Slashdot Mirror


FF XI Goes Live in Japan

Castolari writes "Gameforms reports about the Japanese launch of FF XI, Square's online venture with the series. Apparently, there's some serious technical problems with the server load as well." They also have some Screenshots. I'm still hoping that someone will get the MMORPG right in the not so distant future.

187 comments

  1. Question... by Ixe · · Score: 1

    It runs on linux right?
    well I wish, but I may get it anyway... here's hopin.

    --
    Sigs pose an operational security risk and help the baddies aggregate data. I guess commenting does too, oops.
    1. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It runs on linux right?

      How many linux people want a linux enabled MMORPG? What's the market like in this area?

      I'm the lead programmer and designer for a not-quite-commercial but closed source cross platform mmorpg, but I'm not sure of the market. Anyone care to comment? (but don't ask about my project... I'm not free to comment)

    2. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's closed source, you're bound to have people hacking the code and cheating.
      If it's in Linux and closed, everyone will complain. You can't win with Linux nuts. ;)

    3. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok the previous poster was a nut. To answer your question, Linux has had closed source games on the market and some have done pretty good. (Quake III, The Sims and Myth come to mind) Overall the Linux game market is somewhat mixed. Linux is usualy very popular as a server (Conterstrike) because of its stability. The real power of developing for Linux is better code through cross platform development and the fact that PS2 development is hosted under a linux enviornment. Cross platform code is usualy more robust because bugs that show up on one platform may hide in the shadows on another. Also using different tool chains can help in detecting problems early in the development cycle.

    4. Re:Question... by Ixe · · Score: 1

      True, it's not an easy to please crowd...
      C'mon I mean we demand stability and security and all that and we also demand that it's free to copy/hack/distribute....
      But at the same time, I notice that lots of linux users dual-boot linux and windows (yes I'm even guilty of this sometimes) and they still buy lots of the latest games for windows...
      This is the biggest/classic prob w/ linux users and games. Developers don't care because the linux users still buy the windows games because they're "better" (though they'd like them for linux) and they won't make them for linux because linux isn't mainstream enough yet (*WAHHHH*) for a lot of people.
      I wish I could guarantee a market for you, but I really can't. If some games came out that ran on linux natively I'd probably buy them if I could afford it just to support the cause and prove that we penguins aren't just cheap geeks...(I'm very heavily on the linux side of the software "war" and I'm sure many other /.ers are as well)

      I think I have to say if the game was any good and ran on linux, I'd go for it. (assuming your prices aren't like licensing MS Exchange or something ;) )

      --
      Sigs pose an operational security risk and help the baddies aggregate data. I guess commenting does too, oops.
    5. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non existant, linux desktop users are very very few and those few just refuses to pay for anything.

    6. Re:Question... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      What happened to the popular refrain "If it's open, we'll find the holes and we'll fix it"?

  2. world forge by filth+grinder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out the World Forge project. It's an open source attempt at creating a customizable MMORPG. They need help too with a bunch of stuff, but what they have so far looks really neat. Good stuff.

  3. Technical problems, eh? by Numair · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like Square isn't the only one having serious problems with their servers ...

    1. Re:Technical problems, eh? by ethereal · · Score: 1

      I think Gameforms just went non-live :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  4. wow by tps12 · · Score: 2

    I think I speak for the entire population of the Universe when I say: "holy cow."

    This game looks good.

    The one to beat for this Christmas season, that's for sure. (You listening, MS?)

    We're rapidly approaching the point where games will be indistinguishable from real life.

    Actually, maybe that already happened.

    Something to consider.

    Stay safe out there, everyone.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:wow by Dryth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the problem can be traced back to the statement "This game looks good."

      Admittedly I haven't been giving FFXI the attention it deserves (in lack of Sakaguchi), but taking into consideration the limited power of the PS2, and the graphic compromises in even the most advanced PC MMORPGs, I find myself wondering just how many characters we can expect to see on-screen? How many enemies? How many unique environment elements and NPCs?

      Part of the appeal of MMORPGs is the ability to have insane numbers of players all interacting simultaneously.

      The question I pose to those that've followed the progress of FFXI is whether it's truly an MMORPG, or simply an online RPG of the same sort as Phantasy Star Online, where clear limits are placed on the number of active characters?

      As for MS, if I were them, I'd be perfectly happy with Morrowind for the XBox. It's a beautiful, engrossing game for the PC. But then, it doesn't have the words "Final" and "Fantasy" anywhere in its name, so it's unlikely that the bulk of console RPG gamers'll give it any notice.

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, MS is listening.

      The team at Turbine who MS publishes is offering Asheron's Call 2 late this year (thier telling us it'll be ready for christmas so far) It looks like it will be an awesome game.

      AC1 despite using the crappy zone as it's login system is IMO the best of the current MMORPGs that balanced content & action, and had the only PVP action worth playing.

      That was Turbine's very first offering, they look like they learned alot from thier mistakes & are making thier second offering absolutley amazing.

      http://zone.msn.com/inviso1/

  5. Always willing to help... by Your_Mom · · Score: 1

    Apparently, there's some serious technical problems with the server load as well.

    And nothing helps server load problems like a good ol' slashdottin'!!!

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
  6. play testing? by ryepup · · Score: 1

    So, are they using japan for testing before they release it to the US and Europe? I don't know the sizes of the different markets, but I'm under the impression that those kooky asians play videogames constantly over there, and would be a great group to break in a new technology for other markets that are less tolerant to bugs. Kinda a nationwide beta test, maybe.

    1. Re:play testing? by Nadir · · Score: 1

      Sony AND Square are both Japanese companies. That's why it's available over there before it is over here.

      --
      --
      The world is divided in two categories:
      those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
    2. Re:play testing? by Confound · · Score: 1

      The japanese play video games constantly, but they're totally computer illiterate. My students think that my winamp window is a game, and that my word processor is a hacking tool.

      I don't know how the FFXI demo will pan out over here, but i'm sure that half the technical problems that will be reported are from idiotic users.

      --
      !-- wit --!
  7. Shaky start on a risky road... by supercytro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After their unsuccessful movie venture, Square is walking a dangerous line especially as initial reports are saying that takeup has been relatively poor yet the technical infrastructure is unable to handle even this. Hence, large amounts of dissatisfaction even before the usual problems with cheating and administration...

    1. Re:Shaky start on a risky road... by newbiescum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A few other sites such as Magic Box are reporting pretty good sales. While expectations are probably different with console gamers versus PC gamers, I haven't seen a PC MMORPG do any better yet. Also, building an initial fanbase is always rocky but if Square is able to stick it out for the long term and the game is good enough that word spreads, they may have the first Everquest on consoles.

    2. Re:Shaky start on a risky road... by iapetus · · Score: 2

      I don't know what 'initial reports' you're reading, but most reports from gaming sites and from people in Japan are saying that the game (and the hardware that goes with it) is sold out pretty much everywhere. Exactly what the initial print run was I have no idea, but that can't be a bad result by anyone's standards...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    3. Re:Shaky start on a risky road... by iapetus · · Score: 2

      Just to add to this, the latest daily charts from Japan show FFXI at number one, overcoming even the mighty sales monster that is World Soccer Winning Eleven 6...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    4. Re:Shaky start on a risky road... by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      I don't know if the movie venture they mean is FF: Spirits Within, but I thought that was a pretty good film - good enough to make me want to go out and buy a copy on DVD.

    5. Re:Shaky start on a risky road... by Confound · · Score: 1

      From my experience, living in Japan, the Japanese will buy anything, anywhere, anytime. You show them pretty pictures, they BUY. Even a cruddy game sells like hotcakes over here. As long as its from Square or has panty shots, it will be off the shelf in 15 minutes.

      This is a culture where people act on 'feelings', not logic or reason. there is also very little 'saving' here. the protestant ethic just isn't a native phenomenon in this culture. thus if it has a good commercial, it will survive its moment in the sun, sell incredibly, then pop up in the used stores.

      in all honesty, i'm quite certain that there will be loads of problems. if i'm wrong, feel free to yell at me. the anime otaku do it all the time.

      "It can't be that way! I saw it in Evangelion!"

