Slashdot Mirror


Apple @ MacWorld Tokyo

rschroeder writes "Apple updated several products at MacWorld Tokyo tonight (or tomorrow morning). A $499 10-gig iPod, with, get this, custom laser engraving on the back, ($49 extra) and vCard support. They also announced a $49 USB bluetooth module, shipping in April, with beta drivers availble today. Among other tricks, Jobs synced a Clie with a mac via bluetooth. Also a new 23" (1920x1200 )Cinema Display. Jobs also said they're raising the price of the iMac due to LCD and RAM cost increases. All this courtesy MacMinute.com's live coverage." Maccentral has several stories about Jobs' keynote at the convention.

150 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. Monitor envy by faust2097 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was waiting for someone to outdo the 22" Cinema Display, funny it was Apple that ended up doing it themselves.

    1. Re:Monitor envy by jimbolaya · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sun has a 24.1" LCD display, which offers the same resolution of the new Apple display, though about $1000 more (from what I've read from other sources). Still, I drool over the Apple display.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    2. Re:Monitor envy by frinkster · · Score: 4, Informative

      This new monitor has a much higher pixel density than the 22" LCD. The old 22" LCD had a density of about 85 pixels per inch while this new 23" LCD has a pixel density of about 100 pixels per inch. Nice!

    3. Re:Monitor envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      [b] This item is purely a stylish accessory for Mac-users with too much money.[/b]

      I like people with too much money. Both Apple and myself are targetting Hollywood. It's one of the few demographics where riches and low education meet.(the others are lottery winners, but they tend to bankrupt themselves on gold plated trailers).

      Hugs and kisses,

      L. Ron Hubbard

    4. Re:Monitor envy by doorbot.com · · Score: 2

      Samsung has a SyncMaster 240T, which has, among other things, multiple inputs (DVI/Analog D-Sub), picture by picture, picture in picture, etc.

      If you're a HD freak, check out Samsung's upcoming 241MP, which will support composite inputs as well, and includes a TV tuner. It's HDTV compatible. Pricing will be around $7000.

    5. Re:Monitor envy by bmetz · · Score: 2

      Viewsonic's got a 23.1" lcd for $3358 on pricewatch. Of course since it doesn't have apple's proprietary USB+DVI+Power plugs you also
      save $150 on not having to buy a converter to use
      with your PC.

      Note: You can get the Apple 23" for $3,289 if you're a student.

      --
      What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    6. Re:Monitor envy by daviddennis · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I had the money, I'd be in line at the Apple Store to buy it the second it opened tomorrow (or whenever it actually became available).

      As it is, I'll be saving my pennies, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if I buy one with my next Mac, later this year.

      That's how much I love using high-resolution displays.

      I currently have a SGI 1600SW display, which is the same resolution as the Cinema Display, but smaller. Even with this 1600x1024 display, I run out of screen real estate with painful ease. Increasing it to 1900x1200 would really help me. A lot.

      I think almost anyone involved in video, especially with Final Cut Pro's screen-gobbling new features, would feel the same.

      D

    7. Re:Monitor envy by FFFish · · Score: 2

      So what you're saying is that the Sun LCD has a lower effective resolution (dot pitch) and higher cost...

      Little wonder you're drooling at the Apple display!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    8. Re:Monitor envy by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Too bad the SyncMaster 240T doesn't support 1920x1200 in DVI mode.

    9. Re:Monitor envy by pangloss · · Score: 2

      actually that's not correct. it didn't support it prior to late last year, but any newly mfg'ed 240T will. i've even read a report of one user sending his earlier rev monitor back to samsung who replaced the board for free.

      really, the issue is finding a card that supports better than 1600x1200 via dvi.

      there's another korean company which makes a monitor very similar to the 240T (same glass, different electronics, pivot but no remote) from a company called wide.

      this also is a 1900x1200 native lcd with multiple inputs. i think they still bundle a geforce2mx that does 1900x1200 via dvi.

    10. Re:Monitor envy by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      Converter? Can you please post details? I am in love with the 17" Apple panel on my Mac at work, and am about to spend 6k on IBM's 21" panel for my Windows box. If I can use one of the new Apple panels for my PC I'll save a few grand. (though their resolution doesn't equal the IBM's 2048 x 1536)

      BTW, the ViewSonic's 1600*1200 resolution doesn't stack up to the apple. That 300*1200 extra pixels is another 20% more resolution.

    11. Re:Monitor envy by PaxTech · · Score: 2
      I think almost anyone involved in video... would feel the same.

      It's not just video editing.. I do website development and recently got a Mac with a 22" Cinema Display and I know I'm way more productive with it. I have a 17" LCD plugged into the secondary VGA port running at 1280x1024 so I have an effective 2880x1024 desktop.

      Nothing will enhance your computing experience more than a SHITLOAD of screen real estate.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    12. Re:Monitor envy by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perdo, I don't think you understand HOW video editors use their monitors. The absolute picture quality is not at issue because you always use a real D1 monitor for looking at your actual output (interlaced video and strict video phosphor primary specs makes this essential). What editors DO require is tons and tons of real estate, low heat output and the low flicker doesn't hurt. These Apple Cinema displays are absolutely spot-on for Avid or FCP work, it's just a shame that they cost so damn much. I would LOVE to have one.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    13. Re:Monitor envy by Jordy · · Score: 2

      Of course the ultimate LCD monitor is the IBM T221.

      At 22.3" it has a 16x10 aspect ratio and native resolution of 3840x2400. Of course it is also $9000, but that's beside the point now isn't it?

      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    14. Re:Monitor envy by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think there's any call for "you are a fool" style insults here. We're just having a friendly discussion. Or so I would hope.

      I've been editing video for months now on my 1600SW and haven't had any problems with it at all. It works great for me.

      What's wonderful about LCDs is that they have much sharper text, and it remains sharp throughout the life of the unit. CRTs start reasonably sharp, but degrade over time.

      When I replaced my 19" Sony with the 1600SW, I couldn't believe how much crisper and sharper it was.

      Since most of us spend a ton of time entering and editing text, that's a huge advantage for the LCD. The lack of flicker is also great for the eyes.

      If you got the bucks, buy a LCD. That's still my advice.

      D

    15. Re:Monitor envy by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      It's not quite that bad because of the extra width. But you are right that there is a problem.

      When I switched to MacOS X, I had a 19" Sony which I always ran at 1152x864 as the most comfortable resolution. As soon as I got X, the I switched it to 1280x1024 and got roughly the same experience.

      Anti-aliased text definitely looks best at higher screen DPI. If you go to the Apple Store and look at the original Cinema Display, you'll see the anti aliasing looks a little rough. It actually looks better on the 1600SW due to the higher DPI. But the Cinema Display is a lot brighter.

      It's too bad the best MacOS X experience is restricted to the select few who can afford a $3,500 monitor, and I say that even as someone who's quite likely to join that elite group.

      D

    16. Re:Monitor envy by pangloss · · Score: 2

      visit the WideScreen Wiki

      You'll have to navigate around a bit, but you'll find pretty much everything about hooking up apple lcd's to pc's there.

    17. Re:Monitor envy by jcr · · Score: 2

      Flat panels have not yet surpassed CRTs for visual quality

      I beg to differ.. You can't beat discrete pixels for clarity.

      Incidentally, Apple's panels are considerably better than SGI's for color gamut, contrast, and viewing angle.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    18. Re:Monitor envy by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      No argument there. I bought my 1600SW as a $695 closeout, so it was a major, major bargain compared to the old Cinema Display. It would be nicer if it were brighter, but that's hardly worth the major price difference from what I paid for the SGI.

      The new Cinema Display, though, is, because it brings higher resolution to the table, too.

      D

  2. Info on the new iPod software by MotownAvi · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just installed the new 1.1 software on my 5gb iPod with no difficulty. Comments:

    Contacts: The way this works is that when you upgrade to 1.1, you get a top-level folder on the iPod named "Contacts". Drop .vcf files in there, and you're off. Cute, but since I have my Palm all the time, it's less useful to me.

    Equalizer: Can't comment since I haven't set it for any songs.

    Now Playing: Pressing the center button when playing a song no longer switches between elapsed time and time remaining. The normal display now shows both. If you press the button, you get the diamond-in-the-rectangle of iTunes, and you can use the dial to shuttle backwards and forwards. Trés cool.

    Shuffle: You can now choose between shuffling between songs or between albums. I'm not quite sure what that means.

    Bugs fixed: The bug where pausing and then unpausing would land you somewhere totally else appears to be fixed. Another bug where the iPod would cut songs off at the end is also fixed. Alas, the one that prevents "Dvorak" (with the accent over the r) from displaying properly is still present.

    Easter Egg: It's still there, in the Legal section off the Settings main item.

    And of course, more languages that I don't understand.

    Avi

    1. Re:Info on the new iPod software by flynt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shuffle: You can now choose between shuffling between songs or between albums. I'm not quite sure what that means.

      Allow me to clarify. Shuffling between songs would take all your songs and play them in random order.

      Shuffling albums would take all your albums and play them in random order. So, Album2, Album4,Alubum3..etc...

    2. Re:Info on the new iPod software by plastik55 · · Score: 2
      Equalizer: Can't comment since I haven't set it for any songs.


