Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Exhibit at LinuxWorld Expo

Earendil writes "Linux Today has a confirmed report that Microsoft is going to be an exhibitor at LinuxWorld Expo. One can only guess at what Microsoft's motives might be. It will be interesting to see the reaction to the appearance of a Microsoft booth." No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

239 of 756 comments (clear)

  1. What's the exhibit? by Nijika · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh oh, I know, a broadcast floos of NetBIOS and ActiveDNS requests on the exhibitors LAN!!!

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:What's the exhibit? by GodInHell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      FUD, .net, their 'rent our code' initiative, and of course, details about their enterprise wide lisencing schemas in order to properly confuse education IT pros and such forth that are finally looking at an open source solutions as a sincere posilbility.

      There are some things I fear though;
      1) A MS Distro with proprietary libraries and a proprietary office product
      2) officially renting a floor space in order to be able to make official complaints regarding the 'competitions' advertising practices.
      3) They want to Buy you. Not win you over, not get you to trust them, straight up, here's a free copy of XP, try it out. I've seen this at the chicago CIO conference, where it was brutally succesful.

      Of course.. we all know what will really beat MS in the long run, better pr0n harvesting utilities... at least if the succesful net sites are anything to go by.

      -GiH
      Foot, meet mouth, mouth mrrphrmmm...

    2. Re:What's the exhibit? by JordoCrouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      3) They want to Buy you. Not win you over, not get you to trust them, straight up, here's a free copy of XP, try it out. I've seen this at the chicago CIO conference, where it was brutally succesful.

      Not to offend you, but your average CIO would be won over by one of those pens with a the lady whose clothes disappear when it is clicked. A CIO confrence is a long shot away from LinuxWorld.

      And anyway, whats wrong with free copies of XP? Most hacker and porters I know end up needing a copy of Windows anway, and I would much rather receive a free copy than have to pay $100, know what I'm saying?

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    3. Re:What's the exhibit? by DutchSter · · Score: 2
      3) They want to Buy you. Not win you over, not get you to trust them, straight up, here's a free copy of XP, try it out. I've seen this at the chicago CIO conference, where it was brutally succesful.
      Nothing beats when they came to my college for a .Net dropoff. Total retail value of what each participant got was over $1,200 bucks. Everyone got a fully licensed version of XP Pro, .Net Pro, Office XP Pro, for starters. All the departments were given XP Server, and the school got XP Enterprise Server (or whatever the top end version is).

      Sad thing is, 95% of the people went strictly for the free software. I went because I was interested in how .NET worked (I wasn't overly impressed). Everyone else was just there for the free stuff. Heck, even more than 75% of those that weren't CS majors. Even if they threw .NET out, they still made out like bandits.

      MS: *Bink* :)
    4. Re:What's the exhibit? by flacco · · Score: 2
      Nothing beats when they came to my college for a .Net dropoff. Total retail value of what each participant got was over $1,200 bucks. Everyone got a fully licensed version of XP Pro, .Net Pro, Office XP Pro, for starters. All the departments were given XP Server, and the school got XP Enterprise Server

      Whas it the intravenous kind or the smokeable kind?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  2. Their display will consist of... by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny

    No doubt that their display will consist of Linux running on an Xbox.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Their display will consist of... by Khalid · · Score: 5, Funny

      They probably want to win the 200000 $ grant :)

    2. Re:Their display will consist of... by snilloc · · Score: 2

      It's not so much that they need the $200k, but much more important that they take away the monetary incentive for production of Linux on XBox.

  3. I don't really get it by iONiUM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a linux expo? I mean, I have nothing against Microsoft, but I'm pretty damn sure they don't have a linux distrobution (God forbid the day of a "Microsoft Linux").
    Anyways, I guess they're just going to try to show the competition.... but that makes absolutely NO sense because, again, it's a LINUX EXPO.

    1. Re:I don't really get it by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny
      ""Microsoft Linux" You realize that this is inevitable though?"

      Haven't you heard the news?

    2. Re:I don't really get it by NickV · · Score: 2

      this is a spoof site, right? Please?

      With hot topics on the upper right hand corner like "Microsoft Invades Cuba" and "Microsoft Monkey Colony on Mars," what do you think?

      Of course it's really silly!

    3. Re:I don't really get it by flacco · · Score: 2
      It's a linux expo? I mean, I have nothing against Microsoft, but I'm pretty damn sure they don't have a linux distrobution

      Forget about it, they just came to shit in the punch bowl and try to get a couple school-kids high.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    4. Re:I don't really get it by dimator · · Score: 2

      That would be one way to squander their billions, and end up in the same league as RH or VA.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  4. Childish by Wrexen · · Score: 5, Funny

    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Hi pot, this is kettle. You're looking mighty black today!

    1. Re:Childish by albalbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What annoys me more is the insinuation that if you don't behave as if Microsoft would be welcome, then you're being childish. I don't see any reason why we should welcome the poster-child of proprietary software to a GNU/Linux show.

      --
      "Elmo knows where you live!" - The Simpsons
    2. Re:Childish by neuroticia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er. Why wouldn't MS be welcome? I mean, of COURSE they're going to come with something Linuxey. I mean. They know that if they try to show MS Windows there they'll be lynched. >=]

      Honestly, though. Other proprietary vendors are welcome. (Think Maya, XSI, and a variety of other software vendors) Yes, MS is a bit over the top but... If they develop something for Linux why shouldn't they be welcome?

      Note that "Welcome" is hinged upon their developing something for Linux, and "Unwelcome" would be their showing up as the KKK at an African American march. Preaching "Open Source is Evil" would be bad manners and quite likely be met by geekily violence.

      -Sara

    3. Re:Childish by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      tripe?

      I dont think that word means what you think it means....

    4. Re:Childish by BrerBear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, Microsoft would NEVER do anything childish.

      From Wired News October 6, 1997:

      Much mirth was had in Mountain View on Wednesday when a certain party favor from the previous night's launch event for Microsoft's Internet Explorer 4.0 landed on the lawn of Netscape's world headquarters. As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle and elsewhere, the giant "e", (which was subsequently decorated by Netscape employees with a Mozilla doll) was surreptitiously transported from the San Francisco waterfront site of the launch party down the Peninsula by a group of unidentified Microsoft employees, and precipitated a pissing match between Microsoft and Netscape spokespersons over how sophomoric the prank was. What's being covered up in all this, of course, is exactly how high up the Microsoft command chain the conspiracy extended. It's not as if anyone's asking, "What did Bill Gates know, and when did he know it?" But we can tell you that many key, senior members of the IE team were co-conspirators. Indeed, there are even reports that the president of a Seattle-area company best known for its major-media-brand Web sites was among the crew joy-riding on the flatbed wielding the "e."

    5. Re:Childish by pr0t3uS · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...why we should welcome the poster-child of proprietary software to a GNU/Linux show."


      Because we are open and free comunity! Let's show them (M$) that we are diferent then they are and don't exclude them or think of them as a threat which they are not. Why they would not be welcome? They will come to "our" house so let us behave like good hosts. Let them show that we can live with them if they can live with us. If they will insult us just show them the way out but let's not insult them for no reason.

      Respect your enemies and newer underestimate them.
    6. Re:Childish by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      I dont think that word means what you think it means....

      tripe
      1: lining of the stomach of a ruminant (especially a bovine)
      used as food
      2: nonsensical talk or writing [syn: folderol, rubbish, trumpery,
      trash, wish-wash, applesauce, codswallop]

      Somehow I doubt he meant the inside of a stomach...

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    7. Re:Childish by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know the guy that mooned Bill Gates during his keynote a few years back at Comdex. They've got a great shot of it somewhere, I should try to find it.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    8. Re:Childish by prockcore · · Score: 2

      "Hi pot, this is kettle. You're looking mighty black today!"

      Of course you don't realize that slashdot is a stainless steel pot.

    9. Re:Childish by WNight · · Score: 2

      Nobody. The people who own MS stock are desperately praying that nothing happens to stop Microsofts stock price from rising.

      The people who actively oppose Microsoft are hoping their stock price will plummet to punish the asses who support illegal activities simply because they own stock.

      I doubt there's much overlap at all.

    10. Re:Childish by kcbrown · · Score: 2
      Because we are open and free comunity! Let's show them (M$) that we are diferent then they are and don't exclude them or think of them as a threat which they are not.

      They are a threat. Haven't you been keeping up with the news? They're a key player in the attempt to force DRM into the PC hardware architecture (the DRM architecture in question would prevent you from loading an operating system that wasn't signed, at least indirectly, by one of the root certificates. That means no Linux).

      Even if "unencumbered" x86 hardware were available (as in, systems running CPUs that don't have DRM built-in), that hardware will be a lot more expensive, because only servers would need such hardware, right? And you can bet the CPU manufacturers will charge a lot more money for the unencumbered CPU than the encumbered one.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    11. Re:Childish by jaffray · · Score: 2
      Why wouldn't MS be welcome? I mean, of COURSE they're going to come with something Linuxey.
      RTFA. "Right now, exhibitors at the Microsoft booth are planning on demonstrating products which feature Microsoft's Windows XP embedded technology. Houston emphasized that they have made great strides in the embedded space of late and Microsoft is eager to demonstrate those products to the attendees of the LinuxWorld Expo."
    12. Re:Childish by hayden · · Score: 2
      ... quite likely be met by geekily violence.

      Fear the geek with the grudge. Bad body odour and modified nerf guns are our tools (and we have the largest population of tools seen, not counting Eminem concerts).

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    13. Re:Childish by mpe · · Score: 2

      The people who own MS stock are desperately praying that nothing happens to stop Microsofts stock price from rising.

      Or at least don't fall as quickly as the rest of the US stock market :)

  5. I wonder... by T3kno · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does mooning their booth make the community look bad?

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    1. Re:I wonder... by ender81b · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does mooning their booth make the community look bad?

      That depends. Since most geeks don't have ass's like britney spears I am very much betting it would make the community look bad. Nobody wants to see hairy ass, nobody.

    2. Re:I wonder... by warmcat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually the goatsex guy would probably give it a go.

    3. Re:I wonder... by ender81b · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can you imagine the consequences for the world if Britney's ass was hairy? The shock, horror - MTV talking about it all day every day. Oh the bright side we would still get to see her ass, hairy or no.

    4. Re:I wonder... by sgage · · Score: 2

      " I wonder what makes us so sure that Britney Spears' ass is NOT hairy. Has anyone on /. even seen her ass and is able to vouch that it is in fact hair free?"

      Where are my damned mod points when I need 'em! ROFLM(H)AO!

  6. Dunking Booth by simetra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bill G in a dunking booth. That would be funny.
    Their theme could be "Hugs, not Hurts."

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  7. I can't wait... by bahamat · · Score: 4, Funny

    to see what the more childish among us do!

    1. Re:I can't wait... by alienmole · · Score: 2

      I agree - as Brian Aldiss said, "When childhood dies, its corpses are called adults."

