Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Episode II: The Book Review

Dark Paladin writes: "Why wait a week when you can go read the novelization of Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, and know what happens before you view it on the big screen? Then again, if the book is any indication, you might as well wait for the Big Screen version instead." Read on for the rest of his review to see why. Star Wars: Episode II, Attack of the Clones author R. A. Salvatore pages 336 publisher Ballantine Publishing Group rating 6 reviewer Dark Paladin ISBN 0345428811 summary It's written from the screen-play -- how much more do you need to know?

Hello, Mr. Salvatore! For the folks who want to get the details on the story without downloading the bootleg version, there's always the novelization based on the screen play, adapted by R. A. Salvatore (the same man behind the many D&D books in the fantasy section of the bookstore).

The last time this happened, Terry Brooks was the captain, guiding us through his interpretation of Episode I: The Phantom Menace. It was a good book, filling in the gaps that the movie missed, while telling the story in style. To be honest, I wish we had Mr. Brooks back. It's not that I don't like Mr. Salvatore, but -- well, maybe I don't after reading this book.

It's clear that Salvatore had access to the screen play for the movie, with every move, look, and nuance that was put inside. He also has access to the choreographed scenes, which becomes clear since he feels the need to tell us every single detail of the fights. Thanks to him, I now know that in a fight scene between Obi-Wan and Jango Fett, Obi-Wan "...ducked the blow and did a tight, stationary somersault right under the swinging arm, double-kicking as he came over...", and every other minor detail, blow, kick and jump. A fight scene that probably takes 2 minutes in the movie now takes up 15 pages of text.

It's overkill, and Salvatore does this over and over again. I would say he's wordy, but the definition is too short by at least 30 characters. In another scene, where Anakin goes all Dark Side on us, Salvatore writes it like this (well, not exactly - but it feels that way):

And as the rage raged through Anakin's rage, he raged through his raging rage to rage the rage rage.

I'm not clear here - is Anakin angry? It's a formula that is used over and over again with as much verbage as Salvatore can invent - how much Shmi Skywalker misses her son, or how Padme has chosen professional life over personal life.

You almost want to scream out "We get the point - move on to the story!"

Jedi and Bounty Hunters and Clones, Oh My!

The story itself is predictable sci-fi fiction. We can spot a plot device half a mile away, and in many ways, it emulates Episode I in its setup.

The story involves the attempted assassination of Padme Amidala, who is no longer Queen of Naboo (seems they can only serve 2 terms), but is now Senator of Naboo, fighting to prevent the creation of an army for the Republic to defend it from the Separatists. So the Jedi Council, at the advice of Emperor^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Supreme Chancellor Palpatine, enlists the help of Obi-Wan Kenobi and his Padawan Apprentice, Anakin Skywalker, to protect the young Senator.

While Obi-Wan takes off to chase after the assassins, Anakin is holed up with Padme all alone on her home planet on Naboo. Of course, nobody else seems to notice that Anakin has been Jonesing for Padme since he was 10. Even though Obi-Wan seems to think that Anakin might get himself into trouble, but is overruled by the Jedi Council, who don't seem to realize that a barely 20-year-old man with raging hormones around Natalie Portman might feel a little tempted.

This soon leads to romantic moments between the younglings, boiled down to this:

Anakin: Padme, I love you, and I'm not even vaguely trying to uphold my vows as a would-be Jedi to never marry. Kind of like a Catholic Priest, without the altar boy scandal. Padme: Anakin, we can't be together. You're a Jedi, and are forbidden to marry. (Even though I think those brown robes are so hot on you.) Anakin: What was that? Padme: Oh, nothing. Let's to romp in the meadow and hold hands even though I say we're not going to fall in love. Anakin: Sure. Can I look longingly at you at times? Padme: If you must. (While I undress you with my eyes.) Anakin: What? Padme: Nothing!
Gaps in the Universe

So while Padme and Anakin are making goo-goo eyes at each other, Obi-Wan is discovering the creation of a clone army, an army based on the genes of Jango Fett, the best bounty hunter of the galaxy, who's cloned son, Boba Fett, is being trained by his "father" to be even better.

But then the questions come up. Who would want the creation of a clone army to fight the Separatists, when the Senate is still arguing about creating an army in the first place? What is Count Dooku, the former Jedi who is labeled as "the best kick ass lightsaber duelist in the history of the galaxy", doing at the head of the Separatists - and what is his plan? And how long until Anakin and Padme finally give in to their lusts and make the beast of two backs?

The story, in and of itself, isn't that interesting. But the story does a good job at tying up the lines between Star Wars Episode 4: A New Hope and the prequels. For the first time, we meet Owen and Beru, and understand how they fit into the Skywalker family. We see how the future Emperor manipulates the public to put himself as the head of the Republic. That alone is enjoyable as you go "Ah...now that makes sense."

But for the cost of the $26.00 book, you might as well just wait a week and pay $11.00 at the movie theaters for the same information - in much less time.

You can purchase Attack of the Clones from bn.com. Want to see your own review here? Just read the book review guidelines, then use Slashdot's handy submission form.

241 comments

  1. Important Facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    • Senator Palpatine IS the Emperor.
    • Padme and Anakin get married.
    • Anakins mom sold to the Sandpeople. She dies in his arms.
    • Count Dokoo chops Anakins arm off, escapes with Death Star Plans.
    • Stormtroopers are clones, apparently.

    Please excuse any errors in the above. I have never actually seen Attack of the Clones or The Phantom Menace, as I am over the age of fifteen.

    Use these facts for whatever purpose you see fit, especially if it involves irritating the hell out of some Lucasdroid.

    -----

    Full synopsis (plagiarized from a fanboy, so please forgive the spelling):

    Padmes life is in danger and JengaFett is there to kill her, hired by someone else (Count Dokoo via the Emporer/Palpatine). Jenga has another person try to get Padme.

    Anakin is angry and frustrated the whole time. Anakin wants to see his mother and goes to Tattooine to find that she was sold to the sandpeople. They then go to the Lars home (a young uncle Owen and family) where he is told that she is still with the sandpeople. Anakin sneaks into the camp, finds mom, she dies in his arms, he gets mad and slaughters the whole camp (that part not shown). Lukes landspeeder is shown along with those icky blue drinks from ANH.

    Obi Wan takes a small dart from earlier when Jengas first attempt on Padme fails. A fry cook tells Obi Wan the dart is from a mining planet. Obi Wan cant find the planet at the library, but flys there instead. Later we find that the planet was removed from the database (but only by a great Jedi assum to be Master Diso-Edyn). Turns out Diso-Edyn had the folks at this planet build human clones of Jenga nearly 10 years before and had not returned since. They assumed Obi Wan knew of these plans and Obi went along with it. But since Obi is there to take out jenga for trying to assasinate padme, they get into a great fight. There is a young boba fett here too (an unaltered clone of Jenga).

    best quote: from obi to anakin --> "you are going to be the death of me someday".

    Menwhile behind the scenes Senator Palpatine aka the Emporer is playing both sides. And it is more apparent that he IS the emporer.

    Lots of talk of how the the dark side and brought a cloud the force making the jedi unable to see how the sith has been planning so much for so long.

    Great action of war between the droids from EP I and the new Clones (stormtroopers). The clones actually fight for the jedi here, but are then taken away by the Republic later. Jenga is decapitated by Obi in front of boba and later boba is seen picking up his fathers helmet. Yoda is the war general for the good guys....

    r2 and c3po scenes are very funny. mace windu gets a lot of fight scenes.

    At the end Obi Wan and Anakin fight Count Dokoo (who I guess is Darth Tyrannus, the new apprentice to the Sith Lord). Obi Wan gets injured and Anakin gets his arm cut off. Yoda appears and flys around like Kermit on speed with his mini light saber. Dokoo was Yodas apprentice. Dokoo drops a pillar on the two injured jedi and Yoda uses the force to stop it. While he does that Dokoo escapes with the newly developed plans for building the Death Star (neat tie in).

    The movie ends with all of the clones (stormtroopers) are loaded up on several star destroyers and headed out to space - and padme/anankin get married with anakin sporting a metallic gold arm.

    1. Re:Important Facts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention that the Lone Gunmen are dead.

  2. Why wait for the book? by reo_kingu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why take the time to read the book when you can just watch the telesync now :)

    1. Re:Why wait for the book? by BitHive · · Score: 0
      Why watch the telesync when you can go out drinking instead?

      Kills fewer brain cells :-)

    2. Re:Why wait for the book? by cei · · Score: 2

      Why watch a telesync when THX is hiring?

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    3. Re:Why wait for the book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why watch the telesync when I can watch the DVD screener that I'm holding right now?

  3. Wordy... by zerOnIne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Always remember this basic rule of writing:

    Conciseness is to be preferred over loquacity and verbosity.

    --
    09
    1. Re:Wordy... by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, boiled down to its essence:

      SHOW, don't TELL.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Wordy... by hitzroth · · Score: 1

      meaning we should go SEE the movie, not READ the book.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    3. Re:Wordy... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      "And as the rage raged through Anakin's rage, he raged through his raging rage to rage the rage rage." - Well I thought the book made from the Super Mario Brothers was very poorly written until I read that! IMHO I think that books that are made into films are generally better than films that are made into books. With a book made from a film the author's got to tell someone else's story and write bits to cover bits the film misses out.

    4. Re:Wordy... by elsegundo · · Score: 1

      And it's corollary:

      Eschew obfuscation

      --


      The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    5. Re:Wordy... by yasth · · Score: 1
      Or, boiled down to its essence:
      SHOW, don't TELL.


      Nah, that is the rule against meaeaninglyess exposition, and instead just to flashback for a few pages instead of having a few pages explaining it. It sounds like Salvatore is just using far too many words to descibe an action, which is to an extent a personel prefrence. However, who really expects novelizations of movies to be decent? (caveat, Waterworld's book was far better then the movie, but that wasn't hard) If the new novels have collectible covers like the old ones this one should sell well.
      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    6. Re:Wordy... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I think you're right -- it's overall easier to trim stuff out of a book to create a 2 hour film, than it is to fill in all the gaps from a film to make a 200 page book.

      Then again, from what little I've seen, Salvatore is a lousy writer regardless.

      [Credentialia: I write fiction too (space opera), and I occasionally edit other folks' fiction for real money.]

      Still laughing over the other reply I got, interpreting "Show, don't tell" as "See the movie, don't read the book!" :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Wordy... by Reziac · · Score: 5, Informative

      "SHOW, don't TELL" isn't just an admonishment against "meaningless exposition". It also applies to how one describes a character's emotional reactions, perceptions of the environment, etc.

      My homegrown example goes thus:

      TELLING: When I heard what he'd done, I was so angry, I've never been madder in my life, and I wanted to choke him to death!

      SHOWING: When I heard what he'd done, the room went red around me, and my hands longed to feel his neck turning to pulp.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Wordy... by zerOnIne · · Score: 2

      actually it boils down to "shorter is better", or in the words of thoreau: "keep it simple! keep it simple! keep it simple!" :)

      --
      09
    9. Re:Wordy... by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      Why use big words when diminutive ones will suffice?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    10. Re:Wordy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, my friend, is why you're not writing for a living.

    11. Re:Wordy... by Charles+Kerr · · Score: 1

      omit unnecessary words!

    12. Re:Wordy... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I've always thougt that the Waterworld would make an excellent open ended rpg. That was the one thought that kept me watching the boring movie.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    13. Re:Wordy... by Tattva · · Score: 2
      "And as the rage raged through Anakin's rage, he raged through his raging rage to rage the rage rage." - Well I thought the book made from the Super Mario Brothers was very poorly written until I read that!

      While that sounds really bad you can't judge a book by a line like that taken out of context.&nbsp Just try to read James Joyce without running across some verbiage more mangled than that, and most critics either hate him or think he's the second coming.

      --
      personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  4. heh by klocwerk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's kind of interesting to think about how deeply star wars has slumped in the minds of geeks.

    We were all built up and excited about episode 1.
    Then we saw that it sucked.
    Then the rumors about Leo DiCrapio playing anakin in 2.
    Then we saw that it would suck.
    Luckily that didn't happen.
    but here's episode 2, and we all hear that it sucks.

    What I want to know is whether or not Geroge Lucas really thinks that these are quality movies he's making, or if he realizes that they are in fact made to sell the toys.

    Just my opinion.

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
    1. Re:heh by theNote · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I agree, it is sad.

      If you visit the message boards on any star wars fan site, you will find thousands of posts with all kinds of possibilites on how the backstory could develop.

      99% of what the fans come up with is better than what Lucas has written.

    2. Re:heh by pheared · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ruh roh, looks like you offended an enlisted man in the Lucas army.

    3. Re:heh by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Then we all realized that Slashdot holds not a collective opinion on any topic.

      Fuzzy
  5. The good old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I don't like about Star Wars now is everything seems to be based on the story to make sense of something.
    The first 3 SW of the old days we're based on a story but the story wasn't everything, as it is now.
    Lucas seems to try to make sense out of all this. We can't simply enjoy the show...we're forced to understand the why's, who's when's, etc.
    Still...I waited 24 hours outside to see Fantom but liked it kinda, but I won't wait for this one. If I can see the Premiere, I will but someone will go wait for me to buy the tickets.
    :)

  6. Novels by Economist · · Score: 0, Troll

    I was wondering, on what are the movies based? Are there any novels on wich the movies are based? Are there novels for the probably never coming Star Wars Episodes 7, 8 and 9?

    1. Re:Novels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two letters: EU

      (Expanded Universe, like Zahn, etc, etc)

    2. Re:Novels by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      They're based on story outlines written by George Lucas, each of which is probably no more than 10 pages when written down.

      After these quick pitches, a screenplay is written by a team of writers. Then re-writen. And then interpreted by the Producer and the Director.

      And THEN, once the movie's done, the novelization is written.

      I believe that the current buzz is that Eps. 7-9 are a myth. There is a wide selection of Star Wars novels (and graphic novels, which share the same continuity) written after Ep. 6. Each of these novels is written by lucasfilm, and continuity is, I believe, rather stricly controlled.

