowledge of, MS' abusive business practices

      Since criminal and terrorist organisations often have "legitimate fronts" and use perfectly legitimate businesses for various things then it's quite possible for there to be many people involved with such organisations which are perfectly "innocent". (If they are good enough to fool law enforcement then its perfectly likely theyc an fool their own employees.)
      Whereas with Microsoft just about everyone who works for them is likely to know exactly who they work for...

    12. Re:Here's the reason by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      Since criminal and terrorist organisations often have "legitimate fronts" and use perfectly legitimate businesses for various things then it's quite possible for there to be many people involved with such organisations which are perfectly "innocent".

      And yet these innocents are still not terrorists or criminals, merely employees of someone who is. But, if the head guy of a corporation gets arrested, the business doesn't necessarily go under since the business is not technically the property of the boss, even if he is the majority (or perhaps even sole, I'm not sure of the details) stockholder. If the business itself is doing something illegal, it's the opposite. The boss or the stockholders can't necessarily be held accountable. That's the whole purpose of creating a corporation.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  3. No... by BrianGa · · Score: 3, Redundant

    It's not the fact that they are giving away Demos, it's the place that the demos are being placed. A tie-in with a US Government agency is new.

    1. Re:No... by RealTimeFreeAgent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US Post Office is a semi-private agency. It's entirely self funded, but there is congressional oversight.

      The Post Office, due to poor management, is running a _BILLION_ dollar deficit right now. So it's no surprise to me that the USPS is looking for other sources of funding. Basically, it's either this, raise the price of stamps (something they proposed to Congress and they got slapped down for), or a hefty government bailout at taxpayer expense.

      --
      "You get what you pay for after all." --
    2. Re:No... by xonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We should double the cost of bulk-rate advertisements, rather than giving them a cut-rate. Why subsidize mail that no one wants?

    3. Re:No... by version3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My guess is that the opposite is true-- the mass-mailers subsidize us. Not sure what alternatives they would have if the USPS did put the screws to them, but I suppose they don't want to piss them off or make them go broke.

      Although... Joe Schmoe can do a lot of his keeping-in-touch with email, while the massers are pretty stuck. Especially if anti-spam laws take off.

      --
      "Can I say you're my lovepuppy?" Founding member of SODAMNHOTT
    4. Re:No... by superpeach · · Score: 2

      Demos of XP?
      Is this a fully functional version of XP which will upgrade your machine from win9X/2K/whatever to XP and work for 14 days then force you to buy it? or is it just the equivalent of a pretty shockwave animation.

      If it is the former, wouldnt it trick a few people into paying for XP when they dont actually need it? just because the messages say "buy me or lose your work" ?

    5. Re:No... by margaret · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Post Office, due to poor management, is running a _BILLION_ dollar deficit right now

      Then why do they do things like sponsor the Olympics? I wouldn't be annoyed with postage increases if they weren't subsidizing stupid PR stunts like this.

      -margaret

    6. Re:No... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      bulk rate is vastly cheaper than first class. It's possible that the profit margin is higher, but I can't really imagine that it is - there's not that much additional overhead on first class mail thats not there with bulk rate.

  4. Now it is our turn by MentlFlos · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lets all get our burners going and set up our own dump boxes next to the XP ones. Hehe, I would love to see people picking through trying to find their favorite "flavor" of linux.

    With my luck with moderators I will prob end up with -500 notfunnygoburninhell for this, but what the hell, I think it is a great mental picture

  5. So what? by sulli · · Score: 2, Redundant
    And in other news, you can buy an AT&T prepaid phone card at the post office, and you can book a Hertz rent-a-car via Amtrak. We must save the taxpayers - nay, citizens - from this travesty of justice!

    Seriously, who cares? I bet if RHAT paid USPS enough, they'd put their CDs out too.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  6. I pick choice #1 by AdamBa · · Score: 3, Informative
    And am I simply naive, or is there something profoundly disturbing about such shenanigans going on even as District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly allegedly mulls the proper punishment of the Microsoft Corporation, an illegal monopoly, for violating U.S. antitrust law?

    You're simply naive. Last time I checked advertising was legal, even for Microsoft.

    - adam

    1. Re:I pick choice #1 by Fly · · Score: 2
      I personally hope that our post office or other government offices, such as maybe the FBI or IRS, start placing advertisements and "demo" bags of my favorite tea. I don't really see it as the government supporting their brand of tea but simply as a good way for the East India Tea company to advertise it's tea, which as far as I can tell is legal for them to do.

      How can anyone argue with this simple expression of capitalism?

      --
      end of line
  7. Free XP? by zmcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps I'm missunderstanding, but M$ is giving Xp away for free?
    Or are they giving software that runs on XP away for free?

    Which one?

    Heh, I wished they'd mail me a new Debian CD... I don't free like burning one... =)
    Oh well, I can suffer 10 Minutes of torturous burning for a lifetime of joy. =)

    --
    Location: Mt. Xinu
    1. Re:Free XP? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2

      So who's going to be the first one to realize that it's really the full version that's crippled by a couple of registry entries, develops a crack and posts the results to the web?

      This sort of reminds me of Apple's OS X.1 "update" CD that was really the full version.

  8. not only that by Syre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    usps.gov has a marketing deal with Microsoft apparently. Their Web-Based Solutions page, accessable from the main usps.gov page, is "Powered by Microsoft bCentral", and promotes subscriptions to Microsoft services.

    Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

    1. Re:not only that by The+Man · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      This phrase never appears in the constitution. Instead we have "Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion." Which any reasonable person interprets to mean that religions cannot be banned or discriminated against by Congress. It does not mean exactly what Jefferson wrote regarding the separation of church and state, though the ideas are interrelated.

      Now then, "No member of Congress, prospective member of Congress, or agent or representative of same, shall accept consideration from any person or corporation until his term of office shall have expired. Then he may receive consideration only in exchange for goods or services rendered, and only in reasonable compensation at fair-market prices. This prohibition shall begin upon announcing, publicly or otherwise, intention to seek office. Violation shall be punishable by a fine of the greater of one hundred times the value of the consideration accepted or one hundred million dollars. Furthermore, any bill proposed, sponsored, or co-sponsored by said member shall be annulled, and stricken from the United States Code, and that member's vote on all matters which passed before the member shall be null and void." might be a nice start.

    2. Re:not only that by wadetemp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The post office is not really part of the government, but rather a business run to support an important country function. Regardless of how its set up, it's a business nontheless. There's nothing illegal or even really that strange about this. In fact, the government has thier hands in other businesses much more than they do in the Post Office's. (Enron, for example.)

    3. Re:not only that by barzok · · Score: 2

      A separation of church and state is not defined in the Constitution, nor in the ammendments. It's slightly implied, but not really stated clearly. Rather, it was an idea put forth by Thomas Jefferson and people have taken it to heart as he was one of the largest players in the development of the US in those early years.

    4. Re:not only that by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 3, Informative

      > it's not in any official government document whatsoever.

      So I assume that you don't consider rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court to be "official government documents"...

      "The [First] Amendment's purpose... was to create a complete and permanent separation of the spheres of religious activity and civil authority by comprehensively forbidding every form of public aid or support for religion." U.S. Supreme Court, Reynolds v. United States (1879)

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    5. Re:not only that by Peteresch · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      Yes, I know this is an offtopic rabbit trail...

      The other replies are correct in saying that it is nowhere in the constitution. The phrase was coined by the 17th century Baptist leader Roger Williams, and used by Thomas Jefferson on January 1, 1802 (11 years after the First Amendment was ratified).

      The U.S. Supreme Court, the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution's meaning, first utilized the phrase in the 1878 case of Reynolds v. United States, stating that Jefferson's term 'wall of separation between church and state' "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment."

      Over the years the Court has developed and applied what has become known as the "Lemon Test" to decide Establishment Clause cases. The Lemon Test, codified in the Court's 1971 Lemon v. Kurtzman, is a three-pronged inquiry:

      1) Does the challenged legislation or activity have a legitimate secular purpose?;

      2) Does the legislation or activity have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion? and

      3) Does the legislation or activity excessively entangle government with religion?

      Although individual Justices of the Court have, on various occasions, expressed dissatisfaction with this standard of review, the Lemon Test has not yet been replaced.
    6. Re:not only that by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you seen FedEx's prices lately? The reason it gets there in two days with tracking is because it costs about $10 to ship anything UNDER one pound. The reason the USPS exists is to ship mail reasonably quickly (compare the USPS to other national postal services and you'll see what I mean) and for a negligable cost. This isn't a very profitable enterprise, thus why the government runs it.

    7. Re:not only that by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The full clause is:

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

      Reasonable people from Jefferson on have interpreted that to mean two things: first, that the government cannot promote or support any religion, and second, as you say, that the government cannot ban or discriminate any religion. Like much of the Constitution, the First Amendment is a masterpiece of balance. Freedom of and freedom from religion are inseparable.

      Any other interpretation is not only unreasonable, but ahistorical -- remember that the people who wrote the Constitution had rather graphic examples of the horrors of state-supported religion within living memory. These days, at least in the US, we've largely forgotten how dangerous it can be.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    8. Re:not only that by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      Hardly. We need more of this. As long as Microsoft does not get any illegal favors in return, I love the idea of the government making money from corporations instead of taxpayers.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    9. Re:not only that by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      I guess that means that the government should not use the products of ANY corporation then? I guess the military should start building it's own jets, helicopters, bombs, etc. The Post Office should build their own trucks and planes for delivering mail. If your complaint is against the "Powered by Microsoft bCentral" on their website, then I guess maybe they can still use the products of corporations, but they have to peel off all the logos...