      --
      !-- wit --!
  8. If you're looking for a MMOG that gets it right... by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you're looking for a MMOG that gets it right, look at Shadowbane. (http://shadowbane.ubisoft.com/) Your typical MMOG is like Disney World, you go there, have fun, but have no impact on the place besides giving them money, and all the other people just get in the way. If there's a plot, it turns out the same whether you're there or not. In Shadowbane, you make the plot while building your kingdom Machiavelli-style, then coming after anyone you don't like with ballistas and trebuchets. That sure beats camping monsters, whether or not the monsters come from some big franchise like Star Wars or Final Fantasy.

    --
    For great justice.
  9. Decisions, decisions by Carnivore24 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now that the XBOX is 199.99 and upcoming release of FFXI this fall in the US(hopefully) I dont know what to do. Should I buy an XBOX and stock up on a few games or save money up for the PS2 ethernet adapter and harddrive for FFXI?

  10. Ya know... by Arminius · · Score: 1

    Sometimes it seems that the better looking these games are graphically the worse their gameplay is.

    Sometimes eyecandy isnt all it's cracked up to be.

    --

    ------
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  11. More info by jwinter1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Check out drac.org for more info (here's their FAQ)

    Some of the highlights:
    FFXI requires the USB modem and the PS2 harddrive
    and CANNOT be played offline.

    --
    Anything you can do, I can do meta.
  12. yen conversion by adamnap · · Score: 1

    According to the bank of canada 1280 yen is about 9.99$ US a month. Not too bad, especially at a flat rate.

    1. Re:yen conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps if the game works, the servers do their job, and it's fun, i might agree with you.

  13. Server load.. by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Apparently it's not just the FFXI servers that can't handle the load.. anything related to FFXI in any way will buckle because there are zillions of SquareSoft fans hitting "Reload" 18 times per second, a nervous twitch left over from pulling off huge GF boosts in FF8.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Server load.. by IHavePowers · · Score: 1

      Your theory is sound, don't forget about them getting in a little "action" when the female characters are on screen.

    2. Re:Server load.. by Professor+J+Frink · · Score: 2

      Damn right. Princess Garnet in FF IX has the cutest arse I've ever seen!

      --
      "Don't get mad, get a monkey!"
  14. hey you bastards! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    I was trying to read that site, and then it got slashdotted!

    Dammit peoples, what the hell is wrong with you?!

    ;-)

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:hey you bastards! by t0qer · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Yet another reason for slash to implement some sort of cache ala google.

    2. Re:hey you bastards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another reason for slash to implement some sort of cache ala google.

      This is in the FAQ and has been brought up a million times, but I'm writing to ask what you mean by "yet another reason." A site getting slashdotted is the only reason for doing it and so far the reasons for not doing it outweigh that one reason.

      We just need a way to make google cache a site on demand so that Slashdot can prepare for this. Duplicating the effort is not the answer.

  15. Not my fault! by misfit13b · · Score: 1

    Wow, a server crash that /. didn't cause.

  16. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by Te1waz · · Score: 4, Funny

    You are not kidding.

    I had to take the bus to work for a month after playing GTA3...

    A. I'd lost the habit of driving on the left side of the road (I live in U.K/Ireland).
    B. I had the temptation to mount the pavement to get past slow moving traffic.
    C. I could not longer drive 1st person, I'd have to sit on the roof and control the car via a complicated set of cables through the sunroof.

    I'm hoping the next version of GTA will have some neato network gaming ability. Imagine being able to hook up with an online cartel, or the thrill of starting a riot with other players or foiling their missions with a well-aimed grenade...

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
  17. Dark Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dark Age of camelot rocks as a serious online game. It has not crashed on me nor has serious lag like everquest did. I highly recommend it. especially since EQ developers signed a big old contract with microshaft.

    "Jisms are best served, when people are lest expecting it" -overheard in IRC #E channel, just tell them mej sent ya....

  18. Your life or my life ? by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I don't know about you but for some strange reason playing football (soccer), basketball etc with my mates is for some reason alot more fun than looking at a computer game.

    Life isn't watching a TV set, and as good as graphics get, no game will ever equal that feeling as you blast in a shot from 20 yards, or nail a 3 pointer over your work mates.

    Games are fun, but if you can't tell the difference between a game and your life... then you need help.

    And no game ever will beat the smile you get from your kid first thing in the morning.

    Cool game, I might get it, but please... like real life ?

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Your life or my life ? by wheany · · Score: 1

      no game will ever equal that feeling as you blast in a shot from 20 yards, or nail a 3 pointer over your work mates.

      Well maybe your friends don't suck as much as mine. Oh, I forgot, we don't do anything that involves any excercise..

    2. Re:Your life or my life ? by jgerman · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Yeah, keep the elitism to yourself please. You may not think it's elitism but it is. You've basically just said "the lifestyle I choose is better than the lifestyle you choose". Which is not only arrogant, but completely meanigless. There is no more inherent quality in say, playing a sports video game, as opposed to actually playing the sport. It's all part of the personality of the person in question.
      Your comment isn't insightful, it's worthless. Who are you to determine what life is, and how someone should live it. I'm sure for people who don't want children (and like games), a game is infinitely better than a smile from a kid.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    3. Re:Your life or my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us can't run farther than from the office to the parking lot without getting winded. Why would we intentionally inflict such pain on ourselves by playing an active sport like that? My heart would probably burst. I'll take sitting on my fat ass any day and playing video games over going out and having a stroke.

    4. Re:Your life or my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Personally, I'd rather play through a world that people have poured their energy into over years than get all excited about kicking a plastic ball around. I'm not against exercise, or sports that actually have some sort of intrinsic enjoyment, but hockey, soccer, basketball/whatever just don't hold any appeal to me. Sports and Final Fantasy have almost nothing in common anyway... I think by "life-like" the original poster meant that the games were becoming more complicated and more pretty.

    5. Re:Your life or my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant to mention skiing as an example of a sport that actually has a point. Swimming/hiking/whatever's okay too.

    6. Re:Your life or my life ? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Life isn't watching a TV set, and as good as graphics get, no game will ever equal that feeling as you blast in a shot from 20 yards, or nail a 3 pointer over your work mates.

      I respect your opinion, MosesJones, but I disagree with the spirit of your statement. I'm a 26 year old engineer-- I'm not in the best of shape, but I work out three times a week. There's no way I can keep up with a true athlete, a few of which are my [co-workers|work mates]. "Blasting shots", "nailing 3 pointers", wouldn't mean much to me anyway. But when I can challenge my boss's boss to a game of Rush 2049 in Dave and Busters, and actually compete, that means a great deal to me. Electronics in this case even the field. He may be 39, but he runs for an hour every day and helps his 16 year old son practice football (American). With my current goals, I couldn't hope to compete athletically. But, I can keep up in a game, and we can have experiences that he'll talk about for months. What does it mean when your boss's boss happily talks about how you almost ran him off the road in a game 4 months after the fact? To me, that means we used the false reality to actually share a personal experience that ends up benefitting our professional relationship in the end.

      And no game ever will beat the smile you get from your kid first thing in the morning.

      I can't disagree with you there. Some day, God willing, I hope to be able to agree with you.
    7. Re:Your life or my life ? by zsmooth · · Score: 2

      Funny thing is, it's your lifestyle that will bring on the stroke eventually... Get out and run around a bit, get your heart so it's more than a pile of mush and you'll lessen the chances of having a stroke.

    8. Re:Your life or my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about putting the damned game over there child? Or were you looking for a reason to show everyone how much better you think you are then everyone else?

      Shouldn't this be modded redundant?

    9. Re:Your life or my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get outside much, do you? You have fun eating your potato chips on the couch you haven't moved from in two days playing your games, and I'm gonna go outside and get some exercise. Call it what you like, I'm still going to be alive for a decade after your greasy, unbathed self is long gone.

    10. Re:Your life or my life ? by jslag · · Score: 2
      You may not think it's elitism but it is. You've basically just said "the lifestyle I choose is better than the lifestyle you choose". Which is not only arrogant, but completely meanigless. There is no more inherent quality in say, playing a sports video game, as opposed to actually playing the sport. It's all part of the personality of the person in question.

      Elitest, maybe - but meaningless? I think not. Thousands of years of evolution have led our bodies to a configuration that depends on regular movement and activity. For those of us that are stuck in a chair for working hours, using our free time to sit on our asses for the hours at a stretch associated with online gaming isn't the greatest idea. Out of shape and suffering from repetitive stress injuries is no way to go through life.

