Slashdot Mirror


Abit's New Motherboard Lays On The Ports

An enthusiastic reader submits: "Possibly the most innovative motherboard to be released in years, Abit's MAX series intends to dive headfirst into the next generation of computing, leaving legacy ports behind in their dust. Hardcoreware.net has the first full review of this board, which has support for 10 USB devices and 12 (YES, 12) IDE devices." I wish it had even more built-in USB ports, but six is a good start.

221 of 657 comments (clear)

  1. Funny.... by z84976 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And after all these years, i'm just NOW finally finding a need for more than the standard two serial ports! (x10 controller, ups, smartcard device, etc)

    1. Re:Funny.... by AmPz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A PC without RS232 ?! Now, the RS232 is probably the industrys most common interface. It's clean, it's simple, it's fast (using proper interrupts, compared to USB style). They claim that this board is aimed at the geek market. Ok... Let me ask one thing... the USB interface, is it amined at the geek market? Noo, it's supposed to simlify things for non geeks. Geeks work closer to the research at university's and the industry. You wount find USB in either places. Geeks use real ports, like the RS232, RS485 (a great multidrop interface that supports up to 10Mbit and 1km long wires!, and is as cheap and simple as RS232, but sadly enough it is only used in the industry) I consider myself fairly geeky, I'am a hardware designer and embedded software programmer. Ths USB is a insanely complex interface software wise, it consumes lot's of CPU power since it lacks DMA support (everything except USB and the floppy has DMA theese days), and it sucks at realtime applications (anyone with a USB mouse knows that). I don't want this board. And I'd advise anyone against buying it, since it lacks proper ports. The only ones that might want this board are OEM's (everything integrated, and only USB ports so that stupid users don't get confused by all the ports) Oh... Yes... There is another niche.. It might get the warez server market because of all the IDE chanels.

    2. Re:Funny.... by z84976 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's the kicker.... with $5 worth of parts from Radio Shack and an afternoon's ingenuity (even for a non-programming geek), you can still do something USEFUL with rs232c. Gotta love it. Try that with USB.

    3. Re:Funny.... by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why not just get a "USB TO SERIAL CONVERTER DB25M", its even supported under linux. I wanted to do this for a bbs, but the price per unit 45 bux was a little expensive.

    4. Re:Funny.... by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not? Let's repeat your parent post, but with your suggestion added:

      "Here's the kicker.... with $5 worth of parts from Radio Shack, a $45 converter for each serial port you need, and an afternoon's ingenuity (even for a non-programming geek), you can still do something USEFUL with rs232c. Gotta love it. Try that with USB"

      I don't want to spend $150 or whatever on a motherboard, and then spend another $50 for basic functionality. I'm sure Abit knows their target market, and I'm sure I'm not in it.

      -Paul

    5. Re:Funny.... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I dont have a need for rs232 on my workstation, thou I do need it on my ppp/firewall box. The only rs232 connection I had was a modem, and not that I use ethernet no need for it. Plus there are alot of USB modems on the market.

    6. Re:Funny.... by VAXman · · Score: 2

      Now, the RS232 is probably the industrys most common interface.

      I'd say Ethernet is probably more universal. But they're close.

      It's clean, it's simple, it's fast (using proper interrupts, compared to USB style).

      Now, this I disagree with. About 10 years ago, a computer store guy let me borrow book which was called, jokingly as he said, "RS-232 Made Simple". That book was something like 1000 pages of pure RS-232 hairiness. Anything but simple! I have more headaches with RS-232 than any other hardware. Every system has its own proprietary interface (isn't that what RS-232 is supposed to solve?!) and you have to make some weird custom cable for each configuration you want.

    7. Re:Funny.... by Erik+Fish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen, my brother!

      I've been hating on USB ever since it came out and gotten lots of funny looks for it from so-called performance junkies but the fact is it DOES hog CPU time that could be better put to use rendering my graphics.

      The drawback you didn't mention was the fact that built-in peripherals are an extremely Bad Thing. What happens when Abit stops making drivers? What if their drivers suck ass from the beginning? Give me name-brand components and plenty of slots to put them in, thankyouverymuch.

    8. Re:Funny.... by marko123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What do you mean, "it lacks DMA support?" My Dad uses DMA to get his assembly language microphone drivers to work better with USB.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    9. Re:Funny.... by TummyX · · Score: 2

      So go out and by a USB -> RS232 adapter.

    10. Re:Funny.... by IronChef · · Score: 2

      But those gadgets require drivers... ugh. That link you gave mentioned Windows XP drivers -- in beta even. Blech. I'd prefer to keep some old fashioned serial ports around for geek stuff. GPS, police scanner, ham radio, smart card stuff, old Palm Pilots, Philips Pronto, and a mess of other projects I am eying. I could easily use 5 serial ports.

    11. Re:Funny.... by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Try that with USB.

      Well, the cable is more than $5, but USB cable would serve very well as a garrote.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  2. Wow! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Funny

    With 12 IDE ports, it has nearly as much capacity as my 2-channel SCSI card!

    Hope you enjoy IRQ-sharing...

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Wow! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

      Actually, I also recommend 3ware cards if you have a lot of cheap IDE disks and can't afford to lose data. You can put together a terabyte of RAID 5 disk with 8 IDE drives and one 6810.

      I also recommend backups. Lots and lots of backups.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    2. Re:Wow! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "but given that IDE controllers are proven, extremely fast, "
      SCSI is also proven, and even faster.

      "and a dime a dozen"
      I am going to assume your talking about drives because you can get a UWide SCSI controller that supports 15 devices for about 25 bucks.

      yes, SCSI disks are more expensive, but a Corvette is more expensive then a camero. you get what you pay for.

      Your performance is really going to take a hit if you start loading up the IDE channels. The SCSI performance is not elusive, its proven. I have a cr-rw and a dvd player and 2 hardisks and I can play DVD, burn a cd, and run a compile in the background. My CPU usage hardly rises.
      As far as RAID goes, you can RAID SCSI as well.

      I suggest you try programming to both, then tell me which one is better.

      but hey, you want to use broken SCSI.... i mean, IDE drive, no skin off my nose.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Wow! by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hence the value of having multiple controllers : Each then has a dedicated pipe to the controller all to themselves, which is a superb reason to have more than the standard 2 controllers (so your CD-R, each of two hard drives, and DVD-ROM drive can all have their own controller).

    4. Re:Wow! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      overkill imho, if you want that many drives, scsi is the way to go.

      Depends what you want that many drives for... Besides, firewire is just as good, as far as usefulness vs. price.

    5. Re:Wow! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This argument has played out dozens of times, but given that IDE controllers are
      • proven - which is why they're used in high-availability, fault-tolerant servers the world over-- oh, wait. That's SCSI. Can you hot-swap IDE? Without voiding your warranty?
      • extremely fast - which is why the best-performing hard drives are IDE-- oh, wait, they're SCSI, too. For a fun experiment to do in your spare time, find me a 15k RPM IDE drive. Wait, no, find me just a 10k one. Oh, wait, no, find me simply a 7200 RPM IDE drive with 8MB of cache onboard.
      • and a dime a dozen - Okay, you've got me, there.
      • and IDE hardware can be had extremely cost effectively - It may be cheap, but is it cost-effective?

      I'll stick with IDE thanks (despite the hip elusive performance promise of SCSI)

      A promise which it makes good on. IDE fulfills the "cheap", and, sometimes the "good" of "cheap, good, and fast. Pick any two." SCSI fulfills "good" and "fast". You really do get what you pay for.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    6. Re:Wow! by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2
      Can you hot-swap IDE? Without voiding your warranty?


      I have read of people hot swapping the IDE drive of an X-Box in order to have the X-Box unlock the drive and then swap it to their computer so they can hack it.

      I also personally once had a CD-ROM drive that was so old (before there were good standards) if it was plugged in it would totally freeze my motherboard. Now I can't say if the drive was harmed or not but I had a bit of fun pluggin in the drive, freezing my computer, and then unplugging it and my computer unfroze, and the IDE controller on the motherboard wasn't hurt...

      I don't know about warranties though... Who needs 'em?

      Tim
      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    7. Re:Wow! by z84976 · · Score: 2

      Two channel scsi? I assume here you mean 2 channel SCSI-1. All "modern" wider scsi implementations will give you room for 15 devices. Of course, there's always relics like my old three narrow-channel adaptec (21 device total) which was sold to me BRAND new very cheaply some years ago because it was "only supported under novell." Heh. Novell and Linux, suckers...

    8. Re:Wow! by shuffle40 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually you can hot swap any drive. You must disconnect the signal before the power, though. That is why hot swappable drives have a special interface with the signal pins shorter than the power pins. Doing this properly does NOT void warranty!

      C'mon, if you are going to geek out and trump the performance of SCSI, get the facts straight!

      I agree with the original poster. That is not to say SCSI can't outperform IDE. But where is the pricepoint? IDE is catching up, and for the cost, I would say is already there. You need the best of the best, go with SCSI. You need a fast drive at a decent price, look IDE.

      It also helps that today's PC's have oodles of processor left over to help out w/IDE bus transfers. Obviously that influences my statements above too. If that wern't the case, the I/O handling that SCSI does would be invaluable, as it once was. I remember how many coasters I made on my first IDE burner...

    9. Re:Wow! by Sunda666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SCSI rocks, but until they charge a decent price for a SCSI drive (read: close to the one of a decent ATA133 7200RPM), i will stay away from it. God dammit, I can buy a 80GB ide drive for the price of a 18GB SCSI one. Something is wrong here.

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    10. Re:Wow! by ptbarnett · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh, wait, no, find me simply a 7200 RPM IDE drive with 8MB of cache onboard.

      While I agree that SCSI is better for servers, I can satisfy this request:

      Western Digital Caviar Special Edition 7200 Hard Drive WD1000JB

    11. Re:Wow! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Can you hot-swap IDE? Without voiding your warranty?
      Yup. Here is a hot-swap IDE drive caddy. Read the manual PDF file, and it will tell you on page 2 that it you can hot-swap drives with it.
    12. Re:Wow! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      so if you use scsi fine... but what if you dont want to clutter up your computer with all those cables... maybe your into pc mods

      You'll actually need more cables to hook up a bunch of IDE drives than to hook up a bunch of SCSI drives. IDE will only support two drives per channel, while narrow SCSI can support up to seven and wide SCSI handles up to 15 drives.

      As for riced-out PCs, I won't go there. Case cutouts and neon lights look as ridiculous on PCs as "powered by Foo" stickers, huge-ass spoilers, and fire extinguishers on the A-post look on small, underpowered cars.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    13. Re:Wow! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I admit that SCSI can be a royal pain in the ass to set up though.

      Where does this myth come from? SCSI is only marginally more difficult to get running than IDE:

      • Make sure every device has a unique ID.
      • Make sure termination is enabled only at the ends of the chain.
      • Make sure at least one device supplies termination power (most SCSI cards do, but some of the cheaper ones don't).
      • For maximum performance, don't mix LVD and SE devices (your LVD devices will more than likely support faster signaling rates than a single-ended interface can deliver).

      I've used SCSI devices for 12 years (started with a hard drive for my Apple IIe), and I've never run into the difficulties that some people mention.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:Wow! by gorilla · · Score: 2
      • Make sure you sacrifice a virgin goat
  3. Sweet! by theVitViper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I don't need all 5 of those Promise ATA contollers I've got!

  4. Just in case the site gets /.ed by 56ker · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's the first page: The Next Generation of motherboards...?

    Never has the announcement of a motherboard created as much buzz around the PC hardware enthusiast community as the Abit "MAX" series of motherboards (something tells me they really wanted to call it "Matrix" instead). This line of boards, available on both Athlon and Pentium 4 platforms, is Abit's attempt at taking motherboards one step into the next generation, leaving things like legacy ports in its dust.


    Windows 2000/XP/ME only. Win98 users need not apply.

    How significant is this step though? If you've been paying attention to the hype surrounding these boards, you might think that it is a giant leap for motherboard kind. We're going to find out if this is the case, or if the MAX series is rather a baby step.

    Giant leap or baby step, one thing is for certain, the AT7, Abit's first board in the MAX lineup, is definitely one of the most unique boards you'll see today. The AT7 uses the newest, fastest chipset for the Athlon platform, VIA's KT333. KT333 supports most of the newest features you'll need, such as native ATA/133 hard drives, onboard 5.1 audio with digital output, support for DDR333 SDRAM, and more. Abit takes that one step further, and adds a ton of integrated components intended for the next generation of computing. This includes both FireWire AND USB2.0 controller, a 4 channel ATA/133 RAID adapter (making for an unprecedented support of 10 ATA drives onboard), onboard 10/100 LAN, and MediaXP support. These would all be excellent useful addons for most boards, but that's where the MAX series is different - these aren't just addons for the motherboard, they actually replace all legacy parts on the board. Have a look!

    This is definitely the most unique ATX rear panel I've ever seen on a consumer board. Notice the complete lack of legacy ports - this includes PS/2, ATA, serial, parallel, the whole shebang! Instead, we get 4 USB 1.1 ports, 2 USB 2.0 ports, a pair of IEEE1394 FireWire ports, full analog 5.1 audio out, digital audio out, and a LAN connector. This is what really sets the MAX boards apart. It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old Dexxa ball mouse that came with your first SVGA card. While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off! Abit steps into a new era of computing with the MAX boards

    There are some other noticeable differences in the board layout. First off, you are only going to get 3 PCI slots. This is because most of the peripherals that would use a PCI slot, such as the Ethernet adapter and sound card, are already onboard. Personally I've never used more than 3 PCI slots, and with this board, not a single slot it used. Yep, 3 should definitely be enough.

    Despite having all the next-gen high performance capabilities, SCSI is still absent. This proves that while the AT7 is a very high end board, it is still targeted to the consumer market. Thanks, Abit!

    1. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by sheetsda · · Score: 3, Insightful
      There are some other noticeable differences in the board layout. First off, you are only going to get 3 PCI slots. This is because most of the peripherals that would use a PCI slot, such as the Ethernet adapter and sound card, are already onboard. Personally I've never used more than 3 PCI slots, and with this board, not a single slot it used. Yep, 3 should definitely be enough.