      R.A. Salvatore, btw, probably got this book deal for doing the dirty deed and killing off a major character in the novels. (No, I'm not going to say who. Read Vector Prime and find out.)

    3. Re:Novels by dciman · · Score: 2

      Vector Prime totally broke my heart. How could they have done that?

    4. Re:Novels by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Got a two part answer for you.

      1: It's an important part of any fictional setting to change. It's a principle that, without which, Spider-Man would never have met Mary Jane, Star Trek would still a campy western in space, and most of Shakesphere's play been rather dull.

      2: I have no idea what they were thinking, or why they decided to pull it off like that. It was a confusing scene, and seems as much to be suicide as anything else. *sigh*

      AFAIK, Lucas said "kills this character this way," and Salvatore did his best. I know that Margaret Weis was actually offered the chance to write that book, and she turned it down halfway through a draft because they were so controlling.

      (Speaking of writers who change their worlds...)

    5. Re:Novels by Variable114 · · Score: 1

      Variable114@hotmail.com if you don't mind telling me who was killed, ive read many star wars books (im 16 and a couple years ago the young jedi knight [jason and jana - han and leas twins] books were my favorites...) and im reading 4 books right now, but id REALLY like to know so i dont have to wait to read it this summer. thanks Var.

  7. Zahn by theNote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    None of the Star Wars books come within a hundred parsecs of the Timothy Zahn post trilogy.

    He manages to pull off what Lucas can't:
    Tell a story in the Star Wars universe that keeps the pace of the movies, but at the same time leaves out the "Yippees!" and fart jokes.

    Having read the screenplay and book, you can hardly blame Salvatore for the result.
    He wasn't give alot of material to work with.

    1. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find yourself the three Han Solo novels written by Brian Daley, if you can.

      Shadows of the Empire, by Steve Perry, was also pretty good.

    2. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I didn't read the Zahn books but much of what I have heard from friends who did sounds like what you are saying. I don't know anyone who read them who didn't at least like them a little. I once picked up "Han Solo at Stars End" or something like that and have never touched a Star Wars book again. God it was terrible.

      Anyway I have to disagree with you on Salvatore. Granted there probably wasn't much there to work with but he is hardly the guy you would want to try and fill in the gaps. I have read a few of his books and can only say that this man couldn't write his name in 50 words or less. He's earned his place in literary history with an ability to crank out books fast but he's repetitive to the extreme and as the reviewer pointed out incapable of brevity even when it's needed.

    3. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those Han Solo adventures are classic...nothing like 180 page tie-in books at a 4th grade reading level, mmm. I only bought them for the cover art--the pissed off wookie is the best.

      Kind of reminds me of the 14 Battlestar Galactica books.

    4. Re:Zahn by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2

      I have to agree. I devoured Zahn's books - the creation of whats-his-face - the red-eyed, art loving Empire leader - was one of the greatest evil characters invented for the Star Wars universe.

      I read those books - then one or two others - than promptly swore off all Star Wars books. While my sisters read every one (and collect the action figures and everything else), I'm content to live with the Star Wars story ending with Thrawn's death (I knew I'd remember the name).

      Then again, I did read the Terry Brooks version of Episode I - after all, it was written by Terry Brooks.

    5. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, you're stupid.

    6. Re:Zahn by raistlinne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the second two were, in my opinion, better books than the first. I found the first one to be a bit slow, but then again you have to set up before you can move on.

      That being said, star wars is an epic, and that's what the best SW stories are going to be. In a (non-tragic) epic, the important people generally don't die, even when they do dangerous things (in a tragic epic, everyone dies even when they don't do dangerous things - but I'm not really fond of those). Why is it really that important to you that people have to die if they do dangerous things? Why must dangerous things result in death or it makes a book bad?

      And the truth is that people get lucky in life. When you write a story, you write about those exceptional people who get lucky more than most. If a story was about truly average people, they'd be boring. If we want to read about truly average people, we can just just skip the reading and look around.

      Besides, if you dislike reaslism, why do you pick up on people getting lucky (and if anyone is going to get lucky, I would imagine that a jedi master would be the sort of person who is lucky more than most), why don't you pick on people being noble so often? Most real people want to live their lives quietly in peace and comfort and really just sort of try to adapt to any hardship that comes there way. Most people would not fight an evil empire, they'd just live in it as best they can.

      So why is it such a big deal that extraordinary people have extraordinary things happen to them? Let's not forget that plenty of them are, in effect, magicians. One doesn't expect the ordinary with magicians, or at least you shouldn't.

      Also, you left out the part where luke goes into a jedi trance where he needs only infinitessimal amounts of oxygen and heat to survive, thus enabling him to live long enough to be stumbled upon. Convenient? Yes. Unlikely? Yes. Impossible, well, not after you've already granted the existence of the jedi.

      Besides, has it not occurred to you that the book had been following Karde's ship pricesly because at some point he would be the one who ran accross luke? (Remember, luke was not in a highly unpopulated area and so it was likely that someone would eventually run accross him.) This is a not uncommon narrative device, where you start telling a bunch of independent stories and eventually tie them together. It's not that the main characters were randomly chosen and then through a series of insanely unlikely events all happen to come together. It's that an event was picked, or perhaps a few characters were picked, and whoever happened to come along was then selected and their story fleshed out.

      All this being said, in my opinion the first book is best when it is dealing with Grand Admiral Thrawn, and everyone else is less interesting. In the second and third books, however, I think that his handling of the other characters is better (or one just gets used to his take on their personalities), and they're thoroughly enjoyable reading. While I could put the first book down, the second and third I couldn't stop reading.

      I was a bit dissapointed with the way that Thrawn was killed. It made perfect sense, but it was a bit ... I don't know. I'd have rather than killing thrawn had been harder, even if the way he was killed made perfect sense and fit well with the rest of the plot.

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    7. Re:Zahn by Agilus · · Score: 0
      You make some good points, and some of them were floating around in the back of my head when I was writing my original post. I might have to go back and check out the second and third books, if they are better, like you say.


      It's not like I thought the death of Luke would make a better book. When I had gotten that far, I just felt like too many things went right for the protagonists. If you look at the movies, you'll see lots of permanent or semi-permanent things happen to the characters. Luke loses a hand, Han gets frozen, C3PO gets destroyed, Obiwan dies, Yoda dies, etc. In the first book of the Zahn trilogy, nothing serious happens to anyone. It just takes a lot of suspense and enjoyment out of the reading if you lose the sense that the characters are in any sort of danger.


      I agree with you that Admiral Thrawn was an interesting character. He'd probably be a good reason for reading the second two books.

      --
      hackshop.com - My tech hobby project hub
    8. Re:Zahn by bishnu · · Score: 2, Informative
      Zahn obviously had no license to do anything permanent to the characters

      It's sad that they forbid him to do stuff like that, and then let RA Salvatore kill of Chewbacca in that idiotic New Jedi Order series.

      At any rate, to see Zahn close out the original set of Star Wars novels in style, check out Spectre from the Past and Vision of the Future. In a mature manner if FINALLY wraps up the story arc that continued from Return of the Jedi, and it's full of permanent changes to the original characters, so that should make you happy.

      It is also missing the hellishly annoying Solo children who pervade the New Jedi Order novels. Thank god!

    9. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read 17 of the star wars books, I was a little addicted at the age of 14 after seeing the movies for the first time.

      The only collection that stands out in my mind from the lot was the trilogy written by "Michael P. Kube-McDowell". (Before the storm, Shield of lies, tyrants test).

      Perhaps because they were more militant, and that's how I prefer to remember the origional movies.

      Fantastic books though, I felt some of the others were a bit of a bore in comparison - the x-wing ones were good mind, I've only read the first 4 though.

    10. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no.
      Zahn was shit.

      Not only did he introduce the "here's some animals that nullify the Force" bullshit, but he created what has to be the stupidest goddamn clone naming convention in the history of sci-fi literature. "I'm not Jorus, I'm his clone, Joruus! I made a clone of Luke! I'll call him Luuke!"

      What happens if you make, like, twenty of them? "Hey Luuuuuuuuuuke, come here!" "I'm not Luuuuuuuuuuke, I'm Luuuke! Oh, sorry, where's Luuuuuuuuuuuuke, and Haaaaaaaaaaaaan, and Cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeewie? Oh, hell, Leia has three vowels in a row, which do I replicate to indicate this is a clone? Leeeia, Leiiiiiiiiia, LeiaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaa...."

      That, and good old Deus Ex Machina "I spent ten seconds looking at this ancient tapestry and now can foresee every single thing everyone in this culture will do for the next three books" Thrawn.

      Timothy Zahn's novels are garbage. I keep the Heir to the Empire trilogy around and read from it as a means of driving out rude houseguests.

    11. Re:Zahn by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      Agreed on all points.

    12. Re:Zahn by ionpro · · Score: 1

      Although the Zahn trilogy is by far the best one, I've been quite impressed with some of the latest New Jedi Order stuff. Especially books such as Star by Star, and the latest one Rebel Dream I (to be followed by a sequel). FINALLY, somone who knows how to write Lando right!

    13. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the movies, you'll see lots of permanent or semi-permanent things happen to the characters

      Think about, how many starwars books have been written? The characters are the only things that kept me reading the books simply becuase I was so familiar with them. Luca$film wasn't going to kill the cash cow before they'd milked it dry. I'd say no permanent changes to characters would have been a non-negotiable part of Zahn's contract.

    14. Re:Zahn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Savaltor had to kill off Chewbacca in that book. It was in the contract specifications for him writing the novel.

    15. Re:Zahn by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      The K.W. Jeter Boba Fett books where *very* good.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    16. Re:Zahn by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      I agree with you in principle, but your comment about the permanent changes really isn't as compelling as it might be. Luke loses a hand, but gets a new one five minutes later and there are no consequences. Han gets frozen (which is a really cool idea) but gets thawed and is fine. Obiwan dies and comes to visit every time there's a problem.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  8. Let me guess... by Kizzle · · Score: 2, Redundant

    George Lucas only wants this book to be in digital format? ;)

  9. I heard Lucas on the radio the other day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard a soundbite from Lucas on the radio the other day where he was asked why he thought people didn't like Episode 1.

    His response was "the starwars hate was all media hype. the actual public loved it".

    Wow. Talk about a man in denial. I have yet to meet anyone who could say more than "yeah, it was good... not great, but okay..." - and those are the rarities. 90% of people I know thought it was a terrible movie. Hell, I had a chance to see it a second time in the theater for free. But I stayed home and took a nap instead.

  10. Re:why pay at all? by jrl2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yeah there's no point watching a movie other than to "talk shop with fanatics".
    I don't know why I ever bother.

    --
    Disclaimer: This isn't a troll, I'm just a fucking idiot.
  11. This guy is Dr. Seuss' dark side by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Funny
    And as the rage raged through Anakin's rage, he raged through his raging rage to rage the rage rage.

    Anakin raged in a cage without his mama kin
    Raging rage like a tearing page set the stage
    Gauge his rage with a wise mage
    You'll see how Anakin can rage man can Anakin

    1. Re:This guy is Dr. Seuss' dark side by duren686 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who are you and where did you get the lyrics to Eminem's new unreleased song?

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
  12. Is it any suprise? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For instance, we have a really bad screenplay, that is acted really poorly for a really bad movie (so they say).

    Then, we find a really bad writer (Salvatore).

    The book will be really _________. (Fill in the blank).

    I've always liked fantasy as much as scifi, and when I have nothing else to read, I'll even tolerate the mediocre stuff. The Tracy Hickman, Marg Weiss D&D books, for instance.

    So, I've ran out of all those books, and used book are only 50 cents, right? So I pick up a bunch of Salvatore's books. Bad mistake. His books aren't worth the toilet paper that they could have turned that pulp into.

    I think, and don't take this as gospel, Salvatore wrote down the synopsis of all his D&D games that he (aged 9 or so) played with his cocker spaniel puppy because no one else would play with him. Then, stretching all those notes into 400 page long manuscripts, he somehow blackmailed a publisher into turning them into real books. I mean, goddamn, I didn't expect it to be the the Dragonbon Chair or anything like that, but this was absolutely unreadable. It was, and still is, the only good excuse for illiteracy. *BARF* Should have let those memories remain repressed.

    How, on fucking earth, did they manage to let him novelize this? They had their pick, even some first rate authors might have wanted to do this. If nothing else, Alan Dean Foster always did a tolerable job of novelizations (though the best, probably was Orson Scott Card's "The Abyss"). The only thing I can figure, he (Salvatore) has photographic evidence of Lucas getting blowjobs from 9 yr old Thai children in return for handing over USA Top Secret military documents to a chinese agent (both on the same pic).

    Yes, he is that bad.

    1. Re:Is it any suprise? by wilpig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Opinion != Fact

    2. Re:Is it any suprise? by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "For instance, we have a really bad screenplay, that is acted really poorly for a really bad movie (so they say)."

      Maybe I'm just not with it, but am I the only one who is reserving judgment on the movie until after I see it?

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    3. Re:Is it any suprise? by meara · · Score: 1

      I agree with the general consensus that the Clones novelization is pretty poor, particularly when compared to the last one, but I don't find it representative of Salvatore in general.

      The Drizzt Do'Urden books (starting with the Dark Elf Trilogy) are worthy reads, which inclines me to believe that what was missing here was not creative ability, but rather Terry Brooks's willingness to ignore the screenplay and fill in the gaping plot holes with some actual depth.

      In the end, Salvatore appears to have been intimidated by the vast Star Wars franchise and has kept too close to the (very bad) screenplay instead of trusting in his own creative instincts. A pity, but not a true reflection of his talent and original works.

    4. Re:Is it any suprise? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, that is unfair. But after Ep. 1, can you really blame me if I'm less than enthusiastic?

    5. Re:Is it any suprise? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      I've not read Brooks, to be honest. But even so, I can say without any uncertainty whatsoever, he would have been a far better choice.

      If this one is really just "really bad" then Salvatore has improved more than should be possible.