    11. Re:Your life or my life ? by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Wow, The above post actually makes a good point and was modded down as flamebait, while that parent is +5 insightfull? I've only got 6 Karma, but it's worth burning just to say that this is the worst use of Karma I've seen yet here at Slash!

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    12. Re:Your life or my life ? by jgerman · · Score: 2

      And society changes. There is still nothing iherently good or bad in activity vs. inactivity.
      We are much less active than we were 100 years ago, is this bad, of course not, is our quality of life better, who knows, in general I'd say yes, but that's just an opinion. Out of shape is a term laced with opinion, it means nothing. Out of shape for what?

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    13. Re:Your life or my life ? by X_Caffeine · · Score: 1

      Your comment reminded me of one of my best customers at Software Etc. (don't look at me like that, it was a LONG time ago). Paraplegic, whole left side of his body paralyzed, for life I think. Big time sports gamer, nothing he liked better than picking up the latest basketball titles for the Sega Genesis. I'd really like to see you look him in the eye, talk about how great your football match was, and how you should be able to tell the difference between a game and your life.

      --
      // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    14. Re:Your life or my life ? by LtOcelot · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you but for some strange reason playing football (soccer), basketball etc with my mates is for some reason alot more fun than looking at a computer game.
      I share that preference. However, those are also games, and there's no moral highground to be found in preferring them. The value of a game is determined by the enjoyment it provides, and if someone enjoys playing computer games more than playing active sports, it would be senseless for him to set the latter above the former.
      Life isn't watching a TV set, and as good as graphics get, no game will ever equal that feeling as you blast in a shot from 20 yards, or nail a 3 pointer over your work mates.
      Since I don't like basketball, and do like some computer games, I naturally disagree with respect to my own experience. I enjoy some playing some other sports more than I enjoy playing computer games, but for me the groups are complementary, not mutually exclusive. There are some things that can't be done in a computer game, but there are also some things that can't be done outside of one.
      Games are fun, but if you can't tell the difference between a game and your life... then you need help.
      Games are a part of life. Granted, there are different kinds of games, and it's important not to give any of them more significance than it deserves. That applies as much to a real-life game like "keeping up with the Joneses" as it does to the virtual equivalent.
    15. Re:Your life or my life ? by Rupert · · Score: 2

      I'm sure for people who don't want children (and like games), a game is infinitely better than a smile from a kid.

      That attitude should get weeded out of the gene pool really fast.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    16. Re:Your life or my life ? by Prio · · Score: 1

      I've only got 6 Karma, but it's worth burning just to say that this is the worst use of Karma I've seen yet here at Slash!

      And who are you to say what is or is not a good use of Karma? You little elitist you.
      *ribjabs*

    17. Re:Your life or my life ? by Tewley · · Score: 1

      For those of us that are stuck in a chair for working hours, using our free time to sit on our asses for the hours at a stretch associated with online gaming isn't the greatest idea.

      Well said. And it needs to be said.

      I love games. And I have a tech job. I suspect a significant portion of Slashdot readership is in the same boat. But I have to remind myself, frequently, that it's a nice day outside, get out of the house. Staring at a PC all day and all night can really detatch you from the best things about being a human being.

      Some freakishly fanatic first-person shooter and MMORPG players need to be clubbed on the head with their own GeForce cards -- or taken on a camping trip.

      But, of course, freedom guarantees you can rot away for as long as you want. I'm just saying --the best framerate and texture mapping is available in the real fscking world.

    18. Re:Your life or my life ? by Prio · · Score: 1

      And if that customer of yours woke up one day and discovered that he had been healed of his paralysis somehow or other, that now, miraculously, he could get up and walk and run and do this and that and the other thing, how much time do you think he'd spend playing video games afterwards?

      I'm certainly not saying that he would be "better off dead" or something sickening like that - but I find the idea that he wouldn't be better off with the full use of his body to be almost as scary.

    19. Re:Your life or my life ? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      For those of us that are stuck in a chair for working hours, using our free time to sit on our asses for the hours at a stretch associated with online gaming isn't the greatest idea. Out of shape and suffering from repetitive stress injuries is no way to go through life.

      And what about a good frind of mine who offloads odd cargos in a port, hauling heavy boxes and crates onto a mover where they pass through customs? He works lifting heavy objects eight hours a day (and has the physical attributes that you would expect). When he gets home, he plays Ultima Online for several hours.

      Not everybody is "stuck in a chair" and then goes home and plays these games. I also know a beat cop who goes home and plays flight sims for hours. (I do work in a chair, but then, I go running for an hour every morning and don't play video games... I keep meaning to, but other things interest me more).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    20. Re:Your life or my life ? by Biggyto · · Score: 1

      Having "a life" is doing what brings joy to you. While you may have partied and played sports this past week, I enjoyed watching Clerks and Mallrats last night and played some UT. This may not of been very productive in your mind but I had a god time.

  19. Japan and bugs.... by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Informative


    Umm lets see so Japan tolerates bugs does it.

    Japan has Sony, Nintendo, Panasonic etc etc the consumer gods of planet earth. Why do we like them ? Because they work EVERYTIME.

    The US has Microsoft, CDMA, Oracle and the gods of bloatware.

    They are testing in Japan because ITS A JAPANESE GAME!

    Don't be lulled into a feeling that they can't build things better in Japan.... imagine Honda v Harley Davidson in a race.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Japan and bugs.... by t0qer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't be lulled into a feeling that they can't build things better in Japan.... imagine Honda v Harley Davidson in a race.

      Actually it depends on what kind of bike/race you're talking about. For pure 0 to 60 speed, no Harley can beat a rice rocket, but once a Harley get's up to speed, it can go indefinetly.

    2. Re:Japan and bugs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't be lulled into a feeling that they can't build things better in Japan.... imagine Honda v Harley Davidson in a race."

      Funny that, Honda recently introduced a road bike that features... *gasp!* a V-Twin like engine.

      Furthermore, a few years ago, it was common to find Harley badging on many of the Japanese bikes - that's right, people were putting H-D badging on their Hondas overseas, because it's a status symbol.

      However, I get the feeling that you were thinking more along the lines of "super bikes", and in that case, compare a Honda bike to one made by, say, Ducatti. Even Harley's new V Rod, while it has roots in motorcycle racing technology, is still considered a touring bike.

    3. Re:Japan and bugs.... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Japan has Sony, Nintendo, Panasonic etc etc the consumer gods of planet earth. Why do we like them ? Because they work EVERYTIME.

      Never owned a Sony, eh?

      Don't be lulled into a feeling that they can't build things better in Japan.... imagine Honda v Harley Davidson in a race.

      Image Honda vs. Harley Davidson in a game of chicken...

    4. Re:Japan and bugs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loved all the problems with the cartridge loader on the 8-bit NES, too.

    5. Re:Japan and bugs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My NES cartridges have gotten more blowjobs than I have. :-(

    6. Re:Japan and bugs.... by jgerman · · Score: 2

      imagine Honda v Harley Davidson in a race.imagine Honda v Harley Davidson in a race.


      Don't need to, I've seen it. Well a Buell which is owned by HD. There wasn't a Japanese bike there that could beat the Buell's. In fact the best Japanese bike riders best time's weren't hitting the average Buell time. You want to talk top speed, then we'll talk Japanese bikes, you want to talk handling, we'll talk Buell. It's funny everytime I go to BattleTrax I see frustrated Japanese bike riders who realize that for all their elitism, Buell's handle better. It all depends on application. Want to run a superbike track, ok fine the Jap bikes are better. Want to run through the twisties, can't beat a Buell.


      I haven't even touched the quality of ride aspect of it, faster does not equal better.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    7. Re:Japan and bugs.... by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Informative

      How odd then that they don't even appear in the standings for the Motorbike World Endurance Championship
      In fact *every* entry in the 2001 series was a Japanese bike.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    8. Re:Japan and bugs.... by KH · · Score: 1

      I thought there was a time in BOTT or Superbike racing when HDs ruled. Or are they still good? Perhaps Ducati did some good job, too.