    2. Re:I can't wait... by teslatug · · Score: 2

      I can imagine: http://www.bitstorm.org/gates/

    3. Re:I can't wait... by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

      You mistake being _childish_ for being _childlike_. If you take a wild pleasure in running through the sprinklers in the park or in splashing in puddles in the rain, that's _childlike_, and there's nothing wrong with that. If you get your jollies hurling bricks through windows or (as is likely to happen in this case) heckling and name-calling the underpaid, harassed Microsoft employees staffing the booth at the conference, that's _childish_ and you deserve to have your ears boxed.

      There is such a thing as courtesy. Your parents might have taught you about it.

      hyacinthus.

  8. Embrace and Extend. by bigpat · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have finally assimilated them!

    1. Re:Embrace and Extend. by HeUnique · · Score: 4, Informative

      It could be...

      It could be also that they'll demo SFU 3.0 (windows Services For Unix) - which was actually Interix until MS bought them (it was a very nice product, although the stuff there was ancient - X11R5, etc..)

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
  9. Maybe Hell has frozen over... by srmalloy · · Score: 3, Funny

    And they're making Windows open-source...

    1. Re:Maybe Hell has frozen over... by Micah · · Score: 2

      MS Exchange server won't play nice with any Linux 'outlook like' display

      Uh, Ximian micah have something to say about that...

    2. Re:Maybe Hell has frozen over... by Micah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Odd as it sounds, I actually fully expect that to happen someday. It is ESSENTIAL to the future health of the technology industry that the de-facto platform that people use is open source, and people are finally starting to realize that.

      When the tidal wave of people switching to Linux hits -- and I do believe it will within the next couple years -- what else is Microsoft going to do? Their proprietary licenses just won't cut it. They will NEED to make Windows open source to keep control of the platform people use, to keep people from dumping it like a hot potato, and to make a market for their other products.

      Of course with OpenOfice.org, they'll even have trouble with THAT. :)

  10. Probably .NET by jsimon12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am sure they will be pushing .NET, with Mr Gnome following close behind. Oh well hopefully people will have sense to stay out of the clutches of the evil empire.

    Though being a huge corporation with mounds of cash they might just have some Hot Booth Babes .

    1. Re:Probably .NET by PovRayMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wonder if those booth babes will be wearing the tshirts you can find here...

    2. Re:Probably .NET by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2

      My wager goes with these things:

      - Hosting solutions (or something of that ilk). Its the focus of their two page ads in Linux Magazine each month.

      - Windows CE / XP Embeded.

      - Small footprint XP that was tuned for blades / black box server/SAN solutions.

      These are all areas where Linux is a credible short term threat to MS.

    3. Re:Probably .NET by awx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dunno, Ceren in a Borg suit would work for me. I'd have to spank her bottom for going to the Dark side though.

      Rawr.

      --
      Feel that power? That's mah MOUSING FINGER
  11. Redmond Linux by javacowboy · · Score: 2

    Hmmmm... so THIS is why Licoris decided not to call it "Redmond Linux" anymore...

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  12. The more childish among us??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Hey, Taco, have a look in the mirror, LEGO-boy.

    Oh, but don't forget to take off your Darth Vader helmet first.

  13. childish? by Pave+Low · · Score: 5, Insightful
    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    1. Re:childish? by alienmole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Using the Bill Gates borg isn't childish - aside from the fact that it communicates /.'s bias honestly and concisely, it also satirizes aspects of Microsoft's real-life conduct. Not so much childish as chillingly accurate.

    2. Re:childish? by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2, Troll

      > Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg.

      How about Gates as "Uncle Pennybags" from the Parker Bros. board game whose name escapes me at the moment...

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    3. Re:childish? by dthable · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's amazing that the same people crying to give Linux a chance because it's superior to Windows don't want to give other opinions a chance when they go against the group-thought that is rampant on this site. The point is that Slashdot isn't a professional looking site and managers will stay away from the ideas and products pushed, despite how technically superior they operate.

      1980s: No one ever got fired for buying IBM
      1990s and beyond: No one ever got fired for buying Microsoft

    4. Re:childish? by fraudrogic · · Score: 2, Funny

      MONOPOLY??? You've forgot the name of the game MONOPOLY?? hmmm...you're not from 'round here are you?

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
    5. Re:childish? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Businesses don't want anything to do with honesty or consiseness (that isn't a word, is it?).

      Seriously though, it does do those things, but it's also not professional. Like it or not, the professional world doesn't like blunt honesty.

      You may have noticed Slashdot's customary moniker that reads, in part, "News for Nerds." Note that nowhere does it say "News for Business Professionals." It doesn't mention executives, or financiers, nor does it come close to suggesting marketing or PR professionals. Nerds.

      Its been my experience that the really heavy techies in the Industry... the real Nerds and Geeks... tend to handle brutal honesty rather well. Especially when it involves tech subjects they have an opinion about. They may not appreciate the particular opinion. But they'll be glad to voice their own and defend their argument. And if they're successful in their environment - they're very aware to handle the Business Types with considerable more tact.

    6. Re:childish? by KILNA · · Score: 2

      I don't know whether to laugh or cry at that visualization.

      Waaaaahahahah.

      --
      Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  14. How does that saying go? by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First they ignore you...
    Then they laugh at you...
    Then they fight you...
    Then...

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:How does that saying go? by dimator · · Score: 2

      I think the last one is:

      Then this quote gets so played out, its almost disgusting.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:How does that saying go? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      This is still a part of the:
      "Then they fight you"
      line. The winning is still to be proven, but it's becoming a bit more likely.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:How does that saying go? by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      First they ignore you...
      Then they laugh at you...
      Then they fight you...
      Then...
      ...they assimilate you?

      --Dan

    4. Re:How does that saying go? by nathanh · · Score: 2

      Then everybody gets sick of this damn quote being repeated to death. Did you think somebody failed to read it the first million times?

  15. Someone's missing. by watanabe · · Score: 2
    Interesting. I note that Redhat is not listed among the exhibitors. Now that's a funny moment. Microsoft exhibits at Linux convention, while Redhat stays home.

    Hell ... is ... getting ... chilly ...

    (unlike Boston today.)

    1. Re:Someone's missing. by rhadamanthus · · Score: 2
      --
      Slashdot needs to interview Natalie Portman.
    2. Re:Someone's missing. by soloport · · Score: 2

      Tiny booth, for Microsoft. Sun's boot is about 16 times larger.

      Of course, size... doesn't... matter... Right?

    3. Re:Someone's missing. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

      Maybe they bought Red Hat. It makes a profit, innovates and could be a threat to Microsoft. That usually means they buy it, right?

    4. Re:Someone's missing. by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

      Hm, KDE is also missing and I am pretty sure I am flying into San Francisco for LWCE.

      This either implies a very sloppy job by our organiser or that the exhibitor list is simply not complete.

  16. Interesting by rhadamanthus · · Score: 5, Informative
    According to the floor plan Microsoft is placed just across the way from Codeweavers (booth 1289). What an amusing prospect...

    ----rhad

    --
    Slashdot needs to interview Natalie Portman.
    1. Re:Interesting by dattaway · · Score: 2

      That isle will be the most dangerous place to be.

      Watch out for incoming nerf rockets from both sides.

    2. Re:Interesting by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Perhaps it's my memory going again, but isn't that where "Linux One" was supposed to be a couple years back?

      If it was - Ohhhh the sweet sweet irony!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:Interesting by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      hmmm.... no linuxcare? or am I just blind...

      I just went and checked out the linuxcare site - and their management team. havent heard of any of those guys before - anyone know how they are doing?

    4. Re:Interesting by dybdahl · · Score: 2

      An exhibition is not only about showing products - it's often more about making contacts. Being placed in front of codeweavers, they can see all the people visiting codeweavers. I wouldn't be too happy if I were codeweavers.

  17. Is this like.. by MarvinMouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    an alcoholics anonymous booth at a beer convention?

    Or do you think MS is going to actually give in to Linux?

    --
    ~ kjrose
    1. Re:Is this like.. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Is this like an alcoholics anonymous booth at a beer convention?

      More like a Miller Lite booth at an AA convention.

      Or do you think MS is going to actually give in to Linux?

      The first part of the phrase is "embrace", right?

  18. Causing a reaction by zeus_tfc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My first question after reading the headline, and even after reading the article was "Why?" Does Microsoft expect to try and win converts? I seriously doubt it, and I don't think anyone will believe that they have something to contribute. So, why?

    I think they are trying to cause a reaction and get people upset. They can point to this and say, "Look at how uncivil and mean these people are. Do you really want to be associated with them?" This will give them more leverage in the business world, where professionalism means quite a lot. Remember, MS is more about marketing right now than solid products.

    I dunno. Just a thought.

    --
    "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    1. Re:Causing a reaction by 3seas · · Score: 2

      Oh no.....It's really much much simpler and obvious than that.

      They are arrogant! Really ARROGANT! So Arrogant that they
      continue to practice anti-competitive behaviour after being
      found guilty of breaking federal anti-trust law.

      I mean how can MS be doing something wrong now, as they have
      already been busted, they can't do it again... Sort of arrogance.

      You know it's true!

      MS has kept others, competitors, out of shows they controlled in
      the past, but Linux should be better, give them a chance to leave
      on their own.

      Other exhibitors don't want to get caught up in anything questionable
      in regards to MS getting to and setting up and showing and breaking
      down.... Beside alot of fun can be had at MS expense.

      But there is nothing stopping visitors on their way out, to stop by
      and express to MS what they think of all the FUD MS has been spreading.
      Preferable in pointing out, in a very professional manner, how
      un-professional and outright dishonest such FUD MS has been doing
      against the GPL and such, is. While carefully pasting kick me signs
      on the backs MS booth tenders (including any security MS feels they
      need to hire). (But do it in a very professional manner. Embrace and
      Attach.)

      Some might even be so kind to want to bring them some pies.....Now
      what flavor of pie does Bill Like?

      I have no doubt that it would only take a little civil effort to
      convert the MS booth tenders over to GPL. Simply by communicating to
      them in all the harmless humorous creative ways I know the Linux
      crowd can come up with.

      Just don't be Arrogant in doing it.

    2. Re:Causing a reaction by Anarchofascist · · Score: 2

      "I think they are trying to cause a reaction and get people upset. They can point to this and say, Look at how uncivil and mean these people are..."

      I can't make it to the conference myself, but could the local Linux LUG please organise some sort of community bodyguard group to protect the MS booth from the attacks of childish morons? I don't want to see headlines in Slashdot the day after the event "MS booth flour-bombed" or "Stink-bomb ruckus at MS booth".

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    3. Re:Causing a reaction by aralin · · Score: 2
      Why?

      "Developers, developers, developers...."

      Do I need to say more?

      "Developers, developers, developers...."

      Did I make myself clear?

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    4. Re:Causing a reaction by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2

      I think it could also be cluelessness mixed in with a large dosage of arrogance. Until now, the attitude Microsoft keeps on trying to project is: "Yeah, Linux is fun, but when you're ready to do REAL business work, we're right over here!"

      Although I wouldn't put it past MS to put some dupes into their booth to draw fire, they could also be planning on spinning this in a later press release, talking about how many visitors they had (not mentioning that they were almost all hecklers!).