      Ouch. I was loving this board until I read that. I hate integrated components. If they die, or if something faster/cooler/better comes out that doesn't leave me enough slots to upgrade, so I have to replace the motherboard. Sorry Abit, you lost my business right there.

    2. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by pangloss · · Score: 2

      yeah, and i got to page 9 of 10 before their server stopped responding :P
      just ten more seconds and i would have finished loading the last page. f*ing slashdotters :P

      anyway, here's page nine for those of you who only got to page 8. this is the "gripes"/shortcomings page. maybe someone can post pg. 10 :P

      --

      The Sound Card

      Abit chose to use VIA's next gen onboard 5.1 sound card, dubbed "Avance". It looks good on paper, being a 5.1 AC97 sound chip, with digital capabilities. Abit certainly makes use of some of the digital capabilities by putting a TOSlink Out adapter on the board, allowing you to make a digital connection to an external decoder for movies, or to a digital set of speakers. TOSlink In looks like it might be an option, but wasn't on our board.

      I have noticed that more and more board manufacturers are shying away from VIA's onboard sound as their integrated option, and going for third party options such as those by C-Media or even Creative Labs. There may be many reasons for this, and I think I may have found a few of them...

      First off, let's have a quick look at performance, using ZD's Audio WinBench 99. We are only looking at the 44 kHz tests, and only those using 32 hardware voices; basically the most demanding situations possible.

      Test A - DirectSound 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Static, 32 Voices
      Test B - DirectSound 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Streaming, 32 Voices
      Test C - DirectSound 3D 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Static, 32 Voices
      Test D - DirectSound 3D 44.1 kHz, 16 bit, Streaming, 32 Voices

      Remember on this test, Lower = better. Now I am not going to go nuts and say this will give seriously hinder your performance, in fact I went through some game benchmarks with sound turned off and on, and performance differences were negligible. However it is worth noting that in the most stressful situations, the VIA onboard sound isn't quite up to the task compared to a solution like C-Media, which Shuttle has recently switched to.

      One more nasty issue I have with the sound card regards, I think, the drivers. During testing, we used a Philips MMS306 5.1 speaker set. We connected the speakers to the jacks just like on any sound card, and the sounds seemed to be coming from the wrong speakers... I used the alternate setting, using Line-In for the Centre/Woofer channel, and Line-Out for the Rear channels, and everything worked fine. It seems kind of silly that Abit ditched a parallel port to make room for some speaker outputs that are completely useless.

      The Layout

      If you have a keen eye, you might have noticed a glaring issue with the layout design of the board... I saved this for the rant page...

      That's right, the 'clip' end, where you would normally try to install the heatsink, is on the TOP of the board. When installed in a regular sized case, such as 17" or 18", it will likely be impossible to install or uninstall a heatsink - you will need to take the motherboard right out of the case if you don't have a full removable tray!

      I have seen a few boards do this before, and it always seems to be a mistake... I have no idea why Abit would consciously choose to design their board like this - it seems to go right against their usual support for the hardware community...

      If your other eye is just as keen as the first one, perhaps you noticed this:

      That's right, the memory slots are extremely close to the AGP slot, making ram installation pretty difficult with a video card installed. This is a very minor concern however, and I am not going to make much noise about this. After all, you could easily use DIMM3 and/or DIMM4 if you only have one or two stick of memory (of course even these will likely be blocked by a GeForce 4 Ti4400 or Ti4600, but then again, most memory slots will be in all likelihood). Also, most boards with 4 DIMMs tend to have this problem. It may be worth mentioning that the Shuttle AK35GTR doesn't have this problem though...

      With those rather minor gripes out of the way, let's get to the final conclusion!

    3. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Who cares about copyright when you're after karma? joke - ok? :0) Anyway I was the one who posted page 1 on the basis that I thought it would get /.ed - as the whole article is about 10 pages I'm quite within my rights to copy that much.

    4. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by elmegil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Giving up PS/2 as "legacy" is pretty much insane. There is no reasonably priced KVM switch that does BOTH USB and PS/2, and I'm not getting USB for my 486 firewall any time soon. PS/2 has PLENTY of life left in it, no matter what one mfr thinks.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    5. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Cuthalion · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are a lot of people who don't use KVM switches. Perhaps this motherboard may be useful to them.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    6. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Ozan · · Score: 2, Funny

      man telnet

    7. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ChadN · · Score: 2

      There are cheap dongles that allow you to attach your USB mouse to a PS/2 port, and I'm assuming they work for keyboards as well. Besides the Belkin OmniView Soho KVM switches DO allow mixing USB and PS/2 computers on the switch, and they can be found at reasonable prices.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    8. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Umm, yeah. I see myself upgrading my 100Mb home network sometime soon. . .

      And better than 5.1 channel sound? Sure, but how many people really care about that?

      Right now my 5 slots are occupied by a NIC (taken care of) a Live! (taken care of) a 1394 (taken care of) a 2940U2W (down to two slots) and an IDE RAID card (taken care of).

      Hmm. Seems as though I have room to grow. Besides, we replace computers every two years anyway. You might have to upgrade the 1394 by then. But not much else. Jesus, I'd sell my soul for 10 USB ports.

      --
      - Dan I.
    9. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Arandir · · Score: 2

      I have no problems with a PS/2-less motherboard, so long as the BIOS can detect and use my USB keyboard, and pass on the keystrokes transparently to the OS. You see, I don't use Windows. Nor do I use any of the fancy Linux distros that include every possible driver in the boot image. I need the keyboard when I install an OS, so I need the keyboard to work before the OS is installed. It's sort of a chicken-and-egg problem.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    10. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      "KEYBOARD AND MOUSE CONVERTER PS2 TO USB" works just fine on KVMs.

    11. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      I just went to Kmart. Three 4 port USB hubs, total... $89.97.

      My soul is assessed at a slightly higher value.

    12. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      You're not getting this motherboard for your 486 firewall either, I hope.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    13. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      You realize they make other motherboards with PS/2 slots, right? Just because they have a non-legacy motherboard doesn't mean you have to buy it, or that they're phasing out all other boards. They're not stupid, just cutting-edge.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    14. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Redundant

      I hate integrated components. If they die, or if something faster/cooler/better comes out that doesn't leave me enough slots to upgrade...

      Let's say you put in an Audigy in place of on-board sound.

      And a PCI gigabit Ethernet NIC instead of the on-board 10/100.

      And a GeForce4 in the AGP 4x slot.

      You still have 10 USB ports, two firewire ports, 6 IDE headers (for 12 devices). You can put anything you want in that final PCI slot. Unless you're building a server or a videa-editing center with multiple PCI cards, you're going to be hard pressed to find a way to obsolete this board in the next 48 months.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    15. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Windows 2000/XP/ME only. Win98 users need not apply.... onboard sound...

      OK, forget about this board. It smells of planned obsolescence. The extra IDE slots are the bait. Almost everything else is a hook. What if I want to install DOS on this board. OK, probably not, but just knowing that I can is nice. Wintel boxes are nice because they are backwards compatable and give you a choice of what cards to use. If I wanted onboard everything and was never going to swap out or uprade, I'd get an iMac. Then of course there is the question that every /.er *must* ask: Did MS have a hand in making this not work with earlier versions of Windows?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    16. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by DuranDuran · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Sorry Abit, you lost my business right there.

      ...and in other news today, Abit has said that they will cancel production of their new MAX motherboard line due to the comments of one "Sheetsda" on slashdot.org.

      "We were hoping we could please everyone with this move", said an Abit spokesman, "but it turns out we really read the market totally wrong. Sheetsda's comment, however offhand, has really shaken us".

      Abit are said to be in talks with Sheetsda to work out what he wants.

      DD

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    17. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2

      Let's see...

      MPEG-2 decoder/encoder, 1 slot
      Video I/O, 1 slot
      Video I/O, 1 slot
      Video I/O, 1 slotAudigy, 1 slot

      Hmm.. yep, amateur videa editing does it. And just imagine what it takes for high-end... But then, all high-end video editing is done with Linux on alphas, or IRIX on mips.

    18. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Giving up PS/2 as "legacy" is pretty much insane. There is no reasonably priced KVM switch that does BOTH USB and PS/2, and I'm not getting USB for my 486 firewall any time soon.

      IBM model M keyboards also tend to not work too well when plugged into USB ports (read: they don't work at all). Most of the newer keyboards feel like they have mush under the keys.

      (There might well be USB-to-PS/2 converters available...but that would seem to be a kludge. Ditto for USB-to-serial and USB-to-parallel...is it really that big a deal to keep the two PS/2 ports, two serial ports, and one parallel port that belong on every computer?)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    19. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Macs seem to work fine without "lagacy" ports... no floppy drive even.

      That only happend because Steve Jobs cranked up his Reality Distortion Field® to full power. I understand that more than a few people grumbled about losing their ADB and SCSI ports.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    20. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed by ameoba · · Score: 2

      ...and there never will be cheap USB KVMs until there's enough hardware out there requiring USB KVMs to create a market for them.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  5. The abit website by young-earth · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who are unaware, the Abit website is NOT www.abit.com; that reroutes you to motherboards.com. The site you want is www.abit-usa.com or www.abit.com.twinstead.

  6. ....more pics can be found here... by NYCEE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    check out this site for some pretty pictures of abits new board http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/abit/at7/at7previe w1.htm

  7. Re:Makes you wonder by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What will the usefulness of 12 IDE ports be? Anyone who needs that much hard drives will be using SCSI

    I'd love it. Every time I buy more hard drive space, I have to toss another drive from my box (dvd-rom + cdrw + 2 hd's). I'm working on a nice little pile, currently 10 and 20gb drives at the top. That kind of space is nothing to sniff at. It'd be nice to just pop them in, it's the space I want, not the marginal increase in access time or transfer rate.

    SCSI costs more, always has, always will. I shouldn't need to spend the extra $hundreds just to be able to use a few drives at once, hence the need for boards like this. Of course, the mobo probably costs a small fortune, but if a LOT were like this, then my point would make more sense :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  8. Re:Huh? by gregfortune · · Score: 2

    Yup, read the article. 4 of the 10 are internal.

  9. Wow 12 IDE's by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2, Funny

    12 * 160 GB = is almost 2 TB!!!

    And the sound of a 747 taking of comes @ no extra charge!

    1. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by AstroJetson · · Score: 2

      And the sound of a 747 taking of comes @ no extra charge!

      Yup, and with an Athlon and a GeForce in there too, it can double as a weenie roaster.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    2. Re:Wow 12 IDE's by red_dragon · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yup, and with an Athlon and a GeForce in there too, it can double as a weenie roaster.

      It's the perfect flight simulator box! Not only are the engine sounds simulated, but the engine exhaust heat is simulated too!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  10. Re:Completely useless by NineNine · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I don't even know what an AST Rampage is... All I know is I'm running a PII 250, and it works just fine. If you have to buy new parts because you can't make your old stuff work, sounds like you got some learning to do.

  11. Re:Stability by mr_gerbik · · Score: 2

    What?? My KT7 is stable as a mofo'. Overclocks like a charm too. Never had a problem with it. (knock on wood)

  12. very odd... by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

    my fav MB is still the tyan thunder K7 with onboard dual scsi ultra 160. it has all the pins for more USB if you want, and the nature of USB itselfs lets you add on as you need it... there is no need to START with 10 ports.

    as for IDE, i thought they were getting rid of legacy support?!

    this seems worthless to me. in fact, i think i'll go get another thunder K7 on pricewatch just to show abit where they should be heading.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:very odd... by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      They couldn't exactly get rid of IDE just yet, especially considering that there aren't any comparable consumer-level technologies available yet. Firewire is the closest, but until drives are available with actual firewire interfaces, IDE won't stand a chance of going away.

      As well, does the Thunder K7 have support for USB 2.0? Obviously, you can add a card, but having all the ports for the latest and greatest is what this MB is about. Also, for someone like me, having that many USB ports is great. It means that I don't have to buy a USB hub or any extra parts or cards or anything. Every USB device I own, 1.1 or 2.0, will have its own spot on the motherboard, instead of the nice mixture of cards and hubs I have now. More than likely, this is the board that I'll use in my next system.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    2. Re:very odd... by bonzoesc · · Score: 2

      Because people are willing to pay more for SCSI, and the manufacturers don't see a real business need to make them ass-cheap quite yet. That's a shame, because I only have money for IDE drives but I have a spare PCI slot beggin' for a SCSI controller to speed up my legal MP3 downloads of albums I already own on CD. Uh huh.

    3. Re:very odd... by HalfFlat · · Score: 2

      For reference, the Tyan Tiger MPX board used to ship with a USB 1.1 card, not a USB 2.0 card.

      On the other hard, the latest revision of the board uses an updated version of the AMD chipset which resolves the bug, and thus has working on-board USB.

    4. Re:very odd... by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      There's no reason a PS/2 wireless keyboard should work any better than a USB one.

      In fact, there's plenty of reason that the USB one would work better than the PS/2 one. Case in point, my MS Natural Pro KB. It has both PS/2 and USB connectors. If you plug it into the PS/2 port, it comes up as a standard keyboard and you must install the IntelliPoint software in order for all the extras to work. However, plug it into the USB port and Windows autodetects the type of keyboard it is and installs support for the extra features automatically (at least under XP). For someone who uses the extra features a lot, not having to go through the hassle of installing software and rebooting and such is great--enough for me to choose the USB over PS/2, anyway.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  13. Re:Makes you wonder by TheMatt · · Score: 2

    My guess is 4 channels are RAID. So you could have 8 drives in a RAID setup. The other two channels are normal IDE for CD/DVD drives, Zip, etc. If you look at the pics, it looks like 4 RAID ports and 2 normal IDE ports.

    --

    Fortran programmer...oh yeah. Array math for life!

  14. Re:Just in case the site gets /.ed (Page 2) by xkenny13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    [Page 2 is also pretty interesting ... then it delves into BIOS screen shots and benchmarks]
    .
    .
    .

    Got Storage?