    6. Re:Is it any suprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding me. The Drizzt series is a pefect example of just how terrible a writer Salvatore is. The man CANNOT write decent dialogue or action and his characters are uninspired. While it's true that there are very few decent fantasy authors left...surely someone at ILM mentioned Salvatore's record.

    7. Re:Is it any suprise? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I think, and don't take this as gospel, Salvatore wrote down the synopsis of all his D&D games that he (aged 9 or so) played with his cocker spaniel puppy because no one else would play with him. Then, stretching all those notes into 400 page long manuscripts, he somehow blackmailed a publisher into turning them into real books. I mean, goddamn, I didn't expect it to be the the Dragonbon Chair or anything like that, but this was absolutely unreadable. It was, and still is, the only good excuse for illiteracy. *BARF* Should have let those memories remain repressed.

      Wow, a fan of the Dragonborn Chair, critizing Dragonlance. (You probably think that LotR ended perfectly, too.)

      Salvatore (& most of the other TSR authors) were in-house people who pitched books when the company started up their literary publishing arm. Considering that their chances of being "literary fiction" were next to nill, they mostly just focused on fun stories that, yes, probably would have made find D&D campaigns.

      Pick up the books out of the trash, and look at their binding. They're published by either TSR or Wizards of the Coast--not a publishing house of any credulity, but rather a niche publisher that does an amazing job catering to the low-brow fantasy market.

      You know, the part that still knows how to have fun and doesn't worry about "complexity" in their fantasies.

      How, on fucking earth, did they manage to let him novelize this?

      He wrote Vector Prime, and has recieved hate mail for following Lucas's orders. Margaret Weis was offered the project, but turned it down because of how controlling Lucas was.

      AFAIK, there aren't any "first rate" authors doing Star Wars books. And the reason, quite simply, is because they aren't given enough control to make it artistically a good run. They're not writing their own story in Star Wars--they're writing yet another story that Lucas's book department wants written.

    8. Re:Is it any suprise? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Tad William's Dragonbone Chair is... words abandon me. The whole trilogy, is excellent. There are things I'm sure I never did pick up on, it had many levels of subtley.

      Memory, Sorrow and Thorn is the name of it, should you ever want to read something good.

      If you mean LoTR, the books, yes, they ended rather well. Though, I'm pretty sure even Tolkien wouldn't have said that was the "end" of that story... the man invented an entire world, with a history so complex, that nothing compares, except maybe our own (real) world. The movie? Haven't seen it yet. Not sure I want to.

    9. Re:Is it any suprise? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Wait, you said something worth hearing, and you have a -1 ? Whoa. Shocker. *grin*

    10. Re:Is it any suprise? by hymie3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe I'm just not with it, but am I the only one who is reserving judgment on the movie until after I see it?

      Yes. Yes, you are.

      I was so horribly let down by TPM that I have decided to force myself (not that hard to do after hearing about senator jar jar) to have the lowest of all possible expectation for AotC. Think Police Academy 6 bad. If AotC is better than Police Academy 6, I'll be happy.

      The key happiness is having very low expectations.

    11. Re:Is it any suprise? by Pseudonym · · Score: 2
      For instance, we have a really bad screenplay, that is acted really poorly for a really bad movie (so they say).

      Then, we find a really bad writer (Salvatore).

      The book will be really _________. (Fill in the blank).

      Let me guess... you've never seen The Producers , right?

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    12. Re:Is it any suprise? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Tad William's Dragonbone Chair is... words abandon me. The whole trilogy, is excellent. There are things I'm sure I never did pick up on, it had many levels of subtley.

      I read it. "Subtltey" it may have but, IMO, that's all it's got. I'm not sure if it's good enough to buy (borrowed it from a friend), but I'm pretty sure that it won't go on my list of 10-best books of all time.

      And the books... if the same plot had been set in any other setting, it would have flopped. The first time I tried to read them they felt cliched. Then pushed myself to read the book before the movie, and I was able to read the entire darn thing. Fellowship was great. The Two Towers was respectable. But Return of the King...

      The story ended halfway through the book, in a manner that was anticlimatic even counting for all of the derivites I've read, and then was expanded to fill the other half of the book with a rather vapous homecoming story that rested far too heavily on the literary grip the other books placed upon the reader--and then ended abruptly, to boot.

      I think it's fair to say that the poor quality of most fantasy trilogies can be blamed on Tolkien.

      As for inventing worlds with complex histories--Tolkien's not the only one. Weis & Hickman's Dragonlance, Ed Greenwood's Forgotten Realms, Lucas's Star Wars, and others that I haven't had the pleasure of reading also have complex and rich histories. J.R.R.T. was the first, but he's hardly unique in the simple act of doing it. All that he's got is precedence.

      As for the movie adaptation--If you've ever liked a movie, go see it. Or better yet, wait for the expanded DVD collection coming out later this year. (If you don't want to buy it, e-mail me a time this fall when you'll be in Albany NY.)

      The movie takes some liberties with the script, but the changes all serve to better show the world and the characters than an unimaginitive translation would.

    13. Re:Is it any suprise? by plastik55 · · Score: 2

      You imply that you're still going to see Episode 2. Did you buy a ticket to Police Academy 6?

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    14. Re:Is it any suprise? by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      As for inventing worlds with complex histories--Tolkien's not the only one. Weis & Hickman's Dragonlance, Ed Greenwood's Forgotten Realms, Lucas's Star Wars, and others that I haven't had the pleasure of reading also have complex and rich histories. J.R.R.T. was the first, but he's hardly unique in the simple act of doing it. All that he's got is precedence.

      I'm afraid I haven't read the books you cite, so I'll have to take you at your word that they've got rich histories (I'm not a big fan of the fantasy genre, and maybe Tolkein is to blame for that, too). I hope that when you mention Star Wars, though, you mean something more than the movies. I've only read a few Star Wars books, and so far I haven't seen anything that comes close to the level of obsessive-compulsive detail that Tolkein reached with The Silmarillion.

    15. Re:Is it any suprise? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I hope that when you mention Star Wars, though, you mean something more than the movies. I've only read a few Star Wars books, and so far I haven't seen anything that comes close to the level of obsessive-compulsive detail that Tolkein reached with The Silmarillion.

      (Gotta remember to read the Silmarillion.)

      Star Wars has quite a history of its own. If we simply limit ourselves to Lucas's work, he at least equals Tolkien's development of backstory.

      Remember that the Silmarillion was published after LotR and, IIRC, posthumously as well. Once George Lucas Jr. follows Chris Tolkien's path and releases an annotated version of his daddy's work, I'm sure the depth will be there.

      (Heck, if we're just going to measure depth by detail, don't forget that The Silmarillion was just a book, and that Lucas's got storyboards, several novels, and some diagrams to boot. ;) )

    16. Re:Is it any suprise? by kryonD · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Pick up the books out of the trash, and look at their binding. They're published by either TSR or Wizards of the Coast--not a publishing house of any credulity, but rather a niche publisher that does an amazing job catering to the low-brow fantasy market.

      Or rather, a credible publishing house that owns the rights to the Dungeons and Dragons universe. Hence why no one else publishes the stories. They aren't allowed to. TSR was purchased by Wizards of the Coast and so they are inherrently the same entity when it comes to publishing. I'm not sure what you deem as credible, or what you deem as quality, but the simple fact is that D&D books, including Salvatore's, have been around for years. And the popular ones, some of Salvatore's included, continue to be reprinted because people continue to read, and re-read them.

      As far as the movie quality sucking, Two things:

      #1 We've built our hopes up for years over these films and quite possibly built them too high.

      #2 The whole reason why the films are being made is because someone with a rudimentary grasp of economics realized the baby-boomer generation would line up like little kids to pay for the hope of more childhood magic. (which they were when the original movies came out, and as we have seen so far for both movies, they have) The sad truth is that even if the second movie sucks as bad as everyone is saying, the same lines will be formed for Episode 3. Sure, they might be a little shorter, but lines they will be with cash in hand.

      Just a note on the verbose fight scenes in the book. The reviewer is clearly unfamiliar with Salvatore's writing style. In depth fight scenes are what made Drizzt a legend in the Forgotten Realms world and it's not suprise to see Salvatore sticking with what worked in the past.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    17. Re:Is it any suprise? by carlsefni · · Score: 1

      I'm relieved to see I'm not alone in this opinion. Sometime in my early teens, R.A. Salvatore was one of a handful of authors who made me realize that I didn't like some books solely because the subject matter wasn't interesting to me -- some books just actually sucked :) Being a big role-playing gamer and sci-fi reader back then, I gamely waded through piles of TSR-produced D&D tie-in novels. Some of these I will still maintain weren't so bad, though Salvatore's ham-fisted series wore me down after a couple of books. I just couldn't take it any more. At least "The Eye of Argon" is entertaining :)

      Thus, I have continually been surprised (and mildly irked) that the man has continued turning out reams of what I airly assume to be graceless fantasy novels for the last decade or so, and even has a loyal and devoted fan base. The horror, the horror .... I've never had the courage to see whether he'd gotten better, though the review above suggests that now is not the time to change my ways ;)

    18. Re:Is it any suprise? by Squalish · · Score: 1

      If(wilpig.opinion==parent.opinion){opinion=fact-1; }else{opinion=fact+1;}

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    19. Re:Is it any suprise? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you deem as credible, or what you deem as quality, but the simple fact is that D&D books, including Salvatore's, have been around for years. And the popular ones, some of Salvatore's included, continue to be reprinted because people continue to read, and re-read them.

      (I'm well versed in WotC corporate structure. They were recently bought by Hasbro, actually.)

      I love books. I love fantasy books. I love good fantasy books that happen to take palce in a D&D setting.

      But, really, TSR/WotC has printed some of the worst books ever to hit the market--and they were the ones that were tied to RPG releases, rather than standing on their own. Aside from the original Dragonlance series, *every time* a D&D game products has been made into a novel, it has sucked.

      A good friend of mine (www.dragonlancebooks.com) gets review copies, and I've read some of the ones he won't. Trust me--they're bad.

      WotC also doesn't publish anything BUT D&D books. Hence, they're a niche publisher.

      Just a note on the verbose fight scenes in the book. The reviewer is clearly unfamiliar with Salvatore's writing style. In depth fight scenes are what made Drizzt a legend in the Forgotten Realms world and it's not suprise to see Salvatore sticking with what worked in the past.

      Hey, I'm a big Salvatore fan, and well done fight scenes are a great thing in a fantasy book. But this is also the man who wrote Vector Prime, so I can't assume he did a good job here until I read it myself. (and that "rage rage rage" bit doesn't help matters.)

    20. Re:Is it any suprise? by hymie3 · · Score: 2

      You imply that you're still going to see Episode 2. Did you buy a ticket to Police Academy 6?

      Yeah, I think I did, as a matter of fact. It was a Midnight Movie at the Cobb Madison Square 8. It cost me a buck to get in. It was worth a lot more than that. I had *fun* with the movie: talking back to the actors, laughing at inappropriate moments, throwing JuJuBees at the screen. Fun.

      Somehow I don't think I'd be able to get away with that opening night of Ep2. I'll wait till my friends see it. Then I'll check out the reviews. If the movie is really bad, I'll try to get a few friends together to go see a mid-week matinee.
      And I'll bring JuJuBees.
      And, bad movie or not, I *will* get my money's worth.

  13. Stunning Revelation! by wilpig · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "But for the cost of the $26.00 book, you might as well just wait a week and pay $11.00 at the movie theaters for the same information - in much less time."

    DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Not Everybody reads an entire novell in a couple of hours.

    BTW, have you read any of Salvatore's books? I have. Don't base a book review on a movie even if that book is based on the Movie.

  14. Muppets In Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars has alot to make up for. The last 2 movies were "Muppets in Space" Hopefully Lucas will learn before it is too late that the move is made AT THE SCRIPT! and not with the tech effects.

  15. SPOLERS!!!!!!!!! by qslack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Awww, man. You guys just posted a spoiler about how Anakin was going to go all dark-side on us without even a warning! :(

    Next thing I know, you're going to be telling us that you saw the bootlegged version and that Amidala gets killed, Jar Jar become Lando, the Millenium falcon is built, and the Empire attacks Earth, etc.. I mean, I know that all of those happen in the movie from watching the bootlegged version, but I wish you had put a spoiler warning just in case.

    1. Re:SPOLERS!!!!!!!!! by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's not funny anymore.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:SPOLERS!!!!!!!!! by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      Hm...

      Anakin becomes Darth Vader.

      Yeah, I had never guessed that Anakin was going to give into the Dark Side at some point.

      My bad.

    3. Re:SPOLERS!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up.

    4. Re:SPOLERS!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Jango Fett dies, Anakin loses his hand(the right one, detect a theme? MASTURBATION), Obi-Wan takes a saber slashes, left shoulder and right thigh. Dooku get's away. An army is created.

      I can't wait to see the movie.
      NO BFD

  16. why read watch the bootleg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you wanna spoil the movie, might as well just watch the bootleg version. forget reading. anywho, i give the movie a thumbs up

  17. Faithful to the movie? by GafTheHorseInTears · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm not sure if Mr. Salvatore was entirely faithful to the movie. At least, none of the previews I've seen show Anakin fighting with two curved lightsabers.

    --
    "You're just scared like a little white pussy. I'll fuck you till you love me, you faggot!"
  18. Dooku/separatists by wpmegee · · Score: 2, Informative
    Since Timothy seems to be confused about Dooku-here goes. MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD

    First of all Dooku left the Jedi Order after the Battle of Naboo. He left because he felt the Jedi betrayed themselves by serving the corrupt republic.

    Dooku joined the separatists, because, in a nutshell, the Republic is dead. The bureaucrats rule, not the voters. So Dooku wants to secede from the Republic and create the Confederacy of Indepnedent Systems.

    Here's where Darth Sidious comes in: He (as Palpatine) creates the clone army to counter the Separatists' droid army (secretly), and later, to eliminate the Jedi. Also, the separatists are kind of a conglomeration of guilds and unions like the Trade Federation, Techno Union, and others.

    Finally, Dooku is described as a fencer, and he uses a lightsaber with a curved handle. And he can use Sith lightning. And yes, I bought the book on April 23.