    5. Re:Causing a reaction by Slashamatic · · Score: 2
      I don't know about the US but the LinuxWorld Europe exhibition in Germany is colocated with a major banking technology exhibition. The badge for one gets you into the other.

      I can imagine that MS, oozing professionalism (=lots of money and practice) can put on a somewhat better booth than most Linux exhibitors. If they get a reaction, I hope that it is rectricted to the humourous (Borged Penguins?) and few machined in nearby booths running the BSOD screensaver.

  19. What??!! by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh"

    Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer" and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?

    Microsoft is publicly out to destroy linux and whatever their motives, they have a lot of nerve to show up in the first place.

    Feel free to pelt them with eggs, because that pales in comparison to their attempts to spread FUD and eventually make our OS illegal or impossible to use. Feel free to mod me down, but nothing I said is a lie.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:What??!! by TheLocustNMI · · Score: 2

      Quote:
      "Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer" and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?"

      Have you been reading Slashdot comment? I'm surprised folks won't be throwing their own feces!

    2. Re:What??!! by totro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer"
      >and attacks linux publicly whenever possible by
      >telling outright lies, how can we ever look bad?

      Despite the truth that only the informed few know, the ignorant masses will much sooner believe Microsoft because **money talks** (trough PR).

      Anyone throwing eggs will be branded an anarchist, terrorist, you name it, just like most protesters protesting anything these days. The excellent points about MS trying every dirty trick imaginable to defeat Linux will very likely not make it to mainstream news sources. Throwing eggs will give Slashdotters a chuckle, but will do little to forward the cause of Linux and like-minded projects. It will just give the rest of the world more ammunition to ignore our legitimate concerns.

      A little maturity goes a long way towards credibility, people!

    3. Re: What??!! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > Despite the truth that only the informed few know, the ignorant masses will much sooner believe Microsoft because **money talks** (trough PR).

      "Trough PR" - I like that. (I suppose you meant "through PR", but if so the slip was felicitous.)

      At any rate, with citizens' distrust of big corporations at an all time high, this is probably the best time for anti-MS PR to kick into high gear. Eggs won't help, but let your voices be heard.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:What??!! by BigGar' · · Score: 2, Informative

      Feel free to pelt them with eggs

      Nah, eat a relly bad diet for a few days prior then walk up to the booth, ask them what's going on. Then as you leave, BREAK WIND.

      --


      Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    5. Re:What??!! by sheldon · · Score: 2

      Feel free to pelt them with eggs, because that pales in comparison to their attempts to spread FUD and eventually make our OS illegal or impossible to use.

      The statement "eventually make our OS illegal or impossible to use" would qualify as FUD under most definitions, and I find it curious you decided to employ FUD in a message intended to denounce FUD.

      This is that part about being mature. If you have legitimate complaints, then voice them. When you start shouting the sky is falling and people look around and see no debris, they're going to relegate you to the "oh, that lunatic again" category and stop listening to you.

      I sense a lot of hatred in your message that seems to be distorting your view of reality. Let go of the hatred, for it will only lead you to the dark side of the force.

    6. Re:What??!! by WowTIP · · Score: 2

      Pelt them with eggs???

      Why not set up a Microsoft Certified (monkey boy) Dance outside their booth. If someone questions your behavior you can just tell them you are a fan of Steve Ballmer and paying a tribute.

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    7. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "Considering Microsoft has called the GPL a "Cancer""

      Let's not forget MS execs calling us un-american, communists and terrorist sympatizers too. I for one would like to punch them out just for calling me communist.

      I agree with you hit them with whatever is handy. They deserve much worse then anything you are likely to do to them.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    8. Re:What??!! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      I for one would like to punch them out just for calling me communist.

      Why, exactly? The whole Cold War was fought with pure FUD on both sides; for what reasons, exactly, do you so dislike Communism?

      The GPL does indeed work like a cancer. GPL'd code lives forever, instead of dying after a set time. GPL'd code gets close to other code, invades other code (mostly through developer work), and then it takes over the whole of the non-GPL'd project.

      Even if the above doesn't happen, there's *nothing* in the GPL to prevent it. GNU.org could kill MS's FUD with one simple amendment to the GPL (codify what is and is not derivitive *in the license*, or for pete's sake at least require Clear Identification), but they don't.

    9. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "Why, exactly?"

      Because I am not a communist, anti-american or a terrorist. I am a veteran, I served my country proudly, i vote, I participate. Who the hell is Bill Gates to call me a communist.

      As for the GPL it has nothing to do with me being a communist. If you don't like the GPL stay the fuck away from GPLed code. Write your own code and stop your whining about how you are unable to use other peoples hard work to make money for yourself. That sound more like communism then anything else to me.

      Write your own code, that's the american way. Anybody who is whining about the GPL is too lazy to do the work themselves and want to steal from other people. As a christian you ought to be the first one stand up and sing the virtues of working hard and not leeching off of other peoples labor. The is a cost to using GPLed code and that cost is steep. If you don't want to pay it stay away.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    10. Re:What??!! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      First off, I have nothing but repsect for veterans, Sir. Please don't take my questions as an attack at your honor, but rather as a simple intellectual discussion.

      Write your own code, that's the american way. Anybody who is whining about the GPL is too lazy to do the work themselves and want to steal from other people.

      Actually, I prefer to pay others to write my code, and to utilize the freely given efforts of others whenever possible when construcing something as utilitarian as a software project; were I a coder, I would follow the way of my friends who do code and use the GPL, as being the closest thing there is to a real software "community."

      As a christian you ought to be the first one stand up and sing the virtues of working hard and not leeching off of other peoples labor. The is a cost to using GPLed code and that cost is steep. If you don't want to pay it stay away.

      As I said above, I have no problem at all in paying the cost of using GPL'd code. But this discussion isn't about the GPL--it's about communism.

      As a Christian, I have as much right as anyone else to dislike Communism (The second Fatima prophecy was about the evils of Communism.) But as a Chrisitian, I am compelled to love--and therefore attempt to undersand--the enemy.

      In theory, Communism seems to be an ideal system; everyone works, and everyone benefits. But it is riddled with faults and corruption, from double standards to tyranny to religious oppression. It's also attached to an amazing system of FUD brought about partly by the less-than-perfect capitalists of the 20th century, and mostly by the countries that didn't take kindly to a new government calling for a worldwide revolution.

      I think Bill Gates is a poster child for the USSR's anti-capitalist propaganda when he calls the GPL "Communist"--but I would hope that you sir, as an honored veteran, would know why you hate the defeated enemy, and not simply follow the unquestioned FUD that was necessary to win the Cold War.

    11. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "but I would hope that you sir, as an honored veteran, would know why you hate the defeated enemy, and not simply follow the unquestioned FUD that was necessary to win the Cold War."

      I do not hate the communists or the russians. When I was stationed within 300 miles of vladivostok (the biggest russian military base) we used to joke that if the russians ever came after us we'd offer them vodka and get them drunk because both the US soldiers and the russian ones would have rather drank themselves silly then shoot each other.

      As for communism itself it's main tenents are not that much different then the sermon on the mount. The problem of communism is the problem of people. People are not good, generous or considerate of others needs. Communism does not work because people are not good, capitalism does work because people are selfish and greedy. But that's neither here nor there.

      I don't hate communists or communism. What I hate is Bill gates calling me a comunist or a terrorist when I am clearly not. Especially since he has never volunteered to wear a gas mask for 10 hours and stew inside a chem suit in hundred degree weather. He has no right to call me a communist.

      He is doing that because he knows that most people associate communism with stalin, lenin and other evil people who slaughtered millions of innocents. He wants the average american to think of GPL coders and advocates as murderers and evil. It's a calculated attack on people. He could have said GPL is like socialism (it is), he could have said GPL is like charity (it is), he could have said it's like christianity (it is kind of), instead he chose the word communism. Why? Because Americans react negatively and violently to communists. That's what he wants! He wants Americans to react negatively and violently towards me, you, and anybody else who develops or uses GPLed software.

      For that reason alone MS and it's employees deserve every rotten egg, tomato or a fist thrown in their direction. I don't go around slandering them or their families nor do I go around lobbying politicians to make what they do illegal. Why are they attacking me?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    12. Re:What??!! by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Interesting. Now think for a second, what would Jesus have to say about that remark?

      "Hey, let me do that." Jesus is God, and God can punish people; heck, the whole imperetive to love thy enemy is because they need to be loved, especially once God gets angry at them.

      For the record, I'm an agnostic-atheist pacifist, and I disagree. Morality can come from logic as easily as it can from religious teachings.

      You're either Agnostic (don't know) or atheist (know that there's nothing.) Please pick one.

      And you're right--in theory. Morality can be reasoned out by man. But I don't think God wanted to wait for us to figure out what was good and what wasn't on his own, so he spent several thousand years trying to teach us.

    13. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "ME---
      For that reason alone MS and it's employees deserve every rotten egg, tomato or a fist thrown in their direction.

      YOU---
      Hmm. Interesting. Now think for a second, what would Jesus have to say about that remark? "

      I don't know nor do I care. I don't believe in God. What I do know is this.

      When Bin Laden attacked the US we went after the taliban because they were shielding him. When we went after the taliban we dropped bombs on counless locations in afghanistan. We killed thousands of people who were either foot soldiers of the taliban or lived in taliban controlled areas. What did these people have to do with the attack on world trade center? Well nothing really but they were legitamate targets of military action because however indirect their actions helped al-quada attack WTC. They shoulder some of the blame no matter how small and for that they died.

      The same goes for Microsoft employees. They are responsible for the actions of their company, supervisors, CEOs etc. It is fair and just to retaliate against them for the crimes and evil acts done by their company and it's employees. It is fair to hit, shun, insult, and otherwise take to task any MS employee for what their bosses do. If they don't like it they should quit and stop supporting an evil regime. Simple as that.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    14. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      "I personally find killing those people unacceptable."

      If this is so you are in the 5% minority of people who disagree with the actions taken by the US govt.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    15. Re:What??!! by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      I was using 5% as a figuritive number the actual number may be as high as 10%. Yes I meant US citizens.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  20. Re:New Distro! by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 2
    Why exactly are they attending!? That's like the NSA attending Defcon.

    Exactly.

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. You gotta hand it to them... by Subcarrier · · Score: 5, Funny

    The personnel manning the stand must have balls bigger than their brains. This deep into hostile territory they ought to have air support.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    1. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      The personnel manning the stand must have boobs bigger than their brains. This deep into hostile territory they ought to have air support.

    2. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

      All they need to do is get Steve Ballmer up there.. he must have balls the size of melons (not literally), and would gladly take on any Linux zealot with some pep-talk about how great Microsoft products are :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:You gotta hand it to them... by Locutus · · Score: 2

      It's all a training exercise for the latest Tiger-Team of Linux bashing salesmen. They need to make sure these guys won't cave under pressure so they are sending them off to Linux Expo.