    Have a look at the vast number of ATA connectors - 6 channels! The yellow connectors are for the Highpoint ATA/133 RAID controller (which works perfectly fine in non-RAID mode). The two higher up on the board are the natively controlled IDE channels, also supporting ATA/133. This makes for an amazing 12 possible drives without the use of a single PCI slot!

    Below the RAID channels you'll see a floppy adapter, one of the lingering legacy ports still found on this generation of MAX boards... I personally don't use a floppy drive anymore, but it will be necessary to use a floppy if you plan on installing Windows XP on a drive controlled by the Highpoint IDE. How ironic!

    Besides what I've mentioned, and the fact that there are 4 RAM slots (up to three 1GB sticks may be used at a time with non-registered RAM, four if you are using registered), the layout is pretty much standard ATX fare. There are a couple nasty layout problems though, which I'll get to later in the review.

    In addition to the 6 USB ports on the ATX rear panel (4 USB1.1 and 2 USB2.0), there are onboard connectors for 4 more USB 2.0 connectors, for a total of 10 devices! There is also an extra output for one more IEEE1394 port. The IEEE1394 controller used by the AT7 is capable of full speed 400mb/sec. So no matter what interface your advanced external peripherals are going to use, Abit definitely has you covered with the AT7.

    Once again, Abit gets unique with the AT7, this time with the bundle. Included are a set of nifty black IDE cables (3 IDE cables, 1 floppy cable). This is a great way to have some nice looking custom IDE cables without worrying about using rounded cables (IDE cables are flat for a reason you know!). Also included are a set of cable tie-downs, to aide in keeping your PC nice and tidy inside. This is a great little bundle for a motherboard! A custom ATX rear panel plate is also included of course; the one that came with your case is now officially outdated. You also get one PCI plate USB adapter, to be used on one of the USB2.0 outputs on the motherboard. I would have liked to see a pair of these, in addition to another firewire adapter, since the board supports it. Unfortunately, you're going to have to get your own this time.

    MediaXP

    One significant absence in our package (I believe Abit is going to make it an option for some retail packages) is a MediaXP panel! MediaXP is one of the great steps forward with the MAX series. Basically, it adds integrated support for various portable media, including Smart Media, Compact Flash, and even Sony's Memory Stick. MediaXP also includes headphone and microphone jacks, SPDIF ports, and 2 USB ports! It is expected that most cases will start using MediaXP panels, rather than their own Mickey Mouse panels you see now. It is already beginning to look like the MAX is taking the PC a step in the right direction...

  15. Re:Completely useless by Elbereth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish motherboard manufacturers would stop integrating all this useless stuff. I don't want integrated sound, IDE RAID, or any of that other junk. I don't even particularly care for integrated IDE.

    Think of how much more stable the motherboards would be if there were less chips present and less IRQs being shared. Oh yeah, in theory PCI is supposed to share IRQs with no problem, but that doesn't mean it actually works out that way in practice.

    There wouldn't be much cost savings associated with getting rid of these functions, but spending $5 or $10 less on a product is always nice.

    And, no, sometimes you can't just turn these features off in the BIOS. Even worse, sometimes there's no way to reclaim the IRQs that are lost due to integrated functions! Check out some of the really bad implementations out there. It's a nightmare trying to make those poorly designed boards work. Abit is not known for their stability or great design, so I don't have much faith in this motherboard. Even if Asus made a board like this, I would have some trouble trusting it.

    Getting rid of the PS/2 ports is just asinine. They are an industry standard. USB sucks. PS/2 works.

  16. Re:Completely useless by JesseL · · Score: 2

    Just who do you expect is buying new motherboards? People hoping to drop in a replacement for the dead mobo in their XT? If you're happy with legacy ports and busses, nobody is forcing you to upgrade. For me, the next time I build a PC, I'd rather not have interrupts and physical space taken up by interfaces I haven't used in at least three years.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  17. Re:Completely useless by brer_rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've got plenty of working ISA cards. TRUE geeks don't buy new hardware just because it's new. TRUE geeks keep working shit working. People who buy the latest and greatest the second it comes out are called wannabe's.

    So, why exactly are you not only reading, but also posting, to Slashdot?

  18. Re:Makes you wonder by shyster · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What will the usefulness of 12 IDE ports be? Anyone who needs that much hard drives will be using SCSI, and its not Serial ATA, could anyone explain why this is useful to me?

    According to the cut and paste job above ( Most importantly, IDE RAID...which rocks. With IDE drives, RAID lives up to it's name: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. True, no hot swap, and they're not as fast as SCSI, but for a consumer board (and even non-mission-critical low-end servers), IDE-RAID is the way to go.

    Then, there's the advantage of not having to put an older ATA/66 drive on the same channel as an ATA/133 drive. Or, to be able to split up your CD-ROM drive and your CD-RW to make disc to disc copying faster and more reliable. Or, put your swap drive on a different channel (and RAID it!) to give it more bandwidth.

    I can think of many more uses for 5 IDE channels (assuming 2 ports to a channel) than I can for 6 USB ports (wouldn't a USB hub be just as effective), or for 2 Firewire ports (let's see...DV camera, and...uh...)

  19. Re:Completely useless by NineNine · · Score: 2

    TRUE geeks know how to get X Windows working without the latest and greatest.

    Poverty ain't the issue. It's the fact that any kid can go down to the local store and buy the latest shit every week. That's fucking lame. Get an old box working well, and that's fucking cool.

  20. Re:Completely useless by AntiNorm · · Score: 5, Funny

    TRUE geeks buy hardware 'cause it's new and 'cause it lets you do more things faster.

    Actually, true geeks design their own hardware from the circuit level up.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  21. Stupid wast of space by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

    You want more USB ports, get a USB hub, they're cheap, their easy, and they work fine. I have 2 USB ports on my computer, one is broken, I got a 4 port USB hub, so now I can plug in my printer, scanner, CF/SM card reader, and my MP3 player. If I need more ports, I'll go get another hub, or a bigger (8 port) hub. USB has been designed this way so you wouldn't need that many ports on the computer.

    More firewire ports would be better. I've never seen a firewire hub, and if they are out there, they're probably expensive.

    1. Re:Stupid wast of space by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      Yah, and my 4 port USB hub was only $12.. I would much rather have more firewire ports onboard, then USB ports.

    2. Re:Stupid wast of space by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      Could be true for a possibly extra-magic "boot keyboard" (if the BIOS is set to do keyboard emulation), but that's certainly not true in general. I've sometimes amused myself by plugging in a cheap USB keyboard into my little 4-port USB hub, with the machine running, and just typing away on it. All without disconnecting my regular name brand PS/2 keyboard, of course. Oh, and that's under Linux, too, if anyone was still having doubts about USB capabilities there. Now, if only said name brand actually had a USB model available here... ;^)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  22. ABIT's Media Sheet by svferris · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a link to ABIT's media sheet on the motherboard, which gives a good rundown of the new features of the board, as well as what they were thinking when designing it.

    ABIT MAX Media Sheet

  23. Re:Makes you wonder by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about the money you throw away everytime you have to lose a hard drive?

    "marginal increase in access time or transfer rate. "
    the difference between the newest IDE and the newest SCSI is far more then marginal. And God help you if you want to access more then 2 devices at a time.

    If you don't believe me, go ahead and compare a 3.9 ms SCSI drive to a 3.9ms IDE drive..oh wait, they don't exist.

    As someone who has written low levely IDE and SCSI code, I can assure there are many benifits with SCSI then the access time.
    The cosr isn't that much higher, and if there were a lot of mobos manufactured with SCSI, there would be no price difference.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. Re:Makes you wonder by Elbereth · · Score: 2

    Extra hundreds? Where are you buying your computer parts? I just bought a brand new, shrink wrapped Ultra Wide SCSI adapter for $25. It supports 15 SCSI devices, any number of which can be internal or external. And it only uses one IRQ.

  25. Terabyte system for the masses? by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    4 Channels on an integrated RAID controller? Lets see, with 8x 120GB drives, that gives you 960GB, at less than $2000 for the entire system (assuming this board will be less than $200). Not quite a terabyte, but if you moved to 8x 160GB drives, that gives you about 1.3TB, but makes it quite a bit more expensive.


    Not that you would _want_ to put 8 drives in a RAID 0 array. The chances of failure and total data loss are just too high. But it's cool that you can.


    12 friggin' IDE channels. The mind boggles. Perhaps I can finally use up all the bays in my full-size tower. It looks mighty pathetic with just my CDRW and a floppy.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by tcc · · Score: 2

      Thing is 4 Channels with IDE raid means 4 CHANNELS, if you put it Slave/master, even if you can stick up 8 drives, it won't go faster than it would with 4 drives as masters.

      If you are serious about buying 12 drives to make a datacenter or a half-decent raid, unless you go with old drives or buy a buttload of 20-40gigs for next to nothing, You'd probably have the budget to get a REAL raid card that does decent raid5 performance like a 3Ware 7810 (8 channels, 64 bits, 48bits LBA, all the goodies plus not limited to standard PCI 33mhz/32bits speed) And if you're a bit richer, maybe a 7850 (more cache for raid 5 performance), else there's always cheaper 6810 boards that run on a standard PCI bus, either way, it'll give you FAR better performance than this board.

      Of course, if it's to brag that your board can take 12 drives and want to connect your mom's 40megs and the brother's older 1gig drive and so on... that's another story

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    2. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by bravehamster · · Score: 2, Funny
      I know that having 8 drive wouldn't make it go faster than 4 drives. Speed wasn't what I was talking about, merely being able to have a single logical drive over a terabyte. Hmm...terabyte...it just rolls off the tongue. Size, not speed. Because we all know that in the end, despite what the ladies say, size does matter ;)

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    3. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not that you were going to rush out and set up your terabyte array, but here's a word of caution anyway. Terabyte filesystems aren't that common among Linux and FreeBSD users (which I know for sure; I'll bet NetBSD users aren't real interested, either...;-) That means they aren't well tested. Furthermore, there are limits to what is supported. For instance, the 160MB drives aren't supported in linux 2.4 yet, and filesystems have maximum sizes.

      Before anyone decides to invest heavily in a terabyte+ array thinking they'll access it as a single logical device, I recommend investing some time reading the linux kernel mailing list, or do similar reading for the OS of choice. Along with some friends, I've spent a lot of time looking at these issues lately, and there are a lot of "gotchas" for unwary users (which almost included us).

      -Paul Komarek

    4. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      It's OK if you use XFS and software RAID.

      Last I checked, most people were having problems creating single non-raid block devices larger than 1TB, but I think that is mostly fixed, except for some overflows that cause numbers to be reported incorrectly. This means you have hardware RAID that makes a single sda or hda device that is larger than one TB. This can be avoided by breaking up the hardware RAID into multiple devices and using software raid on those. (use it to your advantage and implement RAID 10, or RAID 0 (software) over 5 (hardware))

      You are correct in that there are a lot of little gotchas. I built a Linux system at work with 1.9TB of space in an single md device using the XFS stock kernel with no extra patches though, so it isn't too bad.

      I was able to put EXT3 on it, but if you don't have 2 days to waste waiting for mkfs to finish, you need to tell it to only put one inode per 4 megs. This means that if most of your files will be less than 4 megs, you are going to run out of inodes before the file system is full.

      XFS has no such problem, and only takes a few seconds to mkfs, but takes a little longer to mount each time.

      It is definitely something that can be done at home, it's just not going to be quite as trivial as making a normal sized volume.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by rich22 · · Score: 3, Funny

      For instance, the 160MB drives aren't supported in linux 2.4 yet, and filesystems have maximum sizes.

      No wonder I can't get my 486sx/25 w/ 16mb of ram and a 160mb HDD to run this crazy Linux!!!

    6. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by TarpaKungs · · Score: 2, Informative
      Slight deviation of topic

      The parent post deserves a reply - not because I disagree (Paul is right to offer caution) but because I can add something here. Feel free to mod me offtopic.

      I can confirm that linux handles TB filesystems reliably in my limited experience

      Where I work (Imperial College, London) we have an online backup system consisting of 16 disks on a Chaparral RAID controller hanging off a cheap 1U Intel box. Using some perl I wrote in conbination with rsync, we pull copies of most data (shared group, sysadmin stuff, home dirs) onto this array - keeping a full copy and a week's worth of "reverse diffs" (files which have been updated, but I got rsync to kick them sideways rather than deleting them).

      Whole lot is NFS and samba exported so short term file recovery is DIY for the users (saves a *lot* of time).

      Anyway - here's the df -lk listing:

      Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
      /dev/vg00/lvexport1 1050132564 822295616 227836948 79% /export/recover

      You'll notice that I'm using LVM - which in itself has a 1TB limit on the size of a single logical volume (well right now it does on the version I'm using).

      Next version of my code will deal with pools of disk so I don't have to use LVM anymore. The filesystem is ext3 running on SuSE 7.2 with a locally patched build of 2.4.17.

      Approximately 3-5GB of files are moved every night and it has (fingers crossed) been very reliable.
      My advice would be to stick to ext3. Reiserfs I used at home and it was very reliable. But on 180 odd lab PCs we have, where Reiserfs is used on /, we have found that odd system crashes *can* sometimes result in null data or even randon data (extents from other files or off the free list) have ended up inside live files, like /etc/passwd, which isn't very convenient ;-)
      I've seem XFS leave files full of null data under similar circumstances. So I actually think, for the hack that it is, ext3 gives a certain warm feeling on those sorts of filesystems. Ext3 even on a system which was crashing due to a mixture of (older) kernel problems and flaky firmware on the RAID never lost anything (at least as far as we've noticed).

      So far so good. Your milage may vary of course. And do as Paul says - check the limits of the drives and the filesystems you are thinking of using.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    7. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by mwillis · · Score: 2

      I'm curious if the configurer considered JBOD and software raid5?

      I have one of the cheapie 3ware cards (6400, $100 on sale). When configuring I read an interesting web page (Google cache) about using arrays of 6800's in JBOD mode (and letting the O/S do the RAID5 math.)