    1. Re:Dooku/separatists by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      "Confederacy of Independent Systems?" You've got to be joking me. Can't Lucas even make up alliance names without ripping off existing, real world alliances? What's next, the Naboo-Antilles Treaty Organization?

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Dooku/separatists by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      The simple fact is, he is not as creative as he once was. (If he truly wrote Ep IV-VI.) He is desperately trying to capitalize on Star Wars again, and is grasping at straws.

      The original Star Wars trilogy was so good because it didn't use cliche, didn't have a bunch of well-known actors, and had some things that were fairly inconceivable.

      I haven't seen II yet, but in I he has done the following:

      1. Turned the force into a scientifically measurable thing. (Mitochondria^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H midi-chlorians) This destroys the mythico-religious symbolism, which was damned important in the later episodes.

      2. Changed Obi-wan's master. In IV his master was Yoda. In I it was Qui-gon. Hmmm.

      3. The movies don't even *look* related. How is Lucas going to explain the change in spacecraft design from I and II to IV-VI? The nice thing about SW was that the spacecraft were very polygon-oriented in design, not curvaceous. It looked more *real* compared to modern technology.

      4. The dialog in the fight scenes in IV-VI made the fights more "human"... it gave the fights meaning instead of just fighting for the fighting. There wasn't any of this in I.

      5. Obi-wan was humble in IV, and it seemed in the original trilogy, the example of a Jedi was a quiet, thoughtful warrior. In I, the Jedi were arrogant, and violence was the first choice, rather than using problem-solving thought process. There was not much "I don't want to fight" and a lot of "I'm going to kick your fscking ass."

      6. Jar-Jar Binks. Enough said.There lies the problems. Lucas should have let fans create the prequels. I guarantee they would have done a better job.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    3. Re:Dooku/separatists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They really could have made this one great by having Dooku be a "good guy" fidghting against Sidious.
      Dooku could have given us a real twist, the Jedi fighting against the separatists, because they didn't yet know the republic was corrupt.
      Instead he's playing for this sort of this half Sith/half Jedi team.

    4. Re:Dooku/separatists by drik00 · · Score: 2

      >>1. Turned the force into a scientifically measurable thing. (Mitochondria^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H midi-chlorians) This destroys the mythico-religious symbolism, which was damned important in the later episodes.<<

      Yes, I agree wholeheartedly, but...

      >>2. Changed Obi-wan's master. In IV his master was Yoda. In I it was Qui-gon. Hmmm.<<

      Yoda teaches all the younger Jedi before they are taken in as Padawan's by full-fledged Jedi...and Yoda did take a personal interest in Anakin since he saw the danger, so it is possible that Yoda was much closer to Obi-wan after Qui-Gon's death, in order to keep an eye on Anakin and to help assist Obi-wan in what he knew was dangerous to do in the first place

      >>3. The movies don't even *look* related. How is Lucas going to explain the change in spacecraft design from I and II to IV-VI? The nice thing about SW was that the spacecraft were very polygon-oriented in design, not curvaceous. It looked more *real* compared to modern technology.<<

      Lucas did explain this. Simply put, Ep I is of a different time period, a different way of thinking. Especially on Naboo, but otherwise, doesnt Obi-wan say in Ep IV that "it was a simpler time" when giving Luke the lightsabre? The original trilogy is a time of conflict, rebellion and unease...in times like that people tend to worship function over form (ie Millenium Falcon)...when at peace, form is desired over function.

      >>4. The dialog in the fight scenes in IV-VI made the fights more "human"... it gave the fights meaning instead of just fighting for the fighting. There wasn't any of this in I.<<

      In Ep IV, there were three Jedi alive that we know of, so not including Yoda, the only Jedi fight scene we see have volumes of meaning behind them:
      a. Vader/Kenobi, we know how much history there is there;
      b. Vader/Luke, damn, he's telling him he's his father, there's gonna be some banter going on in that conflict;
      c. Vader/Luke(Ep VI), same sort of thing as the first fight, except the Emperor is there to try to turn Luke;

      ...in Ep I, you had two Jedi fight who did not know each other, hence, what did they really have to say to each other?? would you really have preferred Obi-wan to scream "YOU KILLED MY MASTER!!" a la old kung-fu movies? ;)

      >>5. Obi-wan was humble in IV, and it seemed in the original trilogy, the example of a Jedi was a quiet, thoughtful warrior. In I, the Jedi were arrogant, and violence was the first choice, rather than using problem-solving thought process. There was not much "I don't want to fight" and a lot of "I'm going to kick your fscking ass."<<

      Sure, Obi-wan was humble in Ep IV, he was old, he'd had years to study and become closer to the force, the same reason Yoda is always so chilled out. In Ep I, you tend to neglect the notion that Obi-wan was the student, he was young and brash

      >>6. Jar-Jar Binks. Enough said.There lies the problems. Lucas should have let fans create the prequels. I guarantee they would have done a better job.<<

      yeah, Jar Jar sucked...I felt IQ points being sucked out of my head as I watched him in Ep I. The fans couldnt have created the prequels, however, because it was George's story, he already had the idea in his head, for the most part...stretching it over 3 prequels to simply tell background is a stretch maybe...we'll see, i personally think Ep II is gonna kick ass.

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    5. Re:Dooku/separatists by Alpha+State · · Score: 2

      1. Turned the force into a scientifically measurable thing. (Mitochondria^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H midi-chlorians) This destroys the mythico-religious symbolism, which was damned important in the later episodes.

      This is not mentioned in episode II.

      2. Changed Obi-wan's master. In IV his master was Yoda. In I it was Qui-gon. Hmmm.

      I believe Qui-gon died before Obi-wan became a fully fledged Jedi. In any case why is it not possible to have more than 1 master?

      3. The movies don't even *look* related. How is Lucas going to explain the change in spacecraft design from I and II to IV-VI? The nice thing about SW was that the spacecraft were very polygon-oriented in design, not curvaceous. It looked more *real* compared to modern technology.

      Any reason he has to? Maybe it's the influence of imperialist thinking, and the desperation of the alliance to come up with workable designs. I doubt Lucas will bother to explain it (nor should he).

      4. The dialog in the fight scenes in IV-VI made the fights more "human"... it gave the fights meaning instead of just fighting for the fighting. There wasn't any of this in I.

      Having had some training in swordfighting, I doubt I'd be saying much. Darth maul obviously just wasn't much of a conversationalist.

      5. Obi-wan was humble in IV, and it seemed in the original trilogy, the example of a Jedi was a quiet, thoughtful warrior. In I, the Jedi were arrogant, and violence was the first choice, rather than using problem-solving thought process. There was not much "I don't want to fight" and a lot of "I'm going to kick your fscking ass."

      Obi-wan is much older in episode IV, in fact I think his development in edpisode 2 is quite interesting. It's true the Jedi are more active and violent, but in the first trilogy they are desperately hiding from the Empire, not masters of all they survey. There is actually a comment in AOTC about the jedi having become arrogant.

      6. Jar-Jar Binks. Enough said.There lies the problems. Lucas should have let fans create the prequels. I guarantee they would have done a better job.

      I'm sure they couldn't have even made a coherent movie, let alone have complied with every tine continuity detail. And Jar-jar is only in AOTC to screw up royally in the senate, he doesn't even get any slapstick in.

      In short, having seen AOTC I think it is much better than TPM, especially from the viewpoint of a fan of the original trilogy. It has some flaws, the "romantic" scenes in particular are pretty ordinary - I almost thought I was watching Dawson's Creek at one point. I also think they could have come up with a better title. Nothing's going to satisfy the die-hard fans, but it's a very enjoyable movie.

    6. Re:Dooku/separatists by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      Having had some training in swordfighting, I doubt I'd be saying much.

      Oh come now... I've had some training in swordfighting too, and I *love* Princess Bride-style conversation during swordplay, don't you? :)

      I'll take your recommendation on AOTC. Though I still think that's gotta be the lamest name it could have. "The Clone War" would have been much better.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    7. Re:Dooku/separatists by Alpha+State · · Score: 2

      Oh come now... I've had some training in swordfighting too, and I *love* Princess Bride-style conversation during swordplay, don't you? :)

      Fun maybe, but definately not advisable when facing a lightsabre wielding maniac. But then they are not supposed to be super-realistic movies, the problem with knowing about these things is that I find myself thinking "I would have stabbed him in the left lung just about there".

      I'll take your recommendation on AOTC. Though I still think that's gotta be the lamest name it could have. "The Clone War" would have been much better.

      I wouldn't call it a fantastic movie (apart from the FX), but I wouldn't let a hate of TPM stop you from seeing it.

    8. Re:Dooku/separatists by bonius_rex · · Score: 2
      >spacecraft were very polygon-oriented in design, not curvaceous. It looked more *real* compared to modern

      If you look at what WWII era fighter planes looked like compared with a modern-day F-15, you'll see the same curve to polygon evolution over roughly the same time period.

    9. Re:Dooku/separatists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I still think that's gotta be the lamest name it could have. "The Clone War" would have been much better.



      Well, 'The Clone Wars' are still a ways off. If you will remeber in Episode IV it is mentioned that all of the Jedi were slaughtered in 'The Clone Wars', leading one to believe that this is simply the first introduction of the Clones.

      The Clones will play a big part in Episode III and will be wielded by Emperor Palpatine in an extension of the chain of events that he obviously set rolling a decade before AOTC.



      Because of Palpatines clever deception (due to the fact that the dark side can use the pre-cogniscent properties of the force, thereby clouding the Jedi's view of the future) the senate approves the use of an army that he will use to reign by fear with in the decades to come(Storm Troopers).



      So calling this movie 'The Clone Wars' would be premature, however I do agree the current title is weak, does not reflect the main purpose of the story, and allows one to easily misinterpret the events of the film.

    10. Re:Dooku/separatists by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

      First of all, I think you're dead on with 1, 4 and 6. But I believe 5 is intentional, and seeing what Lucas is doing here actually makes TPM watchable for me in spite of the the flat acting.

      Padme abandons diplomacy for war. Qui Gon attacks Maul (and dies). Obi Wan is rash and impulsive. And we don't even get the happy ending until everyone (including Jar Jar) is literally "disarmed".

      So it doesn't surprise me that the Jedi are giving way to arrogance and violence. They HAVE to for the first trilogy to make thematic sense. What surprises me is that reviewers continue to interpret the film as some bland battle between Good and Bad guys instead of understanding that Jedi and Sith are simply allegorical representations of love and hatred, etc..

    11. Re:Dooku/separatists by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      Hmmm... you're right. I'll officially strike that one from my list.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    12. Re:Dooku/separatists by clacke · · Score: 1
      The answer to point 5 is given by the late Obi-Wan himself in the swamps of tESB:

      "Was I any different when you taught me?"

    13. Re:Dooku/separatists by Xenex · · Score: 2

      "...AOTC. Though I still think that's gotta be the lamest name it could have. "The Clone War" would have been much better"

      At the very end of the movie, Yoda says "Begun this Clone War has".

      The title 'The Clone War' would be have been more fitting for Episode 3 then 2, however it obviously will not be the title now due to itbeing too damn similar to 'Attack of the Clones'.

      Lucas has said that Episode 3 is going to be dark, so I'm guessing the name will be more like 'The Fall of the Jedi' or something. The simple fact of the matter is that Lucus uses pretty simple Episode names.

  19. Problem with Lucas by Llywelyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the problems I am seeing is that Lucas is attempting to back-reference *everything* in Episodes 4-6 and a few other things that cropped up in the Star Wars Universe.

    So C3P0 and R2D2 come about when, in truth, there is no need for them. Fett's story is (re)created and explained (why not just use the story that was originally given and leave it out of the movies?), &c, &c.

    He would likely have more luck if he wouldn't attempt to throw in everything for everyone and just try to write a story.

    I will reserve judgment on this movie until I see it, however, some of the things that Lucas has been doing with the story in an effort to make it widely appeal are just frustrating.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    1. Re:Problem with Lucas by cei · · Score: 2
      Yeah, there is a bit of a problem with the back-references... "Hey, C-3P0 has been living with Shmi who's married to Owen Lars' father, but when he buys the droids from the Jawas in Ep IV he's clueless!"

      Maybe he didn't recognize 3P0 in gold... Yeah, that's the ticket.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    2. Re:Problem with Lucas by Captain+Smooth · · Score: 1

      Well, as I used to be REALLY into SW Expanded Universe, I can tell you that Luke's calling Owen "uncle" is akin to a boy calling his dad's best friend "Uncle Jimmy". Owen is Obi-Wan Kenobi's half brother, he sent Luke to live their after he sent Leia to Alderann.

      --


      The ability to monopolize an industry is insignificant, next to the power of the source.
    3. Re:Problem with Lucas by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Sounds good, but wrong. (I've read the novelizations, he's Anakin's step brother.)

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  20. Yippee! by BlueFall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't been this excited about a novelization since I read the Stargate book for a class. Seriously though in that class, even the jocks were complaining about the literary validity of the book. When will the madness stop?