      Or they just want to know exactly how many show up each day and get other stats from the organizers. Maybe the organizers should have a software bug and let Microsoft know that exactly 100 people showed each day of the event. When Microsoft complains, they can say they had a bug and will fix it for the next show. :)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  23. *cough* *sputter* by Gannoc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Isn't that usually you? Seriously, nothing personal, thats what the site is about, but your comments after most story submissions tend to represent the worst elitist, one sided opinions of the community.

    1. Re:*cough* *sputter* by mchappee · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Seriously, nothing personal, thats what the
      > site is about, but your comments after most
      > story submissions tend to represent the worst
      > elitist, one sided opinions of the community

      You've obviously never browsed below score threshold 2. Taco's editorial comments are very sane, grammatically superior, and thoroughly spell-checked compared to the LESS THAN 2 norm. Oh, and Taco has never pointed us at goatse.

      Matthew

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
  24. Rumor: by vegetablespork · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their booth will be right next to the exhibit floor exit, with a big sign that says "WE HAVE THE WAY OUT."

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    1. Re:Rumor: by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Their booth will be right next to the exhibit floor exit, with a big sign that says "WE HAVE THE WAY OUT."

      Y'know, Bill's salesdroids always did remind me of the guy who ran the circus with the nice sign saying "THIS WAY TO THE EGRESS!"

  25. Of course it won't happen but by sulli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ya gotta admit that Office for Linux would be a useful thing to have around.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Of course it won't happen but by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Funny
      ya gotta admit that Office for Linux would be a useful thing to have around

      Yeah, I've been needing something to load test my machine with.

    2. Re:Of course it won't happen but by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      indeed it would, wouldn't it.
      any you'd pay them for it too, wouldn't you?

      now think about that...

  26. Why else would they be there? by jsimon12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does them pushing .NET not make sense? Gnome supports it and De Icaza love it. Hence my guess that Microsoft will be pushing .NET, cause I doubt they really "love" Linux.

    1. Re:Why else would they be there? by DrXym · · Score: 2
      There is a difference between loving the technology (the VM, the C# language, the classes) and loving how Microsoft are applying it.

      There is not a snowballs chance in hell that Microsoft would promote on .NET in any meaningful way on Linux. They might release a basic runtime on Linux so that a Windows machine can see and start/stop a few basic .NET services. They might also allow Linux users to use services running on the .NET. The important thing to note is Linux would be the client of a Windows-centric network. There is absolutely no chance of it happening the other way around. Microsoft would probably charge you a licence fee for the pleasure too.

      Mono on GNOME is unlikely to help either. It will allow you to run .NET apps, but forget about it offering open source versions of various Microsoft .NET services.

  27. Depends... by unformed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who are you?

    Or, more specifically, male or female?

  28. Competion is good by crumbz · · Score: 2

    Not know what Microsoft will exhibit(Office XP for Linux?), I would guess that they view this as an attempt to get a feel for the crowds and a list of the attendees. Co-opting to show? Maybe. Or maybe they view the Linux market as mature enough to support porting their Windows apps.

    1. Re:Competion is good by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      "Not know what Microsoft will exhibit(Office XP for Linux?), I would guess that they view this as an attempt to get a feel for the crowds and a list of the attendees."

      So as to market them heavily, particularly the less clueful (and more easily succeptable to "shiny things" upper managers) in the companies.

      In that sense, it makes some sense...

      Or maybe this is a BSA booth in disguise, they are showing up to take names for audits, "You don't have a license for that copy of Red Hat, HA!"

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  29. A real LEGITIMATE reason for Microsoft to be there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Say what you will about all their software (the Soft in microsoft), but they do make some pretty decent keyboards and mice which Linux users can make use of.

    They'd best emphasize the hardware over the software; a Linux crowed is not the most recentive place for the software anyway.

  30. So? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've been running ads, along with UNISYS, for a while now, about a certain offering. Who doesn't expect this to be the focus of their exhibit?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:So? by prockcore · · Score: 2

      Does that mean that MS's booth is going to BE the emergency exit? Then MS will go and set a fire and then claim "We have the way out! Come to our booth!"

  31. I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by gatekeep · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... to do so would only result in no further invitations to similar conferences, and getting them bad press amongst a market I'm sure they see as potential customers.

    More likely, I expect they'll have information about their Microsoft Windows services for UNIX

    Showing off services for Unix goes much further toward generating revenue for Microsoft than trying to tell people why *nix is bad or somehow inferior. It actually shows that Microsoft cares about interoperability with *nix. True of false, that's probably the message they'll try to convey. I'll withold my opinions on the validity of that message.

    1. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by gatekeep · · Score: 2

      Damn, I found an even better link just after posting. Sorry about that.

    2. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Zordak · · Score: 2

      If you've seen any of their "One Degree of Separation" ads in trade magazines recently, a new one features "One degree of separation between your Windows Server Hardcores and your UNIX Zealots," and is a plug for their UNIX integration services. My guess would be that this is exactly why they're there. They don't always like to admit it or make it too overly public, but MS has roots in Linux, just like almost every other software shop that's still alive.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    3. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      MS has roots in Linux, just like almost every other software shop that's still alive.

      I think you mean Unix, they had their own flavor of Unix once, XENIX. But NT/2000/XP aren't derived from this, they get their Unix like properties via their VMS heritage.

    4. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Zordak · · Score: 2

      You are, of course, right. I meant UNIX. Saying most software has roots in Linux, which is all of 10 years old, is like saying the music industry has deep roots in the music of N'Sync and Brittney Spears :-)

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    5. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by fferreres · · Score: 2

      It actually shows that Microsoft cares about interoperability with *nix.

      Ok, I won't start this message with the usuall "Are you for real" or the likes. It doesn't work. I'll just point out that there's absolutely NO compatibility effort in the Microsoft side.

      All compatibility is provided by the open source community. Say the Samba server, the FAT32, VFAT, NTFS, the Terminal Server clients, and the list is long.

      Let's face it, they don't like it. Some people may try to convince you they are you fellows. They have some reason for behaving like that, and it's not for true friendship or for _mutual_ benefit.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    6. Re:I doubt they'll use this as a stage for FUD.. by Zordak · · Score: 2

      Yes, but you take my analogy too far. Even when I use RedHat with KDE, I have a console window open and do most of my work there. And I'm not even an old timer (maybe 2.5 - 3 years). The true extent of the analogy is simply that Linux has not been around long enough to be a common heritage to computer systems, just as the latest flash-in-the-pan pop star has not been around long enough to be a common heritage to the music industry.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  32. Rember... by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 2, Informative

    that MS does have a unix kernel. They use it in thier migration from Unix to Windows stuff I think. MS does do some *NIX stuff, they just don't like to admit it. It will be interesting to see what they bring to the *NIX table though.

  33. One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Nomad7674 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well, it would not be totally out of the realm of possibility that MS might form a Linux Business Unit in the same way they already have a Macintosh Business Unit. If they did that to churn out MS Office editions for Linux, it might head off the insurgency of OpenOffice and ThinkFreeOffice and maintain their place as the #1 provider of office software.

    Remember, in the end MS is out there to make money. Ruling the world is just a means to that end.

    1. Re:One possibiltiy... Linux Business Unit? by Asprin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe (based on my own highly irrational speculation as well as anecdotes from the MS & IBM OS/2 collaboration - where MS apparently understood OS/2 internals better than IBM's engineers ever did.) that MS probably does have a secret Linux unit operating right now tearing through the source code and gathering 'information' - hell, they probably know more about the Linux kernel than Linus does. I suspect they're also porting unofficial hush-hush Linux version of Office and IE, and probably also a .Net CLI, .Net server and Exchange Server, maybe even their own desktop environment running on top of X. With their R budget, they'd be nuts not to, especially considering that they consider Linux to be a threat.

      Now, for those of you who think I've gone all loopy: NO, I don't expect that we're ever going to see 'MS Office for Linux', 'IE for MS-XWindows' or 'MS Linux.net' or anything similar at Comp-USA. If any of this stuff exists, I am quite certain MS is working on it to make their own platform better, and not to join the Linux universe - look how they strung out the Java platform.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
  34. The top-10 list of reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. That $200000 prize for Linux on X-Box is just too tempting.

    2. Office on Linux.

    3. DirectX compatibility-layer for Linux.

    4. .Net for Linux.

    5. Finally, a unifying desktop environment for Linux: 'LIN32'.

    6. A new kernel, now featuring Palladium (tm).

    7. No product, they just want to say goodbye to all of us before new laws make Linux illegal. Possibly they'll be mooning _us_.

    8. The booth contains a powerful explosive, set to go off as soon as a keep-alive timer from a PC running Windows XP fails. Talk about a 'blue screen of death'...

    9. They are not yet aware that they are invited to a _Linux_ expo. It is all a weird joke by Larry Ellison.

    and finally... (drumroll please!)

    10. They have ported Microsoft Bob to Linux!

  35. Well... by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

    At least there is one addition this year. Last LinuxWorld I was at was terrible. Was half the previous size and the remaining companies were just holding on.

    Pretty soon they'll be holding it at the VFW...

  36. Star Trek VI? by dimator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone else picture RMS and BillG sitting at a dinner, speaking of the Undiscovered Country?

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:Star Trek VI? by FTL · · Score: 2
      > Does anyone else picture RMS and BillG sitting at a dinner, speaking of the Undiscovered Country?

      RMS: We need breathing room!

      BillG: 640K ought to be enough for anyone.

      --
      Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    2. Re:Star Trek VI? by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

      RMS : "I have never trusted Microsoft, and I never will.. I can never forgive them for the death of GNU."

      BillG : "Crrrry havoc, and let slip Windows Longhorn!"

      Pfft :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:Star Trek VI? by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      Did someone invite RMS too?

      What are they planning, a nuclear explosion?

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Re:Your sig by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    If slashdot sucks, why did you dupe their look and color scheme?

    To try to get people to make accounts.

    Secondly, why did you do such a bad job at it?

    Because I suck.

    SlashdotSucks sucks.

    Most definately.

  39. Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX by nutznboltz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are they going to be plugging this creature? They are testing it against RedHate Linux.

    1. Re:Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX by rasjani · · Score: 2
      Interesting on that given site is that they are openly saying: "Interop Systems: GPL Source Code".

      Check out that "Related sites & Resources box".

      --
      yush
  40. My fear by nullard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My fear is that Microsoft writes something like wine and sells it for Linux. They don't need you to buy their OS, they get you to buy their propriety compatibility layer and their software. Just think how many places that use Linux will be willing to pay $50 for the ability to use Windows apps. Microsoft will make money, and increase market penetration w/out giving anything to the community. Getting Linux users to run Microsoft software may be their first step in fighting Linux.

    --


    t'nera semordnilap
    1. Re:My fear by JordoCrouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just think how many places that use Linux will be willing to pay $50 for the ability to use Windows apps. Microsoft will make money, and increase market penetration w/out giving anything to the community.

      Lemme ask you something.. What the hell is wrong with Microsoft, as a commercial corporation, writing an emulator layer for Linux? They're not going to be able to take over the kernel. They're not going to be able to force their opinions or policies on anyone who doesn't use their brand of emulation, and to tell you the truth (no offense to the WINE folks), I'll bet that they will write a pretty damn good emulator. The only thing evil and borgish thing that they might do is to modify their Windows software to only work on *their* emulator. And I bet if they knew how to prevent WINE from running Windows apps, they would probably have already done it.