      The advantage to this is that if you have 32 drives, you have 31 drives worth of information and 1 drive of redundancy information. With four 8-drive cards, you get 1 raid5 checksum drive per sub-array and hence only 28 drives worth of information.

      Of course the 6xxx series has poor performance raid5 anyway, so software raid5 makes more sense.

    8. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by WNight · · Score: 2

      A consideration is that you may want more parity drives. Most drives tend to die for a reason, such as a power surge, or when shut down. This means that you're more likely to see a couple drives go at once than you would be if they just died during normal operation. Because of this, RAID units actually tend to lose a few drives at once even if the MTBF suggests otherwise.

      So, if you have one 35+1 array, losing any two drives could kill it.

      If you have four 7+1 arrays RAID 0ed together and lose two drives, there's a 1/4 chance that both drives were on the same array, which would kill it.

      You could do four 6+2 arrays, but then you only get 3/4 of the space you paid for. That does take your safety margin to three disks, and only 1/16th of the time. That's probably safe enough to trust.

      But ideally you'd do one large 28+4 array, without much more loss of space than originally (7/8ths usable) and it could tolerate the loss of any four drives, regardless of location. But I don't think that's possible with these cards, given that each controls only eight drives.

      So you could do a software 3+1 RAID5 of four 7+1 arrays, which would tolerate the loss of any one array, which would happen 1/4 of the time with a two drive loss. But you're now back under the 3/4 usable space (21/32 actually) which starts to suck.

      Unfortunately, there just isn't a good way to do it with that many drives and hardware RAID 5 that only supports eight at a time.

    9. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      The problematic details to which I was referring occur at the filesystem level. I haven't seen anything suggesting that software or hardware RAID or linux's lvm layer isn't up to it (though it seems like I remember something vague about possible problems with FreeBSD's vinum). It's ext[23] and UFS that seem to have some issues with really large volumes. And even if there weren't any reports, building a terabyte+ filesystem puts you in a small class of users whose needs are not mainstream. The significance of this is the amount of debugging and fiddling you have to do, or stability problems you have to tolerate. Ask any linux/Alpha user what I mean. =-/

      Some posts here have suggested that many of the little gotchas have been taken care of, and also that XFS is doing a good job on really large filesystems. This is all good news. However, it is my opinion that until the new IDE stuff in linux 2.5 solidifies and is backported to 2.4 (or released in 2.6!), big filesystems on linux will have "issues" (even if they aren't bugs). I think the next FreeBSD release ought to clear up a lot of this stuff, too.

      What I'd really like is for Andre Hedrick to reply to my posts and prove me wrong!

      -Paul Komarek

    10. Re:Terabyte system for the masses? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      EXT does seem to not be designed with TB+ in mind. As I said, the file system creation is very slow with any more than one inode per 4 or 8 megs, taking up to 8 hours to complete. Also, fsck takes fscking forever.

      One of the things is that the IDE layer stuff doesn't matter with 3ware cards, because of the SCSI virtual interface they provide, so most of us terabyters are immune to those.

      I have seen people with promise type cards have major troubles getting tons of hdX type devices to work well.

      Your point is taken, there are issues a home user would not normally be exposed to, but that happens anytime a user goes off the beaten track.

      If it were trivial to build such large systems, it would be hard to impress your friends with it. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  26. 3 PCI? by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ATM I have TV card, Sound Card, and NIC in my system; sure, this system's got on board NIC and sound, but so what? I have an SB Live that'll beat most on board stuff (well, maybe, I'm not a great fan of Live's anymore :), and needing another NIC isn't that unlikely; 3 is definately going to feel cramped.

    1. Re:3 PCI? by Kallahar · · Score: 2

      I've got a SBLive also, but it's now sitting in a box. I found that the Asus KT266E (I think) has an onboard sound card that sounds just as good as the live. IANAA (I am not an audiophile) though.

      Not THAT many people need dual nic's, most just connect dirrect or to a hub or DSL router.

      I run out of slots by having: SCSII controller, two extra video cards (three monitors).

      So yeah, even if they just added one more it would probably be nice, there's always more stuff to plug in that's cool :)

    2. Re:3 PCI? by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      The system's also got optical outputs, so while it won't work for 3d-sound-enabled games, it'll do for just about anything else. It may not be an extigy, but it's not going to kill you to shelve the SB Live if you need the PCI slot. So you could get by with two PCI slots, if you had USB 2.0 and Firewire, couldn't you?
      I've got an Abit NV7-133R sitting in the box that comes with what is probably the same audio setup they talk about, sitting here by my desk. I'm still waiting for the case, so admittedly I have not listened to it, but if it is as I'm told it is, you won't complain. Mine has optical input and output, minijacks for mic and line-in and one each for front left/right, rear left/right, and center channel/subwoofer. I'm going to have to buy another set of speakers, because my SB Live Value card only does front/rear left/right, so I don't have a center channel. So you're down to your TV Card.
      Even though I'd rather not use their drivers for the sound card, I still hope your TV card's this: Creative's Video Blaster Digital VCR
      That TV card encodes mpeg-2 in real time, and you can schedule record times. I bought one of those and a couple of 80gb HDs I'm going to stipe together--the board's got built-in RAID via HighPoint HPT372! (And the thing was only $137 w/second day air!). I figure at 1.1mbps, I can fit over 300 hours of TV shows. Or if I figure out a way to convert to divx via a batch file, I might pull 500 hours. And then there're CDs.
      Did you ever just want to have your own library of TV at your fingertips? South Park, Saturday Night Live, Movies, MST3k(saturday mornings!!), MTV, a complete season of Broncos Football, whatever flips your cookie. And it's not even unethical. Total cost to me: $300 for TV card and HDs, plus CDRs, which are cheeeep.
      I'm building the full system for $900, Monitor and all, and it's got an Athlon XP 1800+ and GF2 video. while I could easily pay more for things such as an Extigy, it's not worth so much more money when these new motherboards are so good.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    3. Re:3 PCI? by hendridm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the point is to upgrade with USB devices. NICs and video are available for USB. Perhaps not the best support yet, but I think they are try to pioneer a move toward more development of more non-PCI devices.

    4. Re:3 PCI? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      I am an audiophile. That's why I don't listen to music on computers. Not only can't you get truly good, uncompromising sound equipment in a small space filled with electrical noise (i.e. your computer), but computer fans wipe out significant audio detail.

      If you really care about sound, you have a special room for listening, and you won't have your PC in there. Why would anyone spend serious money on audio equipment, and then ruin the sound with computer fans, keyboard and mouse clicks? If you really care about sound, you focus on it while you listen -- that means you aren't surfing the web, writing code, and sending email.

      All of that said, I'm also a grad student and spend almost all day, every day writing code and sending email. So my "budget" audio equipment (NAD, because I can't afford the "real" stuff or the listening room to go with it) is in the same room as my computers. If I'm lucky (i.e. once a month), I'll have some time at the end of the day to turn the computers off and do some listening.

      -Paul Komarek

    5. Re:3 PCI? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      "That's funny. I always thought the definition of an audiophile was someone who listens to the equipment rather than the music. ;-)"

      "but I've given up the term "audiophile" when I relised it put me in the same class as people who buy BOSE. :)"

      Now those are some funny quotes. =-) I only use the term "audiophile" when defending the interests of people with good ears. That said, it's probably better to buy season tickets for the best seats in the house, than to drop enormous sums of money on audio equipment.

      I helped a friend build a recording rig, and in the end we gave up on making it quiet and found good headphones. Someday, maybe, I'll try water cooling.

      -Paul Komarek

  27. Re:Completely useless by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want to congratulate the company on making a motherboard that is virtually useless to anybody who isn't bleeding edge. I don't even have a single USB device, and I still use ISA cards extensively because they'er so damn cheap.

    I used to do that. Then I decided that I'd rather not have to beat my head against a wall mucking with IRQ conflicts and port addresses to save $10.

    USB keyboards are dirt cheap. USB mice are dirt cheap. If you're shelling out for a new system in the first place, replacing keyboards and mice are a negligeable cost (and you'd want new ones regardless, so that you can still keep the old machine active).

    Graphics-wise, I'd have to be paid a lot of money to go back to using a graphics card obsolete enough to be ISA, even if all I'm doing is running a 2D desktop. Network-wise, PCI network cards are *almost* as dirt-cheap as your keyboard and mouse.

    In summary: If you're buying a new motherboard at all, you can afford to upgrade the peripherals.

  28. Re:Huh? by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

    What I don't get is the use of the word "devices". I thought you could put like 10 devices on a single USB port, assuming there's enough juice to power them all?

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
  29. Re:Makes you wonder by r00tdenied · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, I think he was referring to the price of the disks themselves. a 40 GB SCSI hard disk is at about $400, but the same size IDE drive is only $80. So what if the adapters are cheap? Its the drives that are expensive.

    --
    Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
  30. Re:IEE 1394 baby! by PhuCknuT · · Score: 2, Informative

    It also has 2 usb2.0 ports, which are 480 mbps, faster than firewire.

  31. Re:Makes you wonder by geekoid · · Score: 2

    RAID SCSI doesn't rock? Why does a consumer even need raid? if you are serious enough about HD speed to learn RAID, then you should be going SCSI. really, this is just an expensice way to try to get the advantages of SCSI.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. I like my peripherals, thanks. by SamIIs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quoth the review:
    It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old mouse... While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off!

    Ya know, I really like my peripherals. I have a great Gateway Programmable keyboard that has built-in hardware macros (so it's not OS dependant) and a slick logitech trackball that fits my hand well. My printer is pretty crummy, but it has this great ability to turn text into physical paper, which is all I need.

    Having a motherboard which boasts of the ability to make me buy new hardware isn't quite what I'm looking for.

    Sam

    1. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by dimator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having a motherboard which boasts of the ability to make me buy new hardware isn't quite what I'm looking for.

      Well, I doubt it's really aimed at people with old peripherals. It's intended for new machines with new everything.

      And you can't really blame them for trying to cut off old technologies... someone had to start doing it, or we'd be using old standards forever. Remember the old, big, round keyboard adaptor? (I dont even remember what it was called.) If manufacturers never said "OK, enoughs enough, PS/2 or the highway from now on" we'd still be stuck with that crap. You got to make sacrifices if you want progress.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Arandir · · Score: 2

      Ditto. I have a Logitech Trackman with three, count them, three buttons. And no fscking scroll wheel! Nobody makes anything even close to this anymore.

      I'm with you. I'm not going to throw away my mouse, my laserjet, my UPS or my keyboard. I finally got an AGP video card, so I'm guessing I still have three months of life in it before someone comes up with another standard...

      p.s. If anyone has, or knows where I can get another of these trackballs new, let me know...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:I like my peripherals, thanks. by Zocalo · · Score: 2
      I have one of those Gateway Anykey-124 Programmable keyboards and they rock. I wish I had this keyboard at work on my Sun. No one I've seen makes a keyboard like this anymore:

      Drifting slightly off topic, but geeks like their keyboards to do stuff instead of resorting to rodents, right? Cherry do some pretty cool keyboards for geeks, but the one I've linked to is the one I intend to replace my Gateway 124 with.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  33. Buy a hub by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    "I wish it had even more built-in USB ports, but six is a good start"

    Am I the only one with so many wires connected to their PC that it looks like a plate of spaghetti? 4 ports is more than enough on the computer after that I found it's better to use a hub. I have one on the other desk where my printer and scanner are and one by the keyboard for my MP3 player and Digital Camera.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  34. Re:Completely useless by underactive · · Score: 2, Funny

    ISA??! hey, the 1980's called... it wants its computer back. :-P

    --
    my other computer is your Windows(tm) box...
  35. Re:Completely useless by linzeal · · Score: 2
    Hahaha, lol.

    Mod parent up you wankers

  36. Re:Not so many ports... by red5 · · Score: 2

    Given that it throws away all legacy ports, I'd say it's pretty short in USB ports. One ofr the keyboard. One for the mouse. One for the printer. So, that leaves you with exactly one USB port (I'm discounting the two USB 2.0 ones). When you throw away your old keyboard and mouse, keep around that old USB hub. You might need it. As for the three PCI slots: Video capture card, decent sound card, SCSI ports. There goes my scalability, I guess....

    Well the USB 2.0 ports are backwards compatible and the mouse can and should be chained from the keyboad so yes you have a lot of free ports.
    Most keyboards have two extra ports I use one for my mouse and one for my camera.

    As for the pci slots the onboard sound looks fine to me.
    It has optical ins for god sakes. What more do you want?
    It also has an onboard nic card and that saves you another slot.

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  37. Re:Not so many ports... by geekoid · · Score: 2

    onboard sound is traditionally, crap.
    I don't know why, it doesn't have to be. My SOYO DRAGON onboard sounds sucks hind tit.
    at least onboard nics have been getting better.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. Re:Makes you wonder by majorero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually with certain drive kits, IDE can be made to be hot swappable. Do a google search of hot swap and ide and check it out.

  39. No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2

    Excuse me, but not having PS/2 keyboard/mouse ports is totally ridiculous: come on, I have a great old keyboard (first-gen MS natural, with the 'bigger' keys) that works perfectly and is not manifactured anymore and a great Logi mouse (forget the model, not manifactured anymore either) and I would have to throw them away just to use this M/B? No way!

    And let's not even talk about my laserjet printer (which works *great* but is, obviously, parallel).

    And what's the deal with no gameport connector (for MIDI)? Why should I pay twice for the onboard sound and for a creative card to hook up my MIDI gear? Not to mention some people that have hundreds of $$ invested in non-USB HOTAS setups.

    I don't like backwards compatibility at all costs, and I like the idea of having some firewire ports and some extra USB ones (even if IMHO USB hubs are a much better idea, I can connect/disconnect things on my desk instead of having to crawl behind the computer) but removing things like keyboard/mouse connectors and parallel ports goes really too far.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by curunir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      why are PS/2 ports labeled as "legacy"?

      Because USB does everything PS/2 does in a more flexable way. It's nice to be able to hook the mouse into my keyboard or the back of the computer or even into a USB hub. Computer makers like USB because it eliminates the need to color-code everything. With PS/2, the tech on the phone always has to think, "did this moron hook the keyboard into the mouse port?"