  21. Way Back by christurkel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just before Mr. Salvatore broke big, he was a guest at a convention I was running (ConFusion in Massachusetts) and he is a nice guy and writes passable enough novels but let's give him a break. Look at the material he has to work with. I'm not surprised it's bad.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:Way Back by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Further to this, his fame was forged with The Crystal Shard and further books, largely due to the skill with which he developed the Drizzt character. The extremely detailed descriptions of combat were strengths of that work, and very enjoyable for those who like that sort of thing. I'm one of those people, so I don't think that is a negative.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  22. Lucas's problem: Plot Does Matter. by boyko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With the caveat that I haven't seen EpII yet, I think that it comes down to a simple fact: Lucas is too excited about using digital toys to produce a vision than he is about the actual storyline and character development. You had to admit, Episode I - and let's use this as a reference point - looked impressive, visually. The CGI was rendered in great detail - even Jar Jar Bink's movements seemed both organic and fluid. The problem is that he spent too much time with A) the Anakin subplot - and that's what it should have been - a subplot, B) Jar Jar Binks's antics. Essentially, he confused the comic relief with the main story. Now, say what you want about Lucas, but this is not Lucas. Star Wars (I will never call it Episode 4) had humor in it, but it was mostly from character *interaction* and exploitation of circumstance. You have the rough mercenary Han Solo dealing with the strong and politically motivated Leia... with each one in a contest to become the alpha male. You also have the exchanges between Threepio and Artoo, (and did anyone notice that it's Artoo, the one that communicated in blips and beeps, who plays the straightman in the comic venture?) You also have humor of circumstance - "I think i just blasted it." Even so, "Star Wars" characters can be very serious when the plot calls for it. This is where Lucas should have been focusing humor. Instead, he misapplies it - Jar Jar & Anakin, the pod racer announcer, etc. Instead, what does he do well. Well, from the trailers and the origional, I think he's doing the fight scenes well, and I think he's also showing the setting. Unfortunately, these aren't Lucas's hallmarks - they're the hallmarks of, perhaps Jackie Chan and Speilberg directly. Then again, maybe he *has* to emulate other directors. Remember, these plots weren't just developed to suit the fans - they were written before "Star Wars" was released. Let's face facts, Lucas developed the middle trilogy first because he thought it would be the best of the 3... No matter what, then, we should expect the plot of the prequels to be of an inferior quality. Lucas can only try to make this deficiency up by promising eye candy - perhaps why he is so adamant about having the digital projectors installed. That said, I'm sure that those who go to see Episode II for the lightsaber fights and the stunning CGI planet-scapes will enjoy it. But for those looking for plot, it's time to swallow back that taste of bile in your throat once again. Brian.

    1. Re:Lucas's problem: Plot Does Matter. by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree with you on this. When Lucas did the original trilogy (SW, Empire, and Jedi) he was a student of Joseph Campbell's and was writing a STORY deeply intwined with the monomyth.

      Now with ILM at his side, he is placing much more emphasis on the CGI stuff. There is still much of the monomyth in Eps I, just as I'm sure there is in Eps II, but THERE WERE NO FART JOKES IN THE ORIGINAL TRILOGY... Jar-Jar is one big fart joke and hugely deminished the quality of the movie.

      The original trilogy had no Fart jokes, instead it was a much more serious movie. If the original trilogy was comprised of fart jokes it would have gone away never to be heard of again like the D&D movie, another huge fart joke. In order for a fart joke movie to be funny, the whole thing needs to be funny... ie. Shrek.

      But now I ramble... I should go get ready... I'm going to go see a special charity screening of Eps. II. So for all of you watching a low-res version on your computer :-p I'm gonna go see it on the big screen.
      -Chris

    2. Re:Lucas's problem: Plot Does Matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of a paragraph you stupid motherfucker?

    3. Re:Lucas's problem: Plot Does Matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing that bothers me is that when we see episode I and II back in 15 or 20 years the special effects are going to look soooo crappy, just like those in the original star wars do now (even with the added special effects it still looks dated). But where Star Wars Ep 4 was actually a good movie (due to good storyline, decent script, moderately well performed acting, and so on), Episode I wasn't, and II will most likely be sick of the same illness. So you'll have movies that are visually unappealing, that have almost zero plot, poor acting (yoda comes across as the best actor in ep. I, and he's just a dummy), lousy dialogue. Movies so bad that all they'll be good for is developing a cult following.

      It's sad that lucas wanted more money after the first three movies. As someone else said: "Star wars used to be a perfectly fine childhood memory". I agree with that wholeheartedly. The prequels are ruining the saga. I hate George Lucas, and I hate the Star Wars fans that begged him to make these prequels.

      Btw, pet peeve about episode I:
      Lucas did lightsaber fights in brightly lit area's over and over. What an incredible dumbass-category mistake. Lightsabers only look really cool in the twilight. Everybody knows that. Except Lucas apparently.

  23. Another idea by Chardish · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the same plot information even quicker, simply read the Children's Movie Storybook. :)

    Thanks Lucas for making spoilers readily available before the film is even released.

    -Evan

    1. Re:Another idea by dimator · · Score: 2

      Thanks Lucas for making spoilers readily available before the film is even released.

      The cash cow ceases for no one!

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  24. Get the scholastic version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheaper - $6.00 - covered the story without dragging on - in the "annie goes dark side" the schoolastic version just did a cut scene - but you knew what happened. After your reveiw I'm glad I didnt get the hardback.
    Also - another poster mentioned zahn - salute! Zahn's triologies were awsome - if anyone has not read them and wants great star wars reading - get them. They had some of the clone war stuff in them - and i expected some of it to be in the book, like using the flying blue thingies as shields against the Jedi force, but that isn't in the book - maybe in the movie? or the next movie for the real clone war?

  25. othello. by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    the beast of two backs

    that was my favorite part of othello.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:othello. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my favorite part too. In a high school class of accelerated english, there were only about 3 of us who knew what that meant.

  26. Look on the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By reading the book based on the movie you don't have to deal with all the horrible acting of the new movie, and besides with all of the trailers it was easy visualize everything anyway.

    Did anyone else notice that not a single good thing comes out of this book? It almost would make an excellent addition to the villains dragonlance series.

    1. Re:Look on the bright side... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      And how much "good" comes out of The Empire Strikes Back"?

      Luke gets his hand cut off, Han gets taken by Boba Fett, it ends on such a down note. That's what life is, a series of down endings...

      This movie paralles ESB very well, I think.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  27. Big Mistake by Myuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I read the Episode 1 book the second it came out, I now regret it. I am absolutely sure that if i hadnt have read the book, i would have liked the on screen movie a lot more.

    the problem is, is that there was a lot missing in the movie that was in the book.

    -another pod race
    -more character developement
    -better fight scenes

    plus, without the movie, there is no difference between the other books (shadows of the empire for example) and this one.

    i noticed that this one came out a week or two later than the other one did, tatical move perhaps?

    --

    forget it.
  28. I don't understand this at all. by repsoto · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Even though Obi-Wan seems to think that Anakin might get himself into trouble, but is overruled by the Jedi Council, who don't seem to realize that a barely 20-year-old man with raging hormones around Natalie Portman might feel a little tempted.

    Well, I'm a 20-year-old man with raging hormones and *I* certainly don't feel tempted at all.

    OTOH, maybe it's because, unlike Anakin Skywalker, I am German and I definitely don't have the hots for someone born in Jerusalem, Israel.

    1. Re:I don't understand this at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you suck!

  29. Oh my god, You killed Chewie! You bastard!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget not that R.A. Salvatore killed Chewbecca in his wonderful novella "Vector Prime".
    Any further words from a man who killed such a harmless creature such as Chewie must be regarded as pure folly and discarded thereafter.

  30. Re:Lucas is dying! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    I dont like my theater, I want to put it out of business. On the other hand, for every thousand things LucasArts does, one or two of them is really great, so best to have another few bucks in the hands of lucas, rather than in the hands of my crappy movie theater. DIE theater!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  31. About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronology by ciurana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Greetings,

    A few posters in this thread complained that Lucas may be trying to fill too much backstory in the current Star Wars I-III movies, that the continuity isn't there, or that there is too much detail. To all of you, I would advise you to read the novel "Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker", by George Lucas, written in the 1970's. A new edition was printed in the 1990's, tied with the re-release of the movies.

    A lot of the backstory that Lucas refers to today in the movies is explained in a one page prologue "written by Senator Leia Organa" of Alderaan. The Trade Federation, Emperor Palpatine, the Clone Wars, Skywalkers' abilities as pilots running in the family, the relationship between Luke Skywalker and Biggs (who is jarring in the movie because they greet like old friends in Yavin-4 but viewers don't know *why*), etc. are all mentioned in that book.

    The Star Wars movie novelizations of the first trilogy were better written, and in the case of Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back they add significant backstory that explains why some things happen the way they do in the movie. So far The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones seem to adhere to that chronology.

    There are also a few glaring discrepancies that are later kludged to fix (i.e. like Darth Vader being Luke's father), but they are forgivable in the context of the whole saga. One of the most important ones is that in Star Wars, Tatooine is an unimportant planet in the outer rim of the galaxy, yet it's in every movie except for TESB. Lots of things going on in that little, unimportant planet. Finally, there are a few screenplay drafts (for the original Star Wars movie) written by Lucas that you can find on the 'Net, that also provide interesting backstory.

    I mention this because a lot of people don't realize that what Mr. Lucas has been saying all along, that he had the underpinnings of the story worked out long ago, is probably true. Read the book, and then make judgement.

    My copy of "Star Wars" is in Spanish (the Editorial Argos Vergara Edition, "La Guerra de las Galaxias" of 1977-78) and I left it in my native country, so I'm quoting by memory here. I read it at least 30 times when I was 11 or so, and I remember the prologue quite well because it didn't say the same things as the yellow scroll at the beginning of the movie. I tried Google-ing for a reference to this prologue but couldn't find one. Can someone transcribe it or post a link?

    (Also, there was a Star Wars book that chronicled the first duel between Vader and Skywalker published in 1978 or 1979 titled The Mind's Eye, by Alan Dean Foster. I have a copy back home, but I've never seen it in the US. That story takes place at some point between Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back; it explored some interesting backstory issues but didn't hint of Vader being Skywalker's father.)

    As far as novelizations from the movies (or from the screenplays), Star Wars by George Lucas and The Empire Strikes Back (I don't remember the author) were probably the best. The Mind's Eye by A. D. Foster was excellent, and it made me wonder if it had been a screen treatment at some point. The novelization of Return of the Jedi *sucked*, and I never bothered to read more than one the books not based on the movies because they don't capture the essence of the story the way Lucas' stories/movies do.

    Cheers!

    E
    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  32. I got two words for you NAZI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ho
    Mo

  33. Watch those assumptions by pete-classic · · Score: 2

    Emperor^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Supreme Chancellor Palpatine

    Do we have any real degree of certainty that Supreme Chancellor Palpatine, Emperor Palpatine, and Darth Sidious are the same person . . . ?

    Everything that follows is nothing more that a wild ass guess on my part.

    My guess is that Sidious cloned himself (with modifications to make the clone a sniveling weakling) and manipulated him into the big chair and is going to disappear him in EP3: The Chickens Come Home to Roost (tCCHtR).

    I mean, come on. No matter how "difficult to see, the dark side is" the amount of time he spends around Jedi in EP1 and 2 would have to cause a tremor or two if Sidious and Palpatine were one and the same.

    Oh, and there is no immaculate conception . . . Anikin is a clone that was planted (and implanted) by . . . someone. I'll go out on a limb and guess that it was Sidious.

    But my SWAGs have been wrong in the past. I was sure that Kitster was going to end up Boba Fett.

    Finally, if all you have to say is along the lines "Lucas is a tool, Jar-Jar sucks, Lucas is out of touch with his fans, he just wants to sell lunch boxes and play with digital toys, etc" why don't you check the "Star Wars Prequels" box on your homepage preferences? I'm glad you have an opinion, but you aren't adding anything to the discussion. It is trollish, and amounts to crapfloding at this point.

    -Peter

    1. Re:Watch those assumptions by cei · · Score: 1

      I would have given the whole "Palpatine and/or Sidious is a clone" theory more thought except for the fact that the red imperial guards are clearly shown in Palpatine's office in two scenes. That kinda nails the succession in my mind (well, along with the fact that Palpatine is more clearly maniuplating things in EpII).

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    2. Re:Watch those assumptions by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      Well, the succession is clear, there is no doubt that Palpatine is ostensibly the Emperor. But that's just my point. Sidious can just slide in there, and the genetic ID* matches, so he just needs to make sure Palpatine doesn't, uh, resurface.

      I think that red senate guards -> Imperial guards is good reasoning, but red Senate guards -> Palpatine is not a clone is quite a stretch.

      The line where he tells Anikin that he doesn't need guidance is a bigger hole.

      Except that he would, by virtue of his genetics, be strong in the force as well (though clearly not trained). And if Anikin were, say, his biological son, he might be drawn to him without any alterer motive. And his temperament would still be like Sidious. Everything is proceeding as he has foreseen it ;-)

      Beyond that the book goes on about how comfortable Anikin is with him, like they are peers in spite of the fact that Palpatine is leader of the free galaxy. Who is more your peer than your biological twin . . . ?

      Also note that Lucas says that he likes to "riff" or do variations on a theme. A corny example is "I have a bad feeling about this." I think there is going to be a deeper parallel, like this:

      Jango Fett = Sidious: The "source"
      Boba Fett = Anikin: The "pure clone" (or "favorite son")
      Clone Army = Palpatine: The "impure clones" (or "utility clones")

      This will only make sense if you have read the book or seen the movie.

      -Peter

      * Of course, "natural" clones would not have the same finger prints, etc. But with the technology involved here I'm sure Sidious (and the Kaminoans?) could overcome this.

    3. Re:Watch those assumptions by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      Of course, "natural" clones would not have the same finger prints, etc. But with the technology involved here I'm sure Sidious (and the Kaminoans?) could overcome this.

      Since the whole thing takes place in a DIFFERENT GALAXY THAN OURS your assumption that their race would share particulars with humans such as unique fingerprints is ridiculous on its face.

    4. Re:Watch those assumptions by cei · · Score: 2

      Ok, I see where you're going with it. It makes sense (haven't read the book, but I've watched the movie 6 or 7 times already (no I'm not a fanboy or a pirate, doing QC for digital cinema is my job...))

      I like how they emphasize lineage of the training... Yoda trained Dooku who trained Qui Gon Jin who trained Obi-Wan who trained Anakin. I'd still be curious where Sidious's training came from. Also unclear in the film is who exactly ordered the clones. The Kaminoans say a Jedi Master ordered them, but when Obi-Wan reports back to Yoda and Mace, he expresses his belief that that particular master had been dead when the order was placed. We think Dooku was against the Republic at that point, since he was in aliance with the Trade Federation, but did Palpatine/Sidious himself place the order or was there another pawn involved?

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    5. Re:Watch those assumptions by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      Well, sure. Except that it is an allegory.

      Okay, I hate to sound like an English major (which I'm not), but here we go.

