Slashdot Mirror


FBI Carnivore Screwup Destroys E-Mail Evidence

An Anonymous Coward writes: "The FBI apparently used Carivore in an attempt to collect information on Osama bin Laden't network. Unfortunately they screwed up and collected information on "non-covered targets" (*ahem*, isn't this the sort of thing we weren't supposed to worry about...). Then the FBI tech was "so upset" that he destroyed ALL of the collected email, not only the information that was not covered by the warrant. Here is the SF Gate Story and EPIC's press release."

296 comments

  1. No backups? by Papineau · · Score: 1

    They didn't do a backup of the evidence before somebody could destroy it?

    1. Re:No backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the FBI - they can't afford the storage needed for backups =)

    2. Re:No backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even know what to writeoff as propaganda anymore. Is the message supposed to be "on the occasion that unauthorized data was collected, it was a big fucking deal and we erased it"? Or is the FBI really a bunch of bumbling idiots that can't run data collection tools? Or are they trying to throw us off? Eh, back to sleep...

    3. Re:No backups? by ParticleGirl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They just aren't advertising backups. The memo said that the agent was so upset that she deleted the email. An agent contributed my favorite quote in the article:

      A Justice Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Tuesday night that the e-mails were not destroyed. The official did not elaborate or try to reconcile the statement with the memo.

      Yeah, I'm sure there are backups. I'm sure the FBI is avoiding confirming that there are records somewhere of emails captured from "non-target" subjects, while trying to cover its ass in re: losing evidence.

      --
      Do something about world hunger. Click here
    4. Re:No backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical federal government ineptitude--why should anyone be surprised?

    5. Re:No backups? by sqlrob · · Score: 2

      I didn't know VB was available for Linux.

    6. Re:No backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wait till slashdot becomes yesterday's fad, they'll change their tune

  2. great by MikeAR303 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    they could have at least kept the terrorist evidence. ahem... first post.

    --
    This post will be modded down for no particular reason by a sweaty 14 year old who is not allowed out past dark.
  3. better than nothing by blablablastuff · · Score: 1

    it was just osama's pr0n password. he isn't gonna use email anyway, CNN told everyone the government would read osama's mail. come on

    1. Re:better than nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If someone wanted a secret Email box to recieive messages, anyone could just create a hotmail account like "hjh456@hotmail.com" - one for each day's use. There is NO WAY carnivore will capture that.

      Floppy disks with PGP keys are used to decrypt the message.

      These accounts could be setup WEEKS ago, one for each day. They would be un-traceable.

      From one who knows...

    2. Re:better than nothing by packeteer · · Score: 1

      from one who knows???... an AC... ok first of all its not untracable... know how much a carnivore bo can hold? neither do i but i would bet it a least a couple hndred gigs... so it would be very easy for them to keep a back log of the last coupld months of email...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:better than nothing by meatspray · · Score: 1

      i'll give you floppy disks with pgp keys, but don'cha think maybe free pseudo anonymous email might be tracked?

      especially containing large blocks of heavily encrypted PGP text. i'f it were my job (and it's not) i'd have backbone sniffers all over hotmail server sites (yahoo,aol too) and anything US incoming or outgoing.

      I'd be holding on to anything that resembled an encrypted email. Capturing the data is easy, sorting through it automatically and sending back only pertinant data would be the tough part.

      --Mike

    4. Re:better than nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this may not be the most reliable source of information, but this is from howstuffworks.com:
      The computer consists of:
      * A Pentium III Windows NT/2000 system with 128 megabytes (MB) of RAM
      * A commercial communications software application
      * A custom C++ application that works in conjunction with the commercial program above to provide the packet sniffing and filtering
      * A type of physical lockout system that requires a special passcode to access the computer (This keeps anyone but the FBI from physically accessing the Carnivore system.)
      * A network isolation device that makes the Carnivore system invisible to anything else on the network (This prevents anyone from hacking into the system from another computer.)
      * A 2-gigabyte (GB) Iomega Jaz drive for storing the captured data (The Jaz drive uses 2-GB removable cartridges that can be swapped out as easily as a floppy disk.)

    5. Re:better than nothing by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Well, lets say you were a person who wanted to use email to coordinate the takeover of the world or something like that, first off, find a new way of communicating =). Second off, if I were serious about this, I would setup 1000 hotmail accounts a day, email an encrypted file with every account every day, yet only one have the real deal. By the time they figure out whats going on its too late.

    6. Re:better than nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that. Send mail like this:
      "OMG! Like I totally loved my like trip to like Florida! OMG! Here's a picture! OMG OMG it was like so totally cool!"

      Then attach a pic with the embedded message. Helluva lot harder for the FBI to figure out that it's actually the mail of Evildoers instead of retarded 20-somethings.

    7. Re:better than nothing by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      wait...what's the difference again?

    8. Re:better than nothing by packeteer · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean that it doesn't have an internal hard drive that can have data taken off with the jaz drive. If one could simply pull out the disc it would be very easy for someone to take out its storage capacity...

      Then again they COULD just lie to us :)

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  4. Fbi Document by alphaseven · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the original FBI memo: http://www.epic.org/privacy/carnivore/fisa.html

    1. Re:Fbi Document by NateSac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it just me or does the FBI have the worst copy machines in existance?

      --
      ::i visited slashdot and all i got was this lousy sig::
    2. Re:Fbi Document by chuckcolby · · Score: 1

      With a name like "Marion", I'd want to be called "Spike" (or something like it), too.

      --
      We all get along together like tornadoes and trailer parks.
    3. Re:Fbi Document by shadowbearer · · Score: 0


      not to mention the person(s) using the "blackout pen" are either really
      clutzy in in a great hurry.....

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:Fbi Document by Anonynnous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only the ones used to copy FOIA-released documents.

    5. Re:Fbi Document by Oestergaard · · Score: 1

      The URL says it all.

      "Fis a'" means "bugger off" in Danish ;)

    6. Re:Fbi Document by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, perhaps I'm missing something, but why is the memo dated 4/5/00 ? Note also the fax header which denotes receipt on APR 07 '00.

      This is a pre-2001/09/11 memo!

  5. Yeah right by dmanny · · Score: 1

    Now we will here that their own forensic data recovery types will suceed -- but only the /bin/laden data, of course.

    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
    1. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Hear: You hear the cars honking.

      Here: The pizza is here!

      Thank You.

    2. Re:Yeah right by CharlezManning · · Score: 1
      Hey, anal wally...

      Hear: You hear the cars honking.

      The horns honk, not the cars :-).

  6. This is just something to make us feel better. by TheDick · · Score: 1

    "Oh, those privacy minded techs who read our email, they destroy it if its not covered by a warrant, we can trust the FBI"

    Yea right.

    --

    1. Re:This is just something to make us feel better. by ph8ts2l · · Score: 1

      I'm wishing the agent who deleted the messages did so out of a creeping awareness of the gross violation of privacy to which this botched evidence-gathering amounted. The story never said exactly why the agent was "so upset," so I can dream...

    2. Re:This is just something to make us feel better. by allism · · Score: 1

      The agent probably realized the captured e-mail included the graphic messages he was sending to his co-worker he was shtupping...

  7. Damn them! by reynolds_john · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is a geek to do when he can't rely on his own government to keep secret, accurate, and complete backups of his email!?

  8. Yeah... by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Gotta be more careful with those rm -rf 's

    1. Re:Yeah... by Ieshan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, he must of have forgot the Laden:

      rm -rf /bin/laden

      We all know he just typed:

      rm -rf /bin.

    2. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      not rm -rf... it runs on NT.. the stuff is probably still in the trash bin, or recycle box, or refuse pile, or Whatever-TF they call it.

    3. Re:Yeah... by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2

      That ain't funny! One time, I installed AOL's aim program for linux (back before I knew there was gaim) and gave it a try. Unfortunately it's just a simple tar.gz so I untarred it in my home directory. There was no compilation. It installed everything under /home/alan/usr/local. I decided it sucked (and it does) so I was going to remove it.

      alan@darkstar~$su
      root@darkstar:/home/alan#rm -fr /usr

      DOH!

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    4. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With our heavy-handed military and propaganda war, it would be more like rm -rf /

    5. Re:Yeah... by zCyl · · Score: 2

      And on a related note, do not ever EVER attempt to delete all hidden files with the command:

      rm -rf .*

      Login as root and do this in /root, and you've erased your entire harddrive. I'll leave the reason why as an exercise for the reader.

    6. Re:Yeah... by MShook · · Score: 1

      That's because you use a stupid shell... zsh doesn't expand .* into . and .. ! :-)

  9. Carnivore Attacks Gaming Websites Too by Jabberjab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Carnivore still around? I heard they were tracking gaming websites, particularly those that involve terrorists and counter-terrorists. Counterstrike is not only the number one online game right now, but there are many websites revolving around it. For example, NerdTreeHouse is a huge haven for Counterstrike fans and I heard the FBI requested information from them. I'm not sure what happened.

    1. Re:Carnivore Attacks Gaming Websites Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the FBI has good reason to want to use Carnivore and other tools to look at those types of activity. Granted, there are millions of gamers in the world, and I guess most are not planning an attack.

      Maybe we should ban any game that has terrorists or counter-terrorists. Probably movies too.

    2. Re:Carnivore Attacks Gaming Websites Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Shameless plug: Jabberjab has made three posts including the one above.... Here are the other two:

      #1 Sometimes these movies just don't turn out. Why not make a movie based on website? Can you imagine what a movie about Slashdot or NerdTreeHouse [nerdtreehouse.com] would look like? I want movies based on websites! Are you with me?

      #2 Java is certainly not going anywhere. Java is the very thing that allows some companies to be in business. For example, NerdTreeHouse [nerdtreehouse.com] is a company that uses 90% Linux and 10% BSD to power the entire company. Basically, they provide gaming servers to highschool and college kids. Without Java, the company won't be around.

    3. Re:Carnivore Attacks Gaming Websites Too by antistuff · · Score: 2, Funny

      I cant imagine why you know that but its mad funny. NOT OFFTOPIC by the way.

    4. Re:Carnivore Attacks Gaming Websites Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't surprise me at all.

      "Hey, this web page talks about terrorists and something called 'cow-strike' - probably some IRA ploy to spread deadly viruses to our cattle..."

      =)

  10. do they have backups of the porn spam? by schatten · · Score: 1

    I hope they have all the backups of the porn spam that I've been receiving lately. I'm sure I'm missing out on some good deals. Oh, and those "fake" paypal and icq activation emails too!

    why can't they track crap like that down too?

    1. Re:do they have backups of the porn spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting sick of tracking down Chinese Virus writers, and having the FBI totally ignore these kinds of things.