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    2. Re:No PS/2 keyboard and mouse? no *way* by addaon · · Score: 2

      That's actually rather interesting. I accidentally plugged in everything backwards a few days ago (also a rack environment), and everything started up fine. When I noticed, several days later, the reversal, I went and checked the documentation... apparently the HP BIOS detects which port is being used for the mouse, and assigns the other to the keyboard, so you can do it either way. I can't imagine that the hardware to do this is too expensive, so I'm surprised more companies don't do it.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  40. mahgod! 12 ide channels! by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Does anyone have a mirror of the article or even some photos of this board, the review seems to be slashdotted already. I can't wait to see how they managed to cram *12* ide connectors on the mobo! But very cool all the same. Funny thing about IDE, does anyone even use the lame-o "slave" drive on each chain? With all of the controllers/connectors on modern boards, I don't know anyone that doesn't just have a single "master" drive on each channel.

    Thankfully I work with FibreChannel and SCSI at work... but with 12 IDE channels on a single board, I think I could "suffer" with IDE!!!! Schweet!

  41. Re:Huh? by JesseL · · Score: 2

    I thinks it actually somthing like 127 or 255 devices per USB port. It's hard to imagine what you'd do with that many devices sharing 11Mbps though...

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  42. Linux? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can anyone guess how successful a Linux installation would be on such a motherboard? (Without even a PS/2 keyboard port, I'm wondering if the RedHat installer would even talk to you, without a lot of hacking and customization.)

    Removing all legacy ports seems a bit silly, to me; it takes so little to provide serial and parallel ports, they're usually integrated into some other multi-purpose I/O chip these days anyway. Sure, don't bother to have the full port on the mother board (just hook up a ribbon cable to some pins, if you need to break out the port), and allow people to disable it. But completely removing it would limit it's utility to some folks. I picked up a little motherboard recently which had no ports mounted, but everything (VGA, serial, parallel, game, sound, etc.) could be hooked up via ribbon cable to a little breakout connector. Saved a lot of space on the motherboard, but still gave you the functionality you might need.

    (In fact, a lot of the same folks who would get excited about the built-in raid, are the same folks who still need serial ports to talk to routers and switches and stuff.)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Linux? by Micah · · Score: 2

      I was wondering the same thing, but I'm pretty sure Red Hat's installer will use USB keyboards. IIRC a friend of mine installed 7.0 with a USB KB. And he's a Linux newbie!

      What I'm wondering about is the onboard video, sound, and ethernet. If that all works with Linux, this thing might be in my next box (of course, that could be a while, I'm still happy with my Athlon 700).

    2. Re:Linux? by jrwyant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most BIOSes (excluding recent AMD motherboards using the 760MP chipset, as their southbridge's USB 1.1 is broken) implement a USB software stack providing 'legacy' support (read: makes software think it's the old keyboard controller at the usual IO addresses/interrupt) until the OS boots loads its own USB 1.1/2.0 stack and enumerates the devices. It's one reason why the flash chips housing the "CMOS" programming keeps getting bigger: 4MB, then 8MB, ...

    3. Re:Linux? by Cyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Being one of those people that needs a serial port to communicate to routers and switches and servers and stuff I like my systems complete. If anything they should be expanding the number of serial ports and offering a custom connection similar to USB that splits into 4 or 8 or 16 ports. You can never have enough serial ports, even if you don't use them someone else can. But what really gets me is how they preach about cutting out the old legacy stuff and then offer both USB 1.x and 2.0. Why not just offer me 8 USB 2.0 ports? Who needs 1.x? And isn't 2.x backward compatible? This looks like its all marketting hype with no real technical thought being put behind it. I hope Abit can stick around a little while longer. I loved their overclockability and I have an older athlon motherboard that's excellent! But this new stuff makes me worry about that company. Heh, integrated a/v, when will they ever learn?

    4. Re:Linux? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Looks like a normal Realtek Ethernet from the photos.

    5. Re:Linux? by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can drop legacy ports as a way of playing chicken with the hardware upgrade cycle. Apple gambled in this way when they shipped the iMac with only USB and Firewire ports; they won in that ADB, serial, and SCSI (except for the high end) devices were quickly abandoned and USB/Firewire took off. If the iMacs had been able to use legacy peripherals, USB would be dead in the water right now and Firewire would be a niche toy like fiber channel.

    6. Re:Linux? by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      FYI, Mandrake has had USB mouse & keyboard support in since 8.0 I believe, and it works better than Windows XP does. I used a USB keyboard in XP and half the time it doesn't find it, so you have to sit there unplugging and plugging the keyboard until it finds it.

    7. Re:Linux? by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Sure doesn't look like there's any onboard video in the one I'm looking at.

    8. Re:Linux? by j09824 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Removing all legacy ports seems a bit silly, to me; it takes so little to provide serial and parallel ports, they're usually integrated into some other multi-purpose I/O chip these days anyway. Sure, don't bother to have the full port on the mother board (just hook up a ribbon cable to some pins, if you need to break out the port), and allow people to disable it. But completely removing it would limit it's utility to some folks.

      I'm glad to see that stuff go. Configuration of legacy ports is a headache, and even just their presence on the motherboard is a potential pitfall. Furthermore, there is something good about making the life of people relying on them harder: it gives hardware and software vendors a reason to finally update their offerings to the new standards.

      If you really must have serial or parallel ports, USB-to-Serial and USB-to-Parallel cables work very well and are cheap.

      Can anyone guess how successful a Linux installation would be on such a motherboard? (Without even a PS/2 keyboard port, I'm wondering if the RedHat installer would even talk to you, without a lot of hacking and customization.)

      USB support is completely integrated into current Linux kernels; USB keyboards just work--there is nothing to do.

    9. Re:Linux? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      I'm glad I'm not the only one wondering why 4 serial ports isn't standard. And spaced far enough apart (or side by side) that you can use 2 25pin adapters simultaneously.

      -Paul Komarek

    10. Re:Linux? by fishebulb · · Score: 2

      ive had luck with hotplugging nonrequired deviced (webcam, visor) never tried keyboards and mice though.

    11. Re:Linux? by Wolfier · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This kind of motherboard is ideal, for OEM to make "iMac-like" "user-friendly" computers, and there is no doubt the market for this kind of motherboard will be huge. Think "set-top boxes with sealed cases".

      And...a lot of (say, more than 50% for sure) people prefer these treat-you-as-an-idiot style computers - because they ARE idiot, with respect to computers.

      I believe Abit will continue to make excellent motherboards for the rest of us. I won't be worrying too much.

    12. Re:Linux? by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      SuSE had no problem with my USB keyboard and mouse. I was suprised at that, actually, since the keyboard is an SGI and I had a hard time getting it to work in Windows.

      The one downside That I've noticed is that when KDE locks up I lose keyboard functionality, which forces me to hit the reset button instead of just killing X. Generally it's not that big of a deal, since (a) I'm rarely do anything with my computer that's actually important, and (b) I use reiserfs, but it does take some time to reboot and that's kind of annoying.

      I suspect I could probably fix it by compiling a kernel with USB not a module, but I seem to be bad at compiling kernels. I've only ever compiled one that worked, and it had support for basically nothing.

      Yes, I know it's not that hard. I don't know what's wrong with me...

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  43. Re:USB Keyboard. by greenfly · · Score: 2

    I'm not understanding what's wrong with having extra keys on the keyboard. I have my windows keys mapped to Meta and Multi_key, and it's nice to map the windows key to pop up my enlightenment menu.

    I even mapped all of the new "internet" keys on the top of my keyboard, and have a few of the set for quick access to a terminal.

  44. The venerable Mac by cluening · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, Apple got rid of legacy ports a loooooong time ago (at least in computer-time). Of course, I am still a fan of legacy ports (where would all of my cool old hardware plug in?), but this doesn't seem groundbreaking on the grand scheme of things. Heck, Sun even went all USB on their SunRay appliances. Yeah, they aren't "real computers" but still. But, alas, the world is dominated by "innovation" from Intel and Micros~1, so until they do it, it hasn't been done. (like the "first optical mouse" that Micros~1 came up with a couple years ago - what do you call the optical Sun mouse I have that has "1992" stamped on the bottom of it?)

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
    1. Re:The venerable Mac by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      "what do you call the optical Sun mouse I have that has "1992" stamped on the bottom of it?"

      I have one of those.. it requires a special mousepad to be used with it, and will only work on that mouse pad and nothing else. The MS optical mouse works on that, a normal mouse pad, a desk, your face, the cat, whatever you want. They are similar, but they are not the same. The MS optical mouse is much more useful and works better.

  45. Re:Completely useless by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    That's completely asinine. If you are running a mobo with that poor of a design, maybe you need to start spending more money on your PC parts. Most boards will let you turn off integrated components AND reclaim their reserved interupts. I'm running an older Abit with a KT133A and a built-in HighPoint 100 Raid controller. I don't need the built-in raid functions so I disabled it. I have no problems using other cards on the interrupts, as I have the ability to manually select what each IRQ and DMA is allocated to. That's a good design. It's also rock solid, only crashes when I do something retarded like boot up Win98 :-0

    One thing you are right about, built-in components cost a lot of money. More than just 5 or 10 dollars. Look at high end dual proc boards; many times the only difference between them is a nice builting SCSI raid card and $100.

    USB doesn't suck, it's more flexible. It just requires more software support and it seems the Linux USB support isn't quite *there* yet.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  46. Apple has been doing this for yeats? by Dokushoka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this innovative when apple has been including all this stuff in their mobos for quite a while now?

  47. Re:Completely useless by geekoid · · Score: 2

    no.
    A true geek plays quake, buys clothing from think geek, hangs out at /. and rant about MPAA while running out to watch LOTR.
    What you are sir, is a nerd.
    be proud, you actually know something about technology.

    It's sad that the term geek has lost all meaning, but thats what happens when something becomes "hip"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  48. Re:Completely useless by geekoid · · Score: 2

    haha, you got me there. but believe me, my spelling would not improve with a new keyboard.
    I had to re-learn how to talk when I was 6, that screwed up my spelling forever.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  49. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by Bake · · Score: 2

    Well, us Linux folks had their usb mouse detected during their last installation of RedHat 7.2, so quit yer complaining get a newer kernel.
    Hell, I was even using a usb mouse _before_ the 2.4 series.

  50. No ps2 ports - for the love of god.... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    I can almost see dropping a floppy drive, but a ps2 keyboard and mouse? I use a USB keyboard and mouse on my laptop, but it does take a fair bit more CPU cycles to use the USB version over the ps2. Mind you, a few seconds longer to boot weblogic is not a huge deal, but like those silly winmodems - why waste it on something like a keyboard and mouse? It is not like this board is headed for "almost embedded" solutions like the 170mmx170mm mainboards I plan to toss in my car.

  51. Re:Completely useless by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2

    Actually, true geeks photomask and etch their own silicon. Careful with the HF, now.

  52. Re:How about more firewire ports! by Pfhor · · Score: 2

    Actually, extra firewire ports are redundant, unless of course, you mean more firewire controllers... You can have 63 devices on a controller, you can daisy chain them without major performance issues (the only case of it not being the best idea to daisy chain em that I have heard of is when you are doing software raid, each drive on its own controller gives optimum performance).

    Considering that USB2.0 is a completely different ball park, which I know nothing about. BTW before people start saying that USB2.0 will kill firewire, remember that it is probably not going to appear in a major market anytime soon: Digital Video Cameras. Sony pretty much leads the pack in this, and the high end stuff has had them for a while (actually, before apple started the whole imovie thing).

    Still astonished that I would ever hear a pc review magazine say that 3 pci slots is not enough (after hearing them lambast apple for making machines with only 3. BTW, they have 4, 64bit, 33mhz pci slots now)

  53. No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by n6mod · · Score: 2

    This is really disappointing. Just when I thought I found the right board to replace the P2B-LS in my HTPC. But...

    Bzzzrt.

    I still need more than 3PCI slots, even with the cool I/O on this mobo.

    I need:
    HiPix Card (HD Tuner Card)
    Gig Ethernet (You try shuffling 16GB movies in HD around)
    SCSI (DDS-4 for offline storage of said HD movies)

    And it's full. No possibility of adding the next cool thing. I'd have to use an AIW if I wanted to use dScaler for DVDs, etc. etc.

    Seems like omitting SCSI and GigE were severe oversights.

    -Z

    --
    You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    1. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Easy dont buy this motherboard. This motherboard has most of the stuff a home user would need online. But 3 PCI would be pushing it, but Since my 2 of my 3 PCI cards are Ethernet and Audio (SB Audigy), it does make sense.

    2. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by n6mod · · Score: 2

      SCSI is debatable in the consumer space, I agree.

      But the argument that 1000BaseTX isn't a consumer product is entirely specious. Macs have GigE, and they're always dissed as "consumer" machines around here.

      D-Link 1000BaseTX NIC's are $40 off the shelf. There's no good reason not to use a Gig chipset anymore.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    3. Re:No 1000BaseTX, only 3 PCI by n6mod · · Score: 2

      I'd love to use the Mac, since that's where the rest of my video tools are hosted, but there's no driver support for any HDTV tuner that I know of.

      If you know of one, I'd love to know about it.

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
  54. More ports! More ports! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I agree that this board seems to make a fetish of overkill. But you're not thinking things through when you assume that hubs are always a good substitute for ports.
    • Cables are a pain. Cutting back on them is a key USB feature. Hubs means extra cabling, especially if you have a lot of USB-powered devices, and thus need to get powered hubs.
    • Hubs share bandwidth, they don't create it. Suppose you own a half-dozen Rio Riots and want to download them all at once? (Unlikely scenario? What else would you do with a terabyte of disk space!)
    • Some storage devices don't work with shared ports. Or rather they work, but you risk scrambling them when another device grabs the port at a crucial moment.
    • There's something called "USB conflict" where the devices screw each other up because their manufacturers skimped on USB standard compliance. Usual workaround is to rearrange who shares with who -- a lot easier to do if you have more than the usual 2 ports.
  55. Re:Makes you wonder by freakinPsycho · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sure, there's not much difference in price.. really..

