Slashdot Mirror


SDSU Students Create Sporty Hybrid Vehicle

Nevyan writes "SDSU Engineering students working in conjunction with real life designers create an electric hybrid vehicle that actually...well.. looks cool for all the right reasons. Participant in the Tour de Sol. I happened to see this vehicle on campus at SDSU and I want to buy one so badly." Njaneer.com has more information and photos - here's one to give you an idea of the size.

269 comments

  1. YES!! Finally!! by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    I've been saying this among friends for a while... the only reason that these early electric and hybrid cars all look like ass! I think Honda caught onto the design thing, and thus we have the hybrid Civic. Other than that, this new car looks almost attractive.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  2. .NET forms are the coolest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love you, man.

  3. Good thing you don't need gas by Gerrioholic99 · · Score: 1

    I am sure that after you spend all that money on one of those suckers... you'll be glad you're saving all that gas money

    1. Re:Good thing you don't need gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO JAM!

    2. Re:Good thing you don't need gas by NickisGod.com · · Score: 1

      I am sure that after you spend all that money on one of those suckers... you'll be glad you're saving all that gas money

      That's a good point, our governments need to step in and subsidize these hydbrid and electric cars so they are cheaper than gas-guzzler-real cars. That might make Joe Schmo and Nick go out and actually buy one.

      Oh, and I'm sorry, this car looks stupid too. Why can't they make the fskers look like real cars?

  4. body ripped off thunderranch by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 4, Informative

    laff, thats the "riot" by thunder ranch.
    not exactly but i assume its mods are for the hybrid part or it could be the riot 2 (thunder ranch is slow on putting things on their page)

    -rev

    1. Re:body ripped off thunderranch by sio2man · · Score: 1

      Definately the riot. I had one in my driveway for 6 years, then returned it to the owner of Thunder Ranch(a good friend) to be finished and sold on consignment. The riot is a kick ass kit, if anyone has any questions that they'd be interested in having answered, e-mail me at damen_red@please-don't-spam-me.yahoo.com. I like the upgrades like DOORS, the origional didn't come with them. I can't believe that they don't mention where the body and essentially origional concept came from. One of thunder ranch's other projects was making concept electric cars.
      DR

    2. Re:body ripped off thunderranch by ckimyt · · Score: 1


      Which in turn is really a rip off of the 1985 Buick Wildcat concept car.

      I'm very disappointed this never went anywhere. It had a HUD, steering-wheel-mounted shifter, mid-mounted engine, and a one-piece lift-up canopy. Very cool.

      --

      Putting the sig back into +1, Insightful since 1995!
    3. Re:body ripped off thunderranch by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... checked out the riot web page and it has a link back to the SDSU College of Engineering at the bottom. Coincidence? I think not.

      --
      My name fits again.
    4. Re:body ripped off thunderranch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Stumpy Corvette ripoffs rule! What a fsckn' riot!

  5. The irony by pheph · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Right next to the picture of a tiny 'high performance' car that probably wouldn't withstand the impact of the cone its steering around is a link entitled 'SDSU College of Engineering suffers a tremendous loss... which details a professor who recently died in an auto accident.

    1. Re:The irony by Xoro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also sad: Proof that a cool car doesn't make you look any less geeky...

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    2. Re:The irony by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      He will be forever missed--fair well my friend

      God damn it. It isn't fair well. It is farewell .

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    3. Re:The irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't "God damn it". It is "gall darn it" or "dad gummit".

    4. Re:The irony by njaneer · · Score: 1

      Let us see, your car has bumpers consisting of foam and plastic (yes, you have an airbag, but that will just fracture your spine on impact) Ours is a carbon fiber body with a chassis built with 4130 and 1040 steel and a Kevlar fuel bladder capable of withstanding high-speed impacts. Oh a five-point harness and additional safety factors to lengthy to discuss are included, and not worth discussion, because more than likely it is beyond the scope of your mental acumen. If anyone's vehicle will emulsify upon impact with a rodent crossing the street--it is yours. Get a clue, idiot.

  6. lifetime of waiting by butternipples+wee · · Score: 0

    too bad the oil companies will do all they can to keep those kinds of cars from selling, hurts their profits you know

    1. Re:lifetime of waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...but energy companies will love it. Guess what...they are both huge - and sometimes the same freaking company.

    2. Re:lifetime of waiting by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2, Interesting
      too bad the oil companies will do all they can to keep those kinds of cars from selling, hurts their profits you know

      Well, the auto companies (well, really the auto industry) stand to have a more damaged profit margin than the oil companies do. An ICE (internal combuston Engine) based car cost 28cent per mile to run (about 6cent of that goes to gas, the rest is spend on brakes, oil changes and replacement parts and repairs), and electric car cost about 6 cents per mile run, around half of this is spend on charging the batteries, the rest is spent on new motor brushs (At 80k miles) and replacing all the batteries after 4 or 5 years (also brakes, which may wear less if you have regenerative braking, or may wear more because the car has to be heavier due the wieght of batteries.

      I think that everybody in a household should have an electric car for driving around town...

      Here are 100s of ICE cars converted to electric

      I'd like to see a used car dealership that buys ICE cars with blown motors and converts them to electric, every town should have one....

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    3. Re:lifetime of waiting by Technician · · Score: 2

      Regarding the brushes in the electric motor... In the Toyota Prius, it's an induction motor/generator.
      Regarding the brakes and wear regarding the increased weight from the batteries. In the Toyota Prius, it's 110 lbs. The 1.5 Liter engine with the generator/starter and motor/generator and battery is about the same weight as the V6 engine it replaces. So same weight, but most of the braking is done regeneratively, so brakes are saved from wear.
      Since the gas engine is shut down much of the time, and does not waste fuel idling, the recommended service interval (oil changes) is 7500 miles, not 3000 miles most cars get. Think of the oil saved, not just the gas saved. Even with the savings, it has the get up a go of a typical V6 of the same weight.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:lifetime of waiting by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      Regarding the brakes and wear regarding the increased weight from the batteries. In the Toyota Prius, it's 110 lbs. The 1.5 Liter engine with the generator/starter and motor/generator and battery is about the same weight as the V6 engine it replaces.

      This might be true of factory hybrids, but if you want a pure electric converted from $300 car with a blown out engine, then you find that weight saved from the removal for the ICE, exaust system, fuel tank (and fuel), isn't going to off set the weight of enought deep cycle batteries to give you a nice range...

      Check out the before and after curb weights at evalbum.com.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
  7. SDSU != South Dakota State University by DaHat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just a warning to all of my fellow South Dakota residence... in this case SDSU is not South Dakota State University in Brookings South Dakota, but sadly is in fact San Diego State University... blast those Californians taking all of our acronyms... in this world if you say SF or SD people think you mean San Francisco or San Diego... when will the world learn that they mean Sioux Falls and South Dakota instead! The FAA and Post Office agree with me... when will the rest of you?

    1. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by DavittJPotter · · Score: 1

      Heh. I was, in fact, wondering. :) I expected to see a BHSU acronym in there some where.

      Heh.

      Thanks for a laugh.

      --
      "If there's hope, it lies in the proles..."
    2. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      What exactly is made/produced/grown in South Dakota? Not intended as a flame, I just realized that I don't really know...

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    3. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by thunderbird46 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lots of wheat, corn, soybeans, and beef. Some tech products, though, too -- Gateway started out here.

    4. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by thunderbird46 · · Score: 1

      Bwahahaha! Well said! As an engineering student at South Dakota State I looked at the title of this article and asked myself, "Why the heck wasn't this thing at Engineering Expo?!?"

    5. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corn, beans, wheat, and some sorguhm are grown here. For tech stuff, there is Gateway and there's a 3M plant here too.

      Out west in the state, there is a gold mine.

    6. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they were too busy gawking over that sexy new john deere tractor.

    7. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Thanks! For some reason I thought Gateway had started in Kansas. Must have to do with the fact that my sister lives there and she's got a fascination with the spotted cow pattern that they use on their boxes... :)

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    8. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting
      Gateway's headquarters was moved a couple years back to...

      wait for it...

      San Diego! Actually, it was La Jolla, but that's just about the same.

      --
      Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    9. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by nick+this · · Score: 2

      That's because BHSU students couldn't design a hybrid car. Generally, they'd be lucky to merely identify a car correctly two times out of three.

      Now SDSM&T, on the other hand... *that's* an engineering school.

      :)

      Let the flames begin. (Between me an the other four /. readers from SD)

    10. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I'm from Eagle Butte :)

    11. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The FAA... agree with me

      I work for the Fresno Academic Administration and I can assure you that we do not!

    12. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

      nope. they started in Sioux Falls, South Dakota in a barn. They do have a Office in the Kansas City, MO area though.

    13. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by DaHat · · Score: 1

      and it is a move that Gateway regrets to this day... since they moved their main headquarters out there their sales have plummeted. On the plus side though they still have their largest manufacturing facilities, tech support and sales still in Sioux Falls.

    14. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by DaHat · · Score: 1

      For bonus points ... where did the Gateway founder grow up? (I will accept the state)

    15. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Madison here. God bless DSU (formerly General Beadle State Teachers College)

    16. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by BitHive · · Score: 1

      In other news, UCLA recently announced that it is not the Upper Corner of Lower Alabama

    17. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey if you think this is bad, how do you think non-Americans in other parts of the world are taking it? it's this bloody america-is-the-world mentality crap again.

    18. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by NetFu · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, the engineering school of shame. Come on out to California, and I'll show you some REAL competition! (and I'm a SDSM&T Alumni!)

    19. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      Everybody together now!

      Far beyond the hills of Rapid,
      there for all to screw,
      lies an old abandoned shithouse
      called BHSU...

      Go Hardrockers!

    20. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

      seeing as how he grew up raising hosteine cows in South Dakota i would guess that would be South Dakota.

    21. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

      its in Pow wow (or however it is spelled) California

    22. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by 73 · · Score: 1

      It also has the arhive of just about all the digital Satellite and other image data that the Government's been collecting for the past 60 years. The EROS Data Center otutside Sioux Falls. Oh yeah, and they have a Beowolf Cluster there. :-)

    23. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes you Eagle Shite :)

    24. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by killthiskid · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll chime in from USD in Vermillion. I went to SDSM&T, and now work at USD. I left the state for a while, but I had to come back (I missed it, auuugh, there I admitted it!).


      And, since this is a flame war, I'd just like to point out that USD has gotten more press and publicity via the Hand Held Project than the rest of the regent schools combined! =)


      HA HA (Nelson style).

    25. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If memory serves me.....engineering competition between SDSU, South Dakota State University, and SDSMT, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, took the form of building and racing cement canoes, a favorite watercraft used on the streams found in the Black Hills and the lovely prarie lakes of the Dakotas. The saddest point to this ramble is the realization that all of that engineering talent leaves the state to apply their tallent and imagination.

      So, to answer, to some degree, your question, educated, imaginative and hard working young folks is one of the things that is made/produced/grown in South Dakota.

    26. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by ar1550 · · Score: 1

      Aren't the Dakotas part of Canada?

      --
      I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
    27. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by schon · · Score: 1

      SDSU is not South Dakota State University in Brookings South Dakota, but sadly is in fact San Diego State University

      Interesting... I had no idea that San Diego became a state...

      Can anyone from there tell me when that happened? Did you finally decide you'd had enough of Gray Davis?

      those Californians taking all of our acronyms

      Now I'm REALLY confused.. if San Diego is a state, how come they're still called Californians?

    28. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gateway started in Iowa. Then moved to South Dakota, then moved the HQ to Poway, CA.

    29. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 1
      Aren't the Dakotas part of Canada?

      No, I think they pawned 'em off on us for a couple of beaver pelts...

      --
      Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
    30. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by iceburn · · Score: 1

      Bah! At least over at BH we have girls!!!

      --
      A sphincter says what?
    31. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USD= University of San Diego???

    32. Re:SDSU != South Dakota State University by asland · · Score: 1

      Cheers from a SDSMT student!