    9. Re:Japan and bugs.... by KH · · Score: 1

      Want to run a superbike track, ok fine the Jap bikes are better.

      I doubt it. Italians seem to be doing a slightly better job.
    10. Re:Japan and bugs.... by jgerman · · Score: 2

      I should apologize for that, I got /. syndrome and went too far and ignored other superbike contenders. My point however still stands, different bikes for different applications. Buell's are (as of yet) untouchable for handling (excluding some dual sports which do come close, but they certainly don't have top speed.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    11. Re:Japan and bugs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you up, but I spent all my mod points yesterday :(

    12. Re:Japan and bugs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "rice rocket"?

      ...sigh...I never like making such comments, but someone might think that its a cute little phrase to use...god, what other ideas are you guys carrying in your heads?

  20. MMORPG Right? by Rayonic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > I'm still hoping that someone will get the MMORPG right in the not so distant future.

    Are you talking about this MMORPG, or MMORPGs in general? IIRC, FFXI isn't trying anything drastically new in the Massively Online RPG arena (besides being on a console. Whoop.)

  21. Watch the past & Are Consoles Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    UO, EQ, AO, AC all had problem starting. Only Camelot had a decent start up and that's only because they've done it all before. Funcom even lost a large chunk of their workforce due to the poor launch and its taken about 6 months to get back on track.
    MMPORGs are nothing to be taken lightly and they usually take a minimum of about 2-3 years of development. I honestly don't feel Square is up to the task, a RPG and MMPORG are completely differnet genres and require a completely different approach to games. With thousands of people playing and paying everday your customer service and community connections becomes a large factor, costs, hardware, in game and out of game support, patching, exploiting, bugs and a hundred other things become a daily task that is daunting to say the least.

    The other large thing to look at is the console vs. pc. PC users are used to patching things, downloading, dealing with other people, dealing with connectivity issues and with 10 years and counting of online gaming things still work well but not great. Its a slow process and one I don't think the console user is ready for. Your average PC gamer understands ping and packet loss a little bit more and your average MMPORG user knows not to expect to log onto a new server let alone a new game the first week it goes live.

    Going from a static game to a MMPORG is like a car making deciding to make planes all of a sudden. Its kind of the same, but not at all.

    I congratulate Square in trying to do something new to the console but I think they are going to be nothing more then a guninea pig :)

  22. Good thing they're getting slashdoted too! by iamwoodyjones · · Score: 0

    Ah good. I enjoy it when Slashdoters help their servers out =P

  23. What about other countries? by ChocoboKnight · · Score: 1
    I know the big markets are Asia, US and Europe. But there are thousands of fans here in Mexico and in the rest of Latin America.

    Does anyone know of plans for releasing the needed accesories in Mexico?. The local Sony shop does not have a clue about when and if they will sell the PS2 harddrive and modem.

    1. Re:What about other countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youre a lucky son a of a bitch. In Brazil we dont even have a local Sony shop for SCEA products. All PS1 and PS2 are imported and most of them come from black market.

  24. MMORPG are always buggy... live with that... by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Due to it's huge complexity... MMORPG are bound to be launched with bugs...

    Always had and it will be a long time til one is launched without bugs (if ever).

    Cheers...

    P.S.- mayhappen i will play another MMORPG (played UO, EQ, AO and DAoC)... but they all lack something... when i find what it is...

  25. The online console wars by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Round 1 of the console wars is over, with Sony far in 1st place, and Nintendo and the Xbox somewhere in second. (Most of my figures say Nintendo is in the 2nd place slot, but its so close nobody can tell.)

    Round 2 has now begun - and it's over before it's even started. Look at the competition:

    Sony - spend $150 on a 40 Gigabyte hard drive with ethernet and modem ports. Use with any ISP you with. Developers provide the servers.

    The games: Final Fantasy XI, Everquest, and Star Wars: Galaxies

    Nintendo - spend $35 on either an ethernet adapter, or a modem. Use with any ISP you want. Developers provide the servers.

    The Games: Phantasy Star Online 1 and 2.

    Xbox - spend $0 dollars - but you have to sign up for a fee (price unknown, assumed to be $5-$10 a month). Servers maintained by Microsoft (a point that kept that kept EA out of the Xbox online system.

    The Games: Um....

    This is why I sold my Xbox yesterday. (And have exactly enough in store credit that I could get a new one in case the Xbox comes out with something pretty damn cool.)

    But so far, Sony is far and away doing the best job with online gaming, and with their partnership with AOL, and the Linux system on the PS2, I think the fears Microsoft had (as detailed in the first part of the book Opening the Xbox, where the Xbox was mainly a reaction to the fear that the PS2 would become a hoome computer), are all coming true.

    1. Re:The online console wars by Mika_Lindman · · Score: 1

      "Xbox - spend $0 dollars - but you have to sign up for a fee (price unknown, assumed to be $5-$10 a month). Servers maintained by Microsoft (a point that kept that kept EA out of the Xbox online system [slashdot.org].

      The Games: Um...."

      Halo ?

    2. Re:The online console wars by newbiescum · · Score: 1
      Like the AC said, you have to be really optimistic if you think that the console online wars are over. PS2 online games will also probably have fees (FFXI does). $150 for addons is quite a bit of money considering that the PS2 now only costs $200. I think the pricing will actually drop significantly to $100 or less for both eventually, but that's still a big chunk of change.

      X-Box has Unreal Championship and an online version of Halo probably as well as Asheron's Call. I don't recall if SW: Galaxies will be going to PS2, and a quick lookover the FAQ says its undecided.

      As a PS2 owner, I think Sony is the only one that has really announced concrete plans, and theirs will launch first in the US unless MS pulls something weird at E3. However, as far as who is in the better position, that's definitely undecided.

    3. Re:The online console wars by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

      Console add-ons have never worked, ever. $150 for an add-on when an entire XBox is $199. XBox has a lot of online games coming. Just because EA doesn't want to play doesn't mean others won't. There are already one or two other NFL games, Midtown Madness, Unreal, and a few more I read about on IGN the other day. This Christmas should be the real beginning for online console games.

    4. Re:The online console wars by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      Halo was fine on the Xbox - but since I still believe MS's promise to allow Halo to come to the PC/Mac (especially the Mac), I don't see the need to spend another $300 just for one game.

      Unreal Championship - I'll wait for Unreal Tournament 2003 and, again, won't have to spend $300 on the Xbox.

      I'm not dissin' the big, green X - but until I see a "must have" game, I don't see the need to own one. (Now, if they brought Sakura Taisen 1-4 for the Xbox to North America, and had Rachel Lillis as a voice actor, then we'd talk.)

    5. Re:The online console wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, are you a crappy nostradamus.

      Sony is the "winner" by requiring a $150 investment to play a game online? Come again? You do know you can buy another entire console for $200 now, right? A lot of people have a hard time coughing up $150 on console they already own just so they can play online games. Sega Saturn's netlink failed for this reason, as did the 64DD. Historcally, sales of any required add on have been very low, and a $150 one is almost a guaranteed disaster.

      The Dreamcast offered this "Developers provide the servers" model that you so highly tout. Most likely you haven't used it, but it sucked. Developers who didn't know how to configure servers, cumbersome and proprietary server browsers (reinventing the wheel from each developing house), lobby interfaces that make Gamespy look advanced. It was crap, it was unstable, and it was unusable. Out of the excellent of sales of NFL2K1, you could find about 500-1000 people online at any given time.

      Microsoft has a $0 up front cost, and this is a big deal. The people who want to play online games simply jack in their CAT 5, and they're up and running. Sign up for an account? Maybe it's me, but for a homogenous environment and stable servers, $5-10/month is a fair price to pay. I think game makers should focus on making games, not making proprietary servers and technology suited only to their application, as this is a waste of everyone's time. If you don't like it, vote with your money.

      In this case, having an actual vision and making it happen is a good thing. Once the online market establishes itself in consoles, the strategy that Nintendo/Sony are approaching may work, but until then I do not see it happening.

    6. Re:The online console wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've read, Shenmue II and its sequels are XBOX exclusives. Too bad they're going with English narration...

    7. Re:The online console wars by Quikah · · Score: 2

      Memory cards sell. Extra controllers sell. Are those not add-ons? I am not saying that the PS2 ethernet/HD will sell, but saying add-ons don't sell is silly.