      I just let the ISP's deal with it now. Trying to get them (FBI) involved in a USEFUL investigation is like trying to talk to a wall.

      I'm not talking about frivolous "click kiddy" here, I'm talking about some serious threats we see every day. We know hot to deal with them tecnically, but they at least should know they DO exist, and someone is going to let their guard down, when someone skins their Corporate hide....

      From one who knows...

    2. Re:do they have backups of the porn spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? Because porn spam and "fake" paypal and icq activation emails haven't killed U.S. Civilians.

    3. Re:do they have backups of the porn spam? by Ronin+Jonin · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure about that... There have been many a time when all the spam has made me much more inclined to lash out against people. Can't you imagine that? A guy who goes bezerk because of all the spam and goes on a killing spree?

  11. check THIS out by drDugan · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.time.com/time/covers/1101020603/memo.html

    you've got to read it to believe it.

    1. Re:check THIS out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all I can say is ... wow

    2. Re:check THIS out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We knew the FBI was infected with communist agents; I'm not too surprised to find its full of Al Qaeda agents. The FBI (and CIA) have been worse than useless for a long time. Time for a purge.

    3. Re:check THIS out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're watching you...

    4. Re:check THIS out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely time for a purge. The last eight months have been a binge.

    5. Re:check THIS out by errxn · · Score: 1

      She advances "careerism" as the reason that the warning signs were deliberately overlooked. While this may be true, I tend to think that the part that NOBODY wants to admit is that FBI didn't want to be accused of racial profiling.

      Good ol' Political Correctness strikes again....

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    6. Re:check THIS out by Fourier · · Score: 1
      From the memo:

      To get to the point, I have deep concerns that a delicate and subtle shading/skewing of facts by you and others at the highest levels of FBI management has occurred and is occurring. The term "cover up" would be too strong a characterization which is why I am attempting to carefully (and perhaps over laboriously) choose my words here. I base my concerns on my relatively small, peripheral but unique role in the Moussaoui investigation in the Minneapolis Division prior to, during and after September 11th and my analysis of the comments I have heard both inside the FBI (originating, I believe, from you and other high levels of management) as well as your Congressional testimony and public comments.

      I feel that certain facts, including the following, have, up to now, been omitted, downplayed, glossed over and/or mis-characterized in an effort to avoid or minimize personal and/or institutional embarrassment on the part of the FBI and/or perhaps even for improper political reasons:

      1) It has recently come to light that two agents from the Unsolved Crimes division are closely investigating reports of what they characterize as an "alien bounty hunter." Our efforts at concealing the existence of this entity (see I.R. #26972, "Roswell Project") appear to have been inadequate. Agent Mulder in particular has sworn before this very committee that he is dedicated to finding, as he terms it, "the Truth." C.G.B. Spender has been instructed to deal with the situation, but some fear the damage has already been done.


      Very revealing stuff.

    7. Re:check THIS out by vovin · · Score: 1

      I hope that you are intending this to be humour. The memo in question is very revealing. It in fact details the massive amount of effort that MPLS office spent trying to get FBIHQ to allow MPLS FBI field agents to get a warrant to question/search Moussaoui and his laptop.
      - MPLS FBI initiated the INS for immediate custody (due to existing VISA overstay).
      - MPLS FBI suspect terrorist activty.
      - MPLS FBI got French Inteligence confirmation of terrorist/extremist ties to Al Queda etc.
      - MPLS FBI believe they have probable cause to get warrant from Minnesota AG.
      (The time frame here seems to be about 3 to 4 weeks prior to 9/11)
      - MPLS FBI must get permission from FBIHQ to contact MN AG (or FBIHQ must contanct MN AG)? I'm not clear on the exact protocol for this.
      - MPLS FBI are being activly thwarted by FBIHQ, reports are being editited/re-charactierized, French Inteligence is not added to requests, etc.

      Some quotes:

      ... the French Intelligence Service confirmed his affiliations with radical fundamentalist Islamic groups and activities connected to Osama Bin Laden ...agents' initial thought was to obtain a criminal search warrant, but in order to do so, they needed to get FBI Headquarters' (FBIHQ's) approval in order to ask for DOJ OIPR's approval to contact the United States Attorney's Office in Minnesota. Prior to and even after receipt of information provided by the French, FBIHQ personnel disputed with the Minneapolis agents the existence of probable cause to believe that a criminal violation had occurred/was occurring. As such, FBIHQ personnel refused to contact OIPR to attempt to get the authority....
      ...It's quite conceivable that many of the HQ personnel who so vigorously disputed Moussaoui's ability/predisposition to fly a plane into a building were simply unaware of all the various incidents and reports worldwide of Al Qaeda terrorists attempting or plotting to do so....I believe that Minneapolis agents actually brought this point to FBIHQ's attention on August 22, 2001, but HQ personnel apparently ignored the directive ...

    8. Re:check THIS out by vovin · · Score: 1

      On day one I said they knew that it was going to happen and let it happen. I feel even more stronly now. I believe that the ppl who let this happen:
      - Did not expect as much damage as actually occured. Recall that WTC was designed to handle the impact of a 727 w/o incident. It's been required for tall buildings since the Empire State building was hit by a plane ... 1945 Plane Crash
      Rocked NYC Empire State Building Hit by Military Plane, 14 Killed Sept ...
      - Wanted it to happen so as to forward their own agendas.

  12. FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by visualight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were expected to outline high-profile changes Wednesday at the FBI's headquarters, including closer ties to the CIA and an overhaul of the FBI's outdated computer systems.

    Does anyone believe for a second that the FBI's computer systems are outdated? Sounds like a spin job to me....

    Later watch the FBI try to attribute their missed tip-offs prior to 9/11 to slow computers. They'll have all kinds of "contributing" factors that'll spread the blame out thin enough so no one loses their job.

    --
    Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    1. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by SiMac · · Score: 1

      Reportedly, former FBI director Louis Freeh didn't use email, and as a result the computers weren't upgrade.

      IIRC I heard it on CNN.

    2. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by tssm0n0 · · Score: 1

      Yes. They are horribly outdated. They are working on making some very sophisticated systems, but for now they are stuck with some ancient computers. These aren't the kind of computers that can be updated with a quick trip to wal-mart, the FBI requires machines that are capable of storing, retrieving, and search huge amounts of digital data (including documents that have been scanned in, as well as pictures and movies). These don't come cheap, and they don't come easily.

    3. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone believe for a second that the FBI's computer systems are outdated?

      Yes. It's true. The FBI really does still use proprietary software.

    4. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by duckygator · · Score: 2, Funny

      I found it a bit odd that the scanned memo someone pointed to here is a print from an Outlook email client. Maybe the "missing" emails will be randomly sent to 50 contacts from their Lookout! address book by one of the email viruses floating around. I didn't figure the FBI would be running such an unsecure messaging platform. Maybe their systems really are "outdated."

    5. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Well, they had been powered by Athlon XP 2000+ processors but the someone checked out pricewatch.com and discovered the 2100+.
      The ones that are going first are the REALLY old ones with the IDE ATA-100 harddrives. Gotta have ATA-133! Now natually these are only the lowend machines for the normal office worker, the database servers must be MUCH more powerfull.

      Cheers,
      Jonathan

    6. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...including documents that have been scanned in...

      It would be a hell of a lot easier to scan in if they weren't all tilted on the page like most FOIA documents.

    7. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by delong · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who modded this up as interesting?

      This is the sort of ignorance that should have been completely destroyed by 9/11. Why do you not believe that the FBI has severely outdated machines? Because the typical Slashdotter has an extremely distorted perception of the scope and extent of governmental power and efficacy. When the CIA starts up a venture capital firm to fund technology ideas to jump start itself in playing catch-up with the private sector, that says something. When the NSA goes on 60 Minutes and says "we're friggin way behind," that speaks volumes. The government USED to have the biggest and the best. Today, the private sector, as far as information technology goes, is WAY ahead of the agencies.

      Remember, when Clinton entered office in 93, there WERE NO COMPUTERS in the White House! They still USED TELETYPES. In 93!

      Derek

    8. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by oasisbob · · Score: 1
      Remember, when Clinton entered office in 93, there WERE NO COMPUTERS in the White House! They still USED TELETYPES. In 93!

      Not true... While I don't contest the idea that the Federal Government may have some very stagnant technology in certain areas, the above statement is not true. The White House *did* have email (and therefore computers) in 1993.

      See this site (from a 30 sec Google search) for more details.

    9. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's you who's confused. Yes, there is outdated equipment in some highly visible places. But do you really believe that when the NSA needs to crack your private key they're carting in 386es to help in the job? Of course not. Where the equipment is needed, it is purchased. If some department needs to analyze and model traffic flows through a certain backbone router, you can bet your bottom dollar (or is that top dollar, footed by taxpayers of course?) that no money is spared to acquire the necessary resources. Besides, the black project places are working on equipment that makes the declassified stuff released to the public today look like Fisher Price kiddie toys.

    10. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      When the NSA goes on 60 Minutes and says "we're friggin way behind," that speaks volumes.

      I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist, but I seem to remember something pointing to official reports about what development year the CIA was in computer hardware / software. We (the world outside of the US govt) are in something like development year 35, roughly, or were at the time of this report. Basically that means that we have had the equivalant of 35 years worth of development on computers since they became redily available to the public. This doesn't mean it was 35 years ago or something, computer development has supposedly progressed more development years than real years.
      That said, the CIA released at some point they were in development year 87.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    11. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha what a funny comment... rotflmao, and then you realize it is no fiction at all and that even systems that are used by people that are involved with carnivore collected data run outbreak. This data may not even be filtered as the court order specifies, does the court really understand whats going on when presented with basicly a tcpdump filter expresion, do they have an *objective* technical review of the filtering applied? This very story is about a carnivore box which captured to much data.

      It would be entirely posible that a judge would create a court order that is not specific on the technical details of the filter (how does a device connected to an isp border router know what of ip`s it should drop packets from, Would it have acces to the radius authentication data when connected to a border router??? unlikely) so the tech adapting the carnivore box for this particular isp asumes a little freedom, he would not want to miss any packets and the boss agrees that monitoring UBL@aol.com is really importand..... Then some outbreak/exchange using investigator cant figure out what to make of the data he is presented with. Sure it goes to forensic experts first wich reasamble the packets into plain text e-mails (the ones the judge wanted) but they also had a really complicated looking story about this new "jabber" thingy.