  8. impact on the enviornment? by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i know it's not completely on topic, but i'm starting to question whether or not hybrid cars are really more safe for the enviornment. after all, where does the electricity for the car come from? mostly from fossil-fuel burning power plants which really do the same thing as your car.

    i may be missing something here, if so please point it out.

    greg clarke

    --
    sig - .
    1. Re:impact on the enviornment? by Dreamweaver · · Score: 5, Informative

      Modern hybrid cars don't get plugged into electrical outlets. They use some sort of conservation strategy to burn gasoline in order to charge up a battery while you're driving, that way you run part of the time purely on electric power. Thus, you still fill it up with gas; just less often than normal. That's why you'll see hybrid cars advertising some big number of miles-per-gallon.

      So yeah, hybrids aren't as clean as a purely electrical or hydrogen fuel-cell car would be, but they have significantly less emissions-per-mile than a regular car simply because they burn less fuel over time.

      (Note, I may be totally off about the battery charging thing. I don't know or claim to know how they work exactly, but I know that's the basic premise. Anyone with more details, please post. I'd like to know more but have never found myself motivated to go look :))

      --


      "If a man hasn't discovered something he will die for, he isn't fit to live" -- MLK, Jr.
    2. Re:impact on the enviornment? by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 1

      ah right. in the back of my head i knew that about the recharging thing. heh. thanks

      greg clarke

      --
      sig - .
    3. Re:impact on the enviornment? by Rimbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hybrid cars get their electricity from the motor, usually a diesel. It's the same idea as running SETI@Home on your computer, or how a turbo works -- pumping spare energy into storage, to give you a boost one way or another.

      As for electrics, the electricity at least doesn't HAVE to come from a fossil-fuel-burning plant. It can come from hydroelectric power, from wind power, from solar power, or from nuclear power. It at least gives us a choice of what power source we can use, by converting that power source into something universal.

      Ultimately, the real problem with fossil fuels is that we're locked into using them -- this is bad because we will eventually run out, and it is bad because we are forced to send our money to folks in the Middle East, some of whom then send that money to terrorist organizations, some of whom then kill Americans.

      Electricity, at least, can be created through many sources.

      But then, that's electrics, not hybrids.

    4. Re:impact on the enviornment? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Whenever you brake, instead of just wasting all the energy that the wheels have, some of it is converted into electricity.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    5. Re:impact on the enviornment? by Skidge · · Score: 2

      Others pointed out that current hybrids aren't plugged in to get their power, but even if they were, it would probably be cleaner. If the power is generated at a fossil fuel burning plant, the pollution is coming from a single point source -- much easier to clean/filter/whatever than when it comes out the tail pipes of cars spread all over the landscape.

      Anyone else remember the Bill Nye episode where he explained this?

    6. Re:impact on the enviornment? by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 1

      please ignore the parent. i had a brain fart. really. i'm not this dumb.

      worst birthday ever.

      --
      sig - .
    7. Re:impact on the enviornment? by fo0bar · · Score: 1
      Modern hybrid cars don't get plugged into electrical outlets. They use some sort of conservation strategy to burn gasoline in order to charge up a battery while you're driving, that way you run part of the time purely on electric power. Thus, you still fill it up with gas; just less often than normal. That's why you'll see hybrid cars advertising some big number of miles-per-gallon.

      As TheOnlyCoolTim also mentioned, resistence from braking (and even coasting to some extent) is used to power the battery. This is called regenerative braking. Modern hybrid cars use both that and what you mentioned; taking extra energy from the engine and essentially turning the electric motor backwards into a generator. This is all computer controlled, allowing maximum power to be automatically used if it's needed (climbing up a hill or whatnot), but not wasting too much energy when the extra power is not needed.

    8. Re:impact on the enviornment? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      The lower emissions are not only because hybrids burn less fuel.

      Idling, peak acceleration and sudden throttle changes are the operating regimes where gasoline engines are most polluting. Hybrid technology takes care of all three. Hybrids can turn off the gas engine when the car's not moving, can borrow energy from the battery to meet peak demand without having to push the gas engine, and can instantly throttle the electric motor to provide responsiveness.

      The Prius is an SULEV, a Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle. It's several years ahead of even California standards.

      Glad someone's taking the sporty route. My Prius's drive motor could deliver 258 foot-pounds at 0 rpm if the computer would allow it. Toyota went for conservative design and lightweight parts instead. They made the right choice for proving that hybrids are practical. Now we'll get to see that hybrids are fun;

      Oh, and you want to know just how fast a computer can throttle an electric motor? The Honda Insight has a 3-cylinder engine which runs smoothly. The reason it runs smoothly is that the Insight's electric motor changes torque in real time to counter the momentary imbalance from the gas engine. Sort of a software flywheel.

      The other replies to this parent have good info about how hybrids get charged.

    9. Re:impact on the enviornment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So yeah, hybrids aren't as clean as a purely electrical or hydrogen fuel-cell car would be

      Awright, I'm sick of seeing this one spouted. Purely electrical cars are not "clean". They're TEV (_transferred_ emissions vehicles). Where the heck do you, especially you Californians who think they're so great, think the electricity comes from to recharge these? Somewhere else, that's where. Where it's generated either from coal-burning plants (allegedly bad), nuclear plants (allegedly bad), or hydro power (even _those_ are allegedly bad, for interfering with the fishies). You're just polluting somewhere else! Stop with the condescending "we care about the environment" attitude -- at least I'm living in what I'm burning. ;-)

      Now a fuel-cell hybrid, that's a different story...

    10. Re:impact on the enviornment? by pentalive · · Score: 1

      I think others may have said this, but simply put. The gas engine in one of these is much smaller than that in a normal car. It always runs at it's most effcient speed, cuz all it has to do is generate the most electrical power from a given amount of gas.

      Besides - If you plug your all electric car in at night where does that electricity come fromm. Only a small part is renewable (wind, hydro, solar...) the rest is fossil-fuel.

    11. Re:impact on the enviornment? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      True, electrical cars are not zero pollution vehicles, but they certainly ARE more clean than gas, or even hybrid powered cars, because those all "allegedly bad" big power plants are more efficient in converting whatever they use to energy, than small car-motor sized ones. And it all being in same place makes it easier to filter emissions if it becomes necessary.

    12. Re:impact on the enviornment? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Oh, and yes, forgot to mention, fuel-cell powered electrical motors are just as much TEV as battery using electrical motor, because hydrogen they use must be produced somehow, requiring energy, which probably will come from those very same "allegedly bad" big powerplants.

    13. Re:impact on the enviornment? by peddrenth · · Score: 2

      "where does the electricity for the car come from?"

      Power stations. They're a lot more efficient than petrol engines, they use better fuel (no point wasting oil when coal/gas will do), they have emissions monitoring and regulation, they're sited away from cities, and if you live in a civilised country, they're already starting to become solar/wind/nuclear-powered. For example, drive that electric car in norway and you'll be burning 98% hydroelectrric power, rather than 1/30 gallons per mile of 25% efficient petrol which needs mining out of nature reserves.

      It sounds weird, but using electricity from a big power station gives you more energy per unit pollution than just burning "concentrated" fuel in your car itself.

  9. its like... by aliusblank · · Score: 0

    the pontiac fiero, all over again

  10. Quite impressive... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    If you were to remove the Manufacturer, Type, and Maximum Range lines from the specs page it would read like any other car company. I wonder why it only has a 5 gallon tank, which limits it to 400 miles driving range (which is still decent). I attend Western Washington University, where our engineering department is famous for the Vehicle Research Institute... I wonder if there's anything similar happening on campus.

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:Quite impressive... by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 2

      My regular Honda Civic that I drive to work every day gets about 400 miles to the tank. If I had to only fill up 5 gallons, compared to the 10 I have to now, I'd hella get it.

    2. Re:Quite impressive... by vespazzari · · Score: 1

      my guess would be weight, a 5 gallon tank only allows so much fuel. I am assuming that they built this car to be as effecient as possible, they would more than likely want to make it as light as possible.

      --
      "Alcohol, cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:Quite impressive... by rusty0101 · · Score: 2

      Gasoline is a fluid with weight characteristics similar to water. 1 gallon of water weighs 8 lb, one liter of water weighs 1 kg. Gasoline is slightly lighter (floats on water) but this vehicle runs on Diesel, which I don't remember it's actual weight properties. As a result I am assuming that it is also similar to water, someone can provide the correct numbers.

      At five gallons, or just under 20 liters, the weight of the fule is 5*8/22000 or just over .18% of the weight of the car. I do not know what the crossover point for this vehicle is, but at some point the added weight for a full tank, with expected passenger load will result in lower millage figures than they designers think is acceptable.

      The average range for cars on a full tank of gas isn't much differnt than this vehicles range. Both are significantly longer than most purely electric's 75-100 mile range. Though for 99% of my needs, 75-100 miles is more than sufficient.

      400 miles at 70 mph (average freeway speeds) is over 5 hours of driving.

      But then I don't speak for how you use your car.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    4. Re:Quite impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say there should be a 10-12 gallon tank in there. That way you could drive 750-1000 miles before having to go to the gas station again.

  11. Fiero F-40 kit? by Home�rew · · Score: 1

    it looks like one of those fiero F40's. I wouldn't wanna be seen dead in that thing. Maybe Carmac could get one tho.

    --
    Pablo Piccaso was never called an asshole. Not like you.
    1. Re:Fiero F-40 kit? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Love the sig. Repo Man sound track.

      "Well the girls would turn the color of an
      Avacado

      When he'd drive down the street in his
      El Dorado

      While he was only Five foot Three
      Girls could not resist his stare

      Pablo Picasso was never called an asshole"

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Fiero F-40 kit? by flewp · · Score: 2

      I think it looks more like one of those new ugly Toyota MR2's.
      On a side note, I don't think anyone should try and recreate the F40, it's the greatest driving machine of all time.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    3. Re:Fiero F-40 kit? by Boulder+Geek · · Score: 1

      Uh, excuse me? Yeah, Juicy Bananas covered it for Repo Man, but the song is from the early Lou Reed wannabe days of Jonathan Richmond. Who went on to pen such classics as "Ice Cream Man" and the immortal "I'm a Little Airplane."

      --
      A well-crafted lie appears unquestionable - Dama Mahaleo
    4. Re:Fiero F-40 kit? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Interesting didn't know it, only heard the Juicy Bananas version. I'll check it out.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  12. scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this actually renders better in mozilla

    1. Re:scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is i actually opened up Mozilla quick to see if you were right... and well, I wish I hadn't.

    2. Re:scary by mrwonton · · Score: 1

      Weather it renders better or not, I still love Mozilla 1.0

      --
      Not more than you need, just more than you want
    3. Re:scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We do not guarantee that any source code or executable code available from the mozilla.org domain is Year 2000 compliant"


      If they can't even guarentee year 2000 compliance then why should I trust this software on a computer connected to the internet???

  13. I'd buy it by indigofire.net · · Score: 1

    I've said for a while that when they make electric or hybrid cars that are as fun to drive as mine (I drive a Mazda MX-6, '93), I'll go for it. With a peak output of 250HP, that's definitely getting there! I haven't actually tested my car for power / accelleration, but 0-60 in 7s is nice. I just wonder how long the battery would last with ME driving!

    Now, if they can find a way to produce them economically (i.e. I can't pay more than $40,000CDN for one), then I'd buy one.

    --
    -iF
    1. Re:I'd buy it by raygundan · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't have to charge the battery in a hybrid from an external source. Ever. Just put gas in. In fact, aggressive driving with lots of hard braking would charge it faster in current hybrids.

      Honda has a sweet prototype called the DualNote that makes 400hp and gets 43mpg. I would certainly be in for that!! I'd be even happier at 200hp/86mpg, though. Something small and fun like a WRX that gets 86mpg would rule.

    2. Re:I'd buy it by PD · · Score: 1

      Gimme a break with that 250 HP stuff. More like 170 probably. If you had 250HP in an MX-3, even the special purple ones, you'd be in the high 5's 0-60.

      And yes, I've actually driven one of the purple ones with the special engine, suspension, etc. It's a truly excellent car, but not 250 HP.