      Look in Settings->EQ. It now allows you to change the setting on the fly, whereas with the old firmware you had to set the EQ for songs with iTunes. You get to choose from a menu with such names as "Bass Booster," "Latin," "Deep," and "Pop." OK, but I would have liked a little graphic showing me what each setting did


      Another change: the backlight timer can be set for 10 sec (previous max was 5 sec.)

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    3. Re:Info on the new iPod software by happystink · · Score: 2

      no, shuffling in one album means you hear random songs from one album. the other oen means you hear random songs from ANY album.

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

    4. Re:Info on the new iPod software by krugdm · · Score: 2

      Sigh. Still waiting for View by Album in addition to playlist and artist. Not a show-killer by any means, but it still would be convienient.

    5. Re:Info on the new iPod software by krugdm · · Score: 2

      Here's my problem: Suppose I have a compilation CD, like the Movie X soundtrack for instance. When I rip the CD in iTunes, it goes to CDDB to fill in all the album info. Movie X gets filled in for the album name, and the artist fields are filled in by the artist who did each song.

      Now, after I sync with my iPod, how do I play the Movie X soundtrack? Can't go under Artists, because the album has been split up amongst the 12 different artists who did songs for the soundtrack. The only workaround is to make a playlist for each album I have and go that way, but then you've lost one of the reasons for having that data there in the first place.

      Now I'm not saying that you need to be able to sort your collection by every ID3 field available, but it would seem that Album would be an obvious one to have stuck in there.

      Although, come to think of it, why not? If I feel that it is important that I have set my iTunes view to show Title, Album, Artist, and Genre, then why couldn't iTunes pass that along to the iPod so that the Main Menu showed those four?

  3. sounds fair by chabegger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    raising the price of the iMac sounds like a fair deal to me... any other computer manufacturer would raise the price of their stuff if supply was low... just simple economics. i think this is a good move to apple, although it might make some people mad (minus those with pre-orders)

    1. Re:sounds fair by ostiguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any other manufacturor might not have done such a foolish thing as integrating the display. Seriously, I am not trolling here - just look at the attempted consolidation in the ram market right now. I think every area of the it industry had hardware surplus based on skyrocking demand for 5 straight years, and then stopped. Apple probably viewed the cheap lcd prices as a natural parallel to the hard drive and cpu performance inc. vs price metrics, whereas the lcd prices were probably very depressed by massive overproduction.

      Having to raise prices is truly ridiculous. It just hurts apple even more in the last 9 months of this year as the x86 folks keep pushing the mhz gap higher, and thus the apple/x86 price comparison keep getting worse for apple.

    2. Re:sounds fair by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yeah, being one of 2 PC makers in the Black this year,having 60 million in the bank and having no debt can realy Hurt, it hurts realy realy realy bad.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:sounds fair by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 3, Funny

      An AC wrote:

      > I love you apple zealots. Apple addicts is the closest thing to a secular
      > cult I have ever seen.
      >
      > Um wait I take that back, apple addicts think Steve Jobs is god.

      The beautiful, protecting, heroic, wonder-working deity Mothra is the great Goddess that resurrected Apple from the dead (and parted the Pacific for good measure).

      Toho is her prophet.

      Steve Jobs is her servant and messenger.

      Apple is her champion to put right the wrongs of Microsoft, the RIAA, and the MPAA.

      Homage to King Shisa (mistranslated as Seesar or Caesar),
      Guardian of Okinawa and Friend of the Mac,
      on the occasion of his 38th birthday.
      ("Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla" 1974, "Mothra 2" 1997)

    4. Re:sounds fair by Perdo · · Score: 3

      Build a Mac yourself for $500...

      Build a PC yourself for $500...

      See the difference now?

      I'm in the black. And I didn't raise the barrier to entry on my product more than the cost of a new computer.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    5. Re:sounds fair by netsharc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Come on, Apple bashing is no longer cool, they're a Unix now! A good GUI on top of a good-functioning OS internals make for a fine computer, and if it doesn't have the software you want, you can always compile *free* Unix software or install Linux on it. What, you don't like Linux?

      :)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    6. Re:sounds fair by maggard · · Score: 2
      Exactly. You can not build a Mac from parts. You have to pay Apple's premium price for inferior hardware.

      Really?

      Interestingly when the new iMacs came out every journalist thought to get clever and actually went out and compared it with other similar machines from Dell, Gateway, etc (your $500 special comes with crap components, no integration, no OS or software & no support.) The universal result? The new iMac was about spot on for price. It had FireWire where PCs might have USB2, other little differences, but for each reviewer it was about a hundred bucks up or down in price with an equivalent PC.

      Apple is "in the black" on the backs of their sucker die hard fanboys.

      Oh, so you're just some trolling wacko yearning for the old my-OS-is-bigger-then-your-OS days. What, the Viagra give out so now you gotta get your jollies baiting Macolytes? Go try and twiddle your BIOS again.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    7. Re:sounds fair by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Similar Machine:

      Duron 1 Ghz (the G4,PIII and Duron Perform the same clock for clock)
      Abit NV7m GeForce 2 graphics, everything built in. Micro ATX for small footprint like the iMac.
      128mb DDR ram, better memory but cheaper than crippled 100fsb SDRAM
      40mb hard drive.
      24x disk burner.
      micro ATX case.
      Keyboard, optical mouse.
      Firewire Card.
      $401 for a pc computer, as fast if not faster than the iMac.
      $300 for a 15 inch TFT active-matrix liquid crystal display

      EXACTLY HALF THE PRICE.

      Now, with the $1400 budget:

      XP 1800, about as fast as a 1.5 Ghz G4 (HA!)
      ASUS A7V333 Motherboard.
      1 GB DDR333 ram
      TWO 160 GB drives mirrored or striped depending on your pleasure (does the mac support drive sizes this large? ;)
      GeForce 3
      DVD drive
      40x burner
      Case, Wireless Keyboard, Wireless Optical Mouse
      Firewire Card, Gigabit Ethernet.
      19" perfect flat usb monitor

      Certainly a system comparable with a high end G4

      For the Price of a dual 1 Ghz G4 "Ultimate":

      Dual AMD MP 2000+ @ 1666mhz each
      Asus A7M266D AMD 760MPX
      1.5 GB DDR ram
      1/2 TERABYTE OF DRIVE SPACE.
      Geforce 4 Ti 4600/128MB ram
      DVD Burner
      40x CD burner
      Firewire Card
      8 channel IDE raid (hardware not software)
      22" perfect flat usb monitor.

      Plain and simple. Apple hardware is inferior and over priced.

      To hell with Dell, Gateway, etc. They don't get my dollars either.

      Alpha-Techie, my ass. You better get with the program, I'd never hire you with the emotional bias you place on hardware. Computers are Tools. I want the best tools at the best price. I do not want some Mac zealot who will break my budget on shiny glossy pretty slow boxes.

      That's like putting pom-poms and rhinestones on a Hole-Hawg... actually macs are more like 3.3v cordless drils in comparison so maybe pop-poms are the right idea.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    8. Re:sounds fair by d0n+quix0te · · Score: 2, Informative

      Corrections:

      They were profitable in the 1st qtr (a good achievement given the circumstances), 2nd qtr may be a different issue.

      Also they have > $4 billion in the bank.

    9. Re:sounds fair by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Looking over your post, son, I would say that you're the one being a touch emotional. He makes a point andthen you spend how long trying to disprove it in a "mine's bigger than yours" type of pissing contest.

      I wouldn't hire you to work help desk phones.

    10. Re:sounds fair by znu · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that if you're selling more of something that you can make, at your current prices, you'd be stupid to cut them in order to make them more competitive.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    11. Re:sounds fair by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Build a Mac yourself for $500...

      Build a PC yourself for $500...

      See the difference now?


      No, but yet again I see the standard PC-centric attitude applied to the Mac side of the computing world and yet again I wonder what this is supposed to prove. Let's go over this one more time, and this time I'll try to avoid polysyllables so it will be easier to understand.

      Okay, sitting comfy? Let's begin...

      People who buy Macs do not want to build the machine themselves. They want it to work out of the box and are willing to pay for that.

      Criticizing Macs on the basis that you can't build one cheap is nothing short of a non sequitur. It make sense only to someone who doesn't use Macs. To us Mac users, it makes no sense and says more about the person doing the criticism than it does about Apple.

      --Rick

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    12. Re:sounds fair by Perdo · · Score: 2

      "They want it to work out of the box and are willing to pay for that"

      Work out of the box...

      Like when a new Mac randomly chooses the startup disk and operating system because it has never been started before, even just to do a system check? Just a miniscule ammount of quality control and uniform user experience would be nice.

      Is it the free year of CompuServe 2000 you can get as a buying incentive that has no OS X client and runs as an application that breaks your connection when you run software update because Macs have to shut down all running applications to do installs?

      Is it the message "Mac OS is trying to shut down, please wait for mac os to shut down before trying to shut down."

      Is it when AppleTalk grabs the printer port because it cannot see a connection on the Ethernet, preventing you from file sharing or printing?

      Is it when Apple issues a firmware update that disables any ram that is not cas latency 322, even if it is better than cas 322, and to disable the check for "inferior ram" (you didn't pay apples 200% markup on ram) there is an easter egg hunt involving holding down secret keys while opening the memory control panel?

      Is it having to use guesswork to manage each individual application's memory usage because the operating system will not take care of it for you?