    10. Re:not only that by mpe · · Score: 2

      Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

      Depends on the definition of "religion". Considering that many political organisations require at least the same level of faith as any "religion". With the line between "political" and "religious" having been blurred throughout history. Also OS advocates, of all kinds, are described using the same kind of terms as are used to describe religious (or political) positions.

    11. Re:not only that by mpe · · Score: 3, Informative

      The post office is not really part of the government, but rather a business run to support an important country function.

      Governments frequently set up organisations to do things which are eseential for their territory (and it's economy) to operate effectivly. Even if they superficially appear to be businesses the rules they operate under may be different. e.g. not having to maximise profit for shareholders, exemptions from planning laws, etc.

    12. Re:not only that by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      Read my post again:

      If FedEx moved all that volume

      The economy of scale dictates that higher volume = lower cost. If FedEx were allowed to deliver first class mail (which is a much bigger business than express delivery of packages) they'd drive down costs. There's no way to know, but I think FedEx would charge less than USPS for a first class letter.

    13. Re:not only that by Computer! · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, I think the same applies to the U.S. and christianity....

      Well, I think you're an idiot. When did the US and Christianity start getting "entangled"? When IN GOD WE TRUST was on our nation's first currency, (and still appears there)? Was it when "under God" was written into the Pledge? My understanding of the current state of state and religion is that is is becoming less and less "entangled". Seems like we're not doing much better for it, either. If you think religion is the the opium of the people, then I've got a red book I'd love to sell you...

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    14. Re:not only that by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      "In God we Trust" first appeared on U.S. currency in the late nineteenth or early twentieth century, IIRC. The Pledge of Allegiance itself is also about a century old, but the "under God" was added in the 1950's. So yes, both represent relatively new "entanglements." Certainly neither appears in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution ...

      Like I said before, the Founders had graphic examples, in their own recent history, of the horrors of theocracy. Since to modern Americans, religious wars and persecution are things that happen to poor people far away (N. Ireland, Israel, Afghanistan, et bloody cetera) we tend to forget the dangers inherent in mingling church and state. You'd think Sept. 11 would have changed that, at least to a degree, but our own home-grown theocrats (one of whom occupies the White House) co-opted it for their own loony beliefs instead.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    15. Re:not only that by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2

      Economies of scale also suffer from such a thing as the law of diminishing returns. That is, after a certain volume (which FedEx almost certainly already moves) adding any more to it will not significantly lower price. Supply and demand curves for shipping mail are not linear, so eventually the benefits from adding more load simply don't matter. In other words, if FedEx already has no problems filling up an airplane with mail, then it will not cost the end user any less if they have to fill two planes with mail. It just doubles their costs and their profits. The object of a business is to maximize profits, not be nice to the customer (though this is often a means to that end) so FedEx will not lower prices if it won't bring them any more cash.

      The USPS, on the other hand, is a government entity, and exists solely to provide a service. That's why it costs like $0.34 to send a letter. And like I said, look at the postal system of another country (Mexico, or even Canada) and you'll see that mail isn't nearly as reliable as it is here. Yes, it's not the best, but it's $0.34, so don't complain. "Priority Mail" and all that other junk is just the USPS trying to compete with FedEx and UPS using their existing infrastructure to generate some revenue to cover what's lost delivering first-class mail.

    16. Re:not only that by cornflux · · Score: 2

      i am talking about the specific phrase "separation of church and state"

      thank you.

    17. Re:not only that by Computer! · · Score: 2


      Certainly neither appears in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution


      True, but there are lots of other great parts of American government that also do not. If you mean that our nation's affiliation with theism was not part of the Founders' original intent, then point taken.

      James Pollock, Director of the Mint at Philadelphia, November 20, 1861 (note, closer to the Declaration of Independence than to today):


      Dear Sir: No nation can be strong except in the strength of God, or safe except in His defense. The trust of our people in God should be declared on our national coins.
      You will cause a device to be prepared without unnecessary delay with a motto expressing in the fewest and tersest words possible this national recognition.


      President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954:

      In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of reigious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war.


      That loony Eisenhower... what a crackpot. He said that in regards to adding "under God" to the Pledge.

      Anyway, thanks for the history lesson. I didn't know how contemporary those devices were before, and you spurred some research, the fruits of which you see above. Thanks again.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    18. Re:not only that by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      > i am talking about the specific phrase "separation of church and state"

      So by your logic, "freedom of religion" isn't in the Constitution either because that specific phrase with that exact wording doesn't appear.

      "Church" is obviously a lay term for the more precise "spheres of religious activity" and "State" a term for "civil authority".

      > thank you.

      Your welcome.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  9. What's the problem? by kimba · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here in Australia, anyone can stick things in post offices if they pay for it. There are all sorts of brochures and things, plus most of the larger ISPs and phone companies have free samplers and recharge kits there.

    I assume Microsoft's deal isn't an exclusive arrangement?

    1. Re:What's the problem? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Well, it looks like we here in the USA are asleep at the switch. We've actually let another country beat us in finding new venue that can be sold out. This is supposed to be our core competency.

  10. so what? by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate M$ same as everybody else but who cares? They paid some dough and the post office put up a display. Anybody could do it if they had the money.

    The Post Office isn't some holy place, it's barely connected with the government, and hasn't received any tax dollars since Nixon. It's basically a private organization.

    When you see Windows product placement in, say, a courtroom, that's when I'd start to worry....

  11. Re:Though people will probably disagree by PoiBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...And what's most disturbing is that this is the same government which has an anti-trust suit against Microsoft. So much for the left hand knowing what the right hand is doing.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  12. When did Hell start co-locating at the post office by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, okay maybe it's not hell yet, but I'll know I'm in hell when the Johova's Witnesses start going door to door and handing out MS CD-ROM's.

  13. Demo the OS? by filtersweep · · Score: 2

    Did I read that correctly? Who would actually demo an OS?... they are not exactly the easiest thing to uninstall (maybe that is the rub after the "demo period" ends... for only $99 you can restore your PC to working condition).

    It still is a very strange marketing ploy when you consider WHY people upgrade OSes... it is generally not an impulse move. Half the outboard hardware on my DAW is not yet supported by XP.

    --


    Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
    1. Re:Demo the OS? by filtersweep · · Score: 2

      Uh, I'm still using win98... I never did find a reason to upgrade. I will try an OEM of win xp, but I'm not looking forward to it...

      As I recall, win 98se and ME were released with great hype, but the public was ho-hum.

      I seriously think most people upgrade when they buy a new PC... I feel queasy even saying this, but these days, the OSes seem to outlast the hardware. Four years ago you could buy win 98... four years ago maybe a Pentium II 350 was the bleeding edge.

      --


      Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
    2. Re:Demo the OS? by donutello · · Score: 2

      If you upgrade to Windows XP, you can revert to the previous state by selecting Windows XP from Add/Remove Programs in the Control Panel.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  14. First Anthrax now XP by smartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The post office is crawling with viruses these days.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  15. Excellent! what are we doing? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    so why not produce a nice pile of SuSE cd's and have the "dump" say , not a demo the full real operating system... Linux! for FREE!" I'd suggest redhat but that takes 2 cd's now, and slackware is too technical.

    that'll take a helluva lot of steam out of microsoft's campain.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  16. The Real Reason? by e1en0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would the Post Office let a competitor advertise in their building? I'm sure whoever uses XP will use email, which means less snail mail for the Post Office to deliver.

    So ... is the government trying to decrease the public's need for snail mail so they can lay off postal workers, or are they smart enough to know that XP is such a poor, insecure excuse for an OS that they know it'll crash and people will go back to snail mail and increase their business?

  17. Take them all. by Rothfuss · · Score: 5, Funny

    The CDs are free. Take them all.

    Once you have a few hundred of them, you can gather them together with the myriad AOL CDs in your drawer and enjoy a nice day of CD Craft Fun as suggested here, here and here.

    Good luck.

    -Rothfuss

    1. Re:Take them all. by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I could use them as coasters in my living room. That would make a cool conversation piece!

    2. Re:Take them all. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would someone who's felt bold enough to walk off with all the free aol/earthlink/whatever cds in a store please post about the experiance?

    3. Re:Take them all. by afedaken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At the place that I work, we've been using (UGH!) AOL for corporate e-mail, cuz it's fairly easy to use, and they've got POPs everywhere.

      Users manage to munge up thier software on a fairly regular basis. this isn't helped by the bloatware that aol calls a client.

      In addition they're constantly losing the discs that we leave at the sites, so I go and grab a stack of 30 or so it seems about once every other month.

      At the local Wawa (a Philadelphia area chain of conveinence stores) the GM won't let me take them.

      At the CompUSA, they're just glad to be rid of the things.

      When I couldn't find them at the OfficeMax, the clerk went into the back room, and gave me an entire sealed box of the discs. Of course, we do a lot of business with that office max, so I suppose YMMV.

      --
      If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
    4. Re:Take them all. by cosyne · · Score: 2

      Or you can bind them together into a solar collector. Mine is only like 6 CDs across right now but it'll get bigger next time i'm really bored.

      Or, i've heard of a science project using an AOL CD as an AM radio tuner. You apparently cut a strip of the aluminum out (across a diameter) leaving 2 slightly less than half circles (well, rainbows) of metal in the more-or-less intact plastic disk. Then you put it in the sleeve with aluminum foil on one face. The foil is in two triangles, seperated by a strip across the diagonal. Connect to the foil on the sleve, and you have a variable capacitor. When the strips are lined up, the capactiance is low, but if you rotate the cd the metal parts overlap and you get capacitance. Neat.

  18. OK, here's the question. . . by cgleba · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really don't care if MS advertises in post offices. What piques my curiosity, though, is what were / are government agencies' policies on advertising?