    3. Re:I'd buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he means the electric, loser

    4. Re:I'd buy it by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      0-60mph in 7 seconds or more will severely limit your chances of merging on short ramps into heavy fast traffic in freeways :P

      as for the 250HP rating is that BHP? or actual at the wheels power? my Truck is rated to do close to 300BHP but puts around 200 or so the the wheels (ouch)

      but thats the thing with the hybrids.. they may be slow as shit but they do convert that generated power to movement at very great efficiencies

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
  14. Here is a mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Here is a mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very funny. Here's a real mirror

    2. Re:Here is a mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that say? ASSHOLES are closer than they appear?

    3. Re:Here is a mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ____ __ _

    4. Re:Here is a mirror by superpeach · · Score: 1

      Ages: 3 yrs. & up Right.. I am 23, and I doubt I would be able to fit in one of them.
      It looks kind of fun though, not quite a good as the one mentioned in the article, but still nice (for little people). Quite scary the way they mention risk of death though.

  15. When can I buy one.... by gillbates · · Score: 2
    Let's see....

    250 Horsepower, 0-60 in under 7 seconds, 80 mpg - when can I buy one?!

    With the price of gas expected to rise by 40 cents a gallon in the Chicago area to more than $2/gallon, I wouldn't mind owning one of these. It's about time a "high performance" vehicle was truly high performance when it comes to fuel economy.

    Having been a gear-head for a while, I can tell you that high-performance and fuel efficiency were often on opposite ends of the spectrum; high performance has been synonymous with poor fuel economy ever since I can remember. It's good to see engineering talent change this. I for one wouldn't mind owning a very agile car with good fuel economy.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:When can I buy one.... by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
      Damn straight.

      Finally some respectible specs for a hybrid vehicle. The Toyota and Honda products not only look like ass, as asserted above, but accelerate like ass. If a car can't do 0-60 in under 10 seconds, I don't care how good it is on gas.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    2. Re:When can I buy one.... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 2
      Having been a gear-head for a while, I can tell you that high-performance and fuel efficiency were often on opposite ends of the spectrum; high performance has been synonymous with poor fuel economy ever since I can remember.

      One thing that you may (or not) have overlooked ... dry weight ... 2200 lbs !!! ... just over a ton ... that's pretty light ... the problem with that comes safety ...

      Look at the pictures ... through the wheel spokes, you can see the other side of the car and the body supports. This may not be very collision safe next to a "normal" car ... and this is just a bunch of plastic next to a SUV ...

      Now ... don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind one of these ... I think they would be pretty fun to drive.

      The range on these appears to be pretty good ... ~400mi ... on only 5 gal gasoline ...

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    3. Re:When can I buy one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This may not be very collision safe next to a "normal" car ... and this is just a bunch of plastic next to a SUV ..."

      If you want a tank... then fuel-efficient cars will probably not interest you!

    4. Re:When can I buy one.... by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Getting slightly off topic here, but I would point out that the vehicle is using at least four point seat belts. I have no doubt that the desingers are very concerned about the safety of this vehicle. It is also a test vehicle rather than a prototype.

      At the other end of this is the fact that percieved safety on the part of the driver has an inverse ration to the results of colisions. i.e. if the driver percieves the vehicle as safe, the results of accidents the driver is in are worse.

      One way to think about it is how much more attention would you pay to the environment you are driving in, if you were told that the air-bag electronics were wired to a couple of sticks of dynamite under your seat. As long as you prevented yourself from being in an accident, you would survive.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  16. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a better looking, better performing car, and it ain't no stnking "hybrid".

  17. "Ripped off"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Maybe they just bought a Riot kit and put thier engine in it.

    Duh.

    Although that does dampen the whole "looks really fucking cool" angle.

  18. A common misconception. by raygundan · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's either one of the most common misconceptions about hybrid cars, or a magnificent troll. I'll answer it either way, just so somebody else isn't confused...

    Current hybrids like the Prius, Insight, and Civic don't need external electric charging. Their batteries are very small, and store energy generated by braking or excess power from the gas engine if necessary. The economy comes from a couple of things:

    1. You get back energy when you brake.
    2. Your gas+electric motors combined are approximately the same power output as a traditional gas motor, but you can turn off part of a hybrid when you don't need it. So you've got the power you need for acceleration, but once you're cruising, the extra motor can cut out leaving you using less energy.
    3. Your gas engine can shut off at stoplights, since your electric motor acts as the world's most kickass starter motor. (For example, the Prius' electric motor brings the gas engine to speed in less than one revolution)
    4. Your electric motor doesn't waste power "idling".

    At no point are you ever charging your battery with power generated from a power plant. They really are just more efficient than gas-only cars at the moment.

    1. Re:A common misconception. by flewp · · Score: 2

      Actually, in the next generation hybrid cars (Due out in 2003 or 2004) according to a Popular Science article, these hybrids will have boosted acceleration. The electric motors coupled with their standard engines gives more power for acceleration. However, the electric motors are not as efficient at higher speeds. If I recall the article correctly, Dodge believes they could reduce 0-60 time by 2 seconds if a system were put on a Viper. I vaguely recall something about 200 extra horses, but I can't say with any certainty that's the case.
      I believe the "Big Three" are all also going to be putting out hybrids such as SUVs and trucks in the next couple years.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    2. Re:A common misconception. by ender81b · · Score: 2

      The one problem with hybird cars that would prevent me from buying one (besides hte fact that i'm a poor college student =)) is I wonder what effect the near constant starting of the motor has on the life of the engine. It bugs me. I just can't believe that a engine would last as long being started 40-50 times a day normal driving.

    3. Re:A common misconception. by peddrenth · · Score: 1

      5. You can run the 'gas' (petrol) engine at constant speed, hence maximum efficiency, regardless of the speed of your car.

      (See diesel-train designs for details -- they've been doing this for decades)

    4. Re:A common misconception. by peddrenth · · Score: 2

      I just can't believe that a engine would last as long being started 40-50 times a day normal driving

      It'll probably mean that lots of parts need regular replacement by an authorised dealer, and that the car becomes obsolete after 3 years, if current practise is anything to go by...

    5. Re:A common misconception. by Suidae · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you are bothered by the 'starting your engine is the worst thing you can do to it' stuff put out by the oil companies? If so, consider that starting is a problem because you generally start the engine after it has been sitting all night, allowing most of the oil to drain away from where its needed. If you are going to start it 50 times in 8 hours, the wear caused by poorly lubed parts isn't going to occur, because the parts will still be lubed.

    6. Re:A common misconception. by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      If I recall the article correctly, Dodge believes they could reduce 0-60 time by 2 seconds if a system were put on a Viper. I vaguely recall something about 200 extra horses, but I can't say with any certainty that's the case.

      It's probably not horsepower so much as it is torque. Internal-combustion engines produce maximum torque (and power as well) at some non-zero rotational speed (usually, it's quite a bit to the right on the curve...3000 rpm or higher, unless it's a big-ass diesel). An electric motor, OTOH, produces maximum torque when it's stopped and still delivers plenty of torque at low speeds...and low speeds are what you're dealing with when you're accelerating from a stop. Torque is what gets you off the line, not horsepower.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    7. Re:A common misconception. by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I just can't believe that a engine would last as long being started 40-50 times a day normal driving

      It'll probably mean that lots of parts need regular replacement by an authorised dealer, and that the car becomes obsolete after 3 years, if current practise is anything to go by...

      Sounds like a flawed design if that's the case. Properly maintained and not abused, a car ought to be good for at least something like 10-15 years (preferably more than that) before you need to start looking at rebuilding engines and such. Before that, it ought not need much more than oil changes and maybe new rubber parts (belts/hoses/tires).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:A common misconception. by raygundan · · Score: 1

      With a 60hp starter motor, your engine doesn't have to ever run at low rpms when starting. In a Prius, you're at operating speed before it's even turned over once, which cuts out a chunk of the wear, I imagine.

  19. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And *only* at the measily cost of somewhere between $40-120K US.

    Give me a break...

  20. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Izanagi · · Score: 1

    Well, this is the first hybrid I've seen that you literally put on! On your ass for that matter too!

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
  21. Yes - Impact on the enviornment, but less by OffTheRack · · Score: 1

    Ironically, this hybrid burns diesel fuel. That is a pretty dirty thing.

    However, one way hybrids are cleaner than conventional rides burning the same materials is that they run their combustion engines at a constant "ideal" rpm. All piston engines have a specific RPM where the ratio of pollution to power is smallest. Car engines driving wheels mechanically pollute more and burn more fuel because have to speed up and slow down.

    Diesel-Electric trains replaced direct drive combustion and steam locomotives decades ago for this reason.

    1. Re:Yes - Impact on the enviornment, but less by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

      and I'm sure you could get the Pollution lower by using Bio-deisel fuels.

    2. Re:Yes - Impact on the enviornment, but less by LordLava · · Score: 1

      Diesel Gas isn't any dirtier than regular gasoline. It's actually considered cleaner by some since the particulates tends to settle out of the air rather quickly (in minutes). regular Unleaded has a tendency to hang in the air.

    3. Re:Yes - Impact on the enviornment, but less by berniecase · · Score: 1

      This is what Western Washington University's Vehicle Research Institute did with one of their cars at competition recently. A buddy of mine is graduating this year and showed me the car last night. Pretty interesting concept and they use 100% bio-diesel rather than a mixture.

  22. Re:YES!! Finally!! by RAzaRazor · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yeah, it looks cool so you can pick up the chicks.

    But with no back seat, how are you supposed to get laid???

  23. Buy this technology today - it's VW! by jonbrewer · · Score: 3, Informative

    All you looking at the performance and gas milage of this car, have a look at what powers it. Sure there's an electric motor which gives you the fast 0-60, but if you look at the specifications page, you'll notice that all that electricity is powered by a Volkswagen TDI diesel engine.

    This is the 1.2 liter Lupo engine. Without the electric motor it gets 78 miles to the gallon anyway! Now while cars with this engine aren't sold in the US, one can purchase a Golf or Jetta with a slightly larger 1.9 liter TDI which makes 50 MPG, and generates between 90-115 HP. (with a torque peak of 155 lb. ft. @ 1900 rpm) 0-60 is a pathetic 10s, but 0-40 is a phenomenal ~4 seconds, which I find easily leaves a Subaru WRX or a BMW M3 in the dust.

    (Yeah, that's me in my diesel Golf playing "the fast and the furious" on the streets of Boston twice a day.) :-)

    1. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by istewart · · Score: 3, Informative

      The VW TDI is indeed a good engine. My family has 2 New Beetles here, both powered by TDIs. (BTW, the acronym stands for Turbocharged Direct Injection.) People are often surprised when I mention that the car has a turbo-diesel engine in it, with one person going so far as to say there was something wrong with my Bug because it was idling too loud. It's really all worth it, since I can make it from here to LA and back (~600 miles) without having to stop for fuel. The torque curve is also beneficial as well, for putting small dents in the self-esteem of a number of street racers. Interestingly enough, I saw a VW ad the other day marketing the Golf TDI as a performance vehicle, showing one about to get stopped by a highway patrol officer. Maybe they intend to take advantage of the engine's performance potential?

      In Europe, VW has a Lupo prototype made from lightweight materials that can do 130 MPG without a hybrid powerplant. I can't find a link offhand, but I believe I read that in Automobile magazine. With advances like these, I think these engines are a major force in the future of internal-combustion technology. (Interestingly enough, the state of California was offering tax breaks for people who bought TDIs, since they were considered a low-emissions vehicle. This was until VW stopped shipping TDIs into CA and NY state in 1999 due to more stringent environmental restrictions. Local dealerships have only begun to receive TDIs again in the past year or so...)

    2. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by Morel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now while cars with this engine aren't sold in the
      US, one can purchase a Golf or Jetta with a slightly larger 1.9 liter TDI
      which makes 50 MPG, and generates between 90-115 HP. (with a torque peak
      of 155 lb. ft. @ 1900 rpm) 0-60 is a pathetic 10s, but 0-40 is a phenomenal
      ~4 seconds, which I find easily leaves a Subaru WRX or a BMW M3 in the dust.