      Is it the hidden cost of OS X of running extremely poorly on the stock memory provided with apples requiring you to "purchase" a smooth running OS X for the price that apple sells their 200% markup memory for?

      Is it the chipping paint on the TiBook, cracks in the Cube, useless handles and front foot of the iMac, misaligned hinges on the clamshell iBook, soft, easily scratched surface of the new ibook or flimsy plastic catch mechanism on the G4 Tower, that requires so much force to close that it is likely to break?

      Is it the recalled power supplies, out of focus iMac CRTs, chronically bad G4 motherboards, temperamental slot load drives, incomplete software automatic software updates, type -43925 errors with no explanation or documentation or the inability to use USB printer sharing with dynamic addresses and again no documentation telling you why it is not working?

      USB keyboards hubs constantly complaining of "not enough power" and going bad crashing the system. Absolutely no spill protection in any mac keyboard even though they were able to totally prevent a spill causing any damage to a Apple IIc twenty years ago? Designed in fragility so they can generate sales of a high margin item. A keyboard with USB hub is 30 bucks. Apple's is $80.

      Bet also that the corrupted preferences adds to ease of use too. Infinitely tall launcher just because you changed screen resolution, inability to send mail and having to install an entirely new client to let you setup an account again. Applications constantly reporting "I see you are running 'blah-bah' for the first time" No OS provisions to do a clean uninstall resulting in the machine accumulating more and more stray files, forcing a clean OS install to get a measure of sanity back. Rebuilding the desktop corrupting all your aliases, and all the apple scripts you wrote to automate the bug fixes you have to do on a daily basis because Apple will not fix them.

      Mac OS never enforcing any application privlages and no third party software vender even vaguely willing to undertake that momentous task because if Apple can't get something that fundamental right, how is anyone going to fix it for them?

      Lack of documentation on extensions that would allow you to get rid of the parasites that provide no benefit but rob an already slow machine of resources?

      Is it getting a brand new Mac with a burner just to find you have to download the disk burning software and extension from apple, instead of it coming pre-installed?

      Is it the 20+ hours you have to put into a brand new machine because it is not even close to being able to perform as advertised when you pull it out of the box?

      Is it the favorites menu filled to the brim already that you must empty before you can even use it as your favorites instead of what apple's marketing department thinks your favorites ought to be?

      Is it the hidden spell check button that you must move to a usable location in both apple works and Office 2001?

      Is it the crappy TCP/IP interface and application memory manager interface that will not let you make changes out of order?

      Is it the horrible window management that will not let you properly maximize a window to use ALL available desktop space, forcing you to give up screen real estate to "important" things like the taskbar, dock, blank desktop, apple menu, and the inert top of the window?

      I can build a PC out of parts and fully configure it in less man hours than it took to write this post including the time it takes to sit with my credit card and order the parts.

      Pay extra to work out of the box. Bullshit. Pay extra for nothing but image. I'll bet you own a 4×4 that has never been off the highway and a Mac that sits on your desk looking pretty because if you EVER use it you would run into the same troubles that I have had with Macs.

      Macs are fragile, slow, pretty and overpriced.

      "PC-centric" Hell, I ran kicking and screaming to PCs. Macs forced me to. Do I have an ax to grind? hell yes! An ax of thousands of wasted man hours and endless late night sessions praying that this fix or that fix might work.

      Find me some non-marketoid documentation for macs. Give me a troubleshooting procedure where the first option is not "Swap ot the motherboard". With what for god's sake? Shove a banana in the damn machine and fire her up?

      God, I could go on and on. Do you believe I work with macs? Do you belive that every PC I have built, weather running Linux or Windows 2000 is bullet proof only a few hours after recieving parts in the mail while a Mac NEVER becomes bullet proof after insane amounts of work?

      Macs sure are pretty but never talk about ease of use or digital hub with me. Digital hub is their way of saying, buy this overpriced computer, then buy software equil in value to the computer, then buy periferals equil to twice the value of the computer. Now you have a digital hub that costs as much as an economy car. Welcome to setup hell, nothing is going to work as advertised. Out of the box, can't print, burn, communicate, import images, edit movies, play video. Upgrade to quiktime ten!

      They want to help get you on the internet. asks you nicly twice, scoldingly once and threateningly once. They want you to register. "we want you to become part of the happy consumer collective. we want to sell you out to every direct marketing mass mailer on the planet with no opt out provisions." With over 180 Macs happily registered to me, Entire trees die every week just to get my attention. "Buy more mac crap! you were a sucker once, be a sucker again!"

      THIS IS THE MAC USER EXPERIENCE!

      I didn't even address speed. Save that for a later post.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    13. Re:sounds fair by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Suffice to say there are serious flaws in every previous version of mac OS. I have seen every flaw I described many, many times. Apple has a history of not fixing bugs until their next hardware release. Buy the new hardware, fix the bugs. New versions of Mac OS run like a dog on old hardware so, there are are no bug fixes for the hardware you paid too much money for, ever. If you want the bugs fixed, you have to fork over for new hardware. That was their policy and hook for upgrade. You are in that trap now. OS X still has flaws. The flaws will not be fixed. They took a year to fix the most obvious annoyances. The most severe annoyances will be fixed at about 10.6, which will not run on the hardware you have purchased. You will have to purchase new hardware or live with the bugs.

      On another note, the version of "free" ssh included in OS X is not licenced for commercial use, as you already know. But that doesn't matter anyway because no USB to Serial devices currently have drivers for mac OS X. So, you may have downloaded an SSH client for OS 9 or did a BSD God trick of writing drivers on the spot, but I really fucking doubt it.

      You might consider reasearch before you post since you do not seem to have any real experience on the platform and your only anecdotal eveidence is an obvious fabrication. Go back to hacking on your junior high school's iMacs.

      Have a nice Day! :)

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    14. Re:sounds fair by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Somebody name a SINGLE tool that this AC is refering too that does not have an equivlent (or superior) on the PC.

      (often times for free. . . .)

    15. Re:sounds fair by Perdo · · Score: 2

      "Last week, when a few hundred miles from home, I had need to access the serial console of lots of Sun hardware on short notice. So I ran out and bought an ibook, something I'd been meaning to do soon anyway."

      http://www.keyspan.com/support/macosx/usa/

      Hardly something you can go down to the local store to buy. So, you are saying that you had your handy-dandy keyspan adapter with you but not your old laptop... uh-huh.

      Which does require you to download drivers for:

      'The Windows-using admin with whom I was working started giving me instructions about downloading an ssh client.

      "No need, open ssh is part of the standard OS distribution."'


      Unless you happened to have your keyspan adapter and the keyspan driver CD with you, but you didn't even bring your laptop. Nice attempt to extricate yourself. But still a flawed fabrication.

      You have no credibility, so I will not take you at your word concerning your experience.

      Additionally, the page you referenced is the number one hit on google for os x usb serial adapter. I can only surmise that you did some research after the fact to support your post because a month ago, the number one google hit for the same query was a press release touting Keyspan's OS X beta drivers, which caused the OS 9 drivers to cease function, which seems to carry over into the production version.

      So, let's say that hypothetically, you are a hotshot computer wiz. Waltz down to the local CompUSA to purchase a new iBook. That might take an hour. Catch the Hello, Bienvenidos, spin through the registration process, where you get asked four times if you are ready to use the internet, get scolded for not being ready for the internet, and even if you are not ready for the internet can you please hook up to a telephone line so we can connect you to the apple directly so we can register you.

      Wait on fed-ex to deliver your keyspan, or in your case, since you had it and the install disk with you, you install it and get it configured for the Internet.

      But all this time, you have a client that has been waiting on you for something like three hours, while his 2 million dollar sun server farm is sitting idle because you forgot your laptop at home but remembered to bring your keyspan with install disk.

      How heroic of you to run to the store to get the tools that you should have brought with you anyway. You are proud of this? So, are you getting paid or are you getting sued for his downtime?

      Master mechanics carry their own tools. Union carpenters bring their tools to the jobsite. I always have my old laptop in the trunk of my car, currently an MP3 player, but easy to use as a file server to rescue someone's data when their computer dies. It has a serial port built in. I also have a 1400 with newertechnology G3 upgrade in a bag with cds burnt with every utility including drivers for every brand and make of printer/scanner/camera/usb key/external drive/complete set of every update you can get through mac software update and windows update, all the software I ever use while working. I also carry perfect disk images of 7.6 on zip with scsi drive, 8.1, 8.6, 9.0, 9.0.4, 9.1, 9.2 and 10.1 and my latest creation, a micro ATX fileserver with two 80 gb drives mirrored and partitioned with perfect ghost images of the four PC configurations used on my network. In a box in my trunk I also carry an HP wirescope, Punch down with 110 blade, a box of running spares of commonly broken or needed items like CD drives, memory, nubus/ISA/PCI NICs, Phonenet modules and terminating resisters, Mice, mice balls, patch cables, and a ancient analog VGA 640 by 480 flatpanel, because I do not want to lug a monitor to use to troubleshoot a black screen.

      Fully rebuilding any system on or off my network takes me about 5 minutes of my attention, go do something else for a while, then come back for 10 minutes to complete individual configurations and replace the users data back onto the computer.

      You were out buying a glossy new iBook while he had 1000 people Idle at their desks for three hours. Let's say they were $10/hr cube proles. He lost $30,000 plus Three hours of pissed off help desk people lying to customers about the network being down, while you were "out shopping"

      If I have to spend more than 4 hours a YEAR on any one desktop to get it up and running and maintain it, I am behind schedule.