      --
      Q.
    8. Re:The online console wars by 56ker · · Score: 2

      There are still surprises in the console market though. When everyone thought Sony would lower the price of the PS2 in reply to the X-Box lowered price they lowered the price of the PSOne. A lot of people seem to be sitting on the fence until prices don't go any lower before deciding which platform to buy.

    9. Re:The online console wars by pjkacmar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "But so far, Sony is far and away doing the best job with online gaming, and with their partnership with AOL, and the Linux system on the PS2"

      Excuse me, but what do AOL and the Linux system have to do with online gaming? Nothing! the PS2 Linux is just for people wanting to play around with Linux. Also, I believe it's been noted that if you have Linux loaded on the hard drive, then you can't use the hard drive for normal game usage. Hardly great for online gaming.

      Also, you forgot to mention that there is a monthly fee to play Final Fantasy XI. If every game is going to have a fee to be played online, I'd rather just pay one flat fee and be able to play all my games online.

      I think the company that by far and away is doing the best online gaming is Sega. They have their experience from the Dreamcast to bring with them. They've already had their Sega Sports titles and Phantasy Star Online going online. They should be able to fairly quickly deliver a decent number of online games.

      E3 should give us some indications of what companies want to do online, but we really won't have a good feel of what's going to happen until late summer or fall.

    10. Re:The online console wars by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

      They will have to re-release HALO for the X-Box the current version doesn't work on the real internet afaik.

      That will piss some people off I know.

    11. Re:The online console wars by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      I imported it from Europe - English included :).

    12. Re:The online console wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EA sucks. Who needs em. What? No multiplayer versions of their crapy Bond games or Simpsons Crazy Taxi for my XBox? How terrible.

  26. In-Game Shots, PS2's Age by nherc · · Score: 1
    The in-game shots are nice... but, you can really see the PS2 starting to show it's age and limitations.

    Ouch, and you NEED to by a modem AND a hard drive add-on just to play this. The XBOX, whose online service is kicking off really soon, at $199 with this stuff built in (well the hard drive and ethernet) is looking like the best deal right now.

    Plus, it's been hacked. *cough* running unsigned code *cough*

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
  27. Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is a FFXI? A special effects machine? And what the hell is square, besides a 2-dimensional figure with the length and width equal?

  28. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by radish · · Score: 2

    Actually after a heavy weekend of it, B kinda came true. That and getting VERY angry when someone cut me up. At that point I decided not to play so much ;)

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  29. FFX by wheany · · Score: 1

    Okay, so when do we Europeans get Final fantasy X? (Yeah, I know at the end of May)

    Final fantasy IV and V were just released (for PSX) and FFVI not long ago. Chrono cross was never released and now we are one game behind even with current Final fantasies.

    Good work Square! Fucking two thumbs up!

    1. Re:FFX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pfft... whiner.

    2. Re:FFX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So get your ass over to a REAL country.

    3. Re:FFX by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Better than that - the PAL Version is simply fscked up

      It's been almost a year since the Japanese release and they were too incompetent to increase the vertical resolution from 480 (NTSC) to 576 (PAL) therefore all characters look as if their character class was sumo wrestler

      And -who would have guessed it- there will be no 60Hz mode.

      As it seems Square doesn't give a shit about Europe. Ok, perhaps they can't sell as many games here as in Japan or in the US but I certainly don't have to like that attitude and there are enough other excellent RPGs for PS2

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  30. MMORPG by Flower · · Score: 1
    I'm still hoping that someone will get the MMORPG right in the not so distant future.

    They do. It's called a MUSH. (I'm only slightly kidding here.)

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  31. Fingers crossed by torinth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still hoping that someone will get the MMORPG right in the not so distant future.

    Cross your fingers. If Neverwinter Nights turns out to be any good, it has the potential to be a peer-to-peer MMORPG. You can supposedly interconnect realms hosted on various machines through 'portals'. Granted, you may not be able to get 1000 users in one specific realm if some schmuck is running it in his basement on an overclocked 486, but with sufficient linking of portals, you can really pretend it's a huge single realm.

    -Andrew

    1. Re:Fingers crossed by antistuff · · Score: 1

      I am looking forward to that game so much it is starting to hurt.

  32. slashdot effect by shawnmelliott · · Score: 3, Informative

    The site is down but for those who want to see some screens you can go

    here

    After looking at the level of detail on this and thinking this is supposed to be multiplayer I don't doubt they have "technical" issues

    1. Re:slashdot effect by malakai · · Score: 1

      Graphics are client side, that wouldn't be boging down the servers. The chocobo may have 10k polygons, but to the server, it's nothing more than an object with an ID and some unique properties.

  33. Console MMORPGs by delphin42 · · Score: 1

    I would think they would open up the market for MMORPGs quite a bit. It seems likely that more younger gamers would be likely to play on the console rather than the computer. Also there are a lot of not so technical people who still like to play games. It will be interesting to see how sucessful FFXI, and the other console online games fare.

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:Console MMORPGs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems likely that more younger gamers would be likely to play on the console rather than the computer.

      You've never played an mmorpg, have you? Kids don't have any problems with computers, it's adults and seniors that get stuck.

    2. Re:Console MMORPGs by delphin42 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing I've spent more time playing mmorpgs than you have spent with kids. I know lots of under 10 kids who much prefer a gamepad to a keyboard. Most of them grow into playing both, but the youngest once prefer the console.

      --
      -- Adam
    3. Re:Console MMORPGs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess so, since I played computer games most of my life (and Atari 2600, NES, etc). I preferred the Atari until we had the TI 99-4/A, which was still cartridge based for the most part. Of course, I still played most of those games with joysticks (and have a couple of gamepads for my PC now). Still, there're more than enough people acting like kids (whether they're kids or not) in the average PC MMORPG that I wouldn't expect bringing more kids in would ever be a good thing.

  34. "Right" means different things to different people by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some people do not like to go after anyone they don't like. Some people even don't like to fight monsters.

    Which is fine! A problem that has often been mentioned in relation to MMORPGs is that everyone wants to be a king, a mighty warrior or a mage, and no one wants to play a peasant, underdog or craftsman. Existing MMORPGS have shown that that is not true: plenty of people do not mind roleplaying such a role. The truly succesful MMORPG will either cater to a sufficiently large group of one particular kind of player, or combine a multitude of play-styles, both within the game-world, and by having different worlds for different people (like the normal and the roleplay servers of Dark age of Camelot). I would prefer the second, since it will result in diversity, and create an opportunity to try different playstyles.

    That is the hard part, try and make all of the following play styles and roles viable:
    - people who like to play solo
    - people who like to team up
    - Hardcore / casual PvP'ers
    - Both casual and full-time players. A big, big problem with many of these games is that low-level characters cannot join up with the more experienced warriors and go hunting together
    - Craftsmen, peasants, merchants, diplomats, etc.
    - People playing for fame, for gold, for fun or for company.
    Also take in mind that people will switch from one role to the other often.

    Next is your environment. You need stable servers and good staff, to help out players in trouble, catch grief players and cheaters, and perhaps provide content as well.

    Lastly, players need to have an impact on the environment. This can take many forms, but the idea that your actions matter in the game is a big draw for many people.

    Most of todays MMORPSs seem to focus on fighting and/or PvP, and have no viable crafter classes. The ever so popular 1st person view makes having conversations with more than 2 people rather hard Compare looking at a tiny chat window that shows all text around you, to the overhead view of Ultima Online, where speech text appears over the heads of the people speaking. Whatever faults that game may have, they got that part right. Lack of meaningful, non-aggressive interaction and having only combat characters as a viable class makes all the current MMORPGs a rather bland experience. Excepting Ultima Online: I have tried all the others, but I have never given up on that one. It is still the game with by far the widest possible range of play styles.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  35. Totally wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, Dreamcast was round one of the console online wars.

    Second off, Sonys plan is absolutely terrible. I don't know about you, but most people will not spend $170+ for a HD+Modem just to get online. XBox has a built-in adaptor and people have gotten online before Sony even got to the door with Halo already.

    Third off, Most of Nintendos games will feature online multiplayer (Mario Kart, Tennis, Party, etc) .. Not just PSO.

    Round two has just begun, and PS2 will most likely fail due to the hefty price to get online.