      If said vehicles are driven by Miss Daisy.

      BMW M3. 343 bhp. 365 Nm. 0-100 km/h: 5.2 seconds.

      Subaru WRX. 250 bhp. 333 Nm. 0-100 km/h: 5.9 seconds. (Original spec)

      Buddy, I don't think so.

    3. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      0-40 in 4 seconds? good luck doing that in the snow!!

      Seriously, that's pretty neat -- good torque at a really low RPM. Nice to see such a cool engine with such great mpg do well in acceleration, too. But, you may want to check out this 0-40 mph comparison:

      2003 Subaru Impreza WRX Sti Sedan (US spec) 2.5s hard launch /7.0s soft launch
      2001 BMW M3 2.8s hard launch /3.4s soft launch

      Also, I don't quite get your math... 0-40 in ~4 seconds, and then another 6 seconds to get to 60? Does it feel like the engine cuts out, or is there a different technique involved, or what is it that I'm missing? Actually, IIRC, the WRX is 0-60 in something like 6 seconds -- that scales similarily, so I guess its normal...

      and don't miss this neat WRX picture!!

    4. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were low-emissions vehicles, why did the more stringent environmental restrictions make VW stop shipping them to CA and NY?

    5. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by interiot · · Score: 2
      Maybe kinda sorta.

      WRX. 0-40 in 3.9s. Maybe. Such measurements can very by as much as 15% due to driver, ambient temperature and humidity, and height above sea level variations, so it's possible they can beat the WRX to 40 (though if the WRX does the 5000rpm clutch drop to launch, there's no way the Golf/Jetta can beat it, they just don't have the grip).

      M3. 0-40 in 3.4s. Okay, probably not.

    6. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by BadlandZ · · Score: 2
      Exagerations withstanding, your missing the point.

      Will the BMW or or WRX get over 50MPG?

      NO, the M3 get's 16 city, 24 highway. Dare to compare GALLONS per SECOND?

      Point being, just because it's high gas mileage doesn't mean it is a complete slouch in preformance. Compare ANYTHING to a M3 and you will see it is a decent preformer.

    7. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      You've gotta remember though that the TDI has its power in the low end, while the BMW and Subaru have the power in the high end. That's why the Volkswagen gets up to 40 quite quickly, but doesn't get to 60 quickly.

    8. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TDIs. (BTW, the acronym stands for Turbocharged Direct Injection.)

      No it doesn't, TDI stands for Turbo Diesel Intercooler, hence why you can get TD engines with no intercooler all diesel engines are injection, thats part of how they work.

    9. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's me in my diesel Golf playing "the fast and the furious" on the streets of Boston twice a day.)

      You have a DVD player in your car?

      Is is DVDCCA licensed?

      BTW, offtopic rant: I saw that stupid movie, and it doesn't even have Judas Priest's "Freewheel Burning" in the soundtrack. Every time I heard the title of that movie, it made me think of that song. But somebody wasn't thinking.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    10. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by njaneer · · Score: 1

      I suggest you first, ascertain the facts about the Lupo TDI MPG. It averaged 90+ MPG for the first 12,000 miles on it's around the world tour. Furthermore, a combined 260 Hp power plant is for Hybrids is remarkable to begin with. Considering that you only need about 15Kw of energy to mainatin a velocity of 55 MPH, what do you do with the other 35 Kw the Lupo has remaining-why ofcourse, you enage in self-sustained battery recharge on-the-fly. I suggest you study up on Hybrid technology, before you comment on the solution stratedgy of this vehicle.

    11. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by istewart · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it was a set of rules specifically targeted at diesel engines, mainly the ones used in semi rigs and diesel locomotives (which, needless to say, AREN'T low-emissions). These rules didn't really affect the TDI's LEV status, they just made VW jump through more hoops to get the cars brought in. Rather than do this and tack an extra cost onto the price of the cars, VW decided simply not to import those cars into CA and NY until they worked something out with the state government.

    12. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by istewart · · Score: 1

      The "Direct Injection" refers to the fact that in this engine design, fuel is metered at the injector rather than the fuel pump. I believe that most newer diesels have switched to this design. Also, I don't even think the VW engine even has an intercooler, but I'm not sure.

    13. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by adamsc · · Score: 1

      The people who actually make the engines don't seem to agree with you:

      turbo diesel intercooler: 0 hits

      Compare to turbocharged direct injection

    14. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by berniecase · · Score: 1

      Well, this might not be exactly what you were talking about, but this is a VW concept that's designed to use only 1L of diesel per 100km.

      In other, American, words - 239mpg. And it's 4-wheeled two-seater.

    15. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      The stock Lupo 1.2 liter TDI engine does in fact make 78 mpg. (a conversion of the measure from liters per 100km) That's the official rating. When they did their "round the world" they were going at sub-highway speeds and doing everything under their power to conserve fuel. Just as the official rating for the US Golf/Jetta manual TDI is 49 MPG, it can be made to get over 60 MPG just by being careful.

      As for the "strategy" of the SDSU hybrid, there really is none. I took the time to read their pathetic website, and was disappointed that nothing innovative was going on.

    16. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Concept cars are worthless, I want a car I can buy. VW won't sell me that car for any amount of money, much less an amount I can afford.

      If this car costs $250,000, then I don't want it. It costs me about $4000 a year to keep my current truck (If I keep it for 5 years and drive as much as I do now, which seems reasonable). Even assuming I get 15 years from the car (reasonable, I live in the rust belt so the body will go long before that engine dies) I still can't afford it despite the low gas costs. Sell the same car for $10000, and I'll buy one, gas savings will pay for it in just a few years. I ran the numbers on a 50 mpg car, and they don't work out, but 200 mpg does.

    17. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by berniecase · · Score: 1

      Look, it's the fact that VW's doing it. I'm more confident that VW would release something in Europe than they would here, sadly, because Americans aren't willing to give up their gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks for more economical, and frankly, practical cars.

      Why won't the automakers in this godforsaken country make a hybrid SUV? I don't know, but I will tell you that if they did, you'd finally see an SUV that could get 30+ mpg on the highway, instead of 15. Throw in a TDI engine charging up batteries for an electric motor, and you've got a very nice powerplant, as well.

      There are some nice technologies already available that could make it possible to get better fuel economy in larger vehicles, such as TDI and constantly variable transmission.

      There's this misconception that all alternative-fuel vehicles have to be purple little bubble cars from Germany rather than real, usable machines. This is simply not true.

      Some of these technologies aren't cheap, but the more people adopt them, the lower the prices will get.

      I'm currently driving a '95 Jetta. Once it hits 150k miles, that car's going bye-bye, if I make it that far. My next car will be a TDI, unless something better is available by then. We shall see.

    18. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by berniecase · · Score: 1

      http://www.hybridford.com/index.asp

      I spoke too soon. It's a start, but I'd really like to see a Suburban, or Excursion with a hybrid powerplant.

    19. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Actually the US automakers are looking at Hybreds for SUVs. However they are not looking at a hybrid like you would think of it. They just want to put a small electric moter on each front wheel, and save the weight of 4 wheel drive, which is heavy. They should at least get a 4x4 with about the same milage as a 2 wheel drive equivelent if they do it right.

      Sounds good on paper, I don't know why I haven't seen them yet.

      OTOH, SUVs are generally better canidates for hybrid or all electric cars. They tend to have a large frame underneith (instead of unibody) with plenty of open space for batteries.

    20. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Also, I don't quite get your math... 0-40 in ~4 seconds, and then another 6 seconds to get to 60? Does it feel like the engine cuts out, or is there a different technique involved, or what is it that I'm missing?

      It's a diesel, so it makes lots of torque at low RPM, but doesn't have much of a top end (and therefore not as much power, since power is proportional to torque times RPM). So you get moving quickly, but after that the acceleration falls off. Diesels tend to work best in situations where you want high efficiency at a relatively constant speed - thus their use in electric generators, locomotives, long-haul trucks, etc. (Any why you don't see any diesel-powered 'Vettes, for instance.)

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    21. Re:Buy this technology today - it's VW! by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      Ah, that explains it -- thanks!

      That's interesting then.... the cool thing about a gas engine + electric motor is that, at 0 rpm, the gas engine has 0 torque, and the motor has full torque... as the RPMs go up, the gas engine gains torque and the electrice loses (up to a point, of course). The two assist each other,

      That would make it harder to do a diesel + electric motor combo in the same fashion (both motors driving the same axle) because it would get sucky high-end torque.

      Just an interesting story:
      Steam locomotives were popular because they could generate great torque at low rpms - no combustion was needed, so the pistons just filled with steam slowly. Gas engines couldn't replace the steam versions because you'd burn out the clutch in no time. It wasn't until the diesel+electric came out that steam faded away - unlike modern electric cars, the diesel drives a generator that drives a motor. No rotational energy from the diesel is coupled to the wheels. Thus, the diesel generates a lot of current at a speed it feels comfortable at, and the electric motor provides the massive torque @ 0 rpm. The generator-motor system acts as a clutch/gearbox.

      That system would be as good as the pure electric cars we have, except, of course, that they'd have better range. I wonder if the electric alone works well enough (to the general population), or if the gas engine is really needed to pass at highway speeds...

  24. pictures by supahdren · · Score: 2, Informative
    courtesy of your friendly neighborhood karmawhore, here are the pics:

    click here

  25. Dumbass by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Hybrid cars get their power from burning gasoline in a regular car engine. They just need to burn less of it.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  26. SDSU Prof. Thompson's death in auto accident... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... I see at that web site
    http://www.njaneer.com/
    That the Mechanical Engineering department chairman
    died in an automobile accident on April 23rd.
    I don't suppose he was driving their hybrid
    sports car design at the time, was he? Hope not.

    That car is awesome. Is it licensed for use on
    US highways? I hope a startup company runs with it
    and sells lots of them for low prices. We can wish.

  27. This is excellent by edo-01 · · Score: 3, Funny
    I have long suspected (half jokingly), as I am sure have many here, that the big car companies who have developed hybrid/alternate energy cars have deliberately made them look incredibly ugly to prevent anyone actually wanting to buy one.

    It's great to see one of these cars that actually looks cool, even if the models posing with the car don't.

    1. Re:This is excellent by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      The EV1 strikes me as being incredibly aerodynamic and therefore getting more miles per charge. PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume an enlongated sphere which comes to a point at the front and back is the most aerodynamic shape possible that holds any volume inside. Therefore all our cars should be bubble shaped. Unfortunately most of our eyes are drawn to cars that have defined "lines." Even the Miata and Corvette have lines of a mild sort, but the McLaren F1 gets our serious attention for styling.

  28. Are they really that efficient? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    How much hybrid efficiency is in the hybrid part and how much is light, aerodynamic car on skinny tires with some advanced engine technology?

    The Toyota Echo and the new Corolla have a similar VVT gas engine as the Prius, and Consumer Reports tests suggested that their real-world gas mileage was only marginally worse than the Prius.

    1. Re:Are they really that efficient? by fo0bar · · Score: 1
      The Toyota Echo and the new Corolla have a similar VVT gas engine as the Prius, and Consumer Reports tests suggested that their real-world gas mileage was only marginally worse than the Prius.

      If you looked at about 80% highway driving, 20% city, yes, the Prius is an Echo that costs $7k more. However, Prius users in a very urban area like San Francisco have reported 60-70MPG or more, since the gas engine is almost never used! The electric motor has the capability of reaching 47MPH without needing the gas engine (though painfully slow accelerating is needed, I've found that 23-25MPH is the "real world" threshold before the gas engine kicks in), so if you're not the kind of person who wants to get to the next red light, one block away, as soon as possible, you can get amazing gas mileage from a Prius.

      "Unfortunately", since my drive to work involves a small amount of city driving, some country backroads and a small highway trek, my gas mileage tops off at about 48MPG.

  29. You missed a lot actually ;-) by modme · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Cars (internal combustion engine) emit more nasty stuff than greenhouse gases - chemicals such as benzene, adversely affect human health.