      So the investigator who is no scully whatsoever asks some techs what it is all about, they agree that if the not-so-scully fbi agent mails the collected data they will run their l33t perl script to reasambe the jabber sesion packets in a plain text. They have been testing this quick perl hack for in office testing, their hobby is arp cache poisoning the office to monitor browsing habbits across the switch (they made their hobby their job, who wouldn`t want to do that) They figured it would be cool to see each others jabber sesion....

      Tech does de-jabber.pl tcpdumped.log|mail not-so-scully@exchange.somelittlebranchwithnomoney . bi.gov The not-so-scully investigator is disapointed, all the decoded jabber sesionS talk about is the newest britaney and eminem cd`s, so after saving the mail to c:\my documents the not-so-scully investigator goes to read his next mail which seams a lot more promising... it reads "I send you the file to have your advice"

      And now it turns out, mike the 18 year old kid who is really happy about his ubl@aol.com addres (cool, his friends always have a laugh about that) has been hanging around the mosque with his muslim friend becouse they trade the newest eminem en britany cd`s there, not 747 fligh manuals....

      Now this is scary *fiction* ofcourse, just like the whole sircam picking up fbi files and carnivore capturing the wrong mails things looked like a joke once to.

    12. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

      That means that in the labs, or on a few desks, there are fantastic machines. However all the agents, clerks, and reguler workers wind up with really crappy machines. Just because some people in the CIA have the tech, doesn't mean that they all have it.

    13. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "outdated" shit is Federal Gov't wide. It impacts ALL Federal levels especially defense. If you knew how messed up they were it would really frighten you. The biggest problem is NOT the hardware it's those supporting the hardware. There is a serious lack of computer skills on much higher levels than this agent wiping some email. There are people with big IT related titles that don't know how to configure a server, optimize performance or spec applications. They buy equipment at the last minute to spend the budget and it isn't thought out. There is little or no redundancy. Frequently backup is not part of the config. it later becomes a big fat "oh, no!" Servers go down and people don't know who to call. Let me see, duh, it's an IBM, wonder who I should call. There are programmers in the dark ages of computing. It's a mess! Many sectors of the Federal Gov rely on subcontractors and they are even worse! Very, very scary.

    14. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when did the NSA go on TV and say that, i've never heard the NSA say anything let alone that they are outdated. The CIA and FBI i would believe that from. As some movie said "the cia didnt know the berlin wall was falling until bricks started hitting them in the head"

      The CIA and FBI have always been second class agencies. Computers are not gonna counteract incomptetance

    15. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by vovin · · Score: 1

      NSA has their own fucking chip fab. They've purchased the most and largest supercomputers ever built. And their 'out dated'? What? That array of 4TB RAM cray's are starting feel sluggish? BTW my info is about 4 years old.
      Bottom line: NSA is ahead of the private sector.

      If the CIA starts a VC firm you can be sure there are agents on the take.

    16. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who modded this up as insightful?

      Remember, when Clinton entered office in 93, there WERE NO COMPUTERS in the White House! They still USED TELETYPES. In 93!

      This is so wrong, I must believe you have deliberately created this falsehood.

    17. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an ancient post by now, but I know for a fact that the Eff bee eye have bought ide hard drives from local vendors to the tune of gutting stock in a single day, so I would assume they are not as clued as in Joe Q .Public believes.

    18. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by delong · · Score: 2

      You can't expect me to take you seriously if you are that uninformed. The CIAs VC firm is common knowledge. Hell, even WIRED wrote about it.

      http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,39468, 00 . tml

      As to the NSA, don't take my word on it. Here's the damn Director of the NSA saying they're lagging behind the private sector:

      http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/go ve rnment/policy/story/0,10801,58331,00.html

      Really, don't you read?

      Derek

    19. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by delong · · Score: 2

      You're right. I looked it up to verify my memory, but I was mistaken. It was the phone system Clinton was bitching about. But the computer network in the WH in 93 was composed of an old mainframe and terminals. Not exactly cutting edge.

      Derek

    20. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by delong · · Score: 2

      As I said, on 60 Minutes.

      The DIRECTOR of the NSA, said so, to be exact.

      http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/go ve rnment/policy/story/0,10801,58331,00.html

      Derek

    21. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by delong · · Score: 2

      Besides, the black project places are working on equipment that makes the declassified stuff released to the public today look like Fisher Price kiddie toys.

      And you know this... how, exactly?

      The issue isn't whether the NSA has the machines to crunch the numbers to crack an encrypt scheme. Big deal. My desktop can do that, given enough time. The problem is in information analysis and communication systems. Sure the NSA collects terrabytes of data daily, but as the NSA itself has admitted, it simply can't make heads or tails of that data. Our intelligence agencies are great at collecting data, but are lost when it comes to PROCESSING that data into actionable and meaningful INFORMATION.

      Derek

    22. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by vovin · · Score: 1

      The NSA has a vested interest making un-true statements with regard their current level of technology. It is, in fact, their job to do so.

      The CIA is notorious for having rogue agents, and agents on the take. Just because they have a VC firm 'in the open' doesn't mean there are agents involved with the venture that are on the take. Combined with the fact that the are duplicating existing government give-aways, with the added benefit of a black (classified) budget, I see no reason to believe that even 50% of their investments are for legit tech.

      http://www.mediasnap.com/html/mercury.html
      BENS did not examine In-Q-Tel's financial controls, instead relying on an in-house CIA audit and another one done by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Any profits would be shared by In-Q-Tel and the CIA.

    23. Re:FBI's "outdated" computer systems? by delong · · Score: 2

      Huh?

      It is the NSA's job to collect data and analyze data. That's it. Not to go on 60 Minutes for disinformation prop.

      Notorious in spy novels. Really, lay off the fiction and conspiracy websites.

      Returning to the POINT, the CIA formed a VC firm to capture the dynamism of the private sector technology industry in developing tech. We'll leave off your (totally off point) speculations on what I'm not quite sure.

      Derek

  13. DCS-1000 by konichiwa · · Score: 0

    "Authorities have used Carnivore-type tools more than 25 times in all types of criminal cases, to catch fugitives, drug dealers, extortionists and suspected foreign intelligence agents. Carnivore is now called DCS-1000"

    Sweet! Sounds like the Super-Soaker I used to have!

    --
    Never argue with an idiot, he'll just lower you to his level and beat you with experience.
    1. Re:DCS-1000 by Tom+Finch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Could you use hexadecimal? That is, if you even know what hexadecimal is.

  14. Not Destroyed? by Myriad · · Score: 5, Funny
    A Justice Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Tuesday night that the e-mails were not destroyed.

    FBI Agent 1: We have a problem... Carnivore was doing its thing, but we got caught grabbing stuff we shouldn't!

    FBI Agent 2: Hmmm. I know! We claim that some lowly tech in a spat of moral outrage deletes ALL the material as he is so offended that it captured the, uhh, "non-target" mail, but we actually keep all the files and use them as we see fit.

    FBI Agent 1: Perfect!

    FBI Agent 2: (Takes long drag off cigarette)

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Not Destroyed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we HOPE that's only a joke.

    2. Re:Not Destroyed? by discogravy · · Score: 3, Funny

      is that post-coital cigarette? from screwing everyone all the time?

    3. Re:Not Destroyed? by Hard_Code · · Score: 1, Troll

      ...
      [Later that day]
      FBI Agent 2: here is the data you requested
      KGB Agent: Zank you very much Agent 2. *hands over one million dollars*
      FBI Agent 2: Ka-ching! Bring on the prostitutes!

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    4. Re:Not Destroyed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what this means, but I laughed like hell.

    5. Re:Not Destroyed? by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      I have no idea what this means, but I laughed like hell.
      *cough* Robert Hanssen *cough*

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  15. Hopefully by NickRob · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this sort of thing will get more press attention, that way more people see how evil Carnivore really is.

  16. one word:.... by Big+Stick · · Score: 1

    Good lord, haven't they ever heard of procmail:

    :0:
    * ^From:.+al-quaida.org
    terrorist

    Perhaps that's what all the open source debate at
    the Pentagon was really about.

  17. Related to recently found memo? by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this be something if the deleted email also just happened to contain additional FBI memos and/or information related to the pre-9/11 memo that has been circulating around the news.

    "Whoops. Sorry boss, but I destroyed that damning piece of evidence that links our field office to the overlooked memos regarding the WTC tragedy. I hope this doesn't get me in too much trouble...."

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  18. Apparently... by shlamo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The FBI deleted this poster's Spell/Grammar check as well. :/

  19. What's all the fuss about? by iritant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The guy goofed. What's nice to read is that he was upset about collecting information on innocent Americans, and that he deleted it. I would have been more upset if he did something with the information. Could you imagine the slashdot headline for *that*?

    1. Re:What's all the fuss about? by Radical+Rad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is nice to think that there is an FBI agent who believes in upholding the fourth amendment. It is too bad he is at the bottom of the totem pole instead of the top.

    2. Re:What's all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, huh... And of course you believe the information was actually deleted too? How much you want to bet an unofficial copy was made, and then publically deleted?

    3. Re:What's all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read a little closer - it's not a he, but a she.

    4. Re:What's all the fuss about? by JohnQPublic · · Score: 1

      The guy goofed. What's nice to read is that he was upset about collecting information on innocent Americans, and that he deleted it. I would have been more upset if he did something with the information.

      You should have read the entire article. It turns out that what the agent should have done, and should already have been trained to do was to preserve all the intercepted communications, suspend operations, and contact the appropriate authorities for review of the event. Instead, just like many criminals, he knowingly destroyed the evidence, thus impeding proper investigation and followup.

    5. Re:What's all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      luckily his supervisor was familiar with retrieving files from the recycle bin!

  20. Maybe they should rename it by Virtex · · Score: 5, Funny

    So Carnivore ate its own data? Maybe they should give it a new name. I think Cannibal would work pretty well.

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    1. Re:Maybe they should rename it by Spunk · · Score: 1

      No no no, Ouroboros, the snake that eats its own tail.

  21. Perhaps... by TibbonZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps this can be a fighting point for us against the carnavore. This proves that they are collecting the wrong stuff. I would have liked for them to find Bin Laden, and the FBI can go through my Akai mailing list and Spam that I recieve if that will catch him, because I don't really do anything personal that isn't encrypted heavily.

    I wonder if this will be the evidence that they need to make them stop using it.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Perhaps... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's good and all when you can trust the people that are doing this. But we have seen through history and in recent weeks (FBI agents indicted on Insider Trading) What's next? What if the FBI sold your information to a competitor company (like the CIA telling Boeing about a secret deal that Airbus, Boeing's competitor, was discussing with Saudi Arabia, allowing Boeing to beat their offer)

      But if you let them read your emails, you must surely be willing to allow them to listen to your phone calls. If that's the case, you must surely support the government putting camera's everwhere. Since, I mean, you have nothing to hide.