      We have mitochondria, not midichloirians. And they don't whisper the will of the Force at us (at least as far as you know :-P ).

      But, because the story is really about us, things work the same in the story as they do for us, in the absence of a symbolic or plot reason for something scientific to work differently.

      And think about it, which is an easier Sci-Fi sell; that (identical) twins long ago in a galaxy far, far away have identical finger prints, or that in this society where cloning is a given the technology exists to make a more "perfect" clone?

      Star Wars looks like our own future, and is described as someone else's past, but it is about our present.

      -Peter

    6. Re:Watch those assumptions by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      Hmm. I haven't seen the movie yet. The Kaminoan, Lama Su, gives up the name (rot13s to Fvsb-Qlnf) in the book, but I don't recall anyone on the council claiming he was dead at the time the order was placed.

      -Peter

    7. Re:Watch those assumptions by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      Isn't it commonly believed that that name Sifo-Dyas (no secrecy really required), or Sido-Dyas (not certain on that consonant) , is just a corruption of Sidious?

    8. Re:Watch those assumptions by cei · · Score: 1

      Hadn't thought about that. Good one. The pronuciation is a little odd in the film so I hadn't really connected to Sidious.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    9. Re:Watch those assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the connection between Sifo Dyas and Sidious was fairly obvious. Still trying to figure out why so many people would bother to speculate about a move that is 4 days away from the time they write about it.

      PM was disapointing, but most of the PM attacks that I've read were simply illogical, failing to follow through with the facts. Some people are just dieing to hate Star Wars I think. I've seen 3 year olds watch PM, and the only thing they like about it is Jar Jar. The same people who got off on the Ewoks when they were ten now want to burn Jar Jar at the stake. The best condemnation about PM I've read was "4-6 where about good overcoming evil, PM was about taxes". Most of the so called plot holes are bs in my opinion. But the movie spent a great deal of time with an extended saber fight, extended pod race and droid battle which were too drawn out, taking to much screen time.

      All of the anti AOTC seems to be similarly bogus. Ironically, the critics are are criticising rumors and nonsense. Why write an crappy condemnation about something you haven't seen?

      I also thought the book version of AOTC was very poorly written, but I didn't see any 15 page fight scenes and didn't really think that things were overly described.

  34. Dark Elf books by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Salvatore wrote the Dark Elf series of books in D&D's Forgotten Realms setting. I believe there are over three trilogies by now. When I was 13 years old, I found them actually quite good... that's probably because it was his target audience.

    But then I recently picked up one of the latest Dark Elf books... ech. I couldn't get into it. The writing was just too bad. I guess this is what age does to you. The Star Wars books really aren't targetted at intelligent late-20 or 30-somethings. They're for teens who like D&D and Dragonlance (and adults who never grew out of it).

    One thing I will give kudos to Salvatore for: he has a talent for describing fight scenes. I think the reviewer found this annoying, but that aspect of his books has traditionally been their saving grace: if you want to read a book of detailed fight scenes with a bit of plot in-between, pick up a Salvatore book. Remember my "13 year old" audience theory -- flowery writing and complex plots aren't necessarily cool to most. Lots of fights are. Not too many of my friends liked Tolkien in high school, but there sure were a lot of Dragonlance fans.

    No doubt for a series like Star Wars, this probably looked like a good choice on paper.

    --
    -Stu
    1. Re:Dark Elf books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Icewind Dale trilogy, Dark Elf trilogy, the four Underdark wrap-ups, and then a slew of books while they chase a very troubled Wulfgar up and down the Sword Coast. It's interesting to continue following the characters, but the writing hasn't improved much since Crystal Shard despite all his practice. The energy and creativity seem to have gone, though :-(


      At least the non-TSR books seem to be better (although I haven't read them all yet).

  35. novelization take to extreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've always thought it rather silly to novelize a movie, Episode II being no expection. But the most peculiar novelization of all involves the World War II movie A BRIDGE TOO FAR. The movie was based on Cornelius Ryan's best selling book of the same title. The movie did reasonably well at the box office.

    One day when browsing the newstand at the grocery story I came across a book called "A Bridge Too Far". But it was not the same book which Cornelius Ryan had written; in fact it was written by a completely different author. There on the cover under the title was a statement saying that this book was based on the movie "A BRIDGE TOO FAR". So there you have it: book -> movie -> book.

  36. "Don't bash Jews, bash Homos"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You hypocritical moron.



    Tell me something, if you can get your primitive hind-brain to function on
    the level of such coherent thought: why is it Bad and Wrong for the Hitler
    Crew to spew their prejudicial invectives against blacks and Jews, but
    it's perfectly peachy for you drooling mouthbreathers to spout -your-
    prejudicial invectives against gays?


    Of course I don't support Hitler Crew's infantile neo-Nazi
    nonsense. But I am equally disgusted by the fools who react to racism
    with homophobia and somehow think they're morally superior because of it.

    Hope this helps!

  37. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book you are referring to by Alan Dean Foster is known as "Splinter of the Mind's Eye", and is readily available in the US.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/034532023 9/ qid=1021225579/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_67_1/102-9418279-38 74538

    6.99 from amazon.

    Cheap!

  38. Funny Change... by Qwerpafw · · Score: 1
    at the advice of Emperor^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Supreme Chancellor Palpatine
    lol! Either thats a hilarious mistake with cntrl-h and deletage, or its clever and purposeful way of saying "Emperor, wait, i mean supreme chancellor Palpatine" :D

    But seriously, who the heck would want to read the book before the movie? Especially since the book was based on the movie (rather than the other way around)... its just plain plot spoilage. I guess you could make the argument that the book is faster to download than the movie (assuming pirated copies of both), but thats about it.

    The movie looks to be decent. Thus, I will wait until it comes out to see it. I will not read a cheesy version of the script, written so it looks like a novel (but is really just the script. I mean, its kind of obvious when a "book" includes choreography...)

    But this seems like a brilliant way to make money for Lucas. All he had to do was give the script for the movie to some schmoe author and say "Remove the stage directions, and make it look like a novel." No work, and I am sure they'll get some decent royalties from people buying the book to get a preview of the movie.
    1. Re:Funny Change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...you've never seen that usage of ^H before? It's quite common. Heck, it's even in the jargon file.

  39. Even MORE of a Major movie plot ****SPOILER**** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dooku and Palpatine are in cahoots. They are the two Sith Lords.

    Its all a big set-up so that Palpatine(Sidious), whos is now Supreme Chancellor, can declare martial law, wield emergency power over the Republic and hold it for as long as the "imaginary" Republic-Seperatist War lasts.

  40. Fight Scenes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As far as Salvatores description of the fight scenes, some of us enjoy them. My girlfriend bought me this book for my birhtday, and having been a previous fan of Salvatores work the first thing I thought was 'I cant wait to see how he writes the sabre battles.' He did the same thing throughout the Dark Elf trilogy, and it has certainly sold well.

  41. Boba Fett and the lost history by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whaat? Now hold on here folks. What really did happen with Boba Fett? My readings up to now indicate that he was a deposed journeyman protectorate that got kicked out for he turned in one of his clients due to the bounty that was on his/hers/its head. But nooooo.. Now ole George has him as a clone now.. Hooboy, i'll bet the bookwriters are ripping their hair out trying to get this sorted out on WHY he went off the beaten path that was already laid in front of him on Boba's past... Help me clear some of this air up, hey?

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    1. Re:Boba Fett and the lost history by Warin · · Score: 1

      Remember this:

      A few years back, Lucas issued an edict on producing anything pre ANH... specifically to avoid continuity problems. And at the same time basically said 'It's my universe, I reserve the right to change it around as I like'

      So if it's pre ANH, it's not canonical... according to the guy who owns it all.

  42. Book violence less graphic than movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As I watched (reviewing ;^) the bootleg version of the movie this morning all I could think of was "How can this movie not get an R rating?"

    /.ers out there with kids (or those thinking of taking young children to the movie) beware!

    * Beheadings
    * Arms cut off sans blood
    * Monsters eating 'people'
    * A village massacre (implied women/children too)
    * Soldiers/Jedi knights killed various ways
    * A boy holding his "father's" head!

    Personally, this movie was an amalgamation of Braveheart, Gladiator, Jurassic Park, 5th Element, all previous Star Wars movies, and Lord of the Rings. Needless to say I was extremely disappointed and glad I didn't waste my money.

    See the movie before taking the kids and you'll see what I mean. Lucas must have tremendous power in Hollywood with his 1 trick pony.

    1. Re:Book violence less graphic than movie? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      Kids have a stronger stomach than that. Watched LOTR1 again at the $2 theater, and that was 10 times more frightning and violent than AOTC. One of the salvations of Lucas' incompetent writing is that nothing he shows ever appears very realistic. For example, the kid was obviously holding his father's helmet. Jackson worked much harder at making the violent sequences look less clean, and I can tell you, many of the children in the theater were honestly freaked out.

      I think the biggest danger you incur when you go see AOTC is that your optic nerve might be severed from constant involuntary eye-rolling brought on by the terrible dialogue and battle sequences in AOTC. (Spoiler for parents: Please tell them that if someone ever confesses to them they slaughtered a village of innocent children, they should react not by hugging them and telling them it's OK, but by calling the police and making sure the perpetrator rots in jail. Yes, I'm looking at you, Ms. Ex-queen!)

    2. Re:Book violence less graphic than movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you surprised? Another jewish hump-buddy of Lucas, Spielberg got away with the same shit in Private Ryan. Easily the most grotesque onscreen presentation of war...regardless of context, it should have had an NC-17 rating.

  43. Book vs Movie cost by Sancho · · Score: 2

    Well the theater we have in town (College Station, Texas) is still $6.50 for a ticket. But I also managed to snag the book for half price at our local Hastings :) I thought it was worth it, and a decent read overall, although the poster is absolutely correct on the overkill and (at times) underkill.

  44. Let he who casts the first stone... by Murgos · · Score: 1

    "...sci-fi fiction..."

    Is this like the rule where any post correcting anothers grammer or spelling, invariably contains an obvious error in grammer or spelling?

    If you are going to critic another persons writing for being full of redundant descriptive passages shouldn't you be extra careful to not make the same mistake?

    1. Re:Let he who casts the first stone... by Fester213 · · Score: 1

      You too, mister "grammer" and "critic".

      --

      -- Fester
      "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows."
    2. Re:Let he who casts the first stone... by rlbmagus · · Score: 1
      *snip*

      invariably contains an obvious error in grammer or spelling?

      *snip*

      yup :-D

    3. Re:Let he who casts the first stone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

  45. Yawn... by crovira · · Score: 2

    Yawn ...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Stop..now you're making me Yawn...

      YAAAAWWWNNN

  46. As good as Back to the Future 2 (the book)? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

    I recall reading this fine peice of print (Back to the Future 2) for a book report in grade school. I'm shocked to see that it never made the NY times best seller list.

    Hopefully Star Wars Episode 2 will do better. Afterall, we all know books made about movies are typically some of the best reads... And books made about TV shows are usually even better!

    I imagine Star Wars Episode 2 (the book) will probably probably inspire a lot of grade school children to put forth that extra effort come book report time. It books like this that really boost comprehension and teach kids the joy of reading.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:As good as Back to the Future 2 (the book)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious?? Books made from movies in my opinion are generally far worse than the movie, and often suck in general.

      If I'm looking for a good read, I'll often get a book that's been made into a movie.

      Anon (because i'm too lazy to make an account)

  47. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by Arandir · · Score: 5, Informative

    the relationship between Luke Skywalker and Biggs (who is jarring in the movie because they greet like old friends in Yavin-4 but viewers don't know *why*)

    That was in the movie. It was in the first theater run of Star Wars. But the scene was cut out in additional runs, TV, VHS, DVD and the new digitally destroyed version.

    It was the first scene where we saw Luke. He was saying goodbye to Biggs, who was going off to join the rebellion.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  48. who gives a toss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its not history, it's a f*cking STORY - and not a great one either.

  49. Excellent fight scenes by revery · · Score: 2, Informative

    This will probably get flagged as offtopic, but here goes anyway:
    If you do want some really excellent fight scenes in a novel, (and no, I don't consider "In a blinding flash of steel it was over" to be a good fight), then you should check out Joel Rosenberg's Guardian's of the Flame series.

    The series list is as follows:
    The Sleeping Dragon
    The Sword and the Chain
    The Silver Crown
    The Heir Apparent
    The Warrior Lives
    The Road to Ehvenor
    The Road Home
    Not Exactly the Three Musketeers


    I've read through The Road to Ehvenor and felt that some of the strength of the novels had petered out around that point (Ehvenor was still good, just in a different way), but the first five books are phenomenal. The story is slick, the magic is interesting, the world and characters's grow over time and it definitely has a depth of humanity, but with all that, I think it was the fight's that did it for me.
    Anyway, if you have the money and the time, give them a chance, it's a wothwhile read.

    1. Re:Excellent fight scenes by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 2

      Thanks, I'll make a note of it. Tackling George R.R. Martin now...

      --
      -Stu
  50. Book not as bad by MaverickUW · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I bought the book when I first saw it in stores (along with some of the other merchandise). I took and read through it over the course of a day (Ever notice how books/movies get worse every time you try and analyze them too much (AKA Jon Katz)?). Obviously there was some sarcasm and added stuff in this review, but I personally thought the story was quite good. Though I'll admit I didn't read the Phantom Meanace Novilization. This isn't the author's first Star Wars story either, he also wrote Vector Prime, but no other starwars that I'm aware of. Reading the book (this was also 2 weeks ago when Starwars was much further away), made me even MORE excited to see the movie. People say the book is better when the movie is adapted from the book, but in this case, no matter how awesome my imagination is, I can't wait to see the Lucas vision for the movie. From the clips of the movie I've seen, the different characters I've seen action figures made of, just re-inforces this is going to be much more enjoyable in every way than Phantom Meanace was. Especially with only 5 minutes or so of Jar-Jar. BTW, for those who claimed he spoiled it about how Anikan turned to the darkside; I may not be anywhere near the biggest fan (haven't read most of the books and that), but I knew from the moment that they left Tattoine in the first movie that Anikan's turning would have to do with SPOILER WARNING FOR THOSE WHO DIDN'T READ IN THE LINES

    his Mother. Of course I thought Jedi would have to do with the accidental death of her and he'd get pissed off at them, but this works as well.