    In fact, the two most carcinogenic substances known are emitted from trucks. Diesel fumes are generally considered 25 times more carcinogenic than cigarette smoke - we worry about some passive smoking in a bar, but have trucks/buses/generators blasting diesel into the air *WTF*?

    The comments of Dr. Paul Davies were even raised in the South Australian parliament - that more people die from exhaust emissions each year than speed and alcohol related road accidents!!!!!! Where is the TV advertising campaign "Drive a diesel engine - and you're a bloody idiot" !! :-)

    In terms of health hydrocarbons suck - to me it makes more sense to emit some extra C02 in order to make electricity for cars. Other than it's affect on global warming, C02 is relatively clean - its not unhealthy to breate - certainly compared to car emissions.

    Production of materials such as concrete produce obscene greenhouse gases, we could make a few less tons of that per year to compensate for the extra levels from electricity for cars :-)

  30. Drunk...cannot make sense of post...head hurting.. by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I've been saying this among friends for a while... the only reason that these early electric and hybrid cars all look like ass! "

    Arrrrggggghhh!!! Finish the sentence! What is this supposed to mean?

    -Tyler

    Vacuums really make my blood boil.

    --
    Happy people make bad consumers.
  31. Bumps? by Gregg+Alan · · Score: 1

    Not to be negative, but the front end doesn't look like it offers much in the way of shock absorbtion. Perhaps that's just a matter of the way I drive.

    It does look cool though.

    --
    Here before all but 8486 of you.
  32. Re:YES!! Finally!! by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

    Spend all the money you save on gas on a cheapo motel room... ;-)

  33. External Design as Promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't cost any extra to design/create a nice-looking automobile unless you want Pininfarina et all to put their name to it.

    Alternative (non-petroleum) fuels will take another 20 years to become affordable.

    You want to tip the balance, and H2/electrical cannot do it yet - too expensive and not enough power/range.

    Perhaps multi-millionaire movie stars should be forced by contract to be transported in "eco-safe" vehicles so that all us drones will follow suit.

    1. Re:External Design as Promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must cost something these guys couldn't afford. A monkey could design a stumpy Corvette.

      And what's with those stupid 1' x 1' x 2' doors? What's the point? You could climb in without them.

  34. Why can't all hybrid cars look like that? by Raunchola · · Score: 2

    IMO, one of the reasons why we don't see many of these hybrid cars on the road is because they look so damn stupid. Have you ever seen the Honda Insight? It looks like an old CRX, except it's more streamlined, and smaller.

    Let's face it, we all want a car that gets good mileage, but we also want a car that looks good too. If we all cared about gas mileage, we'd be driving Geo Metros. But we aren't, because they are ugly cars that are slightly larger than a Matchbox car, and they wouldn't hold up in a fender bender. Everyone wants a big vehicle...not 1975 Cadillac big, but big enough to make us feel safe and look good at the same time. Most hybrids out there lack in the second department.

    Auto manufacturers seem to be catching on, and they're starting to make hybrids of existing vehicles (the Honda Civic and Ford Escape come to mind). But they need to start cranking out hybrids of existing models that people like, or models that resemble the SDSU vehicle. Hell, I'd like to see a hybrid Volkswagen Jetta...not that they don't get good mileage as-is, especially if you have diesel. But that's besides the point. :)

    Until the auto manufacturers start doing that, I don't think we'll see any general acceptance of hybrid vehicles, because nobody wants to plunk down the money for a silly looking electric Matchbox car.

    --

    --
    The real Raunchola isn't cool enough to have any imposters
    1. Re:Why can't all hybrid cars look like that? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      How do you explain the Miata and new Beetle? Is it just because they're cute? They aren't all that safe, but then nothing is going up against a Lincoln Navigator.

    2. Re:Why can't all hybrid cars look like that? by BobTheBooser · · Score: 1
      Hell, I'd like to see a hybrid Volkswagen Jetta


      as an earlier post mentioned the disel engine is basicly the same as the Jetta's

  35. SD - In brief by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wheat, Corn, Buffalo, ammunition, firearms, cattle, dinosaur bones.

    South Dakota used to have 150 Minuteman missile silos, and B-52s. Now it has a bunch of B-1Bs

    There are 700,000 people there, 1 Representative, 2 Senators, 2 freeways, Mount Rushmore and the Corn Palace.

    1. Re:SD - In brief by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the world's largest petrified wood forest in lemmon.

    2. Re:SD - In brief by NetFu · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's about 800,000 people -- with all those 10 person families' kids leaving the state every year, they need the help (the population never rises even though the average family size is about 8).

  36. car crash was in Toyota RAV-4, not L3 Hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, it looks like SDSU faculty member Larry Thompson was not driving the L3 Hybrid when he crashed...

    From http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sandiego/
    ...
    Thomps on was on his way home after dining with friends from his doctoral days at UC Berkeley when he lost control of his Toyota Rav4 on a curve of Oak Grove Road, the California Highway Patrol said. The vehicle plummeted about 300 feet into a meadow. Investigators believe Thompson was crawling toward the embankment when he died, a CHP officer said.

    Both Thompson's wife and [Bruce Westermo] said Thompson helped the department recover from a shooting by a disgruntled graduate student in 1996 that left three engineering professors dead.

    Thompson joined the SDSU staff in 1981 after spending four years as a senior scientist at General Atomics. He earned a doctorate in material science and engineering from UC Berkley in 1978. Most recently he was working with graduate students to develop coatings for metallic materials that could determine any strain in the metal.
    ...

  37. Dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody said how cool an LabView dashboard is. I magine the fun you can have with dashboard hacking!

  38. Re:impact on the enviornment? Gas, not diesel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hybrid cars (in the United States of gAs) are gasoline engines. If the trucker unions wouldn't rise up against the government, we could get much cleaner diesel engines, which would make diesel/hybrids attractive.

    The problem with battery powered or hydrogen powered cars is where is the energy generation coming from? Sure, some areas will get their energy from cleaner plants, but if you're in a high density area (like the northeast) it's coming from coal plants that are going to f*ck up the environment even more.

  39. Doors? by jcsehak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are those doors or drive-in-movie trays? What is that, like 3 less inches you have to step over to get out? I say save money on hinges and go dukes of hazzard style.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Doors? by interiot · · Score: 2
      Reminds me of the Lotus Elise. In that car, the door sill actually doubles as an arm rest by design.

      As the uni designed this hybrid as a lightweight car, it wouldn't surprise me if they borrowed some design cues from the Elise (1600 lbs).

  40. Re:impact on the enviornment? Gas, not diesel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops, not just "much cleaner diesel engines" but much cleaner burning diesel fuel.

  41. Then there's North Dakota... by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which is smaller and has fewer residents than South Dakota... home of (you guessed it) wheat, barley, durum, sunflowers, and canola. 36 B-52's, some air refueling tankers, 150 Minuteman ICBMs.

    My roommate's from there... I quote "North Dakota? Heh... not much going on there. Heck, the largest city in North Dakota is less than half the size of Lubbock, Texas".

    1. Re:Then there's North Dakota... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      hey, North Dakota Rules!

      Screw you, buddahy

  42. Pretty sweet "CAVE"... by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    http://www.njaneer.com/cave_1.jpg

    Not really a CAVE, but the three projectors, curved screen, and the two pipe / 2x8 channel late model deskside Onyx2 makes it a "Reality Center". Not too shabby.

  43. Is it for Midgets? by saden1 · · Score: 1

    I mean really...it looks like a frigging go-cart.

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
  44. Re:YES!! Finally!! by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well, consider it a car of compromise.

    This vehicle is a hybrid, meaning that they couldn't go electric all the way.

    And since it only has two seats, you too get to experience the "Art of Compromise", and you too can't "go" all the way.

    Like a heroin addict gone to methadone instead of quitting cold turkey. Like a red meat eater only eating chicken and fish instead of going vegan. Like a virgin, touched for the very first time....

    No wait... that's right.. You don't get laid. All you get is Road Head. Behold the art of compromise!

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  45. Highest Concentration of Buried Data Cable by DaHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few years ago our jack ass governor (the one who for a time got rid of the adopt a highway program to keep a couple of gays from adopting a 2 mile stretch and who is currently in the middle of an embargo against the nation of Canada)... anyway... a few years ago he started a program of wiring ALL of the SD schools, public and private. For the last 3 years, every single grade school, middle school, high school and college have had AT LEAST a T1 as well as video conferencing rooms to allow students to take classes from remote sites... We continue to lay more and more cable and for the last few years have had more buried data cable per square anything then any place on earth. That... and we have a lot of corn!

  46. at least ND has good broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to all of the ND telcos being in cahoots, we do have some pretty decent broadband at decent prices. Pretty much every city has DSL, the larger cities also have cable modems and wireless. A few of the smaller towns have wireless access points high atop grain elevators (big silos) so folks out in the middle of nowhere can get something better than dialup. A cool new policy most of the telcos now have is "8 customers interested in DSL and well install the equipment, no matter how small the town". Typically high-test ADSL or SDSL in-town and Paradyne MVL "Reach" DSL for folks living up to 38K feet outside of town.

    And, like every other telephone prefix in the country, the telcos offer dialup for truly middle of nowhere or "grandpa" access.

  47. Uhh is that pic for real? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    It looks fake.. to me. Seems like the people are just placed in the image

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  48. dunno about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually... some people (myself included) prefer peace and quiet. I'm 70 minutes from Fargo and about 3.5 hours from Minneapolis. UPS and Fedex both deliver to my area, which is great as most of my purchases are made online anyway.

    I dunno about you, but I like it that way.

    And to the fellow talking about our telcos... I've been very happy since USWest/Qwest began to pull out of most of the smaller towns. Probably 90% of the state is served by locally-owned telcos and locally-owned-and-operated telephone co-ops. Great service, good prices, (and for the co-op area folks) a nice rebate check at the end of the year!

  49. Onboard computer specs? by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    I see that their onboard computer and even their dashboard is controlled by LabView. Any idea the specs are on the computer that's driving this? I'm curious as to the CPU/Ram and power supply choices.

  50. What about the FutureTruck competition? by jezzball · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm at Cornell, and several of my close friends are involved with the FutureTruck competition (http://www.hev.cornell.edu). Very very cool stuff - They've made a Ford Explorer with a Miata engine (turbocharged) and electric motor. Much more practical than yet another sporty car (which I think has been done better...witness the EV1, for instance).

    Go Cornell! Competition starts Monday! Go Big Red!

    --
    ls: .sig: File not found.
    (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)gnore?
  51. You're missing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The electric motor, with it's 200hp, is just there to get the car moving off-the-line, while the 1.2 diesel keeps it moving once the car reaches reasonable speeds.

    Most hybrid vehicles are the other way around, the engine is for acceleration, and the usually very weak (i've heard as low as 5hp) electric engine is used for cruising.

    It'll be interesting to see how this car performs in real life situations....

    oh, and unless you dropped a 5.7 V8 in your Golf only in your dreams do you reach 40 in 4 seconds with that thing ;)

  52. Re:star wars?? by NickRob · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Please explain.

  53. Re:Early post for CLIT... SUCK IT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    clam fucker!

  54. Some questions by heideggier · · Score: 1
    Nice to see cars like this in development, since they are the way of the future if emission laws follow the current trends, I think that this will end up being a public health issue afterall if they can ban smoking in the workplace why can't they do somthing about the smog, since it amounts to the same thing. However I do have some questions,

    Firstly, why use a dual engine design? couldn't the gas engine simply be used to power a generator? it being more effiecent to tune a engine to run at a constant RPM. Just have a large electric motor and a small gas motor.

    Why is it that all the hybrids I've seen thus far seem to just piggy back a electric engine on a motor cycle engine and make the car weigh in at 2 kilo's. Couldn't the electric motor be part of the weel assembly since it is, after all, only kicking in on the low torques.

    Finally, Why use petrol and not natural gas or some other alternative fuel, If you make the tank the standard size then you should be able to get around the "not having enough gas stations problem" which holds these types of fuel back? Since you aren't constantly filling the thing up.