      There is a huge market for Windows apps, even amongst Linux geeks. It might be a game that only runs on Windows, or it might be an specialized app, or it might be solitare for all I care. The fact of the matter is that there was obviously a need for WINE / WinForLinux / VMWare.

      As for not giving back to the community - well, there is a long list of folks who have taken from the community without giving back. Part of software freedom is the understanding that there will always be people who take and never give.

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    2. Re:My fear by MadAhab · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I agree, up to a point. But an emulator might be an interesting "viral" technique for them. For one thing, it gets onto the desktops where linux might be a threat, like in large installations of workstations for, i dunno, the peruvian govt.

      Once they get into your machine that way, well, there's all kinds of little features, e.g. sound, that might "accidentally" break here and there unless you are using a particular linux distro. With whom they would naturally have a partnering agreement, since somebody's got to do the support for that. What's next? Gee, you need to use this "drm-approved" sound driver if you want our emulator to work. Sorry. Pretty soon they've taken over your allegedly free system in any way they please.

      It doesn't have to work all that well. It shouldn't, in fact. It should work just well enough that it gets adopted, but badly enough to make sure it doesn't outshine their own OS.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    3. Re:My fear by happyclam · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... my fear is that Microsoft writes a Linux emulator for Windows.

      <theory type="conspiracy">
      They will make it available for free to show the world how open they are. They will make it so easy to download and install that every eMachines owner will get it immediately. Hell, they may even include it with their next Windows update.

      It will be SO buggy and error prone that all those Windows users will conclude that they will never switch to Linux.
      </theory>

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    4. Re:My fear by adam613 · · Score: 2

      This is an interesting thought, but it will never work for Microsoft. In my experience, most Linux users are much less tolerant of pieces of software that don't work together than most Windows users are. If I have to use a certain distro for a piece of software, then I won't be using that piece of software (especially since I use LFS). This could change if hordes of people suddenly started using Linux overnight, but that isn't going to happen. People who were already considering switching would start to do so, learn how things work in the world of Linux (where software must cooperate in order to be accepted), and be all ready to train the next set of newbies. If Microsoft understood how to penetrate that kind of market, they would have destroyed Linux already (not to mention Apple).

    5. Re:My fear by sheldon · · Score: 2

      At least you labeled your FUD correctly and honestly. :-)

    6. Re:My fear by JordoCrouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gee, you need to use this "drm-approved" sound driver if you want our emulator to work. Sorry. Pretty soon they've taken over your allegedly free system in any way they please.

      The important thing is that Microsoft would be entering this thing as a player on equal footing with other competitors. In the past, Microsoft has been a competitor, but has also been the ruling body for the competition itself. Products like WordPerfect would come in, and lose because Microsoft could change the underlying operating system to suit their whims.

      Now, I understand that they can still rise to the top of the emulator market, because after all, only they have access to the secret APIs that even the WINE folks can only dream about. And I understand that they will do everything to try to switch the situation over to their favor.

      But two important things still remain - if you choose not to buy into the Microsoft way of life, you can still use Linux, becuase while Microsoft can play games in their little corner of the Linux world, they still can't influence change in the kernel without giving it back to the community.

      There is only one Windows, and it comes from a single point somewhere in Washington. You either use Windows from Microsoft or you don't use it at all. There are multiple Linux distros, so you are not forced to use the Microsoft approved (TM) distro if you don't want to (and I expect that if they play their usual games, then few people will want their distro, even if it means using a less compatible solution).

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    7. Re:My fear by erat · · Score: 2

      Man, I want some of what you're smokin', dude!

      The single biggest hinderance in the adoption of Linux as a viable desktop OS is most likely its inability to run MS applications efficiently. WINE comes close (CodeWeaver's version especially), but it still isn't "there". And don't give me a bunch of hooey about VMWare; that's not emulation, that's actually running Windows. A clean emulation layer that doesn't require hundreds of megs of disk space and costs about $50 would be a friggin' GODSEND for Linux. I hope to hell they actually do that... I'd be one of the first people to buy the damn thing!

    8. Re:My fear by gmack · · Score: 2

      If MS does that we win.. think about it.

      Why don't more people use Linux? no commercial apps.

      Why don't we have commercial apps? Not enough people use Linux.

      It's a circular problem that would be fixed the minute somone has a working emulator.

      Installed base == native apps.

    9. Re:My fear by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2
      The only thing evil and borgish thing that they might do is to modify their Windows software to only work on *their* emulator. And I bet if they knew how to prevent WINE from running Windows apps, they would probably have already done it.
      Actually, I'm somewhat frightened by the fact that Microsoft has not made any attempt at all to either kill the WINE project or prevent their software from running on it. It kind of makes me think that they've got an 'ace' which they're ready to unleash just as soon as WINE finally starts to become usable by non-techies.

      What will it be? Do they have some really great legal maneuver so unstoppable that they're confident enough to rely on it? Or do they plan on making the next version of Office depend on some weird crypto chain that only Genuine Microsoft Windows can authenticate? Even worse, will the next version of Visual Studio generate applications that do this, so even third-party apps stop running on WINE?

      Yeah, I'm paranoid. WINE is finally getting to the point where it's usable; I think it's entirely possible that within the next year it's going to start approaching the level of accuracy OS/2 had in running Windows apps. The fact that Microsoft appears ok with this so far is extremely suspect.
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    10. Re:My fear by MiTEG · · Score: 2
      I didn't say it was bad thing only if Microsoft does it. My point is that it is entirely possible for Microsoft to require some pretty major changes to the kernel for any software they create to work, and there really isn't much we can do to avoid it. The reply was only to point out my disagreement with the statement they're not going to be able to take over the kernel.

      Oh, BTW, who is "you ppl"? I just want to know what group you're trying to classify me under ;).

      --
      The future isn't what it used to be.
    11. Re:My fear by tunah · · Score: 2

      It will be SO buggy and error prone that all those Windows users will conclude that would feel right at home on linux.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    12. Re:My fear by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      Lemme ask you something.. What the hell is wrong with Microsoft, as a commercial corporation, writing an emulator layer for Linux?

      Part of the reason OS/2 died is the fact that since it ran windoze software, developers saw no need to create the superior native apps for it (protected memory, re-usable objects, very good threading, etc). Then when win95 came out, guess what...none of the windoze stuff designed for the 'new and improved' windoze would run on OS/2.

      Microsoft could do exactly the same thing by running stuff on linux, and then changing everything to break it. They basically released windoze 3.11 to break OS/2's 'for windows' version in the early 90's.

      People who care about running windoze on linux, or porting windoze stuff to linux instead of doing it the 'unix way' (small tight apps that excel at a specific task, easily chained together or embedded within one another) really bother me a lot.

      Linux needs quality native stuff. Not windoze stuff running on top of it. Not bloated all-in-one crap.

    13. Re:My fear by marhar · · Score: 2
      It's here

      "With Windows Services for UNIX 3.0, you can optimize existing investments in UNIX infrastructure and applications while capitalizing on Windows innovation."
    14. Re:My fear by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      My fear is that Microsoft writes something like wine and sells it for Linux.

      I don't get why this would be a problem - that's exactly how IBM got Linux running on their mainframes, running Linux within an LPAR. And then the Slashbots are all, like, hooray, IBM supports Linux!

  41. Now would it not be nice by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    if the M$ booth was politely ignored as offtopic :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  42. Bottom 10 Reasons by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    10. Bill's wallet is a little heavy. What better to do than leave a couple of billion at the Sourceforge booth?

    9. Steve Ballmer has a pengiun fetish. It's just not the same since "Bloom County" was cancelled. Time to get another fix.

    8. They think it is a Microsoft expo to which some Linux folks have been invited.

    7. Microsoft loves trekkies. Going to be a lot of them there at any Linux event.

    6. Its like "A Christmas Carol". The Ghosts of OS's Past, Present, and Future have finally convinced Ebenezer Gates of the error of his way.

    5. Due to budget cuts in Redmond, they are really sending the booth crew to collect a load of free pens from the other booths in order to supply the home office.

    2. (don't look for #4 and #3. They were lost due to an XP bluescreen). They are there to market the amazing new LinuXbox.

    1. Yes, certainly. Giving out free copies of those surplus Windows 3.11 5.25" floppies will win over all of those Linux hippies.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  43. Re:Speculation by geeklawyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) get bad PR on F/OS people. Imagine the PR effect of a photo of a 'linux zealot' taking a swing at one of the MS suits.

    2)From the antitrust perspective - showing that they are not 'hostile' to Linux by exhibiting at a linux expo.

    3) genuinely attempting to turn waverers/gullible to the dark side.

    4) Intercepting any curious neutrals and diverting them from the competition - e.g. educational bodies, corporates, people interested in OpenOffice etc..

    5) sheer fucking chutzpah...

    --
    -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
    journal
  44. Prime booth location, too! by dstone · · Score: 2

    Microsoft's Booth is right between "Cybozu Corporation" and "LTrix Engineering". Oooo. Prestigious location.

  45. Re:Please by dimator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would that make ANY sense at all to do? Set up a booth that does nothing but discredit every booth around it? Wouldn't that give them a black eye more than it would do anything else? Wouldn't every tech magazine bash them for doing that?

    Don't you think instead they'll be pushing .NET?

    Think before you post.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  46. The call to booth sales by mckwant · · Score: 2

    Microsoft Mktng Geek: "Hi, this is Microsoft. We'd like to buy a booth at LinuxWorld."

    LinuxWorld Sales Geek: "Damn kids, quit calling here. I don't know who the hell you're trying to amuse. It's not funny, and you're wasting my time."

    You KNOW this happened.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  47. here is by waspleg · · Score: 4, Funny

    a map of their exhibit from linuxtoday.com linking to linuxworldexpo

    http://www.linuxworldexpo.com/linuxworldexpo/v31 /f loorplan/floorplan.cvn?b=224&amp;exbID=118

    might be helpful so you know where *NOT* to be standing when the ticking mechnical suicide penguin bombs come waddling in

  48. I disagree? by drew_kime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember, in the end MS is out there to make money. Ruling the world is just a means to that end.

    Then why is Bill giving away so much to charities? Just for PR? Maybe.

    I think it's more likely that the Microsoft coporate personality is more like a control freak than just greedy. Money is the way they maintain control, not the other way around. Remember, money is power.

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:I disagree? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Bill Gates is NOT Microsoft. What he does with his own (pracitcally unlimited) money is one thing; he can use $100 bills as toilet tissue for all I care (although I admit that I'm glad he's spending some of his billions on charity).

      What Microsoft does with its money is quite another thing, and is subject to intense scrutiny from investors, analysts, and federal investigators. Investors and analysts want an aggressive, cutthroat control freak, and that's what they're going to get, too.

    2. Re:I disagree? by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 2

      Investors and analysts want an aggressive, cutthroat control freak, and that's what they're going to get, too.