    Check out pricewatch, here's a sample:

    ~40 gig
    Scsi: $124
    IDE: $54

    ~80 gig
    scsi: $443
    IDE: $90

    160 gig IDE: $197
    $180 gig SCSI: $999

    Nope, not much price difference there.

    I want a lot of storage space, so I bought a mobo with onboard raid. This is not so that I can quickly access a large amount of information, but so that I have somewhere to store all kinds of crap (MP3's, etc).

    I also use the extra IDE slots so that I can have more stuff in there (DVD rom, cd-jutebox, CD-RW, windows drive, BSD drive, etc).

    I'm not going for speed, I'm going for bulk. So yeah, I could upgrade to SCSI. I'd spend a crap-load of money and not really gain anything, since I don't do anything that is IO heavy. Everything I do is CPU/Memory heavy. SCSI doesn't help me there.

    SCSI has its place, but I don't need it. I'm happy with my ability to stick a bunch of IDE drives into my computer and play with it like that. I have a board with 4 IDE channels, 2 1/2 of which I use. I don't need SCSI.

    --
    "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
    - Alexandar Woolcot
  56. Re:You too, idiot. by zbuffered · · Score: 2

    BTW, they're just selling the motherboard, not the case.
    +1 - Zing!

    --
    Synergy is your friend
  57. Re:Completely useless by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    Hey, if you can make your PII 250 work as good as my Athlon 1.4, THEN maybe I have some learning to do.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  58. Re:I think they're smoking ABIT of crack over ther by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    So go write some decent USB drivers for Linux, and GPL them so the non-coder g33ks can have some fun!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  59. USB absolutely uses DMA by Johannes · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know where you're getting your information, but all 3 common USB host controllers (UHCI, OHCI and EHCI) use bus mastering DMA to transfer the data from the device to main memory.

    Go check the USB host controller specs for yourself.

  60. Review has a lot of marketing cruft by piranha(jpl) · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This article seems sort of biased and heavy on the marketing hype. Here are my repsonses to a few notable things written in the article.

    Windows 2000/XP/ME only. Win98 users need not apply. [page 1; image caption]

    For what reasons is Windows 98 not supported? For the same reasons as Windows 98 won't run, will {Linux,{Free,Net,Open}BSD} be affected? They do not go into any detail on this whatsoever.

    It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old Dexxa ball mouse that came with your first SVGA card. While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off! Abit steps into a new era of computing with the MAX boards. [page 1]

    What's wrong with my old ball mouse? It works. Why should PS/2 keyboards and mice be replaced by USB? It seems overkill, especially for keyboards, where things should always work, even if your OS is having problems seeing your USB controller. With USB, too many things can break, and leave your system in a hard-to-fix state. (Ever added 'usb-uhci' instead of 'usb-ohci' to /etc/modules, or equivalent? Many OSs don't have USB support in the installer; Debian doesn't at least, and I don't think any of the BSDs do. Does the BIOS emulate an AT interface for USB keyboards?) More importantly, new eras of computing have little to do with shedding "legacy" devices. New eras of computing are set in software ideology and design. Even as far as hardware goes, new eras of computing would be more akin to a next generation of processor, or a new archetecture in CPUs or busses enabling more than 16 IRQ lines. That last sentence seems very marketroid.

    Despite having all the next-gen high performance capabilities, SCSI is still absent. This proves that while the AT7 is a very high end board, it is still targeted to the consumer market. Thanks, Abit! [page 1; bottom]

    The "consumer" market doesn't use 12 IDE devices. The high-end hobbyist/server/gaming markets do. I think it's a shame they left out SCSI, which seems inconsistent with trying to shed "legacy devices". SCSI is great. Why are you thanking them?

    Included are a set of nifty black IDE cables ... This is a great way to have some nice looking custom IDE cables without worrying about using rounded cables (IDE cables are flat for a reason you know!). [page 2]

    I use rounded cables (that I make myself) to improve airflow and increase the ease of routing/positioning cables inside my cases. I don't care about how they look. And no, I didn't know of a reason IDE cables are flat, besides conventional manufacturing techniques in use. Too bad you don't explain why, because the first thing I'd do with these cables is use a razor blade to slice them into segments, and bunch the segments together with zip-ties, as I would any other flat cable.

    It is expected that most cases will start using MediaXP panels, rather than their own Mickey Mouse panels you see now. [page 2; bottom]

    Uh huh. I take it these MediaXP panels are specific to Abit and their licensees. How much are you being paid by Abit again?

    Gee, it sure looks like a big gain in performance, but this is like comparing dog poo to cat poo...
    Ugh I can't bear to look at that... Let's get to the OpenGL numbers...
    [page 6; bottom]

    Comparing "dog poo to cat poo"? Maybe you meant comparing apples and oranges. "Ugh"? The reviewer seems to have come straight from the AOL chat rooms... Okay, so I say "ugh" from time to time, but you don't use that word in a written review. That's fairly unprofessional.

    One more gripe, but somewhat offtopic: at the bottom of every page, I'm told to use IE 5+ and a 1024x768x32-bit screen. There is no excuse for bad web design that depends on a specific browser configuration like this. </pissyrant>

  61. Sounds like a Mac by xixax · · Score: 2

    OK, this is a neat board, (10 EIDE devices and 6 USB!) but look at what the current Mac has had for a while:

    2 x Firewire
    4 x USB (2 on the keyboard)
    4 x PCI
    Modem
    Gigabit Ether
    Audio
    Video
    (Airport) (currently optional)

    See ADB or DB25 SCSI anyywhere there?

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  62. Re:Completely useless by threephaseboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to mention that I have yet to see a 10/100-base-T ISA ethernet card that could actually compete with a PCI card, and lets not forget 1000BT..

    --
    .
  63. Re:Stability by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    By the Big Power Switch do you mean the one on your case or the one on your Power Supply?

    Only because, I don't care how Borg it is, there's no way it should be able to stay on when you turn the power supply off.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  64. Magic bandwidth! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    you don't have to deal with SHARED bandwidth
    You mean two firewire devices on the same port don't share bandwidth? Amazing!
  65. 10 USB devices, hrm. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's funny, my motherboard can support 256 USB devices. I think what they mean as that the mobo has a build in hub.

    Most people won't use more then four or five USB devices. Whats really cool here is the firewire.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  66. Re:Makes you wonder by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the difference between the newest IDE and the newest SCSI is far more then marginal.

    That's right,- at least if you are talking about the price tag.

    188 GB SCSI: $999,-
    160 GB IDE: 197,-

    And God help you if you want to access more then 2 devices at a time.

    Exactly why it is nice to have a board with more than 2 IDE controllers. As long as you hook all devices to their own controller, there's no problem accessing more than 2 devices, which you should know, I know as someone who just finished writing a UltraDMA driver for a custom OS.

    If you don't believe me, go ahead and compare a 3.9 ms SCSI drive to a 3.9ms IDE drive..oh wait, they don't exist.

    And this is where a RAID controller kicks in.

    So take your SCSI elitism and buy your drive for 5 times what it should cost. All the best.

  67. Re:Stability by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

    indeed.

    I've sworn off Abit boards for the moment. but I'll give them credit where it's due, they REALLY do know how to lay out a board sensibly.

    If only they could build them properly too. :/

  68. Re:Huh? by Johannes · · Score: 2, Informative

    127 devices per USB bus. This thing has atleast 3 busses.

    The USB 1.1 bus is 11Mbps (per bus), whereas the USB 2.0 bus is 480Mbps.

  69. Re:Completely useless by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

    A $15 ps/2 -> usb dongle. Keep your old Model-M -- or, in my case, my $250 Kinesis Classic. PS/2 was a shitty stupid idea when it was introduced, and it's no less stupid now. I'm happy to see it go away.

    (jfb)

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  70. comment summary by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) This board sucks! How am I supposed to connect my [10 year old piece of hardware] when there isn't a [PS2/Serial/Parallel/AT/ISA/Microchannel] [port/slot]?!?!? This can't POSSIBLY be for people building a new computer from the ground up, because, dammit, that's not what I do, so obviously no one else does either! And speaking of [10 year old piece of hardware], aren't I so 1337 for still using it? I thought so.

    2) [SCSI/IDE] rocks! [IDE/SCSI] sucks!

    3) Natalie Portman pours hot grits down my pants. Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  71. MediaXP? by RovingSlug · · Score: 2

    What exactly is it? I know the review briefly described it, but I was looking for something more detailed. Googling for "MediaXP" doesn't return any significant hits. What's up?

  72. I'll Pay Extra for PS/2 by MBCook · · Score: 2

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I have tried many USB devices. I have a MS Intellimouse Explorer that can be USB or PS/2, and a MS Natural Keyboard Pro that can also be USB or PS/2. My grand master plan a while ago was to get rid of some of the legacy stuff in my PC so that I wouldn't have so many cables in the back, makeing it easier to make it look better, to unplug for upgrades, etc. Well, I tried it for about 1 day and went back to PS/2. Why? Because the thing I use my PC for more than anything else is gaming, and I could notice the delay in response between a USB keyboard and mouse and having them on the PS/2 ports, even when they were the only USB devices in the system. If I had the bios make them act like PS/2 devices, instead of windows, it was still noticeable. 100+ FPS in games like Quake 3 and Counter Strike is useless if your mouse/kb doesn't update fast or consistantly. Sure, when I need a mouse on my laptop, USB is great. When I need to borrow my mom's color ink jet instead of our network attached laser printer, it's great too. But when I need fast response time for killing that AWP whore, I'll take PS/2 any day. Frankly, I'm disappointed in USB, I'm still waiting for it to make my life easier.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:I'll Pay Extra for PS/2 by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Never mind gaming, such a lag from the mouse or keyboard in everyday use would drive me off my flip. I *notice* that sort of lag even in ordinary typing of text.

      And likewise, I just don't feel an overwhelming urge to replace all my peripherals ... SCSI scanner, parallel laserjet, Belkin KVM switch -- that's another $600+ right there. And if I want a dozen IDE drives, PCI RAID cards are about $30 each.

      I agree with those who've said yeah, it's consumer-cool for those who are buying all new from scratch, but it's not so great for the rest of us.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  73. Re:Completely useless by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    I agree with you. Often onboard sound chips cause problems with linux even though they can be turned off in the BIOS. It'd be nice to just have a motherboards with a bunch of pci ports and a bunch of usb ports.

  74. Re:Completely useless by TampaTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And, no, sometimes you can't just turn these features off in the BIOS. Even worse, sometimes there's no way to reclaim the IRQs that are lost due to integrated functions! Check out some of the really bad implementations out there. It's a nightmare trying to make those poorly designed boards work.

    <RANT>
    I have to concur on this. My dad bought a Soyo K7V Dragon Plus! with onboard RAID. I configured the RAID and everything was working flawlessly until one day the RAID JUST STOPPED WORKING! It decided that the 2nd drive just was not connected. I wasted a whole weekend and lost a lot of data trying to get it working again. A week later my Dad noticed a little blurb in the documentation about not putting a SCSI card in PCI slot 2 because the IRQ on that slot is shared with the RAID. Well, there was no SCSI card in slot 2, but as it turns out the RAID broke(i didn't realize it at the time) right after I rearranged some PCI cards and ended up putting a FireWire card in slot 2. NICE F#$%#KING design, slot 2 is completly useless on that board if you are using RAID. What good are all these features if they don't WORK TOGETHER?
    </RANT>

  75. This is a server, not a Gamerz box. by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Yes, you've got to use a USB keyboard and mouse instead of your current one, and you'll miss the grooves you've warning into the plastic obsessing on your favorite games, but you didn't buy a box with 12 IDE drives to use the for gaming! You bought it to be a server or movie production studio, or you bought it to build your own Tivo, and it's going to sit under the table and connect to your old machine by Ethernet or Wireless.

    Modern "legacy-free" computers work just fine with USB keyboards and mice, and if you don't like new mice, get a USB-to-serial converter to support your antique Logitech. The Firewire and USB2 mean you can plug in fast external devices, either inputs like video cameras or storage devices, and and as a bonus you can refill your MP3 player from the 3 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS MP3s it can hold :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  76. Re:Completely useless by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    If you had ever tried to build your own little hobbyist PCB shop, you'd either be laughing at how stupid your statement just sounded, or crying that it's out of your reach. Damn, what I wouldn't give, to be able to mask even 8k roms.

  77. Re:Completely useless by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

    I don't think so - I rather have intergrated components - as long as they work well (which in the case of my A7V-266E they do). For one thing it saves a whole lot of time and headache - because you know they tested it and its going to work most of the time.

    Not to mention this board - you can just buy it, plop a video card and a hard disk drive and your done - pc built :).

  78. Re:your board by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2
    the board you picked up with no ports and ribbion options. where did you get whats its name and how much
    It was actually sold as an upgrade card by PowerLeap, but it's an upgrade card that requires you disconnect power from your motherboard; the motherboard becomes just a holder for the new single board computer, in effect.

    So their reasoning for having the jumpered-out ports is a little different; so you can plumb in the upgrade card to an old PC. But the effect is good for those who choose to use it as a single board computer :-)

    The unit is pretty amazing; it has 3D graphics, sound, up to 1G memory, 1ghz procsesor, sound, game port, three serial, parallel, PS/2 mouse & keyboard, *four* USB, dual IDE, and probably some other goodies I'm forgetting. All on a PCI card sized unit.

    The pricing was very good; check out powerleap's store for details. (Mine was the 370S.)

    (Mine actually came with a broken CPU fan, but they assure me a new one is en-route.) I'll probably do up a review for /. once I get Linux fired up on it (and make a new newsworthy custom case for it; let's see, maybe popsicle sticks...)
    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  79. Fan on the chipset by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    Wow, there's a fan on the KT333 chipset! I'd think with all the legacy stuff they removed, they wouldn't need a fan. The KT333 actually still has all the legacy functionality in it which might be why they need the fan.

  80. Re:Makes you wonder by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Should have spent an extra $20, and got a fibrer channel adapter on ebay.

    It supports 127 devices without getting fancy, and 65,000 or so, if you have the cash for decent FC hubs or switches.