      See the problem is not that you don't have anything to hide, but the American system is based on freedom for all individuals. In that, everyone should be treated innocent until proven guilty. That's the basis of this entire system.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  22. Destroyed? by mrbuckles · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article actually says that the collected information was not destroyed -- citing an unnamed source. One would wonder with the backups a system like that would (should) have that destroying the evidence would be a lengthy job and may not have been done completely.

    The article also notes people who have had their e-mail unintentionally collected are entitled to be informed. Can't wait to see if that happens...

    1. Re:Destroyed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.
      There would have been a purge of the stuff they grabbed by mistake.. and they have to do this anyway to make room for the new stuff. Their only loss of credibilty, is that they are so dense as to believe email is being used, rather than letter on horseback or ute, which is the more likely scenario. So why are we spending money on something that wont make one iota of difference.

    2. Re:Destroyed? by cebe · · Score: 3

      I think what that anonymous source meant was that the tech *thought* he destroyed them.

      "The FBI technical person was apparently so upset that he destroyed all the e-mail take, including the take on" the suspect, the memo said.
      A Justice Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Tuesday night that the e-mails were not destroyed.

      Ya'll would be surprised what forensics software can do. I've worked with it at the government level. I think what the anon source was getting at is that they have recovered the "destroyed" data.
      It is almost impossible to destroy data. You pretty much have to run over your hdd with your car. Anyone that thinks otherwise is fooling themselves. The forensics software that governments are using is unbelievable. Deleted, Formatted 8 times and written over 20 times? no problem. You're damn right that destroying the data would be a lengthy job. You have to light the fire that will burn the hdd after all. :)

      --
      You have paid for a total of 0 pages and so far 0 have been used up (0 today).
    3. Re:Destroyed? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Deleted, Formatted 8 times and written over 20 times? no problem. You're damn right that destroying the data would be a lengthy job.

      If data is so resilient then I'd like to know why I can't just load up a program to triple my harddrive space with no compression.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    4. Re:Destroyed? by zeno_2 · · Score: 2, Informative
      If data is so resilient then I'd like to know why I can't just load up a program to triple my harddrive space with no compression.

      Your hard drive also does not consist of a clean room with technicians in a bunny suit (think intel) taking apart your hard drive to read the data on the drive =)

    5. Re:Destroyed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another point, in addition to the other responder, is that hard drive capacity keeps on increasing because there are gaps between where the head reads and writes. It's these gaps where the data doesn't get wiped as well, and has ghost images. Writing and wiping several times will often clear any chance of data retrieval, but i've heard there are techniques that can look at the write/clears in layers (not perfectly mind you), so you have to do it a lot.

  23. Freedom thru massive screw-ups! by chriso11 · · Score: 1

    I wonder just how much data they captured.

    Of course, if they *really* wanted to, they could do forensics on the drives and reclaim the data. I bet my Amazon order for "Learn Arabic in 48hours" is probably one of the captured transactions:

    Lesson 1:
    Translate:
    "The tightness of the restraints will negate the need for you to slit my throat"

    --
    No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
  24. I seem to remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Multiple posts on this web site pre 9/11 advocating "anti-Carnivore" behavior along the lines of adding obvious trigger phrases to the end of email, online posts, etc... to overload the system... Great job guys, you bunch of pathetic losers more concerned about trading "15 minutes of fame bands" music, pron, etc...

    1. Re:I seem to remember... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm confused. Your point is that /. users would add 'terrorist-like' tags to the end of thier emails to over fill a parser device that saved all suspect email. Your trying to say that because some people might have done this it's the faults of lamers who trade p0rn?

      I don't think this argument can hold any weight. I honestly think that the majority of /. readers do *not* trade files, or engage in warez activity. IRC is the forum for those clowns, slashdot has a fairly high level of 19-28yr. old people in the IT/tech industry, with another segment of 'nerdy' teenagers who are fairly clean. I'm not going to deny that there are some lamers here, but the general populus they are not.

      Before 9/11 carnivore was such an absurd system that it was absurdity. I do not agree to any form of blanket-wiretap, if such a tap existed, I would have my telephone lines encrypted. I do not have anything to hide, BUT they do not have any reason to know that. I severly doubt that anyone who has any respect in this world would dare to put terrorist-like messages in thier emails post 9/11, it's simply not kosher in this era of post-crisis nationalism.

      I would guess that carnivore instead accidently collected *all* emails/communications that passed through it, weither they were the target or not. This was not the intended behavor, so they made a big deal about it and tried to cover it up. Typical behavior (I'm not for/against it, I'm just stating this is likley what happeend).

      I have no objection to the type of wiretap they imposed against mafiaboy (he could only get one of a set of ip's, they tapped his phone line, very specific packet sniffing), I am against this sort of blanket 'big brother is watching' actions.

      Before you reply, I'd like to make it very clear, I am 100% for selective wiretaps with a judges approval. I am not for the ability to bypass the judge, and I am not in any way supportive of the police acting in thier own authority when it comes to extended spying.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    2. Re:I seem to remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I would guess that carnivore...

      Makes your self-rightous post all the more crediable...

    3. Re:I seem to remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a point?

      Apparently not.

  25. Must be the e-mail virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should not have collected spam using M$ Outlook. Hey, maybe FBI even deleted some of the M$ antitrust evidence and the judges ruled M$ innocent because of it, all thanks to the Carnivore.

  26. amazing isnt it... by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

    how they keep screwing up trying to get this guy.
    its almost like they need him to be a mystery and be alive so they can blame him for things...

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Possible Headline: Kathleen Fent, Do NOT Read... by Ieshan · · Score: 1, Funny

    Possible Headline:

    Kathleen Fent, do NOT read this story
    from the oh-no-our-porn-tapes-are-public-domain dept.
    Posted by CmdrTaco

  29. I have but one question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED!!!!

  30. This just in..... by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    FBI now says they have opened an office on the North Pole. No word on why an agent volunteered for it.

    --


    My sig of choice is Marlboro
    1. Re:This just in..... by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Jesus, an agent screwed up....new office on the north pole....get it? The moderation here never ceases to amaze me.

      --


      My sig of choice is Marlboro
  31. Not funny. by ZaBu911 · · Score: 0, Troll

    -- Not a troll --

    FBI Agents work harder than you think. Making fun of them on this huge website is just disrupting them from the important work they do. It's sort of a chain reaction

    1. Re:Not funny. by cduffy · · Score: 2

      Unless you honestly believe that being made fun of on some website reduces peoples' ability to do work, that *is* a troll.

      Consider: If being made fun of online made folks unable to get stuff done, Microsoft's release schedules would slip by years!

      Oh, wait...

    2. Re:Not funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- Not a troll --

      Bite me.

    3. Re:Not funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are only aiding the terrorists!

      Pathetic.

    4. Re:Not funny. by beertopia · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a chain reaction, because every time you make fun of them on a website, they have to stop fighting terrorism for long enough to get a Carnivore warrant to investigate you, right? Fortunately, they'll probably lose the evidence anyway.

      At least, I hope so, now...

      --
      -- 'intellectual property' is oxymoronic
    5. Re:Not funny. by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      I know for certain FBI works harder than most think. In fact I have two relatives, one Special Agent and another a programmer, who retired after many years of service only a couple years ago.

      What would their reaction be to the funny post?
      They'd probably both have a good laugh at it even if they were still in the FBI.

  32. bin Laden's ancestory by whovian · · Score: 2, Funny

    An Anonymous Coward writes: "The FBI apparently used Carivore in an attempt to collect information on Osama bin Laden't network.

    Gee, I didn't know Osama was dutch.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    1. Re:bin Laden's ancestory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's O Bin Wankanobi whose followers beleive they can still hear him despite him being killed during a terrorist attack.

  33. Carnivore? What's Carnivore? by Aexia · · Score: 2

    We only have a surveillance device known as DCS-1000. You civil libertarians are so paranoid. Sheesh.

    1. Re:Carnivore? What's Carnivore? by wadetemp · · Score: 2

      Not to be off topic and totally boneheaded, but I'll go ahead and throw caution to the wind: the slashdot math you refer to is actually correct if you hit the karma cap. For instance, your 50 + 5 -3 = 49 could have gone this way:

      +1 Funny: 50 + 1 = 50

      +1 Funny: 50 + 1 = 50

      +1 Funny: 50 + 1 = 50

      -1 Ovrrt: 50 - 1 = 49

      -1 Overt: 49 - 1 = 48

      -1 Overt: 48 - 1 = 47

      +1 Funny: 47 + 1 = 48

      +1 Funny: 48 + 1 = 49

      And there you have it. Who cares anyway... and if you do care, and your posts are good, you'll be banging your head on the ceiling again in no time. :)

  34. hmmm by drDugan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll bet I know how they figured out there was a problem:

    [modal window]
    Drive C:/ is Full.
    [/modal window]

    followed quickly with a blue screen of death.

    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think you'd feel silly if you found out it actually runs on Linux?

    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the CIO of the FBI took the RHCE exams with me. His name is Eric Benladenstein.

      You prolly know him if you've been to downtown boston. His dad sells hotdogs at the
      red sox stadium, and his older brother used to be a cabbie, but now he is a pilot under
      training for the air-force.

      Yeah, good man too.

    3. Re:hmmm by karlm · · Score: 3, Informative
      Do you think you'd feel silly if you found out it actually runs on Linux?

      At least as of last year, Carnivore/DCS-1000 ran on NT 4.0 (not sure which service pack). Yeah, the poster prbably would be a little embarassed if s/he discovered Carnivore was deployed on Linux, but the poster need not worry. Most people arround here know that Carnivore runson NT 4. That's part of a lot of people's concerns. I'd feel much better if my government used more robust means to collect evidence. If someone cracks a Carnivore box, it comes with nice GUI tools to facilitate blackmail and information theft.

      The FBI comes in with the box and hooks it up to the same LAN as the mail server to be monitored. I think it sniffs traffic instead of passing all of the traffic in one NIC and out another.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  35. When it doesn't pay to be the tech guy! by Bobzibub · · Score: 2, Funny

    #hmmm.. wots up with these warnings?

    df -k
    /dev/hde2 10 000 000 9 900 000 99% \
    /mnt/Carnavor data

    #Oh crap! All those emails! This is TOTALLY\
    illegal!! I'd better restart that piece of crap..

    /etc/rc.d/init.d/munch stop
    vi /etc/munch.etc
    rm -Rf /mnt/munchData/*
    /etc/rc.d/init.d/munch start

    #whew. Legit again. I'm TOTALLY awsome!