      What they don't want is a company engaged in ILLEGAL business practices -- which is what Microsoft has been convicted of. This is FOOLISH behavior on the part of MS.

      Unless you meant cuthroat as in "cutting ones own throat..."

    3. Re:I disagree? by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2


      "Investors and analysts want an aggressive, cutthroat control freak, and that's what they're going to get, too."

      What do you bet that a majority of Microsoft investors do not want an immature asshole like Gates running the company? If they knew the true Gates and the true harm, injury and cost of acquiring a meaningless 90% browser market share.

      Perhaps the investors didn't want hundreds of millions wasted on attorneys?

      Perhaps investors didn't want the ego-manical Gates to ruin the reputation of the company as a trust worth business partner?

      And now that the Microsoft stock bubble has begun to bust, the investors will begin to wonder why Microsoft has NEVER paid a divendend when they are sitting on billions in cash reserves?

    4. Re:I disagree? by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Isn't he himself the biggest single shareholder of the company? In that sense, it's his company. I couldn't care less if they donate or if he donates. That money comes from the goverment, you employer, you and your mama.

      Now, I'd be nice to notice that it's really your money beign donated and your name is beign replaced with a "Microsoft Good" signature. And not only it really is your money, but it was taken from you by unfair practices (monopoly abuse).

      So please cut the crap with this Micrsoft filantropy which IS NOT.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    5. Re:I disagree? by fferreres · · Score: 2

      he can use $100 bills as toilet tissue for all I care

      Interesting. On the other side, I'd prefer he'd use it to actually pay for developing what they sell, harden security, hurry patches dispatchs, suing their legal deparment to secure our rights to free speech.

      But i guess they figured out that if they have all this market share with the actual product as is, then there's no point in making them better. People will just buy at whatever price they ask.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  49. Wouldn't it be nice... by oldstrat · · Score: 2

    Microsoft actually exhibits at the booth,
    and everyone keeps 10ft away from it and refuses to acknowledge it's existance,
    or the existance of M$'s droids when they wander the floor trying to drum up interest.
    The folks with booths near M$ should request to be moved.

  50. Reasons? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Linux® to be unveiled.

    Actually a ploy, they'll show up with buckets of money and try to buy loyalty

    Show all the technology they own and you can't see the source code to - Nyah!!

    We Have The Way Out and we'll show you as soon as we can get the Powerpoint presentation to work

    Rollout, denied-until-two-months-ago-existence, of Modular Windows

    A test to see how low the temperature in Hell can actually go, below freezing

    Demonstration of how Linux servers and Windows workstations can live in peace as soon as their engineers stop changing the specifications every five minutes.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  51. Linux Business Unit by truthsearch · · Score: 2

    Very insightful. I just want to add the fact that MS Office makes up about 60% of MS revenue. It's their most profitable product, by far.

    1. Re:Linux Business Unit by jafac · · Score: 2

      hm, and all this time, I thought their most profitable product was MSDN subscriptions.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  52. Just what microsoft wants by cybercuzco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hear alot of people saying something to the effect of "I hope that the MS booth gets trashed because MS Sucks" This is probably EXACTLY what microsoft wants. Think about it, MS has done all it can to portray Linux as a system designed by crackers and script kiddies, one stop short of terrorists. How do you think the government will react if MS get physically attacked at a trade show? MS Will say: "See, we told you that those Linux geeks are all hackers, you cant trust them to make secure systems, but you can trust us, were the victim here." Which is what will happen im sure.

    --

    1. Re:Just what microsoft wants by Saib0t · · Score: 2
      how do you think the government will react if MS get physically attacked at a trade show? MS Will say: "See, we told you that those Linux geeks are all hackers, you cant trust them to make secure systems, but you can trust us, were the victim here."

      Exactly the same way as they would react if a group of isreali showed up at a "we love palestine" show. They'll laugh at them for being fool enough to show up at a meeting of people they know hate them (for the most part), it's their presence that provoked the others.

      I doubt such a thing will happen though. People will go there, they'll ask why they're there and if they have an interesting product for linux (and get scorned at if they don't), maybe listen to them.
      I'm feeling bad for the PR and techies that will have to be maning the booth though. They'll most certainly get lots of bad comments and/or insults. I don't like Microsoft the corporation, but I have nothing against the people working there (except maybe for the marketroïds and the upper management).

      --

      One shall speak only if what one has to say is more beautiful than silence
  53. Fools! by back@slash · · Score: 3, Funny

    The real reason is so that linux geeks everywhere will lose hours of productive time wondering why MS would have a booth at LinuxWorld.

    --
    This comment was generated by a Squadron of Ultra Ninjas
  54. Why is Microsoft there? My guess. by wazzzup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess if I were Microsoft I would want to be there to "gently reeducate" those IT guys that run MS shops but are considering Linux.

    If I were an IT guy going to the show as a seeker of answers, I would see what Linux has to offer and ask people why I should switch my servers over - get their real life experiences from those that made the switch. If I were an MCSE, possibly investigate how much I'll have to learn to make the switch.

    If I saw the Microsoft booth, I'd then want to ask MS why I shouldn't switch my servers over to Linux and then weigh the pros and cons in the days/weeks/months after the show, probably do a little more investigation. If the booth isn't there, I might not ever ask MS what the cons would be to making the switch.

    The booth might be there to spread FUD/pro-MS information to those on the fence about considering Linux for their servers or recommending Linux to their bosses.

    Plus it doesn't hurt when some kid is mooning your booth while you're talking to one of these on-the-fence guys so you can say "You're gonna trust your company's servers to these kids?"

  55. Some Poor SOB by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    at Microsoft must have lost an office contest or pool -- and his "reward" is to man this booth.

    Who said they never had a sense of humor? Kind of like the principal that says: "If you sale 10,000 candy bars for the school fund raiser -- I will shave my head, and move my office to the top roof for a day...."

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  56. Re:What does that mean? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    Wow. That's probably the most reasonable statement I've ever read from Taco. Maybe I have him pegged wrong after all.

  57. Beware Geeks bearing gifts! by decipher_saint · · Score: 2

    Watch out for free stuff that makes a ticking sound from the MS booth...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  58. Re:Please by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    actually if they are contributing *anything* at the conference make sure you get one... heck make sure you get three or five - or as many as you possibly can...

    trade show gimicky stuff isnt cheap. so get lots of it.... then throw it in the trash as you leave the conference. just make sure you say please - and thank you.

  59. Good point on their hardware. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices. This is the ONLY area where I've seen them actually innovate. (Mouse wheel, first company with an all-surface optical - The grid-pad opts from Sun don't count).

    As long as they stay far away from software, they're golden.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Good point on their hardware. by happyclam · · Score: 2
      There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices.

      Actually, there's another product they do well: trade show booths.

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    2. Re:Good point on their hardware. by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices. This is the ONLY area where I've seen them actually innovate. (Mouse wheel, first company with an all-surface optical - The grid-pad opts from Sun don't count). As long as they stay far away from software, they're golden.

      Perhaps you've never heard of the monstrosity called the xbox?

      --

      AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    3. Re:Good point on their hardware. by John+Fulmer · · Score: 2

      The 'scroll mouse' was first marketed by Mouse Systems, although MS's mouse was the first financially sucessful wheel mouse.

      The optical mouse was also Mouse Systems (with the grid-pad), and MS and Logitech both developed plain surface optical at the same time ~1999. MS was first to market, however.

      http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CuttingEdge/ op ticalmouse990526.html

    4. Re:Good point on their hardware. by MaxVlast · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've heard MS described as a killer mouse company with a software division.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    5. Re:Good point on their hardware. by Ogerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is ONE type of product that M$ does well, and makes an honest living with - Input devices.
      You've apparently never taken one of "their" input devices apart. Do so and learn. Last I checked, they're all made by Mitsumi. Who the heck knows how or by whom they were designed. They're just branded OEM products. I like the keyboard design reasonably well, but Logitech makes much more ergonomic mice IHMO.

  60. Distraction by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    They say that MS always has the prettiest booth babes - and probably the largest stand to put them on. So they just aim to sabotage the show by distracting everybody.

    The only possible response is to dress up in penguin suits and form a 'ring of herring' around the Microsoft booth.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  61. They advertise in Linux mags... by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

    I've seen MS ads in most Linux magazines I've bought. Mostly touting their "enterprise" products, and even offering to GIVE away a copy. Remember, the first dose of herin is often free ;)

    They are there for intimidation purposes, pure and simple, the same reason why they advertise in the mags. "We are Microsoft, we are everywhere, you are not to HAVE your own space without us" is the attitude.

    The best thing to do would be for people there to ignore them and move on, just as I do when I encounter one of their ads in a Linux mag. I don't blame the magazine for taking their money.

    My bet would be they will be touting .NET and maybe their "We have the way out" foolishness is what they will be doing on the surface. But the real purpose is intimidation.

    --
    === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
  62. "No doubt this means that the more childish..." by flacco · · Score: 2
    Yes, remember kids - always treat the megalo-corp that strives to destroy, continually insults, and generally shits all over your favorite operating system with the utmost deference and respect.

    I would laugh until I passed out if a few of the more "childish" among us beat the living hell out of the MS reps, and then chased their tripping, crying, shirtless nose-bleeding-all-over-themselves asses into the streets.

    Just like happened to me and my friend in that puerto rican bar that one time.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  63. two words by TheTomcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    No doubt this means that the more childish among us will make us all look bad. Sigh.

    Tesla Coil.

    S

  64. Protesters dressed as Borg? by emil · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is probably best that we get this all talked out now, and treat them as fairly as possible. However:

    • Have a whole bunch of guys show up with arms in plaster casts and signs on their necks with "Compaq," "Gateway," "Dell," "HP," "IBM," etc. Just mill around their booth.
    • How about a coffin with "Digital UNIX on Alpha - Rest In Peace - BRING THE MICROSOFT MURDERERS TO JUSTICE!"
    • I love Slashdot's "Bill the Borg" logo. How about a T-Shirt? Sold from a booth right next to them? Who has the booths right next to them? Will they play along?
    • How about a T-Shirt like this:
      Windows NT Server $1,000 = Linux Free
      Microsoft Office $300 = Openoffice Free
      MS SQL Server $5000 = Sybase Free
      WHAT ARE YOU PEOPLE THINKING?!?!?!
    • Another T-Shirt: Microsoft DRM - We've got all your money, now we want your civil rights.
    • How about Thomas Pensfield Jackson as a keynote speaker?

      There are lots of things that could be done to convince Microsoft that this is a really bad idea.

    1. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by Soko · · Score: 2

      There are lots of things that could be done to convince Microsoft that this is a really bad idea.

      Why? Why is it a bad idea for them to see the OSS community working? What would be bad about showing Microsoft that they can play fair and win?

      Nevermind who they are and what they do, just trundle along merrily on your OSS way. Doing that instead of picking a fight, or better still actually welcoming them, will show them how to behave in a community. OK, they've been bad boys and have caused a lot of strife, but I believe in reform more that capital punishment.