    $1 per gig, for smaller drives. Some hubs are under $300 on ebay. 200mps of bandwidth. You can use STP cat5.

    I am to you, what you are to these weenies getting hardons over IDE... I am Ubergeek.

  81. Why the PCI slots? by Animats · · Score: 2

    Most people don't use them, and they make the board and box far bigger. A no-slot version would be useful for a little-box-under-the-flatpanel-monitor form factor.

  82. Scary. by maikeru · · Score: 2, Funny

    An excerpt from Abit's MAX FAQ:

    WHAT IS MAX?

    Charlie, lead designer of the AT7: "I'm glad you asked me that. MAX is a mother board with a legacy-free device interface, maximized CPU performance and memory capacity, on-board LAN, 6 Channel Audio, USB 2.0 and IEEE1394a..."

    MAX: "Blah, blah, blah. Anybody can tell that by reading the specsheet! I'm more than a bunch of interfaces and memory slots! Without tooting my own horn, I'm everything anybody could possibly ever want in a computing system. I'm like the beautiful girlfriend you've always wanted who also cooks, cleans, mows the lawn, pays the bills AND lets you play CS all night-- if that's what you want."

    Charlie: "Well, I guess you could put it that way..."

    BUT WHY MAX?

    Charlie: "Good question. MAX fully utilizes system bandwidth and provides the best storage management currently available in a motherboard. Combine that with all the fully integrated extra features, and you have the ultimate integrated computer platform."

    MAX: "Charlie, We know that already. What people want to know is why would they want MAX. Well, the answer is, `cause I'll make your life easier, giving you more time to spend at the beach, or playing MOH: AA till your wrist seizes up and your brain melts."

    Charlie: "We didn't think of that whenwe included all the integrated extra features, but I suppose you're right."

    MAX: "Of course I'm right! I'm ABIT Engineered!"

    Charlie: "Before MAX interrupted me, I was going to mention that MAX users will have the best platform solution in the market, with the best design for users thanks to ABIT Engineering. Because MAX includes just about all the integrated features users will need in a motherboard, MAX is designed for now and the future."

    MAX: "That's right Charlie. I'm gonna be around for a long time...like Gandalf."



    All I can say is: Wow. That's the most horrible thing I've ever read.

  83. The big prob with built-in stuff on the mobo... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    I have an i810-based computer, and currently am using the on-board audio. Thing is, there is so much crosstalk from other devices on the motherboard like the IDE lines and so on that unless you are pumping high-volume sound around you still hear little subtle pings and hisses.

    I have heard that with the Nforce-based all-in-one motherboards the problem has pretty much been licked. However, I will not believe it until I hear it with my own ears.

    Meanwhile, I'm saving my pennies for an Audigy... unless Turtle Beach comes out with an audio card with a firewire port on it.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  84. Reclaiming interrupts? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2
    What I want to know most is if you will be able to use this thing to reclaim interrupts which are usually used for PS/2 keyboard (IRQ2, I think), serial 1 (IRQ4) and 2 (IRQ3) and parallel port (often IRQ7).

    IRQ12, which is usually for the PS/2 Mouse, is probably the only interrupt that can be reclaimed. IRQ5 can probably be used by the on board sound.

    If you can't reclaim the resources, then dropping the connectors on the back is a step backwards, not a step forwards. And they probably can't reclaim the IRQ's because it would break compatibility with everything out there.

    Cryptnotic

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Reclaiming interrupts? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      That's really an ironic question, considering IRQs were also supposed to be rendered obsolete some while back!! Didn't quite work out that way, did it? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  85. No parallel port by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think PC's lose their usefulness without paralle ports. If your trying to interface some simpel device you've made who wants to bother with USB interfaces and UARTs and stuff. Just read and write to the memory mapped parallel port. Its so easy! whay would I do with this?
    I suppose not buy it, but still. . .

  86. Re:When Apple did this, they laughed... by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    What kind of devices use the 64bit slots?

    64 bit is very handy when more than one PCI slot is sharing a PCI bus... most PC and Mac mobos only have one PCI bus, shared by 3-5 slots. GigE NICs, SCSI cards, lab/data acquisition boards, uncompressed HD video interface cards, etc... most high end, high-thruput PCI cards have 64-bit and/or 66 MHz options to take advantage of wider (64-bit) or faster (66 MHz) busses. Heard the buzz about PCI-X? Just a fancy name for 64-bit, 133 MHz PCI that's starting to become popular on server boards.

  87. Re:Makes you wonder by shyster · · Score: 2
    RAID SCSI doesn't rock? Why does a consumer even need raid?

    Of course RAID SCSI rocks! The price is outrageous for the performance, however. And consumers don't need the added reliability of a SCSI drive, or hot swap, RAID 5, etc. But, since the HDD is still the slowest part of a modern system, it only makes sense to increase the performance of it.

    if you are serious enough about HD speed to learn RAID, then you should be going SCSI.

    Learn RAID? What's there to learn? We're not talking rocket science or programming here....Increases speed, can increase reliability, does away with different drive letters for smallish drives...what's not to love?

    really, this is just an expensice way to try to get the advantages of SCSI.

    No, SCSI is just an expensive way to get the advantages of IDE-RAID. SCSI RAID is an extremely expensive way to blow some serious cash. In a consumer environment, at least. SCSI in midrange servers is, IMO, a requirement.

  88. Re:Makes you wonder by shyster · · Score: 2
    Um, have you noticed how expensive tape backup units are? The only practical way for people to protect themselves from drive failure is to raid. It's not speed, it's redundancy. I've raided my home system ever since a (scsi) drive failure took out a (luckily unimportant) partition. I've also gone ide because the scsi upgrades were just too expensive.

    Good point. TBU's are pretty outrageous, especially when you start looking at backing up today's monstrous hard drives to a single tape (or autoloader). IDE tape drives are more reasonably priced, though. I can't say I'd recommend them though. They're a good bit slower and more prone to failure than SCSI units, in my experience.

    Lucky for me, I get to keep old TBU's from customers. :) I use 1 DDS-2 (10/20GB) and 1 DDS-3 (12/24GB) SCSI TBU's to back myself up, so I can use RAID for performance and still not worry too much.

  89. I do. by acoustix · · Score: 2

    AGP = TNT2
    PCI 1 - DVD decoder
    PCI 2 - Sound Card
    PCI 3 - Ultra ATA controller
    PCI 4 - Capture card
    PCI 5 - NIC
    PCI 6 - Modem

    All cards working fine, thank you very much. It's not hard to do. If you can't fill 6 PCI slots and get the cards working correctly then I would wonder about your actual computer knowledge.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  90. Abit KR7a Memory issues - May also by ghazban · · Score: 2

    The Abit KR7a with 4 RAM slots has ram issues which cause it to give memtest86 errors. This has been hypothesised to be caused by the non-standard amount of ram slots. This was a huge source of grief for me, and I eventually returned the board and had to get credit for the store. As this board also has 4 RAM slots, I would watch out for this board. I will never buy Abit products again because of their extremely high RMA rate.
    Please follow this link for details on the problem.

  91. This isn't flamebait because dammit, it's TRUE... by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    http://www.lowendpc.com/

    Or if you want to see the true low-end hardcore:
    http://www.lowendmac.com/

    I have nothing but admiration for people who keep old machines alive, particularly when they spread their technological wealth around. Which reminds me: I will be decommissioning one of my machines soon. It was built in 1997 and was a real science experiment, hence the name it's held on my network, "Dexter." In fact, I brought the case cover to a comic convention and Genndy Tartakovsky drew his mad scientist character on it and autographed it for good measure.

    Dexter has been useful for all these years, and it's only because I have some new stuff coming in that I have to reluctantly decommission it. I'm keeping an eye out for a deserving new home for the thing. The scanner is going out the door too...it's an UMAX 600P and it is not supported in any OS beyond 98SE. SANE doesn't support it and UMAX doesn't make a 2K or XP driver for it either. It also barfs if connected to a computer with a processor that runs at or above 300MHz. Timing prob. Still works like a champ, too.

    This machine will be going to the Pacoima Community Center or somewhere else deserving.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  92. On a related note; by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

    Does anybody know of any GOOD front mount USB devices for a 5.25" bay? I DO NOT WANT one that includes a 5.25" to 3.5" adaptor, I have ENOUGH 3.5" bays in my full tower case, I just want to be able to plug in massive USB devices to the front of my computer. . . .

    Bleh.

    :(

    The ONLY solution to this problem that I have been able to figure out so far would be to mount a regular old USB hub in one of the bays with some screws and some very careful drilling into the Hub itself (I have found some Hubs that are of about the right size and would fit in a 5.25" bay just nicely) but this is far from optimal. . . .

    I mean WTF am I supposed to do with a shitpot load of USB ports AND NO DAMN WAY TO ACCESS THEM. Well except for from behind my case, but already I have WAAAY to many wires back there and it is a royal pain in the arse to have to reach back around behind my computer and try and grope for something remotly resembling a USB port to plug some device in to. . . . It would be nice to be able to actualy see the port. ^_^

  93. How about a BIOS revolution? by Wolfier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Argh. So many "legacy" ports got rid of...nice.
    Now, how about updating the bios, so that ALL the old ports are emulated? To the extent that DOS 5.0 will still install from scratch and run?

    Having a USB device is nice, but HARDWARE IS HARDWARE. They should function all by themselves with only the BIOS (think "safe mode"), and not only when some OS-supplied drivers are run.

    How else do people fix things when the drivers break?

    1. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Upgrade to the next version of Windows.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      Why are you spending your $ on a new MB so you can run DOS5?

    3. Re:How about a BIOS revolution? by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Getting rid of the "legacy" 16-bit BIOS gives you no benefit at all. The software's already there, and it costs nothing to put it there. It's only 256KB.

      The ability to treat your PC as some "great IBM PC AT in the sky" is essential in case something breaks, and you'll have something to fall onto - I'm assuming that the BIOS never breaks, which is often the case as they're burnt in Flash ROM, not written to some wimpy device like a hard drive. It is the assumption of Windows "safe mode".

      Which I really like to have on Linux - being able to fall back on the 16-bit BIOS-based "drivers" would be VERY useful for driver developers, and for hardware that a driver isn't written for yet.

      Isn't it great? I know if I want to I can make a DOS program that uses the GeForce3 pixel shaders - you just need to know about their register addresses and stuffs.

      ---------------
      Karma: 50. Please don't bother modding...

  94. Re:electronics enthuisist by Harumuka · · Score: 2

    BeyondLogic has information on programming USB. It's more difficult than serial, but if you really want to program serial/parallel it's a good idea to get a hold of a port replicator. I had one from PortSmith that turned a USB port into serial, parallel, and PS/2 ports. Worked great, I would have used it if I didn't have all this legacy junk on my system.

    --
    What do you think of MusicCity now?
  95. Unless You'd Like the Added Peace of Mind of ECC by dmelomed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They claim they support ECC SDRAM, but they don't. Their motherboards run ECC SDRAM, but don't actually use the ECC hardware. See http://cr.yp.to/hardware/abit.html

  96. Re:Completely useless by Reziac · · Score: 2

    I *do* know what an AST Rampage is, and trust me, you're better off if you never have to find out! :)

    For the younger set, it was a memory card of the XT and 286 era, that with a matching driver provided an early version of EMS. In the days of memory chips socketed on the motherboard (generally 512k or 640k, but sometimes as much as 4mb), that's how you got beyond a given mobo's onboard memory limit. Most such cards were 8bit, tho high-end models were 16bit. They typically used very slow memory chips (up to 200ns).

    I have a BocaRAM card in my (t)rusty 286, to total a whopping 3 megs of RAM. :)

    And don't feel bad, I'm typing this on a lowly P233, and it works just fine too.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  97. Re:Completely useless by Reziac · · Score: 2

    [laughing] After reading this thread, I am REAL tempted to break out my XT (yes, I still own a working XT), install NetTamer on it, and post to Slashdot that way. :)

    To some degree, you're right -- the real test of geekdom is the ability to make stuff WORK, even old stuff if that's the current need. And sometimes the old stuff works BETTER -- but we've gotten used to the cranks of the new stuff and have forgotten how simple it was to merely move a jumper instead of argue with a PnP device that has weird ideas about what resources it wants to hog, and can't be taught different.

    To quote an old saw -- There are two kinds of fools: The first says "This is old, and therefore good." The second says "This is new, and therefore better."

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  98. Re:Completely useless by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    To be honest, I've yet to get one right. But ferric chloride is the scapegoat I'm using. That, and etchant tanks, seriously looking at building a spray etcher, with persulfate.

    Won't hurt when I have proper copper electroplating tanks, so that I can do real vias.

    Or a proper cnc drill.

    Or a laminator, so that I can do pretty soldermasks.

    Or a press, so that I can do multilayer.

    I just need to win the lottery, that's all.

  99. Re:Completely useless by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Amen. Geeks suck. I'm sick and tired of hearing about "geeks" who are great people because they can do drugs and get laid like all the other idiots on campus. I'd much rather be a sober nerd who can integrate the equations in the back of the book, and who gets married to the first woman he lays.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  100. No. of USB Ports overstated by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Overstated, because, even with 4 USB 1.1 ports, when you take out the PS/2 ports, then your mouse and keyboard will inevitably go into one of those, bringing the number down to 2.

  101. kernel compile time? by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    One thing I hate about these supposed hardware sites is the lack of kernel compile times. Lets face it GCC is the best benchmark tool ever made. Period the end, indisputable... you cannot argue that! Anyways... I sure would like to see a real benchmark site one of these days. I'm sure they exist, but I don't' see those listed on /. very much. I did notice the raid chip doesn't support level 5, but does support 0+1 raid.. and that actual faster, but more expensive to get into. Oh well... I guess we should all expect to replace our old serial keyboards with the new serial keyboards (aka USB, etc..). My SGI boxes at work all have USB terminal connects... when will the rest of the hardware world catch up?

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  102. USB Mice by TellarHK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly, I can't stand USB mice. I do like my USB keyboard, but every time I use the USB mouse under high load, my pointer gets laggy. To heck with that. I'd vastly prefer legacy for at least that -one- peripheral where the responsiveness of an interrupt driven input device is actually meaningful.