      I would never hire you to do a damn thing for me. Because you are more unprofessional than anyone I have ever worked with in IT. Since you would quickly develop a reputation in the industry for shoddy work, you would not be hired by anyone.

      So again, lets say you are the genuine article. you are, by the nature of having recieved the DP3 (Developer Preview) release of OS X, biased in your opinion of OS X, because your job depends on it. You bet the ranch, or at least your professional life since feb 2000 (that is closer to the correct release date of DP3) on OS X being successfull. We can discount your opinion for obvious bias. But I really think you downloaded it on daddy's cable modem from some annonymous ftp.

      I do not think you are a Net Admin or Developer of any stripe. I think you are a 13 year old mac fanboy that got caught in a fabrication.

      Go ahead and dig yourself deeper. I am waiting with baited breath for your next stunningly obtuse comment.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  4. Not yet mastered. by guamman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All the advances are good and fine, but the increase in the iMac category may really hurt. I realize that the increase in necessary becuase of the increased costs, but the iMac is what makes Macinctosh a viable comeptitor. The G4 and soon to be G5 towers are excellent, but only cover a very small demographic and their high cost makes them prohibitive. The lower cost iMac can go head to head with most PCs and in some cases, offer a better value. While I agree that the high end computers are more fun and interesting (from a marketing/sales perspective). The lower cost machines are what is going to make money. Something that I believe Apple is still desprately in need of. It may be a smarter move to swallow the increased costs for the time being and attempt to move more volume.

    1. Re:Not yet mastered. by Publicus · · Score: 3, Informative

      While I agree that the high end computers are more fun and interesting (from a marketing/sales perspective). The lower cost machines are what is going to make money.

      Not sure I agree with you. While I may be wrong, the G4 towers probably make more money for Apple (per unit) than anything. I doubt if they make much of anything on the iMac. It's probably just more of a maintaining market share thing, keeping it a viable platform so software gets released for Macs.

      I could be totally wrong, I haven't looked at any numbers, but my gut tells me that the $3500 dual processor G4 tower and the Cinema Display carries a much larger margin for Apple. Not sure how the total sales of these units factors in.

      Oh well... I can't afford any of it. I wish I could.

      --

      My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

    2. Re:Not yet mastered. by blonde+rser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The lower cost machines are what is going to make money. Something that I believe Apple is still desprately in need of.

      Exactly what aapl are you looking at. Apple may not hold the record for market share but when it comes to making a profit Apple holds her own. One of the great things about Apple is they have so much in the bank that they can afford to take a risk here and there. The reason the price went up: their research suggests people will pay more. This is not a desperate act. And I doubt anybody in the market will interpret this as a desperate act either.

    3. Re:Not yet mastered. by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the margin on the iMac is 20%, and the margin on the high-end Tower is 30%. They all have to sell pretty well for Apple to make its profit targets.

      I think these price increases was so they could maintain the 20% margin. Otherwise their shareholders get pretty upset.

      I'm not sure what the margin on the new Cinema Display is, but the only people who will buy it are seriously rich hobbyists and seriously professional graphic artists and motion graphics/video editing people. That's a rich audience, but the whole market for that thing is a few thousand people.

      At least they undercut Sun, who is charging $4,500 (versus $3,500) for what looks like almost the same thing.

      Sun beat them to market, though.

      D

    4. Re:Not yet mastered. by revscat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Consoles have better specifications. Apples are toys.

      You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Numbers do not tell the whole story.

      I am a Java developer who has been looking for years for the perfect development environment from which to work on. Since I got my G4 I have without a doubt never been happier. I don't have to fuck with endless config files like I did on Linux, and yet I can use all the *nix tools I got used to. Windows made me want to choke: it was functional, but I prefer not to deal with Microsoft products if I can help it. Compared to OS X it is *Windows* that is the toy.

      My G4 has helped me to do my job better. I can assure you it is *not* a toy, at least no more or less so than any other general purpose PC.

    5. Re:Not yet mastered. by shawnce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ATA66 - Why would you need a faster bus when the system has ONE harddrive. No consumer grade harddrive can saturate ATA66. So why put in something that costs a little more for no benefit to the end user.

      PC100 - The G4 used in the systems FSB doesn't gain much from going higher (PC133 gives only a slight increase). So again why up the price for little gain.

      Stereo sound - Umm... Mac OS X supports multi-channel sound. You can buy surround sound systems that connect via USB. Again why up the price for something that most consumers wouldn't need.

      15 LCD display... yup that is so last month. Few system have been shipping with 15 LCD by default until recently.

      GeForce2 MX - It only driving a 15" LCD and does it well enough for game play. Sure you don't get 120+ FPS but my eyes don't scan that fast what about yours? Also I don't think that the LCD screen can update that quickly anyways. So again why add the cost...

      I guess I should sell my TV, stereo system, DVD player because the tech started shipping more then two years ago.

      Basically many hardware vendors attempt to up the numbers on things when on the whole it doesn't gain much for the system. It is the difference between competing based on the numbers as opposed to the product/solution.

  5. Is there a list somewhere... by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 2

    of all the different MacWorlds? There sure do seem to be a lot of them... A schedule, perhaps? It would be nice.

    --
    Everything is mainstream now.
    1. Re:Is there a list somewhere... by rehannan · · Score: 3, Informative
  6. the prices goes UP? by jchristopher · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Apple is the only company that RAISES prices as time goes by. How can they possibly justify $100 for an extra 5 gigs of storage?

    More importantly, who is buying these things?!?

    Wouldn't a more rational plan be to drop the iPod to $299 and sell this new version for $399? (which is what it's going for now)

    $500 seems like an AWFUL lot of money for a product with a 90 day warranty.

    1. Re:the prices goes UP? by k_187 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      because the hard drives that are in the iPods are insanely expensive. The 5gig HD that's in the low end model would cost you $400. With the iPod you're getting the HD and the mp3 playing stuff. You're not going to find apple selling these things for less than they can get the HDs for.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:the prices goes UP? by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, thankfully, the free market sets the price just fine. Some people find great value in a good interface and a product backed by a company that has surprising amounts of reboundability.

      I personally would not pay $500 for this device, but since its selling, many people will. Why question it, you either can't afford it, or don't see value in that product for that price. If you want it cheaper, asking Apple won't hurt though...

    3. Re:the prices goes UP? by jchristopher · · Score: 2
      because the hard drives that are in the iPods are insanely expensive. The 5gig HD that's in the low end model would cost you $400.

      Oh really? Here's a link to the Smardisk Firefly, a small portable drive with the same mechanism. It sells for $199, and you can be sure Apple is getting them for way less than that in bulk.

    4. Re:the prices goes UP? by dhovis · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That $400 price for the iPod HD was true when the iPod first came out, but the price has come down quite a bit. You can get a 5GB firewire drive based on that HD for as little as $170. Check out this article at dealmac.com.

      The real reason the 5GB iPod is still $400 is that people are still buying it. If Apple was having trouble selling them, the price would have dropped to $350 or $300. They are still hot, and there is still no comparable MP3 player on the market, period. Size, capacity, battery life, and firewire. No other MP3 player matches the iPod in all 4 of those categories. Until one does, Apple can charge what they damn well please. That is the free market at work.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    5. Re:the prices goes UP? by Graymalkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is it with the Wintel retard demographic on slashdot. "How could this thing possibly cost money when I can find supposedly equivilent parts for much cheaper!" The iPod uses a firewire port, have you ever seen a cheap firewire controller worth buying? I haven't heard of any. It's also got one smooth looking screen with a pretty low dot pitch for a monochrome LCD. The battery isn't exactly some shit Energizer or Duracell. I also can't believe you said Apple is the only company to raise prices as time goes by. How much was RAM going for last spring and how much is it going for right now? It certainly isn't any fucking cheaper.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    6. Re:the prices goes UP? by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      While the 22" display is indeed hugnormous the resolution isn't really much to write home about. I can display stuff side by side just like on a bigass Cinema display. While the screen itself is a giant the resolution didn't give you THAT much more space than a much cheaper 21" CRT. The 23" I think is a solution to the resolution problem. Now if they would just make 200 dpi flat screens like IBM made for LLNL that'd be really badass.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    7. Re:the prices goes UP? by tonywong · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that's a 2.5" drive wrapped in a simple case. The iPod uses a PC Card sized HD which costs significantly more.

    8. Re:the prices goes UP? by k_187 · · Score: 2

      yeah, the iPod uses a 1.8" drive that only toshiba makes.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    9. Re:the prices goes UP? by mstrjon32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You also must remember that the iPod does not use standard 2.5" HDD's, but rather Toshiba's 1.8" creation; which happens to be *very* expensive. So don't compare those cheap Firewire HDD's to the iPod. The 1.8" keeps the iPod as small as it is..for an HDD player anyway.

    10. Re:the prices goes UP? by dhovis · · Score: 2

      You did't read my post, did you? The price I quoted was for a firewire hard drive with the exact same 5GB 1.8" Toshiba drive as the iPod. $170 is expensive for a 5GB firewire HD.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

  7. One more thing... by S-prime · · Score: 4, Informative

    iTunes 2.04 was also (quietly) released, nothing new here except better stability.