    I know that the MA Registry now allows advertising at their sites (somthing for people to look at during the long waits). It wasn't that way too long ago. . .

    I have never seen an advertisment in a post office that did not either promote USPS's services or was somthing about taxes.

    Was this by design, or was it that no one thought of advertising in a post office before :)? Could an advertsising policy cause bias in a government agency like campaign contributions cause in politics?

    It's not radical or life-changing, but it does have a large curiosity factor that I could not find much info on. . .

    1. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... what were / are government agencies' policies on advertising?
      The United States Postal Service is not part of the United States government. It's (in effect) a private company, with a contract from the government to deliver mail.
      --
      Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    2. Re:OK, here's the question. . . by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      $ wget -O - www.usps.gov
      --18:32:27-- http://www.usps.gov/
      => `-'
      Connecting to www.usps.gov:80... connected!
      HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
      Length: unspecified [text/html]

      0K -><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
      <HTML>

      <HEAD>
      <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <TITLE>USPS - The United States Postal Service (U.S. Postal Service)</TITLE>

  19. Who cares? by caspper69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw this display, and now after reading this post I must ask, "What does it matter?" It's not as if MS is advertising in your local city hall or courthouse. It's the post office... A branch of the government that isn't responsible for anything remotely important (yes, I realize mail delivery is important, but it's not going to make or break my life/freedom either way).

    Not only that, but it's a branch of the government that's entirely self-sufficient. Not one red cent comes from taxpayers. So again I ask, what does it matter?

  20. Creative Crime. by BreakWindows · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, the "devious" flag just raised on this one. Maybe I can grab all the CD's, bring them home and burn new ones, chock full'of nice little additions...viruses, bugs, flaws; then put them back, shrinkwrapped and ready to go. "Hello, Microsoft? I just installed this XP promo and every time I boot up it invokes the name of Satan". Or, "sweet jesus, what's with all the penguins on my screen!?". Hey, maybe something as simple as a new office assistant that offers advice every 15 seconds.

    And for the smartasses...yes, new bugs over the ones already on there. I guess this would work with those AOL promo's too...but since no one would ever install those (as they already have 500) it wouldn't be as fulfilling.

    1. Re:Creative Crime. by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Troll
      Looks like you're trying to be funny on Slashdot! Office assistant can help you be a better karma whore! What would you like to do?
      • Worship Linux
      • Bash Microsoft some more
      • Try to get a first post
      • Claim *BSD is dying
      • Close this window
    2. Re:Creative Crime. by epsalon · · Score: 2

      bring them home and burn new ones, chock full'of nice little additions...viruses, bugs, flaws

      You mean burn an original WindowsXP CD? Got it all...

  21. why is this noteworthy? by dimitri_k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Advertising with the post office isn't new. Ever change your address? This is hardly noteworthy.

    The postal worker in the article says that FedEx and UPS are doing the same thing. Why should the USPS not take a check to provide ad space?

    It'll help keep stamps cheap.

    --
    sig is
  22. Re:a demo? by CDWert · · Score: 2

    Uhhh, thats the point MS demo's pretty much hook you into it. One day you cant log on to your W2K box, or start getting DB connection errors from SQL, because you installed a demo and forgot, (I did this in a dev enviroment) solution, put the purchased one on, or buy a serial in the case of XP ,or in the case of SQL server roll your clock back, actually early W2K server demo's too. I doubt XP is as stupid

    They get it on and you have little choice as I belive you cannot easily unistall XP (may be wrong with all the SxS dll mapping it would be tough I think) Soooooooooo, with the new MS authenitication you cant just pick up a number off a SeRiALZ site, but Mr VISA and 199 will get you the pro version and they'll activate it over the phone :)

    Hell if I was an evil megolitic corporation and a billionaire goober that ran it and had more money than god, I'd do it too , cant blame em for trying :)

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  23. Its called advertising. by Restil · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    The USPS is a business like any other. Sure, they have some governmental influence, both ways, but if someone wants to pay them to put up posters.... why not?

    And besides.. asking clerks about it won't get you very far. I'm surprised that your post office wasn't so busy that the clerk actually had enough time to ask you if there was anything else you needed.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  24. They didn't need to do that by unformed · · Score: 2

    They got those customers back as soon as the people realized getting "files for advice" in the mail is much less worse than getting powder.

  25. Re:So what? by RetroGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    The best one was a diskette (in the early days) that was distributed with a magnet order.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  26. Re:so what? by lost+in+place · · Score: 3, Funny

    Soon to come for US Postal Service:

    - Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer special edition collectable stamps. Special $1.50 versions: their eyes follow you around the room.

    - Windows 3.1 commemorative phone cards ("Relive the special magic of that release with every call you make!")

    - Collector's Edition Outlook Virus Stamps. 24 special full-color postage stamps illustrating your favorite Outlook-spread viruses. Collect 'em all!

    - Special "Blue Screen of Death" postcards. Nothing but white hex numbers on a field of blue, and you can't write on them. $5.00 for a set of 20.

  27. Windows Stamps? by Rothfuss · · Score: 5, Funny


    I'm looking forward to the "Great Operating Systems of the 20th Century" stamp series sponsored by Microsoft.

    There will be stamps celebrating such great operating systems as

    Windows 3
    Windows 3.1
    Windows 3.11
    Windows NT 3.5
    Windows NT 3.51
    Windows NT 4.0
    Windows 95
    Windows 98
    and
    Windows 2000

    Then of course there will be a variety of service packs for the 1 cent stamps.

    -Rothfuss

    1. Re:Windows Stamps? by etceteral · · Score: 3, Funny


      Windows 3
      Windows 3.1
      Windows 3.11
      Windows NT 3.5
      Windows NT 3.51
      Windows NT 4.0
      Windows 95
      Windows 98
      and
      Windows 2000


      Aieee.... how could you forget about the flagship stamp: Bob?

      I can think of no better stamp to use on any "cancellation of service" letter to MS than Bill Gates' alter ego =)

      --

      ------------
      "...and Maddest of all, to see Life as it Is, and not as it Should Be."

    2. Re:Windows Stamps? by Locutus · · Score: 2

      You forgot that wonderful Windows NT 3.1 it's the one that made me start using OS/2. Thank gawd Linux grew up as IBM is putting the nails in OS/2.

      To bad only the BeOS came close to working as well as OS/2 but today, Linux is still better than Windows ANYTHING. That's not saying much but Linux does rock. IMHO.

      Does anybody else laugh at every "flag" Microsoft thows up to show the press it's listening? Security is the latest flag but that's really funny since it'll require a rewrite if every application they sell since there is no difference between Windows the OS and Microsoft Applications.

      Oh, where is Windows Millenium? And don't forget DOS 4.x, that was a "great" OS just as all the other Windows OS's. ;/

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  28. I'm firing up the burner by npietraniec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just the disks I have on hand... I'll make 10 copies of Red Hat, 10 copies of Mandrake, 10 copies of Suse, trek on down to the post office tomorrow and stuff them in the Microsoft ad. I encourage everyone to do the same :)

    Maybe scribble a sign overhead and tape it to the MS ad. "...Or use Linux!"

    1. Re:I'm firing up the burner by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      Freelinuxcd.org could put your burned copies to much better use.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:I'm firing up the burner by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      The site was down for a long while due to a hosting problem. He has recently brought it back up and is going to start releasing disks again very soon.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  29. Question for RedHAT guys... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Granted I have been a redhat critic of late but I do have a serious question. what tools or help does redhat give to linux advocates to "get the word out". can I request 100 bulk CD's to give out? how about tri-fold pamphlets? MS is marketing like mad and the largest Linux purveyor sits quietly and only advertises in technical journals or the linux mag's.

    what if my LUG wants to stand on corners and give out linux cd's? I agree that RH7.2 is the easiest that even a non-computer user can install and use it.

    so what can I do to get it out there? and if redhat wont help what other distros will help by supplying bulk cd's? anyone?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      The whole Linux thing was never supposed to be about following corporate leadership, but instead about grass root efforts. So don't pull this "why doesn't Redhat..." stuff. Get off your butt and burn some CDs of Debian, Redhat, or whatever good Linux distro you can get your hands on... start giving that out.

      Something doesn't come from nothing. Redhat can't break that rule of thumb, and neither can you. If you have to dip into your pocket, then so be it.

      Linux is all about everyone chipping in. Its not about everyone pissing and moaning about what Redhat does and does not do. Though with the recent rumors of the AOL purchasing of Redhat and other things... it seems that people have forgot what Linux is all about.

    2. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 2
      the biggest question is why oh why doesnt the biggest linux company have a program in place to help lug's get the word out for basically free.

      Back in December of 1999, the Washtenaw LUG held a "counter-rally" in the U of M Student Union, in the same room where MS was hyping Windows2K and pushing Office. The organizers contacted Redhat, and they sent 500 CDs of Redhat 6.2 for us to give out. Don't know how much it helped in the long run, but Redhat was responsive to this. (So were Caldera, Slackware, Turbo, and SuSE.).

      The key is volume and visibility. Redhat is a business; they're here to make a profit. Sure, they want to give back to the community, but for some reason a 2-day event focused on software makes better sense for a mass CD distribution than sending out 3 or 4 guys to hand out CDs on street corners.

      It's all about organization. Contact your local LUG and set up an installfest and/or large public meeting for those interested in Linux. Once you've got the details worked out, contact Redhat a week or two in advance. Odds are they'd be glad to help if you can show evidence that enough people will be on hand.