  51. Question by DreamingReal · · Score: 2
    Why do LucasFilm (and all other movie studios) threaten litigation against sites that post scripts, spoilers and screencaps prior to the movie release yet publish the novelisation weeks before the premiere?


    I swear, one day my head is going to explode from the cognitive dissonance of it all...

    --
    We want some answers and all that we get
    Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

    - Ministry
    1. Re:Question by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

      Because you pay cold-hard cash for the novelization.

      --
      >
    2. Re:Question by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      There's no dissonance here at all. Scripts, screencaps, etc. posted on the Web net LucasFilm $0. The novelization doesn't.

      It's all about the Benjamins.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  52. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by LMariachi · · Score: 1

    The scene with Biggs and Wormy? "Did a young noise just blast through here?" I don't recall that from the movie, and I saw it pretty much the day it came out. I do recall it from the screenplay and comic book, though, along with the original non-fat Jabba.

  53. Attack of the Clones Script and Trailers by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    Anyone want them? Click here. For the trailers, go to the main page and click "Downloads".

  54. So Does Acting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read this. Poor Lucas 2 stars

    http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/cst-ftr-eb er t10.html

  55. Re:Novels--SPOILERS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Strict continuity?

    Vader doesn't recognize R2 and 3PO even though the former is his beloved's favorite droid and he BUILT the latter--even able to recognize him with the shielding in place although it was his mother that put it there!?! Memory loss?

    Obviously, these two droids are destined to stay with Amidala and Vader doesn't recognize the significance that they ALSO follow Leia around!?! Memory loss?

    Uncle Owen grew up with 3PO and doesn't recognize him after Luke repairs him!?! Memory loss?

    3PO doesn't seem to recognize Tattoine or Uncle Owen!?! Memory loss?

    Obi-wan doesn't recognize either droids even though he spent a lot of time with them!?! Memory loss?

    AOTC is a continuity NIGHTMARE! I could see Lucasfilms having a difficult time resolving conflicts with third-party stories that weren't crafted by Lucas himself but I/II/IV/V/VI are!

  56. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by 3263827 · · Score: 1

    Actually, those scenes were filmed, but never, never, were in any theater run. This is a common folk tale.

    Also, the prologue to Star Wars, The First Saga of The Journal of The Whills, wasn't written by Leia Organa. She simply has a quote attached at the end.

  57. Original Star Wars novel prologue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Another galaxy, another time. The Old Republic was the Republic of legend, greater than distance or time. No need to note where it was or whence it came, only to know that... it was the Republic.

    Once, under the wise rule of the Senate and the protection of the Jedi Knights, the Republic throve and grew. But as often happens when wealth and power pass beyond the admirable and attain the awesome, then appear those evil ones who have greed to match.

    So it was with the Republic at its height. Like the greatest of trees, able to withstand any external attack, the Republic rotted from within though the danger was not visible from outside.

    Aided and abetted by restless, power-hungry individuals within the government, and the massive organs of commerce, the ambitious Senator Palpatine caused himself to be elected President of the Republic. He promised to reunite the disaffected among the people and to restore the remembered glory of the Republic.

    Once secure in office he declared himself Emperor, shutting himself away from the populace. Soon he was controlled by the very assistants and boot-lickers he had appointed to high office, and the cries of the people for justice did not reach his ears.

    Having exterminated through treachery and deception the Jedi Knights, guardians of justice in the galaxy, the Imperial governors and bureaucrats prepared to institute a reign of terror among the disheartened worlds of the galaxy. Many used the imperial forces and the name of the increasingly isolated Emperor to further their own personal ambitions.

    But a small number of systems rebelled at these new outrages. Declaring themselves opposed to the New Order they began the great battle to restore the Old Republic.

    From the beginning they were vastly outnumbered by the systems held in thrall by the Emperor. In those first dark days it seemed certain the bright flame of resistance would be extinguished before it could cast the light of new truth across a galaxy of oppressed and beaten peoples...

    From the First Saga Journal of the WhiIls

    1. Re:Original Star Wars novel prologue by ciurana · · Score: 2

      Hi, Anonymous!

      Thanks for the post.

      Cheers!

      E

      --
      http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  58. I would agree with you. by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

    If you substituted Salvatore with Douglas Niles. The Icewind Dale trilogy was a fun read when I first picked it up (I was ten). Dark Elf trilogy was a fun action packed read, it wasn't Ender's Game or LOTR but I wouldn't say it was toilet paper. To me Salavtore's book are comic books without pictures, meant to be fun with lot's of action. Not Tolkien reincarnate.

    Now Douglas Nile's stuff on the otherhand. For those who don't know he was or still is a author who wrote Forgotten Realms novels for TSR back in the day. I started to read the Moonshae Trilogy and I will tell you that I have literaly used the first book as TP. I was camping at the time, but somehow I thought it was appropriate.

    --
    >
  59. The character that dies is Chewbacca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

  60. R.A. Salvatore is a worthless hack by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

    I don't know why publishers let this man write books, much less books that are as important as this one. The man cannot write a coherent sentece to save his life. And you'd think, given his previous Star Wars track record (the way he killed off Chewbacca was insipid and insulting), Lucasfilm would have released the hounds on him rather than asking him to write the Episode II novelization.

  61. Salvatore is sticking to his strengths by painfall · · Score: 1

    If you have ever read some of his books, you would know that Salvatore specializes in fight scenes. Since the story has quite a weak plot (and changing the story would be highly frowned upon) I'm unsure how else he could make this story over 60-70 pages.

  62. The Phantom Menace by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what entity is refered to when Lucas talks of the Phantom Menace? The Dark Side? Perhaps there is some yet unrevealed entity influencing the entire Star Wars universe subtly from the shadows. The Jedi and the Sith are merely pawns in a multidimensional struggle between the Yin and Yang of The Force. The Jedi and Sith are nothing more than channelers for the manifestations of these 2 warring continui. (plural of continuum?)

    I agree with earlier posters. The magic is gone with the Star Wars series. EP1's visual polish only helped to further distance it from Ep4-6's feel. I like the older, grainier look of the original trilogy. It presented a harsh, gritty reality of dirty spaceports and slimy aliens and people struggling to get overcome ridiculous odds. What's Episode 1? Gloss and polish and render farm fmv. Those guys worked their asses off to make 4-6 using PHYSICAL models of everything! What's Episode 1? An air-conditioned office full of dweebs trying to get Jar-Jar's skin to be sufficiently flappy.

    It'll be nice if the new movie recaptures some of the heart of 4-6, but I think the odds are not favorable. End Rant.

    1. Re:The Phantom Menace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL!

      "The Jedi and Sith are nothing more than channelers for the manifestations of these 2 warring continui. (plural of continuum?)"

      Oh, you mean the Arisians and the Eddorians?

      Well, *maybe* Luke can make Lensman, but
      second stage Lensman?

      mark "where's my DeLamiter?"

      (Oh, for those with no clue, the Original Space Opera writer - Doc Smith, and the Lensman series.

  63. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
    "Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker", by George Lucas

    This novel was, IIRC, ghost-written by Alan Dean Foster, but published under Lucas' name. While it does provide more back-story than the movies, it also has been contradicted by some of the later additions to the saga.

    Slighlty OT: My personal favorite line in the novel is the part where Obi-Wan refers to being "sitting ducks", and Luke asks "What's a duck?". So incongruous with the way the rest of the story was written, but all the more amusing because of that :-)

  64. you're all freaks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares...really...who cares...

    george is going to keep making films...

    you are all going to keep complaining...

    he is going to make millions...

    you are not...

    what is your point? all of you...

    i like star wars because it's dumb, silly, change-the-rules-as-you-go, FUN. do you know what that means? do any of you? how about, 'so it might suck...i'll go see it'. the thing i love about this site is you slash-dipshits stripping away as much of the joy from something as you possibly can....

    analyze it all you want boys and girls...talk about how it has nothing to do with the books all you want. because, LUCASFILM, does not give a rats ass what you think or how they should make their movies. kapeesh?

    here's some good logic...

    if you think the first one sucked, then i can almost 100% guarantee that you're not going to like the second one. and you'll still complain. then DON'T GO SEE EP II.

    if you like star wars because of the characters, ships, droids, and PURE CHILDISH FUN, then go see it and shut up.

    geezus heysoos marimba - LOTSA smart people come here...but you seriously LACK imagination.

    that is all...

  65. My predictions: by simm_s · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the beginning (episodes 4-6), Star Wars was just a simple story about a boy, a princess, a privateer, a wookie, a sith lord, etc. Now it has evolved into a complicated mess which everyone is over analyzing to death.

    Here are my predictions for episode 2:
    disclaimer: I list myself as a moderate fan who has seen episode 4,5,6 a gizzilan times on TV 4,5,6 special edition once, christmas special once, and episode 1 twice.

    There will be tons of boring dialog consiting of wooden actors and tons of soul-less computer generated aliens used to replicate the puppet mastery of 70s.

    The love between the princess and anakin will be completely fabricated and unrealistic. Probably using the tired forbidden love motif we have all seen before.

    Scenes with Jarjar will be minimized (obvious point) given the negative feedback from episode I.

    There will be another unbelievable car chase scene to prove that anakin is a greatest starfighter pilot ever. ho-hum.

    There will be another intense lightsaber duel with a gimmic like the dual bladed light saber seen in episode one.

    We will learn more about yoda demistifing the character making him/her/it less interesting IMHO.

    Will do well at the box office. Which is George Lucas' primary goal anyway.

    Will leave most hardcore fans secretly disappointed but unphased since they will see episode 3.

    Most moderate fans will force themselves to enjoy the film just becasue it is Star Wars.

    Playa haters will hate it no matter how good or bad it is just because it is popular.

    1. Re:My predictions: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez man, can't you tell us something we don't already know by watching the trailers. Thanks for regurgitating that stuff!

  66. Natalie Portman... by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
    ...Unclothed and paralyzed with fear. Either that, or we get to see Jar Jar set on fire.

    Clearly it's something that Lucas owes the fan community after that travesty of an episode 1. Which one is portrayed in the book?

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  67. Re:Novels--SPOILERS!!! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    On the droids, while the driod's names and the fact that the droids don't remember the people is rather implausable, I would guess that they are more ubiquitous than we imagine, more like cars. While you certainly remember all the makes and models of cars you have owned, unless it had a very unique dent pattern or model (if its a ferrari you are much more likely to see only a few in your life), I challenge you to recognise your exact car in 40 years.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  68. Re:Lucas is dying! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    Actually this is quite common, and has led to the blockbuster model that is so popular to movies these days. Studio's get a very high percentage of the take in the first week, and it drops down in following weeks. I had heard that first week cuts were in tne 80-90% range, but after the fourth week it is well below 50%. If anyone knows please let me know. Movies like Titanic and LotR are very popular with theatre owners becuase they get a lot more of the take. Movies like Jurassic park are better for the studios.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  69. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by ciurana · · Score: 2

    Gilead,

    I politely disagree with this view. The original Star Wars book reads still like a screenplay novelization. I wish A. D. Foster had a hand at it! The writing is much more lyric in The Mind's Eye than anything Lucas wrote. The brittle dialog in the book has Lucas' fingerprints all over it. Can you confirm the Foster rumour? I would be curious to discover Foster's take on the whole thing.

    Also: A. D. Foster's adaptation of Alien rocked.

    Cheers!

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  70. mmm Salvatore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've read several of R.A. Salvatore's books and I must say that this review was overly critical of him as an author. If you read any of his books you will know that Salvatore LOVES to write fight scenes, and he does them well. The content of the story wasn't Salvatore's to begin with, it was based off the screenplay (same with episode 1), so to say that Salvatore can't write a book, based on this review is ignorant.

    How about a point and counterpoint next time /. this review was horrible.

    1. Re:mmm Salvatore by Random+Feature · · Score: 2

      I read the book this past week and while I am generally a fan of Salvatore's work - not just for the fight scenes but for his character development - this book was written with a 3rd grade reading level in mind and was a horrible example of Salvatore's writing.

      He's much better than this and this is obviously just a hard copy of the script. THAT was a mistake. He could have done much more with it but I'm certain that there were restrictions upon him and so while this shouldn't reflect on Salvatore (on that I agree) it's still an awful example of literature in any form.

      --
      I don't have a solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
  71. "Splinter of the Mind's Eye"... by mjfgates · · Score: 1

    ... doesn't actually fit into the universe established by the movies. The aliens, the technology, the relationship between Leia and Luke, the presence of Darth Vader WITHOUT billions of stormtroopers... none of it matches. I thought it was rather odd even at the time I read it (1980 or so, before TESB released).

    I think that it's unique in this respect; later "Star Wars" novels seem to be carefully tucked into some sort of master plan.

  72. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by kevinank · · Score: 2

    Since I personally saw some of the scenes referred to at the opening of Star Wars at the Old Mill Six theatres in Palo Alto, I know that they are not pure folk tale. I don't know what print they had, but in that theater the first scene of the movie started on Tatooine with Luke looking through electronic binoculars at space, and then speeding into Tashi station to tell his friends (who were unenthusiastic).

    The NPR playhouse version adds quite a bit more backstory describing why the ships were there in the first place, and adding extra scenes with Biggs and a speeder canyon race.

    None of those were present in the version I saw, but I did see them tease Luke about Biggs, and there were several other changes throughout the movie including changes to the holoprojector images, and one scene that was cut from the first fight and added to the millenium falcon fight.

    --
    LibBT: BitTorrent for C - small - fast - clean (Now Versio
  73. Re:My predictions: (spoilers in here!) by Otto · · Score: 2

    There will be tons of boring dialog consiting of wooden actors and tons of soul-less computer generated aliens used to replicate the puppet mastery of 70s.
    The love between the princess and anakin will be completely fabricated and unrealistic. Probably using the tired forbidden love motif we have all seen before.
    Scenes with Jarjar will be minimized (obvious point) given the negative feedback from episode I.
    There will be another unbelievable car chase scene to prove that anakin is a greatest starfighter pilot ever. ho-hum.
    There will be another intense lightsaber duel with a gimmic like the dual bladed light saber seen in episode one.
    We will learn more about yoda demistifing the character making him/her/it less interesting IMHO.