    Also, the Bluetooth update won't be avaliable for download till April (this from Apple's site).

    --
    -- Your local friendly mad scientist-in-training
    1. Re:One more thing... by rehannan · · Score: 2
      Offtopic rant: I now officially hate IE for OS X. Apparently the Esc key clears a text boxes, which just happened as I finished typing this the first time around (vi habit). Arrg.

      IE does that in windows too. Did you also notice that :wq doesn't work in MS Word?

    2. Re:One more thing... by phaze3000 · · Score: 2
      I'll just point out that Dell's bottom of the line systems run Windows/Linux FAST. Whereas with Apple "oh, shouldn't have bought that, you really need the top of the line to make OS X fast".

      Bullshit, try running Win XP or Linux+Gnome+Nautlius on a bottom of the line PC and you'll find it's a similar speed to an iBook with Mac OS X.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  8. Re:MacWorld Tokyo by frinkster · · Score: 2

    There is a small amount of infoon the Apple website.

  9. iMac prices up $100 by Van+Halen · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apple also announced a $100 price increase on all three iMacs. I guess their profit margin couldn't quite absorb the increase in LCD and memory prices lately.

    Also, The Mac Observer has a nice blow by blow of Steve's keynote.

    Otherwise, cool stuff!

    1. Re:iMac prices up $100 by asv108 · · Score: 2
      From the article:

      "Rapidly increasing component costs is an industry-wide issue right now. Since the new iMac's launch in January, memory costs have tripled and flat-panel costs have increased twenty-five percent, with little relief in sight,"

      I know memory prices have increased a little but tripled? I guess Apple can't just come out and say "We priced the new iMac too low so in order to obtain maximum profitability we are going to raise the price"

    2. Re:iMac prices up $100 by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Look on the bright side. Now, instead of early-adopters getting shafted by lowering prices, they're getting the bonus. $100 off an iMac, instead of, say, $100 on? That's $200 I'm glad to pocket.

      It's just too bad that this will hinder adoption, because this really is a great computer, even without all the awesome bells/whistles. This is what computing should be. Well... Maybe not exactly, but it's cute.

      --Dan

    3. Re:iMac prices up $100 by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      Yup, tripled. I picked up a 256MB stick for $40 (Canadian) about two weeks before Christmas. Now they're well over $100; the normal going price is about $120, which is triple.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  10. Bluetooth, iPod improvements. by zardie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's good to see that Apple's embracing the technology, giving it a greater chance of widespread adoption. Remember what Apple did for us with USB and Firewire?

    Now if only they had bluetooth support for the iPod, I'd be happy about not having to connect it up to the PC every time I wanted to transfer a file.

    Having played with an iPod before and found that the sound is a bit try, the EQ is a welcome addition and was the one thing that didn't convince me to buy one over a NetMD-based walkman. Contact management is just damn cool, evidence that Apple listens to the community out there (remember that iPod contact hack?). Good work, Apple :)

    1. Re:Bluetooth, iPod improvements. by juuri · · Score: 3

      Syncing music over bluetooth would be god awful slow. Do you really want to move up files at 70-100k a second?

      I guess if you had some sort of queing method in place to automatically upload files if you were near that would rock.

      The other thing no one seems to mention. Bluetooth seems to gobble a lot of power when running in discovery mode. Yes I know it isn't comparable to 802.11 but when it cuts the standby time on a phone from well over a week to a couple of days it is a pretty big hit.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
  11. Now I can get... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft Office AND Appleworks on the same iPod!
    http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,50688,00.ht ml

  12. custom laser engraving? by StevenHallman76 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Which iPod is yours?"

    "It's the one that says 'Bad Mother Fucker'"

  13. Re:More expensive Mac hardware by jimbolaya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're going to look awfully silly with that big ol' 40GB Maxtor hard drive on your hip as you go jogging. And I'll bet you'll feel silly, too, when you realize that the Maxtor can't play music on its own.

    --

    There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  14. Re:More expensive Mac hardware by Graymalkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well considering neither your standard MP3 player or USB 2.0 hard drive have a master bus controller or software, they can't talk to one another. You could carry both the MP3 player and hard drive around until you were blue in the face but you couldn't transfer any of the songs without a host system.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  15. Keynote Video? by pgpckt · · Score: 2

    Anyone know where I can see a copy of Jobs' keynote address?

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
  16. Re:No MacWorld Expo in Canada? by Polo · · Score: 2

    From what I've seen of the details of the levy, that only counts for blank media. If they delivered the iPod with music already on it, it would not be taxable. Of course, that could change.

  17. Re:More expensive Mac hardware by helixblue · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd just love to see you fit your Maxtor USB 2.0 HDD in your pocket, myself.

  18. Price Breaks for Students by PMAvers · · Score: 4, Informative

    A little tidbit for those college students/those with parents/friends in the education industry. Try going to the Education Apple Store, things are cheaper for 'ya.

    Example: 5 GB iPod: $369 (Normally $399)
    10 GB iPod: $469. (Normally $499)

    Hey, $30 off isn't too bad. Just trying to get the word out.

    1. Re:Price Breaks for Students by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 3, Funny

      A little tidbit for those college students/those with parents/friends in the education industry. Try going to the Education Apple Store, things are cheaper for 'ya.

      Example: 5 GB iPod: $369 (Normally $399)
      10 GB iPod: $469. (Normally $499)


      Not that I'm complaining (being in the education industry myself). It just makes me wonder, what possible academic value does an iPod have? If none, then what's the point of academic pricing again? Not that I'm complaining, mind you (me want bargain!)

    2. Re:Price Breaks for Students by bonzoesc · · Score: 2

      To get us poor starving college students on the Apple train. Most die-hard Mac-users I know started in uni.

    3. Re:Price Breaks for Students by GrBear · · Score: 4, Informative

      And just remember, if you live in Canada, come January 1st. 2003, you'll likely be paying an extra $210 GOV'T REGULATED MUSIC TAX ($21/gig) on that shiney new MP3 player. Arg!

      Guess I'm going to have to break down and buy one before xmas.

    4. Re:Price Breaks for Students by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative
      what possible academic value does an iPod have? If none, then what's the point of academic pricing again? Not that I'm complaining, mind you (me want bargain!)

      Music students typically carry around a load of CDs and DAT with current songs they are trying to learn, or pieces they are studying. Putting all of that on an iPod would make it easier (and is faster than transferring to tape or burning a CD). The iPod is also a 5 or 10 gig hard drive, which has similar academic value as a Zip drive.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  19. BlueTooth by pinkpineapple · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is big. If Apple is on the blue tooth train, then it means that the standard will be back from the dead when M$ put it by not supporting it in XP, and will become successfull (see USB for some background.) Apple is obviously working on new desktop and laptop systems with bluetooth integrated. It's not rumors but very certain that BT is what Apple need for their digital hub strategy. I wonder how they are going to cop with interference between BT and 802.11b. And it will be really funny to see how other vendors are playing catch up with Apple when they realize that bluetooth is a really neat solution to connect devices. In M$ interest not to connect easily with Palm, this is the only reason why the beast of Redmond killed the technology by not releasing drivers last summer. However, all the devices like PDAs (ex: iPaq, Loox, etc...) are released in Japan with BlueTooth in standard. Again, US is lagging big time behind Japan when it comes to wireless (3G, and now BlueTooth.)

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:BlueTooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It may be that Bluetooth and 802.11b (Airport) can coexist in the same frequency range (2.4GHz), but at the cost of reduced data rates/throughput. It is interesting that Apple offers Bluetooth as a USB dongle rather than have it built-in so at least there is some seperation between the Airport (802.11b) antenna which is built into the computer/laptop and the Bluetooth unit. Maybe Apple can build-in Bluetooth and have a more effective solution (less intereference) in the future if they ever update Airport from 802.11b to 802.11a which operates in a different frequency band of 5.8GHz.

    2. Re:BlueTooth by stripes · · Score: 3, Funny
      It is interesting that Apple offers Bluetooth as a USB dongle rather than have it built-in so at least there is some seperation between the Airport (802.11b) antenna which is built into the computer/laptop and the Bluetooth unit.

      Or maybe it is just that they figure people won't buy a whole new computer just to get it? I expect future Apple products will build the BT module in (unless there is basically zero demand).

      Well that and if you put a Blue Tooth antenna inside a TiBook I bet it has a range of about 3 inches :-)

    3. Re:BlueTooth by evilviper · · Score: 2
      this is the only reason why the beast of Redmond killed the technology by not releasing drivers last summer.

      Yeah. Microsoft's failure to include USB support in Windows 95 & Windows NT 4.0 really killed USB didn't it?

      I could think of a million other examples, but I imagine you could too so I'll leave it at that.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:BlueTooth by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2

      IIRC, Toshiba has been selling notebooks/laptops with BlueTooth support for over a year.

    5. Re:BlueTooth by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      I think you're quite right, and I too found this encouraging. You see, my tech dream device right now is a bluetooth living room remote control. Sure, it sounds stupid and frivolous and all that, and that's why I think Apple just might make one.

      The idea would be for Apple to make a set-top living room hub connected by either Firewire or fast ethernet to your computer. There would be inputs/outputs on the box for video and audio, which would play on your living room TV and stereo. Using the BT remote, you would basically have a living room interface to the content of your computer, and be able to play back your music and video files in your living room. (I also imagine the BT remote would double as a universal IR remote; basically, the living room hub would relay commands to other components in "bright" IR pulses.)