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    3. Re:Question for RedHAT guys... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      "Anyway, I don't use linux right now - OS X at home and the W2k bug at work - so let that affect your judgement of my opinion however you feel is appropriate"

      OS X is a nice OS. It's much too slow on the hardware I have (Old-World G3 tower...) so I run only Linux and MacOS 9 on it. Win2k's probably a "no options" situation and I can understand- besides, while it's more of a resource pig than NT was, it's still better than it (Relative term, I'll admit, but it IS better).

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  30. New Merger, USPS bought out by MS by Mac+Nazgul · · Score: 5, Funny

    PR release:

    Microsoft announced today the acquisition of the United Postal Service. "It's a great innovation, that we know our customers will enjoy. Instead of being hassled by paper communication, our MSN and Hotmail service will provide all means of communication for the people of the US in a safe and secure way." said Microsoft's co-founder Bill Gates.
    While many questions have risen regarding the ethical and legal considerations, Microsoft was confident of the acceptance of their new program. With a surprise backer in the federal government, Microsofts program received considerable support from a Mr. DCS1000. Security considerations also came into play with the recent anthrax scares.
    The program launches tomorrow, with the initial transfer of all US citizens to the new MS PassportPlus for national identification (Win95/NT/98/2000/XP compatible). A new email activation program will also initiate, offering enhanced security against terrorist hackers sendign unauthorized digital signals.

  31. Re:Though people will probably disagree by yy1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the Site

    United States Postal Service
    The Post Office Department was transformed into the United States Postal Service, an independent establishment of the executive branch of the Government of the United States. The mission of the Postal Service remained the same, as stated in Title 39 of the U.S. Code: "The Postal Service shall have as its basic function the obligation to provide postal services to bind the Nation together through the personal, educational, literary, and business correspondence of the people. It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities."

    --
    Because, sometimes they just have to touch the stove.
    -YY1
  32. And the Post Office Sells Warner Bros. Stamps. by Quarters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daffy Duck, Bugs Bunny, Wile E. Coyote. They're all there. They've done that for years.

    I've seen American Express application forms at the Post Office for as long as I can remember.

    I really don't see much wrong with this.

  33. Re:Does anyone have a use for... by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2

    You never saw that Target commercial where they had a room with the walls and ceiling painted red and completely covered with CDs?

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  34. Re:Is this the right site? by baronben · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can that happen?
    I know this sounds a bit naïve, but there are some places were I feel
    I shouldn't have to see ads. My taxes (as much of a pittance that they are)
    pay for post offices among other things. Why should the post office then need
    get funding from elsewhere? I would be willing to pay 35 cents for a stamp if
    it meant not having to see ads in the post office, just as I would pay more
    taxes to make sure there aren't
    any ads in schools

  35. Regardless by iGawyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Regardless of your opinions of Microsoft, it's advertising. AOL has done the same for years, leaving their CDs or floppy disks everywhere imaginable.

    So MS puts posters in CDs into a USPS office? Big deal. It's not like you can argue that the USPS is a government office and the government is promoting it, the USPS is a government-contracted company, just look it up in your history book.

    If the USPS agrees to hang the signs, then they're there. Personally, either someone will or won't upgrade, and a nifty poster in a post office won't influence too many people, and certainly not the type who would use Linux.

    Call me a troll for not flaming Microsoft, but it's just marketing, not monopolistic business tactics. And hell, maybe the cost of postage will go down with the money that MS gives the USPS for putting the posters.

    Gawyn

    1. Re:Regardless by elmegil · · Score: 5, Insightful
      it's just marketing, not monopolistic business tactics.

      And exactly where did the article say it was monopolistic business practices?

      Seems to me everyone is bitching because of the blatant conflict of interest on the part of the government. "One hand is suing you, the other hand is selling you advertising space that isn't apparently being sold to any other advertiser."

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Regardless by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      Blatant conflict of interest? The USPS is not a fucking government agency. They are merely another government contractor needing to make some dough. USPS's management has nothing to do with a DOJ lawsuit against anybody. If there were giant MSN posters hanging off the sides of the White House it would be a blatant conflict of interest but not some poster in a USPS branch office. They are a private fucking company and can do what they want to make cash. I'd rather yet another poster at the post office no one pays attention to than 5$ stamps.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    3. Re:Regardless by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      Because a postal inspector can arrest your ass doesn't make them a government agency. They are a private business which happens to have an exclusive government contract to deliver mail within the US. It doesn't make any difference what laws are in place to keep people from fucking with the mail they are a private company and get cash by charging you money to deliver mail. You can get fined and jailed for interfering with a federally funded building project conducted by a federally contracted company but it doesn't make said construction company a government agency.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  36. Re:Coming and Going by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You pay for a stamp to send mail"

    And the post office loses money on it.

    "You pay for a box to receive mail"

    Or receive all your mail at a friends house.

    "You subsidize spammy junk mail catalogs because companies get favorable bulk mail rates"

    Companies get favorable bulk rates because bulk prebarcoded mail is easier to process. I don't think you "subsidize" it.

    "And now you have to veiw adds while you stand in line or check your box"

    OK, I hate ads too. But you're already bitching about your stamp costs. How do you want them to make enough money to continue their operations? I barely ever go into a post office--if it bothers you that much, you could probably avoid it too.

  37. It's really a "Wanted" poster by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    Usually when you see posters on post offices, they feature people who steal valuable resources from citizens or cause them irreperable harm. Usually these people are regarded as being extremely dangerous and should be avoided at all costs

    I'd say that adequately pegs XP.

    1. Re:It's really a "Wanted" poster by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      No joke:

      I had a buddy print off 500 of those Bill Gates' arrest pictures.

      We will be distributing them around town.

      The best part, 150 are these:

      http://www.allyourbase.net/pictures/index.php/fa vs /large/gates.jpg

      I suggest people do the same.

  38. Conspiracy or advertising budget? by kenneth_martens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do you suppose the post office is advertising for Microsoft? Is it a conspiracy designed to kill Linux?

    No, the truth is, Microsoft can advertise Windows XP because they have a large advertising budget. Linux doesn't get advertised nearly as much because Red Hat, Debian, Suse, Slackware, etc. are all operating on a very thin profit margin and can't afford the kind of advertising that Microsoft can.

    Now, the question as to whether the US Postal System should endorse or provide a venue for the promotion of Windows XP is another issue altogether. But it is important to realize that without Microsoft's advertising budget, this wouldn't ever have happened.

  39. Re:so what? by rebug · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This trial is brought to you by windows xp(tm)...eXPerience the difference!"

    --

    there's more than one way to do me.
  40. Cant Get It Off by didyaseethat · · Score: 2, Informative

    These XP demo's will "upgrade" your current 9x/2k install. This works great untill your free demo is up, and then you get the forced online authentication, exactly the same as if you didn't register a purchased version. Of course, since you cannot do anything with your computer aside from get the must register message you are officially SOL. Format and re-install, without any chance to back up your stuff. At least that is the story with my roomates PC.

    1. Re:Cant Get It Off by donutello · · Score: 2

      Your roommate is an idiot, then. He can simply select Windows XP from Add/Remove Programs in the Control Panel and go back to whatever was on his computer before.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  41. Re:Though people will probably disagree by nomadic · · Score: 2

    Yep, now they'll be able to do the "Miracle on 34th Street" defense in court.

    (after having hundreds of demo CDs poured onto Judge Kotar-Kelly's desk)
    "As you can see, your honor, the US Postal Service, a gen-yoo-wine branch of the US Government, recognizes Microsoft's right to "innovate".
    Case dismissed!

  42. Re:So what? by Hercynium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are 100% correct. My local post office has advertisements posted not just on a bulletin board, but in the office itself. And these aren't all small local companies. I've seen displays for John Hancock Insurance, Bank of Boston (when it used to be BOB), and even _gasp_ Sun Microsystems. (That one was a hiring blitz, they have a big facility nearby.) On top of that the Post office in Lowell sells phone cards from Sprint (or maybe they're AT&T), and even stationary, pens, pencils, binders, etc. The USPS doesen't generate revenue from stamps alone.

    What annoys me about this story is that someone considers this news... Hey timothy, post something I don't know about. (If this were about any of the companies I just mentioned, do you think it would be considered important?)

    --
    I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
  43. Re:so what? by s390 · · Score: 2

    Isn't there something in the Constitution about Separation of Church and State?

  44. The post office doesn't take tax dollars. by TheMCP · · Score: 2

    The post office does not run on tax dollars, it runs on what you pay for postage and services. It also probably makes a profit on Microsoft's advertising.

    On the other hand my personal concern is, they're still the local office of the federal governement, technically, so how come they have ads up for a company and product that the federal government just successfully sued for being in violation of federal law?

  45. Well, are you all just going to sit there by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    like a bunch of startled dugongs, or are you going to burn a batch of Linux install CDs and swap them with the XP demo disks? Use one of those "we make it look as much like Windows as possible" distributions, and you might just get away with it, too.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  46. Re:Though people will probably disagree by nomadic · · Score: 2

    And yes, I realize I royally messed up the Judge's name.

  47. Re:so what? by _Mustang · · Score: 2

    Well for a second there I thought you wrote

    Windows 3.1 commemorative phone cards ("Relieve the special magic with every call you make!")

    and realized it would make sense over the stalls in the washrooms..but that I wouldn't want to be around when some other guy was "relieving" his *magic* in a public restroom..

  48. The USPS needs money too! by Quixote · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The USPS does not get any money from the taxpayers. They have to earn everything themselves. Since 9/11, the USPS has lost Billions of dollars in lost revenue, anthrax hassles, etc. They have to make up the money somewhere! If Micro$oft came to them and offered them a large amount of money to put up such display cases, I'm all for it!
    BTW: the USPS does a tremendous job for the amount they charge for the postage. Have you looked at first-class postage rates in Europe?