    Why bother to post this when you've obviously downloaded the movie on VCD already? ;-)

    Yes, every one of these is absolutely true. Not to mention a lot of inside jokes, namely, at least 3 hands being cut off, and a "i've got a bad feeling about this" which will cause one mighty cheering from the audience. :-)

    However, you left out that there's also a goodly chunk of plot to make you go "oohhhh.. now I get it" and a couple of reversals in the plot to leave you wondering how ep3 will tie it together. I've got some ideas on how it'll play out, namely that there's going to have to be one mighty betrayal other than Anakin becoming James Earl Jones, and that all the Jedi are going to get totally blindsided by it to the extent that the vast majority of them get the quick trip to the other side...

    All in all, it's worth watching. But yeah, you get complainers no matter what you do. At least JarJar only talks three times and those are mercifully short.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  74. won't be buying it by oogoody · · Score: 1

    I love the star wars books. Except the books
    written around the movies. They suck because
    they are only meant to tie together events
    rather than be the source of the events in the
    first place. Any of the other books would make
    an interesting base for movies. Books just
    for movies apparently don't work at all. They
    are soul-less plot for plot's sake wastes of
    time.

  75. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by Arandir · · Score: 2

    Nope, I definitely recall that scene. It's not a folk tale. Or at least, if it's a folk tale, it's one that happens to be true.

    I'm not telling you about a friend of a friend whose great aunt says she saw it, I'm telling you first hand.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  76. OT:Latin Plurals by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

    continui. (plural of continuum?)

    It's my (limited) understanding of Latin that when making a word plural:

    • us -> i
    • um -> a

    Thus:

    • radius -> radii
    • hippopotamus -> hippopotami
    • cactus -> cacti

    But:

    • maximum -> maxima
    • symposium -> symposia*
    • hoodlum -> hoodla**

    So, I would expect the plural of "continuum" to be "continua".

    *Thank you, Futurama
    **Thank you, Isaac Asimov

    1. Re:OT:Latin Plurals by Murson · · Score: 1
      I have to agree with the above, but should add the obvious ommission:
      • stadium -> stadia*
      * Thank you, Tom Lehrer
      --
      "MS Windows is like the Force. It has a Dark Side, a Light... damn, there goes that analogy!"
  77. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

    The title of the Alan Dean Foster book you're refering to was "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" (at least in the states) In retrospect it's a bit disturbing, as it explores potential romance between Luke and Leia (who we didn"t know at the time were brother and sister) I'll allow that Foster (who previously had written excellent novellizations of the Star Trek animated series) was also unaware.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  78. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

    I remember that scene in the Marvel Comics adaptation, FWIW.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  79. Size Matters by ledbetter · · Score: 2

    With all the fluff intended to fill pages, it seems this book must have been meant to be read while waiting in line for the movie. When the reviewer suggests we "wait a week" for the movie, he's not kidding!

  80. General rambling by hostmaster · · Score: 1

    There's a paragraph in the book where Obi-Wan says the time Luke will spend alone with Padme is one of his trials, before he graduates to become a Jedi, and he hopes Luke realizes this.

    The explosive topic of war crimes perpetrated by people we regard as heroes, and the complexity of our response if we know them well was rather deflty handled in the book.

    The book has lots of filler, but that's what one expects from a sci-fi book. It's a quick read though, large type and skimmable. I thought the love-story between Luke and Padme was actually developed rather well in the novel. There's nothing surprising about it, but practically every love-story is hackneyed because the genre is so popular with readers and writers.

    I'd read the novelisation of episode I before seeing the movie, since I knew there'd be a large cast of characters and I wanted to have some background. The same argument doesn't hold for episode II as much.

    What I would say is that the book, and the plot make clear what we can expect in episode III. The clone army gets hijacked, there's a lot of heartache as the twins are placed on different planets and Luke is kept ignorant of them. It's clear what causes Luke to turn to the dark side as well. His mother's torture, his guilt for abandoning her, the massacre he perpetrates, and possibly his rejection by the jedi order once he marries Padme. This also gives a lot more complexity to the prophecy "the one who will bring balance to the force".

    A couple of things that the book made me think about were political:

    • The relationship between technologically advanced societies and aboriginal ones (Gungans, Tuskens).
    • The real logistics problems that would prevent the republic from surviving in the form it had (centralized, bureaucratic, non-equal representation). The similarities between the Senate in Star Wars and the US senate are striking.
    • Lucas's distaste for or wariness of large commercial entities and politicians.
    • How someone can take advantage of a poltical system that is breaking apart to consolidate power.
    • Child development, i.e. safe environments to promote absence of fear vs. the school of hard knocks.
    • The punishment of war criminals.
    • How technology validates information and can be manipulated.
    • The ethics of cloning (I think the saga was very presccient here) and what might lead us to justify it.
    • Elite religious/intellectual orders, how they operate within society, and how they handle celibacy.

    I think the book gives much more context to these views. I'm sort of interested now in what Lucas' motivation for the moral tales in the series was. What sort of response did he have to Vietnam, LBJ, Kennedy, Korea? Certainly, there are clear parallels between Luke's destruction of the Tusken village and incidents in Vietnam.

    I actually think the issue of social responsibility versus individual desires is illuminated by the book. Perhaps it's because I'm visiting Singapore, but the Naboo and the Jedi don't seem all that different. It is a relevant topic, even if we only look at how people in demanding jobs manage work/life conflictss.

    But we can't take all of this too seriously. It is a space opera after all, its meant to be melodramatic, have great fight scenes, plot twists, surprises, and all the other good stuff that makes for an engaging tale.

    There are some interesting twists that I can see within the first 3 episodes. The Star Wars universe doesn't seem as black and white as it did in 4-6.

    I don't think the book is a bad read. I wasn't expecting any surprises in the movie, we know the outline of the plot already. I do think I'll enjoy seeing the movie more than I would have otherwise.

    --
    -- Equity lord of the Trill Consortium
    1. Re:General rambling by Kredal · · Score: 1

      s/Luke/Anakin

      I thought it was a good read, and I can see why they chose Salvatore to write it. The Jedi battles had a LOT in common with Drizzt's fights, complete with dual sabres. (: I'll be envisioning Anakin with ebony skin and purple eyes during all of his lightsaber scenes.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  81. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by zaphod123 · · Score: 1

    The book by Alan Dean Foster is titled "Splinter of
    the Mind's Eye." If you can't find it at your local used bookstore, there are currently 18 copies for sale on ebay.

    --
    :q!
  82. Just saw it by Atrax · · Score: 1

    can confirm :

    Acting IS wooden
    Yoda Kicks Ass
    Acting IS wooden

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  83. R.A. Salvatore by Genjuro+Kibagami · · Score: 1

    If you think Salvatore's combat descriptions are wordy, I agree with you, but if they chose him for this task it is likely because they *wanted* the descriptions to be indepth and wordy. You couldn't have believed that they would be anything else after reading the work he did on the Dark Elf chronicles and assorted Drizzt Do'Urden stuff.

    This sounds good to me because I especially liked the Dark Elf trilogy nearly entirely due to the fact that the fight scenes were so visceral and technically perfect, even though you never get to actually see them, he writes them how they really are.

    Then again if you like star wars for.. all the sci fi stuff, rather than the pseudo kendo lightsaber shenanigans I can see how you'd be feeling a bit let down.

    To each their own.

  84. Re:Dooku/separatists *slight SPOILERS* by snkline · · Score: 1

    I don't think that AOTC is really dealing with the Clone Wars. It deals more with, the VERY beginning of the Clone Wars (which I am assuming is going to be a war between the Republic and the Sepratists)

    I REALLY liked the return of the Imperial theme in AOTC, when all the clones are marching around like stormtroppers...sent chills down my spine hearing that music again.

  85. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" is completely non-Canonical. In it, Luke kills Vader. Duh. SotME is what Alan Dean Foster would have written, had Lucas asked him to write a sequel to Star Wars. Which he didn't. But that didn't stop Foster from writing it and getting it published. Mind you, I like Foster--"With Friends Like These" is my favorite short story collection, bar none, and "...Who Needs Enemies?" is also somewhere in the top 10. But Foster should have stayed butted out of someone else's story. The error is greater because of Foster's demonstrated ability to create convincing worlds of his own--he didn't NEED to piggyback.

  86. Book vs Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having seen both the book and the movie, the book was better. While the book was a bit wordy some of the details that were left out of the movie should not have been left out.

  87. preach on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly why I'm not going to see episode II unless somebody else pays. You know it's going to be crap, I know it's going to be crap, we all know it's going to be crap. I don't pay good money for crap. Not now, not ever.

  88. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

    I'll also allow that Luke and Leia was also unaware of this fact.

    Yes, it would be disturbing but readily possible.

    --
    "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  89. Han Solo Books - Brian Daley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try getting those for a good read!

  90. 'Puter: Coincidence or Conspiracy? by Hellburner · · Score: 1

    I don't have anything concrete but you can point to the fact that Foster has written a lot of science fiction novelizations: Outland, Alien, Aliens, The Last Starfighter, The Black Hole.

    Also, I know that I read about Foster's involvement in the Star Wars novelization being a public secret in at least one or two compendia /enclyclopedia of Science Fiction author bios I have browsed through. It seems that Foster is also the semi- or uncredited author of the Star Trek: Motion Picture and Close Encounters novelizations as well.

    The most damning evidence that I have read is from Foster's work itself. In one or two places in the Star Wars novel computers are reffered to by the goofy abbrevition "'puter". I have only seen this shortening in one other place: in one of Foster's Humanx or one of his other original novels. Thin, I know, but the goofiness of it is so jarring that I can't believe it is emulation by another author who thought it "clever". Give me a few hours and I can find the books and page references.

  91. I liked the BK books better by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    Got a better feel for the story line and characters from their sparse tech-oriented pics for Episode II - not the one that has cutouts of ships and droids, but the one that shows all the characters and their cultural and tech artifacts.

    It was only $10.99 at CostCo (caveat - I own stock in that store).

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  92. Why wait a week at all when u can DL it now by thatrez · · Score: 1

    you can DL that movie right now on many of the file sharing networks, such as Direct Connect (best shot) gneutella, edonkey2000, even kazaa..... wait a week to see a movie u can see tomorrow :) hey, Im still gonna go see it at the theater and all, even though I already have it. The centropy screener is really good quality too, almost DVD like even :). Only one thing stands in your way.....

    got broadband?

  93. Re:My predictions: (spoilers in here!) by SilkBD · · Score: 1

    James Earl Jone's was only the voice. Some other really tall dude played the body... he wasn't even credited in Ep4.

    --
    00101010
  94. Ian Schoales quote... by hawkfish · · Score: 1

    "Anyone who reads a novelization of a screenplay deserves professional help, not our pity."

    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  95. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by vkevlar · · Score: 1
    (Also, there was a Star Wars book that chronicled the first duel between Vader and Skywalker published in 1978 or 1979 titled The Mind's Eye, by Alan Dean Foster. I have a copy back home, but I've never seen it in the US. That story takes place at some point between Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back; it explored some interesting backstory issues but didn't hint of Vader being Skywalker's father.)


    Splinter of the Mind's Eye, actually.

    Not bad, takes place before anyone outside of Lucas himself knew that Vader was Luke's father, so Mr. Foster probably wasn't told :)

  96. Re:About Star Wars books, revisionism, and chronol by acarey · · Score: 1

    Uh, no, Luke does _not_ kill Vader in "Splinter of the Mind's Eye". He _defeats_ Vader in a battle, thanks mainly to a force-channelling crystal he manages to find (the aforementioned "splinter"), but Vader escapes. Read the book again :)

    --
    -- "I believe the human being and the fish can coexist peacefully." - George W. Bush, 29 September 2000
  97. From someone who watched ep 2.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    There will be tons of boring dialog consiting of wooden actors and tons of soul-less computer generated aliens used to replicate the puppet mastery of 70s.

    No. The first bit with the Amidala landing and explosion (which is 10 seconds into the movie; don't worry ;)) had a brief exchange which seemed wooden. Past that the movie was so good I didn't notice any more bad dialog.

    The love between the princess and anakin will be completely fabricated and unrealistic. Probably using the tired forbidden love motif we have all seen before.

    Not exactly. It's a bit rough at first, but it becomes believable. And it's a subplot, not some sort of stupid thing shoved in your face (Anakin's pod race in #1).

    Jar-Jar's role is much less lighthearted here.

    There will be another unbelievable car chase scene to prove that anakin is a greatest starfighter pilot ever. ho-hum.

    There is a cool-looking scene where there is a car chase. It's a few minutes -- not too long, not too short. And it's not bad.

    There will be another intense lightsaber duel with a gimmic like the dual bladed light saber seen in episode one.

    Actually, no. While Lucas does do the "this is here in the movie because I can do this" thing like he did in 1 (making a pod race, jar jar, battle scene, and sabre scene being the 4 corner stones of a 1hr plot), it's not too gimmicky. He's learning to not stretch it. It's not perfect, but it's not grating.

    We will learn more about yoda demistifing the character making him/her/it less interesting IMHO.

    Nope. Yoda's still Yoda. The digital version of him looks fine. Fluid like Jar-Jar. I'm not going to spoil anything about it.

    Will leave most hardcore fans secretly disappointed but unphased since they will see episode 3.

    If a hardcore fan is disapointed, I'll be surprised. I'm not a Star Wars fan, but I know what I don't hate. And I didn't hate ep 2 -- I enjoyed it.

    If you're so set on forming an opinion before it's opened in theatres, go get the VCD. Or come to my house and you can watch it on my setup (I'll even lend you the VCDs if you want).

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  98. Re:My predictions: (spoilers in here!) by simm_s · · Score: 2

    Actually I have not watched the movie yet. The reviews spoil everything. ;>