      The BT remote would basically log itself in to your main computer as a remote user, and have a rudimentary LCD filebrowser built in, giving you access to the contents of your hard drive. I imagine if you had the TV on, there would also be a more expansive interface to your computer (based on AppleTalk, maybe). And, of course, the thing would act as a PVR, but the files would shuttled through the interlink and saved on your hard drive, where you could later manipulate them with iMovie, recompress them, burn backups, or whatever. This means the box would have to do hardware compression (maybe into MPEG-4?) and also have enough numbercrunching power to play back compressed video from your HD, but neither of these features would be terribly expensive anymore.

      Anyway, I hope this is the sort of thing Jobs has in mind when he repeats the mantra that the Mac will be the digital hub of the home. This is the sort of digital hub that I would actually buy.

    6. Re:BlueTooth by evilviper · · Score: 2

      First I'd just like to say that I despise USB. It's a poor replacement for much better technologies.

      Secondly, Microsoft sits on their thumbs with any new technology until such time as it's gained enough momentum that it's in their interest to support it. And as my original post pointed out, that not a tactic to kill any particular technologies, it's just their mediocrity being taken out of context.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  20. Macworld Tokyo 2002 Info by Metrollica · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Macworld Conference and Expo/Tokyo 2002 website is here with information on the event and the exhibits.

    There is also a thread at Macrumors on the event.

    Those wanting to watch the keynote are out of luck because there are no plans to broadcast it this year, like they have done in the past.

    --



    --Metrollica
  21. mod +1 Insightful by Emugamer · · Score: 2

    I totally agree. Though I am not quite informed as you are as the reason for microsoft killing bluetooth Ive seen what sticking with plain old 11b is doing to the area (seattle). I mean its fun surfing through badly protected windows domains with wireless implementation in the middle of the night from your car with a couple of friends with laptops. But it gets old after around a month. Hear Hear to Apple! oh yeah and if any apple rep wants to buy my loyalty forever respond and offer me a 23" display.

  22. Some Good Articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maclegion.org has a few good articles about this stuff. Their best is on the new disply and is worth checking out.

  23. Alan Smithee??? by Nathdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Traditionally 'Alan Smithee' is the moniker taken on by a movie director when he is so ashamed of his work that he will not be associated with it by name.

    So it's a little worrying to see who they reference (via graphic) as the iPod project manager on the story link.

    :)

    1. Re:Alan Smithee??? by Tide · · Score: 2

      I like to use Alan Smithee or Leonard Shelby. They are good fictious names I can easily use on the web site. Sometimes we mix match each others names, anything to stay interesting but still below the radar. I'd be more woried what product Alan Smithee was the manager for. ;)

      Whats up with that 4 score... kharma whore! hehe :)

      --

      People think Microsoft is the answer. Microsoft is just the question, "No" is the answer.
  24. Levies apply only to blank iPods by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Imagine the new iPod announcement there: US$599 gets you a 0-gig iPod, a $100 expense voucher for driving to the US border, and a $100 budget to buy a 10-gig drive there.

    The proposed CA$21/GB levy applies only to recording devices on which no sounds have ever been fixed. Apple could just cut a deal with Vivendi to put an MP3.com sampler on each unit before shipping it.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  25. Did Apple steal it? by batobin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm curious as to how Apple got their brand new "Contacts feature" seen here. It seems to me that two other people beat apple to the punch. iPod Organizer and ipoAddress.

    I'm curious as to whether Apple went to the developers, and bought the idea/software. I know they did this for SoundJam, in order to get iTunes. They literally bought out every SoundJam developer, and took the software.

    I also know this is how the "time in the title bar" idea got started. 3rd party software, bought by Apple. Any facts surrounding this acquisition?

    1. Re:Did Apple steal it? by dgoodman · · Score: 2

      before those two software packages came out, people had been doing this by hand anyway. Those two developers just took an idea more or less in the public domain and wrote software to make it easier. Apple simply added in the functionality people had been hacking into the iPod on their own to begin with...

    2. Re:Did Apple steal it? by dhovis · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't think Apple bought anything. They may have noticed that the people who had come up with ways to encode contact info into MP3 ID3 tags were getting a lot of attention.

      From what I can tell, this upgrade lets the iPod recognize the vCard format and puts a visible folder on the iPod called "Contacts". Any vCards in that folder show up in the "Contacts" menu on the iPod. Simple as that, and much simpler than turning your contacts into silent MP3s.

      The iPod apparantly has a pretty nifty OS with 2 ARM processors and 32MB of flash in it. It is probably capable of a lot of things (OGG support, perhaps). Don't expect Apple to come out with a dev kit for it anytime soon, though. I'm sure Apple does not want to have to support 3rd party software, and I think it is unlikely anybody would create a "killer app" for the iPod, other than the "killer app" that it already has. Most likely you would only see a few games.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    3. Re:Did Apple steal it? by batobin · · Score: 2, Informative

      To reply to my own original post:

      I did some research, and it turns out Apple implimented the contact feature much better than anyone else has previously. The other poster was correct to say that it now runs off of vCards. Very cool.

      Also, to reply to what someone else said. The new iPods (and all the old ones updated by the new iPod firmware) can indeed support Ogg Vorbis. Very cool!

    4. Re:Did Apple steal it? by KFury · · Score: 2

      "They literally bought out every SoundJam developer, and took the software."

      Actually, there was only one SoundJam developer, Jeff Robbins, and though he's a prolific software developer for C&G (Conflict Catcher, etc) he's also an Apple OS engineer and has been for more than six years.

      Casady & Greene has a tight relationship with Apple, and you can be sure that Apple made the buyout (or licensing) worth their while.

  26. Re:Clie sync? by moof1138 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a beta that has been out since late December, Apple even has a page dedicated to it:

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/applications/palm/

    The release notes for Palm Desktop for Mac OS X said the Clie was supported, and I can synch my Handspring via USB just fine. There are also a lot of conduits available or in progress on the page.

    --

    Hyperbole is the worst thing ever.
  27. Re:PC vs. Mac by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Although no one believes that the iMac price increase is due to manufacturing costs..."

    I do. The LCD production has not kept up with the demand (because people love the iMac, you see), so the manufacturer raised the cost of the LCDs. Ergo, price of iMac went up.

    It's not exactly a secret.

    The price will go down eventually, when supply meets demand. It happened with LCD displays for cell phones a few years back.

  28. I'll tell you what I would really like on an iPod by thesolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Offtopic, I know, but I would really like to see SHN (shorten) file support. Sure, you could transfer them on there, but I would like to see the iPod actually play them.

    Mp3s are just too lossy for my liking. I could still fit a few losslessly compressed albums on a 5 or 10 gig iPod, which is fine by me! Anything to keep from bringing a battery-draining CD player and loads of discs.

    Anyone know if that kind of hack is even possible? If it was, I'd buy one in a second.

  29. regarding price increases by BigBir3d · · Score: 2, Informative

    the price of memory went up for the iBook's too. it was $300 for the 512MB upgrade, it is now $400, well that's what it was when it went up nearly 2 weeks ago. the salesperson actually told me to not waste my money on "Apple memory" and do what she did, buy it online! (course i saved myself even more...)

  30. Re:C# by Eccles · · Score: 2

    I was waiting for someone to outdo the 22" Cinema Display, funny it was Apple that ended up doing it themselves.

    ViewSonic has had a 23" 1600x1200 LCD out for a few months now for ~$3500, so Apple was bested slightly already. (Even now, the Viewsonic has a larger screen -- 23" widescreen isn't as big as 23" 4:3 -- but the Apple is higher-res.)

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  31. D'ohhh - Correct URL! by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 2
    D'ohhhh!

    Try here instead.

  32. Re:I'll tell you what I would really like on an iP by asv108 · · Score: 2

    I love the SHN format for downloading shows of etree or Furthur but as a portable device format it doesn't stand a chance because the filesize is just way too large and there are no SHN chip decoders in existance. What I would really like to see is a lossless format that reduces file size even further. Shorten is basically abandonware that has been adopted by a niche.

  33. Re:PC vs. Mac by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, exactly the same thing has happened in the Mac world over the last few months. For instance, the high end PowerMac G4/dual 800 was $3,499, while its dual 1ghz replacement is $2,999. The PowerBook G4/667 was $ 3,500 when it was first released; now it's $2,999.

    The new iMac is only a little more expensive than previous iMac price points, but you're getting tons more for your money.

    D

  34. Price Breaks for Everybody!!! by dhovis · · Score: 3, Informative
    Even better:

    5GB iPod (refurbished) for $339 from store.apple.com (Click on "Special Deals"). Comes with the same 90 day warranty as a new iPod.

    --

    --
    The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

  35. RAM pricing by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I hadn't looked at the DRAM industry in a while, and was surprised to see what's happening. Back in the 1980s, the Asian countries took the DRAM business away from the US, and Intel exited the DRAM business.

    Things have changed. Micron (Boise, Idaho) is taking over the industry. They bought Toshiba's DRAM business, they bought TI's business, they bought KMT's business, and are negotiating to buy Hynex, which is in trouble. They and Samsung are in a race for the #1 spot now; if the the Hynex deal goes through, Micron will be far bigger than Samsung in DRAM.