    --
    Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
    1. Re:Some questions by allanj · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firstly, why use a dual engine design? couldn't the gas engine simply be used to power a generator? it being more effiecent to tune a engine to run at a constant RPM. Just have a large electric motor and a small gas motor.


      First of all, large electric motor => large batteries => expensive, heavy and takes a lot of space => not suitable for a normal-looking (or in this case, great looking) car. Because if it didn't have large batteries, the range would be very limited - the small gas engine would not be sufficient to keep the battery charged. This depends on HOW small we're talking here, but if it needs to be large enough to basically deliver all the power for the electric motor, it would be wiser, energy-wise, to forego the generator and have the gas engine run the wheels directly, since even the best generators have noticeable losses of energy.

      Second, the idea is to have the two engines do what they each do best. The electric motor keeps it humming along the highways at cruise speed (where little power is needed), and the fuel one delivers the power to accelerate (where more power is needed). So you get the best from both worlds.


      Finally, Why use petrol and not natural gas or some other alternative fuel, If you make the tank the standard size then you should be able to get around the "not having enough gas stations problem" which holds these types of fuel back? Since you aren't constantly filling the thing up.


      The idea seems to be that using ordinary fuel will speed acceptance. No Joe Sixpack will want a natural gas engine if he THINKS there's not going to be a gas station within range wherever he goes. The hybrid car presented in the article is really just another fuel burner with a really impressive miles/gallon figure, so there is nothing more to worry about than what to do with the gas money saved :-)


      Personally, I can't wait for this type of car to reach my country, where fuel is $1/liter. If only they'll put this style of engine in a more usable size car (say, one that can hold my family of soon-to-be 5 persons) and still reap the benefits of a hybrid engine. No wonder my country is the place in the world where 33 km/l VW Lupos are most popular :-)

      --
      Black holes are where God divided by zero
    2. Re:Some questions by heideggier · · Score: 1
      Second, the idea is to have the two engines do what they each do best. The electric motor keeps it humming along the highways at cruise speed (where little power is needed), and the fuel one delivers the power to accelerate (where more power is needed). So you get the best from both worlds.

      Point in fact, if dual engine designs are so fucking great will all be using them already, ie on engine for with a large displacement for torque and a smaller engine for the highway, it isn't a new idea, I think some of the grand prix cars of the fortys had two engines. I think the problem is one of reliablity since you now have to maintain two engines instead of one.

      Anyway why make shit so complex, just have a small turbine engine to generate power for an alternater to a larger full electric motor.

      --
      Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
  55. Fuel economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't want engines that purr quietly. We want engines that ROAR.

    Who's going to want to drive a Dodge Viper, or [insert-automaker's name here] SUV with a puny little engine like that.

    So, outside of California, who really cares?

  56. I helped work on the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey all, I am a engineering student at SDSU, and although I didn't help build the car, I designed the logos and graphics seen on the car. There aren't any current pics of the car with these logos, but hopefully soon. I finished them up right before we got out of school at the end of may, so I didn't get to see the final product on the car because I moved back home for the summer.

    For those wondering the CPU specs...it's running a 1ghz celeron. I dunno how much ram but I am assuming no more than 128-256. I talked with the main designer for awhile about his choice, and he said he didn't need much power in terms of CPU. I tried to convince him to let me build him something better, but he refused. oh well! later

  57. Re:I bet by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1

    they where not trying to rip off either Lotus Elise or the Electric Tropica ......

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  58. I helped work on this car! by Tenknics · · Score: 1

    Hey all, I am a engineering student at SDSU, and although I didn't help build the car, I designed the logos and graphics seen on the car. There aren't any current pics of the car with these logos, but hopefully soon. I finished them up right before we got out of school at the end of may, so I didn't get to see the final product on the car because I moved back home for the summer. For those wondering the CPU specs...it's running a 1ghz celeron. I dunno how much ram but I am assuming no more than 128-256. I talked with the main designer for awhile about his choice, and he said he didn't need much power in terms of CPU. I tried to convince him to let me build him something better, but he refused. oh well! later (sorry if I made other posts, this is my first time posting here, I messed up)

    1. Re:I helped work on this car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice that someone is finally selling hybrid-power computers. My computers are all power-sucking electric Athlons, and I must admit some envy for your more efficient gas-electric celeron.

  59. Argh! Slashdotted! by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Is the 0-60 and quarter mile time posted somewhere?

    Oh and it's a cute little death trap. Imagine what a Maibatsu Monstrosity would do to that thing...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  60. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Nakago4 · · Score: 1

    Umm ok I don't get it. Its a hybrid vehicle obviously designed for people who like sports cars. Sports cars never have back seats, or if they do they are so small as to be all but unusable anyway. So if you want a family car, don't buy a 2-seater.

  61. diesels are still very dirty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vw makes nice cars. It has great mpg, but its diesel? Diesel is still very dirty and the vw tdi have a 1 star rating when in comes to pollutants. For those that don't know, most gas station don't evern carry diesel. The whole idea is to pollute less! Which is what hybrids do.

  62. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many cars on American roads do you see that have more than one person in them anyway? Remember... this is the country where the carpool lane was born, but never filled...

  63. You can buy one... by amayhew · · Score: 1
    Or at least put a payment down for when it is available. But it sounds like it's not going to be cheap:
    "We expect a price somewhere between a Porsche and a Ferrari."
    All brought to you by the guys who supplied to electic side of the drivetrain, AC Propulsion.
  64. Re:get some goat! by andrea_dworkin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How dare you appropriate my sexual organ for your trollish patriarchal acronym! Your sig is cool though.

  65. British Hybrids by weycrest · · Score: 1

    We will see more Hybrids over the next ten years or so as the oil problem hasn't gone away and as supplies dwindle is likely to become poorer in quality. Pure electric cars are not pollution free. They only shift the environment problem to some huge nuclear or oil powered facility elsewhere.

    My father (who is now retired in France) worked on a number of Hybrid Vehicles about 15 years
    ago. A number of projects were built inluding a lightweight terrapin racing car, a hybrid based on the popular "Nova" kit car (if you dont know what these look like, one features in the film Cannonball
    Run II). Also a Hybrid Vehicle bus was built for the Manchester Passenger Executive. This eventially resulted in an EEC initiative to built
    a number of Hybrid Vans for local authorities based on the popular FWD Ford Escort mk III of the time. I dont know what happened to this project.

    Some of these early projects were let down slightly by the lack of availability of small efficient petrol engines but this has probably changed now but they were also powered by highly efficient lightweight permanent magnet
    disc motors which offered performance improvements
    over the heavy "milk float" motors being used in the electric vehicles of the time.

    Last time I checked the official uk gov web site Hybrid Vehicles made no mention of these developments, only those of Japanese and American manufacturers.

  66. Re:get some goat! by andrea_dworkin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You fucking rapist. When the Matriarchy takes over, I will personally remove your penis.

  67. Re:YES!! Finally!! by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    If the carpool lane was full of cars, it wouldn't be any faster than all the other lanes in the parking lot. The solution is carpool lanes filled so drivers can safely travel the speed limit.

  68. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a "Kit car" named the "riot" -- Originally designed to fit onto a VW Bug chassis. They didn't design it, just used it as a means of cost cutting.

  69. you actually think this looks cool..... by seb_sikora · · Score: 1

    ....in any way shape or form???? Well, i have to say, personally i disagree. It is good for a wierd electric car, but they need to make them look like internal combustion powered cars (normal ones). seb

  70. Here's some stiff competition. by Talkischeap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After having worked on several electric cars (conversions), and being 'into" electric/hybrid vehicles for well over two decades, I can say nice effort, nice lines, but when can we buy one that's affordable?

    And speaking of un-affordable, here's something pretty darn sweet that's been around since 1997.

    I like this TZero better because it can be a pure electric around town, and for long trips you just hook up their very cool 'Long Ranger' hybrid trailer, which allows for continuous highway cruising.

    And it's quick too!

    • 0 to 60 mph: 4.07 sec
    • 1/4 mile: 13.24 sec at 90 mph
    • Skidpad: 0.88 G
    • Range: 100 miles at 60 mph

    I want a TZero!

    --
    If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
    1. Re:Here's some stiff competition. by cronio · · Score: 1

      Yes! The TZero is awesome. Added to the fact that it performs incredibly well, it's also really cool because there is no gas-engine roar. Don't get me wrong, I love the roar of a high-power engine, but the cool factor of being able to beat a 'vette (or porsche) while the only sound you're making is the squeak of your tires is pretty damn high.

      Oh, and it uses a CVT (continuously variable transmission).

      --


      My plan is to pimp before they realize I'm a jackass. Hit 'em hard and fast.
  71. It sucks. by gTsiros · · Score: 1

    It has 4 wheels. I fskcing hate car. They are incredibly inneficient.

    They have 4 seats while take a look out your window, how many of them are ocupied? 4? 3? 2? Motorcycles are far more efficient at this.

    The tires have a LOT of friction. In fact, the sportier the car, the larger footprint these tires have, having more friction and demanding more horsepower to spin. Motorcycles are far more efficient at this, All of them have more or less the same very small footprint. The are is like the size of your palm.

    Driving , contrary to riding, is unintuitive. Yes, i said unintuitive. Riding is intuitive, because when you turn, your body goes with the turn, and doesn't go away. Also, you turn instictively, by looking at your path. This might turn for the bad tho, if you ever heard of "target fixation": there is an obstacle on your road which you want to avoid. if you make the kistake and look at it to avoid it... byebye...if you want to avoid it, you look at the PATH you want to take to avoid it. How long did it take you to find out just how much to turn the steering wheel so as not to go out of course? How long for the bicycle/motorcycle? there.

    Cars are space hogs. They are 3-4 times the size of a motorcycle.

    Mileage.

    Motorcycles don't collect crud under the seats, no way you lose a coin and try to find it (if you drop a coin while riding, you lost it for good!hehe). No way you can distract yourself by smoking/drinking/eating ice cream/reading newspaper (i've seen them all, you probably have seen worse)

    With motorcycles, traffic jams don't exist.

    Unless you don't dress properly (and contrary to common thoght you do NOT need to dress like an onion!!!there are very few specific clothes you need to wear, which are easy to remove.and they probably look cooler than a seatbelt.) you don't have to worry about rain/whatever.
    They are slower, less safe than motorcycles. (if you think i am getting insane on the "safer" part, do notice that i am talking about EVERYONES safety, not only the ones who is in the car but about those outside it.)

    The only reasons cars are better than motorcycles is because you can carry (where do you think "car" came from? "carriage". Yes, the thing with horses/cows) lots of stuff with them. And to carry your family. (if it has more than 2 persons , that is if you have children.*)

    Cars suck.

    (*:just so you don't think i am a misanthrope or something, i want to have kids (even if you hear me sya otherwise under some circumstances- i'm fickle) and the fact that i ride a bike won't hinder me from having kids.)

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:It sucks. by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

      It sucks. by gTsiros on Saturday It has 4 wheels. I fskcing hate car. They are incredibly inneficient.

      >> "They have 4 seats...

      The vehicle in the article has two seats.

      >> "...while take a look out your window, how many of them are ocupied? 4? 3? 2?

      And, I just looked out my window, and don't see any seats, occupied or not.

      >> "Motorcycles are far more efficient at this."

      Motorcycles are more efficient at what , you didn't say.

      >> "The tires have a LOT of friction."

      Good thing too, otherwise we would all be spinning and crashing into each other, eh? And motorcycles wouldn't be able to go around corners without falling over.

      >> "In fact, the sportier the car, the larger footprint these tires have, having more friction and demanding more horsepower to spin."

      Wow, you must be an real expert... now I know why those Top Fuel Dragsters have such huge rear tires, it's because of those high horsepower engines. I had no idea...

      >> "Motorcycles are far more efficient at this..."

      There you go again... more efficient at what?

      >> "All of them have more or less the same very small footprint. The are is like the size of your palm."

      Boy... you never seen a Harley rear tire have you? How small are your palms?