    1. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      Actually, the USPS uses what is called a use-based tax. You use the service, then you pay. In my opinion, use-based taxes lead to far more efficient government programs.

    2. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Quixote · · Score: 2

      Actually, the USPS uses what is called a use-based tax. You use the service, then you pay. In my opinion, use-based taxes lead to far more efficient government programs.

      By your definition, your local grocery store also uses a "use-based tax".

    3. Re:The USPS needs money too! by uradu · · Score: 2

      > BTW: the USPS does a tremendous job for the amount they charge for the postage.

      Yeah, well, you get about what you pay for. Reliable mail service is largely an oxymoron in the US. I guess statistics alone might still weigh in its favor, but if I have anything that needs to get anywhere with any level of urgency and/or reliability, I will use FedEx over the USPS anyday. I don't know if that's still true nowadays, but when I used to use Deutsche Post in the '80s, their level of expediency and reliability was much more comparable to FedEx than the USPS. I guess service has its price.

      -

    4. Re:The USPS needs money too! by Quixote · · Score: 2

      but if I have anything that needs to get anywhere with any level of urgency and/or reliability, I will use FedEx over the USPS anyday.

      When FedEx starts delivering for $0.34, let me know and I'll also gladly switch.
      BTW: compare the delivery area of US -vs- Deutschland. Alaska itself is bigger than that.

    5. Re:The USPS needs money too! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      It largely depends on where you are sending to/from -- apparently, a few of the local post offices have some problems. However, with a few (localized) exceptions, the USPS does an amazing job. Mail generally takes 3-4 days to cross the country, and next-day delivery is normal within the same state. Even if they were to double their prices, it would be well worth it.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    6. Re:The USPS needs money too! by uradu · · Score: 2

      > When FedEx starts delivering for $0.34, let me know and I'll also gladly switch.

      Well, maybe there's such as thing as too cheap.

      > BTW: compare the delivery area of US -vs- Deutschland. Alaska itself is bigger than that.

      That is true, but doesn't explain the stack of munged letters I've received over the last decade. Tearing up a letter in a machine and then sending it to you with a simple "sorry" doesn't exactly qualify as "amazing" service. Passable, but not amazing.

      -

    7. Re:The USPS needs money too! by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Depends on the program. Used based taxes are also regressive. As long as the service is something that is not absolutely necessary. Imagine if everyone had to explicitly pay for the roadwork in front of their house? Want to use your road? It's a fixed fee of $500 a year. Well fine if your making 30 grand or more. Pretty shitty if your making 5 grand a year...

      As usual, things are about 10x as complicated as anyone on /. ever considers.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  49. Re:So what? by DarkZero · · Score: 2

    Errr, I think you missed the point. The point was that a convincted monopolist that has been making the government jump through tons of legal hoops for several years is now being advertised by a different branch of that government.

    Not really interesting, and it doesn't say very much, but it IS sort of funny.

  50. Re:so what? by s390 · · Score: 2

    It's a joke, son. Operating Systems are viewed as religions in OS advocacy flame wars. Get it now?

  51. Re:so what? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Visions of an XP urinal puck danced through my head.... shudder...

  52. Re:Does anyone have a use for... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

    Speaking of this, back when AOL gave out their software on 1.44MB floppy disks, they had a form online where you could request a free kit.

    I set up a script to request several hundred kits, and they actually sent them to me. A month or two later they put a little notice about "limit 5 kits per month".

    It was too bad, I really liked getting free High Density floppies.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  53. Re:so what? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    Isn't there something in the Constitution about Separation of Church and State?

    No. This is a common myth held even by fairly well educated people. The "Seperation of Church and State" is simply a oft repeated concept that is currently being followed. A couple of centuries ago, it was "Manifest Destiny", and the US thought they had the moral imperitive to take all land west to the Pacific.

    The closest thing that applies is the constitutional prohibition against establishing an official religion at the federal level, something that does not imply any form of seperation. Thus the "In God we Trust" on our bills, and a National Cathedral, chaplains in the US Armed services, etc. Religion is part of many people's lives, and a tolerance for religion is as important as a tolerance for those who do not choose religion.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  54. What I want to know by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Does an XP CD glow after being irradiated? Or does it just melt?

    I'm melting! Melting!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  55. Re:Coming and Going by elmegil · · Score: 2
    But you're already bitching about your stamp costs.

    Where exactly did the poster you're replying to bitch about stamp costs?

    As far as it goes, if I could get reliably delivered mail that wasn't shredded half the time, I'd be glad to pay additional postage. But since the USPS is effectively another government granted monopoly (or is it a goverment agency? Hm, wish they could make up their minds), there's no real competition for letter carrying to force them to be worth a damn.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  56. Hey, just imagine... by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

    What if, during the period that the US and several states were suing the Tobacco companies, the big 5 had setup free giveaway kiosks inviting people to "Visit Flavor Country"?

    - JoeShmoe

    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  57. Re:In Other News... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wheter it be political (space exploration, women's causes, etc...), celebrational (Madonna stamps come to mind), or any number of other messages.... Stamps have always been an advertisement medium, whether you recognize it or not. Maybe that's the best part - you don't!

    That's not quite true. Stamps have certainly not been used as a commercial advertisement medium (i.e. to sell a product, a real product). If there have been cases -- of which I've never heard -- then they are few and far between. You confuse commercial advertisement with awareness/recongition (women's causes, Madonna), national/patriotic endeavours (space exploration). The other messages fall in those categories, as well as artistic, historical, geographical, animal and fauna, symbols, and so on - but none of these have anything to do with a commercial product or service.

    The Postal Service has never been "just" a business - otherwise it would have sunk long ago - it is a semi-private government service (it's the same here in Canada as in the U.S.). That's quite different, and if you don't understand this then you don't really understand what business is (not to mention the nature of capitalism).

    As far the Microsoft ads goes, I don't know how it is in the states, but in Canada we don't have ads from major corporations, except in the rare cases when there are joint projects with the Postal Service. But plain ads, and from as big a company as Microsoft? No. I have to say, ads in a government service for a company (and not just any company, THE company) which the government is suing in Federal court? That does sound quite absurd, even for the U.S., famous for not doing things the same way as anyone else... :-)

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
  58. The USPS *does* represent the government by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Post Office isn't some holy place, it's barely connected with the government

    The post office is the sole official physical presence of the U.S. federal government countrywide.

    Where do you go to "register" for the Selective Service (the draft)? The post office.

    Where do you go to get federal tax forms? The post office is required to supply them.

    Sure, some municipalities may have an FBI or ATF branch office, or even a Secret Service office, but the USPS is the main federal presence in EVERY town. It is the face of the US Government for most.

    1. Re:The USPS *does* represent the government by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 2

      So, are you pointing this out to make the argument that they shouldn't sell advertising space? I can see the merit in that, but it really has nothing to do with Microsoft. Microsoft is just another advertiser in this case, it could have been anyone's display there. It could have been Redhat. Or the company you work for. And still could be.

      So why isn't the story titled just, "Promotions turn up in USPS Offices?" I suspect that that's not really news, first of all, since the USPS is run as a business and can largely do what they want to make up their costs. But when a particular company a large portion of slashdot readers dislike buys that ad space, well, NOW there's something to get pissed off about! By placing Microsoft in the subject, instead of just mentioning who the promotions belong to in passing (if even that) it's implying that Microsoft has done something evil again. There's an interesting debate here about whether it's appropriate for a quasi-governmental business that receives no tax dollars to sell advertising, but it's been derailed by turning this into yet another Microsoft story.

      Any annoyance you may observe in the above is directed more at the story than the post I'm responding to, sorry ChrisCampbell47.

  59. Re:So what? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > Too bad it's not a free full working copy of XP. It's only a demo CD...

    ...Yeah, but with mandatory Windows Product Activation, what's the difference ;-)

  60. Geez, what's the big deal? by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    I go to my bank and their's plenty of free AOL CD's. I don't see anyone complaining about that. At the post office they have a FREE promotional offer for yet another ISP. But hey, now that MS is doing it, it must be wrong, even illegal.

  61. Oh oh this would not work by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer special edition collectable stamps

    And if they did issue such a stamp some people would have a problem getting them to stick as they would spit on the wrong side.

  62. Separation of church and state in First Amendment by yerricde · · Score: 2

    [separation of church and state is]

    From the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  63. The reverse would also be true by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2

    Maybe we need to add "separation of corporation and state" to our "separation of church and state" in the constitution?

    That would also prevent governments from breaking up monolopies, wouldn't it?

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  64. Re:This is perfect. by mlk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People do not complain about AOL free CD's because AOL not a monopoly.
    If I go into (insert any major shop) I can pick up a different free 'get online CD' (In the UK it's normally one of the following three, AOL, Yahoo or BT), then you have all the smaller ISP's, add on to that the commercial ISP's. Choose, you have it with ISP's, can you really say the same about the desktop?

    As to 'free for home use', hell it virtual is, I know no one who paid for Windows, it comes preinstall on computers. As with Office, what you are suggesting is free upgrades... God bless capitalism...

    mlk

    But this really is not news... OMG MS are advertising in post offices!? What next, will they have adverts on TV? How will I escape! :)

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  65. Re:Shipping a package? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

    I don't consider that post mail, I consider that 'shipping'.

  66. Re:so what? by FattMattP · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Post Office isn't some holy place, it's barely connected with the government, and hasn't received any tax dollars since Nixon. It's basically a private organization.
    Whether it has received any tax dollars or not is irrelevant. It's part of the government. Did you notice their domain was usps.gov? Did you know that it is illegal to attempt to compete against the USPS with mail delivery under the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 39, Chapter 1, Sec. 310.2, paragraph (a)? Those regulations are only suspended for mail that is considered "urgent" and "critial" but only if it's being delivered more than 50 miles away from where it's sent. In those cases, companies can compete but they are required by law to charge more than the USPS would, even if the USPS can do it cheaper. Read about it in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 39, Chapter 1, Sec. 320.6, paragraph (c). Did you know that the Postal Service is exempt from property taxes? They are exempt from parking tickets as well. They even have their own law enforcement branch with badges and guns.