      "Proprietary software? No thanks. Heyyyy, like the .Net code snippet there, bud. Interested in sharing? I've got some bitchin' PERL scripts here..."

      Don't forget that Microsoft employs geeks too. If we're nice to them (and just burn their Marketing Dept at the stake instead), maybe then they'll open up the locked and bolted doors of the Cathedral once in a while and let the Bazaar in for a look. Kinda like a garage sale. ;-)

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by Kefaa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are lots of things that could be done to convince Microsoft that this is a really bad idea.

      Yes there are, and this would be the ideal time for them to happen. Then the PR machine would roll...
      "Would you trust your business to..."
      "Do you want your government run by..."
      "This is what you can look forward to as a Window's user when you work with Linux..."

      They have millions to spend on spin and are waiting for their "Rodney King" moment.

      We have to be at our absolute best. Showing the business world that we can them in any mixture of Linux/Windows/MAC/UNIX/MVS, that meets their business needs. That the Linux community are the technologists who can improve the business model while reducing costs.

    3. Re:Protesters dressed as Borg? by SN74S181 · · Score: 2

      Just in case you've never read the history of Raymaond's CATB essay, it was written originally as a polemic directed toward the fairly closed 'Cathederal' way certain applications like GNU Emacs were written. Similar to the tight teams that code NetBSD and FreeBSD.

      To quote from Raymond himself: "I discuss these theories in terms of two fundamentally different development styles, the 'cathedral' model of FSF (Editors note: I assume FSF stands for the 'Free Software Foundation') and its imitators versus the 'bazaar' model of the Linux world. "

      The number of people who now seem to have forgotten the CATB essay was written to address issues within the Free Software Community and not as an attack on Commercial software is staggering. It's almost like Raymond himself wants the original context of the essay to fade away.

  65. Microsoft's motives... by surfcow · · Score: 2

    "One can only guess at what Microsoft's motives might be."

    Perhaps that want to make a nice salad? They will certainly be inundated with fresh produce.

    =brian

  66. This is just an invitation for mayhem by JonathanF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft exhibiting at a Linux expo just begs for someone to pull a prank with their booth. Nothing illegal, but something that could really cause a headache.

    I wonder if someone will pull a "Zaltair." :) That was the name of the non-existent computer that Steve Jobs (believe it or not, I don't think it was actually Woz who did this) made a fake brochure for and planted at the MITS booth, MITS being the makers of the real Altair.

    From what I've read, it was hilarious - the poor MITS people were inundated with questions about a product they didn't even know existed (which wasn't their fault, since it didn't)! The real kicker is that Jobs even managed to arrange the brochure so that the hidden "clue" pointed to a different company, Processor Technologies. The only reason we even know this is because of the confession a few years later.

    I can just imagine it now - someone will plant a professionally-made brochure for "Microsoft Linux" or a proprietary Windows emulator for Linux, and the Microsoft reps will be bombarded... or at least, teased mercilessly.

  67. huh? by kennedy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how is this new?

    i've been going to linuxworld for a few years now.. and well.. m$ has been there EVERY year.

  68. Must-attend conference! by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Is the signup page for linuxworld Slashdotted yet?

  69. Re:Why are they even allowed to have an exhibit? by Junta · · Score: 2

    I think it is more that the organizers are more interested in what the companies are paying to be there rather than furthering the cause of linux....

    For example AMD will be there. I doubt they have linux software for sale, but there to say how well Linux runs on AMD. Nothing that furthers the linux 'cause' just a company making money.

    But what if I am wrong and a requirement of the expo is for a company to demonstrate products relevant to linux in order to be admitted (in the interest of keeping the expo from losing focus). Would that mean that microsoft has demonstrated something that runs on linux to push? Or as others have pointed out it might be to push .NET and mention the potential role of Linux in the vision? There is one single application I know MS has written for linux, they had written long long ago a netshow viewer for linux. It was binary only and didn't play much content, but it was meant to show they could be as cross platform as real, the then dominant player in the field. I don't think they would object to porting office to Linux if they thought enough linux users were there to make it worthwhile, I mean, they do it for Mac, and I would bet linux usage has probably at least caught up to mac in the professional workplace, MS most profitable target market.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  70. Obvious by quigonn · · Score: 2

    Obviously Microsoft will do or related something related to BSD. Microsoft likes BSD, since they can rip off all the code (run the 'strings' utility against MS' ftp.exe :-)). At least they gave something "in exchange" to the community, namely a .NET implementation for FreeBSD.

    --
    A monkey is doing the real work for me.
  71. Caldera field day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > (God forbid the day of a "Microsoft Linux").

    When MS sold its Xenix to SCO (yes it really was Microsoft Xenix before it was SCO Xenix) it signed an agreement that MS would never issue another Unix operating system. This was to ally fears in SCO that MS wanted to dump Xenix (an edition 7 Unix) to bring out a System III based Unix.

    Now Caldera owns SCO, and thus this piece of paper. Ray Noorda has sucessfully sued MS by buying DR-DOS from Novell and using that as a means of suing. Perhaps the real reason that he bought SCO was this piece of paper so that he can sue MS if they ever brought out a Linux or BSD based OS.

    1. Re:Caldera field day by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 2

      'fraid not.
      Since they would be using according to RMS, GNU/Linux, and clearly, Gnu's Not Unix. They would be fully in the right.
      If you could moderate reality, RMS would get a -1 Life's a Bitch.

  72. Mabey they want us to ack like a child. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of the big Open Source Developers are almost violently opposed to Microsoft. And if MS in on the turf and they do ack like children then the Buisness people who are there to determin if Linux suits there needs sees this behavior they may just leave with the opinion that Linux hasent matured enough for the buisness class. Or better yet for MS a crazy Open Source Developer attacts a MS representivie, then that is one more OS(Open Source) developer put into jail and one less OS programming. So if we act like a kids that are acting like the level of my writting (probably 2nt grade). Then MS looks good.

    And if we are all professional which I think may be closer to the truth then MS will have the opertunity to give their side of the story. Eather way it is win win solution for MS.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  73. ADDITIONAL reasons... by happyclam · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. They really want that Peruvian government contract.
    2. They felt that Linux users around the world were deprived the added vacation time enjoyed by Windows users, so they are appearing to show off their three new Linux-based viruses.
    3. It was part of the "community service" they have to perform as part of their antitrust settlement
    4. They will be collecting names of attendees... their software license audit list is getting short and they need to keep the pipeline full
    5. Their marketing department has automatically signed them up for every "expo" in the country because it has the letters "xp" in it.
    6. Their booth will actually be empty. They just wanted to thumb their collective nose at the Linux community with their $44 billion in cash reserves.
    7. They've ported Clippy to Linux.
    8. It's a new form of hazing for all the fresh-out-of-college marketing employees.
    9. The network on the show floor has always been impervious to viruses; putting a whole bunch of Microsoft Outlook boxes on the network will solve that problem.
    10. It is classic cold war, arms-race tactics. By showing up with the biggest booth and the biggest budget, soon they will dominate and co-opt the entire show, and the little fish won't be able to show up any more. In five years, LinuxWorld Expo will be dead, or at least turned into a sidelight for another Microsoft lovefest. I wish it weren't so.
    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  74. Re:So what? We let the BSD guys in? by ellem · · Score: 2

    Yeah but come'on....
    Those HOT FreeBSD Grrls
    In their skin tight Red LaTex cat suits....
    soooo sweaty underneath....
    mmm unbathed demoness....
    so hot.... so very hot....

    (crap I need a moist towlette over here!)

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  75. Re:Resist the Urge! - MS is a marketing company.. by Locutus · · Score: 2

    My feeling is that they probably get some kind of information about how many people showed and other statistically useful information. Just like they insisted on pulling $1 from each copy of SCO UNIX and kept close tabs on how many copies of OS/2 sold.

    The use this information to determine how much of their $40+ billion they need to spend on FUD and if more goes to "F", "U", or "D".

    They don't belong at Linux Expo but they are a marketing company after all.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  76. Microsoft is the Borg; court said so - Monopolists by ClarkEvans · · Score: 2

    Well, Taco you can start making slashdot look less childish by using a decent Microsoft icon, instead of the Bill Gates borg.

    Hunh? No. It's perfect. This is exactly what Microsoft is. They've taken advantage of a very imballenced copyright law to dominate thousands of smaller (and even larger) businesses. The fact that Billy's net worth is greater than 40-45% of the U.S. Population combined is just stunning, no other word for it -- something is horribly, horribly wrong here. Calling a spade a spade is exactly what is needed. Microsoft *is* the Borg if anything could be the borg.

  77. freezing hell by stew77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, you guys can be joking around up there. Be glad you're not down here, Satan's bitching all day now about that freezing cold we have now. You know, hell used to be a lovely hot place, but now it's just friggin' cold down here and Satan is swearing all the time. No fun.

  78. Exhibiting their technology by Lonath · · Score: 2

    Well, not specifically that. But, my guess is that they'll have a booth with descriptions of all 538 Microsoft pure thought patents that linux users violate every time they turn on their computers.

    They'll have cameras and facial recognition software to use to find out who's at the expo since they can assume that everyone there not working for Microsoft must be using Linux or wants to use Linux.

    That way, they can go after current hardcore users of Linux for infringement of Microsoft's pure thought patents, and make it clear that anyone who even attempts to use Linux will put themselves at grave risk for future lawsuits!!!

    Or, they'll exhibit Palladium.

    But I repeat myself.

  79. Probably an Acquisition by happyclam · · Score: 2

    Doesn't anyone else think it odd that a company with $40 billion in cash would get a 10'x10' booth in the "startups" section at the Linux show?

    Perhaps the single most plausible explanation for this is that Microsoft recently acquired a company that had already paid for their booth. There are several companies listed on the rookery page of the conference web site that do not appear on the show floor map. These include Globetrotter, Shaolin Microsystems, APPX Software, and Cylant. None of them appears to have anything on their web sites about being acquired, however.

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  80. Re:Causing a reaction - in the name of SECURITY by Locutus · · Score: 2

    Maybe 40 people dressed in Tux outfits should circle their booth and stay there for the duration of the Expo. And say it is for security reasons. :)

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  81. A better choice: by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Post a simulation of a MS EULA with a question:
    Is this a cancer?

    It probably would need to be a simulation, as I believe that the terms of the EULA prohibit you from disclosing it to anyone else. And copyright law would certainly prohibit you from distributing it. But it should be easy enough to make something that looks convincing at the start and end.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  82. Microsoft Question by Zancarius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean they will be showcasing their FreeBSD mail servers that have served them so well with hotmail?

    --
    He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
  83. OK, but then what? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    I can accept that throwing eggs isn't a good idea. This doesn't tell me what is a good idea. Maturity may be great, but it doesn't in itself suggest a path forwards.

    How can this be used to the advantage of the community?
    How can this be used to the detriment of MS?

    These are reasonable questions. I don't have a reasonable answer to either of them. (Outside of the trivially obvious.)