    1. Re:When it doesn't pay to be the tech guy! by Bobzibub · · Score: 2

      /mnt/munchData --- /mnt/Carnavor data ... you get the idea... : )
      -b

    2. Re:When it doesn't pay to be the tech guy! by blue+trane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so the privacy issue of the government reading all our emails is completely superseded by the terrorism threat?

      is that a foregone conclusion now?

    3. Re:When it doesn't pay to be the tech guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

      now shut up

    4. Re:When it doesn't pay to be the tech guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get the idea

      yeah, but explain it to the shell :)

    5. Re:When it doesn't pay to be the tech guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >so the privacy issue of the government reading
      >all our emails is completely superseded by the
      >terrorism threat?

      For the moment, but, time heals all wounds.

      After a few years of "them" not dropping buildings, anthraxing towns, or suitcase nuking,
      we will go back to business as usual.

    6. Re:When it doesn't pay to be the tech guy! by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      My theory:

      It would be simpler (quicker, less stressful, less expensive...) to deal with why terrorists start to want to suicide bomb in the first place.

      I know that I feel inequalities and injustice in our society, and I would like society to deal with my complaints in a constructive, how-can-we-best-fix-this manner.

      Personally I think the people in charge are more interested in the beating-the-chest, pissing contest aspects of the game of war than in really doing what is best for the greatest number of people.

      Of course our leaders' power comes from us, the people.

      If we really wanted to deal with terrorism effectively, some leader-type would pick up on it and gain popular support.

      </dream type="idealistic">

  36. Re:Holy shit! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    You got the point!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  37. Forensic Data Recovery by darthBear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Assuming that the emails really were deleted and all the backups were also cleared out, what is to stop them from recovering the data using their forensic data recovery techniques. Comerical teams are amazing at this and I would have to assume the FBI is at least as good. How lost is this data really?

  38. I wonder how important this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As much as I've been following the War on Terrorism, I'm not sure how high this registers on the Need-To-Coverup basis. I suppose we'll find out if/when the Pentagon issues another Emergency Alert to distract the public from how bad an issue it is...

    Seriously, it's a pattern. The U.S. just took out a village by accident? Probably didn't hear much about it because everybody's talking about Tora Bora (ever wonder how everybody knows about that location and yet nobody knows what's been accomplished there?) The U.S. bombs 4 Canadians into smithereens? Two days later, a 13-state warning is issued saying that banking outlets are targetted. (Of course, Ashcroft denies that people should avoid banking that day...) Bush actually had information on the attacks before Sept 11th? Whoops, can't talk about that now, because the BIGGEST TERRORIST WARNING EVER where this time they're targeting the STATUE OF LIBERTY!!!!!

    Last time I saw, Statue of Liberty's still standing. But that's okay. It makes me feel better knowing that whenever we start thinking for ourselves, the Pentagon's there to put everything back into perspective...

    Got war?

    1. Re:I wonder how important this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ya on the local news it was a sickening picture for memorial day weekend. Governor Pataki is smiling bragging about how effective the facial recongnition technology is. "See i just walked by this spot at normal pace and it took 10 pictures of me from different angles and made a 3d model of my face!" Yay bravo... What a place to introduce this technology. Debuting this technology at the statue of liberty is rather like a slap in the face.

    2. Re:I wonder how important this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admit the whole thing about the president knowing about it was total crap tho. It still pisses me off that it ever came up- who CARES. Its over, and there was little to be done. They never pointed out that these memos are likely arriving nearly daily pointing out potential attacks, and its simply impossible to take every one of them completly seriously. Who would have thought they could really hijack several planes and fly them into buildings? Its much more likely for carbombs to be placed in public places, etc.

      If you ask me, it was just the media needing somthing to gloat over for a while because nothing else was happening and 9/11 still (somehow) gives good ratings.

    3. Re:I wonder how important this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot. First of all the Pentagon does not issue any warnings, that is done by Homeland Defense and the FBI. Bush did not have the info before Sept 11. You should stop watching the news and move your conspiracy theory ass to Pakistan. IDIOT.

  39. Shocking news. In other developments levy killed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have thunk it? Levy was killed? I'm wondering how her body wound up there, random case of soul escaping body? Unbelieveable the shit you see in the news.

  40. [OT] Why did you su? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't have to su for deleting some stuff inside your own home directory.

    (Unless the files weren't yours, of course.)

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:[OT] Why did you su? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably one of those IP lawyer types....

  41. Destroy by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    I'm certain that "destroyed" in this case means they threw it in the "nuker" (big magnetic device) and therefore data recovery is impossible.

  42. Attention Taco! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your search engine is NOT working!

  43. Carnivore v.05a by symbolic · · Score: 2


    One would think that they'd have tested the software BEFORE it was installed. That is how it's supposed be done, right?

    1. Re:Carnivore v.05a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One would think that they'd have tested the software BEFORE it was installed. That is how it's supposed be done, right?

      Just like Windows, right?

    2. Re:Carnivore v.05a by nedwidek · · Score: 1

      Developer: It compiles.
      Manager: Ship it!

      --
      Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
  44. finally by tps12 · · Score: 1

    It looks like Carnivore has finally proven to be worth it.

    Don't get me wrong, I was right there with every other slashbot. "Abridgement of libery!" I cried, and more besides.

    But that freedom isn't worth a dime in today's world without the security to keep it.

    Something to consider.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      But that security isn't worth a dime in today's world without the freedom to keep it.

      something more important to consider.

    2. Re:finally by Fixer · · Score: 1
      Steaming hot bovine excrement!

      If you trade one for the other, you get neither. If you have to violate the Constitution in order to save it, then we might as well tear the thing up, because it has all been in vain.

      --
      "Avast! Prepare for the rodgering!" THWACK! "Arrr.. me nards.."
  45. Now, I'm not being paranoid.... by ZaBu911 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Could this be a cover up?
    Hell, what if they found some evidence that they would be liable to show the American people, and the American people would not be happy to see?

    Just a though!

    -NOT INTENDED AS A TROLL. IF YOU THINK I'M JUST BEING IMMATURE AND FLAMING, DO THE MATURE THING AND IGNORE ME-

  46. BBC, the mis-leader of the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you guys know BBC is sometimes telling a lie to us?
    Here we have an example.
    One day, I read this article on BBC web site. This gif file is taken from the cached html file.
    On the same day, I saw the the same article. To my surprise, it was modified!
    Please compare the numbers of the vote on whaling.
    "No" suddenly became large and "Yes" became small... even smaller than before!

    1. Re:BBC, the mis-leader of the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a JPEG, fuckwit.

  47. Sense of Humor deprived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you Really think that the reason that the guy included the sig is because he can't understand the methodology?

    Or might it be because he does not agree with it?
    Make a wild guess....

    1. Re:Sense of Humor deprived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Rather than bitch about, I just create a new ID every time I hit 50. Someday, I'm going to blow them all on one orgasmic trolling spree.

      ~~~

    2. Re:Sense of Humor deprived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if trolling does it for ya, go for it. Just remember to use protection. Rubber keyboard covers are cheap these days.

    3. Re:Sense of Humor deprived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sell them on ebay!

    4. Re:Sense of Humor deprived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mr. Horse: No sir... I don't believe I need any rubber keyboard covers... But would you happen to have any Rubber Walrus Protectors?

      Mr. Walrus: Call the police...

      Goddamn! Ren and Stimpy were the shit...

  48. Re:Possible Headline: Kathleen Fent, Do NOT Read.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scariest horror film ever!

  49. Anonymous Coward by bstadil · · Score: 2

    I wonder why the person that submitted this chose to do this as "Anonymous Coward"
    ;-)

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  50. damn your good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remind me not to post replies to trolls from now on

    though I must say I am impressed by your speed, you will probably get my post moded down rather quickly with that little plug

  51. The author of "Carnivore"... by newerbob · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... Patrick Naughton is a complete IDIOT. (Another reference to his work is here


    I was forced to work for this pervert for a few months . Everyone knew he was bad news, even before he entered a guilty plea for possession of child pornography including photos of infants.


    Why are we letting pedophiles write software to catch criminals?


    This guy is NO GENIUS! After all, he thought there really were young girls in an IRC chat room called "Dads & Daughters Sex" and he got caught!


    Patrick was supposed to be an Internet Expert, yet he didn't even PGP his kiddie porn!


    The Walt Disney Company lost $1Billion dollars investing in Patrick Naughton's company (his college roommate and best friend still works for Disney!). Now the FBI lost hard-earned evidence investing in Naughton's technology.


    -Disney paid the price for Naughton's stupidity.


    The FBI paid the price for Naughton's stupidity.


    And THE AMERICAN PUBLIC did, too! By standing still while "pretty boy" Patrick was able to plea bargain by writing crappy software for the FBI, he got out of jail sooner and he's free to endanger more young girls, maybe even your son or daughter!

    --

    --
    Ask the Ya-Hoot Oracle Anything!
    1. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by newerbob · · Score: 1
      Why was this modded down? There was absolutely nothing flame-baity about it at all.

      --

      --
      Ask the Ya-Hoot Oracle Anything!
    2. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was modded down by a pedophile who doesn't want the truth to be known about the author of Carnivore!

    3. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by newerbob · · Score: 1
      Well, maybe you have a point there!

      The posting contained factual information, and links to reputable sources about the convicted felon who wrote "Carnivore" for the FBI.

      If you read the original post, you'll see that the FBI chose a not-to-smart on-line sex predator (after all, he got caught!) to write their snooping software.

      --

      --
      Ask the Ya-Hoot Oracle Anything!
    4. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by newerbob · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here are some more links to Naughton's plea-bargain with the FBI (writing software in exchange for freedom): here

      here it says he's "helping law enforcement track down pedophiles

      and here it says that the FBI's deal to have him write snoop software saved him from jail.

      --

      --
      Ask the Ya-Hoot Oracle Anything!
    5. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could people call NBC and bug them to cover this aspect of the story? I think it's a pretty compelling point, don't you?

      kersmonk

    6. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by ryants · · Score: 0
      and he's free to endanger more young girls, maybe even your son or daughter!
      Uhm... my son isn't a young girl. How about yours?
      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    7. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by peddrenth · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why carnivore needs access to so much data... "one copy for me, one copy for you" each time it comes across kiddie-porn on a suspect's data connection...

    8. Re:The author of "Carnivore"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why are people marking this FACTUAL ACCOUNT as flamebait?

      They must be pedophiles, too!

  52. Jeffersonians vs. Hamiltonians by GMontag · · Score: 2

    Well, we Jeffersonians are not suprized a bit. Nor are we suprized that the Hamiltonians are suprized either LOL!