    Sounds like government to me, warts and all.

    --
    Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
  67. Re:So what? by jazman_777 · · Score: 2
    The so what is that it's happening at the U.S.P.S., not Best Buy or some other store that M.S. has ties to, but a psuedo U.S. government agency...


    Birds of a feather flock together. Microsoft the Monopolist along with USPS the Monopolist.

    Funny thing is, the US DOJ went after Microsoft, trying to break its monopoly grip. So why doesn't the DOJ go after the USPS for its monopoly grip on first class mail service? Because the USPS is a government-sanctioned and -backed and -enforced monopoly, which makes the whole thing against Microsoft fairly ironic.

    Question: is it _being_ a monopoly that is bad for consumers? If so, go after the USPS, too.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. In a way, yes - by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    If they are a private company, why are they subject to so much regulation? Any innovation, change of business practice, rate increase, etc.
    The USPS is a GSE - Government Sponsored Entity - like Freddie MAC, Fannie Mae, etc.
    Yet still, legally, they are owned by the members of the USPS Union. (I don't think that just anyone else can buy stock in them...)
    As for them being able to do what they like - I truly doubt it. Did you ever notice that it costs exactly the same price to send a letter across the street as it does to send a letter to someone in a remote rural location? If they could 'do what they want', I'm sure they would start charging more for the inconvenient deliveries...
    They are not open to free-market competition, either - the have been granted a monopoly on first class mail. That's why FedEx can't suddenly start offering first-class mail - the USPS has been granted a monopoly on that. With that monopoly comes a huge amount of government regulation -
    In fact, the National Association of Letter Carriers has regulations that specifically prohibit advertising in Post Office Lobbies - Take a look at section 338.413 of the following: http://www.nalc.org/depart/cau/pdf/manuals/asm/asm c3.pdf

    I'm only writing this because there's a lot of confusion on the subject - If your post was a troll, it was pathetic. Put a little more effort into it next time.

    Cheers,
    Jim in tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  70. Re:Coming and Going by eyeball · · Score: 2

    Companies get favorable bulk rates because bulk prebarcoded mail is easier to process. I don't think you "subsidize" it.
    *nod* Mass mailings actually subsidize residential mail. If it weren't for the 'big bad corporations' that people around here bitch about, postage would be somewhere around a dollar per letter. It's a similar situation to the airlines, where they make most of their profit off of business travelers, and loose money on standard consumers.

    Personally I find their lack of design sense more annoying than a few advertisments.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  71. Re:So what? by Gorobei · · Score: 2

    Birds of a feather flock together. Microsoft the Monopolist along with USPS the Monopolist.


    Funny thing is, the US DOJ went after Microsoft, trying to break its monopoly grip. So why doesn't the DOJ go after the USPS for its monopoly grip on first class mail service? Because the USPS is a government-sanctioned and -backed and -enforced monopoly, which makes the whole thing against Microsoft fairly ironic.


    No! The DOJ went after Microsoft for unfair use of its monopoly. It's fine to be a monopoly, but when you are, you must play be much stricter rules. For example, the USPS must deliver to everyone, and therefore can't charge an extra $50 to people living in out of the way areas. They also can't decide to charge more to businesses that also use FedEx at times.


    As a government sanctioned monopoly, USPS is restricted more: they can't even raise prices without approval.


    If Microsoft had carefully documented APIs, provided all firms with equal access to new product information, and not entered into special pricing deals (Win for $45 if you don't allow dual-OSes,) they probably would never have been attacked by the DOJ.

  72. Good start - one change by Chazmati · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's pretty good! I'd take out the 'hard-coded' reference to an arbitrary US Dollar amount, though. $100 million might sound about right for a really punishing fine today, but maybe $100 sounded reasonable for a fine back in the 19th century. These documents have staying power.

  73. Re:This is perfect. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..unless, of course, you play games, develop software for windows, do video editing, have a consumer-grade webcam, scanner, etc., or are learning to use a computer and will have to know the OS for work. In which case, carry on..

    Btw, nowadays Windows surpasses Linux in the desktop scene for three technical reasons:

    1) video drivers with a standardized interface to the kernel. The X/Gtk/KDE thing is outdated; we need a more Windowsish approach where we drop files in, set up a few symlinks and it's using those drivers instead. We should not be forced to recompile our kernel or replace X!

    2) a graphics SDK that's modern (OpenGL 2.0 and it's standardized pixel and vertex shader calls won't be out for another two or three quarters at least, according to the last meeting of the ARB, which means that without a doubt, DirectX will be the new standard for game development. This is fact. Live with it.)

    3) a monolithic kernel.

    Number 3's what's holding us back. I predict that once (if) the GNU hurd catches on, we'll start to see some open source developers moving in this direction. Maybe even the X people'll head that way. But until then.. Linux and BSD may be free, but they ain't the best. Sorry.

  74. "Postal Ad Network" by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    The U.S. Postal Service now sells advertising space. They call it the "Postal Ad Network". The USPS writes:
    • Success Sells.

      For over 200 years, the United States Postal Service is the brand that has been built on trust and service.

      Now we're selling our unique space. Think of us as your Multi-channel Communications Service. Marketers can get the visibility and reach through the Postal Ad Network.

      Place your big message on our trucks, collection boxes and even in our postal facilities. Or small space ads on our stamp packages and banner ads on our website.

    So it may get worse; there may be Microsoft ads on USPS trucks next.

    There's opposition to the USPS selling out like this.

  75. seems a bit ironic by LesF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free promotions, how strange... and kinda desparate sounding...

    Down here in NZ I received a postcard 'invitation' to the visual studio .net product release, which I can be privileged to attend at the cost of $149 (plus 12.5% GST).

    Now I may have a distorted view of the universe, from working on a Microsoft development platform for too long, but shouldn't MS be offering incentives for developers to take up their new dev tools ? Maybe a free copy of VS.NET here & there ? So we can develop applications that require our clients to purchase MS licenses ?

    No, they can give away massive $$$ to promote the OS of the future, but developers should PAY THEM to sit in a big room and hear about new products that we could buy off them. Altho I was not rushing to take up .NET to start with, this slipped the gear lever into reverse for me.

    oh, and my home desktop is KDE, so even a free copy of XP ain't getting near my hardware :)

    LesF

  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. Re:So you're upset about...? by Sethb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree, the USPS was selling Looney Tunes stamps a couple of years ago, and you can bet that AOL Time-Warner was pulling in some cash from that. There were also tie-ins for The Grinch movie all over our local Post Office, so I don't really see the significance of Microsoft not-so-boldly going where several corporations have gone before...

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  78. Re:So what? by Sethb · · Score: 2

    No, you'd have to have a hole in your head to buy the retail version with Product Activation, when you can use the corporate version that lacks it, just get your employer to buy you a license. :)

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  79. What are you smoking? by Erris · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The post office is not really part of the government but rather a business run to support an important country function.

    What part of "United States Post Office" don't you understand? That the civil servants are employed by the Federal Government?

    There are many makers of software in this great country and I'm sure none of them apprecite their tax dollars being used to support Microsoft. Don't you remember half of them testifying against M$ over the last few years? Well, gee there it is being promoted in a maner that some people will take as offial US sponsorship. It stinks. Were any of them offered the same oppertunity? Would it even be possible to fit all the material there? 30 Linux distros, 45 BSDs, AOL, Sun, HP, Compaq. There would not be room to stand.

    Let's look at another thing "powering" the US post office by way of compairison. Jeeps. You see them all over, as they won bids on an open market. The Post Office Jeeps were stripped of all insignia and were only recognizable by their form. No cardboard cut outs recomending the purchase of Jeeps ever kept the sun from shining through a USPO window. No "test drives" were ever offered. Instead, Jeep was happy to be making the sale and the use was recomendation enough. The USPO had no intentions of recomending one automobile maker over another.

    Go to Netcraft, you will see that most US government sites do NOT run M$ trash.

    So my wife asks me, "why would they bother to promote M$, a company that needs no promotion." Might the settlement be nationalization? Oh shit.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:What are you smoking? by XorNand · · Score: 3, Informative


      Technically, the USPS is a corporation wholly owned by the US government, but not actually part of it.
      It's been this way since July 1, 1971 since the passage of the Postal Reorganization Act. Prior to then, the Postmaster General was a Presidential Cabinet level position (might come in handy if you ever make it onto the Millionaire show.)

      Some other changes:
      - Operational authority vested in a Board of Governors and Postal Service executive management, rather than in Congress.

      -Authority to issue public bonds to finance postal buildings and mechanization.

      -Direct collective bargaining between representatives of management and the unions.

      -A new rate-setting procedure, built around an independent Postal Rate Commission.

      (If you're really interested, check out a bit of history on the USPS.)

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    2. Re:What are you smoking? by mlong · · Score: 2, Informative
      What part of "United States Post Office" don't you understand? That the civil servants are employed by the Federal Government?

      I believe the poster meant to say that while it is part of the government, and its employees are federal employees, the post office is an independent corporation. The government cut it loose in 1970. While it may be part of the government, no tax payer money goes to the USPS and the USPS runs itself as it sees fit. And this is why they can do whatever they want with Microsoft. For more info you might see history of usps.