    1. Re:Totally wrong... by phong3d · · Score: 1
      ...but most people will not spend $170+ for a HD+Modem just to get online

      Most people may not, but I will. The problem with console peripherals in the past was there really wasn't any added value other than eye candy - the Genesis' vaporware VR system or its all-too-real (and dreadfully unsuccessful) 32X come to mind, as well as the TurboBooster for the TG16 or the Sega CD (which I liked - I never could get through Sol-Feace though.

      Anyway, this is a different situation. Not only will you get a modem/ethernet adapter, but you'll get a hard drive that any game developer can access. This may open the doors for custom football teams, gargantuan RPG's that can be one-time loaded onto the HDD and played without disk switching, new worlds and monsters for Everquest can be immediately downloaded ... the possibilities are far deeper than any previous console add-on has offered, and I think that prior paradigm will give way to the huge leaps this can offer to almost any gamer.

    2. Re:Totally wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Sonys plan is absolutely terrible. I don't know
      > about you, but most people will not spend $170+
      > for a HD+Modem just to get online. XBox has a
      > built-in adaptor

      Um, PS2 has HD+Modem+*Ethernet* (for DSL). PLUS you aren't locked into Microsoft's proprietary framework (ever used MSN? ugh...). It takes Sony virtually NO TIME to drop the price-- and they'll do that if they need to.

      On the other hand, Microsoft will have a lot more work on it's hand trying to expand it's infrastructure so people can do the most important thing... play games online RELIABLY.

    3. Re:Totally wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US the hard drive and network adaptor are sold separately, and a huge number of games won't need the HDD. The network adapter by itself costs $39.95... More than a controller but less than a game. $40 plus no monthly fees beats built-in equipment and $10/month hands-down...

  36. Interesting moderation again... (OT) by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    A post about (open sourced) WorldForge is marked Informative, while a similar post about Shadowbane is labelled "Offtopic". What gives?

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Interesting moderation again... (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly, I found the worldforge project quite interesting. Whereas I couldn't give a damn about Shadowbane.

      I suppose because there might be something I can do to help a Free project. I suppose if you'd said: hey Shadowbane is looking for developpers, testers and people-to-look-at-their-code-and-steal-any-good-id eas-and-start-their-own-version then I might have been interested.

  37. How long until by fliptw · · Score: 0

    People start commiting suicide over this game. Seriously. if evercracked managed one, then an FF MMORPG will, unfortunatly, produce many more. then how long until the man starts tighting the screws.

  38. duh by mokomuku · · Score: 1

    ummmm like.. whats an 'MMORPG'?

    1. Re:duh by Dalaram · · Score: 1

      MMORPG stands for Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game. The gist of it is that a large server runs a game world, in which many players can connect and interact with each others and their environment with a role playing setting. Some prime examples are Everquest, Dark Age of Camelot, and the upcoming Star Wars Galaxies.

      --
      all my .sig are suck
    2. Re:duh by mokomuku · · Score: 1

      I can dig it.

  39. Re:"Right" means different things to different peo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the designer of A Tale in the Desert - sounds like what you're looking for has lots in common with our game. Our game in fact has no combat, but it is very much a MMORPG.

  40. Mirrors? by PhoenxHwk · · Score: 2

    Anyone have a mirror? I'm bored at work!

  41. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by Flarg! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My major problem is, while walking, I tend to think, "Hey, I'm tired of walking and that's a nice car! I should just jack it."

    --

    I may be wrong, but I'm never uncertain.

  42. Stop sucking linux dick for Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's freaking pathetic. Take some time, form a coherent, original thought, and post it.

    1. Re:Stop sucking linux dick for Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and I are certainly ones to talk, huh.

  43. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by IHavePowers · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm to busy looking for hookers to think about all that other stuff. :)

  44. Since its ./ed... by CNERD · · Score: 1

    try herefor some more ffxi screenshots

  45. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by scjelli · · Score: 0

    definately...
    i was crossing the street and i saw a car coming at me that wasn't slowing down. my first thought was "where the hell is the strafe button!!"

  46. Must be running MS software by Anti-Microsoft+Troll · · Score: 0

    Servers unable to handle the load? Must be running Microsoft.

  47. A fun "underground" MMORPG by reachinmark · · Score: 1
    I'm still hoping that someone will get the MMORPG right in the not so distant future

    I just recently found a small but well built MMORPG that is slowly gaining popularity. The game engine itself is constantly evolving to fix bugs and add new features - but is incredibly robust and stable. They have solved most of the MM issues in fairly interesting ways. Check it out! Astonia v3 (of course, like most sites, a little slash-dotting would probably kill it ;).

  48. Why Final Fantasy XI will survive by IHavePowers · · Score: 1

    One great thing about Square and its money making power, is that every now in then it can afford to try to do something different. The movie was a big failure, but from the look of things this game is already a hit in Japan. A few server problems will not destroy Square's chances. Many American MMORPG all had startup problems, but still managed to become a hit. Some consoles have had horrible launches over there and still have the largest installed base. However, the real reason is because it is Final Fantasy. It and Dragon Quest, are some of the most popular games over there. Its like Star Wars over here. You hear all these people talking about play the Star Wars MMORPG. Why, because its Star Wars.

    1. Re:Why Final Fantasy XI will survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Square rarely ever does anything different, and their non-FF games were developed by third party companies and published by Square.

      FF Tactics- Quest Software
      Ehrgeiz- Namco and Lightweight
      Bouncer- Dream Factory
      Tobal- Dream Factory
      Vagrant Story- Mostly done by contracted Quest employees
      Bushido Blade- Lightweight

      Even the immortal Chrono Trigger was partially done by Enix Employees.

      And how many of these games are actually good? Only a handful. But wow, you can have great grphics with the new Final Fantasy games. I just don't get some people.

  49. Re: Hookers by Te1waz · · Score: 3, Funny

    This the bit I am dreading about a multiplayer GTA. Then when you stop for a hooker, it'll really be some huge sailer with a beard playing as a hooker and I'll feel really dirty afterwards...

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
  50. Re:"Right" means different things to different peo by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    Ultima Online had plenty of options for crafting, but it loses its appeal when you see someone selling on eBay the exact same products your charcter labored to make. Guess whos stuff sells faster?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  51. Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic by Win-Developer · · Score: 0

    I would rather play the upcoming Star Wars MMRPG, than Final Fantasy. It's also XBOX exclusive.

  52. What's with MMORPGs? by khyron664 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, what's so great about MMORPGs? Do people just like throwing money away? You have to pay to get the game on your system (whether it be PC or console) and then you have to pay a monthly fee to play the game. Let's take a normal rate of $10/month. That's $120/year just to PLAY a game you probably paid atleast $35 to get, plus the cost of an ISP. Does anyone realize that's just stupid? Do you REALLY need a game that never ends, sucks all your money out of the bank, and withdraws you from a real social life? Why are people happy this is coming to the console games?

    I realize everyone's tastes are different, but online games seem extremely expensive to me. Diablo II was a game that never really ended and I just paid a one time flat fee to buy the game. Why would I want to spend even more money to play such a game online?

    I've played almost every FF game since FF 1 on NES, and with the exception of FF8, I've largely enjoyed all of them. I am bummed that FFXI is a MMORPG game simply because I begin to wonder if they'll target all their future RPGs for onling play. I will not play online games with the current cost structure (I have a hard time justifying paying $50 for a game and usually wait until they become $20). Square has largely been a reliable source for great RPGs (with a few exceptions), and if they start making online games only, what's left to fill the void? I've always enjoyed RPG games and would be rather upset if they all went online and as such disappeared from my gaming life.

    I for one am bummed. Anyone know if FFXII will be online also?

    Khyron
    1. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Seriously, what's so great about the internet? Do people just like throwing money away? You have to pay to get your system (whether it be PC or console) and then you have to pay a monthly fee to use it. Let's take a normal rate of $50/month. That's $600/year just to USE a computer you probably paid at least $1000 to get, plus the cost of an operating system. Does anyone realize that's just stupid? Do you REALLY need a web site that never ends, sucks all your money out of the bank, and withdraws you from a real social life? Why are people happy posting to /.?

      *smile* Sorry, couldn't resist.