  103. Re:Completely useless by agallagh42 · · Score: 2

    Gotta love Asus. I had an MSI K7T266 Pro2 die on me after two months. Just replaced it with an Asus A7V333-R. Hopefully it'll last as long as my old P2B-S did (4 years and still going).

    This new asus is pretty sweet too. Most of the good parts of this Abit board (4 USB1.1, 4 USB2.0, 1 FireWire, 2 IDE, 2 IDE RAID, 5.1 sound), and still has 2 PS/2, 2 serial, 1 parallel, and 5 PCI slots.

    --
    Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  104. Re:Completely useless by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    Actually, I think that is the board. I've had it for two or three years now. Works flawlessly. With updated Via 4in1 drivers for Win98, it works great under windows. Unfortunately, I'm bound to Windows because of work. I have to use SolidWorks and 3dStudio Max 4, both Windows only.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  105. Re:Completely useless by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    Hotplugging is very important. It's one of the most touted features of USB. It works most of the time.

    My only really serious problem was getting my Epson 777 usb printer to work. I tried newsgroups, and getting support but I couldn't make it work. It's a nice printer, with built-in support for text. That's why I thought it was weird that it wouldn't work, because even set up as a generic text printer, it still wouldn't work. Oh well...

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  106. Work Ethic by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really don't understand why they introduced the PS/2 mouse interface at all..

    So that people would pay more attention when plugging in their mice and keyboards. In the old days, people just reached around and plugged 'em in by feel. This made computer guys look bad, because easy == lazy == bad.

    So they changed it so that your chances are a cointoss unless your turn the machine around and look at the damned colors or shine a light on it. Hard == hard working == good.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  107. The REAL problem is the use of a VIA chipset by Chas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    YES, VIA may have the best performance for the Athlon platform right now.

    And YES, the VIA chipset boards would be slightly cheaper than nForce boards with similar bells and whistles.

    But nobody, and I mean NOBODY but the true DIY masochists WILLINGLY put up with a VIA chipset!

    Their service history of the last few chipsets can't exactly be described as "rock solid" here.

    k around the hardware message boards for a while. Look at the people who are having problems with their Athlon-based systems. The top three problems are:

    1. User/Builder Error.
    2. Dead component
    3. Issues with a VIA chipset

    Now don't get me wrong. Other chipsets have their own issues as well. But how many of the chipset makes have the high running tally of problems that VIA has had?

    I, and many other builders, ESPECIALLY those building for other people's systems, would rather pay a little bit more, and settle for slightly lower performance than deal with a VIA product.

    VIA simply needs to work on improving their track record for a while before any serious builders are comfortable with them again.

    Fool me once, shame on you.

    Fool me twice, shame on ME!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  108. They got rid of the wrongs stuff by line-bundle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They should have gotten rid of the floppy port and the IDE (use scsi).

    The board is not as big a leap as apple made in the iMac.

  109. Re:Makes you wonder by freeweed · · Score: 2

    as posted in a reply below:

    pricewatch: ide 75gb $138 scsi 73.5 gb $443

    nuff said in my books.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  110. Re:Completely useless by Reziac · · Score: 2
    I still own one of the original Compaq "luggables" -- serial #1555. It was originally built as a dual-floppy PC clone, then upgraded to an XT clone (a 10 megabyte hard drive, twice the size of the 5 MB drives in IBM XT's at the time).

    Wow, that's just about a certifiable antique! And was probably a honkin' screamer in its day, too.

    I was trying to find my XT a good home (10MHz, 60mb of HD space, VGA -- Trident 8900 ISA cards work fine in an 8bit slot -- and it even knows the right year!) but just as well there were no takers -- while back I needed it to beta-test a fix-util for an old program that's still in wide use. And it's kinda cool to have at least one working system from every major hardware era, eh? :)

    I know a guy who still uses his old luggable CP/M machine, because he can't find a more-recent replacement for one particular program that he can't live without.

    Personally, I hate to throw out working hardware, no matter how outdated. Besides, old parts sometimes come in handy -- I support several folk with old machines and no money, and they're gradually using up my stock of ancient components. :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  111. Cost effective? Let's compare. by Chas · · Score: 4, Informative

    IDE

    160GB x 12 = 1920GB (1.920TB) (Due to HD reporting, it'll actually be about 1.788TB for real.)

    Disk System Price: $2400

    Options?

    1. The 160GB disks are only 5400rpm and have 2MB cache. Drop to 120GB disks and you can get a 7200rpm disk with 8MB of cache.
    2. Use the IDE RAID

    SCSI

    181.6 x 30 = 5448GB (5.448 TB) (Due to HD reporting, it'll actually be about 5.073TB for real.)

    Disk System Price: $30,230 (With DC controller.)

    Options?

    1. The 181.6GB disks are 7200rpm (albeit with 16MB cache). You can drop to the 72/73GB disks and get 10K and 15K disks for half than HALF the price. Even though said drives will probably only mount half the cache, the average seek times will be approximately HALF that of the higher capacity drive.
    2. Buy a DC SCSI >B>RAID controller instead of just a standard SCSI controller.

    Basically, it all REALLY depends on what you want to do with the system. That and take a look at any of the recent comparisons between SCSI and IDE drives (especially the aforementioned 120GB WesDig JB drives).

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  112. Re:IDE? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

    It really depends on your needs.

    Fast, cheap, (pretty) reliable.

    http://www.bedford.smythco.com/storage/

    43Megs/sec write, 128 Megs/sec read. 1.9TB. With IDE. 1/3rd the cost of SCSI. We built two of them for extra reliability and still saved money over SCSI. Even if a whole unit fails, we are still up and running.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  113. Abit's GPL violations by KjetilK · · Score: 2

    I just wondered if anybody knows more about what it came to with Abit's allegded GPL violations. And their Gentus Linux is dead isn't it?

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  114. Where's the H??? by rcs1000 · · Score: 2

    Quoth the review:
    It is FINALLY time to get rid of that old mouse... While you're at it, toss out that old Dot Matrix printer, and even the $13 keyboard with the ASDFJKL: keys completely rubbed off!

    Aaarggghhh. If your keyboard doesn't have an H, it's probably time to upgrade!

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
  115. Re:Completely useless by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    What's a motherboard to you? A RAM bank, CPU slot, anda PS/2 port so you can enter the programs to be run?

    You've just ranted about how you love 1993 motherboards. So, here's a tip: enjoy your 486. Nowadays, people can integrate extra functionality into a motherboard easily because the manufacturing process is so great. Granted, this has some bad effects (active cooling on the northbridge, usually by way of a cheap fan which fails after a couple months of serwice), but it's better overall for everyone.

    Business and most home users don't have to buy expensive cards with features they'll never use to get audio beyond the stupid PC speaker (do you not like how the PC speaker is on every system as well?). USB is a standard, and it's a well implemented standard which lets me easily swap devices around while going between my main work computer and whatever other computer's on the bench without an expensive KVM. Do that with PS/2 without frying some ports. Oops, PS/2's not hotplugable by design! Hov about firewire? Do you have having high speed tranfers? Do you prefer the slow and limited lpt ports instead? Or are those too "damned useless" and shouldn't also be integrated?

    Have you looked into a 1993 PC? A mess of cables from all the parts and port headers. A minimum of 4 expansion cards (NIC, sound, video, lpt/serial), and a cost more than any integrated board.

    USB is great. Firewire is great. Everything should be hotpluggable on a PC, like it is on a mainframe. It's easier to manage, and easier to fix. Open, large cases with well laid out boards and no nest of wires everywhere. It's a joy to work on.

    PS/2 ports just take up backplane space, ditto for the other legacy ports. Except for my main PC, I don't want to spend another 200$ to add sound when I can get a low-cost, general purpose, industry standard sound output from it with an onboard chip.

    If the market for such boards wasn't great, I'm sure that they wouldn't be out.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  116. Re:Completely useless by QuietRiot · · Score: 2
    Seems it might pay sometime to RTFM. You could have saved you and your dad a lot of time, trouble and data.....

    I know - Hindsight is usually pretty damn good - but it's a good point to be made - in general. Be farmiliar with what your dealing with in order to set it up and diagnose properly.

    True, sucky design, but you should have known.

  117. USB - firewire adaptor/hub? by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    USB uses ALOT of cpu usage... is there any sort of usb hub that connects to the computer via a firewire port? firewire deals with devices by itself - no cpu interaction required. by having a usb hub/router on firewire, the hub/router could deal with all that w/o using up precious cpu cycles.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  118. Re:Completely useless by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    Think of how much more stable the motherboards would be if there were less chips present and less IRQs being shared.

    Uh... you realize that most of the things you just whinged about are all on ONE chip, right? USB, IDE, and sound are all integrated into the south bridge of modern chipsets. The only thing you have to do is throw down traces (and maybe a few pots/resistors) to the physical connector.

    As for IRQ sharing - gee... funny thing there... serial, parallel, and PS/2 ports all take up a IRQ each. USB takes up one. Period. Of course, the flip side is that IDE still sucks up an IRQ per channel, so I doubt there's any less IRQ sharing going on with this particular board.

    And, no, sometimes you can't just turn these features off in the BIOS. Even worse, sometimes there's no way to reclaim the IRQs that are lost due to integrated functions! Check out some of the really bad implementations out there.

    So quit buying bad implementations and then whining about it. I have a variety of mobos from a variety of manufacturers (Abit, Asus, Gigabyte, Iwill) and they all work fine in this regard.

    Frankly, getting rid of legacy is good. If we could just be rid of the damn 16-bit BIOS things would be a whole lot better, at least in theory.

  119. Re:Makes you wonder by saintlupus · · Score: 2

    Actually, RAID is "redundant array of independent disks."

    Not to be confused with RASDA, the Randomly Accessed Shitty Drive Array. This term was coined a couple years ago by myself and some friends when we realized we all had three or four relatively low capacity drives in our systems because we were all too poor to buy new hardware.

    --saint

  120. What? USB+PS/2 KVMs are NOT that expensive by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

    My Belkin F1DS104T disagrees with you. It has PS/2 inputs and four ports of PS/2 or USB (your choice per-port) goodness. It also supports 1600x1200 resolutions at 85Hz without blurring. Oh, yeah - I got it for about $130 from Pricewatch, and I'd consider that to be pretty reasonable for a very high quality piece of hardware that works perfectly 100% of the time.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  121. Aimed at the consumer market by JPriest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    4 RAID ATA/133's also non RAID capible and 2 standaed ATA/133. Hmm.. that's only 12 drives, the article said it's aimed at the consumer market because it uses ATA/133 instead of SCSI but who has a case that's going to hold 12 drives? On the plus side anyone that does use that many drives probably has most of the HDD's they've ever owned connectd to the motherboard, many of them before SCSI's time. That's where I think it makes sense to use ATA, no home user is going to go out and buy 12 SCSI drives and it's too early to have them laying around just yet. This does mark a nice milestone and I will someday soon enjoy running a quad RAID 0 system + my two CD drives. Now that the memory clock sppeed has bypassed AMD's FSB and many new chipsets are structured to run them out of sync you will see additional performance for DMA. It's good to see someone finding a use for it.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:Aimed at the consumer market by ameoba · · Score: 2

      High-end consumer market... Let's look at some possibilities here:

      For starters, if you want good performance out of an IDE system, you only put a single device on each channel. Bringing you to only 6 possible drives. 2 System drives in a RAID, on the HPT chip, DVD, CD-RW with 2 channels free. You could get a $BIGSIZE drive to store your MP3/pr0n collection, internal Zip, DVD burner, or whatever super-cool toy comes down the line 6mo from now.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  122. It still has one legacy port by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    The floppy connector.

    Which, with all those IDE connectors would have been piss easy to dump.

    Afterall IDE floppy drives have been arround for at least 5 years (both the normal 1.4MB type & the 1.4MB/120MB supper floppy type), actually if you search hard enough on the web you can find 5.25" CD-ROM/floopy combo IDE drives (yes they don't just make em for laptops).

  123. Re:Completely useless by QuietRiot · · Score: 2
    This is an EXCELENT idea!!!! You must tell people about this. Drive a PC speaker directly - with a LED that indicates "there is an error somewhere - hook up your PC speaker to hear it." Would even work on a headless box!

    Wow!

  124. Re:What? USB+PS/2 KVMs are NOT that expensive by elmegil · · Score: 2

    The last Belkin KVM I owned was a PoS, I don't plan to spend money on them again. But thanks for the info; if they're doing it, certainly someone else will catch on.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  125. Re:Completely useless by ameoba · · Score: 2

    Oh how quickly you forget...

    having all of the STANDARD components that a VAST MAJORITY of computer users are going to be using integrated on the motherboard, with guaranteed compatability between them is a bad idea. I sure wanna go back to the days when NOTHING was built onto the motherboard and I had to go out and buy my serial/parallel/fdd/hdd controlers and add them onto the board.

    And what's the point in bringing up poor implimentations? Integrated hardware or not, you'll still have cut-rate crappy hardware, better to have it integrated so that you have some hope of it working together without catching on fire.

    And most integrated hardware these days is fine.. integrated audio is good enough for non-audiophiles. Integrated video good enough for those who aren't demanding gamers. Integrated IDE is good enough for those who don't want to run multi-TB databases. Integrated NICs are good enough unless you have the bandwidth to saturate a 100Mb connection.

    Notice a trend here? If the standard integrated componets aren't good enough for your needs you belong to a SMALL NICHE MARKET that has more demanding standards than the vast majority of users, and as such are going to need more expensive high-end hardware. I'm sure you'd like to live in a utopia where everyone had the very best in hardware, but I like being able to buy my father an $800 machine that's got more power than he'll ever need to use.

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  126. Why oh Why? by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Why do some people say, "This is probably offtopic but," then go on to make extremely interesting, relevent, and useful posts?

    I guess to make up for the idiots who post boring, irrelevent, and useless crap, and then whine at full volume when they're modded down.

    Now, this post is clearly offtopic! Let's see what happens...