      --
      //m
    3. Re:What are you smoking? by John+Murdoch · · Score: 2
      Let's look at another thing "powering" the US post office by way of compairison. Jeeps. You see them all over, as they won bids on an open market. The Post Office Jeeps were stripped of all insignia and were only recognizable by their form. No cardboard cut outs recomending the purchase of Jeeps ever kept the sun from shining through a USPO window. No "test drives" were ever offered. Instead, Jeep was happy to be making the sale and the use was recomendation enough. The USPO had no intentions of recomending one automobile maker over another.

      Except, well, that the USPS doesn't buy them from Jeep. (Jeep, BTW, isn't a company. Jeep is a brand of DaimlerChrysler.) The USPS buys vehicles from a variety of vendors, under contract. Here, for instance, is an article (with photo) about the USPS buying electric-powered mail vehicles from Ford.

      If you browse the New Business Ideas page of the USPS web site, you'll find that the Post Office is looking for new ways to generate revenue. That's why there are Federal Express drop boxes outside post offices these days--and why Federal Express is hauling Express Mail for the USPS. If they can get Microsoft to pay them money to distribute advertising in the post office, how is that different from AOL paying them to carpet-bomb America with sign-up CDs? The more ways the USPS finds to produce revenue, the lower postage costs will be. Is that a bad thing?

    4. Re:What are you smoking? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      And hasn't the mail service really improved since then!

      I think that 1 out of 100 pieces of mail ends up at another house in the neighborhood, though since some of them never turn up, I'm not sure.

      USPO, the best advertisement for FedEx and UPS!
      .

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:What are you smoking? by Erris · · Score: 2
      >their tax dollars

      You mean the USPS is not entirely funded by postage?

      I buy stamps with my whiskey too. It's another form of tax.

      So many tecnicalities, so few people who can see the forest through the trees. A federally mandated and protected exclusive franchise is a part of the government, regardless of what it's called. We pay for it, it serves us and it should not be used to promote some of us over others. The social costs of government franchise abuse like that can easily be seen in the ruins of the Soviet Union. There are a limited number of natural monopolies where it's in the best interest of the public to co-operate and mandate standards, software, publishing, or hairdressing for that matter are not it. The Post Office is not a tool of it's current director, it's OUR TOOL and this stuff violates the spirit of the law if not the letter.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    6. Re:What are you smoking? by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      Somewhat off-topic: My mom's husband worked for UPS for many years, and he still follows their business (he should, he has plenty of stock). I remember him being particularly miffed when the USPS inked a deal with FedEx to be their "preferred overnight delivery provider" -- in other words, you could go in to a post office and request an overnight package, and you would get it send by FedEx. Talk about favoring one corporation over another! I don't think UPS was ever given the opportunity to bid, though I could be wrong.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  80. Re:So what? by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    FYI: The Post Office is a private company (still somewhat affiliated with the U.S. government as a legal monopoly). They are under a board of governors that approves postal rates and various other things, but just like a corporation, they have to turn a profit.

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  81. Just goes to show.... by ZoneGray · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just goes to show what ruthless monopolists they are.

    Microsoft isn't so nice, either.

  82. Re:Take them all. Be like Bill. by Malcontent · · Score: 2

    If MS did not want you to take them they would not have put them there.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  83. Re:So what? by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2

    jazman_777 wrote:

    > Question: is it _being_ a monopoly that is bad for consumers?

    Of course not. It is possible (at least in an ideal world) to have a company become a monopoly because it has the best quality products for a fair price and it always treats the customers fairly. Once this fictional company got to be a monopoly, they always try extra hard to make sure they are giving everybody a fair shake, constantly innovating, keeping those customers and their employies happy, etc. I don't see our fictional company getting into any antitrust trouble.

    Microsoft's deal is that it got its monopoly by being a bully, it is keeping its monopoly by being a meanie, and it is using that monopoly to get itself more monopolies so it can have more people to bully and be mean to. To Microsoft, competition is not a fair game between friendly rivals. It is a brutal conquest, a war whose victims litter the landscape, and in which Microsoft cheats any chance it can get. Microsoft has raised prices, tossed quality, service, and real innovation in the dumpster, and in general, has made a bloody illegal nuisance of itself. It has committed crimes, and it looks like it will never pay for them. Microsoft thinks it is above the law. The problem is not an overbearing government, but one that chickened out at the end.

    Microsoft can escape the law, but can it escape justice? Even if the dissenting states loose, there are still civil suits that can be brought based on the guilty verdict. Like say, the one Netscape just filed. ;)

    "The path of peace is yours to discover for eternity."
    "Mosura", 1961

  84. Re:What's next? by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    Dude, $730 billion are spent each year on military stuff around the world. How the hell could they need even more money?

  85. Re:so what? by glwtta · · Score: 2

    Did you know that it is illegal to attempt to compete against the USPS with mail delivery

    I am still waiting to see how that whole Trystero thing pans out...

    W.A.S.T.E.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  86. My thoughts.. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    1: The USPS isn't exactly the most profitable (simi) part of the government. Its become more and more seperated in the last few decades. By the time your average slashdot reader reaches his 25th birthday, it may not exist anymore, unless its reabsorbed into the government in entirety. Advertising is good thing in this case, i would assume. I don't think it would be long before we start seeing "banner ads" imprinted on envelopes. I'll refrain from commenting on my opinions of the apropriateness of the release of XP for this bit of slashdot satire.

    2: I forsee soon a slashdot story..
    "Bill Gates trying to kill journalists!"

    A noticably weakened Bill Gates today sneezed at a 4 PM press conference announcing his philantrhopic extension to the public library system. Gates later was diagnosted with a potentially fatal and communicable illness "Influenza".

    While covering the conference in his boxers, in his living room, Rob Malda noted that a member of the press who, at one time made a snide remark about Windows 3.1 being "Broken", was standing directly in front of and below Gates.

    "I can only assume this was a pre-planned attack against the media. Gates will not stand for negative press, and, being the dark god Azmodeus himself, his vengence knows no limit of time".

    When asked if this could be attributed to circumstance, or wild speculation on his part, he denied the accusation and began screaming "bitchslap dot pee ell! BITCHSLAP DOT PEE ELL!".

    Hemos and Timothy could not be reached for comment.

    Members of the mainstream media were not at a loss for words with this issue, mentioning:

    "The things a mind can come up with, when deprived of intelligent human contact" -- Hugh Downs

    "And you *LISTENED* to him?! He doesn't even have a mastery of the english language" -- Wolf Blitzer

    "Jesus Christ.." -- Jesus Christ

    "Taco is correct.. [What follows was a long-winded, dicursive diatribe blaming Bill Gates for Columbine. Omitted for the sake of brevity.]" -- Jon Katz

    "I posted this story three minutes before he did" -- chrisd

  87. I'm thinking more constructive... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Use the discs as runners in a Tesla Turbine.

    They'd make pretty nifty ones for a small fluid pump... :-)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  88. My two cents by vex24 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it's just because I'm drunk, but I think the USPS are a bunch of filthy whores already anway... The damn change-of-address cards come with 25 advertisements, and the first thing they do with your new address is send it out to all the local spammers anyway... The USPS will do anything to keep from laying off excess employees, which is a bit noble if you think of it that way... Now stay away from my wife! No, I'm just kidding, you're my best friend... really, I mean that... just kidding about that... G'night people!

    --

    People shape laws. Not the other way around.

  89. Nice spin by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Funny
    Microsoft Windows XP: It's Not Just A Good Idea, It's The Government

    :D

    1. Re:Nice spin by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Microsoft Windows XP: It's Not Just A Good Idea, It's The Government

      The US Government: It's Not Just A Good Idea, It's a Microsoft subsidiary.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  90. USPS, the Microsoft of the US Government by detritus. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After working in the shipping business, I learned quickly how the USPS is the government equivalent of Microsoft. Try sending an overnight letter via UPS or Federal Express to a PO Box. It can't be done. Why? Simple: The USPS forces senders to use their mail services.
    When you are a business with no competition, you have no reason to improve. IMO, anybody would be crazy to send something of crucial value or importance via any postal service and expect the same service as a private equivalent (UPS/FedEx/Airbourne).
    They are a corporate monopoly with government protection. Not to mention, the only government agency I have seen that runs TV ads ("Fly Like An Eagle" crap).

  91. Please allow me to bitch about slahsdot for a bit. by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just a general rant.

    Look at my "submit story" history we see the following:

    2001-11-21 06:59:10 Javascript cookie vulerablity in Opera (articles,security) (rejected)
    2001-11-25 22:09:39 Human embryo cloned (articles,news) (rejected)
    2001-12-05 06:14:01 Earth based telescopes now have potential to match (articles,news) (rejected)

    And this, this makes it to the front page of Slashdot? WTF!? No, it needs to be expanded:
    What
    The
    Fuck!?
    I mean seriously? This has what to do with what exactly? MS in the post office? God forbid that there should be some commercialism in the US Junkmail distribution system. I mean my god, what's next, the post office advertising on TV? Or maybe they'll raise prices on stamps or something.

    I mean really. Slashdot is so inconsistent it, it... Well, I guess we all expect it now, but, god

    Ok, now go ahead and mod me down.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  92. no, sorry, not a crippled full version by Barbarian · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure that the "Demo" is this: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/evaluation/ tours/demos/default.asp on a CD, i.e. a bunch of AVI files probably with an auto-execing viewer.

  93. Re:What About AOL CDs!? by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    AOL is not a monopoly abusing it's marketshare power to destroy competitors. It's a simple-in-concept online community that got so rich it bought everything it liked. But at least it doesn't dictate terms to Dell about online services included on the desktop.

    And, well, we just don't like Microsoft, I guess. They're nasty wankers, mate.