      >> "Driving , contrary to riding, is unintuitive. Yes, i said unintuitive. Riding is intuitive,...

      Oh yeah... riding is intuitive all right, you are such the expert. Below about 10mph, you turn the handlebars in the direction of the turn. After about 10 mph, you have to turn them the opposite direction! Truly 'intuitive' .

      >> "...because when you turn, your body goes with the turn, and doesn't go away.

      Good thing too, because you would fall off otherwise. Is that why we have seat belts in cars, to keep us in place when we go around corners? I always wondered about that...

      >> "Also, you turn instictively, by looking at your path.

      Man, I know what you mean... when I'm driving my sucky car, I always have to remember to drive around obstacles in my way too.

      >> "This might turn for the bad tho, if you ever heard of "target fixation": there is an obstacle on your road which you want to avoid. if you make the kistake and look at it to avoid it... byebye...if you want to avoid it, you look at the PATH you want to take to avoid it."

      You know... I was just thinking about that. Because motorcycles are so instinctive, everytime I rode mine and saw a pretty girl and looked at her, I wound up crashing right into them!!! Can you believe that? Now I don't have a motorcycle any more, because the court took it, and my motorcycle license away because of too much pretty girl target fixation. Now I have to drive a sucky car...

      >> "How long did it take you to find out just how much to turn the steering wheel so as not to go out of course? How long for the bicycle/motorcycle? there.

      Now that's a statement thats as clear as mud, if I ever saw one... but it makes perfect snese to me.

      >> "Cars are space hogs. They are 3-4 times the size of a motorcycle.

      Yeah, they sure are... there must be some kind of conspiracy thats prevented anyone from coming out with a car that can seat four, and still be as small as a motorcycle. Who do you think is behind it, the Japanese?

      >> "Motorcycles don't collect crud under the seats,

      I'll bet you 10 bucks you've never looked at the battery under your seat....

      >> "...no way you lose a coin and try to find it (if you drop a coin while riding, you lost it for good!hehe).

      Funny, when I dropped a quarter at the Golden Gate Bridge toll booth, I just bent over and picked it up.

      >> "No way you can distract yourself by smoking/drinking/eating ice cream/reading newspaper (i've seen them all, you probably have seen worse)

      Oh man... I've seen worse. You don't even want to know....

      >> "With motorcycles, traffic jams don't exist.

      What planet did you say you came from...

      >> "Unless you don't dress properly (and contrary to common thoght you do NOT need to dress like an onion!!!

      Boy! Am I glad about that... I used to get the weirdest looks around barbeque season...

      >> "...there are very few specific clothes you need to wear, which are easy to remove.and they probably look cooler than a seatbelt.)

      I must really be out of touch, when did seatbelts become a fashion accessory?

      >> "you don't have to worry about rain/whatever.

      Ah yes... I remember the days when I didn't worry about rain/whatever, but now that I have to drive a sucky car, I worry all the time. Do you think that's why road rage is so common?

      >> "They are slower,

      Yeah... my sucky car is sooooooooooooo slow, I can't even stand it!

      >> "...less safe than motorcycles.

      I'm not so sure about that one... I mean... when I stop and forget to put my foot down in my car, it doesn't fall over...

      >> "(if you think i am getting insane on the "safer" part, do notice that i am talking about EVERYONES safety, not only the ones who is in the car but about those outside it.)

      Think you can run that one by us again?

      >> "The only reasons cars are better than motorcycles is because you can carry (where do you think "car" came from? "carriage". Yes, the thing with horses/cows) lots of stuff with them. And to carry your family. (if it has more than 2 persons , that is if you have children.*)

      But wait... cars suck. You just said so... Oh, I get it now... cars suck until you have to carry something big, then they don't suck. Gotcha chief....

      >> "Cars suck.

      Are you speaking from personal experience, I mean did you actually get your (GASP) organ stuck in a carberator or something once?

      >> "(*:just so you don't think i am a misanthrope or something, i want to have kids (even if you hear me sya otherwise under some circumstances- i'm fickle) and the fact that i ride a bike won't hinder me from having kids.)

      Well... after reading your fine post, all I can say is.......... BUMMER .

      --
      If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
    2. Re:It sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you get into an accident at 15MPH, you might survive, but your Johnson will be left on the seat.

      The most common surgery performed on Male Motorcyclists who survive is to re-attach their member...

      Sounds pretty safe to me!

    3. Re:It sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The only reasons cars are better than motorcycles is because you can carry (where do you think "car" came from? "carriage". Yes, the thing with horses/cows) lots of stuff with them. And to carry your family. (if it has more than 2 persons , that is if you have children.*)

      Car is short for carburetor, not carriage, and while you're trolling, get an education. Have fun on your donorcycle.

    4. Re:It sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be totally drunk.

      My uncle would be alive if he that old wooden fence in a car. I don't think I need to add anything to that.

  72. Lotus Elise rip off ! by spamtastic2 · · Score: 1

    Lotus already did this ages ago. They took an Elise and converted it. Geeks might be interested to know the elise has a bonded extruded aluminium chassis, weighs less than a mini, does 0-60mph in 5.6 seconds (with an untuned 1.8litre 4 cylinder engine), and is rated as being one of the best handling cars on the planet ! Pics of mine here

  73. I'll keep my Ford Expedition thanks... by ChristopherMarlowe · · Score: 0

    Safety is my number one consern, followed closely by my pride in buying a quality American product. This hybrid car looks like a total tin can. The odds are that I will suvive an accident in my Expedition, and not this hyrbid; or even some flimsy european attempt at "safety".

    While Mercades and Volvo do offer very safe cars, pure gross tonnage is the ultimate factor in my decision to chose the largest vehicle that Ford offers. All the German engineering in the world can't compete with American know how and brute force.

    Furthermore, I don't see the problem with my SUV getting decent mileage at 14 MPG. If the extra money spent on gas buys me the comfort in knowing that me and my dog will be safe in an accident, then I will gladly fill up my tank every two days until there is an equally safe hybrid alternative.

    To deny me this right is to infringe upon my rights as an American to protect my family in the best manner possible. To argue against this, as many people do, is silly, as it ignores the tenets upon which America was founded over 200 years ago.

    1. Re:I'll keep my Ford Expedition thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I got a BIG semi with YOUR name on the front bumper... look for it.

    2. Re:I'll keep my Ford Expedition thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for burning twice as much fuel (and warming the planet twice as quickly) as everyone else. I hope the A/C in your truck still works.

  74. http://www.njaneer.com/hev_homepage/Norm%20&%2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent project. I just want to know one thing

    Why the hell does john romero get to drive all the cool cars!?

    http://www.njaneer.com/hev_homepage/Norm%20&%20D av e_1.JPG

  75. hybrids rule by carnut · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are just so many things I want to say about so many of the comments here that I don't know where to start.

    First off, I was at the 2002 Tour de Sol where this car was supposed to be the best car ever. All you have to do is check out the scores. The car from SDSU finished the race with -18 points. Yes, that is less than zero. Just showing up and filling out paper work earns some points. Where was all this 260hp performance? If you want to see some real student built hybrid vehicles check out Western Washington University's Vehicle Research Institute at http://vri.etec.wwu.edu. We have several hybrids. Some are conversions but we tend to specialize in the ground up design of real vehicles.

    Second, plugging an electric car into the wall is more efficient and cleaner than burning gasoline to power a generator. This is because it is easier to clean up the emissions from a large plant, it's all in one place, than it is to clean up the tailpipe of many cars that move all over the place.

    Third, diesel engines are more efficient than most other internal combustion engines. Those of you that think they are dirty and pollute the air more than gasoline engines are also wrong. You probably think of those city buses and heavy equipment belching black smoke into the air when you think of diesel power. That's only because those engines are not very well tuned. A well tuned diesel engine is just as clean as a well tuned gas engine.

    Finally, hybrids rule. You get the best of both worlds. Electric drive that is most efficient at low speeds and internal combustion power that is most efficient at cruising speeds. I have spent a couple years of my college carrer researching and building a hybrid vehicle so it pains me to see people so uninformed about what is happening to the cars of the future. Pure electric vehicles are not generally accepted by consumers since you have to plug them in every night or you don't get to work the next day. Fuel cells require gaseous hydrogen. When is the last time you went to the corner refuelling station and found hydrogen? Hybrid vehicles use technology for a sustainable future.

    1. Re:hybrids rule by Thing+1 · · Score: 2
      Second, plugging an electric car into the wall is more efficient and cleaner than burning gasoline to power a generator. This is because it is easier to clean up the emissions from a large plant, it's all in one place, than it is to clean up the tailpipe of many cars that move all over the place.

      This gave me an idea: How about creating "power mats" that the owner parks the car over, which provide an inductive trickle charge to the electric-only car overnight?

      They could even provide "keys", encrypted, so other drivers couldn't steal energy (for, say, such a device buried in a driveway).

      The idea being, of course, to make the user experience more enjoyable/less frustrating.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  76. Great cars and can tell the future... by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    "On April 23 2002, Dr. Larry Thompson was tragically killed in an auto accident."

    Unless this is a joke I feel sorry, and am sorry for the friends and family of this man... but dammit they can tell the future well!

    1. Re:Great cars and can tell the future... by burgundy · · Score: 1

      Temporal dyslexia, maybe? April. May. June. Here's a news story about the event: http://advancement.sdsu.edu/marcomm/news/clips/Arc hive/Apr2002/043002/043002larry.html

    2. Re:Great cars and can tell the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      You have confused future with past. Predicting the future is about knowing things that will happen after now, in the direction we're going. Knowing the past (the direction we're coming from) is less impressive.

      Let me help clear up this future vs past thing, since it can be confusing.

      When you posted that, my reply post was the future. You probably didn't know that I was going to condescendingly flame you. If you did know, that would be predicting the future.

      When I posted this condescending flame, your post was in the past. I didn't "predict" that you would say something stupid in the future; I was looking into the past, which is easier.

      Hope this helps.

  77. Re:YES!! Finally!! by xdroop · · Score: 2
    You are refering to the college dimentions of a car, "f--- room" and "beer room", right? Well, consider these two lessons from the real world:

    You can have sex with a real live girl in an envelope if you both want to. Back seats are nice, sure, but not mandatory.

    Any car on the planet -- even a Citroen 2CV -- can hold more beer than you can.

    --
    you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
  78. Maibatsu Monstrosity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm a mom, not a conservationalist"

    GTA3 rules :)

  79. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing beats a Firebird! :)

  80. Re:YES!! Finally!! by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

    Better performing if you don't mind stopping to recharge every 100 miles. The appeal of hybrids is that you never plug them in, as the IC engine recharges the electric doohickeys or whatever. I'm all for true electric cars, but the infrastructure to make them useful to most people simply doesn't exist. Maybe someday, but not yet.

  81. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How many cars on American roads do you see that have more than one person in them anyway?


    You don't see the other person in the car because she's down giving head. :)
  82. Re:YES!! Finally!! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    If the car pool lane was full, another carpool lane would be added.

    By the the time you have two full car pool lanes (half of your highway) with on average tripple the amount of people you have essentially doubled your roads capacity (2*3) + 2 = 8 apperent lanes. I would imagine there would be signifigantly less traffic jamming if the road had the capacity of a 16 lane highway.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  83. New Slogan by EonBlue · · Score: 1

    new slogan: "coolest looking car to get smoked by a ford focus"

  84. Re:YES!! Finally!! by milenko11 · · Score: 1

    You are also forgetting that this is Slashdot and that 99% of the people here wouldn't get to use a backseat even if it did have one.

  85. You'll notice... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    That this plastic-looking car here on slashdot ALSO used disel as it's fuel component. I'd be more worried about saftey in both cars than anything else.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  86. In memory of Dr. Larry Thompson, 1952-2002 by millette · · Score: 1
  87. this is a VW body kit ... been around for 6-7 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They built this from a stock VW fiberglass bodykit from thunderanch's Riot car kit. Good use of it. total turn key used to be about $9000.00 for one of these from the manufacturer. They even had an appearance for a while on the TV show Babewatch with one of these. Glad to see that there are still some kitcar lovers out there taking things to new levels. For anyone interested http://www.thunderranch.com/riot.html is the link to the kit. Should not be to hard to duplicate what they have done ;)

    Spider

  88. Hell yea. I'd pay $20K for that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to buy a hybrid if:

    1. Someone would make one that doesn't look retarded. The Honda hybrid Civic is at least normal looking.
    2. It would let a 6'4" guy sit in one comfortably.