      Hmmm, comparisons:

      MMPORPG - $10/month
      Cable Modem - $50/month
      Electricity - $100/month
      Food - $200/month
      Car - $400/month
      House - $700/month

      You know.. I don't think $10/month is gonna make much of a dent, and it will probably give me 5-10 hours of entertainment a week for a good 4-6 months. If it seems like alot of money to you... are you by chance a college student?

    2. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I am in the work place making a very good salary, but I tend to be very cost conscience.



      $10/mo isn't a huge dent in terms of other expenses, but when most people (including myself) are used to paying $20-$50 for the lifetime of a game, $10/mo is painfully expensive. Especially since the games can never be beaten; which is usually the point where people stop playing a game. I'm not a fan of constant expenses and avoid them where I can (some obviously can't be). Just like I won't be using .NET style online software that requires me to pay per use.

    3. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      House - $700/month

      lol, I guess there is one huge benefit to living outside of California, $1200/month is cheap rent for a 3 bedroom home. Nevermind actually buying a house.

    4. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by cybercrap · · Score: 0

      I hear ya, living in austin. 2 bedroom apartment is $1000/month.

    5. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by Lictor · · Score: 2

      >Seriously, what's so great about MMORPGs? Do people just like throwing money away?

      I'm not a big fan myself.. but in some cases MMORPGs are more than worth the money. A friend of mine has a daughter that lives in another state (messy divorce, custody, and so forth) and he only gets to see her a few times a year. While talking on the phone provides a nice communication link... there is also something to be said for spending 'recreation time' with one's loved ones. In his case, EverQuest allows him an opportunity to "do something" with his daughter that he might otherwise not have. I believe he feels this is easily worth $120/yr.

      I doubt, however, that he is the typical MMORPG player ;) Just wanted to point out that its a nice way for people to spend time with each other without having to worry about pesky details like physical co-location. It certainly doesn't replace face-to-face time... but its better than nothing.

    6. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago's just as bad. $890/month for a one bedroom in a safe neighborhood. One bedroom and a den is ~$1000/month. Two bedrooms are $1200+/month.

    7. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before I started playing MMORPGs I used to buy at least one new game every month. Sometimes I would buy 2. Thats about how long it takes to burn out on most games... a week or 2 at the most for me.

      When I started playing MMORPGs I only had to buy 1 game a year... the monthly fee was a fraction of what I was paying for games before. It saved me thousands of dollars.

    8. Re:What's with MMORPGs? by gid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not too mention you have to play constantly to build up a half ass character to compete with all the other people that play that game 8 hours a day while doing tech support or some other job that has the potential to give you free time.

      I have a real hard time spending $50 a game myself. Ok, buy FFXI and spend $120/year... or buy Dugeon Seige with a one time fee and play agains real life, or previously known net friends whenever I feel like it.

      I sit in front of a computer 8 hours a day during work and a fair ammount of time screwing around when at home. So I pick the games I play wisely. Just what a I need, another reason to site in front of my computer. I'm trying to ween myself away form the computer now and then. They don't call it evercrack for nothing...

      I've always avoided all games that suck up enourmous ammounts of time like the plauge. Civilaztion, The Simms, Settler, UO, EQ, etc, and now FFXI. Forget that, I wanna be entertained by a game, not sucked into for months on end. There's a reason movies only last 2 hours. :)

  53. Blaa... by BagOBones · · Score: 1

    I'm not all that excited about this game.. I have played several of the past ones and found them lacking.. Sure the story and graphics draw you into the game but once you set the game down its very hard to pick back up if you have forgotten what your last objective was.. Then you end up wondering the map asking characters questions until you get an idea of whats going one.. Often I would wonder the map only to hit what seemed like hundreds of those stupid random encounters with monsters.. Sure it levels your characters up but I find the whole pause, click , pause fighting system boring. I'll admit some of the mini games where rather entertaining.

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
  54. Butterfly Grid by DeadBugs · · Score: 4, Interesting
    IBM and Butterfly.net are working to create a new network for Massive Mutliplayer Online Gaming. They are hoping to license the technology to companies such as Sony.
    Here are some of the highlights:

    Unlimited numbers of players within one persistent-state world

    Advance, Distributed Artificial Intelligence

    Every game genre

    Multiple, concurrent games

    Any connected device

    Hot-swappable components

    Shared-source developer sandbox

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Butterfly Grid by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it is also interesting to note that IBM is in a very tight relationship with Nintendo (they did develop Gekko, the Cube's CPU, after all). There is also talk that an IBM micro-drive will be the harddrive add-on used by the Cube (that would be darn cool). If this is true, what kind of relationship does Nintendo have with them in this deal???

  55. OT the site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder I couldn't connect this morning! I hope /. did not hurt the new gameforms too badly. Finally after a month with out the GIA they get this site up, and then exprerience the ./ effect a few weeks after launching.

  56. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by Te1waz · · Score: 1

    If I were in your situation I'd be cursing that I'd not brought my Rocket Launcher or my Tank...

    Yeah, take 'im out before 'e gets you!!!

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
  57. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2

    I once had an experience sort of like B. After playing Spy Hunter a lot (this was back in the days when it was new), one day I had a momentary urge to drive into the back of a red 18-wheeler. Of course it didn't put its ramp down.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  58. Re:"Right" means different things... by Lightwarrior · · Score: 2, Informative

    The post implies "Right" has something to do with a bug-free launch. Which Dark Age of Camelot did - it was playable from Day 1. No framerate issues, no server issues - they were the *first MMOG in HISTORY* to get this right. UO had server issues, EQ had server issuses, not sure about AC - but I bet it had server issues, and let's not even get into AO or WWIIO (ie, massive problems that rendered the games unplayable for months).

    The other MMOGs had stuff going for them, but DAoC has been the only one with a good launch.

    -lw

    --
    Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
    World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
  59. (c) 2001?? by mister+sticky · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that those shots have (c)2001 in the bottom right hand corner??
    2001 was almost half a year ago, am I missing something?

    1. Re:(c) 2001?? by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. I had to look this up, too. Apperently it takes longer than 5 months to make a game.

      </sarcasm>

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    2. Re:(c) 2001?? by chevybowtie · · Score: 1

      IX, X, and XI were all demo'ed before IX even came out...

  60. Honda v Harley.... by MosesJones · · Score: 2


    Err so this is why the World Superbikes, 500cc, 250cc and in fact every division is dominated by European or Japanese bikes. This is the very top level of the sport, and not an American bike in sight.

    Bloody hell there really is none so blind as those that will not see.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Honda v Harley.... by jgerman · · Score: 2

      What did I just get done saying? Talk about blind, SpuperBike is NOT the only racing for bikes out there. Did I not JUST get done talking about BattleTrax. Are you so completely stupid that you can't read a whole post and understand it. Again, bring your Jap bike to BattleTrax I'll smoke you on my Buell. Is it the best bike out there, no. There's no such thing, is it the best handling bike, yes. Is it American, yes. Will it lose on a superbike course, yes. Is Superbike the only thing that defines the quality of a bike, no.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    2. Re:Honda v Harley.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battletrax = little kids
      SBK = professionals

      Buell = tricycle
      Aprilla = Motorbike

    3. Re:Honda v Harley.... by jgerman · · Score: 2

      Heh, that's what I figured. And that's what rice burners like to think, they need some sort of external validation, but when it comes to performance out come the squids. Trying to disparage something just because their bike can't handle it is the mark of a child, or an idiot.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  61. Re:"Right" means different things to different peo by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    Well said.
    Unfortunately, the game I have been most looking forward to seems to have been placed on hold.

    http://www.worldofmidgard.com/

    From the descriptions, it sounds like a game that tries to emphasize role-playing, and politics rather than orc-bashing. I like smacking orcs as well as the next hu-man, but it would be refreshing to see a game offer something more than the kill->levelup->repeat treadmill.

  62. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by Galvatron · · Score: 2

    The thing that always gets me is lack of a save button. "Okay, I've got a final in Financial Markets. I'll save before I go in, so that if I do badly I can reload and take it again."

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  63. Shazbot! Re:Fingers crossed by ChozSun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You stole my thunder :)

    To get a MMORPG right, first take out the first M. In all of my years of enjoying RPG's whether it be pen & paper or video games, I have never enjoyed it with 2500 other people, I only enjoyed it with 4 or 5 other people.