    Wooly Mammoths and Sally Hemmings indeed!

  53. Totally off topic, but... by zaren · · Score: 1

    thehungersite is back up? Cool! I hit that site every day for the longest time before it died. Thanks for posting that :)

    -----
    Apple hardware still too expensive for you? How about a raffle ticket?

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:Totally off topic, but... by ParticleGirl · · Score: 2

      Sure thing-- the hungersite has been back up for a few months now. Another good one is Stop the Hunger ...I hit them both every day.

      --
      Do something about world hunger. Click here
  54. The Truth? by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2

    You can't handle the TRUTH!

    They were using the GXP series harddisks for more than 8 hours at a time!

    Peace. Love. Linux. Head Crash.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  55. "she" not "he" by benh57 · · Score: 1

    If you actually read the article. :) You will learn that contrary to the /. header, the tech was a "she".

    1. Re:"she" not "he" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh now it makes more sense, dumb bitch

    2. Re:"she" not "he" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that explains the "so upset" part.

      So much for ever having a woman president, huh?

    3. Re:"she" not "he" by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      You will learn that contrary to the /. header, the tech was a "she"

      Women and their PMS problems.

  56. Re:Shocking news. In other developments levy kille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Next thing ya' know, they'll hit us with the zinger that Condit might have had her offed. The surprises never end!

    ~~~

  57. All I have to say is.... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    someone with that sort of spirit should be promoted!

  58. Non-covered targets should assist the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you aren't a target of the FBI, you should avoid frustrating FBI techs by transfering email with a STARTTLS enabled SMTP client/daemon and/or using OpenPGP. Everyone should due their part to fight terrorism and if all non-covered targets used the correct tools then the FBI would not have to worry about collecting information from non-covered targets.

  59. Bad ideas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I had briefly considered designing a counterstrike map. Thought I'd do it' very realistically mapped to a major city. Then thought of targets and realized that if I did this, I'd probably have the FBI beating down my back door. So I just went back to playing maps rather than designing them :)

  60. The problem in a nutshell: by acceleriter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "computer forensic technician" often equals "ex-cop who 'learned computers'"

    Not to bash law enforcement, but those among them who aren't completely ignorant of technology often know just enough to be dangerous.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  61. But we gave them lots of money... by smack_attack · · Score: 1

    We gave these guys ~$122B to fight cyberterrorism and what do we get? Pure and utter incompetence.

    Oh, I see... they just need more money. When the fuck did this country become so unwilling to take responsibility for our fuckups? I forgot, no one can be responsible because that means our government can't and won't protect us. But we should still give them gobs of money so that they can inform us how we might possibly die instead of doing anything to prevent it.
    /angry libertarian rant

  62. Upset Agent by Roarkk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The best part of this article is the fact that an FBI agent was upset at collecting email that wasn't supposed to be collected.

    Whether they have backups, whether they collected the information or not, it points out the fact that individuals in the FBI are concerned about privacy issues as much as many of us are.

    1. Re:Upset Agent by vidarh · · Score: 2
      Or he was just concerned about what would happen to the carnivore program if anyone outside the buerau would find out (such as if any of the mails saved by mistake where submitted to a court together with the rest), or he just realized that they didn't need the mistakenly saved e-mails and was just going to delete them to avoid cluttering up the system. Etc. etc.

      You have no basis to say that the FBI agent actually upset - it's not a fact, it is a claim that's been through multiple steps of obfuscation already. You also have no basis to say that if he was upset that is was because he was concerned about privacy issues and not something else (like the possibility of losing his job if something went wrong).

      To be really cynical and paranoid: This could have been done on purpose to be used as an argument for allowing Carnivore: "But look, when we did a mistake we deleted ALL the mail, even legitimately intercepted ones just to be sure we didn't violate anyones privacy". Is that likely? Perhaps not, but it's possible, and the article simply isn't enough to rule it out completely.

  63. i know i'm gonna get the flame but... by bluecalix · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can't believe that none of you will face the fact that some slashdot-reading, EFF wannabe just fucked up big in a fit of reactionary rage and might just possiblly cost lives. Granted that is a stretch, but at the very least, work has been lost and time (that could be better spent) will have to be wasted on it.

    --
    e x p e c t d e l a y . c o m
    1. Re:i know i'm gonna get the flame but... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      if the police break into my house randomly w/o my consent to enter and see the materials for me to murder my neighbor, they can't arrest me.

      If the police wiretap me randomly w/o my permission to be doing so, they can't arrest me.

      If they have a warrant to do either, they can.

      See how it didn't cost anyone any lives?

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  64. K, explain how I can feel safe now: by Romancer · · Score: 2

    "The FBI technical person was apparently so upset
    that he destroyed all the e-mail take, including the take on" the suspect, the memo said.

    temper temper FBI Guy.


    The Justice Department's Office of Intelligence and Policy Review was furious after learning the evidence captured by the e-mail wiretap system was destroyed because of the glitch, the memo states.

    temper temper Justice Dept.


    Henry Perritt, who led a team authorized by the FBI to review the surveillance system, said he was surprised the technician deleted the e-mails.

    Wha? something wrong in the "system"?!


    "The collection is supposed to be retained for judicial review," Perritt said. "If an agent simply deleted a whole bunch of files without the court instructing, that's not the way it's supposed to work."

    Really? didn't these guys assure us that everything works fine with carnivore? And that we could trust them not to use it improperly?

    Now we have hothead FBI techies misdeploying a software package that has the potential to break the laws they are trying to enforce with the help of the "furious" Dept. of Justice to oversee their work?

    Somehow I get the feeling I'm gonna be watched by mad men.


    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. Washington Post Story Too by aengblom · · Score: 2

    The Washington Post's got a story up too: Article

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  67. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia joined NATO

  68. I wonder how effective it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, I'd imagine that bin Laden's cronies are pretty damned stupid. Yes, they've hit the WTC, and if you believe bin Laden's videos (As seen on CNN!), they were responsible for the USS Cole and others.

    But all the things I've seen and read point to the fact that, they really just got pretty damned lucky. There were signs of impending doom(tm) all around, but no one pieced them together in time. (To think that they weren't watching is idiocy - you never hear about the threats the FBI/CIA/etc. stop, eh?)

    Really, would bin Laden and company be smart enough to be using encryption/etc.? Perhaps he and his top staff are, but I can't see the average rank and file terrorist is. The fact that the FBI obviously did get info from e-mail means either they can crack encryption of a certain strength (possible) or that our neighborhood AK-toting dolts aren't using it (more likely).

    That aside, I wonder how much spam Carnivore picks up. *snicker* My inbox fills up rapidly with Free Inkjet this and Hot Live Chicks that.

    Maybe the agent in question wasn't angered at invasion of privacy. The agent probably went mad after trying out a pyramid scheme that didn't work. :P

  69. A violation of federal wiretap law? by Radical+Rad · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The surveillance system captured not only the electronic communications of the court-authorized target, "but also picked up E-Mails on non-covered" individuals, a violation of federal wiretap law.

    Amendment IV of the U.S. Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Notice that the Constitution does not say that illegal searches may be performed as long as any resulting evidence is not used against the persons being illegally searched. It says that it shall not happen. This interception of mail was not just a violation of federal wiretap law, it was a violation of the Bill of Rights. We are supposedly fighting a "war on terrorism" to protect our way of life, but that way of life is rooted in our Constitution. The only way to win the hearts and minds of the rest of the world is to stick to our principles and abide by the highest law of the land which is the U.S. Constitution.

    1. Re:A violation of federal wiretap law? by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 0

      a
      ?Béze, I really sincerely do, but do you actually think our government follows the mandates of the Constitution? The Constitution is only thought of when it is politically expedient. After all, the Patriot Act allows for indiscriminate wiretaps and many other activities that totally decimate our Constitutional protections. Tyranny is not far from each of our homes, trust me.

      --
      Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
    2. Re:A violation of federal wiretap law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way to win the hearts and minds of the rest of the world is to stick to our principles and abide by the highest law of the land which is the U.S. Constitution.

      #1 - We won't win their hearts and minds.

      #2 - Principles don't mean shit if you lose. Playing by our own rules is tantamount to fighting with one hand tied behind our back. Definitely not advisable when our opponent has both hands free and has shown a propensity for kicking us in the balls. If we are going to fight against terrorists and win we will wind up having to take some actions that most Americans (and I categorically DO NOT include my self among them) would find fairly repugnant.

    3. Re:A violation of federal wiretap law? by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2
      Notice that the Constitution does not say that illegal searches may be performed as long as any resulting evidence is not used against the persons being illegally searched. It says that it shall not happen.


      The first issue, of course, is whether the searches in question were actually illegal. That in turn hinges on whether or not the searches are, in the words of the 4th, "unreasonable".

      I'm not claiming that it's a good idea or that the gov't is necessarility justified in what they did, but the fact that you find it distasteful does not necessarily make it unconstitutional or illegal.
    4. Re:A violation of federal wiretap law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who what and why are we fighting again.

    5. Re:A violation of federal wiretap law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you arguing intercepting communications without a warrant is "reasonable" under any constitutional interpretation?

    6. Re:A violation of federal wiretap law? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      performing a search that comes up with a bunch of other peoples email is definately unreasonable.

      Besides, what is to really stop them from looking in the other emails and seeing something possibly incriminating?

      Suppose I was talking to my friend about my new AK/47, and (joking around) started talking about modifying the chamber and the firing pin, and making a new threaded end to fit my custom-made silencer?

      Don't think it wouldn't happen. I for one have done such emails, JOKING around. However, as with most conversation, most humour is tongue-in-cheek and only really "gotten" between two people who know each other. The rest would think you're going to go into some bell tower and start picking people off. (with an AK-47 LOL.. right.. nice sniper gun. see? humour that only people who know would get)

      Uhmm.. I have to go, theres some black cars driving up...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  70. Article: Why You Should Use Encryption by goingware · · Score: 2
    If you aren't concerned that others may be reading may email, please take a moment to read my article:

    You would be suprised how easy it is to get access to the data you transmit over the Internet, and how many people are in a position to easily access it.

    When you're done with that, consider also reading Is This the America I Love?

    Thank you for your attention.

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  71. Once upon a time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    there was a giant carnivore, named Carni, which could eat tons and tons of terrorist email. The FBI promised the American citizens that they would be safe from the beast because terrorist email is like meat, and carnivores eat meat.

    But, one day, the hideous creature was very, very hungry and ate some green leafy stuff. This made Carni very happy, for in reality he wasn't merely a carnivore, he was an omnivore. "It's all good" he thought as he merrily munched away, one megabite after another.