    In 2001, there was a huge DRAM glut, which pushed prices down. Micron, instead of cutting back, used its advantage as the lowest-cost producer to squeeze out the weaker players. Here's an overview of the industry.

    It looks like that when the dust settles, Micron will have about 40% market share, Samsung (S. Korea) about 22%, Elpdata (Japan) somewhere under 20%, and minor players the rest. The era of brutal competition in DRAM may be ending. The number of players is much smaller now. We may see more "stability" in DRAM pricing.

  36. Re:Apple Needs to Re-Design all Laptop Motherboard by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't be easier just to redesign Unix users?

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  37. Get The Missing Sync by sfgoth · · Score: 2

    Mac OS Support for Sony CLIE handhelds. Version 2.2, now shipping, adds support for the new CLIE PEG-S360. HotSync your Sony handheld with any USB equipped Mac and your Sony handheld USB cradle or cable.


    http://www.markspace.com/missingsync.html
  38. iPod will play uncompressed AIFF files by sfgoth · · Score: 3, Informative

    No lossless compression, but you can still store several 600MB CDs of audio.

    iPod specs

    -pmb

  39. Perceived value of "overpriced apples" by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Insightful
    One thing I've never understood about the PC-Mac price comparison is this: Ten years ago, $4,000 bought you the computer you really dreamed of, the one that could do "everything". of course, "everything" didn't include high-end digital photography, digital moviemaking, ripping MP3s, or playing the kind of immersive 3D games that are available now.

    $2,000 got you the machine you could afford -the one that you could use Office and Quicken on, play most middle-of the road games, and if you were willing to wait a long time, dabble in graphic design and multimedia.

    Now the machine you really want still costs $4,000, but the machine you can afford is down to $1,500, and it does far more than even the best home computers did just two or three years ago.

    The fact that there are $500 commodity PC boxes available is nice, but does that mean that the $1,500 iMac no longer has value to the person who purchases it?

    It seems to me that rather than comparing the prices of PC and Mac CPUs and peripherals, we ought to be comparing overall value to the consumer - i.e., is this machine doing everything I want it to do, for a price that I find worthwhile?

    If you love your Mac, but you don't love PCs, there must be more perceived value in the Mac for you. If that's the case, isn't it intrinsically worth more to you than a less expensive PC?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Perceived value of "overpriced apples" by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Oh my! they might break a nail!

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  40. Re:More expensive Mac hardware by sfgoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Before you Apple fans begin to flame me: I once had an apple. It was my favorite computer of all time. I miss it. I just can't afford a Mac.

    And how much do you value your time?

    I'm amazed at how many people will "save" themselves a few hundred bucks when buying a PC, only to waste months of their own time and effort on keeping it working.

    But then again, those $400 MSN "rebates" were a bit hit too. Suckers.

    -pmb

  41. Music students that need to listen to music... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My fiancee is studying music in school, and she has to listen to a rediculous amount of music. One of the reasons she got a laptop was to be able to rip the CDs in the library so she wouldn't have to fight for access to them with others in the classes.

    Now when she gets new listening assignments, she hops into the library, rips the CDs, syncs the iPod, and she's set. If she really likes the music, she makes a copy of the CD to go in the CD Jukebox in our apartment so she can listen to the higher quality recording.

    Now she doesn't mind the 30-45 minute subway rides that she does getting around town because she just turns on her iPod and the music is waitting for her.

    Could this be done with non-Apple equipment, sure. However, the two hours of helping her adjust from being a Windows user to a Mac user made up for it from reduced tech support on my end... As I type away on my Windows machine whose copy of Internet Explorer couldn't use view source last week...

    Alex

  42. What's on my mind is... by Stenpas · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's been six months since the last major MacOS X update, and as Steve has said, we should be done with the transition to MacOS X this upcoming March 24th. So where's the update that makes the rest of the transition possible? It's not good enough in its current form.

    Newer ipods and bigger cinema displays are great, but MacOS X is vastly more important. Guess the transition period needs to be lengthened now.

    1. Re:What's on my mind is... by Ford+Fulkerson · · Score: 4, Informative
      Guess the transition period needs to be lengthened now.

      The transition was completed at MacWorld in January when all Macs started shipping with Mac OS X as default. What else is needed to complete the transition?

      --

      Somewhere in the heavens... they are waiting.
  43. Re:over priced apples by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    $500 ipods, $600 15" LCD displays, does apple only cater to the super rich?

    $24 t-shirts, $50 jeans, does Abercrombie & Fitch only cater to the super rich?

    Yes. Take your broke ass to American Eagle (Dell).

    You either get it or you don't. You either "get" paying more for the end-to-end experience, or you buy some cheap knockoff down the way. You may have something similar, but you don't have the original, nor will it ever be the original, nor will all the complaining that the original costs more, or your knockoff performs the same function make your cheap knockoff the original.

    Get over it.

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  44. Good Apple spin lately by Gaetano · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems to have been alot of really positive (overall) articles on apple and their products lately.

    I used to be a Mac slammer. Nothing made me quite as happy as slamming indignant Mac die hards, unless it was slamming brainless Microsoft Bots. That was before Steve Jobs came back to apple. Then I started watching them with interest.

    Now, after all these good stories lately, about the ipod, imovies, OS X and its unix environment, I have to say someone slipped me some of the Mac coolaide.

    I want one! I want one now! Damn! And I'm happy about it too!

    Gimme a mac!

  45. Re:who cares about contacts - use vcf by confu2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can use VCF files to make todo lists/display random text data.

    And it's a heck of a lot easier and more elegant than setting up mp3 tags.

    begin:vcard
    version:3.0
    fn:To Do List
    title:1) Write Perl Script\n2) Write .vcf file\n3) Copy to contacts folder on iPod
    end:vcard

    Voila.

  46. Feed Forward? by mojo-raisin · · Score: 2

    I wonder if this new Apple display will be the first to incorporate Mitsubishi's Feed Forward Display Technology. Then we'd finally be able to watch full motion video and play QuakeIII on our LCD Displays - and I'd actually consider owning one.

  47. All You need is... by BlackGriffen · · Score: 2

    the ability to deal with an HFS+ firewire hard drive, right? That's all the iPod is, really, that and some software to play the tunes on it.

    BlackGriffen

  48. Re:23" Cinema Display is not the largest available by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2

    Sun patented ugly design too I can tell. At least and not like Apple, Sun can rest assured that one will copy their design. Plain Fugly!

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
  49. Re:I'll tell you what I would really like on an iP by mojo-raisin · · Score: 2

    Even better would be flac support which is LGPL'd, supports ID3 tags and works very well.

  50. Every iPod has custom engraving already by KFury · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check the back of your iPod. Under the edched logo you'll find your iPod's serial number etched in as well, and it matches the serila # you'll find in 'settings'.

    Kinda cool, kinda unnoticed.

  51. Re:get real by Perdo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the difference is, I own a Mitsubishi 22" DP2040u. The SGI sucks 27 watts, the DP2040u sucks 155 watts. Used 16 hours a day, 31 days a month, results in a 12 dollar electric bill. Including the $75 recycle fee, I can run my monitor for 10 years before my total cost of ownership exceeds the SGI. $1500 invested instead of spent on a flat panel makes the CRT pay for itself relative to the flat panel in the same timeframe. I still have an 8 year old 21" HM-4520-D. I know the life expectancy of a CRT. The apple cinema display has a life expectancy of 15000 hours. That is less than TWO YEARS. 6 years peak with conservative use.

    So, with 1/3 the life expectancy, Buying THREE for every one CRT, Where are your cost of ownership numbers now?

    You do not own a cinema display. You have absolutly no idea what it costs to own one.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  52. AirPort vs Bluetooth by maggard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    802.11b & Bluetooth have one problem - they conflict. So do 2.4 GHz cordless phones and microwave ovens for that matter. Indeed some folks are finding old 900 MHz cordless phones and baby monitors to be more reliable then the increasingly trafficked 2.4 GHz Industrial-Scientific-Medical bands.

    So, with Apple leading the renaissance in wireless networking (it was their introduction of the AirPort that kicked of this current wave of activity) how will they reconcile this with Bluetooth? All of their computers ship with wireless card slots and built-in antennas; they all also ship with USB ports (also popularized by Apple.) Which is to drown out the other? While it's true that they can co-exist it is at the expense of greatly reduced data rates, already an issue for folks used to 100 Mbps or 1,000 Mbps (standard on many Mac models) Ethernet.

    My own bet is that before or along-with any USB-BlueTooth product introduction Apple will ship a revised AirPort, or at least a software tweak with a built in Bluetooth-friendly autonegotiation. Or, failing that we'll see the release of an AirPort II featuring 802.11a (at 5 GHz and capable of 54 Mbps) thus safely different from cordless phones, microwave ovens, baby monitors, 802.11b, 802.11g, Bluetooth, HomeRF, and a half dozen other wireless applications.

    As to microwave ovens - well 2.4 Ghz is the resonant frequency of water so no change possible there. However it is something to think about as you hold these various new wireless devices up next to your body.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:AirPort vs Bluetooth by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'm pretty sure I read a series of reviews that said that wasn't a problem, and they had both bluetooth and Wireless LANs going at full speed with almost no problems. Remember Bluetooth is based on frequency hopping with clever bits - I think they manage to avoid each other pretty well

    2. Re:AirPort vs Bluetooth by mccalli · · Score: 2
      802.11b & Bluetooth have one problem - they conflict. So do 2.4 GHz cordless phones and microwave ovens for that matter.