    I suspect that if MS saw any possibility of a large downside that they wouldn't show up.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    1. Re:OK, but then what? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Good suggestions. But they don't depend in any way on MS having/not having a booth at LinuxWorld. That was where I was trying to find some appropriate way to advantage the community.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  84. Re:Thinkfree is misleading marketing by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Buried? It was on the page linked to! $49.something. They didn't mention the cost for shipping, handling, tax, etc., but that's usual. I didn't go any deeper, as I no longer have a Mac, but the price was right up front.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  85. Look who they are almost directly across from... by twoslice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Codeweavers (Booth 1289)
    Does Microsoft feel that they are their greatest threat or is this just a conspiracy theory???

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  86. Microsoft Has Repsonded by LinuxScribe · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just wanted to inform everyone that I was finally able to get a hold of someone from Microsoft who answered the question of why they were planning to attend.

    The story has been updated with the Microsoft replies as of 2103 UTC.

    Peace,
    LinuxScribe
    a/k/a Brian Proffitt
    Linux Today

  87. Why shouldn't they be welcome? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Because of their licenses.

    I could go into a lot of details, but that's the core. They treat their customers no better than they treat their business associates. And they treat their business associates no better than they treat their competitors. And they try to kill off the competition.

    Work out the logic, and you will see why no civilized community should consider them for membership.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  88. Re:s/:Linux is dying/ MS-BSD/g by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

    About the Xbox.. Microsoft *claim* it is a very very stripped down version of the Windows 2000 kernel - stripped down from somthing like 17MB to 20K - which I find a little unlikely :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  89. The Ace - perhaps? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    The ace is called WinXP. Possibly Win2000 also, I'm not sure. I believe that things are such that it is illegal for Wine to successfully emulate the WinXP standards. If they want to emulate Win95, Win98, or WinNT I think that they can try, but I believe that MS has a legal hold over WinXP. I probably believe this because of the recent articles I've come across about the now current MS sdks requireing that the software not be used in conjunction with any GPL software. And because of XP software wanting to register itself much more verbosely than it once did. And because of an EULA that gave MS the right to add, copy, remove, or change any information on you hard disk. But this is clearly not sufficient to justify the belief, so there's probably some other source that I can't call to mind.

    If this is correct, then all that Wine can do is collect the folk who weren't upgrading their MS software anyway, and this probably wouldn't bother MS all that much. It doesn't cost them anything, it keeps their best software in front of people, and it continues to give people an incentive to "upgrade" to the most recent MS software. Which, of course, would need to be on a windows machine.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  90. Unfortunately MS has some unix connect. software by TeddyR · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Unfortiunately, they may actually have a reason for being there to show interoperability.

    MS does have a product that they call "Unix Services for NT" and "Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX (SFU)"

    http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/productinfo /d efault.asp

    Then there is the FUD from
    http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/migrate /unix/

    --

    --
    Time is on my side
  91. Quick!! by BurritoWarrior · · Score: 2

    Someone send Satan a parka before he gets sick!

  92. Bizarre by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    If you run a trade show, do you have to allow criminals to get booths if they want them?

    It's like some kind of twisted variation on the antitrust trial. "But of course we have to let them in, and give them space if they pay for it. How else do you expect them to threaten our customers?"

    I'm pretty disappointed that this was allowed. Can we have a bit of perspective here? Is this show not private property?

  93. Re:BSD is not dead by GutBomb · · Score: 2

    but MS did not port office over to the bsd layer. apple has thier own api's and toolkits that run on top of the BSD layer. you should know this, it's basic knowledge. you can't simply take something written specifically for OSX and compile it on freebsd. you must also port those toolkits, api's etc...

  94. They're going to be evangelizing Palladium by surfimp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's something from an article titled "Microsoft Seeks Industry-Wide Collaboration for "Palladium" Initiative" I found on Microsoft's website:

    PressPass spoke to John Manferdelli, general manager of the Windows business unit that is building Palladium. He says that while Microsoft's global outreach to the rest of the computer industry has only just begun, the response so far has been very positive. "The development of Palladium is still in its infancy," he says. "While we realize there are many more constituencies that need to be brought into the process, we have every reason to believe this is a technological breakthrough that the industry can really get behind."

    I think they're coming to LinuxWorld in an attempt to get Linux/OSS developers on-board with Palladium. That's the big story, of which .NET is only a part.

  95. Re:Please by dh003i · · Score: 2



    Well, gee, talk about FLAMEBAIT and OFF TOPIC at a LinuxWorld Expo. Using it to further their own interests, despite the fact it has no place at all.

    Try to think about what people are saying before your criticize. The point was M$ wouldn't be showing anything beneficial to Linux; they're only there to serve their own interests, and its completely inappropriate of them to be there.

  96. Jeez...I Think I'll Wait in the Car by reallocate · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Most of these posts are rubbish. Judging by them, Linux is supported by puerile adolescents who believe that making money is evil. Repeat after me: It is only software. It is not religion.

    Microsoft has every right to exhibit at that expo. As to what they'll do there, they'll obviously try to convince some of the attendees that they have useful products and services for sale. Since Linux seems more a threat to proprietary Unix vendors than to Microsoft, I'd guess they'll hype Unix-Windows interoperability gizmos.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  97. Maybe... just maybe... by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Funny
    their heart is actually in the right place for a change and they plan on giving out free CD's with WINDOWS source code on it.

  98. More info by awptic · · Score: 2

    Microsoft's presence at the linuxworld show will be about their offerings for embedded devices, and how they compare to Linux; a statement made my a Microsoft rep. can be found at linuxdevices.com.

  99. Geeks should not speak about business by hayden · · Score: 2

    Microsoft would be absolutely crazy to do an Office port to linux. MS Office is the only app that is keeping the vast majority of desktop computers running Windows (MCSE are tools, not apps). Once linux has it there really isn't that much reason to run windows on the desktop anymore. Linux is much easier to administer and lock down. With Office on linux, it seriously reduces the retraining costs and at the same time seriously reduces the OS purchasing costs. Without Windows on the desktop, Windows in the back room also falls apart (I could frig with Windows networking for a couple of days or I could use NIS and NFS).

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  100. Denial of "Service" by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    Here's how people need to respond to this:
    1.) Entirely ignore any presentations they put on. Standing around watching just wastes your time and gives them apparent credence, especially with the press.
    2.) Wear subtle anti-MS themed clothing to the Expo. Simple, witty statements that get the truth across.
    3.) Overwelm their representatives with fake interest--in other words quietly D.O.S. their trained FUD-spewing drones--but don't give them any feedback as to how to attack next. Play dumb while gaining recon on their latest propaganda tactics.
    In other words quiet, peaceful subversion. It's self defense people. They're looking to stir up a fuss and gain some ground somewhere.

  101. Can you top that? by jsse · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure if it's off-topic, but I've a gut feeling that Microsoft comes to show you little kids how a big guy plays the game.

    We've an exhibition in Hong Kong with Microsoft's booth surrounded by their rival companies.

    Microsoft didn't bring any technical man, not much sales or marketing guys, no free gifts. However, we all lost the publicity - see it yourself why

    Can you top that?

  102. GOD DAMMIT! by small_dick · · Score: 2

    I already paid for two people and IDG has a "no cancellation" policy. This sucks.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
  103. late response... by erroneus · · Score: 2

    ...I know this is a late response and will not likely get much readership but I'll toss my comment in here anyway.

    When I think of Microsoft at a Linux show, I think of Hare Krishnas at the airport. No one wants to see them there and they know it, but they come anyway. They just can't "not" come.

    But you know? In some respects, I'd like to see them there just to see what happens!!

    First and foremost, I like MSIE as a browser. I'm not yet satisfied with Mozilla on my Redhat box... (I'm also getting disillusioned with Redhat since Gnome 2.0 RPMs aren't quite keeping up and Mozilla 1.1a RPMs aren't to be found yet... go ahead, call me a moron... I can take it.) I also like MS Office although admittedly, I haven't explored Open Office much deeper than a surface glance. And the #1 reason I still use a MS operating system is it's Japanese language support and handling. When I can acquire the convenience and compatibility with apps that Windows gets for Japanese language I/O under Linux, I'll finally dump MS altogether.

    (Perhaps it's just me... there is something about Japanese support under Linux I don't yet understand...)

  104. Honestly by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    I'd rather see their booth have no attendees. I imagine the view from above would be this small area around their booth completly barron of attendees. That's what I invision.

  105. Re:Bill Gates talaxian instead? by mpe · · Score: 2

    Actually a Ferengi would a better match. Talaxians just look stupid. Ferengi put the almighty dollar (okay, gold-spanked latinum or whatever it is) above all else, like Bill.

    Maybe slashdot could use a regular Ferengi for Enron, Wordlcom, Xerox, (whatever the next one will be). With a Borgified Ferengi for Microsoft :)

  106. Actually Rotor runs on linux by Otis_INF · · Score: 2


    4. .Net for Linux.

    This is not an imaginary thing: Rotor, the shared source .NET implementation released by MS and Corel to run on Windows and FreeBSD is ported to Linux not long ago. But I doubt they will show that off on their booth :)

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  107. Reasons For Showing Up by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

    It seems that they will be attempting to show off products with embedded XP technology, and various server products.

  108. Next to? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2

    Nope, in front of.

    And the sign will have the subtitle "And for a low, low fee, you can use it."

  109. Boston Tea party - yeah this is late posting. by 3seas · · Score: 2

    Remember the Boston Tea party?

    Perhaps this Show where MS is going to show up...

    Take all the MS stuff you have and make it unsuable.
    Then dump it in the MS booth with a reference to the Boston Tea party.

  110. Cretins by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Reading some of the responses to this item, just makes me feel that Linux is doomed to a geeky ghetto of its own making. With friends like some of the people posting here cackling with glee at nasty tricks they've thought of, who needs enemies?
    Makes me ashamed to use Linux. Really they do.
    Grow up, you cretinous poltroons!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  111. LinuxWorld has been getting smaller anyway... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    ..at least there will be one less empty booth this year. *shrug* Don't tell me that it's getting "more refined" or anything. Fact is, the LinuxWorld Expo has become much smaller. Yet again, it's being filled with sales/marketing drones with the "Have your people talk to my people and we'll see how much money we can make with this Linux thing" types.

    Years ago, it was fun and full of geeks. Nowadays? It's big money and marketing.

    The Moscone center kind of sucks, too. Don't EVER eat at that "Jollibee" burger joint across the street. The organizers oughta move it to the Sacramento Convention Center.. not too far from SF, easy to get to, ample parking, and the fact that thousands of state IT geeks from dozens of government organizations would be coming over on their lunch breaks. Great chance to show off Linux to government agencies. The yearly Government Technology Conference expos are another way. Linux has absolutely NO presence at that expo. Past 5 years.. nothing at all. It wouldn't be that bad for SuSE or someone to rent a booth at an expo like that and show off what Open Source software can (and might already be doing) in a government environment.

  112. Re:MS mouse, Logitech mouse, All are made in Taiwa by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    As to 5 buttons - When I get home (Actually, when I get my desktop back up...), I'll email you my X config.

    It IS possible to get all 5 buttons to work! \o/

    It requires some oddball button remapping, though.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?