  89. Life of Batteries??? by doja · · Score: 1

    I've always been wondering this: how long does the battery last? I know in all of the rechargable batteries that I've had, the stored power decreases as the battery ages (for example, car batteries, laptop batteries, cordless phone batteries,...). Eventually they need to be replaced.

    How long can you expect to get good performance from one of these batteries?

    What is the impact on the environment when the battery goes bad and gets replaced, or the whole car gets junked?

    If a car gets into an accident, are we now going to have battery acid squirting all over the already f'd up victims?

    1. Re:Life of Batteries??? by Technician · · Score: 2

      Deep cycling batteries is hard on them. Laptops and cell phones are usualy run low when used, or are left on to charge most of the time, also bad.
      The Toyota Prius has an 8 year warranty on the battery. It's a Nickel Metal Hydride battery. It is designed not to be deep cycled. Running out of gas and going electric only is very hard on the battery.
      The electric provides short bursts of high torque for merging on freeways, climbing hills, stop and go city traffic, etc. Regenerative braking and the gas engine keeps the batteries up. Gently pulling away from a stop sign leaves the gas engine off until you reach about 10 MPH, then it starts using the generator. No gear grinding cranking noise from this one. The best thing about the Prius is the almost silent engine. It's totaly quiet at stoplights and you don't notice the engine when it starts because the small amount of road noise masks it.
      In short, I also like the car because I can enjoy my music in it. (Get the CD changer option!)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  90. Re:Drunk...cannot make sense of post...head hurtin by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    Sorry... thats what I get for posting in haste!

    It should read:

    "...the only reason that these early electric and hybrid cars haven't caught on is because they all look like ass!"

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  91. Design Ripoff by Transcendent · · Score: 2

    A while back i stumbled across a company called AC Propulsion. They built an electric car that has better acceleration than a farrari, porche, and others.... and it's funny that this new car looks just like it, but with tiny body kit...

    ...what do you think?

    http://www.acpropulsion.com/tzero_pages/tzero_home . tm

  92. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sure is one UGLY chick he picked up. Maybe he built the car like that so he doesn't have to get laid.

  93. The company that makes their electric motor... by rreay · · Score: 1

    The company that makes the electric motor their using is AC Propulsion, and they make a kick ass 100% electric vehicle with that same motor.
    -rr

  94. Reasons Iexcited about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like it A LOT. It's still not something I would buy, even if I could afford it because of the following:

    1. No A/C. It's frickin HOT outside.
    2. No coupe. I don't need the wind, sun and rain in the cabin. Not to mention the safety factors.
    3. I prefer a different color.
    4. No radio.
    5. No power windows.
    6. No power door locks.
    7. Someone would steal it and run it to Mexico on one tank of gas. ;)
    8. Who would fix it, when it breaks?

  95. Re:star wars?? by NickRob · · Score: 2

    I am

  96. *Pathetic* 10s? by aquarian · · Score: 2

    0-60 in 10s is faster than a BMW 5 series from the 80s, faster than many high priced sports cars from the 70s, and faster than many "muscle cars" from the 60s. Just because the average econobox smokes all of these now doesn't mean it's "slow."

    1. Re:*Pathetic* 10s? by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Because the average econobox smokes all of these, they are slow. Fast or slow is relative - if you drive your "fast" cars from the older days on today's roads you'll know what it means to be crawling.

      For sure when the Model-T came out people would say it was fast. It might be true at that time, but for sure not now.

  97. Too bad its done in flash by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Nice picture of the car thou, wish i could see the rest of the page.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  98. Setting the facts straight by njaneer · · Score: 1

    Greetings, I would like to set the facts straight to those who see this as a "Rip-off". The body was, in fact manufactured by Thunder Ranch. However, this is a one-of-kind mold that has undergone significant modification from the original. In fact, a computer model representing the topological changes is found on my website (www.njaneer.com). From those geometric specifications a new mold was created: It is truly a one-of-a-kind. Secondly, we have spoken to the original designer of the RIOT body (the one McBurnie appropriated) at the SEMA show this year in Las Vegas. Needless to say, this person is not too happy with Mr. McBurnie and to this day has remained persona-non-grata. Oh, and Mr. McBurnie has yet to supply the owner with a single royalty for using the body design. Our business dealings with him were horrendous. I recommend to all who care to listen not to affiliate their business with this organization. How they mange to stay in business, continues to leave me in perpetual state of incredulity. We will never conduct business with Thunder Ranch again. McBurnie may have dabbled with electric car technology, however, his frivolous efforts pale in comparison to the L3 technology. A 260 Hp, 80 MPG "True" Parallel hybrid electric vehicle with fly-by-wire technology is vastly superior to anything McBurnie has produced or, ever will. The mere mentioning of his efforts (or him period) in conjunction with ours, serves as a extreme injustice towards the Herculean effort that it took to design and manufacture an entire vehicle from the ground up with 6-8 students in a haphazard lab complete with antiquated equipment and a shoestring budget. If you must comment, try ascertaining the facts first. Sincerely, Design Lead and Vice President, L3 Research Inc.

  99. This one's pretty freaky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://awawa.sakura.ne.jp/ug/en/_html/awa140.html

  100. Goatse Man's Wife in Training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here

  101. Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean
    here.

    http://awawa.sakura.ne.jp/ug/en/_html/awa150.htm l

  102. L3 Enigma by njaneer · · Score: 1

    Greetings, As far as our innovative technology is concerned, a majority of it is proprietary and not for public consumption--that is why the website is restricted in its information content. As far as your (jonbrewer) heterodox facts pertaining to the Lupo are concerned: at the time the car reached Washington, DC, after driving 12,116 miles from Berlin, the cumulative average fuel usage was 95.2 mpg (2.47 l/100 km). In addition, yes, they were maintaining an average of 87 KPH or around 55 MPH: A variable in the standard driving cycle, which is officially recognized as the speed from which vehicles are rated for fuel economy. The 78.7 MPG was achieved after 20,712 ROAD miles. I would say, that no matter how you identify with these facts, it is impressive on any level. True, the website is short of a professional grade. However, for free--it seems to the job. In fact, it works so well, that it continues to echo a societal perspective that is purblind at best regarding Hybrid technologies . For your edification, the website was produced by an individual who volunteered his time to work on something that he could clearly see was great--he was not a webmaster but, had the minimum skills to contrive a functional site when we needed it. Your nescience opinion regarding our technology does not surprise me. Having worked on this project for three years as the design lead, my experiences with the public have demonstrated unequivocally that people are quick to point out the mistakes, misfortunes and failures of others. Neither capable of understanding nor able to engage in a similar endeavor, they dignify those who represent a passion to do things great at any cost, with languid dogma and a short sightedness. I am sure my synopsis falls short of being considered a raconteur but, I find it rather troublesome that comments such as yours are not alone. We are nothing more than a group of individuals that set out to do what "they" said could not be done. The PNGV had 10 years to achieve this milestone, and they failed. Now we have an administration who thinks fuel cells are the answer--in twenty years, maybe. Nevertheless, for now we need an interim solution, the L3 Enigma (I purport) represents just that. In closing, my prolix aside, a demonstration of the L3's capabilities would end all incredulity in this matter. Furthermore, it would unequivocally demonstrate that our "strategy" is truly unique and a technology to be recognized. Regards, Design Lead, L3 Enigma

  103. Re:YES!! Finally!! by njaneer · · Score: 1

    Yea, the VCR cost a $1000 when it first came out. You need to pick another planet to orbit around.

  104. That was one of the biggest challenges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The "startup" engine wear problems you are concerned with are caused by two factors - operation at excessively low speeds, and operation of the engine when cold (the unequal rates of expansion and contraction of individual engine parts causes everything to fit poorly when cold).

    Here's how we solve these problems: when you start up your Prius, you don't wind a starter and listen for the engine to catch. You just turn it on. If the gas engine is not required, it won't start up. If it is needed, it will start.

    By using an electric motor vastly larger and more powerful than a typical starter engine (and eliminating the "bendix" and associated gear wear incidentally) we take the engine to running speed immediately - there is no prolonged "wind-up" scraping dry rings across dry cylinders at speeds too low to effectively deliver oil from the lubrication system.

    If the system is cold when you turn the key on, the gas engine will immediately ignite and run until everything reaches optimum temperature, regardless of any other factors. This warmup is assisted by electric heater elements in various places; as you can imagine, the Prius often generates more electricity than it can store or use (think of going down Bootstrap Hill or Nittany Mountain) so there are resistive heater elements available as dump loads for the excess energy.

    By bringing the engine up to operating heat very rapidly (and monitoring and maintaining that temperature) we control the problem of tolerances - more efficiently, in fact, than your average gas-only vehicle, which has no electric heat elements to assist.

    If the system is already hot, you turn the key and nothing happens. Well, the LCD display lights up and your POST and network diags run, but nothing noisy happens. A side effect of this is that it's physically impossible to do that thing where you engage the starter of an aready running engine? Yeah, whatever that's called. Talk about your startup wear!

    Empirically, it works. Theoretically, well, I think the theory was developed to explain success after the fact, like so much of science and engineering.

  105. Re:YES!! Finally!! by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    Sure, it looks attractive, but unless there are some major support beams underneath, I won't ride in it. I'm a firefighter for Moorland township in Michigan, and I've seen cars torn in half by collisions.

    Most cars today are of unabody construction, meaning that what you see of the car is actually what holds it together. Looking at that photo link, I can't easily imagine that car holding together in a head-on collision. Even if it did, it'd probably fold over the top.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  106. Hybrid vs. Traditional civics by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I'm currently driving a 2001 Civic HX CVT (non-hybrid) and averaging around 36mpg. (They claim 40, but we all know that the claims are always high.) The new hybrid civic claims 50+ mpg, and while I don't expect it to hit 50, I imagine it will do better than my conventional civic, despite having the same conventional body parts as all the other civics.

  107. Good point, but only sometimes. by raygundan · · Score: 2

    This depends on the design of the hybrid system and what type of transmission is used. I think the design you're referring to uses the electric motor as the main drive, and a small gas engine to charge the batteries as needed.

    As far as I know, none of the available hybrid automobiles are doing this. Honda uses a simpler design, where the main drive is a gas engine, with a small electric "assist" motor. The Insight and Civic are never running electric-only, and use their gas engine traditionally. The electric motor acts as a booster to give you more acceleration.

    The Prius is more complicated, and allows electric-only driving. However, the main gas engine is still used to directly drive the wheels.

    Now, the advent of CVT transmissions has produced some gains in this direction-- but they're not exclusive to hybrids. Because they're continuously variable, the engine rpm can stay relatively constant. My non-hybrid CVT civic has a couple of spots on the tach that it prefers-- somewhere around 2000 for cruising, and much higher for acceleration.

  108. Re:YES!! Finally!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >But with no back seat, how are you supposed to get laid???

    If you are asking this question....I suspect the car won't help you.

  109. Hybrid Vehicles by GraniteGeek · · Score: 1

    Diesel-Electric Locomotives have been around for a long time now...it's a proven technology, combining power and economy. What is needed is a one-ton GMC Suburban with a diesel-electric powerplant combination that gets 100+ MPG...I'll say that much for the hybrid in the article, at least they are using diesel technology which is already more economical than gasoline. Most of the current hybrids while impressive for their "fuel economy" are not very "fuel efficient" which are two very different concepts. Fuel economy being "cheaper to fill up" while fuel efficiency would have to take in the passenger capacity, cargo capacity, weight, and other factors to determine what you are getting from the vehicle for your fuel dollar.

    --
    "It is better to light one tiny candle, than to curse the darkness..." - Confucius