    As soon as people realize that camping out spawns is not a true RPG, more and more people will realize that anything multi-massive anything is not the way to go.

    My hope is not for NWN to be kickass (because the geek boy in me is wishing to God that it is) but for the game to be revolutionary.

    --
    ChozSun
    ChozSun.com
  64. Pass on FFXI by Myxyplik · · Score: 1

    From my understanding of FFXI's play structure, it just doesn't appeal to me. You pretty much have to be in a group and someone has to be appointed a leader. I put up with that shit in my college courses, I don't want to deal with that when I'm playing games. And anyway, I'm turned off by team-based games (thanks to the whiners and assholes in Tribes); give me some good old-fashioned Free-for-all action!

  65. Slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The server seems to be fine now. A bit slow, but the stuff is coming through.

  66. What we really need by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    Is a MMORPG based on Zork.

  67. Re:"Right" means different things to different peo by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    I agree with you - some people want to play tradesman, some want to play peasants, and some want to play adventurers. And there's all kinds of other things and shades in between.

    The real issue is that you have to allow for this without forcing it. What if nobody wants to play a serf? Ok, that's fine... but how do you replace the function that they were supposed to serve, without making who play the role have to compete too much against the game itself? If they don't serve a function then what's the point of having them at all?

    And you have to balance the need/not-needed very, very finely or else things get out of whack badly (look at clerics in EQ - single most necessary class in the game and the single most boring, mind-numbing class to play too, especially at the uber end of the game. My wife played one. I played an enchanter. Neither of us play anymore.)

    The craft issue becomes a problem because it's a lot easier to add an item to a monster than it is to add 5 items in various spots in the world and add a recipe to create the original item you wanted to create in the first place. Plus you start entering trust issues with tradesman in a world where there's little recourse.

  68. Technical Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gameforms seems to be Slashdotted at the moment, so the same information about launch day technical problems is available at http://www.rpgamer.com

    1. Re:Technical Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Gameforms server seems fine to me. A bit slow, but useable.

  69. Near Perfect MMORPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is only in beta but it is one of the best and most unique Online RPGs I have ever played. www.ataleinthedesert.com. eGenesis may have perfected the MMORPG genre. Play tests are scheduled randomly so sign up for email and they will send you an email before a test happens.

  70. Why kill gameforms.com for this common story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apparently, there's some serious technical problems with the server load as well."

    ...just like at the poor fledgling [slashdotted] site, gameforms.com. [sigh], looks like I'll be donating to gameforms soon-to-be-created server/bandwidth fund, just like I did for theGIA, since I really want this, one of the last fan-driven sites, to succeed. Thanks.

  71. Can't you just... by Ixe · · Score: 1

    ...feel the love in this place?

    What would the world be like without ACs :)
    Sorry if I was too vague, I'm not trying to whore for karma here, really. I'm just giving my $0.02.

    --
    Sigs pose an operational security risk and help the baddies aggregate data. I guess commenting does too, oops.
  72. Re:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic by Carnivore24 · · Score: 1

    That looks pretty good. Looks like I should have not posted since 50% of my post was not on topic...

  73. Meaningless? by Prio · · Score: 1

    Life outside of video games ("real life") features many, many qualities that video gaming does not (at present). "Real Life" engages all of one's senses - wind on one's face, straining in the joints and muscles, actual sounds produced by the genuine articles rather than speakers which can presently only do so much, the sensations of hugging or touching another being (and getting touched back in realtime - not necessarily sexually).
    In addition, "Real Life" utilizes a more complex, more widespread, and far more long-term algorithm than any known computer game.
    I give "Real Life" four stars out of five - one star off for the many frustrating and annoying aspects that seem to run rampant throughout the entirety of the work.

    Disclaimer: This brief review of "Real Life" is elitist and worthless, because it makes a value judgement. Values are meaningless. Have a nice day, whatever a "nice day" is.


    ...my ISP just hung up on me FOUR TIMES in a row right after I connected. My ISP sucks. (Note: My ISP may or may not suck according to some interpretations that may or may not be more or less valid.)

    1. Re:Meaningless? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Life outside of video games ("real life") features many, many qualities that video gaming does not (at present).

      Oh, give me a break - a stage musical also lacks many qualities of experience, but that doesn't mean it doesn't hold quality. Got news for you - playing video games, going to see a stage production, playing Nine Man's Morris, or watching Evil Dead with a group of friends is all *part* of "Real Life".

      --
      evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Meaningless? by Prio · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that stage musicals and video games held no quality, now did I, smartypants? I love people who don't actually read what I'm posting...

  74. Re:If you're looking for a MMOG that gets it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll belive Shadowbane exists when it's released. They spend 2 consecutive years at E3 with little progress to show (almost none in fact) It could be vaporware.

  75. Misconceptions? by haggar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not a gamer, but armed with a little bit of knowledge and common sense, find many posts a bit strange.

    People say: 150$ to get online is a lot/not a lot. Well, 150 is the HD + Eth. card, but since you don't need the HD, you can get online for 40$ (price of the Eth. addon).

    People say: PS2 doesn't have an advantage because Xbox will have online games, too. Well gee, PS2 has an online game right fucking now. If that's not an advantage, I don't know what is. And FF fanatics will get on the bandwagon, I believe. The Xbox doesn't have a title with a solid reputation and broad following.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:Misconceptions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Final Fantasy XI does require a hard drive and a modem, and the software and you have to install it on the hard drive. Not only that but you have to upgrade with patches.

      As much as you thought Microsoft was bad, this is the same thing with Final Fantasy XI. Sorry, but thats just the facts.

      If you want to know about xbox's online games, wait until E3 and by Christmas 2002 you will know everything.

      Who cares if Sony is out there first, if its crap, and you have to extra stuff and have people install all of that crap it isn't worth it and if you want future proof, just look how its bombing in Japan right now. :)

      I don't know about you, but I am not about to spend my hard earned money and blow it on something (hardware and software) that right now isn't even online and ONLY being used for ONE game. Thanks but no thanks. :)

  76. Re:"Right" means different things to different peo by Misao · · Score: 1

    > (look at clerics in EQ - single most necessary class in the game and the single most boring,
    > mind-numbing class to play too, especially at the uber end of the game. My wife played one. I
    > played an enchanter. Neither of us play anymore.)

    There is an excellent argument to be made that you played the _second_ (if not the first) most necessary class in the game; and although more exciting than the cleric, most of the excitement is due to the fact that 'chanters are also the most reliant class in the game...

    On the other hand.. cleric + enchanter? Bet you never had any problems getting a party....

    -misao

  77. Re:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic is not an MMORPG. It's a (mostly) single-player game created by Bioware. You are thinking of Star Wars: Galaxies, the MMORPG offering coming from Verant sometime this year or next.

  78. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by spectral · · Score: 1

    If someone cut me up, I'd be VERY angry as well!

  79. Re:Japan and bugs.... HD bashing by ThunderBucket · · Score: 1

    Don't be lulled into a feeling that they can't build things better in Japan.... imagine Honda v Harley Davidson in a race.
    People make mistakes, robots do not. I'll take a nice shiny new 2003 Honda ST1300 and pocket the $7000 difference between that and a hog. And if the bikes are like the cars, I'll call you in 400,000 miles to see how the Harley is doing.
    Seriously, though, Harleys are really reliable. In fact, over 90% of Harleys ever built are still on the road today! Yup. The other 10% made it home.
    How are Harleys like hound dogs? Both like to ride in the back of pickup trucks.
    I have a hard time taking HD bikes seriously. A guy on a brand new bike comes roaring up the HOV lane about 70, sees me on a 1993 Gold Wing (which set me back a whopping $3000), and tries to pass me. I'm in overdrive, and he can't pass me even redlining his engine. Why should I pay $15,000 or more for an inferior American product? I don't buy the cars, and I'm sure as hell not buying a Harley.

    --

    "All I do is eat and poop!" -- Bean
  80. Re:Stay safe out there, everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After a weeklong binge on GTA2 last year, I finally broke down and had to get some food. On the way to the store a guy pulled up next to me in a new Ferrarri. Swear to God I was about to carjack this guy. Having nothing but the ID paying attention for an entire week is a dangerous thing...