      I keep hearing this. I have two microwave ovens, a cordless DECT digital phone with two handsets, and I run a wireless 802.11b network.

      No problems at all. So how come I'm getting away with it?

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:AirPort vs Bluetooth by Dorf_of_Eleven · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've just finished playing with loads of Bluetooth gadgets - a CompactFlash Card for my PocketPC, a module for my cell phone, a PCMCIA card for my laptop, and a Bluetooth printer. All performed flawlessly, beyond my expectations.

      Any effect on my 802.11b? Nope, nodda. Why? Because I'm one guy, and I'd need to push myself to use both networks to their limits at the same time. Perhaps the Bluetooth-802.11b interaction makes a difference at an office, but really... if it's that big o' thing, tell the Bluetooth guy to go stand in the corner (out of range) :)

      --
      WhatEVA
  53. proof of concept by seanw · · Score: 3, Funny
  54. Re:Bluetooth and keyboards/mice? by glwtta · · Score: 2

    A wireless keyboard that you have to plug in. Why, that's brilliant!

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  55. Re:cheap bastard by pelorus · · Score: 2, Funny
    "European cars have the WORST track record in terms of repair frequency and costs..."


    The ones we sell to yankee doodle suckers do, yeah...

  56. mod -1 Cruel by kubrick · · Score: 2

    Hey, how would you like a 23" display?
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Nah, just kidding :)

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  57. Re:I'll tell you what I would really like on an iP by Baki · · Score: 2

    If you store uncompressed albums, your iPOD will also be battery-draining.

    These HDD based MP3 players usually spin the HDD once in a few minutes to buffer something like 5 minutes into RAM. Using uncompressed sound, your HDD will be continuously running, shortening the battery life a lot.

  58. A little more on the iPod 1.1 update: by clemens · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. It can correctly display some previous undisplayable Chinese characters now, which is a great saving: a very common character that is used in Chinese names can now been seen. It was such an eye-sore!

    2. There used to be a track in my iPod that would freeze up the machine. Now the problem is gone.

    Good job, Apple!

    --
    This is the funniest signature I could ever think of.
  59. Re:over priced apples by gunnk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This may come as a bit of a surprise, but Apple hardware just isn't that expensive for what you get. It's just that you tend to get a really well-balanced, complete system. Most "bargain-box" PC's are crippled by poor system design. In terms of day-to-day performance, it's hard for me to tell my Dell Optiplex GX240 (1.7 GHz P4) from my custom-built 800MHz P3 at home. Our department got the Dell really cheaply, though, so I can't complain about the relatively poor performance.

    To fairly evaluate the price Apple is charging, why not compare more equivalent hardware? I priced out a IBM ThinkPad T23 vs. an Apple PowerBook a few days ago. The high end T23 sports a 1.2 GHz Pentium THREE processor, 256MB RAM, 60GB HDD, 14.1 inch display,10/100 Mb networking, and 16MB video RAM. The cost on IBM's web store is $3,599.00
    The high end Apple PowerBook "ultimate" model has a 667 MHz G4 processor, 1 GB of RAM, 48 GB HDD, 16 MB video RAM, Gigabit networking, wireless networking and a 15.2 inch display). It retails for $3,699.00.
    Feature-wise, my personal opinion is that the PowerBook is more "loaded" than the ThinkPad. However, the cost difference between the two is less than 3%.
    Looks to me like the Apple price is very competitive.

    Likewise, if you look at the extra $100 Apple announced as an increase in the price of iMacs, you still get a great system for the cost. Sure, you can find "cheapo" PC boxes for less, but you get less computer as well. Apple doesn't market "discount" computers. Just because the iMac is the lowest end system Apple makes you shouldn't compare it to the lowest end PC available. The two are in different classes. Compare the iMac to a comparably-built PC and I think you'll find that Apple's prices remain quite attractive.

    --
    Life is short: void the warranty.
  60. Macs & Medication by maggard · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    Congrats - you put together a Frankenstein.

    See one in a store? No. Going to see one in a store? No.

    First off Apple generally uses pretty high quality components. Their LCD is a sight nicer then your $300 closeout special. Apple also integrates everything a hell of a lot better. Of course that's a lot easier when the OS comes from the same vendor (where's yours?) Indeed right there is half of the value of the machine, it runs MacOS X. And of course the included applications, not shovelware but good stuff that works with the hardware and works intuitively.

    Of course there's also the point of the screen being on a pedestal. That's unique in the industry and totally rocks - it's amazing how seductive it is to have a display one can casually reach out & reposition, tilt, angle. It really does change the experience and some panel-on-pegs is not the same at all.

    Then there's that whole service & support thing. You may disdain it but the iMac is the intro level computer and ask any real vendor - it costs, it costs a lot to support folks. Phones, websites, repairs, parts, trained folks, etc. You may be willing to spend half a day getting your CD burner to work; most folks just want one that works and if it doesn't a number to call and a quick & easy resolution path.

    Am I a Macolyte? No. I have a few, and yeah the mac.com address (free, stable, fast, offers POP, IMAP, SMTP, WebDAV, HTTP, no adverts, can't beat that) but I've also a room full of PCs. Which do I recommend to folks? Depends on what they want to do and how they like to work.

    For some things Macs are spot on, for others PCs are a better choice. Macs are price competitive (your apples-to-oranges comparison notwithstanding) as one long as one avoids the Apple memory. The iMac is a great intro or home machine, trivial to set up and fast enough. I also find the laptops to be good deals with rugged cases & long battery life. The G4s are fine machines though they do cost the dickens but if ya need them there they are. Depending on your business a Mac might or might not be appropriate, certainly in some fields a Wintel box is a much better choice, others a Mac fits the bill.

    But you, you seem to have a chip on your shoulder. Fine. But don't go making stupid statements and not expect to get called on them. Nor come looking for an argument or to act out your frustrations at whatever. We've both had our say and at this point any further discussion would be almost like baiting those foamers one sometimes finds on streetcorners - just inane & embarrassing for all around.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  61. Re:Apple Needs to Re-Design all Laptop Motherboard by rthille · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not entirely true. My Powerbook G3 running OS-X has the control key in the right place, as well as the control key on the bottom next between 'fn' and 'option'. I'm an old NeXT guy, so there was no way I was putting up with OpenStep 5x with the control key in the wrong place.

    It wasn't that hard to do. If you are interested, let me know.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  62. Re:Why the added vCard support? by William+R.+Dickson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I could mount a railgun to a toaster, you can bet I would. You can't have too many railguns.

  63. YMMV by maggard · · Score: 2
    Get a clue: they don't conflict

    Well thank you for your helpful and informative posting. I've no doubt it will be well appreciated by those folks who haven't had your fortunate experience.

    I've had any number of friends and clients report problems, particularly those in device-rich environments like offices. Indeed one recently had to decide between their new Siemens 4200-series 2.4 GHz consumer phone system I'd recommended and their WiFi base station just brought in as part of another project. The same is true for the customer who watched his presentation go down in flames when a bevy of Bluetooth devices in the room slowed the 802.11b link he was on down to uselessness.

    No doubt the authors of numerous articles on this exact topic (see Google) will also be cheered to hear that you've exhaustively researched & tested this and determined their own results are in fact wrong.

    Where would we all be without your support and cheerful insight?

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  64. Forgive me, for I have sinned by Van+Halen · · Score: 2
    Thanks to everyone who's pointed out what a complete moron I am. I wouldn't have figured it out otherwise! And I even screwed up that one... (idiot)

    I did, in fact, read all of the links in the story except the MacCentral one. I had submitted a story on all this just a minute or so after the guy that got it did, so I thought I'd add the little tidbit that I didn't see in his submission. I was wrong. Can slashdot ever forgive me?

    As I said, moderators, please mod me down to -1 (I'm posting this at +2 for maximum karma damage) and if you find it in your hearts to do so, moderate all of my recent posts down as well. Thank you.

  65. IHBT (nt) by damiam · · Score: 2


    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  66. Re:More expensive Mac hardware by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Sucker? I think not. I was in california, and they way they intially worded it, you got 400 dollars worth of stuff at best buy, you agreed to a long term agreement, which is illegal to do in Cailifornia, rendering the contract null.
    Basically, I got 400 dollars worth of stuff free.twice.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  67. Re:Apple Needs to Re-Design all Laptop Motherboard by robertchin · · Score: 2

    Same thing with my powerbook G4, although the caps lock light still toggles on and off when technically it's acting as a control key. Go figure.

  68. Watching E-Bay... by jcr · · Score: 2

    I'm just waiting for the flood of people cashing in their 22" Cinema Displays to buy a 23" Cinema Display HD...

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  69. Re:over priced apples by mr100percent · · Score: 2

    the /. crowd is not the target for an iPod.

    There is a reason stores like Old Navy and the Gap make a ton more money than the cheaper Target stores. Apple is going for the experience and looks conscious consumer, where there is a ton of cash to be made.

  70. More info on the iPod software by SpookComix · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The software they're using to power the iPod has been rumored to be ported to other hand-held devices as well. There are even talks of making the devices compatible with PCs, but possibly with limited functionality.

    --SC

    --
    You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th