    After the creature had gorged himself on the newly discovered delicacy, a cagesweeper (fbi agent) noticed that Carny looked bloated. The concerned agent looked into the throat of the monster and saw what had happened. "Spit it out", he screamed. "rm this", "rm that", "rm some more". "It's no use, there's too much in there". "rm -rf * #take that you bastard".

    The final incantation did the trick, now Carni had plenty of room for more meat. Unfortunately, the poor cagesweeper found himself buried in a mountain of shit.

    The moral of the story? There are no morals. This is the FBI.

    1. Re:Once upon a time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. Motherf**cker you only got a one. This place
      stinks like a yeast infection.

  72. Anyone have Colleen Rowley's Email Address? by goingware · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If anyone knows how to email Colleen Rowley (the FBI agent who wrote the letter whose URL appears above), please send her the following URL:

    Make a Bonfire of Your Reputations
    http://www.goingware.com/reputation/

    What the heck, I'll just post the speech here, it's not that long:

    When I was asked to make this address I wondered what I had to say to you boys who are graduating. And I think I have one thing to say. If you wish to be useful, never take a course that will silence you. Refuse to learn anything that implies collusion, whether it be a clerkship or a curacy, a legal fee or a post in a university. Retain the power of speech no matter what other power you may lose. If you can take this course, and in so far as you take it, you will bless this country. In so far as you depart from this course, you become dampers, mutes, and hooded executioners.

    As a practical matter, a mere failure to speak out upon occassions where no statement is asked or expect from you, and when the utterance of an uncalled for suspicion is odious, will often hold you to a concurrence in palpable iniquity. Try to raise a voice that will be heard from here to Albany and watch what comes forward to shut off the sound. It is not a German sergeant, nor a Russian officer of the precinct. It is a note from a friend of your father's, offering you a place at his office. This is your warning from the secret police. Why, if you any of young gentleman have a mind to make himself heard a mile off, you must make a bonfire of your reputations, and a close enemy of most men who would wish you well.

    I have seen ten years of young men who rush out into the world with their messages, and when they find how deaf the world is, they think they must save their strength and wait. They believe that after a while they will be able to get up on some little eminence from which they can make themselves heard. "In a few years," reasons one of them, "I shall have gained a standing, and then I shall use my powers for good." Next year comes and with it a strange discovery. The man has lost his horizon of thought, his ambition has evaporated; he has nothing to say. I give you this one rule of conduct. Do what you will, but speak out always. Be shunned, be hated, be ridiculed, be scared, be in doubt, but don't be gagged. The time of trial is always. Now is the appointed time.

    John J. Chapman
    Commencement Address to the Graduating Class of Hobart College, 1900

    I found Chapman's speech quoted in the printed edition of The Cluetrain Manifesto, and from the moment I read it, I was unable to rest until I had up on my website at the above URL.

    It's not easy to speak out about what you believe in, but if more people did, the world would be a better place.

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  73. hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is far fetched but I was starting to wonder why I am on 3 mailing lists and normally get 15 e-mails a day and all of a sudden went down to 1 e-mail every 3 days. hmmmm

  74. All your files are belong to nobody by abe_is_fun · · Score: 1

    I worked with a guy who was "let go" from the company, and the boss wanted to give his computer to somebody else. However, being a smart PHB-type boss he also wanted a copy of some relatively important code and docs that were kept on the computer.

    So the boss asked a jr. lan admin to "ghost" the computer -- but of course the lan admin ghosted a fresh build over top of the existing one... The admin got the beats for it, even though it was an honest mistake. I can easily see how someone could delete something important by accident.

    Anyway, can't the gubment guys just use their special sticky tape to pull out all the deleted 0s and 1s? I thought you had to really work at it to fully and completely delete data.

    --
    I don't want to be here.
    1. Re:All your files are belong to nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of that "look at kiddie porn once and it stays on your hard drive forever" is a bunch of hogwash. High-level formatting and normal file deleting can be easily recovered, especially if the OS on the drive was MS Windows. Zero-fill utilities and low-level formatting will make the data unrecoverable, however; no matter what computer forensic people do to it.

  75. Drudge report... by antirename · · Score: 1

    or slashdot? I know, I'm killing karma here, but nothing new here. Big brother is watching, maybe... possibly. If they are that agent's career is fucked. New sig: so it goes

  76. An EDITED version by smiff · · Score: 1
    An edited version of the agent's 13-page letter

    Gotta make sure they can claim copyright. AOL/Time-Warner wouldn't want someone else to benefit from their expensive writing talent.

  77. Oh, come on! This is FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this up people...

  78. recovery by no+reply · · Score: 1

    i would think that if the files were that important they could be retrieved, if it was ever written to disk. maybe even reconstruct the link light activity... :P

  79. I smell bacon!! by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    And that's why nobody knows what happened to Elvis... Who killed Marylin Monroe or how many Gunmen it took to kill JFK... Damn accidental Carnivore email dumps! We can blame everything on it now!

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  80. Terror Wars by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny
    Princess FBI: These privacy advocate terrorists are destroying us. This is our most despirate hour. Help me OsamaBin Ladoni, you're my only hope.

    There, OsamaBin Ladoni wields the Death Jet, a Jet with the power to destroy an entire building.

    Will OsamaBin be able to rescue the FBI from the clutches of those Terrorist Privacy Advocate Infidels?!?!? Will Saddam learn that yuppie ex-president Ronald Reagan is his father? Will Arafat appear on the show Friends as rumored? Stay tuned.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Terror Wars by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      There, OsamaBin Ladoni wields the Death Jet, a Jet with the power to destroy an entire building.

      I wonder how "funny" this is to the survivors of September 11th.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:Terror Wars by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      There, OsamaBin Ladoni wields the Death Jet, a Jet with the power to destroy an entire building.

      I wonder how "funny" this is to the survivors of September 11th.


      I don't think you need to worry much, they won't read it. I hear they are at the bank now.. probably laughing the whole way.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    3. Re:Terror Wars by Vikki_R. · · Score: 1
      I wonder how "funny" this is to the survivors of September 11th.

      True. But maybe that's why it only has "Score: 3, Funny" instead of score 4 or 5.

      But, then again, humour is subjective.

      That's just my $.02 USD. *shrug*

  81. Spin Doctors? by KFury · · Score: 0, Troll

    First we hear about Microsoft being cited for allowing doctored nude photos, and now the FBI accidentally went too far protecting civil rights. I'm dizzy.

    I couldn't've thought of a story that: is plausable, shows that the FBI is ultra-concerned with respecting the privacy of ordinary citizens, and uses its overprotectiveness as an excuse for not having intercepted communications that it missed.

    The only logical american response is to say "Really guys, we don't care that much about our privacy. If you mess up and snag my email now and then, don't freak. It's okay, you don't have to go delete everything.

    After reading the article, it's clear that the real fault for not catching 9/11 isn't the FBI, but slashdotters who raise such a fuss about Carnivore as to make an FBI tech freak out.

    1. Re:Spin Doctors? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      The only logical american response is to say "Really guys, we don't care that much about our privacy. If you mess up and snag my email now and then, don't freak. It's okay, you don't have to go delete everything.

      I would never say such a thing in this lifetime.
      That's equivalent to saying, "Oh, it's alright guys, go ahead and database every gun purchase, and serial number. I have nothing to hide, i won't kill anyone!"

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  82. In Other News... by J3zmund · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...United States gives land back to original owners.

    My ass.

    --

    It's all Hood
  83. Dangerous Assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the contrary, there are numerous computer forensic techs (who are current agents), with ample training to execute their job. I might feel better if you were right, but don't assume they're all behind the curve.

    1. Re:Dangerous Assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing dangerous about it chief::you guys are old low tech and everybody worth anything are doing something with it, besides spying.

  84. Yah, right [was: Re:Perhaps...] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, right ...

    Anybody stupid enough to get embarrased by what Carnivore captures by accident deseres to get caught.

    Do you know how badly the FBI is going to get roasted if it turns out there was enough evidence in the "destroyed" emails (whether or not they were really destroyed is irrelevant ... it only matters whether or not they were acted upon) to avoid some or all of the terrorist acts they were looking for evidence about?

    And anyone who believes that their emails are immune to being snooped is smoking something that leads to delusions ...

  85. My son's a young girl???? by npsimons · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    and he's free to endanger more young girls, maybe even your son or daughter!


    My son's a young girl? Damn, it's so hard to keep up with kids these days. Oh, wait, I don't have any kids . . .


    (Sorry, I just couldn't resist :-)

    1. Re:My son's a young girl???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not yet, but he will be some day when he "comes out".

      If you want to know about what the future holds for your "son" you may want to ask The Oracle of Ya-Hoot who knows everything!

  86. Rockford Files by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    Sounds like an episode I just watched...FBI buffoons....ahh, it's just TV, after all.

    Believe it if you want to.

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  87. Now with valid HTML and correct links by goingware · · Score: 2
    A helpful reader named Jon Doyle wrote in to tell me I had a big HTML error in Why You Should use Encryption that caused half the page to be one big link. I hadn't noticed that because it didn't occur in the browsers I'd tried it with.

    I ran it through the W3C HTML validator and found quite a few problems with the HTML, and have fixed them. The page now validates as HTML 4.01 transitional.

    Also I have long had a bad link to a page called "Email Encryption Made Simple", and several people have written in over the last couple years to give me an updated URL, but I never got around to fixing it. Now the link works.

    Finally, I urge the use of PGP on the page. But Network Associates no longer supports PGP. I thought it would be helpful to mention GNU Privacy Guard, which is actually what I use these days. I added links to it and will try to elaborate on it in the discussion sometime in the next week or so.

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  88. Carnivore could be great for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SPAM Detection and removal. I mean if the system can be so well tuned as to sift through terabytes of froth each day, and pick out the emails from some scumbag terrorist, then shit - why not release the technology? I'd *LOVE* to use it to filter out the Spam w/the randomized text and number schemes that slip past the SPAM filters each and every day...

    Friggin FBI missed the boat on this one... All they have to do is license the product, have the BSA enforce the license, and then take the licensing fees and buy some more suitcase-sized nukes that could be shipped as "promotional luggage pieces" to terrorist leaders... Triggered a few days later, and boom... problem solved...

  89. How did it happen? by ClickNMix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All the issues about privacy with the FBI and the likes aside. I'm pretty worried about the fact that someone, even an FBI tech can delete the contents of a sniff.

    Sure, there are -probably- back-ups. But then if the tech makes those backups, whats to say he didnt delete them as well?

    Personally, it sounds more like a case of someone trying to abuse a tool they have access to (Tech sneeks a look at other peoples emails) and then messing up covering their tracks.