  94. Conseptions of MS Windows by joonasl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess the reason people are generally not outraged by this kind of marketing is that Microsoft Windows is not in a way considered to be a "product" in the traditional sense of the word by general public. If you would ask 100 Joe Random Users to draw a computer, 95 of them would draw a Windows desktop. In peoples minds,MS Windows has become THE operating system instead of A operating system and a integrated essential part of any computer.

    --
    "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
  95. This is still a valid Public Policy decision by i1984 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The advertisement of Microsoft software in the United States Post Office should be subject to public policy review, irrespective of the Postals Service's technical corporate status.

    Microsoft is a convicted monopolist that has shown no remorse for its actions, and scarcely acknowledges that it has done any wrong. Ideally, the government would not be helping to pormote this malignancy.

    It has been repeated many times throughout this discussion, first that the Post Office is part of the US government, only to have that assertion contradicted to the effect that the Postal Service is actually an independant corporation established and run by the government -- posters have also pointed out that the Federal Government is the sole shareholder, appoints the directors, and as needed bails the service out to the tune of a billion dollars.

    All this is missing the point: the government shouldn't be helping spread the monopoly even if the post office is technically independent. The service still answers to Congress, and does arguably more so than most other businesses. This sort of issue is well within the domain of public policy -- even if no policies currently exist that are relevant to this situation.

    In a broader sense, corporations in general also answer to Congress (even in cases like Enron where they'd rather not!), and by extension we regulate all of them in numerous ways as well. In comparison to wholly indepenent and totally private corporations it should be easy to shape a public policy in regards to a pseudo-governmental organization like the post office -- even if it means appointing a board of directors who agree that convicted monopolists shouldn't have the privilege of advertising in Postal Service buildings.

    This is also why this is a relevant Slashdot story. It involves what amounts to a public policy decision (or lack thereof) that affects technology that the Slashdot community cares about: Microsoft, monopolies, the blurred line between the public and private sector, and public policy regarding these topics.

  96. USPS major Public Relations Lift by GdoL · · Score: 2, Funny

    USPS had a great idea. People are always complaing about their services. So now when they enter in on of those postoffices they will have someone else to blame.

    .-))

    --

    ------I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.------
  97. Re:So you're upset about...? by Alsee · · Score: 2

    I agree, the USPS was selling Looney Tunes stamps

    The post office loves making specialty stamps because it's pure profit every time someone buys them as a collectible and never uses them.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  98. I repeat, so what? by edibleplastic · · Score: 2
    Just because they're connected with the government and has special privileges doesn't mean that they're not allowed to deal with private corporations. The fact that the USPS is currently in a seven year partnership with Federal Express (a corporation) apparently doesn't seem to matter to you.


    Whether or not it's wise for them to do this with MS is another issue, but it is most certainly within their jurisdiction to do so.

    1. Re:I repeat, so what? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Just because they're connected with the government and has special privileges doesn't mean that they're not allowed to deal with private corporations. The fact that the USPS is currently in a seven year partnership with Federal Express (a corporation) apparently doesn't seem to matter to you.

      How would you feel if the USPS were to team up with the Mafia? Which are a better analogy with Microsoft than Federal Express.

  99. Re:so what? by mpe · · Score: 2

    A couple of centuries ago, it was "Manifest Destiny", and the US thought they had the moral imperitive to take all land west to the Pacific.

    Then a hundred years later "to the pacific" became "half way across the pacific" :)

  100. Re:so what? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    Could that picture be more of a pitch for a cheesy cop show? "U.S. Postal Inspection Service", starring Chuck Studley as Inspector Bulge Gently, with Mary Clogg as Special Inspector Katy Aryan and Jane Smith as tenuously Hispanic Undercover Investigator Jennifer Aquilera. Plus other ethnic minority people! In the background! Doing the filing, or something!

    Episode #1: This Time It's Federal...

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  101. Re:so what? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    Actually, separation of Church and State is explicit in the US Constitution

    Show me. There's a copy here for your reading pleasure.

    has been upheld by the US Supreme Court, as well as lower Courts, in numerous cases.

    I agree. That's what makes it a current working philosophy.

    you won't tell my neighbors what church to attend by wrapping yourself in a flag of official sanction. I'll petition, file suits, but then in extremity, I'll shoot you in the head to stop you.

    And if you try to stop one of my Christian, Islamic or Athestic fellow citizens from being *able* to proselytize, I'll shoot back. As I said, there is a prohibition against the state mandating a specific religion at the federal level, but nothing says that citizens cannot discuss their beliefs in public places, be that on a street corner, post office or a bible study group meeting at a school.

    Or are you saying that not *all* free speech should be protected, just the kind you like, and not *all* philosophies should be allowed, just the ones you approve of? I was taught religion as a matter of course in both high school and college at three secular schools, and to ignore something that has shaped the history and development of cultures around the world (including ours) is more than asinine, it's willful ignorance.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  102. What if RedHat did this? by edibleplastic · · Score: 2

    Would anybody be calling the USPS biased or giving in to corporations if suddenly they started handing out free RedHat cds and avertising their service plan? I don't think so. That would just be considered "advertising" not "creating a dangerous link between corporation and state" as many people have written. *sigh*

  103. Re:This is perfect. by Junta · · Score: 2

    As much as your arguments may have sound logical reasoning, it really means nothing to consumers who don't develop. Consumers could care less how much of a pain in the ass it was for developers, they just care what they see. On that front, I think KDE, Gnome, and others offer a lot more power in their interfaces than Windows, and provided a pre-install, would be as easy to use as Windows, except you can't download any old application on the internet and expect it to run. MS seems less concerned about actually improving the product and more about making it different enough for an upgrade, while leveraging their position in the OS market to control other markets (IE, Media-related stuff (WMP, CD burning, simple movie editor)) All this said about developer space issues not making much of a difference, your argument still has a couple of flaws, so I do have some counterpoints:

    1) The way drivers work in XFree isn't horrible, it's the amount of work required on behalf of the user that isn't so hot given the current tools. Automated tools to modify the XF86Config and copy files around can make things easier on the end user. But there is good reason why this can't be done as a simple tab on a nice control panel, Windows lets common users wreak all kinds of hell with the system, while Linux distros don't want things to be world writable... The core architecture is fine, it is user-space tools that keep this from working well. Just look at BeOS, loading device drivers was as simple as dragging it to a certain directory. I would argue a User would be more comfortable using a "wizard" interface, even if it doesn't have to do much, over copying a file, it just doesn't have that "customized" feel to it, if you understand me.

    I have no idea about 2, probably a valid issue, considering the titles available for Windows vs. Linux, DirectX dominates and will continue to, unless MS loses a lot of market share for some inexplicable reason.

    3) Hurd is a piece of crap. That said, Linux has "enough" modularity to provide the benefits that would be seen at the user level. Things like drivers can be loaded as modules with little difficulty. Of course, the problem is that modules are tied to kernel modules, but as nVidia shows, you can make a thin source layer to load a binary-only driver that enables a closed-source driver to run on different kernel revs. Of course , the layer should probably be available in the kernel itself, but kernel developers want open source drivers, something much easier to debug...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  104. Great Bedfellows!! by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seeing as Microsoft and USPS are two monopolies that excel in crappy service, why would anyone be surprised to see them picking each other's noses?

  105. Re:So what? by chris_mahan · · Score: 2

    How much you want to bet that if they don't turn a profit, our taxes will bail them out?

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  106. Simple: PO needs $, Msft has $. EOT by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    subj says it all.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  107. No Problem! by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Apparently Microsoft has promotional displays with free WindowsXP promotional software in U.S. Post Offices.

    Wait, don't tell me - these promotional displays for Windows XP are hanging right next those posters the USPS has warning about

    Suspicious Mail Alert

    [Warning: gratuitous MS bashing ahead. Mature audiences only.]

    Given all the latest scares about anthrax spores being distributed via US Mail, I'd say that Windows XP would constitute a similarly receptive medium for distributing viral agents and that such posters are not at all out of place.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  108. Appropriate by HiThere · · Score: 2

    What could be more appropriate than MS's picture next to the others on the Post Office wall. Too bad it doesn't say "Dead or Alive".

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  109. Taxes? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    But this is about taxes. The MS tax.
    .

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  110. This is NEWS??? by jxqvg · · Score: 2, Funny
    Do any of you ever go to a postoffice? These ads have been up since before XP's release!
    Slashdot: Old News For Nerds. Stuff That Mattered Last Year
  111. Re:So what? by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    I have no doubts whatsoever on that score. They operate in that wierd area of a legal monopoly (kind of like utility companies before Texas !@#$!@#$ deregulated them). It's one of the few monopolies that I think is a good idea.

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  112. Re:Coming and Going by elmegil · · Score: 2

    when I need premium service I can pay premium prices. When I just need it to get there sometime this month, FedEx is not practical, and not in any way in competition with so called "first class" mail.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  113. Re:Separation of church and state in First Amendme by cornflux · · Score: 2

    i am talking about the specific phrase "separation of church and state"

    thank you.

  114. Re:Coming and Going by elmegil · · Score: 2
    Shredded mail? How often does that really happen, I mean really...

    About once a month, because the mail delivery person tries to carelessly shove 4 or 5 catalogs (that I haven't even requested) through the mail slot along with a magazine that I'm subscribed to. About half the time the magazine is on the outside of the bundle and is the thing that gets shredded. Complaints get me nowhere.

    I didn't say my mail was shredded before delivery, it's shredded DURING delivery.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  115. Re:This is perfect. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

    No they're not; you on crack, boy? The GLX driver's only available as a binary. Only the NVdriver has the source code available for it, and that's a simple pass-thru driver that hands stuff back and forth to the GLX portion. Look for yourself. Open Source my ass..