    Then he avoids getting attacked by putting a moral spin on it, and comming out a hero. (maybe)

    --
    I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
  90. Another Computing First?? by Catiline · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm... I read this story and thought...
    Is this the first time that a piece of software was defended when it did its' job-- but not what they told people-- by claiming "That's a bug, not a feature"?

    Then I noticed my tinfoil hat was maladjusted. So I guess they really did goof, Carnivore is just a powerful (if maladjusted) tool for law enforcement, and my fears to the contrary are just their attempts to discredit my typical insights into their foul ways with an insidiously sublte use of their orbital mind control rays.

  91. General IT incompetence by heckman · · Score: 1

    Read an article in the last month or so about the extremely sad state of IT affairs in the FBI. Generally they receive other government agency PC throw aways as their UPGRADE machines. What, are they using 386 processors now? Also, they raid their IT budget for other uses -- the last $90 million raid went to their travel budget. Knowing this, the incompetence they exhibit with Carnivore should not be surprising.

  92. The right thing was done by incunabulum · · Score: 1

    He did what he was supposed to do. He inadvertantly collected information on innocent people and then destroyed it upon recognition. That's what is supposed to happen to protect our rights. Morever, all this talk about backups or method of deletion doesn't matter. Even if that data is still somewhere, it can't be used (legally, that is). It was collected in an illegal manner and the innocent people are not under investigation. You don't go out of your way to resurrect data that you can't do anything with.

    --
    Why does this sig rock so hard?
  93. cover story on cnn.com by pohl · · Score: 1

    What is the jargon in PR circles when an interesting story like this one breaks, and you announce an even bigger story to hope that the more interesting one goes unnoticed?

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  94. Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to head toilet scrubber.

  95. Dark humor, perhaps? by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

    FBI? Someone during the Warren Commission investigation suggested that the acronym stood for Federal Bungled Investigations. And it always was, and it always will be, as long as law enforcement agencies sacrifice intelligence in the name of hiring folks who can be expected to follow orders without thinking.

    --
    Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  96. "If you're not doing anything wrong..." by Loundry · · Score: 2

    When privacy stories come up involving the government's right to peek into citizens' lives, there are always some people who state, "If you're not doing anything wrong, then what do you have to worry about?"

    Well, this is clearly one thing we should worry about. What happens when the government, which is composed of fallible humans, goofs in its actions and accidentally destroys the citizens' property? Now no one could say that "that wouldn't happen."

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  97. Slashdotter's Likely Caused the Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I recall from Slashdot when the Carnivore issue was a drawing fire from so many Slashdot readers, it was encouraged that everyone insert "keywords" into their e-mail to try and spoof or overload the Carnivore system. Now listen to you crying foul. How quickly we forget, does everyone now support and embrace Carnivore?

    A great bunch of hypocrites all!

  98. Not the version of Carnivore reviewed by mencik · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a member of the IITRI team that evaluated the Carnivore system, I'd like to point out that the dates of these memos indicate that the mistakes happened while using an earlier version of Carnivore than the one that we evaluated. I'm not trying to downplay the dangers of a device like Carnivore, but simply to point out that the FBI was aware of problems with their device, and was making modifications to it. One of the caveats of the independent review was that our review would only apply to a specific version of Carnivore, as we could not possibly know how changes made after we reviewed it would fix problems, or possibly introduce new ones. The version of the system we reviewed was not baselined until just before the review began.

    As a recap of our report, we pointed out that the accuracy of Carnivore collection was highly dependent on the correct setup of the filtering rules. We also pointed out that it was quite easy to make a mistake setting up those rules which would cause an over collection. The memos which were released do not indicate whether the overcollection was due to a filter setup mistake or some other bug that may have existed in a version prior to the one that we tested.

    As stated earlier, I am not trying to defend Carnivore, but you must put these documents into context with the time period in which they were produced.

  99. I think we may be missing the (hidden) point here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The scary thing is I can see the statements being fashioned in the halls of justice right now:

    "You know, we would have intercepted this communication and 9/11 could have been averted, if only we hadn't had our hands tied by these ranting leftist civil liberterians. Thousands died because we were afraid of what would have happened if we accidently picked up on innocent emails making plans for the holiday, or exchanging recipes. Now that we know what the cost of those silly liberties are, I think we all realize that 9/11 was too high a price to pay."

    Please exchange your constitutional rights for security. Before it is too late!!!

    Personally, I think we won't solve anything as long as we focus on the symptoms rather than the cause of these problems.

    Cheers

  100. Re:You're a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU have the name "Archie Bunker" and expect people to take you seriously saying "You're a retard"?

    that's laughable.

    and as for newslavery, you should wake up Archie. quite thought provoking.

  101. what is the point of this story by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    i dotn get it.. are you trying to say.. well carnivore is bad.. but to complain about the agent throwing away the emails would mean that you think we need to stuff..
    without carnivore.. there wouldnt be any emails..

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  102. CNN Article on the same by _jthm · · Score: 1

    http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/05/28/attack.carnivore. reut/

    good, bad, i'm the guy with the gun

  103. fbi agent erases carnivore data by tkjtkj · · Score: 1

    and of course the FBI has no access to the enormous data-recovery technologies of the NSA ..

    right...

    dont they know how hard it is to delete data so its not recoverable??

    or are their heads still up their ... whereever

    --
    "There are 11 kinds of people: those who know binary, those who don't, and those who could not care less!"
  104. It's not the law, it's the constitution by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    And no lower court can remand our rights.

    No Congress can abridge our rights.

    As with Korea, as with WW II and internment, illegal unconstitutional acts shall never stand, they only exist and are struck down in time.

    We, who realize the implications of such unconstitutional actions taken under the guise of hunting down the terrorists (a good thing), must safeguard our rights - for few others realize what is at stake.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  105. and we're supposed to believe this crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come off it. you guys at fbi made a booboo and didnt catch ladenn planning things. alright everybody makes mistakes. admit it and see it doesnt happen again. dont give crap excuses. and run a routine screen on everyone agin.

  106. Found Rowley's fax# and postal address by goingware · · Score: 2
    Here's Colleen Rowley's contact info. The news reports and her letter indicate she works at the Minneapolis FBI field office, so I guess anything sent to the address or fax number listed on their contact page should reach her.

    Federal Bureau of Investigation
    111 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1100
    Minneapolis, MN 55401
    Phone: (612) 376-3200 Fax: (612) 376-3249
    Email: minneapolis@fbi.gov

    I'm going to write a brief letter with the above speech included and fax it to her later today.

    Mike

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  107. Re:Fbi Document - 2 Years Old!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the date on top of the Memo.. This is old news... 4/5/00???

  108. Deletining files illegal? by ehiris · · Score: 2

    Personally I'd prefer the caps lock key to be illegal rather then the delete key.

    And don't do a "Tab"!

  109. "Unreasonable Searches" by karb · · Score: 1

    It's very hard to argue that a software bug causing unintended data collection results in an 'unreasonable' search. Especially if the data was never accessed. There's no such thing as constitutionslaughter.

    --

    Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

  110. No, the WRONG thing was done. by JohnQPublic · · Score: 1
    He did what he was supposed to do. He inadvertantly collected information on innocent people and then destroyed it upon recognition. That's what is supposed to happen to protect our rights.

    No, what was supposed to happen, as pointed out in the SF Gate article, was that the data should have been retained for judicial review, as part of normal oversight procedures:

    Henry Perritt, who led a team authorized by the FBI to review the surveillance system, said he was surprised the technician deleted the e-mails.

    "The collection is supposed to be retained for judicial review," Perritt said. "If an agent simply deleted a whole bunch of files without the court instructing, that's not the way it's supposed to work."

    Morever, all this talk about backups or method of deletion doesn't matter. Even if that data is still somewhere, it can't be used (legally, that is). It was collected in an illegal manner and the innocent people are not under investigation. You don't go out of your way to resurrect data that you can't do anything with

    You're right, you don't. Instead, you go out of your way to delete data that would point to criminal activity on your own point - such as violating the terms of a search warrant.

  111. PLEASE READ THIS by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2
    The first issue, of course, is whether the searches in question were actually illegal. That in turn hinges on whether or not the searches are, in the words of the 4th, "unreasonable". I'm not claiming that it's a good idea or that the gov't is necessarility justified in what they did, but the fact that you find it distasteful does not necessarily make it unconstitutional or illegal.

    I can see from your comment and others that many people are reading "unreasonable" as something which is debatable. It is important that people understand the the terms "reason" and "cause" have specific legal meanings and they are synonyms in this context. Saying that NO searches will take place WITHOUT reason is the same as saying that searches will ONLY take place WITH reason, which is exactly what they say in the following clause when they specify that a narrowly defined warrant MUST be issued first and a warrant can ONLY be issued when the evidence shows that a crime has PROBABLY been committed.

    I know you weren't trolling. I wish I had replied sooner so that more people might have seen this because it seems that quite a few people are misinterpreting based on "conversational" English. And this is an incredibly important point today judging by the way things have been headed lately.

  112. latest headline by indiechild · · Score: 1

    "Accidental FBI screwup destroys evidence proving JFK was murdered by the CIA."

  113. In the mirror by SimCash · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Then the FBI tech was "so upset" that he destroyed ALL of the collected email, not only the information that was not covered by the warrant.
    Yeah right. The fact that this even seemed credible is a stark reminder that the average FBI agent works for a boss who is
    • painfully politically correct,
    • anal-retentitive,
    • will hang yer ass out if you try to exercise your own good judgment instead of following my paranoid (after all, you are out to get everyone) rules designed to keep you from EVER using any form of common sense because you are, after all, a fekkin tool of an oppressive regime.
    I refer, of course, to the common taxpayer as presented to the FBI by the press.

    People, people, people. If you crucify and excoriate anyone in public service who uses the least bit of common sense, then do not come crying to me when all you get in government service are a bunch of timid drones who follow the rules flying in the face of what you think a reasonable person should do. You reap what you sew. Since the 60's we have sewn timid book following drones more than visionary risk takers. Of course, too many risk takers and you get too many Ruby Ridges, Waco's and Philadelphia's, the trick (which we have not learned) is to walk the line between the two. Unfortunately, there are institutions (like the ACLU) who dedicate themselves to preventing the risky behaviors, but none who are successful in de-neutering the resulting drones.

  114. Let's give'm something to talk about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of the real news.

    Everytime last fall that news agencies were about to talk about Florida election results...

    AIRPLANES ARE FALLING FROM THE SKY!!!

    Terrorist the first time. [sep 11]
    Fine craftsmenship the second when another plane splatters in NY because the tail fell off.

    Hmmmm..... Let's please not talk about Florida any time I have to fly thank you!